149TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSEPARTICIPANTS’PAPERSVISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS

SECURING PROTECTION AND COOPERATION OF WITNESSESAND WHISTLEBLOWERS: PART II
Severino H. Gaña, Jr.*I. BACKGROUND
The Philippine government recognizes that graft and corruption are threats to the sustained growthand development of the country. It admits that initiatives against graft and corruption, which include
administrative measures and legislative actions to enhance transparency and effectiveness of sanctions
against corrupt behaviour, have fallen short of expectation.
By increasing the chances of discovering corrupt practices, whistle-blowing makes it costly to search fora corrupt partner. By enhancing the transparency and control, individual’s actions done in behalf of a principal
whistle-blowing may promote an individual’s accountability and prevent the breakdown in principal-agent
relations that happens when a corrupt act is committed.
The potential of whistle-blowing to cure corruption is slowly gaining recognition and support in the publicand private sectors. In the Philippine Congress, several measures have been proposed to encourage whistleblowing. Generally, these bills suggest that the exposure of wrongdoings in government will deter corruption,and therefore, should be encouraged by instituting measures that will protect whistleblowers from reprisals
and harassment.
The motives for whistle-blowing and the lack of whistleblower protection have often lent controversy towhistle-blowing. Although whistle-blowing has been studied in considerable detail in developed economies,
there is still lack of similar studies in the Philippine contexts. Cultural obstacles notwithstanding, whistleblowing could be a promising anti-corruption practice in the Philippines. However, its adoption and eventual
institutionalization requires an in-depth look into the existing political, social, cultural and legal structuresthat hamper and promote the practice, as well as the level of awareness and attitude towards whistle-blowing
among direct stakeholders. In addition, any proposed measure towards its adoption should be carefully
designed, factoring an inherent pitfalls alongside potential benefits.

II. AN ACT PROVIDING FOR PROTECTION, SECURITY AND BENEFITS OF
WHISTLEBLOWERS“Proposed Whistleblower Protection Act of 2011”
A. Salient Features
Public Office is a public trust. It is the policy of the State to promote and ensure full accountability in theconduct of its officers and employees, and exact full retribution from those who shall engage in improper
conduct. Toward this end, the State shall:(A) Maintain honest and high standards of integrity in the public service;(B) Safeguard the national interest through the prosecution of corrupt and erring public officials andemployees; and(C) Encourage and facilitate the disclosure of corrupt conduct and practices in the public service by
providing benefits provided in existing laws.

B. Definition of Some Terms“Whistleblower” shall refer to any person who has personal knowledge or access to any data,* Senior Deputy State Prosecutor, Department of Justice, Philippines.

11

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No.86

information, factor event constituting improper conduct; Provided that such person must not have any direct
participation in such improper conduct, or in cases where such person participated in any improper conduct,such person is not the most guilty and shall therefore qualify as a state witness against the persons subjectof such disclosure.
“Qualified Whistleblower” shall mean a whistleblower qualified and admitted into the Whistleblower’s
Program of the Implementing Agency in accordance with this Act and its implementing rules andregulations.
“Acts constituting improper conduct” shall mean any act or omission of a public officer or employee
solely, or in cooperation, conspiracy with, or with the assistance of, private persons which is covered by orconstitute a violation of:(1) Presidential Decree No. 46 otherwise known as “Making it punishable for Public Officials and Employees
to receive, and for Private persons to give, gifts on any occasion, including Christmas;”(2) Republic Act No. 3019 otherwise known as “Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act;”(3) Republic Act No. 6713 otherwise known as “An Act Establishing a Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards
for Public Officials and Employees;”(4) Republic Act No. 7080 otherwise known as the “Anti-Plunder Law;”(5) Title VII of Book Two of the Revised Penal Code on Crimes Committed by Public Officers; and(6) All other laws which penalize or sanction any act or omission of a public officer or employee.
“Implementing Agencies or Agency” shall collectively or individually refer to the Department of Justice(DOJ), the Office of the Ombudsman, the Commission on Human Rights (CHR), and the Public Attorney’sOffice (PAO).

C. SEC. 4. Coverage
Notwithstanding the provisions of law on prescription of crimes, this Act shall cover all acts constituting
improper conduct irrespective of the time of commission.
D. SEC. 5. Admission/Qualification to the Program
Whistleblowers, whether from the public or private sector, shall be entitled to the benefits under this Act,
provided, that all the following requisites concur:(a) The disclosure is voluntary, in writing and under oath;(b) The disclosure relates to acts constituting improper conduct;(c) The information to be disclosed is admissible in evidence;(d) The whistleblower appears to be not the most guilty;(e) The whistleblower is not a beneficiary of the act or acts of improper conduct in the amount of morethan One Million Pesos (Php 1,000,000.00) or any kind of consideration of the same value.
It is only upon concurrence of the above requisites can a whistleblower be qualified and thus admitted into the program as provided for in this Act.
E. SEC. 6 Necessity of Testimony
The testimony of a whistleblower in court shall not be necessary for the entitlement of the benefits
and protection under this Act. In the event that the whistleblower’s testimony is required as found by theImplementing Agency to be necessary and indispensable for a successful investigation or prosecution of acase, he/she shall be entitled to the additional benefits and protection under Republic Act 6891, otherwise
known as the “Witness Protection, Security and Benefit Act”, funding for which shall be sourced from thebudget as provided under Section 32 hereof.
F. SEC. 7 Credibility of a Whistleblower
In all cases, the fact of the entitlement of the qualified whistleblower to the protection and benefits
12149TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS

provided in this Act shall not be admissible in evidence to diminish or affect his credibility.

G. SEC. 8 Perpetuation of Testimony
Once admitted into the program, a whistleblower may perpetuate his/her testimony pursuant to Rule 134of the Revised Rules of Court.
H. SEC. 9 Memorandum of Agreement with the Whistleblower
Before a person is provided protection and benefits as a whistleblower for the State, he/she shallfirst execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the Implementing Agency which shall set forth his/her
responsibilities including the following:(a) To provide information to and testify before all branches or agencies of government appropriate
proceeding on facts constituting improper conduct;(b) To avoid a commission of a crime;(c) To take all necessary precautions to preclude detection by others of the facts concerning theprotection provided him/her under this Act;(d) To cooperate with respect to all reasonable requests of officers and employees of the government
who are providing him/her protection under this Act; and(e) To regularly inform the appropriate program official of his/her current activities and address.
I. SEC. 10 Breach Memorandum of Agreement
Substantial breach of the Memorandum of Agreement provided for in Section 9 hereof, shall be a groundfor termination of the protection and benefits provided under this Act. Provided, however, that before
terminating the same the Implementing Agency shall send notice to the qualified whistleblower concerned,
stating therein the reason for such termination.
Provided, finally, that substantial breach of the Memorandum of Agreement shall be punishable byimprisonment of not less than six months but not more than one year independent and separate from anyother criminal liability that may be incurred by reason of such breach.

J. SEC 11. Confidentiality
Except insofar as allowed by this Act, during and after this disclosure, and throughout and after any
proceeding taken thereafter, a whistleblower is entitled to absolute confidentiality as to:(a) His/her identity;(b) The subject matter of his/her disclosure; and(c) The person to whom such disclosure was made.
There shall be no such confidentiality in his/her identity if a whistleblower makes a public disclosure ofa conduct constituting improper conduct unless, notwithstanding such public disclosure, he/she has takenmeans and measures obviously intended to preserve his/her anonymity.
K. SEC. 12 Confidential Information
No person to whom a disclosure has been made or referred shall divulge any information that mayidentify or tend to identify a whistleblower or reveal the subject matter of such disclosure, except only as tothe following circumstances:(a) The whistleblower consents in writing prior to a disclosure of an information;(b) The disclosure is indispensable and essential as determined by the Implementing Agency, taking
into consideration the necessary proceedings to be taken after the disclosure; or(c) The disclosure or referral is made pursuant to an obligation under this Act. The prohibition on
disclosure under this Section shall apply to any person who has become privy to any confidential
information, whether officially or otherwise.
L. SEC. 13 No Breach of Duty of Confidentiality
A whistleblower who has made a disclosure under this Act on whom a provision of law, regulation,issuance, practice or other convention, imposes upon him/her a duty to maintain confidentiality with respect
to any information disclosed, is considered not to have committed a breach thereof.
M. SEC. 16 False and Misleading Disclosures
A whistleblower who deliberately and voluntarily gives false or misleading information in connection
13RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No.86

with acts or omissions constituting improper conduct shall be guilty of an offense and shall suffer the penalty
of imprisonment of not more than two years and perpetual absolute disqualification from holding publicoffice, in case of public officer or employee without prejudice to other liabilities under existing laws.

N. SEC. 17 Protection against Disciplinary Action or Reprisals
A whistleblower who has made or is believed or suspected to have made a disclosure under this Act isnot liable to disciplinary action for making said disclosure.
Prohibited acts under this section include retaliatory action in a workplace or prejudicial conduct towards
a whistleblower, such as: discriminatory actions behind policies and procedures, reprimand, punitivetransfers, unwarranted referral to a psychiatrist or counselor, and undue poor performance reviews. Other
prejudicial actions include obstruction of an investigation, withdrawal of essential resources, undue reports
and the attachment of unfair personnel file notes.
To this end, any employer who shall discourage and impose sanctions or reprisals based on workplacesinteraction, which shall include workplace ostracism, questions and attacks on motives, accusations ofdisloyalty and dysfunction, public humiliation, and the denial of work or promotion, or who encourages,
causes or does retaliatory action or reprisal against the whistleblower or anyone believed or suspected to be
one shall be liable for an offense defined under this Act.
Any employee who refuses to follow orders of employers that would cause them to violate any provisionof this Act shall likewise be protected from reprisals and retaliatory action in the workplace.
For purposes of this protection, an applicant for employment shall be deemed an employee and entitled tosuch protection.
Provided however, that an employer of a whistleblower shall be notified through a certification issued by
the Implementing Agency within a period of 30 days, from the date when the whistleblower last reported
for work. Provided further that an employer shall have the opt ion to remove said whistleblower fromemployment after securing a clearance from the Civil Service Commission and the Department of Laborand Employment , which ever the case may be, in case of a prolonged absence due to transfer or permanent
relocation under this Act or RA 6891.

