SIMPLY AMAZINGP H I L I P

M O R R I S

2 0 1 9I N T E R N AT I O N A L

A N N UA L

R E P O R T

Simply Amazing
The Simply Amazing campaign
focuses on everyday, relatable
moments and emotions byshowcasing to adult smokers thebenefits of switching to IQOS.

Strong Underlying 2019 Performance
Net Revenues

Adjusted Operating Income

Adjusted Operating Income Margin+6.4%+11.2%+1.7pp1

1

vs. 2018

vs. 2018

vs. 2018 1

Adjusted Diluted EPS

Operating Cash Flow

Annualized Dividend+9.9%$10.1 billion$4.68/share2

vs. 2018 1

Note: All references throughout this report to “like-for-like” performance reflect pro forma 2018 results, which have been adjusted for thedeconsolidation of our Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges, Inc. (RBH), effective March 22, 2019. All references to adjusted results
reflect the exclusion of asset impairment, exit costs and other charges. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures
are provided on pages R-1 to R-2. All references to IQOS are to our Platform 1 heat-not-burn products, unless otherwise stated.
(1)
On a like-for-like basis, excluding currency.
(2)
Annualized rate based on a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per common share, declared September 11, 2019.

Dear Shareholder
2019 was a year of significant progress and continued success for PMI.
We delivered strong underlying business performance, notably reflecting
broad-based growth for IQOS and solid combustible tobacco pricing. We
also reached several important milestones, such as the introduction ofa version of IQOS into the U.S. market following its authorization by the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the Pre-Market Tobacco
Application (PMTA) pathway.
2019 vs. 2018 Results
Total cigarette and heated tobacco unit
(HTU) shipment volume of 766.4 billion
units decreased by 2.0%, or by 1.4% on a
like-for-like basis. This compares to a totalinternational industry volume decline of 2.0%,
excluding China and the U.S.
Total cigarette and HTU market share grew
by 0.1 percentage point, reaching 28.4% of theinternational market, excluding China and the
U.S., driven mainly by the strong performanceof our HTU brands. While our share of theinternational cigarette market declined by
0.3 percentage points, cigarette share for
Marlboro increased by 0.3 percentage points
to reach 10.0% – an all-time high.
Net revenues of $29.8 billion increased
by 0.6%. On a like-for-like basis, currencyneutral net revenues increased by 6.4%, driven
primarily by higher HTU shipment volumes,
coupled with strong combustible tobacco
pricing that more than offset unfavorable
combustible tobacco volume/mix.
Adjusted operating income (OI) of $11.8
billion increased by 3.4%. On a like-for-likebasis, currency-neutral adjusted OI increasedby 11.2%, driven by net revenue growth,
coupled with the favorable impact of our costsavings initiatives and increasing leverage ofexisting smoke-free product infrastructure bya growing volume and user base.
Like-for-like adjusted OI margin increased
by 170 basis points, excluding currency,
despite net incremental investment behindsmoke-free products.

Adjusted diluted EPS of $5.19 increased by
1.8%. On a like-for-like basis, currency-neutral
adjusted diluted EPS increased by 9.9%.
Operating cash flow of $10.1 billion grew
by $0.6 billion, or 6.5%, primarily reflecting
favorable working capital movements.
In September, the Board of Directors
approved a 2.6% increase in the quarterly
dividend to an annualized rate of $4.68
per share. This represented the twelfth
consecutive year in which we increased ourdividend since becoming a public company
in 2008.
Our total shareholder return (TSR) in 2019was 35.0% in U.S. dollar terms, outperformingthat of the S&P 500 (31.5%) and our Peer
Group (23.5%). Since the spin-off in 2008, ourTSR was 187.5%.

André Calantzopoulos
Chief Executive Officer

Delivering a Smoke-Free Future
We continue to make important progress inour journey to replace cigarettes with smokefree alternatives. In 2019, smoke-free products
represented approximately 8% of PMI’s total
shipment volume, 19% of net revenues, 71%of commercial expenditure and 98% of R&D
expenditure.1 Only three years ago, these
metrics stood at approximately 1%, 3%, 15%
and 72%, respectively, demonstrating thesignificant – and rapid – shift in our business.
IQOS – the world’s leading heat-not-burnproduct – remains the driving force behind
this progress. As of December 2019, the total
number of IQOS users globally2 reached an
estimated 13.6 million, up by 41.8% versus

Louis C. Camilleri
Chairman of the Board

IQOS launches in the U.S.
In April 2019, a version of IQOS became the first heat-not-burn product to be authorized for sale by
the U.S. FDA under the PMTA pathway. The agency’s rigorous two-year review led to the conclusionthat IQOS is “appropriate for the protection of public health.” In September, our U.S. licensee, Altria
Group, Inc., launched IQOS in the initial lead market of Atlanta, GA, followed by a subsequent
expansion into the Richmond, VA, market in late 2019.
For shipment volume, this represents HTU shipment volume as a percentage of total cigarette and HTU shipment volume. For net revenues,
this represents reduced-risk product net revenues as a percentage of total net revenues, as shown on page R-1 in this report.
(2)“Total IQOS users” is defined as the estimated number of legal age (minimum 18 years) IQOS users that used PMI HTUs for at least 5% of their
daily tobacco consumption over the past seven days.
(1)

1

2019: IQOS at a Glance (change vs. 2018)
Total IQOS Users1

HTU Shipment Volume

Market Share of HTUs
in IQOS Markets2, 3

Smoke-Free Product
Net Revenues4

13.6 million

59.7 billion units

5.0%$5.6 billion+41.8%+44.2%+1.4pp+39.0% 52018. Importantly, an estimated 9.7 million of these users – orapproximately 71% – have stopped smoking and switched to
IQOS.6The increase in total IQOS users reflected growth acrossessentially all launch markets, including a near doubling inboth Germany and Italy, and even stronger growth in Russia.
The notable exception was Korea, where the number of IQOS
users declined, mainly reflecting ongoing consumer confusion
regarding the heated tobacco category stemming from the
Korean FDA’s misleading communication on tar.
IQOS user base growth drove a 44.2% increase in our 2019
HTU shipment volume, which reached 59.7 billion units. In
IQOS markets, excluding the U.S., our HTU brands reached afull-year share of 5.0%3 – up by 1.4 percentage points – making
them the fourth-largest tobacco “brand” in these markets.
We also made critical strides in the U.S. market, with theauthorization and subsequent commercialization of a version
of IQOS, and are now poised to deliver better choices to the
40 million adults in the U.S. who smoke. We look forward to
the FDA’s response to our Modified Risk Tobacco Productapplications for IQOS, which the agency continues to review.

Smoke-Free Product Portfolio
Building on the success of IQOS 3 and IQOS 3 MULTI, we
began the global launch and roll-out of IQOS 3 DUO last September. This latest addition to the IQOS family was designedwith enhanced features to help adult smokers switch moreseamlessly from cigarettes, notably allowing two consecutive
uses without recharging the holder. By year-end, IQOS 3 DUO
was available in all IQOS launch markets.2
Our aim to deliver a smoke-free future extends beyond
IQOS heat-not-burn and requires a portfolio approachthat addresses a range of adult smoker preferences andoccasions in order to maximize full switching. Last year we
made important advances in the e-vapor category withthe development of the next generation of our Platform 4
e-vapor product, IQOS VEEV, which we plan to launch in
the third quarter of this year and believe provides a superior
nicotine delivery and taste experience compared to existing
e-vapor products. We also took important steps towardcommercializing our Platform 2 heat-not-burn and Platform

3 nicotine salt products, and plan consumer tests for both
platforms in 2020.
Furthermore, in January 2020 we announced a global
collaboration agreement with KT&G, the leading tobaccoand nicotine company in South Korea, to commercialize theirsmoke-free products outside of the country. The agreement
will allow PMI to offer a smoke-free product portfolio thatprovides adult smokers with an ever-broader range of taste,
price and technology choices, thereby accelerating our visionof a smoke-free future.

Engaging with Stakeholders
As we continue to transform our business and ourorganization, it is not enough to simply provide smoke-free
products that meet the preferences of today’s adult smokers.
We also need to earn the trust and active cooperation of ahost of stakeholders, including regulators and public healthauthorities. We must consistently demonstrate that we arehonest, respectful and genuinely committed to transformativechange, and we must never fail to align our actions with ourwords across all areas of our business.
An essential step toward gaining trust is being transparent.
To that end, we have published our scientific research andfindings, and have announced a set of business transformation
metrics to allow others to measure our progress. We reportpublicly on these metrics annually in our Sustainability
Report,7 which also details our important efforts andachievements in areas such as our agricultural labor practices
and environmental footprint. We look forward to the
publication of our next report this May.
It is also essential to demonstrate our commitment to doing
our part in preventing underage use of nicotine and tobacco
products. During 2019, we undertook a comprehensive
assessment of our commercial practices, and we haveshared our findings through a report publicly available on
our website.8 The results of the assessment demonstrate
PMI’s strong adherence to our marketing standards, while
recognizing areas for further improvement.
In addition, we are initiating and engaging in global
conversations about the benefits of smoke-free products
for those adults who otherwise would continue to smoke.

“Total IQOS users” is defined as the estimated number of legal age (minimum 18 years) IQOS users that used PMI HTUs for at least 5% of their
daily tobacco consumption over the past seven days.
Excluding the U.S.
(3)
Reflects sales volume as a percentage of the total industry sales volume for cigarettes and HTUs.
(4)
Represents reduced-risk product net revenues, as shown on page R-1 in this report.
(5)
Excluding currency.
(6)
The estimated number of people who have “stopped smoking and switched to IQOS” is defined as: for markets where IQOS is the only
heat-not-burn product, daily individual consumption of PMI HTUs represents the totality of their daily tobacco consumption in the past sevendays; for markets where IQOS is one among other heat-not-burn products, daily individual consumption of HTUs represents the totality of
their daily tobacco consumption in the past seven days, of which at least 70% are PMI HTUs.
(7)
Link: https://www.pmi.com/sustainability/sustainability-report(8)
Link: https://www.pmi.com/resources/docs/default-source/default-document-library/responsible-marketing-practices-at-pmi.
pdf?sfvrsn=496446b4_4
(1)

(2)

2

Smoke-Free Product Portfolio

VV

All new, elegant and intuitive.

Compact, all-in-one design.

Intuitive, user-friendly design.

Next generation e-vapor.

IQOS 3 DUO uses the latest
HeatControlTM Technology thatdelivers the best heated tobacco
experience. Its compact andergonomic design is perfect for
all tobacco moments, whatever
the occasion.

The lightweight, pocket-sized
design of the new IQOS 3 MULTI
makes it perfect for use on
the go. It allows for sequential
tobacco sessions with nocharging time between enjoying
HeatSticks/HEETS.

IQOS 2.4 Plus is the third version
of IQOS to be commercialized.
2.4 Plus delivers the mostsatisfying heated tobacco
experience free from fire, smoke
and ash in a way that could bemade available to all smokers.

IQOS VEEV is our e-vapor productthat uses a new and satisfying
approach to vapor. Unlike regulare-cigarettes, VEEV cartridges
are manufactured, assembled,
pre-filled, and pre-sealed in our
European production facilities.

V

V

V

V

In 2019, we participated in a series of important events, which
served as platforms through which we were able to challenge
long-held views about our company and industry. We also
launched #unsmokeyourworld with the mission of starting
conversations about a better future for the world’s 1.1 billion
smokers. Our message was and remains: If you don’t smoke,
don’t start. If you smoke, quit. If you don’t quit, change.
Building on these efforts, in early 2020 we unveiled#unsmokeyourmind – our campaign directed at decisionmakers, scientists, regulators and politicians to challenge
misconceptions of, and open minds to, the better alternatives
to combustible tobacco that science and technology havemade available. By starting conversations with policymakers
and shining light on the issues and the means to help address
them, we are moving closer to achieving the regulatory
frameworks needed to deliver a smoke-free future.

Combustible Product Portfolio
PMI is disrupting its traditional business from the inside andleading the industry by aiming for a world without cigarettes.
However, for as long as significant legitimate demand for
combustible tobacco exists, PMI will continue to sell suchproducts responsibly and seek to maintain our leadership
position internationally. In doing so, we will continue to focus
our combustible product innovation strategy on fewer andmore impactful initiatives, while consolidating and simplifying
our portfolio.
2019 saw robust performance from our combustible
tobacco portfolio, notably reflecting a like-for-like pricing
variance of 6.5% versus 2018, in line with our average annual
pricing variance since becoming a public company, andcigarette market share growth of 0.4 percentage points,
excluding China and the U.S., for our top-six international
cigarette brands.

Transforming Our Organization
In 2019 we accelerated our internal transformation,
strengthening capabilities through recruitment anddevelopment, and deploying the next phase of fundamental
changes to our operating model, structure and working
methods to further enable our people to work in an agile,collaborative and consumer-centric manner. This included
further steps toward a project-based organization and zerobased organization principles.
We also reinforced our commitment to a diverse andinclusive workforce that reflects modern society. Our

VVefforts were recognized in 2019 when we became the firstmultinational company to achieve global EQUAL-SALARY
certification, an independent verification that PMI pays womenand men equal pay for equal work in every market where weare located.
The transformation of our company relies on the talentand relentless efforts of our employees. As we transition
to a smoke-free future, this entails adjustments to ourmanufacturing footprint and overall organizational design.
As always, we commit to treating our employees with therespect, dignity, care and fairness that they deserve in theface of such changes.
Finally, our business transformation – both internal andexternal – would not be possible without the tremendous
experience of our Board of Directors, whose relationship withmanagement continues to be governed by transparency,
openness, trust and collaboration. Our heartfelt gratitude
goes out to the two Directors who have decided not to standfor re-election this year and will retire from the Board: Mr.
Massimo Ferragamo, a Director since 2016, and Mr. Stephen M.
Wolf, who has been on the Board since we became a publiccompany. They have been exemplary Directors, providing
invaluable service and years of dedicated commitment toour company.

Looking Ahead
We have no doubt that the historic opportunity for smokefree products to sustainably accelerate our business growthand generously reward shareholders is undiminished. This
opportunity is increasingly tangible as we witness the criticalrole that these products can play in improving the lives of adultsmokers across markets. And thanks to our industry-leading
combustible tobacco portfolio, we remain exceptionally
positioned to continue investing in the transformation of ourcompany and the development of the products necessary todeliver a smoke-free future, to the benefit of adult smokers,
society, the company and its shareholders.

André Calantzopoulos,
Chief Executive Officer

Louis C. Camilleri,
Chairman of the Board

March 6, 20203

Board of Directors
André Calantzopoulos

Lisa A. Hook 2,3,5

Louis C. Camilleri

Jennifer Li 1,3,4Chief Executive Officer
Director since 2013

Chief Executive Officer,
Ferrari N.V.
Director since 2008

Massimo Ferragamo* 1,3,4,5
Chairman,
Ferragamo USA Inc.
Director since 2016

Werner Geissler

1,2,3,5Operating Partner,
Advent International
Director since 2015

Businesswoman
Director since 2018
Chief Executive Officer
and Managing Partner,
Changcheng
Investment Partners
Director since 2010

Lucio A. Noto 1,2,3,4

Managing Partner,
Midstream Partners, LLC
Director since 2008

Frederik Paulsen 3,5Chairman, Ferring Group
Director since 2014

Robert B. Polet 2,3,4,5

Retired Businessman
Director since 2014

Chairman, Rituals Cosmetics
Enterprise B.V.
Chairman, Arica Holding B.V.
Director since 2011

Kalpana Morparia 3,4,5

Stephen M. Wolf* 1,2,3,4,5

Jun Makihara 1,3,5

Chairman,South and South East Asia,
J.P. Morgan Chase
Director since 2011

Managing Partner,
Alpilles, LLC
Director since 2008

Board and Committee
Leadership

Chairman of the Board,Louis C. Camilleri
Presiding Director, Lucio A. Noto
1
Member of Audit Committee,
Jennifer Li, Chair
2
Member of Compensation andLeadership Development
Committee,
Werner Geissler, Chair
3
Member of Finance Committee,
Jun Makihara, Chair
4
Member of Nominating andCorporate GovernanceCommittee,
Kalpana Morparia, Chair
5
Member of Product Innovation
and Regulatory Affairs
Committee,
Frederik Paulsen, Chair

Company Management
André Calantzopoulos
Chief Executive Officer

Massimo Andolina

Senior Vice President,
Operations

Drago Azinovic

President, Middle East & Africa
Region and PMI Duty Free

Werner BarthFrederic de Wilde
President, European
Union Region

Marc S. Firestone

President, External Affairs& General Counsel

Stacey Kennedy

President, South &Southeast Asia Region

Senior Vice President,
Commercial

Martin G. King**

Charles Bendotti

Michael Kunst

Global Head,
People & CultureFrank de Rooij

Vice President,
Treasury & Corporate Finance

Chief Financial Officer
Senior Vice President,
Commercial Transformation

Andreas Kurali

Vice President and Controller

Bin Li

Chief Product Officer

Marco Mariotti

President, Eastern Europe Region

Mario Masseroli

Marian Salzman

Senior Vice President,
Global Communications

Jaime Suarez

Chief Digital Officer

President, Latin America& Canada Region

Michael Voegele

Deepak Mishra

Stefano Volpetti

Jacek Olczak

Jerry Whitson

Chief Strategy Officer
Chief Operating Officer

John O’Mullane

Chief Life Sciences Officer

Paul Riley

Chief Technology Officer
Chief Consumer Officer
Deputy General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary

Miroslaw Zielinski

Chief New Ventures Officer

President, East Asia
& Australia Region* Not standing for re-election in 2020.
** On February 28, 2020, Emmanuel Babeau was appointed to succeed Martin G. King as Chief Financial Officer, effective May 1, 2020. Mr. King		 will assume the role of CEO, PMI America, effective May 1, 2020.

4

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromtoCommission File Number: 001-33708

PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia

13-3435103(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

120 Park Avenue
New York
New York

10017(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)917-663-2000(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, no par value
2.000% Notes due 2020
Floating Notes due 2020
1.750% Notes due 2020
4.500% Notes due 2020
1.875% Notes due 2021
1.875% Notes due 2021
4.125% Notes due 2021
2.900% Notes due 2021
2.625% Notes due 2022
2.375% Notes due 2022
2.500% Notes due 2022
2.500% Notes due 2022
2.625% Notes due 2023

Trading Symbol(s)
PM
PM20B
PM20C
PM20A
PM20
PM21B
PM21C
PM21
PM21A
PM22A
PM22B
PM22
PM22C
PM23

Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange

2.125% Notes due 2023
3.600% Notes due 2023
2.875% Notes due 2024
2.875% Notes due 2024
0.625% Notes due 2024

PM23B
PM23A
PM24
PM24C
PM24B

New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock ExchangeTitle of each class3.250% Notes due 2024
2.750% Notes due 2025
3.375% Notes due 2025
2.750% Notes due 2026
2.875% Notes due 2026
0.125% Notes due 2026
3.125% Notes due 2027
3.125% Notes due 2028
2.875% Notes due 2029
3.375% Notes due 2029
0.800% Notes due 2031
3.125% Notes due 2033
2.000% Notes due 2036

Trading Symbol(s)
PM24A
PM25
PM25A
PM26A
PM26
PM26B
PM27
PM28
PM29
PM29A
PM31
PM33
PM36

Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange

1.875% Notes due 2037
6.375% Notes due 2038
1.450% Notes due 2039
4.375% Notes due 2041
4.500% Notes due 2042
3.875% Notes due 2042
4.125% Notes due 2043
4.875% Notes due 2043
4.250% Notes due 2044

PM37A
PM38
PM39
PM41
PM42
PM42A
PM43
PM43A
PM44

New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes

No
No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit such files). Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,”and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer

Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes

No

As of June 30, 2019, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately$122 billion based on the closing sale price of the common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

ClassCommon Stock,no par value

Outstanding at January 31, 2020
1,555,911,930 shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for use in connection with its annual
meeting of shareholders to be held on May 6, 2020, to be filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (“SEC”) on or about March 26, 2020.

Parts Into Which Incorporated

Part IIITABLE OF CONTENTS
PagePART I
Item 1.

Business1

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

5

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

10

Item 2.

Properties

10

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

11

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

11

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities

11

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

14

Item 7.

15

Item 7A.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

53

Item 9.

114

Item 9A.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures

Item 9B.

Other Information

114

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

115

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

116

Item 12.

116

Item 13.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

117

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

118

PART II
Item 5.

52

114

PART III117

PART IV
Item 15.
Signatures
In this report, “PMI,” “we,” “us” and “our” refers to Philip Morris International Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Trademarks and service marks in this report are the registered property of, or licensed by, the subsidiaries of Philip MorrisInternational Inc. and are italicized.

123

PART I
Item 1.

Business.

General Development of Business
GeneralPhilip Morris International Inc. is a Virginia holding company incorporated in 1987. We are a leading international tobacco company
engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes, smoke-free products and associated electronic devices and accessories, and othernicotine-containing products in markets outside the United States of America. In addition, we ship a version of our Platform 1 device
and its consumables authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") to Altria Group, Inc., for sale in the United States
under license.
We are leading a transformation in the tobacco industry to create a smoke-free future, based on a new category of reduced-risk products
that, while not risk free, are a much better choice than continuing to smoke. Our goal is to ultimately replace cigarettes with smoke-free
products to the benefit of adults who would otherwise continue to smoke, society, the company and its shareholders.
Reduced-risk products ("RRPs") is the term we use to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present
less risk of harm to smokers who switch to these products versus continuing smoking. We have a range of RRPs in various stages ofdevelopment, scientific assessment and commercialization. Because our RRPs do not burn tobacco, they produce an aerosol that contains
far lower quantities of harmful and potentially harmful constituents than found in cigarette smoke. Through multidisciplinary capabilities
in product development, state-of-the-art facilities and scientific substantiation, we aim to ensure that our RRPs meet adult consumer
preferences and rigorous regulatory requirements.
Our IQOS smoke-free product brand portfolio includes heated tobacco and nicotine-containing vapor products. Our leading smoke-free
platform ("Platform 1") is a precisely controlled device into which a specially designed heated tobacco unit is inserted and heated togenerate an aerosol. We market our heated tobacco units under the brand names HEETS, HEETS Marlboro and HEETS FROMMARLBORO, defined collectively as HEETS, as well as Marlboro HeatSticks and Parliament HeatSticks. Platform 1 was first introduced
in Nagoya, Japan, in 2014. As of December 31, 2019, Platform 1 is available for sale in 52 markets in key cities or nationwide.
Our cigarettes are sold in more than 180 markets, and in many of these markets they hold the number one or number two market shareposition. We have a wide range of premium, mid-price and low-price brands. Our portfolio comprises both international and local brands
and is led by Marlboro, the world’s best-selling international cigarette, which accounted for approximately 37% of our total 2019 cigarette
shipment volume. Marlboro is complemented in the premium-price category by Parliament. Our other leading international cigarettebrands are Bond Street, Chesterfield, L&M, Lark and Philip Morris. These seven international cigarette brands contributed approximately
78% of our cigarette shipment volume in 2019. We also own a number of important local cigarette brands, such as Dji Sam Soe, Sampoerna
A and Sampoerna U in Indonesia, and Fortune and Jackpot in the Philippines.
Source of Funds — Dividends
We are a legal entity separate and distinct from our direct and indirect subsidiaries. Accordingly, our right, and thus the right of ourcreditors and stockholders, to participate in any distribution of the assets or earnings of any subsidiary is subject to the prior rights ofcreditors of such subsidiary, except to the extent that claims of our company itself as a creditor may be recognized. As a holding company,
our principal sources of funds, including funds to make payment on our debt securities, are from the receipt of dividends and repayment
of debt from our subsidiaries. Our principal wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries currently are not limited by long-term debt
or other agreements in their ability to pay cash dividends or to make other distributions with respect to their common stock that areotherwise compliant with law.
Description of BusinessWe manage our business in six operating segments as follows:•

The European Union Region (“EU”) is headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, and covers all the European Union countries
and also Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and the United Kingdom;•

The Eastern Europe Region (“EE”) is also headquartered in Lausanne and includes Southeast Europe, Central Asia, Ukraine,
Israel and Russia;
1

•The Middle East & Africa Region (“ME&A”) is also headquartered in Lausanne and covers the African continent, the Middle
East, Turkey and our international duty free business;•

The South & Southeast Asia Region (“S&SA”) is headquartered in Hong Kong and includes Indonesia, the Philippines and othermarkets in this region;•

The East Asia & Australia Region (“EA&A”) is also headquartered in Hong Kong and includes Australia, Japan, South Korea,
the People's Republic of China and other markets in this region, as well as Malaysia and Singapore; and•The Latin America & Canada Region (“LA&C”) is headquartered in New York and covers the South American continent, Central
America, Mexico, the Caribbean and Canada. LA&C also includes transactions under license with Altria Group, Inc., for the
distribution of our Platform 1 product in the United States.

As of March 22, 2019, we deconsolidated the financial results of our Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH")
from our financial statements. For further details, see Item 8, Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH.
Following the deconsolidation of our Canadian subsidiary, we will continue to report the volume of brands sold by RBH for which other
PMI subsidiaries are the trademark owners. These include HEETS, Next, Philip Morris and Rooftop, which together accounted forapproximately 40% of RBH's total shipment volume in 2018.
References to total international market, defined as worldwide cigarette and heated tobacco unit volume excluding the United States,
total industry, total market and market shares in this Form 10-K are our estimates for tax-paid products based on the latest available datafrom a number of internal and external sources and may, in defined instances, exclude the People's Republic of China and/or our duty
free business. In addition, to reflect the deconsolidation of RBH, effective March 22, 2019, PMI's total market share has been restatedfor previous periods.
Our total shipments, including cigarettes and heated tobacco units, decreased by 2.0% in 2019 to 766.4 billion units. We estimate thatinternational industry volumes, including cigarettes and heated tobacco units, were approximately 5.1 trillion units in 2019, a 0.9%
decrease from 2018. Excluding the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), we estimate that international cigarette and heated tobacco unit
volume was 2.7 trillion units in 2019, a 2.0% decrease from 2018. We estimate that our reported share of the international market (which
is defined as worldwide cigarette and heated tobacco unit volume, excluding the United States of America) was approximately 15.1% in2019, 15.2% in 2018 and 15.1% in 2017. Excluding the PRC, we estimate that our reported share of the international market wasapproximately 28.4%, 28.3%, and 27.8% in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Shipments of our principal cigarette brand, Marlboro, decreased by 0.6% in 2019 and represented approximately 10.0% of the international
cigarette market, excluding the PRC, in 2019, 9.7% in 2018 and 9.7% in 2017.
Total shipment volume of heated tobacco units reached 59.7 billion units in 2019, up from 41.4 billion units in 2018.
We have a market share of at least 15% and, in a number of instances, substantially more than 15%, in approximately 95 markets,
including Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, the Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary,Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Kuwait, Mexico, the Netherlands, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Saudi
Arabia, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey and Ukraine.

2Distribution & Sales
Our main types of distribution are tailored to the characteristics of each market and are often used simultaneously:
•
•
•
•
•

Direct sales and distribution, where we have set up our own distribution selling directly to the retailers (including gas
stations and other key accounts);
Distribution through independent distributors that often distribute other fast-moving consumer goods and are responsiblefor distribution in a particular market;
Exclusive zonified distribution, where the distributors are dedicated to us in tobacco products distribution and assigned
to exclusive territories within a market;
Distribution through national or regional wholesalers that then supply the retail trade; andOur own brand retail and e-commerce infrastructures for our RRP products and accessories.

Competition
We are subject to highly competitive conditions in all aspects of our business. We compete primarily on the basis of product quality,
brand recognition, brand loyalty, taste, R&D, innovation, packaging, customer service, marketing, advertising and retail price and,increasingly, adult smoker willingness to convert to our RRPs. In the combustible product category, we predominantly sell American
blend cigarette brands, such as Marlboro, L&M, Parliament, Philip Morris and Chesterfield, which are the most popular across many ofour markets. In the RRP product category, we predominantly sell Platform 1 devices and heated tobacco units under the IQOS brandumbrella. We seek to compete in all profitable retail price categories, although our brand portfolio is weighted towards the premiumprice category.
The competitive environment and our competitive position can be significantly influenced by weak economic conditions, erosion of
consumer confidence, competitors' introduction of lower-price products or innovative products, higher tobacco product taxes, higher
absolute prices and larger gaps between retail price categories, and product regulation that diminishes the ability to differentiate tobacco
products and restricts adult consumer access to truthful and non-misleading information about our RRPs. Competitors include three large
international tobacco companies, new market entrants, particularly with respect to innovative products, several regional and local tobaccocompanies and, in some instances, state-owned tobacco enterprises, principally in Algeria, Egypt, the PRC, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.
Industry consolidation and privatizations of state-owned enterprises have led to an overall increase in competitive pressures. Some
competitors have different profit and volume objectives, and some international competitors are susceptible to changes in different
currency exchange rates. Certain new market entrants may alienate consumers from innovative products through inappropriate marketing
campaigns and messaging and inferior product satisfaction, while not relying on scientific substantiation based on appropriate R&D
protocols and standards. The growing use of digital media could increase the speed and extent of the dissemination of inaccurate andmisleading information about our RRPs.
Procurement and Raw Materials
We purchase tobacco leaf of various types, grades and styles throughout the world, mostly through independent tobacco suppliers. In
2019, we also contracted directly with farmers in several countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Italy, Pakistan, thePhilippines and Poland. In 2019, direct sourcing from farmers represented approximately 23% of PMI’s global leaf requirements. The
largest supplies of tobacco leaf are sourced from Argentina, Brazil, China, Italy, Indonesia (mostly for domestic use in kretek products),
Malawi, Mozambique, the Philippines, Turkey and the United States.
We believe that there is an adequate supply of tobacco leaf in the world markets to satisfy our current and anticipated production
requirements.
In addition to tobacco leaf, we purchase a wide variety of direct materials from a total of approximately 400 suppliers. In 2019, our top
ten suppliers of direct materials combined represented approximately 50% of our total direct materials purchases. The three most significant
direct materials that we purchase are printed paper board used in packaging, acetate tow used in filter making and fine paper used in the
manufacturing of cigarettes and heated tobacco units. In addition, the adequate supply and procurement of cloves are of particularimportance to our Indonesian business.
The adequate supply chain for our RRP portfolio, including the supply of electronic devices, is important to our business. We work withtwo electronics manufacturing service providers for the supply of our Platform 1 devices and a small number of other providers for otherproducts in our RRP portfolio and related accessories. Although we work closely with these service providers on monitoring their3

production capability and financial health, the commercialization of our RRPs could be adversely affected if they are unable to meet theircommitments. The production of our RRP portfolio requires various metals, and we believe that there is an adequate supply of suchmetals in the world markets to satisfy our current and anticipated production requirements. However, some components and materials
necessary for the production of our RRPs are obtained from single or limited sources, and can be subject to industry-wide shortages andprice fluctuations. Our inability to secure an adequate supply of such components and materials could negatively impact thecommercialization of our RRPs.
Our IQOS devices are subject to product warranties, which are described in more detail in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Item 8”) in Note 5. Product Warranty to our consolidated financial statements. We discuss
our RRP products in more detail in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Item 7”) in Business Environment—Reduced-Risk Products.
Business Environment
Information called for by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to the paragraphs in Item 7, Business Environment.
Other Matters
Customers
As described in more detail in “Distribution & Sales” above, in many of our markets we sell our products to distributors. In 2019, sales
to a distributor in the European Union Region and a distributor in the East Asia & Australia Region each amounted to 10 percent or moreof our consolidated net revenues. See Item 8, Note 12. Segment Reporting for more information. We believe that none of our businesssegments is dependent upon a single customer or a few customers, the loss of which would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
results of operations. In some of our markets, particularly in the European Union and in the East Asia & Australia Regions, a loss of a
distributor may result in a temporary market disruption.
Employees
At December 31, 2019, we employed approximately 73,500 people worldwide, including full-time, temporary and part-time staff. Our
businesses are subject to a number of laws and regulations relating to our relationship with our employees. Generally, these laws andregulations are specific to the location of each business. In addition, in accordance with European Union requirements, we have establisheda European Works Council composed of management and elected members of our workforce. We believe that our relations with our
employees and their representative organizations are excellent.
Information About Our Executive Officers
The disclosure regarding executive officers is hereby incorporated by reference to the discussion under the heading “Information about
our Executive Officers as of February 6, 2020” in Part III, Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K (“Item 10”).
Intellectual Property
Our trademarks are valuable assets, and their protection and reputation are essential to us. We own the trademark rights to all of ourprincipal brands, including Marlboro, HEETS and IQOS, or have the right to use them in all countries where we use them.
In addition, we have a large number of granted patents and pending patent applications worldwide. Our patent portfolio, as a whole, ismaterial to our business. However, no one patent, or group of related patents, is material to us. We also have registered industrial designs,
as well as unregistered proprietary trade secrets, technology, know-how, processes and other unregistered intellectual property rights.
Effective January 1, 2008, PMI entered into an Intellectual Property Agreement with Philip Morris USA Inc. (“PM USA”), a wholly
owned subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc. The Intellectual Property Agreement allocates ownership of jointly funded intellectual property
as follows:•

PMI owns all rights to jointly funded intellectual property outside the United States, its territories and possessions; and4

•

PM USA owns all rights to jointly funded intellectual property in the United States, its territories and possessions.

The parties agreed to submit disputes under the Intellectual Property Agreement first to negotiation between senior executives and thento binding arbitration.
Seasonality
Our business segments are not significantly affected by seasonality, although in certain markets cigarette consumption trends may riseduring the summer months due to outdoor use, longer daylight, and tourism.
Environmental Regulation
We are subject to international, national and local environmental laws and regulations in the countries in which we do business. We havespecific programs across our business units designed to meet applicable environmental compliance requirements and reduce our carbon
footprint and wastage as well as water and energy consumption. We report externally about our climate change mitigation strategy,
together with associated targets and results in reducing our carbon footprint, through CDP (formerly, the Carbon Disclosure Project), theleading international non-governmental organization assessing the work of thousands of companies worldwide in the area of environmental
impact, including climate change. Our environmental and occupational health and safety management system includes policies, standardpractices and procedures at all our manufacturing centers. We also conduct regular safety assessments at our offices, warehouses and car
fleet organizations. Furthermore, we have engaged an external certification body to validate the effectiveness of this management systemat our manufacturing centers around the world, in accordance with internationally recognized standards for safety and environmental
management. The environmental performance data we report externally is also verified by a qualified third party. Our subsidiaries expect
to continue to make investments in order to drive improved performance and maintain compliance with environmental laws and regulations.
We assess and report the compliance status of all our legal entities on a regular basis. Based on the management and controls we have inplace and our review of climate change risks (both physical and regulatory), environmental expenditures have not had, and are not expected
to have, a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, capital expenditures, financial position, earnings or competitive
position.
Available Information
We are required to file with the SEC annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information required by the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The SEC maintains an Internet website at http://www.sec.gov that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, fromwhich investors can electronically access our SEC filings.
We make available free of charge on, or through, our website at www.pmi.com our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Investors canaccess our filings with the SEC by visiting www.pmi.com.
The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this report or incorporated into any other filings we makewith the SEC.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

The following risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating our business and the forward-looking statements
contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, our operating
results, our financial condition and the actual outcome of matters as to which forward-looking statements are made in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K.
Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements
We may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC, in reports to stockholders and in press releases and investor webcasts. You can identify theseforward-looking statements by use of words such as "strategy," "expects," "continues," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "will,""estimates," "intends," "projects," "goals," "targets" and other words of similar meaning. You can also identify them by the fact that they
do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.
5We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized, although we believe we have been prudent in our plans andassumptions. Our RRPs constitute a new product category in its early stages that is less predictable than our mature cigarette business.
Achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or
projected. Investors should bear this in mind as they consider forward-looking statements and whether to invest in or remain invested inour securities. In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we are identifying
important factors that, individually or in the aggregate, could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those containedin any forward-looking statements made by us; any such statement is qualified by reference to the following cautionary statements. We
elaborate on these and other risks we face throughout this document, particularly in Item 7, Business Environment. You should understandthat it is not possible to predict or identify all risk factors. Consequently, you should not consider the following to be a complete discussionof all potential risks or uncertainties. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that we may make from time to time,
except in the normal course of our public disclosure obligations.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry•

Consumption of tax-paid cigarettes continues to decline in many of our markets.

This decline is due to multiple factors, including increased taxes and pricing, governmental actions, the diminishing social acceptanceof smoking, continuing economic and geopolitical uncertainty, and the continuing prevalence of illicit products. These factors and theirpotential consequences are discussed more fully below and in Item 7, Business Environment.
•

Cigarettes are subject to substantial taxes. Significant increases in cigarette-related taxes have been proposed or enacted andare likely to continue to be proposed or enacted in numerous jurisdictions. These tax increases may disproportionately affectour profitability and make us less competitive versus certain of our competitors.

Tax regimes, including excise taxes, sales taxes and import duties, can disproportionately affect the retail price of cigarettes versus othercombustible tobacco products, or disproportionately affect the relative retail price of our cigarette brands versus cigarette brands
manufactured by certain of our competitors. Because our portfolio is weighted toward the premium-price cigarette category, tax regimes
based on sales price can place us at a competitive disadvantage in certain markets. As a result, our volume and profitability may be
adversely affected in these markets.
Increases in cigarette taxes are expected to continue to have an adverse impact on our sales of cigarettes, due to resulting lower consumption
levels, a shift in sales from manufactured cigarettes to other combustible tobacco products and from the premium-price to the mid-priceor low-price cigarette categories, where we may be under-represented, from local sales to legal cross-border purchases of lower priceproducts, or to illicit products such as contraband, counterfeit and "illicit whites."•

Our business faces significant governmental action aimed at increasing regulatory requirements with the goal of reducing
or preventing the use of tobacco products.

Governmental actions, combined with the diminishing social acceptance of smoking and private actions to restrict smoking, have resulted
in reduced industry volume in many of our markets, and we expect that such factors will continue to reduce consumption levels and will
increase down-trading and the risk of counterfeiting, contraband, "illicit whites" and legal cross-border purchases. Significant regulatory
developments will continue to take place over the next few years in most of our markets, driven principally by the World HealthOrganization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (“FCTC”). Since it came into force in 2005, the FCTC has led to increased
efforts by tobacco control advocates and public health organizations to promote increasingly restrictive regulatory measures on themarketing and sale of tobacco products to adult smokers. Regulatory initiatives that have been proposed, introduced or enacted include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

restrictions on or licensing of outlets permitted to sell cigarettes;
the levying of substantial and increasing tax and duty charges;
restrictions or bans on advertising, marketing and sponsorship;
the display of larger health warnings, graphic health warnings and other labeling requirements;
restrictions on packaging design, including the use of colors, and plain packaging;
restrictions on packaging and cigarette formats and dimensions;
restrictions or bans on the display of tobacco product packaging at the point of sale and restrictions or bans on cigarette vending
machines;
6

•
•
•
•
•
•
•

requirements regarding testing, disclosure and performance standards for tar, nicotine, carbon monoxide and other smoke
constituents;
disclosure, restrictions, or bans of tobacco product ingredients;
increased restrictions on smoking in public and work places and, in some instances, in private places and outdoors;
regulation, restrictions or prohibitions of novel tobacco or nicotine-containing products;
elimination of duty free sales and duty free allowances for travelers;
encouraging litigation against tobacco companies; andexcluding tobacco companies from transparent public dialogue regarding public health and other policy matters.

Our financial results could be significantly affected by regulatory initiatives resulting in a significant decrease in demand for our brands,
in particular requirements that lead to a commoditization of tobacco products or impede adult consumers' ability to convert to our RRPs,
as well as any significant increase in the cost of complying with new regulatory requirements.
•

Litigation related to tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke could substantially reduce our profitability
and could severely impair our liquidity.

There is litigation related to tobacco products pending in certain jurisdictions. Damages claimed in some tobacco-related litigation are
significant and, in certain cases in Brazil, Canada, and Nigeria, range into the billions of U.S. dollars. We anticipate that new cases willcontinue to be filed. The FCTC encourages litigation against tobacco product manufacturers. It is possible that our consolidated resultsof operations, cash flows or financial position could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable
outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation. See Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements for a
discussion of pending litigation and Item 7, Business Environment—Reduced-Risk Products (RRPs)—Legal Challenges to RRPs.
•

We face intense competition, and our failure to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on our profitability
and results of operations.

