Spotlight on
Highway Safety®

Governors Highway Safety Association
www.ghsa.org@GHSAHQ

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

Prepared for
Governors Highway
Safety Association
by Tara Casanova PowellPrincipal, Casanova Powell ConsultingMotorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATACONTENTS
2ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

3

SUMMARY

4

INTRODUCTION

82017 GHSA SURVEY

8

MOTORCYCLIST FATALITIES, 2016 AND 201710

MOTORCYCLIST CRASH TRENDS AND PATTERNS:STATE RESPONSES

13

CONTRIBUTING FACTORS

18

STATE EFFORTS TO REDUCE MOTORCYCLISTCRASHES AND FATALITIES21DISCUSSION: WHAT MORE CAN BE DONE
TO REDUCE MOTORCYCLIST FATALITIES24

CONCLUSION

25

REFERENCESACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Tara Casanova Powell conducted the analysis, researched and wrote the report.
Troy Costales, Governor’s Representative and Administrator, Oregon
Transportation Safety Division; Madison Forker, Communications Manager, GHSA;
and Amadie Hart, Hart Strategic Marketing LLC, edited the report.
Jonathan Adkins, Executive Director, GHSA, and Kara Macek, Senior Directorof Communications and Programs, GHSA, oversaw the report.
Creative by Tony Frye Design.
Published May 2018.
Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

2

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATASUMMARY
Motorcyclist fatalities in the United States are expected to have decreased by 5.6
percent in 2017 compared with 2016, a reduction of approximately 296 fatalities, basedon preliminary data submitted to the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA).
Motorcyclists continue to account for a considerable proportion of U.S. road trauma. According
to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s National Center for Statistics andAnalysis (NHTSA’s NCSA), in 2016 there were 5,286 motorcyclists killed on U.S. roadways.
This was a 5.1 percent increase from 2015. In addition, in 2016, motorcyclist fatalities
occurred 28 times more frequently than passenger vehicle fatalities in motor vehicle crashes
when accounting for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) (NCSA, 2018).
NCSA reported that 28 percent of the total motor vehicle fatalities in 2016 were alcoholimpaired driving crashes across the U.S. Alcohol-impaired driving fatalities for all vehicles
increased by 1.7 percent, from 10,320 in 2015 to 10,497 in 2016. Twenty-five percent ofmotorcycle riders involved in fatal crashes in 2016 were under the influence of alcohol. Thisis the highest percentage of alcohol-impaired drivers than any other vehicle types (Figure 5).
In addition, 37 percent of motorcycle riders who were killed in single-vehicle crashes in 2016
were alcohol-impaired (NCSA, 2017).
Since 2010, GHSA has requested preliminary motorcyclist fatality data from State Highway
Safety Offices (SHSOs) to predict motorcyclist deaths in advance of the final counts provided
by Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data. In January 2018, GHSA requested
preliminary state motorcyclist fatality data for 2017, and final counts for 2016. In addition, aseries of questions was included in this request to determine potential motorcyclist fatality
trends and explanations for these trends.
Motorcyclist fatality counts were obtained from state traffic record systems. Responses werecollected from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Responses to questions are basedon the respondent’s experience and content knowledge as a subject matter expert for thestate, not scientific analyses.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

3

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATAINTRODUCTION
There are three major classifications of motorcycles: street (including two- and three-wheeled
motorcycles), off-road and dual purpose. Motorcycles categorized as street bikes include cruisers, sportbikes, scooters, and mopeds. Each category of motorcycle allows for varying stability, performance,
rider visibility and handling. In general, motorcycles require more agility, coordination and alertness
when riding and provide less protection when involved in a crash. There is a higher risk of injury forthe motorcyclist since motorcycles lack the enclosure of a passenger vehicle. In addition, because
motorcycles are much smaller than other motor vehicles, they are often less visible to other road users.
Motorcyclists continue to account for a considerable proportion of U.S. road trauma. According to
NCSA, 5,286 motorcyclists were killed on U.S. roadways in 2016, which is a 5.1 percent increase
from 2015 (NCSA, 2018). In 2016, motorcyclist fatalities occurred 28 times more frequently thanpassenger vehicle fatalities in motor vehicle crashes when accounting for VMT (NCSA, 2017).
Motorcyclist fatalities increased steadily from 1997 through 2008. Motorcyclist fatalities increased
to an all-time high of 5,312 in 2008 before dropping to 4,469 in 2009. The number of motorcyclist
fatalities then fluctuated in the ensuing six years, before reaching 5,286 in 2016. (Figure 1). The
number of motorcyclist fatalities recorded in 2016 represents the second highest number ofmotorcyclist fatalities in the past two decades, according to FARS.
Figure 1. Motorcyclist Fatalities, 1994-2016

Source: Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS)

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

4

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

While motorcyclist fatalities consistently increased from 1997 to 2008, all motor vehicle fatalities
began trending downwards from 2005 to 2008 (Figure 2). It is difficult to determine the cause forthese changes, although several factors have been identified as influencing motorcyclist fatality rates.
These factors include weather (Hedlund, 2014) and economic stability (Hedlund, 2010), which may
affect the number of motorcycle registrations and, in turn, the number of motorcycle miles driven. The
decline in fatalities for passenger vehicles and trucks may be attributed to the implementation of safety
improvements including air bags, increased seat belt use and other passenger vehicle safety features.
Figure 2. Motorcyclist vs. All Motor Vehicle Fatalities, 1994-2016

Source: FARS

Motorcyclist fatalities as a percent of total motor vehicle fatalities also increased from 1994 to 2008,
with an 8.4 percentage point increase from 5.7 percent in 1994 to 14.1 percent in 2016 (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Motorcyclist Fatalities as a Percent of VMT, Registrations, and Total Motor Vehicle Deaths

Source: Fatalities, FARS; VMT and Registrations, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

5

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

Motorcyclist miles traveled
as a percent of total motor
vehicle miles traveled showed
a 0.3 percent increase, from
0.4 percent in 1994 to 0.7
percent in 2016 (FHWA,
2016). In 2007 motorcycle
vehicle miles traveled nearly
doubled from 12,049 (millions
of vehicle miles) to 21,396(millions of vehicle miles).
During this time all othermotor vehicle travel stayed
fairly consistent (FHWA,
2007). This may accountfor the increase in fatalities
during this time. From 2012
to 2015, there was a decline
in motorcyclist miles traveled
as a percent of total vehicle
miles traveled; in 2016 FARS
data reported a small reversalof this trend.
Motorcyclist registrations
as a percent of total vehicle
registrations showed a 1.3
percentage point increase,from 1.9 percent in 1994
to 3.2 percent in 2016. A
large jump in motorcycle
registrations took placefrom 1998 to 2011 and has
remained consistent over thelast few years.
Motorcycle deaths as apercent of the total motor
vehicle deaths were
calculated for each stateusing 2016 FARS Annual
Report File (ARF) data
(Figure 4). In 2016, state
motorcyclist deaths as apercent of total motor vehicle
deaths ranged from 7.1
percent in Alaska to 22.6
percent in Nevada.

