2012 Entrance Exam for Graduate School
平成 24 年度 大学院博士 (前期) 課程入学者選抜学力試験

English 英語100 点Notices 注意事項
1. Do not open this exam until you are given instructions to begin. 試験開始の合図があるまで，この問題冊子を開かないでください．

2. Answer sheets are separated from the question sheets (Questions are on pages
1-6). Please submit only the answer sheets. 問題冊子 (問題は 1∼6 ページにあります) と解答用紙 (2 枚) は別々になっています．解答冊子のみを提出してください．

3. Do not forget to write your name and your applicant number on all of youranswer sheets and cover sheet. 解答冊子の表紙と各解答用紙の所定欄に，忘れずに氏名と受験番号をはっきりと記入してください．

4. The questions are written in English and/or Japanese. Please read the instructions carefully. 問題文は英語か日本語で書かれています．指示を注意深く読んでください．

5. If you ﬁnd some incomplete printing or collating, please let the supervisor know
by raising your hand silently. 問題冊子の印刷不明瞭やページの落丁・乱丁あるいは解答用紙の汚れ等に気がついた場合は，静かに手を上げて監督員に知らせてください．

6. Please take the question sheets with you after ﬁnishing the exam. 試験終了後，問題冊子は持ち帰ってください．

7. Scores are indicated for each of the questions. 設問ごとに配点が記されています．

8. You have 90 minutes. 試験時間は 90 分です．

PART 1: Reading Comprehension(40 points)

Read the article below and answer the following questions.
One goal of most modern societies is to equip citizens with the requisite skills andproﬁciencies that enable them to participate in the global economy. How well this isachieved depends much upon the educational system a society adopts. Are nationalyardsticks, or achievement measurements, suﬃcient indicators for determining whether
the goals have been attained? Indeed, national measures are necessary, but some global
indicator is also required if countries want to participate in the global economy.
Every three years the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) administered by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
provides one such indicator. PISA assesses the extent to which school students haveacquired the knowledge and skills that are essential for full participation in modernsocieties. PISA has generally focused on reading, mathematics and science literacy.
PISA does not merely assesses whether students can reproduce knowledge, such as foran exam, but also examines how well students can extrapolate from what they havelearned and apply it in unfamiliar settings.
In Japan, approximately 3,400 junior high and high school students from 109 schools
participated in the PISA 2009 survey. Overall, Japan ranked 7th behind regional
neighbors Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand. Japan scored highly (520points) and ranked seventh with text-based literacy, ranked eighth in mathematics (529points), and ranked fourth in science (539 points).
Moreover, technological literacy has also become a recognized proﬁciency for themodern student. PISA also assesses this literacy. Computer use worldwide has been
growing at an exponential rate. By mid-2010, it was estimated that almost two billion
people, or 29% of the world population, were using the Internet, with percentages
ranging from 77% in North America to about 11% in Africa (Miniwatts MarketingGroup, 2010). In 2010, amongst the OECD countries, on average around 25% of thepopulation had a ﬁxed-line broadband (OECD Broadband Portal) compared to around
8% of the global population. Mobile broadband connection was estimated at 14% (ITUStatistics).
It was once thought that those people who had been exposed to Information andCommunication Technology (ICT) from a young age, so-called “digital natives”, readily— 1 —possessed the skills and abilities required to make use of digital devices, compared toolder people, the so-called “digital immigrants” (Prensky, 2001). However, there is noevidence to support this hypothesis, as mere exposure to technology is not suﬃcient forbecoming a proﬁcient user.
The results from PISA 2009 highlight this succinctly within the Japanese environment.
Japan ranked 4th on digital reading proﬁciency (See Table VI.A), even though the results
for computer-use at home and at school were mediocre. This means that students could
read and extrapolate information from a digital text in a similar way as they may whenreading a print-based text. Korea was the top performing country, followed by New
Zealand and Australia.
Although ICT can support and enhance learning, access to computers and the Internet, and how they are used, are also essential requisites for developing technologicalliteracy. In Denmark, Australia and Norway, more than 70% of students reported thatthey frequently do homework on a home computer. More than 60% reported that theybrowse the Internet for schoolwork on their home computer. In contrast, fewer than 10%of students in Japan do either of these tasks frequently. Students in Japan rarely use
home computers for schoolwork, and fewer than 5% of Japanese students use computersin their classes at all. Similar results were forthcoming for the ability of students inJapan to use computers for creating a presentation, or using a spreadsheet to plot agraph. Japan was ranked the lowest in the OECD.
The PISA 2009 results highlight that Japan is adequately providing an educational
system that enables students to acquire the traditional literacies (reading, math andscience). However, questions need to be levied against the system’s shortcomings inequipping students with digital literacy, an essential component if the youth are to takeadvantage of the opportunities provided in the globalized economy. Whether the youth
choose to use technologies in their future is irrelevant: if they cannot, they are alreadyhindered and will forever be playing catch-up.

— 2 —Table VI.A: An Overview of Performance in Digital Reading, Navigation
and Computer Use.

References
Miniwatts Marketing Group (2010). Internet World Stats: Usage and Population Statistics.
Retrieved September 21, 2010, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
OECD (2011). OECD Broadband Portal. Retrieved January 26, 2012, fromhttp://www.oecd.org/sti/ict/broadband
International Telecommunications Union (2011). World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators
Database. Retrieved January 26, 2012, from http://www.itu.int/ict/statistics
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (n.d.). PISA 2009 results. Retrieved
December 22, 2011, from http://oecd.org/edu/pisa/2009Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, Vol. 9, No. 5.
Retrieved January 27, 2011, from http://www.marcprensky.com— 3 —Reading Comprehension Questions
記事に書かれている内容にもとづいて，以下の各問いに答えなさい．

Based on the information provided in the above article, answer the followingquestions.

1.

Based on the text, mark either True (○) or False (×) for the following
statements.

(25 points)(ア) National tests are important assessment measures.
(イ) Japan’s literacy ranking in mathematics was higher than science but lower
than text-based literacy.
(ウ) People exposed to technology from a young age are more proﬁcient users
of digital devices than those who are not exposed early in life.
(エ) Japanese students are able to read digital texts well compared to mostother OECD countries.
(オ) The Japanese educational system adequately provides all the literacy
skills needed to use the opportunities available in the global economy.
In order of rank achieved for each literacy (text-based literacy, science literacy2.

and mathematics literacy) which of the below is the correct order for Japan?
(5 points)(ア) text-based literacy, science literacy, mathematics literacy(イ) text-based literacy, mathematics literacy, science literacy(ウ) science literacy, text-based literacy, mathematics literacy(エ) science literacy, mathematics literacy, text-based literacy(オ) cannot determine from the data provided in the text

— 4 —

3.

What was the average global ﬁxed line broadband connection percentage in2010?

(5 points)(ア) 77%(イ) 14%(ウ) 11%(エ) 8%(オ) not statedWith reference to Table VI.A, what is the percentage point diﬀerence between
4.

the OECD average and Japan for the students who use a computer at school?
(5 points)(ア) 15.3%(イ) 14.9%(ウ) 16.4%(エ) 20.0%(オ) unable to determine from the data given in the table— 5 —PART 2: Academic Skills(60 points)

Using Figure VI.5.30 and based on the data in the essay above, analyze the technological proﬁciency of students in Japan and explain its signiﬁcance for Japan’s futures.
Write around 200 words.

(60 points)

Figure VI.5.30: Percentage of students who reported being able to do thefollowing tasks very well by themselves or with the help from someone, in2003 and 2009.

— 6 —