JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

JCM Verification Report Form
A. Summary of verification
A.1. General Information
Title of the project

Reducing GHG emission at textile factories by
upgrading to air-saving loom

Reference number

ID015

Monitoring period

01/01/2017- 30/09/2018

Date of completion of the monitoring report

04/02/2019

Third-party entity (TPE)

Japan Quality Assurance Organization (JQA)(TPE-ID-003)

Project participant contracting the TPE

Toray Industries, Inc.

Date of completion of this report

27/02/2019

A.2 Conclusion of verification and level of assurance
Overall verification opinion

Positive
Negative

Unqualified opinion

Based on the process and procedure conducted, JQA
provides reasonable assurance that the emission reductions
for Reducing GHG emission at textile factories by
upgrading to air-saving loom

Are free of material errors and are a fair representationof the GHG data and information, and

Are prepared in line with the related JCM rules,
procedure, guidelines, forms and other relevant
documents(If overall verification opinion is <State the reasons>negative, please check below andstate its reasons.)
Qualified Opinion
Adverse opinion
Disclaimer

1JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

B. Verification team and other experts

Name

Company

Function*

Mr.
Tadashi
Team
JQA
Ms.
YoshidaleaderMr.
Irhan
ExternalTeam
Ms.
Febiyanto
individual
memberMr.
SachikoInternal
JQA
Ms.
Hashizumereviewer
Please specify the following for each item.

Schemecompetence*

Technical
competence*

Onsitevisit

Authorized
Authorized
Authorized* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader, teammember, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of verification, findings and conclusions based on reporting requirements
C.1. Compliance of the project implementation and operation with the eligibility criteria of theapplied methodology<Means of verification>
The project was registered as a JCM project on 24/08/2018, which applied JCM approved
methodology ID_AM011_ver01.0 "Installation of energy saving air jet loom at textile
factory" under the scheme of Joint Crediting Mechanism between Republic of Indonesia andJapan.
The purpose of the project is to reduce CO2 emissions from energy consumption of aircompressors by replacing the existing weaving looms with the latest air-saving looms(Toyota JAT810). The project implemented at 3 sites of textile factory consists of 96 unitsof the latest air-saving looms (16 units at ISTEM, 17 units at CENTEX and 63 units at
Easterntex).

Toyota JAT 810 can reduce air consumption for weft insertion by more than

15% compared to the conventional model (JAT 710) and this effect contributes not only tothe reduction of CO2 emission from the electricity consumption of air-compressors but also to
the reduction of running cost.

Thus, the registered project has achieved 1,244 tCO2 of theemission reductions during the monitoring period of 01/01/2017 – 30/09/2018.
The JCM website indicates that the starting date of the project operation is 01/01/2017
and this monitoring period is from 01/01/2017 until 30/09/2018. It is confirmed through thereview of relevant documents, on-site assessment and the interview with the PPs that the3

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

monitoring of the project actually started on 01/01/2017.
JQA has assessed whether the project implementation and operation during the monitoring
period complies with the eligibility criteria of the applied methodology.
an on-site assessment was conducted on 10-11/01/2019.

After desk review,

JQA conducted a physicalinspection and interviewed with the PPs listed in Section F of this verification report.
The assessment results regarding the eligibility criteria are summarized as below:
Criterion 1
The project replaces existing air jet looms at a weaving factory with air jet looms
equipped with energy saving technologies such as an optimized shape reed’s tunnel ofnozzles and a pressure sensor to measure air pressure of nozzles for optimization ofcompressed air consumption of welt insertion.
Through the review of relevant documents, on-site inspection and the interview with thePPs, the project information of Criterion 1 in the PDD is confirmed as follows:-

The existing weaving looms at 3 sites of ISTEM, CENTEX and Easterntex have been
replaced by the latest air-saving looms (Model: JAT810) manufactured by Toyota
Industries Corporation which are equipped with energy-saving technologies such as
an optimized shape reed’s tunnel of nozzles and a sensor to monitor air pressure of
nozzles for controlling the compressed air consumption of welt insertion.

Hence, it is concluded that the project meets Criterion 1 with a satisfactory result during
the monitoring period.
Criterion 2
The air jet looms which are installed by the project reduce the specific air consumption byat least 15% compared with the reference air jet looms in line with the description in Section
I of this methodology.
Through the review of the monitored data and the interview with the PPs during on-site
assessment, the project information of Criterion 2 in the PDD is confirmed as follows:-

The specific air consumptions (SACPJ) of the project air jet looms (JAT810) installedat ISTEM, CENTEX and Easterntex during the monitoring period are compared withthose (SACRE) of the reference air jet looms (JAT710).

