The Truth about Comfort Women

A "comfort girl" is nothing more than a prostitute.
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF WAR INFORMATION
Japanese Prisoner of War Interrogation Report No. 49.

Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact
1

The Truth about Comfort Women
Published by the Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact
Shin SakumaBldg., 3F, 2-13-14, Nishi Shimbashi,
Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0003

JAPAN

moteki@sdh-fact.com
Copyright ©2014 by the Society for the Dissemination ofHistorical Fact.
All rights reserved, including the rightof reproduction in whole

or in part, in any form.
Printed in Japan.
Note:Japanese, Chinese and Korean personal names have been
rendered surname first, in accordance with the customs in thosecountries.

2

Content

Preface …

4

1. “Fabricating Historical Facts” by Henry Scott
Stokes…

5

2. “The Comfort -Women Issue: An
Perspective by Tony Marano … 13
3. “Comfort Women in Korea”
17

Ignoredby KASE Hideaki…

4. “Lies Inscribed on the Stone Monument in Glendale
and the Comfort Women Controversy” by
MOTEKI Hiromichi … 213

Preface
The so-called “comfort women” controversy is humiliating, notonly to Japan and the Japanese people but also to Korea and the
Korean people.
If the outrageous accusations against Japan were true, theywould show the Japanese people in an extremely bad light. But at
the same time, the accusations would also greatly insult the
Korean people. For even though there were supposedly some
200,000 Korean girls snatched from their homes, there were no
instances of resistance, to say nothing of revolt, in Korea. Would
not this make the Korean people look bad? Would we have everencountered such cowards at any other time in world history?
Moreover, no Korean government made any mention of thisissue during a period of fourteen years of negotiations for the 1965
Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and Korea. Isn’t this fact
an unpardonable sin by the Korean government if the accusedoutrageous human-right violations really took place?
The authors have been appealing to the world through thewebsite of The Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact
(http://www.sdh-fact.com) saying that the stories currently
circulating about comfort women are lies and fabrications. On thatsite you can find three books, including Behind the Comfort
Women Controversy: How Lies Became Truth by Professor
Nishioka Tsutomu of Tokyo Christian University, and more thanten essays.
The booklet you are reading now contains four essays written
by an English reporter, an American critic and two Japanesewriters. We hope it will help unprejudiced, open-minded readers
throughout the world to learn the truth about the comfort womenissue.

4

Fabricating Historical Facts
By Henry Scott Stokes, former Tokyo Bureau Chief of

The New York Times
The so-called “Nanking Massacre” was initially a propaganda
tool of the KMT Chinese government in 1937. It was later
expanded by the International Military Tribunal for the Far East
held in the latter half of the 1940s. Fabrication of history was theninherited by the Japanese media – NHK, the Asahi Shimbun, etc.
-- and was recorded in school textbooks as truth in the 1980s. As aresult, it has reverberated in China. The “Nanking Massacre” – afabricated history – is currently utilized as a diplomatic andpolitical tool by the Communist government. This is the historicalanatomy of the “Nanking Massacre” propaganda. What, then,happened to the “comfort women” issue? The anatomy looks
somewhat similar.
The New York Times had its office in the Asahi Shimbun head
office in Yurakucho, so I was personally acquainted with the Asahi
Shimbun reporter, Fukashiro Junro, who wrote the newspaper’s
daily column entitled “Tensei Jingo” or “Vox Populi, Vox Dei.”
Fukashiro strongly insisted, repeatedly, that I write about
Mishima Yukio. He even came all the way to Zurich to encourageme when I was writing my book The Life and Death of Yukio
Mishima. Without his psychological support, I would have neverbeen able to write about Mishima Yukio.
Did Fukashiro mention anything about the comfort women or
the “sexual slavery” of the Imperial Japanese Army? I do not think
so. At least, it was just not the issue and I don’t have any
recollection whatsoever. I must say that the “comfort women”
fandango is a phenomenon which came into light after I left The
New York Times.
In the past, Koreans respected the Japanese
When I served as a Tokyo Bureau Chief for The Times of
London and The New York Times, I was covering Korean affairs in5

addition to my responsibility that stretched to all of South East
Asia. The impression I had at that time about Korean people ingeneral was that they respected Japan and the Japanese people.
Japan annexed Korea in 1910, five years after Japan’s victoryin the Russo-Japanese War. In order to modernize Korea, theamount of effort and expenditure Japan had to set aside wasreally enormous, establishing medical, police and military systems,
building the foundation of today’s Korean society. My
understanding is the Korean people accepted such Japaneseefforts. Japanese colonial rule was different from western colonial
rule, which was based on racial supremacy, of white people against
colored people. Korean people were treated, under the Japaneserule, as if they were the same people, the same race. The Japanese
race and Korean race were treated equally and Koreans weretreated as Japanese nationals. By and large the Japanese andKoreans helped each other and they both seemed to like eachother.
When I was reporting on South Korea, almost all Korean
people I met respected Japan. Business owners looked to Japan as
their model. Lee Kun-hee, the Chairman of Samsung Group, was
one of them. Chairman Lee and I are friends of over forty years.
He is about my age. Lee and his father led the business world ofSouth Korea. Both of them were graduates of Japan’s Waseda
University. I would say almost all top leaders of the South Koreanbusiness community adored Japan.
A best-selling author and a professor at Takushoku University
in Japan, Oh Seon-hwa, provides us with insightful views. In her
book entitled, Why There Is No Future for Anti-Japanese Korea,
she explains the background of the Korean people’s recent
anti-Japanese mood. According to her, those who experienced
Japanese rule before and during WWII were much more
empathetic toward Japan and the Japanese. They were not as
critical of Japan, the Japanese and their rule of the Korean
Peninsula. Such an observation is the same as mine.
Oh presents, based on her interviews of those Koreans who
experienced Japanese rule during pre-war and wartime Korea, a
new look at Japan’s Imperial rule in the Korean Peninsula.
According to Oh, there are four major features of Japanese6

