Water for the Recovery of
the Climate - A New Water
Paradigm

M. Kravčík, J. Pokorný, J. Kohutiar,
M. Kováč, E. Tóth1

Authors:

Ing. Michal Kravčík, CSc., (1956) completed his studies in Waterworks Construction
and Water Management at the Slovak Technical University and worked for the Instituteof Hydrology and Hydraulics and the Institute of Ecology of the Slovak Academy of
Sciences. He is the founder of the People and Water NGO, a holder of the Goldman
Environmental Prize and a member of ASHOKA: Innovators for the Public, aninternational network of innovators who work for public welfare. He is the mostprominent representative of the People and Water NGO, which has been awarded the EUUSA Prize for Democracy and Civil Society Development.
RNDr. Jan Pokorný, CSc., (1946) completed his studies at the Natural Sciences Facultyat Charles University in Prague. He is the director general of the beneficial society ENKI,
a scientific staffer at the Institute for Systems Biology and Ecology of the Academy of
Sciences of the Czech Republic, the co-author of a number of patents, a university
lecturer, a member of the international scientific panel of the Natural Resources
Commission for the Australian government and a member of the scientific technology
panel of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands for Central and Eastern Europe.
Ing. Juraj Kohutiar (1961), completed his studies in Waterworks Construction andWater Management at the Slovak Technical University, worked at the Institute ofHydrology and Hydraulics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences and at present cooperates
as a consultant with the People and Water NGO.
Ing. Martin Kováč (1972), completed his studies in Waterworks Construction andWater Management at the Slovak Technical University, worked in the area of protectionof the national cultural heritage, was the co-founder and the first director of the National
Trust in Slovakia, is a member of international network ASHOKA. At present he works
as specialist for anti-flood prevention at the Association of Cities and Municipalities of
Slovakia.
RNDr. Eugen Tóth (1964), completed studies at the Mathematics-Physics Faculty of
Comenius University. He works in the field of information systems with a focus on
geographic information systems (GIS) and agricultural land. He cooperates with the NGO
People and Water as a project manager.

2Authors:
Ing. Michal Kravčík, CSc., RNDr. Jan Pokorný, CSc., Ing. Juraj Kohutiar,
Ing. Martin Kováč, RNDr. Eugen Tóth
Consultants:
Prof. Ing. Rudolf Midriak, DrSc.; RNDr. Václav Cílek, CSc.; PhDr. Gabriel Bianchi, CSc.;
Ing. Viktor Nižňanský, PhD.; PhDr. Róbert Kotian; Ing. arch. Radoslav Mokriš;Prof. RNDr. Michal Hnatič, DrSc.

Preparation of diagrams and graphs: Ing. arch. Ľubica Mokrišová
Photographers: Ing. Michal Kravčík, CSc.; RNDr. Jan Pokorný, CSc.;
RNDr. Eugen Tóth
Title page illustration: Ing. Stanislav Staško
English translation: David McLean and Jonathan Gresty
Printed by: Krupa Print, Žilina
Publication printed with the financial support of: Municipalia a.s. and TORY
Consulting a.s.
ISBN:
Year of publication: 2007

This publication originated through partner cooperation between the People andWater NGO, the Association of Towns and Municipalities of Slovakia, thecommunity help society ENKI and the Foundation for the Support of Civic
Activities. Its completion would have been much more difficult without the supportof colleagues and friends from People and Water.

3

CONTENTS
CONTENTS........................................................................................................................ 4
1 THE REASON FOR THE FORMULATION AND THE MISSION OF THE NEW
WATER PARADIGM ........................................................................................................ 5
2 WATER AND ITS CIRCULATION IN NATURE ...................................................... 11
2.1 The four "environments" of water .......................................................................... 11
2.2 Water and thermal energy....................................................................................... 14
2.3. The large water cycle ............................................................................................. 16
2.4 The small water cycle ............................................................................................. 17
2.5 The balance of the water cycle................................................................................ 18
3 THE ROLE OF PLANTS IN THE CIRCULATION OF WATER AND IN THE
TRANSFORMATION OF SOLAR ENERGY ................................................................ 23
3.1 The flow and distribution of solar energy on land.................................................. 23
3.2 Flora, water and the distribution of heat ................................................................. 25
3.3 The impact of drainage and the removal of vegetation on the release of heat........ 28
4 THE IMPACT OF THE EXPLOITATION OF LAND ON THE CIRCULATION OF
WATER ............................................................................................................................ 34
4.1 Forests ..................................................................................................................... 34
4.2 Agricultural land ..................................................................................................... 37
4.3 Bodies of water ....................................................................................................... 41
4.4 Towns...................................................................................................................... 42
5 THE CONSEQUENCES OF A DECREASE IN THE WATER OF THE SMALL
WATER CYCLE .............................................................................................................. 49
5.1 The impact of the decrease in the water of the small water cycle on the growth ofclimate extremes ........................................................................................................... 49
5.2 The impact of the decrease in the water of the small water cycle on rising oceanlevels ............................................................................................................................. 52
5.3 The impact of the decrease in the water of the small water cycle on the rise inglobal tension ................................................................................................................ 54
6 THE OLD AND THE NEW WATER PARADIGM .................................................... 63
6.1 The old water paradigm .......................................................................................... 63
6.2 The new water paradigm......................................................................................... 67
7 INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE USE OF RAINWATER ............................. 76
7.1 The conservation of rainwater in our history.......................................................... 76
7.2 The principles, methods and advantages of conserving rainwater on land............. 79
7.3 The civil sector........................................................................................................ 80
7.4 The economic sector ............................................................................................... 82
7.5 Public sector institutions ......................................................................................... 84
7.6 Financial costs and the assessment of scenarios ..................................................... 86
8 CLOSING SUMMARY................................................................................................. 92

4

1 THE REASON FOR THE FORMULATION AND THE
MISSION OF THE NEW WATER PARADIGM

Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler.
Albert Einstein
By the expression "paradigm" we understand a set of suppositions,concepts and attitudes of a group of scientists in regards to a particular What is ascientific problem. The term in this spirit is associated particularly with "paradigm"?
the name of Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996), a professor of the philosophy
and history of science. Professor Kuhn dates the beginnings of his theory of scientificrevolution to the time when he was preparing his doctoral dissertation. At that time heread Aristotle's Physics, which was, until the time of Isaac Newton, the most authoritative
work in the field. Kuhn was shocked by Aristotle's dissimilarity to Newton and by his
seemingly incorrect, even incomprehensible logic. However, when he was able to adopt a
different method of looking at Aristotle and some of his basic concepts, the booksuddenly began to make real sense to him.1
Kuhn observed with surprise that the term "motion," unlike that of Thinking in
Newton's (and his own) understanding, means in Aristotle's physics not conventional
only a change in the position of the object being investigated, but also ways
other changes, such as growth, a change in temperature, healing
processes and the like.2 Just as Kuhn needed to free his mind of conventional ideas inorder to understand Aristotle, an understanding of the work presented here may also
require a certain distancing from some current popular theories and ways of perception.
When, for example, this work speaks about water, so long as it is not specified otherwise,
it means not only the water in rivers and in lakes which we can see, but also water in allof its states, forms and occurrences. Water vapor and clouds in the atmosphere are morethan only poetic reflections of water in the ground and in open reservoirs. Water in livingorganisms, particularly in plants, is likewise the subject of our attention.
Along with his many works of philosophy and various scientific The
disciplines, Aristotle also wrote the work Meteorologica. Unlike today's possibility ofnarrow understanding of this scientific field as being one concerned with challenging aatmospheric phenomena, Aristotle covers in reference to this topic a paradigm
broad spectrum of knowledge and concepts about the Earth.
Meteorologica is not one of the best works of this brilliant philosopher, but Aristotle's
authority from ancient times up to the beginning of the modern age was so great, thanks
to his brilliant philosophical work, that hardly anyone dared to challenge him in other1

Thomas Kuhn, "What Are Scientific Revolutions?” from The Probablistic Revolution, Volume I: Ideas in
History, eds. Lorenz Kruger, Lorraine, J. Daston, and Michael Heidelberger (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,
1987), http://www.units.muohio.edu/technologyandhumanities/kuhn.htm
2
ibid.

5

fields of knowledge either. The expansion in exploration and new geographicaldiscoveries in the 16th century gradually showed the obvious fallacy of many concepts
and statements included in Meteorologica. Aristotle's Meteorologica in this case canserve as an example of a paradigm which ceased to remain valid and which needed to be
replaced with a new one which would present a better picture of reality.
The theme of this publication is a paradigm about water, that is, a sum of The mystiquesuppositions, concepts and attitudes of different groups in society (not of water
only scientists) about water. Water is a natural subject for a paradigm,
even though it doesn't have to be articulated in scientific formulas. Poets have sung of themysticism of water; philosophers writing at the time of the birth of philosophy in ancient
Greece considered water to be one of the foundations of the world. The ocean was,according to Homer, "the father of all gods."3 Thales of Miletus considered it to be theelemental matter of the world.4 According to Empedocles and others, water was one of
the fundamental elements of the world, along with earth, fire and air. Water as the basisof life and as a purifying medium has been richly represented in the symbols of theworld's religions. In the Bible, the original paradise is described as the Garden of Eden,
supplied with water from four rivers (the Euphrates and Tigris among them). A personformally becomes a Christian through baptism with water. Hindus, in their desire forliberation, plunge into the Ganges River, and the promised paradise to believers in the
Koran also teems with the water of rivers. In the spiritual perceptions of humanity,
harmony with water and with its natural circulation is felt as a gift, a goodness or a
blessing, and disharmony with it and the extremes of its circulation are considered as apunishment, an evil or a curse.
Water is first and foremost a basic element of life. Life, according to The rise andpresent theories, originated in water, expanded to land and without water fall ofwould cease to exist. Water is also an indispensable component in the civilizations
history of human civilizations. The greatest human civilizations emerged
directly around sources of water: the Nile in Egypt, the Euphrates and Tigris in
Mesopotamia, the Yellow River in China. Their prosperity depended greatly on theirhaving an abundance of water. Water helped fulfill both the lower and the higher needs ofpeople, provided them with sustenance, protection, energy, transportation, rest, beauty,
harmony and inspiration. From history we know of civilizations which successfully
developed around fertile land with rich vegetation and an abundance of water. It is
possible that many of them, however, brought about their own decline or extinction
through the degradation of their sources of water. Today we have become used to seeingarchaeologists digging up evidence of ancient, once thriving civilizations in the desert orin the semiarid lands of Northern Africa, the Middle East, Iraq, Iran or in other parts of
the world. But it doesn't occur to us that these civilizations possibly died out in a process
which is still going on around us today.

34

Homer, Iliad, XIV, 201
Diogenes Laertius: "Thales... designated water as the principle of everything."

6

The relationship of civilizations to water has changed over the course of The need forhistory. In some civilizations water was worshipped. In the 20th century a newpeople attempted to confine and subjugate water. Progress in the spirit of paradigm
the communist slogan: "we command the wind and the rain" was, fromthe viewpoint of immediate solutions, more effective, but from theviewpoint of sustainability even worse than the worshipping of water.
Water cannot be commanded; a more sensitive approach is required. The need forformulating a paradigm is a consequence of the failure of traditional ideas (in thispublication, we refer to them as the "old paradigm") to offer lasting, sustainable solutions
to some of the burning questions of water resources and water circulation. The paradigm
formed slowly in the environment of a civic association concerned with the scientific andpractical aspects of these questions. The first reports were published in the early 1990s.5
Its origin was accompanied by a gradual examination of the knowledge acquired throughlong years of practice and by the broadening of our knowledge base. Its publication is anexpression of the concern and care of a group of citizens interested in public affairs. It is
assembled with the objective of reassessing the present unsatisfactory approach to waterand the water cycle.
This work is not founded on new, revolutionary knowledge; its newness A different
arises more from thinking through existing knowledge to its logical angle of view
consequences. Despite this fact, we are convinced that it is a pioneering
work, that it fundamentally changes water-management practice andmay be a great inspiration for further research and for the scientific community. Scientificresearch programs and materials have engaged with climatic changes for many years now
around the world, and they have extended over a rather large range. They reduce thewhole process of these changes, however, almost exclusively to the question of so-calledgreenhouse gases. Many scientists themselves, in numerous works, state that theconnection of the hydrosphere or changes in the water (hydrological) cycles with climatechanges is great but has so far been insufficiently studied.6 While attention thus far has
focused on the impact of climate changes on the water cycle,7 the altered paradigm
recommends concentrating attention on the impact of changes in the water cycle on
climate changes. If the alternative view presented in this publication is correct, it opens
the possibility of a constructive solution to many of the problems associated with climaticchanges. The plan for saturating the small water cycle through the conservation of
rainwater on land is, from the point of view of the authors of this publication, arevolutionary solution to the given problems.

5

For example, The Principles of Water Management Policies and Proposed Measures – An Alternative
Proposal, Water for the Third Millennia, Slovak River Network, Košice, 1993
6
For example, Prof. RNDr. Milan Lapin, CSc., "A Brief Theory about the Climatic System of the Earth,"
particularly in connection with changes in the climate; modification of the professor's inauguration speechfrom 20 September 2004, Internet
7

For example, European Commission, Climate Change Impacts on the Water Cycle, Resources andQuality; Brussels, 25 – 26 September 2006, Conference Proceedings, Scientific and Policy Report, EUR
22422

7

In addition to this introduction and the concluding chapter, which Content ofsummarizes the message of the publication and the new paradigm, the the chapterswork is divided into a number of additional chapters. Chapter Two
briefly introduces us to the four "environments" of water and to themechanisms of the large and small water cycles and the balance ofenergy in them. It briefly mentions the water balance and also points out
the great significance of seemingly minute changes to it. Since water and vegetation playa decisive role in the transformation of solar energy falling on the earth's surface and isclearly involved in the water cycle of a country, Chapter Three deals with these important
relations—it describes the flow of solar energy between the Sun and the Earth, thedistribution of solar energy on land, the ability of the biomass to transform solar radiation
into other forms of energy, as well as the importance of evaporation from the ground andfrom plants for the distribution of heat in ecosystems and the consequences of drainage
and removal of vegetation in freeing up heat on land. Chapter Four clarifies the history
and impact of the exploitation of land on changes to the runoff rates of water from land
and also implies an association with some negative phenomena, not the least of which issoil erosion. Chapter Five addresses changes to the temporal and spatial breakdown ofprecipitation activities through the influence of human beings and the impacts of thesechanges not only on local and global climates but particularly on the rise in extreme
weather events. We dissect in this chapter the reason for rising ocean levels from an angle
and with an emphasis that are different from those which the reader is commonly used toseeing. We also fleetingly touch on the unhappy expectations of world society regarding
further development of the mentioned changes and their impacts on the growth of global
tension and the destabilization of life on Earth. The essence of this publication is thenfound in Chapter Six, which, after a brief recapitulation of present attitudes towards
questions of water management and their impacts, summarizes the new attitude towards
water in the new water paradigm. In addition to proposing a new "culture" in our attitude
towards water, it proposes a method of mitigating or redressing the greatest damage
caused by current water management practices on land. Chapter Seven opens with a shorthistorical look at some aspects of land and water management in our geographic space. It
contains an outline of practical measures for the harvesting of rainwater on land, adescription of possible, or proposed processes which will emerge from acceptance of the
new water paradigm for public sector institutions as well as for the civil and commercial
sectors. Last but not least, this chapter offers a picture of the financial costs andeffectiveness of the proposed new processes and measures in comparison with current
approaches.
Mistakes that people make with strategic decisions or at the beginning of
Ideas havea great work can have long-term and far-reaching negative consequences
consequences. A distorted view on a problem can often lead tocounterproductive measures. That's why knowledge of the correct paradigms is importantin many fields of public policy. This knowledge is no small matter, and people often
reach it using a method of trial and error which can sometimes be very expensive. We arewitnesses to the fact that the problems of water and its circulation are solved on all levels:
the international, the national, the regional, the local, the communal and the individual.
The offered paradigm for water is relevant to each of these levels because it puts them in8

a continuum and in each, water in all its forms and expressions is a question of prosperity
and decline, even of life and death.
As far as the management of water on the state level is concerned, thekey processes are creating strategic policy decisions, defining legislative The role ofthe state
instruments and determining the different authorities and responsibilitiesof state administration and local government, as well as a system ofusing financial resources for the protection, creation and utilization of water resources.
The state at present supervises and looks after the realization of all the mentioned matters
as well as other affairs. If, however, its attention and measures are not aimed at achieving
a permanently sustainable water balance on the territory of the state, including waterbalances on the territory of regions, towns and communities, the state, in the sense of thisnew paradigm, is acting irresponsibly towards the property and health of its own citizens,even towards the international society of nation states.
Local governments are responsible for the development of their own The role ofcommunities. The care for water on the level of local administration is a local
key to the happiness of citizens and the health and safety of the government
environment. Towns and municipalities need to resolve effectively andas soon as possible the protection of their land from flooding, drought and fire, and at thesame time secure an abundance of quality water for maintaining development of thecommunity. The development of municipalities is thus dependent on a sufficiency ofwater and a stable water regime which does not threaten the well-being of thecommunity. The development of municipalities must also be built on the principle ofwater tolerance, i.e. carrying out on the local level management of water resources which
does not contribute to the increased threat of neighboring communities. Recognition of
the possible impacts of the local influences of humanity on wider connections, even on
global changes in the water cycle, creates a foundation for successful, professionally andeffectively manageable solutions on the local level according to the well-known principleof "think globally, act locally!". Sustainable solutions on the local level contribute tostability on the regional, continental and global level. The submitted paradigm offers
sufficient inspiration for both global thinking and local action.
Some business entities are engaged in trading with water and satisfying
the economic, social and environmental needs of society. If they use Doingbusiness withwater from natural sources and do not return it to the water cycle, water
however, they cause a deficiency of water and grave negative changes inthis cycle. They often, in the end, do harm both to their customers and themselves. This
new paradigm for water therefore opens up space for businesses to strengthen their own
interest in the conservation and renewal of water in the water cycle.
At present, the individual is placed in the position of consumer of water Possibilities
and for the most part is neither aware of his own share of responsibility forfor the protection of water nor of the possibilities or threats which water individuals(or the lack of it) may bring. And yet each roof and each yard of afamily home is a microwatershed on which the annual sum of precipitation represents a9surprisingly large volume of water. Water is an asset which the individual citizen can use
to improve his own life in a variety of ways. He can also, however, without any profit andfor a fee, flush it into rivers and into the sea and thus slowly contribute to thedesertification of his own environment and microclimate and, in time, to macroclimaticchanges. The new water paradigm makes this choice a conscious one.
The publication of the paradigm is, in the opinion of its authors, a step
towards a responsible approach and greater critical thinking with no The common
intention of offending anyone associated with the "old paradigm" or good
hurting anyone associated with the changes that could result from thechange in paradigm. The new paradigm should be accepted in the spirit that it is offered.
The authors provide an independent view on the global scenario of the circulation ofwater with its effects on a continental, national, regional or town level, so that thisknowledge will contribute to the common good. The acceptance of the paradigm, besides
other suggested activities, ultimately means the acceptance of a new higher culture in
relation to water and thus also a total overhaul of the cultural character of our civilization.
In the end result, it's about much more than just water.

10

2 WATER AND ITS CIRCULATION IN NATURE
Now the sun, moving as it does, sets up processes of change and becoming and decay,and by its agency the finest and sweetest water is every day carried up and is dissolved
into vapour and rises to the upper region, where it is condensed again by the cold and soreturns to the earth.
Aristotle, Meteorologica
Thales of Miletus considered water to be the prime matter of the world. Empedocles andsome other ancients, but also later Medieval and Renaissance thinkers, considered it aprime matter of the world along with earth, fire and air. In this chapter we "set the stage"
for water, and we sketch out a mechanism for its interaction with the other mentioned"basic elements" during its circulation in nature.

2.1 The four "environments" of water
There are around 1400 million cubic kilometers of water on Earth. When
we speak about water in this document, we have in mind water in four
"environments": water in the seas and oceans, water on land, water in
the atmosphere and water in living organisms (tab. 1). At the same time
we have in mind water in all of its states: gaseous, liquid and solid.

The
environmentsof water

Water of the "first environment," that is, in the seas and oceans, covers
Water in the
70.8% of the surface of the Earth and forms the largest part, up to oceans
97.25%, of the volume of all water on Earth. The seas and oceans have a
key global thermoregulational function for our planet. Their temperature in the course ofa year changes only minimally. If they were not here, however, fluctuations of extreme
temperatures (such as occur, for example, on the moon) would afflict our planet, which
would then be unable to sustain life on Earth as we know it. And only slightly larger
fluctuations of temperature, in comparison with the present, could have fatal
consequences on the food security of our planet. Among other functions of the seas andoceans, the supply of precipitation to land will be of especial interest to us in thispublication.
Our image of water in the "second environment" of land is often
distorted and fixed only on water in rivers, or perhaps in natural and Water on land
artificial reservoirs. Water in its solid state (glaciers, snow), however,forms 2.05% of the volume of all water on Earth and contains up to 70% of the world's
reserves of fresh water (tab. 2). Alongside this water, visible surface water in rivers forms
only 0.0001% and in lakes (inclusive of salt lakes and inland seas) 0.01% of the volumeof all water on Earth. Groundwater and soil moisture represent, alongside the oddly
11placed glaciers, the largest wealth of water on land (0.685%), exceeding the volume ofwater in all rivers and lakes of the world many times over. Water in the soil is, in terms ofamount and usefulness, more important than water in rivers. This undiscovered andmisunderstood treasure is, however, overlooked and neglected, and as a result, decimated.
This publication is particularly concerned about its improvement with the help of waterfrom the "third environment."
The volume of water in the atmosphere (in all three states) is Water in theapproximately ten times greater than the volume of all the water in all atmosphererivers. Theoretically, if all the water in the atmosphere were to suddenly
fall in the form of precipitation, it would cover the surface of the earth
with an imaginary layer of water 25 mm in depth. Just as the seas and oceans hold the
key to the global thermoregulatory function for our planet, the water in the atmosphere
has a key role to play in local thermoregulation.
Water surrounds us. It is, however, not only around us but inside of us,
too. Water in living organisms, that is, in the "fourth environment," Water in thebiota
forms approximately 0.00004% of the volume of all water on Earth,which is in terms of volume the least of the four environments. But what is missing involume is greatly made up for by the fundamental importance of this water for every
individual form of life. The human body, for example, contains more than 60% water andall physiological processes in it take place in an environment made up primarily of water.
The content of water in plants differs according to the species and is often much higher
than in animal tissues. The volumes of water accumulated in vegetation are notinsignificant, equally the volumes of water accumulated in the soil thanks to the existenceof vegetation. Vegetation on land has, besides other functions, a hugely important role
particularly in the regulation of evaporation from the ground, thus significantly helping
maintain the thermal stability on land upon which its own success, even its existence, isgreatly dependent. All higher forms of life on Earth are dependent on the existence andprosperity of vegetation.

