International Atomic Energy Agency
fct

DTDC(NDS)-77
D i s t r . G+ Sp.

C3

CO

I

IN DC

!\J

O

•d
2!
tl

INTERNATIONAL

NUCLEARDATA

COMMITTEE

Report on theSecond Consultants' Meetingon
Charged Particle Uuclear Data (CPNI)) Compilation

CD
CD
c+

M-

3

ON

Vienna, 28-30 April I976

Edited by 0. Schwerer

October 1976
IAEA NUCLEAR DATA SECTION, KARNTNER RING 11, A-1010 VIENNAReproduced lay the IAEA in Austria
November 1976
76-9577

INDC(NPS)-77
Distr. G+Sp.

Report on theSecond Consultants' Meetingon
Charged Particle Nuclear Data (CPND) Compilation

Edited "by 0. Schwerer
October 1976

Table of Contents
Page
Introduction. 5

Agenda7

List of Participants

9

List of Abbreviations

11

Minutes

13

Resolution

23

Centres and groups active in compilation or disseminationof CPND
Required formats for transmission of magnetic tapes

24. . . . 26

Scope of activities in experimental data compilation,
bibliography and evaluations

27

Actions

29

Conclusions about the generalized Exfor system

33

Annexes1.

Status Report of LUaF

39

2-. Status Report of CAJaD

49

3.

KACHAPAG Information No. 1 (Memo CP-B/l)

53

4.

Status Report of IBJ

67

5.

Status Report of the Japanese Study Group

69

6.

S t a t u s Report of NDS

71

7.

L e t t e r from Dr. Agrawal, India

75

8.

The ZAED proposal for a CPND bibliography

79

9.

The MCSC proposal for a CPND bibliography

81

10.

Memo CP-£/l (Dr. Ohnuma's proposals concerning CPND
Exfor)

85

11.

Memo CP-E/2 (Sample e n t r i e s by Dr. Ohnuma)

87

12.

Memo CP-c/l (concerning CPND Exfor d i c t i o n a r i e s ) . . . .

91

Introduction

The Second Consultants' Meeting on Charged-Particle Nuclear Data
Compilation was held at the IAEA, Vienna, on 28 - 30 April 1976,
immediately following the twelfth annual meeting of the Pour Neutron
Nuclear Data Centers on 26—28 April 1976. Both meetings were closely
related due to the discussions on the Exfor system commonly used forthe exchange of both data types, and most of the participants of thefirst of the two meetings stayed for the second. Both meetings together can be regarded therefore as the First Consultants' Meeting of
Nuclear Reaction Data Centres - though photo-nuclear reaction data
were not a topic of the meeting.

The present document contains the minutes of the meeting on
charged—particle nuclear data; the minutes of the preceding neutron
data meeting are contained in the document INDC(NDS)—78. Both
documents include all the decisions on the Exfor system disregardingfrom which of the two meetings they resulted.

AGENM

1.

Opening, election of chairman, adoption of agenda

2.

Progress since last meeting:brief status reports of data centres and groups

3*

Cooperation scheme
3«1. scope of activities ina) experimental data compilationb) bibliographyc) evaluations
3.2

4»

master files

Bibliographic data index
4.1

computer file and publication

4.2

nuclear data and INIS

5»

Generalized Exfor

6.

Customer services

7«

Network communications

8.

Next meeting

Second CPIffl Meeting
Vienna, 28-30 April 1976
List of Participants

H, Behrens
F.E. Chukreev
L.L. Sckolovskij
G, Dearnaley
G. Erdtman

ZAED Karlsruhe
CAJaD Moscow

Germany, Fed. Rep
USSR

Harwell
KFA Julich
L eningrad-Gat chi na

UK
Germany, Fed. Rep
USSR» L. Lesca
A. Schofield

IJIfjJse Saclay

NEA

V.N. Manokhin
V.G. Pronjaev

CJD Obninsk

USSR

IBJ Warsaw

PolandKFK Karlsruhe

Germany, Fed. Rep

Tokyo Inst. of Tech.
M C S C Brookhaven

Japan

State Comm. Bucharest
JAERI

RomaniaJapan

I.A. Kondurov

A. Marcinkowski
H. Munzel
F. Kronen'oerger
H. Ohnuma
Gi S. Pearlstein
C.L. Dunford, Chairman
N.E. Holden5) S. Rapeanu
T. Tamura
IAEA, NDS

Mrs. P.M. Attree
M.A. Khali1, part-time
Mrs. G. Lammer, Local Secretary
H.D. Lemmel, Scientific Secretary
R. Lessler, part-time& A. Loronz
K. Okamoto, part-time
Gi J.J. Schmidt
0. Schwerer, Local Secretary
M. Vlasov, part-time
IAEA, THIS Section
V. Gadjokov, part-time

USA

11
List of Abbreviations used in this Document
CAJaD

Centr po dannym o stroenii atomnogo jadra i jadernykh
reakcikh GKAE CCCP (Center for nuclear structure andreaction data of the USSR State Committee of the
Utilization of Atomic Energy) at the Kurchatov Institute,
Moscow.

CCDN

Centre de Compilation de Donne'es Neutroniques; same as NDCC.

CINDA

A specialized bibliography and data index on neutron nuclear
data operated jointly by NNCSC, NDCC, NDS and CJD. The
master file is maintained at NDCC. Publications are madeby IAEA.

CINISUA catalogue of numerical data libraries available from NDS.

CJD

Centr po Jadernym Dannym, the USSR Nuclear Data Center at
P.E.I. Obninsk.

CPND

Charged-particle nuclear reaction data.

EXPOR

Exchange Format, i n i t i a l l y developed for the international
exchange of neutron nuclear data.
Instytut Badari Jadrowych (institute of Nuclear Research),

IBJ

Warsaw.
INDC
INIS
Japanese

International Nuclear Data Committee.
International Nuclear Information System, a bibliographic
system operated by the IAEA.
Study Group
*
• r+•
•
•
-,
v •
J.
r _. ,-»
study group for
information
processing
innuclearphysics
atthe Tokyo Institute of Technology.

JAERI

Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute.

JNDCJapanese Nuclear Data Committee

KACHAPAG
LUaP

Karlsruhe Charged Particle Group, Germany Fed. Rep.
Leningradskij Institut Jadernoj Fiziki, Ak. Nauk SSSR
(Leningrad Institute of Nuclear Physics, USSR Acad.Sci.).

NDCC

Neutron Data Compilation Centre (Centre de Compilation deDonne'es Neutroniques - CCDN) of the QECD Nuclear Energy
Agency, at Saclay near Paris.

NDP

Nuclear Data Project at Oak Ridge for nuclear structureand decay data.

NDS

IAEA Nuclear Data Section, Vienna.

12

NNCSC

USA National Neutron Gross—Section Center at the Brookhaven
National Laboratory, Upton, N.Y.

NND

Neutron Nuclear Reaction Data.

NRDP

Nuclear Reaction Data File System developed Toy theJapanese Study Group.
The bibliography of the Oak Ridge CPND group, now mergedwith the Oak Ridge Nuclear Data Project. Published in"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables".

"Reaction List""Recent References" The bibliography of the Oak Ridge Nuclear Data Project for
nuclear structure data, including many references on CPND.
Published in "Nuclear Data Sheets".
ZAED

Zentralstelle fur Atomkernenergie Dokumentation (documentation
center for atomic energy) at Karlsruhe.

13
Minutes2"

Consultants' Meeting on Charged Particle Nuclear Data Compilation
Vienna, 28-30 April 1976

1»

Opening, election of chairman, adoption of agenda

Prof. Glubrecht opens the meeting on behalf of the Director
General of the IAEA., stressing the importance of data in general andthe strongly increasing interest in CPND in particular. The IAEA
appreciates very much the large number of participants .
The fact
that USA, West and East Europe, USSR and Japan are well represented at
this meeting, is an indication for the well working international cooperation in nuclear data.
Mr. Schmidt thanks Prof. Glubrecht for the introduction andfor his strong support of the NDS1 program and the organization of thismeeting.
Mr. Lemmel introduces the participants.
Mr. Dunford is elected as chairman.
The Agenda is adopted as given on page 7«

2.

Progress since last meeting:Brief status reports of data centers and groups

Mr. Kondurov reports on the LUaP Data Centre at Leningrad. See
Annex 1. The Leningrad Data Center was created some years ago to supply
nuclear data for fundamental investigations. LHaP is compiling Soviet references in HDP format ("Recent References" system) in cooperation with
CAJaD.
Mr. Sokolovskij reports on the activities of CAJaD. See Annex 2.
CAJaD, the leading organization in compilation, evaluation and dissemination of nuclear data in the USSR, has put all actions from the last CPND
meeting into effect. Free exchange of experimental and evaluated data andeasy access to the literature of interest are considered as basis for scientific work. This access can be reached in the best way by an international
bibliographic reference file using the Oak Ridge NDP keyword system.
Mr. Muenzel reports on the KACHAPAG activities. The Karlsruhegroup continues to improve the EX70R format; to change the entries already available according to the recommendations of the last meeting; itsroutine compilation, so that now about 300 reactions are available on magnetic tape. A first KACHAPAG Information Letter on CPND (see Annex 3) was
issued in March 1976.

14
Minutes
Mr. Pearlstein appreciates the efforts of KACHAPAG to constructively improve the neutron EXPOR instead of creating a new system
for CPND.
Mr. Lesca reports that CCDN is so far and in the near future
not involved in compilation of CPND. The extend of participation of
CCDN is not yet decided; no new activity will start within the next
year. Howeverf CCDN is willing to participate in the distribution of
CPND.
Mr. Dearnaley reports on planned activities of Harwell. The
Harwell group plans to compile differential CPND (secondary energy
distributions) as needed for surface investigations and would like tocooperate with other groups within an international network. For thehandling of magnetic tapes it is hoped to find help within the United
Kingdom.
Mr. Rapeanu reports on the data activities of the State Committee for Nuclear Energy, Bucharest. The Romanian group has only
started its activity. 2 libraries are maintained: DANEX for experimental neutron data in a format compatible with EXPOR, and DANEM for evaluated microscopic neutron data. No CPND activity is planned for thetime being.
Mr. Erdtmann reports that the Kernforschungsanlage Juelich ismainly interested to know how to obtain CPND for applications in radioanalytical chemistry, in particular activation analysis. The Juelich
Library of gamma-lines of radionuclides is based on a large number ofcharged—particle induced reactions. Since no own data group exists, nocompilation of CPND is planned.
Mr. Marcinkowski reports on the activities of IBJ, Warsaw. See
Annex 4. The activity was started a few months ago with the compilationof (p, gamma) reaction data. With respect to bibliography IBJ relies on
the "Reaction List" and the "Recent References". It is intended to store
resonance energies, other resonance characteristics and energies and intensities of most intensive gamma rays.
Mr. Ohnuma reports on the activities of the Japanese Study Group.
See Annex *5. Summary: Regular contact to the JAERI group has been established. The description of NRDP-1 (Nuclear Reaction Data Pile) has been
distributed among potential users in Japan, and NRDP-2, an actually working system compatible with EXPOR, is being discussed. For this purposean analysis of EXPOR has been made.

15
Minutes

Mr. Tamura from JAERI explains the present activities of the JNDC(JAERI Nuclear Data Committee), which is a standing committee of JAERI
and the Atomic Energy Society of Japan.
In the discussion it was clarified that, in addition to the longexisting JMDC, another Nuclear Data Committee has been newly formed within
the Nuclear Physics Division of the Physical Society of Japan. Bothcommittees are in contact Taut are independent of each other. Whereas thedata activities of JNDC aim primarily at data evaluation for the nuclear
energy program, the new committee is primarily interested in data forbasic nuclear sciences.
Mr. Holden reports on the CPND activities in the USA:
"Effective 1 October 1976, the responsibility for charged
particle data compilation and evaluation and customer services will be transferred to the National Neutron Cross
Section Center at Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Initially there will be a staff of two physicists who will
be responsible for maintaining a bibliography for integral
CPND, for compiling experimental data as described at the
September Consultants Meeting and evaluation of CPND forbiomedical, fusion, neutron source and inverse reactions
related to neutron reactions.
The Reaction List file and publication will cease with theannual publication for 1975* A final cumulative publication
may be published. Coverage of the entire nuclear physics
literature will be continued via Recent References."
The first KACHAPAG magnetic tape was recently received andcould be indexed by BNCSC. UNCSC will try to improve the Oak Ridge
keyword system in order to extract the CPND information.
Mr. Manokhin reports on CJD. No compilation of CPND is planned,
but CJD is interested in information on CPND for evaluation purposes.
Mr. Lemmel reports on NDS. He refers to the report given at
the Neutron Data Centres Meeting (see Annex 6). The NDS activities on
CPND will concentrate on- holding consultants1 meetings of the CPND centers- guiding the development of the CPND Exfor system (dictionaries,
rules, etc.)- supporting the exchange of CPND Exfor tapes and disseminate CPND
to requestors in the NDS service area
- keeping contact with centers and groups trying to enlarge thenumber of coworkers within the CPND cooperation.

16
Minutes
CPND compilation cannot be done at NDS due to lack of manpower.
Mr. Lemmel reads out a letter from Mr. Agrawal, India, who plans tocompile (d,d) and (d,p) stripping cross sections and polarizations (seeAnnex T)»
Mr. Behrens reports on ZAED which is prepared to produce a CPND
bibliography (see Annex 8 ) .
Note: Some detailed proposals submitted to the meeting (see Annex 8)
can be considered as partly superseded since ZAED wants to avoid duplicationof effort with NNCSC (see item 4.1 of the agenda).
3.

Cooperation scheme

3.1

Scope of activities

The scope of experimental data compilation, bibliographic andevaluation activities of the centres and groups represented are discussed.
A summary is given on page 27» written proposals concerning especiallythe bibliographic file are submitted by ZAED (Annex 8, partly superseded)and by NNCSC (Annex 9). During the discussion it was suggested that ZAED
investigate the use of INIS for retrieving CPHD references in particularfor integral CFKD. (Action l).
Mr. Chukreev presents 3 magnetic tapes containing all bibliographic
information on Soviet literature in "Recent References" format covering thetime period from 1971 to 1975* Action 3 of the last CPND meeting is herewith
fulfilled. But it was mentioned that parts of these tapes will require
some corrections.
On request of Mr. Muenzel, Mr. Ohnuma agrees to look for a
person in Japan who is interested in compiling CPND for the input inthe KACHAPAG file (Action 2 ) .
Mr. Behrens reports on the "compilation of data compilations"
to be issued by ZAED (according to Action 12 of the last CPND meeting).
It will include all printed compilations of physical (not only nuclear)data, but no data libraries available only on magnetic tape. Those will
be collected by NDS. The ZAED compilation is now being printed and willprobably be published in June. A supplement is foreseen for the end of
this year. (Note by editor: see H.Behrens, G.Ebel, Phvsik Daten,ZAED
3-1 1076.)
It is agreed that all centers will scan the ZAED compilation
for completeness and send their suggested additions to ZAED for inclusion in the supplement. (Action 2a)
Mr. Lorenz says that the NDS project in this field was only
started but did not progress very much due to limited manpower. For anarrower scope NDS can refer to the recently issued CINDU-11. (Note by ed.:see A.Lorenz,Comp.&Eval.of Nucl.Struct.&Decay Data, INDC(NDS)-80,Sept.76)
There was an Action of the last CPND meeting (No. 11 on NDS)
to supply the CPND compilation groups with a list of CPND reactions
needed for fusion. Since the list is just being prepared, this Action
is continuing. (Action 3)

17
Minutes

3.2

Master files

The problem where the CPND master files will be stored is discussed.
The meeting agrees that the master file for integral data will be maintainedby KACHAPAG which will take full responsibility for these entries. Concerning differential data, it will be investigated whether Japan and USSR
will send differential and integral CPND on separate tapes or KACHAPAG
will extract the; integral CPND from a mixed-mode tape by "REACTION" codes(Action 4 ) .
Mr. Muenzel offers also to store the differential data in the
KACHAPAG master file, but without taking the responsibility for these entries.
The meeting decides that this problem needs further discussion
and all centres are asked to prepare proposals for the next CPND meeting(Action *5)»

4.

Bibliographic data index

4«1Computer file and publication

Mr. Dunford opens the discussion asking whether in addition tothe "Recent References" a CINDA-type file is needed. Such a file would bedata-oriented and probably more convenient for use in applied science.
Several participants stress the needs for a CINDA-type bibliography, inparticular for integral CPND;on the other hand "Recent References" is also needed, especially also for possible future extensions of the datacompilation scope. Since it is possible to derive a reaction index from"Recent references", it is agreed that NNCSC should investigate the possibilities of making available a cumulative reaction index for integral anddifferential CPND (Recommendation).
Mr. Dunford presents the NNCSC proposal for a CPND bibliography,
see Annex 9. Summary: Starting with October 1976 NNCSC will assume full
responsibility for the compilation of a CINDA—type CPND bibliography for
integral data (excitation functions to ground and metastable states andthick target yields). The file structure will closely follow the present
neutron CINDA. NNCSC will scan all journals listed in the Annex and perform completeness checks by comparison with INIS retrievals. Initially,
NNCSC will supply printed copies of an annual cumulative bibliography cost
free to the distribution centres.

18
MinutesMr. Behrens explains the ZAED proposal for a CPND bibliography(Annex 8). The proposal consists of a handbook in INIS format for the
new literature and a cumulative bibliography for the years before 1976.
The meeting agrees that NNCSC should carry out its proposal(Action 6). First priority will be given to the publications listed,second priority to laboratory reports, and third priority to progress
reports and other informal publications.
All CPND service centers will provide NNCSC with an estimateof the required number of copies of the CPND bibliography (Action 8).
It is also agreed that USSR continue supplying CPND bibliography
in "Recent References" format.
Japan will try to provide the input of Japanese CPND literaturein "Recent References" format.
With respect to the literature before 1976, the meeting asks
ZAED to publish, if possible, in early 1977 a cumulative bibliographyof integral CPND derived from the McGowan list (corresponding to thelast part of the ZAED proposal given in Annex 8) and to investigate
the costs and the mechanism of distribution (Action 7)»
Mr. Behrens agrees to this proposal and withdraws the remaining
part of his proposal given in Annex 8.

4.2

Nuclear data and INIS

Mr. Gadjokov from the INIS Section of the IAEA reports on the
INIS system and on the "Technical Committee Meeting on the Treatmentof Nuclear Data Sources in INIS" held on 1-2 April 1976 in Vienna. The
purpose of this meeting was to improve cooperation and coordination
between INIS and existing or planned nuclear data services, with special
emphasis on data "flagging" and "tagging" in INIS. NDS is asked to distribute the minutes of this meeting to all data centers (Action 9 ) .
In the following discussion several participants report experiences in using INIS retrievals as a source for nuclear data references. In particular the large output of inappropriate references ismentioned several times; the ratio "useful information"/"noise" in thecase of integral CPND, was only 1:3. It was also mentioned that thisratio is not much better for the more specialized Reference List of
McGowan, which also has insufficient retrieval facilities to separate
integral from differential CPND.

