Part 1

Bitcoin:A Novel Economic Institution
Published: September 3, 2020

Author: Yassine Elmandjra, Analyst at ARK Invest
Authored in collaboration with Coin Metrics

Join the conversation on Twitter @ARKinvest

www.ark-invest.com

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

CONTENTSI.

The Evolution of Economic Organization

3

II.

The Financial System Has Evolved to Rely On “Trust-Based” Institutions

4

III.

The Trust Based Model Falls Short

5

Value should be exchanged globally and freely

5

Wealth should be owned wholly and protected

6

Rules should be enforced reliably and predictably

8

Integrity of the system should be verifiable9

Bitcoin: A Financial Institution Eliminating the Need for a Trust-Based Model

10
11

IV.

What is Bitcoin?

V.

Bitcoin Is Designed to Satisfy the Four Economic Assurances

Bitcoin embeds native verification tools

12
12
14
15
17

Bitcoin As An Investment

18

Bitcoin users can send any amount of value anytime to anyone anywhere
Bitcoin has an embedded property system
Bitcoin incorporates a unique system of checks and balances to enforce rules

VI.

2Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

Abstract
This paper lays out the case for Bitcoin. In Part 1, we describe how the Information Age gave rise to
Bitcoin, a novel economic institution designed to challenge legacy financial systems. We explain
how legacy financial institutions, which have evolved through a trust-based model, appear to havefallen short of the four economic assurances necessary for a predictable financial system.
We then analyze Bitcoin’s behavior in relation to these four economic assurances and explain why
we believe it is designed uniquely to satisfy them.
After explaining the merits of Bitcoin as a novel institution in Part 1, we assess the investment meritsof bitcoin as a monetary asset in Part 2. While many investors question its merit as an investment,
we believe that bitcoin is the most compelling monetary asset to emerge since gold. We begin our
analysis by detailing the evolution of bitcoin’s price and sizing its potential market opportunity overthe next five years. We then examine bitcoin’s correlation of returns relative to traditional asset
classes, making the case for a strategic allocation. Finally, we assess the maturity of bitcoin in themarketplace and conclude with thoughts on its allocation in a well-diversified portfolio.

I. The Evolution of Economic Organization
Advancements in civilization have led to increasingly complex modes of economic organization.1
In hunter-gatherer society, humans lived in small groups and relied predominantly on face to faceinteractions. They established communities in rural areas, with economic production limited tomanual human labor. In the transition to agriculture, humans began interacting in larger groups
and adopting new forms of social organization to scale interactions. They formed towns andcities, with resource-rich regions the centers of trade and commerce. As manufacturing processes
advanced, an era of industrialization emerged. Productivity increased as workers flocked tofactories, and tasks that previously required months could be completed in days. Today, the focusof the economy has shifted from traditional industries developed through industrialization, toindustries enabled by information technology. Economic activity has migrated from the physicalto the digital world, with power granted to those in charge of storing and distributing information.2
As groups grow and become more complex, institutions evolve to scale interactions, governing
the behavior with a system of rules intended to facilitate coordination. Marriage, markets,
governments, banking, laws, and firms are examples of institutions that have emerged over thecourse of human history.
1
2

Currie, Thomas, et al. Evolution of Institutions and Organizations. University of Michigan, www-personal.umich.edu/~jbednar/WIP/
Strungmann.joint.pdf.
Currie, Thomas, et al. Evolution of Institutions and Organizations. University of Michigan, www-personal.umich.edu/~jbednar/WIP/
Strungmann.joint.pdf.

3

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

The advancement of technology during The Information Age has given rise to novel institutions.
Digital logic, transistors, and integrated circuit chips have created powerful tools, from computers
and microprocessors to cell phones and the Internet, enabling participation in institutions at
unprecedented scale. Social media networks have transformed the way we communicate andinteract. Online marketplaces have led to widespread, instant commercial matchmaking. Digital
media platforms allow the streaming of content libraries consumed on-demand.
Perhaps the most notable institution to rise from the creation of these tools, Bitcoin has called
into question the very basis of economic organization. In 2009, the Internet birthed Bitcoin,a novel economic institution giving individuals the ability to participate in a politically neutral
realm of economic activity. Its coordination transcends borders, locations and jurisdiction.
Instead of relying on centralized intermediaries to enforce its rules, Bitcoin relies on a distributed
network of computers. This architecture enables it not only to function outside the purview oflegacy systems, but also to challenge them. While the full ramifications of Bitcoin’s creation are
not well understood, we believe that it will contribute more dramatically and profoundly to theevolution of monetary and financial systems than any other breakthrough in history.