We compete primarily on the basis of product quality, brand recognition, brand loyalty, taste, R&D, innovation, packaging, customer
service, marketing, advertising and retail price and, increasingly, adult smoker willingness to convert to our RRPs. We are subject tohighly competitive conditions in all aspects of our business. The competitive environment and our competitive position can be significantly
influenced by weak economic conditions, erosion of consumer confidence, competitors' introduction of lower-price products or innovative
products, higher tobacco product taxes, higher absolute prices and larger gaps between retail price categories, and product regulation thatdiminishes the ability to differentiate tobacco products and restricts adult consumer access to truthful and non-misleading information
about our RRPs. Competitors include three large international tobacco companies, new market entrants, particularly with respect toinnovative products, several regional and local tobacco companies and, in some instances, state-owned tobacco enterprises, principallyin Algeria, Egypt, the PRC, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam. Industry consolidation and privatizations of state-owned enterprises have led
to an overall increase in competitive pressures. Some competitors have different profit and volume objectives, and some international
competitors are susceptible to changes in different currency exchange rates. Certain new market entrants may alienate consumers frominnovative products through inappropriate marketing campaigns and messaging and inferior product satisfaction, while not relying on
scientific substantiation based on appropriate R&D protocols and standards. The growing use of digital media could increase the speed
and extent of the dissemination of inaccurate and misleading information about our RRPs.
•

Because we have operations in numerous countries, our results may be influenced by economic, regulatory and politicaldevelopments, natural disasters, pandemics or conflicts.

Some of the countries in which we operate face the threat of civil unrest and can be subject to regime changes. In others, nationalization,
terrorism, conflict and the threat of war may have a significant impact on the business environment. Natural disasters, pandemics,
economic, political, regulatory or other developments could disrupt our supply chain, manufacturing capabilities or distribution
capabilities. In addition, such developments could lead to loss of property or equipment that are critical to our business in certain markets
and difficulty in staffing and managing our operations, which could reduce our volumes, revenues and net earnings.
In certain markets, we are dependent on governmental approvals of various actions such as price changes, and failure to obtain suchapprovals could impair growth of our profitability.
In addition, despite our high ethical standards and rigorous control and compliance procedures aimed at preventing and detecting unlawful
conduct, given the breadth and scope of our international operations, we may not be able to detect all potential improper or unlawful
conduct by our employees and partners.

7

•

We may be unable to anticipate changes in adult consumer preferences.

Our business is subject to changes in adult consumer preferences, which may be influenced by local economic conditions. To be successful,
we must:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

promote brand equity successfully;
anticipate and respond to new adult consumer trends;
develop new products and markets and broaden brand portfolios;
improve productivity;
convince adult smokers to convert to our RRPs;
ensure adequate production capacity to meet demand for our products; andbe able to protect or enhance margins through price increases.

In periods of economic uncertainty, adult consumers may tend to purchase lower-price brands, and the volume of our premium-price andmid-price brands and our profitability could suffer accordingly. Such down-trading trends may be reinforced by regulation that limits
branding, communication and product differentiation.
•

The financial and business performance of our reduced-risk products is less predictable than our cigarette business.

Our RRPs are novel products in a new category, and the pace at which adult smokers adopt them may vary, depending on the competitive,
regulatory, fiscal and cultural environment, and other factors in a specific market. There may be periods of accelerated growth and periodsof slower growth for these products, the timing and drivers of which may be more difficult for us to predict versus our mature cigarettebusiness. The impact of this lower predictability on our projected results for a specific period may be significant, particularly during theearly stages of this new product category.
•We lose revenues as a result of counterfeiting, contraband, cross-border purchases, “illicit whites,” non-tax-paid volume
produced by local manufacturers, and counterfeiting of our Platform 1 device and heated tobacco units.

Large quantities of counterfeit cigarettes are sold in the international market. We believe that Marlboro is the most heavily counterfeitedinternational cigarette brand, although we cannot quantify the revenues we lose as a result of this activity. In addition, our revenues are
reduced by contraband, legal cross-border purchases, “illicit whites” and non-tax-paid volume produced by local manufacturers. Ourrevenues and consumer satisfaction with our Platform 1 device and heated tobacco units may be adversely affected by counterfeit productsthat do not meet our product quality standards and scientific validation procedures.
•

From time to time, we are subject to governmental investigations on a range of matters.

Investigations include allegations of contraband shipments of cigarettes, allegations of unlawful pricing activities within certain markets,allegations of underpayment of income taxes, customs duties and/or excise taxes, allegations of false and misleading usage of descriptors,
allegations of unlawful advertising, and allegations of unlawful labor practices. We cannot predict the outcome of those investigations
or whether additional investigations may be commenced, and it is possible that our business could be materially affected by an unfavorable
outcome of pending or future investigations. See Item, 8, Note 18. Contingencies—Other Litigation and Item 7, Business Environment—Governmental Investigations for a description of certain governmental investigations to which we are subject.
•

We may be unsuccessful in our attempts to introduce reduced-risk products, and regulators may not permit thecommercialization of these products or the communication of scientifically substantiated risk-reduction claims.

Our key strategic priorities are: to develop and commercialize products that present less risk of harm to adult smokers who switch tothose products versus continued smoking; and to convince current adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke to switch tothose RRPs. For our efforts to be successful, we must: develop RRPs that such adult smokers find acceptable alternatives to smoking;conduct rigorous scientific studies to substantiate that they reduce exposure to harmful and potentially harmful constituents in smoke
and, ultimately, that these products present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to adult smokers who
switch to them versus continued smoking; and effectively advocate for the development of science-based regulatory frameworks forthe development and commercialization of RRPs, including communication of scientifically substantiated information to enable adultsmokers to make better consumer choices. We might not succeed in our efforts. If we do not succeed, but others do, or if heat-not-burnproducts are inequitably regulated compared to other RRP categories without regard to the totality of the scientific evidence available
for such products, we may be at a competitive disadvantage. In addition, actions of some market entrants, such as the inappropriate
marketing of e-vapor products to youth, as well as alleged health consequences associated with the use of certain e-vapor products, may
unfavorably impact public opinion and/or mischaracterize all e-vapor products or other RRPs to consumers, regulators and policy makers
8without regard to the totality of scientific evidence for specific products. This may impede our efforts to advocate for the developmentof science-based regulatory frameworks for the development and commercialization of RRPs. We cannot predict whether regulators will
permit the sale and/or marketing of RRPs with scientifically substantiated risk-reduction claims. Such restrictions could limit the successof our RRPs. Moreover, the FDA’s premarket tobacco product authorization of a version of our Platform 1 product is subject to strict
marketing, reporting and other requirements and is not a guarantee that the product will remain authorized, particularly if there is asignificant uptake in youth initiation.
•

We may be unsuccessful in our efforts to differentiate reduced-risk products and cigarettes with respect to taxation.

To date, we have been largely successful in demonstrating to regulators that our RRPs are not cigarettes, and as such they are generally
taxed either as a separate category or as other tobacco products, which typically yields more favorable tax rates than cigarettes. If wecease to be successful in these efforts, RRP unit margins may be adversely affected.
•

Our reported results could be adversely affected by unfavorable currency exchange rates, and currency devaluations could
impair our competitiveness.

We conduct our business primarily in local currency and, for purposes of financial reporting, the local currency results are translated into
U.S. dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during a reporting period. During times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, our reported
net revenues, operating income and EPS will be reduced because the local currency translates into fewer U.S. dollars. During periods of
local economic crises, foreign currencies may be devalued significantly against the U.S. dollar, reducing our margins. Actions to recover
margins may result in lower volume and a weaker competitive position.
•

Changes in the earnings mix and changes in tax laws may result in significant variability in our effective tax rates. Our ability
to receive payments from foreign subsidiaries or to repatriate royalties and dividends could be restricted by local country
currency exchange controls.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was signed into law in December 2017 constitutes a major change to the U.S. tax system. Our estimatedimpact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is based on management’s current interpretations, and our analysis is ongoing. Our final tax liability
may be materially different from current estimates due to developments such as implementing regulations and clarifications. In future
periods, our effective tax rate and our ability to recover deferred tax assets could be subject to additional uncertainty as a result of suchdevelopments. Furthermore, changes in the earnings mix or applicable foreign tax laws may result in significant variability in our effective
tax rates. Because we are a U.S. holding company, our most significant source of funds is distributions from our non-U.S. subsidiaries.
Certain countries in which we operate have adopted or could institute currency exchange controls that limit or prohibit our local subsidiaries'
ability to convert local currency into U.S. dollars or to make payments outside the country. This could subject us to the risks of local
currency devaluation and business disruption.
•

Our ability to grow profitability may be limited by our inability to introduce new products, enter new markets or improve
our margins through higher pricing and improvements in our brand and geographic mix.

Our profit growth may suffer if we are unable to introduce new products or enter new markets successfully, to raise prices or to improve
the proportion of our sales of higher margin products and in higher margin geographies.
•

We may be unable to expand our brand portfolio through successful acquisitions or the development of strategic business
relationships.

One element of our growth strategy is to strengthen our brand portfolio and market positions through selective acquisitions and thedevelopment of strategic business relationships. Acquisition and strategic business development opportunities are limited and presentrisks of failing to achieve efficient and effective integration, strategic objectives and anticipated revenue improvements and cost savings.
There is no assurance that we will be able to acquire attractive businesses on favorable terms, or that future acquisitions or strategic
business developments will be accretive to earnings.
•

Government mandated prices, production control programs, shifts in crops driven by economic conditions and the impact
of climate change may increase the cost or reduce the quality of the tobacco and other agricultural products used to
manufacture our products.

As with other agricultural commodities, the price of tobacco leaf and cloves can be influenced by imbalances in supply and demand, andcrop quality can be influenced by variations in weather patterns, including those caused by climate change. Tobacco production in certain
countries is subject to a variety of controls, including government mandated prices and production control programs. Changes in the9patterns of demand for agricultural products could cause farmers to produce less tobacco or cloves. Any significant change in tobacco
leaf and clove prices, quality and quantity could affect our profitability and our business.
•

Our ability to achieve our strategic goals may be impaired if we fail to attract and retain the best global talent.

To be successful, we must continue transforming our culture and ways of working, align our talent with our business needs, innovate andtransform to a consumer-centric business. We compete for talent, including in areas that are new to us, such as digital and technicalsolutions, with companies in the consumer products, technology and other sectors that enjoy greater societal acceptance. As a result, wemay be unable to attract and retain the best global talent with the right degree of diversity, experience and skills to achieve our strategic
goals.
•

The failure of our information systems to function as intended or their penetration by outside parties with the intent to corrupt
them or our failure to comply with privacy laws and regulations could result in business disruption, litigation and regulatory
action, and loss of revenue, assets or personal or other confidential data.

We use information systems to help manage business processes, collect and interpret data and communicate internally and externallywith employees, suppliers, consumers, customers and others. Some of these information systems are managed by third-party service
providers. We have backup systems and business continuity plans in place, and we take care to protect our systems and data fromunauthorized access. Nevertheless, failure of our systems to function as intended, or penetration of our systems by outside parties intent
on extracting or corrupting information or otherwise disrupting business processes, could place us at a competitive disadvantage, resultin a loss of revenue, assets or personal or other sensitive data, litigation and regulatory action, cause damage to our reputation and thatof our brands and result in significant remediation and other costs. Failure to protect personal data, respect the rights of data subjects,
and adhere to strict cybersecurity protocols could subject us to substantial fines and other legal challenges under regulations such as the
EU General Data Protection Regulation. As we are increasingly relying on digital platforms in our business, the magnitude of these risks
is likely to increase.
•

We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, and disputes relating to intellectual property rights
could harm our business.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable assets, and their protection is important to our business. If the steps we take to protect our
intellectual property rights globally, including through a combination of trademark, design, patent and other intellectual property rights,
are inadequate, or if others infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property rights, notwithstanding legal protection, our business could
suffer. Intellectual property rights of third parties may limit our ability to introduce new products or improve the quality of existingproducts in one or more markets. Competitors or other third parties may claim that we infringe their intellectual property rights. Anysuch claims, regardless of merit, could divert management’s attention, be costly, disruptive, time-consuming and unpredictable and expose
us to litigation costs and damages, and impede our ability to manufacture and sell new products or improve existing products. If, as aresult, we are unable to manufacture or sell our RRPs or improve their quality in one or more markets, our ability to convert adult smokers
to our RRPs in such markets would be adversely affected.
•

We may be required to replace third-party contract manufacturers or service providers with our own resources.

In certain instances, we contract with third parties to manufacture some of our products or product parts or to provide other services. We
may be unable to renew these agreements on satisfactory terms for numerous reasons, including government regulations. Accordingly,
our costs may increase significantly if we must replace such third parties with our own resources.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.
We own or lease various manufacturing, office and research and development facilities in locations primarily outside the United States.
We own properties in Switzerland where our operations center and state-of-the-art research and development facility are located.

10

At December 31, 2019, we operated and owned a total of 38 manufacturing facilities across our six operating segments. Among them,
7 factories produced heated tobacco units.
In 2019, certain facilities each manufactured over 30 billion units (cigarettes and heated tobacco units combined). The largest
manufacturing facilities, in terms of volume, are located in Indonesia (S&SA), Turkey (ME&A), the Philippines (S&SA), Russia (EE),
Poland (EU), Lithuania (EU), and Italy (EU). As part of our global operating model, products manufactured in a particular manufacturing
facility are not necessarily distributed in the operating segment where the facility is located.
We have integrated the production of our heated tobacco units into a number of our existing manufacturing facilities, and we are progressing
with our plans to build manufacturing capacity for our other RRP platforms. We will continue to optimize our manufacturing infrastructure.
We believe the properties owned or leased by our subsidiaries are maintained in good condition and are believed to be suitable andadequate for our present needs.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings.

The information called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II
Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases ofEquity Securities.

The principal stock exchange on which our common stock (no par value) is listed is the New York Stock Exchange (ticker symbol "PM").
At January 31, 2020, there were approximately 50,800 holders of record of our common stock.

11

Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on PMI's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same
period of PMI's Peer Group and the S&P 500 Index. The graph assumes the investment of $100 as of December 31, 2014, in PMI common
stock (at prices quoted on the New York Stock Exchange) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends
on a quarterly basis.

Date

PMI

PMI Peer Group (1)S&P 500 Index

December 31, 2014
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019$100.00$113.40$123.10$147.60$98.60$133.00$100.00$108.20$109.70$130.20$118.30$146.40$100.00$101.40$113.50$138.30$132.20$173.90(1)

The PMI Peer Group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year. The PMI Peer Group was established based on a review of fourcharacteristics: global presence; a focus on consumer products; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of PMI. The
review also considered the primary international tobacco companies. As a result of this review, the following companies constitute the PMI Peer Group:
Altria Group, Inc., Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, British American Tobacco p.l.c., The Coca-Cola Company, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Diageo plc,
Heineken N.V., Imperial Brands PLC, Japan Tobacco Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Kimberly-Clark Corporation, The Kraft-Heinz Company, McDonald's
Corp., Mondel z International, Inc., Nestlé S.A., PepsiCo, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Company, Roche Holding AG, and Unilever NV and PLC.
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest $0.10.

12Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities During the Quarter Ended December 31, 2019
Our share repurchase activity for each of the three months in the quarter ended December 31, 2019, was as follows:

PeriodOctober 1, 2019 –October 31, 2019 (1)November 1, 2019 –November 30, 2019 (1)December 1, 2019 –December 31, 2019 (1)Pursuant to Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
October 1, 2019 –October 31, 2019 (2)November 1, 2019 –November 30, 2019 (2)December 1, 2019 –December 31, 2019 (2)For the Quarter Ended
December 31, 2019

Total
Number of
SharesRepurchased

Total Numberof Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs

Average
Price Paid
per Share

Approximate
Dollar Valueof Shares thatMay Yet be
Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs

—

$

—

—

$

—

—

$

—

—

$

—

—

$

—

—

$

—

—

$

—

897

$

75.37

690

$

81.33

1,186

$

82.69

2,773

$

79.98

(1) During this reporting period, we did not have an authorized share repurchase program.
(2) Shares repurchased represent shares tendered to us by employees who vested in restricted and performance share unit awards andused shares to pay all, or a portion of, the related taxes.

13

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data.

(in millions of dollars, except per share data)
2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

Summary of Operations:
Revenues including excise taxes
Excise taxes on products
Net revenues
Operating income
Net earnings attributable to PMI
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Dividends declared per share
Total assets
Long-term debt (1)Total debt
(1)$

77,921
48,11629,805
10,531
7,185
4.61
4.61

$

79,82350,19829,625
11,377
7,911
5.08
5.08

$

78,09849,35028,748
11,581
6,035
3.88
3.88

$

74,95348,26826,685
10,903
6,967
4.48
4.48

$

73,90847,114
26,794
10,745
6,873
4.42
4.42

4.62
42,875

4.49
39,801

4.22
42,9684.12
36,851

4.04
33,956

26,65631,04526,97531,75931,33434,33925,851
29,06725,25028,480Excluding current portion of long-term debt.

This Selected Financial Data should be read in conjunction with Item 7 and Item 8.

14

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including theconsolidated financial statements and related notes contained in Item 8, and the discussion of risks and cautionary factors that may affectfuture results in Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Description of Our Company
We are leading a transformation in the tobacco industry to create a smoke-free future and ultimately replace cigarettes with smoke-free
products to the benefit of adults who would otherwise continue to smoke, society, the company and its shareholders. We are a leadinginternational tobacco company engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes, as well as smoke-free products and associated electronic
devices and accessories, and other nicotine-containing products in markets outside the United States. In addition, we ship a version of
our Platform 1 device and its consumables authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") to Altria Group, Inc., for salein the United States under license. We are building a future on a new category of smoke-free products that, while not risk free, are amuch better choice than continuing to smoke. Through multidisciplinary capabilities in product development, state-of-the-art facilities
and scientific substantiation, we aim to ensure that our smoke-free products meet adult consumer preferences and rigorous regulatory
requirements. Our IQOS smoke-free product brand portfolio includes heat-not-burn tobacco and nicotine-containing vapor products.
We manage our business in six operating segments:•

European Union ("EU");•

Eastern Europe ("EE");•

Middle East & Africa ("ME&A"), which includes our international duty free business;•

South & Southeast Asia ("S&SA");•

East Asia & Australia ("EA&A"); and•Latin America & Canada ("LA&C"), which includes transactions under license with Altria Group, Inc. for the distribution of
our Platform 1 product in the United States.

Our cigarettes are sold in more than 180 markets, and in many of these markets they hold the number one or number two market shareposition. We have a wide range of premium, mid-price and low-price brands. Our portfolio comprises both international and local
brands. In addition to the manufacture and sale of cigarettes, we are engaged in the development and commercialization of reduced-risk
products ("RRPs"). RRPs is the term we use to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present lessrisk of harm to smokers who switch to these products versus continuing smoking.
We use the term net revenues to refer to our operating revenues from the sale of our products, including shipping and handling charges
billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. Our net revenues and operating income are affected byvarious factors, including the volume of products we sell, the price of our products, changes in currency exchange rates and the mix ofproducts we sell. Mix is a term used to refer to the proportionate value of premium-price brands to mid-price or low-price brands in any
given market (product mix). Mix can also refer to the proportion of shipment volume in more profitable markets versus shipment volume
in less profitable markets (geographic mix).
Our cost of sales consists principally of: tobacco leaf, non-tobacco raw materials, labor and manufacturing costs; shipping and handlingcosts; and the cost of the IQOS devices produced by third-party electronics manufacturing service providers. Estimated costs associatedwith IQOS warranty programs are generally provided for in cost of sales in the period the related revenues are recognized.
Our marketing, administration and research costs include the costs of marketing and selling our products, other costs generally not related
to the manufacture of our products (including general corporate expenses), and costs incurred to develop new products. The mostsignificant components of our marketing, administration and research costs are marketing and sales expenses and general andadministrative expenses.
Philip Morris International Inc. is a legal entity separate and distinct from its direct and indirect subsidiaries. Accordingly, our right,
and thus the right of our creditors and stockholders, to participate in any distribution of the assets or earnings of any subsidiary is subject
to the prior rights of creditors of such subsidiary, except to the extent that claims of our company itself as a creditor may be recognized.
As a holding company, our principal sources of funds, including funds to make payment on our debt securities, are from the receipt of15

dividends and repayment of debt from our subsidiaries. Our principal wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries currently are notlimited by long-term debt or other agreements in their ability to pay cash dividends or to make other distributions with respect to theircommon stock that are otherwise compliant with law.

Executive Summary
The following executive summary provides significant highlights from the Discussion and Analysis that follows.
Consolidated Operating Results•

Net Revenues – Net revenues of $29.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased by $0.2 billion, or 0.6%, from thecomparable 2018 amount. The change in our net revenues from the comparable 2018 amount was driven by the following (variances
not to scale with year-to-date results):

Net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 3.8%, mainly reflecting: a favorable pricing variance, notably in Germany,
Indonesia, Japan, the Philippines and Turkey; and favorable volume/mix, mainly driven by heated tobacco unit and IQOS device
volume in the EU and Russia, and heated tobacco unit volume in Japan, partly offset by unfavorable volume/mix of cigarettes,
notably in Australia, the EU, Indonesia, Japan and Russia, unfavorable heated tobacco unit volume in PMI Duty Free, and unfavorable
IQOS device volume in Japan and Korea. The currency-neutral growth in net revenues of 3.8% came despite the unfavorable impactof $763 million, shown in "Other" above, predominantly resulting from the deconsolidation of our Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans,
Benson & Hedges, Inc. ("RBH"), effective March 22, 2019. For further details on the deconsolidation of RBH, see Item 8, Note
18. Contingencies and Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH.
Net revenues by product category for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, are shown below:

16•

Diluted Earnings Per Share – The changes in our reported diluted earnings per share (“diluted EPS”) for the year ended December 31,
2019, from the comparable 2018 amounts, were as follows:

For the year ended December 31, 2018

Diluted EPS$
5.08

2018 Asset impairment and exit costs
2018 Tax items
Subtotal of 2018 items

—
0.02
0.02

2019 Asset impairment and exit costs
2019 Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense
2019 Loss on deconsolidation of RBH
2019 Russia excise and VAT audit charge
2019 Fair value adjustment for equity security investments
2019 Tax items
Subtotal of 2019 items(0.23)(0.09)(0.12)(0.20)

Currency
Interest
Change in tax rate
Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2019(0.13)% Growth(Decline)

0.02
0.04
(0.58)

0.04(0.04)
$

0.22
4.61

(9.3)%

Income taxes – The 2018 Tax items that decreased our 2018 diluted EPS by $0.02 per share in the table above represented a current
income tax charge of $185 million primarily due to an increase in our final 2017 transition tax liability, mostly offset by a deferredincome tax benefit of $154 million primarily due to the recognition of deferred tax assets for net operating losses in the state of New
York.
The 2019 Tax items that increased our 2019 diluted EPS by $0.04 per share in the table above was primarily due to a reduction inestimated U.S. federal income tax on dividend repatriation for the years 2015-2018 ($67 million).
The change in the tax rate that decreased our diluted EPS by $0.04 per share in the table above was primarily due to changes inearnings mix by taxing jurisdiction and U.S. state deferred income tax expense, partially offset by repatriation cost differences.
For further details, see Item 8, Note 11. Income Taxes.
Asset impairment and exit costs – As a part of the optimization of our global manufacturing infrastructure, we recorded pre-tax asset
impairment and exit costs of $422 million during 2019, representing $362 million net of income tax and a diluted EPS charge of$0.23 per share. This charge primarily related to a cigarette plant closure in Berlin, Germany (approximately $0.19 per share), as
well as the closure of a cigarette plant in Argentina, Colombia and Pakistan. The total pre-tax charge was included in marketing,administration and research costs on the consolidated statements of earnings. For further details, see Item 8, Note 21. Asset Impairment
and Exit Costs.
Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense – In the first quarter of 2019, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $194 million, representing$142 million net of tax, relating to the judgment against RBH in two Québec smoking and health class actions. The charge of $0.09
per share reflects our assessment of the portion of the judgment that represents probable and estimable loss prior to the deconsolidationof RBH and corresponds to the trust account deposit required by the judgment. The total pre-tax charge was included in marketing,administration and research costs on the consolidated statements of earnings and was included in the operating income of the Latin
America & Canada segment. For further details, see Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies and Item 8, Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH.

17

Loss on deconsolidation of RBH – Following the judgment in the two Québec smoking and health class actions, RBH obtained an
initial order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granting it protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act(“CCAA”), which is a Canadian federal law that permits a Canadian business to restructure its affairs while carrying on its businessin the ordinary course with minimal disruption to its customers, suppliers and employees. The administration of the CCAA process,principally relating to the powers provided to the court and the court appointed monitor, removes certain elements of control of thebusiness from both PMI and RBH. As a result, we have determined that we no longer have a controlling financial interest over RBH
and that we do not exert "significant influence" over RBH under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, we deconsolidated RBH as of the date of
the CCAA filing on March 22, 2019, and will account for our continuing investment in RBH as an equity security, without readily
determinable fair value.
A loss on the deconsolidation of RBH of $239 million was included in marketing, administration and research costs on the consolidated
statements of earnings and was included in the operating income of the Latin America & Canada segment. The $0.12 per shareimpact also included a tax benefit of $49 million within the provision for income taxes, as discussed above, related to the reversalof a deferred tax liability on the unremitted earnings of RBH. For further details, see Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies and Item 8,
Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH.
Russia excise and VAT audit charge – As a result of the final tax assessment for the 2015-2017 financial years received by our Russian
affiliate, in the third quarter of 2019, PMI recorded a pre-tax charge of $374 million in marketing, administration and research costsin the consolidated statements of earnings, representing $315 million net of income tax and a diluted EPS charge of $0.20. The pretax charge of $374 million was included in the operating income of the Eastern Europe segment. For further details, see Item 8, Note
18. Contingencies.
Fair Value adjustment for equity security investments – In the fourth quarter of 2019, PMI recorded a favorable fair value adjustment
for its equity security investments of $35 million after tax (or $0.02 per share increase in diluted EPS). The fair value adjustment
for its equity security investments was included in equity investments and securities (income)/loss, net ($44 million income) andprovision for income taxes ($9 million expense) on the consolidated statements of earnings in 2019. For further details, see Item 8,
Note 16. Fair Value Measurements.
Currency – The unfavorable currency impact during 2019 results from the fluctuations of the U.S. dollar, especially against the Euro,
Russian ruble and Turkish lira. This unfavorable currency movement has impacted our profitability across our primary revenue
markets and local currency cost bases.
Interest – The favorable impact of interest was due primarily to our ongoing efforts to optimize our capital structure following thepassage of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This included the decision to use existing cash to repay $2.5 billion and $4.0 billion of
long-term debt that matured in 2018 and in 2019, respectively.
Operations – The increase in diluted EPS of $0.22 from our operations in the table above was due primarily to the following segments:•

European Union: Favorable volume/mix and favorable pricing, partially offset by higher marketing, administration and researchcosts and higher manufacturing costs;•

South & Southeast Asia: Favorable pricing and lower manufacturing costs, partially offset by unfavorable volume/mix andhigher marketing, administration and research costs;•

Middle East & Africa: Favorable pricing, lower manufacturing costs and lower marketing, administration and research costs,
partially offset by unfavorable volume/mix; and•East Asia & Australia: Favorable pricing and lower manufacturing costs, partially offset by unfavorable volume/mix and higher
marketing, administration and research costs;

partially offset by•

Latin America & Canada: Unfavorable impact resulting from the deconsolidation of RBH, as well as unfavorable volume/mix,
partially offset by lower marketing, administration and research costs, favorable pricing and lower manufacturing costs; and•Eastern Europe: Higher marketing, administration and research costs and higher manufacturing costs, partially offset by favorable
volume/mix and favorable pricing.

For further details, see the Consolidated Operating Results and Operating Results by Business Segment sections of the following
Discussion and Analysis.
18

Discussion and Analysis
Critical Accounting Estimates
Item 8, Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements includes a summary of the significant
accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. In most instances, we must use aparticular accounting policy or method because it is the only one that is permitted under U.S. GAAP.
The preparation of financial statements requires that we use estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our assets,
liabilities, net revenues and expenses, as well as our disclosure of contingencies. If actual amounts differ from previous estimates, we
include the revisions in our consolidated results of operations in the period during which we know the actual amounts. Historically,
aggregate differences, if any, between our estimates and actual amounts in any year have not had a significant impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
The selection and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates have been discussed with our Audit Committee. The following is a
discussion of the more significant assumptions, estimates, accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements:
Revenue Recognition - We recognize revenue as performance obligations are satisfied. Our primary performance obligation is the
distribution and sales of cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products, including reduced-risk products. Our performance obligations
are typically satisfied upon shipment or delivery to our customers. The company estimates the cost of sales returns based on historicalexperience, and these estimates are immaterial. Estimated costs associated with warranty programs for IQOS devices are generally
provided for in cost of sales in the period the related revenues are recognized, based on a number of factors, including historical experience,
product failure rates and warranty policies. The transaction price is typically based on the amount billed to the customer and includes
estimated variable consideration where applicable. Such variable consideration is typically not constrained and is estimated based on
the most likely amount that PMI expects to be entitled to under the terms of the contracts with customers, historical experience of discountor rebate redemption, where relevant, and the terms of any underlying discount or rebate programs, which may change from time to timeas the business and product categories evolve.
Inventories - Our inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market based upon assumptions about future demand and market
conditions. The valuation of inventory also requires us to estimate obsolete and excess inventory. We perform regular reviews of ourinventory on hand, as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers, considering multiple factors, including demand
forecasts, product life cycle, current sales levels, pricing strategy and cost trends. If our review indicates that inventories of raw materials,
components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizablevalue, we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations.
Goodwill and Non-Amortizable Intangible Assets Valuation - We test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment
annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review. While the company has the option to perform a qualitative
assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists,
the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis. The impairment analysis involves
comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds
the fair value, goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired. To determine the fair value of goodwill, we primarily
use a discounted cash flow model, supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies
within the tobacco industry. At December 31, 2019, the carrying value of our goodwill was $5.9 billion, which is related to ten reporting
units, each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics. The estimated fair value of each of our tenreporting units exceeded the carrying value as of December 31, 2019. To determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets,
we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method. We concluded that the fair value of our nonamortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value. These discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant
for forecasting operating cash flows, which are subject to changes in business conditions, such as volumes and prices, costs to produce,
discount rates and estimated capital needs. Management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fairvalues are estimated, and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would
use. Since the March 28, 2008, spin-off from Altria Group, Inc., we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill
or non-amortizable intangible assets.
Marketing Costs - We incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising, marketing, consumer
engagement and trade promotions. The costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment
19

required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program. For volume-based incentives provided to customers,
management continually assesses and estimates, by customer, the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets, and records
the reduction of revenue as the sales are made. For other trade promotions, management relies on estimated utilization rates that havebeen developed from historical experience. Changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program
would not result in a material change in our financial position, results of operations or operating cash flows.
Employee Benefit Plans - As discussed in Item 8, Note 13. Benefit Plans to our consolidated financial statements, we provide a rangeof benefits to our employees and retired employees, including pensions, postretirement health care and postemployment benefits (primarily
severance). We record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by U.S. GAAP. These calculations include
various actuarial assumptions, such as discount rates, assumed rates of return on plan assets, compensation increases, mortality, turnoverrates and health care cost trend rates. We review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions
based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so. As permitted by U.S. GAAP, any effect of the modifications
is generally amortized over future periods. We believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans arereasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries.
Weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as
follows:
Pension plans
Postretirement plans

2019
0.83%
3.28%

2018
1.61%
3.97%

We anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2020 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $256 million ascompared with approximately $201 million in 2019, excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs.
The anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization of unrecognized actuarial gains/losses of $73 million, coupled withhigher service cost of $48 million, partially offset by lower interest cost of $49 million and higher expected return on plan assets of $18
million and other movements of $1 million.
Weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported forthe employee benefit plans. A fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2020 pension and postretirement expense
by approximately $65 million, and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2020 pension and postretirement
expense by approximately $58 million. Similarly, a fifty-basis-point decrease (increase) in the expected return on plan assets would
increase (decrease) our 2020 pension expense by approximately $36 million.
Income Taxes - Income tax provisions for jurisdictions outside the United States, as well as state and local income tax provisions, aredetermined on a separate company basis, and the related assets and liabilities are recorded in our consolidated balance sheets.
The extent of our operations involves dealing with uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitudeof jurisdictions. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions
and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state, and international tax audits. In accordance with the authoritative guidance forincome taxes, we evaluate potential tax exposures and record tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our estimate ofwhether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances;
however, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different
from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. If our estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, an additionalcharge to expense would result. If payment of these amounts ultimately proves to be less than the recorded amounts, the reversal of theliabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when we determine the liabilities are no longer necessary.
We are required to assess the likelihood of recovering deferred tax assets against future sources of taxable income. If we determine,using all available evidence, that we do not reach the more likely than not threshold for recovery, a valuation allowance is recorded.
Significant judgment is required in determining the need for and amount of valuation allowances for deferred tax assets including estimatesof future taxable income in the applicable jurisdictions and the feasibility of on-going tax planning strategies, as applicable.
The effective tax rates used for interim reporting are based on our full-year geographic earnings mix projections. Changes in currency
exchange rates or earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction could have an impact on the effective tax rates. Significant judgment is requiredin determining income tax provisions and in evaluating tax positions.
For further details, see Item 8, Note 11. Income Taxes to our consolidated financial statements.
20

Hedging - As discussed below in “Market Risk,” we use derivative financial instruments principally to reduce exposures to market risks
resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates by creating offsetting exposures. For derivatives to which wehave elected to apply hedge accounting, gains and losses on these derivatives are initially deferred in accumulated other comprehensive
losses on the consolidated balance sheet and recognized in the consolidated statement of earnings into the same line item as the impactof the underlying transaction and in the periods when the related hedged transactions are also recognized in operating results. If we hadelected not to use the hedge accounting provisions, gains (losses) deferred in stockholders’ (deficit) equity would have been recorded in
our net earnings for these derivatives.
Fair value of non-marketable equity securities - For further details, see Item 8, Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH.
Contingencies - As discussed in Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements, legal proceedings covering awide range of matters are pending or threatened against us, and/or our subsidiaries, and/or our indemnitees in various jurisdictions. We
and our subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable
outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The variability in pleadings in multiple jurisdictions, together
with the actual experience of management in litigating claims, demonstrate that the monetary relief that may be specified in a lawsuitbears little relevance to the ultimate outcome. Much of the tobacco-related litigation is in its early stages, and litigation is subject touncertainty. At the present time, except as stated otherwise in Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies, while it is reasonably possible that an
unfavorable outcome in a case may occur, after assessing the information available to it: (i) management has not concluded that it isprobable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases; (ii) management is unable to estimate the possible
loss or range of loss for any of the pending tobacco-related cases; and (iii) accordingly, no estimated loss has been accrued in the
consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes in these cases, if any. Legal defense costs are expensed as incurred.

Consolidated Operating Results
Our net revenues and operating income by segment were as follows:2019(in millions)

Net Revenues
European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada
Net revenues

$

$

2018

2017

9,817 $
3,282
4,042
5,094
5,364
2,206
29,805 $9,298 $
2,921
4,114
4,656
5,580
3,056
29,625 $

8,318
2,711
3,988
4,417
6,373
2,941
28,7483,970 $
547
1,684
2,163
1,932
235
10,531 $

4,105 $
902
1,627
1,747
1,851
1,145
11,377 $

3,691
887
1,884
1,514
2,608
997
11,581

Operating Income$

European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada
Operating income$

Items affecting the comparability of results from operations were as follows:•

Russia excise and VAT audit charge - See Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies for details of the $374 million pre-tax charge includedin the Eastern Europe segment for the year ended December 31, 2019.

•

Asset impairment and exit costs - See Item 8, Note 21. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs for details of the $422 million pre-tax
charge for the year ended December 31, 2019, as well as a breakdown of these costs by segment.

•

Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense - See Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies and Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH for detailsof the $194 million pre-tax charge included in the Latin America & Canada segment for the year ended December 31, 2019.
21

•

Loss on deconsolidation of RBH - See Item 8, Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the $239 million loss included in
the Latin America & Canada segment for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Our net revenues by product category were as follows:
PMI Net Revenues by Product Category(in millions)

2019

2018

2017

Combustible Products$

European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada
Total Combustible Products$

8,093 $
2,438
3,721
5,094
2,693
2,179
24,218 $8,433 $
2,597
3,732
4,656
3,074
3,037
25,529 $

8,048
2,657
3,893
4,417
3,156
2,937
25,107

865 $
324
382
—
2,506
19
4,096 $

269
55
94
—
3,218
4
3,640

29,625 $28,748Reduced-Risk Products
European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada
Total Reduced-Risk Products$$

1,724 $
844
321
—
2,671
27
5,587 $

Total PMI Net Revenues$

29,805 $Note: Sum of product categories or Regions might not foot to total PMI due to rounding.

Net revenues related to combustible products refer to the operating revenues generated from the sale of these products, including shippingand handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. These net revenue amounts consist of
the sale of our cigarettes and other tobacco products combined. Other tobacco products primarily include roll-your-own and make-yourown cigarettes, pipe tobacco, cigars and cigarillos and do not include reduced-risk products.
Net revenues related to reduced-risk products refer to the operating revenues generated from the sale of these products, including shippingand handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. These net revenue amounts consist of
the sale of our heated tobacco units, IQOS devices and related accessories, and other nicotine-containing products, which primarily include
our e-vapor products.
We recognize revenue when control is transferred to the customer, typically either upon shipment or delivery of goods.
Revenues from shipments of Platform 1 devices, heated tobacco units and accessories to Altria Group, Inc., commencing in the third
quarter of 2019, for sale under license in the United States, are included in Net Revenues of the Latin America & Canada segment.
References to "Cost/Other" in the Consolidated Financial Summary table of total PMI and the six operating segments throughout this"Discussion and Analysis" reflects the currency-neutral variances of: cost of sales (excluding the volume/mix cost component); marketing,administration and research costs (including asset impairment and exit costs, the Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense, the charge
related to the deconsolidation of RBH in Canada, and the Russia excise and VAT audit charge); and amortization of intangibles. “Cost/
Other” also includes the currency-neutral net revenue variance, unrelated to volume/mix and price components, attributable to fees forcertain distribution rights billed to customers in certain markets in the ME&A Region, as well as the impact of the deconsolidation in
RBH.

22

Our shipment volume by segment for cigarettes and heated tobacco units was as follows:
PMI Shipment Volume (Million Units)
2019

2018

2017

Cigarettes
174,319
100,644
134,568
174,934
49,951
72,293
706,709

179,622
108,718
136,605
178,469
56,16380,738740,315

187,293
119,398
136,759
171,600
62,65384,223761,926

European Union

12,569

5,977

1,889

Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada (1)Total Heated Tobacco Units

13,4532,654—
30,677299
59,652

4,979
3,403
—
26,866
147
41,372674
907—
32,72927
36,226

186,888
114,097
137,222
174,934
80,62872,592
766,361

185,599
113,697
140,008
178,469
83,02980,885
781,687

189,182
120,072
137,666
171,600
95,382
84,250798,152

European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada
Total Cigarettes
Heated Tobacco Units

Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Units
European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada
Total Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Units(1)

Includes shipments to Altria Group, Inc., commencing in the third quarter of 2019, for sale in the United States under license.

Following the deconsolidation of our Canadian subsidiary, we will continue to report the volume of brands sold by RBH for which other
PMI subsidiaries are the trademark owners. These include HEETS, Next, Philip Morris and Rooftop, which together accounted forapproximately 40% of RBH's total shipment volume in 2018.
Heated tobacco units ("HTU") is the term we use to refer to heated tobacco consumables, which for us include our HEETS, HEETS
Marlboro and HEETS FROM MARLBORO, defined collectively as HEETS, as well as Marlboro HeatSticks and Parliament HeatSticks.
Shipment volume of heated tobacco units to the United States is included in the heated tobacco unit shipment volume of the Latin America& Canada segment.
References to total international market, defined as worldwide cigarette and heated tobacco unit volume excluding the United States,
total industry, total market and market shares throughout this "Discussion and Analysis" are our estimates for tax-paid products based on
the latest available data from a number of internal and external sources and may, in defined instances, exclude the People's Republic ofChina and/or our duty free business. In addition, to reflect the deconsolidation of RBH, effective March 22, 2019, PMI's total market
share has been restated for previous periods.
In-market sales ("IMS") is defined as sales to the retail channel, depending on the market and distribution model.
23

North Africa is defined as Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia.
The Gulf Cooperation Council ("GCC") is defined as Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Unless otherwise stated, references to total industry, total market, our shipment volume and our market share performance reflect cigarettes
and heated tobacco units.
From time to time, PMI’s shipment volumes are subject to the impact of distributor inventory movements, and estimated total industry/market volumes are subject to the impact of inventory movements in various trade channels that include estimated trade inventory
movements of PMI’s competitors arising from market-specific factors that significantly distort reported volume disclosures. Such factors
may include changes to the manufacturing supply chain, shipment methods, consumer demand, timing of excise tax increases or otherinfluences that may affect the timing of sales to customers. In such instances, in addition to reviewing PMI shipment volumes and certain
estimated total industry/market volumes on a reported basis, management reviews these measures on an adjusted basis that excludes theimpact of distributor and/or estimated trade inventory movements. Management also believes that disclosing PMI shipment volumes
and estimated total industry/market volumes in such circumstances on a basis that excludes the impact of distributor and/or estimatedtrade inventory movements improves the comparability of performance and trends for these measures over different reporting periods.
2019 compared with 2018
The following discussion compares our consolidated operating results for the year ended December 31, 2019, with the year ended
December 31, 2018.
Estimated international industry cigarette and heated tobacco unit volume, excluding China and the United States, of 2.7 trillion, decreasedby 2.0%, due to the EU, EE, S&SA, EA&A and LA&C, as described in the Regional sections below.
Our total shipment volume decreased by 2.0%, due to:•

Middle East & Africa, primarily reflecting lower cigarette shipment volume, notably in Turkey, partly offset by Egypt and Saudi
Arabia, and lower heated tobacco unit shipment volume in PMI Duty Free;•

South & Southeast Asia, reflecting lower cigarette shipment volume, primarily in Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines, partly
offset by Thailand;•

East Asia & Australia, primarily reflecting lower cigarette shipment volume in Japan and lower cigarette and heated tobacco unit
shipment volume in Korea, partly offset by higher heated tobacco unit shipment volume in Japan; and•Latin America & Canada, reflecting lower cigarette shipment volume, principally in Argentina, Canada (primarily due to the impactof the deconsolidation of RBH) and Venezuela. Excluding the volume impact from the RBH deconsolidation of approximately 4.3
billion units (reflecting the volume of RBH-owned brands from March 22, 2018 through December 31, 2018), our total shipment
volume in the Region decreased by 5.2%;

partly offset by•

the EU, reflecting higher heated tobacco unit shipment volume across the Region, notably in Italy, partly offset by lower cigarette
shipment volume, primarily in France, Germany and Italy; and•Eastern Europe, reflecting higher heated tobacco unit shipment volume across the Region, notably in Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine,
partly offset by lower cigarette shipment volume, primarily in Russia and Ukraine.

