Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 7, 2007, pp. 826-840

SELF-CRITICISM, GOAL MOTIVATION,
AND GOAL PROGRESS
THEODORE A. POWERS
University of Massactiusetts Dartmouth
RICHARD KOESTNER AND DAVID C. ZUROFF
McGill University

The current research examined the relations among self-criticism, autonomous
versus controlled motivations, and goal progress. Recent researchers have suggested that self-critics are less autonomously motivated, that is, that their goals areless tied to their interests and personal meaning than is true for other individuals,
and that the effects of self-criticism on goal progress are mediated by lower levelsof autonomous motivation. The results of two short-term, prospective studies conducted in the United States and Canada indicated that self-criticism was negatively
associated with goal progress, while autonomous motivation was positively associated with goal progress in one study and marginally associated in the other. The results demonstrated an association between self-criticism and controlled
motivation but not autonomous motivation, and they suggest that self-criticism
and autonomy act independently on goal progress. In addition, the results indicated an association between self-criticism and rumination and procrastinationthat appears to mediate the impact of self-criticism on goal progress. These results
highlight the need for consideration of both personality and motivational
influences in the study of goal pursuits.

To understand the pursuit of personal goals one must consider the importance of both personality and motivational factors, the who and thewhy. Personahty theories and recent empirical findings support theidea that characteristics such as self-criticism may have an impact on
how and why people pursue their goals and on their success at accomPlease send correspondence to Theodore A. Powers, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Rd.,
North Dartmouth, MA 02747-2300. E-mail: tpowers@umassd.edu.
Study 1 was funded by grants from the Social Science and Humanities Research Councilof Canada (SSHRC) and the Fonds Qudbecois de Recherche Sur la Societe et la Culture,
Quebec (FQRSC) to Richard Koestner and David Zuroff.
826

SELE- CRITICISM A N D GOAL PROGRESS

827

plishing them (Blatt, 1995; 2004). Self-Determination Theory highlights the central importance of autonomous self-regulation for both
successful goal attainment and for quality of life more generally (Deci& Ryan, 2000). Recent efforts have begun to explore the association between self-criticism and autonomous and controlled motivations(Shahar, Henrich, Blatt, Ryan, & Little, 2003). The present research extends this effort and examines the relation of these variables to goal
progress.
Self-Determination Theory maintains that motivations vary in the degree to which they are autonomous or controlled (Deci & Ryan 2000). An
individual is considered autonomously motivated if he or she experiences goals and decisions to be self-generated or freely chosen. On theother hand, someone is considered to be motivated in a controlled fashion if he or she is controlled by external or internal pressures. Sheldon
and his colleagues have extensively explored the role of autonomous
versus controlled motivations in understanding the pursuit of personalgoals (Sheldon & Elliot, 1998; Sheldon & Elliot, 1999; Sheldon & Kasser,
1998; Sheldon & Hauser-Marko, 2001). They have conducted several
studies in which participants indicated their personal goals and theirmotivations for these goals. Participants were later asked to report on
their goal progress, that is, their subjective judgments of the degree towhich they had accomplished their goals. The results of these studies
consistently indicated that autonomous motivation was associated withgreater goal progress.
Recent research has begun to examine how autonomous and controlled motivations might relate to particular personality characteristics(Shahar et al., 2003). These authors contend that self-criticism, amaladaptive form of self-definition characterized by self-regulationthat is guided by guilt and fear of reproach, predisposes individuals toward less autonomous motivation and poor adaptation. The self-regulatory functioning of the self-critic closely resembles Ryan's (1995) description of "introjected self-regulation"—a form of controlled
motivation based on contingent self-esteem and avoiding guilt. In theirstudy of 860 adolescents, Shahar et al. (2003) found that self-criticism
was associated with fewer positive life events, that self-criticism was
negatively associated with autonomous motivation, and that the effectof self-criticism on positive life events was mediated by lower levels of
autonomous motivation.
In a study more directly related to goal pursuits, Shahar, Kalnitzki,
Shulman, & Blatt (2006) examined self-<riticism, autonomous and controlled motivations and three "goal appraisal dimensions." Participants
were asked to list their current personal strivings in various domains
and results were aggregated across domains. Self-criticism was associ-

