添付資料
添付資料①

中継方式技術比較表

添付資料②

ハノイ市廃棄物マスタープラン概要

添付資料③

ワークショッププレゼンテーション資料③-1（独）国立環境研究所③-2

ハノイ市建設局③-3

JICA ベトナム廃棄物プロジェクト③-4㈱市川環境エンジニアリング／加藤商事㈱③-5

新明和工業㈱

③-6

㈱日立物流

添付資料④

ワークショップ写真

添付資料⑤

ワークショップ参加者（ベトナム側）

添付資料⑥

英文要約

77

添付資料①【中継方式技術比較表】
Ａ ． 横 型 コ ン パ ク タ ･コ ン テ ナ 方 式

Ｂ．縦型コンテナ方式

Ｃ．オープンダンプ方式

ごみ受入ホッパにて一時貯留したごみをコンパクタにてコン
テナ内に圧縮詰込みする方式。コンテナは２０ｍ 3 程度の中型か、４０ｍ３の大型トレーラ型が主流。詰込み中のコンテナを計量することにより、詰込み量のコントロールが可能。
中型コンテナを採用した場合、コンテナ移動装置を用いた全自動運転システムも可能。
1.5〜2 倍の圧縮力があり、高効率輸送が実現できる◎(押込み面圧：3〜4 kg/cm2 )ﾎｯﾊﾟ貯留ごみを切り出し詰込みするため、詰込み量はｺﾝ◎
ﾄﾛｰﾙ可能。中間計量により高効率詰込みが実現できるコンテナを垂直に設置し、収集車から直接コンテナ内に投入する方式。
主要な固定設備はごみ押込み用のウエイトのみで、簡易なシステム構成。
コンテナの計量は可能。

ごみ受入用のバンカ設備にてごみを一旦貯留し、バンカを「開」
動作させることにより、大型ダンプトレーラ車にごみを移し替える方式。
主要な固定設備はごみ受入バンカのみで、簡易なシステム構成。
車両全体、又はバンカ装置の計量が可能。

3) ごみ量変動への対応◎

ごみ搬入ピーク時には受入ホッパに一時貯留が可能△

ごみ搬入ピーク時の対応は、設置コンテナ台数で決まる○

4) 中継ｼｽﾃﾑとしての適合性◎

単一ごみを大量中継輸送するのに適している△

他品種、少量ごみを受け入れるシステムに適している

△

○

同

△

△

投入側ゲートの構造上、汚水が漏れる可能性がある◎△

８系統（ピーク時対応を考慮）○

３系統（ピーク時対応を考慮）

×22ｍ コンテナ：８０台、専用輸送車：５６台△

40ｍ ３ダンプトレーラ：３９台、トラクタ：３０台

項

目

イメージ図

１．方式概要２ 方式 の特徴

1) 圧縮性能（輸送効率）
2) 詰込み効率（輸送効率）

３衛生面
４

ごみ受入部でのごみ飛散が無く、コンテナ保管中も殆ど臭気が外部に漏れない。
汚水漏れ対策型テールゲートとコンテナ下部汚水タン
クにより、ごみと汚水の同体輸送が可能。

△△

ｳｴｲﾄによる重力圧縮のため、殆ど圧縮性能は望めない(押込み面圧：0.8 kg/cm2 程度)
コンテナ計量は可能だが、バッファ機能がないため、収集車単位の投入となり、詰込み量のｺﾝﾄﾛｰﾙができない

×△

圧縮機能なし。(押込み面圧：ゼロ)
車両の計量が可能で、バッファ機能を持つが、収集車単位の投入となり、詰込み量のｺﾝﾄﾛｰﾙができない
ピーク時の対応はバンカでの一時貯留、及び迅速な車両入替で対応する
輸送効率は低いが、大型車両の採用が可能。
施設内：ｵｰﾌﾟﾝｼｽﾃﾑであるため、脱臭ｼｽﾃﾑの効率が悪い
輸送車両：ｵｰﾌﾟﾝﾀｲﾌﾟであるため、ｶﾊﾞｰ等の対策が必要
排出ゲートまわりのパッキンにより、ごみと汚水の同体輸送が可能。

