15 Aug 2023

The 15th SIGLOC-online: Pre & Post Self-Evaluation Results
COIL Promotion OfficeOsaka Metropolitan University, Japan

1. Information on respondents:● Respondents are 45 participants who completed the 15th SIGLOC-online program held from 3rd to
28th July 2023.
● Respondents evaluated their abilities related to Social Innovation before and after the program witha rubric having four (4) levels (Evaluation sheet is attached as a Reference).
● Respondents’ countries/regions in residence and universities
County/Regionin Residence

Number ofRespondentsUniversityIndonesia

University Gadjah Mada1Malaysia

Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM)

1Philippines

Central Mindanao University

1

Philippines

Lyceum North Western University

7

Philippines

Mariano Marcos State University

22

Philippines

Technological University of the Philippines

1

Philippines

University of Mindanao

1

TaiwanNational Central University

1

ThailandSaint-Petersburg State University

1

VietnamPham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine

1

ZambiaUniversity of Zambia

8

TotalTotal

2. Overall result● Below are the “Overall average scores of respondents by question (ability)”.

45

3. Results by Question (Ability)
Q1: Ability to acquire basic knowledge
Criteria

Ability for basic understanding of problems

No. of RespondentsPre

Post

Level 1
Acceptable

To be able to find and review literature on social sustainability

31

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to select appropriate literature on social sustainability

13

Level 3Good

To be able to select appropriate literature on social sustainability
and explain its significance and usefulness in a way that others canunderstand.

2634

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to select appropriate literature on social sustainability
and explain its significance and usefulness in a way that others canunderstand at a high level

157

3.18

3.04

Average Score-0.13
Q2: Ability for basic understanding
Criteria

Ability to discover/identify issues

Level 1
Acceptable

No. of Respondents
PrePostTo be able to logically develop an argument for a position based ona variety of literature and data

2

1

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to evaluate an argument based on a particular position
from different perspectives

67

Level 3Good

To be able to have a holistic perspective of the various logicalconstructs in various positions and clarify their mutual relationships

2231

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to have a holistic perspective of the various logicalconstructs in various positions and clarify their mutual relationships
at a high level

156

3.11

2.93

Average Score-0.18

Q3: Ability to discover/identify issues
Criteria

Ability to find creative solutions

Level 1
Acceptable

No. of Respondents
PrePostTo be able to explain to others about your own experiences and thecurrent situation in exisiting communities from the perspective ofsustainability

11

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to understand the sustainability of others’ communities
from multiple perspectives, including your own

712Level 3
GoodTo discuss and discover what is needed to improve thesustainability of your own community from multiple perspectives

2412

Level 4
Excellent

To discuss and discover what is needed to improve thesustainability of your own community from multiple perspectives ata high level

13

20

3.09

3.13

Average Score+0.04

Q4: Ability to find creative solutions
Criteria

Ability to implement solutions(Collaboration/ Collective impact)

Level 1
Acceptable

No. of Respondents
PrePostTo be able to understand existing communities from a global
perspective and discover real-world examples that can be used as
reference in order to improve their sustainability

10

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to find approaches and apply them in order to improve
the sustainability of existing communities based on a variety ofreal-world examples

91

Level 3Good

To be able to evaluate and improve approaches for applying
various real-world examples in order to improve the sustainability ofexisting communities from an objective and holistic perspective

2222

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to evaluate and improve approaches for applying
various real-world examples in order to improve the sustainability ofexisting communities from an objective and holistic perspective at ahigh level

1322

3.04

3.47

Average Score+0.42
Q5: Ability to implement solutions
Criteria

Leadership

Level 1
Acceptable

No. of Respondents
PrePostTo be able to identify issues and find creative solutions based oninteraction with others

20

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to make the most of interactions with others when you
identify issues and find creative solutions

618

Level 3Good

To be able to propose specific approaches for creative activities
through interaction with others

26

15

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to propose specific approaches for creative activities
through interaction with others at a high level

