¢%& ¯+*1°¡ +3 ± ++ ²,*³ ´ 6± - µ ´7 ¶'./± 1 ²-+³ ·¸¹´%º»¯ +*1 °ISSN *-21¼0*+,

῎ῌῌ῏&῍῍'     + 
Field Evaluation of Compost, Sawdust and Rice Straw Biomass on Soil Physicaland Hydraulic Properties M.K. EUSUFZAI, T. MAEDA and K. FUJII
- !  " # ῌ$% &'ῌ() *+ῌ,- ./ +1

01232 45 Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test 6PITT7? @A B CDῌEῌ

8

FῌGH

NAPL 9:;<=>

IῌJK

 ,1

LMNOL0PQ5MRMSTL0 8UVWTL0XY Z[\@A

a]ῌ^_` -1

bLcdefghijklmnopqῌrstuῌv, w ./ xyiDz#{|f}~! v, w /1

ῌ





\  K

Iῌ  0-

,ῌ>thi2 8 <(ῌJ. À
SIMU÷NEKῌ  13

 

S. Takagi  , ¡¢f£\  ¤¥ ¦§ ¨ 31©ª «¬!:n_­ " '+*1 Forest Environments in the Mekong River Basin ®a #$+*3

 !" +++# $% ++0῏ ῎ ῐ ῑ ῍ ῌ
&2CU:*62 =VW<>X1
 +   Japanese Society of
Soil Physics ῏ `!ab@ab@cE ] BS`!?\TD ,  


 
  
 1  ?F5 + dMGH *62IS -  !
ῌ Hef6gh BiVW !]"#ῌj Jkῌgk KLlMg2 H
 $%&'(῍ ) * Journal of the Japa&2'2BmX1
nese Society of Soil Physics+  
῍ *62 2<Z =:%;82<,-"> H6n R%!op῎ .
 / *626??\1 i῎ H*626gT9NGHOPg
0
῏ PQ KLl H>Qq
1! "#ῐ   $%%
- R , MG3%!
 2  E *62H6r
 .  2 &2 '23(W ? A? BST2?`!\1
2 4)2 . 5 2% 
s" Es" $%%tST 2

*62+,78%819%:%; -  < ./ =08>
 3  
T2NOῌ <ZuT2
%819%:%;&2CU:*62 =VW<>X1  /  2 1?2@3AB 4C*62<Zu/,/** E῍ BST2&  2
5D-,*** E'2
5D
&2CU:*62 =VW<>X1T6F'GH
2 =VWmX1 ),-,,,/** E
BS U
3(2IJ5D
1,/** E῎ V<vT2
4)2
)5D
+/,*** E
K L 73(2&2CU:*62 =VW<>X1T,,,/** E
2 =VWmX1 V<v
3(2M.
 0  
82NO 9@ , 5+* r11wWxVWiW ]5XF5 . y + 3 zAPQ - @:;R9,%; <>=>
=Y5 - y -+ 3 {|ῌ ? + @ A? + @ BST2? + @ZKῌ :[\ 1UR}&2CU:*62 =VW<>X1
]O῍~2.*ῑ2/*, ^_ + `a*62
Y +/ @ &2CU:<Z =VW<>6 b' ῍ K ,**1 5 . y + 3="X1
,**0. +*. +. &[ - @M?\&2CU:TD῎ ]^_ , @῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍ 

cdeq2Bi PQ BST
2\fQg B%;,hBST2\g2 BST2 *!+ N= *+ ;W , @i  + @)q<B)
f- iR =+ *!+ Original papers : jk\i 
N=
l
$%X1C IB !QWm
mW;W ) nC , *+ Notes : 

oQ;!
=>p%&q;rLB
jk\i) nC- *Hs+ Reviews : 
t
;W 1AB
HQ =uC. *s+ Lectures : 
!
o]v%s %:+ / w %&/ *w + My research : ¡¢"VW; )M £¤X1!
G¥x%& ;Wv%w
0 *¦7+ Miscellaneous : KO2§v%rLyr1 *z¨+ Readers’ column : *+©{ ;W|}ª$%&2 *.*+ Book reviews
.
i-G\ 0 «¬MQ 1
­g + «¬i 3,*** Eeq~
 A ®¯,-g 1eq~/ fQW *°d±+ Foreword *²³+
Lecture series N =  *´ µ ¶ ¬ · ¸ w +Symposium reviews NO *²³+  *s+¹%º;%;\ BST2\»jQW
Pd |VW"#C¼ *´µ¶¬·¸w+´µ¶¬·¸w !

0   + ,-    !"#$1 
%&
'()* +, ,  -./ 0 1

2 23 #4 #5 0 678!9:;#$(<"=>(?
#3 @#@ A( , $ #$!BCDA %:#$+* C -* &' E;8(F)*+$++ ,G-.:; HI-./J
K0
,**.. 1. + L

+  ,M,NM"12, ,M A.3,/4,-O((=PQ
-* mm 8( 56( . 7" + R S#- ,M   895  T
3,M":; << E U(NM":;(< V+W X =0YZ =[>$&\,?<]3 , @ + R S= ^A ,M"=0YZ(=[> / _8! `a b5. ,M B?cdefgh i NMd=
0YZῌ=[>:j(,? kNM" +1/ words
CD Abstract ( / _8! Key words E;
/ ,M   lF(-G) 8
95  ,? m,M" -/* 4CD Hn
0 NM  A. 3 op+qR q"HIJ 0** words " + R S#
1 NM   895  T3
 Manuscript title, Full names of authors, Address of institutions of authors $&\,?
<]3
2 NM   lF(-G) 895  Address of institutions of authors (,?
k +1/ words CD N? Abstract ( / _8!
NM Key words E;
3 NM   895  ,?
m,M":;(< =0YZ =[> -/*4CD Hn / _8! ` a b #c rsK A 3,ML HI
tM# NML&\ NOd
PQ" ;\HI+*  uRHv wSxT3 ,?O' / OU<E;
++ NM Vxy PQc$Oz( WX{JB? 12%@|} UNM
W~pq d :;$4),$+, uRYm0(<
 ῌZ[ ?V~+\]
+- ,? ^ ?  +., ,., -., _ ?  +. +
+. , +. -  ?  +. +. + +. +. , +. +. - dz+.   ~ ` 4[%(< =<?
4# ,\$?4 ab 32"+/ cM c'z(< T3E; (< <d(( e : f~gh
CEC
+0 i $j si SI d+1 ,M " T : kl 'T + :, kl - dz5 NMmj
Fig. +, Table ,, Photo. - dz5NM "Tῌkl(Fig. +, :Table , dz5+2 ,M B? fgh i  T : kl;<NMnj+3 T : kloH0p!D( \4:(Tqr:4s,* T : kl + 7U A. 3"HI& , A. 3 t 56<(T:`'2"j,+ T(klE ,,uv:; " w#,, T +ῌ, x#(cdE ypS , x5\$z<55 T { |:%?4 z<:C( z<:}/3
,- >T%~ kl y%xS
#$,. T : kl '(;< ,(3:(,/ ,?"?¡¢ < , <  ( e : Tanaka +33.
Nakamura and Suzuki, +32+  - <8(@ + < U(£\ , et al.  e : ¤ \ +312 Tayler et al., +3./,0 ¢?¡ ,? U(< ABC 
5 : ¥¢?¡(j.#$
,1 ¢?¡ <j8= dzBouma, J. and Dekker, L.W. (+312) : A case study
on inﬁltration into dry clay soil, I. Morphologicalobservations. Geoderma, ,* : ,1ῌ.*.
FAO (+322) : Revised legend of the FAO-UNESCO
Soil Map of the World. p. ++3, FAO, Roma.
¦ § +31* : -./(Rb¨S  Rb¨S
qi +. : ,2ῌ--.
¤©ª +303 : -./ p. // «¬
­G R S p. % pp. #$ , i
R S p., rR S
 pp. 
,2 ,H ®& {J¯ ¯° SIST
±
,**.. 0. ,3 L[  SI  ]siSI$5v/"²:;
-./Z $i $ "e
:;i 3\;ikg kg´+*³
m- m´[ ³SmL, cm-, mL[
kg m´-, Mg m´¡D
kg m´-, Mg m´- g L´+, mg L´+¢D
mol m´mol L´+µ+¢DN£kPa, m, cm, **L¶·+ J kg´+
m s´+
cm s´+¤¸~gh molc kg´+, cmolc kg´+
s´+
min´+
¹¥
kg m´,
kg ha´+, Mg ha´+, t ha´+¦h
* ῍: §(L¨(L) !g\T$** cm H, O #$
E © ºª U $»?«$"¼¬,***. -. +* L+ 

   !"#$%&'(%) $* + !" ,-(.
/0$1234  4 * + !"56$%7/2 89 $( !":$) ; <
 = )>?
, @= 1-(  *A+  *B +*C!"+ D?E#9 F
,4$%&GHI3D J$(K'L()$(0$$($(M% @= 1 M*Nῌ /%(+O PQRSQTUV423 W+, XYZV[-\O,O <,-(.23
-O ./ XY]0^+_`1+ 423
῍ 2a/%(+O 34b45-(%3
,O 2647823
-O ,92a47823
.O c,def[gh[i:,j47823
/O SI ;kilmn%47823
0O oVpVq47823
1O cr2a47823- s<44t=K>L
?u@$(%3v$w s< ) ?u@$(%%-\  A,x
B%\6> 1$ s < yE))C-\42N)
. FDEzF
s < 4 *
+ x!"56$% 89  {GH=F|%) 
7
IF,J $ F}K$)

F,$(L~M/%(N;%$(%)
+O OI A,23 ) P ,4123
,O F QiR|91 %3 #-( JS !"T7 U %3
-O F, ,$(XY .V-
%3 #-( WiX@8)Y 3
.O F}KL3
F,ZB6M/%( 
4@= 1@=(A,[@=) $ 3
A, .i\ 2N)>? OI 2)A,2N)
/ F]]ῌ +, XYZV[/%( , ^E_/%( + ^7I,
xF}K$)
῍ F, *,+ @= D/%(`$ F^34;Da b
xc$)῎ F^d$ 
 $) 3 +,ῌXYZV[/%( e$(MD9N%)
+O F, , f1g\ 4 A W3))!":O-\  F^s -h<s W!" O $)A 19 + f B W bM4
,O + fg\[ !":O -\ ) , f1 B
-\  b/%(A,i¡E>
[@=) [4jZ 
4[v$GMs $)-O + fg\B 19 + f C W bM4[w ¢F2NO -\ )
, f1 C -\ b/%(A,ii'[@=) jZ[ ¢F|%)
.O + fg\ 4 D W!"T7O -\  k- F, }K3£= 
4$)
/O , fg\ 1 D -\  E U
< (A,xC$)
0O F , ¤)$ ¢F;%(1 C )D  42-\  4$)
῏ F^g\  D  U ~D9
1
+O ¥l2¦1,O m_§E¨N421
-O ©%  ;ª4n (%`«%1 W+, XYZV[-\O
.O *o4n (%  W$%p43%1 W+, XYZV[-\O/O [§E b$£?%
1
0O q"¬­b(;N + ®rV$
1=4%1
1O 34bi,94s¯  4
%1
2O 4<°j\6%1
3O E <!"$(56$
%1
0 E+O A, 3 4OIt-(M% 
A,4%1
6 y EA,4?%D9E±f42
-\  F&²$(C342N),O [Cu-\  [^4³
_ D9¤vw W b$[´xῌµyO ¶$ z<$(M%
-O  µ{·¸¹2|º`Q
}N) F$( )~/ $(M% ¨J42--\ E¨JJ  ¨Js %D
9w»=()4@= ).O *!"T7+ C¢-\WB%N) *!"T7+ $U_vῌ¼R= ¢$(M%
W,**.. 0. ,3 »[O

+      !"# , $ %&' ! "(%)%*+!  !( ,-. /01 ῌ 2 !
+3 4567589:;<,1 = >?@:A3
,3 BC1D!EF;<,1-3  >?G.HI<J;<,1῍ K2 !
+3 )%LD! <,1
,3 K !F;<,1-3 " !F;<,1.3 MNOPAQRA#$S !F;<,1
/3 SI %TUVW & !F;<,1
03 X:Y:Z !F;<,1
13 M[K !F;<,1- $\]' ' 1<(1 ! "^_(`a.-
+3 b)1c#-<(,3 d$*+e,fg;<(-3 h0i jFk %<lmn.-! <Jo ( = >?@:A3
.3 ./-n.-! <pqF 0
1r
k ( = >?@:A3
/3 s2 $<e,t3u 4kvwF<(03]xyFL#-! g + z156 j(17+j (13 L8{F 9:F|(
23 B}S~ (33 /; B\]<)%1 !#~ k
 (. )%<<=>;kF?C;g j )%@C9A<(F/ B9C _(F;gw D! r D\]' (gw
0 C %C< !>?t<6;gw ^D! 0jhE$*FGq!"# 1 C?C1HIJK F"#  ?C
1Ln! =>F 
2 C1 !1gMjN)% 
<xF(OPῌPQRSw zT"# 
3 ?Cs2 *+jFU9: D=\]' 3 1<,1 C1D!(?C
1D!(VW,F XY )%
! s2 *+ _^g( $\]' '1 !ZgH !.0j %<^_[ j&^ ;g / $\]' '( =$-' \3 ] !"#  ^t3ur'$F+* C.  rQ;< _ $  r' 1 !^ U=,**-. /. ,2 `3῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍

+ a bb1cP :bk, d bde + ¡  B $fgh' ¢<- ijῌ b2 + k£l^gij#-j(¤m1<
῍ ijn:oa _$*pq¥  rR<
῎ cP :b2 !ij _$1 . s¦ bt§u¨s¦ s¦!_/ v b.wU!v _0 /;ῌ bij ( s¦ ©
x.s¦<,1F|<῍ bªy< $fgh' )z1 !«bNe . ¬ + {.«be ¬ -+ {F\]#-j)? $' <|1<
῎ cP :b<|C fgh­®
6¯°P :)C =}3 1< Wg±F;D!(<|v+<=,**,. ++. ,- ~: ,**-. ++. ,, 23+ , bs¦ =£"1 _3 b²¨cP :bs¦ _,1 ,
1<
, ³
2o³_ῌ b´:0ikb²¨cP :bs¦῍ fghbs¦µ</;u- L  + k ^¨ / kX¶D!L<ῌ 2^gL#-<῍ ij0i|UF·:<῎ > , e1< jp  >#ja῏ ¸s^gsR<ῐ ¹ºk
k,1 7+<. »¼ e - ¡X»¼<=,**,. ++. ,- ~: ,**-. ++. ,, 23῍ ῎ ῐ ῌ ῏ 













:     !"# $%

&'(
&')
*+,
- : / ./0*+,)- : / ./0

123 +
456
123 ,
456
123 45678

 

9ῌ:978 

9ῌ:978 

9ῌ:9; < = > 3?

7

B@AῌFAX 
E-mail

&



N

FAX :

Eomail :CDEF

M

TEL :

O

A. : 

E ῌ .** 6GCDHI 

E

J

E

E
K L

E

-* P ῌ /* P ῌ +** P ῌ +/* P ῌ ,** P ῌ -** P: QDRS=T!UVWXYZ[\]^_R`a http : //wwwsoc.nii.ac.jp/jssp-/

  !"#$ῌῌ 
  FAX E-mail

% & ' () ῌ *) ῌ +,-.

/ 0 1 2 345

) 6 7 89 ῌ :; ῌ <= ῌ >?

@

1

2

3

A

B CDEF=G
H

I ῌ J

8

;12 451ῌ2
K

L

45

1



KLMNOPKLQRSTῌFAX ST
KL E-mailU V W MPUVQRSTῌFAX ST
UV E-mail)XY:)Z[ \M]:)Y)
^123 :_`123 :
ῌa#bcd
efgh:)Li jLk
P2.*ῌ2/*, lmnlmoYpq + SO
lmr:s:t;guvw:w' x yz 
TelῌFex. *3/,ῌ,2ῌ21/1
E-mail : choh@cc.saga-u.ac.jp

KL ῌ UV

2  
J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
coF4
No. +*1, p. +, ,**1   *+*        

 !"#$%& #'(!)*+,&-#./

01( !23* 4&51# - (!/& 1!6
 789:;%< =  (!>&1?@:A:BC;!D&"E#F$%'* &%GH;!D

L:MKNO' ('!D &PQ)*R+S*T)*&IJK

U,VW XY0/ S O'!-.Z[\%Y& ](^/? 7- _
9:8?89:;!`\a2bc0deAfgh?i10." 1#jk23l4?S/ = /\m5noY& n jk23l4*p!64R/1" ]]!64R)!q,3* 78n3 ]9S^/?SnY&[\a:&r;#[Y0<,0=s!t>#S?@&! A2*3*u 7BCS89:;r;%?Dm5 = >6vpn" ^/E#!FrwS/
xx6Y& yz G , n3?R/(! 3*&! >&(#[(?HnY& ](! FlI89:; #{\|J #KL}!6nY&?
~
Mjk? M#N%O='P"{/ ]QR4@3n#%k ]\/\
m5 SS 4D\89:; TU4O%QRVF&;:W? X YZ2SQR?

TU4[%w c\]20#SM80n3DP[\&" !Dy1VF#&Y0X^c^'0_%`Qa& n# !bS/ c*br;%
#? [\#0 3*&U46/0O'?aOw nS!3 !"/  defgUO'c h O'? ijk%lE
1&0d)/b!m$#S QR4@3n#%jk?n# o#
P"{\O ? ]pq r8stwu!q,3*0/a='%lI#0  {/!Sv0 ww& $¡Z0¢[\ w$#?£*x!" T£*xWy?z#[Y0¤0/ ¥¦#>Y0xZp ;:@§ῌ¨©:ª[\ST{|}03Zp[/?[\S£*x~&«cn#b% ¬¨©:ª#­00XwS $='#%*p$?n®@!Y&S"E#$#W¯)°!w ]0 t2S

±? $ h#/&i²K³; ]*#´ n3 $%µ0* ῌ¶u·T ¸k ¹-*/ῌ20*3 _pº»¼ ,ῌ+ῌ0

5iRj< £ +*1 º »,**1¼

2

     !" # $ !"



% & '(# ) *+"*, 

-

.

(#!" / 0 $ 12# !
3"!" ##4$5%  &%67' 8 7)(
67' ) .*/ 9+,-*, :,.(,/
67'; <="  0>?12="@3(A4$5="6*/
67' :.BC"DE 8F
38"&%8" (#7G $5% 8 8.,="$5%H8"I  39:J ;FK
$5<LM=   A ">N?@*O,O>ABCPQ#*, PRSTUV D0 PEFGHW
F PXY HZI&.J [KO* C.0L \$]S, MN'-^O ,-P_`UabcdQRSe+TE U).&fVC" ,O=g8"DWXHYhJ i I$ Zj`k[*\l m>n*] ,nJ opq^r_`8s\ (a*bcdtuv*we*x  $5%f$yz{-g*h| " V}b~J* +I$ 5iRj 5;[ k;* ^r8@lb~m 9+# - @nokuvp qJ  rstu

H s*svwx

y=" 5iRjLz o{|H .$ v}~s*kHH  g  vH .$ $5%/*
V}b~wx*$g JHGn " !H
H 
  wx8qV}b~^rs x*¡¢b£H¤ "D¥8
J 3; ¦§¨q©u ªX(A_`~«`cvsr*qJ$5%#o*¬$BCw 8 9­"®
8V¯ V¯`*L°dt*±B ¨aVU 0
²%!³?*´E 2^µ*¶*|¦p+" 3v · 3m¸ *¡¢=" 3¹wxy/8ῐ
J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
ῐ῎῍ῑῒ῏
No. +*1, p. -ῌ+0 ῍,**1῎Field Evaluation of Compost, Sawdust and Rice Straw
Biomass on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties
Moniruzzaman Khan EUSUFZAI*, Takeki MAEDA** and Katsumi FUJII*** The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Iwate University,-ῌ+2ῌ2 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate *,*ῌ2//*, Japan** Dept. of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University,-ῌ+2ῌ2 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate *,*ῌ2//*, Japan
Abstract
A ﬁeld experiment was carried out to investigate the e#ects of compost, sawdust and rice straw
biomass on soil three-phase composition, soil resistance to penetration, bulk density, nearsaturated hydraulic conductivity, K (h), and soil water retention characteristics. The experimental design involved ten split blocks such that the non-amended one plot was considered as control
and other nine plots were under each of compost, sawdust and straw treatments at application
rates of *.+, *., and *.- m- mῌ- of apparent soil volume. Addition of compost, sawdust and straw
showed potential for improvement of surface soil physical and hydraulic properties, then its
e#ectiveness was partly dependent on amendment types and application rates. Three-phasecomposition of all amended soils showed solid-phase reductions and increase of total porosity.
Generally, soil resistance and bulk density at all amendment plots were decreased, which was
likely due to reduction in soil solid phases. A good correlation between soil resistance and bulk
density was also observed. Except for sawdust applied at higher rate, the K (h) generally increased at any level of compost and straw incorporations, and this was attributed to the of
reduction in solid phase of amended soils. Soil water content was relatively high at higher suction
for compost amended soils, while improvement in soil water retention was limited at lower
suction for sawdust, and gradually increased from low to high suction for straw amended soils,
respectively.
Key words : Biomass, bulk density, near-saturated hydraulic conductivity, soil resistance, soil
three-phase composition, soil water retention+.

Introduction

Application of crop and plant biomass for
improving soil organic matter (SOM) and enhancing soil quality is well recognized in sustainable agriculture (Carter et al., +332 ; Kay,
+332). Although these biomasses are often regarded as agricultural wastes, development ofagricultural conservation practices aimed atenhanced soil quality, however, have resulted
in very diverse methods of organic residue
management. Recycling of these surplus agri-

cultural byproducts has the advantage to meet
nutrient requirements for the crop and expanded use as e#ective soil amendments. Manure and composted manure have been studied
for long time as the organic amendments. Dueto labor shortages as well as increasing farmmechanization, application of manure andcomposted manure has been gradually decreased over the last few decades. At the same time,
direct application of crop and plant biomass as
soil amendments has received considerable interest. Among these types of biomass, com-

῏

4



post, sawdust and rice straw can be used ase#ective soil amendments. Rice straw is usually left in the ﬁeld after harvest and is subsequently burnt or used as animal feed. Sawdust
obtained as byproducts of lumber mill is usually thrown into the ground or simply burned up.
During the last several decades, much attention has been paid to the utilization of crop andplant residues as soil amendments, as well as toevaluate the e#ects of existing organic matterson soil physical properties such as soil structure and aggregate stability (Tisdal and Oades,+32, ; Oades, +32. ; Martens and Frankenberger, +33, ; Carter and Stewart, +330 ; Debosz etal., ,**,), porosity and pore size distribution(Pagliai et al., +321 ; Boyle et al., +323 ; Martensand Frankenberger, +33, ; Schjonning et al.,+33. ; ,**, ; ,**/), bulk density (BD) (Gupta etal., +311) and water holding capacity (Khaleel etal., +32+ ; Miller et al., ,**, ; Rawls et al., ,**-).
Addition of organic matter decreases bulk density due to the dilution e#ect of added organic
matter with the denser mineral fraction (Gupta
et al., +311). From their report, yearly additionof ./* t ha+ of anaerobically digested sewage
sludge for two consecutive years decreased thebulk density of ﬁeld coarse sandy soils by ,2ῌ.
The e#ect of residue management on soil bulk
density and soil resistance expressed as cone
index has been found to be variable (Mandal etal., ,**.). On the contrary, Bhagat and Verma(+33+) observed that incorporation of rice straw
at an application rate of / t ha+ yr+ to a wheatrice crop sequence, reduced ﬁeld bulk densityfrom +.-, to +.,/ Mg m-. Debosz et al. (,**,) reported the ,/ῌ increase in water stable aggregates of sandy loam soil amended with household compost at constant temperature (+*).
Several studies demonstrated with biosolids
and composted biosolids suggested increased
soil water retention and aggregate stability insilt loam soils (Epstein, +31/ ; Epteien et al.,+310 ; Wei et al., +32/ ; Lindsay and Logan, +332).
For evaluating the e#ects of manure additionon pore-size distribution, Schjonning et al. (+33.)
observed that farmyard manure or slurry sig-

+*1

,**1

niﬁcantly increased the volume of pores for *., and *., to *.- mm within ,* cm depth fromthe soil surface while they noticed no e#ect onpores for  -* mm. In another study, Pagliai etal. (+321) reported that poultry manure increased pores for -* to /** mm and those for /** mm. Addition of animal manure has greater
e#ect on macroporosity and conductivity insubsoil below plowing layer compared to plowlayer (Schjonning et al., ,**/). For a long-term
manure amended soil, Miller et al. (,**,) reported that soil water retention was signiﬁcantly increased by / to .2ῌ (*ῌ/ cm and +*ῌ
+/ cm soil depths) compared with the control
at di#erent matric potentials between * and+/** kPa.
The increased SOM with organic amendments applied to agricultural ﬁelds, as indicated by Boyle et al. (+323), improves the soil
aggregation, and this improvement of soil
structure favors the downward soil water ﬂow.
Although manure and composted manure asorganic amendments have been addressed inseveral studies, very little research has been
done in order to observe the e#ects of sawdust
and straw as soil amendments on soil physicalproperties. To date there is little informationon the e#ect straw and sawdust soil amendments on the hydraulic conductivity of soils(Garnier et al., ,**.). In particular, there might
have not been any reported ﬁeld studies forevaluating the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity under straw and sawdust application.
For optimal land application of these biomasses as soil amendments, understanding of theinﬂuence of these amendments on soil physicaland hydraulic properties is essential. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate
the e#ects of compost, sawdust and straw incorporated as amendments on the three-phasecomposition of soil, bulk density and soil resistance, the hydraulic conductivity and soil water
retention characteristics.

῎῍ : Field Evaluation of Compost, Sawdust and Rice Straw Biomass on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties,.

Materials and Methods

Site Description and Experimental Design
The experiment was conducted in an uplandfallow ﬁeld at the Iwate University Experimental Station, Morioka, Japan. The ﬁeld was not
subject to under tillage practices during thelast two decades. Before cultivation the ﬁeld
was prepared to cut tall grass down to groundlevel. The soil is volcanic ash soil, andisol andclay loam in texture (.-.2ῌ sand, .,.+ῌ silt &+..+ῌ clay). The average values of soil properties measured at the beginning of the experiment within *ῌ/ cm soil depth were as follows :particle density ,.1+ Mg mῌ- ; bulk density +.,*
Mg mῌ- ; total carbon +*0 g kgῌ+ ; and total nitrogen +.02 g kgῌ+ (dry soil basis).
The rectangular ﬁeld of approximately +**m, was arranged as a split block design. Totalten plots each comprising an area of +./ by ,.*m were established in this study. Amendment
types and rates were considered as treatments
in nine plots and the other one non-amended
control plot was used for measurement andresult comparison purposes. Field experiment
was performed from July ,**/ to June ,**0.
Amendments were applied once in the middleof July ,**/ to these nine plots. We did notcultivate any crop but periodical weeding management was performed in every three months
interval. Sampling and measurements of soil
physical and hydraulic properties were carriedout in June ,**0, i.e. at the end of one year.
,. , Amendment Types and Application
Rates
Amendment types applied to treatment plots
included three di#erent biomasses : compost,
sawdust and fresh rice straw. Compost used assoil amendment in this study was a mixture ofrice straw, cow excrement and wood bark.
Sawdust obtained from a lumber mill was predominantly Japanese cedar waste, and used assoil amendment in this study. Water content
and particle density of compost and sawdust
was *.1/ kg kgῌ+, ,.1* Mg mῌ- and *..- kg kgῌ+,,. +5+.1+ Mg mῌ-, respectively. Rice straw (Japonica)
was collected from the farm at Takizawa, aneighboring village of Morioka. Straw was airdried and then cut into +ῌ, cm pieces. The
values of water content and particle density ofrice straw were *.+3 kg kgῌ+ and +.0* Mg mῌ-.
Water content was measured on dry-weightbasis.
All soil amendments using compost, sawdust
and rice straw were applied on apparent soilvolume basis and spread manually over eachamendment treatment plot. The amendment
volume was calculated for each plot by multiplying the plot area with a constant incorporation plow depth of +/ cm. Amendments wereapplied on a random basis to all nine treatment
plots. Each of compost, sawdust and straw incorporated amendments was applied to threetreatment plots. Three application rates expressed as *.+, *., and *.- m- mῌ- of the soil volume (apparent) were assigned to these threetreatment plots of each amendment, respectively. Brieﬂy, we calculated the apparent soilvolume of each plot by multiplying the area tothe depth of incorporation. Then we incorporated each biomass (volume basis) to the *.*, *.+,*., and *.- m- mῌ- of apparent soil volume ofeach plot. A small tractor implemented with arotavator was used to incorporate amendments
into the top +/ cm of the soil proﬁle. The nonamendment control plot was also tilled to thesame soil depth as the treatment plots. As ourstudy was limited to the changes of physicaland hydraulic properties due to compost, sawdust and straw amendment, therefore, we did
not investigate crop yield response to theseamendments.
,. - Measurement of Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties
Bulk density for all plots was determinedfrom soil core samples. Samples were collectedfrom top / cm of each plot, by commercial coresamplers of / cm diameter, and /.+ cm in length.
However, for each plot bulk density were notmeasured for several sample series. Collected
samples were dried in a force-vent oven at +*/6 for ,. h and dry weights were recorded forbulk density computations. In-situ soil resistance was measured for each plot within the top/ cm soil depth using a Yamanaka hand-heldcone penetrometer, and measurements weretaken at ﬁve points following on a circulararray. For each plot, changes in the phase composition of soil matrix were estimated fromcollected undisturbed soil cores. Approximately + cm of the topsoil was scraped and one undisturbed core was taken at the top 0 cm soil
depth for each plot. Disturbed soil samples
were also collected at the same time for gravimetric water content measurements. Collected
samples were weighted immediately and wereoven-dried for determining the solid mass. The
mass of solid, water and amendments were
estimated for +** cm- total soil sample using
the average water content obtained from disturbed soil samples. This mass weight wasconverted to volume proportion of solid, waterand organic amendments by using the particle
density of soil amendments mixture. Subtracting the volume of solid, water and amendmentsfrom the total sample volume of +** cm- resulted in an estimate of the gas phase volume.
The volume proportion of solid, water, gas andamendments was then converted into percentage.
In this study, the near-saturated hydraulicconductivity was determined for all plots. A
disc permeameter (Perroux and White, +322)
was used for in-situ measurements of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, referred to as K(h) (cm s+),where h is the suction (cm). The
advantage of disc permeameter is that, the instrument is relatively simple, minimal disturbance of soil and in situ estimation of hydraulicconductivity is possible at or near saturated
condition. The disc permeameter consisted of areservoir tower, a bubble tower with movableair-entry point and a disc (,* cm in diameter),covered with a highly permeable nylon membrane. The air-entry tube allowed to impose
the constant pressure head conditions with apressure head being below the atmospheric+*1  ,**1

pressure. A thin layer of highly permeable
coarse sand was used to ensure good hydrauliccontact between the disc and the soil. Since
removal of surface crust, soil clods and roots
from the soil surface was reported e#ective forachieving a leveled surface for tension inﬁltrometer (Ankeney, +33,), the top + cm soil was
removed before the measurement of inﬁltration. Inﬁltration was recorded by measuring
the water level drop in the reservoir for a sequence of preset time step. The time step was
set at +/ seconds for few initial readings and at
the end water levels in the reservoir tower
were recorded for every /-minute intervals
until the steady state condition was attained.
Steady state ﬂow rates, Q (cm- s+), were determined for successive suctions of 2, ., ,
cm and 0 mm of water, because these suctions
were reported to be best for describing biological activities in soils (White et al., +33, ; Murphy et al., +33-). However, as the suctions approached close to saturation it was very di$cult to notice, because the steady state condition prevailed during very short run time.
Therefore, data observed at suctions of , cm
and 0 mm of water were not presented in thisstudy.
The K (h) was determined using steady state
ﬂow data from the disc permeameter under thedi#erent suctions applied (Reynolds and Elrick, +33+). According to their study, the piecewise slope and intercept can be described by :axylnQxῌQy
hxhyῌ

Kxy

GdaxyQxr+GdaxyprQxῌQyP

῍

where Phx/(hxhy) ; Kxy is the piecewise intercept (cm s+) ; axy (cm+) is the piecewiseslope of the plots of lnQ against h ; Q is the ﬂow
rate (cm- s+) ; Gd is the dimensionless shapefactor for tension inﬁltration from a surface
disc and is equal to *.,/ ; and r is the radius of
the disc (cm). The values x (+, ,, -, - - -) and y(x+) are integers, which are used to denotepiecewise sequences. By assuming a simple

ῑῐ : Field Evaluation of Compost, Sawdust and Rice Straw Biomass on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties

exponential relationship between the hydraulic conductivity and pressure head (Gardner,+3/2), the K (h) is given by :Kῌh῍῏Kxyexpῌaxyh῍ῌThe K (h) was calculated as the average of ῎2and ῎. cm of water of applied suctions. SteadyState ﬂow rate (Q) for each suctions were ob-

7tained as the slope of the curve of cumulative
inﬁltration volume versus elapsed time, whichis shown in Fig. +. Assuming that the sorptive
number a is constant over the interval between
the two successive suctions, the piecewise linear regression analysis were carried out whichis shown in Fig. ,. The slope and intercept
value of piecewise regression plot were taken

Fig. +

Cumulative inﬁltration at successive supply pressure head measured at each treatment plotusing disc permeameter. Steady state ﬂow rate (Q) is taken as slope of the linear portion of
the curve.

Fig. ,Natural logarithm of steady state ﬂow rate (Q) versus supply pressure head (h) for obtaining the a based on the piecewise exponential relationship expressed in the Eq.-. The
values of a and Kxy in Eq.- are the slope and intercept of two successive pressure heads,
respectively.



8

as equal to the value of axy and Kxy in Eq.+ andEq.,. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, K(h) were calculated using Eq.- as the average of2 and . cm of water of applied suctions.
Soil water retention characteristics for eachplot were determined from the undisturbed
core samples (/.+ cm length and /.* cm diameter) using the hanging water column and centrifuge method. It is to be mentioned that, water retention characteristics were not measured
for several sample series. Saturated cores weretransferred to the hanging water column andplaced on a porous ceramic plate. Lowering ahanging water column connected to the plate
induced a step change in suction at the bottomof the plate. The water column was setup as
lower as at ../ cm, /*.+ cm and 30.* cm measured
from the mid-point of the sample. High suctions such as /.*+*,, +.*+*- and ,./+*- cm
were applied by centrifuge and suctions at -.+0
+*/ and +.*+*1 cm were taken as air dry andoven dry condition. Volumetric water content
at fully saturated condition was calculated
from the three-phase composition such that thesoil matrix is perfectly saturated with water,
and then assumed as * cm suction. So the air
volume at each mixing level was assumed to be
zero and the volumetric soil water content wascalculated by subtracting the solid volume
from the total volume.
-.

+*1

,**1

Fig. -

Soil three-phase composition of compost incorporated plots at *.+, *., and *.- m- mῌ- ofapparent soil volume

Fig. .

