Global Thematic Consultation on Governance and the Post-2015
Development Framework

Just Governancefor the World We NeedA critical cornerstone for an equitable andhuman rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-2015

February, 2013

Executive Summary
Weak and illegitimate governance—both within and between countries—
explains to a significant degree why the benefits of development are not equallyshared nor sustainable over time, despite the existence of abundant material andhuman resources sufficient to enable people and future generations everywhereto live lives of dignity, free of disparity and deprivation. Governance breakdowns
are even more acute in this new century. We live in an evermore interdependent,
multi-polar and volatile world, with a proliferation of new development actors, a
deepening sense of fragmentation in responsibilities, and still fewer trusted
forums to ensure coherence around common social, economic andenvironmental values and goals.
As debate intensifies on the future of the post-2015 sustainable development
agenda, participating organizations in Beyond-2015 came together to develop
this joint position paper on governance, which advances the concept of justgovernance—a necessary precondition and prerequisite for an effective andlegitimate sustainable development framework. Just governance is defined by six
key, mutually-reinforcing dimensions, each with their associated implications forthe post-2015 sustainable development framework. To be truly just, governanceat all levels must be: 1) human rights-centred, 2) participatory, 3) transparent, 4)
equitable, 5) guaranteeing of access to justice, rule of law and the fight against
corruption, and finally 6) accountable. Just governance in this sense is not amatter of external imposition, but an indispensable precondition for ensuringthat the equal rights of all people and the sustainability of the planet effectively
guide all policy-making.
In a complex and multidimensional world, human rights help to delineate therespective obligations and responsibilities of governments and other relevant
development actors, impelling decision-makers to be more responsive, providing
information about their decisions and actions, and making them ultimately
answerable to those to whom they are accountable. Governance in practice isoften coloured by unequal relations of power, between the state andimpoverished/discriminated groups, between the government and the private
sector, and between small states and more influential ones. In this web of power
relationships, abiding by international standards, particularly human rights andenvironmental standards, can help balance inequities, and provide a common
language and standard by which to hold all actors accountable. In contrast to thehistoric asymmetries in responsibility for development embedded in the MDGs,
which placed heavy burdens on poorer countries, the post-2015 framework
must recognize the common but differentiated responsibilities for progress
shared by all. Likewise, the new framework must be universally applicable inrich and poor countries alike, while also being tailored and adaptable to different
national and sub-national circumstances, and remaining at the service of andowned by poor people themselves.
Recognizing that the respect, protection and fulfilment of all human rights—
economic, social, cultural, environmental, civil and political—is both the purpose
and the ultimate litmus test of success for the post-2015 sustainable
Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-20152

development agenda, just governance in the post-2015 era would first require areconception of sustainable development goals not as needs and services but asrights accessible to all. These rights would involve common and differentiatedduties clearly attributed to development actors—primarily governments but also
including the private sector. Just governance post-2015 also implies that the newframework enables those most affected by poverty and inequality to shape thedesign, implementation and monitoring of sustainable development processes,
outcomes, and the achievement of goals at all levels.
The right to information is likewise an essential prerequisite for a robust,
informed public debate through which decision-makers become answerable totheir people, and rights-holders are enabled to monitor and assess public andprivate sector conduct. The new development framework should stimulate open
government reforms to laws and policies to ensure wide access to information
relevant to peoples’ lives, including information necessary for people tomeaningfully participate in all stages of the legal reform, budget, fiscal, tax anddevelopment policy cycles. All development actors, especially the private sector,
should equally commit to full transparency in their operations and accounting,especially regarding the payment of taxes and royalties, and the use andexploitation of natural resources. The ability to consistently monitor and review
conduct of development actors against established responsibilities is an essential
prerequisite for just and accountable governance. It is crucial then to haveextensive and publically available measurements on the performance ofgovernmental institutions, both of outcomes and of policy processes, evaluating
their effectiveness in delivering results and the legitimacy of the processes
through which these results are delivered. The post-2015 framework has thepotential to stimulate more comprehensive and rigorous monitoring efforts, andmotivate more disaggregated data collection to measure the differentiatedprogress and backsliding among various populations, especially those most
excluded from the benefits of development.
Just governance likewise implies that the successor framework include an
explicit focus on equality and equity across all development goals, geared
towards ensuring that those who are most marginalized participate in thebenefits of development. Building on decades of international commitments onfinancing development, the new framework should also include concretecommitments, especially from high-income countries, to allocate sufficientmaterial and institutional resources and contribute to capacity building. Given
the inherent link between accountability, representation and taxation, tax justicebetween and within countries should be monitored and strongly incentivizedthrough any successor framework.
Finally, just governance implies accountable governance over all relevant actors
at all levels, based on a clear accord regarding who is responsible for what post2015 commitments. For accountable governance to be universally applicable aswell as meaningful and effective over time, interactive systems of accountability
need to be put into place as part and parcel of the post-2015 sustainable
development framework.
Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-20153

Introduction: Just Governance for the World We Need
“We will spare no effort to free our fellow men, women and children from the abject anddehumanizing conditions of extreme poverty, to which more than a billion of them are currently
subjected…Success in meeting these objectives depends, inter alia, on good governance within eachcountry. It also depends on good governance at the international level and on transparency in thefinancial, monetary and trading systems.” -United Nations Millennium Declaration, 2000
“Implementation of a post-2015 development agenda will depend, critically, on effective governancecapacities at national, local and municipal levels, including political commitment and leadership;
and on the legal and economic empowerment of people, especially those most excluded, and of theircivil society organizations, to participate effectively in national and local decision-making.” – UN
System Task Team on the post-2015 UN Development Agenda1

