Citation: S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

N(1710) 1/2+I (J P ) = 21 ( 21 + ) Status:∗∗∗∗Older and obsolete values are listed and referenced in the 2014 edition, Chinese Physics C38 070001 (2014).

N(1710) POLE POSITIONREAL PARTVALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

1650 to 1750 (≈ 1700) OUR ESTIMATE1605± 7
ROENCHEN 22 DPWA Multichannel
1690± 15ANISOVICH
17A DPWA Multichannel
1 ANISOVICH
1697± 23
17A L+P
γ p, π − p → K Λ
21770± 5± 2
SVARC
14 L+P
πN → πN1690± 20
CUTKOSKY 80 IPWA π N → π N• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •1615
HUNT19 DPWA Multichannel
1651
ROENCHEN 15A DPWA Multichannel
1690± 15SOKHOYAN 15A DPWA Multichannel
1690± 15GUTZ
14 DPWA Multichannel
1670
SHKLYAR
13 DPWA Multichannel
1687± 17
ANISOVICH
12A DPWA Multichannel
3 BATINIC
1711± 15
10 DPWA π N → N π, N η
1679
VRANA00 DPWA Multichannel
1690
HOEHLER
93 SPED π N → π N
1698
CUTKOSKY 90 IPWA π N → π N
1 Statistical error only.
2 Fit to the amplitudes of HOEHLER 79.
3 BATINIC 10 finds evidence for a second P
11 state with all parameters except for thephase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.

−2×IMAGINARY PARTVALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT80 to 160 (≈ 120) OUR ESTIMATE
115± 5ROENCHEN 22 DPWA Multichannel
155± 25
ANISOVICH
17A DPWA Multichannel
1 ANISOVICH
84± 34
17A L+P
γ p, π − p → K Λ
2 SVARC98± 8± 514 L+PπN → πN
80± 20
CUTKOSKY 80 IPWA π N → π N• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •169
121
170± 20170± 20159200± 25174± 16132200
88
1 Statistical error only.

HUNTROENCHENSOKHOYANGUTZSHKLYARANISOVICH
3 BATINICVRANA
HOEHLER
CUTKOSKY

https://pdg.lbl.gov

Page 1

1915A
15A
141312A
1000
9390

DPWA Multichannel
DPWA Multichannel
DPWA Multichannel
DPWA Multichannel
DPWA Multichannel
DPWA Multichannel
DPWA π N → N π, N η
DPWA Multichannel
SPED π N → π N
IPWA π N → π N

Created: 5/31/2024 10:12

Citation: S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

2 Fit to the amplitudes of HOEHLER 79.
3 BATINIC 10 finds evidence for a second P
11 state with all parameters except for thephase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.

N(1710) ELASTIC POLE RESIDUEMODULUS r
VALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

4 to 10 (≈ 7) OUR ESTIMATE
5.5± 2.4
ROENCHEN 22 DPWA Multichannel
6 ±3
SOKHOYAN 15A DPWA Multichannel
1 SVARC5 ±1 ±114 L+P
πN → πN
8 ±2
CUTKOSKY 80 IPWA π N → π N• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •3.2
ROENCHEN 15A DPWA Multichannel
6 ±3
GUTZ
14 DPWA Multichannel
11SHKLYAR
13 DPWA Multichannel
6 ±4
ANISOVICH
12A DPWA Multichannel
2 BATINIC
24
10 DPWA π N → N π, N η
15HOEHLER
93 SPED π N → π N
9CUTKOSKY 90 IPWA π N → π N
1 Fit to the amplitudes of HOEHLER 79.
2 BATINIC 10 finds evidence for a second P
11 state with all parameters except for thephase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.

PHASE θVALUE (◦ )DOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

120 to 270 (≈ 190) OUR ESTIMATE− 114± 29
ROENCHEN 22 DPWA Multichannel
130± 35SOKHOYAN 15A DPWA Multichannel
1 SVARC− 104± 7± 314 L+PπN → πN
175± 35
CUTKOSKY 80 IPWA π N → π N• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •55
ROENCHEN 15A DPWA Multichannel
120± 45GUTZ
14 DPWA Multichannel
9SHKLYAR
13 DPWA Multichannel
120± 70
ANISOVICH
12A DPWA Multichannel
2 BATINIC
2010 DPWA π N → N π, N η− 167
CUTKOSKY 90 IPWA π N → π N
1 Fit to the amplitudes of HOEHLER 79.
2 BATINIC 10 finds evidence for a second P
11 state with all parameters except for thephase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.

