UNAFEI Linguistic Adviser’s Report
Opening Session
Topic One: Community Involvement in Law Enforcement
Topic Two: Community Involvement in the Prosecution of Crimes
Topic Three: Community Involvement in the Courts
Topic Four: Community Involvement in the Rehabilitation and Treatment of Criminal Offenders
Topic Five: Mobilizing the Community for Improved Criminal Justice Administration
Final Recommendations

Opening Session
A.

Opening Remarks

The Philippines-UNAFEI Joint Seminar on “Community Involvement in the Criminal Justice
Administration” commenced on December 5, 2001 in Manila, the Philippines. After the arrival of
distinguished guests and participants, the Seminar began with an invocation led by Mr. Bernando Calibo
and the playing of the national anthems of the Philippines and Japan.
Opening remarks were given by His Excellency Yoshihisa Ara (Ambassador of Japan), Mr. Mikinao
Kitada (Director of UNAFEI), Mr. Hideo Ono (Resident Representative, JICA) and Mr. Edgar Dula Torres(Commissioner of the National Police Commission) on behalf of the Honorable Mr. J. Lina, Jr. (Secretaryof the Interior and Local Government and Chairman of NAPOLCOM).
B.

Keynote Speech

The Seminar was privileged to have the attendance of the Guest of Honor, the Chief Justice of theSupreme Court of the Philippines, the Honorable Mr. Hilario G. Davide Jr. Chief Justice Davide delivereda keynote speech entitled, “Community Involvement in the Administration of the Criminal Justice System”.
Chief Justice Davide detailed how the judicial system of the Philippines is founded on a mixture ofcustomary law, Roman law and Anglo-Saxon law. He further explained how the success of the criminal
justice system relies on a strong community base and the involvement of the community in theadministration of justice is imperative in the struggle against crime.
It was argued by Chief Justice Davide that the community can assist in the prevention of crime andin the rehabilitation of offenders in a number of ways. Firstly, the community can reform offenders bywelcoming the truly repentant back into the community and not rejecting them solely because of theircriminal records. Secondly, the community can adopt programmes which highlight the evils of crime andthereby transform potential offenders. Also, the community and the police can develop a two way
information exchange system whereby the community provides the police with investigative leads and thepolice remain visible and trustworthy as is the situation in Japan.

—3—Topic One: Community Involvement in Law Enforcement
A.

Presentations

This topic was chaired by Ms. Celia S. Leones (Director of the Crime Prevention and Coordination
Service at the National Police Commission) and there were two presentations. The first paper, entitled“Dynamics of the Community in Law Enforcement”, was delivered by Director General Leandro R.
Mendoza (Chief of the Philippine National Police). The second paper, entitled “Community Involvementin Law Enforcement” was delivered by Mr. Masakatsu Okabe (Deputy Director of the Police Policy
Research Center, National Police Academy of Japan).
Mr. Mendoza stressed the need to understand and appreciate the dynamics of the community ingreater breadth. He highlighted three levels of community dynamics from the individual’s personal
conscience to the family unit and then onto the wider community (such as the neighborhood, towns andcities). Mr. Mendoza pointed out to the break up of the community as contributory to negativism,
pessimism, the lack of trust with each other and the fear of crime despite the great triad of masstransportation, mass media and mass communication. In the dormant sense of community, he considered
how the Philippine National Police had instigated the Community-Oriented Policing System (COPS) in
1994 that sought to combine the forces of the police and the community. He emphasized the crucial roleof the policeman in regenerating community spirit. He felt it essential that citizens are made to feel thatthey are stakeholders and are thus empowered to be responsive and flexible. He then looked at the resourcesof the Philippine police and gave the participants some statistics on the resources required by the police andthe resources actually available.
Mr. Okabe stated that an important point in dealing with the sudden increase in the number ofPenal Code offenses in Japan is community efficacy in the field of law enforcement. He specifically lookedat the role performed by community police officers in Japan. He gave a comprehensive introduction into
the Koban (police box) and Chuzaisho (residential police box) systems that have been established for morethan a hundred years. He emphasized how the Kobans and Chuzaishos act as “community safety centers,”
securing the safety of community life. Kobans and Chuzaishos are established in each sub-area of thejurisdiction of a police station, which is determined in consideration of day and night population, numberof households, area, administrative area, incidence of crimes, accidents, disasters and so on. Mr. Okabecovered some of the specific crime prevention activities in Japan that aim to promote community
involvement with the police. In particular, he considered local crime prevention associations, juvenile
support centers and the growing role of the private security business.
B.