828

POWERS ET AL.

ated with lower levels of self-reported "present goal progress" and "future goal expectations." Self-criticism was also associated with higher
levels of "goal related external motivation" (i.e., controlled motivation),
but was not associated with "goal related internal motivation" (i.e., autonomous motivation). The authors expected the effects of self-criticism
on the goal appraisal dimensions to be mediated by controlled motivation, but they found that while self-criticism was associated with controlled motivation, this motivation was not significantly predictive of
the goal dimensions. Therefore, while Shahar et al. (2003) suggested that
there is a mediational link between self-criticism, autonomous and controlled motivations and goal progress, Shahar et al. (2006) failed toconfirm this link when specifically considering goal functioning.
The work of Shahar et al. (2003,2006) is an important step in bringing
together the theoretical models of self-criticism and autonomy, and thepresent research attempts to extend this integration and to consider therole of these variables in the pursuit of personal goals. Shahar et al.
(2006) demonstrated a negative association between self-criticism andgoal pursuits, and there are clear theoretical reasons why self-criticism
may interfere with these pursuits. It is possible that self-critics have developed motivations that are less internally generated or integrated into
the self, and will therefore be likely to set less autonomous goals. As a result, the self-critic may be more likely to initiate and regulate goal pursuits based on guilt and self-esteem contingencies rather than based oninterest and personal meaning. Self-critics are likely to be more focusedon avoiding failure and preventing the loss of approval than on effective
goal pursuit. However, based on the differing findings of the two Shahar
et al. studies, the question remains as to whether self-criticism and autonomous goal motivation operate in a mediational manner or as
independent predictors of goal progress.
PRESENT STUDIESThe first study used a short-term, prospective design and examined theassociation of self-criticism and autonomous and controlled motivations to progress on academic and social goals. The second study also
used a short-term, prospective design and focused on the association ofself-criticism and autonomous and controlled motivations to progresson the weight loss goals of college women.
Three hypotheses were offered. First, we expected that self-criticism
would be negatively associated with goal progress. Second, we expectedthat autonomous goal motivation would be positively associated withgoal progress. Third, consistent with both Shahar et al. (2003) andSELF- CRITICISM A N D COAL PROGRESS

829

Shahar et al. (2006), we expected self-criticism to be positively associated with controlled motivation.
Given the inconsistencies between the Shahar et al. (2003) and the
Shahar et al. (2006), we hoped to determine whether the effect ofself-criticism on goal progress was mediated by goal motivation. Such
mediation could occur via two pathways. The first would lead fromself-criticism to lower autonomous motivation to lower goal progress.
The second pathway would lead from self-criticism to higher controlled
motivation to lower goal progress. The Shahar et al. (2006) study examining goal processes failed to confirm either pathway. Self-criticism was
not directly associated with lower autonomous goal motivation, andcontrolled motivation (which was associated with self-criticism) was
unrelated to goal progress.
STUDY 1

Study 1 was adapted from prospective studies of motivation and goal
progress conducted by Sheldon and colleagues (Sheldon & Kasser, 1998;
Sheldon & Elliot, 1998). Male and female college students completed aself-criticism scale prior to identifying a relevant academic and social
goal that they were trying to achieve during the semester. Participants
reported on their goal progress at a one-month follow-up.'
METHOD
ParticipantsParticipants were recruited for a "study of goal pursuits." Only respondents who indicated that they had a relevant personal goal in boththe academic and social domains were included in the study. The sample included 65 women and 22 men. Everyone was paid $20 for their
participation. Four participants did not complete the goal progressmeasure.
Procedure
Participants were tested in small groups during the second week of thesemester and were foUowed-up by email one month later. Participants
1. Study 1 also included the manipulation of implementation plans. Implementation
planning involved completion of a brief paper-and-pencil exercise in which participants
specified how, when, and where they would pursue actions related to their stated personalgoals. The results for implementation planning are reported in another article (Koestner etal., 2006), indicating that significantly greater goal progress occurred only when implementation plans were combined with autonomy support in comparison to a neutral control condition.