O. SEC. 18 Protection against other Actions
A whistleblower who has made a disclosure under this Act shall not be subject to any liability whether
administrative, civil, criminal for making such disclosure. No action, claim or demand may be taken against awhistleblower for making such disclosure, nor any evidence presented shall be use against him/her in court.
This protection shall also operate as immunity in favor of a whistleblower against any action orproceeding taken against him/her by reason of his/her disclosure.
Provided however, that the whistleblower appears to be not the most guilty.

P. SEC. 23 Financial Rewards for Whistleblowers
A qualified whistleblower shall be entitled to a corresponding monetary reward on a contingency basis,
equivalent to at least ten percent of the amount which may be recovered or the amount of one million pesos(Php 1,000,000.00), whichever is lower, as a result of his/her disclosure.
Q. SEC. 28. Powers and Functions of the Implementing Agencies or Agency
In addition to their respective powers and functions under existing laws, the Implementing Agencies
shall:(a) Supervise, monitor and coordinate all efforts relative to the implementation and enforcement of theprovisions of this Act;(b) Investigate all disclosures made under this Act, prosecute or recommend prosecution of the same
when warranted;

14

149TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS(c) Evaluate the qualification of whistleblowers for coverage within this Act, and whichever thecase may be, make the appropriate decision on their entitlement to the benefits and security andprotection extended herein;(d) Undertake, in coordination and cooperation with the private and public sectors, an information
campaign to educate the public on the provisions and benefits of this Act;(e) Develop plans and implement programs to further encourage whistleblowers on acts constituting
improper conduct with a view to effective deterrence and/or prosecution;(f) Control and administer, through coordination and consistent with the provisions and purpose ofthis Act, the protection and benefits of whistleblowers and the funds necessary to carry out theprovisions of this Act;(g) Call upon, or deputize and department, bureau, office or any other government agency or public
official to assist in the effective implementation and enforcement of this Act; and(h) Grant immunity in accordance with the provisions of this Act and its implementing rules andregulation.

III. CONCLUSION
Today, witness protection is viewed as crucial in combating organized crimes. In the investigation andprosecution of crimes, particularly the more serious and complex forms of organized crime, it is essentialthat witnesses have trust in the criminal justice system. This is the cornerstone of successful investigationand prosecution.
Experiences have shown that witnesses can turn hostile during crucial court proceedings due to threats,
coercion and monetary considerations and other innumerable corrupt practices ingeniously adopted tosmother and stifle truth. As we require observance of the laws by our citizens, let us also provide them withequal assurance of security and protection necessary to counteract the peril of being hunted or harassed byanti-social elements.
In the Philippines, witness and victim protection programmes are formal systems designed to provide
full range of physical protection, psychological support and other assistance to its beneficiaries. However,it should be emphasized that witness and victim protection cannot be viewed in isolation, rather, as a
crucial part of a comprehensive system designed to effectively investigate and prosecute perpetrators ofcrimes, including even human rights violations. Protection measures will be ineffective if other parts of thecriminal justice system do not function well. Every step of the process, from investigation to conviction andpunishment should be analysed. Possible risks to witnesses should be identified and reforms should be madeto limit those risks.
The issues related to whistleblower legislation are quite complex. The question of witness protection,for example, though not an obvious consideration, might arise in situations where a whistleblower becomesa witness in proceedings relating to the information disclosed. Particularly, the widespread hostility
towards individuals perceived as informers. This heightens the need for members of the public to beassured that adequate safeguards are implemented to secure their protection. An important advantage of
having whistleblower legislation is its tendency to foster development of internal mechanisms for handling
disclosure of wrongdoings within organizations, as this helps increase accountability and transparency.
Furthermore, whistleblowers whose exposes led to the prosecution of corrupt officials will be granted
immunity from administrative, civil or criminal liability and provided some form of financial assistance.
Since there is no such law in the Philippines, certain adjustments may be needed to the existing witness
protection and legal aid schemes in order to provide much needed support to whistleblowers. The speedy
enactment of the pending Whistleblower’s Bill by the Philippine legislature would certainly be a welcome
development.

15