Towards a Safer Sri Lanka

A Road Map for Disaster Risk Management

Volume 2: Project Proposals
April 2006

Ministry of Disaster Management andHuman Rights
Government of Sri Lanka

Ministry of Finance and Planning

Supported by

U N
D P

United Nations Development ProgrammeTowards a Safer Sri Lanka: A Road Map for Disaster Risk Management
ISBN : 955-1393-01-5

Published by the Disaster Management Centre
Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights
Supported by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

April 2006

Disaster Management Centre
Ministry of Disaster Management & Human Rights
Government of Sri Lanka
Tel: +94-11-2441570/73
Fax: +94-11-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

Design & Print - NEO Graphics 2803030

Ii

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Message from Honourable MinisterIn the immediate aftermath of the Tsunami of 26 December 2004, it was my privilege tochair the Parliamentary Select Committee established by the Sri Lankan Parliament toinvestigate whether there was a lack of preparedness to meet an emergency of the nature of
the Tsunami, and to recommend what steps should be taken to minimize the damage causedby similar natural disasters. The Parliamentary Select Committee was successful inreaching to all parties concerned in order to recommend very important initiatives to beundertaken towards a safer Sri Lanka in the context of natural disasters, which the present
Road Map on DRM has incorporated.
It is a great satisfaction therefore, as the Minister in charge of the subject of disaster risk
management, to be able to launch the second volume of the Road Map for Sri Lanka. Since
the catastrophic Tsunami, the Government of Sri Lanka has taken great steps to create anenabling and conducive environment for disaster risk reduction towards ensuring
sustainable development in the country.
With an institutional base and supporting legal, policy framework in place, and a better
understanding of what the key priorities for action are, how they should be accomplished,by whom, and when, we are set to embark on a challenging journey towards building a safer
Sri Lanka. The end benefit would be to have in place the best possible capability in terms of
institutions, structures, systems, mechanisms and human resources, to ensure that risks are
mitigated and lives, assets and environment are safeguarded in the event of a disaster, and to
recover to a level better than before.
The Road Map Volume II contains over 100 detailed proposals that aim to provide
development partners with more information on each activity listed under the seventhematic areas in Volume I. The Road Map also contains proposals on human rights andconflict resolution, thereby also proposing creative approaches and solutions towards a
strategy of confidence building. I have no doubt that the proposals if implemented willcontribute significantly towards achieving sustainable development in the country andtowards peace building.
I take this opportunity to thank Dr. P B Jayasundera for his personal involvement in thisexercise. We face a great challenge ahead of us, together, however, with a bipartisan
approach, strong political will and support from our development partners I am convincedthat our vision will ultimately be translated into reality for the benefit of people of Sri
Lanka.
Mahinda Samarasinghe
Minister of Disaster Management & Human Rights
iii

iv

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Message from Secretary
It gives me immense pleasure to have contributed to the Second Volume of the Road Map
for a Safer Sri Lanka. The Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights has been
entrusted the subject of human rights in addition to the responsiblity for natural and humandisasters. Hence the proposals in this document adequately reflect the priority projects inthe areas of natural, human disasters and human rights.
The formulation of the Road Map represents a very significant achievement for the
Ministry since this clearly identifies the priority initiatives that need to be undertaken byvarious stakeholders- both public, private sectors and civil society to lead to a Sri Lanka thatcan pro-actively manage disasters.
The process of formulation of this document has been very consultative- the contributions
to this initiative from various stakeholders has been immense and I express my sincere
appreciation to all those who have contributed to this pioneering effort.
I also wish to particularly acknowledge the lead role played by the Disaster Management
Centre, in coordinating and in drawing upon the participation of all the relevant agencies
and institutions. The guidance provided by the Hon.Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe andhis personal interest in developing this Road Map has been invaluable.
I also wish to acknowledge the support received from United Nations Development
Programme in compiling this document. I have no doubt that this publication will pave theway for a safer Sri Lanka.
P. DiasAmarasinghe
Secretary
Ministry of Disaster Management & Human RightvviR o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Foreword
The 2004 Tsunami has wrought great damage and taken away almost 35,000 lives in Sri Lanka
alone; but as a result, disaster risk management has been placed on the list of national priorities for
Sri Lanka.
The various initiatives that have been successfully completed after the Tsunami, such as the SelectCommittee on Natural Disasters, enactment of the legislation on disaster management,
establishment of the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights, creation of the Disaster
Management Centre and establishment of the National Council for Disaster Management arehighly commendable.
The Department of Meteorology has also been gazetted under the Ministry of Disaster
Management and Human Rights, which is the locus of heightened activity, towards a safer Sri
Lanka. The Department of Meteorology has also been designated as the lead agency for Tsunami
Early Warning.
One of the important developments through the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human
Rights is the formulation of the Road Map for a Safer Sri Lanka, which has been evolved in a very
participatory and consultative manner with collaboration of all relevant stakeholders. This
exercise has been very well coordinated by the Disaster Management Centre with the support oflead agencies for different components; e.g: the thematic area of Early Warning was coordinated by
the Department of Meteorology.
The Road Map is a document that captures the priority activities to be embarked on by various
agencies that have to play a role in different areas of disaster risk management, over the short,medium and long term. As such, it is a very valuable document that will help coordinate efforts ofvarious institutions, agencies, departments, private sector and civil society, in the area of disasterrisk management.
It has been a pleasure to have contributed to this exercise and to have assisted in formulating a verypractical strategy towards reducing the disaster risks in Sri Lanka. I am confident that thisdocument will be of great value to Sri Lanka.
GHP Dharmaratne
Director General
Department of Meteorology
Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights
vii

viii

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Preface
In the aftermath of the 26 December 2004 Tsunami, some significant steps have been taken by theGovernment of Sri Lanka towards putting in place a disaster risk management framework:
Creation of the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights-

Enactment of Sri Lanka Disaster Management (DM) Act, No. 13 of 2005;
Establishment of the National Council for Disaster Management (NCDM) chairedby H.E the President; andCreation of the Disaster Management Centre as per the DM Act;

More recently the formulation and launch of the Road Map for Disaster Risk Management in Sri
Lanka has been a big step forward.
This Road Map is a ten year framework to be addressed in a systematic and prioritized manner with
the involvement of all relevant stakeholders. These priorities for action are consistent with the Sri
Lanka Disaster Management Act No. 13 of 2005, and also in line with the Hyogo Framework for
Action 2005-2015, which this Road Map will work towards implementing in the next decade. The
Road Map covers the areas of Policy, Institutional Mandates & Institutional Development;
Hazard, Vulnerability & Risk Assessment; Tsunami & Multi-hazard Early Warning Systems;
Disaster Preparedness Planning and Response; Disaster Mitigation and Integration into
Development Planning; Integration of Disaster Risk Reduction into Development Planning;
Community-based Disaster Management; Public Awareness, Education and Training.
The present document, the Road Map Volume II, consists of project proposals for each of the
proposed outputs under the seven components of the Road Map. These project proposals
incorporate all necessary details viz. agencies involved, objectives, outputs, activities, time frameand geographical area of implementation, along with the budget required, funding status and thelead agency. The hard work and commitment shown by the various stakeholders in putting together
these details for more than 100 projects is highly commendable and I am grateful to every working
group member for their involvement throughout.
I sincerely hope that this document will lead to greater support from Sri Lanka's development
partners.
Ialsotakethisopportunitytothankeveryoneinvolvedintheproductionofthisdocument andappreciatethe
support extended by the United Nations Development Programme for this activity and especially theguidancereceivedfromtheMinistryofDisasterManagementandHumanRights.
Major General Gamini Hettiarachchi
Director General
Disaster Management Centre
Ministry of Disaster Management & Human Rightsix

R o a d

x

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aContents
Message from Honourable Minister
Message from Secretary
Foreword
Preface
Acronyms
Executive Summary
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Roadmap for a safer Sri Lanka
1.1

Key Objectives

1.2

The Consultative Process

1.3

Components of the Road Map
1.3.1

Policy, Institutional Mandates and Institutional Development

1.3.2

Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Assessment

1.3.3

Tsunami and Multi-hazard Early Warning Systems

1.3.4

Preparedness and Response Plans

1.3.5

Mitigation and Integration of Disaster Risk Reduction
into Development Planning

1.3.6

Community-based Disaster Risk Management

1.3.7

Public Awareness, Education and Training

Chapter 2: Policy, Institutional Mandates and Institutional Development
2.1

Key Issues

2.2

Strategy

2.3

Project Proposals
P-1
Implementation of Provisions of DM Act
P-2

Institutional Mandates Reviewed
P-2.1
P-2.2

P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6

For Provincial Councils & Local Government Agencies
to Perform Disaster Related Activities
For Line Agencies to Perform Disaster Related Activities

Developing Institutional Mandates & Capacities
Formulation of CBDRM Policy
Enforcement of Policies
Establishment of the National Centre building housing the DMC,
Risk Assessment, Data Collection, Research and Analysis Centre,
Tsunami Warning Centre, Multi-Hazard Warning Centre andNational Emergency Operations CentrexiR o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

P-7

Facilitating the Reconciliation Process

P-8

Good Governance and the Law-Making Process

P-9

Strengthening Human Rights: Constitutional Reform

P-10

Strengthening Human Rights: Making Laws More Effective

P-11

Strengthening Women's Rights

P-12

Voting Rights of Migrant Works

P-13

Issues Pertaining to a Durable Peace in Sri Lanka

P-14

Encouraging Good Governance within the Ministry

Chapter 3: Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Assessment
3.1

Key Issues

3.2

Strategy

3.3

Project Proposals
HVR-1

Landslide Hazard Zonation Mapping

HVR-2

Establishment of DRM Information System at DMC

HVR-3

Flood Risk Assessment

HVR-4

Coastal Vulnerability Assessment & Risk Analysis

HVR-5

Development of Drought-prone Area Maps of LGA

HVR-6

Dam Safety & Risk Assessment

HVR-7

Vulnerability & Risk Assessment for LGA

HVR-8

Vulnerability Atlas

HVR-9

Development of Wind Zoning & Storm Surge Maps

HVR-10 Seismic Zonation Maps
HVR-11 Integrated Epidemic Risk Assessment
HVR-12 Major Transportation Accidents
HVR-13 Major Industrial Accidents
HVR-14 Terrorism & Human-made Disasters
HVR-15 Reintegration of Ex-combatants

Chapter 4: Tsunami and Multi-hazard Early Warning System

xii

i n

4.1

Key issues

4.2

StrategyS r i L a n k a

R o a d

M a p

4.3

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Project Proposals
E-1

Establishment of the National Early Warning Centre of Sri Lanka

E-2

Improvement of Meteorological Observation and Prediction Capabilities

E-3

Improvement of Hydrometric Network for Enhancing
Flood Monitoring and Forecasting Capabilities

E-4

Improvement of Landslide Prediction and Early Warning Capabilities

E-5

Development of Long and Medium Term Drought Forecasting andMonitoring System for Agriculture and Associated Sectors

E-6

Development of an Effective Cyclone Tracking,Storm Surge Warning System

E-7

Development of a Unified Seismic Monitoring and Data

E-8

Early Warning for Hazards Associated with Major Dams

E-9

Development of Oceanographic Monitoring System

E-10

Establishment of an EWS for Nuclear Accidents andMonitoring of Environmental Radiation
Erecting Tsunami Warning Towers in Selected Coastal Areas

E-11

Chapter 5: Preparedness and Response Plans
5.1

Key issues

5.2

Strategy`

5.3

Project Proposals
PR-1 Hazard Specific Response Plans
PR-1.1PR-1.2PR-1.3PR-1.4PR-1.5PR-1.6

Cyclone and Tornado Response Plan
Drought Response Plan
Flood Response Plan
Tsunami Response Plan
Landslides Response Plan
Lightning and Thunderstorms Response Plan

PR-2 National Rapid Response Team
PR-3 Emergency Operation Centres (EOCs)
PR-4 Hazard Specific Contingency Plans
PR-5 Emergency Service Networks (ESNs)
PR-6 Knowledge Management Systems
PR-7 Health Sector Preparedness and Response Mechanismxiii

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

PR-8 Private Sector Preparedness for Disaster Response
PR-9 National Radiological and Nuclear Emergency Management Plan
PR-10 Capacity Building of Local Authorities for Emergency Response
PR-11 Provision of Facilities for Storage of Emergency Reserves andResource Needs
PR-12 Construction of Multi-purpose Buildings for use as Tsunami Safe
Shelters and Other Purposes along the Coastal Zone
PR-13 Improvement of Mortuaries in Government Hospitals
PR-14 Establishment of Nationwide Emergency Communication System
PR-15 Search and Rescue in Disasters by Sri Lanka Army
PR-16 Strengthening Responses to Oil Pollution, Flood Relief
Operations and Enhancing SAR capabilities at Sea
PR-17 Provision of Aircraft for Disaster Management Operations
Chapter 6: Mitigation and Integration of Disaster Risk Reduction into
Development Planning

xiv

6.1

Key issues

6.2

Strategy

6.3

Project Proposals
M-1

Mitigation and Stabilisation of Slopes in High Risk
Landslide and Rock Fall Sites

M-2

Flood Protection of Major Cities in Kalu Ganga Basin

M-3

Disaster Mitigation Action Plans

M-4

Integrating DIA into All Development Plans
M-4.1

Integration of Disaster Impact Assessment (DIA)
in the Approval Process of Development Projects

M-4.2

Structural Provisions for Mainstreaming DRM as a
Component of Development

M-5

National Land Use & Physical Planning Policy

M-6

Coastal Zone Management
M-6.1

Integration of Disaster Risk Considerations in
Coastal Zone Management (CZM) policy

M-6.2

Natural Barrier along the CoastR o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

M-7 Development Controls, Building Bye-laws
M-8 Housing, Education, Tourism, Infrastructure Facilities
M-8.1

Mitigation Measures in Housing Schemes,
Industrial Estates, Tourist Hotels

M-8.2

Reducing Disaster Risk Vulnerability ofHigh Voltage Towers, Communication Towers

M-8.3

Planning and Construction of Schools and Hospitals
in Hazard Prone Areas to Higher Standards ofHazard Resilience

M-8.4

Reducing Disaster Risk Vulnerability around Gas,
Fuel and Chemical Storage Facilities

M-8.5

Providing Safer Critical Infrastructure in
Hazard Prone Areas

M-9 Drought Mitigation in Selected Districts
M-10 Enhancing Dam Safety
M-11 Risk Transfer Mechanisms
M-12 Research and Development in Disaster Risk Reduction
M-13 Reducing Health Risk due to Polluted Ground Water
M-14 Construction of By-pass Road Down-stream of Kantale Dam
M-15 Drinking Water for Drought Affected Divisions of Hambantota
and other Districts through Desalinisation
M-16 Provision of Incinerators as a Solution to Solid Waste Disposal
Chapter 7: Community-based Disaster Risk Management
7.1

Key issues

7.2

Strategy

7.3

Project Proposals
CBDM-1

Promotion of CBDRM Volunteerism

CBDM-2

Establishing CBDM Resource Centres

CBDM-3

Preparedness and Mitigation through Small Grants Programmes

CBDM-4Development and Implementation of Micro-Finance Schemes

CBDM-5National CBDRM Programme

CBDM-6

Applied Research Grant Scheme for CBDRM
xv

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

CBDM-7

Land mines and Unexploded Ordnances (UXO)

CBDM-8

Alternative and Informal Dispute Resolution Mechanisms andImproving Services from State Actors

CBDM-9

Facilitation of the creation of local citizens committees

CBDM-10 Strengthening Participatory Democracy-local Government
CBDM-11 Creating a Special Disaster Response Ombudsmen
CBDM-12 Issues of Subsidiarity in Situations of Emergency
CBDM-13 Strengthening Human Rights in Tsunami Recovery

Chapter 8: Public Awareness, Education and Training
8.1

Key issues

8.2

Strategy

8.3

Project Proposals
PA-1

Awareness through Disaster Safety Day

PA-2

National Public Awareness Programme

PA-3

Awareness through Schools and School Children

PA-3.1 Integration of DRM into School Curriculum
PA-3.2 School Children Awareness Programme
PA-4 Awareness through University Curriculum and Continuing Education
PA-4.1 Integration of DM in Graduate and Post-graduate
Curriculum in University Education
PA-4.2 Awareness by Integrating DM Training in Continuing Education
PA-5 Training for Government Employees
PA-6 Training for Emergency Preparedness and Response
PA-7 Enhancing Training Capacities
PA-8 Special Awareness Programmes
PA-9 Nationwide Awareness Campaign on Public Safetyxvi

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Chapter 9: Implementation Arrangements
9.1

Introduction

9.2

Implementation Arrangements

9.3

9.2.1

National Steering Committee

9.2.2

Technical Advisory Committee

9.2.3

Implementing Bodies

9.2.4

Financial Management

Monitoring and Evaluation

Annexes
Annex 1:Gazette of the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights

Annex 2:

Sri Lanka Disaster Management Act., No.13 of 2005

Annex 3:

Road Map Working GroupsxviiR o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aAcronyms
ADPC
ADRC
AEA
APELL
ARTI
BOI
CBDM
CBDRM
CBOs
CCD
CDPA
CEA
CEB
CECB
CHPB
CPC
DEM
DIA
DM
DMC
DoA
DoM
DRM
DRR
DSs
EOC
ERD
ESNs
EW
EWS
FEMA
GCE (AL)
GIS
GN
GO
GSMB
xviii

Asian Disaster Preparedness Center
Asian Disaster Reduction Centre
Atomic Energy Authority
Awareness and Preparedness for Emergencies at Local Levels
Agrarian Research Training Institute
Board of Investment
Community based Disaster Management
Community based Disaster Risk Management
Community Based Organizations
Coast Conservation Department
Central Data Processing and Archiving Unit
Central Environmental Authority
Ceylon Electricity Board
Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau
Centre for Housing Planning and Building
Ceylon Petroleum Corporation
Digital Elevation Model
Disaster Impact Assessment
Disaster Management
Disaster Management Centre
Department of Agriculture
Department of Meteorology
Disaster Risk Management
Disaster Risk Reduction
Divisional Secretariats
Emergency Operation Centre
External Resources Department
Emergency Service Networks
Early Warning
Early Warning System
Federal Emergency Management Agency
General Certificate of Education (Advanced Level)
Geographic Information System
Grama Niladhari
Government Organization
Geological Survey and Mines BureauR o a d

GTS
IAEA
ICTAD
ID
IDB
IESL
IOC
ISDR
ITI
LA
LG
LGAs
LIDAR
LHZ
LSSD
M&E
MASL
MC
MDTC
MDTU
M/FAR
M/DM&HR
MoDM
MRI
MoE
MoH
NARA
NBRO
NDMC
NEOC
NGOs
NHDA
NIE
NISD
NPPD
NSF
NWS&DB
PCs

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Global Telecommunications System
International Atomic Energy Agency
Institute for Construction, Training and Development
Irrigation Department
Industrial Development Board
Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission
International Strategy for Disaster Reduction
Industrial Technology Institute
Local Authority
Local Government
Local Government Authorities
Light Detection and Ranging
Landslide Hazard Zoning
Landslide Studies and Services Division
Monitoring and Evaluation
Mahaweli Authority of Sri Lanka
Municipal Council
Management Development & Training Centres
Material Development & Training Unit
Ministry of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources
Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights
Ministry of Disaster Management
Medical Research Institute
Ministry of Education
Ministry of HealthNational Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency
National Building Research Organization
National Disaster Management Centre
National Emergency Operation Centre
Non Government Organizations
National Housing Development Authority
National Institute of Education
National Institute of Social Development
National Physical Planning Department
National Science Foundation
National Water Supply & Drainage Board
Provincial Councils
xix

R o a d

PCLG
PRDA
PS
RDA
RER
RS
S&M
SAR
SCADA
SLIA
SLIDA
SLILG
SLLRDCSLRCSSLUMDMP
SoPs
ToR
TOT
TRC
UC
UDA
UGC
UNDP
UNESCO
USAID
USGS
WMO
WRB

xx

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aProvincial Council Local Government
Provincial Road Development Authority
Pradeshiya Sabha
Road Development Authority
Radiological Emergency Response
Remote Sensing
Surveillance & Monitoring
Search and Rescue
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
Sri Lanka Institute of Architects
Sri Lanka Institute of Development Administration
Sri Lanka Institute of Local Governance
Sri Lanka Land Reclamation and Development Corporation
Sri Lanka Red Cross Society
Sri Lanka Urban Multi-hazards Disaster Mitigation Project
Standard Operating Procedures
Terms of ReferenceTraining of Trainers
Telecommunications Regulatory Commission
Urban Council
Urban Development Authority
University Grants Commission
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
United States Agency for International Development
United States Geological Survey
World Meteorological Organisation
Water Resources BoardR o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Executive Summary
Over the past few decades, disaster losses in Sri Lanka have increased substantially. The country isprone to natural disasters caused by floods, cyclones, landslides, drought and coastal erosion withincreasing instances of environmental pollution related hazards. The devastation caused by the
Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004 has highlighted that Sri Lanka is also vulnerable to low-frequency,
high impact events which cause extensive damage and reverse years of development gains.
Over the last year, the Government of Sri Lanka has taken significant steps towards strengthening
legislative and institutional arrangements for disaster risk management. The Sri Lankan
Parliament Select Committee on Natural Disaster, a bi-partisan committee, was constituted todeliberate on issues relating to the status of disaster management in Sri Lanka. The Committee's
recommendations towards achieving a safer Sri Lanka have subsequently guided legislative andpolicy efforts in this regard.
In May 2005, the Sri Lanka Disaster Management Act No.13 of 2005 was enacted, which provides
the legal basis for instituting a Disaster Risk Management (DRM) system in the country. The Act
establishes the National Council for Disaster Management (NCDM) and the Disaster
Management Centre (DMC). The NCDM chaired by H.E. the President, vice-chaired by the Hon.
Prime Minister with participation of the Leader of Opposition, Ministers, Provincial Council Chief
Ministers and five members of the Opposition, provided direction to DRM in the country. In
November 2005, the Ministry of Disaster Management (MoDM) was established under the Hon.
Prime Minister. In January 2006, the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights(M/DM&HR) was created as a separate Ministry with NCDM and DMC gazetted under its
purview. It has been accorded the lead role in directing the strategic planning process for disasterprevention, mitigation, response and recovery.
After the tsunami, the need to coordinate efforts of various government agencies and the offers of
support by international agencies in the area of DRM both for natural and human-made disasters
has been recognised. A comprehensive DRM framework for Sri Lanka will unify the efforts of allagencies working in various sectors across all regions and levels of development activity. The
DMC has prepared such a framework to identify and coordinate multi stakeholder efforts in thenext 10 years through a holistic strategy or 'Road Map' towards building a safer Sri Lanka.
Consultations with provincial and district administrations of Hambantota, Ampara and Kandy
have gone towards enriching the various proposals presented. This Road Map is focused on seventhematic components which are consistent with ongoing and past efforts in the field of disaster risk
management and development planning, and as in the Hyogo Framework ofAction 2005-2015:
Policy, Institutional Mandates, and Institutional Development
Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Assessment
Tsunami & Multi- hazard Early Warning Systems
Preparedness and Response Plansxxi

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Mitigation and Integration of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) into Development Planning
Community-based Disaster Risk Management
Public Awareness, Education and Training
Proposals for projects under each of the seven components, with details of agencies involved, timeframe, budget requirements, and outputs, are presented in Chapters 2 through 8. Implementation
arrangements for the Road Map are discussed in Chapter 9.
These components have been developed through a consultative process which has helped in theidentification of gaps, needs, priorities and strategies for further action. These consultations
included the district level meetings of the Minister and other consultations with civil society.
Priority areas for immediate action have been identified by working groups to address them in asystematic and prioritized manner with the requisite collaboration of relevant stakeholder
agencies, departments and ministries in Sri Lanka. These priorities for action are consistent with
the Sri Lanka Disaster ManagementAct No.13 of 2005, and also in line with the Hyogo Framework
forAction 2005-2015, which this Road Map will work towards implementing over the next decade.

xxii

Chapter 1
Introduction to the Road Map
for a 'Safer Sri Lanka'

1.1

Key Objectives

In the aftermath of the tsunami there has been a renewed attempt to institutionalize a Disaster
Risk Management (DRM) framework in Sri Lanka. The need has been felt to complement theongoing policy and legislative efforts with risk identification and reduction strategies. National
and local level institutions must be strengthened while paying due attention to Community-based
Disaster Risk Management (CBDRM). While formulating national and provincial level actionplans for poverty alleviation and infrastructure development, there is also a need to consider thedifferent kinds of hazard risks and vulnerabilities across the country. This will enable thestrengthening of local and national governance structures as well as emphasize national andcommunity-based environmental resource management for long-term risk reduction.
In acknowledging these present needs, the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights(M/DM&HR) proposes a comprehensive framework which will identify and coordinate multiple
stakeholder efforts in the next 10 years through a holistic strategy or 'Road Map' towards building a'Safer Sri Lanka'. The plan will be implemented by identifying 'priority projects' across different
areas for action.

1.2

The Consultative Process

The Road Map is broadly focused on seven thematic components which are consistent withongoing and past efforts in the field of DRM and development planning in Sri Lanka. The strategy
proposed by the DRM framework seeks to cover the following areas:
Policy, Institutional Mandates and Institutional Development
Hazard, Vulnerability and RiskAssessment1

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Tsunami and Multi-hazard Early Warning System
Planning for Disaster Preparedness and Response
Disaster Mitigation and Integration into Development Planning
Community-based Disaster Risk Management (CBDRM), andPublicAwareness, Education and Training
These components have been developed through a consultative process for the identification ofgaps, needs, priorities and strategies for implementation. The strategies and priorities forparticular projects have been developed by Working Groups comprising of multiple stakeholders
representing relevant agencies from all sectors involved in DRM. The resulting conclusions andpriorities for action have been made consistent with the DM Act. The framework will work
towards implementing the provisions of this Act, in collaboration with all relevant stakeholder
agencies over the next 10 years. Detailed consultations with various stakeholders have been
engaged in, facilitated by the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights in the districtsof Hambantota, Ampara and Kandy, in addition to discussions with other national level
stakeholders, including the Police andArmed Forces.

1.3 Components of the Road Map
The Road Map is focused on seven thematic components which are consistent with ongoing andpast efforts in the field of DRM and development planning. The strategy proposed by the DRM
framework for Sri Lanka will cover the following areas:
1.3.1

Policy, Institutional Mandates and Institutional Development including components
like preparation of a national disaster management plan ,a national policy for DM, anational emergency response plan, reviewing, formalising mandates and identifying
capacity development needs of agencies to perform their DM functions as well as steps to
implement policies already in place.

1.3.2

Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Assessment comprising activities ranging from flood
simulation modelling in key river basins to the development of a vulnerability atlas for Sri
Lanka. This will enable development planning which is sensitive to multiple hazards anddifferent kinds of vulnerabilities.

1.3.3

Tsunami and Multi-hazard Early Warning System incorporating elements to generateadvance warnings for floods, cyclones, abnormal rainfall, droughts, landslides, thus
enabling decision-makers to take necessary measures well before the occurrence of adisaster.

2

R o a d

1.3.4

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Preparedness and Response Plans to minimise the adverse impacts of a hazard througheffective precautionary actions and timely, adequate responses. Prioritised activities
include development of a national emergency preparedness and response plan, andestablishment of emergency operation centres at national, provincial, district and local
authority levels..

1.3.5

Mitigation and Integration of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) into Development Planningencompassing activities relating to reducing impacts of droughts, preventing floods andlandslides, and providing protection against storm surges, sea and coastal flooding by
incorporating disaster risk considerations in development plans, thus ensuring sustainable
development.

1.3.6 Community-based Disaster Risk Management (CBDRM), involving activities thatrecognize the fact that communities, even when affected, are still the first line of defence
against disasters if they are well prepared. Interventions proposed include mobilization ofcommunity teams, creation of a local network of trained volunteers and establishment of
resource centres and small grants to fund priority projects by community teams.
1.3.7

Public Awareness, Education and Training focusing on empowering the public with ways
and means to reduce disaster losses, and includes a national awareness campaign,designating a 'National Disaster Safety Day', promoting disaster awareness amongprofessionals through integration in university curricula and training, and among children
through integration in school curriculum and school awareness programmes.

These components are elaborated in the next few chapters along with the project proposals forvarious activities under each of these components.

3

4

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Chapter 2
Policy, Institutional Mandates andInstitutional Development

2.1

Key Issues

The objective of this component is to establish a culture of safety against disasters through policy
support and strengthening of institutional mandates and capacities. To ensure a coordinatedapproach to risk reduction and disaster preparedness, individual institutions have to perform inaccordance with their current mandates while also taking on additional responsibilities. This might
require formulating legislations and developing institutional capacities in priority areas acrossvarious levels.
To achieve this, the projects under this component will broadly focus on:
Development of a national policy on DM
Enhancing capabilities through policy support and institutional development ofDisaster Management Centre (DMC), the focal point for DM in Sri Lanka
Enhancing capabilities through policy support and institutional developmentof all relevant agencies for DM in Sri Lanka-

Promote durable solutions for peace and greater involvement of public in shaping
national policies and legislation-

Strengthening human rights, particularly of women, migrant workers, children andother disadvantaged groups

2.2 Strategy
i. Implementing Provisions of the Sri Lanka DM Act:
Sri Lanka has enacted a number of policies, ordinances and legislations that have had a bearing on
DRM and associated issues. The recent Sri Lanka DM Act provides a strong footing for5R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k acoordinating all such ordinances and legislations with the relevant ministries and agencies. The
strategy involves developing a National Policy on Disaster Management, a National Disaster
Management Plan and a National Emergency Response Plan through a consultative process andestablishing a National Disaster ManagementAdvisory Committee.
ii. Reviewing and Formalising Institutional Mandates:
In the current set up, line agencies perform various functions under their respective mandates,
and DRM is just one of their many responsibilities. National Building Research Organization(NBRO), Geological Survey and Mines Bureau (GSMB), the Department of Agriculture (DoA),
are some examples of agencies which do not have mandates for the scope of activities theypresently handle. As a result, there are gaps and many DRM-related activities do not receive
attention. The DMC has to strengthen the mandates of these institutions and bring them together
to work in a coordinated manner. DM plans of these different agencies should conform to the
National DM Plan and the Emergency Operation Plan of the DMC. In addition, the DMC will
support provincial and local government (LG) set-up to develop similar plans and increase theirdisaster response capability.
iii. Institutional Mandates, Capacities Developed:
There is also an urgent need to develop the mandates and capacities of some institutions involved in DRM.
Acase in point is the Landslide Studies and Services Division (LSSD). It was established under the NBRO
to provide services for human settlements planning and the construction sector. However in the last 10-15
years the functional requirement of the LSSD has changed considerably. It is necessary to review it under
the present DM framework in order to meet the current and future challenges of landslide risk mitigation in
Sri Lanka. It should be granted wider responsibility and mandate, exceeding the simple functional
responsibilities of a research organization to help it efficiently undertake mitigation, preparedness,
identification of disasters, recovery and rehabilitation of landslide prone areas. If deemed necessary, LSSD
could be restructured as a separate agency under the M/DM&HR, so as to take on the functional
responsibilities of design and control of mountain development activities (similar to the Sri Lanka Land
Reclamation and Development Corporation or SLLRDC).
In addition to formalising new mandates, capacities to implement these mandates need to be
developed on a priority basis. Developing capacities will include support to the DMC's role as thelead agency for DRM and emergency operations in the country. The DMC will require resources
and infrastructure support to execute its newly established mandate. Furthermore the disaster
response capacities, especially those concerning search and rescue/ fire fighting are limited to only
certain pockets in Sri Lanka, and are dependent on the limited resources available with local
authorities. In response, the M/DM&HR would need to enhance these resources to strengthen thepresent capacities.
One of the key priorities of the Ministry is the establishment under one roof of the Disaster
Management Centre, the National Tsunami Early Warning Centre; the National Multi-Hazard
Early Warning Centre; the 24x7 Emergency Operations Centre; and the Risk Assessment, Data
Collection,Analysis and Research Centre. This is being treated as a national priority.
6R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Iv. CBDRM Policy:
Well-prepared communities are the first line of defence against disasters and a key to reducing
vulnerability and increasing disaster resilience. Having a well-resourced and sustainable
programme to advance CBDRM is therefore a key strategy to achieve a safer Sri Lanka. This canbe facilitated by institutionalizing the CBDRM process at the grass-roots level, in activities of thedifferent line agencies. This can be supplemented by the involvement of NGOs.
v. Incorporation in National Planning Policies:
Disaster Risk Assessment is not always considered in project formulation stages at present, hence
posing a challenge to mainstreaming DRR efforts. Integrating DRM in National Planning Policies
will make Disaster Risk Assessment mandatory for agencies in formulating and approving
projects.
vii. Promote Durable Solutions for Peace
A mechanism for truth and reconciliation could contribute towards a durable political solution to
the conflict in Sri Lanka. There is a need to carry out research on the applicability of such amechanism in the Sri Lankan context. Furthermore, fostering better understanding between
religious and ethnic communities by celebrating and respecting diversity can also help to promote
peace.
viii. Promoting Greater Involvement of the Public in Shaping National Policies, Legislation andEnhancing Accountability
There is a need for greater involvement of the public in policy making to ensure that citizens arewell informed and can contribute constructively to public debate, allowing them to influence andshape decision that will affect their lives. The creation of a freedom of information regime would
also contribute significantly to enhancing public debate and fostering accountability.
xi. Strengthening Human Rights, Particularly of Women, Migrant Workers, Children and Other
Disadvantaged Groups
There is a need for greater constitutional guarantees for human rights and this can be achieved bystrengthening the chapter on fundamental rights in the Constitution, promoting the implementationof the Women's Charter and studying the possibility and implications of enfranchising migrant
workers in the country.

2.3

Project Proposals

The following projects are being prioritised in the short to medium term due to their relevanceto the policy and institutional context in Sri Lanka:
P-1
Implementation of Provisions of DMAct
7

R o a d

M a p

f o r

P-2

P-7
P-8

Reviewing Institutional Mandates
P-2.1 Reviewing Institutional Mandates for Provincial Councils & Local
Government Agencies to Perform Disaster Related Activities
P-2.2 Reviewing Institutional Mandates for Line Agencies to Perform Disaster
Related Activities
Developing Institutional Mandates and Capacities
Formulation of CBDRM Policy
Enforcement of Policies
Establishment of the National Centre Building housing the DMC, Risk
Assessment, Data Collection, Research and Analysis Centre, Tsunami Warning
Centre, Multi-Hazard Warning Centre and National Emergency Operations Centre
Facilitating the Reconciliation Process
Good Governance and the Law-making Process

P-9
P-10
P-11
P-12
P-13
P 14

Strengthening Human Rights: Constitutional Reform
Strengthening Human Rights: Making Laws More Effective
Strengthening Women's Rights
Voting Rights of Migrant Workers
Issues Pertaining to a Durable Peace in Sri Lanka
Encouraging Good Governance within the Ministry

P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6

8

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

R o a d

P-1

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Implementation of Provisions of DM Act

Agencies involved:
DMC and NCDM with guidance from Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights, andother relevant agencies; UNDP

Background and Rationale:
In May 2005, the Government of Sri Lanka passed the Sri Lanka DM Act No 13 of 2005 in the
Parliament. It provides a strong footing for bringing together provisions of all existing Acts whichhave a bearing on DM and related issues. This Act provides a framework for DRM in Sri Lanka,
addresses DM holistically, leading to a policy shift from response based mechanisms to a proactive
approach and provides for the establishment of an institutional and legislative framework for DRM.
DMC will be the lead agency on DRM in the country. In November 2005, the Ministry of Disaster
Management was established, which has from January 2006 been renamed as Ministry of Disaster
Management and Human Rights, with Hon. Mahinda Samarasinghe, as Minister . DMC functions
under this Ministry. DM needs a multi-disciplinary, multi-sectoral and multi-level approach foreffective implementation. With this in view the NCDM under M/DM&HR includes ministers incharge of 20 subject areas, namely, Social Services, Rehabilitation & Reconstruction, Home
Affairs, Health, Science & Technology, Housing, Coast Conservation, Irrigation, Power, Defence,
Police, Finance, Land, Fisheries & Aquatic Resources, Foreign Affairs, Water Supply, Highways,
Urban Development, Education and Environment. The multi-disciplinary and multi-sectoral
approach is all the more justifiable owing to the broad range of hazards covered in the Act, namely,
Floods, Landslides, Industrial Hazards, Tsunami (Seismic Wave), Earthquakes, Air Hazards, Fire,
Epidemics, Explosions, Air Raids, Civil or Internal Strife, Chemical Accidents, Radiological
Emergency, Oil Spills, Nuclear Disaster, Urban and Forest Fire, Coastal Erosion, Tornadoes,
Lightening Strikes and Severe Thunder Storms.
Many of the provisions of the DM Act are not yet properly understood by the various institutions
involved in different phases of the DRM cycle. Hence there is a need for the DMC to explain theseprovisions to involved agencies and plan out its activities properly and by formulating a national
policy on DRM and preparing the National DM Plan for Sri Lanka.

Objective
To implement the provisions of the Sri Lanka DMAct, No.13, 2005
9

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aTime frame of implementation:
Year 1-5 (2006-2010) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities:
a. Develop a national policy on DM through a consultative processb. Develop a national disaster management plan, national emergency response plan througha consultative processc. Constitute technical committees as appropriate representing various DM practitioners,
professionals, academics, NGOs, development agencies etc.
d. Study the recommendations given in the Report of the Parliamentary Select Committee
and other relevant documents and reports
e. Initiate necessary preliminaries such as circulars with guidelines regarding preparation of
DM plans at national, ministry and agency level as required

Outputs:
National policy on DM prepared
National DM Plan, National Emergency Response Plan for Sri Lanka preparedTechnical Committees Established
Expert Group established
Preliminaries such as circulars with guidelines regarding preparation of
DM plans at national, ministry and agency level as required initiated

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 75 mi (USD 0.75 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 75 mi (USD 0.75 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Secretary, M/DM&HR
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
ParticipatingAgencies - Respective DM line ministries and agencies
10R o a d

P-2.1

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Reviewing Institutional Mandates for Line Agencies to
Perform Disaster Related Activities

Agencies involved:
DMC, Respective DM line ministries and agencies

Background and Rationale:
Currently line agencies perform various functions under their mandates, and DRM is just one of
their many responsibilities. NBRO, GSMB and DoA are some examples of the agencies which do
not have mandates for the scope of activities they handle.
Initially Landslide Studies and Services Division (LSSD) was established under NBRO to provide
services for human settlements planning and the construction sector. During the last 10-15 years
the functional requirement of the LSSD has increased considerably. It is necessary to review it
under the present DM framework to meet the present and future challenges of landslide risk
mitigation in Sri Lanka.
The agricultural sector is often affected by hazards, especially drought, but agriculture is notincluded in the list of subjects in Clause 3 (1) (d) of the DM Act. Furthermore, there is no leadagency responsible for mitigation of drought hazard in Sri Lanka.
As a result of the above there are gaps and many activities relating to DRM do not necessarily
receive adequate attention in these line agencies.

Objectives:
To review, strengthen and provide hazard-specific institutional mandates for line agencies toperform or support relevant disaster related activities

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country11R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
a. Appoint a sub committee to study and review institutional mandates of line agencies
b. Identify relevant functions which are not assigned to any institutions
c. Identify institutions without appropriate mandates to function in various capacities
d. Address the gaps in institutional functions through provision of mandate by issue ofappropriate gazette notifications or legislative steps
e. Introduce responsibility and accountability for assigned function

Outputs:
Institutional mandates for relevant line agencies established or clarified
New regulations enacted as needed

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 1 mi (USD 0.01 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 1 mi (USD 0.01 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
Participating agencies : Respective DM line ministries and agencies

12R o a d

P-2.2

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Reviewing Institutional Mandates for Provincial
Councils and Local Government Agencies to
Perform Disaster Related Activities

Agencies involved:
DMC, Guidance from NCDM

Background and Rationale:
There is a concern that disaster response capacities, especially those concerning search and rescue/fire fighting, emergency health facilities are limited to only certain pockets in Sri Lanka, and also
have to depend on the limited resources available with local authorities. In response, the DMC
would need to enhance these resources to strengthen the present capacities.
Currently Provincial Councils (PCs), various Provincial Agencies and local authorities (LAs)perform various functions related to DRM. However they do not have mandates for carrying out
some of the activities they handle during and after a disaster. As a result there are gaps and many
activities relating to DRM do not necessarily receive adequate attention. There is a need for the
DMC to strengthen the mandates of these PCs and LAs and to bring them together to work in acoordinated manner. DM plans of these different agencies should conform to the National DM
Plan and the Emergency Operation Plan of the DMC.
Various DM activities must encompass the Provincial and LG set-up, with support extended by the
DMC and other national level institutions. Their capacities on disaster response are limited andhence it is necessary to strengthen their capacities.

Objectives:
To review, strengthen and provide hazard-specific institutional mandates for PCs and LG agencies
to perform or support relevant disaster related activities

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country13R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
a. Engange suitable consultant to study this aspectb. Identify and address the gaps in institutional functions of PCs and LG agencies throughprovision of mandatec. Legislative steps or regulations as appropriate
d. Introduce responsibility and accountability for assigned function

Outputs:
Institutional Mandates for PCs and LG agencies established or clarified to perform or
support relevant disaster related activities established

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 10 mi (USD 0.10 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 10 mi (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

14

R o a d

P-3

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Developing Institutional Mandates and Capacities

Agencies involved:
DMC, Respective DM line ministries and agencies

Background and Rationale:
There is a concern that disaster management capacities of various institutions are not adequate andhave to depend on the limited resources available. In response, the DMC needs to enhance theseresources to strengthen the present capacities.
There are gaps in the mandates of LSSD of the NBRO to handle present DM activities meeting thepresent and future challenges of landslide risk mitigation in Sri Lanka. If deemed necessary,through a gazette notification, LSSD should be restructured as a separate agency under the
M/DM&HR with a wider responsibility and mandate, exceeding mere functional responsibilities
of a research organisation to undertake mitigation, preparedness, EW, recovery and rehabilitationof landslide prone areas. The services have to be expanded to cover additional areas of vulnerability
reduction and recovery of landslide affected areas amongst others.
A policy recommendation is to include agriculture in the list of subjects in Clause 3 (1) (d) of the
Act by gazette notification, and designate drought risk mitigation as a functional responsibility of
the Ministry of Agriculture / Department of Agriculture/ Department of Agrarian Services, as in
Section 21(1) of theAct, followed by a gazette notification as given in clause 21(4) of theAct.
There is a need for DMC to strengthen the mandates of these institutions and to bring them together
to work in a coordinated manner. This is also a requirement for the national policy to be developed
under the Sri Lanka DM Act. DM plans of these different agencies should conform to the National
DM Plan and the Emergency Operation Plan of the DMC. In addition, these plans have toencompass the Provincial and LG set-up, with support extended by the DMC and other national
level institutions. Their capacities on disaster response are limited and require strengthening.
DMC needs capacity enhancement in the form of trained personnel and other facilities.

Objectives:
Institutional capacities corresponding to new mandates developed
Roles and responsibilities of various agencies clarified

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term
15

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aYear 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term
Year 6-10 (2011-2015) - Long term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities:
a. Development of institutional framework for ministries, departments, agencies andnational & International NGOs to function corresponding to new mandates provided toPCs, LG agencies, DM line agencies
b. Identification of needs and gaps in manpower, equipment and officesc. Training and capacity building of sections/divisions in the respective organizations
dedicated to function as DM line agencies
d. Institutionalised cooperation and coordination structures facilitated as needed
e. Enhancing the capacity of DMC having trained personnel, a Head Office Building withan Emergency Operation Centre (EOC), communication and other necessary facilities

Outputs:
Institutional capacities corresponding to new mandates developed
Roles and responsibilities of various agencies clarified
Capacity of DMC developed for emergency operations and as lead agency for DRM

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 50 mi (USD 0.5 mi)Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 50 mi (USD 0.5 mi)Year 6-10 (2011-2015) - SLR 50 mi (USD 0.5 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 150 mi (USD1.5 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
16

R o a d

P-4

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Formulation of CBDRM Policy

Agencies involved:
DMC, Respective DM line agencies, SLRCS, NGOs and CBOs

Background and Rationale:
Well prepared and protected communities are the first line of defence against disasters and a key toreducing vulnerability and increasing disaster resilience. Having a well resourced and sustainable
programme to advance CBDRM is therefore a key strategy to achieve a safer Sri Lanka. It will benecessary to involve the communities at risk in processes of DRM, as they have to cope and livewith risks on a daily/continual basis. This can be facilitated by institutionalising the CBDRM
process at the grass-roots level activities of line agencies and by involving NGOs.

Objectives:
Recognising CBDRM as a tool for risk reduction at local levels, especially for line
agencies and ministries
Enhancing the capacity of the community to play an active role in DRR

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities:
a. Recognise and provide legal basis for CBDRM groups at the village levelb. Clear linkage established and roles identified for Community DRM groups and NGOs
in DM plans at the Grama Niladhari (GN) Division, local authority, divisional anddistrict levels
c. Create National mechanism for coordination between DMC and NGOs in promoting
CBDRM
d. Development of common approaches and methodologies to CBDRM
e. Creation of registration system for disaster response volunteers17R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Outputs:
CBDRM recognised as a tool for risk reduction at local levels, especially for line agencies andministries and the capacity of the community to play an active role in DRR enhanced.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 15 million (USD 0.15 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 15 million (USD 0.15 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

18

R o a d

P-5

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Enforcement of Policies

Agencies involved:
DMC, Respective DM line ministries and agencies

Background and Rationale:
Disaster Risk Assessment is not always considered in project formulation stages at present
hence posing a challenge to mainstreaming DRR efforts. Especially considering the present
rapid development this is essential to ensure that the development does not create newhazardous conditions and environmental degradation, and also that prevailing disasters do
not adversely affect the new development. Integrating DRM in National Planning Policies
will make it mandatory for agencies formulating and approving projects avoiding suchpractices. Some examples are integration of DRR in the EIA process, in donor funded
development projects and infrastructure development projects of different sectors.

