Perspectives of QE1 performance evaluation <50 points in total>
Judges will evaluate the following three perspectives, which are the foundation of knowledge professionals, based on the specific evidence for each.
Perspectives (Outcomes)

Process
Worked on self-improvement to strengthen his/her own research capabilities with their own area ofexpertise as its core.

1

Strengthening of specialized
research capabilities[Specific evidence for the evaluation]- Status of research to date (purpose, significance, content, methods, ingenuity) (5 points)- Presentation at academic conferences (5 points)- Future research plan (10 points)

Allotmentof marks

20

Acquired methods necessary for the creation of new industries / new fields, such as methods for analysis ofsocial issues and for utilize research seeds by using knowledge from different fields.
2

Challenge to create newindustries/fields or realize
new value creation

Understanding of diversity as
well as acquiring practical3

skills and an international
mindset based on that
understanding[Specific evidence for the evaluation]- Results of PBL, workshops, etc. (problem setting, analysis, idea generation, etc.) (8 points)- Vision and career plan to link the student’s research to the creation of a new industry / new fields (7points)

15

Gained awareness as a global leader and global skills in domestic and international diversified
environments.
[Specific evidence for the evaluation]- Active participation and practice in discussions in English (4 points)- Degree of demonstration of leadership (4 points)- Degree of understanding of diversity (4 points)- Participation and practice in international programs (study abroad, internship, short-term dispatch toabroad, international conferences, overseas training, etc.) (3 points)

15

Perspectives of QE2 performance evaluation < 50 points in total>
Judges will evaluate the following three perspectives, which are the foundation of knowledge professionals, based on the specific evidence for each.

Perspectives (Outcomes)

Process[10 points]
Worked on research in his/her own specialty or in collaboration
with other fields, and actively present their results at academic
conferences, etc..

1Strengthening of specialized[Specific evidence for the evaluation]
research capabilities- Degree of conference participation (3 points)- Degree of participation in research-related meetings and conference
administration (3 Points)- Paper submission or challenges for it (4 Point)[7 point]
Designed projects or joint research, etc. with his/her own research as thecore of it for solving social issues.

2Challenge to create new [Specific evidence for the evaluation]industries / new fields or realize - Designed more than 1 case (2 points)- Quality of research and analysis up to the conceptualization (2 points)
new value creation- Objective evaluation by experts of the content of concept (3 points)

Output[10 points]
Received awards from academic societies for research in their own
specialized field or for research conducted in collaboration with other fields.
[Specific evidence for the evaluation]- At least one award (3 points)- At least 2 adopted peer-reviewed papers (5 points)- Others (books, other publications, patents, etc.) (2 points)

Allotmentof marks

20[8 point]
Realized joint projects with companies, other institutions, or otherlaboratories in TUAT for solving social issues, based on his/her own ideas.
[Specific evidence for the evaluation]- Realization of at least one project (4 points)- Feasibility of solving social issues (2 points)- Evaluation by joint research organization* (2 points)* Please ask the host researcher of your partner organization to fill in the Form
16 that the WISE Program provides.

15

3

Understanding of diversity as wellas acquiring practical skills and aninternational mindset based onthat understanding[7points]
Participated in activities, projects, and research projects in the diversity
environment at home and abroad.

[8 points]
Launched a collaborative project with a diverse group of members andachieved the goals of that project.

[Specific evidence for the evaluation]- 360-degree evaluation (3 points)- Number of participation in the project (2 points), and contents ofactivities undertaken (2 points)* This includes a wide range of projects conducted with multiple peers
such as international workshops, joint project of agriculture andengineering, joint activities with public organizations such as FAO Friends,
joint projects with other universities, students’ voluntary seminars, andother independent activities. Joint research that qualifies under thisperspective is also included.

[Specific evidence for the evaluation]- Launching a joint project with diverse members (3 points)- Achievement of project goals (5 points)* This includes a wide range of projects conducted with multiple peers suchas international workshops, joint project of agriculture and engineering,
joint activities with public organizations such as FAO Friends, joint projects
with other universities, students’ voluntary seminars, and otherindependent activities. Joint research that qualifies under this perspective isalso included.

15