The Base National Korean Mind is Utterly
Incomprehensible to the Japanese
BY Kou Bunyu(Ga0 Wen-xiong), critic
Falsehood, fraud, mutual mistrust, empty arguments, ignorance, humiliation,
cowardliness—these are the true faces of the great Korean people with a history that isfive thousand years old.
Nationality Painted with Betrayal and Mistrust
The Republic of Korea’s President Lee Myung-bak’s landing on Takeshima Island andutterly thoughtless comment concerning the Japanese Emperor instantly fueled anger
and protests throughout Japan. There is the sense of resignation, rather than a mere
rising of anti-Korean sentiment, that is beginning to settle among the Japanese people
that Korea is no longer a proper nation.
In spite of the fact that Japan and Korea concluded a Basic Treaty after World WarⅡ,
one Korean President after another still obstinately demands that Japan should
apologize and show regret. While Japan has accepted such Korean claims andrepeatedly made such acceptance clear in writing—and has virtually made apologizing
a ritual—Korean anti-Japanese sentiment has neither ceased nor calmed down.
When President Kim Dae-jung and Roh Tae-woo’s two-generation-long, ten-year
pro-Chinese,

pro-North

Korean,anti-Japaneseandanti-American

left-wing

administrations changed to that of business-minded Lee Myung-bak, who clearlypromised to end the troublesome Korean-Japanese relationship of the past, Japan, withmuch optimism, also expected a better and normalized relationship between the twocountries. However, decent Japanese with common sense were utterly shocked by thesudden, drastic change in attitude and abnormal behaviors displayed by President Lee
Myung-bak since this August, and cannot help but feel that “We have been betrayedagain.” “You too, Lee Myung-bak!”—Japan’s mistrust against Korea continues to pile
up all the more.
President Lee Myung-bak’s eccentric actions immediately reminded me of a
description in the book entitled Korean Way (originally titled History of Koryo ) written
by French Father Claude-Charles Dallet. Dallet writes, “Conspiracy devised by 50
people will be revealed by 49 people, which indicates the Korean nationality of mistrustand betrayal.”
The “foreign incidents” that occurred twice are well-known events in Korean history.

1

Korea fought against the Manchu-Mongolian Eight Banner Army and was defeated in
the battle, and then made to bear the humiliation of being forced to build the “TriumphArch,” the “Reception Hall” and the Statue of Admiration for China. But these can betraced back to the second king of the Later Jin Dynasty Khan Hong Taiji who simply
avenged the mistreatment and distrust inflicted upon his people by Korea. The “Foreign
incidents” should not be seen as a history of aggression on the Peninsula by the
Manchu-Mongolian Eight Flag Army, but rather as historical events signifying the
Korean national behavior of betrayal and mistrust.
After the War, the entire Korean Peninsula (both North and South) totally abolishedthe use of difficult Chinese characters which were used only by a very small populationof elites, and made Hangul the national alphabet, which proved to be essential tobuilding a nation. At that time, even China itself tried to simplify the Chinesecharacters and to eventually Latinize the characters. Even the great author Lu Xun
wrote in his will: Unless Chinese characters are abolished, China will be ruined.
Change or transition in the means of communication is often seen throughout humanhistory and is not exclusive to the modern and contemporary eras.
As a result, however, the so-called Hangul generation, after the abolishment ofChinese characters, had no means of studying the true history of their own country andas a consequence the Korean people knew only of their national history thoughfabrication. In the Five Thousand Year History of Korea, except for the histories of theKokuryo and Bohai, very few true descriptions can be seen and Pak Chong-hui is the
only true historical figure. That is how I see the Republic of Korea from a neutral pointof view.
Korea during 36 Years under the Japanese Imperialist Regime Was an Ultra-stable
SocietyPresident Lee Myung-bak’s comment “If the Japanese Emperor wants to visit South
Korea, he should first apologize for the victims of the independence movements” may bepermissible in Korea, but not in any other place on earth. Not only will Korean intellect
but also its national dignity will be severely questioned.
Ever since the Seoul Olympics, Korea continues to demand that the JapaneseEmperor visit Korea, as if it were Japan’s obligation. On the contrary, Japan neverproposed an Imperial visit. Moreover, now that the “victims of the independence
movement” have been mentioned, let me add the fact that, from volunteer soldiers toanti-Japanese guerrillas, there were more victims of the power struggles within theorganizations than those who were judged and punished by the law set-up after the2Japanese-Korean Federation. Who killed Yo Un-hyung, Song Jin-man and Kim Gu, who
acted most heroically as leaders of the anti-Japanese and “resist Japan” independence
movements?

