Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines:
Linking Education with NGOs, Social Movements and Civil Society*
Rey TyF

ormal, informal, and non-formal education programs play a
crucial role in the promotion of human rights and social justice that
leads to sustainable peace. Transformational education challenges
traditional hegemonic powers and structures to bring about social change.
This article documents the modest but longitudinal contributions to social change of a human rights and peace educational program by initiallyfacilitating interfaith, intra-faith, and inter-ethnic dialogue in Mindanao,
Philippines. Lessons learned in general and best practices in particular arepresented at the end of the paper. For people engaged in development or
advocacy activities of non-governmental organizations in the civil society
as well as social movements engaged in social change, education provides avenue for reflection to link social practice and theory.
Many education programs are forms of human rights or peace education, though called by different names. Studies indicate that these programs are given a variety of names from “Ngo Development Program”
and “Participatory Leadership Skills Development” (Teleki, 2007), to“Education for International Understanding” (Toh, 2005), “Education for
Sustainable Development” (Toh, 2005), “Values Education” (Toh, 2005),“Citizenship Education” (Keating, Kerr, Lopes, Featherstone, & Benton, T.,
111

112

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i c2009), “Holistic Approach” (Müller, 2009) and “Education for Citizenship”(Blümor, 2008). One such program, though not labeled as human rights orpeace education program and yet deals with both, is the “Philippine Youth
Leadership Program” (pylp).
In this connection, important social issues such as power relations, class,gender, ethnicity, and religion must be addressed in youth and adult education to advance a critical pedagogy that promotes social transformation.
Informal training must uphold the philosophy of social justice and peace toadvance the objectives of human rights, equality and non-discrimination.
Through informal education, participants should be engaged in theformation of individual and social transformation, community empowerment, and promote just power relations at home, work, in the society atlarge and in the world in general. Through critical pedagogy, participants
should be able to continue the struggle against racism, sexism, inequality,
and all forms of discrimination, and continue working for women’s empowerment, human rights, fairness, justice for all, and peace. In short, education
for justice and peace advances the objectives of human rights, equality, andnon-discrimination. Clearly, our approach is not merely psychological, butsocial. We do not only think about solving interpersonal problems but actually seek to bring about changes in favor of social justice and human rights
in order to attain just peace.
Philippine Context
The Philippines is a social context with profound socio-economic inequalities, racism, sexism, discrimination, violence, and conflicts. It is also a social
context where rampant violations of civil liberties and civil rights occur.
Parliamentary Struggle. Those who form part of civil society as wellas those in the public service who are actively involved in social movements
demand an economic development that benefits the majority of the Filipino
people. Many non-governmental organizations (ngos) try to facilitate theestablishment of structures and frameworks that help organize the people
into action. Some of them are inside the “belly of the beast” and directly
or indirectly engaged in activities related to the media and the legislature,including campaigning and lobbying for policy change. Some are sectoral
representatives in the legislature such as those for the women sector (e.g.,Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

113

Liza Maza of the gabriela Women’s Party) and for the masses (e.g., Satur
Ocampo of the Bayan Muna party).
Extra-Parliamentary Struggle, Civil Disobedience, and Repression.
Many others resort to extra-parliamentary mass mobilization and acts ofcivil disobedience. Their cries for justice and against oppression were met
with repression. Victims and survivors of human rights violations today
include not only peasants, workers, women, students, the church workers,
non-traditional politicians, and professionals, but also journalists and human rights defenders themselves. There is genuine concern for the protection of Filipinos who work for social justice against political killings, torture,
enforced disappearances, and other human rights abuses. To learn more
about these violations, read the reports of Amnesty International, Human
Rights Watch, and Reporters without Borders, which document innumerable cases of political killings and other forms of human rights abuses.
Armed Conflict. Because of the consistent pattern of flagrant humanrights abuses, many have decided to go underground and joined the revolutionary social movement. Some of the major revolutionary groups include the National Democratic Front, Cordillera People’s Democratic Front,
Moro National Liberation Front (mnlf), and Moro Islamic Liberation Front(milf). The mnlf later joined the government and its armed forces were
integrated into the Armed Forces of the Philippines.
The National Democratic Front, the Communist Party of the Philippines,
and its armed forces, the New People’s Army, have publicly declared thatthey abide by international humanitarian law (ihl). Ihl is sometimes known
as human rights in armed conflict. Hence, the rebels still respect human
lives (including civilians and people placed out of combat due to their
physical health conditions) and properties. The Communist Party of thePhilippines/New People’s Army/National Democratic Front (cpp/npa/ndf)
and the Philippine government signed in March 1998 the Comprehensive
Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian
Law (carhr-ihl).1 In 2001, the Tripoli Agreement on Peace between the
grp [Government of the Republic of the Philippines] and the milf (tap)was signed on 22 June 2001.2 The playing field is level, as the government
and its forces are bound by international legal provisions, including ihl.
Peace Talks. From time to time, either the rebels or the government
unilaterally declare ceasefire, including, among others, in times of religious
holidays, be they Christian or Muslim. However, people in ngos, especially

114

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i csocial movements, sometimes call for all parties to the conflict to have aceasefire, particularly when the armed conflict intensifies. When ceasefire
takes place, this is the time during which revolutionary leaders sit downwith government representatives in peace talks. Critical reflection leads tothe laying down of the agenda on the table upon which the parties to theconflict base their dialogue.
While dialogue between the parties to the conflict is necessary, it is not
sufficient. Aside from reaching principled compromise, action that promotes social justice would speak louder than words. Unfortunately, social
injustice until now remains as the prevailing situation. Peace based on justice, therefore, continues to remain unreachable. For this reason, the struggle for justice persists.
Educational Intervention on Human Rights and Peace
The International Training Office (ito) of Northern Illinois University was
set up in 1981 in order to serve the international development community
through training programs, technical assistance, academic linkages, andprofessional consulting.3
It is involved in bringing participants from all over the world for all
types of short-term courses, from literature to women empowerment, engineering, and law. Ito serves the international development community
through training programs. It provides assistance that addresses the societal
and institutional needs of different sectors in the Third World countries.
The overall program of ito aims to strengthen the capacities of international professionals and leaders from public, non-profit, or private sector
organizations to become catalysts for change in their home countries. Itoaccomplishes this mission through innovative training programs and outreach activities that address institutional, professional, and societal needs.
The specific objectives of the program are the following:• To sharpen the participants’ skills in conflict resolution/transformation, inter-ethnic and intra-faith dialogue, tolerance, leadership,coalition-building, and community activism• To enhance the participants’ appreciation of their similarities anddifferences through various interactive activities that will serve asavenues for open dialogue

Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines•

115

To provide participants with tools for working collaboratively
across ethnic and religious lines• To develop in the participants an appreciation of the cultural, religious, and ethnic diversity of Midwest America, in order to learn
lessons about practices of multiculturalism that might be applicable in their own local contexts.
The program revolves around several themes: (1) conflict resolution, (2)inter-ethnic understanding, (3) inter-generational understanding, (4) intrafaith understanding, (5) community activism and volunteerism, (6) U.S. institutions that promote diversity and pluralism, and (7) leadership development and transformation. Resource persons act as lecturers or workshop
facilitators. Faculty members and retirees from niu who have served asresource persons included, among others, Susan Russell, Betty La France,
Wei Zheng, Laurel Jeris, LaVerne Gyant, Avi Bass, and Chris Birks. Non-niu
resource persons either hold their training sessions at niu or in their respective institutions in Illinois or Indiana. These themes are discussed in consideration of the actual historico-economic-socio-politico-cultural contextsof the issues. Thus the discussions focus on the real human rights problems
facing the people in general and the participants in particular: income inequality, extreme poverty, racism, discrimination (against people of different color, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, ability, age, etc.), gender gap,
refugees, fundamentalism in all religions, and social injustice in other areas.
As a result, the call for human rights promotion and protection becomes
more concrete, being in response to actually existing societal challenges.
The peace education program at niu involves three general learning objectives: knowledge, skills, and values.
Based on the objectives of the program, the evolving curriculum iscomposed of the following themes: conflict resolution, inter-ethnic understanding, inter-generational understanding, intra-faith understanding,community activism and volunteerism, contemporary U.S. institutions that
promote ethnic diversity and religious pluralism, as well as leadership development and transformation. Not only have the themes changed throughthe years, based on the general titles of the grants and the recommendationsof the funding agency, but also the specific contents of each theme, basedon the actual needs of the participants and the availability and skills of the
facilitators.

116

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i c

ACCESS-PYLP Training Program
Ito implements the Access to Community and Civic Enrichment forStudents - Philippine Youth Leadership Program (access-pylp) training
programs at Northern Illinois University. It has three major goals. First, it
advances a dialogue and promotes greater mutual understanding among
Muslim, Lumad (indigenous), and Christian youth from the Autonomous
Region of Muslim Mindanao (armm) and surrounding provinces. Second,it creates a cadre of leaders that will work toward an enduring peaceful coexistence among all groups within the armm upon their return home. Third,
it promotes a better understanding of the United States—its people, culture,values, and civic institutions.
Access-pylp has five specific objectives. First, it seeks to sharpen theparticipants’ skills in conflict resolution and management, inter-ethnic cooperation and tolerance, leadership, coalition-building, and community activism. Second, it seeks to enhance the participants’ appreciation of theirsimilarities and differences through various interactive activities that serve
as avenues for open dialogue. Third, it seeks to provide participants withtools for working collaboratively across ethnic and religious lines. Fourth,
it seeks to develop in the participants an appreciation of the cultural, religious, and ethnic diversity of Midwest America by making use of niu’s
proximity to Chicago, Springfield (the seat of the Illinois state government),and Indianapolis. Finally, it seeks to give participants access to community
projects in DeKalb and in the Chicago areas so that they can gain first-handexperience in volunteer community work, civic participation and community leadership.
In general, both youth leaders and adult leaders have to obtain institutional endorsement as well as have character references. Both groups alsoneed to have good English language skills, as the program is conducted in the
U.S. Lastly, applicants must not have previous significant travel to the U.S.
on a U.S. government-sponsored program. Upon their return to Mindanao,
both the youth and adult leaders must agree to implement at least one community project and thereafter attend the follow-on activities, during which
they present reports of their project implementation, reflect on the lessons
learned, and concretely plan their work as a group in the immediate future.
Aside from the general selection criteria, there are separate sets of criteria specific to youth and adult leaders respectively. Youth leaders must beYouth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines117

students who are 15-17 years old. They must have demonstrated leadershipskills. Likewise, they must have demonstrated interest in community service. Youth applicants must have strong academic and social skills as well.
Furthermore, they need to have strong commitment to peace and unity.
For adults to qualify to attend the program, preferably they need to beteachers, ngo or community leaders who work with the youth and are notmore than forty years old. They must be involved in peace-related or community projects actively. In addition, they must implement at least one community project.
Barefoot Facilitators
The program participants are trained to become “barefoot facilitators,” aterm I coined to refer to popular educators and trainers who, depending on
the historical-social contexts, use whatever resources and methodologies
are available, from chalk talk to high-tech gadgets to pursue educational
objectives, and build structures from below in response to the problems andneeds of the poor, oppressed and deprived. Barefoot facilitators engage colearning partners in the communities in open dialogic exchanges that help
raise their consciousness as well as that of the exploited in society. Under
the program, the participants use heuristic “tool kits” in holding trainingthat encourages inter-ethnic dialogue, promotes conflict resolution and addresses issues involving justice and peace.
The tool kit of barefoot facilitators helps them organize educational andtraining programs for social transformation. It contains the basic ideas ofthe educational activities that the barefoot facilitators adapt to the specificneeds of the individual and the community.
Exposure and Immersion
Aside from attending sessions during which they learn new knowledge,
learn new skills, and acquire new values, the participants also see realities
and are engaged in exposure and immersion trips in the U.S. Prior to their
on-site visits, participants have a volunteer community service learning orientation, which provides an explanation of the reasons behind doing volunteer service, what to do, what to avoid, what to expect, and what to do after
the on-site trip.