Excluding the volume impact from the RBH deconsolidation of approximately 4.3 billion units (reflecting the volume of RBH-owned
brands from March 22, 2018 through December 31, 2018 and including Duty-Free sales of these brands in Canada), PMI's total shipment
volume decreased by 1.4%.
Impact of Inventory Movements
Excluding the volume impact from the deconsolidation of RBH, and the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements
of approximately 1.1 billion units, our total in-market sales declined by 1.5%, due to a 3.7% decline of cigarettes, partly offset by a 35.3%
increase in heated tobacco units.

24

The net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements of approximately 1.1 billion units reflected a 2.7 billion favorable
impact from heated tobacco units (driven primarily by Japan, mainly reflecting a favorable comparison with 2018 in which IQOS
consumable inventories were reduced, partly offset by PMI Duty Free), partially offset by a 1.6 billion unfavorable impact from cigarettes(due primarily to Japan, North Africa and Thailand, partly offset by the EU Region and Saudi Arabia).
Our cigarette shipment volume by brand and heated tobacco unit shipment volume was as follows:
PMI Shipment Volume by Brand (Million Units)
2019

Full-Year2018

262,908
92,87357,18549,16438,72335,133

264,423
89,78959,452
49,864
41,69739,52232,43528,025
19,602
12,831
77,830706,70959,652
766,361

29,19532,17323,021
16,596
94,583740,315
41,372
781,687

ChangeCigarettes
Marlboro
L&M
Chesterfield
Philip Morris
Parliament
Sampoerna A
Dji Sam Soe
Bond Street
Lark
FortuneOthersTotal Cigarettes
Heated Tobacco Units (1)Total Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Units(1)(0.6)%
3.4 %(3.8)%(1.4)%(7.1)%(11.1)%
11.1 %(12.9)%(14.9)%(22.7)%(17.7)%(4.5)%
44.2 %(2.0)%

Includes shipments to Altria Group, Inc., commencing in the third quarter of 2019, for sale in the United States under license.

Note: Sampoerna A includes Sampoerna; Philip Morris includes Philip Morris/Dubliss; and Lark includes Lark Harmony.

Our cigarette shipment volume of the following brands decreased:•

Marlboro, mainly due to Italy and Japan, partly reflecting the impact of out-switching to heated tobacco units, as well as France,
partially offset by the Philippines, Saudi Arabia and Turkey;•

Chesterfield, mainly due to Argentina, Italy, Russia and Venezuela, partly offset by Brazil;•

Philip Morris, notably due to Argentina, partly offset by Indonesia and Russia;•

Parliament, mainly due to Japan, Korea and Russia;•

Sampoerna A in Indonesia, mainly reflecting the impact of retail price increases resulting in widened price gaps with competitors'
products;•

Bond Street, mainly due to Russia and Ukraine;•

Lark, mainly due to Japan and Turkey;•

Fortune in the Philippines, mainly reflecting up-trading to Marlboro resulting from narrowed price gaps with the below premium
price segment; and•"Others," notably due to: the impact of the deconsolidation of RBH in Canada; mid-price Sampoerna U in Indonesia, partly reflecting
the impact of above-inflation retail price increases; and low-price brands, notably Morven in Pakistan and Next/Dubliss in Russia,
partly offset by Jackpot in the Philippines.

The increase in our heated tobacco unit shipment volume was mainly driven by: the EU (notably Italy and Poland), Eastern Europe(notably Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine) and Japan, partly offset by Korea and PMI Duty Free.

25

Our cigarette shipment volume of the following brands increased:•

L&M, mainly driven by Egypt and Thailand, partly offset by Russia and Turkey; and•Dji Sam Soe in Indonesia, driven by the strong performance of the DSS Magnum Mild 16 variant and the introduction of 20s and
50s variants.

2019 International Share of Market (excluding China and the United States)
Our total international market share (excluding China and the United States), defined as our cigarette and heated tobacco unit sales volume
as a percentage of total industry cigarette and heated tobacco unit sales volume, increased by 0.1 point to 28.4%, reflecting:•Total international heated tobacco unit market share of 2.2%, up by 0.6 points; and•Total international cigarette market share of 26.2%, down by 0.5 points.

Our total international cigarette market share, defined as our cigarette sales volume as a percentage of total industry cigarette sales volume,
was down by 0.3 points to 26.9%, mainly reflecting: out-switching to heated tobacco units, notably in the EU and Japan; and lower
cigarette market share, notably in Argentina, Indonesia, Korea and Turkey.
In 2019, we owned six of the world's top 15 international cigarette brands, with international cigarette market shares as follows: Marlboro,
10.0%; L&M, 3.5%; Chesterfield, 2.2%; Philip Morris, 1.9%; Parliament, 1.5%; and Bond Street, 1.1%.

26

Key Market Data
Key market data regarding total market size, our shipments and market share were as follows:

MarketTotal

Total Market(billion units)
2019
2018

PMI Shipments (billion units)
HeatedTotal
Cigarette
Tobacco Unit2019 20182019 20182019 2018

PMI Market Share (%)(1)
HeatedTotal
Tobacco Unit
2019
2018
2019 2018

2,703.6 2,757.7

766.4 781.7

706.7 740.3

59.7

41.4

28.4

28.3

2.2

1.6

37.9
73.3
67.9
46.2
45.3

40.9
75.2
69.0
43.2
45.0

17.0
27.9
34.9
19.0
14.5

18.5
28.1
35.2
17.9
14.1

16.9
27.0
31.4
17.9
14.1

18.4
27.7
33.5
17.6
13.9

0.1
0.9
3.5
1.1
0.3

—
0.4
1.7
0.4
0.2

45.0
38.0
51.8
41.2
31.3

45.5
37.3
51.8
41.5
32.1

0.2
1.2
4.8
2.5
0.7

0.1
0.5
2.2
0.9
0.4

226.5

238.9

68.0

68.0

58.8

64.6

9.2

3.4

30.1

28.3

3.8

1.0

20.8
118.9

20.6
118.5

9.2
51.9

7.4
55.0

9.2
51.9

7.4
55.0

—
—

—
—

43.0
43.7

41.5
46.4

—
—

—
—

306.8
70.5

303.6
73.2

98.5
49.7

101.4
51.2

98.5
49.7

101.4
51.2

—
—

—
—

32.1
70.5

33.4
69.9

—
—

—
—

12.0
158.0
68.6

12.8
167.3
69.5

3.3
52.4
15.5

3.8
52.3
17.4

3.3
26.6
10.8

3.8
30.8
12.0

—
25.8
4.6

—
21.4
5.4

27.5
34.5
22.6

29.7
34.0
25.0

—
17.1
6.8

—
15.5
7.8

33.4
35.5

35.0
35.5

23.3
23.8

25.8
24.2

23.3
23.8

25.8
24.2

—
—

—
—

70.0
67.1

73.8
68.0

—
—

—
—

European Union
FranceGermany
Italy
PolandSpain
Eastern Europe
RussiaMiddle East & Africa
Saudi Arabia
TurkeySouth & Southeast Asia
Indonesia
Philippines
East Asia & Australia
Australia
Japan
Korea
Latin America & Canada
Argentina
Mexico(1) Market share estimates are calculated using IMS data
Note: % change for Total Market and PMI shipments is computed based on millions of units; PMI Market Share estimates for previous periods arerestated to reflect RBH deconsolidation and exclude RBH-owned brands.

27

Financial Summary Years Ended
December 31,(in millions)

Financial Summary
ChangeFav./(Unfav.)
2019

2018

Total

Excl.
Curr.

Variance
Fav./(Unfav.)
Total

Currency

Price

Vol/
Mix

Cost/
Other(1)

Net Revenues$ 29,805 $ 29,625

0.6 %

3.8 % $ 180 $ (937) $ 1,483 $ 397 $Cost of Sales(10,513) (10,758)

2.3 %(0.5)%

245

302

—

(309)

252

Marketing, Administration and Research
Costs (2)(8,695)(7,408)(17.4)% (22.0)%(1,287)340——(1,627)

(66)

(82)

19.5 % 15.9 %

16

3

—

—

13

Amortization of Intangibles
Operating Income(1)$ 10,531 $ 11,377(7.4)%(4.9)% $ (846) $ (292) $ 1,483 $(763)

88 $ (2,125)

Cost/Other variance includes the impact of the RBH deconsolidation.

(2)

Unfavorable Cost/Other variance includes asset impairment and exit costs of $422 million in 2019, the Russia excise and VAT audit charge of $374
million in 2019, the 2019 loss on deconsolidation of RBH of $239 million, and the 2019 Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense of $194 million,
as well as the impact of the RBH deconsolidation.
Note: Net Revenues include revenues from shipments of Platform 1 devices, heated tobacco units and accessories to Altria Group, Inc., commencing in
the third quarter of 2019, for sale under license in the United States.

Net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 3.8%, mainly reflecting: a favorable pricing variance, notably in Germany,
Indonesia, Japan, the Philippines and Turkey; and favorable volume/mix, mainly driven by heated tobacco unit and IQOS device volume
in the EU and Russia, and heated tobacco unit volume in Japan, partly offset by unfavorable volume/mix of cigarettes, notably in Australia,
the EU, Indonesia, Japan and Russia, unfavorable heated tobacco unit volume in PMI Duty Free, and unfavorable IQOS device volume
in Japan and Korea. The currency-neutral growth in net revenues of 3.8% came despite the unfavorable impact of $763 million, shownin "Cost/Other," predominantly resulting from the deconsolidation of RBH.
The unfavorable currency in net revenues was due primarily to the Euro, Russian ruble and Turkish lira.
Net revenues include $5.6 billion in 2019 and $4.1 billion in 2018 related to the sale of RRPs. In 2019, approximately $0.7 billion of
our $5.6 billion in RRP net revenues were from IQOS devices.
Operating income decreased by 7.4%. Excluding unfavorable currency ($292 million), asset impairment and exit costs ($422 million)
in 2019 related to plant closures in Argentina, Colombia, Germany and Pakistan as part of global manufacturing infrastructure optimization,
the 2019 Russia excise and VAT audit charge ($374 million), the 2019 loss on deconsolidation of RBH ($239 million) and the 2019
Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense ($194 million), operating income increased by 5.9%, primarily reflecting: a favorable pricing
variance; favorable volume/mix, mainly driven by heated tobacco units in the EU, Japan and Russia, partly offset by unfavorable volume/
mix of cigarettes, notably in Australia, the EU, Indonesia, Japan and Russia, as well as unfavorable heated tobacco unit volume in PMI
Duty Free; and lower manufacturing costs; partly offset by higher marketing, administration and research costs, reflecting increased
investment behind reduced-risk products (mainly in the EU and Eastern Europe), and the net unfavorable impact resulting from thedeconsolidation of RBH shown in "Cost/Other."Interest expense, net, of $570 million decreased by $95 million (14.3%), due primarily to our ongoing efforts to optimize our capital
structure following the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This included the decision to use existing cash to repay $2.5 billion and$4.0 billion of long-term debt that matured in 2018 and 2019, respectively.
Our effective tax rate increased by 0.3 percentage points to 23.2%. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2019, wasunfavorably impacted by changes in earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction and U.S. state deferred income tax expense, partially offset by
the reversal of a deferred tax liability on the unremitted earnings of our Canadian subsidiary, RBH ($49 million), a reduction in estimated
U.S. federal income tax on dividend repatriation for the years 2015-2018 ($67 million), and other repatriation cost differences. We
estimate that our 2020 effective tax rate will be approximately 23%, excluding discrete tax events. Changes in currency exchange rates,
earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction, or dividend repatriation costs may have an impact on the effective tax rates, which we monitor eachquarter. Significant judgment is required in determining income tax provisions and in evaluating tax positions. For further details, see
Item 8, Note 11. Income Taxes.
28

We are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world, and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions. It
is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close, which could result in a change in unrecognizedtax benefits along with related interest and penalties. An estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time.
Net earnings attributable to PMI of $7.2 billion decreased by $726 million or 9.2%. This decrease was due primarily to lower operating
income as discussed above, partially offset by a lower interest expense, net. Diluted and basic EPS of $4.61 decreased by 9.3%. Excluding
an unfavorable currency impact of $0.13, diluted EPS decreased by 6.7%.
2018 compared with 2017
For a discussion comparing our consolidated operating results for the year ended December 31, 2018, with the year ended December 31,
2017, refer to Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation - Discussion andAnalysis - Consolidated Operating Results in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, which was filedwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2019.

Operating Results by Business Segment
Business Environment
Taxes, Legislation, Regulation and Other Matters Regarding the Manufacture, Marketing, Sale and Use of Tobacco Products
The tobacco industry and our company face a number of challenges that may adversely affect our business, volume, results of operations,cash flows and financial position. These challenges, which are discussed below and in “Cautionary Factors That May Affect Future
Results,” include:
•

•
•
•
•
•

regulatory restrictions on our products, including restrictions on the packaging, marketing, and sale of tobacco or other nicotinecontaining products that could reduce our competitiveness, eliminate our ability to communicate with adult consumers, or evenban certain of our products;
fiscal challenges, such as excessive excise tax increases and discriminatory tax structures;
illicit trade in cigarettes and other tobacco products, including counterfeit, contraband and so-called “illicit whites”;
intense competition, including from non-tax paid volume by certain local manufacturers;
pending and threatened litigation as discussed in Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies; andgovernmental investigations.

Regulatory Restrictions: The tobacco industry operates in a highly regulated environment. The well-known risks of smoking have led
regulators to impose significant restrictions and high excise taxes on cigarettes.
We support a comprehensive regulatory framework for tobacco products based on the principle of harm reduction, including mandated
health warnings, minimum age laws, restrictions on advertising, and public place smoking restrictions. We also support regulatory
measures that help reduce illicit trade.
Much of the regulation that shapes the business environment in which we operate is driven by the World Health Organization's (“WHO”)
Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (“FCTC”), which entered into force in 2005. The FCTC has as its main objective to establish
a global agenda for tobacco regulation, with the purpose of reducing tobacco use. To date, 180 countries and the European Union are
Parties to the FCTC. The treaty requires Parties to have in place various tobacco control measures and recommends others. The FCTC
governing body, the Conference of the Parties (“CoP”), has also adopted non-binding guidelines and policy recommendations related tocertain articles of the FCTC that go beyond the text of the treaty. In October 2018, the CoP recognized the need for more scientificassessment and improved reporting to define policy on heated tobacco products. Similar to its previous policy recommendations on ecigarettes, the CoP invited countries to regulate, restrict or prohibit heated tobacco products, as appropriate under their national laws.
In July 2019, the WHO issued the Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic 2019. While citing insufficient independent studies regarding
the benefits and the unknown long-term health impacts of electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products, the WHO
has taken the position that such products are not risk-free and should be regulated in the same manner as cigarettes and in line with the
FCTC provisions.
29

It is not possible to predict whether or to what extent measures recommended by the WHO, including the FCTC guidelines, will be
implemented.
We agree that all tobacco and nicotine-containing products, including our RRPs, need to be regulated; however, we continue to seek toengage in a dialogue with regulators with respect to those measures that we do not believe would protect public health and, if implemented,
could disrupt competition, severely limit our ability to market and sell our products (including our RRPs) to adult smokers, or increase
illicit trade. We advocate for measures that would accelerate switching to better alternatives to continued smoking and embrace aregulatory framework that recognizes a risk continuum of tobacco and other nicotine-containing products.
Certain measures are discussed in more detail below and in the Reduced-Risk Products (RRPs) section.
Fiscal Challenges: Excessive and disruptive excise, sales and other tax increases and discriminatory tax structures are expected to continue
to have an adverse impact on our profitability, due to lower consumption and consumer down-trading to non-premium, discount, otherlow-price or low-taxed combustible tobacco products such as fine cut tobacco and illicit cigarettes. In addition, in certain jurisdictions,some of our combustible products are subject to tax structures that discriminate against premium-price products and manufactured
cigarettes. We believe that such tax policies undermine public health by encouraging consumers to turn to illicit trade, and ultimately
undercut government revenue objectives, disrupt the competitive environment, and encourage criminal activity. Other jurisdictions have
imposed, or are seeking to impose, levies or other taxes specifically on tobacco companies, such as taxes on revenues and/or profits.
EU Tobacco Products Directive: In April 2014, the EU adopted a significantly revised EU Tobacco Products Directive (TPD), which
entered into force in May 2016. All Member States have adopted laws transposing the TPD. The TPD sets forth a comprehensive set of
regulatory requirements for tobacco products, including:••••health warnings covering 65% of the front and back panels of cigarette packs, with an option for Member States to further
standardize tobacco packaging, including the introduction of plain packaging;a ban on characterizing flavors in some tobacco products, with a transition period for menthol expiring in May 2020;
security features and tracking and tracing measures that became effective on May 20, 2019; anda framework for the regulation of novel tobacco products and e-cigarettes, including requirements for health warnings andinformation leaflets, a prohibition on product packaging text related to reduced risk, and the introduction of notification
requirements or authorization procedures in advance of commercialization.

Plain Packaging and Other Packaging Restrictions: Plain packaging legislation bans the use of branding, logos and colors on packaging
other than the brand name and variant that may be printed only in specified locations and in a uniform font. To date, plain packaging
laws have been adopted in certain markets in all of our operating segments, including the key markets of Australia, France, Saudi Arabia
and Turkey, and are in various degrees of implementation. Some countries, such as Canada, New Zealand and Israel, adopted plain
packaging regulations that apply to all tobacco products, including RRPs. Other countries are also considering plain packaging legislation.
Some countries have adopted, or are considering adopting, packaging restrictions that could have an impact similar to plain packaging.
Examples of such restrictions include standardizing the shape and size of packages, prohibiting certain colors or the use of certain
descriptive phrases on packaging, and requiring very large graphic health warnings that leave little space for branding.
Restrictions and Bans on the Use of Ingredients: The WHO and others in the public health community have recommended restrictions
or total bans on the use of some or all ingredients in tobacco products, including menthol. Broad restrictions and ingredient bans would
require us to reformulate our American blend tobacco products and could reduce our ability to differentiate these products in the market
in the long term. Menthol bans would eliminate the entire category of mentholated tobacco products. The European Union has banned
flavored tobacco products, subject to an exemption until May 2020 for menthol. Other countries may follow the EU’s approach. For
instance, Turkey has banned menthol as of May 2020. Broader ingredient bans have been adopted by Canada and Brazil. In Brazil, an
ingredient ban is currently on appeal by a tobacco industry union, of which our Brazilian subsidiary is a member. It is not possible topredict the outcome of these legal proceedings.

30

Bans on Display of Tobacco Products at Retail: In a number of our markets, including, but not limited to, Australia and Russia, governments
have banned the display of tobacco products at the point of sale. Other countries are considering similar bans.
Bans and Restrictions on Advertising, Marketing, Promotions and Sponsorships: For many years, the FCTC has called for, and countries
have imposed, partial or total bans on tobacco advertising, marketing, promotions and sponsorships, including bans and restrictions on
advertising on radio and television, in print and on the Internet. The FCTC's non-binding guidelines recommend that governments
prohibit all forms of communication with adult smokers.
Restrictions on Product Design: Some members of the public health community are calling for the further standardization of tobacco
products by requiring, for example, that cigarettes have a certain minimum diameter, which would amount to a ban on slim cigarettes,
or requiring the use of standardized filter and cigarette paper designs. In addition, at its meeting in November 2016, the CoP adopted
non-binding guidelines recommending that countries regulate product design features that increase the attractiveness of tobacco products,
such as the diameter of cigarettes and the use of flavor capsules.
Restrictions on Public Smoking: The pace and scope of public smoking restrictions have increased significantly in most of our markets.
Many countries around the world have adopted, or are likely to adopt, regulations that restrict or ban smoking in public and/or work
places, restaurants, bars and nightclubs. Some public health groups have called for, and some countries, regional governments andmunicipalities have adopted or proposed, bans on smoking in outdoor places, as well as bans on smoking in cars (typically, when minors
are present) and private homes.
Other Regulatory Issues: Some regulators are considering, or in some cases have adopted, regulatory measures designed to reduce thesupply of tobacco products. These include regulations intended to reduce the number of retailers selling tobacco products by, for example,
reducing the overall number of tobacco retail licenses available or banning the sale of tobacco products within specified distances ofcertain public facilities.
In a limited number of markets, most notably Japan, we are dependent on governmental approvals that may limit our pricing flexibility.
The EU Single-Use Plastics Directive, which will require tobacco manufacturers and importers to cover the costs of public collection
systems for tobacco product filters, entered into force on July 2, 2019, after which Member States will have two years to transpose it into
national law. While we cannot predict the impact of this initiative on our business at this time, we are monitoring developments in thisarea.
Illicit Trade: Illicit tobacco trade creates a cheap and unregulated supply of tobacco products, undermines efforts to reduce smoking
prevalence, especially among youth, damages legitimate businesses, stimulates organized crime, increases corruption and reduces
government tax revenue. Excluding China and the U.S., illicit trade may account for as much as 10% of global cigarette consumption;
this includes counterfeit, contraband and the growing problem of “illicit whites,” which are cigarettes legally produced in one jurisdiction
for the sole purpose of being exported and illegally sold in another jurisdiction where they have no legitimate market. We estimate that
illicit trade in the European Union accounted for approximately 10% of total cigarette consumption in 2019.
A number of jurisdictions are considering actions to prevent illicit trade. In November 2012, the FCTC adopted the Protocol to Eliminate
Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products (the “Protocol”), which includes supply chain control measures, such as licensing of manufacturers anddistributors, enforcement in free trade zones, controls on duty free and Internet sales and the implementation of tracking and tracing
technologies. To date, 58 Parties, including the European Union, have ratified it. The Protocol came into force in September 2018.
Parties must now start implementing its measures via national legislation. In October 2018, the first Meeting of the Parties to the Protocol
decided to produce a comprehensive report on good practices for the implementation of tracking and tracing systems and to prepare aconceptual framework for global information sharing to combat illicit tobacco trade. We welcome this decision and expect that otherParties will ratify the Protocol.
We devote substantial resources to help prevent illicit trade in combustible tobacco products and RRPs. For example, we engage withgovernments, our business partners and other stakeholders to implement effective measures to combat illicit trade and, in some instances,pursue legal remedies to protect our intellectual property rights.
The tracking and tracing regulations for cigarettes and roll-your-own products manufactured or destined for the EU became effective on
May 20, 2019. The effective date for other tobacco-containing products, including some of our RRPs such as heated tobacco units, is
May 20, 2024. While we expect that this regulation will increase our operating expenses, we do not expect this increase to be significant.
In 2009, our Colombian subsidiaries entered into an Investment and Cooperation Agreement with the national and regional governmentsof Colombia to promote investment in, and cooperation on, anti-contraband and anti-counterfeit efforts. The agreement provides $200
31

million in funding over a 20-year period to address issues such as combating illegal cigarette trade and increasing the quality and quantityof locally-grown tobacco.
In May 2016, PMI launched PMI IMPACT, a global initiative that supports third-party projects dedicated to fighting illegal trade andrelated crimes such as corruption, organized criminal networks and money laundering. The centerpiece of PMI IMPACT is a council ofexternal independent experts in the fields of law, anti-corruption and law enforcement. The experts are responsible for evaluating andapproving funding proposals for PMI IMPACT grants. PMI has pledged $100 million to fund projects within PMI IMPACT over threefunding rounds.
Reduced-Risk Products (RRPs)
Our Approach to RRPs: We recognize that smoking cigarettes causes serious diseases and that the best way to avoid the harms of smoking
is never to start or to quit. Nevertheless, it is predicted that over the next decade the number of smokers will remain largely unchanged
from the current estimate of 1.1 billion, despite the considerable efforts to discourage smoking.
Cigarettes burn tobacco, which produces smoke. As a result of the combustion process, the smoker inhales various toxic substances. In
contrast, RRPs do not burn tobacco and produce an aerosol that contains significantly lower levels of harmful and potentially harmful
constituents ("HPHCs") than found in cigarette smoke.
For smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke, we believe that RRPs, while not risk-free, offer a much better consumer choice.
Accordingly, our key strategic priorities are: to develop and commercialize products that present less risk of harm to adult smokers who
switch to those products versus continued smoking; and to convince current adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke toswitch to those products.
We recognize that this transformation from cigarettes to RRPs will take time and that the speed of transformation will depend in part
upon factors beyond our control, such as the willingness of governments, regulators and other policy groups to embrace RRPs as a desired
alternative to continued cigarette smoking. We also recognize that our part in this transformation must be funded from our existingcigarette business. For as long as a significant number of adult smokers continues to smoke, it is critical that the industry be led byresponsible and ethical manufacturers. Therefore, during the transformation, we intend to remain a leading international cigarettemanufacturer.
We have a range of RRPs in various stages of development, scientific assessment and commercialization. We conduct rigorous scientificassessments of our RRP platforms to substantiate that they reduce exposure to HPHCs and, ultimately, that these products present, arelikely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to adult smokers who switch to them versus continued smoking. We
draw upon a team of expert scientists and engineers from a broad spectrum of scientific disciplines and our extensive learnings of adultconsumer preferences to develop and assess our RRPs. Our efforts are guided by the following key objectives:
•
•
•

•

to develop RRPs that adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke find to be satisfying alternatives to smoking;for those adult smokers, our goal is to offer RRPs with a scientifically substantiated risk-reduction profile that approaches as
closely as possible that associated with smoking cessation;
to substantiate the reduction of risk for the individual adult smoker and the reduction of harm to the population as a whole, basedon scientific evidence of the highest standard that is made available for scrutiny and review by external independent scientists
and relevant regulatory bodies; andto advocate for the development of science-based regulatory frameworks for the development and commercialization of RRPs,
including the communication of scientifically substantiated information to enable adult smokers to make better consumer choices.

Our RRP Platforms: Our product development is based on the elimination of combustion via tobacco heating and other innovative systems
for aerosol generation, which we believe is the most promising path to providing a better consumer choice for those who would otherwise
continue to smoke. We recognize that no single product will appeal to all adult smokers. Therefore, we are developing a portfolio of
products intended to appeal to a variety of distinct adult consumer preferences.
Four RRP platforms are in various stages of development and commercialization readiness:
Platform 1 uses a precisely controlled heating device incorporating our IQOS HeatControl technology, into which a speciallydesigned and proprietary tobacco unit is inserted and heated to generate an aerosol. We have conducted a series of clinical studies forthis platform, the results of which were included in our submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) described below.
32

The results of the first six-month term of the 6+6 month exposure response study were received at the end of 2017, and the related report
was completed and submitted to the FDA in the second quarter of 2018. The study showed that all eight of the co-primary clinical risk
endpoints moved in the same direction in the group that switched to our Platform 1 product as observed for smoking cessation, withstatistically significant changes in five of the eight endpoints compared with on-going smoking. The results of the second six-month termof the 6+6 month exposure response study were received for analysis in the second quarter of 2018; we are analyzing the results, andexpect to finalize the report later this year. In addition, as set out in our submission to the FDA referenced above, we completed an 18month combined chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study in mice, which was on-going at the time of our FDA submission. We shared
the results with the FDA in August 2018.
Platform 2 uses a pressed carbon heat source which, when ignited, generates a nicotine-containing aerosol by heating tobacco.
The results of our pharmacokinetic study (that measured the nicotine pharmacokinetic profile as well as subjective effects) and of our
five-day reduced exposure study indicate that this platform could be an acceptable substitute for adult smokers who seek an alternative
to cigarettes. The reduced exposure study results showed a substantial reduction in relevant biomarkers of exposure to the measured
HPHCs in those who switched to Platform 2 compared to those who continued to smoke cigarettes over a five-day period. The sustainabilityof this reduction as well as changes in clinical risk markers were assessed in a three-month reduced exposure study. The results of thisstudy were received at the end of 2017, and the related report was finalized in the second quarter of 2018.
Platform 3 provides an aerosol of nicotine salt. We have explored two routes for this platform, one with electronics and one
without, and conducted nicotine pharmacokinetic studies with both versions. The results of the pharmacokinetic study related to theversion without electronics were received, and the related report was finalized in the fourth quarter of 2018. The results indicate thisproduct's potential as an acceptable alternative to continued cigarette smoking in terms of product satisfaction. We are conducting a
product use and adaptation study in adult smokers and expect the results in 2020.
Platform 4 covers e-vapor products, which are battery-powered devices that produce an aerosol by vaporizing a nicotinecontaining liquid solution. Our e-vapor products comprise devices using current generation technology and our new e-vapor meshtechnology that addresses certain challenges presented by some e-vapor products currently on the market. Our IQOS MESH products aredesigned to ensure the consistency and quality of the generated aerosol. We conducted a nicotine pharmacokinetic study in 2017. The
results of this study were received in the second quarter of 2018 for analysis, and the related report was finalized in the fourth quarter of
2018. The results of this study indicate that IQOS MESH products are an effective means of nicotine delivery while being a satisfying
alternative for e-cigarette users. In March 2019, a six-month pre-clinical study in mice evaluating the impact of e-cigarette vapor on therisks of pulmonary and cardiovascular disease compared to cigarette smoke was completed; this study did not pertain to a specific product.
The study demonstrated that e-cigarette vapors induce significantly lower biological responses associated with cardiovascular andpulmonary diseases compared with cigarette smoke. We will also initiate a clinical study to measure selected biomarkers of exposure to
HPHCs and assess changes in clinical risk markers.
After we receive the results of our scientific studies mentioned above, in accordance with standard scientific practices, we intend to sharethe conclusions in scientific forums and to submit them for inclusion in peer-reviewed publications.
The research and development expense for our RRP portfolio accounted for 98%, 92% and 74% of our total research and development
expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The research and development expense for the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, is set forth in Item 8, Note 14. Additional Information to the consolidated financial statements.
Commercialization of RRPs: We are building a new product category and tailor our commercialization strategy to the characteristics ofeach specific market. We focus our commercialization efforts on consumer retail experience, guided consumer trials and customer care,
as well as digital communication programs. In order to accelerate switching to our Platform 1 product, our initial market introductions
typically entail one-on-one consumer engagement and introductory device discounts. These initial commercialization efforts require
substantial investment, which we believe will moderate over time.
In 2014, we introduced our Platform 1 product in pilot city launches in Nagoya, Japan, and in Milan, Italy. Since then, we have continuously
expanded our commercialization activities, and the product is currently available for sale in 52 markets in key cities or nationwide.
We estimate that only a very small percentage of adult smokers who convert to our Platform 1 product switch back to cigarettes.
We have integrated the production of our heated tobacco units into a number of our existing manufacturing facilities, are progressing
with our plans to build manufacturing capacity for our other RRP platforms, and continue to optimize our manufacturing infrastructure.
An adequate supply chain for our RRP portfolio, including the supply of electronic devices, is important to our business. We work withtwo electronics manufacturing service providers for the supply of our Platform 1 and IQOS MESH devices and a small number of other33

providers for other products in our RRP portfolio and related accessories. Although we work closely with these service providers onmonitoring their production capability and financial health, the commercialization of our RRPs could be adversely affected if they areunable to meet their commitments. The production of our RRP portfolio requires various metals, and we believe that there is an adequate
supply of such metals in the world markets to satisfy our current and anticipated production requirements. However, some components
and materials necessary for the production of our RRPs, including those for the electronic devices, are obtained from single or limited
sources, and can be subject to industry-wide shortages and price fluctuations. Our inability to secure an adequate supply of such components
and materials could negatively impact the commercialization of our RRPs.
Our Platform 1 and IQOS MESH devices are subject to standard product warranties generally for a period of 12 months from the date ofpurchase or such other periods as required by law. We discuss product warranties in more detail in Item 8, Note 5. Product Warranty.
The significance of warranty claims is dependent on a number of factors, including device version mix, product failure rates, logistics
and service delivery costs, and warranty policies, and may increase with the number of devices sold.
Product quality may affect consumer acceptance of our RRPs.
Our commercialization efforts for the other RRP platforms are as follows:•

We currently market our e-vapor products in Ireland and the U.K. In July 2018, we pilot-launched IQOS MESH, one of our
Platform 4 products, in London, U.K. In light of the current confusion in the e-vapor category, we have postponed our planned
launch of an improved version of this product until the third quarter of 2020, when we expect to reach the optimal capacity forcommercialization at scale.

•

We completed a small-scale city test of TEEPS, our Platform 2 product, that we had initiated in December 2017 in Santo Domingo,
the Dominican Republic. We are finalizing our improvements to this product and plan to conduct a consumer test by the end of
2020.

•

Depending on the outcome of the use and adaptation study described above as well as consumer research, we plan to conduct
a consumer test of our Platform 3 product by the end of 2020.

RRP Regulation and Taxation: RRPs contain nicotine and are not risk-free. We therefore support science-based regulation and taxationof RRPs. Regulation and taxation should differentiate between cigarettes and products that present, are likely to present, or have thepotential to present less risk of harm to adult smokers who switch to these products versus continued smoking and should recognize acontinuum of risk for tobacco and other nicotine-containing products. Regulation should provide minimum standards for all RRP categories
and specific rules for product assessment methodologies, ingredients, labeling and consumer communication, and should ensure that the
public is informed about the health risks of all combustible and non-combustible tobacco and nicotine-containing products. Regulation,
as well as industry practices, should reflect the fact that youth should not consume nicotine in any form.
Some governments have banned or are seeking to ban or severely restrict emerging tobacco and nicotine-containing products such as our
RRPs and communication of truthful and non-misleading information about such products. These regulations might foreclose or
unreasonably restrict adult consumer access even to products that might be shown to be a better consumer choice than continuing tosmoke. We oppose such blanket bans and unreasonable restrictions of products that have the potential to present less risk of harm compared
to continued smoking. By contrast, we support regulation that sets clear standards for all RRP categories and propels innovation to benefit
adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke.
In the United States, an established regulatory framework for assessing “Modified Risk Tobacco Products” and “New Tobacco Products”
exists under the jurisdiction of the FDA. We submitted to the FDA a Modified Risk Tobacco Product Application (“MRTPA”) for our
Platform 1 product in December 2016, and a Premarket Tobacco Product Application (“PMTA”) for our Platform 1 product in March2017.
On April 30, 2019, the FDA determined that a version of our Platform 1 product is appropriate for the protection of public health andauthorized it for sale in the United States. The FDA’s decision followed its comprehensive assessment of our PMTA.
The FDA’s marketing order does not mean that the agency “approved” our Platform 1 product. The authorization is subject to strict
marketing, reporting and other requirements and is not a guarantee that the product will remain authorized, particularly if there is asignificant uptake in youth initiation. The FDA will monitor the marketing of the product.
We plan to file a PMTA application for the IQOS 3 device in the coming months.
34

In May 2017, the FDA formally accepted and filed our MRTPA for substantive scientific review and, in June 2017, the FDA opened theperiod for the public to provide comments on our application. The FDA closed the public comment period on February 11, 2019. In late2019, we provided a response to the FDA's request for clarification regarding our mice study described above. Following our response,
the FDA re-opened a public comment period ending February 24, 2020.
The FDA referred our MRTPA to the Tobacco Product Scientific Advisory Committee (“TPSAC”). TPSAC held a meeting on January
24 and January 25, 2018 to discuss our MRTPA. The recommendations and votes of TPSAC are not binding on the FDA. By regulation,
the FDA’s decision on our MRTPA will take into account, in addition to the views of TPSAC, scientific evidence as well as comments,
data and information submitted by interested persons.
The FDA review of our MRTPA is on-going.
Separately, in July 2017, the FDA issued a policy announcement aiming to explore the potential of nicotine reduction in cigarettes in
conjunction with the availability of less harmful products that deliver nicotine for adults who choose to use such products. In July 2018,as part of a public consultation procedure, we submitted our views on this topic to the FDA. It is not possible to predict the regulatory
measures that may be recommended by the FDA as a result of this policy.
In the U.S., tobacco and nicotine-containing products that were not commercially marketed as of February 15, 2007 are subject to review
and authorization by the FDA. Following a rise in the use of e-vapor products among minors in the U.S. and an outbreak of lung injuries
alleged to be associated with the use of certain e-vapor products in many states, on January 2, 2020, the FDA announced an enforcement
policy against the sale of e-vapor products sold without FDA authorization, prioritizing enforcement against the sale of cartridge-based
e-vapor products with flavors other than tobacco and menthol, and sale of any nicotine-containing products to minors and where the
manufacturer fails to take adequate measures to prevent access by minors.
While we do not sell e-vapor products in the U.S. and therefore are not subject to these actions, we continue to support regulation andindustry practices that reflect the fact that youth should not consume nicotine in any form.
Future FDA actions may influence the regulatory approach of other governments.
Until recently, there were no countries with specific product standards for heat-not-burn products. Effective July 2017 and March 2018,
respectively, Russia and Ukraine adopted standards that set minimum quality and safety requirements for the consumables and defined
methods for demonstrating the absence of combustion, and the product standards in Kazakhstan that came into force in March 2019 also
cover devices. In the UAE, a product standard on minimum quality and safety of electronic nicotine-containing products, including heatnot-burn products, was approved in March 2019. Effective December 2019, Jordan adopted a national standard for heat-not-burn products(both devices and consumables), and defined a method for demonstrating the absence of combustion in these products. We expect andencourage other governments to consider similar product standards going forward.
In the EU, all EU Member States have transposed the EU Tobacco Products Directive, including the provisions on novel tobacco products,
such as heated tobacco units, and e-cigarettes. Most of the EU Member States require a notification submitted six months before theintended placing on the market of a novel tobacco product, while some require pre-market authorizations for the introduction of suchproducts. To date, we have filed a comprehensive dossier summarizing our scientific assessment of our Platform 1 product in over 20
Member States.
In addition, in Italy, in April 2018, we submitted under recent legislation an application for HEETS, used with the IQOS device, requesting
regulatory recognition of the reduction of toxic substances and potential risk reduction resulting from switching to this product compared
to continued cigarette smoking. In January 2019, our application was not granted primarily on the grounds of insufficient data andquestions of methodology. Due to the constraints of the review process, we had been unable to supplement the application with all thedata we subsequently filed with the FDA and to address methodological questions during the review. We plan to submit a new application
where we will clarify the concerns raised by the decision and further strengthen our application by submitting additional evidence that
became available since we submitted our first application, consistent with our FDA filing. We are confident that our evidence supports
our application.
To date, several governmental agencies have published their scientific findings that analyze the harm-reduction potential of certain RRPs
versus continuing smoking, including:In December 2017, at the request of the U.K. Department of Health and Public Health England, the U.K. Committee on Toxicity published
its assessment of the risk of heat-not-burn products relative to cigarette smoking. This assessment included analysis of scientific data
for two heat-not-burn products, one of which was our Platform 1 product. The assessment concluded that, while still harmful to health,35

compared with the known risks from cigarettes, heat-not-burn products are probably less harmful. Subsequently, in February 2018, Public
Health England published a report stating that the available evidence suggests that heat-not-burn products may be considerably lessharmful than cigarettes and more harmful than e-cigarettes.
In May 2018, the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (“BfR”) published a study on the Platform 1 aerosol relative to cigarettesmoke using the Health Canada Intense Smoking Regimen. BfR found reductions in selected HPHCs in a range of 80-99%. Thispublication indicates that significant reductions in the levels of selected toxicants are likely to reduce toxicant exposure, which BfR statedmight be regarded as a discrete benefit compared to combustible cigarettes.
In May 2018, the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment (“RIVM”) published a factsheet on novel tobacco productsthat heat rather than burn tobacco, focusing on our Platform 1 product. RIVM analyzed the aerosol generated by our Platform 1 productand concluded that the use of this product, while still harmful to health, is probably less harmful than continued smoking.
In June 2018, the Korean Food and Drug Administration (“KFDA”) issued a statement on products that heat rather than burn tobacco.
The KFDA tested three heat-not-burn products, one of which was our Platform 1 product. The KFDA confirmed that the levels of thenine HPHCs tested in the aerosol of these products were on average approximately 90% lower compared to those measured in the cigarettesmoke of the top five cigarette brands in South Korea. However, the KFDA stated that it could not establish that the tested heat-not-burnproducts are less harmful than cigarettes. In October 2018, our Korean affiliate filed a request with a local court seeking information
underlying KFDA’s analysis, conclusions and public statements.
In August 2018, the Science & Technology Committee of the U.K. House of Commons published a report of its inquiry into e-cigarettes
and heat-not-burn products. The report concluded that e-cigarettes are significantly less harmful to health than smoking tobacco. The
report also observed that for those smokers who don’t accept e-cigarettes, heat-not-burn products may offer a public health benefit despite
their relative risk. The report called for a risk-proportionate regulatory environment for both e-cigarettes and heat-not-burn products andnoted that e-cigarettes should remain the least taxed, cigarettes the most taxed, with heat-not-burn products falling between the two. The
U.K. Committee on Advertising Practice announced the removal of a prohibition of health claims in the advertising of e-cigarettes in the
U.K. effective November 2018, with a review of the impact of this decision on market practices 12 months thereafter.
In November 2018, the Eurasian Economic Commission (regulatory body of the Eurasian Union consisting of Armenia, Belarus,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia) published the results of its commissioned study on novel nicotine-containing products, including
our Platform 1 product. The study confirms significantly lower levels of HPHCs in the aerosol generated by this product compared tocigarette smoke.
In January 2019, scientific media published the results of the study of the China National Tobacco Quality Supervision and Test Centre(“CNTQST”) comparing the aerosol generated by our Platform 1 product with cigarette smoke. The CNTQST found that the former
contained fewer, and lower levels of, harmful constituents than the latter and concluded that the lower temperature of heating tobacco in
our Platform 1 product contributed to the difference. The CNTQST stated that the reduction in emissions of harmful constituents cannot
be interpreted as equivalent to a proportionate harm/risk reduction for smokers.
We make our scientific findings publicly available for scrutiny and peer review through several channels, including our websites. From
time to time, adult consumers, competitors, members of the scientific community, and others inquire into our scientific methodologies,
challenge our scientific conclusions or request further study of certain aspects of our RRPs and their health effects. We are committed toa robust and open scientific debate but believe that such debate should be based on accurate and reliable scientific information. We seek
to provide accurate and reliable scientific information about our RRPs; nonetheless, we may not be able to prevent third-party disseminationof false, misleading or unsubstantiated information about these products. The dissemination of scientifically unsubstantiated information
or studies with a strong confirmation bias by third parties may cause confusion among adult smokers and affect their decision to switch
to better alternatives to continued smoking, such as our RRPs.
To date, we have been largely successful in demonstrating to regulators that our heated tobacco units are not cigarettes due to the absenceof combustion, and as such they are generally taxed either as a separate category or as other tobacco products, which typically yields
more favorable tax rates than cigarettes. Although we believe that this is sensible from the public health perspective, we cannot guaranteethat regulators will continue this approach.
There can be no assurance that we will succeed in our efforts to replace cigarettes with RRPs or that regulation will allow us to commercialize
RRPs in all markets, to communicate about our RRPs, including making scientifically substantiated risk-reduction claims, or to treat
RRPs differently from cigarettes.