Reactions

The reaction to the above presentations was given by Ms. Amparita S. Sta. Maria, Attorney andExecutive Director of the Ateneo Law School. Ms. Maria spoke of how there has been an apparent declineof community trust in the police. She forwarded some of her own research which demonstrated that there
is a growing public perception that the police and other governmental agencies within the criminal justicesystem are untrustworthy. She argued that in this climate, the responsiveness and cooperation of thecommunity is obviously affected. Ms. S. Sta. Maria further highlighted the problems of delay in thedisposition of cases. She said that the inaccessibility of the justice system helps explain the prevailing
apathy and complacency that the community has come to feel towards other pillars of the justice system.
She felt that the perception of the community towards law enforcers, prosecutors, judges and the institutions
identified as the criminal justice system has deteriorated over the years. She called for a real understanding
to be fostered between members of the community and law enforcement agencies in order that justice andpeace could be achieved.

—4—

C.

Open Forum Summary

A number of participants expressed their concern about how the media might in some way contributeto the negative image of the Philippine National Police (PNP). It was explained that the PNP has notinstitutionalized its relationship with the media and a good liaison between the police and the media isessential to encourage responsible reporting. Despite what the media might say about there being a climateof fear in the Philippines the streets are bustling until the early hours every night and Filipinos will always
tend to call the police in any type of emergency.
A number of questions were raised which sought to clarify the situation of the police in Japan. A
question was put from the floor as to whether government resources had a direct bearing on the effectivenessof the police in Japan. It was said that the government budget is only there to support police activities andpolice officers in Japan are very well instructed and motivated. The participants were informed that the
Chuzaisho system, whereby a wife assists the husband in his police duties, is very much a part of Japaneseculture. It was further explained that police officers, as public officials, tend to have the respect of the public
as this is part of the Japanese way of life. The starting salary of a police officer in Japan is about 200,000
yen a month and the chief police officer could expect to earn in the region of 20,000,000 yen a year. The
participants were interested to learn that private security firms are playing a bigger role in Japan but they
were informed that there were no penalties should businesses fail to install security systems.
A question was raised about the PNP’s activities regarding drug prevention. The PNP have been
more successful this year than any other in terms of confiscating drugs and arresting big drug dealers anddiscovering metamphetamine hydrochloride producing factories. In order to promote demand-reduction for
drugs, the role of non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) was recognized as playing a pivotal role incommunity awareness of drug problems.
A participant asked what the PNP was doing in trying to prevent police officers themselves falling
into criminal activities. Although a police officer’s financial predicament can never justify the act ofcommitting a crime, a policeman who is adequately supported by his salary might learn to love his work
better. The Seminar was informed that historically in the Philippines police officers have been very poorly
paid and only recently has Congress been persuaded to increase their salary to that of a teacher. Police
officers should be paid fairly for the job they do. Should citizens become aware of miscreant police officers
then they should report them to the National Police Commission (Napolcom) or the People’s Law
Enforcement Board (PLEB).
A participant acknowledged, with appreciation, the constitution of the Women’s and Children’s
Concern of the PNP, although the jurisdiction of this body covers only child abuse and rape cases. It wasobserved that the majority of crimes committed by children in conflict with the law are petty crimes liketheft that are handled by the Theft and Robbery Section of the PNP. A bulk of recidivism among the youth
usually comes from those who are not treated well in the police stations. For this reason, a request wasmade that the jurisdiction of the Women’s and Children’s Concern be expanded to include all crimes
committed against women and children.
An observation was made that in certain parts of the Philippines there is what can almost be described
as anarchy where vigilantism has responded to the current crime situation (for example, in Mindanao). In
these parts of the country the PNP are necessarily supported by the armed forces as the PNP has a dearth
in manpower and logistical resources. It was further stated that the PNP were opposed to local control overthe police and supported a national structure as crime is globalizing.
It was pointed out that some PNP officers have little understanding of their human rights obligations.
The PNP do not control their own training schools and, since their inception ten years ago, have taken
officers from the armed services and local police forces. There is a need for training to be institutionalized—5—

so that the rights of suspects and victims can be upheld. There are, at present, programmes between the
PNP and law schools where seminars are held on human rights awareness.

—6—Topic Two: Community Involvement in the Prosecution of Crimes
A.