19
Minutes
Mr. Gadjokov explains that these unsatisfactory results aremainly due to the fact that INIS is not yet adequate as a source fornuclear data references; on the other hand some of the noise may becaused by inappropriate use of the INIS retrieval system or because of
inexact or incomplete indexing by the respective national INIS indexers.
The IAEA INIS Section can perform only random checks of the input but
can not enforce the observation of the indexing rules. For specific extractions from the INIS file the participants may apply primarily to theirnational INIS liaison officers.

5.

Generalized Exfor

The coding of reactions and "quantities" in the REACTION formalism has been proven to be practicable. It was also considered anessential contribution to the further development of the Exfor system.
This was demonstrated by the fact that also the neutron data centersintend to change over, after some transition period, from the earlier
ISO-QUANT formalism to the REACTION formalism.
The discussions were based on papers by
Muenzel (KACHAPAG Information 1 = CP-B/1, see Annex 3)
Ohnuma (CP-E/l and CP-E/2, see Annexes 10 and 11)
Dunford (CP-C/l, see Annex 12)*)*)

The resulting conclusions can be found on pages 33-38 • Dueto the overlap with the Exfor conclusions found at the preceding meetingof the neutron data centers, all Exfor conclusions are attached andgrouped in three sections:for CPND
for NND and CPND
for NND only.

Resulting actions concerning the generalized Exfor format can befound on page 30. (Actions 10-25)*) Note: These papers had not officially been distributed as formal
CP-Memos but are referred to elsewhere under CP-Memo codes.

20
Minutes6.

Customer services

Several details concerning the customer services were alreadymentioned under other agenda items. In addition, the following statements
are given:
Mr. Muenzel: KACHAPAG will publish a kind of handbook of the data
available from the KACHAPAG file and also provide copies of the master file
to CAJaD, NDS, CCDN, Japan and ZAED. Requests will be treated by ZAED.
The data will be provided in form of graphs and of tables but no condensed
computation format containing only the values is planned.
Mr. Muenzel requests from NDS to adapt the existing Exfor checkprogram to the new CPND formalisms. He points out that it should be thefunction of the IAEA to provide the centers which, use the Exfor systemwith the required computer programs. This would prevent both duplicationof efforts and divergent development of the check programs.
Mr. Schmidt replies that NDS can provide KACHAPAG a copy of thecheck program whenever major changes are implemented, but has at present no manpower for the development of a new CPND check program. The
NDS manpower for all CPND matters is limited to 1/2 to 1 manyear so far.
Concerning customer services, NDS has an edited EXFOR format, but not
yet a computational format.
Mr. Schofield: CCDN may be able to treat data in computational format.
Mr. Dunford: NNCSC has a format for sorting, reorganizing andplotting the data. Further developing of this program is planned forthe coming year.
The participants agree to keep the others informed about the
progress of the centre's computational formats, including plans and preliminary formats (Action 26, also continuing Action 2 from 11th 4-Centersmeeting).

7.

Network communications

The centres and groups presently cooperating in CPND are defined and to each of them a letter (A ... K) is attributed, which isused in memos (see below) and in col. 67 of Exfor entries compiled.

21
Minutes
For the list of these groups and the addresses of the respective persons of contact see page 13« In page 14 the required formats for magnetic tape transmissions and the desired form of dictionaries to be distributed by NDS are listed. NDS will communicate to the Indian groupthe results of this meeting and ask for the required tape format andthe address of the man of contact (Action 27). Harwell and IBJ will
inform NDS as soon as possible about their tape format (Action 28)«
All participants will ensure that all centres have got all
memos issued so far (Action 29). All future communication will be done
by CP memos. Their denomination will be CP-X/n, where X stands
for the issuing centre and n is a current number within the centre. No
separate CP-newsletter is planned. Any change in the centres1 CPND
programme, compared to the one defined at the meeting, will be communicated by CP-memo (Action 30).
All memos concerning EXPOR will also be communicated to CJD.
Mr. Dunford announces that NNCSC is prepared to send the bibliographic master file to everybody interested.
NDS is asked to issue a supplement to the EXF'OR and LEXPOR
manuals explaining the extensions for CPND. (Action 25)
All participants will communicate to NDS the names and addressesof persons interested in CPND activities for the creation of a distribution list of CPND documents (Action 31). This list will include measurers and users of CPND.
KACHAPAG will prepare a revision of their "Information No. 1"(Action 32) according to the agreements of this meeting.
The question of inclusion of photonuclear data in the CPND network is discussed. NNCSC will contact Mr. Puller (Action 33) and CJD
will investigate with the appropriate persons whether Soviet photonuclear
data will be included. (Action 34)
If specific needs for certain types of CFND become known, NDS
will inform data compiling centers. (Actions 3*5 and 3)
All participants will investigate and communicate whether there
are other CPND activities not yet known to the network (Action 36).
A future protocol for all nuclear data centres, similar to theprotocol for the four neutron data centres but more comprehensive, isdiscussed. The meeting feels that at present a formal protocol would
be premature* This question will be discussed again at the next CPND
meeting* The general agreements already achieved are summarized in a
resolution (page 23 ) .

22
Minutes8.

Next meeting

Proposed time for the next Pour Centres and CPHD meeting:
25-29 April, following the Kiev Conference on neutron physics. Proposed place: possibly Obninsk for the Pour Centres meeting andMoscow (Kurchatov Institute) for the CPHD meeting.

23
Resolution

In view of the fact that in many countries the support for compilationof CPND is small compared to its importance to various applications, theparticipants issued the following
RESOLUTION

The participants attending the CPND Meeting, realizing that theneeds for compilation activities for CPND have teen established repeatedly, resolved—

to promote and actively support the international cooperation efforts
to compile CPND and make them available to data users,-

to urge the funding bodies of the participating groups to continue
to support the activities of these groups on a long-term basis,-to minimize difficulties and optimize the efficiency of CPND exchangeby the adoption of common formats whenever possible,—

to urge the participating organizations to give high priority to the
responsibilities which each of the participating groups assumed within
the network operations for CPND.

24
Centers and groups active in compilation or disseminationof Charged Particle Nuclear Data.

A.

CAJaD

Dr. F.E. Chukreev
Center for Nuclear Structure & Reaction Dataof the USSR State Committee on the Utilizationof Atomic Energy
I.V. Kurchatov Institute of Atomic "Energy
Moscow, USSRB.

KACHAPAG

Prof. H. Mttnzel
Charged P a r t i c l e Nuclear Data GroupI n s t i t u t fttr Radiochemie
Kemforschungszentrum Karlsruhe
Postfach 364O
D-75 Karlsruhe, Fed. Repub. of Germany

C.

NNCSC

Dr. S. Pearlstein
Rational Neutron Cross Section Center
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Upton, L.I. N.Y. 11973, USA

D.

NDS

Dr. J.J. Schmidt
Nuclear Data Section
Div. of Research and Laboratories
IAEA, P.O.B.59O
Karntnerring 111011 Vienna

E.

Study Group for
Information
Processing in
Nucl. Physics

Prof. Hajime Tanaka
Department of Physics
Hokkaido University
Sapporo, Hokkaido
Japan

F.

HarwellDr. G. Dearnaley
Nuclear Physics Div., Hangar 8
Atomic Energy Research Establishment
Harwell, Didcot, OXON. 0X11 ORA
United Kingdom

G.

ZAED

Dr. H. Behrens
Zentralstelle fUr Atomkernenergie—Dokumentation
Kernforschungszentrum
D-7514 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen
Federal Republic of Germany

25

H.

IBJ

I.

NDCC

Dr. A. Marcinkowski
Nuclear Data GroupI n s t . Badan Jadrowych
Hoza 69
PL-OO-681 Warsaw, Poland
Dr. L. Lesca
NBA Neutron Data Compilation Centre
B.P. no. 9
F-91190 Gif-sur-Yvette
PranceDr. D.C. Agrawal
Physics Department
Banaras Hindu University
Varanasi
India 221005

Centres and groups who may eventually join the CPKD network;
Present at the meeting, out CPHD activities still in the planningstage:
Dr. S. Rapeanu

Comitetul de Stat pentru Energia Nucleara
B-dul H i e P i n t i l i e 5
Bucuresti
RomaniaInterested, but could not participate in the meeting:Dr. D. Brune
AB Atomenergi Studsvik
Fack, NykBping 1
Sweden 61101

26

Required formats for transmission of magnetic tapes and dictionaries
Centrecode».
Tape formatmFormat for dictionaryJ.
, ,_transmission by WTNDSAEBCDIC 9-track BOO bpi

tape

B

it

11

C

ii

ti

D

ii

ti

11

E

EBCDIC 9-track 1600 bpi preferred,
800 bpi acceptableP»

EBCDIC 9-track 800 or 1600 bpi

printedG(through B)(through B)

H

to be communicatedprintedI

EBCDIC 9-track 800 bpi

tape

K

to be communicatedto be communicated* information supplied by mail after the meeting

27

Charged particle activities in the
countries or centres

represented

Scope of experimental data compilation activities
KACHAPAG:

compilation of integral data, i . e . formation cross sections
and thick targets yields for ground and/or raetastable states.
targets:

ZA3

projectiles:

all starting with p—reactions

incident energies: allgeographical scope: all, except USSR.
USSR:(CAJaD and partly CD L U a P )compilation of CPND produced in USSR, mainly integral, but also
differential data (angular and secondary energy distribution).
Important older data will be compiled also and be available later.

Japan:

compilation of integral and differential CPND produced in Japanat present and in future.
Second priority will be given to all CPND produced in Japanin the past and CPND of special reaction types produced inother countries.

USA:at present, at the request of KACHAPAG,, compilation of integral
CPND produced in USA and Canada which are not available inpublished articles but only on magnetic tapes.

UK:

differential data (secondary energy distribution) as needed forsurface analysis; from past and future publications all over theworld.
targets:H
Ti
projectiles: p, d, He3, a, t (limited),, and certain heavy ions,
incident energies: ^ 5 MeV.

Poland:(p,y)data:

resonance energies, spins, parities, resonance widths,
intensities and energies of intensive y-rays;

all targets and energies, past and future publications all over theworld.
India:(d,d) and (d,p) cross sections and polarizations for all target
nuclei and energies, including angular distributions.

28b.

Bibliographic activities
NNCSC

will provide a CINDA-type file for integral CPND. This
file will contain all publications which are publishedafter 1 January 1976 and also those which contain dataexchanged in CPND Exfor. US will publish and distribute
free of cost an integral CPND bibliography to the CPNDnetwork.

IAEA

if so requested, is prepared to print and distribute abibliography.

CAJaD

with CD L U a P will regularly prepare the input for Soviet
literature on nuclear structure and decay data and nuclear
reactions for "Recent References".

Japan

can probably provide the input of Japanese literature in
H U B or "Recent References" format.

India

could probably also provide input in the same scope as theirnumerical data compilation.

ZAED

will not carry out its proposal (see Annex 8) in order toavoid duplication of efforts with NNCSC. Since there exists,
however, some request for a cumulative bibliography for theyears before 1976, ZAED will investigate the possibility ofproviding such a publication (last part of its proposal,
Action 7)« ZAED will soon decide whether this will be done andhow (costfree or at which price) the printed issue will be
distributed.

Evaluation activities
KACHAPAG:

continues the investigation of systematics of excitation
functions; at the moment the energy region near Coulomb
barrier is given highest priority. Comparison of different
calculation programmes with each other and with experimental
data.

CAJaD:

evaluation activity starting.

Japan:

no evaluations planned.

NNCSC:

a starter library of 305 nuclides has been distributed;
no definite plans to improve the library. Certain CPND will
be evaluated, the exact scope has still to be defined.

29
Actions
Actions of the CPND meeting
Actions concerning the cooperation scheme
Action No.

Action on

ActionZAED

to investigate the use of the INIS
keywords system for retrieving CPND
references,in particular for integral
CPND.
to find a person in Japan who isinterested in cooperation with theJapanese group to compile CPND for
input in the KaChaPaG file.

Ohnuma2aallto review the "Compilation ofcompilations" by ZAED, when thishas been issued, and send comments
and additions to Behrens forinclusion in the Supplement.

NDS(action 11 of Sep. 75 meeting continued)
to supply the CPND compilation groups
with a list of CPND reactions needed forfusion .

Japan
USSR
KACHAPAG

to investigate the problems of Japan and
USSR sending differential and integral
CPND on separate tapes; or for KACHAPAG
to extract the integral CPND from amixed-mode tape "by 'REACTION' codes ,all centres

to discuss how differential CPND should
be exchanged and where the master files
should be stored, and to prepare theproposals for the next CPMD-meeting.

Actions concerning the bibliographic data index
NNCSC

to proceed t o produce a CINDA-type CPND
index as described in the proposal of

8 April 1976.
to publish,, if possible, in early 1977
a cumulative bibliography of integral
CPND derived from the McGowan list, andinvestigate the costs and the mechanismof distribution.
all CPND
service centres

to provide NNCSC with an estimate of
the required number of copies of the
CPND bibliography .

NDS

to distribute the minutes (including thereconmendations) of the •Technical Committee Meeting on the Treatment of Nuclear
Data Sources in INIS1 to all data centres.

30
Actions
Actions concerning the generalized

format10

Ohnumato write a memo describing the exact usage of
the EXFOR code 'RES'.

11

NDS

to write a memo describing the exact usage of
the EXFOR codes 'CN' and 'DI*.

12

NDS

to clarify the EXFOR manual on the use of thedata-headings fRATIO' and 'SIM1.

13

Ohnumato prepare a list of Japanese laboratories
involved in the production of CPND •

14

NDS

to create the appropriate lab-codes and update
the dictionaries accordingly •15

Ohnumato distribute revised samples of coding
differential CPND in EXFOR .

16

all data centres

to review and to comment on these coding samples •

17

NDS

to provide all data centres with all dictionaries
for neutron- and CP-EXFOR, in the form of tapes
or listings as specified in the minutes .

18

KACHAPAG
NDS

to replace all 6—character codes in dictionaries 16,
18, 21, 23 by 5-character codes and communicate
these changes to NDS for inclusion in thedi cti onaries.

19

all neutron
data centres

to clarify in the Manual the rules about theuse of pointers.

20

KACHAPAG

to draft a clarification of the meaning of thecoding EXP/THEO within the REACTION field forinclusion in the manual or dictionary.

21

all EXFOR compilingcentres

to investigate whether the suggested code (CIM)
in dictionary 31 which has a length of 5 characters instead of the usual 3, creates difficulties in EXFOR programs or not .

22

NDS

to add to the dictionary 24 of column heading
keywords additional varieties of keywords ofthe type HLn or MISCn, etc.

23

all EXFOR compilingcentres

to check whether the conclusion about col. 67 of
the ENDTRANS record is workable.

24

NDS

to update the EXFOR dictionaries according to
the conclusions on the EXFOR system •

25

NDS

to write a supplement to EXFOR and LEXFOR manuals
explaining the extensions for CPND •31Actions
Action concerning customer services
26

all data centres(action 2 from 11 4C-meeting continuing)keep the others informed about the progress ofthe centre's computational format, including
plans and preliminary formats.

Actions concerning network communications
27

NDS

to communicate the results of this meeting to
the Indian group and inquire about possible
cooperation •28

Dearnaley
Marcinkowski

to inform NDS of their preferred tape format.

29

all data centres

to ensure that all other centres have got all
memos issued so far (including KACHAPAG Information No. 1) .

30

all centres

to communicate any changes in the centres'
CPND programme, compared to the one definedat the meeting, by CP-memo .

31

all

to communicate to NDS the names and addresses of
persons interested in CPHD activities (measurers
and users) for the creation of a distribution listof CPND documents .

32*

KACHAPAG

to prepare a revision of KACHAPAG Information No. 1.

33

NNCSC

to inform Mr. Puller about the interest of the
CPND network in including photo-nuclear data andexplore the possibilities .

34

CJD

to investigate with the appropriate persons
whether Soviet photonuclear data activities
should be included in the CPND network .

35

NDS

to inform data compiling centers about any CPND
needs that become known •

36

all

to investigate and communicate whether there areother CPND activities not yet known to the network.

*) meanwhile fulfilled by Memo CP-B/2.

33
Exfor Conclusions
Conclusions about the CPHD Exfor system
REACTION
1.

The coding rules under the keyword REACTION appear to toe practicable. No
objection to this concept was received. (Action 15 from previous meeting,which was to test the feasibility of this concept, is regarded as fulfilled.)

2.

For the codes used under the keyword REACTION the following dictionaries
are introduced
Diet. 30
Diet. 31
Diet. 32
Diet. 34
Dict8 35

on
on
on
on
on

Process
BranchQuantity measured
Modifiers
Data typein Subfield 3
in Subfield 5in Subfield 6
in Subfield 8
in Subfield 9

The checking programs and the convenience of the compilers require to have aseparate dictionary for each of the subfields. The contents of these dictionaries
will be as specified in Memo CP-C/1, with some modifications as specified
further below.
3.

In subfield 3 of REACTION, two identical outgoing nuelides heavier than aare coded in the form 8-^-16+8-^-16. The proposals of coding this case in theform 2*8-/9-16 or 2J^-16 were not accepted, because the first case would require
an extra programming branch for the star, and the second case would result inunsystematic coding of nuclides, since it was agreed to keep the Z-number forthe target nucleus.

4.

The code SEQ is introduced in diet. 31 (REACTION subfield 5: branch) indicatingthat the sequence of outgoing particles as specified in subfield 3 under
REACTION is meaningful. In this case the general rule of coding outgoingparticles in the sequence of increasing Z and A does not apply, and the residual
nucleus is not necessarily the heaviest of the reaction products. (This decisionalso answers the proposal expressed in Memo CP-E/1 item 6).)

5.

The codes M+. M-. and (M) are coded in the branch field and not in the modifier
field under REACTION.

6.

The code (CIM) in dictionary 31 (branch), which has a length of 5 charactersinstead of the usual 3, is accepted unless a code of this length creates too
great difficulties in the programs of one of the centers. (Action 21 of the
CPND meeting).
In Dictionary 32 (Quantity measured) the code TLD as proposed in Memo CP-C/1
was not accepted. The codes FT and FT are kept. PY is reserved for a productyield under undefined experimental conditions where SIG or TOT do not apply.

7.

8.

The codes proposed in Memo CP-E/1, item 1), for the "BRANCH? subfield under
REACTION were not accepted since they were considered as not necessary fora unique description of the reaction and quantity measured.

9.

If someone wishes to code ions in Exfor under REACTION or elsewhere, this will
be done in the form 8-0-16(3+).

34
Exfor Conclusions

10.

