Open Access Review
Article

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56025

Ivermectin: A Multifaceted Drug With a Potential
Beyond Anti-parasitic Therapy
Baneet Kaur 1, Cyril Blavo 2 , Mayur S. Parmar 3

Received 01/18/2024
Review began 02/02/2024
Review ended 03/05/2024
Published 03/12/2024© Copyright 2024
Kaur et al. This is an open access article

1. Department of Medicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University,
Clearwater, USA 2. Department of Public Health, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern
University, Clearwater, USA 3. Department of Foundational Sciences, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic
Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Clearwater, USA

distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0.,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution,

Corresponding author: Mayur S. Parmar, mparmar@nova.edu

and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original author and source are credited.

Abstract
Ivermectin was first discovered in the 1970s by Japanese microbiologist Satoshi Omura and Irish
parasitologist William C. Campbell. Ivermectin has become a versatile pharmaceutical over the past 50 years.
Ivermectin is a derivative of avermectin originally used to treat parasitic infections. Emerging literature hassuggested that its role goes beyond this and may help treat inflammatory conditions, viral infections, andcancers. Ivermectin’s anti-parasitic, anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, and anticancer effects were explored. Its
traditional mechanism of action in parasitic diseases, such as scabies and malaria, rests on its ability tointerfere with the glutamate-gated chloride channels in invertebrates and the lack of P-glycoprotein
in many parasites. More recently, it has been discovered that the ability of ivermectin to block the nuclear
factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of the activated B (NF-κB) pathway that modulates the expression andproduction of proinflammatory cytokines is implicated in its role as an anti-inflammatory agent to treat
rosacea. Ivermectin has also been evaluated for treating infections caused by viruses, such as SARS-CoV-2
and adenoviruses, through inhibition of viral protein transportation and acting on the importin α/β1
interface. It has also been suggested that ivermectin can inhibit the proliferation of tumorigenic cells
through various pathways that lead to the management of certain cancers. The review aimed to evaluate its
multifaceted effects and potential clinical applications beyond its traditional use as an anthelmintic agent.

Categories: Preventive Medicine, Internal Medicine, Infectious Disease
Keywords: nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated b cells (nf-κb), malaria, anti-cancer, anti-viral,
anti-inflammatory, anti-parasitic, ivermectin

Introduction And Background
Since its discovery in the 1970s by the Japanese microbiologist Satoshi Omura and Irish parasitologist
William C. Campbell, ivermectin has become a versatile pharmaceutical. While well recognized for its use indiverse clinical settings, it has also had a profound humanitarian impact, treating millions of people,
particularly the most impoverished worldwide [1]. Ivermectin is a derivative of avermectin and is amacrocyclic lactone compound. The avermectins are isolated from the soil bacterium Streptomyces
avermitilis [2]. Since its inception, ivermectin has revolutionized the treatment and control of several
parasitic infections.
Ivermectin was made commercially available by the U.S.-based pharmaceutical company Merck Sharp andDohme (MSD) for use in veterinary medicine in 1981 [1]. Following its successful application as a powerfulanthelmintic agent in animals, ivermectin was recognized by scientists for its potential against a similar
human pathogen, Onchocerca volvulus. The drug was then developed and tested for its antiparasitic effects
in humans in a series of clinical trials [3-8]. These efforts culminated in the approval of ivermectin forhuman use, marking its introduction for therapeutic use in humans in the late 1980s [1,3]. Ivermectin was
first used to treat onchocerciasis, commonly known as river blindness, and has evolved as an agent of choice
for a broad range of parasitic infections.
The mode of action of ivermectin is based on its ability to selectively inhibit glutamate-gated chloride
channels (GluCls) at nanomolar concentrations in invertebrates [9-13]. These channels are not expressed invertebrates [2]. Inhibition of these channels affects feeding, motility, and reproduction [2]. At higher
concentrations, ivermectin can interact with several receptors in both invertebrates and vertebrates,
including gamma-aminobutyric acid, glycine, histamine, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors [2]. Throughits effects at high and low concentrations, ivermectin induces the death of parasitic agents. In humans andother vertebrates, the P-glycoprotein (P-gp), also known as the multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1),
exerts a protective effect [14,15]. It is expressed in the blood-brain barrier and acts as an efflux pump,shunting ivermectin out of the central nervous system (CNS) [15]. In some animals, such as dogs and horses,
the absence of P-gp can lead to toxicity, with manifestations of drowsiness, coma, and even death [2].
Oral ivermectin is the only approved route of administration for human use; however, recently, it has been

How to cite this article
Kaur B, Blavo C, Parmar M S (March 12, 2024) Ivermectin: A Multifaceted Drug With a Potential Beyond Anti-parasitic Therapy. Cureus 16(3):e56025. DOI 10.7759/cureus.56025

demonstrated to be efficacious topically [16-18]. It has a well-established safety profile in adults with asignificantly low rate of adverse reactions [19]. An exception to this is its well-documented risk in treating
loiasis and onchocerciasis, where the death of high loads of microfilaria may lead to severe encephalopathy[19]. Despite these concerns, there is literature documenting its safety in young children [2]. However, there
is still a lack of support in the literature regarding its safety in pregnant women, so its use is ill-advised inthis population.
Today, ivermectin is used to treat a wide range of nematode infections in humans, including onchocerciasis,strongyloidiasis, loiasis, ascariasis, filariasis, cutaneous larva migrans, gnathostomiasis and trichuriasis, andarthropod infestations caused by Sarcoptes scabiei, Demodex, and Pediculosis [1]. Ivermectin is currently
being evaluated and under extensive study in clinical trials for its potential use in treating mosquito-borneparasitic infections and as a complementary strategy for reduction through mass drug administration [2024]. Although its antiparasitic effects are well documented, the anti-inflammatory activity of ivermectin has
recently been uncovered [25]. This follows its approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) andthe European Union for the treatment of rosacea. Emerging literature highlights the potential use ofivermectin as a promising candidate for anticancer therapy [26-29]. Several studies have addressed its
antiviral activity against a diverse range of viruses, leading to its exploration for use in treating SARS-CoV-2
during the most recent global pandemic [30].
The field of medicine is constantly evolving, and it is important to continue updating our understanding ofdrug pharmacology and its potential applications. Ivermectin, which is traditionally used as an anthelmintic
agent, has been found to have a range of effects beyond its initial antiparasitic use. This review article aimed
to evaluate the multifaceted effects of ivermectin treatment and explore its potential clinical application forother diseases. Given the increasing evidence of the broad-spectrum activity of ivermectin, it is timely andnecessary to carry out this comprehensive review, potentially leading to more effective and versatile
therapeutic strategies in the future.