Figure 4. Motorcyclist Deaths as a Percent of
Total Motor Vehicle Deaths by State, 2016

7.1%

AK
MS
RI
ID
MT
NE
AL
VA
ND
WV
MA
OR
GA
ME
NM
DE
NJ
KS
IN
LA
NC
OK
TX
NY
KY
MO
NH
WI
TN
MN
MI
IL
UT
AR
MD
IA
WA
CA
AZ
PA
OH
VT
CT
SC
FL
SD
HI
CO
WY
DC
NV

7.2%
7.8%
8.7%
8.9%
9.2%
9.9%
10.4%
10.6%
10.8%
10.8%
10.9%
11.1%
11.2%
11.7%
11.8%
11.8%
12.1%
12.3%
12.4%
12.8%
12.9%
13.0%
13.1%
13.3%
13.4%
14.0%
14.0%
14.1%
14.3%
14.3%
14.3%
14.6%
14.7%
14.9%
14.9%
15.1%
15.1%
15.2%
16.1%
17.6%
17.7%
17.7%
18.2%
18.5%
19.0%
20.0%
20.6%
21.4%
22.2%
22.6%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

PERCENTAGES

Source: 2016 FARS ARF

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

6

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

From 2015 to 2016, alcohol-impaired driving fatalities­­—or those fatalities where the driver was
reported to have a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 g/dL or higher—for all vehicles increased by
1.7 percent, from 10,320 to 10,497. Twenty-five percent of motorcyclists involved in fatal crashes
in 2016 were alcohol-impaired. This is the highest percentage of alcohol-impaired drivers than any
other vehicle type (Figure 5). Additionally, 37 percent of motorcyclists who were killed in singlevehicle crashes in 2016 were alcohol-impaired and 55 percent of motorcyclists killed in single-vehicle
crashes on weekend nights were alcohol-impaired (NCSA, 2018).
Figure 5. Percent of Alcohol-impaired Drivers Involved in Fatal Crashes by Vehicle Type, 2016

Source: 2016 FARS ARF

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

7

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

2017 GHSA SURVEY
Since 2010,1 GHSA has requested preliminary motorcyclist fatality data from State Highway Safety
Offices to predict motorcyclist deaths in advance of the final counts provided by FARS data. In
January 2018, GHSA requested preliminary state motorcyclist fatality data for 2017 and final counts
for 2016. In addition, a series of questions was included in this request to determine potential trends
and explanations for these trends within their state.
Responses were collected from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Motorcyclist fatality counts
were obtained from state traffic record systems. Responses to questions are based on the respondent’s
experience and content knowledge as a subject matter expert for the state, not scientific analyses.

MOTORCYCLIST FATALITIES, 2016 AND 2017
State-reported motorcyclist fatalities for 2016 and preliminary counts for the calendar year 2017
were provided by all 50 states and the District of Columbia (Table 1). The increase or decrease in
number and percent change from 2016 to 2017 were calculated for each state. Please note, the 2017
numbers are likely incomplete and subject to change.
Based on the unadjusted, preliminary 2017 data, the number of motorcyclist fatalities across thecountry decreased by 8.6 percent. Motorcyclist fatalities increased in 18 states, remained the samein two states, and decreased in 30 states and the District of Columbia in 2017. Seven states reported
increases of 20 percent or more. Fourteen states reported a decrease of 20 percent or more. The
largest increase was reported by Rhode Island with a 175 percent increase, from four in 2016 to 11
in 2017. The largest decrease was reported by the District of Columbia with a 66.7 percent decrease,from six fatalities in 2016 to two fatalities in 2017. The average change in motorcyclist fatalities for all
50 states and the District of Columbia in 2017 was +1.6 percent.
Adjustments were calculated for likely under-reporting of the 2017 yearly totals. Preliminary counts
for 2016 were not collected in 2017; therefore, the adjusted rate for the state 2017 preliminary counts
was calculated using the 2015 adjusted rate. To project the adjusted final number of motorcyclist
fatalities in 2017 (4,990), GHSA used an undercount of four percent (Retting 2016). Using thisadjusted rate, GHSA projects 2017 motorcyclist fatalities decreased by 5.6 percent from 2016.

1

2016 preliminary data was not collected for a 2017 report.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

8

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

Table 1
Motorcyclist Fatalities
by State for 2016
and 2017

State

2016

2017
(Preliminary)

Alabama114

78

Change from 2016 to 2017
#

%

-36

-31.6%

Alaska

6

6

0

0.0%

Arizona

144

165

21

14.6%

Arkansas

79

66

-13

-16.5%

California

566

406

-160

-28.3%

Colorado

125

103

-22

-17.6%

Source: State Highway
Safety Offices

Connecticut

52

51

-1

-1.9%

Delaware

15

10

-5

-33.3%*Prior to adjustment for
expected under-reporting.

