EFFECTS OF SLEEP EXTENSION ON ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE
DOI: 10.5665/SLEEP.1132

The Effects of Sleep Extension on the Athletic Performance of Collegiate
Basketball Players
Cheri D. Mah, MS1; Kenneth E. Mah, MD, MS1; Eric J. Kezirian, MD, MPH2; William C. Dement, MD, PhD1

Stanford Sleep Disorders Clinic and Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA; 2Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
1Study Objectives: To investigate the effects of sleep extension over multiple weeks on specific measures of athletic performance as well as reaction time, mood, and daytime sleepiness.
Setting: Stanford Sleep Disorders Clinic and Research Laboratory and Maples Pavilion, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Participants: Eleven healthy students on the Stanford University men’s varsity basketball team (mean age 19.4 ± 1.4 years).
Interventions: Subjects maintained their habitual sleep-wake schedule for a 2-4 week baseline followed by a 5-7 week sleep extension period.
Subjects obtained as much nocturnal sleep as possible during sleep extension with a minimum goal of 10 h in bed each night. Measures of athletic
performance specific to basketball were recorded after every practice including a timed sprint and shooting accuracy. Reaction time, levels of
daytime sleepiness, and mood were monitored via the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Profile of Mood
States (POMS), respectively.
Results: Total objective nightly sleep time increased during sleep extension compared to baseline by 110.9 ± 79.7 min (P < 0.001). Subjects
demonstrated a faster timed sprint following sleep extension (16.2 ± 0.61 sec at baseline vs. 15.5 ± 0.54 sec at end of sleep extension, P < 0.001).
Shooting accuracy improved, with free throw percentage increasing by 9% and 3-point field goal percentage increasing by 9.2% (P < 0.001). Mean
PVT reaction time and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores decreased following sleep extension (P < 0.01). POMS scores improved with increased
vigor and decreased fatigue subscales (P < 0.001). Subjects also reported improved overall ratings of physical and mental well-being during practices and games.
Conclusions: Improvements in specific measures of basketball performance after sleep extension indicate that optimal sleep is likely beneficial inreaching peak athletic performance.
Keywords: Sleep extension, extra sleep, athletes, athletic performance, sports, basketball, collegiate, reaction time, mood, fatigue
Citation: Mah CD; Mah KE; Kezirian EJ; Dement WC. The effects of sleep extension on the athletic performance of collegiate basketball players.
SLEEP 2011;34(7):943-950.

INTRODUCTION
Sleep deprivation has traditionally been the major approach toilluminating the role of sleep in human functioning. This researchhas documented the detrimental consequences of sleep restriction
and the sleep debt that subsequently accumulates on cognitive
function, mood, daytime sleepiness, and traditional performanceindices such as reaction time and learning and memory tasks.1-3
Several studies have also demonstrated the negative impact of
sleep restriction on physical performance including weight-lifting, cardiorespiratory functioning, and psychomotor tasks that
require accuracy and consistent performance.4-6 In general, ourunderstanding of sleep via a sleep deprivation model has been
fairly well documented and characterized.
Very few investigations have studied the converse: the impact of extended sleep over multiple nights to weeks; of the few
that have, the study designs and results are inconsistent. Manyof the limited number of previous sleep extension studies support the idea that obtaining additional sleep is beneficial to human functioning. For example, sleep extended to 10 h/night for
4 days resulted in decreased daytime sleepiness as assessed by

the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT).7 In undergraduate students, extending sleep resulted in faster reaction time, improved
mood, and improvements in MSLT scores.8 The results fromthese 2 studies are supported by young adults who experienced
improvements in both MSLT and mood testing after extended
sleep independent of preexisting sleep debt.9 Additionally, obtaining sleep through napping after sleep loss has been shown
to improve reaction time, sprinting times, and performance on
vigilance tasks.10-12 However, on the other hand, other previous
studies have shown that 2 nights of extended sleep resulted indecrements in vigilance performance tasks13 and 4 days of sleep
extended to 10 h in bed did not result in significant changes incognitive performance tests.14 These variable results underscorethat the effects of sleep extension have yet to be thoroughly
investigated.
While sleep extension studies have begun to examine therelationship between obtaining extra sleep and cognitive functioning, minimal research has investigated the effects of sleep
extension over relatively longer periods of time and on physicalperformance. Furthermore, little if any research has addressed
how sleep extension specifically affects athletic performance,
rather than just traditional indices of physical performancemeasured in the laboratory. To our knowledge, there are no
studies to date that document sleep extension and the athletic
performance of actively competing athletes.
The aim of the current study was to extend the nocturnal
sleep duration of collegiate basketball players for a number ofweeks and to examine the effects on specific indices of ath-

Submitted for publication May, 2010
Submitted in final revised form March, 2011
Accepted for publication March, 2011
Address correspondence to: Cheri D. Mah, 1050A Arastradero Road,
Palo Alto, CA 94304; Tel: (650) 353-7536; Fax: (650) 725-7341; E-mail:cherimah@stanfordalumni.org
SLEEP, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2011943

Effects of Sleep Extension on Athletic Performance—Mah et alletic performance as well as the traditional measures of reaction
time, daytime sleepiness, and mood. With a better understanding of the relationship between total sleep time and athletic
performance, athletes may be able to optimize training andcompetition outcomes by identifying strategies to maximize
the benefits of sleep.

protocol. These slight variations in subjects’ schedules resulted
in the differences in baseline and sleep extension periods.
A regular sleep-wake schedule was strongly encouraged aswell as daytime naps. Sleep duration, athletic performance,
reaction time, daytime sleepiness, and mood measures wererecorded throughout the baseline period and sleep extension.
Subjects were required to sleep alone in their regular bedroom,
except when traveling, during which subjects shared a hotel
room with another teammate but slept in separate beds. Subjects were also required to refrain from alcohol and caffeine
consumption throughout the study. The study was terminatedwhen subjects could no longer obtain additional sleep eachnight or the academic quarter which they were enrolled in the
study ended, preventing them from continued participation.