Objectives:
Optimise implementation of existing policies towards risk reduction
Enhance enforcement of relevant existing ordinances, acts, regulations

Time frame of implementation:
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities:
a. Review of existing ordinances, acts and regulations
b. Identify gaps and causes for inadequate enforcementc. Clarify and resolve areas of overlap or contradictiond. Develop capacities or resources needed as identified for effective enforcement

Outputs:
Implementation of existing policies towards risk reduction optimised
Enforcement of relevant existing ordinances, acts and regulations enhanced19

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Budget:Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 15 million (USD 0.15 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 15 million (USD 0.15 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

20

R o a d

P-6

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Establishment of the National Centre housing
DMC, Risk Assessment, Data Collection, Researchand Analysis Centre, Tsunami Warning Centre,
Multi-Hazard Warning Centre and24 x 7 National Emergency Operations Centre

Agencies involved:
DMC, Department of Meteorology (DoM), Irrigation Department, MASL, CEB, GSMB, NBRO,NWS&DB, others

Background and Rationale:
One of the key priorities of the Ministry under this Road Map is the establishment under one roof
the Disaster Management Centre, the National Tsunami Early Warning Centre; the National MultiHazard Early Warning Centre; the 24x7 Emergency Operations Centre; and the Risk Assessment,
Data Collection, Analysis and Research Centre. This is being treated as a national priority. A
2building in the Department of Meteorology Compound is proposed of approximately 4000 m offloor area.
This multi-purpose building will provide Sri Lanka with the wherewithal to link not just thenational level agencies involved in various phases of disaster management from warning to
response, but also linked to the Provinces, Districts, Divisions and local authorities. This National
Centre Building will be operational 24x7 and will also incorporate an emergency number (e.g. 911)
which any citizen can call for any type of assistance, round the clock. The Centre will be able to notjust provide appropriate advice through the personnel available, but also link up additional
resources, as necessary.
Construction of this National Centre Building will ensure that there is optimal utilization of
resources, since most of the communication and networking requirements would be used more
effectively. Further it will ensure that there is greater coordination and concerted efforts of alllevels of administrative and political strata to handle all aspects of the disaster management cyclefrom warning generation to dissemination to response and recovery.
1. Disaster Management Centre
The Disaster Management Centre, as the key focal point for managing and coordination of alldisaster management activities under the Ministry will coordinate with,- RiskAssessment, Data Collection, Research andAnalysis Centre- Tsunami and Multi-hazard Early Warning Centres- 24/7 Emergency Operation Centre21

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

2. RiskAssessment, Data Collection, Research andAnalysis Centre
In Sri Lanka, while a lot of information is available on natural hazards, relatively little is available
on disaster risks except for work done by NBRO on landslide hazard risks. A system needs to be
developed that systematically captures the existing and emerging patterns of disaster risk. The
National RiskAssessment, Data Collection, Research andAnalysis Centre would comprise:• Systematic data collection both nationally and internationally• Hazard mapping and Multi-hazard risk assessments• Risk information system• Inventory of past disaster impacts
3. National Tsunami Early Warning Centre
Sri Lanka as part of the Regional Tsunami Early Warning System is required to maintain a
National Tsunami Early Warning Centre.
This National Tsunami Early Warning Centre will be linked to all relevant international agencies
such as the Japan Meteorological Centre, Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre (Hawaii) and othernational EWCs of in particular regional countries as well as the Regional Tsunami Watch
Providers.
The National Tsunami Warning Centre thus needs to have up-to-date communication andnetworking equipment, to be effective. Once an earthquake of sizeable magnitude has occurred,
the NTWC will be involved in real-time monitoring through available networks and pro-actively
engage with the international and regional systems to confirm the presence of tsunami waves in theocean prior to issuing of warnings.
The warning dissemination mechanisms of the National Tsunami Warning Centre will be sharedwith the Multi-hazard Warning Centre. Hence, it will ensure that in addition to the 3 commonlyused modes of dissemination, the wireless radio network maintained by the Sri Lankan police isalso brought into play to pass the early warning onto the nearly 120 police stations along the coast.
The local police stations then will help the community to evacuate safely. Additional fail-safe
communication modes (radios, satellite phones etc) proposed in the future to link up different
administrative divisions of the country will also be incorporated into the TWC. The
Communication System also envisages coastal tsunami early warning towers like in Thailand tobe located.
4. Multi-Hazard Warning Centre
In Sri Lanka, issues with regard to weather related disasters are handled by the DoM while issues
related to seismological activities and ocean wave related activities are handled by GSMB and
NARA respectively. Similarly river flood activities are within the purview of Irrigation
22

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Department. Early warning for hazards associated with major dams will be handles by
Irrigation Department, Mahaweli Authority of Sri Lanka, Ceylon Electricity Board andNational Water Supply and Drainage Board. Early warning related to other natural and manmade hazards will be by different institutions. A good networking facility connecting all the
relevant institutions is vital for proper coordination during disasters, and the government has
identified the need to establish a multi hazard EW centre as a matter of urgency. This centre
has to communicate directly with international as well as related national agencies during
emergencies. Therefore, equipping this centre with state-of-the-art communication and otherfacilities is important.
It is suggested that a state-of-the-art Natural Disaster EW Centre be established at the premises of
the DoM at Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo.
5. Emergency Operations Centre
An Emergency operation Centre at the national level is an important pre-requisite for effective andcoordinated response to any emergency.
The Emergency Operation Centre will operate 24x7 and will coordinate all incident
information and resources for management. It will receive, analyze, and display information
about the incident to enable decision-making. The EOC will also find, prioritize, deploy, andtrack critical resources. It will enhance decision making, communication, collaboration, andcoordination. The EOC will be manned by the relevant stakeholders and coordinated by the
DMC.
This state-of-the art Emergency Operation Center (EOC) will have all necessary equipment withconference facilities and display systems. The EOC will comprise one full-fledged Operations
Room, one Control Room that is 24X7 operational and one Communication Room to manage allcommunication equipments (servers, switches, routers, GIS server, FAX and SMS server etc) andwill function as one composite unit.
This EOC will be linked to the Provinces, Districts, DS Divisions and local authorities with failsafe communication modes. This EOC will also incorporate an emergency number (ex: 911) which
any citizen can call for any type of assistance, round the clock. The Centre will be able to not justprovide appropriate advice through the personnel available, but also link up additional resources,
as necessary.
The proposed site of the building is in the premises of Department of Meteorology, where not onlyis sufficient land available, but the site is centrally located and easily accessible to the senioradministration of the Government.
23

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Objectives:
To facilitate timely and end-to-end actions from EW of potential disaster events to adequate
dissemination and communication, and response.

Time frame of implementation:
2006-2007: Short-term: Two years

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Establishment of the National Centre building at DoM premisesb. Study undertaken to cost the establishment of these centres
c. Improvement of communication and dissemination capacityd. Institutionalising of inter agency arrangements for national EW
e. Establishment of coordinating mechanism with agencies within/ outside Sri Lanka

Output:2

2

A4/5-storeyed building of approximately 4000 m (40,000 ft ) of floor area, housing the DMC andall above mentioned centres and adequate parking space in the premises of Department ofMeteorology. Essential facilities to include air conditioning, generators for alternative power
supply etc; Along with a fully functional and efficient multi-hazard EWS

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Total Budget- SLR 158 million (USD 1.58 mi)- SLR 158 million (USD 1.58 mi)

Funding status:
Local funding/International Funding; New Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73 Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
24

dgdmcsl@gmail.com

R o a d

P-7

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Facilitating the Reconciliation Process

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, and other relevant ministries, Political and Civil SocietyActors

Background and Rationale:
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission process in South Africa has aroused considerable
interest in Sri Lanka, and also generated a debate as to the merits and demerits of adopting a similar
process in Sri Lanka. An option would be to adopt a different mechanism but with a similar
objective. In Sri Lanka there are powerful constituencies who prefer the option of a blanket
amnesty for excesses committed by all parties involved in the conflict. This option may haveserious human rights implications, which need to be studied carefully.
The Ministry would facilitate a study and discussion on the issue, taking into consideration otherstate facilitated reconciliation activities including the 1983 Presidential Truth Commission and the
National Action Framework for Reconciliation formulated by the Office of the Commissioner
General for Relief, Rehabilitation and Reconciliation with civil society participation. The study
would examine the cultural and religious appropriateness of such a truth and reconciliation process,the impact it will have on a durable political solution and international human rights norms andstandards on the issue.
Another preliminary step would be to conduct a study to ascertain the potential for reconciliation
processes in the Sri Lankan conflict. The study could serve as a basis for and inform the design andplanning process of a reconciliation mechanism.

Objectives:
To assist the process of finding a durable solution to the conflict through a process of reconciliation
which will better ensure a sustainable peace and peaceful coexistence.

Time fame for implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) – Short term

Activities:
The study would involve a nationwide survey in order to ascertain the general public opinion onreconciliation. In addition to the general public, significant focus will be paid to interviewing25R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

individuals who have been victims of direct violence, including those who have suffered the loss offamily and friends, violence to person, forced displacement or attacks on property etc. as a result of
the conflict. Careful attention needs to be paid to issues such as ethnic, gender and youth
representation etc.
The public opinion survey will be supplemented by interviews with key informants including
political, religious and other individuals, which will provide a perspective on the willingness andinterests of influential actors towards reconciliation. A critical decision that will have to be madewill be the parameters of the study as to whether the focus of reconciliation will be to the civil war
only or include riots and violence preceding it.
Key themes, which could be examined, include:• Popular understanding of what reconciliation means• The need for a structured reconciliation process• Mechanisms for reconciliation: a South African-style Truth and Reconciliation••

Commission, a Circle Process like in East Timor etc the need for public hearings etc.
Justice and prosecution and willingness to grant amnesty
Reparations and compensation

Geographical areas of implementation:
The Entire Country

Output:••Astudy examining the appropriateness of, and potential for, a process of reconciliation
Apotential design plan for a future reconciliation process

Budget:Year 1- 2 (2006-2007)- SLR 30 mi (USD 0.30 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 30 mi (USD 0.30 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact persons in local and participating agencies
M/DM&HR -Secretary
Political and Civil SocietyActors
26

R o a d

P-8

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aGood Governance and the Law-Making Process

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministries of Constitutional Affairs, Justice, Media (for FOI Bill), Public
Administration; Secretariat of Parliament, Civil Society Groups,Advisors

Background and Rationale:
The Ministry proposes to work to initiate a series of reforms that will introduce viablemechanisms and practices to promote principles of good governance. These include public
consultation and engagement, stakeholder consultation, and greater accountability andtransparency in the law and policy making process. Recently a report commissioned by the WorldBank strongly supported the adoption of a Freedom of Information Act as a means to promoteaccountability and responsiveness in governance in the country. Some specific proposals tofacilitate these principles are suggested belowa) Procedures to ensure adequate public notice of, and information about, proposed
legislation.
b) The need for stakeholder consultation when laws and policies are designed/ developed. A
study of the stakeholder consultation process in Sweden will be useful in this regard.
c) The promotion of White/ Green Papers on important areas of law reform.
d) The introduction of a Freedom of Information Bill and a programme for the training of
public officials and the institutional reforms necessary for the changes in mindset andprocess that such legislation will require. A draft Freedom of Information Bill wasapproved by the Cabinet of Ministers in February 2004 after consultation with civilsociety. Political developments thereafter may have prevented the enactment of the Bill.
A study should be commissioned to ascertain to what extent these practices formed part of Sri
Lanka’s democratic tradition since independence, a critical assessment of the present law andpolicy making processes and options for reform to promote principles of good governance.

Objectives:
Greater public and stakeholder involvement in law and policy-making will ensure better quality
legislation and also promote public discussion and debate, which will help develop better
informed citizens.

27

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aTime frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) Short Term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:--

Critically review the present lawmaking process
Study international best practice with respect to stakeholder consultation and Freedom ofInformation Bills
Study the changes that will be required in the Establishments Code, other governmental
procedures and practices in order to facilitate the introduction of a Freedom of Information
regimeTrain public servants on the implications of a Freedom of Information regime
Equip governmental departments and agencies for adequate responses to a Freedom ofInformation regime

Outputs:-

Standard setting for law/policy making
Promotion of principles of good governance
Strengthening of Parliament and democratic institutions

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Total Budget- SLR 30mi (USD 0.30mi)- SLR 30 mi (USD 0.30mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR -Secretary
Ministries of Constitutional Affairs, Justice, Media (for FOI Bill), Public Administration;
Secretariat of Parliament, Civil Society Groups,Advisors28

R o a d

P-9

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aStrengthening Human Rights: Constitutional Reform

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministries of Constitutional Affairs and Justice; Faculty of Law, University ofColombo, Civil Society groups

Background and Rationale:
A rights-based approach to development, disaster management and conflict resolution ensuresthat individuals and groups are the focus of initiatives and responses, policies and laws. Respect
and concern for human rights should therefore permeate the programmes and projects of the
Ministry. In recent years, civil society and academia have highlighted several deficiencies in thenational human rights regime. These need to be addressed. The 1994-2000 debate on a new
constitution provided an opportunity for serious debate and reflection on issues of effective
enforcement, access to justice, the need to affirm domestically the indivisibility of human rights
and the need to widen the reach of human rights to the increasing non-state sector.
The ministry would look at strengthening the chapter on fundamental rights and the enforcement
mechanisms and procedures spelled out in the Constitution on the lines proposed in the Draft
Constitution Bill, 2000, as multi-party consensus was reached on most of these issues.
Incorporating economic, social and cultural rights in the Bill of Rights as per international bestpractice, will help empower people in areas such as disaster management and responses, andaccess to basic needs such as health, education and access to housing and land.
Finally there is the need for strengthening of human rights dimensions in the conflicttransformation process paying special attention to human right violations in the context of thearmed conflict, Sri Lanka’s obligations under international law, example the Geneva Conventions,and the rights of conflict affected women and children.
It has been pointed out that the Constitution refers to Sinhala as THE official language while
Tamil is referred to as ALSO an official language’. All legislation includes a ritual like final
provision declaring that in the event of inconsistency between the Sinhalese and Tamil versions of
the legislation, the Sinhalese version shall prevail. Similar blanket provisions have been declared
unconstitutional in countries such as Canada where there are two, equal official languages. These
constitutional and legal provisions that may undermine the equality of status have to be looked atwith a view towards rectifying anomalies. Since the Ministry of Constitutional Affairs is also
addressing these issues it is important that the two ministries work together on these reforms. A
29

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

joint committee consisting of senior officials from the two ministries and a civil society
membership will help to facilitate the process.

Objectives:-

To strengthen the constitutional recognition and protection of human rights.
To ensure parity of status of the Sinhala and Tamil languages.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) – Short Term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:-

Aseries of seminars on the various aspects of constitutional reform with key stakeholders;
Awareness-raising activities
The drafting process

Outputs:
Greater constitutional guarantees for human rights, language rights and access to justiceBudget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Total Budget- SLR 15 mi (USD 0.15 mi)- SLR 15 mi (USD 0.15 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and other participating agency:
M/DM&HR -Secretary
Ministries of Constitutional Affairs and Justice, Faculty of Law, University of Colombo, Civil
Society groups30

R o a d

P-10

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aStrengthening Human Rights: Making Laws
More Effective

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministries of Constitutional Affairs, Justice, Higher Education, Universities, therelevant human rights institutions, civil society

Background and Rationale:
In Sri Lanka legislation and mechanisms for the protection of human rights exist. Often however,the legislation and institutions are not effective due to defects in implementation. This projectseeks to empower institutions to perform more effectively. Law reform will be necessary in somesituations:
Law Reform:i) A review of the Human Rights Commission Act to promote regional/provincial divisions of
the Commission and access to the Commission, greater respect for its recommendations anddirectives, broaden its mandate to cover international human rights norms and commitments
and where necessary have special sub-committees - e.g. on unethical religious conversions,
economic, social and cultural rights; look at extending the mandate of the HRC and coverprivate sector.
ii) Legislation on the Ombudsman, Official LanguagesAct should be reviewed.
iii) Post Legislative Judicial Review- this Parliamentary Select Committee on human rights
reached agreement in principle on this vital area in 2004 but due to dissolution of Parliament, it
was not proceeded with.
Effective implementation of laws
There is a gap between the theory and practice of the law in the area of language rights. There isa paucity of competent public servants who are trilingual. Given the need for an international
language it is vital that the longer term objective with respect to language proficiency be public
servants, police officers and more youth who are fluent in the two official languages andEnglish.
The education system needs to be reformed to reflect the priority for learning three languages
not merely two. An incentive scheme should be designed for new recruits to the police andpublic service to encourage such persons to be trilingual. Effective audio-visual language
training packages should be designed to facilitate such language learning.

31R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Since the university system produces a large number of Arts graduates who find it difficult tosecure employment, Arts and Language departments in universities should be encouraged tooffer courses in Translation which not only include instruction in language skills but also
techniques of translation etc. Most Arts Faculties in the university system have departments of
Sinhala and several also have departments of English and Tamil. The language departments willwith the assistance of other relevant departments develop curricula for an interdepartmental
module in translation that will be promoted as a course that will make students employable but
also equip them with skills that promote national unity and inter-ethnic harmony. Since
universities will not have the resources to initiate a process described above the Ministry should
facilitate the same by providing technical and other resources.
The 13th Amendment to the Constitution provides for an incentive scheme for the Police tolearn another national language, but these provisions lack adequate implementation.
Since the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights will necessarily have to work
closely with persons affected by disasters, affected communities and other groups in often themost isolated and vulnerable regions of the country, the Ministry could take the lead indeveloping a pool of skilled public servants and officials who will be able to provide leadershipin such outreach activities.

Objectives:-

To strengthen institutions responsible for the protection of human rights
To ensure effective implementation of existing laws with particular reference to language

Time frame for implementation:
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) – Medium Term

Geographical areas of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:

32-

A critical assessment of the performance of the Human Rights Commission, Ombudsman,
Official Languages Commission with particular reference to law reform-

The drafting of law reform proposals for the relevant legislation-

Discussions with stakeholders and civil society groups-

Discussions with Universities on the translation course curriculum development-

Development of anAction Plan for translation courses

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Outputs:-

Greater human rights and language rights protection on the ground.
Making university graduates, inArts faculties for example, more employable.

Budget:Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget- SLR 30 mi (USD 0.30 mi)- SLR 30 mi (USD 0.30 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR – Secretary
Ministries of Constitutional Affairs, Justice, Higher Education, Universities, the relevant humanrights institutions, civil society33

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

P-11

i n

S r i L a n k aStrengthening Women’s Rights

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministries of Women’s Affairs and Constitutional Affairs, and civil society and labour
organisations focusing on women’s issues.

Background and Rationale:
This is a cross cutting issue which has significant impact on governance, human rights, and peace in
Sri Lanka. The Ministry of DM and HR will work closely with the other relevant Ministries
including Women’s Affairs to provide legal teeth to the Women’s Charter, encourage greater womenparticipation in politics and other key democratic institutions such as the public service and the
judiciary.
The Women’s Charter is merely aspirational. It should be made legally binding. Election laws could
be reviewed to require political parties to nominate a certain percentage of women for elections.
Steps to promote greater women participation in democratic institutions without resorting to quotas
would also be studied and explored.
At a more particular level the Ministry should consider immediate short-term measures to ensure theexpression of views of women in tsunami and conflict affected areas. As stated above, in the various
committees and task forces set up within the Ministry, the Ministry should serve as a model withrespect to women’s participation and representation.
A vital area to explore is with respect to protecting the human rights of migrant women workers. The
Ministry should facilitate links between human rights and women’s groups in the host countries and
Sri Lanka. These groups can then support women who have serious problems through legal andother means. Several civil society groups in Sri Lanka have discussed such an initiative but have notproceeded beyond that point. Governmental support and facilitation could help progress on theissue. Such initiatives will supplement efforts to address such concerns through intergovernmental
cooperation.

Objectives:

34-

To strengthen women participation in governance and public affairs.

-

To empower marginalised womenR o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aTime frame for implementation:
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) – Medium Term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:-

Areview of developments since the adoption of the Women’s Charter.

-

A series of seminars/dialogues on women’s empowerment, the Women’s Charter andwomen’s involvement and representation in politics and public life, with a view to theintroducing law reform.

-

A study on the viability of linkages between women’s groups and human rights groups in
Sri Lanka and in countries with women migrant workers, with a view to providing support
to such workers.

Outputs:
The empowerment of an important, yet vulnerable, sector of Sri Lankan society

Budget:Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget- SLR 20 mi (USD 0.20 mi)- SLR 20 mi (USD 0.20 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Ministries of Women’s Affairs and Constitutional Affairs, and civil society and labour
organisations focusing on women’s issues.

35

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

P -12

i n

S r i L a n k a

Voting Rights of Migrant Workers

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministry of Labour, Elections Commission, ILO and Civil Society groups.

Background and Rationale:
Migrant workers contribute greatly to the national economy. Many of them undergo risks, leavefamily and friends, experience loneliness and isolation as they pursue employment abroad. They
have no way of participating in the very basic and minimum citizen’s right- the right to vote at
democratic elections in their own country. Political parties and civil society groups havehighlighted the need for migrant workers to be able to exercise their franchise, but little has been
done to realize this aspiration. The European Union Election Observation Mission in its report
released in February 2006 has urged the Government to take steps to facilitate the exercise of theright to vote of his important group of citizens and at a seminar following the release of the report
some of the challenges involved in extending the franchise to this group were discussed. It became
evident that there are various options that international best practice offers to achieve thisobjective.
While such facilitation of the franchise is desirable purely in terms of the human rights of theworkers involved, at a policy level, it also amounts to recognition of their valuable contribution to
the well being of the country.

Objectives:
To ensure that migrant workers exercise their right to vote at Sri Lankan elections in a manner thatguarantees the integrity of the democratic process.

Time Frame for Implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) – Short term

GeographicalAreas of Implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:

36-

Acomparative study on international best practice on the matter.

-

A discussion on the practical consequences of extending the franchise in this matter and theR o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k amost appropriate method for doing so in Sri Lanka.
-

Areview of election laws to facilitate the change.

Outputs:
Greater citizen participation in governanceBudget:Year 1 (2006-2007)
Total Budget- SLR 20 mi (USD 0.20 mi)- SLR 20 mi (USD 0.20 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact persons in lead and other collaborating agencies:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Ministry of Labour, Elections Commission, ILO and Civil Society groups.

37

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

P-13

i n

S r i L a n k aIssues Pertaining to a Durable Peace in Sri Lanka

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministry of Education, civil society actors, religious leaders

Background and Rationale:
The foremost challenge facing Sri Lanka today is that of developing a political solution to thecountry’s protracted ethnic conflict. It is clear that any viable solution will have to include power
sharing. Understandably, in recent years the focus of attention has been power sharing. However if
a negotiated settlement based on a power sharing is to preserve the unity of the country and sustain
a durable peace, it will also have to deal adequately with issues of national integration, power
sharing at the Centre, creating a new inclusive Sri Lankan identity and establishing mechanisms
and processes to facilitate national unity. Sri Lanka must begin the process of study and reflection
on whether the Rainbow Nation concept popularized by President Mandela in South Africa, with
its celebration of diversity and distinctiveness with unity and commonality could be adapted tofacilitate the evolution of a new plural national identity and ethos here.
The Ministry would take the lead in commencing the process of deliberation on this important but
often-neglected issue. The Ministry would encourage critical and new thinking in areas which
often cause prejudice, sectarianism and conflict.
The possibility of introducing courses or modules in comparative religion in schools to encourage“understanding the other”, so important in plural societies should also be explored. Recent tensions
due to allegations of unethical conduct by various religious groups have highlighted the need for
greater inter-religious dialogue and interaction. Many groups who have opposed legislation to
restrict “unethical conversions” have supported the idea of an Inter-Religious Council of religious
leaders to deal with allegations of unethical or improper conduct, through collaborative
investigation, dialogue and mediation.

Objectives:-

To foster the development of a new inclusive national identity
To facilitate a long-term peace in the country based on equality, dignity and mutual respect.

Time frame for implementation:
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) – Medium term
38

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

OrganizationalArea of Implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:-

An in-depth study of the laws, practices and symbols of different religious and ethnic
groups.

-Designing courses/modules on comparative religion, to be introduced as part of the school
curriculum.

-

A study of the appropriateness and viability of establishing an inter-religious council ofreligious leaders.

Outputs:
Promoting a durable solution to the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka by fostering better understanding
between religious and ethnic communities.

Budget:Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget- SLR 40 mi (USD 0.40 mi)- SLR 40 mi (USD 0.40 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR – Secretary
Ministry of Education, civil society actors, religious leaders39R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

P-14

i n

S r i L a n k a

Encouraging Good Governance within the Ministry

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministry of Justice and civil society actors

Background and Rationale:
The Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights should not only declare its commitment
to good governance, but it should also be seen to be practicing it. Good governance requires andencourages constructive criticism, checks and balances, institutional review mechanisms anddebate and deliberation at the policy making level. The Ministry should establish within its purview
an institutionalized ‘Critique Council’, consisting of relevant civil society organizations, althoughcivil society groups are often wary of being co-opted by government and even healthy interaction
between government and civil society suffers as a result. The composition of the council shouldtake gender and ethnic balance and representation into account.

Objectives:-

Provide a useful forum for informed discussion and deliberation-

Ensure the engagement of civil society in a manner that is mutually beneficial-

Demonstrate openness, commitment to good governance and respect for diversity of views
that is more than mere lip service, but rather, is concrete and tangible-

Be innovative and establish a best practice that could be emulated by others

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) – Short Term

Geographical area of implementation:
Within the Ministry. Civil society groups involved should be representative of the different regionsof the country

Activities:

40-

Identifying individuals/groups to serve on the ‘Critique Council’-

Identifying mechanisms to provide for ‘Opposition’deliberation and input-

Quarterly, structured meetings chaired by the Minister-

Provision of information to Members of the ‘Opposition’R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Outputs:
A widely-representative, institutionalized ‘Critique Council’ within the Ministry, consisting ofcivil society actors

Budget:Years 1-2 (2007-2008)
Total Budget- SLR 10 mi (USD 0.10 mi)- SLR 10 mi (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and participating agency:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Ministry of Justice and civil society actors

41

R o a d

42

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aChapter 3
Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Assessment

3.1

Key Issues

The objective of a hazard assessment is to identify the probability of particular hazards occurringin a specified future time period, as well as gauging the intensity and area of impact. Risk
assessments include collecting detailed quantitative and qualitative information andunderstanding risk, its physical, social, economic, and environmental factors and consequences. It
is a necessary first step for any disaster reduction measure or strategy for Sri Lanka.
Though many institutions have begun mapping hazard risks in Sri Lanka, there is no unified
methodology or agreement in producing information. The practical problems of data exchange andscale of mapping have to be resolved. There is also a need for technical assistance from specialised
training agencies to support such institutions to develop their own cadre of specialists. Training isrequired for all related agencies in systems such as GIS and remote sensing capabilities. Further,
there is a need for all maps and other databases to be made available on digitised formats toagencies involved in DRM efforts.
Multi-hazard risk and vulnerability assessments are extremely important in the design and settingof engineering facilities and in zoning for land use planning. Such multi-hazard, vulnerability andrisk assessments should be taken into account in planning the development of hazard prone areas.
In the case of conflict analysing the root, proximate and catalytic causes of conflicts is very
important for the design of effective conflict transformation programs. There is also a need ensurethat vulnerability reduction is factored into the design of reintegration programs for excombatants.

43

R o a d

M a p

f o r

3.2

Strategy

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

The suggested programme of activities under the hazards, vulnerability and risk assessment theme,
encompasses the systematic use of available information to determine the likelihood of certain
events occurring and the magnitude of their possible consequences. As a systematic approach, it
includes the following activities:
Identifying the nature, location, intensity and probability of risk
Determining the exposure and degree of vulnerabilities to the threat
Identifying the capacities and resources available
Determining acceptable levels of risk
In order to formulate a comprehensive strategy to carry out the assessments in the short, medium
and long term, a three pronged approach has been suggested on a priority basis for the proposed
activities over the next 10 years:
i. The DMC will coordinate with all lead agencies for DM to work on arrangements by which
resources can be shared and common agendas/ programmes drafted. DMC will take steps
to re-establish the map users committee at Survey department to ascertain the needs of
map producing agencies to have a better response and coordinating mechanism. DMC will
also help decide the map scales and boundaries of administrative areas for uniform
adaptation by map producing agencies
ii. Data from satellites (high resolution images, remote sensing data etc) should be madeavailable as a priority in the short term to all institutions engaged in risk management
activities. DMC will facilitate interaction with International and UN agencies to obtainsuch data which can be exchanged between agencies working on different aspects of risk
assessment in Sri Lanka. DMC will also assist in establishment of a committee for RS/GIS
users in DM data production to identify and develop standards, facilitate data sharing andcoordination among all GIS and RS users.
iii. The hazard information should be freely available. Maps and other documents should be
loaded onto the DMC website and be put together in a vulnerability atlas as well. The maps
should also be revised regularly and detailed maps can be made available in a virtual
database with restricted access.
The programme components under the theme of hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment include
the following:
Flood simulation models for all major river basins; development of flood inundation maps forurban areas frequently affected by flooding, as well as for downstream areas of main dams;
Development of tsunami hazard zonation maps;
44

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Landslide hazard zonation mapping for landslide prone districts of Sri Lanka;
Seismic zoning for areas vulnerable to seismic/ micro-seismic activities;
Development of drought prone area maps;
Development of wind zoning maps for cyclone prone areas;
Development of Vulnerability Atlas for Sri Lanka and the establishment of Disaster Risk
Management Information Systems;- Factoring vulnerability reduction into reintegration programs for ex-combatants.
In the short term, several projects have been identified as 'high' priority for Sri Lankan agencies
involved in risk mapping and assessments:i.

Landslide Hazard Zonation Mapping for Landslide Prone Areas:
Since 10 districts of Sri Lanka are increasingly prone to landslides, there is an urgent need tosupport the landslide hazard zonation activities of the NBRO. This will enable
identification of the most vulnerable areas as a first step to put in place a decision making
tool that guides future physical planning in those areas.

ii.

Flood Simulation Models for Major River Basins:
It is necessary to develop flood simulation models for the major river basins in Sri Lanka(Kelani, Gin, Nilwala, Mahaveli in the short term and in Walawe, Bentara, Kalu and otherriver basins in the mediumlong term). This exercise will generate flood simulation tools as adecision-making aid for development plans. It will also feed into the development of floodinundation maps for urban areas frequently affected by floods.

iii.

Flood Inundation Maps for Downstream Areas of Reservoirs to Assess the Flood Situation
due to Sudden Release of Water or Dam Breaches:
Large reservoirs located in the central and north-central regions also contribute toflood vulnerability due to the potential for sudden releases from spillways andpossible dam breaches. A 'high' priority in this sector is to identify highly vulnerable
areas in the downstream areas for 10 pre-identified high risk dams in the short term
and for all other dams through medium term plans. This will also help improve thecapacity for surveillance and monitoring of about 210 medium and large dams in the
country.

iv.

Supporting Interventions in the Short Term:To enable efficient flood inundation and dam break flood inundation mapping of thecountry as a priority in the short-medium term, specific interventions will be required fromconcerned agencies, ministries and the government:45

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a- An airborne survey (LIDAR) of river basins is a basic requirement in the identification ofphysically vulnerable basin areas- NeedtomakeposttsunamistudiesbyUnitedStatesGeologicalSurvey(USGS),Universities,Coast
ConservationDepartment(CCD)andothersavailableinacommonformatforinvolvedagencies- Share information across all other risk areas amongst partners included in Sri Lanka's risk
management framework.

3.3

Project Proposals

The following projects have been identified to be of high priority with regard to the Hazards, Risk
and VulnerabilityAssessments for Sri Lanka:

46

HVR-1
HVR-2
HVR-3
HVR-4
HVR-5
HVR-6
HVR-7
HVR-8
HVR-9
HVR-10Landslide Hazard Zonation Mapping
Establishment of DRM Information System at DMC
Flood Risk Assessment
Coastal Vulnerability Assessment & Risk Analysis
Development of Drought-prone Area Maps of LGA
Dam Safety & Risk Assessment
Vulnerability & Risk Assessment for LGA
Vulnerability Atlas
Development of Wind Zoning & Storm Surge Maps
Seismic Zonation Maps

HVR-11
HVR-12
HVR-13
HVR-14
HVR-15Integrated Epidemic Risk Assessment
Major Transportation Accidents
Major Industrial Accidents
Terrorism & Human made Disasters
Reintegration of Ex-combatants

R o a d

HVR-1

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Landslide Hazard Zonation Mapping

Agencies involved:
National Building Research Organization (NBRO)

Background and Rationale:
Nearly 23% of the land area of Sri Lanka spread over the central hills is highly prone to landslides.
Scientific studies at NBRO have shown that the frequency of landslides is increasing in particular,
because of improper human intervention such as unplanned intensive cultivation, nonengineered
constructions, deforestation, and neglect of land.
NBRO, under its Landslide Hazard Zonation Mapping Project (LHMP), has so far generated
landslide hazard zonation maps at 1: 50,000 scale covering Kandy, Kegalle, Ratnapura, Nuwara
Eliya, and Matale districts, and at 1: 10,000 scale covering selected areas of the above districts. In
addition, the Landslide Studies and Services Division (LSSD) of NBRO provides consultancy
services to the government (for EIA & IEE) and the private sector regarding landslide hazard,
vulnerability and risk assessments (instrumentation and monitoring), slope stability analysis,
geotechnical testing and design of preventive and corrective measures.

Objectives:a. To update the already prepared landslide hazard zonation maps (both 1:10,000 and
1:50,000 scale maps) considering the changes in land use patterns within that area.
b. To map the districts of Matara, Hambantota, Galle, Kalutara and Badulla at 1:50,000 scale,and selected vulnerable areas, at scales 1:10,000 or larger.
c. To research on improving the reliability in predicted hazards.

Time frame for implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term:
Mapping in Matara, Galle, Kalutara and Hambantota Districts
Year 3-5 (2008 2010) - Medium term:
Updating already prepared maps, detailed mapping of selected vulnerable areas, and research on
improvements to the methodology
Year 8-10 (2011 2015) - Long term:
Updating maps prepared during Phase I, detailed mapping of additional vulnerable areas, andcontinuing research on improvements to the methodology
47

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

GeographicalArea of Implementation:
Landslide prone areas of Badulla, Nuwara Eliya, Ratnapura, Kegalle, Kandy, Matale, Galle,
Matara, Kalutara and Hambantota districts.

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007):- Landslide Hazard Zonation Mapping at 1:50000 scale in Matara, Galle, Kalutara and Hambantota
Districts- Landslide hazard zonation mapping at 1:10000 scale in selected areas of Kandy, Matara, Galle
and Hambantota- Strengthening the NBRO in order to carry out listed activities efficiently
Year 3-5 (2008 2010):- Updating landslide hazard zonation maps prepared for the districts of Matale, Kandy, Nuwara
Eliya, Kegalle, and Ratnapura- Detailed mapping of selected populated urban areas in hilly regions at larger scales- Assessment of reliability in predicted hazard and study the possible improvements to theexisting methodology
Year 8-10 (2011 2015):- Updating landslide hazard zonation maps prepared for the districts of Badulla, Matara,
Kalutara, Galle, and Hambantota- Detailed mapping of selected populated urban areas in hilly regions at larger scales- Assessment of reliability in predicted hazard and study the possible improvements to theexisting methodology

Output:Updated landslide hazard zonation maps at 1:50,000 scale covering the districts ofMatale, Kandy, Nuwara Eliya, Kegalle, and Ratnapura
Landslide hazard zonation maps at 1:50,000 scale covering the districts of Matara,
Hambantota, Galle, Kalutara and Badulla
Landslide hazard zonation maps at 1:10,000 scale covering the landslide prone DS
divisions in the above districts
Detailed landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk maps for selected urban areas in themountainous region at suitable scales

Budget:Phase I (2006-2007)
Phase II (2008-2010)48

SRL 157 million (USD 1.57 mi)
SRL 89 million (USD 0.89 mi)R o a d

Phase III (2011-2015)
Total Budget

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

SRL 149 million (USD 1.49 mi)
SRL 395 million (USD 3.95 mi)

Funding status:
Local and Foreign Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
NBRO
Head, Landslide Studies and Services Division
National Building Research Organisation, 99/1 Jawatta Road, Colombo 05
Tele: (011) 2588946 ext 216 Fax: (011) 2502611 email: nbro@sltnet.lk49

R o a d

M a p

f o r

HVR 2

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Establishment of DRM Information System at DMC

Agencies involved:
Disaster Management Centre (DMC)

Background and rationale:
In the proposed multi-stakeholder, multi-sectoral and multi-level DRM activities by DMC
and by all stakeholder agencies an immense amount of information and its systematicmanagement will be required. For fulfilling this, a GIS based DRM Information System isrequired at DMC.
In this context establish a GIS unit in DMC for GIS and remote sensing; managing DMC web
portal; managing spatial and non-spatial databases; managing risk information systems
hardware/equipments at DMC; coordinating with other agencies for risk information and otherneeded activities.

Objective:
To establish a GIS based DRM Information System at DMC for the benefit of all stakeholders
associated in DRM

Time frame (start date and period):
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term
Year 3 - 5 (2008-2010) - Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
DMC with networking to other national and sub-national agencies

Activities:
Short term:a. Set up committee to propose the system for establishing the GIS unit in DMC with corefunctions of GIS and remote sensing; managing DMC web portal; managing spatial andnon-spatial databases; managing risk information systems hardware/equipments at
DMC & National Emergency Operations Centre (NEOC); Coordination with otheragencies for risk informationb. Establishment of above50

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k ac. Integrate all information systems to build a comprehensive “Risk Information
Management System” for the countryd. Establish system to collect data regularly and update the information system from therelevant national and sub-national agencies in pre-prepared formats through e-mail, web orother appropriate system
Medium term:e. Development of spatial database for LAs in relation to general aspects such asadministrative boundaries, population, human settlements etc
f. Integration for hazard zonation maps into spatial databaseg. Establish system to collect data regularly and update the information system from therelevant national and sub-national agencies in pre-prepared formats through e-mail, web orother appropriate system
h. Making data available on line

Output:
GIS based risk information system established at DMC

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3 - 5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget- SRL 40 million (USD 0.40 mi)- SRL 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)- SRL 50 million (USD 0.50 mi)

Funding status:
Local or International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General,
Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

51

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

HVR-3

i n

S r i L a n k a

Flood Risk Assessment

Agencies involved:
Irrigation Department; MahaweliAuthority of Sri Lanka (MASL)

Background and rationale:
Flood hazard maps are not available at present for major rivers in Sri Lanka such as Nilwala, Gin,
Kelani, Mahaweli, Kalu, Walawe, Bentara. These are extremely important, especially in the present
context, when DRM initiatives are to be carried out in a systematic manner.

Objectives:-

Flood simulation models for major river basins (Kelani, Kalu, Gin, Nilwala, Mahaweli,etc.) made available as a decision making tool
Development of flood inundation maps at scale 1:10 000 (for LG areas frequently affectedby flooding )Identification of highly flood prone basins, Districts & Divisions

Time Frame:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term - Kelani, Kalu
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term- Gin, Nilwala, Mahaveli
Year 6-10 (2011-2015) - Long term - Walawe, Bentara

Geographical area of implementation:
Different parts of Sri Lanka affected by floods.

Activities:
a. Development of Digital Elevation Models (DEM) including data collection
b. Rainfall data analysis
c. Development of appropriate simulation models
d. Enhancement of prediction and EW capacity including
Identify critical locations and install river flow gauges in critical upstream stretches
Observation, collection and analyses of hydrological data
Recording and maintenance of flood levels in river basinse. Collection of field data on historical events such as the May 2003 floods52R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

f. Digitisation of topographic data of DEM
g. Development of GIS maps for most vulnerable LAs
h. Assess the performance of existing flood protection works for improvements

Output:Flood hazard maps (digitised and hard copies) in Nilwala, Gin, Kelani and Mahaweli
riversFlood hazard maps for Kalu and other river basins

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)-

SRL 105 million (1.05 mi USD)
SRL 130 million (1.30 mi USD)
SRL 120 million (1.20 mi USD)

Total Budget-

SRL355 million (3.55 mi USD)

Funding status:
Required local or international funds

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Irrigation Department
Director General, Department of Irrigation
Tel: 011-2584984
Email: id_dgi@solaris.gov.lk
MahaweliAuthority of Sri Lanka011-2580816
011-2505675

53

R o a d

M a p

f o r

HVR-4

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Coastal Vulnerability Assessment and Risk Analysis

Agencies involved:
Coast Conservation Department, NARA, Department of Survey, UDA, Department of Census& Statistics, DoM, GSMB, NHDA

Background and rationale:
Tsunami inundation maps of coastal areas must be carried out in order to conduct vulnerability and risk
analysis of these areas. The need prevails to evaluate the coastal belt through ocean topography when
taking implementation polices regarding the reconstruction and re-housing efforts.
Tsunami hazard zonation maps and coastal erosion maps in the coastal areas at the scale of 1:
10,000 will be useful as a decision making tool to increase coastal protection and to advanceshoreline management practices.
Risk analysis and mapping are proposed to be undertaken by the Coast Conservation Department,
which needs support by way of equipment and personnel. This may be undertaken in partnershipwith University of Moratuwa in collaboration with an experienced international relevant institute.

Objectives:a. To develop tsunami & sea level rise hazard zonation maps and coastal erosion maps at thescale of 1;10,000 for use as decision making tools to increase coastal protection and to
improve shoreline management practices (short term)b. To develop physical and socio-economic maps in tsunami vulnerable area (long term)Time frame:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short-term comprising activities a, b & e
Year 6-10 (2011-2015) - Long-Term comprising activities c & dGeographicalArea of implementation:
Coastal belt of Sri Lanka

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Developing tsunami hazard zonation maps (inundation maps: collecting field data anduse of models in the process)54

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k ab. Developing coastal erosion maps for coastal areas at the scale of 1;10,000 (Digitisation of
topographic data and development of GIS maps)c. Strengthening CCD to take up the above activities with greater responsibilities for risk
assessment in vulnerable areas
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)
d. Identifying urban coastal and other communities vulnerable to tsunami eventse. Monitoring and assessment of physical ecological and socio-economic status of marine andcoastal habitats /resources susceptible to coastal and marine hazards

Output:- Tsunami hazard and coastal erosion maps for coastal belt (Short term)- Physical and socio-economic maps in tsunami vulnerable area (Long term)

Budget:For Pilot Project proposed in the Roadmap:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
SRL 30 mi (USD 0.30 mi)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) Year 6-10 (2011-2015)

SRL 20 mi (USD 0.20 mi)

Total Budget

SRL50 mi (USD 0.50 mi)-

For Total Project Proposal as proposed by CCD:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) SRL 300 mi (USD 3.0 mi)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) Year 6-10 (2011-2015) SRL 200 mi (USD 2.0 mi)
Total Budget-

SRL500 mi (USD 5.0 mi)

Funding status:
Funding required - Local funding/International Funding

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies
CCD,
Director, Coast Conservation Department. Tel: 2449197, radbsamaranayake@fisheries.gov.lk
ParticipatingAgencies:
Short term : Department of Survey: Addl. Surveyor General
Tel: 2508038, 2369586
NARA: Head, Marine Biological Resource Division
Tel: 2521914 E-mail: champa@nara.ac.lk
Long term (For physical and socio-economic maps): UDA, Department of Census & Statistics,
Department of Meteorology, NARA, GSMB, NHDA55

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

HVR-5

i n

S r i L a n k a

Development of Drought Prone Area Maps of LGA

Agencies involved:
DoM, DoA, Department of Survey, ID,Agrarian Services Department, MASL

Background and Rationale:
Drought is the most significant hazard in Sri Lanka in terms of people affected and relief provided. Southeastern district of Hambantota and the North-western region of Mannar and Puttalam are most prone.The
droughttendencyis markedlyless intheSouth-westofSriLankawherethereis heavy rainfall.
Regionally significant droughts occur once in about every 3-4 years and a severe drought occurs
once in about 10 years. The main causes of drought are low rainfall, deforestation, improper land
use and unplanned cultivation. A severe drought occurred in 7 districts of the country in 2001
namely, Hambantota, Moneragala, Kurunegala, Puttalam, Rathnapura, Badulla andAmpara.
If drought maps are available in drought prone LAareas they can be used as a decision making tool.

Objective:
To make available the drought prone area maps as a decision making tool.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2008-2010)- Short term
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)- Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
Selected districts in North-western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Provinces

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Analyse historical records of rainfall, surface runoff data, land use patterns, soil types,
population density, water use patterns
b. Review classification of drought prone areas
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
c. Map areas prone to droughts and identify drought prone districts and divisions
d. Assess the risk of possible impacts
e. Develop GIS maps
56

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Output:-Micro-climatic maps (Medium term)
Drought vulnerability maps (Medium and long term)

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget-

SRL 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)
SRL 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)
SRL20 million (USD 0.20 mi)

Funding status:
Funding required; Local or International

Contact persons at lead and participating agencies:
DoM
Director General, Department of Meteorology
Tel: +94-11-2694104 E-mail: meteo@slt.lk
ParticipatingAgencies:
Department ofAgriculture
Director General
Tel: 081-2386323, 081-2386484
Irrigation Department:
Director General of Irrigation
011-2584984, id_dgi@solaris.gov.lk
Survey Department: Surveyor General, Tel: 2508038, 2369586
MahaweliAuthority of Sri Lanka: Director General
Relevant ProvincialAgrarian Services Departments57

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

HVR-6

i n

S r i L a n k a

Dam Safety and Risk Assessment

Agencies involved:
Irrigation Department, MASL, CEB, NWS&DB

Background and rationale:
Out of 351 major/medium dams in Sri Lanka, 80 are categorised as “large dams” according tointernational conventions. Compared to other man-made structures, dams have an inherently highrisk for failures that may occur due to natural events and/or human errors. Older dam structures andrelated problems complicate the situation further. A Portfolio Risk Assessment study carried out in
2003/2004 revealed that even some of the modern dams are showing signs of aging (such as
seepage, leakage, cracking and scouring).
Procedures for safe operation of flood gates too need to be updated for current downstream
conditions. Even during normal flood events there may be loss of life and property when radial
gates are opened for the flood water to pass downstream. For reservoir downstream flood
monitoring and management, coordination between major dam owners is essential. An Action Planfor different dam breach situations is required for each dam. There should be continuous dialogue
between district secretaries, LAs etc. of downstream areas for early warning and to facilitate rapid
evacuation.Aflood preparedness plan needs to be developed for downstream of each reservoir.
Despite the continued efforts by all dam managers to improve O&M practices, limited resources available
for management of these dams are likely to result in further deterioration of this situation and increase inrisk levels. Therefore it is proposed to conduct hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment studies that willprioritisetheremedialmeasures, modifications orstrengthening proposals w.r.t.dams.

Objectives:- To conduct portfolio risk assessment studies for high risk dams and prioritise
strengthening measures- To develop flood inundation maps for downstream areas of main dams for identificationof areas vulnerable to dam break and sudden discharge from reservoirs

Time frame:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term - For 30 identified high risk dams
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term- For all other dams
Year 6-10 (2011-2015) - Long term - Re-assessment and continuing safety measures58

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
Different regions of Sri Lanka where dams are located

Activities:
a. Identification of critical reservoirs that may have high impact due to sudden discharge.
b. Failure mode analysis and Dam Break Modellingc. Survey of the river and the flood plain (preferably LIDAR survey)d. Development of inundation maps
e. Portfolio risk assessment and physical improvements

Output:Contour maps and flood inundation maps for dam break and rapid flood-discharge fora. 30 identified high risk dams (Short term); all other dams (Medium term)b. Portfolio risk assessment of all the damsc. Prioritised list of remedial measuresd. Plans and estimates for the improvements

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)

SRL 650 million (USD 6.50 mi)

Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)
Total Budget

SRL 650 million (USD 6.50 mi)
SRL 200 million (USD 2.0 mi)
SRL1500 million ( USD 15.0 mi)

Funding status:
Funding required; Local and International Funds

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Irrigation Department:
Director General of Irrigation
011-2584984, id_dgi@solaris.gov.lk

Ceylon Electricity Board
Additional General Manager
Tel: 0777-380166 Fax 2543267

MahaweliAuthority of Sri Lanka
Head/Dam Safety Management Centre
011-2580816 011-2505675 damsafety@sltnet.lk

National Water Supply and Drainage Board
Additional GM, Regional Operations
rororo@sltnet.lk , Fax 2635996

59

R o a d

M a p

f o r

HVR-7

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Vulnerability and Risk Assessment for Las

Agencies involved:
DMC, Department of Survey, UDA, NPPD, and all DM line agencies

Background and rationale:
At present the country does not have a system of considering the hazard vulnerability and risk in theprocess of preparing development plans, issuing development approvals etc. by the LAs. In future,
integration of DRR in development activities at the local level will be made mandatory as per theprovisions of the DM Act. The UDA, being the main agency responsible for planning anddevelopment in urban areas in the country, will have to ensure that this process is implemented
properly. Similarly NPPD will be responsible for monitoring the process in regions not declared asurban areas.
It will be necessary to have guidelines for vulnerability and risk assessment for LAs to be used by
LA planners / officials, as well as the UDA and NPPD planners. It is also proposed to prepare
inundation maps for selected 2003 disaster affected and tsunami affected LAs initially and otherLAs subsequently.

