Owner and author of this document
Legal Address
International Project Management Association (IPMA)
c/o Advokaturbüro Maurer & Stäger, Fraumünsterstrasse 17,
Postfach 2018, CH-8022 Zurich, Switzerland

Operational Address
International Project Management Association (IPMA),
P.O. Box 1167 NL-3860 BD Nijkerk, The Netherlands

Copyright©2016 International Project Management Association (IPMA®)
All rights reserved (including those of translation into other languages).
No part of this document may be reproduced in any form - by photo print, microfilm or any other means - nortransmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission.
IPMA® and IPMA ICB® is a registered trademark of IPMA in Switzerland and protected by law in mostcountries.
IPMA International Certification Regulations (IPMA ICR) Version 4.0 (public) ISBN: 978-94-92338-08-2

Author
Joseph Alba (United Kingdom) (Leading editor)
Dalibor Cron (Switzerland)
Mimoun El Ouarti (The Netherlands)
Giuseppe Pugliese (Italy)
Werner Schmehr (Germany)
Leh Simonelli (Australia)
Jorunn Wolstad (Norway)® 2016 International Project Management Association2

Introduction
This document has been developed with the objective of summarising the key features
within the International Project Management Association International Certification
Regulations (IPMA ICR) Version 4.0 approved by the IPMA Council of Delegates during its
50th anniversary in Panama on 27th September 2015. It is known as IPMA ICR Version 4.0(Public).
The intended targeted audiences of this document include:•

IPMA certification applicants and candidates; and•external bodies and organisations attracted by the IPMA certification process

The IPMA Four Level Certification (IPMA 4-L-C) System for project management personnel
is managed by IPMA through the IPMA Certification and Validation Management Board(CVMB).
The 4-L-C System and the IPMA ICR 4.0 that supports the certification system is applied
within each participating nation by the corresponding IPMA Certification Body (CB) and are
based on ISO/IEC 17024:2012 (Conformity Assessment – General requirements for bodies
operating certification of persons).
The CB certification scheme:•

defines the frame of reference for competences to be assessed using the IPMA
Individual Competence Baseline (IPMA ICB); and•conforms to a common IPMA regulatory framework of the IPMA International
Certification Regulations (IPMA ICR).

CBs are validated every three years by IPMA under the terms of their IPMA agreement as ameans of checking compliance with the IPMA ICR and to exchange good practice where
possible.
The IPMA 4-L-C System operates with three domains: project, programme and portfolio
management and four levels of competence:•

IPMA Level A•

IPMA Level B•

IPMA Level C•

IPMA Level D

Applicant eligibility criteria and areas of responsibility expected for project, programme andportfolio management are identified for each role.
There are several steps in the certification process in which the candidate needs to provide
evidence of competence.
The level of competence of a candidate is evaluated by assessors who are trained in the
IPMA certification assessment process. The IPMA certification assessment process is aframework of structured evaluation that is fair, valid and reliable based on candidate
evidence.
Re-certification is required after a five-year period for all IPMA levels and is based onevidence of continuing involvement in project, programme or portfolio management at theappropriate level and evidence of continuing professional development.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

3

Certification for individuals using the IPMA 4-L-C System is a means of providing assurance
that the certified person meets the requirements of competence. Confidence in therespective certification schemes for individuals is achieved by means of a globally accepted
process of assessment and periodic reassessments of the competence of people who are
certified.
One of the characteristic functions of a CB is to ensure that IPMA assessments are
conducted in an appropriate manner using defined competence criteria for evaluation.
The complete IPMA Certification Regulations serve as the basis for the recognition within
IPMA of each CB and their certification schemes in order to facilitate acceptance of theirresults at the national and international levels.
Through the CBs’ implementation of the IPMA 4-L-C System, IPMA helps to establish anenvironment for mutual recognition and a platform for the global exchange of professionals
in project, programme and portfolio management.
The IPMA ICR specify requirements that ensure that each of the CBs operating the IPMA 4L-C System operate in a consistent, comparable and reliable manner such that a candidatethat is certified by one CB would, under the same circumstances, be certified by any other.
The requirements in the IPMA ICR are specific and audited under the IPMA validation
process.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

