INTERNATIONAL TROPICAL TIMBER ORGANIZATIONITTO
PROJECT PROPOSAL

SUMMARY
The public-privately initiated biosphere reserve, Giam Siak Kecil Bukit Batu Biosphere Reserve (GSK-BR) in theprovince of Riau of Sumatra, has been recognized as the UNESCO World Monitoring Networks in 2009. This biospherereserve, which covers an area of approximately 705,000 ha in total, has not been sustainably managed in accordance withexisting biosphere concept. The main problems facing reserve management include weaknesses in planning frameworkof GSK-BR including absence of an integrated strategic management plan, weak capacity of concerned institutions in
implementing the biosphere reserve concept and poor participation of local communities in management operations.
The proposed project is intended to initiate an effective implementation of sustainable management and conservation of
GSK-BR.
The overall objective of the project is to contribute to realizing the management objectives and basic functions of GSKBR; more specifically, it is necessary to perform sustainable management and conservation of the reserve in an effective
manner. The expected outputs are: i) planning framework of GSK-BR enhanced, ii) institutional capacity to manage
GSK-BR strengthened, and iii) support of stakeholders, especially the local communities, on operational management of
GSK-BR promoted. All planned activities including the developed planning framework and integrated management
plan will be implemented collaboratively by local institutions and stakeholders, Ministry of Environment and Forestry,
provincial government of Riau, Sinarmas Forestry and Partners as well as local communities and indigenous people
living in and around the biosphere reserve area.
EXECUTING
AGENCYFOREST RESEARCH AND DEVEOPMENT CENTER, FORESTRYRESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INOVASION AGENCY (FORDA),MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTRY (MOEF)

COLLABORATING AGENCY

SINIRMAS FORESTRY & PARTNERS

DURATION

36 MONTHS (PHASE I: 24 MONTHS, PHASE II: 12 MONTHS)APPROXIMATESTARTING DATETO BE DETERMINEDBUDGET AND PROPOSEDSOURCES OF FINANCE
PHASE I

PHASE II

SourceITTO
Gov’t of Indonesia
Sinarmas Forestry & Partners
Total

250,000
11,424
230,590492,014

ITTO
Gov’t of Indonesia
Sinarmas Forestry & Partners
Total
Grand Total

248,154
6,272
125,820
380,246872,260(in-kind)(cash/in-kind)(in-kind)(cash/in-kind)Project Brief
Giam Siak Kecil-Bukit Batu Biosphere Reserve (GSK-BR) is located in Riau province of Sumatra island. It
has been officially designated as a UNESCO World Monitoring Network in 2009. GSK-BR covers terrestrial,
coastal areas and marine ecosystem of approximately 705,000 ha in total. This public- private sector initiativeis intended to promote biodiversity conservation and sustainable use of tropical peat swamp forests in northeastern part of Sumatra. This biosphere reserve is divided into core area, buffer zone and transition area.
The core area with a total of 179,000 ha, consists of two wildlife Reserves (Giam Siak Kecil and Bukit Batu)
and production forests. Buffer zone with a total area of 222.000 ha consists of industrial forest plantation andother production forests; whereas the transition area with a total area of 304.000 ha consists of estate-crop
plantation, agriculture, community settlements and plantation forests.
The key problem addressed is “Sustainable management and conservation of GSK-BR is not effectively
implemented”. The specific objective is therefore to initiate an effective implementation of sustainable
management and conservation of GSK-BR. The primary causes of the key problem identified are poor
planning framework including the absence an integrated strategic management plan, weak institutional
capacity in managing the reserve and lack of support from concerned authorities and main stakeholders to
implement biosphere reserve concept. The management plan based on landscape management approachhas not been comprehensively discussed with concerned stakeholders and authorities, even though amanagement coordinating board (MCB) has been officially formed. Mechanism for stakeholders involvement
and support has not been developed making all existing infrastructures do not function effectively. Poor publicawareness, participation, poverty and other related problems also cause weak implementation of sustainable
management in this biosphere reserve.
Immediate intervention is urgently needed to initiate an effective implementation of biosphere reserve
management and conservation. This proposed project is intended to provide solution to the problem. The
development objective is to contribute to realizing the basic functions and management objectives of GSKBR; its specific objective is to initiate effective implementation of sustainable management and conservationof GSK-BR consistent with the concept of biosphere reserve development. The expected outputs are planning
framework of GSK-BR enhanced, institutional capacity to manage GSK-BR strengthened and support of
stakeholders on operational management of GSK-BR promoted.
Several parties will receive benefits/advantages through achievement of the project objectives and outputs,
primarily sound and sustainable management of GSK-BR in accordance with landscape management
approach, improved management operational capacity and mechanisms that enable the enhancement ofachieving the goals and objectives of GSK-BR development. The beneficiaries are local communities,
provincial and local governments, Sinarmas Forestry & Partners as the major concession holder in thisbiosphere reserve areas, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, National Institute of Sciences, ScientificResearch institutions, Universities and NGOs.
This project will be implemented by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry in collaboration with Sinarmas
Forestry & Partners, private-public stakeholders, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Universities and local
governments at different levels. The participation of these stakeholders is identified and accommodated since
the formulation stage. The integrated management plan of the GSK-BR is one of the important outcomes ofthe project and essential instrument to ensure sustainable management of the reserve. Therefore, this shallbe used and implemented collaboratively by concerned authorities primarily by the provincial and local
governments, DG of Forest Protection and Nature Conservation (MoEF) and Sinarmas Forestry & Partners
as well as other relevant partners.

ii

Achieving the project’s specific objective and outputs, should contribute to the enhancement of sustainable
management and conservation of GSK-BR. To this end, all relevant stakeholders must consistently support
project implementation operations for which the stakeholders are to be involved in the project since the stageof project formulation.
To execute the project activities, needed resources must be secured. The project is divided into two Phases.
For Phase I of the 24 months, funding contributions are expected from ITTO US$ 250,000, Sinarmas Forestry& Partners US$ 230,590 (cash and in kind) and the Government of Indonesia US$ 11,424 (in kind) giving a
total project budget of US$ 492,014. For Phase II of the 12 months, funding contributions are expected from
ITTO US$ 248,154, Sinarmas Forestry & Partners US$ 125,820 (cash and in kind) and the Government ofIndonesia US$ 6,272 (in kind) giving a total project budget of US$ 380,246. The allocation of the ITTO budget
is approximately 31% for personnel and 1% for capital items as most investment is to be covered by Sinarmas
Forestry & Partners.

iii

List of Abbreviation and Acronyms

BAPPEDABBKSDA
CA
CBD
FRDC
CITES
CS
DFA
DGFPNC
EA
ES
FORDA
GCPD
GSK-BR
FRI
UIR
IC
IdeA
ITTA
ITTO
IIS
LEO
MAB
MCB
MOEF
NC
NGO
PC
PFA
PSF
SMF and P
ULKUNUNESCOUR= Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Daerah (Local Government Planningand Development Agency)= Balai Besar Konservasi Sumberdaya Alam –Riau (Natural Resources
Conservation Agency) of Riau
= Collaborating Agency= Convention on Biological Diversity= Forest Research and Development Center= Convention on International Trade of Endangered species of wild Fauna andFlora= Campaigning Specialist= District Forestry Agency= Directorate General of Forest Protection and Nature Conservation= Executing Agency= Environmental Services= Forestry Research, Development and Inovation Agency= Global Consulting Project Development (URS)= Giam Siak Kecil-Bukit Batu Biosphere Reserve= Forest Research Institute= Universitas Islam Riau (Islamic University of Riau)= International Consultant= Innovative Development for Eco-Awareness= International Tropical Timber Agreement= International Tropical Timber Organization= Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI= Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia)= Local Event Organizer= Man and Biosphere= Management Coordinating Board= Ministry of Enronment and Forestry of Indonesia= National Consultant= Non-Governmental Organization= Project Coordinator= Provincial Forestry Agency= Peak Swamp Forest= Sinarmas Forestry & Partners= Universitas Lancang Kuning (University of Lancang Kuning, Riau)= University= United Nations on Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization= University of Riau

iv

Table of Contents

Part 1
1.1
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.4
Part 2
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
Part 3
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.4.1
3.4.2
3.4.3
3.4.4
3.4.5
3.5
3.5.1
3.5.2
3.5.3
3.5.4
3.5.5
3.6
3.6.1
3.6.2
Part 4
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
4.2
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
Annex 1
Annex 2

Summary
Project Brief
List of Abbreviation and Acronym
Table of Contents
Project Context
OriginRelevance
Conformity with ITTO’s objectives and priorities
Relevance to Indonesia’s policies
Target Area
Geographic location
Social, cultural, economic and environmental aspects
Expected outcomes at project completion
Project Rationale and Objectives
Rationale
Institutional set-up and organizational issues
Stakeholder analysis
Problem analysis
Logical framework matrix
Objectives
Development objective and impact indicators
Specific objective and outcome indicators
Description of Project Interventions
Outputs and activities
Outputs
Activities
Implementation approaches and methods
Workplan
Budget-Phase I
Master budget schedule
Consolidated yearly budget
ITTO yearly budget
Sinarmas Forestry & Partners yearly budget
Executing Agency yearly budget (GOI)
Budget-Phase II
Master budget schedule
Consolidated yearly budget
ITTO yearly budget
Sinarmas Forestry & Partners yearly budget
Executing Agency yearly budget (GOI)
Assumptions, risks, sustainability
Assumptions and risks
Sustainability
Implementation Arrangements
Organization Structure and Stakeholder Involvement Mechanism
Executing agency and partners
Project management teamProject steering committee (PSC)
Stakeholder involvement mechanism
Reporting, review, monitoring and evaluation
Dissemination and mainstreaming of project learning
Dissemination of project learning
Mainstreaming of project learning
Profile of the Executing Agency
Profile of the Collaborating Agency
v

i
ii
iv
v
1
2
2
3
4
4
4
7
9
9
10
11
14
16
16
16
17
17
17
19
20
23
23
28
29
30
31
32
32
37
38
39
40
41
41
41
43
43
43
44
44
45
45
45
46
47
49

Annex 3 Key personnel to be provided by EA and CA
Annex 4 Outlines of terms of reference (TOR) for key personnel and professionals to be paid withITTO funds
Annex 5 The recommendations of the 46th Expert Panel and the respective modifications madeAnnex 6 The recommendations of the 47th Expert Panel and the respective modifications made

vi

49
50
51
52

PART 1. PROJECT CONTEXT
1.1. Origin
As to date, the Government of Indonesia and UNESCO Indonesia MAB Programme have declared theestablishment of eight (19) biosphere reserves in Indonesia covering a total area of approximately 3.911(perlu
update) million hectares in eight provinces of the country, namely Central Kalimantan, West Java, Central
Sulawesi, West Nusa Tenggara, West Sumatra, Aceh, Riau and South-East Sulawesi. The Giam Siak KecilBukit Batu Biosphere Reserve, hereinafter called GSK-BR for short, is the seventh one, announced on 26
May 2009 with a total area of approximately 705.271 hectares; GSK-BR is a unique but also fragile peatland
ecosystem, highly vulnerable to drastic environmental changes, particularly as a result of human activities; inaddition, the ecosystem plays a vital role in serving as a natural sponge-like water reservoir, carbon sink,wildlife habitat and key supporter of economic and cultural well-being of local communities.
It is worth noting that GSK-BR is probably the first and only one in the world at present, as co- managed
initiative on blending environmental conservation and sustainable management involving public and private
sectors, namely the Indonesian UNESCO MAB Programme, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Ministryof Environment and Forestry, Local Government of Riau, other cooperating parties and Sinar Mas Forestry
and Partners (SMF & P). The co-management style in place is necessitated by the fact that private sector,
SMF & P in particular, have been operating in the areas even prior to designation of the biosphere reserve in2009.
In response to the serious threats facing GSK-BR sustainability, the Riau BBKSDA (Natural Resources
Conservation Agency) and SMF & P have collaboratively undertaken a number of relevant initiatives andactivities these include:•

Scientific research education and related activities covering biodiversity assessment and monitoringwith LIPI, Kyoto University, University of Riau (UR) and University of Islamic Riau (UIR), Forestry
Research Development and Inovation Agency (FORDA) and Forest Research Institute (FRI)
Pekanbaru, Riau;•

Social, economic, cultural and demographic studies with UR, Kyoto University and LIPI•

Environmental services studies including eco-tourism and carbon stock assessment with IPB
University, Kyoto University, LIPI, Indonesian Branch of the Global Consulting Project Development(URS) and Innovative Development for Eco-Awareness (IdeA)•

Hydrology and water management studies with Kyoto University and UR•

Bio-prospecting studies with LIPI, Tokyo University, Kyoto University, UR, UIR, Lancang Kuning
University (LKU), IPB University and University of Mulawarman (UnMul)•

Forest ecosystem restoration with UR, Kyoto University and Askul Japan•

Put in place robust institutional arrangements, increased capacities for the eco-management of andattract participation in the GSK-BR management through an executive decision of the Governor of
Riau No. Kpts. 920/V/2010 of May 14, 2010•

Containment of encroachment, slash-and-burn farming; control of illegal logging; restoration of forest
ecosystem with economic benefit to villagers and; tapping of ecosystem services for well-being of
local communities in order to abandon their unsustainable practices.
1

Despite the initiatives and activities that have been undertaken, some are still in progress, serious
problems and constraints facing sustainable management remain intact; notable ones among these are thoserelating to weak planning framework, particularly unavailability of an integrated strategic management planfor guiding coordinated management practices, weak institutional capacity despite the already establishedcoordinating board for GSK-BR management, and limited support by local stakeholders to operational
management. This proposed project is the initiative of FRDC, BBKSDA and SMF & P in close consultation
with main stakeholders in their attempt to obtaining assistance of ITTO in resolving the aforementioned main
problems and it is built on findings of and lessons learned from previous activities in close consultation with
the Seville Strategy and Madrid Action Plan for bioshpere reserve development. Indeed, proposed project will
also greatly assist in continuation or expansion of the relevant activities that have been initiated, particularly
those ones relating to enhancement of institutional capacity and strengthening of incentives for local
stakeholders to actively participate in future reserve management operations.

1.2. Relevance1.2.1.

Conformity with ITTO objectives and priorities

This proposed project will contribute to the sustainable management of tropical peat swamp forest,
specifically to biosphere reserve in Riau province. The project contribution is achieved through theenhancement of planning framework of GSK-BR by developing an integrated strategic management plan
(ISMP), institutional capacity building and increased participation of local communities and other relevant
stakeholders in reserve management. This project is, therefore, relevant to the objectives of ITTA 2006,
specifically to:•

Objective 3: to provide contribution to the sustainable development of tropical forest. This proposed
project is relevant since the activities are directed to support the sustainable management of peatswamp forest, which is part of Indonesian tropical forests.

•

Objective 6: to support research and development to improve forest management and non-forest
values of tropical forests. The proposed project contains various research activities on biologicaldiversity, ecology and environmental services which is also relevant to this ITTA objective.

•

Objective 18: to promote the important role of indigenous and local people. This project is particularly
relevant to this objective since this one component of the project is to improve livelihood of local
communities and indigenous people residing in and around the reserve area. Capacity building of
local communities and indigenous people are to be improved through various activities, especiallytraining on income generating activities, such as development of non-timber forest products, fisheries
and environmental services.

This proposed project is also relevant to ITTO Strategic Action Plan 2013-2018, especially to:•Strategic Action Plan 3: Enhance the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in tropical
producing countries.
Most aspects of this proposed project are addressing the conservation and sustainable use of
biological diversity (ecosystems, habitat and species) in the biosphere reserve, the habitat of over
200 plants species, mammals, birds, freshwater fishes, reptiles and amphibian. In this proposed
project, those will be further explored to ensure their conservation. In addition, each zone of thebiosphere reserve will be delineated and managed to ensure the conservation and protection of
habitat using appropriate measures including for economic and community development. Data and2

information of the existing ecosystem will be updated and a database management system will also
be developed.
•

ITTO Strategic Action Plan 4: Reduce tropical deforestation and forest degradation and enhance theprovision of environmental services.
The proposed project addresses the high potential conflicts of landuse especially in the buffer zone
and transition area, which currently are utilized for forest, non-forest, and other economic as well as
human development activities. Capacity building, especially for local communities and indigenous
people will be carried out, primarily for income generating activities to improve prosperity. By
improving prosperity, the pressure on the existing natural resources will decrease and so will threatsof deforestation and forest degradation. In addition, the legal framework developed under the projectfor utilization and development of environmental services and other economic potentials will also
contribute to income generation. Therefore, this project is highly relevant to this ITTO Strategic ActionPlan.

