THE CORRELATION BETWEEN TSUNAMI RUN-UP
HEIGHT AND COASTAL CHARACTERISTICS INDEXOF PHANG NGA AND PHUKET PROVINCES,THAILAND
PRAKHAMMINTARA Phuwieng*Supervisor:

Fumihiko Imamura**Shunichi Koshimura**MEE06015
ABSTRACT

By introducing Coastal Characteristics Index (CCI), data of coastal characteristics were used tounderstand the behavior of run-up distribution long the coast. By using SPSS software the correlation
between the run-up height and CCI were found to good. After run the TUNAMI-F1 code model for far
field tsunami and TUNAMI-N2 for near field of M 8.5 event from Sumatra and Nicobar island, we canobtain tsunami travel time of 1 hour and 40 minute to Khao Lak, maximum inundation height is 12.4 m,maximum wave flow inundation is 10.5 m, maximum flow velocity near shore of 20 m/s, hydraulic forceof 4190 m3/s2, and average inundation distance of 700 m from the shoreline. The tsunami hazard map ofKhao Lak was created by adding these results.
Keywords: Tsunami travel time, Coastal characteristics index, Inundation, Flow velocity,Hazard mapINTRODUCTION
The Indian Ocean Tsunami, which occurred on 26 December 2004, affected many countries around theIndian Ocean. The report of deaths in Thailand, total casualties in six provinces along the Andaman coast
are approximately 5,395 with 8,457 injured and 2,932 still missing (DPM: Department of Disaster
Prevention and Mitigation). The most severe tragedy occurred in Khoa Lak and Phuket province, Thailand.
When deep sea tsunami rushes to shore, due to bathymetry and topography, run-up height and inundation
on each region are different from each other and the cause of damages is also different. Collection of alldata concerning inundation and run-up height and analysis to find out correlation between theseinformation and some coastal characteristics are very important for future plan on tsunami
countermeasures.
We can simulate this phenomenal many times by using TUNAMI code (Goto et al., 1997;
Imamura et al., 2006) with initial data such as bathymetry, fault parameters, the result that we obtain willbe the same. Realistic event, even though the earthquake event, occur in same place and same magnitude
also generated tsunami but the affected of this event will not be same because of the characteristics ofcoastal areas.
In order to create hazard map of tsunami we need to obtain tsunami information. Some ofinformation such as flow velocity, inundation height and tsunami ray path direction etc. We couldn’t
measure directly, the simulation model technique is useful for this case.
*Thai Meteorological Department, ** Disaster Control Research Center, Tohoku Univ., Sendai, Japan1

METHODOLOGY
Source model
The most credible earthquake to be prepared for along the Sunda-Andaman arc, which could affectThailand, might occur within the next 50–100 years, and an earthquake of magnitude 8.5 is expected tooccur with more spatial and temporal irregularity than the megathrust events (Løvholt et al., 2006).
We can use fault parameter near Nicobar Island by using empirical equation from Wells et al.
M = LogA + 3.95
(1)(1994) as follows:
where A: rupture area, M: moment magnitude, Hank and Kanamori (1979) is given by:

M=2
LogM 0 − 10.7
3(2)while M0 is seismic moment which, can be found out by the equation as follows:
M 0 = μAu(3)where μ is shear modulus or modulus of rigidity, A is fault area, and u is the average
displacement on fault.
Fault parameters can be calculated as Table 1, we assumed the earthquake magnitude of 8.5 as theconclusion of Løvholt et al. (2006) and used these fault parameters as initial data for TUNAMI-F1 and N2code model.
Table 1 Fault parameters for F1-model and N2 -model for Sumatra subduction Zone
Depthof Fault
Fault Width Slip
StrikeDip Angle Slip Angle
fault
top Length(km)AmountAngle(deg.)(deg.)
edge (km)(km)(m)(deg.)
10340

170

11323

1590Tsunami code
Before we run model, we have to decide time step depending on grid size by checking stability CFL
condition as follow.

dt ≤dx
2ghmax(4)

where dt = time step, dx = grid size and hmax = maximum water depth.
Then, after we run model TUNAMI-F1, we can obtain tsunami propagation and arriving time.
After tsunami wave propagates to near shore, we have to run TUNAMI-N2 which includes bottom friction
and continue operation until wave inundates the land for modeling of near-field.
By using this model, we obtained the result of inundation area of Khao Lak, Pang-Nga and Phuket
province.
Bathymetric data were obtained with 1 minute mesh resolution, and time step is 1 second up to
18,000 seconds (5 hours) to run F1 model region 1. For the other regions we used, data from Dr. A.
Reungrasamee., which was digitize from the map from the Royal Thai navy detail of grid size and study
area as shown in Table 2 also time step is 0.8 second up to 5 hours.
CCI (Coastal Characteristics Index)

2Base on the hypothesis, the energy of tsunami will be reducing by friction which occurred along the raypath of tsunami wave propagation. When tsunami wave reach to shoreline and inundated coastal area all
infrastructure, properties and land used are also play role as huge friction to tsunami wave. Then if we
assemble all of these frictions together and create some equation as index to show the coastal
characteristics, as we mention before that tsunami run-up height in different coastal areas are difference. If
it have some correlation between run-up height and this index may be we can roughly estimated how highof tsunami run-up and inundation in the future. Firstly I set up the coastal characteristics index equation byassemble all frictions together as follow.
The Coastal Characteristics Index (CCI) formula as shown in below was created and a fieldsurvey data also included obtained CCI values.

