Advances in Biological Chemistry, 2015, 5, 16-23
Published Online February 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/abc
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abc.2015.51002

Development of Preparative
Chromatography for Proteomic Approach ofMycorrhizal Symbiosis
Tomoko Matsubara*, Takaaki Ishii
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto, Japan
Email: *s810631049@kpu.ac.jp
Received 23 December 2014; accepted 27 January 2015; published 2 February 2015
Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract
Although mechanism of symbiosis between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and host plants
has been investigated by genetic analysis, very little knowledge has been obtained because genome analysis of AMF is not perfect yet. Thus, we tried to develop mass purification of proteinsusing preparative chromatography in order to accelerate roteomic analysis of proteins related tomycorrhizal symbiosis, such as 24 and 53 kDa proteins. In particular, our data showed that 53 kDa
proteins would be restrictively expressed when mycorrhizal fungi and host plants were stressed.
However, 24 kDa proteins, which appear to be a usable indicator for the existence of various mycorrhizal fungi, were habitually detected in not only AMF but also other mycorrhizal fungi such as
ectomycorrhizal fungi (EF). Moreover, we discovered new preparative chromatographical techniques for isolation and mass purification of those proteins. We are convinced that this chromatographical technique will greatly contribute to proteomic approach of mycorrhizal symbiosis.

Keywords
24 kDa Protein, Mycorrhizal Fungi, Preparative Chromatography, Proteomic Analysis, Symbiosis

1. Introduction
Although importance of AMF for sustainable food production is widely known, the mechanism of AMF symbiosis is not so clear. Since AMF have been known to be multinuclear and multiform [1] and to take away cellnuclei from plant hosts [2], it is difficult to approach from genome sequence and often causes confusion in classification of species [3]. Therefore, we focused on proteomic approach for identification of proteins related to*Corresponding author.

How to cite this paper: Matsubara, T. and Ishii, T. (2015) Development of Preparative Chromatography for Proteomic Approach of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Advances in Biological Chemistry, 5, 16-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abc.2015.51002

T. Matsubara, T. Ishii

mycorrhizal symbiosis, which would indicate the expression of genes in AMF. Our previous reports show that
AMF [4] and orchid mycorrhizal fungi (OMF) [5] have proteins of 24 and 53 kDa in molecular weight that arerelated to mycorrhizal symbiosis. These facts indicate that various kinds of mycorrhizal fungi will have similarproteins for symbiotic relationship with plants. However, now there are no useful techniques for mass purification of the proteins, which contribute to proteomic approach of mycorrhizal symbiosis.
Therefore, we examined not only separation of proteins related to mycorrhizal symbiosis in AMF and EF using SDS-PAGE techniques, but also development of new preparative chromatography for isolation and mass purification of the proteins on proteomic approach of the symbiosis.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1. SDS-PAGE of ProteinsIn this experiment, we used pot-cultured bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flügge.) roots inoculated with andwithout Glomus clarum, AMF spores, such as Gigaspora albida, Gigaspora margarita and G. clarum, stocked
in a refrigerator at 4˚C, and EF hyphae, such as Tricholoma matsutake (NBRC 6933) at 4, 25 and 40˚C andRhizopogon roseolus at 25˚C in Ebios media.
Crude proteins were extracted from 5 g of bahiagrass roots inoculated with and without G. clarum, approximately 5000 of AMF spores, and approximately 0.1 g of EF hyphae by modified methods of Shannon et al. [6].
That is, these samples were homogenized with 0.05 M Tris buffer (pH 7.5) containing 0.05 M NaCl, and thenthe homogenates were filtered through a cheese cloth. After ammonium sulfate were added into the liquid to 35%
saturation, they were stood overnight at 4˚C. They were centrifuged at 8000 g for 30 min and then added ammonium sulfate into the supernatant to 95% saturation. After standing overnight at 4˚C, they were centrifuged at8000 g for 30 min and then the residues were dissolved in 2 ml of 0.005 M Tris buffer (pH 7.0). Dialyzation wasdone against 0.005 M Tris buffer (pH 8.0) containing 0.1 M KCl for overnight. After centrifugation at 8000 g
for 30 min, we obtained the supernatant with crude proteins.
To detect 24 and 53 kDa proteins in the crude proteins, the SDS-PAGE was carried out by the methods ofLaemmli [7]. Each of the crude proteins obtained from bahiagrass roots, Gi. albida, Gi. margarita, G. clarum, T.
matsutake and R. roseolus were used, and the protein bands on the SDS-PAGE gel plates were analyzed by theiMeasure Scan software (iMeasure Inc.).