1.2.2.

Relevance to Indonesia’s policies

This proposed project is highly relevant to the national policies as it is a concrete operationalization ofIndonesian Law No. 5/1990 regarding the conservation of biological diversity, which could be achieved
through biosphere reserve management approach. This project also supports the implementation of UN
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and field implementation of conservation strategy as described inIndonesian Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (IBSAP) 2003-2020, by Indonesian Board for Planning andDevelopment (BAPPENAS).
The Ministry of Forestry has also embarked in six priority programs for 2010-2014 and this proposed
project will support the following priority programs:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)

Biodiversity conservation,
Re-enforcement of permanent forest estate,
Forest resources protection and fire control,
Revitalization of forest utilization and forest industries,
Empowerment of forest local communities, andRehabilitation and improvement of carrying capacity of catchment areas.

This proposed project is also relevant to the MoF strategic plan to ensure the achievement of forest
protection and nature conservation, through the establishment of management systems, reduction of land
conflict and pressure on the national park and conservation areas and improvement of service for ecotourism.
In this proposed project, achievement is enhanced through implementation of ISMP of GSK- BR. The ISMP
should be the primary reference by all authorities and stakeholders, including local communities andindigenous people in the reserve area management in accordance with the principles and framework of
biosphere reserve development. The project also contributes to the improvement of capacity for officials andcommunities living surrounding the area through training and other capacity building measures (i.e income
generating activities and improving livelihood) which are all relevant to the MoEF programs. The formulationof framework for the utilization and management of environmental services, including conserving the existing
carbon stock is also relevant to the MoEF program on the mitigation and adaptation of climate change.
According to completed preliminary study, this biosphere reserve contains huge carbon content, estimatedat 1.7 billions tons. If sound management operations could be implemented, this huge carbon potential could
be safely protected from emising.

31.3. Target Areas
1.3.1.

Geographical area

This proposed project will be implemented in Biosphere Reserve of Giam Siak Kecil Bukit Batu (GSKBR) area. This GSK-BR is located in the province of Riau, Sumatra, with the total area of approximately
705,271 ha (Figure 1). Geographical posisition is in 1010 11’ -1020 10’ East and 0044’-10 11’ North. According
to government administration, the BR area is located in the district of Bengkalis (66%), in district of Siak (30%)
and the district of Dumai (4%). Accessibility to the BR is moderate; it could be easily reached from threenearest cities of Bengkalis, Siak Sri Indrapura and Dumai, by land or river. To reach this BR from Pekanbaru,
the capital city of Riau Province, it takes approximately 3-5 hours by boat.
This GSK-BR covers major peat swamp forest ecosystems and a number of small lakes. This biospherereserve, as described earlier, is rich of biological diversity (ecosystem, habitat, species), such as plant
species, large mammals, freshwater fish, birds, reptiles and amphibians. The area covers by the project ismainly reserve areas of peat swamp forests which consists of production forests, conservation forests andother non-forest uses, such as estate crop plantations (rubber and oil palm plantation) and industrial
plantation forests owned by several concession companies and local communities.
1.3.2.

Social, cultural, economic and environmental aspects(a). Social and cultural aspects•

This GSK-BR is distributed in three Districts (Bengkalis, Siak and Dumai). Bengkalis district consistsof 8 sub-districts with over 102 villages in 2011 with a total population of over 500,000 people; theSiak district consists of 14 sub-districts with more than 57 villages and 319,221 of population in 2010.
The number of villages which are located in and nearby the reserve is 53 villages with a total
population of about 100,000 people. The population density is relatively low but people mostly arelacking of formal education and skills.

•

The critical condition to be considered is the fact that villagers in this area live in poverty, uneducatedand unskilled, lack of basic social services and such infrastructures as for education, health andsocial welfare.

Various ethnic groups have been living scatteredly in this reserve and forming families for decades now. They
are originated from Malay, mixture of Malay, Javanese, Bataknese, transmigrant and other sumatranorigins. They have a wide range of educational background and level. Some village communities havecultural concept which implements balance between forest and environments. The control mechanism
comes from their beliefs and faith and the existing traditional wisdom. The existing culture slowly evolves to
consumptive behaviour which influences the current daily life pattern.

4Figure 1. The geographical area of proposed project (Riau Province).

Source: Sinarmas Forestry, 20105

(b). Economic Aspect•

In general, the province of Riau is one of the richest provinces in Indonesia with the primary sourcesof income from mining, oil production, forestry, agriculture and fisheries.

•

Local community livelihood is still mostly dependent on agriculture sector, primarily palm oil, rubber,cacao, coconut and fisheries. Most of the local communities have developed extensive area of rubber
plantation since centuries ago. The total area of rubber plantation in Riau province today is nearly
500,000 Ha of which about 86% is owned by local communities while area of palm oil plantation had
reached a total of 2,630.000 ha in 2012, 41% of which is owned by the communities.

•

Other sources of income are as farmers, laborers in forest concession and estate crop plantations,traders, public servant, fisherman, hunter, collection of timber and non-forest products and othernon-permanent jobs. The daily needs for agricultural products such as rice is supplied mostly fromother areas within the province.

•

The existing natural resources have contributed significantly to prosperity of the communities throughtraditional way of utilization. The proposed project will introduce the sustainable way of natural
resources utilization. The sustainable utilization which will provide continuity of income, which in turn,contribute to sustainable management of natural resources.

(c). Environmental aspect•

This biosphere reserve possesses one of the pristine and unique ecosystems in peat swamp forestsof Riau province. This ecosystem harbors a unique eco-biodiversity, performs life- support function
and other important environmental services and various economic opportunities. Under the biospherereserve concept this area is delineated into three areas and zone i.e. core area, buffer zone andtransition area which have differences in terms of potential purposes, status and utilization. Twowildlife reserves are located in the core area with a total area of approximately 106,467 ha.

•This biosphere reserve also contains huge carbon stocks; the recent study revealed that the total
above ground biomass-carbon equivalent reaches 44.3 millions tonnes of CO2 (estimate range 28 to
58 million tonnes of CO2). The total underground carbon content of the peat soil was estimated atmore than 1.71 billions tonnes of CO2.

•

The other unique ecosystems are small lake and rivers which have the potential for supporting life forcommunities from fishing, cultured silvo-fishery system and other related activities. These resources
potential should be kept protected from various human interventions. The existing threats areencroachment and conversion to other uses, illegal logging etc. The encroachment, conversion andillegal logging have influenced the environmental quality and ecosystem function of the reserve.

•

The biosphere reserve has also ecotourism potentials and has been visited by domestic andinternational visitors. The most potential visitors are from Malaysia and Singapore, coming forrecreation and cultural visit (i.e Siak Sri Indrapura, capital city of Siak District).

6

A biosphere reserve is an area of terresterial and coastal/marine ecosystem or a combination thereof,
which is internationally recognized within framework of UNESCO’s program on man and the Bisophere(MAB). It is established to promote and demonstrate sustainable development model and a balanced
relationship between human and the biosphere. A BR is a landscape which includes one or more protectedareas and its surroundings that are managed to combine both conservation and sustainable use of natural
resources. In accordance with the concept of Biosphere Reserve Development under MAB program, any
biosphere reserve is intended to fulfill three complementary functions of a biosphere reserve, namely: i) a
conservation function to preserve genetic resources, species, ecosystems and landscapes; ii) a development
function to foster sustainable economic and human development, and iii) a logistic support function to support
demonstration projects, environmental education and training, and research and monitoring related to local,
national and global issues of conservation and sustainable development.

1.4. Expected outcomes at project completion
The objective of this project is primarily to perform management of GSK-BR consistently with the conceptof biosphere reserve development through provision of several pre-requisite conditions. The Governor of Riau
has fully supported the GSK-BR by forming a coordinating board in 2010 which aimed to enhance thecommunication and coordination across stakeholders and to implement operational activities of this reserve.
In addition to the Governor supports, the project will facilitate creation of several conditions and expected tobe achieved within the project duration, as listed below:•

An integrated strategic management plan (ISMP) formulated and widely adopted,•

The existing Coordinating Board functioning well,•

Protocols and SOP of management operations formulated and ready to be used to guidemanagement operations,•Staffs and personnel responsible for managing GSK-BR well trained,•

Local communities and indigenous people receive training, especially those related to income
generating activities,•

Previously initiated community development programs continue strengthening, and•Legal framework for utilization of environmental services formulated and public campaign start
receiving positive responses.

The above conditions should technically and legally enable long-term operationalization of GSK-BR
management in accordance with UNESCO’s biosphere reserve landscape management approaches. In
addition, at project completion, updated data and information will also be available for uses, including
information on biological diversity, ecological and other economic potential from existing environmental
services.
Project results and outputs are expected to generate favorable changes to situation upon projectcompletion; notable among these are:•Installed data-base system would aid realistic decision making on reserve management andfacilitate effective promotion of GSK-BR development•

Implementation of a legitimate ISMP should ensure proper implementation of planned activities bydifferent relevant actors•

Well functioning of the management coordinating board would facilitate effective management
decision making and operations through better coordination, communication and division of work thatavoid confusion and disharmony of relation between the stakeholders in general, authorities inparticular7•Developed protocols and SOP on management operations should contribute to effective
management operations through well-defined tasks and responsibilities of the parties involved•

Dissemination of practical manuals on income generating activities would facilitate effective
replication of activities by local communities in other areas subject to existing forestry rules andprocedures•

The launching of campaign on GSK-BR development would improve understanding of stakeholders
on the socio-economic and environmental values of the biosphere reserve.

8

PART 2. PROJECT RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE
2.1. Rationale
2.1.1. Institutional set-up and organizational issues
GSK-BR is a private-public initiative to promote and demonstrate sustainable management acrosslandscapes of the reserve. The landscape consists of protected and conservation areas (two wildlife
reserves), production forests (industrial forest plantation) and estate crops (rubber and palm oil plantations)and community settlements. This reserve was proposed by the Government of Indonesia and in 2009, it was
officially recognized with its inclusion into the UNESCO World Monitoring Network, as a biosphere reserve.
To operate the GSK-BR, a Coordinating Board was formed by Riau Governor consisting of local government
authorities, Indonesian Institute of Science, representative from Ministry of Environment and Forestry,
Sinarmas Forestry and Partners and other relevant institutions. In general, the main functions of thisManagement Coordinating Board (MCB) are to:•••Develop core area for conservation, education and research
Develop buffer zone for sustainable and environmentally sound management and development
Develop transition areas for economic development and empowerment.

The specific roles of the MCB are to:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Provide general direction to the overall management of biosphere reserve
Establish common understanding across authorities and stakeholders
Integrate activities across authorities and stakeholders
Formulate operational plan and priority action
Adopt of the plan and priority action
Provide direction and recommendation on the resolution of issues and conflicts.

Currently, the operational management of this reserve remains weak and the coordinating board does
not function effectively. The proposed project aimed to remove present gaps and barriers to achieving theultimate goal of biosphere reserve management in accordance with UNESCO landscape management
approach. Several institutions will take part in the removal of the present gaps and barriers:•

The Provincial Agency for Planning and Development (BAPPEDA) has the main duty to set-up
provincial development plan taking ISMP into account and to facilitate the effective implementationof ISMP;•Natural Resources Conservation Agency (BBKSDA) of Riau has the main duty to manage andconserve the existing wildlife reserves inside the reserve including their biological diversity thus will
involve in the implementation of selected activities primarily those related to the core area incollaboration with Sinar Mas Forestry and Partners;•

Universities and other relevant institutions such as the Indonesian Man and Biosphere Program of
the Indonesian Institute of Science (IIS) will be involved in monitoring of management operations
especially with respect to activities on conservation, research and education in collaboration with theForest Research and Development Center of FORDA and;•The other institutions of the provincial government will also play important role in developing
framework for continued and long-term implementation of GSK-BR management plan, community
development, forestry and non-forest plantation as well as other economic and human development
activities.
9

The existing MCB will play very important role in the project implementation. The MCB will initiate a series ofmeeting to identify the gap and remove the gaps that inhibit the execution of field implementation of GSK-BR
day to day management.
2.1.2. Stakeholder analyses
A series of consultative meetings involving relevant stakeholders of GSK-BR had been organized in Bali,
Bogor, Pekanbaru (Riau) and Jakarta prior to the formulation of this project. The objective of the meetings
was to identify the existing problems and to collect relevant data and information regarding the biospherereserve. Consequences of the problem addressed and its direct as well as indirect causes were thoroughly
discussed with the stakeholders during the meeting in view of defining the relevant interventions to solving
the problems at hand.
Table 1. Summary of stakeholder consultation
Stake holders

Characteristics

Primary
1.Localcommunities

Problems, needs,interests- Users of forest resource
for wider range of purposes

Lack of knowledge andskill.

2. Provincial/
District forest
services-Responsible for managing
forest resourcesin their area

Lack of capacity inproviding necessary data

3. Sinarmas
Forestry andPartners
Secondary
4. Ministry ofEnvironment
and Forestry
5. DG of Forest
Protection andNatureConservation(BBKSDA)-Having concession areasand necessary resources-Limited capacity tocoordinate acrossinstitution-Having facilities andother resources- Governing state forests
incl wildlife reserve-Remain weak in solving
forest degradation andother related problem- Limited capacity tocollect and update dataand information including
on wildlife protection andutilization-Having authority tofacilitate-Provide policy support-Disseminate data andinformation of findings

6. DG of Forest
Production
Management
7. BAPPENAS-Administer and supervise
development of production
forests
Involve in setting thenational programs forconservation of biologicaldiversity
Facilitate community
awareness raising andprosperity

Limited capacity andhuman resource tocomplete its tasks
Limited mandate todirectly collect andupdate data andinformation- Involve in information
dissemination andcommunication with
communities- Limited access to forest
resources-Experienced in field
monitoring of forest
operations
Facilitate theimplementation ofproject findings-Facilitate information
dissemination to global for-Implementation of project
results-Future development ofcore areas-Involves in the formulationof framework, SOP andother management tools-Involve in dissemination,
analyses of findings,
setting up policies-Close collaboration
with communities-Dissemination and otherawareness raising-Scientific community-Assist in analyses of
biological diversity-Responsible formonitoring MAB-Involve in various scientificdiscussions andimplementation of
Biosphere Reserve
objective-Supervise activities

Limited updated dataand information
Need to conduct
scientific assessment forforest resources

Having capacity to
execute national R&D
activities,-Coordinate R&D activities
in GSK-BR-Disseminating results- Limited access on R&D
activities, awarenessraising and capacity
building-Having facilities andresources-Scientific meeting, local
community capacity
building

8. NGO

9. Indonesian
Institute of
Science (MAB)

Tertiery
10.FORDA(FRDC)

11. Universities- Promote strategies forlong term conservation andsustainable utilization ofvarious species- Responsible for scientificassessment on natural
resources including plant
and animal species, MAB
implementation- Responsible forsupporting scientific dataand information on forest
resource – Play animportant role in
conducting R&D- Involve in the R&D on
forestry resources,
capacity building andawareness raising

10

Potentials-Sources of labors-familiar with the sites
and habitat
Facilitate any
implementation
activities

Involvement in the
proposed project-Labors, involve in project
activities, training andawareness raising
Involve in coordinating theimplementation ofactivities,
sustainability-Involve in implementing
project activities,
sustainability