District of Columbia

6

2

-4

-66.7%

Florida

574

504

-70

-12.2%

Georgia

170

126

-44

-25.9%

Hawaii

24

29

5

20.8%

Idaho

23

26

3

13.0%

Illinois

154

162

8

5.2%

Indiana

100

144

44

44.0%

Iowa

60

44

-16

-26.7%

Kansas

53

56

3

5.7%

Kentucky

113

90

-23

-20.4%Louisiana

92

95

3

3.3%

Maine

18

24

6

33.3%
0.0%

Maryland

76

76

0

Massachusetts

42

45

3

7.1%

Michigan

152

142

-10

-6.6%

Minnesota

52

53

1

1.9%

Mississippi

50

37

-13

-26.0%

Missouri

127

120

-7

-5.5%

Montana

17

22

5

29.4%

Nebraska

21

26

5

23.8%

Nevada

74

54

-20

-27.0%New Hampshire

18

15

-3

-16.7%New Jersey

69

80

11

15.9%

New Mexico

45

49

4

8.9%

New York

119

136

17

14.3%

North Carolina

152

141

-11

-7.2%

North Dakota

12

11

-1

-8.3%

Ohio

199

147

-52

-26.1%

Oklahoma

88

79

-9

-10.2%

Oregon

55

53

-2

-3.6%

Pennsylvania

191

184

-7

-3.7%

Rhode Island

4

11

7

175%

South Carolina

187

141

-46

-24.6%South Dakota

22

16

-6

-27.3%

Tennessee

145

131

-14

-9.7%

Texas

495

491

-4

-0.8%

Utah

41

39

-2

-4.9%

Vermont

11

13

2

18.2%

Virginia

80

115

35

43.8%

Washington

81

64

-17

-21.0%-10.3%

West Virginia

29

26

-3

Wisconsin

85

77

-8

-9.4%

Wyoming

24

17

-7

-29.2%

Total

5,251

4,798 *

-453

-8.6%

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

9

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATAMOTORCYCLIST CRASH TRENDS
AND PATTERNS: STATE RESPONSES
In addition to state motorcyclist fatality data, GHSA requested that states report various
trends in motorcyclist deaths. State responses included trends related to overall increases anddecreases, age, sex, crash type, and day of week.
Overall increases or decreases in motorcyclist fatalities
All states except Alaska and Maryland reported a change in motorcyclist fatalities. The
majority of the states reported declines in motorcyclist fatalities, which likely contributes to theoverall projected decline in motorcyclist fatalities for 2017.
Eighteen states reported increases in motorcyclist deaths from 2016 to 2017 (Table 1).
Trends reported by the states where increases occurred included contributing factors suchas speed and crossing the highway center line. For example, Nebraska reported crashes
where multiple fatalities occurred as a result of these factors when typically, multiple deaths
in a single motorcyclist crash are rare. Another trend reported by the states was an increase
in registered motorcycles in 2016, which may account for an increase in motorcyclists on
the roadway.
Thirty states and the District of Columbia reported declines in fatalities from 2016 to 2017.
Common trends among states that reported fewer fatalities in 2017 include a decrease in thenumber of registered riders or motorcycle VMT. For example, Tennessee reported a decrease
in VMT from 2016 to 2017, which was the first drop in that metric in nearly five years. Nevada
reported five moped deaths in 2017, which is the lowest number of moped fatalities in Nevada
since 2013. A new law that went into effect in Nevada in January 2017 requiring mopeds tobe registered may have resulted in fewer moped riders on Nevada roadways in 2017 and could
also have influenced the decline in motorcyclist deaths.
These accounts of state trends for 2016 and 2017 motorcyclist fatalities are a testament
to the year-to-year variability of motorcyclist deaths across the country, and the difficulty tocontrol for contributing factors in this regard.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

10

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

Age
Recently, there has been a shift from younger riders being overrepresented in motorcyclist fatalities toriders over the age of 40 comprising the greatest share of motorcyclist fatalities nationwide (FARS).
Several states reported increases in older driver fatalities in 2017. Sixteen states reported that most
motorcyclist crashes and fatalities in their states involve older riders.
This information is supported by the most recent national data reported by FARS. Over the last
four years, the 40-and-older age group made up the largest percentage of motorcyclist fatalities,
representing 55 percent of all riders killed in 2013 and 54 percent in 2014, 2015 and 2016. The
average age of motorcyclists killed in 2013, 2014 and 2015 was 42, rising to 43 in 2016.
Figure 6. Motorcyclist Fatalities by Age Group, 2013-2016

Source: 2013-2016 FARS ARF

Eight states reported younger drivers made up the largest percentage of motorcyclist fatalities intheir states. For example, Washington reported the largest group of fatalities continues to be males
aged 18-29 on sport bikes. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) reported an increasing
popularity of high-performance motorcycles called “super-sports.” These motorcycles are built for
racing, then modified for roadways. They are lighter than other motorcycles and have powerful enginesthat can reach speeds up to 180 miles per hour. These motorcycles are especially popular withyounger riders (IIHS, 2018).

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

11

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

Sex
Males have been consistently overrepresented in motorcyclist fatalities (FARS). All states reported thatmales represent the majority of those involved in motorcyclist fatalities. However, female rider fatalities haveincreased recently (FARS), and motorcycle riding is a growing interest among women. According to theMotorcycle Industry Council, women were reported to comprise 14 percent of owners in 2014, comparedto six percent of motorcycle owners in 1990 (IIHS, 2018). States are also reporting these increases.
For example, Connecticut reported a dramatic increase in female riders involved in fatal or serious injury
crashes, from 4.7 percent in 2014 to 19.2 percent in 2015. However, the state noted that changes ininjury crash data reporting in 2015 may be related to the higher total number of operators reported. South
Carolina also reported a slight increase in the percentage of female rider fatalities over the past few years.
Crash type
According to NCSA, in 2016 motorcycles were more frequently involved in fatal collisions with fixed objects
than other vehicle types. Most states reported the majority of fatal motorcyclist crashes were single-vehicle
crashes. Older riders may not be taking key factors into account when riding, such as the appropriate
motorcycle type for their skill level, which may impact their ability to ride safely. This, in conjunction withalcohol and/or drug consumption, may be increasing the incidence of single-vehicle crashes.
Day of week
Most states reported a large increase in motorcyclist fatalities during the weekday. This is supported
by an increasing trend in weekday motorcyclist fatalities reported by FARS over the last four years(Figure 7). Indiana reported a significant increase in weekend motorcyclist fatalities in 2017.
Figure 7. Motorcyclist Fatalities by Day of Week

Source: 2013-2016 FARS ARF

However, when comparing the number of hours between weekday and weekend, there were morethan 1.6 times as many motorcyclist fatalities on weekends (19.1 percent) compared to weekdays(11.9 percent) (FARS, 2016).

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

12

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATACONTRIBUTING FACTORS
Motorcycle riding is considered to be a higher risk than riding in other motor vehicles. There areseveral contributing factors that may influence rider risk, including weather, helmet use, impaired
riding, speed, and unendorsed or unlicensed riders.
Weather
Typically, weather plays a significant role influencing state motorcyclist fatalities. With harsher winters,
riding seasons may be shortened, resulting in fewer motorcycle riders on the roadways and therefore
fewer motorcyclist crashes and fatalities. When milder winters are reported, the reverse occurs. Idaho
and Michigan reported that a harsher winter in 2017 may have led to a delayed or reduced motorcycle
riding season. These states showed a decrease in motorcyclist fatalities. Kansas, Kentucky, New York,and Vermont reported a milder or delayed winter that expanded their riding season. These states also
showed an increase in motorcyclist fatalities.
The hurricane season for 2017 was particularly harsh, with 17 named storms, 10 hurricanes, andsix major (category three or stronger) hurricanes that tore through the Atlantic Basin, a number ofstorms well above the 30-year average for the season. This placed 2017 among the top 10 mostactive Atlantic seasons on record, according to Dr. Phil Klotzbach, tropical scientist at Colorado State
University. Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria devastated parts of Texas, Florida, and the Caribbean,affecting roadways, bridges and tunnels, and may have impacted motorcycle riding (Belles, 2017).
Helmet Use
According to NCSA, 1,859 motorcyclist lives were saved in 2016 because they were wearing helmets.
In addition, if all riders had worn helmets, an additional 802 lives would have been saved (NCSA,
2018). Motorcycle helmets have been shown to decrease the incidence and severity of traumaticbrain injury due to motorcycle crashes. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), helmets reduce the risk of head injuries from motorcycle crashes by 69 percent and deaths by
37 percent. Previous reports and speculation suggested that helmet use is associated with a higher
likelihood of cervical spine injury. A recent study found that there is a significantly lower likelihood of
suffering a cervical spine injury among helmeted motorcyclists (Page, 2018). This study found thatunhelmeted riders sustained a significantly higher number of vertebral fractures and ligamentous
injuries. The study findings confirm that helmet use does not increase the risk of developing a cervicalspine fracture and provides some protective advantage. Additionally, a study released in 2016 showedthat medical charges and rates of head, facial, and brain injuries among motorcyclists were lower instates with universal helmet laws (Olsen et al., 2016). This provides strong evidence that universal
helmet laws reduce motorcyclist injuries, the severity of motorcyclist injuries and motorcyclist fatalities.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