36Legal Challenges to RRPs: We face various administrative and legal challenges related to certain RRP activities, including allegations
concerning product classification, advertising restrictions, corporate communications, product coach activities, scientific substantiation,
product liability, and unfair competition. While we design our programs to comply with relevant regulations, we expect these or similar
challenges to continue as we expand our efforts to commercialize RRPs and to communicate publicly. The outcomes of these matters
may affect our RRP commercialization and public communication activities and performance in one or more countries.
Our RRP Business Development Initiatives: In December 2013, we established a strategic framework with Altria Group, Inc. (“Altria”)
setting out terms on how the parties would collaborate to develop and commercialize e-vapor products and commercialize two of our
RRPs in the U.S. In late 2018, Altria announced that it will participate in the e-vapor category only through another e-vapor company inwhich Altria acquired a minority interest. Regarding heat-not-burn products, as discussed above, the FDA has authorized a version of
our Platform 1 product for sale in the U.S., and we are seeking authorization for our MRTP submission. These efforts are not affectedby Altria's e-vapor announcement. In September 2019, Altria's subsidiary, Philip Morris USA Inc., began commercialization of a versionof our Platform 1 product in the U.S.
In January 2020, we announced an agreement with KT&G, a leading tobacco and nicotine company in South Korea, for thecommercialization of KT&G’s smoke-free products outside of South Korea on an exclusive basis. For more information, see Acquisitions
and Other Business Arrangements below.
Other Developments: In September 2017, we announced our support of the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World. We agreed to contribute$80 million per year over the next 12 years, as specified in the agreement. We made an initial contribution of $4.5 million in 2017, thefirst annual contribution of $80 million in the first quarter of 2018 and the second annual contribution of $80 million in the first quarterof 2019. The Foundation is an independent body and is governed by its independent Board of Directors. The Foundation’s role, as set
out in its corporate charter, includes funding research in the field of tobacco harm reduction, encouraging measures that reduce the harmcaused by smoking, and assessing the effect of reduced cigarette consumption on the industry value chain.
Governmental Investigations
From time to time, we are subject to governmental investigations on a range of matters, including tax, customs, antitrust, advertising,and labor practices. We describe certain matters pending in Thailand, Russia and South Korea in Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies.
In November 2010, a WTO panel issued its decision in a dispute relating to facts that arose from August 2006 between the Philippines
and Thailand concerning a series of Thai customs and tax measures affecting cigarettes imported by PM Thailand into Thailand (see Item
8, Note 18. Contingencies for additional information). The WTO panel decision, which was upheld by the WTO Appellate Body, concluded
that Thailand had no basis to find that PM Thailand's declared customs values and taxes paid were too low, as alleged by the DSI in 2009.
The decision also created obligations for Thailand to revise its laws, regulations, or practices affecting the customs valuation and tax
treatment of future cigarette imports. Thailand agreed in September 2011 to fully comply with the decision by October 2012. The
Philippines asserts that to date Thailand has not fully complied with the WTO panel decision. The Philippines has repeatedly expressed
concerns with ongoing investigations by Thailand of PM Thailand, including those that led to the criminal charges described in Item 8,
Note 18. Contingencies, and has commenced two formal proceedings at the WTO to challenge criminal charges against PM Thailand
arguing that the criminal charges appear to be based on grounds not supported by WTO customs valuation rules and inconsistent withseveral decisions already taken by Thai Customs and other Thai governmental agencies. On November 12, 2018 and July 12, 2019, the
WTO issued its decisions agreeing with the Philippines that the criminal charges against PM Thailand and its former and current employees
in connection with import entries of cigarettes from the Philippines and Indonesia, respectively, described in Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies,
are inconsistent with WTO customs valuation rules. In January 2019 and September 2019, Thailand appealed the WTO's decision related
to the criminal charges in connection with import entries of cigarettes from the Philippines and Indonesia, respectively. It is not possible
to predict any future developments in these proceedings while the WTO Appellate Body is not operational.
U.S. GAAP Treatment of Argentina as a Highly Inflationary Economy
Following the categorization of Argentina by the International Practices Task Force of the Center for Audit Quality as a country with athree-year cumulative inflation rate greater than 100%, the country is considered highly inflationary in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Consequently, we began to account for the operations of our Argentinian affiliates as highly inflationary, and to treat the U.S. dollar as
the functional currency of the affiliates, effective July 1, 2018.

37

Asset Impairment and Exit Costs
We discuss asset impairment and exit costs in Item 8, Note 21. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs to our consolidated financial statements.
As part of our transformation to a smoke-free future, we also seek to optimize our organizational design. In January 2020, we commenced
the first phase of a two-phase restructuring project in Switzerland. This phase may impact approximately 265 existing positions that will
be eliminated or relocated, and we initiated consultation procedures for the impacted employees as required under the law. The second
phase of this restructuring project is expected to commence in the second quarter of 2020.

Acquisitions and Other Business Arrangements
We discuss our acquisitions in Item 8, Note 6. Acquisitions to our consolidated financial statements.
On August 27, 2019, we announced that we were in discussions with Altria Group, Inc. regarding a potential all-stock, no premium
merger of equals, and on September 25, 2019, we announced that the merger discussions had ended and that both companies agreed tofocus on launching our Platform 1 product in the United States.
Global Collaboration Agreement with KT&G
In January 2020, PMI announced a global collaboration agreement with the leading tobacco and nicotine company in South Korea, KT&G,
to commercialize KT&G’s smoke-free products outside of the country. The agreement will run for an initial period of three years. The
two companies plan for global collaboration with the intention to actively expand to cover many markets, based on commercial success.
The agreement allows PMI to distribute current KT&G smoke-free products, and their evolutions, on an exclusive basis, and does not
restrict PMI from distributing its own or third-party products. KT&G’s smoke-free product brand portfolio includes heat-not-burn tobacco
products (e.g., Lil Mini and Lil Plus), hybrid technologies that combine heat-not-burn tobacco and e-vapor technologies (e.g., Lil Hybrid),
and e-vapor products (e.g., Lil Vapor). PMI will be responsible for the commercialization of smoke-free products supplied under theagreement.
Products sold under the agreement will be subject to careful assessment to ensure they meet the regulatory requirements in the markets
where they are launched, as well as our standards of quality and scientific substantiation of their harm reduction potential. PMI
and KT&G will seek any necessary regulatory approvals that may be required on a market-by-market basis. There are no current plans
to commercialize KT&G products in the United States.
Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries and Equity Securities
We discuss our investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities in Item 8, Note 4. Related Parties - Investments in
Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other and Item 8, Note 16. Fair Value Measurements to our consolidated financial
statements.

Trade Policy
We are subject to various trade restrictions imposed by the United States of America and countries in which we do business (“Trade
Sanctions”), including the trade and economic sanctions administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets
Control and the U.S. Department of State. It is our policy to comply fully with these Trade Sanctions.
Tobacco products are agricultural products under U.S. law and are not technological or strategic in nature. From time to time we makesales in countries subject to Trade Sanctions, either where such sanctions do not apply to our business or pursuant to exemptions or
licenses.
A subsidiary sells products to distributors that, in turn, sell those products to duty free customers that supply U.N. peacekeeping forces
around the world, including those in the U.N. peacekeeping mission located in Abyei, a special administrative territory in Sudan. We
do not believe that these sales, which are not subject to Trade Sanctions, and are de minimis in volume and value, present a material risk
to our shareholders, our reputation or the value of our shares. We have no employees, operations or assets in the Sudan.
To our knowledge, none of our commercial arrangements results in the governments of any country identified by the U.S. government38

as a state sponsor of terrorism, nor entities controlled by those governments, receiving cash or acting as intermediaries in violation of
U.S. laws.
We do not sell products in Iran, North Korea and Syria. From time to time, we explore opportunities to sell our products in one or moreof these countries, as permitted by law.
Certain states within the U.S. have enacted legislation permitting or requiring state pension funds to divest or abstain from future
investment in stocks of companies that do business with certain countries that are sanctioned by the U.S. We do not believe such legislation
has had a material effect on the price of our shares.
2019 compared with 2018
The following discussion compares operating results within each of our operating segments for 2019 with 2018.
Unless otherwise stated, references to total industry, total market, our shipment volume and our market share performance reflect cigarettes
and heated tobacco units.
European Union:
ChangeFav./(Unfav.)Financial Summary Years Ended
December 31,(in millions)

2019

2018

Total

Excl.
Curr.

Variance
Fav./(Unfav.)
Total

Currency

Price

Vol/
Mix

Cost/
Other

Net Revenues$ 9,817 $ 9,298

5.6 %

11.6% $

519 $(563) $

288 $

794 $

—

Operating Income$ 3,970 $ 4,105(3.3)%

4.8% $(135) $

(330) $

288 $

587 $

(680)

Net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 11.6%, reflecting a favorable pricing variance, driven principally by Franceand Germany, partly offset by Poland; and favorable volume/mix, primarily driven by heated tobacco unit and IQOS device volume,
notably in the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Italy and Poland, partly offset by lower cigarette volume, notably in France and Italy,
and unfavorable cigarette volume/mix in Germany.
The net revenues of the European Union segment include $1,724 million in 2019 and $865 million in 2018 related to the sale of RRPs.
Operating income decreased by 3.3%. Excluding asset impairment and exit charges of $342 million in 2019 related to the plant closurein Germany and unfavorable currency of $330 million, operating income increased by 13.1% mainly reflecting: a favorable pricing
variance; favorable volume/mix, primarily driven by heated tobacco unit volume, notably in the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Italy
and Poland, partly offset by lower cigarette volume, notably in France and Italy, and unfavorable cigarette volume/mix in Germany;
partially offset by higher manufacturing costs and higher marketing, administration and research costs, notably related to increased
investment behind reduced-risk products.

39

European Union - Total Market, PMI Shipment and Market Share Commentaries
Total market, PMI shipment volume and market share performance are shown in the table below:
European Union Key Data

Full-Year

Total Market (billion units)

2019
482.5

2018
484.5

174,319
12,569186,888

179,622
5,977
185,599

18.0%

18.5%

6.7%
5.8%
2.7%
2.5%
3.1%
38.8%

6.9%
5.9%
2.9%
1.2%
3.1%
38.5%

Change% / pp(0.4)%PMI Shipment Volume (million units)
Cigarettes
Heated Tobacco Units
Total European Union
PMI Market Share
Marlboro
L&M
Chesterfield
Philip Morris
HEETS
OthersTotal European Union(3.0)%+100.0%
0.7 %

(0.5)
(0.2)
(0.1)
(0.2)
1.3
—
0.3

The estimated total market in the EU decreased by 0.4% to 482.5 billion units, notably due to:•France, down by 7.4%, primarily reflecting the impact of significant excise tax-driven price increases and a higher prevalence ofillicit trade;•

Germany, down by 2.5%, primarily reflecting the impact of price increases in 2018 and March 2019; and•Italy, down by 1.5%, primarily reflecting the impact of price increases in 2018 and the first quarter of 2019;

partly offset by•

Poland, up by 6.8%, primarily reflecting a lower prevalence of illicit trade; and•Spain, up by 0.8%, partly reflecting a lower prevalence of illicit trade.

Our total shipment volume increased by 0.7% to 186.9 billion units, reflecting:•higher heated tobacco unit shipment volume across the Region (notably Italy), driven by higher market share;

partly offset by•lower cigarette shipment volume, mainly in France, due to the lower total market and lower cigarette market share, as well as Germany
and Italy, partly reflecting out-switching to heated tobacco units.

Our Regional market share increased by 0.3 points to 38.8%, with gains in the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece and Portugal, partly
offset by declines in France, Poland and Spain.

40Eastern Europe:
ChangeFav./(Unfav.)Financial Summary Years Ended
December 31,(in millions)

2019

2018

Total

Excl.
Curr.

Variance
Fav./(Unfav.)
Total

Currency

Price

Vol/
Mix

Cost/
Other

Net Revenues$ 3,282 $ 2,921

12.4 % 16.1 % $ 361 $ (108) $85 $ 384 $Operating Income$(39.4)% (41.9)% $ (355) $85 $ 109 $ (572)

547 $

902

23 $

—

Net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 16.1%, reflecting a favorable pricing variance, mainly driven by Russia andUkraine, and favorable volume/mix, predominantly driven by heated tobacco unit and IQOS device volume in Russia and Ukraine, andheated tobacco unit volume in Kazakhstan, partly offset by unfavorable cigarette volume/mix in Russia and lower cigarette volume in
Ukraine.
The net revenues of the Eastern Europe segment include $844 million in 2019 and $324 million in 2018 related to the sale of RRPs.
Operating income decreased by 39.4%. Excluding the unfavorable impact of $374 million related to the Russia excise and VAT audit
charge, and favorable currency of $23 million, operating income decreased by 0.4%, due to: higher marketing, administration and researchcosts, notably reflecting increased investments behind reduced-risk products (primarily in Russia in support of geographic expansion);and higher manufacturing costs; partly offset by a favorable pricing variance; and favorable volume/mix, predominantly driven by heated
tobacco unit volume in Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine, partly offset by unfavorable cigarette volume/mix in Russia.
Eastern Europe - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries
The estimated total market in Eastern Europe decreased by 5.4% to 397.4 billion units, notably due to:•

Russia, down by 5.2%, primarily reflecting the impact of price increases, as well as an increase in the prevalence of illicit trade; and•Ukraine, down by 12.0%, primarily reflecting the impact of excise tax-driven price increases, as well as an increase in the prevalenceof illicit trade;

partly offset by•

Kazakhstan, up by 5.7%, partly reflecting a lower prevalence of illicit trade.

Our Regional market share increased by 1.6 points to 28.7%.

PMI Shipment Volume (million units)

Full-Year
2019

2018

ChangeCigarettes

100,644108,718(7.4)%

Heated Tobacco Units

13,453

4,979+100.0%Total Eastern Europe

114,097

113,697

0.4 %PMI's total shipment volume increased by 0.4% to 114.1 billion units, notably reflecting:•

Kazakhstan, up by 11.6%, reflecting the higher total market and a higher market share of heated tobacco units;

partly offset by•

Ukraine, down by 3.0%, reflecting the lower total market, partly offset by a higher market share of heated tobacco units.

41

Middle East & Africa:
ChangeFav./(Unfav.)Financial Summary Years Ended
December 31,(in millions)

2019

2018

Total

Excl.
Curr.

Variance
Fav./(Unfav.)
Total

Currency

Price

Vol/
Mix

Cost/
Other

Net Revenues$ 4,042 $ 4,114(1.8)%

2.2% $(72) $ (162) $ 207 $ (113) $(4)

Operating Income$ 1,684 $ 1,627

3.5 %

6.8% $

57 $(53) $ 207 $ (128) $31

Net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 2.2%, mainly reflecting: a favorable pricing variance, primarily driven by
Egypt, the GCC, PMI Duty Free and Turkey, partly offset by Morocco; partially offset by unfavorable volume/mix, mainly due to heated
tobacco unit and cigarette volume in PMI Duty Free, as well as cigarette volume in Kuwait, partly offset by favorable cigarette volume
in Egypt and favorable cigarette volume/mix in Algeria and Saudi Arabia.
The net revenues of the Middle East & Africa segment include $321 million in 2019 and $382 million in 2018 related to the sale of
RRPs.
Operating income, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 6.8%, mainly reflecting a favorable pricing variance; lower
manufacturing costs; and lower marketing, administration and research costs, notably in the GCC; partly offset by unfavorable volume/
mix, mainly due to the same factors as for net revenues noted above.
Middle East & Africa - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries
The estimated total market in the Middle East & Africa was essentially flat at 592.4 billion units, notably reflecting:•

Algeria, up by 7.0%, partly reflecting the timing of estimated trade inventory movements in 2019 compared to 2018; and•Egypt, up by 1.6%, mainly due to the timing of estimated trade inventory movements in 2019 related to anticipated price increases;

offset by•

Duty Free, down by 1.6%, mainly reflecting lower purchases by travelers to China; and•Morocco, down by 16.0%, primarily reflecting the impact of significant excise tax-driven price increases in 2019.

Our Regional market share decreased by 0.2 points to 23.5%.

PMI Shipment Volume (million units)

Full-Year

Cigarettes
Heated Tobacco Units
Total Middle East & Africa

2019

2018

Change134,568

136,605(1.5 )%

2,654

3,403

(22.0 )%

137,222140,008(2.0)%

Our total shipment volume decreased by 2.0% to 137.2 billion units, notably in:•

PMI Duty Free, down by 7.0%. Excluding the net unfavorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements of 0.4 billion
units, PMI's in-market sales decline was 4.6%, mainly reflecting lower market share and the lower total market; and•Turkey, down by 5.6%, mainly reflecting lower market share, primarily driven by the timing of retail price increases in April 2019
compared to competition;

partly offset by•

Egypt, up by 12.2%, primarily reflecting higher market share, driven by L&M, as well as the higher total market; and42

•Saudi Arabia, up by 24.9%. Excluding the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements of 1.5 billion units,
mainly attributable to the timing of shipments compared to 2018, PMI's in-market sales grew by 4.1%, primarily reflecting higher
market share.

South & Southeast Asia:
ChangeFav./(Unfav.)Financial Summary Years Ended
December 31,(in millions)

2019

2018

Total

Variance
Fav./(Unfav.)

Excl.
Curr.

Total

Currency

Price

Vol/
Mix

Cost/
Other

Net Revenues$ 5,094 $ 4,656

9.4%

9.6% $ 438 $(10) $ 583 $ (135) $—Operating Income$ 2,163 $ 1,747

23.8%

22.8% $ 416 $17 $ 583 $(99) $(85)

Net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 9.6%, reflecting: a favorable pricing variance, principally driven by Indonesia
and the Philippines, partly offset by unfavorable volume/mix, largely due to Indonesia, partly offset by favorable volume in India andThailand, as well as favorable mix in the Philippines.
Operating income increased by 23.8%. Excluding asset impairment and exit costs of $20 million related to a plant closure in Pakistan
in the first quarter of 2019 as part of our global manufacturing infrastructure optimization, and favorable currency of $17 million, operating
income increased by 24.0%, mainly reflecting: a favorable pricing variance and lower manufacturing costs, partly offset by unfavorable
volume/mix, reflecting the same factors as for net revenues noted above, and higher marketing, administration and research costs, partly
due to the Philippines.
South & Southeast Asia - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries
The estimated total market in South & Southeast Asia decreased by 1.2% to 738.1 billion units, notably due to:•Pakistan, down by 14.0%, mainly reflecting the impact of excise tax-driven price increases;•

the Philippines, down by 3.7%, primarily reflecting the impact of price increases in the below premium segment in the fourth quarterof 2018, as well as price increases in the third quarter of 2019; and•Vietnam, down by 5.2%, mainly reflecting the impact of excise tax-driven price increases;

partly offset by•Indonesia, up by 1.1%, reflecting the absence of an excise tax increase in 2019; and•Thailand, up by 5.8%, primarily reflecting on-going recovery from the September 2017 excise tax reform.

Our Regional market share decreased by 0.1 point to 23.7%.

PMI Shipment Volume (million units)

Full-Year

Cigarettes
Heated Tobacco Units
Total South & Southeast Asia

2019

2018

Change174,934

178,469(2.0 )%——— %174,934

178,469(2.0)%

Our total shipment volume decreased by 2.0% to 174.9 billion units, notably due to:•Indonesia, down by 2.9%, mainly reflecting lower market share, primarily due to the widened retail price gap of Sampoerna A tocompetitive brands following its price increase in October 2018, partly offset by the higher total market;•

Pakistan, down by 8.6%, mainly reflecting the lower total market, partly offset by higher market share driven by favorable retailprice gaps with competitors' brands; and43

•

the Philippines, down by 2.9%, mainly reflecting the lower total market, partly offset by higher market share, notably of Marlboro;

partly offset by•

Thailand, up by 18.0%, mainly reflecting higher market share, driven by the continued strong performance of L&M 7.1 and thefavorable impact of distribution expansion in 2018, as well as the higher total market.

East Asia & Australia:
ChangeFav./(Unfav.)Financial Summary Years Ended
December 31,(in millions)

2019

2018

Variance
Fav./(Unfav.)

Total

Excl.
Curr.

Total

Currency

Price

Vol/
Mix

Cost/
Other

Net Revenues$ 5,364 $ 5,580(3.9)%(3.4)% $ (216) $ (26) $ 230 $ (420) $—Operating Income$ 1,932 $ 1,851

4.4 %

2.4 % $

37 $ 230 $ (292) $

106

81 $

Net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, decreased by 3.4%, reflecting: unfavorable volume/mix, mainly due to lower cigarettevolume in Australia, Japan and Korea, lower IQOS device volume in Japan, and lower heated tobacco unit volume and IQOS device
volume in Korea, partly offset by higher heated tobacco unit volume in Japan. The unfavorable volume/mix was partly offset by a favorable
pricing variance, predominantly driven by Australia and Japan.
The net revenues of the East Asia & Australia segment include $2,671 million in 2019 and $2,506 million in 2018 related to the sale of
RRPs.
Operating income, excluding favorable currency, increased by 2.4%, mainly reflecting: a favorable pricing variance and lower
manufacturing costs, primarily related to Japan and Korea, partly offset by unfavorable volume/mix, mainly reflecting the same drivers
as for net revenues noted above, as well as higher marketing, administration and research costs.
East Asia & Australia - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries
The estimated total market in East Asia & Australia, excluding China, decreased by 4.0% to 299.2 billion units, notably due to:••Australia, down by 5.9%, or by 8.9% excluding the impact of estimated trade inventory movements, mainly reflecting the impact
of excise tax-driven retail price increases;
Japan, down by 5.6%, mainly reflecting the impact of the October 1, 2018 excise tax-driven retail price increases, as well as outswitching to the cigarillo category;•

Korea, down by 1.4%, reflecting the secular decline of the cigarette category, partly offset by the growth of the heat-not-burn category;and•Taiwan, down by 1.9%, continuing to reflect the impact of significant excise tax-driven retail price increases in June 2017, as wellas an increase in the prevalence of illicit trade.

Our Regional market share, excluding China, decreased by 0.5 points to 26.9%.

PMI Shipment Volume (million units)

Full-Year
2019

2018

ChangeCigarettes

49,951

56,163(11.1)%

Heated Tobacco Units

30,677

26,86614.2 %

Total East Asia & Australia

80,62883,029(2.9)%

PMI's total shipment volume decreased by 2.9% to 80.6 billion units, notably in:
44

•

Korea, down by 11.1%, principally due to lower cigarette and heated tobacco unit market share, as well as the lower total market;

partly offset by•

Japan, up by 0.3%, reflecting the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements of approximately 2.6 billion
units (comprised of approximately 3.4 billion heated tobacco units, partially offset by approximately 0.8 billion cigarettes), mainly
due to a favorable comparison with 2018 in which IQOS consumable inventories in Japan were reduced. Excluding the impact ofthese inventory movements, PMI's in-market sales declined by 4.2%, primarily reflecting the lower total market, partly offset byhigher heated tobacco unit market share.

Latin America & Canada:
ChangeFav./(Unfav.)Financial Summary Years Ended
December 31,(in millions)

2019

2018

Total

Excl.
Curr.

Variance
Fav./(Unfav.)
Total

Currency

Price

Vol/
Mix

Cost/
Other

(1)

Net Revenues$ 2,206 $ 3,056(27.8)% (25.6)% $ (850) $(68) $

90 $ (113) $ (759)

Operating Income$(79.5)% (80.7)% $ (910) $

14 $

90 $

(1)

235 $ 1,145(89) $ (925)

Unfavorable Cost/Other variance includes the impact of the RBH deconsolidation.

Note: Net Revenues include revenues from shipments of Platform 1 devices, heated tobacco units and accessories to Altria Group, Inc., commencing in
the third quarter of 2019, for sale under license in the United States.

Net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, decreased by 25.6%, predominantly due to: the unfavorable impact shown in "Cost/Other,"resulting from the deconsolidation of RBH; and unfavorable volume/mix, mainly due to lower cigarette volume in Argentina and Canada,
partly offset by a favorable pricing variance, notably in Brazil, Canada, Colombia and Mexico, partially offset by Argentina, mainly due
to the adoption of highly inflationary accounting.
The net revenues of the Latin America & Canada segment include $27 million in 2019 and $19 million in 2018 related to the sale of
RRPs.
Operating income decreased by 79.5%. Excluding the loss on deconsolidation of RBH ($239 million), the Canadian tobacco litigationrelated expense ($194 million), asset impairment and exit costs ($60 million) related to plant closures in Argentina and Colombia as partof our global manufacturing infrastructure optimization, and favorable currency ($14 million), operating income decreased by 37.6%.
This decline was predominantly due to the unfavorable impact, shown in "Cost/Other," resulting from the deconsolidation of RBH; anunfavorable volume/mix, mainly due to lower cigarette volume in Argentina and Canada, partially offset by a favorable pricing variance,
lower manufacturing costs and lower marketing, administration and research costs.
Latin America & Canada - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries
The estimated total market in Latin America & Canada decreased by 4.3% to 194.1 billion units, notably due to:•Argentina, down by 4.6%, primarily due to the impact of cumulative price increases and the impact of the economic downturn as ofthe second half of 2018;•

Canada, down by 7.7%, primarily due to the impact of cumulative price increases, as well as the growing prevalence of e-vapor
products; and•Venezuela, down by 61.6%, mainly reflecting the deterioration of the socioeconomic environment and the impact of inflation-driven
price increases.

Our Regional market share decreased by 0.4 points to 36.9%.

45

PMI Shipment Volume (million units)

Full-Year

Cigarettes
Heated Tobacco Units
Total Latin America & Canada

2019

2018

Change72,29380,738(10.5)%

299

147+100.0%72,59280,885(10.3)%

Our total shipment volume decreased by 10.3% to 72.6 billion units, or by 5.2% excluding the impact of the RBH deconsolidation, notably
due to:•Argentina, down by 9.4%, primarily reflecting the lower total market, as well as lower market share; and•Venezuela, down by 74.8%, primarily reflecting the lower total market.

2018 compared with 2017
For a discussion comparing our consolidated operating results within each of our operating segments for the year ended December 31,
2018, with the year ended December 31, 2017, refer to Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operation - Operating Results by Business Segment in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2018, which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2019.

Financial Review(in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities

For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$

Net cash used in financing activities

46

10,090 $(1,811)(8,061)

9,478 $
(998)
(9,651)

8,912(3,083)(2,769)2019 compared with 2018
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities of $10.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased by $0.6 billion from thecomparable 2018 period. Excluding unfavorable currency movements of $1.0 billion, net cash provided by operating activities increased
by $1.6 billion, due to lower working capital requirements of $1.3 billion and other movements of $0.3 billion. The unfavorable currency
movements represented the impacts on net earnings coupled with the currency impacts on subsidiary working capital movements andthe related inter-company positions from the fluctuations of the U.S. dollar in 2018 and 2019, especially against the Euro, Mexican peso,
Russian ruble and Turkish lira.
The lower working capital requirements were primarily due to higher cash provided by accrued liabilities and other current assets related
to the timing of excise tax-paid inventory movements and excise tax payments, and higher cash provided by accounts payable reflecting
a combination of extended payment terms from vendors in 2019 and higher 2018 payments for IQOS device purchases in the fourth
quarter of 2017, partially offset by more cash used for accounts receivable primarily due to the timing of cash collections.
The other movements of $0.3 billion, excluding currency, was driven by the net impact of the net earnings decline of $0.4 billion adjusted
for the add-back of the non-cash items of $0.7 billion, comprised of $0.3 billion related to the 2019 Canadian tobacco litigation-related
expense and the 2019 loss on deconsolidation of RBH and $0.4 billion related to the 2019 asset impairment and exit costs. While theasset impairment and exit costs were largely non-cash charges in 2019, approximately $0.2 billion of employee separation costs will be
paid by the end of 2021 - see Item 8, Note 21. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs for additional information.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities of $1.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased by $0.8 billion from the comparable
2018 period. This increase in net cash used in investing activities was due principally to the reduction of cash resulting from thedeconsolidation of RBH, partly offset by lower capital expenditures. For further details on deconsolidation of RBH, see Item 8. Note
22. Deconsolidation of RBH.
Our capital expenditures were $0.9 billion in 2019 and $1.4 billion in 2018. The 2019 expenditures were primarily related to our ongoinginvestments in RRPs. We expect total capital expenditures in 2020 of approximately $1.0 billion (including capital expenditures related
to our ongoing investment in RRPs), to be funded by operating cash flows.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities of $8.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, decreased by $1.6 billion from the comparable
2018 period. The decrease in net cash used in financing activities was due primarily to 2019 proceeds from long-term debt issuances($3.8 billion proceeds from our U.S. dollar and Euro debt issuances in 2019) and the purchase of the remaining 49% interest in our Costa
Rican affiliates in 2018, partially offset by higher long-term debt repayments and higher repayments of short-term borrowing. For further
details on the purchase of the remaining 49% interest in our Costa Rican affiliates, see Item 8, Note 6. Acquisitions.
Dividends paid in 2019 and 2018 were $7.2 billion and $6.9 billion, respectively.
2018 compared with 2017
For a discussion comparing our net cash activities (operating, investing and financing) for the year ended December 31, 2018, with theyear ended December 31, 2017, refer to Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperation - Financial Review in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, which was filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2019.
Debt and Liquidity
We define cash and cash equivalents as short-term, highly liquid investments, readily convertible to known amounts of cash that mature
within a maximum of three months and have an insignificant risk of change in value due to interest rate or credit risk changes. As a policy,
we do not hold any investments in structured or equity-linked products. Our cash and cash equivalents are predominantly held in demand
deposits with institutions that have investment-grade long-term credit rating. As part of our cash management strategy and in order to47manage counterparty exposure, we also enter into reverse repurchase agreements. Such agreements are collateralized with government
or corporate securities held by a custodial bank and, at maturity, cash is paid back to PMI, and the collateral is returned to the bank. For
2018, we had an average balance of $0.3 billion, and we had a zero balance at December 31, 2018. For 2019, the activity for such reverse
repurchase agreements was not material.
We utilize long-term and short-term debt financing, including a commercial paper program that is regularly used to finance ongoingliquidity requirements, as part of our overall cash management strategy. Our ability to access the capital and credit markets as well as
overall dynamics of these markets may impact borrowing costs. We expect that the combination of our long-term and short-term debt
financing, the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities, coupled with our operating cash flows, will enable us tomeet our liquidity requirements.
Credit Ratings – The cost and terms of our financing arrangements as well as our access to commercial paper markets may be affectedby applicable credit ratings. At February 6, 2020, our credit ratings and outlook by major credit rating agencies were as follows:
Moody’sStandard & Poor’s
Fitch

Short-term
P-1
A-1
F1

Long-term
A2
AA

Outlook
StableStableStableCredit Facilities – On January 31, 2020, we entered into an agreement to amend and extend the term of our $2.0 billion 364-day revolving
credit facility from February 4, 2020, to February 2, 2021.
At February 6, 2020, our committed credit facilities were as follows:(in billions)
Committed
CreditFacilities

Type$

364-day revolving credit, expiring February 2, 2021

2.0

Multi-year revolving credit, expiring February 28, 2021

2.5

Multi-year revolving credit, expiring October 1, 2022

3.5$

Total facilities

8.0

At February 6, 2020, there were no borrowings under the committed credit facilities, and the entire committed amounts were available
for borrowing.
All banks participating in our committed credit facilities have an investment-grade long-term credit rating from the credit rating agencies.
We continuously monitor the credit quality of our banking group, and at this time we are not aware of any potential non-performing credit
provider.
All but the $2.0 billion 364-day revolving credit facility in the table above require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“consolidated EBITDA”) to consolidated interest expense of not less than 3.5 to 1.0 on arolling four-quarter basis. At December 31, 2019, our ratio calculated in accordance with the agreements was 11.2 to 1.0. These facilities
do not include any credit rating triggers, material adverse change clauses or any provisions that could require us to post collateral. We
expect to continue to meet our covenants. The terms “consolidated EBITDA” and “consolidated interest expense,” both of which include
certain adjustments, are defined in the facility agreements previously filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
We plan to replace our existing $2.5 billion multi-year revolving credit facility, expiring February 28, 2021 with a new $2.0 billion
revolving credit facility expiring February 10, 2025. The new credit facility, which is expected to close on February 10, 2020, will notinclude the consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense ratio covenant discussed above.
In addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above, certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meettheir respective working capital needs. These credit arrangements, which amounted to approximately $2.7 billion at December 31, 2019,48

and $3.3 billion at December 31, 2018, are for the sole use of our subsidiaries. Borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $338
million at December 31, 2019, and $730 million at December 31, 2018.
Commercial Paper Program – We continue to have access to liquidity in the commercial paper market through programs in place in the
U.S. and in Europe having an aggregate issuance capacity of $8.0 billion. At December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, we had nocommercial paper outstanding. The average commercial paper balance outstanding during 2019 and 2018 was $2.3 billion and $3.4
billion, respectively.
Sale of Accounts Receivable – To mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliatedfinancial institutions. These arrangements allow us to sell, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. The tradereceivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets. We sell trade receivables under
two types of arrangements, servicing and nonservicing.
Our operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidatedbalance sheets, which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions. The trade receivables sold that remained
outstanding under these arrangements as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, were $0.9 billion, $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.
The net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
For further details, see Item 8, Note 20. Sale of Accounts Receivable to our consolidated financial statements.
Debt – Our total debt was $31.0 billion at December 31, 2019, and $31.8 billion at December 31, 2018. Our total debt is primarily fixed
rate in nature. For further details, see Item 8, Note 7. Indebtedness. The weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was
2.5% in 2019 and 2018. See Item 8, Note 16. Fair Value Measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of ourdisclosures related to the fair value of debt. The amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our Board of Directors.
On February 14, 2017, we filed a shelf registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, under which we mayfrom time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period. During February 2020, weplan to file a new shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our debt issuances in 2019 were as follows:(in millions)
Type
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes

(a)
(b)
(c)
(c)
(c)

Face Value

Interest
Rate

$900
$750
€500 (approximately $557)€750 (approximately $835)€750 (approximately $835)

2.875%
3.375%
0.125%
0.800%
1.450%

(d)
(d)
(d)

Issuance
May 2019
May 2019
August 2019
August 2019
August 2019

Maturity
May 2024
August 2029
August 2026
August 2031
August 2039

(a)Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually in arrears beginning in November 2019.
Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually in arrears beginning in August 2019.
(c)
Interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in August 2020.
(d)
USD equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance.
(b)

The net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above have been and will be used for general corporate purposes,
including repayment of outstanding commercial paper and refinancing of outstanding 2.000% Notes due 2020, outstanding Floating Rate
Notes due 2020 and outstanding Euro denominated 1.750% Notes due 2020.
The weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.2 years at the end of 2019 and 9.6 years at the end of 2018.
•

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities, other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed
below.
49

Guarantees – At December 31, 2019, we were contingently liable for $0.5 billion of guarantees of our own performance, of which $0.3
billion related to our obligations under indemnity agreements to enable appeals of customs assessments against our distributors, and $0.2
billion were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products. There is no liability in the consolidated financial statements
associated with these guarantees. At December 31, 2019, our third-party guarantees were insignificant.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations – The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2019:
Payments Due(in millions)2020$30,962$4,051$5,779$4,890$16,242

10,124

877

1,534

1,273

6,440

949

222

286

158

283

Inventory and production costs

3,493

2,199

885

409

—

Other

2,180

977

578

213

412

5,673

3,176

1,463

622

412

1,992
$49,700

278$8,604408$9,470661$7,604645$24,022Long-term debt (1)Interest on borrowings
Operating leases

(2)

(3)

Purchase obligations(4)2021-2022 2023-2024

2025 and
Thereafter

Total

:

Other long-term liabilities

(5)

(1)

Amounts represent the expected cash payments at the face value of our long-term debt and finance lease obligations. For further details, see Item 8, Note 7. Indebtedness
to our consolidated financial statements.
Amounts represent the expected cash payments of our interest expense on our long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt. Interest on our fixedrate debt is presented using the stated interest rate. Interest on our variable debt is estimated using the rate in effect at December 31, 2019. Amounts exclude theamortization of debt discounts, the amortization of loan fees and fees for lines of credit that would be included in interest expense in the consolidated statements ofearnings.
(3)
Amounts represent the maturity of PMI"s operating lease liabilities, on an undiscounted basis.
(4)
Purchase obligations for inventory and production costs (such as raw materials, indirect materials and supplies, packaging, co-manufacturing arrangements, storage
and distribution) are commitments for projected needs to be utilized in the normal course of business. Other purchase obligations include commitments for marketing,advertising, capital expenditures, information technology and professional services. Other purchase obligations also include the expected future contributions to theFoundation for a Smoke-Free World. For further details see Business Environment—Other Developments. Arrangements are considered purchase obligations if acontract specifies all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, a pricing structure and approximate timing of the transaction. Amounts
represent the minimum commitments under non-cancelable contracts. Any amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheet as accounts payable and accrued
liabilities are excluded from the table above.
(5)
Other long-term liabilities consist primarily of transition tax (as discussed in Item 8, Note 11. Income Taxes to our consolidated financial statements), postretirement
health care costs, accruals established for employment costs and accruals established for Exit activities (for further details, see Note 21. Asset impairment and Exit
Costs). The following long-term liabilities included on the consolidated balance sheet are excluded from the table above: accrued pension and postemployment costs,
tax contingencies, insurance accruals and other accruals. We are unable to estimate the timing of payments (or contributions in the case of accrued pension costs) for
these items. Currently, we anticipate making pension contributions of approximately $77 million in 2020, based on current tax and benefit laws (as discussed in Item
8, Note 13. Benefit Plans to our consolidated financial statements).
(2)

Equity and Dividends
We discuss our stock awards as of December 31, 2019, in Item 8, Note 9. Stock Plans to our consolidated financial statements.
During 2019, 2018 and 2017, we did not repurchase any shares under a share repurchase program, and we do not presently intend torepurchase shares of our common stock in 2020.
Dividends paid in 2019 were $7.2 billion. During the third quarter of 2019, our Board of Directors approved a 2.6% increase in thequarterly dividend to $1.17 per common share. As a result, the present annualized dividend rate is $4.68 per common share.

