Part 1 - The Manchurian Incident
Chronology
1911 October 10 - Xinhai Revolution
1922 February 6 - Nine-Powers Treaty (Washington Naval Conference)
1931 September 18 - Manchurian Incident
1932 March 1 - Manchukuo is founded
September 4 - Lytton Report is released
1933 March 27 - Japan withdraws from the League of Nations(effective 1935 March 27)
May 31 - Tanggu Truce
1935 June 10 - He-Umezu Agreement
1936 December 12 - Xian Incident
1937 July 7 - Marco Polo Bridge Incident
July 11 - Local ceasefire agreement
July 29 - Tongzhou Massacre
August 9 - Murder of Sublieutenant Oyama
August 13 - Battle of Shanghai
August 15 - Chiang Kai-shek issues general mobilization order
August 21 - Sino-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact
October 2 - Landing of Japan's 10th Army at Hangzhou Bay
leads to the collapse of the Chinese Army in Shanghai
November 5 - Japan makes peace offer through German
Ambassador to China Oskar Trautmann
December 1 - Order to capture Nanking is issued
December 13 - Fall of Nanking, the Japanese Army enters
Nanking
December 22 - Japan reissues its peace terms throughTrautmann
1938 January 16 - First Konoe Statement cuts ties with Chiang Kaishek's regime
November 3 - Second Konoe Statement declares a new order in
Asia
December 22 - Third Konoe Statement enunciates the principles
of friendly relations with neighbors, anti-communism, andeconomic cooperation
1940 March 30 - Establishment of the Republic of China in Nanking
1943 November 5-6 - Greater East Asia Conference is convened in
Tokyo

1

How did 10,400 Japanese soldiers occupy Manchuria?
On September 18, 1931, a line of the South Manchuria Railway at Liutiaogou, about eight
kilometers north of the city of Mukden, was blown apart. Japan's Kwantung Army assumed
this to be the work of Manchurian warlord Zhang Xueliang,1 and so it launched an
immediate attack on Zhang's headquarters of Beidaying. By the following morning, theKwantung Army had routed Zhang's army and occupied Beidaying.
This incident is said to have been secretly engineered by a group of Kwantung Army staff
officers led by Ishiwara Kanji, but circumstances in Manchuria left them with little otherchoice. Zhang Xueliang was actively persecuting the Japanese residents of Manchuria,
including even disavowing their leases which had been recognized by treaty. His promotionof anti-Japanese education touched off a series of attacks on Japanese people, with twelve
such incidents occurring between July and September alone. The most significant were theback-to-back Wanpaoshan and Nakamura Incidents.
(1.) Over two hundred Korean farmers who had moved to the village of Wanpaoshan in
Manchuria were building an irrigation ditch when, suddenly, the Public Safety Officeordered a halt to construction. Chinese soldiers were dispatched to demand the immediate
withdrawal of the farmers and arrest of their ringleaders. The Japanese consulate sought toprotect the Korean farmers, who had been Japanese subjects since the annexation of Korea
in 1910, by sending in armed police, who stood off against thousands of Chinese rioters.2(2.) While travelling to Mongolia, Captain Nakamura, an active duty army officer, andthree attendants were massacred by Chinese regulars. The Chinese attempted to cover up
the incident, but when the truth became known, it sparked an angry outcry in Japan. This
provocation alone was serious enough to have started a war. Ishiwara Kanji's decisive
action was a response to the government's failure to take any effective countermeasuresagainst these repeated illegal acts.
In 1931, Zhang's Northeast Army was a massive force of 250,000 soldiers3 equipped withmodern weaponry. And yet, it was crushed in no time by a mere 10,4004 Kwantung Armysoldiers. The Kwantung Army quickly occupied key cities in southern Manchuria,
1

Zhang Xueliang was the son of Zhang Zuolin, warlord ruler of Manchuria. In December 1928, Zhang
Xueliang swore allegiance to the government of Chiang Kai-shek.
2
Infuriated Koreans attacked the Chinese quarters of cities in Korea such as Seoul, Pyongyang, andSinŭiju, leaving 109 people dead.
3
There were 250,000 regular soldiers and 80,000 irregulars. See Kojo Tanehide's essay "Manchu Jihen
no Genin to Keika" [The Origins and Unfolding of the Manchurian Incident] in "Manshu Jihen no
Keika" [The History of the Manchurian Incident], p. 10.
4The total of 10,400 included a resident division, composed of about 5,400 soldiers, plus the
Independent Garrison, composed of about 5,000 soldiers. By treaty, Japan could station fifteen soldiersfor every kilometer of the South Manchuria Railway's 1,100 kilometers of track. Therefore, the actual
number of Japanese soldiers in Manchuria was considerably fewer than the 16,500 permitted by treaty.

