The Japanese Journal of American Studies, No. 25 (2014)
Copyright © 2014 Kyoko Matsunaga. All rights reserved. This work may be used, with thisnotice included, for noncommercial purposes. No copies of this work may be distributed,
electronically or otherwise, in whole or in part, without permission from the author.

Leslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent
in the American Southwest

Kyoko Matsunaga*

Introduction
Two years after the fall of Saigon, the event that marks the end of theVietnam War, Leslie Marmon Silko published her first novel, Ceremony(1977). The novel focuses on Tayo, a Laguna Pueblo man and World War II
veteran who suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) andemotional estrangement at home in New Mexico after his scarring
experiences in the Pacific. In that the novel foregrounds the recovery of a
traumatized World War II veteran through a series of evolving indigenous
ceremonies, the impact of World War II on the text is undeniable; and so too
is the impact of the Cold War. In Ceremony, while connecting transpacificatomic sites (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) to the American Southwest, Silko
expresses her objections to the politics and rhetoric of the Cold War that
promoted not only nuclear colonialism in the American Southwest but also
American factionalism and expansion that pushed the world toward a
nuclear apocalypse.1
The politics and rhetoric of the Cold War—of which the Vietnam War
was one chapter—was supported and reinforced by the discourse of thenuclear arms race and the actual production and use of nuclear weapons.
*Associate Professor, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies

67

68

Kyoko Matsunaga

The American Southwest was strategically chosen for such nulcear
militarism and industrialism in the early 1940s. During World War II,
following the establishment of Los Alamos National Laboratory for the
Manhattan Project, known as Project Y, the first detonation of an atom bomb
occurred in New Mexico at the Alamagordo Bombing and Gunnery Range(currently known as the White Sands Missile Range) on July 16, 1945.
Shortly after the onset of the Cold War, uranium mining began in the FourCorners region, the intersection of New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, andColorado. This uranium-rich area, called the Grants Uranium Belt, contains
two-thirds of US uranium deposits.2 Adjacent to the Four Corners area, thestate of Nevada has also suffered from US nuclearism. Between 1951 (whennuclear testing started to shift from the Pacific to Nevada) and 1992 (whennuclear testing was suspended indefinitely), the US government conducted
more than 928 above-ground and below-ground nuclear tests at the Nevada
Test Site.3 More recently, in 2002, Yucca Mountain in the southwestern
portion of the Nevada Test Site became the subject of legal disputes after
being designated as the nation’s only high-level nuclear waste dump by the
George W. Bush administration.4
When we look into the history of nuclearism in the American Southwest,
what soon becomes obvious is the indigenous presence. As environmentalsociologist Valerie L. Kuletz points out, nuclear geography overlaps
indigenous geography at almost every phase of nuclear production and use.
Los Alamos is located near Pueblo lands, and the first atom bomb wasdetonated near the Mescalero Apache reservation. Since uranium was
discovered on Navajo lands in Arizona in 1941, uranium mining and millinghas been conducted on land belonging to Navajo, Hopi, Pueblo, and Ute
peoples. In the 1950s, the federal government seized lands in Nevada from
Western Shoshone and Southern Paiute to use for nuclear experiments, andlater for storage of nuclear waste.5 The presence of indigenous people in the
nuclearized American Southwest is conspicuous; throughout most of theCold War period, however, indigenous inhabitants were obscured by the“preexisting settler discourse about desert lands as barren wastelands.”6
Although made invisible, indigenous inhabitants of the American
Southwest have witnessed, written about, and spoken out against
nuclearization of the region in poetry, essays, and novels. For example,
reflecting on his experience as a uranium miner in 1960–61, Simon J. Ortiz,an Acoma Pueblo poet, critiques nuclear exploitation of indigenous people
and their lands in Fight Back: For the Sake of the People, For the Sake of
the Land (1980). Juxtaposing the two conditions of New Mexico asLeslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent in the American Southwest

69“homeland” and “a National Sacrifice Area,” Ortiz contexualizes the historyof nuclearism in the American Southwest via the longer history of theregion’s colonization since the middle of the sixteenth century, when the
Spanish conquered Pueblo territory. In Fight Back, as the title of thecollection suggests, Ortiz resists the colonial discourse that has attempted
for centuries to erase the indigenous presence in the American Southwest.7
Like Ortiz, Leslie Marmon Silko critiques the destruction caused by
nuclearism, referring particularly to colonial experiences in the Southwest.
Silko’s first two novels, Ceremony and Almanac of the Dead (1991),
explicitly portray the impact of uranium mining on the territory and peopleof Laguna Pueblo, while going beyond the colonial experiences of theSouthwest to reveal the apocalyptic features of the Cold War era that seemed
to place the world forever on the edge of total destruction. Silko does notyield to such forces, however. In this essay, along with attempting to situateLeslie Marmon Silko’s first two novels as literary dissent against the impact
and legacy of nuclearism in the American Southwest during the Cold War, I
also examine the alternatives she offers as a counternarrative to thepredominant Cold War discourse of the time.