Soil three-phase composition of sawdust incorporated plots at *.+, *., and *.- m- mῌ- ofapparent soil volume

Fig. /

Soil three-phase composition of straw incorporated plots at *.+, *., and *.- m- mῌ- ofapparent soil volume

Results and Discussion-. + Three-Phase Composition of Soil
Compared to the non-amended control plot
(represented by *.* application rate), soil threephase compositions (solid, water and air) ofcompost, sawdust and rice straw amended
plots incorporated at application rates of *.+, *.,and *.- m- m- (volume basis) were shown in
Fig. -, Fig. . and Fig. /, respectively. Despite
application rates of compost, sawdust andstraw incorporation, the soil phase composition, as shown in Figs. -ῌ/, generally changed
in all amended treatment plots compared to thecontrol. However, the most distinct change ofsolid, water and air phases was observed incompost incorporated amended plots. The solid phase was markedly reduced with the application rate of compost incorporation (Fig. -)ῑῐ : Field Evaluation of Compost, Sawdust and Rice Straw Biomass on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties

For compost, application rate at *.- m- m῏yields ,.,*ῌ composition of the total volume.
At this application rate the solid phase reduced
up to /.0*ῌ, while the air phase increases to
1.0.ῌ (Fig. -). This may be attributed to thecomposition of compost, which was made ofstraw, cow excrement and wood bark. Generally cow excrement is more decomposable thanstraw and wood bark ; as a result it may leavea blend of ﬁbrous materials that occupies morepore space.
Sawdust amended at *.+, *., and *.- m- m῏-,
shown in Fig. ., indicated the similar trend ascompost incorporations. However, the reduction of the soil solid phase at *.- m- m῏- level ofincorporation was slightly less. The *.- m- m῏of sawdust incorporation corresponded to ,.*,
ῌ of the total volume, which causes /.+0ῌ
reduction in the soil solid phase. The air phaseof sawdust-amended soils also increases to /.0,
ῌ compared to the control plot. For straw
amendments, the trend of phase changes varied abruptly at di#erent level of incorporation.
As shown in Fig. /, the soil solid phase decreased by ,./*ῌ (from .*.0ῌ to -2.+ῌ) at *.+ mm῏- incorporation level ; remained almost constant (.*.0ῌ to .*.-ῌ) at *., m- m῏- and thenreduced to /.+*ῌ (from .*.0ῌ to -/./ῌ) at *.- mm῏- level of straw incorporation.
-. , Soil Resistance and Bulk Density
Table + showed values of soil resistance andbulk density at di#erent level of compost, sawdust and straw amendment. Soil resistanceand bulk density generally decreased due tocompost, sawdust and straw amendments,

Table +

compared to the non-amended soil. Averagesoil resistance decreased from /1, kPa to -10
kPa, and bulk density decreased from +.,* Mgm῏- to *.3/ Mg m῏- as a#ected by the incorporation of *.+ m- m῏- compost (Table +). Similarly,
soil resistance and bulk density for the incorporation of *.- m- m῏- compost decreased sharply to 20.* kPa and *.2. Mg m῏-, respectively,
compared with the control plot.
Soil resistance and bulk density did notdecreased gradually for di#erent level of sawdust incorporation (Table +), compared to thecontrol plot. For instance, both soil resistanceand bulk density decreased to ,22 kPa and +.*0
Mg m῏- at *.+ m- m῏- sawdust, and to +*3 kPa
and *.2. Mg m῏- at *., m- m῏- sawdust incorporations, respectively. On the contrary, soil resistance and bulk density increased to -10 kPa
and *.32 Mg m῏-, respectively, for the additionof *.- m- m῏- sawdust. As shown in Table +, addition of straw at any level, sharply decreased
soil resistance and bulk density. For instance,
both soil resistance and bulk density decreased
to 01./ kPa and *.1- Mg m῏-, respectively, at of*.- m- m῏- incorporation level.
Figures 0, 1 and 2 showed the relationships
between soil resistance and bulk density for all
treatment plots derived from simple linear regression analysis, indicating a good correlation
between soil resistance and bulk density at all
applied amendments. For compost and straw
amendments soil resistance decreased gradually with the decrease in bulk density at any
level of incorporation. However, sawdust incorporated at *., m- m῏- application rate re-

Average soil resistance and bulk density for compost, sawdust, and straw incorporation

Application
rate (ῌ)

*
+*
,*
-*

9

Bulk density (Mg m῏-)

Soil resistance (kPa)
ControlCompostSawdustStraw

ControlCompostSawdustStraw/1, ῍014*῎ῌῌῌῌ-10 ῍2-40῎++0 ῍1-4-῎
204* ῍--4*῎ῌ
,22 ῍1+4*῎+*3 ῍-+4*῎-10 ῍2.4*῎ῌ.** ῍+1*῎
134* ῍+*4*῎
014/ ῍,04*῎

+4,
ῌ
ῌ
ῌ

ῌ
*43/
*43,
*42.

ῌ
+4*0
*42.
*432

ῌ
*432
*43*
*41-

Values in parentheses are standard deviation of the sample meanΐῐ῎῔῕ῑ ῒ +*1 ῏ ῌ,**1῍

10Fig. 0Relationship between soil resistance and bulk density for compost amended
soils incorporated at application rates of *.+, *., and *.- m- mῌ-.

Fig. 1

Relationship between soil resistance and bulk density for sawdust amended
soils incorporated at application rates of *.+, *., and *.- m- mῌ-.

Fig. 2

Relationship between soil resistance and bulk density for rice straw amended
soils incorporated at application rates of *.+, *., and *.- m- mῌ-.

῏῎ : Field Evaluation of Compost, Sawdust and Rice Straw Biomass on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties 11

sulted the maximum reduction in soil resistance and bulk density values compared toother *.+ m- mῌ- and *.- m- mῌ- of sawdust incorporations. Relatively better correlation (R,῍*.1+.2) between soil resistance and bulk density obtained for straw amended soils. Variations in the reduction of soil resistance andbulk density values for compost, straw andsawdust amended soils may be explained fromthe changes of their phase compositions at
di#erent level of incorporations (section -. +).
Bulk density is inversely proportional to total
porosity (Carter and Ball, +33-), which provides
a measure of the total pore space left in the soil
for air and water movement. Lower bulk density generally reduces the soil resistance because of relatively less unconﬁned compressive
strength of the soil. The reduction in the solid
phase at any level of compost, sawdust andstraw incorporations was higher than the nonamended control soils. The decrease in solid
phase increased the air phase resulted a subsequent increase in total porosity. For instance,at *.- m- mῌ- additions as compost, sawdust
and straw incorporations reduced soil solid
phases by /.0*, ..*2 and /.+0ῌ, and thereby
increasing the total porosity by ., - and .ῌ,respectively. In addition, decomposition rates

Fig. 3of these biomasses may be a reason of variablesoil resistance and bulk density of amended
soils, which is evident in sawdust amendments.
-. - Near-Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
The e#ect of compost, sawdust and straw
incorporations on near-saturated hydraulic conductivity, K (h), was shown in Fig. 3. Since thesimilar trend was observed under di#erent applied suctions, the e#ect of compost, sawdust
and straw incorporation on near-saturated hydraulic conductivity, K (h), at ῌ0 cm of watersuction (average of ῌ2 and ῌ. cm suction) was
demonstratively shown. The ability of soil totransmit water depends on the porosity andthe arrangement of soil particles. Addition oforganic amendments usually leads to an increase in soil aggregation and porosity, therefore, K (h) is expected to be greater in organic
matter amended soils. As shown in Fig. 3, bothcompost and straw incorporations increased K(h) remarkably at di#erent application rates
though signiﬁcant di#erence in data among
treatment variables were not tested. For compost amended soils, the K (h) sharply increased
to ,/.. cm dῌ+ at level of *.+ m- mῌ- incorporation and then gradually increased to maximum.*.. cm dῌ+ at *.- m- mῌ- addition (compared toE#ect of the di#erent incorporation rates of compost, sawdust and straw
amendments on the near-saturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil, K (h),observed at a suction of 0 cm of water.

12

the non-amended control plot). Straw incorporations showed the similar trends. Comparedto the control plot, a steep increase of the K (h)was observed at *.+ m- m- straw incorporation(+2.- cm d+) and then exhibited the maximum--./ cm d+ at *.- m- m- incorporation. In contrast, the trends of the K (h) increments withincreasing sawdust additions were not consistent. As shown in Fig. 3, the K (h) gradually
increased from 0.+* cm d+ (control plot) to 3..*and to +-.- cm d+ at *.+ m- m- and *., m- mincorporation levels, respectively, and thensuddenly decreased to /..* cm d+ at *.- m- mincorporation level. This sudden decrease in
the K (h) for sawdust amended soil at higher
application rate may be attributed to either
measurement error or at higher rate appliedand suspended solids or microorganisms which
may likely to block the water conducting pores(McAuli#e at al., +32, ; Lehrsch et al., +330).
Notably, as shown in Fig. 3, K (h) values forsawdust amended soils was also lower thancompost and straw amended soils incorporated
at *.+ m- m- and *., m- m- rates.
Incorporations of compost, sawdust andstraw to soils generally decreased the solid
phase and increased the water and gas phase(Fig. -, Fig. ., and Fig. /, respectively). Hence,
the total porosity increased with the increase
in incorporation rates. The increase in the total
porosity might have an e#ect on the increasing
trend of the K (h) for compost, straw and sawdust amended soils. As water ﬂow rates in soil
pores (cylindrical) is proportional to the fourth
power of the radius, near saturated porosity
would account for most of the water movement in unsaturated condition (Brady, +31.).
The total porosity ratio for compost, straw andsawdust amended soils at *.- m- m- incorporation was +.*0, +.*/ and +.*0, respectively, compared with control plot. At the same level ofincorporation, the K (h) increased by 0.0, /./ and*.3 times than non amended soil, thus indicating that the K (h) change was much higher thanthe porosity expansion. Therefore, it is clearthat the e#ect of organic matter incorporations

+*1

,**1

on the K (h) may be attributed to the porosity
along with pore radius expansion.
-. . Soil Water Retention Characteristics
Soil water retention curves for di#erent application rates of compost, sawdust and straw
amended soils compared to the control plot
were presented in Fig. +*, Fig. ++, and Fig. +,,respectively. Compared to the control plot,
compost incorporation at higher application
rate retained larger amount of water than sawdust and straw. For instance, the *.- m- mincorporation of compost caused *.*0 m- m(from *..1 m- m- to *./- m- m-) increase in water content at a low suction (at ../ cm) ; remained almost constant at *.*/ m- m- (from *.-/ mm- to *..* m- m-) at /.*+*, cm suction, andthen increased to *.+. m- m- (from *.+/ m- mto *.,3 m- m-) at -.+0+*/ cm suction (Fig. +*).
However, sawdust incorporation e#ect waslimited to relatively at low suction. As shownin Fig. ++, at *.- m- m- sawdust incorporationlevel, water content increased by *.*. m- m(from *..2 m- m- to *./, m- m-) at ../ cm ; remained constant *.*. m- m- (*.-/ m- m- to *.-3m- m-) at /.*+*, cm and then decreased by*.*+ m- m- (*.+/ m- m- to *.+0 m- m-) at -.+0
+*/ cm suction. For straw amended soils (Fig.
+,) increments in water content was lower
than compost amended soils at higher suction.
However, at relatively lower suction, volumetric water content of straw and compost
amended soils were almost same. For instance,
addition of straw at the *.- m- m- incorporation level increased water content by *.*/ mm- at ../ cm, remained constant at *.*/ m- mat /.*+*, cm, and then increased to *.*0 m- mat -.+0+*/ cm suction, respectively.
The e#ect of compost, sawdust and straw
incorporations on changes in soil water retention behaviors may be explained from the capillary pore size and porosity expansion considerations of amended soils. Assuming that thesoil is behaving as a bundle of capillary tubes,
then capillarity would be su$cient to describe
the relationships between the capillary pressure head and soil pore radii. According to the῍ῌ : Field Evaluation of Compost, Sawdust and Rice Straw Biomass on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties 13

Fig. +*

Soil water retention curve of compost amended treatment plots at di#erent suctions.

Fig. ++

Soil water retention curve of sawdust amended treatment plots at di#erent suctions.

Fig. +,

Soil water retention curve of straw amended treatment plots at di#erent suctions.



14

Young-Laplace equation, the capillary pressure
head in a capillary tube is proportional to theheight of h above the free water surface andinversely proportional to the capillary radius r,which is given as follows :,gcosavῌgr+rgrwhere rg is the density of gas (generally neglected), r+ is the density of water, g is the surface tension, g is the acceleration due to gravity and av is the contact angle. The equivalentcapillary tube radius re at di#erent suctions
can be estimated using this Young-Laplace,such as re*.,. mm for ../ cm, and +../ mm for/.*+*, cm suction. However, at high suction
such as at -.+0+*/ cm, the equivalent capillaryradius drops down to ,.-/ nm, which is not an
actual capillary size but surface adsorption
scale that forms a hydration envelope over theparticle surface. As the soil was predominantly
clay in this study, the incorporation e#ect oforganic matters appears in ﬁne pore system ofnm scales, and enlarges its porosity to at least+.1.ῌ. The porosity expansion is also evident
from three-phase compositions of compost andsawdust amended soils (Fig. - and Fig. ., respectively), such that, the *.- m- m- incorporation caused -..*ῌ and -.+-ῌ increase in theporosity, respectively. In contrast, straw incorporation at the same *.- m- m- application rateincreased the porosity to ,.1.ῌ. Among threebiomasses incorporated to the clay soils in thisstudy, compost and sawdust amendments
showed an increase in capillary pore sizes ofthe soil.
hc..

Conclusion

The ﬁeld experiment conducted in this study
showed that additions of plant and composted
biomass such as compost, sawdust and ricestraw at di#erent application rates of *.+, *.,,and *.- m- m- (apparent soil volume basis) toclay loam soils led to a substantial improvement of soil physical and hydraulic properties.
The extent of their e#ectiveness for improving
soil physical and hydraulic properties was par-+*1

,**1

tially dependent on application rate ; in suchas way that higher application rate of thesebiomasses provided greater improvement insoil properties. Compared to the control plot,
three-phase compositions of compost, sawdust
and straw amended soils showed the reduction
in soil solid phases, and thereby increased thetotal porosity. Additions of all amendments
also decreased soil resistance and bulk density,
which were likely due to the reduction in solid
phases of amended soils. A good correlation
between soil resistance and bulk density wasobserved for all amended plots. Except forsawdust addition only at higher application
rate, near-saturated hydraulic conductivity, K(h), increased for all application rates of compost and straw incorporations. The incrementin the K (h) might be attributed to the reduction in solid phases of compost, sawdust andstraw amended soils and thus the increase in
the total porosity. Improvements in soil water
retention were varied among amendment
types and application rate. Compost amended
soils retained large amount of water even at
higher suctions. However, improvement in soil
water retention characteristics for sawdustamended soils was limited at lower suction.
For straw amended soils, water retention capacity increased steadily from low to high suction.
This ﬁeld study showed that compost, sawdust and straw had di#erent interactions to thebasic soil physical and hydraulic properties
when incorporated to clayey loam soil. Although di#erent agricultural practices andcrop yields under applied biomass incorporations have not been considered as indicators,
results concerned with the e#ect of incorporated compost, sawdust and straw biomass
amendments on soil physical and hydraulicproperties investigated and presented in thisstudy will extend our ideas for the e#ective application of these biomasses in order to improve soil quality.

῍ῌ : Field Evaluation of Compost, Sawdust and Rice Straw Biomass on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties 15

Acknowledgments
We would like to express our appreciation to
the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports andCulture, Japan for proving the scholarship,
which lead to this study.
References
Ankeny, M.D. (+33,) : Methods and theory for unconﬁned inﬁltration measurements. p. +,-ῌ+.,.
In G.C. Topp et al. (ed.) Advances in measurement of soil physical properties : Bringing theory into practice. SSSA, Madison, WI.
Bhagat, R.M. and Verma, T.S. (+33+) : E#ects of ricestraw management on soil physical properties
and wheat yield. Soil Sci., +/, : +*2ῌ++/.
Boyle, M., Frankenberger, Jr. W.T. and Stolzy, L.H.
(+323) : The inﬂuence of organic matter on soil
aggregation and water inﬁltration. J. Prod.
Agric., , : ,3*ῌ,33.
Brady, N.C. (+31.) : The nature and properties ofsoils. MacMillan Publ. Co., New York.
Carter, M.R. and Ball, B.C. (+33-) : Soil Porosity. p.
/2+ῌ/22. In M.R. Carter (ed.). Soil sampling
methods of soil analysis. Lewis Publ. Boca
Raton, FL.
Carter, M.R. and Stewart, B.A. (+330) : ‘Structure
and organic matter storage in agriculturalsoils.’ (CRC Press : Boca Raton.)
Carter, M.R., Gregorich, E.G., Angers, D.A., Donald,
R.G. and Bolinder, M.A. (+332) : Organic C andN storage and organic C fractions, in adjacentcultivated and forested soils of eastern Canada. Soil Tillage Res., .1 : ,/-ῌ,0+.
Debosz, K., Petersen, S.O., Kure, L.K. and Ambus, P.
(,**,) : Evaluating e#ects of sewage sludge
and house hold compost on soil physical,
chemical and microbiological properties. App.
Soil Ecol., +3 : ,-1ῌ,.2.
Epstein, E. (+31/) : E#ect of sewage sludge on some
soil physical properties. J. Environ. Qual., . :+-3ῌ+.,.
Epstein, E., Taylor, J.M. and Chaney, R.L. (+310) :E#ects of sewage sludge and sludge compost
applied to soil on some soil physical and chemical properties. J. Environ. Qual., / : .,,ῌ.,0.
Gupta, S.C., Dowdy, R.H. and Larson, W.E. (+311) :Hydraulic and thermal properties of a sandy
soil as inﬂuenced by incorporation of sewage
sludge. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., . : 0*+ῌ0*/.
Gardner, W.R. (+3/2) : Some steady-state solutionsof the unsaturated moisture ﬂow equation

with application to evaporation from a watertable. Soil Sci., 2/ : ,,2ῌ,-,.
Garnier, P., Ezzine, N., De Gryze, S. and Richard, G.
(,**.) : Hydraulic properties of soil-straw mixtures. Vadose Zone Journal, - : 1+.ῌ1,+.
Kay, B.D. (+332) : Soil structure and organic carbon : A review. p. +03ῌ+31. In R. Lal et al. (ed.)
Soil processes and the carbon cycle. CRC Press.
Boca Raton, FL.
Khaleel, R., Reddy, K.R. and Overcash, M.R. (+32+) :Changes in soil physical properties due to organic waste additions : A review. J. Environ.
Qual., +* : +--ῌ+.+.
Lehrsch, G.A. and Robbins, C.W. (+330) : Cheese
whey e#ects on surface soil hydraulic properties. Soil Use & Management., +, : ,*/ῌ,*2.
Lindsay, B. J. and Logan, T. J. (+332) : Field response of soil physical properties to sewage
sludge. J. Environ. Qual., ,1 : /-.ῌ/.,.
McAullife, K.W., Scotter, D.R., Macgregor, A.N. andEari, K.D. (+32,) : Casien whey waste water
e#ect on soil permeability. J. Environ. Qual.,++ : -+ῌ-..
Mandal, K.G., Misra, A.K., Hati, K.M., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Ghosh, P.K. and Manoranjan, M.
(,**.) : Rise Residue-management options ande#ects on soil properties and crop productivity. Food, Agriculture & Environment, , (+) :,,.ῌ,-+.
Martens, D.A. and Frankenberger, Jr, W.T. (+33,) :Modiﬁcation of inﬁltration rates in an organicamended irrigated soil. Agron., J. 2. : 1*1ῌ1+1.
Miller, J. J., Sweetland, N. J. and Chang, C. (,**,) :Hydrological properties of a clay loam soil
after long-term cattle manure application. J.
Environ. Qual., -+ : 323ῌ330.
Murphy, B.W., Koen, T.B., Jones, B.A. and Huxedurp, L.M. (+33-) : Temporal variation of hydraulic properties for some soils with fragile
structures. Australian Journal of Soil Research, -+ : +13ῌ+31.
Oades, J.M. (+32.) : Soil organic matter and structural stability : Mechanisms and implication
for management. Plant Soil, 10 : -+3ῌ--1.
Pagliai, M., Marca, La M. and Lucamante, G. (+321) :Changes in soil porosity in remolded soils
treated with poultry manure. Soil Sci., +.. :+,2ῌ+.*.
Perroux, K.M. and White, I. (+322) : Design for discpermeameters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., /, : +,*/ῌ
+,+/.
Rawls, W. J., Pachepsky, Y.A., Ritchie, J.C., Sobecki,
T.M. and Bloodworth, H. (,**-) : E#ect of soilorganic carbon on soil water retention. Geo-76ºH » +*1 ¼ W,**1[

16

darma, +0 : 0+ῌ10.
Reynolds, W.D. and Elrick, D.E. (+33+) : Determination of hydraulic conductivity using a tension
inﬁltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., // : 0--ῌ0-3.
Schjonning, P., Christensen, B.T. and Carstensen, B.
(+33.) : Physical and chemical properties of asandy loam receiving animal manure, mineral
fertilizer or no fertilizer for 3* years. Eur. J.
Soil Sci., ./ : ,/1ῌ,02.
Schjonning, P., Munkholm, L. J., Moldrup, P. andJacobsen, O.H. (,**,) : Modelling soil porecharacteristics from measurements of air exchange : the long-term e#ects of fertilizationand crop rotation. Eur. J. Soil Sci., /- : --+ῌ--3.
Schjonning, P., Iversen, B.V., Munkholm, L. J., Labouriau, R. and Jacobsen, O.H. (,**/) : Soil Use

and Management , ,+ : ,0/ῌ,1/.
Tisdall, J.M. and J. M. Oades. (+32,) : Organic matter and water stable aggregate in soils. J. Soil
Sci., -- : +.+ῌ+0-.
Wei, Q.F., Lowery, B. and Peterson, A.E. (+32/) :E#ect of sludge application on physical properties of a silty clay loam. J. Environ. Qual.,+. : 12ῌ+2*.
White, I., Sully, M. J. and Perroux, K.M. (+33,) :Measurement of surface-soil hydraulic properties : disc permeameter, tension inﬁltrometers and other techniques. In ‘Advances inmeasurement of soil properties : bringing theory in practice’. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication No. -*. pp. 03ῌ+*-. (Soil
Science Society of America, Madison, WI)
ῌ
 !"#$%&  *ῌ **ῌ***  *,*ῌ2//* !"# -ῌ+2ῌ2** $ *,*ῌ2//* !"# -ῌ+2ῌ2'(%& ' () *+,-./0 1 23456789:;<-= >?@76ABCDEF GHIJGH8KLMNO4PQR8ST;<U V5 WXYZX7[ 8\]^6_`ab +* : + +* : , +* : - -cde/8f234M=ghiU 9:;j + kl mno],f - p
6q4 +** cc rst8juv; wGxJGqQ6l yz {|8e}GC~H4
<U <fC6F4 .j q6ABCD- F4<U   nob67EF4
EF8e}<UmR8 0 1 2369:8e}mnob7EF- F; >?q6B
8ed>-@C]<U <7EF- F68 .B@\,?<U JG
8.j (65 9: 6¡¢8£¤j¡;<U >?B 68¥¦Md6-§¨,?dU © 68e}GC~HNO4ª^ _`«G ¡¢;<U <i;¬6w­6®
F-¯°236±8e}²cd6b³<U)*+*, : 0 1  76ABCD 7EF- F ´b6JG 7GCrXµ¶
ª·k¸¹ : ,**1 k + ¸ ,. ¹ªk¸¹ : ,**1 k 0 ¸ ++ ¹
J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
?1
No. +*1, p. +1 ,0 ,**1



 !"#$ % &*ῌ**ῌ*ῌ *Analysis on Hydrological Aspects of Shallow Groundwaterin a Catchment with an Agricultural ToposequenceAn Implication for a Risk Assessment of Excess Nutrient
Discharge to Surrounding Water Body
Ippei IIYAMA*, Kenji MATSUMORI**, Hideshi FUJIWARA* and Yasuhiro NAKAJIMA** National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Kannondai -ῌ+ῌ-,
Tsukuba, Ibaraki, -*/ῌ20*., Japan** National Institute for Rural Engineering, Kannondai ,ῌ+ῌ0, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, -*/ῌ20*3, Japan
Abstract
In a series of agricultural land uses over a toposequence comprised of upland crop ﬁelds andlowland paddy ﬁelds, hydrological aspects are essential to an understanding of impacts ofagricultural managements on groundwater environment. The objective of this study was toevaluate amounts and ﬂow paths of shallow groundwater discharging from an agricultural
catchment using a physical model.
About 0+῍ of the shallow groundwater percolated into the deeper aquifer and exited thecatchment without passing through the paddy ﬁelds.

Only the rest of the shallow groundwater,which was within 1* m of the paddy ﬁelds, reached the paddy ﬁelds after +. years of travel.
These results indicated that in a convergent-shaped catchment a large part of leached nutrientsfrom upper crop ﬁelds can leave the catchment without being consumed in lowland paddy ﬁeld
area.
We deﬁned a risk of excess nutrient discharge from the catchment as a probability that 3/῍ ofthe recharged groundwater bypasses the paddy ﬁelds, assuming that the most inﬂuential parameter falls within an uncertainty range of two orders of magnitude around the value giving themodel’s deterministic solution. The evaluated risk came to ...2῍ even when the uncertainty
range would include 33῍ of the whole population of the parameter.
Key words : nitrate nitrogen, physical model, parameter uncertainty, shallow groundwater,
toposequence+    EFGHI@JKLM<N. /OP
:0QRSTU$V; AW=. /01XY-Z !"#$%&'[\]^@\]_`56aNb@c. GH()*+,-. /012345637489

I:defgRhijkNl. [6kNmnRo

:; <=. >?@AB'"#CD-.

pNlqer'$TUL:;* s tuvwx y-*/ῌ20*. z{|}~ -ῌ+ῌ** Ovwx y-*/ῌ20*3 z{|}~ ,ῌ+ῌ0 : 1 . ?qer. fg1. EF. k A ` +*1 µ ,**1

18 NO--N     

!

Hedin et al., +332 &' NO--N

"#$%

()

, 

 *+%,-. /0,+Cr  stuvwxv1 yD
1; 

z{ |E}@-,.+ ha

q2 +*~+* m12 Hill, +330 + 3$'4fW,

FG/HI8i 567, UJH

F K9JHTqH NO--N ()8'29:  Bohlker and Denver, +33/ ;LJHq M*^, ῌ+;

Devito et al., ,*** ; Hill et al., ,*** &%,/./ m 1C,;

;

/ C
FG/ +/.0

FKN -.+῍  +/.-῍

1C,; G/ ,*,/ m  O  '<=

!" >? # $@AB O-PQ$%,; G/ +2 m

%6 &'(6C, )*$%   ./ 12> D + (EF  G,H-,;F R 8^./  IJK0$% A1ῌLM +32. ;,,2N +33- 67; .

NO--N ()34 5OP 8.\ k8  ¡¢ q2-£yH

Q .6 +32- ; .6 +321 ; .6 +330 '^,; +¤ ¥¦§ ST i¨5U ©yH^ ª

OPQ .6ῌR. +33+ 67 S7$%T2 «of +1

:;<]^_ `ab# =cK0$%;++ ±-k-£X²^ ῌ,V

°^,W 
q

HI^

,;

d&"> + (EFA
-V Tq¬­ +*1

qCr®¯8i -£ ^,; ῌ+UV* ,W XYQZ8[$% .6+332; \9  TeG,Hῌ- ++ ±- k-£ . -£8Y k

Ufgh<] i?^ j@ kAlm

8°^,; ῌ, 

nop8B'^,AXYQ q2  :8`[^&'a^,;2 &% . -£8 ++ -£ ] S^^,; k
yHῌ+Fig. +

Cr_º\++ -£ ³%,k 8Z

FD

Te\

]



',´µ !"¶·¸o!¹ +331

Tq

*»¼

Location of the study site and the deﬁnition of the catchment.

q

@A : B C¸¹a bd>º)

A:T»¼

19

A 4 ,Bw @ C ) ῍- D-Cg, )EF)" .Cg )1)IJ)" K

LMLNO P

GH+ EF)=%2 

@IJ QC;<) Cg ) Gr ) "R0
L .Cg ) SL2?
)T" >@R0L>1

UVW)9 X8 .Cg )YZ[\P]+,2 S \+^_L

Z"` +-./ m +, a

b

c

d

>S Z )e1 8X+,2 fg+
 hi$j2k8@Xa

b

.Cg )

l

m9` +-./ m +no p@,- 
ῌ,
Fig. ,ab

(!<®

 qrst8
 bSoil types in the catchment.

 W+ W, W- 

W++ + ῍+ (!u W,

vw +* cm]vw 2./ cm, c

PVC x9@ Z_ W+ W, W-  W++

KLML+ 0.+ -.-+.3 ,.* m +, ' PVC xy@ _0z W+  W, +x/0 +./ m {+ |+W-  W++ +x/0 +.* m {+ |+ KL

ML}W~ 9d   
2 +33/  3 /0 +331  ++ {+ +*  +

q/0

o

,2!

"9 +330  ++ /0+331  / {+  q/0

9!b#  $9%&Xa b'ld()  9&8X N8L?*+, 9-X0  $ ./ ! " " 
 0. Q/"R0L
_0 10L)2 3
49&8 56

 0῍+ 97 892

( :T ῍. 9J 9 ¡..3 kPa {+ ¢£;9 ¡.3 kPa {+ 2 KLML

ῌ-

a b
() ()¯
±²³´µ +331 ¶·®

- °a bS W+ W, W-  W++

.

ª

.

!"#$%&' ()*+,
A ) B )-./012 3456 78

9:4;<= 78>? @ABC ,9&8X§¨

(H
(ῌ
(H῎
©
H¡BKs
(t
(x ῍
(x ῏



 ῍+   ῍-< ¤7¥9 ¦ .

<7¥9 Y

Fig. - Soil horizons observed in the catchment.

  

(ῌ(H῎
H¡BKs
¡pªr
(y ῍
(y ῏

SS+ x  y : a b«T¬ H :ῌ= «L¬ t : ­m «L¬ S : > ?" «L- L¡-¬

B : .Cg )m «L¬ K s : 56

 «L- L¡,yz ºN » +*1 ¼ Q,**1R20

῍ῌ+ yz9HI
Table +

Saturated hydraulic conductivity values for soil horizons in the study site
(after Matsumori et al. +331).

Type +
Soilkshorizon
(m/d)
Ahp
Bw
,Bw
-Cg+
-Cg,
.Cg

Type 1Soil
kshorizon(m/d)+43*¹+*+-4-1¹+**,410¹+**+42+¹+*34/*¹+*/-4/.¹+*+ῌῌ.
Fig. .

r :  L L-

Ap
A,
BCg
.Cg

-41,¹+**.4.+¹+**-4/.¹+*,-4/.¹+*+yz9HI

Type +*
Soilkshorizon
(m/d)
Ap
,A
-A
-Gr
.Cg

LMNOP

Type ++
Soilkshorizon(m/d)-41,¹+**,4,/¹+**-4,2¹+**.4*0¹+*,-4/.¹+*+

Ap
Cg+
Cg,
,Gm
,Gr
-Gr
.Cg

34/*¹+**,4/3¹+**+4*.¹+**
1412¹+*240.¹+*.
24,3¹+*.
-4/.¹+*+Q¶·/ +331R¸

Soil water characteristic curves for soil horizons in the study site
(after Matsumori et al. +331).

T+ p : .Cg  ῍/

{i Q¶·/ +331R¸, L- L, T++T   ῌ !"#$

%&' +, ()*+ +33/ , 3 -./ +331 , +, -0
123$ S, B, Ks, p, r ' 45678
$

g 9 hiI`j$ k` lm93`nL S c8$
B ' .Cg  o<F ,. , p qrs$

HIt u +-./ m
Ks ' xyz9;vw# $
{i Qj῍+R 9|Q῍- }~R +W =6X [wfg$

S ' 9:;9<=>?@ABCD8

95t S {iy 

EF@;9G$F F 9HI JKSS`' VW:hLMNOP Q῍.R ./7S$ TU BCDVῌyu]=mlI

W=6X YLZ 9I[\$P]L

$yz ¡¢ £¤:¥/m¦SlI

ZI^_ 9HI LMNOP S`a L§¨© I@ ª«/ Q+33*R

Zbc$ d BCDVW;9G$F:­®@v6 ¯°/ Q+322Ra eGaLZ=6XGL`f¦¬ y ±m²$ y³ ´./y µ

T : UV¹ºz{PQ »1¼VW

῏ῌ/

VWC{Rµ¶!BC45῎P῏
BC45 ῏  n BC·[d<¸Fig. /

Discretization of the catchment withthe boundary conditions (I) and (II). n
indicates a normal outward coordinate
deﬁned at any point on the catchment
boundary.







῏ῌ0

e0 S® !jk^#, ® !b¸

Fig. 0 Comparisons of changes in numericallyreproduced groundwater levels (thinlines) with measured ones (thick lines).

 

 -Cg   .Cg !"#$%

&'()*+', !-. -Cg /01 !'2 !3,uvwx9 !&,BC45 ῎ z{D 78 P ῏
8:78 &"\.[78  , ;&p  .Cg 45.-6-3,,

7 89:;<=>?@A Cloke

et al., ,**- ; de Vos et al., ,**, ; Batelaan et al., ,**-'!& Batelaan et al. ,**-  BC-.D<=>?@ p BC-

21

EF

, ῐ/ ῎ |45 ῏ BC[ < n !&+ \. * 45=,45 >0?@&, rI* 45Hῌ Vd 7,

O7,q=rst)PBC45 0vM !'2GH ',῍pIaHJBWC{DEF-.&, &+ Oe

῍ KL a  !"# r  * M3, +33/ $++ N ,/ %-. +330 $ + N +3 %O W+ PQ+33/ $ 2 N

A-. 3 Nle08Bjk& V&R '+ S'(OT7, S, B, Ks0)&6-3, W++ "G - 6e0
!HE]!63,u6G3+ 8B45!&,

UVW9' *.***+, XdayJ+Y !'2)*,VWv I "63,6

W+ Z+, -[\.]^" /Il8#J#!&+l& I_`^#a p bcd, !MK&+uvwx9

 !'2 ¡¢£¤r  e0)fghi01d6-3,

 ', L¥¦§6¨©MªN«O¬P­®!-. e02jkl<m>nmo¯#¨O# °L¥¦§6QI

pq=rst!& VWuvwxy!z{3|!&#±¦§6*.#,!I<4)T7,!²³+ J#T7,<m>nmop}545 . 6e0~'+78960M3,!-. W+ W, W- P W++ 'a#- e0-. -* cm G3

',



.ῌ ῎

°

῍

ῐ0  e02jk¯´M!*  +*1  9,**1?

22

ῌῌ1Fig. 1

ῌῌ2
Fig. 2+330 l ++ mq +331 l / m!1QS |XVQ 9a? > 9b? X W+W- N>

Simulated ﬂow paths of the shallow groundwater in the study site. (a) Horizontal section over the study site. (b) Vertical section along the line passing
through W+, W, and W-.

 W+  W,  .Cg  W-  W++  Cg

WXV 

Spring water discharge rate in the period from November +330 to May +331.
Circles denote the measured data while the thin line shows the predicted one.

  S  .Cg

 Cg 
#$%& '(

 W- !">ῌ1  1QRS!TUVWXV!"#Y- WXV Z[!\] ^_8 `ab('>cdTTU-1QRS ef! / m-ῌd)!*+ W- ,-./0

ghi!jPk +330 l ++ mno  +331 l - m

123405678 9:; /. <=!>ῌ2 9a??

poq . mno!rstui!vwxy z{W@;ABC DEFGHIJ( KL W- !
4MNOP%&)-Xu|X}  ~-1R40 W

!1340  !=789>ῌ

qJ : rs»¼^ Y12 ῌ,+"12%&   +332 6¹

Table ,

Time-averaged velocities of the shallow groundwater ﬂow at the four measurement wells. (a measured value wasfrom Matsumori et al. (+332)).
W+

W,

W-

P 
^

JKL

23

167

bG  6Y

YHIJKL

M

GLb{Qf Q P<jR Nc P<jR O
P8bkl ῏ ,ῐ/ iQWRR O
P86xSZT&UKVxQW?
1 5  X^ Y1?xf]&b
YHQfMean (m/d)
14+,+*. 34+1+*- ,41-+*,
S.D. (m/d),4*++*. ,4/-+*- +4+-+*,
C.V.
*4,2,
*4,10
*4.+Measured* (m/d) º/403+*º*  +332

,ῐ2 b  W+ W, W- \M EP8,  W+ W, W-  &
Z\ 6\? >R & R 
 " t8HIW]&B&gdf/, 

Z[-

 RC

0+ῌ 

'*Yi.P<

jRW &F Z ] F\2 a

ῐ,    
 3.+1+*- m ῌ d  W, /.01+*- 

/+  ()* 

&bHI?,,ῐ3 a
!"#$%& '+"    ,ῐ2 !"#<jR 

R = R

&\ ] dQ S

/ 0123   4 5 ῍

wQ¢.]xC   89& .CgS  *.+ c

Z , c -: bwQ¢ B st R£P

KL§

p 167 89 :; . <=>  \ ¡

$%& '()*  -. !"#$%&?@A B?_ZQW`b.[W B] -. 5 ῌ e ]^ S, Ks, p, r h? ,ῐ0 a & 0mῌd  +332 / W ]^

- o&x¤¥¦bw ,ῐ. .Cg¨ $bd? !3 b B st R O

P8bbwZ\]&6,ῐ3 b ¡

 .Cg 89

4 3  D?@A EC 

Ks  *.+ cZ +* c -: bd P<j5῍RCb Kse©fgyª =p 33  - F&D?@A <=>

! 89"# G%!3  ,ῐ.

H)IJ(KLMNO* * $% PQC  &?"R ST&U V'()W

X '*YZ 1* m +, -:.[ /0!

