Signal Integrity:
Frequency Range Matters!
By Jon Martens and Bob Buxton

Introduction
Higher data rates introduce new challenges for test solutions. There are several
20+ Gbit/s high speed standards (Table 1) that are driving the upper end of thetest spectrum to 70 GHz and even 110 GHz. Along with the design trade-offs
related to choices of vias, stackups, and connector pins, accurate measurements
are needed to better understand new challenges related to conductor skin effects
and dielectric losses on PC boards. For many of these measurements, it isnecessary to collect data that includes higher value harmonic frequencies.
Standard

Data Rate

Number of Lanes

CEI-25G-SR

19.90 to 28.05 Gbit/s

1 to N

CEI-25G-LR

19.90 to 25.80 Gbit/s

1 to N25.78125 Gbit/s

428.05 Gbit/s

125.78125 Gbit/s

1 to N

IEEE802.3ba 100GBASE-LR/ER
32G Fiber Channel
Infiniband 26G-IB-EDR
Table 1. 20+ Gbit/s High Speed Standards.

When using Vector Network Analyzers (VNAs) to evaluate backplane andinterconnects, one of the most basic considerations is the frequency range overwhich to make S-parameter measurements. The choice of frequency range affects
the ability to locate defects, the correlation between simulations andmeasurements, and ultimately the ability to make good decisions concerning cost/
performance trade-offs.
This white paper discusses the importance of both high and low frequency test
limits and also their impact on your time domain results.

High-Speed Harmonics Increase Required Frequency Range
It will come as no surprise that as bit rates increase, then the upper frequency limit for evaluating
backplane and interconnect transmission characteristics must also increase. Higher speeds
basically translate into higher test frequencies being required to perform measurements to the 3rdor 5th harmonic of the NRZ clock frequency. For example, for a 28 Gbps data rate, this means
either 42 GHz or 70 GHz stop frequency for an S-parameter sweep. Figure 1 shows a spectrum ofa 14 GHz square wave which would be the clock frequency for a 28 Gbps NRZ signal. This
example shows the spectrum after the signal has been passed through a connector/cable
assembly. Attenuating the harmonics of the clock frequency will distort the signal and hence theneed to characterize the frequency response of transmission media to higher frequencies – ideallyto at least the 5th harmonic.

Figure 1. Harmonic Content of 28 Gbps NRZ Clock Signal.

Upper Frequency Data Impact on Simulation Stability
There is another way to think about the requirement for the upper measurement frequency; that isfrom the viewpoint of causality. Causality is simply a statement that the output from an electrical
network should occur after the stimulus. Lack of causality, where the output appears to occur prior
to the stimulus, can be observed when poor S-parameter data is transformed into the time domain
for use in circuit or other simulations. Non-causal S-parameter data can be the cause of unstable
simulations which may not converge to a solution or may lead to inaccurate results.
One cause of poor S-parameter data is insufficient higher frequency data. For ideal causality,S-parameter data would be available from DC to infinity – not a very practical situation, at least for
the upper limit. Figure 2 shows the time domain representation computed from S-parameterdatasets with upper frequency limits of 40 GHz and 110 GHz. As can be seen, the negative-time(non-causal) energy is much greater for the 40 GHz situation. The vertical scale is small in
Figure 2 but even this level of energy can matter in many simulations.

2Figure 2. Non-Causal Results for Various Data-Set Bandwidths

In theory, massaging the frequency domain data can reduce these problems; however this canlead to potential issues related to distorting the actual physical behavior of the device. It istherefore often safer and more accurate to use as wide a frequency range as possible up to thepoint where repeatability and related distortions obscure the results (e.g., the DUT starts radiating
efficiently making the measurement very dependent on the surroundings). The desire for wider
frequency range data becomes more compelling as faster and more complex transients are being
studied in the higher level simulations.
Near-DC Measurements – No Less Important
Once the upper frequency need has been addressed, it is time to look at the other end of thespectrum. It is important to remember that accurate measurements to the lowest possible
frequency are still very important for signal integrity applications.
Often times the accuracy of your models can be improved by measuring down to as close toDC as possible. For example, consider the case where the measured S-parameter data for a
backplane is fed into a software model in order to estimate the impact of that backplane on theeye pattern. Figure 3 shows what the eye pattern estimate will look like where the low frequency
data has some error. In this example, it was found that a 0.5 dB error injected at a lower frequency(<10 MHz) on transmission could take an 85% open eye to a fully closed eye. Since mid-band(10 GHz) transmission uncertainty may be near 0.1 dB depending on setup and calibration – andhigher at low frequencies – this eye distortion effect cannot be neglected.