12

Tab. 1 The allocation of stocks of water on Earth8
Volume of water (in millions of km3) As a percent of the total

Reservoir
Oceans and seas

1370

97.25

29
9.5

2.05
0.68

Lakes
Soil moisture

0.125
0.065

0.01
0.005

Atmosphere

0.013

0.001

0.00170.00061408.7053

0.00010.00004100

Icebergs and glaciers
GroundwaterRivers
Biosphere
Total global reservoir of water

Tab. 2 Area of continents, oceans, deserts and glaciated territory and the number of
inhabitants on the continent9
Area in km

glaciated
land in km2

2mean heightofcontinents
in m above
sea level

Continents as a whole
EuropeAsia
AfricaNorth and Central
America*South America
Australia and Oceania
Antarctica
Oceans

149 409 000
10 382 000
44 410 000
30 329 000
24 360 000

16 081 030
115 000
89 00015
2 049 000

290
960
650
715

17 843 000
8 910 000
13 175 000
361 455 000

25 000
1 015
13 802 000

580
340
2 000

Pacific
Atlantic
IndianArctic Sea
Earth in total

179 680 000
94 243 000
76 170 000
11 362 000
510 864 000

Area of desert
over 20,000
km2 in km2

13 771 000

Number ofresidents
in mil. (year2000)

3 480 000
8 922 000
39 000

6 076
729
3 686
796
835

160 000
1 170 000

30

Averagedepth of theoceans in m

4 028
3 542
3 710
1 228

* including Greenland, which despite political and historical associations with Denmark
and Europe, geographically belongs to the North American continent. Its glaciatedterritory totals 1,802,600 km2** the glaciated area of the Alps totals 3,600 km2

89Various encyclopedia resources
Source: www.geohive.com and other encyclopedia resources13

2.2 Water and thermal energy
Water is exceptional in the fact that at temperatures common on Earth it The
can occur naturally in all three states: solid, liquid and gaseous. Upon its absorption orchange of state it consumes, or frees, a certain amount of thermal freeing ofenergy. By the change from solid or liquid forms into water vapor it heatacquires a high mobility, thanks to which relatively large volumes areable to quickly shift in horizontal and vertical directions. Water has at the same time also
the largest measured heat capacity (that is, the ability to absorb thermal energy) of all
known substances. Thanks to this ability to bind and to release energy, as well as theability of transfer, reflect or diffuse energy, water in all its states can cool or heat theplanet as needed. It maintains it at such temperatures which make life on Earth possible.
Water balances the thermal extremes between day and night, between
The
the individual seasons and between individual regions while at the same balancing oftime tempering extremes in the weather. Water vapor is the most temperatures
widespread greenhouse gas in the atmosphere.10 Its concentration in theatmosphere is quite variable, but it typically fluctuates between 1-4% (by comparison, theconcentration of CO2 is 0.0383%). The more water there is in the atmosphere, thestronger its moderating effect on temperatures and the fewer the deviations in theweather. The less water there is in the atmosphere, the weaker its moderating effect on
temperatures and the more extreme the deviations in the weather. Where water is lacking
in the soil and in the atmosphere, extreme thermal conditions usually predominate. Water
and water vapor influence in the most significant way the climate on Earth. Despite thisfact, its role in the atmosphere is one of the least researched and rarely discussed
questions.11
Falling solar radiation evaporates water from seas, lakes, rivers, The coolingwetlands, soil and plants into the atmosphere. The evaporation of each funtion ofmolecule of water consumes heat and thus cools the Earth's surface. rain
Evaporated water in the atmosphere condenses and forms clouds, fog,water precipitation or ice crystals. Water vapor which rises higher into the atmospherecondenses under the influence of the cold air and thus releases thermal energy. Cooledhigh in the atmosphere, it returns back to the ground in the form of rain. The repetition ofthis process represents the acting mechanism for the elimination of surplus thermalenergy and resembles an ingenious piece of cooling equipment. It is usually true thatroughly half of the Earth's surface is at any given time shadowed by cloud cover. Clouds
limit the entry of solar radiation into the atmosphere and onto the surface of the Earth.
The limiting of the solar radiation that falls on the surface of the Earth decreases
evaporation and thus the further formation of clouds.

10

See, for example: "The Climatic Effects of Water Vapour," Feature: May 2003,
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/16/5/7/1
11See, for example: "Water Vapour Supplies New Climate Clues," August 2002,
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/6/8/7/1#020805

14

Clouds play an important role in the regulation of the Earth's energybalance in regards to solar radiation. They reflect part of the shortwave The
solar radiation, thus limiting its entry into the atmosphere and to the thermoregulat
ional function
surface of the Earth and thus protecting the Earth from excessive of clouds
warming. However, they also capture part of the longwave (thermal)
radiation from the Earth which would otherwise escape into space; they
thus have a warming effect as well. The cooling or warming effect ofclouds depends on their type and their altitude. Low-altitude cumulus clouds cool the
Earth while thin, high-altitude cirrus clouds have a warming effect.12 Research on thethermoregulatory effects of clouds and their equilibrium have been shown to be very
promising and very interesting with regard to the present problems of humanity.
If solar radiation falls on a surface well stocked with water, the majority Evaporationof the solar energy is consumed in evaporation, the remainder for andsensible heat, heating the ground, reflection, or photosynthesis. If the vegetation
sun's rays falls on a drained area, most of the solar radiation is converted
into sensible heat, while in areas that are sufficiently damp year-round most solar energy
is consumed for evaporation. Therefore, water surfaces, soil saturated with water andvegetation all play an important role in the circulation of water on land. Functional
vegetation fulfills the function of a valve between the ground and the atmosphere. It
protects the ground from overheating, and thus drying out, and optimizes the amount of
evaporation through the help of transpiration through the many pores (stomata) on theleaves. Vegetation well stocked with water thus has a significant cooling effect and airconditioning capability. Vegetation—its amount, type and, last but not least, quality—
significantly influences surface runoff in watersheds, too. Through deforestation, throughagriculture and through urban activities, the amount of water on land has changed.
Humanity is thus unwittingly changing the flows of massive amounts of water and energy(for more details see Chapter 3).
Heat (and gravitation) is the motor of the global water cycle, which
Purifying andconsists of the large and small water cycles (Fig. 1). Water in the transportwater cycle is the blood and lymph of life, which, under the influence characteristics
of solar energy and gravitation, flows, circulates and vibrates in all its
forms between the seas, the land and the atmosphere. When passing
through the atmosphere, it absorbs carbon dioxide and ammonia as well as other gases
and impurities. Similarly, it is also enriched by various minerals when flowing across the
Earth's surface or during infiltration through the soil and subsoil. Through all of these
movements, water drives, cleans and thermoregulates ecosystems, but it also erodes thesoil. The amount of mineral substances which water carries away to the seas and oceanseach year is estimated at 3.5 billion tons. The displacement of soil and soil nutrients is
one of the reasons why the runoff of rainwater from land needs to be slowed and why
rivers should carry to the seas only those surpluses of water which do not "fit" into the
optimally saturated land and atmosphere.

12

NASA DAAC Study: Clouds in the Balance, 2001, http://nasadaacs.eos.nasa.gov/

15

2.3. The large water cycle
The large water cycle is the exchange of water between ocean and land. Evaporation
Approximately 550 thousand km3 of water evaporate each year into the from oceans
atmosphere. About 86% of the evaporation from the Earth's surface is andfrom the seas and oceans while about 14% is from land. Of the total precipitation
amount of atmospheric precipitation originating from this evaporation,
74% falls over the seas and oceans and 26% over land. From the above, it follows that theseas and oceans, through evaporation and precipitation, endow land with a certain volume
of water which travels by way of atmospheric thermodynamic flows a great distance overthe continents, where it then rains down (or falls in the form of snow).
Part of the water from precipitation is absorbed into the ground and, if it The balancereaches the groundwater table, is added to groundwater runoff (except of the large
for regions without groundwater runoff). Part of the water is used by water cycle
vegetation and part of it evaporates again. The remainder flows away via
surface runoff into the network of rivers and back to the seas and oceans. Thus the large
water cycle is completed. Under balanced conditions, the same volume of water flows
from the continents into the seas and oceans as fall on the continents from the world's
oceans in the form of precipitation. But even relatively small deviations from this state ofequilibrium can mean great problems on the continents, particularly if they are longer
term deviations and if they affect most river basins. If more water flows from thecontinents into the oceans than is transferred from ocean to land through precipitation, theland loses water and dries out. This occurs, for example, when humanity systematicallylowers the infiltration of rainwater into the soil through its activities (for example
deforestation, agricultural activities, urbanization) and channels this water (in thequickest possible way) into rivers and subsequently into the sea. The moisture of the soil
decreases, the groundwater table falls, vegetation withers and less evaporation takes
place. If the volume of water flowing from continents to the seas and oceans increases
and evaporation of water from the seas and oceans remains unchanged, or does notincrease adequately (under the influence of increased evaporation due to global
warming), then the increased flow of water from the continents (including the increased
melting of glaciers) adds to the rise in ocean levels.
Besides the changes in the global water balance which are caused byandphenomena beyond the influence of mankind (solar cycles, changes in Humanother
position of the Earth in relation to the Sun, volcanic activity...), man influences
unconsciously causes further deviations, thus contributing through his
activities to the desertification of the continents. Through conscious
activity in the opposite direction, however—namely the deliberate conservation of wateron the continents—mankind could stop this ongoing desertification and return the lost
water to the continents.

16

2.4 The small water cycle
The small water cycle is a closed circulation of water in which water Definition andevaporated on land falls in the form of precipitation over this same characteristics
terrestrial environment. Just as a small water cycle exists over land,
there is also a small water cycle over the seas and oceans. Mutualinteractions take place between the individual small water cycles
because these occur in space and time over large areas with different morphologies andsurfaces with varying levels of moisture and surface water. The circulation of water in thesmall water cycle, then, is partially horizontal, but unlike that of the large water cycle,
vertical movement is the most characteristic. Evaporation from adjacent areas withdifferent temperatures mutually concur in the creation and development of cloud cover.
Perhaps it can also be said that above land water circulates at the same time in manysmall water cycles which are subsidized with water from the large water cycle.
The name of the small water cycle is not to its advantage because it
Evaporation
gives the impression that the cycle contains only a small amount of from land andwater. The opposite is true. Let's look at the information in the previous rainfall
chapter from a slightly different angle. The average annual precipitation
over land is 720 mm and the input from the seas is about 310 mm. From
this information it follows that land provides the larger part of its own precipitation (410mm) from its own land-based evaporation. The precipitation in a region shares in thesaturation of soil with rainwater, and through the small water cycle, roughly one-half to
two-thirds of rainwater (50 to 65%) goes into the repeated creation of precipitation overland. This is very important information which should fundamentally change our current
approach to the management of water in river basins. Mankind cannot transform anddrain the land limitlessly without also having an impact on its precipitation and its
thermal regime. If we want to have stabile precipitation over the land, it is very important
to ensure evaporation from the same land. Evaporation from land is, with a certain
simplicity (ignoring accumulation), the difference between precipitation and runoff. If wehave a great outflow of water from a territory, this will be to the detriment of evaporation
and will cause a subsequent decrease in precipitation. The volume of water in the small
water cycle over land will gradually decrease. With a decrease in runoff, on the other
hand, we get greater evaporation and thus we actually "sow the rain."
The small water cycle, also the short or closed water cycle, isThecharacteristic for a hydrologically healthy country. In a country circulation ofsaturated with water and water vapor, water circulates in small water onamounts and for relatively short distances.13 This occurs thanks to healthy landa water-vapor induced moderating of the differences in temperatures
between day and night or between localities with different thermal regimes. The majorityof water that evaporates condenses again in the given region or its surroundings. Frequent
and regular local precipitation retrospectively maintains a higher level of groundwater
13

Below, the one- to three-kilometer boundary layer of the atmosphere is in this context the mostsignificant. Turbulent flows of moisture, warmth and locomotion run there and over 75% of all water vapor
in the atmosphere is found there (Prof. Lapin).

17

and with it also vegetation and further evaporation, so that the whole cycle can be
repeated again and again.
If, however, there is an extensive disruption of vegetation cover (for Disintegration
example, by deforestation, agricultural activities, urbanization), solar of the waterenergy falls on an area with low evapotranspiration and a great part of cycle
it is changed into heat. This leads to a significant divergence oftemperatures, and the differences in temperatures between day and night or between
localities with other thermal regimes increase. Air currents increase, water vapor is taken
further away by the warm air and the majority of evaporated water is lost from a country.
Light and frequent precipitation decreases, and there is an increase in intense and lessfrequent precipitation from the seas. The cycle is opened and the large water cycle,
which, unlike the "soft" small water cycle, is characterized by erosion and the washingaway of soil nutrients into the sea, begins to predominate. The renewal of the dominationof the small water cycle, which is advantageous for humanity, vegetation and the land,
depends on the renewal of the functional plant cover of a territory and water surfaces in acountry.

2.5 The balance of the water cycle
The expression "water balance" is understood in hydrology to be a A balanced
relation which characterizes the circulation of water in a certain system, equation
mainly in a watershed or in its parts. We express it with equations like(1), which show the relationship between elements entering a system(for example, precipitation) and elements leaving a system (for example, evaporation andsurface or underground runoff). A third, neglected element exists between the entry andrunoff of water and that is the change in the volume of water in a system.
Monitoring the water balance of a territory is one of the basic tasks of Monitoring ofhydrology and meteorology. Such monitoring consists predominantly of the water
regularly measuring total precipitation and flow rates of water in balancewatercourses through a network of precipitation measuring stations andlimnographic stations for selected profiles of watercourses, particularly during theiroutfall to larger basins, to the waters of neighboring states and to the seas or oceans. In
the scope of a meteorological and climatological network, attention is paid, in addition tothese parameters of water balance, to the temperatures in a territory, levels ofgroundwater and the quality of the water.
Workers from professional institutes subsequently process data obtained Mathematicalfrom long-term measurement into a long-term series which helps them modeling ofmonitor the current development and trends of the measured quantities. the climate
On the basis of different models and results of known data, they createmodels for the development of these quantities with an eye on the future. Climatology isdedicated to such modeling. A common area for us is perhaps the most well-known
modeling of the development of weather by meteorologists, although their models are18

built on a different principle. A forecasting service is able, with reasonable accuracy, tomodel weather one, two, three, even ten days in advance. Climatologists, however, modelthe development of a climate a number of years or even decades in advance.
A necessary, though not sufficient condition for a stable climate in A conditiona territory is a stable water cycle (Fig. 2). That's why a very important for thepiece of information, which should be the primary purpose for stability ofmonitoring the water balance, is the difference between the amount of the climate
water which enters into a system and the amount of water which exits
from a system. This difference, when positive, indicates to us the addition of water to asystem (saturation), and when negative, the loss of water from a system (dehydration).
Most models of weather or climate don't really provide this information, however,
because they do not calculate it or they do not consider it significant.
Amongst both the general public and experts the established notion A non-zeroprevails that this difference is, for large units (such as river basins or balance
whole continents) and for long periods of time (a year or more), equal tozero, or around zero. The conviction that the amount of rain the wind brings from the sea
is the same amount of water that flows in rivers to the seas is a legacy of the times whenhydrologists first discovered the water cycle. They thus explained an old puzzle: how it ispossible that the levels of the seas and oceans do not rise when all the rivers of the world
constantly flow into them. Today, however, hydrological measurement shows that thelevels of the seas and oceans are rising and at the same time the levels of groundwater are
falling, and yet it doesn't seem to have occurred to anyone that the balance between the
inflowing and outflowing water cannot be zero. The great danger of neglect threatens justwhen this difference is very small and yet still on the same side of the equation. In such acase it can lead to the drying of a country over whole decades without hydrologists evernoticing the reason for it.
Within the scope of hydrology, meteorology and climatology, the Quantificationwater balance of a state and the water balance of the main watersheds on the level ofin the framework of the state have so far only been monitored on the microlevel of individual countries. The bigger the system, the easier it is to watersheds
overlook the dangerous one-sided deviation mentioned in the previous
paragraph. If, then, we want to analyse a territory effectively, we need to quantify its
water balance even on lower levels – on the regional or local level (community or town)
or still lower, in which, depending on the size and character of the investigated territory,
the ratio of runoff to precipitation can be mutually differentiated (Tab. 3). As we shalllater see, the quantification of the water balance can also be necessary on a personal levelin the area of land ownership, for example for the proposal of volumes needed for
rainwater harvesting on a plot of land.

19Fig. 1 The large and small water cycles on land

Fig. 2 Diagram of the long-term stable water cycle on land20

Equation for water balance in a watershed
R = E + Q + ∆V
(1)[+1 % –1 %] – minute changes Q and ∆V
in the annual water balance of awatershed
R – precipitation total over an area (per year), E – evaporation from a region (peryear), Q – surface and subsurface runoff (per year), ∆V – change in the amount ofwater in the system (per year) +1 % – relatively small increase in the volume ofrunoff versus the normal level initiated by the increase of runoff of rainwater from a
region for the current calendar year (not observable during the current research); –1% – relatively small decrease of supplied water to the soil profile and subsoil
compared to the normal level initiated by the increase of runoff of rainwater from a
region for the current calendar year;
A volume of 1% can be used, for the purpose of explaining the problem, as anaverage value of the decrease in groundwater and the speeding up of surface runoff
for a normal calendar year during the 20th century. This value approaches zero if it
applies to natural land untouched and unchanged by mankind. This value can begreater than 1 in highly urbanized areas with complete drainage of rainwater into
watercourses. If we multiply the amount of water corresponding to this percentage,
whatever it may be, by the number of years (for example 100 years; we can consider
the 20th century as a reference period) we ascertain that this is a considerable amountof water which the land has lost (particularly in the soil profile). Part of this volume at
the same time increased in the oceans (after subtracting the increased evaporationfrom the ocean levels) and along with water from melting glaciers, contributed to therise in their levels.

21

Tab. 3 Examples of water balance depending on the size of the studied territory14
Water balance of the investigated territory

Oceans and seas (area 361,455,000 km2)
– evaporation of water from the oceans– precipitation over the oceans– inflow
Continent – example: Europe (10,382,000 km2)
– amount of precipitation– infiltration and evaporation– outflow
Nation – example: Slovakia (49,035 km2)
– average amount of precipitation at present– infiltration and evaporation– outflow
River basin – example: Torysa river basin, Slovakia(area 1,349 km2)
– average amount of precipitation at present i– infiltration and evaporation– outflow
Urban area – example: area within city limits of Prešov(19.5 km2)
– average amount of precipitation at present– infiltration and evaporation– outflow
Plot of land – example: field measuring 0.8 km2– average amount of precipitation at present– infiltration and evaporation– outflow
Object – example: residential home with an asphalt
driveway (1,217 m2)– average amount of precipitation at present– infiltration and evaporation– outflow

Amount(mm/
year)

Volume ofwater
circulating

1 180
1 070
110

425 000 km3

750
480
270

7 790 km3
4 980 km3
2 810 km3

762
500
262

37 km340 000 km3

3 km3

628
173
455

0,012 km3,
t. j. 12 mil. m3

630
151
479

36 %

34 %

681
454
227

630
397
233

Share ofdrainagefrom the
total

33 %

72 %

504 000 m3
37 %766 m376 %14

Source of initial data: Slovak Hydrometeorology Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia; Large Atlas of theWorld, Kartografie Praha, Prague, 2000; O. Majerčáková, P. Šťastný: "The Hydrological Cycle".
Environment, Edition 35, number 3, pg. 123, Insititute of Land Ecology, 2001; Study "Integrated Protectionof Water in Prešov", People and Water, 200722

3 THE ROLE OF PLANTS IN THE CIRCULATION OF
WATER AND IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOLAR
ENERGYMay I each day take a wandering walk along banks beside water. May my soul rest on
the branches of trees I planted myself. May I refresh myself in the shadow of my own fig
tree.
Inscription on an Egyptian tombstone, cca 1400 years before Christ

All praise be yours, my Lord, through all that you have made, And first my lord BrotherSun, Who brings the day and the light you give to us through him…
All praise be yours, my Lord , through Brothers Wind and Air, and fair and stormy, all
the weather's moods, by which you cherish all that you have made.
All praise be yours, my Lord, through Sister Water, So useful, humble, precious andpure…
All praise be yours, my Lord, through Sister Earth our mother, who feeds us in her
sovereignty and bears various fruits and coloured flowers and herbs…
St. Francis of Assisi, Song of Creation

This chapter begins by dealing with "fire," the imaginary opposite of water, specificallywith the distribution of solar energy on land. It draws attention to the significant role ofwater and with it the power of vegetation for tempering the burning effects of the sun. It
demonstrates the fact that the roles of water and vegetation have in the concept of thegreenhouse effect and global climate change been thus far greatly neglected. It focusesalso on the possibility of alleviating the effect of climate change by improving
management of water and vegetation.