The stakeholders support the formulation and implementation of this project in order to accelerate operational
management of the biosphere reserve and to solve existing barriers and gaps. The stakeholders support thisproject by providing various necessary data and information on the current condition, emerging issues andproblems faced in the operational management of this biosphere. The stakeholders also provide informationon the huge potential for future development of this area and their potential role in the implementation of thisproject. Stakeholders analyses for this proposed project is presented in Table 1.
2.1.3. Problem analysis
The GSK-BR was formally established in 2009 covering an area of approximately 705,271 Ha in total
comprising 178,722 Ha of core area, 222,426 Ha of buffer zone and 304,123 Ha of transition area. The
reserve is intended to fulfill three complementary functions of a biosphere reserve, namely: i) a conservation
function to preserve genetic resources, species, ecosystems and landscapes; ii) a development function tofoster sustainable economic and human development, and iii) a logistic support function to support
demonstration projects, environmental education and training, and research and monitoring related to local,
national and global issues of conservation and sustainable development. The primary objective of the reserve
management is to achieve a sustainable balance between the sometimes conflicting goals of conserving
biological diversity, promoting economic development and maintaining cultural values. The biosphere reserveis the site where this objective is tested, refined, demonstrated and implemented.
As to date, however, this primary objective of GSK-BR management is admittedly difficult to realize
because implementation of operational management is weak. Therefore, the key problem to be addressedby the project is defined as “Sustainable management and conservation of GSK-BR is not effectively
implemented”. This inadequate performance is attributable to three direct causes, namely: i) weak planning
framework of GSK-BR, ii) weak institutional capacity in operational management of the reserve, and iii) limited
support of stakeholders on management operations. Upon close examination by stakeholders during theconsultative meetings that were deliberately organized for the purpose, the first direct cause “weak planning
framework” was brought about by at least four problems namely: inadequate understanding of concerned
authorities on planning framework, unclearly defined forest functions on each zone of GSK-BR, lack of reliable
updated data on the reserve and unavailability of Integrated Strategic Management Plan (ISMP).
Needed intervention to resolve the aforementioned problems should include: raising understanding ofconcerned authorities on the essence of reserve planning, ensuring sustainability of forest functions on
individual zones, compiling and managing updated reliable data on the reserve for purposes of planning anddecision making as well as developing and adopting an ISMP. It is argued that enhancing of planning
framework is almost impossible without strong commitment of concerned authorities, availability of updated
reliable data and sustainability of defined forest functions. In addition, developed ISMP is only useful as
intended when it is officially adopted thus must be endorsed by main stakeholders in general, by concerned
authorities in particular. It is worth noting at this juncture that the problem on “not well defined forest function”
is most obvious in the core area of GSK-BR. Recall that the core area covers around 178,722 Ha of forest
area comprising 106,467 Ha of wildlife reserves and 72,255 Ha of natural production forests. The production
forest is managed under a forest concession license awarded by the government to Sinar Mas & Partners.
Due to the serious forest degradation occurring in the past, there is a need to re- visit this forest concession
license in view of changing the function from production forest to forest ecosystem restoration to ensure its
sustainable management.
The second direct cause of the key problem “weak institutional capacity in operational management” isthe result of four associated problems i.e. existing management coordinating board does not function well;insufficient number of trained professionals; undefined rules of conduct on management operations, and;weak funding mechanisms to support continued management operations. The interventions needed toresolve these problems should include: strengthening of existing organization and institutional coordination,
conducting training of professionals, developing and adopting appropriate protocols and SOP for
management operations and developing a well-functioning of funding mechanism.

11

As regards the third direct cause “limited support of stakeholders on management operations”, thestakeholder consultative meetings argued that it is attributable to four forces, namely: i) poor understandingof stakeholders on values of the reserve, ii) lack of incentives for local communities to support reserve
development, iii) absence of incentive scheme for private sector to support management operations, and iv)
poor campaign program on biosphere reserve development. Correspond to the problems identified, relevantinterventions should include: improving the understanding of local communities on the functions of biospherereserve, making livelihood of local communities better through demonstration of income generating activities
with respect to their implementation and management as well as appropriate training on needed livelihood
and NTFP business skills, formulating policy on involvement of private sector in the utilization of environmental
services and initiating aggressive campaign on biosphere reserve development.
Above cause-effect relationship of the key problem addressed is summarized in Figure 2, the Problem
Tree. As the mirror of the Problem Tree, a Solution Tree has been constructed as depicted in Figure 3. The
Solution Tree clearly shows the elements of proposed project notably those means/actions relevant to solving
the different problems shown in Figure 2. Accordingly, the Solution Tree diagram has been used as the basis
for defining project objectives, outputs and activities which in turn determine the relevant implementation
approaches as well as work plan and associated budget of the project.
Figure 2. Problem Tree

The basic functions of biospherereserve not fulfilled

Sustainable management and conservation of
GSK-BR not realized.

Consequences

Sustainable management and conservation of GSK-BR not
effectively implemented

Weak planning framework of
GSK-BR

Planning framework notadequately understood byconcerned authorities
Forest functions on GSK
BR not well performed

Lack of reliable updated
data on biosphere areas

Weak institutional capacity inbiosphere reserve management

Existing management
coordinating board notfunctioning wellInsufficient number oftrained professionals
Rules of conduct onmanagement operations not
yet defined
Weak funding mechanisms
to support management
operations

Intregrated Strategic
Management Plan (ISMP)
not available

12

Core problem

Lack of support bystakeholders to management
operations

Poor understanding ofstakeholders on biospherereserve functions
Incentives for local
communities not identified
and developed
Incentive scheme forprivate sector not defined
Limited campaign on
biosphere reserve
development

Figure 3. Solution Tree
Goals and objectives of biospherereserve management achieved

The basic functions of biospherereserve fulfilled

Sustainable management and conservation of GSK-BR
effectively implemented

Planning framework of GSK-BR
enhanced

Institutional capacity inbiosphere reserve management
enhanced

Support by stakeholders tomanagement operations
promoted

Existing management
coordinating board
functioning well

Improved understandingof stakeholders on
biosphere reserve

Forest functions on GSK
BR well performed

Sufficient number of trained
professionals available

Incentives for local
communities identified anddeveloped

Reliable updated data on
biosphere areas available

Rules of conduct onmanagement operations
definedPlanning frameworkadequately understood byconcerned authorities

Intregrated Strategic
Management Plan (ISMP)
available

Funding mechanisms to
support management
operations established13

Incentive scheme forprivate sector defined

Effective campaign on
biosphere reserve
development launchedLogical framework matrix
Project elements
Development Objective
To contribute to realizing themanagement objectives and basic
functions of GSK-BR

Specific Objective
To promote an effective
implementation of sustainable
management and conservation of
GSK-BR

Outputs
Output 1:
Planning framework of GSK BR
enhanced

Indicators

Means of verification

3-4 years after project completion:- Adopted ISMP fully used to guide management
operations- At least 20 villages in 2 main districts supported
management operations
By end of year 3:- A legitimate ISMP disseminated, adopted andready for implementation- Coordinating board equipped with operational
infrastructure and functioned well
- Protocols and SOP of management operations
developed and adopted- 120 farmers of 12 villages in 2 main districts
engaged in implementation of livelihood activities- 1 FGD held in year 1- Sustainable forest functions on core area welldefined- Data on reserve reviewed and updated in year 1- Database system installed and operational since
year 1- ISMP formulated in year 2- Consultation on ISMP with stakeholders at
provincial and district levels conducted in year 2- 1 national workshop organized and ISMP adopted
in year 2- MCB equipped with workplan and work facilities
since year 1
14

Consultation with authorities
Forestry Agency
annual reports
Forestry Agency
annual reports

Consultation, ISMP document
Field check
Protocols and SOP
document
Livelihood development
reportDiscussion report
Map, field check
NC’s report
NC’s report, field check
ISMP document
Consultation report
Workshop report
ISMP document

Assumptions
Provincial and district
governments provide strong
support implementation of
adopted ISMP

Provincial and District
governments support adoption of
formulated ISMP

Output 2:
Institutional capacity to manage
GSK BR strengthened- 6 staff of EA and CA trained on skills forbiosphere reserve management in years 1 and 2- Protocols of managements operations adopted inyear 2- SOP for management operations adopted in year2
- Suitable funding mechanism established in year 2

NC’s report
Training report
Protocols
document
SOP document
NC’s report

Output 3:
Support of stakeholders on
operational management of GSK
BR promoted- A series of dialogue on livelihood activities withlocal stakeholders conducted in year 1- 3 income generating activities identified anddemonstrated at 4 sites in years 1 - 3- 120 farmers of 12 villages in 2 districts trained on
livelihood activities in years 2-3- At least 40% of woman involved in the training- 3 technical manuals on livelihood developed anddisseminated in years 2-3- Legal framework for utilization of environmental
services developed in years 2-3- Campaign on GSK BR development launched inyear 315

NGO’s technical report
NGO’s technical report, fieldcheck
Training report
Technical manual
Policy document
Campaign materials

2.2. Objectives
2.2.1. Development objective and impact indicators
Development objective:
To contribute to realizing the management objectives and basic functions of GSK-BR
Impact Indicators:
3-4 years after project completion:- Adopted ISMP fully used to guide management operations- Deforestation and forest degradation reduced from 2,800 ha in 2013 to 0 ha in 2023
- At least 20 villages in 2 main districts supported management operations
2.2.2. Specific objective and outcome indicators
Specific objective:
To promote an effective implementation of sustainable management and conservation of GSK-BR
Outcome Indicators:
By end of year 3:- A legitimate ISMP disseminated, adopted and ready for implementation- Coordinating board equipped with operational infrastructure and functioned well
- Protocols and SOP of management operations developed and adopted- 120 farmers of 12 villages in 2 main districts engaged in implementation of livelihood activities

16

PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT INTERVENTIONS
3.1. Outputs and activities
3.1.1. Outputs
Output 1:

Planning framework of GSK-BR enhanced

Output 2:

Institutional capacity to manage GSK-BR strengthened

Output 3:

Support of stakeholders on operational management of GSK-BR promoted

3.1.2. Activities
Output 1.
Activity 1.1

To organize one focus group discussion on planning framework of GSK-BR
involving concerned authorities

Activity 1.2

To affirm sustainable forest functions on GSK-BR involving forestry authorities
and main stakeholders

Activity 1.3

To review and update bio-physical and socio-economic data on biospherereserve

Activity 1.4

To install and operate a data-base system for the biosphere reserve

Activity 1.5

To formulate ISMP with the assistance of competent professionals

Activity 1.6

To conduct consultation with general stakeholders on draft ISMP

Activity 1.7

To organize one national workshop on GSK-BR biosphere management status
and adoption of ISMP

Notes:
Activity 1.2 corresponds to the problem on “not well-defined forest functions on GSK-BR”; Activities
1.3 and 1.4 correspond to the problem on “lack of updated reliable data”; Activities 1.5 through 1.7
are consistent with the problem on “unavailable ISMP”
Output 2
Activity 2.1

To make existing management coordinating board functioning well throughdevelopment of an operational plan and provision of needed resources

Activity 2.2

To train sufficient number of professional on biosphere management related
skillsActivity 2.3

To formulate and adopt protocols on biosphere management operations

Activity 2.4

To develop standard operating procedures (SOP) for conduct of management
operations by different stakeholders

Activity 2.5

To establish a suitable funding mechanism to support continued management
operations of GSK-BR

Notes:
Activities 2.3 and 2.4 correspond to the problem on “rules of conduct on management
operations not yet defined”

17Output 3
Activity 3.1

To conduct a series of dialogue with stakeholders at sub-district and village
levels on potential benefits of biosphere reserve development

Activity 3.2

To identify sustainable income generating activities in close consultation withlocal communities at selected sites

Activity 3.3

To establish demonstration plots for selected income generating activities atselected suitable sites

Activity 3.4

To train villagers on practical skills for implementing selected income generating
activities and for developing CSE of NTFPs.

Activity 3.5

To develop and disseminate technical manuals on development of selected
income generating activities

Activity 3.6

To initiate development of legal framework for the utilization of environmental
services by private sector in close consultation with main stakeholders

Activity 3.7

To launch campaign on GSK-BR development through dialogue, production anddissemination of attractive and easy-to-read materials

Notes:
Activities 3.1 thru 3.5 deal with development of incentives for local communities corresponding to
the problem on “incentives for local communities not identified and developed”
A national policy that specifically governs on PES is currently not available. The utilization ofenvironmental services within the conservation area is only regulated through the Government Regulation,
PP No. 28/2011 and Forestry Ministerial decree, P. 20/2012. Among the important relevant provisions of PP
No. 28/2011 are:•Any designated conservation areas can be utilized for purposes of research and education as well
as for production of environmental services including carbon, water, energy and biodiversity (Section
32)•

Utilization of conservation areas may be performed in collaboration with private sector, internationalorganizations and other eligible parties (Section 43)•

Utilization of conservation areas requires a license to be issued by the Ministry of Forestry (Section
38)•

Any licensed users of conservation areas must pay for charges of the environmental services they
produce at the rate to be determined by the government

The proposed Activity 3.6 is intended to improve operationalization of the existing framework on theutilization of environmental services within the biosphere covering, among others, carbon, water, energy,
biodiversity and tourism; and including the requirements and procedures for licensing the utilization andtrading of environmental services in general, not only for carbon. This project argues that the manner in which
relevant legal framework is formulated may favorably or adversely affect interest of investors in tapping ofenvironmental services potential of GSK-BR.

18

3.2. Implementation approaches and methods
This project will be implemented through several approaches and methods below:•

To organize consultation and focus group discussions to facilitate formulation of integrated strategic
management plan, legal framework for utilization of environmental services, protocols and SOP ofmanagement operations and various forms of public campaign, including mechanism for funding andstakeholders involvement.

•

To organize training to improve capacity (skills and knowledge) of staffs and personnel of different
such institutions as coordinating board, local research institutions, local governments (BAPPEDA)
and other local forestry institutions responsible for and involved in the management operations of
GSK-BR.

•

To organize capacity building and awareness raising to improve knowledge and skills of local
communities and indigenous people on the overall objective of biosphere reserve, the importance ofconserving natural resources and sustainable income generating activities.
-

Specific training for income generation activities will be organized for local communities andindigenous people, such as for management of community small-scale enterprises (CSE), nontimber forest products and fisheries.

-

Awareness raising on the importance of maintaining ecosystem function will be conducted
through information dissemination to various communities using printed materials, radio andtalkshow within the province of Riau.

•

To organize discussion to formulate funding mechanism for support of long term management of
GSK-BR; availability of funding is prerequisite to ensuring sustainability of project activities initiatedunder the project.

•

To enhance capacity of institutions for managing GSK-BR by reviewing existing rules and regulations
in view of their enhancement.

•

To up-date the previously collected data and information on existing natural resources including
biological diversity in previously defined areas and zone; updated data and information are importantto properly set-up the management plan, conservation strategies for biological component andoperational activities, including for the establishment of database management system.

•

To identify adequate monitoring method for project implementation and sustainability measures byorganizing a preparatory meeting prior to implementation of the project activities.

•

To distribute and disseminate project results and findings to all beneficiaries through various means,during the implementation of the project and after its completion.