ReviewIn Table 1, we summarize the authorized and recommended uses of ivermectin by the FDA and World HealthOrganization (WHO), as well as its investigational status for various conditions.

2024 Kaur et al. Cureus 16(3): e56025. DOI 10.7759/cureus.56025

2 of 10

Therapeutic

FDA-

Investigational

indications

approved

research

Keynotes

Parasitic infections
Intestinal
strongyloidiasis(caused by✔️Strongyloides
stercoralis)
Onchocerciasis(river blindness
caused by

Only active against the tissue microfilariae of Onchocerca volvulus. No activity against adult O.

✔️volvulus.

Onchocerca
volvulus)
Lymphatic filariasis(caused byWuchereria

Important medication (WHO recommendation) as a part of mass drug administration regimen.
X✔️

Ivermectin is preferred to treat Lymphatic filariasis in areas with onchocerciasis. Primarily in
combination with other drugs, effective against the circulating microfilariae of W. bancrofti.

bancrofti)

Medication for scabies is now on the WHO essential medicines list. Ivermectin is not FDAScabies (caused by
Sarcoptes scabiei)X✔️

approved for scabies but is effective in treating infections caused by S. scabiei (scabies), crusted(Norwegian) scabies, or superinfected scabies. Ivermectin can be administered orally or topicallyusing a 0.5% lotion for these conditions.

Skin conditions
Rosacea(inflammatory skin

Topical application (product: 1% cream). Effective for papules and pustules (strong clinical trial✔️evidence, but only somewhat effective for flushing (weak clinical trial evidence).

condition)
Other potential uses (under investigation)
COVID-19 (caused
by SARS-CoV-2)
Adenoviruses
Autoimmune
diseases
CancerX✔️

Large-scale studies show inconclusive or negative results.

X✔️

Early-stage researchX✔️Limited and preliminary researchX✔️

Early-stage research

TABLE 1: Ivermectin, a multifaceted drug.
Summarizes the FDA-approved and investigational status of ivermectin for various conditions. Please note that this information is for informational
purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare professional for any questions or concerns. Also, research is
ongoing, so it’s important to stay informed about the latest developments.
FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; WHO, World Health Organization

Antiparasitic activity
The introduction of ivermectin as an antiparasitic agent in veterinary medicine paved the way for its use in
the treatment of parasitic infections in humans, which was its first established and known use in humans.
Ivermectin was initially introduced to treat onchocerciasis and has been shown to successfully control andeliminate infection through mass drug administration [2]. It has indications for use across a wide range ofother parasitic infections including, but not limited to, strongyloidiasis, loiasis, ascariasis, filariasis,
cutaneous larva migrans, gnathostomiasis, scabies, and pediculosis [1]. Approximately 250 million people
use ivermectin annually to control various parasitic diseases [16]. The mechanism of action of ivermectin inparasites relies on its ability to interfere with glutamate-gated chloride channels in invertebrates and thelack of P-gp in many parasites [9-13]. The next section will focus on the use of ivermectin in the treatment of
scabies, where it has been evaluated as a first-line agent, and examine its potential as an antimalarial agent.
Scabies2024 Kaur et al. Cureus 16(3): e56025. DOI 10.7759/cureus.56025

