Caspar Netscher(Prague or Heidelberg ca. 1639 – 1684 TheHague)

How to cite
Bakker, Piet. “Caspar Netscher” (2017). In The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 2nd ed. Edited by Arthur K.
Wheelock Jr. New York, 2017–20. https://theleidencollection.com/artists/caspar-netscher/ (archived June2020).
A PDF of every version of this biography is available in this Online Catalogue's Archive, and the Archive ismanaged by a permanent URL. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative
occurs.

According to Houbraken, Caspar Netscher was born around 1639. His parents were the sculptor JohannNetscher (d. 1639) from Stuttgart and Elizabeth Vetter, daughter of a Heidelberg burgermeister.[1] Johan’sfather is said to have worked at the court in Heidelberg and Prague. Johann died shortly before Caspar’sbirth. His widow, fearing the dangers of the Thirty Years’ War that was then still raging, fled the region andafter many peregrinations finally settled with her children in Arnhem. She died soon thereafter, and Arnold
Tulleken, the local doctor, took Caspar in. Tulleken initially gave the boy a medical education, but when
Caspar displayed a propensity for drawing, Tulleken apprenticed him to the Arnhem painter Hendrik Coster(ca. 1620–64).[2]Thanks to the mediation of “Wynant Everwyn, who was a cousin of Ter Borch,” Netscher entered theworkshop of Gerard ter Borch (1617–81) in Deventer around 1655.[3] Here he received the second part of his
training, and mastered Ter Borch’s refined style to perfection. He subsequently stayed on as an assistant until
about 1659. In Deventer Netscher painted the portrait of Christine van der Wart (1620–66), wife of the Arnhem
draper Willem Craeyvanger (1615/16–after 1666). This is one of Netscher’s earliest portraits and the pendantof the portrait Craeyvanger had earlier commissioned from Paulus Lesire in The Hague.[4] In the years that
followed, Ter Borch’s workshop also turned out eight individual portraits of the couple’s children, now in The
Leiden Collection, with Netscher and his teacher being responsible for four each.[5] In addition to portraits,
Netscher painted genre scenes in which he repeated, sometimes with minor adjustments, works by histeacher. Striking in this respect is that he signed these copies and variants himself, suggesting that he had aprivileged position in Ter Borch’s workshop.[6]According to Houbraken, upon completing his training under Ter Borch, Netscher went to Holland to work for© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Caspar Netscher
Page 2 of 5art dealers. If he, in fact, left Deventer, he did so around 1658.[7] Dissatisfied with his situation, Netscher
decided to travel to Rome. His journey, however, took him no farther than Bordeaux, where he fell in love withMargaretha Godyn (d. 1694), whom he married in November 1659.[8] Having worked in Bordeaux for sometime, he came into contact with Marinus de Jeude, a wealthy art lover and collector who persuaded him to
return to the Dutch Republic. Netscher settled in The Hague in 1662, and joined the local painters’
confraternity Pictura in the same year.
In The Hague, Netscher painted portraits, genre scenes and history pieces. He was in the habit of making
drawings of his finished work, a number of which have been preserved.[9] On these so-called ricordi he noted
information such as the prices, names of his patrons, and annotations regarding composition and color. Fromthese notations it appears that Netscher’s work did not initially fetch high prices. He received 66 guilders
for a Vertumnus and Pomona in 1664, and 50 guilders for a portrait of a woman in 1667.
Netscher was one of the few genre painters in the court city. Evidently, this kind of painting did not find
immediate favor with the internationally oriented elite. The artist excelled primarily in depictions of just one or afew figures absorbed in simple everyday activities. A splendid example of this is the Lace Maker, which
demonstrates the artist’s fine eye for detail as well as his remarkable skill in the rendering of textures, inparticular shimmering silk.[10]Probably because he could not support his family with genre paintings alone, Netscher increasingly turned toportraiture, meeting with great success. If in his genre scenes Netscher continued to model his work on that of
Ter Borch, in his portraits he drew on French examples. In this choice, not only did he distinguish himself fromflourishing Hague colleagues, such as Adriaan Hanneman (ca. 1604–71) and Jan Mijtens (ca. 1614–70), but
he also cleverly played into the growing interest in small, less formal portraits displaying a refined elegance.
Netscher generally situated his sitters before a background of sumptuous draperies with a view of a parklike
landscape. His clients came from the Hague patriciate, as well as circles around the city’s court and thediplomatic world. Netscher received commissions from outside The Hague as well, primarily Amsterdam,
where he portrayed burgomaster Cornelis Bicker (1592–1654) and members of the Six family. He also
enjoyed international renown and regularly welcomed high-ranking visitors in his Hague workshop. Cosimo III
de’ Medici (1642–1723), for instance, bought a number of copies after works by Ter Borch from him around
1668–69.
Netscher was highly productive, even when he was plagued by bouts of gout and confined to his bed. He onlystopped working on 15 January 1684, according to Houbraken, “when this affliction affected his bowls, andcaused his death.”[11] When Margaretha Godyn died in 1694, having married again three years after
Netscher’s death, an inventory was drawn up of her possessions, which included many works by her firsthusband.[12] Her estate bears witness to a certain affluence, and her inventory can be considered a
posthumous reflection of Netscher’s prosperous career.[13] The artist’s three sons followed in his footsteps,
the most gifted of whom was Theodorus (1661–1728).[14]- Piet Bakker, 2017
© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Caspar NetscherPage 3 of 5Endnotes