4

Chapter 1
1.1 The mission and purpose of the Certification Body
1.1.1 The mission and purpose of each IPMA Certification Body (CB) is to implement andmaintain the IPMA 4-L-C System in a country or region. The ongoing maintenance,development and dissolution (if necessary) is undertaken in accordance with IPMA policies,
procedures, structures and practices.
1.1.2 As part of its responsibilities, each CB documents its practices in the certification ofindividuals and ensures that the practices it employs do not negatively impact on theimpartiality of its certification activities. Each CB establishes, maintains and complies with
up-to-date written procedures and is responsible for addressing any concerns in thedevelopment, delivery and award of certification. Furthermore, each CB ensures thatinvestigations are carried out rigorously and effectively by persons of appropriatecompetence who have no personal interest in the outcome.
1.1.3 Each CB acts impartially in relation to its applicants, candidates and certified
individuals ensuring its personnel declare any perceived or actual conflicts of interest.
1.1.4 Each CB does not impose restrictions or undue processes that dissuade applicants orcandidates from certification and ensure that certification is made openly available to all. In
particular, each CB does not restrict certification to those that are only members of its IPMA
Member Association (MA).

Figure 1-1: Certification Body (CB) organisation® 2016 International Project Management Association5

1.1.5 The CB organisation, shown above, establishes, documents, implements andmaintains a management system that is capable of supporting and complying with therequirements of the complete IPMA Certification Regulations. The CB in particularsafeguards impartiality and ensures conflicts of interest are addressed.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

6

Chapter 2
2.1 IPMA principles of certification
2.1.1

The following principles of certification are used for assessments so that they are:•fair, using a standard process and treating all candidates equally;•

valid, asking only for evidence which is appropriate for the competence(s)being
assessed;•reliable and consistent, such that each candidate would receive the sameassessment outcome if assessed by different assessors, and that each assessor
applies the same principles to each candidate they assess;•based on current and recent evidence at the level being assessed;•

based on sufficient evidence for a robust judgement to be made by an assessor;•

based on authentic evidence, which can be verified as that of the candidate;•accurate, using different assessment methods throughout the process; and•transparent, so that the candidate is aware of all of the process of assessment,
associated costs and the basis on which assessors’ judgements will be made.

2.1.2
To remain impartial, the IPMA Certification Body (CB) will not influence a
candidate’s decision to certify by implying that it would be easier, simpler or cheaper if
specific coaching, training or education services are used. The CB does not offer education,
training or coaching in project, programme, or portfolio management to a candidate anddoes not require a candidate to complete specific education, training or coaching for
certification.
2.1.3
Each CB can demonstrate that confidentiality, information security and impartiality
are not compromised throughout the certification process and that confidentiality is strictly
maintained except where required by law or where previously authorised by the individual(s)affected.

2.2 IPMA 4-L-C System
2.2.1 The IPMA sets out the international specification for certification as the owner of thescheme.
2.2.2

The international specification identifies:•

the required components of the certification process for each level and domain ofcertification including candidate eligibility criteria;•

which combination of Competence Elements (CEs) from the IPMA Individual
Competence Baseline (IPMA ICB) is required to be assessed for each level anddomain;•which assessment methods will be used by each CB for each level and domain;•

the extent and nature of evidence required from candidates to achieve certification;and•the threshold values for certification to be achieved.

2.2.3 Each CB ensures that, on delivery of every assessment for certification that it makes
available, the content of the assessment is:•fit for purpose;® 2016 International Project Management Association

7

•

appropriate for the method of assessment chosen; and•consistent with the specification for the certification level and domain applied for.

2.2.4

Each CB ensures that each assessment adheres to IPMA’s principles of certification.

2.2.5 Recognising that IPMA certification is global and to ensure consistency ofassessment, each CB ensures that its internal and published documentation is available ineach language used for certification to assess a candidate so that they are notdisadvantaged.
2.2.6 Each CB ensures that it provides equal access to all potential candidates,
irrespective of race, colour, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, ethnic group,
disability or other personal characteristics for each of the IPMA certification levels anddomains which it makes available.
2.2.7 Similarly, the CB may approve reasonable adjustments to an assessment so as toenable a candidate to demonstrate his or her knowledge, skills and abilities by taking into
account any special consideration declared and evidenced at the time of application.

2.3 IPMA 4-L-C level definitions
2.3.1 There are four levels in the IPMA 4-L-C System – Levels A, B, C and D. The IPMA
level definitions are constructed against the following core criteria:•

Level A is constructed in terms of the leadership of others in very complex projects(programmes or portfolios) throughout the life cycle (where applicable) at a strategiclevel.