118

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i c

Some places where participants go for their exposure and immersion
trips include, among others, the following: homeless shelter, retirement center, soup kitchen, and food banks. They do a host of volunteer work, including the following: serving food for the homeless, tutoring homeless children,
playing with homeless kids, entertaining senior citizens, or packing food
donations to be sent all over the U.S. and select poor countries around theworld. Such exposure and immersion trips give the participants an idea anda taste of what they can do in their localities, depending upon the actual local needs. Upon completing their volunteer work, they reflect on their workand on their own community needs, they prepare and work on their plansin the U.S. in preparation for the project implementation in the Philippines.
Instructional and Learning Strategies
Both content and process are important in animating workshops. The substantive elements of workshops must focus on different issues involving
human rights, social justice and sustainable peace. Participants may immensely enjoy and successfully absorb the fun processes of ice-breakers andteam-building activities, but more importantly they must remember thesubstantive aspects of collaborative social work and inter-ethnic or multicultural community transformation that they have to use when they returnhome. Fun is important; but substance must not be sacrificed for fun. They
need to be reminded about that.
The methods vary and can be used to convey different messages since
they are not bound to specific contents. For instance, “Concentric Circle” issimply an approach that is used to convey the message of dialogue, negotiation, enquiry, or conciliation. While both substance and form are vital to
the success of a workshop, interaction and fun are only the means and not
the end in view. Fun and interactive activities are important, but with nosubstantive message conveyed the workshop is substantively a failure. In
like manner, a boring and condescending lecture on conflict resolution by
an authoritarian speaker who disrespects the participants is a dismal failure.
To ensure the success of the interactive sessions, material and the needed technical support are provided. Some resource persons use audio-visualequipments as well as training supplies such as flipcharts, marker pens, scissors, colored paper, and yellow sticky note pads.

Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

119

Workshop participants are always reminded to keep in mind the situation on the ground in their own specific communities. Workshop participants can learn a lot about abstract concepts, interpersonal conflict, or the
U.S. situation. But they must be grounded on the economic, political, social, and cultural contexts in which they live. Whatever the workshops are,the facilitators must make the participants keep in mind and stress how thelearning experiences apply to their local situation. Resource persons andworkshop participants can be active co-learners as the former conducts interactive activities, while the latter share how the lessons they learned canbe applied to their local contexts. To make sure this is done, resource persons must ask questions during the Question and Answer (Q & A) session
on how the participant can apply their knowledge on the ground considering their specific social contexts.
Furthermore, when workshop participants reflect on the day’s activities
in their journal entries, they must be reminded to write about how and what
they have learned apply to their own situation. Interactive and participatory
process is important; but more important is the substance (namely, humanrights, social justice, and peace).
Debriefing is quite essential for a successful human rights and peace
program.
Once a week for five weeks, we facilitate a study circle where all theparticipants share their thoughts and plans. There are no professorial lectures for students, but dialogue among participants. Discussion and debate
are the main tools through which understanding emerges and critical consciousness awakened. Topics are based on the synthesis of knowledge, skills,
and values learned at niu as well as actual needs and issues with which theparticipants are confronted in their communities.
When everything is said and done, participants must be versed in strategic planning, organizational grassroots management, program planning,fund raising, coalition building, communications, and public relations.
When participants go home, they must not just “talk” (such as re-echoing
ice breakers and team-building activities) but “do” things. When they goback to their social contexts, they must do social action and concretely work
to build interfaith or inter-communal coalitions, collaborate, and adopt
causes that advance social justice and human rights.

120

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i c

Challenge
We challenge our alumni to promote peace on a daily basis. We challenge
them to do a hitherto difficult act of dialoguing with people of various ethnicities, languages, religions, genders, and economic backgrounds. There is
no shortcut to peace, which is a lifelong process and work. Everyone canbuild peace, block by block, by taking the first step of getting out of comfort
zones. Taking the first step to realize social justice and act for social change
erects the building blocks that bring about lasting peace. This means speaking out against anti-poor, discriminatory, racist and sexist remarks and defending people who are poor, people of all colors, and people of all genders.
Yet, there are still more things to do. We should not only be exposed topeople of all backgrounds but also work with them, and work for justicenot at one time but as a way of life. Then and only then can we have a world
where social justice and peace prevail and endure. We may not be able towitness such a world in our lifetime. But we have to start here and now. Go
forth and take this challenge! That’s our call to action.
Declaration of Commitment
One of the concrete outputs of the participants of each batch is a posttest
instrument called Declaration. Members of each batch collaborate and collectively work on producing a post-program document. They decide on thetitle and content of their declaration. During their post-program theater
production on the occasion of their “graduation” ceremony, participants
dramatically present their declaration. Their declaration is a statement of
their commitment to continue their work to promote peace based on justice. The content of each year‘s declaration is a testimony to the depth oftheir understanding of the causes of the context of armed conflict as well as
their profound commitment to work for social change based on justice andpeace.
As historical and social contexts change, the learning and social needs
also change in response to the concrete settings. We remind our alumni thatshould they plan to re-echo the U.S. program in their communities, theyneed to modify the workshop activities to fit the social demands, gaps andneeds on the ground. A barefoot facilitator is flexible, including in terms of
the use of time, to meet the specific needs of different community partners
and programs. Nothing is set in stone.

Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

121

Peace as Content
For the first program in the academic year 2003-2004, I started to use thedefinition of peace used by the United Nations’ University for Peace basedin Costa Rica. This often-quoted framework is shared with the participants
during the first couple of days of the five-week long program. “Six dimensions of a holistic framework for peace education, which—though developed in the Philippines context—[Swee-Hin Toh, unesco Peace Education
Laureate] [is considered to have] international relevance” (Brenes, 2003, p.
6). Below is an illustration of the peace concept of the University for Peace,
which in fact originated from the Philippines.
Fig. 1. United Nations Elements of Peace

Interactive activities that deal with the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights are inserted in the discussion of peace to emphasize the importanceof human rights. For the academic year 2008-2009, the participants cited anarticle of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a framework thatguides the writing and planning of their plans for action for social change.
Evaluation
The impact of the program on the participants is gauged using different
types of pretests and posttests. Quantitative tests in self-administered ques-122