830

POWERS ET AL.

in all conditions were first asked to report on their demographic characteristics and to complete the self-criticism scale. Participants were thenrandomly assigned to either a control group or to one of two experimental conditions. Participants were then asked to describe an academic anda social goal that they wanted to pursue during the semester.
Implementation Intention Exercises. Participants in the two experimental conditions completed a paper-and-pencil implementation plarming
exercise that is described in Koestner et al. (2006).
Measures
Goal Motivation. Sheldon and Kasser's (1998) four items for measuring the relative autonomy of goals were used. For each goal, participants
rated on a 9-point Likert scale, from 1 ("not at all for this reason") to 9("completely because of this reason"). The four types of reasons were,respectively, external ("because somebody else wants you to, or because
you'll get something from somebody if you do"), introjected ("because
you would feel ashamed, guilty or anxious if you didn't—you feel thatyou ought to strive for this"), identified ("because you really believe that
it is an important goal to have—you endorse it freely and value it wholeheartedly") and intrinsic ("because of the fun and enjoyment which thegoal will provide you—the primary reason is simply your interest in theexperience itself"). Following previous research by Sheldon and colleagues, a scale assessing autonomous motivation was computed as themean of intrinsic and identified regulations, whereas a scale assessing
controlled motivation was computed as the mean of introjected andexternal regulation.
Self-Criticism Scale. This scale was created by using fourteen items
from the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ; Blatt, D'Afflitti,& Quinlan, 1976). An illustrative item included, "I tend to be very criticalof myself." These items were those that loaded highest on the self-criticism factor for the DEQ. Participants were asked to rate their agreementwith each item on a 7-point Likert scale with 1 representing "Strongly
Disagree" and 7 representing "Strongly Agree." The Cronbach's alphawas .86.
Goal Progress. Goal progress for each of the academic and social goals
was assessed with a single item: "Please rate the extent to which you
made progress on this goal." Ratings were made on a nine-point Likert
scale, from 1 ("not at all") to 9 ("totally"). This measure of goal progresshas been used in several previous studies (Koestner et al., 2002; Sheldon& Kasser, 1998; Sheldon & Elliot, 1998). Recent studies have repeatedly
shown a high degree of agreement between self-report and more direct
measures, suggesting the validity of these assessments (Sheeran, Milne,
Webb, & GoUwitzer, 2005).

SELF- CRITICISM A N D COAL PROGRESS

831

RESULTS

Preliminary Analyses
Progress for participants' academic and social goals were significantly
related, r (82) = .43, p < .01. The autonomy of academic and social goals
were also significantly related, r (82) = .28, p < .01, as was the level of controlled motivation of the academic and social goals, r (82) = .27, p = .01.
We therefore calculated mean progress, autonomy and control scores
across the two goals. Gender had no main or interactive effects on goal
progress; therefore, male and female participants were combined for
subsequent analyses.^Central Analyses
Table 1 presents the means, standard deviations, and correlations for themain variables. Self-criticism for the sample was relatively low (midpoint of the scale was 4.0), participants reported higher levels of autonomous reasons for their academic and social goals than controlled
reasons, and goal progress was considered to be moderate. Self-criticism was negatively associated with goal progress. Autonomous motivation was only marginally positively associated with goal progress.
Self-criticism was positively related to controlled motivation. Because
self-criticism was unrelated to autonomous motivation and controlled
motivation was unrelated to goal progress, it is not possible to construct
a mediational pathway that leads directly from self-criticism tomotivation to goal progress (Baron & Kenny, 1986).
To test the combined effects of self-criticism and goal motivation on
goal progress a multiple regression analysis was conducted. Specifically, goal progress was regressed on self-criticism, autonomous motivation and controlled motivation. The regression model was significant,R = .34, R^ = .12, F (3, 79) = 3.28, p < .05. Self-criticism significantly predicted lower goal progress, beta = -.23, p < .05. Autonomous motivation
was only marginally predictive of higher goal progress, beta = .18, p = .10.
Controlled motivation was unrelated to goal progress, beta = -.07.
STUDY 2

Study 1 focused on academic and social goals and examined the links
among self-criticism, autonomous and controlled motivations, and goal
2. There was no main effect for implementation plans on goal progress in Study 1. There
was also no interaction of implementation condition with self-criticism, autonomous motivation, or controlled motivation.