Objective:
To draw up guidelines for classification, assessment and mapping of physicalvulnerability and risk levels available as a tool for use by urban and town planners in the
country and to create awareness among them in using the said guideline
To prepareinundationmaps for selected 2003 disasteraffected and tsunamiaffected LA areas
To prepare inundation maps for other LAs

Time frame:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) Short-term
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) Medium-term

Geographical area of implementation:
High risk districts of the entire country60

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Constituting a committee of experts to refine classification of physical vulnerability andrisk assessment in the Sri Lankan context
Developing guidelines for use in high risk Districts, Division and Urban LAs
Monitoring by DMC
Awareness creation about the guidelines among LAplanners / officials

Output:Guidelines for assessment of physical vulnerability and risk in LAareas
Inundation maps for selected LAareas

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget

SRL 5 million (USD 0.05 mi)
SRL 5 million (USD 0.05 mi)
SRL10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
Funding required; Local or International

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
ParticipatingAgencies:
Department of Survey, UDA, NPPD, all DM line agencies

61

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

HVR-8

i n

S r i L a n k a

Vulnerability Atlas

Agencies involved:
DMC, Department of Survey, UDA, NPPD, all DM Stakeholder Agencies, Department of Census
and Statistics

Background and rationale:
For urban as well as development planning a vulnerability atlas for Sri Lanka is a very useful tool.
This is particularly important as integrating DRR in development is a major component in the total
DRM process. In Sri Lanka, information is also not available on prevalent hazards andvulnerabilities for different areas. In this context, a compendium of maps related to settlements,
population density, land use patterns of LA areas etc. would be a very useful tool for everybody
involved in DRM activities, especially urban planners.
A vulnerability atlas consolidated with line zonation maps on most frequent hazards and historical
records on impacts, identification and rating of districts and divisions on multi-hazard risk scale
will be invaluable for the country.

Objective:
To make information on spatial distribution of various type of natural hazards and vulnerable areas
availableas acompendiumfor useas adecision making toolforpreparedness and mitigation programmes

Time frame:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
62

Compilationof maps relatedtosettlements,population density,land usepatterns ofLA areas etc
Consolidatewithlinezonationmapsonmostfrequenthazardsandhistoricalrecordsonimpacts.
Identification and rating of districts and divisions on multi-hazard risk scaleCompilation of VulnerabilityAtlas for Sri Lanka and update every 10 years.
Preparation of a detailed historical referral data base on disasters

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Output:VulnerabilityAtlas for Sri Lanka at the scale of 1:50,000

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget- SRL 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)- SRL 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)- SRL20 million (USD 0.20 mi)

Funding status:
Required; Local or International Funds

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
ParticipatingAgencies:
Department of Survey, UDA, NPPD, all DM Stakeholder Agencies, Department of Census andStatistics

63

R o a d

M a p

f o r

HVR-9

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Development of Wind Zoning and Storm Surge Maps

Agencies involved:
CCD, DoM, NARA, Department of Survey

Background and rationale:
Major parts of North-Eastern province experience cyclones and high winds. These areas wereseverely affected by the 1978 cyclone during which the wind speed may have varied from 100 to
150 mph. During recent years heavy winds and tornados were experienced in many areas of thecountry. After the cyclone, with UNDP funding technical assistance was provided for the local
professionals to map the cyclone affected areas and develop the following documents in 1979:
a. Design Manual for cyclone prone areas
b. Report of the committee on Design, Construction and Regulations for Buildings in the
Cyclone ProneAreas of Sri Lanka Sessional Paper III
c. Reports
Cyclone Study Overview
The cyclone prone areas of Sri Lanka
Physical Planning Guidelines
The reconstruction of damaged buildings
Building design policy and cyclone resistance
Cyclone resistant masonry construction
Strengthened Wattle and Daub
Sri Lanka cyclone hand out
After 26 years, it is appropriate that these outputs developed in 1979 be viewed and revised asnecessary, and also be used to develop storm surge maps of the coastal areas.

Objective:
To develop zoning maps for areas prone to cyclone and storm surge made available as a decision
making tool

Time frame:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) Short-term
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) Medium-term
64

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
North-eastern provinces and coastal areas of Sri Lanka

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Review of cyclone wind zoning maps developed after 1978 cyclone publication of wind zonation& storm surge inundation maps (TechnicalAssistance required)Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Update the wind zoning aps as necessary and develop storm surge maps

Output:Wind zoning and storm surge mapping

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SRL 20 mi (0.20 mi USD)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SRL 20 mi (0.20 mi USD)
Total Budget- SRL40 mi (0.40 mi USD)

Funding status:
Funding required; Local or International

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
CCD
Director, Coast Conservation Department
Tel: 2449197, Email: radbsamaranayake@fisheries.gov.lk
ParticipatingAgencies:
Director General, Department of Meteorology
Tel: 2694104 E-mail: meteo@slt.lk
Director General, NARA
Tel: 2521932 E-mail: champa@nara.ac.lk
Addl. Surveyor General,
Department of Survey
Tel: 2508038, 2369586
65R o a d

M a p

f o r

HVR-10D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Seismic Zonation Maps

Agencies involved:
Geological Survey and Mines Bureau (GSMB)

Background and rationale:
In Sri Lanka, GSMB is the focal agency for earthquake related activities. There are only two
seismometer facilities available in Sri Lanka, one at Pallekelle which belongs to the GSMB
and the other at the University of Peradeniya. The one at Pallekelle is one of the automatic(unmanned) stations of the global seismic network maintained by the University ofCalifornia, San Diego. When an earthquake occurs, the information received by this station isprocessed together with data obtained from other stations (at least three elsewhere in theworld) by the US scientists. The resulting information about the magnitude and location of
the earthquake is fed into the USGS (United States Geological Survey) web-site.
On comparing the present-day plate boundaries with a world seismicity map it may be observedthat Sri Lanka lies in the middle of the Indo-Australian plate away from the very high seismic
zones, and thus is safe from disastrous earthquakes. However, geo-scientists believe that a newplate boundary has been developing in the Indian Ocean south of Sri Lanka during the last 8 million
years. Some less intense earthquakes and minor tremors felt in Sri Lanka may have their origins inthis newly developing seismic zone.
Keeping this in mind, there is a need to make available to all stakeholder institutions accurate
information on seismic zones and the hazard potential. In the present context of rapid
development there is a need for earthquake resistant designs in construction as well as forseismic zonation maps of the entire country. Installation of seismic stations and capacity
development including technology and human resource development, are also required.

Objective:
To have accurate information on seismic zones and hazard potential made available to all
stakeholder institutions (especially the construction industry)

Time frame:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term66

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Enhancement of the present seismic monitoring and data capturing capacity to Internationals
standards and establishment of a seismic monitoring unit at GSMB.
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Development of seismic zonation maps. Technical assistance as well as funding required.

Output:-Seismic stations established as required
Seismic zonation maps developed for the entire country

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SRL 10 mi (0.10 mi USD)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SRL 5 mi (0.05 mi USD)
Total Budget- SRL15 mi (0.15 mi USD)

Funding status:
Funding required; Local or International

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
GSMB
Director, Geological Survey and Mines Bureau
Tel: 011 2725745
E-mail: gsmb@slt.lk

67

R o a d

M a p

f o r

HVR-11

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Integrated Epidemic Risk Assessment

Agencies involved:
Ministry of Healthcare and Nutrition, Provincial Ministries of Health, LGAs, Department of
Animal Production and Health, NWS&DB, Department of Agriculture, ID, Department ofAgrarian Services, MASL

Background and rationale:
From time to time there may be an outbreak of epidemics in different parts of the country. These
may affect not only humans and animals but also the agriculture sector. The social and economic
impact of such a situation can be enormous. Prediction, prevention and early control of epidemic
can be achieved only through a good surveillance system operating on a routine basis. The systemshould include methods to receive information immediately to detect an epidemic from any partof the country.
Receiving immediate information on an outbreak in any part of the world that may result incontagion locally too should be covered in the system. Timely action will be required for control
measures at the points of immigration and importation.
Routine systematic surveillance methods for the prediction and early detection of epidemics areof paramount importance to prevent the situation from reaching disastrous proportions as well as
to take effective control measures.
As the determinants of epidemics are usually multi-sectoral, such a system has to be a multistakeholder and multi-level to be effective in predicting, preventing and controlling most epidemics.
Therefore, in addition to strengthening the individual surveillance systems, an integrated
epidemic risk assessment system must be established on a selective basis, with greater emphasison high risk geographical areas for different epidemics and vulnerable populations.

Objectives:a. To strengthen the existing disease surveillance systems in health, animal production andagriculture sectors
b. To establish new surveillance systems for selected diseases with no such systems inoperationc. To establish an integrated epidemic risk assessment system for selected high risk
epidemics where such integration is essential68R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aTime frame:Year 3-5 (2008-10) -Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
High risk geographical areas for different epidemics and vulnerable population, but generally
covering the whole country

Activities:
a. Evaluation of existing systems of disease surveillance in different sectors (ie. health, animal
productionandagriculture) andidentification ofgaps and areas to bestrengthened
b. Strengthening the weak areas and development of new surveillance systems where
necessary on a priority basisc. Establish a system to disseminate EW and information on epidemics immediately uponsuch identification from any part of the countryd. Establish integrated epidemic risk assessment systems for selected situations where suchintegration is essential

Output:Epidemic surveillance systems

Budget:Year 3-5 (2008-10)
Total Budget- SRL 2 mi (0.2 mi USD)
- SRL2 mi (0.2 mi USD)

Funding status:
Funding required; Local or International

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Ministry of Healthcare & Nutrition
Epidemiologist,
Epidemiological Unit,
231, De Saram Place, Colombo 10.
Tel:2681548, 2695112, Fax: 2696583
E-mail: chepid@sltnet.lk, epidunit@sltnet.lk

69

R o a d

M a p

f o r

HVR-12D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Major Transportation Accidents

Agencies involved:
Department of Police, Road Development Authority (RDA), Railway Department,
Transport Board, Central Environment Authority, Urban Development Authority, LAs, Fire
Brigades, Health Dept., PCs

Background and rationale:
There is a tendency towards increase in accidents during transport of hazardous materials. With rapid
development and launching of large investment projects, more and more materials of different kinds
are being transported by road as well as rail. Precautions should be taken to reduce the chance for
accidents. Furthermore recommendations may have to be proposed to introduce transport regulations.
These may include imposing avoidance of peak hours, selected routes in the cities or highways, using
outer circular roads of cities where possible etc. For such recommendations the risk levels and patternsof accidents have to be identified, i.e., in a spatial manner as well as reflecting the time of the day. The
type, condition and age of vehicles too matter in such accidents.
Recommendations for improving the situation cannot be proposed or precautions taken without
having a reliable database of required information. Therefore it is necessary to develop a database
related to transportation accidents, while addressing the priority area of unguarded railway
crossings..

Objective:
To develop a database for transport related accidents, and tackle risks of unguarded railway
crossings

Time frame :Year 1-5 (2006-2010) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities:
Medium term:a. Collection of historical data on rail and road transport and analysis of riskb. Identifying the risk levels70R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k ac. Developing the data base, with system for regular updating of the databased. Implement railway crossing protection schemes as a priority

Output:Database related to transportation accidents, protection of prioritised railway crossings

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) -SRL 50 mi (0.50 mi USD)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) -SRL 50 mi (0.50 mi USD)
Total Budget- SRL100 mi (1.0 mi USD)

Funding status:
Funding required; Local or International

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Police Department,
Road DevelopmentAuthority,
Railway Department,
Transport Board
Other participating agencies:
Central EnvironmentAuthority,
Urban DevelopmentAuthority,
LocalAuthorities, Fire Brigades,
Health Dept.,
Provincial Councils

71

R o a d

M a p

f o r

HVR-13D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Major Industrial and Occupational Accidents

Agencies involved:
Department of Labour, Central Environment Authority, National Apprenticeship and Industrial
Training Authority, Industrial Development Board, Department of Police, Fire Brigades, PCs,
LAs, CEB, CPC, Ministries of Power and Energy, Agriculture, Transport, Industrial Development,
Education, Highways, Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, Office of theCommissioner of Workmen's Compensation., InsuranceAgencies etc.

Background and rationale:
In Sri Lanka accidents have often been reported in industrial establishments during working hours.
With rapid development taking place and large export-oriented investment projects being
launched, the tendency for industrial accidents is becoming greater.
Though there are adequate regulations governing working conditions in the country in the race tocope with the various development aspects and competition, there may be a tendency for lapses,
resulting in accidents.
Precautions must be taken to reduce such accidents, and furthermore recommendations proposed
to avoid or minimise them by introducing new laws, regulations and promotional programmes.
Material handling, power activated machinery, workers falling from heights, falling objects, handoperated machinery, treading on unsafe or hazardous materials etc. also cause accidents.
Occurrences of accidents at different times of the day and the age of the workers too have an
impact. Department of Labour has carried out studies on these based on which risk assessments canbe conducted. The type, condition and age of various machineries used in the processes too may
have an impact on the increase of such accidents.
For taking precautionary measures, a reliable database related to industrial and occupational
accidents must be developed and made available with regular updating ensured. The database mustalso include an inventory of hazardous materials, industries using such hazardous materials etc.
Studies already carried out by the Department of Labour can be taken forward in implementing thisactivity.

Objective:
To develop a database related to industrial and occupational hazards and hazardous materials
72R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aTime frame:Year 1-3 (2008-2010)- Medium-term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country; Hazardous industries and work places

Activities:
a. Collection of historical data on industrial and occupational accidents and analysis of riskb. Identifying the risk levels
c. Developing the database including an inventory of hazardous materials, industries using
such hazardous materials etc.

Output:Database related to industrial and occupational accidents, and hazardous materials

Budget:Year 1-3 (2008-2010)- SRL 15 mi (0.15 mi USD)

Total Budget- SRL15 mi (0.15 mi USD)

Funding status:
Funding required; Local or International

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Department of Labour
Commissioner (Industrial Safety),
Chief Factory Inspecting Engineer, Department of Labour,
255/6, Kirula Road, Colombo 5
Tel: 0112368258

E-mail: wapeterr@yahoo.com

Participating agencies:
Central Environment Authority, National Apprenticeship and Industrial Training Authority, Industrial
Development Board, Fire Brigades, Provincial Councils, Local Authorities, Ceylon Electricity Board,
Ceylon Petroleum Corporation, Ministries of power and energy, Agriculture, Transport, Industries,
Education, Highways, Police Department, Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, Office of
the Commissioner of Workmen's Compensation., InsuranceAgencies etc.
73

R o a d

M a p

f o r

HVR-14D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Terrorism and human made disasters

Agencies involved:
Police and Military Forces, DM line agencies

Background and rationale:
Sri Lanka has adequate past experience on terrorist activities and human-made disasters in the
recent and not so recent past. To minimise life loss and damage from such disasters, high risk areas
must be identified.
In order to apply precautionary measures, a database on locations highly vulnerable to terrorism
and man-made disasters must be developed after identification of high risk areas..

Objective:
To identify high risk areas for application of appropriate measures

Timeframe:Year 1-2 (2006-07)

Geographical area of implementation:
Entire country, but initially, high risk areas

Activities:
Short term:a. Identify high risk areas /locations
b. Assess hazard impacts on such areasc. Develop a database on high vulnerable locations

Output:Adatabase on locations highly vulnerable to terrorism and man-made disasters developed

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SRL 10 mi (0.1 mi USD)
Total Budget- SRL10 mi (0.1 mi USD)74

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Funding status:
Funding required; Local or International

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Police and Military Forces75R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

HVR-15i n

S r i L a n k a

Reintegration of Ex-combatants

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Armed Forces, Ministry of Interior Affairs

Background and Rationale:
The reintegration of ex-combatants is a vital step for any country attempting to step out of a conflictsituation. Reintegration as a part of a wider demobilization, disarmament and reintegration (DDR)
process increases security as a trust building exercise and in reducing the capacities of warring
parties to go back to war at the macro level. It also removes a potential source of insecurity giventhat it aims to deal with a body of people with combat experience who may find themselves unable
to find employment and face difficulties in being accepted by their communities, so may bevulnerable to joining criminal and armed groups. Reintegration is one measure in a larger processof development to ensure that socio-economic conditions are improved and can buttress a politicaltransition. Thus, reintegration is a vital step for progress in any peace process and for addressing
critical post-conflict problems like unemployment, crime, spoiler violence etc.
In Sri Lanka a comprehensive process of DDR will be dependent on the negotiation of a final peaceagreement. Currently there are a large number of ex-combatants in those who previously served in
the armed forces and have retired. In addition there are approximately 60,000 deserters a majorityof whom have refused to accept the Government’s offer of amnesty in exchange for a return toservice while a number have agreed to be re-listed. There are reports that some of these deserters
are involved in and responsible for the increased levels of crime and violence, hence this is an area
which requires urgent attention. Their inclusion into a reintegration program and recognition as excombatants need to be clarified by the relevant authorities.
Those who have left the armed services have tried to reintegrate back into society on their own, andreceived assistance from the state to do so. In this process of reintegration, ex-combatants haveencountered a number of difficulties, be they economic, social or psychological. Other states inconflict have engaged in processes of reintegration preceding a peace process, either as a part ofprofessionalizing the armed forces or as a response to a de facto situation of a large body ofdemobilized (whether by the state or self-demobilized) combatants. Such processes are also
beneficial in that they address a key problem and serve as important learning process for a morecomprehensive DDR process that is expected to be a part of a final peace agreement.
There is a clear need for an initial reintegration program that can facilitate and monitor thetransition of ex-combatants as productive and integrated members of their communities. While76

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k arecognizing the differences between these two bodies of ex-combatants they may share some of thesame socio-economic problems so including both groups within a reintegration program would
have an added advantage.
The caveat is that any comprehensive reintegration programme can be only done within thecontours of a peace agreement between the protagonists, however the Ceasefire agreement gives
the space to conduct the necessary ground work, which would become the basis for a reintegration
strategy at a latter point.Acritical first step in a reintegration process should be a base line study thatprovides a better understanding for policy makers and service providers how well ex-combatants
have integrated into society. A study is required, given the lacuna in the knowledge regarding excombatants and how they have fared. This study will identify existing problems and best practices,
and also document the experiences of ex-combatants in their efforts to reintegrate including such
experiences in other countries. These can feed into the design of a reintegration program when thetime is right so as to ensure a more viable program and a more sustainable process.

Objective:
Design and create the preliminary analysis and baseline studies needed to develop a reintegration
program for ex-combatants.

Time frame for implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) – Short Term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country; including the North East where applicable

Activities:
The methodology of the study involves interviews with ex-combatants and other key informants, inorder to understand three interdependent dimensions of reintegration; social, economic andpsycho-social. Some of the key areas for examination include:- Assessing factors which facilitate or hinder the process of reintegration-

Assessing the type of intervention, mechanisms and schemes required to address the
problems of ex-combatants-

Assessing what reintegration means to ex-combatants and the community-

Assessing the role of the state in facilitating this process-

Assessing the role of other critical institutions, including those within the community, in
facilitating the process-

Assessing how vulnerable groups (handicapped, aged, women) have fared77

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a-

Assessing the relationship between the combatants and their communities-

Assessing psycho-social issues faced by ex-combatants-

Assessing the opportunities for development in the ‘host community’

Interviewees will be randomly selected from a lists supplied by the armed forces and other relevant
state authorities. Some of the primary tools for carrying out the study include questionnaire-based
interviews with the ex-combatants, focus group discussions with community leaders, interviews
with key informants (particularly armed force personnel, ministry officials etc.) secondary
research etc.

Outputs-

Collating the data needed to develop a reintegration program for the current caseload.

-

Act as a vital tool for a future, comprehensive DDR process.

-Facilitate and strengthen networks between key institutions such as the Ministry of
DM&HR, the armed forces, local communities etc.

Budget:Year 1 (2006-2007)
Total Budget- SLR 12 mi (USD 0.12 mi)- SLR 12 mi (USD 0.12 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Armed Forces, Ministry of Interior Affairs

78

Chapter 4
Tsunami and Multi-hazard Early Warning System

4.1

Key Issues

The primary objective of a multi-hazard Early Warning System (EWS) is to generate advancewarnings and thus improve the capacity of decision-makers to take appropriate action evenprior to the occurrence of a major hazard event. It consists of the collection, consolidation,
analysis and dissemination of risk information. Setting up an effective multi-hazard EW
system requires concerted planning, organising and controlling of relevant information. It
also requires influencing all concerned stakeholders to ensure that information isdisseminated to the right decision-makers and vulnerable communities, at the right time.
Current efforts at institutionalisation of EW systems have come as a response to the impacts of
the recent tsunami disaster in 2004. The proposed tsunami EW arrangements must be integrated
into existing warning systems to promote a multi-hazard approach to make the system
sustainable. Although there are various ongoing efforts to develop tsunami EW capacities, but
only few to improve existing capacities for other more frequent hazards. The multi-hazard EW
system needs to be end-to-end, linking hazard detection systems with warning communication,with a feedback mechanism that allows post-event assessments.
Also, it is important to note that agencies in Sri Lanka are organised according to specialised tasks
for different hazards, without much information sharing or partnerships with other agencies. It isthese gaps that the DMC's EW division seeks to address by bringing together all concerned
agencies. Another key issue that needs to be addressed is the lack of communication lines andespecially their unavailability during times of emergency communication.

4.2 Strategy
The strategy is to focus on hazards that frequent Sri Lanka the most, like floods, landslides, cyclones,
and droughts, while also providing for measures to tackle a low-frequency but high impact hazard like79

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

the 2004 tsunami. It follows that the coastal areas, which are vulnerable to not just a tsunami,
but also cyclones, storm surges, and floods would be the priority geographical areas. The
floods affecting many of these coastal areas are caused by seasonal rainfall, and an
improvement in meteorological observation and prediction capabilities will enable anefficient EW system for not just these annual floods but also cyclones and lightning strikes.
This coupled with landslide prediction will enable timely warnings to communities at risk
across 10 districts of Sri Lanka.
There is consensus amongst relevant departments responsible for detection and EW that particularhazards should be the responsibility of one and only one institution, to avoid overlaps in mandates
and appropriate actions. The dedicated units or sections established in relevant institutions would
be the sole authority for generation of warnings as needed. This warning would be communicatedthrough the NEWC and all the existing communication channels within the government's
administrative set up, in addition to the three major channels of communication already being used
for mass dissemination: popular media, such as television, newspapers, radio etc; the WirelessCommunication system of the Police; and military communication channels of the Joint Operation
Command. Also, the relevant agencies could explore the option of communication networks of
SLRCS in particular and NGOs in general, to help multiply the reach of these warnings to thecommunities at risk. This warning dissemination activity will be covered by projects formulated
under the 'PublicAwareness, Training and Education' component.
The following programmes have been prioritised to consolidate multi-hazard EW systems acrossvarious agencies in Sri Lanka:i.

Establishment of the National EW Centre (NEWC) of Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka as part of the Regional Tsunami EWS is required to maintain an EW centre. There will be
two centres, viz., a Tsunami Early Warning Centre and a Multi-hazard Early Warning Centre in the
proposed DMC building as detailed in proposal P-6 in Chapter 2, at the premises of the Departmentof Meteorology at Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo.
At present, issues with regard to weather-related natural disasters are handled by the Meteorology
Department while those related to seismological and ocean wave activities are handled by GSMB andNational Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency (NARA) respectively. Similarly
different institutions handle issues with regard to other disasters such as floods, landslides etc. A good
networking facility connecting all the relevant institutions is vital for proper coordination during
disasters. The Government of Sri Lanka has identified the need to establish a multi-hazard EW centre
as a matter of urgency. This centre has to be equipped with state-of-the-art facilities to be able tocommunicate directly with international as well as national agencies during emergencies.
ii.

Improvement in Meteorological Observation and Prediction Capabilities

At present, it is necessary to install a number of automatic weather stations at crucial
80

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k alocations in Sri Lanka and connect them to a central hub at the departmental head office inColombo. A proper all-weather communication system should be developed to link thesestations. In addition, data processing, display and archival systems are to be installed at the
National Meteorological Centre of the Department to keep real time track of the weather
situation in the country.
iii.

Flood Monitoring and Forecasting

In parallel to the improvements in meteorological observation capacities, the existing hydrometricnetwork for flood monitoring and forecasting needs enhancement to provide an effective flood EW
mechanism.
iv.

Improvement of Landslide Prediction and EW Capabilities

The proposal is to develop a mechanism for establishing threshold limits for landslide occurrence
and development of landslide EW systems based on the criteria for high risk areas. Suchmechanisms have to be established for the benefit of at-risk communities with their active
involvement. This EW mechanism should be introduced as a real time forecasting system in mostareas vulnerable to landslides and mass (soil) movements.
v.

Development of Effective Cyclone Tracking, Storm Surge and Coastal Flood Warning System

It is proposed to implement a storm surge model and develop a coastal flood warning system for theentire coastal belt of Sri Lanka. More cooperation is required among countries in the region withregard to the tracking of tropical cyclones and other low-pressure weather systems that develop in
the Bay of Bengal.
vi.

Development of Long and Medium Term Drought Forecasting and Monitoring System for
Agriculture and Associated Sectors

Though the agricultural sector is the most vulnerable to frequent droughts in Sri Lanka, adequate
attention has not been given to rainfall monitoring in drought prone areas, drought forecasting and
EW. In order to launch an effective drought-preparedness programme, the existing agrometeorological observation network has to be upgraded along with communication facilities totransfer real time data to the central station. A crop-weather watch group should be formed in order
to interpret the information received from field and other line agencies. As crop-weather
relationships are currently being handled by different divisions, it is imperative to bring them
together to ensure effective and useful information generation and dissemination.
vii.

Development of a Unified Seismic Monitoring, Data Processing and Archival Network

As a matter of urgency, it is necessary to develop and strengthen the capabilities of the GSMB toenable them to locate earthquake risks at the earliest. GSMB will need to connect this network to
the proposed Central Data Processing and Archiving Unit (CDPA). Due to lack of necessary
expertise and software at the GSMB, seismic data acquired by existing stations has not yet been81

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

processed and interpreted locally. A micro-seismic monitoring network to observe reservoirinduced seismicity was operational for the dams built on Mahaveli river during 1982-1991.
However, monitored was restricted to some settlement tremors along the Mahaweli Shear Zone.
viii.

Development of Oceanographic Monitoring System

The local coastal topography, oceanography and marine meteorology are critical parameters
determining the magnitude and the period of high-frequency ocean waves like tsunamis or storm
surges. Thus, oceanographic/ marine meteorological buoys need to be deployed in order to gather
real-time data on local coastal topography, oceanography and marine meteorology. Mapping ofsensitive habitats such as coral reefs, mangroves, sea grass, tidal flats, estuaries, etc are vital togenerate data for mitigation, preparedness and planning for vulnerable coastline areas in Sri Lanka.
ix.

Establishment of EW system for Nuclear AccidentsEnvironmental Radiation Monitoring

Various types of ionising radiation sources are widely used in industrial, medical and agricultural
fields and for other research purposes in Sri Lanka. The sources used for different activities range
from a few Kilo Becquerel to thousands of Giga Becquerel. The loss or misuse of ionising radiation
sources could result in radiation exposure of workers and members of the public and can also leadto environmental contamination. In extreme cases the exposure can be lethal, while lower levels of
exposure could lead to long-term adverse effects on a population.

4.3 Project Proposals
The following projects are being selected over the short to medium term due to their relevance to theearly warning context in Sri Lanka:

82

E-1

Establishment of the National Early Warning Centre (NEWC) of Sri Lanka

E-2

Improvement of Meteorological Observation and Prediction Capabilities

E-3

Improvement of Hydrometric Network for Enhancing Flood Monitoring and
Forecasting Capabilities

E-4

Improvement of Landslide Prediction and Early Warning Capabilities

E-5

Development of Long and Medium Term Drought Forecasting and Monitoring
System for Agriculture and Associated Sectors

E-6

Development of an Effective Cyclone Tracking, Storm Surge Warning System

E-7

Development of a Unified Seismic Monitoring and Data

E-8

Early Warning for Hazards Associated with Major Dams

E-9

Development of Oceanographic Monitoring System

E-10

Establishment of an EWS for Nuclear Accidents and Monitoring ofEnvironmental Radiation

E-11

Erecting Tsunami Warning Towers in Selected Coastal Areas

E-1

Establishment of National Early Warning Centreof Sri Lanka

Agencies involved:
Disaster Management Centre, Department of Meteorology,

Background and Rationale:
In Sri Lanka, issues with regard to weather related disasters are handled by the Meteorology
Department while issues related to seismological activities and ocean wave related activities arehandled by Geological Survey and Mines Bureau and National Aquatic Resources, Research andDevelopment Agency respectively. Similarly different institutions handle issues with regards todifferent natural disasters. As such, a good networking facility connecting all the relevant institutions
is vital for proper coordination during disasters, and the government has identified the need to establish
a multi hazard early warning centre as a matter of urgency. EW can only be issued to the public throughthis Centre, which also has to communicate directly with international as well as related national
agencies during emergencies. Therefore, equipping this centre with state-of-the-art communicationand other facilities is important.
It is suggested to establish a state-of-the-art Tsunami Early Warning Centre and a Multi-hazard
Early Warning Centre in the proposed DMC building as detailed in proposal P-6 in Chapter 2 at thepremises of the Department of Meteorology at Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo.

Objectives:
To facilitate timely and end-to-end early warning on potential disaster events

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006- 2007) - Short-term

Geographical are of implementation:
Nation-wide (Sri Lanka)

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Establishment of Tsunami Early Warning Centre and a Multi-hazard Early Warning
Centre in the proposed DMC building at DoM premises
b. Improvement of communication and dissemination capacity83

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k ac. Institutionalizing of inter agency arrangements for national early warning
d. Establishment of coordinating mechanism with agencies within/ outside Sri Lanka

Outputs:
Fully functional and efficient multi-hazard early warning system

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 50 mi (USD 0.50 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 50 mi (USD 0.50 mi)

Funding status:
Local funding/International Funding; New Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Director General, Department of Meteorology84

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

E-2

i n

S r i L a n k a

Improvement of Meteorological Observation andPrediction Capabilities

Agencies involved:
DoM, DMC

Background and rationale :Being a small island in the Indian Ocean with an annual rainfall of 1860 millimetres, Sri Lanka has,in recent times, faced several natural disasters such as tsunami, floods, droughts and landslides.
However, the most common, (over 80 per cent) disasters faced in Sri Lanka are weather related.
Though the average rainfall in Sri Lanka is approximately 1860 mm, the range varies between 900
millimetres in the driest (north-western and south-eastern) regions to over 5500 mm in the wettest(western slopes of the hills) regions. Extreme rainfall, of over 400 millimetres (e.g. Deniyaya 730
mm, 18th May 2003) is not very uncommon in the highlands of Sri Lanka.
The responsibility of monitoring weather in Sri Lanka is with DoM which has its headquarters in
Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 7. The meteorological observational network maintained by theDoM consists of 20 principal meteorological stations, 4 upper air stations, 42 agro-meteorologicalstations and approximately 400 rain-gauge stations.
The equipment used at all the above stations of the meteorological network are manual. No
automatic weather stations or telemetered rain gauges are available in Sri Lanka. In the principal
meteorological stations, observations are performed once every three hours and transmitted to thehead office through public telephone lines. The communication system connecting head office andall the stations in the network are public telephone based and at numerous instances data blackouts
occur due to communication failure, particularly during times of bad weather.
In order to rectify this situation, it is necessary to install a number of automatic weather stations at
crucial locations in Sri Lanka and connect them to a central hub at the departmental head office inColombo. A proper all-weather communication system should be developed linking these stations.
In addition, data processing, display and archival systems should be installed at the National
Meteorological Centre of the DoM to keep real time track of the weather situation in Sri Lanka.

Objectives:
To establish/upgrade and modernise the meteorological observation network to enhancemeteorological prediction capabilities of the DoM

85

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aTime frame of implementation
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Selection of suitable locations (approx. 35) for theAutomatic Weather Station Network
b. Selection of a suitable all-weather communication system for data transfer between
stations and the central hub
c. Selection of a data processing and display system
d. Establishment of the system

Output:A proper meteorological observation system capable of identifying weather systems in real timethus enhancing the weather prediction capability, particularly during bad weather situations.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)- SLR 220 million (USD 2.2 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 220 million (USD 2.2 mi).

Funding status:International Funding; New Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General
Department of Meteorology
383, Bauddhaloka Mawatha
Colombo 7, Sri Lanka.
Tel. +94 112 66 50 88
Fax. +94 112 698 311
Email. Meteo@slt.lk

86

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

E-3

i n

S r i L a n k a

Improvement of Hydrometric Network for Enhancing
Flood Monitoring and Forecasting Capabilities

Agencies involved:
Irrigation Department (ID), Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB), Mahaweli Authority of Sri
Lanka (MASL), DoM

Background and Rationale :The main objective of establishing a flood warning system with improved hydrometric network is
to predict the expected flood levels along the rivers at strategic locations and downstream of major
reservoirs, in order to provide advance warning of a flood disaster to the public.. Five river basins,
Kelani, Kalu, Gin, Nilwala and Mahaweli, are vulnerable to floods and monsoon rain and cyclones
annually cause damage to thousands of families and property worth millions of rupees.
At present there is a good monitoring system of rainfall, river water levels and discharges by the ID
as well as a well-organised flood forecasting system for the Kelani river with an establishedstanding order. There is an organised monitoring system for other river basins but no wellestablished flood forecasting system.
The existing hydrometric network needs to be improved to facilitate the above. The network atpresent is grossly inadequate, especially in the mountainous areas and technologies involved indata collection, transmission and processing lack the required levels of technical sophistication,
operational efficiency and institutional support.

Objectives:
To establish an effective flood warning system, to effectively predict the flood levels along therivers at strategic locations, in order to provide advance warning to the public for the preparedness
for a flood disaster and to minimise the damages caused by the floods

Time frame of implementation
Year 1- 3 (2006-2008) - Short and medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country87R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Improvements to hydrometric network of the country- establishment of new gauging stations- upgrading of existing gauging stations- procurement of new measuring and communication equipment- establishment of effective communication network to convey data from the field- upgrading of the data processing unit
Year 3 (2008)- Improvementstothedataprocessingsystemanddevelopmentofawellorganiseddata basesystem- Improvement of existing flood forecasting system or development of a suitable flood
forecasting model.
- Training for engineering and operational staff in modern hydrological application andinstrumentation

Output:Real time flood forecasting system to mitigate flood hazards comprising- Well established hydrometric network for the country- Well organised data base system- Well established data analysis and forecasting system

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)- SLR 36.5 million (USD 0.365 mi )1. Improvements to gauging network
SLR 30 mi
2. Establishment of effective communication system SLR 5.0 mi
3. Improvements to data processing unit
SLR 1.5 miYear 3(2008 )- SLR 50 million (USD 0.50 mi )1. Establishment of flood forecasting system(Procurement, development of application software) SLR 30 mi
2. Training
SLR 20 mi
Total Budget- SLR 86.5 million (USD 0.865 mi)

Funding status:
Funds NotAvailable; International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Irrigation Department,
Director, Planning Designs and Specialised Services,
Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 7.
88

Participating Agencies:
DoM, Director General
Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 7

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

E-4

i n

S r i L a n k a

Improvements of Landslide Prediction and
Early Warning Capabilities

Agencies involved:
NBRO, DoM

Background and Rationale :Nearly 23% of the land area of Sri Lanka spread over the central and adjacent hilly areas are highly
prone to landslides. Scientific studies at NBRO have shown that the frequency of landslides isincreasing, particularly due to improper human interventions such as haphazard unplanned
intensive cultivation, non-engineered constructions, deforestation, and neglect of land.
Deeply concerned with previous disasters caused by landslides, the Government of Sri Lanka with theassistance of UNDP/UNCHS, formulated the Landslide Hazard Zonation Mapping Project (LHMP) in
December 1989. Due to its multi disciplinary organisational structure, which matched with the project
objectives, NBRO was selected as the implementing agency of LHMP. The UNDP/UNCHS assisted
project (later known as Phase I of LHMP), ended in 1995 delivering several landslide hazard zonation
maps, at 1: 10,000 scale, covering about 1500 sq.km of Badulla and Nuwara Eliya districts. Later UNDP,UNCHS and the Government of Sri Lanka entered into a tripartite agreement, identifying the importanceof landslide hazard zonation mapping and consequently the Government of Sri Lanka singly assisted theextension of LHMPto other landslide prone districts of Kandy, Kegalle, Ratnapura, Kalutara and Matale.
Later, after the heavy floods and landslides in 2003 LHMP was extended up to 2007 adding the three
districts of Matara, Galle and Hambatota. As a result, NBRO has so far generated landslide hazard
zonation maps at 1: 50,000 scale covering Kandy, Kegalle, Ratnapura, Nuwara Eliya, and Matale
districts,andat1:10,000scalecoveringselectedareas oftheabovedistricts.
The principal objectives of the LHMP at its inception were the preparation of landslide hazard
zonation maps and carrying out Awareness Programmes targeting relevant sectors of thecommunity in the hilly region. However, NBRO has now identified the need to introduce real time
forecasting of landslides and EWS as a follow-up for effective utilization of the maps in disastermitigation. Among the reasons for the gaps in the success of the above are the lack of prediction of
rainfall and real time precipitation rates.

Objectives:
The objective of this proposal is to formulate a landslide EWS, developed and established for atrisk communities. This should be introduced as a real time forecasting system.

Time frame of implementation
Year 1-10 (2006-2015) - Short, Medium and Long-term: Implementation as a continuous process89R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
Landslide prone areas of Badulla, NuwaraEliya, Ratnapura, Kegalle, Kandy, Matale, Kalutara,
Galle, Matara and Hambantota districts.

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006 2007) - Development and Establishment of the Forecasting Systema. Updating and up-scaling the already prepared landslide hazard zonation mapsb. Collection of data on soil parameters to be added as an additional layer to hazard maps
c. Identification and installation of automatic rain gauge station in landslide prone areas
d. Installation of suitable instrumentation (e.g. Doppler Radar) to measure precipitation rates
e. Analysis of historical data on rainfall and occurrence of landslides to obtain threshold
limits of initiation of landslides
f. Instrumentation (cost effective and simple instruments) established for communities at risk.
g. Development of a proper data exchange network system among relevant institutions
and communities at risk.
h. Development of the EWS and dissemination of information up to grass root leveli. Training and capacity enhancement
Year 3-5 (2008 2010) - Forecasting, Development and Updating by Research
Year 6-10 (2011 2015) - Forecasting, Development and Updating by Research

Output:Properly established EWS to protect at risk communities and their property from landslide disaster

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)
Total Budget- SLR 8.0 million (USD 0.08 mi )- SLR 4.5 million (USD 0.045 mi )- SLR 4.5 million (USD 0.045 mi )- SLR 17.0 million (USD 0.17 mi)

Funding status:
Local and International Funding; New Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Head, Landslide Studies and Services Division
National Building Research Organisation
99/1, Jawatte Road, Colombo 5, Sri Lanka
Tel: +94-11-2588946
Fax: +94-11-2502611 Email: nbro@sltnet.lk
90

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

E-5

i n

S r i L a n k a

Development of Long and Medium Term Drought
Forecasting and Monitoring System for Agriculture andAssociated Sectors

Agencies involved:
Department ofAgriculture (DoA), DoM

Background and Rationale :As a result of significant negative anomalies of seasonal rainfall, Sri Lanka has been subject torecurrent droughts with negative consequences in almost all sectors of the economy. However, Sri
Lanka's drought strategy has been oriented more on "relief" rather than preparedness. Drought
preparedness promotes a more preventive, risk management approach to droughts reducing
vulnerability to drought and dependence on emergency assistance from government andinternational organisations.
Though agriculture is the most vulnerable sector to droughts in Sri Lanka, adequate
attention has not been given to rainfall monitoring in drought prone areas, drought
forecasting and EW of consequences such as yield reduction of food crops. In order tolaunch effective drought preparedness program, existing agro-meteorological observation
network has to be up graded along with communication facilities to transfer the real time
data to central station. Since present data processing capability of the central station is notadequate, facilities have to be upgraded with direct and communication links to peripheral
stations, DOM and other relevant agencies. Negative rainfall anomalies may manifest in
crops at varying degrees depending on the crop and geographical location. Thus, a cropweather watch group should be formed in order to interpret the information receiviedfrom field and other line agencies. As the crop-weather relationships are currently being
handled by different divisions it is imperative to bring them under one roof so that
effective and useful information generation and dissemination could be accomplished.

Objectives:
Information on potential events of drought and/or inconsistencies in rainfall made available toagriculture and associated sectors as an advanced decision support mechanism

Time frame of implementation
Year 1-2 (2006- 2010) - Short and Medium-term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country91R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Up-grading of agro-meteorological observation network of the country
Procurement of new equipment
Provision of communication links to each agro-met station with e-mail facilities
Up-grading of agro-meteorology division of the DoA
Procurement of high capacity computers (including for Department of Meteorology
Dedicated communication link, leased Internet line
Procurement of new vehicle (double-cab)
Establishment of Crop Forecasting Unit at the DoAHeadquarters
Building construction (an extension to the existing building)
Procurement of computers, office furniture
Establishment of dedicated communication links (telephone and fax)
Establishment of the database on weather and crop data (four different districts)
Formulation of Crop-Weather Watch Group from relevant agencies; bi-monthly meetings
Publishing a seasonal newsletter
Issuing yield forecast of major food crops one month prior to the end of each growing season

Output:Establishment of an end-to-end drought forecasting network with
Complete agro-meteorological observation network of the island
Real-time database on agro-meteorology covering the entire country
Database on crops and other related data with seasonal updating
Seasonal newsletter
Yield forecast of major food crops in each growing season with a sufficient lead time

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 21.28 million (USD 0.212 mi )Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 6.80 million (USD 0.068 mi )Total Budget- SLR 28.08 million (USD 0.280 mi )Funding status:
Funds NotAvailable; International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Head/Agro-meteorology Division
Natural Resource Management Centre
Department ofAgriculture, Peradeniya
92

Participating Agencies:
DoM, Director General
Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 7

R o a d

E-6

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Development of an Effective Cyclone Tracking,Storm Surge Warning System

Agencies involved:
DoM, Coast Conservation Department

Background and Rationale:
The Sri Lankan coast is frequently affected by coastal flooding due to wind-driven waves. Thissituation is more frequent in the southern coastal belt during active phases of the southwest
monsoon, and the eastern, northern coastal areas when cyclonic storms develop close to the islandin the Bay of Bengal or by wind-driven wave activity.
The coastal flooding has aggravated since the tsunami episode of 2004, possibly due to changes
that have occurred in the near shore bathymetry. Therefore, a storm surge model must be
implemented and a coastal flood warning system developed for the coastal belt of Sri Lanka. For
tracking tropical cyclones and other low pressure weather systems in the Bay of Bengal, moreregional cooperation is required.

Objectives:
Effective mechanism for cyclone tracking and storm surge, coastal flood warning system to beestablished to facilitate timely EWTime frame of implementation
Year 1 - 5 (2006-2010) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Development of a properly coordinated cyclone tracking mechanism among regional countries
through WMO/ESCAP Panel on Tropical Cyclones.
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Identification, implementation of suitable models for storm surge, and coastal flood forecasting

Outputs:
Fully functional and efficient cyclone tracking and EWS
93

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget- SLR 1.0 million (USD 0.01 mi )- SLR 20 million (USD 0.20 mi )- SLR 21.0 million (USD 0.21 mi )Funding status:
Funds are not available; Local / International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General
Department of Meteorology,
383, Bauddhaloka Mawatha,
Colombo 7, Sri Lanka,
Tel: +94 112 67 62 59,
Fax: +94 112 698 311

94

Email: meteo@slt.lk

R o a d

E-7

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Development of a Unified Seismic Monitoring andData Processing and Archival Network

Agencies involved:
GSMB

Background and Rationale :As a matter of urgency, it is necessary to develop and strengthen capabilities of GSMB leading tolocating earthquakes at the earliest possible time. A broad band seismic network station, code name
PALK, functions as a joint research project of GSMB and University of California San Diego(UCSD) at Pallekele in the central highlands of Sri Lanka since 2000. This station is equipped witha highly sensitive broadband seismometer with facilities for transmission of near real time data.
The purpose of this station is to provide continuous geophysical observations of global andregional earthquake activity. The PALK is linked with the other Global Seismic Network stations
via a common gateway, IDAHub that opens a pathway to study and analyse global seismic events.
Due to lack of necessary expertise and software at the GSMB, seismic data acquired by this station
has not been processed and interpreted locally so far. A microseismic monitoring network tomonitor reservoir-induced seismicity was operational around the cascade of dams built on
Mahaveli river from 1982 to 1991. However, no significant microseismic activity was monitored
except for some settlement tremors along the Mahaweli Shear Zone.
With the increase in ground vibrations felt in several parts in the country, expert and public concern
has led to resumption of systematic monitoring of microseismic activities. In addition, major
earthquakes occurring in the Indian subcontinent in the recent past necessitate establishment ofsuch a monitoring system. Dam safety Experts have identified the need for an effective seismic
monitoring network covering 32 dams and appurtenant structures, particularly tunnels, withpriority on the Upper Mahaweli and Kelani scheme areas. Establishing an accelerometer network
covering 32 dams to determine peak ground acceleration parameters for utilisation of engineering
designs and risk assessments has also been emphasized. No seismological study has yet been
carried out to gather, process and interpret seismic events, which are felt only in Sri Lanka. Thesecan be studied using local short period seismic network like the University network. Therefore, it isnecessary to fix any technical problem pertaining to the malfunction of the existing university
network and connect it to the GSMB. Secondly, it is proposed that 6 short period three-component
seismographs be added to this network to strengthen the coverage. These 6 new stations have to beinstalled at suitable locations in Colombo, Jaffna, Mannar and 3 stations in Upper Mahaweli/
Kelani major dam/ reservoir scheme areas thus increasing the total number of local short period
seismometers to 10.
95R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

The CDPAwould have the following requirements:
1. Data processing, archiving facilities requiring software, hardware and trained personnel
2. Direct link with DMC in case of earthquake or tsunami to disseminate news
3.. R&D requiring seismologists, geophysicists, geologists and computer scientists

Objectives:
Enhanced seismic monitoring capacity in Sri Lanka to facilitate constant upgrading of seismic
zonation, EW and preparedness

Time frame of implementation
2008-2012: Medium and Long-term: 5 years

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:
Year 1-3 (2008-2010)- Networking of seismographic stations (University network, new seismographs of major dams)- Improvement of broadband seismic network
Year 4-5 (2011-2012)- Establishment of a seismic data processing and archival unit
- Enhancement of monitoring and data capturing to international standards

Outputs:
Enhanced seismic monitoring capacity in Sri Lanka

Budget:Year 1-3 (2008-2010) - SLR 75.0 million (USD 0.75 mi )Year 4-5 (2011-2012) - SLR 187 million (USD 1.87 mi )Total Budget- SLR 262 million (USD 2.62 mi)

Funding status:
Funds NotAvailable; International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director, Geological Survey and Mines Bureau, Galle Road, Colombo 396

R o a d

E-8

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Early Warning for Hazards Associated withMajor Dams

Agencies involved:
ID, MASL, CEB

Background and Rationale :Dams have an inherently high risk for failures that may lead to potential loss of life and property.
Apart from human errors, failures can occur due to natural events. In addition, aging dams andrelated problems complicate the situation further. The potential threat to life and property should be
sufficient to justify the careful monitoring of these dams.
Sri Lanka has over 320 major and medium dams that have been constructed and maintained over
the years. Out of these, 80 have been categorised as “large dams” according to international
conventions. These dams are operated by MASL, ID and many other government organisations.
None of these dams have an adequate EWS.
Coordination between dam operators is needed for effective reservoir downstream flood
monitoring and management. Even in normal flood events spill gates will be opened for the
release of excess water and there could be disturbance to the downstream. Operation proceduresfor safe passage of floodgates need to be updated for the current downstream conditions.
Also an action plan for dam breach situation or opening of gates during intense rainfall is required
for each dam. To facilitate rapid evacuation in case of an emergency, there should be continuous
dialogue with District Secretaries, Divisional Secretaries, GNs, LAs etc. of downstream areas,
regarding necessary contact information for EW.
Therefore it is proposed to establish EWS appropriately for each dam or a cluster of dams fordissemination of emergency information among downstream communities, to make evacuationand emergency activities possible.

