International Scientific Declaration on
EHS & MCSBrussels 2015

Statement

2015, Brussels International Scientific Declaration
on Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity andMultiple Chemical Sensitivity
Following the 5th Paris Appeal Congress that took place on the 18th of May, 2015 at the Royal
Academy of Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
Recalling the pioneering work of the American allergologist Theron G Randolph to whom weowe the first clinical description in 1962 of what is today commonly called multiple chemicalsensitivity.
Recalling the scientific workshop on multiple chemical sensitivity which was conducted in
1992 at the request of the US Environmental Protection Agency.
Recalling the WHO technical report “Environmental Health Criteria 137: Electromagnetic fields(300Hz to 300 GHz)”, published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations
Environment Program, the International Radiation Protection Association and the World
Health Organization, 1993, Geneva.
Recalling the report of the international workshop on multiple chemical sensitivity which took
place on February 21-23, 1996 in Berlin, Germany.
Recalling the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Accessto Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in EnvironmentalMatters, adopted on 25 June 1998 in Aarhus, Denmark.
Recalling the COST 244 bis international workshop on Electromagnetic Fields and Non-specific
Health Symptoms, September 19-20, 1998, Graz, Austria.
Recalling the 1999 Consensus on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity adopted following the National
Institutes of Health 1999 Atlanta Conference on the Health Impact of Chemical Exposuresduring the Gulf War, United States.
Recalling the Paris Appeal international declaration on diseases caused by chemical pollution
which was proclaimed in May 7, 2004 at UNESCO Paris headquarters.
Recalling the WHO Workshop on Sensitivity of Children to EMF Exposure. Istanbul, Turkey. 910 June 2004.
Recalling the WHO Workshop on guiding public health policy in areas of scientific uncertainty.
1International Scientific Declaration on
EHS & MCSBrussels 2015

Ottawa, Canada. 11-13 July 2005.
Recalling the WHO Fact sheet N°296, December 2005 “Electromagnetic fields and publichealth : Electromagnetic hypersensitivity”.
Recalling the report of Margaret E. Sears entitled “The Medical Perspective on EnvironmentalSensitivities”, which was prepared for the Canadian Human Rights Commission and publishedMay 2007.
Recalling the 2007/2012/2014 Bioinitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public
Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF).
Recalling the European Parliament resolution of 2 April 2009 on “health concerns associatedwith electromagnetic fields”.
Recalling the “Scientific Panel on Electromagnetic Field Health Risks: Consensus Points,
Recommendations, and Rationales”, held at Seletun, Norway, November 17-21, 2009.
Recalling the 13rd May, 2011 meeting gathering scientists and NGOs at the WHO
headquarters (Geneva) asking for the recognition of MCS and EHS as environmental diseases
and their inclusion in the International Classification of Diseases ICD-10.
Recalling the virtual platform created by WHO, following this meeting, in order to get an ICD
code for MCS and EHS.
Recalling the Resolution N°1815 of the Parliamentary Assembly, Council of Europe, adopted
May 27, 2011 «The potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their effect on theenvironment».
Recalling the Progress Report June 2013-2014 of the International EMF Project launched by
WHO in 1996.
Recalling the WHO Fact sheet N°193, October 2014 “Electromagnetic fields and public health:mobile phones”.
Recalling the recent International EMF Scientist- Appeal to the U.N. to Protect Humans andWildlife from Electromagnetic Fields and Wireless Technology, May 11, 2015.
Considering that the chemical and electromagnetic environment is deteriorating globally, andthat so called electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS)
are an escalating worldwide health problem, affecting industrialized as well as developing
countries.
We, physicians, acting in accordance with the Hippocratic Oath, we, scientists, acting in thename of scientific truth, we all, medical doctors and researchers working in different countries
2International Scientific Declaration on
EHS & MCSBrussels 2015

worldwide, hereby state in full independence of judgment, that a high and growing number of persons are suffering from EHS and MCS worldwide; that EHS and MCS affect women, men and children; that on the basis of the presently available peer-reviewed scientific evidence ofadverse health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and various chemicals, and on
the basis of clinical and biological investigations of patients, EHS is associated withexposure to EMFs and MCS with chemical exposure; that many frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum (radio- and microwavefrequencies as well as low and extremely low frequencies) and multiple chemicals areinvolved in the occurrence of EHS and MCS respectively; that the trigger for illness can be acute high intensity exposure or chronic very low
intensity exposure and that reversibility can be obtained with a natural environment
characterized by limited levels of anthropogenic EMFs and chemicals;
 that current case-control epidemiological studies and provocative studies aiming atreproducing EHS and/or MCS are scientifically difficult to construct and due to thepresent design flaws are in fact not suitable to prove or disprove causality; in particularbecause objective inclusion/exclusion criteria and endpoint evaluation criteria need tobe more clearly defined; because responses to EMFs/chemicals are highly individualand depend on a variety of exposure parameters; and finally because test conditions
are often reducing signal-to-noise ratio thereby obscuring evidence of a possibleeffect; that the nocebo effect is not a relevant nor a valid explanation when consideringscientifically valuable blind provocation studies, since objective biological markers aredetectable in patients as well as in animals;
 that new approaches are emerging for clinical and biological diagnosis and formonitoring of EHS and MCS including the use of reliable biomarkers;
 that EHS and MCS may be two faces of the same hypersensitivity-associatedpathological condition and that this condition is causing serious consequences tohealth, professional and family life; finally that EHS and MCS ought therefore to be fully recognized by international andnational institutions with responsibility for human health.
In view of our present scientific knowledge, we thereby stress all national and international
bodies and institutions, more particularly the World Health Organization (WHO), to recognize
EHS and MCS as true medical conditions which acting as sentinel diseases may create a major
public health concern in years to come worldwide i.e. in all the countries implementing
unrestricted use of electromagnetic field-based wireless technologies and marketed chemical
substances.
Inaction is a cost to society and is not an option any more.
Although our scientific knowledge still remains to be completed, we unanimously
acknowledge this serious hazard to public health, urgently requiring the recognition of thiscondition at all international levels, so that persons can benefit from adapted diagnostic tools,
innovative treatments, and above all, that major primary prevention measures are adopted
3International Scientific Declaration onEHS & MCS
Brussels 2015