Presentations

This topic was again chaired by Ms. Celia S. Leones and there were two presentations made. The
first paper, entitled “Community Involvement in the Prosecution of Crimes” was delivered by Mr. Nilo C.
Mariano (Assistant Chief State Prosecutor, Department of Justice, Manila, the Philippines) on behalf of Mr
J. Zuño (Chief State Prosecutor, Department of Justice, Manila, the Philippines). The second paper,“Community Involvement in the Prosecution of Crimes”, was presented by Mr. Yuichiro Tachi (UNAFEI
Professor).
Mr. Mariano spoke of how in international practice the criminal justice system consists of either fourpillars (law enforcement, prosecution, courts and corrections) or three pillars because prosecution is mergedwith courts. The Philippines stands differently in that it adds the community as the fifth pillar as history
has shown that the success of the criminal justice system depends on public participation. The key to a
successful investigation lies in the community, specifically, the witnesses who owe a civic duty to testify.
It is recognized in the Philippines that many witnesses do not testify because of sheer indifference, for fearof reprisals or for economic reasons. This is why the Witness Protection Security and Benefit Act wasenacted which should encourage witnesses to come to court and testify under the Witness Protection,
Security and Benefit Program.
Mr. Tachi gave an overview of the Japanese system of prosecution. He spoke of how publicprosecutors have the exclusive power to decide whether or not to prosecute. One of the uniquecharacteristics of the Japanese legal system, however, is the procedure known as “suspension of prosecution”
whereby a prosecutor can drop cases despite the existence of enough evidence to secure a conviction. Suchsuspensions of prosecution will occur where the victims have been compensated. As this procedure could
be open to abuse, each district court has a Committee for Inquests into Prosecution that is comprised ofeleven members of the local electorate. These committees can request the respective Chief Prosecutor toreinstate a prosecution if they so find that a prosecution has been wrongly suspended. Mr. Tachi further
stated that in May 2000 the Diet enacted laws which enable video-link examination of witnesses, abolishes
the time limit for the filing of sex offence complaints, allows statements of opinions in trial proceedings andallows the victim or victim’s family to fully observe the trial and have access to the full trial records anddocuments. He also suggested that out of all the actors in the criminal justice system, public prosecutors inJapan are the least understood. In order to reduce the misunderstanding surrounding prosecutors, highschool students have been invited to prosecutors’ offices and these events have been covered by the media
so increasing the public’s knowledge of the prosecution system.
B.

Reactions

Mr. Leonard S. De Vera (Attorney, Integrated Bar of the Philippines) and Ms. Katrina C. Legarda(Attorney) gave their reactions to the above presentations.
Mr. De Vera commented on two basic differences between the Japanese and Philippine justicesystems. Firstly, he noted that public prosecutors have wide investigative powers unlike in the Philippines
where all evidence gathering is left solely to the police. Secondly, he noted that committees for inquests
into prosecution do not exist in the Philippines and ordinary Filipinos have very little say in the prosecution
process. He suggested that both practices could be adopted in the Philippines if the right infrastructure isin place. He further stated that one of the main hurdles in getting the community involved in the criminal
justice system is that witnesses refuse to testify. Unless the Philippine criminal justice system can makeevery citizen feel confident that he or she will be protected by the law and that the wheels of justice are
speedy and fair then citizen participation in the criminal justice process will never be realized—7—

Ms. Legarda argued that the community could only truly participate when justice is not only done
but is also seen to be done. There is a need to reassure the public of the certainty of arrest, prosecution,and conviction of criminals in order to elicit public trust and confidence in the criminal justice system. She
stated that prosecutors, as well as the police, should be open to public scrutiny and they must exercise
integrity at all times. All pillars of the criminal justice system must be transparent in order for thecommunity to have respect for the system and become involved in it. Ms. Legarda said prosecutors should
be more aware that petty offences are still heavily penalized and they should also be more sensitive tochildren in conflict with the law. She also asked the PNP to treat female desk officers with more respect
and called for the resources to be made available so that DNA evidence could be made commonly available.
C.

