Secret Affairs: Franklin Roosevelt, Cordell Hull, and Sumner Welles
Irwin Gellman
The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995
Reviewed by Tadashi Hama
“You know I am a juggler, and I never let my right hand know what my left hand does… I
may be entirely inconsistent, and furthermore I am perfectly willing to mislead and tell
untruths if it will help win the war.”-- President Franklin Roosevelt to Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau, 1942.
Author and independent historian Irwin Gellman’s biography of three key American
political leaders before and during World War II reads like a novel. Quotes from theprotagonists (President Franklin Roosevelt, Secretary of State Cordell Hull andUndersecretary of State Sumner Wells) as well their allies and detractors fill the entire book.
Gellman states early on: “Novelists have no trouble constructing their make believe
schemes because plot and character and development may be conveniently intertwined as
the need arises.” On reflection, the narration may have been a little too “convenientlyintertwined”, with key events missing as the need arose.
Life to most is generally unremarkable, interactions between others as solitary events.
By contrast, Gellman’s tale is a Netflix drama waiting to be written: a confluence ofRoosevelt, the master architect of the war against Japan and Germany and an Americacentric new world order, Hull, his loyal yet feckless Secretary of State and his a closet
homosexual underling, Welles, whom he despises, nonetheless advises the President on
foreign policy.
The lack of attention to crucial details makes the book’s storyline too “convenient”. We are
all told that Roosevelt had no hand--at all--in fomenting the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor and that Roosevelt was blissfully unaware of Japan’s machinations. Gellman
faithfully follows orthodoxy, dismissing any suggestion that Roosevelt knew of animpending Japanese attack on America as “erroneous” and “simplistic”. Gellman further
muddies the waters when he suggests that Roosevelt was more interested in Hitler andMussolini, thus “ignoring” the Pacific and when discussion was raised with Roosevelt,
these were merely “distractions” from the “larger European puzzle.”
By 1940, the US was able to read Japan’s encrypted diplomatic messages. Thus,
Commander-in-Chief Roosevelt knew Japan’s overseas strategy. Whether this knowledge
shaped his strategy to enter into the European conflict on the side of Briatain, we are nottold at all. And this is not the only omission.
1We could have learned:
Why Roosevelt, initially supportive, was ultimately dismissive of an initiative to host asummit between himself and Prime Minister Konoye Fumimaro to reconcile differences
between the US and Japan in mid-1941;
Why Roosevelt sent a letter to Emperor Showa on the eve of Pearl Harbor, chiding Japan ofits “aggression”;
What Roosevelt meant with his comment, of maneuvering “them [the Japanese] into theposition to fire the first shot” at his War Cabinet meeting of November 25, 1941;
Of his reaction (“This means war!”), upon reading the decrypted Japanese cable rejecting
further negotiations with the U.S. on December 6, 1941.
The current book missed a grand opportunity in explaining Roosevelt’s single-mindedness
in dragging America into a war no one, neither the American public nor the Japanese,wanted. Long before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt allowed American
military pilots to fight for the Republic of China against Japan—in violation of American
neutrality.
Whether the gaps were deliberate or not is something only the author of the current bookcan address.
Omissions and gaps could work the other way as well: perhaps there was absolutely
nothing at all. For example, we read that Roosevelt “considered an armed response” uponhearing of the sinking of the USS Panay on December 12, 1937, just off Nanking, byJapanese forces, which was in the midst of a conflict against the Republic of China. Thematter was eventually settled with a formal Japanese apology and compensation. While thePanay was under attack, Japanese ground troops were on the verge of capturing Nanking,the capital of the Republic of China. The book relates nothing, from either Roosevelt or
Hull, on Japan’s “Rape of Nanking”. When one considers Roosevelt’s pro-China
upbringing, one has to wonder why he said nothing of a so-called “Rape of Nanking”. One
can draw his own conclusion—either the Roosevelt administration thought nothing of the“Rape of Nanking” or, more likely, there was no “Rape of Nanking”.
Gellman claims that Roosevelt had “no interest” in Asia and yet he favored “closer contactswith China”, without further explanation. In fact, one will need to read elsewhere tounderstand Roosevelt’s high regard of China and his visceral dislike of Japan and theJapanese. For example, we learn elsewhere that Roosevelt inherited a love of China throughthe Delano side of his family.1 He listened with rapt attention to Grandfather’s andMother’s stories of their time in “Old China”. We also learn elsewhere that Roosevelt
1Bradley, J. (2015). The China Mirage. NY, NY: Little, Brown and Company.

