O-DA
Version Up Project
TOGAF, Open, Reusable,Dynamic Architecturescollaborative to Agile

O-DA 2.0◼ Is for Real-Time Assured, Dependable Systems◼ Seeks the Answer for the NIST 2002 Report◼ Challenges To 60% Reduction System Development Cost

What is O-DA
◼ O-DA is a standard which defines a Framework andguidance for developing an Assured and/or Dependable
Architecture. (The O-DA Standard)◼ The standard has the concept of modeling dependencies,building assurance cases, achieving agreement on

accountability in the event of actual or potential failure anddoing so within the architecture process.(The O-DA
Standard Press Release)

For more information◼ The O-DA Standard◼ The O-DA Standard Press Release

The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

Why O-DA 2.0?
We, Open Group as the leader of EA standard, has to have challenge actions to answer to NIST 2002 report andJapan METI Government report using O-DA 2.0 solution guides with new view points and 9 Grids including Best
Practices of Test Systems, Agile-DevOps and Open Data lake among collaborative partners network.

The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

◼ NIST 2002 report warned us 70% of Software errors were fromArchitecture time but self recognized D2C error only 3.5% before
coding.
◼ Worst thing is 20.5% errors are detected at the Customer premises.
◼ ”IF D2C done at Architecture time , cost is X1 but If D2C ( Detect toCollect) at Customer site ,“ Cost & time is X30~X44 depending on
complexity.“Reason 1◼ Can we improve by having intra company review by Dependability
Architects ( TOGAF with ArchiMate plus O-DA 1.0 trained ) challenge toincrease 3.5% to Max 70%?
◼ If we increase D2C up 63.5%, Customer site incident % is going down
to 6.8% from 20.5%. Customer Sat should go up and 58% of Test cost
could be logically possible.
◼ Can we do it?

The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

◼ Upon Saison IS Co. President Mr. Uchida’s top down decision, TOGAF and ODA 1.0 to his Hulft product ‘ Data logistic Technology ) division ( now 35 certified
now over 280 people 12.5%).
◼ Hulft pre-release Quality review were traditionally executed jointly by ProductDevelopment division manger and Support service division manager but rather
Product led logical reviews.

Reason 2◼ So , Service division Director Mr. J . Yoshihara （TOGAF & ArchiMatecertified ）made offer to do “independent O-DA D2C assurance work” inaccordance to TOGAF ADM principle, in advanced to the formal pre-release
review meeting. He used The product division FS and independent quality
review intensively prioritized focus in line with Jun’s Support Service division’s

data frequency analysis of Call center claims, FAQ data, log tickets data stored
on the former releases in relation to what major product functions and its subfunctions by product version and release, operation configuration, places, allfrom customer centric pain point analysis views (CCRM).
The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

◼ After I reviewed Hulft 2nd POC results by 18 Dec. as 133% improved,,
also studied METI Report of Japan ICT system Incident report on2009,2010,2011 report on 2000 companies surveyed for all industries

including hardware and network and software (Application , DB andOS) and asking about the type of reasons of failures which gave me atriggering idea to create 9 Grids and Open Data Concept of O-DA 2.0.
◼ The difference from USA NIST 2002 report to METI report ,I judged
after comparative element analysis , all architecture related reasons are

Reason 3

smaller than USA by 10% which could be justifiable by adjusting thedifference of application complexity caused by higher new
application % of USA cases versus a fewer new but much hardware
conversion ratio is higher in Japan especially after 2008 financial shock.
◼ Japan EA education jumped from 2016, #34th country in the world bynumber of TOGAF certified but 2019 Jan. 1st, we, Japanese companies
world wide became total number 1059 and became No. 20th country
now and will be more.

The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

◼ 2nd Use case validation was executed in good result by our WG Task leader,
Yoshio Kawakami TCS-J,( who educated TOGAF almost equal to Saison SIco.,) presented at Denver on the “RPG to Java Conversion project” whichstarted 2016 and installed at customer on 2019 Jan, using completely 3rd party
reviewer approach ,only looking their final Architecture master book updated

2017 April, by 2 persons , only total 24 man hours review with O-DA 2.0 baseReason 4model, increased 16 % of D2C before coding up to 44% D2C out of 70% logicalmax .
◼ We proved by these two cases ,realistic assurance existed even without Gridsavailable yet.
◼ To go up 63.5% as our target, still 18.5% has to be further detected before
coding , thus we need to design effective 7~9 Grids which has to work with theprogress of EA Cycle as a inline process ,not as a batch assurance cases.
◼ That is our design goal.
The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

◼ New business case to justify TOGAF Based Governance Reviews bydata and view points with Grids.
◼ Vale for User, Value for Vender, Value for Society : For venders
Increasing the D2C incident at customer premises force the customers
SAT so badly down and customer trust on venders become critical ,which could result loosing their business.
◼ Some time it delay the cut over which could loosing customer’scompetitiveness and Vender ‘s bottom lines by spending un-Reason 5necessary ,redundant Muda tests comparing other vender’ using O-DA
2.0 having earlier D2C at the stage of Architecture phase.

The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

Leaders and Members8The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

Our LeadersJunkyo (Jack) Fujieda

Shuichiro Yamamoto

Shoji Kajita

Akira Fukushima

Founder, President & CEO, ReGIS Inc.

Professor of Nagoya University

Professor of Kyoto University

Advisor, ReGIS Inc

Kiichi Kawano

Yoshio Kawakami

Jun Yoshihara

Advisor, ReGIS Inc

Senior IT Architecture Leader
Tata Consultancy Services

Department Manager
SAISON INFORMATION SYSTEMS CO.,LTD
The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

Our Members
Tomohiko Tagami (Asahi Techneion Co.,Ltd)Riu Kondo (Tata Consultancy Services)

Makoto Yamaguchi (Asahi Techneion Co.,Ltd)

Taichi Hasegawa (Tata Consultancy Services)

Masaki Domukai (NTT COMWARE Corporation)

Kazuya Hirose (Tata Consultancy Services)

Takuya Inoue (NTT COMWARE Corporation)

Shingo Omata (Nippon Telegraph and Telephone
Corporation)

Takashi Kubota (NTT COMWARE Corporation)
Sho Saito (NTT COMWARE Corporation)
Takaaki Aoki (Kyoto University)
Hisaya Sakashita (LTS, Inc.)
Saki Miyata (LTS, Inc.)
Keisuke Nagae (SOMPO Systems, Inc.)
Nobuhide Kobayashi

Narumasa Suzuki (Fujitsu Limited)
Yu Aoki (Fujitsu Limited)

Nobuaki Kusunoki (Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd.)
Kensuke Saito (Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd.)Jiro Kanayama (Rabukasoft)
Hirobumi Kawamura (Rococo Co.,Ltd.)
Yoshihiko Tobe (Rococo Co.,Ltd.)

Kenchi Kobayashi

Daisuke Tadenuma (Rococo Co.,Ltd.)

Kyoichi Matsuzawa (IBM Japan, Ltd.)

Yoshifumi Miyahara (Rococo Co.,Ltd.)
Keiji Horie ((Rococo Co.,Ltd.)The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com