Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 46 No. 2 (June. 2009)
48Regenerative Heat Treatment Technology forOn-site Life Extension of High-energy Pipe Welds
Degraded by Creep Damage

FUMITOSHI SAKATA

MASASHI OZAKINOBUHIKO NISHIMURAAKIRA SHIIBASHIMASAHIRO KOBAYASHIThe development of thermal power plant maintenance techniques that satisfy theconflicting requirements of improved availability and reduced maintenance cost has become ahigh priority in recent years. In one approach to this problem, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.,(MHI) and Tokyo Electric Power Company have worked together to develop an emergency
technique to extend the life of high-energy pipe welds in low-alloy steel degraded due to creep
damage. This technique uses on-site induction heating and does not require replacement of theaffected pipes. This report presents examples to show that the crack initiation life of main steam
pipe elbows removed from the boiler of an actual plant can be extended by 130,000 hr.

|1. Introduction
The efficient operation of thermal power plants requires a well-balanced maintenanceprogram that can improve the plant operational availability while reducing maintenance costs.
Ideally, this would include a method of safely extending the life of parts rather than replacing themduring shutdowns. There has been strong demand in recent years for the method because
high-energy pipes have a long procurement lead time for materials. MHI and Tokyo Electric Power
Company have developed an induction heating technique for extending the life of high-energy pipe
welds in low-alloy steel degraded due to creep damage.

|2. Examples of creep damage to high-energy pipe welds
Figure 1 shows the number of Japanese commercial thermal power plants with a capacity ofat least 75 MW and their operational ages1 as of March 2005. Many units have been in operationfor 35–40 years, and more than 60% of the plants have been in operation for at least 30 years. The
time-dependent damage in a thermal power plant, and creep damage in particular, become
significant as the operational age of the plant increases; this requires effective countermeasures.
Among the different types of creep damage, damage to high-energy pipe welds is particularly
critical because the replacement material has a long procurement lead time, and heavy damage
results if leaks do occur.

Figure 1 Number of Japanese commercial thermal power plants
with a capacity of at least 75 MW and their operational ages,
as of March 2005

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 46 No. 2 (June. 2009)49

Figure 2 shows that there have been several leakage accidents due to creep damage in U.S.
thermal power plants since 1985. In these accidents, cracks generated in the heat-affected zones oflongitudinal welds propagated and finally penetrated, causing leakage.
High-temperature reheat steam pipe of Mohave
Unit 2 in the U.S. (accident in 1985)

Main steam pipe of Mount
Storm Unit 1 in the U.S.
(accident in 1992)

Figure 2 Examples of accidents involving high-energy pipe welds in the U.S.

|3. Creep damage in high-energy pipe welds
Figure 3 shows the progress of creep damage in welds. Cavities are first generated in grainboundaries of the heat-affected zone of the weld due to aging during use. When the number ofthese cavities increases, the cavities combine to become microcracks with a length almost
equivalent to that of a grain boundary. As the number of microcracks increases, the microcracks
combine and connect to become cracks. These cracks propagate and cause penetration.
It has been experimentally verified that in case of thick-walled pipe, such as a main steam
pipe, the life of the inside of the pipe in the direction of the wall thickness is shorter than that of theexternal surface due to the effect of multiaxial stress condition, and, as a result, cracks tend to begenerated inside the wall thickness earlier than on the external surface2, 3.
Based on this phenomenon, a nondestructive evaluation method focusing on the number ofcavities and structural changes was used to calculate the life consumption ratio of the external pipe
surface. This was applied in conjunction with high-precision ultrasonic testing (time of flightdiffraction and phased array) to detect cracks generated inside the pipe in the direction of the wall
thickness for maintenance of the affected locations4. However, this is only one type of preventive
maintenance that can be used to predict the pipe life before cracks occur. The creep cavity number
density method is another nondestructive evaluation method for the external pipe surface.
Determining the number of cavities in a unit area (i.e., creep cavity number density) is the key tothis method.