3.1 The flow and distribution of solar energy on land
The philosopher Heraclitus of Epheseus, living at the turn of the sixth and fifth centuries
before Christ, according to some ancient fragments considered fire as the prime matter ofthe world. A little later, Anaxagoras conjectured that the Sun was a giant Ideas about
flaming ball of metal, larger than the Peloponnese. For this he suffered the suncondemnation and banishment from Athens. If we were to figuratively

23

identify fire with the Sun in the first case and if we were to take into consideration thepsychological difficulties of the contemporaries of Anaxagora with the physical natureand the size of the Sun, these two philosophers would probably be two of the ancientauthors who came nearest to today's knowledge that the Sun contains 98% of all mass inour solar system. Some 1.3 million Earths could be placed within the Sun.
The sun is the primary source of energy for Earth. For approximately five billion years
now, it has illuminated daytime on our planet, doing so thanks to the nuclear fusion in its
interior, which transforms light hydrogen into helium. The Sun annually
Energy fromsends about 180,000 teraWatts (TW) of energy to Earth in the form of solar
electromagnetic radiation. Only for the purpose of comparison: the radiation
amount of energy which the whole of humanity uses for driving its
economy is approximately 14 TW annually. About 1.4 kW of energy falls on each square
meter of the outer surface of Earth's atmosphere (the solar constant). Solar energy keeps
the atmosphere in a gaseous state, warms our planet to a temperature favorable for life,
keeps the circulation of water in motion and provides energy for photosynthesis and otherlife processes. The energy concealed in fossil fuels also has its origin in solar energy inthe transformation by photosynthesis of plants in the long distant past.
Of the total amount of solar energy which reaches the Earth, about 30% Solaron average is reflected back into space in the form of shortwave radiation inradiation, 47% radiates as longwave (thermal) radiation and 23% is theconsumed in the circulation of water for evaporation. Upon passing atmospherethrough the atmosphere, solar radiation is partially absorbed by gases
and water vapor as well as being absorbed and reflected by powdery particles andaerosols. The energy of the radiation in the ultraviolet zone decreases, while the share of
longwave (thermal) radiation increases. The solar radiation that falls on the Earth's
surface consists of two components: direct and diffuse radiation. Direct radiation forms
parallel rays which arrive directly from the Sun (they form shadows), or are refracted
upon passing through the atmosphere. Diffuse radiation originates with the dissipation inatmospheric gases, clouds, powdery particles, aerosols and other impurities. Both of thesecomponents are present in daily sunlight, but their proportion frequently and very
markedly changes.
The amount of solar radiation which reaches the surface of the earth Solarvaries considerably in time and space. Solar radiation reaches the radiation
surface of the earth in daily and seasonal pulses.15 The maximum value reaching theof the radiation which arrives per square meter per year can reach 3000 Earth's
kWh. In the temperate zones of our geographic surroundings, the annual surface
input of solar radiation reaches a value of about 1100 kWh/m2. The amount of solar
energy which falls on the Earth's surface is determined by the weather at any given time.
The difference in the amount of solar energy reaching the Earth's surface on days of clear
and on days of overcast skies is formidable (see Fig. 3a, b).

15

The values of solar radiation in different places on Earth can be found on the webpages of NASA(http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/sse)

24

The distribution of solar energy depends also on the character of theAlbedoterrestrial surface. Incoming solar radiation is partially reflected (albedo
expresses the ratio of reflected radiation out of total radiation). The
amount of reflected radiation depends on its wavelength, on the angle of its fall and on
the character of the surface. Vegetation reflects 5-15% of shortwave solar radiation; a dry
surface reflects up to 35% of the radiation falling on it while freshly fallen snow reflects
up to 90% of solar radiation.
The fate of incoming solar energy depends significantly on the presenceof water in an ecosystem, which strongly influences the distribution of Sensible andlatent heat
energy between the two primary flows of heat: sensible and latent heat.
As the name itself suggests, sensible heat is accompanied by an increase in thetemperature of substances or bodies which we can feel. Latent heat is not accompanied
by any increase in temperature. Latent heat, in our case the latent heat of vaporization ofwater, is the amount of energy which water must receive in order to turn into vapor of thesame temperature. Let us refresh our school knowledge of physics: evaporation from thefree surface of a liquid takes place at every temperature, the intensity of this evaporation
increasing with the temperature of the liquid, with the size of its free surface and with theremoval of the vapor formed above the liquid. At boiling point, liquid evaporates not only
on the surface, but also from the interior as well. The specific latent heat (that is, thelatent heat per unit of mass) of water under normal pressure and at a temperature of 25 °C
is 2243.7 kJ/kg. This indicates the amount of solar energy which is consumed toevaporate each liter of water without increasing the temperature (This same amount ofheat is released later during condensaton of the water vapor in a colder place.).
Of course, water can change into water vapor only if it is present on
Water on land
land. If it is not present, a great part of the solar energy is changed into and heatsensible heat and the temperature of the environment sharply
increases. Whereas in a parched country up to 60% of solar radiation
changes into sensible heat, in a country saturated with water up to 80% of pure radiation
can be bound to the latent heat of the vaporization of water and only a very small portionof solar radiation is changed into sensible heat (Fig. 4).

3.2 Flora, water and the distribution of heat
At the conclusion of the previous chapter we stated that thefundamental difference between drained land and land saturated withwater rests on the way solar energy is dissipated, namely in its
transformation into other forms of energy. From this fact it follows
that terrestrial ecosystems can through active regulation of water

Water and thedissipation ofenergy25

currents significantly influence the distribution of solar energy into two main
components: sensible and latent heat. The primary importance of vegetation on land forthe climate is in its influence on the transformation of solar radiation.16
The distribution of solar energy reaching vegetation is represented in The
Fig. 5. Solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface is partly reflected; distribution
unreflected radiation is called net radiation. This radiation is partially of energy intranformed (dissipates) through the evaporation of water, is partially florachanged into sensible heat, partially conducted away as heat to the soil
and is partially accumulated in the biomass via photosynthesis. The amount of energy
accumulated in biomass is relatively low, with the net production of 1 kg of biomass per
square meter representing about 0.45% of the annual input of total solar energy persquare meter. The amount of biomass produced in the course of one year (annual primary
production) varies greatly between different places on Earth according to the amount of
the sun's rays arriving, the stocks of water and the accessibility of nutrients. Generally,
the more solar energy there is, the higher the potential production. With the increase in
input of solar energy, water becomes the main limiting factor in primary production.
The majority of living plants contain a great deal of water in their
Evaporation
tissues, with growing biomass containing up to 80-90% water. At the andsame time, water is also bound to growing tissues through the intake and transpiration
photosynthetic fixation of carbon dioxide (CO2). For a 10g daily growth of plantsof dry matter per m2, roughly 14g of CO2, 1g of nutrients and 80-90g ofwater are fixed to cell structures and plant tissues. Besides water for the building oftissues, we should also mention in connection with vegetation the consumption of waterfor evapotranspiration. Evaporation includes the vaporization of water from the soil orfrom the surfaces of plants. Transpiration is the release of water by plants in the form ofwater vapor. Plants constantly regulate the amount of water vapor released by the
opening and closing of a large number of pores, or stomata, under the surface of theirleaves. Together with providing shade, plants, given the right levels of incoming energy,
are able to cool and protect the soil, but particularly to optimalize amounts of water
which would otherwise very quickly evaporate from the soil and atmosphere. It can besaid that the ground "sweats" through plants, with realistic values for evapotranspiration
per square meter in the conditions of the temperate climate zone reaching values of 3
litres per day, which represents a latent heat of 2.1 kWh (7.5 MJ). In the mentioned caseroughly 3.09 kg of water per m2 passes through the flora (Fig. 6).
Evapotranspiration is a dynamic process which depends primarily on the The different
input of energy and the accessibility of water, a process which increases abilities forwith the growth of inflowing energy (solar radiation, the supply of dry transpiration
air, wind). It has a high range of values from zero up to a maximum
value (potential evapotranspiration) at which up to 80% of the incoming solar energy isused in the evapotranspiration process. Plants differ greatly in their ability to16

Hutjes, R. W. A., Kabat, A., Running, S. W., Shuttleworth, W. J. et al. 1998. "Biospheric Aspects of theHydrological Cycle." Journal of Hydrology, 212 – 213: 1 – 2126

evaporate/transpire water. In the temperate zone, the transpiration of evergreens is in
general lower than the transpiration of deciduous trees. Wetlands vegetation has thehighest capacity for transpiration. On a sunny day in the temperate zone with sufficientwater available, natural flora achieves transpiration values of several mm (several litres
per square meter per day), values above 5 mm being considered high. Some plants, solong as they have sufficient water available, are able to evaporate in the course of a sunny
day more than 20 litres of water per square meter.17 On developed land,evapotranspiration on sunny days is mostly limited by a shortage of water, so that thevalues of actual transpiration are markedly lower than those of potential transpiration.
From this it is obvious that insufficient water also limits the primary production andcirculation of carbon.
Transpiring plants, especially trees, are thus the perfect airThe tree as an
conditioning system of the Earth. Let's imagine a large, independently air-conditioning
standing tree with a crown of about 10 meters in diameter. On the unit
crown of this tree, which has a surface area of 80 m2, there falls eachday about 450 kWh of solar energy (4-6 kWh/m2). Part of the solar
energy is reflected, part is absorbed by the soil and part is converted into heat. If such atree is well stocked with water, it evaporates (transpires) some 400 litres of water eachday. For the transformation of water from a liquid state into water vapor, 280 kWh isconsumed. This amount of energy thus represents the difference between the shadow of atree and the shadow of a parasol with the same diameter. In the course of a sunny day,then, such a tree cools with a power equal to 20-30 kW, power comparable to that ofmore than 10 air-conditioning units. The tree is at the same time “fuelled" only by solar
energy, is made of recyclable materials, requires a minimal amount of maintenance andemits water vapor that is regulated by millions of stomata which respond to the heat andhumidity of the surroundings. The main thing is that the solar energy bound up in water
vapor is carried away and is released upon its condensation in cool locations. It thusbalances temperature in time and space, unlike a refrigerator or air-conditioner, which
release heat into its nearby surroundings. A tree, unlike a refrigerator or air-conditioner,is also completely noiseless, absorbs noise and dust and binds CO2.
The cooling effect of plants caused by transpiration is apparent in Evaporation
figures 7, 8 and 9. The pictures in the infrared spectrum show that the moreleaves of the plants are, thanks to transpiration, visibly cooler than the effective thansurrounding soil (Fig. 7). The cooling effect of vegetation is also evident albedo
from the infrared photographs of the square and park in Třeboň (Fig. 8). The temperatureof the roofs and facades of homes exceeds 30°C, whereas the temperature of the trees in
the park is around 17°C. Vegetation actively cools through the evaporation of water.
Vegetation, particularly forests, has a darker color and thus a lower reflectance (albedo)
than most other surfaces (clay, sand, etc.). This difference in reflectance is sometimes
17

Kučerová, A., Pokorný, J., Radoux, M., Němcová, M., Cadelli, D., Dušek, J. (2001). "Evapotranspirationof small-scale constructed wetlands planted with ligneous species." In: Vymazal, J. (ed.): Transformationsof Nutrients in Natural and Constructed Wetlands, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, s. 413 –427

27

interpreted as meaning that forests warm the Earth's surface. From figure 8, it is obviousthat plants, independently of reflectance, cool through transpiration. Figure 8 again
shows that the effect of reflectance is much lower in comparison with the effects oftranspiration.
A useful tool for judging the state of vegetation and its function during The influence
the distribution of solar energy over large areas is to take satellite of water on
photographs. Figure 9 shows photographs of the Mostecka (northern land
Czech Republic) and Třeboňsko (southern Czech Republic) regions.18 temperature
Mostecko has been greatly affected by strip mining, vast areas of land
there having been drained of water. Conversely, in Třeboňsko more than 10% of the landis covered by ponds, and other wetlands have also been preserved here. Temperatures are
represented by colors: The highest temperatures are shown in red, orange and yellow,
whereas the lower temperatures are colored in green. The highest temperatures are inplaces without vegetation, particularly in the strip mines and dump areas in Mostecko.
The thermal amplitudes are evidently higher in Mostecko, in comparison with Třeboňsko,where the temperature differences are balanced out thanks to its higher humidity.

3.3 The impact of drainage and the removal of vegetation on therelease of heat
Large-scale draining and removing of vegetation is connected with the Changes inrelease of a colossal amount of heat and with the formation of so-called the flows of"hot plates" on land. Sensible heat released from just 10 km2 of drained colossal
land (a small town) for a sunny day is comparable with the installation amounts ofpower of all the power plants in the Slovak Republic (6,000 MW). A fall energy
in evaporation by 1 mm per day over the total area of the Slovak
Republic (49,000 km2) leads to release of sensible heat of around 35,000 GWh for one
sunny day. This is an amount of heat larger than the annual power production of all thepower plants in the Slovak Republic. The effect of human activities on the land is still not
fully appreciated. Drainage of developed land is accompanied by a drop in functional
vegetation. Under the influence of the negative impact of drainage and the loss ofpermanently functional vegetation on the rainfall regime and on the distribution oftemperatures,19 we have gradually become victims of degradation and desertification ofvast areas of once fertile land.
In recent years the problem of global warming has become a major topic
of discussion. The direct reason for climate change is at present
considered to be mankind's production of greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4,
N2O, hydrofluorocarbons). Ever more sophisticated models show the

Neglecting ofwater inmodels18

From the Landsat Thematic Mapper and Enhanced Thematic Mapper+ satellite
Ripl W., "Management of Water Cycle and Energy Flow for Ecosystem Control – The EnergyTransport-Reaction (ETR) Model," Ecological Modelling 78, 1995, pgs. 61 – 76; Ripl W., "Water: theBloodstream of the Biosphere". Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 358(1440), 2003, pgs. 1921 – 34
19

28

impact of the growth of concentrations of greenhouse gases. In view of the fact that thecirculation of water is very dynamic and complex, water as an important greenhouse gas
has been greatly neglected in these models, however. Water is considered to be a stablecomponent of the atmosphere. Reasons for changes in the water regime of a country are
difficult to show unequivocally, because they involve a complex of innumerable mutuallyconnected processes.
One measure of the impact of increased concentrations of greenhouse Drainage
gases is the so-called radiation effect, which expresses a change in the worse thanbalance between radiation entering into the system of the Earth's greenhouseatmosphere and radiation flowing out of this system. According to the gases
International Panel for Climate Change, global industrialization (theeffects of human activity) has caused, in comparison with the pre-industrial period,
warming with radiation effects equal to 1.6Wm2. This means that on average about
1.6Wm2 more energy falls per square meter of the Earth's surface than in about 1750.20 In
comparison with this value, the impact of a country’s water management on its climaticconditions is (at least on local level) appreciably larger.
The development of our climate in the future is perhaps difficult to Vegetation
envision, even though scientists are constantly discussing these for tempering
questions. It has become even more difficult to forecast the long-term climatic
trends in the weather in recent times; we meet with extreme changes
precipitation, extreme temperatures, and prolonged periods of drought.
One condition for the alleviating of climatic change is the renewal of those basic
ecological functions which are closely connected with the return of water and vegetation
to the land. The functions we particularly have in mind are the soft dissipation of solar
energy through the circulation of water, the absorption of carbon dioxide and the keepingof nutrients and substances on land. The return of vegetation and water to land can only
have a positive effect. With sensible management of water and vegetation we can curb
climatic change on the local level; if we can act in the same way across larger areas,
perhaps we can expect a tempering of global climate change.

20

IPCC, 200729

Fig. 3a, b Values of solar radiation on a clear day and on a cloudy day(recorded on 18 July 2006 and 3 August 2006, in Třeboň, Czech Republic)30

Fig. 4 The distribution of solar energy on drained land and on a landscape saturated
with water

Fig. 5 The distribution of solar energy on vegetation
Rg – global radiation, Rn – net radiation, a – albedo (reflected radiation), H – sensible
heat, L × E – latent heat x evapotranspiration (evaporation from soil and vegetation), s –flow of heat to the soil, B – accumulation of heat in the biomass, P – consumption ofenergy for photosynthesis

31

Fig. 6 An example of the daily energy balance of CO2 and H2O fluxes per 1 m2 ofvegetation stand: A: For the creation of 10g of dry matter, 48Wh (170kJ) are consumed
for the fixing of 14g CO2 (0.32 mol). B: Evapotranspiration (3 l) requires 2.1 kWh (7.5
MJ).

Fig. 7 Photographs of thin vegetation in the infrared spectrum and in the visible
spectrum. The bare surface of the ground is visibly warmer than the surface of the leaves
cooled by transpiration. (Třeboň, Czech Republic, 12 July 2002, 10:00 hrs).

32

Fig. 8 Photograph of the square and adjacent park in Třeboň, Czech Republic,
taken with a thermal camera
The differences in temperatures between the vegetation, facades and roofs of the houses
is visible.

Fig. 9 Comparison of the distribution of sensible heat in two different types of land
(Mostecko and Třeboňsko)The pond-covered Třeboňsko with wetlands shows a lower regional temperature
difference (right) than the drier land of Mostecka (a strip coal mining area), which has
insufficient vegetation (left).

33

4 THE IMPACT OF THE EXPLOITATION OF LAND ON
THE CIRCULATION OF WATERThe Slavonic countries stretch from the Mediterranean Sea through to the Northern
Seas... The Slavs build most of their own castles...on meadows rich in water andbushes...they reside in the most fertile lands, rich in different means of subsistence. They
till the soil very intensively to provide themselves with enough food... Famines caused bylong-term drought don't exist in [their] lands. On the contrary. Famine can break out
when it rains too much... If it rains only a little, they do not have poor results, because
these lands are damp...
Ibrahim Ibn Jacqub at-Turtushi, About the Western Slavs, middle of the 10th century 21
During the whole of its history, humanity has reshaped natural land into civilized land.
The land thus obtains a cultural memory of individual civilizations, nations andgenerations. This memory is expressed distinctively in the attitude of people towards
water. No civilization has ever trivialized the significance nor the need for water. Few,
however, have known how to adequately assess the consequences of their own behaviour
and create a method for reshaping the land in order to conserve water in the environment
and ensure its long-term abundance. From the perspective of shaping a land throughhuman activity and attitude towards water, we will now consider forested land,
agricultural and urban lands, as well as the bodies of water in them.

4.1 Forests
Deforestation is not a new phenomenon in human history and has Deforestation
probably been going on since the time mankind started using fire. As in prehistory
people began to live by hunting, fire could serve as an aid for scaring up
animals or for obtaining new living space or hunting grounds. With the development of
pasturage and agriculture, deforestation served as a way of obtaining new land for these
activities. With the development of the settled way of life, and even more, after the
replacement of the stone axe by the bronze one, wood became a material withmultipurpose uses: for building, for the production of working tools, weapons or boats
and last but not least, as an accessible fuel for burning, whether for heating, cooking or
for metalwork.
The negative consequences of deforestation in the form of erosion and Deforestation
flooding affected the oldest known civilizations, which consumed a in antiquity
great deal of wood. The oldest works of classical literature, such as the
Epic of Gilgamesh and the Bible, as well as ancient authors such as Herodotus, Plato,
Pliny, Strabo and others, all reflect these processes. Today it is difficult to believe that
21

Cited from the book: Slovakia through the Eyes of Foreigners, Sources of History of Slovakia andSlovaks II. Literary Information Center, Bratislava, 1999, pg. 242

34

great areas of the Middle East were, in the 3rd century before Christ, covered by thickcedar forests. They were, however, so devastated that Emperor Hadrian at the beginningof the 2nd century had to issue an order forbidding their felling. Wood from them wasused largely in massive building projects and for construction of Phoenician boats. Prior
to the development of agriculture, oak, beech, cedar and pine all grew in the
Mediterranean region. Now, though, only the cultivated olive, which ranks among themost drought-resistant trees because its roots can reach up to 10 metres deep, remains.
Some contemporary authors ultimately consider deforestation, with its consequentdegradation of the environment and loss of productivity of the land, as the reason for thefall of the Roman Empire. A similar situation to the one in the Mediterranean and Middle
East also arose in Afghanistan and in Central Asia. Civilization in the Indus Valley
collapsed after deforestation around the year 1400 BC.22
Europe to the north of the Roman Empire was almost entirely covered Deforestation
with thick forest, a fact that aroused astonishment and fear in the as the
Romans. The impenetrably thick forests were in their eyes home to expansion ofdangerous wild animals, inscrutable barbarians and goblins and were civilization
full of swamps and other unknown dangers. To the Romans’imagination, the forests became the exact opposite of civilized life in the town or thepeaceful peasant life in the fertile flood plains of rivers. The expansion of civilization,
therefore, became identified with deforestation. This idea, supported by economic
arguments, persisted even after the fall of the Western Roman Empire and was present
during the formation of Europe during the Middle Ages.23
According to preserved scraps of information, the old Slavs, prior to the The
acceptance of Christianity, envisaged the world as a gigantic tree. On top abundance ofof this tree lived Perun, the god of thunder and lightning, as well as forests fromweather. In many Slavic lands Perun was the highest of the gods and his the time ofworship was geographically the most widespread. We can only speculate the old Slavs
whether the saturation of the small water cycle, accompanied byfrequent local showers thanks to the gigantic retention of water of the forested land, wasthe result of the fact that Perun was placed on the highest point in the Slavonic pagan
pantheon. In any case, Perun's opposite and most serious antagonist was, according to
Slavonic mythology, the god Veles, who resided in the underground regions around theroots of the world tree and was associated with water, earth and dampness. Fromobservation of the rising mist from the forests, the image obviously emerged from ourancestors that Perun and Veles stole one another's water (and the sun). At the time of thearrival of Christian missionaries Saints Cyril and Method to the territory of Great
Moravia in 9th Century, forest covered about three-quarters of the territory of today's
Central Europe.
Deforestation, which was in Europe most intensive in the first half of thelast millennium and in the USA from the 17th to the 20th centuries,

Deforestationin the modernage

22

J. Pokorný, The Development of the Land Under the Influence of Humans, 2003
Felipe Fernandez-Armesto, Civilizations – Culture, Ambition and the Transformation of Nature, Simon& Schuster, ISBN 0-7432-0248-1, 2002
23