colonial rule: (1) no policy that aimed to benefit Japan by plunder
was implemented; (2) military suppression was not used at all to
execute governing policies; (3) modernization of culture, society
and education was rigorously promoted; (4) assimilation of Korean
people as mainland (Japanese) people was promoted.
Her opinion differs from mine with respect that she clearlystated, “The Korean Peninsula under Japan’s control was clearly acolony of Japan,” but she also argued that it “had very different
characteristics, compared with those under Western Allies’
colonial control.”
The Outcome of Education: No Freedom of Speech
What I was less-informed about, however, was that in
educational institutions, anti-Japanese propaganda was taught toKorean students. And the present-day anti-Japanese sentimentsof the South Korean people, including that of former President
Lee-Myung-bak and incumbent Park Guen-hye, are a result ofsuch an anti-Japan “education”.
Oh further argues why such an anti-Japan mentality cannot
easily be wiped out. In a nutshell, according to Oh, “Korea’s
anti-Japan nationalism was not formed through Korea’s historicalexperience of colonial rule by Japan, but it was formed during thepost-war period by falsification and fabrication of the history of
the period of Japanese rule.” This well explains why the “Allied
nations’ victorious view of history” regarding Imperial Japan is insynch with South Korean views of history.
On July 31, 2013, a press conference was held at the Foreign
Correspondents’ Club of Japan. The guest speaker was Oh
Seon-hwa. It was not my first time seeing her, but it was indeed
my first time to see her at my “home” arena at the FCCJ.
Oh, originally from Jeju-do, South Korea, lost her nationality
in 1998 and became a naturalized Japanese citizen in 1991. She
won her fame in Japan with Swish of the Skirt—a compilation of
essays on comparative Japanese and Korean culture. Since then,her keen observations produced many best-selling books in Japan,
including critiques on politics as well as views on history, of which
Seoul was very critical.

7

The press conference was held because Oh was refused entry toSouth Korea at Incheon airport. She said she went to her mothercountry to attend the wedding of one of her nephews. She wasdenied entry in 2007 when she went to Seoul to attend hermother’s funeral, but was eventually allowed entry after she
contacted Japanese authorities.
What Oh Seon-hwa has done so far is writing books andlecturing. She has never even participated in anti-Korea protests.
How could a democratic state deny entry of any individual for
expressing his or her opinion by publishing and speaking?
Additionally, I have to say that, as far as I know, what she wrote inher books were fair and intelligent observations and factual
information. I even assumed that she was sympathetic, if not inlove, with the country she was born in—South Korea.
Oh is barred entry into Seoul, though such a decision in turndemonstrates that “freedom of speech” is not allowed in South
Korea.
Fabrication of history: “Sex Slaves” of the Japanese Army
Yoshida Seiji, now infamous story-teller, or a liar, published his
book entitled Korean Comfort Women and the Japanese in 1977.
His stories were groundless but the Asahi Shimbun reported themin September 2, 1982. The headline was “Testimony of the Comfort
Women Hunt.” Yoshida exaggerated his stories in his book entitled
My War Crimes – Abduction of Koreans. In this book, he wrote, he“and 9 of his subordinates abducted about 200 Korean women andmade them comfort women.” The Asahi played the trumpet,
reporting “50,000 to 70,000 Korean girls were coerced to be
comfort girls” based on the stories Yoshida told in his book, but
without any proof. Yoshida book was, then, translated into Korean
in August, 1989 and the anti-Japanese mood heightened.
Ms. Heo Yeong-seon, a reporter from the Jeju Ilbo newspaper,
however, doubted his story and conducted research in Jeju-do
Island only to find “not one witness for the stories described in thebook” and “islanders flatly denied the story as ‘nonsense’ andstrongly doubted the book’s credibility.” (August 14, 1989)
In 1992, a historian, Hata Ikuhiko, also conducted research in8