There is a wide consensus that good governance at all levels—from local
communities to national assemblies to relevant intergovernmental bodies to thevery halls of the UN and the IMF—is a necessary cornerstone for achieving
equitable, sustainable and human rights-centered development. Conversely,
there is wide agreement that weak and illegitimate governance—both within
and between countries—explains to a significant degree why the benefits ofdevelopment are not equally shared nor sustainable over time, despite theexistence of abundant material and human resources to enable current andfuture generations everywhere to live lives of dignity, free of disparity anddeprivation. This is even more acutely the case in our new century. We live in anever more interdependent, multi-polar and volatile world, with a proliferation of
new development actors, a deepening sense of fragmentation in responsibilities,
and still fewer trusted forums to ensure coherence around common social,economic and environmental values and goals.
Widespread recognition and empirical evidence2 has shown that governance—
both at the sub-national, national and global levels—remains one of the foremost
missing links in the achievement and sustainability of the MDGs.3 Many of the
MDGs’ unfulfilled promises can be attributed to fragmented, incoherent andunjust forms of governance. Lack of people’s voices in policy design,
implementation and monitoring along the whole line of accountability from theglobal to the national to the local levels, coupled with poor coordination acrosssectors, within and between governments, has constrained progress. National
efforts to attain the MDGs, for example, are often housed in the foreign affairs
department, far removed from legislative bodies or more directly accountable
representative structures of government. At the global level, policy andresourcing decisions by some development actors—individually and in concert
through international institutions—severely constrain governments fromenacting effective and participatory sustainable development policies in the1

UN System Task Team on the post-2015 UN Development Agenda (2012). Realizing the Future We Want for All
Report to the Secretary General. Online at:
http://www.beyond2015.org/sites/default/files/Realizing%20the%20future%20we%20want.pdf.
2
See: Transparency International (2010). The Anti-Corruption Catalyst: Realising the MDGs by 2015. Online at:
http://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/pub/the_anti_corruption_catalyst_realising_the_mdgs_by_2015.
3
At the MDG Summit in 2010, world leaders acknowledged that good governance at the national and international
level is essential for sustained, inclusive and equitable growth and the eradication of poverty and hunger. See also
for example UNDP. (2010). The Path to Achieving the MDGs: a synthesis of evidence from around the world.
UNDP: New York; UNDP. (2010). Beyond the Mid-point: achieving the MDGs. UNDP: New York.

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-20154

interests of all. At the same time, democratisation and good governance can too
often function as a façade—more form and procedure than substance and fact—
entrenching the privileges of a narrow elite, which bases its power on patronage,
clientelism and corporate interests rather than broad, popular support. Even
formal democracies often suffer from deep governance deficits, both
domestically within institutions and across sectors, and globally through somecountries’ undue influence over others. This risks delivering more to those who
already have, thus further widening gaps in income, dignity and status,
deepening fragmentation and undermining equitable, sustainable and humanrights-centered development. These national and global governancebreakdowns partly explain the mixed performance on MDGs between groups
and among regions in some of the countries that have reached the development
targets nationally.4
To address the widespread governance gaps, then, and to ensure that the post2015 sustainable development agenda is effective and legitimate, it is essentialthat the new framework (and each of its goals) be grounded on the firm
foundation of just governance. Just governance is not only about ensuring everysocial group gets a slice of the proceeds of a prosperous world. Just governanceis about ensuring that those vested with authority are not allowed to become
corrupted by their power. Just governance holds decision-makers accountable
for actions or omissions that fail to meet human rights obligations or legal
requirements aimed at enabling sustainable development and ensuring humanrights. Just governance, therefore, can help foster public trust in institutions, theintegrity of public officials and more accountable decision-making. As such, justgovernance provides a platform to forge shared solutions to long-standing
national and global-level collective action problems.5 Just governance is thus a
cornerstone to enabling coherence, securing commitment to action by all
development actors, held in place by various interactive, transparent and multidimensional systems of accountability. Just governance does not impose external
conditionalities, but instead provides the indispensable preconditions by which
the rights of people and the planet are freed to lead in the shaping of tomorrow.

6 Essential Dimensions of Just Governance“Just governance connotes the need for justice for all sections of society and theequal preservation of socio-economic rights of all people, which would also be intandem with the protection of the planet's natural resources.”6
The world we need is one standing on the cornerstone of just governance, a
4

See UN (2012). Millennium Development Goals Report 2012. UN: New York. Online at:
http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/mdg-report-2012.html.
5
D Booth, (2012) ‘Development as a collective action problem’, Africa, Power and Politics, See:
http://www.institutions-africa.org/filestream/20121024-appp-synthesis-report-development-as-a-collective-actionproblem.
6
Wada Na Todo (2012), Shaping Our Shared Future beyond 2015 – Perspectives from the Global South. WadaNa Todo Abhiyan: New Delhi. Online at:
http://www.wadanatodo.net/download/Reports/Post2015/ShapingOurSharedFutureBeyond2015Perspectivesfromth
eGlobalSouth.pdf.

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-2015
5

necessary precondition and prerequisite for an effective and legitimate
sustainable development framework. While allowing for different, precise
meanings for different actors in different contexts and at different levels, justgovernance can be seen as composed of six key, mutually-reinforcing
dimensions, each with their associated implications for the post-2015
sustainable development framework.

