JCFoS Feedback Survey summary report
Response Summary

CountPercent

Total Responses

44100.0%

Complete Responses

44100.0%

Incomplete Responses

00.0%

Participant Country

CountPercent

Canadian Participant

2147.7%

Japanese Participant

2352.3%

Times answered

44100.0%

Times skipped

00.0%CountPercent

Planning Group Member

1022.7%

Introductory Speaker orSpeaker

14

31.8%

General Participant

2045.5%

Times answered

44100.0%

Times skipped

00.0%

AverageCountPercent

Participant TypeRatings

ExceededMeets
Below
No rating/coexpectations expectations expectations
mmentMeeting Format25 (58.1%)

18 (41.9%)

0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)2.58

43100.0%

Length of time given topresentations

12 (27.9%)

31 (72.1%)

0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)2.28

43100.0%

Length of time given to
discussion

16 (37.2%)

21 (48.8%)

6 (14.0%)0 (0.0%)2.23

43100.0%

Quality and interest ofscience covered

26 (60.5%)

16 (37.2%)

1 (2.3%)0 (0.0%)2.58

43100.0%

Quality of the session
speakers

27 (62.8%)

16 (37.2%)

0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)2.63

43100.0%

Quality of the poster
session9 (21.4%)

25 (59.5%)

6 (14.3%)

2 (4.8%)

2.08

42

97.7%

Your opportunity toparticipate

22 (51.2%)

17 (39.5%)

4 (9.3%)0 (0.0%)2.42

43100.0%Venue

38 (88.4%)

5 (11.6%)

0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)2.88

43100.0%

Times answered

43

97.7%

Times skipped

12.3%

Range of session topics

CountPercent

Too broad to facilitate
learning, discussion and/orinteraction

24.5%

Appropriately broad innature to facilitate learning,
discussion and/orinteraction

4193.2%

Too narrow to facilitate
learning, discussion and/or

12.3%

interaction
Times answered44

100.0%

Times skipped

00.0%

Which of the following
activities were useful toyou and your research?

Yes, very useful

Potentially
usefulNot very useful

AverageCountPercent

Information frompresentations in your own
discipline

27 (62.8%)

12 (27.9%)4 (9.3%)

2.53

43

97.7%

Information frompresentations in otherdisciplines

20 (45.5%)

23 (52.3%)

1 (2.3%)2.43

44100.0%

Information and/or
connections made frominformal discussions

32 (72.7%)

12 (27.3%)

0 (0.0%)2.73

44100.0%

Information and/or
connections made from theposter session

17 (39.5%)

23 (53.5%)

3 (7.0%)2.33

4397.7%

Times answered

44100.0%

Times skipped

00.0%CountPercent

Very useful2659.1%

Useful1534.1%Marginally useful

36.8%

Times answered

44100.0%

Times skipped

00.0%CountPercent

Very useful

3477.3%Useful920.5%

Marginally useful

12.3%

Times answered

44100.0%

Times skipped

00.0%

Usefulness of website

Was the symposium useful to widen your scientific perspective in general by thinking
about issues related to fields other than your own?

As a result of thesymposium, do you
expect to:Yes

PossiblyNo

AverageCountPercent

Conduct new/different
research?

10 (22.7%)

31 (70.5%)

3 (6.8%)1.16

44100.0%

Follow-up and/or work withnew contacts/collaborators
within or closely related toyour field?

22 (50.0%)

18 (40.9%)

4 (9.1%)1.41

44100.0%

Follow-up and/or work withnew contacts/collaborators
in a discipline other thanyour own?

18 (40.9%)

20 (45.5%)

6 (13.6%)

1.27

44

100.0%

Follow-up and/or work withnew contacts/collaborators
in your home country?

22 (50.0%)

21 (47.7%)

1 (2.3%)1.4844100.0%

Follow-up and/or work withnew contacts/collaboratorsin another country?

12 (27.3%)

25 (56.8%)

7 (15.9%)

1.1144100.0%

Pursue new funding
opportunities?

8 (18.2%)

25 (56.8%)

11 (25.0%)

0.93

44

100.0%

Work on new publications
using insights andknowledge gleaned fromthe symposium or with newcollaborators?

7 (16.7%)

25 (59.5%)

10 (23.8%)

0.934295.5%

Times answered44

100.0%

Times skipped

00.0%CountPercent

Yes4093.0%No37.0%Times answered

4397.7%

Times skipped

12.3%

Count

Percent

Yes1043.5%

No1356.5%

Times answered2352.3%

Times skipped

2147.7%

Based on your experience at this meeting, would you attend another symposium of thisformat again?

Are you interested in organizing a session as a Planning Group Member (PGM) in a future
Frontiers of Science Meetings?

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)