Jeju-do Island and the Sankei Shimbun reported that there was
no evidence to verify Yoshida’s stories. In August 11, 1991, The
Asahi Shimbun carried an article by one of its reporter, Uemura
Takashi. It was treated as a scoop entitled, “A Former Korean
Comfort Woman Opens Her Mouth.”
On January 11, 1992, The Asahi Shimbun carried an article
about “comfort women” on the front page above the fold. It
referred to a document found by Chuo University professor
Yoshiaki Yoshimi. Professor Yoshimi used it as a proof of military
involvement, but the document actually warned of malpractice bybusiness operators and called for the military police and the police
to strictly crack down on them. Nonetheless, then Prime Minister
Miyazawa Kiichi announced his apology two days later. Moreover,the PM apologized 8 times when he visited Korea on January 17,
1992. Since then, the Korean government has intensified its
demand for further apology from the Japanese government.
And, at last, the infamous Kono Statement was released on
August 4, 1993. The then-Chief Cabinet Secretary admitted toforceful abduction of Korean girls and expressed his apology.
“Comfort women” became an issue internationally when two
Japanese lawyers, Totsuka Etsuro and Kaido Yuichi brought thecase to the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations. Mr.
Totsuka used the term “sex slaves” to refer to “comfort women.” Mr.
Kaido is de facto husband of the incumbent Socialist Party leader
Fukushima Mizuho. They are the ones who disseminated the “sex-slave” Imperial Japanese Army issue at the UN.
On July 18, 1993, the Liberal Democratic Party lost control of
the government for the first time since 1955. The LDP came backas the ruling party while having then Socialist Party leader
Murayama Tomiichi as the Prime Minister of Japan on June 30,
1994. Then, the Asian Peace and Friendship Foundation for
Women, the current Asian Women’s Fund, was set up by theJapanese government to distribute compensation to comfort
women in South Korea and other Asian nations.
In 1996, a report was submitted to the U.N. Human Rights
Commission by Radhika Coomaraswamy. The report determinedthat the so-called comfort women served as “sex slaves” for theformer Imperial Japanese Army, based on the testimonies of Seiji

9Yoshida published from 1991 to 1992.
In 2000, Matsui Yayori, a feminist editor of The Asahi Shimbun,
launched a grotesque event called the International Women’s
Tribunal for War Crimes. The “tribunal” started on Dec. 8, the day
Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, and the judgment was announcedon Dec. 12: Emperor Hirohito was sentenced to death. Just likethe International Military Tribunal for the Far East (the so-called
Tokyo Trials) was a theater of revenge by MacArthur, Matsui’s
International Women’s Tribunal for War Crimes was also biased:to accuse Japan of “sex slavery.”In 2006, House Resolution 759, which stated that the“Government of Japan, during the colonial occupation of Asia andthe Pacific Islands from the 1930s through the duration of WorldWar II, organized the subjugation and kidnapping, for the sole
purpose of sexual servitude, of young women, who became known
to the world as ‘comfort women’”, passed the U.S. Congress
Foreign Affairs Committee. In 2007, Mike Honda who was, at thattime, backed by a Chinese-American lobbyist’s organization,
submitted House Resolution 121 which demanded that theJapanese government apologize for having forced young women to
become sex slaves during WWII.
Now the Korean government allowed construction of “comfort
girl” statues in front of the Japanese Embassy in Seoul, some U.S.
cities and a few other countries.
I personally met Matsuura Yoshiko, an assemblywoman ofSuginami Ward in Tokyo who visited the city of Glendale,
California together with 10 other local legislators representing
over 300 legislators all across Japan. As she had a press
conference at the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of Japan, I read
all the reports she carefully distributed. The stone monument in
Glendale placed next to a statue of a “comfort girl” says: “I was asex slave by Japanese military.” The explanation states: “Inmemory of more than 200,000 Asian and Dutch women who were
removed from their homes in Korea, China, Taiwan, Japan, thePhilippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, East Timor andIndonesia, to be coerced into sexual slavery by the Imperial Armed
Forces of Japan between 1932 and 1945.”

10

The United Nations Army adopted the Japanese “comfort women”
systemAll of the above-mentioned consolidated accusations of a“comfort women” system of the Imperial Japanese Army were noton solid grounds which could prove such was the case. Saying
comfort women were “sex slaves” of the Japanese Army ispropaganda and it is a fabrication of historical facts.
The “comfort women” were prostitutes. Some of them may besold by their parents to brothels due to their family poverty andthey were not in what they thought was an ideal profession. The
fact remains, however, that they were not “sex slaves” of theImperial Japanese Army. The Japanese Army established “comfort
stations” because of two main reasons: 1. concern for the health oftheir officers and soldiers, 2. to prevent Japanese army personnel
from resorting to rape or violence. According to Report No. 49
compiled by the U.S. Office of War Information published inAugust 1944, the comfort women “enjoyed picnics, sports, anddinner entertainment with Japanese officers and soldiers in their
free time,” and “were allowed to go back to their homes in Korea
when they had paid their debt to the broker,” and in addition they
were able to decline their services to clients who were drunk.
Their average monthly income was 750 yen when the averagemonthly wage of the Japanese soldiers was 10 yen.
The curious fact is that during the Korean War, the Allied, inother words, the United Nations, Army utilized the “comfort
women” system of the Imperial Japanese Army, organized by the
Korean government. UN Forces consisted mostly of the American
Army so it was America that also adopted the “comfort women”
system.
Even in 1960s, when I went to Korea, the term “comfort women”
was used as it was used so by the Imperial Japanese Army. The
Korean government had adopted the Imperial Japanese Army’s
system of “comfort women,” as it were.
According to the research report entitled Military and Sexual
Violence in the 20th Century Korean Peninsula, compiled by
Korean scholars, due to the outbreak of the Korean War, “comfort
women” for US officers and soldiers opened for business. They11

