Section One

TAKING THE REINSOF GOVERNMENT

A

merica’s Bicentennial, which culminated on July 4, 1976, was a spiritedand unifying celebration of our country, its Founding, and its ideals. As weapproach our nation’s 250th anniversary, which will take place during thenext presidency, America is now divided between two opposing forces: woke revolutionaries and those who believe in the ideals of the American revolution. The former
believe that America is—and always has been—“systemically racist” and that it is not
worth celebrating and must be fundamentally transformed, largely through a centralized administrative state. The latter believe in America’s history and heroes, its
principles and promise, and in everyday Americans and the American way of life. They
believe in the Constitution and republican government. Conservatives—the Americanists in this battle—must fight for the soul of America, which is very much at stake.
Just two years after the death of the last surviving Constitutional Conventiondelegate, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln warned that the greatest threat toAmerica would come not from without, but from within. This is evident today:
Whether it be mask and vaccine mandates, school and business closures, efforts
to keep Americans from driving gas cars or using gas stoves, or efforts to defund
the police, indoctrinate schoolchildren, alter beloved books, abridge free speech,
undermine the colorblind ideal, or deny the biological reality that there are only
two sexes, the Left’s steady stream of insanity appears to be never-ending. The
next Administration must stand up for American ideals, American families, andAmerican culture—all things in which, thankfully, most Americans still believe.
Highlighting this need, former director of the Office of Management and Budget
Russ Vought writes in Chapter 2, “The modern conservative President’s task is to— 19 —

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise

limit, control, and direct the executive branch on behalf of the American people.”At the core of this goal is the work of the White House and the central personnelagencies. Article II of the Constitution vests all federal executive power in a President, made accountable to the citizenry through regular elections. Our Founders
wrote, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United Statesof America.” Accordingly, Vought writes, “it is the President’s agenda that should
matter to the departments and agencies,” not their own.
Yet the federal bureaucracy has a mind of its own. Federal employees are often
ideologically aligned—not with the majority of the American people—but with one
another, posing a profound problem for republican government, a government“of, by, and for” the people. As Donald Devine, Dennis Kirk, and Paul Dans writein Chapter 3, “An autonomous bureaucracy has neither independent constitutional status nor separate moral legitimacy.” Byzantine personnel rules provide thebureaucrats with their chief means of self-protection. What’s more, knowledge ofsuch rules is used to thwart the President’s appointees and agenda. As Devine, Kirk,and Dans write, “Managing the immense bureaucracy of the federal governmentis impossible without an understanding of the key central personnel agencies andtheir governing laws and regulations.”
Many of these laws and regulations governing a largely underworked, overcompensated, and unaccountable federal civilian workforce are so irrational thatthey would be comical in a less important context. This is true whether it comes toevaluating employees’ performance or hiring new employees. Only in the federal
government could an applicant in the hiring process be sent to the front of theline because of a “history of drug addiction” or “alcoholism,” or due to “morbidobesity,” “irritable bowel syndrome,” or a “psychiatric disorder.” The next Administration should insist that the federal government’s hiring, evaluation, retention,and compensation practices benefit taxpayers, rather than benefiting the lowestrung of the federal workforce.
In order to carry out the President’s desires, political appointees must be
given the tools, knowledge, and support to overcome the federal government’s
obstructionist Human Resources departments. More fundamentally, the new
Administration must fill its ranks with political appointees. Devine, Kirk, and Dans
observe that “the Trump Administration appointed fewer political appointees in
its first few months in office” than any other recent presidency. This left career
employees in charge in many places. This can occur even after departments havebeen fully staffed with political appointees. Vought writes that the White House
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) should establish a “reputation as thekeeper of ‘commander’s intent,’” yet OMB is dominated by career employees whooften try to overrule political appointees serving in the various executive departments. Empowering political appointees across the Administration is crucial toa President’s success.

— 20 —

2025 Presidential Transition Project

Above all, the President and those who serve under him or her must be committed to the Constitution and the rule of law. This is particularly true of a conservativeAdministration, which knows that the President is there to uphold the Constitution, not the other way around. If a conservative Administration does not respect
the Constitution, no Administration will. In Chapter 1, former deputy chief ofstaff to the President Rick Dearborn writes that the White House Counsel “musttake seriously the duty to protect the powers and privileges of the President fromencroachments by Congress, the judiciary, and the administrative components ofdepartments and agencies.” Equally important, the President must enforce theConstitution and laws as written, rather than proclaiming new “law” unilaterally.
Presidents should not issue mask or vaccine mandates, arbitrarily transfer student
loan debt, or issue monarchical mandates of any sort. Legislatures make the laws
in a republic, not executives.
It is crucial that all three branches of the federal government respect what Madison called the “double security” to our liberties: the separation of powers among
the three branches, and the separation of powers between the federal government
and the states. This double security has been greatly compromised over the years.
Vought writes that “the modern executive branch…writes federal policy, enforcesthat policy, and often adjudicates whether that policy was properly drafted andenforced.” He describes this as “constitutionally dire” and “in urgent need of repair,”adding: “Nothing less than the survival of self-governance in America is at stake.”
When it comes to ensuring that freedom can flourish, nothing is more important than deconstructing the centralized administrative state. Political appointees
who are answerable to the President and have decision-making authority in theexecutive branch are key to this essential task. The next Administration must notcede such authority to non-partisan “experts,” who pursue their own ends while
engaging in groupthink, insulated from American voters. The following chaptersdetail how the next Administration can be responsive to the American people (notto entrenched “elites”); how it can take care that all the laws are “faithfully executed,” not merely those that the President desires to see executed; and how it canachieve results and not be stymied by an unelected bureaucracy.

— 21 —