1. Human rights at the centre“It's unbelievable that the government can talk about its concern with poverty, but
it pays bankers billions of dollars. It's robbing from the poor to feed the rich. It ismorally corrupt - doing precisely the opposite of what a government should do.”~ Grassroots consultation, USA
To be truly just, governance should first be grounded in the universal humanrights framework, recognizing that the respect, protection and fulfilment of all
human rights—economic, social, cultural, civil and political—is both the purpose
and the ultimate litmus test of success for the post-2015 sustainable
development agenda. In addition to being the ultimate aim of sustainable
development, human rights norms offer measurable standards of conduct andoperational principles. In a complex and multi-dimensional world, human rights
help to delineate the respective obligations and responsibilities of governments
and other duty-bearers. In this sense, human rights provide a valuable road-map
to guide just governance processes. The UN Guiding Principles on Extreme
Poverty and Human Rights—recently adopted by the Human Rights Council—
provide a particularly practical tool for ways by which state — as well as nonstate — actors can integrate human rights into their efforts to combat extreme
poverty.7 Conceived as rights and duties, rather than needs and services, the newsustainable development goals will better engage affected communities,
attribute clear duties to responsible actors, and serve to further the pre-existingnorms, standard and principles of human rights at the core of the United Nations
system. Basing governance on human rights norms, standards and principles
post-2015 involves:a) Ensuring that human rights and other relevant high-order standards
underpin whatever post-2015 goals emerge. The formulation of goals,
targets and indicators must be in keeping with the content of theparticular right, including universal access (and affordability where
relevant) for all to at least minimum essential levels of rights enjoyment;
the elimination of discrimination as a barrier to the equal enjoyment ofrights and affirmative policies to redress inequalities and inequities; theright to access to information and widespread and inclusive, civic
participation in development; a focus not only on quantity but quality ofservices; and the right to effective remedy.
b) Guaranteeing the interdependence of all human rights by prompting
7

United Nations General Assembly resolution 15/19 of 18 July 2012. Final Draft of the guiding principles on
extreme poverty and human rights, submitted by the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights,
Magdalena Sepulveda Carmona, UN Document A/HRC/21/39.

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-20156

governments to respect and protect civil and political rights, such as theright to association and assembly, life and personal security as equal
cornerstones of just governance, while also respecting, protecting andfulfilling economic, social and cultural rights.

2. Participation“We hope for action on so many levels - but sometimes we feel it is futile, because
we don't have a voice. We are from nowhere. Nobody is responsible for our
problems. When we face insecurity, bombings, check points, hunger, so many
challenges, and we want to speak out against them, we are excluded from so many
spaces.”~ Poverty hearings, Palestine
Just governance enables people to exercise their right to participate incontinuous, systematic and consequential ways in all public decision-making
processes that affect their lives, at all stages of the policy cycle from design toimplementation, to resourcing to monitoring. Indeed, the ultimate legitimacy of
government is derived over time through its interaction with educated and wellinformed citizens, and an organised and active civil society. The post-2015
agenda can serve as an instrument to empower broad-based participative
governance in development by:a) Enabling those most affected by poverty and discrimination (and theirfreely-chosen representatives) to shape the design, implementation andmonitoring of development process and outcomes. Rather than tokenistic,
pro forma consultations which tend to disempower people, theperspectives of people living in poverty in particular should enrichdevelopment processes and fundamentally influence decisions made.
Furthermore, the free, prior and informed consent of rights-holders must
be respected in any decisions that are taken in the name of political,
economic and /or social development. The post-2015 development
agenda should provide spaces for affected people to enjoy the right toparticipate in global institutions, both through their elected government
representatives and directly through their own associations. International
decisions on how to course-correct and adaptively allocate resourcesmust be made through a transparent, democratic and genuinely
participatory process, representing both states and populations, andmeaningfully consulting with those whose interests are most affected.
b) Sustaining and reinforcing with policy, structural and institutional
support the capacity of an active, organized civil society to transform
global commitments into lived realities—free of the fear of intimidation,
stigmatization or retribution8—is essential if the post-2015 agenda is tobe legitimate, lasting and effectively implemented. There should be acommitment to monitor the enabling environment for citizen and civil
8

ACT Alliance (2011). Shrinking Political Space of Civil Society Action.

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-20157society participation. Reporting on this enabling environment should
form part of all future national reports under the new framework. In
particular, reports should assess: a) the degree to which legislation,
including NGO legislation, respects the right to association and assembly;b) the degree to which state practice is consonant with the right toassociation and assembly; c) the degree to which there is an
institutionalised and systematic process for seeking input from civilsociety organisations and citizens in the formulation and monitoring ofdevelopment projects, policies, programmes and budgetary allocations; d)the extent to which legislation grants CSOs standing to exercise the rightof access to justice in defence of public goods, including the environment.
c) Particular emphasis should be given to ensuring that those most excluded
and discriminated against are empowered with sufficient resources,
training and opportunities to effectively participate in shaping andmonitoring the policies that affect them, at the national, regional andinternational levels.
d) As a prerequisite for the effective exercise of public participation inpolicy- and decision-making, freedom of information legislation should be
adopted and enforced. This includes access to the information exchanged
between governments and managed by intergovernmental bodies,
especially in the cases of cross-border tax evasion, illicit financial flows,
and trans-boundary natural resources and ecosystems. The future agenda
should for example aim to encourage involvement and strengthen the roleof civil society and citizens in decisions on the management of natural
resources, as recognized in Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration, throughinformation and transparency, including early publication of draft
documents, opportunities to engage and meaningful consultations.