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i ctionnaires generate quantitative data that show the extent of participants’new knowledge, skills and values that promote human rights, justice andpeace. In addition, participants write three essays: one pretest, another midterm and a final one. The three essays narrate their growth as well as doubts.
In addition, participants keep a daily journal. During the first coupleof years of project implementation, journals were handwritten. Participants
invariably end up burning the midnight oil on the eve of their departure to
write all of their missing journal entries. Upon completion, the sole hardcopies of their journals are submitted to the project administrators.
In the next couple of years, however, these journals will be uploaded toan online group. The required outputs include pretest, midterm, and posttest essays as well as their daily journals. Optionally, participants also upload
their poems, art work, and select photos.
Upon their return to their respective communities, the participants(now the alumni of the program) also fill out online survey questionnaires togauge changes in their knowledge, skills, and values. Invariably, evaluation
results yield positive changes on the individual participants/alumni as wellas on their schools, communities, and places of work, based on the impactof their interpersonal interactions as well as project implementation. On thewhole, the human rights and peace education program provides outcomesthat promote incremental but lasting changes. See table below for the components of the program.
Table 1. Logic Model for Human Rights and Peace Education Program
Program
Outcomes

Long-term
ImpactPhysical productor service
deliverySpecificqualitative
personal changes
as a result of
the learning
experiences

General andlasting changes

Project
Proposals andAction Plans,Community
Projects,
Training Manual,Book, Photo
Documentation,
Evaluation,
Reports

Increasedknowledge,
enhanced skills
for conflict
resolution, andheightened
respect forhuman rights andjustice which willlead to peace

Personaltransformationandtransformation in
the community
to which one
belongs (e.g.
school, office,and residence)

Items

Resources

Activities

Outputs

Criteria

Material, financial& humanresourcesneeded toaccomplish our
set of activities

Formal,informal andnon-formal
learning
activities

Elements

Human
Resources(Staff, Lecturers,
Workshop
Facilitators)
and Material
Resources(Audio-Visual
Equipment,
Training Supplies)

Workshops,
Lectures,Field Visits,
VolunteerCommunity
Service,
Theater
Production
andPerformanceYouth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

123

Initiatives for Mindanao
Ito has implemented a number of educational programs at Northern Illinois
University that benefit Mindanao, linking human rights to conflict resolution (Table 2).
Table 2. ITO Mindanao Programs
Year

Academic Year

Program Title

Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6

2003-2004
2004-2005
2005-2006
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009

Access to Community and Civic Enrichment for Students (ACCESS) Philippines
Project “Bridging the Gap: Engaging a New Generation in the Southern
Philippines in Inter-Ethnic Dialogue and Conflict Resolution”

Year 7

2009-2010

Philippine Youth Leadership Program: Engaging a New Generation in theSouthern Philippines in Inter-Ethnic Dialogue and Conflict Resolution
Philippine Youth Leadership Program: Building a New Generation of Citizens as
Catalysts for Social Change

Ito does not claim to have the capacity to solve “all the problems” in
the Philippines. On the contrary, its efforts are small attempts at sowing theseeds of justice-based peace in the lives of Mindanaons who get involved
in its activities. Note, however, that unless the root causes of the armed
conflict are addressed and solved, peace will not be forthcoming. NIU only
provides a venue in which participants from Mindanao engage in dialogue,
critical reflection, envision a just and peaceful Philippines, and prepare theirplans for action. Other than that, it does not claim to achieve anything moregrandiose.
Project Planning
The programs in Mindanao are the result of the participation of Mindanaoan
educators in the access-pylp. The first major component of the accesspylp, held in the U.S., includes learning new knowledge, skills, and values
that promote peace based on justice in the Philippines. The second mostimportant component is the preparation of a project plan in the U.S. thatwill be implemented in the Philippines. Initially, Jaya Gajanayake was themain trainer. Later, Wei Zheng took over the teaching responsibility. As with
Gajanayake, Zheng is most effective in her learner-centered pedagogy. In

124

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i c

the span of a one-whole-day workshop sessions, participants learn handson how to engage in environmental scanning, swot analysis, strategic planning, organizational development, and action planning. Thereafter, participants create individual plans as well as regional plans. Towards the end of
the five-week program, participants present their community plans and I
lead in providing constructive critique, which is a very daunting task, as I
have to simultaneously listen to their presentations, understand, think, andpropose ways of making their projects doable, measurable, concrete, anduncomplicated.
Community Projects
At niu, the participants present their project ideas and their plans on how
to implement them in the different communities. Some have overly ambitious projects. Hence, revision or a total change of project plans is needed
upon their return to Mindanao. The participants, now alumni, are involvedin the implementation of various community projects. They represent a variety of projects that respond to the needs of different communities. Table
3 contains various categories of community projects, which emerged fromthe list of different types of volunteer work that the alumni have undertaken.
Table 3. Community Activities Undertaken upon Returning to Mindanao
Categories of Activities
Arts, Culture, and Games
Relief for Evacuees or Internally Displaced Persons due to Armed Conflict
Environmental Projects
HygieneIndigenous Peoples’ Alternative Tour
Income Generating Projects
General Literacy-Related Projects: Basic Literacy, Books, Tutorials, Library
Neighborhood
SportsOthersThe different categories of activities listed above can be further classified into three major types of projects that promote change. They include (1)relief, (2) advocacy, and (3) development projects. In order to help victims

125

Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

and survivors, relief projects need to be implemented as soon as a humanmade or natural disaster happens. Human-made disasters include mass internal displacements of whole villages. Natural disasters include floods andtyphoon-caused damages. The second type of projects, advocacy, includes
consciousness-raising to advance equality, non-discrimination, humanrights, social justice, and peace. The third type of projects, development,
includes income-generating projects, environmental projects, and the production and marketing of local products. Table 4 below provides the activities being undertaken within each category.