35

reached its peak in many developed countries in the 20th century. The overall global rateof deforestation of continents is at present, according to data from the FAO, more than
120,000 km2 per year. The total extent of deforestation of the continents is significantly
higher than the natural growth of new and native forests (with the exception of Europe
and the USA, where this trend has been stopped). A lowering in the quality of forest
vegetation is, for many reasons, also occurring. Old-growth/primeval forests, which
likewise face deforestation and the primacy of economic interests, have a special role in
the world’s ecosystem. Deforestation of land and the lowering of the quality of forest
vegetation is accompanied by an increase in the speed of the runoff of rainwater andwater from melting snow in the given areas, as well as the rapid erosion of soil. The
microclimatic conditions of areas are also changing.24 These phenomena, which have led
to the decline or extinction of numerous great civilizations in the past, are as aconsequence of the expanding technical possibilities of humanity today present
throughout the entire world.
Plato, in his unfinished work Critias, wrote about a war between the residents of Atlantis
and Athens-led inhabitants of the continent which had supposedly taken place 9000 years
prior to Plato's discussion. Alongside the idealized description of fabled Atlantis there isin the work such a rudely and realistically captured process of water erosion following
the devastation of the forests around Athens that one can't help getting the impressionthat Plato wrote about something he was seeing with his own eyes:"…The land was the best in the world… in those days the country was fair as now andyielded far more abundant produce… Many great deluges have taken place during the9000 years...and during all this time and through so many changes, there has never been
any considerable accumulation of the soil coming down from the mountains, as in otherplaces, but the earth has fallen away all round and sunk out of sight. What happened islike a body growing thin to the bone as a consequence of an illness. All the richer andsofter parts of the soil have fallen away, and there remains the mere skeleton of the land.
But in the primitive state of the country, its mountains were high hills covered with soil,
and the plains, as were full of rich earth. There was abundance of wood in the mountains.
Of this the last traces still remain. Although some of the mountains now only afford
sustenance to bees, not so very long ago there were still to be seen roofs of timber cut
from trees growing there, which were of a size sufficient to cover the largest houses; andthere were many other high trees, cultivated by man and bearing abundance of food for
cattle. Moreover, the land reaped the benefit of the annual rainfall, not as now losing thewater which flows off the bare earth into the sea, but, having an abundant supply in allplaces, and receiving it into herself and treasuring it up in the close clay soil, it let off
into the hollows the streams which it absorbed from the heights, providing everywhereabundant fountains and rivers, of which there may still be observed sacred memorials inplaces where fountains once existed; and this proves the truth of what I am saying…”

24

See, for example, Eneas Salati, Carlos A. Nobre, Possible climatic impacts of tropical deforestation,
Climatic Change, Volume 19, Numbers 1 – 2 / September, 1991

36

4.2 Agricultural land
One of the most important revolutions in human history was the change Neolithic
from the hunter-gatherer way of life to a life of agriculture and revolution
pasturage. The impetus for this changeover was clearly a global
warming of the climate after the end of the Ice Age. We can observe that, approximately
10,000 years ago in the Middle East (the region of the so-called "Fertile Crescent", thatis, the lands from the mouth of the Euphrates through the valley of the Jordan up to themouth of the Nile), China and sooner or later in other parts of the world, a more or lessspontaneous move towards the cultivation of agricultural crops and the rearing ofdomestic animals took place. Alluvial agriculture in the valleys of great rivers gradually
put a seal on the first great centers of civiliation, which were usually distinguished by ahigh level of organization, a network of irrigation and drainage canals, large-scale
agricultural production maximizing the utilization of the soil and cultivation of a small
number of crops which were not natural to the given land, i.e. crops which without thehelp of humans would not thrive.25 This Neolithic revolution, which from the viewpointof the whole of human existence took place not so very long ago, gradually createdthrough the ensuring of a food base the conditions for a whole range of civilizationalchanges such as greater population density, the establishing of larger population centers,
a division of labor, trade, the development of knowledge and so on.
Some edible seeds of grasses proved to be exceptionally suitable for Cultivation ofagricultural cultivation. Besides advantages such as rapid growth and cereal grains
simple cultivation, they above all provided valuable sources of energy
and could be stored easily. They became the basis for cultivation of grains which were to
become the most widespread crop for human nutrition. In Europe, but also in many otherparts of the world in the temperate climate zone, the cultivation of wheat and barley,
which we can assume were the first such domesticated crops, has dominated since thetimes of the Neolithic revolution. These have retained the traits of the annual steppe
grasses from which they were cultivated and therefore require steppe-like conditions togrow. The soil for their cultivation therefore has to be drained of water.
For their cultivation of grains, people drained agricultural land and over Climate
huge areas created a cultured steppe. With the change in the character of change
the land, the climate also changed,26 and where land had been drained ofwater, it became necessary to irrigate it again. Today we don’t know the reasons for the
drying of the climate over great regions and which occurred many times over in the firsthalf of the Holocene period. We cannot even exactly determine whether and possibly
what share ancient civilizations had in them.27 We don't know whether the draining of
25

Felipe Fernandez-Armesto, Civilizations – Culture, Ambition and the Transformation of Nature, pg.174

26

Virginia H. Dale, "The Relationship Between Land-Use Change and Climate Change," EcologicalApplications, 1996, pgs. 753 – 769
27
J.A. Dearing, "Climate-Human-Environment Interactions: Resolving Our Past," Cim. Past, 187 – 203,
2006

37

land was the primary reason for the extinction of some of these civilizations. We should,
however, keep this possibility in mind, because despite all the differences, we areprobably arriving at a similar process of the dehydrating of land, a process which has
results that we cannot know.28
The intensive cultivation of barley and wheat expanded from the Fertile Fate of the
Crescent to a wider world. Possibly the final act of their cultivation was Sumerians
written by the "discoverers of agriculture," i.e. the Sumerians, who lived
in southern Mesopotamia from the 4th to the early 2nd millennia before Christ. The
exceptionally successful nation of the Sumerians intensively cultivated, over great areasof land, monocultures of the mentioned crops along with other produce. Using a systemof canals, they brought water from the Euphrates and Tigris rivers, and using a system ofdrainage canals, carried it away. The soil, despoiled of natural vegetation and subjected toan annual cycle of irrigation and drainage, became salty and stopped producing yields.
The power of the Sumerians waned, their numbers decreased, the country became adesert and they were overcome by enemies and ultimately assimilated. Other great
civilizations founded on alluvial agriculture underwent a similar fate to that of theSumerians of Mesopotamia. In many of them we can witness over a period of two to fourthousand years a further decrease in levels of rainfall and subsequently the civilization’s
extinction or transformation.
The Middle Ages contributed to the development of agriculture, forexample by introducing the yoke, which allowed for deeper plowing and Further
revolutions ina change from dual crop rotation to triple crop rotation. Another agriculture
revolutionary change brought in a new age of agriculture: a boom innatural and artificial fertilizers, pesticides, specially bred plants which
achieve much higher yields, as well as a growth of mechanization which allowed for thetilling of much larger areas than in the past. The Green revolution in the middle of the20th century spread the technology used in the West across almost the entire world andhelped feed the rapidly growing number of people on the Earth. The Red revolution insocialist countries collectivized the small fields of small peasant farmers, plowed overboundaries and united plots of land into units of scores, even hundreds of hectares.
Gigantic fields with no natural barriers, field zones or protected bands of vegetation
limiting surface runoff from the land, were presented as great leaps forward (Fig. 10).
With the goal of maximizing the hectare yields of cultivated monocultures or disposable
tracts, extensive drainage using gravitation systems or pumping stations was carried out.
Additional irrigation of these fields is no substitute for the need to conserve rainwater on
the land, although it partially contributes to the return of the water drained from the land.
Thus, alongside the changes in microclimatic conditions (Fig. 11) onsuch agricultural land, the speed of the surface runoff of rainwater also
increased, as did the water-caused erosion associated with thedestruction and displacement of soil (Tab. 4), which led to the

Erosion,degradationand thecarrying
away of soil

28

See, for example, Deepak K. Ray et al., "Influence of Land Use on the Regional Climate of Southwest
Australia," 13th Symposium on Global Change and Climate Variations and 16th Conference on Hydrology,
2002 (http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/29880.pdf)

38

degradation of the quality and even the devastation of the land and the emergence ofdesolate ground. Of the mentioned processes, the most serious phenomenon is thedisplacement (loss) of soil. It seems, however, that the displacement of soil in our country
is among the least monitored of phenomena and that pedologists lag behind in researchjust as hydrologists lag behind in the monitoring of the decrease in water on the land.
And thus, there is no one to cause any commotion. While the creation of soil is tallied up
in the hundredth or even thousandths of millimetres annually, erosion runs rampant at a
rate many times greater.
In Slovakia the real loss of soil through water erosion runs on average in Soil erosion
the forested vegetation of the middle to upper mountain regions at about in Slovakia
0.01-0.03 mm/year, in permanent grasslands at around 0.06 mm/year, incereal fields at 1.8 mm/year, on bare ground above the tree line at 3.4mm/year and in root crop fields up to 3.6 mm/year.29 This means that in many regions of
Slovakia we lose precious agricultural soil which has been formed over centuries or evenmillennia. In view of the fact that soil is so slowly created, it can be considered as a nonrenewable resource. It can thus be said that we are living off our very foundations.
The urgency of measures needed to combat water-caused erosion Potential loss
become still more urgent with the view of potential (possible) water- of soil
caused erosion of the soil. This involves erosion which would occur
naturally on the surface of the soil if it were not protected by vegetation even withoutanti-erosion measures. The average intensity of such possible erosion represents in
Slovakia 2.3 mm each year (23 m³ of soil per hectare per year). Water erosion ofmoderately, strongly and extremely threatened agricultural soil in Slovakia represents
55.6% of all agricultural land in the national land fund. Moderately, strongly or verystrongly to catastrophically threatened forested land comprises up to 97.1% of all forested
land in the fund (Tab. 5).30 From the comparison of data about real and potential watercaused erosion in forests, it becomes imperative to maintain forestation to the extent thatconditions allow. A further conclusion should be the need for urgent forestation,
particularly of desolate lands, which would allow for the fulfilling of the anti-erosion andhydric functions of the forest on them.

29

Rudolf MIDRIAK, "From Threats of Erosion to the Desolation of the Soil in Slovakia," Third Soil
Science Days in the SR, VÚPOP Bratislava, 2004, p. 193 – 200
30
ibid.

39

Tab. 4 Actual water-caused erosion of agricultural soil31
Level of erosion

Linkeš, et al. (1997)(thous. ha)
1 198
514
49
24
1 785 thous. ha(73.1 % PPF)

Low erosion
Moderate erosion
High erosion
Extremely high erosion
Total

Environment Ministry SR (2002)(% PPF)47222
1
72% PPF

Tab. 5 Erosion threatening soil according to the type of land in Slovakia under the
influence of surface runoff of water (potential water erosion)32
Threat oferosion(degree)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

minuteweak
moderatestrongvery strong
catastrophic

Average / total

Intensity of potential
erosion (bearingaway) of soil

Agricultural land

Forested land

(mm per year)(thous. ha)(%)

up to 0.05
0.06 – 0.50
0.51 – 1.50
1.51 – 5.00
5.01 – 15.00
over 15.00

107
1 296
823
783
100
1

3.4
41.7
26.5
25.2
3.2
0.0

(thous.
ha)
3
117
333
1 075
255
1

63.5

1 784

36.5

2.30

3 110

(%)

0.0
6.6
18.7
60.3
14.4
0.0

Total

(thou
s. ha)
110
1 413
1 156
1 858
355
2

(%)

4 894

100.0

2.2
28.9
23.6
38.0
7.3
0.0

"More things have changed in the memories of the oldest living people in our country
today than in the previous one thousand years. In our time, in the past 75 years, it isbusinesses that purport to improve our lives which are responsible for these changes.
They are draining the soil and in so doing, damaging its chemical solutions. The fact that
fens, old branches of rivers, swamps and high places on uplands are all being drained ofwater is contibuting to a change in our climate, with a greater contrast between severe
winters and summers with fewer clouds and isolated periods of drought and flooding.
The fact that these improvements allow the peasants to plough up any pasturage anddrained bottomland, means that layers of topsoil are being uncovered and washed away,with no new topsoil being created in its place.“
Vladimír Úlehla,33 1947

31

Rudolf MIDRIAK, "From Threats of Erosion to the Desolation of the Soil in Slovakia."
ibid.
33
Cited from the publication Míchal I. Ecological Stability. Veronica, Brno, 1994, s. 200
3240

4.3 Bodies of waterAs was mentioned in the previous chapter, the greatest human Hydrauliccivilizations which led humanity out of the Stone Age into antiquity civilizations
originated along the Nile, the Euphrates and Tigris, the Indus, theYellow Rivers and others. These civilizations are sometimes called "hydrauliccivilizations,"34 because their alluvial agriculture depended on watercourses andextensive networks of canals, which besides the function of transportation, had theparticular task of bringing and taking away water during regular annual floods. Surface
water was a key for irrigation, coming once each year and taking the place of missing
rainwater.
These civilizations were thus, from a climatic-agricultural point of view,completely different from that of our ancestors after their arrival in Initially otherCentral Europe, where, thanks to a high degree of forestation, rain fell conditions
here
frequently. The ability of the land to retain water was furthermore sohigh, that according to testimony of the Spanish trader Ibrahim Ibn Jacqub at-Turtushi
from the middle of the 10th century, even in those cases, "if it rains only a little, they do
not have poor results, because these lands are damp." For a view of the countryside in
our area, we can, to a certain extent, form an image from period landscape paintings
hanging in galleries. Landscapes from the 19th century show a wealth of surface water in
unregulated rivers gushing out into wide riverbeds, their lush plant life suggesting aliving communication with the groundwater. If Romanticism was to come back into
fashion today, it would struggle to find similar scenery to depict.
In the time of expansion of agricultural development, settlements andPressure forindustrial sites moved nearer to watercourses, a fact which led to a fear the altering ofof flooding. Along with this came the need for agriculture to expand watercourses
cultivated areas. During the development of transportation it wasnecessary to crisscross flows of water. The need to use water currents more intensively
for transportation purposes also arose, hence the need to start making alterations andregulations of rivers (Fig. 12). The alteration of water flows usually entailed shortening
their total length (many naturally blindly meander), reinforcing the banks and the bottoms
of watercourses and raising levees alongside them. Many adjacent fens and swamps
which were connected with river ecosystems were also drained. Many bottomlands which
had once served for the meandering of watercourses or for the spillage of water outside ofriverbeds during increased periods of rainfall were built over, and the original body ofwater was now given a precisely determined place and cross-section profile. We should
add to this that often the problem of flood protection has been misunderstood, the mere
raising of banks or protective levees and the deepening or enlarging of the watercourse’s
cross-section profile for better drainage of flood waves in a given community not always
being the solutions they seem. This is because the performing of such alterations without
judging the context of the entire river basin and territory only raises the risk of floods incommunities and towns which are located further downstream.
34

According to the book by Karl A. Wittfogela Oriental Despotism (1957).

41

The primary negative effect of the mentioned modifications was the Acceleration
acceleration of the runoff of water from the land and the lowering of the of runoff ofland's ability to retain water. The mentioned "civilizational" alterations water fromof watercourses contributed to a gradual decrease in the amount of water landin the water cycle and disproportionately decreased the relative headstart our country had in comparison with others, which were not blessed with suchfavourable climatic conditions and an abundance of water. In the end, large waterworks
like dams, which in the recent past were built for the utilization of water energy, thetransformation of flood waves or the creation of reserves of drinking water, are according
to research paradoxically less effective from the viewpoint of conserving water on land
than a large number of smaller reservoirs with the same total volume.35

4.4 Towns
As we have already mentioned, one of the most important revolutions in The urban
human history was the Neolithic agricultural revolution. In both revolution
significance and time this is followed by the urban revolution. The
emergence of towns and city states is one of the milestones in the transition fromprehistoric to historic times for humanity. We know of towns like the biblical Jericho(and some others) whose existence goes right back to prehistoric times. However, cities
with all the attributes that differentiate them from mere settlements, not only in their
number of citizens but also in the organization of life (for example, keeping written
records about its administration), date, according to current knowledge, from the times of
the Sumerians in the period from 3100 to 2900 BC in lower Mesopotamia. Almost at thesame time, towns began to emerge in Egypt and in the valley of the River Indus. Many
authors give the need for a high level of organization arising from the challenge of
implementing alluvial agriculture as one of the reasons for the emergence of cities in theso-called "cradles of civilization." The detailed reasons for the emergence of ancient
cities, their attributes and the cause of their extinction are not subjects for this publication
to address, however.
Cities enormously speeded up the development of civilization—both forgood and for bad. At this time let us briefly focus our attention on an The
achievement
exceptional achievement which emerged during the first urban of sewerage
revolution and which was destined later to make a return: the seweragesystem. The ancient towns of Harappa, Mohenjo-daro and Rakhigarhi in the Indus valley(present day Pakistan) are the first known cities in the world to build a city seweragesystem, and they did so 2600 years before Christ. The sewerage system was covered,walled, bordered the streets and was connected to private homes and public buildings,
and last but not least, to baths and flushing toilets. The overwhelming majority ofcountries in the world had to wait until the second urban revolution, practically until our
own times, for their own systems.
35

Brad Lancaster, Rainwater Harvesting for Drylands, Vol. I., Rainsource Press, Tucson, Arizona, ISBN 09772464-0-X, 2006

42

History sometimes repeats itself, but according to Heraclitus we can
The second
never step into the same river twice. The second urban revolution is urban
associated with an industrial revolution. The start of the industrial revolution
revolution, the end of slavery and serfdom as well as the development ofa market environment, allowed the free movement of people and enabled a more dynamic
movement of the workforce. This period of growth and economic prosperity was also thebeginning of new global growth in the world population, which since the year 1800 has
grown six-fold to today's population of more than 6 billion people. It was also a period of
migration from villages to towns, of an increase in the share of people living in cities
versus villages, as well as a shift in the mentality and values of people from the village tothe city—sometimes for good and sometimes for bad. This process, which lasted a longtime in Western Europe and in North America, is especially visible in the second half ofthe 19th century. In Slovakia, the process of urbanization with all its attendant attributes
began about 100 years later and occurred more intensively, de facto within the life of one
generation. The percentage of urban dwellers between 1960 and 1990 in Slovakia
increased from 30% to 56% (where it approximately remains today), but did not reach thesame levels as in Western Europe.
The details of the second, or even the third urban revolution, associatedImpermeablewith urban decentralization and with the emergence of post-industrial surfaces andsociety, are not the subject of this publication, but we want to again the sluicing
focus on sewerage. Our modern cities, and increasingly our villages, too, away of water
unlike the cities of the old Sumerians, have their own sewerage systems(Fig. 13). Furthermore, unlike the old cities from the Indus valley, other cities of
antiquity, the Middle Ages and the larger part of modern times, our modern cities andmore and more villages, are paved and their surfaces are reinforced with impermeable
materials.36 The development of technology allowed for the invention of ingenious andpowerful building machines and mechanisms which were able to shape the surface of theland for the construction of buildings, roads and other requirements of modern life more
quickly than at any time in the past. The mass use of cement and asphalt began to
predominate in the building of cities and the transformation of rural environments into
urban ones (Fig. 14, 15). The shortage of space and the need for comfort caused rainfall
over cities or urban spaces to be perceived as a kind of burden. So, rainwater began to beperceived more as wastewater, which is carried away by public sewerage, in most cases
along with sewage water.
So now nearly all rainwater from the cities of Europe is carried to rivers Giantand eventually to the seas from paved and roofed areas by rainwater volumes ofsewers. According to estimates, more than 20 billion m3 of rainwater are water sluiced
sluiced away each year from the European continent. Over the past 50 away
years, then, more than 1000 billion m3—that is, 1000 km3—of rainwater,which in the past saturated the ecosystem and soil, filled out the stocks of groundwater,

36

Sid Perkins, "Paved Paradise? Impervious Surfaces Affect a Region's Hydrology, Ecosystems – Even its
Climate," Science News, week of Sept. 4, 2004; Vol. 166, No. 10 , p. 152

43

replenished springs and through its evaporation, moistened the climate, has been sluiced
away from the European continent. Last but not least, the rapid runoff from paved urban
environments with sewerage systems contributes to the higher occurrences of flooding
threatening populations downstream. The most serious fact, however, is that, for a longtime, we have been draining the environment in which we live. We are causing a longterm drop in groundwater supplies beneath our paved and roofed surfaces; we are causinga growth in temperatures in city structures, a fall in atmospheric humidity, a start ofcivilizational diseases typical for urban environments and a worsening of the quality of
our environment as a whole.
Added to the multiple effects of cities, it is also necessary to consider theThedrawing of water from the ground for the purposes of drinking and other dissipation offunctions, all of which have a great cumulative effect. This drawing of water inwater goes on without ensuring the adequate return of water gained from towns
territory back into the land. The water instead runs out into the sea afteruse. Cities which profligately and expensively let millions of cubic metres of rainwaterflow into their sewerage systems will later face worsening shortages of drinking andutility water, shortages which in many cases will become chronic. Insufficient drinking
water is thus not only a problem of poor but also of prosperous cities. Obviously, cities indeveloping countries have their own particularities. The poorer parts of cities in many
developing countries are permanently dependent on wood for uses such as fuel and thus
the forests in their surroundings are systematically cut down.
Drainage and deforestation lead to the fact that towns, while growing, Change ofchange the microclimatic conditions of the original territory. They are climatic
becoming urban hot islands over which a hot climatic umbrella is conditions
growing (Fig. 16). These "islands" are slowly but surely changing theflow of clouds and the movement of winds over their territory and in their surroundings.
Particularly in the summer, they push precipitation to the cooler mountain regions, whichconsequently increases the risk of extreme torrential rains in the mountain regions andfloods which threaten mountain valleys as well as populations in the lowlands
downstream on rivers. And here we have a much more direct and logical cause forclimate changes and the rising extremes of weather than the impact of a 30 percent
growth in the fractional content of CO2 in the air over the past 150 years.
More than half of the Earth’s inhabitants live today in cities, a share of Water
the population which will continue to grow significantly. Cities have management
become a kind of new-age factory of economic prosperity which slowly is
and gradually absorb their surroundings.37 Thus mankind, through unsustainable
developing land for agriculture and other human activities, has now"claimed for itself" more than 40% of the area of all continents. It's necessary toemphasize that a solution for the problems mentioned in this text exists and that
population growth in itself is not in conflict with permanently sustainable development.
Instead, what is in conflict with permanently sustainable development is the present
method of managing water on land.
37

Urban Sprawl in Europe - The Ignored Challenge, ISBN 92-9167-887-2, EEA Report No. 10/2006

44

Fig. 10 Agricultural land beneath the Tatra Mountains
Giant fields that originated during communist era with the collectivizing of tracts of land.
Due to the absence of barriers, rapid surface runoff causes water erosion of the soil.