CCI =θ

90+ ϕ + (W * L + B ) / 1000

(5)where θ average angle slope of the beach on affected area (flat plain = 0, perpendicular to mean sea level= 90), W the wideness of mangrove or seaside forest perpendicula to shoreline, L the lenght of mangrove
or seaside forest long pararell with shoreline ( W*L = the amount of mangrove per km2 ), B total length ofbuilding or some properties within 1 kilometer along the coast area, ϕ = Structure or shape of the shore (0for shape like convergence valley, 1 for small slope or low steepness and 2 for high slope).
Table 2 Detailed grid size of studying areas (Source: A. Reungrasamee, Chulalongkorn Univ.)

Figure 1 Tsunami source for F1-model (M 8.5) and the tsunami wave form at Khoa Lak.

RESULT AND DISSCUSSION
The initial sea surface elevation used for this studied has shown as Figure 1. The initial sea surface
displacement is copied from the bottom deformation. The delay of rupture along the fault is not including3

(Løvholt et al. 2006). Simulation for tsunami with source between Sumatra and Nicobar Island withmagnitude of 8.5 gives the traveling time from the source to Khao Lak coastline, which is 100 min or 1hour and 40 min (Figure1) show that the first wave which comes to shoreline of Khao Lak, is a negative
wave.
After we evaluate the accuracy of F1- model result and if it is satisfied, we can continue to N2 model or inundation model next. From Figure 2 the maximum velocity occurring in the sea near shore is
20.04 m/s and maximum height of this tsunami is higher than that in Khao Lak areas. The highest is morethan 12.35 m, while inundation height is 10.44 m. These results on arriving time of tsunami, velocity,inundation area, and inundation wave height and tsunami wave direction are important as parameters tocreate a hazard map. Finally, we can obtain the result of model for inundation areas of Khao Lak andPhuket areas as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 (Left) Maximum wave height of tsunami shows the highest of tsunami wave and inundation areaat Khao Lak. (Middle) Velocity of tsunami wave. (Right) Inundation area of Khao lak shows maximum
inundation height.
The correlation between run-up height and the coastal characteristics index
The correlation can be found out by using linear regression from SPSS software, and the result isshown below.
$Run-upheight(m)
thige
ph-u
nu
R

20. 00

15. 00$$$$$

10. 00

5.00

$
$$$
$
$
$
$
$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$ $
$
$
$$$
$
$
$ $$
$ $

$

$

$

$
$
$

$

$

$

$

0.00

10. 00

20. 0030. 00

CCI

Figure 5 Scatter plot of CCI and Run-up height.

4

We found that Pearson correlation co-efficient of run-up height and coastal characteristics index (CCI) is 0.378 that means it has correlation with negative way and equation of regression is(6)Y = −0.649 X + 7.884 .
This equation can explain that if X changes 1 unit, it will cause Y value to change about -0.649
unit. The square of the correlation coefficient (R2) = 0.143 means this regression equation can explain runup height distribution is 14.3 % or the CCI affects run-up height by 14.3% with standard error 4.8991,
which shows small error or on the other hand, this regression equation is highly credible.
When we use ANOVA test, F has significant level 0.05 and degree of freedom 1 and 84 is 4.00,
while F value from calculation = 24.096. That means calculation value is greater than F value obtained
from critical table, and calculation value of F is under critical. That means “CCI and run-up height have asignificant correlation together”. If we find out F value by using significant level 0.01 and degree offreedom 1 and 84 equal to 7.08, while F value from calculation we obtained is 24.096, which means Fvalue that we obtained from calculation is greater than the value from table, which means “There is a close
correlation between run-up height and CCI”. The result of the test is that at least one of the dependent
variable (CCI) has significant correlation with independent (run-up).
Hazard Map of Khao Lak
As the result of the TUNAMI-N2 model, all information that we obtained can be used to create tsunami
hazard map of Khao Lak area as showns in Figure 6.

Figure 6 Hazard map of Khao Lak, Pang-Nga Province.

CONCLUSIONSThe Coastal Characteristics Index (CCI) is an equation to obtain index values by using all importantparameters in a coastal area and correlate with the run-up height obtained from the field survey.
Run-up height had negative correlation with coastal characteristics index (CCI). Mangrove forestis the most important parameter in the CCI to reduce energy of tsunami run-up height.

5

Simulation for tsunami with source between Sumatra and Nicobar Island with magnitude of 8.5
gives the traveling time from the source to Khao Lak coastline, which is 100 min or 1 hour and 40 min.
The maximum velocity occurring in the sea near shore is 20.04 m/s. The highest is more than 12.35
meters, while inundation height is 10.44 m. Inundation distances are extended a maximum of about 2.5
km far from coastline of Pakarang cape and an average of about 700 m from shoreline.
We could create a hazard map by using intensity of tsunami run-up height, tsunami direction wave
ray, arriving time, velocity, hydraulic force and maximum inundation wave height.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my thankfulness to Dr. Goto, and special thanks to H. Yanagisawa for kindly
helping me run TUNAMI code model. Another special hearty thanks to the course leader, Dr. B.
Shibazaki for kindly helping and my advisor, Dr. Y. Fujii who has been very kind and helpful, has taken
very good care, and given advise and suggestion.
Finally I would like to thank Dr. A. Reungrasamee from Chulalongkorn University for bathymetry
data supporting.

REFERENCES
Hanks, T.C., and H. Kanamori, 1979, J.Geophys. Res. 84, 2,348-2,350.
Løvholt, H. Bungum, et al., 2006, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 979–997.
Wells, D.L. and K.J. Coppermith, 1994, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 974-1,002.
Goto, C., et al., 1997, IOC Manual, UNESCO, No.35.
Imamura, F., et al., 2006, Tsunami modeling Manual (TUNAMI model), 72pp.

6