167

RC&x 

P<jRC>«\ Ks

RC+* c+,&e©6R6

R h¬b^ Y  GD Q¢ B

st P<jCb5 ῍ ­\?gy,ῐ3 c p W5 ῍

89 a  , ®¯b" +. 1+, \ 6\? ] ^ Y 23

wQ¢ 89 a

_4`5

89&? p be©W8Z °xTZ\ a

6ab .Cgf&gdf -; ῌ .Cg78cd?P*YZ

e9:Q- h Rie P<jR ῍ kl ῏ ZR ῎ = RBfmf+"  &]n ῌ  ++.*2 m-ῌd - o>

0+ῌ p qr?@ ῍  ,.+- m-ῌd +,ῌ ῎  ..32 m-ῌd ,1ῌ

a ij. cZ / c&= RC 

RC&x * k P<jRCbNc,ῐ3 d  
,

l4C r

st  r-23..- mmῌyrbwmWRC+" 

\ - h R  re©&&

xn?e©b B ,X i±\]f stZ ^ Y  
Au_4`5 6a ] ^ YW]&bBa 23CB xb

RKLe  ]e23
'*Y vw

Dybz&{

Qf ?! ^ Y| }E ~e F?DZ\ r¶ Cbb` o²³ ´µ -* 1" 1"m·+"   +*,/ mmῌyr*.1 cZ

 +.2 c -:\]&¸g ]fpqW-:&?

*.,/ cZ ,.* cHIº» \ R +*1 ¼ i,**1j

24

ῌ3

 - ° ±²³ iaj 4 ibj .Cg 9¤4´e icj ¢£¤´e
idj ³  Z<7 [¥I4  A, + !$%µ A³

Fig. 3

Sensitivities of the model outputs to the changes in such input parameters as(a) speciﬁc yield S, (b) saturated hydraulic conductivity Ks of .Cg horizon, (c)percolation coe$cient a in eq.(,) and (d) recharge r. Horizontal axis of graphs
show the ratios of the parameter values to those determined through reproducing the measured groundwater level changes.

   ῌ 

/-



   ῍



a !"#$%&



 


34567%89 4:5,;< 
=>?@A,BCD  !EF$G H$%&
IJ  KLMNA!$G O3/ῌP ,QE$ RS'TU!$G ()JVWX  ?Y
Z!"#67% a

D[\ ], ^ _`$%&

3b,cDmP& n gEJ  Oa

3b

ekl

 A,!< f opNAqrst$ uZP ! Q -vp A op
x,yuz{!$G%& |$G iiij Oa
G$% ῐ0ekl,gE$}~  /. , )J-A!$
I4



7%A

3b,cD῎

D[\5, Oa * ,!$% ,  a3b Jn=> a , I

D[\



EF$

%&
῎῍ῐ῍

a ΐ
῔ fiajda῏῍ῌ῎ῐ῍

 a ? *.2* *.3/ *.33|77Z%& 

IJE$% ῎ ,p a ,ῐ3 icj

G

$ 345J$G

, mmῌday¡C%&O¢£¤?

3/ῌ  ND P[¥I4
mmῌyr¦§J%~ -23..-

3/ῌ  ¨ῐ+*©ª, p«+.*+ mmῌ

day J$%A ¬$u a ? *.2* *.3/ *.33­>

J|77 1,.* /0.3 ...2ῌ J@%& G a3b i a* !cj J@P&

gE iij h iiij  a

5

ῐ+*

de fZG I, f gE,hZ%& iij Oa

Nw|$G a P !EF$ a'  () *+,-  ./ 012,

a< ade,I Jc$%&῎
fiaj¶
exp·¸iloga¸a*j,ῌ,s,¹῕῏ῑ ῒῐ

2* 3/ 33ῌ ? D[\5 ­> ®¯D|77 1,.* /0.3 ...2ῌ J@

/0 : IJKMNOPQ _`IaNN0%.bc

ῌ+*Fig. +*

rso p º-» 2*ῌ$ª«k25?@;¶ p ·¸ *.+p*¹p¹+*p*  º+» 33ῌ º,» 3/ῌ89¶ p* % a* 1¼¶

Probability density functions for deep percolation rate p which takes values
between *.+p* and +*p* with probabilities of (+) 33ῌ, (,) 3/ῌ and (-) 2*ῌ. p*corresponds to a*.

      !
"#$% &'()* +, a  -./,¬­$;bc-7H  -N®¬­¯°

0123+ ! 4'56307 89% :±² NEC SX-2 P4 SGI Altix-1** 0³.ῌ 0;0<;=>?@; +´,[ µ+ !

: ῍ A

C(DE+,FG

B;0;4



H !

Batelaan, O., De Smedt, F. and Triest, L. (,**-) : Re-0    gional groundwater discharge : phreatophyte

IJKLMNOPQ RSTU0

mapping, groundwater modeling and impact

5 + -VWXYZ[ \]analysis of land-use change. Journal of Hydrolo-^4_`IaN0bc+ "ade0 !

gy, ,1/ : 20῎+*2.

bcf gf Nhijk glm

Bohlker, J.K. and Denver, J.M. (+33/) : Combined use%NhOf 1* m n? H MNOf

of groundwater dating, chemical, and isotopic

o 0+ῌ %NhO0pqrsok

analyses to resolve the history and fate of nitrate ! 4t, NhO4 Imfu+

contamination in two agricultural watersheds,

RS%rsp $vwKxyo+,[ zAtlantic coastal plain, Maryland. Water Re-!.{| MNOx}~NyP

sources Research, -+ : ,-+3῎,--3.

Q r`IaNP4bc  f !

Cloke, H.L., Renaud, J.P., Claxton, A. J., McDonnell, J.

  rso% rsoN"J., Anderson, M.G., Blake, J.R. and Bates, P.D.

E#oN"4$[I5%(,**-) : The e#ect of model conﬁguration on mod-

 &+  f *IMNOP[,eled hillslope-riparian interactions. Journal of' !

Hydrology, ,13 : +01῎+2+.

f \]^[?0{+ 

Devito, K. J., Fitzgerald, D., Hill, A.R. and Aravena, R.

 -.O0 -Vyb , "(,***) : Nitrate dynamics in relation to lithology(+ MNOfRSo0) IaN 3/ῌ NhO0¡¢k£+,FG ! ¤¥¦  -.O

*M§¨ 33ῌ 0+©ko% ...2ῌ ª«k 

89$  !

and hydrologic ﬂow path in a river riparian zone.
Journal of Environmental Quality, ,3 (.) : +*1/῎+*2..
de Vos, J.A., Raats, P.A.C. and Feddes, R.A. (,**,) :Chloride transport in a recently reclaimed Dutch
polder. Journal of Hydrology, ,/1 : /3῎11.
Hedin, L. O., von Fischer, J.C., Ostrom, N.E., Kennedy,>?  +*1 ¼ ,**1

26

B.P., Brown, M.G. and Robertson, G.P. (+332) :0J >?@A KL23MKN40

,

Thermodynamic constraints on nitrogen trans-

OPQR! 02 0 : 0/1῍00,.

formations and other biogeochemical processes

STῌUV5ῌ66 W +322 :Hill, A.R. (+330) : Nitrate removal in stream riparian

URBAN KUBOTA, ,1 : /2῍0*.

;zones. Journal of Environmental Quality, ,/ : 1.-῍

" +332 :

1//.

_`B*<a'(bcde0

'( b[=>CDA + 0 

>?! 12 : ++῍+2.

Hill, A.R., Devito, K. J., Campagnolo, S. and Sanmugadas, K. (,***) : Subsurface denitriﬁcation in a

 X7Y8890X7BZ["9\]:<^>0

at soil-stream interfaces. Ecology, 13 (,) : 02.῍1*-.

;"ῌfW" +33+ :"@A

forest riparian zone : Interactions between hy-

'( bZB0CgD

drology and supplies of nitrate and organic car-bEh>CDA ῌ 0 F()GH !

bon. Biogeochemistry, /+ : +3-῍,,-.

 ῌ  ῌ  ῌ     +332 :+/. : 0/῍1,.
ῌ





;



 +331 :()F! 0. . : ,1῍-,.

; "   

"ῌQFRῌvIVS +32- : TULz@A>?@A#89$:<&='(0 >?@A'()B*>b

U NO--N _`>{|} F()GH ! +*. : 3῍+/.

%;~MVῌ6WXῌU

MῌY6Z[ +332 : \CDA῍+0 +,(EF! // 0 : /--῍

]

/-2.

!>?@Aa 0

-G. +33- : H >?@A+,/0"1I

῍
c#89d
A>!

:"e 3M

^_>?"  ` 0{
*b! .+3 : /*1῍/+0.

ῌ>?|}! N  :fD Hg?hAijA !  3M98>DA"2k>! >cde>y^_ 
pq!

P

2 : /-῍/2.

;10 p. /+!  2! !3
7 +32. : #"ῌLMNtuῌvO^wx +321 :>yA&='(_`no F()F! //ῌ ! +- : ,-῍-*.
#$%&'() +331 : *+,$-./0
4"ῌ56"ῌiIj"kῌ-Jl5 +330 : mH>?

@A'(_`nopq"r4?sK F 

ῌ ! +. : +-῍,*.
ῌῌ

89

89 

bg?

[=;<>lmDA no p89 1* m qrs>9!

89 b 0+῍ tuv b;}|A"f< y}! ^_  :wx;<yz 0  p > b;}|A¡*?¢£< ! tuv b{¤! tuv b| }C~ b| }Cyj8>a| Kkg> ;<"89! z¥ K>?|}j<9>! cde¦jv|§r¢;<¨©ª'«]r?p ¬r:¦[­ ,®'¯'°$± ";!

89yz b²³/ ¬y<   3/῍  p´µ¨³DA]± "V;}¶^< pq! ]r?p¨©ª'«  33῍ ·
DA8¸j!

b²³/ ...2῍ ¹DA! "f<º» : ,**1  -  + º : ,**1  1  3 J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
12)῏(
No. +*1, p. ,1 -0 ,**1 Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test
PITT
NAPL   ΐ*ῌῌ **ῌ **ῌ*E#ects of Tracer Flow Velocity on Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test (PITT)
for Estimating the Volume of Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids
Junko NISHIWAKI*, Tsuyoshi MIYAZAKI**, Masaru MIZOGUCHI** and Takeshi KOMAI** National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Institute for Geo-Resources
and Environment, Geo-analysis Research Group** Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo
Abstract
Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test (PITT), which is used for the chromatographic separation of
Break through curves (BTCs) of tracers, is useful to quantify the volume of Non-Aqueous Phase
Liquids (NAPL) in contaminated aquifer. Since this separation is based on the partition law, it ismost important to determine the partitioning coe$cients of the tracers.

However, the accuracyof the PITT would be inﬂuenced not only by the partitioning coe$cient, but also by the tracer
velocity. The e#ect of the latter factor on the accuracy has not been conﬁrmed su$ciently yet,due to the lack of the basic research compared with the practical requirement.

In this study, thee#ect of the tracer velocity on the accuracy of PITT was examined in laboratory column experiments.

As a result from the experiments where ﬁve tracer velocities were set up, the accuracy of

PITT was more improved as the velocity was lower.

It would be caused by non-equilibrium

partition of partitioning tracers into NAPL when the tracer velocity was higher, on the other
hand, the more su$cient partition was achieved when the velocity was lower.
Key words : Partitioning Interwell Traer Test (PITT), tracer velocity, trichloroethylene (TCE),
laboratory column experiment+DNAPL, efL.= gX NAPL U&'῍(>+    

DhijkXY lm/n0opq./0'rs῍t; uvwX./0'34x.=++     !"3412iyz{:q.XYU NAPL -.3

ῌ#῍$%&'῍()* +NAPL ; Non-Aqueous

49|!}~iq.\῎7].= /0

Phase Liquids, -./0'ῌ123456789:

}~q. NAPL i;<.= NAPL >? @ABCDE:F)*

!M567+1234GHI, JEKL<.MNOOPQR

NAPL 7UKL>567.= ;+TCE, !SMTNOOPQR+PCE, U 

cq.{:ῒgq.

X7< {:ῌGHiyz>XYU (7VWKL.XYZ[GH7\῎].= ^L_i NAPL -.349| ].U NAPL )*U'-`ab7cdXY Dense NAPL

9| - NAPL iq.^7* ῐ I¡¢£¤¥¦§¨ ©-*/ῌ2/03 k@fª«¬ +0ῌ+** ­®cFcF¯°F±²F¦§² ©++-ῌ20/1 ³®´µ +ῌ+ῌ+: Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test +PITT, MR¶·¶ῑ¸ MNOOPQR  ¹Tº»¼
IJ 56= u +*1 ¼ ,**1

28
+,PITT  

Test PITT  NAPL    PITT
% &

NAPL #+,-%4FbK Jinῐ῍ῒῌ ῍῎ῑ῏῎῏ῐ tin“
tix῎ ῐῑr῏ ῒῌ ῍῎῎῏ ῒ ,Jin et al., +31*  !  "#
$

}

et al., +33/ ; Young et al., +333 :  Partitioning Interwell Tracer+33/ 4K 0!

Q5N4

'(#)*

PITT-.+#/0

1

BB U~

+. ,

i  partitioning

% non-partitioningV" p )

V" n% Cd21 A*bK'( W@$X CrC*ῌ
% C* Cin mKK \T_Q

CinrC*13456787 9: !;l! K 56787 '( mg Lr+"" 56787 9: !; NAPL #<*z+&56787'( mg Lr+ ) C 21

21 $

# # = >$"56787 %56787

A*bK56787'( mg Lr+% b4#

 NAPL #$4>$"56787 5t DE min tin 56787 &DE min

6787 34 567879: !; &? Y B 

21 56787 '()@ A*" BB .* 0

56787 NAPL +C$DE "F

et al., +333

G NAPL

,H#-.$ %567873%

XZ4K +333 ) #`j7kl#@:bK Dwarakanath$3$ PITT  NAPL 



#Cq

%

4 /I 0J 21 14K56787 '(~ [bK\w3% ]# ῌ)@L2 "FG3ML2

PITT EK

 %56787#"56787 /I N4"B ῐ

21E#,H" NAPL 





" B

OPῌ8QRSQTU56V7-W$/(#XNAPL^ ῍ PITT EK87 ` Jin et al., +331 ῏ a@b56787"
cd

U NAPL e

#0J567- ,8Y B Mayer and Miller, +33,

87

Zῌ%3[ 8Y B )\]^5T_ PITT #+ NAPL   f(

` a9bK6 :B34c; # [ N¡"g%

 PITT )*d<e=f

NAPL

__ )@ ῎ IJKC5U5#+567

NAPL C%R4K $b<>@R]gh\5 U.S.

PITT #z  NAPL    +. + } :EPA, +331 #?=i)K`j7klC@:bK e.g.,

 NAPL C 56787 #w567

Nelson and Brusseau, +330 ; Annable et al., +332a m?n+op#+AB bK e.g., Jin et al., +33/ ;Wilson and Mackay, +33/ m Cq=VDbK


+-

87

%56787#"/I NAPL  D|P KN, w :4K o(

56787
PITT 

PITT

14KEF NAPL GH( SN r% BB

NAPL GH(IJK

LEs

NAPL Mt:ubK GHNOH

 NAPL

xNAPL



G

'FK

PITT



R#$Bw
NAPL C %R

 0Jb<¤ Nh"B ) m ¤v¥"B PITT #+ NAPL   f(

 NAPL b<# % $3$ NAPL C 567% SN

87 %R PITT CQ~¦§ )%R

v$w

xVN ῌ Vp ; 0Jb<¨©ª«#c"i¬­®

 cm- Vp Es cm- SN~ #56787"c PITT #+ NAPLῌ NAPL

VN  NAPL

NAPL C%1 $ 56787



N4

¢£p 4KR y PITT #z 56787 %56787#

  f( c|¯ op]°±²³

"/I34{2bK 56787

 56787"c ¦§ =# Willson et al.

SN/I|P R 

c|0! } Q~4K Jin et al., +33/ :Rx+y

KN, w SN “tpx
+rSN “tn

+. +

,*** ´ - µj"c:¨_«op' k4 "cl NAPL C 56787
#zm¶n·$`oc0J NAPL

tp 56787 RSTDE min “
tnBB  “  f(#²³¦§$F¸$ )

%56787 RSTDE min KN, w 5

pq4 ,**.  n+op ' 56787"c6787

rb"¹:#14K3ML2 ºs»43

NAPLῐ|P % 56787

RSTDE PITT

14K3ML2+ 7 PITT #+ NAPL   f(t3

?. : 97 Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test %PITT& $@* NAPL JK L$M*EF 

 ! "#$'()*+$

Willson et al. %,***&

 TCEῌ t@u#z{ῌ~mx   
u /M,H  TCEῌ~

IPA, .M,P, t@(( * 0./+ t@, PITT #(*-./0u ,1./+  ! 5

1230

 &*7'"(4! 5 6 # %,**.&

 -./7 8 
9, : ; ! 7!<=>4?(JK97 PITT $@* NAPL

L$M*EF#$** 1$,, 

+PITT #(*NOPQ0$< 9R$@STU NAPL D

 VTCE+ *.*,* cm min}+ Y

4!

4! - *+

 VTCE,VTCE. *.*0/ *.*22

t@u *.*3+ cm min}+ Y4!

< TCE bcY4!
 VTCE* * VTCE*

4!

)'_/ *.*+.

cm min}+ 4! %!ῌ,& 9$*, 
,+



1 TCE,-. Vbc!V*+$



,-Va DNAPL $@*bcd*+$ NAPL
< TCE  5

((VTCE/ VTCE0 t@u VTCE1 * 5VWRKX NAPL JK LY"Z*[\*+$ ]^_`)'_/<9/ : $  _/ *.*+, cm min}+ Y

C PITT DEF G"(<HI

#z{D^_`$@S9$* (, PITT $$@* A 9 B$

29</$/h

FID %01 GC-+1A&  _ GC-, 32¡¢gh_` 1*£  , ¤2¥¦$ +/£ min}+ efghi.j.k. %IPA& <.ῌlm.ῌ,ῌnopq. %.M,P&  /ῌlm.ῌ,ῌrs+1*£ 5¡¢"Z +1*£  - ¤2¥<4! q. %/M,H&  NAPL t@u

 t@u§¨¢v !ῌ+ $ wx"y #z{ %"y$|}-% ,.0. Mg m &  **./ mg Lῌ+Table +,**£  * og./+ mL  3© §¨ª«

NAPL 

}+

t@

 !

v

NAPL and alcohol tracers properties

,

B¬­

|/

45
6\

78
%£&

98
%£&

®pq.ῌ~ **
log Pow

:¯

¨;

°hh
±mo
%TCE&

ClCH²CCl,+-+4-3*4++ g/+** g%,/£&

bp10*²2043**}1-,4.,

d,*.²+4.0.,***
d,/.²+4.//3***+

efghi.
j.k.
%IPA&

CH-CHOHCH-

0*4*3

³5*

bp10*²
2,4/*

}224/

*4*/

d,*.²*412/*/***
d,/.²*412*2.***+.ῌlm.ῌ,ῌ
nopq.
%.M,P&%CH-&,CHCH,CH%OH&CH-+*,4+1

+-,

*42*,

,

+.2ῌ+/**42+*,/ῌlm.ῌ,ῌrsq. %CH-&,CHCH,CH,CH%OH&CH- ++04,%/M,H&* bp10* : 10* mmHg 78 %£&** ®pq.ῌ~ ´vῌµv<¶*+D=:· #?
*** d,*. : .£ ¸¹ ,*£ :¯+& Budavari, S., (Ed), The Merck Index +-th.
,& >º¬»¼^ph No. ,-, ,**.



S

A

/B¬ +- ®pq.

VWº

30ῌ,;<I¸¹

Table ,>+

¨T©9 mg L » +*1 ¼ ,**1

Experimental summary



IPA

.M,P

/M,H

¨TOKFF) m g

789
Mg m>-

VTCE*
VTCE+
VTCE,
VTCEVTCE.
VTCE/
VTCE0
VTCE1

+/-+
+/*.
+.3*
+.3.
+/**
+.-+/*/+.10+-*0+/*+/.+
+/.2
+.33
+.30
+.,.
+.,1

+//1
+/.2
+/20
+.21
+//.
+/,0
+/22
+/2.

1412
04++
/4*2
/420
04-1
04*.
14,+
142/

+40/
+40.
+40+411
+40.
+40.
+400
+40.

a

TCE 9SN-real >

®¯MPt"cm min>+

*4**
*4++
*4-+
*4+*
*4+*
*4*3
*4+,
*4+,

*4*+.
*4*+,
*4*,*
*4*,*
*4*,*
*4*0/
*4*22
*4*3+

,. 

ῌ+ 
 +- cm   , cm, 

!"#$%&'() *+,-./0 )123, 4 5,6 789:;<= +.0- Mg
m>- '?@ /0A B6C D"EFGHFG ;<I"J%K"LMNG#F"

OPQFR,ST,U ,6VW 23,6X VWYZ1[\]^_,-`a bc TCE <@debf gh,6 YZij;<= ,*῍ kR-@

TCE lmn"o!%p'qrsT,

6 =Xqr +)#%tuv,
$%&

!"#

`() w),6 w)xg': Xyz'{|,6}~q}' 
YZij, , ~qij) ,6 xg< )RR^_  TCE

A6

@ TCE :|< a'? Xyz1^_ @:)R]@ ,6. X@$ῌ!Fpv R`z: YZza

TCE
ῌ+

 -`YZ, `@deghX  Mto%Kt#uv,
Pt

Fig. +



Schematic diagram of experimental setup

,6 qD - ,OKFF)m;<= *.," cm min>+ «'YZij cm-

pv ,6 =X Pt ¡¢() v*+;<I=]±]

,6 ()£ TCE 

TCE 9: degh²sT,6YZi¨TOKFF)¤:¥'¦@R§|,6m©9;<= +,/** mg L>+ {|,gh,6. ©9:ª-6 «ῌ, ' aj;<= ,*῍ kR-@ TCE ijR TCE sTX$%&`A6 TCE ijR³'?@;¬@¨TOKFF©9 mg L>+ ¨TOKFF

6 ¨TOKFF©9: +. - '´µ,6 Cin '?@) m g VW789 Mg m>- a,/  TCE 

9 SN-real > ­Y w,®¯°-MPt



OKFF¶·: OKFF¶·ij ¨Ti#, : -¼6 Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test PITT +f NAPL

 ῌ      

   !"#  

 d +.z­®

31a c+./0R 1+2
yz" .M,P  /M,H (=
/M,H 

6+i!j6 IPR?

$  !"# %& ")' !

"'()* +,#x8%)6"*)



-  ./0!"1# ./0

-,

2

 PITT +f TCE

 +3) 4567)8%

9:; 

PITT



d

(

#=+ PITT d ( =  PITT d( ῌ- +<=

 PITT op!"

>?1 ./0@A!"(B/CDEFG

TCE $SN-estCHIJKL+M 45N+O B/PC

( ./042

QOR ( *# M>?( SN-estῌSN-real = 2

OR 1 6STUVWXY

4+e  TCE    ¡ @+;Z[\ OR (]^*_` GC-FID  (S- 

SN-real TCE $ ./0 PITT %"rst!" +. +¢()*#a  £& TCE
 ,. . ¤fh+ ¥¦./04+§ Z >?1+k1 TCE  ¨ mg L©+ 2 +ª*«;!j fj*-+ 

a IPA 6c: >?d

TCE $

TCE $

 + +b)'69)6<6 VTCE,>?1 TCE 8¬%­®;)yz*! ¯>?+e 2

 VTCE0  *.-- efg *./0 )hi);j"  6k*)l51

ῌ, + 

TCE $

TCE $

(

 efg PITT d ( ῌ- +<=°ῌ, +'±B/PCQ cm min©+ M6mn>?opa6 -. - Yqrstuvw+xyz*O

.M,P efg /M,H (²³* Mmn >?{|}~)´µ PITT d ¶·(<= B/PCQ(+h'a *.*,* cm min©+ *|j - ()>? PITT d;%+=';) >?~}+fM¸;!j ! B/PCQ( *.*,* cm(9) M  9min©+ Y@>?6 *.*0/ cm min©+ Y}>' *.0+ i *.+,  :i);j?f'*: '±;B/PCQ¹«+f PITT

" =*(O>?opd 6}=º6"  PITT da .M,P  /M,H ῌTable -PITT op

Summary of the results from the experiments for studying the e#ectsof tracer velocities on PITT$SN-est

PITT d

>?+

.M,P

/M,H

.M,P

/M,H

IPA

.M,P

/M,H

VTCE*
VTCE+
VTCE,
VTCEVTCE.
VTCE/
VTCE0
VTCE1

*4**
*4*/
*4+/
*4*/
*4**4*,
*4*.
*4*-

*4**
*4*/
*4+*4*/
*4*,
*4*+
*4*,
*4*-

»
*4.1
*4.3
*4.1
*4-*4+*
*4-*
*4+*

»
*4.1
*4.,
*4.1
*4,*4*2
*4+2
*4+*

*43,
*43*4-*42*+4*,*42*4/0
*422

*40+
*4.2
*4+2
*4,0
*4/3
*4/0
*4.0
*4.2

*4-1
*4,+
*4+/
*4+,
*4-*
*4-2
*4-,
*4,3

*



*  PITT d  PITT op!" $SN-est ( ./042
TCE $SN-real  SN-estῌSN-real =J§M6? V +*1 ¼ !,**1"

32

 g'BC& VTCE+

VTCE1   pbcum3v- 7J g'BCrs





.



W6= 

PH , /w1230x= pv 1y77  P 232JH῍"

iYjk6

F&bcum<6= g'BC& VTCE+ VTCE1 3z&VTCE. 4{&3 iYj *.*,* cm min/+ |}BC 5~Z"P 123 12 3=TP  pXYZpu30x '  
iYj3 *.*0/ cm min/+ |0BC 0q p2 WFhXYZpuv-HP $P$ XY|rs 

ῌ,



Fig. ,

iYj7 PITT U7d»

The relation between the accuracy of
PITT and tracer velocity

3 , /w12$ AA VTCE.

+,iYj *.*,* cm min/+ }a VTCE, VTCE- 7mH&bc$677$=
 8BCP  P=9H:a]  ; F&<=-
3AA7 Q  *..3 0&]  7@f&HBC-- 



A&BC3&    !C" 

.

῏-

VTCE*

5>3mHG

NAPL $A7389 & BC?e

VTCE1   !Cin" #$ 

 !CῌCin"  %& '  ()*ῌ+,-.+. !/" & 0  12345 $6

VTCE, 7 VTCE0 |{=@~LL$

789 &':; <6=>%?@$ BC IPA D3 +& IPA 45=3 F= 8BCE

AA VTCE, (3BCD

EFG2H& VTCE, I TCE 
3 *.-+ !῏," 72J K &L MN
3OPA7?6 H$6 . WFh¡¢FG789 &$P$ g' VTCE* £]==BCF&& Q R&

.M,P 7 /M,H D3¤¥ *.0+ |} *.-2 |TCE 32J 3 TCE S}  DH}&CV7$

TPA7UV789=  ῌ" ¦I ῍" J§¨K WFh῎"

W6=& 

 VTCE,& IPA XY3 + F

L0M

F&©Ht389

& AA G= XYZ?[N"Tª«,#%8O$=¦I¬­H6' 3\!$]  0B^XY"

789 & Q PQa®i[C

FG_37$==6&]
& F= VTCE, #$%`a9H63 bc d$=1e7 9&A7f&&R¯°S¨K347±tH6A73v- ῎"d$= Divine et al. !,**." 3²$F³ L0M©30xA76J<P´µ

F&g'() W:;3R&A7P  8BCL0M F&

Fh῍" iYjk6l 

©H67¶9H6 $P$ Annable et al. !+332b"A P  ῌ" TCE

bc3mH&A73*no& 7J  XYZpT Brooks et al. !,**," WFh0q 7rs 123mH=6&3HPUV7$=©89=6&3 ¹P

ῌ"

TCE

d $ =  g ' 

&*µ¸µDSP7Tº$=6& 8

+,K$ 'BC ·*µ¸µ& IPA D3SJ

F&g'()

VTCE* t·*µ¸µD

: 

 Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test PITT  NAPL 

ῌῌFig. -

Breakthrough curves of IPA, .M,P and /M,H33

»XN 1 +*1 ¼ e,**1f34 .M,P /M,H      


!

"#$

$  1 =WI1AR
789:9  ]>0"#$*.*,* cm min+ , , X4YZ[

 %&'() PITT   .M,P  /M,H#`$(789:9789:9%

cd& ? I+ *.*0/ cm min+ ,` *+ *.0+ , *.-2 ,-.-/0-1-  2345

 6789:9;<1.1=> 9Z6789:9 J`?1 |}  X4YZ[ 0- 789:9

 "#$ %&'  , ?@ - ?@A TCE  

BC789:9 -0789:95ῌTCE 5k¡¢1"DE345  FG-EH-

£ T@-U! 0  X4YZ[

IAJ$.A I K

j>'Qm

At-'¤A  789:9 TCE  ("L MN   

£1R AO$1-789:9 345 <1;:9  Pm0


:9

P

0 Q

0789  6789:9 <1R 7

89:9A  345 AST U
A! 0.,j

TCE A1-789,` %cd&RP0 PITT '789:9&lA PITT ^#0{0},.A"m0 Vῌ, p PITT ^#|} X4YZ[B¥A 789
:9345

PITT 

kC1R TCE Vῌ, R "W1X4YZ[\]AR PITT ^ "£AD1-.vA789:9 # _`a_ b$0 * %cd& eVῌ "#$  789:97B¥AR

-f g=hi PITT jk'A#5R¦dAt1 NAPL



789:9&lPm X4YZ[ PITT ^ eWillson et al., ,***f"#$  #no,.A"m

PITT (.%AE§0FG17HI J0

¨K

.- 

Vῌ- ApX4YZ[%cd&g=hAn

V ῌ, p X4YZ[ *.*,* cm min+"m (q) VTCE*  r789:9 - LM PITT ^#=INAn*; pI+ q) 789:9

 ,.APm0 VTCE.

X4YZ[

 (789*.*,* cm min+   PITT ^# eVῌ,f:9 $A<1g=p $

X4YZ[ *.*,* cm min+ ,( OR,#\]A , -satq)Qm0789:9 , -sat Vῌ- %cd&AJ$.A VTCE.

TCE .uAR ) , -sat,#\]6789:9 ?© 91)vw9xyz0{|} IA ,Zkh 1    X4YZ[ª~/0} "#$ 1 + Aῌ23ST t1- PITT ^#0} !

4 1 , A<1 , 5kAHA 

0 

67 789:9/DE3  89

d&g=A3Qt"#$( YLr1- b$0- q)Qm0 , -satAn

 PITT (.%A  P$%c

0$A PITT ^# «¬ *./ R# $ 789:97,­A PITT A NAPL ST

 ,#\]at :;  5'PI^#AU#0} .u P 0

;ῌ&l 670} at:  TCE  0} 789:9 NAPL ®  NAPL

789:9 5A%7#g=.u¯=WINA1.789:9(670} P 0"£1r "#$  °±A- 0$1

I+ (q) r789:9A , -s
at

Qm0

²V J0 (789:9789/:9kh< 1   -q)
(789:9A , -sat J$  *at: < 1 $ ³´  PITT µ¶·(- 789:9
7¸-

PITT AU#W *¹º¼ :  Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test %PITT+ 

 PITTNAPL 

   ,  !!
"#$ %TCE &'( )*(+ /M,H ,-./0123456)

NAPL  q vw

35tion Journal, +. (,) : 1ῌ-+.
Dwarakanath, V., Deeds, N. and Pope, G.A. (+333) :.M,P

Analysis of Partitioning Tracer Tests, ENVIRON-, 78

MENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, -- (,+) :9:;< - = >?@A-2,3ῌ-2-0.

232B6CDE()FG 

Jin, M., Butler, G.W., Jackson, R.E., Mariner, P.E.,

HCI  J(K LJM;<

Pickens, J.F., Pope, G.A., Brown, C.L. and Mc- . N:  E(>?

Kinney, D.C. (+331) : Sensitivity Models and De-@A32B6()K LJMO;<Psign Protocol for Partitioning Tracer Test in Al- 3456(Q)*)*

luvial Aquifers, GROUND WATER, -/ (0) : 30.ῌ);< RIS TU( PITT VWX

31,.

YO Z[\]^(+_ `abRcJin, M., Delshad, M., Dwarakanath, V., McKinney, D.

de(O *.*,* cm minf+ gh10i jV]k l

C., Pope, G.A., Sepehrnoori, K. and Tilburg, C.E.

+ HCI `mO gn(+33/) : Partitioning Tracer Test for Detection, Es-

o&'k pqD Ers k\Ht PITT

timation and Remediation Performance Assess-

NAPL uvwVqsVx

ment of Subsurface Nonaqueous Phase Liquids,yk z{(+ ῏WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, -+ (/) : +,*+ῌ

῎

+,++.
Mayer, A.S. and Miller, C.T. (+33,) : The inﬂuence of|}~VWX +_ N  

porous medium characteristics and measurement (+ | N

scale on pore-scale distributions of residual non-  O}~  S \Daqueous-phase liquids, Journal of ContaminantV ¡:R ¢£¤¥¦Rkῌ ῑ ῐ ῍Hydrology, ++ : +23ῌ,+-.
Nelson, N.T. and Brusseau, M.L. (+330) : Field Studyof the Partitioning Tracer Method for Detection

Annable, M.D., Jawitz, J.W., Rao, P.S. C., Dai, D.P.,

of Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid in a Trichlo-

Kim, H. and Wood, A.L. (+332a) : Field Evaluationroethene-Contaminated Aquifer, ENVIRONMEN-

of Interfacial and Partitioning Tracers for Char-TAL SCIENCE & TECNOLOGY, -* (3) : ,2/3ῌ

acterization of E#ective NAPL-Water Contact,20-.

Areas, GROUND WATER, -0 (-) : .3/ῌ/*,.
Annable, Michael D., Rao, P.S.C., Hatﬁeld, K., Graham,§¨ ῌ ©

ª« ῌ ¬­®¯ῌ °±%,**. : ´NAPL ῌ ²ῌ

³µ)*

W., Wood, A.L. and Enﬁeld, C.G. (+332b) : PARTI-¶d %PITT Z·TIONING TRACERS FOR MEASURING RESID-· 31 : +-ῌ,..

¸S ¹º»UAL NAPL : FIELD-SCALE TEST RESULTS,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (+331) : Tech-

Journal of Environmental Engineering, +,. : .32ῌnology Practices Manual for Surfactants and/*-.

Cosolvents.

Brooks, M.C., Annable, M.D., Rao, P.S.C., Hatﬁeld, K.,

Willson, C.S., Pau, O., Pedit, J.A. and Miller, C.T. (,***) :Jawitz, J.W., Wise, W.R., Wood, A.L. and Enﬁeld,

Mass transfer rate limitation e#ects on partition-

C.G. (,**,) : Controlled release, blind tests ofing tracer tests, Journal of Contaminant Hydrol-

DNAPL characterization using partitioning tracers, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, /3 : +21ῌ,+*.

ogy, ./ : 13ῌ31.
Wilson, R.D. and Mackay, D.M. (+33/) : Direct Detection of Residual Nonaqueous Phase Liquid in the

Divine, C.E., McCray, J.E., Wolf, L.M., Blanford, W. J.,

Saturated Zone Using SF0 as a Partitioning

Blitzer, D. J. and Boving, T.B. (,**.) : Partitioning

Tracer, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECH-

tracer test, DNAPL characterization, remediation

NOLOGY, ,3 (/) : +,//ῌ+,/2.

assessment, sourcezone investigation, Remedia-

Young, C.M., Jackson, R.E., Jin, M., Londergan, J.T.,K%  +*1  ,**1

36Mariner, P.E., Pope, G.A., Anderson, F. J. and Houk,

Water Monitoring and Remediation, +3 (+) : 2.ῌ

T. (+333) : Characterization of a TCE DNAPL Zone

3..

in Alluvium by Partitioning Tracers, Ground῍ 

ῌ Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids NAPL ῌ

 Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test PITT!"#$% NAPL &'()*+,-.

/0123 PITT 45 NAPL &'()6 NAPL 7892:;<=<>?@A !"BC
D:EFGHI./2JKLM!04N :;<=< NAPL 7896OPQRST U).
/3 VWX689OPYIZ[ NAPL &'()\]^!_`T3 abcS6 :;<=<def! PITT  NAPL &'()\]7ghijLkl2mnopFqW
rLst23 uvw :;<=<dexyz NAPL &'()\]{|}~{H.