I. Breaching Bounds: Barbed-Wire Fences and Dissent
The protagonist of Ceremony, Tayo, is a World War II veteran who
undertakes a series of ceremonies to recover from his “illness,” depicted asa consequence of Euro-American colonization of the Southwest and his
military service in the Pacific. To aid in his recovery, Tayo engages invarious types of rituals including a scalp ceremony performed by a traditonal
Laguna medicine man, Ku’oosh, and a sandpainting ceremony conductedby a “mixedblood” medicine man, Betonie. Tayo’s ceremony—his healing—includes a quest involving a search for lost cattle and encountering Ts’eh, amysterious and mythic woman, who empowers him to return to the Laguna
community. Essential for Tayo’s ceremony to succeed is his recognizing thepattern of destruction: how the production and use of nuclear weapons in
the American Southwest is part of larger colonial forces in the Nuclear Age.
Around the end of the novel, just before Tayo comes to this realization,
he witnesses the devastating impact uranium mining operations had on the
Cebolleta land grant (located northeast of Paguate, New Mexico) on Lagunaland. As described in the novel, the US government did not tell “what kindof mineral” they were looking for but paid $5,000 to the land-grantassociation so they could drill test holes in secret.8 The area had been

70

Kyoko Matsunaga

damaged previously by overgrazing and erosion after the northeastern
portion of the grant was seized by the territorial government of New Mexico.
As the project progressed, the mining operation at the Cebolleta land grant
led to further ecological deterioration, causing floods and exacerbating landerosion. The operation profited the US government and the mining
corporations while leaving nothing for the community and the land but“barbed-wire fences,” a “watchman’s shack,” a “hole in the earth,” and thedeath of “the last bony cattle.”9This is a realistic depiction of the nuclear colonization of the Southwest
and the legacy of exploitation, particularly the destruction of regional
culture, socioeconomic structures, and the environment. A brief history of
uranium mining operations in Laguna Pueblo from the 1950s to the early
1980s confirms this. Following the “discovery” of uranium deposits near
Paguate on November 8, 1951, Laguna leaders leased approximately 7,000
acres of 418,000 total acres of Laguna Pueblo land to the Anaconda
Corporation. Between 1952 and 1981, Anaconda retrieved 22 million tonsof uranium ore from nine underground mines and three open pits, one ofwhich is the Jackpile-Paguate mine, once the world’s largest open-pit
uranium mine. The tribe received royalties in exchange for its leases tomining operations (although payments were less than 1% of the total profits
made by Anaconda and, later, Atlantic Richfield), and many Laguna
residents worked as miners, which dropped the pueblo’s unemployment
from around 70 percent before the mine to 20 percent.10 As Ward Chuchill
and Winona LaDuke point out, Laguna Pueblo became “one of the ‘richer’
all-round native groups in the country by the early- to mid-1960s” after it
shifted from a land-based economy (ranching and farming) to a wage-earner
economy dominated by the mines.11 However, benefits from the mines were
only short term, and the long-term costs were high. After mining operations
closed, the companies left “a gaping crater” and “piles of virulently
radioactive slag”; unemployment returned to over 70 percent; andwidespread radioactive contamination of the water supply made it difficult
for the Laguna Pueblo people to return to a land-based economy.12
By using phrases such as “hole in the earth” and the death of “the lastbony cattle,” Silko accurately depicts the environmental and socioeconomic
consequences Laguna Pueblo faced. She repeatedly mentions “barbed-wirefences” when describing the transformation of Laguna land: in fact, sheuses the phrase four times in the two paragraphs that describe the brief
history of uranium mining on the Cebolleta land grant. Barbed-wire, ofcourse, is a powerful metaphor for modern ideas of progress and civilization,

Leslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent in the American Southwest

71

as well as twentieth-century barbarities. This image evokes the taming of
the West, modern warfare, and detainment or segregation (as can been seenin the case of Japanese internment camps in the United States and Canada
during World War II).13
In the context of nuclear history, barbed-wire fences suggest a more
complicated reality: radioactive contamination that cannot be contained.
While the fences reflect the separation of land from people (or more
precisely the exploitation of indigenous land and people), they are officially
put up to keep people away from the dangerous (and secret) mining
operations. But, of course, the impact of the nuclear industry cannot be
contained by the fences. In a memorable chapter of Terry Tempest
Williams’s Refuge: An Unnatural History of Family and Place (1991),
entitled “The Clan of One-Breasted Women,” Williams and nine otheractivists slip through the barbed-wire fence at the Nevada Test Site in an actof “civil disobedience” to protest bomb testing. While the barbed-wirefence symbolically marks the source of the calamities befalling her family
and community living downwind from the Nevada Test Site, Williams
transcends or erases boundaries that superficially contain the damage
associated with the nuclear weapons industry.14
In a way that prefigures Williams’s “trespass,” Tayo crosses an emblematicbarbed-wire fence when he enters an abandoned uranium mine.15 This act
not only signifies a rejection of the contemporary idea of “progress,” war,and segregation but also Tayo’s entrance into the country marked by nuclear
colonization. Tayo’s grandmother, who witnessed a flash in the southeasternsky from the atom bomb detonated at White Sands on July 16, 1945, once
asks Tayo, “Why did they make a thing like that?”16 Although Tayo could
not answer his grandmother’s question immediately, at the abandoned
uranium mine, he comes to understand that the “flash” his grandmother
witnessed was part of the larger pattern of destruction. Crawling through thebarbed-wire fence, Tayo heads for the uranium mine shaft, and from there
he looks toward the places where processed uranium ore ends up. Three
hundred miles to the southeast is Trinity Site, where the first atom bomb
was detonated. Deep in the Jemez Mountains are the top-secret laboratories,
and only a hundred miles northeast is Los Alamos, where scientists gathered
during the war to produce and develop the atom bomb.17 At the entrance tothe mine shaft, Tayo experiences a revelation about the nuclear connections
emanating from this place:
There was no end to it; it knew no boundaries; and he had arrived at the

