4. Visible and Invisible Aspects in the Current Evaluation System 1203F
17S
08F
19S
16S
11S
01F
18S
05F
10S
15S
12S
14S
06F
20S
21S
23S
04F
09S
02F
13S
07F
22S
std

A(S)
A-(A+)
B(A)
B-(B+)C(B)
C-(C+)
D(C)F

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%

70%

80%90%100%

3Category

GPA

Humanity

2.63

Language

2.40

Subject

Chemistry

Major Basic

Major

GPA

2.21

Physics

2.33

Mathematics

2.64

Environment/
Biology

1.84

Information

3.48

2.41

Style

GPA

Lecture2.04

Seminar/Practice2.97

Lecture2.00

Seminar/Practice

2.55

2.25 （except for Graduation project: 2.20）

408091011100908

11100908

11

Subject １
Subject 2
Subject 3mamb
mamb
mamb
mamb
mamb
mamb
mamb
mamb
ma
mb
ma
mb
ma
mb
mamb

A(S)
A-(A+)
B(A)
B-(B+)C(B)
C-(C+)
D(C)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

53.7

Average Score

3.5
3.3

QⅠ
QⅡ'
QⅢ
線形 (QⅡ')
線形 (QⅠ)
線形 (QⅢ)

3.1
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.3
0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

S ratio6

Revision7Current System
University Evaluation Office
Fac. Prof. Meeting
Fac. Educ. Comm.

Deans Meeting

Educ. Center, FD Sec.

adviseImprovement
ReportDept. Prof. Meeting

Dean, Program Chair

Dept. Teacher Meeting
reportEvaluation

Outside Program Evaluation
advisereportInspection on
attainment
and product

Alumni survey

SETInquiry atgraduation
Inter-subject Meeting

Teaching and Learning
Students
Study Advisers

Program83. Evaluation and the Society

Employers
don’t believe
attainment inUniversity

Students believe
the semiautomatic
graduation after
4 years.
Strict internal
evaluation willcause thedecrease ofapplicants.

to Graduate Education/ Employment

Alumni survey
Survey on
graduation

Evaluation of Graduation ProjectSET

Education
Evaluation of course-work attainment
OutsideEvaluation on
Education

Entrance Exam.
First-year
Acceptance of students:
surveyaccording to the admission policy
Internal Inspection

Internal Quality Assurance

Interaction between University (Education)and the Society

9

・They want to evaluate the applicants by their own way.
－Very long JOB hunting period.
・They call the applicants together even during the class term.
・Most of their “own way” is “presentation” and decision by majority.
－Less reliable than the University Score (?!)
・They decide very early, while graduation is ambiguous.

Employers
don’t believe
attainment inUniversity.
Strict internal
evaluation willcause thedecrease ofapplicants.

・eg. JABEE universities can attract less applicants.
・If we do the Quality Assurance seriously,
we might not be able to attract students, whose quality and ability
we can assure.
・Applicants dislike “hard-to-graduate” universities.

Students
believe thesemiautomaticgraduation
after 4 years.

・Some student said “when you accepted me,
you must allow (let) me graduate!”
・To avoid complex troubles,teachers will give passing grades even to unattained students.
・Office of academic affairs will almost automatically issue
graduation-promising certificates.

University doubts the society, and the society doesn’t believe universities.
（ ONLY University “Brand” is reliable (?) ）University must obtain the reliance on the degree by (serious) evaluation.

104. Visible and Invisible Aspects in the Current Evaluation System
Traditional Evaluation: Mainly “Knowledge” to reinforce skill and technique.
However: GPA score andGraduation Project：
performance of (graduation) project have deviation.
Interactive
Seminar/Practice andSome students are with higher GPA , but poor idea.
more.
Some are with lower GPA , but good sense in project.
Integrated subject

How do we understand the fruits and attainment, which are not quantified?
Self-cultivation (Bildung), Creativity・・・Repeatedly described2012.03

CCE - Univ. SC <Discussion Summary>

2011.04～ School Course Guidelines
2008.12・・
1998.10

CCE <Report>
UC <Report>

教育 (Japanese: kyou-iku, Chinese: jiào-yù)：
教える(teach) 育てる(bring up, foster)11

Thank you for your attention.

12