were ever “referred to as yanggonju (Western princess), yanggalbo(Westerner whore), UN madam, and Mrs. UN.” And the district for
prostitution was called Kijichon (Military or Camp Town).
The report says that their purposes were:
1. To protect ordinary women who were not prostitute,
2. To demonstrate the Korean government’s appreciation to
US troops,
3. To raise the moral of fellow soldiers.
Can the Korean government as well as the United Nations
criticize Japan because of the Imperial Japanese Army’s “comfort
women” system? If the answer is “yes,” why, then, did the Korean
government and the United Nations utilized the “comfort women”
system of the Imperial Japanese Army?
Henry Scott Stokes was born in
England in 1938. After earning an
undergraduate degree from Oxford
University in 1961, he joined the
Financial Times, Inc. He became its first
Tokyo branch representative in 1964. He
became Tokyo Bureau Chief of The Times
in 1967 and became Tokyo Bureau Chiefof The New York Times in 1978.
He is known as having the mostintimate access to Mishima Yukio among
all foreign reporters in Japan. In addition
Stokes has worked extensively in the arts. For almost a decade
after leaving The New York Times in 1984, he worked with New
York artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude on a joint work of art forJapan and America titled “The Umbrellas”. During the l990s heworked for several years for Mary Moore, the daughter of British
sculptor Henry Moore. Thereafter in the 2000s and 2010s he hasserved as a writer, editor and lecturer on a wide range of interests.

12

The Comfort Women Issue: An Ignored Perspective
Tony Marano - Author
The Comfort Women issue is a contentious issue between two
strategically important United States allies: Japan and South
Korea. One has to question why would the United States inject
itself in the middle of this issue, taking sides? By such an action
the USA adds a smile on the face of one ally while causing a frown
on another. As a diplomatic initiative, the validity of this action
comes into question.
If the issue was overt, with a clear demonstration of which nation
harbors the correct interpretation of this issue, then perhaps the
USA is correct in selecting one side to support. This Comfort
Women issue lacks a clear demonstration of who is correct.
It can be agreed Comfort Women did serve the Japanese Imperial
Army. It can be argued some of these women were forced, somewere tricked into service, and some coerced. The problem is aquestion arises from a few areas:
1 – In 1944, the United States Army captured some of these
Comfort Women in Burma. The ladies were interrogated by the
U.S. Army. The Army filed a Report Number 49 and noted theladies were well paid prostitutes. Remember this was at theheight of the war between the USA and Japan and the USA would
have enjoyed using these ladies as propaganda publicizing they
were forced into prostitution for the Japanese Army. The U.S.
Army did not do it because according to their report, it would havebeen a lie. This then places a serious question into the wholeissue of women being forced. Should not this aspect of the issue
be explored, if not balanced, into the discussion?
2 – The claim is 200,000 women from Korea forced into the
Comfort Women service. Where were the Korean men while
200,000 of their women are being carted off to servitude?
Compare the population of Korea during that period to the13population today of the USA, and this number would beequivalent to 3,000,000 American women. Do you think the restof the U.S. population would be docile while 3,000,000 women
were being forced into prostitution?
3 -During this period, over eight-hundred thousand Korean men
volunteered to join the Japanese Imperial Army. 17,364 Koreans(figure from 1938 to 1943 excluding after 1944) were recruited assoldiers and 126,047 Koreans were recruited as civilian employeeof the army. Why would so many men volunteered to join amilitary force responsible for enslaving so many of their women?
4 – The current president of South Korea is President Park
Geun-hye and her father, Park Chung-hee, served in the JapaneseImperial Army. He served with such distinction that he rose to
become an officer. Why would President Park Geun-hye’s father
serve a military with distinction that was responsible forenslaving 200,000 of his fellow countrywomen?
Incidentally, Park Chung-hee later became president of South
Korea. How does a man who volunteered to serve in theJapanese Imperial Army, serving with distinction, rising tobecome an officer -in a military that enslaved 200,000 of his
country’s women - get to become president of that very nation?
These are serious questions to consider they place doubt into theissue as proclaimed by South Korea. Because of these questions
equal weight must be given to the Japanese interpretation on thisissue. To ignore the Japanese version with respect to the above
information is to place dishonor upon a valuable and trusted allyof the USA, the nation and people of Japan. At best the USA
should not be seen as agreeing with one side at the cost of
disrespecting the other.
The City of Glendale, California selected to insert itself in thisinternational dispute by placing a statue in one of their parks
memorializing Comfort Women: “coerced into sexual slavery by
the Imperial Armed Forces of Japan between 1932 and 1945,” as14

written on the marble slab next to the statue.
On October 21, 2014 the Glendale City Council was informed a
new group of South Korean Comfort Women have come forward.
This new group is suing the South Korean government claiming
they were forced into serving as Comfort Women by the South
Korean military for the United States military from around 1950
through 1990. At the same meeting the City Council was advised
the current statue and adjacent marble slab are seen by the peopleof Japan as insult to their honor, pure Japan bashing.
It was suggested to the City Council to demonstrate consistency
and illustrate the statue and slab does not represent an insult to
the Japanese people by updating that marble slab to reflect thisnew group of Comfort Women. The suggestion was rejected by
the City of Glendale, and one can only interpret this rejection as
their desire to let the Japan bashing image of that statue remain
as is.
Members of the United States government and various
municipalities who select to enter into this issue on behalf of theirrespective governmental level should evaluate the issue not only
from a South Korean perspective but also from a Japaneseperspective. The USA and municipalities who side with one
while ignoring the other contributes to maintaining and enlarging
the rift in the Japan, USA, and South Korean alliance. This rift
is seen by United States adversaries in Asia with pleasure and asmile on their face, while they continue their belligerent
maneuvering in the region.
Resolutions and memorials to the Comfort Women as stated bySouth Korea are not accurate reflections of history when thatversion of history falls apart upon an examination void fromemotion. Members of the United States government would be
wise in questioning the motives behind the propagation of thisissue. While promoting the Comfort Women issue with Japan
seen as the evil factor in the equation, South Koreans are also
promoting renaming the Sea of Japan to the “East Sea”. Do you