13

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATAState helmet laws
Currently, 19 states and the District of Columbia have universal helmet laws requiring all motorcyclists
to wear a helmet. Twenty-eight states require only some motorcyclists to wear a helmet (17 andyounger, 18 and younger, and 20 and younger). Three states (Illinois, Iowa and New Hampshire) do
not have a motorcycle helmet law (GHSA, 2018) (Figure 8).
Figure 8. State Helmet Laws, 2018

Source: Governors Highway Safety Association

The National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS), conducted by NCSA, reported that U.S.
Department of Transportation-compliant motorcycle helmet use was 65.2 percent in 2017, notstatistically different from 65.3 percent in 2016. However, helmet use continued to be notably higher
in states that require all motorcyclists to be helmeted compared to those that do not. Additionally,
helmet use among motorcyclists on expressways and in fast and heavy traffic rose significantly (NCSA
2018). Non-compliant helmet use among riders decreased to 7.7 percent in 2016 from 11.8 percent in2015, but increased to 8.6 percent in 2017 (NCSA 2017, 2018). State responses reflect these NCSA
findings. Florida, Hawaii and Utah reported increases in helmet use. Each of these states have a partial
helmet law. Hawaii requires riders 17 and younger to wear a helmet. Hawaii reported a small increasein motorcycle helmet use, from 56.5 percent in 2016 to 59.3 percent in 2017. Hawaii also reported
a large increase in moped helmet use, from 18.2 percent in 2016 to 31.4 percent in 2017. Utah also
requires riders aged 20 and younger to wear a helmet and reported a slight increase in helmet use,from 60.7 percent in 2015 to 61.0 percent in 2016. Massachusetts requires all riders to wear a helmet
Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

14

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

and reported that 85 percent of motorcyclists over the last three years were helmeted. Tennessee andWashington both have a universal helmet law. Both states reported consistent high helmet use within
their state. Tennessee reported 99.4 percent helmet use in 2016. Washington reported that typicallyhelmet use is observed at 95 percent each year.
Delaware and Nebraska reported decreases in helmet use. Delaware requires a helmet to be on the
motorcycle for riders aged 18 and younger but does not require the helmet to be worn by the rider.
The state reported that officers do not stop many motorcycles during high visibility enforcement(HVE) efforts because they can be difficult to stop, and officers do not want to pursue them for fearof endangering other drivers if a chase ensues. Delaware, like several other states, does not have a
way to track helmet use when conducting HVE efforts since there is no section on overtime sheets toindicate helmet use. Nebraska, which has a universal helmet law, reported a decrease in helmet use
from 99.7 percent in 2016 to 84.8 percent in 2017. Nebraska also reported an increase in non-DOT
compliant helmet use from 10.3 percent to 15.7 percent in the same year.
New Hampshire, one of three states without a helmet law, reported 50 percent of motorcycle riders do
not wear a helmet.
Impaired riding
Drivers or motorcycle riders are considered to be alcohol-impaired when their blood alcohol
concentrations (BACs) are 0.08 g/dL or higher. In a recent NCSA study (Lacey, 2016), alcohol was
determined the largest contributor to crash risk for all vehicle types. For drivers with a BAC of 0.08,
the relative risk of crashing is approximately four times that of drivers with no alcohol found in theirblood. Although it is commonly believed that riding skills may be more easily impacted by alcohol thanare driving skills, relatively little is known about the effects of alcohol on motorcycle operation. A study
conducted in 2007 (Voas et al., 2007) found that several relative-risk methods regarding alcohol
impairment developed for passenger cars can be adapted to motorcycle studies, however, more
research is needed to identify the risk of rider BAC levels in relation to crash involvement. In addition,
a 2007 NCSA study measured rider performance under different BACs on a closed course. Resultsof this study showed BAC levels as low as 0.05 significantly impaired riders’ reaction times and thelikelihood of lane departure, compared with zero BAC (Creaser et al., 2007).
As previously mentioned, motorcycle riders involved in fatal crashes in 2016 represented the highest
percentage of impaired driving fatalities among all vehicle types. According to NCSA, motorcycle
riders killed in traffic crashes at night were alcohol-impaired three times more frequently than thosekilled during the day in 2016 (NCSA, 2018). These 2016 NCSA findings were reflected in the state
responses. Indiana, Maryland and Mississippi reported an increase in fatal crashes during the evening
or at night. Kentucky reported that one-third of motorcycle crashes involved alcohol impairment. New
Hampshire reported that 39 percent of motorcyclist fatalities in 2016 involved alcohol or drugs. This
percentage increased to 40 percent in 2017. New York reported that 27 percent of fatal motorcyclist
crashes from 2008-2012 were alcohol-related. Oregon reported that there is a general perception
by the riding population that impaired driving laws are not actively enforced. For this reason, riders
have little concern for compliance due to low expectation of enforcement. West Virginia reported anincrease not only in alcohol but also with drug use among motorcycle riders.
The following chart shows the percentage of motorcycle riders killed with BACs above 0.00 g/dL
over the last four years, demonstrating a shift from low BAC levels (0.01 to 0.07 BAC) to higher BAC
levels (at or above 0.08) (Figure 9). This could reflect an increasing trend in the amount of alcohol

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

15

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

one consumes when drinking. In 2017, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism(NIAAA) released a study that showed nearly 32 million adults in the US, representing 13 percentof the population age 18 and older, consumed more than two times the number of drinks consideredbinge drinking on at least one occasion (Gowin, 2017). NIAAA defines binge drinking as a pattern ofdrinking that brings BAC levels to 0.08 g/dL, which translates to approximately four drinks for womenand five drinks for men in about two hours.
Figure 9. Percent of Riders with BACs Above 0.00 g/dL in Fatal Crashes, 2013-2016

Source: 2013-2016 FARS ARF

With the recent legalization of recreational marijuana, there may be a higher number of drivers
or motorcyclists that are driving or riding drug-impaired. A 2017 report released by the InsuranceInstitute for Highway Safety (IIHS) showed that marijuana is showing up more frequently amongpeople involved in crashes. This study reported that after legalizing recreational marijuana use,
collision claim frequencies in Colorado, Oregon, and Washington are approximately three percent
higher overall than would have been expected without legalization (IIHS, 2017). A well-known 2010
study conducted in the European Union (EU) known as the Driving Under the Influence of Drugs,
Alcohol and Medicines (DRUID) study, found that drivers positive for delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinal(THC) were estimated to be at elevated crash risk, one to three times that of drivers not positive for
THC. A recent NCSA crash risk study found that THC is associated with a significantly elevated riskof crashing, approximately 25 percent (NCSA, 2015); however, these calculations did not account forother factors that may contribute to increased crash risk.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

