NEWS RELEASE
23-D-1146

November 28, 2023
Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. (JCR) publicly disclose a second-party opinion on Sustainability-Linked Finance Framework andGreen Finance Framework Evaluation Results.

Mori Building Co., Ltd.
Assignment

Sustainable Finance Framework< Confirmation of meeting the requirements of the Sustainability-Linked Bond
Principles and the Sustainability-Linked Loan Principles >This framework meets Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles
and Sustainability-Linked Loan Principles.
<Green Finance Framework Evaluation Results>

Overall evaluation

Greenness Evaluation(Use of Proceeds)

Management,
Operation andTransparent Evaluation

Green 1(F)g1 (F)

m1 (F)

Issuer/Borrower

Mori Building Co., Ltd.

Subject

Mori Building Co., Ltd.
Sustainable Finance Framework

1/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation Overview▶▶▶1. Overview of Mori Building Co., Ltd.
Mori Building Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred as "the Company" or "Mori Building") is a general developer
company established in 1959, following the foundation of its predecessor, Mori Fudosan, in 1955. Since
the establishment, its core business has been the leasing and management of office buildings primarilyin Tokyo's Minato Ward, but it began to diversify its business around 1975, entering the commercial
facilities market with the opening of Laforet Harajuku in 1978. After the completion of ARK Hills in 1986,
Mori Building has promoted complex urban redevelopment projects involving office, residential,commercial, cultural facilities, etc. The Company has also entered the overseas market since 1994. In
recent years, with the opening of Roppongi Hills, Mori Building has expanded into the cultural, hotel, andurban development consulting businesses in addition to building leasing business.

▶▶▶2. ESG management and sustainability initiatives
Mori Building has a policy that has been formed through the process of consistently working on city andurban development, which was the first large-scale urban redevelopment project by the private sector,
and positions "Create Cities, Nurture Cities" as a philosophy of urban development, "Vertical Garden
City" as an ideal city model and development method, and "Environment and Greenery," "Safety andSecurity" and "Culture and Art" as a mission and important theme for urban development. In the"Environment and Greenery," the Company has established "harmonious coexistence of cities andnature," "decarbonized cities" and "resource recycling" as its environmental policy through "urban design
and its management" with the ideal of "Vertical Garden City," and it is working on "Regulatory Complianceand Environmental Management," "Environmental Information Disclosure" and "Environmental
Education and Awareness-raising Activities" in order to promote this policy.
Mori Building recognizes that the promotion of sustainability initiatives is a material matter related to the
execution of its business operations, and has therefore established the Sustainability Committee, chairedby the President and CEO, and its subcommittees, the Environmental Promotion Committee and theCommittee on Human Rights and Societal Issues.

▶▶▶3. Alignment Evaluation with Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles, etc.
This second-party opinion confirmed the alignment with Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles 1 ,Sustainability Linked-Loan Principles 2 , Sustainability-Linked Bond Guidelines 3 and SustainabilityLinked Loan Guidelines4 (collectively referred to as "SLBP and so on") is confirmed in case of financing
general corporate purpose instruments from Sustainable Finance Framework formulated by Mori
Building. Japan Credit Rating Agency, Inc. (JCR) confirmed the Company's sustainability strategy, key————————————
1

International Capital Market Association (ICMA). Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles 2023.
(Https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2023-updates/Sustainability-Linked-Bond-Principles-June2023-220623.pdf)
2
Asia Pacific Loan Market Association (APLMA), Loan Market Association (LMA), Loan Syndications and Trading Association(LSTA). Sustainability-Linked Loan Principles 2023. (https://www.lsta.org/content/sustainability-linked-loan-principles-sllp/)
3
Ministry of the Environment Sustainability Link Loan Guidelines 2022 (https://www.env.go.jp/content/000062495.pdf)
4
Ministry of the Environment Sustainability Link Bond Guidelines 2022 (https://www.env.go.jp/content/000062495.pdf)
2/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

performance indicators (KPI), sustainability performance targets (SPT), characteristics, reporting andverification as defined in this framework as an independent third-party organization in order to ensure
the transparency and objectivity of the evaluation recommended by SLBP and so on.
Mori Building set SPT after selecting the following KPI in this framework.
Chart 1: KPI and SPT in this framework5

KPI 1

KPI 2
KPI 3
KPI 4

GHG emission reduction rate in
Scope 1 and 2

Renewable energy consumption
rateGreen coverage ratio in largescale mixed-use development
areas
CDP evaluation (Climate Change)

SPT 1

GHG emission reduction rate in Scope 1 and 2
consistent with the following targets (Base Year: FY
2019)
・▲50% by FY 2030
・Net-zero by FY 2050
The reduction rate for each year shall meet theannual reduction rate required by the SBT 1.5℃
standard target.

SPT 2

100% renewable energy ratio by FY 2030

SPT 3

38% green coverage in large-scale mixed-use
development areas by FY 2030

SPT 4

Obtained an A- or better rating in CDP (Climate
Change)KPI and SPT set by Mori Building in this framework contribute to "Environment and Greenery" among thethree key themes and are meaningful in line with the characteristics of the real estate industry. JCR
evaluated the SPT is an ambitious setting compared to the Company's record of achievement or peers.
JCR confirmed it is agreed that financial characteristics shall be changed depending upon the achievementof SPT as characteristics of sustainability-linked bonds (hereinafter referred to as SLB) and sustainabilitylinked loans (hereinafter referred to as SLL) (hereinafter collectively referred to as sustainability-linked
finance) financed based on this framework. JCR confirmed that the setting of interlocking methods withfinancial characteristics according to the SPT achievement and the contents of reporting after the
implementation are also appropriately planned.
JCR confirmed that this framework is aligned with SLBP and so on.

▶▶▶4. Overview of Green Finance Framework Evaluation
This Green Finance Framework Evaluation evaluates whether the Sustainable Finance Framework
formulated by Mori Building align with Green Bond Principles, Green Loan Principles, Green Bond
Guidelines, and Green Loan Guidelines in case of financing Use of Proceeds bond. Since these are
principles or guidelines and not regulations, they are non-binding; however, JCR evaluate them byreferring to the principles and guidelines as a unified standard domestically and internationally.
Mori Building considered that its eligible projects are (1) green building and (2) renewable energy as
green projects among the use of proceeds in this framework. In cases of implementing eligible projects,————————————
5

Created by JCR based on this framework

3/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

the Company has stipulated that appropriate measures should consider negative impacts on theenvironment and society. Based on the aforementioned, JCR evaluate that the use of proceeds in thisframework is expected to have environmental benefits.
Deciding the selection criteria and the evaluation processes is appropriately carried out, with the
involvement of management. Fund management will be conducted based on clear regulations. The
contents of these processes, disclosing and reporting on the fund management is also appropriate, andJCR evaluates that the transparency is high. Based on the above, JCR evaluates that the management
and operation system in Mori Building has been established and has transparency.
Consequently, JCR assigned "g1(F)" for "Greenness Evaluation (Use of Proceeds) and "m1(F)" for"Management, Operation and Transparency Evaluation" regarding this framework based on JCR Green
Finance Evaluation Methodology. Accordingly, JCR assigned "Green 1(F)" for "JCR Finance Framework
Evaluation." This framework is considered to meet the standards for the items required in Green Bond
Principles, Green Loan Principles, Green Bond Guidelines and Green Loan Guidelines.

4/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Alignment with the Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles, etc.
1. Sustainability Strategy of Mori Building
2. Selection of KPI
3. Measurement of SPT
4. Characteristics of bonds / loans
5. Reporting / verification
6. Conclusion on suitability for SLBP, etc.

Chapter 2: Green Finance Framework Assessment■ Evaluation Phase 1: Greenness Evaluation
I. Use of Proceeds
JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
Current Status of Evaluation Target and JCR’s evaluation
1. About the greenness of the project(1) About the environmental improvement effect of the use of proceeds
2. Negative impact on the Environment and Society
3. Consistency with SDGs

■ Evaluation Phase 2: Management / Operation / Transparency Evaluation
I. Selection Standards and Processes for Use of Proceeds
JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
Current Status of Evaluation Target and JCR’s evaluation
1. Goals
2. Selection criteria
3. Processes
II. Management of the Proceeds
JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
Current Status of Evaluation Target and JCR’s evaluation
III. Reporting
JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
Current Status of Evaluation Target and JCR’s evaluation
IV. Organizational sustainability initiatives
JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
Current Status of Evaluation Target and JCR’s evaluation■ Evaluation Phase 3: Evaluation result (Conclusion)

5/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Chapter 1: Alignment with the Sustainability-Linked Bond
Principles, etc.
1. Sustainability Strategy of Mori Building

Business overview
Mori Building is a general developer company established in 1959, following the foundation of its
predecessor, Mori Fudosan, in 1955. Since the establishment, its core business has been the leasing
and management of office buildings primarily in Tokyo's Minato Ward, but it began to diversify its
business around 1975, entering the commercial facilities market with the opening of Laforet Harajuku in
1978. After the completion of ARK Hills in 1986, Mori Building has promoted complex urban
redevelopment projects involving office, residential, commercial, cultural facilities, etc. The Company has
also entered the overseas market since 1994. In recent years, with the opening of Roppongi Hills, Mori
Building has expanded into the cultural, hotel, and urban development consulting businesses in addition
to building leasing business.