As a result, the project air jet

looms showed the reduction rates (RRi,j) of more than 20% for every code.

4

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

Hence, it is concluded that the project meets Criterion 2 with a satisfactory result during
the monitoring period.
Regarding the monitoring period, JQA raised CL 03 and the issue was resolved as explainedin “Findings”.
<Findings>< CL 03 >The PPs are requested to clarify why the monitoring period of 2017 is interrupted on
17/12/2017 in Table 1 of MRS.
< Resolution by the PPs >The monitoring period for 2017 was revised to 01/01/2017-31/12/2017.
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised MRS and the interview with the PPs thatthe monitoring period for 2017 was not interrupted on 17/12/2017 but continued up to
31/12/2017.

Accordingly, the duration of this monitoring period for 2017 and 2018 is revised

01/01/2017-30/09/2018. Thus, CL 03 is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the implementation and the operation of the proposed project are incompliance with two eligibility criteria of the applied methodology ID_AM011 during thismonitoring period.

C.2. Assessment of the project implementation against the registered PDD or any approved
revised PDD<Means of verification>
JQA has assessed the status of the project implementation against the registered PDD
through the review of the relevant documents, on-site inspection and interviews with the PPs.
The project is implemented by the project participants of PT. Indonesia Synthetic Textile
Milles (ISTEM), PT. Easterntex and PT. Century Textile Industry Tbk. (CENTEX) from
Republic of Indonesia and Toray Industries, Inc. from Japan.

5

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

The assessment results are summarized as follows;[Physical features of the project]
The project participants of PT. Indonesia Synthetic Textile Milles (ISTEM), PT. Easterntex
and PT. Century Textile Industry Tbk. (CENTEX) have replaced the existing weaving looms(JAT710) with the latest air-saving looms (Toyota JAT810) to reduce CO2 emission fromelectricity consumption of air compressor.

Ninety-six units of the latest air-saving looms in

total have been installed at 3 sites of the textile factory (16 units at ISTEM, 17 units at CENTEX
and 63 units at Easterntex).

Toyota JAT 810 is able to reduce air consumption for weftinsertion by more than 15% compared to the existing model (JAT 710). The installation of
the equipment complies with the description of the registered PDD.
JQA confirms through the on-site inspection and the interview with the PPs for the first
verification that the physical features of the project are in place and the PPs have implemented
the project as per the registered PDD.
[Monitoring points]
One monitoring parameter described below is measured by the meter in accordance withthe monitoring plan.
1.

APPJ,i,j,p : Amount of fabric woven by the project air jet loom type i at the project
factory j during the period p [m/p]
It is confirmed through the on-site inspection and interview with the PPs that the meter islocated at the right position of production line to measure the amount of fabric woven produced.
The measured amount is recorded manually on the inspecting sheet every production lot at
ISTEM and CENTEX or automatically transmitted to the server of the data monitoring system
at Easterntex.

The data is double-checked by a responsible staff on a monthly basis to preventthe missing of data.

Detailed information on the monitoring data of these parameters is

described in Section C.4.
[Monitoring structure]
The monitoring structure has been established and the roles and responsibilities of thepersonnel are consistent with the description in Monitoring Structure Sheet.

The staff training

for operation, monitoring and maintenance of the system was conducted in January andFebruary 2014.
It is confirmed through the review of relevant documents and the interview with the PPsthat the monitoring activity has been appropriately implemented during the monitoring period,6

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

in line with the monitoring plan of the registered PDD.
Regarding the specification of the meter at Easterntex factory, JQA raised CL 02 and theissue was resolved as explained in “Findings”.
<Findings>< CL 02 >The PPs are requested to provide the specification of meter installed at the monitoring point
1 at Easterntex factory.

.

< Resolution by the PPs >Easterntex doesn't use the meter for measuring fabric woven length.

The length isdisplayed automatically by the monitor display.
< Assessment by the TPE >The air jet loom installed at at Easterntex factory has a built-in measuring system for the
production of fabric woven, instead of using meter.

As the number of weft per inch of thefabric woven is previously designed and controlled by JAT810 according to the type of thecategory, the length of the fabric woven produced can be measured automatically by counting
the total number of the weft during the operation.

It is confirmed through the review of therelevant document and the interview with the PPs that the production of fabric woven is
automatically measured by the built-in measuring system of JAT810 and can be read on thedisplay panel.

Thus, CL 02 is closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the project has been implemented in accordance with the registered
PDD during the monitoring period, and no changes are found from the description of theregistered PDD.

