＜業績目録＞
氏名：羽倉信宏
所属：国立研究開発法人 情報通信研究機構（NICT） 未来 ICT 研究所
脳情報通信融合研究センター（CiNet）主任研究員
第 1 著者，もしくは，責任著者となっている論文について被引用数の合計（a のリストのうち、25，23、22、21、20、19、18、15、11、8、7、3、2 の合計）：546 回
参照：https://scholar.google.co.jp/citations?user=unoswJ4AAAAJ&hl=ja
a. 外国語による論文・著書（分担執筆を含む）（※主要業績）(*：責任著者、#：共同筆頭著者)
26. Watanabe, Y., Ban, H., Hagura, N., & Ikegaya, Y. * (2023) Intestelligence: A
pharmacological neural network using intestine data. bioRxiv.
https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.15.537044

25. ※ Ogasa, K., Yokoi, A., Okazawa, G., Nishigaki, M., Hirashima, M., & Hagura
N.* Decision uncertainty as a context for motor memory. (2023). bioRxiv.
https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.15.532761

24. Onagawa, R. *, Muraoka, Y., Hagura, N., & Takemi, M. * (2023).
Neurofeedback training for improving motor performance in healthy adults: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroImage 270, 120000.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120000

23. Hagura, N.*, Esmaily, J., & Bahrami, B. (2023). Does decision confidence
reflect effort? PLoS One, 18, e0278617.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278617
22. De Havas, J.*, Haggard, P., Gomi, H., Bestmann, S., Ikegaya, Y., & Hagura,N.* (2022). Evidence that endpoint feedback facilitates intermanual transferof visuomotor

force

learning byNeurophysiology. 127 (1), 16-26.

acognitive strategy. Journalof

https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00008.2021
21. Cataldo, A.#, Hagura, N.#, Hyder, Y., & Haggard P. * (2021). Touch inhibits
touch: sanshool-induced paradoxical tingling reveals perceptual interactionbetween somatosensory submodalities. Proceedings of the Royal Society B;

Biological Sciences. 288 (1943), 20202914.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2914 (#: 共同筆頭著者)
20. Desantis, A.*, Haggard, P., Ikegaya, Y., & Hagura, N. (2018). Specificity ofaction selection modulates the perceived temporal order of action and sensory
events. Experimental Brain Research. 236, 2157-2164.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5292-5

19. ※ Hagura, N.*, Haggard, P. & Diedrichsen, J. (2017). Perceptual decisions
are biased by the cost to act. eLife, 6, e18422.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18422＜Faculty Opinions にて、★二つの評価
https://facultyopinions.com/article/727327868 ＞
18. Kuroki, S.*, Hagura, N.*, Nishida, S., & Haggard, P., & Watanabe, J. (2016).
Sanshool on the fingertip interferes with vibration detection in a rapidlyadapting (RA) tactile channel. PloS One, 11, e0165842.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165842

17. Funayama, K., Hagura, N., Ban, H., & Ikegaya, Y.* (2016). Functional

Organization of Flash-induced V1 Offline Reactivation. The Journal ofNeuroscience, 36 (46), 11727-11738.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1575-16.2016
16. Orgs, G., Dovern, A., Hagura, N., Haggard, P., Fink, G.R. & Weiss PH.*(2015). Constructing visual perception of body movement with the motor
cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 26 (1), 440-449.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv262
15. Hagura, N.*, Haggard, P. (2015). Body Representation and Neuroprosthetics.
In: Kansaku, K., Cohen, L., Birbaumer, N. (eds) Clinical Systems
Neuroscience. Springer, Tokyo.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55037-2_10
14. Nambu, I.*, Hagura, N., Hirose, S., Wada, Y., Kawato, M., & Naito E.* (2015).
Decoding two different types of sequential finger movement from preparatory
activity of higher-order motor regions: an fMRI multi-voxel pattern analysis.

European Journal of Neuroscience, 42 (10), 2851-2859.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13063
13. Binetti, N.*, Hagura, N., Fadipe, C., Tomassini, A., Walsh, V., & Bestmann, S.

(2015). Binding space and time through action. Proceedings of the Royal

Society B; Biological Sciences, 282 (1805), 20150381.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0381

12. Honda, T., Hagura, N., Yoshioka, T., & Imamizu, H.* (2013). Imposed visualfeedback delay of an action changes mass perception based on the sensory
prediction error. Frontiers in Psychology. 4, 760.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00760

11. ※ Hagura, N.*, Barber, H., & Haggard, P.* (2013). Food vibrations: Asianspice sets lips trembling. Proceedings of the Royal Society B; BiologicalSciences. 280 (1770), 20131680.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1680
10. Verrel, J., Hagura, N., Lindenberger, U., & Haggard, P. (2013). Effect ofhaptic feedback from self-touch on limb movement coordination. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39 (6), 1775-1785.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0032735
9. Orgs, G., Hagura, N., & Haggard, P. (2013). Learning to like it: aesthetic
perception of bodies, movements and choreographic structure. Conscious andCognition. 22 (2), 603-612.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.010
8. ※ Hagura, N.*, Kanai, R., Orgs, G., & Haggard, P. (2012). Ready steady slow:

action preparation slows the subjective passage of time. Proceedings of theRoyal Society B; Biological Sciences. 279 (1746), 4399-4406.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.010

7. Hagura, N.*, Hirose, S., Matsumura, M., & Naito, E. (2012). Am I seeing myhand? Visual appearance and knowledge of controllability both contribute to

the visual capture of a person's own body. Proceedings of the Royal Society B;