3

Figure 3. With 0.5 dB insertion loss error at 10 MHz the eye pattern appears to be closed .

Figure 4 shows how the resulting eye pattern will look if the low frequency measurement data is ofgood quality and extends down to 70 kHz. This prediction correlates very well with the actual eye
pattern measured using an oscilloscope as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 4. Accurate S-parameter data down to 70 kHz
reveals an 85% open eye pattern.

Figure 5. Measured eye pattern on an oscilloscopeverifies the accurate S-parameter result.

Since the non-transitioning parts of the eye-diagram are inherently composed of low frequency
behavior, the sensitivity of the calculation to the low frequency S-parameter data makes sense.
Since the low frequency insertion losses tend to be small, a large fixed-dB error (which is how
VNA uncertainties tend to behave) can be particularly damaging.

4Time Domain – it’s a question of both upper and lower frequency data
Passive components, as well as near-end and far-end points between daughter boards, must bemeasured in the frequency and time domains to assure that the transmission characteristics ateach measurement point meet the standards. Using the best resolution capability improves yourability to locate discontinuities, impedance changes, and crosstalk issues.
The time domain performance of a VNA is critical when trying to locate defects. In general, thewider the frequency-sweep, the better is the time and hence spatial resolution. Figure 6 clearlyshows the benefits of using S-parameter data captured over a wide frequency bandwidth.

Figure 6. The time domain resolution benefits of wider frequency bandwidths are clearly shownin these measurements of a short at the end of a fixture arm based on 40 GHz and 110 GHz data.

Lack of good low frequency S-parameter data can also lead to further complications whenconverting into the time domain either for measurement of impedance changes along a line or formodeling. Resolution is maximized when Low-Pass time domain mode is used. This mode also
permits characterization of impedance changes on the backplane. Low-Pass mode requires aquasi-harmonically related set of frequencies that start at the lowest frequency possible. ADC term is extrapolated that provides a phase reference, so the true nature of a discontinuity canbe evaluated. Hence, the lower the start frequency is, the better the extrapolation of the DC term.

5Figure 7 shows how the DC extrapolation of data can vary significantly depending on the lower
frequency measurement cut-off point. In this case, extrapolation of measurement results from ananalyzer with a minimum start frequency of f1 would predict a value for the DC term, whereas aset of results that more closely approaches zero Hz (f2) would provide a better DC extrapolation.

Figure 7. DC Extrapolation from measured S-parameter data.

A poorly estimated DC term then leads to an erroneous view of a device under test. Figure 8shows the situation for a step change in reflection coefficient. Prior to 200 ps, the impedance ofthe line was 50 ohm and after that zero ohms. With a bad DC extrapolation, the 50 ohm section
can clearly be seen to show sloping impedance along its length, whereas with a good
extrapolation, the 50 ohm line is seen correctly.

Figure 8. Impact of poor DC extrapolation on time domain results.

6Getting the Best of Both Worlds
From the foregoing it can be seen that the ideal VNA would have as a low a start frequency as
possible and a stop frequency as high as required based on the bit rate and causality concerns.
A VNA depends on directional devices to sample forward and reverse direction signals in order tomake the various ratio measurements to compute the S-parameters. Typically microwave couplers
are used. However, the coupling performance of these devices unfortunately degrades at lower
frequencies, below say 1 GHz, which reduces the dynamic range and the uncertainty of lower
frequency measurements. A bridge allows one to go much lower in frequency without performancedegradation since it does not rely on pure geometrical length (in wavelengths) to accomplish thecoupling. Rather, the bridge uses lumped impedance sources at low frequencies and distributed
ones at higher frequencies to accomplish the coupling. Analyzers are available that use a hybrid
approach: coupler based architectures for the higher frequencies, and bridge based coupling
devices at the lower frequencies.

Conclusion
As data rates increase, signal integrity engineers require ever widening frequency ranges and test
equipment that maintains the accuracy they are used to. Vector Network Analyzers play a key rolein helping them meet these challenges so they can make appropriate cost/performance trade-offs.
When selecting a VNA, the users should be looking to maximize both their upper and lower
frequency limits.

7• United States
Anritsu Company• Italy
Anritsu S.r.l.

• Singapore
Anritsu Pte. Ltd.