ケース スタディ

1) 臭気対策○

2) 汚水対策◎

1) 設備系統数

◎

２系統

◎

40ｍ トレーラコンテナ：２４台、トラクタ：１８台

3) 施設／建築面積、延床面積○

建築面積：約 1,200 ｍ 、延床面積：約 2,400 ｍ○

建築面積：約 1,300 ｍ 、延床面積：約 2,300 ｍ○

建築面積：約 1,150 ｍ ２、延床面積：約 2,100 ｍ２

4) 敷

地 面

積

◎

駐車場：コンテナ、車両台数が少ないため省スペース化
スロープ：３方式同様（階高が同様のため）

×

駐車場：コンテナ、車両台数が多く大きなｽﾍﾟｰｽが必要
スロープ：３方式同様（階高が同様のため）△

駐車場：コンテナ、車両台数が多く大きなｽﾍﾟｰｽが必要
スロープ：３方式同様（階高が同様のため）

5) 運

転 人

員

◎

８０名（施設人員：４０名△

１６８名（施設人員：４８名

2) コンテナ、車両台数

５．総 合 評 価【◎:３、○:２、△:１、×:０】

３

２

２

＋ 運転手：４０名）

左

３

２

２

＋ 運転手：１２０名） ○１０３名（施設人員：３７名＋ 運転手：６６名）

輸送効率が高いため、車両、コンテナ台数が少なく、敷輸送効率が悪いため、車両、コンテナ台数が多くなり、圧縮機構がないため、コンパクタ方式よりも輸送効率が
４０ 地面積の省スペース化が可能。
１５ 敷地面積、ｲﾆｼｬﾙ、ﾗﾝﾆﾝｸﾞｺｽﾄ等他方式に比べ不利となる。 ２４ 悪くなり、車両、コンテナ台数が増える。
このため、ｲﾆｼｬﾙ、ﾗﾝﾆﾝｸﾞｺｽﾄも他方式より安価。
大型ごみの輸送に適している方式。
単一ごみの大量輸送には不向きなシステム。

添付資料②：2013 年ハノイ市廃棄物マスタープラン・対象廃棄物概要【廃棄物名】：Domestic Solid waste【定義】家庭系、商業サービス（市場、飲食・食品工場、商業、公共施設）、事務所、学校、研究機関、道路、バス停、鉄道駅、病院、産業地域で発生する非有害廃棄物【特徴】42.88％が有機性廃棄物（野菜、食べ物、剪定枝、紙、葉等）、57.12％が無機系廃棄物（プラスチック、鋼鉄類）【現状フロー図】

1）収取運搬予算増強に伴い収集率並びに機材の近代化が図られてきているが、道路インフラ（中心 4区の細い路地や主要幹線道路整備）が近代化を阻んでいる面がある。また都市部は手押し
車→パッカー車の積替え地点や保管施設の設置が進まない。特に中心部は 3-7m3 パッカー
車が運搬を担うが、これらのサイズの車両が片道 50 ㎞以上運搬することになる。また分別収集は極限られた地域でしか行われていない。都市部での不法投棄は減少している。郊外
部では中核村落のみで回収が行われている。
ハノイ URENCO が 2011 年度の収集運搬予算としてハノイ市人民委員会から受けた金額は約10 億円だった。これには家庭から徴収する料金等は含まれていない。単純計算で 10 億円
÷3200t/日÷365 日＝856 円/t。但し、このほか様々なサービス収入があるとのこと【要調査】。