II. The Financial System Has Evolved to Rely On “Trust-Based” Institutions“Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving
as trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enoughfor most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust-based model.”- Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin whitepaper3

The promise of Bitcoin is best understood in relation to traditional financial systems, which rely on
centrally controlled institutions that enforce the rules, record-keeping, and adjudication of the system.
These institutions were created to standardize the exchange of value, manage wealth, and facilitate
economic activity. Central banks, for example, govern monetary policy, while commercial banks
custody and manage assets, and centralized payment processors mediate consumer transactions.
Under a “trust-based” model, the integrity of an institution is a function of those controlling theinstitution. Rules enforced from the top down are guaranteed if those in control are trustworthy.
Institutional decision-making typically is opaque and unpredictable. Rule changes are at thediscretion of those in control, sometimes creating a misalignment of incentives between theinstitution and its participants. As institutions grow in importance, the entities controlling themaccumulate more power, potentially exposing participants to harmful behavior.

3

Nakamoto, Satoshi. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

4

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

As we will explore, financial systems founded on a trust-based model fail to provide predictableeconomic assurances. Specifically, under a financial system:
1.
2
3.
4.

Value should be exchanged globally and freely.
Wealth should be owned wholly and protected.
Rules should be enforced reliably and predictably.
Integrity of the system should be verifiable.

In the next section, we will detail our view on how trust-based institutions fall short of satisfying
these economic assurances.

III. The Trust Based Model Falls Short
Assurance 1: Value should be exchanged globally and freely.
Why we believe the trust-based model fails to meet Assurance 1:
Centralized parties determine the eligibility of participants and control the flow of capital.
Today, financial institutions rely on centralized authorities to control the flow of transactions anddetermine the eligibility of participants. While controlling flows of capital can protect the financial
system from malicious activity, who defines malicious activity? If one transaction can be censoredand controlled, can’t all transactions be censored and controlled? Can’t the powers-that-be deprive
participants of the ability to exchange value globally and freely?
At both the private and nation-state levels, financial institutions exert varying degrees of control.
At the private level, payment processors like PayPal can and do censor users, often throwing themoff their platforms without explanation.4 In some cases, governments pressure private companies
to do so.5 Because these companies must abide by local laws, they can face limits to serving users
on a global basis, leading to a highly fragmented global financial infrastructure.
At the nation-state level, governments sometimes impose restrictions on the free movement of
capital. Specifically, a monetary authority choosing to fix exchange rates and control the money
supply cannot accommodate the free flow of capital.6 Such restrictions not only limit a citizen’s
ability to move anything of value freely and globally, but also create economic distortions.

4
5
6

Sollazzo, Giuseppe. “PayPal Closed My Account with No Explanation. It Could Happen to You.” Medium, Medium, 6 May 2019, medium.com/@
puntofisso/paypal-closed-my-account-with-no-explanation-it-could-happen-to-you-6ff0ba4ea95f.
Poulsen, Kevin. “PayPal Freezes WikiLeaks Account.” Wired, Conde Nast, 4 June 2017, www.wired.com/2010/12/paypal-wikileaks/.
“Ex-Chinese Central Bank Adviser Denied US Dollar Exchange Due to Age.” South China Morning Post, 31 May 2019, www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3012312/chinas-capital-outflow-controls-have-gone-extreme-former.

5Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

Instead of subjecting local banks and markets to competitive pressures, governments can force
their citizens to misallocate capital, curbing productivity, investment efficiency, and economic
growth. In the long run, institutions risk making decisions favoring those in control at the expenseof customers, users, or citizens. During the last 10 to 15 years, countries have been increasing
capital controls rather than decreasing them. Since 2007, the share of countries increasing capital
controls has soared 300% to 15%, while the share of countries reducing them has dropped 60% to
5%, as shown below.
Figure 1: The Evolution Of Changes In Capital Controls Since the 1980s
Raise

Reduce30

Percentage Share of Countries

25

20

15

10

5

0
1985

1995

2005

Source: ARK Investment Management, 2020; Data sourced from the European Central Bank,
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/ pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1415.pdf

Assurance 2: Wealth should be protected and owned wholly.
Why we believe the trust-based model fails to meet Assurance 2:
Participants rely on a local enforcer to grant property rights and protect property.
An important indicator of economic prosperity is the protection of property rights.7 A wellestablished private property system gives individuals exclusive control over their wealth and theright to use their resources as they see fit.8 Incentives to work, save, and invest lead to a more
efficient allocation of resources and greater economic output.