Biological Sciences. 279 (1742), 3476-3481.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0750
6. Manto, M., Bower, J.M., Conforto, A.B., Delgado-García, J.M., da Guarda,

S.N., Gerwig, M., Habas, C., Hagura, N., Ivry, R.B., Mariën, P., Molinari, M.,Naito, E., Nowak, D.A., Oulad Ben Taib, N., Pelisson, D., Tesche, C.D.,
Tilikete, C., & Timmann, D. (2012). Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum
in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Cerebellum. 11, 457-487.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-011-0331-9
5. Naito, E.*, Matsumoto, R., Hagura, N., Oouchida, Y., Tomimoto, H.,
Hanakawa, T. (2011). Importance of precentral motor regions in humankinesthesia: a single case study. Neurocase. 17 (2), 133-147.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2010.498428

4. Hirose, S., Hagura, N., Matsumura, M., & Naito, E. * (2010). Human rostral
dorsal premotor cortex mediates graspability judgment of external objects byevaluating hand motor capability. Brain Research. 1313 (8),134-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.066

3. Hagura, N., Oouchida, Y., Aramaki, Y., Okada, T., Matsumura, M., Sadato, N.,Naito, E. * (2009). Visuokinesthetic perception of hand movement is mediatedby cerebro-cerebellar interaction between the left cerebellum and rightparietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19 (1), 176-186.

https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn068

2. ※ Hagura, N., Takei, T., Hirose, S., Aramaki, Y., Matsumura, M., Sadato, N.,& Naito, E.* (2007). Activity in the posterior parietal cortex mediates visual

dominance over kinesthesia. The Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (26), 7047-7053.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0970-07.2007＜Faculty Opinions にて、★二つの評価
https://facultyopinions.com/article/1087665 ＞
1. Takei, T., Hashimoto, T., Hagura, N., Matsumura, M., & Naito, E.* (2005).
Reduction of cortico-spinal excitability by transcranial magnetic stimulation at
predictable timing. Japanese Journal of Physiology. 55:93-99.

https://doi.org/10.2170/jjphysiol.R2075

b. 国際学会・海外学会での発表・講演等（口頭発表に採択され、羽倉が発表したもののみ記載）

11. Ogasa, K., Yokoi, A., Okazawa, G., Hirashima, M., Hagura, N. (2021).
Decision uncertainty as a context for motor memory. MLMC: Advances inMotor Learning & Motor control, (Online). (採択率 30％以下)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mbox0nWUD4xvNneOMzinELnC3tpuiec
C/viewhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZNATH3RtIc&t=3407s
10. Hagura, N. (2020). Perceptual Decision in Motor control. International
Symposium: The Role of Pain in Bodily Defense and Autonomy, Osaka, Japan.
https://www.med.osaka-u.ac.jp/pub/nsurg/yanagisawa/symposium/
9. Hagura, N., Aoyama, K., Ban, H., Yokoi, A., Ikegaya, Y., Maeda, T., Ando, H.,Ferre, E.R. (2019). Multi-dimensional vestibular self-motion system in thehuman brain. Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting 2018, San Diego, USA,(Nano symposium)
8. Hagura, N., (2017). Impact of different time schedules on effort adaptation.
The 2nd International Symposium on the Science of Mental Time 2017, Nara,Japan.
7. Hagura, N. (2015) Linking Perception and Action. Telluride Neuromorphic
Cognition Workshop. Telluride, USA.
6. Hagura, N., Haggard, P., Diedrichsen, J. (2014). Action cost biases theperceptual decision making, only when the cost is implicit. Associations of
Scientific Studies of Consciousness 2014, Brisbane, Australia.
5. Hagura, N. (2014). Ready-Steady-Slow; Action preparation slows down
subjective passage of time. In Symposium “Bidirectional Influence in action
and perception” at Asia-Pacific Association for Sports Psychology, Tokyo,Japan.
4. Hagura, N., Diedrichsen, J., Haggard, P. (2013). Action cost biases theperceptual decision making, only when the cost is implicit. Translational andComputational Motor Control 2013, San Diego, USA. (採択率 30％以下)
https://groups.seas.harvard.edu/motorlab/TCMC2013/91.pdf
3. Hagura, N. (2013). Action preparation and perception of time - modified
sensory information by sensorimotor processing. Sense of Agency Workshop,London, U.K.

2. Hagura, N. (2012). Integrating visual and proprioceptive information in thehuman visual cortex. Cue Integration Symposium, London, U.K.
1. Hagura, N. (2005). Integration of visual and kinesthetic information in thehuman cerebellum. Annual Meeting of Organization of Human Brain
Mapping. Toronto, Canada.
c. その他の国際的な業績 （研究所等における招待講演：Department Seminar以上の講演）
5. Hagura, N. (2023). Decision Uncertainty as a Context for Motor Memory.
Cognitive Neuroscience Club at Karolinska Institute (Online).
4. Hagura, N. (2017). Action modulating perceptual decisions. Laboratoire
Psychologie de la Perception (LPP) department seminar, Universite Paris
Descartes, Paris, France.
3. Hagura, N. (2013). Sensing time through action. Psychology department
seminar, Brunel University, London, U.K.
2. Hagura, N. (2012). Action Preparation, Preparation for Motor Output andSensory Processing, COGS seminar, Sussex University, Brighton, U.K.
1. Hagura, N. (2012) Action preparation; preparation for motor output andpreparation for sensory processing Sensorimotor Seminar Series, Birmingham
University, Birmingham, U.K.