15not see an obsession here? The United States should not alignitself with this obsession at the cost of alienating a valuable andtrusted ally.
When the United States and selected municipalities select a side
to align with one ally, this only serves to irritate the other ally. If
the United States and municipalities decided to remain out of thisdispute, a reasonable ally would agree, while anotherunreasonable ally would disagree. In the interest of remaining in
the middle one would agree both Japan and South Korea arereasonable, rational allies and both would agree, if not understand,
why the United States and municipalities decide to remain silent
on this issue. Neutrality by the United States and municipalities
is a route creating the least friction within the alliance.
Tony Marano was born inConnecticut, USA and grew
up in Brooklyn, New York.
An active youth, he played
various sports and was amember of the Boy Scouts.
He attended City Universityof New York and studied
history. While working for
AT&T, he experienced thefriendly relations of Texasand moved there.
He currently volunteers
at his church and is a member of the Knights of Columbus, aCatholic men's organization, Tony sets up his YouTube channel“PropagandaBuster” and on "OUTSIDESOUND" (with Japanesetranslations) to speak directly to the people, after seeing the leftist
bias of the mainstream US media. In 2009 he worked with
Asukashinsha Publishing on a book/DVD, published 4 books in2014 and another 2 books in 2015. Tony has written numerous
magazine and newspaper articles/columns. Currently his column
appears in a nationwide newspaper in Japan.

16

COMFORT WOMEN IN KOREA
KASE Hideaki, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact
Repercussions from remarks made by Osaka City Mayor
Hashimoto Toru about the so-called “comfort women” have been
felt throughout the world.
And as always, anti-Japanese public sentiment has risen to thesurface in South Korea.
Some Koreans have seized every possible opportunity to distort
facts and criticize Japan. I find it impossible to comprehend such
vitriol. .
However, matters are only made worse by the American responseto any mention of the comfort-women issue. The fact is that agreat many Americans have succumbed to the persistent,interminable campaigns waged by some Chinese and Koreans toconvince the world that the Japanese abducted innocent Asian
women and forced them to become sex slaves for Japanesemilitary personnel during World War II.
In 1993 Chief Cabinet Secretary Kono Yohei issued a statement
about the comfort women (the Kono Statement), which
acknowledged that government or military authorities wereinvolved with recruitment of comfort women. In 1995 Prime
Minister Murayama Tomiichi made a statement about Japaneseaggression during World War II. Since disavowal of thosestatements would encounter vehement objection from American
public opinion, the Obama administration is opposed to attempts
within Japan to refute the lies they contain.
Japanese authorities never abducted women. Nor did they force
them to become comfort women against their will. However, somerecruiters/agents, many of whom were Koreans misled women17

about the nature of the job. And , that is truly regrettable.
Accusations involving the comfort women, Japanese aggression
during World War II, and the Nanjing “massacre” are complete
fabrications, with absolutely no basis in fact. And incredible
though it may seem, the government of a democratic nation has
officially admitted to — and apologized for — acts that never took
place! It is no wonder that the entire world accepts the accusations
as valid.
For that very reason, Kono’s and Murayama’s transgressions are
grave indeed. We must take immediate steps to remove the stains
on our nation’s honor, for the sake of Japan’s national security.
Restoring Japan’s good name will increase respect for our nationand strengthen our diplomatic effectiveness.
Every nation has been involved in and in charge of facilities
enabling soldiers to satisfy their sexual needs without the risk ofcontracting venereal disease when those soldiers are engaged incombat on foreign soil. The Japanese military was no exception.
During World War II, Japanese military authorities establishedbrothels and contracted with local civilian Japanese and Koreanbrothel operators to recruit prostitutes.
Is it possible that prostitutes have never been hired to service
military personnel in South Korea?
The year before diplomatic relations were established between
Japan and South Korea, I traveled to Korea many times in mycapacity as a journalist. While there I often noticed
advertisements recruiting prostitutes to service US soldiers, in
Dong-a Ilbo and other leading Korean newspapers. They used theterm wianbu, the Korean pronunciation of the same term theJapanese had used when Korea was part of Japan.
The results of research on comfort women in South Korea, done bya group of Korean scholars, were published in book form two years

18ago under the title The Military and Sexual Violence.1
The book provides verification that United Nations Forces (UStroops) and the South Korean government were both involved in
and in charge of military prostitutes from the moment the Korean
War erupted.
In South Korea prostitutes servicing US troops were referred to as
yanggongju (western princess), yanggalbo (prostitute forwesterners), UN madam, and Mrs. UN. The district in which they
worked was called Kijichon (Camp Town).