2

hoped to cure the Japanese race of their “inherent wickedness” by “miscegenation”.2
However, to Roosevelt, “A Japanese-European crossing … was “thoroughly bad.”” Hisview mirrored that of Professor Ales Hrdlicka of the Smithsonian Institution, who believed
the Japanese were “nefarious” because they were “less developed”. Roosevelt consulted
Hrdlicka on such matters.
Gellman does allow a few of Roosevelt’s failings, such as his long standing extramarital
affair with Lucy Mercer, his wife Eleanor’s private secretary. Once Eleanor found out about
the affair, while Franklin was Assistant Secretary of the Navy, he was made to promise tonever see her again. However, he secretly met Lucy a number of times during his finalyears in the White House. She was present (and quickly shuttled out) when Roosevelt diedat Warm Springs, GA. While seeing nothing wrong with keeping a mistress, he was“offended” with Eleanor’s own affair with a “youthful” Joseph Lash, a socialist agitator(think Antifa).3
Roosevelt’s wartime death raises an interesting observation—Gellman states that“condolences poured in from around the globe”. Not stated in the book, but even Japan sentcondolences: “A Tokyo domestic broadcast in the Japanese language said, “We indeed
grieve to learn of the death of President Roosevelt. We didn’t expect that he could passaway when the whole world is in such a state of chaos…”4 Certainly, this display ofJapanese respect at a time of American morning, belies the standard Western wartime
propaganda that characterizes the Japanese as sub-humans. By contrast, we do not hear in
the current book of Roosevelt’s denouncement of sending Japanese body parts to the US astrophies.
Roosevelt set foreign policy and readers will conclude that Hull was nothing more than thePresident’s messenger. Based on the book, one’s impression would be entirely correct—
Hull had little to do with events that led to war with Japan. In fact, the infamous “Hullnote”, a list of American demands for continued peace with Japan, was written by Soviet
mole Harry Dexter White, an official in the Treasury Department. White even obtained
approval of the memo from his superior, Secretary Morgenthau, who sent it to Roosevelt.5Unlike other well-heeled members of Roosevelt’s clique, Tennessean Hull did not attend anelite private school or graduate from an Ivy League college. We learn of his diagnosis oftuberculosis (or possibly sarcoidosis, a chronic lung disease), which necessitated frequent
2Janssens, R.V.A. (1995). What Future for Japan? Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

3

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1983/12/12/secret-hoover-files-show-misuse-offbi/6ba74dc7-a6b7-447b-95a1-ea2ff28ecacc/
4Life, April 23, 1945.

5Koster, J. (2012). Operation Snow. Washington, DC: Regnery.

3and long absences from his job. (While out of the office, Undersecretary Wells took overday to day operations of the State Department.) The book points out that Hull’sappointment to head the State Department was a merely a sop to the politically powerfulsouthern Democrats, who Roosevelt needed to retain his grip on the White House. In fact,
Hull was not thinking about staying at the State Department as he hoped to run for
President in 1940, as Roosevelt’s chosen successor. However, Hull never received
Roosevelt’s blessing as Roosevelt deceived to run for a third term. Until the end of his life,
Hull seethed in silence.
The final character in Gellman’s tale is Welles, a closeted homosexual. He was viewed at
the time as a security risk because of his sexual preference. Roosevelt eventually found out
about Welles after asking J. Edger Hoover, Director of the FBI, to investigate. Despiteabhorring homosexuality, Roosevelt did nothing and left Secretary Hull to deal with Welles.
Hull came to despise Welles, primarily because he spoke directly to Roosevelt concerning
policy, bypassing Hull. Hull was not above leaking embarrassing information to lackeys inorder to Welles to resign. Despite the (apparent) fact that Welles was superior to Hull as anadministrator, Welles eventually resigned in 1943.
If nothing else, after reading the current book, one will need to reflect on the mental
stability and moral fortitude of those Americans who held the power of life and death
during a crucial period in history.

4