Policy / Philosophy / Management Plan
Mori Building has a policy that has been formed through the process of consistently working on city andurban development, which was the first large-scale urban redevelopment project by the private sector,
and positions "Create Cities, Nurture Cities" as a philosophy of urban development, "Vertical Garden City
" as an ideal city model and development method, and "Environment and Greenery," "Safety and Security"and "Culture and Art" as a mission and important theme for urban development.
"Vertical Garden City", an ideal urban model held out by Mori Building, is a compact complex thatvertically layers diverse urban functions including work, residence, recreation, commerce, education, andrelaxation, which are highly integrated walking distances. By aggregating subdivided small plots of land
into a large floor plate and build high-rise buildings, the ground level can be freed up for wide-open
green spaces to nurture the environment. This not only fosters urban nature and achieves living where
people can experience the four seasons, but also mitigates the heat island phenomenon by covering
ground surfaces and rooftops with greenery. The aggregation of diverse urban functions also brings about
a leveling of energy demand and enhancing energy efficiency. The Company considers that a compact
city where work and residence are in close proximity greatly reduces the time and energy required forcommuting to work or school and it also has positive effects on resource recycling and efficiency of
distribution. Moreover, making high-level use of urban centers in this form aids in the protection of naturein suburbs. Mori Building considers Vertical Garden City is a new urban model that aims for the
harmonious coexistence of cities and nature while constraining impacts on the global environment.

6/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Chart 2: Image of gradual development of Mori Building Vertical Garden City6

Key Theme and Goal
Mori Building has been working on sustainable urban development together with the local community inthe way of urban redevelopment projects even before the words "ESG" and "SDGs" came into the
spotlight. Under the philosophy of "Create Cities, Nurture Cities," the Company is dedicated to realizing
sustainable society, developing local communities, and contributing to the safety, health, and happinessof people and working on projects that contribute to the realization of a sustainable society, thedevelopment of the region, and the safety, health, and well-being of people. Among which, the three key
themes are “Environment and Greenery”, ”Safety and Security” and “Culture and Art.”

Chart 3: Three themes of Mori Building urban development7————————————
6

Mori Building Website https://www.mori.co.jp/urban̲design/vision.html

7Mori Building From the full-year financial report for the fiscal year ending March 2023

https://www.mori.co.jp/en/company/ir/pdf/investors2022.pdf

7/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

In "Environment and Greenery," the Company has established its environmental policy: "harmonious
coexistence of cities and nature," "decarbonized cities" and "resource recycling" as based on "urban
design and its management" with the ideal of "Vertical Garden City," and it is working on " Regulatory
ComplianceandEnvironmental

Management,""Environmental

Information

Disclosure"and"Environmental Education and Awareness-raising Activities" in order to promote these policies.
In "Safety and Security," based on the concept of "cities to escape to, rather than flee from in times ofdisaster," the Company has implemented hardware measures such as the introduction of the highest
level of anti-seismic performance in its main buildings and the independent power supply from its energy
plant, as exemplified by Roppongi Hills. In addition, Mori Building has implemented both hardware andsoftware measures, such as periodic earthquake preparedness training for all employees and theestablishment of several staff housing units for disaster readiness in its business areas to prepare asystem (approximately 240 disaster response personnel) that can respond in case of an emergency. Mori
Building has introduced a system in which employees themselves act as a human sensors to identify
near-misses during normal time through support crew activities in which they participate, and theCompany has been continuously implementing this system. With the Safety Office permanently in place,
the Company also has a system in place to promote safety and security initiatives.
In "Culture and Art," the Company has "Suntory Hall," which opened in Ark Hills in 1986, "Mori Art
Museum," which opened in 2003 as a symbol of the cultural heart of Tokyo, Roppongi Hills, and recently,"TOKYO NODE," which opened in Toranomon Hills Station Tower in 2023, "Mori Building Digital Art
Museum: Epson teamLab Borderless," which will relocate from Odaiba to Azabudai Hills, has developed
various facilities. By not only holding exhibitions and learning programs at the Mori Art Museum but also
actively organizing the "Roppongi Art Night" art event throughout the town of Roppongi and installing
public art on the grounds of major projects, the Company is promoting activities based on the conceptof "Art + Life" and working to realize a rich society where more people can enjoy art and culture closeat hand.
Chart 4 shows a summary of the Company's policies and initiatives on sustainability by ESG category,as described above.

8/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Chart 4: Sustainability Initiatives (by ESG Category)7

Sustainability Management System
Mori Building recognizes that the promotion of sustainability initiatives is a material matter related to the
execution of its business operations, and has therefore established the Sustainability Committee, which
is chaired by the President and CEO, and its subordinate committees, the Environmental Promotion
Committee and the Committee on Human Rights and Societal Issues.
The Sustainability Committee deliberates on important sustainability-related issues such as climatechange, human rights, and supply chain management and supervises and monitors subordinate
committees. Specific activities and studies are carried out mainly by the Sustainability Promotion
Committee Secretariat, which was established under the Committee and is headed by the executive
officer in charge. In addition, the Board of Directors receives reports from the Sustainability Committee
regularly and manages and supervises important matters through discussion by the Board of Directors.
The Environmental Promotion Committee, chaired by the director in charge of the Environment
Promotion Department, is held once a quarter. The Committee promotes and manages cross-sectional
efforts to address various environmental issues, including climate change, and reports regularly to the
Sustainability Committee. The Sustainability Committee discusses essential matters such as formulating
policies to address climate-related risks and opportunities and establishing greenhouse gas (GHG)
9/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

emissions targets. The Environmental Promotion Committee is responsible for reporting and discussing
important matters and implementing approved policies and plans, including identifying, assessing, andmanaging risks and opportunities.
The Committee on Human Rights and Societal Issues, chaired by the director in charge of the Human
Resources Department, promotes and manages human rights and supply chain management initiatives
and reports regularly to the Sustainability Committee. The Committee also publishes the Mori Building
Group Human Rights Policy and the Mori Building Group Sustainable Procurement Guidelines to clarify
its responses/policies on human rights and supply chain management.

Chart 5: Sustainability Management System8————————————
8

Mori Building Website https://www.mori.co.jp/sustainability/promotion̲system/

10/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

2. Selection of KPI

2-1. JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
In this section, JCR will confirm whether the KPIs in this framework are relevant, core and important in
the entire business of Mori Building, whether the strategic meanings of its business operations are ofgreat significance now and future, whether it is possible to measure and quantify based on a consistentmethodology, whether it is possible to benchmark, and whether the definition is clarified, including thescope of application.

2-2. Overview of KPI selection and evaluation of significance by JCR▶▶▶ Evaluation results
The KPI in this framework meet all the conditions to be fulfilled shown in SLBP and so on.

2-2-1. Overview of KPI selection
In this framework of Mori Building, KPI is set as follows:
Chart 6: KPI in this Framework9

GHG emission reduction rate in Scope 1 and 2
KPI 1<Definition>
A calculation of the reduction rate from FY2019 based on the total GHG emissions of Scope 1 and
2, calculated in accordance with the GHG Protocol, covering Mori Building and its consolidated
subsidiaries.

Renewable energy consumption rate
KPI 2

<Definition>
Percentage of electricity consumption by the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries that is
generated from renewable energy sources.

Green coverage ratio in large-scale mixed-use development areas

KPI 3<Definition>
Measure green coverage in major large-scale mixed-use development areas.Note Green cover ratio(= green area / site area x 100%): In accordance with the Tokyo Metropolitan Government
Municipal Green Coverage Ratio Manual, we use aerial photographs as the basis for calculations.
N o t e ) A R K H i l l s , A R K H i l l s S e n g o k u y a m a M o r i To w e r, A R K H i l l s S o u t h To w e r, A t a g oGreen Hills, Mo to azabu Hills , Ho lland Hills, Omo tes ando Hills, Roppon gi Hills,
To r a n o m o n H i l l s M o r i To w e r, To r a n o m o n H i l l s B u s i n e s s To w e r ( C o m p l e t e d b y
2 0 2 1 ) , To r a n o m o n H i l l s R e s i d e n t i a l To w e r ( C o m p l e t e d i n 2 0 2 2 ) , To r a n o m o n H i l l s
S t a t i o n To w e r ( C o m p l e t e d i n 2 0 2 3 ) , A z a b u d a i H i l l s ( C o m p l e t e d i n 2 0 2 3 )————————————
9Created by JCR based on hearings with this framework and Mori Building

11/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

CDP evaluation (climate change)
KPI 4<Definition>
Scores related to climate change as evaluated by CDP

KPI1, KPI2, and KPI4 are related to climate change (decarbonization and low carbon), and KPI3 is related
to harmony with nature and biodiversity.