METHODS
Subject Selection ProcessThis study was conducted over 2 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) seasons (2005-2008) at Stanford
University, where there are 35 varsity sports, 19 for women,
15 for men, and 1 coed, with approximately 800 total student
athletes. During any given quarter of the academic calendar,
approximately 11 sports are in-season although various sports’schedules span multiple quarters. Subjects were selected from apool of undergraduate athletes that were currently participating
in a varsity sport at Stanford University. The full roster of men’s
and women’s sports whose main competitive season occurs during the collegiate winter quarter from January to March, when
this study was initiated, received a general solicitation email.
A sport was examined if ≥ 5 athletes responded in the 2005
season. Inadequate numbers, such as only 1-2 athletes per sport,
would not be sufficient to draw generalized conclusions frombecause each sport investigates specific athletic performancemeasures not comparable across sports.
Next, a detailed screening questionnaire was administered
to athletes who responded to the solicitation email inquiring
about their current and past medical health as well as sleeping
habits. Subjects were included if they were healthy, did not report current difficulties with their sleep, and were “in season”
for their sport, regularly practicing, and competing in games
or competitions. Subjects were excluded if they had existing
injuries that prevented them from regular practice or games.
Subjects were also excluded if they had a history of a sleep
or psychiatric disorder, took medications with sleep relatedside effects, or had illicit drug use or other health concerns.
Finally, athletes were excluded if they no longer had interestin participating, or were unwilling to or did not feel that they
could comply with the study’s protocol after the details wereexplained to them. The Stanford Panel on Human Subject Research approved the study and written informed consent was
obtained from all subjects.

Traveling
Subjects frequently traveled to compete at other universities
throughout the study which occurred during the regular NCAAbasketball season. Travel duration typically was 3-5 days, occurring once to twice a month. Subjects traveled by bus andplane often within Pacific Standard Time zone, and occasionally crossed into Mountain and Central Standard Time zones.
Most trips included travel to play games at 2 universities indifferent cities within the same state. The team’s travel schedule included fluctuating times for flights, bus rides, practices,games, and team meetings. Consequently, subjects had lesscontrol over their sleep-wake times when traveling and thus frequently had atypical sleep-wake schedules for these 3-5 day periods. When subjects were not able to obtain 10 h of nocturnal
sleep due to travel, they were encouraged to nap during the day.
Sleep-Wake Activity, Daytime Sleepiness, and Mood Measurements
To monitor daily sleep-wake activity, actigraphy was utilized
in addition to subject reported daily sleep logs and journals.
Actigraphy is an accepted method used to quantify sleep-wakeactivity based on subject movement.15 Actigraphy devices were
worn on the wrist corresponding to the subject’s dominant hand
24 h/day except during practices and games (AW-64, Philips
Respironics, Andover, MA). The raw actigraphy data (1-min
epoch length) was reviewed to remove periods of device malfunction. The nocturnal sleep and napping periods were manually determined from subject recorded sleep journals. Nocturnal
sleep was defined as the period between subject reported bedtime and awakening time. Manually setting the nocturnal sleep
periods to account for time zone changes during travel was also
performed. Actigraphy sleep data was scored by a validated
proprietary algorithm within the commercial software (Actiware software, Philips Respironics, Andover, MA). Subjects
reported sleep-wake activity in sleep journals including timein bed, awakening time, minutes awake during the night, andhours napping during the day.
To assess the level of daytime sleepiness and monitor changes in mood states, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)16 wasadministered during the baseline and at the end of sleep extension, while the Profile of Mood States (POMS)17 was recorded
weekly. The ESS measures sleep propensity on a 0-3 scale in
8 standardized daily situations. Possible scores range from 0 to
24, with higher scores reflecting greater sleepiness. The POMS
questionnaire is a psychological assessment commonly used toStudy Design
Subjects maintained their habitual sleep-wake patterns for a
2-4 week baseline period during the NCAA basketball season
and stayed within the limits of 6-9 h of subjective sleep timeeach night. Subjects then extended their nocturnal sleep durationfor 5-7 weeks during which they obtained as much extra sleep as
possible with a minimum goal of 10 h in bed per night. The baseline and sleep extension periods occasionally varied in length
across subjects because of the academic schedule. Some subjects were allowed to enroll slightly later due to changes in theiracademic courses and schedule at the beginning of the quarter,
which coincided with the study’s initiation. During sleep extension, subjects were assigned final exams on different days which
prevented some subjects from continuing the sleep extension
SLEEP, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2011944

Effects of Sleep Extension on Athletic Performance—Mah et almonitor and compare distinct mood states. Subjects report on
65 identifiable mood states over the previous 7 days, which are
categorized into 6 mood subscales: tension, depression, anger,
vigor, fatigue, and confusion. The POMS questionnaire washand-scored.

mood. Sleep times during sleep extension were compared tothe mean sleep time for each subject to determine the change
in sleep time.
Fixed-effects linear regression models examined the association between the day of the study and outcome measures including total sleep time, athletic performance measures, mean
PVT reaction time, ESS, and POMS global and subscale scores.
These models were necessary to compare outcome measuresduring baseline and sleep extension due to the repeated measures testing of individual subjects. All baseline data (considered as day 0) for outcome measures were incorporated into theregression analysis. Descriptive statistics for baseline and sleep
extension periods are reported for all outcomes, with P-values
determined using the regression models. P-values < 0.05 wereconsidered statistically significant. There was no adjustment for
multiple comparisons.