C.3. Compliance of calibration frequency and correction of measured values with related
requirements<Means of verification>
The measuring equipment used in the project activity is meter (Model MS3: 1-5) made by
Kori Seiki MFG Co., Ltd.
The calibration of the meter is not required as per the methodology ID_AM011 whichstates that the fabric is a commercial commodity under contract with a client and is subject
7

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

to an accurate measurement.
<Findings>
No issue was identified.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA confirms that the calibration of the meter to measure the amount of fabric woven is
not required as per the methodology ID_AM011.

Therefore, no correction of the measured

value is required.

C.4. Assessment of data and calculation of GHG emission reductions<Means of verification>
JQA has assessed the data and calculation of GHG emission reductions achieved by the
project activity as follows:(a) The corresponding Monitoring Report Sheet of the applied methodology has been used;
Through the review of the monitoring report for the project which is titled as JCM_
ID015_MRS-draft_ver4.1.xlsx, it is confirmed that the Monitoring Report Sheets(MRS(input) 2017, MRS(calc_process) 2017, MRS(input) 2018 and MRS(calc_process)2018) of applied methodology ID_AM011 are appropriately used.
(b) A complete set of data for the monitoring period for all parameters monitored ex post wasprovided to the verification team in the form of several kinds of files.
Monitoring Report Sheet (MRS) provided by the PPs contains a complete set of themonitored data on the amount of fabric woven during the monitoring period of 01/01/2017 30/09/2018. The data are separately provided for each year of 2017 and 2018.

It isconfirmed through the review of the monitored data that the amount of fabric woven is fully
provided for the monitoring period.
(c) Information provided in the monitoring report has been checked with sources such as plant
logbooks, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analysis;
JQA has reviewed the correctness of monitored data given in the MRS for the amount of
fabric woven through cross-checking it with the monthly data provided by the PPs.

8

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

Parameters
APPJ,i,j,p(m/p)

Monitored values
ISTEM
1,248,104 (2017)
1,311,991 (2018)
CENTEX
1,585,282 (2017)
1,031,844 (2018)
Easterntex
10,709,697 (2017)
7,453,725 (2018)

Method to check values in the monitoring reportwith sources
The value of fabric woven in the MRS is crosschecked with monthly data.

It is confirmed through the cross-check of the monitored data in the MRS with the monthly
data that the values of fabric woven production in the MRS for ISTEM, CENTEX andEasterntex are fully consistent with the sum of their monthly data, and reference emissions(REj,p), project emissions (PEj,p) and emission reductions (ERj,p) in the MRS are correctly
calculated.
(d) Any assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified;Through the review of the MRS and the interview with the PPs, it is confirmed that noassumption has been used in the calculations of emission reductions and hence no justificationis required.
(e) Appropriate emission factors, default values, and other reference values have been correctly
applied.
Through the review of the MRS and the interview with the PPs, it is confirmed that CO2
emission factor for consumed electricity (EFelec,j), specific electricity consumption of the aircompressor (SECj), specific air consumption of the project air jet loom (SACPJ,i,j) and reduction
rate of specific air consumption of the project air jet loom (RRi,j) which were determined at thetime of validation and provided in the MPS, have been correctly applied in the calculation ofreference emissions.
The data monitored and required for verification and issuance is to be kept and archived
electronically for two years after the final issuance of credits.
Regarding the correctness of values for APPJ,i,j,p j in “Prod qtty” files and in Table 1 of the
MRS, JQA raised CAR 01, CAR 02 and CL 01 and these issues were resolved as explained in“Findings”.
<Findings>
9

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1< CAR 01 >As for the values of APPJ,I,j,p in May and June 2018 for ISTEM and Feb, Mar, May, July
2017, Jan, Feb, Mar and Apr 2018 for CENTEXT, these values in TTL sheet are not consistent
with those values in their monthly data.
< Resolution by the PPs >There were some mistakes in the calculation.
formula in EXCLE file.

As countermeasure, we change referring

The following revised data files were provided by the PPs:2017 Prod qtty (CTX) ver2-R.xlsx,
2017 Prod qtty (ETX) ver2.xlsx,
2017 Prod qtty (ISTEM) ver2.xlsx,
2018 Prod qtty (CTX) Jan to Sep ver2.xlsx,
2018 Prod qtty (ETX) Jan to Sep ver2.xlsx,
2018 Prod qtty (ISTEM) Jan to Sep ver2-R.xlsx< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised data files and MRS that the values of
APPJ,i,j,p in the data files of CENTEX, ISTEM and Easterntex are correctly re-calculated andaccordingly the values of APPJ,i,j,p in MRS are appropriately revised.