16

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATAIn recent years, more drivers admit to using marijuana. Results of the 2013–2014 National Roadside
Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers found that 12.6 percent of weekend nighttime drivers
tested positive for THC. This is a 48 percent increase from the 2007 National Roadside Survey
results (NCSA, 2015). Marijuana impairs psychomotor skills and cognitive functions associated withdriving, including vigilance, time and distance perception, lane tracking, motor coordination, attention
to tasks and reaction time (Hedlund, 2017). GHSA, with funding from the Foundation for Advancing
Alcohol Responsibility (Responsibility.org), released Drug-Impaired Driving: A Guide for What States
Can Do. This report stated that in 2015, 57 percent of all fatally-injured drivers were tested for drugs(Hedlund, 2017). Of those tested, 35.6 percent tested postitive for marijuana, 9.3 percent tested
positive for Amphetamines, and 55 percent tested positive for other drugs. Increased research on
this topic, as well as enforcement and education for all drivers and riders, is essential to reducing
motorcyclist drug-impaired driving fatalities on U.S. roadways.
Speed
Fatal single-vehicle crashes are typically related to speed and/or distractions (Liu, 2009). Higher
speeds are a significant factor in determining injury severity. Motorcycles, especially those thatare built with high performance features, are capable of reaching extremely high speeds. These
motorcycles are capable of higher acceleration and quicker stops than other motor vehicles. NCSA
reported that 33 percent of all motorcycle riders involved in fatal crashes in 2016 were speeding,compared to 19 percent for passenger vehicles (NCSA, 2018).
State responses mirrored these numbers. Five states—Alabama, Delaware, Indiana, Maine andVirginia—reported speed as a primary factor in motorcyclist fatalities. States also reported thatyounger age groups are typically overrepresented in speed-related crashes. For example, Kansas
reported younger male fatalities commonly involve sport or high-performance motorcycles, while older
male fatalities involve larger touring motorcycles. Massachusetts reported speed was a factor in 37
percent of all motorcyclist fatalities, and in 70 percent of motorcyclist fatalities involving a rider underage 30. Virginia reported speed-related motorcyclist fatalities increased 56 percent in 2017.
Unendorsed riders
Unendorsed or unlicensed riders are typically those riders without formal education and training.
According to NCSA, 27 percent of motorcycle riders involved in fatal crashes in 2016 were riding
without valid motorcycle licenses at the time of the collisions, while only 13 percent of passenger
vehicle drivers in fatal crashes did not have valid licenses (NCSA, 2018). Idaho, Indiana, Nebraska,
Rhode Island, Ohio, and South Carolina reported that unlicensed riders are a problem in their state. In
some states, certain gaps need to be addressed regarding motorcycle permit laws. For example, one
state reported riders can renew a riding permit and never test for the endorsement. This perpetuates
permit-only riding and avoids the formal licensing requirements.
Other Reported Factors
Other reported factors contributing to motorcyclist fatalities included rider inexperience; operator
error, including failure to yield; aggressive driving; distracted riding; and “being run off the road” by
distracted motor vehicle drivers. Rider inexperience is similar to passenger motor vehicle novice
driving. Practice and training are critical when developing the skills needed to become proficientat riding a motorcycle (NCSA, 2005). Alaska reported that typically one or two riders with limited
experience per year are killed, for example, military members recently stationed in Alaska who crashduring their first riding season.
Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

17

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

Distracted riding appears to be an increasing issue on U.S. roadways. For instance, Virginia reported
a significant increase (113 percent) in distracted riding fatalities for 2017. Nebraska and New
Hampshire reported the occurrence of increased center lane encroachment fatalities, which may be
due to distraction. Tennessee also reported a steady increase of motorcyclist crashes that included
some type of distraction since 2013.
Other factors that may influence increased motorcyclist fatalities include motorcycle events where large
numbers of riders gather for recreational purposes. South Dakota reported that the month of August,when the Sturgis motorcycle rally takes place, is always the month with the largest number of fatalities.
However, these fatalities occur when riders are traveling to or from the event, not during the rally.

STATE EFFORTS TO REDUCE MOTORCYCLIST CRASHESAND FATALITIESStates are currently addressing motorcyclist safety issues through the following efforts:●● increasing helmet use;●● promoting education, training and motorcycle safety programs;●● participating in motorcycle safety advisory committees; and●● collecting data to inform motorcycle safety countermeasures.

Increasing Helmet Use
Several states have been unsuccessful in their attempts to propose universal helmet laws due tobelief by riders that that this type of law is an infringement of their right to choose whether or notthey want to wear a helmet. This is an ongoing struggle between rider rights groups and motorcycle
safety advocates. Continued efforts to pass helmet and other motorcycle laws are underway inseveral states.
Promoting education, training and motorcycle safety programs
Most states sponsor motorcycle safety training classes and scholarships along with public awarenesscampaigns. Public awareness campaigns include the use of highway billboards, variable message
signs (VMS), radio ads, lawn signs, and public appearances at local and state fairs. Many of thesepublic awareness campaigns take place prior to and during the riding season. For example, Indianasponsors “The Miracle Ride,” a large motorcycle charity event each year with motorcycle traffic safety
messages. Louisiana intends to sponsor a motorcycle awareness campaign in 2018, which will
facilitate a motorcycle awareness and safety rally in partnership with the Louisiana State Police.
State motorcycle programs focus on risk mitigation regarding key motorcycle riding issues such as
speed, impaired riding, distracted riding and reducing invalid licensure. In addition, most states participate
in the promotion of intermediate and advanced education and training. This includes increased
availability of motorcycle safety classes as well as promotion and marketing strategies to licensed riders

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

18

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

to take “follow-on” or subsequent training after obtaining their motorcycle license to improve their riding
skills. Additional training beyond what is required for licensing has been shown to increase key skills to
be a safe rider. A NCSA study conducted in 2013 measuring the effect of sight distance training on thevisual scanning of motorcycle riders indicated that there may be a relationship between rider experience,
rider training and feedback, and visual behavior while riding a motorcycle. For example, on a curved
section of the open road course, beginner or untrained riders did not look far ahead enough to stopsafely twice as often as more experienced riders (NCSA, 2013).
Several states participate in national traffic safety campaigns that include elements of motorcyclist
safety. Six states currently participate in the “Just Drive” campaign to educate riders and motorists
about the dangers of distracted driving. Alaska, Florida, Kentucky, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
and Tennessee reported participating in the “Share the Road” program, which conducts a very
focused and limited media campaign at the beginning of the motorcycle season to encourage bothmotorcyclists and the general motoring public to be on the lookout for each other. Kentucky andWashington reported participating in their state “Vision Zero” program.
In addition to these state initiatives, some states are implementing additional strategies working with
their local military and law enforcement to reduce motorcyclist fatalities. For example, the Alaska
Highway Safety Office works with the two major military installations in the state to provide annual
motorcycle crash data for their motorcycle education program. North Carolina has implemented a“BikeSafe” Program, which is a rider training program conducted by law enforcement officers in a nonthreatening, non-enforcement environment.
Some states are enacting legislative changes and conducting local research to encourage safe riding.
The Michigan Legislature recently passed a law increasing motorcycle registration and endorsement
fees to fund a separate state safety and education awareness fund, which will be dedicated tocreating and maintaining a program that promotes motorcyclist awareness, safety and education.
Michigan also implemented an Impaired Motorcyclist Prevention campaign in 2017 that included
phone surveys and focus groups to inform local media campaigns. New York State passed a law in2017 requiring motorcycle safety and awareness to be a mandatory component of the pre-licensing
course and testing for new drivers.
Participating in advisory committees
States reported that advisory committees are helpful regarding the development and implementationof motorcyclist safety initiatives. These committees often include members of law enforcement,
SHSOs, advocacy groups, education and training personnel, healthcare representatives and otherstakeholders, representing the differing views and opinions that exist within the local community.
Therefore, strategies developed by these committees are often more palatable for the communities
when implemented.
Several states reported participating in motorcycle safety advisory committees or workgroups.
These committees generally assess current issues regarding motorcyclist safety and recommend
potential countermeasures. States that reported participating in motorcycle advisory committees
include Delaware, Florida, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina
and Wisconsin. Some committees are mandated by the state legislature. For example, Delaware
participates in the Motorcycle Riders Education Advisory Committee. This committee is the resultof a legislative resolution and comprises members of the legislature, state agencies and the public.
The committee monitors the Motorcycle Rider Education Program, assesses the future needs of the