1112

3.02

2.87

Average Score-0.16
Q6: Leadership (Number of the respondents for Post-course was 37 only.)No. of Respondents
Criteria

Leadership

Level 1
Acceptable

Pre

Post

To be able to collaboratively work with others to complete assignedtasks

10

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to achieve given goals as a group member

1316

Level 3Good

To be able to achieve given goals as a group leader

1618

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to generate goals the group needs to achieve, sharethose goals, and work together to accomplish them

1511

3.00

2.89

Average Score-0.11

Q7: Contributions (Number of the respondents for Post-course was 37 only.)
Criteria

No. of RespondentsLeadership

Pre

Post

Level 1
Acceptable

To be able to make a minimal contribution to the outcome of thegroup work

1

1

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to make a sufficient contribution to the outcome of thegroup work

4

3

Level 3Good

To be able to make more than sufficient contributions to theoutcome of the group work

1926

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to make excellent contributions to the outcome of thegroup work2115

3.33

3.22

Average Score-0.11

Reference: SIGLOC-online Self-Evaluation Form
Pre & Post course Self-Evaluation Form: Please read carefully each criteria and description for each levelin the table below. Choose the most appropriate one to describe your current level of understanding.

Criteria

Level 4
Excellent

Level 3
Good

Level 2
Satisfactory

Level 1
Acceptable

Q1

Ability to acquirebasic knowledge

To be able to selectappropriate literature
on social sustainability
and explain itssignificance andusefulness in a waythat others canunderstand at a highlevel

To be able to selectappropriate literature
on social sustainability
and explain its
significance andusefulness in a waythat others canunderstandTo be able to selectappropriate literature
on social sustainability

To be able to find andreview literature onsocial sustainability

Q2

Ability for basic
understanding

To be able to have aholistic perspective of
the various logicalconstructs in various
positions and clarify
their mutual
relationships at a highlevel

To be able to have aholistic perspective of
the various logicalconstructs in various
positions and clarify
their mutual
relationships

To be able to evaluate
an argument based ona particular position
from different
perspectives

To be able to logicallydevelop an argument
for a position based ona variety of literatureand dataQ
3

Ability to
discover/identify issues

To discuss anddiscover what isneeded to improve thesustainability of yourown community frommultiple perspectives
at a high level

To discuss anddiscover what isneeded to improve thesustainability of yourown community frommultiple perspectives

To be able tounderstand thesustainability of others’communities frommultiple perspectives,including your own

To be able to explain toothers about your own
experiences and thecurrent situation in
exisiting communities
from the perspective ofsustainability

Q4

Ability to findcreativesolutions

To be able to evaluate
and improve
approaches for
applying various
real-world examples inorder to improve thesustainability ofexisting communities
from an objective andholistic perspective at ahigh level

To be able to evaluate
and improve
approaches for
applying various
real-world examples inorder to improve thesustainability ofexisting communities
from an objective andholistic perspective

To be able to findapproaches and apply
them in order toimprove thesustainability ofexisting communities
based on a variety ofreal-world examples

To be able tounderstand existing
communities from a
global perspective anddiscover real-world
examples that can beused as reference inorder to improve theirsustainability

Q
5Ability toimplement
solutions

To be able to propose
specific approaches forcreative activities
through interaction withothers at a high level

To be able to propose
specific approaches forcreative activities
through interaction withothers

To be able to make themost of interactions
with others when you
identify issues and findcreative solutions

To be able to identify
issues and findcreative solutions
based on interaction
with others

Q6Leadership

To be able to generategoals the group needs
to achieve, share thosegoals, and work
together to accomplish
them

To be able to achieve
given goals as a groupleaderTo be able to achieve
given goals as a groupmemberTo be able tocollaboratively workwith others to complete
assigned tasksQ7

Contributions

To be able to makeexcellent contributions
to the outcome of thegroup work

To be able to makemore than sufficient
contributions to theoutcome of the groupwork

To be able to make asufficient contribution
to the outcome of thegroup work

To be able to make aminimal contribution tothe outcome of thegroup work