50

Market Risk
Counterparty Risk - We predominantly work with financial institutions with strong short- and long-term credit ratings as assignedby Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. These banks are also part of a defined group of relationship banks. Non-investment grade institutions
are only used in certain emerging markets to the extent required by local business needs. We have a conservative approach when it comesto choosing financial counterparties and financial instruments. As such we do not invest or hold investments in any structured or equitylinked products. The majority of our cash and cash equivalents is currently invested in demand deposits maturing within less than 30days.
We continuously monitor and assess the credit worthiness of all our counterparties.
Derivative Financial Instruments - We operate in markets outside of the U.S., with manufacturing and sales facilities in various
locations throughout the world. Consequently, we use certain financial instruments to manage our foreign currency and interest rate
exposure. We use derivative financial instruments principally to reduce our exposure to market risks resulting from fluctuations in foreignexchange and interest rates by creating offsetting exposures. We are not a party to leveraged derivatives and, by policy, do not use
derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
See Item 8, Note 15. Financial Instruments, Item 8, Note 16. Fair Value Measurements and Item 8, Note 19. Balance Sheet Offsetting
to our consolidated financial statements for further details on our derivative financial instruments and the related collateral arrangements.
Value at Risk - We use a value at risk computation to estimate the potential one-day loss in the fair value of our interest-rate-sensitiveand foreign currency price-sensitive derivative financial instruments. This computation includes our debt and foreign currency forwards,
swaps and options. Anticipated transactions, foreign currency trade payables and receivables, and net investments in foreign subsidiaries,
which the foregoing instruments are intended to hedge, were excluded from the computation.
The computation estimates were made assuming normal market conditions, using a 95% confidence interval and a one-day holding
period using a "parametric delta-gamma" approximation technique to determine the observed interrelationships between movements ininterest rates and various currencies and in calculating the risk of the underlying positions in the portfolio. These interrelationships were
determined by observing interest rate and forward currency rate movements primarily over the preceding quarter for determining value
at risk at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and primarily over each of the four preceding quarters for the calculation of average value atrisk amounts during each year.
Fair Value Impact
At
December 31, 2019

AverageHigh

Low

Foreign currency rates

$18

$20

$24

$18

Interest rates

$301

$247

$346

$169

(in millions)At
December 31, 2018

AverageHigh

Low

Foreign currency rates

$19

$20

$23

$19

Interest rates

$142

$132

$152

$96

(in millions)

Instruments sensitive to:Fair Value Impact

Instruments sensitive to:

The value at risk computation is a risk analysis tool designed to statistically estimate the maximum probable daily loss from adverse
movements in interest and foreign currency rates under normal market conditions. The computation does not purport to represent actual
losses in fair value or earnings to be incurred by us, nor does it consider the effect of favorable changes in market rates. We cannot predict
actual future movements in such market rates and do not present these results to be indicative of future movements in market rates or to51

be representative of any actual impact that future changes in market rates may have on our future results of operations or financial
position.
Contingencies
See Item 3 and Item 8, Note 18. Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of contingencies.

Cautionary Factors That May Affect Future Results
Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements
We may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in filings with the SEC, inreports to stockholders and in press releases and investor webcasts. You can identify these forward-looking statements by use of words
such as "strategy," "expects," "continues," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "will," "estimates," "intends," "projects," "goals," "targets"and other words of similar meaning. You can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.
We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized, although we believe we have been prudent in our plans andassumptions. Our RRPs constitute a new product category in its early stages that is less predictable than our mature cigarette business.
Achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or
projected. Investors should bear this in mind as they consider forward-looking statements and whether to invest in or remain invested inour securities. In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we are identifying
important factors that, individually or in the aggregate, could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those containedin any forward-looking statements made by us; any such statement is qualified by reference to the following cautionary statements. We
elaborate on these and other risks we face throughout this document, particularly in Item 1A. Risk Factors and Business Environment of
this section. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all risk factors. Consequently, you should not consider
this discussion of potential risks or uncertainties to be complete. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that wemay make from time to time, except in the normal course of our public disclosure obligations.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The information called for by this Item is included in Item 7, Market Risk.

52

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Consolidated Statements of Earnings(in millions of dollars, except per share data)
2019

for the years ended December 31,$

Revenues including excise taxes

2018

77,921$

2017

79,823$78,098

Excise taxes on products

48,11650,19849,350

Net revenues

29,80529,62528,748

Cost of sales

10,513

10,75810,432

19,292

18,86718,316

8,695

7,408

6,647

66

82

88

Operating income

10,531

11,377

11,581

Interest expense, net (Note 14)

570

665

914

Pension and other employee benefit costs (Note 13)

89

41

78

Earnings before income taxes

9,872

10,671

10,589Provision for income taxes (Note 11)

2,293

2,445

4,307

Equity investments and securities (income)/loss, net

(149)

(60)

(59)

7,728

8,286

6,341

543

375

306

Gross profit
Marketing, administration and research costs (Notes 18, 21 & 22)
Amortization of intangibles

Net earnings
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net earnings attributable to PMI

$

7,185

$

7,911

$

6,035

Basic earnings per share

$

4.61

$

5.08

$

3.88

Diluted earnings per share

$

4.61

$

5.08

$

3.88

Per share data (Note 10):

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
53

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings(in millions of dollars)
2019

for the years ended December 31,$

Net earnings

2018

7,728

$

2017

8,286

$

6,341

Other comprehensive earnings (losses), net of income taxes:
Change in currency translation adjustments:
Unrealized gains (losses), net of income taxes of ($161) in 2019,($47) in 2018 and $620 in 2017

505

(812)

330

(Gains)/losses transferred to earnings, net of income taxes of $0 in
2019, 2018 and 2017

—

—

(2)

(Gains)/losses transferred to earnings - deconsolidation of RBH,
net of income taxes of $0 in 2019, 2018 and 2017 (Note 22)

502

—

—

Net gains (losses) and prior service costs, net of income taxes of$247 in 2019, $65 in 2018 and ($17) in 2017(454)

(1,046)

523

Amortization of net losses, prior service costs and net transition
costs, net of income taxes of ($69) in 2019, ($43) in 2018 and($31) in 2017

243

218

228

(Gains)/losses transferred to earnings - deconsolidation of RBH,
net of income taxes of ($15) in 2019, $0 in 2018 and $0 in 2017
(Note 22)

27

—

—

Gains (losses) recognized, net of income taxes of $2 in 2019, ($4)
in 2018 and $8 in 2017

(18)

24

(44)

(Gains) losses transferred to earnings, net of income taxes of $3 in
2019, $5 in 2018 and $2 in 2017

(14)

(31)

(11)

791

(1,647)

1,024

8,519

6,639

7,365

586

304

306

Change in net loss and prior service cost:

Change in fair value of derivatives accounted for as hedges:

Total other comprehensive earnings (losses)
Total comprehensive earnings
Less comprehensive earnings attributable to:Noncontrolling interests$

Comprehensive earnings attributable to PMI

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
54

7,933

$

6,335

$

7,059

Consolidated Balance Sheets(in millions of dollars, except share data)
at December 31,

2019

2018

AssetsCash and cash equivalents

$

6,861

$

6,593

3,080

2,950

637

614

Leaf tobacco

2,052

2,318

Other raw materials

1,596

1,405

Finished product

5,587
9,235

5,081
8,804

701

481

20,514

19,442566

600

Buildings and building equipment

4,132

3,975

Machinery and equipment

9,354

9,096

Construction in progress

394
14,446886
14,557

Less: accumulated depreciation

7,815
6,631

7,356
7,201

Goodwill (Note 3)

5,858

7,189

Other intangible assets, net (Note 3)

2,113

2,278

Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities (Notes 4 & 16)

4,635

1,269

Deferred income taxes

1,153

977

Other assets

1,971

1,445

Trade receivables (less allowances of $20 in 2019 and $25 in 2018)
Other receivables
Inventories:

Other current assets
Total current assets
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Land and land improvements

Total Assets$

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
55

42,875$39,801

2019

at December 31,

2018

Liabilities$

Short-term borrowings (Note 7)

338

$

730

Current portion of long-term debt (Note 7)

4,051

4,054

Accounts payable

2,299

2,068

666

732

Taxes, except income taxes

5,837

5,088

Employment costs

1,042

794

Dividends payable

1,831

1,783

Other

1,973

1,366

796

576

18,833

17,191Long-term debt (Note 7)

26,656

26,975

Deferred income taxes

908

898

Employment costs

3,634

3,083

Income taxes and other liabilities (Note 11)

2,443

2,393

52,47450,540——Additional paid-in capital

2,019

1,939

Earnings reinvested in the business

30,98731,014

Accumulated other comprehensive losses(9,363)(10,111)

23,643

22,84235,22035,301(11,577)(12,459)

1,978

1,720

(9,599)(10,739)$ 42,875$ 39,801

Accrued liabilities:
Marketing and selling

Income taxes (Note 11)
Total current liabilities

Total liabilities
Contingencies (Note 18)
Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity
Common stock, no par value (2,109,316,331 shares issued in 2019 and 2018)

Less: cost of repurchased stock (553,421,668 and 554,736,610 shares in 2019 and2018, respectively)
Total PMI stockholders’ deficit
Noncontrolling interests
Total stockholders’ deficit
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
56

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows(in millions of dollars)
2019

for the years ended December 31,

2018

2017

CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES$Net earnings

7,728

$

8,286

$

6,341

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to operating cash flows:
Depreciation and amortization

964

989

875

Deferred income tax (benefit) provision

(141)

(100)

(501)

Asset impairment and exit costs, net of cash paid (Note 21)

371

(3)

(10)

Receivables, net

(331)

53

(92)

Inventories

(548)

(613)

730

Accounts payable

451

(51)

425

1,108

910

(554)

Income taxes

75

(135)

1,370

Pension plan contributions

(200)

(110)

(66)

252

394

10,090

9,478

8,912

Capital expenditures(852)(1,436)(1,548)Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities

(31)

(63)

(111)

—

—

Cash effects of changes in:

Accrued liabilities and other current assets

Other

613
Net cash provided by operating activities(1)

CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES(1,346)

Deconsolidation of RBH (Note 22)(2)

Net investment hedges

386

416

(1,527)

Other

32

85

103

(1,811)(998)(3,083)

Net cash used in investing activities

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
57

2019

for the years ended December 31,

2018

2017

CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIESShort-term borrowing activity by original maturity:(364) $

255

Issuances - maturities longer than 90 days

989

—

1,634

Repayments - maturities longer than 90 days

(989)

—

(1,634)Long-term debt proceeds

3,819

—

6,850

Long-term debt repaid(3,998)(2,484)(2,551)Dividends paid

(7,161)(6,885)(6,520)

51

(81)

5

(408)

(456)

(426)

(8,061)(9,651)(2,769)

27

(685)

1,085

(1,856)

$

245
6,620
6,865

$
$

800
2,430

Net issuances (repayments) - maturities of 90 days or less$Sale (purchase) of subsidiary shares to/(from) noncontrolling interests(Note 6)Other
Net cash used in financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(3):Increase (Decrease)
Balance at beginning of year
Balance at end of year

$

(127)

$

8,476
6,620

$

4,145
4,331
8,476

$
$

882
2,749

$
$

1,050
3,403

Cash Paid:
Interest
Income taxes(1)

Includes the Loss on Deconsolidation of RBH ($239 million) and the Canadian tobacco litigation-related charge ($194 million)
that were included in marketing, administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the year ended
December 31, 2019. For further details on these charges, see Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH.

(2)

Includes deconsolidation of RBH cash and cash equivalents of $1,323 million and restricted cash of $23 million.

(3)

The amounts for cash and cash equivalents shown above include restricted cash of $4 million, $27 million and $29 million as ofDecember 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which were included in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
58

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity(in millions of dollars, except per share data)
PMI Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity

Balances, January 1, 2017

CommonStock

Additional
Paid-in
CapitalEarnings
Reinvested
in theBusiness

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Losses

$

$

$

$

—

1,964

Net earnings

30,397

Cost of
Repurchased
Stock(9,559) $Noncontrolling
Interests(35,490) $

6,035

20

1,024
108

Dividends declared ($4.22 per share)

128(6,573)(6,573)(255)

Payments to noncontrolling interests
Other

(12)

Balances, December 31, 2017

—

1,972

29,859Net earnings(8,535)(35,382)

7,911

Other comprehensive earnings(losses), net of income taxes(1,572)Issuance of stock awards

47

(255)

17

5

1,856

(10,230)

375

8,286

(75)

(1,647)

81

Dividends declared ($4.49 per share)

128(6,994)(6,994)(435)

Payments to noncontrolling interests
Adoption of new accounting
standards (1)Other (Note 6)

(435)

238

238
(4)

(80)

Balances, December 31, 2018

—

1,939

31,014Net earnings(10,111)(35,301)

7,185

Other comprehensive earnings(losses), net of income taxes

219

Issuance of stock awards
Dividends declared ($4.62 per share)

79

(1)

(85)

1,720

(10,739)

543

7,728

43

262

81

160

(7,212)(7,212)

Payments to noncontrolling interests(378)

Deconsolidation of RBH (Note 22)

(378)

529

Other

1
$

—

$

2,019

529

—
$

30,987(10,900)
6,341

1,024

Issuance of stock awards

(1)

Total
$

306

Other comprehensive earnings(losses), net of income taxes

Balances, December 31, 2019

1,788

$

(9,363) $50(35,220) $

1,978

51
$

(9,599)Financial Accounting Standard Update ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities”

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
59Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1.
Background and Basis of Presentation:
Background
Philip Morris International Inc. is a holding company incorporated in Virginia, U.S.A., whose subsidiaries and affiliates and their licensees
are engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products, including reduced-risk products, in markets
outside of the United States of America. In addition, PMI ships a version of its Platform 1 device and its consumables authorized by the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") to Altria Group, Inc., for sale in the United States under license. Throughout these financial
statements, the term "PMI" refers to Philip Morris International Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Reduced-risk products ("RRPs") is the term PMI uses to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present
less risk of harm to smokers who switch to these products versus continuing smoking. PMI has a range of RRPs in various stages ofdevelopment, scientific assessment and commercialization.
"Platform 1" is the term PMI uses to refer to PMI’s reduced-risk product that uses a precisely controlled heating device incorporating
our IQOS HeatControl technology, into which a specially designed and proprietary tobacco unit is inserted and heated to generate anaerosol.
Basis of presentation
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America("U.S. GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, thedisclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenues and expenses during
the reporting periods. Significant estimates and assumptions include, among other things: pension and benefit plan assumptions; useful
lives and valuation assumptions of goodwill and other intangible assets; valuation assumptions for non-marketable equity securities;
marketing programs, and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The consolidated financial statements include PMI, as well as its wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. Investments in which
PMI exercises significant influence (generally 20%-50% ownership interest) are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
Investments not accounted for under the equity method of accounting are measured at fair value, if it is readily determinable, with changes
in fair value recognized in net income. Investments without readily determinable fair values, non-marketable equity securities, aremeasured and recorded using a measurement alternative that values the security at cost minus any impairment. All intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated.
As of March 22, 2019, PMI deconsolidated the financial results of its Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH")
from PMI's financial statements. For further details, see Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH.

Note 2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash equivalents include demand deposits with banks and all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

60

Depreciation
Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost and depreciated by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the assets. Machinery and equipment are depreciated over periods ranging from 3 to 15 years, and buildings and building improvements
over periods up to 40 years.
Employee benefit plans
PMI provides a range of benefits to its employees and retired employees, including pensions, postretirement health care andpostemployment benefits (primarily severance). PMI records annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified
under U.S. GAAP. PMI recognizes the funded status of its defined pension and postretirement plans on the consolidated balance sheets.
The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plans assets and the benefit obligation. PMI measures theplan assets and liabilities at the end of the fiscal year. For defined benefit pension plans, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit
obligation. For the postretirement health care plans, the benefit obligation is the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. Anyplan with an overfunded status is recognized as an asset, and any plan with an underfunded status is recognized as a liability. Any gains
or losses and prior service costs or credits that have not been recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs are recorded as acomponent of other comprehensive earnings (losses), net of deferred taxes. PMI elects to recognize actuarial gains/(losses) using thecorridor approach.
Foreign currency translation
PMI translates the results of operations of its subsidiaries and affiliates using average exchange rates during each period, whereas balance
sheet accounts are translated using exchange rates at the end of each period. Currency translation adjustments are recorded as a componentof stockholders’ (deficit) equity. In addition, some of PMI’s subsidiaries have assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other thantheir functional currencies, and to the extent those are not designated as net investment hedges, these assets and liabilities generatetransaction gains and losses when translated into their respective functional currencies.
Goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation
PMI tests goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant
such review. PMI performs its annual impairment analysis in the second quarter of each year. The impairment analysis involves comparing
the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value,
goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired.
Hedging instruments
Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets as either assets or liabilities. Changes in
the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period either in accumulated other comprehensive losses on the consolidated balance sheet
or in earnings, depending on whether a derivative is designated and effective as part of a hedge transaction and, if it is, the type of hedgetransaction. Gains and losses on derivative instruments reported in accumulated other comprehensive losses are reclassified to theconsolidated statements of earnings, into the same line item as the impact of the underlying transaction, in the periods in which operating
results are affected by the hedged item. Cash flows from hedging instruments are classified in the same manner as the affected hedged
item in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Impairment of long-lived assets
PMI reviews long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in businesscircumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. PMI performs undiscounted operating cash
flow analyses to determine if an impairment exists. For purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment for assets held foruse, PMI groups assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which cash flows are separately identifiable. If an impairment is determined
to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on fair value. Impairment losses on assets to be disposed of, if any, are basedon the estimated proceeds to be received, less costs of disposal.
Impairment of investment in non-marketable equity securities
Non-marketable equity securities are subject to periodic impairment reviews during which PMI considers both qualitative and quantitative
factors that may have a significant impact on the investees' fair value. Upon determining that an impairment may exist, the security’sfair value is calculated and compared to its carrying value, and an impairment is recognized immediately if the carrying value exceeds
the fair value. For further details see Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH.
61

Impairment of investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that thecarrying amount of the investments may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recorded whenever a decline in value of anequity investment below its carrying amount is determined to be other than temporary. PMI determines whether a loss is other than
temporary by considering the length of time and extent to which the fair value of the equity investment has been less than the carrying
amount, the financial condition of the equity investment, and the intent to retain the investment for a period of time is sufficient to allow
for any anticipated recovery in market value.
Income taxes
Income taxes are provided on all earnings for jurisdictions outside the United States. These provisions, as well as state and local income
tax provisions, are determined on a separate company basis, and the related assets and liabilities are recorded in PMI’s consolidatedbalance sheets. Significant judgment is required in determining income tax provisions and in evaluating tax positions. PMI recognizes
accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of the provision for income taxes on the consolidated
statements of earnings. PMI recognizes income taxes associated with Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income ("GILTI") taxes as current
period expense rather than including these amounts in the measurement of deferred taxes.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The first-in, first-out and average cost methods are used to cost substantially all
inventories. It is a generally recognized industry practice to classify leaf tobacco inventory as a current asset, although part of suchinventory, because of the duration of the aging process, ordinarily would not be utilized within one year.
Leases
PMI determines that a contract contains a lease if the contract conveys a right to control the use of the identified asset for a period oftime in exchange for consideration. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. At lease commencement,
PMI recognizes lease liabilities and the corresponding right-of-use assets (at the present value of future payments) for predominately allof its operating leases. The recognition of the right-of-use asset and lease liability includes renewal options when it is reasonably certainthat they will be exercised. Certain of PMI’s leases include payments that are based on changes to an index or on actual usage. These
lease payments are adjusted periodically and are included within variable lease costs. PMI accounts for lease and nonlease components
as a single-lease component with the exception of its vehicle leases, of which PMI accounts for the lease components separately fromthe nonlease components. Additionally, leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not included in the right-of-use asset or leaseliability on the consolidated statement of financial position.
Marketing costs
PMI supports its products with advertising, adult consumer engagement and trade promotions. Such programs include, but are not limited
to, discounts, rebates, in-store display incentives, e-commerce, mobile and other digital platforms, adult consumer activation and promotion
activities, as well as costs associated with adult consumer experience outlets and other adult consumer touchpoints and volume-based
incentives. Advertising, as well as certain consumer engagement and trade activities costs, are expensed as incurred. Trade promotions
are recorded as a reduction of revenues based on amounts estimated as being due to customers at the end of a period, based principallyon historical utilization. For interim reporting purposes, advertising and certain consumer engagement expenses are charged to earnings
based on estimated sales and related expenses for the full year.
Revenue recognition
PMI recognizes revenue primarily through the manufacture and sale of cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products, including
reduced-risk products. The majority of PMI revenues are generated by sales through direct and indirect distribution networks with shortterm payment conditions and where control is typically transferred to the customer either upon shipment or delivery of goods. PMI
evaluates the transfer of control through evidence of the customer’s receipt and acceptance, transfer of title, PMI’s right to payment for
those products and the customer’s ability to direct the use of those products upon receipt. Typically, PMI’s performance obligations are
satisfied and revenue is recognized either upon shipment or delivery of goods.
In certain instances, PMI facilitates shipping and handling activities after control has transferred to the customer. PMI has elected torecord all shipping and handling activities as costs to fulfill a contract. The shipping and handling costs that have not been incurred at
the time revenue is recognized are accrued. The transaction price is typically based on the amount billed to the customer and includes
estimated variable consideration, where applicable. Such variable consideration is typically not constrained and is estimated based on
the most likely amount that PMI expects to be entitled to under the terms of the contracts with customers, historical experience of discount62

or rebate redemption, where relevant, and the terms of any underlying discount or rebate programs, which may change from time to timeas the business and product categories evolve. PMI has elected to exclude excise taxes collected from customers from the measurementof the transaction price, thereby presenting revenues net of excise taxes. Estimated costs associated with warranty programs are generally
provided for in cost of sales in the period the related revenues are recognized.
Stock-based compensation
PMI measures compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on date of grant and recognizes the compensation costs overthe service periods for awards expected to vest. PMI’s accounting policy is to estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited
and adjust the expense when it is no longer probable that the employee will fulfill the service condition. For further details, see Note 9.
Stock Plans.

Note 3.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net:
The movements in goodwill were as follows:(in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2018
Changes due to:Currency
Balances, December 31, 2018
Changes due to:Currency
Deconsolidation of RBH
Balances, December 31, 2019

MiddleSouth &
Latin
European
Eastern
East &Southeast East Asia & America &Union
EuropeAfricaAsia
Australia
CanadaTotal$
1,419 $
321 $102 $3,010 $
567 $
2,247 $
7,666

$

(62)
1,357

(18)
303

(15)
87

(215)
2,795

(31)
536

(136)
2,111

(477)
7,189

(19)

(3)

2

103

15

1,338 $

300 $

89 $

2,898 $

551 $

34
(1,463)682 $

132(1,463)
5,858

At December 31, 2019, goodwill primarily reflects PMI’s acquisitions in Colombia, Greece, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan and Serbia,
as well as the business combination in the Philippines.
For details on the deconsolidation of RBH, see Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH.
Details of other intangible assets were as follows:
December 31, 2019(in millions)

WeightedAverage
Remaining
Useful Life

Non-amortizable intangible
assetsGross
Carrying
Amount$Accumulated
Amortization

1,319

$

December 31, 2018

Net

Gross
Carrying
Amount1,319$

Accumulated
Amortization

1,269

Net
$

1,269

Amortizable intangible assets:
Trademarks

14 years

1,217 $

526

691

1,488 $

608

880

Distribution networks

8 years

113

72

41

141

82

59

Other*

9 years

106

44

62

107

37

70

2,755 $

642 $

2,113

3,005 $

727 $

2,278

Total other intangible assets$* Includes farmer contracts and intellectual property rights

63$

Non-amortizable intangible assets substantially consist of trademarks from PMI’s acquisitions in Indonesia and Mexico. The increasesince December 31, 2018, was due to currency movements of $50 million.
The decrease in the gross carrying amount of amortizable intangible assets from December 31, 2018, was mainly due to thedeconsolidation of RBH's trademarks of ($275 million) and distribution network of ($29 million), partially offset by currency
movements of $6 million.
The change in the accumulated amortization from December 31, 2018 was mainly due to the deconsolidation of RBH's trademarksof ($133 million) and distribution network of ($18 million), partially offset by the 2019 amortization of $66 million and by currency
movements of $2 million.
Amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be $73 million or less, assuming no additional transactions occurthat require the amortization of intangible assets.
During the second quarter of 2019, PMI completed its annual review of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for potential
impairment, and no impairment charges were required as a result of this review.

Note 4.
Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other:
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries:
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, PMI had total investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries of $1,053 million and $981 million, respectively,
which were accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Equity method investments are initially recorded at cost. Under theequity method of accounting, the investment is adjusted for PMI's proportionate share of earnings or losses, dividends, capital contributions,changes in ownership interests and movements in currency translation adjustments. The carrying value of our equity method investments
at December 31, 2019 and 2018, exceeded our share of the unconsolidated subsidiaries' book value by $901 million and $835 million,
respectively. The difference between the investment carrying value and the amount of underlying equity in net assets, excluding $863
million and $793 million attributable to goodwill as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, is being amortized on a straight-line
basis over the underlying assets' estimated useful lives of 10 to 20 years. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, PMI received year-to-date
dividends from unconsolidated subsidiaries of $100 million and $118 million, respectively.
PMI holds a 23% equity interest in Megapolis Distribution BV, the holding company of CJSC TK Megapolis, PMI's distributor in Russia(Eastern Europe segment).
PMI holds a 49% equity interest in United Arab Emirates-based Emirati Investors-TA (FZC) (“EITA”). PMI holds an approximate 25%
economic interest in Société des Tabacs Algéro-Emiratie (“STAEM”), an Algerian joint venture that is 51% owned by EITA and 49% by
the Algerian state-owned enterprise Management et Développement des Actifs et des Ressources Holding ("MADAR Holding"), whichis part of the Middle East & Africa segment, manufactures and distributes under license some of PMI’s brands.
The initial investments in Megapolis Distribution BV and EITA were recorded at cost and are included in investments in unconsolidated
subsidiaries and equity securities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Equity securities:
Following the deconsolidation of RBH, PMI recorded the continuing investment in RBH, PMI's wholly owned subsidiary, at fair valueof $3,280 million at the date of deconsolidation, within investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities. For further
details, see Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH. Transactions between PMI and RBH are considered to be related-party transactions fromthe date of deconsolidation and are included in the tables below.

64

Other related parties:
United Arab Emirates-based Trans-Emirates Trading and Investments (FZC) ("TTI") holds a 33% non-controlling interest in Philip Morris
Misr LLC ("PMM"), an entity incorporated in Egypt which is consolidated in PMI’s financial statements in the Middle East & Africa
segment. PMM sells, under license, PMI brands in Egypt through an exclusive distribution agreement with a local entity that is also
controlled by TTI.
IPM India, PMI's consolidated subsidiary in the South & Southeast Asia segment, has a non-controlling interest of 43.7% held by Godfrey
Phillips India Ltd, who also acts as contract manufacturer and distributor for IPM. Amounts in the tables below include transactions
between these related parties, beginning in 2019. Prior periods do not include these transactions as they were not material.
Financial activity with the above related parties:
PMI’s net revenues and expenses with the above related parties were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,(in millions)
Net revenues
Megapolis GroupOther
Net revenues (a)2019$Expenses:
Other
Expenses
(a)

2018

2017

$

2,236 $
1,015
3,251 $

1,994 $
720
2,714 $

1,874
647
2,521

$
$

63 $
63 $

21 $
21 $

23
23

Net revenues exclude excise taxes and VAT billed to customers. Prior year's amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current
year's presentation.

PMI’s balance sheet activity with the above related parties was as follows:
At December 31,(in millions)
Receivables:
Megapolis Group
Other
Receivables

2019$

Payables:
Other
Payables

2018

$

375 $
148
523 $

172
136
308

$
$

20 $
20 $

8
8

The activities with the above related parties are in the ordinary course of business, and are primarily for distribution, service fees, contract
manufacturing and license agreements. PMI eliminated its respective share of all significant intercompany transactions with the equity
method investees.

65

Note 5.
Product Warranty:
PMI's IQOS devices are subject to standard product warranties generally for a period of 12 months from the date of purchase or suchother periods as required by law. PMI generally provides in cost of sales for the estimated cost of warranty in the period the related
revenue is recognized. PMI assesses the adequacy of its accrued product warranties and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on actual
experience and changes in future estimates. Factors that affect product warranties may vary across markets but typically include device
version mix, product failure rates, logistics and service delivery costs, and warranty policies. PMI accounts for its product warranties
within other accrued liabilities. At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, these amounts were as follows:(in millions)
Balance at beginning of period
Changes due to:Warranties issued
Settlements
Currency
Balance at end of period$

At December 31,
2019
2018
67 $

71

$

303
(230)
—
140 $

179
(183)
—
67

Note 6.
Acquisitions:
On March 21, 2018, PMI acquired the remaining 49% interest in Tabacalera Costarricense, S.A. and Mendiola y Compañía, S.A. for a
net purchase price of $95 million, which includes $2 million of contingent consideration. As a result, PMI now owns 100% of these
Costa Rican affiliates. The purchase of the remaining 49% interest resulted in a decrease to PMI’s additional paid-in capital of $86
million.

Note 7.
Indebtedness:
Short-Term Borrowings
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, PMI’s short-term borrowings and related average interest rates consisted of the following:
December 31, 2019
AmountOutstanding(in millions)
Commercial paper

December 31, 2018

Average YearEnd Rate

AmountOutstanding

Average YearEnd Rate

$

—

—% $

—

—%

5.5

730
730

5.8

$

338
338

Bank loans$

Given the mix of subsidiaries and their respective local economic environments, the average interest rate for bank loans above can varysignificantly from day to day and country to country.
The fair values of PMI’s short-term borrowings at December 31, 2019 and 2018, based upon current market interest rates, approximate
the amounts disclosed above.

66

Long-Term Debt
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, PMI’s long-term debt consisted of the following:
December 31,(in millions)

2019

U.S. dollar notes, 1.875% to 6.375% (average interest rate 3.516%), due through 2044$

19,783

2018$

20,819Foreign currency obligations:Euro notes, 0.125% to 3.125% (average interest rate 1.950%), due through 2039
Swiss franc notes, 1.000% to 2.000% (average interest rate 1.521%), due through 2024
Other (average interest rate 3.125%), due through 2025
Less current portion of long-term debt
$

9,822

8,656

899

1,374

203
30,707
4,051
26,656180
31,0294,054
26,975$

Other debt:
Other foreign currency debt above includes mortgage debt in Switzerland and finance lease obligations at December 31, 2019 andDecember 31, 2018.
Debt Issuances Outstanding:
PMI’s debt issuances outstanding at December 31, 2019, were as follows:67

(in millions)
Type
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
U.S. dollar notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
EURO notes
Euro notes
Swiss franc notes
Swiss franc notes
Swiss franc notes

(a)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)

Face Value$300$1,000$1,000
$750
$350
$750
$500
$750
$750
$750
$600
$500
$500
$900

Interest
Rate
Floating
2.000%
4.500%
1.875%
4.125%
2.900%
2.625%
2.375%
2.500%
2.500%
2.625%
2.125%
3.600%
2.875%

$750
$750
$750
$500
$500
$750
$1,500
$750
$700
$750
$850
$750
$750
$500
€1,250 (approximately $1,621)€750 (approximately $1,029)€600 (approximately $761)€500 (approximately $582)€750 (approximately $972)€1,000 (approximately $1,372)€500 (approximately $557)€500 (approximately $697)€750 (approximately $835)€500 (approximately $648)€500 (approximately $578)

3.250%
3.375%
2.750%
3.125%
3.125%
3.375%
6.375%
4.375%
4.500%
3.875%
4.125%
4.875%
4.250%
4.250%
1.750%
1.875%
2.875%
0.625%
2.750%
2.875%
0.125%
2.875%
0.800%
3.125%
2.000%€500 (approximately $582)€750 (approximately $835)
CHF325 (approximately $334)
CHF300 (approximately $335)
CHF250 (approximately $283)

1.875%
1.450%
1.000%
2.000%
1.625%

68

Issuance

Maturity

February 2017
February 2017
March 2010
February 2016
May 2011
November 2011
February 2017
August 2017
August 2012
November 2017
March 2013
May 2016
November 2013
May 2019

February 2020
February 2020
March 2020
February 2021
May 2021
November 2021
February 2022
August 2022
August 2022
November 2022
March 2023
May 2023
November 2023
May 2024

November 2014
August 2015
February 2016
August 2017
November 2017
May 2019
May 2008
November 2011
March 2012
August 2012
March 2013
November 2013
November 2014
May 2016
March 2013
March 2014
May 2012

November 2024
August 2025
February 2026
August 2027
March 2028
August 2029
May 2038
November 2041
March 2042
August 2042
March 2043
November 2043
November 2044
November 2044
March 2020
March 2021
May 2024

November 2017
March 2013
March 2014
August 2019
May 2014
August 2019
June 2013
May 2016
November 2017
August 2019
September 2012
December 2011
May 2014

November 2024
March 2025
March 2026
August 2026
May 2029
August 2031
June 2033
May 2036
November 2037
August 2039
September 2020
December 2021
May 2024

(a)(b)

These notes are a further issuance of the 4.250% notes issued by PMI in November 2014.
USD equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance.

The net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above were used for general corporate purposes, including working
capital requirements and repurchase of PMI's common stock until 2015.
Aggregate maturities:
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows:(in millions)

2020

$

4,051

2021

3,015

2022

2,764

2023

1,607

2024

3,283

2025-2029

6,332

2030-2034

1,400

Thereafter

8,510
30,962

Debt discounts(255)

Total long-term debt$

30,707

See Note 16. Fair Value Measurements for additional disclosures related to the fair value of PMI’s debt.
Credit Facilities
On January 28, 2019, PMI entered into an agreement to extend the term of its $2.0 billion 364-day revolving credit facility from February
5, 2019, to February 4, 2020.
At December 31, 2019, PMI’s total committed credit facilities and commercial paper outstanding were as follows:Type(in billions of dollars)Committed
CreditFacilities

364-day revolving credit, expiring February 4, 2020$

2.0

Multi-year revolving credit, expiring February 28, 2021

2.5

Multi-year revolving credit, expiring October 1, 2022

3.5

Total facilities$

Commercial paper outstanding

Commercial
Paper

8.0
$

—

At December 31, 2019, there were no borrowings under these committed credit facilities, and the entire committed amounts were available
for borrowing.
Each of these facilities requires PMI to maintain a ratio of consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization(“consolidated EBITDA”) to consolidated interest expense of not less than 3.5 to 1.0 on a rolling four-quarter basis. At December 31,
2019, PMI’s ratio calculated in accordance with the agreements was 11.2 to 1.0. These facilities do not include any credit rating triggers,
material adverse change clauses or any provisions that could require PMI to post collateral. The terms “consolidated EBITDA” and“consolidated interest expense,” both of which include certain adjustments, are defined in the facility agreements previously filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
69

On January 31, 2020, PMI entered into an agreement to amend and extend the term of its $2 billion 364-day revolving credit facility
from February 4, 2020, to February 2, 2021.
In addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above, certain subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet theirrespective working capital needs. These credit arrangements, which amounted to approximately $2.7 billion at December 31, 2019, and$3.3 billion at December 31, 2018, are for the sole use of the subsidiaries. Borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $338
million at December 31, 2019, and $730 million at December 31, 2018.

Note 8.
Capital Stock:
Shares of authorized common stock are 6.0 billion; issued, repurchased and outstanding shares were as follows:

Balances, January 1, 2017

Shares Issued

SharesRepurchased

SharesOutstanding

2,109,316,331(557,930,784)

1,551,385,547

1,832,215

1,832,215(556,098,569)

1,553,217,762

1,361,959

1,361,959(554,736,610)

1,554,579,721

1,314,942

1,314,942(553,421,668)

1,555,894,663

Issuance of stock awards
Balances, December 31, 2017

2,109,316,331

Issuance of stock awards
Balances, December 31, 2018

2,109,316,331

Issuance of stock awards
2,109,316,331

Balances, December 31, 2019

At December 31, 2019, 27,371,404 shares of common stock were reserved for stock awards under PMI’s stock plans, and 250 million
shares of preferred stock, without par value, were authorized but unissued. PMI currently has no plans to issue any shares of preferredstock.

Note 9.
Stock Plans:
In May 2017, PMI’s shareholders approved the Philip Morris International Inc. 2017 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”).
Under the 2017 Plan, PMI may grant to eligible employees restricted shares and restricted share units, performance-based cash incentive
awards and performance-based equity awards. Up to 25 million shares of PMI’s common stock may be issued under the 2017 Plan. At
December 31, 2019, shares available for grant under the 2017 Plan were 20,127,360.
In May 2017, PMI’s shareholders also approved the Philip Morris International Inc. 2017 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (the “2017 Non-Employee Directors Plan”). A non-employee director is defined as a member of the PMI Board of Directors
who is not a full-time employee of PMI or of any corporation in which PMI owns, directly or indirectly, stock possessing at least 50%of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote in the election of directors in such corporation. Up to 1 million
shares of PMI common stock may be awarded under the 2017 Non-Employee Directors Plan. At December 31, 2019, shares available
for grant under the plan were 954,084.
Restricted share unit (RSU) awards
PMI may grant RSU awards to eligible employees; recipients may not sell, assign, pledge or otherwise encumber such awards. Suchawards are subject to forfeiture if certain employment conditions are not met. RSU awards generally vest on the third anniversary of the
grant date. RSU awards do not carry voting rights, although they do earn dividend equivalents.
70During 2019, the activity for RSU awards was as follows:
WeightedAverage Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share

Number of
SharesBalance at January 1, 2019
Granted
VestedForfeited
Balance at December 31, 2019

3,318,795 $
1,726,760(1,126,057)(193,628)

96.26
77.28
89.56
89.36

3,725,870 $89.85

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the weighted-average grant date fair value of the RSU awards granted to
PMI employees and the recorded compensation expense related to RSU awards were as follows:(in millions, except per RSU
award granted)

Total WeightedAverage Grant
Date Fair Value of
RSU Awards
GrantedWeightedAverage Grant
Date Fair ValuePer RSU Award
Granted

2019

$

133

$

77.28 $

118

2018

$

129

$

100.19 $

114

2017

$

119

$

98.59 $

111

Compensation
Expense related
to RSU Awards

The fair value of the RSU awards at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the restriction period, typically three years after thedate of the award, or upon death, disability or reaching the age of 58. As of December 31, 2019, PMI had $124 million of total unrecognizedcompensation costs related to non-vested RSU awards. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
approximately two years, or upon death, disability or reaching the age of 58.
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, share and fair value information for PMI RSU awards that vested were as
follows:(dollars in millions)Shares of RSU
Awards that Vested

Grant Date Fair
Value of Vested
Shares of RSU
AwardsTotal Fair Valueof RSU Awards
that Vested

2019

1,126,057

$

101 $

95

2018

1,451,876

$

121 $

149

2017

2,022,856

$

158 $

208

Performance share unit (PSU) awards
PMI may grant PSU awards to certain executives; recipients may not sell, assign, pledge or otherwise encumber such awards. The PSU
awards require the achievement of certain performance factors, which are predetermined at the time of grant, typically over a three-year
performance cycle with performance metrics for such PSUs consisting of PMI’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) relative to a predetermined
peer group and on an absolute basis (50% weight), PMI’s currency-neutral compound annual adjusted operating income growth rate,
excluding acquisitions (30% weight), and PMI’s performance against specific measures of PMI's transformation (20% weight). The
aggregate of the weighted performance factors for the three metrics determines the percentage of PSUs that will vest at the end of thethree-year performance cycle. The minimum percentage of such PSUs that can vest is zero, with a target percentage of 100 and a maximum
percentage of 200. Each such vested PSU entitles the participant to one share of common stock. An aggregate weighted PSU performancefactor of 100 will result in the targeted number of PSUs being vested. At the end of the performance cycle, participants are entitled toan amount equivalent to the accumulated dividends paid on common stock during the performance cycle for the number of shares earned.
PSU awards do not carry voting rights.
71During 2019, the activity for PSU awards was as follows:

Number of
SharesBalance at January 1, 2019
Granted
VestedForfeited
Balance at December 31, 2019

Grant Date
Fair Value
Subject to Other
Performance
Factors Per Share

Grant Date
Fair Value
Subject to TSR
Performance
Factor Per Share

1,194,970 $
647,700(330,616)(164,594)

95.85 $
77.23
89.02
90.28

117.0983.59
104.60107.091,347,460

88.19 $

107.61$

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the grant date fair value of the PSU awards granted to PMI employees andthe recorded compensation expense related to PSU awards were as follows:

2019

PSU Grant Date Fair Value
Subject to Other
Performance Factors
Per PSU
Total
Award
$
30 $
77.23

PSU Grant Date Fair Value
Subject to TSR
Performance Factor
Per PSU
Total
Award
$
21 $
83.59

$

54

2018
2017

$
$

$
$

$
$

24
37

(in millions, except per PSU award
granted)

20 $
19 $

100.69
98.29

24 $
25 $

118.98128.72Compensation
Expense related
to PSU Awards
Total

The grant date fair value of the PSU awards subject to the other performance factors was determined by using the average of the highand low market price of PMI’s stock at the date of the grant. The grant date fair value of the PSU market-based awards subject to the
TSR performance factor was determined by using the Monte Carlo simulation model. The following assumptions were used to determine
the grant date fair value of the PSU awards subject to the TSR performance factor for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and2017:

Risk-free interest rate (a)For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018

2017

2.4%

1.5%

21.4%

Expected volatility

2.3%
(b)

19.6%

(c)

15.8%

(c)

(a)

Based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve.
Determined using the observed historical volatility.
(c)
Determined using a weighted-average of historical and implied volatility.
(b)

The fair value of the PSU award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period, which is typically three years
after the date of the award, or upon death, disability or reaching the age of 58. As of December 31, 2019, PMI had $33 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested PSU awards. This cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle
period of approximately two years, or upon death, disability or reaching the age of 58.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, share and fair value information for PMI PSU awards that vested were as follows:(dollars in millions)2019

Shares of PSU
Awards that Vested
330,616

Grant Date Fair
Value of Vested
Shares of PSU
Awards$32 $During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no PSU awards that vested.