2including Changchun and Jilin, and, in November, took Qiqihar in northern Manchuria.
Within only two months, all strategic sites across the vast territory of Manchuria had been
captured with a military force of just over 10,000 men, plus a few reinforcements from theJapanese Korean Army.
Although one might be tempted to ascribe this to the elite training of the Kwantung Army,
we should recognize that, in the end, victory was possible only thanks to the support of thepeople of Manchuria. A look at Manchuria's financial situation fully reveals just how
extreme the rule of Zhang Zuolin and Zhang Xueliang had been. In the year 1929, annual
revenue amounted to 121 million yuan, but annual expenditure reached 148 million yuan, adeficit of 27 million yuan. One-hundred and two million yuan, or eighty percent of annual
revenue, was spent on maintaining the military. By doing this, the government could
maintain its oversized military, but the costs were borne on the backs of the Manchurian
people. Really, there was probably no one on earth who would be willing to sustain such anarmy.
The appearance of local committees and Manchuria's declarations of independence
September 24, less than a week from the outbreak of the Incident, saw the establishment of
the Mukden Local Self-Government Preservation Committee, which was later reorganized
as the Liaoning Province Local Preservation Committee. This was soon followed on
September 27 with the establishment of the Harbin Special Administrative District Peace
Preservation Committee. On September 28, Liaoning Province, Jilin Province, and Taonan
District all issued declarations of independence.
In this manner, the campaign to found a new country surged in all parts of Manchuria. In
February 1932, the All-Manchuria Joint Convention to Found a New Nation was convened,
which led to the formation of the Northeastern Administrative Committee. Seven men were
elected to serve on the committee, including its chairman, Zhang Jinghui.5 Finally, on
March 1, Manchukuo declared itself an independent nation. Puyi, who had escaped from
Tianjin to Lushun in November, was appointed Chief Executive and later, Emperor.6
The Kwantung Army coordinated the Manchurian independence movement by establishing
new administrative bodies and persuading key leaders to join them with army backing, but
this was not in any way a military government. To create a military government in such avast land with just 10,000 soldiers would have been an impossible task because theremnants of Zhang Xueliang's 250,000-strong regular army and 80,000 irregulars were stillpresent in Manchuria.

5

The six other members of the committee were Zang Shiyi, Xi Qia, Ma Zhanshan, Tang Yulin, Ling
Sheng, and Qi Wang.
6
Puyi (February 7, 1906 - October 17, 1967), of the twelfth generation of the Qing Dynasty, reigned as
the last emperor of China between December 2, 1908 and February 12, 1912.

3

Well before the Manchurian Incident, Manchuria was already a latent hotbed ofpro-independence sentiment, epitomized by the slogans baojing anmin7 and lianshengzizhi.8 As soon as the burden of the warlord government was removed, the independence
movement flourished. The Kwantung Army was seeking to protect Japan's interests, butthese interests coincided with the aspirations of the Manchurian people.

7
8

A regionalist concept literally meaning "defend the borders of Manchuria and keep the people safe".
A federalist concept literally meaning "united but autonomous provinces".