Table 4. Relief, Advocacy and Development Projects Implemented in Mindanao through the Years
Relief

Advocacy

Development
Alternative Tourism

Human-Made Disaster Relief, suchas for Armed Conflict Evacuees,
Internally Displaced Persons or“Internal Refugees” (in layperson’s
language), including teachingdisplaced children in situation ofarmed conflict (CSAC)

Popular Education on Citizenship,
Human Rights, Social Justice & Peace(through Workshops & Art Work)Interfaith, Inter-Ethnic, & Intergenerational
Dialogue, Games, Sports & Other Forms
of Interaction

Cooperatives
Dole Outs & Donation ofBooks & School Supplies
Environment: Mangrove
Planting, Tree Planting,River Bank Clean Up
Income-Generating Projects
HygieneNatural Disaster Relief, such as for
Survivors of Floods, Typhoons, andOther Calamities

Equal Rights

Income-Generating Projects

Multiculturalism & Diversity

Neighborhood Projects

Literacy-Related Projects: Day Teaching
and Games

Waste Management,
Recycling, Composting,
Garbage Can Production

Formal education on human rights &peace in school curriculum

Production and Marketingof Products (products with
peanut or coconut as base)126

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i c

Networking
Since the first year of the implementation of this project, the alumni havebeen clamoring for the establishment of a formal network. As a U.S. based
institution and “outsider,” we decided not to be directly involved in setting
up the network. The birthing of a network must be initiated locally, organized locally, and grown locally. At hindsight, we believe we really did theright thing in letting the “baby” grow into an independent being, not dependent on the mother institution that cultivated it. As of this writing, there are
one hundred ninety-nine alumni who are part of the network; they in turn
recruit local partners to get involved in their continuing network-related
projects, which build and sustain a critical mass. See Table 5 below for ananalysis of the network.
Table 5. Longitudinal Analysis: A Network of Partners through the Years
Sex
Year

20032004

20042005

20052006

2006200720072008

Religion

Male

Female

Islam

Roman
Catholicism

Other
Christianity

Indigenous

SubTotal

Youth

10

16

12

13

0

1

26

Adults

3

4

3

4

0

0

7

Youth

12

14

12

11

3

0

26

Adults

6

2

4

3

1

0

8

Youth

9

14

10

8

3

2

23

Adults

7

1

5

3

0

0

8

Youth

8

12

8

9

3

0

20

Adult

4

2

2

1

2

1

6

Youth

7

15

10

11

1

0

22

Adults

3

2

2

2

1

0

5

Leaders

Total

33

34

31

26

27

127

Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

20082009

20092010

Youth

4

16

8

9

3

0

20

Adults

1

2

1

1

1

0

3

Youth

10

11

14

7

0

0

21

Adults

3

1

3

1

0

0

4

Youth

60

98

74

68

13

3

158

Adults

27

14

20

15

5

1

41

Youth &
Adults

87

112

94

83

18

4

199

23

25

199
Seven
Years
Total

1
There are records that show that Islam arrived in 1310 with the arrival of Tuan Timhar
Muqbalu in Sulu. Mr. Nelson Dino, a Tausug-Buranun Muslim Filipino from the Sulu archipelago, stated in an interview however that Islam came to Sulu in the 7th Century A.D.
Muslims in Sulu and Palawan archipelago and Zamboanga include Tausug (Buranun), Sama,
Yaka, Jama Mapun, Mulbug, Palawani, and Kalibugan. In mainland Mindanao, Islam arrived
around the 14th Century during the reign of Sharif Alawi. Muslims in mainland Mindanao
consist of Maranao, Maguindanao, Iranun, Kagan, and Sangir. Islam reached Manila in the 14th
Century with the arrival of Sharif Ali Barakat from Brunei in Sulu, then Manila (Fi Amanillah).
Many parts of what we now call the Philippines had been Islamized prior to the arrival of the
Spaniards and Christianity. But some members of these Islamized ethnic groups converted to
Roman Catholic or other Christian faiths later on. Thus, for example, some participants in the
program who are ethnically full or part Tausugs (one of the ethnic groups) have self-identified
as Christians. Today, some Filipinos who, for instance, are ethnically Tagalog or Kapampangan
who have converted to Islam are now Muslims and are called “Balik Islam” (back to Islam).
2
Some indigenous people in Mindanao have converted to Christianity and have self-identified as such, and therefore listed as Roman Catholic or Christian.

Technology and Social Networking
The participants cultivate relations with people in the U.S. of diverse ethnicities, religions, gender, and other differences through face-to-face interaction. But that is just the point of departure, a successful one at that. Upon
returning to their communities as alumni, they face new challenges.
Technology helps and is a “friend” in the networking work. Participants
and alumni are connected to each other through a variety of ways, all ofwhich involve some kind of technology. Initially, all participants at NIU areconnected through a web-based group. From there, they connect to one another mostly through cellular phone calls and text messaging. Alumni are
likewise connected through various Internet chat rooms, on-line “phone”

128

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i cconversations, Skype, Internet video chats, Facebook, Twitter, myspace, andLinkedin, all of which are accessible free of charge. In addition, many of theiractivities while at niu as well as in their communities are shared throughshort video clips on YouTube. While it is true that not everyone has a computer at home, more and more schools, in the remotest islands in Mindanao
have computers that are connected to the Internet to which students havefree yet slow access. Some alumni use the local Internet cafés to connect
with pylp folks. Ethernet communication facilitates friendly greetings asmuch as serious discussions about human rights violations occurring at the
moment and about joint projects that promote interfaith dialogue and thelike.
Lessons Learned and Best Practices
At niu, lessons have been learned and best practices were developed during
the period from academic year 2003-2004 to the present, 2009-2010. The
leadership curriculum included inter-ethnic dialogue, human rights, social
justice, conflict resolution methods, conflict transformation, community
activism and volunteerism, as efforts to bring about peace. However, welearned that a human rights framework helps the participants organize theirthoughts and make concrete plans for social change.
Actual experience in handling the program taught us first hand thatteaching and learning could not be context-free. For a program to be successful, we need to start by studying the “Mindanao Situation” by way oflectures and workshops. Instead of “teaching down,” we try very hard to
make sure that the participants bring their knowledge, skills and values“to the table” as starting point for discussions. The local knowledge of theFilipinos is discussed alongside the applicability to the local contexts in thePhilippines of concepts, theories, and approaches in the U.S. With constantdialogue between participants and lecturers, lectures are ensured not to be
too abstract and workshops not infantile. In this way, the participants canhave ownership of a program whose content and methods are appropriate
to their actual needs.
In terms of recruitment, in-country coordinators, especially Naga
Madale, try hard to make sure that through the years we reach and recruit
people from the farthest villages and islands to attend the U.S.-based program. While Muslims and “non-Muslims” are primary target participants,

Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

129

we try very hard to make sure that indigenous persons take part in the
program.
In addition, there is annual update and revision of the training manualsof the participants. An online group connects all—participants and training
staff. All written assignments are uploaded online to this electronic group.
Examples of uploaded assignments include pre-test, midterm, and posttest essays; project plans; art work; photos; and daily electronic journals (ejournals). Also, an annual book that documents the changing context, theproject plans, photo essays of implemented projects, annual declarations ofcommitment, art gallery, and photo gallery are produced and copies sent toall participants.
As part of dissemination work, libraries of major institutions in different
parts of the world receive hardcopies of these publications free of charge. In
addition, all publications have electronic version. These e-books are downloadable for free by all interested parties (visit www.niu.edu/CSEAS/current_initiatives/PYLP/PYLP_Publications.shtml.
The pylp program takes into consideration the existing conditions on
the ground. Preliminary sessions deal with in-depth social investigation of
the context that led to the armed conflict situation. Educational intervention in the U.S. provides an opportunity for participants to learn knowledge,
skills, and values that promote social justice, human rights and peace. More
importantly, the participants prepare their respective project plans that they
implement in their own communities a couple of months after their return.
A team of two persons from the U.S. (usually Susan Russell and anotherperson) go to Mindanao to join the alumni in follow-on activities where thelatter share stories of, and reflect on, their implemented projects in particular and on the direction of their continuing peace work in general. In 2009,
Mokaram Rauf of Council of Arab-Islamic Relations (cair) Chicago joined
Russell in attending the follow-on activities in Mindanao. Our alumni adore
Lina Ong and Russell. They also like and are impressed with Rauf, as heshowed his selfless devotion and genuine concern in doing volunteer community service in the villages, mingling with the common folks, and joining
community work, instead of showing himself off as an expert. The programin the U.S. is tweaked annually based on the recommendations and othercomments from all stakeholders, especially the alumni. The flowchart be-

130

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i c

low presents a holistic model of the training program grounded on actual
experience.
Table 6. Grounded Model of Human Rights & Peace Education based on Actual Practice on the
Macro, Meso & Micro Levels
Home or In-Country

MacroContext

Selectionof MicroParticipants

Host Country (U.S.)

1
Formal &Non-Formal
Educational
Intervention

2
MicroPlanningfor MesoAction to
PromoteSocialChangeHost
Country(U.S.)

Home or In-Country

3NGO
Community
Projects

Evaluative
Reflection on
Practice

SocialImpactInformal& Popular
Education
Interventions

Meso-Networking

Changing
Context

Program
Revision

Birthing of Similar Programs
Under the very able administration of Ong, Northern Illinois University
successfully implemented the access-pylp since academic year 2003-2004.
Due to the successes of ito work, the access-pylp program “gave birth” tohuman rights and peace programs for other parts of the world: (1) Cyprusand (2) Southeast Asia in general.
Cyprus. In 2006, Ong directed a very successful Bi-Communal Cyprus
Program for Youth. I wrote the project and budget proposal that Ong copyedited. Richard Orem was the Academic Director of the Cyprus program;Ong, the administrative director; and, myself as the Training Coordinator.
In the post-colonial period of its history today, Cyprus is a divided society.
The “Green Line” divides the country into two imagined communities: theTurkish Cypriots in the North and the Greek Cypriots in the South. They
live in “twin solitudes.” Untold sufferings have befallen both communities.
In the Cyprus program, we brought over twenty Turkish Cypriot students,
twenty Greek Cypriot students, two Turkish Cypriot adult leaders, and two
Greek Cypriot adult leaders to Northern Illinois University. Our Cyprus

Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

131

alumni now form a loose network whose aim is to strengthen the bonds ofTurkish and Greek Cypriots across the Green Line in order to foster a senseof bi-communal unity amidst diversity.
Southeast Asia. Based on the successes of the pylp that Ong and Russell
co-direct, the council members of the Center for Southeast Asian Studies(cseas) of Northern Illinois University decided to engage in a similar program for Southeast Asia as a whole. Ong, who is a cseas council member,
hired Garth Katner to prepare a project proposal that principally uses her
successful grant proposals as a template. As with the pylp, the Southeast
Asia Youth Leadership Program (seaylp) successfully competed and won
funding from the U.S. Department of State. Kate Wiegele, an anthropology
professor and a Filipinist, run the program. Tasked by Wiegele and upon
the recommendation of Ong, I trained the newly formed seaylp team.
Other key persons involved in the seaylp were Jim Collins and Deb Pierce.
Based on the lessons learned and best practices of pylp, I trained Wiegele
and her four staff members on the elements and process of the preparatory
work, program implementation, and post-program work. Under the helmsof Wiegele and with the wise advice of Ong as consultant, the operation of
seaylp program has been smooth sailing.
Recommendations
Many training organizers are tempted to keep participants tied down withnumerous activities that eventually turn out to be counterproductive. Other
training organizers “teach down” abstract or non-contextual materials toparticipants. This is another recipe for failure.
Based on ito’s best practices, therefore, we recommend the following:• Instead of “too heavy” programs, human rights and peace education programs should provide enough “free time” for deeper reflection and networking among participants;• Training organizers should ensure that their programs address at
the first instance the concrete contexts of the participants; theyshould refrain from dwelling on abstract concepts at one end andinsulting the intelligence of the participants by having infantile activities at the other end. Rather, participants should be encouraged
to engage in critical reflection that respects their actual experienceand level of intelligence.