2.2. Isolation and Mass Purification of Proteins by Chromatography
As shown in Figure 1, we developed a new method for isolating and purifying 24 kDa protein related to mycorrhizal symbiosis from crude proteins of soybean (Glycine max) roots inoculated with Glomus intraradicesand sod-cultured peach orchard soil. That is, crude proteins were extracted by modified procedures of Shannon
et al. [6], and then were separated by medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) with a Diol column toremove ammonium sulfate and to obtain the fractions including 24 and 53 kDa proteins. The solvent was 0.001
M Tris-HCl + 0.001 M NaCl (pH 7.5) and the flow rate was 3 ml/min. A detecter was used at 280 nm. Moreover,
we purified these proteins on gradient methods using a preparative high pressure liquid chromatograph (HPLC)
with a Diol column.

2.3. Properties of 24 kDa Protein
To analyze the properties of pure 24 kDa protein related to mycorrhizal symbiosis, the protein solution wasspotted on thin-layer chromatographic plates, and then various stains, such as ninhydrin, Rhodamine 6G, fluorescein, Dittmer reagent, FeCl2 and hydroxylamine chloride, were sprayed on protein spots. Then, color changesof the spots were observed.

3. Results
Although non-mycorrhizal bahiagrass roots have no 24 and 53 kDa proteins (Figure 2), 24 kDa proteins weredetected in all of crude proteins extracted from mycorrhizal samples (Figures 2, 3 and 4), but 53 kDa proteins
were not detected in crude proteins of T. matsutake cultured at 25˚C (Figure 3). The 53 kDa proteins were appeared when T. matsutake was cultured under low or high temperature stressed conditions such as 4˚C and 40˚C17

T. Matsubara, T. Ishii
Roots 40 g

Soils 100 g↓↓
Shook with 200 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer(pH 7) containing 0.01 M EDTA and 0.3 M KCl

Homogenized with 80 ml of 0.001 M Tris-HClbuffer (pH 7.5) containing 0.001 M NaCl↓↓

Extracted crude proteins by modified methods of Shannon et al. (1966)
Filtered the homogenates through a cheese cloth.
Added ammonium sulfate into the liquid to 35% saturation.
Stood overnight at 4ºC and then centrifuged at 8000 g for 30 min.
Added ammonium sulfate into the supernatant to 95% saturation.
Stood overnight at 4ºC and then centrifuged at 8000 g for 30 min.
Residues were dissolved in 2 ml of 0.005 M Tris buffer (pH 7.0).
↓
Removed ammonium sulfate and fractionated crude proteins using a MPLC
Column: Diol (75-200 μm) (Fuji Silysia Chemical Ltd. ), φ35×400 mm
Solvent: 0.001 M Tris-HCl + 0.001 M NaCl (pH=7.5)
Flow rate: 3 ml/min, UV: 280 nm↓
Isolated 24 kDa proteins using a preparative HPLC with a Diol column by gradient methods
Column: Develosil 300 Diol (Nomura Chemical Co., Ltd. ), φ10×250 mm
Solvent: 0-10 min 0.001 M Tris-HCl + 0.001 M NaCl (pH=7.5)
10-50 min 0.001 M Tris-HCl + 0.001 M NaCl (pH=6.5)
50-60 min 0.001 M Tris-HCl + 0.001 M NaCl (pH=7.5)
Flow rate: 0.5 ml/min, Temperature: 20℃, UV: 280 nm

Figure 1. Procedures for the extraction and purification of proteins in roots and soils.

Glomus clarum

Bahiagrass withG. clarum

Bahiagrass withoutG. clarum

Molecular weight

HighLow

Figure 2. Densitograms of crude proteins extracted from Glomus clarum spores and inoculated bahiagrass roots. Bahiagrass roots were harvested on September 6th. White and blackarrows show 53 and 24 kDa proteins, respectively. An asterisk shows no significant peak for
53 kDa proteins in bahiagrass without AMF.

18

T. Matsubara, T. Ishii

4˚C25˚C40˚CHigh

Molecular weight

Low

Figure 3. Densitograms of crude proteins T. matsutake at 4˚C, 25˚C and 40˚C for 3 days. White and black arrows show 53and 24 kDa proteins, respectively. An asterisk shows no significant peak for 53 kDa proteins at 25˚C.

GigasporaalbidaGigasporamargarita

Rhozopogonroseolus

Molecular weightHighLow

Figure 4. Densitograms of crude proteins extracted from other AMF and ectomycorrhizal fungi. White and black arrows
show 53 and 24 kDa proteins, respectively.