2-2-2. Industry characteristics, important issues
Mori Building belongs to the real estate industry, and there is the Real Estate Companies
Association(RECAJ) of Japan as a Japanese industry association. RECAJ and Japan Building Owners &Managers Association(JBOMA) have listed "a decarbonized society," "a society in harmony with nature,"and "a resilient society" as the directions that the real estate industry should aim for toward 2050. Theylisted "Changes in required value" as an influential trend. They recognize contributions related todecarbonization and harmony with nature as important.10

Chart 7: Four topics to consider as Japanese real estate industry towards 205010 (JCR translation)————————————
10

RECAJ / JBAMA: Long-term vision for realizing a decarbonized society in the real estate industry
https://www.fdk.or.jp/f̲suggestion/pdf/kankyou̲jikkou̲tyoki̲2̲2104.pdf
12/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

In terms of climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, Japanese real estate industry is involvedin the "Commercial and other" and "Residential" of Japan's total GHG emissions, accounting for 32.6% of
the total. Therefore, Japanese real estate industry has a big responsibility in reducing GHG emissions inJapan.
CO2 emissions originatedfrom non-energy
7.1%

EnergyTransformation
7.9%

Industry
35.1%
Residential
14.7%

Commercial
and other
17.9%

Transport
17.4%

Chart 8: Japanese GHG emissions in FY2021 (after electricity and heat allocation)11————————————
11

Ministry of the Environment https://www.env.go.jp/content/000128749.pdf
13/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

2-2-3. Evaluation of JCR for KPI
KPI1: GHG emission reduction rate in Scopes 1 and 2
Mori Building has set "Environment and Greenery" as one of the three key themes, and has set"decarbonized cities" in its environmental policy. Mori Building believes that its social mission is to reduceenergy consumption, reduce GHG emissions, and work on decarbonization in urban development andcity management.
Therefore, Mori Building has set a net zero target by 2050, as well as a 50% reduction in scopes 1 and
2 in 2030 (compared to FY2019), and a 30% reduction in scope 3 (compared to FY2019) as a GHG
reduction target from global (domestic and overseas) business activities in its consolidated group. Thesetargets have already been certified by the SBTi (Science Based Targets initiative) as a "1.5℃ level(scientific-based reduction target to limit temperature rise to within 1.5℃ of pre-industrial levels)".

Chart 9: Mori Building Group GHG Emissions in FY2019 and 2050/2030 Targets12

The KPI1 is important in light of the GHG emissions of Japan and the characteristics of Japanese realestate industry. KPI1 is also positioned as important in Mori Building's strategy and policy, so JCR
evaluates that KPI1 is significant. And, JCR has confirmed that KPI1 can be measured, quantified andbenchmarked based on a consistent methodology.
KPI2: Renewable energy consumption rate
As mentioned above, Mori Building has set "decarbonized cities" in its environmental policy, and has set
net zero targets for 2050 and targets for 2030. To achieve the above goals, Mori Building joined theinternational initiative RE100 and committed to the goal of meeting 100% of its electricity consumption
in its business activities from renewable energy sources by 2030.
————————————
12

Mori Building Website https://www.mori.co.jp/en/sustainability/environment/climate̲change.html

14/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

KPI2 is important in light of the characteristics of Japanese real estate industry, and is positioned asimportant in Mori Building's strategy and policy. JCR evaluates that KPI2 is significant. JCR has confirmedthat KPI2 can be measured, quantified and benchmarked based on a consistent methodology.
KPI3: Green coverage ratio in large-scale mixed-use development areas
Most of Mori Building's projects are located in Minato Ward, Tokyo. The Mori Building positions the ARK
Hills area, Roppongi Hills area, and Toranomon Hills area as "strategic areas."

Chart 10: Mori Building Strategic Area13

Minato Ward is located in the center of the metropolitan area. Minato Ward is expected to promotesecuring green spaces and water surfaces in order to mitigate the environmental impact of the city, andto grow urban greenery as a symbol of the capital.14
Since the completion of ARK Hills in 1986, Mori Building has been actively working on urban greening
to realize the ideal city covered with greenery and coexisting with nature harmoniously. Mori Building
names the mixed-use development property based on the urban development philosophy "Vertical
Garden City" as "Hills." The properties named “Hills'” are Mori Building's flagship projects. Mori Building
has been involved in everything from the planning stage to management/operation stage, and is involved————————————
13
14

Mori Building Website https://www.mori.co.jp/en/projects/

Minato-ku, Tokyo Green and Water Comprehensive Plan https://www.city.minato.tokyo.jp/sougoukeikaku/kankyomachi/toshikekaku/kekaku/documents/midorimizu̲honpen̲1.pdf

15/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

in green space planning and planting management plan. JCR confirmed that the site area of "large-scale
mixed-use development area" currently cover more than 80% of the group’s site area, and will coverabout 95% of the group in the future.
The KPI3 is important in light of the characteristics of Japanese real estate industry and the policy of thegovernment, and is positioned as important in the strategy and policy of Mori Building. JCR evaluatesthat KPI2 is significant. JCR has confirmed that KPI3 can be measured, quantified, and benchmarked
based on a consistent methodology (Tokyo Metropolitan Green Coverage Standard Survey Manual).

KPI4: CDP evaluation (climate change)
The CDP evaluation (climate change) is managed by CDP, a non-profit organization founded in London
in 2000. CDP is also involved in the management of international initiatives such as the SBTi and RE100.
In 2022, more than 680 investors have signed up to CDP, and the total investment management of thesignatory investors is more than 130 trillion dollars. In 2022, more than 18,600 companies responded to
the CDP evaluation (climate change). The CDP evaluation (climate change) is a global standard forclimate change reporting and information disclosure in the world. As shown in Exhibit 11, the structureof the CDP evaluation (climate change) questionnaire covers a number of items, including governance,risks and opportunities, strategy, targets and performance, and emissions. The structure of the CDP
evaluation (climate change) is also consistent with TCFD requirements.15

Chart 11: Structure of the CDP Assessment (Climate Change) 2023 Questionnaire(Full Version/General Sector)16 –JCR translation-————————————
15

CDP release https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/comfy/cms/files/files/000/005/753/original/Release̲JP̲20220314.pdf

16

CDP material https://cdn.cdp.net/cdpproduction/comfy/cms/files/files/000/007/920/original/2023̲CC%E5%B0%8E%E5%85%A5%E7%B7%A8.pdf

16/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Mori Building will promote consideration of risks/opportunities, business strategies, targets, third-party
verification of GHG emissions, and introduction of renewable energy by working to improve CDP
evaluation (climate change). And, Mori Building will share an objective evaluation by CDP, an
independent third party, with investors and other stakeholders.
Based on the above, JCR evaluates that KPI4 is significant because it meets the expectations ofstakeholders and contributes to Mori Building's environmental policy "decarbonized cities". JCR has
confirmed that KPI4 can be measured, quantified, and benchmarked based on a consistent methodology.
Based on the above, JCR evaluates that all of the KPIs set by Mori Building meet all of the conditions in
SLBP, etc.

17/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

3. Measurement of SPT

3-1. Evaluation perspective
In this section, JCR will confirm whether the SPT of this framework is ambitious, such as exceeding the
trajectory of Business as Usual (BAU), representing important improvements in the selected KPIs, orwhether it is based on benchmarks such as Mori Building's past year results, other companies in the same
industry, industry standards, science, etc., and whether the schedule for achieving the target will be
disclosed.

3-2. Outline of SPT measurement and evaluation by JCR▶▶▶ Evaluation results
The SPT of this framework meets all the conditions to be provided shown in SLBP etc.

Mori Building has set the following SPTs in this framework. The company adopts one of the following
KPIs and SPTs when it procures sustainability link finance. The company will specifically identify KPIs
and SPTs to be adopted in SLB's statutory disclosure documents (correction issuance registration
documents, issuance registration supplementary documents, etc.) or SLL contracts. The company will
disclose the SPT to be adopted in the materials for investors when it procure SLB and will explain directly
to the render when it procure SLL. The annual SPT will be determined as necessary at the time of eachfinancing transaction. The annual SPT will be determined as necessary at the time of each financing
transaction.
Chart 12: SPT in this Framework17

GHG emission reduction rate in Scopes 1 and 2 consistent with the following targets (Base year:
FY2019)SPT 1

・▲50% by FY2030
・Net zero by FY2050
The reduction rate for each year shall meet the annual reduction rate required by the target of the
SBT 1.5℃ standard target.

SPT 2

100% renewable energy ratio by FY 2030

SPT 3

38% green coverage in large-scale mixed-use development areas by FY2030

SPT 4

Obtained an A- or better rating in CDP (Climate Change)————————————
17

This framework

18/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

i. Analysis of track records
Track records and targets of each SPT are shown in the table below.
Chart 13: Track record of each SPT and targets for 203018

unit

SPT1
SPT2
SPT3
SPT4

GHG emission reduction ratein Scope1 and 2(Base year : FY2019)
Renewable energy(electricity) rate
Green coverage rate inlarge-scale mixed-use
development areas
CDP (climate change)

Achievements (year)

Target year

FY2019FY2020

FY2021

FY2022

FY2030

25.6

24.1

22.0

20.7

12.8

-

6.0%

14.1%

19.1%

50%

%

1.3%

2.0%

2.4%

18.1%.

100%

%

-

37.3%

37.1 %

37.9%

38.0%

-

-

-

-

A-

A- or
better

10,000 tCO2
Reduction
rate (%)

・ SPT1: Compared to 256,000 tCO2 in FY2019, the Company emitted 219,000 tCO2 in FY2021, andreduced by more than 14%. The factors are reduction of energy consumption due to a decreasein the attendance rate during the coronavirus pandemic and a decrease in emission factors in
China. In addition, the amount of real estate owned by the Company has not increased. In the
future, the Company plans to increase its real estate holdings through new development, andits energy consumption will increase due to the recovery from the pandemic. Under suchcircumstances, the Company will reduce CO2 emissions by 50% (corresponding to a 4.5%
annual reduction) by 2030 to achieve SPT1. Each year's target meets the requirement of the
SBT 1.5℃. Therefore, the Company will make more than BAU reduction efforts toward 2030.
Based on the above, JCR evaluates that SPT1 is ambitious.