/23 2 QV de.! 89:;<=< TCE 789}! de1! 89OPVt22m()\]^2 h/23 : ,**1  -  ,, K : ,**1  1  ,* 
J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
#C%
No. +*1, p. -1 .- ,**1   *ῌ**E#ects of Imogolite Addition on Colloidal Stability ofMontmorillonite and Kaolinite
Yu Lu MA* and Jutaro KARUBE*** United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture andTechnology, -ῌ,+ῌ+ Chuo, Ami-machi, Ibaraki-ken, -**ῌ*-3-, Japan** Faculty of Agriculture, Ibaraki University, -ῌ,+ῌ+ Chuo, Ami-machi,
Ibaraki-ken, -**ῌ*-3-, Japan
Abstract
E#ects of imogolite addition on colloidal stability of montmorillonite and kaolinite were examined to clarify the colloidal properties of imogolite which coagulates in alkaline condition.
One to one mixture of montmorillonite and imogolite coagulated at any pH. Observation throughtransmission electron microscope revealed that montmorillonite and imogolite, including the
mixture with lower imogolite concentration, mutually ﬂocculated (formed a domain) at any pH.
Non-deferrated kaolinite coagulated below pH /.3 and dispersed above pH 0.*, whereas /῍ imogolite added sample showed the opposite stability. Deferrated kaolinite dispersed above pH ..,,
whereas +*῍ imogolite added sample coagulated at any pH.

All the imogolite added samples

microscopically ﬂocculated both under acidic and alkaline conditions. In acidic conditions, it
was attributed to the electrostatic attraction between permanent negative charge of crystalline
clay minerals and variable positive charge of imogolite. In alkaline conditions, it was considered
to be resulted by the neutralized surface charge of imogolite.
Key words : imogolite, montmorillonite, kaolinite, colloidal stability, charge characteristics

Harsh et al. ',**,( b7c Tsuchida et al. ',**/( d+    

ef/JKLM2ghI:*+Vijkl

 !"#$%& 'Horikawa, +31/ ; Harsh etal., +33, ; Karube, +332()

*+,-.

/&_mnI9)@ '+332( -opf2

V +*῍ qr_C-opfC/st'PZNC( / pH 0.* 012&34 567389 pH 

B_VuvX) 564:*+/;< 'Clark and McBride, +32. ; 4

wC"#$%VxyzlV{HB_V|}),**-() 562=>>?@A) BCDE!C

5B4 BB f -S

FG2H9I4 Horikawa '+31/( /
_eS

2

V~I4 5C2Z[VnC:*+/JKLCMNO2PQ4 RSTOUVWIB_273

XYNO5CZ[/\]X^_`aX) ]X4

X)* r -**ῌ*-3- i -ῌ,+ῌ+**  -**ῌ*-3- i -ῌ,+ῌ+
4 f -S
4 eS
4 D4 +*D :CV@>27 _»  d +*1 ¼ ,**138
0./ 
Karube, +332   pH Ahmad and ($ G(7 w7f, E"H9 ," 4/

!" pH #$ %&'   

892($

,,, ()*+,-." /0 12 

7- +332 *+ bc"%&

3 45 6 ,**- (7 89%Clk  :*;< #$ =( pHsUtu5 A + g f, x?

 >*  )?@A2B<)$ C*.*, M;D  *%&)

NaOH  pH

E**4  89% #*D

I I.
);D

Na\ *

KNO- J2($ /* cm-*.. M  NaCl

M2( KL" ,. {|*D f,w7

KL

, cm- p, HCl *.* cm-

2($ I2xl" pH

892

FG*H E$ IC C.-E($ H2 8l"OL f,  2"J FG K 2(*L #@ANO" TPjM- FGH !($

x2( $%j$ f,KLH2 NO &l(=, 

=892( + M KNO-Pj/* cm- sUtu5p," Q2 IT+** cm- sUtu5 *C*

- ?>,+ 

2( Jj$ C$%j*Jj Na\ FG*2"N O;P ,ῌ !QR

+ Clk 

6&8QR + ῌ 9#

22($ 922( Na\ * Clk S2M-{¡Ry($ *2"UVW8 F UVXYZ[&2 ¢2£" &02 CEC * AECSN

2("TFG Karube, +332

Na\ $%2( Ahmad#($ %&*2"&and Karube, +332

'%& ] J^ (_`+., mm a>
Na\ $%2(4 #($ )O %& E¤7($,,- !"#$%&#@A 892(f,*3c4
kg mk-

2"T

A *.*.

¥U2 <VW2(%u¦X" %) ,**+ *+ bc"N O;Pd§¨&YZ©t A + mm ª I

e /ῌ !QRSN «[-¬­\®¯°2($

2(f,4#($ g + mS mk+ a>.f,4-.2"hij- '()*&)l(4 #($,, 

-+ ++,)+-./0,,+ 
k-*., kg m/j-++ 12 *FGm#n2 01o+ : * + : *.+ + : *./ + : +* : +K 2($ K o H2o *3c5$pH %&12FG@A2(%&dk-

2* g m FG K 2(f,#@A ±῍+*2 %&²$ !"

#2($  FG + : *.+ K f, pH ,.1 a>@A2 pH -.* aT #2($ (q2#]³K^/ *FGH2o + : * + : *.*/ + : *.+ * : +;? <)? 0´_7 µgM NO*);D FG 4p2($ FGq¶-.($ + : *./ K f, pH -.- a>@A2 pH

r 
K

f,

 2 g mk- *2($/* cm sUtu5-./ aT]³K-*? 12 HCl=( NaOH  pH

,($ I.aivHw6p,)Ml($ f,w7 xl" pH
f, z +~P +{;<|l"M- +/892 y{:}; Mr

{;<|l" ,. {<=C*- ?

>2($ pH 92"M- ,. {<=2(f,j?
@7WA +* cm- x?

#BT/  CD MODEL TY-.D EM-#F

892($ / 89 f, pH

892#2($ C  + : *.+ K f,*^!*^/  < `<NO¶-.($+ : + K f,!" pH @A2($ Q

FG


:(7  *a·£b ;?@A2(*+,-.

$ 89%@A2( c ¸2" -. ,. , =*7"+°$-+, !"#$%&'(



FG + : *./ K

f,­\®¹º ¹º῍+

²$ Q pH ...

 : DA #$%&N0h$&,-1"_`ῌ+

#$%&DATU,-1 "N c*., kg m-M : #$%& I : 
~B TU  + " ,-* "uv

Fig. +

Colloidal stability of montmorillonite, imogolite, and their mixtures. (measured using
scattered light, c*., kg m-)M : montmorillonite, I : imogolite
Relative turbidity approaches + when dispersed and * when coagulated.
ῌ+

   Karube, +332  

M : I+ : *./pH ...

M : I+ : *./pH 3..

39

#$%&DATUH IJK

Photo +

Transmission electron micrographs ofmontmorillonite-imogolite mixtures.

!"  #$%&'(")*+,- ./0$1 pH 3.. 
23 4#$%&'(")*+-, 





-,+ 

  5,- #$

0h$&ijkTUB pH /.3 lm,-8%&,-"6789:;<= >pH 0.* ln83 Sῌ, pH 0.* ln

8 #$%&'"67?")*

B pH+3@A B2;<=

"uv3aC Sῌ- pH /.3 lm,-CopHq r]8 sHq t%

B 0h$&pHq wx?"yz8 sHqDAEAFG<3H IJKLM"N{|3aC 3}8 sHqBpHq~==O #$%&B DAEA"

Oz 0h$&ijkTU"F

PQR1>./0$1>,-83 Sῌ+ /ῌ DA R18./0$1B,-83+ : *./ + : *.+ DATU VWX"83B YZ%

Sῌ, R183B sHq

"B,-8>,-[ \]^@A #

3a;<= " + : *.+ DATUB R1

$%&_` ]^3a bc!de"fg8

 ./0$10h$& =N*>o"N;<=3 @A <3B
8^ rBµ¶ ·eJ ¸ +*1 ¹ 9,**1:

40

ῌῌ,

 9RNO:
FG`a.
/ bc¬J 9+, :K :  I : FG+,-  ./M ®¯ FGIJM `a°
±*+,- ²³_#80¯

Fig. ,

Colloidal stability of kaolinite (non-deferrated) and kaolinite-imogolite mixtures(measured using scattered light).
K : kaolinite, I : imogolite
Scattered light intensity increases whendispersed. Although imogolite disperses inacidic conditions, scattered light was imperceptible due to low concentration.

 9RNO
9*.*, M NaCl ´:

Fig. -

%

NO:

WV¬J

Charge characteristics of kaolinite (nondeferrated and deferrated) (measured with*.*, M NaCl).

E FG ZVW

h ijklmn 0 !"#$ KLJbcM
op

C*'PqVrstuvw<=!wM$-,, 

RNO./ xMFG + : *./`a./ Vrstuyzyzῌ,{M$ pH ... 9|}:  pH +*.. 9bc|}: FG
     !"#$% %&' (ῌ, )*+,- ./0'

12&3 "*% 4" 

~E*'*$ %%8  FG

bcM !"#$ pH ...   ~ *UVWM !"#x FGZ VWC8"4$ 56,- )*'% &378 9(ῌ.:$ ;pH +*.. bcMe ' FG ~<= 56,- >?@ AB<= % V@ J E rh ῌLῌL

CDE 

FGH +*῍  IJKLJ EM

% 78"#$klmn  !"#$ FGZVWCJM

9Gustafsson,,**+: 4 KLJFGA¡bcNO./ pH .., PQ 9(ῌM% !¢M#] V@ J  !

pH UV£¤ ¥¦#$ KLJFG WXY4 9(ῌ-:$ IJZVW[~ ZVW §¨4 M#] FG©/:$ NO./RNO./ ST'MT'\M UVW

ST#]^_*$ %# FGH +*῍ `aM MT'

pH bc 9(ῌ/:$IJbc  NOdefg UVW ª « ¬ UVWCFF
 ~ E !"#$­

pH ... $ %# (ῌ0tu : BC<=+>vwZ[=>@Ac8xy z{ῒῌ.

Z[=> \]^_` #BCab@Ac8 \def`K : Z[=> I : 
fdeg0 ab@A #EFhi j῍,#kl :mno iFig. .

Colloidal stability of kaolinite (non-deferrated) and kaolinite-imogolite mixtures(measured using transmitted light).
K : kaolinite, I : imogolite
Transmitted light intensity decreases whendispersed. Ordinate was inverted for comparison with Fig. ,.

K : Iq+ : *.+pH ... (dispersed)

K : Iq+ : *.*/

pH +*.. (coagulated)

41

ῐῑῌ,

Z[=>#BCab KLMrs

Photo ,

Transmission electron micrographs ofkaolinite-imogolite mixtures.

   



!"#$%"&

' pH +*.. ()*+,- ./0 
 12 

345

678(9 :  ;##$%"&'.ῌ ῎ ῍ ῏ῌ <=+>0 ? pH (@A ῒῌ/Fig. /

Z[=> \^_` #BCab@Ac8 \Apf` + : + (BC

<=+>0

Colloidal stability of kaolinite (deferrated)and kaolinite-imogolite mixtures (measured
using scattered light).

FGHI@A JC-  KLMNO&P? pH ( ' BCDCE
<=+>#0 ? pH (Q ' R8( 0 <=+>
STU#VWXY :#$%"& '

_«'aS ¬ +*1 ­ y,**1z42

::Z[   '()*+,%\]^_`a'bcJ+,'WX'2dD   'eB-+fgh0$2%3#45

ῌ ῐ ῏ ῍
Ahmad, M.M. and Karube, J. (+332) : E#ects of salts
and pH on the critical coagulation concentrationof montmorillonite. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Irrig. Drain.
Reclam. Eng., +3/ : 3-῏33.
Clark, C. J. and McBride, M.B. (+32.) : Cation and anion retention by natural and synthetic allophane
and imogolite. Clays and Clay Minerals, -, : ,3+῏
,33.
Gustafsson, J.P. (,**+) : The surface chemistry of imogolite. Clays and Clay Minerals, .3 : 1-῏2*.
Harsh, J.B., Chorover, J. and Nizeyimana, E. (,**,) :Allophane and imogolite. pp. ,3+῏-,,. ln J.B. Dixon
and D.G. Schulze (ed.) Soil mineralogy with environmental applications. SSSA Book Series No. 1.
῎ῌ0% Y9'+ ¡¢£¤¥'¦§¨
yO :  ; ;<=  ©<= P$z
yª :  ; ;<=:©<=:P$z

Fig. 0Illustrations explaining the transmission
electron micrographs of kaolinite-imogolite
mixtures.
(upper : acidic ; ﬂocculated in microscopic
and dispersed in macroscopic observation)(lower : alkaline ; ﬂocculated both in microscopic and macroscopic observation)

SSSA, Madison, WI.
Harsh, J.B., Traina, S. J., Boyle, J. and Yang, Y. (+33,) :Adsorption of cations on imogolite and their effect on surface charge characteristics. Clays andClay Minerals, .* : 1**῏1*0.
Horikawa, Y. (+31/) : Electrokinetic phenomena of
aqueous suspensions of allophane and imogolite.
Clay Science, . : ,//῏,0-.
Karube, J. (+332) : Hysteresis of the colloidal stabilityof imogolite. Clays and clay minerals, .0 : /2-῏/2/.

ijklm ῌ nopq ῌ rstu ῌ hvwx y+332z :ῌ 

pH /.3 

 !

/῍ "#$% &

' '()*+,-./

012%3#45 6 7'89:;<=
>$% pH ??@4A

'BCDEF῍ 

={|}% '%,+~_  +30 : +*-῏++*.
ijklm y,**-z : ',+~%

 _ ,20῏,21.
h y,**-z : _'= } p -..
Tsuchida, H., Ooi, S., Nakaishi, K. and Adachi, Y.

GDHIJ(,**/) : E#ects of pH and ionic strength on elec-+,-KLM0D pH .., NO 75

trokinetic properties of imogolite. Colloids andSurfaces A : Physicochemical and Eng. Aspects,

! +*῍ "#$%PQ' pH 

' RSG1'J+,-TTU"7%GD  '()*+,%'V'WX-./012%3#45
῎ ;<=>$% PQ' Y9

,0/ : +-+῏+-..

m y,**+z : v?4'={|}' ^_ . : ,.,῏,.2.

pq : *+:   r6s  !tu %&῍ !"43ῌ 

 #$%&'()     + : + *+,   - (. pH ,) /012345678    -

 *+9+:;<=+>. (. pH ?@,) ABC - pH/.3 DE, pH 0.* DF ,: G /ῌ 

KL -(.

 #$ !:HI,) J *+MN-OPP,) QRS- O TUV/WXYZ[\]^_`/Wab -cd:/efgh ij7)klmno : ,**1 m . n ,* okRmno : ,**1 m 3 n 1 o῔
J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
]^_+`O
No. +*1, p. ./῍// ῎,**1῏

 *ῌ**ῌ

***Test of a Groundwater Level Control Scheme for Higher Soybean Yield
in Multi-purpose Paddy Fields
Shou MURAKAMI*, Choichi SASAKI** and Takeyuki ANNAKA**** Akita Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Center, Agricultural Experiment Station,-.ῌ+ Genpachizawa, Aikawa, Yuwa, Akita, Akita, *+*ῌ+,-+, Japan** Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science, Hirosaki University,- Bunkyo-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, *-0ῌ2/0+, Japan*** Faculty of Agriculture, Yamagata University,+ῌ,- Wakaba-machi, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, 331ῌ2///, Japan
Abstract
In this study, we examined a groundwater control scheme to increase soybean yield in multipurpose paddy ﬁelds.

In a multi-purpose paddy ﬁeld with a box connecting the irrigation canalto underdrain system and a ﬂexible overﬂow relief well (denoted “the experimental plot”), thegroundwater level was aimed to keep at +* cm below the soil surface of the ﬁeld during the blossom and maximum luxuriance stages, i.e. in August when much water is required for soybean
growth.

On the other hand, in another multi-purpose paddy ﬁeld with a horizontal relief well(denoted “the conventional plot”), the outlet of the relief well was kept at 2* cm below the soil
surface and was always opened.

The study was conducted for two years on these plots. The

actual groundwater level in the ﬁeld, soil water content in the topsoil and the soybean yield were
measured.

In the ﬁrst year, the actual groundwater level in the experimental plot in August was

kept higher (+-..

/.* cm below the soil surface) as compared to that in the conventional plot (,,.3

1./ cm). Soybean yield in the former was ,/῍ higher than that in the latter, indicating thee#ect of the groundwater level control scheme.

In the second year, the actual groundwater levelin the experimental plot in September was kept higher (from -* to .* cm below the soil surface) as
compared to that in the conventional plot (from 0* to 1* cm), and soybean yield in the former was+0῍ higher than that in the latter. Hydraulic conductivity in the plow layer and subsoil was
found to become higher through the soybean cultivation. These results showed the possibility ofhigher yield in the soybean cultivation in multi-purpose paddy ﬁelds by adapting the groundwater level control scheme.

It was also suggested that the groundwater level should be managed

properly throughout the year to maintain low permeability of the subsoil.
Key words : Soybean, ﬂexible overﬂow relief well, multi-purpose paddy ﬁeld, blossom stages,
groundwater level control*   !"#"#$%&#'()*+,-)#./0
56789 -.ῌ+** :;"##*<)#= 1*-0ῌ2/0+ >?:;@AB *** CD"##= 1331ῌ2/// CDEFGHB +ῌ,ῐῌῒῌῑ : IJKL MNOPQRL STL UVWL XYZ[\

1*+*ῌ+,-+ 234ΐ 2 +*1 ¹ ,**1

46

ME y ῑ^*+    ha ` oiME y :1) +1   +- ++   ,**0



.

ha  2,῍   ῎

%*.
l O ,**-

4-ME yqr FOE-

AS fq ^_70. )0H 9:#  

8F.H# qME y ywx/.| 2 c. H  A56!!"#$%"#& ' ( $) # *+%&,H -0H ῑ y  

'()*+ -.ῌ/0$,1 %- ῑ ,+ ,**+ ^_/. V= ). ῑ 

 2+34/%01%+%)# 35 2- 3678 456# 9:7

!

 7870.HH

8;970 7+ 2 , 34 ῐ῏8

H ῑ ῑ:/ =>8

(,1<%=>&-?) 2 | &-)]ME ywx. q=> 9:@ ;A 2. B<=><C<  ^_`VWalmn` M  Z# ?D 4-$%%@02 EA

y:1/=>z C` uv.

H IH/ME y g¡¢s£¤  X| .CDῐ J KEῌL +322 569:IH/.

 Xwx hYN n¡% g¡¢s£ 4&,***

$FBG. MEῐ J ῍F1 NG +32, ; HOῌP +322 ; Q-¤T4UME y¢8oi!+ +33, %&ῐ῏82 '¥£¤.

MEῐ J

8R :8S%&T IUIV2- WX Y

,   

J70%KZ 2
EA ,*** => XL-'[,+\ - T]^/ 2 +,¦+¦+ §i_MCN` XZaO  ) 2

0PQ

=> ,**- T4U ,**.  . 9

Za 4RS%bcdeE 4_M$% T4 ¥¦§¨©¨ª ©¥§«:

U 0VWfX.*+ 2 2 ,/. )M ,**+  7870 g hYi .Z





¬ ­z/ªg«70. ,**,   [j\]k +31, ' ^_`almn` *¬70 ®¯ 569­70. ,**- &. Xoi) 2 )`D

=> 56 H 9:H ῑ# "pq 1*῍ VRrcb-RS%C`2 ῑ H  :/. V= z.. 2 c. ^_s`c rcb-tb

   *.2 ha   ῑH56# ®arc&b-70

`D}/^Za /. V= ¯

0VWtbPQdceRu eE b-vw70 fghifar  +.* hacb-&% 2 -%.

jxkey;z{c)l*+RS eE/)e. => z #°°±²569­ M

cma./ cm ±7 -/ cm, ³ +* cm

E +*

°°W´

!5

m|. X}n8oi%6µ²7³ / m D´ ;9 /. ?ῌ+ )0+) 2 % &-=>;K¶x"# 2 }µ ¶µ.  jop Xqrst uvw

= ·  ῌ+

~ wxoi2·¸X¹J ·¸X¹Jk \k +331qrstuvMEy:1/.ῐ῏z {+ +321  Shimada et al. +33/ +331 2¸/.T- 2 %TX¹

4-.
,¦+¦, =>§i

|t}vw%&~T z) ,**-  3z9z.z ¯|2.+% c. )0c ME y),º»H , ¹ N-P,O/-K,Oº/ῌ+/ῌ+/῍ Hrc

C yM E .* cm = 2- HM}.

X

[j]k \ +313 ; j+ +331 )0VRzz ¯|Z7 )-.+70. c.

º+-ῌ+1ῌ+,῍ HrcX ,0 kg ha»+ )

+* kg ha»+ ",9z/. , ) ,**.   3¼¼ῌ, +, ¹ N-P,O/-K,O : *<05j#. <ZC῍ῌ+
Table +
pH
,**- 
/ῌ, uv



YZ[
cm"

ῌῌ+

RST

Fig. +

Test ﬁeld

47

RSTCQUCVWX

Chemical properties of ﬁeld soilEC

lmXijck\]^_` fg% f$% CῌN habcde" T-C" T-N"

ijck
lmno

CaO

MgO

K,O

pq
rst

mg kg)+"

ῌ"ῌ"

cmol kg)+"

mg kg)+"

mg kg)+"

mg kg)+"

ῌ"

H,O

KCL

mScm)+"*ῌ+. wQ"
 +.ῌ,. xyz",.ῌ-/ {Q"

/4+
/4/41

.4+
.4/
.42

*4*0
*4+*4*2

++1
+*
+*

-43
040
,40

*4-*4.,
*4+3

++42
+/42
+-4,

-+40
-/4*
,24.

-0-+
/**,
.0/1

22++2+
+,,0

-,*
+++-,

/043
0242*42*ῌ+/ wQ" +/ῌ,3 xyz"
,3ῌ.. {Q"

/4+
.42
.41

.4,
.4+
.4*

*4*0
*4+*4,*

+-*
1+
,.

.4,
.42
/4.

*4-.
*4-.
*4-0

+,4.
+-43
+/4,

-+4.
--4*
--4+

-/++
-.3+
-+0-

21+
+*-2
+*+*

,,+
+*2
+0*

//4*
/-43
/*4+

* .|} wQ"

04*ῌ04/ /4/ῌ04*,** ~

,* ~

2*4*

*  /01:;<=> ,**."





 N!,+ῌ" #$%&'( ., kgha)+ #*+, -. , ./012

G(45
HI
, .

-.(

/ J -* K 0 J - K?

0 J - KL

3+,(4567898 /01:;<=> ,**." #K( , .

*?

0 K 1 J ,- K( , .

@,A 2/ cm, BA ,* cm CDE + F@@,

0 J / K(4M

-.(

NH

0J-

-.O 1 J

1 J - KL

PQ

01g: h +*1 F 8,**1:

48

0 +* cm Q@~W- 7 hi!/  1  ,3  ,  2  -  



01nBC-9q:r; 8Q0aeD Q
E  UF E$ GH~I\-

    !"#$%
&'()*+,-./0.12

(3

4567 8/ 9+* : ;  8+2./<:

M..  MNHQ 0 X!Y .
QbN

BCINe$-=>>? 8+2.,<: , @$,, 

8+3.,<: 2  /90 

,T,T+ 8;

+,1 mm:  /-῍ A , 0.-῍  193   8;

0 X
X JH+ῌ)O: Q

+2+

mm: .BCD ,  ,0῍ .EMNJ K 5 LS67QM eD 

0X 8 ῌ

PGH ,* m 

. +1* m Q .3 8f+/ cm+/* cm: Q -G,

H 3* cm R S\ 2  0  ++ FGHI J

8/ῌ+:M3T 3* cm GH .* cm 7 / cm U f+* mm Q

2  ,*  +/ F 2  -+  +0 F 3  2 

 +2 F 3  -*  ,+ FKLV#  MNHOPQRSW +1 . p .* QbS

,T+T- (34UQVW 0 X!YZ".XY3QZ[

U(345Q[W- \ #]$^*+,Q7$

 %_&Q'`- \ 0 XQ0a-M.. b

E

. , H QWQ`DX[

,¡\¢] 3 £X

\4X*+,¤

c69!()6d*6GSefgE+¥+ 8TR1+S 8¦:§¨&©*¨O: QZS,67 %hiQW- \ 0 XQ-a-M.

R 

, .j".k`HN- ,  <=0 / cm, +* cm, ,* cm  /* cm

MM.GH

0 X!Y

3'+lZ"Q/ῌ, m

XY<=0 / cm, +* cm  ,* cm.

#]$^01n2345o hi6"E

bNª3'+, 8«¬^H +332: -­®¯°p 7 8-i Q$ 9q:r; 8Q <_X 8Eh: `±Q , 

=#?2a- s^ PGH 3/ m%_&Q'`- \9a[ 0  +. .²bQ³|J´X[

q:r; 8Q0ae 5>t?u2- 0 X

8/ m: Z[

.W- \

UC-,- ¶ ORP _µ : 1*, E¶ ·ª¸¹ºO: Q

<=0 .* cm Q@.W- M?uQ

bc6 v

bc6/9!()6 8wx 2

8/ῌ+: Eh '+,XY7_µ 8c:<=0 / cm, +* cm, ,* cm  -/ cm Z[

 + y:  9q:r; 8Q-ae 7 8GH,T,T, 01 %%d

i 1 0 XQz{B.|}QA\- <=01 %%d TDR 01 %XY» 8Te¹¼

ῌ,Fig. ,

U(34

\

0

X!Yk`f

Schematic diagram of groundwater control to increase soybean harvests®¯ : °N± c²#³´µ¶u ·0N¸¹Xº 
 +* cm 

  * cm +* cm !"# $%49

@* +* = +. > X* +* = ,* >, m&- $%-/M , +* ,* m&/ m '() *+ ,-./012=2>- 3456789:;< 7 / = , >?

M (0 = 3 > @A / = , >BCD7! 0 = 3 >  ?! /./ mm F( EFG H0 = - > ( IJKLMA<

0=1>, m&- N/ -/cdeN/ -@ANOPNG7!"#

cdeuvwxyz{|- 

,Q,Q- RSTUV

WX$%RSTUV? YZ+[ \]^-+ 

cde ,_`abcdefNgh HRSij+klm
nopqm +331

0N

¡¢ῌ-

$% 0 = - >EFI

£

IJKL

,Q,Q. rs)t uvcdeuvwxyz

MA< 0 = 1 > NO d#PN ,

rs{| }~?h rs 89¤ ¥¦V§¨NO0©ª +* cmL ,* uvcdeuvwxyz{|ῌFig. -« PN¬­ 2 ¬!"A ,G ¥¦V§¨NO«

0N

¡

Changes of groundwater level in test ﬁeld£[G

50 ./ cm ,, 1

 -0 cm.0 cm ?@ 3-+  ,* cm   

+ 1

1

1

,+  +2.*0.2 cm 

 +0.+2., cm  1
 +2.,-.+ cm 1,, 1-+  / !"#$% ,/2 +2.//.3 cm  2

+ 2 &'(

 +* cm ) ,/cm * 2+  2  +*  +0  +3  ,- 

\ +*1 ¼ ,**1%-+ +3 3,, 

UR 3, mm TU WX )s i*9A9O949 1,C* , %&
 f%&! O78! =qP
9 1P

J>Q*,.?)

@A=B Nyle and Ray, ,**,% +,-
C*O.D@D8P
T:178 f%&!

Olm+,- -+ * *,./ /0 2:;.1+,-?@v.1

0 1  +-..

BL

/.* cm  ,,.+1./ cm *23456*:;.1<?@v.1

1178 90 *:;.1<=D8P 7

, %&! =qP9, %Y J>)?@A.B .1C

TU9:; <<9 *1o

7D 1EF  GHIJ.j.9L WEB5qP

K*,LMN9O1D8P 2 ) %FG2,3 *7QR +,-./ mm *,L +* cm ):S

3

,-



TU

*23OV9L WX)1

CD1oqb9O%GD8P
-ῌ, ῐ῎῍ῑ῏ +..3.., cm   0....+ cm f%& 20  2-+  /9 T:178Y*Z *! ".

cm  ,,./+..  ,,.1+./ 2

1A[ \]+,-#^$_\]`Z *8P97 +* cm Y ,,.-+., abO9O1 7,,..+.,

, %&

'c0*UR'c(d*,./e97 f%& ! )**,L34gh178 &' (  0* cm !+ 2+ )?@ 1+ i  ,, cm,  ,- cm 

1+* UR),-Q+*  -3 cm,  ., cm 91,* cm Y ,,.**.2 ,,.*

*.3 97 1P , %&Yf%&

Ho ) >Q Iwq  *9A997 1P8
178 1O= *9A9O9OYD8P-ῌ-Eh ῍ῑ῏/0 I¡JK/0Y8

L j.*klm. .* cm 9

I¢LM+,- Eh D8P. q8

 1,C9, 1* £NL¤¢¥O<=+,-=¦§ Y

+,- 2

0 2

,1 2+- Yn8P UR*,

/01o.1p2qP 2-+ &' (   +* cm **,./ 34<UR*,L 2/

v.D, %&* PIJ¨©"#"

- 2





 WX% -  +-,+ +,- ,. /r5N949 1 s ,3.,+,.. cm  =  Eh /¥Qª 0+0 +*+*

 / cm RS -*3+.3 mV  HT* +* cm  ,00+1- mV 9

H / cm  .-12+ mV  +* cm  -/2+0, mV Y¢¥U*/¥ «r

i ,3.0+*./ cm  s ,0.-3.,¬a *2<<¢¥­®V3cm 

i -,.*2.+ cm 9 6t)u*Y7 Y¢¥U*9¯F 

77e8[  +* cm *?@v.1A9

L°¡C8±@5qP. )7 2

 WX =² Y=AP28P,. TU wY*L

i s+,-ixy*,49L
7*s 3+, 3J}8~P 3+ 3,+ *z{|,+ 9:;97
T:178 =>³0¢¥U*WP£­®*,.=´µ N9O1XY<9 *7Q s iO[PY9+£³0¢¥U£NL¤¢¥O¶ZqP*23O9 7*s ·¸¹º"»*,.£NL¤¢¥O

±² : ³H"´§>µ¶·¸¹JCcSoº"»V¼





%b'' `=abcde=

51>6fg"hijk#

F< !lmJnS opqr"#0sIe= F-. 

 /  , 

!"##Ltu0vwGxyz= %{| +32, ; }~$ %&ῌ. %a'' ()*+,-./0123+320 ; < +33,' VW

4/5 ῎῍6789:;0&<=> %?@<

0[ 

+320' ABC"67hJn #"0sIe= !"#J

() %0  - ' DEE-0FG H"῏6>I" %0  1 ' JKL `=<`x/ m x +/ m

H"῏F<Iu>x<=

MNO"PJQRS LTU VW0XKY-/ 

Z[ "##$J\S %+ῌ "]^_7

sV./ !Jpῌ, \S ABCῌ.
Fig. .

VWxXKp%*¦+* cm °' §>MNO"P#$

Spatial distributions of volumetric water content for surface soil (*ῌ+* cm)ῌ,Table ,


B

&ῌ.

sV./

!

Physical properties of ﬁeld soil




%cm'

P
%ῌ'

%ῌ'

%ῌ'

%ῌ'

VW

*ῌ+. % '+.ῌ,. % ¡¢',.ῌ-/ %£ '--42¤,4,34*¤*4/,14,¤+4//14/¤+41004-¤*4/0343¤.4*241¤.4*.40¤*4+,43¤,43

XK*ῌ+/ % '+/ῌ,3 % ¡¢',3ῌ.. %£ '-040¤-40-14,¤/4+,143¤+40/040¤-43/241¤,4*
1*42¤+42

VW*ῌ+0 % '+0ῌ,2 % ¡¢',2ῌ-3 %£ ',-42¤,4,-.42¤*42+/4-¤*4-

XK*ῌ+0 % '+0ῌ,0 % ¡¢',0ῌ-2 %£ ',/4*¤+42-+42¤/42+24,¤*41

ABC

, BC

ABC : § V¨©ª ,**- B /  , , BC : § V¨©ª ,**. B ++  / * «¬ῌ¦pF +.2 %0., kPa'¤ ­]®J\¯ %n«-'

P

3P

*

12

"

-

%Mgm '%cms+'+*4*¤-42-4/¤*4.
+*43¤,4-*42.¤*4**410¤*4*+*43.¤*4+*+43¥+*-¦+4,¥+*.
,4*¦-4-¥+*.
,42¥+*.¦24.¥+*2041¤*41.4*¤-4+4,¤*4-142¤+41,4*¤.434/¤*4.

*42.¤*4*,*42/¤*4**42*¤*4*0+4/¥+*.¦.4,¥+*0-4*¥+*.¦,40¥+*/-4-¥+*/¦-4*¥+*1/,4+¤-4*0,4+¤+4*
2*41¤*43,-43¤-4.
-4+¤*41-43¤*41-*4.¤,41*4.¤*42+-4/¤*40*41/¤*4*.
*42,¤*4**4/3¤*4*--4,¦04.¥+*,+42¥+*.¦-41¥+*1.4,¥+*.¦,43¥+*//04+¤*410/42¤04*1240¤*43+242¤,4/,4-¤*42-4,¤*4,,.4*¤,43*42¤+4/++4.¤*4+*413¤*4*.
*41-¤*4+1*40+¤*4*/+40¦,4.¥+*,-4-¥+*.¦,4*¥+*104*¥+*.¦043¥+*0W G

52

 

 ', !"#$%&+*1 ¼ ,**1

 2  + -./ 3  3  8 v$)*+- ,  -./)*+

012 , 34  

/..+ cm /0.2 cm XX F v$ $ (
+-.-



+-.0 8 v~ $ $8M  + w vw
AB ῌ+ $%&'

53.6786 9:; <=>^8 ?@AB !"# 53$&¥B'&M ¦ ,*** ; §¨R ,**. 3 O© 78 ,53$ (:YDN -./  

8 CDEF 53$ , 3QQ.6 ª«rs$.M¬DGT­a, 3  ~5vR 



$



XX;^ v


OPQR 012$.69:; $&ij8¤Gkl$%8 noRB 7$CDGH86 !"#
IJ8K&8 ,CDGLMN8;¡8¢£¤&.*.* cm .,.- cm 8 F  $®8 v$

+*.3++.. 8

<S ,CDG7TUABV$ WDX

  F7$53$ ~

:YDNZ[\]^_M`a8

QB t¯vO©D°± ²8&V$~

WD\bcdefg_M$ CDG&\MQ ,\53.h8CDG ³AB QBRQR ~i $IJ8K&´VRB8&?@AB

ij$kl_MQ m noRB pq$

-}0}, -./µ ¶O4rst iju ABMQR :YDN

ῌ- $v$-M·|8µ

u vw$xRy3w\z{'u _MQ\^ 53 , 37$ ¸

| G noRB+ ¹F-0  



¸

 $'º8 F$%&'SM53¶ /+/  m»,  

 .-3  m», $ +1ῌ º , 3-}0}+ ~i~i$%&' ῌ/ $^ 53ῌ/
Fig. //*,  m», ~i 



 ..1  m», $ +,ῌ º-./F

Development of main stem length and node per plant»¼ : {|#}:@F*kLM#!

ῑῒῌ+
Photo +

4 3ῌ-* ^_  : 53

 : 

The appearance of soybeans at maturing stage (-* September)ΐῌTable -.:;<.R

Growth, yield and yield component

4¡¢

.£<.R



¤
p

¥¦
mm

§
kgm,

kgm,

-
ῌ

¨©
g

+ ῌf©1©ῌ+

ῌ1
ῌ m,






/40
/4/

2414*

*4/1
*4.0

*4,2
*4,-

+,/
+**

-,4/
-+41

+42,
+41.

/+/
.-3

,






.42ª*4+/4*ª*4.

04/ª+4+/40ª*4/*4..ª*4*2*4-1ª*4*.

*4,0ª*4*/*4,,ª*4*,

++0
+**

,24*ª*4,,24+ª*40+42+ª*4*.
+41/ª*4*.

/*,ª2..1ª.2,,

 : «¬­ 0 H - ­ 234 1 H ,,5,2 ­  ­  +* H +. ­  +* H ,* ­ : «¬­ 0 H / ­ 234 1 H ,/ ­52 H + ­  ­ +* H 2 ­
®ij¯U0A Tukey °;,E±E²³´ ? ª1µ ¶·¸´k¹m nº-  *.,2 kg m, 

 *.,- kg m,  ,/ῌ  , *.,0 kg m,  *.,, kg m,  +0ῌ   !"  #$% &'%#(%)*+,  #$%#(%-.
/0&'%
ῌ1234567894:;<=74 >
,efghijklmFnCoF

.ῌ ῍ ῐ ῏ ῎pqr:;<stuvqrklwxy7z{?@ABCDEF0GEA0F
4IJ567894

QEX LM#!IY7Z[00\]^_.`a bc LM#!d[;F

2 H23 =74?@A|#} |#῍~#!kCZF#῍k" *kmLM#!k  

*+#kRmF

K0LM#! #NOPA

234IJ567894 :: 2 H + H L

0FQRSTUVWXEM +* cm #!C qr f © +*1 ¼ w,**1

54

 

῏ ῎ !

irsj?<,- t\fk"  # +-..$/.* cm % ,,.+$1./ cm 

ulviwx lymnXoz{p|]q}(*~&'()

(*+r    ly\ῌstil\- .