72

Kyoko Matsunaga

point of convergence where the fate of all living things, and even theearth, had been laid. From the jungle of his dreaming he recognized
why the Japanese voices had merged with Laguna voices, with Josiah’s
voice and Rocky’s voice; the lines of cultures and worlds were drawn
in flat dark lines on fine light sand, converging in the middle ofwitchery’s final ceremonial sand painting. From that time on, humanbeings were one clan again, united by the fate the destroyers planned
for all of them, for all living things; united by a circle of death thatdevoured people in cities twelve thousand miles away, victims who
had never known these mesas, who had never seen the delicate colorsof the rocks which boiled up their slaughter.18
Tayo realizes here that nuclear colonialism of the Southwest reflects thethreat of destruction that the atom bomb poses to the world, and it explains
why Tayo repeatedly identifies Japanese strangers with his family members
from Laguna. When an American soldier kills a Japanese soldier in thePhilippine jungle during the war, Tayo sees his uncle Josiah’s face in theJapanese soldier’s. Ironically, Josiah dies while Tayo is in the Pacific,
leaving unrealized a project he had with Tayo to breed and raise Mexican
cattle. After the war, at the train depot in Los Angeles, Tayo mistakes aJapanese boy for his cousin Rocky who died in the Philippine jungle. Tayo
has blamed himself for his cousin’s death.
On a superficial level, these instances reveal Tayo’s “guilt” for leaving
Laguna to join the army, but as Silko suggests in the above passage, they
expose fundamental connections between Laguna and Japan: territories
victimized by the production and use of nuclear weapons. Just as Tayo
travels as a soldier from Laguna Pueblo to the Philippines, the nuclear
landscape reaches from Laguna Pueblo to Japan in the form of atom bombs:
the drastic changes the nuclear industry wrought on the American Southwest
have impacted regions far removed, even across the Pacific Ocean.
Although Silko depicts transpacific nuclear connections specific to WorldWar II, America’s expansion into Asia during the Cold War is reflected in
Ceremony. While the novel features what happens to Tayo after World War
II, the scenes in the Philippine jungle evoke images of the Vietnam War.
Notably, Tayo’s grandmother’s question—“Why did they make a thing likethat?”—is answered only after Tayo returns to Laguna and finally recognizes
the impact of uranium mining on Laguna Pueblo land. In other words, withher publication of Ceremony during the Cold War era, Silko revealed thecontemporary state of nuclear colonialism and American expansionism that

Leslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent in the American Southwest73

had been kept secret under the name of “national security.” Tayo’s descentinto the uranium mine then marks Silko’s dissent against American Cold
War policy and its nature of concealment.
Terry Tempest Williams comes to a similar realization after being told by
her father that a recurring dream she had about a “flash of light in the nightin the desert” was not a dream but an actual bomb she witnessed while herfamily was driving home to Utah from Riverside, California, on September
7, 1957.19 Williams notes that although above-ground atomic tests in Nevada
were “common . . . in the fifties,” the political climate in the United States
did not allow residents to recognize the “deceit” they had been living under:“The Korean War was raging. McCarthyism was rampant. Ike was it, andthe cold war was hot.”20 In 1988, Williams breached the barbed-wire fenceof the testing site to break the silence that endangered her family andcommunity. Similarly, Tayo crosses barbed-wire fences in Ceremony tomanifest Silko’s protest against Cold War ideology through which citizens’
lives are “protected” (read “threatened”) by permitting nuclear militalism
and industrialism in the American Southwest and promoting American
expansionism around the globe.

II. Witchery and Subversion of the Colonial Narrative
In an earlier excerpt from Ceremony, referring to “witchery’s final
ceremonial sand painting,” Silko emphasizes that radioactive contamination
crosses boundaries of race and naitonality, making human beings “one clan”
that shares a common destiny of destruction: “From that time on, humanbeings were one clan again, united by the fate the destroyers planned for allof them.”21 Williams makes a similar claim when she enters the Nevada Test
Site “on behalf of the Clan of One-Breasted Women.”22 While both writers
use “clan” as a metaphor to evoke an image of a common familial unit, inCeremony, “clan” is an indication of a larger pan-tribal narrative that could
be used as a counterforce against the destroyers embodied by colonial forces
and the threat of apocalyptic destruction in a nuclear age.
In addition to the clan, witchery has long been a part of southwestern
tribal culture. While the idea of witchery existed among southwestern tribes
for a long time, a profound connection between witchery and the colonial
impact on tribal culture in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries has
been recognized by several scholars. In Keresan Texts (1928), noted
anthropologist Franz Boas introduced a traditional Pueblo oral story of“witches.”23 Although it was told to him in 1919, it existed much earlier in74

Kyoko Matsunaga

Pueblo regions, including the Acoma and Laguna Pueblos. Likewise,
Shamoon Zamir (1993) points out that the practice and violence of witchcraftin the Southwest drastically increased when the Navajo people wereconfined to a reservation in the late nineteenth century. Later, when the
Great Depression of the 1930s and early 1940s profoundly affected people’s
lives, witchery experienced another revival. As Zamir suggests, witchery
was used among Navajo and Pueblo communities to deal with the pressuresof colonialism, including the imposition of the national economy.24
This explains why in Ceremony witchery is depicted as a signifier of both
tribal narratives and contemporary colonial influences: as the novel
progresses—as the witchery narrative advances—the impact of colonialism
in the American Southwest is revealed. In “Healing via the Sunwise Cycle
in Silko’s Ceremony,” Edith Swan quotes Silko’s own comments aboutwitchery in the text: “In the novel, I’ve tried to go beyond any specific kindof Laguna witchery or Navaho witchery, and to begin to see witchery as a
metaphor for the destroyers, or the counterforce, that force which countersvitality and birth. The counterforce is destruction and death.”25 As Silkosuggests here, the tribal narrative of witchery in Ceremony extends beyond
the traditional definition of witchery. In fact, the destructive nature of thewitchery narrative in Ceremony is often associated with the deadliest
colonial force, in particular, the production and use of atomic weapons,created through an unnatural fragmentary technology—splitting theatom—a science defined by the discrete locations and activities that makeup the Manhattan Project: from the first controlled nuclear reaction at the
University of Chicago (on December 2, 1942) to the detonation of the firstbomb at Trinity Site in Alamogordo, New Mexico (on July 16, 1945).26
Images of “splitting” or “separation” permeate the Nuclear Age. At theonset of the era, the government and scientists chose the “remote barren
west” for nuclear facilities and test sites, separating the area from the otherparts of America, while the indigenous population and their land wererendered “others” for “national sacrifice.” Then, the military-industrial
complex severed indigenous inhabitants from their land, disconnecting
uranium ore from the earth and contaminating the area. In the course of an
explosion, the atom was split to produce enormous energy. The actual
production and employment of nuclear weapons during the Cold War echoes
the motif of separation, fragmentation, and atomization.
Images of separation and fragmentation are also evident in Silko’s
narrative. The violence and brutality Tayo sees in Emo, another World War
II veteran, is deeply connected with these images: Emo’s penchant for “big

Leslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent in the American Southwest

75

mortar shells that blew tanks and big trucks to pieces,” “jagged steel flakes
that exploded from the grenades,” and teeth removed from “the corpse of aJapanese soldier” mirrors the tropes of “mutation” and “amputation” in theage of modern technology.27 The pathology of modern warfare and violence,
epitomized by Emo, aggravates Tayo’s psyche, scattering his self like “whitesmoke” and severing his connection to his community and the land.
Tayo’s physical and psycological separation from Laguna relates to theimages of destruction and death depicted in the witchery narrative. In one ofthe poems inserted in Tayo’s story, witches gather to show off their charms
and powers by displaying big cooking pots with “dead babies simmering inblood/circles of skull cut away all the brains sucked out,” while otherwitches open their skin bundles with “cinders from burned hogans where
the dead lay” or “whorls of skin/cut from fingertips.”28 Phrases such as “cutaway,” “sucked out,” “cut from,” and “sliced from” reflect the fragmented
modern world in which the strongest power is revealed as “separation” of“white skin people” from the land.
Silko consistently emphasizes colonialism’s detrimental impact—
including that of modern warfare—on indigenous culture. Nevertheless, she
attempts to subvert the colonial forces imposed on southwestern tribes by
incorporating them into the witchery narrative. As discussed earlier,
witchery has been shaped by colonial circumstances. Silko presents it aspart of the diverse tribal narrative in Ceremony; witchery symbolizes not
only the devastating colonial forces but also the survival of native culture in
hybrid forms. It represents, in other words, part of the vitality and continual
evolution of tribal narratives. In an important passage from the novel, a
medicine man, Betonie, explains to Tayo how witchcraft tricks Navajo andPueblo people into ascribing destruction to white people. Betonie tells Tayothat white people and European culture are part of the tribal narrative, notthings outside the Pueblo imagination:“This is the trickery of the witchcraft,” he said. “They want us tobelieve all evil resides with white people. Then we will look no further
to see what is really happening. They want us to separate ourselvesfrom white people, to be ignorant and helpless as we watch our own
destruction. But white people are only tools that the witchery
manipulates; and I tell you, we can deal with white people, with theirmachines and their beliefs. We can because we invented white people;
it was Indian witchery that made white people in the first place.”29

76

Kyoko Matsunaga

By subsuming “white people” and “their machines and their beliefs” into
the tribal narrative of witchery, Betonie teaches Tayo that evil resides notoutside but within the communal imagination. In this way, Tayo is able todeal with the seemingly inconceivable idea of destruction embodied in theatrocity of contemporary warfare.
Betonie’s idea that evil resides within the communal imagination reflects
one of the characteristics of Laguna narrative. In Yellow Woman and a
Beauty of the Spirit, Silko refers to the connection between the uranium
mines and Laguna oral narratives:
The Laguna people have not witnessed changes to the land without
strong reactions. Descriptions of the landscape before the mine are as
vivid as any description of the present-day destruction by the open-pit
mining. By its very ugliness and by the violence it does to the land, theJackpile Mine insures that, from now on, it, too, will be included in thevast body of narratives that makes up the history of the Laguna people
and the Pueblo landscape. And the description of what that landscapelooked like before the uranium mining began will always carryconsiderable impact.30
Here the impact of uranium mining on Laguna territory is undeniable, but
Silko does not submit to a totally apocalyptic interpretation of thetransformed landscape. Instead, she attempts to incorporate the pattern of
human pathologies, including colonization and nuclear threats, into a patternof the larger Laguna narrative that is deeply connected with the tribal
landscape. “Storytelling,” Silko writes, “had the effect of placing an incident
in the wider context of Pueblo history so that individual loss or failure wasless personalized and became part of the village’s eternal narratives aboutloss and failure, narratives that identify the village and that tell the people
who they are.”31 Silko suggests here that, by contexualizing a landscapealtered by uranium mines through Laguna Pueblo oral narrative, its impact
will be less tragic, making the existence of the uranium mines only a part—though a significant part—of Pueblo culture and history.
In Ceremony, as a rhetorical tactic of subversion, Silko uses the structureof the Laguna narrative to absorb linear, apocalyptic thinking into a wider,circular understanding. This enables Tayo or the local community toreinterpret the imposition of destructive nuclear colonization on their own
terms. Storytelling, in this way, becomes an empowering device that
supports the voices of survivors in a nuclear age.

Leslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent in the American Southwest

77

III. Sterling’s Descent into the Mineshaft
More than ten years after her first novel, Silko returned to the nuclearizedSouthwest in her second novel, Almanac of the Dead. Like Tayo whoreaches a site disfigured by the nuclear mining industry after passing
through a barbed-wire fence, Sterling, at the end of Silko’s second novel,crawls through a barbed-wire fence and reaches an abandoned uranium
mine:
Sterling made his way up a sandy hill and then slid down the crumbling
clay bank of a small arroyo. He tore a cuff on his pants crawling
through the barbed-wire fence that marked the mine boundaries. Ahead
all he could see were mounds of tailings thirty feet high, uranium waste
blowing in the breeze, carried by the rain to springs and rivers. Herewas the new work of the Destroyers; here was destruction and poison.
Here was where life ended. What had been so remarkable about thereturn of the giant snake had been how close the giant snake was to themountains of tailings.32
Sterling’s recognition of the Destroyers parallels Tayo’s understanding ofwitchery. While in Ceremony the destroyers’ (or witchery’s) doings are
represented by the violence of contemporary warfare and the ongoing
effects of nuclear colonization, in Almanac of the Dead, the new work of the
Destroyers (or sorcerers, called Gunadeeyahs) is understood as the evil
after-effects of modernization and the ambiguous future prefigured by agiant stone snake figure appearing near the uranium waste piles. Symbolized
by tearing the cuff on his pants, Sterling’s descent into the mine is morechallenging and less heroic than Tayo’s. The fact that he had not paid muchattention to the old people’s stories prevents him from connecting everything
clearly at first. But gradually Sterling starts to remember: the old people’s
protest against opening the mine, the first atomic explosion at Trinity Site,
the Japanese incinerated by the bombs, and “how fierce the Mexican tribes
were–how quickly and casually they had killed.”33 Sterling remembers,“Tucson was Mexico.”34
Evoking Tayo’s revelation at the end of Ceremony, in Almanac of the
Dead Silko depicts the devastating effects the nuclear industry wrought
upon the Laguna community during the Cold War. When the United Statesrequired uranium for new weapons in 1949, tribal elders were deeply
concerned and strongly opposed mining: “The old-timers had been dead set

78

Kyoko Matsunaga

against ripping open Mother Earth so near to the holy place of theemergence.”35 However, the US government overruled the opposition, andthe tribal council had to go along with the decision. After all, the mines
offered jobs to the local people, including World War II veterans who cameback looking for work, and there were not many other opportunities on thereservation. While uranium mines profited multinational corporations andthe American government, Laguna Pueblo “became the first of the Pueblos
to realize wealth from something terrible done to the earth.”36
As Silko describes, the objections of the “old-timers” were not unfounded.
When the mines were closed, the corporations left without restoring theland. The short-term profits the mining industry passed on to a few membersof the community led to long-term environmental, socioeconomic, andcultural destruction shared by the entire community.37 Sterling, in a way,
epitomizes the tribe’s complicity. In the novel, a stone snake figure had been
discovered near the uranium mine after the mine opened near Paguate
village at the onset of the Cold War era. When a film crew visits Laguna
Pueblo, Sterling is appointed Laguna’s film commissioner “to keep the
Hollywood people under control.”38 Because Sterling cannot keep
Hollywood crew members away from the sacred great stone snake, he isousted from Laguna Pueblo. Although Sterling avoids implicating himself
in the controversy over the mine, he cannnot escape blame for failing toprotect the stone snake from the Hollywood film crew. Sterling insists that
“nothing had actually been stolen or removed,” but the tribal council sees it
differently and blames Sterling for betraying their trust.39 Sterling’s
unintentional collusion with the Hollywood crew members reflects thecomplicity of the Laguna people who could not protect Laguna from mining
operations. While Silko recognizes the complicity of tribal residents, sheputs more blame on the capitalistic nuclear industry and the government
agencies for their myopic and deceptive practices that had such a devastating
impact on the impoverished reservation.
While Tayo witnesses the modern pathology in the Pacific, it is in Tucson,
where drug abuse, illegal organ selling, child pornography, rape, and murdertake place, that Sterling witnesses the destructive and violent forces ofcontempoary America. After his return from Tucson, Sterling heads for theuranium mine where the giant stone snake sits. Although he regrets that hedid not listen more carefully to what Aunt Marie and the old people used to
say about “a connection the giant snake had with Mexico,” he eventuallycomes to recognize that the violence in Tucson is the continuation ofviolence initiated by the sorcerers (Gunadeeyahs) or Destroyers hundreds

Leslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent in the American Southwest

79

of years before Europeans arrived in Mexico.40 Just as Tayo realizes that thecontemporary colonial forces are part of the witchery narrative, Sterlingcomes to comprehend that the violence in Tucson is linked to the violencecreated by the sorcerers, embodied by such historical figures as Cortés andMontezuma, who “robbed graves for human flesh and bones to make theirfatal ‘powers.’”41 Nevertheless, Silko views the uranium mines, which“devoured entire mesas,” as the embodiment of the most powerful work ofsorcerers.42

IV. The Giant Stone Snake and International Alliances
Just as the witchery narrative transcends continents in Ceremony, thestone snake in Almanac of the Dead goes beyond the regional; it crosses
geographical, temporal, and cultural boundaries. The stone snake Silko
describes in the novel is based on an actual biomorphic configuration
discovered in spring 1980 near the base of piled uranium tailings. Silko
explains in Yellow Woman and a Beauty of the Spirit how the Laguna
residents refused to restrict the interpretation of the stone snake’s meaning:“There had been attempts to confine the meaning of the snake to an official
story suitable for general consumption. But the Laguna Pueblos go on
producing their own rich and continuously developing body of oral andoccasionally written stories that reject any decisive conclusion in favor ofever-increasing possibilities.”43 In other words, the stone snake lends microand macrovisions or, in Silko’s words, “multiple meanings,” to her
narrative.44 Almanac of the Dead encourages similar possibilities ofinterpretation. While introducing different interpretations of the snake (forexample, some argued that the snake carried a message that the people who
made the mine had won), Silko uses this divine snake spirit as a means toconnect Native America to other indigenous populations around the globe:
In the Americas and in Africa, the people loved and worshiped thegentle giant Damballah, or Quetzalcoatl, or Ma ah shra true ee, Divine
Snake of the Beautiful Lake. Maybe the Old Testament Garden of
Eden story is the first strike by northern tribes against the religion of
the Africans to the south and their worship of the great snake,Damballah. Those who loathe snakes have been brainwashed by the
Old Testament. Even ordinary snakes are spirit messengers to the spirit
beings and Mother Earth.45

