There Is Not a Single “Real Photograph”
Documenting the Nanking Incident
Mizoguchi Ikuo
Co-author of Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of Nanking Incident
1. Introduction
There has been an abundance of so-called evidential photographs allegedly depicting
the Nanking Incident in the world. The institution in the city of Nanking, in the People’s
Republic of China, popularly known as the Nanking Massacre Memorial Museum, inparticular, is a treasure-trove of such popular yet groundless photos of vague origins.
Most of the photographs on exhibition at this “memorial museum” are of unknown
sources. Some of those that are well-identified origins are either a composite or
distorted from the original photos used in Japanese newspapers, magazines andelsewhere. Others are secretly reproduced or mis-captioned from the originals. At theMuseum, voluminous photographic albums full of these dubious photos are sold asauthentic to visitors.
Even in Japan, books using those photos, without any verification of their authenticity,
are still sold at bookstores and are displayed on the bookshelves of many libraries
nationwide. In recent years, it has been proved that those photos have nothing to do with
the Nanking Incident. This notion is becoming increasingly common knowledge among
us Japanese.
I joined a research group, led by Professor Higashinakano Shudo of Asia University,
to examine and analyze a total of over 30,000 of these photographs. It took nearly three
years to complete the research. The result was published as a book entitled Nankin Jiken“Shoko Shashin” Wo Kenshosuru (Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of theNanking Incident) (Soshisha, 2005). This book became a bestseller at one point,
attracting much public attention and interest. The entire translation of this book isavailable at this site.( http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/26_S4.pdf)
Now, I will take up some typical, so-called self-claimed evidential photos of the“Nanking Massacre” and verify that there is truly not a single photo which can beconsidered as evidence of the Nanking Massacre.
2. The whole scheme was war propaganda plotted by the Nationalist Party

1

The Nanking Incident generally refers to the sequence of events, namely, cases ofmass murders, violence, rapes, plunder and arson, allegedly committed by the JapaneseArmy for six weeks after the fall of Nanking in December 1937 during theSino-Japanese War. The issue came up at the Tokyo Trials (International Military
Tribunal for the Far East), which started in 1946. At the time, the allegation was a boltout of the blue to the Japanese.
Soon enough, in July 1937, about nine years prior to the Tokyo Trials, and six months
after the fall of Nanking, What War Means, edited by Harold Timperley, and its
Chinese-language version, Japanese Military Atrocities Witnessed by Foreigners werepublished for the first time in the world, thereafter propaganda suddenly started tospread, accusing the Japanese Army of atrocities.
Recently, top-secret documents entitled The Outline of Operations of theInternational Propaganda Office (published in 1941), “produced by” the Nationalist
Party’s Propaganda Department during the time of the Republic of China era, werediscovered by Professor Higashinakano Shudo of Asia University. It has turned out thatthe two books are referred in the documents, and the following facts have been verified.
1) What War Means was a propaganda book, contrived and published by thePropaganda Department of the Nationalist Party.
2) The “Nanking Massacre” was not mentioned in the description of this Outline ofOperations. It mentioned “rape, arson, and plunder” of Japanese army as acts ofmost wicked injustice, but the word “massacre” is not found anywhere.
As part of this propaganda operation, the Nationalist Party’s Propaganda Department
determined to have international friends of the Chinese people disseminate war
propaganda on their behalf. The editor of What War Means was an Australiancorrespondent named Harold Timperley of the Manchester Guardian, and a major
contributor to the book was Rev. Miner Searle Bates, an American professor at theUniversity of Nanking and at the same time a missionary, who was an advisor to theNationalist government. Rev. George Fitch, another contributor to the book, was also an
American and YMCA secretary in Nanking. His wife was a close friend of Mrs. ChiangKai-shek.
Furthermore, it has been already verified by Autobiography by Zeng Xubai(published in 1988), head of the International Propaganda Office of the Nationalist
Party’s Propaganda Department, that the Nationalist Party’s Propaganda Department
provided funds to publish such books as What War means and War Damage in the2

Nanking Area, December 1937 to March 1938, edited by Lewis S.C. Smythe (1938).
3. Sources of the “photographic evidence” of the Nanking Incident
Numerous books claiming that a massacre actually took place in Nanking have been
published. In many cases, frequently used “staple photos” are included in those books.
Typical examples are Photos 1 and 2.