132

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i c

On a different note, there are at least three models of working for changewith different impacts on the community: (1) the missionary model, (2) relief model, and (3) grassroots model. Figure 2 below illustrates the models.
Fig. 2. Working for Social Change

We recommend that human rights and peace education programs include both learning and action components, as in the ito program. In thisway, human rights and peace do not only remain on the realm of thinking,but extend to real-life action for social change. Note, however, that engagement in one model of action or another has different social impact. The topdown model is the easiest thing to do, as the outsiders themselves decide
what the community insiders need. An example of a top-down model is adole-out project where outsiders (donors) provide clothes, books, schoolsupplies, or food to the community. The relief model involves providing
help to survivors or victims of disasters, such as earthquakes, floods, and typhoons. It also involves urgently helping internally displaced persons (idps)
who flee from armed conflict situations. The grassroots model involves empowering community members themselves. Community members learn toand engage in needs assessment, write project plans and budget proposals, implement projects that really respond to their community needs andevaluate their work.
Aside from adding an action component in the post-program phase, we
recommend that participants be briefed about the social impact of each social action model. There is a great temptation to engage in projects using theYouth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

133

top-down model, whose impact (or euphoria) on both community outsiders
and insiders lasts only during the gift-giving period. Once the bubble bursts,
the community insiders are back to facing the hardship and helplessness intheir daily lives.
Projects along the lines of the relief model are very necessary and important, as people afflicted with untold suffering due to natural or humanmade calamities need immediate attention and help—psychological, economic and physical. And in cases government agencies are slow, corrupt
or both, non-governmental organizations (ngos) play a crucial role in providing immediate relief (such as provision of water, food, soaps, detergent,tents, boots, blankets, beddings, medical first aid, basic medicine, and sanitary supplies) to victims, survivors, and vulnerable groups. Projects involving the third type of work—grassroots empowerment model—have the longest lasting effect on communities.
Conclusion
The International Training Office of Northern Illinois University has been
continuously implementing a program since 2003 up to the present known
as Access to Community and Civic Enrichment for Students (access)Philippine Program and renamed it in the academic year 2006-2007 as thePhilippine Youth Leadership Program (pylp). The change in the title andannual themes reflect the changes in the program content and focus. While
not known as such, as in many related programs all around the world, thepylp program actually involves human rights and peace education.
Ito sees the value of longer lasting social change by ensuring that its
alumni work for grassroots empowerment. As a Chinese proverb goes:“Give people a fish, they will eat for a day. Teach people to fish, and they will
eat for the rest of their lives.”*Disclaimer: All views expressed in this article solely belong to the author anddo not represent the views of the institutions with which he is affiliated.

Endnotes
1
The Philippine government issued on 24 January 2005 Executive Order No.
404, “Creating The Government of The Republic of The Philippines Monitoring
Committee (Grp-Mc) on Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law” inorder to monitor the implementation of CARHRIHL.

134

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i c

2
The “Implementing guidelines on the humanitarian, rehabilitation and development aspects of the GRP—MILF Tripoli Agreement on Peace of 2001” provides
for the application of the provisions of international instruments and covenants on
International Human Rights Laws (IHRL) and International Humanitarian Laws
(IHL) entered into by the Government of the Republic of the Philippines.”
3
For further information on ITO, please visit: www.niu.edu/ito/aboutus/mission.shtml

For Further Reading:Blümor, R. 2008. Learning to live together: Design, monitoring, and evaluation of
education for life skills, citizenship, peace and human rights. Berlin: Federal Ministry
for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Brenes, A. 2003. “Promoting education for peace worldwide: The University for
Peace,” SangSaeng 7/5-11, 2003 Summer.
International Training Office. 2009. Mission. Retrieved November 12, 2009
from www.niu.edu/ito/aboutus/mission.shtml.
Keating, A., Kerr, D., Lopes, J., Featherstone, G., & Benton, T. 2009. Embedding
citizenship education in secondary schools in England (2002-08): Citizenship education longitudinal study—Seventh annual report. London: National Foundation for
Educational Research.
Müller, L. 2009. Human rights education in German schools and post-secondary
institutions: Results of a study. Boston: Human Rights Education Associates, Inc.
Russell, S. & Ty, R. 2010. “Conflict transformation efforts in the southern Philippines,” in Carter, C., editor, Conflict resolution and peace education:
Transformations across disciplines. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Russell, S., Ong, L., & Ty, R. 2010. Philippine youth leadership program:Inter-ethnic dialogue and conflict resolution. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University
International Training Office.
Teleki, K. 2007. Human rights training for adults: What twenty-six evaluation
studies say about design, implementation and follow-up. Boston: Human Rights
Education Associates, Inc.
Toh, S.H. 2005. Education for sustainable development and the weaving of a culture of peace: Complementarities and synergies. Kanchanaburi, Thailand: UNESCO
Expert Meeting for Sustainable Development (ESD): Reorienting education to address sustainability, 1-3 May 2005. Available at www.unescobkk.org/fileadmin/.../
esd/.../toh_culture_of_peace.pdf.
Ty, R., Editor. 2009. Training manual on youth leadership transformation & civic
engagement: Principles, tools, and strategies. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University
International Training Office.
Ty, R. 2009. “Where have all the indigenous peoples gone? A participatory action research: Embracing the moment to act in a time of change.” Proceedings of theMidwest Research to Practice Conference. Chicago: Northeastern Illinois University.

Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

135

Ty, R., Rajbhandari, A., Tusiime, M., & Hunting, E. 2009. “Armed conflict, adulteducation, and social change in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.” Proceedings of theMidwest Research to Practice Conference. Chicago: Northeastern Illinois University.
Ty, R., & Razvi, M. 2009. “Gender roles in post-colonial societies: Breaking stereotypes in Southeast, West, and South Asia.” Proceedings of the Midwest Research toPractice Conference. Chicago: Northeastern Illinois University.
Russell, S. 2008. Strengthening national security through peacebuilding coalitions: Countering insurgency in the Philippines through non-military means. Paper
presented at the symposium “Can the Philippines break out of its affliction? Prospects
for democratic governance, economic development and Philippine-U.S. relations.”
Washington, D.C.: Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns
Hopkins University, 7-8 April 2008.
Russell, S., Ong, L., & Ty, R. Editors. 2008. Philippine youth leadership program:Engaging a new generation in the southern Philippines in inter-ethnic dialogue andconflict resolution. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University International Training
Office and Center for Southeast Asian Studies.
Ty, R. Editor. 2008. Social injustice, armed conflict, popular education andsocial transformation: Training manual. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University
International Training Office and Center for Southeast Asian Studies.
Russell, S. 2008. Strengthening national security through peacebuilding coalitions: Countering insurgency in the Philippines through non-military means. Paper
presented at the symposium “Can the Philippines break out of its affliction? Prospects
for democratic governance, economic development and Philippine-U.S. relations.”
Washington, D.C.: Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns
Hopkins University, 7-8 April 2008.
Russell, S., Ong, L., & Ty, R. Editors. 2008. Philippine youth leadership program.
DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University International Training Office and Center forSoutheast Asian Studies.
Ty, R. 2008. Two women presidents later: Still dictatorship and democracy in thePhilippines. Chicago: Northeastern Illinois University.
Ty, R. 2008. “Moses, Jesus, Mary, Marx, and Freire Share Rice and Fish at
the Table: Post-Colonial Christians, Theology of Struggle, Gender, and National
Liberation in the Philippines.” Proceedings of the Midwest Research to PracticeConference. Bowling Green: Western Kentucky University.
Ty, R. 2008. “The Ties that Bind: Social Injustice, Rebellion, Peace Education,and Social Change.” Proceedings of the Conference on Education and the Public
Good: Emerging Trends in Interdisciplinary Research. Chicago: University of Illinois
at Chicago.
Ty, R., Konaté, M., & Carvalho, F. 2008. “Gender, Culture, and Religion:
Marginalization, Popular Education, and Empowerment of Women in Asia, Africa,and Latin America.” Proceedings of the Midwest Research to Practice Conference.
Bowling Green: Western Kentucky University.
Ty, R., Konaté, M., & Carvalho, F. 2008. “Critical Post-Colonial Feminism in Asia,
Africa, and Latin America: Gender, Advocacy, and Development.” Proceedings of theAfrican American Latino(a) Conference. Chicago: Northeastern Illinois University.