19

3.3. Workplan
Output/activities

Output 1
Activity 1.1: To organize one focus
group discussion on planning
framework of GSK‐BR involving
concerned authorities
Activity 1.2: To affirm sustainable
forest functions on GSK BR involving
forestry authorities and mainstakeholders
Activity 1.3: To review and updatebio‐physical and socio‐ economic
data on biosphere reserve
Activity 1.4: To install and operate adata‐base system for the biospherereserve
Activity 1.5: To formulate ISMP withtheassistanceof competentprofessionals
Activity 1.6: To conduct consultation
with general stakeholders on draft
ISMP
Activity 1.7: To organize one national
workshop on GSK BR biospheremanagement status and adoption of
ISMP
Output 2
Activity 2.1: To make existing
management coordinating board
functioningwell
throughdevelopment of an operational planand provision of needed resources
Activity 2.2: To train sufficientnumber of professional on biospheremanagement related skills
Activity 2.3: To formulate and adopt
protocols on biosphere management
operations
Activity 2.4: To develop standard
operating procedures (SOP) for
conduct of management operations
by different
stakeholders
Activity 2.5: To establish a suitable
funding mechanism to support
continued management operationsof GSK BR

Resp.
Party

Phase I
Year 1Q1
Q2PC, PFA

V

PC, PFA,
KPH

V

FORDA, IIS

Q3

Q4

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

PC, NC
IC, NC, IIS

Phase II
Year 3

Year 2
Q1
Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

PC, PFAV

PC,
BBKSDA,
LEO

PC, NCPC,
BBKSDA,IIS,
SF,UN
PC, NC,BBKSDA,
IIS

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

PC, NC,BKSDA,IIS, SF,

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

PC, NC, IIS

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

20

Output/activities

Output 3
Activity 3.1: To conduct a series of
dialogue with stakeholders at sub‐district and village levels on
potential benefits of biospherereserve development
Activity 3.2: To identify sustainable
income generating activities in close
consultation with local communities
atselected sites
Activity
3.3:
To
establish
demonstration plots for selected
income generating activities atselected suitable sites
Activity 3.4: To train villagers onpractical skills for implementing
selected
incomegenerating
activities and for developing CSE of
NTFPs
Activity 3.5: To develop anddisseminate technical manuals on
development of selected income
generating activities
Activity
3.6:
To
initiatedevelopment of legal framework for
the utilization of environmental
services by private sector in close
consultation with mainstakeholders
Activity 3.7: To launch campaign on
GSK BR development throughdialogue,production
anddissemination of attractive andeasy‐
to‐read materials

Resp.
Party

Phase I
Year 1
Q1
Q2

Q3

Q4

PC, SF,
NGO

V

V

V

V

PC, SF,
NGO

V

V

V

V

V

V

FORDA, SF,
NGO

PC, SF,
NGO

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

FORDA, SF,
NC

PC, SF, NC,
IC
PC, CS,SF,BBKSDA,NGO

Phase II
Year 3

Year 2
Q1
Q2

V

Notes:BBKSDA = Balai Konservasi Sumberdaya Alam (Natural Resources Conservation Agency)
FORDA = Forestry Research Development and Inovation Agency (FRDC)
CS= Campaigning SpecialistNC= National Consultant
IC= International Consultant
PFA= Provincial Forestry Agency
NGO= Non‐Governmental OrganizationSF= Sinarmas Forestry
IIS= Indonesian Institute of ScienceIC= International Consultant
PC= Project Coordinator
LEO= Local Event OrganizerUN= University

21

Q3

Q4

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

Review of workplan on Activities 1.5 - 1.7
Under Activity 1.5 draft ISMP will be completed. This draft needs to be improved through consultation
with stakeholders at the district and provincial levels for which 3 workshops need to be organized. The
workshops are to be completed within one year time under Activity 1.6. Improved draft that accomodates
comments (inputs) of the district and provincial workshops will be tabled at a national workshop to beorganized under Activity 1.7. The national workshop will be attended by district, province and national
authorities as well as other main stakeholders to final discuss improved draft ISMP and endorse its adoption.
Involvement of national authorities including officials of Indonesia MAB Programme is a matter of necessity
considering the fact that management of the biosphere reserve is the responsibility of both the Ministry ofEnvironment and Forestry and MAB Programme. Allocating three quarters for consultation and adoption of
ISMP under Activities 1.6 and 1.7 is thought to be reasionable.

223.4. Budget-Phase I
3.4.1. Master budget schedule

Output/Activity
1
Output 1 : Planning
framework GSKBRActivity 1.1.: Toorganitation focus group
discussion on Planning
framework GSKBR
involving concerned
authorities
Sub-total Activity 1.1
Activity 1.2: To affirm
sustainable forest
function on GSKBR
involving forestry
authorities and mainstakeholders

BudgetQuarter compon
ent2
3
Q1-Q2,Y1

Q1-Q4,
Y1

Sub-total Activity 1.2
Activity 1.3: To review
and update biophysicalQ1-Q4,and socio-economic data Y1
on bios phere reserve
Sub-total Activity 1.3
Activity 1.4: To Installand operate a database Q3-Q4,
system for the bios phare Y1
reserve
Q1-Q4,
Y2

InputsUnit

4

5

Quantity
ITTO
GOI
Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2
6
7
9
10

Total

Unit Cost

ITTO Contribution

12

Year 1
13

Year 2
14

Total
16

Gol Contribution (Executing+Sinar Mas
Foresty)
Year 1
Year 2
Total
17
18
20

Grand
Total
21

15
31.2
33
51

a
b
c
d

National Consultant (NC) MM
DSA, NC
MD
Local Transport
TD
Consumable
Package

2.00
5.00
0.50

-

2.00
25.00
30.00
0.50

-

4.00
30.00
30.00
1.00

1,300.00
70.00
60.00
1,000.00

2,600.00
350.00500.00-2,600.00
350.00500.002,600.00
1,750.00
1,800.00
500.00-2,600.00
1,750.00
1,800.00
500.005,200.00
2,100.00
1,800.00
1,000.00

15
31.2
1.10
56
51
33
51

a
b
c
d
e
f
g

5.00
10.00
2.00
1.00

4.00
- 40.00- 225.00
2.00
1.00- 50.00
2.00

-

9.00
50.00
225.00
2.00
3.00
50.00
3.00

1,200.00
70.00
10.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
800.001,500.00

3,450.00
6,000.00
700.004,000.00
1,500.00-

3,450.00
6,000.00
700.004,000.00
1,500.00

6,650.00
4,800.00
2,800.00
2,250.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
40,000.00
3,000.00-

6,650.00
4,800.00
2,800.00
2,250.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
40,000.00
3,000.00

10,100.00
10,800.00
3,500.00
2,250.00
2,000.00
6,000.00
40,000.00
4,500.00

61hNational Consultant (NC) MM
DSA, NC
MD
LaborerMD
Satellite imagery
Scane
Consumable
Package
Local transport
Month
Stakeholder
Meeting
consultation
Miscellaneous, meeting Paclage

2.00

-

3.00

-

5.00

900.00

15
31.2
33
51
61

a
b
c
d
e

National Consultant (NC) MM
DSA, NC
MD
Local transport
TD
Consunable
Paclage
Miscellaneous, meeting Paclage

6.00
10.00
1.00
4.00

-

6.00
30.00
50.00
-

-

12.00
40.00
50.00
1.00
4.00

1,200.00
70.00
50.00
500.00300.00

14
41

a
b

MM
Set

5.00
1.00

6.00
-

2.00
2.00

4.00
-

17.00
3.00

800.001,500.00

4,800.00-

1,800.00
14,000.00
7,200.00
700.00500.001,200.00
9,600.00
8,800.00
1,500.00

2,700.00
59,550.00
7,200.00
2,100.00
2,500.00
11,800.00
1,600.00
3,000.00

3,200.00-

2,700.00
59,550.00
7,200.00
2,100.00
2,500.00
11,800.00
4,800.00
3,000.00

4,500.00
73,550.00
14,400.00
2,800.00
2,500.00
500.001,200.00
21,400.00
13,600.00
4,500.00

54
17
61

c
d
e

National Expert (NE)
PC/Notebook andFacitilies
Provider Rental
Operator
Miscellaneous, meeting

1,800.00
14,000.00
7,200.00
700.00500.001,200.00
9,600.00
4,000.00
1,500.00

Package
MM
Paclage

0.50
-

1.00
1.00

1.00

12.00
1.00

1.50
12.00
3.00

900.00300.00200.00450.00-900.00200.001,350.00
200.00200.003,600.00
200.003,600.00
400.001,350.00
3,600.00
600.005,950.00

5,900.00

11,850.00

4,800.00

7,000.00

11,800.00

23,650.00

Sub-total Activity 1.4

23BudgetQuarter compon
ent
1
2
3
Activity 1.5.: To
15aformulate ISMP with the Q1-Q2, 31.2bassistance of competent Y2
32.1
cprofessionals
33
d
61
e
Sub-total Activity 1.5
Activity 1.6: To conduct Q3-Q4, 21
aconsultation with general Y2
61b
stakeholders on draft
ISMP
Sub-total Activity 1.6
Activity 1.7: To organize Q4,22aone national workshop
Y261bon GSK BR biosphere62cmanagement status
and adoption of ISMP
Sub-total Activity 1.7
Total Output 1
Output 2: Institutional
capacity to manage GSK
BR strengthened
Activity 2.1: To makeQ3-Q4, 15aexisting management
Y1
31.2
b
coordinating board51cfunctioning well through Q3-Q4, 19ddevelopment of anY261e
operational plan and68
fprovision of needed
resources
Sub-total Activity 2.1
Activity 2.2: To train
Q3-Q4, 23asufficient number ofY161bprofessional on
biosphere management Q3-Q4,
relatedY2
skillsSub-total Activity 2.2.
Output/Activity

InputsUnit

45National Consultant (NC) MM
DSA, NC
MD
Airticket
Trip
Local TransportTD
Miscellaneous, meeting Package

Quantity
ITTO
GOI
Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2
6
7
9
10
6.00
- 10.00- 40.00
3.00- 50.00
1.00
1.00

ITTO Contribution

Total

Unit Cost

6.00
50.00
3.00
50.00
2.00

12
1,000.00
70.00
250.0050.00
300.00Year 1
13

-

-

-

-

33,000.00 13,650.00

46,650.00

82,800.00

12,600.00

95,400.00 142,050.00

2,800.00
420.003,000.00-

2,100.00
350.003,000.00-

4,900.00
770.006,000.00-

1,400.00
1,750.00
3,000.00
6,000.00
2,400.00
800.001,400.00
1,750.00
3,000.00
6,000.00
2,400.00
800.002,800.00
3,500.00
6,000.00
12,000.00
4,800.00
1,600.00

7,700.00
4,270.00
12,000.00
12,000.00
4,800.00
1,600.00

6,220.00 5,450.00
6,000.00 12,000.00-

11,670.00
18,000.00-

15,350.00
600.0015,350.00
600.0030,700.00
1,200.00

42,370.00
18,000.00
1,200.00

6,000.00 12,000.00

18,000.00

600.00600.001,200.00

19,200.00

Subcontract- No. 1, UN
Miscellaneous, meeting

Event
Package

-

-

-

-

-

-

Subcontract- No. 2, LEO
Miscellaneous, meeting
Printing of ISMP
document

Contract
Package
Copy

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4.00
6.00
6.00
-

3.00
5.00
6.00
-

2.00
25.00
6.00
12.00
4.00
4.00

2.00
25.00
6.00
12.00
4.00
4.00

11.00
61.00
24.00
24.00
8.00
8.00

700.0070.00
500.00500.00600.00200.00Sub contract - No. 3, UN Contract
Miscellaneous, meeting Meeting

1.00
-

2.00
-

2.00

2.00

3.00
4.00

6,000.00
300.00

24

Grand
Total

Year 2146,000.00
700.00750.00300.007,750.00--

National Consultant (NC) MM
DSA, NC
MD
Consumable
Package
MCB Secretary
Package
Miscellaneous, meeting Package
MCB Quarterly meeting Month

Gol Contribution (Executing+Sinar Mas
Foresty)
Total
Year 1
Year 2
Total
16
17
18
20
6,000.00
700.002,800.00
2,800.00
750.002,500.00
2,500.00
300.00300.00300.007,750.00
5,600.00
5,600.00-

21
6,000.00
3,500.00
750.002,500.00
600.0013,350.00-

BudgetQuarter compon
ent
1
2
3
Activity 2.3: To formulate
15a
and adopt protocols on Q3-Q4, 31.2
bbiosphereY1
33cmanagement operations Q3-Q4, 61dY2Sub-total Activity 2.3
Activity 2.4: To develop
15
astandard operating
Q1-Q4, 31.2bprocedures (SOP) forY2
33c
conduct of management
61doperations by different
stakeholders
Sub-total Activity 2.4
Activity 2.5: To establish
15aa suitable funding
Q1-Q4, 31.2bmechanism to support
Y2
33ccontinued management
61doperations of GSK BR
Sub-total Activity 2.5
Total Output 2
Output 3: Support of
stakeholders on
operational
management of GSK BR
promoted
Activity 3.1: To conduct a Q1-Q4, 24
aseries of dialogue withY1
61b
stakeholders at sub‐district and village levels
on potential benefits ofbiosphere
Sub-total Activity 3.1
Activity 3.2: To identify
Q1-Q4,asustainable income
Y1
generating activities inclose consultation withlocal communities atselected sites
Sub-total Activity 3.2
Output/Activity

InputsUnit

45National Consultant (NC) MM
DSA, NC
MD
Local transportTD
Miscellaneous, meeting Meeting

Quantity
ITTO
GOI
Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2
6
7
9
10
2.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
5.00
5.00 25.00 25.00- 30.00 30.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00

Total

Unit Cost

8.00
60.00
60.00
4.00

12
1,000.00
70.00
50.00
300.00Year 113
2,000.00
350.00300.00Year 2144,000.00
350.00300.00

Gol Contribution (Executing+Sinar Mas
Foresty)
Total
Year 1
Year 2
Total
16
17
18
20
6,000.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
700.001,750.00
1,750.00
3,500.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
3,000.00
600.00300.00300.00600.00ITTO Contribution

Grand
Total
21
8,000.00
4,200.00
3,000.00
1,200.00

National Consultant (NC) MM
DSA,NC
MD
Local transportTD
Miscellaneous, meeting Meeting

-

1.00
5.00
-

-

40.00
45.00
2.00

1.00
45.00
45.00
2.00

700.0070.00
50.00
300.002,650.00-

4,650.00
700.00350.00-7,300.00
700.00350.00-4,550.00-

4,550.00
2,800.00
2,250.00
600.009,100.00
2,800.00
2,250.00
600.0016,400.00
700.003,150.00
2,250.00
600.00National Consultant (NC) MM
DSA, NC
MD
Local transportTD
Miscellaneous, meeting Meeting

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,050.00-

1,050.00--

5,650.00-

5,650.00-

6,700.00-

14,870.00 23,150.00

38,020.00

20,500.00

26,150.00

46,650.00

84,670.00

Subcontract- No. 4, NGO Site
Miscellaneous, meeting Meeting

Accomplished trough
Act.
3.1

15.00
3.00

-

1.00

-

15.00
4.00

1,200.00
300.0018,000.00
900.00-18,000.00
900.00300.00-300.0018,000.00
1,200.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

18,900.00--

18,900.00-

300.00--300.00-19,200.00
-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

25

Output/Activity
1
Activity 3.3: To establish
demonstration plots forselected income
generating activities atselected suitable sites
Sub-total Activity 3.3
Activity 3.4: To train
villagers on practicalskills for implementing
selected income
generating activities andfor developing
CSE of NTFPs
Sub-total Activity 3.4
Activity 3.5: To develop
and disseminate
technical manuals on
development of selected
income generating
activities
Sub-total Activity 3.5
Activity 3.6: To initiate
development of legal
framework for theutilization ofenvironmental services
by private sector in close
consultation with mainstakeholders
Sub-total Activity 3.6
Activity 3.7: To launch
campaign on GSK BR
development throughdialogue, production anddissemination of
attractive andeasy‐to‐read materials

Sub-total Activity 3.7
Total Output 3
Total Project cost

BudgetQuarter compon
ent2
3
Q3-Q4, 25
a
Y1
61
b

InputsUnit

4
5
Subcontract- No. 5, NGO Contract
Miscellaneous, meeting Meeting

Quantity
ITTO
GOI
Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2
6
7
9
10
1.00
2.00
1.00
-

-

Year 2145,000.00
300.00

Gol Contribution (Executing+Sinar Mas
Foresty)
Total
Year 1
Year 2
Total
16
17
18
20
5,000.00- 10,000.00 10,000.00
300.00-21
15,000.00
300.00ITTO Contribution

