Islamic Republic of

I R A N

Permanent Mission to the United Nations

Please check against delivery
Statement
By

His Excellency Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
President of the Islamic Republic of Iran

BeforeThe 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the
Non-Proliferation of Nuclear weapons (NPT)

United Nations, New York, 3 May 2010

In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful
All praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Universe, and peace and blessing be upon our
Master and Prophet, Mohammad, and his pure Household, and his noble
Companions""Oh, God, hasten the arrival of Imam Al- Mahdi and grant him good health andvictory and make us his followers and those who attest to his rightfulness"

Mr. President,
Distinguished delegates,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I thank the Almighty God for granting an opportunity to have a dialogue about
one of the key global issues of common concern. Undoubtedly, this Review
Conference of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is one of the most importantinternational meetings.

622 Third Ave, New York, NY 10017 Tel: (212) 687-2020 Fax: (212) 867-7086 email: iran@un.int

1I also would like to congratulate you Mr. President for your election to presideover this important meeting.
•'

Dear friends,•

The Pursuit of sustainable security is an inherent and instinctive part of humanbeing and a historical quest. No country can afford to ignore its security. The Divine
prophets and the righteous also sought to offer guidelines, in the light of their faith in
God and Divine teachings, to assure a safe and serene life in both worlds. To them,
the ideal society is a society of global scale based on the monotheism and justice andreplete with security, affection and brotherliness, and which is led by the noblest
servant of God along with the Jesus Christ (P.B.U.H) and other righteous people.
In the absence of sustainable security, it would be impossible to takecomprehensive plan for development and welfare.
Today, although a major part of the nations' resources are being allocated toproviding national security, there is hardly any sign of an improvement in thecircumstances as far as the perceived threats are concerned.
Regrettably, due to distancing of some States from the teachings of the Divine
Prophets, the shadow of the threat of nuclear bombs is cast over the whole world, andno one feels secured. Some States define in their strategies the nuclear bomb as anelement of stability and security, and this is one of their big mistakes.
The production and possession of a nuclear bomb, under whatever pretext be
done, is a very dangerous act which first and foremost makes the country of
production and stockpiling exposed. You may recall that how perilous was theunintentional transfer of a nuclear-tipped missile with a bomber from a military baseto another one in the United States and which became a matter of concern for theAmerican people. Secondly, the sole function of the nuclear weapons is to annihilate
all living beings and destroy the environment, and its radiations would affect the
coming generations and its negative impacts would continue for centuries.
The nuclear bomb is a fire against humanity rather than a weapon for defense.
The possession of nuclear bombs is not a source of pride; it is rather disgustingand shameful. And even more shameful is the threat to use or to use such weapons,
which is not even comparable to any crime committed throughout the history.
Those who committed the first atomic bombardment are considered to beamong the most hated in history.
For over sixty years, the United Nations, in particular the Security Council has
been unable to establish sustainable security and create the sense of security ininternational relations, and the current international circumstances seem to be far
more challenging than those of the past decades.

Wars, aggressions and above all the shadow of threat and stockpiling of
nuclear armaments, and worse than all, the policies applied by few expansionist
States, have obscured the prospect of international security for every one. Nowadays,
the communities' mindset is largely affected by a sense of intimidation and insecurity.
Nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation have not come true, and the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has not been successful in discharging its mandate.
During the past four decades, some, including the Zionist regime, have been equippedwith nuclear arms.
So, what really is the cause? To answer this question, one should look into thepolicies and practices of certain States as well as the inefficacy of and imbalance inthe pillars of the NPT, some of which are as following:
1- Seeking dominance
From the perspective of the Divine Prophets and the righteous and according
to all humane concepts, the supremacy, happiness and maturity of mankind ismeasured by his morality, piety, modesty and devotion to fellow human beings.
Unfortunately, relying on the theory of struggle for survival, some States seek theirsuperiority through the power of threatening and suppressing others, and sow theseeds of hatred, enmity and arms race in the international relations. Their biggest
mistake is their assumption that "might" makes "right".
2- The policy of producing and using nuclear weapons
The first atomic weapons were produced and used by the United States. Thisseemed, apparently, to provide the United States and its allies with the upper hand in
the World War II. However, it became the main source of development and the spreadof nuclear weapons by the others and brought about nuclear arms race. The
production, stockpiling, and qualitative improvement of nuclear armaments in a given
country have served as the best justification for the others to develop their own
arsenals, a trend that has sustained over the past forty years in violation of thecommitments set forth in the NPT.
3- Nuclear Weapon as a means for deterrenceThis policy is the main cause of the escalation of the arms race, since
deterrence requires having an edge in both quality and quantity of weapons, whichitself fuels the nuclear race. There are reportedly more than 20,000 nuclear warheads
worldwide half of which belongs to the United States. The other competing party also
continues the development of nuclear weapon under the pretext of deterrence. Both ofthem constitute violation of obligations under the NPT.
4- Threat to use nuclear weapons
Regrettably, the government of the United States has not only used nuclear
weapons, but also continues to threaten to use such weapons against other countries,
including Iran. Another country from the Europe also made a similar nuclear threat
under a false pretext a few years back. The Zionist regime, too, consistently threatens
the Middle Eastern countries.