Objective:
To establish system for providing EW to district secretaries / divisional secretaries, LAs andcommunities in case of an imminent hazard associated with major dams

Time frame of implementation
Year 3-5 - (2008-2010) - Medium term
97

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
Different regions of Sri Lanka where selected dams are located

Activities:-

Establishment of Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system.
Establishment of EWS for major dams

Output:Efficient EW and monitoring system in place for major dams

Budget:Year 1-3 (2008-2010) - SLR 50 million (USD 0.50 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 50 million (USD 0.50 mi)

Funding status:
Funds NotAvailable; Local / International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Irrigation Department
Director General of Irrigation
011-2584984, id_dgi@solaris.gov.lk
Mahaweli Authority of Sri Lanka
Head/Dam Safety Management Centre
011-2580816 011-2505675 damsafety@sltnet.lk
Ceylon Electricity Board
Additional General Manager
Tel: 0777-380166 Fax 2543267

98

R o a d

E-9

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Development of Oceanographic Monitoring System

Agencies involved:
NARA

Background and Rationale :The local coastal topography, oceanography and marine meteorology are the critical parameterswhich determine the magnitude and the period of high frequency ocean waves like tsunamis andstorm surges. Hence, oceanographic/marine meteorological buoys need to be deployed to gather
real time data on local coastal topography, oceanography and marine meteorology. Mapping ofsensitive habitat such as coral reefs, mangroves, sea grass, tidal flats, estuaries, etc is vital togenerate data\ information for mitigation, preparedness and planning.
NARA established a sea level station at Mutuwal Fishery Harbour, Colombo (western coast) andTrincomalee in collaboration with the University of Hawaii Sea Level Center in August 2004 andNovember 2005 respectively. There is minute to minute sampling, with data transmission every 15
minutes through the Global Telecommunications System (GTS) of World MeteorologicalOrganisation (WMO) and the Japanese Geostationary Meteorological Satellite system. One moresea level station with real-time data transmission capabilities will be established at Kirinda(southern coast) with assistance from the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency of Germany.
The tide stations will provide real-time information on the development of a tsunami following aseismic event, thus guiding the issuance of tsunami warnings as well as cancellation, if the tsunami
is non-destructive.

Objectives:
To build national technical capabilities on timely identification and origin of ocean based
disasters; to strengthen the capacity for ocean monitoring and timely issuing ofdata\information to the Disaster Management Centre, relevant agencies, institutes,
authorities, etc.

Time frame of implementation
Year 3-10 (2008- 2015) - Medium and Long term

Geographical area of implementation:
Colombo, Trincomalee, Kirinda, Jaffna peninsula99

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2008-2009)
a. Installation of real time tide gauges and connecting them to the regional /international network through the Global Sea Level Observing System.
b. Establishing permanent monitoring stations for sea level, ocean waves, tides, currents
c. Bathymetric surveys and nautical chartingYear 3-5 (2010-2012)
d. Establishment of offshore real time oceanographic/marine meteorological buoye. Strengthening of Geographic Information System (GIS) and remote sensing capabilities
f. Establishment of online database for ocean based disasters
g. Upgradation of hydrographic survey equipment and cartographic capabilities
Year 6-8 (2013-2015)h. Capacity building and maintenanceOutput:Real time data on oceanographic parameters- Bathymetric data and nautical chart- Numerical models on tsunami generation and propagation- Simulation of tsunami characteristics (height and run-up) along the coast and risk
assessment for different areas along the country's coastal line.
- Inundation and sensitive coastal habitat maps

Budget:Year 1-2 (2008-2009)- SLR 246.4 million (USD 2.464 mi )Sea level monitoring and tsunami forecasting
10,000
Monitoring of ocean based disasters and risk and vulnerability analysis
300,000
Human resources development
4,000
Infrastructure development
150,000
Infrastructure development for R&D in Oceanography/ marine sciences
800,000
Capacity building in oceanography
400,000
Human resources development in oceanography & marine sciences

800,000

Year 3-5 (2010-2012)- SLR 401.1 million (USD 4.011 mi)
Sea level monitoring and tsunami forecasting
8,000
Monitoring of ocean based disasters and risk and vulnerability analysis
150,000
Human resources development
3,000
Infrastructure Development
50,000100

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

Infrastructure development for R&D in Oceanography/ marine sciences
Capacity building in Oceanography
Human resources development in Oceanography & marine sciences
Ocean going research & survey vessel
Year 6-10 (2012-2016)
Sea level monitoring and Tsunami forecastingS r i L a n k a

800,000
300,000
700,000
2,000,000- SLR 104.3 million (USD 1.043 mi)
2,000

Monitoring of Ocean based disasters and risk and vulnerability analysis
Human resources development
Infrastructure development
Infrastructure development for R&D in oceanography/ marine sciences
Capacity building in oceanography
Human resources development in oceanography & marine sciences
Total Budget

i n150,000
1,000
50,000340,000
100,000
400,000- SLR 751.8 million (USD 7.518 mi)

Funding status:
Funding available /Additional Local Funding/ International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Head\Oceanography Division, NARA, Crow Island, Colombo 15
TP: +94-11-2521008
Fax: +94-11-2521932 Fax: +94 112 698 311

101

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

E-10

i n

S r i L a n k a

Establishment of an EWS for Nuclear Accidents andMonitoring of Environmental Radiation

Agencies involved:
Atomic EnergyAuthority (AEA), DoM, Sri Lanka Navy

Background and Rationale :Various types of ionizing radiation sources are widely used in industrial, medical andagricultural fields and as well as research purposes in Sri Lanka. The activities of the sources
range from a few kilo becquerel to thousands of giga becquerel. The loss or misuse of ionizing
radiation sources could result in radiation exposure of workers and the public and can also leadto environmental contamination. In extreme cases the exposure can be lethal while lower levelsof exposure could lead to long-term health effects. Radiological accidents that can affect Sri
Lankan are two fold:1.

Nuclear reactor accidents in neighbouring countries: Nuclear reactor accidents inneighbouring countries like India and Pakistan will not have an immediate effect on
Sri Lanka as the nearest reactor is more than 100 km away. Though there will be no shortterm health effect, radioactive material deposited in parts of Sri Lanka may however cause
long-term exposure increasing the probability of cancer.

2.

Radiological accidents in Sri Lanka: Accidents in radiation facilities in Sri Lanka cancause deaths if timely action is not taken to mitigate the consequences. In most cases,
consequences will be limited to the immediate vicinity of the facility. AlthoughRadioactive Dispersive Devices (or dirty bombs) used by terrorists can spread radioactive
material over a large area depending on the power of the bomb, it will not lead to immediate
death due to radiation exposure. However long term health effects can exist, though not as
severe as long-term exposures expected from a nuclear accident.

AEA as the national agency has the main responsibility for establishment of plans for radiologicalemergencies which may arise in the country.
Current activities: The AEA is taking all efforts to establish a Radiological Emergency Response(RER) Plan at the national level. The IAEA through its programme of technical co-operation isproviding support to the development of such capabilities through several technical cooperation
projects. As a result of this programme the IAEA has already trained some officers in emergency
response planning. The AEA has already taken the following steps to develop capabilities on RER
according to IAEA guidelines. Two doctors have been trained for medical management of radiation
102

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

exposed personnel. Four officers have been trained to serve on RER Planning. Some essential
equipment required for radiological monitoring and assessment have also been purchased.
Gaps to be addressed: To establish an early detection system for nuclear accidents anddevelopment of an environmental radiation monitoring programme for the protection of people
and the environment from radionuclides. It should include:- Installation of on-line radiation monitoring instruments for detection of radionuclide in
the environment due to nuclear accidents (early detection system).
- Purchase of analytical and sample collecting equipment for quantitative analysis ofradionuclides in the environment (environmental sample analysis) leading to decisions
on protective actions in the affected- Purchase of a suitable vehicle to collect environmental samples and setting up a mobilelaboratory for radiological emergency assessment and response.
- Provide training to relevant officials

Objective:
To establish an organized RER capability for timely coordinated actions at the national level during
nuclear/radiological accidents

Time frame of implementation
Year 3-10 (2008-2015) Medium and Long-term

Geographical area of implementation:
Jaffna, Mannar, Trincomalee districts, Colombo and Southern Province

Activities:
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
a. Purchase of equipment for on line radionuclide monitoring, data transfer,, and sample
collection and analysis
b. Installation and testing of equipmentc. Preparation of a Base Line for radionuclides.
d. Purchase of a suitable vehicle.
e. Personnel training (Specialised)f. Installation of 4th monitoring station in Colombo
g. Data collection and assessmenth. Environmental sample analysis

103

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aYear 6-10 (2011-2015)
i. Installation of 5th monitoring station in Southern Province.
j. Data collection analysis
k. Environmental sample analysis.

Output:Well organised radiation monitoring programme and timely response capability of participating
agencies.

Budget:Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)- SLR 39.5 million (USD 0.395 mi )- SLR 6.6 million (USD 0.066 mi )Total Budget- SLR 46.1 million (USD 0.461 mi )Funding status:
Funds NotAvailable, Local / International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
AEA
Senior Scientific Officer,
Coordinator for Radiological Emergency Management,Atomic EnergyAuthority104

R o a d

E-11

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Erecting Tsunami Warning Towers in Selected
Coastal Areas

Agencies involved:
DMC, District Secretaries, LAs of selected locations

Background and Rationale :With the experience of the December 2004 Tsunami, the necessity has been identified for Tsunami
Warning Towers that would help reducing the victims. The system has to be established forreceiving of the warning from DMC Tsunami Early Warning Centre at the towers erected inselected locations. District, division or LA authorities as relevant, will have the responsibilityfor
onward dissemination of warning and evacuation of vulnerable communities as may be necessary.
The system has to be established and responsible personnel trained. The most vulnerable locations
must be selected for erecting the towers.
In Thailand, warning towers have been erected in 9 provinces linked to the national EW Centre in
Bangkok. This has also assisted in the re-promotion of tourism in areas such as Phuket.

Objective:
To supply and erect tsunami warning towers in 100 selected locations and personnel trained

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
Selected locations along the coast in Sri Lanka

Activities:
a.
b.
c.
d.

Selection of locations for erection of towers
Providing of 100 towers
Establishing the system and fixing responsibilities
Providing training

Output:Tsunami towers in 100 selected locations105

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 350 million (USD 3.5 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 350 million (USD 3.5 mi)

Funding status:
Funds NotAvailable, Local / International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR, Disaster Management Centre (DMC)
District Secretaries, LAs of selected locations

106

Chapter 5
Preparedness and Response Plans

5.1

Key Issues

The objective of disaster preparedness plans is to minimise the adverse effects of a hazard througheffective precautionary measures and adequate responses, to ensure timely and coordinateddelivery of relief and assistance following a disaster.
Preparedness involves the development and regular testing of warning systems (linked to multihazard EWS) and plans for evacuation or other measures to be taken during a disaster alert period.
It also involves the education and training of officials, intervention teams and communities.
Establishment of policies, standards, organizational arrangements and operational plans to be
applied following a disaster are also crucial. Effective plans also consider securing resources,
possibly including stockpiling supplies and earmarking funds. These plans are being supported
through the provisions of the DMAct.
Some of the key issues arising with regard to response and preparedness plans relate tofinances for immediate response and also with systematic building of capacity across alllevels. This includes clearly defining roles for involved agencies to avoid mismanagement,
overlaps and gaps in response to disasters as well as emphasising the coordination of all such
recognised agencies. It is also important to ensure reliable lines of communication including
alternative lines for emergency communication; sensitise the media to the importance ofcorrect information and ensure informant mechanisms for the same. The logistics channel
should be kept prepared for an immediate impact, with needs assessment in the aftermath of adisaster; and a clear role for nation-wide NGOs is to be defined in government responseplans.

107

R o a d

M a p

f o r

5.2

Strategy

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

The identified issues and needs for this theme can be addressed through the following suggested
strategies in the short-medium term:- Provisions in annual budgets of respective line ministries/ agencies through the DM
Plan.
- Identification of skills/ knowledge required in developing an HRD plan.
- Provide equipment and train staff/ volunteers to use them.
- Mapping of resources and materials available with public and private sectors.
- Regulations in place to utilise such equipment as desired by the DM Plan
- Develop and enforce / gazette standard operating procedures for all activities.
- Drills and simulation, to check the system.
- Incident Command System should be well defined.
- Bring clarity about roles and responsibility amongst various actors.
- All stakeholders should be aware of each other's roles and responsibilities.
- Declaration and dissemination of disaster situation at various levels.
- Legal provisions to ensure ownership of media actions.
- Government body to provide standard communication messages.
- One government body to specify items, describe quantities required and expected date of-delivery.
Develop specifications of emergency items, as may be required under different disastersituations.
Gazettes notification/ incorporation of institutional mandate.
Inclusion of SLRCS for specified duties/ responsibilities under Standing Orders.
Inclusion of NGOs/INGOs for specified duties/ responsibilities under Standing Orders/
response plans.

The following components have been identified as essential to the development of acomprehensive action plan for disaster preparedness at the national, sub-national and local levels:
Development of DM (preparedness and response) plans by each ministry/
department and districts/ divisions
Developing emergency response capacities at Provincial, Municipality and UC levels
Establishing a competent cadre of emergency response and DM coordinators at all levels
to extend support to DMC/ District Emergency Operations Rooms
Development of district level emergency services network; establishment of hospitalemergency preparedness mechanism;
Resource network for emergency response
Procedure for sharing of information, manpower and resources108

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

In addition, the following have been prioritised for immediate attention in order to situate longer
term activities within a sustainable framework:
i. Developing and Maintaining a National Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan
Development of a National Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan (NEPRP) will help
various line ministries, departments and agencies, to collaborate in providing needs-based
efficient responses to those in need. This will also help identify a role for organisations like
SLRCS, and International NGOs, in various stages of DM, by defining the mandates of DMC
and concerned line ministries, departments, agencies and other organisations, in managing
various disasters. The plan will define functional roles and responsibilities to each of theseministries and departments, through the different stages of disasters. Further, this will allow
response plans to be prepared for each district, division and vulnerable community, to be linked
to the NEPRP. Since there are various levels of operation and administration, this plan will
formulate Standard Operating Procedures (SoPs), defining the directions in managing disaster
response.
ii. Establishing a 24x7 National Emergency Operation Centre (NEOC) and District Emergency
Operation Rooms
This will involve the setting up of an institutional framework for a response operation, fromtriggering action, providing direction and control, to service delivery through existing ministry
departments/ agencies. Similarly, Emergency Operation Centre (EOC) at the district level will
form a decentralised mechanism for response operations, while maintaining a standard
approach. This will also emphasise development of Standing Orders/ Standard Procedures, toprovide legal status to concerned agencies in order to carry out tasks, while working under EOC
authority, as mandated under the Incident Command System (ICS)

5.3

Project Proposals

The following projects have been identified as essential for disaster preparedness at the national,
sub-national and local levels:
PR-1

Hazard Specific Response Plans
PR-1.1 Cyclone and Tornado Response Plan
PR-1.2 Drought Response Plan
PR-1.3 Flood Response Plan
PR-1.4 Tsunami Response Plan
PR-1.5 Landslides Response Plan
PR-1.6 Lightning and Thunderstorms Response Plan
109

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

PR-2
PR-3
PR-4
PR-5
PR-6
PR-7
PR-8
PR-9
PR-10

National Rapid Response Team
Emergency Operation Centres (EOCs)
Hazard Specific Contingency Plans
Emergency Service Networks (ESNs)
Knowledge Management Systems
Health Sector Preparedness and Response Mechanism
Private Sector Preparedness for Disaster Response
National Radiological and Nuclear Emergency Management Plan
Capacity Building of LocalAuthorities for Emergency Response

PR-11
PR-12
PR-13
PR-14

Provision of Facilities for Storage of Emergency Reserves and Resource Needs
Construction of Multi-purpose Buildings for use as Tsunami Safe Shelters andOther Purposes along the Coastal Zone of the Country
Improvement of Mortuaries in Government Hospitals
Establishment of Nation-wide Emergency Communication System

PR-15

Search and Rescue in Disasters by Sri LankaArmy

PR-16

Strengthening Responses to Oil Pollution, Flood Relief Operations andEnhancing SAR capabilities at Sea

PR-17

110

Provision ofAircraft for Disaster Management Operations andActivities

R o a d

PR-1.1

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Cyclone and Tornado Response Plans

Agencies involved:
DMC, PCs, District/ Divisional Secretariats, LAs, GNs, Line Agencies, Telecom, DoM, NGOs,
Community Based Organisations (CBOs), SLRCS.

Background and rationale:
The geographical location of Sri Lanka makes it less prone to high intensity disasters. However,infrequent events such as the cyclones of 1978 and 2000 and the tornado of 2004 have caused large
scale destruction to lives and livelihoods. The devastation caused by the tsunami of 2004, has
increased the vulnerability of the coastal communities to sea/ tidal surges. Lessons derived frompast response operations to cyclone and tornado events, reflect the importance of putting end to end
warning systems in place, while initiating risk reduction measures towards coastal zone protection,better housing construction, selection of shelter sites and public awareness /dissemination.
The more informed the people, the less threat there is to lives. Still, a multi-hazard consequence
management system is required to help those affected, in a timely and efficient manner. These plans
should be linked to community based risk reduction programmes, to improve the overall risk
reduction scenario, and empower communities to protect their lives and property in the events ofsuch disaster risks.

Objective:a. To make available the coordination and control mechanism to EW / public dissemination
mechanisms, directions, leadership and optimal utilisation of resourcesb. To link DM specific structures with service delivery structures i.e. EOC with emergency
service networks
c. To establish linkages between institutional response and community based response
mechanisms

Time frame:Year 1- 2 (2006-2007) - Short Term

Geographical area of implementation :National, Provincial, District, Village and Community level interventions, in all coastal districts of
Sri Lanka111

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
1
1. Set up technical advisory committees for Cyclone and Tornado Response Plan .
1
2. Facilitate meetings to develop risk profile and risk management approach/ strategy .
2
3. Share guidelines for development of draft district, divisional and local authority level
Response plans.
4. Develop a draft plan, based on, and linking response plans at various levels (District,
Divisions, local authorities) and link with the working group developing SoPs/ Standing
Orders.
5. Field test and finalize the plan.
6. Review and update plan on annual basis/ to include post disaster recommendations.

Output:Cyclone Public Warning and Response Plans are in place at the National level, with appropriate
linkages with Provincial, District, Divisional and Village / Community level plans

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General,
Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

1 Links with Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Assessment & EWS Components
2 Guidelines to include Planning Considerations, Vulnerability assessments, Resource Mapping with public andprivate actors, links with response plans of lower levels (I.e. Village/ Community Plans) etc.
112

R o a d

PR-1.2

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aDrought Response Plan

Agencies involved:
DMC, PCs, District/ Divisional Secretariats, LAs, GNs, NWS&DB, DoM, DoA, ID, NGOs,
CBOs, SLRCS

Background and rationale:
Despite a good average rainfall, Sri Lanka has suffered six major droughts during last 25
years, which have affected over 1.5 million people on an average. Most of the land being rain
fed, the probability of crop failure is very high, due to abnormal variation in rainfall pattern.
There have been very few cases where rains have failed for two or more successive years but
such incidents have caused shortfall in availability of drinking water, usually in areas
dependant on wells, local tanks/ponds and hand pumps. Hambantota, Puttalam, Kurunagala,
Anuradhapura, Monaragala, are some districts which have faced such droughts very often.
While it is easy to forecast crop failure based on rainfall patterns, the institutional response has
been to provide crop seeds, food packets/ cash vouchers and water bowsering. However, there isa need to study the possibility of improving forecasting techniques, so that institutional response
also includes supplementary canal irrigation wherever possible. Improved forecasting will also
help actuate field assessments for effective drought response.

Objectives:a. To provide linkage between drought response plan and forecasting /assessment system.

b. To develop coordination and control mechanism to provide directions, leadership andoptimal utilisation of resources.
c. DMC/EOC linked with service delivery structures i.e. emergency service networks.
d. Linkages between institutional response and community based response established.

Time frame:Year 1- 2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
National, Provincial, District, Village and Community level interventions in the drought-prone
districts of Sri Lanka
113

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
1
1. Set up technical advisory committees for Drought Response Plan .
1
2. Facilitate meetings to develop risk profile and risk management approach/ strategy ,including assessment methodologies, following drought forecasting.
2
3. Share guidelines for development of draft district, divisional and local authority level
response plans, based on field assessments.
4. Develop a draft plan and linking response plans at various levels (District, Divisions, LAs)
and link with the working group developing SoPs/ Standing Orders.
5. Develop approaches where response activities provide long term mitigation i.e. “food forwork” schemes for tank de-silting / deepening etc.
6. Field test and finalise the plan.
7. Review and update plan on annual basis/ to include post disaster lessons/recommendations.

Output:Drought Forecasting, Assessment and Response Plan is in place at the national level, withappropriate linkages with Provincial, District, Divisional and Village / Community level plans.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 10 million(USD 0.10 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
Director General,
Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73 Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

1

Links with Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Assessment & EWS Components

2

Guidelines to include Planning Considerations, Vulnerability assessments, Resource Mapping with public and private actors,
links with response plans of lower levels (I.e. Village/ Community Plans) etc.

114

R o a d

PR-1.3

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Flood Response Plan

Agencies involved:
DMC, PCs, District/ Divisional Secretariats, LAs, GNs, Line Agencies, ID, MASL, Agrarian
Service Department, Sri Lanka Land Reclamation and Development Corporation (SSLRDC),
CMC, DoM, Telecom, NGOs, CBOs, SLRCS

Background and rationale:
Almost every year, some part of Sri Lanka is affected by floods. There have been 38 floods in thelast 48 years, each time killing about 25, and affecting over 170,000 people on an average. The
floods and landslides disaster in May 2003, which was termed as the worst in last sixty years, killed
as many as 235 people in five districts. While the Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC)
study suggests that monitoring of river basins may allow possible forecasting/ early warning, there
is also a need to reduce vulnerability of people living in areas prone to flash floods, throughimproved response mechanisms.
During the floods response operation in 2003, the government provided good coordination
with line ministries, departments, UN bodies, international NGOs, SLRCS/ NGOs, tosuccessfully provide relief. With the establishment of DMC, there is scope to improve searchand rescue, ae well as rehabilitation and reconstruction elements under the DMC framework.

Objectives:a. To develop a coordination and control mechanism providing directions, leadership for
optimal utilisation of resources.
b. To link DMC/EOC with service delivery structures i.e. emergency service networks.
c. To establish suggested linkages between institutional response and community based
response.

Time frame:Year 1- 2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
National, Provincial, District, Village and Community level interventions in the flood-prone
districts of Sri Lanka
115

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
1
1. Set up technical advisory committees for Floods Response Plan .
1
2. Facilitate meetings to develop risk profile and risk management approach/ strategy .
2
3. Share guidelines for development of draft district, divisional and local authority level
response plans.
4. Develop a draft plan, based on, and linking response plans at various levels (District,
Divisions, LAs) with the working group developing SoPs/ Standing Orders.
5. Field test and finalise the plan.
6. Review and update plan on annual basis to include post disaster recommendations.

Output:Floods Response Plan is in place at the National level, with appropriate linkages to Provincial,
District, Divisional and Village / Community level plans.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 10 million(USD 0.10 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
Director General,
Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73 Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

1

Links with Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Assessment & EWS Components

2

Guidelines to include Planning Considerations, Vulnerability assessments, Resource Mapping with public and private actors,
links with response plans of lower levels (I.e. Village/ Community Plans) etc.

116

R o a d

PR-1.4

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Tsunami Response Plan

Agencies involved:
DMC, PCs, District/ Divisional Secretariats, LAs, GNs, Line Agencies, Telecom Department,
DoM, Health Department, Police Department, Armed Forces, NGOs, CBOs, SLRCS, Radio and
SL Rupavahini Channel

Background and rationale:
The tsunami in December 2004 highlighted the need for Sri Lanka to develop a National DM
framework, to enhance its institutional practices to manage such low frequency high intensity
disasters. Although the 26 December tsunami caused the death of over 31,000, theinstitutional response in successful evacuation of population at risk to 28 March 2005
(potential) tsunami warning reflects the capacity of the Sri Lanka government and DM
stakeholders when working together. Vast devastation was caused to natural and man madeprotection in the coastal areas by the 2004 tsunami, further increasing vulnerability of thepeople.
It is in this light that EW and public dissemination have to be improved, in order to minimise
threats to people's life and livelihoods. This will also ensure that the proposed Emergency
Service Network (ESN) will cope with the consequent impact on society.

Objectives:a. Coordination and control mechanism to provide EW/ public dissemination mechanisms,
directions, leadership and optimal utilisation of available resources.
b. DM specific structures linked with service delivery structures i.e. EOC with emergency
service networks.
c. Linkages between institutional response and community based response plans established.

Time frame:Year 1- 2 (2006- 2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
National, Provincial, District, Village and Community level interventions in coastal districts of Sri
Lanka
117

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
1
1. Set up technical advisory committees for the Tsunami Response Plan .
2. Facilitate meetings to develop risk profile and risk management approach/strategy1.
2
3. Share guidelines for development of draft district, divisional and local authority
level response plans as well as the guidelines and strategies for coastal
conservation/ buffer zone development and mitigation)
4. Develop a draft plan, based on, and linking response plans at various levels(District, Divisions, LAs) with the working group developing SoPs/ Standing
Orders.
5. Field test and finalise the plan.
6. Review and update plan on an annual basis to include post disasterrecommendations.

Output:Tsunami EW/ Public dissemination and Response Plans are in place at the National level,with appropriate linkages to Provincial, District, Divisional and Village / Community
level plans.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 10 million(USD 0.10 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
Director General,
Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

1

Links with Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Assessment & EWS Components

2

Guidelines to include Planning Considerations, Vulnerability assessments, Resource Mapping with public and private actors,
links with response plans of lower levels (I.e. Village/ Community Plans) etc.

118

R o a d

PR-1.5

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Landslides Response Plan

Agencies involved:
DMC, PCs, District/ Divisional Secretariats, LAs, GNs, Line Agencies, NBRO, DoM, NGOs,
CBOs, SLRCS.

Background and rationale:
10 districts in Sri Lanka are prone to landslides, thus posing a high risk to people living in theseareas. Three major landslide disaster events in the last 50 years have killed 40 people an averageand caused destruction to infrastructure. While technology and methods are available to monitor
land conditions to avoid potential landslides in most cases, public awareness and institutional
capacity need to be developed and put in place.

Objectives:a. Coordination and control mechanism to provide directions, leadership and optimal
utilisation of resources available.
b. DM specific structures linked with service delivery structures i.e. EOC with emergency
service networks.
c. Linkages between institutional response and community based response established.

Time frame:Year 1-2 (2006- 2007) - Short term: 2 Years

Geographical area:
National, Provincial, District, Village and Community level interventions in the 10 landslide prone
districts of Sri Lanka

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
1
1. Set up technical advisory committees for Landslide Monitoring and Response Plan .
1
2. Facilitate meetings to develop risk profile and risk management approach/ strategy .
2
3. Share guidelines for development of draft district, divisional and LAlevel response plans.
1

Links with Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Assessment & EWS Components

2

Guidelines to include Planning Considerations, Vulnerability assessments, Resource Mapping with public and private actors,
links with response plans of lower levels (I.e. Village/ Community Plans) etc.

119

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

4. Develop a draft plan, based on, and linking response plans at various levels (District,

Divisions, LA) with the working group developing SoPs/ Standing Orders.
5. Field test and finalise the plan.
6. Review and update plan on annual basis/ to include post disaster recommendations.

Output:Landslide Response Plan is in place at the National level, with appropriate linkages with
Provincial, District, Divisional and Village / Community level plans.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 10 million(USD 0.10 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
Director General,
Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

120

R o a d

PR-1.6

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aLightning and Thunderstorms Response Plan

Agencies involved:
DMC, PCs, District/ Divisional Secretariats, LAs, GNs, Line Agencies, Telecom, DoM, NGOs,
CBOs, SLRCS, Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corporation and Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation,
Police Department,Armed Forces

Background and rationale:
Although lightning and thunderstorms are not recorded as a major disaster in Sri Lanka, raw datasuggest that on an average, as many people get killed annually by lightning strikes as in roadaccidents. Habitation in lightning prone, low lying areas compounded by lack of awareness on
preparedness/ prevention measures results in many lives lost every year. While preventive
measures will dictate the success in DM interventions in this sector, mobile health response may
play a crucial role in reaching affected, for improved consequence management.

Objective:a. Coordination and control mechanism to provide directions, leadership and optimal
utilisation of available resources.
b. DM specific structures linked with service delivery structures i.e. EOC with emergency
service networks.
c. Linkages between institutional response and community based response plans established.

Time frame:Year 1-2 (2006- 2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
National, Provincial, District, Village and Community level interventions in most prone areas

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
1
1. Set up technical advisory committees for Lightning and Thunderstorms Response Plan .
1
2. Facilitate meetings to develop risk profile and risk management approach/ strategy .
2

3. Share guidelines for development of draft district, divisional and local authority level

response plans.
1

Links with Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Assessment & EWS Components

2

Guidelines to include Planning Considerations, Vulnerability assessments, Resource Mapping with public and private actors,
links with response plans of lower levels (I.e. Village/ Community Plans) etc.

121

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Develop a draft plan, based on, and linking response plans at various levels (District,
Divisions, local authorities to the working group developing SoPs/ Standing Orders)
5. Field test and finalise the plan.
6. Review and update plan on annual basis to include post disaster recommendations.

4.

Output:Lightning and Thunderstorms Response Plans are in place at the National level, with appropriate
linkages to Provincial, District, Divisional and Village / Community level plans.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 10 million(USD 0.10 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk

122

dgdmcsl@gmail.com

R o a d

PR-2

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

National Rapid Response Team

Agencies involved:
Ministry of DM, DMC, Police, Fire-Search & Rescue Services, Armed Forces, Health, relatedline agencies, service providing agencies, SLRCS, select NGOs.

Background and rationale:
The recent tragedy provided valuable lessons in disaster management to the agencies involved.
Workshops conducted by many agencies on lessons learnt, and the District DM Plan exercise
carried out in some southern /western districts (Matara, Ratnapura, Hambantota etc) havehighlighted the need for skilled personnel to perform specific functions such as search and rescue,and providing technical leadership in contingency situations such as oil spill, hazardous material
accidents, chemical and industrial accidents etc.
Similarly, it is important to identify and train key officials, to lead DM sectoral functions under the
ESN including evacuation, media and information management, mass care (food, health checkups,
water and sanitation activities, community kitchens etc), following Standard Operating Systems /Standing Orders, to remain coordinated by EOCs under DMC. These skilled resources need to bepositioned in relevant vulnerable areas, and equipped appropriately, to carry on desired functions.

Objective:
Effective and efficient disaster response support provided, through strategically positioned, appropriately
skilledandequippedpersonnelofthegovernment,NGOs andSLRCS,coordinatedbyEOCs/DMC.

Time frame:Year 1- 5 (2006-2010) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
National level, district level and municipal council level teams, based in various line agencies,
departments, NGOs and SLRCS branches.

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
1. Identification of specialised skill sets required, for different disasters and contingencies.
2. Establish a core team, with a definite legal mandate. These members should be linked tobroader teams under contingency specific response plans.
123R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a
1

3. Organise capacity building, including equipping the team members and their training on

using such equipments.
4. Standard Operating Systems and Standing Orders / procedures developed.
5. Link with Disaster Response / Contingency plans.
6. Public dissemination of availability of such teams.
7. Develop and share contact/ telephone directory for such team members.
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
8. Carry out refresher training programmes, incorporating field experiences.
9. Appropriate transfer policy to be developed to ascertain availability of skilled people invulnerable areas.

Outputs:
Cross sectoral, multi-agency National Specialised Rapid Response Team in operation for
deployment during disaster / contingency situations.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 10 million(USD 0.10 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

1

Includes resource requirements/ mapping.

124

R o a d

PR-3

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Emergency Operation Centres (EOCs)

Agencies involved:
DMC, District Secretaries,Agencies identified for Emergency Service Networks.

Background and rationale:
During the last four years, Sri Lanka has experienced about seven disasters, requiring
intervention at the national and international levels. The Sri Lanka government has managed
these disasters well, but issues still remain unaddressed in terms of improving theinstitutionalised response and mitigation measures, so that in-country efforts are sufficient inaddressing community needs of most of these disasters.
The DM Act passed in May 2005 has paved the way for establishment of a DMC in Colombo, tolead the process of institutionalising DM. Under the scope of the National Disaster Response
Plan, establishment of EOCs at DMC is a priority. Establishment of EOCs at national and districtlevels will be helpful in taking a lead in activating the response operation and through the Incident
Command System (ICS) provide necessary direction and control in utilising resources available/acquired, to reach affected and vulnerable populations. Through the ICS, EOCs will help
coordinate disaster response, taking support from various line ministries/ agencies, departments,
identified NGOs and SLRCS branches, through coordination meetings at various levels,
depending upon the scale of disaster/ contingencies. Creation of a disaster resources network for
emergency/ disaster response that captures information on manpower and resources along withestablished procedures for sharing them will be useful to enhance effectiveness of response.

Objective:a. To institute Incident Command System at National and District levels.
b. To assign responsibilities to focal bodies.
c. Develop institutional framework and coordination mechanism to facilitate delivery of
emergency related services, based on assessment of scale of disaster / contingency andconsequent community needs.
d. Develop a resources network for emergency response

Time frame:Year 1-3 (2006-2008) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
Country-wide, especially at DMCs and all District Secretariats.
125

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
1. Specific role for the EOC and the ICS to be defined and adopted.
2. Infrastructure to be provided
3. SoPs / institutional tools to be made available to the centre.
4. Field testing and regular drills to be instituted.
5. Provision for financial resources to activate any response/ contingency plans, together
with continuous (24X7) monitoring.
6. Hiring consultants / subject experts for Standing Orders/ SoPs
7. Establishment of EOCs at DMC and 25 districts
8. Office equipments for DMC/ district EOCs.
9. Consultative meetings amongst ESN team leaders/ focal persons-2 at National and 2 eachat district EOCs.
10. Communication equipments for EOCs
11. Study tours / exposure visits of EOCs/ ESN members within the region.
12. Identify agencies with material and human resources for emergency response
13. Involve such relevant agencies in designing database of available resources and protocol
for sharing the resources at the times of emergency
14. Design and operationalise the resources network for emergency response

Output:Setting up of ICS- an institutional framework for a Response Operation, from triggering action,
providing direction and control, to service delivery through existing ministry departments/
agencies. Similarly, EOCs at district level forms a decentralized mechanism for response
operations, while maintaining a standard approach. This will also emphasise development ofStanding Orders/ Standard Procedures, to provide legal status to concerned agencies, to carry outtasks, while working under EOC authority.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 35 million (USD 0.35 mi)Year 3 (2008)- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 45 million (USD 0.45 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact person in lead and participating agencies
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk dgdmcsl@gmail.com
126

District Secretaries
Line Ministries/
Agencies for Emergency Service Networks

R o a d

PR-4

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Hazard Specific Contingency Plans

Agencies involved:
DMC
Relevant EOCs in districts, District / Divisional Secretaries, LAs
Agencies responsible for various hazard and risk assessments
Ministry of Health, Provincial Ministries of Health, Ministry of Education, Police Department/
Armed Forces, Fire Services, Department of Motor Traffic, CEB, NWSDB, RDA/ PRDAs, Sri
Lanka Telecom, LAs, Department of Social Services, SLRCS, St. John Ambulance Services,
NGOs, private sector agencies

Background and rationale:
Disasters have affected not just common people and their property but vulnerable public
infrastructure as well. When some departments are required to provide essential services to people,
collapse of their own infrastructure, and those of private sector may pose serious problems inmeeting the increased demand of their services.
As a growing economy, Sri Lanka has provided many opportunities for business development,
including the tourism industry. Increased purchase power, tourism and business activities haveresulted in higher number of vehicles plying on Sri Lankan roads, posing a threat to the community
on and along main and sub highways.
Institutional plans for both the public and private sector, which aim at safeguarding their own
infrastructure (Human & Knowledge resources, equipments/ machinery/ mobility etc), andmanaging increasing service delivery load are a prime requirement to ensuring an informed anddependable response. DMC aims to support private sector, government and key institutions, intheir mitigation/ preparedness plans, by providing technical assistance.

Objective:
Develop and put in place mitigation and preparedness measures for private sector, key
government ministries, departments, agencies, boards, thus safeguarding their facilities,
to minimise damage and maintain readiness for service delivery as and when mandated.
To strengthen operational capacities of identified departments/ agencies to activate therespective contingency planTo establish linkages with ESNTime frame:Year 1-5 (2006-2010) -Short and Medium term
127

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
Entire country, especially hazard prone areas
Phase-1:All key government ministries, departments, agencies, boards, private sector involvedin emergency services.
Phase-2:All other government ministries, departments, agencies, boards and private sector

Activities
1. Each ministry, department, agency, private sector institution to start mapping of capacities

and risk exposure to their service establishments
2. Develop institutional safety plans to protect/ limit damage to its own infrastructure/ facilities
3. Develop contingency plans to maintain organisational readiness, to be in a position to offer
services as and when required
4. Develop public warning/ awareness system for each type of contingency.
5. Provide legal base for self compliance to contingency plans.
6. Establishing and strengthening monitoring capacities of responsible government / private
sector entities.
7. Improve social protection/ safety net through insurance.

Output:Institutional framework put in place, to reduce loss to infra-structural damage to concerned
government ministries, departments, agencies, boards, including humans, equipments, officeestablishments, machinery and other matters in use. Hazard specific/ contingency plans put inplace with various line ministries, departments and government agencies, as required by Sri Lanka
DMAct 2005
a. National Oil Spill Contingency Planb. National Industrial and Chemical Hazard Management Permitc. National Radiological and Nuclear Emergency Management Plan
d. Forest Fire Management Plane. Dam related Hazards
f. Biological Hazard Management Plan
g. Urban Fire Suppression And Management Plan
h. Road Traffic Accident Management Plan
i. Epidemics
j. Explosion/ Bomb blasts128

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Budget:Year 1-5 (2006-2010) - SLR 100 million(USD 1.00 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 100 million (USD 1.00 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
District Secretaries

129R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PR-5

i n

S r i L a n k a

Emergency Service Networks (ESNs)

Agencies involved:
Control and Direction: DMC/ relevant EOCs in districts.
Search and Rescue & Evacuation: Fire Service Department of the area/Armed Forces/Police
Communication: Sri Lanka Telecom, Police Department, SLRCSSocial Welfare/ Mass Care, Victim Identification, Tracing & Family Re-union: Social Service
Department, with SLRCS, NGOs/ INGOs
Health and Medical Care: Provincial / Line Ministries of Health, SLRCS.
Psychosocial Support: Ministry of Health, SLRCS
Utilities: CEB, NWSDB, LAs.
Site Command and Control:- Inner Circle: Fire Service- Outer Circle: Police Department/Armed Forces
Public Warning Dissemination: DMC with media, Police Departments, SLRCS etc
Resource Management: DMC/ EOCs.

Background and rationale:
There is an urgent need to instutionalize response to hazard situations and mitigation measures in the
country. DMC has been established in Colombo, after the DM Act of May 2005. As per the the National
Emergency Preparedness andResponsePlan,EOCs areto besetup atDMC and districtlevels.
As previous response operations reflect, strengthening existing agencies and linking Sri Lanka Red Cross
branches and NGOs will help improve services delivery to affected during disasters for evacuation, masscare, victims identification/ tracing and family re-union, water and sanitation, healthcare etc. National anddistrictEOCs willcoordinateroles andscopeoftheseagencies in theaffected areas.

Objective:
Develop institutional framework, to provide essential emergency services to affected
and vulnerable population, as and when necessity arises, under different disasters /contingencies.
Establish emergency service networks and assign responsibilities to focal bodies
Develop scale and type of community needs under different disaster scenarios andinstitutional framework to provide services as per necessity

Time frame:Year 1-5 (2006- 2010) - Short and Medium term
130

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country; commencing from the most disaster-prone districts

Activities:
1. Set up a Technical Advisory Committee to identify scale and type of community needs

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

under different emergency scenarios and identify focal departments/ bodies to carry out/
provide services under these sectors.
Identify team leader for each such sectoral service agency/ department at National/ Districtlevels.
Establish operational linkages / mechanisms EOC/ DMC for role under response andcontingency plans.
Hire consultants / subject experts for Standing Orders/ SoPs
Hold consultative meetings amongst ESN team leaders/ focal persons (2 at National and 2
each at District EOCs).
Organising study tours / exposure visits of EOCs/ESN members within the region.

Output:ESN (Warning, Evacuation, Mass Care, Health and Medical Care, Public Warning etc)
assigned responsibilities to focal bodies.
Institutional framework developed, to provide essential emergency services to affected andvulnerable populations, as and when the need arose, under different disasters /contingencies.
Scale and type of community needs under different disaster scenarios assessed andinstitutional framework to provide services developed

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 100 million (USD 1.0 mi)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 100 million (USD 1.0 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 200 million (USD 2.0 mi)

Funding status:
Local / international Funds Required.

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

131R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PR-6

i n

S r i L a n k a

Knowledge Management Systems

Agencies involved:
DMC, agencies involved in disaster response and mitigation programmes, research organizations/academicians /experts on DMC panel, SLRCS

Background and rationale:
Disaster preparedness is seen as an active, on-going process of dynamic ventures and needs to bereviewed, modified, updated and tested on a regular basis. This requires improvements in the
response plans, by monitoring changes in hazard risks owing to environmental trends and/ or
mitigation measures undertaken by various partners. To ascertain that each disaster response plan
incorporates lessons from previous operations, and to provide feedback to improve preparedness
and scope of mitigation programmes, institutionalisation of such knowledge management has been
identified as a key programme area.

Objective:
Effectiveness of response operation to be improved regularly.
Mitigation measures to be recommended, learning from disaster response experience.

Time frame:Year 3- 5 (2008- 2010) - Medium Term (Continuous Institutional Process)Geographical area:
The entire country especially prone areas

Activities:
1. Organise a multi stakeholder National level workshop to:i) Develop an institutional mechanism to carry out lessons learned workshops,

after every disaster response operation, based on standard methodology.
ii) Develop mechanisms to record, interpret and transfer such knowledge into Disaster
Response and Mitigation Planning in the country.
iii) Review / renegotiate institutional framework, as required.
2. Organise district wise meetings, to communicate and establish local mechanisms tooperationalise such measures.
3. Publish and disseminate lessons learned, suggest improvements in mitigation measures,and decide on changes in institutional framework after every disaster or every year,
whichever is earlier.
132

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Outputs:
Knowledge management system established to update the National Response plans,
incorporating lessons learned / updation
Institutional Framework established to record, analyse, interpret and act upon knowledge
generated through lessons learned after every disaster with:- Lead agency identified to carry out this task at the District and National levels, depending
upon scale of disaster.
- Methodology standardised, to organise such events.
- Communication protocols established to ascertain incorporation of knowledge
management systems into DM framework at all levels.

Budget:Year 1-3 (2008-2010) - SLR 2.5 million (USD 0.025 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 2.5 million (USD 0.025 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

133

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PR-7

i n

S r i L a n k a

Health Sector Preparedness and Response Mechanism

Agencies involved:
Ministry of Healthcare and Nutrition, Provincial Ministries of Health, Universities, NGOs

Background and rationale:
Health services are expected to play a major role in the event of disasters. The services thus
provided include the provision of emergency medical care, burial and cremation of the dead, waterand sanitation services, vector and pest control activities, food hygiene, prevention ofcommunicable diseases to name a few.
Experiences during the recent Tsunami have clearly indicated that, though the principles of DM
remain unaltered over time, practical aspects of the same need to be reviewed carefully for their
better application to suite current needs, challenges and opportunities.
Though the health services possessed reasonably adequate resources and the health workers
responded to the immediate needs effectively, there were pockets of areas where services were notreached due to many reasons including the problems of coordination. Further, basic knowledge andskills on emergency response of health workers were not updated adequately to enable them torespond efficiently and effectively.
In this context, it is extremely important for the health sector to focus on the establishment of asystem capable of a rapid, efficient and well-prepared response to save life and to restore andmaintain a healthy environment following a disaster.

Objectives:
1. To reduce the loss of lives and the effects of injuries as result of disasters
2. To restore the health of the affected people as early as possible
3. To ensure that all relevant health sector institutions and organizations are capable ofresponding to disasters rapidly and effectively, and
4. To ensure that they are prepared to respond to any emergency

Time frameYear 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short and Medium term
All activities except research need to be completed in the years 1 and 2. Monitoring, evaluation, andthe community awareness activities will be a continuous process. Research would be carried out ona priority basis throughout the implementation period134R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
National and district level activities in the year 1
Peripheral level activities in the year 2

Activities:
Disaster Preparedness
a. Establishment of health sector DM committees and action groups
b. Review and updating laws, regulations and by laws related to the health sector
preparedness
c. Improving the resilience and response capacity of health institutions
d. Training of health staff
e. Compilation of an inventory of resources for health sector disaster management
f. Networking with other relevant agencies
g. Establishment of the emergency operation rooms at all levels
h. Strengthening the Risk analysis process related to health sector preparedness and response
i. Preparation of DM plans at all sub national levels
j. Preparation of disaster/emergency preparedness plans and response plans at institutionallevel
k. Conducting community awareness programmes
l. Conducting research related to health sector disaster preparedness and response
Disaster Response
m. Preparation of SOPs for emergency response and relief
n. Establishment of special teams for rapid deploymento. Preparation of plans for mass casualty management at hospital level
p. Networking among relevant agencies on disaster response and relief

Outputs:
Preparedness
a. Health sector DM committees and action groups at all levels establishedb. Laws, regulations and by laws on health sector DM are complied and continuously updatedc. Capacity of health sector institutions and staff of all levels for disaster preparedness andresponse is improved to expected level.
d. Inventory of resources for health sector DM compiled and updatede. Emergency operation rooms at national and district level establishedf. Disaster preparedness plans and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms of all levels preparedg. Community level action groups to assist health services established135R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Response
h. SOPs for Emergency response and relief and for handling of dead bodies preparedi. Special teams for deployment establishedj. Emergency plans for mass casualty management at hospitals preparedk. Active communication and coordination links with relevant agencies on DM and relief areestablished

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 100 million (USD 1.0 mi)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 100 million (USD 1.0 mi)
Total budget- SLR 200 million (USD 2.0 mi)

Funding status:
Local and International Funding Required

Contact persons:Additional Secretary (Medical Services)
Ministry of Health and Nutrition,
385, Rev. Baddegama Wimalawansa Thero Mawatha,
Colombo 10. Tel: +94-11-269 3175 Fax: +94-11-269 1605

136

R o a d

PR-8

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Private Sector Preparedness for Disaster Response

Agencies involved:
DMC, Provincial Councils, LocalAuthorities, Business communities

Background and rationale:
In the aftermath of a disaster the government's primary responsibility is to restore basic public services
before rendering assistance to the private sector. Direct aid to individual businesses is not on the priority
list of the government response system as its priority is the community at large. In such a situation it isevident that the private sector business community should be self sufficient, at least for a minimum of
several days after a disaster occurs and be prepared for rapid recovery after a disaster.This can be achievedby organizing themselves as a private sector, self-help association funded by themselves.The goal of sucha body basically could be, "to provide a forum for information exchange to enhance emergency
preparedness and contingencyplanning within thebusiness community".
As an example a similar organization is in existence and functioning in the City of Los Angeles
in USA. This started at a meeting in 1983 the Mayor had with a group of business leaders to
discuss disaster preparedness. This group subsequently became a steering committee andformed the Business and Industry Council for Emergency Planning and Preparedness (BICEPP)
established as a private sector, self-help association funded by annual sponsorship donations.
BICEPP later evolved into a non-profit corporation, lead by an Executive Committee and a
Board of Directors. They organise seminars and workshops specifically designed to promote
emergency management, planning, education, and training. It has its own Website.
Locally, such organisations in the form of Traders' Associations etc. are presently in existence intownships, urban areas, in districts, provinces and at national level. Two samples of national level
organizations are National Construction Association of Sri Lanka and the Ceylon Chamber ofCommerce. However, these organisations do not function with this particular goal.
DMC through the network of local authorities can promote encouraging such associations,particularly at urban or township level to reorganize themselves, or to form new associations withthis particular goal of disaster response.