Total

Unit Cost

3.00
1.00

12
5,000.00
300.00

Q1-Q4,
Y2

Year 1
13

Grand
Total

Q1-Q4,
Y2

26
61

a
b

Subcontract- No. 6, NGO Session
Miscellaneous, meeting Meeting

-

1.00
-

-

3.00
2.00

4.00
2.00

3,000.00
300.00-5,300.00
3,000.00-

5,300.00
3,000.00--

10,000.00
9,000.00
600.0010,000.00
9,000.00
600.0015,300.00
12,000.00
600.00Q3-Q4,
Y2

15
31.2
33
61
62

a
b
c
d
e

National Consultant (NC) MM
DSA, NC
MD
Localt transportTD
Miscellaneous, meeting Meeting
Printing
Copy

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3,000.00-

3,000.00--

9,600.00-

9,600.00-

12,600.00-

Q3-Q4,
Y2

14
31.1
32.1
33
61

a
b
c
d
e

National Expert (NE)
DSA, NE
Air ticket
Local Transport
Miscellaneous, meeting

MM
MD
Trip
TD
Meeting

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Q2-Q4,
Y2

16
31.4
51
61
62
63
64

a
b
c
d
e
f
g

MM
MD
Year
Meeting
Copy
SessionSession

-

1.00
5.00
1.00
-

-

-

1.00
5.00
1.00
-

1,500.00
70.00
500.00--1,500.00
350.00500.00-1,500.00
350.00500.00----1,500.00
350.00500.00-65hCampaign specialist, CS
DSA,CS
Consumables
Miscellaneous, meeting
Printing of materials
Tv,talkshow
National and Regional
dialogue
Domestic participants

Event

-

-

-

-

-

-

- 2,350.00
2,350.00
18,900.00 10,650.00 29,550.00
66,770.00 47,450.00 114,220.00

300.00103,600.00

26

2,350.00
19,600.00 19,900.00 49,450.00
58,350.00 161,950.00 276,170.00

Output/Activity
1
Non acivity based

BudgetQuarter compon
ent
2
3
11
12
13
19
31.5
32.1
33
43
44
45
46
47
42
41
52
53

Total non-activity based
Grand Total Project Cost
ITTO Monitoring andReview
ITTO Programme
SupportNational Management
Cost
Grand Total Project Cost

66
67
62

Inputs4
Key personnel
a Project Coordinatorb Project Secretaryc Techniciansd Field Supervisor
Duty travel
e DSA
f Domestic Air ticket
g Local transport
Capital Items
h Operational Vehicle
i Speed Boatj Camera SLR
k In focus
Office operationl Space 40 M2
m Furnituren PC/Notebook
Consumableso Stationaries
p Utilities
Miscellaneousq PSC Meetingr Financial Audits Report Printing

Unit
5

Quantity
ITTO
GOI
Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2
6
7
9
10

MM
MM
MM
MM

12.00
12.00
12.00
-

12.00
12.00
12.00
-

12.00

12.00

Trip
MD
Trip

12.00
3.00
3.00

12.00
3.00
3.00

16.00
4.00
4.00

16.00
4.00
4.00

Unit
Unit
Set
Set

-

-

1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00

-

Month
Set
Unit

2.00

-

12.00
1.00
1.00

12.00
-

Month
Month

8.00
8.00

8.00
8.00

4.00
4.00

4.00
4.00

Meeting
Year
copy

1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
- 100.00- 100.00

Total

Unit Cost
12

24.00 1,500.00
24.00
500.0024.00
800.0024.00
500.00
56.00
70.00
14.00
250.0014.00
50.00
1.00 25,000.00
1.00 4,500.00
2.00 2,500.00
1.00 1,000.00
24.00
600.001.00 5,000.00
3.00
600.0024.00
400.0024.00
250.002.00 2,000.00
2.00 4,000.00
200.0015.00

Gol Contribution (Executing+Sinar Mas
Foresty)
Year 1
Year 2
Total
17
18
20

ITTO Contribution
Year 1
13

Year 2
14

Total
16

18,000.00 18,000.00 36,000.00
6,000.00 6,000.00 12,000.00
9,600.00 9,600.00 19,200.00
840.00840.001,680.00
750.00750.001,500.00
150.00150.00300.001,200.00
1,200.00
3,200.00 3,200.00
6,400.00
2,000.00 2,000.00
4,000.00
2,000.00 2,000.00
4,000.00
4,000.00 4,000.00
8,000.00- 1,500.00
1,500.00
47,740.00 48,040.00 95,780.00
114,510.00 95,490.00 210,000.00

21- 36,000.00- 12,000.00- 19,200.00
6,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00
1,120.00
2,240.00
3,920.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
3,500.00
200.00400.00700.00- 25,000.00 25,000.00
4,500.00
4,500.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
7,200.00 14,400.00 14,400.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
600.001,800.00
1,600.00
3,200.00
9,600.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
6,000.00
4,000.00
8,000.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
3,000.00
19,620.00 78,840.00 174,620.00
77,970.00 240,790.00 450,790.00

13,214.29-

13,214.29

26,785.71-

26,785.71-

1,224.00

1,224.00

250,000.00

27

6,000.00
1,120.00
1,000.00
200.0025,000.00
4,500.00
5,000.00
1,000.00
7,200.00
5,000.00
600.001,600.00
1,000.00
59,220.00
162,820.00

Grand
Total

242,014.00 492,014.00

3.4.2. Consolidated yearly budget
Category
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
19
20

30

21
22
23
24
25
26
29
31

32

40

49
50

60

70
80

100

33
39
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
51
52
53
54
55
59
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69

81
82
89

Description
Personnel
Project Coordinator
Project Secretary
Technicians
National Expert
National Consultant
Campaigning specialist
Operator
MCB Secretary
Field supervisor
Laborer
Sub Total
Sub Contract
Sub contract No. 1 UN
Sub contract No. 2 LEO
Sub contract No. 3, UN
Sub contract No. 4, NGO
Sub contract No. 5, NGO
Sun contract No. 6, NGO
Sub Total
Duty Travel
Daily Subsistance Allowance
31.1 DSA National Expert
31.2 DSA National Consultant
31.3 DSA Campaining Specialist
31.4 DSA PMU
Air Ticket
32.1 Domestic Air Ticket
Local Transport
Sub Total
Capital Item
Personal computer/Notebook
Furniture
VehicleSpeed Boat
Camera SLR
In-focusSpace 40m2
Sub Total
Consummable item
Consumable
Stationary
Utilities
Provider rental
Satelite imagery
Sub Total
Miscelaneous
Meeting
Printing
TV Talkshow
National and Regional Dialog
Domestic participant
PSC Meeting
Financial Audit
MCB Quarterly meeting
Sub Total
Total Project Cost
National Management Cost
Project Monitoring and administration
ITTO monitoring and Review
ITTO Programme support
Total Project Monitoring and Administration
GRANT TOTAL

Total

Year 1

Year 236,000.00
12,000.00
19,200.00
13,600.00
52,800.00
1,500.00
3,600.00
12,000.00
12,000.00
2,250.00
164,950.00
18,000.00
18,000.00
15,000.00
12,000.00
63,000.00

18,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
5,600.00
37,600.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
2,250.00
91,050.00

18,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
8,000.00
15,200.00
1,500.00
3,600.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
73,900.00

6,000.00
18,000.00
24,000.00

12,000.00
15,000.00
12,000.00
39,000.00

23,520.00
350.003,920.00
4,250.00
52,750.00
84,790.00

12,670.00
1,960.00
1,750.00
46,150.00
62,530.00

10,850.00
350.001,960.00
2,500.00
6,600.00
22,260.00

6,300.00
5,000.00
25,000.00
4,500.00
5,000.00
1,000.00
14,400.00
61,200.00

6,300.00
5,000.00
25,000.00
4,500.00
5,000.00
1,000.00
7,200.00
54,000.00

7,200.00
7,200.00

20,000.00
9,600.00
6,000.00
1,350.00
2,000.00
38,950.00

13,500.00
4,800.00
3,000.00
450.002,000.00
23,750.00

6,500.00
4,800.00
3,000.00
900.0015,200.00

21,300.00
3,000.00
4,000.00
8,000.00
1,600.00
37,900.00
450,790.00
1,224.00

15,200.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
800.0022,000.00
277,330.00

6,100.00
3,000.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
800.0015,900.00
173,460.00

13,214
26,78640,000.00
492,014.00

28

3.4.3. ITTO yearly budget
Category
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
29
30
31

32
33
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
80
81
82
89
100

Description
Personnel
Project Coordinator
Project Secretary
Technicians
National Expert
National Consultant
Campaigning specialist
Operator
MCB Secretary
Field supervisor
Laborer
Sub Total
Sub Contract
Sub contract No. 1 UN
Sub contract No. 2 LEO
Sub contract No. 3, UN
Sub contract No. 4, NGO
Sub contract No. 5, NGO
Sun contract No. 6, NGO
Sub Total
Duty Travel
Daily Subsistance Allowance
31.1 DSA National Expert
31.2 DSA National Consultant
31.3 DSA Campaining Specialist
31.4 DSA PMU
Air Ticket
32.1 Domestic Air Ticket
Local Transport
Sub Total
Capital Item
Personal computer/Notebook
Furniture
VehicleSpeed Boat
Camera SLR
In-focusSpace 40m2
Sub Total
Consummable item
Consumable
Stationary
Utilities
Provider rental
Satelite imagery
Sub Total
Miscelaneous
Meeting
Printing
TV Talkshow
National and Regional Dialog
Domestic participant
PSC Meeting
Financial Audit
MCB Quarterly meeting
Sub Total
Total Project Cost
National Management Cost
Project Monitoring and administration
ITTO monitoring and Review
ITTO Programme support (total project cost+81)x12%
Total Project Monitoring and Administration
GRANT TOTAL

Total

Year 1

Year 236,000.00
12,000.00
19,200.00
8,800.00
33,400.00
1,500.00
110,900.00
18,000.00
18,000.00
5,000.00
3,000.00
44,000.00

18,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
4,000.00
20,600.00
58,200.00

18,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
4,800.00
12,800.00
1,500.00
52,700.00

6,000.00
18,000.00
24,000.00

12,000.00
5,000.00
3,000.00
20,000.00

4,270.00
350.001,680.00

2,520.00
840.001,750.00
350.00840.002,250.00
300.008,850.00

750.00150.004,260.00

1,500.00
150.004,590.00

2,700.00
2,700.00

2,700.00
2,700.00-

11,500.00
6,400.00
4,000.00
1,350.00
23,250.00

8,000.00
3,200.00
2,000.00
450.0013,650.00

3,500.00
3,200.00
2,000.00
900.009,600.00

6,800.00
5,700.00
1,100.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
4,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
8,000.00
4,000.00
4,000.00
20,300.00
11,700.00
8,600.00
210,000.00
114,510.00
95,490.00
See Executing agency budget
13,214
26,78640,000250,000

29

3.4.4. Sinarmas Forestry & Partners yearly budget
Category
10
13
14
15
17
18
19
19
20
21
22
25
26
29
30
31

32
33
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
47
49
50
51
55
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
68
69
70
80
81
82
89
100

Description
Personnel
Technicians
National Expert
National Consultant
Operator
MCB Secretary
Field supervisor
Laborer
Sub Total
Sub Contract
Sub contract No. 1 UN
Sub contract No. 2 LEO
Sub contract No. 5, NGO
Sun contract No. 6, NGO
Sub Total
Duty Travel
Daily Subsistance Allowance
31.1 DSA National Expert
31.2 DSA National Consultant
31.4 DSA PMU
Air Ticket
32.1 Domestic Air Ticket
Local Transport
Sub Total
Capital Item
Personal computer/Notebook
VehicleSpeed Boat
Camera SLR
In-focusSpace 40m2
Sub Total
Consummable item
Consumable
Satelite imagery
Sub Total
Miscelaneous
Meeting
Printing
TV Talkshow
National and Regional Dialog
Domestic participant
MCB Quarterly meeting
Sub Total
Total Project Cost
National Management Cost
Project Monitoring and administration
ITTO monitoring and Review
ITTO Programme support
Total Project Monitoring and Administration
GRANT TOTAL

Total

Year 1

Year 24,800.00
19,400.00
3,600.00
12,000.00
12,000.00
2,250.00
54,050.00
10,000.00
9,000.00
19,000.00

1,600.00
17,000.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
2,250.00
32,850.00

3,200.00
2,400.00
3,600.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
21,200.00-

10,000.00
9,000.00
19,000.00

19,250.00
2,240.00

10,150.00
1,120.00

9,100.00
1,120.00

2,000.00
52,450.00
75,940.00

1,000.00
46,000.00
58,270.00

1,000.00
6,450.00
17,670.00

3,600.00
25,000.00
4,500.00
5,000.00
1,000.00
14,400.00
53,500.00

3,600.00
25,000.00
4,500.00
5,000.00
1,000.00
7,200.00
46,300.00

7,200.00
7,200.00

8,500.00
2,000.00
10,500.00

5,500.00
2,000.00
7,500.00

3,000.00
3,000.00

14,500.00
9,500.00
5,000.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
1,600.00
800.00800.0017,600.00
10,300.00
7,300.00
230,590.00 155,220.00 75,370.00
See Executing agency budget
230,590.00

30

3.4.5 Executing Agency yearly budget (GoI)

Category
10
13
14
19
20
29
30
39
40
42
49
50
52
53
59
60
69
70
80
81
82
89

Description

Personnel
Technicians
National Expert
Sub Total
Sub Contract
Sub Total
Duty Travel
Sub Total
Capital Item
Furniture
Sub Total
Consummable item
Stationary
Utilities
Sub Total
Miscelaneous
Sub Total
Total project cost
National Management Cost
Project Monitoring and administration
ITTO monitoring and Review
ITTO Programme support
Total Project Monitoring and Administration
GRANT TOTAL

31

Total

Year 1

Year 2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

5,000.00
5,000.00

5,000.00
5,000.00-

3,200.00
2,000.00
5,200.00

1,600.00
1,000.00
2,600.00

1,600.00
1,000.00
2,600.00

10,200.00
1,224.00

7,600.00

2,600.00

11,424.00

3.5 Budget-Phase II
3.5.1. Master budget schedule

Output/Activity

Quarter

Budgetcomponent12

3

Quantity
Inputs

Unit

4

5

ITTO

GOI

Total

Year 3

Year 3

7

10

Unit Cost
12

ITTO Contribution

Gol Contribution(Executing+Sinar Mas
Foresty)

Year 3Total

Year 3

Total

14

16

18

20

Grand Total
21

Output 1 : Planning framework
GSKBR
Activity 1.1.: To organitation focus
group discussion on Planning
framework GSKBR involving concerned
authorities

15
31.2
33
51

a
b
c
d

National Consultant (NC)
DSA, NC
Local Transport
Consumable

MM
MD
TD
Package

-

-

-

-

15
31.2
1.10
56
51
33
51
61

a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h

National Consultant (NC)
DSA, NC
LaborerSatellite imagery
Consumable
Local transport
Stakeholder consultation
Miscellaneous, meeting

MM
MD
MD
Scane
PackageMonth
Meeting
Paclage

-

-

-

-

15
31.2
33
51
61

a
b
c
d
e

National Consultant (NC)
DSA, NC
Local transport
Consunable
Miscellaneous, meeting

MM
MD
TD
Paclage
Paclage

-

-

-

-

14
41
54
17
61

a
b
c
d
e

National Expert (NE)
PC/Notebook and Facitilies
Provider Rental
Operator
Miscellaneous, meetingMM
Set
Package
MM
Paclage

7.00
1.00
1.00

4.00
12.00
1.00

11.00
1.00
12.00
2.00

800.001,500.00
900.00300.00200.00Sub-total Activity 1.1

Activity 1.2: To affirm sustainable
forest function on GSKBR involving
forestry authorities and mainstakeholders

Sub-total Activity 1.2
Activity 1.3: To review and update
biophysical and socio-economic dataon bios phere reserve
Sub-total Activity 1.3
Activity 1.4: To Install and operate a
database system for the bios pharereserve
Sub-total Activity 1.4

Q1-Q4,Y3

32

-

-

-

-

-

5,600.00
900.00200.006,700.00

5,600.00
900.00200.006,700.00

3,200.00
3,600.00
200.007,000.00

3,200.00
3,600.00
200.007,000.00

8,800.00
900.003,600.00
400.0013,700.00

Output/Activity
1
Activity 1.5.: To formulate ISMP
with the assistance ofcompetent professionals

Quarter2
Q1-Q4,Y3

Quantity

Budgetcomponent

Inputs

3

4

Unit

ITTO

GOI

Total

Year 3

Year 3
10

Unit Cost

Sub-total Activity 1.6
Activity 1.7: To organize one
national workshop on GSK BR
biosphere management status
and adoption of ISMP
Sub-total Activity 1.7
Total Output 1
Output 2: Institutional
capacity to manage GSK BR
strengthened
Activity 2.1: To make existing
management coordinatingboard functioning well throughdevelopment of an operational
plan and provision of needed
resources
Sub-total Activity 2.1
Activity 2.2: To train sufficientnumber of professional on
biosphere management related
skillsSub-total Activity 2.2.