1. Marjorie E. Wieseman found nothing in the German archives to support Houbraken’sstatement. In the Amsterdam wedding registers, however, she found a “Johannes Nescher,schilder” (Johannes Netscher, painter), who married Susanna Jans (d. 1659), widow of thepainter and art dealer Maerten van Balckeneynde (d. 1631) from Rotterdam, in 1632. She
thinks that this Johannes may have been Caspar’s actual father. Although the name
Netscher occurs only rarely in the Dutch Republic, I consider Houbraken’s version to be
more likely, certainly as long as no documents are found in which Caspar can be related toany member of the Netscher family referred to by Wieseman; Marjorie E. Wieseman, Caspar
Netscher and Late Seventeenth-Century Dutch Painting (Doornspijk, 2002), 23.
2. Coster was probably born in Arnhem around 1620. He was a portraitist and still-life painter. In
1638 he copied a portrait of Duke Karel van Gelre (d. 1538) for the court of Gelderland.
Coster later left for Groningen, joining the guild there in 1656, and died in 1664. Hendrik
Coster was also acquainted with the patrician Everwijn family. In 1639 he painted a portrait ofthe then six-year-old Jacob Everwijn (1633–1709), of which the present whereabouts areunknown. Jacob was later advocate of the audit office of Gelderland and Zutphen, andalderman and burgomaster of Arnhem; his parents were Johan Everwijn and Christina
Kelffken.
3. “Wynant Everwyn, die een neef van Terburg was.” Arnold Houbraken, De groote schouburgh
der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen (Amsterdam, 1718–21; rev. ed., TheHague, 1753; reprint, Amsterdam, 1976), 3: 94. Houbraken was probably mistaken andmeant Willem Everwijn, see Marjorie E. Wieseman, Caspar Netscher and Late SeventeenthCentury Dutch Painting (Doornspijk, 2002), 24; Ariane van Suchtelen and Menno Potjer, “DeArnhemse familie Craeyvanger – een bijzondere groep portretten door Paulus Lesire, Gerard
ter Borch en Caspar Netscher” Oud Holland 127 (2014): 15n12. The intermediary between
Netscher and Ter Borch was probably Willem Everwijn (1613–73), the son of Reynier
Everwijn (1585–1630) and Naleke Craeyvanger (1585-1650) and tax collector of Arnhem,
who was married to Johanna Kelffken (1631–1701), the daughter of Johan Kelffken(1583–1652) and Clara van Bronkhorst (1593–1652). Willem thus held the same position asTer Borch’s father in Zwolle. See the biography of Gerard Ter Borch in this catalogue. Thecouple sat for Ter Borch in 1653. See Johan Carol Bierens de Haan, ed., Gelderse gezichten:
Drie eeuwen portretkunst in Gelderland, 1550–1850 (Exh. cat. Nijmegen, Museum HetValkhof) (Zwolle, 2002), 120–21, nos. 30, 31; S.J. Gudlaugsson, Gerard ter Borch (TheHague, 1959–60), nos. 103, 104. Houbraken calls Everwijn a cousin of Ter Borch; thispresumed family relationship, however, has not been confirmed.
4. Paulus Lesire, Portrait of Willem Craeyvanger (1615/16–after 1666), 1651; and Caspar© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Caspar Netscher
Page 4 of 5Netscher, Portrait of Christine van der Wart (1620–66), ca. 1655–56 (both The LeidenCollection, New York); see their entries and the biography of Paulus Lesire in this catalogue.
5. Gerard ter Borch, Portrait of Jan Craeyvanger (1641–after 1668); Gerard ter Borch, Portrait ofWillem Craeyvanger (1643–after 1712); Gerard ter Borch, Portrait of Reijnder Craevanger(1645–after 1675); Gerard ter Borch, Portrait of Engel Craeyvanger (1649–after 1671);
Caspar Netscher, Portrait of Peter Craeyvanger (1650–after 1670); Caspar Netscher, Portraitof Gerrit Craeyvanger (1651–1674); Caspar Netscher, Portrait of Lijsbetch Craeyvanger(1653–?); Caspar Netscher, Portrait of Naleke Craeyvanger (1655–1676) (all ca. 1658, TheLeiden Collection, New York); see their entries in this catalogue. See also Ariane vanSuchtelen and Menno Potjer, “De Arnhemse familie Craeyvanger—een bijzondere groep
portretten door Paulus Lesire, Gerard ter Borch en Caspar Netscher” Oud Holland 127(2014): 7–24.
6. The museum in Gotha, for example, owns a signed and 1655 dated copy by Netscher of Ter
Borch’s Paternal Admonition, and in a private collection is a somewhat handsomer version
from 1659 of Ter Borch’s 1635 Doctor’s Visit. Peter Hecht, ed., Hollandse Fijnschilders: Van
Gerard Dou tot Adriaen van der Werff (Exh. cat. Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum) (Amsterdam,1989), 156n1. Both paintings are illustrated in Sturla J. Gudlaugsson, Gerard ter Borch (TheHague, 1959–60), 117, no. 110 IIa; 56, no. 4b.
7. According to Wieseman, he might have worked as a copyist for a Hague dealer; Marjorie E.
Wieseman, Caspar Netscher and Late Seventeenth-Century Dutch Painting (Doornspijk,2002), 25.
8. Houbraken relates that Netscher had a letter of recommendation from Tulleken “aan zynNeef Neny” (to his cousin Neny) in Bordeaux. He would have been referring to the Arnhem
merchant Jacob Noeij, married to Elizabeth Evertsdr Tulleken, who lived in Bordeaux; Arianevan Suchtelen and Menno Potjer, “De Arnhemse familie Craeyvanger—een bijzondere groep
portretten door Paulus Lesire, Gerard ter Borch en Caspar Netscher” Oud Holland 127(2014): 13n11. See also Jacobus Anspach, “De Veluwsche familie Tulleken en hare
aanverwanten,” Heraldieke Bibliotheek Nw. Reeks, vol. 3 (1881): 36.
9. Abraham Bredius, “Een en ander over Caspar Netscher,” Oud-Holland 5 (1887): 264–65.
10. Lace Maker, signed and dated 1662 (Wallace Collection, London).
11. “Toen deze kwaal in zyn ingewanden geslagen, hem de dood [had] aangebragt.” Arnold
Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen(Amsterdam, 1718–21; rev. ed., The Hague, 1753; reprint, Amsterdam, 1976), 3: 96.
12. For a transcript of this inventory, see Marjorie E. Wieseman, Caspar Netscher and Late
Seventeenth-Century Dutch Painting (Doornspijk, 2002), 143–48, doc. 99; published earlier in
Abraham Bredius, “Een en ander over Caspar Netscher,” Oud-Holland 5 (1887): 267–74.
13. When her estate was divided among her children on 15 September 1699, its total value was© 2020 The Leiden CollectionPowered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Caspar Netscher
Page 5 of 5