Figure 3 Progress of creep damage in welds

Figure 4 shows the relationship between the life consumption ratio and the creep cavity
number density due to creep damage. It is clear that the creep cavity number density increases as
the life consumption ratio increases due to progress of creep damage. The key to the regenerative
heat treatment is to extend the life of the degraded material by reducing the creep cavity number
density instead of simply observing that the creep cavity number density increases as thedeterioration advances due to the progress of creep damage.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 46 No. 2 (June. 2009)50

Figure 4 Relationship between the life consumption ratio due to creep damage andcreep cavity number density|4. Principle and application
Figure 5 shows the principle of the regenerative heat treatment, which takes place in twosteps. The first step is cavity compression to reduce the number of cavities by applying
compressive force while heating to a temperature not lower than the A3 transformation point. The
next step is re-crystallization heat treatment to adjust the structure to the base material by means ofheat treatment at a temperature around the A3 transformation point. This also encloses existing
cavities on grain boundaries into grains.

Figure 5 Regenerative heat treatment principle

The mechanical force for the compression treatment of cavities requires very large-scaleequipment for high-energy pipes, such as main steam pipes and high-temperature reheated steam
pipes. This is not realistic given the cost and space this would require. Therefore, we used thethermal stress generated by induction heating to apply the required compressive force to thecavities. In induction heating, an induced current is generated in the pipe with a magnetic field
generated by current flowing in a heating coil. The heating is due to Joule heat.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 46 No. 2 (June. 2009)51

The processing conditions for the compression treatment of cavities and re-crystallization
heat treatment were selected based on the results of various tests on elbows removed from theboiler of an actual plant and the results of a non-steady state finite element method temperaturestress analysis.

|5. On-site efficiency check
Figure 6 shows the results of the regenerative heat treatment applied to a main steam pipe
elbow from the roof housing of an actual plant boiler. We determined that the equipment andmaterials to perform the regenerative heat treatment (i.e., the heating coil and transformer) could beeasily transported into and out of the plant, the regenerative heat treatment could be performed
without any problem, and that there were no issues with the efficiency of the work.

Figure 6 On-site efficiency check of theregenerative heat treatment process

Figure 7 Cross-sectional structure before
and after application of theregenerative heat treatment process|6. Structural changes due to regenerative heat treatment
Figure 7 shows an example of the cross-sectional structure before and after the regenerative
heat treatment application. The treatment reduced the creep cavity number density by 85%.
Furthermore, due to the effect of the re-crystallization heat treatment, some of the cavities
generated on grain boundaries were enclosed in grains, and the structure became ferrite perlite
equivalent to that of the base material.
Because examination of the cross-sectional structure suggested the possibility of life
extension by regenerative heat treatment, we used a destructive test to see if this was so.

|7. Life-extension test
We measured the effect of the regenerative heat treatment using a compact uniaxial creep test
to test the distribution of the life-extension effect in the direction of the wall thickness, and areal-scale creep burst test to test the life-extension effect on an actual-sized elbow. The tests wereconducted on a main steam pipe elbow removed from the boiler of an actual plant. The life
consumption ratio of the external surface of the heat-affected zone of the longitudinal weld on theinternal bend side of the tested elbow was 75%. The elbow specifications were as follows:・ External diameter: 355.9 mm
・ Wall thickness: 77 mm
・ Material: ASTM A387GrD-NT（2.25Cr-1Mo steel)・ Operating period: 191,340 hr

7.1

Destructive testing overview

The results of destructive testing were converted into the remaining life at the temperature of
the actual plant with the iso-stress method using the results of a compact uniaxial creep test
executed separately from the test described in Section 7.2 below. Specimens for that test were
sampled from the main steam pipe elbow subjected to regenerative heat treatment after its removalfrom the actual plant boiler, and the test was executed under three different temperature conditions.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 46 No. 2 (June. 2009)
527.2Compact uniaxial creep test