Objectives:
1. To promote existing associations at different levels to take up disaster preparedness as
one major goal with the aim of being self sufficient after a disaster at least for 7 days and to bedisaster resilient so that they could recover within the minimum possible time after a disaster137

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

2. To promote business community to form new associations with this particular goal ofdisaster response as above.

Time Frame:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities :1. Identify and establish contacts with the existing national and local level trade or businessorganisations
2. Forming new associations among business communities at local and national levels where
they do not exist
3. Meetings and workshops for awareness creation providing guidance and assistance to havetheir own plans for responding to disasters and for rapid recovery after a disaster
4. Assistance to organize themselves to provide a forum for information exchange to enhance
emergency preparedness and contingency planning within the business community
5. Monitoring and ensuring sustenance of these associations and their preparedness forpossible disasters

Outputs:
1. New associations formed among business communities at local and national levels
2. Existing associations among business communities identified
3. Guidance and assistance provided to have their own plans for responding to disasters andfor rapid recovery after a disaster
4. Assistance provided to organize themselves to provide a forum for information exchange
to enhance emergency preparedness

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 1 million (USD 0.02 mi)
Total budget- SLR 2 million (USD 0.02 mi)

Funding status:
Local or International Funding Required138

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aContact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570/ 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
Chief Secretaries of Provincial Councils
Mayors / Chairmen, Municipal Commissioners / Secretaries of LocalAuthorities
Business Communities

139R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PR-9

i n

S r i L a n k a

National Radiological and Nuclear
Emergency Management Plan

Agencies involved:
DMC, Atomic Energy Authority (AEA), Department of Meteorology, Armed Forces, Police,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Science & Technology, all otherrelevant agencies

Background and rationale:
The Radiological Accidents involved with ionizing radiation sources used in radiation
facilities in Sri Lanka and explosion of Radioactive Disposal Devices (Dirty Bombs) used by
the terrorists could result in serious radiation health effects (short-term or long-term) ofworkers and members of the public and contamination of the environment.
Nuclear Reactor Accident in a neighboring country like India and Pakistan will not have an
immediate effect to Sri Lanka as the nearest reactor under operation and to be operational is notvery close to have short-term health effects. However, it is possible that radioactive material
can be deposited in some parts of Sri Lanka causing long-term exposure of people which could
result in an increase of probability of induction of cancers.
Therefore, timely actions should be taken to respond to the consequences of accidents that canoccur within Sri Lanka and outside Sri Lanka.

Objective:
To establish an organized emergency response capability for timely and coordinated actions of Sri
Lanka authorities to,
Reduce the risk or mitigate the consequences of the accidents
Prevent serious deterministic health effects (e.g. death) due to accident in radiation
facilities.
Reduce the likely stochastic health effects (e.g. cancer) as much as reasonably
achievable.

Time frame:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area:
National, Provincial, District and Facility Level interventions
140

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

Set-up emergency planning committee to develop radiological emergency response plan.
Obtain expert missions and study tours of the region.
Facilitate meetings to develop risk profile, planning basis and allocation of
responsibilities.
Develop a draft plan based on and linking with the NDMC plan and the plans of various
levels. (Facility, relevant Govt.Agencies etc.)
Inform all other agencies, institutions and facilities by meetings and seminars.
Purchasing necessary equipment.
Test plans and procedures and finalize the plan.
Conduct awareness programme for relevant personnel and training programmes.

Outputs:
Radiological and Nuclear Emergency Response Plan is in place at national level with appropriate
linkage with the plan of DMC, facilities and other relevant Govt. authorities.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 10 million (USD 0.1 mi)
Total budget- SLR 10 million (USD 0.1 mi)

Funding status:
Local and International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
AEA
Chairman,Atomic EnergyAuthority
Senior Scientific Officer,
Coordinator for Radiological Emergency Management,AEA
Participating agencies:
DMC, Director General, Department of Meteorology
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Health
Ministry of ForeignAffairs
Department of Police141R o a d

M a p

f o r

PR-10

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aCapacity Building of Local Authorities for
Emergency Response

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, DMC, Provincial Councils (PCs), LAs, Provincial Commissioner of Local
Governance (PCLGs), Sri Lanka Institute of Local Governance (SLILG)

Background and rationale:
In the past disasters, especially in the recent tsunami and the 2003 flood and landslide disaster, it
was seen that the LAs are not equipped to respond to different emergency situations. Even sharingof equipment with other LAs was out of the question due to very limited facilities generally in all
LAs. In this context, it is justifiable to assess and provide the required response equipment; at least
for major authorities selected in a manner so as they could facilitate the others in the periphery as
and when the need arises. Generally, the equipment will include ambulances, water bowsers, water
pumps, fire engines, fire fighting equipments / accessories (hoses with jets, ladders etc.), fire
extinguishers, rowing boats, motor boats with engines, life jackets, backhoes etc. Compatibility of
relevant specific types of machines provided to different authorities has to be considered. The
coupled need for additional staff requirements at LAs, training, buildings for parking of equipment
and staff, fund requirement for O&M etc must be considered. The basis for provision of equipment
to different LAs would be as follows:
CategoryA- Major MCs (4 LAs):
To be equipped with a fully paramedic ambulance with basic life saving (BLS) facilities, fully
equipped fire engines with water tender equipment plus foam extinguisher (complete fire brigade)with all necessary support equipment and heavy road clearing and other equipment, flood
preparedness equipment and gear.
Category B - Balance MCs and major UCs (24 LAs):
To be equipped with medium ambulance, fire engines, with all necessary support equipment andheavy road clearing and other equipment including a crane, flood preparedness equipment and gear
Category C - Other UCs and major PSs (200 LAs):
To be equipped with medium ambulance, fire engines, with all necessary support equipment andheavy road clearing and other equipment, flood preparedness equipment and gear
Category D - Small and medium PSs (60 LAs):
To be equipped with trailer mounted fire trucks, with necessary support equipment and heavy roadclearing and other equipment, flood preparedness equipment and gear

Objective:
To build capacity of LAs for Emergency Response by providing equipment required for response
activities in the respective LAs taking the hazards prevalent in the area in to consideration.
142

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aTime frame of implementation:
Year 1 - 10 (2006-2015) - Short, Medium and Long term

Geographical area of implementation:
Stage I LAs of CategoryA, B & a part of C
Stage II LAs of Category C- selectedStage III LAs of Category C- remaining and Category D

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) : LAs of CategoryA, B & a part of C
a. Assessment of the requirementb. Strategy for supply by categorisation of equipment and phasing out
c. Recruitment and Training of staff by relevant MCs and major UCs selected for Stage I
d. Supplying for LAs selected for Stage I
e. Identifying and requesting annual maintenance funds required for each LAof Stage I
Year 3-5 (2008-2010): LAs of Category C- selected
f. Recruitment and Trainingof staff by selected UCs and major PSs relevant to Stage II
g. Supplying for LAs relevant to Stage II
h. Identifying and requesting annual maintenance funds required for each LAof Stage II
Year 6-10 (2011-2015): LAs of Category C- remaining and Category D
i. Recruitment and Training of staff by UCs and PSs selected for Stage III
j. Supplying for LAs relevant to Stage III
k. Identifying and requesting annual maintenance funds required for each LAof Stage III

Output:Equipment provided for selected LAs followed by recruitment of staff and training provided

Budget (indicative):
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 6000 million (USD 60.0 mi)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 6000 million (USD 60.0 mi)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015) - SLR 6000 million (USD 60.0 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 18000 million (USD 180.0 mi)

Funding status:International / Local Funds Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR, Director General, Disaster Management Centre (DMC), Ministry of Provincial
Councils and Local Government.
143

R o a d

M a p

f o r

PR-11

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aProvision of Facilities for Storage ofEmergency Reserves and Resource Needs

Agencies involved:
Disaster Management Centre (DMC), Provincial Councils and District Secretaries of selected
locations

Background and rationale:
As is evident in past disasters, especially in the recent tsunami and the 2003 flood and landslidedisaster, there is a grave need for store houses in the affected areas for storing of different relief
items. As a result of not having such facilities, some of the relief materials were just lying idle ingovernment offices without adequate protection. Another fact is that in a planned preparedness
situation it is required to store and keep various non-perishable materials, food items, etc. inreadiness for use in case of a crisis.
Such storing facilities are not available even in central locations in different regions of the country
presently. As such there is a need for providing such facilities at selected locations so that supplies
could be sent to the needed disaster affected areas from those locations. Such stores facilities
should be constructed conforming to relevant specifications.

Objective:
To provide warehouse facilities of 2000m2 (20,000ft2) in each of the selected locations for storing
emergency resource materials for distribution during a crisis or disaster situation.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
Selected locations in Kandy, Hambantota, Anuradhapura, Kalutara, Ampara, Jaffna, Trincomalee
and Ratnapura

Activities:
a.
b.
c.
d.
144

Selection of locations
Identification of types of storage materials
Design of facilities to suit the needs
Construction of the facilities of 2000m2 each, in selected locations (Total 16000m2)

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Output:Storehouses for storage of emergency resource needs in selected locations

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 160 million (USD 1.6 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 160 million (USD 1.6 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR, Disaster Management Centre (DMC)
Provincial Councils (PCs), District Secretaries of selected locations

145

R o a d

M a p

f o r

PR-12

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aConstruction of Multi-purpose Buildings for use as
Tsunami Safe Shelters and Other Purposes in Selected
Locations along the Coastal Zone

Agencies involved:
Disaster Management Centre (DMC), Provincial Councils and District Secretaries, LAs of
selected locations

Background and rationale:
As revealed during studies after the December 2004 Tsunami, lands in some coastal areas are very
flat for several miles from the coast inwards and it will not possible to find high ground to be
identified as safe shelter for communities to be evacuated to in case of a tsunami. In community
awareness programmes, the disaster managers at district and divisional levels should be able toindicate such safe ground or safe places to the communities so that they could be trained forevacuation identifying ways of evacuating them to safe shelter. Unfortunately such high grounds
do not exist in some parts of the country, especially the Eastern and Southern Provinces.
There is a dire need to provide such places and except constructing elevated post-tsunami
buildings, there is no other alternative. A feasible approach would be to construct 2 to 3 storeyedbuildings in selected locations and these buildings should be of post-tsunami category, i.e., built
strong enough to withstand the forces of tsunami. Alternative uses can be planned for normal times.
Floors could be rented out at low rates that the people can afford and the income earned can be usedin maintaining the building and facilities. The height of the building and the number of floors may
be decided considering the tsunami wave height in the location.
During a tsunami the building should be able to accommodate about 2000 people. While this will be
used as an evacuation centre on receipt of early warning, during and after the emergency period it
can serve as a temporary camps. The concrete flat roof also can be used as safe area for gathering
during tsunami. In the locations in the eastern province which is cyclone prone, such buildings canbe used as cyclone safe shelter as well for people to gather on issue of early warning of cyclones, as
most of the village houses are not cyclone proof.
For normal times, the ground floor may be planned for shops, 1st and 2nd floors can be planned toaccommodate facilities such as Reception Hall which the community can use for weddings andother function, Community Centre, Health Clinic, Library and area for renting out for tuition
classes etc. Some use can be decided for the concrete flat roof for normal times with a temporary
roof if needed.
146

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Essential facilities for about 2000 people should be provided in the building, such as 50 toilets, 50
washrooms and water tanks with adequate number of water taps. There should be access and large
entrances to the building from all 4 sides to avoid congestion during entry to the building fromsurrounding areas on receipt of tsunami early warning. The total floor area of such a building would
be around 1500 m2 (15,000 ft2).

Objective:
To construct buildings as elevated safe shelters for evacuation during a tsunami in 20 selected
locationsTime frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 ( 2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
Selected geographic locations in the country

Activities:
a. Selection of locations of flat land for long stretches without natural high land Highest
prone locations with experience of 2004 Tsunamib. Decision on the types of usage of floor during normal timesc. Design of facilities to suit the needs22d. Construction of the buildings - 1000m each, in 20 selected locations (Total 20,000 m )Output:Dual purpose buildings in 20 selected locations

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 600 million (USD 6.0 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 600 million (USD 6.0 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR, Disaster Management Centre (DMC)
Provincial Councils (PCs), District Secretaries, LAs of selected locations
147

R o a d

M a p

f o r

PR-13

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Improvement of Mortuaries in Government
Hospitals

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, DMC, Ministry of Healthcare and Nutrition

Background and rationale:
In the aftermath of the recent tsunami it was seen that in hospitals in the affected areas the capacity
and conditions of mortuaries was extremely inadequate for keeping the dead bodies until they wereidentified by the relatives of the victims. There is a need to improve and enhance the capacities ofmortuaries wherever they are available and to provide such facilities where such facilities are notavailable at present. Such facilities should be adequately provided with cooling systems andplacing the bodies in a systematic manner.
In addition there is a need for such mobile mortuaries as well so that these could be taken to theaffected areas.

Objective:
To provide mortuaries of different capacities as required in different categories of hospitals, suchas national hospitals and base hospitals; and to provide 10 mobile mortuaries of suitable capacity totransport dead bodies after a disaster.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:
a. Selection of hospitals
b. Supplying of facilities

Output:Capacity and conditions of mortuaries improved in selected hospitals, new facilities provided ;mobile facilities provided for transport to required areas after disasters148

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 150 million (USD1.50 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 150 million (USD 1.50 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR- Secretary
DMC- Director General
Ministry of Healthcare and Nutrition

149R o a d

M a p

f o r

PR-14

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Establishment of Nation-wide Emergency
Communication System

Agencies involved:
DMC, Provincial Councils, LocalAuthorities, District Secretaries, Divisional Secretaries

Background and rationale:
During a disaster fixed line and mobile communication facilities may get affected and cease tofunction, as was evident in the 2003 Flood and Landslide disaster as well as 2004 Tsunami disaster.
Such a situation could affect the quality of the emergency response due to lack of proper
communication among the main actors. Therefore it is proposed to establish a radio
communication system linking DMC with Provincial Councils, District Secretariats, Local
Authorities, Divisional Secretariats and other stakeholders.
This will cover 8 Provincial Councils, and 25 District Secretariats and priority Divisional
Secretariats and LAs. The requirements include base stations, hand-held radio sets and supporting
equipment such as repeaters etc.

Objective:
To provide a fail-safe communication system to disaster managers by establishing a country-wide
radio communication system, linking all relevant stakeholders.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country, in a phased manner

Activities:
a. Identify exact requirements of Provinces, Districts, Divisions and LAs with DMC EOC as
the main focal point.
b. Supply the needed equipment, in a phased manner.
150

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Output:Anationwide radio communication system in place

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 100 million (USD1.0 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 100 million (USD 1.0 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR- Secretary
DMC- Director General151R o a d

M a p

f o r

PR-15

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Search and Rescue in Disasters by Sri Lanka Army

Agency involved:
Sri LankaArmy, DMC

Background and rationale:
As revealed during studies flash floods occur during monsoon period mainly in general areas ofSouthern and Sabaragamuwa Province and Kalutara Districts and military assistance is sought torescue lives and property. Similarly during the Tsunami and during the bomb explosions in
Colombo, Military assistance is vital for rescuing lives and improving communication and mobility
to reach affected area.
There is a need for Fiber Glass Boats, Out Board Motors (OBMs), Heavy Duty Power Saws, Life
Jackets and Luminous Jackets to facilitate approach to the locations is to facilitate operations where
rescue assistance to the effected people and provision food and medicines is a requirement. There isalso a need for Concrete Breakers, Backhoes, Cranes, and Excavators and other earth moving
machinery and equipment to facilitate rescue operations and bailey bridges for bridging the Dry/
Wet gaps across which the existing structures have destroyed.

Objective:
To rescue lives and access the affected areas

Time frame for implementation:
Year 1- 10 (2006 – 2015) -Short, Medium and Long term

Geographical areas of implementation:
Colombo and selected cities and locations in the country and the costal areas.

Activities:
a.
b.
c.

Purchase of the identified equipment
Selection of locations at which rescue equipment and teams are to be locatedTraining and formulating drills for rescue operations.

Output:Establish rescue teams in selected areas.
152R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Budget:Year 1 – 2 (2006 – 2007)
Year 3 – 5 (2008 – 2010)
Year 5 – 8 (2011 – 2014)
Total Budget-

SLR 207 million (USD 2.07 mi)
SLR 210 million (USD 2.10 mi)
SLR 220 million (USD 2.20 mi)
SLR 637 million (USD 6.37 mi)

Funding status:International / Local Funds Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director Operations, Directorate of Operations,Army Headquarters, Colombo.
DMC

153

R o a d

M a p

f o r

PR-16

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aStrengthening Responses to Oil Pollution, Flood Relief
Operations and Enhancing SAR capabilities at Sea

Agencies involved:
M/DM & HR, DMC, Sri Lanka Navy (SLN), Maritime Pollution PreventiveAuthority (MPPA)
Sri Lanka Coast Guard (SLCG), Sri Lanka PortsAuthority (SLPA)

Background and rationale:a. Oil Pollution Prevention :Threat of Oil pollution has been a phenomenal problem for several years. Oil in the oceans is one of
the ugliest forms of marine pollution and with the rapid development and the negligence of the sea
farers this may assume disastrous proportions in future. It is necessary to curtail this threat on one
side with awareness creation among those involved and on the other formulate mitigatory actions
in general and in the event of a spill. Finding a solution to oil pollution at sea is vital importance to
Sri Lanka especially considering the heavy marine traffic on her Southern shores.
Oil pollution is either accidental or deliberate. Since Sri Lanka being an island and with a larger
number of oil tankers and other ships sailing through her waters and a fairly large fishingcommunity utilizing mechanized boats the risk of oil pollution is very high. Oil is extremely bad forthe marine environment. Oil exposure damages animal fur and feathers so they cannot stay warm
and many of these oiled animals will die by freezing to death. Other problems include accidental
poisoning by ingesting oil, blindness from oil exposure, liver damage and other disabilities.
There are many different types of equipment and methods in cleaning up oil pollution. Biologicaloil agents help break down the oil so it degrades faster and do less damage to the environment. Oilbooms and absorbents assist in containment and absorption of spilled oil. Skimmers skim thesurface oils in an oil spill while gelling agents react with oil to form solids which can be cleaned up
by suction equipment and so forth. Dispersants break oil into droplets where they will do less harm
to other organisms. The last method of oil spill cleanup is elbow grease. This method involves
people physically cleaning the shores with high pressure water hoses, cleaning oil animals and soforth. Physically cleaning oil on shores is time consuming and very expensive and it can also
damage the shoreline further by killing and disturbing any animals left alive after the spill. All thesemethods require equipment and other resources.
b. Flood Response:
Sri Lanka faces flood situations annually and a significant number of persons suffer from such bothin terms of life and property. Being exposed to number of various categories of floods, Sri Lanka is
yet to handle this situation effectively. SLN has been involved in the process of assisting theGovernment during such situations by utilizing its available manpower and resources. Sri Lanka
Navy has been playing an active and efficient role in the past flood situations in the country to date154

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k awith limited resources available. Sri Lanka Navy is in need of the identified resources like
dinghies, outboard motors in addition to the resources available.
c. Search and Rescue (SAR) at sea:
Sri Lanka being the commercial hub in South East Asia, many ships plying between international
ports pass through its waters, and due to heavy maritime traffic these ships are vulnerable tomaritime accidents. Further due to the large number of fishing vessels operated without adequate
safety and proper communication facilities, SAR operations becomes frequently necessary. Sri
Lanka Navy is the organization responsible for assisting SAR in and around Sri Lankan waters anddue to non availability of dedicated vessels / craft for the above purpose in other organizations,
Offshore Patrol Vessels and Fast Gun Boats of the Sri Lanka Navy being utilized at present for the
SAR missions is subject to operational availability and deployment. Also Sri Lanka has to meet her
international treaty obligations within the assigned SAR regions. Once an emergency/ distress callis received by SLN or informed of such by the Maritime Rescue Coordinating Center, units that
could be released from deployment are dispatched to render assistance. However, extending
assistance in such situations depends upon the capabilities and the endurance of sea units. For
rescue services within closer ranges and needing immediate attention, Fast Attack Craft of the SLN
are utilized. Further the assistance of SLAF could also be obtained if such units are available;
especially in sea areas close ashore.

Objectives:-

To reduce the hazardous situation arising from Oil Pollution and to prevent such taking
disastrous proportions in future as well as to mitigate the consequences of a major spill-

To reduce the effects of floods arising from both man made and natural reasons and toprevent human and material damages-

To sustain a viable SAR operation / assistance to the needy within the allocated region.

Time frame of implementation:
2006 – 2015 short / medium and long term.

Geographical area of implementation:
Oil Spill Prevention and SAR at Sea: Stage I – Territorial waters, Contiguous zone, Stage II – EEZ
Flood Response: Ratnapura, Kalutara, Galle, Matara, Polonnaruwa, Hambantota,Ampara districts

Activities:
Oil Spill Prevention: Stage I (2006-2010)
Assessment/ survey and types of pollution and the area
Purchase of 04 patrol boats
Purchase of 02Adsorbent rolls RP 18
155

R o a d

-

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Purchase of 02 oil spill response units
Purchase of 02 Skimmers each (Folex TDS 200 and Folex TDS 250)
Purchase of 02 inflatable oil booms

Oil Spill Prevention: Stage II (2011-2015)-

Purchase of 02 oil spill vessels
Purchase of 01 search & rescue vessel
Purchase of 04 response vessels

Floods Response:-

Purchase of 20 x Rubber Floatable Dinghies, and 20 outboard motors

SAR at Sea: Stage I (2006-2010)-

Purchase of 04 Response boats
Purchase of 01 SAR vessel

SAR at Sea: Stage II(2011-2015)-

Purchase of 01 additional SAR vessel
Purchase 0f 02 additional response boats

Out put:-

To formulate preventive methods as well as responses, mitigatory capability in the areas ofinterest in a phased out manner
Enhanced floods response capabilities of the SL Navy
Enhancement of SAR capabilities in the region.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006 – 2007)
Year 3-5 (2008 – 2010)
Year 6-10(2011 – 2015)- SLR 1560 million (USD 15.6 million)- SLR 2750 million (USD 27.5 million)- SLR 4500 million (USD 45.0 million)

Total budget- SLR 8810 million (USD 88.1 million)

Funding status
International / Local Funds

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, DMC, Director Naval Operations – SLN, SLN representative to MPPA,
Chairman – MPPA, Director Operations – SLPA, Provincial Councils, Local Authorities; Sri
Lanka Coast Guard (SLCG), Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA), Director General – Department of
Fisheries &Aquatic Resources156

R o a d

PR-17

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aProvision of Aircraft for Disaster Management
Operations and Activities

Agencies involved:
Sri LankaAir Force (SLAF), DMC

Background and rationale:
It is the very nature of natural and man-made disasters, accidents and incidents that they strike withlittle or no warning. Often the disaster itself creates a situation, which makes its management
difficult or sometimes near impossible except by experts who have been especially trained for andequipped. In this context, it has been repeatedly proven around the world that it is the personnel ofthe defence forces who are best geared, physically, psychologically and materially to handle
emergency situations of any nature. In a more specialized sense, the Air Force can play asignificant role in any national disaster management effort since it alone has the potential of being
able to reach almost any location, even in conditions where the disaster has rendered normal
approach routes non-usable, for example a flood situation or landslide. This freedom of movement
enables the Air Force to carry out Search And Rescue (SAR) missions, convey rescue personnel,
aid workers; supplies etc into affected areas and evacuate affected people much faster.
Even though, at present, the SLAF is not sufficiently equipped to handle disasters of large
magnitudes without impeding its operational efficiency, with the existing fleet of aircraft andequipment. In this context, the SLAF is compelled to seek assistance from external sources as donein the past during major floods in 2003 and Tsunami relief work in 2004/2005. Therefore, if it isnecessary to enhance similar capabilities of the SLAF to a degree where the organization would bein a position to handle such situations on its own, and therefore it would be essential to procure
additional helicopters and equipment in sufficient numbers. However, the budgetary allocations
made annually to the SLAF would be grossly insufficient to meet such demands. Hence, if the
Ministry of Disaster Management could provide these aircraft and equipment, the SLAF could
absorb them into its inventory and maintain the same in order to use whenever a requirement arises.
This will be a dedicated user operation.

Objective:
To establish sound search and rescue units in the SLAF to undertake any kind of disaster relief
measures.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 2 (2006-2008) - Short and Medium term
157

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country (Aircraft and main rescue equipment can be based with the Air Force, whileother equipments could be placed with the Colombo Fire Services)

Activities:a.

Short-term procurement: Helicopters, Main Rescue Equipment, Medical Equipment,
Personnel Rescue Gear, Communication Equipment (Detailed Information can beprovided)b. Medium-term procurement: Helicopters, Main Rescue Equipment, Personnel Rescue Gear,
Communication Equipment (Detailed Information can be provided)

Output:Helicopters will be placed along with the SLAF helicopters, and furthermore, same helicopters
could be utilised for commercial purposes on charter flights during normalcy to generate an income
to the government, thus ensuring optimum usage of these assets.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 2600 million (USD 26.0 mi)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 1200 million (USD 12.0 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 3800 million (USD 38.0 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC, Commander of Sri LankaAir Force

158

Chapter 6
Mitigation and Integration of DRR into
Development Planning

6.1

Key Issues

The aim of a mitigation strategy is to reduce losses in the event of potential hazard occurrences. The
primary aim is to reduce the risk of death and injury to the population. Secondary aims include
reducing damage and economic losses to public sector infrastructure and reducing private sector
losses in as far as they are likely to affect the community as a whole. The objectives are likely toinclude encouraging people to protect themselves as far as possible.
Any mitigation strategy is likely to include a range of measures. A set of actions that includes someengineering measures, some spatial planning, and a degree of economic, management and societal
inputs will be needed to bring about effective mitigation. A mitigation programme that concentrates
solely on any one of these five aspects will be unbalanced and is unlikely to achieve its aims.
Disaster mitigation investment has to be seen in terms of the price of protecting existing and future
infrastructure. Spending a bit more on a new facility to build it a little stronger and protect it against
a future threat is usually seen as prudent. The level of investment that is justified to protect society,its economic activities and its built environment is a matter of political decision making, and theeconomics of risk. Decision making on appropriate levels of investment in disaster mitigation
depends on the likelihood of occurrence of the hazard, and assessing the impact if it does occur. The
costs and benefits of alternative investment strategies need to be carefully evaluated. A systematic
framework of risk assessment to establish which hazards are most likely to occur and their probableeffects, will help define the priorities of mitigation programmes.

6.2

Strategy

In order to mitigate disasters and integrate DRR into development plans, identified activities are
categorized into five main areas after consultations:159

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a- Organisational and legal interventions- Demonstration projects- Physical interventions through projects and programmes- Research and development- Awareness and training programmes
Activities proposed under the area of organisational and legal interventions are: the establishmentof DRM committees; the development, regular review and update of DRM plans; and thedevelopment and review of guidelines, bylaws, regulations, procedures etc. to include DRM(mitigation) aspects.
There is a need to review the by-laws and approval procedures of local governments to reduce
inappropriate construction and land use practices in hazard prone areas. Physical interventions
through projects would include the implementation of Coastal Management Plan in 15 identified
locations in coastal areas to minimise coastal erosion; implementation of dam safety programmes
to mitigate floods and minimise damages in the downstream of dams; construction of upstream
reservoirs across three major rivers, Kalu Ganga, Kelani Ganga and Nilwala Ganga; and theintroduction of drought tolerant agricultural methods including micro irrigation facilities, seeds etc
in drought prone areas.
Landslides often take place in mountainous regions, and in urban areas in particular, due to wrong
practices, unavailability of retaining structures, cutting and filling operations etc. The
demonstration projects can be implemented to showcase appropriate practices and also to train
artisans and technicians in relevant construction techniques. In order to achieve the above, there is aneed to undertake research activities through universities and other institutes to arrive at the mostsuitable methods of stabilising landslide prone areas and genetic engineering research to develop
drought resistant seeds. Training and awareness programmes will also be conducted to achieve theoutlined objectives.
In view of the above strategy, the projects prioritised for the next 10 years under this component
entail:Review and revise the building approval procedures adopted by local government
agencies to reduce the impact of natural disaster events.
Integrate disaster risk mitigation into development processes through disaster mitigationplans, and specific allocation for mitigation in all development budgets.
Mitigate impact of drought and reduce drought risk through improved seed materials andintroduction of micro-irrigation.
Mitigate impact of landslides and reduce risk through improvements andrecommendations for structural mitigation.
160

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Protect against and control floods through improvements and new protection systems.
- Reduce disaster risk in all physical planning processes by integrating DRR in decision
making on national land use and physical planning policies.
Protect against storm surges/ sea/ coastal flooding through green belt and incorporationof disaster risk considerations in coastal zone management.
Increase disaster resilience in housing and other critical infrastructure through revisions
in building codes and bylaws
Reduce dam-related hazard risks through appropriate dam safety regulations.
The following projects will be prioritised in the short to medium term:
Minimise Loss of Life and Property Damage due to Floods
This project will be executed in major cities and villages in the downstream of Kalu Ganga in orderto adequately protect Ratnapura and Kalutara districts from floods.
Mitigate and Stabilise Slopes in High Risk Landslide and Rockfall Sites
The objective is to stabilise rockfall and landslide sites from Haldumulla to Haputale andKahagolla to Haputale respectively.

6.3

Project Proposals

The following projects will be prioritised in the short to medium term for Mitigation andIntegration of DRR into Development Planning:
M-1
M-2
M-3
M-4

M-5
M-6

M-7
M-8

Mitigation and Stabilisation of Slopes in High Risk Landslide and Rock Fall Sites
Flood Protection of Major Cities in Kalu Ganga Basin
Disaster MitigationAction Plans
Integrating DIAintoAll Development Plans
M-4.1 Integrate Disaster ImpactAssessment (DIA) into Development Projects
M-4.2 Structural Provisions for Mainstreaming DRM as a Component ofDevelopment
National Land Use & Physical Planning Policy
Coastal Zone Management
M-6.1 Integration of Disaster Risk Considerations in Coastal Zone
Management (CZM) Plan
M-6.2 Natural Barrier along the Coast
Development Controls, Building Bye-laws
Housing, Education, Tourism, Infrastructure Facilities
M-8.1 Mitigation Measures in Housing Schemes, Industrial Estates, Tourist
Hotels161

R o a d

M a p

M-9
M-10
M-11
M-12
M-13
M-14
M-15
M-16

162

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

M-8.2 Reducing Disaster Risk Vulnerability of High Voltage Towers,
Communication Towers
M-8.3 Planning and Construction of Schools and Hospitals in hazard prone
areas to higher standards of hazard resilience
M-8.4 Reducing Disaster Risk Vulnerability around Gas, Fuel and Chemical
Storage Facilities
M-8.5 Providing Safer Critical Infrastructure in Hazard ProneAreas
Drought Mitigation in Select Districts
Enhancing Dam Safety
Risk Transfer Mechanisms
Research and Development in Disaster Risk Reduction
Reducing Health Risk due to Polluted Ground Water
Construction of By-pass Road Down-stream of Kantale Dam
Drinking Water for DroughtAffected Divisions of Hambantota District
and other districts through Desalinisation
Provision of Incinerators as a Solution to Solid Waste Disposal Problem

R o a d

M-1

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Mitigation and Stabilisation of Slopes inHigh Risk Landslide and Rock Fall Sites

Agencies involved:
NBRO, Divisional Secretariat (DS), PC, LA, Road DevelopmentAuthority (RDA), DMC

Background and rationale:
Landslides and rock falls are experienced frequently in Haputale area especially near Haldumulla
and Kahagolla. Certain mitigation activities were implemented at Haldumulla to divert wateraway from landslide sites. However more rock fall site and landslide sites were identified
subsequently. These areas need to be stabilised urgently to make the main highway from Colombo
to Badulla safer for traffic. In addition, several other sites in the 10 landslide-prone districts have tobe identified and mitigation undertaken.

Objectives:
To stabilise rockfall, landslide sites from Haldumulla to Haputale and Kahagolla to Haputale
respectively; to mitigate and stabilise slopes in other high & moderate landslide areas.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 5 (2006- 2010) - Short and Medium-term

Geographical area of implementation:
Haputale area in Uva Province; landslide prone areas of Badulla, Nuwara Eliya, Ratnapura,
Kegalle, Kandy, Matale, Kalutara, Galle, Matara and Hambantota districts.

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Identification of landslide prone sites for mitigation
Risk assessment in rock fall site at Haldumulla and landslide site at Kahagolla
Identification of design slope stabilisation structures and methods
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Construction of mitigation structures and implementation of methods

Outputs:
Road safety improved by preventing rockfalls and minimize landslides at Haputale area
Areas (slopes) categorized as moderate and high risk zones (landslides, slope failures, rockfall) stabilized163

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 44 mi llion(USD 0.44 mi)Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 300 million (USD 3.0 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 344 million (USD 3.44 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Head, Landslide and Service Division NBRO
Director General, Disaster Management Centre164

R o a d

M-2

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Flood Protection of Major Cities in Kalu Ganga Basin

Agencies involved:
Irrigation Department, CEB, Department of Lands, DS

Background and rationale:
Kalu Ganga is the second largest river in Sri Lanka. It drains 2600 square kilometres
entirely in the wet zone of the country. Some areas in the upper Kalu Ganga basin receive
annual rainfall in excess of 5000 mm. These storms often result in floods in the basincausing damages to property and life. Several studies have been conducted in the past to
develop water resources paying special attention to flood control. Preliminary studies havebeen conducted and flood control schemes have been found to be economically feasible as
the damages from the floods are on the increase with development of the river basin and theannual relief provided by the government has increased substantially.
The proposal is to implement a flood protection scheme with the proposed Malawaa Reservoir/
dam is to be constructed at Gilmale village, 6 km upstream of Ratnapura town.

Objectives:
To mitigate flood damages and loss of lives in down stream Kalu Ganga by implementing a flood
control schemeTime frame of implementation:
Year 3-10 (2008- 2015) - Medium and Long term

Geographical area of implementation:
Ratnapura district

Activities:
Year 1-3 (2008-2010)
Design and documentation of mitigation structures in Kalu Ganga; study to identify options to
mitigate floods in rivers
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)
Construction of mitigation structures in Kalu Ganga
165

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Output:Flood-protection structures: creation of a reservoir to store flood water, production of energy 111
Gwh annually. Number of families benefited will be 5000.

Budget:Year 1-3 (2008-2010)
Year 4-8 (2011-2014)- SLR 550 million(USD 5.5 mi)- SLR 8040 million (USD 80.4 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 8590 million (USD 85.9 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director (PD &SS),
Irrigation Department.
Director General, Disaster Management Centre

166

R o a d

M-3

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aDisaster Mitigation Action Plans

Agencies involved:
DMC, District/ Divisional Secretaries, PCs and LAs
Material Development & Training Unit (MDTU) with DMC
Sri Lanka Institute of Local Governance (SLILG),
Provincial Council Local Government (PCLG), UDA, DMC, selected LAs
National Physical Planning Department (NPPD)
PCs, LAs, with DMC
DS, Urban DevelopmentAuthority (UDA), NPPD, SLLRDC,
Landuse Planning Division,Water Resources Board (WRB), ID, LA
DRM Committee- (Activities a, b)- (Activity c);- (Activity d);- (Activity e);- (Activity f);- (Activity g);- (Activity h)

Background and rationale:
Till date, government and NGOs have reacted to disasters by providing relief to affected populations
without adopting a proactive approach and implementing mitigation measures. Disasters wereconsidered to be natural phenomena and low priority was given in releasing funds for mitigation work.
Enforcement of existing regulations, which could minimise the effect of disasters to some extent, wasweak. Officers at provincial and local levels were poorly informed of the nature of disasters effecting
the area and actions to be taken to minimise the effect. DRR activities were not included in provincial
and local development plans. These measures were not regularly reviewed/ monitored by competentgroups at Provincial /Local levels.
This necessitates the development of Disaster Mitigation action Plans at all levels ofgovernment (Provincial Councils, Local Authorities and all public sector Institutions, forsystematic mitigatory actions to be taken. These should be regularly updated andimplemented.

Objectives:
Integrating disaster risk mitigation actions into development plans, ensuring fund for
implementation of mitigations activities in development projects and developing, monitoring andregularly updating disaster management plans.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 5 (2006- 2010) - Short and Medium term

167

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
Phase 1
Phase II
Phase IIIAll coastal districts
Central hills, Uva and Sabaragamuwa Provinces
All other Provinces

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Establishment of DRM committees at all levels
b. Develop a methodology to prepare DRM plansc. Conduct awareness programme for Heads other relevant officers of Institutions &organizations
d. Develop and Review regulations, byelaws and approval procedure relating to all
development projects and introduce appropriate disaster reduction measurese. Integrate mitigation budget line item in annual budget of all governments (initially
preferably to have 5% of the annual budget allocated for mitigation interventions)Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
f. Develop & implement DRM (mitigation) plans considering multi -hazard environmentg. Develop guidelines to Integrate risk management options in land use plansh. DRM plans reviewed and revised with feedbacks once a year

Output:
DRM Programmes/Plans and Projects developed and implemented to mitigate the disaster in LAs
and PC areas

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)- SLR 3.9 million(USD 0.039 mi)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 1.5 million (USD 0.015 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 5.4 million (USD 0.054 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Chief Secretaries-Provincial Councils- Management Development Training Unit (MDTU)
168

R o a d

M-4.1

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Integration of Disaster Impact Assessment (DIA)
into Development Projects

Agencies involved:
DMC, CEA, NBRO, UDA, ProjectApprovingAgencies
UDA, CEA, DMC, NBRO, ITI, Universities, project approving agencies
Centre for Housing Planning Building (CHPB), MDTU, SLILG,SLIDA, DMC, CEAPC, DS
NBRO, ID, Survey Dept

- (Activity a)- (Activity b,c)-(Activity d,f)-(Activity e);-(Activity g);

Background and rationale:
At present, impact of a project on the environment is considered through a well-established
Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) process. However the impact of the same project on lifeand properties is not assessed properly and mitigation measures are not identified. Conducting
disaster impact assessment (DIA) should be made mandatory for specified development projects asin the case of EIA. In order to minimise delays in the approval process, criteria for undertaking DIA
could be included in the EIAprocess.

Objectives:
To assess disaster risk of specified projects at the formulation stages so as to minimise possibility ofincreased disaster risk after implementation of development projectTime frame of implementation:
Year 1- 5 (2006-2010) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Prepare guidelines to categorise development projects that need to undertake DIA
b. Development of guidelines for integrating disaster risk impact assessment into planning &approval process of all Development projects
c. Establish procedures for projectapprovalfollowing DIAand incorporating reduction measures.
d. Capacity building of the personnel involved in project formulation, assessment and approval.
169

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k ae. Implement DIAin the EIAprocess for selected projects with effect from July 2006
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
f. Capacity building of the personnel involved in project formulation, assessment andapproval.
g. Demarcate and publish in the gazette hazard prone areas, reservations, boundaries of rivers,
land with steep slopes and landslide effected areas

Output:i. Procedure in place for integrating DIAinto approval process of specified projects
ii. Guidelines developed to categorise projects needing DIAiii. Hazard prone areas, reservations, boundaries of rivers, and land with steep slopes andlandslide affected areas identified as special areas and published in the gazetteiv. Atotal of 1250 persons trained in the DIAintegration process.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)- SLR 29.0 million(USD 0.29 mi)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 0.80 million (USD 0.008 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 29.80 million (USD 0.298 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre170

R o a d

M-4.2

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Structural Provisions for Mainstreaming DRM asa Component of Development

Agencies Involved:
NPPD, DMC

Background and rationale:
With the Disaster Impact Assessment (DIA) included in the EIA process towards minimising delaysin the approval process, it is necessary to ensure that structural provisions are established formainstreaming risk management as a component of development.

Objectives:
To establish structural provisions for mainstreaming risk management as a component of development

Time frame of implementation:
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities:
i. Discussions with the Department of National Planning and plan implementation.
ii. Provide necessary information (such as Road map for disaster management and mile stones
to be achieved under the National DRM plan (S)Outputs:
DRR sector/cluster is established in the national and regional development plans

Budget:Funding not required

Funding status :Funding not required

Contact in lead and participating agencies
Disaster Management Centre - Director General
Department of National Planning and Plan Implementation under Ministry of Finance171R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

M-5

i n

S r i L a n k a

National Land Use and Physical Planning Policy

Agencies involved:
DMC, NPPD, Land Use Planning Division, UDA
UDA, NPPD, DMC, University, PC, LA
SLILG, CHPB, MDTU, UDA, NPPD, LA
MDTU, UDA, NPPD, SLLRDC, NPPD, UDA, LA, DMC, ID, PC, DS
UDA, NBRO, ID, LA, PC, NPPD

- (Activity a)- (Activity b)- (Activity c)- (Activity d)- (Activity e)

Background and rationale:
Land Use Planning Division of DS is responsible for the formulation of land use policy of thearea under its jurisdiction, UDA has to prepare urban development plans for urban centres
declared under the UDA act. In all the other areas physical development plans are prepared by
NPPD. UDA with the assistance of Sri Lanka Urban Multi-hazard Disaster Management Project
developed guidelines to incorporate DRM in the preparation of Urban Development Plans. Thiswas implemented at one of the municipal councils on pilot basis. Development of urban plans
for many LA are in drafting stages, therefore DM concerns could be incorporated before
publishing in the gazette. Capacity of Planning Officers in Divisional Secretariats also has to be
improved to incorporate DM in the development of land use policy.

Objective:
To minimise loss of lives and damages to property by incorporating disaster risk
considerations in national land use policy and in physical development planning process.
Integrate disaster risk considerations into national land use policy and physicalplanning policy

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 5 (2006-2010) Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country and as priority in 7 selected districts prone to landslides and floods

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Discussions with the departments of National Physical Planning and Land use Planningunder Ministry of Policy Planning,172

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k ab. Development of physical planning policy and guidelines to integrate DRM into
preparation of structure plans, urban land use plans etc.
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)c. Train Planning Officers and other relevant personnel to integrate DRM in to preparationof structure plans, urban land use plans etc.
d. Develop a structure plan incorporating DRR as a pilot project in 7 districts prone to natural
disasters.
e. Develop 20 Urban plans incorporating DRR as a pilot project in 7 districts prone tolandslides and floods.

Output:1. Concept of DRM is incorporated into land use policy.
2. Guidelines to incorporate disaster risk mitigation activities in Physical Development
planning process in place
3. Structure plans in 7 districts and urban development plans in 20 local authorities completed
4. 350 officers trained

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)- SLR 4 million (USD 0.04 mi)- SLR 15 million (USD 0.15 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 19 million (USD 0.19 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Director General - National Physical Planning Department

173

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

M-6.1

i n

S r i L a n k a

Integration of Disaster Risk Considerations in
Coastal Zone Management (CZM) plan

Agencies involved:
Coast Conservation Department (CCD), DMC
CCD, Dept. of Fisheries andAquatic Resources, PCs , LAs
CCD, Ministry of Fisheries, NARA, LAs, PCs- (Activity a);- (Activity b)- (Activity c);

Background and rationale:
The CZM Plan was prepared in 2004 and it has been revised after the Tsunami. The December 2004
tsunami has reiterated the need to integrate disaster risk considerations in CZM policy and indecision making.

Objectives:
To implement Priority Risk Management Projects under CZM plan 2004 withconsiderations on reduction of impact of coastal hazards in 15 locations

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 5 (2006-2010) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Coastal Belt

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Discussions with the CCD and other stakeholder organizations such as NARA, fisheries
department etc
b. Development of CZM policy with considerations on reduction of impact of coastal hazards
through a consultative process with other stakeholders
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
c. Implementation of identified Disaster Management activities in Coastal Zone
management Plan174

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Output:Disaster risk considerations integrated in CZM Policy and in decision making
Priority Risk Management Projects under CZM plan 2004 with considerations on
reduction of impact of coastal hazards implemented
CZM plans implemented in 15 locations

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)- SLR 10 million (USD 0.1 mi)Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 300 million (USD 3.0 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 310 million (USD 3.1mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director- CCD; Director General- DMC

175

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

M-6.2

i n

S r i L a n k a

Natural Barrier along the Coast

Agencies involved:
Ministry of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (M/FAR), CCD, DMC
CCD, PC, LA, NGOs, Police
CCD, PIU, CBOs, LA
CCD, Agricultural Dept., Forest Dept, CBOs
CCD, PIU, DS
CBOs, NGOs, PS
CCD- (Activities a,j);- (Activity b)- (Activity c);- (Activity d);- (Activity e);- (Activities f,h);- (Activities g,i)

Background and rationale:
Coastal areas are very dynamic and complex environments, subject to continuously changing
biophysical conditions. As a result of these changing conditions coastal areas are subject to naturalforces which cause maximum damages to socio-economic and ecological properties.
The impact of coastal erosion is most severe along the Western and Southern coast of Sri Lanka.
Establishment of vegetation belt as a soft solution has been tested in several places and has proved
to be an effective mitigation action against sea erosion, and the destruction caused by tsunamis, aswell as improving the scenic beauty of the coast.

Objectives:
To increase the protection of the shoreline against coastal erosion, protection of human lives andproperties against natural hazards such as tsunami and to preserve the scenic beauty of coastal
environment.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 5 (2006-2010) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
Selected coastal area in the Southern and Western coasts

176

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Setting up of a project steering committee and a technical committeeb. Create awareness among relevant stakeholders including government agencies, NGOs andcommunities
c. Identify worst affected sites suitable for establishment of a green belt
d. Selection of suitable plant material, establishment and maintenance of plant nurseries
e. Identify partner organisations and implementation mechanism
f. Implementation of planting programme and maintenanceg. Training of staff on new methods and experience sharing
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)h. Implementation of planting programme and maintenancei. Training of staff on new methods and experience sharing
j. Monitoring and supervision

Output:Coastline protected and trees are planted in an area of 1000 ha of affected coast

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget- SLR 40 million (USD 0.4 mi)- SLR 60 million (USD 0.6 mi)- SLR 100 million (USD 1.0mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Secretary - Ministry of Fisheries andAquatic Resources
Director- Coast Conservation Department
Director General- Disaster Management Centre177

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

M-7

i n

S r i L a n k a

Development Controls, Building Bye-laws

Agencies involved:
DMC, UDA, NHDA, CHPB, Universities, NBRO, IESL, IASL, CECB, GSMB, Building Department(Activity a); Expert Group- (Activity b); Ministry of Provincial Councils, PC, LA, SLILG, PCLG,
DMC-(Activity c); MDTU, SLILG, DMC- (Activity d); PC,SLILG,DMC-(Activity e)

Background and rationale:
Any individual or organisation proposing to construct houses or undertake development activity
within the urban area declared under UDA act is required to submit a building application certified
by a qualified person and obtain approval of LA before commencing construction work. The
building application covers merely the planning and health aspects and not the structural safety ofthe building. Design inputs for the safety of buildings are not obtained at any stage of construction.
Outside UDA declared areas no approval is required. LAs have the power to remove any building
adjoining a street if it is a threat to public safety.
Areas prone to disaster should be categorized and marked in plans, and people should be madeaware of the danger in constructing houses in these areas. Simple guide lines for constructionof houses in areas affected by tsunami, landslides, floods, cyclones and lighting strikes weredeveloped by various institutions. These guidelines haves to be reviewed/developed to cover
all disasters and made available to public to minimize the impact of a disaster to buildings.