and prioritized, to face this worldwide pan-epidemic in perspective.
According to the present scientific knowledge and taking into account the precautionary
principle, we unanimously recommend that true information in the use of chemicals andwireless technologies be made accessible to the public and precautionary regulation measuresapplying particularly to children and other vulnerable population subgroups be urgently taken
as it should be the case regarding chemicals in the application of the European Registration
Evaluation Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation.
To fulfill these objectives, we unanimously request that institutional committees designed forevaluating the risks of EMFs and chemicals be constituted by scientists acting in clear sciencebased independency and so exclude any experts with industry affiliation.

We therefore ask all national and international bodies and institutions to be awareof this critical environmental health issue and to take urgently their responsibility,more specifically WHO, updating its 2005 and 2014 consideration on EHS andrecognizing EHS and MCS as part of the WHO International Classification of Diseases(ICD) as it is already particularly the case in Germany and Japan which classified MCS
under a specific code. EHS and MCS should be represented by separate codes under
the WHO ICD in order to increase awareness by the medical community,governments, politicians and the general public; to foster research on the populationthat acquires these pathological syndromes; and, to train medical doctors on
effective medical prevention measures and treatments.
A response to this declaration is expected by the 30th of September, 2015.

4

International Scientific Declaration on
EHS & MCSBrussels 2015Signatories
Igor Belyaev, Ph.D, Dr.Sc, Laboratory of Radiobiology, Cancer Research Institute,Slovak Academy of Science – Slovak Republic
Dominique Belpomme, MD, MS, Professor in Oncology, Paris University Hospital –France, European Cancer and Environment Research Institute (ECERI) - Brussels
Ernesto Burgio, MD, Paediatrician, International Society of Doctors for theEnvironment (ISDE) scientific committee – Italy, European Cancer and Environment
Research Institute (ECERI) - Brussels
Christine Campagnac, MPH, Hospital Director, Association for Research and Treatment
against Cancer (ARTAC) - France, ECERI– Brussels
David O. Carpenter, MD, Institute for Health and the Environment, University of New
York at Albany- USA
Janos Frühling, MD, Professor in Nuclear Medicine, Honorary Permanent Secretary ofthe Royal Academy of medicine of Belgium - Brussels.
Yuri Grigoriev, DMedSC, Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation
Protection - Russia
Lennart Hardell, MD, Ph.D., Oncologist, University Hospital, Örebro- Sweden
Magda Havas, Ph.D Associate Prof of Environmental & Resource Studies at Trent
University – Canada
Jean Huss Honorary member of the Luxembourg Parliament and the European Council
Parliament, founder of the AKUT NGO – Luxembourg
Philippe Irigaray Ph.D, Doctor of science in Biochemisty, Association for Research andTreatment against Cancer (ARTAC) - France, ECERI– Brussels
Elizabeth Kelley, MA, Electromagnetic Safety Alliance, Inc. Arizona - USA
Michael Kundi, Ph.D, Professor, Medical University of Vienna, Center for Public Health,Institute for Environmental Health- Austria
Pierre Le Ruz, Ph.D, Criirem- France
Philip Michael, MD, IDEA Honorary Secretary – Ireland, for IDEA
SMJ Mortazavi, Ph.D, Professor of Medical Physics, Shiraz University of MedicalSciences Chair, Ionizing and Non- ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center – Iran
Hanns Moshammer, MD, ISDE Austria (AerztInnen fuer eine gesunde Umwelt, AeGU)- Austria
Joachim Mutter, M.D, Environmental Health Center – Germany
Enrique A. Navarro, Ph.D, Professor, Department of Applied Physics &Electromagnetism, University of Valencia- Spain
Peter Ohnsorge, M.D, European Academy for Environmental Medicine – Germany
William J. Rea, M.D, F.A.C.S, F.A.A.E.M, Environmental Health Center, Dallas, TexasUSA
Roberto Romizi, MD, International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE) –Italy, for ISDE
Cindy Sage, M.A, Co-Editor, Bioinitiative Reports – USA
Cyril Smith, Ph.D., D.I.C. University of Salford – England
Louise Vandelac, Ph.D, Professor, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Researcher,5International Scientific Declaration on
EHS & MCSBrussels 2015

CINBIOSE, University of Quebec in Montreal- CanadaAndré Vander Vorst, Ph.D, Professor Emeritus Microwave Laboratory - Belgium

6