3 of 10

Scabies is a parasitic skin infestation caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei. It has recently been noted that its
incidence is increasing in humans [31-33]. Pregnant female mites dig deep into the upper layer of humanskin, the stratum corneum, and reside there for a lifetime of four to six weeks [34,35]. During this period,
they lay eggs that hatch in two to three days, producing larvae that mature within 9 to 17 days [34,35]. Malemites die shortly after, while the presence of female mites causes symptoms. Clinical signs and symptoms
generally worsen at night, including a significantly pruritic rash that is papular or papulo-esicular and often
symmetrically distributed [35]. Commonly affected areas include the axillae, interdigital spaces of the hands
and feet, waistlines, and buttocks. Microscopic scabies mite is transmitted primarily through direct andprolonged skin-to-skin contact with an infected person (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). An
infected host can spread scabies even in the absence of symptoms. It is crucial to note that the infestation isa strictly human-to-human transmission and that animals do not serve as vectors for human scabies.
First-line therapy for scabies has historically been topical permethrin, a synthetic pyrethrin, although recent
reports indicate the decreasing efficacy of this first-line agent [36,37]. Permethrin works by disrupting thesodium channel current across the neuronal membranes of mites. This disruption leads to delayed
repolarization, resulting in paralysis and, eventually, death of the mites. Other treatment options for scabies
include topical crotamiton, benzyl benzoate, 1% lindane lotion, or 10% sulfur [37]. Oral and topicalivermectin are approved treatment options for scabies [35,38]. The role of ivermectin against scabies is basedon its mode of action as an antiparasitic agent that selectively inhibits glutamate-gated chloride channels(GluCls) at lower concentrations in parasites. Through the inhibition of these channels, functions such as
feeding, motility, and reproduction are affected by the parasites and can lead to death.
A 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Dhana et al. found that oral ivermectin was lesseffective than 5% topical permethrin [39]. The authors reported that the combination therapy comprisingoral ivermectin and topical permethrin is safe and can even enhance the efficacy of each agent. The authors
also noted that topical ivermectin may have a similar efficacy profile to topical permethrin, but additional
conclusive studies still need to be conducted. The use of oral ivermectin needs to be further explored,
particularly in resistance treatment to topical permethrin or compliance issues. Oral ivermectin, topicalivermectin, and 5% permethrin were well tolerated and associated with low treatment failure rates [39]. Oral
ivermectin was compared to topical 1% lindane lotion, an organochloride insecticide, in a 2012 study
conducted by Mohebbipour et al. At the one-week interval, it was found that a single dose of oral ivermectin
was as effective as twice the application of 1% lindane lotion [40]. However, two doses of ivermectin wereshown to be superior to 1% lindane lotion at the four-week follow-up. These studies demonstrate thepotential of oral and topical ivermectin for effective scabies treatment. Notably, since ivermectin is the only
oral agent currently available for the treatment of scabies, where there are cost issues, lack of desire to use
topical agents, poor compliance with topical agents, or resistance to first-line therapies such as permethrin,
ivermectin may be a reasonable choice for the treatment of scabies.
Malaria
There has been growing interest in the potential use of ivermectin for malaria control. Malaria is a fatal
parasitic disease transmitted by the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito [41]. Of the five speciesof Plasmodium responsible for malaria, Plasmodium falciparum is considered the most lethal/predominant[41]. Patients often report symptoms such as fever, chills, headache, sweats, and malaise and may show signsof jaundice. Severe malaria can result in organ failure. Treatment commonly involves antimalarial drugs,
such as chloroquine or artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) [41].
The potential role of ivermectin in the management of malaria is through vector control and transmission.
The key to controlling infection is to prevent human-to-vector transmission of the Plasmodium parasite.
The Anopheles mosquito relies on glutamate-gated chloride channels for sensory and motor function [2].
Since ivermectin can selectively inhibit these glutamate-gated chloride channels, these essential functions
are inhibited in Anopheles mosquitoes, leading to death [42]. In humans, oral ivermectin has been shown toachieve serum concentrations that can kill mosquitoes after blood meal, preventing transmission of theplasmodium parasite to another person [43]. The promising effect of ivermectin may be augmented via its
sporontocidal effect [43]. Current modeling and field studies conducted by Bellinger et al. suggest that coadministration of ivermectin and artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) may be effective by targeting
mosquitocidal effects and malaria transmission [43]. The Repeat Ivermectin Mass Drug Administration forControl of Malaria (RIMDAMAL) study evaluated the impact of ivermectin on the cumulative incidence of
uncomplicated malaria [44]. The results showed a reduction in the incidence of uncomplicated malaria inchildren <5 years of age [44]. However, the statistical methods used for these analyses have been questioned[45,46]. More extensive trials are now in place and ongoing to retrieve more conclusive data on the role ofivermectin in malaria control [47].

Anti-inflammatory activity
The role of ivermectin as an anti-inflammatory agent has only recently been understood. This is an integral
part of its use as an antihelminthic agent. Ivermectin is now known to play an immunomodulatory role thatsuppresses inflammatory responses in humans [48]. It inhibits liposaccharide (LPS)-induced cytokine
production [49]. Toll-like receptors on macrophages recognize LPS, which leads to sequential expression and2024 Kaur et al. Cureus 16(3): e56025. DOI 10.7759/cureus.56025

4 of 10

secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), andintegrin-β6 [48]. This is made possible by the ability of ivermectin to block the nuclear factor kappa-lightchain enhancer of the activated B (NF-κB) pathway that modulates the expression and production ofproinflammatory cytokines [49]. This prevents toll-like receptor 4 from initiating a cascade that leads to the
production of proinflammatory cytokines. It is suggested that this mode of action explains why ivermectin
may be helpful in intensive care unit settings with increased risks of LPS-mediated bacterial infections[50]. Ali et al. demonstrated that increased levels of IL-17 in rosacea led to the production ofproinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNFα through the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer ofactivated B (NF-κB) pathway, which is again inhibited by ivermectin [51]. This prevents NF-kB from allowing
IL-17 to produce proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNFα. In addition, ivermectin has been shownto inhibit signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT-3), which is responsible for upregulating
proinflammatory markers in macrophages [50,52]. The ability of ivermectin to modulate the production ofproinflammatory cytokines plays a vital role in a wide range of pathological conditions.
Rosacea
Rosacea is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory skin condition. With a prevalence of almost 5.5%, it is adisorder that can cause a great disease burden, including its impact on self-esteem and the quality of life ofaffected individuals [53]. Rosacea usually involves the face and initially presents with recurrent erythema,telangiectasia, and flushing [53]. As the disease progresses, it presents with persistent erythema withpapulopustules, follicular papules, and pustules [54]. Ultraviolet radiation, spicy foods, stress, and alcohol
are well-known triggers for this disease [51]. The pathogenesis of rosacea, although not fully understood, isconsidered multifaceted. Among the significant mechanisms postulated are abnormal immune response andneurovascular dysregulation [51]. In 2019, Ali et al. discussed the likelihood of a pivotal role of IL-17 in thepathogenesis of rosacea [51]. This emerging theory is already a target of several current therapeutic agentsused to treat rosacea.
Currently, there is no cure for rosacea. Most approved agents on the market provide symptomatic relief.
Topical metronidazole, azelaic acid, and ivermectin are all approved for rosacea treatment [53]. Low-dose
doxycycline and isotretinoin also contribute to the management of rosacea [54]. A pulsed dye laser (PDL) has
been used successfully to treat the vascular components of rosacea [55]. Ivermectin plays a role in thetreatment of rosacea through its ability to suppress inflammatory markers and responses. By inhibiting thenuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway, ivermectin can prevent thecascade of IL-17 and reduce the expression and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 andTNFα [51]. Patients with rosacea have been found to have increased levels of Demodex mites on their skin[56]. The role of ivermectin as an antiparasitic agent is thought to play an additional role in the treatment ofrosacea by reducing Demodex mite infestation and providing symptomatic relief [56].
A 2018 systematic review by Ebbelaar et al. found that topical ivermectin was an effective option for thetreatment of papulopustular rosacea. It appeared to be more effective than topical metronidazole [18].
However, approximately two-thirds of the patient population relapsed within 36 weeks after discontinuing
either treatment. Another study by Osman et al. sought to determine the effectiveness of PDL alone versus
in combination with 1% topical ivermectin in the treatment of rosacea. At the three months of follow-up,
patients who received the combination treatment had a better clinical improvement than those with PDL
therapy alone [55]. However, the difference was not statistically significant. The authors concluded that the
PDL may be more effective when combined with topical ivermectin 1% [55]. These studies demonstrate thepotential of ivermectin as a combination therapy for rosacea and the need to explore the use of ivermectin
for the treatment of relapsing rosacea.