7
8

O’Driscoll, Gerald P., and Lee Hoskins. “Property Rights: The Key to Economic Development.” Policy Analysis, 7 Aug. 2003, www.cato.org/sites/
cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa482.pdf. medium.com/@hasufly/bitcoin-and-the-promise-of-independent-property-rights-8f10e5c7efa8.
Hasu. “Bitcoin and the Promise of Independent Property Rights.” Medium, Medium, 9 Jan. 2019, medium.com/@hasufly/bitcoin-and-thepromise-of-independent-property-rights-8f10e5c7efa8.

6

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

In a trust-based model, the protection of assets depends largely on the existence and reliability of
local protection, typically the government. In the absence of reliable local protection, individuals
often have been unable to protect their wealth. In 1933, for example, the United States banned theprivate ownership of gold, including coins, bullion, and gold certificates,9 a ban that persisted formore than 40 years. In 2016, the Government of India announced the demonetization of all₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes, which many critics considered confiscation of property without due
process.10 Then, in late 2019, the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) seized thefunds of individuals affiliated with the Hong Kong protests,11 highlighting once again that centrally
controlled wealth is guaranteed only if institutions are willing to protect it.
Subject to weak and unpredictable property rights, citizens must rely on the protection inherent
in the properties themselves. Assets protected in the absence of authority are “deep”, while those
protected by authorities are “shallow”,12 as shown below. Today, institutions controlled centrally
typically protect assets but present various tradeoffs. Immovable and impossible to hide, physicalassets like real estate are vulnerable to weak local enforcement because they can be seized
more easily than cash. Unlike cash, however, real estate cannot be demonetized. Likewise, local
bank managers can freeze bank accounts but cannot seize gold bars stored under mattresses.
Conversely, criminals can break into houses and steal gold bars but cannot freeze bank accounts.

Figure 2: Asset Protection Spectrum

DigitalCash
Shallow Protection:
Protection is derived
from authority.

PhysicalCash

Real
EstateGold

Deep Protection:
Protection can be derived in
the absence of authority.

Source: ARK Investment Management, 2020, Coin Metrics

9
10
11
12

“CY19 May Journal.” Crypto Words, 31 May 2019, cryptowords.github.io/cy19m5.
“India’s History with Demonetisation: From 1946 to 2016.” Free Press Journal, www.freepressjournal.in/cmcm/indias-history-withdemonetisation-from-1946-to-2016.
France-Presse, Agence. “Hong Kong Police Seize $10m in Donations Intended for Protesters.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 20
Dec. 2019, www.theguardian.com/world/2019/dec/20/hong-kong-police-seize-10m-in-donations-intended-for-protesters.
Nick Szabo. “Shallow Safety vs. Deep Safety.” Twitter, Twitter, 17 Aug. 2019, twitter.com/nickszabo4/status/1162743096821469184?lang=en.