Objective:
To increase disaster resilience through safer housing construction in hazard prone areas

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 5 (2006-2010) Short and Medium-term

Geographical area of implementation:
Stage I. LAs declared under UDAact and prone to disaster
Stage II. LAs in coastal areas of Western, Southern, Eastern and Northern Provinces.
Stage III. In other LAs prone to disasters178

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Formation of an expert groupb. Develop or introduce revisions to building codes/guidelines for construction in hazard
prone areasc. Study the existing bye-laws in LG sector and introduce revisions for construction in hazard
prone areas and strategies for effective enforcement.
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
d. Train Technical Officers in LAs on the use of technical guidelines
e. Undertake public awareness programmes through newspaper advertisements, Radio and
TV interviews

Output:Building codes/guidelines to increase hazard resilience; Revised by-laws in LG Sector and PCs toincrease hazard resilience and enforcement capability

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget- SLR 1.5 million (USD 0.015 mi)- SLR 1.5 million (USD 0.015mi)- SLR 3.0 million (USD 0.030 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Chairman - Urban DevelopmentAuthority
Director - Sri Lanka Institute of Local Government
Director General- Disaster Management Centre179

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

M-8

M-8.1

i n

S r i L a n k a

Housing, Education, Tourism, Infrastructure Facilities

Mitigation Measures in Housing Schemes, Industrial Estates,
Tourist Hotels

Agencies Involved
DMC, Ministry of Disaster Management & Human Rights, Ministry of Housing &Construction, NHDA, UDA, Ministry of Industries, Tourist Board, Banks, NPPD, Board of
Investment (BOI), IDB, CHPB, IESL, SLIA

Background and rationale
It was observed that reinforced concrete structures of most buildings have survived the devastatingtsunami waves on 26.12.2004 but not the partition walls. In the absence of a Sri Lankan Codes ofPractice, all structures are designed following British Code of Practice and in some cases,
Australian or Indian codes. Design guidelines/criteria specified for different hazard and intensities
may need to be given to designers.
Further, all critical infrastructures must be designed to a given level of safety fromdisaster impact. While some such guidelines are already available, areas not covered
under them are being reviewed presently and action taken. Shortly, DMC will take steps
through UDA to include these in UDA Regulations and the NPPD regional structure plans.
Such information must be provided to designers and an adequate monitoring system be inplace.

Objectives:
To reduce disaster vulnerability by adopting mitigation measures in planning and construction of
government housing schemes, industrial estates, and tourist hotel.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-5 (2006-2010) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
National level180R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
i. Implementation of guidelines and codes for hazard resistant construction for government
housing scheme, industrial estates, tourist hotels etc.
ii. Develop and introduce incentive programme for private housingiii. Technical and financial support to construct housing schemes, industrial estates, tourist
hotels etc. to higher standard of hazard resilience
iv. Conduct training programme for Engineers, Planners & Technical Officers on the use ofplanning and building guidelines

Outputs:
Programme for planning and construction of housing schemes, industrial estates, tourist hotels, bystate and private sector in hazard prone areas to higher standard of hazard resilience

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)- SLR 160 million (USD 1.6 mi)- SLR 100 million (USD 1.0 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 260 million (USD 2.6 mi)

Funding status :Local & International Funding Required

Contact in lead and participating agencies
Ministry of Disaster Management & Human Rights- Secretary
Disaster Management Centre - Director General

Other ParticipatingAgencies:
Ministry of Housing & Construction, NHDA, UDA, Ministry of Industries, Tourist Board, Banks,
NPPD, Board of Investment (BOI), IDB, CHPB, IESL, SLIA181

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

M-8.2

i n

S r i L a n k a

Reducing Disaster Risk Vulnerability ofHigh Voltage Towers, Communication Towers

Agencies involved:
DMC, Ministry of Disaster Management & Human Rights, Telecom Regulatory
Commission (TRC), Ministry of Power & Energy, Ministry of Information, UDA, CEB, LAs,
TelecommunicationAgencies, NPPD

Background and rationale:
All critical infrastructures must be designed to a given level of safety from disaster
impact. Such guidelines must be provided to designers and adequate monitoring system bein place.

Objectives:
To reduce disaster risk vulnerability by adopting mitigation measures in planning and constructionof high voltage towers, communication towers etc.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
National level

Activities:
a. Development of planning and construction guide lines, for the construction of hazard
resistant High Voltage towers, communication towers in hazard prone areasb. Conduct training programme for Engineers, Planners & Technical Officers on the use ofplanning and construction guide lines
c. Conduct awareness programmes for people including school children residing close highvoltage towers, communication towers

Outputs:
Guidelines for planning and construction of high voltage towers, communication towers aredeveloped and used
182

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)- SLR 3.5 million (USD 0.035 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 3.5 million (USD 0.035 mi)

Funding status :Local & International Funding Required

Contact in lead and participating agencies
M/DM &HR Secretary; DMC - Director General;

Other participating agencies:
Ministry of Information-Secretary; Ministry of Power & Energy- Secretary; CEB- Chairman
TelecommunicationsAgencies - Chief Executive Officers; TRC- Chairman

183

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

M-8.3

i n

S r i L a n k a

Planning and Construction of Schools and Hospitals
in Hazard Prone Areas to Higher Standards Of
Hazard Resilience

Agencies involved:
DMC, Ministry of Disaster Management; Ministry of Education, National and Provincial Healthministries, Dept. of Buildings, IESL, UDA, School Works Division, PCs, CHPB, Universities,
Ministry of Housing & Construction

Background and rationale:
It was observed that reinforced concrete structures of most buildings have survived the devastatingtsunami waves on 26.12.2004 but not the partition walls. In the absence of a Sri Lankan Codes ofPractice all structures are designed following British Code of Practice and in some specificinstances Australian or Indian codes. Design guidelines/criteria specified for different hazard andintensities may need to be given to designers.
Type plans for school buildings and hospitals will have to be reviewed/ redesigned to a highstandard of safety. All public buildings constructed in hazard prone areas should be designed as
evacuation centres, therefore should withstand certain intensity of hazard. Review has toundertaken by an Expert group representing Professional bodies, academics, practitioners, public
and private sector originations engaged in design and construction of infrastructure.

Objectives:
To construct hospitals and schools in hazard prone areas to higher standard of hazard resilience.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
National level

Activities:
a.
b.
c.
d.
184

Implementation of guidelines and codes for hazard resistant construction for schools
and hospitals
Identify all new school and hospitals to be constructed in hazard prone areas
Review standard plans & design for adequacy of construction. of school building andhospitals. Issue amended designs to relevant department and agencies.
Conduct training programme for Engineers, Planners & Technical Officers on the useof Planning and building guidelines

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Outputs:
Programme to construct school and hospital in hazard prone areas to higher standard ofresilience

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Total Budget- SLR 1.4 million (USD 0.014 mi)- SLR 1.4 million (USD 0.014 mi)

Funding status:
Local & International Funding Required

Contact in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR- Secretary, DMC- Director General,
Ministry of Education- Secretary,
National and Provincial Ministries of Health - Secretary,
Ministry of Housing and Construction Secretary,
UDA- Chairman,
Provincial Council - Chief Secretary185

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

M-8.4

i n

S r i L a n k a

Reducing Disaster Risk Vulnerability around Gas,
Fuel and Chemical Storage Facilities

Agencies involved:
Ministry of Disaster Management & Human Rights, DMC; CPC, Shell Gas, Laugfs Gas, IOC
Lanka, Ministry of Power & Energy, CEA, UDA

Background and rationale:
With the present rapid development it has become essential to review criteria used toassess the disaster risks around fuel, gas and chemical storage facilities, high voltage
transmission towers, communication towers etc. with a view to reduce the risk
vulnerability of communities around these installations. Equally important is toundertake disaster risk assessment and conduct awareness programme for residents close
to these facilities.

Objectives:
To reduce the disaster risks, vulnerability around fuel, gas and chemical storage facilities.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
National level

Activities:
a. Formation of an Expert to cover different types of facilities
b. Review safety precautions taken around fuel, gas storage facilities and precautionary
measures adopted. Identify vulnerable areas near facilities.
c. Conduct awareness programmes for people including school children residing close highvoltage towers, communication towers, fuel, gas and chemical storage facilities to makethem aware of risk and precaution to be taken

Outputs:
List of sites vulnerable to gas, fuel & chemical disasters are identified and listed. People are madeaware of risks.
186

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 1.7 million (USD 0.017 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 1.7 million (USD 0.017 mi)

Funding status:
Local & International Funding Required

Contact in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR- Secretary, DMC- Director General,
Ministry of Power & Energy - Secretary
CPC, Shell Gas, Laugfs Gas, IOC Lanka,
Ministry of Power & Energy, CEA, UDA

187

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

M-8.5

i n

S r i L a n k aProviding Safer Critical Infrastructure in
Hazard Prone Areas

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, DMC, Government sector institutions responsible for critical infrastructuredevelopment projects, IESL and professional bodies, PCs

Background and rationale:
In the past, disaster events have affected infrastructure facilities to varying extent. This
results in people's suffering for lack of basic facilities and the responsible agencies too haveto struggle to get the facilities back to normal functioning conditions. This points to the factthat all critical infrastructure facilities must be designed to a given level of safety fromdisaster impact. Such guidelines must be provided to designers and adequate monitoring
system should be in place.

Objectives:
To increase disaster resilience through provision of safer critical infrastructure in hazard prone
areas

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) -Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
National level

Activities:
a. Formation of an Expert Group to cover different types of infrastructureb. Implementation of guidelines, codes for hazard resistant infrastructure construction
c. Conduct training programme for the infrastructure facility providing agencies and theEngineers, Planners & Technical Officers on the use of guidelines
d. Identify critical infrastructure to be provided in hazard prone arease. Develop guidelines for construction of critical infrastructure in Hazard prone areas
f. Review construction programmes to ensure adoption of hazard mitigation measures in all
infrastructure development activities.
188

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Outputs:
Disaster resilience of critical infrastructure in hazard prone areas ensured through use of planningand construction guidelines

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 30 million (USD 0.3 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 30 million (USD 0.3 mi)

Funding status:
Local & International Funding Required

Contact in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR- Secretary, DMC- Director General,
Ministry of Power & Energy - Secretary,
CEB, ID, NWSDB, RDA, PRDAand
all other government sector institutions responsible for critical infrastructure189

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

M-9

i n

S r i L a n k aDrought Mitigation in Selected Districts

Agencies involved:
Department ofAgriculture (DoA), Universities
Agrarian Research Training Institute (ARTI), DoA, GA, DS
DoA, GA,DS
WRB, Farmer Organisation, DS,Agricultural Extension Office
DoA, GA, DS, National Planning Dept
DoA, Dept. of National Planning, DS, GN, Farmer Organizations
WRB, DMC- (Activity g); DoA, CBO, Farmer Organisations
Agricultural Extension Office, Farmer Organisations, NGO
DS, GA, WRB, LA, NGO
NGO, DS, GA, CBO, SLRCS- (Activity a);- (Activity b);- (Activity c);- (Activity d);- (Activity e);- (Activity f);-(Activity h);- (Activity i);- (Activity j);- (Activity k);

Background and rationale:
Farmers in drought prone areas largely depend on monsoonal rains to cultivate crops. Delayed
sowing and use of low quality seeds lead to crop failures in most cases. Farmers in remote villages
are the worst affected as they are unable to get quality seeds in time.
With the extensive use of artificial manure, organic content of the soil has reduced affecting its
water retention capacity and resulting in rapid loss of water from the soil. When monsoon rains failin consecutive years, water stored in tanks and reservoirs is not sufficient to meet the demand andover exploitation of ground water takes place. Farmers could be provided with technical andfinancial assistance to use various micro irrigation facilities for optimal utilization of the limited
amount of water available. Methods of conserving water also need to be introduced and the farmers
encouraged through financial assistance.
Keeping in mind that the demand for surface water is increasing, it is necessary to undertake
research programmes to develop drought tolerant crops using latest technology such as genetic
engineering. Conflict in water usage for irrigation and domestic purposes could be eased with thepromotion of rain water harvesting and supply of drinking water using bowsers.

Objectives:
To minimize crop failure by introducing and promoting distribution of quality seeds into farmers in drought prone areas, especially in remote villages;
To promote drought tolerant agriculture methods and make ground water assessment
maps available
190

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

To promote soil rehabilitation programmes, and use of micro irrigation facilities indrought prone areas;
To improve the management of drinking water supply

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 10 (2006-2015) - Short, Medium and Long term

Geographical area of implementation:
Anuradapura, Polonnaruwa, Putlum, Kurunegala, Hambantota districts

Activities:
a. To promote research to develop drought tolerant crops and research on genetic
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.

g.
h.
i.
j.
k.

engineering
Train extension officers to transfer the research findings to farmers
Develop a procedure to obtain quality seeds to distribute to farmers in time
Identify potential ground water sources in 500 villages in drought prone districts andpromote ground water for irrigation
Strengthen extension service to assist farmers in remote villages of drought prone districts
and ensure better growth by providing quality seeds on time.
Develop and implement a programme to encourage farmers through an incentive scheme to
produce and apply organic manure to rejuvenate the soil, reduce moisture stress and thereby
reduce the crop loss.
Develop a scheme to provide micro irrigation facilities along with agro-wells and otherappropriate water resources
Formation of user groups to control local water resources/tanks including maintenance ofhand pumps
Promotion of water conservation awarenessAugment water supply through bowsering /dug wells
Promote community/household rainwater harvesting structures for local drinking water
security

Output:-Soil rehabilitation programme in place; Micro irrigation schemes are in use in drought prone
areas; Drought tolerant agricultural methods in use;
Sustenance of minimum level of drinking water supply ensured;
Ground WaterAssessment maps available
191

R o a d

-

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aCapacity of WRB enhanced to forecast hazardous ground regimes
Hazardous ground water areas in NCP identified
People are made aware of the effect of polluted ground water on health and the possible
preventive actions
Water purification kits given to 1000 most affected families

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)- SLR 50 million (USD 0.50 mi)- SLR 300 million (USD 3.0 mi)- SLR 100 million (USD1.0 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 450 million (USD 4.5 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director - Department ofAgriculture,
Chairman- Water Resources Board ,Director-Agrarian Research Training Institute, DMC- Director-General192

R o a d

M-10

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aEnhancing Dam Safety

Agencies involved:
Ministry of Irrigation, Ministry of Power and Energy, MoDM
ID, CEB, MASL
CEB
NBRO, DMC
DS, Police, DMC
PC, LA, GN-(Activity a);- (Activities b,c,d,f,g,h)- (Activity i)- (Activity c)- (Activity g)- (Activity h)

Background and rationale:
Sri Lanka is predominantly an agricultural country with a proud history of building large
irrigation systems including major reservoirs. Apart from a recent instance of a breached sluicegate in one of the major reservoirs (Kanthale), no major incidents have been reported in over a
thousand years. However with the creation of major reservoirs for generating electricity
impounding major rivers in the hilly terrain by high dams, disaster risk in the downstream ofthese reservoirs has increased. Presently three government agencies are responsible for the
maintenance of reservoirs. Although data on some of the reservoirs and dams are available withthese institutions, there is no list of areas that will be affected in case of release of excess water.
Landslides of minor scale have been reported in steep slopes close to reservoirs. Therefore
ensuring the safety of dams as well as the steep slopes of the reservoirs has become vital tomitigate disaster that could be caused due to uncontrolled release of water from reservoirs.

Objective:
To ensure safety of dams through a proactive approach for regular maintenanceTo develop database on main dams, which can create flood vulnerability due to sudden
release of water
To list dams classified according to risk available
To develop procedure for dam inspection and monitoring of reservoir induced
landslides & earth quakes

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 2 ( 2006- 2007) - Short term
Year 3-5 ( 2008- 2010) - Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
All provinces193R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Constitute an expert group for dam inspection and monitoring.
b. Development of database on dams which can create flood due to sudden release of waterc. Develop procedures for dam inspection and monitoring of dams and areas around the reservoir
d. Assess all dams for spillway adequacy and other structural failurese. Undertake periodic dam inspection and monitor mitigation programme and recommend
further safety measures
Year 3-5 (2008 - 2010)f. Prepare inundation maps for downstream areas of all major reservoirs and identify risk areas.
g. Develop and introduce a proper warning mechanism
h. Conduct awareness programmmes for relevant officials, residents and children invulnerable areas
i. Introduce rubber gates instead of the flash boards presently used at Castlereigh reservoir

Output:Database on major dams that can create flood vulnerability due to uncontrolled releaseof water
List of dams classified according to risk available
Procedure for dam inspection and monitoring of reservoir induced landslides andearthquakes

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)- SLR 8.5 million (USD 0.085 mi)- SLR 171 million (USD 1.71 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 179.5 million (USD 1.795 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Disaster Management Centre
Ministry of Irrigation
Ministry of Power and Energy
Irrigation Department
Ceylon Electricity Board
MahaweliAuthority of Sri Lanka
194- Director-General- Secretary- Secretary- Director Irrigation- Chairman- Chairman

R o a d

M-11

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Risk transfer Mechanisms

Agencies involved:
Lending Institutions and Insurance Sector; DMC, SLRCS

Background and rationale:
The government has been spending large sums of money for payment of compensation to victimsof disasters every year. Over the last few years damages to life and property due to natural disasters
have been on the rise. In most occasions infrastructure belonging to the private sector is insured
against fire and civil unrest but not against natural disasters. However individual houses and small
business are not covered by any insurance policy.
International insurers charge high premium for re-insurance, which leads to high premium
for local insurance and therefore people are reluctant to insure properties. Government
should encourage the banking and insurance sector agencies and micro credit facilitators todevelop innovative schemes as effective financial and economic tools to reduce losses anddamages. Special incentive packages and capacity building programmes should beorganized.

Objectives:
To introduce effective economic and financial tools aiming at reduction of losses and damages
through increased participation of private sector in risk management activities.

Time frame of implementation :Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term

Geographical area of implementation
The entire country

Activities
a. Organize seminars for banking sector insurance sector and micro credit
facilitators
b. Establish a resource group for developing schemes suited to government sector institutions
and general public in Sri Lanka
195

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k ac. Facilitate the participation of stakeholders in international networking eventsd. Improve micro-finance and micro-insurance for DM
e. Encourage revision of lending procedures for development activities such as mini-hydroprojects, human settlement development projects etc., to integrate risk management
interventions (e.g: set up limits for loans , making compulsory a report from a competentauthority for granting loans)
f. Make available insurance schemes for development projects in hazard prone areas.

Outputs:
Risk transfer mechanism and safety nets (Insurance/ Incentive schemes) established to reduce
losses.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)- SLR 1.8 million (USD 0.018 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 1.8 million (USD 0.018 mi)

Funding status:
Additional Funding Required

Contact in lead and participating agencies
DMC - Director General; Lending Insurance sector institutions,
State & Private Banks - Chairmen/CEOs196

R o a d

M-12

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Research and Development in Disaster Risk Reduction

Agencies involved:
DMC, Universities, Scientific and Technical Institutions

Background and rationale
The lack of coherent and consistent 'losses' and 'damages' data for immediate recovery planningand lack of information on existing and emerging patterns of disaster risk for longer term
preparedness and mitigation measures had previously been identified as a major constraint facedby policy and decision makers in Sri Lanka. Systematic disaster inventories that capture timeseries, local-level impacts of disaster events can be very useful in discerning trends in emerging
disaster risks and in making policy, programme design and resource allocation decisions to manage
those risks.
Research will help strengthening the data base on disaster information as well as in the disasterrisk assessment studies in prone areas. As proposed in the integration of DRM in university
education, Masters and Bachelor Degree students will be encouraged to select Disaster Risk
Management related themes for dissertations. Important and urgent research studies can be
entrusted to R&D agencies dealing with these subjects; and also relevant departments ofuniversities, either as specific studies to the staff or by providing grants for PhD or Masters
theses with proper supervision by the staff. Publication of research findings also will bepromoted.
For the government, the availability of accurate, comprehensive, time-sensitive data on disasteraffected populations is critical for operational efficiency, planning and transparency. Informationfrom research will help regular updating of the DMC website and the database.

Objectives:
To encourage technical and scientific institutions and universities to undertake Research& Development activities in DRR
To initiate a programme for Research and Development in DRR

Time frame of implementation:
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term

197

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
National level and focusing on districts prone to various disasters

Activities:
a. Identification of needsb. Undertaking priority research and development programs

Outputs:
Technical and scientific institutions and universities encouraged to undertake Researchand Development activities in DRR
Programme initiated to undertake Research and Development in DRR

Budget:Year 3-5 (2008-2010)- SLR 1 million (USD 0.01 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 1 million (USD 0.01 mi)

Funding status:
Additional Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Universities, Scientific and Technical Institutions

198

R o a d

M-13

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Reducing Health Risks due to Polluted Ground Water

Agencies involved:
Water Resources Board (WRB) , Ministry of Health (MoH), PC, LA, GN - (Activities a,b); MoH,
MDTU, PC, LA, WRB (Activity d); MoH, GN, DS, LA, WRB (Activity c);

Background and rationale:
Sri Lanka is a tropical country where water is a major constraint for development. Traditional
practice maintains a fragile balance between water resources and the demand for agriculture anddomestic use. The rapidly developing society and use of modern technology compounded by theclimatic changes is disturbing the historical balance. Limited availability of surface water in the
North-Central, North-Western part of Southern and Northern provinces of Sri Lanka has resulted
in the rapid exploitation of ground water. Use of poor quality ground water has caused serious
health problems like kidney failures and skeletal fluorosis in these parts of the country. The
government has to spend large sums of money to provide medical facilities in these areas to savethe affected people.

Objective:
To reduce the health risk of people in identified villages in North-Central province due to use ofhazardous ground water for drinking.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 ( 2006 2007) - Short term
Year 3-5 (2008 2010) - Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
a. Enhancing the forecasting capability on hazardous aspect of ground water regimes
b. Identification of hazardous ground water areas in North-Central provincec. Conduct awareness programmes on the quality of drinking water and the adverse effects ofdissolved chemicals along with preventive measures199

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aYear 3-5 (2008-2010)
d. Issue water purifications kits to 1000 most affected families

Output:Capacity of WRB enhanced to forecast hazardous ground regimes
Hazardous ground water areas in NCP identified
Water purification kits given to 1000 most affected families
People are made aware of the effect of polluted ground water on health and the possible
preventive actions

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget- SLR 23 million (USD 0.230 mi)- SLR 17.5 million (USD 0.175 mi)- SLR 40.5 million (USD 0.405 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Water Resources Board
Medical Officer of HealthAnuradhapura
North Central Provincial Council
Local authority

200- Chairman- MoHAnuradapura- Chief Secretary- Mayor/Chairman

R o a d

M-14

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aConstruction of By-pass Road Down-stream of'Kantale Dam1

Agencies involved:
Road DevelopmentAuthority, Irrigation Department, Divisional Secretary

Background and rationale:
Kantale dam once breached is identified as a vulnerable dam due to heavy traffic passing over it.
Due to the current weak condition of the dam, Irrigation Department was of the firm view thatheavy traffic over the bund was to be limited to 20 metric tonnes. The heavy trucks that transport
flour from Prima factory and cement from Mitsui Company exceed the allowable load of 20 metrictones, sometimes threefold. Irrigation Department has requested RDA in January 2005 to prohibit
heavy traffic over the dam and limit the weight to the allowable maximum. In spite of a special
gazette notification published accordingly in June 2005, up till now the RDA and the Police could
not implement the limitations given in the gazette notice due to various reasons. One main
impediment is the non-existence of an alternate road.
Inhabitants of down stream of the dam too agitate from time to time, to limit the traffic flow as they
had a bitter experience earlier and are still living with fear.
To impose the weight limitations recommended by the Irrigation Department it is necessary toprovide an alternate road down stream of the bund for which the RDA has already submitted a
proposal with plans and an estimate.

Objective:
To reduce the risk of failure of the Kantale dam by re-routing heavy traffic along
the bundTime frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
Kantale201

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Design, Tender Documents and Tender Procedure, Construction

Output:An alternate road down stream of the Kantale dam constructed to reduce traffic on the road along
the dam.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 40 million (USD 0.4 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 40 million (USD 0.4 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Road DevelopmentAuthority
Chief Engineer
Road DevelopmentAuthority
Inner Harbour Road
Trincomalee
Tel: 026-2221009
Irrigation Department
Director General of Irrigation
011-2584984, id_dgi@solaris.gov.lk
Divisional Secretary (for acquisition of lands if any)202

R o a d

M-15

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Drinking Water for Coastal Divisions of Hambantota
District and other Select Districts by Providing
Desalinisation package plants

Agencies involved:
M / DM&HR, DMC, LAs, NWS&DB

Background and rationale:
Population in drought prone divisions of Hambantota district do not have adequate drinking waterfor consumption and they are supplied with drinking water using bowsers once a week or so. In
several other areas salinity is present in ground water again resulting in shortage of potable water.
The NWS&DB policy in water supply is to provide 200 litres per capita / day in densely populatedareas. In rural drought prone areas and in areas where potable water is scarce, this has been reduced
to 25 litres per capita / day for drinking considering the availability of other sources of water forbathing, washing and other purposes. It is necessary to carry out a study to assess the drinking waterrequirement.
An alternative method of supply of drinking water in these areas would be by desalinisation of sea
water or brackish water, for which desalinisation package plants are available in different
capacities and can be selected depending on the water demand. As this system requires
uninterrupted power supply generators, solar power plants may also be required.
The proposal is to assess the requirements in affected areas, feasibility of use of desalinisation
package plants including cost of operation and maintenance, initially set up desalinisation plants
with other supportive equipment, in Hambantota district and subsequently in other districts.

Objectives:
To improve the quantity of available drinking water supply to affected divisions of Hambantota
district and subsequently in other districts and provide water supply using desalinisation plants.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
Initially Hambantota district and other districts subsequently203R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
i.
ii.
iii.

Assessment of potable water requirements in affected areas
Assessment of feasibility of this method including cost of O&M
Augment water supply through desalinisation plants

Output:Drinking water supplied to affected divisions of Hambantota district and subsequently
in other districts

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)- SLR 600 million (USD 6.0 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 600 million (USD 6.0 mi)

Funding status:
Local / International Funds Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General- DMC, LocalAuthorities, NWS&DB

204

R o a d

M-16

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aProvision of Solid Waste Disposal Systems as a
Solution to the Solid Waste Hazard in Urban Areas

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HRDisaster Management Centre (DMC)
Provincial Councils (PCs)
Local Authorities (LAs)Sri Lanka Institute of Local Governance (SLILG)
Provincial Commissioner of Local Governance (PCLGs)

Background and rationale:
Solid waste disposal has been a problem for several years now and with the rapid development andthe changing living styles of citizens this will in time take disastrous proportions. It is necessary tocurtail this trend on one side with awareness creation among the general population and on theother, finding a solution to the rapidly increasing quantities of solid waste, especially in urban areas.
The solid wastes generated by different sources are of different physical and chemical
characteristics. Generally city wastes would consist of elements such as, ferrous and non metals,
coarse and fine earth, stone, bricks, glass, ceramics, paper / cardboard, wood, rags, rubber andleather, plastics etc. Hospital wastes and wastes generated by some specific productions may beeven lethal and thus need incineration. The general city solid wastes are not so and could be
disposed of in alternative eco friendly ways. Particularly for large quantities of city wastes,incineration may not be environmentally friendly, but can be adopted in specific cases whenquantities are small and no alternative method can be found. City solid waste is generally
categorised as wet and the process takes a longer time and the fuel consumption for incineration ishigher, which facts also has to be considered. In cases where incineration method is selectedarrangements for O&M cost need to be made.
The most suitable eco friendly method of disposal would be composting coupled together withrecycling of non-biodegradable elements of the wastes. Paper could be recycled for very good uses.
Small industrialists can be motivated for undertaking recycling projects for metals, glass, ceramics,
paper / cardboard, rubber, leather, plastics etc.
For composting of solid waste what is mainly required is the land free of cost, which would bearound 15 acres for 100 tons/day of solid waste. For example, at present Colombo MC generates
solid waste around 600 tons/day which can increase with time. Total solid waste generation ofKotte, Dehiwala-Mt. Lavinia and Moratuwa MCs and Maharagama UC taken together may bearound the same.
205

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

In Sri Lanka and in the region there are companies undertaking such composting ventures on
Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT) basis, the terms of which would be very beneficial to LAs.
For example their conditions for a given city may be such as, a land in a suitable location at around
15 acres for 100 tons/day of solid waste, collecting and transporting the solid waste to the given
land as per the agreement. There is no payment by the client authority to the company involved,
other than the land to be provided and the solid waste transported to the location. A land in the dry
zone would be most suitable for the process of composting, and still more convenient if close to arailway track, so that the waste can be transported by rail. Government land in selected areas may
be obtained on 99 year lease basis. In case of small LAs private land may be obtained on someconditions. Even coconut land is suitable without harming the cultivation. In locations such as
Dambulla, where the waste is predominantly biodegradable, this sort of arrangement will be very
apt.
The company can decide what they do with the compost produced and other by products. Sorting ofwaste, recycling of non-biodegradable elements etc. will be the responsibility of the company. At
the same time they may agree to sell the compost to the client LAat a lower price if the client wishes
to, which can be included in the agreement.
In this context it may be viable to assess the situation in selected large MCs and UCs and decide on
the method to be adopted and call for specific proposals, either composting or incinerating.
With respect to funds, in the case of incinerators initial funding will be required with O&M costborne by the respective LAs. In case of composting, after obtaining state land, funding is required
for establishing the infrastructure - transportation system to the site, after which monthly
operational cost could be borne by the respective LAs.

Objective:
To reduce the hazardous situation arising from the improper management of solid waste andprevent it taking disastrous proportions in time to comeTime frame of implementation:
Year 1-10 (2006-2015) Short, medium and long term

Geographical area of implementation:
Stage I MCs and major UCs
Stage II Other selected UCs and major PSs
Stage III Other selected UCs and PSs

206

40 LAs30 LAs30 LAsR o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) : Stage I
a. Assessment/survey of different LAs for quantities and type of waste (May be alreadyavailable with most LAs)b. Decide whether to go for composting or incinerators considering the quantities and type ofwaste
c. In case of composting solution, decide on locations of land for different LAs considering
the distances and mode of transport
d. In case of incinerators decide on the numbers and specifications for supply coupled withrecruitment of the needed operators and training for them.
e. Implement for most urgent LAs selected under Stage I
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
f. Carry out activities a) to e) as above for LAs selected under Stage II
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)
g. Carry out activities a) to e) as above for LAs selected under Stage III

Output:Strategy for solid waste disposal decided and implemented in LAs in a phased out manner

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 1200 million (USD 12.0 mi)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - SLR 1000 million (USD 10.0 mi)
Year 5-10 (2011-2015) - SLR 800 million (USD 8.0 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 3000 million (USD 30.0 mi)

Funding status:International / Local Funds Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR, Director General- Disaster Management Centre (DMC)
Director, Sri Lanka Institute of Local Governance (SLILG)
Provincial Councils (PCs), Local Authorities (LAs) and Provincial Commissioners of Local
Governance (PCLGs)

207

Chapter 7
Community-based Disaster Risk Management

7.1

Key Issues

Communities bear the primary impact of disasters, yet the first and continued response todisasters comes from community members. Well prepared and protected communities are
the first line of defence against disasters and a key to reducing vulnerability and increasing
disaster resilience. Having a well resourced and sustainable programme to advance
Community-based Disaster Risk Management (CBDRM) is therefore a key strategy toachieve a safer Sri Lanka.
However, so far there has been insufficient coordination between the efforts of theGovernment at District and Divisional level action planning and the interventions ofNGOs at the community level. After the devastating tsunami, there is significantly greater
acceptance within the country (and among international donors) of the country's relatively
high vulnerability to disasters. A result of this is a greater willingness to invest resourcesin pre-disaster preparedness and mitigation, especially at the community level. This
represents a significant opportunity for initiating and undertaking a national programmeon CBDRM.

7.2

Strategy

Sri Lanka has 25 districts, 325 divisions, about 14016 GN Divisions and about 40,000 villages.
Several districts and divisions face multiple hazard risks. Over 50 percent of these communities
are prone to one or more natural hazard risks. This component aims to establish a sustained
national programme to build the resilience and community level capacity for natural disaster risk
management and conflict resolution and peace building in each vulnerable community at risk. This
will be achieved in a phased manner over the next 10 years through establishing:209

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a-Community DRM teams in 20,000 villages over 2500 GN divisions
An effective national network of local level volunteers for DRM
Effective coordination mechanisms between Government and NGOs at the National,
Provincial, District, Division and GN division levels
CBDRM resource centres in 25 districts
Shared methodologies for CBDRM implementation and training
Small grants programme for community teams to support community level DRM projects
Development of micro-finance schemes for vulnerability reduction and mitigation-

Applied research grants for community level programmes
Training of key state and non-state actors at the local level in mediation,
Promoting mechanisms for communities to seek accountability and express grievances
Empower local administration to assume greater responsibility for disaster management-

Priority programmes to be taken up in the first 2 years (2006-2007) are:- Community DRM teams in 5,000 villages over 500 GN divisions with a network ofvolunteers; Estimated budget: USD 5 million
CBDRM resource centres in 10 districts; Estimated budget: USD 2 million-

Small grants programme awarding up to 500 grants to community teams to support
community level DRM projects; Estimated budget: USD 6 million

To implement a programme on this scale, a range of stakeholders is required, primarily NGOs
working with LG and community authorities. It is expected that the primary responsibility forsupporting the establishment of community DRM teams and implementing CBDRM
programmes will lie with NGOs, CBOs and the SLRCS working closely with local agencies. It
will also provide suitable opportunities for government institutions, technical agencies anduniversities to undertake CBDRM applied research work. The anticipated role of the DMC is tofacilitate coordination of geographical areas for undertaking programmes, supporting linkages
between CBDRM teams and NGOs with GN Division, the division and district officials and as
well as to establish and administer the small grants programme and applied research grants
programme.
The government is implementing a strategy of poverty alleviation through the Samurdi
programme and the risk management approaches can be integrated with community-based
infrastructure projects, micro-credit schemes, and cash for work programmes initiated by the
Samurdi movement. One of the key strategies would be to identify areas where CBDRM
practices can be integrated into Samurdi and Gemipubuduwa programme activities.
i.

210

Community DRM Teams in 20,000 Villages over 2500 GN Divisions
This sub component seeks to establish community teams for DRM in a phased manner in
all at-risk communities in the country. These community DRM teams will be responsible

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

for EW, preparedness, response and mitigation.
The sub-component will support the establishment of these teams, provide initialorientation and training, support undertaking of village level hazard, vulnerability andcapacity assessments, preparation of response and evacuation plans, and identification of
micro projects on mitigation. The teams will be provided periodic training and will be
expected to conduct periodic drills and rehearsals.
An effective linkage of CBDM groups will be established with divisional and GN DM
committees and DM plans. The first phase of the programme over a 2 year period of 2006 to2007 will target 5000 villages in 500 GN divisions in 10 districts.
ii.

An Effective National Network of Local Level Volunteers for DRM
This sub-component seeks to establish a national scheme of community disaster
response volunteers. These volunteers will support dissemination of EW, assist in
evacuation, search and rescue, provide first aid and medical first response, and support therunning of camps. They will be active members of the CBDRM groups. The component
will support registration of volunteers in a database and also the maintenance of thisdatabase available at the GN Division, DS Division and District offices. A suitable scheme
for providing recognition, probably in the form of certificates and identity cards will beestablished. A standardised curriculum and large scale programme of training of thesevolunteers is to be undertaken. The sub-component will build on the ongoing efforts of
DMC to deploy District DM coordinators and identify community leaders to take the leadin EW dissemination and evacuation, as well as the well established Red Cross Volunteer
frameworkof SLRCS, where a major expansion is planned.

iii.

Establishing CBDRM Resource Centres in Each District
This sub-component will establish CBDRM resource centres in each district. These
resource centres are expected to play the role of facilitator for CBDRM activities and teamsin the district, provide technical support, support the District Secretaries in maintenance of
database, as well as undertake documentation and dissemination of CBDRM's experience.
It is proposed to identify agencies at the District level (universities, technical institutions,NGOs, Divisional Secretary's offices) who are willing to take on this role and support
them in strengthening their capacities to serve this function. In some districts, these mayneed to be set up afresh. The sub-component will fund the establishment of these centres,
and provision of staff and equipment as well as some initial funding for activities.

iv.

Small Grants Programme
It is planned to create a CBDRM Small Grants Programme to support the implementationof priority community preparedness and mitigation projects by community DRM teams in
211R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k ahigh risk villages and GN Divisions. Priority project will cover assessment of local
hazards, vulnerabilities, and capacities, preparedness planning, procurement ofresponse equipment, resource mobilisation, capacity building and implementing small
mitigation projects. 500 grants are expected to be awarded in the first two years.
v.

Applied Research Grant Scheme for Government Agencies to Implement Community Level
Risk Management Programmes
It is planned to establish a fund in the DMC to award annual applied research grants togovernment institutions, local government institutions, universities, academic institutions,and professional bodies to implement mitigation and risk management programmes at thecommunity level in partnership with at-risk communities.

vi.

Develop a Micro-Finance Scheme to Reduce Vulnerability at Household Level andPromote Alternative Livelihood Options
This sub-component will work with Sri Lankan micro-finance institutions to support theestablishment of schemes to enable vulnerable communities in hazard prone locations to
identify and take up alternate and additional livelihood options, as well as invest in
mitigation measures to improve the disaster resilience of household and livelihood assets.

vii.

Training of key State and Non-state Actors at the Local Level in Mediation
Through the sub-component the capacity of key actors at the local level such as Grama
Sevakas and local citizen's committee will be strengthened in the area of conflict
resolution and peace building though mediation training.

viii.

Promoting Mechanisms for Communities to seek Accountability and Express Grievances
An independent and effective redress mechanism for complaints/grievances in relation
to disasters will be created in close collaboration with the Human Rights Commission.

ix.

Empower Local Administration to assume Greater Responsibility in Disaster Management
This sub-component aims to strengthen local government and participatory democracy asenvisaged by the Commission on Local Government Reform, 2000, in order to revitalise
and empower local government to respond to emerging challenges relating to DRM.

7.3

Project Proposals

The following are priority projects to be implemented in a phased manner over the next 10 years
with regard to community based disaster management:

212

CBDM-1

Promotion of CBDRM Volunteerism

CBDM-2

Establishing Resource Centres

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

CBDM-3

Preparedness and Mitigation through Small Grants Programmes

CBDM-4Development and Implementation of Micro-Finance Schemes

CBDM-5National CBDRM Programme

CBDM-6

Applied Research Grant Scheme for CBDRM

CBDM-7Landmines and Unexploded Ordnances

CBDM-8

Alternative and Informal Dispute Resolution Mechanisms and Improving
Services from State Actors

CBDM-9

Faciliation of the Creation of Local Citizens Committees

CBDM-10

Strenghtening Particpatory Democracy- Local Government

CBDM-11Creatiing a Special Disaster Response Ombudsman

CBDM-12

Issues of Subsidiarity in Situations of Emergency

CBDM-13Strengthening Human Rights in Tsunami Recovery

213

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

CBDM-1i n

S r i L a n k a

Promoting Community Volunteerism

Agencies involved:
DMC, District Secretaries and DM Committees, Divisional Secretaries, LAs in collaboration
with CBOs and NGOs, SLRCS

Background and rationale:
Disaster survivors and community members are the first responders in most disaster situations.
Despite the fact that many villages in Sri Lanka have faced disasters in the past, the community based
initiatives for disaster preparedness and response are limited to a few pockets in the country.
Community-based disaster preparedness plans need to be developed for vulnerable villages. There isa need to identify volunteers and train them on different DM components. The vulnerable
communities are not properly linked with government mechanism, due to lack of institutional
capacity at local levels.
This will help in development of disaster resilient community programmes, with focus on moresustainable livelihood patterns. A number of organisations such as the SLRCS, ITDG, CARE etc,
are currently implementing disaster mitigation programmes in various parts of the country.
However coordination among these agencies needs to be improved, to enable better utilisation of
resources for a multi-hazard approach. Coordination is also required to prevent duplication ofsome activities in the same area and to ensure equitable distribution of their services.
It is necessary to promote community disaster response volunteers and establish community
teams for DRM in a phased manner in all at-risk communities in the country and a system ofregistration of volunteers with districts / divisions / local authorities. A database of volunteers
needs to be developed and maintained. A sustainable system must be established to maintainvolunteers' skills through training and motivation.

Objectives:
To develop a strategy for increased participation of volunteers and commitment of atrisk communities in risk reduction interventions in vulnerable geographies.
To establish community DRM teams in all at-risk communities.
To establish and maintain a volunteer database for use in emergencies

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006 to 2007) - Short-term - 500 GN. Divisions
Year 3-5 (2008 to 2010) - Medium term -1000 GN. Divisions
Year 6-10 (2011 to 2015) - Long-term - 3000 GN. Divisions214R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
The disaster prone GN divisions in the 10 districts of Galle, Matara, Hambantota, Ampara,
Trincomalee, Gampaha, Ratnapura, Puttlum, Badulla and Nuwara Eliya. These districts have been
selected taking into consideration tsunami, cyclones, floods, drought, landslides and coastal
erosion as potential hazards. The selection of vulnerable GN divisions will be done according to
information furnished by the National, District & Divisional level institutions and LAs. This will bebased on historical records of disasters as well.

Activities:
a. Establishing community DRM teams in each 'at-risk community' to undertake Village level
activities of EW, preparedness, response and mitigationb. Developing volunteer facilitators inclusive of their capacity building and training.
c. Identifying and selecting volunteers to serve in vulnerable communities during disasterevents (first aid, Search and Rescue (SAR), camp maintenance, etc.)
d. Providing training to selected volunteer groupse. Conducting periodic drills and rehearsals linked with SLRCS branch activities.
f. Establishing revolving funds at community levelg. Establishing a database of volunteers at National level, in each district, and GN areas and at
the LAlevel.
h. Provide Identity Cards / support local recognition

Outputs:- Community DRM teams established in all at-risk communities- Volunteer database established and maintained for use in emergencies- Volunteers from a specified number of GN divisions from 10 districts trained andstationed in respective villages, with their roles specified in Community-based disaster
preparedness plans

Budget:Year 1- 2 (2006-2008)
Year 3- 5 (2008-2010)
Year 6- 10 (2011-2015)
Total budget-SLR 500 million (USD 5.0mi)-SLR 1000 million (USD 10.0mi)-SLR 3000 million (USD 30.0mi)-SLR 4500 million (USD 45.0 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required.

215

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aContact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 /73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
District Secretaries, Divisional Secretaries, LocalAuthorities
Sri Lanka Red Cross Society and branches at district and divisional levels,
Heads of National & International NGOs
UNDP, PracticalAction (ITDG), CHPB216

R o a d

CBDM-2

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Establishing CBDM Resource Centres

Agencies involved:
DMC, District Secretaries in collaboration with CBOs and NGOs, Universities, technicalinstitutions

Background and rationale:
Establishment of CBDRM resource centres in Sri Lanka is a relatively new activity. But as a country
which faces disasters repeatedly a resource centre is essential. Presently a large number of NGOs areworking on DM but the concept of establishing a resource centre has not yet been implemented.
The purpose of a resource centre is not only to make available information on technology/ models
available to communities and NGOs, but also to improve adaptation of communities to new knowledge
and improve ownership of community based programmes through building on coping mechanisms,
using local wisdom and higher participation. The concept involves picture display or demonstration
models ofgood practices, new or improvedtechnology,themeparks,“How to”manuals,etc.

Objectives:
To increase access to information on community based initiatives for sharing of experienceand lessons leant.
To set up CBDM Resource Centres in each district, consisting of picture display ordemonstration models of best practices, new or improved technology, theme parks, “Howto” manuals, awareness materials and publications etc.
To facilitate research activities on CBDRM encouraging research on the application of
CBDRM concepts at the grassroots level in collaboration with development agencies(government and non-government)
Facilitate monitoring and evaluation of various CBDRM activities

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006 to 2007) - Short term -10 Districts
Year 3-5 (2008 to 2010) - Medium term - 10 Districts
Year 5-10 (2011 to 2015) - Long-term - 5 Districts

Geographical area of implementation:
10 districts have been selected in the first phase and a resource centre is to be established first ineach district and subsequently in the whole country.
217

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
a. Identify agencies at district level (Universities, technical institutions, NGOs, Divisional
Secretariats) willing to take on role of facilitator, technical support provider, and support tomaintenance of data base, as well as documentation and dissemination of experienceb. Provide recognition and support to these agencies
c. Involve leaders in Disaster Management committees set up at various levels.
d. Organize periodic Networking events and joint Drills
e. Development of database through a registration system of CBOs, NGOs and community teams
for effective networking
f. Organize exchange programmes for sharing experience among volunteer groups within the
district, within the country and worldwide if possible

Output:Resource centres developed in 25 districts

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2008)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)
Total budget-SLR 200 million (USD 2.0 mi)-SLR 200 million (USD 2.0 mi)-SLR 100 million (USD 1.0 mi)-SLR 500 million (USD 5.0 mi)

Funding status:
New funding required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73 Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
Following to be identified in the process:Technical Institutions at district level
District Secretaries, Divisional Secretaries, LAs
Heads of National and International NGOsSLRCS and branches in districts
UNDP, PracticalAction (ITDG), Seva Lanka / Sarvodaya, Care Sri Lanka
Plan International, Rain Water Harvesting Forum, CHA
218

R o a d

CBDM-3

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Preparedness and Mitigation through
Small Grants Programmes

Agencies involved:
DMC, District Secretaries, Divisional Secretaries, Local Authorities, GN Divisions, NGOs and
CBOs

Background and rationale:
Communities usually develop their coping mechanisms over a period of time, to respond todisasters and mitigate its impacts on them, their livestock, property and environment. However,there is a need to support communities to invest their time and resources in maintaining andimproving their environment and reducing the risks of natural / man made hazards. There are
instances worldwide that reflect the fact that community participation in developments projects
not only helps in reduced costs of the intervention, but also sustainability, on account ofoperations, and maintenance, due to higher levels of ownership.
A link between disasters and development may be found at community level planning. Measures toreduce vulnerability are often a community's first priority, which government administration andother stakeholders facilitate from their development budgets. This helps improve the community's
capacities and also links it to mainstream development plans. Such measures require a paradigm
shift in programme planning and all round capacity building, in order to encourage community
mobilisation, and to initiate programme design and implementation.
In this context the introduction of a programme to provide guidance and financial support would
greatly benefit the communities in enhancing their preparedness and resilience.

Objectives:.