12）処理・処分施設
現在ほとんどの廃棄物が埋め立て処分されているが、今後大型の最終処分場を確保することは制限が多いことが予想される。
＜建設完了或いは進行中案件＞①Nam Son 埋め立て処分場-Phase1：URENCO8 運営。83.5ha（埋め立て区域は 50ha、9 セル）
生活廃棄物用として利用。既に 7 セルが埋め立て済。市内都市部 10 地区・郊外部 5地区より 3200〜3500t/日の廃棄物が持ち込まれている。
併設して 5ha の産業廃棄物処理施設を有する。焼却炉有。（現在 75t/日も建設中）
1,500m3/日の浸出水処理施設。
-Phase2：URENCO8 運営。106ha（拡張規模は 79.5ha、【106 との整合性要確認】）②Cau Dien コンポスト化施設：3.9ha。URENCO7 運営。現在 70t/日の投入を行って運営、
稼働率 42％。スペイン ODA。
＊ハノイ URENCO が上記 2 施設を中心とした処理の為の 2011 年度予算としてハノイ市人民委員会から受けた金額は約 5.6 億円だった。但し、その他様々なサービス収入があるとのこと【要調査】。
③Kieu Ky
-処分場（Gia Lam 地区）：Gia Lam URENCO 運営。6.3ha。60t〜80t/日-コンポスト化施設：Gia Lam URENCO 運営。7.7ha（一説には 14ha）。施設規模 150t/日、稼働率 30％程度。
④Xuan Son 処分場（Son Tay 地区）-Phase1：Son Tay Urban Work 社運営、13ha、10 セル。200t/日（一説には 1,000t/日）。
-Phase2：Thang Long 社運営、13ha、最大 48ha。
⑤Son Tay 処理施設（Son Tay 地区）：Seraphin 社運営。
-Phase1：200t/日、1.5ha。選別・コンポスト化・プラスチックリサイクル・焼却・埋め立て。しかし失敗し、Thang Long 社との JV になる。
-Phase2：300t/日焼却炉、1ha。稼働開始。
-Phase3：Phase1 を建替えて 500t/日（一説には 300t/日）焼却炉建設予定。
⑥Nui Toong 処分場（Chuong My 地区）：Xuan Mai Urban Environment Company-Phase1：2ha、40t/日、浸出水流出問題があった。
-Phase2：9.2ha（一説には 6.2ha）、コンポスト施設計画有、3000t/日（？）⑦Viet Hung Commune（Dong Anh地区）：Dong Anh 地区人民委員会運営、Thanh Quang
industrial construction and trade company 投資。8.75ha。プラズマ、300t/日。
⑧Phuong Dinh commune（ Dan Phuong 地区）：Thanh Quang company投資。5ha。200t/日（衛生埋め立て＋焼却）【全体政策】
National strategy for integrated solid waste management up to 2025, a vision to2050 に基づく。
国の北部・中部・南部の 3 地域での政策遂行。北部には 12 か所が注力地点として指定され、ハノイには 3 か所指定されている（Nam Son、Dong Ke、Xuan Son）。
2

【マスタープラン】
人口は 2020 年に 730 万人、2030 年に 910 万人、2050 年には 1000 万人を超えると予測。
Nam Son 処分場の Phase2 以降、大型埋め立て処分場は建てられない。分別効果についても疑問。
焼却比率を 60％〜85％に高め、リサイクルと共に 85％-90％を目指す。
分散型処理・処分（中北部、東部、南部、西部に複合施設）
運搬の効率化民間活力の導入
収集運搬については Zone を 3 つに分割（6 か所）。総投資としては約 30 億円を市の予算として計画。
‐中・北・東部：4,600〜7,700t/日（3 か所で対処）。2020 年までに TayMo、Lam Du の具現化。
‐南部：800〜1,000t/日（1 か所で対処）‐西部：1,300〜1,500t/日（2 ケ所で対処）処理施設については既設も含め 16 か所（中・北・東部 5 か所，南部 6 か所，西部 5か所）、総投資額は市の予算として 340 億円程度を計画。
資金としては国家予算の他、ODA や民間投資を念頭に置く。
新技術導入の運用や中継施設管理などの対する人的能力開発も行って行く【具体的計画】
NEDO/日立造船＋ハノイ URENCO：Nam Son での 75t 発電付キルンストーカ炉（2015 年
完成予定）
Dong Minh 社：米国企業と協力して、廃棄物から油・アスファルト・ブロックの製造を行う予定。
AIC 社：15ha, 2000t/日。日本技術を使って廃棄物処理をする予定（内容不明）。25億円前後。
周辺県との広域処理の検討も進めている。
＜その他将来案件＞①Chau Can （Phu Xuyen地区）： 25-30ha, 600 tons/日, Thang Long Environment Service
JSCによる投資。
②Cao Duong （Thanh Oai 地区）：20 ha, 500 tons/日。
③Phu Dong （Gia Lam 地区）: 20 ha, 1000 tons/日。
④Dong Ke （Chuong My 地区）： 24ha。800-2000 tons/日。
⑤Lai Thuong （Thach That地区）：6.3 ha。200 tons/日。Minh Quan high-tech development
JSCによる投資。
⑥Hop Thanh （My Duc 地区）： 200 tons/日, Minh Quan
を中心とした投資。

3

high-tech development JSC

3/9/2015

Appropriate and Efficient Waste
Management Required forDevelopment of City
Tomonori ISHIGAKI
National Institute for Environmental
Studies, Japan