Thus, CAR 01 is closed.

< CAR 02 >The values of APPJ,I,j,p for ISTEM and CENTEX in Table 1 of MRS are mistakenly inputted
into the wrong cells (Cell D17, 18).
< Resolution by the PPs >The revised MRS was provided by the PPs.
< Assessment by TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised MRS that the values of APPJ,i,j,p for ISTEM
and CENTEX in Table 1 of MRS are correctly inputted into the right cells.

Thus, CAR 02 is

closed.
< CL 01 >There are inconsistencies in the values of fabric woven length between the inspection sheet
and the calculation sheet of ISTEM.

The PPs are requested to cross-check these data in May

and June 2018 for ISTEM and Feb 2017, Mar 2018 for CENTEX.

10

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1< Resolution by the PPs >As a result of cross-checking the length of fabric woven in the monthly data files of ISTEM
and CENTEX with their inspection sheet, some inconsistencies were found and accordingly
the data were corrected.
Errata.xlsx).

The result is summarized in the spreadsheet (File name: Prod Qty

Based on the result, MRS is also revised.

< Assessment by the TPE >JQA requested the PPs to cross-check the amount of fabric woven in May and June 2018
for ISTEM and Feb 2017 and Mar 2018 for CENTEX with their inspection sheet which are
randomly selected by a sampling.

As a result of cross-checking, the error ratio was 1.44% for

ISTEM and 0.94% for CENTEX, which corresponds to 0.1% and 0%, respectively, of theemission reductions.

It is confirmed through the review of the revised monthly data that theseerror ratios are much smaller than 5% of the materiality threshold for verification, which isrequested by the paragraph 101 of JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification (JCM_ID_
GL_VV_ver01.0) and therefore the values of APPJ,i,j,p in MRS are free from the material errors.
Thus, CL 01 is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the monitored data and the project-specific parameters fixed ex-ante
are appropriately and correctly applied in the calculation of GHG emission reductions achievedby the project activity, in accordance with the applied methodology ID_AM011 and themonitoring plan of the registered PDD.

C.5. Assessment of avoidance of double registration<Means of verification>
It is confirmed that a written confirmation from the PPs regarding no registration under otherinternational climate mitigation mechanisms was provided at the time of validation and thedeclaration letter signed by the PP’s representative in the MoC was submitted to the Joint
Committee.

In addition, it is re-confirmed through the check of the relevant website and theinterview with PPs that the project has not been registered under any other mechanisms at thetime of verification.
<Findings>
No issues was identified.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
11JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

JQA concludes that the project has not been registered under other international climate
mitigation mechanisms.

C.6. Post registration changes<Means of verification>
It is confirmed through the review of documents and the on-site assessment that the project
has not been changed from the registered PDD and/or methodology.
<Findings>
No issue was identified.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the project has not been changed from the registered PDD and/or
methodology.

D. Assessment of response to remaining issues
An assessment of response to the remaining issues including FARs from the validation and/or
previous verification period, if appropriate
No issues including FAR from the validation are remained.

As this is the first verification,

no issues from the previous verification are also remained.

E. Verified amount of emission reductions achieved
Year
2013

Verified
Reference Verified Project Emissions Verified
Emission
Emissions (tCO2e)(tCO2e)Reductions (tCO2e)
-

2014

-

-

-

2015

-

-

-

2016

-

-

-

2017

2,977.4

2,254.0723

2018

2,148.6

1,627.2

521

2019

-

-

-

12

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

2020

-

-

Total (tCO2e)
Note:

1,244

The verified emission reductions in each year are rounded down after the decimal point.

F. List of interviewees and documents received
F.1. List of interviewees(CENTEX)- Kastuya Okajima

Production Director, PT. CENTEX- Fatkhurrohman

Deputy Factory Manager, PT. CENTEX- Wahyana

Spinning & Weaving General Manager, PT CENTEX- Amri Sety C

Weaving Manager, PT. CENTEX- Satoshi Kojima

Senior staff, Toray Industries Inc.

- Tsuyoshi Nakao

Team Leader, ERM(ISTEM)- Masaru Kimura

Production Director, PT. ISTEM- Wilman

Assistant Manager QC, PT. ISTEM- Taofik I.

Assistant Manager MTC, PT. ISTEM- Agung R.

Department Manager, PT. ISTEM- Satoshi Kojima

Senior staff, Toray Industries Inc.