/' !"01) ,,2#345601!"# 78 9:!" ;<  w ly\  u tvwxJKy tz{ |6}xr~@ "G?

90=>!?<90"#,) ( $8%&0?<ῌ ῑ ῐ ῍'() (@ #%&' !"01- AB#*)

ly\ῌs w,**. : , C 0D+!",#E-:.F*

6</G!01)

]q] pp. 2ῌ+*.

w,*** : -$t pp. +ῌ

,-/ \~ 

01H2῔(*B<34I5  #%&' 667 2῔(*

6} w+331 : 6}pp. ,+ῌ,., pp. .2ῌ03, pp. +3/ῌ+31, pp. ,*,ῌ,*.,B-JK896#AB56 

pp. ,*2ῌ,++, pp. ,+/ῌ,+0, pp. ,,,ῌ,-+, pp. ,01ῌ

6>!7<90#L(#M,03   ,:;@H 0%:<

N=50>OP:;@?-D'8 QR@< N=50>OP&+0DA81)

: w,**- : AhQj!ῑῐQ FOEAS
\t3 : 2 ῏ ,/ pp.  +*,2  ,ῌ+*,2  1 \~  B< S=5 N=5 >OP iῌEῌ w+33, : +

#'8 T=5%#'81) CUD + @<!ῑῐ2 f 0. : ++ῌ

0D:<CEV01- QR@<
71W 18 B<C' <"01)
FXY   %+ 0D!"W  71,Z1()
,2Ft] w\  % 71W .F*6[F\JKL
2MN6 ]^<F_`a#O1 9
0#6()

Q¡eE w+320 : +I6 f /- : +-ῌ+3.
 E῎ῌ¢£¤ῌ¥ Eῌ¡¢¡£¤ῌῒ¦¢ῌI§¨¥ w+320 : 22

,:0D #%&

§e

D

&+῍) cV ΐD-1ῌ.*.

, C 0D #%-*)  '(ª¯¤ῌW  #%- ,/῍ ,

 +0῍

X01)
 de- 2῔0"YZ [-7¬¨y\­©ilrsª®
°± w+322 :

:

3ῌV

ῌ´ῌ²@<!(«µ w,**. : W+ @<6

|µ?¶· )¶ 1/ : +2/ῌ+3*.

#F\´·!¸E῎ῌ¹º¯ w+322 : +

1 /G(*6N! `a:(«§e \t .- : +,/ῌ+,1.

6^g&pbNc1hijklm<$n_\ῌ»\ῌst¹ w+31, : («#0 B<#C>!?</G#W&,- !"e qf%&#gh56-. :¬­®ῌ² ¯ῌ°±³ῌ¢3²-ῌῌ³0<῔2 \f$ ]?!

#]d56 !"^g CE :< \t .- : +,1ῌ+,3.

"^g3 !"Khijklm#
7<n_,<90 !"o 71W @<  © , ª01ῌ01«U1*¦==A8 RDSTU,) PcQ RD0 pp.

+ῌ+,*.

GH! / cm, +* cm :I Eh bPcQ,*.

22Ft] w+313 : 2

@<¸
pp.

+3ῌ,,.

\ῌs» w,**0 : \ῌs¼º»l http : //www.
ma#.go.jp/www/info/index.html.
Nyle C Brady and Ray R Well (,**,) : The Nature andh7 : @6!78ef#:Agh'< jkli

Properties of Soil Thirteenth Edition : pp. +/,ῌ55

on leaf chlorophyll content, root growth and yield.
Jpn. J. Crop Sci., 0. : ,3.ῌ-*-.

+/3.

ῌ ῌῌ

ῌ

Shimada, S., Kokubun, M. and Matsui, S. (+331) : E#ects+332 :  of Water Table on Physiological Traits and Yield

of Soybean. II. E#ects of water table and rainfall!"#  $ %& & 2* :on leaf water potential and photosynthesis. Jpn.

--ῌ.*.

'(ῌ ῌ)*+,ῌ-./ῌ01ῌῌ23 +321 : 45
6!78 !9"#:;$ % - &'< =(>?@AB )CD*E+FGHIJ&
KB -/ : ,+ῌ,-.

QR& *E!"#ST& /1 : 113ῌ12-.
2U1ῌ-./Vῌ0W0ῌ1-X2ῌY.1
ῌZ3ῌ45[ῌ6\2 +331 :Shimada, S., Kokubun, M. and Matsui, S. (+33/) : E#ects
of Water Table on Physiological Traits and Yield
of Soybean. I. E#ects of water table and rainfall

῍?IJab&

J. Crop Sci., 00 : +*2ῌ++1.

,LM +32, : >56!78'<NOP]& pp. +3,ῌ+3/& 7W8^9& :_B;;ῌ#<ῌ2=W> ,**+ : *'`]&

pp. .,ῌ./& 7W8^9& :_Bῌ

cd@aef#:Agh'< ijkh9"lmlin l

mBo lmc& pqrCDs b& #tEFG>u8vwxyz{ HIw 2 | 6'< 'JK< +* cm 6LMh& }~Bo }~c& NDs b& 'J< 2* cm aD
O>hn& OAab& 2 |lmc'< b}~c6P=t n , OAb 2 |QN 3 |6N7lmcP}~c6P='< > n ef , OR7Sc TUV>WbOAR7X"=t& 'POan Yb& OZ6Sc>6 T!"# TP> & Tab  b[ Nn ef\b& SO>\wZ]h& & ^a}~cP_& ¡¢£blmcP}~c6P

OAa ,/ ῍`:> n , OAb +0῍ `:> nx¤¥>N& 1aBoa¦§6'< \¨wa©Hª«¬Pa8­b®8¥>&¯c Ejk6P°±d ©Hª«¬6"8`:­bPge²n ³& '<
jk6!b& Y T>&  TfY6´µu8Bo¶·P£Ga®& Bo'< O¸FGP¹º²n»¼O|g : ,**1 O 1 | +* g
»O|g : ,**1 O 3 | ,+ g
J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
^¼f%
No. +*1, p. /10+ ,**1   *On Homogeneous Packing of Dry Particles
Takeyuki ANNAKA** Faculty of Agriculture, Yamagata University, +ῑ,- Wakaba-machi,
Tsuruoka, Yamagata, 331ῑ2///, Japan}/  Bw +.1 cm ~1 BCCE,+       
"#

$%&'

D<E%F:;E%_@0 - 1<*



E  D<*E  .  EE

  !

% .q - FG/0 - 1 " 9 -  *,()*+,-% .Annaka<E%"$UH@H 9 - * + DJK%

and Hanayama, ,**/ ,**1 ; ῌ ,**0/0 <K%0 % D " IC&' 12 , 34567 8$%9H#(]E+MH"D<b"@:; <"=>?@0 A $%

0 t=E,$" @0 *! BC $,D<E FGH1ῌ

 ῌ < =*L:;* ῍ qZ <567 IJK,2L =Q@H:;<J b$ ῎&'*M&N-%0 EE9# K%"%O P< :;K-Mot=@H ":; E%0 8$%# !"Q <

LM=@ ῏ D+MH<"K-*" :;*R!S"=#T:;=N ῐ DDb  <&'=UM$*M*+%0 % $VW%#"&WOK"_ ;; PD9Db<OK%#"XY#567 <Z  I [H$:;=N0

JK"$VW% [+,'\E%(]"&W%)Q -" <PMJK"[HK$(]=*+E ^Q,-=.Q"_`ab-*:;=N= (]DbRb=q

%0

 S*S"*+,$"@0 T

8$%#<Z .Q%c/ 0dQ¡¢

%(]1 < .I/ JK" U ["1e .micro-layering/ 223 .segregation/ "E(]£<V¤W¥Uij"$UH¦,4,$fg=h@ .5KL Lebron and0 q%T #§K<:;N%T9' "Robinson, ,**-/0 ij%T

E,I .</ JK"=;Xklm

n .randomizer/ .Glass et al., +323/  $%<=),$

.YZ|¨© ,***/0 % ª«D< E

6o@+%0 7p 8$%(]<Z, Db"< F¬ *<R;=

"* 9892<<:; ­®E [[<:;<F¬ =\$":;=bM

 8$%(]D<Z .Q0d *:]$":;=K-M*"¯M4,$&;c5" qr=s>@klm

'c&@ .Kolbuszewski, +3.2/0 c& #°nR!"otuv0, 

^U¨ [_%T±9`²"³´ µb,-% .Miura and Toki, +32, ; Rad and Tumay,+321/0,+ 

,,   ?ῑ+  (w *.-x*.0 mm 8$%y# .@z{A|?ῑ,  Qy# $, 989 =D<* ¶SK¨a¨b ·331ῑ2/// ¶S¸c¹º»de +ῑ, : (] < :; :; klmn

2º 1 » +*1 ¼ «,**1­58

ῌ+ {  '% ©ª
Table +

Bulk densities of di#erently packed,
dry sand.

' «g cm¬-­

'

4

- |?
- |U+* ¯- |U,* ¯

)®*p

+4,11
+4.++4..+4/-* ?

*4**0
*4**0
*4**0
*4*+*

ῌ  *.- mmt*.0 mm s « v ,.0/ g cm¬- ;­ °ῌ +.1 cm r ,/ cm  ±²z7f[h : r ,* cm 3&'
ῌ- +
ῌ+

ῌ, _` ³?{  '
Table ,

Bulk densities of di#erently prepared,
packed dry sand.





+

  

,**.
,**/

,1
+/

' «g cm¬-­
4
+4//+
+4/+*

*4*,0
*4*+/

,**.
,**/

-0
+2

+4/1/
+4/2,

*4*+3
*4*+-

H,O, 

,**.
,**/

//
-/

+4//0
+4/,-

*4*,,
*4*,+

\S ῌ, '4bfgh

L, lm Si jk+ OnoWXYZ[T',016%?", d p+qr s

+ *.-t*.0 mm ?

 ,

 E% u! 01r+ vw x01
6 "5,yP?z"%R78-  -+  { |T }~K+ '  

?7  ' B#o?$49 ,

 ( )*+  Sῌ, + *.. mm [% *.-t*.0 mm

,% H,O, -$',./01(s +* cmUr -* cmUV>1 +.* cm% 2  3 

WXYZ['

78%% ]-^_`:  0 a[bc d8e8 ῌ !"#$%&'Comparison of sand bulk densities
packed in the column and chamber.

;´µ %+¶,
sd 33-{´µ %+.]-^·/-#"´H,O, µ %+ /῍H,O, 0¸1ῌH,O,   +.1 cm

Fig. +

)®*p

  

{  ]-^WXYZ[T &' ;
]-^_`-$ 0 a[bc4¹6N

- 4 5, 6

9 ῌ 9:  ,ῌ+ % 

 (  '

 %& 
z + f[h; 01 ( (%+ <=>?@ 5,

 { : &rWXYZ[!A%?"(% B?CD : ῌE FG%@"  [HῌIJ:KL MN,O# P+ f[hP &49?','+?(%Q " (%, %& Fz7(u1

%R78

Sῌ+ +  +.1 cm
 +* cmU V>1 *.0 cm

z s

+ }~ ¡¢k,9£¤ , ¥,- 

T'%WXYZ[T'¦,(%,§§yP S?%&,r8 (8+ &'#o?|, r8 ¨¶h :  OP!)*ED

ῌ,

59

¨H©ª(
!)*A«!¬=!>?!­?B¨H©ª( )*A5¬=®¯°@  ±)*A5¬=>?@­?B./²

Fig. ,

Visualized heterogeneity of packed glass beads and sand-, 

ῌ-  

!"#$%&'()*+,-./01234!56
 78 9:; <!= >?@-ABCDE FG!H&IJKL(M  N OP!QRS EH&IJKL(TUVWXY!3@Z[4\]^/O_ ,`@ab@ , cdef!OP"#gh)* + >?-AB 7micro-layering<ijklm 7segregation< no\/

  7pq +33/ ; Makse et al., +331 ; Lebron andRobinson, ,**-< ῌ- ./ 0123

b@OP:rst56lmj4!56/u _ ,!b@OPvwxyz

50123:r  {|}!xy~ 7Oyama, +3-3<
56 !  14n:N@ῌ-"#lm!3P³8!0123´E\/²
8 9: OTS ;4! µY\/²

Fig. -

Segregation of mixed sand.

7H& ,**,<.  !QR)*=U,-./  OP
U >?-ABijklm !
5

!

 $%&'(!U3@.5OP.U,-@ j)*5/ >?!,-C 
 

 





 !E!¡¢H&IJKL(

7randomizer< 56 £¤¥- ¦§M H´µ¶·ª ¸ +*1 ¹ ,**1

60 

ῌ.      ,  !"#$%& '()*+,-' ./ 012
3456789:;<=>;?&'

@A

9

&
ῌ/ B CDEF.G HIJ

9%KL%M(NOPQ(RS <& CD9TUV

WEFKXYZ<B [\L]HIJ9%K@I^;(& 7_ CDWEF`aH
IJ9%KBbcQ(d YZefgQR9hf
9G &
ijk[lmn Cop
DB Glass et al. +323 <& qQB r)D012YZstsu  st_v
wxn

yFilling and Packing Apparatusz {|} ~

& (B 012r)EFS& &7;ijkῌῌ.

C

(DEF

Fig. .

Illustration of the randomizer used in
the chamber experiment.

[\L]9SRQ<G S9
 )B;RQ$%;( nQd7G &c WEF


HIJ%K^&'

¡

9G<& ¢ Glass et al. +33* <B - £¤¥C¦st<ῌῌ/ C§D¨©.&HIJ7ª«¬) *.- mm­*.0 mm EFK ijk[® ¯ BCD
dWEF `a</HIJ%K^°±<&® ² BCEF`a<& gQR9YZef  n/79EF³
&®
Fig. /

E#ect of a randomizer on packing homogeneous sand layer.

»Q : y? 67* f¼u

  Geiger and Durnford ,***  
 Rad and Tumay +32/

61

Geiger, S.L. and Durnford, D.S. (,***) : Inﬁltration inhomogeneous sands and a mechanistic model of

unstable ﬂows. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 0. : .0*ῌ.03.

 raining !"#$%&'( )*

Glass, R. J., Steenhuis, T.S. and Parlange, J-Y. (+323) :+, - ./0 1 .2# 

Wetting front instability : ,.Experimental deter-raining+3 4+ Kolbuszewski +3.2 

mination of relationships between system pa-

567

8#

rameters and two-dimensional unstable ﬂow

 $%&' 9,:; <+=>? +@A

BC

#D *EF
GH+  IJ  ?

ﬁeld behavior in initially dry porous media.
Water Resour. Res., ,/ : ++3/ῌ+,*1.
Glass, R. J., Cann, S., King, J., Baily, N., Parlange, J-Y.

K2+LMNOPQ  RS K2 TUand Steenhuis, T.S. (+33*) : Wetting front insta-

E V=W OPQ  RS

bility in unsaturated porous media : A three-

X+ Y2UZAKUZAC8W9.

dimensional study in initially dry sand. Trans-

#X

0 [\Y2 ]8\ ^_U

port in Porous Media, / : ,.1ῌ,02.

!` +33/ 7KUZ "Zabcd#+U

IJª ,*** : )«%0 ¬ K7­®L"_W$e8Cf ? 7%.< /g

M K 2 ¯ ) GῌGY%0 pp

K. 8 J& hi[\e& j' RS Y2+-0ῌ+./ N©

W.k. e&+ ]8\ lm8C9k
E

Kolbuszewski, J. J. (+3.2) : An experimental study ofthe maximum and minimum porosities of sands.
Proc. ,nd International Conference on Soil Me-/ῌ ῍ ῐ ῏ ῎chanics and Foundation Engineering vol. +, Lon-

Pnop_' (q+[\)r*67E

don : +/2ῌ+0/.

st.u )r + )67,

Lebron, I. and Robinson, D.A. (,**-) : Particle size

v.A kwk#KxC 9 y

segregation during hand packing of coarse gran-) $e*+=>-z *67{ |'_U2

ular materials and impacts on local pore-scale}.U :; )~67kwk#

structure. Vadose Zone J., , : --*ῌ--1.

 9E 8 /{ U)0WF2

Makse, H.A., Havlin, S., King, P.R. and Stanley, E.

# #+[1) *672A (+331) : Spontaneous stratiﬁcation in granular

2U /3 45+ῌ6 Ufk#

Miura, S. and Toki, S. (+32,) : A sample preparation
method and its e#ect on static and cyclic defor-ῑ ῔ ΐ ῒ+7ῌ89: ,**0 : )mation-strength properties of sand. Soil and

9>



(+|'U ;< {+U =)>?@ ,.+ : +.3ῌ+/*.
Annaka, T. and Hanayama, S. (,**/) : Dynamic waterentry pressure for initially dry glass beads andsea sand. Vadose Zone J., . : +,1ῌ+--.
Annaka, T. and Hanayama, S. (,**1) : Pressure headproﬁle within growing ﬁngers in initially dry
glass beads. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1+ : 3*+ῌ3*2.

¡A

mixtures. Nature, -13 : -13ῌ-2,.

+¢

£ῌ¤B

¥C ,**, : DEF pp. ,*/ῌ,.. ¦§¨G ©H

Foundations, ,, : 0+ῌ11.
Oyama, Y. (+3-3) : The motion of binary particle ina horizontally rotating tube. Bull. Inst. Phys.
Chem. Res. Jpn. Rep., +2 : 0**ῌ0-3.
Rad, N.S. and Tumay, M.T. (+32/) : Factors a#ecting
sand specimen preparation by raining. Geotechnical Testing J., +* : -+ῌ-1.

!`°± +33/ : )(² ³*x´ +µ¶?· N©¸¹OºP : ,**1 O 2 º ,3 P
¸FOºP : ,**1 O +* º / P




J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
¼ T
No. +*1, p. 0- 11 ,**1

 *ῌ*Soil Water Hydraulic Functions for a Sandy Soil and an Aggregated Soil
Masaru SAKAI* and Nobuo TORIDE*
Abstract
The Fayer and Durner models, which modiﬁed the water retention curve of the van Genuchten(VG) model, combined with the statistical pore-size distribution model of Mualem were used to
predict unsaturated hydraulic conductivity functions of Tottori dune sand and aggregatedKumamoto Andisol. Parameters of the Fayer and Durner models, as well as the VG model, wereinversely estimated with the evaporation method. The Fayer model well described unsaturated
hydraulic conductivity for the dune sand reﬂecting pore water retention for higher water contents and absorbed water retention on the surface of soil particles for lower water contents. The
Durner model was suitable to the Andisol whose hydraulic properties were strongly a#ected withthe distinct the aggregated structure.

The Mualem model can predict unsaturated hydraulicconductivity for a wide range of soil water pressure when an appropriate model is used for thewater retention curve and the pore-connectivity coe$cient, l is estimated. Furthermore, it wasalso suggested that we need to use an appropriate soil water retention function to predict unsaturated hydraulic conductivity for much smaller pressure heads than the minimum pressure
head observed during the evaporation experiment.
Key words : soil water hydraulic function, Mualem model, Fayer model, Durner model, evaporation method

Lo,pLqr<kEZo sD=5tE uGQ+     

 ῐ

v_ wxc_y\,-B\ . Kosugi +330  t

ῌ q ῐ h!"#$ q % h

&z{ |MNYZ}~ | ! 5_
TKLUVW<kYB\ .

& '(ΐ) &*+,- . /012345
6789 :;89<*+ &=>?5@AB '(ΐ<CDE FG!"#$'(ΐ)

&<H-I-ῑJKL&MNE OPQ .
R!"#$'(ΐ) & ῎S<&TUVW

5@XMNYZ&& soil water

hydraulic function @[-B\Jury and Hor-!"#$5]\B ^_ UVWQ`ab-B\ . c_d,-ZUVWBrooks and Corey!"#$& efLghij<kE. lZ van Genuchten +32*

UVW S mn

5tY '(ΐ) & D ^_ ῒῐ}<PE . 5 ῏ '(ΐ) & D5 . HR _p,)

&<E!"#$5\B'(ΐQL-BZ. H^_

  ! < }~ |! MNYb,5
'(ΐ)

ton, ,**0.

+30.

!"#$Q K5D

3῍-<E&<E}~R5@X|UVW

Childs and Collis-George, +3/* ; Burdine, +3/- ; Mualem,+310 ; Jury and Horton, ,**0. R @L$ῌ'(ΐ)

&ῑUVW '(ΐ)!"#
&¡Q¢,-B\ FG5£\BxTK¤¥5\Z* ¦§¨©¨©ª«¬­©®¯° ±/+.ῌ2/*1 ¦§²³´µ¶·¸· +/11 :
& Mualem UVW Fayer UVW Durner UVW ¹º»º@A" » +*1 ¼ ),**1,64 

22"aST4 Fayer ST4Durner ST4    W,- OVO Fayer ST4 Durner ST4OD 

! "# $k.N[2%%&0 7'%& "'( )*+ ,**1,-  ./0¡8'g¢£¤2- g%

12 3456789:;<%!

¥¦"=>?@AB ! "#H I

CD >EF"G

Durner ST40O#hi¤<%

S

7B

C 5§¨ D ~ 1O%©ª«

Mualem )+310, NO%PQRST4D# Fayer ST4:

-

)Eching and Hopmans, +33- ; Àimůnek
Set al., +332 ; JKῌLM ,**1,-!

O;¥¬¤ ;W`

Fayer ST4 Durner ST4O%-

T4UV1>?>': WGX"O  ;z9u(:­OY&Z[2%\¥®#=>? %W hi# 

#[2

)*+CW` 22ST4

,**1,- van Genuchten )+32*, D  
Mualem ST4]O >?

~ AW1 ¯0"l¡8O%-

 ^_> )closed-form, W`#O%- C van, 

Genuchten !% ῎"aST4 )bc VG ST4, D dST4 ef I` g% #hij"W&1V I %& kB/012
OVO)*+ ,**1,-

Mualem )+310, D

VG ST4OB0K)Se,±KsKr῍ ῎῏ + dS ῒ ῐ ῍ + dS῏±KsSle ῐe
῎ῑῌ h)Se, eΐ ῑῌ h)Se, ῐ

,

q&rUs

' qr tO u()c* qr v.



PQRST4O°_ %-

lV$m'n%[2A` opST4'N[2 - VG ST4 D

Mualem,+\ #[2 - qr D!  O w

CCO %& )L T +, Kr D Ks 

VG ST4D qr .x%)+y

K D )L T +, Ks D

 ) , Se D

C'n%[²; ) ,l DPQa )pore-connectivity)Tuller and Or, ,**+ ; *+ ,**1,-  (coefficient, ), h D u( )L,A z*,{
2

ῌ



u(



D

'|})cO qr v.

~

VG ST4'pO0,{$ u(-D.- Fayer and Simmons )+33/,
D +yA qr v.

#O l±*./ O - ῌ _ Mualem ST4
O  h )Se,    K  h I
D Se O

 D0 u('+*1 cm $/' *  WG

q&rUs' qr opO%!

C'$ - C῎"aST4W` "

VG ST4"

I - Mualem)+310, D ./ ³<B ´=O0O >µ"?¶% #

C'

$ -

O%g%  ' S \^,,  ῌ 

VG ST4D ""0# $ B,,+- % 1'O%# Mualem ST4·x0

D 1PPQ

van Genuchten῎

,3

"aST4 kB/0[2 B

3  )451 ,**/,  C'' van Genuchten )+32*, 'NO% van Genuchten

12PQA  "' %&- Durner )+33., D 1 WG
1[2

"V

 6 VG ST4O)VG, ST4 I - VG ST4D°_ CW` 3  #q qr±Se±)+¸¹ah¹n, m
qs qr

O%Fayer and Simmons ST4

AW Durner S

CC

q DrUs' )L- L -,T4lB Mualem ST40O% )L L ,

῎"aST4'[2

)

)bc 

 

 -

-

-

,

῍
qr Dq&rUs'

qs DrUs' )L- L -,m )±+a )L +,n+ῌn, D ^  ·¸ῑ¹ : rºH£IHR689·y »¼ ῍ 

ῌ

Mualemῒ





!"#



ΐ+ $a%  {| 3ΐ+ fpqrsr dz<? ῐ

K$Se%&KsSle'+($+(Se+ῌm%m),

6N_`a f ?* ῐ

 +  , <2f1?

* qr&* 1? VG

῎

65

 $῍

 + % e HTU

῍ῌB<2Ni6,ῌ,ῌ,Fayer ῎῍῏ 

VG

* +,-./0 qr 12345#

B<2 h , * h(.* cm
RR12 Se

3

AHTU῍ῌa

67 689:1;<=>?@ A6

b 3412< ;  + ῌB ῒ CDEF $Tuller and Or,9=>12<?AHTU῍ῌB N6 ,**+ ; DG ,**1% Fayer and Simmons $+33/% *Y

HIJ3K LMN OP1 $Campbell and Shiozawa, +33,% ῏QRSHTU῍67

;VW VG



qr

XY1?



*

Z[

Fayer and Simmons

 $ῌ

Mualem6N_`a $῏

K$Se%&KsSle'Gs$h%ῌGmax),'+\]ah]n)(m\c$h%qaῌqs

῏^^ Gs $h%  Gmaxῑ^^ qa *6N_`a b :cd


,ῌ,ῌ-

Durner ῎῍῏

VG



Rossi

and

Nimmo $+33.% * +*/g++*h iRjk /*ῌQl

῏RSU῍12 hm&(+*1 cm

f12< mno*pqrsr tuvRwxy OP1
2 hm&(+*0 cm~

z<? ${| .. + }% 5" ῏!"#>*ῐ + f  ῏

Fayer


6N_`a* S ¡¢

b

f?

@ £I¤¥ ¦§1?H¨"# , © ª©b 
6N_`a*34;< Durner $+33.% * «VG a x^ ¬© 6N_`a341? mno* £I ­® ¯ , N° ±>1 , 

VG



x1?

 R² ^ 6N_`a* 

qῌqs&Se&'+\]ah]n)(m\+('+\]ah]n)(mc$h%qaῌqs

ῑf5#6N_`aΐῒ῎e c$h%&+(ln$(h%ῌln$(hm%  hm * q&*;῏QRSHTU῍ f%%  ῒ !"#

1?
qῌqs&Se&$+(c$h%qaῌqs%



VG

ῐ

35#

ῐῌ+$a% Fayer $῏ %  $b% Durner $ῒ %
6N_`a 3
,  N° : ³a*  +  ³´a*  ,  ta* ,  ῒ $µ%¶

Fig. +

Two di#erent regions for water retention of (a) the Fayer model (eq. (.)) and (b)the Durner model (eq. (1)) : dashed and chain lines indicate the ﬁrst and second
terms of the right-hand side of the equations, respectively, and solid lines
indicate the sum of the two terms (left-hand side).

»IJH66

ῑῌ++*1 ¼ ,**1()*+uEN(¶FH !"#GSE ;=·%(
Mualem +310 =7:hS  l H¸E¹

Table +

 Ks uE0

Soil water hydraulic parameters of the VG, Fayer, and Durner models ﬁt to the observed soil
water retention curves, the observed saturated hydraulic conductivity Ks, and the poreconnectivity coe$cient l presented by Mualem (+310).

Tottori dune sand

qr

qa

qs

a cm+nw,a, cm+n,Ks cm d+l

VG modelFayer model
Durner model

*4*-*
º
*4**,

º
*4*2/
º

*4-.+
*4--0
*4--1

*4*-/
*4*-0
*4*-0

/4,*
14*0
040-

º
º
*4*,

º
º
3430e+*.

º
º
+4/

//*
//*
//*

*4/
*4/
*4/

Andisol
VG modelFayer model
Durner model

*
º
*

º
*41/.
º

*4103
*41,.
*41..

*4+3,
*4*.*
*4*.+

+4+.
+.43,
,4..

º
º
*4/3

º
º
+4*+e+*.

º
º
+4.1

,**
,**
,**

*4/
*4/
*4/

fg ῎ '0 ῏ 'CK()*+ῐ$%(

qqr
Se
qsqr

(h-./$ Durner -./0w++ahnmw,+a,hn,m,

 w


 w+w,+  ῐ+ bῐ+  !"#$%& ῎ '()*+$ ,&
 Fayer -./0 ῎ '1

ῐ+ a+ 20,2

3%456& 1+2

;<7:($6;=> h+,*** cm ,

7 89:7

?4(@( A 1
:7

,2

BC9

($6 DEFG@ h+,*** cm

(H$ ῍ ' Fayer -./;%4GI=J4>KLK2@MN6
4 Durner ()*+O

($ ,P6, 3Q9(HR6STU064V&W, 32()*+NP >K

LK-./Q9 6X6-ῌ ῏ ῐ ῒ῎

-./05Q9 ,3(YZ064(H$V6&-./
 [ C\  !"#]%O-ῌ+ ῏ῐ῎῍i) *jklk0$%& ῐ,mnop

qr+ sG,+ tEG+u-6&()*+ klk()*+h῍/* cm (@vw g6

yzX g.$,*῍hx/* cm 

/(G!b;%

4zz{0_Y_@|\K@}9~h῍+,*** cmsG,+ /1\ +33/ u-6 hx

+,*** cm

tEG+ 2ῌ/1 +32. u-6&&W u-93_Z9XJ&`H5 W
4u-+%0\K A  459 , 0()*+$ ;%4hx+/* cm I

?4sG,+u-6

&
t6

klk 7 rb+.0, g cm- 0 rb*..2 g cm- $ >KLK -.2 cm  Durner -./ ^9()*+Y_$

C 2 cm,  1.2 cm C +2.0 cm / 

0@`a Fayer -./ (!b$"86 op$%49g($ ^ 

+V6&Y_$058 - :7X<4;6& ; op

Durner ()*+O ῎ ' $ Mualem -.

$a<64i)g=$&6 i)>B/ ῌ ' #0 c$%( O&¡$%4A-?$49@\t6$¢£CU& k

Y'd@'\K Priesack and Durner, ,**0lk ¤C *./ + , - / cm,  ¤C /./+*./ +/./ cm @¥¡¦!"#$(3§¨

KSeKsw+ Se+w, Se,l
+ῌm m
+ῌm m
w+ a++Se+ w, a,++Se, ,
w+ aw, a,,,e

6 GA©ª$%4/(G$u-6& ,῏ «$B¬CD­@6

A®X\¯°t6$±W& GA©ª B¬CD

Campbell ²

."#n³" CR+*** ´µ6 i)/(G+·,- : ©¸u¹.:qV,F+º»l ¼/

ῑῌ,XaY ¨h©ª© XbY «./0 ,*¬­® : ¯x°4!{ !® ±®
t±²®4¤U³U Fayer  Durner  VG 5V´µ­®¶Fig. ,

Water retention curves for (a) Tottori dune sand and (b) Kumamoto Andisol :open circles are the observed data, and solid, dashed, and chain lines describe
the ﬁtted curves described with the Fayer, Durner, and VG model, respectively.

  V    !

 
"#
+,

67

 $%&'( ) qave 

*(- ./0 12 3

 E ~4w%x0y ~(h 
῍(h Z+῏mKvh
W*῎(z ῐzWmL(z zWmLmKXhY

4  56 784'9 :;[[  L 4 ? XLY<=>H-H)4 " , 4 *-ῌ, ῏῎ΐ?@ L

K AH
$%&

A<=

,

BC:; DE ,FG'9H
IJ + KL ,MFN HO ,
F4 EP QRSTG @UV(q(ῑ῍(h Z+῏ΐWKXhY῎(z ῐ῔(t(z ῒῐ[[  t 4\] XTY z 4^_` a]b XLY
c6 A

cV ,MFN 
cV

<= q   ~4-ῌ,ῌ+ ῒ῕῍῔ῐ

,

῔
ῑ

*

cV d

 ,MF+eQ

XRassam et al., ,**. ;#= ,**0Y(h ῌ
῍(h ῏῏mKXhY῎(z Z+ῐzW*mKvh (z zW*WEXtY῍
XhX*tYhAY ῑ῕῏῎
hX*tYWhA[[  ,MFN H-H)4 " , 4 *῕ G4 A O,3 h X*cV ῑ

tY $3 hA XLY 56_Hu_4 RSTG4KG @UV XPhilip and de Vries, E XL Tm+Y

+3/1 ; fgῌhi ,**0Y  A  ) h X* tY (q(ῑ῍(h Z+῏ZK (hΐWKXhY῎(z ῐ vh (z῔
(t
(z ῒ

ῒ
ῑ

Kvh 43j5V,MBkl XL Tm+Y

c6

hA 

tw%x0y ~ )



h X* tYWhA

t3 ~) qV c6  E 4t{V t% cV

 5V%

Vs4tuv  sj5V,Mw%x00y !"¡!¢qV[u£& cV

y4z

¤[

hXz*YWhiXzY

'9

) 

l{ |}~4 3 hi XzY  ΐῑ$%&E4,w%x0yH5!)H

w%x E \]'~u$3 hA 4 ¥

V(¦


4!

 4 A< 

no4 , pq -'9 4 !"-r_V§6@H{u ) hAWm+*0 cm ¤ }]

)hX*tYhAc

6 'w%x0y E XtY 5)!   »HI¦ 2 +*1 ¼ $,**1-68

50 s E , A>/01 nE -,, 

vE8+ῌ$nEsE - (7^? 34 , 4 pq



r Levenberg-Marquardt 4 $Marquardt, +30--, F     !"# qave $%&%

 0- '( *.*03 cm- cm)- *+, ,*2 ')-( *..0 cm cm - ".M

 Ecum $ti- %&% *+, , >?@? Fayer / $qa ,/01 2345 $6ῑ,-  7

qs , a, n, Ks , l- Durner / $qr , qs , a, n, w,, a,, n,, Ks ,

-



k

s  F ARST015l- RST01
ῐ

ῑ῏

῏ΐῌ

῎ΐῌ

F8 ῔ vpj ῔ wp9p*j $ti-)pj$ti-:,67ks c $XYῌZ[ ,**1- 234;wq9q*ave)qave:,

῏
ῌ

ῑ῍

5 pqr $'i .. + h- (Qe UR
῏  F
ST01A <c ῌ;vE ῔ wE9E*cum$ti-)Ecum$ti-:,῎ΐῌksU <A 6

7!"# qs  8!F

2345t 679/01

ῑῒ;vq$h- ῔ wq$h-9q$h-*)q$h-:, !¡\/01J $%&% *+,A῎ΐῌ<<( = * >?@?5AB.Ct pj $ti- D5 j E ti

F  mt67  cD5 nj D5 jF/01

5 $'i .. + h ῑ+- (Qe URS

F". (G wp , wq ,T01A £¤O l  234¥Ecum $ti- E ti

wE, wq$h- >?@?  h῍)-* cm-   :;  67< Ks

a<¢ k!"# ".A=>?67< ¦HI" 234/01 HIJK(G L

MRST01(Gc URST01A _M ,  /01NJOPQRST01U

VG / § t:; RST01 $qr , qs , a, n, Ks ,<A( RST01VW= $XYῌl- UMZ[ ,**1- ><(( =A\ , kRST01U( ¨©NJO

5 $Z%&%(]^ *./ cm A / cm, *+,PQ@2( (Mrª }«(]^ /./ cm A +/./ cm-   _ qave  U

<AfG <c 5¬M¨©H<A^?234 q `=abcd(Gf?{­(G $Rassam et al., ,**.- c

RST01¨©  2345 Àimůnek ete !? "fG $S

al., +332- _ gh(ijkl  B.m#

$

h $* t- fn%

hA

( U

234GcARST01& 

 $'i .. + h ῑ+- _ 67< Ks ¨©

oB.f5 pqro E $t- kst

^rMs uvwSxv'QMrM<AfGd)+ *+, Ks8,** cm d)+- £¤O l ¨ <()y c ". ©  Mualem $+310- U® $l8*./-   Ecum $ti- /01 zH {*Mys῍¢BC D5]^ADrH ῌa<¢(A $%&% Ks8//* cm

o|kl  ( wp  + A¨©2345AF}~+῎ =F¯°±² , 5". ῌV(/01AIc  wq$h-, wq , wE ]^54EH  pqo E $t- H M  

>?@? +* A _ v ,/01f-³/B.Arl LM./01 IJ(Àimůnek et al., ,**/-  
S· HYDRUS-+D $S

G AH %&%]^ *./ cm   *Mh)1** cm (  , 2345 *q*.-/ (ck>/01 n  (7^?
v8

+
ns,

.