Antiviral activity
Over the past decade, much research has investigated the potential of ivermectin as an antiviral agent.
Viruses are known to have the ability to transport themselves into the nucleus and take over host activity.
This ability is often made possible by nuclear imports of viral proteins, such as importin (IMP)-α/β1 heterodimer [57]. Ivermectin is one of those agents that has been found to target the IMP-α/β1 interface byinhibiting the binding of IM-α/β1 to several viral proteins [57]. Through this mechanism, ivermectin may
have antiviral effects on viruses that rely on this interface, such as human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV1), dengue (DENV), Zika (ZIKV), West Nile virus (WNV), Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, chikungunya,
and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) [58]. Furthermore, ivermectin has been shown in some studies to be an
inhibitor of viral replication [59-62]. The below section will focus on the contentious use of ivermectin in the
management of COVID-19 and its application in the treatment of human adenoviruses.
SARS-CoV-2
In the context of the most recent pandemic, ivermectin garnered significant attention due to its potential
therapeutic implications in the management of COVID-19. Its mode of action in the treatment of COVID-19
is based on the fact that ivermectin can inhibit viral protein transportation through IMP-α/β1 [57]. In
addition, the anti-inflammatory characteristic of ivermectin may explain its potential impact on infectious
agents such as COVID-19. A cytokine storm in severe COVID-19 has been described, which involves STAT-3

2024 Kaur et al. Cureus 16(3): e56025. DOI 10.7759/cureus.56025

5 of 10upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines [50]. Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit STAT-3, so it may
help treat severe cases of COVID-19. In vitro studies of ivermectin have demonstrated that it kills SARSCoV-2 in 48 hours [30]. The inhibition of SARS-COV-2 by ivermectin in vitro was evaluated by quantitationof viral load using real-time PCR [30]. Marques et al. reported that there are currently 81 clinical trials being
carried out worldwide regarding the clinical use of ivermectin [30]. Marques et al. cite a single isolated study
in which patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 who received at least one dose of ivermectin duringhospitalization were associated with lower mortality, particularly among those with increased oxygen andventilatory requirements [30]. Jans et al. cite a study in Bangladesh that found that none of the 115 patients
who received a single dose of ivermectin developed cardiovascular or pulmonary complications, while in 133
controls, 9.8% developed pneumonia, and 1.5% had an ischemic stroke [58]. The same study revealed thatpatients treated with ivermectin transitioned to a COVID-19-negative status in a short time, with a medianof four days compared to 15 days in controls.
However, Deng et al. conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. They found that the use ofivermectin was not associated with a reduction in viral clearance time, hospitalization duration, mortality
incidence, or mechanical ventilation [63]. These authors cite the low to moderate quality of the evidence inthis search and identify the need for further trials to clarify the use of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID19. In a recent meta-analysis, Marcolino et al. evaluated 25 randomized clinical trials totaling over 6,000
patients and found that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk or mechanical ventilation requirements[64]. Furthermore, a 2023 meta-analysis on the use of ivermectin for post-exposure prophylactic measures in
COVID-19 management revealed that ivermectin did not exert a protective effect on this population [65].
This study by Hu et al. has observed a plausible protective effect of ivermectin in preexposed populations.
However, the authors have cautioned that the results of this study should be interpreted with caution due tothe poor quality of evidence in this subset of patients [65]. This suggests that further research is warranted toverify these findings and determine the potential utility of ivermectin in this context. Although isolated
randomized clinical trials may show some benefit in some studies, the most recent large-scale and metaanalyses studies suggest that the role of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19 in humans is ineffective
and inconclusive. The FDA has not authorized or approved the use of ivermectin for preventing or treating
COVID-19 in humans or animals.
Adenoviruses
Human adenoviruses are generally known to cause mild symptoms, but individuals who are
immunocompromised or vulnerable (such as the pediatric population) can develop severe disseminateddisease [59]. One of the challenges is that there is currently no known effective antiviral agent to treat
diseases caused by adenovirus. Adenoviruses are also known to rely on the importin α/β1 interface to gain
access to the nuclear envelope [59]. This is one method by which ivermectin may work with adenovirus. Kinget al. also found that ivermectin inhibits human adenovirus C5 (HAdV-C5) early gene transcription, genome
replication, early and late protein expression, and even the production of infectious viral progeny [59]. The
ivermectin inhibition of the overall production of infectious HAdV-C5 progeny was dose-dependent[59]. Ivermectin also inhibited genomic replication of human adenovirus B3 (HAdV-B3), which has been
linked to several recent outbreaks. However, it does not affect the human adenovirus E4 (HAdV-E4) [59].
King et al. have also reported findings of ivermectin affecting the binding of viral E1A proteins to IMP-α
without affecting the IMP-α/β1 interaction [59]. It is important to note that these findings have been
demonstrated in vitro. The potential of ivermectin in the management of human adenoviruses and otherviruses, for that matter, is in its infancy. The emerging antiviral mechanisms of ivermectin have only
recently been elucidated, paving the way for future in vivo studies on the efficacy of ivermectin in the
management of viral conditions.