Photo 1: This photo is shown in Record of Atrocities Committed by the Japanese Enemy,edited by National Military Council of the Nationalist Government (1938). The shadows
cast by the persons in the photo are directionally inconsistent. Also, it is common practicefor a Japanese using his sword to step his right foot forward before the left foot whenengaged in beheading someone, otherwise the left foot would be injured. But the man’sfoot positions are the opposite. These lead to the conclusion that this is a composite andstaged photograph.

3

Photo 2: This photo first appears in Record of Atrocities Committed by the Japanese
Enemy. The figures in front and in back are dimensionally inconsistent, and the shadows
are ambiguous as to who cast them. Therefore, it is determined that this is a composite
photo.

Incidentally, the aforementioned What War Means written in English does notinclude photos, but its Chinese translation edition, Record of Atrocities Committed bythe Japanese Enemy, edited by the Political Department of National Military Council ofthe Nationalist Government (currently housed in the Hoover Institution of StanfordUniversity) holds 39 photos. Another Chinese-language version of Timperley’s What
War Means is titled Japanese Military Atrocities Witnessed by Foreigners (HongKong and Hankou editions exist and the latter was examined), and holds 31
photographs. So altogether a total of 70 photographs. Subtracting seven photos thatappear commonly in either of the two books, we then have 63 source photographs.
The 63 photographs that appeared between 1937 and 1938 have the following
characteristics:

41) For most of them, it is not certain who took them or, where and when they weretaken. As few as ten photos are verifiable by the photographers’ names, time andplace of the photographing.
2) Many photos are judged to be reproduced or distorted from the original one, withfabricated captions.
3) Many of them appear to have been taken at a different time of the year other thanwinter, when the Japanese Army took Nanking. Moreover, the location cannot beidentified as Nanking.
4) There is not a single photo that indicates a mass killing. Only two of them show tenor so bodies, while most photos show one or two bodies. In many cases, they arebodies of women and children.
4. “Photographic evidence” appeared in Travels in China
After the War, at the time of the Tokyo Trials and Nanking Trials, a book entitled
Pictorial History of the Chinese War against Japan (1947) was published, in which thefirst description of the “Great Massacre of Nanking” appeared, together with photos,
claiming that 300,000 were killed, outnumbering the atomic-bomb victims ofHiroshima and Nagasaki. This is allegedly a plot intended by the countries of theAllied Forces to offset the damage inflicted by the atomic bombs dropped on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This Pictorial History carries seven of the aforementioned 63
photos, including Photos 1 and 2. Thereafter, it was not until 1971 that the Nanking
Incident was an issue of controversy.
A year prior to the resumption of diplomatic relations between Japan and China, one
Japanese newspaper in particular was allowed to station its reporters in China. That isthe Asahi Shimbun, while other newspapers were not granted such a privilege. Asahi
Shimbun reporter Honda Katsuichi wrote Travels in China, without verifying what theChinese had told him. His serialized article, not having been based on historical facts,
was subjected to some refutations from those who had been in Nanking at that time.
Naturally, Honda could not satisfactorily respond. In spring of 1972, immediately
before the resumption of Sino-Japanese diplomatic ties, Honda’s serialized article waspublished as a book. Thereupon many photographs referred to as “evidence of theNanking Incident” began to appear in various publications in Japan. The ominous
ringleader that spread the groundless Nanking Massacre story is none other thanfamous Japanese reporter Honda Katsuichi.

5

In Honda’s book, many of the “source photos” used in Record of Atrocities
Committed by the Japanese Enemy were borrowed. Here, I will pick out Photos 3 and5 out of the previously-mentioned 63 photos, and illustrate how Honda Katsuichichanged the original captions.

Photo 3: From Record of Atrocities Committed by the Japanese Enemy. This photo is also usedin other publications including Honda Katsuichi Zenshu 14 (Complete Collection of Honda
Katsuichi’s Works, Volume 14).