19

T. Matsubara, T. Ishii(Figure 3). The 53 kDa proteins were also detected in pot-cultured bahiagrass roots inoculated with AMF, all
AMF spores stored at 4˚C and R. roseolus cultured at 25˚C (Figure 2 and Figure 4).
On mass purification of proteins, both of preparative chromatographs, MPLC and HPLC, with a Diol column
were very useful for isolating and purifying great amounts of crude proteins extracted by ammonium sulfate
precipitation. Moreover, a gradient method on preparative HPLC using a Diol column separated each protein in
24 kDa protein fraction. As shown in Figure 5(a), the chromatogram of soil proteins fractionated by an isochromatic method on a preparative HPLC with a Diol column shows existence of 24 kDa proteins as well as mycorrhizal fungi and plant roots, but it was impossible to isolate pure 24 kDa protein (Peak 5) related to mycorrhizal symbiosis from the 24 kDa protein fraction. The development of a gradient method on preparative HPLC,
however, solved the isolation of the same or almost the same as molecular weight of proteins. Thus, it became
possible to isolate the pure 24 kDa protein (Figure 5(b) and Figure 6).
The properties of the 24 kDa protein purified were analyzed using some kinds of stains (Table 1). That is, thedetection by Rhodamine 6G showed that the 24 kDa protein is bound with lipids. Other stains, such as fluorescein, Dittmer reagent, FeCl2 and hydroxylamine chloride, showed that the lipids were simple ones such as
ester lipids, sterol lipids and non-phospholipids. The pink spot made by ninhydrin indicated the existence ofpeptides. Therefore, the pure 24 kDa protein was lipoproteins with ester and sterol lipids (Table 1).

Figure 5. Chromatogram of soil proteins fractionated by HPLC. (a) Isochromatic methods
Column: Develosil 300 Diol, φ 10 × 250 mm, Solvent: 0.001 M Tris-HCl + 0.001 M NaCl
(pH = 7.5), Flow rate: 0.5 ml/min, Temperature: 20˚C, UV: 280 nm; (b) Gradient methods(see in Figure 1).

20

T. Matsubara, T. Ishii

010203040Retention time (min)50Figure 6. A chromatogram of 24 kDa proteins ofGlomus intraradices-inoculated soybean roots fractionated by gradient HPLC. Gradient methods: see inFigure 1. The black arrow shows 24 kDa proteins in
the electrophoresis with SDS plates.
Table 1. The properties of a 24 kDa protein using some kinds of stains.
StainsSpot colorDecisionNinhydrin

Slight pink

Amino groups

Rhodamine 6G

OrangeLipids

Fluorescein

Yellow

Simple lipids

Dittmer reagent-Non phospholipids

FeCl2

PurpleSterol lipids

Hydroxylamine chloride

Slight purple

Ester lipids

4. Discussion
The results of SDS-PAGE indicated that 24 kDa proteins were habitually detected in not only AMF [3], OMF [4]and ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (unpublished), but AMF and EF used. Therefore, the proteins would be related tosymbiosis between plants and mycorrhizal fungi. Furthermore, pure 24 kDa protein, which isolated from crude
24 kDa proteins by preparative chromatography, was revealed to be lipoproteins. It suggests that the protein issimilar to non-specific lipid transporter proteins with anti-fungal activity reported by Bazghaleh et al. [8]. The
24 kDa protein can be related to formation or maintenance of membrane structure of mycorrhizal fungi at insideor around plant roots and protects their hosts from pathogenic fungi.
On the other hand, 53 kDa proteins seem to be expressed only when mycorrhizal fungi and host plants werestressed, because the proteins in T. matsutake had appeared at 4˚C and 40˚C. Further, the expression of the pro-21