Open Forum Summary

A question was raised as to whether the Filipino Commission on Human Rights (CHR) should begiven prosecutorial powers. This was seen as problematic as the difference between a human rights
violation and a violation of the Penal Code was very hard to distinguish. For example, inflicting physicalinjuries on a person is both a violation of human rights and an offense under the Revised Penal Code. The
CHR, nonetheless, can conduct fact-finding investigations and then refer cases to the police or the
Department of Justice for investigation and prosecution.
The role of defense counsel was also considered to be vital to delivering real criminal justice where
the constitutional rights of the accused were safeguarded. The Public Defenders Office (formerly the Public
Attorneys Office) is the only agency in the Department of Justice that is mandated to assist an accused
person should he or she wish to be represented by a government lawyer. In this sense the role of the Public
Defender’s Office was suggested as a possible sixth pillar of the criminal justice system in the Philippines
as it could not be lumped with the prosecution pillar.
Questions were raised in relation to the employment of former offenders in Japan. It was explainedthat the government will not employ someone who has served a sentence of imprisonment but that anoffender who has received only a fine can be employed. As for the private sector, employment of exoffenders depends on the individual company’s policy.
The violation of the code of ethics by some media practitioners in the coverage of children in conflictwith the law and children as victims of crime was raised as an issue that needs to be addressed. Although
the media might not mention the name of the child, other facts might be reported such as the names of theparents, exact addresses and other circumstances leading to the identity of the child. It was stated that under
the new rules of the court in the Philippines, media companies could actually be sued for contempt should
they publish details of a minor and such action was urged by a member of the panel.
There was considerable discussion about whether women were sexually discriminated against in the
PNP. It was alternatively suggested that the PNP did and did not adhere to an equal opportunities policy
for women officers. There was further discussion on the differing abilities of certain members of the
judiciary.

—8—Topic Three: Community Involvement in the Courts
A.

Presentations

This session was chaired by Mr. Severino H. Gaña Jr., Assistant Chief State Prosecutor, Manila, thePhilippines and there were two papers presented. The first paper, entitled “Community Involvement in the
Courts” was delivered by Mr. Justice Antonio M. Martinez (Vice-Chancellor of the Philippine Judicial
Academy, Supreme Court of the Philippines, Manila). The second paper, delivered by Mr. Toru Miura(Professor and Chief of Training Division, UNAFEI) was also entitled “Community Involvement in the
Courts”.
Mr. Martinez looked at mediation in the courts, the Katarungang Pambarangay system andcommunity mediation while highlighting the huge backlog of cases in the Philippines. Mr. Martinez
expounded on the pilot projects that have been taking place in the Philippines since 1999. The 1997 Rulesof Civil Procedure, requires the civil courts to consider alternative modes of dispute resolution. Mr.
Martinez explained that the Katarungang Pambarangay is an innovation of the Philippine judicial systemand that it provides for the resolution of disputes at the barangay level. This is a localized system ofmediation, conciliation and arbitration. It is designed to obtain just, speedy and inexpensive settlements, topreserve Filipino culture of reaching amicable settlements and to relieve the courts of an overload of cases.
In the Philippines, the Mediation Network for Sustainable Peace has been a pioneer in resolving communitybased mediation. The barangay justice system is not part of the justice system but the judiciary recognizes
it will have positive effects on the administration of justice. He added that the local courts can initiate public
education and information programmes on how the barangay justice system works.
Mr. Miura explained that at present, in Japan, some laypersons are selected by the courts from among
the general public to take part in judicial proceedings as conciliation commissioners, judicial commissioners
and Family Court counselors. The Family Court has a unique system whereby if a juvenile does not haveproper parental or guardian support the court will select a member of the public as an attendant who ischarged with taking care of the juvenile during the court procedures. Relatively speaking, the public has
limited opportunities to participate in criminal procedure in Japan because all cases are heard and tried byprofessional judges. Japan did in fact have a jury system but this only lasted from 1923 until 1945. Mr.
Miura said that community involvement in the courts is one of the current topics of debate in Japan since
the Justice System Reform Council submitted its proposals to the Cabinet in June 2001. One of the
proposals was for laypersons to participate in criminal trials in a judicial capacity similar to the lay judge
system in Continental Europe. These so-called saiban-in would act as lay justices, sitting with career judges,
and a final decision could not be made either by only the lay justices or by only the career judges. Mr.
Miura was very optimistic that Japan is trying to realize the participation of ordinary people in criminal trials
in the near future. Mr. Miura also gave a comprehensive outline of the court structure in all legal
proceedings in Japan.
B.

Reactions

Mr. Rene V. Sarmiento (Professor of Law, Polytechnic University of the Philippines) and Mr. James
Marty Lao Lim (National President of the League of Barangays) gave their reactions to the above
presentations.
Mr. Sarmiento remembered the words of Abraham Lincoln that, “the worst compromise is better
than the best litigation”. He was particularly concerned at the great increase in litigation in the Philippines
since 1985 from a total number of 323,282 cases to a total of 797,721 cases in 2001. Mr. Sarmiento statedthat these figures cried out for the use of mediation procedures at the community and barangay level where
peer pressure acts as a strong impetus towards dispute resolution. He further argued that restorative justice—9—

approaches that have been adopted in Australia, Canada and New Zealand should be embraced and there
should be training courses on mediation and on human rights.
Mr. Lim Mr. Lim talked of how many people did not understand the barangay structure which
established a new system of justice in 1991. It is estimated that this system saved almost 1 million pesos
in litigation fees in 2000. Mr. Lim pointed out some of the problems in the barangay system such as; there
is a need for proper training as a number of cases are mismanaged in the barangay (for example, sometimes
rape cases come before the barangay which should never happen), lawyers often want cases to leave thebarangay as soon as possible so they can continue litigation at the courts, favorable behavior has been
observed towards friends or relatives and there have been problems with enforcing agreements that havebeen reached. In closing, Mr. Lim reiterated the need for education, information campaigns and more
focused training for those people who are handling the system.
C.