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

19

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

program, and provides recommendations. Florida created the Florida Motorcycle Safety Coalition(a.k.a. Ride Smart Florida), which is the communication and outreach extension of the Florida
Motorcycle Safety Program and serves to help implement the state’s Motorcycle Safety Strategic plan
(MSSP) goals and strategies.
Collecting data to inform motorcycle countermeasures
To establish more efficient and effective motorcycle safety program countermeasures, states are
relying on motorcycle data to inform outreach and enforcement campaigns and mobilizations.
For example, Florida rigorously collects and analyzes various sources of information relevant tomotorcyclist safety to develop strategies to reduce motorcycle crashes. Kentucky uses data gatheredby an epidemiologist to construct maps identifying counties with high numbers of motorcycle crashes
to inform media outreach efforts. Minnesota maintains a running narrative of preliminary information
on motorcycle crash fatalities, which is shared with the media, rider groups, instructors, members of
the state motorcycle safety advisory taskforce, and Toward Zero Deaths partners. Virginia has robust
motorcyclist crash data from their Traffic Records Electronic Data System (TREDS), which is used to
inform their motorcycle safety campaigns.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

20

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATADISCUSSION: WHAT MORE CAN BE DONE
TO REDUCE MOTORCYCLIST FATALITIES
Several factors may have influenced the projected 5.6 percent decline in motorcyclist fatalities during
2017, including decreases in registration and the reduction of riding seasons due to weather. Althoughthese preliminary counts show a decrease in fatalities, it is evident that sustained efforts are needed
to continue the downward trend toward zero deaths on our roadways. As previously mentioned, manystates have developed programs or strategies to reduce motorcycle deaths and injuries on U.S.
roadways; however, most states reported that much more needs to be done.
Increasing helmet use through the adoption of universal helmet laws
States that currently do not have a mandatory helmet law reported that mandatory universal helmet
laws would likely decrease motorcyclist crashes and fatalities. Mandating helmet use, skills testing andtraining for all motorcycle riders were considered the greatest needs and the most important factors
influencing the number of motorcyclist injuries and fatalities. However, states often face opposition
to universal helmet laws from riders who believe these laws infringe on their rights. This provides asignificant obstacle to reducing motorcyclist deaths. Florida reported the need for better research on
motorcyclist safety issues to inform strategies to overcome legislative obstacles. Washington reported
the need for messaging focused on true crash causation factors as delineated in evidence-based
research. Some states suggested increased penalties in the form of withholding funds for states
without a universal helmet law, since penalties are currently in place for state noncompliance acrossother highway safety program areas.
Support for motorcycle safety features
Continued support from SHSOs for motorcycle safety features encourages the purchase of
motorcycles equipped with critical and often life-saving components. One of the most impactful
motorcycle safety features is an antilock braking system (ABS) (IIHS, 2018). An ABS reduces therisk of a motorcycle crash through preventing a rider’s wheels from locking up, which often results
in a serious fall. The rate of fatal crashes is 31 percent lower for motorcycles equipped with antilock
brakes than for the same models without them (Teoh, 2013). The Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI)
reports that collision insurance claims for motorcycles with ABS are filed 20 percent less frequently
than for motorcycles without ABS, and 31 percent when the ABS bikes have combined controls (IIHS,
2018).
Increased education, awareness and training
Certain types of motorcycles can be riskier than others depending on skill level and the physicalityof the rider. Education and awareness of the differences between various types of motorcycles andthe appropriate skill level required for these different motorcycles is important when purchasing a
motorcycle, especially for new or returning riders. Supersport motorcycles have driver death rates
about four times as high as that of cruisers and standards (IIHS 2018). These bikes are built on racing
platforms, and their combination of light weight and high-horsepower engines allows for extremely
high speeds. Touring and sport-touring bikes have similar rates as cruisers and standards. The needfor increased training and education in this regard was a common response from states. Vermont
reported that with the increased popularity of three-wheeled motorcycles, there is also need forspecific education and training for these vehicles.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

21

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

Most states reported that current education, public information and focused enforcement efforts
combined with media messaging were insufficient for their needs. Increasing awareness campaigns
with focused messaging to “look out for bikes” during known riding seasons was suggested. However,states noted that the cost of paid media makes it difficult for SHSOs to fund motorcyclist safety
initiatives. For this reason, earned media is typically the only marketing strategy used to promotecurrent motorcycle programs. It was also noted, especially by those states in the Northeast, that withcurrent unpredictable weather and the riding season expanding, awareness messaging should be
year-round. Several states reported an expanding motorcycle riding season because of mild winters.
Current funding for motorcycle projects would not support expanding these programs to accountfor the increased riding season. Increased funds expanding motorcycle countermeasure efforts toaccommodate the lengthened riding season would allow for addressing these concerns. Pennsylvania
suggested that early education efforts including motorcycle awareness in new driver training classes
and other school curricula may increase overall motorcycle awareness.
Reducing impaired-riding fatalities
Most states reported the need for focused efforts on reducing impaired-riding fatalities. Ignitioninterlocks have proven successful tools when used to separate drinking events from driving forpassenger vehicles. A new study conducted by IIHS found that that state laws requiring ignitioninterlock use for all offenders reduced drunk driving crash fatalities by 16 percent (IIHS, 2018).
A recent NCSA study examined the feasibility of ignition interlock use for motorcycles. This study
looked at various key issues regarding motorcycle interlocks, including the current availability, securestorage, weather, vibration, battery power, retesting issues, liability, installation, circumvention potential
and cost. This study found that adequate and safe motorcycle interlock programs are possible withexisting equipment (NCSA, 2017).
Availability of motorcycle interlocks has increased since NCSA’s study was published. Nine states—
California, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, South Carolina andVirginia—currently mandate interlocks for motorcycles under specific circumstances. The biggest
concerns for this implementation are safety of the rider and liability issues; these concerns can beaddressed through modification of current state interlock statutes. Current interlock laws are basedon passenger vehicles; the state rules and regulations do not currently modify for motorcycles.
Therefore, what is required for passenger vehicles is required for the motorcycle. To accommodate for
this, manufacturers are modifying motorcycle devices to comply with these state regulations. However,states may need to consider accommodations for the interlocked motorcycle, such as examining
the safety of rolling retests for motorcycles to implement motorcycle interlock programs as a viablecountermeasure to reduce motorcyclists’ impaired-riding crashes.
Reducing registration/endorsement non-compliance
NCSA reported that motorcycles represented three percent of all registered vehicles in the U.S. in2016 and accounted for only 0.6 percent of all VMT, yet when taking these factors into account,motorcyclists had the highest fatality rate among all motor vehicle operators. Idaho, Indiana, Nebraska,
Rhode Island, Ohio and South Carolina reported that required endorsement for riders and increased
enforcement efforts are necessary to reduce the occurrence of poorly-trained or untrained riders. In
July 2007, Washington expanded its vehicle impoundment law to include motorcycle riders. A NCSA
study conducted to determine the effectiveness of this law change was somewhat inconclusive(NCSA, 2013), showing that while few motorcycles were impounded, motorcycle endorsements
still increased. The reason for this increase is unclear. There was also a lower proportion of crashes

