February 2013

Information sheet 6

Dairy Cow-Calf Separation and Natural Weaning
Introduction

It is common practice in the dairy industry for cows and calves to be separated shortly after birth, either
immediately or within a few days (Passillé et al. 2008). This is carried out for the perceived benefits ofeconomic gain, by collecting a higher milk yield for human consumption; better control of calf feed intake withartificial feeding; faster return to oestrus of the dam by avoiding suckling; improved milk let-down in the
parlour; reduced distress by removing the calf before the cow-calf bond forms (Flower and Weary 2003) andhygiene, by preventing contact between calves and other adults (Wagenaar and Langhout 2006).
A recent survey of people involved in the dairy industry and those with no involvement found that 9% of
respondents were undecided and 48% were against separating dairy calves from the cow within the first few
hours after birth (Ventura et al. 2013). The practice contrasts with the natural behaviour of free-living cows,
which would give birth in an isolated location, keep the calf hidden in undergrowth for 2-10 days, and thenrejoin the herd (Flower and Weary 2003). Modern dairy cows still maintain this instinct, and give birth in an
enclosed area on commercial farms if given the option (Keyserlingk and Weary 2012). The behaviour protects
the calf from predators and allows the cow-calf bond to form without interference from other herd members(Keyserlingk and Weary 2007). At 2 weeks of age the calf would be temporarily left with other calves andwatched by one or two herd members (Marchant-Forde et al. 2002). The calf would also suckle for several
months, becoming largely independent of milk by 6-8 months, spending time apart and socialising with othercalves, but maintaining a close bond with the dam. After weaning, males would leave to join a bachelor groupand females would stay in the dam’s herd and occasionally suckle, even after the birth of another calf (Flower
and Weary 2003).
There is a renewed interest in raising calves with cows, following reports of improved health and productivity
and a growing interest in ecological milk (Passillé et al. 2008) and animal welfare issues (Wagenaar andLanghout 2006, Weary 2012). Mixed suckling-milking systems are also still common in some countries. Suckling
until natural weaning maximises welfare and can provide multiple benefits to cows and calves, as well as the
producer.

Benefits to Dairy Cows
HealthCows suckled by their calf have a reduced risk of retaining the foetal membrane post-partum (Flower andWeary 2003). Suckling has other beneficial effects, including reducing the risk of post-calving disease,improving involution of the uterus post-partum; reducing the risk of clinical mastitis by up to 2.5 times,
reducing the quantity of residual milk left in the udder (Flower and Weary 2003) and has no negative effects
on somatic cell count (Wagenaar and Langhout 2006). Removing the calf has been shown to be stressful tocows (Flower and Weary 2003) and repeated exposure to stressors can damage health. Physiological indicators
which show that removing the calf is stressful to cows include an immediate rapid increase in heart rate
(Hopster et al. 1995, Stehulouá et al. 2008), reduction in rumination (Flower and Weary 2003), disturbed sleep(Ruckebusch 1975) and an increase in visible eye white, a sign of stress (Sandem et al. 2005). Cows also
showed an increased heart rate to recordings of their own and another calf’s call played back to them
(Marchant-Forde et al. 2002).