832

POWERS ET AL.
TABLE 1. Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations for Measures: Study 1

Variabie
1. Self Criticism

1
—

2
—
—

2. Autonomous motivation-.11

3. Controlled motivation

.45**

-.08

3
—
—
—

4. Coal Progress-.29**

.21

-.18

M
3.23

SD
1.12

6.70

1.15

3.59

1.33

4.86

1.50

*p < .05; **p < .01; df= 82 for all correlations.

progress. The restolts were similar to those obtained by Shahar et al. (2006)
in showing that self-criticism was associated with controlled motivationand lower goal progress; however, autonomous motivation was only marginally associated with greater goal progress. Study 1 extended Shahar etal. (2006) by using a prospective design and focusing on specific goals in
two important domains. Study 2 extends these findings by exploring healthrelated goals, in particular weight loss goals. Weight loss is the most common New Year's resolution among women (Norcross, Ratzin, & Payne,1989) and many college age women are trying to lose weight either by dieting or exercise (Koestner et al., 2002). The role of autonomous motivation in
relation to health goals such as losing weight has been extensively examined by Williams and his colleagues (Williams, Grow, Freedman, Ryan, &Deci, 1996; Williams et al., 2002). In one study autonomous motivation predicted greater weight loss in a sample of obese patients, and also predicted
better maintenance of that weight loss (Williams et al., 1996). Similar results
have been found in studies of smoking cessation and other medical
treatment (Williams, Gagne, Ryan, & Deci, 2002).
Study 2 also examines another potential aspect of the self-regulatory
dysfunction of the self-<ritic. Blatt (1995, 2004) suggests that self-critics
are likely to be preoccupied with failure, potential judgment and potential
loss of self-esteem. Obsessive rumination about such concems and the attendant procrastination that is likely to result should distract from effective goal pursuit, and thereby diminish successful accomplishment. Studies have demonstrated how these obstructive practices deleteriously
affect the goal pursuit of maladaptive perfectionists who closely resemble
self-critics (Rheaume et al., 2000). Therefore, it is anticipated that the effect of self-criticism on goal progress may be at least partially mediated by
the rumination and procrastination of the self-critic.
Based on the results of Study 1 and earlier findings by Shahar et al.
(2003,2006), we expected that self-criticism would be negatively associated with reported weight loss goal progress. Second, we expected that
autonomous goal motivation would be positively associatedi with goal
progress. Third, we expected self-criticism to be positively associatedSELE- CRITICISM A N D COAL PROGRESS

833

with controlled motivation, but that controlled motivation would notpredict goal progress. Finally, we anticipated that self-criticism would
be positively correlated with rumination and procrastination, and thatthe effect of self-criticism on goal progress would be partially mediatedby this association.
METHOD
ParticipantsParticipants for this study were 117 female undergraduate students
from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. The age range for theparticipants was from 18 to 35, with a mean age of 19.12 (SD = 2.16). Participants were recruited through the participant pool of introductory
psychology students. The study was advertised as being appropriate forpeople who were considering losing weight. The subjects were informedthat the purpose was to set a short-term goal that would allow them to"jump-start" a weight loss program. The goal would be something theywould try to accomplish during a one-week period. Participants wererequired to sign up for an initial session that would run for approximately 45 minutes and a second 15-minute follow-up session thatwould take place online through a website one week later.
Procedure
Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Implementation Intentions or Control. Participants were asked to supply theiremail address so the researcher would be able to send the website address along with a reminder of their chosen goal directly to them after aone-week period.
During the first session, subjects were asked to formulate one goal related to weight loss that would be carried out for a one-week period.
Once the goal was recorded, subjects were administered the Implementation Instructions (for those in the experimental group), and then thegoal motivation and self-criticism scales. The implementation intention
manipulation was adapted from Koestner et al. (2002).
At the end of a one-week period, subjects received an email with a reminder of their chosen goal and were directed to a website in which they
were asked to indicate the amount of progress they had made on theirgoals and the degree of rumination and procrastination they had experienced. The reported goals included ones like the following: "I will get to
the gym three times" or "I will avoid junk food."
Measures
Goal Motivation. This scale was adapted from the one used by Williams et al. (1996) and consisted of items measuring autonomous and834