Specimens were sampled from the elbow removed after the regenerative heat treatment of thelongitudinal weld on the internal bend side of the roof housing. The test temperature was 650°C.
The stress after relaxation of the external surface on the internal bend side of the elbow wasdetermined to be 46.2 MPa; this was estimated using creep analysis when the rated operatingpressure 24.5MPa of the actual plant was applied.
Figure 8 shows the results of the compact uniaxial creep test. The result with the portion not
subjected to the treatment was for specimens taken from a cross-section far from the induction
heating coil, while the result for the portion subjected to the treatment was for specimens takenfrom a cross-section immediately below the center of the induction heating coil. The specimens
were taken from four different locations in the direction of the depth from the two cross-sections.
These results show that the remaining life of the portion not subjected to the treatment tended
to be shorter for locations nearer to the external surface of the pipe; the shortest remaining life of
93,000 hr was for the location 10 mm from the external surface of the pipe. The longest remaining
life in the portion subjected to the regenerative heat treatment tended to be longer for locations
nearer to the external surface of the pipe. The remaining life of the pipe 10 mm from the externalsurface was the longest (340,000 hr), while the shortest life was at 40 mm from the external surface(200,000 hr).
These results show that the life-extension effect of the regenerative heat treatment is high inthe vicinity of the external surface of the pipe and is thus effective.

Figure 8 Distribution of life-extension effects in the wall thickness direction according to thecompact uniaxial creep test

7.3

Real-scale creep burst test

Figure 9 shows an external view of the specimen for the real-scale creep burst test. The
regenerative heat treatment was applied to the longitudinal weld on the internal bend side of thespecimen after the lid plates were attached to the elbow that had been removed from an actualplant. The temperature and pressure during the test were 630°C and 24.5 MPa, respectively, toemulate actual plant operating conditions. A crack 4.5 mm deep appeared in the former
heat-affected zone on the surface of the longitudinal weld on internal bend side of the elbow 1874
hr after the start of the real-scale creep burst test.
Figure 10 shows the life-extension effect due to the regenerative heat treatment. The
remaining life until cracking occurred was converted into the actual plant life without applicationof the regenerative heat treatment. The time until cracking occurred was determined by the creep
cavity number density method based on the life consumption ratio of the heat-affected zone of thelongitudinal weld on internal bend side of the specimen before application of the regenerative heattreatment.
In addition, since the remaining life until cracking occurred was converted into the actual
plant life after execution of the regenerative heat treatment, the time until generation of a crack on
the external surface during the real-scale creep burst test was determined the by iso-stress method
and converted into the actual plant life.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 46 No. 2 (June. 2009)
53

These results show that the remaining life until cracking occurred, converted into actual planttime, was 63,000 hr without the heat treatment and 200,000 hr with the heat treatment. Thisconfirmed that a life extension of approximately 130,000 hr was possible.

Figure 9 External view of the specimen for
the real-scale creep burst test

Figure 10 Testing the effect of the life extension
using the real-scale creep burst test

|8. Future work
In the future, we will gather more data for other pipes in different plants to confirm thereliability of the life-extension process using the regenerative heat treatment method.

References
1234

Thermal and Nuclear Power Engineering Society，Thermal & Nuclear Power Plant Installation Handbook(Rev. FY2005), 2006.
Nishida, Yugami, et al., “High Temperature Creep Burst Testing for Welded High Temperature Reheater
Steam Pipe (2nd Report: Consideration of Non-Destructive Life Assessment Methods),” 36th High
Temperature Strength Symposium Pre-Print Collection，1998，pp.30-34
Nishida et al., “Experimental Consideration of the Creep Rupture Mechanism in Boiler High Temperature
Reheater Steam Pipe Longitudinal Weldments,” Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Paper Collection
Edition A, Vol. 66 No. 645，2000，pp.86-93 (in Japanese).
Takumi T. et al.，Life Assessment System of High-Energy Piping in Fossil Power Boilers，Mitsubishi Juko
Giho Vol.38 No．2 (2001)，P.84-86

Authors
Fumitoshi Sakata
Power Systems ServiceManagement Department
Power Systems Headquarters

Masashi Ozaki
Nagasaki Research & Development
Center, Technical Headquarters

Nobuhiko NishimuraManager
Nagasaki Research &Development Center, TechnicalHeadquarters

Akira Shiibashi
Manager
Power Systems Quality ManagementDepartment
Power Systems Headquarters

Masahiro Kobayashi
Deputy General Manager
Boiler Engineering Department
Power Systems Headquarters