Athletic Performance Measures and Testing
Indices of athletic performance specific to basketball were
measured after every practice to assess changes in performance.
Practices were typically in the afternoon and athletic measures
were correspondingly recorded typically between 12:00-15:00.
The indices measured, including a timed sprint and shooting
accuracy, were chosen because of their routine use during mostpractices and strong reflection of individual performance inbasketball games. The first athletic performance measure wasa timed 282 feet sprint (baseline to half-court and back to baseline, then to full-court and back to baseline) and was timed after
each practice by the same person. The second and third performance indices were free throw and 3-point shooting accuracy.
Specifically, shooting accuracy was assessed by a subject’s successful attempts of 10 free throws (15 feet) and 15 three-point
field goals (5 in the right corner of the court, then 5 directly
facing the basket, and finally 5 in the left corner of the court). It
is important to note that the official men’s NCAA 3-point fieldgoal line was extended from 19 feet 9 inches (6 subjects) to 20
feet 9 inches (5 subjects) from the basket starting in the 20082009 NCAA season. In addition, subjects’ subjective mental
and physical well-being were assessed after every practice andgame by soliciting how they felt during the practice or game on
a 10-point rating scale.

RESULTS
Study Population
Men’s basketball was the only sport that satisfied the subject
selection criterion of ≥ 5 athletes responding to the solicitation
email during the 2005 season, and therefore was the sport examined in the present study. In total, 13 men’s basketball players
responded with interest, and ultimately 11 healthy undergraduate students (aged 18-22 y) on the Stanford men’s varsity basketball team (mean age 19.4 ± 1.4 y) were enrolled in the study.
Two were excluded because they were unwilling to or did not
feel that they could comply with the protocol. Table 1 lists subjects’ demographics and demonstrates no statistically significant difference between basketball players who enrolled in thePsychomotor Vigilance Task
Subjects performed the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT,
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD)
on a personal digital assistant (PDA) (Palm Pilot, Palm USA,
Sunnyvale, CA) twice daily throughout the study. The PVT isa standard measure of reaction time and is commonly used tomonitor changes in performance.18,19 Each 10-min trial consisted of stimuli occurring at intervals ranging from 2 to 12 sec.
Subjects responded to the stimuli by pressing a button on the
PDA using their dominant thumb. Due to differences in eachsubject’s daily schedule (including academic classes, practices,and team meetings), subjects aimed to complete the 2 PVT trials during the same 1-h periods each day (e.g., 10:00-11:00 and
18:00-19:00 daily) to minimize the effects of circadian rhythms.
On days that subjects were traveling, PVT trials continued to be
conducted during the same 1-h time intervals based on the timezone in which subjects were located. Subjects also completed
an additional PVT trial during their weekly meeting with study
investigators. The PVT primary outcome of interest was mean
reaction time; secondary outcomes were minimum, maximum,and median reaction times, and number of lapses > 500 millisec.

Table 1—Subject and non-participant demographics

Race
Caucasian n (%)
African American n (%)
Sex
Male n (%)
Height (m)Range
Weight (kg)Range
BMI (kg/m2)
Range
Year in school
Range
Position on team
Guard n (%)
Forward n (%)
Center n (%)

Data Analysis
Subjective and objective sleep times were examined during
the baseline and sleep extension periods. Total sleep time included nocturnal sleep as well as daytime naps. The initial 2-4
week period established baseline measures of sleep-wake activity, athletic performance, reaction time, daytime sleepiness, andSLEEP, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2011

Subjects

Non-participants(N = 11)(N = 15)2.0 (18.2)
9.0 (81.8)

N/A
N/A

11.0 (100)1.93 ± 0.1
1.82 - 2.08
88.3 ± 7.7
79.4 - 108.0
23.7 ± 1.2
21.4 - 25.3
1.9 ± 1.0
1-4

15.0 (100)2.00 ± 0.1
1.83 - 2.13
95.6 ± 8.9
83.9 - 111.1
23.8 ± 1.1
21.4 - 25.4
2.2 ± 1.4
1-4

8.0 (72.7)
2.0 (18.2)
1.0 (9.1)

6.0 (40.0)
6.0 (40.0)
3.0 (20.0)

P

0.06
0.04
0.80
0.57

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise indicated;
BMI (body mass index). Year in School – Freshman = 1; Sophomore = 2;
Junior = 3; Senior = 4.
945

Effects of Sleep Extension on Athletic Performance—Mah et alstudy and those who did not participate, with the exception ofweight. Body mass index, which accounts for both height andweight, was not significantly different between the 2 groups.

PVT periods significantly decreased (P < 0.05). Nearly all other
PVT performance measures showed a significant improvement following sleep extension, notably a decreased numberof lapses and daily minimum reaction time. Figure 1 presents
the change in evening PVT mean reaction time during the sleep
extension period compared to baseline.

Total Sleep Time
Total daily sleep time increased from baseline to sleep extension according to both objective actigraphy and subjective
sleep journals (Table 2). Objective sleep time increased during
the sleep extension period compared to baseline by 110.9 ± 79.7
min (P < 0.001). Subjective reports of total sleep time were significantly higher than actigraphy sleep time during both baseline and sleep extension.