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

22

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

involving unendorsed riders after the law’s implementation, but no change in overall crashes. One
interpretation is that the law worked, but this does not account for the lack of endorsements. Anotherinterpretation of the results is that the law discouraged unendorsed riders from riding, thus limiting
their exposure. It was noted that this law was implemented soon before the national economic
recession, which may have affected the results of the study. This matter requires further research.
Graduated licensing for motorcycles
Motorcycle safety advocates have proposed implementing programs for motorcycle riders similar
to state graduated driver licensing (GDL) programs for novice drivers. The University of Adelaide inAustralia recently published a study providing recommendations for a graduated licensing system for
motorcyclists in South Australia, basing this system on their current young driver program (Baldock,2018). This recommendation provides several recommended restrictions, including zero BAC, nopassengers, no phone use while riding, testing on the same type of motorcycle that the motorcyclist
will be riding and a lower point threshold than applies to a full license.
Other considerations
Lane sharing/splitting
States reported that due to increased demand from riders, at least 14 states are under pressure toadopt lane sharing/splitting laws. Currently, California is the only state to legally allow lane sharing/
splitting. Those in support of lane sharing/splitting argue that this will reduce congestion and is asafer maneuver for motorcycles when avoiding rear-end crashes caused by distracted drivers in stopand-go traffic (Bergal, 2018). Supporters for this behavior refer to a study conducted in 2015 by the
University of California Berkeley that found this behavior to be relatively safe at lower speeds. Several
states have attempted to pass these laws, including Arizona, Massachusetts and Washington. Those
opposed to legalize lane sharing/splitting argue that it is a risky behavior that can be unsafe andwould not reduce motorcyclist fatalities or serious injuries. GHSA has not taken a formal position on
legalizing lane-splitting.
Automated vehicles
Automated features are becoming common in today’s motor vehicles. The driving population is looking
to automated vehicles to solve highway safety issues on our roadways; however, full automation has
not been perfected and misguided public reliance on these features can be dangerous. There areblurred aspects of autonomous vehicle accountability when involved in a crash, particularly the liability
and legal aspects when crashes occur. Recently, a motorcyclist in California filed lawsuit against
General Motors claiming that one of the manufacturer’s automated vehicles was guilty of “negligent
driving” when it aborted a lane change and struck the rider (Holley, 2018). The rider was injured
and unable to work because of this crash. The police report for this crash cited the rider as beingat fault, claiming the rider started to pass the vehicle before it was safe to do so. This is one of thefirst lawsuits involving autonomous vehicles. While this matter requires further research, automatedvehicles do have strong potential to increase motorcyclist safety. As lane departure, blind spot, andforward vehicle detection sensor technology in passenger vehicles improve, these features could playa significant role in motorcycle crash avoidance.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

23

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATACONCLUSION
Motorcycle riding can be riskier than driving in a passenger vehicle since motorcyclists are directly
exposed to other vehicles in the event of a crash. For this reason, states are focused on promoting
motorcyclist safety and reducing motorcyclist crashes, serious injuries and fatalities. It is evident
that states are working hard to promote motorcyclist safety and training, increase enforcement andawareness and educate the public in an effort to reduce motorcyclist deaths. Motorcyclist fatalities
in the United States are expected to have decreased by 5.6 percent in 2017 compared with 2016, a
reduction of approximately 296 fatalities, based on preliminary data submitted to GHSA. However,according to FARS data, motorcyclist fatality numbers have fluctuated over the past 10 years, showing
several increases and decreases absent of sustained trends. The projected decline in fatalities in2017 may not be an ongoing trend in this direction. Identifying effective and efficient motorcyclist
safety programs is a priority for states, and efforts to increase the effectiveness of these campaigns
should be maintained.
All states reported the importance of implementing universal helmet laws. It was noted that thiswould likely decrease motorcyclist injuries and fatalities. However, continued opposition in this regard
can hinder progress in this direction. Efforts to mandate helmet use, skills testing and training for all
motorcycle riders are considered the greatest needs and the most important factors influencing thedecrease in the number of motorcyclist injuries and fatalities.
States are constantly evolving not only their programs, but also how they implement these strategies.
Most states reported that funding for education, public information and focused enforcement efforts
combined with media messaging were insufficient to meet their current needs. Impaired driving anddriver distraction are ever-increasing issues on our roadways and are significant contributing factors
in motorcyclist fatalities. Identifying viable solutions to overcome these issues is a priority. While
there are factors that cannot be controlled to impact motorcycle crash rates, such as weather andeconomic stability, states are looking at the data to inform countermeasures for these factors. With
more advanced technology and reliable, available data, some states are using crash information to
inform mobilization campaigns and enforcement efforts. Increasing the reliability and accessibility ofstate data will allow the informed research needed to develop more effective and efficient motorcyclist
safety programs.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

24

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATAREFERENCES
Baldock, M.R.J. (2018). Recommendations for a
Graduated Licensing System for Motorcycles in South
Australia. Centre for Automotive Safety Research.

Hedlund, J. (2010). Motorcyclist traffic fatalities by state;2009 preliminary data. Washington, D.C.: Governors
Highway Safety Association.

Belles, J. (2017). Atlantic Hurricane Season Recap: 17
Moments We’ll Never Forget. weather.com.

Hedlund, J. (2014). Motorcyclist traffic fatalities by state;2013 preliminary data. Washington, D.C.: Governors
Highway Safety Association.

Bergal, J. (2018). Motorcycle Lane-Splitting: Safe or
Scary? Stateline, Washington, D.C.: Pew Charitable
Trusts.
Berning, A., Compton, R., and Wochinger, K. (2015).
Results of the 2013–2014 National Roadside Survey of
Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers. (Traffic Safety Facts
Research Note. Report No. DOT HS 812 118). Washington,
D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Blincoe, L. J., Miller, T.R., Zaloshnja, E., & Lawrence, B.
A. (2015). The economic and societal impact of motor
vehicle crashes. 2010 (Revised). (Report No. DOT HS
812 013). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Safety
Administration.