I suspect that most independence activists were killed by their own

comrades or political enemies.
After the War, Korea still insists on “overcoming” Japan, repeats such anti-Japanesemantra as “the seven deprivations caused by the 36-year-long Japanese Imperialist
regime,” referring to the seven items of sovereignty, king, land, surnames, human life,
national language and resources, and further adds accusations of forced abduction andcomfort women. These assertions serve as leverage in their nation-building. The Islandof Takeshima was designated as Korean territory after the Syngman Rhee Line was
set-up after the war.
Ever since the dawn of the era of nation-states, all peoples or nations have aspired to
become big and powerful. Not only Great Britain and France, but also the dual
monarchy of Austria-Hungary, Czechoslovakia and what later became Yugoslavia werefederal republics headed by similar leaders (but mostly monarchs). The book entitled

Concept of Great East Federal Republic by Tarui Tokichi, which was published several
years after the publication of Out of Asia by Fukuzawa Yukichi, maintains that thethree nations of Japan, Korea and China felt no sense of awkwardness when they werecalled “federal republics” in terms of race, territory, shared culture and customs. The
Japanese-Korean Federation was realized through overcoming conflicting opinions on
both sides, and it is a false accusation that the federation was a product of forced,
unilateral action by Japan. The Japanese-Korean Federation was jointly celebrated by
the Powers as a foundation for eternal peace in East Asia, and even the Qing Dynasty
and Russia, which held conflicting interests, did not disagree.
In reality, in fact, far from suffering the “seven deprivations,” which Korea loudly
claims during the post-war years, both population and food production doubled, andsovereignty was further expanded. In terms of historical facts, the seven “deprivations”
should instead be referred to as the “seven benefits” or “seven offerings”.
After President Rhee Syngman onward, a Korean political rule or destiny was for the
emerging president to purge his predecessor. However, this was not a practice limited tothe post-war years. From the House of Yi to the noble class of Yangbang, peer struggles
became a special product and chronic disease of Korea. Not only within the five hundredyears of the Yi Dynasty, but also during the Koryo Dynasty--even dating back to thenation’s founding by King Dangun--violent peer struggle was the doomed destiny of thePeninsula.
Why, then, did Korea during the Imperial Japanese era become a highly stable society,3unprecedented in Korean history? The only reason for this was that the traditional
peer struggles were eliminated from the Peninsula and changed into outside, off-stage
fights. In the post-war years, the Korean tradition of peer struggle returned. The
Hangul generation, in accounting for their modern and contemporary history, should
know these basic facts.
Mentality Inclined to Link Everything to “Forced Abduction”
It is becoming more and more clear that forced abductions and comfort women were
never real issues. Nevertheless, Korea is still using them as perfect tools forblackmailing and extortion—Koreans even built a bronze statue of a comfort woman tohonor and worship.
Quite understandably, though, there may be some reason for their fussing overlinking everything to forced abduction, judging from their history and nationality.
There were following historical facts: forced abductions of people sent from Kokuryo andPaekche by the Tang Army and of Koryo people by the Mongolian Army. It was also ahistorical fact that the Manchu-Mongolian Eight Flag Army took half the Korean
population to the north. It is also a fact that kidnapping is a habit that is a part of the
traditional culture of the Peninsula. The abduction incidents committed by North Korea
can be said to be examples of that habit, too.
Japanese and Korean media once sensationally reported that “Eight thousand
Taiwanese boys were abducted to Japan,” but the news turned out to be a bogus “great
discovery” by the Korean media and Japanese progressive scholars. During the PacificWar, Taiwanese boy workers, after passing a strict academic examination and physicalcheck-up, and with the approval from the school principal and their parents, were
eventually sent to Japan proper to engage in the production of Raiden (ThunderFighters) fighter planes, which were comparable to Zero fighter planes.
The “forced abduction” of Korean people is a fabricated story and the fact is that theJapanese Government actually limited the number of Koreans entering Japan proper,
and Koreans held rallies to protest the limitation. Regarding the entry of Japan properby Taiwanese people, there was very severe competition in the form of examinations,and judging from the situation, common sense tells us that it would have been most
unfeasible to forcibly abduct Koreans. Even today, it is a big headache for the Japanese
Government to deal with illegals entering from the Peninsula.
As for the so-called comfort women, except for a few Japanese, like ex-foreign
minister Kono Yohei, whom the Koreans favorably refer to as a “conscientious
Japanese,” Governor Ishihara Shintaro of Tokyo and Mayor Hashimoto Toru of Osaka,