•

Level B is constructed in terms of the leadership of others in projects (programmes or
portfolios) and includes complexity throughout the life cycle (where applicable).

•

Level C is constructed in terms of the management of others in projects of moderatecomplexity throughout the life cycle through the application of knowledge/theory
across all relevant competences.

•

Level D is constructed in terms of knowledge across all relevant competences only.

2.3.2 There are three domains in the IPMA 4-L-C System – project, programme andportfolio. In the three domains, projects have four levels (A, B, C and D); programme andportfolio each have two levels (A and B). This creates eight profiles in the IPMA 4-L-C
System as shown below:

Level

DomainProject

Programme

Portfolio

A

Certified Project
Director

Certified Programme
Director

Certified Portfolio
Director

B

Certified Senior ProjectManager

Certified Senior
Programme Manager

Certified Senior
Portfolio Manager

C

Certified ProjectManagerD

Certified ProjectManagement Associate

Table 1: IPMA 4-L-C System profiles® 2016 International Project Management Association

8

2.4 IPMA profiles and eligibility criteria
2.4.1

2.4.2

2.4.3

2.4.4

2.4.5

2.4.6

IPMA Level D: Certified Project Management Associate.
An IPMA certification at Level D requires that the candidate has knowledge in the
CEs related to project management. As such, they usually have broad project
management knowledge and may work in a project team.
Eligibility criteria: There is no previous experience required and only knowledge
CEs related to project management are assessed.
IPMA Level C: Certified Project Manager
An IPMA certification at Level C requires that the candidate has acted in a project
management role within a moderately complex project environment within an
organisation.
Eligibility criteria: within the last six years the candidate needs to have a minimumof three years’ experience as a project manager within projects of moderatecomplexity, or a minimum of three years’ experience in a responsible project
management role assisting the project manager in complex projects. The evidence
timescale can be extended by four years to ten years with justification.
IPMA Level B: Certified Senior Project Manager
An IPMA certification at Level B for project management requires that the candidate
has acted in a complex project environment within an organisation.
Eligibility criteria: within the last eight years the candidate needs to have aminimum of five years’ experience as a project manager of which at least three years
were in a responsible leadership function managing complex projects. The evidence
timescale can be extended by four years to twelve years with justification.
IPMA Level B: Certified Senior Programme Manager
An IPMA certification at Level B for programme management requires that thecandidate has acted in a complex programme environment within an organisation.
Eligibility criteria: within the last eight years the candidate needs to have aminimum of five years’ experience as a programme manager of which at least three
years were in a responsible leadership function managing complex programmes. The
evidence timescale can be extended by four years to twelve years with justification.
IPMA Level B: Certified Senior Portfolio Manager
An IPMA certification at Level B for portfolio management requires that the candidate
has acted in a complex portfolio environment within an organisation.
Eligibility criteria: within the last eight years the candidate needs to have aminimum of five years’ experience as a portfolio manager of which at least three
years were in a responsible leadership function managing complex portfolios. The
evidence timescale can be extended by four years to twelve years with justification.
IPMA Level A: Certified Project Director
An IPMA certification at Level A for project management requires that the candidate
has acted in a very complex project environment that has a strategic impact on theorganisation.
Eligibility criteria: within the last 12 years, the candidate needs to have a minimumof five years’ experience as a project manager in a responsible leadership function in® 2016 International Project Management Association

92.4.72.4.8

very complex projects of which at least three years were at a strategic level. The
evidence timescale cannot be extended.
IPMA Level A: Certified Programme Director
An IPMA certification at Level A for programme management requires that thecandidate has acted in a very complex programme environment that has a strategic
impact on the organisation.
Eligibility criteria: within the last 12 years, the candidate needs to have a minimumof five years’ experience as a programme manager in a responsible leadershipfunction in very complex programmes at a strategic level, or a minimum of four years’
experience as a programme manager in a responsible leadership function in very
complex programmes and a minimum of three years’ experience as a project
manager in a responsible leadership function managing very complex projects at a
strategic level. The evidence timescale cannot be extended.
IPMA Level A: Certified Portfolio Director
An IPMA certification at Level A for portfolio management requires that the candidate
has acted in a very complex portfolio environment that has a strategic impact on theorganisation.
Eligibility criteria: within the last 12 years, the candidate needs to have a minimumof five years’ experience as a portfolio manager in a responsible leadership function
in very complex portfolios at a strategic level or a minimum of four years ofexperience as a portfolio manager in a responsible leadership function in very
complex portfolios and a minimum of three years’ experience as a project orprogramme manager in a responsible leadership function managing very complex
projects or programmes at a strategic level. The evidence timescale cannot be
extended.