Athletic Performance
Improvement was observed in all indices assessing basketball athletic performance (Table 4). Sprint time significantly
decreased from baseline to the end of sleep extension (16.2 sec
vs. 15.5 sec, P < 0.001), as illustrated in Figure 2. Subjects experienced a significant improvement in shooting accuracy, withan increase in both successful free throws out of 10 shots (7.9
vs. 8.8, P < 0.001) and successful 3-point field goals out of 15
shots (10.2 vs. 11.6, P < 0.001). Individual athletic performancemeasures are reported on a case-by-case basis for all subjects
in Table 5. Subjects reported improved practice and game ratings after sleep extension (P < 0.001). The subjective ratings
at baseline revealed a difference in mental and physical wellbeing between practices and games (6.9 and 7.8), however following sleep extension, subjects reported similar ratings during
both practices and games (8.8).

Psychomotor Vigilance Task
During sleep extension compared to baseline, subjects demonstrated improved PVT performance during daily and weekly
testing (Table 3). Mean reaction time for all daily and weekly
Table 2—Total sleep time per night during baseline and sleep extension
Sleep
Extension

Baseline

P

Subject sleep journals (min) 470.0 ± 65.9
Mean days of data
18.2 ± 5.6

624.2 ± 68.4 < 0.001
41.5 ± 3.3

Actigraphy (min)Mean days of data

507.6 ± 78.6 < 0.001
41.2 ± 3.3

400.7 ± 61.8
17.7 ± 4.8

Daytime Sleepiness and Mood
Both daytime sleepiness and mood improved as measured by
ESS scores and POMS from baseline to the end of sleep extension (Table 6). These changes in the ESS scores indicate a substantial reduction in levels of daytime sleepiness. Although all
POMS subscale scores demonstrated improvement,
the marked changes in POMS vigor, fatigue, andtotal mood disturbance are particularly impressive.

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Table 3—Psychomotor Vigilance Task performance
Baseline

End Sleep Extension

P

Weekly PVT
Mean reaction time (ms)Minimum reaction time (ms)Maximum reaction time (ms)Median reaction time (ms)No. of times RT > 500 ms lapses
Mean days of data

310.84 ± 77.13
204.84 ± 52.86
963.13 ± 719.95
287.60 ± 65.91
4.83 ± 4.34
2.64 ± 0.67

274.51 ± 42.01
198.10 ± 24.00
612.38 ± 381.02
261.43 ± 35.82
1.29 ± 2.97
1.91 ± 0.30

0.004
0.339
0.011
0.012
< 0.001

Daily Morning PVT (09:00-13:00)
Mean reaction time (ms)Minimum reaction time (ms)Maximum reaction time (ms)Median reaction time (ms)No. of times RT > 500 ms lapses
Mean days of data

329.64 ± 45.44
215.61 ± 34.34
1030.7 ± 516.03
300.36 ± 38.11
6.70 ± 5.89
10.89 ± 5.16

285.86 ± 34.26
208.49 ± 30.72
664.15 ± 390.09
268.77 ± 30.51
1.53 ± 1.90
6.63 ± 5.06

< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001

Daily Evening PVT (18:00-24:00)
Mean reaction time (ms)Minimum reaction time (ms)Maximum reaction time (ms)Median reaction time (ms)No. of times RT > 500 ms lapses
Mean days of data

336.03 ± 50.10
215.35 ± 36.04
985.66 ± 439.63
307.93 ± 43.49
7.07 ± 6.45
11.0 ± 5.52

285.91 ± 34.17
204.57 ± 27.84
602.22 ± 260.61
272.22 ± 27.23
1.68 ± 2.34
10.13 ± 6.52

< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation. Daily afternoon (13:00-18:00) PVT data
similar to morning and evening data but not shown.
SLEEP, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2011946

DISCUSSION
In this study, subjects from the Stanford men’svarsity basketball team experienced significant
improvements in specific indices of athletic performance, reaction time, daytime sleepiness, andmood after sleep extension over 5-7 weeks. While
many variables such as nutrition, conditioning,and coaching certainly contribute to athletic performance outcomes, sleep duration has not been
directly studied as an important factor. To ourknowledge, this is the first such study. Further understanding of the effects of sleep on athletic performance could benefit athletes at all levels.
Indirect evidence has shown previously that sleep
may affect athletic performance, based on observational or retrospective examinations of circadianrhythms and circadian disruptions. These studies
have demonstrated effects of circadian rhythms
and suggest a negative effect of traveling between
multiple time zones on athletic performance.20 According to Kline et al., circadian rhythms affect collegiate swimmers, who demonstrated differences inmaximal swim effort during trials at various timesof the day.21 Other investigations on aerobic andanaerobic responses during high-intensity exercise
have further verified these time of day differences
Effects of Sleep Extension on Athletic Performance—Mah et alTable 4—Athletic performance measures at baseline and end sleep extension
Baseline< 0.001

Free throws (out of 10)
Mean days of data

7.9 ± 0.99
9.2 ± 3.6

8.8 ± 0.97
6.9 ± 1.2

< 0.001

Three-point field goals (out of 15)
Mean days of data

10.2 ± 2.14
9.2 ± 3.6

11.6 ± 1.50
6.9 ± 1.2

< 0.001

Subject self-rating at practices (1-10)
Mean days of data

6.9 ± 1.41
8.9 ± 3.5

8.8 ± 1.06
6.8 ± 1.3

< 0.001

Subject self-rating at games (1-10)
Mean days of data

7.8 ± 1.07
4.2 ± 1.7

8.8 ± 1.19
3.7 ± 0.5

< 0.001

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.