N(1710) INELASTIC POLE RESIDUE
The “normalized residue” is the residue divided by Γpole /2.

Normalized residue in N π → N(1710) → N η
MODULUSPHASE (◦ )DOCUMENT ID

0.28± 0.13
0.12± 0.04

91 ± 32
0 ± 45ROENCHENANISOVICH

https://pdg.lbl.gov

Page 2TECNCOMMENT

22 DPWA Multichannel
12A DPWA Multichannel

Created: 5/31/2024 10:12

Citation: S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •0.16− 180

ROENCHEN

15A DPWA Multichannel

Normalized residue in N π → N(1710) → Λ K
MODULUSPHASE (◦ )DOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

0.20± 0.10− 144 ± 39
ROENCHEN 22 DPWA Multichannel
0.16± 0.05
− 160 ± 25
ANISOVICH
17A DPWA Multichannel+0.24
1 ANISOVICH
0.12 − 0.12− 119 ± 83
17A L+Pγ p, π − p → K Λ• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •0.12− 320.17± 0.06
− 110 ± 20
1 Statistical error only.

ROENCHENANISOVICH

15A DPWA Multichannel
12A DPWA Multichannel

Normalized residue in N π → N(1710) → Σ K
MODULUSPHASE (◦ )DOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

0.055± 0.024
162 ± 153
ROENCHEN 22 DPWA Multichannel• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •0.004− 43

ROENCHEN

15A DPWA Multichannel

Normalized residue in N π → N(1710) → N(1535)π
MODULUSPHASE (◦ )DOCUMENT ID

0.10± 0.04

140 ± 40

GUTZTECN14COMMENTDPWA Multichannel

N(1710) BREIT-WIGNER MASSVALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

1680 to 1740 (≈ 1710) OUR ESTIMATE
1 HUNT
1648± 1619 DPWA Multichannel
1715± 20SOKHOYAN 15A DPWA Multichannel
1 SHKLYAR
1737± 17
13 DPWA Multichannel
1700± 50
CUTKOSKY 80 IPWA π N → π N
1723± 9HOEHLER
79 IPWA π N → π N• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •1715± 20
GUTZ14 DPWA Multichannel
1710± 20
ANISOVICH
12A DPWA Multichannel
1 SHRESTHA
1662± 7
12A DPWA Multichannel
2 BATINIC
1729± 16
10 DPWA π N → N π, N η
1752± 3PENNER
02C DPWA Multichannel
1699± 65
VRANA
00 DPWA Multichannel
1 Statistical error only.
2 BATINIC 10 finds evidence for a second P
11 state with all parameters except for thephase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.

N(1710) BREIT-WIGNER WIDTHVALUE (MeV)

DOCUMENT ID

80 to 200 (≈ 140) OUR ESTIMATE
1 HUNT
195± 46
175± 15SOKHOYAN
1 SHKLYAR368± 120

https://pdg.lbl.gov

Page 3TECNCOMMENT

19 DPWA Multichannel
15A DPWA Multichannel
13 DPWA Multichannel

Created: 5/31/2024 10:12

Citation: S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

93± 30
CUTKOSKY 90 IPWA π N → π N
90± 30
CUTKOSKY 80 IPWA π N → π N
120± 15
HOEHLER
79 IPWA π N → π N• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •175± 15GUTZ
14 DPWA Multichannel
200± 18
ANISOVICH
12A DPWA Multichannel
1 SHRESTHA
116± 17
12A DPWA Multichannel
2 BATINIC
180± 1710 DPWA π N → N π, N η
386± 59
PENNER
02C DPWA Multichannel
143± 100
VRANA
00 DPWA Multichannel
1 Statistical error only.
2 BATINIC 10 finds evidence for a second P
11 state with all parameters except for thephase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.

N(1710) DECAY MODES
The following branching fractions are our estimates, not fits or averages.