Behaviour

www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com

Page 1

February 2013

Information sheet 6

Legislation in the UK (Animal Welfare Act 2006) states that an animal should be able to exhibit normal
behaviour. As described, cows naturally show extensive maternal behaviour, including licking, nursing andprotective behaviour and developing a bond which gets stronger over time (Keyserlingk and Weary 2007).
Licking is essential post-partum to establish the maternal bond and to reduce the risk of rejection by the dam.
Licking continues infrequently throughout lactation and is a common social behaviour, even amongst adults(Keyserlingk and Weary 2007). Early separation of the cow and calf prevents natural maternal and suckling
behaviour and can be a cause of poor welfare for both (FAWC 1997).
Five minutes of post-partum contact is sufficient for the maternal bond to form which is strong enough towithstand 12 hours of separation (Keyserlingk and Weary 2007). Behavioural indicators of distress include
increased vocalisation and activity, restlessness and sniffing; which naturally would function to reunite the cow
and calf (Flower and Weary 2003, Keyserlingk and Weary 2007, Stehulouá et al. 2008). This immediate
response is seen after separation at birth, but is more intense with later separation as the bond is stronger(Keyserlingk and Weary 2007). Cows separated at 4 days vocalised more, spent less time lying and ruminatedless, compared to separation at birth (Lidfors 1996). Cows and calves showed immediate behavioural
responses to separation at 6 hours, 1 day and 6 days post-partum; but the distress was strongest after the
longer time periods spent together (Weary and Chua 2000). Stehulouá et al. (2008) also found that compared
to separation at 1 day, later separation increased the responses of standing, putting their head outside thepen, vocalising, sniffing the air and sniffing other animals. The response was also more intense when dams
could still see and hear their calf. In addition to time spent together, experience also has an effect, as multiparous cows show a stronger response to separation (Flower and Weary 2003).
It is reported anecdotally that some cows show only a mild response to separation, and therefore are notdistressed. The immediate response is commonly low-amplitude calls with the mouth closed, which are notobvious and are designed to help the calf locate its’ mother (Hopster et al. 1995). After separation, seeing andhearing the calf makes dams become nervous and vocalise more in response to the calf’s calls. However, when
there is no contact between them, sensory information from the calf is lost and the cow may return to feeding,which was taken to suggest separation is not stressful (Hopster et al. 1995). However, this focuses on theimmediate response to distress. Cows are naturally a “hider” species, adapted to long periods of separationfrom their hidden calf while they feed. Therefore there should not be a large response to immediate
separation, as it would attract predators (Flower and Weary 2003). Instead the distress occurs later on, when
the dam expects to be reunited for suckling but cannot find the calf. Research has supported that the distressis delayed and peaks later, 12-24 hours after separation (Marchant-Forde et al. 2002). Flower and Weary(2003) also reported that cows vocalise more 24 hours after separation.

Overall Welfare
The negative effects of separation occur at any stage, as the heart rate of cows increased after separation
irrelevant to the calf’s age or amount of time spent together (Flower and Weary 2003, Stehulouá et al. 2008).
Good welfare is comprised of health and physical wellbeing, but also psychological wellbeing and the ability to
express natural behaviour (OIE 2011). Rearing the calf until natural weaning simultaneously improves cow
health, by reducing the disease risk post-calving; psychological wellbeing, by preventing distress of separation
and allowing positive bonding with the calf and natural behaviour, by expressing maternal behaviour.

Benefits to Dairy Calves
HealthCalves are typically licked by the dam for several hours post-partum. This stimulates calf activity and has
physiological benefits of stimulating breathing, circulation, urination, defecation and drying (Keyserlingk andWeary 2007). The dam increases calf absorption of colostrum Immunoglobulins (Ig’s), essential for passive

www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com

Page 2

February 2013

Information sheet 6

immunity in the first 14 days of life (Penn State 2012), because the dam persuades the calf to stand and suckle
sooner (Flower and Weary 2003). In the first 24 hours ~30% of calves naturally do not suckle and so needguidance to the teat or supplementary colostrum to ensure adequate intake (Flower and Weary 2003).
Separation is also stressful to calves, which could damage their health. A physiological sign which indicates
distress caused by separation from the dam is an increase in heart rate (Marchant-Forde et al. 2002). Calves’heart rates increase rapidly at separation, a change which lasts longer than calves which are handled only
(Stehulouá et al. 2008). Suckling the dam reduces bouts of diarrhoea for 3 weeks, improves digestive function,
prevents the abnormal behaviour of cross-sucking other calves’ navels, as the motivation is satisfied on thedam (Flower and Weary 2003), and improves immunity by exposure to existing pathogens in the herd
(Wagenaar and Langhout 2006).