/-^fLM v /01 /-^0 s,῏ 12 -  #_? vE  ".
AH ῌ.+ 

6ῑ, $aῐῌ ?67³/G´µ¶Z%&% 6ῑ, $b-2345¸*+,, Fayer / $

4- Durner / $4- VG / $¹º4- 
5O34C 5 ,/5O34

/01º : L » =O56¼­ ,  

69

K5 J =s *./ cm  |}=I6

 ! "# ,=XI- .* $%& ' ()*#*+!, 

1** cm {=W&

'& -. Durner /012345674kzY

89:;<= qr>*, a,?+*@-, w,>* ABCD Iy= Js56L

2EFG 3H2 34=IG+!,8

|}tT6!wgVk& hq@e  / cm N

T' hq@0* cm {&

k&



9:;<2J῍+ =K5 LML= Fayer /01234.,+ 

&74 N q  h OP=O&GQR W|2pW2

=S56#*T6. UNIV

G~2 -,,/012&34&

W Durner /01 N=XG

YY()*2K5Z[\]^_U=`a& ῍- = Fayer /01 Durner /01 VG /012-,,G~&g|}tN H= Fayer /01234&74 bN ¡¢£2K5 W ῍. =+!,

ch῍@,** cmd IVef56 N¤¥¦2K& -,,89:;<§ ch?@,** cmd QR=S56.

lJ῍, =K&()*2Jag  Durner /012

Fayer /0174 N H ¡ Js74 UN=XG()*

¨wgVk56Z[2IV`a& c

="h=IV34& e LML= VG /012

῍-d W §l\2IV`a&34&74 bNijk2IV

 c῍. cadd ¤¥¦ h OP=O&GQ

Ja56 elT6m nop

qr cq*.*-d

R=©ªS56 VG /01=O& Fayer /01=rs56#*. @2*῍h῍@+*,*** cm  h?@2* cm «,' SzY =6#*

2tuv& hῌ@+*,*** cm twuv& W

2K5 c῍. cbdd Mualem /01 ¬{ Se

=O&G ()*2K52 xH

­&G¤¥¦® ,6 cῌ dm56IyzY ' 34{  nopJ῍+ 89:;<2 |}~=XF6

+*0 cm  qq* 6 Fayer /01 

&G¬{ Se wg . ¤¥¦k¯4V VG /01=°Gwg., 

῍- =

qr =rs56 VG /01=O&G hm q@

LML|}tN

H2' ¤¥¦2tuv56 VG /01±²ῌ-|}t=XF6 LML ³N H : ´µ¶·  ² e²¸-,, Fayer /01 Durner /01 VG /01=I6 ¡¹Fig. -

Pressure heads change during the evaporation process for Tottori dune sand :plots are the observed data, and solid, dashed, and chain lines indicate predicted pressure head changes using the Fayer, Durner, and VG model, respectively.

'§> ¨ +*1 © G,**1H

70

ῌῌ.

lm"[\E  GaH NO P GbH .'9:;z : vwx vP P Py Fayer IJK Durner
IJK van Genuchten IJKA[\x

Fig. .

(a) Water retention curve and (b) unsaturated hydraulic conductivity as afunction of the pressure head for Tottori dune sand estimated with the evaporation method : open circles are the observed retention data, and solid,
dashed, and chain lines are those predicted with the Fayer, Durner, and VG
model, respectively.

῍ῌ, lmA  ¡'¢£f>[\Rd
Table ,

Soil water hydraulic parameters for Tottori dune sand and Kumamoto Andisol obtained inversely with the evaporation method.

Tottori dune sand

qr

qa

qs

a Gcm¤+Hnw,a, Gcm¤+Hn,

Ks Gcm d¤+Hl

VG modelFayer model
Durner model
Fayer (with vapor)
Fayer (with K data)*4*,3*¥*4--*¥*4*23 *4-+1
*
¥
*4--¥
*4*23 *4-+3¥*4*23 *4-+-

*4*-.
*4*-/
*4*-/
*4*-/
*4*-/

.41,
14..
04.,
14-.
140*

¥
¥
¥
¥
¥
¥
*4+1 041-¦+*¤. +4.,
¥
¥
¥
¥
¥
¥

1.422
32422
0/4,.
+**4.012+43.

,4/3¦+*¤,42-¦+*¤.
-4-*¦+*¤*4+/+4+2

Andisol
VG modelDurner model*4***.
*4*+*2

¥
¥

*4*20
*4*-*

+4+.
,4,3

¥
¥
¥
*40- +4++¦+*¤. +4.,

2.-40
.34/

¤*4*3,*421



 

*4020
*4012



f>Cgh*iE 7#$Rj l C[\k   !"#$% & !". lmno:;`aCAWpik& !'()*+,[\"qB.CDE-%./01%2

34.567 8 '9:r  Durner IJKCgXE sjt '9:;;<=>:;?@A 34B.CDE.

u#`a Geῌ-H NO Pvwx Geῌ. GaHH

F6 GTuller and Or, ,**+H Fayer IJK" L:

CAWpiE

Durner IJK

;?@MENO PῌQRIJ

yz{_7 , |}|CDk Fayer IJK.

K.ESTN#$%UVW Mualem IJKC~E& !"&_4CDEXYZ [\"%2]Geῌ. GbHH Durner IJK ,  VG IJKCRC5^E4 E_E B:;`abcRdjE}|NO PC*ikIJK"  Geῌ-H Fayer IJKAZ& !NOW 8 Fayer IJKC

123)¹./ : [º!»0!M5i),|# ¼1

῏.

71

   !"#$%&'
()*

)

+,-./,0

Fayer 1234

VG 123 -56 78)9:

 !"#;.%<  0 .=VG 1238%>?@A8B.C&'F

DE *./ cm

GHI4 0* JKLM=%>NO1* cm P

-RST UVI8WX
Y

῏-Z 4Q.C

VG 123[\[ -56

5]#8^X.%_` 0.,, 

[\[ abP 4 cd efgB5ahijk  l 5ahi8 mno%.

5]# /῏/ M ῌ
῍ pMm5ahi8

> Fayer 123ῌ/5ahi =¯o56M=°5]# UVI ±²[\[
5]# M& : ³´µ4U
VI <s qrUs ¶Us4w·
5ahi UVI8.%&' 5ahi8&' UVI8&' Fayer 123 I¸

Fig. /

Impacts of accounting for vapor ﬂow
and the observed unsaturated hydraulicconductivity data for higher water content on the estimation of hydraulic conductivity of Tottori dune sand : open
circles are the observed hydraulic conductivity data, and dashed, gray, andblack solid lines describe predicted hydraulic conductivity using the Fayer
model without neither vapor ﬂow nor
the observed data, with vapor ﬂow, andwith the observed data, respectively.

5]# Yqr

UsZ 8 5ahi8.%&'  Y<sZ
S>t

u 4v.C>%l N h῍O,* cm
x+** cm dO+.%o56 4=w K

I w>O,*yhyO1* cm M=%> *.*+ cm dO+ Q-R !"

4῏, Mt 5z{s8qa, qs, a, n

I4



!"

5ahi M|}T

~I.C Q 5ah8F A
GHIN
 

῏-

5  GH

K']# lI4 5ahi8.%&'4 lx,.2-+*O.
h8&'4
I0

 % lx*.+/%Mm hῌO0* cm

8&' M> 5a0C 


5]#4

l

5ahi
E.I

.C w %4E aMm!"8:5ahi 4E%

5i), 5ah M|}T

῏0 M 0- JKL cd 5 8t 5

<4¤*D%  4 5i), 

ahi8GHM=%>4 cDE

M>4 5ahi mN c5¥¦*., cm dMefE>% !u58^& v+,8t>%4 55ah

 Q [\[ abP 4 !u5i

>E 5"#M-%ef 4 5

M5ahi 4§ !,M,¨ %

ahi$M~  5ahi8

w l § $ !,M=%>N aM

.%GHM=%>4 d  5"; .C>% 4
*Z 5i

῎ p  4 YKuhxῌca

8%lM . .F $8cdM&l῎ p ¥¦8%>
5]# M> ῌa 8&© 5ahi8M
ª4E%
.,- 

0 Y' ,**0Z   Md 5F[\[ aU«M=%> DE / cm

 4 5ahi8¡ Mm¢.

UVI4 U«¬­L - JK

 ef R( YDE *./ cm £RZ

F A

 5

!u5F

hxO,, cm Q®­QaU« 4-Rd-º78} » +*1 ¼ F,**1K72

0 551 "~z!!p} 6

RD.51C-+. 0 5E  r. !"L "4, 

"  p#$S 1Y.51%+. 0 u NO"/ &+

῍ [3"_`no NO ῌ+\51"YZ+B p#

,Dg 51r 1fSAE 0.ῌ- ῏ΐῐ῎῍ῒi῎1 "

67N

OC 0 D /./ cm, +/./ cm 7N
O
ῑῌ0

Fig. 0 "Y'"Y @A(+1* u)"@"*-0 +1*   "p.D /./ cm NOQ.** cm ·!p"L 5bcO : 6l l E¸Edef-/.no1f-nobcO¹

u"*- {+D +/./ cm NO

Calculated water content proﬁles near
the soil surface with (solid line) andwithout (dashed line) considering vapor
ﬂow.

i ῎1 " deu/. Durner UVW1VG UVW"YZ+ 7-7bcj

kC 0 u i῎2 ",<l1
,jk ῎, "%&'(),OC 0 /L
Fayer UVW   !"#  Ks



$%&'()" *+,-.%&'()"/ 0 Ks $%&'()1234,-.51   67"8, 9:;< .%&'()

=>?@ABCDE+.

Q+/* cm u@"*-0.]>?

 bc1/

 %&'(),-1/Z0 5E  *,<l.l

Fayer UVW, C ,<l "

r/.51 ¡ 1fSAE 0
Durner UVWno 7bcO

NO1

Y4{|- Fi῎1K u ,<lNFSÀimůnek et al., +332 ; GOY4¢- Fi῎2 FaKK0 Durner UVW

HῌIJ ,**1K0 >?"L.+,-I M   ,<l"8;-+C- h

Ks B NO FKsP//* cm dQ+K " *+RD/O

PQ,** cm !p£E< ¤C-0 5E  ¥F 1 S T Fayer U V W  ,  O Ks P 32.22 cm/¦1¥/0¦}§¨}©/ 5

dQ+K0 5 X

FA +33/K "YZ+N-NO FhPQ,1.1 cm "L+/,.+0 cm dQ+ hPQ-/./ cm "L

11ª-+. 0/«¬ h­Q+** cm 

KP

/*  ¥/®¦"

KP2.,- cm dQ+K

L ¯°"2±}7C-+L h

῍ [K "\- ]>?"Y Fayer UV3 Fῌ

῍Q+** cm *@W%&'(),^/Z0 /*  ¥/0¦¤²³3"/Z51

NO"@

de

C-+. 1>´r 0 ,fgh"^/Z0 i῎/ " 

<l"Y4 o- ¥/0µ}1ª-NOS+]>?-,jk FlK NO11

/r

B"C- %&'(),jk῎, "C 0 ebcNV()mSno ,3 1¶S 0

jk

_`a

wP+* 1- bc

KsP2.-.0 cm dQ+ 1/ NO"pq.0

Durner UVW   -e4}{+ VG UVW .+ 7^/Zno 

51r NOmS+B  67NO ¢7bcO"s. tAEh u hvQ/./ cm  +1* /* ¢r/. Fi῎.* cm  

1K0 ,<l NO/A@"-¤wx yz{|-+.

B D

./0%¸¹ : Tº5Bn5 "#$%&' »¼

 

73.. 

 ῌ2  ! "#$%&'

Mualem ./01 FGH BFGIJKLMN

()*+,- VG ./0123456789

OPQ 5 &R<./0=S

(:;<=>?@ABCDE TUTV,Q1 W "X5YRZ[A\1 ] "X^_`B1 
a*b?

-cd1 Mualem ./01 e"fghijklQ1R<=>?,BCDE m n5V,Q  nIo=cd
1hij*b?pq&*S @ rst
V,Q , uH avw "Hxyzῌ

{./0=S Fayer ./0B Durner./01 TUT|2345}~R<B*=>

5(:R

<Q,BCDEl Mualem ./0V^_{)l 1

yRBQ*ῌ1Fig. 1}~V«r234556 7
89 : ¬­¡®1¯° ¯z l±²z1
 Durner ./0 VG ./0 ¨³(9´µ¶
Pressure heads change during the evaporation process for Kumamoto Andisol : plots are the observed data, andsolid and chain lines indicate predictedpressure head changes using the Durner and VG models, respectively.

Mualem ./ uBQ l*./ Q,?, Mualem, +310
1  ?&
- l "HxyzB1 Q

B56 7'  D ¡¢ £¤BQ&*¥, ¦,7fg "HxyzQ()&], Fayer ./0| Durner./0V,Q E^_{)l §P

BQ ,B ¨ Mualem ./0  "Hxyzῌ

{./0©&ª!

ῌ2}~·=§P2345 a
"Hxyz b B56 7
' : ¬­¡®1¯° ¯z l±²z1  Durner ./0 VG ./0§P¶Fig. 2(a) Water retention curve and (b) unsaturated hydraulic conductivity as afunction of the pressure head for Kumamoto Andisol estimated with theevaporation method : open circles are the observed retention data, and solidand chain lines indicate those predicted with the Durner and VG model,
respectively.

» WX! Y +*1 ¼ %,**1.

74 

  D*+*+10 Fayer 67821G! " #$ 

$

9:;

J

G>N  H I2K1 {   %&'()*+* $ h,-1**

3$ h-2* cm

cm. /0 %S
Àimůnek et al., +332. 11 2Y1 hm-+*0 cm>? q*  Fayer 678 $ #

N<



2$ 



#!



#!3 45 Mualem: Se F 29D  qr 9 

678 9:;ῌ<678

2HG> VG 678 HIJ}m/ #!=> /?&'@!3 "(0 "<A #!

2BCD$1 11 EF(0$ *+*

9:;G> Fayer 67: $ z # ' K()L.

$ Fayer 6782N¢> nopqrO
|&"M># 

Fayer 678</ uN9:;G> Durner 678$ &'*QR+S># ,  ¡

M2)P10 Durner 678

8$  H I J 2K1 L!
10 $% &'O(2)P1

QR.

£¤!#DN *+*+10$*+*0$ ¥2P1¦§¨q^©2nopqr "N ¥NT

P

"<A

ª$/

10 DU1<A$  9 D$ ¥«o¬­2Q®1 ¯«:;2 VW 6782Do¬­ ° ±²«o¬­21G N 

X,!2Y10Z

Jx  R:2m1SD X,!2Y10

EF(0 -[* \]^_`.a ³´/*+*  H$ T 

b c2 9:;ῌ<6!Eµ0¥

78$ Jd/ N $Z1 ef 2&' <Agh)i Mualem 678()QR<

N ±²¸¹10  R:2m1Si G l $ .

¥0j1

kl/22m>no¶·$F { | T "+10

2P>A$/

pqr10s3h)Dt4 uvU D U+10 Durner 67821G  Mualem 678

9:; J G>N  HJd/5!w0 # (). 0j1+>67!89)

I2K1 Durner 678   Jx WN# (03$@2Y1 h-,** cm : :N  9:;2my i #: z2Y1 D$ &'QQR&'*QR "t4 u {¡ ,  M2)P10 

| VG 678 #  2}m1 Fayer 678
 Durner 678$ Jd ;~<678 u

1/ῌ ῍ ῐ ῏ ῎
EF $ VG 678 =>? qr 2}m1
 Fayer 678 , ,@

9:;G1 WJU
2  Durner 678$  

VG 6782<G>D

@  9:;21 Durner 678



!3

uDY/  9:;+10G! z

Fayer 678 Durner 678(0 /QR<

G l 2"nopqr10DW
Mualem 6789:;ῌ

<678 /5!2ºUD 

2 Malem 678A10B3

0 * (&' !2C1 { | D*+*+> //0 11 * +>

Jx  Fayer 678 Durner 678

nopqr "2  9:; H
I0 J 678   E2

!" #$ 

Fayer 678+> Durner 678 U # J 2my 0i V$ 12
0N#:z { | VG 6µ\

: ºb# »#¼%cdµ$¸¹



75

Durnerb%  W

    X,  M. Th. van Genuchten  

Fayer

 

#]%WX, #] ,-./ +*0 : +*/ῌ++,.

!"#$%&'()*+Marquardt, D.W. (+30-) : An algorithm for least-

01232345637 89:;squares estimation of nonlinear parameters.

<=>?@AB C/%

SIAM J. Appl. Math., ++ : .-+ῌ..+.
Millington, R. J. and Quirk, J.M. (+30+) : Permeabilityῌ ῏ ῎ ῍of porous solids. Trans. Faraday Soc., /1 : +,**ῌ

Brooks, R.H. and Corey, A.T. (+30.) : Properties ofporous media a#ecting ﬂuid ﬂow. J. Irrig. Drainage Div., ASCE Proc. 1, (IR,) : 0+ῌ22.

+,*1.
Mualem, Y. (+310) : A new model for predicting thehydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous

Burdine, N.T. (+3/-) : Relative permeability calculations from pore-size distribution data. Trans.
Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng., +32 : 1+ῌ11.
Campbell, G.S. and Shiozawa, S. (+33,) : Prediction ofmedia. Water Resour. Res., +, : /+-ῌ/,,.

HIJῌῌ
]

ῌ

ῌpq

r 8+33/; : #Y pp. ++/ῌ+-0 }~23i[}~Y

hydraulic properties of soils using particle size

Philip, J.R. and de Vries, D.A. (+3/1) : Moisture move-

distribution and bulk density data, in Interna-

ment in porous media under temperature gradi-tional workshop on indirect methods for estimating the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils,
University of California Press, Berkeley, +33,.

ents. Eos Trans. AGU, -2 (,) : ,,,ῌ,-,.
Priesack, E. and Durner, W. (,**0) : Closed-form expression for the multi-modal unsaturated con-Childs, E.C. and Collis-George, N. (+3/*) : The permea-

ductivity function. Vadose zone J., / : 23,ῌ232.

bility of porous materials. Proc. Roy. Soc.

Rassam, D., Àimůnek,S
J. and van Genuchten, M.Th.
8,**.; : HYDRUS-,D 

London, Ser. A, ,*+ : -3,ῌ.*/.
Durner, W. (+33.) : Hydraulic conductivity estima-

[ HYDRUS £(¤ }~Ytion for soils with heterogeneous pore structure.

Rossi, C. and Nimmo, J.R. (+33.) : Modeling of soil

Water Resour. Res., -* : ,++ῌ,,-.
Eching, S.O. and Hopmans, J.W. (+33-) : Optimizationof hydraulic functions from transient outﬂow
and soil water pressure data. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
Fayer, M.H. and Simmons, C.S. (+33/) : Modiﬁed soil
water retention functions for all matric suctions.

Water Resour. Res., -* : 1*+ῌ1*2.
S¥D¦ῌ§E ¨ῌJiri Àimůnekῌ
hij 8,**0; :] +*. : 0-ῌ1-.

§E ¨ῌhij 8,**0; :   : J.R. Philipand D.A. de Vries  ®¯°±²©ªb

Water Resour. Res., -+ : +,--ῌ+,-2.

DEFGῌHIJ 8+32.; : KLMNOMPQR\ ++, :HcdWX, #]

3^#H

ῌ_ῌ`aῌR3 bcdef g^ 8h

 +*- : +*/ῌ

++,.

§E

.-ῌ/-.
Jury, W.A. and Horton, R. 8,**0; : #]water retention from saturation to oven dryness.

#Hcd ©ª«¬­ #/1 : ++01ῌ++1/.

3STLUVWX,Y 6Z# 3[

#H¡¢ 8hijῌElm k; 6Z# 3[#]¨ῌhij 8,**1; : ³´©ª

cdµ¶·¬­¸¹ #]

+*0 : --ῌ.0.

ij k : Elmῌn oῌpq rῌsÀimůnek,SJ., van Genuchten, M.Th. and Àejna,SM.

tuῌvwx; pp. 23ῌ3- +*1ῌ+*2 yz{(,**/) : The HYDRUS-+D software package for| }~Ysimulating the movement of water, heat, andKosugi, K. (+330) : Lognormal distribution model for

multiple solutes in variably saturated media.

unsaturated soil hydraulic properties. Water

Version -.*. HYDRUS Software Series +, Dep. of

Resour. Res., -, : ,031ῌ,1*-.

Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California Riv- 8,**1; :   : Y. Mualem  

erside, Riverside, CA.

   +*1  ,**1

76

I-b wFmC mDwmBwm ln wmDwln wEÀimůnek,SJ., Wendroth, O. and van Genuchten, M.Th.
(+332) : Parameter estimation analysis of theevaporation method for determining soil hy-

A1

6X" A0 *+ G w 89*@NOPA5

draulic properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 0, : 23.῏

G wFGs W*BH +DW*DH +Dw

3*/.

ῌῌ

wSW*,**/ : 

G wFGs w

 !" #$ῌ#%&'()" +2 . : .*+῏.+*.

A2

w῕W*

==@" W*F*.3 @GQ" H w" Gs w 8YPZP"

Tuller, M. and Or, D. (,**+) : Hydraulic conductivity
H wFln wDmwBm mD+of variably saturted porous media. Water Resour.
Res., -1 : +,/1῏+,10.

A3

wk
῎῏ῌ mB+Bk

A+*

῍ῌῌ

tion for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of

Gs wFwmB+ ῐ

unsaturated soils. Soil Soc. Am. J., .. : 23,῏232.

ῌw+2

Dm mD+ mD,van Genuchten, M.Th. (+32*) : A closed-form equa-w,.

@GA5 6X" Mualem HIJ ῌ * [LM῍

89*@NOPA5ῌ῍ +GmaxFGs h*BG*c

῎ *+ Gs h" ,-. Gmax /01234

A++

Fayer and Simmons, +33/5 67" ῍ *89*:;==@" h* 8 A, *\]4A=>?@;A^_

<4=>?@;A5+#TU3`" ,-Y *.*,/ῌa @N4=>?@;A5
6X G*c h 8"

Se XBgSaBC+D XBgSaEC+B DahnEDm῍῎

G*cFa +DgSaDSaB

A+==@" Sa Fqa ῌ qs, XF+Dln Dah ῌ ln Dhm" gFln

C Dah* nD+D Dahc nD+Eaῌln Dhm @GA5 Mualem HIJ ῌ * KLB

M89*@NOPA5

aSa ῑ
I- wΐ
I, h"wBn ῔
ln Dhmῒ

῍
῎

n D+

==@" wFC+B Dah E

A,

ῌ῍ ,
A-

+ ῍+
+῏
D
a ῎h
hmῐ

B +Dwm@GA5 hc 8 A, *?aWb + 34^c+#@GQ" I+ w" I, h, w"I+ wF +DwmmD +Dwm

D +Dw

mD+

+ ῏
ΐ
῔
nD+ῐ

TU3`" de@8D+*D1 cm f X5

I- w /081234RQ@GA5

I, h"wF

A+,

aSa ῑ
+ ῏
῍
Dah* nD+ ln Dah*D῎nD+ῐln Dhm ῒ

D Dahc nD+ ln DahcD

Gs hFI+ wa +DgSaDSa
BSa῏
nln Dhmῐ

TUgh-A#ijklma Kvh /0123
45
KvhF

mD+

A.

I- wFI-a wBI-b w*

wSw*

A/

I- wFI-b w

w῕w*

D
Mg
rvs
Hr
rw
RTads

B+

==@" D 8+#ijnma L, TD+" rw 8op
MLD-F+D1.-1s+*D0s TD.,B-.13s+*D2s#qr

TD. kg mD-" T 8tVur K, de@8 ,*v @-MLD-FTD+s+*D-sexp==@" wm 8+#TU hm V4A w W@GQ" w*

w/" rvs 8xy#ijqr

8 +*D+* @GA5 A/ *+ I-a w" I-b w 89*@-+.-1D0*+..13T D+D1.3,s+*D-T kg mD-" M 8#

NOPA5

Kz

MmolD+" F*.*+2*+/ kg molD+" g 8{U|}ῑ ῍+Dw*῏D + ΐD +Dwmῒ ῎ w* ῐ m῔r LT " F3.2+ m sD," R 8j~/a ML, TD, molD+ῑln῍+Dw῏D + ΐBG +DwDG +Dw E A0*ῒ ῎ w ῐ m῔tVr@GA5 +#ijnma D 89*@

I-a wF +Dw*m ln

D,KD+" F2.-.+ J molD+ KD+" Tabs 8Vur K" Hr 8

PA5

%&'0 : 789a=>93!k-./012HI

B,

DtaqairDa qair ta

L- L - Da    L, T +,.+,+* / Tabsῌ,1-.+/, m, s +  ta     Millington
and Quirk, +30+

῍

qair1ῌqs,

77

B-

!"#$  Philip and de Vries, +3/1

ῌ hMg ῎῍RTabs῏

HrexpB.

ῌvan Genuchten VG %&'()*+,-./012 Fayer %&' Durner %&'34

56 789:;<=>9?@A1( 03BCDE3FG+6HI+, JK7L7 MN
OPQ93!+6 RS3;%&'TUVWXYZ([\], Fayer %&'7L7^_`abcde Durner %&'OPQ9=>^a=>fg\`hi(bjk  3;l -m3;]6g\ , 4Ehi(no+ VG %&'3pq6;ljrs\BCDE(+, Mualem %&' -`tu3!+6@v1w5%&'(A5 x3^_yv l (YZka3;l z-{|}~,5BCDE(@ 3bj,w5BCDE(YZk,3 53@vk-`tu2(A5a
 : ,**1  2  ,,  : ,**1  +*  +0 




J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
3¼PtNo. +*1, p. 13 30 ,**1ῌ

 !"#$
S ‡nek**ῌ****ῌJiri ‘imu
Prediction of Long-term Changes in Soil Water Content and Temperaturein Bare Soils : Determining Surface Boundary Conditions
from Estimated Meteorological Information
Hirotaka SAITO*, Jiri ‘
SIMU÷NEK** and Nobuo TORIDE***

IJz8Wvrw$ 8W{/|}~8W{/K+    

Lz)M.N0&- OiPQ)$7> NO$%K+\'rp8Wvrw-M.N0  

& $1 * *+8Wvrw-$%  !"#$ %& &PQ &QzvrwR*+-S'() + *+ !"#,-$%&./0&1 2'% $ ()34

TU2

 

/8+ -.8I >@ M&2 $"&1 ="PQ NO$%8W

567 *89+ :-;

vrw8Wvrw)V+zI %

$ ,<!=-" (8<!>?@A 34

BC& DSaito et al., ,**0E1 =# '%

1 e 34 94*0&$* !.

* !./$ F0 GH

/$ W@Yrw8M&$%-0&-(8IJ,<!1KL2M&$%-0&1
34F0 ῌ (8ῌ,1K<!NO!"PQ
5RS6TIJU*6T78M&$%-0&1
996TVF0 6:W M&PQ RS6T$

 ῌ 9!./

I 34 ῌ9

DSaito et al., ,**0E!./#$ zN/M&)
8$XFY1
Z[$ RS-\0&PQ` 

XYZ[\ ]; 0&$];^<7)=H

Nz$%'() + 4*+0&& D ,**0E1 ) F0 GH (8 ,$*+34 IJ9 !./M&<!L2M&PQ =_`RS6

F0 ῌ (8ῌ,1K<!NO$%RS6T

T78M&$%-0&1 * >8 3RS0#&]`s^M&1 * nopqrklm

&RS$ RS$3 9a

I RS6T78M& K+_`+ {/? K+ b :M&ca?dRS6T & D

Cvrw%Aa_8Wvrw

 ,**0E1 e f5&F0 ῌ (8ῌ,&2 - 34 IJ9 :./=H&-@ga?A!&# F0 ῌ (8ῌ,AB`M1 +  ῌ,<!./!"h i BCRS6TD@2

PQ bH + K+VcK++ /88W

F RS6T$$j1 E

klm nopqrklm

s@2 D@2 -j&1
nopqrklm$ 3t@>80vrw &

vrwdPM;e))&f;>>j@ eNO:M&g>>j1 =# hi&j[V+m

Aa

G>a?M&# "uRS6T78#

vrwM&z NO>jABk$ 8Wvrw>&./ &1 xH>89ῌyῌ &$%+M&$%-0&1 2"l* m ¡>¢bS£¢¤¥¦§¨ ©+2-ῌ2/*3 n4ª«o -ῌ/ῌ2** ¬­X®p¯°>¢­±r²³´µ¶R£¢p*** ·¸>¢>¢¨S¢¦§£ ©/+.ῌ2/*1 ·¸¹qªºro»o +/11 : nopqrkl 9^< ];^< sNOu 23O v +*1 ¼ u,**1v

80      

qv¦qvh§qvT¦¨Kvh     !"# $

 %

(h
(T
¨KvT
(z
(z

῍

 h ¤YZ uwx¤Yv ©mª z [U ©mª &'ῌ(ῌ )*+", !

T ' ©Kª qLh L qLT _£¤YWaS'-.!/01 2345*67/

8234

WS$ s¡¢ ©m s¨+ª KLh ©m s¨+ª L

5*9:  ῌ'-;#$

KLT ©m, K¨+ s¨+ª _£¤YWaS'W<!=>? !@"A"#!)*+6B9:,«\HGHI]¬^$ # qvh L qvT _ ; $ C#1 D %"#!&D E£¤YWaS'WS?&'(1 )! "  F*+1  , G-©m s¨+ª Kvh ©m s¨+ª L KvT ©m, K¨+ s¨+ª _£¤

HIJ.KHLM' NA$s¡¢YWaS'W«\H?&­d¬^

2345*67// 802345*&O)*

$ ,8 s¡¢GHI  _\1

+!D",9:#:  <!P)4/Q`aHL yL + z{&$ῌ?&oJ

R1 ;231S.TU ;$ 1"1

®bc%/d,$4V!&W5X ;  )*+

(q
(ῑ
(h
¦
KLh
(t
(z ῒ
(z

Y6ZHP)4/M7[ '\]#P)4/^&H 81;$ _ 9`!

§KLh§KLT

P)4/; 2345*67/ 89:#$!a:;<=>Z ?@bc![?d

(T
(h
(Tΐ
§Kvh
§KvT
¨S
(z
(z
(z ῔

 q e f¯g ©m- m¨-ª  hg qL L

AH) ?@dac?@L?d B?&hg qv)$ ?@dAHP)4L6eCA;

D ±;²YE ©s¨+ª $ fg P)44BhDi&$?j :;< >k hl;mE1#n

῎

IL!$ # S =2°S±!

,, oJLU f -1!;a; yL! F G H I   o J K  p q r s t HYDRUS- + D+ z{0oJ ®bc%/ 02345* _\1SuS
‘imu
‡nek et al., ,**/v ;# uSaito et al., ,**0v$

T"$ GHI 02345* _\1 0!a wx G- yL + z{ῌ0oJ(O2345* iajL±;²Yj 67®³}z/

L1 yLD|}!LH$ #?jeC ~k,$Z  M4NOP2W

(Sh
(qh
¦¨
¨Q
(t
(z

:QRU#  u*v / aS'

῏ SJ1  ,#&O)*+",>

 Sh  0j u02345*v ©J m¨-ª qh 

k5XT} $ῌ?&ῌ0UoJ?j6

0 s¡¢ ©J m¨, s¨+ª Q 0l´ A0 ±;1#CH$²YE ©J m¨- s¨+ª $  0j Sh  Nmz/k,$, ῌῌ
,+ 

Sh¦CnTqn§CwTqL§CvTqv§L*qv



¦uCnqn§CwqL§CvqvvT§L*qv¦CpT§L*qv

V'5X$  ?&#Wῐ¨-S oJH?& oJMAH)$  T  ' ©Kª qn µhg ©m m ª Cn,

V'5X  oJ Philip and de Vries

Cw, Cv, Cp _£µh h ?&h

-

¨-

¨+

u+3/1v S&/-U#$ !a ?&oJ3- ©J m

K ª Cp XA;  ῌh u,**0v 1;$ 

h

f0nj

$

s¡¢aS?&s¡¢ _

¨+

f0nj

fgS Yoc,#8
I

f0nj ©J m¨-¨-K ª L*  ?@p0 ©J m ª $ !a £'WL¤YW¥JYLH , B

f0nja;  &h f0njq ¶2·L}$  L} yL + z{ $ s¡¢ qL Lr¸ M¹U; sºHL}$ #?& s¡¢ qv  z/;HL}$82·

῍(h §+῏¨K (T῎(z ῐ LT (zqL¦qLh§qLT¦¨KLhῌ

f0nj 82· #Lr0 u»·jt# 0njv

fk,$ Jury and Hortonu,**0 ;ῑ/. /v <! ¶2· r0L:;$  ?@p0 L*   # rw L»·jtlmn£·Z¸ : AB Wt¹º»¼ L 
! "#  $ %

//

pq

rstw AB WCDE= ,ῌ =- "W9|}ef&&<CDE=FGH)F;&!  ~pq %)\)

[8XZ

(qLT
(qvT
(qv
+Cw
+Cv
+L*
+CwST
(z
(z
(z



  o W7@ CDE=Zb Wῐz <&7@ CDE=ZtW

:RQ<ST Sz ,4s++5  UV'&< <&<AB W"# ῌ = ῐ =8XYZ<- ZF@ o {,S‘imu‡nek et al., ,**/-,ῌ- ῏ῐῑ῎῍[ %)\)]8^_:X` /9Fa!  ~pq 'uv

ῐῌ+ rstuvw ! g h ]8 KLT "# xy]8 Kvh 9 KvT lmn=
W]8



¡¢




KLh hGwT+ dg 
g*4 g s+,5g* dTD4m, s++5+-

rsv4kg m 5++

M4kg mol 5+,

g4m s 5++

R4J mol
Kvh

++

K 5

Hr4+5

14*

AB '¨,/§

g4g s+,5

D
Mg
rsv
Hr
RT
rw

X

W£¤¥¦tef¤'@]8,Nimmo and Miller, +320-

GwT4+5KLT

1+423

AB '¨,*1./0+*.+.,/T+,.-2+.T,-©

AB xy]8 ,*t qaDa-©

 

©

lnª

*4*+2*+/

« ¬­

342+

®¯8

24-+.

|0°

©
©

1ῌa

 q 
 qs,

t4+5

±¥ *

Da 4m, s++5

*,.+,+*+/ T ,1-.+/

qa 4m- m+-5

|

h4+5

*3./.- q +2./ exp ++. ῍ῌ῎  q   ῑ ῐ qs
qs²B xy]8

©

,

©

³´]8
KvT

drsv
D
hHr
dT
rw



W<&&Z[/9 :< %z

(qv
(CpT
(
(T
.L*
*
l,q(t
(t
(z 
(z 

Q

van Genuchten-Mualem lmn

#CDE= ,ῐ =- 2HH2:{789

῍ = ῎ ῏ =>?@ 9 ABIJKLM NOP

]8

o9z

l ,q- "#0 

:;&<

h

]8lmn='ῑ+  lmn='ῑ,

῏

 6

g

<rstuvwg h ]8"# xy

(T
.CwTqL.CvTqv.L*qv(z123 4J m++ s++ K++5

cdef@,van Genuchten, +32*-  < o

&  $ '()qh*+l,q-b i[jk)&< qh   

!

9:

81

©
.