5- The instrumental exploitation of the Security Council and International
Atomic Energy Agency•
Enjoying especial privileges in the highest global security decision-making
bodies and in the IAEA, certain nuclear weapon States widely exploit these platforms
against the non-nuclear weapon States, contrary to the spirit of the NPT. This unjust
practice, repeated over and over, has turned into a pattern.
.
So far, none of the non-nuclear weapon States has ever been able to exercise
their inalienable and legal rights for peaceful use of nuclear energy without facingpressures and threats. While despite clear provisions of article VI of the Treaty andthe Statute of the IAEA, no single report has been issued by the IAEA inspectors on
the nuclear weapons facilities of the United States and its allies, nor is there any planfor their disarmament, resolutions have been adopted against non-nuclear weapon
States under the pressure of the same States and under false pretext and with the clear
intention of denying them their recognized legal rights.
'
6- Using double standards
While the Zionist regime which has stockpiled hundreds of nuclear warheads,
has waged many wars in the region and continues to threaten the people and nationsof the region with terror and invasion, enjoys the unconditional support of the UnitedStates government and its allies and receives, as well, the necessary assistance todevelop its nuclear weapon program. The same States impose various kinds ofpressures on the members of the IAEA on the false pretext of probable diversions intheir peaceful nuclear activities without providing even a single credible proof tosubstantiate their allegation.
•
7- Equating nuclear weapon with nuclear energy
Nuclear energy is among the cleanest and cheapest sources of energy. Severe
climate change and environmental pollution caused by fossil fuel has intensified theneed to expand the use of nuclear energy. Almost 7 million barrels of oil are needed
for the continual generation of 1000 megawatt of electricity in a year which bytoday's crude oil price costs over 500 million dollars, while the cost of generating thesame capacity with nuclear energy is around 60 million dollars. Generally, theinvestment needed to construct and utilize a nuclear power plant is far less than half ofthe cost of a power plant operating with fossil fuels during its lifespan. The nuclear
technology can be effectively and widely applied in the production of medical
isotopes for diagnosis and treatment of life-threatening diseases as well as in industry,
agriculture and in other fields.
One of the gravest injustices committed by the nuclear weapon States isequating nuclear arms with nuclear energy. As a matter of fact, they want tomonopolize both the nuclear weapons and the peaceful nuclear energy, and by doing
so to impose their will on the international community. The aforementioned issues are
all against the spirit of the NPT and in flagrant violation of its provisions.
'8- Imbalance in the pillars of the NPT and the IAEA mandates
Although the NPT has as its key mandate the mission for prevention of nuclear
arms race, nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation as well as inalienable right of themember States to use peaceful nuclear energy, however, the most difficult conditions
have been put in the mechanisms and regulations for the countries seeking peacefuluse of nuclear energy. On the contrary, no effective mechanism has been devised toaddress the actual threat of nuclear weapons, which must be in fact the most importantmission of the IAEA. All efforts in this respect have been only limited to talks thatlack any binding force guarantee and effectiveness. The IAEA has been putting themost possible pressures on non-nuclear weapon States under the pretext ofproliferation risks, whilst those having nuclear bombs continue to enjoy full immunityand exclusive rights.
Dear friends,•
It is now clear that the production and stockpiling of nuclear weapons andpolicies practiced by some nuclear weapon States, along with the weakness of and theimbalance in the NPT provisions have been the main causes of insecurity and served
as an incentive for the development of such weapons.
Today, nuclear disarmament, elimination of nuclear threat and nonproliferation are regarded as the greatest service to establishing sustainable peace andsecurity and amity.
The question is, however, whether granting extraordinary authority in the IAEA to the
nuclear weapon States and entrusting them with the critical issue of nuclear
disarmament is appropriate? It would be nai've and irrational to expect an effective
voluntary initiative towards disarmament and non-proliferation, simply because they
consider nuclear weapons an element of superiority.
'
As an Iranian saying reads: "A knife never cuts its own handle "Expecting the major arms dealers to work for the establishment of security is
an illogical expectation.
The government of the United States which is the main suspect in the
production, stockpiling and use and threat of the use of nuclear weapons, insists toassume the leadership role in reviewing the NPT. The U.S. administration, in its
recently released Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), has announced that it will neither
produce new nuclear weapons nor will it attack non-nuclear weapon States by nuclear
weapons.
The United States has never respected any of its commitments. One may ask
how much could nations possibly trust the US to implement its commitments? What
are the guarantees for living up to such commitments? And what are the tools for its
independent verification? It should be born in mind that in the past decades the UnitedStates has had most of its wars and conflicts with those who were once its friends.
Furthermore, under the same NPR, some member States of the IAEA which are also
committed members of the NPT have been threatened to be the target of a pre-