The "multiple-reaction" formalism with pointers may be used for the isomeric"branches and ratios of the same reaction such that
total reaction cross—section,
partial cross-sections leading to isomeric states,sums and ratios of partial cross-sections
may a l l be entered in a single subentry, provided that the target nucleus,
the incident particle and the outgoing particles are the same. Thispossibility i s so far restricted to CPND.

Items other_than_REACTIOT11.

For other codes, the existing dictionaries are used. The existing
limitations in the length of codes (up to 5 characters in Dictionaries 16—23)
are left unchanged. (Action 18 of the CPH3) meeting).

12.

Under the keyword FACILITY different pairs of facility codes and lab-codesof the form (FACIL, 3NNNLAB) must be coded on separate lines.

13-

KACHAPAG had given some monitor reactions in coded form and some in freetext only. It was claimed that sometimes monitors seem to be doubtful andthat in such cases the free text was preferred. Meeting participants foundthis procedure not clear enough and suggested that an explanation in freetext would be desirable, for example in the form of a "COMMENT BY THE
COMPILER . . . " . It was then confirmed that monitor reactions should preferably be given in coded form supplemented,where necessary, by free text
explanation.

14*

Alphabetic characters (instead of a digit in HOT) Exfor) to be entered incol. 67 and in the f i r s t position of accession-numbers, are accepted, despiteof programming difficulties of some of the centers.

35
Exfor Conclusions
Conclusions relevant to the NND and CPND Exfor systems
EXPOR_structure
1.

The SUBENT record may contain in fieldsN^ - N5 (cols.45-66) center internal
information which is of no interest to recipients of the entry. (Although
this is a KACHAPAG internal matter, this should be added in the Manualon page III.6, in order that Exfor users may find an explanation of themeaning of this field, and in order to avoid that this field is assigned
a different purpose.)

2.

Col. 67 in the ENDTRANS record is to contain the number of character of theoriginating center, followed by 9's in col. 68-79. (This applies forcenter-to-center transmission tapes where throughout the tape col. 67
contains the code of the originating center. In other tapes which may
contain Exfor entries from various centers, the record identification
field cols, 67-79, of the ENDTRANS record should be such that it sorts
at the end of the tape. Compare Manual page III.3.) Action 23 of CPND meeting.

3.

Trailing records to fill up the last block should be repetitions of the
ENDTRANS record.

4.

It should be stated explicitly in the Manual (e.g. on page V.I. and VI.1.)
that in the COMMON and DATA sections the number of columns is unrestricted.

Pointers, etc.
5.

Pointers may be used in subentry 001 if they apply to all following subentries.

6.

Compilers are reminded of the rule that a pointer in the BIB-Section refers
to all subsequent records until a new pointer or keyword is encountered.

7.

If two different numerical results of the same quantity are obtained fromthe same experiment by two different ways of analysis or normalization,
two separate subentries must be made, linked to each other by appropriate
STATUS information. The solution with pointers as illustrated in thefollowing example
ISO-QUANT (...)
ANALYSIS l(...)2U.)
ENDBIB
DATA
EN

DATA

1DATA

2

is so far not accepted by all centers and can therefore not be used in NND
Exfor transmission tapes.
8.

In general pointers are used only when the data table contains morethan one DATA column. The different DATA columns are defined, by means ofpointers, either by the quantities coded under I S O - Q U A N T / R E A C T I O N or bytjie parameters entered under COMMON. In addition, items of BIB information
may be labelled by the same pointers.
In the following example pointers may be used within a BIB Section even if
the data table contains only one DATA column without a pointer.
DETECTOR
PART-DETl(...)
2(...)l(...)(Note: NNCSC does not recommend the use of pointers in this case unless
linked to a multiple Iso-quant, but can accept such constructions.)

36
Exfor Conclusions
DiCtionarie s_and_codes

9.

The code XR for X-rays is accepted in dictionary 13. The origin of the
X—rays (K, L, M eto») is not coded but may be given in free text.

10.

The length of the codes in dictionaries 16-23 remains restricted to
5 characters. Action 18 of the CPND meeting.

11.

The codes proposed in Memo CP-E/l, item 2, as addition to Diet. 22 on
Detectors were accepted. However, the code for "position sensitive solidstate detectors" was changed to PSSSD.

12.

In dictionary 24 the keywords of the type HLn will continue to be given
explicitly as HL1, HL2, HL3t etc., since check programs in various centersneed to have these codes in dictionary 24. NDS will enter additionalsuch keywords in dictionary 24 as they occur, and will enter for each ofthese keywords one or two additional varities, e.g. HL4 etc. in order toobtain more flexibility. (This is in reply to the proposal on the bottomof Memo 4C-I/8O, dispatched 76/4/12). Action 22 of the CPND meeting.

13.

The codes proposed in Memo CP-£/l, item 3f as additions to Diet. 25 on
Units were accepted.

14«Diet. 25 on Units will continue to include all unit-keywords, and the idea
to construct the unit—keywords from certain elements such as MJ—, N—, P—,
P- for micro, nano, pico, femto, was not accepted. However, whenever
new unit—keywords are introduced, such prefixes should be used in a consistentmanner.

15.

The decay units DPS and M U C I / M U A are both entered in diet. 25. In Exfor
entries preferably the same units should be used as given by the author.

16.

The column-heading keyword RATIO and SUM are kept (SUM so far in CPND
Exfor only). NDS should clarify their use. Action 12 of the CPND meeting.

Rules
17.

The Lexfor entry on "Nearly roonoisotopic elements" as proposed in item Eof memo 4C-1/76 of 76-3-26 is accepted and shall be added to the Lexfor
entry on "Monoisotopic elements". (Note by editor: On this Lexfor pagethe element symbols should be written consistently with capital characters
only.)

18.

If the coded information under DETECTOR starts with COINC, then all detector
codes following in the same pair of parentheses refer to the coincidence
arrangement. Any other detector to be coded must be given in a separate
line, as for example
DETECTOR (COINC, DET1, DET2).
(DET3). FOR UVW RADIATIONFOR XTZ RADIATIONIn the parentheses describing the coincidence arrangement, a detector code
may be given more than once.
(Note: This formalism was not formally adopted for NND. We believe howeverthat it would not disturb any existing programs so that it should be
acceptable also for NND.)

37
Exfor Conclusions
19•

Isomeric ratios and sums are entered in addition to the partial isomericcross-sections only when they were given by the author. For NND they are
entered in separate subentries; for CPHD the Multiple-Reaction formalism
may be used for entering such data in a single subentry.

20.

The revised Lexfor entry proposed in Memo 4C-3/l62 of 76/4/7 about differential
cross-sections relative to i t s value at a given angle, i s accepted.

21.

The rules for the use of the keyword ANALYSIS should be clarified in Diet.2.

22.

The proposal about the coding of metastable states of the residual nucleus
where the sequence number of the state obtained may be unknown, was accepted
as proposed in CP-B/l pages 1,2.

23.

For certain keywords the prescription exists (Manual page IV.2) that any
information given in parentheses must be repeated in free t e x t . Thus, inan "edit" program the coded information may be ignored in these cases.
If the compiler prefers not to repeat the coded information in the free text,
a point i s entered in the position following the closing parenthesis, orthe entire field from the closing parenthesis up to column 66 are left blank.
Both, the point or the blank field serve as an indicator to an "edit" programthat the coded information requires expansion.

24.

The proposal to allow in the DATA-section for semi-numerical data, such as"smaller than", 7/2—, X for a blank, e t c . , was not accepted, since t h i swould create difficulties in programming and since not a l l computers accept
a symbol like "smaller than".

25.

The BIB-Section in Exfor has i t s name for purely historical reasons. I t
rather functions as a "TEXT"-Section containing bibliographic, physics andadministrative (e.g. HISTORY) information. (This clarification should be
added on the top of page IV.1 of the Manual.)

26.

If original data are given together with deduced values within thesame subentry using the "multiple-isoquant" resp. "multiple reaction"formalism with pointers, then a note "DEDUCED qjJAHTITY" or "DEDUCED FROM..."should be given in free text behind the isoquant/reaction concerned. In
addition, under STATUS coded information i s entered linked by pointers to
the relevant REACTION resp. ISO-QUANT. Some details in the use of STATUS
codes may have to be defined in this connection.

27•

Different representations of the same variable mast not be given within
the same subentry unless they have different pointers. For example, theincident energy cannot be given in EV and ANGSTROM, or ANG-CM and ANG
cannot both be given. (KACHAPAG i s considering the usefulness of giving
lab-system and center-of-mass system data in the same subentry and will
eventually propose introducing t h i s option at least for CPND.)

38
Exfor Conclusions
Conclusions about the NMD Exfor system
Rules specific to NMD
1o

The proposal contained in Memo 4C-1/76 section D about angular correlations
and triple differential cross-sections is postponed until conversion from
ISO-QUANT to REACTION formalism since the quantity codes proposed are toolong for inclusion in dictionary 14.

2.

Memo 4C-I/77 (dispatched 76/4/2)proposing a Lexfor entry on resonance integrals
is accepted, except for the sentence "If no value of the cutoff energy is given
it may be coded as 0.5 eV". In such case 0.5 eV may rather be entered under
the column headingEN-MIN-APXAlternatively a comment on the cutoff energy may
be entered in free text only until further information is received from theauthor.
Also, the Note on page 2 of Memo 4C-1/77 should be revised such that all
resonance integrals, disregarding whether they were directly measured or
deduced from o(E) measurements, may be coded in Exfor with appropriate explanation in free text and under STATUS.

3.

For data entered under NUC-QUflNT the column heading EN must not be given. If
the incident neutron energy is not irrelevant as may be the case for level
density parameters, it may be entered in free text. (This is to be added on
Manual-page VIII.16.)

4.

Memo 40-1/80 (dispatched 76-4-12) on pointers and standards was accepted(except for the last 3 lines which are discussed elsewhere in the present
conclusions). The contents of this memo should be included in Lexfor underStandard. The column heading keywords STAND1 and STAND2 are not obsolete.

5.

The Lexfor entry on Single-Level Resonance Parameters proposed in 4C-I/78(dispatched 76/4/12) was accepted with some minor modifications:-

Under 1) Resonance energy:(instead of assigned)a) When the resonance energy is determined ...

-4 lines further below:-

Under 2) Resonance widths: keep the definition of P
Lexfor entry-

last line of same page: write units throughout in the style of columnheadings: EV, MILLI-EV, etc.

-

Under 3) Reduced neutron widths: the characters "nuM and'Vare inconsistent-omit the note: "E is in e V . In the formulae given E may have any unit.
Example: E = 1.2°keV, then 1.2 keV/eV = 1200 which is to be entered in
the formula.

-

Under 4) Peak cross-section: Add to the "Note" NP,RES,TER. (A probably
preferable correction of NP,RES,TER into NP/PCS,,TER should be postponed
until the conversion from ISO-QUANT to REACTION formalism.)-

Under 5) Resonance area: the factor in front of the ratio is inconsistentand disagrees with previous Lexfor entry. M C S C is.asked to check
what is correcto Also the units should be mentioned.

-

Under 6) Special representations: there is a typing error in the code so/so.

omit the word "only"
from the previous

6.

The question of Fission Yield Standards (see proposed Lexfor entry inMemo 4C-3/122 of 75/5/13) was postponed until after the conversion from
ISO-QUANT to REACTION formalism.

7«

The wmultxple—isoauant" formalism for isomeric cross—sections (compare
item 19« of the NND+CPND Exfor conclusions) was not yet accepted for NND.

39
Annex 1

Nuclear Structure and Nuclear
in the LUag

Reaction

Data

Activity

Data Centre

I.A.Kondurov, Yu.VoSergeenkov and Yu.I.Khairitonov
Leningrad

Nuclear

USSR Academy

Physics InstituteofSciences

This report is presented to the Nuclear Structure andDecay Data Meeting and the 2-nd Consult ants 'Meeting on
CEND Compilation, IAEA, Vienna, April-May, 1976<> The
main aim of the meetings i s to promote the international cooperation in the field of compilation, evaluationand distribution of data on nuclear structure and nuclear
reactions.

Bibliographic Data Exchange
1. The basis of any informational system (especially of that
presupposing international data exchange) i s the bibliographic r e ference filecomprising bibliographic document descriptions

anddescriptions of their contents as well in terms of a certain keyword system adequate to an automated document retrieval. At present
three nuclear data bibliographies are in use t
CINDA - Index of neutron data papers;
IHIS- Bibliographic system for data on nyclear
technology, in the main;

HDP- Recent References system adopted in Oar-Ridgefor nuclear structure and nuclear reaction data.

40
Annex 1

2. Developing the bibliographic system that provides the fundamental nuclear physics investigations the Data Centre acceptedtheNDP format for it embraces the description of papers on neutron physics, reactions with charged particles, and is used in descripting
theoretical works on low energy nuclear physics. The format is being
developed long enough, and the NDP-file contains almost all the works
on nuclear physics. Nearly all the principal nuclear physics journals
use NDP key-word descriptions of articles.
3» The LlJaP Data Centre cumulates the descriptions of all works
on nuclear physics printed by the soviet publishers. About 1500 such
abstracts enveloping the period from 1972 till now are filed by the/1/
Centre. These abstracts are partially published by our Centre ' '(radioactivity and nuclear reactions) and CAJaD (theoretical works on
nuclear structure) ' ' .
In accordance with the requirements of our retrieval system
the NDP format is transformed, when entering, into the internal format which rubricates out the authors, the title, ect., the key-words
being

reconstructed in the form that is more convenient for a ret-rieval. Fig.1

illustrated the two formats. The result may be prin-

ted both in Russian alphbet and in the form of transliterated text.
The logging is performed in EBCDIC-code on 9-track, 800 bpi magnetictape.
4. The NDP format may be accepted as a basis of the international bibliographic file on nuclear structure and nuclear reactions including the charged-particle reactions. The alternations and additions to the format proposed at the first CPND Meeting '"^' are wellfeasible and may be realized "in praxi". The main problem to be solved is the creation of the organization principles of the system

41
Annex 1functioning., i.eo :a) free exchange of information;b) regional data handling;c) coordinating centre (centres);d) dynamics and discipline of exchange;e) sofware unification where possible;f) procedure and periodicity of issue of current
and cumulative publications.
5. When organizing the international bibliographic file there
appears the problem of a uniform global index-number which is to begiven by many groups independently. Resting on such an index particular
files may be corporated with automatic diagnosis and duplicated record
elimination. The experience shows that for data handling (provided
that the quantity of income documents is not more than 10000 peryear) it is enough to use an index cosisting of year-number (2 digits),
three initial letters of the first author, and three final digits ofjournal page number , wherefrom the work begins, or the preprint/report number if there is a single work in the issue.
Random coincidences are here small and will be absolutely ejectedby a computer analysis if the agreed abbreviation of an issue title
is added.
6. As concerning the agreement in the abbreviations of magazinesand other issues, the international system CODEN is likely to be accepted, and for the proceedings of conferences and specialized meeting the abbreviations of EXFQR dictionary.
7. The LlJaF Data Centre is ready to participate in the international bibliographical data exchange and take the corresponding work
load in preparation and distribution of key-word abstracts on the
nuclear physics papers printed by Soviet Publishing Houses.

42
Annex 1

Numerical Data Exchange
1.

The totality of the produced and published numberical data

is so monstrous that it is difficult to raise the question of thepresentation of all these data in a computer format. None the less,there exists an urgent necessity in having raw information selected"by a certain technique. Well-known "Nuclear Data Sheets" periodically publishes selections of the "best works on the A-chains provided
with partial evaluation of measured quantities»
These data are being recorded in Oak-Ridge on magnetic tapeusing the ENSDF format. That format was specially developed for thepresentation of data on the properties of nuclear levels and transitions between them and that is why it can be used for the computerpresentation of the results of particular experimental works dealing
with nuclear structure. The Data Centre made an attempt to record inthis format the work on the investigation of low-lying excited statesof 1 ^ C s /V.
2. Another way of presentation of concrete work results is "horizontal" compilations. The Data Centre collects data and maintains
the files on lifetimes of nuclear excited states ' * , nuclear moments', properties of 0 + excited states and BO-transitions ' '. The

question of recording the data on rotational bands of the deformed
nuclei ''' andif-decay of analogue states ' ' is considered.

Till now each of the "horizontal" files existed in its own
format. At the same time all of them are describing the propertiesof excited nuclear states. The Data Centre elaborates the format forthe presentation of published numerical data on nuclear level cha racteristics. An example of a record of such a kind is given in
Fig.2 .

43
Annex 1

3. One should specify that none of the formats described isgood enough to record the raw spectra (J- and ft - spectra coinci dences, angular distributions . ..).EXFOR is to be the closest one
to solve the problem. So, it is worth examining the question of
adopting EXFOR to present raw experimental data, the more so thatthe journals have no possibility to publish all of them.
Evaluated Data
1. Two tendences can be distinguished now in the activity on
evaluated nuclear structure data,, These are general and specialized
evaluations.
General evaluations (see for example Nuclear Data Sheets, Tables of Isotopes '*', Radioactive Nuclei Decay Schemes '') collectthe best and average characteristics of ground and excited states
These evaluations are usially followed by a list of correspondingreferences; for the most important values several quantities are
given at the discretion of evaluator. Such a data presentation gives
the possibility to do a critical analysis of the data used. These
selections are very helpful for fundamental research implementation.
Meeting the needs of applied researches the works on specialized evaluations are widely developed simultaneously. The file on the
decay data of more than 800 nuclei ''''' compiled to provide the reactor technology business for may serve as an example of work of thiskind.
The data comprised in specialized files are actually of reference character, as a user treats them indisputably. That fact implies,
naturally, high requirements upon the preciseness and reliability ofthe data of this kind.

44
Annex 1

2. Aiming at information supply of fundamental nuclear physics
investigations the Data Centre is interested in maintaining the general and specialized evaluated data. Among specialized evaluations(for such investigations) the most important ones are the metrological data on nuclear radiation characteristics necessary for calibration measurements, the data of atomic physics (X-ray energies, attenuation coefficients ...) etc.
3. The Centre is deeply interested in maintaining the common
file of evaluated data on nuclear structure; this is why we are readyto participate in international cooperation taking upon ourselves
evaluation on 1-2 mass-chains with A in the range of 104-134. As to
the main principles of cooperation the Centre holds the ground of afree interchange of datao
4-. Discussing the conception of international file of evaluateddata on nuclear structure it is necessary to solve the following
question: which of nuclei characteristics should "be presented in thefile, as far as too much data are obtained in nuclear structure investigations.
The ultimate objective of the experimental part of nuclear
spectroscopy research is the constructioning of scheme of excitedstates of nuelei under study, where the quantum characteristics ofeach level (i.e., energy, spin, parity, magnetic and electric nuclear moments and partial transition probabilities, etc.) are performed
as completely as possible.
The aim is reached by measurements of distributions of energetic, time and space radiations connected with the process understudy. The designing of the level scheme out of the results of these measurements is done in several steps*

45
Annex 1

I . The result of the f i r s t step - distribution, measurements i s a set of raw s p e c t r a .

