1 [Reason for Submitting This Report]
We submit this Extraordinary Report based on Article 24-5, paragraph (iv) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act andArticle 19, paragraph (2), item (ix)-2 of the Cabinet Office Order on Disclosure of Corporate Affairs for resolutions adopted at our
50th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 25, 2021.

2 [Report Content](1) The date on which the relevant shareholders meeting was heldJune 25, 2021
(2) The content of the relevant resolutions
Proposal No. 1: Partial Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation
Our Articles of Incorporation to be amended for the following reasons (Article 14, Article 23, Article 24,Article 34, and Article 35):
･ As a company with an audit & supervisory committee, Mitsubishi HC Capital adopts the Executive
Officer System in order to ensure quick and resolute decision making in business execution while
promoting the efficient execution of business decisions. We clarify the status of the Executive Officers
within the Articles of Incorporation and aim to further enhance the flexibility and efficiency of ourbusiness-execution apparatus.
･ The Board of Directors meeting adopts resolutions to establish who has the authority to convene the Boardof Directors meeting and who is the Chairman of the Board to achieve the flexible operation of the Boardof Directors meetings.
･ Accompanying the above, we revise relevant regulations and change the number of Articles.
Proposal No. 2: Election of 10 Directors (excluding Directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members)
Election of the following individuals as Directors: Seiji Kawabe, Takahiro Yanai, Kanji Nishiura, Kazumi
Anei, Satoshi Inoue, Haruhiko Sato, Hiroyasu Nakata, Go Watanabe, Mitsumasa Icho, and Yuri Sasaki
Proposal No. 3: Election of 1 Director who is a substitute Audit and Supervisory Committee member
We shall elect Hiroyasu Nakata as a substitute Audit & Supervisory Committee Member, in case the numberof Directors who are members of Audit & Supervisory Committee fall short of the number established by law
or by the Articles of Incorporation.
(3) The number of voting rights expressing the intention of “approval,” “disapproval” or “abstention” to vote for the resolution inquestion, the requirement necessary for approval of the resolution in question and the voting results for the resolution inquestion
Approval(number)12,243,780

Disapproval(number)
3,391

Abstention(number)
4,774

Ratio of“Approval” (%)
99.69

Results ofresolution
Approved

Seiji Kawabe

12,148,399

97,693

Takahiro Yanai

12,148,058

99,178

5,918

98.91

Approved

4,774

98.91

Approved

Kanji Nishiura

12,174,364

Kazumi Anei

12,177,551

72,826

4,774

99.12

Approved

69,689

4,774

99.15

Approved

Satoshi Inoue

12,176,788

70,452

4,774

99.14

Approved

Haruhiko Sato

12,177,570

69,670

4,774

99.15

Approved

Hiroyasu Nakata

12,227,564

19,677

4,774

99.56

Approved

Go Watanabe

10,379,506

1,867,727

4,774

84.51

Approved

Mitsumasa Icho

10,266,930

1,980,303

4,774

83.59

Approved

Yuri Sasaki

12,148,510

98,729

4,774

98.91

Approved

12,240,954

6,286

4,774

99.67

Approved

Items for Resolution
Proposal No. 1 (Note 1.)
Proposal No. 2 (Note 2.)

Proposal No. 3 (Note 2.)
Hiroyasu Nakata(Notes) 1. Requirements for passage of Proposal No. 1 are the attendance of one third or more of the shareholders who hold exercisable voting rights
and two-thirds or more of “approval” votes from such shareholders in attendance.
2. Requirements for passage of Proposal No. 2 and Proposal No. 3 are the attendance of one third or more of the shareholders who holdexercisable voting rights and a majority of “approval” votes from such shareholders in attendance.

－1 －

(4)

The reason why a certain number of voting rights of some shareholders in attendance at the shareholders meeting was not
added to the total number of voting rights
The requirements for proposal passage were fulfilled by adding up the votes exercised by the day before the shareholdersmeeting and the votes exercised by some shareholders in attendance at the shareholders meeting, both indicating approval ordisapproval. We legitimately made the resolutions in accordance with the Companies Act. Therefore we did not add thenumber of votes with which we were unable to confirm any indication of approval, disapproval or abstention exercised byshareholders in attendance at the shareholders meeting, to the total number of voting rights.

－2 －