The Military and Sexual Violence also reveals that military
prostitutes were hired for three reasons: (1) to protect Korean
women who were not prostitutes, (2) to demonstrate the Korean
government’s appreciation to US troops, and (3) to raise thesoldiers’ morale.
Korean soldiers also had access to prostitutes. Very few of thewomen who became prostitutes to service them did so of their own
free will. According to their testimonies, most of them wereabducted by Korean intelligence agents and forced into
prostitution within 24 hours.
The authors of the book maintain that the women were licensed
prostitutes from the viewpoint of the Korean government, but thatthey perceived themselves as sex slaves — victims of the Korean
military.
Immediately after the aforementioned research work was
published in 2002, a ban was placed on the examination of all
resources relating to military prostitutes servicing Korean troops
housed in the Reference Library of the Korean Ministry of
1Song Ok-yeon and Kim Yeong, eds., Guntai to sei boryoku: Chosen hanto no 20
seiki (The military and sexual violence: the Korean peninsula in the 20th century)(Tokyo: Gendai Shiryo Shuppan, 2010).

19

National Defense. When asked why, the relevant authorities
muddied the waters further by saying, “This has nothing to dowith the Japanese comfort women problem.”I wonder if we can expect to see demonstrators erect statues ofcomfort women — this time in front of the Korean Parliament andthe US Embassy.
Author Profile
KASE Hideaki is one of the mostprominent and distinguished writers
and commentators active today. He
specializes in political, military andinternational affairs. He is ranked as
one of the most popular lecturers inJapan.
He has served as a "special
advisor" to Prime Ministers Fukuda
Takeo and Nakasone Yasuhiro. In
addition, Mr. Kase has been anadviser to a number of government
Ministers, including Foreign Minister
Sonoda Sunao, in the Fukuda, Ohiraand Suzuki Cabinets, and Tanigawa Kazuho, Minister of Defense(Director General of the Japan Defense Agency) in the Nakasone
Cabinet.
Mr. Kase has published more than 100 books including one inEnglish (Kamikaze Japan’s Suicide Gods, co-authored with Albert
Axell, Longman, 2002). Fifty-five of those books were co-authoredor anthology, on a wide variety of subjects, including international
relations, history, education, culture and comparative religion. He
published , Korekara no Asia (The Emerging Shape of Asia), jointly with
President Lee Teng Hui of Taiwan in September,1996. Mr. Kase publishedautobiography in May, 2001.

20

The Falsehoods Inscribed on the Stone
Monument in Glendale andthe Comfort Women Controversy
MOTEKI Hiromichi, Secretary
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact
Inscribed on the stone monument in Glendale is as follows:“I was a sex slave ofJapanese military.”*Torn hair symbolizes
the girl being snatchedfrom her home by theImperial
Japanese
Army.
*Tight fists represent
the girl’s firm resolve fora deliverance of justice.
*Bare and unsettled feet
represent having been abandoned by the cold and unsympathetic
world.
*Bird on the girl’s shoulder symbolizes a bond between us and thedeceased victims.
*Empty chair symbolizes survivors who are dying of old age
without having yet witnessed justice.
*Shadow of the girl is that of an old grandma, symbolizing passageof time spent in silence.
*Butterfly in shadow represents hope that victims may resurrect
one day to receive their apology.
Peace Monument
In memory of more than 200,000 Asian and Dutch women who
were removed from their homes in Korea, China, Taiwan, Japan,
the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, East Timor andIndonesia, to be coerced into sexual slavery by the Imperial
Armed Forces of Japan between 1932 and 1945.

21

And in celebration of proclamation of “Comfort Women Day” by
the City of Glendale on July 30, 2012, and of passing of House
Resolution 121 by the United States Congress on July 30, 2007,
urging the Japanese Government to accept historicalresponsibility for these crimes.
It is our sincere hope that these unconscionable violations ofhuman rights shall never recur.
July 30, 2013
We can without doubt conclude that these words are 100%
false: huge lies. Allow me to explain why.
First, not a single woman was forcibly taken from her home by
the Imperial Japanese Army in Korea as part of the
Comfort-Women system. Absolutely none. That is clear because
the Japanese military had no such authority or legal right, norwere so irresponsible or ill-disciplined as to act as procurers. Ifthey had committed such acts, huge social problems would haveresulted, even in the prewar years. In fact, not a single Korean
claimed to have witnessed such behavior. According to themonument, more than 200,000 women were removed from theirhomes. Doesn’t anyone wonder why no witnesses have comeforward to substantiate these accusations?
What about the testimonies of former comfort women? The
truth is that none of them has offered reliable testimony to theeffect that she was forcibly taken to a war zone by the Japanesemilitary or Japanese authorities. There are four cases of forced
abduction in Testimonies, Part 1: Korean Women Abducted andForced To Become Comfort Women compiled by the Volunteer
Corps Research Group of the Korean Council for Women Draftedfor Military Sexual Slavery by Japan. However, as Prof. Ahn
Byong-jick of Seoul University admits, these completely contradict
the circumstances mentioned above. (Behind Comfort Women
Controversy: How Lies Became Truth by Nishioka Tsutomu2 , p.
2

Yoku wakaru ianfu mondai by Nishioka Tsutomu, Soshisha, Tokyo,
2007. English translation is at
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/39_S4.pdf ):22