Q1-Q4,Y3

Q1-Q4,Y3

Q1-Q4,Y3

Gol Contribution(Executing+Sinar Mas
Foresty)

Year 3Total

Year 3
18

Grand Total

Total

5

7

12

14

16

15
31.2
32.1
33
61

a
b
c
d
e

National Consultant (NC)
DSA, NC
Airticket
Local Transport
Miscellaneous, meeting

MM
MD
Trip
TD
Package

6.00
15.00
3.00
15.00
3.00

-

6.00
15.00
3.00
15.00
3.00

1,200.00
70.00
250.0050.00
300.007,200.00
1,050.00
750.00750.00900.0010,650.00

7,200.00
1,050.00
750.00750.00900.0010,650.00--

7,200.00
1,050.00
750.00750.00900.0010,650.00

21aSubcontract- No. 1, UN

Event

1.00

2.00

3.00

5,000.00

4,000.00

4,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

14,000.00

61bMiscellaneous, meeting

Package

3.00

1.00

4.00

300.00900.00900.00300.00300.001,200.00

22
61

a
b

Subcontract- No. 2, LEO
Miscellaneous, meeting

Contract
Package

1.00
3.00

0.50
1.00

1.50
4.00

6,000.00
300.004,900.00
6,000.00
900.004,900.00
6,000.00
900.0010,300.00
3,000.00
300.0010,300.00
3,000.00
300.0015,200.00
9,000.00
1,200.00

62c

Printing of ISMP document

Copy

4.00

150.00154.0025.00

Sub-total Activity 1.5
Activity 1.6: To conduct
consultation with general
stakeholders on draft ISMPITTO Contribution

20

21

100.00100.003,750.00

3,750.00

3,850.00

7,000.00
29,250.00

7,000.00
29,250.00

7,050.00
24,350.00

7,050.00
24,350.00

14,050.00
53,600.00

15
31.2
51
19
61
68

a
b
c
d
e
f

National Consultant (NC)
DSA, NC
Consumable
MCB Secretary
Miscellaneous, meeting
MCB Quarterly meeting

MM
MD
Package
Package
Package
Month

7.00
20.00
6.00
-

3.00
6.00
12.00
4.00
4.00

10.00
20.00
12.00
12.00
4.00
4.00

700.0070.00
500.00500.00600.00200.004,900.00
1,400.00
3,000.00
9,300.00

4,900.00
1,400.00
3,000.00
9,300.00

2,100.00
3,000.00
6,000.00
2,400.00
800.0014,300.00

2,100.00
3,000.00
6,000.00
2,400.00
800.0014,300.00

7,000.00
1,400.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
2,400.00
800.0023,600.00

23a

Sub contract - No. 3, UN

Contract

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

61

b

Miscellaneous, meeting

Meeting

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

33

Output/Activity
1
Activity 2.3: To formulate andadopt protocols on biospheremanagement operations
Sub-total Activity 2.3
Activity 2.4: To develop
standard operating procedures(SOP) for conduct ofmanagement operations bydifferent
stakeholders
Sub-total Activity 2.4
Activity 2.5: To establish asuitable funding mechanism tosupport continued
management
operations of GSK BR
Sub-total Activity 2.5
Total Output 2
Output 3: Support of
stakeholders on operational
management of GSK BR
promoted
Activity 3.1: To conduct a seriesof dialogue with stakeholders
at sub‐district and village levels
on potential benefits ofbiosphere
Sub-total Activity 3.1
Activity 3.2: To identify
sustainable income generating
activities in close consultation
with local communities atselected sites
Sub-total Activity 3.2

Quarter2
Q1-Q2,Y3

Q1-Q4,Y3

Q1-Q4,Y3

Quantity

Budgetcomponent

Inputs

3

4

Unit
5

ITTO

GOI

Total

Year 3

Year 3

7

10

Unit Cost

ITTO Contribution

Gol Contribution(Executing+Sinar Mas
Foresty)

Year 3Total

Year 3

Total

Grand Total

12

14

16

18

20

21

15
31.2
33
61

a
b
c
d

National Consultant (NC)
DSA, NC
Local transport
Miscellaneous, meeting

MM
MD
TD
Meeting

2.00
5.00
5.00
1.00

-

2.00
5.00
5.00
1.00

1,200.00
70.00
50.00
300.00

15
31.2
33

a
b
c

National Consultant (NC)
DSA,NC
Local transport

MM
MD
TD

6.00
20.00
-

20.00

6.00
20.00
20.00

1,200.00
70.00
50.00

2,400.00
350.00250.00300.003,300.00
7,200.00
1,400.00-

2,400.00
350.00250.00300.003,300.00
7,200.00
1,400.00-

1,000.00

1,000.00

2,400.00
350.00250.00300.003,300.00
7,200.00
1,400.00
1,000.00

61d

Miscellaneous, meeting

Meeting

2.00

2.00

4.00

300.00600.00600.00600.00600.001,200.00

15
31.2
33

a
b
c

National Consultant (NC)
DSA, NC
Local transport

MM
MD
TD

6.00
25.00
-

20.00

6.00
25.00
30.00

1,000.00
70.00
50.00

9,200.00
6,000.00
1,750.00-

9,200.00
6,000.00
1,750.00-

1,600.00
1,000.00

1,600.00
1,000.00

10,800.00
6,000.00
1,750.00
1,000.00

61d

Miscellaneous, meeting

Meeting

2.00

1.00

3.00

300.00600.00600.00300.00300.00900.008,350.00
30,150.00

8,350.00
30,150.00

1,300.00
17,200.00

1,300.00
17,200.00

9,650.00
47,350.00

24aSubcontract- No. 4, NGO

Site

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

61

b

Miscellaneous, meeting

Meeting

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

a

Accomplished trough Act.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

34

Output/Activity

Quarter

1

2

Activity 3.3: To establish
demonstration plots forselected income generating
activities atselected suitable sites
Sub-total Activity 3.3
Activity 3.4: To train villagers
on practical skills for
implementing selected income
generating activities and fordeveloping
CSE of NTFPs
Sub-total Activity 3.4

Q1-Q2,Y3

Gol Contribution(Executing+Sinar Mas
Foresty)

Inputs

3

4

Unit
5

ITTO

GOI

Total

Year 3

Year 3

Year 3Total

Year 3

Total

7

10

12

14

16

18

20

21

Unit Cost

Grand Total

25aSubcontract- No. 5, NGO

Contract

2.00

2.00

4.00

7,000.00

14,000.00

14,000.00

14,000.00

14,000.00

28,000.00

61bMiscellaneous, meeting

Meeting

1.00

-

1.00

300.00300.00300.00--300.0014,300.00

14,300.00

14,000.00

14,000.00

28,300.00

26aSubcontract- No. 6, NGO

Session

3.00

3.00

6.00

4,000.00

12,000.00

12,000.00

12,000.00

12,000.00

24,000.00

61bMiscellaneous, meeting

Meeting

-

2.00

2.00

300.00--600.00600.00600.00

Q1-Q4,Y3

15
31.2
33
61
62

a
b
c
d
e

National Consultant (NC)
DSA, NC
Localt transport
Miscellaneous, meeting
Printing

MM
MD
TD
Meeting
Copy

5.00
30.00
2.00
144.00

30.00
1.00
-

5.00
30.00
30.00
3.00
144.001,000.00
70.00
50.00
300.0010.00

Q1-Q4,Y3

14
31.1
32.1
33

a
b
c
d

National Expert (NE)
DSA, NE
Air ticket
Local Transport

MM
MD
Trip
TD

5.00
27.00
15.00
-

3.00
27.00

8.00
27.00
15.00
27.00

1,000.00
70.00
250.0050.00

12,000.00
5,000.00
2,100.00
600.001,440.00
9,140.00
5,000.00
1,890.00
3,750.00-

12,000.00
5,000.00
2,100.00
600.001,440.00
9,140.00
5,000.00
1,890.00
3,750.00-

12,600.00
1,500.00
300.001,800.00
3,000.00
1,350.00

12,600.00
1,500.00
300.001,800.00
3,000.00
1,350.00

24,600.00
5,000.00
2,100.00
1,500.00
900.001,440.00
10,940.00
8,000.00
1,890.00
3,750.00
1,350.00

61eMiscellaneous, meeting

Meeting

3.00

2.00

5.00

300.00900.00900.00600.00600.001,500.00

11,540.00

11,540.00

4,950.00

4,950.00

16,490.00

16aCampaign specialist, CS

MM

5.00

-

5.00

1,200.00

6,000.00

6,000.00--

6,000.00

31.4
51
61
62
63
64
65

b
c
d
e
f
g
h

DSA,CS
Consumables
Miscellaneous, meeting
Printing of materials
Tv,talkshow
National and Regional dialogue
Domestic participantsMD
Year
Meeting
Copy
SessionSession
Event

30.00
2.00
3.00
1,000.00
1.00
4.00
4.00

3.00
900.00
2.00
2.00
2.00

30.00
2.00
6.00
1,900.00
3.00
6.00
6.00

70.00
2,000.00
300.0010.00
8,000.00
3,000.00
2,500.00

Sub-total Activity 3.7

2,100.00
4,000.00
900.0010,000.00
8,000.00
12,000.00
10,000.00
53,000.00

2,100.00
4,000.00
900.0010,000.00
8,000.00
12,000.00
10,000.00
53,000.00

900.009,000.00
16,000.00
6,000.00
5,000.00
36,900.00

900.009,000.00
16,000.00
6,000.00
5,000.00
36,900.00

2,100.00
4,000.00
1,800.00
19,000.00
24,000.00
18,000.00
15,000.00
89,900.00

Total Output 3

99,980.00

99,980.00

70,250.00

70,250.00

170,230.00

Activity 3.5: To develop anddisseminate technical manuals
on development of selected
income generating activities
Sub-total Activity 3.5
Activity 3.6: To initiate
development of legal
framework for the utilizationof environmental services byprivate sector in close
consultation with mainstakeholders
Sub-total Activity 3.6
Activity 3.7: To launch
campaign on GSK BR
development throughdialogue, production anddissemination of attractive
andeasy‐to‐read materials

Q1-Q2,Y3

ITTO Contribution

Quantity

Budgetcomponent

Q1-Q4,Y335

Total Project cost

Output/Activity
1

159,380.00

Quarter2

Inputs3

4

Non acivity based

Total non-activity based
Grand Total Project Cost
ITTO Monitoring and Review
ITTO Programme Support
National Management Cost
Grand Total Project Cost

11
12
13
19

a
b
c
d

31.5
32.1
33

e
f
g

43
44
45
46

h
i
j
k

47
42
41

l
m
n

52
53

o
p

66
67
62

q
r
s

Key personnel
Project Coordinator
Project Secretary
Technicians
Field Supervisor
Duty travel
DSA
Domestic Air ticket
Local transport
Capital Items
Operational Vehicle
Speed Boat
Camera SLR
In focus
Office operation
Space 40 M2Furniture
PC/Notebook
Consumables
Stationaries
Utilities
Miscellaneous
PSC Meeting
Financial Audit
Report Printing

Unit

ITTO

GOI

Year 3

Year 3

7

10

MM
MM
MM
MM

12.00
12.00
12.00
-

12.00

Trip
MD
Trip

30.00
6.00
6.00

16.00
4.00
4.00

Unit
Unit
Set
Set

-

-

Month
Set
Unit

-

12.00
-

Month
Month

8.00
8.00

4.00
4.00

Meeting
Year
copy

1.00
1.00
99.00

100.00

5

36

Total

12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
46.00
10.00
10.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
1.00
1.00
199.00111,800.00

111,800.00

271,180.00

ITTO Contribution

Gol Contribution(Executing+Sinar Mas
Foresty)

Year 3Total

Year 3

Total

12

14

16

18

20

21

1,500.00
500.00800.00500.0018,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
2,100.00
1,500.00
300.003,200.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
1,485.00
50,185.00
209,565.00

18,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
2,100.00
1,500.00
300.003,200.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
1,485.00
50,185.00
209,565.00
12,001.07
26,587.93
248,154.00

6,000.00
1,120.00
1,000.00
200.007,200.00
1,600.00
1,000.00
1,500.00
19,620.00
131,420.00

6,000.00
1,120.00
1,000.00
200.007,200.00
1,600.00
1,000.00
1,500.00
19,620.00
131,420.00
672.00132,092.00

18,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
6,000.00
3,220.00
2,500.00
500.007,200.00
4,800.00
3,000.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
2,985.00
69,805.00
340,985.00
12,001.07
26,587.93
672.00380,246.00

Quantity

Budgetcomponent

159,380.00

Unit Cost

70.00
250.0050.00
600.00400.00250.002,000.00
4,000.00
15.00

Grand Total

3,5,2, Consolidated yearly budget
Category
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
29
30
31

32
33
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
80
81
82
89
100

Description
Personnel
Project Coordinator
Project Secretary
Technicians
National Expert
National Consultant
Campaigning specialist
Operator
MCB Secretary
Field supervisor
Laborer
Sub Total
Sub Contract
Sub contract No. 1 UN
Sub contract No. 2 LEO
Sub contract No. 3, UN
Sub contract No. 4, NGO
Sub contract No. 5, NGO
Sun contract No. 6, NGO
Sub Total
Duty Travel
Daily Subsistance Allowance
31.1 DSA National Expert
31.2 DSA National Consultant
31.3 DSA Campaining Specialist
31.4 DSA PMU
Air Ticket
32.1 Domestic Air Ticket
Local Transport
Sub Total
Capital Item
Personal computer/Notebook
Furniture
VehicleSpeed Boat
Camera SLR
In-focusSpace 40m2
Sub Total
Consummable item
Consumable
Stationary
Utilities
Provider rental
Satelite imagery
Sub Total
Miscelaneous
Meeting
Printing
TV Talkshow
National and Regional Dialog
Domestic participant
PSC Meeting
Financial Audit
MCB Quarterly meeting
Sub Total
Total Project Cost
National Management Cost
Project Monitoring and administration
ITTO monitoring and Review
ITTO Programme support
Total Project Monitoring and Administration
GRANT TOTAL

Total

Year 318,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
16,800.00
34,800.00
6,000.00
3,600.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
106,800.00
14,000.00
9,000.00
28,000.00
24,000.00
75,000.00

18,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
16,800.00
34,800.00
6,000.00
3,600.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
106,800.00

1,890.00
8,050.00
2,100.00
3,220.00
7,000.00
6,350.00
28,610.00

1,890.00
8,050.00
2,100.00
3,220.00
7,000.00
6,350.00
28,610.00

7,200.00
7,200.00

7,200.00
7,200.00

10,000.00
4,800.00
3,000.00
900.0018,700.00

10,000.00
4,800.00
3,000.00
900.0018,700.00

13,600.00
27,275.00
24,000.00
18,000.00
15,000.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
800.00104,675.00
340,985.00
672.0013,600.00
27,275.00
24,000.00
18,000.00
15,000.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
800.00104,675.00
340,985.00

