Writing Band
Descriptors

Updated May 2023
Please visit IELTS.org for updates

2

Writing Task 1
Band Descriptors

Writing Task 1 Band Descriptors

Updated May 2023

Scoring criteria for Academic and General Training tests

Please visit IELTS.org for updates
Page 1Band
Score

A script must fully fit the positive features of the descriptor at a particular level. Bolded text indicates negative features that will limit a rating.

Task Achievement

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range &Accuracy

All the requirements of the task are fully and appropriately satisfied.

The message can be followed effortlessly.

There may be extremely rare lapses in content.

Cohesion is used in such a way that it very
rarely attracts attention.

Full flexibility and precise use are evident
within the scope of the task.

A wide range of structures within the scopeof the task is used with full flexibility andcontrol.

9

Any lapses in coherence or cohesion areminimal.
Paragraphing is skilfully managed.

The response covers all the requirements of the task appropriately, relevantly
and sufficiently.

8(Academic) Key features are skilfully selected, and clearly presented,
highlighted and illustrated.
(General Training) All bullet points are clearly presented, and appropriately
illustrated or extended.

There may be occasional omissions or lapses in content.

The response covers the requirements of the task.
The content is relevant and accurate – there may be a few omissions or lapses.
The format is appropriate.

7(Academic) Key features which are selected are covered and clearlyhighlighted but could be more fully or more appropriately illustrated or
extended.
(Academic) It presents a clear overview, the data are appropriately
categorised, and main trends or differences are identified.
(General Training) All bullet points are covered and clearly highlighted but
could be more fully or more appropriately illustrated or extended. It presents
a clear purpose. The tone is consistent and appropriate to the task. Any lapses
are minimal.

The message can be followed with ease.
Information and ideas are logicallysequenced, and cohesion is well managed.
Occasional lapses in coherence or
cohesion may occur.
Paragraphing is used sufficiently andappropriately.

Information and ideas are logicallyorganised and there is a clear progression
throughout the response. A few lapses
may occur.
A range of cohesive devices includingreference and substitution is used flexibly
but with some inaccuracies or someover/under use.

A wide range of vocabulary is used accurately
and appropriately with very natural andsophisticated control of lexical features.

Punctuation and grammar are usedappropriately throughout.

Minor errors in spelling and word formation
are extremely rare and have minimal impact
on communication.

Minor errors are extremely rare and haveminimal impact on communication

A wide resource is fluently and flexibly used
to convey precise meanings within the scopeof the task.

A wide range of structures within the scopeof the task is flexibly and accurately used.

There is skilful use of uncommon and/or
idiomatic items when appropriate, despite
occasional inaccuracies in word choice andcollocation.
Occasional errors in spelling and/or word
formation may occur, but have minimal
impact on communication.

The majority of sentences are error-free, andpunctuation is well managed.
Occasional, non-systematic errors andinappropriacies occur, but have minimal
impact on communication.

The resource is sufficient to allow someflexibility and precision.

A variety of complex structures is used withsome flexibility and accuracy.

There is some ability to use less common
and/or idiomatic items.

Grammar and punctuation are generally wellcontrolled, and error-free sentences are
frequent.

An awareness of style and collocation isevident, though inappropriacies occur.
There are only a few errors in spelling and/or
word formation, and they do not detractfrom overall clarity.

A few errors in grammar may persist, butthese do not impede communication.

Writing Task 1 Band Descriptors

Updated May 2023

Scoring criteria for Academic and General Training tests

Please visit IELTS.org for updates
Page 2Band
Score

A script must fully fit the positive features of the descriptor at a particular level. Bolded text indicates negative features that will limit a rating.

Task Achievement

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range &Accuracy

The response focuses on the requirements of the task and an appropriate
format is used.

Information and ideas are generally
arranged coherently and there is a clear
overall progression.

The resource is generally adequate andappropriate for the task.

A mix of simple and complex sentence
forms is used but flexibility is limited.

The meaning is generally clear in spite of arather restricted range or a lack ofprecision in word choice.

Examples of more complex structures are
not marked by the same level of accuracy
as in simple structures.

If the writer is a risk-taker, there will be awider range of vocabulary used but higher
degrees of inaccuracy or inappropriacy.

Errors in grammar and punctuation occur,
but rarely impede communication(Academic) Key features which are selected are covered and adequately
highlighted. A relevant overview is attempted. Information is appropriately
selected and supported using figures/data.

6(General Training) All bullet points are covered and adequately
highlighted. The purpose is generally clear. There may be minor
inconsistencies in tone.
Some irrelevant, inappropriate or inaccurate information may occur inareas of detail or when illustrating or extending the main points.