80

Kyoko Matsunaga

In the Judeo-Christian context, snakes have often been associated with“evil” just as the nuns at the mission school “terrified the children with thestory of the snake in the Garden of Eden to end devotion to Quetzalcoatl.”46
Silko, however, deconstructs this association by viewing the snake in thecontext of indigenous cultures and precolonial histories of the Americas andAfrica. In Laguna, giant snakes, “Ma ah shra true ee,” have been revered as
sacred messengers; Quetzalcoatl is one of the most important gods in
Mexico; in Africa and Caribbean voodoo culture, Damballah is a primordial
deity who created all life. In a way, Silko’s stone snake is a pan-tribal andcross-cultural symbol reinforcing powerful indigenous belief systems
against colonial forces.
In terms of nuclear colonialism, the American Southwest and colonial
Africa have more in common than it appears. As J. D. L. Moore notes inSouth Africa and Nuclear Proliferation, during the 1940s, most of theuranium procured from Canada and the Belgian Congo (and later fromSouth Africa, Australia, and Portugal) went to the United States.47 In fact,colonial Africa was America’s first supplier of uranium. Makoto Oda further
points out that the ore making the first atom bombs possible in 1945 waspurchased from a Belgian mining company and extracted from a mine in the
Belgian Congo; about 1,250 tons of uranium ore were shipped to New Yorkat the beginning of World War II and later purchased by the US government.48
The production of the atom bombs depended on the exploitation of African
land and labor, just as it depended on the exploitation of Native America.
Silko does not explicitly connect Africa with nuclear colonization, yet
her dissent from the apocalyptic view of colonial influence on indigenous
people around the globe should not be overlooked. For example, in Almanacof the Dead, at the International Holistic Healer’s Convention, BarefootHopi, a revolutionary hero, recognizes the colonial connections between
people of Africa and the tribal people of the Americas and asserts that black
Africans and other “foreign allies” will help Native America rise up; heclaims that indigenous forces in the Americas will follow in the footsteps ofSouth Africa, whose lands had been returned to Ogoun or Damballah withthe sacrifice of both white and black people of Africa.49 Meanwhile, Clinton,
another participant at the convention, focuses on the deprived history of
black Indians, the descendants of American Indians and escaped Africanslaves, in America. Clinton believes that the spirits of African ancestors live
on in America. The spirits accompanied the slaves who had been taken
away from their homeland: “Millions of black Indians were scatteredthroughout the Americas. Africans in the Americas had always been ‘home’Leslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent in the American Southwest

81

because ‘home’ is where the ancestor spirits are. From the gentle giants,
Damballah and Quetzalcoatl, to the Maize mother, and the Twin Brothers
and Old Woman Spider, Africa and the Americas had been possessed.”50
Through these characters, Silko suggests that, like the tribal people of South
Africa who fought against colonial forces, Native Americans will rise up
again to regain their land, but this time with aid and support from various
people of color, cultures, and nationalitlies.
In Almanac of the Dead, the cross-cultural and pan-tribal coalitions thatconsist of indigenous Americans, black Africans, African Americans,
Mexicans, Mexican Americans, and black Indians are presented ascounterforces against capitalism, colonialism, and political borders. As
many critics point out, such pan-tribal and cross-cultural coalitions could bea salvation for Native America. Joni Adamson, for example, looks for “amodel for community activism” in such coalitions, insisting that finding a“common ground” with people from different groups, backgrounds, andprofessions is a key for community activism.51 Channette Romero goes
further and points out that Almanac of the Dead presents a model of “tribalinternationalists” that “overcome[s] the limitations of the American Indian
Movement.”52 Although the consequences of colonialism are overwhelming,
Silko combats the ever-evolving destructive power of European hegemony
with indigenous power that crosses cultural, racial, and national boundaries.

V. Sterling’s Epiphany
Silko’s rhetorical subversiveness is best explained by Craig S. Womack
in Red on Red: Native American Literary Separatism. Womack contrasts
the work of Silko’s imagination to the idea of entropy invoked by Thomas
Pynchon in Gravity’s Rainbow. Womack believes “Silko’s metaphor is not
entropy but a redistribution of energy” in which the “European order dies
off because of its moral and spiritual bankruptcy and capitalism’s inability
to sustain itself.”53 Although its fall seems apocalyptic, Womack suggests, it
is not “the end of the world”: “As things European fall back to earth,indigenous consciousness takes over. Ancestor spirits spiral and swirl
around the world’s indigenous populations, urging them to rise up, and thecontinent begins a return to more communal ways of being.”54 Womackargues here that viewing the novel as “apocalyptic” reveals the novel’s
themes only partially because the circular motion of energy, based on thelarger ecological system and indigenous consciousness, is at the center ofSilko’s work. This is represented by what Old Yoeme tells Lecha in Almanac