- Tsuyoshi Nakao

Team Leader, ERM

F.2. List of documents received
1.

JCM Project Design Document (ID015) _ver3.0, 31/07/2018

2.

Monitoring Spreadsheet: JCM_ID015_MRS_draft_ver4.1.xlsx, (Monitoring period:
01/01/2017 - 30/09/2018)

3.

JCM Validation Report (ID015), 20/03/2018

4.

JCM Modalities of Communication Statement Form (ID011) (JCM_ID_F_MoC_
ver01.0)

5.

JCM Approved Methodology JCM_ID_AM011_ver1.0

6.

JCM Glossary of Terms (JCM_ID_Glossary_ver02.0)

7.

JCM Project Cycle Procedure (JCM_ID_PCP_ver05.0)

8.

JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring Report(JCM_ID_GL_PDD_MR_ver03.0)

9.

JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification (JCM_ID_GL_VV_ver01.0)

10.

JCM Verification Report Form (JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1)

13

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

11.

Revised monthly data report on the amount of fabric woven during the monitoring
period for ISTEM, CENTEX and Easterntex- 2017 Prod qtty (ISTEM) ver2.xlsx- 2017 Prod qtty (CTX) ver2-R.xlsx- 2017 Prod qtty (ETX) ver2.xlsx- 2018 Prod qtty (ISTEM) Jan to Sep ver2.xlsx- 2018 Prod qtty (CTX) Jan to Sep ver2.xlsx- 2018 Prod qtty (ETX) Jan to Sep ver2.xlsx

12. Technical characteristics of the latest air jet loom JAT810 made by Toyota Industries
Corporation
13-1. Air consumption data of JAT810 and JAT710 for various categories prepared by Toyota
Industries Corporation
13-2. Report on the sub-nozzle jet characteristics of air jet loom, Textile Machinery Societyof Japan, p.39, vol.68
14-1. Maintenance manual of JAT810
14-2. Disassembly and installation manual of JAT810
14-3. Operation manual of JAT810
15-1. Agenda of local stakeholder consultation meeting held on 29/09/2016
15-2. “Installation of energy saving air jet loom at textile factory” presented at LSC meeting
16-1. Record on staff training of JAT810 conducted at CENTEX and Easterntex
16-2. Standard operational procedure of JAT810
17-1. Schematic diagram of monitoring structure at ISTEM
17-2. Schematic diagram of monitoring structure at CENTEX
17-3. Schematic diagram of monitoring structure at Easterntex
18.

Inspection record of turbo compressor (TRE50-560kW)

19-1. Catalogue of meter (MS3:1-5) made by Kori Seiki MFG Co. Ltd.
19-2. Specification of the meter (MS3:1-5)
20.

Inspecting sheet for amount of fabric woven production

21.

Determination of SAC and RR

22.

Determination of SEC

23.

Result of cross-checking of APPJ,i,j,p for ISTEM and CENTEX (Prod Qty Errata.xlsx)

14

JCM_ID_F_Vrf_Rep_ver01.1

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s verification team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers.
Statement of competenceStatement of competence
Name:

Name:

Dr. Tadashi Yoshida

Dr. Irhan FebijantoQualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Function

Function

Date of qualification

Date of qualification
Validator

2014/12/22

Validator (JCM project only)

Verifier

2014/12/22

Verifier (JCM project only)

Team leader

2014/12/22

Team leader

2017/8/21
2017/8/21-

T echnical area within sectoral scopes

T echnical area within sectoral scopes

Date of qualification

Date of qualification
TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2014/12/22

TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

TA 1.2. Renewables

2014/12/22

TA 1.2. Renewables

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2014/12/22

TA 3.1. Energy demand

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production

2015/11/12

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production-

TA 4.6. Other manufacturing industries

2014/12/22

TA 4.6. Other manufacturing industries-

TA 5.1. Chemical industry

2014/12/22

TA 5.1. Chemical industry-

TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas

2014/12/22

TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas-

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater

2014/12/22

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater-

TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation-

TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation-

Statement of competence
Name:

Ms. Sachiko Hashizume

Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Function
Date of qualification
Validator

2015/11/20

Verifier

2015/11/20

Team leader

2018/6/22

Technical area within sectoral scopes
Date of qualification
TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2015/11/20

TA 1.2. Renewables

2015/11/20

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2015/11/20

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production-

TA 4.6. Other manufacturing industries-

TA 5.1. Chemical industry-

TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas
TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater
TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation

2015/11/20-

15

2014/12/22
2014/12/22