Section TwoTHE COMMON DEFENSE

While the lives of Americans are affected in noteworthy ways, for better orworse, by each part of the executive branch, the inherent importance ofnational defense and foreign affairs makes the Departments of Defense
and State first among equals. Originating in the George Washington Administration, the War Department (as it was then known) was headed by Henry Knox,
America’s chief artillery officer in the Revolutionary War; Thomas Jefferson, theprimary author of the Declaration of Independence, was the first Secretary of State.
Despite such long and storied histories, neither department is currently living up
to its standards, and the success of the next presidency will be determined in partby whether they can be significantly improved in short order.
“Ever since our Founding,” former acting secretary of defense Christopher Miller
writes in Chapter 4, “Americans have understood that the surest way to avoid war is
to be prepared for it in peace.” Yet the Department of Defense “is a deeply troubled
institution.” It has emphasized leftist politics over military readiness, “Recruiting
was the worst in 2022 that it has been in two generations,” and “the Biden Administration’s profoundly unserious equity agenda and vaccine mandates have taken aserious toll.” Additionally, Miller writes that “the atrophy of our defense industrial
base, the impact of sequestration, and effective disarmament by many U.S. allies
have exacted a high toll on America’s military.” Moreover, our military has adopted
a risk-averse culture—think of masked soldiers, sailors, and airmen—rather thaninstilling and rewarding courage in thought and action.
The good news is that most enlisted personnel, and most officers, especiallybelow the rank of general or admiral, continue to be patriotic defenders of liberty.

— 87 —

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise

But this is now Barack Obama’s general officer corps. That is why Russ Voughtargues in Chapter 2 that the National Security Council “should rigorously review
all general and flag officer promotions to prioritize the core roles and responsibilities of the military over social engineering and non-defense related matters,
including climate change, critical race theory, manufactured extremism, and otherpolarizing policies that weaken our armed forces and discourage our nation’s finest
men and women from enlisting.” Ensuring that many of America’s best and brightest continue to choose military service is essential.
“By far the most significant danger” to America from abroad, Miller writes, “isChina.” That communist regime “is undertaking a historic military buildup,” which“could result in a nuclear force that matches or exceeds America’s own nuclear
arsenal.” Resisting Chinese expansionist aims “requires a denial defense” whereby
we make “the subordination of Taiwan or other U.S. allies in Asia prohibitively
difficult.” However, Miller adds that “[c]ritically, the United States must be able
to do this at a level of cost and risk that Americans are willing to bear.”
The best gauge of such willingness is congressional approval. Accordingly, wemust rediscover and adhere to the Founders’ wise division of war powers, wherebyCongress, the most representative and deliberative branch, decides whether togo to war; and the executive, the most energetic and decisive branch, decides how
to carry it out once begun. As the past 75 years have repeatedly demonstrated indifferent ways—from Korea, to Vietnam, to Iraq, to Afghanistan—we depart fromour constitutional design at our peril.
Miller writes that we “must treat missile defense as a top priority,” ensure that
more of our weapons are made in America, reform the budgeting process, andsustain “an efficient and effective counterterrorism enterprise.” Across all of ourefforts, we must keep in mind that part of peace through strength is knowing whento fight. As George Washington warned nearly two centuries ago, we must continue to be on guard against being drawn into conflicts that do not justify greatloss of American treasure or significant shedding of American blood. At the sametime, we must be prepared to defend our interests and meet challenges where andwhen they arise.
An effective diplomatic corps is central to defending our interests and influencing world events. Whereas most military personnel have had leftist priorities
imposed from above, the problem at State comes largely from within. Former
State Department director of policy planning Kiron Skinner writes in Chapter
6, “[L]arge swaths of the State Department’s workforce are left-wing and predisposed to disagree with a conservative President’s policy agenda and vision.” Sheadds that the department possesses a “belief that it is an independent institutionthat knows what is best for the United States, sets its own foreign policy, anddoes not need direction from an elected President”—a view that does not alignwith the Constitution.

— 88 —

2025 Presidential Transition Project

The solution to this problem is strong political leadership. Skinner writes, “Thenext Administration must take swift and decisive steps to reforge the department
into a lean and functional diplomatic machine that serves the President and, thereby,
the American people.” Because the Senate has been extraordinarily lax in fulfillingits constitutional obligation to confirm presidential appointees, she recommends
putting appointees into acting roles until such time as the Senate confirms them.
Skinner writes that State should also stop skirting the Constitution’s treaty-making requirements and stop enforcing “agreements” as treaties. It should
encourage more trade with allies, particularly with Great Britain, and less withadversaries. And it should implement a “sovereign Mexico” policy, as our neighbor“has functionally lost its sovereignty to muscular criminal cartels that effectively
run the country.” In Africa, Skinner writes, the U.S. “should focus on core security,
economic, and human rights” rather than impose radical abortion and pro-LGBT
initiatives. Divisive symbols such as the rainbow flag or the Black Lives Matter flag
have no place next to the Stars and Stripes at our embassies.
When it comes to China, Skinner writes that “a policy of ‘compete where wemust, but cooperate where we can’…has demonstrably failed.” The People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) “aggressive behavior,” she writes, “can only be curbed throughexternal pressure.” Efforts to protect or excuse China must stop. She observes,“[M]any were quick to dismiss even the possibility that COVID escaped from a
Chinese research laboratory.” Meanwhile, Skinner writes, “[g]lobal leaders including President Joe Biden…have tried to normalize or even laud Chinese behavior.”
She adds, “In some cases, these voices, like global corporate giants BlackRock andDisney”—or the National Basketball Association (NBA)—“directly benefit fromdoing business with Beijing.”
Former vice president of the U.S. Agency for Global Media Mora Namdar writes
in Chapter 8 that we need to have people working for USAGM who actually believein America, rather than allowing the agencies to function as anti-American, taxpayer-funded entities that parrot our adversaries’ propaganda and talking points.
Former acting deputy secretary of homeland security Ken Cuccinelli says in Chapter 5 that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a creation of the George
W. Bush era, should be closed, as it has added needless additional bureaucracy andexpense without corresponding benefit. He recommends that it be replaced witha new “stand-alone border and immigration agency at the Cabinet level” and thatthe remaining parts of DHS be distributed among other departments.
Former chief of staff for the director of National Intelligence Dustin Carmack
writes in Chapter 7 that the U.S. Intelligence Community is too inclined to lookin the rearview mirror, engage in “groupthink,” and employ an “overly cautious”
approach aimed at personal approval rather than at offering the most accurate,unvarnished intelligence for the benefit of the country. And in Chapter 9, former
acting deputy administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development Max— 89 —

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise

Primorac asserts that the United States Agency for International Development(USAID) must be reformed, writing, “The Biden Administration has deformed theagency by treating it as a global platform to pursue overseas a divisive political andcultural agenda that promotes abortion, climate extremism, gender radicalism,
and interventions against perceived systematic racism.”If the recommendations in the following chapters are adopted, what Skinnersays about the State Department could be true for other parts of the federal government’s national security and foreign policy apparatus: The next conservative
President has the opportunity to restructure the making and execution of U.S.
defense and foreign policy and reset the nation’s role in the world. The recommendations outlined in this section provide guidance on how the next President
should use the federal government’s vast resources to do just that.

— 90 —