・ SPT2: The Company's performance from 2019 to 2021 is around 2.0%. This Company will rise to100% in the next eight years to achieve SPT2. In addition, the Company joined the international
initiative RE100. The Company must plan to secure and procure additional renewable energy.
Based on the above, JCR evaluates that SPT2 is ambitious.19

・ SPT3: The Company's performance from 2019 to 2021 is around 37.0%. In the future, the Company
will increase its real estate holdings and at the same time increase the green coverage rate to38.0%. In order to achieve SPT3, it is necessary not only to install new green spaces in newreal estate, but also to maintain and expand the green spaces in existing real estate. Basedon the above, JCR evaluates that SPT3 is ambitious.

————————————
18

Created by JCR from materials provided by Mori Building
Additionality means that it has the effect of promoting the increase of new renewable energy facilities. Under RE100, it is limited to
procurement (including certificates) from power generation facilities within 15 years after the start of operation.
19

19/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

・ SPT4: The Company didn’t respond to CDP before 2021 as it is a private company. The Company
responded for the first time in FY2022 and received A- rating. In order to receive CDP A-, theCompany must promote various efforts related to climate change while the evaluation criteria
are updated. The Company will make various efforts in the future. Based on the above, JCR
evaluates that SPT4 is ambitious.

ii. Science-based scenarios, benchmarking approaches and comparison with peers
・ SPT1: This SPT was certified by the SBT initiative as science-based target at the 1.5℃ level. In
Japan where Mori Building mainly operates, SPT1 (4.5% decrease in annual rate) is a moreaggressive target than Japanese government's benchmark target of "46% reduction in FY2030
compared to FY2013 (2.7% decrease in annual rate),". Compared to other companies in thesame industry, the Company set an industry-leading target. JCR evaluates that SPT1 isambitious.

・ SPT2: The benchmark is the 2030 mix (ambitious outlook) of the 6th Strategic Energy Plan, which
was approved by the Cabinet in October 2021, with 36% to 38% renewable energy powersource composition. Compared to the benchmark, SPT2 is more aggressive.
SPT2 is more aggressive compared to the criteria for membership in the international initiative
RE100 (60% in 2030). Compared to other companies in the same industry, there are a few
companies that have more ambitious goals than SPT2, but not many. JCR evaluates that SPT2
is ambitious.

・ SPT3: Most of the real estate owned by Mori Building is located in Minato Ward, Tokyo. The green
coverage rate in Minato Ward, Tokyo is 22.62%, which is a relatively high figure in Tokyo.
Comparing this as a benchmark, SPT3 is larger and more aggressive. Compared to othercompanies in the same Japanese industry, there are no companies that have announced thesame goals as Mori Building. JCR evaluates that SPT3 is ambitious.

・ SPT4: CDP is one of the governing bodies of the SBTi, and the evaluation of the CDP score (climatechange) also incorporates SBTi evaluation indicators. Therefore, JCR evaluates that the CDP
score (climate change) contains a certain scientific basis. In CDP (Climate Change) 2022, only
196 companies out of 1,101 received a rating of A- or higher. JCR has evaluated that A- rating
is difficult for companies. Considering that the evaluation criteria of CDP are updated
frequently, JCR evaluates that SPT4 is ambitious.

Based on the above, JCR evaluates that all SPTs in this framework are ambitious.

20/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

iii. Efforts to achieve SPTs
・ SPT1: The results of Scope 1 and 2 in the base year (FY2019) of Mori Building are as follows.

37%

Scope1
Scope263%

Chart 14: Mori Building Scope1 and 2 CO2 emissions breakdown (FY2019)20

Toward the target year of 2030, the Company plans to aim for ZEB / ZEH standards for newbuildings, and promote the introduction of energy-saving technology, high-efficiency
equipment, and renewable energy in existing buildings. As mentioned above, Scope 2 accounts
for 63% of the CO2 emissions of the Mori Building as a whole, so the introduction of renewableelectricity is expected to be a particularly effective measure.

・SPT2: The Company is a member of the international initiative RE100. Based on the requirements ofRE100, the Company plans to build a well-balanced renewable energy procurement portfolio
by promoting "securing additional renewable energy" through PPA (Power Purchase
Agreement), etc. without relying on "procurement by non-fossil certificates" too much for thetarget year 2030. The Company plans to increase the rate of renewable energy in all Mori
Building-managed properties.

・ SPT3: In existing properties, the Company plans to continue the planting management system
including arborists, and work on confirming the health condition of planting and efficientmaintenance.
In future redevelopment properties, based on the development philosophy of Vertical Garden
City, the Company will secure a sufficient greening area from the planning stage. In the planting
plan, the Company will create a layout plan while taking into account the growing environmentof each tree species.

・ SPT4: The evaluation criteria of CDP will be updated frequently, in consideration of global trends.
Therefore, the Company needs to promote various efforts related to climate change (strategy,risks/opportunities, planning and management of numerical targets, promotion of reduction
measures, etc.) The Company will regularly identify issues related to score improvement, report,
share, and deliberate on the Environmental Promotion Committee, and then make efforts toimprove the overall disclosure of information on climate change.

————————————
20

Created by JCR from materials provided by Mori Building

21/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

3-3. Impact evaluation by JCR
JCR confirmed the increase in positive impacts and the degree of avoidance, management and reductionof negative impacts related to SPT in this framework in accordance with the five elements of the impact
evaluation criteria (diversity, effectiveness, efficiency, multiplier, and additivity) exemplified in the fourthprinciple of the Positive Impact Finance Principles formulated by the United Nations Environment
Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI).
Diversity: Will diverse positive impacts be brought about (impacts defined by UNEP FI, businesssegments, countries/regions, value chains, etc.)?
The SPTs of this framework will have an impact on "climate stability", "biodiversity and healthy
ecosystems", etc. among the impact areas / topics specified by UNEP FI as follows.
Personality and people

Disputes

Modern Slavery

security

Data Privacy

natural disasterchild labour

Health and safety

Society

Availability, accessibility,

Water

Food

residence

Medical & Sanitation

affordability and quality of

Education

EnergyMeans of transportation

Information

resources and services

Connectivity

Culture & Tradition

Financelivelihood

employment

Equality and justice

Gender Equality

Strong system, peace andstability

Socioeconom

healthy economy.

ic

Wages
Ethnic and racial equality

Social protection
age discrimination

Other socially vulnerable

civil liberties

rule of law

Sector diversity

Prosperity of small and medium-sized enterprises

Infra
Socio-economic convergencenaturalenvironClimate stability
Biodiversity and healthy

body of water

atmosphereecosystems

species

habitatment

circularity

soil

Resource intensitywaste

In addition, the SPTs of this framework are expected to have various impacts on all stages of the Mori
Building Group's supply chain, focusing on "Usage".
Raw materials

Manufacturing

Logistics

Usage

Waste/Recycle

Leasing

〇

〇

〇

〇

〇

Sales(Residense)

〇

〇

〇

〇

〇

Facility/Retail

〇

〇

〇

〇

〇

Overseas

〇

〇

〇

〇

〇

22/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Effectiveness: Will there be a big impact (sales composition ratio of the target business, domestic andoverseas market share, ambition, etc.)
Mori Building Group's business spans four areas: leasing, sales, facility/retail, and overseas. Operating
revenue for the fiscal year ending March 2023 was 285.5 billion yen, total assets amounted to 2,6074.4
billion yen, and total assets are large enough to rank in the top five in Japanese real estate industry. In
particular, Mori Building positions the ARK Hills area, Roppongi Hills area, and Toranomon Hills area in
Minato Ward, Tokyo, as "strategic areas," and has a strong presence in this area.
As activities related to SPTs, the Company announced the SBTi certification at the 1.5℃ level and
RE100 membership, which is expected to have a ripple effect on Japanese real estate industry, and theefforts of the green coverage rate are expected to have a ripple effect on Tokyo.
Based on the above, SPTs of this framework are expected to have various impacts on the real estateindustry and Tokyo Metropolitan Government.

Efficiency: Will it have a greater impact than invested capital?
(Importance, strategic significance, etc. in the entire business)
As mentioned above, SPTs are related to global goals such as the SDGs and the Paris Agreement, thegoal of the Japanese government and Minato Ward, and key themes of Mori Building. Invested capitalto achieve SPTs is expected to have an efficient impact on the entire Mori Building business.

Multiplier: Will private funds be used more than public funds and donations?
Mori Building has a track record of utilizing public funds in the past, but the use of private funds is themain factor in the proportion of total investment.

Additionality: Does it have additional impact?
(Efforts for sustainable development needs that lack response, progress toward achieving SDGs, etc.)
As listed below (next page), the SPT of this framework is expected to have additional impact on multiple
goals and targets out of the 17 SDGs and 169 targets.

Goal 7: Energy for everyone and clean.
23/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Target 7.2 Significantly increase the share of renewable energy in the global energy
mix by 2030.
Target 7.3 By 2030, double the rate of global energy efficiency improvement.
Goal 9: Create a foundation for industry and innovation
Target 9.4 By 2030, improve sustainability by improving infrastructure and industry by
improving resource utilization efficiency and expanding the introduction of clean
technologies and environmentally friendly technologies and industrial processes. All
countries will work according to their capabilities.
Goal 11: Creating a community where people can continue to live
Target 11.6 By 2030, reduce the adverse environmental impacts per capita of cities,
including by paying special attention to air quality and general and other waste
management.
Goal 13: Take concrete action on climate change
Target 13.1 Strengthen resilience and adaptability to climate-related and natural
disasters in all countries.
Goal 15: Protect the richness of the land
Target 15.1 By 2020, ensure the conservation, restoration and sustainable use ofterrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services, including forests,
wetlands, mountains and drylands, in accordance with their obligations underinternational agreements.