72

Total Fair Valueof PSU Awards
that Vested
28Note 10.
Earnings per Share:
Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities
and therefore are included in PMI’s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method.
Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) were calculated using the following:(in millions)

For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017

Net earnings attributable to PMI

$

7,185

Less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards$

17

Net earnings for basic and diluted EPS

$

7,168

7,911

$

16
$

7,895

6,035
14

$

6,021

Weighted-average shares for basic EPS

1,555

1,555

1,552

Plus contingently issuable performance stock units (PSUs)
Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS

1
1,556

—
1,555

1
1,553

For the 2019, 2018 and 2017 computations, there were no antidilutive stock options.

Note 11.
Income Taxes:
Earnings before income taxes and provision for income taxes consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018and 2017:
2019(in millions)

Earnings before income taxes

2018

$

9,872

$

$

17
24
41

$

2017

10,671$

10,589

120 $
(113)

1,662
(384)

7

1,278

2,425
13
2,438

3,146
(117)
3,029

Provision for income taxes:
United States federal and state:
Current
Deferred
Total United States
Outside United States:

2,417
(165)
2,252

Current
Deferred
Total outside United States
Total provision for income taxes

$

2,293

$

2,445

$

4,307

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law. Accordingly, PMI recorded a provisional charge of $1.6 billion in its
2017 income tax provision, including a charge for the transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings of $1.4 billion (which represented
the transition tax of $2.2 billion, net of a reversal of $0.7 billion of previously recorded deferred tax liabilities on part of its accumulated
foreign earnings and other items of $0.1 billion) and $0.2 billion due to the re-measurement of U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities
applying the U.S. federal corporate tax rate of 21%.
PMI completed its analysis of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act during 2018 and adjusted the 2017 provisional estimates to the final amounts
based on its 2017 U.S. federal income tax return as filed. Accordingly, PMI recorded in its income tax provision a charge of $31 million
73

representing a current income tax charge of $185 million, primarily due to an increase in its aggregate foreign cash position used todetermine PMI's final 2017 transition tax liability, mostly offset by a deferred income tax benefit of $154 million primarily due to therecognition of deferred tax assets for net operating losses in the state of New York. Updates to the provisional estimates have beenrecorded in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118").
At December 31, 2017, PMI recorded an income tax payable of $1.7 billion attributable to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, of which $1.6
billion was recorded in "income taxes and other liabilities" on PMI's consolidated balance sheet. The income tax payable of $1.7 billion
represented the transition tax of $2.2 billion, partially offset by foreign tax credits related to foreign withholding taxes previously paidof $0.5 billion. The income tax payable is due over an eight-year period beginning in 2018. In December 2018, PMI recorded an increase
to income tax payable of $0.1 billion related to PMI’s transition tax liability, in accordance with SAB 118. At December 31, 2019 andDecember 31, 2018, $1.2 billion and $1.5 billion of PMI's remaining transition tax liability, respectively, was recorded in "income taxes
and other liabilities" on PMI's consolidated balance sheet.
At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, U.S. federal and foreign deferred income taxes have been provided on all accumulated
earnings of PMI's foreign subsidiaries.
In accordance with the alternatives provided by ASU 2018-02 "Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income," PMI has elected not to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from accumulated othercomprehensive losses to retained earnings.
PMI is regularly examined by tax authorities around the world and is currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions. The U.S.
federal statute of limitations remains open for the years 2015 and onward. Foreign and U.S. state jurisdictions have statutes of limitations
generally ranging from three to five years. Years still open to examination by foreign tax authorities in major jurisdictions include
Germany (2015 onward), Indonesia (2014 onward), Russia (2017 onward), Switzerland (2017 onward), and Turkey (2014 onward).
It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close, which could result in a change in unrecognizedtax benefits, along with related interest and penalties. An estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:(in millions)

2019$

Balance at January 1,
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of previous years
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations
Settlements
Other

$

Balance at December 31,

2018

2017

56 $
10
1
(2)
(1)

145 $
10
15
(94)
(3)

79
71
5
—
(7)

—
(1)

(19)

(4)
1
145

63

2
56

$

$

Unrecognized tax benefits and PMI’s liability for contingent income taxes, interest and penalties were as follows:(in millions)

December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

Unrecognized tax benefits

$

$

$

63

56

145

Accrued interest and penalties

16

12

23

Tax credits and other indirect benefits

(12)

(14)

(35)
133

Liability for tax contingencies

$

67

$

54

$

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate was $50 million at December 31, 2019.
The remainder, if recognized, would principally affect deferred taxes.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, PMI recognized income (expense) in its consolidated statements of earnings of$(4) million, $4 million and $(11) million, respectively, related to interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions.

74

The effective income tax rate on pre-tax earnings differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the following reasons for the years
ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
U.S. federal statutory rate
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Foreign rate differences
Dividend repatriation cost
Global intangible low-taxed income
U.S. state taxes
Foreign derived intangible income

2019
21.0%

2018
21.0%

2017
35.0%

1.8
(0.5)
1.4
0.7
(1.2)
—
23.2%

1.3
2.5
1.2
(1.1)
(1.1)
(0.9)

(12.2)

Other
Effective tax rate

16.4

1.5
40.7%

22.9%

The 2019 effective tax rate increased 0.3 percentage points to 23.2%. The change in the effective tax rate for 2019, as compared to 2018,
was unfavorably impacted by changes in earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction and U.S. state deferred income tax expense, partially offset
by the reversal of a deferred tax liability on the unremitted earnings of PMI's Canadian subsidiary, RBH ($49 million), a reduction inestimated U.S. federal income tax on dividend repatriation for the years 2015-2018 ($67 million), and other repatriation cost differences.
The 2018 effective tax rate decreased 17.8 percentage points to 22.9%. The change in the effective tax rate for 2018, as compared to2017, was primarily due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which reduced the U.S. federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, in addition to
repatriation cost differences and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction.
The 2017 effective tax rate increased 12.8 percentage points to 40.7%. The change in the effective tax rate for 2017, as compared to2016, was primarily due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. In addition to the transition tax, which resulted in a net tax charge of $1.4 billion,
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also included a reduction in the U.S. income tax rate from 35% to 21%, as of January 1, 2018. This change
in income tax rate required a re-measurement of PMI's U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017, resulting in a tax
charge of $0.2 billion.
The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to deferred income tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:
At December 31,
2019
2018

(in millions)Deferred income tax assets:
Accrued postretirement and postemployment benefits
Accrued pension costs
Inventory$

Accrued liabilities
Net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits
Other
Total deferred income tax assets
Less: valuation allowance
Deferred income tax assets, net of valuation allowance
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Trade names
Property, plant and equipment
Unremitted earnings
Foreign exchange
Total deferred income tax liabilities
Net deferred income tax assets

75

$

184 $
620
176
130
486
101
1,697
(304)

193
390
136
138
452
37
1,346
(257)

1,393

1,089

(469)
(180)
(243)
(256)
(1,148)

(508)

245

(222)
(123)
(157)
(1,010)$79

At December 31, 2019, PMI recorded deferred tax assets for net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits of $486 million, with varying
dates of expiration, primarily after 2024, including $98 million with an unlimited carryforward period. At December 31, 2019, PMI hasrecorded a valuation allowance of $304 million against deferred tax assets that do not meet the more-likely-than not recognition threshold.
At December 31, 2018, PMI recorded deferred tax assets for net operating loss carryforwards of $452 million, with varying dates of
expiration, primarily after 2023, including $87 million with an unlimited carryforward period. At December 31, 2018, PMI has recorded
a valuation allowance of $257 million against deferred tax assets that do not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold. The
increases in deferred tax assets for net operating loss carryforwards and the valuation allowance during 2018 are primarily due to law
changes associated with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, as discussed above.

Note 12.
Segment Reporting:
PMI’s subsidiaries and affiliates are engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products, including
RRPs, in markets outside of the United States of America. In addition, PMI ships a version of its Platform 1 device and its consumables
authorized by the FDA to Altria Group, Inc. for sale in the United States under license. Operating segments for PMI are organized bygeographic region and managed by segment managers who are responsible for the operating and financial results of the regions inclusiveof all product categories sold in the region. PMI’s operating segments are the European Union; Eastern Europe; Middle East & Africa;
South & Southeast Asia; East Asia & Australia; and Latin America & Canada. PMI records net revenues and operating income to its
segments based upon the geographic area in which the customer resides. Revenues from shipments of Platform 1 devices, heated tobacco
units and accessories to Altria Group, Inc. for sale under license in the United States are included in Net Revenues of the Latin America& Canada segment.
PMI’s chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance and allocates resources based on regional operating income, which
includes results from all product categories sold in each region. Interest expense, net, and provision for income taxes are centrally
managed and, accordingly, such items are not presented by segment since they are excluded from the measure of segment profitability
reviewed by management. Information about total assets by segment is not disclosed because such information is not reported to or usedby PMI’s chief operating decision maker. Segment goodwill and other intangible assets, net, are disclosed in Note 3. Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, net. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2. Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies.
PMI disaggregates its net revenue from contracts with customers by both geographic location and product category for each of PMI's six
operating segments, as PMI believes this best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of its revenue and cash flows areaffected by economic factors.
Net revenues by segment were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017

(in millions)
Net revenues:
European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada
Net revenues

$

$

9,817
3,282
4,042
5,094
5,364
2,206
29,805

$

$

9,298
2,921
4,114
4,656
5,580
3,056
29,625

$

$

8,318
2,711
3,988
4,417
6,373
2,941
28,748

Total net revenues attributable to customers located in Japan, PMI's largest market in terms of net revenues, were $3.9 billion, $3.8 billion
and $4.7 billion in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Total net revenues attributable to customers located in Indonesia were $3.1 billion,$3.1 billion and $3.2 billion in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. PMI had one customer in the East Asia & Australia segment that
accounted for 13%, 13% and 16% of PMI’s consolidated net revenues, and one customer in the European Union segment that accounted
for 10%, 10% and 10% of PMI’s consolidated net revenues in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

76

PMI's net revenues by product category were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017

(in millions)Combustible products:
European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada
Total combustible products$$

Reduced-risk products:
European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada
Total reduced-risk products
Total PMI net revenues

$

8,093
2,438
3,721
5,094
2,693
2,179
24,218

$

1,724
844

$

$

321
—
2,671
27
5,587

$

29,805

$

8,433
2,597
3,732
4,656
3,074
3,037
25,529

$

865
324

$

$

8,048
2,657
3,893
4,417
3,156
2,937
25,107
269
55

$

382
—
2,506
19
4,096

$

94
—
3,218
4
3,640

$

29,625$28,748

Note: Sum of product categories or Regions might not foot to total PMI due to roundings.

Net revenues related to combustible products refer to the operating revenues generated from the sale of these products, including shippingand handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. These net revenue amounts consist of
the sale of PMI's cigarettes and other tobacco products combined. Other tobacco products primarily include roll-your-own and makeyour-own cigarettes, pipe tobacco, cigars and cigarillos and do not include reduced-risk products.
Net revenues related to reduced-risk products refer to the operating revenues generated from the sale of these products, including shippingand handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. These net revenue amounts consist of
the sale of PMI's heated tobacco units, IQOS devices and related accessories, and other nicotine-containing products, which primarily
include PMI's e-vapor products.
PMI recognizes revenue, when control is transferred to the customer, typically either upon shipment or delivery of goods.
Operating income by segment were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,(in millions)

2019

Operating income:
European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada$$

Operating income

77

3,970
547
1,684
2,163
1,932
235
10,531

2018
$

$

4,105
902
1,627
1,747
1,851
1,145
11,377

2017
$

$

3,691
887
1,884
1,514
2,608
997
11,581

Items affecting the comparability of results from operations were as follows:•

Russia excise and VAT audit charge - See Note 18. Contingencies for details of the $374 million pre-tax charge included in the
Eastern Europe segment for the year ended December 31, 2019.

•

Asset impairment and exit costs - See Note 21. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs for details of the $422 million pre-tax charge forthe year ended December 31, 2019, as well as a breakdown of these costs by segment.

•

Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense - See Note 18. Contingencies and Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the$194 million pre-tax charge included in the Latin America & Canada segment for the year ended December 31, 2019.

•

Loss on deconsolidation of RBH - See Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the $239 million loss included in the Latin
America & Canada segment for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Other segment data were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,(in millions)2019

Depreciation expense:
European Union$

Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada
Other$

Total depreciation expense

2018
254
147
90
142
185
69
887
11
898

$

$

2017
269
101
105
154
173
94
896
11
907

$

213
76
88
153
160
85
775
12
787

$

For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017

(in millions)
Capital expenditures:
European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada

$

Other
$

Total capital expenditures

78

466
132
35
100
67
52
852
—
852

$

$

813
136
65
129
215
74
1,432
4
1,436

$

$

956
97
85
140
87
175
1,540
8
1,548

At December 31,(in millions)2019

Long-lived assets:
European Union
Eastern Europe
Middle East & Africa
South & Southeast Asia
East Asia & Australia
Latin America & Canada$

Total long-lived assets
Other$

Total property, plant and equipment, net and Other assets

4,275
774
369
1,361
829
478
8,086
516
8,602

2018
$

4,216
547
362
1,297
781
779
7,982
664
8,646

2017

$

$

$

4,130
546
430
1,419
659
885
8,069
1,126
9,195

Long-lived assets consist of non-current assets other than goodwill; other intangible assets, net; deferred tax assets, investments inunconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities, and financial instruments. PMI's largest markets in terms of long-lived assets are Italy,
Switzerland and Indonesia. Total long-lived assets located in Italy, which is reflected in the European Union segment above, were $1.1
billion, $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Total long-lived assets located in Switzerland,
which is reflected in the European Union segment above, were $1.1 billion, $1.0 billion and $0.9 billion at December 31, 2019, 2018and 2017, respectively. Total long-lived assets located in Indonesia, which is reflected in the South & Southeast Asia segment above,were $0.8 billion, $0.7 billion and $0.8 billion at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Note 13.
Benefit Plans:
Pension coverage for employees of PMI’s subsidiaries is provided, to the extent deemed appropriate, through separate plans, many ofwhich are governed by local statutory requirements. In addition, PMI provides health care and other benefits to substantially all U.S.
retired employees and certain non-U.S. retired employees. In general, health care benefits for non-U.S. retired employees are covered
through local government plans.
Pension and other employee benefit costs per the consolidated statements of earnings consisted of the following for December 31, 2019,2018 and 2017:(in millions)2019$

Net pension costs (income)Net postemployment costs
Net postretirement costs
Total pension and other employee benefit costs

$

79

2018
(18) $
100
7
89 $

2017
(51) $
80
12
41 $

(20)
85
13
78

Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans
Obligations and Funded Status
The postretirement health care plans are not funded. The projected benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status of PMI’s pension
plans, and the accumulated benefit obligation and net amount accrued for PMI's postretirement health care plans, at December 31, 2019and 2018, were as follows:
Pension(1)(in millions)

Postretirement

2019
2018
2019
2018
$
9,152 $
209 $
9,028 $
248
214
2
210
4
118
7
109
9
(250)
(8)
(218)
(8)
50
1
—
1,430
27
210
(34)
(196)
29
—
(9)
(166)
(42)
—
—
(5)
35
8
(1)
10,612
190
9,152
209
6,888
7,598
(447)
1,211

Benefit obligation at January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Net benefits paid
Settlement and curtailment
Actuarial losses (gains)
Currency
Deconsolidation of RBH
Other
Benefit obligation at December 31,
Fair value of plan assets at January 1,
Actual return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Standard employee contributions
Net benefits paid
Settlement and curtailment
Currency
Deconsolidation of RBH
Fair value of plan assets at December 31,
Net pension and postretirement liability recognized at December 31,

$

200
44
(250)

110
24
(218)

—
7
(172)

—
(179)

7,928

—
6,888

(2,684) $(2,264) $(190) $

(209)

(1) Primarily non-U.S. based defined benefit retirement plans.

At December 31, 2019, actuarial losses (gains) consisted primarily of losses for assumption changes related to lower discount rate for
Swiss, German and Dutch plans. At December 31, 2018, actuarial losses (gains) consisted of losses for experience differences related tothe change in population profile, coupled with updated mortality table assumptions for the Swiss plan.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Swiss pension plan represented 62% and 60% of the benefit obligation, respectively, andapproximately 59% and 57% of the fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. At December 31, 2019 and2018, the U.S. pension plan represented 4% and 4% of the benefit obligation, respectively, and approximately 4% and 4% of the fairvalue of plan assets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

80

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the amounts recognized on PMI's consolidated balance sheets for the pension and postretirement plans
were as follows:
Pension(in millions)

2019

Other assets

$

$

2018

2019

2018

43 $
(23)

37
(20) $

(8) $

(10)

(2,704)(2,684) $(2,281)(2,264) $(182)(190) $

(199)
(209)

Accrued liabilities — employment costs
Long-term employment costs

Postretirement

The accumulated benefit obligation, which represents benefits earned to date, for the pension plans was $9,969 million and $8,557 million
at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
For pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets, the accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan
assets were $8,962 million and $6,825 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019. The accumulated benefit obligation and fair valueof plan assets were $7,641 million and $5,866 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2018.
For pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets, the projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets
were $10,364 million and $7,654 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019. The projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan
assets were $8,807 million and $6,504 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2018.
The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine PMI’s pension and postretirement benefit obligations at
December 31:
Pension2019

2018

Discount rate

0.83%

1.61%

Rate of compensation increase

1.82

1.86

Interest crediting rate

3.20

3.40

Postretirement
2019
2018
3.28%

3.97%

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year

6.21

6.17

Ultimate trend rate

5.09

4.59

2023

2040

Year that rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

The discount rate for the largest pension plans is based on a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality corporate bonds that
produces a cash flow pattern equivalent to each plan’s expected benefit payments. The discount rate for the remaining plans is developed
from local bond indices that match local benefit obligations as closely as possible.

81Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Net periodic pension and postretirement health care costs consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and2017:
Pension(in millions)

Service cost

2019$

Postretirement

2018

214

$

2017

210

$

2019

208

2018

$

2

2017

$

4

$

4

Interest cost

118

109

108

7

9

8

Expected return on plan assets

(328)

(349)

(326)

—

—

—

Net losses

189

172

186

—

4

5

Prior service cost

(1)

2

6

—

(1)

—

Settlement and curtailment

4

15

6

—

—

—

Amortization:

Net periodic pension and postretirement costs

$

196

$

159

$

188

$

9

$

16

$

17

Settlement and curtailment charges were due primarily to employee severance and early retirement programs.
The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine PMI’s net pension and postretirement health care costs:
2019

Pension
2018

2017

2019

Postretirement
2018

2017

Discount rate - service cost

2.14%

1.92%

1.68%

3.97%

3.79%

3.68%

Discount rate - interest cost

1.35

1.25

1.27

3.97

3.79

3.68

Expected rate of return on plan assets

4.70

4.76

4.80

Rate of compensation increase

1.86

1.65

1.68

Interest crediting rate

3.40

3.40

3.40
6.17

6.17

7.15

Health care cost trend rate

PMI’s expected rate of return on pension plan assets is determined by the plan assets’ historical long-term investment performance, current
asset allocation and estimates of future long-term returns by asset class.
PMI and certain of its subsidiaries sponsor defined contribution plans. Amounts charged to expense for defined contribution plans totaled$63 million, $66 million and $58 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Plan Assets
PMI’s investment strategy for pension plans is based on an expectation that equity securities will outperform debt securities over the longterm. Accordingly, the target allocation of PMI’s plan assets is broadly characterized as approximately 60% in equity securities andapproximately 40% in debt securities and other assets. The strategy primarily utilizes indexed U.S. equity securities, international equity
securities and investment-grade debt securities. PMI’s plans have no investments in hedge funds, private equity or derivatives. PMI
attempts to mitigate investment risk by rebalancing between equity and debt asset classes once a year or as PMI’s contributions andbenefit payments are made.

82

The fair value of PMI’s pension plan assets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, by asset category was as follows:

Asset Category(in millions)

Cash and cash equivalents
Equity securities:
U.S. securities
International securities
Investment funds(a)International government bonds
Corporate bonds
Other
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy
Investment funds measured at net
asset value(b)Total assets

At
December 31,
2019
$
276

Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets/Liabilities(Level 1)
$
276

$

170
563
6,125
197
282
6
7,619

170
563
4,625
137
282
6
6,059

$

7,928

$

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs(Level 2)

$

1,500
60

$

1,560

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs(Level 3)

$

—

309

(a)

Investment funds whose objective seeks to replicate the returns and characteristics of specified market indices (primarily MSCI — Europe,
Switzerland, North America, Asia Pacific, Japan; Russell 3000; S&P 500 for equities, and Citigroup EMU and JP Morgan EMBI for bonds),
primarily consist of mutual funds, common trust funds and commingled funds. Of these funds, 63% are invested in U.S. and international equities;
16% are invested in U.S. and international government bonds; 12% are invested in real estate and other money markets, and 9% are invested incorporate bonds.

(b)

In accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 820-10, certain investments measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient
have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fairvalue hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.

Asset Category(in millions)

Cash and cash equivalents
Equity securities:
U.S. securities
International securities
Investment funds(a)International government bonds
Corporate bonds
Other
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy
Investment funds measured at net
asset value(b)Total assets(a)At
December 31,
2018

Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets/Liabilities(Level 1)

$

84

$

84

$

139
442
5,508
176
232
19
6,600

$

139
442
3,595
120
232
19
4,631

$

288
6,888

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs(Level 2)

$

1,913
56

$

1,969

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs(Level 3)$—

Investment funds whose objective seeks to replicate the returns and characteristics of specified market indices (primarily MSCI — Europe,
Switzerland, North America, Asia Pacific, Japan; Russell 3000; S&P 500 for equities, and Citigroup EMU and Barclays Capital U.S. for bonds),
primarily consist of mutual funds, common trust funds and commingled funds. Of these funds, 57% were invested in U.S. and international equities;
20% were invested in U.S. and international government bonds; 12% were invested in real estate and other money markets, and 11% were invested
in corporate bonds.

83

(b)

In accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 820-10, certain investments measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient
have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fairvalue hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.

See Note 16. Fair Value Measurements for a discussion of the fair value of pension plan assets.
PMI makes, and plans to make, contributions to the extent that they are tax deductible and to meet specific funding requirements of its
funded pension plans. Currently, PMI anticipates making contributions of approximately $77 million in 2020 to its pension plans, basedon current tax and benefit laws. However, this estimate is subject to change as a result of changes in tax and other benefit laws, as wellas asset performance significantly above or below the assumed long-term rate of return on pension assets, or changes in interest andcurrency rates.
The estimated future benefit payments from PMI pension plans at December 31, 2019, are as follows:(in millions)

$

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025 - 2029

317
340
341
351
361
2,008

PMI's expected future annual benefit payments for its postretirement health care plans are estimated to be not material through 2029.
Postemployment Benefit Plans
PMI and certain of its subsidiaries sponsor postemployment benefit plans covering substantially all salaried and certain hourly employees.
The cost of these plans is charged to expense over the working life of the covered employees. Net postemployment costs were $171
million, $158 million and $144 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The amounts recognized in accrued postemployment costs on PMI's consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, were$751 million and $708 million, respectively. The change in the liability is primarily due to actuarial losses of $152 million in 2019 resulting
from increased employee severance rate primarily in countries in the European Union segment, coupled with the periodic expense,
partially offset by cash payments.
The accrued postemployment costs were determined using a weighted-average discount rate of 3.0% and 3.1% in 2019 and 2018,
respectively; an assumed ultimate annual weighted-average turnover rate of 3.0% and 3.2% in 2019 and 2018, respectively; assumed
compensation cost increases of 2.6% in 2019 and 2.6% in 2018, and assumed benefits as defined in the respective plans. In accordancewith local regulations, certain postemployment plans are funded. As a result, the accrued postemployment costs disclosed above arepresented net of the related assets of $40 million and $38 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Postemployment costs
arising from actions that offer employees benefits in excess of those specified in the respective plans are charged to expense when incurred.
Comprehensive Earnings (Losses)
The amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive losses at December 31, 2019, consisted of the following:(in millions)

Net losses
Prior service cost
Net transition obligation
Deferred income taxes
Losses to be amortized

PostPostPension
retirement
employment
Total(63) $(775) $
(4,556)$(3,718) $
3
2
—
5
(4)
(4)
—
—
520
24
182
726
(37) $(593) $
(3,829)$(3,199) $84

The amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive losses at December 31, 2018, consisted of the following:(in millions)

Net losses
Prior service cost
Net transition obligation
Deferred income taxes
Losses to be amortized

PostPostretirement
employment
Total(41) $(702) $
(4,181)(3,438) $
(24)
(27)
3
—
(4)
(4)
—
—
379
20
164
563
(18) $(538) $
(3,646)(3,090) $Pension$$

The amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive losses at December 31, 2017, consisted of the following:(in millions)

Net losses
Prior service cost
Net transition obligation
Deferred income taxes
Losses to be amortized

PostPostretirement
employment
Total(80) $(617) $
(3,321)(2,624) $
(31)
(35)
4
—
(5)
(5)
—
—
327
28
186
541
(48) $(431) $
(2,816)(2,337) $Pension$$The movements in other comprehensive earnings (losses) during the year ended December 31, 2019, were as follows:(in millions)

Pension

Postretirement$$

Postemployment

Total

Amounts transferred to earnings as components of net periodic
benefit cost:
Amortization:
Net losses
Prior service cost
Other income/expense:
Net losses
Deferred income taxes

198
32

3 $
(1)

77
—

$

278
31

3
(51)
182

—
(1)
1

—
(17)
60

3
(69)
243

(521)
(2)

(150)
—

(698)
(2)

26
206
(291)

(27)
—
1
6
(20)

35
(115)

27
247
(426)

(109) $

(19) $(55) $ (183)

Other movements during the year:
Net losses
Prior service cost
Deconsolidation of RBH (net of deferred income taxes)
Deferred income taxes
Total movements in other comprehensive earnings (losses)

85$

The movements in other comprehensive earnings (losses) during the year ended December 31, 2018, were as follows:(in millions)

Pension

Postretirement$$

Postemployment

Total

Amounts transferred to earnings as components of net periodic
benefit cost:
Amortization:
Net losses
Prior service cost
Net transition obligation
Other income/expense:
Net losses
Deferred income taxes

180
—
1

Other movements during the year:
Net losses
Prior service cost

5 $
(1)
—

62
—
—

14
(28)

—
(1)

—
(14)

14
(43)

167

3

48

218

(1,008)

34
—
(7)

(147)

(1,121)

—
(8)
(155)

8
65
(1,048)(107) $

(830)

8

Deferred income taxes

80
(920)

Total movements in other comprehensive earnings (losses)

27(753) $

$

30

$

$

247
(1)
1

The movements in other comprehensive earnings (losses) during the year ended December 31, 2017, were as follows:(in millions)

Pension

Postretirement

Postemployment

Total

$

$

$

$

Amounts transferred to earnings as components of net periodic
benefit cost:
Amortization:
Net losses
Prior service cost
Other income/expense:
Net losses
Deferred income taxes
Other movements during the year:
Net losses
Prior service cost
Deferred income taxes

175
5

86

$

68
—

248
5

6
(10)

—
(1)

—
(20)

6
(31)

176

4

48

228

509
13
(13)

(12)

28
—
(9)

525
13
(17)

19

521

—
5
(7)

509
Total movements in other comprehensive earnings (losses)

5
—

685

$

(3) $

67

$

749

Note 14.
Additional Information:
For the Years Ended December 31,(in millions)

2019

2018

2017

Research and development expense

$

465

$

383

$

453

Advertising expense

$

730

$

896

$

830

Foreign currency net transaction (gains)/losses

$

(95)

$

21

$

49

Interest expense

$

796

$

855

$

1,096

Interest income
Interest expense, net
Total lease cost
(1)

(226)
$

570

$

332

(190)

(1)

(182)

$

665

$

914

$

312

$

313

For additional information on total lease costs, see Note 23. Leases.

Note 15.
Financial Instruments:
Overview
PMI operates in markets outside of the United States of America, with manufacturing and sales facilities in various locations around theworld. PMI utilizes certain financial instruments to manage foreign currency and interest rate exposure. Derivative financial instruments
are used by PMI principally to reduce exposures to market risks resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest
rates by creating offsetting exposures. PMI is not a party to leveraged derivatives and, by policy, does not use derivative financial
instruments for speculative purposes. Financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of
effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedged period. PMI
formally documents the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management
objectives, strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions and method of assessing hedge effectiveness. Additionally, forhedges of forecasted transactions, the significant characteristics and expected terms of the forecasted transaction must be specifically
identified, and it must be probable that each forecasted transaction will occur. If it were deemed probable that the forecasted transaction
would not occur, the gain or loss would be recognized in earnings.
PMI uses deliverable and non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts, foreign currency swaps and foreign currency options,collectively referred to as foreign exchange contracts ("foreign exchange contracts"), and interest rate contracts to mitigate its exposure
to changes in exchange and interest rates from third-party and intercompany actual and forecasted transactions. Both foreign exchange
contracts and interest rate contracts are collectively referred to as derivative contracts ("derivative contracts"). The primary currencies
to which PMI is exposed include the Euro, Indonesian rupiah, Japanese yen, Mexican peso, Philippine peso, Russian ruble and Swiss
franc. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, PMI had contracts with aggregate notional amounts of $24.1 billion and $27.4 billion, respectively.
Of the $24.1 billion aggregate notional amount at December 31, 2019, $2.8 billion related to cash flow hedges, $9.9 billion related tohedges of net investments in foreign operations and $11.4 billion related to other derivatives that primarily offset currency exposures onintercompany financing. Of the $27.4 billion aggregate notional amount at December 31, 2018, $3.2 billion related to cash flow hedges,$10.1 billion related to hedges of net investments in foreign operations and $14.1 billion related to other derivatives that primarily offset
currency exposures on intercompany financing.

87The fair value of PMI’s derivative exchange contracts included in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 and 2018,
were as follows:
Derivative Assets

Derivative Liabilities

Fair Value

Balance SheetClassification
Other current
assets(in millions)

Derivative contracts designated as
hedging instruments

2019$

Fair Value

Balance SheetClassification

2018

319

$

54

Other assets
Derivative contracts not designated as Other current
hedging instruments
assets

21

99

50

67

Other assets——

Total derivatives

$

390

$

2019

Other accrued
liabilities
Income taxes andother liabilities
Other accrued
liabilities
Income taxes andother liabilities

$

23

$

220

2018
$

47

301

525

70

46

25

13

419

$

631

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, PMI's cash flow and net investment hedging instruments impacted theconsolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive earnings as follows:(pre-tax, in millions)
Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in Other
Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) on Derivatives
2019
2018
2017
Derivatives in Cash Flow
Hedging Relationship
Derivative contracts$(20) $

28$

For the Year Ended December 31,
Statement of Earnings
Classification of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Other
Comprehensive
Earnings/(Losses) into
Earnings

Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Other
Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings
2019
2018
2017

(52)
Net revenues
Cost of sales
Marketing, administration andresearch costs
Interest expense, net

$

22
1

$

2
(8)

18 $
—

60
1

6
(1)

(7)
(41)

23 $

13

Derivatives in Net
Investment Hedging
Relationship
Derivative contracts
Total

$

369
349

$

324
352

(1,644)$ (1,696)

$

17

$

Cash Flow Hedges
PMI has entered into derivative contracts to hedge the foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks related to certain forecasted
transactions. Gains and losses associated with qualifying cash flow hedge contracts are deferred as components of accumulated othercomprehensive losses until the underlying hedged transactions are reported in PMI’s consolidated statements of earnings. As of
December 31, 2019, PMI has hedged forecasted transactions for periods not exceeding the next twelve months, with the exception of
one derivative contract that expires in May 2024. The impact of these hedges is primarily included in operating cash flows on PMI’s
consolidated statements of cash flows.

88Hedges of Net Investments in Foreign Operations
PMI designates certain foreign currency denominated debt and derivative contracts as net investment hedges, primarily of its Euro net
assets. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, these hedges of net investments resulted in gains (losses), net of income
taxes, of $470 million, $521 million and $(1,725) million, respectively, principally related to changes in the exchange rates between theEuro and U.S. dollar. These gains (losses) were reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive losses within currencytranslation adjustments and were substantially offset by the losses and gains generated on the underlying assets. For the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the gains for amounts excluded from the effectiveness testing recognized in earnings were $230 million
and $260 million, respectively. These gains were accounted for in interest expense, net, on the consolidated statement of earnings. The
premiums paid for, and settlements of, net investment hedges are included in investing cash flows on PMI’s consolidated statements ofcash flows.
Other Derivatives
PMI has entered into derivative contracts to hedge the foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks related to intercompany loans
between certain subsidiaries, and third-party loans. While effective as economic hedges, no hedge accounting is applied for these contracts;
therefore, the unrealized gains (losses) relating to these contracts are reported in marketing, administration and research costs in PMI’s
consolidated statements of earnings. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the gains (losses) from contracts for which
PMI did not apply hedge accounting were $(57) million, $405 million and $382 million, respectively. The gains (losses) from thesecontracts substantially offset the losses and gains generated by the underlying intercompany and third-party loans being hedged.
As a result, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, these items impacted the consolidated statement of earnings asfollows:(pre-tax, in millions)
Derivatives not Designated as
Hedging Instruments

Statement of Earnings
Classification of Gain/(Loss)

Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in Earnings
2019

2018

2017

Derivative contracts
Interest expense, net
Total

$

94

$

62

$

(60)

$

94

$

62

$

(60)

Qualifying Hedging Activities Reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses
Derivative gains or losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive losses are a result of qualifying hedging activity. Transfers ofthese gains or losses to earnings are offset by the corresponding gains or losses on the underlying hedged item. Hedging activity affected
accumulated other comprehensive losses, net of income taxes, as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2019(in millions)$

Gain as of January 1,
Derivative (gains)/losses transferred to earnings
Change in fair value

2018
35
(14)

$

(18)
$

Gain as of December 31,

3

$

2017
42
(31)
24
35

$

$

97
(11)
(44)
42

At December 31, 2019, PMI expects $22 million of derivative gains that are included in accumulated other comprehensive losses to bereclassified to the consolidated statement of earnings within the next 12 months. These gains are expected to be substantially offset by
the statement of earnings impact of the respective hedged transactions.
Contingent Features
PMI’s derivative instruments do not contain contingent features.

89Credit Exposure and Credit Risk
PMI is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by counterparties. While PMI does not anticipate non-performance, its
risk is limited to the fair value of the financial instruments less any cash collateral received or pledged. PMI actively monitors its exposure
to credit risk through the use of credit approvals and credit limits and by selecting and continuously monitoring a diverse group of majorinternational banks and financial institutions as counterparties.
Fair Value
See Note 16. Fair Value Measurements and Note 19. Balance Sheet Offsetting for additional discussion of derivative financial instruments.

Note 16.
Fair Value Measurements:
The authoritative guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (anexit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participantson the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The guidance describes three levels of input that may
be used to measure fair value, which are as follows:
Level 1—

Level 2—

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets
that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantiallythe full term of the assets or liabilities; andLevel 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets
or liabilities.
Equity Securities
The fair value of PMI’s equity securities, which are determined by using quoted prices in active markets, have been classified within
Level 1.
Derivative Financial Instruments
PMI assesses the fair value of its foreign exchange contracts and interest rate contracts using standard valuation models that use, as theirbasis, readily observable market inputs. The fair value of PMI’s foreign exchange forward contracts is determined by using the prevailingforeign exchange spot rates and interest rate differentials, and the respective maturity dates of the instruments. The fair value of PMI’s
currency options is determined by using a Black-Scholes methodology based on foreign exchange spot rates and interest rate differentials,
currency volatilities and maturity dates. PMI’s derivative financial instruments have been classified within Level 2 at December 31,
2019 and 2018. See Note 15. Financial Instruments for additional discussion of derivative financial instruments.
Pension Plan Assets
The fair value of pension plan assets, determined by using readily available quoted market prices in active markets, has been classified
within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy at December 31, 2019 and 2018. The fair value of pension plan assets, determined by using
quoted prices in markets that are not active, has been classified within Level 2 at December 31, 2019 and 2018. See Note 13. Benefit
Plans for additional discussion of pension plan assets.
Debt
The fair value of PMI’s outstanding debt, which is utilized solely for disclosure purposes, is determined using quotes and market interest
rates currently available to PMI for issuances of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The aggregate carrying value of PMI’s
debt, excluding short-term borrowings and $56 million of finance leases, was $30,651 million at December 31, 2019. The aggregate
carrying value of PMI’s debt, excluding short-term borrowings and $33 million of finance leases, was $30,996 million at December 31,
90

2018. The fair value of PMI's outstanding debt, excluding the aforementioned short-term borrowings and finance leases, was classified
within Level 1 and Level 2 at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
The aggregate fair values of PMI’s investments in equity securities, derivative financial instruments, pension plan assets and PMI's debt
as of December 31, 2019, were as follows:

Fair Value at
December 31, 2019

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets/
Liabilities(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable Inputs(Level 2)

$

332

$

332

$

Derivative contracts

390

$

—

390

—

Pension plan assets

7,619

6,059

1,560

—

(in millions)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs(Level 3)

Assets:Equity securities (1)Total assets in fair value hierarchy$

Pension plan assets measured at net
asset value (2)Total assets

8,341

—

$

—

$

6,391

$

1,950

$

—

$

32,821

$

167

$

—

309
$

8,650

$

32,988

Liabilities:
Debt
Derivative contracts
Total liabilities

419$

33,407—$32,821

419
$

586

—
$

—

(1)

Unrealized pre-tax gain of $44 million ($35 million net of tax) on equity securities was recorded in the consolidated statement of earnings for the year
ended December 31, 2019.

(2)

In accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 820-10, certain investments measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient
have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in these tables are intended to permit reconciliation of the fairvalue hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.

91

The aggregate fair values of PMI’s investments in equity securities, derivative financial instruments, pension plan assets and PMI's debt
as of December 31, 2018 , were as follows:(in millions)

Fair Value at
December 31, 2018

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets/
Liabilities(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable Inputs(Level 2)$$$

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs(Level 3)

Assets:Equity securities

288

288

—

$

—

Derivative contracts

220

—

220

—

Pension plan assets

6,600

4,631

1,969

—

Total assets in fair value hierarchy
Pension plan assets measured at net
asset value (1)

$

7,108

Total assets

$

7,396

$

31,162

$

4,919

$

2,189

$

—

$

30,997

$

165

$

—

288

Liabilities:
Debt
Derivative contracts
Total liabilities
(1)

631
$

31,793—$30,997

631
$

796

—
$

—

In accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 820-10, certain investments measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient
have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in these tables are intended to permit reconciliation of the fairvalue hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.