Cohesive devices are used to some goodeffect but cohesion within and/or
between sentences may be faulty ormechanical due to misuse, overuse oromission.
The use of reference and substitution
may lack flexibility or clarity and result insome repetition or error

Some details may be missing (or excessive) and further extension orillustration may be needed.
The response generally addresses the requirements of the task. The
format may be inappropriate in places.
(Academic) Key features which are selected are not adequately covered.
The recounting of detail is mainly mechanical. There may be no data to
support the description.

5(General Training) All bullet points are presented but one or more may not
be adequately covered. The purpose may be unclear at times. The tone
may be variable and sometimes inappropriate.
There may be a tendency to focus on details (without referring to thebigger picture).
The inclusion of irrelevant, inappropriate or inaccurate material in key
areas detracts from the task achievement.
There is limited detail when extending and illustrating the main points.

Organisation is evident but is not wholly
logical and there may be a lack of overall
progression. Nevertheless, there is asense of underlying coherence to the
response.
The relationship of ideas can be followed
but the sentences are not fluently linked
to each other.
There may be limited/overuse of cohesive
devices with some inaccuracy.
The writing may be repetitive due toinadequate and/or inaccurate use ofreference and substitution.

There are some errors in spelling and/or
word formation, but these do not impede
communication.

The resource is limited but minimallyadequate for the task.

The range of structures is limited andrather repetitive.

Simple vocabulary may be used accurately
but the range does not permit muchvariation in expression.

Although complex sentences areattempted, they tend to be faulty, and thegreatest accuracy is achieved on simple
sentences.

There may be frequent lapses in
the appropriacy of word choice, and a lackof flexibility is apparent in frequent
simplifications and/or repetitions.
Errors in spelling and/or word formation
may be noticeable and may cause somedifficulty for the reader.

Grammatical errors may be frequent andcause some difficulty for the reader.
Punctuation may be faulty.

Writing Task 1 Band Descriptors

Updated May 2023

Scoring criteria for Academic and General Training tests

Please visit IELTS.org for updates
Page 3Band
Score

A script must fully fit the positive features of the descriptor at a particular level. Bolded text indicates negative features that will limit a rating.

Task Achievement

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range &Accuracy

The response is an attempt to address the task.

Information and ideas are evident but notarranged coherently, and there is no clear
progression within the response.

The resource is limited and inadequate foror unrelated to the task. Vocabulary is basic andmay be used repetitively.

A very limited range of structures is
used.

Relationships between ideas can be unclear
and/or inadequately marked. There is someuse of basic cohesive devices, which may beinaccurate or repetitive.

There may be inappropriate use of lexical chunks(e.g. memorised phrases, formulaic language
and/or language from the input material).

(Academic) Few key features have been selected.
(General Training) Not all bullet points are presented.

4(General Training) The purpose of the letter is not clearly explained and may
be confused. The tone may be inappropriate.
The format may be inappropriate.

Key features/bullet points which are presented may be irrelevant, repetitive,
inaccurate or inappropriate.
The response does not address the requirements of the task (possibly becauseof misunderstanding of the data/diagram/situation).

3

Key features/bullet points which are presented may be largely irrelevant.
Limited information is presented, and this may be used repetitively.

The content barely relates to the task.

2

There is inaccurate use or a lack of
substitution or referencing.

There is no apparent logical organisation.
Ideas are discernible but difficult to relate
to each other.
Minimal use of sequencers or cohesive
devices. Those used do not necessarily
indicate a logical relationship between
ideas.
There is difficulty in identifying referencing.
There is little relevant message, or theentire response may be off-topic.
There is little evidence of control oforganisational features.

Responses of 20 words or fewer are rated at Band 1.

Responses of 20 words or fewer are
rated at Band 1.

Inappropriate word choice and/or errors in word
formation and/or in spelling may impede
meaning.

The resource is inadequate (which may be due tothe response being significantly underlength).
Possible over-dependence on input material ormemorised language.
Control of word choice and/or spelling is very
limited, and errors predominate. These errors may
severely impede meaning.
The resource is extremely limited with few
recognisable strings, apart from memorised
phrases.
There is no apparent control of word formation
and/or spelling.
Responses of 20 words or fewer are rated at
Band 1.

Subordinate clauses are rare andsimple sentences predominate.
Some structures are produced accurately
but grammatical errors are frequent andmay impede meaning.
Punctuation is often faulty or inadequate.

Sentence forms are attempted, buterrors in grammar and punctuation
predominate (except in memorised
phrases or those taken from the input
material). This prevents most meaningfrom coming through.

Length may be insufficient to provide
evidence of control of sentence forms.
There is little or no evidence of sentence
forms (except in memorised phrases).

Responses of 20 words or fewer are
rated at Band 1.

1

The content is wholly unrelated to the task.