7

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

Assurance 3: Rules should be enforced reliably and predictably.
Why we believe the trust-based model fails to meet Assurance 3:
Centrally controlled institutions can enforce and change rules arbitrarily.
Because they enforce rules in unpredictable ways, centrally controlled institutions can endanger asystem’s integrity. Central banks exemplify the problems associated with unilateral and unreliable
rule changes. In the 18th century, the widespread adoption of fiat currencies imbued monetary
authorities with the ability to control their money supplies. Introduced as an alternative tocommodity-based money, fiat money was and is issued by the state, backed exclusively by the full
faith and credit of issuing governments.13
Monetary authorities typically manipulate the supply of money to smooth business cycles,
ensure price stability, and/or minimize unemployment. Through open market operations, theyswap financial assets, typically short-term government debt, for central bank deposits. Seeking
to increase the supply of money, they can purchase government debt which lowers interest rates,
increasing the liquidity and lending ability of commercial banks.
As short-term interest rates approach zero, central banks can choose more unconventional policies
like quantitative easing, purchasing financial assets other than government bonds to expand themoney supply. In 2000, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) began an aggressive quantitative easing program
to curb deflation,14 adding private debt and stocks to its purchase of Japanese government bonds.
Since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2008, unconventional policies similar to those in Japan haveproliferated around the world, with no restrictions on the amount of money printed.
In the face of unpredictable changes in monetary policy, individuals typically have to grapple
with the fallout. If a central bank mismanages its country’s money supply, fiat money canlose its purchasing power to inflation, if not hyperinflation. Since the advent of fiat currency,
hyperinflation has destroyed purchasing power 29 times,15 often with a cascading impact on
weaker monetary regimes. In the last century, three monetary policy changes cascaded, cutting
the purchasing power of almost half of the world’s currencies by 50%: the creation of the Federal
Reserve in 1913 and Europe’s decision to abandon the gold standard in 1918, the US shift from thegold standard to the gold-exchange standard in 1933, and US abandonment of the gold exchange
standard in 1971., as shown below. Could the Fed’s recent response to the coronavirus pandemic
have similar consequences?

13
14
15

Chen, James. “Fiat Money.” Investopedia, Investopedia, 15 Aug. 2020, www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fiatmoney.asp.
Ross, Sean. “Japan’s Expansionist Policies Have Brought Unexpected Results.” Investopedia, Investopedia, 29 Jan. 2020, www.investopedia.
com/articles/markets/052516/japans-case-study-diminished-effects-qe.asp.
Johnston, Matthew. “Worst Cases of Hyperinflation in History.” Investopedia, Investopedia, 21 May 2020, www.investopedia.com/articles/
personal-finance/122915/worst-hyperinflations-history.asp.

8

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

Figure 3: Share of Countries Whose Domestic Currency Lost More than Half of
Its Purchasing Power Over a 5-Year Period
50%Completeabandonmentof gold
standard

45%

Percent Share of Countries

40%
35%
30%
25%

Enactment of theGold Reserve Act

20%
15%

Creation of The
Federal Reserve

10%
5%
0%

1804

1819

1834

1849

1864

1879

1894

1909

1924

1939

1954

1969

1984

1999

2014

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2020; Data sourced from Carmen and Rogoff: This Time is Different

Assurance 4: Integrity of the system should be verifiable.
Why we believe the trust-based model fails to meet Assurance 4:Centrally controlled institutions lack transparency and auditability.
A monetary system that cannot be verified is unlikely to meet the first three economic assurances.
Little transparency suggests that institutions have no incentive to be accountable. In a more consumer
friendly regime, participants would be able to audit and verify the integrity of the monetary system,
evaluating whether or not the enforcement of assurances is consistent and objective.
Highlighting the importance of verification was the lack of transparency associated withcommercial bank capital requirements leading up to the GFC in 2007-2008. Banks were
undercapitalized to such an extent that auditors could not verify enough capital to cover the risksof default.16 Unable to audit them, investors and customers had to rely instead on third parties
during one of the worst financial crises of the modern era.
Commercial banks must maintain cash reserves against customer deposits,17 determining not
only their ability to create credit but also the customer funds they put at risk. While they havethe legal obligation to return deposits on demand, banks may not be equipped to do so: no bank
16
17

Blattner, Laura, et al. “When Losses Turn Into Loans: The Cost of Undercapitalized Banks.” ECB Working Paper Series, European Central Bank,
2019, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp2228~6fb5146f92.en.pdf.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/reservereq.htm.

9Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

has enough reserves to satisfy the withdrawal of all deposits at once. Moreover, in the US today
the minimum reserve requirement for deposit institutions is zero.18 Indeed, since 1995 the averagebank reserve requirement globally has dropped by nearly 80%, as shown below.
Figure 4: Global Average Reserve Requirement Ratio

Global Average Reserve Requirement Ratio

20%
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
1994

1998

2002

2006

2010

2014

2018

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2020, CEIC

IV. Bitcoin: A Financial Institution Eliminating The Need
For A Trust-Based Model
To a significant degree, the financial system’s weakness today is a function of a trust-basedmodel controlled by centralized institutions. Human bias and error exposes participants tomismanagement, creating an unpredictable environment for economic activity.
Enter the Information Age and a new economic order unleashed by computer science andcryptography. During the Global Financial Crisis in 2009, the Internet birthed Bitcoin, a financial
system without a centralized authority.
Bitcoin fundamentally shifts how a financial system distributes trust, eliminating the roles ofseveral institutions that rely on centralized authorities and creating an ecosystem based oncomputer science and cryptography. In contrast to a central bank that controls monetary policy,
or a commercial bank that controls the custody of assets, or a payment processor that controls
18Chen, James. “Reserve Requirements.” Investopedia, 27 May 2020, www.investopedia.com/terms/r/requiredreserves.asp#:~:text=Reserve%20
Requirement%20Thresholds&text=As%20of%20Jan.,a%20reserve%20requirement%20of%2010%25.

10Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

consumer transactions, the Bitcoin network and all of its participants oversee all such functions, as
shown below.
Figure 5: Financial System
Trust-Based Financial System

Economic Function

Centralized
Payment Processor

Transaction Settlement

Commercial Bank

Custody andAsset Management

Central Bank

Monetary Policy

Trust-Minimized Financial System

The Bitcoin Network

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2020, Coin Metrics

What is Bitcoin?
At its core, Bitcoin is free and open source software (FOSS), code that lives on the Internet.
Individuals can run the code or copy it and create their own variant. The Bitcoin network is
a complete financial system that facilitates the transfer and custody of bitcoin, a new digitalmonetary asset.
Lowercase ‘b’ bitcoin, the asset, is a standardized unit of value embedded in the network. Its value
acts as the signaling mechanism that aligns network stakeholders. In some ways, we believe it is
the purest form of money ever created:• It is a digital bearer asset similar to a commodity.
• It is scarce, divisible, portable, transferable, and fungible.
• It is an asset that can be matched by equity and custodied without liability or counterparty risk.
Importantly, bitcoin’s properties are native to the Bitcoin network.
While existing institutions must coordinate the functions of a financial system, Bitcoin operates
as a single institution. Instead of relying on accountants, regulators, and the government, Bitcoin
relies on a global network of peers to enforce rules, shifting enforcement from manual, local,
and inconsistent to automated, global, and predictable.19

19

Szabo, Nick. Money, Blockchains, and Social Scalability, 1 Jan. 1970, unenumerated.blogspot.com/2017/02/money-blockchains-and-socialscalability.html.

11Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

While traditional financial institutions are subject to appeal, Bitcoin has no such fallback. Bitcointransactions do not rely on trust but must be verified. In the absence of central enforcement,
its integrity is a function of its openness and transparency, a challenge to old world financial
institutions.

V. Bitcoin Is Designed to Satisfy the Four Economic Assurances
Assurance 1: Value should be exchanged globally and freely.
Why we believe Bitcoin Satisfies Assurance 1:
Bitcoin users can send any amount of value anytime to anyone anywhere.
Bitcoin allows anyone to participate. It does not rely on a centralized authority to control theflow of transactions or to determine the eligibility of participants. It identifies individual users20
not by personal names or IP addresses but by cryptographic digital keys and addresses. A digital
key consists of a public and private key, akin to a bank account number and a secret pin code.
Each key is unique and does not require Internet access. To receive bitcoin, users generate bitcoin
addresses associated with their public keys, akin to beneficiary names on checks,21 which arepossible destinations for Bitcoin payments. Today, the number of daily active bitcoin addresses isclose to 1 million, as shown below.
Figure 6: Bitcoin Active Addresses (30-day Average)
Active Addresses

Price

1 200 000

$18 000$14 000
800 000$12 000$10 000

600 000$8 000400 000$6 000

Bitcoin Price

Active Addresses (30-day Average)$16 000
1 000 000

$4 000200 000$2 000
0

$2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2020, Coin Metrics
20
21

While transactions do not ensure anonymity, nobody is forced to reveal their real-life identity.
Antonopoulos, Andreas M. “Mastering Bitcoin, 2nd Edition.” O’Reilly Online Learning, O’Reilly Media, Inc., www.oreilly.com/library/view/
mastering-bitcoin-2nd/9781491954379/ch04.html.

12Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

To send bitcoin, a user broadcasts a transaction to validators, known as nodes, in Bitcoin’s peerto-peer network. The nodes are volunteer computers running software to verify the network’s
integrity. Node operators range from individuals to large companies. Once a transaction isbroadcast, the user pays miners a bitcoin-denominated fee as miners “secure” the transaction.
To date, miners have earned $1.1 billion in fees cumulatively, securing more than 500 million
transactions, as shown below.
Figure 7: Cumulative Transaction Fees and Transactions Count
Cumulative Transaction Count$1 200 000 000

600 000 000$1 000 000 000

500 000 000$800 000 000

400 000 000$600 000 000

300 000 000$400 000 000

200 000 000$200 000 000

100 000 000$0Transaction Count

Transaction Fees (USD)

Cumulative Fees

0

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2020, Coin Metrics

While centralized services like PayPal might provide a more convenient means of payment, unlike
Bitcoin they do not provide censorship-resistant guarantees. Once secured by a miner, a Bitcointransaction is irreversible, with settlement guaranteed. Currently, Bitcoin appears to be more
efficient at settling high value than small value transactions. That said, as long as they pay fees tominers, Bitcoin users can send any amount anytime anywhere.
Since its creation, Bitcoin has settled more than $2.5 trillion in transactions, as shown in Figure 8,
the average size of which has been $2,000.

13

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

Figure 8: Cumulative Transaction Value Settled Versus Average Transaction Size
Cumulative Transaction Value

Average Transaction Value Size$100 000$10 000 000 000 000$10 000$100 000 000 000$1 000$10 000 000 000$100$1 000 000 000$10$100 000 000

Aveerage Transaction Size

Cumulative Transaction Value$1 000 000 000 000$1$10 000 000$1 000 000

$0
2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2020, Coin Metrics

Assurance 2: Wealth should be protected and owned wholly.
Why We Believe Bitcoin Satisfies Assurance 2:
Bitcoin has an embedded independent property system.
While legal structures and local authorities enforce the ownership of traditional assets, cryptography
enforces bitcoin’s ownership. The only requirement to own bitcoin is the ability to send and receive
it: the possession of a private key equates to ownership. Control is a function of the private keys.
With effective key management, bitcoin is easy to conceal and protect, difficult to seize or steal.22
Typically, users store private keys in databases called wallets that are separate from the Bitcoin
protocol and can be managed without access to the internet. A traditional wallet stores private
keys locally and offline but might also be stored on paper or in human memory.
By replacing the local enforcer with private key cryptography, Bitcoin introduces a propertysystem that can operate outside traditional systems. Bitcoin’s personal sovereignty is particularly
useful in jurisdictions with weak property rights, as suggested by its higher usage in countries withunstable property right enforcement.23
22
23

Lopp, Jameson. “The Dos and Don’ts of Bitcoin Key Management.” Casa Blog, Casa Blog, 11 Aug. 2020, http://blog.keys.casa/the-dos-anddonts-of-bitcoin-key-management/
Ahlborg, Matt. “Nuanced Analysis of LocalBitcoins Data Suggests Bitcoin Is Working as Satoshi Intended.” Medium, Medium, 20 May 2019,14

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

In our view, bitcoin is the deepest asset on the asset protection spectrum, given the absence of a
local protector.
Figure 9: Asset Protection Sprectrum

DigitalCash
Shallow Protection:
Protection is derived
from authority.

PhysicalCash

Real
EstateGold

BitcoinDeep Protection:
Protection can be derived in
the absence of authority.

Source: ARK Investment Management, 2020, Coin Metrics

Assurance 3: Rules should be enforced reliably and predictably.
Why We Believe Bitcoin Satisfies Assurance 3:
Bitcoin incorporates a unique system of checks and balances to maintain integrity.
“The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that’s required to make it work.
The central bank must be trusted not to debase the currency, but the history of fiat
currencies is full of breaches of that trust. Banks must be trusted to hold our money and transfer it
electronically, but they lend it out in waves of credit bubbles with barely a fraction in reserve.”		- Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of Bitcoin24

Bitcoin’s software formalizes its network rules. Humans are not the final arbiters of truth and cannot
decide unilaterally to change its rules. Instead, the nodes that verify transactions also enforce
the rules. Each node follows the same set of rules and is allowed in the network only if it follows
those rules. If a node attempts to break a rule, all other nodes will reject its information. Proposed
software changes are meaningless unless various stakeholders choose to accept them. Global anddisparate, nodes would not accept any compromise to the integrity of their bread and butter.
Nodes, however, are only one part of the equation maintaining Bitcoin’s integrity. Bitcoin
incorporates a unique system of checks and balances intended to encourage protocol innovationand maintenance, while making sure that any changes are in the interest of stakeholders.