POWERS ET AL.

controlled reasons for losing weight. Participants were asked to rate theextent to which they set the weight related goal for a variety of different
reasons. This measure was used to be consistent with the health related
goal research previously conducted. The scale included three items
measuring autonomous motivation (e.g., "I'll feel a lot of personal satisfaction if I do this") and four items measuring controlled motivation(e.g., "I'll feel like a failure if I don't"). Participants responded using a
7-point Likert-type scale with 1 representing "Not at AU" and 7 representing "Very Much." The Cronbach's alphas were .75 and .81 for the autonomous and controlled motivation scales, respectively.
Self-Criticism Scale. This scale was identical to the one used in Study
1. The Cronbach's alpha was .80.
Goal Progress. Participants were asked the identical goal progressquestion as in Study 1. The rating was made on a 9-point scale. Two additional items asked participants to rate their own satisfaction with theirgoal progress, and the extent to which a significant other would be satisfied with that goal progress. These latter items were added in order tocreate a more reliable multi-item measure of goal progress. The
Cronbach's alpha was .93.
Rumination and Procrastination. A four-item scale was created that
asked participants to report the levels of rumination and procrastinationthat they experienced over the week in their attempts to accomplish theirgoals. The items included the following: "I kept turning over and over inmy mind what I needed to do, but stayed stuck not doing it," "I let otherthings get in the way of taking steps to accomplish this goal," "I kept
thinking a lot about the goal that I was trying to achieve, but had a difficult time putting the thoughts into action," and "I put off taking the necessary steps to accomplish this goal." Participants were asked to rate
their agreement with each item on a seven-point Likert scale with 1 representing "Strongly Disagree" and 7 representing "Strongly Agree."
The Cronbach's alpha was .91.
RESULTS
Central Analyses
Table 2 presents the means, standard deviations, and correlations for themain variables.^ Self-criticism was negatively associated with goal
progress. Autonomous motivation was positively associated with goal

3. There was no main effect for implementation plans on goal progress in Study 2. There
was also no interaction of implementation plans with self-criticism, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, or procrastination and rumination.

SELF- CRITICISM A N D COAL PROGRESS

835

TABtE 2. Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations for Measures: Study 2
Variable
1. Self Criticism
2. Autonomous motivation
3. Controlled motivation
4. Procrastination
5. Coal Progress' p < .05; **p <.Q^I;df=^^6

1
.15
.54**
.30**
-.21*

2

3

.26*
-.21*

.14

.23*

.04

4

M
4.21
6.15
3.17
4.52

-.55**

5.48

for all correlations.