136

H u m a n R i g h t s E d u c at i o n i n A s i a - Pa c i f i c

Ty, R. 2007. “Evaluating Philippine Peace Education Program.” Proceedings of the
AHRD Conference. Indianapolis, IN: Academy of Human Resource Development.
Russell, S. & Ty, R. 2007. Armed Resistance, Peace Negotiations, Peacebuilding
Activities, and Conflict Transformation Efforts in the Southern Philippines. Paper presented at the Symposium on Conflict Transformation: Theory and Practice for Peacein Troubled Times, October 4-6, 2007, University of North Florida at Jacksonville.
Russell, S., Ong, L., & Ty, R. Editors. 2007. Inter-ethnic dialogue and conflict
resolution in the southern Philippines. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University
International Training Office and Center for Southeast Asian Studies.
Russell, S., Ong, L., & Ty, R. Editors. 2007. The autonomous region of Muslim
Mindanao & majority-minority relations in the Philippines: Religion, education, community & political process. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University International
Training Office and Center for Southeast Asian Studies.
Jeris, L., Baumgartner, L., Ty, R., Konate, M., & Diyadawa. 2007. “Imperatives
for Transformative Learning in Three Postcolonial Contexts.” Proceedings of theTransformative Learning Conference. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico.
Ty, R. 2007. “Positivism vs. Critical Theory: But Where’s the Third World?
Post-Colonial Practice and Theory-Building.” Proceedings of the African American
Latino(a) Conference. Chicago: Chicago State University.
Ty, R. & Alonto, A. 2007. “Intra-Faith Dialogue: The Missing Link in Interfaith
Dialogue.” Proceedings of the African American Latino(a) Conference. Chicago:
Chicago State University.
Ty, R. & Konaté, M. 2007. “Post-Colonial Feminism in Asia and Africa.”
Proceedings of the Midwest Research to Practice Conference. Muncie, In: Ball State
University.
Ty, R. 2006. “Oppression, Resistance, Social Justice, and Sustainable Peace:Transformative Education for the southern Philippines.” Proceedings of the African
American Latino(a) Conference. Chicago: Chicago State University.
Russell, S., Ong, L., & Ty, R. Editors. 2006. Inter-ethnic dialogue and conflict
resolution in the southern Philippines. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University
International Training Office and Center for Southeast Asian Studies.
Russell, S., Ong, L., Gonzalez, A., Ty, R., Madale, N., & Medina, N. Editors.
2005. The Mindanao conflict and prospects for peace in the southern Philippines: A
perspective of youth. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University International Training
Office and Center for Southeast Asian Studies.

Youth and Adult Education for Social Change in the Philippines

137

Annex APHILIPPINE YOUTH LEADERSHIP PROGRAM-YEAR 6 (2009)
A Statement of Commitment to
Human Rights, Justice and Peace in Mindanao
4 May 2009
We, the participants of the Philippine Youth Leadership Program (PYLP) held at
Northern Illinois University, from April 4 to May 6, 2009, understand that there are manycauses of the conflicts in Mindanao: historical, social, economic, political, territorial,and cultural. As with the national situation, the “Mindanao Problem” involves foreign
domination, poverty, inequality, corruption, and discrimination, all of which lead toendless internal armed conflict between the Philippine government and various rebel
groups, such as the National Democratic Front (NDF) and its member organizations,
Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). As wework towards a just and long-lasting peace, we enjoin all parties to the armed conflictto respect the laws of war. We realize that, being the new generation in Mindanao, in
the Southern Philippines, we must continue our work for promoting a culture of peace in
Mindanao.
We commit ourselves to engage in interfaith, intergenerational and inter-ethnic
dialogue in promoting mutual understanding and tolerance among Indigenous peoples,
Muslims, and Christians. If we want peace, we must work for justice. Hence, we arecommitted to struggle against social injustice, inequality, poverty, and corruption in our
respective communities in Mindanao. We are committed to work for economic, social,
cultural, civil, and political human rights. We are committed to fight for social justice,equality, and sustainable development in places where we live, study and work. We
pledge to speak out for those who are oppressed, exploited, and marginalized. We
pledge to stop stereotyping and discrimination. We vow to exercise our leadership for
community activism and volunteerism. We are committed to implement our community
projects and strengthen our common values underpinning justice, peace and peoplecentered sustainable development in all our communities.
We loudly call on the Philippine government to support our peace-building
efforts and the positive contributions of various non-governmental groups and social
movements in civil society to the peace process in Mindanao. While we entrust all
our commitments, endeavor, and dreams of a peaceful community to our almighty
Creator, we ourselves take small but concrete steps to fulfill our big dreams of a justand peaceful Mindanao in particular and the Philippines in general. Civil Liberties! Equal
Rights! Social Justice! Peace! Now! In Mindanao!