Γ1
Γ2
Γ3
Γ4
Γ5
Γ6
Γ7
Γ8
Γ9
Γ10
Γ11Γ12ModeFraction (Γi /Γ)NπNηNωΛKΣKNππ∆(1232)π , P-waveN ρ , S=1/2, P-wave
NσN(1535)πp γ , helicity=1/2n γ , helicity=1/2

5–20 %
10–50 %
1–5 %5–25 %
seen
14–48 %
3–9 %
11–23 %
<16 %9–21 %
0.002–0.08 %0.0–0.02%

N(1710) BRANCHING RATIOSΓ N π /Γtotal
VALUE (%)

Γ1 /ΓDOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

5 to 20 (≈ 10) OUR ESTIMATE
1 HUNT
12± 6
19 DPWA Multichannel
5± 3
SOKHOYAN 15A DPWA Multichannel
1 SHKLYAR
2± 2
13 PWA Multichannel
20± 4
CUTKOSKY 80 IPWA π N → π N
12± 4
HOEHLER
79 IPWA π N → π N• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •5± 35± 4
15± 4

https://pdg.lbl.gov

GUTZ
ANISOVICH
1 SHRESTHAPage 4

14 DPWA Multichannel
12A DPWA Multichannel
12A DPWA Multichannel

Created: 5/31/2024 10:12

Citation: S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

2 BATINIC
22± 2410 DPWA π N → N π, N η
14± 8
PENNER
02C DPWA Multichannel
27± 13VRANA
00 DPWA Multichannel
1 Statistical error only.
2 BATINIC 10 finds evidence for a second P
11 state with all parameters except for thephase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.

Γ N η /Γtotal
VALUE (%)

Γ2 /ΓDOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

10 to 50 (≈ 30) OUR ESTIMATE
18± 10MUELLER
20 DPWA Multichannel
1 HUNT17± 8
19 DPWA Multichannel
1 SHKLYAR
45± 4
13 DPWA Multichannel
17± 10
ANISOVICH
12A DPWA Multichannel• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •1 SHRESTHA
11± 7
12A DPWA Multichannel
26± 8BATINIC
10 DPWA π N → N π, N η
36± 11PENNER
02C DPWA Multichannel
6± 1VRANA
00 DPWA Multichannel
1 Statistical error only.
2 BATINIC 10 finds evidence for a second P
11 state with all parameters except for thephase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.

Γ N ω /Γtotal
VALUE (%)

Γ3 /ΓDOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

1 to 5 (≈ 3) OUR ESTIMATE
2± 2
DENISENKO 16 DPWA Multichannel
1 SHKLYAR
3± 2
13 DPWA Multichannel• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •13± 2
1 Statistical error only.

PENNER

02C DPWA MultichannelΓ Λ K /Γtotal
VALUE (%)

Γ4 /ΓDOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

5 to 25 (≈ 15) OUR ESTIMATE
1 HUNT
1.8± 1.5
19 DPWA Multichannel
23 ± 7ANISOVICH
12A DPWA Multichannel
5 ± 3
SHKLYAR
05 DPWA Multichannel• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •1 SHRESTHA
8 ± 4
12A DPWA Multichannel
5 ± 2
10 ± 10
1 Statistical error only.

PENNERVRANA

02C DPWA Multichannel
00 DPWA MultichannelΓ Σ K /Γtotal
VALUE (%)

Γ5 /ΓDOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •7± 7PENNER

https://pdg.lbl.gov

Page 502C DPWA Multichannel

Created: 5/31/2024 10:12

Citation: S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)Γ ∆(1232)π , P-wave /Γtotal
VALUE (%)

Γ7 /ΓDOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

3–9 % OUR ESTIMATE
1 HUNT28± 919 DPWA Multichannel• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •1 SHRESTHA
6± 3
12A DPWA Multichannel
39± 8
1 Statistical error only.

VRANA00

DPWA MultichannelΓ N ρ , S=1/2, P-wave /Γtotal
VALUE (%)

Γ8 /ΓDOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

11–23 % OUR ESTIMATE
1 HUNT17± 9
19 DPWA Multichannel• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •1 SHRESTHA
17± 6
12A DPWA Multichannel
17± 1
1 Statistical error only.

VRANA00

DPWA MultichannelΓ N σ /Γtotal

Γ9 /Γ

VALUE (%)

DOCUMENT ID<16 % OUR ESTIMATE<161 Statistical error only.

