大分工業高等専門学校紀要

第 53 号(平成 28 年 11 月)

Teaching Noun Clauses and Adverbial Clauses Using the if- orwhen-Clause

Takayoshi ANAI
Dept. of General Education

Japanese learners of English are said to be relatively familiar with grammar. This is because
entrance examinations to universities require a high level of grammatical knowledge. However, there
are some typical grammatical errors which the learners continue to make. One of these errors is
confusion of the noun clause and the adverbial clause, both of which use the same subordinate
conjunction, if or when. This article attempts to present a rationale for an inductive way of teaching
noun clauses and adverbial clauses using subordinate conjunctions “if” and “when” in a Japanese EFL
setting.
Key Words: grammar, noun clause, adverbial clause, subordinate conjunction, if, when

1. CONTEXT
2. AIMS OF THE LESSON
The setting for this lesson is National Institute ofTechnology, Oita College. Students are aged
between 15 and 16, and class size is about 40
students. Students‟ level of English is intermediate.
They have studied English as a subject at juniorhigh school for three years (three hours per week onaverage) prior to entering the college.
After their entrance to the college, students study
English grammar in detail. The following arerelevant grammatical items students will alreadyknow before this lesson: basic word classes (nouns,verbs, adjectives, adverbs, and conjunctions),
phrases, five sentence patterns (SV, SVC, SVO,SVOO, and SVOC), transitive and intransitive
verbs, relative pronouns, and clauses (noun clauses,adjective clauses, and adverbial clauses).
The sentences which include either the if-clauseor the when-clause have not been presented in theteaching of a noun clause or adverbial clause so as
to avoid students‟ confusion, although they havelearned noun and adverbial clauses using othersubordinate conjunctions such as that, until, andbecause.
So far, the students have been involved in a
deductive way of grammar teaching in Japanese, so
this becomes the first time for them to experience
inductive teaching.

At the end of the lesson, students will bebetter able to: Understand how to distinguish between nounand adverbial clauses.
Understand that in an adverbial clause whichrefers to future or condition, the present
simple is used.

Write and speak with the correct adverbial
clause form when they refer to future orcondition.

3. INTENDED OUTCOMES OF THE
LESSON
By the end of the lesson, regarding sentencesof [the main clause + if- (or when-) clause], students
will be better able to: Understand that the if- (or when-) clause thatcan be moved to the top of the sentence
without making the rest ungrammatical is anadverbial clause.

- 7 -

Understand that the if- (or when-) clause thatcan be deleted out of the sentence without
making the rest ungrammatical is an adverbialclause.

大分工業高等専門学校紀要

第 53 号(平成 28 年 11 月)Understand that the if-clause where if can bereplaced by „whether or not‟ is a noun clause.

Set B: Sentences where the when-clauses areembedded.



Understand that the if- (or when-) clause
which is an object of a transitive verb is anoun clause.



Understand that the when-clause where whencan be interpreted as „when…, then‟ is anadverbial clause.



Understand that in an adverbial clause whichrefers to future or condition the auxiliary verb
will is not used.

a) Who cares when she will marry?
b) I‟ll phone you when I get there tomorrow.
c) Open your eyes when you are ready.
d) We don‟t know when he will come home.
e) I‟ll ask her when she will leave Tokyo.
f) You‟ll be disappointed when you know yourexam results.
g) It is difficult to say when the president will
arrive here.
h) We‟re going on holiday tomorrow. I will tell
you all about it when we come back.
i) He looks very different now. You won‟t
recognize him when you see him tomorrow.

4. TEACHING PROCEDURE
This inductive way of teaching is to be conductedin the following way.
(1) Review
Confirmation of the three clauses: noun clauses(functions as a noun), adverbial clauses (mainly
modifies a verb, adjective, and adverb), andadjective clauses (modifies a noun).

(3) Have learners study the sentences in each set, Aand B, and divide them into two patterns in each set.
Once they have tried, ask each group to divide thesentences again into two patterns by looking at theif- (or when-) clause.
(4) Have learners underline each if- (or when-)clause. Have learners try to work out the differencesin specific feature between the two patterns.
(5) Ask them what the difference between the twopatterns is. Have them realize that one of thepatterns does not have will in each sentence, and theother has will.

(Noun clause)
I think that it will be fine tomorrow.
(Adverbial clause)
I slept early because I was sleepy.

(6) Hand each group a different clue card (seebelow), A to F, and have them tell which clause is anoun clause or an adverbial clause in each groupbased on the clue card given.

(Adjective clause)
I saw a man who was wearing a funny hat.
(2) Divide the class into groups of six (G1, G2, G3,etc.). There are six students, S1 to S6, in each group.
Give each group two sets of sentences: Set A andSet B.
Set A: Sentences where the if-clauses are embedded.
a) I‟ll be happy if you meet me at the airport.
b) I don‟t know if it will rain tomorrow.
c) I wonder if he will agree with you.
d) Don‟t worry if I‟m late tonight.
e) I‟ll ask her if she will go to the concert
tomorrow.
f) You will be punished if you do anything wrong.
g) I‟m not sure if he will come back.
h) I won‟t go out if it rains tomorrow.
i) I‟m going out now. Can you take a message ifanybody phones?

Clue Cards
Note that in the real clue cards answers are notpresented.
Clue Card A
An if- (or when-) clause which can be moved to the
top of the sentence without making the rest
ungrammatical is (***** Answer: an adverbial)
clause.
Clue Card B
An if- (or when-) clause which can be deleted out ofthesentence
without
makingtherestungrammatical, is (***** Answer: an adverbial)
clause.