The information i s objec-

tive for a definite instrument as mispresenting i s due only
to the instrumental function.
I I . Taking into account the instrumental function within a certain mathematical model enables one to calculate the valuesof characteristics of ther a d i a t i o n smeasured ,the mispresentations connected with an accuracy of the mo del being introduced. When studying the bound nuclear s t a t e s ,such characteristics are the radiation energy (Ev, E-, Eft+,*?
?
E^ etc), their intensities (Iv, I*- etc.)» the complicatedevents intensities (I*Y» I S * etc.)

and the intensities depen-

dences on time, direction in space, polarization, magnetic f i eld and other parameters (I = I (t, V, H . . . ) .
I I I . An account for process* kinematics and for electromagnetic
nature of radionational transitions permits to calculate thet r a n si t i o nenergies, their intensities and multi-

polarities, possible values of spins and parities of nuclear
states, the transitions take place between.
IV. These data are enough to construct a model-independent scheme of excited states and to obtain their quantum characterise
tics: l e v e lenergies (B), their spins and parities (J ) ,magnetic and electric moments (ju, Q), and partial widths de termining the transition probabilities.
That step i s the highest degree of generalization of the experimental nuclear structure data and i t faces the theory, so that i ti s possible to compare the deduced characteristics with the nuclear
model predictions in view of checking up the l a t t e r .

46Annex 1The data of the 17-th step can make a conten of a file on theevaluated nuclear structure data. Tet this case is not realizable
because of the following reasons:a) the spins and parities are known not for all the deduced
levels;to) not all the transitions measured in decay and reactions
are placed usually in the level scheme.
Keeping in mind what has been said above it is reasonable todivide the file under discussion into two parts: (1) characteris tics of levels and (2) characteristics of radioactive decay,. The
first part will contain the data of the IV-th and Ill-rd steps ofinvestigation, and the second one - of the Il-nd step. Nuclear characteristics to be presented in files are listed in Table 1 and 2 •5. The question of choicing the computer format to present data
solvedin international file is a minor one and can be in practical discussion.
Programs for Solving Problems
in Atomic Nuclear Physics
The LlJaF Data Centre carries out a permanent wokr on assembling the library of problem-orientated computer programs to copewith the tasks of atomic and nuclear physics. The existence of sucha library will reduce the time and efforts spent both when comparing
the achieved experimental results with the predictions of different
models, and when examining the abilities of new models. The presenceof a whole row of common elements in varios problems of atomic andnuclear physics (such as solving of Schrodinger single particle equation for a number of specific potentials, calculations of matrix

47
Annex 1elements of different kind of single- and two- particles operators,
diagonalization of matrices, a variety of transformation functions
and coefficients etc.) is a peculiar feature. Thus, one of the primary tasks of the Data Centre activity is to identify such common
elements and to create the library of corresponding computer programs. Certain efforts are undertaken in this direction by enlisting
the cooperation of scientific staff of our Institute and Soviet andforeign scientific institutions as well.
Since the programs comprising the library of the Centre are intended for a user who may have no contracts with the authors, a number of specific demands must be fulfilled.
First of all, each program has the description of the problem stated,of the solution technique, and of its structure. It is adequate to
make out the essence of the problem to be solved. The discription
contains the formulae used, and all the values involved are explained*
Such descriptions are published as preprints; their abstracts arecollected in Bulletin of the Data Centre '*** , The library is adopted for BBSH-6 computer.
Using some programs of the library the Data Centre has produced
the Tables of ELebsh-Gordan Coefficients / 12/f , the Tables of Electron
Energy Eigenvalues, Densities nearby Zero and Mean Values of Selfconsistent Atom and Ion Fields '^3/1 g ^ t n e tables of Internal Conversion Coefficients for light Huclei (Z£3O)

48
Annex 1

References
1. M.P.Avotina, I.A.Kondurov, Yu.N.Novikov, Yu.V.Sergeenkov.
Preprint LUaF-65, L., 1973
2. V.M.Zhukov, L.P.Martens, E.E.Saperstein.
Preprint IAE-2403, M., 1974
3. H.D.Lemmel, ed.

INDC(NDS)-69, IAEA, Vienna, 1975

4. Bulletin of the L U a F Data Centre Nfl 2, L., 1975
5. E.E.Berlovich, L.A.Vaishnene, I.A.Kondurov, Yu.N.Novikov,
Yu.V.Sergeenkov.
6. N.A.Voinova.

Preprint L I J a F - W , L., 1975

Preprint LljaF-230, L., 1976

7. H.B.Begzhanov, VoM.Belen'ky, S.H.Abdurakhmanov, V.K.Usharov.
Radiational Processes in Atomic Nuclei. "FAN" Publishing
House, Uz.SSR, 1973
8. Yu.V.Naumov, O.S.Eraft,

Gamma-Decay of Analogue Resonances.

E Ch A Ya, v.6, 4, 1975
9* C.M.Lederer, J.M.Hollander, I.Perlman.
Tables of Isotopes, New York - London, 1968
10. B.S.Dzhelepov, L.K.Peker, V.O.Sergeev.

Radioactive Nuclei

Decay Schemes. USSR A.S. Publishing House, M.—L., 1966
11. C.W.Reich, R.G.Helmer,

in Nuclear Cross Sections and Techno-

logy, BBS, Washington, 1975, p.1*
12. I.V.Nikitina, Yu.I.Kharitonov.
Preprint LIJaF-138, L.t 1975
13* I.M.Band, M.B.Trzhaskovskaya.
Preprint LIJaF-90, LlJaF-91, LlJaF-92, L., 197^
14* M.A.Listengarten, I.M.Band, M.B.Trzhaskovskaya.
Preprint IIJaF-235, L., 1976

49
Translated from Russian^Centre for Nuclear Structure and Reaction Data of the
USSR State Committee on the Utilization of
Atomic Energy
The Centre's experience of charged particle nuclear
data compilation(Report for the 2nd IAEA Consultants Meeting on
Charged Particle Nuclear Data Compilation)
F.E. Chukreev, L.L. Sokolovskij

A number of recommendations were made at the IAEA Consultants
Meeting on Charged Particle Nuclear Data Compilation which took placefrom 8 to 12 September 1975 [l].
The Centre for Nuclear Structure and Reaction Data (CAJaD) of the
USSR State Committee immediately embarked on their implementation. At
a meeting of representatives of institutes which come under the USSR
State Committee and the USSR Academy of Sciences it was agreed that theauthors of scientific works would - in collaboration with the staff of
CAJaD — prepare numerical material for a charged particle nuclear data
file covering the subjects agreed upon at the IAEA Consultants Meeting.
The representatives of institutes expressed the wish that numerical datacompilation activities be extended to include works containing differential
data, in which scientists concerned with fundamental research areinterested.
CAJaD, knowing the difficulties which neutron data centres encounterin obtaining nunerical material from authors (by no means every referencein CINDA has an asterisk), decided to devote attention to the formulationof organizational and technical measures.
After several trials we established that the best way of obtaining
numerical data from authors was to break the task down into three stages:

50
Annex 2

1.

CAJaD locates publications with charged particle nuclear dataand its staff prepares an ENTRY. The publication is describedand an indication given of the experimental technique and any
special features of the experiment. Approximate values areentered in the DATA sections and two copies of the printout (Listing) ENTRY — are sent to the author(s) for checking;2.

The author(s) correct(s) the ENTRY text, puts the true values inthe DATA sections and returns one copy to CAJaD;

3.

CAJaD carries out the necessary editing of the ENTRY text and alast check to ensure compliance with the EXFOR rules.

Experience - admittedly limited so far - has shown that, with thisdivision of labour, the author(s) rapidly and very carefully correct(s)the material prepared lay CAJaD.
He plan to automate the first stage as far as possible, so that thework can "be performed in the conversational mode lay someone with qualifications
lower than those required at present.
Work on automation of the third stage is progressing.

The material

received from the Nuclear Data Section is proving very helpful, although
we cannot use the programs as our computer does not have a translator
from PL-1.
CAJaD is waiting for the final version of the "Agreements about the
CPHD EXPOR system" reached during the meeting in September 1975*

So far(as of 20 February 1976) we have only a rough version, and we do not wantto have to do the work twice.
Soviet scientists appreciate the IAEA*s efforts to arrange for international co-operation in the compilation and evaluation of nuclear data.
However, they almost all feel that such co-operation is possible only on
the basis of a free exchange of experimental and evaluated data. Theirreasoning is logical: "If a need for certain data arises, in the absenceof a free exchange of data it is quicker to carry out measurements andevaluation independently than to await the outcome of talks about thetransfer of data. In the absence of a free exchange of data, for a country
to meet its own needs it should not waste resources on the preparation of

51
Annex 2

data for an international file but rather carry out evaluations to the extent
necessary.

Thus, if there is no free exchange, we shall have to meet manyof our own requirements while contributing at the same time to an international
scheme."It is obvious that effective international co-operation must be based ona free exchange of data.
It is also obvious that the co-ordinated work of scientists from many
countries is possible only when an evaluator has easy access to the literatureon the question of interest to him. This problem must be solved through aninternational bibliographic file covering the field of interest and arranged
in such a way that automatic retrieval of the necessary literature is possible.
When choosing the format and contents of such a file, one is compromising
between two contradictory requirements;-

The file should contain only the necessary minimum of information
about the investigations carried out, so that the associated costs
may be kept as low as possible;-

The file should be designed for the needs not only of the present
but also, at least, of the next decade.

In our opinion, a file meeting these requirements might well be basedon the keyword system used at Oak Ridge.
Our reasons for favouring this system have been stated on a number ofoccasions (see, for example, Ref. [2]).
As such a system is clearly redundant in the sense that it enables one
to describe investigations relating to "differential" data, if it wereadopted there will be no need to construct a completely new bibliographic
file when one starts making practical use of "differential11 data (whichis inevitable).
Could part of the M I S file be adopted as an international file ofbibliographic data?

In our opinion, it could not. It is being developed [3]with a view not to its improvement as a system permitting machine retrieval

52
Annex 2but to its becoming an ordinary abstract journal like the journals of the
All-Union Institute of Scientific and Technical Information (VUJTTl),"Nuclear Science Abstracts", etc.
With a keyword system of the Oak Ridge type, it would be possible topublish the information most needed at a given time - for example, byselecting from it only those works which contain "integral" data andconverting them to a format of the CUJDA type.
_™

*/

The modernized EXPOR system is suitable for the "fact©graphic"-*
file of nuclear reaction data.
Our experience indicates that the description of investigations involves
only dictionary difficulties, which can easily be overcome in the normal
course of work. For example, P.P. Qaitriev's very active team, articles
by whom appear in almost every issue of "Atomnaya Ehnergiya", presents datain terms of nCi/[iA»hour - i.e. in terms of activity per unit charge. Is
this unit convenient, or would it be better to speak in terms of yield(radioactive nuclei/beam particle)?

Such questions can be resolved in thenormal course of work.
CAJaD will be responsible for the dissemination of both evaluated andexperimental data in the USSR.
REFERENCES[l] Consultants Meetings on Charged Particle Nuclear Data (CPND).
Compilation, Vienna, 8-12 Sept. 1973. UTDC (EDS) - O69.
[2] SOKOLOVSKIJ, L.L., FENIS, Yu.1., CHUKREEV, F.E., USTDC (NDS) - 6l/W +spec.

Vienna, 1974*[3] M I S Atomindex, Vol. 6, U 18 (part II). 15 September 1975,
HH 199O42-2O2245t P» 306, 201952.

Translator's note.
"Factographitf'data
represent a stage beyond the "bibliographic" stage, being related
to information analysis.

53
Memo CP-B/l^7 A
Information
ARTICLE

Nr.1

ROUP
K E R N F O R S C H U N G S Z E N T R U M• D - 7 500 K A R L S R U H E• P O S T F A C H

3 6 4 0Karlsruhe,• T E L E X

7 8 2 6 - 4 8 4

M a r c h 1976

Last year it was decided to start with an international

cooperationin the field of compilation, evaluation and dissemination of integral
charged particle reaction data, like cross sections and thick target
yields. For details see INDC (NDS)-69, which contains the conclusionsof the Consultants' Meeting in Vienna(September1975). It was also

accepted that the Nuclear Data Section of the IAEA should annuallyconvene such Meetings so that the groups actively engaged in handlingcharged particle reaction data could discuss pertinent subjects.
It was proposed that in between the groups should inform each otherabout the progress of the work, necessary changes in the keywords etc.
At the Consultants' Meeting it was decided that the Charged-ParticleFile (KACHAPAG-File) should be based on the EXFOR-format used forthe compilation of Neutron-Data. This is possible only if several
changes are introduced. At the meeting the proposed changes werediscussed at length and many recommendations were formulated. Since
we did not receive any objections we assume that these recommendations
are generally accepted and that we can proceed with this new versionof the EXFOR-format.
In addition to the changes in the codes consideredin Vienna thefollowing topic should be discussed: According to the rules given
in LEXFOR, metastable states are denoted by Z-S-A-Mi. The number i canbe omitted only if the sequence is uncertain. This nomenclature ispossibly applicable for neutron reactions, where in general wellinvestigated nuclides are formed. But LEXFOR gives no rules forwhich an excited state should be called a metastable state. In thecase of charged particle induced reactions the nuclides formed are

54
Annex 3normallynot

so w e l l - i n v e s t i g a t e d

k n o w n whether the p r o d u c t
state. Therefore
unambiguous
half-life

and/orConsequently

state

is only

reaction
under

of

and

of cross

sectionsin

inducedr e a c t i o n s . For

prepareda listAs can be

seen

the

the n u c l i d eformedindefinedthe p r o p e r t i e s

used

in fullof the other
File

are

changeslengthtable

dictionaries

listedapproved

in tablebydeveloped

not usedtargetyieldsactually

1 only(neglectingbymetastable
the
given

'RAD-DET1.

the c o n v e n i e n c eof the codesfromthe number

an

the

of

codes

thick

for

emitted' P A R T - D E T ' orandbe given

the r a d i a t i o n
that

not

metastable

the

that

d a t a , c o n t a i n manytheis eveninstance

The E X F O R - d i c t i o n a r i e s , w h i c h were
neutronitforbe u n a m b i g u o u s l y

the k e y w o r d sorshouldthe p r o d u c t ,we propose

optional

shouldofinformation

the energy

decay.

sometimes

is in the groundadditionaldescription

and

for

for

the

compilation

for chargedof c o m p i l e r s
applied7 out

describing

particlewehavein K a r l s r u h e .

of 23 d i c t i o n a r i e ssome minorchanges).

appliedup

to now

2. Thislist alreadythe C o n s u l t a n t s ' M e e t i n g

in theThe(Prof. D r . H.

codes

KACHAPAG-

contains
of

are

last

all

year.

Munzel)

the

55

Annex

Table 1

IUSANAL
l'JSASTB
2JAPNIIDICTIONARYDICTIONARY
NC
NC/A

NC/8

PPS/A
PRS/A

(FERMI NATIONAL L A B . , gATAVIA, ILLINOIS)(STATE UN1VCRSITY OF N£W YORK. S7CNY. BROOK, H.Y.
(NI1GATA U N I V . , NIIGATA
4700109TYPE OF REFERENCE
3
5751210JOURNALS?.
WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGES AND ADDITIONS:(NUOVO CIMENTO). NUOVO CIMENTO S E R . I O
2ITY
STARTING WITH VOL.1 ( 1 9 5 5 ) UNTIL VOL.39 NO.4 ( 1 9 6 5 )(NUOVO CIMENTO A) NUOVO CIMENTO SECTION A , SER.IO
2ITY
STARTING WITH VOL.40 N O . l ( 1 9 6 5 ) UNTIL VOL.70 ( 1 9 7 0 )S E R . l l STARTING WITH V O L . 1 ( 1 9 7 1 )NOTE * NC/A CONTAINS ELEMENTARY PARTICLE PHYSICS(NUOVO CIMENTO B) NUOVO CIMENTO SECTION B, SER.IO
2ITY
STARTING WITH VOL.40 N O . l ( 1 9 6 5 ) UNTIL VOL.70 ( 1 9 7 0 )S E R . l l STARTING WITH V O L . 1 ( 1 9 7 1 )(PROC.PHYS.SOC(LONOON)SECT.A) PROCEEDINGS OF THE
2UK
PHYSICAL SOCIETY, LONDON, SECTION A(PROC.ROY.SOC,LONDON,SER.A) PROCEEDINGS OF THE
2UK
ROYAL SOCIETY, LONDON, SERIES A , MATHEMATICAL AND

DICTIONARYPHYSICAL SCIENCES
6751110CERN-

WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITION?:(CERN EUR0P.ORG.FOR NUCL.RES.) CERN EUROPEAN

32111CERUNCHANGEDUNCHANGEDUNCHANGED56
Annex 3
Table 2750930 INFORMATION IDENTIFIER KEYWORDS 2

DICTIONTITLE
AUTHOR
INSTITUTE
REFERENCE

METHOD
FACILITY

DETECTORANALYSISKEYWORD O3L7GATORY EXCEPT fcHEN NOT RELEVANT.
FREE TEXT ONLY.
KEYWORD + ALL NAMES I N PAPFNTHESE:. OBLIGATORY.
KEYWORD + CODED INFORMATION IN PARSNTHES6S CBLIGATCRY.
SEE DICTIONARY 3 FCR INSTITUTES.
KEYWORD + COOED INFORMATION IN PARENTHESES OBLIGATORY.
UP TC 6 SIDE-FIELDS I N CODE.
SEE DICTIONARYFCR REFERENCE-TYPE
DICTIONARYFCR JOURNALSDXCTICNARYFCR REPORTS
DICTIONARYFCR CONFERENCES AND EOQKS
SE•NETHCO't ' F A C I L I T Y ' f •DETECTOR', ' A N A L Y S I S ' .
AT LEAST ONE OF THESE KEYWORDS MUST BE PRESENT.
IF A 1PERTINENT CODE I N THE RELEVANT DICTIONARY EXISTS,
THEN KEYWORD AND CGDE SHOULD BE GIVfcrN.
KEYWORD OBLIGATORY EXCiPT WHEN NOT RELEVANT. FREE 11
GR CQCED INFORMATION IN PARENTHESES PLUS FREE TEXT.
S£E DICTIONARY 21
THE FIRST SUBFI1LD OF TH? KEYWORD GIVING THE TYPE OF
THE FACILITY {SEE D I C T . 1 8 ) TS OBLIGATORY EXCEPT KHLNNOT RELEVANT. THE SECOND SUBF1ELD GIVING THE LOCATION
CF THE FACILITY (SEE DICT.S) IS OPTIONAL. CODEDINFORMATION IN PARENTHESES AND/OR FREE TEXT.
KEYWCRD OBLIGATORY EXCEPT WHEN NOT RELEVANT.
FREE TEXTSOR CODED INFORMATION I N PARENTHESES PLUS FREc TEXT.
3S££ DICTIONARY 223
KEYWORD OBLIGATORY EXCEPT WHEN NOT RELEVANT.
FREE TEXT3
OR CODED INFORMATION IN PARENTHESES PLUS FREE TEXT.
3
SEE DICTIONARY 25
3

SAMPLEKEYWORD OPTIONAL.