Development of City and Waste Management

City growth and expansion will complicate waste logistics

1

3/9/2015

Trend of City Scale in the World
40,000,000

35,000,000

Historical Trend of World Largest City

30,000,000

Tokyo

25,000,000

NYC

20,000,000

Babylon

15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000

40,000,000

200,000-1100

700,000

Rome

100,000

0-1600

35,000,000

BagdadAvaris450,000

Beijing

London900,000

40,000,000-600

35,000,000

-100

400

900

1400

1900

30,000,000
25,000,000

Top-15 Population in 1925

Kolkata

ChicagoShanghaiCairo

Rio de Janeiro

BuenosAires

Paris

Los Angeles

LondonSao Paulo

Tokyo

NewYorkBirmingham

Moscow

Manchester

ViennaBostonOsaka

Philadelphia

Essen

BuenosAires

Chicago0
Paris

5,000,000

0Berlin10,000,000

5,000,000
Tokyo

10,000,000

London15,000,000

NewYork

15,000,000

Moscow

Top-15 Population in 1975

20,000,000

20,000,000

Osaka

25,000,000

Mexico City

30,000,000

Population of Large Cities in 2015
40,000,000
35,000,000
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000

5,000,000
0#39 HCMC (approx. 9.0 million)#108 Ha Noi (approx. 3.7 million)#511 Hai Phong (approx. 0.98 million)#523 Da Nang (approx. 0.95 million)

Demographia

2

700

MSW generation (kg/cap/y)

MSW generation (kg/cap/y)

3/9/2015

600

700
600

人口・原単位・ごみの量

500
400
300

200
100

0
0

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000

500
400
300
200

100
0

0

GDP/capita (USD)

10000 15000 20000 25000

population density (cap/km2)

50

100

40

80

30

60

20

40

10

20

0
0

1,000

2,000

collection coverage (%)

Irregal dump (%)

5000

0
3,000

GDP/capita (USD)

Appropriate Waste Management underDeveloping Situation
Transportation
Capacity

Source Reduction
Care for Hazardous Waste

Disposal Capacity

Reduction of
Disposal Waste3

3/9/2015

Transportation Capacity
CentralCollection

Collection Station

RoadsideContainer

CurbsideCollection

Distance
fromgenerator

L

S

for
Collector

L

S

EfficientCollection

Good
Administrative
Service

Transport Station will be one solution
as the best combination of collection and transportation ofhousehold waste

Waste Volume Reduction• Waste to Energy

1903, Osaka, Japan– Volume reduction and Sanitation– Energy Production• Mechanical BiologicalTreatment– Volume Reduction and Energy
production

4

3/9/2015

Disposal Capacity• Promotion of Biodegradation• Compaction (Solidification)– Prevention of hazard risk
– Financial cost

• Expansion– sometimes bad practiceDegradation-Promotive Landfills
Bioreactor Landfill
Impearmea
ble capping

Leachate
recirculation
分解促進

埋立層内脱窒Semiaerobic Landfill
GHGs reduction

Biodegradation

メタン発生量増加

Drainage
Leachate
Treatment
Plant

Passive ventilation
Constructed Wetland

GHGs Reduction

Reduction of Impact of Water Pollution

5

3/9/2015

Technology in Transfer Station• Logistics management– Total reduction of travel per waste– Capacity– Frequency– Traffic• Physical Compaction– Volume Reduction• Resource Recovery– Valuables: Metal, Plastics– for Fuels, Materials in Industry

Economic Effect• Increase Employment– Drivers– Operators– Resource Separators• Recovered Resource• Suppression of Traffic congestion• Infrastructure Preparation– Road, Junction– Countermeasure for Inundation

6

3/9/2015

Air Pollution, GHGs Reduction• By Reduction of Travel Times• By Using Updated Transportation• By Suppression of Traffic congestion

Separation Enhances Recycling(and Reduction of Disposal)
RecyclablePaper Plastic Glass
Materials
TextileMetal Lubber
Fuels
Wood
OthersHouseholds

Garbage

Composting7

3/9/2015

Reduction of Disposal Waste andExtension of Landfill Lifetime
Paper Plastic Glass
TextileMetal Lubber
Wood
OthersGarbage

40% reduction of disposal waste Prolong 1.6 times of lifetime of landfillor attenuate impact of waste increase8

3/9/2015

WASTE TRANSFER STATION CONSTRUCTION
IN HANOI CITY

Prepaired by: Mr Hoang Nam Son
Hanoi Construction Department (DOC)
Hanoi, 10th March, 2015