100

0

-100

-200
10

20

30

40

P

16.2 ± 0.61 15.5 ± 0.54
9.2 ± 3.6
6.9 ± 1.2

200

0

End Sleep
Extension

282 feet sprint (sec)Mean days of data

Change in Sprint Time from Baseline (sec)Change in Mean RT to Evening PVT (ms)in physical performance.22 In professional sports, Smithet al. found circadian rhythms affected games played byWest Coast teams in the National Football League.23 West
Coast teams had a higher tendency to win not only home
games, but also away games on the East Coast, likely due
to differences in circadian rhythms between the two teams.
Although the East Coast games were played at night, West
Coast teams had not yet adjusted to the 3-hour time difference, and thus perceived the games to be closer to the lateafternoon West Coast time, which has been suggested as amore optimal time of day for peak performance.24-26
In the current study, from baseline to the end of 5-7
weeks of sleep extension, there was an increase in meanbasketball shooting accuracy as indicated by an increasein the percentage of successful shots for both free throws(9% improvement) and 3-point field goals (9.2% improvement). Following extended sleep, subjects also notably increased their speed resulting in faster sprint times (0.7 sec

50

1

0

-1

-2
0

10

20

30

40

50

Day of Sleep Extension

Day of Sleep Extension

Figure 2—Change in 282 feet sprint time during sleep extension
compared to baseline. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Figure 1—Change in mean daily evening PVT during sleep extension
compared to baseline. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Table 5—Athletic performance measures at baseline and end sleep extension by subject
Subject

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

282 Feet Sprint (sec)Baseline
15.62 ± 0.34
17.38 ± 0.46
15.84 ± 0.81
15.74 ± 0.17
16.76 ± 0.31
16.19 ± 0.75
16.76 ± 0.16
16.00 ± 0.16
16.45 ± 0.14
15.91 ± 0.25
16.65 ± 0.16

End Sleep
Extension
14.94 ± 0.28
15.71 ± 0.08
14.98 ± 0.17
14.86 ± 0.13
15.73 ± 0.38
15.66 ± 0.40
16.23 ± 0.11
15.69 ± 0.16
16.29 ± 0.04
11.43 ± 1.40
15.83 ± 0.09

Free Throws (out of 10)
Baseline
8.7 ± 1.0
7.7 ± 0.5
7.6 ± 0.7
7.9 ± 0.6
7.6 ± 0.5
8.0 ± 0.6
8.1 ± 1.5
8.1 ± 0.6
7.3 ± 1.0
8.0 ± 1.1
7.4 ± 1.1

End Sleep
Extension
8.8 ± 0.7
9.3 ± 0.7
9.8 ± 0.5
8.8 ± 0.7
8.5 ± 0.9
8.6 ± 1.4
8.7 ± 1.1
8.2 ± 1.5
8.4 ± 0.5
8.9 ± 1.1
9.5 ± 0.5

Three-Point Field Goals(out of 15)
Baseline
12.1 ± 1.9
9.2 ± 1.0
9.5 ± 2.4
7.9 ± 1.1
6.8 ± 1.1
9.7 ± 1.4
8.1 ± 1.5
11.7 ± 1.6
10.7 ± 1.5
11.3 ± 1.4
9.6 ± 1.7

End Sleep
Extension
12.0 ± 1.7
11.5 ± 1.1
10.0 ± 0.8
11.3 ± 0.7
10.8 ± 0.7
10.0 ± 1.2
13.0 ± 1.5
11.3 ± 1.0
11.4 ± 1.4
11.9 ± 1.2
13.8 ± 0.8

Days of Data
Baseline
13.0
6.0
8.0
9.0
5.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
9.0
18.0
9.0

End Sleep
Extension
8.0
8.0
4.0
8.0
8.0
7.0
7.0
6.0
7.0
7.0
6.0

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
SLEEP, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2011947

Effects of Sleep Extension on Athletic Performance—Mah et al

As with most sports, an athlete’s mental approach is crucial
for both training and competition. With an increase in total sleep
time, subjects reported an improved self-perception of performance during practices and games. Subject testimonials corroborated these rating scores and suggested a subjective quicker
physical recovery, improved weight training and conditioning,
and fewer injuries. These findings suggest that obtaining extra sleep likely has beneficial effects on overall well-being andthe mental approach to athletics. Further research can examine
these findings in more detail.
A common assumption in most sports is that athletes become
increasingly tired and fatigued throughout a season. Whether
or not this is true, this study, by showing that sleep extension
lowers POMS fatigue scores and improves POMS vigor ratings, indicates that these assumed negative mood changes can
be avoided. Sleep extension may also contribute to athletic performance by minimizing the assumed cumulative effects of alengthy season and limiting an athlete’s perception of tiredness
and fatigue. Additional sleep time improved mood even overthe course of a competitive season. These results are consistent
with the Kamdar et al. study8 that also noted mood improvements in the POMS fatigue and vigor subscales in undergraduate students following sleep extension for several weeks.
In summary, the traditional focus of both off-season andin-season training has been on daily training, conditioning,weight lifting, nutrition, and coaching. This was likewise thecase for this study’s subjects who attested they were alreadyat their peak performance prior to starting the study, since they
had just completed their pre-season training and were beginning regular season competition. However, after experiencing
improvements in physical performance and mood following
sleep extension, subjects acknowledged that they had previously misperceived the amount of sleep required to perform attheir peak both physically and mentally. Thus, athletes should
be better able to obtain their full athletic potential if optimal
sleep is integrated into their daily training regimen.
While this investigation focused specifically on assessing basketball athletic performance, future studies will needto examine additional sports and improve the measurements
of athletic ability. In particular, the number of performance
tests as well as their ability to accurately reflect competitive
performance should be further addressed. The more valuable
measures of athletic performance will be those tailored to theparticular sport of interest and those that directly assess performance during actual competition rather than practice.
More globally, accounting for differences between team versus individual sports is a critical consideration when examining other sports. For example, due to the heavy dependence on
teamwork with others in sports such as basketball and football,
it is difficult to clearly identify individual performance and asingle player’s effect on a game’s outcome. Naturally, there aresome sports where individual outcomes are fairly independentof teammates’ actions and are already recorded by traditional
statistics, such as batting average and pitching in baseball andserving percentage in tennis. These sports more readily lendthemselves to comparing performance in actual competition.
Furthermore, sports that are solely dependent on the individual,such as swimming and track and field, more easily compareindividual competition outcomes.