•COMMENT

THE PARTICLE
CR NUCLIDE DfTECTEC MUST EE EVIDENTEITHER FZOH 'REACTION', ' P/>RT-C£T • , 'RAD-DET' OR*
REACTION

3

3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
-5
3

FREE TEXT ONLY.

•DECAY-LATA'.

K5YWCRD + CODED INFORMATION IN PARENTHESES OELIGATCRYFCR CH/RGliD PARTICLE INDUCED REACTIONS. UP TC
9 SU3FIELDS(SF1 (3F2 , 3F3)
, S F £ , SF6,
,SF<; )
SF1 TARGET NUCLIDE Z - S - A ( - M X )(SEE EXPLANATION BELOW)
SF2 PROJECTILE(SEE D1CT.13 AND EXPL.BELCW)SF3 OUTGOING PARTICLE(3)(SEE CICT.12 AND SXPL.BELOW)
SF4 PRCDUCT NUCLIDE Z - S - M - V X ) (SEE CXPLANATICN BELOW)
SF5 BRANCH(SEE CICT.10 + D I C T . 1 2 )5F6 QUANTITY MEASURED(SES C I C T . 1 0 )SF7 PARTICLE, NCT USEC FCR REACT. WITH CHARGED PARTICL.
SF8 MODIFIER(SEE C I C T . 1 2 )SF9 CLASSIFICATIONI SEE C I C T . 1 2 )TYPES CF OUTGOING PARTICLES I N SF3 MUST EE
SEPARATED SY + , E . G . 2N+°+A.
Tl-E NUCLIDE IS GIVEN IN THE FCRM Z - S - A . I N GENERAL THISMEANS THE GROUND-STATC OF THE NUCLIDE, WHICH CCULC ALSO
BE GIVEN EXPLICITLY 3Y Z - S - A - G . A M E T A S T A B L E STATE I S
DEFINED BY Z - S - A - M . I F MORE THAN ONE MCTASTAELE STATE
EXISTS THE NOTATION Z - S - A - V l , Z - S - A - ^ 2 ETC. NAY BE

3

57
Annex 375 93Q INFORMATION IDENTIFIER KEYWORDS I

DICTICN

USED. I N ANY C\SE THE DEFINITION MUST 3E UNAMBIGUOUS BYSTATINS ADDITIONAL PROPERTIES OF THE STATE, LIKE
HALF-LIFb AND/3R RADIATION ENERGY.
FCR SF2 AND SF3 PARTICLES HSAVIiR THAN AN ALPHAPARTICLE ARE COOED IN THr SAMF- WAY AS I N SF1 AND SF4.
IF SP5 TO SF9 CONTAIN
E T h / N CNE CCOE A SLASH IS
USED FCR SEPARATION.
THE PARTICLE Db-TECT£O MUST BE EVIDENT EITHER FROM
PART-DET•ISC-CUANT* OK FROM ' P A R T - C E 1 ' .
I F KEYWORD PRESENT,THCN CODED INFORMATION IN PARENTHESES OBLIGATORY.
SEE DICTIONARY 13
KEYWORD AND CODED INFORMATION I N PARENTHESES ARE
RAC-DETOBLIGATORY I F THE NUCLID'c CBStRVEO I S NCT CBVICUS FROM•REACTION' OR •DECAY-CATA•. Tl-S FIRST SUBFIELD GIVESTHE NUCLIDE AND THE ADDITIONAL SU13FIELDS THE TYPES OF
THE; RADIATION OBSERVED {SEE D I C T . 1 3 ) .
I F KEYWCRD PRESGNT, THE CATA FCR OBSERVED RADIATICN HAS
TC BE GIVEN UNDER 'DECAY-DATA'.
DECAY-DATA KEYWORD OPTIONAL. I F KEYWORD PRESENT, THEN CODEDINFORMATION I N PARENTHESES OBLIGATORY. THE SUBFIELDSARE SEPARATED BY COMMAS ( S F 1 , SF2 , . . . . )SF1 NUCLIDE Z - S - M - M X )(SEl: 'REACTION')(FLOATING POINT NUMBER)
SF2 HALF-LIFE
SF3 TYPE OF RADIATION(SEE
CICT.12)SF4 ENERGY OF RADIATION IN KEV (FLOATING POINT NUMBER)
SF5 ABUNDANCE CF RADIATION PER DECAY {FLOAT. PT. NUMB.)S F . . . SF3,3F4 AND SF5 MAY EE REPEATED AS OFTEN AS
NECESSARY
FRE- TEXT OPTIONAL.
MONITORKEYWORD C3LIGATCRY EXCEPT WHEN NCT RELEVANT. CCD=1D
INFORMATION UP TC 13 SU3FIELCS I N PARENTHESES PLUS
FREE TEXT.
SF1 TC SF4 MONITOR REACTION, NOTATION AS GIVENI N 'REACTION* SF1 TO S F 4 .
SF5 ACCESSION NUMBER OF MCMTCR REDACTION I N EXFOR FILE
SFd FIRST AUTHOR OF PUBLICATION, ADDITIONAL AUTHORSARF NOTED 3Y +. EXAMPLE, LANGE5 + ,SF7 TC SF11 OR SF12 REFERENCE,NOTATION AS GIVEN I N•REFERENCE'.
NEXT SUBFIELD (SF12 CR SF13) CPTICNAL INFORMATION A3CUTTHE DATA, AS EVALUATED CF. RECCMMENDED DATA (SEEREL-REFKEYWORD OPTIONAL. CODED INFCRVA7ION UP TO 8 SUBFIELDSI N PARENTHESES PLUS FREE TEXT.
SF1 THE REASON FCR CITING THE REFERENCE (SEE
DICT.2O).
IT THE CODE 'N« I S USED A FREE TEXT I S
CBLIGATCRY.
SF2 FIRST AUTHOR CF PUBLICATION, ADOITICNAL AUTHORSARE NOTED 3Y +SF3 TO SF3 REFERENCE, NOTATION AS GIVFN IN 'REFERENCE'THE KEYWCRD 'REL-REF* REFERS TO PUBLICATIONS WHICH ARC
RELEVANT TO AN ENTRY QR A SUBENTRY, FOR INSTANCE TC
THOSE PUBLICATIONS WHICH 4RE INCLUDED IN AN EVALUATION.
KtYWORD 'ADDITIONAL RESULTS' OPTIONAL. FREE TEXT ORCGDEO INFORMATION IN PARENTHESES PLUS FREE TEXT (SEE

DICT.12)

AOC-RSS

58
Annex

DICTION2

7 5 0 9 3 0 INFORMATION IDENTIFIER KEYWORDSC I CT . 2 ) .

CORRECTION KEYWORD 0 P T I O N A L . . FREE TEXT ONLY
ERR-ANALYS KEYWORD OBLIGATORY EXCEPT WHEN NOT RELEVANT.
COMMENTMISC-COLFLAGSTATUSHISTCRYDICTION
TOT
NON
ABS
GEM
NEM
PEM
AEM
SIG
TTY
FY
PY

FREE T E X T , OR HEADING CF RELEVANT ERROR-COLUMN I N
PARENTHESES PLU5 FREE TEXTKEYWORD O P T I O N A L .
FREE TSXT ONLYKEYWORD O P T I O N A L .
I F KEYWORD PRESENT THEN CCLUMNHEADING ' f l l o C '• M I S C 1 ' CR ' M I S C 2 ' E T C . IN P/RENTHESESIS OBLIGATORY.
KEYWORD OPTIONAL.
I F KEYWORD PR&SSNT ThEN THE FLAG
NUM3ER IN PARENTHESES IS CBLIGATCRY.
K5VWCRD CBLIGATCRY EXCEPT WHEN THE SOURCE CF THE DATAI S GIVEN UNDER 'REFERENCE' ANC NO CTHER 'STATUS'
INFORMATION APPLIES. CODE FROM CICT 16 IN PARENTHESES
PLUS FREE TEXT.
FREE TEXT ALONE I F NO COOE APPLIES.
3KEYWORD + CODED INFORMATION IN PARENTHESES CELIGATORY
3
GIVING A DATE IN THE FORM YYMNDD PLUS A ONE CHARACTER 3
ACTICN-CODE. THG CATE 15 CBLIGATCRY, THE ACTICN-COCE IS3
OPTIONAL. THE ALLOWED ACTICN-CODES ARE FOLLOWING
3
R - DATA RECEIVED AT THE CENTRE
3
C - COMPILED AT THE CENTRE
3
L - ENTERED INTO LIBRARY
3
T - CONVERTED PROM PREVIOUS COMPILATION
3
S - TRANSMITTED TO OTHER CENTRES
3
A - IMPORTANT ALTERATIONS
3
U - UNIMPORTANT ALTERATIONS
3
D - ENTRY CR SUBENTRY DELETED. THIS MUST BE FOLLOWED BY3FREE TEXT JUSTIFYING THE DELETION
3

10741002 QUANT-FIELD 1 (PR0CESSES+PAFAMSJ3TOTAL REACTION CROSS C-ECTKN INCLUDING SCATTERINGNCNELASTIC = TOTAL REACTION CROSS SECTION EXCEPTELASTIC SCATTERING
ABSORPTION = TOTAL REACTION CROSS SECTION EXCEPTSCATTERINGGAMMA-EMISSION, SHOULD BE APPLIED ONLY IF THE CODE
G+X I S USED I N SF3 CF 'REACTION' (OUTGOING PARTICLES)
NEUTRON-EMISSION, SHOULD BE APPLIED ONLY I F THE CODE
N+X I S USED I N SF3 GF 'REACTICN' (OUTGOING PARTICLES)
PRCTCN EMISSION, SHOULD BE AFFLIED ONLY I F THE CCDE
P+X IS USGO IN SF3 CF 'REACTION' (OUTGOING PARTICLES)
ALPHA-EMISSION, SHOULD 3E APFL1EC GNLY IF THE CODE
A+X I S USED IN 3^3 CF 'REACTION' (OUTGOING PARTICLES)(S1GVA) CROSS SECTION FOR Tl-fc FORMATION CF THE
SPECIFIED PRODUCT NUCLIDE OR THE SPECIFIED REACTIONTYPE ( X , Y )(THICK-TAR3CT-YIEL0) THICK-TARGET-YIELD FCR THE
SPECIFIED PRODUCT NUCLIDEIFISSICN YIELD) INDEPENDENT, CUMULATIVE AND TOTAL CHAINYIELD SEE MODIFIER ( D I C T . 1 2 )(PRODUCT YIELD) I N CASE OF CHARGED PARTICLE RKACTICNSTHIS CCDE IS USED WHENEVER ' S I G ' , «TTY» OR «FY«
CANNOT BE APPLIED, E . G . AVERAGE CROSS SECTION FOR A
LIMITED ENERGY RANGE. EXPLANATORY FREE TEXT I S
OBLIGATORY.

59

Annex
DICTION
RAW
REL
FCT
AV
PAR
PR
DL
CN
DI
»1 +
M(M)
BIN
TER

IND
CUV

12

750106 QUANT-FIELD

3 (MODIFIERS)(RAW C/'TA { SEE TE XT ) J(RELATIVE DATA) TO BE COMBINED WITH ARBITRARY U N I T S .
OTHERWISE LSc FCT,.
(DATA TIMSS A FACTOR (SEE T E X T ) )(AVERAGE)
PARTIAL = .LEAVING THf RESIDUAL NUCLEUS I N A SPECIFICLEVEL CR EMITTING A SPECIFIC GAMMA OR PARTICLE GROUPDELAYLDPARTIAL CROSS-SECTION VIA COMPOUND NUCLEUS
PARTIAL CFCSS-SgCTJGN VIA C1RF.CT INTERACTION
TRANSITIONINCLUDING FCRMATICM VIA
TRANSITIONEXCLUDING FCRMATIC'l VIA
INCLU3XCN/EXCLUSICN CF FCRfATICN VIA ISCMERIC
TRANSITION UNCERTAIN (COMMENT BY TH5 COMPILER)
BINARYTERNARY
INCEPcNCENT YItELO CF THE PRGCICT NJCLIDE VIA DIRECTFCFMATJCN CNLYCUMULATIVE V I E L D , I . e . YIELD CF THE PRCCUCT NUCLICBVIA DIRECT FORMATION AMD RAD1CACTIVE DECAY, EXCLUDINGISOMERIC TRANSITICN.
(CUM)• COMMENTAPPLICATION OF THE CODE 'CUM' I S UNCERTAIN(COMMENT BY THR COMPILER)
THu MODIFIER HID AND CUM ARE USEC FOR ALL KINDS CF
NUCLEAR REACTIONS.

CCDES FOR CLASSIFICATION USED IN SF9 CF 'REACTION'
EXP
THEC
EVAL
RECOM

EXPERIMENTAL DATACALCULATIONS BASED ON THEORYEVALUATED DATARECOMMENDED DATA

3
3
3
3
3
3

60
Annex 3
DICTION

13741031PARTICLES

2

G
N
P
D
T
HE2
A
FF

(GAMMAS) EXCEPT DECAY GAMMAS(NEUTRONS)(PRCTCNS)(EEUTERONS)(TRITONS)(Hf-3).
(ALPHAS) HE-<+(FIS5ICN FRAGMENTS)

DG(DECAY GAMMAS) USED FCR GAMMAS EMITTED FROM HETASTABLE 3
STATES AND FOR GAMMAS FCLLCWING A PARTICLE-EMITTING
3
DECAY (E.G. BETA D£CAY)
3(AMNIHILATICN RADIATION)
3(DECAY BETA-)
3IDFCAY EETA5) UNSPECIFIED WHEThEP B+ CR B3(DECAY BSTA+) POSITRCN3
3(ELECTRONS) OTHSR THAN DECAY BETAS
3(RECOIL NUCLEUSJ
3(RESICUAL NUCLEUS)
3(PROMPT NEUTRONS)
3(DELAYED NEUTRONS)
3(X-RAYS)(UNDEFINED OUTGOING PARTICLES) IF THE AUTHOR DOES NOTSTATE ThE KINO AND NUM3ER CF THE OUTGCING PAPTICLcSIN CHARGED PARTICLE INDUCED REACTIONS CR IF AM3IGUITY
EXISTS IN RESPECT TO THE REACTION TYPES INVOLVED.
(ELECTRON CAPTURE)(SPONTANEOUS FISSION)

AR
BB
B+
E
RCL
RSC
PN
ON
XR
X

EC
SF

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

DICTION

PRELM

SPSCD

DEP

APRVD

UNOBT
GUTDT

RNORM

CCMP
CUPVE
CPX-CURVE

DICTION
CCW
LINAC
VDG
VDC-T
CYGFF
CYCLO
SYNCH
ISOCYCSYNCYC
MICRT
OYNAM

16

730122STATUS

61
Annex 3
3

(PRELIMINARY OATA") DATA LABELLED BY AUTHOR AS PRELIM'RY3
FREE TEXT = AUTHOR'S INFORMATION ABOUT F I N A L I Z I N G THE3DATA.
3ALSO TO BE USED FOR •DATA NOT TO BE QUOTED PRJOR
3TO P U B L I C A T I O N 1 .
(DATA SUPERSEDED) DATA SUPERSEDED BY AUTHOR'S R E V I S I O N S
3AND REVISED DATA ENTERED IN LIBRARY.
FRSE TEXT= CROSS-REFERENCE TO SUPERSEDING DATA TABLE3
3(DEPENDENT DATA)FREE TEXT = CROSS-REFERENCE TO THE INDEPENDENT DATA 3FROM WHICH DEPENDENT DATA WERE OBTAINED. 3
EXAMPL£= GAMMA-WIDTH WHEN OBTAINED BY SUBTRACTION
3
FROM INDEPENDENTLY MEASURED TOTAL-WIDTHS
3
AND NEUTRON-WIDTHS.
3(APPROVED BY AUTHOR) PROOF-COPY WAS APPROVED BY AUTHOR 3
AND AUTHOR'S CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN ENTERE-D.
3
FREE TEXT= NAME AND DATE OF APPROVAL
3(DATA UNOBTAINABLE FROM AUTHOR)
3
FREE TEXT= EXPLANATION WHY UNOBTAINABLE
3(NORMALIZATION OUT-OF-DATE)
3
FREE TEXT= REASON OR CROSS-REFERENCE TO RENORMALIZED 3
DATA TABLE
3(DATA RENORMALIZED) DATA RENORMALIZED BY OTHER THAN
3
AUTHOR.
3
FREE TEXT= EXPLANATION OF RENORMALIZATION AND CROSS-3
REFERENCE TO AUTHOR'S ORIGINAL DATA.
3NOTE = ONLY TO BE USED FOR NON-TRIVIAL RENORMALiZATN 3
BY AN EVALUATOR . COMPILATION CENTRES SHOULD
3
GENERALLY STORE THE AUTHOR'S ORIGINAL
3
NORMALIZATION.
3
D«TA OBTAINED FROM PUBLICATION BY THE COMPILER,CHECKED, BUT NOT APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR
D/TA OBTAINED FROM A CURVE WITH A DATA-POINT READERDATA CBTAINEO FRCH A CURVE WITH A DATA-POINT READER
BY K.F.MCGOWAN ET A L . , PUBLISHED I N
ORNL-CPX-1 ( 1 9 6 4 ) FOR REACTIONS WITH * N , F E , C O
ORNL-CPX-2 ( 1 9 6 4 ) FOR REACTIONS WITH N I , CU
N U C L . D A T A , A l , 2 0 3 ( 1 9 6 6 ) FCR REACTIONS WITH L I t B E , B
N U C L . D A T A , A 2 , l ( 1 9 6 6 ) FOR REACTIONS WITH C
NUCL.DATA,A3,123 ( 1 9 6 ? ) FCR REACTIONS KITH N,C

18

730426FACILITY(COCKCROFT-WALTON ACCELERATOR)(LINEAR ACCELERATOR)(VAN DE GRAAFF}(TANDEM VAN DE GRAAFF)ICYCLOGRAAFF)(CYCLOTRON)(SYNCHROTRON)(ISOCHRONOUS-CYCLOTRON, AVF-CYCLOTRON)(SYNCHROCYCLOTRON)(^ICROTRON)(DYNAMITRON)

3
3
3
3
3

3
3

62
Annex 3
DICTION
RANGE
DECAY
ANGD

ADDITIONAL RESULTS/RELATED REFERENCES(RANGE OF RECOILS. MEASURED)(DECAY PROPERTIES OF THE PRODUCT NUCLIDE)(ANGULAR DISTRIBUTION)
CODES USED IN SF1 OF 'REL-REF*

SC
N

DICTION
CCINC
ACTIV
REC
HE JET
CHSEP
ASEP
SITA
STTA
MCNSEPMCNMIX
EDEG
INTB
EXTB
BCINT

DICTION
GLASO
TRD
SCLST
GELI
SCIN
CSICR
NAICR
LONGC
PROPC
TELES
FISCH
BPAIP
3ENUC
IOCH
CCIN

REFERENCE *U5f;D IN THE EVALUATIONCRITICAL REMARKSNOTEt SEE FREE TEXT

21

730426METHOD(COINCIDENCE):(ACTIVATION):(CROSS SECTIONS CR YIELDS C5TERMINED EY THE COLLECTION
CF RECOILS)(COLLECTION BY HE-JET)(CHEMICAL SEPARATION)(SEPARATION BY MASS SEPARATOR)(SINGLE TARGET IRRADIATIONS)(STACKED TARGET IRRAQIAT IONS )(SEPARATE MONITORFOIL)(MIXED MONITOR) MONITOR AND TARGET COMBINED AS CHEMICALCOMPOUND OR MIXTURE OR MONITOR REACTION HAS THE SAMETARGET NUCLTOE AS THE REACTION.GIVEN UNDER 'REACTION 1 .
(ENERGY-DEGRADATION BY FOILS) ENERGY-DEGRADATION OF
THE BEAM BEFORE HITTING THE TARGET ARRANGEMENT.
(IRRADIATION WITH INTERNAL B(IRRACIATIGN WITH EXTERNAL SEAM)(BEAM CURRENT INTEGRATED) COOL USED ONLY IF VALU5S
GIV£N IN THE DATA SECTION ARE BASED ON THIS MEASUREMENT

22730426DETECTORS(GLASS DFTFCTCR)(TRACK DETECTOR) ALL feHICH ARE NOT GLASS(SGLIC-STATE 03TECTCR)(GERMANIUM-LITHIUM OETC-CTCR)(SCINTILLATION DETECTOR)(CESIUM-IODIDE CRYSTAL)(SODIUM-IODIDF. CRYSTAL)(LONG COUNTER)(PROPORTIONAL COUNTER)(COUNTER TELESCOPE)(FISSION CHAMBIfR)(ELECTRON-PAIR SPECTROMETER)FOR GAMMAS(GEIGER MUELLER COUNTER)(IONIZATION CHAMBER)(COINCIDENCE COUNTER ARRANGEMENT) CODE AND DETECTOR(S)USED MUST BE GIVEN SEPARATED BY SLASH(ES)

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

63
Annex 3

DICTION23

73 122ANALYSIS.