CONTENT
I

II

III

IV

• SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN HA NOI• MASTER PLAN AND LOCATION OF WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS• NECESSITY OF SOLID WASTE TRANSFER STATION INVESTMENT FOR
HANOI CITY• CONCLUSION AND PROPOSALS

1

3/9/2015

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN
HANOICOLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION AND TREATMENT
OF WASTE IN HANOI
1. MSW Collection:
MSW generated from households, offices daily collected by handcarts and containers of 240l,
then transported to the collection points for transportation to Nam Son landfill site by trucks(the distance is110 km).
2. MSW transportation:
The vehicles are used for waste transportation by URENCO are special trucks with compact,
the loading capacity is from 3 tons  15 tons. The domestic waste in the areas of 10 districts and
5 suburban districts: Từ Liêm, Thanh Trì, Đông Anh, Sóc Sơn and Mê Linh transported to Nam
Son landfill site by the specialized trucks.

2

3/9/2015

Productive Sector

Consumers

Waste

StorageTransportation

Final Disposal(Landfill)

CHU TRÌNH CỦA RÁC THẢIPROCESS OF COLLECTION AND TRANSPORTATIONSOLID WASTE IN HANOI

3

3/9/2015

COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION AND TREATMENT
OF WASTE IN HANOI
3. MSW treatment:
The landfill is mainly method used fordomestic waste treatment at the waste
treatment facilities of Hanoi city (8590% of collected waste transported to
Nam Son landfill site, Soc Son, Hanoi
for landfill.
Nam Son landfill site

Waste generation sourceand storage system
Household

Nylon and paper bags
Plastic/metal dustbin.
Containers….

Collection

URENCO
Privatecompanies
Handcarts

Transferstation

URENCOTransfer station
Collecting point

Transportation
systemURENCO
Privatecompanies
Specialized truck
Compress truck

Treatment

Composting

Open dumping
Landfill site

Xe tải nhỏ

Market Nylon bags
 Dustbins….

URENCO
Privatecompanies

Industry, commerce andoffices.
 Plastic/metal dustbin

Street, public areas
 Nylon bags.
 Containers…
Hospital.
 Nylon bags
 Special dustbin

Small truck
Compress

truck

URENCO
Privatecompanies
Specialized
truck

URENCOSpecialized
truck

URENCO
Privatecompanies

Landfillsite

Small truck
Compress truck

URENCO
Privatecompanies
Specialized
truck

URENCO

Incineration

Specialized
truck

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN HANOI

4

3/9/2015

FORECAST ON SOLID WASTE AMOUNT IN HANOISTATE MANAGEMENTOF NORMAL SOLID WASTE IN HANOI
Department of Construction, Hanoi Environment and Natural Resources Department areappropriate authorities as advisors for Hanoi People’s Committee (HPC), assisting HPC in
performing the state management in the sector of normal solid waste in Hanoi area.
-Department of Construction (DOC) advises and assists the City People's Committee in
performing the state management in the sector of normal solid waste in the areas of 10 districts
and 01 town including: Ba Dinh, Hoan Kiem, Hai Ba Trung, Dong Da West Lake Street,
Thanh Xuan, Hoang Mai, Long Bien, Ha Dong and Son Tay town.
- Hanoi Environment and Natural Resources Department advises and assists the City
People's Committee in performing the state management in the sector of normal solid waste in

the areas of 18 suburban districts including : Tu Liem, Thanh Tri, Gia Lam, Dong Anh Soc
Son, Hoai Duc, Dan Phuong, Thach, Quoc Oai, Thanh Oai, Thuong Tin, Phu Xuyen, My Duc,
Chuong My, Ba Vi, Phuc Tho, Ung Hoa Linh5

3/9/2015

CHALLENGES AND ISSUESON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN HANOI The quantity of waste is increasing in proportion to the rate of population growth.
 Source separation is not widely expanded.
 The advanced technology is not yet applied to waste treatment, landfilling is still themain method for solid waste treatment (95% of municipal waste collected amount).
 The waste collection and transportation is not appropriate.(transport distance far making
costly and not ensure the environmental sanitary).
 There are not any waste transfer stations in Hanoi.
 Low awareness and sense of responsibility of communities on solid waste management

as well as the sanitation keeping and waste minimization.