῏

fc4+5

µA6 ,ª¶-*4*,

¼LM¢ ] +*1 p B,**1D82

ῐῌ, UVS/±"W /UVH3F²;IUVX³ W
²;IUVX

lBqD

´Y

l*BqD·bCw¸q¸l

l*

UVX
Bcb+·b,q·b-q*./D

b+, b,, b-

¬¹­

bfmg

º­

    

µHY¶
Chung and Horton,+321
Hopmans et al., ,**,




  !"#$
%&'( )

%&*!" +,-.- /01
2 

3 45 /6789:%&'(%&'(;2< =>?
%&'(@A BC2 ,**0D EF9: #$ GH3I
J2 K %&*#$

 #$  L!$#$M;212  N/O 3PQ2 F!"#$ ῌ 
῎ῌ++/x0Z[#eUVWXY\»%&'(*῍  "3 %&'(‘imu‡nek et3 R1 BS%& S !$T*

al., ,**/DUVWXYZ[\  ]UVWXY^_ =`aE

F;2UVWXY!$@#zt  3{t NUVWXY^_ |T}~ >s4
UVWXY567*6 + +F68. 9:0;q|T*E

RnbHbLEbGc*

῎* <0 :PQN*`UVWXY^_;2 G PQNN* Rn d#e fW mb,g H h fW

FQ  =< BRn, H, LED

mb,g L #$i fJ kgb+g E #$% fkg

TT >3F?1  3;3  

mb, sb+g LE 

|TT Y@'*`9:.AB9:b,;2#$ fW m g G *6 N&Oib, fW m g%& G %&'(312  Bvan Bavel and Hillel, +310 ;Noborio et al., +330 ; Fayer, ,*** jD EFNN*'2  #$% E #$k(%&'(* ῎ * Rn  G lm`n H  LE km`n

GC>

 <0|

O3F9: AD!$R.;2 T0 E'2  ]>'F
S 2 F$ Y;2 UVWXY^_r<PQE -ῌ ῏ ῑ ῍ ῒ* o /6)p**q *>'F3 GH*6 : EF rs!`t.m` + +(I BChihuahua DesertD

O *,-*u v῏+  w.+ SI/x J ¡W#e¢K£L¤M¥N

0,rsm`y BJury andP - m §¨Q +, ©ªT Fῌ

Horton, ,**0D + d#e /6

RA* NN* §¨Q*<t« At

1FUVWXYK( G Blm`D 3
2Q K -T G km`* + 2Q2

Ot F¦tF R¬A Y BScanlon et al., ,**/D

R
"3

!" ῌ #$ ῌ S|­?®¯T°y¸9zS»@¼ : ῒῌ-E F(HῌG05g6&7

83

b&SF LScanlon, et al., ,**,MD LmMF

T ·K
LcmῌdayM

qs

qr

aLcm+M

n

+
,
.
/
0

*4+41
*4*4*4*4+/

Sandy clay loam
Sandy clay loam
Sand loam
Muddy gravel
Gravel
Sand

.+
,*
0-3
+*
+/32.*
/21

*4./
*4-/
*4.*
*4+.
*4/+
*4-2

*4**
*4**
*4**
*4**
*4**
*4**

*4*,1
*4*+*
*4*,*
*4**1
+*43/
*4*/*

+4,10
+4+01
+4.0.
+4+22
+41,,
+411.

van Genuchten ¸9z¹º: Lvan Genuchten, +32*M

qs, qr, a, n



8a

+331   , m

 Lq0M G0 .9(H.  (aB &'; \ aBV  m'14#5' :*aB9:;;!  "#$%&'

<#U'; <ZZ;=& + <Z1 9:;

"  ()*

#5*&l  + 1 9:-Z6 : +, -.(/0'1#23'14#5' 6*\t';<;U' > +  2ῌ?a6 78 &9:;<# G @ <Z t =#+, *>3 ?# -.

c & +  aG g6\t' LKirkham@A BC3*& D -.*/ m 0

   E D F F  ῐ- "13 G(H   *.+/

*.- *.0 *.3 +., +./ ,.* m

I 1 # +331  +* J

aG Ta W3'  ( P

and Powers, +31,Mῑ ῍ttmax῏ΐῒ ῎ ,. ῐ῔

TaTTAtῌcos ,p# T+  AaG  At῍+  2aG+ K> LScanlon et al.,1?aG W"'B ¡K ¢C  tmax,**,M

2aG <£ h  >aG;¤¥ + < L+-

KIN

 O

+ PQ

0 *' -.*/ mI<M 21*'1'1 tmax+- 1*  +, <Z¥

N!RB16S& T9: U' 1 V¤¦ + <?1*' §ῐ, Bkl

BG1

aG6 T1 ῍ c¨©52ῌ?aG

W3 IN!R+*- X

+ <Z1

Y6 XZ [" #\# *., cm, ]^# , cm,

9:W3aG 6&ª 5g:*6&7

$# +/ cm 16 LScanlon et al., ,**,M _6S)l 2ῌ?aG9: «;D ¬ *lO

#U>4  ()\t6:*aG6&+ PQ`= ῌ -aῌ%b&c(  EV# +331  +* J +  LDOY,1.M  -0/ Z IN
S >  ' d e +332    6  4 +331 
LDOYM ) 6 # IN(& xyz{|}c~'%:*W3'1;#5'

DOY0-3 L+332  3 J

#\ .  % EF8a1 ]^-0/ Z16 fg*hC +(H­®:GH'1 "I¯J*aK L(G ,  9:ij-Z6W3 * k ./. <Z114856&'1;M-* M "#

l aBVm#  no ./ pq0 aG 1

&' LCampbell, +311M 1°; T± %

23r s3r; + <Z4&'; 

%*² EF IN  ./ῌ. :*91G 5g6& 7IN  9:\t:;;<#U'4¡³´ +  A./ 96aB9:u 6 <Z4 9: : «;D ¬ *l;U' _ ()*l aG

vw &

1NO +  A./ U m s+ xyz{|}c Lῌ cM ~'s3r
% % %
~#* 8a«:*.

/ 6\t';<;U  Pc#µ'./-ῌ+ ῐῑ῏῍῎ % =

% ". ='

8¶P Ur  &'QR;M&'
Ur

Umax
Umin

῏
῎

   +*1  <,**1=84 Umax  Umin m s+   + ῌ 

   !

"#$ %&'()*+,(-.((/ Umax 012  Umin   ! Ur ,Ur,U Umin
U
+;Ur
+;Ur

῎
῍

FAO <+333=  >? 1@ABC

012

" DEF <GH 1 I*GJ 1 I= 01
2KL <GJ 1 I*MN 1 I=
OP Gregory <+323= Uh43/QRS(TU"VW

4 XYZ["3/4>\ 6*]^ IL t"BC tmax  +  @_῏῍  `a(Ib h"79 cῐ- A defg hi8jk

 FAO <+333= 012 Gregory <+323= A1Pl

U "3/456789
Umax:ῑ ῍ttmax῏ΐῒ ῎ ,. ῐ῔

Uh:UU;<UmaxU
U=ῌcos ,p

ILTU BC"m9 

῎ ῍
῏ 6
! Ur " - 4BC ῍FA(n KLA (op"79`

qr stuv(TUw8`(/

xhyzA{/4 de|fgA + QR

S(TU9  ῌ 6f}aXYZ["~4]^
IL t A0-xhyz Hh  <Gregory etal., +33.=

ῌῌ,

+
<=

ῌ de*6"~4BCdeTU <j
!

= 8

ῌῌ-

+ 
%&' </j = A`6"~4BC
8 ILjk <=  !

ILjk

TU <j



=

º]»y¼ : 8efῌhgVῑ ῍ttmax῏ΐῒ ῎ ,. ῐ῔

HhH
HArῌcos ,p H  + ῐ῍  Ar  + 
 t max  + h &'( )*

!"#$%  + ,#

-.*!/!"#0 Gregory et al. 1+33.2 3456789:; 1Lubbock2 *<=

 >

῎ ῍
῏C
? / $ 0 $.*,#&@AB( ῍ +DE* +  

F G

#H&IJ'DE  Ar 

,

85

%& AB&AbB#!
 ,'!
'!

Rns

W m,

1h#! 2 ,!qQ

1h#! 2 &AbBh#!

Rnl

Wm, (AZPQ 1Jury and Horton, ,**0 #u2(RnRnsRnl1+a2St1esRldRlu2ῑ῍ a #! %& )&'  St *!

W m, es h#! %

&

) 1

&+AB

$*)!X2

 Rld %,`'!

K*LM",NKN*O0PQ( R῔.

1h#! 2 W m, Rlu % 1,`2 ,!qQ'!

STD*<= + $.,ῐ CO0WB
 ῍

UVN

X( ,K

Hr  , <OY - AZ[&\/B( ]^_DE Hr-  ``aT Ob  bcQ Hr DE
! UV,$.Hd&AZb

1h#! 2-D $.*<=*!

 efῌegXbhgSt  " ¡&+AZPQ 1Campbell, +3212(
Stmax1Gsc Tt sin e*2 Gsc %j(W m, &'(ῒ῍%¢*£¤*.

'#! / 10 +,-00 Wm,2  "1OrQZb(VBW# ,ῌ +ῌ,  G #Tt ,2¥  X0 ,¦§ / 1¨H& ]^_ij#&k/ZW&© /2 * AZ Uª*%*3" /«E

@AB( O0l#&bmF!n"op#ῒ Ce e " rad &A ¬CX( ῍qQZb 1Pr Ephrath et al., +3302( AA st

PQ 1Monteith and Unsworth, +33*2(

 Sg.* AZ uvS]^_ u$..w#bxy X0ΐ῍t* 4e$%&'( #< "­® "­5-ῌ, ῎ῐ῍~^C 1ῌ C2 !

῏ῌ.

,p1tt*2,.

 d "­® rad f ® rad t $.z{op|}X(&AB"!

sinesinfsindcosfcosdcos

Rn  )*,

1#! 2 $

q 1¯2 &X°A ±²6²³Q´Q,N ,-./µ KN,-./µ &(+ ]^_ 1¶bU·2 *LMIJC&k/ZWB
TD$.UVN 1¸2 [¹H 1U·7·2

º -² » +*1 ¼ ,**1

86

ῐ  a ῍ e Y01 +  Y7 eW+ ED     Y i(/&Ai+ "D t) a*..*.3/  !"#$%&'( Rnl T7%&'(+)  * ,**/+ ,- . $/(01

234($ 56,789

:;<= 8&>?

@A' B   !"#%&'(+ 

RnltVeseasT.aessTs.

XX7 wΐ῍! s E a E v''L

G(+  es  .C

01C> D2 *.*/

> i(+ ./(7 L

*.. EOP$RS4'LG($ G9'2

AD FC>734GHI$/(+C>JKELMN(OP*.3*.32 E +GQ8RS4'LG( Kondo et al., +33, ; van Bavel; Fuchs and Tanner, +300+ o07/

and Hillel, +310  $ 7 van Bavel and Hillel($ OP$GQ8RS4'LG(

(TJUG-+

+310

Noborio et al., +330b ; van Bavel and Hillel, +310 + 7 van Bavel and Hillel +310

q*W*.+

aV*.,/

aV*.-/q* *.+q*W*.,/ῑ῍

q**.,/

aV*.+*

G % Ortega-Farias et al., ,***G 

YZC> q* JKEL%-+esV*.3**.+2q*

῏
῎XX7 q*  YZC> [m- m-\ 7/(+῏ 7 ]^LG(7$ *.3 ,῎ῑ  (E ]^/(G_`a7῍"YZC>$ *../ 

b7/D cda7YZC>"# DefE $ *.32 ED ]^E"7 *.+ ghi(+ jkl=m$/(01 jk!G$(+$"LG(v8&)

v

l=mnoi(JKG(XE$,G$ pE' l=m$G01  "qrslG

7/(+(XE$7 (+

JKEL%&'(+   "7¡¢( v8

ῐ  u-r  "It) Rnl  ῍

8& v EwI

 v8& )

vc>?vE# 8&v ea v !_!&) $%$"$ +** m/(£x

8& 7/D 3* $"$ + km/(£x87%&'(+ /( ! T K  Y8&)& 7/( Monteith and Unsworth, +33*+    ῌ [W m,\  xyz{|}~-$¤L

|    e JKEL%&'(&$8'

ῌVesT.

ῒ῍

XX7 s xyz{|}~|bK /.01
Wm

.

K

or ..23

+*

3

,

MJ m

v§¨ '&'($ j©

pª$'&'(XE«7/(+ -N

% Jury and Horton, ,**0+,v !¥¦_!F4I + km 

.

K

+*2

+

d  7/(+ (¬ )­®*  v !E_!8&>?v¯ ea [kPa\ >?v+! rva [kg m-\ MN
῔.

v°bi(sl$KRS

4'LG( Brunt, +3-, ; Chung and Horton, +321 ;ῌ . v E±_!JK74'-?v¯ ea ¥¦>?v+! ra
,²UK

³´µ=m

+1.,1Ta,1-.+/

ea

rva

*.0++e+*-

Ta-/.2/

 



Hh

¶·!¸




hMg

Philip and de Vries,
+3/1

Hh[\

±_! Vexp

Ta[K\

v !

¹

T[K\

!

¹

RT

 

Hh¸¹º : ./»!Uῌ$¼n Kΐῌ/¶01. +* /* 3*ῑ 5c ,1/ K C

Brutsaerts, +31/    Brutsaert +31/  



87-,/ K ! Brutsaert "#!)*·/-

 D!!E ) 

A!"#! *:-ῌ- ῒ῕ῌ῔῕ῐῑ῏῍῎+ῌ1

῍ ea ῏῎Taῐ

ea+.,.ῌ῎῍A ῌ  !-`p^ #!"# #!2<-,- Ta  !"#!$ %K& ' (ῑd/  Brutsaert +31/ "#!)*+, )*$ E  p-d l!V;/

"#$-.!

-2 van Bavel and Hillel, +310 ; Camillo

23 4!'/ 01.+* /* 56 3*ῑ !789 )*"#$!-: ;/ ea #$!<=-->
 "#.!<=--> 3!?2<=,
(ῑ0 a 
+**

D!E

#@ABC ;/ DOY,1. C)!

FGH- + IDJ-KLMA' `p^ H -and Gurney, +320
HCa
E

TsTa
rH

῏
῍

rvsrvarvrsῐ
῍E )+, 5 NOPQ)* Ca #!RS'V!%& %J m-RSTU q* !'V E )!WXUῌ

K+& Ts 56 Ta 3 4 56"#!$IYWX!Z[-I[\/ ]ID^_`%K& rH ' !(¡G¢£ %s m+& rvs abV:WX:c d   DOY-** ef

!U#) %kg m-& rva "#!U#) %kg!gK?hi!j8VWX?-!km-& rv 56 rs 3

2 3 lm!nD5 E WX?gK?!

)!oAp?

qr:

 ( ῑ0

4

U#Y1,(¡G¢£-¢£ %s m+& ' 5 ¤*
'!(¡G¢£ rH -'!(¡G¢£ rv

b  >\s:t nD DOY/** C

DOY/,* u¥¦+: ! l§ rHrvra -:  (¡G¢ 5cWX?-gK?' +!E£ ra   !(¡G¢£ "#!¨L©2

oAp!?-3!Ivwx;/2 D`p^¢£: 3!ª«¬­pB

 yRz"{ "  :¬^-® ¤  U#Y!¢£ U#!E )9)!

 u D!E )!WX?|}'2
gK?}- !r@ Saito et al.

,**0 >~M D  )2 I

2$¯°C ,c±U#`p^1,¢£:

(¡G¢£ ra   !"#!²³Q

D'V QT/ 2E )!

!´²C ;/?!L :

 uV - u !-: l!

/ WX K2!:

2 -Q"#!µ²³ª«4¬­ ® +*1 ¯ ,**1

88

ῌῌ0

<;+?]^_Ah ¡¢ £X Q£¢¤¥ : a +331 ¦ +* § +  DOY,1.¨+, § -+  DOY-0/ b +332 ¦ / § +- 
DOY/**¨+332 ¦ 0 § , ©

L zm Q  ARS+ #L,ATS+QUVW Campbell, +321 XY+Z[\]^_A`abV 2%&Q#L+ ῑ ῍zref d zH῏ΐra , lnY ῌ
ῐ H῔uk ῒ ῎zH) DbV F+,-KL zHῑln῍zref d zm῏ Y ΐ
ῒ ῎
ῐ m῔
zm
k *.. zref#$ zref !m s +" d&fgbhQi+ WXA`abV./'LQjbk
#LAl- mn +33. ohMLNOPQ ./'pFq TarTs +s28MQ* tu

%v7+*wFῌxFyWz{|}2~[+)* +,-./'01234

Qi5 ./'q TsrTa +s2MQ

!m" u&'( !m"῍ῌ cd+Le567+*89:;<=>?@./'#$A* s<2BQi+,bV GHIJ

)BC- zH  zm

+pNO ) ./LQsL2

DEF+,-./' GHIJ KL !m" YH  Ym
+,-MLNOP ! "F$ Ts Tar*.+ Qi  sML  )) +,-K* NOP Q+%&Q Camillo and Gurney,

?GRº¥» : 4+u ῌª¼1S

+320  d  * 89

4 van Bavel and Hillel, +310s  zref  +./ m  , m  Camilo and Gurney +320 $")*+0 *.**/*.**+ m Oke, +312 ;  a%ῌt%DbcdE+,-.

 zrefzH, zm ,*** !"#$% &
ra'

uv2w1$I]23x rs  44yz5$ {_"] #K`

van de Griend and Owe+33.  24|6]3x47]J 2+ ῑ ῍zref῏
ΐ
ln
(YH ῌ
῔
uk, ῒ ῎ zH ῐ3x2u I}+ ^=I=+H~ῑln῍zref῏(Y ΐ z z zῒ ῎ zm ῐ m῔ ref H m)*+,-.-$ /  0
1 2)+3-4 56789:

8$,-! +9J.

r*ῌexp-/.0-*.+/Pq*
rs'
r*

q*῕*.+/
q*p*.+/;<= Richardson number Ri >?@<ῌABCD

 r* '+* :;8$<uuv2

EF9G L Monin-Obukhov  MO length$]3x=J{ 23x >?

+H2) +3- * Ri  L

I=J,-4 ,***  -/.0- Dc<b9 q* 2 +cm @uA -$T ?G Camillo! KL?@<ῌABCDEF9G L

and Gurney, +320 >I=?G Kondo et al.,")+MN. van de Griend and Owe,

+33* 49RL4 hLT2@+33. 

uA q* I=N

racaTau*L'
kgH




-. 

1 4+u ῌ%w1BC$2
J2%DbcdE G +,-.-$ u* OP+

ῑ ῍zref῏(Y ΐῒ ῎ zm ῐ m῔

u*'uk ln

D8$HLG9 Ee/+
\J.

1 $

DOY,2*  DOY-** 1GQRL !S+T0 O +U

9 ¡ jk?+\] ¢F£ Rn, a%D

V$ W=+XVJ. 

bcdE H, "¤t%DbcdE LE s./Y O4 Z4[+\]

,- 2DbcdE G G9 +¥?@<ῌABCDEF9G L +)^!$,-. G+ ¢F£J2$¦H4L.%


H# $ )$_"J= #K` 

G9Ia%DbcdEJ§¤ 2¨F$a%DbcdE H )+efg`£RL ©2DbcdE+$JKR

h i&Jjk4 )'l$ mL ª«$HL DOY,30 ,31 ,33 G$¦n(!S&J.W z 'zrefῌL +H zo* ))¬4N.­®|6J t%DbcdEG zp* *$) zp+ ) 1.

+ L¯+JM5$°R DOY,30 ­¦ G+

z'* +, )*

t%DbcdE { a%DbcdE±L­ )

®$ °R{N "#$J,-.

)*! $"NKL/ῌz
Yh'Ym'/2DbcdE G  4+%w1²N.O

*ozo+


zp+

)) ! KL Camillo and Gur-

. vP E  uv2w1IJ0.
-/  ῌney, +320

῍ῌῐῒῌῑῌ῎ ῏ ῏῎ῐ῍Yh'P,ln

῍+(+P+0 z ῏Pln῍ῌῐῒῌῑῌ῎ ῏ ῏
῎
ῐ ῎
ῐ
,
῍
*.,/

Ym'P,ln(,arctanq+P+0 z*.,/rPp,)* -$T Ri +HNK./T $]2DbcdEJ0. 1



- ³R 2 *.+/ *.0 +., m $
-0/ G¯ + Q¯ ªjk?"¤m?+ 2$\] 1. 3 $

DOY./*  ,/ G¯³R

ª&+2\J. 2ªG&´µ+Z¶·³R *.0 m  +., m ª jk?m?
Q&+"{§¸J  2 ³R *.0 m 
m?¹1$0Tjk?"{§¸J» X72 Y +*1 ¼ ,**1

90

῎ῌ1

b«7¬­®¯5°ª±#²O +331 V +* ³ +/  DOY,3* .C +331 V +* ³ ,/ DOY-**´µ¶·&Kmn M¨`©'ª vW¸ ¹¨`©'ª S¨`©
'ª ¨`©'ªº  

*.+/ m

6>

k?U A@ee@[L*  +     L* , 0=3ῌ3     +   !"#$\  +eC6>\\56Z gh&i

 %&'-./)*+,-.

* Ye.CeAB\+,

 + /   012324*B @ee AC ,e0 \+

56789&:;<=->? @ AA*, 6[,d(B4-C> -0/ DEF

,BG /++A* O0,

H I* +J,H  KAL

ῌ+*  M  N0OP Q0  $ *.+/ mQ0  RS3T 

Q0U$ *.0 m VW

Q0

,XY*Z DOY0** VR !RS[L\ 
ZL* ,m-ῌ0 ῐ῍ῌ῏ῒῒῑ!"]^_#,, m  N0!"



56%`7&a7b[[,cdCe

opqrDEFd+,, , 0
3

G++ , +,x*$+, ῌ

 RS Z DOY.** , RS ?.L

DOY0** O 

Q0G,.

WH + cmI** H + cme @eV Q0J

,XYZ J

K  L DOY.**. 0 J C $%  G ,Gf & e g h& T+L+,. M.*"Pij'Z4k(*l)*Ce gh&i

Q0|$ Kmnopqr+s @*| NP,

,x[ DOY.**   Q0  ,[ -./tZ0 =d+, + +,  
\ 'v

./Uu1$

gh&i 0 w\ A   J3NOP e 

01Q e\[ N e
.L0TB *0=4}B¡¢ +310 ῌ++F$

DOY.**   Q0 x)2/3*h&ik43$+,5>B + cm  Ce   yz)Z+,{* .B --AI* +e  R+1x)2Z

gh&i56V|+, h&i }~37Z856,$|9$:BU ;AUZ

C 

U<Ce* , 0=3 3$/* cm 01OS1BT£*+,¤¥[ NP )f  ¦| P,Z | U §_0O
P0T ¨`©'ª e P ¡¢£¤¥ : ¦*§ "#ῌ¨©ª

ῌῌ2

91

+331  +*  +  QDOY,1.S b. +332  3  -*  QDOY0-3S "\7 *.+/ *.0 +., m!*z{ QS
 QS 

TU!hij#ka9 +l01jcda  !"#$%& 

8mn HI7/9:' ^ DOY.** !' ()  *+,-./ *o VW!pa DOY0** q V *+,01 *2 34

rXs! +/t 1u:' *+,01*$*+,567/ *+,01 8 34

DOY.**

9:'  ! ;<"=>?@A)!BC+/t y8 GW9:'DEF7: *+,!G HI7
/  GJK"LM=>?@A34'

 +*t vwxW!pa DOY0**;<"ῌ"LMῌ%&z{|f}~



 ~

}GsG"#ῌ*#k& |

QDOY0**. . RS TU~  ' a9 ῌ ῍ ῎ b. ;<"ῌ"VW XYZ"[\7] / cm 01^ _`LM =>?@A| s!~  V

a9:' aba cdef$g DOY0*+ !

 K2!;<"z{ .

NO P῏+,  DOY0**  

/0123 4 +*1 5 ,**1

92

ῌῌ3

+332  -  ,.  DOY./*  +332  .  +2  DOY.1/      !"#

 *.+/ *.0 +., mῌῌ+*+331  +*  +  DOY,1.  +332  3  -*  DOY0-3 ,.* m $%&' () *+, -&' .) # *.+/ *.0 +.,

»SYJ¼^c : ῍"# ῌ$%&'()*ῑῌ+++332  , « - q ¬DOY.**­ ®¯ * 3VQ, « . q ¬DOY.*+­ ®¯ * 3 ..2 3k°±²³῎ ¬´µ­ O$ ¬¶µ­·¸¹º 



ῑῌ+,93+332  2 « ,+ q ¬DOY0**­ ®¯ * 3VQ
2 « ,, q ¬DOY 0*+­ ® ¯ * 3 ..2 3 k° ±²³῎ ¬´µ­ O$ ¬¶µ­·¸¹º-Eῌj%3kklmnopIPQ :! qSTUVQrkagst>1RSTU ῑ
uv(wxy! :sWXYZT[\]z.ῌ ῍ ῐ ῏ ῎{|}ῌ~ ῌ0- 7 

 ! "# ῌ$% &'()*+,-! ./ῌ01ῌ

2345

D`a+  O7->,+ WXYZTst>WXYZT[\]^! 

6789! :; <-=> ?@ABCD

ML ,!

EῌF GHIJ-! K1" ?@LF

>"#῏O$

 ?@AB+ :
+ k

(

456

ML?@ N=O789-=>! PQ

! 9z  b*ST

+1RSTUVQ! ML WXYZT[\]^U 6t+ : !  ¡xy+

! ?@AB_`a-=>! bῐ>^c

1$ ῌ d% ῌ efst>! ?@AB,+89+

i! ¢£¤ , m ¥"# &'k-¦$%(w§

1$ῌd%ῌefg 1RSTUI! Ehi45-¨©mopj%)*ª+¨<y » +*1 ¼ h,**1j94 






    

mental Biophysics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Campbell, G.S. h+321j :  < h  !"#$%

= ῌ>¡ ? ¢@j £A¤/¥ >¦§ &' (  ) &&'  *Chung, S.-O. and Horton, R. (+321) : Soil heat and+,-./ 0 12 340 567  8 9/&'! :;<=&' (>  ) ?@67

water ﬂow with a partial surface mulch. Water
Resour. Res., ,- : ,+1/ῌ,+20.
Ephrath, J.E., Goudriaan, J. and Marani, A. (+330) :ABC&' Modelling diurnal patterns of air temperature, DCEFG   HIJ

radiation, wind speed and relative humidity by*

equations from daily characteristics. Agricultur-'/ KL/ !M 9*?

N ) (

 "" 

al. Sys., /+ : -11ῌ-3-.

O ; K!M*#PQ?# $%!FAO. (+33*) : FAO Penman-Monteith Formula. In) R     &

Report : Expert consultation on revision of FAO

0 2 3 40 ST

methodologies for crop water requirement. May, /U  V 'WFX#3Y0 &';()Z  ) ;[\] ^_`a3bc,2ῌ-+. Rome, Italy.
Fayer, M. J. (,***) : UNSAT-H version -.* : Unsatu-

 *?# ;) ` ,5;+

rated soil water and heat ﬂow model. Theory,Luser manual, and examples. Paciﬁc Northwest'WFX#3!

 d,-.,

G

&'

! )

National Laboratory, Richland, WA.

K/U  e^/ HYDRUS-+D

Fuchs, M. and Tanner, C.B. (+300) : Infrared thermom-

DO! f0g h,**1 1 ++ i6%j  e^/k

etry of vegetation. Agronomy J., /2 : /31ῌ0*+.

lmO ) e^/ HYDRUS-+D  &&Gregory, J.M. (+323) : Wind data generation for Great(?`Onopq;r,s5#u )v 9/&'wW3z{|}~') tPlains locations. In : Proceedings of AmericanKx2ySociety of Agricultural Engineers, Internationalpq _4

Winter Meeting. New Orleans, LA.

kl DC ) r, !5%Gregory, J.M., Peterson, R.E., Lee, J.A. and Wilson, G.

    ?@= 

R. (+33.) : Modeling wind and relative humidity

6

 &&(!

e#ects on air quality. International Conferences 7@89

XO

ST#$hhydrus-grp@bio.mie-u.ac.jpj)

῏Zq

on Air Pollution from Agricultural Operations.
Midwest Plan Service, Ames, IA, p+2-ῌ+3*.

῎: S * Scanlon ;wW/ )ῌ ῑ ῐ ῍
Brunt, D. (+3-,) : Notes on radiation in the atmos-

Hopmans, J.W., Simunek, J. and Bristow, K.L. (,**,) :Indirect estimation of soil thermal properties
and water ﬂux using heat pulse probe measurement : Geometry and dispersion e#ects. Water
Resour. Res., -2 (+) doi : +*.+*,3/,***WR****1+.
Jury, W.A. and Horton, R. h,**0j :¨<©

ῌBῌªῌ<«¬& ­'®© hX

phere. Quart. J. of the Royal Meteor. Soc., /2 :¤¯C ¢@ : °±²ῌD ῌ³´ Eῌµ-23ῌ.+2.

¶$·ῌFG¸¹@j HºI >¦§Brutsaert, W. (+31/) : On a derivable formula for longwave radiation from clear skies. Water Resour.
Res., ++ : 1.,ῌ1...
Camillo, P. J. and Gurney, R. J. (+320) : A resistanceparameter for bare-soil evaporation models. Soil
Sci., +.+ : 3/ῌ+*/.
Campbell, G.S. (+311) : An Introduction to Environ-

Kirkham, D. and Powers, W.L. (+31,) : Advanced Soil
Physics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Kondo, J., Saigusa, N. and Sato, T. (+33*) : A parameterization of evaporation from bare soil surface. J. of App. Meteo., ,3 : -2/ῌ-23
Kondo, J., Saigusa, N. and Sato, T. (+33,) : A modeland experimental study of evaporation from

STUk<lm : n8Q Rῌ'(=op5qr

bare-soil surfaces. J. of App. Meteo., -+ : -*.ῌ-+,.

 +33. : 

NOP8Q R45STU-./ VWX 8  !

HI JῌK!LM ,**0 : ]^_`a : J.R. Philip

Y Z[\ +*. : 0-ῌ1-.

 ,*** : 
"# 
& +310 : '()*+‘imu‡nek, J.ῌK!LM ,**0 :
JῌS

ῌ

  

$%EFGῌHI95

and D.A. de Vries b c'()*+-./def,-./0

1

gQ R45hij 8Y Z[\ +*- : +*/ῌMonteith, J.L. and Unsworth,M.H. (+33*) : Principles

Scanlon, B.R., Christman, M., Reedy, R.C., Porro, I.,

of Environmental Physics, Second Edition.

‘imu
S ‡nek, J. and Flerchinger, G.N. (,**,) : Inter-

Edward Arnold, London.

code comparisons for simulating water balance2345 6789 #:;< 0+ : +ῌ2.

=>?@ῌABC ,**/ : D67

ῌ

++,.

 

of surﬁcial sediments in semiarid regions. Water

Nimmo, J.R. and Miller, E.E. (+320) : The temperature

Scanlon, B.R., Reedy, R.C., Keese, K.E. and Dwyer, S.F.

dependence of isothermal moisture vs. potential(,**/) : Evaluation of evapotranspiration covers

characteristics of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., /* :for waste containment in arid and semiarid re-++*/ῌ+++-.

gions in the southwestern USA. Vadose Zone J., 

Noborio, K., McInnes, K. J. and Heilman, J.L. (+330) :Resour. Res., -2 (+,), +-,-.

. : //ῌ1+.

Two-dimensional model for water, heat, and‘imu
S ‡nek, J., van Genuchten, M.Th. and Sejna M.

solute transport in furrow-irrigated soil : I.

(,**/) : The HYDRUS-+D software package for

Theory. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J., 0* : +**+ῌ+**3.

simulating the movement of water, heat, andNoborio, K., McInnes, K. J. and Heilman, J.L. (+330b) :multiple solutes in variably saturated media.

Two-dimensional model for water, heat, andVersion -.*. HYDRUS Software Series +, Dep. ofsolute transport in furrow-irrigated soil : II. Field

Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California Riv-

evaluatoin. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J., 0* : +*+*ῌ+*,+.
Oke, T.R. (+312) : Boundary Layer Climates. Methuen& Co Ltd, London.
Ortega-Farias, S., Antonioletti, R. and Olioso, A. (,***) :Net radiation model evaluation at an hourly time
step for Mediterranean conditions. Agronomie,,* : +/1ῌ+0..
Philip, J.R. and de Vries, D.A. (+3/1) : Moisture movement in porous media under temperature gradients. Eos Trans. AGU, -2 (,) : ,,,ῌ,-,.

erside, Riverside, CA.
van Bavel, C.H.M. and Hillel, D.I. (+310) : Calculating
potential and actual evaporation from a bare soil
surface by simulation of concurrent ﬂow of water and heat. Agri. Meteo., +1 : ./-ῌ.10.
van de Griend, A.A. and Owe, M. (+33.) : Bare soil
surface resistance to evaporation by vapor di#usion under semiarid conditions. Water Resour.
Res., -* : +2+ῌ+22.
van Genuchten, M.T. (+32*) : A closed-form equation

Saito, H., ‘imu
S ‡nek, J. and Mohanty, B.P. (,**0) : Nu-

for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of un-merical analysis of coupled water, vapor andsaturated soils. Soil Sc. Soc. of Am. J., .. : 23,ῌheat transport in the vadose zone, Vadose Zone

232.

J., / : 12.ῌ2**.

  +*1  ,**1

96

῍ῌ

ῌῌῌ !"# $"%&'()!%&*+ # ,-'./01"23456/01789".:89";.!< =>. # 23456/01?23456@ !A# # B# CDE
F6GHIJKLMN1OPQRIS TUF6GVWXY# Z[,()!\,]^O_`
OPQ7ab < cd ,-'efghi%&*+"bQOP "9j# kPl., ;mW9";. < 9Sno# ,$8pq ! d# KrstuF6
Glkd o#NvwxbQF6Gyz{ 9";|}b~v.LP9";

S < 23456/017PQcdIS %&*+VW # ,{x !
L# o P"S l.!9";.!<E : ,**1  3  +/ E
E : ,**1  +*  +0 E

J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
GL
No. +*1, p. 31 +*0 ,**1

S. Takagi ,    *
Reviewing classical studies in soil physics“Analysis of the vertical downward ﬂow of water through a two layered soil”
By S. Takagi
Soil Sci., 3* (,) : 32ῌ+*- (+30*)
Jiro CHIKUSHI** Biotron Institute, Kyushu University, Hakozaki 0ῌ+*ῌ+, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 2+,ῌ2/2+, Japan
Key words : layered soil, unsaturated water ﬂow, pressure proﬁle, open system, closed systemuq*cd?.Z" -1- UxSy).

+    
!"]0uq Nsῌ+aO *<%1 z$ ]0uq

  # $%& '( !)*+,-./" 0 1 %/" 2

%&{Fq]. Nsῌ+bO *<%1|}1! Takagi !3% 4  N+3/2Of h2. E =/, E h

r



N:h

)Sy% h3? *c)*5 6*78%&  9/. O  S.~%3:; < 4%/" 

* =?!f N4jO *=68>=?./* @A%/C

BD EFGH I
JKL !" M~%)*%"Takagi N+30*O Pq)5-!h N6jO **3?

a ~%)*<-" 7 N+3/.O 3-. Navier-Stokes  X,[\  . ) Q1?RSTU

VWX)*S. Y>Z:; 4?.3

E 0u N< E

O  !W=

3>?.%/w CX,3)*[\", 
+3.* !14 +3/* !1.

))
 

 6j*4j£/9/.x.)y"  ¤amn¥y¦§ ]^_`a%" E" b#*cd?

6j$%I/ K=?.3 E.; «C>3 ZSye&'( !14 !" f g1& hi/jkl)mn
H-.

C9

¡X?@A¢ %1"ru/8X,9:-, op* +q r)* ,41=?./ Nsῌ+O" sῌ+ /. *& , op1
4h-tT. u/ 6v] !w]0Eu¤aAg1/¨©ª C¨B¤a)u*D¬" ]- 4j¨ E& ¤a)E ;*­)*

)?4
Z%

/"


jS.

r®¯ ~%

w C?4j°±£/,²³F-./* ´µ rG¶oH·¸¹º` »2+,ῌ2/2+ I¼J³K 0ῌ+*ῌ+: 

 3 u/8 6j 4j1~ » +*1 ¼ Y,**1Z98ῌῌ+Fig. +

RX$ , BCab    

     !" # $ %
 &



Water pressure proﬁles in two-layered soil under steady ﬂow of water inunsaturated condition in open system, (a) with and (b) without the constant pressure zone.

'()*

+,-

./

A3  } ~+5E$88  !
x$LM N &q1t9
1$





q1'+H$8 Buckingham

01213 '(,45+67

-r

2X221 W(q891$ :;< Takagi =67>?

1 Narasimhan Y,**/Z 91  W1@!+A31$

mE$ +2,, "kF)yi Y)*F BC DE$'(F8G8<H

+,-Z +.9/ 1;1;20 W-IJK LM NM O2HPQR

ik891v2lFu&1FS-TKU K$=8F

w289 **+Ek]lN v

$81V  '(FA31$ W#5

y+E lF$F

X82$'( Day and Luthin Y+3/-Z $ lW¡8q $ Buckingham - hijk$ [\]+^ , BC _`+J1 a lFE /91F W¢,~b 8#cd+ef8E$Fg£1 Buckingham 1¤)89WFhijkl m #$=8+n9 9593L

2¦4+=op n91$ 01 F§ ¨i©ª5«¬­N®¯$1 q1r stu121 B

LRX$

g$1.¥8KX2hijk

ª5«¬­DE$6°±7 C  v+59 @!wm+!xe4

$F e±72'(M²³$

'() Kisch Y+3/3Z

E$ $

$ W Takagi 2DG< + "6=8 $ Kisch '( Buckingham  )y*8´~>?1  /+#3 yzuhijkl Y ** +.9 E2K:  98



{|8

$8D{Z +%1 w@!+µ¶·j¸i+a¹9  \ º

º± : S. Takagi X », lm3u.dz39





     Buckingham 



 

 !"#$%&' (&)



*+,#, - ./01"#23 4 567#, 8 
9 :; "# /0 < 9.=

 S\¼

99

#,  CD Takagi "#  E
F.)G3

&G , lm[!

