CSRP 2014

What is CSRP?
12

1. Residents of Iwaki city, explaining the difficulties of raising children in the current situation. 2. Anand Grover, a Special Rapporteur of the HumanRights Council of the United Nations, participated by video message.

CSRP’s planned activities
CSRP will build up on the past accomplishments by:•continuing to organize a Citizen-Scientist International Symposium on Radiation Protection every
year;

The Citizen-Scientist International Symposium on Radiation Protection (CSRP) is a non-profit
organization which is politically, financially, ideologically and religiously independent. CSPR
was created by concerned, free-thinking citizens who have been committed to keeping radiation
damages on health and environment to minimum due to the Tokyo Electric Fukushima Daiichi
Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) disaster that followed the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami
in March 11, 2011.
The TEPCO nuclear disaster dispersed radioactive materials across Fukushima Prefecture andneighboring regions. Radioactive contamination has also affected the entire Eastern Japan, North
Pacific Ocean, and the entire northern hemisphere of the planet, and the release from the plantstill continues. Even today, no credible technologies are on the horizon to halt the release ofradionuclides from FDNPP into the environment, especially the ocean.

•o rganizing workshops for the general public so that they can acquire skills to analyze thediscourses of the government and its “scientists,” and to “decipher” easily missed “inconsistencies”
and hidden agendas in such discourses.

Apprehension of the people in contaminated areas is exacerbated by the fact that health effectsof low-dose radiation exposure are not yet well understood, and above all, by the mistrust in theinformation and radiation protection measures provided by the Japanese government.

•What is needed now is to minimize the health risks ― not the financial cost of reconstruction ― bytaking proactive radiation protection measures based on the precautionary principle.

suggesting a new decision-making process where various stakeholders can carry out constructivediscussions. This can be accomplished by clearly delineating role sharing between scientific expertiseand policy- and decision-making processes, unlike the current policy-making process where decisionmaking relies on advice by the same recurrent group of “experts.”

CSRP needs your support
Your financial support is essential for CSRP to continue and expand activities independent of any
existing organizations. We sincerely welcome your partnership.

The purpose of CSRP is to gather the latest scientific findings from the world on health effectsof ionizing radiation and share them with citizens. Furthermore, CSRP aims to provide citizenscientists from within and outside of Japan with a table for discussion on health effects of ionizing
radiation and on protective measures, contributing at the same time to the establishment of anextensive international network for citizens’ radiation protection.
CSRP 2014

Citizen-Scientist International Symposium on Radiation Protection (CSRP)
Murata Daiichi Building, Suite 506
4-28-8 Yoyogi, Shibuya Ward, Tokyo, JAPAN 151-0053
TEL & FAX 03-6276-2662
E-MAIL: info@csrp.jp
4

Round-table with experts and citizens
1

CSRP 2014

CSRP 2014

Briefing on the situation at the FDNPP by Hiroaki Koide, a nuclear engineer and a former research associate at the Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute (KURRI).

1. Keith Baverstock, a radiation biologist, lecture on the health effects of low radiation doses. 2. Presentation by Yoko Matsuda, a researcher at theResearch Institute of Disaster Area Reconstruction, Kwansei Gakuin University. 3. Toshihide Tsuda, an epidemiologist at the Okayama University, notedexcess cases of childhood thyroid cancer in Fukushima Prefecture.

1

What CSRP has done so far

Since March 11, 2011, CSRP has held an annual international symposium on radiation protection,
covering the health and environmental effects of ionizing radiation. During the 2-day session,latest scientific findings were presented by the invited experts, who have steadfastly maintained
their independence from the governments and the industries, as well as the mainstream academic
societies influenced by such entities.
Adequate time was allotted for roundtable discussions where experts, citizens, and residents ofthe disaster-affected areas could exchange views in order to explore a way to apply the scientificfindings towards improving radiation protection measures already in place.
The past four symposia have revealed the following crucial points:• M any nations, including Japan, base their radiation protection measures on the recommendations
by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). However, there is suspicion thatICRP’s findings on radiation health effects might be underestimates;• V ery little is known about the levels and the extent of the early exposure to the radioactive plumeduring the first few days after the accident, and dose reconstruction is essential in predicting
potential health effects;• R ather than being limited to cancers, radiation health effects can extend to a variety of non-cancer
diseases;• S ome of the abnormalities observed in animals after the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident
have already been seen in the radioactively contaminated areas in Eastern Japan;• E
 ver since the accident, official discourses suggest as if the effective dose of 100 mSv might be thethreshold under which no health effects are expected;• T he radioprotection system by the government and its collaborative “experts” likely has caused
secondary damages in terms of the right to health as well as the protection of human rights;• In order to fomulate an optimal radiation protection system in the future, it is essential to reach a223decision-making through constructive discussions by a wide variety of people. This can be accomplishedby establishing a committee consisting of, in addition to radiation-related experts, those affected by thedisaster, citizen groups, clinicians, lawyers, social scientists, philosophers, ethicists, etc.
These outcomes have been published in leading scientific journals in Japan, and publicly released
in both Japanese and English on CRSP’s web site: http://crsp.jp

CSRP’s objectives in the society
The TEPCO nuclear disaster, with the resultant radioactive contamination, is a symbolic incident
that revealed negative aspects of modern science and technology. It also shares the sameunderlying issues with other problems our modern society is facing (such as chemical pollution,bioethical issues, and food safety). In short, it portraits how independence of “science” isthreatened by the interests of the industry and how such corrupted “science” rules the society.
Current policies underestimate radiation health effects in order to contain future compensations
for an enourmous number of victims with potential radiation exposure, encouraging residents toremain in or return to highly contaminated areas ordinarily considered illegal to reside or enter.
While “scientists” protected by the government provide “scientific” evidence to such policies,
disaster victims and cleanup workers are treated as “non-scientists” and effectively removed fromthe decision-making process. Furthermore, even at this moment, they are forced to suffer from
unnecessary radiation exposure which should not be there to begin with. This picture is nothingother than the epitome of negative aspects of a modern “scientific and technological society.”
What needs to be done now is to re-evaluate health effects of radiation on the basis of true “science”
independent of politics and industries: a fact-based process of pursuing verifiable knowledge, freefrom any conflict of interests. We also need to establish a process of finding an optimal way outof the current confusion with no clear visions towards a full restoration of victims’ humanity. Thiscan be accomplished by making decisions based on recommendations and opinions not just fromscientists but from those with a variety of backgrounds, such as victims, civil groups, experts inother fields, local and central government officials, etc. “CSRP” was conceived as a place to develop
and practice such processes.
3