A technical community coalition for multistakeholderism (TCCM)
We are members of the Internet’s technical community: the companies, organizations, groups and actors
whose day-to-day job is to operate the critical infrastructure and services at the heart of the Internet.
A driver of innovation, progress and development, the Internet touches all aspects of human life. Thistransformative technology is governed through collaboration across varied overlapping stakeholders andprocesses—and involves the participation of distinct stakeholder groups: governments, civil society,academia, the private sector and the technical community. This form of collaborative governance or
dialogue is called multistakeholderism.
The technological success of the Internet—the reason it works seamlessly across the globe—is the direct
result of this multistakeholder approach and its use in various fora and initiatives. This approach enables
stakeholders to come together on an equal footing to discuss or make decisions about the Internet andto foster its ongoing evolution and expansion.
Although imperfect, the multistakeholder approach fosters a level of diversity, accountability andtransparency that cannot be replicated in intergovernmental environments alone. It also ensures thatdecision-making about the Internet and its governance isn’t led by individual nation-based politicalinterests.
However, the multistakeholder approach is under threat. In a period of critical decision-making at theUnited Nations taking place across 2024 and 2025, there are risks that:●●●the technical community and other key stakeholder groups will be left out of—or have theirvoices weakened in—dialogues related to the future of the Internet and its governance.
in the absence of all relevant stakeholders, new concepts that inadvertently destabilize themultistakeholder model may be introduced.
the mandate of the annual Internet Governance Forum, a key and enduring space formultistakeholder dialogue about the Internet, is not renewed or the Forum is weakened by the
introduction of better-resourced, intergovernmental initiatives.

Taken together, if such risks materialize, the multistakeholder model of Internet governance would beweakened and decisions about the Internet’s operations would increasingly be made inintergovernmental or multilateral settings.
We the undersigned are committed to defending, evolving and strengthening multistakeholderism indecision-making and dialogues about the Internet. It is imperative that the people who manage theInternet’s operations are involved—on equal terms as governments and other stakeholders—indiscussions, deliberations and decisions about the Internet’s future and its governance.
An evolved and strengthened multistakeholder approach is the best path forward to ensure that theInternet remains open, free, global, secure, resilient and interoperable—available to all.

Signatories as of 11 June 2024
(in alphabetical order)
Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC)
Associação DNS.PT, Portuguese Registry
au Domain Administration Ltd (auDA)Blacknight
Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA)
DENIC eG
GoDaddy
Identity Digital
IE Domain Registry CLG trading as .ie
InternetNZ
Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC)
Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.
Network Information Center Costa Rica
Nominet UK
Public Interest Registry
Tucows, Inc.