Fig. 11 The daily course of temperatures on the surface of soil on a drained andmowed meadow and on a natural bottomland meadow

45

Fig. 12 Alteration of the Latorica River in the 1960s
This was a component of the program of drainage of the eastern Slovakia lowlands.38

Fig. 13 The sluicing away rainwater
The original aim of owners was to achieve "dryness and warmth". The fulfilling of thisgoal is beginning to get out of control.

38

Slovakia – Encyclopaedia, Published by Veda, 1972

46

Fig. 14 Gigantic areas covered with impermeable materials
On sunny days they become "hot islands" which transform most solar energy into
sensible heat.

Fig. 15 An asphalt road and a perfectly paved canal in a city environment
Some solutions don't allow even the smallest amount of water to infiltrate the soil.

47

Fig. 16 The hot climatic umbrella of an urban space
Temperature depends on the relation between a built up area and area covered byvegetation.

48

5 THE CONSEQUENCES OF A DECREASE IN THE
WATER OF THE SMALL WATER CYCLE
There is nothing in the world more soft and weak than water, and yet for attacking things
that are firm and strong there is nothing that can take precedence over it. Everyone in theworld knows that the soft overcomes the hard and the weak the strong,but no one is able
to carry it out in practice…
Lao-tzu, The Tao-te Ching, LXXVIII
The acceleration of the runoff of rainwater from a territory, the decrease in the infiltrationof water into the soil and a shortage of vegetation all cause a warming to the surface ofthe land and a gradual change in the microclimatic conditions of the territory involved.
This section is dedicated to the mechanism through which growing temperature
differences cause extreme weather events even on areas of land (almost) untouched byhuman activity. Along with the melting of glaciers caused by global warming, theacceleration of the runoff of water from an area and the draining of land also contribute to
the rising levels of the world's oceans. At the end of the chapter, we take note of thegrowth of global tension resulting from the deficiency of water in the small water cycle
and the inability of popular theories to provide satisfactory explanations and solutions.

5.1 The impact of the decrease in the water of the small water
cycle on the growth of climate extremes
In the previous sections we spoke about how the transforming of a natural landscape intoa developed one speeds up the runoff of rainwater from a territory. The The damaging
intensity of the sluicing of rainwater away from the continents varies transformationfrom place to place and is dependent on population density, the area of landand structure of the relevant agricultural and urban land, but above allon the sensitivity of its management. It's possible to say that alterations to the land always
cause damage when the decrease in water needed for vegetation, evaporation andinfiltration to the transformed territory is not taken into consideration. This decrease inwater from the small water cycle is directly associated with the rise in extreme weather
and with climate changes.
One particularity of the decrease in water is that however small it is, it is expressedalmost immediately in the saturation of the topsoil with water, because it The spiral ofruns from the top parts of the soil profile, or the level of groundwater, the drying out
down to the impermeable subsoil. Lowering the saturation of topsoil of landwith water lowers the ability of the land to evaporate water and increases
the share of solar energy which is immediately changed into sensible heat. The more49

drained (and at the same time also hardened) the soil, the more difficult it is for it toabsorb new rainwater upon further precipitation, while built up areas automatically carryaway rainwater from a territory as fast as possible. Drained soil warms up and creates
thermal islands, which slightly shift precipitation activity away from their own area. Eachfurther turn in the water cycle affected by these factors slightly decreases the volume ofwater in the water cycle over the relevant territory (Fig. 17). With long-term observation,
however, we can see a permanent and systematic decrease in the water balance of theobserved territory (in the course of a century, this represents several percent). Such anincremental, but systematic reshaping of the Earth's surface has a global character. A
synergetic effect emerges and microprocesses grow into macroprocesses which lead to aclearly discernible, vast and continuous deepening of regional, continental and global
climatic changes.
Original natural regions, or cooler and damper regions and territories, Natural
today represent a more stable part of the environment of the continents. regions also
Despite this fact, even they cannot avoid changes in precipitation totals affected
and extreme displays of weather. How is this possible? Warmer air over
hot and dry urban and agricultural expanses (as with completely dry territories such as
semideserts and deserts) pushes precipitation activities into cooler environments formed
by woods and bodies of water, or to places of higher altitude (Fig. 18). The interaction of
so-called dried "hot plates" (agricultural-urban land) with cooler and damper (forexample, mountain) regions causes an unprecedented concentration of cloud cover overthe latter regions.39 Water from the clouds thus falls in great measure on the cooler(mountain) regions (Fig. 19), where it initiates tragic flood waves. Floods then affect thelower agricultural-urban regions despite the fact that in these regions it only rains a little.
During the 20th century, total precipitation increased in the mountain The
regions of Slovakia, while in the lowland regions, it fell (Fig. 20). interaction of
Furthermore, the time period when the majority of rain falls has become warm land
shorter and the periods of low precipitation totals have lengthened40 and cool land
(Fig. 22, 23). This effect of the interaction of warmer and cooler territories also functions
on a smaller scale, for example, in the interaction of a city and its surroundings, as well as
on a larger—even continental—scale: the level of annual rainfall in northern Europe inthe 20th century, according to observations, increased by 10-40% while in the
Mediterranean region it fell by 20%.41 The occurrence of extreme heat waves andintensive showers increased over most of the landmass, and it is very likely that this trend
will continue.

39

See, for example, Roger A. Pielke Sr., "Influence of the Spatial Distribution of Vegetation and Soils on
the Prediction of Cumulus Convective Rainfall," American Geophysical Union, Reviews of Geophysics,
39, 2 / May 2001, s. 151–177
40
For analysis of these trends in Slovakia, see: M. Kravčík, Water for the Third Millennium: Let us Not
Harm Water, and It Will not Harm Us. Košice, People and Water, NGO. ISBN 80-968031-3-1, 2000
41
"Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis – Summary for Policymakers," 10th Sessionof Working Group I of the IPCC, Paris, February 2007

50

The growth of extreme weather is the most destructive manifestation of Growth ofthe climate changes currently taking place and sharply contrasts with the extreme
long-balanced original climate conditions in the region. Breakdowns in weather
weather are expressed through sudden changes in weather and often
through the violent character of these changes. Extreme storms, torrential rains andcyclones are occurring more often, temporal and spatial differences in rainfall arechanging, 42 and periods of unbearable heat and severe drought are getting longer.
Regions which are the most drained are also the most affected by extreme weather
events. Examples of flooding in the Danube (Fig. 21) but also the Morava, Tisa and Prutrivers confirm this fact. Paradoxically, the incidence of more destructive and more
frequent flooding is preventing people from realizing that their country is undergoing aprocess of desertification. This is a great mistake. Some of the ancient stories ofhumanity, such as the Sumerian-Akkadian Epic of Gilgamesh or the Old Testament of the
Bible, come from those countries of the Fertile Crescent which underwent desertification,and reflect the theme of a deluged world. This reflection must have had its basis in realexperience.
It is also paradoxical that soil partially saturated with water is capable Dry soil helpsof better absorbing more water than dried out soil. If precipitation falls runoff
on compacted and dried out soil, infiltration to deeper layers occurs only
after a period of ten minutes or more. In the first minutes, however, the soil behaves likean impermeable surface. During extreme rains, there is a rapid runoff and concentrationof rainwater to river beds. This same rainfall, which would be easily absorbed in land
healthily saturated with water, in a drained land changes streams and creeks into fastflowing rivers, causing extreme flow rates and flood situations. This means that a surface
with no ability to evaporate water creates not only favorable conditions for the origin of
extreme weather, but also exacerbates the effects of such weather.
Long-term drought initiates a spiral of desertification, namely the The
transformation of land into semidesert or desert. Within the context of transformatio
this publication, deserts and semideserts can be understood as fully n of land into
dried-out parts of a continent with minimal or no circulation whatsoever desertof water in the small water cycle. Even conventional natural landscapewith vegetation and sufficient water can turn into semidesert or desert through thedestruction, by human activity, of the small water cycle over the territory (this can, forexample, come about through the burden of too much urban development, too muchintensive farming or the excessive raising of cattle and consequent overgrazing).43 This
fate possibly afflicted even the coastal regions of hundreds of towns in northern Africa,
which was once the granary of the Roman Empire. This gradual process of transforming
once natural landscape with vegetation and sufficient water resources into completely
42

P. Faško, J. Pecho, K. Mikulová, P. Šťastný, "Instances of high daily, monthly and seasonal amounts ofatmospheric precipitaion in East Slovakia at the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st
century in the context of historical data." Collected contributions from the international conference
Protection from Flooding. Podbanské, 2006, pgs. 153 –158
43
Richard van Noorden , More plants make more rain, Satellite observations suggest vegetation encourages
rainfall in Africa; www.nature.com, September 25, 200651

arid land can also be called the conversion of a land into semidesert or, in extreme cases,
desert.
The consequences of extreme manifestations of weather are frequent Consequences
forest fires, floods, degradation and erosion of soil, landslides and of extreme
various ecological and other catastrophes (Fig. 24 and 25), threatening manifestations
the life and health of people and causing vast economic damage. With of weather
the recurrence of these manifestations of weather comes a gradual andpermanent lowering of the competitiveness of the land, which is evident in practicalterms by, for example, the fact that insurance companies refuse to insure property in such
affected localities and the banking sector limits loans and guarantees for projects on these
territories. Floods, drought, tornadoes and other extreme weather events are a syndromeof land which has been exploited and inhabited by human beings with today’s approachto surface water and rainwater.

5.2 The impact of the decrease in the water of the small water
cycle on rising ocean levels
In the past, when the water cycle was still unknown, people posited the Speed ofquestion of how it was possible that the levels of the seas and oceans did rising ocean
not rise when all the rivers in the world constantly flowed into them. levels
Today, when the water cycle is known and hydrological measurements
show that the levels of the seas and oceans are rising, it's as if it hasn't occurred to anyone
that the reason for this phenomenon might also be in the rivers that flow into them (Fig.
26). The rising levels of the oceans are attributed to the melting of icebergs because of
global warming. Individual information sources diverge regarding the degree of the riseof ocean levels during the 20th century, but the majority suggest an amount of 10
centimetres or more, meaning an average of about 1 millimetre per year. At the start ofthe 20th century, the speed of rising levels was in all probability less than 1 mm per year;
at the end of the 20th century, however, it was significantly more than 1 mm per year. At
present, the rate at which the seas are rising is up to 2.4 mm per year.44
The process of monitoring icebergs and glaciers is a logical one given
Water stored
the fact they contain so much water, water contained in permanent ice in icebergs
and snow making up about 1.7% of the world’s stocks of water and and glaciers
nearly 70% of the world's stocks of fresh water. The extent of glaciation
throughout history has logically corresponded with temperatures on Earth, this fact also
being responsible for fluctuations in ocean levels. The level of the world's ocean at thepeak of the last Ice Age, 20,000 years ago, was about 125 meters lower than it is today.
Most ice today can be found in Antarctica, accounting for nearly 90% of the world's icethat is stored on land in icebergs. The ice in Greenland accounts for about 10%. The
44

Source: NASA, http://sealevel.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/presentations/public-presentation/03-GP-scienceapps.ppt#19

52

melting of all glaciers found in Antarctica and Greenland would, according tocalculations, cause the world's oceans to rise by 60-80 meters, while the melting of
icebergs on all other lands would contribute only about half a meter to such a rise. The
melting of ice of non-terrestrial origin (for instance in the Arctic Ocean) which floats on
the ocean, on the contrary, does not increase sea levels. The Archimedian principle
applies here: just as in the case of a free-floating ice cube in a cup full of liquid.
For the stability of glaciers the same thing is important as for the Balance ofstability of hydrological ratios within a country: a stable water balance. icebergs
In the case of glaciers this involves a balance between accumulation,
particularly through the impact of falling snow, and reduction, particularly through the
influence of melting and sublimation. Unfortunately, a more complex glacial balance isstudied in (smaller) glaciers away from the more inaccessible territories of Greenland andAntarctica. The majority of these actually record larger or smaller decreases in volume.
As for Greenland and Antarctica, the images the public have of them are formed
especially under the influence of popular and emotional scenes promoted in the media
showing icesheets breaking off and shattering in areas around the oceans. Such footage isusually made from the edges of ice-shelves which are most easily accessible to the media
and to expeditionary parties. Often, though, the reason for ice-shelves breaking off isinterpreted incorrectly. The breaking off of icesheets from the edges of continental
glaciers directly extending into the oceans and seas and the cracking of non-terrestrial
icebergs are often mechanical in origin, e.g. with constant fluctuations in (rising) sea
levels caused by tidal ebb and flow contributing to this process.
Research conducted on glaciers in Antarctica and Greenland, however, Terrestrial
show that inland the thickness of the ice is, in fact, permanently glaciers
growing, because in the environment of permafrost snow piles up andnever melts. Data about the balance of glaciers in Antarctica and inGreenland are not unambiguous. In recent times, however, Greenland looks to show adecrease in total balance of ice.45 It is logical that the present trend of warming continents
will lead to a rapid decrease, for example, in glaciers in the Alps, which are surroundedby the "hot plates" of Europe’s industrial regions. Glacier water in this case becomes acomponent of runoff and ends up in the seas, thus contributing (partially) to their risinglevels.
A further logical explanation of the rising levels of the oceans, besides Drainage ofthe increase of runoff from glaciers, is the increase in the runoff of water land and thefrom land of non-glacial origin and its subsequent storing in the oceans. rise of ocean
While the runoff from melting icebergs is almost unanimously accepted levels
as an explanation for rising ocean levels, any explanation that points to adecrease in the amount of water on land is met with great prejudice and intellectual
opposition. And yet a small, hardly noticeable increase of roughly 1% in the annual

45

See, for example, "Greenland's Ice Melt Grew by 250 Percent, Satellites Show," National Geographic,
September 20, 2006, http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/060920-greenland-ice.html

53

runoff to the oceans (in comparison the equilibrium balance) through rivers would, to thedetriment of groundwater, soil moistness and the growth of vegetation, represent a
volume of water that over 100 years would increase the volume of the oceans by about
36,146 km³ of water (ignoring the increased evaporation from ocean levels as a result of
rising temperatures, thermal expansion of water, etc.), an increase which would accountfor a rise in their levels of about 10 cm.
Levels may have increased by even more centimeters during the cultural Missing
history of humanity thanks to the water which numerous civilizations water on land
lost from their own territory: water from the European climax forest
logged over the past thousand years or water which in the time of the Roman Empire
irrigated cities and fields in a coastal strip of Northern Africa. If someone denies that thiswater is in the oceans, then he should be able to say where else it actually is. One thing iscertain: in the overwhelming majority of cases the amount of water on land "civilized" byhumanity is not the same as it once was. At the moment we don't know what share ofwater involved in the rise in ocean levels is of glacial and non-glacial origin. It is thus
a responsibility of the scientific community to start dealing more seriously with thequestion of land water of non-glacial origin and its effect on rising sea levels. It is, after
all, water missing from land and not from icebergs which we feel the absence of more.

5.3 The impact of the decrease in the water of the small water
cycle on the rise in global tension
During the 20th century the annual average air temperature in Slovakia Slovakia asrose by about 1.1 °C (even more in winter). Meanwhile, the average illustrative ofannual sum of precipitation fell by 5.6% (in the southern plains the fall the problems
was more than 10%; in the mountainous north there was a rise of 3%
during the century). Also, a significant decline in relative air humidity was recorded (upto 5%). Characteristics of potential and actual evaporation, soil moistness, global
radiation and the radiation balance all confirm that south Slovakia is gradually drying out(potential evapotranspiration grows and soil moistness falls).46 Spatial concentration in
the fall of precipitation is accompanied by a concentration in the time division of this
precipitation, i.e. periods of "drought" are lengthening and the timeframe in which the
majority of precipitation falls is getting shorter. Flood waves arise, extending into thewarmed lowland regions where it almost never rains. Little Slovakia, even though it in noway ranks among the most problematic countries in the world in terms of the problems
outlined here and the subsequent damage they cause, can be seen as an example
illustrating the typical hydrological problems of the modern world.

46"Fourth National Report of the SR on climate change and the Report on achieving progress for fulfillingof the Kyoto Protocol." Slovak Republic, Ministry of the Environment of the SR, Slovak
Hydrometeorological Institute, Bratislava, 2005

54

The United Nations’ predictions for the climate and circulation of the The
world's water in the 21st century are at best worrying and at worst prognosis ofcatastrophic: "Global warming may already be with us, but the much further
greater warming forecast for the 21st century will produce vast changes worsening ofin evaporation and precipitation, allied to a more unpredictable the climatehydrological cycle. Higher air temperatures will increase evaporation from the world’s
oceans, intensifying the water cycle. They will also mean faster evaporation of waterfrom land, so that less rainfall reaches rivers. These changes will be accompanied by new
rainfall patterns and more extreme weather events, including floods and droughts.“47 This
climate shift in which the influence of the large water cycle starts to dominate the small
water cycle is just one of the UN’s gallery of horrors. Along with predictions that dry
regions of the world will in the future be even drier and wet regions still wetter, their listof threats ends with the statement that in the unpredictable world of the future, one thingwhich is predictable is a growth in the number of countries with water shortages.
Direct personal consumption of water for drinking and hygiene isConsumption
relatively small and can be counted in dozens of litres per person per and the needday. The amount of water needed for turning out the daily ration of food for water
per person, however, can be measured in thousands of litres and isincreasing. The consumption of water in industry in the 20th century
also had a tendency to grow. The availability of 1700 m3 water per person annually isdefined as the basic level for satisfying the combined needs of people, agriculture,industry and the environment. In view of this, we can consider a volume between 1700
and 1000 m3 of water available per person annually as a state of stress and a volume ofunder 1000 m3 as an insufficient amount of water. Countries with less than 500 m3 ofwater per person annually are considered to be countries with a catastrophic shortage ofwater. Such countries are, for example, Somalia or the territory of Palestine, which haveaccess to only about 320 m3 per person annually. At present an estimated 700 million
people in 43 countries around the world live in a state of water stress. These areparticularly centered in the Middle East and in Sub-Saharan Africa.
With the current tendency of cities to grow, a growth in both personal Prognosis ofand industrial consumption of water can be anticipated. At the same time future watera growth in the need for water for the production of food in the poorest needs
developing countries can also be anticipated. Those countries with highpopulation growth and low financial capital, already using more than 80% of their wateron agriculture, will be severely affected by the increase in extreme weather. We can
expect a loss of livelihood for millions of small farmers and a growth in their dependence
on food from developed countries. The need for water sources is growing because thenumber of such sources, their volume and their quality, are all getting lower. In the faceof the growing demands of people, agriculture and industry, it is usually the environment
which pays, and if no change occurs, the environment will continue to pay the biggest
price. According to a UN report, the number of people living in a state of water stresswill have probably increased by the year 2025 to more than 3 billion, with 14 countries
47

Human Development Report 2006. Published for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) –Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis

55

having moved from the category of "water-stressed" to the category of "waterinsufficient".48
Some indications of the coming shortage of water are already visible Absence of
today. Reports are coming from different corners of the world about solutions
catastrophic droughts, desertification or salination of the soil over vast
areas, about regions with a rapid decline in groundwater levels or rivers and lakes drying
up or the expansion of deserts. Increases in average or seasonal temperatures can haveserious consequences on the physical and psychological health of people and bring aboutproblems with adaptation. The scenario of adaptation is, in fact, almost the only one
which international organizations have so far been able to offer the world's public. This
scenario, however, merely documents a sense of resignation and admission of
powerlessness in dealing with the problem. The shift of a huge number of people,
populations and industry to cooler regions is also practically impossible because it would
be accompanied by the irreplaceable loss of the cultural and natural heritage of theabandoned population centers and lands.
In this atmosphere of stress, a growing number of authors are repeating
War orthe words of the previous Secretary General of the U.N., Boutros water?
Boutros-Ghali, that the wars of the 21st century will be wars over water.
Water has already begun being used as a de facto weapon of political pressure between
states, last but not least on the territory of what used to be Mesopotamia. The Turkish
GAP project (a development project for southeast Anatolia) is counting on theconstruction of 21 dams and 19 hydroelectric plants on the Euphrates and Tigris rivers.
This massive exploitation of their waters and the waters from their tributaries forintensive agriculture over gigantic areas should increase the number and volume of
harvests each year, the agricultural products of which will be largely sold as exports. But
Syria and Iraq, lying further downstream, both seriously fear the possibility of being
blackmailed and threatened with lower amounts (as has already happened) and lower
quality (higher salinity) of water. And the situation is not helped by the statements ofsome Turkish representatives who say that just as it wouldn't occur to them to makeclaims on crude oil whose sources are in Iraq, so Iraq can make no claims on water which
originates in Turkey.
Pessimists on the question of wars over water recall the account from Pessimistic
the year 2450 before Christ about just such a war between two Sumerian views
city states, Lagash and Umma, in the lower Mesopotamian valley.
Optimists point to the fact that even though water, as almost everything in the world, hasoften been the subject of internal battles and armed conflicts, except for the casementioned, there are no other known interstate armed conflicts in history in which
supplies of water would be considered a strategic and not "merely" a tactical goal. It's
good to be an optimist, even though it is often cynically argued that an optimist is merely
a badly informed pessimist, but in the case of potential supplies of water in the 21st
century both groups are inclined to agree that the prospects are gloomy, with moredangers on the horizon than promised solutions.
48

ibid.