4

for example, firmly deny the accusation, maintaining that there is no evidence oforganized and forced prostitution by the Japanese. That is the common belief among theJapanese as well.
In the first place, the Korean Peninsula has been the biggest supplier of prostitutes in
Asia. At present, there are one hundred thousand Korean prostitutes working invarious places around the world, and about half of them are engaged in Japan. Judging
from the history of prostitution of the Peninsula, the managing and catering of
prostitutes is equivalent to the “comfort women” situation and had raised no moral or
ethical concerns before some progressive (actually left wing) Japanese people criticizedPresident Park for his policy of state-run prostitution and prostitution tourism as anational business in the seventies. During the Koryo Era, it was a historical fact thatthe government set up an office for classifying married women, widows and virgins, andsold the data to the Mongolian Government. It is a far cry from the fact that once
Toyotomi Hideyoshi became furious after learning that Japanese women were sold to
Portugal as slaves that he immediately issued an order expelling the visiting
missionary fathers.
Seen by neutral eyes of a Taiwanese, up until the time immediately after the War,
prostitutes in Taiwan were mostly Korean. The first human exchange between Taiwan
and Korea was among the prostitutes working at coal mines. In times of famine, girls
were sold at the price of one-sho (1.8 liters) of rice a head, and during the Imperial
Japanese regime, the price was 30 yen, equivalent to two months salary of a state
official, through Chinese merchants.

In India, female mediums are more highly

honored than a king, while the women’s status is entirely different in a Confucian state.
The sad and tragic history of the poor Koreans of the past is too premature to be told toyoung Japanese junior high school students. Instead of trying to glorify the past, Korea
should know about its own social manners and customs to some extent.
Bullying of the Weak and Theft at a Fire
I understand that Japanese people are fed up with the anti-Japanese, “overcome
Japan” campaigns repeatedly staged by Koreans and may sometimes be at a loss on how
to cope with them. Why don’t you change the way you see the Koreans a little bit? On
the contrary, the anti-Japan fuss among Great China and Small China can serve as agood stimulus for post-war Japanese to ask themselves once again, “What is a state andwhat is a nation?” and may be a catalyst for true self-reflection and awakening. Thus,
you may well be grateful for the anti-Japanese movement. You should learn from
Roman history, wherein Rome deteriorated and collapsed into self-debasement after it

5had defeated and ruined its eternal enemy Carthage.
At the least, since the Great Korean Empire at the end of the Yi Dynasty, Korea has
become a country too dependent on Japan to live on its own. The Koreans may voice“anti-Japan” and “overcome Japan” hostility, but deep inside they indulge in Japaneseleniency. Korea also holds a grudge towards China, which had held hegemony over
Korea for one thousand years. However, with China, the idea of Hanfeizi is more
dominant than that of The Prince by Machiavelli.
The Chinese have a secret knack of completely dominating its counterpart so that thelatter cannot fight back. Holding a grudge is useless. On the other hand, thecompassionate Japanese can hardly be so ruthless and harsh. That is the difference.
The true character of the Koreans is to obediently follow the strongest, not only inpolitics, but in every phase of life. As a reverse of humiliating obedience in front of thestrong, they tend to act ruthlessly toward the weak and take advantage of them, similar
to looters during a fire. Who knows of the Korean people’s behaviors immediately after
the end of the War in the devastatingly scorched Japanese homeland?
“We were invaded a thousand times and every time we fought back and expelled theinvaders,” is the proud story of their country among the Hangul generation. Pitifully,
though, there is hardly any historical fact that supports this assertion. When invaded
from the north, influential people in northern Korea readily offered the land to theinvaders and attacked southern Korea, even willingly leading the invaders. Even
during the Japanese attack from the sea, people in the lower classes rose in upheaval,
burned the royal palace, captured the escaping prince and rendered him to theJapanese army. This story of battle is revealed in the history of Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s
Korean campaign.
Both domestically and overseas, the Korean national behavior of playing up to thestrong while bullying the weak and of looting during a calamity remains the same.
During the Yi Dynasty, Korea served Master Ming and bullied the Manchurians. Whenthe Manchurians fought back, they promptly changed their vehicle from cattle to horses
and engaged in a great massacre of the Ming people in front of the Manchu-Mongolian
Eight Flag Army. The first overseas campaign, of which the Koreans boast, was nothing
more than the battering of Viet-cong guerrillas, Koreans merely acting as asses covered
lion’s skin.
In the first place, Taiwan and Korea were comrades in the fight against Communism.
Foreign aid that enabled the realization of the “Miracle of Hang River” also came ingreat amount from Taiwan, besides from Japan. But Korea, after having changed theirstanding from pro-Taiwan to pro-China, from cattle to horses, beat and bullied