Anticancer activity
The versatility of ivermectin continues to unfold, with much research on its role as a potential anticancer
drug. It is postulated that ivermectin can inhibit tumorigenic cell proliferation through various pathways.
Researchers first noted the anticancer effects of ivermectin in 2015 through its ability to induce autophagy
in cancer cells [66]. Although autophagy can be a survival mechanism for cancer cells through which
damaged organelles are removed and nutrients are recycled, it has recently been shown that autophagy canalso be induced by agents that suppress cancer cells [67]. Various modes of action that support the theory
that ivermectin induces apoptosis in certain cancers have recently been proposed [67-70]. The potential
roles of ivermectin in the management of different cancers have been explored. This includes breast cancer,
gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, leukemia, cervical cancer,
ovarian cancer, glioblastoma, lung cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and melanoma [26]. The anticancer
mechanism of ivermectin varies among cancers. Here, the postulated mode of action in breast cancer andglioblastoma is described. Overall, the anticancer effects of ivermectin are limited to the effects observed inhuman cell lines. Since this is a new horizon for ivermectin treatment, the literature evaluating this drug inhuman clinical trials is scarce.
Breast Cancer
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer among women worldwide [26]. One study revealed that after

2024 Kaur et al. Cureus 16(3): e56025. DOI 10.7759/cureus.56025

6 of 10ivermectin treatment, breast cancer cell proliferation is significantly reduced in vitro and in vivo [67].
Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the Akt/mTOR pathway, which induces autophagy in human breast
cancer cell lines [26, 67]. It promotes the blockage of the Akt/mTOR pathway through ubiquitinationmediated degradation of p-21-activated kinase (PAK1) [67]. Targeting PAK1 by ivermectin may open its use
in other cancers, as PAK1 is needed for growth in more than 70% of human cancers, including pancreatic,colon, prostate, and neurofibromatosis tumors in addition to breast cancer [71].
Triple-negative breast cancer, estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2) negative carry the worst prognosis of breast cancer, as these are the most aggressive forms of breast
cancer [26]. There is currently no known effective therapy to treat this subtype of cancer. Ivermectin has
been shown to mimic the SIN-3 interaction domain (SID) to block the interaction between SID and thepaired α- helix-2 [72]. Ivermectin has also been demonstrated to restore the sensitivity of triple-negative
breast cancers to tamoxifen, a commonly used anticancer drug, by regulating the expression of theepithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related gene E-cadherin [72]. Given these promising findings,
further investigations of the novel mechanisms of action of ivermectin in breast cancer are crucial. This
could pave the way for its application as a therapeutic agent in the management of breast cancer.
Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma is one of the most lethal types of cerebral tumors, with a median survival time of 14-17
months [73]. Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit human glioblastoma cell proliferation in a dosedependent manner [26]. Ivermectin can induce apoptosis in a caspase-dependent manner in these cells,
which is related to the induction of mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress [69]. Ivermectin inhibits
angiogenesis by inducing apoptosis in human brain microvascular endothelial cells [69]. This allows
ivermectin to prevent tumor angiogenesis and metastasis, which could be valuable anticancer effects.
Ivermectin has also been demonstrated to inhibit the proliferation of these cells by blocking the Akt/mTOR
pathway [69,74]. However, because ivermectin cannot cross the blood-brain barrier, its possible use islimited in the treatment of human glioblastoma.

Conclusions
Ivermectin is now recognized as a multifaceted therapeutic with diverse potential beyond its establishedantiparasitic role. Although its established efficacy in combating various parasitic infections in humans andanimals remains important, its therapeutic uses extend beyond. The anti-inflammatory andimmunomodulatory properties of ivermectin are promising for managing inflammatory skin conditions andpotentially autoimmune diseases. Its promising antiviral activity against viruses such as COVID-19 andadenoviruses, although it requires further rigorous clinical validation, presents exciting possibilities.
Moreover, emerging research unveils its potential as an anticancer agent, demonstrating antiproliferativeand proapoptotic effects in diverse cancer cell lines. Although these findings are encouraging in unravelingthe multifunctional therapeutic potential of ivermectin, extensive in vivo studies and clinical trials are
crucial to translating preclinical observations into therapeutic benefits for humans. It is important toemphasize that self-medication or the use of ivermectin outside the approved FDA indications is strongly
discouraged. It is crucial to consult a healthcare professional for appropriate diagnosis and treatment.

Additional Information
Author Contributions
All authors have reviewed the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of thework.
Concept and design: Mayur S. Parmar, Baneet Kaur, Cyril Blavo
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Mayur S. Parmar, Baneet Kaur, Cyril Blavo
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Mayur S. Parmar, Baneet Kaur,
Cyril Blavo
Supervision: Mayur S. Parmar, Cyril Blavo
Drafting of the manuscript: Baneet Kaur

Disclosures
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare thefollowing: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received fromany organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they haveno financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might
have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no2024 Kaur et al. Cureus 16(3): e56025. DOI 10.7759/cureus.56025

7 of 10other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

7.

8.
9.

10.

11.
12.

13.

14.

15.

16.
17.
18.

19.
20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.
26.
27.