S\ .G ' &G[!vZ Dacry &'vZHI C ¡ΐ, ¢3l

Takagim3u £[!.S\3  ¤J>?@AB.C3 D)E3

wm ¥` H+ zm ¥` H, 4F.3,"DG 

L9 H* zK L9 H-

8 H Buckingham $%

I Richards 1"#JKL
9MN- ORichards,+3-+P Richards QR .ST&D"

D) BuckinghamI25,T

8 H UV W.XY Z
[!

=> OKisch 8*g.#,P Q .)G 

3mv,# wK

AB  9£[!3K3mM ;N.¦b  |6yv,#¡ ΐ+a1T&;N%l` 0O

O+30*P 19

UVDG<GD`#,

-§ Takagi 9-; !,1"#lm
3m. / } P¨Z#, }-' wm

S\UVK] +3/* "¨wmO; P ©M¨ <Q¨ zm ©M¨# Philip O+3/1P ^ Klute O+3/,P 1"#SDzm¨  ªP¨)#  .=

 $G> S.¦b#,

UV%_`ab +30* "#cdONarasimhan, ,**/ ; Raats and van Genuchten, ,**0P

"# Takagi
ingham&']4# 3  Buck-^ Richards `G Philip ^ Kluteef(G#,   
# Y*g+bG#,) 
v«¬k

(*
(y

ῌ

)

D`   v R­G  R­4F' S

)®9T k !9; y zF¯ °U±V * 93*g<,+bG&,hi"jk9W ²³X  Y &"#,´` * -ῌ

Takagi ῍῎ῑῒῐ῏lm[! Nn*«[!:# -..)o3p/90.)o312 +qr#, st 1T 90 lm3uvZ[!
 wm4 5xy zm{ |6y.& 
G , } y [!S\~,.r3K G#, O +3/2P Takagi <,&+,lm[!S\ g.
.Y

 8 S\ [!S\.Wb"# , } ' Takagi
8.7G#,8sK 9 k
G } [!%:|6y5xy'!9; k ; p

:;,T

l3

|

6y Y ' 5xy l&,.p/ U
V+q`  Takagi

S\v,#

 |6y.~"#,.<#, )T} 

[!vZ  =

p
¬y
rg

῍

   p r g 8µ; 9 4 ¶;·Y 
wm¨  y«*῎pῌ v ¬+῎y¸H
«¬
*
῍k+ ῏
rg

῏

-

  k+ wm!9;  zm

¨


*«

v
OH¸H-¬yP¬H
k,

ῐ

-
p
ῌ v ῎OH¸H ¬yP¸H
«¬ +¬
῍ k,῏
rg

   k, zm
 y«yB v1¹ y«yE&'CD`

ῌ .

v
y¸H*
k+

*«¬

>  Takagi 8 =>"#8  *&'"# + "s Kisch O+3/3P

AB

3

g.#,   4 hiDG?@#AB* "jk3 Takagi*«H*ῌ v ¬+῎y «H*
῍k+ ῏ Bῑ

!9; H«H+¸H,
 p«*

DGῒ

~R  +*1

100

ῌῌ,
Fig. ,

Takagi <Z[H?\(~B!F Takagi, +30*

Water ﬂow system that Takagi analyzed in a two-layered soil (after Takagi, +30*).

 prgh & D / hh* 

ῌ+ v ῎HH y H
E
῍ k,῏

vk,h* !"#$%& '()* 



dx
ῑ
yyB
ῒῌ vῌk+x+




H* k+
dx
ῑ
H+
ῒῌ vῌk+x+
vk+




k+xdx
H* k+
ῑ

H+
ῒῌ k,h*k+x k,h*k+< h*ha  aK+ BLM..H32&
N'OP$QR. '( 

+ '(



+ 7()*   +  yE   +ST 7(+UFVF W-X<YF& , ^_`$abH32& Uc.^ ] defEB^23
&   +ghijk.lBmῌ῍k,nvnk+ +

H*῎
H+῏




pc.^
23

B^23& q+ B
r4$stBu H32<<vw.Fxu yzH2

89:; yyE  h* 
dh
ῑ
yEy
ῒῌ +vῌk,h

v
k,h

o"$DH32&7()* 
dh
v

+
dy
k,h

@AB23 Takagi IJ:;.H3 +

 +ghm.
. >? 

 +$123 v $456.
῍ῐ

Zaslavsky +301 BC3DEF32& ?GH  +Takagi Z[OP\(]C / xh* .0  +$12.
῍ῐ.7()* .8 yD

 +  yB   +ST)*   prgx & '+$,-.
῏

& +<=>& Gardner +3/2 +$12?  +@A    k+ k,  k+   k,   
dx
v

+
dy
k+x

῍ῐ

dh
ῑ
yEyDῒῌ +vῌk,h pp*rgh*  *h*y ῎,**1



.$DH32& ^>0

'(>{.l2H , (89|07r4} <¹º : S. Takagi »,  2(YXI33{|¼

 j 
 j9:<!j/
:; 3[\  h*  v (/;.  Takagi (<=v =3 o3`ab( h*+ / ;BTakagi   



101  Behnke and Bianchi

+30/  !"#$%&'()$*+,&-.

/j3>(c/ h

H * 3?d H * mh *+ joPB3J y ; I h
( k   

3 hi

0 1(   23456789:; (<jk῏ῐ k+hdh uym k+H*mh*+ῑ῏ῌ῍ k+hmv
vmk+

= >3?@ A;B(CD;  E+FG

@A XPB  `ab( h*, / X

Zaslavsky +30-  Takagi 3H/; j
;B 3>(c/ h

IJKLMN/ 9:

mh*, ( k hi

O3PQRSTKU9:O3PQR
S(V W H* XYZ 3[\῏ῐ ῌ῎ k,hdh uH nH m k,H-mh*, my+,ῑ῏ k,hmv
k,mv

23]^

_I`ab hC (c/ 9:d E+ 3K e3 fgRS( hi

H- 3?d H-jk :3j  ; I h  Takagi 3
mx mh :;B  j( ;(0CDE(FG jk

ῌk, m+῎mh ῌk, H+ n+῎
῍k+ ῏ C῍k+ H, ῏

H*lH+

A! W H* opZ 3[\ hiῌk, m+῎mh
῍k+ ῏ C

H*qH+




:3rs )t*yuH+d hCu* 3v

:3jA"/

huh* Hv

CDE h*  v


 jk




v 3K  j(<!j/{<d ? y 0 h

0 Srinilta et al. #XI[\ oX3PB ./ A;B I¡{|J(H/ : Takagi

KH/ k, h 0 Gardner e3 k,huabῌ¢bnhmhCa£ hi

jk ;   a, b, a 

3K 3fRS #Iw3

 j3¥ ¦L/
>3¤] *lal+ (  

$%TKUXTx!yO33f&(§ A;B>33 ,/?

/ cz: /9/ {|(}= * $/ o3I

RS $%IJ H* '(/  H*

Kd)v~ X3IKd~ j  Takagi 343A"(H/?@ 

)v~'(K  #XI, 3^* op/]d$%#X



IMN I3+o ,/Srinilta et al. 39: ,* M¨©N Warrick

XTI-O3fg(.:9and Yeh +33*  Takagi, Zaslavsky, Srinilta et al.

/ Zaslavsky, +301

3{|J(O /  29:3ª0{|(Srinilta et al. +303  Takagi +30* Kisch +3/3

/:@3

Zaslavsky +30- +301

C=AP{«Q/

(Q

/ 

= d0oX3 IJ13;  s )t* 3MN(V=23o¬33 ­R®(0¡/78(QL Srinilta et al. 378?@ 

 ST  :­R¯3UQ/V°¯3 $ o3IKd)X3

Qv

IKd

Takagi 343A3?@±W +300 V°¯378(Q B X

A"/  $X35

3o1 , 3^7 9:f/ > X!}Q, IJ36)6)/ o33/ XA;B

6)

 : A;B X ; Kisch 3?A"/ Srinilta et al. X3PB®(²³/

op/  -´/µ¶3­R¯·; , 3^7

E+a (Y(= :3?@ U8(dL E+b 3K 

ZQ[\ +303 ]¸ +32+ 3?@A8X3 9[\13;

"/

[\

Q·¸¹º » +*1 ¼ F,**1I102





   ῌ 

UTV:&:,(῎]-!"#`a .ῌ. ,xy ¡¢£¤#¥ 9 !

$%&'()*+,- .ῌ- /0#?9TV7W¦§ TV TV7Wῌ¨©u 1 234 56 789(:ª#«¬9r- ­ TV £¤®zW¯_

234 5

0( 7Wz;TVL°0?

!";<=>?@  !"A

B$%9CDE9, FKisch, +3/3 ; GH +31.I
 1  !"$%JKL$%0(, FMN +32+I=>OP QRST =>!UTV7
W(XYZ[\- ;]TV7WY
9  ^ F+3/-I _`a F+30*I bcd,ef\- ^ g!hijOU=>k;]lmS
TnoY0ef#pqr- g!1sZt῏u=>;  =>!vwxy2z{|9TV(,[?῍#}~()?#0 Fair bindingI &r- ^ TV7W
Henry  C(9 ;<D

EJ{|ST #/0( {|9rS
TTV& TV)T ῌῌ.

0 TV:,T q&,(#/9- (U TVr,{|STC1\[ !4 psJTVῌῌFig. -

C0(Fig. .

®³xy´!#?9rOPTV
7Wµ¶ F`a +30*I
Emergence of air bubbles in the expandedzone during water ﬂow through the glass
pipe. Time elapses from I to IV. (after Yahata, +30*)

!¦$%(±²Changes in water pressure proﬁles due to the elevation of outﬂow
pressure in (a) open system and (b) closed system.

º» : S. Takagi D §, :w ¼3-ij«

 

       

!"# - $%&  '  (agitation) *
+, -./0123 45 678

103

rO7VstNuv0 I C, .gh
HAC FhJ$-; a-*+,55 EK-H  L5 ,A
EA-;ῐ/ JtNu/MNO

:9:;<=- > ?-@ 5

w [f,> P 30 AQ¡A#A BCD#,  E#A
F (+300)

Fh :w33'

> 30>!I 30> t G'HA!I Nu/'¢£¤ (ῐ/a) 8 .

9 J3KL> MNO/!"Hgh :w3'> tNu/'¢R

JPQR0ῐSRῌOTU7V!"#$ 9

 %& 3KLWK XY0' 
 Z [\  'G() $A]^_A XY0*+`  ab ,c (+32+)

P;¢£¤ -¥#5eI

$5#A $E Y  q WK E #A (ῐ/c) $A S (+3/*)hi¦ § F

4%& ¨ <|T ¨ 'WKKnA

Fd (Henry !" $A e !) .gh 4%&,nC9  ©U,-Ef.ghG'/01  

ª<|T ;#A« ¬­A JV<$ijXY0 2A=-©®  ῐ/b , J#4%&©®°A 3KL0ῌ ῒΐ῔ῑ῏῍ῐ
Takagi 3

Fh.gh ¯

W±C£¤²X`,'kl 4%&3KLWL'.gh ¬ Gardner, Brooks and Coreym5 '-;k6C,n Gardner (+3/2)(+30.) van Genuchten YWK} Z$#A .g

7ij5 WL k (Y) ( Y(oppῌ( rg))hG$A-+k .gh Y  q 

qrO7VstNuv0)2 8 +3/* 965

 :wx 01;WLsyzR{<|=}~A>? k (q) ( q
WL'
George (+3/*) 5@3A)

_- Childs and CollisMualem (+310) B van Genuchten (+32*) WL}C5- D
EnA#A - FhH:

30G AH aCaC tNu/ 4%&%&H:q῎ῌ/
Fig. /

WK K-H  a-  k WKC³#5n aª .ghH: k (q) ,Ak (Y)J'­;5´[#nA

aµ# F (+300)m Irmay (+3/.) } ?

῏ }¸A .ghij\$A ¶·D ῌ
k(q)okS kSA)(SpS*)(+pS*)-῎
῍%&3KL S (oqῌn ;  n

30%& S*x

¹30%& (oq*ῌn ; q*

FhHJP.ghH:4%&©®tNu/WK

Unsaturated conditions contacting with tensiometer ﬁlter depending on
the type of air : (a) atmospheric air, (b) atmospheric and entrapped air,and (c) entrapped air.

¼"  +*1 µ ,**1

104  Irmay +,$ 567.89:;<=>? @A

Wycko# and Botset +3-0  ῎0 

BC:D3E +,FGH I?$ )*( !" # Wycko# and Botset CO, JKL$ )*MN-.OP5

 ῎1 $ %&'( NaCl )*(+67Q,$ CO, )*-.+,$ %/012+34

OPGH Y>$ )*ZN[/RS;TUV CO, -.WX

\][/  ^_ <`J$^_)*a῍ b  !"FcdV
ῌ

<e$

@ABC:DfE

2+

egU KhVi[/E< E jkJ?l<mH /Fnopq ῎/c 
jkJ?E <4<QrsFtLu<mv 4k/wxk3yz?V{F$ E F|yzh}~[/wxF
HV<FUV C.5. s
/(E n?d$  EF Dp z[/Ez Dp  $ wx C.5. k 3g$ ῎/ 
3y* s<<sF~gkUoz

1ῌ ῍ ῐ ῎ ῏
ῑῌ0Fig. 0¹Kº»a*4<4<sRelative speciﬁc permeabilities of air andwater depending on water saturation insand (after Wyko# and Botman, +3-0))* v<$ IjQL$ _ g3gy ?
¡¢jQ a£<F¤i`V3

ῑῌ1

Wyko# and Botset +3-0 F ?¥¦§ a§ CO, S;T ; b§ @ABC:DE 2+ ; c§ %/01C:D 
2+ ; d§ 567¨9;© E Dª«b =¬ <.89:; c =¬ ­® ; e§ -.ῌ(WXO¯° ; f§ -.ῌ(° ; g§ -.C:D ; h§ C.±9;²§ ³´µ¶·Fig. 1

Apparatus used by Wyko# and Botset (+3-0)’s experiment. a. CO, gas cylinder ;b. mercury manometer ; c. electric resistance meter ; d. soil column plus ring,
including ¸ pressure tap, connected with b, and wire screen, connected with c)e. gas and liquid supply regulator ; f. gas and liquid separator ; g. gas meter ; h.
graduated cylinder. (with alphabetical marks to the original ﬁgure)¸¹ : S. Takagi º »,  ¦-(-23¼ 








105

blanketed reservoir. Geotechnique. 3 : 3῎,+.

  !

Klute, A. (+3/,) : A numerical method for solving the"!"#$%& '( )*ﬂow equation for water in unsaturated materi- +,-&./0( Takagi  
- 1-2345 6 +
-

78

als. Soil Sci., 1- : +*/῎++0.

 u+300v : %2YZ-&'-YZx=>y |

9:; < -=> 

?-=>@ '(ABCD( $%ERn ,, u-v :,,/῎-**.

FGD(;H 8  Takagi Mualem, Y. (+310) : A new model for predicting the23I-JK=>-L

hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous me-8 M-N O!
Takagi 

dia. Water Resour. Res., +, (-) : /+-῎/,,.

PQ-R=>STUV u+303v : -&YZ! -E=>yWX! 88 YZC[PQE\] ^! Buckingham -_-

2`8a]H5b=>c-

'| ( +. u+v : +*0.
Narasimhan, T.N. (,**/) : Buckingham, +3*1 : An ap-

d8

preciation. Vadoze Zone J., . : .-.῎..+.

 Takagi eD( D fg g -Philip, J.R. (+3/1) : The theory of inﬁltration : +. The

R-hH=>cijklmno9inﬁltration equation and its solution. Soil Sci., '-pqc Takagi  e2- : -./῎-/1.

H

Raats, P.A.C. and M.Th. van Genuchten (,**0) : Milestones in soil physics. Soil Sci., +1+ (+) : S,+῎S,2.

ῌ ῏ ῎ ῍Richards, L.A. (+3-+) : Capillary conduction of liquids

Behnke, J. J. and W.C. Bianchi (+30/) : Pressure distri-through porous mediums. Physics, + : -+2῎---.

bution in layered sand columns during transient

Srinilta, S., D.R. Nielsen. and D. Kirkham (+303) : Steadyand steady-state ﬂow. Wate Resour. Res., + (.) :ﬂow of water through a two-layer soil. Water Resour. Res., / (/) : +*/-῎+*0-.

//1῎/0,.
Brooks, R.H. and A.T. Corey (+30.) : Hydraulic pro-)* u+3/*v : +YZ! y - + :perties of porous media. In : Hydrology paper -.
Fort Collins, CO : Corolado State Univ., pp. ,1.

3῎+0.

)* u+30*v : Y'(YZ῍y ¡¢£+-w5¤¥¦ §¨ y=~rst u+32+v : w5YZx=>y z{|R R!=>"} -- ~ : +῎-2.

u+v : +-῎+3.

Childs, E.C. and N. Collis-George (+3/*) : The permea-

Takagi, S. (+30*) : Analysis of the vertical downward

bility of porous materials. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lon-ﬂow of water through a two layered soil. Soil.

don, Ser. A ,*+ : -3,῎.*/.

Sci., 3* (,) : 32῎+*-.

Day, P.R. and J.N. Luthin (+3/-) : Pressure distribu-

,- ῌ  ῌ |©./ ῌ ª«0 ῌ |¬­

tion in layered soils during continuous water

u+31.v : ¦®-YZ¦x§¨E=>yﬂow. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., +1 (,) : 2,῎3+.

| n ,2 u,v : +*/῎++-.

#

u+3/.v : -&x=> uῌvYZw5+W$=> ,+ u0v :

2῎+-.

¯

° u+3/-v : ±"²³w5´-12!
y ¦µ¶·ny ,,/ : ,῎++.

Van Genuchten, M.Th. (+32*) : A closed form equa-Gardner, W.R. (+3/2) : Some steady-state solutions oftion for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of

the unsaturated moisture ﬂow equation with ap-

unsaturated soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., .. : 23,῎plication to evaporation from a water table. Soil

232.

Sci., 2/ : ,,3῎,-,.
Irmay, S. (+3/.) : On the hydraulic conductivity ofunsaturated soils. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union.,-/ (-) : .0-῎.01.
Kisch, K. (+3/3) : The theory of seepage from clay-

Warrick, A.W. and T.C. J. Yeh (+33+) : One-dimensional,
steady vertical ﬂow in a layered soil proﬁle. Adv.
Water Resour., +- : ,*1῎,+*.
Wycko#, R.R. and H.G. Botset (+3-0) : The ﬂow of gasliquid mixtures through unconsolidated sands.

2  +*1  ,**1

106

Physics, 1 : -,/ῌ-./.

 +3/2 : 

Zaslavsky. D. (+30-) : Theory of unsaturated ﬂow into

   !" 0 : +ῌ-*.

a non-uniform soil proﬁle. Soil Sci., 31 (0) : .**ῌ.+*.

#$%& +30* : '()ῌ*+,-.,/0

Zaslavsky. D. (+301) : Saturation-unsaturation transi-

12 3456   tion in inﬁltration to a non-uniform soil proﬁle.

!" +* : +ῌ-,.

Soil Sci., +*1 (-) : +0*ῌ+0/.

῍1789 0:;1<=>?@A ῌBC DEF5CGHIJ <K

LM65?N O PQRS5C T<UVTWXYTW0Z6[I< +30* \ Takagi CUV
T  456PQP]^_?N J  `ab cdBC  e<fgh5i5iIjk<lmM?N no pqBCUVT  rl_6XYT  s <tuvN
XYT BC wx `= GH1yz {|} ~B <FN
\p : ,**1 \ 0  ++ p\p : ,**1 \ +*  , pῐ ῑ ῏
J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
smtNo. +*1, p. +*1ῌ+*2 ῍,**1῎   *The Accumulation of Small Discovery and Error
Shinji SUZUKI** Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture,+ῌ+ῌ+ Sakuragaoka, Setagaya, Tokyo, +/0ῌ2/*,, Japan 

     

$& 756S.T%]u*$34 TDR FG*'+-.ryb, 0      

85ijklhc $* V' +!"#$ %&' (

K!H,dx,e S.T#)*+ ,Skk,Rf! ":% ;53<05=>#$?,

w2:6*  '% @&ABC' @&,(C$D*' )* ;565E+ FG, 

wC$ghD ijM* ' S.T

' -./01234565 ,7560859

yh/

*

kl

ea_mn o}pz5-N#*' $!HI-JKDLM ./,N#:qr?(IUv" ,N#O0  P1Q 2:2RS.TJK,LM$& kl $* smt}uc, NU34V5D*'  6
D 78 9:;<=v  *' " wxyz$& 75

 {|{},* bc,~  u6085>WXY53Z[5\5756,?*]D*'  ay)L#u wD:]BD@ AB 9^Cu] *' WD_*XY53Z[5\5,`*Da:' bc ;53<05=>#EdF@&,(' be 756085S.T,G* f5=2g52h&,-./0123

](fTD* {|{}#] (D C V(RwC%' ~ ,mVe  , yh/: ~l65kl 4565085HIijklhm

e  ¡$¢U, Mann-Kendall /£<¤

*' XY53Z[5\5ijklhJKV}

D* nLS.TMoNO* ,¥ ' $PE 7p62qr0iQRS"stK

D* bcSqr0

i!HTu]' :6 Uvwu xgyz{|D}VW~,* $& NXW~,YID] , #!H,NO

*' : {|{}~  Sir R. Fisher  05¦{yz§h~*$,*~¨$' ©(&&{UªW  aS.y

(D]«*  $ P%D¬­7',

f5=2g52h& Z[!Hijklh:NO  HIijklhm]

o$ *, $,} M % 3 \]

¡$2RC^u'$?

]  TDR _`a,,TDR !H756085+D]+,FG**

9® * wC%u5M¥:' ()>

*¯] 9  °±52h,!"¢M' $

¡yf52 £¤   x,²¡,V¦ e[y ,S

²§¨u ³´µB* ©·~(ª¸¹º©( »+/0ῌ2/*, ©·«¬­®¯¼ +ῌ+ῌ+



µ¶ L

OPQNR S +*1 T U,**1V108

 

   !"#$% & ' ()*+,  -. /0 (12, 3$
4567 89 :;<=>?@AB C

D EF$GH & B7IJKLM : ,**1 K +* L - M
INKLM : ,**1 K +* L / M῎῏

J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
+, ^$/
No. +*1, p. +*3 ῌ,**1῍Forest Environments in the Mekong River Basin
H. Sawada, M. Araki, N.A. Chappell, J.V. LaFrankie, A. Shimizu (Eds.)
Springer, ,**1 ISBN 312ῌ.ῌ.-+ῌ.0/**ῌ ,**/   

 IUFRO!"#$

%)*-

&'



()*+,

.'/0 1(23G  # )"'(/H~z#*t(HA

K#6 7J7 !" &')* (I(XJ

lO

(KD#

 = N.A. Chappell  ] 2L\@ M S.

45*6 (7 89*#$ :;4Sawano  ] +NO 8D#>P H. Saito )*<=> ?(#@

#$  .H5L tKH #  4

 A*B  .' CDEF !

oQRA'S)*TU'.7*6" & +,)*G .HV N.A. Chappell  WX& A

(#@*6* - O I#+,p Ferralsol, Acrisol, Alisol Y  +: !"  +, #  ,$  . #  -: %&  +* #: I!/HSZ#*t('7 tK +,p([JK#\]^_(Y `9eL  & DL MN #'(7 + O )"4P # XJH.aRAK*(ub<`'c7*6  +>R=SC

*6 M73d0'W7 +,p([\XW* +,!-W*#$

]^_ -B]!$./)*d0He-45*t

4  Q 0* m

T4U9V W*
YZ

-

& !"./)* .'0[*6 M 1 >C  2\./]>C-& A* X./ ^_=`a3/)* .

#$30[*6,4 b4c5 d6e*  .
=%>i)*4* g

#+,p4 +, !$./]+_-B(Mt4 +,!-]n!o >? & K+,p(=%p( -B

7& 8f#+9: -;g<]!" &
Bh ,* ('f7*6 teL  -q)* .#$H h4J

YiDd0(7I45*J'$d)*t(H4v*6.'0[j eu  !" & !¡¢ k£*6 M 1 >C  & =%>i(+jk?

9:(ulm(@nIe¤¥#+, d0'c¦7z*((3 §¨©L`|ªv«mO@ lO30[*6-4  .7&'

U9

3¬o­®(#@*6 K ¯p =%Am +,Am +,!-W* n!oW*Y

2Z =%p -B(+,p -B

3  +, $d /t(#*6 q)*=9* =%]%]+,qr °=±s.'0[*6 M 1 rTFs =]!" &²K³ WX& !"%(+,( lO30[*6

´u 5*vGzµw'¶26t eu  !" & +,- (xyz{ K|·¸¹|uv#w=x n2K yCD#YE<=>º»¼} : ,**1  3 ¼ +. }º$¼} : ,**1  3 ¼ +2 }'Fz{|)"(7 /}H~6 t eu#
J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys.
(6 
No. +*1, p. +++++/ ,**1

,**1  - ,**1  3  +. e,*   : ,**1  0  ,-    : 

  :     

fg,**1  3  ,+ e,0 "# :  #$ h% i &jkl mnop q!"#r' (s) tu) v*wp' "

$ %:
+&

# 2 +& 2 +xy : '' +3  ()*+,-./01 23 *45'6789:;

z$
+& $ % <=,&!"#>

-&

#?

.& @



1ῌ2 } ./!"#{|,}6~ 3 .
4+56 17 L00,**1  .   : ,**1  1  ,,  

8.9 ./  : 6

  :     ῌ¡6  ¢{£  ./01¤ ¥$¦!"#

1 $#].§¨©:?

$ %:
+&

 +*0

!"#{|,}6~  bQ00

ABC"#D"#EF6GH!{|,}6~ (6 6- ./ῌ  bQ001ῌ2 .

' +3  (6ª)*+,-./01

 )*+,-IJKLMN64O+PQ78

9:;&

RST6UVWX Y6Z

,&,**1  1   : 

  :     
&

!"#

,**1  /   : ,**1  3  +    : ,**1  3  ,3    : +&

' +3  (  :     )*+,-./01

 )*+,-I!"#

 xyF? [!«Y

$ %:
+&

' +3  ()*+,-./01&,**1  2  [!5'  :  $# \]6./01  :     !"# 6&,**1  0   : 

' +3  (+&)*+,-./01

 )*+,-6<=>¢{£4O+PQ῍!"#

?®@6¯°789:;  : ,**1  3  +/  ' +3  (+ + &;¬b­  : ,**1  +*  0    :     +&

 $# \]6±8)*+,-./01

 )*+,-I

&

,**1

H+3  +    : ,**1  +*  +-   +, : -* +- : ,/
&

,**1

^_`a :

H+3  -    : b$  :  ¸¡C   : cdV!ῌ"u²³´µ ¶AB·h º»¼"#!"# ¹

112ῌ   
 





            ῌ  


:

+

!"

,

 KB(- KB
 H;'

' 

,**0

($)* & ῌ+,- ($+, 

./  ($-" (2 ($

#$% &

C;/,Sijk vewxyz{|}~



,**1



;,-p C.;/, q#0r$% st1u

,**1,**1 H +3  +   : ,**1($* &($+*  +-  3 +- : -* +. : **  :  4=

  .3 0123456 789:6 ;< '



+

@5

n7: 4(,,**1

#$% &=(> > ?;< @AB

-

,**0

($)* & ῌ+,- CD;EF & GH;IJ KB

.

,**1

($* &/

 .3 0123456 789:60

CD;EF & GH;IJ

1

,**0



,**0


ῌCῌL;MNOP QR (-STUῌ

VW!;"XG PDF YZ[P;W! CD=(> > 6

7 89R:;#ῌ<#h +* ;EF ;#2O

ῌCS\]D^O4;_`ab#c^O4$

=%de&f CD +g/ ;EF¡f}¢£>¤¥¤;?@/A

GH;¦§P¨©

 h(Sijk ' 

2

H;'

 H;'

3

ª5

=(*()l;*mSijk nD +S=o(,**0 

ῌ 
¬ ,**0. .. +­ ,**1. -. -+

«,;B
" C

*d

)*d

® ¯

°
±
²
F (  ( E
= o (  ( E³´(Eµ  (  ( E
 1 F G ¶«,

,51./5/3*+50-052**.-5,**.*/5***-/5,**.**5***
1-.5,+*,51./5/3*+53305***
1/5***./*5****+2-500*+5+2.5,/3*-/35,**-+52**./5***· -/5,**· ,+05-.*./*5*.3

 $05***5***050-.5/*3

0-.5/*3· : «,¯DA¸(E+,+,*** 123¹E +3,,*** ºwx(
E V» =(¼³²

113


 



 

    


!
"

#
$
%



&

'
(
)

* + , -  . / 0 1 

-50**5***3**5***+/*5***/*5***+**5***/**5***/*5***
0*5***,**5****-5.2+53-1
2305**3.,5.**--50-0/15***,.1520*++5/1*
0*5***
015,,**++25*0-533++*150**+05-0.
.-5***,/,5+.*-25.-**+-,512**

234,-
567,-

/*5****-5+,3*.0521+*

489:,-
; < , = ,/*5****
3*5***+,-50+***+,05-3**
3*5***

vO

05***5***/5*,.5-1+

31/50,3w xy$

z+50+*5+-2z

05***5***050-.5/*3

0-.5/*3v O +*, +*- +*. >?@AB CD E&-B
FGHIJABKLMB;< )NAB
OPQ (<RSB'( . TU*+0V B
WXῌ2XῌY)Z[\B]./^_`
a,**.  bcd
3eῌfghMB
ijk:l +** >fg>mnopqrs
0tu567
?@;< -9:(<,=B{ :  ῌ|,**1 ῐ῏ῌ῍ῑ῎ ,**1. .. +
 ,**2. -. -+

}~
 



x
y
$
  -  
2 X  -  





 -    k  
}~+50+*5+-2+50+35,**/150**+325***,05.**-0*5***
2,2500,v O.51**5***-02 /,/** ,,*,.,****.2,. -,*** 1,,*** *.2++ ,,,/** ,.1,/** *.2
0 /,/** --,*** *.2  (
.A a0*,***d  a 3* d /%  a 0* d ¡¢ £¤B

114


v #

w$

x$

y z

 | } ~ &,51**5***-50**5*** 3**5*** &


&
'

&




&


&



w
(   =  &   ) &3**5***+**5***/*5***+**5***+**5***/*5***
0*5***+/*5****

3**5***+/*5***/*5***+**5***/**5***/*5***
0*5***,**5*****
 /*5*****
 .**5*****
 /*5****

{=&
%=&   =  & *   &$%&/*5******..*5***/*5****,/*5****
3*5*****
 ,/*5****-/*5***.51**5***05***5*** +5-**5***

¼

%

{

| +*/ +*0 +*1 +', +  0/* - 3* .  ¡¢& /=£¤b¥£¦ §¨©0,
1ª«
*  ¬,&*­&
 . ®2(&¯RῌRῌ°±²³´µ¶·,**. ¸¹
{=&º῍»34« : wz῎,**0 

  
,**0   

%  =

KLM 

%  =

N

%  =

P Q

R=



R=

UP VW

R=



R=

Y

O
ST
X

R=

P BZ

R=

[ 

R=

 \ 

R=

E 

]^=

_`abcdefg %  =h i ! ,**1  . " +0 #$%

%  =

 j

&'()*+ ,-.'/0%123 456

%  =

Pk

378 95&:;)<

%  =

lm nZ

%  =

U

%  =

Pongpatanasiri Sukthai῍ῌ  %  =,**1  +*  +3 

Q

>

?

R=

op q!

@A

R=

r s"

R=

t ju

%  =

7

%  =

BC D

%  =

E

%  =

 GH

%  =

BI J

F

115

 ,**1  +*  +3

   

: -1+



:



0

    : ,/

    

: ++





    

: .+: .2
: .0+

116

   

  

  !"#$ %!&'$( )* + ,-./+ 01(2%! .304567$ !8 9
 + :+ ;2;<!'8 9 =>? @*+ 4ABCD * 'E<+ 52F
GHIJ-!'$( 9 C` E Wab' 9
9 + 0!$`c defg h2`  + - / ;<!8 9% i` T! jk5* 1(p!*k29 + .30! F

%!;*9R`*q-S% ++ K ; L MNO-P2*%!

"#rs *!8 9

-QR 9! `'

0t$u v-wx9 %!'yz$

S+ GHTN! -UVW*X'+ F Y!& Z( [+ 

* +l$+  +*0 [W(.mnok %!(\+ ]^ -_


7*

.30


+
.  +
*7
7
.7

¢
3 0 +
3
0

!8 9 + {%.30&$+ | }!|~!v-W< Nwx* %, )- 4  /4+
0 4
1  4  23nῌU4nGH45 ¡6 4£ 78 4
¤¥ 9: 23nῌU4nGH¦§ ¨© ª«4'( ) /4¬­ ®¯4°;±©< 23nῌU4nGH@ ²< ³#4=´ µ¶ ·>4
¸¹ G) 23nº»GH¼

9
.30 '()



)*+),-.    !"# $%&'(/01 2*34*56 78&'9*:;01 ! 78&<=*>ῌ?@*ABC -.* ! DEFGHIJ<=
K+*1ῌ**/, LMNOPQR 3ῌ0ῌ.+ STRUVTEL : *-ῌ-.1/ῌ/0+2

FAX : *-ῌ-.1/ῌ/0+3

WX

YF

Eomail : kammori@msh.biglobe.ne.jp

Notice about Photocopying
In order to photocopy any work from this publication, you or your organization must obtain permission
from the following organization which has been delegated for copyright for clearance by the copyrightowner of this publication.
Japan Academic Association for Copyright Clearance (JAACC).+ῌ0 Akasaka 3ochome, Minatooku, Tokyo +*1ῌ**/,, Japan
TEL : 2+ῌ-ῌ-.1/ῌ/0+2



FAX : 2+ῌ-ῌ-.1/ῌ/0+3

Eomail : kammori@msh.biglobe.ne.jp

 +*1  F,Z[ ,**1 \ ++ ] ,* ^3

 

 

K2.*ῌ2/*, _`abc + de_`fWgWhi jklWlmno *3/,ῌ,2ῌ21/1
E-mail spsyomu@ml.a#rc.go.jp
URL http : //wwwsoc.nii.ac.jp/jssp-/
p3qr _`p3 stuvw wdx 0*1
yz +.0,*1. {| }WF F~   qrdx : *+-/*ῌ,ῌ.*3./ : {| }WF
5,F 
ehttp : //wwwsoc.nii.ac.jp/jssp-/** &<¡E-mail kibyosi@ml.a#rc.go.jp ¢£¤¥)¦§F
K++0ῌ**++ LMN¨©Pª«¬ 1­+,­+0

Journal of the Japanese Societyof
Soil Physics
November ῍ῌῌ῎

No. +*1
Contents

Foreword ῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏T. KOMAE῏ +Original Papers
Field Evaluation of Compost, Sawdust and Rice Straw Biomass on Soil Physical andHydraulic Properties ῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏M.K. EUSUFZAI, T. MAEDA and K. FUJII῏ Analysis on Hydrological Aspects of Shallow Groundwater in a Catchment with an
Agricultural Toposequence ῎ An Implication for a Risk Assessment of Excess
Nutrient Discharge to Surrounding Water Body῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏I. IIYAMA, K. MATSUMORI, H. FUJIWARA and Y. NAKAJIMA῏ +1
E#ects of Tracer Flow Velocity on Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test (PITT) for
Estimating the Volume of Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏J. NISHIWAKI, T. MIYAZAKI, M. MIZOGUCHI and T. KOMAI῏ ,1
E#ects of Imogolite Addition on Colloidal Stability of Montmorillonite and Kaolinite῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏Y.L. MA and J. KARUBE῏ -1
Test of a Groundwater Level Control Scheme for Higher Soybean Yield in Multipurpose Paddy Fields ῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏S. MURAKAMI, C. SASAKI and T. ANNAKA῏ ./Miscellaneous
On Homogeneous Packing of Dry Particles ῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏T. ANNAKA῏ /1
Special Reports
Water Flow and Solute Transport Models in Soils
Soil Water Hydraulic Functions for a Sandy Soil and an Aggregated Soil῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏M. SAKAI and N. TORIDE῏ 0Prediction of Long-term Changes in Soil Water Content and Temperature in Bare
Soils ῎ Determining Surface Boundary Conditions from Estimated Meteorological
Information ῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏H. SAITO, J. À
SIMUÕNEK and N. TORIDE῏ 13
Lectures
Reading of Classical Study Series“Analysis of the Vertical Downward Flow of Water through a Two Layered Soil”
By S. Takagi ῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏J. CHIKUSHI῏ 31
Readers’ column ῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌS. SUZUKIῌ+*1
Book review ῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌT. TSURITAῌ+*3
Announcements ῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏+++
Editor’s Postscript ῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏++0Japanese Society of Soil Physics
Department of Environmental Sciences
Faculty of Agriculture, Saga University+ Honjo-machi, Saga, 2.*ῌ2/*, Japan