0Should only be used where a candidate did not attend or attempt the question in any way, used a language other than English throughout, or where there is proof that a candidate’s answer has been totallymemorised.

Any copied rubric must be discounted.

The writing fails to communicate any
message and appears to be by a virtual
non-writer.

No resource is apparent, except for a few isolated
words.

No rateable language is evident.

6

Writing Task 2Band Descriptors

Writing Task 2 Band Descriptors

Updated May 2023

Scoring criteria for Academic and General Training tests

Please visit IELTS.org for updates
Page 1Band
Score

A script must fully fit the positive features of the descriptor at a particular level. Bolded text indicates negative features that will limit a rating.

9

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range &Accuracy

The prompt is appropriately addressed and explored in depth.

The message can be followed effortlessly.

A clear and fully developed position is presented which directly
answers the question/s.

Cohesion is used in such a way that it very
rarely attracts attention.

Full flexibility and precise use are widely
evident.

A wide range of structures is used with full
flexibility and control.

Ideas are relevant, fully extended and well supported.

Any lapses in coherence or cohesion areminimal.

A wide range of vocabulary is usedaccurately and appropriately with very
natural and sophisticated control of lexicalfeatures.

Punctuation and grammar are usedappropriately throughout.

Any lapses in content or support are extremely rare.

8

The prompt is appropriately and sufficiently addressed.

The message can be followed with ease.

A clear and well-developed position is presented in response to thequestion/s.

Information and ideas are logically sequenced,
and cohesion is well managed.

Ideas are relevant, well extended and supported.

Occasional lapses in coherence and cohesion
may occur.

There may be occasional omissions or lapses in content.

The main parts of the prompt are appropriately addressed.
A clear and developed position is presented.

7Paragraphing is skilfully managed.

Main ideas are extended and supported but there may be atendency to over-generalise or there may be a lack of focus andprecision in supporting ideas/material.

Paragraphing is used sufficiently andappropriately.
Information and ideas are logically organised,
and there is a clear progression throughout
the response. (A few lapses may occur, butthese are minor.)A range of cohesive devices includingreference and substitution is used flexibly butwith some inaccuracies or some over/underuse.
Paragraphing is generally used effectively tosupport overall coherence, and the sequencingof ideas within a paragraph is generally logical.

Minor errors in spelling and word
formation are extremely rare and haveminimal impact on communication.
A wide resource is fluently and flexibly
used to convey precise meanings.
There is skilful use of uncommon and/or
idiomatic items when appropriate, despite
occasional inaccuracies in word choice andcollocation.

Occasional errors in spelling and/or word
formation may occur, but have minimal
impact on communication.
The resource is sufficient to allow someflexibility and precision.
There is some ability to use less common
and/or idiomatic items.
An awareness of style and collocation isevident, though inappropriacies occur.
There are only a few errors in spelling
and/or word formation and they do not
detract from overall clarity.

Minor errors are extremely rare and haveminimal impact on communication.

A wide range of structures is flexibly andaccurately used.
The majority of sentences are error-free,and punctuation is well managed.
Occasional, non-systematic errors andinappropriacies occur, but have minimal
impact on communication.
A variety of complex structures is usedwith some flexibility and accuracy.
Grammar and punctuation are generally
well controlled, and error-free sentences
are frequent.
A few errors in grammar may persist, butthese do not impede communication.

Writing Task 2 Band Descriptors

Updated May 2023

Scoring criteria for Academic and General Training tests

Please visit IELTS.org for updates
Page 2Band
Score

A script must fully fit the positive features of the descriptor at a particular level. Bolded text indicates negative features that will limit a rating.

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range &Accuracy

The main parts of the prompt are addressed (though some may be
more fully covered than others). An appropriate format is used.

Information and ideas are generally arranged
coherently and there is a clear overall
progression.

The resource is generally adequate andappropriate for the task.

A mix of simple and complex sentence
forms is used but flexibility is limited.

The meaning is generally clear in spite of arather restricted range or a lack ofprecision in word choice.

Examples of more complex structures are
not marked by the same level of accuracy
as in simple structures.

If the writer is a risk-taker, there will be awider range of vocabulary used but higher
degrees of inaccuracy or inappropriacy.

Errors in grammar and punctuation occur,
but rarely impede communication.

A position is presented that is directly relevant to the prompt,
although the conclusions drawn may be unclear, unjustified or
repetitive.

6

Main ideas are relevant, but some may be insufficiently developed
or may lack clarity, while some supporting arguments and evidence
may be less relevant or inadequate.

Cohesive devices are used to some good effectbut cohesion within and/or between sentences
may be faulty or mechanical due to misuse,overuse or omission.

The use of reference and substitution may lackflexibility or clarity and result in some
repetition or error.
Paragraphing may not always be logical and/or
the central topic may not always be clear.

