Digital Preservation
Guidance Note:2

Selecting Storage Media for Long-TermPreservation

Digital Preservation Guidance Note 2: Selecting storage media for long-term preservation

Document ControlAuthor: Adrian Brown, Head of Digital Preservation Research
Document Reference: DPGN-02
Issue: 2
Issue Date: August 2008

©THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES 2008
Page 2 of 7

Digital Preservation Guidance Note 2: Selecting storage media for long-term preservation

Contents
1

INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................42

SELECTION ISSUES .............................................................................................................4
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6

Longevity...........................................................................................................................5Capacity ............................................................................................................................5
Viability ..............................................................................................................................5
Obsolescence...................................................................................................................5Cost....................................................................................................................................5
Susceptibility.....................................................................................................................53THE MEDIA SELECTION SCORECARD ...........................................................................64

CONCLUSION .........................................................................................................................75

BIBLIOGRAPHY .....................................................................................................................7Page 3 of 7

Digital Preservation Guidance Note 2: Selecting storage media for long-term preservation

1 Introduction
This document is one of a series of guidance notes produced by The National Archives,
giving general advice on issues relating to the preservation and management ofelectronic records. It is intended for use by anyone involved in the creation of electronic
records that may need to be preserved over the long term, as well as by those
responsible for preservation.
This guidance note provides information for the creators and managers of electronic
records about the selection of physical storage media in the context of long-termpreservation.
The scope of this guidance note is limited to removable storage media. Server-based
hard disk storage offers a secure storage regime for electronic records, provided it is wellmanaged and includes an effective back-up strategy. In many situations however, thismay be neither possible nor appropriate. Removable media usually have some part toplay in the life cycle of any electronic record. This guidance note sets out a range of
criteria that aims to help data creators and archivists make informed choices about
selecting removable storage media.

2 Selection issues
Any physical storage medium is, by definition, completely dependent upon very specificcombinations of hardware and software for access. The accessibility of information stored
on such media is highly vulnerable in today’s rapidly evolving technological environment.
This issue is not solely the concern of digital archivists, but of all those responsible formanaging and sustaining access to electronic records over even relatively shorttimescales.
No computer storage medium can be considered archival, irrespective of its physicallongevity: technological obsolescence is inevitable and all media have limited life spans.
For the foreseeable future, the need to periodically refresh electronic records onto newmedia is therefore inescapable. Careful selection of storage media can maximise theperiods between refreshment cycles and simplify the refreshment process, in addition toensuring that data is as secure as possible.
The following criteria should be considered by data creators when selecting removablestorage media:




Longevity
Capacity
Viability
Obsolescence
Cost
Susceptibility

Page 4 of 7

Digital Preservation Guidance Note 2: Selecting storage media for long-term preservation

These criteria are elaborated in the following sections:

2.1 Longevity
The media storage option chosen should have a proven life span of at least 10 years.
Longevity greater than this, however, is not necessarily an advantage: over longer
timescales, obsolescence of the drive technology used to read the medium will typicallybe a much more significant factor than physical deterioration of the storage medium itself.

2.2 Capacity
The media storage option chosen should provide a storage capacity appropriate for thequantity of data to be stored and the physical size of the storage facilities available.
Minimising the number of actual media to be managed will generally be more efficientand cost effective.

2.3 Viability
The media and drives chosen should support robust error-detection methods for both
reading and writing data. Provision for testing the integrity of media after writing is also abenefit. Proven data recovery techniques should also be available in case of data loss.
Media should be write-once, or have a reliable write-protect mechanism to prevent
accidental erasure and maintain the evidential integrity of the data.

2.4 Obsolescence
The media and its supporting hardware and software should preferably be based on
mature, rather than leading-edge technology. The technology should be well establishedin the market place and widely available. Media technologies that are based upon open
standards for both media and drives are generally preferable to those that are proprietary
to a single manufacturer.

2.5 Cost
Two elements must be considered when assessing the relative costs of storage media –the cost of the media itself and the total cost of ownership. Valid comparisons of media
costs must always be made on a price per Gigabyte (GB) basis. The total cost ofownership will include costs for purchasing and maintaining the necessary hardware andsoftware, and of any storage equipment required. Support costs and the quoted MeanTime Before Failure of the relevant drive must also be taken into account.

2.6 Susceptibility
The media should have low susceptibility to physical damage and be tolerant of a wide
range of environmental conditions without data loss. Magnetic media should have a highcoercivity value (preferably in excess of 1000 Oersteds 1 ), in order to minimise the1: Oersteds are the unit of measurement for magnetic field intensity.
Page 5 of 7

Digital Preservation Guidance Note 2: Selecting storage media for long-term preservation

chances of accidental erasure through exposure to magnetic fields. Any measuresrequired to counter known susceptibilities (such as packaging or storage requirements)
should be affordable and achievable.

3 The Media Selection Scorecard
The scorecard approach illustrated below uses a simple method for evaluating currently
available media against the selection criteria 2 . Each medium should be scored against
the criteria on a scale of 1 (does not meet the criterion) to 3 (fully meets the criterion). Asa general rule, no medium that scores less than 12 should be considered.
An example scorecard, comparing some common media types, is shown below:

Media

CD-R

DVD-R

Hard
Disk

Flash Memory
Stick and CardLongevity

3

3

2

1

LinearTape Open(LTO)
3

Capacity

13323Viability

22213

Obsolescence12222Cost

33133

Susceptibility

11313Total

1114131017Figure 1: Media Selection Scorecard
The evaluation process should fully take into account variations within a media type. For
example, a number of different dye and metal layer combinations are available for CD-Rs.
In this example, CD-Rs with a gold reflective layer and phthalocyanine-based dyes havebeen assessed, since recent research suggests that these are the most stable, and havethe greatest life span.

In situations where multiple copies of data are stored on separate media, it may be
advantageous to use different media types for each copy, preferably using different basetechnologies (for example, magnetic and optical). This reduces the overall technology
dependence of the stored data. Where the same type of media is used for multiple
copies, different brands or batches should be used in each case in order to minimise therisks of data loss due to problems with specific manufacturers or batches.

2: This approach is based upon the concept of the media selection scorecard proposed by Bennett (1997, 18-19).
Page 6 of 7

Digital Preservation Guidance Note 2: Selecting storage media for long-term preservation

4 Conclusion
There are many issues to be considered when selecting physical storage media that
extend beyond the immediate and obvious requirements of the situation. This guidancenote should assist data creators to make informed decisions based on the ever-changing
choices available.
The adoption of appropriate storage media for electronic records brings benefits to data
creators, data managers and digital archivists. Selection decisions informed by the criteriadescribed in this guidance note will greatly enhance the sustainability of the records
created.

5 Bibliography
Bennett, J C, 1997, A framework of data types and formats, and issues affecting the longterm preservation of digital material. JISC/NPO studies on the preservation of electronicmaterials, British Library Research and Innovation Report, 50

Page 7 of 7