3. Transparency and the right to information“For a long time, we felt we had a good relationship with our local councillor. They
would call meetings, and inform us of what was happening. This was good, except
eventually, we realized we were being taken for a ride. If we wanted real
information, about where the council budget was being spent, we were met withempty hands. There is only so far you can go when the information isn't there.
Government is giving pennies with one hand, and hiding the dollars they take withthe other.”~ Poverty hearings, Mali
Decisions and their enforcement should be taken in a transparent manner, incompliance with established procedures and requirements, and through which
information is freely available and directly accessible to those affected bypoverty and inequality.9 While openness itself does not necessarily lead to
9

See United Nations Conference on Environment and Development of June 14, 1992 Rio Declaration on
Environment and Development, Principle 10. UN Document A/CONF.151/26. For a regional example, see the
Aarhus Convention.

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-20158

rights-realizing results, it is an essential prerequisite for a robust, informed
public debate through which decision-makers become answerable to theirpeople, and rights-holders are enabled to monitor and assess public and private
sector conduct in light of the applicable juridical framework supporting humanrights and sustainable development. Post-2015, transparent governance implies
that:a) International, national and sub-national commitments should be
publicised widely and in a timely manner using all available
communication channels, including at the community level. In addition,
information must be presented in a meaningful, understandable andcomprehensive format so that people feel empowered to make informed
decisions in order to hold their leaders to account.
b) The new development framework should stimulate open government
reforms to laws and policies to ensure wide access to information
relevant to peoples’ lives, including information necessary for people tomeaningfully participate in all stages of the legal reform, budget, fiscal, tax
and development policy cycles—from agenda-setting in national
strategies to policy design in action plans, and in their implementation,
their resourcing and their monitoring over time. All development actors,
especially the private sector, should equally commit to full transparency
in their operations and accounting, especially regarding the payment oftaxes and royalties, and the use and exploitation of natural resources.
c) Concrete progress must be transparently tracked on fiscal transparency,
including open budgets and the publication of key financial data on
government revenues on aid, tax and investment as well as expenditures.
d) Information should be available to the public in such a timely,
comprehensive and understandable way that it can be used to hold duty
bearers accountable. This includes the quality and relevance of national
statistics, and the ability to disaggregate national data to a local level.
e) Any future global development partnership should explicitly monitor
financial secrecy—a global obstacle to resource mobilization—and holdrelevant governments, businesses and other private actors accountable totheir corresponding right to information responsibilities. These
responsibilities include supporting in real and cooperative terms
efforts—for example through the automatic exchange of tax information10
and country-by-country reporting11—to expose those who attempt toconceal their gains and shield themselves from their tax responsibilities
to society.

10Markus Meinzer (2013). Towards multilateral automatic information exchange. Tax Justice Network. Online at:
http://www.taxjustice.net/cms/upload/pdf/AIE2012-TJN-Briefing.pdf.
11Richard Murphy FCA (2012). Country-by-Country Reporting Accounting for globalization locally. Tax Justice
Network. Online at: http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Documents/CBC2012.pdf.

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-20159

4. Equity and non-discrimination12“The government occasionally distributes food from the Nepal Food Corporation
district chapter and Dalits are given the food at the end of distribution even though
we are in front in queue. They believe that Dalits will make the food impure! By thetime when we reach the door of store, the foods are finished. Such discrimination
should be ended immediately.”- Women and climate justice hearings, Nepal
All people and groups everywhere have equal rights in dignity. Just governancemeans ensuring that human rights are guaranteed to all members of society, inall countries. Special steps must be taken to ensure that marginalized andvulnerable populations enjoy their civil, political, economic social and culturalrights equally, including with respect to real or perceived development tradeoffs
across various sectors, such as food, energy and water security, climate change,
and the environment. Equitable and non-discriminatory governance post-2015
requires:a) The new framework—including inequality targets—must apply
universally in rich and poor countries alike, tailored and adaptable todifferent national and sub-national circumstances, but in service to andowned by poor people anywhere and everywhere. Evidence
demonstrates that, even in the most established democracies, inequality
is on the rise. Sustainable development goals should apply and be of use
to all people living in poverty, regardless of their place of birth orresidence.
b) The successor framework should include an explicit focus on equality andequity across all development goals, geared towards ensuring that those
who are most marginalized participate in the benefits of development.
Measurement of progress on all goals should be disaggregated at thenational and sub-national levels. In particular, targets should be set andprogress measured for the most excluded populations across all goals.
c) Decreasing inequality must be promoted as an explicit focus of economic
policies and strategies. To address the extremes of poverty and combat
rising inequalities within and between countries, the successor
framework should encourage systems of progressive taxation (tax equity)and equitable redistribution; commit to a focus on decent work, youth
employment, skills and job matching; implement universal and intersectoral social protection floor systems; and call on countries to secure
equitable and sustainable access to natural resources, such as water andland rights.

12

For more details, see Beyond 2015’s position paper on inequality, (2012). A Holistic And Human Rights-BasedApproach For Addressing Inequalities In The Post-2015 Development Agenda. Online at:https://docs.google.com/open?id=1jgzqUMl8Z9Wh4eAmWk1OdVa861tUFX9eQaDASmw9S4gq8MI0um4Dmzb
4zbX1.