24/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

4. Characteristics of bonds/loans

4-1. JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
In this section, regarding the characteristics of bonds/loans specified in this framework, JCR will confirm
whether the interest rate of bonds/loans based on this framework changes depending on whether or not
the preset SPTs are achieved.

4-2. Overview of characteristics of bonds / loans and evaluation by JCR▶▶▶ Evaluation results
The characteristics of bonds / loans defined in this framework meet SLBP etc.

The financial and structural characteristics of SLBs or SLLs under this framework will change dependingon the achievement status of SPTs. The detail of changes include the step up/step down in interest
rates, donations, and purchasing of emission credits / certifications, which are specified in the statutory
disclosure documents, etc. at the time of each financing.
In the case of donations, if a third-party verified report stating that the set SPTs have been achieved is
not received by the determination date, donations in an amount corresponding to the percentage
specified in the statutory disclosure documents will be made to qualified donation recipients by the
reimbursement/repayment date. Qualified donation recipients are public interest incorporated
associations, public interest foundations, general foundations, international organizations, local
government-certified non-profit organizations, local governments, national and public university
corporations, school corporations, research institutions, and similar organizations related to theimprovement of SPTs that have not been achieved. The recipients of the donations will be determinedwith the necessary approvals prior to the reimbursement/repayment date.
In the case of purchasing an emission credits or certifications, if a third-party verified report stating that
the SPTs have been achieved is not received by the determination date. In that case, Mori Building willpurchase emission credits (credits of CO2 reduction value) or certifications (Green Power Certificates,
Non-Fossil Certificates, I-REC, etc.) in an amount corresponding to the percentage specified in the above
statutory disclosure documents by the reimbursement/repayment date.
In the event of a force majeure event (a change in trading system regulations, etc.) that prevents us frompurchasing emission credits or certifications, Mori Building will make a donation to qualified donation
recipients.
Based on the above, JCR confirmed that necessary arrangements have been made regarding thecharacteristics of bonds / loans and that necessary disclosures will be made.

25/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

5. Reporting / verification

5-1. Evaluation perspective
In this section, regarding the reporting specified in this framework, JCR confirms whether the latest
information on the performance of the selected KPIs and information that can judge the ambition of
SPTs are disclosed at least once a year. In addition, regarding the verification specified in this framework,
JCR confirms whether independent external verification of the selected KPI results will be carried out
and whether the verification contents will be disclosed.

5-2. Outline of reporting / verification and evaluation by JCR▶▶▶ Evaluation results
The reporting and verification specified in this framework meet all the conditions to be met shown in
SLBP etc.

Mori Building plans to announce the following contents on its website annually or disclose them tolenders.
・Performance of the KPIs
・Performance against the SPTs
・Up-to-date information of Sustainability strategies relative to the KPIs and SPTs
・If SPTs have not been reached and "donations" are made, the amount and recipients of the donations.
If SPTs have not been reached and "purchasing emission credits or certifications" are made, theamount and the name of the emission credits or certifications.
Mori Building’s performance of each KPI against the SPT is verified by an independent third party on anannual basis until a decision date is reached. The results of the verification will be disclosed on its
website (or Mori Building reports them to the lender in the case of loans).

6. Conclusion on suitability for SLBP, etc.
From the above, JCR confirmed that this framework conforms to SLBP etc.

26/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Chapter 2: Green Finance Framework Assessment
Eva lua t i o n P ha se I : Gr e enn e ss Ev alu at i o ng1(F)I. Use of Proceeds
JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
In this section, JCR first confirms whether the proceeds set out is used for green projects that have clear
environmental improvement effects. Then, in cases where the use of proceeds is expected to have anegative impact on the environment and society, JCR confirms whether the impact is fully examined byan internal specialist department or an external third party or whether necessary measures have beentaken for its workaround and mitigation. Finally, JCR confirms the consistency with the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs.)▶▶▶ Current Status of Evaluation Target and JCR’s evaluation
The two categories in this framework are important measures that contribute to materiality, and are
expected to have an environmental improvement effect.

In this framework, Mori Building has a mechanism that can procure green finances using green projects.
The finances will be applied to new investments or refinancing in projects that meet the following
eligibility criteria (eligible projects). In addition, when refinancing renewable energy projects, it is limited
to expenditures made within 36 months prior to the execution of green finances.

This framework for the use of funds■ Use of Proceeds
Mori Building will use the proceeds of the green finances (green bonds / green loans) for new
investment and/or refinance projects that meet the following eligible criteria (the eligible projects).
When refinancing renewable energy projects, it is limited to expenditures made within 36 months prior
to the execution of green finances.
Project
Category

Eligible Criteria

SDGs

Green Buildings

Expenditures or investments in new and/or existing buildings that meet one

9.Industry, Innovationof the following (i) to (iii) (costs related to acquisition of land or buildings,

and Infrastructure

planning and development, construction (including the cost of acquisition

11.Sustainable Cities

of reserved floor), refurbishment and operational management, researchand Communities

and development expenses, etc.)
Investments in an SPC that owns and/or plans to acquire buildings thatmeet one of the following (i) to (iii) (including anonymous partnershipinvestment.)
27/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

i.

have received at least one of the following third-party green building
certifications or recertifications within 24 months prior to the date ofgreen bond issuanceii.

are expected to receive certifications or recertifications post-issuanceiii.

have a construction completion date within 24 months prior to thedate of green bond issuance and have achieved at least one of thefollowing certifications or recertifications

Third party certification-

A or S Rank under the Comprehensive Assessment System for Built
Environment Efficiency (CASBEE) Certification for Buildings (NewConstruction, Existing Buildings, and Renovation) or CASBEE
Certification for Real Estate-Gold Rank or Platinum under the LEED BD+C (Building Design andConstruction) or LEED O+M (Building Operations and Maintenance)-

4 or 5 Stars under the Building Energy-efficiency Labeling System(BELS)-

4 or 5 Stars under DBJ Green Building Certification

Gold Plus or Platinum Rank under the BCA Green Mark Certification
Renewable
EnergyProcurement of electricity derived from renewable energy (solar, wind)

3.Good Health andExpenditures related to the installation or acquisition of renewable energy

Well-being(solar, wind) equipment (costs related to acquisition of land or equipment,

7.Affordable andplanning and development, construction, research and development

Clean Energy

expenses, etc.)

9.Industry, Innovation,

Investments in an SPC that owns and/or acquire renewable energy (solar,

and Infrastructure

wind power) equipment (including anonymous partnership investment)

13. Climate Action

Mori Building will continuously recertify third-party green building certifications for its assets after their expiration bysustaining and improving assets' environmental performance through maintenance and refurbishment.

[JCR’s Evaluation for the Framework]

1. About the greenness of the project(1) About the environmental improvement effects of the use of proceeds
1 Use of proceeds 1: Green buildings
Use of proceeds 1 is expenditure related to new or existing properties that have acquired or renewed
green building certification (or are scheduled to acquire or renew in the future). This expenditure is toensure and maintain the "greenness" of land acquisition costs, building acquisition costs, planning anddevelopment costs, construction costs, refurbishment and operational management costs, research and28/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

development costs, etc. The proceeds defined in the Framework falls under the categories of "green
buildings which meet standards or are certified by certifications recognized regionally, nationally orinternationally" in the Green Bond Principles and the Green Loan Principles and of "green building
projects " in the Green Bond Guidelines and the Green Loan Guidelines.
As detailed below, green building certifications are environmental certifications that are regionally,nationally, or internationally recognized. Therefore, JCR evaluates projects that have obtained acertification level that meets the eligibility criteria as having an environmental improvement effect.
CASBEE (Integrated Built Environment Performance Evaluation System)
CASBEE stands for Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency, which is asystem to evaluate and rate buildings in terms of their environmental performance. In April 2001, under
the auspices of the Housing Bureau of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, aresearch committee (cka. the Japan Sustainable Building Consortium or JSBC) was established as aproject where industries, the government and academia joined forces. Ever since then, the system has
been developed andreviewed. Its valuation tools include CASBEE for Real Estate developed tostraightforwardly show environmental performance and to cater to the real estate market as well as
CASBEE for Buildings and CASBEE for Cities.
The evaluation results are shown at five levels: S rank (excellent), A rank (very good), B + rank (good),B-rank (fairly poor) and C rank (poor). CASBEE for Real Estate also has four levels: S rank (excellent), A
rank (very good), B + rank (good) and B rank (satisfying the essential items). As to CASBEE for Buildings,
the environmental performance (BEE: Built Environmental Efficiency) of a building is calculated by
dividing the environmental quality (Quality) by the environmental load (Load). Under CASBEE for
Buildings, buildings with BEE of 1.0 or more, i.e. properties having environmental quality exceeding theenvironmental load they have, are rated B+ or more. Buildings with A or higher, which Mori Building has
set as eligible criteria in this framework, have a BEE of 1.5 or higher for CASBEE-building (newconstruction), and their environmental quality clearly exceeds their environmental impact. Although themeasurement standard for CASBEE-real estate is not BEE, JCR evaluates that it has a highenvironmental improvement effect because it is a property equivalent to B+ in conventional CASBEEbuilding, etc.
Buildings rated A or S-rank based on Mori Building’s eligibility criteria must have BEE of 1.5 or more andclearly outperform the environmental load. Although CASBEE for Real Estate does not apply BEE as ameasurement standard, such buildings are B rank-equivalent properties based on conventional CASBEE
for Buildings, etc. For this reason, JCR has assessed that they are environmentally beneficial.

LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmentally Responsible Design)
LEED is an environmental performance assessment system for the environment of buildings and cities
developed and operated by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), a not-for-profit organization. LEED
stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, and a draft of the system was published in
1996 and has been updated once in several years.

29/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

There are six types of certifications: BD + C (building design and construction), ID + C (interior designand construction), O + M (building operations and maintenance), ND (neighborhood development),
Homes and Cities.
The sum of the points acquired in the respective categories show the levels: Platinum (80+ points earned),
Gold (60-79 points earned), Silver (50-59 points earned) and Certified (standard, 40-49 points earned).
Receiving higher scores or achieving the goals of the energy–saving category is often the precondition of
the evaluation. In order to acquire higher levels of the certification, it may be necessary to attain a highenergy-efficiency score. Accordingly, Gold or more, which Mori Building defines as the eligible level, isconsidered to be the level that buildings with high-energy-efficiency can receive, and thus JCR has
assessed that buildings with that level of the certificate are environmentally beneficial.

Building-Housing Energy-efficiency Labeling System ("BELS")BELS stands for Building-Housing Energy-efficiency Labeling System, which is the system, where the thirdparty evaluation organization evaluates and accredits energy-saving performance of new and existingbuildings. To acquire higher ratings under the system, buildings need to have excellent energy-saving
performance, which hinges on their skin performance and primary energy consumption. Building Energy
Index (BEI) ranks buildings by the number of stars: one through five stars. BEI measures energy-saving
performance relative to the standard value, which is calculated by dividing design primary energy
consumption by standard primary energy consumption. One-star buildings meet the energy conservation
standards for existing buildings, and two-star buildings meet the energy conservation standards for newly
built ones.
JCR believes that the use of the proceeds is proper because buildings with four stars or more under BELS,
which Mori Building has determined to be eligible, have energy-saving performance (non-residential: BEI of
0.75 or less).

DBJ Green Building Certification
DBJ Green Building Certification is a certification system provided by the Development Bank of Japan (DBJ)
for assessing buildings in terms of consideration for environment and society. They are rated by the numberof stars, and the point of evaluation is "whether the building is built with consideration for environment andsociety." The system evaluates them based on five major categories: "Energy and Resources (environmental
performance of buildings)," "Amenity (comfort of tenant users)," "Resilience (responsiveness to crises),""Community and Diversity (consideration for diversity and living environments) and Partnership (cooperation
with stakeholders)." Each of them is rated by five (properties with the best class environmental & social
awareness), four stars (properties with exceptionally high environmental & social awareness), three stars(properties with excellent environmental & social awareness), two stars (properties with high environmental& social awareness) and one star (properties with satisfactory environmental & social awareness). Although
it is not a system focusing on environmental performance, the system is highly recognized in Japan and hasa certain set of categories to evaluate environmental performance. Therefore, JCR has assessed that thecertification corresponds to "standards or certifications recognized regionally, nationally, or internationally"in the green project category defined in the Green Bond Principles. Since the certification is not
30/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

environmental performance-specific, however, receiving an environment performance rating from anothersystem may be recommendable.
DBJ Green Building Certification comprehensively evaluates buildings in terms not only of environmental
performance but also the comfort of tenant users, risk management such as crime/fire prevention,
consideration for living environment and community and cooperation with stakeholders. Its scoring system
is designed by compiling the data of specific "best practices" beneficial for environment and society, andthere are many in the real estate market that fall short of the levels needed for evaluation. To obtain a higher
rating, the building needs to be built with proper consideration for all its stakeholders as well as environment.
The level needed for acquiring DBJ Green Building Certification is assumed to be the top 20% or somewhereof all domestic income-producing properties in terms of consideration for environment and society.5 The top
three stars are assigned to the groups of such properties in the following percentages: five stars, the top
10%, four stars, the top 30%, and three stars, the top 60%. Accordingly, JCR has assessed that, in investing
the proceeds, Mori Building focuses on properties with high environmental performance among those toacquire the certification.21

BCA (Building and Construction Authority of Singapore) Green Mark Certification
Green Mark Scheme was introduced in 2005 by the Building and Construction Authority (BCA), an
administrative agency under Singapore's National Development Authority. The green mark system evaluates
new buildings and infrastructure such as existing buildings, parks and stations. New buildings and existingbuildings are evaluated based on five evaluation perspectives: energy efficiency, water use, environmental
protection, indoor environmental quality, and other green characteristics.
If the building to be evaluated meets certain requirements, it will be evaluated by the green mark system,
and if the environmental performance is superior to the general building performance, the building will obtainhigh score. A four-point rating (Certified (50 to 74 points), Gold (75 to 84 points), Gold Plus (85 to 89 points),
and Platinum (90 to 100 points)) is given according to the total score.
Regarding the heating and cooling load of buildings for non-residential buildings, high environmental
performance is required to obtain high ratings, such as the energy reduction effect of at least 25% for Gold
Plus and at least 30% for Platinum. From this, JCR evaluates that Gold Plus and above, which Mori Building
has set as eligible criteria, are targeted at buildings with high environmental performance.

————————————
21

Revision and Release of DBJ Green Building Certification Assessment Items (February 2019, DBJ Green Building Certification
Website)

31/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

2 Use of proceeds 2: Renewable energy
The Use of proceeds 2 is the acquisition of renewable energy, investments in an SPC. The use of theproceeds falls under "renewable energy" in the "Green Loan Principles" and "projects for renewableenergy" among the uses of the proceeds listed as examples in the "Green Loan Guidelines."
Power generation by solar power and wind power is a clean energy that replaces fossil fuels by using
solar power and wind power as energy sources, respectively, and has a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction
effect, and does not depend on limited resources such as fossil fuels. For this reason, it is expected toplay an important role in the 6th Strategic Energy Plan (Energy Plan), which was approved by the Dietin October 2021. According to the plan, in order to realize a new reduction target that will continue tochallenge the "Carbon Neutral Declaration" in 2050, a 46% reduction in CO2 emissions in 2030, and afurther 50% increase, in the field of renewable energy, the main premise is to ensure a stable supply andreduce energy costs (S + 3E). We will thoroughly make renewable energy the main power source andwill work on the principle of giving top priority to renewable energy, and promote the maximum
introduction while curbing the burden on the public and symbiosis with the local community.
In Energy Plan, renewable energy is positioned as the main power source in 2030, and the expansion ofrenewable energy is Japanese goal of reducing CO2 emissions in 2030 by 46% compared to 2013. JCR
evaluates that it is essential to achieve the long-term goal of 2050 carbon neutrality. Therefore, JCR
evaluates that the use of proceed has a high environmental improvement effect.

Chart 16: Overview of the Sixth Strategic Energy Plan22————————————
22

Source: Agency for Natural Resources and Energy 6th Basic Energy Plan

32/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

2. Negative impact on the Environment and Society
This framework for negative impacts on the Environment and Society
Mori Building confirms that all projects address the following requirements to reduce environmental
and social risks.
・Compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and ordinances, including Environmental Impact
Assessment, the Law on the Improvement of Energy Consumption Performance of Buildings and the
System of Building Environment Plan
・As necessary for project implementation, information provision to residents and hearing of residents
and related municipalities' opinions[Evaluation of JCR for this framework]
Mori Building consider negative impacts for all projects, as well as ways to avoid/mitigate negative
impacts. Mori Building can be both a power producer and an off-taker. Even as an off-taker, Mori Building
will review the results of environmental assessments and dialogue with the community.

Chart 17: Negative impact and avoidance / mitigation measures assumed by Mori Building23

Project Category

Green Building

Assumed negative impact
At the time of development,
refurbishment, demolition
Noise, waste, vibration, soil
pollution, etc.

Workarounds and mitigations for negative impacts
Waste generation control, reuse, and recycling
Proper operation of boilers and combustion
equipment
Appropriate treatment of hazardous waste
Creation of green space on the site

Solar power

Deforestation by development,
Sediment runoff, disposal of
Opposition from local communities
Disposal of solar panels

Development without deforestation and cutting
and embankment as much as possible
Consideration of recycling of solar panels

Wind power

Impact on ecosystem / nature
Impact on local residents (noise,etc.) Opposition from local residents

Consideration of impact minimization based on
the results of environmental assessment
Sufficient explanation through residents'
briefing session

Based on the above, JCR affirmed that Mori Building pays proper attention to negative impacts on theEnvironment and Society.

————————————
23

Materials provided by Mori Building

33/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

3. Consistency with SDGs
In light of ICMA's SDGs mapping, projects that are eligible for the use of funds will contribute to thefollowing SDGs goals and targets.
Goal 3: Health and well-being for all
Target 3.9 By 2030, substantially reduce the number of deaths and diseases from pollution of hazardous
chemicals, as well as air, water and soil.

Goal 7: Energy for everyone and clean.
Target 7.2. Significantly increase the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix by 2030.
Target 7.3: By 2030, double the rate of global energy efficiency improvement.