24

medium.com/@mattahlborg/nuanced-analysis-of-localbitcoins-data-suggests-bitcoin-is-working-as-satoshi-intended-d8b04d3ac7b2.
“Bitcoin Open Source Implementation of P2P Currency.” P2P Foundation, p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source.

15

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

Key to the system of checks and balances is the value of bitcoin the asset,25 which provides an
economic incentive for stakeholders to resolve disputes and maintain the system’s integrity. No
stakeholder has preferential rights or treatments, but each stakeholder benefits from bitcoin’s
price appreciation, the network’s primary signaling mechanism. Any change that threatens thesystem’s integrity would threaten the value of bitcoin. Stakeholders therefore should have little
incentive to act maliciously.
The system of checks and balances, with four stakeholders, is detailed below.26
Figure 10: Bitcoin’s Governance Model
Arrows indicate
power relationships

MinersA
Decide to run
implementations by

Can threaten to
exclude transactions
from

has
power
over

Users

Give
feedback toCoreDevelopers

B

Incentivize
merchants who run

Write the software
provisioned to

Economic
Nodes

Source: Nic Carter, A Cross-Sectinoal Overview of Cryptoasset Governance and Implications for Investors,
https://coinmetrics.io/papers/dissertation.pdf

Bitcoin’s ability to maintain a predictable monetary policy is testimony to its robust systemof checks and balances. Bitcoin is the first verifiable digital asset that already is scarce: it ismathematically metered to top out at 21 million units. In contrast to modern central banking inwhich newly minted money finances government spending and lending, newly issued bitcoins
compensate miners who sequence and secure Bitcoin’s history of transactions.
Arguably, Bitcoin’s most valuable feature is its reliable monetary policy, as shown in Figure 11.
Arbitrary changes are highly improbable.

25
26

SFOX. “Bitcoin Governance: What Are BIPs and How Do They Work?” SFOX Edge, 22 May 2020, blog.sfox.com/bitcoin-governance-what-arebips-and-how-do-they-work-276cbaebb068.
Carter, Nic. “A Cross-Sectional Overview of Cryptoasset Governance and Implications for Investors.” Coin Metrics, University of Edinburgh
Business School, coinmetrics.io/papers/dissertation.pdf.

16

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

Figure 11: Bitcoin’s Predictable Monetary Policy
Cumulative Bitcoin Issuance

Supply Cap

Projected Bitcoin Issuance

25 000 000

Bitcoin Supply Cap
20 000 000

15 000 000

10 000 000

5 000 00002009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2020, Coin Metrics | Forecasts are inherently limited and cannot be relied upon.

Assurance 4: The system’s integrity should be verifiable.
Why We believe Bitcoin satisfies Assurance 4:
Bitcoin embeds native verification tools.
Bitcoin not only protects participants from harmful rule changes, but also enforces and verifies thefirst three assurances. Unlike in traditional financial institutions, individuals can fact check every
claim Bitcoin makes. Specifically, a Bitcoin node provides native verification tools that ensure theenforcement of each rule, as shown in the table below.
Table 1: Assurance 4: Bitcoin Participants Can Verify The System’s Integrity
Verified Assurance

Verification Type

Assurance 1:
Value should be exchanged globally and freely• Users can validate any inbound transaction• Users can verify bitcoins have not been spent more than once
and transactions have not been censored• Users can view the full history of transactions taken place on the network

Assurance 2:
Wealth should be wholly owned and protected• Users can verify ownership of bitcoin• Users can verify bitcoins have not been spent without access to theirassociated private keys

Assurance 3:
Rules should be enforced reliably and predictably• Users can audit the existing and future issuance of bitcoin is inaccordance with a predetermined and well defined schedule

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 202017

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

All nodes house Bitcoin’s history, tracking the balances of all accounts. Each node is equal toanother in its capability to verify and audit. Today, any individual can download a Bitcoin client,install a node, and audit/verify every transaction with little more than a computer command.
Bitcoin’s decentralization is a function of the low barrier to entry associated with running a node.
Today, thousands of globally dispersed nodes verify Bitcoin’s integrity inexpensively. Its native
verification tools enable financial auditability, encouraging entities building services on Bitcoin to
be transparent about their operations.27