Hedlund, J. (2017). Drug Impaired Driving: A Guide forStates. Washington, D.C.: Governors Highway Safety
Association.
Holley, P. (2018). After crash, injured motorcyclist
accuses robot-driven of “negligent driving”. Washington
Post.
Procedures for Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device
Conditioned RDP Illinois Legislative Code. Retrieved
March 2018.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2018). Motorcycle
Overview. Arlington, VA. Retrieved March 2018.

Sentencing for Driving While Under the Influence.
California Legislative Code. Retrieved March 2018.

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2018). Motorcycle
Helmet Use. Arlington, VA. Retrieved March 2018.

Creaser, J.I.; Ward, N.J.; Rakauskas, M.E.; Boer, E.;
Shankwitz, C.; and Nardi, F. (2007). Effects of alcoholon motorcycle riding skills. (Report No. DOT HS 810
877). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2018). State laws
mandating interlocks for all DUI offenders save lives.
Arlington, VA. Retrieved March 2018.

Derrick, A.J., Faucher, L.D. (2009). Motorcycle helmets
and rider safety: A legislative crisis. J. Public Health Pol.
2009; 30(2):226–242. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2009.11.
Federal Highway Administration. (2017). Highway
Statistics 2016: State Motor Vehicle Registrations 2016.
Retrieved March 2018.
Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices. Florida
Administrative Rule. Retrieved March 2018.
Governors Highway Safety Association. (2018). State
Motorcycle Helmet Laws. Retrieved March 2018.
Gowin, J.L., Sloan, M.E., Stangl, B.L., Vatsalya, V.,
Ramchandani, V.A. (2017). Vulnerability for Alcohol
Use Disorder and Rate of Alcohol Consumption. Am J
Psychiatry. 1;17 4 (11): 1094-1101. doi: 10.1176/ appi.
ajp.2017.16101180.

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2017). Legalizing
recreational marijuana is linked to increased crashes.
Arlington, VA. Retrieved April 2018.
Ignition interlock devices and licenses. Kentucky
Legislative Code. Retrieved March 2018.
Lacey, J.H., Kelley-Baker, T., Berning, A., Romano, E.,
Ramirez, A., Yao, J., Moore, C., Brainard, K., Carr, K., Pell,K., and Compton, R. (2016). Drug and Alcohol Crash
Risk: A Case-Control Study. (Report No. DOT HS 812
355). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
Liu, C., and Subramanian, R. (2009). Factors Related to
Fatal Single-Vehicle Run-Off-Road Crashes. (Report No.
DOT HS 811 232). Washington, D.C.: National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration.
Liu, B.C., Ivers, R., Norton, R., Boufous, S., Blows, S., Lo,
S.K. (2008). Helmets for preventing injury in motorcycle
riders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.;(1):CD004333. doi:
10.1002/14651858.CD004333.pub3.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

25

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATAMarques, P. R., & McKnight, A. S. (2017). Examinationof the feasibility of alcohol interlocks for motorcycles.
(Report No DOT HS 812 423). Washington, D.C.: National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Certification, installation, use and maintenance ofignition interlock devices. Massachusetts Government
Regulations. Retrieved March 2018.
McCartt, A.T., Blaner, L., Teoh, E., Strouse, L. (2011).
Overview of motorcycling in the United States: a national
survey. Journal of Safety Research, 42, 177-84.
Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act: Definitions; M to
W. Michigan Legislative Code. Retrieved March 2018.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2018).
Motorcycle Helmet Use in 2017—Overall Results. (Traffic
Safety Facts, Report No. DOT HS 812 512). Washington,
D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2018).
Motorcycles: 2016 data. (Updated, Traffic Safety Facts.
Report No. DOT HS 812 492). Washington, D.C.: National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2017).
Motorcycles: 2015 data: Updated. (Traffic Safety Facts.
Report No. DOT HS 812 353). Washington, D.C.: National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2017).
Summary of motor vehicle crashes (Final edition):2015 data. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 12376). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2017).
2016 Motor Vehicle Crashes. Overview. (Traffic Safety
Facts Research Note. Report No. DOT HS 812 456).
Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2016).
Motorcycles: 2014 data. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No.
DOT HS 812 292). Washington, D.C.: National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2016).
Summary of motor vehicle crashes (Final): 2014 data.
(Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 263).
Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.

National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2015).
Estimating lives and costs saved by motorcycle helmets
with updated economic cost information. (Traffic Safety
Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 206). Washington, D.C.:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2015). 2013
Motor Vehicle Crashes. Overview. (Traffic Safety Facts.
Report No. DOT HS 812 169). Washington D.C.: National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2015).
Motorcycles: 2013 data. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No.
DOT HS 812 148). Washington, D.C.: National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2015). Resultsof the 2013-2014 National Roadside Survey of Alcoholand Drug Use by Drivers. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No.
DOT HS 812 118). Washington, D.C.: National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2015). Drug
and Alcohol Crash Risk. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No.
DOT HS 812 117). Washington, D.C.: National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2013). The
Effect of Sight Distance Training on the Visual Scanningof Motorcycle Riders: A Preliminary Look. (Traffic Safety
Facts. Report No. DOT HS 811 690). Washington, D.C.:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
National Highway Safety Administration. (2016) Fatality
Analysis Reporting System 2016: Motorcyclist Fatality
Data 2016. Retrieved March 2018.
National Highway Traffic Administration. (2005).
Promising Practices in Motorcycle Rider Education andLicensing. (Report No. DOT HS 809 922). Washington,
D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Page, P.S, Wei, Z., and Brooks, N.P. (2018). Motorcycle
helmets and cervical spine injuries: a 5-year experienceat a Level 1 trauma center. Journal of Neurosurgery andSpine. 2018 Mar 6:1-5. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE17540.
Retting, R. (2016). Motorcyclist traffic fatalities by state;2015 preliminary data. Washington, D.C.: Governors
Highway Safety Association.
Teoh, E., Campbell, M. (2010). Role of motorcycle type infatal motorcycle crashes. Journal of Safety Research, 41,507-512.2017.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

26

Motorcyclist
Traffic Fatalities
by State2017 PRELIMINARY DATA

Ignition Interlock Device Specifications. Virginia
Administrative Code. Retrieved March 2018.
Ignition Interlock Device Installations. Virginia
Administrative Code. Retrieved March 2018.
Williams, A. (2015). Motorcyclist traffic fatalities by state;2014 preliminary data. Washington, D.C.: Governors
Highway Safety Association.
Voas, R.B., Smith, T.A, Thom, D.R., McKnight, A. J., Zellner,
J.W., Hurt, H.H. (2007). Methodology forDetermining
Motorcycle Operator Crash Risk and Alcohol Impairment:
Vol. 2 Literature Review Report.(Report No. DOT HS 810
762). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.

Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001

27