progress. Self-criticism was positively associated with controlled motivation. Rumination and procrastination was positively associated with
self-criticism, and negatively associated with autonomous goal motivation and with goal progress. All of the above results were maintained
when the single-item measure of goal progress from Study 1 was usedby itself.
To test the combined effects of self-criticism and goal motivation on
goal progress, a multiple regression analysis was conducted. Specifically, goal progress was regressed on self-criticism, autonomous motivation and controlled motivation. The regression model was significant,R = .36, R^ = .13, F (3,113) = 5.43, p < .01. Self-criticism significantly predicted lower goal progress, beta = -.32, p < .01. Autonomous motivation
significantly predicted higher goal progress, beta = .24, p < .05. Controlled motivation was unrelated to goal progress, beta - .15.
Because self-criticism was unrelated to autonomous motivation andcontrolled motivation was unrelated to goal progress, it is not possible toconstruct a mediational pathway that leads directly from self-criticism
to motivation to goal progress (Baron & Kenny, 1986). To examine
whether rumination and procrastination mediated the negative association of self-criticism to goal progress we considered the four criteria outlined by Baron and Kenny (1986). The first three criteria for mediation
were established by the correlations described above: self-criticism, rumination and procrastination, and goal progress were all significantly
associated with one another. The final criterion requires that the association between the initial variable and the outcome is reduced to non-significance after controlling for the mediator. A partial correlation analysis revealed that the association between self-criticism and goal
progress was reduced from r (116) - -.21, p = .05 to pr (115) = -.10, ns, after controlling for rumination and procrastination. The Sobel test, whichmeasures whether a mediator carries the influence of an independent

836

POWERS ET AL.

variable to a dependent variable, was highly significant, f (116) = 2.99, p <.001.
There was also evidence that the association of autonomous motivation to goal progress was mediated by rumination and procrastination,
though to a lesser extent. Specifically, the association of autonomous
motivation to goal progress (r (116) = .23), was reduced when rumination and procrastination was controlled ( pr (115) = .14). The Sobel test
was significant, t (116) = 2.17 p < .05.
GENERAL DISCUSSION

The current research explored the associations among self-criticism, autonomous and controlled motivations, and examined the impact of eachon reported goal progress. Consistent with expectations, the results ofthe current studies demonstrated that self-criticism was negatively associated with goal progress. Autonomous motivation was positively associated with goal progress in Study 2 and marginally associated inStudy 1. In both studies, self-criticism was positively associated with
controlled motivation, but controlled motivation did not predict goal
progress. Self-criticism was unrelated to autonomous motivation."
The negative association between self-criticism and goal progress is
consistent with Shahar et al. (2006) and the previous literature suggesting the harmful effects of self-criticism more generally (Blatt, 1995,
2004). The present research represented an advance over the Shahar etal. (2006) study because it used a prospective research design and assessed specific goals in three distinct domains—academic, social, andhealth related. Consistent with the central prediction derived from
Self-determination Theory, autonomous motivation was positively associated with goal progress in Study 2 and marginally associated inStudy 1. Interestingly, if the results of our two studies are combined
meta-analytically with those of Shahar et al. (2006), a coherent picture of
the relation of self-criticism, goal motivation, and goal progress
emerges. That is, across the three studies, self-criticism is negatively associated with goal progress, mean r - -.28, p < .001; self-criticism is positively associated with controlled motivation, mean r = .45, p < .001; and4. The current studies found inconsistent associations between controlled and autonomous motivations. A close examination of previous goal studies suggests that such inconsistency is not uncommon. The original Sheldon and Elliot (1998) studies distinguishingautonomous and controlled goal motivation reported very modest negative associations,while two recent studies of work goals found that autonomous and controlled motivation
tended to be positively correlated with one another 0udge et al., 2005).