VI. Bitcoin As An Investment
We believe Bitcoin is creating the possibility of a global monetary system controlled not by
nation-states but by individuals. By eliminating the need for a trust-based model, Bitcoin is calling
into question the current foundation of economic organizations and is paving the way for a morepredictable financial system.
Bitcoin presents investors with a unique opportunity. In Part 2 of our research, we will analyze
bitcoin as an emerging monetary asset. While many investors question its merit, in our viewbitcoin is the most compelling monetary asset to emerge since gold.
To continue reading, download Part 2 here: https://ark-invest.com/white-papers(Planned Publication of Part 2: September 10, 2020)27

For instance, a Bitcoin exchange can employ “proof of reserves”, a cryptographic trick proving to customers the amount of bitcoin it holds
on its balance sheet. https://medium.com/@nic__carter/how-to-scale-bitcoin-without-changing-a-thing-bc4750dd16c7.

18

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

About the Author
Yassine joined ARK in July 2018. As ARK’s Blockchain/Cryptoasset Analyst,
his research focuses on cryptoasset portfolio allocation, cryptoasset
institutionalization, and Bitcoin mining.

Yassine Elmandjra
Analyst ARK Invest@yassineARK

Prior to ARK, Yassine was a Summer Analyst at Rembrandt Venture Partners, a
SaaS focused early stage venture capital firm; and Arena Investors, a registeredinvestment adviser that originates investments with borrowers and othercounterparties who need access to financing and are otherwise not able to accessconventional sources. Yassine graduated from the University of Pennsylvania witha Bachelor of Science in Economics from Wharton and a Bachelor of Science inSystems Engineering from The School of Engineering.
Yassine has been quoted on Yahoo, Yahoo Finance, Coindesk, Bitcoin Magazine,
and Asia Times, among other publications. Additionally, Yassine was a featured
speaker at The Fidelity Mining Summit and has been a guest on notable cryptofocused podcasts, including Marty Bent’s Tales from the Crypt, Laura Shin’s
Unchained, Bitcoin Magazine, and Anthony Pompliano’s Off The Chain.

About Coin Metrics@coinmetrics

Coin Metrics was founded in 2017 as an open-source project to determine theeconomic significance of public blockchains. Today, we expand on that original
purpose to empower people and institutions to make informed crypto financial
decisions. We aim to onboard the world’s premier financial institutions into crypto
with the most trusted data and insights. Analysts involved in researching andwriting this paper are Nate Maddrey, Kevin Lu, and Jon Geenty.

ARK Invest Management LLC
3 East 28th Street, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10016

Coin Metrics Inc.
125 High Street, Suite 220
Boston, MA 02110

info@ark-invest.com
www.ark-invest.com

info@coinmetrics.io
www.coinmetrics.io

Join the conversation on Twitter@ARKinvest

19

Part 1 | Bitcoin: A Novel Economic Institution
Yassine Elmandjra, in collaboration with Coin Metrics﻿

©2020, ARK Investment Management LLC. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred
to in any other publication, without the express written permission of ARK Investment Management LLC (“ARK”).
The information provided is for informational purposes only and is subject to change without notice. This report
does not constitute, either explicitly or implicitly, any provision of services or products by ARK, and investors should
determine for themselves whether a particular investment management service is suitable for their investment
needs. All statements made regarding companies or securities are strictly beliefs and points of view held by ARK
and are not endorsements by ARK of any company or security or recommendations by ARK to buy, sell or hold any
security. Historical results are not indications of future results.
Certain of the statements contained in this presentation may be statements of future expectations and otherforward-looking statements that are based on ARK’s current views and assumptions and involve known andunknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially fromthose expressed or implied in such statements. The matters discussed in this presentation may also involve risks
and uncertainties described from time to time in ARK’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
ARK assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking information contained in this presentation.
ARK and its clients as well as its related persons may (but do not necessarily) have financial interests in securities
or issuers that are discussed. Certain information was obtained from sources that ARK believes to be reliable;
however, ARK does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information obtained from any third party.

ARK Invest Management LLC
3 East 28th Street, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10016

Coin Metrics Inc.
125 High Street, Suite 220
Boston, MA 02110

info@ark-invest.com
www.ark-invest.com

info@coinmetrics.io
www.coinmetrics.io

Join the conversation on Twitter@ARKinvest@coinmetrics

20