82

Kyoko Matsunagaof the Dead:
The energy or “electricity” of a being’s spirit was not extinguished bydeath; it was set free from the flesh. Dust to dust or as a meal for packrats, the energy of the spirit was never lost. Out of the dust grew theplants; the plants were consumed and became muscle and bone; and all
the time, the energy had only been changing form, nothing had been
lost or destroyed.55
Old Yoeme believes that the energy of spirit would go on while changing its
form as represented in the native almanac, native prophecies, and pan-tribal
mobilization. Sterling’s epiphany at the end of the novel reinforces thisbelief as well.
Sterling’s revelation seems pessimistic at first because he realizes that his
life, too, is on the verge of destruction: ironically, however, what Sterling
had thought was vanishing—old people’s stories and their beliefs—isreturning as the indigenous prophecies foretold. Considering the resurgenceof pan-tribal power, tragedy resides only in those who do not believe in thecircular motion of native history. Sterling recovers from this tragic thinking
and ultimately arrives at a dramatic conclusion:
Sterling sat for a long time near the stone snake. The breeze off thejunipers cooled his face and neck. He closed his eyes. The snake didn’t
care if people were believers or not; the work of the spirits andprophecies went on regardless. Spirit beings might appear anywhere,
even near open-pit mines. The snake didn’t care about the uranium
tailings; humans had desecrated only themselves with the mine, not theearth. Burned and radioactive, with all humans’ death, the earth would
still be sacred. Man was too insignificant to desecrate her.56
Here, by equalizing all places (“spirit beings might appear anywhere”),
including the mine and test sites, Sterling appreciates the Pueblo repudiationof hierarchies: “No thing or location on the earth is of greater or lesser value
than another.”57 Through such understanding, Sterling starts to see beyond
the linear and apocalyptic vision of colonial forces.
Silko is not indifferent to the destructive forces of colonialism in Alamancof the Dead. She opposes those forces by emphasizing the belief thatindigenous spirits and land have the power to transform the apocalyptic
imagination. In the above passage, the parallel between “the work of theLeslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent in the American Southwest

83

spirits and prophecies” and the sacred earth is informative. Silko repeatedly
reminds readers that, with or without violence, a global indigenous
movement is happening and will continue: just as humans cannot control
planetary dynamics, nobody has the power to halt the indigenous movementthat has already begun. It might not climax within a few years, but it willmaterialize, just as natural forces such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions,and droughts occur despite humans’ will.

Conclusion
During the Cold War period, when other literary works portrayed nuclear
fear, nuclear anxiety, and nuclear apocalypse, Silko challenged colonial
nuclear discourse in the American Southwest. In Ceremony, Tayo’s descentinto a uranium mine reveals the pattern of transpacific destructive forces at
the hands of nuclear industrialism and militalism. Detrimental influences ofcontemporary colonial forces are evident in this novel, but Silko attempts tosubvert them by incorporating them into a pan-tribal witchery narrative, in
effect redefining the colonial narrative as just one part of the Laguna tribal
narrative. In Almanac of the Dead Silko features the darker side of modern
life. Although she reflects a more apocalyptic tone shaped by the legacy of
the Cold War in her second novel, she continues to contest the destructive
power of colonial hegemony, promoting instead a transnational indigenous
movement.
In his well-known article “No Apocalypse, Not Now (full speed ahead,seven missiles, seven missives)” (1984) Jacques Derrida wrote, “Literature
has always belonged to the nuclear epoch.”58 Following Derrida’s nuclear
criticism, which draws attention to the role of literature in the Nuclear Age,a more recent 2008 study by Daniel Cordle demonstrates how nuclear
technology pervades our daily lives, particularly “mainstream” literature,
and argues that since the Cold War is defined by “suspense” (“anticipationof disaster rather than disaster itself”), Silko’s Ceremony, too, is “caught ina moment of cultural suspense.”59 Cordle’s statement is correct in that
Silko’s work strongly reflects the ubiquity of the Cold War, especially its
apocalyptic tone and nuclear anxiety and its influence on the American
imagination. However, Silko’s attempt to overcome such powerful rhetoric,
despite the odds against it, should not be dismissed. Silko’s fiction suggeststhat she may see things a little differently from Derrida. In Silko’s novels
and in the Laguna worldview she depicts, the Nuclear Age belongs tostories, rather than the other way around. Through story, Silko challenges

84

Kyoko Matsunaga

popular representations of nuclearism during the Cold War and offers
alternatives to the hegemonic system supporting nuclear colonization.

Notes
This article is the result of research supported by the Japan Society for the Promotionof Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Kakenhi) number 25770111.
Valerie L. Kuletz, The Tainted Desert: Environmental and Social Ruin in theAmerican West (New York: Routledge, 1998), 6. Kuletz defines nuclear colonialism asfollows: “My use of the term ‘nuclear colonialism’ attempts to situate the emergent
nuclear landscape in the arid regions of the American Southwest within a larger history
of US internal colonialism, that is, within the expropriation of native lands and thedisplacement of North America’s indigenous population by their European conquerors”(6).
2 Ibid., 20.
3 US Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office, “United States Nuclear Test:
July 1945 through September 1992,” December 2000, accessed December 9, 2013,
http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/publications/historical/DOENV_209_REV15.pdf.
4 On August 13, 2013, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that
the Obama administration’s intention to close the proposed waste site contradicts afederal law. “Obama Administration Violating Law On Nuclear Waste Dump Decision
Delay: Appeals Court,” Huffington Post, August 13, 2013, accessed September 5, 2013,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/13/obama-nuclear-waste-dump_n_3749254.
html.
5 Kuletz, Tainted Desert, 12. On the studies of nuclearism and its impact on Native
America, see Donald A. Grinde and Bruce E. Johansen, Ecocide of Native America:
Environmental Destruction on Indian Lands and Peoples (Santa Fe: Clear Light, 1995),
chaps. 5 and 8; Ward Churchill and Winona LaDuke, “Native North America: The
Political Economy of Radioactive Colonialism,” in The State of Native America:
Genocide, Colonization, and Resistance, ed. M. Annette Jaimes (Boston: South End
Press, 1992), 241–66; Noriko Ishiyama, Hokubei senjuu minzoku to kaku haikibutu:
Kankyou seigi wo meguru tousou [Native Americans and nuclear waste: Disputes overenvironmental justice] (Tokyo: Akashi Shoten, 2004); Jun Kamata, Henkyou no teikou:
Kaku haikibutu to amerika senjuumin no shakai undou [Resistance at the margin:
Radioactive waste and American Indian social movement] (Tokyo: Ochanomizu shobou,
2006).
6 Kuletz, Tainted Desert, 13. About the strategic construction of the myth of theAmerican West as “the barren land,” see also Ishiyama, “Nebada jikkenjou to yakka
1Leslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent in the American Southwest