Note 17.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses:
PMI's accumulated other comprehensive losses, net of taxes, consisted of the following:(Losses) Earnings

At December 31,(in millions)

Currency translation adjustments$

Pension and other benefits
Derivatives accounted for as hedges
Total accumulated other comprehensive losses

$

2019

2018

2017

(5,537) $(6,500) $(5,761)(3,829)(3,646)(2,816)335

42(9,363) $ (10,111) $(8,535)

Reclassifications from Other Comprehensive Earnings
The movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact, for each of the components above, that are due
to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement, including those related to the deconsolidation of RBH, are shownon the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017. For the year ended
2017, $2 million of net currency translation adjustment gains/(losses) were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing,administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings, respectively, upon liquidation of subsidiaries. For additional
information, see Note 13. Benefit Plans for disclosures related to PMI's pension and other benefits, Note 15. Financial Instruments fordisclosures related to derivative financial instruments and Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH for disclosures related to the deconsolidationof RBH.
92

Note 18.
Contingencies:
Tobacco-Related Litigation
Legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending or threatened against us, and/or our subsidiaries, and/or our indemnitees
in various jurisdictions. Our indemnitees include distributors, licensees, and others that have been named as parties in certain cases andthat we have agreed to defend, as well as to pay costs and some or all of judgments, if any, that may be entered against them. Pursuant
to the terms of the Distribution Agreement between Altria Group, Inc. ("Altria") and PMI, PMI will indemnify Altria and Philip Morris
USA Inc. ("PM USA"), a U.S. tobacco subsidiary of Altria, for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured
by PMI or contract manufactured for PMI by PM USA, and PM USA will indemnify PMI for tobacco product claims based in substantial
part on products manufactured by PM USA, excluding tobacco products contract manufactured for PMI.
It is possible that there could be adverse developments in pending cases against us and our subsidiaries. An unfavorable outcome orsettlement of pending tobacco-related litigation could encourage the commencement of additional litigation.
Damages claimed in some of the tobacco-related litigation are significant and, in certain cases in Brazil, Canada and Nigeria, range into
the billions of U.S. dollars. The variability in pleadings in multiple jurisdictions, together with the actual experience of management inlitigating claims, demonstrate that the monetary relief that may be specified in a lawsuit bears little relevance to the ultimate outcome.
Much of the tobacco-related litigation is in its early stages, and litigation is subject to uncertainty. However, as discussed below, we haveto date been largely successful in defending tobacco-related litigation.
We and our subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when we determine that an
unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. At the present time, except as stated otherwise
in this Note 18. Contingencies, while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur, after assessing theinformation available to it (i) management has not concluded that it is probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobaccorelated cases; (ii) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for any of the pending tobacco-related cases; and(iii) accordingly, no estimated loss has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes in these cases, ifany. Legal defense costs are expensed as incurred.
It is possible that our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position could be materially affected in a particular fiscal
quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation. Nevertheless, although litigation is subject
to uncertainty, we and each of our subsidiaries named as a defendant believe, and each has been so advised by counsel handling therespective cases, that we have valid defenses to the litigation pending against us, as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts.
All such cases are, and will continue to be, vigorously defended. However, we and our subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions
in particular cases if we believe it is in our best interests to do so.
CCAA Proceedings and Stay of Tobacco-Related Cases Pending in Canada
As a result of the Court of Appeal of Quebec’s decision in both the Létourneau and Blais cases described below, our subsidiary, Rothmans,
Benson & Hedges Inc. (“RBH”), and the other defendants, JTI Macdonald Corp., and Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, sought protectionin the Ontario Superior Court of Justice under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) on March 22, March 8, and March
12, respectively. CCAA is a Canadian federal law that permits a Canadian business to restructure its affairs while carrying on its businessin the ordinary course. The initial CCAA order made by the Ontario Superior Court on March 22, 2019 authorizes RBH to pay all expenses
incurred in carrying on its business in the ordinary course after the CCAA filing, including obligations to employees, vendors, andsuppliers. As further described in Note 22. Deconsolidation of RBH, RBH is now deconsolidated from our consolidated financial
statements. As part of the CCAA proceedings, there is currently a comprehensive stay up to and including March 12, 2020 of all tobaccorelated litigation pending in Canada against RBH and the other defendants, including PMI and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria),
namely, the smoking and health class actions filed in various Canadian provinces and health care cost recovery actions. These proceedings
are presented below under the caption “Stayed Litigation — Canada.” Ernst & Young Inc. has been appointed as monitor of RBH in the
CCAA proceedings. In accordance with the CCAA process, as the parties work towards a plan of arrangement or compromise in aconfidential mediation, it is anticipated that the court will set additional hearings and further extend the stay of proceedings. On April
17, 2019, the Ontario Superior Court ruled that RBH and the other defendants will not be allowed to file an application to the Supreme
Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision in the Létourneau and the Blais cases so long as the comprehensive
stay of all tobacco-related litigation in Canada remains in effect and that the time period to file the application would be extended by thestay period. While RBH believes that the findings of liability and damages in both Létourneau and the Blais cases were incorrect, the
CCAA proceedings will provide a forum for RBH to seek resolution through a plan of arrangement or compromise of all tobacco-related
93

litigation pending in Canada. It is not possible to predict the resolution of the underlying legal proceedings or the length of the CCAA
process.
Stayed Litigation — Canada
Smoking and Health Litigation — Canada
In the first class action pending in Canada, Conseil Québécois Sur Le Tabac Et La Santé and Jean-Yves Blais v. Imperial Tobacco Ltd.,
Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. and JTI-Macdonald Corp., Quebec Superior Court, Canada, filed in November 1998, RBH and other
Canadian manufacturers (Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. and JTI-Macdonald Corp.) are defendants. The plaintiffs, an anti-smoking
organization and an individual smoker, sought compensatory and punitive damages for each member of the class who allegedly suffersfrom certain smoking-related diseases. The class was certified in 2005. The trial court issued its judgment on May 27, 2015. The trial
court found RBH and two other Canadian manufacturers liable and found that the class members’ compensatory damages totaled
approximately CAD 15.5 billion, including pre-judgment interest (approximately $11.7 billion). The trial court awarded compensatory
damages on a joint and several liability basis, allocating 20% to our subsidiary (approximately CAD 3.1 billion, including pre-judgmentinterest (approximately $2.34 billion)). In addition, the trial court awarded CAD 90,000 (approximately $67,980) in punitive damages,
allocating CAD 30,000 (approximately $22,660) to RBH. The trial court estimated the disease class at 99,957 members. RBH appealed
to the Court of Appeal of Quebec. In October 2015, the Court of Appeal ordered RBH to furnish security totaling CAD 226 million(approximately $170.7 million) to cover both the Létourneau and Blais cases, which RBH has paid in installments through March 2017.
The Court of Appeal ordered Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. to furnish security totaling CAD 758 million (approximately $573 million)
in installments through June 2017. JTI Macdonald Corp. was not required to furnish security in accordance with plaintiffs’ motion. The
Court of Appeal ordered that the security is payable upon a final judgment of the Court of Appeal affirming the trial court’s judgment or
upon further order of the Court of Appeal. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court’s
findings of liability and the compensatory and punitive damages award while reducing the total amount of compensatory damages toapproximately CAD 13.5 billion including interest (approximately $10.2 billion) due to the trial court’s error in the calculation of interest.
The compensatory damages award is on a joint and several basis with an allocation of 20% to RBH (approximately CAD 2.7 billion,
including pre-judgment interest (approximately $2.04 billion)). The Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s findings that defendants
violated the Civil Code of Quebec, the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, and the Quebec Consumer Protection Act byfailing to warn adequately of the dangers of smoking and by conspiring to prevent consumers from learning of the dangers of smoking.
The Court of Appeal further held that the plaintiffs either need not prove, or had adequately proven, that these faults were a cause of theclass members’ injuries. In accordance with the judgment, defendants are required to deposit their respective portions of the damages
awarded in both the Létourneau case described below and the Blais case, approximately CAD 1.1 billion (approximately $831 million),
into trust accounts within 60 days. RBH’s share of the deposit is approximately CAD 257 million (approximately $194.1 million). PMI
recorded a pre-tax charge of $194 million in its consolidated results, representing $142 million net of tax, as tobacco litigation-related
expense, in the first quarter of 2019. The charge reflects PMI’s assessment of the portion of the judgment that represents probable andestimable loss prior to the deconsolidation of RBH and corresponds to the trust account deposit required by the judgment.
In the second class action pending in Canada, Cecilia Létourneau v. Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. and JTIMacdonald Corp., Quebec Superior Court, Canada, filed in September 1998, RBH and other Canadian manufacturers (Imperial Tobacco
Canada Ltd. and JTI-Macdonald Corp.) are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, sought compensatory and punitive damages
for each member of the class who is deemed addicted to smoking. The class was certified in 2005. The trial court issued its judgment on
May 27, 2015. The trial court found RBH and two other Canadian manufacturers liable and awarded a total of CAD 131 million(approximately $99 million) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 46 million (approximately $34.7 million) to RBH. The trial court
estimated the size of the addiction class at 918,000 members but declined to award compensatory damages to the addiction class because
the evidence did not establish the claims with sufficient accuracy. The trial court found that a claims process to allocate the awarded
punitive damages to individual class members would be too expensive and difficult to administer. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal
issued a decision largely affirming the trial court’s findings of liability and the total amount of punitive damages awarded allocating CAD
57 million including interest (approximately $43.1 million) to RBH. See the Blais description above and Note 22. Deconsolidation of
RBH below for further detail concerning the security order pertaining to both Létourneau and Blais cases and the impact of the decision
on PMI’s financial statements.
RBH and PMI believe the findings of liability and damages in both Létourneau and the Blais cases were incorrect and in contraventionof applicable law on several grounds including the following: (i) defendants had no obligation to warn class members who knew, or
should have known, of the risks of smoking; (ii) defendants cannot be liable to class members who would have smoked regardless ofwhat warnings were given; and (iii) defendants cannot be liable to all class members given the individual differences between classmembers.
In the third class action pending in Canada, Kunta v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Queen's Bench, Winnipeg,
Canada, filed June 12, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants.
The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (“COPD”),
94severe asthma, and mild reversible lung disease resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive
damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers, their estates, dependents and family members, as well as restitution of
profits, and reimbursement of government health care costs allegedly caused by tobacco products.
In the fourth class action pending in Canada, Adams v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Queen's Bench,
Saskatchewan, Canada, filed July 10, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are
defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and COPD resulting from the use of tobacco
products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who have smokeda minimum of 25,000 cigarettes and have allegedly suffered, or suffer, from COPD, emphysema, heart disease, or cancer, as well as
restitution of profits.
In the fifth class action pending in Canada, Semple v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Supreme Court (trial court),
Nova Scotia, Canada, filed June 18, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are
defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges his own addiction to tobacco products and COPD resulting from the use of tobacco
products. He is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers, their estates,
dependents and family members, as well as restitution of profits, and reimbursement of government health care costs allegedly caused
by tobacco products.
In the sixth class action pending in Canada, Dorion v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Queen's Bench, Alberta,
Canada, filed June 15, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants.
The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and chronic bronchitis and severe sinus infections
resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprisedof all smokers, their estates, dependents and family members, restitution of profits, and reimbursement of government health care costs
allegedly caused by tobacco products. To date, we, our subsidiaries, and our indemnitees have not been properly served with the complaint.
In the seventh class action pending in Canada, McDermid v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, et al., Supreme Court, British Columbia,
Canada, filed June 25, 2010, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants.
The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges his own addiction to tobacco products and heart disease resulting from the use of tobacco
products. He is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who were alive on
June 12, 2007, and who suffered from heart disease allegedly caused by smoking, their estates, dependents and family members, plus
disgorgement of revenues earned by the defendants from January 1, 1954, to the date the claim was filed.
In the eighth class action pending in Canada, Bourassa v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, et al., Supreme Court, British Columbia,
Canada, filed June 25, 2010, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants.
The plaintiff, the heir to a deceased smoker, alleges that the decedent was addicted to tobacco products and suffered from emphysema
resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprisedof all smokers who were alive on June 12, 2007, and who suffered from chronic respiratory diseases allegedly caused by smoking, theirestates, dependents and family members, plus disgorgement of revenues earned by the defendants from January 1, 1954, to the date theclaim was filed. In December 2014, plaintiff filed an amended statement of claim.
In the ninth class action pending in Canada, Suzanne Jacklin v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., Ontario Superior Courtof Justice, filed June 20, 2012, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants.
The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and COPD resulting from the use of tobacco products.
She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who have smoked a minimumof 25,000 cigarettes and have allegedly suffered, or suffer, from COPD, heart disease, or cancer, as well as restitution of profits.
Health Care Cost Recovery Litigation — Canada
In the first health care cost recovery case pending in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco
Limited, et al., Supreme Court, British Columbia, Vancouver Registry, Canada, filed January 24, 2001, we, RBH, our indemnitee (PMUSA), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, the government of the province of British Columbia, brought aclaim based upon legislation enacted by the province authorizing the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers
to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, resulting from a “tobacco related wrong.”
In the second health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Brunswick v. Rothmans Inc., et al.,Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick, Trial Court, New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada, filed March 13, 2008, we, RBH, ourindemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of theprovince of New Brunswick based on legislation enacted in the province. This legislation is similar to the law introduced in British
Columbia that authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has
incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”95

In the third health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario v. Rothmans Inc., et al., Ontario
Superior Court of Justice, Toronto, Canada, filed September 29, 2009, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and othermembers of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Ontario based on legislation enacted
in the province. This legislation is similar to the laws introduced in British Columbia and New Brunswick that authorize the government
to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco
related wrong.”
In the fourth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador v. Rothmans Inc., et al.,Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. Johns, Canada, filed February 8, 2011, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA andAltria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Newfoundland andLabrador based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws introduced in British Columbia, New Brunswick andOntario. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs
it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”
In the fifth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Attorney General of Quebec v. Imperial Tobacco Limited, et al., Superior Courtof Quebec, Canada, filed June 8, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitee (PM USA), and other members of the industry are defendants. The
claim was filed by the government of the province of Quebec based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws
enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers
to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”
In the sixth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty in Right of Alberta v. Altria Group, Inc., et al., Supreme Courtof Queen's Bench Alberta, Canada, filed June 8, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry
are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Alberta based on legislation enacted in the province that issimilar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against
cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”
In the seventh health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Manitoba v. Rothmans,
Benson & Hedges, Inc., et al., The Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Judicial Centre, Canada, filed May 31, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees(PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province ofManitoba based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation
authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will
incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”
In the eighth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, The Government of Saskatchewan v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., etal., Queen's Bench, Judicial Centre of Saskatchewan, Canada, filed June 8, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), andother members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Saskatchewan based on legislation
enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government
to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco
related wrong.”
In the ninth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Prince Edward Island v.
Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., et al., Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island (General Section), Canada, filed September 10, 2012,
we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the governmentof the province of Prince Edward Island based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other
Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the healthcare costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”
In the tenth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Nova Scotia v. Rothmans,
Benson & Hedges Inc., et al., Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Canada, filed January 2, 2015, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA andAltria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Nova Scotia basedon legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes
the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as aresult of a “tobacco related wrong.”__________

96

The table below lists the number of tobacco-related cases pertaining to combustible products pending against us and/or our subsidiaries
or indemnitees as of February 3, 2020, February 4, 2019 and February 9, 2018:¹
Number of Cases
Pending as ofFebruary 3, 2020
50
10
17
—
5
2

Type of Case
Individual Smoking and Health Cases
Smoking and Health Class Actions
Health Care Cost Recovery Actions
Label-Related Class Actions
Individual Label-Related Cases
Public Civil Actions

Number of Cases
Pending as ofFebruary 4, 2019
55
10
16
1
7
2

Number of Cases
Pending as ofFebruary 9, 2018
57
11
16
1
1
2

Since 1995, when the first tobacco-related litigation was filed against a PMI entity, 501 Smoking and Health, Label-Related, Health Care
Cost Recovery, and Public Civil Actions in which we and/or one of our subsidiaries and/or indemnitees were a defendant have been
terminated in our favor. Thirteen cases have had decisions in favor of plaintiffs. Nine of these cases have subsequently reached final
resolution in our favor and four remain on appeal.
The table below lists the verdict and significant post-trial developments in the four pending cases where a verdict was returned in favorof the plaintiff:

Date
February 2004

Location of
Court/Name ofPlaintiff
Brazil/The Smoker HealthDefense Association

Type of
Case
Class Action

Verdict
The Civil Court of São Paulofound defendants liablewithout hearing evidence. In
April 2004, the court awarded“moral damages” of R$1,000(approximately $233) per
smoker per full year ofsmoking plus interest at therate of 1% per month, as of thedate of the ruling. The court
did not assess actual damages,
which were to be assessed in asecond phase of the case. The
size of the class was notdefined in the ruling.

______¹ Includes cases pending in Canada.

97

Post-Trial
Developments
Defendants appealed to the São
Paulo Court of Appeals, whichannulled the ruling in November
2008, finding that the trial court had
inappropriately ruled without
hearing evidence and returned thecase to the trial court for further
proceedings. In May 2011, the trial
court dismissed the claim. In March
2017, plaintiff filed an en bancappeal to the Superior Court ofJustice. In addition, the defendants
filed a constitutional appeal to theFederal Supreme Tribunal on thebasis that plaintiff did not havestanding to bring the lawsuit. Bothappeals are still pending.

Date
May 27, 2015

Location of
Court/Name ofPlaintiff
Canada/Conseil
Québécois Sur Le Tabac
Et La Santé and JeanYves Blais

Type of
Case
Class Action

Verdict
On May 27, 2015, the Superior
Court of the District ofMontreal, Province of Quebec
ruled in favor of the Blais classon liability and found the classmembers’ compensatory
damages totaled approximately
CAD 15.5 billion(approximately $11.7 billion),including pre-judgmentinterest. The trial court
awarded compensatory
damages on a joint and several
liability basis, allocating 20%
to our subsidiary(approximately CAD 3.1
billion including pre-judgmentinterest (approximately $2.34
billion)). The trial court
awarded CAD 90,000(approximately $67,980) in
punitive damages, allocating
CAD 30,000 (approximately$22,660) to our subsidiary.
The trial court ordered
defendants to pay CAD 1
billion (approximately $755.3
million) of the compensatory
damage award, CAD 200
million (approximately $151.1
million) of which is our
subsidiary’s portion, into a
trust within 60 days.

98

Post-Trial
Developments
In June 2015, RBH commenced theappellate process with the Court ofAppeal of Quebec. On March 1,
2019, the Court of Appeal issued adecision largely affirming the trial
court's decision. (See “Stayed
Litigation — Canada” for further
detail.)Date
May 27, 2015

Date
August 5, 2016

Location of
Court/Name ofPlaintiff
Canada/Cecilia
Létourneau

Location of
Court/Name ofPlaintiff
Argentina/Hugo LespadaType of
Case
Class Action

Type of
Case
Individual
ActionVerdict
On May 27, 2015, the Superior
Court of the District ofMontreal, Province of Quebec
ruled in favor of the
Létourneau class on liability
and awarded a total of CAD
131 million (approximately$99 million) in punitive
damages, allocating CAD 46
million (approximately $34.7
million) to RBH. The trial
court ordered defendants to
pay the full punitive damage
award into a trust within 60
days. The court did not orderthe payment of compensatory
damages.

Verdict
On August 5, 2016, the Civil
Court No. 14 - Mar del Plata,
issued a verdict in favor ofplaintiff, an individual smoker,
and awarded him ARS 110,000(approximately $1,825), plus
interest, in compensatory andmoral damages. The trial court
found that our subsidiary
failed to warn plaintiff of therisk of becoming addicted tocigarettes.

Post-Trial
Developments
In June 2015, RBH commenced theappellate process with the Court ofAppeal of Quebec. On March 1,
2019, the Court of Appeal issued adecision largely affirming the trial
court's decision. (See “Stayed
Litigation — Canada” for further
detail.)Post-Trial
Developments
On August 23, 2016, our subsidiary
filed its notice of appeal. On
October 31, 2017, the Civil andCommercial Court of Appeals of
Mar del Plata ruled that plaintiff's
claim was barred by the statute oflimitations and it reversed the trial
court's decision. On November 28,
2017, plaintiff filed an
extraordinary appeal of the reversalof the trial court's decision to theSupreme Court of the Province of
Buenos Aires.

Pending claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories:
Smoking and Health Litigation: These cases primarily allege personal injury and are brought by individual plaintiffs or on behalf of aclass or purported class of individual plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various theories of recovery,
including negligence, gross negligence, strict liability, fraud, misrepresentation, design defect, failure to warn, breach of express andimplied warranties, violations of deceptive trade practice laws and consumer protection statutes. Plaintiffs in these cases seek various
forms of relief, including compensatory and other damages, and injunctive and equitable relief. Defenses raised in these cases include
licit activity, failure to state a claim, lack of defect, lack of proximate cause, assumption of the risk, contributory negligence, and statuteof limitations.
As of February 3, 2020, there were a number of smoking and health cases pending against us, our subsidiaries or indemnitees, as follows:99•

50 cases brought by individual plaintiffs in Argentina (31), Brazil (5), Canada (2), Chile (5), Costa Rica (1), Italy (1), thePhilippines (1), Poland (2), Turkey (1) and Scotland (1), compared with 55 such cases on February 4, 2019, and 57 cases on
February 9, 2018; and•10 cases brought on behalf of classes of individual plaintiffs in Brazil (1) and Canada (9), compared with 10 such cases on
February 4, 2019 and 11 such cases on February 9, 2018.

The class actions pending in Canada are described above under the caption “Smoking and Health Litigation — Canada.”
In the class action pending in Brazil, The Smoker Health Defense Association (ADESF) v. Souza Cruz, S.A. and Philip Morris Marketing,
S.A., Nineteenth Lower Civil Court of the Central Courts of the Judiciary District of São Paulo, Brazil, filed July 25, 1995, our subsidiary
and another member of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, a consumer organization, is seeking damages for all addicted smokers
and former smokers, and injunctive relief. In 2004, the trial court found defendants liable without hearing evidence and awarded “moral
damages” of R$1,000 (approximately $233) per smoker per full year of smoking plus interest at the rate of 1% per month, as of the dateof the ruling. The court did not award actual damages, which were to be assessed in the second phase of the case. The size of the classwas not estimated. Defendants appealed to the São Paulo Court of Appeals, which annulled the ruling in November 2008, finding thatthe trial court had inappropriately ruled without hearing evidence and returned the case to the trial court for further proceedings. In May
2011, the trial court dismissed the claim. In February 2015, the appellate court unanimously dismissed plaintiff's appeal. In September
2015, plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court of Justice. In February 2017, the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice denied
plaintiff's appeal. In March 2017, plaintiff filed an en banc appeal to the Superior Court of Justice. In addition, the defendants filed aconstitutional appeal to the Federal Supreme Tribunal on the basis that plaintiff did not have standing to bring the lawsuit. Both appeals
are still pending.
Health Care Cost Recovery Litigation: These cases, brought by governmental and non-governmental plaintiffs, seek reimbursement ofhealth care cost expenditures allegedly caused by tobacco products. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various
theories of recovery including unjust enrichment, negligence, negligent design, strict liability, breach of express and implied warranties,
violation of a voluntary undertaking or special duty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, conspiracy, public nuisance, defective product,
failure to warn, sale of cigarettes to minors, and claims under statutes governing competition and deceptive trade practices. Plaintiffs inthese cases seek various forms of relief including compensatory and other damages, and injunctive and equitable relief. Defenses raisedin these cases include lack of proximate cause, remoteness of injury, failure to state a claim, adequate remedy at law, “unclean
hands” (namely, that plaintiffs cannot obtain equitable relief because they participated in, and benefited from, the sale of cigarettes), andstatute of limitations.
As of February 3, 2020, there were 17 health care cost recovery cases pending against us, our subsidiaries or indemnitees in Brazil (1),Canada (10), Korea (1) and Nigeria (5), compared with 16 such cases on February 4, 2019 and 16 such cases on February 9, 2018.
The health care cost recovery actions pending in Canada are described above under the caption “Health Care Cost Recovery Litigation— Canada.”
In the health care cost recovery case in Brazil, The Attorney General of Brazil v. Souza Cruz Ltda., et al., Federal Trial Court, Porto
Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, filed May 21, 2019, we, our subsidiaries, and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff
seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past five years, payment of anticipated costs oftreating future alleged smoking-related diseases, and moral damages. Our subsidiaries were served with the complaint. A challenge tothe service of PMI as improper is pending.
In the first health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Lagos State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited,
et al., High Court of Lagos State, Lagos, Nigeria, filed March 13, 2008, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff
seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating
alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. We are in the processof making challenges to service and the court's jurisdiction. Currently, the case is stayed in the trial court pending the appeals of certain
co-defendants relating to service objections.
In the second health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Kano State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited,
et al., High Court of Kano State, Kano, Nigeria, filed May 9, 2007, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff seeks
reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating
alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. We are in the processof making challenges to service and the court's jurisdiction. Currently, the case is stayed in the trial court pending the appeals of certain
co-defendants relating to service objections.
In the third health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Gombe State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited,
et al., High Court of Gombe State, Gombe, Nigeria, filed October 17, 2008, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff
100seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating
alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. In February 2011, thecourt ruled that the plaintiff had not complied with the procedural steps necessary to serve us. As a result of this ruling, plaintiff must reserve its claim. We have not yet been re-served.
In the fourth health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Oyo State, et al., v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria)
Limited, et al., High Court of Oyo State, Ibadan, Nigeria, filed May 25, 2007, we and other members of the industry are defendants.
Plaintiffs seek reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costsof treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. We challenged
service as improper. In June 2010, the court ruled that plaintiffs did not have leave to serve the writ of summons on the defendants andthat they must re-serve the writ. We have not yet been re-served.
In the fifth health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Ogun State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited,
et al., High Court of Ogun State, Abeokuta, Nigeria, filed February 26, 2008, we and other members of the industry are defendants.
Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costsof treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. In May 2010,
the trial court rejected our service objections. We have appealed.
In the health care cost recovery case in Korea, the National Health Insurance Service v. KT&G, et. al., filed April 14, 2014, our subsidiaryand other Korean manufacturers are defendants. Plaintiff alleges that defendants concealed the health hazards of smoking, marketed toyouth, added ingredients to make their products more harmful and addictive, and misled consumers into believing that Lights cigarettes
are safer than regular cigarettes. The National Health Insurance Service seeks to recover damages allegedly incurred in treating 3,484
patients with small cell lung cancer, squamous cell lung cancer, and squamous cell laryngeal cancer from 2003 to 2012. The case is now
in the evidentiary phase.
Label-Related Cases: These cases, brought by individual plaintiffs, or on behalf of a class or purported class of individual plaintiffs,
allege that the use of the descriptor “Lights” or other alleged misrepresentations or omissions of labeling information constitute fraudulent
and misleading conduct. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various theories of recovery including
misrepresentation, deception, and breach of consumer protection laws. Plaintiffs seek various forms of relief including restitution,
injunctive relief, and compensatory and other damages. Defenses raised include lack of causation, lack of reliance, assumption of therisk, and statute of limitations.
As of February 3, 2020, there were 5 label-related cases brought by individual plaintiffs in Italy (1) and Chile (4) pending against our
subsidiaries, compared with 7 such case on February 4, 2019, and 1 such case on February 9, 2018.
An individual plaintiff filed a purported class action certification motion, Aharon Ringer v. Philip Morris Ltd. and Globrands Ltd., on
July 18, 2017, in the Central District Court of Israel. Our Israeli affiliate and an Israeli importer and distributor for other multinational
tobacco companies were defendants. Plaintiff sought to represent a class of smokers in Israel who have purchased cigarettes imported
by defendants since July 18, 2010. Plaintiff estimated the class size to be 7,000,000 smokers. Plaintiff alleged that defendants misledconsumers by not disclosing sufficient information about carbon monoxide, tar, and nicotine yields of, and tobacco contained in, theimported cigarettes. Plaintiff sought various forms of relief, including an order for defendants to label cigarette packs in accordance withplaintiff’s demands, and damages for misleading consumers, breach of autonomy and unjust enrichment. In September 2019, plaintiff
voluntarily withdrew the class certification motion, and the trial court dismissed the case with prejudice.
Public Civil Actions: Claims have been filed either by an individual, or a public or private entity, seeking to protect collective or individual
rights, such as the right to health, the right to information or the right to safety. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are basedon various theories of recovery including product defect, concealment, and misrepresentation. Plaintiffs in these cases seek various formsof relief including injunctive relief such as banning cigarettes, descriptors, smoking in certain places and advertising, as well as
implementing communication campaigns and reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by public or private institutions.
As of February 3, 2020, there were 2 public civil actions pending against our subsidiaries in Argentina (1) and Venezuela (1), comparedwith 2 such cases on February 4, 2019, and 2 such cases on February 9, 2018.
In the public civil action in Argentina, Asociación Argentina de Derecho de Danos v. Massalin Particulares S.A., et al., Civil Court of
Buenos Aires, Argentina, filed February 26, 2007, our subsidiary and another member of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, aconsumer association, seeks the establishment of a relief fund for reimbursement of medical costs associated with diseases allegedly
caused by smoking. Our subsidiary filed its answer in September 2007. In March 2010, the case file was transferred to the Federal Court
on Administrative Matters after the Civil Court granted plaintiff's request to add the national government as a co-plaintiff in the case.
The case is currently awaiting a court decision on the merits.
101

In the public civil action in Venezuela, Federation of Consumers and Users Associations (“FEVACU”), et al. v. National Assembly ofVenezuela and the Venezuelan Ministry of Health, Constitutional Chamber of the Venezuelan Supreme Court, filed April 29, 2008, wewere not named as a defendant, but the plaintiffs published a notice pursuant to court order, notifying all interested parties to appear in
the case. In January 2009, our subsidiary appeared in the case in response to this notice. The plaintiffs purport to represent the right tohealth of the citizens of Venezuela and claim that the government failed to protect adequately its citizens' right to health. The claim asks
the court to order the government to enact stricter regulations on the manufacture and sale of tobacco products. In addition, the plaintiffs
ask the court to order companies involved in the tobacco industry to allocate a percentage of their “sales or benefits” to establish a fundto pay for the health care costs of treating smoking-related diseases. In October 2008, the court ruled that plaintiffs have standing to filethe claim and that the claim meets the threshold admissibility requirements. In December 2012, the court admitted our subsidiary and
BAT's subsidiary as interested third parties. In February 2013, our subsidiary answered the complaint.
Reduced-Risk Products
In Colombia, an individual filed a purported class action, Ana Ferrero Rebolledo vs. Philip Morris Colombia S.A., et al., in April 2019against our subsidiaries with the Civil Court of Bogota related to the marketing of our Platform 1 product. Plaintiff alleges that our
subsidiaries advertise the product in contravention of law and in a manner that misleads consumers by portraying the product in a positive
light, and further asserts that the Platform 1 vapor contains many toxic compounds, creates a high level of dependence, and has damaging
second-hand effects. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and damages on her behalf and on a behalf of two classes (class 1 - all Platform 1
consumers in Colombia who seek damages for the purchase price of the product and personal injuries related to the alleged addiction,and class 2 - all residents of the neighborhood where the advertising allegedly took place who seek damages for exposure to the alleged
illegal advertising). Our subsidiaries answered the complaint in January 2020.
Other Litigation
The Department of Special Investigations of the government of Thailand ("DSI") conducted an investigation into alleged underpayment
by our subsidiary, Philip Morris (Thailand) Limited ("PM Thailand"), of customs duties and excise taxes relating to imports from thePhilippines covering the period 2003-2007. On January 18, 2016, the Public Prosecutor filed charges against our subsidiary and sevenformer and current employees in the Bangkok Criminal Court alleging that PM Thailand and the individual defendants jointly and with
the intention to defraud the Thai government, under-declared import prices of cigarettes to avoid full payment of taxes and duties inconnection with import entries of cigarettes from the Philippines during the period of July 2003 to June 2006. The government is seeking
a fine of approximately THB 80.8 billion (approximately $2.58 billion). In May 2017, Thailand enacted a new customs act. The newact, which took effect in November 2017, substantially limits the amount of fines that Thailand could seek in these proceedings. PM
Thailand believes that its declared import prices are in compliance with the Customs Valuation Agreement of the World Trade Organization
and Thai law and that the allegations of the Public Prosecutor are inconsistent with several decisions already taken by Thai Customs andother Thai governmental agencies. Trial in the case began in November 2017 and concluded in September 2019. In November 2019,
the trial court found our subsidiary guilty of under-declaration of the prices and imposed a fine of approximately THB 1.2 billion(approximately $38.4 million). The trial court dismissed all charges against the individual defendants. In December 2019, as requiredby the Thai law, our subsidiary paid the fine. This payment is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets and in cashused in operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Our subsidiary will appeal the trial court’s decision. If our
subsidiary ultimately prevails on appeal, then Thailand will be required to return this payment to our subsidiary.
The DSI also conducted an investigation into alleged underpayment by PM Thailand of customs duties and excise taxes relating to imports
from Indonesia covering the period 2000-2003. On January 26, 2017, the Public Prosecutor filed charges against PM Thailand and its
former Thai employee in the Bangkok Criminal Court alleging that PM Thailand and its former employee jointly and with the intention
to defraud the Thai government under-declared import prices of cigarettes to avoid full payment of taxes and duties in connection with
import entries during the period from January 2002 to July 2003. The government is seeking a fine of approximately THB 19.8 billion(approximately $633 million). In May 2017, Thailand enacted a new customs act. The new act, which took effect in November 2017,
substantially limits the amount of fines that Thailand could seek in these proceedings. PM Thailand believes that its declared importprices are in compliance with the Customs Valuation Agreement of the World Trade Organization and Thai law, and that the allegationsof the Public Prosecutor are inconsistent with several decisions already taken by Thai Customs and a Thai court. Trial in the case beganin November 2018 and concluded in December 2019. The case is awaiting a court decision in March 2020.
The South Korean Board of Audit and Inspection (“BAI”) conducted an audit of certain Korean government agencies and the tobacco
industry into whether inventory movements ahead of the January 1, 2015 increase of cigarette-related taxes by tobacco companies,
including Philip Morris Korea Inc. ("PM Korea"), our South Korean affiliate, were in compliance with South Korean tax laws. In
November 2016, the tax authorities completed their audit and assessed allegedly underpaid taxes and penalties. In order to avoid
nonpayment financial costs, PM Korea paid approximately KRW 272 billion (approximately $227 million), of which KRW 100 billion(approximately $83.5 million) was paid in 2016 and KRW 172 billion (approximately $143.7 million) was paid in the first quarter of
2017. These amounts are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets and in cash used in operating activities in the
consolidated statements of cash flows. PM Korea appealed the assessments. In January 2020, a trial court ruled that PM Korea did not102underpay the approximately KRW 218 billion (approximately $182 million) in taxes that were subject to its jurisdiction. The tax authorities
have appealed this decision. If the tax authorities ultimately lose, then they would be required to return the paid amounts to PM Korea.
PM Korea's appeal of approximately KRW 54 billion of alleged underpayments (approximately $45 million) is pending at another court.
The tax authorities have also referred the matter to the Public Prosecutor. On June 19, 2018, the Public Prosecutor decided not to filecriminal charges against PM Korea and/or other alleged co-offenders. The Public Prosecutor also decided not to prosecute PM Korea
and its managing director in connection with a criminal complaint against them that had been filed by the South Korean Ministry ofStrategy and Finance (“MOSF”). In the criminal complaint, the MOSF alleged that PM Korea exceeded the monthly product withdrawal
limits that the MOSF had set in its notice. In March 2019, the Supreme Prosecutor's Office dismissed both the tax authorities' and the
MOSF's appeals on the decisions of the Public Prosecutor, concluding the criminal investigations in these matters.
The Moscow Tax Inspectorate for Major Taxpayers (“MTI”) conducted an audit of AO Philip Morris Izhora (“PM Izhora”), our Russian
affiliate, for the 2015-2017 financial years. On July 26, 2019, MTI issued its initial assessment, claiming that intercompany sales ofcigarettes between PM Izhora and another Russian affiliate prior to excise tax increases and submission by PM Izhora of the maximum
retail sales price notifications for cigarettes to the tax authorities were improper under Russian tax laws and resulted in underpayment of
excise taxes and VAT. In August 2019, PM Izhora submitted its objections disagreeing with MTI’s allegations set forth in the initialassessment and MTI’s methodology for calculating the alleged underpayments. MTI accepted some of PM Izhora’s arguments and in
September 2019, issued the final tax assessment claiming an underpayment of RUB 24.3 billion (approximately $374 million), including
penalties and interest. In accordance with Russian tax laws, PM Izhora paid the entire amount of MTI’s final assessment. This amount
was neither imposed on, nor concurrent with, the specific revenue-producing transaction, nor was it collected from customers of ourRussian affiliates. PMI believes that the loss of $374 million in this matter is probable and estimable. Consequently, in the third quarterof 2019, PMI recorded a pre-tax charge of $374 million, in marketing, administration and research costs in the consolidated statementsof earnings, representing $315 million net of income tax. Under the Russian law, PM Izhora has until mid-September 2020 to challenge
the final tax assessment to the Federal Tax Service and is considering whether to pursue such challenge.
A putative shareholder class action lawsuit, In re Philip Morris International Inc. Securities Litigation, is pending in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York, purportedly on behalf of purchasers of Philip Morris International Inc. stock between
July 26, 2016 and April 18, 2018. The lawsuit names Philip Morris International Inc. and certain officers and employees as defendants
and includes allegations that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information about PMI’s
business, operations, financial condition, and prospects, related to product sales of, and alleged irregularities in clinical studies of, PMI’s
Platform 1 product. The lawsuit seeks various forms of relief, including damages. In November 2018, the court consolidated threeputative shareholder class action lawsuits with similar allegations previously filed in the Southern District of New York (namely, City ofWestland Police and Fire Retirement System v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al, Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters’ Pension Fundv. Philip Morris International Inc., et al., and Gilchrist v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al.) into these proceedings. A putative
shareholder class action lawsuit, Rubenstahl v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al., that had been previously filed in December 2017
in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff due to similar allegations inthese proceedings. On February 4, 2020, the court granted defendants’ motion in its entirety, dismissing all but one of the plaintiffs’ claims
with prejudice. The court noted that one of plaintiffs’ claims (allegations relating to four non-clinical studies of PMI’s Platform 1 product)
did not state a viable claim but allowed plaintiffs to replead that claim by March 3, 2020. We believe that this lawsuit is without merit
and, in the event that plaintiffs take further action, will continue to defend it vigorously.
We are also involved in additional litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business. While the outcomes of these proceedings are
uncertain, management does not expect that the ultimate outcomes of other litigation, including any reasonably possible losses in excess
of current accruals, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Note 19.
Balance Sheet Offsetting:
Derivative Financial Instruments
PMI uses foreign exchange contracts and interest rate contracts to mitigate its exposure to changes in exchange and interest rates fromthird-party and intercompany actual and forecasted transactions. Substantially all of PMI's derivative financial instruments are subject
to master netting arrangements, whereby the right to offset occurs in the event of default by a participating party. While these contracts
contain the enforceable right to offset through close-out netting rights, PMI elects to present them on a gross basis in the consolidatedbalance sheets. Collateral associated with these arrangements is in the form of cash and is unrestricted. See Note 15. Financial Instruments
for disclosures related to PMI's derivative financial instruments.

103

The effects of these derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities on PMI's consolidated balance sheets were as follows:(in millions)

Gross Amounts Not Offset in theConsolidated
Balance Sheet
Gross Amount Net Amounts
Gross
Offset in the Presented in the
Cash CollateralAmounts Consolidated
Consolidated
Financial
Received/
Recognized Balance Sheet Balance Sheet
Instruments
PledgedNet
AmountAt December 31, 2019
AssetsDerivative contracts
Liabilities

$

390 $

— $

390 $

(297) $

(91) $

2

Derivative contracts

$

419 $

— $

419 $

(297) $

(59) $

63

Derivative contracts
Liabilities

$

220 $

— $

220 $

(124) $

(80) $

16

Derivative contracts

$

631 $

— $

631 $

(124) $

(427) $

80

At December 31, 2018
Assets

Note 20.
Sale of Accounts Receivable:
To mitigate risk and enhance cash and liquidity management PMI sells trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions. Thesearrangements allow PMI to sell, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. The trade receivables sold are generally
short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets. PMI sells trade receivables under two types of arrangements,
servicing and non-servicing. For servicing arrangements, PMI continues to service the sold trade receivables on an administrative basis
and does not act on behalf of the unaffiliated financial institutions. When applicable, a servicing liability is recorded for the estimatedfair value of the servicing. The amounts associated with the servicing liability were not material for the years ended December 31, 2019and 2018. Under the non-servicing arrangements, PMI does not provide any administrative support or servicing after the trade receivables
have been sold to the unaffiliated financial institutions.
Cumulative trade receivables sold, including excise taxes, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, were $10.7 billion and $11.0
billion, respectively. PMI’s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognizedfrom the consolidated balance sheets, which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions. The trade receivables soldthat remained outstanding under these arrangements as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, were $0.9 billion, $1.0 billion and $1.1
billion, respectively. The net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements ofcash flows. The difference between the carrying amount of the trade receivables sold and the sum of the cash received is recorded as aloss on sale of trade receivables within marketing, administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings. For theyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 the loss on sale of trade receivables was immaterial.

Note 21.
Asset Impairment and Exit Costs:
Global Manufacturing Infrastructure Optimization
In light of declining PMI cigarette volumes resulting from lower total industry volumes and the shift to smoke-free alternatives, PMI
continues to optimize its global manufacturing infrastructure.