2.5 Complexity of projects, programmes and portfolios
2.5.1 Project, programme and portfolio complexity is evaluated based on the requirementsof eligibility for each certification level, and candidates use suitable examples of evidence for
their application to meet the complexity criteria. The evaluation of complexity of each project,programme or portfolio covers:
2.5.2

Capability-based indicators•

Objectives and assessment of results (output-related complexity): this indicator
describes the complexity originating from vague, exacting and mutually conflicting
goals, objectives, requirements and expectations.

•

Processes, methods, tools and techniques (process-related complexity): thisindicator describes the complexity related to the number of tasks, assumptions andconstraints and their interdependence; the processes and process quality
requirements; the team and communication structure; and the availability of
supporting methods, tools and techniques.

•

Resources including finance (input-related complexity): this indicator describes
complexities relating to acquiring and funding the necessary budgets (possibly fromseveral sources); the diversity or lack of availability of resources (both human andother); and the processes and activities needed to manage the financial and resource
aspects, including procurement.

•

Risk and opportunities (risk-related complexity): this indicator describes complexity
related to the risk profile(s) and uncertainty levels of the project, programme or
portfolio and dependent initiatives.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

10

2.5.3

Context-based indicators•

Stakeholders and integration (strategy-related complexity): this indicator describes
the influence of formal strategy from the sponsoring organisation(s), and thestandards, regulations, informal strategies and politics which may influence theproject, programme or portfolio. Other factors may include the importance ofoutcomes for the organisation; the measure of agreement between stakeholders; theinformal power, interests and resistance surrounding the project, programme or
portfolio; and any legal or regulatory requirements.

•

Relations with permanent organisations (organisation-related complexity): thisindicator describes the amount and interrelatedness of the interfaces of the project,programme or portfolio with the organisation’s systems, structures, reporting anddecision-making processes.

•

Cultural and social context (socio-cultural complexity): this indicator describes
complexity resulting from socio-cultural dynamics. These may include interfaces withparticipants, stakeholders or organisations from different socio-cultural backgrounds
or having to deal with distributed teams.

2.5.4

Management and leadership based complexity indicators•

Leadership, teamwork and decisions (team-related complexity): this indicator
describes the management/leadership requirements from within the project,programme or portfolio. This indicator focuses on the complexity originating from therelationship with the team(s) and their maturity and hence the vision, guidance andsteering the team requires to deliver.

•

Degree of innovation and general conditions (innovation-related complexity): thisindicator describes the complexity originating from the degree of technical innovationof the project, programme or portfolio. This indicator may focus on the learning andassociated resourcefulness required to innovate and/or work with unfamiliar
outcomes, approaches, processes, tools and/or methods.

•

Demand for coordination (autonomy-related complexity): this indicator describes theamount of autonomy and responsibility that the project, programme or portfolio
manager/leader has been given or has taken/shown. This indicator focuses on
coordinating, communicating, promoting and defending the project, programme or
portfolio interests with others.

2.5.5 Complexity is measured against that of similar projects, programmes or portfolios forthe level applied for in its profile environment and each complexity indicator is scored. When
more than one project, programme or portfolio is provided by the candidate, each is
independently assessed by the assessors who only accept competence evidence fromprojects, programmes or portfolios that meet the minimum complexity requirements for thelevel at which the candidate has applied.

2.6 Competence baseline for assessment
2.6.1 The frame of reference during the assessment process is the IPMA ICB and its
component CEs. It is the IPMA standard for certification and is used for the assessment ofcandidates by each CB.
2.6.2 The IPMA ICB has a number of CEs, each of which has a number of Key
Competence Indicators (KCIs). The assessment of a candidate is undertaken at the CE level
using the KCIs to support the assessment.
2.6.3 The IPMA ICB definition of individual competence is the ‘application of knowledge,
skills and abilities in order to achieve the desired results in a work environment’:® 2016 International Project Management Association

11

•The assessment of a D-level candidate is based on knowledge where candidates candemonstrate understanding of the relevant CE in a non-complex project environment;•

The assessment of a C-level candidate is based on the demonstration of the CE
applied in a project environment of moderate complexity;•

The assessment of a B-level candidate is based on the demonstration of the CE
applied in a complex project, programme or portfolio environment.