41-42 ) No testimony proves the abduction claim. The women
were not asked or forced to go to a military zone. Rather, theywent there to earn money from prostitution, which was commonly
practiced at that time.
The only “proof” of abduction is My War Crime3, which was
written by Yoshida Seiji in 1983. The Asahi Newspaper and others
extensively reported on the comfort-women issue on the basis of
Yoshida’s book. However, the book turned out to be a hoax. His
fabrications were exposed in the August 14, 1989 issue of the Jeju
Ilbo Newspaper after a thorough and extensive investigation
conducted by one of the newspaper’s female reporters, together
with a local historian on Jeju Island, where author Yoshida said he
had conducted comfort-women hunts. Please refer to the copy of
the article from the Jeju Ilbo and its English translation on thefollowing page.
The local newspaper on the very island where Yoshida claimed
he hunted comfort women, conducted an investigation incollaboration with a local historian, and reported that no such
hunt ever took place. Nevertheless, the Asahi Newspaper
continued to report on the comfort-women issue for 25 years after
the truth was revealed as though Yoshida’s story was true,
ignoring the article in the Jeju Newspaper and refusing todiscredit Yoshida.
The Korean government took no heed of the revelations madeby a local newspaper in Korea, blindly believing what the Asahi
Newspaper, Japan’s media “authority”, printed. It continued to
criticize Japan on the basis of a false report. Now that we knowthat the Asahi Newspaper reports were fallacious, wouldn’t it be
the right thing to do if the Korean government sincerely reflected
on its conduct and apologized to Japan for its mistake?
Secondly, as stated in “A Guide to Understanding the
Comfort-Women
Controversy”(http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/113_S4.pdf); before World War II,
in Japan (in almost all countries as well at that time), prostitution
was legal and there were many houses of prostitution and other3

Watashi no senso hanzai by Yoshida Seiji, Sanichi Shobo, Tokyo, 1983.

23

Jeju Ilbo completely contradicts Yoshida’ s comfort women
kidnapping storyvia an article on August 14, 1989

On the occasion of the 44th anniversary of our Liberation, people are utterly
shocked at the publication of a record that described that 205 women from Jeju
Island were drafted as comfort women during the Imperial Japanese regime.
However, no witness is presented to back up the allegation, which invites various
reactions. [The outline of Yoshida’s book is then introduced.]
Not one witnesses for stories described in the book, including one that fifteen to
sixteen girls were forcibly drafted as comfort women at a shell-button factory in
Josanpo and other incidents of comfort women hunts conducted at various villages
such as Hokan-ri.
Islanders flatly denied the story as “nonsense” and strongly doubted the book’s
credibility. Chong Okutan (an eighty-five year old woman), who lives at Josanpo,
said, “In a village of a little over two hundred fifty households, if fifteen girls had
been drafted, it would have been a big event, but at that time, nothing of the sort
happened.”
Kim Pon-oku, a local historian, indignantly said, “After the Japanese-version
book was published in 1983, I conducted follow-up research for several years andfound out that it was not true. This book seems to be a product of the insincere
commercial spirit symbolizing Japanese people’s vice.”( Jeju Ilbo Article of August 14, 1989 written by Ms. Heo Yeong-seon )24

comparable establishments throughout Japan.
Similar facilities were established in war zones and there wasno particular illegal involvement on the part of the military. At
that time, while within Japan proper these facilities were freely
available, there were no such facilities in overseas war zones,
which could be considered discrimination against soldiers.
Therefore, the establishment of comfort stations was based on theprinciples of fairness and impartiality. It is well beside the point tocriticize this practice.
Thirdly, prostitution was not, in general, favorably consideredat that time, as it was called an ugly business. On the other hand,the profession was far more highly rewarded than ordinary jobs.
(The same is true today.) Therefore, prostitution was a good way
for poor and not particularly resourceful women to obtain a highincome. Again, that situation is the same today. Therefore, tocondemn this profession from the perspective of an infringementof women’s rights is one line of thinking, but this hardly leads toequal, universal justice. In fact, prostitutes in Seoul, South Korea
put on a huge rally on May 17, 2011.
This was a protest to save their profession, their claim being“Are we to be robbed of our right to engage in prostitution?” (Seephoto from Time Photo on the next page.) How do people who
believe prostitution is an issue of women’s rights respond tothe cries of these protesting women? Even today, when
prostitution is legally prohibited, prostitutes are demanding theirright to be prostitutes. Seventy years back, prostitution was
legally accepted, and yet the Japanese Army is condemned for
operating comfort stations because it was supposedly infringing on
women’s rights. I wonder how on earth this abnormality emerged.
The Japanese human rights advocates who criticized the use of
comfort women and deplored its criminality never protested
against the abductions of many Japanese citizens by North Korea,
nor did they take action to rescue them and bring them back home
to Japan. It is easily seen that the true “abnormality” lies here. I
must conclude that they are not earnestly trying to stand up forhuman rights. They are only criticizing Japan in the name ofhuman rights because of their conviction that the Japanese arevillainous. President Obama, Mrs. Hillary Clinton and other25

American human rights advocates must be made aware of this“abnormality” sooner or later.
Fourthly, since their business was conducted within dangerous
war zones, the comfort women could expect a higher salary thanthat offered by an ordinary prostitution facility.
As “AGuide to Understanding the Comfort-Women Controversy”((http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/113_S4.pdf)
indicates,amonthly payment of 300 yen was close to the rate cited innewspaper advertisements. However, actual income wasapparently much higher. According to Report No. 49, compiled by
the US Office of War Information, the average monthly income
was 750 yen. Moreover, Mun Ok-ju deposited her money in a
postal savings account in Burma while she worked as a comfort
woman. Later she filed a lawsuit, claiming that she could not get
her money back. It was not that the Japanese Army refused to pay
her, but that it could not pay her because she had lost her