Open Forum Summary

It was discussed that there was a great need for public education on mediation processes. The
Philippine Judicial Academy has been traveling all over the country educating the public, like lawyers,
community-based associations and media with respect to the efficiency and efficacy of mediation.
Pamphlets are also available from the Academy.
A question was raised in relation to the abolition of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court in thePhilippines in the 1970s. It was pointed out that domestic violence and violence against children cases are
now dealt with by the Family Court where a social welfare worker compiles a preliminary report for the
court. There are difficulties, however, in that inadequate funding hampers the effectiveness of the Family
Court.
It was pointed out that there are currently about 347 mediators at the Philippine Judicial Academy
who serve on a pro bono basis. They must be at least 30 years old, be of good character, hold a bachelors
degree and be able to speak Filipino and English. One of the problems perceived to be encountered inmediation is that lawyers believe this will have an impact on their income and tend to be apathetic towards
alternative forms of dispute. Lawyers should not be excluded from mediation and often try to assist
mediators in reaching agreements. Parties in mediation in the Philippines are given 30 days to see if they
can settle. If no agreement has been reached within 60 days then the dispute goes to court.
The issue of compensation for those remand prisoners who are found innocent was raised. The
Philippines’ Board of Compensation of the Department of Justice only provides minimal compensation of
10,000 pesos.
One participant put it to the floor that certain victimless crimes and archaic laws should be
decriminalized. The Philippines’ Judicial Reforms Office considers this and makes recommendations to theSupreme Court.
It was proposed that the English magistracy system could serve as a useful role model in thePhilippines. The Japanese Committee for Inquests into Prosecution were seen as laudable in bringing
community members into the prosecution process.
It was clarified that in Japan, lay commissioners are appointed by the Family Court judges. They
should be more than 40 years of age and have broad knowledge and experience. Their opinions must be
highly respected. The Japanese system of inquests into prosecutions was further elucidated upon. It wasstated that the committees of inquests into prosecutions can only make recommendations if they believedthat prosecutions were not properly suspended.

— 10 —

Topic Four: Community Involvement in the Rehabilitation and Treatment of
Criminal Offenders
A.

Presentations

This session was again chaired by Mr. Gaña and there were two papers presented. The first paper,
entitled “Community Involvement in the Rehabilitation and Treatment of Offenders” was presented by the
Honorable Mr. Ramon J. Liwag (Undersecretary, Department of Justice, the Philippines). Mr. Kenji
Teramura (Professor and Chief of Research Division, UNAFEI) presented the second paper which wasentitled “Community Involvement in the Rehabilitation and Treatment of Criminal Offenders”.
Mr. Liwag stressed that community’s participation in crime prevention represents the public’s
acceptance of its shared responsibility with the government. The root causes of crime such as
unemployment, poverty and illiteracy are not within the control of any one component of the criminal justicesystem and so it becomes the responsibility of the community to help prisoners overcome these problems.
He identified the role the community can play in crime prevention by looking at the rehabilitation andtreatment programmes provided by the government and in particular by the biggest prison in the Philippines,
New Bilibid Prison. Mr. Liwag found that the community gives a great deal of support to the efforts of
New Bilibid Prison to promote spiritual and moral growth. He believed, however, that the community has
not paid enough attention to inmates’ needs when they make the transition from prison to life outside. Oneof the laudable initiatives which had recently been implemented was the Philippines/Japan Halfway House,
next to Bilibid Prison which was created with the assistance of the Asia Crime Prevention Foundation,
UNAFEI , the Nagoya West Lions Club and other NGOs in Japan. There are now plans to establish
government supported halfway houses in six administrative regions throughout the country.
Mr. Teramura stated that the importance of community involvement has long been recognized by
the Asian and Pacific Conference of Correctional Administrators (APCCA) which chose this issue as thetheme for the twentieth ACCA. He went on to look at community involvement in corrections specificallyin Japan. Japan has a system of volunteer probation officers drawn from the community. There are anumber of organizations such as the Women’s Association for Rehabilitation Aid, the Big Brothers andSisters Association, Volunteer Visitors, Chaplains and Cooperative Employers which are community groups
that befriend offenders and assist them in their vocational pursuits and wider rehabilitation. Japaneserehabilitation also includes accommodating offenders in halfway houses, providing material aid andfinancially supporting other rehabilitation organizations under the supervision of the probation office. The
Japanese government supervises and provides financial support to these half-way houses. Previous
participants at UNAFEI have voiced some of the major obstacles to community involvement – for example,
lack of public interest, security risks and shortage of volunteers.
B.