56

Tab.6 Possible indicators of the reasons and the consequences of a decrease in thewater of the small water cycle– trend in fall of minimal flow rates in watercourses– trend in growth of extreme flow rates (flood waves) in watercourses– trend in long-term decrease of precipitation in a drained area,– space and time changes in distribution of precipitation in an area
– trend in growth of extreme precipitation and storm activities– trend in long-term rise in ocean levels– trend in long-term decline in groundwater levels– trend in fall of soil moistness– trend in fall in volume of groundwater reserves– expanding of drained territories, semideserts and deserts– growth in the number of populations with worsening access to drinking and utility water– fall in the biodiversity of a territory– rise in ecosystem imbalances– overheated territory and expanding areas of "hot urban and agricultural plates"– trend in growth in temperature differences between hot plates and preserved natural areas with vegetationcover– trend in expanding of built-up areas, impermeable surfaces, surface coverings of buildings and otherbuilt-up spaces– shortening the length of watercourses (by alteration of flows, cutting off tributaries)– trend in fall in the percentage of bodies of water (lakes, ponds and other water surfaces within villages or
outside of villages) and wetland areas (marshlands) from the total area of a country– trend in growth of drained areas (by buildings and hard surfaces)–trend in fall of forested areas– growth in the number of insurance events and the volume of paid-out insurance for natural disasters andfor damages caused by extreme weather and their results

Fig. 17 The growth of extreme weather with the decrease of water in the small water
cycle

57

With a decrease of water in the system, temperature differences arise which cause
different types of extreme weather.

Fig. 18 The impact of the transformation of land on the destruction of small water
cyclesRising radiant flows push clouds to cooler environments.

Fig. 19 The growth of weather extremes in damper and cooler environments – theconcentration of precipitation forcing it from dryer lands

58

Fig. 20 The growth of precipitation in mountainous northern regions and thedecrease of precipitation in southern lowlands – Slovakia used as an example

Fig. 21 The rise in precipitation in mountainous regions and the decrease of
precipitation lowlands – Danube watershed

59

Fig. 22 Precipitation trends in Slovakia
Periods of "drought" are lengthening (A) and the time period in which most precipitation
falls is getting shorter (B).

Fig. 23 Average annual precipitation totals in Prešov
Resembles the average trend throughout Slovakia.

60Fig. 24 The incursion of cold air to the High Tatras regions (the Tatra bora) - theassumed state around the year 1800
The conditions of the land under the mountains allowed for the gentle dissipation of thecurrents.

Fig. 25 Wind storm in the High Tatra mountains, Slovakia, November 19, 2004
Radiant flows of warmed currents from agricultural-urban areas (zone D) accelerated air
currents with the rapidly falling cold front through the ridge of the High Tatra mountains:v(A) 150 – 200 km/h, v(B) < 100 km/h; v(C) 200 – 250 km/h, v(D) < 150 km/h.
61

Fig. 26 The impact of glaciers melting (A) and the decline in the reserves of water on
the continents (B) on rising ocean levels (C)626 THE OLD AND THE NEW WATER PARADIGM

Hath the rain a father? or who hath begotten the drops of dew?
The Bible, Job 38:28
For in the wilderness shall waters break out, and streams in the desert, and the parchedground shall become a pool,and the thirsty land springs of water...
The Bible, Isaiah 35:6-7
Philosophers, historians and thinkers diverge in many things in regard to the modern age
in Europe, but concur in the fact that it has been characterized by a strong emphasis on
rational thinking and scientific knowledge. The reality of the problems associated withthe lack of what until recently seemed to be a ubiquitous, commonplace substance—water—has challenged this rather self-important and arrogant modern age approach.
From a careful critique of the old perception of the water question, we will present in thischapter a new attitude to water which respects its value and function in the environment
much more.

6.1 The old water paradigm
Above all, the modern age is characterized by the conviction that human Faith inunderstanding can solve all our problems and that science and science andtechnology inevitably lead to continuous progress and to an ever happier progressand better world. Two world wars and many other wars in the 20th
century, as well as the Holocaust, the atomic bomb, the emergence of totalitarianregimes, the share of science in the development of destructive weapons, industrial
ecological catastrophes and many other factors have, however, undermined this faith inscience and in inevitable progress to the point that many thinkers even consider the years
1965-1975 as the beginning of a skeptical, post-modern period in which some people
believe that evolution can also go backwards, or move in cycles or spirals.
We can clearly see a reflection of the originally Biblical and, in the 20th Humanity
century, a strongly secularized mind of the type: "man, lord of all changes thecreatures, is changing the course of nature" in the management of water. course of
Hardly anyone in countries possessing sufficient water supplies ever nature
considered the possibility of a future shortage of water. Occasional
voices calling for responsibility in the management of water were often lost in the
optimism founded on the seeming omnipotence of scientific and technological solutions.
Engineering solutions were able to carry water over great distances when necessary.

63

Great waterworks, which aside from the usual functions of waterworks, also had energygenerating functions and served as anti-flood protection, were built for the accumulationof water. Water in the land and the soil was seen more of a handicap, so wetlands weredrained, river flows straightened and meanders and dead-end tributaries removed in orderto gain more agricultural land. Watercourses were channeled so that water could besluiced away as fast as possible. Boundaries were plowed and hydromorphic landelements were removed in order to obtain the largest contiguous areas, which seemed at
the time, to be a synonym for modern mass-production. The drainage of land was aimed
at expanding areas, increasing profits from certain xerophilous cereals and achieving selfsufficiency in the production of bread. If necessary, there was plenty of surface water
available for irrigation.
Rainwater in cities suffered the same fate as water in the countryside.
The seemingStanding water or mud in cities were considered as signs of a lower victory overculture. Therefore, as many open areas as possible were covered in nature
concrete, and rainwater that fell on them and on roofs was carried away
by sewers to the nearest stream. All water for residents was generously supplied as
drinking water, without any consideration of the fact that only a small part of it would
actually be used for consumption. Water was utilized once only and after purification,
sent to the seas. The supplying of water from ducts and the sewage systems of cities andvillages were certainly and rightfully given credit for their successful part in the
suppressing of many infectious diseases, hence the strategic goal to expand thesefacilities to as many of the population as possible. This way of perceiving and handlingwater enjoyed great successes and for developing countries became a model of order andcivilization to achieve, expanding particularly in countries with a relatively abundant
supply of water.
The "old paradigm" is more tradition and actual practice than a unified, The first great
articulated theory. Despite this fact, as a background of thought it really failures
exists and is reflected in textbooks and in practice. It once promised
peace, safety and prosperity. With the passage of time, however, we can now say that thispromise has not been fulfilled. If we were to search for a textbook example of the failureof engineering approaches to the management of water in the modern age, we would
probably find the most drastic example in the former Soviet Union. The Communist
regime in that country fancied itself, in a certain sense, to be the perfect embodiment of"rationalism" of the modern age, and the catastrophe of the inland Aral Sea, even though
not all aspects of it are typical, can be considered an epitome of the arrogant handling ofwater in the second half of the 20th century. Some 3500 years of inhabited fertile land
between the water-rich Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers ended in ecological catastrophe
after just 30 years of profligate plundering of water for irrigation: the partial drying out of
the sea and the rivers, the destruction of their ecosystems, the rapid lowering of
biodiversity (fish no longer live in the Aral Sea) and the total desertification of the region
culminating in winds now spreading salt and pesticides from the bare seafloor all acrossthe region. For the most part, the dried up Aral Sea has stopped moderating thedifferences of temperatures between winter and summer. With the growth of temperature
differences, the speed of the winds has increased, as has the intensity of local dust storms.

64

The degradation of the environment has gone hand in hand with the economic decline of
the area and a long list of related health problems amongst approximately 3 million
inhabitants in the immediate area and 35 million inhabitants in the broader regions
around the sea.
But the insensitive handling with water is not only a problem of Central
The cracks
Asia. Here in Europe we know it more as human activity in the areas of warning offorest and water management and agricultural and urban zones, activity the fall of awhich derives from the philosophy of getting rid of water from construction
watersheds as quickly as possible. We've already mentioned some of its
consequences in this publication. Lowering the ability of watersheds to retain water has
the effect of emptying the small water cycle in nature, causing a decline in soil moistureand a fall in groundwater levels, as well as a warming of the whole local area. In
mountains and foothill regions, fields without natural barriers to prevent the runoff of
rainwater are an ideal setting for soil erosion and the occurrence of local flooding. Other
negative results are the rapid aggradation of reservoirs, the lowering of groundwater
reserves, a fall in the minimal flow rates in rainwater deficit periods and the growing
trend in the culmination of flood flow rates. Water managers no longer even try to
disguise the fact that if the extreme claims on the state budget the measures they havesuggested were actually provided, the situation would not improve, or would only
improve only a little. More and more our cities are being converted into dried-up "hotislands" where people suffer allergies to dust and pollen and where, in the summer heat,elderly people die of heart attacks. Cities, whose locations were once selected with an eye
on their rich sources of water, now go to extreme lengths to transport and purify waterfrom great distances and at the same time as sluicing away all the rainwater that falls on
their own heads.
Meteorological observations demonstrate that 11 of the past 12 years The growth(1995-2006) are among the 12 warmest years on record in terms of the of weather
average temperature of the Earth's surface. Global warming, according extremes
to the main current of contemporary science, will not stop, however,even centuries after the elimination of its apparent causes, these being emissions of CO2
and other greenhouse gases from human activity, gases which cause an increase in theeffects of solar radiation in the atmosphere. And associated with increasing temperaturesof the atmosphere and the oceans is a proportionate increase in the content of water vapor
in the atmosphere (for each degree Celsius of this increase, the air can theoreticallyabsorb about 7% more water vapor). This causes numerous long-lasting climatic changesof regional and continental significance. The occurrence of extreme heat waves andintensive showers increased over most of the landmass, and it is very likely that this trend
will continue.49 Serious dry spells (droughts) have affected vast regions of Europe, Asia,
Canada, western and southern Africa and eastern Australia. The number of heavy floods(100-200 year floods) also increased significantly during the second half of the 20th
century.50
49"Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis – Summary for Policymakers." 10th Sessionof Working Group I of the IPCC, Paris, February 200750
CRS Report for Congress, Climate Change: Science and Policy Implications. Order Code RL33849,

65

The scientific knowledge on which the modern age once relied Global
nowadays spreads more fear of the future than hope for solutions. warming asContemporary science blames global warming for most of the above the chief
mentioned, and many other, negative trends. The growing extremes of enemy
climate are, in its eyes, a subset, if not a direct synonym, of global
warming, which will likely intensify in this century. And yet the period between the 9th
and 13th century, which was markedly warmer than the 20th century, appears to havebeen the best in Europe from today's climatic-historical point of view. Vineyards were
cultivated on a commercial basis 300 to 500 kilometers north of the limits of theircultivation in the 20th century, and the Vikings settled Greenland. This was above all,however, a period of unprecedented climatic stability, only occasionally disrupted byextreme weather events. This climatic "golden age" allowed for a great economic boom,
the building of cathedrals as well as further expansion of agriculture with accompanying
deforestation. On the other hand, the cooling period we long for today brought Europe, inthe time of its Little Ice Age (with certain departures, from the 14th to the mid-19th
century), high instability in the weather accompanied by poor harvests, poverty, famineand other misfortunes.51 The growth in climatic extremes are thus not identical with
global warming, nor is the stabilization of the climate necessarily dependent on its
cooling.
It is astounding, then, that while scientific publications and conferences Trends inemphasize the impacts of global warming on the circulation of water in scientificnature, almost all of them are totally silent on the influence the water research
cycle has on climatic changes. The fascination with CO2 is so great,though, that it even dominates the relatively small number of scientific articles which areconcerned with the relationship between vegetation and the climate. The mechanism bywhich heat in water vapor is given off in the upper part of the troposphere is, like theeffects of clouds on the thermal balance of the Earth, under-researched.52 What excites
the interest of scientists is the albedo, i.e. the proportion of reflected solar radiation in
relation to the total falling on Earth. Here vegetation falls into disfavor, because it
absorbs more (reflects less) solar radiation than soil cleared of vegetation.53 It's logicalthat, given the current state of knowledge, many scientists are missing among those who
argue for the watering and forestation of continents, even though they rarely speak openly
about this. They don't, however, have another formula for rescuing the planet, aside fromthe already mentioned prospect of lowering the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere (bylowering its production in industry, not its absorption by vegetation). No wonder that inthis desperate situation scientists and politicians are orienting their efforts more towards
methods of adapting to the "inevitable" negative changes than towards averting them.
January 25, 2007
51

Brian Fagan, The Little Ice Age - How Climate Made History, 1300-1850, Academia, Prague, 2007
Wigley, T. M. L., V. Ramaswamy, J. R. Christy, J. R. Lanzante, C. A. Mears, B. D. Santer, C. K.
Folland, Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere – Understanding and Reconciling Differences,
Executive Summary, A Report by the Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global
Change Research, 2006
53
See, for example, "Trees to Offset the Carbon Footprint?" Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
April 10, 2007, http://www.llnl.gov/PAO/news/news_releases/2007/NR-07-04-03.html
5266

Not only in the modern age, but probably throughout all of history, The need forpeople in regions abundant in water have felt as if its abundance would a newnever come to an end. Even just a few decades ago, a shortage of water paradigm
in a country like Slovakia was as hard to imagine as a sudden change inthe climate. In the 20th century, however, humanity reached a degree of development thatallowed it, knowingly or unknowingly, to change the water cycle to an unprecedented
extent, and these changes, caused by human activities (along with many other factors)
have clearly occurred and are still occurring. The old paradigm, which considered water
as an eternally renewable resource, has failed, the truth being that water is only arenewable resource as long as the water cycle is functional. A new paradigm is therefore
needed which will carefully protect the fragile equilibrium of this water cycle.

6.2 The new water paradigm
That which we have introduced in the previous chapter is not meant to Merits of thebe an absolute denial of everything that the old water paradigm old paradigm
propagated and achieved. The truth is otherwise. We know that in thehistory of ideas, systems that have attempted to negate everything that preceded them
have turned out badly. We also know that even such a great scientist as Sir Isaac Newton
once modestly stated: "If I have seen further it is only by standing on the shoulders ofgiants." The old water paradigm achieved exceptional effectiveness in solving immediate
and particular problems of water. If it was necessary, it managed to retain water, transport
it great distances, use it, purify it and carry it away. The old water paradigm is still
successfully fulfilling these tasks today and would undoubtedly continue to do so evenmore successfully in the future. Just as Christians in the first centuries used stones frompagan temples to build their own temples, so will the emerging new water paradigm
utilize many of the old achievements. The new water paradigm, however, must utilize
them in a new spirit.
The new water paradigm must learn from the mistakes of the old Learning
paradigm. In our opinion, among the biggest mistakes of the old fromparadigm is that water was perceived as an isolated entity, water’s mistakes
interaction in the framework of the whole ecosystem being neglected,
particularly water hidden from view (water in soil, in the atmosphere, in plants). The
paradigm also neglected the synergic effect of introducing even minor measures toregulate the state and circulation of water in a country. Readers who did not begin
reading this publication at this chapter but who have also read the previous chapters,
know what kind of measures and what impacts we have in mind. The old paradigm
considers water as a fixed given renewable resource which is subordinate to deviations in
the global climate, or is even its "toy," but which itself has no noticeable influence on the
global climate. The circulation of water, according to the old water paradigm, was rarely
influenced by human activities and if it were, then only marginally and indirectly, via theinfluence of other parameters which supposedly had a larger impact on the global climate

67

than water. The blindness of the old paradigm to climatic impacts of water management
measures is furthermore crowned by its ignorance and denial of the importance of thesmall water cycle. Given the current level (lack) of knowledge, we can hardly wonderthat water managers and all other people who come into contact with water issues, areneglecting the importance of the water balance on all levels, manage it badly and areespecially destructive in their treatment of the small water cycle.
In the new water paradigm, the water balance at all levels—on the Only aterritory of individual communities, within cities, in forests, on permanent
agricultural land—is the central theme. The new water paradigm warns balance isthat unlike the issue of global warming, the issue of the drying of the sustainable
continents, or substantial parts of them, is receiving very little public orscientific attention. The drying and subsequent warming of the continents causes anacceleration of natural processes following a certain specific pattern andinterdependance.54 The drying is caused by urbanization with its rapid sluicing away ofrainwater to the seas and oceans, by agricultural activities and by the deforestation ofever larger areas of the Earth's surface. This drying creates "hot plates" with a complete
chain reaction: the warming of continents, the destabilization of the water cycle and anincrease in extreme weather. This is causing extensive damage to both economies andcivilization. That's why calculating, systematic monitoring, guarding and maintaining
equilibrium in water balances is becoming imperative even on the city level. Thus far inits history, however, mankind has not even considered this condition for sustainableeconomic and civilizational growth.
The new paradigm, though, not only calculates the balance of water but
Replenishingalso offers a solution for making up the deficit. We can return the lost the deficit inwater back to the continents by keeping rainwater on a massive scale in the balance
the places where it falls, particularly in those areas where the influenceof human activity is causing a drying out. Just as the impact of human activities (as theirunplanned secondary effect) can lead to a breakdown in the small water cycle, so
concerted human activity can contribute to its renewal over land as well as to securinglong-term stability in the water balance of a territory with sufficient water resources. If
the current method of managing rainwater and surface water on land is turned around andthe conservation of rainwater and surface water on land is ensured by a system of allembracing measures for increasing the water-holding ability of an entire watershed(which are often identical with anti-erosion measures); and if only the surplus surface
water is sluiced away from an area, then with each turn of the cycle there will be recoveryof the small water cycle, the reserves of groundwater will gradually improve, the volume
of precipitation will increase, and extreme weather events will decrease.
Mankind has used different means of rainwater harvesting and waterconservation over the millennia in order to obtain sufficient water
resources. Our knowledge of their broader impact on the stabilizing of

The principleof water cycle
saturation

54

See, for example, "A new paradigm for assessing the role of agriculture in the climate system and inclimate change," Roger A. Pielke Sr., Jimmy O. Adegoke, Thomas N. Chase, Curtis H. Marshall, Toshihisa
Matsui, Dev Niyogi, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 142 (2007), 234 – 25468the water cycle and climate is often primarily intuitive—it was never described from thescientific standpoint. Traditional systems for obtaining water in the 20th century were
founded on the building of reservoirs in which water was collected and which served tobalance the water regime of rivers. This water was subsequently used to supply the
population and to serve the needs of industry and the production of energy and food. In
our case, however, the goal is to collect rainwater and, wherever possible, return it to thesmall water cycle. The primary principle is to allow infiltration of water into the soil, its
saturation and the creation of groundwater reserves as well as surface water reserves, andthereby foster the growth of vegetation, which works as a climatization valve between thesoil and the atmosphere. The capacity of soil (and subsoil) is usually much higher thanthe volume of the largest artificial reservoirs in a country. The process of saturation of thesmall water cycle should be repeated so long as the hydrological regime of watersheds
are out of balance. However, such measures need to be carried out on a massive scale.
Leaving untreated great "hot plates" lowers the effectiveness of measures taken in their
nearby surroundings and sometimes even directly threatens them. The measures that need
to be taken are simple, effective and cheap but need to be implemented in the territory ofeach community and town. Wherever possible, all the communities in the world should
get involved in this program of rainwater harvesting and conservation on the continents.
Rainwater harvesting and the conservation of water on land has a Water against
number of aspects which on first view can appear to be paradoxical. water
People fearing floods can mistakenly expect that a dry country can better
absorb a great amount of water than a country which is already significantly saturated
with water. Experiments and experience show otherwise, however. Water flows over sunburned land as if over impermeable plastic foil while water infiltrates into healthy soil,
held firm by vegetation, as if into a sponge. What's more, moderate temperature
differences on the surface of land covered with healthy vegetation do not induce thetorrential type of precipitation which occurs in an overheated, dehydrated landscape. One
paradox, then, is that water itself is the best protection against water.
Another apparent paradox is that, despite what many people might think, A growing
the method of conserving rainwater in one area does not deprive cakeneighboring lands downstream of precious water. The difference issimilar to that between a static command economy and a developing free economy. The
first always divides the same small cake, and a larger piece for one means a smaller piece
for the other. The second, however, divides a cake which is always growing for the
benefit of all. The conservation of rainwater on land actually helps neighboring lands.
The runoff of rainwater from a country is not stopped completely but is merely slowed
down. In place of the sudden rain-dictated, often extremely small or extremely large flow
rates, particularly from surface runoff, a much more balanced runoff, fed fromgroundwater, can now be passed on to one’s neighbors. Moderate rain from the small
water cycle rooted in a water-saturated country moistens the cities, fields and forests ofneighboring lands and thus opens up the opportunity for these places to manage water inthe same way. The method of retaining rainwater on land creates cascades of watersheds (ortheir parts) rich in water instead of dry cascades of watersheds.