MASTER PLAN AND
LOCATIONS OFWASTE TRANSFERSTATIONS IN HANOI

6

3/9/2015

MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOICAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050
 Master plan on solid waste disposalof Hanoi capital to 2030, with avision to 2050 approved by Prime
Minister at Decision No 609/QĐTTg dated 24, April, 2014.

MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOICAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050
 The Planning objectives :- To project the total volume of generated solid waste and solid waste disposal demands, todetermine modes of solid waste collection, transportation and disposal; to identify
locations and sizes of solid waste transfer stations and disposal complexes in Hanoi
capital.
- To provide a basis for the implementation of investment projects to build, upgrade,
improve or expand the collection and transportation systems and solid waste transfer
stations and disposal complexes in Hanoi capital.

7

3/9/2015

MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOICAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050
1. Population size of Hanoi :Total population as of 1, April, 2009:

6,451,909 people;- Forecasting the population size for the periods as follows:+ Total estimated population in 2020:

7318. 800 people;+ The total estimated population in 2030:

9,135,500 people;+ The total estimated population in 2050:

10,733,500 people

MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOICAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050
2. The total amount of waste generated in
Hanoi:- The volume of generated domestic waste:
5.371tons/day, in which:+ Urban areas: 3.200 tons/day+ Suburban areas: 2.171 tons/day.
-Collection

ratio:The

MSW amounttransported to the landfills is about 3.875 tấn,approximately of 77% of generated waste .
-Emission target: 1,1 kg/person/day.

8

3/9/2015

MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOICAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050
3. Composition of MSW in Hanoi% theo khối lượng

17.72

Chất thải hữu cơGiấy các loại
Nhựa
Nilon

4.68
1.16
1.43

Cao su, đồ da
Vải
2.97

52.08

1.98

Gỗ
Thủy tinh

3.95

Kim loại
Sành sứ

5.63

Các tạp chất khác
3.02
4.86

MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOICAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050
7. MSW treatment facilities and complex
planning:
Master plan on solid waste disposal of Hanoi
indicated

to

have

17

MSW

treatmentcomplexes, in which, 8 existed ones will be
upgraded and expanded and 9 ones will be

invested to built. All will be divided in 3
zones.

9

3/9/2015

MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOICAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050
8. Waste Transfer Stations planning :The volume of solid waste collected and transported to the WTS of Hanoi is estimatedabout 5,700 ÷ 10,200 tons / day and was allocated to 5 WTSs of 3 zones

LOCATION, SIZEWASTE TRANSFER STATIONS(MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOI CAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050)
WTS

Collection areas

Receiving waste
volume(ton/day)

Area
(ha)

Notes

Thanh Lâm WTSĐong Anh- Me Linh, Kim Hoa town and suburban of
Mê Linh.

< 1.000

1,5

Location undergeneral planningof HanoiTây Mỗ WTS

Cau Giay district, Từ Liêm, Thanh Xuân

< 1.000

1,5

Location undergeneral planningof Hanoi

800 – 1.000

1,5Location undergeneral planningof Hanoi

ZONE IZONE IITả Thanh Oai WTS Hà Đông district, Thanh Trì, Thanh Oai

103/9/2015

LOCATION, SIZEWASTE TRANSFER STATIONS(MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOI CAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050)

WTS

Collection areas

Receivingwaste
volume(ton
/day)

Area
(ha)

Notes

Quốc Oai
WTS½ of Hoài Đức district, Quốc Oai Ecology town, suburban of QuốcOai.

500 - 700

1,5

Location undergeneral planningof Hanoi

Chúc Sơn
WTS½ of Hoài Đức district, Chúc Sơn Ecology town, suburban of Chương 500 - 1.000
Mỹ.

1,5

Location undergeneral planningof Hanoi

ZONE III

LOCATION, SIZEWASTE TRANSFER STATIONS(MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOI CAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050)

Investment phases for waste transfer station in Tay Mo:
The implement phases of Solid Waste Planning of Hanoi capital to 2030, with a vision to2050 under the stage is set up on the basis of investment phases. The investment in theconstruction of solid waste treatment systems based on actual urban development, theanticipative investment according the planning no more than 5 years of plan since the planis scheduled for completion until operation.
Giai đoạn từ năm 2010 đến năm 2020:
WTS

Are (ha)Capacity(ton/day)

Total budget(Billion đong)Capital source

Tay Mo WTS

1,5< 1.000

57,0State Budget11

3/9/2015

LOCATION, SIZEWASTE TRANSFER STATIONS(MASTER PLAN ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OF HANOI CAPITAL TO 2030, WITH A VISION TO 2050)