1 HUNT

TECN

19COMMENTDPWA MultichannelΓ N(1535)π /Γtotal

Γ10 /ΓVALUE (%)

DOCUMENT ID

15± 6

GUTZ

TECN

14COMMENTDPWA Multichannel

N(1710) PHOTON DECAY AMPLITUDES AT THE POLE
N(1710) → p γ , helicity-1/2 amplitude A1/2
MODULUS (GeV−1/2 )PHASE (◦ )DOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT− 0.018± 0.010
40 ± 55
ROENCHEN 22 DPWA Multichannel• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •0.020− 83

ROENCHEN

15A DPWA Multichannel

N(1710) → n γ , helicity-1/2 amplitude A1/2
MODULUS (GeV−1/2 )PHASE (◦ )DOCUMENT ID

0.029± 0.007

80 ± 20

ANISOVICHTECNCOMMENT

17E DPWA Multichannel

N(1710) BREIT-WIGNER PHOTON DECAY AMPLITUDESN(1710) → p γ , helicity-1/2 amplitude A1/2
VALUE (GeV−1/2 )0.014± 0.008
0.050± 0.010− 0.050± 0.001

https://pdg.lbl.gov

DOCUMENT ID

1 HUNTSOKHOYAN
1 SHKLYAR

Page 6TECNCOMMENT

19 DPWA Multichannel
15A DPWA Multichannel
13 DPWA Multichannel

Created: 5/31/2024 10:12

Citation: S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •0.05 ± 0.01
0.052± 0.015− 0.008± 0.003
0.044
1 Statistical error only.

GUTZ
ANISOVICH
1 SHRESTHAPENNER

1412A
12A
02D

DPWA Multichannel
DPWA Multichannel
DPWA Multichannel
DPWA Multichannel

N(1710) → n γ , helicity-1/2 amplitude A1/2
VALUE (GeV−1/2 )DOCUMENT ID

TECNCOMMENT

1 HUNT
0.0053± 0.0003
19 DPWA Multichannel− 0.040 ± 0.020
ANISOVICH
13B DPWA Multichannel• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •1 SHRESTHA
0.017 ± 0.003
12A DPWA Multichannel− 0.024
1 Statistical error only.

PENNER

02D DPWA Multichannel

N(1710) REFERENCES
For early references, see Physics Letters 111B 1 (1982).
ROENCHENMUELLERHUNTANISOVICHANISOVICH
DENISENKO
ROENCHENSOKHOYAN
GUTZ
PDG
SVARC
ANISOVICHSHKLYARANISOVICHSHRESTHABATINICSHKLYARPENNERPENNERVRANAHOEHLER
CUTKOSKY
CUTKOSKY
Also
HOEHLER
Also

22201917A
17E
1615A15A
14141413B
1312A
12A
100502C
02D00
93908079

EPJ A58 229
PL B803 135323
PR C99 055205
PRL 119 062004
PR C96 055202
PL B755 97
EPJ A51 70
EPJ A51 95
EPJ A50 74
CP C38 070001
PR C89 045205
EPJ A49 67
PR C87 015201
EPJ A48 15
PR C86 055203
PR C82 038203
PR C72 015210
PR C66 055211
PR C66 055212
PRPL 328 181
π N Newsletter 9 1
PR D42 235
Toronto Conf. 19
PR D20 2839
PDAT 12-1
Toronto Conf. 3

https://pdg.lbl.gov

D. Roenchen et al.
(JULI, GWU, BONN+)
J. Mueller et al.
(CBELSA/TAPS Collab.)
B.C. Hunt, D.M. Manley
A.V. Anisovich et al.
A.V. Anisovich et al.
(BONN, PNPI, JLAB+)
I. Denisenko et al.
D. Roenchen et al.
V. Sokhoyan et al.
(CBELSA/TAPS Collab.)
E. Gutz et al.
(CBELSA/TAPS Collab.)
K. Olive et al.
(PDG Collab.)
A. Svarc et al.
(RBI Zagreb, UNI Tuzla)
A.V. Anisovich et al.
V. Shklyar, H. Lenske, U. Mosel(GIES)
A.V. Anisovich et al.
(BONN, PNPI)
M. Shrestha, D.M. Manley(KSU)
M. Batinic et al.
(ZAGR)
V. Shklyar, H. Lenske, U. Mosel(GIES)
G. Penner, U. Mosel(GIES)
G. Penner, U. Mosel(GIES)
T.P. Vrana, S.A. Dytman, T.-S.H. Lee(PITT, ANL)
G. Hohler(KARL)
R.E. Cutkosky, S. Wang
(CMU)
R.E. Cutkosky et al.
(CMU, LBL) IJP
R.E. Cutkosky et al.
(CMU, LBL) IJP
G. Hohler et al.
(KARLT) IJP
R. Koch(KARLT) IJP

Page 7Created: 5/31/2024 10:12