Reactions

Reactions to the above presentations were given by Mr. Rod G. Cornejo (Assistant to President of
GMA 7), Mr. Taha M. Basman (Secretary-General of the Philippine Islamic Council) and Mr. Dante L.A.
Jimenez (Chairman of Volunteers against Crime and Corruption).
Mr. Cornejo considered that the Government of the Philippines does recognize the growth ofcommunity involvement in providing moral support within the criminal justice administration but sometimes
the community does not receive a great deal of support in its efforts to rehabilitate ex-offenders. Employers
cannot be blamed for not employing ex-offenders because of the stigma that surrounds them but how canthis stigma be removed? Mr. Cornejo argued that there were two major influences in the Philippines – theChurch and the media. The Church provides a number of programmes aimed at supporting inmates suchas the Jail Trust Programme which provides financial loans to prisoners and their families. He stated the— 11 —

church workers are welcomed into prisons as they bring harmony to the prisoners.
Mr. Basman stated that this seminar was held at an opportune time as it was Ramadan for Muslims
and Christmas was approaching for Christians. He said there had recently been an upsurge in one type of
criminality and that was terrorism and this needs priority concern. The fight against terrorism could only
succeed if there was mutual respect for different faiths, mutual understanding, praying in each other’s
presence, listening to each other’s dialogue and inter-faith meetings supported by the government.
Mr. L.A. Jimenez stated that the organization he represented was firstly concerned with catching theperpetrators of crime and secondly their rehabilitation. He congratulated both the speakers and said that
there should be a partnership between the government and the community in administering criminal justice.
He discussed the concept of half-way houses in Japan and said that they should be introduced in thePhilippines
C.

Open Forum Summary

A question came from the floor about the propriety of the government receiving donations fromprisoners for the construction of facilities in the New Bilibid Prison. The case of Congressman Jalosjos wascited. This has been investigated by the Department of Justice and it was established that the only
construction facility donated by the incarcerated Congressman was a tennis court which is now being usedby the inmates. It was suggested that a sports programme should be supported by the community to makeuse of the facility. The government does, however, discourage such donations as they might impede upon
the fairness and equality of treatment for all inmates. A non-governmental view was that prison conditions
effect prisoners’ rehabilitation and, although not defending Congressman Jalosjos, inmates were paying fortheir crimes by being incarcerated and should not have to face deplorable conditions.
The issue of prisoners continuing to make illegal drug transactions was highlighted. It was said thatrecently correctional institutions have endeavored to search for, and seize, all cellular telephones held byinmates. There was a particular problem in Muntinlupa Prison but this was more because of architectural
reasons than administrative reasons. This prison was built in 1946 and is congested by about thirty percent.
Almost all amenities have been removed and there is no visiting area so visitors have to go inside the prison
camp in order to see their relatives and friends. Such a set up makes it extremely difficult to monitor theentry of contraband.
It was pointed out that Japan has maintained a relatively stable number of volunteer probation officers
for the last fifty years which contrasts starkly with the position in the Philippines. One of the main reasonsfor the drop in the number of volunteer probation officers in the Philippines is that they no longer have theirtraveling fees reimbursed. It appeared that the volunteers who were recruited were probably as needy as
the probationers, parolees and pardonees themselves. The present situation therefore calls for a shift in the
public’s attitudes from one of fear of offenders to one where it is realized that withholding support andassistance for offenders could in effect encourage further criminality.
The issue was raised that prisoners should be seen as they are – people who have committed a wrong
doing but who can change with the help of the community. Indeed total rehabilitation can only happen
within the community. The criminal must be separated from his crime in order for him to move on within
his community. It was further suggested that the media should be more active in opening the eyes of the
public on the plight of prisoners and instilling awareness on their role in rehabilitating offenders.
There was a call for a law compensating those injured or killed in their efforts to prevent crime. It
was pointed out that there is a Victim’s Compensation Programme which provides a flat 10,000 pesos tosuccessful claimants.