Crump A, Ōmura S: Ivermectin, "wonder drug" from Japan: the human use perspective . Proc Jpn Acad Ser B
Phys Biol Sci. 2011, 87:13-28. 10.2183/pjab.87.13
Kositz C, Bradley J, Hutchins H, Last A, D'Alessandro U, Marks M: Broadening the range of use cases forivermectin - a review of the evidence. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2022, 116:201-12. 10.1093/trstmh/trab114
De Sole G, Remme J, Awadzi K, et al.: Adverse reactions after large-scale treatment of onchocerciasis with
ivermectin: combined results from eight community trials. Bull World Health Organ. 1989, 67:707-19.
White AT, Newland HS, Taylor HR, et al.: Controlled trial and dose-finding study of ivermectin fortreatment of onchocerciasis. J Infect Dis. 1987, 156:463-70. 10.1093/infdis/156.3.463
Lariviere M, Vingtain P, Aziz M, et al.: Double-blind study of ivermectin and diethylcarbamazine in African
onchocerciasis patients with ocular involvement. Lancet. 1985, 2:174-7. 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91496-5
Diallo S, Aziz MA, Lariviere M, et al.: A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of ivermectin anddiethylcarbamazine in a placebo controlled study of Senegalese patients with onchocerciasis. Trans R Soc
Trop Med Hyg. 1986, 80:927-34. 10.1016/0035-9203(86)90262-2
Awadzi K, Dadzie KY, Schulz-Key H, Gilles HM, Fulford AJ, Aziz MA: The chemotherapy of onchocerciasis.
XI. A double-blind comparative study of ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine and placebo in humanonchocerciasis in northern Ghana. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1986, 80:433-42.
10.1080/00034983.1986.11812044
Greene BM, Taylor HR, Cupp EW, et al.: Comparison of ivermectin and diethylcarbamazine in the treatmentof onchocerciasis. N Engl J Med. 1985, 313:133-8. 10.1056/NEJM198507183130301
Cully DF, Vassilatis DK, Liu KK, Paress PS, Van der Ploeg LH, Schaeffer JM, Arena JP: Cloning of an
avermectin-sensitive glutamate-gated chloride channel from Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1994,
371:707-11. 10.1038/371707a0
Janssen D, Derst C, Buckinx R, Van den Eynden J, Rigo JM, Van Kerkhove E: Dorsal unpaired medianneurons of locusta migratoria express ivermectin- and fipronil-sensitive glutamate-gated chloride channels.
J Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:2642-50. 10.1152/jn.01234.2006
Janssen D, Derst C, Rigo JM, Van Kerkhove E: Cys-loop ligand-gated chloride channels in dorsal unpaired
median neurons of Locusta migratoria. J Neurophysiol. 2010, 103:2587-98. 10.1152/jn.00466.2009
McCavera S, Rogers AT, Yates DM, Woods DJ, Wolstenholme AJ: An ivermectin-sensitive glutamate-gatedchloride channel from the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus. Mol Pharmacol. 2009, 75:1347-55.
10.1124/mol.108.053363
Moreno Y, Nabhan JF, Solomon J, Mackenzie CD, Geary TG: Ivermectin disrupts the function of theexcretory-secretory apparatus in microfilariae of Brugia malayi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107:201205. 10.1073/pnas.1011983107
Ménez C, Mselli-Lakhal L, Foucaud-Vignault M, Balaguer P, Alvinerie M, Lespine A: Ivermectin induces Pglycoprotein expression and function through mRNA stabilization in murine hepatocyte cell line. Biochem
Pharmacol. 2012, 83:269-78. 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.10.010
Schinkel AH, Smit JJ, van Tellingen O, et al.: Disruption of the mouse mdr1a P-glycoprotein gene leads to a
deficiency in the blood-brain barrier and to increased sensitivity to drugs. Cell. 1994, 77:491-502.
10.1016/0092-8674(94)90212-7
Ashour DS: Ivermectin: from theory to clinical application . Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019, 54:134-42.
10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.003
Rosumeck S, Nast A, Dressler C: Ivermectin and permethrin for treating scabies . Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2018, 4:CD012994. 10.1002/14651858.CD012994
Ebbelaar CC, Venema AW, Van Dijk MR: Topical ivermectin in the treatment of papulopustular rosacea: asystematic review of evidence and clinical guideline recommendations. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2018,
8:379-87. 10.1007/s13555-018-0249-yGonzález P, González FA, Ueno K: Ivermectin in human medicine, an overview of the current status of its
clinical applications. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012, 13:1103-9. 10.2174/138920112800399248
Hadlett M, Nagi SC, Sarkar M, Paine MJ, Weetman D: High concentrations of membrane-fed ivermectin are
required for substantial lethal and sublethal impacts on Aedes aegypti. Parasit Vectors. 2021, 14:9.
10.1186/s13071-020-04512-5
Chaccour C, Casellas A, Hammann F, et al.: BOHEMIA: Broad One Health Endectocide-based Malaria
Intervention in Africa-a phase III cluster-randomized, open-label, clinical trial to study the safety andefficacy of ivermectin mass drug administration to reduce malaria transmission in two African settings.
Trials. 2023, 24:128. 10.1186/s13063-023-07098-2
Kumar G, Pasi S, Yadav CP, Kaur J, Sharma A: Potential of ivermectin as an active ingredient of theattractive toxic sugar baits against the Indian malaria vectors Anopheles culicifacies and Anopheles
stephensi. Pest Manag Sci. 2023, 79:474-80. 10.1002/ps.7217
Yipsirimetee A, Tipthara P, Hanboonkunupakarn B, et al.: Activity of ivermectin and its metabolites against
asexual blood stage Plasmodium falciparum and its interactions with antimalarial drugs. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother. 2023, 67:e0173022. 10.1128/aac.01730-22
Kern C, Müller P, Chaccour C, Liechti ME, Hammann F, Duthaler U: Pharmacokinetics of ivermectin
metabolites and their activity against Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. Malar J. 2023, 22:194.
10.1186/s12936-023-04624-0
Xiao W, Chen M, Wang B, et al.: Efficacy and safety of antibiotic agents in the treatment of rosacea: asystemic network meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2023, 14:1169916. 10.3389/fphar.2023.1169916
Tang M, Hu X, Wang Y, et al.: Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug .
Pharmacol Res. 2021, 163:105207. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105207
Hu B, Tan H, Yu L, Liao Q, Guo W: Repurposing Ivermectin to augment chemotherapy's efficacy inosteosarcoma. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2022, 41:9603271221143693. 10.1177/09603271221143693

2024 Kaur et al. Cureus 16(3): e56025. DOI 10.7759/cureus.56025

8 of 10

28.
29.