Goal 9: Build the foundation for industry and innovation
Target 9.1: Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and crossborder infrastructure, to support economic development and human well-being with a focus on affordable andequitable access for all.
Target 9.4. By 2030, improve sustainability by improving infrastructure and industry by improving resource
utilization efficiency and expanding the introduction of clean technologies and environmentally friendly
technologies and industrial processes. All countries will work according to their capabilities.

Goal 11: Create a city where you can continue to live
Target 11.6: By 2030, reduce per capita adverse environmental impacts in cities, including by paying special
attention to air quality and general and other waste management.

Goal 13: Take concrete action on climate change
Target 13.1. Strengthen capacity for resilience and adaptation to climate-related and natural disasters in all
countries.

34/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Eva lua t i o n P ha se 2: Ma nag e m e nt / Op er at i on /Tr a nsp ar en cy E val uat i onm1(F)I. Selection Standards and Processes for Use of Proceeds
JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
In this section, JCR confirms that the objectives to be achieved through green financing, theappropriateness of green project selection standards and processes, and whether or not a series ofprocesses are properly disclosed to investors/lenders and others.

▶▶▶ Current Status of Evaluation Target and JCR’s evaluation
JCR has evaluated that divisions with expert and the management are properly involved in setting
the criteria for selecting green goals and projects and its processes in the Framework and thattransparency is high.

1. GoalsMori Building has a policy that has been formed through the process of consistently working on city andurban development, which was the first large-scale urban redevelopment project by the private sector,
and positions "Create Cities, Nurture Cities" as a philosophy of urban development, "Vertical Garden
City" as an ideal city model and development method, and "Environment and Greenery," "Safety andSecurity" and "Culture and Art" as a mission and important theme for urban development.
In the "Environment and Greenery," the Company has established "harmonious coexistence of cities andnature," "decarbonized cities" and "resource recycling" as its environmental policy through "urban design
and its management" with the ideal of "Vertical Garden City," and it is working on "Regulatory Complianceand Environmental Management," "Environmental Information Disclosure" and "Environmental
Education and Awareness-raising Activities" in order to promote this policy.
All projects in this framework contribute to "Environment and Greenery," particularly "harmonious
coexistence of cities and nature," "decarbonized cities." All projects will lead to value creation for Mori
Building.
Based on the above, JCR evaluates that this framework is consistent with the Company's goals.

2. Selection criteria
The eligibility criteria for this framework are described in Evaluation Phase 1 of this report. JCR assesses
that the selection criteria for the project are appropriate.

35/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

3. Processes
This framework for the process

Project evaluation and selection process
Mori Building set the eligible criteria to select projects which will contribute to its mission, "Environment
and Greenery." The net proceeds of the green finances will be allocated to projects which meet theeligible criteria (the eligible projects).
The Finance Department and the Sustainability Committee will be charged with project selection inaccordance with the eligibility criteria. Selection of eligible projects is approved by a corporate officerof the Finance Department and the Sustainability Committee, and the final decision is made by the
President and CEO of the company.

[JCR’s Evaluation for this framework]
Mori Building's Architectural Design Department and Environmental Promotion Department will evaluate
green buildings, and Mori Building's Environmental Promotion Department will evaluate renewableenergy based on RE100 requirements. After that, a corporate officer of the Finance Department and theSustainability Committee will approve the project and the allocation in accordance with the eligible
criteria. The final decision is made by President and CEO.
Based on the above, JCR evaluates that the sustainability department and management team areappropriately involved in the project selection process in this framework.
Mori Building's green finance goals, criteria and processes will be disclosed in this report. In addition,
Mori Building will disclose this framework on its website. In addition, if requested by investors andlenders, Mori Building will provide explanations as appropriate.
Based on the above, JCR evaluates that this framework ensures transparency to investors, etc.

36/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

II. Management of the Proceeds
JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
It is usually assumed that the management of the proceeds varies widely depending on
issuers/borrowers. JCR confirms whether the proceeds are surely appropriated to the green project
and whether a mechanism and internal system are in place to make tracking easy. JCR also focuseson whether the proceeds are scheduled to be used for a green project at an early stage and on the
management and operation methods for unallocated funds.

▶▶▶ Current Status of Evaluation Target and JCR’s evaluation
JCR evaluates that the fund management system of Mori Building has been properly established, andthat the management method of the raised funds will be disclosed in this evaluation report, and that
this framework will be disclosed on the website, so it is highly transparent.

This framework for Management of the Proceeds

Management of Proceeds
Mori Building's Finance Department will manage the allocation of the net proceeds of green finances
on a biannual basis, using the internal management system until the maturity of the green finance.
Mori Building will manage the proceeds in the form of cash or cash equivalents while pending their
allocation to eligible projects.

[JCR’s Evaluation for this framework]
Mori Building's Finance Department will manage the allocation of the net proceeds of green finances ona biannual basis using the internal management system on a biannual basis until the maturity of thegreen finance. Mori Building will manage the proceeds in the form of cash or cash equivalents while
pending their allocation to eligible projects. If there is a significant change in the allocation of funds, thefunds will be allocated to alternative projects subject to appropriate internal decisions in accordancewith this framework. Mori Building will promptly disclose the situation.
This management is subject to internal audits and is also subject to external audits. Mori Building will
preserve documents and ledgers related to the management of procured funds until the expiration of therelevant financing term.
Based on the above, JCR evaluates that the fund management system of Mori Building has been properly
established, and that the management method of the raised funds will be disclosed in this evaluation
report, and that this framework will be disclosed on the website, so it is highly transparent.

37/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

III. Reporting
JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
In this section, JCR evaluates whether the disclosure system for investors before and after the issuanceof green bonds/loans, which is implemented with reference to the Framework, is planned in detail andin an effective manner.

▶▶▶ Current Status of Evaluation Target and JCR’s evaluation
JCR has assessed that Mori Building plans to properly report both the progress of the appropriation
and benefits from better environment.

This framework for reporting
Allocation Reporting
Mori Building will annually disclose the following contents on our website (or report them to the lenderin the case of loans) until the proceeds have been fully allocated to projects which meet the eligible
criteria.
Mori Building will report timely in the event of a significant change, etc., after full allocation of theproceeds.
·

List of projects with new investments or refinanced·

Amount of proceeds allocated to each project·

Amount of unallocated proceeds and scheduled allocation period·

Share of new investments vs. refinancing

Impact Reporting
Mori Building will disclose the following indicators to the extent practicable until the maturity of thegreen finance. This reporting will be disclosed annually on our website (or we report them to the lenderin the case of loans).

Project
Green Buildings

Impact Reporting Indicators
Overview of the projects (Name of the building andproject)
Name and level of certifications the eligible project
received
Energy consumption
CO2 emissions
CO2 emissions of total floor area
Water consumption

38/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Procurement of electricity derived

Renewable energy procurementfrom renewable energy (solar, wind)

CO2 emission reduction

Installation or acquisition of

Overview of the projects (Power plant, name of SPC,

renewable energy (solar, wind)etc.)

equipment

Installation status of renewable energy facilities

Investments in an SPC that owns

Amount of electricity generated by renewable energy

and/or acquires renewable energy

facilities(solar, wind power) equipment

CO2 emission reduction amount(including anonymous partnershipinvestment)[JCR’s Evaluation for the framework]

Allocation Reporting
Mori Building will annually disclose the following contents on its website until the proceeds have been
fully allocated to projects which meet the eligible criteria. Mori Building will report timely in the event ofa significant change, etc., after full allocation of the proceeds.

Impact Reporting
Mori Building will disclose the following items to the extent practicable until the maturity of the green
finance. This reporting will be disclosed annually on its website. The disclosure items include quantitative
indicators such as CO2 emissions and renewable energy procurement, which are appropriate.

Based on the above, JCR evaluates that Mori Building's reporting is proper.

39/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

IV. Organizational sustainability initiatives
JCR's Key Consideration in This Factor
In this section, JCR evaluates whether the management of the issuer/borrower positions
sustainability issues as a high priority for management and whether the sustainability policy,
process and selection criteria for green projects are clearly positioned through the establishment ofa department specializing in environmental issues or in collaboration with external organizations.

▶▶▶ Current Status of Evaluation Target and JCR’s evaluation
Mori Building positions sustainability as a key issue and has Sustainability Committee, where bothmanagement and operational departments are promoting sustainability activities. Mori Building also
participates in external/international initiatives. JCR highly evaluates these points.