close to 37,000 guilders. The paintings were worth more than 4,000 guilders. Marjorie E.
Wieseman, Caspar Netscher and Late Seventeenth-Century Dutch Painting (Doornspijk,2002), 151, doc. 110.
14. The takeover of the workshop did not transpire smoothly, for Netscher’s widow, Margaretha
Godyn, seems to have been in debt. According to Van Gool, she was a shrewd
businesswoman who ran the house with an iron fist. She had her hands full primarily with hertalented eldest son, Theodorus, who was a bit of a rake and continued to misbehave despite
his mother’s exhortations. To get out from under her, he left for Paris in 1680, where he met
with great success. This notwithstanding, he returned to The Hague in 1700. In the meantime,
he had established his reputation and, emulating his father, he portrayed numerous
eminences, including King-Stadholder William III (1650–1702) and King Frederick I of Prussia(1657–1713). Theodorus left for England in 1715, and returned in 1722. Constantijn Netscher(1668–1723) had less natural talent and painted in the same manner as his father, whereby itis sometimes difficult to distinguish between their portraits. Anthonie (1679–1713), the third
son who elected to become a painter, left after squandering his father’s inheritance for the
East Indies and died there in 1713.

Literature
Houbraken,Arnold.

De

grooteschouburgh

derNederlantsche

konstschilders

enschilderessen. Amsterdam, 1718–21; revised edition published in The Hague, 1753; reprinted
in Amsterdam, 1980, 3: 92–96.
Bredius, Abraham. “Een en ander over Caspar Netscher.” Oud Holland 5 (1887): 263–74.
Hecht, Peter, ed. De Hollandse fijnschilders: Van Gerard Dou tot Adriaen van der Werff. Exh.
cat. Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum. Amsterdam, 1989, 156–80.
Wieseman,MarjorieE.

CasparNetscherandLate

Seventeenth-Century

DutchPainting. Doornspijk, 2002.
Van Suchtelen, Ariane and Menno Potjer. “De Arnhemse familie Craeyvanger—eenbijzondere groep portretten door Paulus Lesire, Gerard ter Borch en Caspar Netscher.” Oud
Holland 127 (2014): 7–24.

© 2020 The Leiden Collection