Behaviour
The natural behaviour of calves is to maintain a strong attachment bond with the dam until natural weaning or
beyond. This attachment involves suckling, but also maintaining close proximity and social contact (Veissier etal. 1990). Calves can recognise their dam 48 hours post-partum, (Marchant-Forde et al. 2002), remain
attracted to the dam for 3-5 weeks after separation (Veissier et al. 1990) and some can recognise the dam 2
years after separation (Wagner et al. 2012). Early separation prevents these experiences and reduces theirwelfare (FAWC 1997). Vocalisation is a behavioural indicator which indicates that separation is stressful(Flower and Weary 2003). When separated by abrupt weaning at several months of age when a strong bondhas formed, Zebu-type calves showed increased locomotion, butting, urination and vocalisation and reduced
grooming, lying and eating (Solano et al. 2007). Suckling, alternatively, induced calmness and reduced anxiety,heart rate, metabolic rate and increased the bonding hormone oxytocin. Rejoining the dam reduced stress andincreased suckling and proximity to the dam (Solano et al. 2007). Finally, there is also evidence separation
distress is also delayed in calves. Marchant-Forde et al. (2002) found that calves were silent at separation andshowed a mild response, but vocalised most 18 hours later, when they expect the dam to return.
The dam improves future calf social behaviour, as calves become less fearful of other calves and adults, andmore sociable (Flower and Weary 2003). Insufficient social contact causes abnormal behaviours and prevents
the opportunity to learn social skills. Suckling improves social activity, learning and interaction, which results inmore complex social behaviour (Flower and Weary 2003). Calves kept with their dam for 7 days also coped
better at the challenge of meeting another calf at 3 weeks, compared to calves separated in 24 hours(Stehulouá et al. 2008). There are long-term benefits, as suckled calves show more maternal behaviour to theirown calf (Flower and Weary 2003). Calves kept with the dam for 12 weeks were less stressed by integration
into the main herd, which typically reduces feeding, grooming, lying and milk yield and increases the stresshormone cortisol (Wagner et al. 2012). Mother-reared heifers coped better, showed more self-grooming andwere submissive to older cows (Wagner et al. 2012). Heifers reared with a foster dam compared to individualhousing were also more socially confident and showed better maternal behaviour (Wagner et al. 2012).

Overall Welfare
Welfare is comprised of physical wellbeing, psychological wellbeing and the ability to express natural
behaviour (OIE 2011). Allowing calves to remain with the dam until natural weaning simultaneously improves
health, by reducing the risk of disease and diarrhoea through improved colostrum intake and licking by thedam; psychological wellbeing, by avoiding the distress of separation and allowing positive bonding experienceswith the dam; and natural behavioural expression, by allowing suckling and improving future social behaviour.

Benefits to Producers
Dairy Cow Productivity

www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com

Page 3

February 2013

Information sheet 6

Repeated stress can damage milk production, and separation at 10 days reduced milk production for 5 days
afterwards (Metz 1987). Suckled cows do not have a reduced overall milk yield, and produce at least as much
milk as separated cows. Suckled cows may have an increased overall milk yield and a higher milk yield as adults
if suckled as a calf, but the results are currently ambiguous (Flower and Weary 2003). Milk yield after suckling
can rebound at weaning, which depending on the time of weaning could bring the total milk yield overlactation to equal that of separated cows (Passille et al. 2008). Cows with restricted suckling (2x/day) had ahigher daily milk yield (at least 14% higher) compared to separated cows (Fröberg et al. 2007). This was for
Holstein-Zebu cows, but has been found in Holsteins too (Bar-Peled et al. 1995). The higher milk yield wassuggested as being due to frequent emptying of the udder and because the calves had restricted access.
Suckled cows, and later their calves, also had reduced mastitis and improved udder health (Fröberg et al.
2007).
Suckling ab-libitum can reduce oxytocin and prolactin release at milking which can suppress milk ejection at
milking, but limiting the frequency of suckling may limit these effects (Passille et al. 2008). The reduction inmilk yield for human consumption from suckling equals the amount the calf drinks. If the calf drinks 20%, 80%of the normal yield is collected at milking (Passille et al. 2008). The calving-conception interval can be shorterin suckling cows, as cows suckled for 10 days had a 66 day interval, compared to 97 days for separated cows
(Flower and Weary 2003). Oestrus inhibition was greater in cows continuously with their calves, than thosesuckled twice a day (Flower and Weary 2003). Finally, maternal care increases through generations of suckling,which provides future benefits to calf health and behaviour (Wagenaar and Langhout 2006).