Photo 4: Asahi Ban Shina Jihen Gaho (Asahi Edition: Pictorial of the Sino-JapaneseIncident) (December 5, 1937 issue, the back cover). The cover indicates that Japanese
troops paid money and purchased chickens.

6

Photo 4 is the source of Photo 3. The former originally appeared in Asahi Edition:
Pictorial (December 5, 1937 issue), published prior to December 13, 1937, whenNanking fell.
The caption of the photo reads: A Japanese soldier marches, carrying chickens
around his neck, which were purchased at the homes of Chinese citizens.
(Photographed by correspondent Ogawa on October 29 at Feng Yuezhen on
Nanking-Hankou Railway)
However, in Complete Collection of Honda Katsuichi’s Works, Vol. XIV(Compilation: Travels in China), the same photo carries the caption: Livestock likegoats and chickens have all been looted as war trophies.
Honda Katsuichi, ignoring the fact that Japanese troops duly paid money whenpurchasing things, makes up a different story.
Moreover, Photo 3 was not included in Travels in China, published in 1972, but 23
years after the publication of Travels in China, Honda added the photo in his Complete
Collection, using a false caption.
Honda Katsuichi also includes Photo 5 in his Complete Collection, Vol. XIV. He
introduces the photo, quoting the following caption: Japanese soldiers hunt and take
women and children away. Victims of violent rapes and gang-rapes range from sevento eight-year-old little girls to old women over seventy.

7Photo 5: This was printed in Record of Atrocities Committed by the Japanese Enemy. This
photo first appears in Asahi Graphic (November 10, 1937). The photo shows Chinese
peasants on their way home after laboring on farms, escorted by Japanese soldiers.
In Complete Collection of Honda Katsuichi’s Works, Vol. XIV, Honda describes: This
picture shows Japanese soldiers hunting and taking away women and children. It isreported that victims of violent raping and gang-raping range from little girls of 7 to 8 toold women over 70.

Kasahara Tokushi, then professor at Utsunomiya University, used Photo 5 in his
book entitled Nankin Jiken (The Nanking Incident), explaining the photo quite
differently from the fact: Japanese soldiers abduct Chinese women in the Henanregion.
Later, it was made clear by Hata Ikuhiko, former professor of Nihon University, that
this very photograph was in Asahi Graphic (November 10, 1937 issue).
The true description of the photo reads: Fellow Japanese soldiers escort children andwomen back to their village of “Hinomaru” (Japanese National Flag) after a day’s
farming on the field.
Honda, without fully examining the Asahi Graphic published by his own newspaper,
intentionally inserts the photo with the altered explanation in Compilation: Travels inChina, Complete Collection of Honda Katsuichi’s Works, Vol. XIV.
5. Newly introduced “photographic evidence”
In 1982, over the issue of changing descriptions from “aggression” to “advance”
with regards to Japan’s actions on the Chinese continent during the World War II, amisconceived newspaper article caused diplomatic friction between Japan and China.
Suddenly at the time, publication of various books claiming that the Nanking Massacre
actually took place began in Japan. Major books of this kind were mostly published byAsahi Shimbun.. The newspaper is well known among the Japanese for its
anti-government articles.
Incidentally, in the book entitled Nankin Daigyakusatu no Genba he (To the Scene ofthe Nanking Massacre), co-authored by Hora Tomio, Fujiwara Akira and Honda
Katsuichi, and published in 1988, nearly 40 years after the Nanking Trials, the story of“An Album of 16 Photographs”(so to speak) is written. It roughly goes as follows:“It’s difficult to definitely say when, but sometime between 1937 and 1939, a8

Japanese soldier decided to have his photos printed. A clerk at a photo studio in
Nanking printed an extra set of photos besides those requested by the Japanesecustomer. He kept the set for himself. In 1941, another Chinese happened to find thosephotos, and he secretly kept them until after the War was over and then he submitted
the photos to the court of the Nanking Trials. This photographic evidence was usedagainst Tani Hisao at the war criminal trial. (Author’s note: Tani Hisao was 6th
Division Commander of the Japanese Army and had led in the battle to take Nanking
in 1937.)
Seven of these 16 photos are inserted in To the Scene of the Nanking Massacre.
Photo 2 (already discussed) and Photo 6 are among the seven.