85

maunten: Kaku no kuukan kouchiku to jinshu shugi” [Nevada Test Site and Yucca
Mountain: The construction of nuclear space and racism], American Review 42 (2008):
57–76.
7 For more detail on Simon J. Ortiz’s Fight Back and its nuclear connection, see
Kyoko Matsunaga, “Resisting and Surviving Apocalypse: Simon J. Ortiz’s (Post)
Colonial Nuclear Narrative,” Southwestern American Literature 33, no. 1 (Fall 2008):
15–27.
8 Silko, Ceremony (New York: Penguin Books, 1977), 243.
9 Ibid., 244.
10 The information about the history of the Laguna Pueblo uranium mining comesfrom the following sources: Kuletz, Tainted Desert, 24; Churchill and LaDuke, “Political
Economy of Radioactive Colonialism,” 256–61; Philip Sittnick, “Uranium Mining and
Its Impact on Laguna Pueblo: A Study Guide for an Interdisciplinary Unit,” July 1998,
accessed September 5, 2013, www.miningwatch.ca/updir/umine.pdf, 13–18.
11 Churchill and LaDuke, “Political Economy of Radioactive Colonialism,” 259.
12 Ibid.; Sittnick, “Uranium Mining,” 17–18.
13 Paul Fussell describes barbed wire as a powerful symbol of war and its ironicevolution from elatively benign use in agricultural and pastoral landscapes to deadly use
around the trenches during the World War I. Paul Fussell, The Great War and Modern
Memory (London: Oxford University Press, 1975), 42, 96.
14 Terry Tempest Williams, Refuge: An Unnatural History of Family and Place (NewYork: Vintage, 1991), 288.
15 Of course, the irony here is that the nulcear presence “trespassed” on land that had
belonged to indigenous people.
16 Silko, Ceremony, 245.
17 Ibid., 246.
18 Ibid.
19 Williams, Refuge, 282–83.
20 Ibid., 283–84.
21 Silko, Ceremony, 246.
22 Williams, Refuge, 290.
23 Franz Boas, Keresan Texts, vol. 8, part 1 (New York: American Ethnological Society,
1928), 56–76.
24 Shamoon Zamir, “Literature in a National Sacrifice Area: Leslie Marmon Silko’s
Ceremony,” in New Voices in Native American Literary Criticism, ed. Arnold Krupat(Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1993), 401–02.
25 Edith Swan,”Healing via the Sunwise Cycle in Silko’s Ceremony,” American Indian
Quarterly, no. 12 (1988): 314.
26 Thus far, many scholars have recognized the connection between the atom bomb

86

Kyoko Matsunaga

and the witchery narrative in Ceremony. For example, Lawrence Buell suggests thatsince the manifestations of the “destroyers” are European conquest and technologicaltransformation, witchery exists in the production and detonation of the atom bombs;
Robert Nelson emphasizes the renovated ceremony in which the spirit of the destroyers
is invested in the atom bomb; Shamoon Zamir notes the embodiment of culturaltransformation and innovation of Native Americans in the face of Western colonization,
represented by a “capitalist political economy since the forties in the shape of uranium
mining, atomic power development, and an atomic-weapons testing program of grotesque
proportions.” Lawrence Buell, The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature
Writing, and the Formation of American Culture (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard
University Press, 1995), 287; Zamir, “Literature in a National Sacrifice Area,” 398;
Nelson, Place and Vision, 148–49.
27 Ibid., 60–62.
28 Silko, Ceremony, 134.
29 Ibid., 132
30 Silko, Yellow Woman and a Beauty of the Spirit (New York: Simon and Schuster,1996), 44.
31 Ibid., 91.
32 Silko, Almanac of the Dead (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991), 760–61.
33 Ibid., 759.
34 Ibid.
35 Ibid., 34.
36 Ibid.
37 About the socioeconomic and cultural effects of the mine on the Laguna people andthe reclamation of the mine, see Sittnick, “Uranium Mining,” 17–20.
38 Silko, Almanac of the Dead, 35.
39 Ibid.
40 Ibid., 759.
41 Ibid., 760.
42 Ibid., 759.
43 Ibid., 132–33.
44 Silko, Yellow Woman, 133.
45 Ibid., 147.
46 Silko, Almanac of the Dead, 519.
47 D. L. Moore, South Africa and Nuclear Proliferation: South Africa’s Nuclear
Capabilities and Intentions in the Context of International Non-Proliferation Policies(London: Macmillan, 1987), 12.
48 Makoto Oda, Afterword in Hiroshima (1984 repr., Tokyo: Kodansha, 1997), 420.
49 Silko, Almanac of the Dead, 731–32.

Leslie Marmon Silko and Nuclear Dissent in the American Southwest

87

Ibid., 742.
Joni Adamson, American Indian Literature, Environmental Justice, and Ecocriticism:
The Middle Place (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2001), 17–76.
52 Channette Romero, “Envisioning a ‘Network of Tribal Coalitions’: Leslie Marmon
Silko’s Almanac of the Dead,” American Indian Quarterly 26, no. 4 (2002): 623.
53 Craig S. Womack, Red on Red: Native American Literary Separatism (Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press, 1999), 253.
54 Ibid.
55 Silko, Almanac of the Dead, 719.
56 Ibid., 762.
57 Silko, Yellow Woman, 133.
58 Jacques Derrida, “No Apocalypse, Not Now (full speed ahead, seven missiles, seven
missives),” Diacritics 14, no. 2 (Summer 1984): 27.
59 Daniel Cordle, States of Suspense: The Nuclear Age, Postmodernism and UnitedStates Fiction and Prose. (New York: Manchester University Press, 2008), 2, 120.
50
51