A I IDA16 Results Measurement System

IDA16ResultsMeasurement
SystemInternational Development Association
T H E WO RL D B A N K ’S FU N D FO R TH E POOR ES T

B I IDA16 Results Measurement System

What is the Results Measurement System for IDA?
For more than a decade, IDA has been measuring its role inhelping countries grow and reduce poverty and informing donors
about the effectiveness of their contributions. The Results
Measurement System (RMS) for IDA16 uses an integrated
results and performance framework to show aggregatedresults across IDA countries. It assesses IDA’s contributionto development results, and is linked to the Millennium
Development Goals. It also shows whether IDA is managing its
operations and services effectively and is functioning efficiently.
The RMS groups indicators into four tiers. The first twotiers track aggregate country development results and IDA’scontribution to these development results. The other two
capture elements of performance against agreed IDA16
performance standards in an “IDA Report Card”. The fourtiers are: (1) IDA Countries’ Progress; (2) IDA-SupportedDevelopment Results; (3) IDA Operational Effectiveness; and (4)IDA Organizational Effectiveness.
For more information and specifics on each indicator, please see
Annex 1 of the IDA16 Deputies’ Report: http://www.worldbank.
org/ida/papers/IDA16_Replenishment/IDA16_Report-EnglishFinal.pdf.

1 I IDA16 Results Measurement System

TIER 1: IDA Countries’ Progress
Tier 1 of the IDA16 RMS provides a snapshot of IDA-eligible countries’ progress on key development outcomes. It measures key
development indicators on growth and poverty reduction; governance; private sector development; infrastructure; gender and humandevelopment; and climate change.
IDA16Deputies’ Current Current
Report * ValueYear

Baseline
Value

BaselineYear

GDP per capita (constant 2000 US$)

506

2005

618

678

2011

Percent of population below US$1.25 a day (%)

42.7

2005

42.4

38.8

2008

3.24

2005

3.36

3.27

2011

Trade Logistics Performance Index(average rating: 1=low to 5=high for IDA countries)

2.3

2007

2.5

2.4

2012

Time required for business start-up (average number of days)

54

2005

3532

2011

Fixed line and mobile phone subscribers(average number per 100 people)

11

2005

3760

2010

Access to an improved water source (% of population)

76

2005

77.4802010

Access to improved sanitation (% of population)

35

2005

37.2

38

2010

Halve between 1990 and 2015

Access to an all-season road (% of the rural population)

61

2000

61

61

2000

Halve between 1990 and 2015

Household electrification rate (% of households)

57

2005

61.5

61

2008

Under 5 mortality rate (per 1,000 live births)

101

2005

104

89

2010

Reduce by two-thirds between
1990 and 2015

Prevalence of HIV/AIDS (% of population aged 15-49)

1.3

2005

1.4

1.2

2009

Halt by 2015 and begin to reverse

Births attended by skilled health staff (% of total births)44

2005

45.5

54

2010

Primary completion rate (% of children of primary school age)
Girls
Boys

74
69
78

2005
2005
2005

80.4
74.8
81.4

82
79
83

2010
2010
2010

Ratio of girls to boys in primary and secondary education (%)

89

2005

90.7

93

2010

Ratio of female to male labor force participation (%)

61

2005

56.9

58

2010

Adolescent fertility rate (births per 1,000 women ages 15-19)

91

2005

76.3

81

2010

Maternal mortality ratio (modeled estimate, per 100,000 live births)

430

2005

430

340

2010

Malnutrition prevalence, weight for age(% of children under 5)31200533.227

20100.9

2005

1.01.02008

Indicator

2015 MDG Target

Growth and Poverty Reduction

Halve between 1990 and 2015

Governance
Quality of budgetary and financial management(average rating: 1=low to 6=high for IDA countries)
Private Sector Development

Infrastructure

Gender and Human Development

Climate Change
CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita)* Reflects latest data available as of December 2010 (see Annex 1 of the IDA16 Report).

100%

100%

Reduce by three-quarters
between 1990 and 2015

2 I IDA16 Results Measurement System

TIER 2: IDA-Supported Development Results
Tier 2 indicators track IDA’s performance in supporting country development results. First, it tracks indicators that measure
the overall outcomes of IDA’s CASs, operations and analytical and advisory activities. Second, it tracks aggregate project output
and outcome indicators in sectors for which core sector indicators have been developed.