To encourage community DRM teams to actively implement preparedness and mitigation
projects
To implement small grants programme through DMC, to support such projects
To encourage CBOs and other community groups to be involved in DM programme planning
To promote disaster resistant sustainable livelihood options to encourage development
among the most vulnerable communities

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 5 (2006-2010) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
All vulnerable areas in the country, based on hazard specific risk analysis.
219

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities
Phase I: (2006-2007) : 500 projects
a. Develop frameworktoassess riskprofileofcommunities fromidentified vulnerability mapping.
b. Develop guidelines and have coordination meetings with District Secretaries, CBOs andNGOsc. Establish small grants programme for community teams
d. Discuss and encourage undertaking of pilot projects in high risk villages based on
proposals from community teams, facilitated by DSs, LAs, Red Cross and NGOs.
e. Pilot projects to cover assessment of local hazards, vulnerabilities, and capacities,
preparedness planning, resource mobilization, capacity building and implementing small
mitigation projects.
f. Monitoring and knowledge sharing, for wider dissemination of good practices.
Phase II: (2008-2010) : 750 projects
g. Expand the scope of these activities in all vulnerable areas
h. 750 projects in Phase II

Output:Small grants programme framework established and implemented through DMC, tosupport Community DRM teams in high risk villages and GN Divisions, to actively
implement preparedness and mitigation projects; encourage CBOs and other community
groups to get involved in DM programme planning; and to promotedisaster resistantsustainable livelihood options of development among the most vulnerable communities.
500 projects in Phase I and 750 projects in Phase II implemented.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2008)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total budget-SLR 600 million (USD 6.0mi)-SLR 1000 million (USD 10.0mi)-SLR 1600 million (USD 16.0 mi)

Funding status:
Additional Funding Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73 Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
District Secretaries, Divisional Secretaries, Local Authorities, GN Divisions, Sri Lanka Red Cross,
UNDP, NGOs and CBOs
220

R o a d

CBDM-4

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Development and Implementation of
Micro-Finance Schemes

Agencies involved:
DMC in partnership with LAs, aid agencies in collaboration with banks, NGOs and technicalinstitutions.

Background and rationale:
The community coping mechanisms, supported by institutional safety nets provide enoughopportunities for people to reduce the loss of productive time, efforts and resources, caused bynatural or manmade hazards. This helps bring about an improvement in the environment as also theeconomic status, by enabling them to utilise their own and their family members' spare time indiversified/ supportive income generation activities and improvement in.Providing micro-financefacilities of these vulnerable people by introducing alternative livelihood options available will
largely help them in capacity building.

Objectives:
To develop a scheme providing micro-finance facilities to help increase participation of at-risk
communities in risk reduction through implementation of CBDRM projects and throughgovernment-sponsored Samurdi programmes in hazard-prone areas, in partnership with andtechnical support from technical, academic and LG institutions.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 3- 5 (2008-2010) - Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
In Phase I country wide, where community based DRM is being implemented and in Phase 2,
communities with low income and moderate risk to disasters.

Activities:
1.
2.
3.

Meeting with LAs, representatives of NGOs and CBOs, to discuss community
vulnerabilities and principal and supportive livelihood options.
Develop and disseminate a scheme for selection and grant of awards including criteria for
selection and approval of projects. (indicative size of grant SLRs 0.5 million to 5 million)
Establish guidelines and introduce new alternative livelihood options for vulnerable
221R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k acommunities and for Samurdi projects in hazard prone areas.
Organise micro-finance facilities through community centered organisations.
Develop case studies based on the lessons learnt for wider dissemination, and expand thescope of these activities in other vulnerable geographies.

4.
5.

Outputs:
Micro-finance facilities made available for capacity building of vulnerable people andalternative livelihood options introduced
Micro-finance for household level mitigation measures made possible, throughcommunity revolving funds.

Budget:Year 1-3 (2008-2010)1000 projects- SLR 500 million(USD 5.0 mi)

Total budget- SLR 500 million(USD 5.0 mi)

Funding status:
Initial Capital through Banks andAidAgencies.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73 Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
Aid agencies in collaboration with Banks, Sanasa, SLRCS, SEEDS, NGOs,
Technical institutions, CBOs222

R o a d

CBDM-5

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

National Community-based Disaster
Risk Management Programme

Agencies involved:
DMC, District Secretaries, Divisional Secretaries, LAs, relevant NGOs and CBOs

Background and rationale:
In most disaster prone countries there is an involvement of NGOs and local community
organisations, in community development projects, mostly localised in nature and scope of
implementation. At times, risk reduction in one area may lead to increased risk in another, an
argument usually given against big dams. A macro-level analysis of such small scale projects at
National/ District levels provides opportunities for government institutions to guide local
implementing partners in highlighting the consequences of one project over another, and thus
avoid such interventions. This calls for a mechanism to be developed to ensure that NGO
programmes are coordinated, and are focused in reducing overall vulnerability, and improving
community resilience.
There is a need to identify focal persons at District and Local levels, who will coordinate
vulnerability/ risk assessment data with organisations who wish to involve in risk reduction
measures through community level interventions, and will keep an overview of overall impact ofsuch interventions on a regular basis, in line with the DMC framework.

Objective:
To have a smooth operational coordination to implement National Programme on CBDRM.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium Term

Geographical area of implementation:
National level, District level and LAlevel coordination system.

Activities:
1.
2.

To identify focal persons at National, District and Divisional levels, and with LA for the
programme
To develop a mechanism for periodic meetings with organisations carrying out a small
scale mitigation/ preparedness programme.
223

R o a d

M a p

3.

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Support identification of risk factors and appropriate methodologies for risk
management at various levels.
Support impact analysis of such interventions on other communities and selection ofbest options.
Documenting good practices and sharing among CBOs, NGOs and other organisations
involved in DM activities in Sri Lanka
To have a common training curriculum on CBDRM
Support finalisation of programmes, geographical areas, methodologies as required.

4.
5.
6.
7.

Output:National CBDRM Programme and a national coordination mechanism established between DMC,
local administration and NGOs to promote CBDRM

Budget:Year 1-3 (2008-2010)- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Total budget- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73 Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
District Secretaries, Divisional Secretaries, LocalAuthorities, Relevant NGOs and CBOs

224

R o a d

CBDM-6

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Applied Research Grant Scheme for Communitybased Disaster Risk Management

Agencies involved:
DMC in partnership with academic institutes/ professional bodies, LAs, agencies, governmentalorganisations and NGOs working on CBDRM.

Background and rationale:
Participation of private and professional sections of the society, especially academicians,
researchers, private sectors and individual enthusiasts, remain weak in the absence of an
institutional framework. The best practice examples worldwide on community based programmes
highlight the importance of the role this sector plays, in bringing non-conventional ways andmethods of doing things, or technologies which are people / environment friendly.
To promote involvement of professionals and private sector, there is a need to initiate and invest
small grants, aimed at research in community level risk reduction measures.

Objectives:
To implement risk management projects at the community level by government
institutions, LG institutions, and professional bodies in partnership with at-risk
communities through applied research grants
To promote research studies on technical as well as sociological aspects on DM
To encourage organisations to apply them in DM activities.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
Nation-wide intervention, based on vulnerability and interest by professional bodies.

Activities:
1.
2.
3.
4.

Develop a scheme for selection and grant of awards, including criteria for selection,
approval of projects. (Indicative size of grant 0.5 5.0 Million SLR)
Organise sharing opportunities among participants to enhance the effectiveness.
Develop case studies based on lessons learned for wider dissemination.
Expand the scope of the intervention for all vulnerable areas.
225R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Output:Increased participation of at-risk communities in risk reduction activities through theimplementation of CBDRM projects with technical support from technical, academic and LG
institutions.

Budget:Year 1-3 (2008-2010) - SLR 200 million (USD 2.0 mi)
Total budget- SLR 200 million (USD 2.0 mi)

Funding status:
Initial Capital through Banks andAidAgencies.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
Academic Institutes/ professional bodies, Local authorities agencies, Governmental and nongovernment organisations working on CBDRM

226

R o a d

CBDM 7

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aLandmines and Unexploded Ordnances (UXO)

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministry of Nation Building, Armed Forces, National and International
Organisations involved in MineAction/ Risk Education

Background and Rationale:
Landmines and UXO are security issues affecting returnees and IDPs in the North-East. Over six
hundred communities are known to be affected by mines, with 1290 civilian victims (1099 injured,
191 killed). The presence of landmines and UXO not only prevents the return of IDPs, but also
renders land unusable for agricultural, commercial and industrial purposes. Accordingly,
landmines and UXO reinforce poverty by denying safe access to land. It further leads todestruction and disruption of infrastructure such as transportation, irrigation systems becoming
unusable, exhaustion of medical and rehabilitation services, destruction of the environment, andthe economic cost of humanitarian de-mining. Further, land mines have an adverse impact on
livelihoods.
In conflict-affected areas where health facilities are poor or sometimes non-existent, the provisionof immediate medical assistance for mine injuries is minimal. Further, survivors suffer long-term
physical, psychological and economic consequences as a result of mine injuries. Children amountto almost 30% of mine casualties. In addition to physical disabilities sustained in a mine blast,children also suffer severe psychological trauma and continue to require special care for several
years. The use of landmines and their effect on children violates the Convention on the Rights of
the Child (CRC), ratified by Sri Lanka.
In certain cases disability carries a stigma that can deny a young man or woman the possibility ofmarriage, education or employment. It is therefore important to design rehabilitation programs that
promote individual, family and social healing, recovery, understanding and social reintegration.
These programs should empower the survivors so that as they play an active and decisive rolerather than a dependent 'victim' role. Families of survivors, and the community as a whole, need tobe counseled in dealing with disabled persons and assisting them in the reintegration process.
Several activities have been initiated by the Government and other stakeholders under the National
Steering Committee for Mine Action (NSCMA). Sri Lanka's comprehensive humanitarian Mine
Action Programme was launched in 2002. The Strategy for Mine Action Sri Lanka, drafted by the
Ministry of Nation Building and Development, is focused on resettlement and reconstruction.
227

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Objectives:-

Reduction and elimination of the use of landmines and UXOs-

To mitigate harm caused by the use of landmines and UXOs, and enhance support
services available to landmine victims and families

Time Frame for Implementation:
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium Term

GeographicalAreas of Implementation:
Conflict affected areas of the country mine zones

Activities:-

The ongoing process of demining should be accelerated, with additional funds andresources directed to demining efforts.

-

Mine Risk Education should be intensified, targeting welfare centers and IDP camps inaddition to their usual education activities in order to inform communities. Mine Risk
Education should be provided to IDPs prior to their return or resettlement.

-

Educate and build awareness in communities, as survivors need the help of the community
in order to successfully reintegrate.

-

Assistance to mine survivors should incorporate both physical and psycho-social
rehabilitation and social and economic reintegration. Community-based Rehabilitation
Programs should be encouraged to seek to achieve socio-economic reintegration of
disabled persons by changing societal structures, ensuring their inclusion and participationin mainstream development and welfare, and promoting and protecting their rights throughequalization of opportunities. There should be scope for income generation projects,
assistance delivery and social welfare benefits.
Educate children on the landmine problem in Sri Lanka.

-

Emergency financial assistance scheme should be made available for those injured andtheir families. The duration may depend on the extent of injury and the economic status of
the injured-

There should be a surveillance system introduced to monitor injury caused by landmines

Outputs:-

Mine Risk Education programmes designed for welfare centres and IDP camps-

Development of Community-based Rehabilitation programmes for landmine survivors

228

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

-

Emergency FinancialAssistance Scheme for landmine victims and families-

Monitoring and recording mechanism for injuries caused by landmines

S r i L a n k a

Budget:Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Total Budget- - -Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Ministry of Nation Building, Armed Forces, National and International Organisations involvedin MineAction/ Risk Education229

R o a d

M a p

f o r

CBDM 8D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Alternative and Informal Dispute Resolution
Mechanisms and Improving Services from State Actors

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministry of Nation Building, Armed Forces, National and International
Organisations involved in MineAction/ Risk Education

Background and rationale:
Local disputes, be they ethnic, religious, political, commercial or even family, have the ability to
disrupt and impair social relations and community links. Local disputes also have the potential forlarge-scale violence, particularly when they prey on existing social cleavages. The need foralternative and informal dispute resolution mechanisms has long been recognized and utilized,
especially given the constraints and limitations of law enforcement and judicial authorities in Sri
Lanka and the implications of some of the disputes. Currently a host of actors serve as dispute
resolution mechanisms, including traditional mechanisms such as village elders and religious
committees; governmental actors such as the Grama Sevaka or the police; local government
politicians and other political actors; and NGO-established committees, which often use andstrengthen already existing structures, be they local village elders or religious committees.
While recognizing the critical role these mechanisms serve, there is a clear need to evaluate thecapacity of these mechanisms to function and to resolve disputes, and their long-term impact. In
particular, the role these mechanisms can and do play in addressing macro-structural problems,
including ethnic relations, needs to be examined. In addition, given the delays and constraints of
the legal and judicial system, the opportunities for addressing disputes that these mechanisms
present, and their limitations to do so should be investigated in order to develop strategies forstrengthening the capacity of these mechanisms.
At present there are a number of programs to strengthen and consolidate existing mechanisms. In
some instances there are efforts to create new mechanisms such as the mediation boards, so as toease the burden of the judicial system and to provide faster service to disputants. The mediation
boards have received training and financial assistance from key multilateral agencies. In others,
there are efforts to create and strengthen networks between key mechanisms such as the NGOs in
the Eastern Province, which have facilitated efforts to address land and other disputes. Other
NGOs, religious institutions and the like, who have a presence in particular villages, haveattempted to strengthen the village-level committees through training and financial assistance tohelp them address local disputes.

230

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Finally, there is a need to explore the work that is already being done with regard to community
policing and mediation by other organizations and to ensure that there is no duplication.

Objective:
To improve the ability of local actors to address local problems locally.

Time frame for implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) Short Term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country; with special emphasis on war-affected districts

Activities:-The main activity is to provide mediation training for identified key local actors. This, however,has to be augmented by additional training and information sessions, and as a part of a wider
structural program where relevant.
-

The Grama Sevaka plays a critical role at the community level, and as a part of his/her
multiple duties has to address local disputes. Providing them training and information
courses in mediation and the law (particularly with regards to people's rights and changes in
the law) would ensure that the GS could provide a better service and that disputes could bebetter managed.

-

The Police are often expected to intervene in a dispute and provide interim solutions and to
reduce tensions. The role the police play is particularly important in disputes that involve
violence or have the potential for violence, as it may have to play the role of mediator, inorder to contain a conflict and to facilitate a return to normalcy. Thus, a critical tool that isrequired is mediation training, which needs to be supplemented with human rights training
so as to ensure that the police is sensitive to, and responds professionally to, civilians.
A more systematic rethinking of police-civilian relations is also required. Adopting a morecommunity-policing approach that ensures greater interaction between the community andthe police would better strengthen the police and the social peace. Creating a Citizens'
Police Monitoring Committee is a key step in this. This committee would have two primary
duties:- To monitor police activities for which the police would have be responsible, would allow
for better relations between civilians and the police and an improvement in services. In

231

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aparticular, monitoring issues such as human rights abuses, including those by the polic, iscritical,- To liaise with the public, particularly during times of tension and violence
the committee could play a vital role in this.
- Community policing is an urgent requirement, in the North-East in particular. It could bea vital step to improve the human rights situation, particularly with regards to obtaining
redress and to contain ethnic violence, which manifests itself in the form of localized
violence and killings. An effective and accessible community policing system can beespecially useful in such situations. Models used in other conflict zones, such as Northern
Ireland, may prove helpful in designing such a system.

Outputs:-

Mediation training relevant to specific sectors.

-

Increased access to information and skills training for officials.

-

Citizens' Police Monitoring Committees

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007 - SLR 35 mi (USD 0.35 mi )Total Budget- SLR 35 mi (USD 0.35 mi )Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Institutions identified for mediation training including Police, Gram Sevakas and Ministry ofJustice232R o a d

CBDM 9

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Facilitation of the Creation of Local Citizens Committees

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministry of Local Government, Provincial and Local Government Institutions,
NGOs and religious leaders in the districts.

Background and Rationale:
The Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights would consider facilitating the creationof Citizens Committees to deal with tensions, disasters and emergency situations, facilitating
linkages with local government institutions and other governmental and non-governmental
sectors. The independence and autonomy of such committees must be respected.
The Citizen's Committees could also have a wider mandate - dealing with issues of ethnic andreligious tensions that might occur, encouraging citizen participation in local and community
development etc. A special effort should be made to involve women's participation in Citizens'
Committees.
The Ministry could offer support for the activities of Citizen's Committees if they request suchassistance. The assistance could be in the form of training programmes in disaster preparedness,
conflict resolution and peace studies.

Objectives:-

To encourage citizen involvement, vigilance and partnership to deal with human disasters;-

To promote inter-ethnic and inter-religious harmony and understanding and respect forpluralism;

Time frame of implementation:
Years 1-2 (2006-2007) Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country; with priority in tsunami affected areas, and districts with a multi-ethnic
character.

233

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:-

Develop a programme to facilitate the establishment of Citizen's Committees.

-

Develop a programme for the mandate of the committees.

-

Facilitate the activities of committees needing assistance.

Outputs:
Anetwork of Citizens' Committees organized and focused to deal with human disasters.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Total Budget- SLR 30 mi (USD 0.30 mi)- SLR 30 mi (USD 0.30 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Ministry of Local Government, Provincial and Local Government Institutions, NGOs andreligious leaders in the districts.

234

R o a d

CBDM 10

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aStrengthening Participatory Democracy Local Government

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Local Government, Provincial and Local Government Institutions, and civil society
organisations.

Background and rationale:
The Ministry would, in a step that is related to the wider governance and subsidiarity issues, revive
debate on the issue of strengthening local government. A Special Presidential Commission on
Local Government was established in the late 1990s and it published a comprehensive report that
included proposals for reform. A public debate should be encouraged on these recommendations
with an additional focus- the role of local government in disaster management and response. In thedebate on constitutional reform that has taken place in the country since 1994, the focus of attention
has understandably been on the provincial/regional tier of government as a second level ofgovernment. Local Government or the third tier of government is extremely important too andindeed in the plural north and east of the country will have to play an important role in protecting therights of regional minorities.
The powers of local government institutions in Sri Lanka when compared with institutions in otherdemocracies are relatively weak despite the fact that Sri Lanka has a long tradition of local
government. There is a need for radical law reform to revitalize local government, equip such areenergized local government regime to respond to modern demands and challenges including the
response to disasters, and give them legal protection from unjustified encroachment on theirpowers from the first two tiers of government.
As a general policy, when initiating discussion on issues, rather than embarking on a process thathas a “reinventing the wheel approach”, the Ministry would always stress the importance ofinstitutional memory and a non-partisan approach to the issue by building on existing studies,
reports and moving ahead, rather than starting at the beginning. Such an approach particularly inthe areas of local government reform, media reform and on a freedom of information bill isimportant as there are many excellent reports and proposals on these subjects produced in the mid
to late 1990s which remain unimplemented.

Objectives-

To strengthen local government and participatory democracy;-

To facilitate constitutional reform for conflict resolution;-

To implement the proposals of the Commission on Local Government Reform- 2000
235

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aTime frame for implementation
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:-

Engage in a literature survey of studies on local government, reform proposals.

-

Conduct a series of seminars on the Commission Report 2000.

-

If necessary have a supplementary study to consider more specifically and in greater
detail- the electoral system, women's participation and disaster management withreference to local government.

Outputs:
Strengthened local government institutions and increased public participation in local government
reform.

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Total Budget- SLR 12 mi (USD 0.12 mi)- SLR 12 mi (USD 0.12 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Local Government, Provincial and Local Government Institutions, and Civil Society
Organisations236

R o a d

CBDM 11

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aCreating a Special Disaster Response Ombudsmen

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministries of Constitutional Affairs and Justice, the Human Rights Commisssion, theOmbudsman

Background and Rationale:
Many countries have in recent times moved in the direction of creating specialist Ombuds(Ombudsmen). In Sri Lanka too after many years of dependence on a general Ombudsman,specialist Ombuds in areas such as tax and insurance have been established. Given the fact that in
Sri Lanka disasters, both natural and human, are not isolated events but continuing events that haveto be prepared for, an Ombud to deal with such issues, respond to complaints, grievances, help in
the provision of information, who develops an expertise in the area, will be useful. Such an Ombud
should be independent and have the necessary capacity and experience to perform his/herfunctions.
The creation of such a specialized Ombud is in no way meant to undermine the powers of existing
institutions such as the Human Rights Commission which deal with allegations of discriminationand injustice. The Special Disaster Response Ombud will focus on a particular set of issues,
develop expertise and experience in dealing with the kinds of issues that arise in situations ofconflict and disaster and relieve the Human Rights Commission of some time consuming work sothat it can concentrate on its larger mandate more effectively. In any event, a citizen will have theoption of applying direct to the Human Rights Commission or pursuing other options as well.
There is a need to explore the feasibility of mechanisms such as the Disaster Relief Monitoring
Unit (set-up as an auxiliary body to the Human Rights Commission for dealing with tsunami
aftermath) as well as to ensure minimum duplication between the work of the Ombud and suchmechanisms.

Objectives:
To provide an independent and effective redress mechanism for complaints/grievances in relation
to disasters.

Time frame for implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) Short Term

237

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:-

Study the viability to creating the special ombudsman by engaging in a comparative studyof specialist ombudsmen.

-

Draft legislation

Outputs:
A specialized grievance /dispute resolution mechanism that has capacity to deal with issues of aparticular nature that arise due to natural and human disasters

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Total Budget-

SLR 10 mi (USD 0.10 mi)- SLR 10 mi (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Ministries of ConstitutionalAffairs and Justice, the Human Rights Commission,
the Ombudsman238

R o a d

CBDM 12

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aIssues of Subsidiarity in Situations of Emergency

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministry of Provincial Council and Local Government, Local Administration,
Provincial Councils, RADA, Civil Society Groups

Background and rationale :Recent governments of Sri Lanka have been committed to devolution of power. However,
over the years there has been also a trend towards the recentralisation of power at the center.
As Sri Lanka continues its search for a political solution to the island's ethnic conflict basedon devolution of power and power sharing, it will be useful to examine the country's politicalculture and responses to challenges to ascertain whether devolution of power is viable andpracticable in reality.
The response to the tsunami should be critically assessed with a view to learning lessons
about responding to national calamities in the context of a constitutional architecture thatprovides for devolution of power and subsidiarity. At a more specific level, and as an
example of the more general crisis of governance that exists in the country, the Ministry
would, in a spirit of constructive criticism, review the post tsunami governmental response
from a governance perspective. Some of the serious criticisms of the post-tsunami policy
response werea) That it was a top-down, highly centralized response that undermined principles ofsubsidiarity.
b) That there was little, if any, people's consultation, opportunities for the victims of thetsunami to participate in the design of their rehabilitation programmes and thatindeed many officials in TAFREN and other governmental agencies saw anopportunity for top-down social engineering in the form of model tourist centers,
modern towns etc. with little or no concern for the people who lived in those areas.
(See the People's Consultation Report of December 2005 facilitated by MONLAR)c) Policies such as those relating to the so-called Buffer Zone caused confusion, wereincompatible with human rights, and caused delays with respect to the constructionof houses.

239

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Objectives:
To develop a disaster management response that is efficient, responsive and in keeping withconstitutional values and devolution of power.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) Short Term

Geographical areas of implementation:
The Tsunami-affected areas

Activities:--

Study the immediate post tsunami-responses in Sri Lanka and other affected countries;
Engage in a comparative study of disaster responses in India, Indonesia with particularreference to devolution of power and principles of subsidiarity;
Develop an action plan for future responses that involves the second and third tiers ofgovernment.

Outputs:-

Amore devolution-sensitive response to national disasters.
Deliberation on a sensitive and important issue that will have a bearing on future
constitutional reform for conflict resolution

Budget:Year 1 - 2 (2006-2007) - SLR 10 mi (USD 0.10 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 10 mi (USD 0.10 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Ministry of Provincial Council and Local Government, Local Administration, Provincial Councils,
RADA, civil society groups240

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

CBDM 13 Strengthening Human Rights in Tsunami Recovery

Agencies involved:
M/DM&HR, Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights, Human Rights Commission
and RADA.

Background and rationale:
The post-tsunami scenario has brought various human rights issues into the forefront. While issues
like resettlement, compensation, transitional and permanent housing and livelihood recovery are
distinct rehabilitation priorities; they each also have human rights dimensions and human rights
implications to them. These aside, there are specific human rights concerns of the more vulnerable
among the tsunami-affected, such as women, children, the elderly, the disabled and the conflictaffected. Furthermore, there are issues relating to the rights of affected-persons to information,
consultation, access and access to redress with regard to the rehabilitation work being carried-out
in their name by the state, INGOs, NGOs and CBOs. Finally, there are issues relating to ensuringthat this rehabilitation work is being carried out with sensitivity to human rights, in a participatory,
equitable, non-discriminatory, transparent and accountable manner by all persons.
There is considerable and innovative work being done by several human rights organizations on
many of the issues raised above. However, there is still a tremendous need and tremendous
potential for strengthening human rights in relation to tsunami recovery in the country in thefollowing realms:-

To ensure, protect and advance the human rights of the tsunami-affected throughout therecovery phase-

To ensure, protect and advance the human rights of the most vulnerable within the affected
populations, e.g. women, children, disabled, conflict-affected etc.

-

To respond to, investigate and redress the human rights concerns and complaints of thetsunami-affected in a systematic and timely manner.

-

To further develop the capacities of recovery stakeholders (public, civil and private sectors)
to carryout their work in more rights-friendly and rights-based ways.

-

To further develop the capacities of the affected people to play a more meaningful role intheir own recovery.

241

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Objectives:-

Capacities of the duty-bearers (in this instance, recovery actors in public, civil and private
sectors) to advance human rights and to adopt rights-based approaches in their recovery
work developed-

Capacities of the claim-holders (in this case, those persons affected by the tsunami) toensure, protect and advance their rights in the recovery process developed

Time Frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) Short Term
Geographical area of implementation:
The Tsunami-affected Districts
Activities:-

Human Rights Help-Desks in Tsunami-affected districts
Capacity Development of Duty-Bearers
Capacity Development of Claim-Holders (Recovery Watch)

Output:Effective mechanism for addressing grievances and sharing information in place and fully
functional
Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 50 mi (USD 0.5 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 50 mi (USD 0.5 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required-- Local / International Funding
Contact person in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR - Secretary
Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights, Human Rights Commission and RADA

242

Chapter 8
Public Awareness, Education and Training

8.1

Key Issues

An important aspect of any disaster risk management programme is to anticipate the requirements fordisaster related public awareness, education and training. The planning process will only be effective if
those who are the ultimate beneficiaries know how to mitigate disasters, respond in times of disasters anddevelop capacities to cope in their aftermath. For this reason, an essential part of a disaster risk
managementplanis theeducationof thosewho may bethreatened by potentialdisasterevents.
At present, many government organisations, NGOs and CBOs conduct DRM related training.
Efforts are often duplicated and training is conducted without appropriate resources (in terms of
training materials and tools). Moreover, there is no apparent coordination with regard to therelevance of training and consistency of content.
There is no proper needs analysis and systematic target audience segmentation, and hence nocustomised training to bring out relevant learning outcomes amongst people who serve in different
capacities. There is currently no capacity enhancement initiative for DRM trainers locally and ageneral lack of coordinated allocation of available regional training opportunities for sustaining
the capacity enhancement of trainers.

8.2

Strategy

Probable solutions in the short-medium term are as follows:i.
There is a need to formulate a policy which brings together all DRM trainings under thesupervisory role of the DMC and creates a corresponding need for MOUs with partnerorganisations to implement training.
ii.

A mechanism for quality assurance of DRM training can be ensured and the evaluation ofeffectiveness made mandatory as an institutional endeavour to be achieved by partners
undertaking this activity for the sector.
243

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aiii.

Development of partnerships with regional institutions and universities to upgrade thetraining material and for development of a cadre of trainers on different subjects will be
useful as a quick solution. Participation of local professionals in regional training events
conducted by such institutions as well as having a program for institutionalization of someof the regional training courses at national level with suitable modifications will be an
appropriate strategy.

iv.

The manuals and guidelines developed under technical subject areas such as constructionin hazard prone areas, land use planning etc can serve as training and awareness material.
Developing a culture for web based information sharing can address some of the otherneeds which cannot be met through the traditional capacity building programs.

Establishment of the 'National Disaster Safety Day' annual commemorations as a high level
event in the annual government calendar is one of the approaches that can bring about acoordinated and effective public awareness campaign. It can be an annual event organised by
the DM ministry and all stakeholders including school children and community members canactively participate in such an event. In establishing an integrated educational training
programme, it should be recognised that education is often a two-way process in the field of
disaster preparedness. The main programmes identified under the theme of public awareness,training and education are:i.

Promote Public Awareness at National Level
This can be done through effective implementation of a National Public Awareness
Programme for disaster preparedness.

ii.

Promote Awareness among School Children
This can be achieved through the introduction of DM related subjects in the school
curriculum, and through awareness and resource materials in all 3 languages .

iii.

Promote Awareness and Train University Graduates through Integration of
DRR in University Curriculum
The integration of DM subjects at university level in disciplines such as urban planning,
civil engineering, architecture would help promote awareness. Integration of DM subjects
at university level inthese disciplines has already been implemented in some universities.
In Ruhuna University DM subjects have been integrated in the Geography Department.
In other departments of all other universities too, this must be promoted.

iv.

Increased Awareness of DM Related Subjects among School Children
DM would not be a new subject area in the curriculum. The content will be integrated into
existing subjects instead. The integration of DM in the Geography Syllabus in 2004 as a
joint venture between National Institute of Education (NIE) and Sri Lanka Urban

244

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Multi-hazard Disaster Mitigation Project (SLUMDMP) may need re-visiting. NBRO hasdeveloped a series of books to introduce landslide related issues to school children which
can be used as additional reading material/ activity series for different grades.
v.

Promote Awareness among Professional Groups, Key Decision Makers
through Training and Short Courses
This would involve training on disaster preparedness and reduction in entry level, refresher
and in-service training of government employees at various levels.

vi.

Increase Capacity among Key Institutions through Training of Officials and Training
Aids/Tools

vii.

Integrate DM Training Curriculum in Continuing Education
DM has to be integrated into development initiatives. Professionals who are involved inplanning, implementation, financial management etc. need to understand the implicationsof DM to sustain development efforts.

viii

A National Event under the Patronage of the President and Council Members of the NCDM
to Launch Countrywide Awareness Programmes
In other countries in the region a National Disaster Safety Day has been declared by thegovernments as an effective way of creating awareness with the participation of the generalix.

public and school children. Various activities can be implemented in such an event. andevents carried out as awareness programmes.
Nationwide Awareness Campaign on Public Safety

8.3

Project Proposals

The following are the main projects identified under the theme of public awareness, training andeducation to be implemented over the next 10 years:
PA-1
Awareness through Disaster Safety Day
PA-2
National PublicAwareness Programme
PA-3
Awareness through schools and school children
PA-3.1 Integration of DRM into school curriculum
PA-3.2 School children awareness program
PA-4
Awareness through University Curriculum and Continuing Education
PA-4.1 Integration of DM in graduate and post-graduate curriculum in university
education
PA-4.2 Awareness by integrating DM training in continuing education
PA-5
Training for Government Employees
PA-6
Training for Emergency Preparedness and Response
PA-7
Enhancing Training Capacities
PA-8
SpecialAwareness Programmes
PA-9
NationwideAwareness Campaign on Public Safety245

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PA-1

i n

S r i L a n k a

Awareness through Disaster Safety Day (26 Dec)

Agencies involved:
DMC, MoE, DM line agencies, Provincial and District Administration, Police and Armed Forces,
Fire Brigade, ITN, and other television media, SLBC, print media, SLRCS and NGOs in DM

Background and rationale:
A National Disaster Safety Day event is an effective way of creating awareness with theparticipation of the general public and school children. Street / stage drama, processions, public
meetings, seminars, awards and other various techniques can be used during such an event.
SLUMDMP in collaboration with Ratnapura Municipal Council and Sabaragamuwa Provincial
Council organised Disaster Safety Day programmes on three occasions during its project period tocreate public awareness. Although a recommendation was proposed to declare a National Disaster
Safety Day it was not successful as DRM did not have a legal backing at the time.
It is noteworthy to mention that in some countries of the region a National Disaster Safety Day has
been declared and events are organised throughout a week or a fortnight starting from the National
Disaster Safety Day. In Nepal for instance the National Disaster Safety Day falls on 15th January of
every year in memory of the people killed in a major earthquake in 1934. In Bangladesh, theNational Disaster Safety Day is celebrated on 31st March every year.
It is proposed to initiate this national event under the patronage of HE the President and council
members of the National Council for Disaster Management (NCDM) to launch countrywide
awareness after declaring the National Disaster Safety Day. A suitable day may be 26th December
every year in memory of the people killed in the devastating Tsunami. It is also proposed to solicit
participation of stakeholders and to appreciate inputs through national awards.

Objective:
To create awareness and emphasise importance of disaster preparedness; Nationwide awareness of
the importance of disaster management through a National Disaster Safety Day

Time frame:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)
Annual event starting 2006. Date to be finalized.
246

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
Initially in the capital, Colombo, and may be rotated among other cities.

Activities:
Year 1 - 2 (2006 - 2007)
a. Issuing of a gazette notification on establishment of “National Disaster Safety Day”
b. Establish a National Committee for the event convened by the DMC
c. Implement a National Award Scheme for disaster management initiatives and bestpractices at various levels (such as school competitions, institutional initiatives for
preparedness, mitigation and response
d. Evaluate year round activities for national awards
e. Organization of the national disaster safety day to create awareness under the patronage ofHE the President and NCDM
f. Carry out evaluations through independent personnel(2008 - 2010)
Year 3 - 5
Annual event as above
Year 6 - 10 (2011 - 2015)
Annual event as above

Output::“National Disaster Safety Day” annual commemorations established as a high level eventin the government calendar
National awards to catalyze DM activities

Budget:Year 1 - (2006)
Year 2-10 - (2007-2015)
Total budget- SLR 3.0 million (USD 0.03 mi)- SLR 18.0 million (USD 0.18 mi)- SLR 21 million (USD 0.21mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 /73
Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
National Committee for National Disaster Day
247

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PA-2

i n

S r i L a n k a

National Public Awareness Program

Agencies involved:
DMC, DM line agencies, Provincial and District Administration, MoE, Media Channels, NSF,
NGOs, Samurdhi Network, Private Sector, SLRCS

Background and rationale:
An informed public is better prepared to adapt and respond to danger. A well-planned public
education programme can make the disaster warning process more effective. SLUMDMP carriedout public awareness programmes in its demonstration city districts and provinces. National
Disaster Management Centre of the then Ministry of Women's Empowerment ad Social Welfare
conducted awareness programmes throughout the country for SLAS officers (District / Divisional
Secretaries, Social Services Officers, Grama Niladharis etc.) and the general public. In this context
it is proposed to initiate a well organized public awareness programme.

Objectives:
To effective implement a National Public Awareness Program to build a culture of safety fromdisasters focused on a multi hazard scenario:

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term
Year 6-10 (2011-2015) - Long term

Geographical area of implementation:
Nation-wide campaign; hazard-specific community-based campaigns in disaster-prone areas

Activities:
Year 1 - 2 (2006 - 2007)
a. Carry out appropriate and relevant awareness to targeted disaster-prone communities
b. Create awareness among general public on importance of preparedness and mitigationc. Facilitate the disaster warning process to be more effective.
d. Help the public and all stake holders to understand better the basic, practical measures forprevention, mitigation, and preparedness and to do the right thing when disasters strike.
e. Serve to dissipate some of the traditional fatalism about natural calamities.
248

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k af. Instill the willingness to live with the likelihood of disasters in communities
g. Implement campaign(s)h. Carry out evaluations through selected independent personnel
Year 3 - 5 (2008 - 2010)
i. Implement campaign(s)j. Evaluate campaign and identify future needs, formulate follow up campaign
Year 6 - 10 (2008 - 2010)
k. Implement follow up campaign
l. Evaluate campaign and identify future needs

Outputs:
Situation analysis and need analysis reports
Audience segmentation
Campaign programmes with details of implementation
Campaign material, posters, video material, audio material, , print based material etc
implementation schedules.
Evaluation reports

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)- SLR 50 million (USD 0.50 mi)- SLR 45 million (USD 0.45 mi)- SLR 50 million (USD 0.50 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 145 million (USD 1.45 mi)

Funding status:
Departmental budget required; Donor and collaborator funding to be sought for campaign design
and implementation

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 /73 Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com

249

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PA-3.1i n

S r i L a n k a

Integration of DRM into School Curriculum

Agencies involved:
NIE, MoE, DMC, GTZ,ADPC,ADRC

Background and rationale:
Disaster Risk Management would not be a separate subject area in the curriculum. Instead thecontent will be integrated into existing subjects as relevant. For example, integration will be into
subjects such as Geography, Environment, History, Science etc. It can be in subjects such as evenlanguages (e.g., essay topics, poetry), drama etc. The DM curriculum integrated to Geography
Syllabus in 2004 as a joint venture between NIE and SLUMDMP may need re-visiting here. Under
this project another activity was including Disaster Management as a topic for developing projects
and assignments by students at GCE(AL), under which the AL teachers were provided initialtraining. This was in collaboration with the NIE and was introduced around 5 years back. Refresher
teacher training will be required which needs to be a regular activity. These will lead to increased
awareness of DM related subjects among school children and this will help create generation ofknowledge about DRM and preparedness among children in the future generations too. This isespecially vital with regard to very infrequent but very destructive hazards such as tsunami or
major dam related hazards.

Objectives:
To assist and continue the ongoing integration of DM content into school curriculum withall related activities including teacher training

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) -Short term
Year 3-5 (2008-2010) - Medium term
Year 6-10 (2011-2015) - Long term
The chronology of content integration will merge with NIE time frame of curriculum
revision. Similarly the process of printing school material will adhere to current NIE
practice.

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country250

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Carry out following activities in a phased out manner as appropriate to suit the NIE programmea. Through NIE and Ministry of Education to integrate Disaster Management content into
existing subjects as relevant.
b. In the process review Disaster Management curriculum integrated to the Geography
Syllabus in 2004 by NIE and SLUMDMP
c. Develop school curriculum for Disaster Management and its implementationd. Collate print and video materials available with UN, USAID, GTZ, ISDR, FEMA, ADRC,ADPC and other disaster management institutes and screen for suitability of use within
schools.
e. Continue the activity where DM was included as a topic for developing projects andassignments by students at GCE(AL)f. Training of Teachers for DM teaching subjects where curriculum is integrated and for
GCE(AL) projects and assignments
g. Carry out evaluations after implementing different phases of activities

Outputs:
School text books on different subjects with disaster management content integrated and
DRM included in school teaching curriculum
Teacher training manuals
Supplementary material for class rooms

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)
Total Budget- SLR 21 million (USD 0.21 mi)- SLR 05 million (USD 0.05 mi)- SLR 50 million (USD 0.50 mi)- SLR 76 million (USD 0.76 mi)

Funding status:
On-going activities covered by GTZ.Additional funding required.

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
LeadAgencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Director General, NIE ; GTZ
251

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PA-3.2i n

S r i L a n k a

School Children Awareness Programme

Agencies involved:
Disaster Management Centre, National Science Foundation (NSF), NIE, MoE, Dept. ofProbation & Child Care, UNICEF, Save the Children, SLRCS, other partner agencies

Background and rationale:
SLUMDMP has already carried out a pilot project in community animation through school
children which has clearly established the potential for such work. Under this activity 15 schools
were selected where school societies were formed and children were encouraged to carryout
various activities related to disasters prevalent in the surrounding areas.Activities included rain fallmonitoring with rain gauges, information gathering related to landslide or flood disasters which
had taken place earlier, etc. which increases awareness as well as sharpen their knowledge about
DRM.
The National Disaster Management Centre of the then Ministry of Women's Empowerment andSocial Welfare also conducted school awareness programmes in selected schools of the country
and conducted essay and art competitions.
The initiatives could be replicated in other severely prone areas initially and subsequently in otherareas making them mandatory in collaboration with the MoE. These could be enriched withawareness material in print, video and multimedia. These can be supplemented with half-day
awareness programmes focusing on preparedness for possible disasters in the area, community
based mitigation, and other selected titles decided upon by the DMC, MoE and NIE. District-wiseor all-island Essay and Art competitions, Drama competitions, debates are other possible activities
under organised campaigns.
One major activity under this initiative is development of School Emergency Response Plan. The
higher grade children can be involved in the development of School Emergency Response Plans
based on guidelines provided by DMC and under supervision of the staff. Training on these has tobe provided to staff. DM can be an extra curricular activity in schools through Scout and Girl Guide
movements for training on Medical First responders and SAR parties.
These will lead to increased awareness of disaster management related issues among school
children and this will help create generation of knowledge about DRM and preparedness in the
future generations too. With regard to infrequent but very destructive hazards such as tsunami or
major dam related hazards etc, this is especially vital.
252

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Objectives:
To create awareness in the younger generation and to achieve community animation
through school children
To introduce school risk management clubs for activities by children related to DRM
To develop School Emergency Response Plans making them mandatory

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-10 (2006-2015) - Short, Medium and Long term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:
Year 1 - 2 (2006- 2007)
a. Community animation through school children (eg: SLUMDMP).
b. Propose school risk management clubs/ societies and activities under extra curriculum
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.

activities.
School based community outreach through school societies
Production of pamphlets, posters, brochures
Production of appropriate videos for awareness and instruction
Conducting training courses, seminars, workshops for school children and teachers
Introduce development of School Emergency Response Plan in phase I as demonstration
activities in selected schools

Year 3 - 5 (2008- 2010)h. Interactive CDs
i. Conducting training courses, seminars, workshops for school children and teachers
j. Introduce development of School Emergency Response Plan; Replicate demonstration
activities of phase I in other selected schools
Year 6- 10 (2011- 2015)
k. Interactive CDs
l. Conducting training courses, seminars, workshops for school children andteachers
m. Introduce development of School Emergency Response Plan; Replicate demonstration
activities of phase I and II in all schools making it mandatory253

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Outputs:
School societies established and made sustainable
Ageneration of young community animators for disaster reduction in place
Good practices documented on video and print;Awareness material
School awareness campaign details for regular implementation with improvements
Guidelines for School Emergency Response Plans
School Emergency Response Plans

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)
Total Budget- SLR 5 million (USD 0.05 mi)- SLR 20 million (USD 0.20 mi)- SLR 30 million (USD 0.30 mi)- SLR 55 million (USD 0.55 mi)

Funding status:
Local funding required from DMC budget, from NSF and;Additional International funding required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Chairperson, NSF

254

R o a dPA-4.1

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Integration of DM in Graduate and Post-Graduate
Curriculum in University Education

Agencies involved:
DMC, UGC, Universities

Background
After integrating DM content into the school curriculum it is in mandatory to provide
opportunity to continue it in tertiary education. Under the SLUMDMP initiatives Faculty ofArchitecture of University of Moratuwa has already integrated the subject initially into its post
graduate courses followed by the degree courses in Town Planning, Architecture and Building
Economics. University of Ruhuna has also completed the integration in the Department ofGeography, in general and special degree courses in Geography. University of Peradeniya has
already commenced a post graduate Masters course in DM. There must be support to theseendeavours in terms of providing expertise and other resources for their sustainability.
At the same time integration has to be promoted in other departments of all universities. This
could be taken up in a phased manner also incorporating lessons learned in the above
mentioned integrations. The integration must be followed up by promoting the degree and PG
students in selecting DRM related projects and assignments in their course works and final
theses. In the Faculty of Architecture of University of Moratuwa this is already taking place.
In addition, universities must be encouraged to take up research work in this subject area by
associating them in activities of DMC and partner agencies.

Objectives:
To integrate disaster risk management in university education of various disciplines incourses which have not been taken up so far in a phased out manner
To promote degree and PG students in selecting DRM related projects and assignments intheir course works and final theses
To organize short courses for university staff, undergraduate / post graduate students
To provide resource inputs for all above courses
To provide training in local / regional programmes of institutions such as ADPC and ADRC
for selected staff members of selected universities under each phase

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 10 (2006-2015) - Short, Medium and Long term255

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:
Year 1 - 2 (2006- 2007)
a. Discussion with the UGC and university authorities on integration of DRM subjects inexisting under-graduate level courses.
b. Initiate integration in universities / departments who have already shown willingness toshare materials and modules from other departments which have already completed
integrationc. Provide resource inputs
d. Provide training for selected staff members
Year 3 - 5 (2008- 2010)
e. Initiate integration in other universities / departments
f. Continue training for other staff members
g. Development of short courses or integration of course material in existing courses
h. Provide resource inputs.
Year 6- 10 (2011- 2015)
i. Initiate integration in other universities / departments that were not covered underPhases I or II
j. Continue training for other staff members
k. Continue short courses
l. Post graduate / post doctoral studies for capacity building in Disaster Preparedness, GIS in
disaster zones, Seismology, Modeling, Oceanography, Marine biology, Coastal
engineering, and other health related issues

Outputs:
Disaster management curricula and study material available for different departments /universities
Curricula and materials for short courses available
Selected staff trained in local and regional programmes

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)
Total Budget256- SLR 15 million (USD 0.15 mi)- SLR 15 million (USD 0.15 mi)- SLR 20 million (USD 0.20 mi)- SLR 50 million (USD 0.50 mi)R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Funding status:International funding required for experts and resources

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre;
UGC, Universities, NISD

257

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PA-4.2i n

S r i L a n k a

Awareness by Integrating DM Training inContinuing Education

Agencies involved:
DMC, SLIDA, CHPB, SLILG

Background and rationale:
DM has to be integrated into development initiatives. Professionals who are involved in planning,
implementation, financial management etc. need to understand implications of DM to sustain
development efforts.
CHPB has already commenced natural disaster mitigation training for technical categories of
personnel under the SLUMDMP project activities. These were organised as short courses (varying
from 2 to 7 days). Participants from professions such as town planning, architecture, engineering,and finance have participated in these programmes. SLIDA had been selected as the training
agency for administrative and finance category of staff and conducting training on annual basis.
CHPB also integrate DRM in its other course such as Construction Management and custom
designed courses for various agencies (RDA, NHDA)
It is suggested to review earlier training materials and develop courses with curricula and materials
and organize a training programme utilizing these agencies with monitoring by the DMC.

Objectives:
To create awareness on DRM issues in professional groups

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1- 5 (2006-2010) - Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
District, Provincial, and National level focus

Activities:
Year 1 - 2 (2006- 2007)
a. Discussion with the authorities from relevant agencies
b. Carry out a need and relevancy analysis for different professional groupsc. Review training curricula and materials of courses already conducted by various agencies
258

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k ad. Develop short training courses, training of trainers
e. Conduct training courses on pilot basis
f. Evaluate the courses and review and revise curricula / materials
Year 3 - 5 (2008- 2010)
g. Continue short training courses
h. Integration of course material in existing courses of different training agencies. Provide
resource inputs.
i. Evaluation, modifications and ensuring sustainability

Outputs:
Needs analysis reports
Training modules
Implementation schedules
Numbers of professionals trained
Evaluation reports

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007)
Year 3-5 (2008-2010)- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 20 million (USD 0.20 mi)

Funding status:International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC: Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Professional training institutes - SLIDA, CHPB, SLILG259

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PA-5

i n

S r i L a n k aTraining of Government Employees

Agencies involved:
DMC with National Training Partners- CHPB, SLIDA, SLILG, National Institute of Social
Development (NISD) etc., Service Training Institutes of various Ministries, MDTUs, NGOs,SLRCS, Management Development & Training Centres (MDTC) of PCs, MCs, Fire Brigade,
Police andArmed Forces

Background and rationale
Institutional preparedness and response planning to be in place. CHPB has already commenced
natural disaster mitigation training for technical categories of personnel under the SLUMDMP
project activities. SLIDA had been selected as the training agency for administrative category ofstaff and conducting training on annual basis. NDMC formerly under the Ministry of Social
Services and Social Welfare also conducted training for administrative officers. Resource personsof these agencies were given training as trainers for these programmes. Under the DMC
programme SLILG, National Institute of Social Development (NISD), Provincial Councils
Training Units have been identified as training institutes for DRM training for different personnel.
It is suggested to review earlier training materials and develop courses with curricula and materials
and organize a training programme utilizing these agencies with monitoring by the DMC.

Objectives:
To create awareness on DRM issues among government employees

Time frame of implementation:
2006-2010: Short and Medium term: 5 years

Geographical area of implementation:
District, Provincial, and National level focus

Activities:
Year 1 - 2 (2006- 2007)
a. Discussion with the authorities from relevant agencies
b. Carry out a need analysis and relevancy for different professional groupsc. Review training curricula and materials of courses already conducted by various agencies
260

R o a d

d.
e.
f.
g.
h.