Photo 6: The acquirer of this photo reportedly kept it until the Nanking Trials were
held in 1947. However, the photo already appeared in the January 10, 1938 issue of Lifemagazine.

Photo 2 appeared in Record of Atrocities Committed by the Japanese Enemy,
9published in July 1938, while Photo 6 was shown in the January 10, 1938 issue of Lifemagazine. Therefore, the explanation of “secretly kept until after the War ended andthen submitted to the Nanking Trials” is a sheer lie. This is the real story of the faked“Album of 16 Photographs.”
6. Shadows in the photos reveal in what season the photographing took place
Photo 7 also appears in “An Album of 16 photographs.”

Photo 7: From page 221 of To the Scene of the Nanking Massacre. This photo wasreportedly kept in secret until the Nanking Trials were held in 1947. However, a photowith a very similar background is carried in the Chinese-language version of JapaneseMilitary Atrocities Witnessed by Foreigners, published in July 1938.

10

At a glance one can easily see that the solider is thinly clad, so it has been said thephoto is not fit for the middle of December when Nanking fell. There has been nostrong evidence offered to prove that it was not taken in winter (December).
There is another photo, namely, Photo 8, which represents very similar spectatorsand trees in the background. A close examination of Photo 8 reveals that there is ashadow clearly cast under the right foot of the standing man.
The angle (θ) formed by the line connecting the tips of his heel and the shadow, andthe ground level is measured at 78 degrees.

Photo 8: From page 119 of The Rape of Nanking, co-authored by Shi Yong and Yin
11

Jijun. The angle θ is 78 degrees and the sun’s position is very high up. It is probably Mayor June.

Judging from the theoretical angle at the time of meridian transit (nearly at noon), itturns out that the angle of 78 degrees cannot occur in December, the month Nanking
fell. Specifically, it is decided that the actual time of year when the photo was taken is
May or June (Chart 1).

Chart 1: The Relation between L (length of shadow) and H (height of object)
The fluctuations of the ratio of the shadow’s length to the object’s height over the year
( In the city of Nanking at the Meridian Transit)
The summer solstice

June 21

the autumnal equinox

September 23

The winter solsticeDecember 21

the vernal equinox

March 21

The summer solstice

June 21

There is a confidential report among the aforementioned top-secret documents ofthe Nationalist Party’s Propaganda Department, entitled The Outline of Operations ofthe International Propaganda Office of the Central Propaganda Department. The
report goes as follows. Here, “this office” refers to the Nationalist Party’s International
12

Propaganda Office.
“This office started to take up photographing mission under such circumstances, asin the spring of 1938, International Newspaper Photography Company, following ourinstruction, transferred all the photographic equipments, apparatus and materials,
together with several thousand photos which had already been taken during news
coverage activities, to the photography section of Central News Agency, and then weprovided monthly fees so that all those involved in the work would fully cooperate anddo their best to produce the maximum photographic effects.”
In other words, a full-scale operation to produce and circulate propaganda photos
was launched in the spring of 1938, about four months after the fall of Nanking. Thismay explain why people in the photos apparently wear short-sleeved garments or are
thinly dressed, quite unfit for winter. We can also feel quite convinced as to why thedead bodies shown in the photos were rarely dressed in warm winter clothes.
Ordinarily, in December in the midst of severe winter, most citizens of Nanking wouldwear thickly-textured Chinese garments.
7. Conclusion
If they claim that 200,000 to 300,000 Chinese were massacred in six weeks after thefall of Nanking, then, no doubt there will be evidential photos to prove that such amassacre took place.
However, there are no such photos that unquestionably suggest a massacre thatclaimed 200,000 or 300,000 lives. Let alone a massacre, there is no “photographicevidence” showing acts of rape, arson or plunder at all.
In any case, the truth is that any photograph valid enough to be used as evidence of
the Nanking Incident is nowhere to be found in the world.
[References]
Higashinakano Shudo, Kobayashi Susumu, and Fukunaga Shinjiro, Nankin Jiken“Shoko Shashin Wo Kenshosuru (Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of theNanking Incident), Soshisha.
Japanese Society for History Textbook Reform, Shi 49 Go (History, Issue 49), (March2005).

13