SELF- CRITICISM A N D COAL PROGRESS

837

self-criticism is unrelated to autonomous motivation, mean r = .01, ns.
The supposition that the harmful impact of self-criticism on goal progress is due to the self-critic's impaired autonomous motivation, therefore, is not supported by the current results. Rather than autonomy mediating the effects of self-criticism, the results suggest that bothself-criticism and autonomous motivation contribute independently tothe prediction of goal progress.
The results failed to demonstrate a significant negative association between controlled motivation and goal progress, an association thatwould be derived from Self-Determination Theory. A careful examination of previous research using the personal goal paradigm reveals thatwhile the positive association of autonomous motivation with goal
progress is reliably obtained, it is, in fact, very common for controlled
motivation to be unrelated to progress. For example, in the original article distinguishing autonomous and controlled forms of goal motivation
the authors reported that in all three of their studies controlled motivation was unrelated to goal attainment (Sheldon & Elliot, 1998). Other
studies including Shahar et al. (2006) have failed to find a negative association between controlled motivation and goal progress, and Judge,
Bono, Erez, and Locke (2005) reported nonsignificant positive associations between controlled motivation and progress in their two studies ofwork goals. It appears that the preponderance of evidence supports asignificant positive association between autonomous motivation andgoal progress, but does not consistently support a significant negative
association between controlled motivation and goal progress. A
comprehensive meta-analysis of previous goal self-determination
research would be needed to resolve this issue.
If the effect of self-criticism on goal progress is not mediated throughautonomous or controlled motivation, perhaps it is mediated by someother factors. The results of Study 2 suggest that self-critics' tendencies
toward rumination and procrastination play a role in mediating the effects of self-criticism on goal progress. It is possible that the focus of theself-critic on potential failure, critical evaluation or the potential erosionof self-esteem leads to a process of obsessive rumination and procrastination that in turn compromises successful goal attainment. The current
findings indicate such a process, which is consistent with Rheaume etal.'s (2000) study of maladaptive perfectionists. It appears that the
self-regulatory functioning of the self-critic may be impaired by boththe focus on evaluative concerns and the ruminative practices that may
be engendered. We did not assess the precise content of the ruminations,but it seems reasonable to speculate that they may be focused on potential failure and or potential external evaluation, judgment or criticism.
Euture research is needed to examine the exact nature and content of

838

POWERS ET AL.

these run\inations and other aspects of the self-critics' ruminative practices, as they appear to be substantial predictors of reported goal progress. It would also be useful to examine not only the predisposing trait ofself-criticism but, additionally, the process of self-critical activity thatthe self-<ritics engage in as they pursue their goals.
LIMITATIONS
The present research is limited in a number of ways. To begin, the measure of goal progress was either a single or three-item measure andbased solely on self-report. Multiple and more direct measures of goal
progress such as observations, or actual weight measurements would bea desirable addition. Likewise, the measure of rumination and procrastination was brief and not validated; therefore, interpretation of the mediation effect must be tentative until the results can be replicated with
better validated measures. Although we used prospective designs, thecore analyses of the present studies were correlational, and therefore, it
is important to note that causal inferences cannot be supported. While
we suggest that the personality and motivational factors are predisposing, more complex longitudinal and experimental designs would be required to establish causal links. The prospective design in Studies 1 and
2 was also based on a relatively short time duration between the collection of data for the predictor and the goal progress measures (one monthin Study 1 and one week in Study 2). Given this short time frame, it is difficult to know if the effects of the predictor variables on goal progress
would be sustained if a longer time period had elapsed before data on
the goal progress measures were collected. The current studies are also
limited by being restricted to a college student sample. Future researchwould be needed to generalize these results to the population at large orto demonstrate differences among groups. These results particularly callfor examination in a clinical sample of overweight or obese individuals.
Finally, our relatively small sample sizes substantially limited thecapacity to employ more sophisticated statistical modeling.
CONCLUSIONSThe present results are in agreement with Shahar et al. (2003) that bothself-criticism and autonomy are important factors in personal functioning. Self-criticism is significantly associated with diminished goal progress, and this effect appears to be mediated at least in part by ruminationand procrastination. These among other potential factors appear to limit
the self-critic's capacity to freely and adaptively pursue his or her goals.

SELF- CRITICISM A N D GOAL PROGRESS

839

and these effects appear to be present across several arenas of goal pursuit, including academic, social, and health-related goals.
Consistent with prior research, the current results also demonstratethat autonomy is an important predictor of goal progress. In particular,
the results on weight loss goals confirm the importance of autonomous
self-regulation in weight management, and they have significant potential implications for weight management and disease management ingeneral. Weight loss in particular, but other forms of disease management as well, present a challenging arena for health care professionals
and significant others. The temptation is always great to intervene withthe best of intentions; however, efforts that fail to support autonomy orthat in fact undermine autonomous self-regulation may sabotage thevery success these efforts are intended to promote. Alternatively, interventions that are specifically designed to support autonomous goal
related motivation may provide a substantial boost to these intervention
efforts.
Both self-criticism and autonomy appear to be important predictorsof goal progress; however, they appear to exert their effects independently. Understanding the pursuit of goals, whether as a self-directed
process or as part of a health care intervention, requires a nuanced andcomprehensive consideration of both the important influences of personality and of different types of motivation as well.
REFERENCES
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social
psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 51,1173-1182.