12,001.07
26,587.93
38,589.00
380,246.00

37

14,000.00
9,000.00
28,000.00
24,000.00
75,000.00

3.5.3. ITTO yearly budget
Category
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
29
30
31

32
33
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
80
81
82
89
100

Description
Personnel
Project Coordinator
Project Secretary
Technicians
National Expert
National Consultant
Campaigning specialist
Operator
MCB Secretary
Field supervisor
Laborer
Sub Total
Sub Contract
Sub contract No. 1 UN
Sub contract No. 2 LEO
Sub contract No. 3, UN
Sub contract No. 4, NGO
Sub contract No. 5, NGO
Sun contract No. 6, NGO
Sub Total
Duty Travel
Daily Subsistance Allowance
31.1 DSA National Expert
31.2 DSA National Consultant
31.3 DSA Campaining Specialist
31.4 DSA PMU
Air Ticket
32.1 Domestic Air Ticket
Local Transport
Sub Total
Capital Item
Personal computer/Notebook
Furniture
VehicleSpeed Boat
Camera SLR
In-focusSpace 40m2
Sub Total
Consummable item
Consumable
Stationary
Utilities
Provider rental
Satelite imagery
Sub Total
Miscelaneous
Meeting
Printing
TV Talkshow
National and Regional Dialog
Domestic participant
PSC Meeting
Financial Audit
MCB Quarterly meeting
Sub Total
Total Project Cost
National Management Cost
Project Monitoring and administration
ITTO monitoring and Review
ITTO Programme support (total project cost+81)x12%
Total Project Monitoring and Administration
GRANT TOTAL

38

Total

Year 318,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
10,600.00
32,700.00
6,000.00
82,900.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
14,000.00
12,000.00
36,000.00

18,000.00
6,000.00
9,600.00
10,600.00
32,700.00
6,000.00
82,900.00

1,890.00
8,050.00
2,100.00
2,100.00

1,890.00
8,050.00
2,100.00
2,100.00

6,000.00
1,300.00
21,440.00

6,000.00
1,300.00
21,440.00--

7,000.00
3,200.00
2,000.00
900.0013,100.00

7,000.00
3,200.00
2,000.00
900.0013,100.00

7,100.00
13,025.00
8,000.00
12,000.00
10,000.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
56,125.00
209,565.00

7,100.00
13,025.00
8,000.00
12,000.00
10,000.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
56,125.00
209,565.00

12,001
26,58838,589.00
248,154.00

4,000.00
6,000.00
14,000.00
12,000.00
36,000.00

3.5.4. Sinarmas Forestry & Partners yearly budget
Category
10
13
14
15
17
18
19
19
20
21
22
25
26
29
30
31

32
33
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
47
49
50
51
55
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
68
69
70
80
81
82
89
100

Description
Personnel
Technicians
National Expert
National Consultant
Operator
MCB Secretary
Field supervisor
Laborer
Sub Total
Sub Contract
Sub contract No. 1 UN
Sub contract No. 2 LEO
Sub contract No. 5, NGO
Sun contract No. 6, NGO
Sub Total
Duty Travel
Daily Subsistance Allowance
31.1 DSA National Expert
31.2 DSA National Consultant
31.4 DSA PMU
Air Ticket
32.1 Domestic Air Ticket
Local Transport
Sub Total
Capital Item
Personal computer/Notebook
VehicleSpeed Boat
Camera SLR
In-focusSpace 40m2
Sub Total
Consummable item
Consumable
Satelite imagery
Sub Total
Miscelaneous
Meeting
Printing
TV Talkshow
National and Regional Dialog
Domestic participant
MCB Quarterly meeting
Sub Total
Total Project Cost
National Management Cost
Project Monitoring and administration
ITTO monitoring and Review
ITTO Programme support (70+91+92)x12%
Total Project Monitoring and Administration
GRANT TOTAL

Total

Year 33,200.00
2,100.00
3,600.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
20,900.00
10,000.00
3,000.00
14,000.00
12,000.00
39,000.00

3,200.00
2,100.00
3,600.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
20,900.00

1,120.00

1,120.00

1,000.00
5,050.00
7,170.00

1,000.00
5,050.00
7,170.00

7,200.00
7,200.00

7,200.00
7,200.00

3,000.00
3,000.00

3,000.00
3,000.00

6,500.00
14,250.00
16,000.00
6,000.00
5,000.00
800.0048,550.00
125,820.00

6,500.00
14,250.00
16,000.00
6,000.00
5,000.00
800.0048,550.00
125,820.00

125,820.00

39

10,000.00
3,000.00
14,000.00
12,000.00
39,000.00

3.5.5 Executing Agency yearly budget (GoI)
Category
10
13
14
19
20
29
30
39
40
42
49
50
52
53
59
60
69
70
80
81
82
89

Description
Personnel
Technicians
National Expert
Sub Total
Sub Contract
Sub Total
Duty Travel
Sub Total
Capital Item
Furniture
Sub Total
Consummable item
Stationary
Utilities
Sub Total
Miscelaneous
Sub Total
Total project cost
National Management Cost
Project Monitoring and administration
ITTO monitoring and Review
ITTO Programme support (70+91+92)x12%
Total Project Monitoring and Administration
GRANT TOTAL

Total

Year 33,000.00
3,000.00

3,000.00
3,000.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,600.00
1,000.00
2,600.00

1,600.00
1,000.00
2,600.00

5,600.00
672.005,600.00

6,272.00

Notes on budget revision
The project duration is devided into two phases. Phase I is for 24 months and Phase II is for 12months, therefore the allocation budget has been revised as follows:i. Total ITTO’s contributions is 498,154, consisting of phase I US$ 250,000 and phase II US$ 248,154
ii. Total GOI’s total contribution is US$ 374,106, consisting of phase I US$ 242,014 and Phase II US$
132,092
iii. The total project budget in Phase I is now US$ 492,014, comprising US$ 250,000 of ITTO
contribution and US$ 242,014 of GOI’s, respectively. The remaiing 380,246 is allocated for Phase II,comprising US$ 248,154 of ITTO contribution and US$ 132,092 of GOI’s
iv. ITTO Programme support cost 12% for Phase I and II has been recalculated in the budget.

40

3.6. Assumption, risk and sustainability
3.6.1. Assumption and risks
The specific objective of this project is to initiate an effective implementation of sustainable
management and conservation of the reserve through enhanced planning framework, enhanced
institutional capacity and increased support by stakeholders. Defined project outputs will be delivered
through the full execution of planned activities under each output. It is noted that implementation of theplanned activities is pretty much under the full control of the project management team (PMT), thus
entails very little risk, provided that a sound implementation strategy is developed and pursued.
Achievement of the specific objective is subject to the status of formulated ISMP; if the ISMP is adopted
and disseminated; it is ready for implementation and the specific objective is achieved. Adoption of the
ISMP, however, is the domain of the provincial and district governments; it is beyond the control of the
PMT, thus obviously involves risks. In order the project contributes to realizing the reserve management
objectives, adopted ISMP should be fully used to guide management operations. Implementation of
ISMP, however, requires the full support by the provincial and district governments through adoption of
appropriate policy initiatives and allocation of sufficient resources for law enforcement; otherwiseachievement of the development objective could be compromised due to, for instance, inconsistent district
spatial planning and occurence of forest encroachment as well as illegal occupation.
Above information indicates that the potential risk of the project is weak support of the government at
the provincial and district levels on the adoption and implementation of the ISMP. The mitigating
measures for coping the risks are:-

To obtain authentic proof of support from stakeholders group reached during the public
consultation process-

To convince the provincial and district governments that adoption of the ISMP is
supported by stakeholders-

To assure the district governments, through continued consultation, that adoption of the
supportive policy initiatives are required for adequate implementation of the ISMP-

The district governments must always involve the project in spatial planning process andallocate sufficient resources for law enforcement to control deforestation and forest
degradation

Monitoring of the risk will be carried out through periodical consultation with concerned gorvenrmnet
authorities and insider contacts in order to detect development in decision making process that may
affect management conduct of the reserve.
3.6.2 Sustainability
To ensure sustainability of the project, several activities initiated under the project will be continued,
expanded or followed-up after project completion including:•Operational implementation of newly adopted ISMP will be safeguarded by Coordinating Board
chaired by the Governor of Riau.

41

•

The role of coordinating board will be continuously performed.

•

Protocols and SOP management operations will be applied.

•

Newly formed legal framework for utilization of environmental services will be collaboratively
implemented by the Coordinating Board, BBKSDA, provincial and district governments.

•

The operational of database management system will be maintained by Coordinating Board, local
governments, BBKSDA and Sinar Mas Forestry & Partners.

•

The developed technical manuals for livelihood development will be used by local communities
and NGOs.

•

The expansion of demonstration plots for community income generating activities will be executedby Sinar Mas Forestry & Partners as well as provincial and district governments.

•

Local communities, comprising about 40% of women will be involved in the income generating
activities and other community development programs during and after project implementation.
This is so because the activities are designed to support household livelihood wherein wives playessential role.

•

The funding mechanism will be further implemented by the Coordinating Board and relevant
institutions.

After project completion, the local communities are to continue implementing the livelihood activities
initiated under the project. It is therefore crucial that the livelihood activities are identified in close
consultation with local communities. To preserve the interest of the local communities in implementing
livelihood activities after project completion, such activities must generate income stream for them. To thisend, concerned authorities of the reserve need to assist in marketing of produce by providing market
information and developing appropriate marketing strategy. It is worth emphasizing at this stage that
support of local communities on the management and conservation of the reserve is, to a larger extent,
dependent on benefits of the reserve that are accruable to them.
In addition to the above, a wide range of institutions will involve in the project initiated activities, suchas Provincial government (Provincial Forestry Agencies), FRDC, BBKSDA (DG of Forest Protection andNature Conservation, MoEF) and Sinarmas Forestry & partners, research institutions and universities. The
involvement of these institutions will secure the implementation of listed activities. The aforementioned
institutions posses a great deal of interest in and formal mandate ensuring sustainable management andconservation of GSK-BR. BBKSDA Riau has been mandated by the MoEF to ensure the sustainable
management and conservation of the wildlife reserves occupying the core area thus plays critical role inthe development of core areas; whereas the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (Man and Biosphere) and
Ministry of Environment will be involved in monitoring of project operations to ensure that projectinterventions are progressing on track to achieve the planned project objectives.
The sustainability of the project will also be achieved through: (i) prompt identification of committed
and interest personal from the institutions concerned with the issues on landscape conservation, (ii)involvement of relevant institutions in project implementation from the early stage of operations, and (iii)
proper identification of needed resources for implementation of critical activities after project completion.

42

PART 4. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS
4.1. Organization structure and stakeholder involvement mechanism
4.1.1. Executing agency and partner
The Executing Agency to implement this project is Forest Research and Development Center(FRDC), FORDA. In the execution of this project, the EA will be assisted by Collaborating Agencies,
BBKSDA and Sinarmas Forestry and partners. Sinarmas Forestry and Partners is a holding company
operating in forest industrial plantation in Sumatra and Kalimantan. Other agencies involve in this project
are Provincial Forest Agency, Indonesian Institute of Science, Forestry Research Development andInovation Agency, and other relevant stakeholders.
4.1.2. Project management teamAll project operational activities will be under the direction of a Project Steering Committee (PSC).
The day to day management will be carried out by a Project Management Team which consists of a Project
Coordinator, Project Secretary, Field Supervisors and Technicians. The Project Coordinator will be
officially assigned by EA in close consultation with Sinarmas Forestry and Partners. Project Secretary andother key personnel will be hired on a contractual basis, soliciated through job advertisements. The
National Consultants/Experts will be hired to implement particular activities based on professional
expertise. The project organizational structure is as depicted in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Project Organizational Structure
Executing and
Collaborating
Agencie(FRDC,BBKSDA, Sinarmas
Forestry)

Project Steering Committee

Project Coordinator
Secretary/financeWorking Team for
Integrated Strategic
Management Plan

Consultants, Competentinstitutions, NGO

Working Team for Capacity
building for Biosphere
Reserve management

Consultants, Competentinstitutions, NGO

43

Working team forpromotion of stakeholders
supportConsultants, Competentinstitutions, NGO

4.1.3. Project Steering Committee
The Executing Agency will form a Project Steering Committee (PSC). The primary roles are to guideand provide direction of the project, oversee progress of project implementation, approve work plans andassociated budgets, review of necessary changes in the project activities and its associated budget. The
members of the PSC at least consist of: Chairperson representing GOI to be appointed by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry
 Representatives of ITTO and donor countries Representatives of Riau Provincial and District Governments
 Representative of National Institute of Sciences/Indonesia MAB Programme Representative of DG Forest Protection and Nature Conservation
 Representative of FORDA Representative of Sinarmas Forestry & Partners
 Project Coordinator as the secretary Representative of local NGO
The primary roles of the PSC to be established include:• To review operational management plans and endorse as appropriate• To assess progress in implementation of activities and make the necessary recommendations for
improving effectiveness of project operations• To provide advices on resolution of any problems encountered in project implementation• To review any changes made by the Executing Agency to the project document and approve thechanges or otherwise• To review reports on financial and technical aspects of the project.
A representative of local NGOs will be included as member of PSC: this inclusion is thought crucial
considering the role the NGOs play in the implementation of community development related activities.
This representative could be from either PASA (Sumatran Association on Nature-Perkumpulan Alam
Sumatra), FKKM-Riau (Riau Forestry Community Forum-Forum Komunikasi Masyarakat Kehutanan Riau)
or Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat Siak Cerdas noting that FKKM looks more appropriate as therepresentative.
This committee will meet at least once a year. However, special meeting may be organized as needarises. Schedule of the committee meeting will be determined by EA in consultation with ITTO.
4.1.4. Stakeholder involvement mechanism
A separate stakeholder forum will not be established under the project; the well-functioning of the
management coordinating board (MCB) will automatically serve as a stakeholder involvement mechanism
because the board is represented by the main stakeholders namely: provincial and local authorities,
forestry institutions, local communities, NGOs, investors, and other groups interested in biosphere reserve
development. At MCB meetings the stakeholders may meet periodically to exchange views and ideas,
develop propositions and make recommendations to the executing agency in view of improving
44

efficiency of project implementation. While the meetings has no formal direct responsibility for project
management, its advices and recommendations are invaluable inputs to the project.

4.2. Reporting, review, monitoring and evaluation• Inception Report
To be submitted after signing of Agreement between ITTO, Executing Agency and Government ofIndonesia. The Inception report contains the confirmation of the availability of office space andfacilities, registered banking account, key project personnel and any changes if any and first YearlyPlan of Operation.
• Yearly Plan of Operation
To be submitted a year before the commencement of project activities in the subsequent year for
endorsement by PSC, as appropriate and by ITTO. The first YPO will be attached to the Inception
Report. The subsequent YPOs will be submitted at least ten weeks before the beginning of theplanned year. ITTO approves the YPO based on endorsement of PSC.
•

Project Progress Reports
To be submitted bi-annually or as requested by ITTO. This report contains information on theexecution and the progress of activities during the period covered for the report, achieved output andinputs applied.

• Project Technical Reports
To be submitted in accordance with the schedule and at the end of project period. The Technical
Report contains technical and scientific data and information, analyses and other project results. A
technical report may be produced from one or a set of activities in one Output. The report may also
contain present procedure and methodologies adopted, the data generated and the results achieved.
• Financial Report
An audited financial report will be submitted to ITTO within three months after the end of the current
fiscal year. A final audited report will be submitted within four months after the date of projectcompletion. The project will appoint a public accountant to be submitted to ITTO for approval prior tocarry out project financial auditing.
• Project Completion Report
A Project Completion Report will be submitted to ITTO within three months after project completion.
The report contains summary of the activities executed, unexecuted (if any), inputs and expenditures,
outputs achieved and objectives during the project implementation period. The report also highlights
the most critical differences between planned and realized project elements using original project
documents as primary reference, lessons learned from the implementation of the project.