•

The assessment of an A-level candidate is based on the demonstration of the CE
applied in a very complex project, programme or portfolio environment.

2.6.4 Exam questions, interview questions and simulation case studies used for levels A, B
and C (where appropriate) are formulated such that they allow candidates to demonstrate
the application of knowledge, skills and abilities across the various assessment methods
used.
2.6.5 To achieve Level A, candidates must demonstrate sufficient evidence of 80% of thedomain CEs defined in the IPMA ICB, in a very complex environment.
2.6.6 To achieve Level B, candidates must demonstrate sufficient evidence of 80% of thedomain CEs defined in the IPMA ICB, in a complex environment.
2.6.7 To achieve Level C, candidates must demonstrate sufficient evidence of 80% of thedomain CEs defined in the IPMA ICB, in a moderately complex environment.
2.6.8 To demonstrate sufficient evidence against a specific CE, candidates need todemonstrate a minimum of 50% of the KCIs.
2.6.9 To achieve Level D candidates must demonstrate knowledge of 80% of the domain
CEs defined in the IPMA ICB.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

12

Chapter 3
3.1 Initial certification
3.1.1 There are several equivalent, predefined IPMA paths for certification that are applied
to the certification of individuals. Each IPMA Certification Body (CB) selects from these paths
against each of the levels of certification and domains. Some CBs may have additional
requirements or certification steps that have been approved by the IPMA Certification andValidation Management Board (CVMB).
Application
CV for Initial
Certification
Executive
Summary Report
Full Self
assessment
Referees

Assessment Path for IPMA Level A ®

Feedback

Not yet eligible

Eligibility check
Pass
Report [!]Feedback

Not yet competent
Pass

Path 1

Path 2

Simulation/Role Based
Scenario [!]Extended Interview [!](Regular) Interview [!]Feedback

Not yet competentFinal evaluation
Decision
Pass
Certificate

Archive[!] = If deemed not yet competent at the first attempt step can be repeated once.

Figure 3-1: Assessment path for IPMA Level A® 2016 International Project Management Association

13

Application
CV for Initial
Certification
Executive
Summary Report
Full Self
assessment
Referees

Assessment Path for IPMA Level B ®

Feedback

Not yet eligible

Eligibility check
Pass
Exam [!]

Feedback

Not yet competent
Pass
Report [!]Feedback

Not yet competent
Pass

Path 1

Path 2

Simulation/Role Based
Scenario [!]Extended Interview [!](Regular) Interview [!]Feedback

Not yet competentFinal evaluation
Decision
Pass
Certificate

Archive[!] = If deemed not yet competent at the first attempt step can be repeated once.

Figure 3.2: Assessment path for IPMA Level B
Assessment Path for IPMA Level C ®

Feedback

Application
CV for Initial
Certification
Executive
Summary Report
Full Self
assessment
Referees

Not yet eligible

Eligibility check
Pass
Exam [!]

Feedback

Not yet competent
Pass

Path 1

Extended Interview [!]Path 2

Simulation/Role Based
Scenario [!](Regular) Interview [!]Feedback

Not yet competentFinal evaluation
Decision
Pass
Certificate

Archive[!] = If deemed not yet competent at the first attempt step can be repeated once.

Figure 3.3: Assessment path for IPMA Level C® 2016 International Project Management Association

14

Assessment Path for IPMA Level D ®

Feedback

Application
Knowledge Self
assessment

Not yet eligible

Eligibility check
Pass
Exam [!]

Feedback

Not yet competentFinal evaluation
Decision
Pass
Certificate

Archive[!] = If deemed not yet competent at the first attempt step can be repeated once.

Figure 3.4: Assessment path for IPMA Level D
3.1.2 Candidates are permitted to retake specified steps (!) of the assessment once ifthey are unsuccessful on their first attempt. For a candidate to be awarded an IPMA
certificate, they must have successfully completed each of the assessment steps within 18
months from the date of acceptance of their application.