4

The Lytton Report
The famous Lytton Report9 on the Manchurian Incident documented all thesedevelopments in a very accurate manner.
Nevertheless, when addressing the question of whether or not the establishment ofManchukuo reflected the will of the people, the report concluded that popular opinion was
opposed to Manchukuo on the basis of 1,550 letters which the Lytton Commission had
received from ordinary residents. In fact, these letters were the product of a campaign byanti-Manchukuo elements who had not been able to directly present their views to thecommission. That is the reason why the contents of every one of the letters, save two, were
hostile to Manchukuo. The speech of Manchukuo Prime Minister Zhang Jinghui, which I
will quote at length, leaves little doubt that the large majority of Manchurians were notopposed to Manchukuo. Indeed, the only thing that the letters demonstrate is how badly the
Lytton Commission was fooled by the Nationalist and Communist Parties' skillful,mass-organized propaganda campaign.
Even so, the Lytton Report did acknowledge that, "This is not a case in which one country
has declared war on another country without previously exhausting the opportunities for
conciliation provided in the Covenant of the League of Nations. Neither is it a simple caseof the violation of the frontier of one country by the armed forces of a neighbouring country,
because in Manchuria there are many features without an exact parallel in other parts of theworld."10 The report never accused Japan of aggression.
Zhang Jinghui's speech to the Greater East Asia Conference
The following speech by the second prime minister of Manchukuo, Zhang Jinghui, shouldmake it clear to anyone that the letter-writing campaign aimed at the Lytton Commission
was completely fraudulent. Zhang was serving as Mayor of Harbin in 1931, and on
September 27, soon after the outbreak of the Manchurian Incident, he formed the Harbin
Special Administrative District Peace Preservation Committee. Harbin declared its
independence on January 1, 1932. Zhang delivered this speech11 on November 5, 1943
while serving as Manchukuo's official representative to the Greater East Asia Conference inTokyo:129This report on the Manchurian Incident was produced by a League of Nations commission. Its official
title was the “Report of the Commission of Enquiry of the League of Nations into the Sino-Japanese
Dispute”. The chairman of the committee was Earl of Lytton from Great Britain, and its other members
included Count Aldrovandi of Italy, Lieutenant General Henri Claudel of France, Major General Frank
McCoy of the United States, and Dr. Heinrich Schnee of Germany.
10
Quoted from p. 124 of the Lytton Report.
11
The full English text of this speech is available on the website of the Society for the Dissemination ofHistorical Fact. (http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Chang-Ching-hui-address.pdf)
12Delegates from Japan, Manchukuo, the Republic of China in Nanking, the Philippines, Thailand,
Burma, and the Provisional Government of Free India attended the conference.

5

"Now I am looking back over the foundation of the country of Manchuria, ten years ago, as
the first country ever founded which is confident of being Asian in the true sense of theword. Deeply excited, I feel proud of our new country. Luckily, I too took part in thefoundation with irresistible passion. I am reminded that what was missing in Manchuria atthat time was a political system based on moral justice. That is why the public has not beenorganized toward any idealistic goal. The land was devastated and the people wererandomly and lawlessly exploited. The military clique played feudal politics and imposed
heavy, unjust taxes. In fact, such a situation was nothing but a symbol of ill-treated Asia,
which was without any freedom or creativity. It was the militaristic clique of Zhang
Xueliang that practically assumed control of the district of Manchuria, cruelly squeezing
the people. The dictator was inspired by Americans and Britons with their policy to disturb
Asia, which led him to be hostile to Japan. Japan decisively launched a counterattack until,
at last, the Zhang government broke down. As a result, it was no wonder that thirty million
people got together to give support to the new country of morality and autonomy. They
knew the new government had a doubtless and firm intention of making much of thewelfare of the people and the development of the land."Zhang Jinghui's proud declaration about Manchukuo's thirty million people joining in
unison certainly rings true when one considers the spectacular growth the new nation was
experiencing at that time. Zhang continues:"As to the achievements of the newly established country of Manchuria during the first ten
years, the entire world is paying special attention. I am taking advantage of this occasion to
explain several basic problems regarding our achievement. The first is the friendly relation
among the races. In our country of Manchuria, there are many races, including Japanese,
Manchurian, Mongolian and others, living in peace and stability. Traditionally, when morethan one race lived together, it was usual that one race controlled and exploited others. In
Manchuria, however, each of the races is able to display its own ability and play animportant part in carrying out the idealistic goals of the country... The third is thestabilization of the life of the people and the training of a strong and righteous people. No
sooner had the country been founded that the government standardized the monetarysystem, which had been complicated and thought to be difficult to deal with. As a result,prices have been stabilized and the people are able to enjoy their lives. At the same time,
we made every effort to maintain public peace and order. At the time of the foundation of
the country, the land was infested with three thousand bandits. Now there are few, if any,such people seen anywhere in the territory... Lastly, what is most important is thedevelopment of industry... Now I give some figures. The scale of national finances was, atthe time of the foundation of the country, two hundred seventy million or so yen. It has
rapidly expanded by sixteen times in ten years. It now exceeded four billion and four
hundred and fifty million. Railway mileage has been lengthened from six thousand
kilometers to twelve thousand. The number of elementary school students increased fromhalf million to two and a half million. Let me talk about production increases. The output of6