— 12 —

Topic Five: Mobilizing the Community for Improved Criminal Justice
Administration
A.

Presentations

This session was chaired by Ms. Lilia C. Lopez (Judge, Br. 109, Regional Trial Court) and there were
three presentations. The first paper, entitled “Mobilizing the Community for an Improved Criminal Justice
Administration” was delivered by Ms. Mia Meñez-Zafra (Chairperson of the Community Pillar
NAPOLCOM Technical Committee on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice). The second paper entitled,“Mobilizing and Networking the Community through Volunteer Probation Officers and their Associations
in Crime Prevention and the Rehabilitation of Offenders” was presented by Ms. Mikiko Kakihara (Professor,
UNAFEI). Mr. Keichii Aizawa (Deputy Director of UNAFEI) delivered the third paper which was entitled,“Mobilizing the Community for an Improved Criminal Justice Administration”.
Ms. Meñez-Zafra opined that in recent years criminal justice systems have started to discover the
power and potential of working with the community. For example, in the USA, many prosecution offices
are becoming more community focused, basing themselves in local neighborhoods. She argued that there
are three essential and complementary core components of community policing; community partnership,
problem solving and change management. Central to these components are the requirements ofcommunication, cooperation, collaboration and change. Community courts are now a growing trend inmany countries. Though there are different models, they have common characteristics. It was suggested
that a community-focused court should practise restorative justice, treat parties in disputes as real individuals
rather than abstract legal entities and utilize community resources in the adjudication of disputes.
Incarceration has become a drain on government resources and there is a need to search for less costly
alternatives such as community corrections. Experience and research have shown that community
institutions are the first line of defense against disorder and crime and community involvement is democracyin action.
Ms. Kakihara explained that expectations for volunteer probation officers’ activities have beenbroadened and raised in recent years in Japan, as the community was entering a stage of drastic change.
Ms. Kakihara detailed the situation where volunteer probation officers and their associations, with a proudhistory of more than 50 years, were now expected to not only help and guide individual offenders, but also
perform their roles fully in mobilizing, networking and organizing the community for effective crime
prevention. Her paper also noted that there is a growing concern about juvenile delinquency in Japan andthis necessitated the recreation of a healthy community. One of the rehabilitation programmes that volunteer
probation officers are typically involved in is the Social Participation Activities Programme which aims tocultivate a juvenile’s sociability rather than penalize the juvenile. Ms. Kakihara also mentioned forms ofcrime prevention activities such as public relations activities on the street, public symposia about
delinquency problems, small discussion meetings and fund raising activities for rehabilitation aid which arecarried out by volunteer probation officers in cooperation with local governments and other bodies
concerned in their respective communities. She further talked about a number of cooperative employers
who register with probation offices and offer employment to offenders under probation or parole whileknowing of their past records. Volunteer probation officers play a leading role in finding new cooperative
employers and organizing them in the community.
Mr. Aizawa’s paper looked at two systems of crime control that serve the dual purpose of deterring
law breaking and of apprehending, punishing and treating those who commit crimes. These systems areformal (e.g. the police, the judiciary, etc.) and the informal (e.g. parents, schools, religious bodies, etc.)
Without informal social controls the criminal justice system would cease to function effectively.
Governments have begun to explore more direct ways of improving informal social controls and suchactivity falls under the general heading of “crime prevention.” He considered United Nations activities andinitiatives in the field of community involvement in crime prevention. He explained that at the Tenth United— 13 —

Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, held in Vienna in 2000, aworkshop on such a theme was held. It was emphasized that the United Nations, by way of adopting
resolution 55/59 of December 2000 (the “Vienna Declaration on Crime and Justice: Meeting the Challengesof the Twenty-first Century”), has clearly expressed its political will to encourage the community to become
involved in matters of crime prevention and criminal justice. Mr. Aizawa further looked at a United Nations
Expert Meeting that was held in Buenos Aires in February 1999 which considered the theme of community
involvement in crime prevention.
B.