Blatt, S. J. (1995). The destructiveness of perfectionism. Implications for the treatment of depression. American Psychologist, 50,1003-1020.
Blatt, S. J. (2004). Experiences of depression: Theoretical, clinical and research perspectives. Wash-

ington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Blatt, S. ]., D'Affliti, J. P., & Quinlan, D. M. (1976). Experiences of depression in normal
young adults, journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85,383-389.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs andthe self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54,493-503.

Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A., & Locke, E. A. (2005) Core self-evaluations and job and life
satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment, journal of Applied
Psychology, 90,257-268.

Koestner, R., Horberg, E. J., Gaudreau, P, Powers, T. A., DiDio, P., Bryan, C, Jochum, R., &Salter, N. (2006). Bolstering implementation plans for the long haul: The benefits ofsimultaneously boosting self-concordance or self-efficacy. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 32,1-12.

840

POWERS ET AL.

Koestner, R., Lekes, N., Powers, T. A., & Chicoine, E. (2002). Attaining personal goals: Autonomy plus implementation intentions equals success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83,231-244.
Koestner, R., Losier, G., Vallerand, R., & Carducci, D. (1996). Identified and introjected
forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 70,1025-1036.
Norcross, J.C, Ratzin, A. C, & Payne, D. (1989) Ringing in the New Year: Change processes
and reported outcomes of resolutions. Addictive Behavior, 14, 205-212.
Rheaume, J., Freeston, M. H., Ladouceur, R., Bouchard, C, Gallant, L., Talbot, F., &Vallieres, A. (2000). Functional and dysfunctional perfectionists: Are they different
on compulsive-like behaviors? Behavior Research and Therapy, 38,119-128.
Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. /oMrnn/of Personality, 63,397-427.
Shahar, G., Henrich, G. C, Blatt, S. J., Ryan, R., & Little, T. (2003). Interpersonal relatedness,
self-definition, and their motivational orientation during adolescence: A theoretical and empirical integration. Developmental Psychology, 39,470-483.
Shahar, G., Kanitzki, E., Shulman, S., & Blatt, S. J. (2006). Personality, motivation and theconstruction of goals during the transition to adulthood. Personality and Individual
Differences, 40,53-63.
Sheeran, P., Milne, S., Webb, T., & GoUwitzer, P. M. (2005). Implementation intentions andhealth behaviors. In M. Gonner and P. Norman (Eds.) Predicting health behavior: Research and practice with social cognition models (pp. 276-323). Buckingham, UK: Open
University Press.
Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., & GoUwitzer, P. M. (2005). The interplay between goal intentions
and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31,87-98.
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Gomparing autonomous and controlled reasons as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality andSocial Psychology Bulletin, 24,546-557.
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need-satisfaction, and longitudinalwell-being: The autonomy model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76,
482-497.
Sheldon, K. M., & Houser-Marko, L. (2001) Autonomy, goal attainment, and the pursuit ofhappiness: Gan there be an upward spiral? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80,152-165.
Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not
all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24,1319-1331.
Williams, G. G., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R., & Deci, E. L.(1996). Motivational
predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,115-126.
Williams, G. G., Gagne, M., Ryan, R., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 21,40-50.
Williams, G. G., Minicucci, D. S., Kouides, R., Levesque, G.S., Ghirov, V.I., Ryan, R., & Deci,
E. L. (2002). Self-determination, smoking and health. Health Education Research Theory and Practice, 17, 512-521.