3.2 Key certification steps
Application
3.2.1 Each CB provides an application form that includes all necessary personal details for
the CB to identify and process the applicant for suitability against the corresponding
certification level and domain applied for. As part of this, the applicant confirms that theyagree to and will comply with the conditions and obligations of the IPMA Certification
process including, but not limited to:•the publication of their name and certificate details on the CB and IPMA websites,
unless they express a wish not to do so in writing;•the release of their details to IPMA for audit purposes;•

ownership and use of the certificate;•

the CB’s certification procedures;•

the CB’s financial terms and conditions;•the CB’s code of professional conduct and code of ethics; and•the CB’s appeals process.

Self-assessment
3.2.2 The applicant’s self-assessment is used by the CB in the application phase to assess
their suitability for the qualification. It may also be used after the assessment has been
completed in order to provide comparative feedback to the candidate.
3.2.3 For levels A, B and C, the applicant completes a full self-assessment (knowledge,
skills and abilities) for all CEs in the level and domain applied for while considering the KCIs
in their assessment.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

15

3.2.4

For Level D, the applicant completes a self-assessment for knowledge for all CEs.

Curriculum Vitae (CV)3.2.5 For levels A, B and C, the applicant provides a summary of any projects,
programmes or portfolios they have managed or been involved in to meet the IPMA criteria.
Sufficient detail needs to be provided by the applicant to enable the assessors to assess
suitability of the IPMA level for which the applicant is applying. This, as a minimum, includes:•

the name and contact details of the applicant;•a career history including relevant:o project, programme and portfolio roles and positions held;o degrees and coursework from accredited institutions of higher learning;o professional certifications and qualifications;o project, programme and portfolio management training;o professional memberships; ando other professional development including awards, achievements
publications in project, programme or portfolio management.

•orAn overview of projects, programmes and portfolios which include:
o key deliverables, duration, budget and complexity of the projects,
programmes or portfolios; ando role, responsibility and extent of engagement of the applicant in each of the
projects, programmes or portfolios.

3.2.6 For re-certification at all levels, the certificate holder must provide a CV as above
plus sufficient evidence that they have undertaken a minimum of 35 hours’ of Continuing
Professional Development (CPD) per annum since their last certification. The CPD record issigned by the applicant and includes:•

name of development activity;•

description of the activity;•

dates undertaken and hours claimed;•

CEs covered by the activity; and•a summary statement reflecting on their learning from the CPD gained over theperiod and how they benefited.

Executive Summary Report
3.2.7 The Executive Summary Report can be used by assessors in preparation for theinterview. For levels A, B and C, the applicant submits an Executive Summary Report of a
maximum of 15 pages regarding their suitability for assessment based on the eligibility
criteria. The report includes:•organisation (company details, industry and project types, principal objectives of theorganisation and business unit in which the applicant works);•

a one-page summary for each of the project(s)/programme(s)/portfolio(s) with related
time schedules and phases and resources available to them;•

the role of the applicant (an organisation chart with their position identified, their areaof responsibility, an overview of the project management procedures they use, theirrelationship with internal and external stakeholders).

3.2.8

In addition:® 2016 International Project Management Association16

•for levels A and B: a description of how they have led each project, programme or
portfolio and how they meet the complexity criteria for the level being applied for,noting that these details will need to be used by the candidate as the basis for thereport; and•for Level C: a description of how they have managed each project and how theymeet the complexity criteria.

Referees
3.2.9 For levels A, B and C and re-certification, the applicant needs to provide names andcontact details of at least two referees to verify the applicant’s eligibility in relation to the leveland domain of certification for which they are applying.

Eligibility check3.2.10 As part of the 4-L-C System, each CB evaluates the applicant’s eligibility so that adecision on suitability can be taken. Based on the evidence provided and drawing on theexperience of assessors as necessary, the CB documents and informs the applicant of its
decision to accept or reject the application for certification. If the applicant is accepted asmeeting the eligibility criteria, they become a candidate.
3.2.11 Where an applicant does not meet the eligibility criteria, they will be advised by the
CB if it is possible to re-apply for certification at a lower level or what additional evidence
would be required to meet the eligibility criteria.