coal has grown by four times and that of pig iron by five times. It is no exaggeration to saythat we have pulled off a coup." 13
Achieving the world's highest rate of economic growth
An expansion of public finances by sixteen times in ten years is a truly remarkable feat.
One might assume that GNP was rising at almost the same rate, but actually the annual rateof GNP growth was an even more astonishing thirty percent. This was not just the fastest
economic expansion in the world at that time, it was also the fastest economic expansion
the world had ever seen. Ko Bunyu believes that, if Manchukuo had survived the war, it
would have become an even more industrialized and economically developed nation thanJapan.
Manchukuo's economic development received high praise in a book written by Dr.
Elizabeth Schumpeter, the wife of the famous economist Joseph Schumpeter.14
In addition, the five-fold rise in elementary school enrollment demonstrates that education
was becoming universally accessible to all of Manchuria's "five races". 15
Yanaihara Tadao, former Chancellor of the University of Tokyo and a specialist in colonial
policy, emphasized that all the levers of political, economic, and military power inManchukuo were held by Japanese citizens, and on that basis condemned Manchukuo as a"Japanese puppet state".
However, it was surely quite normal for a new developing nation like Manchukuo to seek
the aid of Japanese citizens with experience working in a modern country. The more
important question is whether or not the Japanese were attempting to entrench themselves
as a privileged, ruling elite. In fact, as is shown in Zhang's speech, the Japanese placed
great importance on racial harmony and adopted no discriminatory policies. Manchukuo's
dramatic expansion in school enrollment is proof of this. As the Manchukuo people’s levelof education rose due to this policy, it would have been natural for them to take over the
positions once held by Japanese citizens.
As Zhang Jinghui emphasized in his speech, "I can pride myself on the prosperity of mycountry. We owe this happiness to the chivalrous spirit with which Imperial Japan
constantly give us their support."16 He was expressing gratitude to Japan, but that does notmean that he was a puppet of Japan. His speech was delivered at the Greater East Asia
Conference, which today many Japanese academics assume to have been a gathering of
13

Address of His Excellency Chang Ching-hui, Prime Minister of the Empire of Manchuria(http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Chang-Ching-hui-address.pdf), p.3-5
14
See The Industrialization of Japan and Manchukuo by Elizabeth Boody Schumpeter.
15
The five races were the Manchus, Mongolians, Han Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese. The
fundamental policy of the government of Manchukuo was "five races under one union".
16
Ibid., (http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Chang-Ching-hui-address.pdf), p. 5.

7

"Japanese puppet states". However, journalist Henry Stokes,17 former Tokyo bureau chief
for The New York Times, responded, "The Japanese who believe that are themselves like
puppets who have sold Japan's soul to foreign powers." Stokes seems to understand thesituation quite well.
In short, the assertion that Japan conquered Manchuria does not stand up to scrutiny.
The myth of the Fifteen-Year War
The official view of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designates the war between Japanand China as a "Fifteen-Year Sino-Japanese War," beginning with the Manchurian Incident(1931) and continuing through the Marco Polo Bridge Incident (July 1937), the Battle of
Shanghai (August-November 1937), the China Incident (1937-1941), and the Greater Asian
War (1941-1945). This belief is also popular among Japanese historians, and it evenappears in Japanese history textbooks.
However, this view was concocted by the CCP, and it has no basis in historical fact. The
Manchurian Incident began on September 18, 1931, and following the fall of Qiqihar on
November 19, the occupation of Manchuria's three northeastern provinces was largely
complete. The fighting stopped with the fall of Jinzhou, in Jehol Province, on January 3 ofthe following year, and then, in March, the state of Manchukuo came into being. That was
the end of the war.
Having said that, from the perspective of the CCP, it was on April 26, 1932 that the
Chinese Soviet Republic, founded in Ruijin in Jiangxi Province, issued a "declaration ofwar" on Japan in the name of the central government. If that declaration had beenrecognized internationally as a serious act of war, then Japan would have had the right torespond by invading communist-held regions of China. In fact, it was not deemed to be
anything more than a symbolic move and was completely ignored by other countries. The
Chinese Soviet Republic was itself destroyed in October of 1934 during Chiang Kai-shek's
encirclement campaigns, but from the perspective of the communist cause, China continued
to be officially at war with Japan since the declaration was issued. And yet, in that case theconflict should have been called the Fourteen-Year War, not the Fifteen-Year War.