- 8 -大分工業高等専門学校紀要

第 53 号(平成 28 年 11 月)

Clue Card C
An if-clause which is an object of a transitive verb is(***** Answer: a noun) clause.

2. I wonder if he …….. (go) swimming tomorrow
3. I‟m going away for a few days. I‟ll phone you
when I …… (get) back.

Clue Card D
A when-clause which is an object of a transitive
verb is (***** Answer: a noun) clause.

5. RATIONALE
Clue Card E
An if-clause whose if can be replaced by „whether ornot‟ is (***** Answer: a noun) clause.
Clue Card F
A when-clause whose when can be interpreted as„when…, then‟ is (***** Answer: an adverbial)
clause.
(7) Rearrange groups so that all the S1s of eachgroup can make one new group, S2 another newgroup, and so on. Then have each student try toteach among the new group in English.
(8) Ask each group to report to the class.
(9) Write on the board the following, and explain therules: I‟ll ask her if she will come here tomorrow.
I‟ll ask her about it if she comes heretomorrow.

I‟ll ask her when she will come back.

I‟ll ask her about it when she comes backtomorrow.

(10) Have learners understand that a clause which
does not use will is an adverbial clause.
(11) Have learners understand that in an adverbial
clause which refers to future or condition, thepresent simple is used.

English is taught as a foreign language in Japan.
English grammar, therefore, plays an important rolefor Japanese learners of English to learn how to use
the language “accurately, meaningfully, andappropriately1)”. However, there are typicaldifficulties which the learners tend to experience
because of their first language background2). For
example, Japanese does not have the same idea ofpast, present and future tense that English does3),
which causes Japanese learners of English to misuse
English tense form.
The reason for choosing this particular example isthat most Japanese students often tend to
misunderstand the distinction between a noun clause
and an adverbial clause when both clauses include
the if- ( or when-) subordinate conjunction. Also,
grammatical questions to test whether applicants candistinguish between these two clauses often appear
in university entrance examinations4).
Among the three clauses (noun, adjective, andadverbial clauses), the adjective clauses arerelatively comprehensible to the Japanese learnersof English because they frequently practice themodification of the adjective clause to nouns when
they learn relative pronouns. The other two clauses,
however, seem to be extremely difficult, from myown teaching experience, especially when students
try to distinguish between a noun clause and an
adverbial clause, both of which use the same
conjunction if or when. For example, each
subordinate clause in the following sentences is an
if-clause;(12) Have students work with discrimination
exercises (see the following example).

I do not know if it will rain tomorrow.

Example

I will not go out if it rains tomorrow.

Q. All the following sentences are about the future.
Use will / won’t or the present simple.
1. I will ask the clerk some questions if he …….
(come) back.

Both if-clauses refer to the future; however, theif-clause in the second sentence does not use will but
uses the present simple rains. Most English
grammar books, furthermore, often state: “In anadverbial clause which refers to future or condition,
the present simple is used5)”. This simple- 9 -大分工業高等専門学校紀要

第 53 号(平成 28 年 11 月)

explanation causes students to become confused andthey still wonder why the second if-clause does notuse will despite the fact that it refers to the future.
Consequently, students who become confusedwith the distinction between the two clauses tend touse will even in the adverbial clause, for example: *I
will not go out if it will rain tomorrow. To address
this difficulty, I decided to investigate a better wayof teaching how to distinguish these clauses so thatlearners of English will not misuse English tense
forms.

4) e-Learning: meishisetsu to fukushisetsuchuu no jisei nochigai, Retrieved September 21, 2016, fromhttp://kou.benesse.co.jp/nigate/english/a13e2201.html,
2016.
5) Sougou eigo be - Voyage to English Grammar - New Edition,
Tokyo: Iizun-shoten, p.85, 2012.
6) Thornbury, S: How to teach grammar, Harlow, Essex:
Pearson Education, p. 54, 1999.

Thus, my teaching approach in this lesson isdifferent from the conventional Japanese approachin two respects. Firstly, while the traditional
approach attempts to explain the if- (or when-) noun
clause and the if- (or when-) adverbial clauseseparately just as English grammar textbooks do,
my approach teaches them at the same time, andpresents almost all the possible ways ofdistinguishing these two clauses in one lesson,which has never appeared in grammar textbooks inmy opinion. From my approach, learners will easily
be able to compare the features of the if- (or when-)noun clause with those of the if- (or when-)adverbial clause.
Secondly, while deductive ways of teaching havebeen dominant in traditional English grammar
lessons in Japan, this approach attempts inductive
teaching. I believe the inductive approach in thislesson will help learners to be „more attentive andmore motivated6)‟ when they look at two
syntactically similar sentences. Furthermore,engaging in communicative activities throughproblem-solving tasks and exchanging information
in English will better be able to raise students‟
consciousness regarding this problematic grammar
point.

REFERENCES
1) Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D: The grammar book:
An ESL/EFL teacher's course (2nd ed.) USA, Heinle &Heinle, p. 5, 1999.
2) Kennedy, G: Structure and meaning in English: a guide forteachers, Harlow, Essex: Pearson, p. 4, 2003.
3) Chew, J: The Japanese language, Retrieved August 26, 2006,
from Home Page of Website:
http://www.math.toronto.edu/jjchew/japanese/verbs.html,
2006.

- 10 -(Received September 30, 2016)