Table 6—Daytime sleepiness and mood at baseline and end sleep extension
End Sleep
Baseline
Extension
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
9.64 ± 3.80
3.36 ± 1.69
Range
4 - 16
1-7
POMS Vigor
11.71 ± 5.31 18.14 ± 5.57
POMS Fatigue
8.24 ± 5.28
1.45 ± 2.46
POMS Tension
5.26 ± 3.24
2.73 ± 2.25
POMS Depression
2.95 ± 3.53
0.59 ± 1.14
POMS Anger
4.24 ± 5.39
1.05 ± 1.68
POMS Confusion
4.79 ± 2.28
1.95 ± 1.40
POMS Total Mood Disturbance 13.76 ± 17.17 -10.36 ± 9.62

P
< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
0.006
0.002< 0.001< 0.001

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.

faster). The improvement in sprinting after obtaining additional
sleep is consistent with the Waterhouse et al. study that founda short nap following partial sleep loss improved sprint time.12
Similarly, the improvement in PVT reaction time seen in thisstudy parallels an earlier investigation that found faster reaction
time when nocturnal sleep was extended to 10 h/night for several days.27 On the other hand, Belenky et al.18 showed that PVT
speed in subjects who obtained 5 and 7 h of sleep demonstrated
no evidence of recovery after 3 consecutive 8-h nights of sleep.
This is similar to the nonsignificant changes in cognitive performance tests seen after 4 days of extended sleep.14 However, thesleep recovery and extension periods in both these studies may
not have been of sufficient duration to reveal improvements inreaction time. In contrast, the present study involved a much
longer period (5-7 weeks of sleep extension) and found a significant increase in PVT reaction time. It is likely that a longer
period of sleep extension is crucial to obtaining significant PVT
and other performance improvements.
We conducted this study under the assumption that the vast
majority of collegiate athletes carry a sizable sleep debt due tochronic sleep deprivation. The total nightly baseline sleep time
during this study (6.68 h) is consistent with the findings of previous studies examining the prevalence of insufficient sleep in
the general public.28-30 Daytime sleepiness was confirmed by thebaseline ESS scores as well as the substantial decrease in scores
following sleep extension. This further supports the findings ofRoehrs et al., in which sleep extension over 6 days improved
alertness and reduced daytime sleepiness in sleepy subjects.27
Furthermore, Barbato et al. revealed that by extending time in
bed to 14 h/day for 4 weeks, subjects demonstrated mood andenergy improvements.31 The results of the current study suggest
similar trends consistent with these earlier investigations.
It is unclear whether this period of sleep extension eliminated all sleep debt. Without utilizing an MSLT, it is very difficult to determine whether objective sleepiness, and thus sleep
debt, was completely eliminated. Nonetheless, the length ofsleep extension in this study and the findings of decreased ESS
scores indicative of reduced levels of daytime sleepiness suggest that subjects substantially reduced their sleep debt. Futurestudies could possibly utilize longer sleep extension periods. It
is possible that at some point athletic indices, reaction time, andmood scores would no longer improve.
SLEEP, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2011

948

Effects of Sleep Extension on Athletic Performance—Mah et al

This study was designed with the goal of examining sleep extension and athletic performance in a controlled setting. To thisend, only standardized measures performed in practice that arereadily repeatable were used to ensure that results were individually based and minimally reliant on a myriad of in-game variables, such as teamwork mentioned above. Other variables that
also influence game performance include the opposing team,the subject’s specific opponent, playing time, league standings,
game situation, and the shot clock. Furthermore, additional factors that complicate interpreting game data include the varying
distance of field goal attempts, the small number of shots a subject takes, and the limited number of games compared to practices. Importantly, subjective ratings from games were included,
as they are not affected by the aforementioned factors.
Another important feature of this study is that it was conducted during the NCAA season and included an athlete’s occasionally variable daily schedule of practices, games, and travel.
By monitoring collegiate athletes during an actual competitive
season, this study accurately reflects the potential improvementsthat sleep extension can have on athletic performance despite theinconsistent schedule of collegiate and professional sports. Furthermore, athletes were able to fulfill their typical personal, work,and training activities and obligations while also extending their
total sleep time. In so doing, this study shows that extended sleep
is realistically obtainable during training and competition.
The results of this study strongly suggest that the less frequently considered approach of extending total sleep time may
perhaps be the one with the most potential for positive impact
on athletic performance. For an athlete to reach optimal performance, an accurate knowledge of one’s nightly sleep requirement and obtaining this amount should be considered integral
factors in an athlete’s daily training regimen. An additional factor to be considered beyond the nightly sleep requirement is
how one’s quality of sleep affects athletic performance, as it has
been reported that a substantial number of elite athletes experienced poor sleep quality.32 It is clear that increasing the application of sleep knowledge within individual athletes and athletic
programs can be a valuable and likely performance enhancing
strategy in all sports at all levels.