The main parts of the prompt are incompletely addressed. The
format may be inappropriate in places.
The writer expresses a position, but the development is not always
clear.

5

Some main ideas are put forward, but they are limited and are notsufficiently developed and/or there may be irrelevant detail.
There may be some repetition.

Organisation is evident but is not wholly logicaland there may be a lack of overall progression.
Nevertheless, there is a sense of underlying
coherence to the response.
The relationship of ideas can be followed but
the sentences are not fluently linked to eachother.

There are some errors in spelling and/or
word formation, but these do not impede
communication.

The resource is limited but minimallyadequate for the task.

The range of structures is limited andrather repetitive.

Simple vocabulary may be used accurately
but the range does not permit muchvariation in expression.

Although complex sentences areattempted, they tend to be faulty, and thegreatest accuracy is achieved on simple
sentences.

There may be limited/overuse of cohesive
devices with some inaccuracy.

There may be frequent lapses in theappropriacy of word choice and a lack offlexibility is apparent in frequent
simplifications and/or repetitions.

The writing may be repetitive due toinadequate and/or inaccurate use of reference
and substitution.

Errors in spelling and/or word formation
may be noticeable and may cause somedifficulty for the reader.

Paragraphing may be inadequate or
missing.

Grammatical errors may be frequent andcause some difficulty for the reader.
Punctuation may be faulty.

Writing Task 2 Band Descriptors

Updated May 2023

Scoring criteria for Academic and General Training tests

Please visit IELTS.org for updates
Page 3Band
Score

A script must fully fit the positive features of the descriptor at a particular level. Bolded text indicates negative features that will limit a rating.

4

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range &Accuracy

The prompt is tackled in a minimal way, or the answer istangential, possibly due to some misunderstanding of
the prompt. The format may be inappropriate.

Information and ideas are evident but not arranged
coherently and there is no clear progression within the
response.

The resource is limited and inadequate foror unrelated to the task. Vocabulary isbasic and may be used repetitively.

A very limited range of structures isused.

A position is discernible, but the reader has to read
carefully to find it.

Relationships between ideas can be unclear and/or
inadequately marked. There is some use of basic cohesive
devices, which may be inaccurate or repetitive.

There may be inappropriate use of lexical
chunks (e.g. memorised phrases, formulaic
language and/or language from the input
material).

Main ideas are difficult to identify and such ideas thatare identifiable may lack relevance, clarity and/or
support.

Large parts of the response may be repetitive.
No part of the prompt is adequately addressed, or the
prompt has been misunderstood.

3

No relevant position can be identified, and/or there islittle direct response to the question/s.
There are few ideas, and these may be irrelevant or
insufficiently developed.
The content is barely related to the prompt.

210No position can be identified.
There may be glimpses of one or two ideas without
development.
Responses of 20 words or fewer are rated at Band 1.
The content is wholly unrelated to the prompt.

There is inaccurate use or a lack of substitution orreferencing.

There may be no paragraphing and/or no clear main topic
within paragraphs.
There is no apparent logical organisation. Ideas are
discernible but difficult to relate to each other.
There is minimal use of sequencers or cohesive devices.
Those used do not necessarily indicate a logical relationshipbetween ideas.

There is difficulty in identifying referencing.
Any attempts at paragraphing are unhelpful.
There is little relevant message, or the entire response may
be off-topic.

There is little evidence of control of organisational features.
Responses of 20 words or fewer are rated at Band 1.
The writing fails to communicate any message and appears
to be by a virtual non-writer.

Inappropriate word choice and/or errors inword formation and/or in spelling
may impede meaning.
The resource is inadequate (which may be
due to the response being significantly
underlength). Possible over-dependence on
input material or memorised language.
Control of word choice and/or spelling isvery limited, and errors predominate. Theseerrors may severely impede meaning.

Subordinate clauses are rare andsimple sentences predominate.

Some structures are produced
accurately but grammatical errors are
frequent and may impede meaning.
Punctuation is often faulty or
inadequate.
Sentence forms are attempted, buterrors in grammar and punctuation
predominate (except in memorised
phrases or those taken from the input
material). This prevents most meaningfrom coming through.

The resource is extremely limited with few
recognisable strings, apart from memorised
phrases.

Length may be insufficient toprovide evidence of control ofsentence forms.
There is little or no evidence ofsentence forms (except in memorised
phrases).

There is no apparent control of word
formation and/or spelling.
Responses of 20 words or fewer are rated
at Band 1.

Responses of 20 words or fewer are
rated at Band 1.

No resource is apparent, except for a few
No rateable language is evident.
isolated words.
Any copied rubric must be discounted.
Should only be used where a candidate did not attend or attempt the question in any way, used a language other than English throughout, or where there is proof that a candidate’s answer has been totallymemorised.