69

The new water paradigm means developing, utilizing and supportingnew culture
overland rainwater harvesting and conserving rainwater in watersheds so Aofthat ecosystems can "produce" enough good quality water for humanity, responsibility
food and nature, can purify polluted water, can reduce the risk of natural for water
disasters like floods, droughts and fires, can stabilize the climate andstrengthen biodiversity and can become a component of economically sustainable
development programs. What the new water paradigm offers is promotion and support
for such a culture of land use which will permanently renew water in the water cycle
through saturation of the soil with rainwater. The new water paradigm means a return to anatural responsibility for the state of water in one’s region, but can also bring a new
dimension of solidarity and tolerance between people and communities in watersheds.
The new water paradigm brings with it a lot of exceptionally good news.
The promises
The new economy of water promises that it will be able to balance the of a new
debt that arose in the past, lower the unwanted effects of this debt paradigm
manifesting themselves in ever more extreme weather, stabilize themanagement of water and guarantee its sufficiency.55 The continents, with harvested
rainwater, will stabilize thermally and climatically and the extremes in the weather—
particularly floods and drought—will be mitigated (Fig. 27). Increasing the water-holding
capacity of the land and harvesting precipitation in the places where it falls arethemselves effective anti-flood measures. Natural disasters will obviously always occur,
but excluding external factors, the level of economic and civilization damage caused by
the weather will be greatly reduced. These statements also apply to the possibile revivalof semideserts and deserts through rainwater (Fig. 28, 29, 30). With these areas we canassume an exceptionally long and difficult process, because the evaporated water, given
the thermal differences, will be carried away to other regions. Nevertheless, particularlyin those cases where the change was unwittingly caused by man, deliberate, carefullyplanned human activity can perhaps return them to their previous state. The slow andgradual revival of semideserts and deserts through rainwater, particularly in places where
just a relatively short time ago civilizations blossomed, should not therefore be
impossible.
This thinking represents both an exciting challenge and a program of Exciting
activity at the same time. Just as our ancestors attempted in their battle challenges
with nature to stake out a piece of uncultivated land and civilize it, so
must we attempt to recover from the ocean the water we all have lost in the struggle, sothat the efforts of our ancestors to civilize our planet were not merely in vain. We canbegin with relatively small volumes of water, like collecting rainwater for the dried-out
lawn in our front yards. From there we should go on to the much larger task of finding a
way to regain the water which once existed on the territory of cities and which, since thetimes of the industrial revolution, has been running out into the oceans. The largest, andin a country like Slovakia the maximally taxing, requirement would be to recover all thewater which existed in the ecosystem at the time of the climax forest that covered the55

See, for example, Oldřich Syrovátka, Miloslav Šír and Miroslav Tesař. "A change in the approach to land
– a condition for sustainable development" (2002). Available atwww.changenet.sk/ludiaavoda/sprava.stm?x=66907

70

land a thousand years ago. On other territories, the challenge would have to go evenfurther; for example, we would like to return water and renew the water cycle in the
Mediterranean or on the once fertile lands of the Fertile Crescent.
It's good to be aware of the objective fact that water itself represents a A parallel
financial value and adds to a country's wealth. Let's imagine, then, that a with financial
society of people living in a watershed or one of its parts, is employed in management
a relatively independent branch of a large company which includes all of
humanity. The company deals in the appreciation of fresh water, which, in this case, we
can imagine as synonymous with money. Water in living organisms will have the mostvalue. The more water there is in living organisms, the more life, biodiversity and foodthere will be and the better will be the protection of all other water environments. We cancompare this water in living organisms to a treasure we do not want to give up under any
circumstances. Water in the soil is a deposit in a high-interest account. If there is moneyin the bank, the profit from it will pleasantly grow thanks to the interest rate. If, however,
we fall into debt in soil moisture and we don't want to lose our treasure of water stored inliving organisms, the downward spiral of taking new loans from other surrounding water
to pay the interest may suddenly threaten to destroy us. The draining of the land is likeliving on debts. Water falling from the large water cycle is like a state subsidy. It comesfor free but not regularly, often to wrong recipients and in the wrong amounts. It
sometimes brings more harm than good. To rely on it is risky because today it is here but
tomorrow it may not be. It is only the rainfall in the small water cycle which springs fromthe activities of the company, or sometimes from the activities of its other branches;
often, too, it is the previous generation of company employees who, through their hard
work, deserve credit for much of the profit we have today. Water in rivers is, if you like,a gift which the community higher in the watershed hands down to the communities
lower on the river. The society which acts as the bearer of such a gift should not try toplunder it, but should pass it down in a fit and cared-for state.
The new water paradigm promises more to reduce extreme weather than The growth
to stop global warming altogether, even though the evaporation of water of extremes is
into the atmosphere would cool the local climate. There are two reason worse thanfor this. Despite the great space the media offers to popular theories warming
about the alleged causes of global warming, these causes have not been
sufficiently researched with respect to present or past climate changes, nor with respect tothe influence of humanity and other influences. The second reason is that we perceive theincreasingly extreme weather and climate in territories with insufficient water as a muchgreater threat to humanity than global warming. The fact that some mechanisms in thebalance of energy flows are not explained yet means we cannot prescribe a formula for
global cooling. However, it in no way changes our assertion that a saturated water cycle
is a planet’s cooling mechanism. Rainwater kept in ecosystems cools the surface of the
Earth through evaporation; vegetation greatly helps moderate temperatures and optimize
evaporation; clouds create shadows which stabilize the temperature of the Earth's surface.

71Obviously, the new water paradigm is not omnipotent. It will not be able Changes
to prevent those great and sudden changes in the water cycle and in which are notclimates whose origins are outside the activities of humanity. These in our powerinclude the cycles of solar activity, swings in the Earth's axis, the fall of
meteorites, the eruptions of volcanoes and the like, though the effects of some of thesecan in some ways be mitigated. The domain of the new water paradigm are changes inthe effects of human activities, and this field is far wider than was understood in the oldwater paradigm. All other things should be perceived through the prism of the classic
stoicism of Epictetus: "Some things are within our power and some things are beyond
it...if we desire those things which are not in our power, we will surely bedisappointed."56

Tab.13 A comparison of starting points and approaches according to the old and the
new water paradigm
Old water paradigm
The water on land does not influence global
warming, which is caused by the growth in thevolume of greenhouse gases produced by humanactivity.
The subject of research is the impact of global
warming on the water cycle.
Urbanization, industrialisation and economic
exploitation of a country has minimal impact on thewater cycle.
The impact of humanity on the water cycle isnegligible and changes in the cycle cannot bereversed by human activity.
Adverse climatic trends will increase, mitigation
can perhaps be expected within a horizon of
centuries.
Interest in the large water cycle, which seems
difficult to influence, is dominant while thesignificance of the small water cycle is trivialized.
The reason for extreme weather effects is global
warming .
Global warming and extreme weather effects are
inextricably linked.
Global warming is the main climatic problem forhumanity.
Vegetation is not ideal from the viewpoint of global
warming because it has a low albedo (reflectivity);water vapor again increases the greenhouse effect.
Speaks about the atmosphere as a greenhousecovering of the Earth.
56

New water paradigm
An important factor in global warming may be thechange in the water cycle caused by the drying andsubsequent warming of continents through humanactivity.
The subject of research is the impact of changes in
the water cycle on global warming.
Urbanization, industrialisation and economic
exploitation of a country (over about 40% of thearea of the continents) has a fundamental impact on
the influence of the water cycle.
The impact of humanity on the water cycle is atpresent considerable and its changes can go in both
directions.
If the new approach to water is applied, a possible
recovery of the climate can be expected within
decades.
Interest in the small water cycle dominates.
The reason for extreme weather effects are changes
in the water cycle.
Global warming can exist without extremes ofweather, extremes of weather can exist without
global warming.
Extremes of weather are the main climatic problem
for humanity.
Water and vegetation alleviate unwanted
temperature differences; cloudiness moderates theintensity of solar radiation falling on the Earth's
surface.
Speaks about the atmosphere as a protective
covering for the Earth.

Epictetus, The Handbook. Svoboda, 1972, pgs. 27 – 28

72

Rising ocean levels are a result of melting icebergs.

Rainwater is an inconvenience and needs to bequickly removed.
The main source and reserve of water is surface
water.
There is an impersonal attitude by owners and usersof land (citizens, companies and offices) towards
rainwater in a territory.
Water is used only once for one purpose and then is
sluiced away.
Water supplied to communities primarily through asystem of mains with "potable" quality water.
Mutual isolation of public policies in relation towater.
A sectoral approach to managing water resourceson land.

Rising ocean levels are a result of melting glacierson land, but also of a decrease in soil moistures,levels of groundwater and the state of other waters
on landmasses.
Rainwater is an asset that needs to be retained insoil/plants.57
The main source and reserve of water isgroundwater.
A change in the anonymous approach to rainwater
on an individual's land and the creation of a spirit ofshared responsibility for water resources.
Water can be used for more purposes, then purified
and recycled.58
Water supplied through a system divided into
potable and utility water.
Policies in relation to water are based on a thoroughperception of water in the scope of a functioning
water cycle in a country.
Integrated management of water resources in aterritory.

In the year 2000 Axel Kleidon, Klaus Fraedrich and Martin Heimann presented theresults of mathematical modeling of global climate on our planet from the two extremesof conditions: 1.) The simulation of a "Desert World," in which, applying the current
distribution of oceans and continents, values corresponding to the parameters of thedesert surface were placed on all unglaciated landmasses; and 2.) The simulation of a"Green planet," in which land surfaces were covered with vegetation.59 Even though weare aware that each such model is a simplification of reality, the results of the modelingare still very interesting.
Precipitation over land of the "Green Planet" was twice that of over the "Desert World."
On the "Green Planet," where evapotranspiration was up to three times higher and thecontent of water vapor in the atmosphere a third higher, there was paradoxically about aquarter less surface runoff than in the "Desert World." The average annual surface
temperature over the entire "Green Planet" (including the oceans) was about 0.3 °C lower
than in the "Desert World and the surface temperature on land 1.2 °C lower. Above theland of the "Green Planet" there was about 8% more cloud cover. It's interesting that thegreater cloud cover on the "Green Planet" caused slightly less evaporation from theoceans and slightly less precipitation over them. The greater cloud cover on the "Green
Planet" caused only approximately 5% more absorption of solar radiation, which issurprisingly small in view of the more than 20% difference in the albedo of both worlds.
The most important changes occurred in large expanses of the arid regions of Africa,
South Asia and Australia, where, in the "Green Planet" simulation, a forest climate wascreated.
57"A Paradigm Shift for Water Management." Rocky Mountain Institute, www.rmi.org
ibid.
59
A. Kleidon, K. Fraedrich and M. Heimann. "A Green Planet Versus a Desert World: Estimating theMaximum Effect of Vegetationon the Land Surface Climate," Climatic Change 44, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, pgs. 471 – 493, 2000
58

73

Fig. 27 The course of destruction of the small water cycle over land until it is halted
and then renewed to its original stateFig. 28 Diagram of the expansion of deserts or semideserts with the breakdown of
the small water cycle

74Fig. 29 Waterholding measures on the edge of critical areas
Their role is to harvest and hold water from the small water cycle from adjacent lands, orwater from the large water cycle (even in deserts it rains occasionally). The period inwhich the water cycle is renewed depends on circumstances (the hydrological andpedological conditions, success of the growth of protective vegetation, etc.).

Fig. 30 Decreasing areas of desert
The climate recovers in an area with a renewed small water cycle and it can possibly be
used as a forefront for further expansion of the hydrological recovery of land.

75

7 INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE USE OF
RAINWATER"To all the aristocracy and towns, I hereby issue an order to build ponds industriously,
first to provide an abundance of fish to feed the people, and secondly to secure the betteruse of the land - to gather marsh and morass water, so that it might be evaporated by thesun and by warm winds and as a water vapor to fully benefit the surrounding vegetation.
Furthermore, a pond is to retain a large amount of water in times of lasting rains or
melting snow, and in doing so, shall avert the sudden flooding of downstream lands."
Charles IV, Czech king and Holy Roman emporer, 1356
The Wallachian colonization of Slovakia was accompanied by brutal deforestation.
Despite this fact, one can learn learn from their water conservation measures, which
effectively compensated for the negative consequences of their activities on the runoff ofwater from the land. Part of this chapter is devoted to a relatively simple solution for
harvesting rainwater on land, through which the new water paradigm promises to returnthe lost equilibrium to the water cycle in nature and to temper the negative weather
phenomena which trouble mankind today. The application of the new water paradigm inpractice (its implementation) cannot be done, however, without the appropriate
legislative, organizational and financial measures on local, national and international
levels. In this part, we will show ways of reforming our relationship towards water infavour of policies reflecting a whole new culture in our civilization’s attitude towards this
precious resource.

7.1 The conservation of rainwater in our history
The conservation of rainwater on land is not a new idea. Human beings Harvesting
have collected and held atmospheric water throughout the millennia. andIndia has a 4000-year-old tradition of harvesting rainwater for domestic conservation
consumption and agricultural use, while in China the tradition is even of water inolder (6000 years). The cisterns for the harvesting of rainwater the distantpastmentioned in the Bible were spread throughout the entire Mediterranean.
In semi-arid regions, such cisterns existed in every village and their demolition byenemies made the territory uninhabitable. The Phoenicians and Carthaginians practiced
the harvesting of rainwater from the roofs of homes 500 years before Christ, while the
Venetians were long dependent on such technology for obtaining water, as were anumber of other nations, too.60
60

Brad Lancaster, "Rainwater Harvesting for Drylands," pg. 776People used diverse methods for conserving water and these differed Diverse
depending on the surroundings, the need for water and the available methods
possibilities. The drier the surroundings, the more sophisticated themethods people had to develop (for example, the technology for harvesting water onsloped microbasins used by the residents of the Negev Desert or by the Native Americans
in what is today the southwest part of the United States). In lands rich in water, where it
was necessary to protect the soil on slopes from water erosion, the creation of terraces
developed. This method is known particularly in connection with the paddy fields ofChina, but has also been used, to a greater or lesser extent, in various other parts of theworld, including Slovakia. Terracing is among the most interesting methods of retaining
water because it utilizes the infiltration of water into the soil and the free exchange ofwater between the soil and the atmosphere through vegetation.
As we have already mentioned, the central part of Europe did not suffer
Development
droughts in the past thanks to the presence of climax forest. The of agriculture
principal shift from natural land to cultured land in the region took place in Slovakia
around the 13th century through the development of agriculture, inwhich most of the population was employed. Changes in the organization of landownership, particularly in the distribution of specific land, hitherto uncultivated, toindividual users, had a decisive impact on agriculture. The basic production units were
smallholdings whose acreage sufficed for sustaining the family of the producers. For
early medieval tracts (farmsteads and demesnes), the struggle for self-sufficiency was
typical. With an increase in the population, however, the land was divided between morefamilies (whether owners or users) and tiny tracts of land originated. Land aroundindividual settlements, separated from neighbors by firm or vegetational lanes, createdvillage territories divided into several parts: into fields for sowing winter and spring
wheat, into fallow lands which were an accessory to pasture land, into meadows, into
pasturage and into forest tracts. Each such independent unit fulfilled a proportional
component of water management, from which it followed that if each user of the land
retained water individually on his own territory, then the whole area was equallysaturated with water.
An increase in economic growth occurred during the 14th century after Wallachian
the settling and permanent settlement of the territory. We encounter the colonization
first Wallachian colonists, then predominantly Ruthenian-Ukrainian(partially also Polish) settlers, a few of Balkan-Romanian origin who
penetrated into the Uh river region and afterwards the Zemplín, Šariš and Spiš regions.
They gradually merged to form permanent settlements and found villages. To a great
extent, this involved territory 300 to 600 meters above sea level which previously had
been only sparsely settled or was not settled at all. Wallachian settlements on Slovak
territory, which typically were based on farmsteads located on mountain ridges (also inthe middle of forests around springs and so expanding deforested areas), extended acrossgreat parts of the present-day territory of the state. They were built up in the White
Carpathians and Javorník mountains in the Slovakia-Moravia borderlands while the large
forests of Central Slovakia, as well as the upper Nitra and upper Tekov valley, were alsosignificantly reduced by their activities. In the 14th century, Wallachian breeding77

(pasturing) of livestock became increasingly common and meant The need for
economic exploitation of highlands which were unsuitable for conservation
agricultural cultivation. And here we can observe a gradual and andsystematic building up of untilled boundaries (separating fields) antierosion
preventing the spontaneous erosion of soil. This measure was a rational measurescompensation for the destructive deforestation of the territory(predominately by uprooting and burning). We can still see today in the Spiš region, forexample, largely bare peaks altered by these water conservation barriers.
In remote, particularly submontane regions of this territory, there can Functionality
still be seen traditional terraced land where characteristic narrow belts of of oldland divided by untilled boundaries lie in horizontal lines along sloped measuresterrain, which, thanks to its inaccessibility, was not affected bycommunist collectivization. Regardless of their long-term neglected state, these areminute patchwork territories of ecological stability, which despite long-term
deforestation, demonstrate considerable vitality. We also find similar territory in thesurrounding countries of Central Europe. Remarkably well preserved is the character ofthe cultivated land in Transylvania (today's Central Romania), for example, where a giant
mosaic of tiny fields resembles the structure of the gently differentiated and mutuallycomplementary cells of healthy tissue. Despite the fact that the majority of local
watercourses are not regulated, this "backward" part of Romania has not been affectedeven when the rest of the country has had to battle with destructive flooding (Fig. 31).
Partitioning of agricutural land, which for centuries created a living and Ignoring theworking environment for our ancestors, reflected not only on land experience ofownership relations but also on a particularly mature and viable structure ancestors
that allowed for different forms of land husbandry. The ability of theland to retain and evaporate water was in the past significantly higher despite the fact thatpartitioning of land was not developed for this particular purpose. The intensive
economic activities of humanity in such a system did not interfere with the natural water
cycle on land because it was compensated by measures which preserved the ability of theland to retain water. This system of cell arrangement, dating back to the "dark" Middle
Ages, has, however, changed over the last few decades into a vast monoculture, thedictate of "scientific" theories and "the invisible hand of the market" variously combining
to bring about this change. The land has become monotonous and less structured, today’s
gigantic drained areas around human settlements, monocultural agriculture on vast andundivided fields, decimated forests and regulated watercoursess all having lost the ability
to retain water in a country.

787.2 The principles, methods and advantages of conserving
rainwater on land
If humanity realizes that the impact it has had on the land has accelerated the runoff of
rainwater, surface water and subsurface water and thus damaged the small water cycle inall the ways mentioned in this publication, it should be prepared to take measures for the
renewal and recovery of this cycle. The essence of a practical solution to the problems ofclimate change and water shortages caused by human activity is the renewability of thesmall water cycle by human activity through a full implementation of comprehensive
measures in individual communities and towns. These involve measures which will limit
the accelerated runoff of water, increase the water-conservation capability of watersheds
and improve the water balance in the region. These measures are often identical to antierosion measures. Rainwater harvesting in the places where rain falls, before its drops
become part of an uncontrollable current, are excellent means of flood prevention. These
are simple measures in the field, similar to certain land planning and land modelingprocesses.
These measures have a technological, biotechnical and technologicalpreventative character. Technological measures include absorption Technologicaland biotechnicalditches through contouring (lengthways shallow drainage ditches), the measures
use of sloped depressions as absorption and reservoir areas, thebuilding of depressions, absorption pits, waterholdings and limans,
improvement of surfaces and the conservation and infiltration of rainwater, small dams orwells for watercourses, streams in gulches or ravines, the building and maintaining of dry
reservoirs, polders, keeping and using the meanders of watercourses and blind tributaries,
objects for linear protected dams for the discharging of water into flood plains, thebuilding of small weirs for water reservoirs and ponds, the damming of streams and antierosion measures in forests and the like (Fig. 32, 33, 34, 35, 36). Biotechnologicalmeasures are similar but barriers to surface runoffs are associated with the use ofvegetation—borders, grassy belts, belts of shrubbery and trees, unused grassy andforested areas and the like.
Examples of technological-preventive and economic measures could
Technologicalbe the application of favorable procedures for protecting the soil (for preventive
example, contour plowing), ensuring the replenishment of water measures
sluiced away from a territory, the limiting of non-vegetation hardsurfaces in built-up areas, replacing impermeable surfaces with permeable ones,
constructing protective barrages further from the centers of water flows, forbidding theclear-cutting of forests, the protection of forests from damaging insects (for example,
bark beetles), optimal structure and quality of forests, land-planning or a new division ofagricultural ground, the applying of integrated management and a more sensitive use of
the land with the view towards conservation and anti-erosion measures and the like.
With the conservation of water on land a number of principles need to be kept in mind.
The first of these is the principle of solidarity (the principle of water tolerance), whichmeans that along with the design and implementation of measures which have an impact
79

on the runoff conditions from a territory, it is necessary to take into Tolerance,account the whole watershed area. Measures implemented in one partnership,
territory cannot worsen the situation downstream or upstream in the subsidiarity
watershed region. The principle of partnership means that an analysis of
the situation in the area of runoff levels from a territory (community, town, region,watershed and the like) and important decisions related to proposed measures forincreasing the water-conservation ability of a catchment area and decreasing the processof erosion, only take place after discussions and mutual agreement of all deciding
partners in the basin—administrators of water flows, agriculturalists, forest rangers,
representatives of communities and town, landowners and experts. Anti-erosion projects
and technological measures for increasing the water conservation capability of a water
catchment area should be prepared and carried out in a partnership. The principle ofsubsidiarity as defined in the Middle Ages and applied in the EU, in this case means thatwith practical administration and protection of water resources in a territory and in awatershed, that what can be done better by a lower level of public administration shouldbe left to be handled on this level. This principle points to the need for effective
decentralization of activities which can be better, faster and more cheaply handled by
local or regional self-government.
Alongside the previous principles, which are bound up with human
Renewing theactivities, we can also mention the principle of autoregulation of autoregulation
natural processes, which means that the effect of an initial and one- of natural
time investment into the implementation of measures aimed at processes
improving the water balance in an area should gradually each year
show an improved quality of the natural environment and should raise the effectivenessof other local measures implemented in the territory. The principle of a sustainable
solution is bound together with this principle. Carrying out these mentioned measures
helps eliminate some of the reasons for unwanted climate changes caused by humanactivities. Thus, better living conditions and a better environment for future generations
will be created, the natural potential of the territory will remain the same and theprotective and autoregulating functions of ecosystems will be preserved.