1155 East Collins Blvd., Suite 100, Richardson,
TX 75081, U.S.A.
Toll Free: 1-800-267-4878
Phone: +1-972-644-1777
Fax: +1-972-671-1877

Via Elio Vittorini 129, 00144 Roma, Italy
Phone: +39-6-509-9711
Fax: +39-6-502-2425

60 Alexandra Terrace, #02-08, The Comtech (Lobby A)
Singapore 118502
Phone: +65-6282-2400
Fax: +65-6282-2533• Canada
Anritsu Electronics Ltd.
700 Silver Seven Road, Suite 120, Kanata,Ontario K2V 1C3, Canada
Phone: +1-613-591-2003
Fax: +1-613-591-1006• SwedenAnritsu AB
Borgarfjordsgatan 13A, 164 40 KISTA, Sweden
Phone: +46-8-534-707-00
Fax: +46-8-534-707-30• Finland
Anritsu AB• Brazil
Anritsu Eletrônica Ltda.

Teknobulevardi 3-5, FI-01530 VANTAA, Finland
Phone: +358-20-741-8100
Fax: +358-20-741-8111

Praça Amadeu Amaral, 27 - 1 Andar
01327-010 - Bela Vista - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
Phone: +55-11-3283-2511
Fax: +55-11-3288-6940• DenmarkAnritsu A/S (Service Assurance)
Anritsu AB (Test & Measurement)• Mexico
Anritsu Company, S.A. de C.V.
Av. Ejército Nacional No. 579 Piso 9, Col. Granada
11520 México, D.F., México
Phone: +52-55-1101-2370
Fax: +52-55-5254-3147• United Kingdom
Anritsu EMEA Ltd.
200 Capability Green, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 3LU, U.K.
Phone: +44-1582-433280
Fax: +44-1582-731303• France
Anritsu S.A.

Kay Fiskers Plads 9, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
Phone: +45-7211-2200
Fax: +45-7211-2210• Russia
Anritsu EMEA Ltd.
Representation Office in Russia
Tverskaya str. 16/2, bld. 1, 7th floor.
Russia, 125009, Moscow
Phone: +7-495-363-1694
Fax: +7-495-935-8962• United Arab Emirates
Anritsu EMEA Ltd.

12 avenue du Québec, Bâtiment Iris 1- Silic 612,
91140 VILLEBON SUR YVETTE, France
Phone: +33-1-60-92-15-50
Fax: +33-1-64-46-10-65

Dubai Liaison Office
P O Box 500413 - Dubai Internet City
Al Thuraya Building, Tower 1, Suite 701, 7th Floor
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Phone: +971-4-3670352
Fax: +971-4-3688460• Germany
Anritsu GmbH• India
Anritsu India Private Limited

Nemetschek Haus, Konrad-Zuse-Platz 181829 München, Germany
Phone: +49-89-442308-0
Fax: +49-89-442308-55

2nd & 3rd Floor, #837/1, Binnamangla 1st Stage,
Indiranagar, 100ft Road, Bangalore - 560038, India
Phone: +91-80-4058-1300
Fax: +91-80-4058-1301®Anritsu All trademarks are registered trademarks oftheir respective companies. Data subject to change
without notice. For the most recent specifications visit:www.anritsu.com• P.R. China (Shanghai)
Anritsu (China) Co., Ltd.
Room 2701-2705, Tower A,
New Caohejing International Business Center
No. 391 Gui Ping Road Shanghai, 200233, P.R. China
Phone: +86-21-6237-0898
Fax: +86-21-6237-0899• P.R. China (Hong Kong)
Anritsu Company Ltd.
Unit 1006-7, 10/F., Greenfield Tower, Concordia Plaza,No. 1 Science Museum Road, Tsim Sha Tsui East,
Kowloon, Hong Kong, P.R. China
Phone: +852-2301-4980
Fax: +852-2301-3545• JapanAnritsu Corporation
8-5, Tamura-cho, Atsugi-shi, Kanagawa, 243-0016 Japan
Phone: +81-46-296-1221
Fax: +81-46-296-1238• Korea
Anritsu Corporation, Ltd.
502, 5FL H-Square N B/D, 681
Sampyeong-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si,Gyeonggi-do, 463-400 Korea
Phone: +82-31-696-7750
Fax: +82-31-696-7751• Australia
Anritsu Pty. Ltd.
Unit 21/270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill,
Victoria 3168, Australia
Phone: +61-3-9558-8177
Fax: +61-3-9558-8255• Taiwan
Anritsu Company Inc.
7F, No. 316, Sec. 1, NeiHu Rd., Taipei 114, Taiwan
Phone: +886-2-8751-1816
Fax: +886-2-8751-1817

11410-0661, Rev. B Printed in United States 2013-08©2013 Anritsu Company. All Rights Reserved