26

savings-account passbook. Investigators discovered that theoriginal record book was kept at Shimonoseki Post Office and that
26,115 yen remained in her account. She saved that much moneyover two and a half years, which meant that she earned at least
1,000 yen per month. The salary of a private first class was 10 yen
per month, so her income was a hundred times higher than that ofJapanese soldiers. This was an extremely large amount of money.
Naturally, there were many women who wanted this lucrative
work, and there was no need to abduct women and force them tobe comfort women.
Fifthly, reflecting the conventional wisdom of that time as
described above, Report No. 49 of the US Office of War
Information conducted interviews with 20 Korean comfort women
who had become prisoners of war in Myitkyina, Burma, andconcluded, “A comfort girl is nothing more than a prostitute or
professional camp follower.” (See the photo on the next page. 4)This was nothing unusual.
The inscription on the monument in Glendale cites Japan as
the initiator of the comfort-women system. However, there was not
one case of abduction by the Imperial Japanese Army. It is too
absurd to mention whether there is any record left about this ornot. In the first place, any forcible abduction by the Army isimpossible in principle. It is the same with other countries. The
fact that such a thing could have never happened in Japan willclearly show what a big lie the monument tells.
As I wrote in “A Guide to Understanding the Comfort Women
Controversy”((http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/113_S4.pdf),
prostitution was the oldest profession in human history, and it was
not the matter of decades ago. As you all well know, the profession
is popularly performed still today. As I mentioned previously,
prostitutes in Korea held a big rally in May, 2011, lest their right4

The whole copy of the original report at the National Archive:

http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_4/8_S1.pdf
27

28

to prostitute be taken away. It is known that prostitutes of Koreannationality working in the United States outnumber those fromany other country. Many Korean prostitutes also have come to
Japan to do their business. They may have come for various
domestic or personal reasons to work in Japan. After they worked
as prostitutes under such hard conditions, would it be possible forthem to ask for an apology and compensation for such a hard timefrom the Japanese Government? At present, former comfort
women and the Korean Government are asking the Japanese
Government for an apology and compensation.
The Japanese Government has apologized, although they
maintain that there was no forcibility involved. Whether those
women suffered during harsh times or not, responsibility shouldhave mostly rested on the individual women or their parents.
Neither the Japanese Government nor the military are to be
blamed for their hardships. Under these circumstances, why does
Japan have to “apologize”? Since Japan apologized, everyone in
the world supposes that Japan must have done something wrong
or unjust. If some of us expect some countries to consider Japan
conscionable, that is totally beside the mark. The mere fact thatJapan did in fact apologize misses the essence of the matter andbecomes a fundamental point of disgrace to Japan, putting her
into a miserable plight.
The “comfort women issue,” which was entirely based on
fabrication, basically collapsed when the Asahi Newspaper finallyadmitted that their report was false. Essentially, Yoshida Seiji’s lie
was the only evidence of forced abduction of comfort women. The
local Jeju Ilbo (Jeju Daily Newspaper) clearly reported, after athorough investigation, that Yoshida’s story was fabricated in
1989. Even since then, the Asahi Newspaper has continued tomaintain that comfort women were forcibly abducted, not publicly
admitting to Yoshida’s fabrication. Their reporting should not becalled misreporting or a false report, but nothing more thanfabrication and distortion.
Since the Asahi Newspaper has held overwhelming authority
among the Japanese press and intellectuals, this fabricated reportby the Asahi Newspaper heavily influenced the Japanese
Government and politicians, so tremendously that they were29

obliged to make quite an off-of-the-point “apology” as well as the
Kohno Statement, studded itself with lies. Not only that, theKorean Government criticized Japan on the basis of the Asahi
report. Although their local Jeju Ilbo clearly concluded that
Yoshida’s story was 100% false, the Korean Government
shamefully, its own country’s very paper on point concerning theissue, continues to ride on the false report of Japanese Asahi
Newspaper.
Based on this 100% false information, the Koreans establisheda statue of a comfort woman in front of the Japanese Embassy inSeoul and put up another comfort woman statue, together with a
totally false inscription, in the City of Glendale, California, USA.
This is the real truth of the matter. It is the Koreans who spreadsuch enormous lies in the United States that should apologize andabolish this statue. At the same time, the City of Glendale isequally responsible, which not conducting proper research andturning a deaf ear to many conscientious Japanese and some of
their Assembly members, which approved the establishment of
this statue. The City of Glendale should apologize for this error
and immediately remove the statue.
Born in Tokyo in 1941, Moteki
Hiromichi graduated from Tokyo
University’s Faculty of Economics.
After working for Fuji Electric, Inc.
and the International Wool Secretariat,
he established Sekai Shuppan, Inc.
and published the Japanese/English
instructional magazine Mangajin incooperation with Mangajin, Inc., its
American counterpart.
Among his many publications are It
Is Not Necessary to Teach English in Primary School (Kodansha,Inc.), Low Radiation Should Not Be Feared (Nisshin-hodo). He
translated Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War, written
by James Wood (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham), into Japanese; it
was published by WAC, Inc. (Tokyo).

30