T. Matsubara, T. Ishii

teins in pot-cultured bahiagrass roots may result from water stress in summer. These results suggest that theproteins will be glomalin-like proteins which relieve cells from stresses. Glomalin has been already known as
glycoprotein weighs approximately 60 kDa [9], which has similarity to heat shock protein 60 [10].
New creative technique of chromatography developed is very useful for isolation and mass purification ofpure 24 kDa protein related to mycorrhizal symbiosis. The protein would contribute to the development of reagents which can detect mycorrhizal fungi by the immunologic analysis. Therefore, sufficient amounts of pure
objective protein for building up antibodies are required.
The Diol column has the ability of gel filtration. Thus, our results indicate that MPLC with the Diol column
can easily remove ammonium sulfate from large amounts of proteins without conventional dialysis. Moreover,the Diol column in preparative HPLC is effective in isolating single protein from proteins in similar molecularweight under pH gradient conditions. Except for gel filtration of the Diol column, the column would show positive electric charge of silica residue, since this has small amounts of silica without a Diol group. That is, the pH
gradient method in range of pH 7.5 - 6.5 causes that silica without the Diol group becomes positively charged,
so that retention time of each protein is slightly changed. Although the idea of preparative HPLC in gradientmethods for proteins had been already reported by Unger et al. [11], the methods have been not utilized. One ofthe possible reason would be that the pH range used in their experiments was pH 2.0 - 5.0, so that their methods
were usable only for proteins stable at low pH. The fact that the pure protein was isolated at pH near 7.0 was anadvantage of our methods. Further experiments are needed to develop the utility of the Diol column for protein
analysis.
Couto et al. [12] have reported that it is difficult to purify proteins from AMF and plants. One of their insistent reasons were difficulty of removing non-protein compounds in plants or fungal tissues. In this investigation,
however, these compounds were easily removed from crude proteins by MPLC with the Diol column, and large
amounts of the objective proteins were isolated and purified from the crude proteins by gradient preparative
HPLC with the Diol column.
AMF are the most important mycorrhizal fungi, because the AMF can colonize almost all of the plants.
However, it is very difficult to clarify AMF symbiosis using genome sequence, since it is known that the nucleiof AMF are multiform [1]-[3]. Therefore, proteomic approach of mycorrhizal symbiosis is needed. The newchromatographical techniques developed will greatly contribute to the proteomic approach. In particular, thispreparative chromatography would create a new path to analyze proteomically mycorrhizal symbiosis in vitro
using the axenic culture of AMF [13] [14].

5. Conclusion
In order to develop preparative chromatography for proteomic approach of mycorrhizal symbiosis, MPLC andgradient preparative HPLC with the Diol column were very useful for mass purification of proteins related tomycorrhizal symbiosis, such as 24 and 53 kDa proteins. The 53 kDa proteins would be restrictively expressed
under stress conditions, but the 24 kDa proteins were usually detected in all kinds of mycorrhizal fungi. Thesechromatographical techniques will serve mycorrhizal studies as well as other proteomic studies.

Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. Chantal Hamel of Saskatchewan University for providing us with soybean seeds androots.

References[1]

Tisserant, E., et al. (2013) Genome of an Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Provides Insight into the Oldest Plant Symbiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 20117-20122.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313452110[2]Ishii, T., Matsubara, T., Yoneda, M. and Cruz, A.F. (2011) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Increase Their Diversities byTaking Away Cell Nuclei from Plant Hosts. Horticulture Research (Japan), 10, 59.

[3]Krüger, M., Kruger, C., Walker, C., Stockinger, H. and Schußler, A. (2012) Phylogenetic Reference Data for Systematics and Phytotaxonomy of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi from Phylum to Species Level. New Phytologist, 193,970-984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03962.x[4]Ishii, T., Ikeda, T., Rutto, K.L., Cruz, A.F., Matsumoto, I. and Kadoya, K. (1999) Proteins Related to the Mechanism

22T. Matsubara, T. Ishiiof Symbiosis between Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plants. Journal of Japanese Society of Horticultural Science, 68, 229.
[5]

Matsubara, T., Yoneda, M. and Ishii, T. (2012) Fungal Isolate “KMI” Is a New Type of Orchid Mycorrhizal Fungus.
American Journal of Plant Science, 3, 1121-1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.38135[6]

Shannon, L.M., Kay, E. and Lew, J.Y. (1966) Peroxidase Isozymes from Horseradish Roots. 1. Isolation and PhysicalProperties. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 241, 166-2172.

[7]

Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature,227, 680-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/227680a0[8]Bazghaleh, N., Hamel, C., Knight, J.D., Gan, Y., Vujanovic, V., Tar’an, B., Cruz, A.F. and Ishii, T. (2012) Phytochemical Regulation of Soil Health Chickpea’s Tool Box. Pulse Cluster Annual Meeting, Niagara Falls, 5-6 November
2012.

[9]Wright, S.F. and Upadhyaya, A. (1996) Extraction of an Abundant and Unusual Protein from Soil and Comparisonwith Hyphal Protein of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Soil Science, 161, 575-586.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199609000-00003[10] Gadkar, V. and Rillig, M.C. (2006) The Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Protein Glomalin Is a Putative Homolog ofHeat Shock Protein 60. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 263, 93-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00412.x[11] Unger, K.K., Janzen, R. and Jilge, G. (1987) Packings and Stationary Phases for Biopolymer Separations by HPLC.
Chromatographia, 24, 144-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02688477[12] Couto, M.S.R., Paulo, E.L., Wipf, D. and Gaudot, E.D. (2013) Proteomic Studies of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Associations. Advances in Biological Chemistry, 3, 48-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abc.2013.31007[13] Ishii, T. and Horii, S. (2007) Culture of Mycorrhizal Fungi. Patent No. 4979551, Japan Patent Office.
[14] Ishii, T. (2014) The Role and Use of Mycorrhizal Fungi. Rural Culture Association, Tokyo.

23