Layout of domestic waste transportation

Map of WTS projects,
MSW treatmentcomplexes

123/9/2015

NECESSITY OF SOLID WASTE TRANSFERSTATION INVESTMENT FOR HANOI CITY

1. Landfill is still a main method used for MSW treatment in Hanoi now (85%)
2. The collected waste is transported to Nam Son landfill site, 50 km far from Hanoi centerwith over 500 turns of trucks from 7-10 tons. It is rather difficult and limited to the wastetransport from the areas of districts to Nam Son landfill site in the current traffic.
3. Due to the transport distance away, the turn over time of collection truck long, hence thewaste transportation directly to landfill sites is uneconomic and inefficient.

13

3/9/2015

Investment in construction waste transfer stationfor Hanoi?????????
NECESSITY
1. Ensure the MSW management to implement as Planning.
Planning
2. Improve the environmental quality in general and waste management in particular.
3. Improve the technology, reduce the time for waste collection and the number of trucks
transported waste to the final disposal facility .
4. Ensure the operation effect of transport vehicles in economy and technical, no wastemoney contributes to reduce the cost of waste transportation of city, reduce the environmental
pollution, reduce the traffic density on the collection routes and transport of waste.

CONCLUSION
Solid waste management under the Master Plan is an important and imperative task
nowadays in order to protect environment, urban landscape, human health, contributes
to urban clean – beauty, civilization. Project of Waste Transfer Station is required to
implement as soon as possible. Therefore:- The feasibility study of WTS project in Cau Dien should beaccelerated theimplement according the Document No 267 of HPC.
- Suggest Departments: Architecture and Planning, Investment and Planning andEnvironment Environment and Natural Resources accompany with DOC to direct andhelp URENCO and IKE company to complete the feasibility study of project;- Kindly suggest HPC to approve the project policy early, facilitate the project
development.

14

3/9/2015

For a Sustainable
Development

THANKS FOR YOUR LISTENING

15

3/9/2015

Introduction of “Vietnam Waste Project”

10 March 2015

Hideki Wada, Team Leader
Vietnam Waste Project1

Project outline

21

3/9/2015

Project outline
 Project name

 Project for Capacity Development on Integrated Management of Municipal Solid Waste in Vietnam
 Vietnam Waste Project (http://vietnamwastepj.blogspot.com)

 Project scheme Technical assistance by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)

 Project purpose Capacity development for domestic waste, construction waste and septic tank sludge Counterparts

 MOC
 Hanoi Thua Thien Hue Province as a model city

 Major activities

 MOC• Review on existing laws/regulations• Arrangement of data monitoring system• Promotion of SWM complexes Hanoi• Implementation of solid waste management master plan in Hanoi• Pre-F/S study on a SWM complex• Promotion of SWM complexes Thua Thien Hue Province as a model city
• Support for SWM planning and its implementation

 Project duration: four years (2014-2018)
 Public outreach seminars: once a year in January

3

Activity 1

42

3/9/2015

Comprehensive legal and policy review
 Decision 798/2011/QD-TTg
 Decision No.1440/2008/QD-TTg
 Decision No.1873/2010/QD-TTg
 Decree No.174/2007/ND-CP Circular No.39/2008/TT-BTC
 Circular No.12/2011/TT-BTNMT Decision No. 23/2006/QD-BTNMT Circular No.25/2009/TT-BTNMT Decision No.43/2007/QD-BYT
 QCVN 02:2008/BTNMT TCVN6696-2000
 TCVN 261-2001
 TCVN 670-2009
 Decision No.27/2004/QD-BXD

 Law on environment protection
No.52/2005/QH11
 Decree No.59/2007/ND-CP Circular No.13/2009/TT-BXD
 Decision No.2149/2009/QD-TTg
 Decision No.1216//QD-TTg
 Decree No.04/2009/ND-CP Circular No.101/2010/TT-BTC
 Circular No.121/2008/TT-BTC
 Decision No.1466/2008/QD-TTg
 Circular No.05/2007/TT-BTNMT Decision No.71/2010/QD-TTg
 Decision 798/2011/QD-TTg

5

Review example 1. Is the national target too ambitious?
 Example. Recycling rate target in Vietnam (National Strategy)
Index
Recycling rateover collected waste
in urban areas

Definition
𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑
𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑

Targetin 2015

Targetin 2020

Targetin 2025

60%

85%

90%

 Current recycling rate in Japan (including energy recovery)
𝑅+𝑊𝑟+𝑊𝑖𝑒
2635+6617+33990∗0.59==65% (in 2012)
𝑅+𝑊
2635+42616• Wie: waste incinerated with energy recovery• R: recyclable at sources• Wr: waste recycled• W: waste to be disposed
 59% of total incinerators in terms of facility number use waste energy.