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-201510

5. Access to justice, rule of law and anti-corruption“Indigenous people here are facing so many problems. Even getting documentation
is a challenge. Without papers, it is easy to find excuses to deny us services, and to
marginalize us even further. It is we women who see the worst of it. Men can beatus, and without an ID document, we can't turn anywhere for justice. We want tospeak out, but our voices are met with brick walls.”- Women and climate justice tribunals, Peru
“We don’t know anything and are not told anything. If there are laws, we should
understand them as citizens. They have an obligation to explain the laws.”– Nicaragua focus group participant‘The corruption in our country is so discouraging. We know from the newspapers
that money is coming into our country. Help is being sent from all corners so that
Tanzania can develop. When you go to the capital, you see big cars on the streets.
But in rural areas? Nothing. That money is not reaching us. Our children are dying,
while others have more than they can eat.”- Civil society consultations, Tanzania“It is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, torebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protectedby the rule of law.”- Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Just governance requires legal frameworks that are enforced impartially, provide
the full protection of human rights, freedom from corruption, guarantee
universal access to justice, especially by the poor, and foster sustainable
development, including through the protection of ecosystems, and the vital
services they provide for people, especially the poor.13 Rule of law is integral tobuilding the integrity of sectors and institutions and serving as a defence against
corruption, mismanagement and illegitimate governance. Respect for the rule oflaw is equally essential to stem other ills that are fuelled by the lack of integrityand enforcement, including insecurity, criminal networks, illicit financial flows
and an overarching atmosphere and culture of impunity. Proper checks andbalances help catalyse the enforcement of laws and human rights obligations byplacing the onus on officials to demonstrate delivery on past and futuresustainable development and human rights commitments. In India, for example,
350,000 additional girls are now going to school as a result of the midday school
meal scheme required by the Indian Supreme Court’s decision on a string of rightto food legal cases. 14
Yet, marginalized women and men often find it difficult to benefit from legal
13

See Rio Principle 10, which states that “effective access to judicial and administrative proceedings, including
redress and remedy, shall be provided.” See more recently UN Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human
Rights (2012). Access to justice by people living in poverty. Online at:
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Poverty/Pages/Accesstojustice.aspx.
14
See Varun Gauri & Daniel Brinks, A New Policy Landscape: Legalizing Social and Economic Rights in theDeveloping World, in Varun Guari & Daniel Brinks eds, Courting Social Justice (Cambridge University Press,
2008), p.328.

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-201511

enforcement systems that function this way in practice. They may see theiraccess to local courts blocked by bribery and clientelism. They may find that
their rights are often disregarded in laws, policy decisions, court verdicts,
contracts and the resolution of conflicts. In many cases, international binding
agreements go unimplemented. The widespread ratification of anti-corruption
and anti-bribery conventions, for example, has not been converted into
widespread country implementation and the establishment of agreed laws andprotections. Human rights obligations—especially of a social and economic
dimension—have likewise suffered from lack of domestic incorporation andenforcement nationally. Even where laws have been made human rightscompliant, implementation and practice lag behind. It is for these reasons thatthe rule of law, access to justice and anti-corruption calls out to be reflected in
the core of any MDG successor framework. The post-2015 sustainable
development framework should urge governments to:a) Uphold the rule of law, building on the UNGA Resolution A/RES/67/1,‘Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on theRule of Law at the National and International Levels,’ and ensure thatnational, regional, local legislation and any traditional justice systems arein line with international human rights law, anti-corruption obligations,international environmental treaties and other sustainable developmentrelated international agreements. While property rights are importantvehicles for development, the rule of law should protect human rights andmandate respect for the Earth’s natural boundaries above all. All laws andpolicies should be subjected to the requisites of human rights andsustainable development, not merely at the discretion of the publically or
privately powerful. Governments, meanwhile, must protect theindependence of the judiciary, such as when it comes to the hiring andpromotion of judges and ensuring court rulings are laid down andexecuted free from political interference.
b) Enhance equal access to justice by people living in poverty, and eliminate
any existing barriers which prevent these individuals from accessing andbenefitting from human rights-compliant legal systems and practices. As
confirmed by the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Extreme
Poverty, access to justice is a human right in and of itself, and alsoessential for uprooting the chronic causes of poverty.
c) Prompt governments to ratify, review and enforce anti-corruption
conventions, including the UN Convention against Corruption, and theOECD Anti-Bribery Convention. In taking this step, important ground canbe gained for access to justice and rule of law, helping to promote higher
integrity standards for areas such as procurement and public financial
management.
d) Compel governments to enforce financial sector integrity measures,
including anti-money laundering and asset recovery. This step is essential
to stem illicit financial flows, corruption, tax evasion and criminal
networks. Fostering improved financial sector governance and integrity
Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-201512

can help to promote citizen security as well prevent the loss of needed
domestic resources for funding schools, clinics and other development
sectors.
e) Properly resource regulatory and administrative systems, mechanisms
and bodies—especially environmental and tax authorities as well as
financial sector regulating bodies15—to work efficiently and effectively in
the interest of enabling sustainable development and resourcing humanrights over time.

6. Accountability“From colonial times, the history of our village is one of broken promises. Projects
come, they go, politicians come for elections, they go. Everyone promises something,and nothing is delivered. Sometimes, the young people get upset when promises arebroken. But we don’t even blink. Because we know, when promises are broken,
there is nobody we can go to. We must take responsibility for ourselves, because
nobody else will come back to us.”
- Grassroots ambassador, Mali
“Often, you find in government that the left hand doesn’t know what the right handis doing. Someone is off in New York making promises that never make it backacross the ocean.”~ Poverty hearings, South Africa“If these people (chiefs, police, officials) knew there would be consequences, thiswould enhance their accountability.”
Women’s focus group participant, Malawi“If you come and ask me what I need, and then you bring me something else, I willtake it. But you have not helped me.”- Poverty hearings, Mali
“We can talk to the duty bearers or give them in writing about a particulardemand/complaint. But, we have no idea what to do if the duty bearers do notrespond to their complaints.”-Focus group participant, India
Perhaps the most central pillar to just governance is ensuring accountability isachieved through checks and balances that hold decision-makers to account for
both their actions and their failures to act. Sustainable development and humanrights accountability can be said to have three main constituent characteristics.16
15 For more on the linkages between financial regulation and human rights, visit: www.rightingfinance.org.
16