30.
31.
32.

33.

34.

35.
36.
37.

38.
39.

40.
41.
42.
43.
44.

45.
46.
47.

48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.

56.
57.
58.
59.
60.

Jawad MJ, Richardson A: Ivermectin augments the anti-cancer activity of pitavastatin in ovarian cancer
cells. Diseases. 2023, 11:10.3390/diseases11010049
Samy A, Hussein MA, Munirathinam G: Eprinomectin: a derivative of ivermectin suppresses growth andmetastatic phenotypes of prostate cancer cells by targeting the β-catenin signaling pathway. J Cancer Res
Clin Oncol. 2023, 149:9085-104. 10.1007/s00432-023-04829-5
Marques LL, Beneti SC, Pinzon C, Cardoso FA: Ivermectin as a possible treatment for COVID-19: a review ofthe 2022 protocols. Braz J Biol. 2022, 84:e258325. 10.1590/1519-6984.258325
Sunderkötter C, Wohlrab J, Hamm H: Scabies: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int.
2021, 118:695-704. 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0296
Aždajić MD, Bešlić I, Gašić A, Ferara N, Pedić L, Lugović-Mihić L: Increased scabies incidence at the
beginning of the 21st century: what do reports from Europe and the world show?. Life (Basel). 2022,
12:10.3390/life12101598
Zhang W, Zhang Y, Luo L, et al.: Trends in prevalence and incidence of scabies from 1990 to 2017: findings
from the global Burden of disease study 2017. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020, 9:813-6.
10.1080/22221751.2020.1754136
Yotsu RR, Yoshizumi J, Izri A: Biology of Sarcoptes scabiei and Its Relevance to Human Scabies: ClinicalSymptoms, Treatment, and Management.. Scabies. Fischer K, Chosidow O (ed): Springer, Cham; 2023. 1934. 10.1007/978-3-031-26070-4_2
Meltan S, Panuganti B, Tarbox M: Evaluation and management of pruritus and scabies in the elderly
population. Clin Geriatr Med. 2024, 40:91-116. 10.1016/j.cger.2023.09.010
Meyersburg D, Kaiser A, Bauer JW: Loss of efficacy of topical 5% permethrin for treating scabies: an Austrian
single-center study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022, 33:774-7. 10.1080/09546634.2020.1774489
Meyersburg D, Welponer T, Kaiser A, Selhofer S, Tatarski R, Handisurya A, Bauer JW: Comparison of topicalbenzyl benzoate vs. oral ivermectin in treating scabies: a randomized study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.
2023, 37:160-5. 10.1111/jdv.18573
Victoria J, Trujillo R: Topical ivermectin: a new successful treatment for scabies . Pediatr Dermatol. 2001,
18:63-5. 10.1046/j.1525-1470.2001.018001063.x
Dhana A, Yen H, Okhovat JP, Cho E, Keum N, Khumalo NP: Ivermectin versus permethrin in the treatment
of scabies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Acad Dermatol.
2018, 78:194-8. 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.006
Mohebbipour A, Saleh P, Goldust M, Amirnia M, Zadeh YJ, Mohamadi RM, Rezaee E: Treatment of scabies:
comparison of ivermectin vs. lindane lotion 1%. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2012, 20:251-5.
Singh K, Tripathi RP: Carbohydrate derivatives fight against malaria parasite as anti-plasmodial agents .
Carbohydr Res. 2023, 531:108887. 10.1016/j.carres.2023.108887
Meyers JI, Gray M, Kuklinski W, et al.: Characterization of the target of ivermectin, the glutamate-gatedchloride channel, from Anopheles gambiae. J Exp Biol. 2015, 218:1478-86. 10.1242/jeb.118570
Bellinger AM, Jafari M, Grant TM, et al.: Oral, ultra-long-lasting drug delivery: application toward malaria
elimination goals. Sci Transl Med. 2016, 8:365ra157. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2374
Foy BD, Alout H, Seaman JA, et al.: Efficacy and risk of harms of repeat ivermectin mass drug
administrations for control of malaria (RIMDAMAL): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2019, 393:1517-26.
10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32321-3
Bradley J, Moulton LH, Hayes R: Analysis of the RIMDAMAL trial. Lancet. 2019, 394:1005-6. 10.1016/S01406736(19)31663-0
Foy BD, Rao S, Parikh S, Slater HC, Dabiré RK: Analysis of the RIMDAMAL trial - Authors' reply . Lancet.
2019, 394:1006-7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32139-7
Foy BD, Some A, Magalhaes T, et al.: Repeat ivermectin mass drug administrations for malaria control II:
protocol for a double-blind, cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled trial for the integrated control ofmalaria. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023, 12:e41197. 10.2196/41197
Kircik LH, Del Rosso JQ, Layton AM, Schauber J: Over 25 years of clinical experience with ivermectin: an
overview of safety for an increasing number of indications. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016, 15:325-32.
Zhang X, Song Y, Ci X, et al.: Ivermectin inhibits LPS-induced production of inflammatory cytokines andimproves LPS-induced survival in mice. Inflamm Res. 2008, 57:524-9. 10.1007/s00011-008-8007-8
Zaidi AK, Dehgani-Mobaraki P: The mechanisms of action of ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2-an extensive
review. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2022, 75:60-71. 10.1038/s41429-021-00491-6
Amir Ali A, Vender R, Vender R: The role of IL-17 in papulopustular rosacea and future directions . J Cutan
Med Surg. 2019, 23:635-41. 10.1177/1203475419867611
Matsuyama T, Kubli SP, Yoshinaga SK, Pfeffer K, Mak TW: An aberrant STAT pathway is central to COVID19. Cell Death Differ. 2020, 27:3209-25. 10.1038/s41418-020-00633-7
Almeida LM, Ianhez M, Dal'Forno T, et al.: Long-term maintenance treatment of rosacea: experts' opinion.
Int J Dermatol. 2024, 63:94-101. 10.1111/ijd.16920
Clanner-Engelshofen BM, Bernhard D, Dargatz S, et al.: S2k guideline: Rosacea. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2022,
20:1147-65. 10.1111/ddg.14849
Osman M, Shokeir HA, Hassan AM, Khalifa MA: Pulsed dye laser alone versus its combination with topicalivermectin 1% in treatment of Rosacea: a randomized comparative study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022, 33:18490. 10.1080/09546634.2020.1737636
Sahni DR, Feldman SR, Taylor SL: Ivermectin 1% (CD5024) for the treatment of rosacea . Expert Opin
Pharmacother. 2018, 19:511-6. 10.1080/14656566.2018.1447562
Martin AJ, Jans DA: Antivirals that target the host IMPα/β1-virus interface . Biochem Soc Trans. 2021,
49:281-95. 10.1042/BST20200568
Jans DA, Wagstaff KM: The broad spectrum host-directed agent ivermectin as an antiviral for SARS-CoV-2?. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021, 538:163-72. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.042
King CR, Tessier TM, Dodge MJ, Weinberg JB, Mymryk JS: Inhibition of human adenovirus replication by theimportin α/β1 nuclear import inhibitor ivermectin. J Virol. 2020, 94: 10.1128/JVI.00710-20
Pérez S, Miró MV, Verna A, Altamiranda EG, Barcos O, Lanusse C, Lifschitz A: Ivermectin antiviral activity