Dairy Calf Productivity
The main benefit to producers of cow-calf rearing could be improved calf health. Calves with their dam forseveral weeks have higher daily weight gains and increased health and future productivity (Flower and Weary2003). Other effects of suckling including a significantly higher daily weight gain despite similar birth weights,
which is maintained for up to 16 months (3 times higher with 3x/day suckling vs. individually-housed calves fed
5-10% of bodyweight) (Figure 1, Metz 1987, Flower and Weary 2003, Passille et al. 2008); a reduced age of firstcalving and improved future milk production (Passille et al. 2008); a higher potential growth rate and avoiding
a growth check at weaning (Wagenaar and Langhout 2006); improved adaptation to solid feed at weaning(Flower and Weary 2003); and a reduction in abnormal licking behaviour and mortality (Fröberg et al. 2007).
Wagenaar (2009) found rearing method had a significant effect on preweaning growth rate and live weight at
90 day weaning; and suckled calves maintained a higher average live body weight for at least one year (Figure
1).
Figure 1. Live bodyweight (LW) development of calves in different rearing groups over time (Wagenaar
2009, adapted from Wagenaar and Langhout 2007).

www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com

Page 4

February 2013

Information sheet 6

Licking cleans the calf which removes birth membranes and helps prevent infection. The calf drinks more
frequently, has improved digestion and better milk absorption. Daily weight gains can be >1kg/day. Calves also
learn socially from the dam to drink water and eat grass, silage and hay roughage (Wagenaar and Langhout2006). These benefits to calves through suckling from their mother have been described as an “investment in
the future”, by improving the health of the future herd (Wagenaar and Langhout 2006).

Improved Management and Business Ethics
There are potential benefits to management and the business of cow-calf rearing. Management may be easierin some areas, such as avoiding cow-calf separation and reducing labour compared to individually rearing
calves. The practice may also be more socially acceptable for consumers, and therefore a sustainable practicefor the industry (Weary 2012). It can improve the welfare status of both dairy cows and calves. Finally,
producers practicing cow-calf rearing report higher job satisfaction (Wagenaar and Langhout 2006).

Conclusion
Cow-calf rearing until natural weaning provides welfare benefits of health, psychological wellbeing and natural
behavioural expression for both the calf and dam. The investment in the future herd of improved calf health
may also outweigh the reduction in commercial milk yield. Where not possible, benefits of late separation may
outweigh the distress caused, which can be partly mitigated by group housing calves which provides social
benefits, and preventing visual and vocal contact with the dam (Flower and Weary 2003).