Results as per IDA16
Deputies’ Report

CurrentResults

IDA16 PerformanceStandards

Country Assistance Strategies Completion Reports (IEG ratings)

4448

66

Operations in all IDA countries (IEG ratings)

74

69 *75

Operations in IDA countries in fragile situations (IEG ratings)6970 **70

Analytical and Advisory Activities (ESW and non-lending TA)

68

67

75Indicator
A. Satisfactory Achievement of Development Outcomes (percentage)

B. Sectoral Outputs

Projected Outputs by 2015

Educating children
Teachers recruited and/or trained

0.9 million

0.9 million

1.0-1.2 million

Children immunized

85 million

135 million

99-116 million

Pregnant women receiving antenatal care during a visit to a health provider

0.7 million

50 million

0.8-1.0 million

People with access to a basic package of health, nutrition or population services

13 million

19 million

15-18 million

32 thousand

34 thousand

37-44 thousand

Protecting and saving lives

Building and accessing vital infrastructure
Roads constructed or rehabilitated (km)People with access to improved water sources

31 million

33 million

36-42 million

People with access to improved sanitation facilities

1.6 million

2.5 million

1.8-2.2 million* 69% by number of operations; 75% by amount of commitments.
** 70% by number of operations; 81% by amount of commitments.

3 I IDA16 Results Measurement SystemTIER 3: IDA Operational Effectiveness
Tier 3 indicators track the operational effectiveness of IDA products. Key indicators include the performance of IDA’s portfolio(including overall quality of design), the results orientation of its operations (including through the use of impact evaluations), thestrengthening and use of country systems, and focus on special themes.

Performanceas per IDA16
Deputies’ Report

CurrentPerformance

IDA16
PerformanceStandards

Quality of design (%)

698175

Disbursement ratio for investment lending projects (%)

252225

Disbursement ratio for investment lending projects in FCCs (%)

272525

Aid predictability (%)*

655171

Investment lending projects that have appropriate results frameworks (%)

99

100

100

First Implementation Status and Results Reports with adequate baselines for at least one keyoutcome indicator (%)

9191

95

IDA Implementation Completion and Results Reports (ICRs) that report on key results (%)

92

95

100

Impact evaluations (#)

1416 (23 in FY12)

17

Use of country Monitoring and Evaluation systems (%)

73

72

75

Use of country systems for Financial Management (%)*

6271

65

Use of country systems for Procurement (%)*

5255

55

Collaborative Analytical and Advisory Activities (%)*

595966

Proportion of IDA CASs drawing on and discussing the findings of gender assessments (%)

NA100

Full implementationof Policy

Proportion of IDA projects that are gender-informed (%)

46

Proportion of IDA CASs that discuss climate change vulnerabilities (%)

NAIndicator
Portfolio Performance

Monitoring and Evaluation

Use of Country Systems

Implementation of IDA16 Special Themes* Paris Declaration Monitoring Survey Data, covers both IDA and IBRD.
** New methodology.

76 (86 in FY12) **10060100

4 I IDA16 Results Measurement SystemTIER 4: IDA Organizational Effectiveness
Tier 4 measures IDA’s organizational effectiveness in terms of speed and cost, decentralization, and mapping for results.
These indicators reflect areas of internal reforms that the Bank is undertaking to further enhance efficiency, effectiveness andvalue for money in achieving development results in IDA countries.

Performance as per
IDA16 Deputies’
ReportCurrentPerformance

IDA16 PerformanceStandards

Time from project concept note to approval for investment lending (months)

15.1

12.9

12Time from project concept note to approval for investment lending in FCCs (months)

Indicator
Speed and Cost

12.6

10.212Problem projects restored to “satisfactory” status within 12 months (%)

7070

80

Average project preparation costs ($ ‘000)

332

316

325

Average project implementation support costs ($ ‘000)

131

142

135

Decentralization of higher level staff to the field (%)

273330Decentralization of task management to staff in the field working on
Fragile situations (%)
Non-fragile situations (%)

3038

37
43

35
45

45

100

100

Decentralization

Mapping for Results
IDA projects that are geo-coded (%)

5 I IDA16 Results Measurement SystemThe International Development Association(IDA) is the part of the World Bank that helps
the world’s poorest countries. Establishedin 1960, IDA aims to reduce poverty byproviding loans (called “credits”) and grants
for programs that boost economic growth,
reduce inequalities, and improve people’s living
conditions.
For more on IDA, visit: www.worldbank.org/ida
or www.facebook.com/ida.wbg

The World Bank’s Fund for the Poorest I IDA
1818 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20433
USAwww.worldbank.org/ida
www.facebook.com/ida.wbg
www.youtube.com/worldbank