6

Taiwanese people in extremely harsh and cold-blooded ways. Taiwanese-Chinesemerchants in Korea are Shantung people. The Chinese merchants were most severely
oppressed and their population was reportedly reduced to one-tenth of its original size
and the survivors were scattered to Taiwan and other countries outside of thePeninsula.
It was not, however, Taiwan’s nature to accept such horrible bullying without fighting
back. While on the occasion of the riot in Los Angeles, black Americans only attacked
Korean-owned stores, in Taiwan counter-actions ranged from cancellation of airplanes
mutually commuting between the two countries, city councils in Kaohsiung and Tainan
unanimously passed a resolution to completely banning exchanges between their sistercities, and also among the private sectors, a passenger carelessly speaking Korean wasforced out of the taxi, barbecue shops run by Korean owners were forced to go nearly outof business.
Japan, so plagued with Korean bullying as to have had a bronze statue of a “saintcomfort woman” built right in front of the Japanese Embassy in Seoul, can yet stay socool and nonchalant in a truly grown-up manner. I cannot help but envy the Japanese
for their maturity.
Hyper-Inner-Depth Psychology that Breeds Anti-Japanese sentimentThis author has written several books on the Korean people’s “anti-Japan” stancesince the nineties. One of them is Distorted Korean General Government Office (Kappa
Books). I have tried to widely analyze the reasons why Koreans are anti-Japan.
As far as the recent anti-Japanese actions are concerned, I think that they will not soeasily cease in a short period of time. That is because the real reason for the problem
lies in the Koreans, rather than in the Japanese people.
The point is that “professional” anti-Japanese activists are not of the “colonial-days
generation” who had experienced the 36 years of the Imperial Japanese regime, but
mostly of the “Hangul generation,” who actually do not know much about Japan.
The “Colonial-days generation,” who had been made subjects of the Japanese Emperor,
may cry “stop Japan” with the Hangul generation in public, but they never mention
anti-Japanese sentiment in private. The Hangul generation despise this Japano-phile
generation so much that they even say, “As long as the old generation does not die out,
Korea will never be able to celebrate its national glory,” and so easily sever their ties tothe preceding generation.
As to the reasons for the Korean anti-Japanese stance, there have been various
analyses, ranging from the breeding of nationalism to the culture of grudge. The

7

anti-Japanese stance taken by the people of Great China (China) and by the people of
Small China (Korea) may in part come from a common Chinese character, but in somepart may be quite different, reflecting different historical paths.
In Korea, which is without a religious centric force inherent in Islam and Judaism,
the people can seek their identity only through sensational encouragement. This is thevery Achilles’ heel of the Korean people, who boast of a “great Korean people with afive-thousand year history.”
Having no centering force like religion or a monarchy, Korea has no way of venting
their humiliation and a very complicated psychology of having constantly been
threatened by the Chinese Empire by land and the Imperial Japanese control of theseas. Unless their dreams of “becoming the most brilliant people in the entire world”
and “making the 21st century the Korean century” are realized, both the anti-Chinese
and the anti-Japanese and counter-Japanese fuss will never cease.
It is essential to probe the Korean mentality at a comparative cultural level to findout the true reason for Korean anti-Japan feelings--especially from the points of Koreannationality and its language structure.
The father of modern Korean literature, Lee Guang-Su points out many aspects of
Korean nationality: false words, fraud, mutual mistrust, flowery words, empty
arguments and opinions, flattery and truckling, false obedience, adaptation to themajority, shamelessness, abuse, servility, cowardliness, indecision and unsocial
selfishness. Ex-president Park Chung-hee picked up factional strife and currying favorwith the strong as negative legacies from a criminal national history and the history of
the Yi Dynasty. Of course, customs, habits and nationality change as ages change. In his
book The Structure of the Korean People’s Mind and Consciousness, Yun Dae-lin’s
remarks on the Korean language include, “It is unfit for scientific descriptions,” “It isunable to comprehend matters objectively and to focus on the subject,” and “It lacks
spirit to see things rationally.”
I feel that we need to find out the true reasons behind Korean anti-Japanesesentiment, with the help of Freud’s psychoanalysis and Jung’s hyper-inner-depth
psychology, as well as the Buddhist idea of alaya-vijnana, master of everything in theuniverse.

About the author, Mr. Kou Bunyu (Gao Wen-xiong)
Born in 1938 in Kaohsiung Prefecture, Taiwan, Mr. Kou graduated from theCommercial Department of Waseda University and completed a Masters’ course at Meiji

8

University Graduate School. He was awarded the Wufu Cultural Critic Award and the
Taiwan Pen Club Award in 1994.
Among Mr. Kou’s many books are Japanese Legacy Unknown to the Japanese andKorea Was Made by Japan. His latest book is Why Are the Japanese so Different fromthe Chinese and the Koreans?

*First published in monthly magazine Seiron, December, 2012 issue.

9