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Add modules in in-service training of all government officials.
Develop short training courses, training of trainers
Conduct training courses on pilot basis
Evaluate the courses and review and revise curricula / materials
Develop partnership with Regional DM institutions and adapt material in local context

Year 3 - 5 (2008- 2010)
i. Develop new training modules to meet additional demands.
j. Continue short training courses from Phase I
k. Integration of DRM in existing courses of different training agencies. Provide resource
inputs.
l. Evaluation, modifications and ensuring sustainability

Outputs:
Training on disaster preparedness, mitigation and response at entry level, refresher and inservice training of government employees at various levels
Training modules
Implementation schedules, trained numbers of professionals

Budget:Year 3-5 (2008-2010)
Year 6-10 (2011-2015)- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)- SLR 10 million (USD 0.10 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 20 million (USD 0.20 mi)

Funding status:International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC: Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Professional training institutes - SLIDA, CHPB, SLILG
Other partners, line agencies

261

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PA-6

i n

S r i L a n k aTraining for Emergency Preparedness and Response

Agencies involved:
DMC, MoDM, Donor Agencies, UN Agencies and programmes such as APELL, NWSDB,
Provincial Health Departments

Background and rationale:
The recent disasters have made it very clear that the country must have good emergency
preparedness and response systems in place to respond when disasters strike. In the aftermath of
the 2003 landslide and flood disaster District Disaster Preparedness and Response Plans weredeveloped with the intervention of the UNDP with the Minsitry of Women's Empowerment andSocial Welfare. Presently such plans are being developed in other districts and divisions as well.
These plans require personnel with different skills and also various response groups who havebeen identified have to be given training.
While in some areas training can be provided utilizing the resources available with selected NGOs
for some areas of activities no capacity is available to impart training. For example, in some MCs
even when they have the fire fighting machines they do not have trained operators or trained
firemen for fire fighting.
Therefore, institutional capacity must be developed to sustain preparedness and response to be inplace as required.

Objectives:
Institutional Capacity Enhancement for preparedness and response by
Establishing a multi-disciplinary fire & rescue training centre
Training officials in emergency preparedness and response

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country262

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Activities:
Year 1 - 2 (2006- 2007)
a. Establishing national training center for emergency responseb. Training courses for operational staff including fire brigades outside Colomboc. Training of public/ private sector organizations and Volunteer Emergency -Response
Teams

Outputs:
Needs analysis reports, Training modules available
National Training Centre established Training systems for Emergency Preparedness andResponse established

Budget:Year 1 - 2 (2006- 2007)- SLR 70 million (USD 0.70 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 70 million (USD 0.70 mi)

Funding status:International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre263

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PA-7

i n

S r i L a n k aEnhancing Training Capacities

Agencies involved:
DMC,MoDM,DonorAgencies, Regionaland internationaltraining and capacity building institutions

Background and rationale:
Various agencies such as SLIDA, CHPB, NBRO, and NDMC have conducted training related to
DRM in the past eight years or so. However the quality of training is not very consistent. Therefore
these agencies needs enhancement of capacities by way of enhancing resources and skills of trainers.
ADPC has developed with national agencies such as SLIDA, CHPB, NBRO, and NDMC, various
training courses under Asian Urban Disaster Mitigation Programme (AUDMP) such as Natural
Disaster Mitigation (NDM), Community Based Disaster Risk management (CBDRM), courses onConstruction in Disaster ProneAreas, courses on Land use Planning in Disaster prone areas.
Also currently ADPC is in discussions with SLILG to conduct training related to Urban
Governance and DRM. In the past several medical doctors and health sector professionals haveattended courses related to public health and emergencies. However all such training courses areusually limited to project based activities and need to be institutionalised as national courses.
ADPC could help the selected training agencies in enhancement of capacities by way of provisionof resource inputs, training curriculum development and enhancement of skills of trainers.

Objectives:
To increase capacity of faculty members to obtain knowledge on the state of the art technology andskills related to DRM subject and to enhance resources for training

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - Short term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities:
Year 1 - 2 (2006- 2007)
a. Discussion with International Training and capacity building institutions for more training
opportunities.
264

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k ab. Develop partnership arrangement with Regional Institutions regularly used to conduct DM
training courses at regional level.
c. Conduct needs assessments
d. Develop a fellowship scheme for developing a competent cadre of trainers.
e. Regular TOT programs at regional and national level
f. Enhance resources for training by improving the curriculum of existing courses anddeveloping new courses.
g. Increase the capacity of faculty members through knowledge enhancement on the state of
the art technology and skills related to DRM subject

Outputs:
Training capacities of existing training organizations enhanced

Budget:Year 1 - 2 (2006- 2007)- SLR 200 million (USD 2.0 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 200 million (USD 2.0 mi)

Funding status:International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre265

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PA-8

i n

S r i L a n k aSpecial Awareness Programmes

Agencies involved:
DMC, DonorAgencies, Regional and international training and capacity building institutions

Background and rationale:
Even though Sri Lanka has faced various disastrous situations in the past, the December 2004
Tsunami has made it very clear that the country is also prone to infrequent, potential highconsequence events. At any given point of time the country could face an event such as forest fires,
oil spills including inland and marine oil spills, radiological emergencies, nuclear disasters, air andmaritime hazards, pandemics, epidemics etc.
Therefore special awareness programmes must be conducted to make relevant segments of
population ready to respond to them.

Objectives:
To gather and collate information on various aspects of infrequent potential highconsequence events and their avoidance
To increase awareness on infrequent, potential high consequence events

Time frame of implementation:
Year 3-8 (2008-2012) - Medium and Long term

Geographical area of implementation:
The Entire Country

Activities
Medium and long term activities to include:a. Constitute a specialist group to obtain information on various aspects of avoidance ofinfrequent potential high consequence events
b. Develop guidelines for transportation, storage, handling of sources (chemicals, gas,
explosives, radio-active elements, etc)
c. Create public awarenessd. Develop module on industrial safety to be used in various training and capacity building
programs.
266

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k a

Outputs:
Special awareness programs developed on infrequent potential high consequence events (such as
forest fires, oil spills including inland and marine oil spills, radiological emergencies, nuclear
disasters, air and maritime hazards, pandemics, epidemics etc)

Budget:Year 1-5 (2011-2015)- SLR 15 million (USD 0.15 mi)

Total Budget- SLR 15 million (USD 0.15 mi)

Funding status:International Funding Required

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
DMC - Director General, Disaster Management Centre267

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

PA-9

i n

S r i L a n k a

Nationwide Awareness Campaign on Public Safety

Agencies involved:
DMC, with guidance from Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights

Background and rationale:
Globally the incidents of terrorism are becoming more and more frequent, and many countries aretaking the issue very seriously and creating awareness among their public on precautions to betaken. In Sri Lanka, the people have been living with three decades of conflict, and numerous
instances when their safety is put at risk.
It is essential that a concerted and nationwide awareness campaign is carried out which will
educate the vulnerable population on the safety precautions that need to be taken- such as avoiding
suspicious objects, or unclaimed luggage and reporting to the nearest authority. Similarly, thecampaign could also address the issue where sections of the public are incited against each other,and tackle the issue without resorting to violence.

Objectives:
To enhance awareness among the people of Sri Lanka on safety measures and precautions to beobserved to protect lives and property.

Time frame of implementation:
Year 1-5 (2006-2010) Short and Medium term

Geographical area of implementation:
The entire country

Activities:
a. Develop a nationwide public awareness campaign to enhance public safety(do's and don'ts) through a consultative process
b. Carry out pilot tests in select districts and improve the design of the campaign; develop
awareness materials- brochures, flyers, banners, billboards, hoardings, radio andtelevision clips as appropriatec. Involve various stakeholders- government, private sector and civil society in crrying out
the awareness campaign
268

Outputs:- Nationwide PublicAwareness campaign on public safety- Awareness materials

Budget:Year 1-2 (2006-2007) - SLR 100 mi (USD 1.0 mi)
Year 3-5 (2006-2007) - SLR 200 mi (USD 2.0 mi)
Total Budget- SLR 300 mi (USD 3.0 mi)

Funding status:
New Funding Required - Local / International Funding

Contact persons in lead and participating agencies:
M/DM&HR- Secretary
DMC
Director General, Disaster Management Centre
Tel: 011-2441570 / 73 Fax: 011-2441571
Email: dmcsl@sltnet.lk
dgdmcsl@gmail.com
Other partner agencies:
Police,Armed Forces, Ministry of Public Security, Law and Order, Civil Society, Private Sector269

R o a d

270

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

S r i L a n k aChapter 9
Implementation Arrangements for the Road Map

9.1

Introduction

The success of the Road Map for DRM in Sri Lanka will depend on the adoption of effective
arrangements for implementation and monitoring. With the technical support of the DMC, the
M/DM&HR will take the overall responsibility for the implementation of the Road Map. The
relevant line ministries, departments and agencies, the provincial authorities, the United Nations
system, the other international organisations, the SLRC, civil society and the private sector will
support the implementation of the Road Map in accordance with their specific mandate and area ofspecialisation.

9.2

ImplementationArrangements

The Road Map will be rooted in and adhere to the principles of good governance. Key elements of
the implementation arrangements include the following:
9.2.1

National Steering Committee

An oversight mechanism in Colombo in the form of a Steering Committee will provide strategic
guidance and advice to oversee and monitor results, and to ensure that lessons are captured. The
committee will meet once in two months. Committee members will include representatives fromline ministries, provincial government, the UNDP, the SLRCS, the private sector and civil society.
9.2.2

TechnicalAdvisory Committee

The Technical Advisory Committee will include the Government (central and provincial) andrepresentatives from academia and national research institutes. The Committee will have expertson all the seven thematic areas covered in the Road Map and will provide technical inputs to the
DMC for the implementation of the Road Map.
271

R o a d

M a p

f o r

D R M

i n

9.2.3

Implementing Bodies

S r i L a n k a

Implementation of the Road Map, which covers a wide range of activities related to DRM will
require flexibility and partnerships with a range of national and international institutions.
Emphasis will be placed on implementation structures with key partners taking responsibility forthe ultimate success of the Road Map. For each of the seven thematic areas in the Road Map a leadagency will be identified. The DMC on behalf of M/DM& HR will provide the overall coordinationand information management support. Emphasis will be on achieving timely and efficient
implementation combined with capacity development at all levels to sustain DRM efforts in the
country over a longer term.
9.2.4

Financial Management

The Road Map's financial resources will be managed through a series of controls at various levels.
All financial transactions will be monitored, recorded, analysed and reported through transparent
financial systems. UN-assisted projects will be subject to annual audits, normally done by theGovernment's finance and development agency or in some cases the finance audit agency.
Implementing agencies can engage with third party organisations and institutes to monitor aid
effectiveness, and to generate information on how funds channelled by them are translating into
impacts for affected populations and local institutions on the ground. This information will feed
into the Road Map's development and refinement, and will complement the monitoring system.
The External Resources Division of the Ministry of Finance will coordinate and manageinternational funds received in support of the Road Map. Analysis of assistance provided todifferent thematic and geographical areas will be produced from time to time as required. This will
ensure greater donor alignment and harmonisation with the priorities identified in the Road Map.

9.3

Monitoring and Evaluation

A monitoring and evaluation mechanism will ensure effective multi-stakeholder monitoring ofactivities supported under the Road Map. It will also foster accountability and transparency in theuse of Road Map resources. Monitoring activities will include on-site surveillance, regular
reporting, and financial expenditure tracking. Results indicators will be developed jointly by Road
Map partners. The overall progress of the Road Map activities will be regularly reviewed by the
National Steering Committee and reported by the MoDM to NCDM. In addition, teams of national
and international United Nations Volunteers (UNVs) will support the DMC in effective monitoringat the District and Division levels.
Implementation of the Road Map will entail the regular collection and processing of information
and analysis on key outputs. The DMC website will post the Road Map document, related
programme documents, progress reports and briefs on best practices. The website will be regularly
updated and linked with the websites of partner agencies. ICT and printed materials will be
prepared for different target groups (e.g. government, the public, practitioners, experts and donors)
on lessons learned and other aspects of Road Map implementation.
272

Annex 1

Gazette Notification of
Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Righ

273

274

The Gazette of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
EXTRAORDINARY
No. 1433/11 – MONDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2006

(Published by Authority)

PART I : SECTION (I) — GENERAL
Government Notifications
NOTIFICATION
IT is hereby notified that the notification issued by me in the exercise of powers vested in me under paragraph (1) (a) of Article
44 of the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, and publised inGazette Extraordinary No. 1422/22 of
08.12.2005 and amended from time to time is further amended with effect from the date of this Notification in the maner set out
below :
MAHINDA R AJAPAKSA ,President.
Presidential Secretariat,
Colombo 01,
20th February, 2006.

(a) by the substitution in the Notification of the Heading “Minister of Disaster Management” and all the items under
the said heading for the following Heading and the items in Column I and Column II hereto :Minister of Disaster Management and Human Rights

Column I
Departments/Institutions

Column II
Subjects and Functions

National Disaster Management Council

Formulation and Implementation of policies, programmes
and Projects for disaster mitigation, response andrecoveryDisaster Management Centre

Formulation of National Disaster Management Plan and
the National Emergency Operation Plan based on thenational policy

Department of Meteorology

Administration and operation of Sri Lanka Disaster
Management Act, No. 13 of 2005.
Initiate and coordinate foreign aided projects for disastermitigation, response and recovery
Liaising with Ministries, Government authorities and agencies, private sector agencies, NGOs and INGOs and allother relevant agencies to ensure timely execution of such
responsibility275

Coordination and Management of relief activities
pertaining to natural and man-made disasters
Coordinating awarness programs on natural disasters andman-made disasters
Early warning systems
Supervision of the activities of non-governmentalorganizations and social welfare voluntary agencies inrelation to disaster management, provisions of relief andpromotion of human rights,
Facilitation of and assistance to non-governmentalorganizations and social welfare voluntary agencies, in thefields of disaster management and human rights.
Promotion of Human Rights
Coordination with UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights and Other international and Regional Human Rights
Bodies
Meteorological Surveys and Research(b) By the deletion of the words “Department of Meteorology” appearing in Column I and “Meteorology Surveys
and Research” appearing in Column II under the Heading “Minister of Science and Technology” in the said
Notification.
04-401/2

276

Annex 2

Sri Lanka Disaster Management Act No.13 of 2005

277

278

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC
SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF
SRI LANKA—————————SRI LANKA DISASTER MANAGEMENT
ACT, No. 13 OF 2005—————————[Certified on 13th May, 2005]

Printed on the Order of Government—————————

Published as a Supplement to Part II of the Gazette of the Democratic
Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka of May 13, 2005
PRINTED AT THE DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT PRINTING, SRI LANKA
TO BE PURCHASED AT THE GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS BUREAU, COLOMBO 1

279

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005

1

[Certified on13th May, 2005]
L. D. —O. 56/90.
AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL
FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT; THE DISASTER MANAGEMENTCENTRE; THE APPOINTMENT OF TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES;
THE PREPARATION OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLANS; THE
DECLARATION OF A STATE OF DISASTER; THE AWARD OF COMPENSATION
AND FOR MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH OR INCIDENTAL THERETO.
WHEREAS human life, property and the environment of
Sri Lanka is being threatened and endangered due to certain
disasters taking place within the territory of Sri Lanka:

Preamble.

AND WHEREAS it has become necessary to protect humanlife and property of the people and the environment of Sri
Lanka from the consequence of these disasters, by effectively
dealing with them from a national perspective by the
preparation of a national policy and a plan and by theappointment of centrally co-ordinated committees andinstitutions to give effect to such policy and plan :NOW THEREFORE be it enacted by the Parliament of the
Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka as follows :—1. This Act may be cited as the Sri Lanka Disaster
Management Act, No. 13 of 2005, and shall come into
operation on such date (hereinafter referred to as the“appointed date”) as the Minister may appoint by Orderpublished in the Gazette.

Short title.

2. (1) There shall be established a body called the
National Council for Disaster Management (hereinafter inthis Act referred to as the “Council”).

Establishment of
the National
Council for
DisasterManagement.

(2) The Council shall by the name assigned to it bysubsection (1), be a body corporate and shall have perpetual
succession and a common seal and may sue and be sued insuch name.
2 – PL 000093 — 5650 (02/2005)

280

2

Constitution of
the Council.

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005
3. (1) The Council shall consist of —(a) the President, who shall be the Chairman of theCouncil (hereinafter referred to as the “Chairman”);(b) the Prime Minister, who shall be the Vice-Chairmanof the Council;(c) the Leader of the Opposition;(d) the Ministers in charge of the following subjects :—
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
(x)
(xi)
(xii)
(xiii)
(xiv)
(xv)
(xvi)
(xvii)(xviii)(xix)(xx)

Social Welfare ;Rehabilitation and Reconstruction ;Environment ;HomeAffairs ;Health ;Science and Technology ;Housing ;Coast Conservation ;Irrigation ;Power ;
Defence ;Police ;Finance ;Land;
Fisheries and Aquatic Resources ;ForeignAffairs;
Water Supply;
Highways;
Urban Development
Education;(e) the Chief Ministers of every Provincial Council
established by Article 154A of the Constitution :Provided that in case where the Provincial Council is notelected for any Province, the Governor appointed for such
Province; and281

(f) the persons referred to in subsection (3).
(2) The Council shall appoint a person to be the Secretary
to the Council, and the person so appointed shall also be amember of the Council.
(3) The Speaker shall in consultation with the Leader of
the Opposition, nominate five persons from amongst the
opposition Members of Parliament to be members of theCouncil.
(4) The Council may from time to time co-opt as a memberof the Council, any Minister in charge of any other subject
for such period as it may consider necessary.
(5) Where a subject referred to in subsection (1) is a subject
which the President has assigned to himself or is a subject
which has been assigned to the Prime Minister, a person
nominated by the President or the Prime Minister, as the casemay be, shall represent the President or the Prime Minister at
the Council.
4.

The functions of the Council shall be—(a) to formulate a national policy and program on the
management of disasters which shall providefor —(i) the protection of life of the community andenvironment from disaster and themaintenance and development of disaster
affected areas ;(ii) the effective use of resources for preparedness,prevention, response, relief, reconstruction
and rehabilitation ;(iii) the enhancement of public awareness andtraining to help people to protect themselvesfrom disasters ;282

Functions of theCouncil.

(iv)capacity building, among persons living inareas vulnerable to disaster, in relation to risk
management and the application of disastermanagement and mitigation practices ; and(v) pre-disaster planning, preparedness andmitigation while sustaining and further
improving post-disaster relief, recovery andrehabilitation capabilities ;(b ) to prepare and formulate the National Disaster
Management Plan and the National Emergency
Operation Plan based on the national policy andprogram formulated under paragraph (a ), in order toensure —(i) preparedness for disasters and any otheremergencies ;(ii) risk prevention ; and(iii) the prevention and mitigation of disaster ;(c) to monitor the implementation of the National
Disaster Management Plan and the National
Emergency Operation Plan and to submit such plans
to the Cabinet of Ministers for its approval ;(d ) to facilitate emergency response, recovery, relief,
rehabilitation and reconstruction in the event of any
disaster ;(e) where it considers appropriate, to take all steps
necessary to counter any disaster or impending
disaster, in accordance with the National Disaster
Management Plan or in accordance with suchmeasures as may be decided by the Council for such
purposes ;283

(f) to direct, co-ordinate and monitor the activities of
the Disaster Management Centre established under
section 8 and the appropriate organizations
designated under section 21, and to ensure thatavailable resources are used effectively by such
Centre and organizations in the discharge of theirfunctions ;(g ) to ensure that adequate publicity is given to the
National Disaster Management Plan and the National
Emergency Operation Plan;(h ) to specify guidelines to be complied with by every
Ministry, Government Department and public
corporation in the preparation of Disaster
Management Plans under section 10;(i) to facilitate and support local and community self
reliance in the event of any potential or actual
disaster ;(j) to promote public awareness campaigns relating todisaster management and funding of research anddevelopment on disaster management ;(k) to facilitate liaison with organizations and persons
pursuing hazard, vulnerability and risk reduction
studies and implementing action programmes andcommissioning such studies and action programmes;(l) to assign functions and responsibilities to theDisaster Management Centre established under
section 8;(m) to initiate programmes relating to prevention andmitigation of disaster and the provision of relief,
rehabilitation and reconstruction;284

(n ) to appraise the Cabinet of Ministers on all relevant
matters connected with any potential and actual
disasters;(o ) to recommend the allocation of funds for disastermanagement from the relevant authorities and bodies
and the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Fund,established by the Reconstruction andRehabilitation Fund Act, No. 58 of 1993.
Meeting of theCouncil.

5. (1) The Council shall meet as often as may benecessary, but not less than once in every three months.
(2) The Chairman shall, if present preside at all meetingsof the Council. In the absence of the Chairman from any
such meeting of the Council, the Vice-Chairman shall presideat such meeting.
(3) Where both the Chairman and the Vice-Chairman are
not present at any meeting of the Council a member electedby the members present at the meeting from among
themselves, shall preside at such meeting.

Quorum atmeetings.

6. (1) The quorum for any meeting of the Council shallbe one-third of its total membership.
(2) The Council may regulate the procedure in regard to
the meetings of the Council and the transaction of businessat such meetings.

Seal of theCouncil.

7. (1) The seal of the Council shall be determined anddevised by the Council and may be altered in such manner as
may be determined by the Council.
(2) The seal of the Council shall be in the custody of theSecretary to the Council.
(3) The Seal of the Council shall not be affixed to any
instrument or document except with the sanction of theCouncil and in the presence of two members of the Council
who shall sign the instrument or document in token of theirpresence.

285

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005

7(4) The Council shall maintain a register of the
instruments and documents to which the seal of the Council
has been affixed.
8. (1) There shall be established for the purposes of thisAct, a Disaster Management Centre headed by a DirectorGeneral and such number of other directors as may be
determined by the Council. The Director-General and other
Directors shall be appointed by the Council in consultation
with the Minister.
(2) The functions of the Centre established undersubsection (1) shall be as assigned by the Council, and shall
include the following :—(a) assisting the Council in the preparation of the
National Disaster Management Plan and the National
Emergency Operation Plan and proposals for
upgrading the same when it becomes necessary ;(b) taking responsibility for the implementation of the
National Disaster Management Plan and the National
Emergency Operation Plan, and upon the
declaration of a state of disaster to direct and coordinate the implementation of the National
Emergency Operation plan;(c) ensuring that the various Disaster Management Plans
prepared by Ministries, Government Departmentsor public corporations conforms to the National
Disaster Management Plan ;(d) based on Disaster Management Plans prepared byvarious Ministries, Government Departments andpublic corporations under section 10, preparing andimplementing programmes and plans for disaster
preparedness, mitigation, prevention, relief,
rehabilitation and reconstruction activities andcoordinating of organizatins which implement such

286

Establishment ofDisasterManagement
Centre.

8

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005
programmes and plans and obtain financial
assistance form the Treasury for such activities andrelease the same to the relevant regions and monitor
and evaluate these activities ;(e) issuing instructions and guidelines to appropriateorganizations, non-governmental organizations,district secretaries and divisional secretaries on
activities relating to disaster management andinitiating and implementing work programmes inco-ordination with such organizations andsecretaries ;(f) promoting research and development programmes
in relation to disaster management and setting up
and maintaining a data base on disaster management;and(g) submitting reports to the Council from time to time
and whenever required by the Council in regard toits activities.

Appointment ofTechnical
Advisory
Committees.

9. (1) In the discharge of their functions under this Act,
the Council and the Disaster Management Centre shall be
assisted by such number of Techincal Advisory Committees
as shall be deemed necessary by the Council, consisting ofprofessionals and experts having expertise in relation to therespective functions and responsibilities, as the case may be,of the Council.
(2) The members of the TechnicalAdvisory Committees
shall be appointed by the Council.
(3) The Chairmen of the TechnicalAdvisory Committees
constituted under subsection (1), shall be appointed by theCouncil.

DisasterManagementPlan.

10. (1) It shall be the duty of every Ministry,
Government Department and public corporation to prepare a
Disaster Management Plan with respect to such Ministry,

287

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005

9

Government Department, or public corporation, to counterany disaster or impending disaster, based on the National
Disaster Management Plan and in accordance with suchguidelines as may be specified by the Council.
(2) The Disaster Management Centre shall, if requested
by a Ministry, Government Department or public corporationreferred to in subsection (1), extend all necessary assistanceto such Ministry, Department or Corporation, as the case may
be, in the preparation of its Disaster Management Plan.
(3) Every Ministry, Government Department and public
corporation shall on or before such date as shall be determinedby the Council by Order published in the Gazette, submit to
the Centre, a detailed Disaster Management Plan relating to
the disaster counter-measures proposed to be taken by such
Ministry, Government Department, public corporation, as thecase may be, to counter any disaster or impending disaster.
(4) The Centre shall submit every Disaster Management
Plan received by such Centre under subsection (3), to theCouncil for its approval.
11. (1) If at any time, the extent or severity of a disasteror impending disaster is or is likely to be so great, that any
counter-measures that may become necessary to counter suchdisaster or impending disaster are beyond the resources ormeans normally available to the administration, the President
may, on President’s own motion or on the advice of theCouncil, by Proclamation declare that a state of disasterexists, either in respect of any area or areas specified in suchproclamation, or of the whole country.
(2) Subject to the provisions of subsection (3), a
Proclamation made under subsection (1) shall come into
force on the date on which such Proclamation is made andshall, remain in force for a period of two months from the dateof the making of the Proclamation, and may thereafter, if
necessary, be extended for further periods not exceeding twomonths at a time.

288

Declaration ofstate of disaster.

10

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005

(3) A Proclamation made under subsection (1), shall beplaced before Parliament at its first sitting immediately after
the date of declaration of the Proclamation, to be approvedby a resolution of Parliament.
(4) If Parliament does not approve any Proclamation
placed before it, such Proclamation shall, immedately uponsuch disapproval, cease to be valid and have no force in law,
but without prejudice to anything lawfully done thereunder.
Procedure to befollowed upon
the declarationof a state ofdisaster.

12. (1) Upon the declaration of a state of disaster by the
President, the President shall direct any one or more
appropriate organizations designated by the Council under
section 21, to take immediate action to —(a) direct, co-ordinate and use all available resources
as may be necessary within the area or areas inrespect of which a Proclamation has been madeunder subsection (1) of section 11, to counter theefffect of the disaster or the impending disaster orto mitigate the effect of such disaster or impending
disaster ;(b) direct, co-ordinate and use additional resources, if
and when they become available, in accordance withsuch arrangements as may be made in respect of its
allocation ; and(c) take all necessary measures provided for in the
National Disaster Management Plan or the National
Emergency Operation Plan as the case may be, andin accordance with such directions that may be
issued to such appropriate organzation by the
President.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1), upon
the declaration of a state of disaster by President under section
11, it shall be the duty of every Ministry, Government
Department or public corporation, to take all measures necessary
for the immediate implementation of their Disaster
Management Plans prepared under section 10 within theirrespective Ministry, Department, or Corporation, as the casemay be.

289

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005

11

13. (1) Notwithstanding the provisions contained in
section 12, where a state of disaster is declared under section
11, the Council may, wherever it considers necessary or
appropriate, obtain the assistance of any Non-Governmentalorganization, being a non-governmental organization whose
activities are not detrimental to national independence andsovereignty, to assist any appropriate organization in the
discharge of its duties under section 12.

Council to obtainassistance of
nongovernmentalorganizations.

(2) Where any assistance is obtained under subsection (1)from a non-governmental organization, such organization
shall act in accordance with instructions issued by theappropriate organization it is assisting and shall, for service
rendered be paid by the Council out of the Fund of theCouncil, such amount as shall be determined by the Council.
14. (1) It shall be the duty of an appropriate organization
directed to take any action under section 12, to —(a) enter any place where such appropriate organization
believes on reasonable grounds that it is necessary
to enter for the purpose of saving human life or forthe prevention of injury to human life or for the
rescuing of persons whose lives are endangered or
to facilitate the carrying out of any other urgent
measures with respect to relief from suffering anddistress of affected persons ;(b) evacuate people, property and animals from affectedor vulnerable areas ;(c) close traffic on any road, street (whether public or
private) right of way or in any public place, for the
implementation of disaster counter-measures until
the police and the armed forces arrive ;(d) remove any obstruction impeding theimplementation of disaster counter-measures withthe assistance of the police or the armed forces ; and290

Duties of an
appropriateorganization.

12

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005(e) do any other act as such appropriate organization
may consider reasonably necessary for the purposeof implementing effectively any disaster countermeasures or to perform any act preliminary or
incidental to any action directed to be taken bysuch appropriate organization under section 12.

(2) The duties entrusted under subsection (1) on any
appropriate organization shall be performed by suchorganization only within the area or areas in which suchorganization has been authorized to operate by theCouncil, in performing its duties under subsection (1) ofsection 12.
Award ofcompensation.

15. (1) Any person who suffers loss or damage to his or
its property by reason of any act, omission or default in taking
any action by an appropriate organization under subsection(1) of section 12 or in the perfomance of its duties under
section 14 or by a non-governmental organization assisting
an appropriate organization under section 13, or a police
officer or member of the armed forces, shall be entitled tocompensation in respect of any loss or damage caused, of anamount determined by the Divisional Secretary of theDivision within which such property is situated.
(2) The Divisional Secretary may, for the purpose ofdetermining the compensation payable under subsection (1),obtain the assistance of a government assessor.
(3) The amount of compensation paid for any loss ordamage caused to property shall, in case of dispute, be
determined by the District Court within the jurisdiction ofwhich the property is situated, on application made in thatbehalf by the person who suffered such loss or damage, by
way of summary procedure.

291

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005

13

16. The initial capital of the Council shall be ten million
rupees. The amount of this initial capital shall be paid out of
the Consolidated Fund and shall be credited to the Fundestablished under section 17.

Capital of theCouncil.

17. (1) The Council shall have its own Fund. There shallbe credited to the Fund of the Council—

Fund of theCouncil.

(a) money received from the Consolidated Fund, as
initial capital of the Council ;(b) all such sums of money as may be received by theCouncil in the discharge of its functions ; and(c) all such sums of money as may be received by theCouncil by way of loans, donations, gifts or grants
from any lawful source whatsoever, whether in or
outside Sri Lanka.
(2) There shall be paid out of the Fund of the Council all
such sums of money as may be required to defray any
expenditure incurred by the Council in the discharge of its
functions under this Act.
18. (1) The financial year of the Council shall be thecalendar year.

Accounts andaudit.

(2) The Council shall cause proper books of accounts tobe kept of the income and expenditure, assets and liabilities
and all other transactions of the Council.
(3) The provisions of Article 154 of the Constitution
relating to the audit of the accounts of public corporations
shall apply to and in relation to the audit of the accounts of
the Council.
19. The provisions of Part II of the Finance Act, No. 38
of 1971, shall mutatis mutandis, apply to the financial control
and accounts of the Council.

292

Application ofPart II of the
Finance Act, No.
38 of 1971.

14
Staff of theCouncil.

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005

20. (1) The Council may appoint such number ofofficers, servants and agents as it considers necessary for thedischarge of its functions and for the administration andimplementation of this Act.
(2) The officers, servants and agents appointed undersubsection (1) shall be remunerated in such manner and atsuch rates and shall be subject to such conditions of service
as may be determined by the Council.
(3) At the request of the Council, any officer in the public
service may with the consent of that officer and the Secretary
to the Ministry of the Minister in charge of the subject of
Public Administration, be temporarily appointed to the staffof the Council for such period as may be determined by theCouncil with like consent or be permanently appointed tosuch staff with like consent.
(4) Where any officer in the public service is temporarily
appointed to the staff of the Council, the provisions ofsubsection (2) of section 14 of the National Transport
CommissionAct, No. 37 1991 shall, mutatis mutandis, apply
to and in relation to him.
(5) Where any officer in the public service is permanently
appointed to the staff of the Council, the provisions ofsubsection (3) of section 14 of the National Transport
Commission Act, No. 37 of 1991 shall, mutatis mutandis,
apply to and in relation to him.
(6) Where the Council employs any person who hasentered into a contract with the Government by which he has
agreed to serve the Government for a specified period, any
period of service with the Council by that person shall be
regarded as service to the Government for the purpose ofdischarging the obligations of such contract.

Designation of
appropriateorganizations.

21. (1) Whenever the Council considers it appropriate,
the Council may designate any Ministry, Government
Department, Public Corporation or the Disaster Management

293

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005

15

Centre as an appropriate organization (in this Act referred toas an “appropriate organization”) which will be required tocarry out and implement the National Disaster Management
Plan or the National Emergency Operation Plan, as the casemay be, and generally assist the Council in the discharge ofits functions.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1), an
appropriate organization shall also be required to perform
any duties that it may be called upon to do under subsection(1) of section 12, and in general to assist the Council in the
discharge of its functions under this Act.
(3) The Council shall determine and specify the functions
which an appropriate organization should discharge in orderto carry out and implement the respective plans referred toin subsection (1), and where necessary issue guidelines forthe same.
(4) Where an appropriate organization is designated by
the Council under subsection (1), the Council shall by Orderpublished in the Gazette, specify the area or areas in which
each such appropriate organizations, shall carry out its
implementation activities.
(5) An appropriate organization may exercise its powers
under this Act, only through such of its officers as areespecially assigned in writing in that behalf by suchorganization.
22. (1) The Chairman may, subject to such conditions as
may be specified in writing delegate all or any of his powers,
duties or functions under thisAct to any member or officer of
the Council.
(2) Notwithstanding any such delegation undersubsection (1) , the Chairman may exercise, perform ordischarge any power, duty or function so delegated.

294

Delegation of
powers, duties
and functions by
the Chairman.

16

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005

(3) A member or an officer of the Council to whom any
power, duty or function has been delegated under subsection(1) shall, in the exercise, performance or discharge of such
power, duty or function, comply with such directions orconditions as the Chairman may from time to timecommunicate in writing to such member or officer, as thecase may be.
(4) A member or an officer of the Council to whom any
power, duty or function has been delegated under subsection(1) shall have the power to do, all acts and things that are
incidental to the power, duty or function that is so delegated.
Protection foraction taken ingood faith.

23. No suit shall lie against a member of the Council or
any appropriate organization authorized by the President
under section 12, or police officer or a member of the armed
forces for any action which is done in good faith, in theperformance of any duty imposed upon such member,appropriate organization, police officer or a member of thearmed forces as the case may, under this Act.

Offences andpenalties.

24. Every person who assaults, obstructs, threatens,
intimidates, abuses or insults any person exercising any power
or discharging any duty conferred on or imposed on such
person by thisAct, shall be guilty of an offence under thisActand shall on conviction after summary trial before a
Magistrate be liable to imprisonment of either description
for a term not exceeding two years or to a fine not exceeding
twenty five thousand rupees, or to both such imprisonment
and fine.

Interpretation.

25.

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires —“disaster” means the actual or imminent ocurrence of anatural or man-made event, which endangers or
threatens to endanger the safety or health of any
person or group of persons in Sri Lanka, or which
destroys or damages or threatens to destroy ordamage any property, and includes—(a) a landslide;(b) a cyclone;295

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
(m)
(n)
(o)
(p)
(q)
(r)
(s)
(t)
(u)

17

a flood;a drought,
an industrial hazard;
a tsunami (seismic wave);
an earthquake;an air hazard;
a maritime hazard;
a fire;an epidemic;
an explosion;
air raids ;civil or internal strife ;chemical accident;
radiological emergency;
oil spills including inland and marine oilspills;nuclear disaster;urban and forest fire;
coastal erosion; andtornados, lightening strikes and severe
thunder storms;“disaster counter-measures” means measures that arenecessary or desirable to avert, minimize or counterthe effect of an impending disaster or consequent
to a disaster, to mitigate the effect of such disasteron members of the public or any property belonging
to an individual or the State, and includes the
conduct of, or participation in, training for such
purposes ;“public corporation” means any corporation, board orother body which was or is established by or under
any written law with funds or capital wholly or
partly provided by the Government from theConsolidated Fund by way of grant, loan orotherwise; and

296

18

Sri Lanka Disaster Management
Act, No. 13 of 2005
“resources” includes manpower or animals, vehicles,boats, plant, appratus, implements, earthmoving
eqipment or other equipment of any kind, finance,storage facilities, movable and immovable property
considred essential for the life of the community.

Sinhala text toprevail in caseof inconsistency.

26. In the event of any inconsistency between the Sinhala
and Tamil texts of this Act, the Sinhala text shall prevail.

297

298

Annex 3
Road Map Working Groups

299

300

Deputy Director (Hydrology)
Senior Engineer
Scientist-Geotechnical Enggr
Civil Engineer
Supt of Survey
Head Dam Safety Unit
Head, Marine Biological
Resources Division
DD
DD
STO
Faculty of Engineering
GIS Specialist
Technical Officer
Medical Officer
Director

Ms. P.P.G. Dias

Ms. Donetia Fernando

Ms. Kumari M Weerasinghe

Mr. K.M. Kithsiri
Mr. S.D.D.J. Dampegama
Mr. S.K. Weerasena
Ms. Champa Amarasiri

Mr. B.K. Jayasundara
Mr. T.D. Handagama
Prof. S.S.L. Hettiarachchi
Mr. S. Mohanty
Dr. Bipin VermaDr. H.D.B. Herath

Mr. Sarath Weerawarnakula

Ms. P. Thalagala

Designation
Director (Asset Mgt. & Water
Mgt.)
Deputy Director (Dam Safety)

Name
Ms. P.A.S.M. Samarasekara(Team Leader)
Ms. Badra Kamaladasa (Facilitator)

f o r
D R M
i n

GSMB

Telephone Mobile , email number
2586839
id_dgi@sri.lanka.net
2580677
ddds@eureka.lk
2581636dd_hyg@irrigation.slt.lk
2449755/2387920
krmdfernando@fisheries.gov.lk
2588946 ext 235
nbro@sltnet.lk
714290918, 2440016
057-2229315
112505675
2521914champa@nara.ac.lk
2505675
damsafety@slt.lk
2587535
2686087
sslh@civil.mrt.ac.lk
mohanty@un.org
verma@whosrilanka.org
2690927, 0777846226
hdbh@sltnet.lk
2725745, 0777515788
gsmb@slt.lk

M a p

Irrigation Dept
Fire Services
University of Moratuwa
UN-HICWHO
Ministry of Health

MASL

CEB
Survey Dept
MASL
NARA

NBRO

CCD

Irrigation Department

Irrigation Department

Organization
Irrigation Department

Hazard Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Working Group

Members of Working Group for Development of Roadmap

R o a dS r i L a n k a

301

Name

Organization

Multi-Hazard Early Warning System Working Group
Designation

Telephone Mobile , email number

2694104

Dept of Agriculture

0714159671
nrmcdoa@slt.lk

Meteorological Dept

NBRO

2588946
nbro@sltnet.lk

DG

NARA

2521008
emsw@nara@ac.lk

Mr. G.H.P Dharmarathna(Team Leader)

Atomic Energy Authority

2533449, 2533427 Fax 2533448
srlaea@slt.lk

Meteorological Dept

Irrigation Department

ddds@eureka.lk
2588879

DD

Irrigation Department

2581636dd_hyg@irrigation.slt.lk

Mr. L. Chandrapala (Facillitator)

Head, Agro Meteorology
Head, LSSD
Physical Oceanographer
Senior Scientific Officer
Director (Hydrology)
Deputy Director (Hydrology)
Medical Officer

Ministry of Health2665088
meteo@slt.lk

Mr. B.V.R. Punyawardena
Mr. R.M.S. Bandara
Mr. E.M.S. Wijeratna
Mr. A. Jayalath
Mrs. J. Amarakoon
Ms. P. P. G. Dias
Dr. H.D.B. Herath2691605, 0777846226
hdbh@sltnet.lk302

S r i L a n k a
i n
D R M
f o r
M a p
R o a dEnvironmental Adviser
Consultant Microbiologist
Medical Officer
Asst Director
Civil Engineer
Director
SE (North)Chief Fire Officer
Group captain
Wing Commander
LT ColEngineerReg. Prog Coordinator

Consultant (Gen.Mgt & Local
Governance)

Ms. Manel Jayamanna - Facilitator

Dr. Pranitha Premarathne

Dr. H.D.B. Herath

Mr. G.J.K. Gunawardena

Mr. S.S.I. Kodagoda

Mr. M.J.J. Fernando

Mr. M.A.C.M. Fazal

Mr. J. Kannangara

Mr. J.S.I. Wijemanna

Mr. S.D.B. Chandrasekara

Mr. D.C. Keppetiwalana

Mr. R.G.W. Rajapaksa

Mr. Tomas Liew

Mr. S.O.Z. Mawlana

IFRC0773596450
manish.gangal@ifrc.org

2581972, 0777424154
omarmowlana@gmail.com

i n

Sri Lanka Institute of Local
Governance (SLILG)

773157674

2341341

D R M

IFRC

SLT

773237979

714163949

2395500/2441044

26916372323489cmcdza@sltnet.lk

2872409
jayavi@cea.lk

2598215
sadheeri@sltnet.lk

011-2888054

2691605, 0777846226
hdbh@sltnet.lk

2691350somaratnepj@yahoo.com

manel.jayamanna@undp.org

2687537
padmacmc@sltnet.lk

Telephone, Mobile , email

f o r

JOH

Coordinator DMC

S.L.A.F

Fire Service Dept

C.M.C.

CEA

CECB

Ministry of Social Welfare

Ministry of Health

Medical Research Institute

UNDP

C.M.C

Organization

M a p

Mr. Manish Gangal

Director

Designation

Ms. P. Karunaratne - Team Leader

Name

Preparedness and Response Plans and Programmes Working GroupR o a dS r i L a n k a303

Ms. C.H Devendra
Mr. G.V Rathnasara
Mr. R.M.A.K Rathnayake

Mr. K.S.P Jayawardana
Ms. P.S.D. Silva

Mr. J.M.L Gonawela
Mr. B.P.N. Mendis
Mr. Prasanna Silva

Mr. S.K. Wijethunga

Mr. L.T. Kiringoda

Mr. N.S. Wijerathne

Ms. Malaka Disanayake

Mr. K.A.W Kodithuwakku
Mr. H.R. Gunathilake

Name
Mr. U.W.L Chandradasa
Team Leader
Mr. K.N. Bandara

Irrigation Department

Dept of Irrigation
Dept of Irrigation
Sri Lanka Institute of Local
Governance (SLILG)

Add. GM
Dept of Irrigation

Senior Hydrologist
DGM(OH)
Addl. DG

Additional GM, RO

Director,(Eng and Project Planning)

Senior Engineer

Environment Scientist

DGM (Hydrology)
DD

Engineering Geologist

Designation
Director (Technology and Mitigation)DD

Deputy Director (Dam
Safety)DD
DD
Consultant / PhysicalPlanning

CEB
DD P&D

Water Resource Board
CEB
UDA

NWS&DB

Tsunami Housing
Reconstruction Unit

SLLR&DC

UDA

Water Resource Board
UDA

Landslide Div, NBRO

DMC

2875905 , Fax 2883670
d_ensacape@uda.lk
2867532, Fax 2862457
sllrdcrd@sltnet.lk
28669940
ltkinin@thru.gov.lk
Fax 2635996
rororo@sltnet.lk
65294 , Fax 2669294
0777-423914 , Fax 2543267
0777380166
adg@uda.lk
0777-380166 Fax 2543267
2586912
dd-des@irrigation.slt.lk,
258691225869122581982 , 0773046929 ,ajithrathnayake9@hotmail.com ,ajithrathnayake7@yahoo.com
2580677
ddds@eureka.lk
2505675
damsafety@slt.lk

Telephone, Mobile , email number
281917(Res), 278766
uwlchandra@sltnet.lk,
2588946 , Fax 2502611
nbro@sltnet.lk
2692120 , Fax 2669294
Fax 2872260

Mitigation and Integration of Disaster Risk Reduction into Development Working GroupMs. Badra Kamaladasa

MASL

Organization

Ms. P. Thalagala

304

S r i L a n k a
i n
D R M
f o r
M a p
R o a d

DMC - Kaluthara
DMC - Humbanthota
DMC - Trinco
DM - Cordinator
DMC - Ampara

Lt Col. H.M.U.B Herath

Wg Crd M.G.M Chandralal

Cdr. S.J.S.N Silva

Mr. Charles Byamuhisha

Mr. S.N. Gunarathne
STF

IFRC

Sri Lanka Navy

Sri Lanka Airforce

Sri Lanka Army

Sri Lanka Army

SLRCS

DMC - Matara

Lt Col. H.K.P. Peris

Sri Lanka Army

Mr. Susil Perera

General Staff Officer, Directorate ofOperations

Lt Col. W.L.P.W. Perera

Sri Lanka Navy

0773596450
manish.gangal@ifrc.org
susilp@redcross.lk

0773157668

0777304387

0777303407

0773115513

0714-224848
kumudul@hotmail.com

0773257900
lpwperera@yahoo.com

0114-632452

0777901320
knana320@hotmail.com

Email-Telephone

f o r

IFRC

DD- Naval Projects and Planning

Cpt. D.N.S. Ulugethenna

CHPB

Organization

M a p

Mr. Manish Gangal

Visiting Faculty

Designation

Mr. Kamal Nanayakkara(Team Leader)

Name

Community Based Disaster Risk Management Working GroupR o a dD R M
i n
S r i L a n k a305

Mr.C.M.R. Antony

Mr. V.S. Swaminathan

Mr. D.N. Wanigasuriya
Mr. R.M. Abeyratne
Ms. Kumudu Abesekara

Name
Dr. Buddhi Weerasinghe(Team Leader)
Mr. A.M.T.B. Attanayake
Mr. Suren Pieris

Director, Social Science
Coordinator-Galle
Coordinator-Puttlam
Coordinator- Gampaha
Consultant (Engineering)

Director, Dept of Science

Social Service Office r
Senior Asst Secretary
Deupty Chief Secretary.,
Planning
NEPC

Designation
Consultant-Training,
Education, P.Awareness
DFO
Deputy Director General

Dept of Social Service
Prime Ministers Office
Chief Secretary’s OfficeSecretary, Rehabilitation andSocial welfare
NIE

2851301-5, ext334
mario123@sltnet.lk
batuwita@sltnet.lk,rrnepc@sltnet.lk
773800142
714204646
714918644
2580335(Office), 031-2258562 (Res)
angdilanlaksiri@yahoo.com

262222008

Organization
Email-Telephone
DMC
0776-363848
buddhi4@hotmail.com
Fire Brigade (Colombo)
776113578, 2686080
Sri Lanka Red Cross Society 077-3228987
ddg@redcross.lk
2825216, 2825232
2375442, 077306350
091-2234503

Public Awareness, Education and Training Working Group

Ms. Lalitha Batuwitage
Lt.Col J Hettiarachchi
Lt.Col M. Mudannayake
Cdr. N.G.E Ratnayake
Mr. Dilan Fernando Pulle

NIE
DMC
DMC
DMC
Sri Lanka Institute of Local
Governance306

S r i L a n k a
i n
D R M
f o r
M a p
R o a d307

Commissioner (Industrial
Safety), Chief Factory
Inspecting Engineer
Senior Engineer(Research & Design
Division

Mr. W.A. Peter

Mr. Rohan Edirisinghe

Consultant

Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu Consultant

Eng. Bandula
Wickramarachchi

Designation
Director

Name
Mr. Sarath Weerawarnakula

Coast Conservation
Department

Department of Labour

Organization
GSMB

2388366; 077 779 2966
bwickramarachchi@fisheries.gov.lk;
engwicky@sltnet.lk

Email-Telephone2725745, 0777515788
gsmb@slt.lk
011236825, wapeterr@yahoo.com

Others who contributed in developing, refining or editing proposals

308