AREA{AREA ANALYSIS)INTANG{INTEGRATION OF ANGULAR DISTRIBUTION)

DICTIONEN^COMMENT**
EN-APR X
EN-CMEN-MIN
EN-CM-MIN
EN-MX
EN-CM-MAX
EN-ERR

EN-ERR1
EN-ERR2+EN-ERR-EN-ERR
EN-NRMEEl
E2
E-APRX
E-CM

6-MIN
E-CM-MIN
E-MAX
E-CM-MAX
E-RSL
E-ER&
+E-ERR-E-EPR
E-EXC
OATA
OATA-APRXOATA-MIN
DATA-MAX
DATA-ERR
DATA-ERR1
0ATA-ERR2
DATA-ERR2•DATA-EFR-DATA-ERR
RATIO

RATIO-MIN
RATIO-MAX-

24

751110 DATA-HEADING KEYWORDSINCIDENT NEUTRON ENERGY, LA8-SYST£M
A3
THE MEANING OF THE CODE ' E N 1 SHOULD BE EXTENDED TO•ENERGY OF INCIDENT PROJECTILE", LAB-SYSTEM*. THISEXTENSION SHOULD ALSO APPLY TO THE OTHER CODES, WHICHCONTAIN ' 6 N 1 , LIKE ' E N - C M * .
APPROXIMATE VALUE CF INCIDENT NEUTRON ENERGY
A3INCIDENT NEUTRON ENERGY, C-M-SYSTEM
A3A3LCW L I M I T CF INCIDENT N-ENCRGY RANGE, LAe-SYSTEM
A3LCW L I M I T OF INCIDENT N-EN5RGY RANGE, C-M-SYSTEM
A3
HIGH L I M I T OF INCIDENT M-ENER6Y RANGE, LAB-SYSTHM
A3
HIGH L I M I T OF INCIDENT N-ENERGY RANGE, C-M-SYSTEM
S3
T:RROR OF MONOCHROMATIC INCIDENT-NEUTRON ENERGY OR
3
UNCERTAINTY OF THE CENTRAL ENERGY I N AN INCIDENT
NEUTRON-SPECTRUM.
ENERGY ERROR, I F MORE THAN ONE ERROR I S GIVEN.
B3
EXPLANATION UNOER •ERR-ANALYS'.
3
SECOND ENERGY ERROR, I F MORE THAN ONE ERROR IS G I V E N . 33
EXPLANATION UNDER •ERR-ANALYS'
3+ UNSYMMETRIC ENERGY-ERROR
B3- UNSYMMETRiC 6NF.RGY-ERR0P
B3
NORMALIZATION ENERGY. TO BE USED WHEN A DATA SET I S
3NORMALIZED TO ONE ENERGY ONLY.
3
ENERGY OF OUTGOING PARTICLE, LAB-SYSTEM
E3ENERGY OF OUTGOING PARTICLE, AS DEFINED IN BIB-SECT'N E3
ENERGY CF OUTGOING PARTICLE, AS DEFINED I N BIB-SECT'N E3
APPROXIMATE VALUE GF OUTGOING PARTICLE ENERGY,LAB-SYS E3E3ENERGY OF OUTGOING PARTICLE, C-M-5YSTEM
E3
LOW L I M I T OF OUTGOING-PARTICLE E-RANGE, LAB-SYSTEM
E3
LOW L I M I T OF OUTGOING-PARTICLE E-F.ANGE, C-M-SYSTfcM
E3
HIGH L I M I T OF OUTGOING-PARTICLE E-fUNGE , LAB-SYSTEM£3
HIGH L I M I T OF OUTGOING-PARTICLE E-RANGG, C-M-SYSTEMF3OUTGOING-PARTICLE ENERGY-RESCLUT10N
F3CUTGOING-PARTICLE ENERGY-ERRORF3+UNSYMMETRIC OUTGOING-PARTICLE ENERGY-ERRORF3-UNSYMMETRIC OUTGOING-PARTICLE ENERGY-ERROR
E3
EXCITATION-ENERGYa
HEADING FOR COLUMN GIVING THE QUANTITY SPECIFIEDUNDER •ISO-QUANT* OR 'REACTION*.
3
APPROXIMATE VALUE OF DATUM
3
LOW L I M I T OF DATUM
3
HIGH L I M I T OF DATUM
DATA-ERROR. EXPLANATION TO BE GIVEN UNDER 'ERR-ANALYS 1
FIRST DATA-ERROR, I F MORE THAN ONE ERROR-COL IS GIVEN. •a
EXPLANATION UNDER •ERR-ANALYS'
3
SECOND DATA-ERROR f IF MORE THAN CN£ ERROR-COL I S GIVEN. 3
EXPLANATION UNDER 'ERR-ANALYS•
3
THIRD DATA-ERROR, I F MORE THAN ONE ERROR-COL IS GIVEN. 3
EXPLANATION UNDER •ERR-ANALYS'
3• LNSYMMETRIC DATA-ERROR. EXPLANATN UNDER # ERR-ANALYS' 3- UNSYMMETRIC DATA-ERROR. EXPLANATN UNDER 'ERR-ANALYS' 3
HEADING FOR COLUMN GIVING THE RATIO SPECIFIED UNDER
3• I SO-QUANT* OR 'REACTION' OR THE CUANTI1Y/STANDARD
RATIO.
L O V L I M I T OF RATIO.3
HIGH L I M I T OF RATIO
3

64
Annex
DICTION

24-

75111

DATA-HEADING KEYWORDSRATIO-ERR
RMIC-ERRORRATIO-EP.R1 FIRST RATIO-ERROR, I F f4ORE THAN ONE RATIO-ERROR 15
G I V E N . EXPLANATION UNDER •fRR-ANALYS 1
RATXO-ERR2 SECOND PATlO-ERROR t I T MORE THAN ONE RATIO-ERROR I S
G I V E N . EXPLANATION UNDER '£RR-AN*LY5«•RATIO-ERR +UNSYMMETRIC RATIO-ERROR. EXPLnUT"4 UNDER 'ERR-ANALNS 1-RATIO-ERR -UNSYMMF.TRJC PATIC-cRRCR. E X P L A N A T N UNDER 'cRR-ANALYS*SUM
HEADING FGR COLUMN GIVING THE SUM SPECIFIED UNDER• REACTION 1 .
SUM-ERR
SUV-ERROR. TX^LANATICN TO BE GIV&N UNDER 'ERR-ANALYS 1+SUM-ERR+UNSYMM&TRIC SUM-ERROR. EXPLANATION UNDER 'ERR-ANALYS*-SUM-ERR-UNSYMMETRIC SUM-ERROR. EXPLANATION UNOSR 'ERR-ANALYS'
MOMT
HfcADINC- FCR THE COLUMN GIVING VALUES FOR TH£ MONITOR.
FLAG
FLAG. WEANING OF FLAGS GIVcN UNDER THIS HEADING TO BE
EXPLAINED I N BIB-SECTION UNDER ' F L A G *MISCHEADING FGR A COLUMN WITH SUPPLEMENTAPY INFORMATION
FOR WHICH NO DATA-HEADING KEYWORD HAS BEEN DEFINED.
EXPLANATION TC BE GIVEN UNDER ' ^ I S C - C C L 1 KEYUCRD
MISC1FIRST MISCELLANEOUS COLUMN - IF MORE THAN ONE I S GIVEN
SAME USAGE AS - H I S C - ( S E E AEOVE)MISC2SECOND MjfSCELLANSOUS COLUMN - I F MORE THAN ONS I S GIVEN
SAME USAGI5 AS - M I S C - ( 5 E E ABOVE)MISC3THIRD MISCELLANEOUS COLUMN - I F N'ORS THAN ON£ I S -GIVEN 3
SAME USAGE AS -MISC-CSEE ABOVE)
5
NOTE= THE CHARACTERS AND DIGITS I N COL.£6 ARE USED FOR 3
COMPUTERIZED CHECKING OF COLUMN-SEQUENCE. SEE
3
MANUAL.
3

65
Annex

DICTION

25

750715DATA UNIT KEVWDRDS= N0T£= THE UNIT 'PER-CENT ' IS NOTTO BE USED UNDER TH<E HEADINGS• D A T A ' , ' R A T I O ' AND D E R I V A T I V E S
3ER-CfcNT
PC/Fir,
NO-DIM
ARB-UNITS
SEE Tfc'XT

DEVICE BY 100 AND USE 'NO-DIM'
PERCENTPERCENT PER FISSIONNO DIMENSION
ARBITRARY UNITS TO 3£ COMBINEDM T H THE ' R E L ' MODIFIER IN THE
ISO-QUANT.

MILLI-MU
ANGSTROMKB
B
MB

MICRC-E

3

RARE UNITS fcHlCH ARE NOT CODEC
BUT USED UNDER

GEV
MEV
KEV
SV
3EV/C
YR
D
HR
MIN
SEC
MSEC
MICROScC
NSEC
M
CM
MM

NFY
NO

'MISC

3
3

ONLY
1:

ELECTRON-VOLTSGGV PER LIGHT VELOCITYYEARS (=365.2422 DAYS)
DAYS
HOURS
MINUTES <NOT ANGULAR)SCCONOS (NOT AMGULAR)BILLISECONDSMICR03ECCND3NANOSECCNDSMICROMETERS, MICRONSI" U L I-MICRONSKILCSARNSBARNSMILLISARNSMICROBARNS

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

E
E

E/C

TIME
TIME
TIME
TIME
TIME
TIME
TIME
TIME
L
L
L
1.
I.
1.
B
E)
B
B

l.E+93l.E+63l.E+33l.E+033

2.1556S3E+73
8.64E+43
3.6E+33
e.E+12l.E+03l.E-23l.E-63l.E-93l.E+02l.E-23l.E-33l.E-63
1.E-S3l.E-102l.E+32l.E+03l.E-33l.E-63

67
Annex 4
Status Report of IBT

Charged Particle Group of theInstitute of Nuclear Research Statement

The Nuclear Data Group of the Institute of Nuclear Researchstarted its activity in the begining of 1976. This activity has been directed towards the compilation and evaluationof certain types of charged particle data and selected
neutron nuclear data.
At present the Nuclear Data Group has a staff of 6 physicists
constituing three subgroups. Theirs main interest concerns
thermal and resonant neutron data, fast neutron data andcharged particle nuclear data, respectively. The split into
three groups is a consequence of the fact that the Nuclear
Data Group members are the employees of three independent
departments of the Institute of Nuclear JResearch, namely
the Reactor Calculation Division, the Nuclear Reaction Dpt
and the Dpt of Physics of the Atomic Nucleus»
The Charged Particle Nuclear Data group has started withcompilation of the (vSt) reaction data. This choice wassubstantiated by the role, which the (Pi^) reaction plays
in applications of (charged particle,T") reactions in nuclear analysis Plf2j and the scarcity of complete, new and68
Annex 4

specialized compilations of the (p»V) reaction data.
The experience we have gained in experimental investigation of the radiative proton capture emboldens us to continue evaluating the recommended data.
In respect to bibliography we rely on the "Reaction List"
and the "Recent References" lists.
The compiled experimental data include the resonance energies, resonance width or relative yield and the most intensive primary and secondary T^-ray energies as well as theirintensities. At present we are engaged in developing a
programme for extraction of the desired information fromthe experimental data, published usually in a form of adecay scheme, and in developing a format for the storageof the compiled data on a magnetic tape. Use will be madeof the EXFOR - system as far as possible.
We assume that most preferable to the users will be an output in the form of some kind of book or table sheets.
Retrievals in other form can also be provided to the users.
Charged Particle-Induced Radiative Capture, Proceedingsof a Panel, Vienna 9 - 1 3 October 1972, IAEA, Vienna 1974
|XJ Atomic Energy Review, Vol 12, Number 2, Vienna 1974

69
Annex 5
Status Report of Japanese Group
1) Regular contact with JAERI group has been established.
In the discussion it has been agreed that cooperation of two groups
should be started towards providing regular input of Japanese language
publications to existing bibliographic systems.

Details of thecooperation will be arranged in near future.
2) Nuclear Data Committee has been organized in the Nuclear Physics Divisionof the Physical Society of Japan.

Among the members of the committee

are Ikegami and Ohnuma from our group, Tsukada from JAERI, and Hasegawa
from the Institute for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo.
3) The description of NRDP-1, along with a short guide to present data
activities in the world, our plans and perspective, and request forcooperation, has been distributed among potential users in Japan.
4) Analysis of EXFOR and its comparison with NRDF-1 have been made.
Sample EXFOR input of differential CPND was written.

Proposals for

additions and modifications of EXFOR will be presented.
5) The outline of NRDF-2 are being discussed.
working system.

NRDF-2 will be an actually

Our first consideration in the design of the system

will be given to its compatibility with EXFOR.
NRDF-2 will hopefully be working at the end of this year.

Collectionof data will start from the end of this year or early next year.
Scope of our compilation will be: (l) all kinds of CPND produced inour country; and (2) CPND of specific reaction types produced in othercountries.

Ve are hoping to collect some 100 MB of information within

three years.

Support and cooperation of IAEA and other centers in thecollection of data will be greatly appreciated.

Exchange of our datawith other centers will possibly be complied with starting from 1977.
6) At the same time we will make effort to:i) keep close contact with the nuclear physics community in Japan,
until nuclear data compilation will be regarded as a part of physicists'
daily research activities which they are responsible for;ii) promote interest of young physicists in nuclear data compilationand thus prepare future compilers and evaluaters;iii) establish a permanent nuclear data center or an equivalent after
the three year period.

71
Annex 6
Brief NDS Report to the 1976 4C-4teeting

1.

STAFF
1.1

Since the last 4C-Meeting A. Calamand and J. Lemley left the Section.

1.2

New staff are: R. Lessler, who works on Wrenda and the targets-andsamples program.

R. Yaghubian. who has previously been working as atemporary consultant and has now a fixed-term appointment, works ondata compilation and request services. 0. Schwerer. who is also involved in data compilation and request services.
1.3

For 1977 a new physicist's post is likely to become available.

This will

be devoted to neutron data in order to cover the increasing workload ofdata request services.
1.4 A new unit for Atomic and Molecular Data for Fusion is envisaged for 1977
within the Nuclear Data Section.
2.

CHANGE OF PREMISES
2.1

In the new premises at Wasagasse, three kilometers away from the IAEA
main building, NDS was, for several months, separated from the computer.
Many compilation activities and request services got seriously delayed
during this period.

2.2 Meanwhile NDS has its own RJE station for card input and printer output,
linked to the Agency's computer by a telephone line. This serves mostof the needs of NDS except for magnetic tape handling. Repeatedly there
were difficulties resulting from transporting tapes to and back between
Wasagasse and computer.
2.3

Since the staff has to travel frequently between Wasagasse and Kamtnerring, NDS encounters an effective loss of manpower between 5 and 10 percent.

3.

CINDA
3.1

CIMDA75 and its Supplement were published.

The printing of CINDA.76 ispresently in a crisis, because the Ianotron machine at Frankfurt hasgiven up its ghost. Several other machines are presently under consideration. We still have the hope that the publication date of CINDA76
will be delayed not more than two weeks.
3.2

The Cinda coverage of areas 3 and 4 has been reported in Memo 4O-3/158
of 1976-3-4* There are no significant gaps except, perhaps, for some
USSR lab reports. A number of Cinda relevant articles from rare reportseries and theses has been found from INIS retrievals.

72
Annex 6
3.3

Considerable Cinda clean-up has "been done for area 3.

The Exfor dataindex lines are up to date. However, since much of the clean-up wasdone before the LINK operation 'became effective, we have the problem of
a disturbing number of duplications. Also a number of recent entries
made at NNCSC and NDCC for labs of area 3 could not yet be blocked
systematically.
3.4

At the 1975 INDC Meeting the two—years publication cycle of Cinda has
been approved for the 1976/77 period.

The centers have been urged how-ever, to issue in 1978 an archival volume which would remain valid for alonger period, supplemented by periodical issues for new literature only.
4.

EXFOR
4.1

Compilation of Exfor data continued. Presumably, NDS is quite complete
for newest data. However, the backlog accumulated during the 1974 period
when several posts were vacant, could not yet be worked off.