4.3. Dissemination and mainstreaming of project learning
4.3.1. Dissemination of project learning
Project learning and results will be disseminated through various means and channels at theimplementation stage and after project completion, as outlined below:
45• Integrated strategic management plan (ISMP)
Developed and adopted ISMP will be widely disseminated through local and national workshops,
dialogues and other forms of public consultations during project period prior to its implementation.
• Technical Reports
Will be published and widely disseminated to the relevant users.
• Brochures/technical documents
To be published regularly and distributed within the province and other national events. The brochuresand documents contain all necessary information regarding the GSK-BR, the potential and strategicplan toward sustainable use.
• National and Regional Workshops
The workshops will be organized to disseminate project findings and results and to receive inputs forfurther improvement and implementation.
• Completion ReportWill be printed and distributed nation-wide, interested ITTO member countries and other relevant
institutions such as UNESCO.
4.3.2. Mainstreaming of the project learning
Key findings and results of this project are expected to contribute to policy making at the central,provincial and local governments with respect to sustainable management of PSF, protected andconservation areas as well as production forest under biosphere reserve concept.
• The newly formulated and widely adopted Integrated Strategic Management Plan (ISMP) will be likely
to become a model for managing private-public initiative Biosphere Reserve. This is because GSKBR has a unique PSF ecosystem consisting of protected, conserved and production forests andsurrounded by large forest and non-forest plantations.
• The ISMP will greatly strengthen the work of existing Coordinating Board in managing the GSK-BR,
for which the plan is not yet developed since its inclusion to UNESCO’s monitoring network in 2009.
• Newly developed legal framework for utilization of environmental services will enable all interested
parties (i.e district government) to further develop potential environmental services for economic
purposes and community development, such as ecotourism, fisheries and other NTFP program.
• The developed funding mechanism will likely to be adopted and supported for long term andsustainable management of GSK-BB by the MCB and concerned institutions.
The above project results will be widely disseminated and handed over to concerned authorities andparties; special discussions will be further organized to disseminate the results to government authorities
at different levels for policy consideration.

46

Annex 1: Profile of the Executing Agency
BACKGROUND
A. Profile of the Executing Agency
The Executing Agency of the project is the Forest Research and Development Center (under
Forestry Research Development and Inovation Agency-FORDA), Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
FORDA is responsible for research and development in forestry resources, natural resources andecosystem conservation in Indonesia. This institution holds main functions as follows:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Research and development to secure forest resource base;
Coordinate and conduct R&D in conservation and rehabilitation of forest resources;
Conduct research and development in wildlife management and conservation;
Conduct research and development on sustainable management and conservation on conservation
forests,;
Improve the practice in forest management and utilization
Promote technology in rehabilitation and restoration of ecosystems
Establish collaboration on conservation of natural resources ecosystems development andpartnerships;
R&D to support environmental services and eco-tourism;
Implementation of general affairs and intern.
Figure 5. The organization structure of FORDA

FORDA

FORDA

GeneralAdministration

Center forConservation
andRehabilitation• R&D

Center for Forest
product
development andutilization

Center for Socioeconomic andforest policy
analyses••

Researchersgroups/Fungsional
Group

47

Planning andCooperation

Data, Evaluation
and Public
Relation

Center for forest
productivity
improvement

FORDA’s PERSONNEL
The personnel within the FORDA possess over 1750 staffs, consisting of research officers at PhDs level(60), Masters (>200) and Bachelors (>215) and technicians and the rest are administrative staffs. The
annual costs is approximately US$ 200 millions (2012) for research and development, maintaining
research forest, development and other administrative support costs.

FORDA’s INFRASTRUCTURES• Library• Several modern laboratories, distributed in Regional Research Centers• Nation widely distributed Research Forests areas• Office buildlings and other facilities (greenhouse and nurseries)• Experimental forest sites• Experienced Domestic and International Cooperation (ITTO, JICA, EU, Korea, ACIAR etc.)48

Annex 2: Profile of the Collaborating Agency
Implementation of the proposed project will be carried out in collaboration with Sinarmas
Forestry and Partners (PT. Arara Abadi).
1. Expertise of Sinarmas Forestry (SMF) SMF is the Plantation forest management organization
Manages Asia Pulp and Paper (APP) - owned HTI concession areas (6 Forest
Management Units, + 1 million hectares) and exclusive supplier of pulpwood to APP
Indonesia pulp mills
Riau : PT. Arara Abadi, PT. Satria Perkasa Agung, PT. Abadi Lestari, Jambi : PT.
Wira Karya Sakti, West Kalimantan : PT. Finnantara Intiga, East Kalimantan : PT.
Sumalindo Hutani Jaya



Provides technical and some financial supports to some 30 partners-Forest
Management Units (FMUs)

2. Infrastructure of SMF






Network of roads and water transport (Main Road ± 3,200km and Main Canal ±4,600km)More than 80 Forest Camps and supporting facilities
Forest R&D Centre (largest well-resourced centre in Indonesia)
Well established communication and transport system
Community training Centre completer with permanent employees involved in various
CSR and community program.

3. Budget
Based on Ministry of Forestry Decree No. 743/KPTS-III/1996 that PT. Arara Abadi with total
areas of 299,975 hectares.
The budget of PT. Arara Abadi next year 2013- 2015 is as follows:Year (US $)Activities
Planning
Infrastucture
General Administration
Planting/Maintenance/
Protecting
Environment

11,724,697-

164,869
5,814,765

164,869
5,814,765

164,869
5,814,765

43,861,553
805,938

43,861,553
805,938

43,861,553
805,938

Source : RKUPHHK-HTI PT. Arara Abadi 2011-2020

4. Personnel
PT Arara Abadi staff members consist of 1,497 personnel, with university degrees in various
fields (390 persons), high school graduates (879 persons) and others (228 persons).

49Annex 3: Key personnel to be provided by EA and CA
Educational
BackgroundNo.

Name/Designation

1.

Kirsfianti L Ginoga/Director
for Forest R&D Center

Socio
Economic

Member of PSC, supervisory body

2.

Haris Surono/Manager ofEnvironmental Services ofSinarmas Forestry
Supriatno/Staff forEnvironmental Services ofSinarmas Forestry
Suharyono,M.Si.Head of
BBKSDA
Prov Forestry Services

Forestry Degree

Project Senior staff for GSK-BR Buffer Zone
Development

Forestry Degree

Project Senior Staff for GSK-BR Buffer Zone
Development

Forestry Degree

Project Senior staff GSK-BR Core Area
Development
Member of PSC, supervisory body

3.
4.
5.

-

49

Role in project implementation

Annex 4:

Outlines of terms of reference (TOR) for key personnel and professionals to be
paid with ITTO funds

Position
Project Coordinator

Project Secretary
Technicians
Field Supervisors
National Expert
for Activity 1.1

National Consultant
for Activity 1.2
National Consultant
for Activity 1.3
National Consultant
for Activity 1.4
National Consultant
for Activities 1.5
National Consultant
for Activity 2.1
National Consultant
for Activity 2.3
National Consultant
for Activity 2.4
National Consultant
for Activity 2.5

Main tasks• To manage project operations on a day-to-day basis• To prepare plans of operation, monitoring and evaluation• To prepare and submit documents and reports to EA and ITTO in
accordance with the project agreement• To select consultants and other professionals to assist in project
implementation• To organize various meetings including for PSC and PTC on progress in
implementation• To assist PC in managing project operations• To organize meetings and travels• To do other tasks as requested by PC• To input data on information system• To provide data and information for PC and Consultants as requested• To assist in developing operational plans• To supervise and to report implementation of activities and field
operations• To review existing planning framework pinpointing its flaws andweaknesses• To prepare and propose an adequate planning framework• To identify authorities concerned with GSK-BR management planning• To hold a focus discussion on planning framework• To review existing landuse practices on GSK-BR area
• To consult with relevant authorities on appropriate landuse policy• To make recommendations on suitable long-term landuse on individualzones/areas• To review existing data on bio-physical and socio-economic of GSK-BR• To update data as necessary using available and reliable sources tofacilitate formulation of ISMP
• To develop appropriate design of website for GSK-BR• To test workability of the design• To prepare operational manual of the website• To train technicians for the operation of the website• To consult with main stakeholders on the structure of ISMP
• To draft an ISMP in collaboration with consultant• To present draft ISMP to technical meetings and finalize accordingly• To assess current functioning of MCB focusing on weaknesses• To prepare a sound mid-term workplan for MCB and identify needresources for operations• To arrange endorsement of the workplan by relevant parties• To draft protocols of management operations through consultation withconcerned authorities• To organize technical meetings on the draft• To finalize the protocols using inputs from the meetings• To draft SOP for management operations through consultation withconcerned authorities• To organize technical meetings on the SOP• To finalize the SOP using inputs from the meetings• To consult with concerned authorities on the format of funding
mechanism• To develop suitable design of funding mechanism• To hold discussions on funding mechanism as appropriate• To take care of adoption process of the mechanism

49

Position
National Consultant
for Activity 3.5
Sub-contract No. 1
Activity 1.6, UN
Sub-contract No. 2
Activity 1.7, LEO
Sub-contract No. 3
Activity 2.2, UN
Sub-contract No. 4
Activity 3.1, NGO
Sub-contract No. 5
Activity 3.3, NGO

Sub-contract No. 6
Activity 3.4, NGO
International Consultant
for Activity 1.5

International Consultant
for Activity 3.6

Campaigning Specialist
for Activity 3.7
Notes:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Main tasks
To review the technical reports pertaining to income generating activities
To field verify the information presented in the technical reports
To prepare technical manuals on income generating activities
To validate the manuals through consultation with relevant parties
To consult with concerned authorities on targets of the consultation
To develop a work programme to conduct consultation
To hold consultations
To prepare a technical report on the consultation process
To identify workshop participants in close consultation with PC
To develop a work programme for the workshop
To report on the conduct and results of the workshop
To consult with EA on training participants
To develop training materials suitable for trainees
To develop training schedule and conduct the training
To prepare a technical report on the training
To consult with PC on targeted villages and sub-districts
To develop a work programme in close consultation with PC
To conduct the dialogues
To prepare a technical report on the dialogues
To select income generating activities for development based on resultsof activity 3.1
To identify suitable sites for development of demonstration plots
To develop design of demonstration plots
To identify need resources for demo plots construction
To identify and recruit villagers for construction of demo plots
To identify trainees in close consultation with FS and PC
To develop training materials and schedule
To conduct the training
To submit a technical report on the training
To review existing data and information in collaboration with the NC
To search for additional data as necessary
To consult with government authorities and main stakeholders on
preferred structure and substance of ISMP
To draft ISMP and present it to technical meetings for scrutiny
To finalize ISMP as appropriate
To review existing rules and regulations governing utilization ofenvironmental services in collaboration with the NC
To identify potential services of GSK-BR for development
To identify suitable methods for utilization of ES
To develop needed legal framework to facilitate utilization of ES drawing
on the experience of ITTO member countries
To prepare a technical report on the assignment
To develop a campaigning strategy in close consultation with PC
To prepare attractive and easy-to-read campaigning materials
To widely disseminate campaigning materials
To organize dialogues, TV talk shows, etc. as appropriatei) Activities 3.1; 3.3 and 3.4 are best to be sub-contracted to local NGOs as they are more familiar
with such work then most other institutions and experienced NGOs are available in Riau province
for hiring.
ii) International Consultants are needed to assist in implementation of Activities 1.5 and 3.6 to benefit
from their experience in doing similar works in other countries and to facilitate effective technology
transfer.

49

Annex 5:

The recommendations of the 46th Expert Panel and the respective modifications
made

No.

Specific recommendation

Modification made1.

Provide a map showing thelocation of the project site in Riau
Province
Provide more information on thegeographical area of the Giam
Siak Kecil Bukit Batu Biosphere
Reserve (GSK-BR) in Riau
Province; Provide information on
the concept of Biosphere Reserve
under UNESCO MAB Programme
Redefine the key problem to beaddressed by the project. The
current key problem appears as aneffect rather than a key problem

Map of the project site appears
as Figure 1

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Improve the logical frameworkmatrix by redefining the statementof the specific objective to ensure
the effects to be achieved by the
project; The indicators should be
improved in SMART (Specific,
Measurable, Appropriate, Realistic
and Time-bound) way; Include thenumber of women to be engaged
in the project activities as part ofindicators if feasible

Provide more information on thecurrent legal framework forpayments for environmental
services in connection with Activity
3.6
Review the work plan for the
implementation of Activities 1.51.7, given the fact that that the
adoption of the Integrated Strategic
Management Plan (ISMP) will betaken up through a series ofconsultation workshops among key
stakeholders

Locus of modification• Information on geographic
area provided• The concept of biospherereserve development
concisely provided

Section 1.3.1, p. 4

The key problem redefined as“Sustainable management andconservation of GSK-BR is noteffectively implemented” notingthat any problem is always aneffect of causing problems• The specific objective
redefined as “to initiate aneffective implementation ofsustainable management andconservation of GSK-BR”
corresponds to the redefined
key problem• The indicators have been
improved in a SMART manner• The number of women to
engage in project activities
may reach 40% of totalvillagers
More information on legal
framework relating to Activity 3.6
provided

Section 2.1.3, p. 11
Figure 2, Problem tree,
p. 12

The workplan for
implementation of Activities 1.51.7 reviewed and justified

Section 3.3, p. 20

49

Section 1.3.2 (c) , p. 4

Figure 3, Solution tree
Section 2.2.2, p. 16

Section 2.1.4, p. 14
Section 3.5.2, p. 32

Section 3.1.2, p. 17

No.
7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

Specific recommendation
Revise the project budget in thefollowing way:
• Scale down the provision
allocated for the project
personnel• Provide concise terms ofreferences for each of the subcontractors• Recalculate the ITTO
Programme Support Costs (Subcomponent 83) specified in thebudget so as to conform with the
new standard of 12% of the total
ITTO project costs in accordancewith the decision of the 48th
Session of the ITTC
Improve the potential risk
assessment by focusing on specificrisks. The identified risk of“Inconsistent government policy on
biosphere reserve development” isregarded as a national policy
aspect rather than a project
management aspect
Improve the sustainability bydescribing the engagement of local
communities after projectcompletion
Review the inclusion of arepresentative of NGOs in the
Project Steering Committee (PSC)
and elaborate the primary role of
the PSC
Provide more information on thecurrent Management Coordination
Board to ensure the effective
participation of key stakeholders

Modification madeLocus ofmodification• The ITTO’s contribution topersonnel component reduced
and GOI’s contribution
increased• Concise TORs for subcontractors provided• ITTO Programme Support
costs recalculated at 12% of
total ITTO project costs

Tables 3.4.1 tru 3.4.5
Notes on budget p.31

Potential risks reassessed andmitigating measures identified

Section 3.5.1, p. 32

Engagement of local
communities after projectcompletion elaborated

Section 3.5.2, p. 32• Inclusion of NGO Rep. in the
PSC reviewed and justified• Role of the PSC elaborated

Section 4.1.3, p. 35

More information on the
management coordinating board
provided based on the relevant
decree of Riau Governor

Section 2.1.1, p. 949

Annex 4, seeappropriate page
Table 3.4.3

Annex 6:

The recommendations of the 47th Expert Panel and the respective modifications
made

No.

Specific recommendation

Modification madeLocus of modification

1.

Further improve the assumptions
assessment in the logical framework matrix
by highlighting potential obstacles which arebeyond the control of project management

The assumtions on
LFM have beenrevised based on thediscussion presented
in Section 3.5.1

Sections 2.1.4, p. 14
and 3.5.1, p. 32

2.

Based on the refined assumptions in the
logical framework matrix, further improve
the risks assessment by focusing on
potential risks including inconsistent
government policies on biosphere reserve
development. Further elaborate the risk
mitigation measures and how they will bemonitored in the course of project
implementation

Risk assessment is
discussed in Section
3.5.1 and mitigating
measures improved

Section3.5.1, p. 32

Risk monitoring is
also discussed in
Section 3.5.1

Please note that the bolded and underlined texts pertaining to the recommendations of the 46th Expert Panelhave been normalized; existing bolded and underlined texts are now only those that accomodate thereccommendations the 47th Expert Panel.

49