1 [Reason for Submitting This Report]
We are submitting this Extraordinary Report based on Article 24-5, paragraph (iv) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Actand Article 19, paragraph (2), item (ix)-2 of the Cabinet Office Order on Disclosure of Corporate Affairs, in regard to resolutions
adopted at our 52nd Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 27, 2023.

2 [Report Contents](1) The date on which the relevant shareholders meeting was held
June 27, 2023
(2) The contents of the relevant resolutions
Proposal No. 1: Election of 8 (Eight) Directors (Excluding Directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee Members)
Election of the following individuals as Directors: Takahiro Yanai, Taiju Hisai, Kanji Nishiura, Kazumi
Anei, Haruhiko Sato, Hiroyasu Nakata, Yuri Sasaki, and Takuya Kuga.
Proposal No. 2:

Determination of the Amount and Other Details of the Compensation Based on the Performance-Based
Stock Compensation Plan for Directors, etc. (Excluding Non-executive Directors and Non-residents inJapan) Excluding Directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee Members
The current stock-based compensation stock option shall be abolished, and a performance-based stockcompensation plan shall be adopted as a compensation plan for the Directors, etc. (excluding Non-executive
Directors and Non-residents in Japan) excluding Directors who are Audit and Supervisory CommitteeMembers.
Up to the amount obtained by multiplying 800 million yen by the number of fiscal years subject to themedium-term management plan will be contributed to the trust, which will be established covering thosefiscal years, and through the trust, shares of the Company will be delivered, etc. up to the number obtainedby multiplying 1,550 thousand shares by the number of those fiscal years.

(3) The number of voting rights expressing “approval,” “disapproval,” or “abstention” in voting for the resolution in question, therequirements necessary for approval of the resolutions in question, and the voting results for the resolutions in question
Approval
Disapproval
Abstention
Ratio ofResults ofItems for Resolution(number)(number)(number)“Approval” (%)
Resolution
Proposal No. 1 (Note 1)
Takahiro Yanai
Taiju Hisai
Kanji Nishiura
Kazumi Anei
Haruhiko Sato
Hiroyasu Nakata
Yuri Sasaki
Takuya Kuga

11,961,441
11,916,392
11,994,658
12,018,016
12,017,076
12,135,986
12,158,091
10,012,636
12,151,011

164,262
209,310131,051
107,693
108,633
45,56523,4602,113,064
27,45255,87555,87555,87555,87555,87534
34
55,875
4,869

97.64
97.27
97.91
98.10
98.09
99.06
99.24
81.73
99.19

Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved

Proposal No. 2 (Note 2)
Approved(Notes) 1.
Requirements for passage of Proposal No. 1 are the attendance of one-third or more of the shareholders who holdexercisable voting rights and a majority of “approval” votes from such shareholders in attendance.
2.
Requirement for passage of Proposal No. 2 is a majority of “approval” votes from such shareholders in attendance.
(4) The reason why a certain number of voting rights of some shareholders in attendance at the shareholders meeting was not
added to the total number of voting rights
The requirements for proposal passage were fulfilled by adding the votes exercised by the day before the shareholders
meeting and the votes exercised by some shareholders in attendance at the shareholders meeting, both indicating approval ordisapproval. We legitimately have made the resolutions in accordance with the Companies Act. Therefore, we did not add tothe total number of voting rights the number of votes for which we were unable to confirm any indication of approval,
disapproval, or abstention exercised by shareholders in attendance at the shareholders meeting.

－ 1 －