4.2

The Exfor check program and the Exfor Edit program for customers havebeen improved.

4.3

The NNCSC Exfor tapes converted from SCISRS-1 were quite important for
many data requests. However, not yet all of them have been worked into ourmaster file.

4.4

The Exfor/Cinda dictionaries were frequently updated, without delay, whenever a new code was introduced.

4.5

The NDS Exfor Manual is still maintained separately from the official
NNCSC Exfor Manual,though after the last NNCSC updates both Manuals
have again become more similar.

CUSTOMER SERVICES
5.1

CMDU-11, the new catalogue of data available from NDS, has been issued.
Its character has changed completely.

Previous issues of CINDU had indexed

Dastar and Exfor data in detail, a function which has now been taken overby Cinda.

The new issue of CINDU gives only more general information on

the numerical data libraries available, which include
experimental neutron data (5 libraries)
evaluated neutron data (ca. 15 libraries, depending on thedefinition of the term '^library")
photonuclear data (1 library)
charged-particle nuclear data (2 libraries)
nuclear structure and decay data (4 libraries).
5.2

The request statistics is attached. NDS now receives, on average, one
request per working day.

Out of these there are about

1 request per week for evaluated data
1 request per week involving retrievals from Exfor3 requests per week of more trivial nature requesti-ng a document
or a single data set.

73
Annex 6Compared to the calendar year 1974 (which admittedly was low due tovacant posts) the data request and dissemination statistics have about
doubled.
6.

EVALUATED DATA
6.1

Several new evaluated data files were received from the other centers
and are gratefully acknowledged.

6.2

The processing of evaluated data takes an increasing amount of time at
NDS, part of which could be saved if there were fewer mistakes in thedata transmitted.

6.3

NDS has started a file in Exfor format for selected importantevaluated data which are not part of one of the established evaluateddata libraries. The file has the name VISN (= various international
evaluated neutron data) and its accession numbers start with thecharacter V. VIEN data will be transmitted outside the normal Exfortransmission.

7.

DOCUMENTS
7.1

For a list of documents translated and/or distributed by NDS see
INDC(SEC)-53/U (June 1976).

8.1

The full report (planned as IWDC(HDS)~64) on the third IAEA evaluationof the 2200 m/s and thermal Maxwellian neutron data of the main fissile
isotopes, a summary of which had been presented at the 1975 Washington
Conference, could not be completed, mainly due to the less efficientworking conditions at Wasagasse.

8.2

The work on the review of threshold reactions for reactor neutron
dosimetry continues.

9.

WRENDA
9.1

WHENDA75 has been published in June 1975. WHENDA76 is being prepared.

9.2

New or changed requests have been received from Prance, Sweden, Switzerland,
Japan, UK, Germany F.R., Netherlands (all these through NDCC), Australia,
Bulgaria, German Dem.Rep.
The requests from USA and USSR remained mostly unchanged.

9.3

NNCSC and NEA transmitted the requests according to actions 21 and 22
from last 4C-*Ieeting.

75
Annex 7
Physics Department
Eansrss Hindu U n i v e r s i t y
Varanasi - 221CC5, I n d i a

A p r i l 1 6 , 1976
Dear Dr. Leranel,Thank you f o r your l e t t a r dated 'larch 2 2 , 1976 and t h e
r e p o r t I:!DC (r-DS) - 6 9 on t h e 1975 - e a t i n g on Charged P a r t i c l e
Nuclear Data'Compilation and t h e Exfcr Uanual D i c t i o n a r i e s . I
an indeed g r a t e f u l t o you f o r i n v i t i n g me t o t h e next meetingof CPITD group on 28-20. A p r i l 1976 and f o r t a k i n g such keen i n t e r e s t
i n my a c t i v i t i e s . I v;ish I could a t t e n d t h i s n e a t i n g however, t oarrange f o r t r a v e l funds i n I n d i a i s a hard ;job d e s p i t e t h e f a c t
t h a t you have t r i e d t o move I n d i a ' s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e t o IA3A a l l by
y o u r s e l f . I , on my s i d e , an t r y i n g t h e best I c a n , but i t w i l l be
r e a l l y g r e a t good luck i f I an able t o f i n d t r a v e l support i n suchs h o r t t i m e . Ho'.vaver, I am keeping my f i n g e r s c r o s s e d .
1 am giving belov? a b r i e f o u t l i n e regarding t h e proposedcompilation u h i e h , i f you t h i n k f i t , may be conveyed t o t h e C?"Dgroup meeting f o r t h e i r comments and s u g g e s t i o n s .
In t h e proposed compilation we plan t c p r e s e n t t h e n u m e r i c s !
r e s u l t s of angular d i s t r i b u t i o n measurements of ( d , d ) and ( d , o )stripping cross-sections and polarizations (iT n , , T^, . . . etc.) fora l l nuclei and at a l l incident deuteron energies for the period
196S-1S75. The (d,p) transition is characterised by the state(Excitation Energy and J*" ) in which the stripped neutron is
captured, and therefore at a particular incident dauteron energy
and for a target various angular distributions of the (d.p) reaction
characterised by the captured neutron state will be presented.
Just to give you an idea about the organisation of the datain our proposed compilation I am giving here a table (Table A)
which describes the contents of the compilation. This table of

76
Annex 7
contents will be followed by the tables of (d,p) stripping data
(Tables B , C ... ) .
This compilation has been undertaken in view of the importanceof (d,p) stripping data for nuclear structure studies. L'oreover,
it is felt that a conciliation of numerical naterial in the proposed
form is necessary with the recent introduction of a new editorial
policy by nuclear physics journals, to exclude publications of
exoerimental results in numerical form. This v?ill save considerable
time of other workers in collecting the data. Recently' v?e zanted
to do some coupled channel calculations for (d,p) stripping forchromium isotopes, and it took us around three months to collectthe data from the authors and from the plots available in thejournals. Collecting data fron the plots is really a tough job
as well as inaccurate. The present compilation will automaticallycomplete the compilation of neutron single particle states in nuclei.
The compilation is in yet a preliminary stage. The compilation of the references, their keywords abstracts, and. the Edrlracsssof the authors have been already completed. We are planning tosend a letter, one copy of which is enclosed herewith, to all theauthors, in which they are recuested to send to us the ds.ta available
7?ith them. I hone this letter will serve cur purpose. This letter•sill be printed after getting your approval and we v:ill start
despatching then to the authors.
I am not sure about the success of this compilation as it
depends upon the cooperation from a large number of authors.
Furthermore, the work needs more time than I am able to devote
since it is a side .vork. However, if authors cooperate, I hope
to finish it within six months.
I shall anxiously await your reply.

You
Yours sincerely,To
Dr. H.D. Lemmei
Nuclear Data Section
Division of Research & Laboratories
International Atomic Energy Agency
Vienna, Austria.

(D.C, Agrawal )Post-Doctoral Fellow

ERNATIONAL ATOMIC E N E R G Y A G E N C Y
AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE
MEKflYHAPOAHOE ATEHTC1BO HO ATOMHOfi 3HEPTMH
ORGANISMO 1NTERNACIONAL DE ENERGIA ATOMICA

77
Annex 7KARNTNER RING 11, P O BOX 590, A-1011 VIENNA, AUSTRIANUCLEAR DATA SECTION

Date:

Dear
The (d,p) stripping reaction has been of quite interest since its
importance was recognized by Butler in 195O« Keeping in view the various
approaches which are in progress for (d,p) stripping calculations and theimportance of these for nuclear structure study we are compiling thenumerical results of angular distribution measurements of the (d,d) and the(d,p) stripping cross sections and polarizations (iT11, T_2 .... etc.) for
all nuclei and at all incident deuteron energies for the period 1973 andonwards. This will save time of others in collecting the data. The International Atomic Energy Agency has shown keen interest in making available thepresent compilation either in the form of a report or it may be computerized.
We, therefore, request you to send us a copy of the tables of data (both published and unpublished) of your group in any form either as a laboratory
report, reprint, preprint, thesis or just in the form of tables. Even if
you have a single copy of it, please send it; we promise to return it back.
You are further requested to bring in our knowledge any other sources where
we may get these data. It is needless to add that due acknowledgement of
your cooperation will be made.
Please note that not only the numerical experimental results but alsodetails on the error analysis and, where applicable, values of reference
data used (standard cross-sections, half-lives, etc.) are important for thecompilation.
With best regards,
Tours sincerely,(D.C. Agrawal)

Note by editors
The draft circular l e t t e r as of
1976/4/16 has been replaced hereby the final one which was sent
to 134 addresses in Oct.1976.

Mailing Address:
D.C. Agrawal
Room 8, Barhar Kothi
Durga Eund
Varanasi-221005, IKDIASaaplea of the proposed
Table k.

()Excitation
Energy
(Me?)

10

10

Compilation of (d,p) stripping data

Type of

data

Table
Mo.

Refer*no*B

Huol.Phye.Ai96t225(1972)

1/2

810(CM)tt

5.3-130.9
5.3-131.0

30
30

0

••

.*

•*

..

.*

••

0.00
0.565

3/2

it 1 1»»

5,3-126.0
»•

29

D

29

F

0.00
0.565

3/2

V2

Table B

table D
SIG(CM)

OCM

7.8
10.4

5.3

6.0
8.7
10.7

5.3
7.8
10.4

126.0
130.9

0".189
0.182

13o!o

11

Error

0.217
0.185
0.157
*•

0.008
0.006
0.005

~O*.2O9-0.310

o!6i7

if

*
•

ft

•

©CM

- 4
CO

Ho.of
point*ft•

Energy

CO
M

0.018

*«

Nucl.Phys.A196,225(1972)

79
Annex 8Proposal for a CPND Bibliography
H. Behrens
ZAED«
ZAED is vri-lling to produce a CPND bibliography in a form of a
printed handbook or booklet. Cumulative volumes may also "bepublished (including the past).
The scope of the bibliography will include:a)integral cross sections,
excilation function, andthick target yieldsb)

All target nuclei with Z > 1c)

All possible nuclear reaction types.

This bibliography will be published in INIS-format. It will
include a bibliographic part as well as an abstract. The productionof this bibliography will be carried out by making first a query in
the IMS-System by using the relevant descriptors. The in thisspecial case remaining noise of about 75^ will be afterwards selectedout by hand in cooperation with the group of Prof. MUnzel. Furthermore a more detailed classification than in the INIS system contained will be introduced. At the end the bibliography will beclassified according toa)type of nuclear reaction (i.e. proton reactions, deuteronreactions etc.)

13"type of target nucleus ( another possibility would "be to list
the target nuclei in a subject index).

)

In addition to this classification the following indexes would becontained in the bibliography:a)Author Indexb)

Index of Cooperate Entriesc)Report Number Indexd)Subject Index

The first issue of our bibliography could be brought out in thefirst half of 1977.
A cumulative bibliography of the years before 1976 will be produced in a way different from those discussed above. A special
selection of the relevant references from the Charged Particle
Reaction List will be carried out by hand (5$ of the whole content only).

81
Annex 9Proposal for a CPND Bibliography
C. L. Dunford
NNCSC

The current "Reaction List" file and publication will be discontinued in thenext few months,

A final cumulative volume may

be published.

As of October 1,

NNCSC will assume full responsibility for the: compilation of a charged particle
bibliography of much restricted scope, but slightly more extensive than thatoutlined at the 1975 Consultants' Meeting.
1.

The data scope includeda) excitation functions to ground and metastable statesb) thick target yields

2.

For all targets Z > 1

3.

For all projectiles Z s 1, A £ 1

4.

For lowest projectile energies of 100 MeV or less5.

All publications whicha) are published after the: last Reaction Listb) contain data exchanged in CPND EXF0Rc) are journals, conference proceedings or laboratory reports

The file contents and structure will closely follow the present neutron (CINDA)
system but will incorporate additional features from the Reaction List.
a schematic card input format indicating file contents.

Attached is

There would be one entry foreach reaction and quantity given in a reference.
The literature coverage and coding of all entries would be done initially at
NNCSC.

Coverage control would be provided through regular retrievals from the Recent

References file and from reference lists provided by other centers (particularly
useful would be Russian literature with English keywords).

Should the scope of thecompilation expand then NNCSC might request assistance from other centers much as isdone with CINDA at present.
As with the literature coverage, NNCSC feels that it should take responsibility
for publication at least in the first few years of publication.
publish

NNCSC proposes toin a 6 x 9 inch format a cumulative bibliography on an annual basis.

Initially, copies would be supplied cost free to designated distribution centers.

82
Annex 9Apr. 8, 1976

Proposal for CPND...(contd)

As long as the number of total pages (copies x pages/copy) remains less than
100,000 NNCSC believes it can supply this service to the network.

CPND Bibliography Card Input Format

Card #1
Columns
1-71

Reaction Branch, Parameter(as in CPND EXF0R)

72

Compiler code

(as in CINDA)

73

Operational code

(as in CINDA)

74-79

Serial number

80

"A"

Card #2

1-3

Laboratory(as in CINDA)

4

Worktype(as in CINDA)

5-22

Reference(as in EXF0R)

23-30

Energy range(as in CINDA)

31-39

CPND EXF0R acession number(LNNNN.NNN)40

Hierarchy(as in CINDA)

41-43

Block number(as in CINDA)

44-72

First Author and comment(as in CINDA)

73

Operation code

(as in CINDA)

74-79

Serial number

80

"B"

83
Annex 9Initial List of Journals to Be Scanned

JournalAnn. Phys. (N.Y.)
Ann. Phys. (Paris)
Australian J. Phys.
Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR,
Phys. Ser.
Can. J. Chetn.
Can. J. Phys.
Compt. Rend. Ser. B.
Czech. J. Phys.
Helv. Phys. Acta
Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR,
Ser. Fiz.
J. Inorg. Nucl. Chen.
J. Phys. A.
J. Phys. (Paris)
J. Phys. Soc. Japan
Lett. Nuovo Cimento., Ser. 2
Nucl. Phys.
Nuovo Cimento
Particles and Nuclei
Physica Scripta
Phys. Letters
Phys. Rev.
Phys. Rev. LettersRadiochim. Acta
Rev. Mex. Fis.
Rev. Roum. Phys.
Sov. At. Energy
Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.
Ukr. Fiz. Zh. (Ukr. Phys. J.)
Yad. Fiz. (Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.)
Z. PhysikMemo CP-e/l

85
Annex 10(Note: This has not initially boon distributed as aformal CP—Memo but was referred to elsewhere under this code.)
Proposals for additions and modifications
1) It is proposed to give reaction type codes in the "BRANCH" subfieldof REACTION.
Reaction type codes are either formed from particle codes, for instance,
PG

for (p,T) reactions,DPfor (d,p) reactions,

HE3A

for ( He,a) reactions,

DNP

for (d,np) reactions,

PPG

for (p,p'V) reactions, etc.,

or chosen from DICTION-10.

Additions to DICTION-10 proposed are:RES

for resonance experiments;

1TRS

for single-nucleon transfer reactions in general,,12_ 13_,, ,16. 1 5such as ( C, C) and ( 0, NH)X ;nTRS(n=2,3,..)for n-nucleon transfer reactions in general,such as ( 0,0) and (p, Li).

2) Additions to DICTION-22 (DETECTORS) proposed.
MAGSP

magnetic spectrometer or spectrograph

PLATE

nuclear plates

PSOLST

position sensitive solid state detectors

SVPC

position sensitive single-wire proportional counters

MWPC

position sensitive multi-wire proportional counters3) Additions to DICTION-25 (UNITS) proposed.
MU-B/SRmicrobarns per steradian

N-B/SR

nanobarns per steradian(In DICTION-25 there are now MICRO-B, MUB/SS/MEV, acid MU-B/MEV.
The first two should be replaced by MU-B and MU-B/SR/MEV, respectively.)An alternative may be to assume certain prefix as universal UNIT
modifiers.

Possible examples areMD-

for 10" 6 ,N-

for 10~ 9 ,P-

for 1O" 1 2 ,F-

for 10" 1 5 .

Thus N-B/SR means nanobarns per steradian,, N-SEC nanoseconds, N-AMP
nanoamperes, etc.
4) Inclusion of some semi-numerical data should be considered in DATA-section.
Examples of semi-numerical data :
<0.01
1/2
7/2(blank) or X

in order to distinguish unknown values from 0.0.

86Annex 105) Technical or experimental information is included in BIB-section at the
moment.

Is it not better to have EXP-section and thus leave BIB-section

for purely bibliographic information?
6) In REACTION, outgoing particles separated by + signs should be understoodas(A) a positive indication of multiple emissionand (B) a positive indication that the sequence of the outgoingparticles is irrelevant or unknown.
Thus
i)

it is not necessary to write (P,D+G) etc., although gamma rays
are also emitted in many differential cross section measurements;ii)(D,P) should be enough, if only protons are detected, even in acase of (d,p) reaction leading to unbound states of the final nucleus;iii)

one writes, for example,(40-ZR-90(D,P)40-ZR-9l(N)40-ZR-90,...)
91(a) if neutron groups emitted from unbound states inZr
are measured,or (b) if neutrons are detected in coincidence with protongroups leading to certain unbound states of the91
intermediate nucleusZr,in other words,(c) if (d,p) reaction is known to precede the neutron emission;iv)

one writes(40-ZR-90(D,N)41-NB-9l(P)40-ZR-90,...)(a) if proton groups emitted from unbound states in91

Nb

are measured,or (b) if neutrons are detected in coincidence with protons
91
emitted from unbound states inNb,in other words(c) if (d,n) reaction is known to precede the proton emission;v)

one writes(40-ZR-90(D,N+P)40-ZR-90,....)(a) if the sequence is unknown,or (b) if deuteron breakup cross section in the field of90

Zris measured,or (c) in other cases where positive indication of two-particle
emission is required and the sequence is irrelevant
or unknown.

87

SAJCPLE EHTRT PRESEHTED BT DR. OHBUMA• ) Hote:
TRANS

This has not i n i t i a l l y I M M Ai«trlbut«d a s a ffrnal
onial

BIB
TITLE

<mUr Ul» eocU.