emptive nuclear strike. The United States government has always tried to divert the
public opinion's attention from its noncompliance and unlawful actions by bringing
into focus some misleading issues. They have recently raised the issue of nuclear
terrorism as part of their efforts to maintain and upgrade their nuclear arsenals on one
hand, and divert world public opinion from the issue of disarmament and direct them
toward phony matters, on the other, while arming the terrorists with nuclear weapons
are only conceivable by those States which posses such weapons and have used themand also have a long record of supporting terrorists.
In its NPR, the U.S. has kept silent regarding nuclear strike against certain
nuclear weapon States in order to concentrate the propaganda pressure on certain
independent nations.
This is while certain major terrorist networks are supported by the U.S.
intelligence agencies and the Zionist regime. Credible evidence is available in thisconnection that will be publicized, if needed, during the forthcoming conference on
global fight against terrorism in Tehran.
In the NPR, it is noted that the U.S. will not develop new nuclear weapons, butthey will continue to improve them qualitatively. The qualitative improvement of
nuclear weapons is tantamount to increase in lethality and destructive power of such
weapons, which itself signifies the vertical proliferation. In addition, these policies are
not verifiable, because there is no supervision by any independent authoritative bodyon nuclear programs of the United States and its allies.
Comparing the Washington Nuclear Security Summit with the Tehran Nuclear
Disarmament and Non-proliferation Conference, the efforts of the host of the former
were aimed at preserving the monopoly over the nuclear weapons and superiority onother countries, while in the latter Conference all participants were seeking a world
free from nuclear weapons. The motto of the Tehran Conference was, "Nuclear
Energy for all, Nuclear Weapons for no one".
.
'
Mr. President,
Distinguished delegates,
To realize the humane aspiration for nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation as well as the peaceful use of nuclear energy, I would like to offer thefollowing proposals:
1 - Review and accomplishment of the NPT:The NPT should be evolved to Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation
Treaty (D.N.P.T) and the nuclear disarmament must be put at the core of its
mandates through transparent, binding, and effective mechanisms buttressed withsolid international guarantees.

2- Establishment of an independent international group with full authority from theConference to prepare a set of guidelines to operationalize the provisions of article
VI of the NPT, including planning and fully supervising nuclear disarmament andpreventing proliferation.
The group should conduct its work with effective participation of all
independent countries, by setting a deadline for complete elimination of all
nuclear weapons, within a specified timetable.
3- Introduction of legally-binding comprehensive security guarantees without
discrimination or precondition until the achievement of a complete nuclear
disarmament on the part of the nuclear weapon States.
4- Immediate termination of all types of research, development or improvement of
nuclear weapons and their related facilities, as well as introduction of averification mechanism by the above-mentioned group.
5- Adoption of a legally binding instrument on the full prohibition of production,
stockpiling, improvement, proliferation, maintaining and use of nuclear weapons.
6- Suspension of membership in the Board of Governors of the IAEA for thoseStates which use or threat to use nuclear weapons.
.
The presence and political influence of these States has so far prevented the
IAEA from performing its mandates, particularly with regard to articles IV and VI
of the Treaty, and has caused the Agency to deviate from conducting its
authorized missions. In particular, how could the government of the United States
be a member of the Board of Governors while it has not only used nuclear bomb
against Japan but also used depleted uranium weaponries in Iraq war?
7- Cessation of all kinds of nuclear cooperation with non-member States of NPT and
adoption of effective punitive measures against all those States which continue
their cooperation with such non-member States.
8- Considering any threat to use nuclear weapons or attack against peaceful nuclear
facilities as a breach of international peace and security, and swift reaction fromthe United Nations and termination of all cooperation of NPT member States withthe threatening/aggressor State.
:

9- Immediate and unconditional implementation of the resolution adopted by 1995
Review Conference on the establishment of a nuclear free zone in the Middle
East.
10-Dismantling of nuclear weapons stationed in the military bases of the UnitedStates and its allies in other countries, including Germany, Italy, Japan, and theNetherlands.
11- Collective effort to reform the structure of the Security Council.