As mentioned above, Mori Building has a policy that has been formed through the process of consistently
working on city and urban development, which was the first large-scale urban redevelopment project by
the private sector, and positions "Create Cities, Nurture Cities" as a philosophy of urban development,"Vertical Garden City" as an ideal city model and development method, and "Environment and Greenery,""Safety and Security" and "Culture and Art" as a mission and important theme for urban development.
"Vertical Garden City", an ideal urban model held out by Mori Building, is a compact complex thatvertically layers diverse urban functions including work, residence, recreation, commerce, education, andrelaxation, which are highly integrated walking distances. By aggregating subdivided plots of land andproviding high-rise buildings, the construction area above ground is kept to a minimum, resulting in wide
open spaces open to people and nature. This not only enables to grow urban nature and to realize life
with the four seasons, but also mitigates the heat island phenomenon by covering ground surfaces androoftops with greenery. The aggregation of diverse urban functions also brings about a leveling of energy
demand and enhancing energy efficiency. The Company considers that a compact city where work andresidence are in close proximity greatly reduces the time and energy required for commuting to work or
school and it also has positive effects on resource recycling and efficiency of distribution. Furthermore,
making high-level use of urban centers in this form aids in the protection of nature in suburbs. Mori
Building considers Vertical Garden City is a new urban model that aims for the harmonious coexistenceof cities and nature while reducing impacts on the global environment.
Mori Building has been working on sustainable urban development together with the local community inthe way of urban redevelopment projects even before the words "ESG" and "SDGs" came into the
spotlight. Under the philosophy of "Create Cities, Nurture Cities," the Company is dedicated to realizing
sustainable society, developing local communities, and contributing to the safety, health, and happinessof people and working on projects that contribute to the realization of a sustainable society, thedevelopment of the region, and the safety, health, and well-being of people. Among which, the three key
themes are “Environment and Greenery”, ”Safety and Security” and “Culture and Art.”
Mori Building recognizes that the promotion of sustainability initiatives is a material matter related to the
execution of its business operations, and has therefore established the Sustainability Committee, chaired

40/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

by the President and CEO, and its subordinate committees, the Environmental Promotion Committee
and the Committee on Human Rights and Societal Issues.
The Sustainability Committee deliberates on important sustainability-related issues such as climatechange, human rights, and supply chain management and supervises and monitors subordinate
committees. Specific activities and studies are carried out mainly by the Sustainability Promotion
Committee Secretariat, which was established under the Committee and is headed by the executive
officer in charge. In addition, the Board of Directors receives reports from the Sustainability Committee
regularly and manages and supervises important matters through discussion by the Board of Directors.
The Environmental Promotion Committee, chaired by the director in charge of the Environment
Promotion Department, is held once a quarter. The Committee promotes and manages cross-sectional
efforts to address various environmental issues, including climate change, and reports regularly to the
Sustainability Committee. The Sustainability Committee discusses essential matters such as formulating
policies to address climate-related risks and opportunities and establishing greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions targets. The Environmental Promotion Committee is responsible for reporting and discussing
important matters and implementing approved policies and plans, including identifying, assessing, andmanaging risks and opportunities.
Based on the above, Mori Building positions sustainability as a key issue and has Sustainability
Committee, where both management and operational departments are promoting sustainability activities.
Mori Building also participates in external/international initiatives. JCR highly evaluates these points.

41/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation Phase 3: Evaluation result（Concｌusion）

Green 1 (F)Regarding this framework, based on the JCR Green Finance Evaluation Method, "Greenness Evaluation(Use of Funds)" is "g1 (F)", "Management / Operation / Transparency Evaluation" is "m1 (F)", and "JCR
Green Finance Framework Evaluation" is "Green 1 (F)". In addition, this framework is considered to meetthe criteria for the items required in the "Green Bond Principles", "Green Loan Principles", "Green Bond
Guidelines", and "Green Loan Guidelines".

Management / operation / transparency evaluation

Greenness evaluation

m1(F)

m2(F)

m3(F)

m4(F)

m5(F)

g1(F)

Green 1 (F)Green 2 (F)Green 3 (F)Green 4 (F)Green 5 (F)g2(F)

Green 2 (F)Green 2 (F)Green 3 (F)Green 4 (F)Green 5 (F)g3(F)

Green 3 (F)Green 3 (F)Green 4 (F)Green 5 (F)

N/A

g4(F)

Green 4 (F)Green 4 (F)Green 5 (F)

N/A

N/A

g5(F)

Green 5 (F)Green 5 (F)

N/A

N/A

N/A

(Responsible) Atsuko Kajiwara, Daisuke Sato

42/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Important explanation about this evaluation
1. Assumptions, Significance, and Limitations of JCR Sustainability Finance Framework Evaluation
The JCR Green Finance Framework Assessment granted and provided by Japan Credit Rating Agency (JCR) is an expressionof JCR's overall opinion at this time regarding the degree of management, operation and transparency assurance efforts related
to the alignment with green projects defined by JCR and the use of proceeds, based on the policies stipulated in the Green
Finance Framework. Therefore, the specific environmental benefits of the use of proceeds, such as individual bonds or loans
implemented based on the policy, management / operation system / transparency evaluation. will not be performed, andindividual bonds or individual loans based on the framework will be carried out. If a green finance evaluation is needed, aseparate evaluation is required. The JCR Green Finance Framework Evaluation does not prove the improvement effect ofindividual bonds or loans implemented under the framework on the environment, and is not responsible for the environmental
benefits. With regard to the environmental benefits of proceeds financed through the Green Finance Framework, JCR will
confirm matters quantitatively and qualitatively measured by the issuer or the borrower (hereinafter, the issuer and theborrower are collectively referred to as the "finance raiser"), or by a third party requested by the finance raiser, but inprinciple, this will not be measured directly.
The second-party opinions granted and provided by JCR area statement of JCR's current comprehensive opinion on thealignment of the evaluation target to the Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles formulated by the International Capital Market
Association (ICMA), the Asia Pacific Loan Market Association (APLMA), the Loan Market Association (LMA), and the Loan
Syndications and Trading Association (LSTA) and the Sustainability-Linked Bond / Loan Guidelines formulated by the Ministryof the Environment. and do not fully indicate the degree of positive impact that was brought about by the evaluation target.
This second-party opinions evaluate the current plan or situation based on the information provided by the client and theinformation independently collected by JCR, and do not guarantee an evaluation of the future situation. This second-party
opinions do not quantitatively prove the positive effects of sustainability-linked bonds/loans, and JCR is not responsible forthe effects. JCR confirms that the degree of achievement of the sustainability performance targets is measured quantitatively
and qualitatively by the finance raiser or a third party requested by the finance raiser, but in principle, this is not measured
directly.
2. The method used to carry out this evaluation
The method used in conducting this evaluation is posted as "JCR Green Finance Evaluation Method" in "Sustainable Finance/ ESG" on the JCR website (https://www.jcr.co.jp/).
3. Relationship with acts related to credit rating business
The act of granting and providing the JCR Green Finance Framework Evaluation is performed by JCR as a related businessand is different from the act of credit rating business.
4. International initiatives, principles, etc. referenced in providing this second-party opinion
In providing this second-party opinion, JCR refers to the following principles and guides developed by ICMA, APLMA, LMA,
LSTA, the Ministry of the Environment and the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative.
・ Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles
・ Sustainability-Linked Loan Principles
・ Sustainability-Linked Bond / Loan Guidelines
・ Positive Impact Financial Principles
5. Relationship with credit ratings
This evaluation is different from the credit rating, and does not promise to provide or provide a predetermined credit rating
for viewing.
6. Third-Party Evaluation of JCR Green Finance Framework Evaluation
There is no capital or personal relationship between the subject of this evaluation and JCR that may create a conflict ofinterest.
■ Points to Consider

The information contained in this document was obtained by JCR from finance raisers and accurate and reliable sources. Such information however may be mistaken
for artificial, mechanical or other reasons. Therefore, JCR makes neither representation nor warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, result, eligibility, timeliness,completeness, merchantability, or fitness for any particular purpose of such information, and JCR assumes no responsibility for any errors, omissions or consequencesof using such information. JCR shall not be liable for any loss of opportunity and extraordinary, indirect, incidental or consequential damage of any kind, including any
loss of money, which result from any use of such information under any circumstances, whether contractual liability, tort liability, negligence or other causes of liability,
and whether such damage is foreseeable or unforeseeable. JCR Green Finance Evaluation does not express any opinion on various risks (credit risk, price fluctuation
risk or market liquidity risk) on the green finance that is the subject of evaluation. JCR Green Finance Evaluation is a comprehensive opinion of JCR at present and does
neither represent facts nor make any recommendation regarding risk assessments or decisions on the purchase, sale or holding of individual bonds or commercial paper.
JCR Green Finance Evaluation may be modified, suspended or withdrawn due to changes in information or lack of information. All rights pertaining to this document,
including data from the JCR Green Finance Evaluation is prohibited from being reproduced, modified or otherwise altered without the permission of JCR.

■ Terminology

JCR Green Finance Framework Evaluation: Evaluates the extent to which proceeds financed under the Green Finance Framework are allocated to green projects as
defined by JCR, as well as the extent to which efforts are made to ensure management, operation, and transparency in relation to the use of such green finance proceeds.

43/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

The evaluation is displayed on a 5-point scale, from top to bottom, using the evaluation symbols Green1 (T) (F), Green2 (T) (F), Green3 (T) (F), Green4 (T) (F), andGreen5 (T) (F).

■ Registration status as an external evaluator of sustainability finance, etc.
・ Ministry of the Environment Green Finance External Reviewer Registration
・ ICMA (Registered as an observer as an external evaluator with the International Capital Market Association)
UNEP FI Positive Impact Financial Principles: Member of the Working Group■ Other registration status as a credit rating agency, etc.
・ Credit Rating Agency Financial Services Agency Commissioner (Rating) No. 1
・ EU Certified Credit Rating Agency
・NRSRO: JCR is registered in the following four of the five credit rating classes of NRSRO (Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization) established by
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (1) Financial institutions, broker-dealers, (2) insurance companies, (3) general business corporations, and (4)government and local governments. If you are subject to disclosure under Section 17g-7(a) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, such disclosure is
attached to a news release posted on the JCR website (https://www.jcr.co.jp/en/).

■ Inquiries regarding this matter

Information Service Department TEL: 03-3544-7013 FAX: 03-3544-7026

44/44
Copyright © Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.