References
Bar-Peled, U., Maltz, E., Bruckental, I., Folman, Y., Kali, Y., Gacitua, H. and Lehrer, A.R., (1995) Relationship between frequent
milking or suckling in early lactation and milk production of high producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 78,
2726–2736.
de Passille, A. M. B. P., G. Marnet, H. Lapierre, and J. Rushen. (2008) Effects of twice-daily nursing on milk ejection and milk yield
during nursing and milking in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 1416–1422.
FAWC, Farm Animal Welfare Council (1997) Report on the welfare of dairy cattle. Tolworth/Surbiton, Surrey, UK, 96 pages.
Flower, F.C., Weary, D.M. (2003) The effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. Animal Welfare, 12, 3, 339-348.
Froberg, S., Aspegren-Guldorff, A., Olsson, I. Marin, B., Berg, C., Hernandez, C., Galina, C. S., Lidfors, L., Svennersten-Sjaunja, K.
(2007) Effect of restricted suckling on milk yield, milk composition and udder health in cows and behaviour and weightgain in calves, in dual-purpose cattle in the tropics. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 39, 1, 71-81.
Hopster, H., O'Connell, J.M., Blokhuis, H.J. (1995) Acute effects of cow-calf separation on heart rate, plasma cortisol and behaviour
in multiparous dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 44, 1, 1-8.
Lidfors, L. (1996) Behavioural effects of separating the dairy calf immediately or 4 days post-partum. Applied Animal Behaviour
Science, 49, 269-283.
Marchant-Forde, J.N., Marchant-Forde, R.M.,Weary, D.M., (2002). Responses of dairy cows and calves to each other's
vocalizations after early separation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78, 19–28.
Metz, J. (1987) Productivity aspects of keeping dairy cow and calf together in the post-partum period. Livestock Production
Science, 16, 4, 385-394
OIE, World Organisation for Animal Health (2011) Terrestrial Animal Health Code: Chapter 7.1 Introduction to therecommendations for animal welfare (Article 7.1.1) Available at:<http://www.oie.int/index.php?id=169&L=0&htmfile=chapitre_1.7.1.htm.> Accessed 10/12/12.
Penn State (2012). Available at <www.Calfcare.ca.> Accessed 31/10/12.
Ruckebusch, Y. (1975) Feeding and sleep patterns of cows prior to and post parturition. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 1, 283292.
Sandem, A.-I., Braastad, B.O. (2005) Effects of cow–calf separation on visible eye white and behaviour in dairy cows—A briefreport. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 95, 3–4, 233-239.
Solano, J., Orihuela, A., Galina, C.S., Aguirre, V. (2007) A note on behavioral responses to brief cow–calf separation and reunion in
cattle (Bos indicus). Journal of Veterinary Behaviour, 2, 10–14.
Stehulouá I., Lidfors, L., Špinka, M. (2008) Responses of dairy cows and calves to early separation: Effect of calf age and visual andauditory contact after separation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 110, 144–165.
Veissier, I., Le neindre, P., Garel, J.P. (1990) Decrease in cow-calf attachment after weaning. Behavioural Processes, 21, 2–3, 95105.

www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com

Page 5

February 2013

Information sheet 6

Ventura, B.A., von Keyserlingk, M.A., Schluppi, C.A., Weary, D.M. (2013) Views on contentious practices in dairy farming: The caseof early cow-calf separation. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 6105-16.
Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., Weary, D.M. (2007) Maternal behavior in cattle. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 1, 106-113.
Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., Weary, D. (2012) Welfare Implications of dairy cattle housing management. The First Dairy Cattle Welfare
Symposium, 23-26 October 2012, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Wagenaar, J.P., Langhout, L. (2006) Kalveren bij de koe De natuur werkt. Lois Bolk Institute, Denmark. 12 pages.
Wagenaar, J.P (2009) Happy Dutch organic calves: Suckling systems in organic dairying in the Netherlands. National Veterinary
Institute’s Report Series 14. Calf welfare in organic herds - planning for the future, 17-22.
Wagenaar, J.P, Langhout, J. (2007) Practical implications of increasing ‘natural living’ through suckling systems in organic dairy calf
rearing. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Systems 54, 375-386.
Wagner, K., Barth, K., Palme, R., Futschik, A., Waiblinger, S.(2012) Integration into the dairy cow herd: Long-term effects of mothercontact during the first twelve weeks of life. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 141, 3–4, 117-129.
Weary, D.M., Chua, B. (2000) Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. 1. Separation at 6 h, 1 day and 4 days after
birth. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 69, 177–188.
Weary, D. (2012) Attitudes to Contentious Practices in Dairy Farming. The First Dairy Cattle Welfare Symposium. 23-26 October
2012, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com

Page 6