Exams
3.2.12 For levels B, C and D, each CB ensures that all exams are conducted in a controlledenvironment that is appropriately supervised with documented procedures that ensure theexam, its papers, questions and any exam-related material is securely controlled. This
includes the checking of candidate identities.
3.2.13 The Level B exam may be oral or written and may be decided by a CB for eachcertification cycle. The types of questions are open answer questions that allow candidates
to demonstrate application of knowledge at the required level only. A written exam lasts forthree hours. An oral exam lasts for ninety minutes.
3.2.14 The Level C exam is a written paper with open answer questions only. The questions
asked allow candidates to demonstrate application of knowledge at the required level only.
The Level C exam lasts for three hours.
3.2.15 The Level D exam is a written paper and is a mix of multiple choice and open answer
questions. Multiple choice questions have a minimum of four options to select from with one
right answer. There is no deduction for wrong answers and unanswered questions aretreated as wrong answers. The Level D exam lasts for three hours.
3.2.16 A recommendation is made by the assessors on pass or not yet competent after any
exam. If the candidate fails to achieve the pass mark by a margin of 5% or less, the paper is
re-marked independently by another assessor where marks are compared and a final
decision made.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

17

Report3.2.17 Candidates being assessed for levels A and B submit a detailed report covering theirproject(s), programme(s) or portfolio(s). These are related to the same ones described in thecandidate’s executive summary report in their application. The report describes theapplication of their leadership of others in applying the Competence Elements (CEs) for theappropriate role and level being assessed. There is a maximum of 25 pages for the text withan additional maximum of 15 pages for the appendices. The report is submitted in a suitabletypeface with a font size of 11 points.
3.2.18 The level A and B report provide the following information:•

Background: the candidate provides a detailed description of the project, programmeor portfolio role in context, key stakeholders, scope and key objectives, project,programme or portfolio organisation and the associated resources for which thecandidate was responsible (maximum three pages including graphics).

•

Project, programme or portfolio management challenges: The candidate provides an
overview of management challenges throughout the period of the project, programmeor portfolio role related to the CEs for the level and domain being applied for. As partof this, the report needs to address the candidate’s experiences in:o their management and leadership challenges with respect to others;o how these were acted upon and the results achieved; ando a reflection on the results and lessons learned.

Report evaluation
3.2.19 The CB assigns assessor(s) to evaluate the report against the requirements of thelevel and domain using the evidence provided by the candidate. A recommendation on
pass/not yet competent is given and recorded in the candidate’s file with the assessor(s)’notes. The candidate is judged as not yet competent if the report does not meet therequirements of the certification system for the level and role for which they applied.

Path-based simulations and interviews
3.2.20 After the report submission for level’s A and B, there are two possible paths that thecandidate may take (dependent on availability within the CB) – either a simulation/rolebased scenario and interview or an extended interview.
3.2.21 A simulation is a session where the candidate is presented with a situation and asked
to undertake tasks corresponding to the relevant role (project, programme or portfolio) andlevel (A, B or C) while being observed by the assessors. The primary use of simulations is toassess personal competences in an environment where interaction occurs with others. An
assessor may choose specific tasks for each candidate, to cover areas where they havegiven insufficient evidence earlier in the process and based on previously assessed
evidence as necessary. The assessment of the candidate is made on an individual basis andis not based on the performance of the group. Assessors have a minimum of thirty minutes
observation/contact time per candidate.
3.2.22 The purpose of the interviews is to assess practice and perspective competences.
Interviews are undertaken by two assessors, who identify which specific CEs and KCIs areto be assessed for each candidate and ask questions they have previously prepared related
to materials provided. Answers are recorded as part of the evidence capture.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

18

Assessors’ interview time percandidate

Level A

Level B

Level C

Duration

90 mins

90 mins

60 mins

Table 2: Regular interview durations
3.2.23 Where a simulation is not available, an extended interview is undertaken. To ensure
equality, contact time is extended in order to provide opportunity to cover the specific CEs
and KCIs that are to be assessed for each candidate.

Assessors interview time per candidate

Level A

Level B

Level C

Duration

120 mins

120 mins

90 mins

Table 3:. Extended interview durations

Final evaluation, decision and certification
3.2.24 During the final evaluation, the assessor(s) determine if the candidate hassatisfactorily met all required criteria for the IPMA level and domain being applied for. The
lead assessor then forwards the final evaluation to the CB for ratification and final decision.
The CB makes the decision as to whether the candidate has passed or is not yet competent
based upon the recommendation of the assessors after checking that all procedures havebeen followed and the documentation is complete.
3.2.25 Certificate information is published on the IPMA website as public information, unlessthe candidate objects in writing to the CB. Certificates are valid for five years after which thecertificate holder may apply for re-certification at the same level or certification at a new levelwith appropriate evidence.