Reactions

Reactions to the above two presentations were given by Mr. Ray Dean Salvoza (Consuelo Zobel
Alger Foundation) and Mr. Florante A. Seril (Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities).
Mr. Salvosa said that the presentations had been comprehensive in addressing the issues that needed
to be addressed. He noted that the Volunteer Probation Officer System in Japan was a commendable
institution and allowed the Probation Service to function effectively. The Japanese culture is different tomost cultures as it is homogeneous and perhaps this encourages better community participation in thecriminal justice administration. It was particularly noted that in Japan 4,600 employers were registered in
April 2000 for the purpose of employing ex-convicts in order to give them a second chance. The problemof juvenile delinquency was particularly felt in the Philippines where 39 percent of children do not evenattend school and attention should be prioritized here as it is better to build children than repair men.
Mr. Seril argued that volunteerism in the community cannot be forced but only organized throughthe goodwill of the community. He believed that there had often been problems in gaining the attendanceof government representatives at criminal justice training programmes in the Philippines. He further statedthat corruption in the Philippines was an everyday event and this causes disillusionment in the community.
C.

Open Forum Summary

It was stated that the Philippines has a Volunteer Intervention Programme which has existed for thelast two decades. The situation of volunteer probation officers (VPOs) in Japan was clarified. They havethe status of non-permanent government officials but they are not paid for their services. Such volunteers
tend to be recruited on the recommendation of current volunteer probation officers. Their work can include
holding meetings in the community about programmes for juvenile delinquents. VPOs also play a leadingrole in obtaining work for ex-offenders through their contacts in the community.
A question was aired as to how the community can feel encouraged to participate in crime prevention
and detention if they live in fear of criminals that are armed. It was suggested that the community cannot
be expected to be at the forefront of crime prevention if there is an obvious threat to life.
The growing concern towards juvenile delinquency is quite alarming considering that the Philippines
does not have the system, the facilities and the trained personnel to cope with the problem. Delinquent
offenders are getting younger and younger and if intervention is not made then the crime problem willcontinue to deteriorate. One panelist informed the participants that there is a pending bill in Congress called
the Comprehensive Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Bill that, if passed, will not only save thecost of incarceration but also the cost of the crime in terms of money and life. The philosophy of the Billis one of restorative justice.
Many of the participants agreed that the concept of Community Oriented Policing (COPS) was amajor initiative to reduce crime. In 15 cities in the USA, where COPS initiatives had been introduced, major
crimes had dropped by as much as fifty percent. COPS is unique because it turns the police officer into acommunity service officer.

— 14 —

COPS has been suggested as an initiative since 1990, in the Philippines, but there have been a numberof implementation problems. One of these problems is that police chiefs tend to be transferred every coupleof years and so once they have become familiar with their locality they move on. It was mooted that under
new local organizations, the mayors, as deputies of Napolcom, exercise operational supervision and control
and so even if chiefs of police are being changed, the mayors can still continue with the established agendas.
The counter argument to this was that this would still mean the police are not localized and this hinders any
COPS. It was agreed that COPS requires a tripartite partnership from the government, the community andthe national police.

— 15 —

Final Recommendations
These recommendations were the manifestation of the five group workshop sessions that had been
held towards the end of the Seminar. They were presented to the Joint Seminar and adopted as the final
recommendations. They are as follows:1.

Appropriate measures should be undertaken to promote the coordination and cooperation of law
enforcement agencies, prosecution, courts and corrections vis-à-vis the community through more
effective sharing of information, for example, by strengthening the National Crime Information
System (NCIS).

2.

Public trust and confidence in the criminal justice system should be further developed throughcommunity involvement in the operations and workings of each criminal justice agency.

3.

In order to attain full community involvement in the criminal justice administration, criminal
justice agencies should observe the principles of transparency, integrity and impartiality.

4.

Adequate legislation should be enacted to strengthen community involvement and participationin crime prevention and the administration of criminal justice through such programmes as the
Volunteer Probation Programme (VPP), Volunteer Information Programme for Youth (VIPY), andthe Community-Oriented Policing System (COPS).

5.

The active participation of witnesses in the prosecution of cases should be assured by amending
the existing law like the Witness Protection, Security and Benefits Programme.

6.

Congress, local government councils, and community-based organizations (NGOs and private
sectors, among others) should be encouraged to provide personnel and resources to correctional
agencies in order to achieve the full implementation of correctional activities.

7.

Credibility of all agencies in the criminal justice system should be improved through continuingcapability training, seminars, etc. in order to attain swift and fair dispensation of justice.

8.

The active participation of the community should be ensured in national policy-making bodies asa means through which agencies of government can work with the community.

9.

Effective measures should be undertaken to build and strengthen community-based groups, where
seminars/training/dialogues should be undertaken for the purpose of enhancing cooperation andcoordination between law enforcement agencies and prosecutors.

10. The Department of Justice should encourage the community to assist in the recruitment ofqualified and competent lawyers for the prosecution service.
11. Public information education programmes through responsible media should be enhanced in order
to increase community awareness on crime prevention and the treatment of offenders.

— 16 —