104

Germany
On November 4, 2019, PMI announced that, as part of its global manufacturing infrastructure optimization, its German affiliate, Philip
Morris Manufacturing GmbH ("PMMG"), reached an agreement with employee representatives to end cigarette production in its factoryin Berlin, Germany, by January 1, 2020. As a result of this agreement, during 2019, PMI recorded pre-tax asset impairment and exit
costs of $342 million in the European Union segment. This amount included pension and employee separation costs of $251 million,
which will be paid in cash, and asset impairment costs of $91 million, primarily related to machinery and equipment, which are non-cash
charges.
Other
During 2019, PMI also recorded pre-tax asset impairment and exit costs of $80 million as part of its global manufacturing infrastructure
optimization. These costs were related to a cigarette plant closure in Argentina ($15 million), Colombia ($45 million) and Pakistan ($20
million). The charges were reflected in the Latin America & Canada segment (Argentina and Colombia) and the South & Southeast Asia
segment (Pakistan).
Asset Impairment and Exit Costs by Segment
During 2019, pre-tax asset impairment and exit costs consisted of the following:(in millions)
Separation programs:
European Union
South & Southeast Asia
Latin America & Canada
Total separation programs

2019$

Asset impairment charges
European Union
South & Southeast Asia
Latin America & Canada
Total asset impairment charges
Asset impairment and exit costs

251
3
49
303
91
17
11
119
422

$

The total pre-tax asset impairment and exit costs above were included in marketing, administration and research costs on the consolidated
statements of earnings. During 2018 and 2017, PMI did not incur asset impairment and exit costs.
Movement in Exit Cost Liabilities
The movement in exit cost liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was as follows:(in millions)
Liability balance, January 1, 2019
Charges, net
Cash spent
Currency/other(a)Liability balance, December 31, 2019
(a)

$

$

—
303
(49)
(63)
191

Relates primarily to the reclassification of pension amounts.

Future cash payments for exit costs incurred to date are anticipated to be substantially paid by the end of 2021, with approximately $115
million expected to be paid in 2020.

105

Note 22.
Deconsolidation of RBH:
As discussed in Note 18. Contingencies, following the March 1, 2019, judgment of the Court of Appeal of Québec in two class action
lawsuits against PMI's Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH"), PMI recorded in its consolidated results a pretax charge of $194 million, representing $142 million net of tax, in the first quarter of 2019. This pre-tax Canadian tobacco litigationrelated expense was included in marketing, administration and research costs on PMI's consolidated statement of earnings for the year
ended December 31, 2019. The charge reflects PMI’s assessment of the portion of the judgment that represents probable and estimable
loss prior to the deconsolidation of RBH and corresponds to the trust account deposit required by the judgment. RBH’s share of thedeposit is approximately CAD 257 million.
On March 22, 2019, RBH obtained an initial order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granting it protection under the Companies’
Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA"), which is a Canadian federal law that permits a Canadian business to restructure its affairs while
carrying on its business in the ordinary course with minimal disruption to its customers, suppliers and employees.
The administration of the CCAA process, principally relating to the powers provided to the court and the court appointed monitor, removes
certain elements of control of the business from both PMI and RBH. As a result, PMI has determined that it no longer has a controlling
financial interest over RBH as defined in ASC 810 (Consolidation), and PMI deconsolidated RBH as of the date of the CCAA filing.
PMI has also determined that it does not exert "significant influence" over RBH as that term is defined in ASC 323 (Investments-Equity
Method and Joint Ventures). Therefore, as of March 22, 2019, PMI accounted for its continuing investment in RBH in accordance withASC 321 (Investments-Equity Securities) as an equity security, without readily determinable fair value.
Following the deconsolidation, the carrying value of assets and liabilities of RBH was removed from the consolidated balance sheet of
PMI, and the continuing investment in RBH was recorded at fair value at the date of deconsolidation. The total amount deconsolidated
from PMI’s balance sheet was $3,519 million, including $1,323 million of cash, $1,463 million of goodwill, $529 million of accumulated
other comprehensive earnings, primarily related to historical currency translation and $204 million of other assets and liabilities, net.
While PMI is accounting for its investment in RBH as an equity security, PMI would recognize dividends as income upon receipt.
However, while it remains under creditor protection, RBH does not anticipate paying dividends.
The fair value of PMI’s continuing investment in RBH of $3,280 million was determined at the date of deconsolidation, recorded within
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities and is assessed for impairment on an ongoing basis. The estimated fairvalue of the underlying business was determined based on an income approach using a discounted cash flow analysis, as well as a market
approach for certain contingent liabilities. The information used in the estimate includes observable inputs, primarily a discount rate of
8%, a terminal growth rate of 2.5% and information about total tobacco market size in Canada and RBH’s share of the market, as wellas unobservable inputs such as operating budgets and strategic plans, various inflation scenarios, estimated shipment volumes, andexpected product pricing and projected margins.
The difference between the carrying value of the assets and liabilities of RBH that were deconsolidated and the fair value of the continuing
investment, as determined at the date of deconsolidation, was $239 million, before tax, and this loss on deconsolidation is reflected withinmarketing, administration and research costs on PMI’s consolidated statement of earnings for the year ended December 31, 2019. PMI
also recorded a tax benefit of $49 million within the provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2019, related to thereversal of a deferred tax liability on unremitted earnings of RBH.
RBH is party to transactions with PMI and its consolidated subsidiaries entered into in the normal course of business; these transactions
include royalty payments and recharge of various corporate expenses for services benefiting RBH. Up to the date of CCAA filing, thesetransactions were eliminated on consolidation and had no impact on PMI’s consolidated statement of earnings. After deconsolidating
RBH, these transactions are treated as third-party transactions in PMI’s financial statements. The amount of these related-party transactions
is included within Note 4. Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other.
Developments in the CCAA process, including resolution through a plan of arrangement or compromise of all pending tobacco-related
litigation currently stayed in Canada, as discussed in Note 18. Contingencies, could result in a material change in the fair value of PMI’scontinuing investment in RBH.

106

Note 23.
Leases:
PMI’s operating leases are principally for real estate (office space, warehouses and retail store space) and vehicles. Lease terms range
from 1 year to 74 years, some of which include options to renew, which are reasonably certain to be renewed. Lease terms may also
include options to terminate the lease. The exercise of a lease renewal or termination option is at PMI’s discretion.
PMI’s operating leases at December 31, 2019, were as follows:(in millions)
Assets:Other assets

December 31, 2019
$

766

$

194

$

569
763

Liabilities:
Current
Accrued liabilities - Other
Noncurrent
Income taxes and other liabilities
Total lease liabilities
For information regarding PMI’s immaterial finance leases, see Note 16. Fair Value Measurements.
The components of PMI’s lease cost were as follows for the year ended December 31, 2019:(in millions)Operating lease cost

December 31, 2019
$
242
61
29
$
332

Short-term lease cost
Variable lease cost
Total lease cost

For the year ended December 31, 2019, lease cost of $79 million was recorded in cost of sales and $253 million was recorded inmarketing, administration and research cost.
Maturity of PMI’s operating lease liabilities, on an undiscounted basis, as of December 31, 2019, was as follows (as calculated
under the new guidance ASC 842 (Leases)):(in millions)

Total
$

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total lease payments
Less: Interest
Present value of lease liabilities

$

107

222
162
124
92
66
283
949
186
763

Minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases in effect at December 31, 2018, were as follows (as calculated
under legacy guidance ASC 840 (Leases)):(in millions)

Total

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023

$

147
103
73
52
43
354
772

Thereafter$
Other information related to PMI’s operating leases was as follows for the year ended December 31, 2019:(in millions)
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities in Operating cash flows
Leased assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities$$

December 31, 2019240
221

Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
Weighted-average discount rate(1)
(1)

9.6
4.4%

PMI’s weighted-average discount rate is based on its estimated pre-tax cost of debt adjusted for country-specific risk.

For further details, see Note 24. New Accounting Standards.

Note 24.
New Accounting Standards:
Recently adopted
On February 25, 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2016-02,“Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 requires organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities
for the rights and obligations created by those leases. Additionally, ASU 2016-02 modifies current guidance for lessors' accounting. ASU
2016-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. PMI
has identified its lease management system and has identified and evaluated the applicable leases. In addition to the guidance in ASU
2016-02, PMI has evaluated ASU 2018-11, which was issued in July 2018 and provides an optional transitional method. As a result of thisevaluation, PMI elected to use the optional transition method, which allows companies to use the effective date as the date of initial application
on transition and not adjust comparative period financial information or make the new required disclosures for periods prior to the effective
date. Additionally, PMI elected to use the hindsight practical expedient, as well as the package of practical expedients permitted under thetransition guidance within the new standard. Upon adoption, PMI recognized lease liabilities and the corresponding right-of-use assets (atthe present value of future payments) for predominately all of its operating leases in place at that time. At January 1, 2019, PMI's adoptionof ASU 2016-02 resulted in an increase of approximately $0.7 billion on its assets and liabilities in its statement of financial position. ASU
2016-02 did not have a material impact on its results of operations or cash flows. For further details, see Note 23. Leases.
On January 1, 2019, PMI elected to early adopt ASU 2018-15 “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal - Use Software (Subtopic 350-40):
Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.” The adoptionof ASU 2018-15 did not have a material impact on PMI's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

108

Note 25.
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):
2019 Quarters
2nd
3rd

1st

4th

(in millions, except per share data)
Net revenues

$

6,751

$

7,699

$

7,642

$

7,713

Gross profit

$

4,286

$

5,034

$

5,037

$

4,935

Net earnings attributable to PMI

$

1,354

$

2,319

$

1,896

$

1,616

Basic EPS

$

0.87

$

1.49

$

1.22

$

1.04

Diluted EPS

$

0.87

$

1.49

$

1.22

$

1.04

Dividends declared

$

1.14

$

1.14

$

1.17

$

1.17

Per share data:

2018 Quarters(in millions, except per share data)

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

Net revenues

$

6,896

$

7,726

$

7,504

$

7,499

Gross profit

$

4,281

$

4,982

$

4,886

$

4,718

Net earnings attributable to PMI

$

1,556

$

2,198

$

2,247

$

1,910

Basic EPS

$

1.00

$

1.41

$

1.44

$

1.23

Diluted EPS

$

1.00

$

1.41

$

1.44

$

1.23

Dividends declared

$

1.07

$

1.14

$

1.14

$

1.14

Per share data:

Basic and diluted EPS are computed independently for each of the periods presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly EPS amounts
may not agree to the total for the year.

109

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders ofPhilip Morris International Inc.:
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Philip Morris International Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company")
as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings, stockholders’ (deficit)
equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, including the related notes (collectively
referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting asof December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of theCompany as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,
based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control overfinancial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company's
consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due toerror or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of theconsolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures
included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits
also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenanceof records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizationsof management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection ofunauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

110Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projectionsof any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statementsthat were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that arematerial to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The
communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole,
and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on theaccounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Fair Value of Equity Investment in Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH")
As described in Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded the fair value of its continuing investment in
RBH of $3.28 billion within Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities in the consolidated balance sheets. This
investment was recorded as of March 22, 2019, which represented the fair value at the date of deconsolidation. The estimated fair valueof the underlying business was determined based on an income approach using a discounted cash flow analysis, as well as a market
approach for certain contingent liabilities. The discounted cash flow analysis and market approach include management assumptions
relevant for forecasting operating cash flows, which are subject to changes in business conditions, such as volumes, pricing, the terminal
growth rate, discount rates, inflation scenarios, and other strategic plans. The difference between the carrying value of the assets andliabilities of RBH that were deconsolidated and the fair value of the continuing investment was recorded as a $239 million pre-tax loss
on deconsolidation within marketing, administration and research costs on the Company’s consolidated statement of earnings.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the deconsolidation of RBH is a critical audit
matter are that there was significant judgment by management required when developing the fair value measurement of the continuing
investment in RBH. This led to a high degree of auditor subjectivity, judgment and effort in performing procedures and evaluating theestimated fair value of RBH which included significant assumptions related to the terminal growth rate, discount rates, inflation scenarios,and operating cash flow projections; and to evaluate management's estimate of the value of certain contingent liabilities. The audit effort
involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the audit evidence obtained from theseprocedures.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on
the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the estimated fair valueof the RBH investment, including controls over the discounted cash flow analysis and market approach, input data and key assumptions
utilized in determination of the fair value. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for determining
the fair value of the continuing investment in RBH as of the date of deconsolidation. This included evaluating the appropriateness of the
discounted cash flow analysis and market approach to value the contingent liabilities including the reasonableness of the input data andsignificant assumptions used by management in developing the fair value measurement including the terminal growth rate, discount rates,
inflation scenarios, operating cash flow projections, market size and market share data. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge
were used to assist in evaluating the Company’s discounted cash flow analysis and market approach, and evaluation of significant
assumptions, including the terminal growth rate, discount rates and inflation scenarios utilized by the Company. Evaluating whether thesignificant assumptions were reasonable involved considering (i) the past performance of the associated Canadian reporting unit, and (ii)whether they were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.
Smoking and Health and Health Care Cost Recovery Contingencies
As described in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has 77 smoking and health cases and health care cost
recovery actions pending. The Company records provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when they
determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Except as stated otherwisein Note 18, while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur, after assessing the information available, (i)management has not concluded that it is probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending smoking and health and health carecost recovery tobacco-related cases; (ii) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for any of the pending smoking
and health and health care cost recovery tobacco-related cases; and (iii) accordingly, no estimated loss has been accrued in the consolidated
financial statements for unfavorable outcomes in these cases, if any.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to smoking and health and health care cost recovery
contingencies is a critical audit matter are that there was significant judgment by management when determining the probability of a loss
being incurred and an estimate of the amount or range of the potential loss for each case, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor
111

subjectivity, judgment and effort in evaluating management’s assessment related to the loss contingencies associated with smoking andhealth and health care cost recovery related claims.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on
the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s evaluationof smoking and health and health care cost recovery litigation matters, including controls over determining the probability and range ofloss as well as financial statement disclosures. These procedures also included, among others, evaluating the completeness of theCompany’s description of smoking and health and health care cost recovery contingencies, obtaining and evaluating the letters of audit
inquiry with external and internal legal counsel, evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assessment regarding whether anunfavorable outcome is reasonably possible or probable and reasonably estimable, and evaluating the sufficiency of the Company’s
smoking and health and health care cost recovery contingencies disclosures.

/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS SA
PricewaterhouseCoopers SA/S/ CHAD MUELLER
Chad Mueller/S/ CLAUDIA BENZClaudia Benz

Lausanne, Switzerland
February 7, 2020
PricewaterhouseCoopers SA has served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.

112

Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of Philip Morris International Inc. (“PMI”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control overfinancial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. PMI’s internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the UnitedStates of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes those written policies and procedures that:•pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of PMI;•

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements inaccordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America;•

provide reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of PMI are being made only in accordance with the authorizationof management and directors of PMI; and•provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assetsthat could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting includes the controls themselves, monitoring and internal auditing practices and actions taken
to correct deficiencies as identified.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projectionsof any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of PMI’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. Management based
this assessment on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control — Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included anevaluation of the design of PMI’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control
over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of December 31, 2019, PMI maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting.
PricewaterhouseCoopers SA, an independent registered public accounting firm, who audited and reported on the consolidated financial
statements of PMI included in this report, has audited the effectiveness of PMI’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2019, as stated in their report herein.
February 7, 2020

113

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures.

PMI carried out an evaluation, with the participation of PMI’s management, including PMI’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of PMI’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, PMI’s Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that PMI’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in PMI’s
internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely tomaterially affect, PMI’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm are included in Item 8.

Item 9B.

Other Information.

None.

PART III
Except for the information relating to the executive officers set forth in Item 10 and the information relating to equity compensation plansset forth in Item 12, the information called for by Items 10-14 is hereby incorporated by reference to PMI’s definitive proxy statement
for use in connection with its annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 6, 2020, that will be filed with the SEC on or about
March 26, 2020 (the “proxy statement”), and, except as indicated therein, made a part hereof.

114

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Information About Our Executive Officers as of February 6, 2020:
Name
André Calantzopoulos
Massimo Andolina
Drago Azinovic
Werner BarthCharles BendottiFrank de Rooij
Frederic de Wilde
Marc S. Firestone
Stacey Kennedy
Martin G. King
Michael Kunst
Andreas Kurali
Bin Li
Marco Mariotti
Mario Masseroli
Deepak Mishra
John O'Mullane
Jacek Olczak
Paul Riley
Marian Salzman
Jaime Suarez
Michael Voegele
Stefano Volpetti
Jerry E. Whitson
Miroslaw Zielinski

OfficeAge

Chief Executive Officer
Senior Vice President, Operations
President, Middle East & Africa Region and PMI Duty Free
Senior Vice President, Commercial
Senior Vice President, People and Culture
Vice President, Treasury and Corporate FinancePresident, European Union Region
President, External Affairs and General Counsel
President, South and Southeast Asia Region
Chief Financial Officer
Senior Vice President, Commercial Transformation
Vice President and Controller

62
51
57
55
47
54
52
60
47
55
51
54

Chief Product Officer
President, Eastern Europe Region
President, Latin America & Canada Region
Chief Strategy Officer
Chief Life Sciences Officer
Chief Operating Officer
President, East Asia and Australia Region
Senior Vice President, Global Communications
Chief Digital Officer
Chief Technology Officer
Chief Consumer Officer
Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Chief New Ventures Officer

48
55
49
48
66
55
54
61
46
47
48
64
58

All of the above-mentioned officers, except Ms. Salzman, Mr. Mishra, Mr. Kunst, Mr. Voegele, Mr. O'Mullane, Mr. Volpetti and Mr. Li,
have been employed by us in various capacities during the past five years.
Before joining Philip Morris International Inc. in April 2018, Ms. Salzman headed Havas PR North America, where she had served as
Chief Executive Officer from 2011.
Before joining Philip Morris International Inc. in September 2018, Mr. Mishra was Managing Director, Portfolio Operations at
Centerbridge Partners, a private equity firm, from 2014, where he led commercial, operational and digital transformation in various
business sectors. From 2001 to 2014, Mr. Mishra was Partner and part of the Consumer Goods, Retail and Operations leadership teamof McKinsey & Co, where he supported clients in their transformation projects.
Before joining Philip Morris International Inc. in January 2019, Mr. Kunst was Partner at Bain & Company from 2009, most recently
working with us on our transformation projects.
Before joining Philip Morris International Inc. in February 2019, Mr. Voegele had served in various senior capacities at Adidas Group
from 2011, most recently, as Global CIO and part of the core leadership team at Adidas Group.
Before joining Philip Morris International Inc. in May 2019, Mr. O'Mullane was Global Head SVP Innovation and Development for
Consumer Health at Bayer AG from 2014.

115

Before joining Philip Morris International Inc. in June 2019, Mr. Volpetti served in various executive capacities at the Procter & Gamble
Company from 1996, most recently, as Vice President of a global business unit. He also served as Chief Marketing Officer at Luxottica
Group S.p.A. in 2015.
Before joining Philip Morris International Inc. in August 2019, Mr. Li served in various executive capacities at Harman International, asubsidiary of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., from 2010, most recently, as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Audio
Product Development and Operations.
Codes of Conduct and Corporate Governance
We have adopted the Philip Morris International Code of Conduct, which complies with requirements set forth in Item 406 of Regulation SK. This Code of Conduct applies to all of our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. We have also adopted a code of business conduct and ethics
that applies to the members of our Board of Directors. These documents are available free of charge on our website at www.pmi.com.
In addition, we have adopted corporate governance guidelines and charters for our Audit, Finance, Compensation and Leadership
Development, Product Innovation and Regulatory Affairs and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees of the Board of
Directors. All of these documents are available free of charge on our website at www.pmi.com. Any waiver granted by Philip MorrisInternational Inc. to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer or controller or any person performing similar functions
under the Code of Conduct, or certain amendments to the Code of Conduct, will be disclosed on our website at www.pmi.com.
The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this Report or incorporated into any other filings madewith the SEC.
Also refer to Board Operations and Governance—Committees of the Board, Election of Directors—Process for Nominating Directors
and Election of Directors—Director Nominees and Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports sections of the proxy statement.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation.

Refer to Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Compensation of Directors sections of the proxy statement.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters.

The number of shares to be issued upon exercise or vesting and the number of shares remaining available for future issuance under PMI’sequity compensation plans at December 31, 2019, were as follows:

Number of Securities
to be Issued upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options and Vesting of
RSUs and PSUs(a)

Equity compensation plansapproved by stockholders

Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options(b)6,289,960 (1)$—Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans(excluding Securities
reflected in column (a))(c)

21,081,444(1)Represents 3,725,870 shares of common stock that may be issued upon vesting of the restricted share units and 2,564,090 sharesthat may be issued upon vesting of the performance share units if maximum performance targets are achieved for each performancecycle. PMI has not granted options since the spin-off from Altria on March 28, 2008.
Also refer to Stock Ownership Information—Ownership of Equity Securities section of the proxy statement.

116

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Refer to Related Person Transactions and Code of Conduct and Election of Directors—Independence of Nominees sections of theproxy statement.

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Refer to Audit Committee Matters section of the proxy statement.

117

PART IV
Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules
Page
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings for the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

53
54
55 - 56
57 - 58
59
60 - 109
110 - 112
113

Schedules have been omitted either because such schedules are not required or are not applicable.
(b) The following exhibits are filed as part of this Report:
2.1—

Distribution Agreement between Altria Group, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc. dated
January 30, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registration Statement on Form
10 filed February 7, 2008).
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Philip Morris International Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed February 7, 2008).

3.1

—

3.2

—

Amended and Restated By-Laws of Philip Morris International Inc., effective as of March 7, 2019
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 7, 2019).

4.1

—

4.2

—

4.3
4.4

—
—

Specimen Stock Certificate of Philip Morris International Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed February 7, 2008).
Indenture dated as of April 25, 2008, between Philip Morris International Inc. and HSBC Bank
USA, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-3, dated April 25, 2008).
Description of Common Stock.
Description of Debt Securities.

4.6—

The Registrant agrees to furnish copies of any instruments defining the rights of holders of longterm debt of the Registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries that does not exceed 10 percent of thetotal assets of the Registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries to the Commission upon request.

10.1

—

10.2

—

Employee Matters Agreement between Altria Group, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc.,
dated as of March 28, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K filed March 31, 2008).
Intellectual Property Agreement between Philip Morris International Inc. and Philip Morris USA
Inc., dated as of January 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration
Statement on Form 10 filed March 5, 2008).

118

10.3

—

Credit Agreement relating to a US$3,500,000,000 Revolving Credit Facility (including a US
$800,000,000 swingline option) dated as of October 25, 2011, among Philip Morris International
Inc. and the Initial Lenders named therein and Citibank International plc, as Facility Agent, andCitibank, N.A., as Swingline Agent, and Citigroup Global Markets Limited, Barclays Capital, BNP
Paribas, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman Sachs
International, HSBC Bank PLC, J.P. Morgan Limited, RBS Securities Inc. and Société Générale as
Mandated Lead Arrangers and Bookrunners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to theCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed October 26, 2011).

10.4

__

Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 31, 2012, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 25,
2011, among Philip Morris International Inc., the lenders named therein and Citibank Internationalplc, as Facility Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012).

10.5

__

Credit Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2013, among Philip Morris International Inc., thelenders named therein and Citibank Europe PLC, UK Branch (formerly, The Royal Bank of
Scotland plc), as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed February 15, 2013).

10.6

__

Extension Agreement, effective February 7, 2017, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February
12, 2013, among Philip Morris International Inc., the lenders party thereto, Citibank Europe PLC,
UK Branch (formerly, Citibank International Limited), as administrative agent (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 30, 2017).

10.7

__

Extension Agreement, effective January 31, 2014, to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 12,2013, among Philip Morris International Inc., the lenders party thereto and Citibank Europe PLC,
UK Branch (formerly, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc), as Administrative Agent (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2014).

10.8__

Credit Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2014, among Philip Morris International Inc., thelenders named therein, J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, as Facility Agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., as Swingline Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form
8-K filed March 3, 2014).

10.9

__

Extension Agreement, effective as of February 10, 2015, to Credit Agreement dated as of February
12, 2013, among Philip Morris International Inc., the lenders named therein and Citibank Europe
PLC, UK Branch (formerly, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc), as Administrative Agent(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 29,2015).

10.10__

Extension Agreement, effective as of February 28, 2015, to the Credit Agreement, dated as ofFebruary 28, 2014, among Philip Morris International Inc., the lenders named therein, J.P. Morgan
Europe Limited, as Facility Agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Swingline Agent(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 29,2015).

10.11__

Amendment No. 1, dated as of July 20, 2015, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 12,2013, among Philip Morris International Inc., the lenders named therein, The Royal Bank of
Scotland plc, as resigning administrative agent, and Citibank Europe PLC, UK Branch (formerly,
Citibank International Limited), as successor administrative agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.52 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).

10.12

—

Credit Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2015, among Philip Morris International Inc., the lenders
named therein, Citibank Europe PLC, UK Branch (formerly, Citibank International Limited), as
Facility Agent, and Citibank, N.A., as Swingline Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 5, 2015).

10.13

—

Amendment No. 2, effective as of February 9, 2016, to the Credit Agreement dated as of February
12, 2013, with the lenders named therein and Citibank Europe PLC, UK Branch (formerly,
Citibank International Limited), as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2016).

11910.14—

Extension Agreement, effective as of February 28, 2016, to the Credit Agreement, dated as ofFebruary 28, 2014, among Philip Morris International Inc., each lender named therein, J.P. Morgan
Europe Limited, as facility agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as swingline agent(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28,2016).

10.15—

Extension Agreement, effective as of October 1, 2016, to the Credit Agreement dated as of October
1, 2015, among Philip Morris International Inc., lenders named therein, Citibank Europe PLC, UK
Branch (formerly, Citibank International Limited), as facility agent, and Citibank, N.A., asswingline agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
August 31, 2016).

10.16

—

Extension Agreement, effective as of October 1, 2017, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of
October 1, 2015, among Philip Morris International Inc., the lenders party thereto and Citibank
Europe PLC, UK Branch (formerly, Citibank International Limited), as facility agent, and Citibank
N.A., as swingline agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form
8-K filed August 29, 2017).

10.17

—

Extension Agreement, effective as of February 6, 2018, to the Credit Agreement, dated as ofFebruary 12, 2013, among Philip Morris International Inc., the lenders named therein, Citibank
Europe PLC, UK Branch (formerly, Citibank International Limited), as administrative agent(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 29,2018).

10.18—

Extension Agreement, effective as of February 5, 2019, to the Credit Agreement dated as ofFebruary 12, 2013, among Philip Morris International Inc., the lenders named therein, Citibank
Europe PLC, UK Branch (formerly, Citibank International Limited), as administrative agent(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 29,2019).

10.19—

Philip Morris International Inc. Automobile Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to theRegistration Statement on Form 10 filed February 7, 2008).*

10.20

—

Philip Morris International Inc. Amended and Restated Automobile Policy, dated as of October 1,
2019.*

10.21—

Philip Morris International Benefit Equalization Plan, amended and restated (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2019).*

10.22—

Philip Morris International Inc. 2012 Performance Incentive Plan, effective May 9, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 30,2012).*

10.23—

Philip Morris International Inc. 2017 Performance Incentive Plan, effective May 3, 2017
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to the Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 23,2017).*

10.24

—

10.25

—

Pension Fund of Philip Morris in Switzerland (IC) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015).*
Summary of Supplemental Pension Plan of Philip Morris in Switzerland (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015).*

10.26

—

10.27

—

10.28

—

10.29

—

Form of Restated Employee Grantor Trust Enrollment Agreement (Executive Trust Arrangement)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed
February 7, 2008).*
Form of Restated Employee Grantor Trust Enrollment Agreement (Secular Trust Arrangement)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed
February 7, 2008).*
Philip Morris International Inc. 2017 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (asamended and restated as of January 1, 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017).*
Philip Morris International Inc. 2008 Deferred Fee Plan for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed February 7, 2008).*120

10.30—

Supplemental Letter to the Employment Agreement (as amended) with André Calantzopoulos(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2017). The Employment Agreement was previously filed as Exhibit 10.22 to theRegistration Statement on Form 10 filed February 7, 2008 and is incorporated by reference to thisExhibit 10.30. The Amendment to the Employment Agreement was previously filed as Exhibit 10.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed June 13, 2013, and is incorporated by reference to thisExhibit 10.30.*

10.31

—

10.32

—

10.33

—

Supplemental Letter to Employment Agreement with Marc S. Firestone (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017). The
Employment Agreement was previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and is incorporated by reference to this Exhibit 10.31. The
Amendment to the Employment Agreement was previously filed as Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, and is incorporated by reference tothis Exhibit 10.31.*
Employment Agreement,with Martin G. King, as of January 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.30 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017).*
Supplemental Letter to the Employment Agreement (as amended) with Jacek Olczak (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2019. The Employment Agreement was previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, and is incorporated by reference to this Exhibit
10.33. The Amendment to the Employment Agreement was previously filed as Exhibit 10.33 to theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and is incorporated byreference to this Exhibit 10.33.*

10.34

—

Supplemental Letter to the Employment Agreement (as amended) with Miroslaw Zielinski(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2019). The Employment Agreement was previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and is incorporated byreference to this Exhibit 10.34. The Amendment to the Employment Agreement was previously
filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013
and is incorporated by reference to this Exhibit 10.34.*

10.35

—

Time Sharing Agreement between PMI Global Services Inc. and Louis C. Camilleri dated August
18, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed August19, 2010).*

10.36

—

Time Sharing Agreement between PMI Global Services Inc. and André Calantzopoulos, dated May
8, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2013).*

10.37

—

Amendment No. 1 to the Time Sharing Agreement between PMI Global Services Inc. and André
Calantzopoulos, dated December 23, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).*

10.38

—

Termination of the Time Sharing Agreement between PMI Global Services Inc. and André
Calantzopoulos, dated November 12, 2019.*

10.39

—

Agreement with Louis C. Camilleri (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registration
Statement on Form 10 filed February 7, 2008).*

10.40

—

Amended and Restated Supplemental Management Employees’ Retirement Plan (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2008).*

10.41—

Supplemental Equalization Plan, amended and restated as of June 29, 2015 (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2015).*

10.42—

Form of Supplemental Equalization Plan Employee Grantor Trust Enrollment Agreement (Secular
Trust) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008).*

121

*

10.43

—

Form of Supplemental Equalization Plan Employee Grantor Trust Enrollment Agreement(Executive Trust) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008).*
Philip Morris International Inc. Form of Indemnification Agreement with Directors and Executive
Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
September 18, 2009).*

10.44

—

10.45

—

Form of Deferred Stock Agreement (2015 Grants) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to theCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed February 10, 2015).*

10.46

—

Philip Morris International Inc. Tax Return Preparation Services Policy (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.51 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).*

10.47

—

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2017 Grants) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 7, 2017).*

10.48

—

10.49

—

Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (2017 Grants) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 7, 2017).*
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2018 Grants) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 13, 2018).*

10.50

—

Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (2018 Grants) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 13, 2018).*

10.51

—

10.52

—

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2019 Grants) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 12, 2019).*
Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (2019 Grants) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 12, 2019).*

21
23
24
31.1

—
—
—
—

31.2

—

32.1

—

32.2

—

101.INS—

101.SCH—

Subsidiaries of Philip Morris International Inc.
Consent of independent registered public accounting firm.
Powers of attorney.
Certification of the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
Certification of the Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
Certification of the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because
its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

101.CAL
101.DEF
101.LAB
101.PRE
104

—
—
—
—
—

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which directors or executive officers are eligible toparticipate.

122

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused thisreport to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC.
By:/s/ ANDRÉ CALANTZOPOULOS(André Calantzopoulos
Chief Executive Officer)

Date: February 7, 2020
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:
Signature/s/ ANDRÉ CALANTZOPOULOS

Title

Date

Chief Executive Officer

February 7, 2020

Chief Financial Officer

February 7, 2020

Vice President and Controller

February 7, 2020

(André Calantzopoulos)/s/

MARTIN G. KING(Martin G. King)/s/ ANDREAS KURALI(Andreas Kurali)

Directors*LOUIS C. CAMILLERI,MASSIMO FERRAGAMO,WERNER GEISSLER,LISA A. HOOK,JENNIFER LI,
JUN MAKIHARA,
KALPANA MORPARIA,
LUCIO A. NOTO,FREDERIK PAULSEN,
ROBERT B. POLET,
STEPHEN M. WOLF

*By:/s/ ANDRÉ CALANTZOPOULOS(André Calantzopoulos
Attorney-in-fact)

February 7, 2020

123

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
Reconciliation of Reported Diluted EPS to Adjusted Diluted EPS and Adjusted Diluted EPS, excluding Currency
For the Years Ended December 31, (Unaudited)

2019

Reported Diluted EPS

$

2018
4.61

$

% Change
5.08(9.3)%

Adjustments:
Asset impairment and exit costs

0.23

—

Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense

0.09

—

Loss on deconsolidation of RBH

0.12

—

Russia excise and VAT audit charge

0.20

—

Fair value adjustment for equity security investments(0.02)—Tax items(0.04)

Adjusted Diluted EPS

$

5.19

0.02
$

5.10

1.8 %

$

5.10

4.3 %

Less:
Currency(0.13)

Adjusted Diluted EPS, excluding Currency

$

5.32

Net Revenues by Product Category & Adjustments of Net Revenues for the Impact of Currency and Acquisitions
For the Years Ended December 31,(in millions)(Unaudited)

2019

Net
Revenues

Less
Currency

Net
Revenues
excludingCurrency$ 24,218$

5,587$ 29,805(831) $ 25,049
(106)

$

2018

Less
Acquisitions

Net
Revenues
excludingCurrency &Acquisitions

$

$

5,693

(937) $ 30,742

—
—

$

—

$

% Change in Net Revenues

Net
Revenues

ExcludingExcluding Currency &Total Currency Acquisitions

25,049Combustible Products$ 25,529(5.1)%(1.9)%(1.9)%

5,693

Reduced-Risk Products

4,096

36.4 %

39.0 %

39.0 %

30,742

Total PMI

$ 29,625

0.6 %

3.8 %

3.8 %

R-1

Adjustments for the Impact of RBH, excluding Currency
For the Years Ended December 31, (in millions, except per share data) (Unaudited)
Net Revenues

2019$

29,805$Net Revenues attributable to RBH
Net Revenues

29,805

Less: Currency%
Change2018
29,625

0.6 %

(742)

(1)

28,883

(2)

3.2 %

(2)

6.4 %

(937)

Net Revenues, ex. currency$

30,742$

28,883Operating Income$

10,531$

11,377(7.4)%Less:
Asset impairment and exit costs

(422)

—

Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense

(194)

—

Loss on deconsolidation of RBH

(239)

—

Russia excise and VAT audit charge(374)

Adjusted Operating Income$—

11,760$Operating Income attributable to RBH
Adjusted Operating Income

11,760Less: Currency

11,377

3.4 %

(542)

(1)

10,835(2)

8.5 %

10,835(2)

11.2 %

38.4%

(4)

1.1

(293)

Adjusted Operating Income, ex. currency$

Adjusted Operating Income Margin

12,053
39.5%

$
(3)

Adjusted Operating Income Margin attributable to RBH
Adjusted Operating Income Margin

39.5%

Less: Currency

0.3

Adjusted Operating Income Margin, ex. currency

39.2%

Adjusted Diluted EPS (5)

$

5.19

$

$

Less: Currency

5.19

37.5%

(2)

2.0

37.5%

(2)

1.7

5.10

1.8 %

(0.26)

(1)

$

4.84

(2)

7.2 %

(2)

9.9 %

Net earnings attributable to RBH
Adjusted Diluted EPS

(0.9)

(1)

(0.13)

Adjusted Diluted EPS, ex. currency

$

5.32

$

4.84

Net cash provided by operating activities(6)$10,090

$

9,478
(366)

$

9,112

(2)

10.7 %

$

9,112

(2)

21.4 %Net cash provided by operating activities attributable to RBH
Net cash provided by operating activities(6)$Less: Currency

10,090

6.5 %
(1)

(972)

Net cash provided by operating activities, excluding currency$

11,062(1) Represents the impact attributable to RBH from March 22, 2018 through end of period date(2) Pro forma(3) 2019 Adjusted Operating Income Margin was 39.5%, calculated as 2019 Adjusted Operating Income of $11,760 divided by 2019 Net Revenues of $29,805(4) 2018 Adjusted Operating Income Margin was 38.4%, calculated as 2018 Adjusted Operating Income of $11,377 divided by 2018 Net Revenues of $29,625(5) For the calculation, see "Reconciliation of Reported Diluted EPS to Adjusted Diluted EPS and Adjusted Diluted EPS, excluding Currency" in this section(6) Operating cash flow
Note: Financials attributable to RBH include Duty Free sales in Canada

R-2

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Shareholder Information
Mailing Addresses
Headquarters

Philip Morris International Inc.
120 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017-5579
USA
www.pmi.com

Operations Center

Philip Morris Products S.A.
Avenue de Rhodanie 50
1007 Lausanne
Switzerland
www.pmi.com

Independent Auditors

PricewaterhouseCoopers SA
Avenue C.F. Ramuz 451001 Lausanne
Switzerland

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 505005
Louisville, KY 40233-5005
USA2020 Virtual Annual
Meeting of Shareholders

The Philip Morris International Inc.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders will beheld solely online via a live webcast on
Wednesday, May 6, 2020, at 9:00 a.m.
Eastern Daylight Time.
For further information, call toll-free:
1-866-713-8075

Shareholder Publications

Philip Morris International Inc. makes avariety of publications and reports available.
These include the Annual Report, news
releases and other publications. For copies,
please visit: www.pmi.com/investors
Philip Morris International Inc. makes
available free of charge its filings (including
proxy statements and Reports on Forms
10-K, 10-Q and 8-K) with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission. For copies,
please visit: www.pmi.com/SECfilings
If you do not have Internet access, you may
call our Shareholder Publications Center
toll-free: 1-866-713-8075

Shareholder Response Center

Computershare Trust Company, N.A., ourtransfer agent, will answer questions about
your accounts, certificates, dividends or
the Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend
Reinvestment Plan. U.S. and Canadianshareholders may call toll-free:
1-877-745-9350
From outside the U.S. or Canada,
shareholders may call:
1-781-575-4310
Postal address:
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 505005
Louisville, KY 40233-5005
USAE-mail address:
pmi@computershare.com

Direct Stock Purchase andDividend Reinvestment Plan

Philip Morris International Inc. offers a Direct
Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment
Plan, administered by Computershare. For
more information, or to purchase shares directly
through the Plan, please contact Computershare.

Trademarks

Trademarks and service marks in this report
are the registered property of, or licensed by,
the subsidiaries of Philip Morris International Inc.
and are italicized or shown in their logo form.

Stock Exchange Listings

Philip Morris International Inc. is listed on
the New York Stock Exchange (ticker symbol“PM”) and on the SIX Swiss Exchange (ticker
symbol “PMI”).

Internet Access Helps Reduce Costs

As a convenience to shareholders and an
important cost-reduction measure, you
can register to receive future shareholder
materials (i.e., Annual Report and proxystatement) via the Internet. Shareholders
also can vote their proxies via the Internet.
For complete instructions, please visit:www.pmi.com/investors
To eliminate duplicate mailings, please contact
Computershare (if you are a registeredshareholder) or your broker (if you holdyour stock through a brokerage firm).

Additional Information

Information on our websites is not, and shall not be
deemed to be, a part of this report or incorporated
into any filings we make with the SEC.

Design: RWI www.rwidesign.com
Photography: Vickers & Beechler
Printer: Phoenix Lithographing, USA© Copyright 2020 Philip Morris International Inc.

Philip Morris International Inc.
120 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017-5579
USA
www.pmi.com

Philip Morris International: Delivering a Smoke-Free Future
Philip Morris International (PMI) is leading a transformation in the tobacco industry to create a smoke-free future andultimately replace cigarettes with smoke-free products to the benefit of adults who would otherwise continue to smoke,society, the company and its shareholders. PMI is a leading international tobacco company engaged in the manufacture andsale of cigarettes, as well as smoke-free products and associated electronic devices and accessories, and other nicotinecontaining products in markets outside the United States. In addition, PMI ships a version of its IQOS Platform 1 device andits consumables authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to Altria Group, Inc. for sale in the United States
under license. PMI is building a future on a new category of smoke-free products that, while not risk-free, are a much better
choice than continuing to smoke. Through multidisciplinary capabilities in product development, state-of-the-art facilities
and scientific substantiation, PMI aims to ensure that its smoke-free products meet adult consumer preferences and rigorous
regulatory requirements. PMI’s smoke-free IQOS product portfolio includes heat-not-burn and nicotine-containing vapor
products. As of December 31, 2019, PMI estimates that approximately 9.7 million adult smokers around the world have alreadystopped smoking and switched to PMI’s heat-not-burn product, available for sale in 52 markets in key cities or nationwide
under the IQOS brand. For more information, please visit www.pmi.com and www.pmiscience.com.