The current structure of the Security Council is extremely unfair andinefficient and mainly serves the interests of the nuclear weapon States. Reforming
the structure of the Council along with reviewing and accomplishing the NPT are
interrelated and essential for realization of the IAEA's objectives.

Distinguished Delegates,•
Representing a great, civilized and rich-in-culture nation of Iran, who has
always been the herald of worshiping God, justice and peace in the world, I announce
the readiness of the Islamic republic of Iran to partake in the materialization of those
proposals and just plans on disarmament and non-proliferation, as well as peaceful useof clean nuclear energy.
I pronounce that a nation which has bread great pesonalities such as Ferdousi,
Hafez, Sanaee, Vahsh Bafghee, Avicenna, Aboureihan, Shahriar, and otherindependent and freedom-seeker, intellectual and wise personalities like Imam
Khomeini, and bestowed them to the humanity; a nation which has always called forlove, compassionate, and peace for mankind; a nation the poem of whose great poet
Saadi is glaring in the United Nations which: "Of one Essence is the human race,
Thusly has Creation put the Base"; a nation which abolished slavery 2500 years ago, I
mean the great nation of Iran, is not in need of nuclear bombs for its development anddose not regard it a source of honor and dignity.
The logic and will of the Iranian nation is a reflection of the logic and will of
all nations.
All nations love peace, brotherhood, and monotheism and suffer fromdiscrimination and injustice. Many of my colleagues, the heads of States, and many ofsympathetic and justice-seeker dignitaries and commentators, in their talks with me,
have shared this view that there is a dire need for global disarmament and expansionof peaceful use of clean nuclear energy and breaking the monopoly imposed in thesefields, as contained in the foregoing proposals. This is the heartfelt demand of all
independent nations and States that: "Nuclear energy for every one, Nuclear weapon
for no one." Accordingly, my presence and the essence of my statement here in thisvery Conference is only a representation of their presence and demands.
.

Distinguished Colleagues,.

Now, may I say a few words to those who still maintain that production andstockpiling of nuclear weapons are sources of their power and dignity.
They must realize that the era of reliance on nuclear bomb has already passed.
Production, stockpiling and the threat to use weapon, in particular nuclear weapon, isfor people characterized by lack of consistent logic and wise behavior. Using threatagainst the strong logic belongs to the past and is not viable anymore. Current era is
the age of nations, thoughts and cultures. Relying on weapons in international
relations is the legacy of unwise and anachronic States.

•:

It is crystal clear that the hegemonic policy has failed and the dreams forestablishing new empires are vain hopes and will never come true.
Rather than continuing with the failed policy of the predecessors, It would bebetter to join the wide and transparent ocean of nations, independent states and human
wisdom and culture. This would be in their best interest. The future belongs to thenations. Security, peace and justice would be established by righteous people andperfect man throughout the world. The power of logic would prevail over the logic ofpower. There will be no room in the future for bullying and the arrogant. Common
movement of the nations throughout the world for fundamental reforms based on
monotheism and justice has already begun in international relations.
I invite Mr. Obama, the President of the United States to join this humane
movement, if he is still committed to his motto of "change", since tomorrow would be
too late for this. I would like to appreciate the efforts of the President of theConference, distinguished audience and all those who strive for the establishment ofpeace and justice in the world.

Dear friends,
Through cooperation and solidarity and harmony, our aspiration forestablishing a world blessed with justice and peace is achievable, and the motto of"nuclear energy for all, nuclear weapons for none" is the basis for interaction among
human beings as well as between human and nature.
Let's hope for a day on which through realization of justice, no one will be
infuriated, and even if so happened, let's hope again no weapon would be found tosatisfy it.
Greeting to justice and liberty,
Greeting to love and affection,
Greeting to followers of the school of compassionate, and human who loves
human,•

I wish you all, success and prosperity.
.

•