See OHCHR/CESR (forthcoming, 2013). Who Will be Accountable? Human Rights and the Post-2015
Development Agenda. See also Schedler, Andreas. 1999. Conceptualizing Accountability. In The Self-Restraining
State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, eds. A. Schedler, L. J. Diamond and M. F. Plattner, 13-28.
Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers; Diamond, Larry J., and Leonardo Morlino (2005). Introduction. In Assessing
the Quality of Democracy, eds. L. Diamond, and L. Morlino, IX- XLIII. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
See Peter Newell and Shaula Bellour (2002). Mapping accountability. Institute of Development Studies: Brighton;
John M. Ackermann (2005), Social accountability in the Public Sector A Conceptual Discussion. The World Bank:

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-2015
13

First, the full array of development actors—primarily governments but also theprivate sector, inter-governmental and regional bodies, and civil society amongst
others—must have clearly-defined responsibilities, duties and performancestandards against which their actions can be judged. Much of these relevant
standards are helpfully already provided in domestic and international norms
that have evolved over the past 50 years. Second, development actors, to beaccountable in any meaningful sense, must be responsive, providing information
about their decisions and actions, and being ultimately answerable to those towhom they are accountable. Thirdly, marginalized and vulnerable groups must
be in a position to exercise and enforce their rights, seeking and receiving
effective remedy through impartial, transparent, and prompt processes,
including but not limited to independent judiciaries, with the power to sanction
development actors for wrongs committed. Enforcement is critical to setting out
clear incentives for those exercising authority to respond over time to requests
and grievances from those affected by their actions in a fair, open, timely andefficient manner. Without clear, universal responsibilities (laid out in humanrights, environmental and other international treaties such as on corruption),development actors cannot be judged fairly and objectively for their conduct. At
the same time, the existence of clear responsibilities without the backstop of
enforcement to ensure they are followed simply paves the way for moreunfulfilled promises.
Accountability involves various and multiple dimensions. Governments—within
their duties to respect, protect and fulfil human rights—must be accountablehorizontally, both to other government institutions in charge of oversight(parliaments, audit institutions and courts), as well as to other states (including
through bilateral, regional and multilateral measures and government-donor
relationships). Accountability must also exist vertically, to the people whose lives
development actors impact (where governments are concerned, this must be
both downward to the people, and upward to the global arena). Finally, diagonal
accountability involves ensuring that government conduct is responsible,
answerable and enforced with regard to how it affects people in other countries.
That is, government actions which affect, constrain or limit the realization ofhuman rights of people beyond their own borders, for example throughenvironmental, tax, financial , monetary, trade, or debt policies, must be
responsive, answerable and ultimately accountable. In regions like West Africa,
where governments have, as members of the Economic Community of West
African States, acceded to governance norms and frameworks that cut acrosscountry borders and boundaries, their citizenry must be able to hold themaccountable to the governance principles within those protocols.
Who will be accountable?
The MDGs do not include any reference to how they are supposed to be achieved,
nor who is (individually or collectively) accountable for achieving them. This
resulted in a serious accountability gap in the MDG framework. Despite the factthat we know that the child mortality goal will be missed by far, for example,
Washington, D.C.; Anne Marie Goetz and Peter Jenkins (2005). Reinventing Accountability: Making Democracy
Work for Human Development. Palgrave Macmillan; OECD (2012). Draft orientations and principles.

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-201514

there will be little attempt to identify who should be held accountable formissing it. Conversely, relative success stories, such as the income poverty
reduction goal, can be claimed as achievements of the international donor
community despite the fact that they are explained to a great extent by domestic
processes predating the MDGs in a few highly populated countries as well as
aggregate level data that misses the stark differences within countries, such as
between rural/urban areas and between specific population groups. This starkmismatch between aspirational commitments and ultimate responsibilities
prevents an accurate explanation of what’s working and what’s not, and thwarts
policy learning.
Governance in practice is often coloured by unequal relations of power, between
the state and impoverished/discriminated groups, between the government andthe private sector, between small states and much more influential ones. In thisweb of power relationships, abiding by international standards, particularly
human rights and environmental standards, can help balance inequities, andprovide a common language and standard by which to hold all actors
accountable. To be meaningful, just governance must include and apply to all.
Just as all people have human rights, all development actors—first and foremost
governments but also the private sector, civil society, and international
institutions—have responsibilities. In contrast to the historic asymmetries in
responsibility for development embedded in the MDGs, which placed heavy
burdens on poor countries, the post-2015 framework must recognize thecommon but differentiated responsibilities for progress, shared by all anduniversally applicable, in tune with the Rio Principles.
A key step towards enabling true accountability in the new framework then is toclearly specify the responsibilities of all actors in development for achieving thegoals. Based on pre-existing human rights and environmental law, theframework should reconfirm consensus on who is responsible for what toachieve the goals. This time, goals and commitments must merge, with clear
information on who is accountable for achieving targets, as well as how they aremeant to be achieved. Post-2015 goals should drive particular commitments by
all actors involved in development to take particular means to achieve them andto take corrective action through a transparent and participatory decision
making process in the case they are not on track to be achieved. All actors should
outline how they will fulfil the goals, allowing communities to monitor and trackprogress and advocate for changes at the local, national and global level.
How to ensure accountability in the post-2015 framework?
Delineating common and differentiated responsibilities in the new framework
will be complex, but imminently possible. This process should involve thefollowing principles:

Do no harm: The new framework should generate agreement that, at thevery least, development actors must respect rights by doing no harm topeople and the planet. The precautionary principle, inherited from the Rio

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-201515

Declaration,17 insists that any conduct that has a suspected risk of causing
irreversible harm to people or the planet should be subjected to an
impact assessment, with the burden of proof lying with the proponent. In
absence of such proof, the action or policy should be immediately
postponed, if not eliminated outright. The post-2015 agenda—based on
established human rights duties—should compel governments to assess
the environmental and human rights impact of their conduct, both
domestically and beyond their borders. 18 The framework should include
goals and targets aimed at reforming those institutionalized rules andpractices that introduce financial or environmental instability, impede
development and sustainability or exacerbate poverty and humandeprivation. Among the areas in which such reforms could have a major
impact on human development, poverty alleviation, and sustainability
are: illicit financial flows and transparency, intellectual property rights,
resource and borrowing privileges, illegitimate debt, trade agreements,
tax competition, financial regulation, labour standards, environmental
sustainability and perverse subsidies, climate change, immigration policy
and the arms trade. Governments meanwhile should establish complaint
mechanisms accessible to individuals or groups in other countries thathave cause to believe their human rights or the environment have been
infringed through decisions in bilateral, regional or multilateral bodies.


National democratic ownership of development: As a central means offostering national ownership, new global goals must be aligned withnational policies, budgets, and local delivery. Without such verticalalignment, it is likely that any new set of goals will remain aspirational
and unachieved. For each country, democratic ownership of a new global
framework should be facilitated through the formulation of compliant
targets and indicators at the national level. These national level processes
should be carried out with effective and meaningful participation ofnational parliaments, citizens, civil society organizations and other key
stakeholders. Transparency and accountability assessments should beparticipatory and go beyond issues of capacity to assess the political
dynamics of governance in a particular country. Creating more effective
and coherent global governance will be a futile exercise if it is notreflected in, and ‘owned' by, effective national counterparts and placed in
an influential governance position vis-à-vis other ministries and interest
groups.



Accountable financing and resources: The new framework should
include concrete commitments, especially from high-income countries, toallocate sufficient material and institutional resources and contribute tocapacity building for making progress and achieving development goals.
Resources should be allocated through at least two main sources: aid andthe diversion of funds from harmful practices. Given the inherent link
between accountability, representation and taxation, tax justice between

17

Rio Declaration, Principle 15.
Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the area of Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights (2011).
18

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-201516and within countries should be monitored and incentivized through thesuccessor framework.19
Effectiveness and efficiency: Just governance entails capabledevelopment actors—from governments to the private sector to civilsociety—to effectively and efficiently deliver valuable and sustainablegains that achieve sustainable development objectives. Weak institutional
capacity to implement results in expenditures that aren’t effectively
targeted towards the priority development issues, and a lack of political
will and institutional priority to strengthen governance all serve as
obstacles to just governance. The civil society sector faces particularobstacles, from weakened institutional support to intimidation,
retribution, criminalization and, in some cases, assassination.
Actual capacity of individual states, including available resources, to fulfil
their commitments will vary. Therefore, targets should be specific to thecontext, whilst demonstrating progress towards the overarching goals.
Conduct by some stakeholders—states, private actors, international
institutions—which places undue constraints on governments’ capacities
to reach their sustainable development goals should be monitored andrectified. Further, some states may require increased investment in public
institutions, including tax, fiscal and regulatory authorities, so that they
are better equipped to deliver on targets set in transparent andparticipatory ways.



Monitoring and measuring progress and backsliding: The ability toconsistently monitor and review conduct of development actors against
established responsibilities is an essential prerequisite for just andaccountable governance. It is crucial to have extensive and publicallyavailable measurements on the performance of governmental institutions,both of outcomes and of policy processes, evaluating their effectiveness indelivering results and the legitimacy of the processes through which theseresults are delivered. The post-2015 framework has the potential tostimulate more comprehensive and rigorous monitoring efforts, andmotivate more disaggregated data collection to measure thedifferentiated progress and backsliding among various populations,especially those most excluded from the benefits of development.20
Where there are currently gaps in data, resources should be invested indeveloping rigorous, comprehensive and comparable measurements ofdisparity, deprivation and environmental degradation. In particular, there
should be measurable targets on the transparency, accountability andintegrity of all development actors. In addition, measurable targets on the
degree of civic participation, in particular of those most excluded, in all

19

See for example Broms, R (2011). Taxation and government quality: The size, the shape, or just Europe 300
years ago?, Quality of Government Institute (University of Gothenburg) Working Paper 2011/16. Online at:
http://www.qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1357/1357842_2011_16_broms.pdf; and di John, J (2010).Taxation,
resource mobilisation and state performance. DFID/LSE Crisis States Research Centre Working Paper 84. Online
at: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/11785/1/WP84.2.pdf.
20
Kabeer, N. (2010). Can the MDGs provide a pathway to social justice? The challenge of intersecting
inequalities. IDS/UN MDG Achievement Fund. UNDP: New York.