Due to the travel schedule, subjects frequently had difficulty
maintaining a rigid sleep-wake schedule because they did nothave complete control over their sleep-wake times. When subjects were unable to reach the nightly sleep goal of 10 h, they
were encouraged to nap during the day. Occasionally, actigraphy measurements were limited due to abnormal napping situations where movement was a result of the transportation by bus
or plane rather than the subject. On a few rare occasions, suchas immediately after a practice, subjects took daytime naps but
were not wearing their actigraphy device. This resulted in lower
actigraphy sleep time for a limited number of napping periods,
and therefore, lower total objective sleep time overall.
This study was conducted in-season on the assumption that
subjects were entering the study at a high performance level
after training year-round and experiencing many of their typicalphysical performance gains during the off-season. Typically, anathlete’s goal is to maintain their performance throughout thelong season and ward off the effects of fatigue and wear on
their bodies. Additionally, the athletic performance measures
were not novel to the subject, as they had previously performed
the drills during training on a regular basis for many years. For
these reasons, this design aimed to minimize practice effects inathletic training. To help address the possible practice and attention effects that may have influenced outcomes, the number ofdays of data used for data analysis are included on Tables 2-5.
We believe that all of the above supports the hypothesis that theobserved effects are due to sleep extension. Furthermore, thisstudy included 5 athletic performance outcomes, 2 assessments(ESS and POMS), and various PVT outcomes. Adjustment for
multiple comparisons was not performed; however, the consistent pattern of changes across these measures may suggest thatthe changes are meaningful in spite of this lack of adjustment.
In regard to study design, this investigation aimed at beginning to elucidate the impact of sleep extension on athletic performance by examining repeatable measures in practice. This
study design was employed because the controlled practice setting allowed for standardized and readily repeatable measuresof performance with outcomes that are less attributable to the
myriad of in-game variables. Although the goal of the present
study was to begin to understand the role of sleep extension andthe impact on specific athletic performance measures, there isclear value in investigating in-game performance, which could
be examined in a larger future study.
Finally, alternative study designs, such as a Latin Square andcontrolled designs, could be considered for future studies and arelikely feasible with traditional sleep study subjects obtained froma heterogeneous population who exercise recreationally. However, elite, collegiate athletes are highly unlikely to participate inthese types of study design if the perceived or potential negatives
outweigh the benefits as exemplified by the 2 athletes who declined to enroll after expressing initial interest. In our post-study
conversations with athletes, they are unlikely to participate in astudy if they obtain positive results because of a specific protocol,
but then are precluded from adhering to this protocol because of
the study design, such as in a Latin Square. Similarly, an athlete isunlikely to participate in any study with a perceived or potential
negative effect on their performance or without possible benefit,
such as in a control arm. This study had the special opportunity ofusing a study population of actively competing varsity athletes,

Limitations
A typical collegiate basketball team includes 15 or fewer
players who participate for at least 4 years, which naturally
limited the number of potential subjects that could be enrolled
simultaneously and resulted in a small sample size of 11 subjects. Future studies would benefit from enrolling a larger study
population. Even so, this study was able to include a substantial
percentage and representative sample of the basketball teamover 2 seasons to investigate sleep extension. Furthermore,comparisons of subjects’ baseline to sleep extension measurements rather than controls were employed due to the limited
overall number of available and interested athletes on the team.
Also, a traditional control arm in a study with actively competing athletes on the same team is very difficult, due to small
team size and logistics, while using comparisons of subjects’baseline to sleep extension measurements allowed the investigators to elucidate relevant in-season performance in relation to
sleep extension. Future studies would benefit from a traditional
control arm if feasible.
SLEEP, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2011949

Effects of Sleep Extension on Athletic Performance—Mah et aland recognizes that not having a control group or a crossover arm
has its limitations. This population has its own unique challenges,
but is a valuable population for examining whether sleep extension might have a role in athletic performance.