CP •••o bat M > r*fa
Z001
751119zooooooooooco

Z0001

751119Z00C1OO0OQO01

ZQ0O1QO1

751H9

zoooiooioooei

ENTRY

SUBENT

Annex 111217(P»D) REACTION AT 52 MEV. 1.58NI (P.DJ57NI (EX;:iER! MENT

Z000100100002
ZOOC1001000C3
Z00010010000<kZ000100100005
Z000100100006
Z000100100007
Z00010010000B
Z000100100009
BfclAM SPOT 3MM«5.5MM
Z000100100Q10
REACTION(28-Nl-58(P.D)28-NI-57,PD,DA,Di>EXP)
Z000100100011
DETECTOR 2(MAGSP.PR0PC,SCIN)
Z000100100012
COMMENT
2PRCPC IN KOCAL PLANE OF MAQSP GATED BY SCIN
Z000100100013
RESOLUTION=70 KEV» SOLID ANGLE=1.8 MSR
Z00010010001A
SAMPLE
99.8 PER CENT NI-58 SELF SUPPORT 2.7 KG/CMK*2^uuuIUUIUOUA3ZOOO1OO10OO3.5
ERR-ANALYS RELATIVE ERR=STATISTICAL/BG SUBTRACTION/PEAK SEPARATIONZ000100100016
ABS ERR= 20 PER CENT
Z000100100017
HISTORY(751H9C)
Z000100100018
7
ENDBIBI
Z000100100019
AD
AUTHOR(H.OHNUMA.T.SUEHIRO.M.SEKIGUCHI.S.YAMADA)INSTITUTE (ZJAPINS)REFERENCE <J.JpJr36>l236,7405)
FACILITY KSYNCYC.ZJAPINS)COMMENT
1ENS51.93 MEV, EN-RSLs^O KEV» AVERAGE EEAM 4oNA.

NOCOMMON

Z0001OO10002Q

ENDSUBENTSUBENT

18

Z000100199999

Z0001002

751U9

Z000100200001

NOBIB

Z000100200002

COMMONEN
EN-RSL
E-LVL
7E-LVL
MEV
KEV
MEV
MEV
40,
51.93
6.02
5.59
ENDCOMMON

8
E-LVL
E
8
MEV
0.Q0

0.76

1.10

2.56

DATA
ANG-CM
DATA-ERR
DATA-ERR
ADEG
MB/SR
MB/SR
6.0
0.02
0..02
8..0
0.02
0.02
10.6
0.02
0.02
ENDDATA

13
3DATA-ERR
6DATA-ERR

3DATA-CM
6DATA-CM

4-DATA-ERR
7DATA-ERR

40ATA-CM
70ATA-CM

MB/SR
MB/SR

MB/SR
MB/SR

MB/SR
MB/SR

MB/SR
MB/SR

6

lE-LVLMEV

4E-LVL

5E-LVL

MEV

MEV

Z0001OO20O003
6Z000100200004
Z000100200005
Z000100200006
Z000100200007
Z00O1O0200008
Z000100200009
Z000100200010

15

Z000100200011
5Z000100200012
8Z000100200013
Z00010020001A
Z00O1OO20O015
Z000100200016
Z000100200017
Z000100200018
ZOC0100200019
Z000100200020
Z000100200021
Z000100200022
Z000100200023
Z00010020002ft
Z000100200025
Z000100200026
Z000100200027

ENDSUBENT

26

Z000100299998

ENDDJTRY

2

Z000199999999

DATA-CM
5DATA-CM
8
MB/SR
MB/SR
5.37
3.43

0.06
0.04

1.06
2.46

0.02
0.04

1.04
0.69

2.86

0.05
0.04

1.00
1.16

C.02
0.O3

0.95
0.67

3.85
2.57

0.05
0.04

0.92
0.51

0.02
0.02

0.73
0.64

88
Annex 11

ENTRY

Z0002

7511197.000200000001

SUHENT

Z000200175]119Z000200100001

BIB
TITLE
AUTHOR
INSTITUTE
REFERENCE
FACILITYHISTORY

67
A STUDY OF 50V USING THE DIRECT REACTIONS 49TI(3HE»D>
AND 51VCD.T)(A.SQURKES»H,OHNUMA»N.M.HINTZ)(1USAMIN)<J>MPlAf217»438t73)(VDST>1USAMIN>(751119C)
7

ENDBIB

7.000200100002
Z000200100003
Z000200100004
Z000200100005
Z000200100006
7.000200100007
Z0O020OlOn008
Z0002001O0C09
Z000200100C10
7-000200100011

NOCOMMON10ENDSUBENTSUBENT

Z0002002

751119Z0002C0200001

47Z0002002Q0002
Z000200200003
Z000200200004
Z0002o02000fl5
Z0OO2OO2OnO06
Z000200200007
Z000200200008
Z000200200009
Z000200200010

BIB
REACTION
DETECTORCOMMENTSAMPLEENDBIB<22-TI-49<HE3»D)23-V-50JHE3DIDA»D»»EXP>

KMAGSP.PLATE)
lRtSOLUTI0N = 2() KEV> PLATE COVF.RED BY POLYETHYLENE
100 MU-G/CM»*2 THICK SELF SUPPORTING FOILCOMPOSITION OF TI-4-9 TARGET IN PF.R CENT
Tl-46
TI-47
TI-48
Ti-49
TI-50
2.0
1.8
18.8
75.7
1.7
7

COMMONEN
MEV
22.0
ENDCOMMON

E-LVL
KEV
0,0

DATA
ANG-CM
DATA-ERR
ADEG
MU-B/SR
10.1
20.
20.2
20.
ENDDATA

DATA-CM
4DATA-CM
MU-B/SR
MU-B/SR
960,
520.
860.
420,

ENDSUBENTSUBENT
BIB
REACTION
DETECTORCOMMENTSAMPLEENDBIB

Z000200199999

62E-LVL
KEV
225.
3
11
2DATA-ERR
5DATA-ERR

3
3E-LVLKEV
321.

4E-LVL
KEV
356.

5E-LVLKEV
390,

2DATA-CM
5DATA-CM
MU-B/SR
MU-B/SR
730.
450.
630.
350.

3DATA-ERR
6DATA-ERR
MU-B/SR
MU-B/SR
20.
20.
20.
20.

3DATA-CM
6
MU-B/SR

Z000200200011
6Z000200200012
Z000200200013
Z000200200014
Z000200200015

8Z000200200016
4Z000200200017
Z000200200018
ZOC0200200019
Z000200200020
Z000200200021
Z000200200022
Z000200200023
Z000200200024
Z000200200025

24

Z000200299999

MU-B/SR
20.
20.
20.
20.

ZQ002003

640.
540.

751119Z00020O3O0001

45(23-V-51(D,T)23-V-50,DT,DA.T,,EXP)
1(MAGSP»PSOLST)
1THREE 1 CM * 3CM # 700 MU-M POSITION SENSITIVE DETECTORS IN THE FOCAL PLANERESOLUTION^ KEV
CARBON BACKED NATURAL V. 80 MU-G/CM«»2
5

COMMONEN
MEV
19.5
ENDCOMMON

E-LVL
KEV
0.0

6
2E-LVL
KEV
228.
3

3
3E-LVLKEV
321.

4E-LVLKEV
357.

5E-UVL
KEV
387.

DATA
ANG"CM
DATA-ERR
ADEG
MU-B/SR
15.3
17.
18.6
27.
ENDOATA

DATA-CM
4DATA-CM
MU-B/SR
MU-B/SR
234.
567,
432,.
765.

11
2DATA-ERR
5DATA-ERR
MU-B/SR
MU-B/SR
15.
18.
25.
28.
8

2DATA-CM
5DATA-CM
MU-B/SR
MO-8/SR
345.
678.
543.
876.

3DATA-ERR
6DATA-ERR
MU-B/SR
MU-B/SR
16.
1?.
26.
29.

3DATA-CH
6
MU-B/SR

656.

Z000200300002
Z000200300003
ZOOO20O300004
Z00020030000S
Z000200300006
Z000200300007
Z000200300008
Z000200300009
6Z000200300010
Z000200300011
Z000200300012
Z000200300013
Z000200300014
4Z00020030001S
Z000200300016
Z000200300017
Z000200300018
Z000200300019
Z000200300020
Z000200300021
Z000200300022
Z000200300023

ENDSUBENT

22

Z000200399999

ENDENTRY

3

Z000299999999

89
Annex 11
ENTRY

Z0003

76C2C67.0003O00010O1

SURENT

Zu0n3001

76,'.2G6

7.000300100001

BIB

10
IB
TITLE
(P»D) REACTIONS INDUCED BY A POLARIZED PROTON BEAM
AUTHOR<B. M A Y E R , J.GOSSET>J.l.ESCUDIF.iH. KAMITSUBO)
INSTITUTE (2FR SACZJAPIPC)REFERENCE <k»JPCR-CYCLQTRON-REPoRT-12,7106)
FACILITV 1(ISOCYC)COMMENTlEN=lfi.6-24,5 MEV, BEAM POLARIZAT ION NORMALLY ABOUT HO
PLR CENT. BEAM POL MOIlITORED BY CARP.UN POLARIMETER,AVERAGF BEAM 5 fi-AMP. FOR FURTHL R DETAILS OF EXP SEE
PHYS, REV. 184(1969) 1217.
DETECTOR 2(i>0LST,TELES)COMMENT2S1XTEEN DE-E TELESCOPES OK SI-DL-TECTHPS
SULID ANGLE 1.1 MSR, AN6 RESOL D.6 DtG
OVERALL ENERGY RESOLUTION 80 TO 150 KEV
ERR-ANAl.YS PURELY STATISTICAL.
ERRORS IN ABS CROSS SUCTIONSESTIMATED TO BE 10 PER CENT, ARISING PRIMARILY FROMDIFFERENCES IN SOLID ANGLES AND DETECTOR EFFICIENCIESAND NOT AFFECTING ASYM.
HISTORY(760206C)
ENDBIB
18

7.000300100C02
Z000300100003
7.000300100004
zooo3ooionon5
Z0003001O00P6
Z0003C01O0007
Z00030010000B
Z000300100009
7-000300100010
Z000300100011
Z000300100012
7.000300100013
Z000300100014
Z000300100015
7.000300100016
Z000300100017
7.000300100016
7.OO03O01O0019
Z0003001U0020
Z00030010002]

NOCOMMQN

Z0003001000?2

21

ENDSUBENTSUBENT

BIB
REACTIONSAMPLEENDBIB

Z0003002

MEV
24.5
ENDCOMMONDATA
ANG-CM
DATA-ERR
ADE6
NO-DIM
16.6
0.01
20.2
0.02
22.6
0.03
ENDDATABIB
REACTIONSAMPLEENDBIB

E-LVL
MEV
0.0

16.6
ENOCOMMDN
DATA
AN6-CM
AOEG
15.0
20.7
25.3
110.5
115.5
119.8
125.7
ENDDATA

5
3E-LVLMEV
0.78

3
4E-LVLMEV
1.12

5E-LVL

DATA-CM
5DATA-CM
NO-DIM
NO-DIM
0.11
-0,13
0.14
-0.06
0.22
0,0

9
3DATA-ERR
6DATA-ERR
NO-DIM
NO-DIM
0.01
0.01
0-01
0.01
0.01
0.01

3
3DATA-CM
6
NO-DIM

4DATA-ERR

4DATA-CM

NO-DIM

NO-DIM

MEV
2.59

10

Z000300200C11
5Z000300200C12
7.000300200013
7.000300200C14
Z000300200C15
Z000300200016
Z000300200017
Z000300200018
Z000300200019
Z000300200020
Z000300200021
Z000300200022

21

Z000300299999

Z0003003

-0-19
0.17

0.03

-0-20

0.01

0.03

-0-10

760206

Z000300300001

22(2#-NI-6l(P.D)28-NI-60»PD,ASY,D, ,EXP)
79.« PER CENT Nl-61 SELF SUPPORT 4.0 MG/CMK»2

2
E-LVL
MEV
1.33

Z000300200002
ZC00300200003
7.000300200004
Z000300200005
ZOO03002O00Ob
Z000300200007
Z000300200C08
Z000300200C09
Z000300200C10h

3

COMMONEN
MEV

ZC003oo200001

2

ENDSUBENTSUBENT

7612062
2(28-NI-58(P>D)28-NI-58,PD,ASY,C, ,EXP)
99-95 PER CENT NI-58 SELF SUPPORT n.8 MG/CMK*2

COMMONEN

7.000300199999

337E-LVLMEV
2.16

8

Z000300300006
Z000300300007
Z000300300008
Z000300300009
Z000300300010

357DATA-ERR
NO-DIM
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.09

7
7DATA-CM
NO-DIM
0.01
-0.08
-0.06
-0.12

Z000300300002
Z000300300003
Z000300300004
Z00O3OO30OO05

9

Z0OOSOO300O11
ZOOOS00300012
Z000300300013
Z0003003000U
Z000300300013
Z0003003O001*
Z000300300017
Z000300300018
Z000300300019
Z0OO30030OO20
Z0OOIO0300021

ENDSUBENT

20

Z000S00399999

ENDENTRY

2

Z000399999999

DATA-CM
NO-DIM
0,06
0,07
0,03
-0,05
-0,12
-0.2s
-0.51

8DATA-ERR
NO-DIM
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.10

8

90
Annex 11
ENTRY

Z0004

7602067.000400000001

SUBENT

Z0004C01

7602067.000400100001

1329
7.000400100002
SPIN-FLIP PROBABILITIES VIA ISOEARIC ANALOGUE RF;S[)NANCEZ00040OlOOfiO3
S If! 50TI(P»P)50TI INELASTIC SCATERIhG
7.000400100004(T.I1OJIRI .H.TOYAMA)
7.000400100005
AUTHOR<iiJApTIT,ZJAPTUE )7.00 040010 0006
INSTITUTE(J.JPJ. 37.1479,7412)
7.000400100007
REFERENCE(<?2-Tl-50(P'P)22-Tl-5o(G)22-TI-50>!NL/RES,SFP>P/G, jilXP) 7.000400 lOOOfif!
REACTION
Z0004C0100009
FACILITY 1(VDG,2JAPTIT)
1EU = 3.588-3.606, EN-RSL = O.Gl PER CENT, EN-STEP = KFV
Z00040C100010
COMMENTAVERAGE BEAM = 0.5 MU-AI-1P
7.000400100011
2(S/LST)
Z00O40010C01?
DETECTOR 3(UAItR)
Z000400100013
2(P) INEL SCATT PROTONS VIA IAR
Z000400100014
PART-DET 3(fi) 1.55 MEV GAMMA FROM 1ST 2* IN TI-50
7.000*001000.15
2THREE SI DETECTORS IN COIIIC WITH 5INK4IN NAItTL) PLACrDZ000400100016
COMMENTPERPENDICULAR TO SCATT PLANE,
Z000400100017
SULID ANG=1.3 MSR» HALF AN6=1.2 DEGREE
Z000400100018
3 N A K T L ) IN CO INC WITH I MEL SCATT PROTONS
Z000400100019
Z000400100020
SULID AUG=91 M5R> HALF AUG=3.5 DEGREESAMPLE(^2-TI-OXI) 10 MU-G/CM»»,? ENRICHED TI-50 OH C
Zooo'»ooiono2i
ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION (PER CENT)
Z000400100022
TI-46
TI-47
TI-48
TI-49
TI-50
Z000400100023
2.7
2,48
24,1
2,99
67.72
7.000400100024
ERR-ANALYS UNCERTAINTY INCLUDES
7.000400100025
AMBIGUITY IN GAMMA-DETECTOR EFFICIENCY
Z000400100026
AMBIGUITY IN BACK GRD SUBTRACTION
Z000400100027
AMBIGUITY IN ACC CO INC SUBTRACTION
Z000400100028
STATISTICAL ERRORS
Z0004OO100C29
ERRORS DUE TO FINITE ANGLES OF DETECTORS MUCH SMALLER Z000400100030
THAN STATISTICAL ERRORS
Z000400103031
HISTORY(760206)
Z0004Q0101032
ENDBIB
30
Z000400100033
BIB
TITLE

Z00040010n03A

NOCOMMONENDSUBENTSUBENTBIB
MISC-COL
ENDBIB

33
Z0004002

Z000400199999
Z000400200001

7602C6

Z000400200002
ZOOO4OO2OOO03
Z000400200004
Z000400200C05

1
2(HISCD SPIN-FLIP PROBABILITIES(MISC2) ERROR OF MISC1
2COMMONEN
MEV
3.588
ENDCOMMON

EN-RES
MEV
11.575

6
SPIN J
H-BAR
2.5
3

DATA
ANG
A-DEG
45.0
60.0
?5,0
90.0
ENDDATAMISCiNO-DIH
28,5
27.3
29.5
29.5

MISC2
NO-DIM
4.0
3.0
4.0
3.5

3
PARITY
NO-DIM-1.

E-LV-INI
MEV
1.55

E-LVL-FIN
MEV
o.O

Z000400200006
7.000400200007
Z00040020000B
Z000400200009
Z000400200010
Z000400200011
2000400200012
Z000400200013
ZOOOA00200014
Z000ft00200015
ZOOOA00200016
Z000ft00200017
ZO0OA0020O01B

ENDSXJBENT13ZOOOA002999'J9

ENDENTRY

2Z000A99999999

ENOTRANS

2

9999999999999

91
Annex 12MEMO CP-C/1

From:

V. McLane May, C. Dunford

Subject:

CPND Dictionaries

Reference:

CP-B/1 also known as KACHAPAG Information #1
Memo 4C-3/160

We believe that EXF0R dictionaries 10-14 should be left unmodified, andthat new dictionaries be added which correspond to usage in specific fields
for the keyword REACTION. We believe that this procedure will ease theadoption of the keyword REACTION in the neutron EXF0R. We also believe thatthe assignments to the various dictionaries were not logical. We propose
the following new dictionaries which could eiasily be expanded to handle neutron
data.
Dictionary 15:(Data type)

EXP
THE0
EVAL
REC0M

Dictionary 26: ((Processes), other than those specified by a combinationof particles).
N0N
ABS
EL
INL
*

If (p,p) is taken to mean total scattering.

Dictionary 27:

PAR
PR
DL
CN
DI
M+

M(M)
BIN
TER
IND
CUM
(CUM)

Branch92
Annex 12
Dictionary 28: (Quantity)
**
EM
SIG
TTY
YLD**
**
Have combined GEM, PEM, AEM, TEM into single emission quantity EM andhave combined FY and PY into single quantity YLD. Remainder of reaction
code should be sufficient to distinguish these.

Dictionary 29 :Modifiers

RAW
REL
FCT
AV
Dictionaries 16-23
The introduction of six character codes introduces complications into all
our processing codes. We do not see the need to expand to six characters,
since the limit of intelligible 5-character codes is not anywhere near being
reached.
The purpose of the codes is to be machine identifiable. The use of
easily recognizable codes is meant to help the compiler, not the user.

Dictionary 24:(Data-heading Keywords)

There is presently an EXF0R proposal to drop the keywords RATI0 (andassociated keywords). This was needed in EXF0R for use with the IS0-QUANT
separater ',' which allowed a ratio and its normalized cross section to be
coded in the same entry. With the addition of pointers, there is no longer
a need for distinguishing between DATA and RATI0. This would also pertain
to the keyword SUM.

Sol PearlsteinlhDistribution:

H. Munzel, KACHAPAG
L. Sokolovskij, CAJad
L. Lesca, NDCC
V. Manokhin, CJD
J.J. Schmidt, NDS
NNCSC(5 copies)(5 copies)(5 copies)(5 copies)(5 copies)