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-201517

decisions affecting their lives, and the ecosystem services on which they
depend, should be developed and monitored. Government policy efforts,
including the generation and use of available resources, should also bemonitored, and should address the quality of services and the underlying
factors inhibiting access to them. Finally, the framework should allow
space at the country level to define context-specific groups that may needparticular attention.
Accountability and global governance
Just governance will only be feasible if the post-2015 development agenda
includes a framework for profound reforms of global governance, the failings ofwhich pose severe constraints on realizing human rights and sustainable
development at the regional and national levels. Global cooperation onsustainable development should address the strengthening of multilateral andmutually accountable agreements on development, human rights and theenvironment. Accountable global governance requires policy coherence, judged
against the high standards of human rights and sustainable development, inparticular in those areas where collective action problems and solutions require
strong international cooperation and coordination (e.g. global financialtransparency and integrity, revenue mobilization and international tax
cooperation, trade regulation, debt, pollution, migration, climate change, sharednatural resources, wildlife trade, etc.).
Effective, accountable and participatory dimensions of governance are asimportant at the global level as they are domestically, forming a central building
block to advance progress in other areas, especially in financing, and ingovernance reform of the international and regional financial institutions basedon proposals discussed and agreed upon previously within the UN system. A
post-2015 framework must outline, in the most detailed manner possible withconcrete commitments and timely targets, steps to transform the current global
governance architecture. We cannot forget that the “implementation gap” in theaction plans of United Nations conferences over the decades, including in the
MDGs, has been to a strong degree the result of breakdowns in global
governance, especially regarding financial resources necessary for theirimplementation.
Post-2015 systems of accountability
For accountable governance to be universally applicable as well as meaningful
and effective over time, systems of accountability need to be put into place aspart and parcel of the post-2015 sustainable development commitments. Beyond
2015 is calling for the following “essential must haves” on accountability.
a) Clearly lay out enforceable accountability mechanisms, as well as theprocess for accountability at the national, regional and global level. This
must include national oversight and independent review mechanisms at
the international level.
Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-201518b) Include mechanisms for mutual accountability between governments anddonors.
c) Include mechanisms for a governmental peer review process which
includes civil society.
d) Enable citizens in developing countries to hold their governments toaccount in real time for progress on commitments made.
e) Include monitoring mechanisms with measures to disaggregate data sothat the impact on marginalised groups can be properly addressed.
f) National processes must, in the spirit of democratic ownership, involve
meaningful consultation and scrutiny by parliament and civil society.

Conclusion
In an increasingly interdependent and multi-polar world, which has witnessed afragmentation in responsibilities in recent years, it is more important than everthat the voices of ordinary people be heard and adhered to in the design,
implementation and monitoring of sustainable development policies. A post2015 framework should incorporate just governance as an essential foundationstone for sustainable development by embedding its six key pillars. Without
progress on just governance, there is a serious risk of predisposition to failure in
all other areas, with a mirage of success belying the absence a truly
transformative sustainable development agenda.
** *Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-2015
19

Annex 1. About this paper
This paper, issued on behalf of Beyond 2015, was drafted by the Governance Drafting Committee
composed of the organizations and individuals below. The original draft was produced through abroad consultation and survey process with Beyond 2015 members, which elicited several inputs
from organizations worldwide.21 In total, comments and feedback were received from 22
organizations. The redrafting was then coordinated by CESR and GCAP, incorporating all of the
inputs received. In accordance with the Beyond 2015 protocol on forming policy positions, thefinal version was signed off unanimously by the Executive Committee of Beyond 2015.
Whilst participating Beyond 2015 organisations have a range of views regarding the content of apost-2015 framework, the campaign is united in working to bring about the following outcome: A global overarching cross-thematic framework to succeed the Millennium Development
Goals, reflecting Beyond 2015’s policy positions.
 The process of developing this framework is participatory, inclusive and responsive to
voices of those directly affected by poverty and injustice.
Special thanks to the B2015 Governance Drafting Committee:
1. Niko Lusiani, Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR) (co-coordinator)
2. Caitlin Blaser, Global Call to Action Against Poverty (GCAP), South Africa (cocoordinator)
3. Nana Afadzinu, West Africa Civil Society Institute, Ghana
4. Harold Aidoo, Institute for Research and Democratic Development (IREDD), Liberia
5. Meheret Ayenew, Africa Civil Society Platform on Principled Partnership (ACP), Ethiopia
6. Craig Fagan, Transparency International, Germany
7. Melissa Lawson, Tearfund, UK
8. Paul Okumu, Africa Civil Society Platform on Principled Partnership (ACP) Secretariat,
Kenya
9. Mary Teresa McBride, Trocaire, Ireland
10. Nzovu Job Ruzage, Human Rights First Rwanda Association, Rwanda
11. Gilad Tanay, Academics Stand Against Poverty (ASAP), USA
12. Farooq Ullah, Stakeholder Forum, UK
13. Josep Xercavins, WDGpa, Catalonia, Spain
In addition, thanks are offered to all the organizations which responded to the B2015 governancecall for inputs: ACT Alliance, ATD-4th World, Christian Aid, Development Initiatives, Earth Law
Center, Micah Challenge, People’s Movement for Human Rights Learning (PDHRE), Sinergia
Association-Venezuela, VSO, and World Vision. And thanks also to ASAP’s Quick Response Teamfor their valuable inputs. Additional words of appreciation to all those who were quoted in thisdocument from distinct grassroots community hearings, consultations, focus groups andparticipatory research on post-2015 priorities conducted by GCAP and Trocaire-Ireland,
respectively. All your voices were fundamental to this process.

21

All final submissions to the B2015 governance call for inputs are available here:
https://docs.google.com/folder/d/0B6uDYouHEJ6aNXpiUktQUEdpVGM/edit

Just Governance: A critical cornerstone for an equitable and human rights-centered sustainable
development agenda post-201520