2024 Kaur et al. Cureus 16(3): e56025. DOI 10.7759/cureus.56025

9 of 10

61.
62.
63.

64.

65.
66.
67.
68.

69.

70.

71.
72.

73.
74.

against Varicellovirus bovinealpha 1: assessment of intracellular drug accumulation in virus-infected cells.
Arch Microbiol. 2024, 206:78. 10.1007/s00203-023-03806-3
Patho B, Grant DM, Percival A, Russell GC: Ivermectin inhibits replication of the malignant catarrhal fever
virus alcelaphine herpesvirus 1. Virology. 2024, 590:109958. 10.1016/j.virol.2023.109958
Raza S, Shahin F, Zhai W, et al.: Ivermectin inhibits bovine herpesvirus 1 DNA polymerase nuclear importand interferes with viral replication. Microorganisms. 2020, 8: 10.3390/microorganisms8030409
Deng J, Zhou F, Ali S, Heybati K, Hou W, Huang E, Wong CY: Efficacy and safety of ivermectin for thetreatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. QJM. 2021, 114:721-32.
10.1093/qjmed/hcab247
Marcolino MS, Meira KC, Guimarães NS, et al.: Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin fortreatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype. BMC Infect Dis. 2022, 22:639. 10.1186/s12879-02207589-8
Hu GY, Liang CA, Lin PC, Lin CY: Ivermectin’s role in the prevention of COVID-19: a systematic review andmeta-analysis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2023, 63:288-97. 10.1002/jcph.2178
Huang H, He Q, Guo B, Xu X, Wu Y, Li X: Progress in redirecting antiparasitic drugs for cancer treatment .
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021, 15:2747-67. 10.2147/DDDT.S308973
Dou Q, Chen HN, Wang K, et al.: Ivermectin induces cytostatic autophagy by blocking the PAK1/AKT axis inbreast cancer. Cancer Res. 2016, 76:4457-69. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2887
Li MY, Zhang J, Lu X, et al.: Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 andapoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2024, 93:41-54. 10.1007/s00280023-04589-6
Liu Y, Fang S, Sun Q, Liu B: Anthelmintic drug ivermectin inhibits angiogenesis, growth and survival of
glioblastoma through inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun. 2016, 480:415-21. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.064
Feng Y, Wang J, Cai B, Bai X, Zhu Y: Ivermectin accelerates autophagic death of glioma cells by inhibiting
glycolysis through blocking GLUT4 mediated JAK/STAT signaling pathway activation. Environ Toxicol. 2022,
37:754-64. 10.1002/tox.23440
Hashimoto H, Messerli SM, Sudo T, Maruta H: Ivermectin inactivates the kinase PAK1 and blocks the PAK1dependent growth of human ovarian cancer and NF2 tumor cell lines. Drug Discov Ther. 2009, 3:243-6.
Kwon YJ, Petrie K, Leibovitch BA, et al.: Selective inhibition of SIN3 corepressor with avermectins as a novel
therapeutic strategy in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015, 14:1824-36. 10.1158/15357163.MCT-14-0980-T
Molinaro AM, Taylor JW, Wiencke JK, Wrensch MR: Genetic and molecular epidemiology of adult diffuse
glioma. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019, 15:405-17. 10.1038/s41582-019-0220-2
Liu J, Liang H, Chen C, et al.: Ivermectin induces autophagy-mediated cell death through the AKT/mTOR
signaling pathway in glioma cells. Biosci Rep. 2019, 39: 10.1042/BSR20192489

2024 Kaur et al. Cureus 16(3): e56025. DOI 10.7759/cureus.56025

10 of 10