17

Henry Stokes was born in Great Britain and is a graduate of Oxford University. He worked, in
succession, as Tokyo bureau chief for The New York Times, the Financial Times, and the London Times.
He is the author of the book The Life and Death of Yukio Mishima, as well as works published inJapanese including "Eikokujin Kisha ga Mita Rengokoku Sensho Shikan no Kyomo” [The Lie of theAllied Powers' Victors' View of History as Seen by a British Reporter], "Gaikoku Tokuhain Kyokai
Juchin ga Hannichi Chukan no Sagi o Abaita" [A Veteran of the Foreign Correspondents' Club Exposes
the Anti-Japanese Deception of China and Korea], "Naze Amerika wa Tainichi Senso o Shikaketa No
Ka" [Why Did America Start a War with Japan?] (co-authored with Kase Hideaki), and "Rengokoku
Sensho Shikan no Tettei Hihan [Complete Rebuttal of the Allied Powers' Victors' View of History](co-authored with Fujii Genki).

8

The CCP's "anti-Japanese resistance" did involve guerrilla raids, but the fact that thedeclaration of war was actually merely a slogan is clear enough from the following
directive issued by Mao Zedong:18"The fighting between China and Japan is an excellent opportunity for expansion of ourparty. Seventy percent of the policies we have decided upon will be aimed towards
self-expansion, twenty percent towards dealing with the Nationalists, and ten percent
towards fighting Japan."In other words, the CCP saw anti-Japanese resistance as a tool to bolster its own power.
The armed confrontation which did occur between Japan and the Nationalist Governmentof China was effectively ended with the establishment of Manchukuo, and then was
officially resolved with the signing of the Tanggu Truce on May 31, 1933.19 There were nofurther armed clashes of significance until the Marco Polo Bridge Incident. Far from that, infact, direct rail traffic between Beijing and Mukden resumed immediately after the signingof the truce, and then, in 1934, a postal agreement normalized mail service, telegram
delivery, and telephone communication between China and Manchukuo. In 1935, customs
came into effect on the border of Manchukuo and China, permitting the resumption of
normal international trade. The same year, the Japanese and Chinese legations were
upgraded to the status of embassies as the culmination of the improved relations and mutual
friendship between the two countries.
All this should leave little doubt that the phrase "Fifteen-Year War," suggesting continuous
fighting between Japan and China from the time of the Manchurian Incident and onwards,
is ridiculous and in flagrant contradiction to historical fact.

18

This famous instruction was handed down by Mao Zedong in September 1937 as the Independent
Regiment of the 8th Route Army's 115th Division was going into action against the Japanese Army in
Shanxi Province. See "Dui Rikang Zhan Qijian Zhonggong Tongzhan Celue Zhi Yanjiu" [Research on
the Chinese Communist United Front during the War of Resistance against Japan] by Liangmei Mei.
19
The Tanggu Truce was a ceasefire agreement signed by Major General Okamura Yasuji, the Deputy
Chief of Staff of the Kwantung Army, and Lieutenant General Xiong Bin, the Chief of Staff of the
Republic of China Beiping Branch Military Council. According to the main terms of the agreement, theChinese Army was to withdraw west and south of a line stretching through Yanqing, Tongzhou, andLutai, and not undertake any provocative actions. In exchange, the Japanese Army was to withdraw
north of the Great Wall.

9