STATEMENT TO
2010 REVIEW CONFERENCE OF
THE PARTIES TO THE
TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATIONOF NUCLEAR WEAPONS (NPT)New York
3 May 2010

Yukiya Amano
Director General

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

NPTFinal R e v 2_printed version.doc

Page 2Mr President, ladies and gentlemen,
The IAEA works to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons and to promote the useof nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and technical cooperation.

The IAEA also has a role toplay in verifying nuclear disarmament. As all of these activities are relevant to the work of theNPT Review Conference, I would like to provide you with a brief overview of recentdevelopments.
As you know, reliable supplies of energy are vital to ensure continued prosperity andsustained development. Nuclear power is enjoying growing acceptance as a stable and cleansource of energy that can help to mitigate the impact of climate change. More than 60 countries
are considering introducing nuclear power to generate electricity. It is expected that between 10
and 25 new countries will bring their first nuclear power plants online by 2030.
Certainly, it is for each sovereign State to decide whether or not to use nuclear power, but
die IAEA assists interested countries in establishing a reliable nuclear infrastructure. Nuclearpower must be accessible not only for developed countries but also for developing countries.
Nuclear power needs to be efficient, sustainable and profitable. Any expansion in its use must be
done safely and securely, and without increasing the proliferation risk.
In March this year, with the approval of the IAEA Board of Governors, I signed anagreement with Russia to establish a low enriched uranium reserve to help assure supplies ofnuclear fuel to Member States. Other possible assurance of supply mechanisms are underdiscussion.
Nuclear technologies provide unique tools to meet the basic needs of human beings. To
take one example, nuclear medicine and radiodierapy are very effective in the diagnosis andtreatment of cancer. The IAEA is now helping developing countries to fight cancer through our
Programme of Action for Cancer Therapy (PACT).
The application of nuclear technology in plant breeding, food irradiation, animal health andpest control is making valuable contributions to enhancing global food security. Nucleartechnology is also useful in water management and environmental monitoring.
In any use of nuclear technology, safety and security must always be ensured. While theprimary responsibility lies with Member States, the Agency has an important role to play in theseareas.

Page 3

Nuclear safety has improved considerably since the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. However,
we can never be complacent and need to remain vigilant. The TAP.A is the custodian of therelevant international safety conventions and standards and provides practical assistance toMember States. For example, IAEA peer review missions bring experts together to study
individual countries3 nuclear safety systems and make recommendations on how to remedy
possible weaknesses.
Great progress has also been made in making nuclear and radioactive materials moresecure. This has helped States to counter the risk of nuclear terrorism, which remains a real and
immediate threat to international security. The IAEA is widely recognized as the focal point forstrengthening efforts in this area. The support expressed for our work by many heads of stateand government at the recent Nuclear Security Summit in Washington was very encouraging.
The Final Document of the 2000 NPT Review Conference called for expanded use of theAgency's Technical Co-operation Programme. The programme has grown since then, and theannual resources of the Technical Cooperation programme now amount to more than $100
million. We implement projects in more than 120 countries and territories. However, more
efforts are needed to achieve sufficient, assured and predictable funding of technical cooperation.
In the 2000 Final Document, States party to the NPT recognized that IAEA safeguards area fundamental pillar of the nuclear non-proliferation regime, play an indispensable role in theimplementation of the Treaty and help to create an environment conducive to nuclear
disarmament and nuclear cooperation.
At present, the Agency is working to resolve important safeguards implementation issues inthree States.
The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) has not allowed the Agency toimplement safeguards since 2002 and, therefore, the Agency cannot draw any safeguards
conclusion for the DPRK. In April 2009, the DPRK ceased all cooperation with the IAEA in theimplementation of the ad hoc monitoring and verification arrangement pursuant to the Six-PartyTalks process.
In the case of Iran, the Agency continues to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear
material, but remains unable to confirm that all nuclear material is in peaceful activities because
Iran has not provided the necessary cooperation. I continue to request Iran to take steps towards
the full implementation of its Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement and relevant resolutions ofPage 4

the IAEA Board of Governors and the United Nations Security Council, and to clarify activities
with a possible military dimension.
As far as Syria is concerned, the Agency has not been able to make progress towards
resolving questions related to the nature of the Dair Alzour site destroyed by Israel and otherlocations. Syria has not cooperated with the Agency since June 2008 in this regard. I continue torequest Syria to engage with the Agency on all outstanding issues.
Adherence to IAEA comprehensive safeguards agreements (CSAs) and additional
protocols (APs) has been increasing, but more should be done.
At present, 20 NPT parties have still not brought comprehensive safeguards agreements
into force. I strongly encourage all remaining NPT parties to conclude and implement CSAs.
Thirty-two States have brought additional protocols into force since 2005, bringing thetotal number now in force to 98. The additional information and broader access for IAEA
inspectors provided for in the AP are essential for the IAEA to obtain a much fuller picture ofexisting and planned nuclear programmes and nuclear material holdings of States withcomprehensive safeguards agreements. The AP is of vital importance for the Agency to be able
to provide credible assurance not only that declared nuclear material is not being diverted frompeaceful uses, but also that there are no undeclared nuclear material and activities in a State. I urge
all States to bring APs into force.
Nuclear-weapon-free zones make an important contribution to achieving a nuclearweapon-free world. Since the last Review Conference, the Central Asian Nuclear Weapon-FreeZone Treaty and the African Nuclear Weapon Free Zone Treaty have entered into force.
I would like to recall that the IAEA General Conference has adopted resolutions in recentyears on the establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the Middle East. Last year's GeneralConference also adopted a resolution on Israel's nuclear capabilities. I am following up on theseresolutions as requested by die General Conference
Finally, nuclear disarmament is an area of great interest for the IAEA and the Agency has arole to play through verification activities. Progress in nuclear disarmament has a positive impact
on non-proliferation efforts and vice versa. Against this background, I welcome the new START
Treaty concluded between the Russian Federation and the United States last month as a step
forward in nuclear disarmament.

PageSMr President,
A successful NPT Review Conference is indispensable because it will enhance confidence
in the non-proliferation regime, which in turn will provide the Agency with a stronger basis for
our work in all areas.
I wish you every success in the coming weeks.