Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer: Not Relevant for Purposesof Joint Planning
GMA 13 Technical Memorandum 16-06, Draft 2
William R. Hutchison, Ph.D., P.E., P.G.
April 4, 2016
Introduction
The Texas Water Development Board, in its July 2013 document, Explanatory Report for
Submittal of Desired Future Conditions to the Texas Water Development Board, offers thefollowing guidance regarding documentation for aquifers that are to be classified not relevant for
purposes of joint planning:Districts in a groundwater management area may, as part of the process foradopting and submitting desired future conditions, propose classification of aportion or portions of a relevant aquifer as non-relevant (31 Texas Administrative
Code 356.31 (b)). This proposed classification of an aquifer may be made if thedistricts determine that aquifer characteristics, groundwater demands, and current
groundwater uses do not warrant adoption of a desired future condition.
The districts must submit to the TWDB the following documentation for the portionof the aquifer proposed to be classified as non-relevant:
1. A description, location, and/or map of the aquifer or portion of theaquifer;
2. A summary of aquifer characteristics, groundwater demands, andcurrent groundwater uses, including the total estimated recoverable
storage as provided by the TWDB, that support the conclusion thatdesired future conditions in adjacent or hydraulically connected
relevant aquifer(s) will not be affected; and3. An explanation of why the aquifer or portion of the aquifer is nonrelevant for joint planning purposes.
This technical memorandum provides the required documentation to classify the Edwards(Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer as not relevant for purposes of joint planning.
Aquifer Description and Location
As described in George and others (2011):
The Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer is a major aquifer in the southcentral part of the state. It consists primarily of partially dissolved limestone thatcreates a highly permeable aquifer. Aquifer thickness ranges from 200 to 600 feet,and freshwater saturated thickness averages 560 feet in the southern part of theaquifer. The groundwater, although hard, is generally fresh and contains less than
500 milligrams per liter of total dissolved solids. Water from the aquifer is1

Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer: Not Relevant for Purposesof Joint Planning
GMA 13 Technical Memorandum 16-06, Draft 2
William R. Hutchison, Ph.D., P.E., P.G.
April 4, 2016
primarily used for municipal, irrigation, and recreational purposes. San Antonio
obtains almost all of its water supply from the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone)
Aquifer. The aquifer feeds several well-known springs, including Comal Springs inComal County, which is the largest spring in the state, and San Marcos Springs inHays County, which is the second largest. Hueco, San Pedro, San Antonio, andLeona springs also discharge from the aquifer. Because of the aquifer’s highly
permeable nature, water levels and spring flows respond quickly to rainfall,drought, and pumping. Although water levels periodically and seasonally decline
rapidly in wells throughout the aquifer, they also rebound quickly with adequate
rainfall. The regional water planning groups, in their 2006 Regional Water Plans,
recommended several water management strategies that use the Edwards(Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer, including drilling new wells, constructing small
dams along streambeds to enhance recharge to the aquifer, and reallocating
supplies from irrigation to municipal users. They also recommended expanding an
existing aquifer storage and recovery facility that stores water from the Edwards(Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer in the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer in southern Bexar
County.
Figure 1 (taken from Wade and Bradley, 2013) shows the limited extent of the Edwards (BalconesFault Zone) Aquifer in GMA 13. Note that it occurs only in a small portion of Atascosa, Bexar,Frio, Medina, Uvalde, and Zavala counties.

2

Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer: Not Relevant for Purposesof Joint Planning
GMA 13 Technical Memorandum 16-06, Draft 2
William R. Hutchison, Ph.D., P.E., P.G.
April 4, 2016

Figure 1. Location of Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer in GMA 13
Aquifer Characteristics
Lindgren and others, (2004, p 26) provided a map of the distribution of hydraulic conductivity thatincluded the limited area of the aquifer within GMA 13. Within GMA 13, the hydraulicconductivity appears to range from about 50 ft/day to about 500 ft/day.

3

Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer: Not Relevant for Purposesof Joint Planning
GMA 13 Technical Memorandum 16-06, Draft 2
William R. Hutchison, Ph.D., P.E., P.G.
April 4, 2016
Groundwater Demands and Current Groundwater Uses
The Texas Water Development Board pumping database shows 2012 groundwater pumping for
the Trinity Aquifer as follows:






Atascosa: 413 AF/yr
Bexar: 268,490 AF/yr
Frio: 0 AF/yr
Medina: 41,554 AF/yr
Uvalde: 74,218 AF/yr
Zavala: 0 AF/yr

Please note that these are totals for the entire county, not necessarily in the GMA 13 portion of theTrinity Aquifer.
Total Estimated Recoverable Storage
Wade and others (2013) documented the total estimated recoverable storage for the Trinity Aquifer
in GMA 13 as follows:

Total storage is given in the first column. The recoverable storage is assumed to be between 25
and 75 percent of the total storage.
Explanation of Non-RelevanceDue to its limited areal extent and generally low use, the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer
is classified as not relevant for purposes of joint planning in Groundwater Management Area 13.
4

Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer: Not Relevant for Purposesof Joint Planning
GMA 13 Technical Memorandum 16-06, Draft 2
William R. Hutchison, Ph.D., P.E., P.G.
April 4, 2016
References
George, P.G., Mace, R.E., and Petrossian, R., 2011. Aquifers of Texas. Texas Water Development
Board Report 380, July 2011, 182p.
Lindgren, R.J., Dutton, A.R., Hovorka, S.D., Worthington, S.R.H., and Painter, S., 2004.
Conceptualization and Simulation of the Edwards Aquifer, San Antonio Region, Texas. USGS
Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5277., 153p.
Wade, S., and Bradley, R., 2013. GAM Task 13-036: Total Estimated Recoverable Storage forAquifers in Groundwater Management Area 13. Texas Water Development Board, Groundwater
Resources Division, July 8, 2013, 30p.

5