6

3

3/9/2015

Review example 2. Is the waste amount standard too large?
 Standard amount of domestic waste (QCVN 07/2010/BXD)
Urban type

Amount of MSW

Collection rate(kg/per/day)(%)

Special, I

1.3

100

II

1.0

≥ 95

III, IV

0.9

≥ 90

V

0.8

≥ 85
1,400

Source: Thua Thien Hue ProvinceStandard by QCVN

1,200

(g/day/capita)

1,000

800

600

Actual data (weighbridge data)

400

7

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

0

2025

200

Three guidance manuals
 Technology selection
 Mid-term/long-term facility development plan Sound financial management

843/9/2015

Activity 2

9Implementation of Hanoi Master Plan Domestic waste Source separation• What implication can be drawn from JICA 3R Project?
• How to review it?
• How to reflect to the future collection system?
 How to collect?
• Usage of containers ok?
• Collection frequency appropriate?
• How to improve the loading point system?
 Where to transport?
• How beneficial is a transfer station?

 Construction waste
 Septic tank sludge management

1053/9/2015

Improvement on construction waste management
Sold to recycler

Steel, Other metals
Plastics,
Packing materials

RecycleRecycle market

Soil waste

Landfill
Disposal site

Construction site
Scrapping site

Illegaldumping

Small transfer
stations

Lands, ponds, canals
and public areas...

Mixed waste of concrete,
bricks and soil

Landfill
Disposal site

Partially so far

Target waste
for recycle

Promotethe flow

RecycleAnother construction site

JICA project
support

11

Challenge to proper septic tank sludge management

Septic tank sludge
generation

Collected by
URENCO

Appropriate
treatment(Cau Dien TP,
landfill)

CompostFish farmCollected byprivate collectors
Illegal discharge intorivers, ponds and
lakes

12

6

3/9/2015

Crisis in Soc Son Landfill site

13

Activity 3

147

3/9/2015“Issues to be solved” for Thua This Hue Province Reasonable waste projection
 Promotion of recycling at sources Possible source separation
 Collection of hazardous domestic waste Reasonable collection system in accordance with area characteristics
 Solid waste management in rural areas
 Optimal waste stream planning Total cost management
 Institutional reformation
 Data management and publication
 Applicability of GIS

Issues Other wastes
 Flooding waste management as “adaptation”

15

Public involvement in hazardous waste collection◆Target waste
Waste
Dry battery
Florescent tube

Small e-waste such as
mobile phone…

Hazardousness
Heavy metals contained- Heavy metals contained- Dangerousness whencollected
Heavy meals contained◆Collection points for involvement
TargetInvolvement

RetailersCustomers

Schools

School children

Education

Factories

Factory workers

CSR…
CSR: Corporate Social Responsibility

168

3/9/2015

Optimal zoning?

264→696t/d

12→38t/d

48→112t/d

17

Possible technical package

Domestic
waste

Collection &transportation

IncinerationAsh

Fed to cement
factory

Composting incommunities
Composting

Incineration

Compost18

9

3/9/2015

Mission of the master plan
1,400

1,600,000

1,200

1,400,000

Waste Amount (t/d)

800Collected Waste

1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000

600
600,000
400

400,000

200

The second crisis
200,000

The first crisis
Past

Future

0

2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030

0

Remained Capacity in hte landfill (ton)Remained
Capacityin the Landfill(scale in the right)

1,000

19

Smoothing and incentive
200,000
180,000

1st Term

Million VND/ year

160,000

2nd Term

3rd Term

4th Term

140,000
120,000
100,000
80,00060,00040,00020,000
0
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1st Period9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Year

Total cost before introduction
Planning
Actualof the Tipping fee system

Carry-over to the
Total cost after introduction of the Tipping fee system

50%
Saved costs
50%
Total costs –revenuein the 1st period

Total costs –revenuein the 1st period

2nd period

2nd Period
Planning
Deducted

Profit of a SWM
service provider
Total costs –revenuein the 2nd period

2010