5. Reilly T, Piercy M. The effect of partial sleep deprivation on weight-lifting performance. Ergonomics 1994;37:107-15.
6. Edwards BJ, Waterhouse J. Effects of one night of partial sleep deprivation upon diurnal rhythms of accuracy and consistency in throwing darts.
Chronobiol Int 2009;26:756-68.
7. Carskadon MA, Dement WC. Nocturnal determinants of daytime sleepiness. Sleep 1982;5:S73-81.
8. Kamdar BB, Kaplan KA, Kezirian EJ, Dement WC. The impact of extended sleep on daytime alertness, vigilance, and mood. Sleep Med
2004;5:441-8.
9. Carskadon MA, Mancuso J, Keenan S, Littell W, Dement WC. Sleepinessfollowing oversleeping. Sleep Res 1986:15:70.
10. Dinges DF, Orne MT, Whitehouse WG, Orne EC. Temporal placement ofa nap for alertness: contributions of circadian phase and prior wakefulness. Sleep 1987;10:313-29.
11. Gillberg M, Kecklund G, Axelsson J, Akerstedt T. The effects of a short
daytime nap after restricted night sleep. Sleep 1996;19:570-5.
12. Waterhouse J, Atkinson G, Edwards B, Reilly T. The role of a short postlunch nap in improving cognitive, motor, and sprint performance in participants with partial sleep deprivation. J Sports Sci 2007;25:1557-66.
13. Taub JM, Globus GG, Phoebus E, Drury R. Extended sleep and performance. Nature 1971;233:142-3.
14. Carskadon MA, Dement WC. Sleep tendency during extension of nocturnal sleep. Sleep Res 1979;8:147.
15. Littner M, Kushida CA, Anderson WM, et al. Practice parameters for therole of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms: an updatefor 2002. Sleep 2003;26:337-41.
16. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth
sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991;14:540-5.
17. McNair DM, Loor M, Droppleman LF. Profile of mood states. San Diego,
CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1981.
18. Belenky G, Wesensten N, Thorne D, et al. Patterns of performance degradation and restoration during sleep restriction and subsequent recovery: asleep dose-response study. J Sleep Res 2003;12:1-12.
19. Dinges DF, Powell JW. Microcomputer analyses of performance on a portable, simple, visual RT task during sustained operations. Behav Res Meth
Instrum Comput 1985;17:652-55.
20. Hill DW, Hill CM, Fields KL, Smith JC. Effects of jet lag on factors related to sport performance. Can J Appl Physiol 1993;18:91-103.
21. Kline CE, Durstine JL, Davis JM, et al. Circadian variation in swim performance. J Appl Physiol 2007;102:641-9.
22. Hill DW, Borden DO, Darnaby KM, Hendricks DN, Hill CM. Effect oftime of day on aerobic and anaerobic responses to high-intensity exercise.
Can J Sport Sci 1992;17:316-9.
23. Smith RS, Guilleminault C, Efron B. Circadian rhythms and enhanced
athletic performance in the national football league. Sleep 1997;20:362-5.
24. Baxter C, Reilly T. Influence of time of day on all-out swimming. Br J
Sports Med 1983;17:122-7.
25. Winget CM, DeRoshia CW, Holley DC. Circadian rhythms and athletic
performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985;17:498-516.
26. Reilly T, Atkinson G, Edwards B, Waterhouse J, Farrelly K, Fairhurst
E. Diurnal variation in temperature, mental and physical performance,
and tasks specifically related to football (soccer). Chronobiol Int
2007;24:507-19.
27. Roehrs T, Timms V, Zwyghuizen-Doorenbos A, Roth T. Sleep extension
in sleepy and alert normals. Sleep 1989;12:449-57.
28. Bonnet MH, Arand DL. We are chronically sleep deprived. Sleep
1995;18:908-11.
29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Perceived insufficient
rest or sleep among adults – United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2009; 58:1175-9.
30. Levine B, Roehrs T, Zorick F, Roth T. Daytime sleepiness in young adults.
Sleep 1988;11:39-46.
31. Barbato G, Barker C, Bender C, Giesen HA, Wehr TA. Extended sleepin humans in 14 hour nights (LD 10:14): relationship between REM density and spontaneous awakening. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
1994;90:291-7.
32. Samuels C. Sleep, recovery, and performance: the new frontier in highperformance athletics. Neurol Clin 2008;26:169-80.

CONCLUSIONS
Extended sleep beyond one’s habitual nightly sleep likely
contributes to improved athletic performance, reaction time,
daytime sleepiness, and mood. Improvements in shooting percentage, sprint times, reaction time, mood, fatigue, and vigor
were all observed with increased total sleep time. These improvements following sleep extension suggest that peak performance can only occur when an athlete’s overall sleep and sleep
habits are optimal. Furthermore, this study reveals an athlete’s
inability to accurately assess how much sleep one actually obtains each night, thus leading to a misperception regarding theduration of sleep that constitutes adequate nightly sleep time.
As additional knowledge further illuminates the relationshipbetween sleep and athletic performance, it is likely that optimal
sleep habits and obtaining adequate sleep will play an importantrole in peak performance in all levels of sports.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The study was conducted at Maples Pavilion, Stanford
University, Stanford, CA. The authors thank Juan Pablo Reggiardo, Donny Guerinoni, Chris Bobel, Preston Greene, andKeith D’Amelio for their daily assistance in monitoring athletic
performance measures. The authors also thank Clete Kushida,
MD, PhD for his critical reading of the manuscript.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
This was not an industry supported study, but Philips Respironics loaned actigraphy devices to the study investigators. Ms.
Mah has consulted for NightCare. Dr. Kezirian has consulted
for Apnex Medical, ArthroCare, Medtronic, Pavad Medical, and
ReVENT Medical. He has a career development award fromthe National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) of the
National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Triological Society
Research Career Development Award of the American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society. His work wasalso supported by NIH/NCRR/OD UCSF-CTSI Grant Number
KL2 RR024130. Its contents are solely the responsibility of theauthors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the
NIH. Dr. Dement has received honorariums from Bellin Health
Systems Inc., Kansas Association of Sleep Professionals, andMitsubishi Pharmaceutical. The other authors have indicated nofinancial conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES

1. Dinges DF, Pack F, Williams K, et al. Cumulative sleepiness, mood disturbance, and psychomotor vigilance performance decrements during aweek of sleep restricted to 4-5 hours per night. Sleep 1997;20:267-77.
2. Carskadon MA, Dement WC. Cumulative effects of sleep restriction on
daytime sleepiness. Psychophysiology 1981;18:107-13.
3. Van Dongen HP, Maislin G, Mullington JM, Dinges DF. The cumulative
cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral
functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total
sleep deprivation. Sleep 2003;26:117-26.
4. Mougin F, Simon-Rigaud M, Davenne D, et al. Effects of sleep disturbances on subsequent physical performance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup
Physiol 1991;63:77-82.

SLEEP, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2011950

Effects of Sleep Extension on Athletic Performance—Mah et al