Feedback
3.2.26 In cases where an applicant is not accepted as a candidate, or a candidate fails theinitial certification process, they are informed in writing about the reasons for the decision by
the CB. As part of the continuous improvement process, applicants and candidates may also
be asked to complete a feedback questionnaire about their experiences concerning thecertification process. This feedback is not used as part of the candidate assessment or
decision-making process.

Archiving
3.2.27 The CB ensures that all records are properly controlled and archived for a minimumof six years.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

19

Chapter 4
4.1 Re-certification
4.1.1 Re-certification is due five years after initial certification for all levels and domains. It is
the responsibility of the certificate holder to initiate the re-certification process throughapplication up to a maximum of six months from their certificate expiry date. An extension
may be provided by the IPMA Certification Body (CB) up to 12 months from the certificate
expiry date, with justification.
Application
CV forRe-certification(Full) Self
assessment
Structured
Evidence
Referees

Re-certification for all IPMA Levels

Feedback

Not eligible

Eligibility check

In case of doubt
Interview

Feedback

Not competentFinal evaluation
Decision
Pass
Certificate

Archive

Figure 4.1:. Re-certification path for all IPMA levels
4.1.2 The requirements for the different levels on re-certification are described in the tablebelow:

Level A

Domainrelated
experience
required by
the applicant

Level B

Level C

Level D

Evidence of minimum 30 months of practical experience
over five-year period

Not applicableComplexity

Not applicable

Leadership of others

Management ofothersNot applicable

Minimum of 35 hours’ evidence of CPD per annum (175 hours total) since
the last (re-)certification
Table 4: Re-certification criteria for levels A, B, C and D® 2016 International Project Management Association

20

4.1.3 Having evaluated the applicant’s documentation for suitability, the CB may
consider it necessary undertake an interview in order to follow up on the evidence
provided and may ask the applicant to present additional evidence at that interview.
A pass or not competent decision for the level and domain applied for is madeagainst this additional evidence in the final evaluation.

Re-certification interview
4.1.4 This applies where a re-certification interview is required in case of doubt. To
contextualise the applicant’s claim of competence and professional development, theapplicant needs to prepare and deliver a 10-minute maximum presentation at the beginningof the re-certification interview. A re-certification interview lasts no more than one hour intotal.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

21

Chapter 5
5.1 Complaints and appeals
5.1.1 Each IPMA Certification Body (CB) publishes its process to deal with complaints andappeals in a fair, impartial, confidential and constructive manner.
5.1.2 The process ensures that all complaints and appeals are handled and processed
within a three-month period from the date of receiving a complaint or appeal in writing.
Applicants and candidates may file an appeal in writing with the CB within 30 days from theircertification decision. If the individual wishes to make a complaint about the CB, it should besent to IPMA through the IPMA website for the attention of the IPMA Certification andValidation Management Board.

® 2016 International Project Management Association

22

The International Project Management Association
International Certification Regulations (Public)
The profession of project management is increasing globally and there is a strong
demand for suitability individuals leading projects, programmes and portofolios.
Individuals must be able to demonstrate that they have achieved a certain level ofprofessionalism that meets international standards in order to complete theirassignments and progress in their careers. The IPMA International Certification
Regulations (IPMA ICR) provides a mechanism by which individuals are assessed by
Certification Bodies globally using the IPMA four-level certification (IPM 4-L-C) system.
This document is public facing and summarises how the IPMA competence assessment
might impact them – for individuals wishing to understand the criteria of an assessment
and how to gather evidence; for companies wishing to implement career paths in theirorganisation and how to develop individuals; and for globalorganisations needing toestablish a holistic assessment process for the certification of their project management
community and identify skills in its community of practice. The IPMA ICR ensures that
Certification Bodies act transparently and deliver fair, valid and reliable assessments ofindividuals that are based on current, sufficient and authentic evidence from theirapplicants and candidates. The IPMA ICR (Public) for the Assessment of Individuals in
Project, Programme and Portfolio Management – delivered locally, recognised globally.

www.ipma.wold