7.3 The civil sector
Alexis de Tocqueville, in his work Democracy in America from the first The citizen –half of the 19th century, wrote that while in France the government was the mostat the forefront of great new projects and in England the aristocracy, in important andthe United States it was civic associations that performed this function.61 institutions
In a democratic society the most important "institution" is the citizen. He
has a far more important function, but also greater responsibility, than a citizen in a nondemocratic society. And just as we believe more in a great number of humble drops ofrain than in their concentration in rivers, the will and the conviction of common citizens
has, in the application of the new water paradigm, greater meaning than the decrees of61

Alexis de Tocqueville. Democracy in America, II, Chapter V

80government (although the government, like the river, also has its function). Similarly, as
in all other cases, in the case of the conservation of water on land, the tasks andauthorities should be divided in agreement with the principle of subsidiarity; that is,institutions on a higher level should handle a given item only when it cannot be more
effectively resolved on a lower level. The need to conserve water in a country is
worldwide, and therefore institutions on all levels, including national and international,
should be involved. This all depends, however, on the initiative of citizens and theirability to determine which activities they can manage themselves (those whereintervention from above would be counterproductive) and which they would need help
from higher levels with. The individual citizen, or a citizen in association with others, has
an "open space" in which to do more than just his duty.
Citizens who embrace the thinking of the new water paradigm will Possible
advocate the protection of water in their own living space and actively involvement
demand from public administration the preparation and realization of of citizens
measures aimed at the renewal of the water cycle in an area. Citizens ofcities and communities will see the water in their own surroundings as thethermoregulator of climatic conditions and rainwater as the main "provider" of sufficientwater resources in the region. They will support the need for building catchment areas,
depressions and evaporation surfaces for the renewal of the country and land-planningpurposes. They will request a separated supply of drinking and of utility water and willencourage repeated use of water.
Non-profit organizations which embrace the thinking of the new water Opportunities
paradigm will inform the public about the need for a new approach to for non-profit
water and call for access to information about the application of the new organizations
approach in practice. They can initiate different local projects aimed at
improving public and civic interest in water resources in the region (projects, forinstance, aimed at cleaning a river and its surroundings, foresting unused plots of land,
projects with slogans such as: “Let's not pay for the sluicing away of rainwater, let'sconserve water in an area“, projects aimed at cleaner groundwater, better use of utility
water for different purposes, and the protection of drinking water). Some of them canfocus on encouraging leadership and on building the capacity of civic and community
involvement in the given problem. In addition, they can create a new space for thedevelopment of business philanthropy and donations towards implementation of the new
approach to water, both for developed, as well as for developing countries.
Owners and co-owners of flats, buildings and property within the Property
residential areas of municipalities and towns should create water owners
societies in the interest of coordinating and ensuring the retention of
rainwater on built-up land. In rural areas outside of towns and municipalities, particularly
in agricultural and forested areas, water cooperatives aimed at retaining water in an area
could be established through the active participation of the owners and users of theselands. Local councils could then become responsible for coordinating such measureseffectively. Meanwhile, independent owners of neighboring buildings and property in the
territories of individual towns and municipalities can, among themselves, establish water81

societies and cooperatives, if such a form of cooperation makes it easier to to carry out
technical and biotechnical measures aimed at increasing the water-conservation
capability of catchment areas and decreasing the process of erosion in the given territory.
Cooperation is also required for the maintenance of such established systems. Antierosion and water-conservation measures serve for the long-term protection andimprovement of their own property.
Independent media could focus on the hitherto neglected importance of Independent
water in discussions about climate changes. If the media were to media
embrace the principles of the new water paradigm, they could become"watchdogs" guarding against the indifferent and exploitative treatment of water on land,
treatment which, in various ways, is damaging the interests of the majority of the
population.

7.4 The economic sector
Thanks to its economic and management dimension, the new water Innovation
paradigm represents a fundamental innovation in current economic and a noble
practice and is thus becoming a basis for new economic thinking and impulse
knowledge. At the same time it provides a noble and socially usefulimpulse for the economic sector as well as an asset for private and state water
management, agriculture and forestry companies. Since from the viewpoint of the newwater paradigm land managers are important, it will be in their interest to ensuresufficient water resources, minimize extreme weather and increase the economic
usefulness of the land. They are important socio-economic partners in preparation of
integrated management plans for watersheds as well as in their implementation. Usually
they promote only "sector" policies, but in the new water paradigm, they will take on anumbrella role in the integration of management of water resources on land.
It is necessary to accelerate the preparation for integrated management Integratedof surface water and rainwater on land and its implementation through management
involvement of the coordination centers in close cooperation with local andgovernment. Water companies could focus on building a dual system for coordination
the supply of drinking and utility water in an area and decentralized centerssystems for purifying sewage water with the use of different
recirculation systems. The water removed from a territory could, after multiple uses, bepurified and returned to the ecosystem.
Adopting the new paradigm will create space for employers to carry out
A meaningfuljobs which are relatively simple and undemanding but unprecedented in increase inscale. These will be both in the public and their own interest in terms of employment
protection of property (soil, buildings, moveable objects). Employing
workers for the preparation, implementation and maintenance of anti-erosion and water
conservation measures means valuable employment opportunities both in the affluent and82the developing world. This can then serve as an impulse for economic and social growth
and the elimination of poverty in economically weak regions and in regions withinsufficient sources of water.
A new challenge will arise for landscape engineers, architects, urbanists, Land
construction engineers and planners, because a new era of zoning and planninglandscape planning for populations and whole regions will dawn. The
need will arise for a thorough local reappraisal of drainage relations and the design ofanti-erosion and water conservation measures on the land. Opportunities will arise forrating agencies to make independent evaluations of an area's water balance and to
determine its value and competitiveness from the viewpoint of water resources. Withknowledge of the new paradigm, scientific communities could devote their attention to adetailed mapping of the mechanism of the water cycle as well as to predictions of climatechange patterns.
In building greenfield sites and residential buildings, in restoring and Developers
renewing original historic and urban structures, and in rebuilding old
and building from scratch new industrial parks, shopping andamusement centers, developers should include in the urban and architectural strategies ofsuch projects the two key principles: "Retain water on these plots of land!" and "Allow it
to evaporate and infiltrate into the soil!“ Retaining rainwater and creating greeneryshould be two of the main ways of making the environments of building centers andparks more attractive.
Construction, garden and design companies can use the impulse of theConstruction
new water paradigm to implement local flood prevention measures, to companies
renew the water regime in an area and to apply new approaches andtechnologies which create good conditions for conserving, absorbing
and evaporating rainwater in combination with vegetation. Supply companies can focus
on widening their assortment of machinery, materials, technologies and services, all ofwhich will be needed to carry out these measures in the field, as well as to ensure theirsubsequent maintenance.
The new paradigm creates the need for rapid financing of preparedprojects and the implementation of conservation and anti-erosion Banks andinsurancemeasures in a territory. The banking sector can help through a system of companies
loans to the public as well as to the private sector. In recent years
insurance companies have registered a sharp growth in insurance events, so they could
focus on supporting the creation of authorized centers which will allow anyone to gain
the knowledge needed for assessing the state of the water cycle over their own territoryand property, as well as for preparing and taking necessary measures in the field. They
can add to their range of services complex new products with suitable motivational
schemes for their clients.

837.5 Public sector institutions
The relationship of society to water up till now can be understood as a Current
combination of mutually isolated policies and of various personal approach
attitudes and approaches (the obtaining and discharging of water, the versus EU
production and supply of drinking water, purifying waste water, water policy
for agriculture, water for manufacture and industry, surface water andbodies of water, protection from floods, water for firefighting, household drinking water,water for my garden, rainwater from my roof, etc.). The sectoral, departmental andprofessional approach has hitherto been characterized by interior and mutual isolation(expert, professional and supplier-purchaser) and by the strictly limited authority ofseparate bodies of public administration. Each office deals with water from one specificpoint of view. The EU general directive on water (Directive 2000/60/EC) attempts to go
beyond such an approach, however, and points out the need for one which is more
integrated.
Through the acceptance of the new water paradigm, the protection, The paradigm
perception and use of water becomes genuinely integrated and holistic in as a
the context of recognizing the significance of the water cycle and the framework
conditions of the given catchment area. Understanding the basic for an
circulation of water in nature is relatively simple and can be precisely integrated
approachdescribed and quantified. The adaptation of this knowledge for politicaldecisions, however, requires a fundamentally qualitative and systematictransformation of traditionally isolated local water management policies into ones which
are fully integrated. For administrators of water basins, an opportunity arises toreevaluate the management of administered bodies of water and the infrastructure in theregion. In the sense of the new water paradigm, they can emphasize flood prevention(anti-erosion measures and measures for increasing the water retentiveness of all
microcatchments in the administered territory), and thus create, in cooperation with local
government, an institutional starting point for the integrated management of watersheds.
Educational institutions should include knowledge of the new water
Opportunities
paradigm in the curriculum both at schools and at centers of adult forlearning and also connect such education with the needs of people educationalalready working in these fields. This includes support for education of institutions
local government representatives and support for international exchange
programs. The study of water in the context of the new water paradigm could also
become a subject of study at universities and faculties. Such a subject would havescientific, research and above all study programs typical for other university subjects.
Towns and municipalities are key partners in the practical introduction
Opportunitiesof the new approach to water and the implementation of the necessary for towns andtechnologies, biotechnologies and economic measures in a region. They municipalities
can be highly effective in pushing through the relevant measures on theirterritories at the same time as respecting the principles of partnership, solidarity andsubsidiarity. Above all, towns and municipalities must endure the results of floods and84

climate changes which decrease their competitiveness. They should therefore focus onpromoting an intersectoral and integrated approach towards renewal of the water cycle on
their own territories as a starting point for the economic development of their locality. In
practice, this means carrying out studies and projects aimed at: increasing the water
conservation capability of the territory (within the community or outside of it); lowering
water-caused soil erosion; creating and fulfilling motivational economic programs forresidents and landowners in the region (regional administration can, for example, provide
special tax relief and one-off subsidies for every 1 m3 water conservation space created orfor an anti-erosion alteration to lands on community land); or for judging the impacts ofinvestment activities on the runoff levels in an area. Neighboring settlements,
associations of towns and municipalities, as well as whole regions, can create andcoordinate a common system of flood prevention and encourage the creation of their own
consulting, informational and competency centers for towns and municipalities and forowners of land and buildings. This cooperation could take the form of "self-administeredbasins" organized within the borders of hydrological watersheds.
The essence of the measures which need to be passed on the national Opportunities
level is the implementation of structural reforms for water management forand economic policies (including agricultural and forestry policies) government
which influence the runoff conditions on a territory. The new water policy
policy should focus on the overall protection of the territory with a focus
on improving the water balance through the passing of measures aimed at increasing thewater retentiveness of a watershed and decreasing processes of erosion. The state should
create the conditions and a framework for the systematic integration of hitherto isolated
sectoral policies relating to water and the associated harmonization of subsidy policies. A
complex approach to water requires passing a new generation of laws, including
acceptance of a law on the protection and renewal of the small water cycle in land, which
would lead, in addition to other things, to an assessment of the influences of investment
activities on the water balance of a territory. New financial, supportive and motivational
instruments for the implementation of the new approach to water can then arise. The statebudget can provide support for the application of anti-erosion and water conservation
measures, support for the preparation and implementation of community projects, as wellas support for research activities and the monitoring of newly proposed and implemented
measures in a region.
If a community of states (the European Union) and global institutions Opportunities(for example, the United Nations) embrace the new water paradigm, forthey could assert their authority and declare their support for a new international
approach to the protection and conservation of rainwater on land. In institutions
some cases, these institutions have the powers of international law intheir hands, powers which, if needed, could be used, of course, in appropriate measureand in respect to the principle of subsidiarity. Just as the UN was able to mobilize itself
into supporting research into the relationship between climate changes and greenhousegases (IPCC) and into specific steps in the implementation of the conclusions of thisstudy (for example, the Kyoto Protocol), it should act similarly with respect to the role ofwater and the need to renew the small water cycles over the continents. The updating of85

developmental aid from countries or communities of states to developing countries could
gain this new dimension. In the interest of monitoring processes, it would be necessary to
add to the list of indicators of sustainable development in Agenda 21 monitoring of therenewal of the small water cycle over land (over continents, regions, settlements) and
implementation of comprehensive systematic measures for increasing the water
retentiveness and comprehensive anti-erosion measures. The renewal of the small water
cycle and the integrated management of water resources in catchment areas could becomea new pillar of agricultural, forestry and water management practice, of a policy ofsolidarity and of the policy for rural development (giving opportunities for a moremeaningful reform of the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU). The currently running
campaign of the European Commission, Your Impact on Climate Changes through four
activities—slow down, switch off, walk and recycle—could be expanded to include a
fifth activity—conserve rainwater on land.
"The day is not far away when it will be considered wrong for an engineer inexpert inbiology, and especially in ecology, to go into the countryside with a sliderule and theintention of altering it…The natural landscape has been so violated by these alterations,left so shabby and superficially civilized,, that soon everyone will feel the need to returnto our countryside its true meaning and value. But how to do it? A simple return to its
original state is not possible. We cannot efface the population from the surface of the
Earth, nor can we decrease its economic progress, standard of living and involvement inglobal production processes. We cannot annul any of what has distinguished our age
from the period one hundred years ago. On the contrary, we have to lift everything to ahigher level. That is why we cannot keep the countryside in a stage of economic
primitivism. Nothing remains but to alter the current state of the country, but to alter it
more intelligently, more naturally, more professionally. And this is a task so noble that
all missions of the nineteenth century pale before it."Vladimír Úlehla, 194762

7.6 Financial costs and the assessment of scenarios
The economic and systematic assessment of the advantages of the new Undemanding
water paradigm can be divided into three areas—these are balance financiallycalculations, economic calculations and the assessment of social and and timewise
environmental costs and benefits of individual scenarios. Balancecalculations allow for the monitoring of the water balance of a territory and the analysis
of weather patterns (temperature patterns, precipitation totals, the progress of waterrunoff from a territory, changes in the groundwater levels, changing
levels of soil dampness, the frequency and incidence of extreme weather Aspects ofevents). Economic calculations of the separate projected patterns include assessing
advantages
adaptation costs, damage caused by extreme weather events and a fall in
62

Cited from the publication of Míchal I. Ecological Stability, pg. 217, Veronica, Brno, 1994

86

the economic performance of an area. The assessment of social and environmental
aspects also includes various assets which cannot be easily expressed financially.
The two primary scenarios from the viewpoint of the new water
The IPCC
paradigm are derived from the most widely assumed reasons for climate scenariochange. The scenario emerging from the decisive role of the growth ofCO2 concentrations in the atmosphere,63 which is the widely preferredtheory both scientifically and politically, assumes that adapting and improving
technology in order to lower emissions of CO2 is a necessary step in responding toclimate change. This scenario indicates that by the end of the 21st century, the following
are to be expected: an increase in global temperatures on the surface of the Earth of 5 to 6
°C; a rise in sea levels of 50–100 cm; a growth in extreme weather events; economic
damage costing up to1–5% of the annual gross domestic product of every country, with apossible acceleration of up to 20% in the most unfavorable circumstances.64 Thus far, not
all the financial costs of adaptation are known; their gradual rise is expected, however.
The scenario emerging from the decisive role of water in the recovery of Scenarios
the climate through the renewal of the small water cycle takes a more with the use
active approach, and in the case of worldwide implementation of the of water
new water paradigm’s measures, promises a fundamental, across-theboard decrease in extreme weather events on land, a more uniform spreading of
precipitation over the continents, effective protection from flood and drought, thestabilizing of the climate in rural and urban environments, enough water for the growth of
the world population, as well as a decrease in economic damage caused by extreme
weather events. With regard to the increase in the global temperature of the Earth and therise in sea levels, it promises a moderating of their rise to that extent to which they comefrom human activities in transformation of the surface of the land. In the understanding of
the new water paradigm, this is a significant part of what humanity is really able toinfluence.
The new water paradigm represents, both in terms of time and money, a manageable
investment in relation to the stabilization of the climate and the provision of sufficientwater. For implementation of the necessary measures in a country, investment costs
worth roughly 0.1% of a country's annual GDP should suffice for a program lasting 10-15
years. These costs are equivalent to the costs needed for the preparation andimplementation of comprehensive flood prevention measures (anti-erosion and water
conservation measures) in a region. The average costs for the renewal of the small water
cycle (increasing water conservation capabilities of watersheds and decreasing erosion
processes) in a unit of land depend on its character, morphology and the need forintervention. There are diverse technological and biotechnical measures which do not
require massive investments and investment construction. On the contrary, they are
undemanding and utilize local materials and the local labour force. The maintaining of
measures implemented in a territory would be handled by landowners. This would cost,
however, only a relatively small amount and would create a useful level of primary and6364

http://www.ipcc.ch/
http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/87subsequently secondary employment on a global level. The average costs for
implementation of the new water paradigm for each square kilometer of land therefore
represents 0.1% of the annual GDP of a country multiplied by the number of years
needed for implementation and then divided by the area of the region (in km2). Thisapproach is less expensive than any other solutions which have already been tried or
proposed.

88Fig. 31 Terraced slopes in Romania's Transylvania region
Territories altered by this ancient method showed an admirable resistance to flooding.

Fig. 32 An example of cascade ground tanks for rainwater harvesting on slopes

89Fig. 33 A diagram of technological measures for the protection of land against
erosion and for rainwater harvesting and conservation on land

Fig. 34 Detail of a pipe for taking rainwater to a gravel spall drain65
Utilized for the infiltration of rainwater from the roofs of houses to the soil and subsoil.

65

City of Tucson – Water Harvesting Guidance Manual, Ordinance Number 10210, October 2005, page 16

90Fig. 35 A Water Forest in the High Tatras – building water conservation measureson territory destroyed by a natural disasterAn example of the renewal of vegetation and hydrological stabilization of a territory
through the conservation of water on land.

Fig. 36 The KVP housing estate in Košice – protection of buildings under a slopewith the help of earthen bunds along contour lines

91

8 CLOSING SUMMARY
The circulation of water in nature takes place through the large and Disruption ofsmall water cycles. Humanity, through its activities and systematic the balance oftransformation of natural land into cultured land, accelerates the runoff the waterof rainwater from land. Limiting evaporation and the infiltration of cycle
water into the soil decreases the supply of water to the small water cycle. The equilibriumof the water balance in the small water cycle is thus disturbed and it gradually starts tobreak down over land.
If there is insufficient water in the soil, on its surface and in plants, Climatic
immense flows of solar energy cannot be transformed into the latent heat change, theof water evaporation but are instead changed into sensible heat. The growth of
surface of the ground soon overheats, and as a result, a breakdown in the weather
supply of water from the large water cycle arises over the affected land. extremes
Local processes over huge areas inhabited and exploited by humanbeings are changed into global processes and with processes that occur without theassistance of human beings; together they create the phenomenon known as global
climate change. The part of global climate change caused by human activities then islargely based on the drainage of water from the land, the consequent rise in temperature
differences triggering off mechanisms which cause a rise in climatic extremes. The
disruption of the small water cycle is accompanied by growing extremes in the weather, agradual drop in groundwater reserves, more frequent flooding, longer periods of drought
and an increase in the water shortage in the region.
The part of climatic change which is the result of human activities Opportunity(draining of a region), can be reversed through systematic human for renewal ofactivity (the watering of a region). The watering of land can be achieved the water
through saturation of the small water cycle over land by ensuring cycle
comprehensive conservation of rainwater and enabling its infiltrationand evaporation. This can help achieve the renewal of the small water cycle over a region
and fundamentally change the trend of changing climatic conditions: it can—to reverse
the trend of regional warming—temper extreme weather events and ensure a growth inwater reserves in the territory.
The renewal of the small water cycle over an area, however, depends not Relatively
only on the extent to which the area has been damaged but also on a undemanding
number of other factors. In the case of Slovakia, we can expect visible financiallyresults relatively soon (10 to 20 years) after implementation of these and timewisemeasures. The financial costs of these specific measures are moderatesums which can be allocated from state, public and private budgets. Support for the
implementation of far-reaching measures should be linked pro rata to each 1 m3 ofreservoir volume built in the ground or to anti-erosion measures carried out. The
implementation of water conservation measures should, until the renewal of the small
water cycle and the maximalization of a stable water balance in a region, replace previous
investment measures, which only served to accelerate the runoff of water from a region.
92

The conservation of rainwater on land "in situ" and the conducting away
Every drop
only of the natural surplus of water in a region is "condicio sine qua mattersnon"—a condition essential for ensuring environmental security, global
stability and the sustenance of economic growth. Fulfilling these conditions should be ofinterest to each individual and each community. This is the first time in the history ofhuman civilization when the impact of mankind's activities on the water cycle and thedecrease of amount of water in it will have to be evaluated. The statement of the Srí
Lankan king, Parakramabahu the Great—"Not even a single raindrop should be allowed
to flow into the sea without it first having been used for the benefit of the people..." —isthe best summing up of the new water paradigm, a statement which, in the coming
decades, should become a slogan for mankind calling for the preservation of civilization.

93

TEXT FOR THE BACK COVER:
Not even a single raindrop should be allowed to flow into the sea without it first having beenused for the benefit of the people...

King Parakramabahu the Great of Sri Lanka (1153 – 1186)
In his groundbreaking book, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of
Nations, Adam Smith introduced the example of smiths who, even with the greatest ofeffort, could not make more than one pin per day. The division of labour increased
production of pins twenty-fold and simple machines many thousand-fold, so that what
was once a luxury item soon became available to even the poorest of families. This book
is concerned primarily with the importance and origin of the wealth of water on land. Its
ambition is to change the current practice of draining water from large areas of land, a
process caused by deforestation, agricultural activities and the sluicing of rainwater out ofcities. The draining of land means decreasing evaporation, the transforming of solar
radiation into sensible heat and a change in the great flows of energy in the area. This has
an impact on the circulation of water on land and a rise in extreme weather events. The
authors of this publication see a solution to these problems in relatively simple rainwater
harvesting and water conservation measures, the kind that people in different parts of theworld applied for hundreds or even thousands of years. They served for the acquiring of
new sources of water and are often identical to flood prevention and anti-erosion
measures. With widespread use, they can multiply the amount of water which can be usedby people, nature and manufacturing; at the same time, they can temper micro- andmacroclimatic problems caused by the drainage of land and thus contribute to therecovery of the climate. The panel of authors, who all come from an environment of nongovernmental organizations, offer this book to anyone involved with water and its
management as well as to public sector institutions and private investors, and more orless every single citizen of our planet.

94