Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbour
ignited the liberation of Asia from Western domination
by Senaka Weeraratna, Attorney at Law (Sri Lanka)
Today (December 7, 2016) marks the 75th anniversary of the Japanese bombing
raid on Pearl Harbour. Special ceremonies are being organized in Hawaii tocommemorate the event. Many will remember the loss of their loved ones, friends
and relatives. We share their grief.
On December 7, 1941, Pearl Harbour was attacked by 353 Japanese fighter planes,
bombers, and torpedo planes in two waves, launched from six aircraft carriers. All eight
U.S. Navy battleships were damaged, with four sunk. The Japanese also sank or
damaged three cruisers, three destroyers, an anti-aircraft training ship, and one
minelayer. 188 U.S. aircraft were destroyed; 2,403 Americans were killed and 1,178
others were wounded. Japanese losses were light: 29 aircraft and five midget
submarines lost, and 64 servicemen killed.
The purpose of this article is not to embark on an inquiry to determine who was at
fault and who was not. This is a complex issue with enough evidence freely
accessible today to show that Japan was not totally to blame for the attack on Pearl
Harbour, since it was pushed under unavoidable circumstances to enter the war
with no other option left to secure oil to sustain its existence as a nation, after USA
regardless of probable consequences deliberately ceased oil exports to Japan in
July 1941.
Instead, what is intended here is to examine the effects of the Japanese attack on
Pearl Harbour and other western colonial possessions in Asia, on the psychology
and morale of the people of Asia then mostly under western colonial domination,
and ask whether Japan’s anti–colonial leadership and battle success in the earlyphase of the War helped Asia’s freedom fighters to step up their campaign forliberation from foreign occupation and achieve independence.
In the early part of the 20th century, it is undisputed that Japan was the only
country in the world that stood out openly for the liberation of Asia from westerncolonialism and had the capacity and resources to take on the challenge. ‘Asia for
Asians’ became a battle cry of the Japanese. No other Asian country including
1

China and India, took up such a Pan–Asian slogan or was placed in such militarilystrong position.
On the day following the attack on Pearl Harbour, i.e. December 8, 1941, an
Imperial Rescript described Japan's war aims: to ensure Japan's integrity and to
remove European colonialism from and bring stability to East and Southeast Asia.
On December 08, 1941, the Japanese Prime Minister Hideki Tojo read out theJapanese Emperor Hirohito’s proclamation of war to the Empire, excerpt of which
are as follows:"It has been unavoidable and far from Our wishes that Our Empire has been brought tocross swords with America and Britain.
"Eager for the realization of their inordinate ambitions to dominate the Orient, both
America and Britain, …. have aggravated the disturbances in East Asia. Moreover,these two powers, inducing other countries to follow suit, increased military
preparations on all sides of Our Empire to challenge us. They have obstructed by every
means our peaceful commerce and finally resorted to direct severance of economic
relations, menacing gravely the existence of Our Empire.
"Patiently have we waited and long have we endured in the hope that Our Government
might retrieve the situation in peace.
"But our adversaries, showing not the least spirit of conciliation, have unduly delayed asettlement, and in the meantime they have intensified the economic and politicalpressure to compel thereby Our Empire to submission.
"This turn of affairs would, if left unchecked, not only nullify Our Empire's efforts ofmany years for the sake of the stabilization of East Asia, but also endanger the very
existence of our nation.
"The situation being such as it is Our Empire for its existence and self-defense has noother recourse but to appeal to arms and to crush every obstacle in its path.”
President Roosevelt called the attack on Pearl Harbour ‘a day of infamy’.

2Prime Minister Winston Churchill declared that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harborwas “a staggering blow” and “our prestige suffered with the loss of Hong Kong”. In
early 1942, Churchill reassured the House of Commons amidst widespread, mass
resistance to colonialism in India, that the Atlantic Charter's provisions were not“applicable to [the] Coloured Races in [the] colonial empire, and that [the phrase]‘restoration of sovereignty, self-government and national life'...[was] applicable only to
the States and the Nations of Europe’.
Japan's war policy intended a total break from Western dependence, including arejection of bankrupt Western cultural traditions, which had been slavishly adopted
since the Meiji restoration, and a return to an Asian consciousness (as opposed toWestern) and civilizational values as a source for national greatness. Critical to thenation's survival in the midst of unbridled Westernization was political and culturalregeneration and a pan-Asian solidarity under Japanese leadership which was articulated
as a new Order for Asia in resistance to Western imperialism.
Matsuoka Yosuke, Japanese Foreign Minister, proclaimed the “Greater East Asia
Co-Prosperity Sphere” in August 1940. The idea of decolonization under Japaneseleadership resonated with Asians widely because, in the words of former U.S. President
Herbert Hoover in 1942, “universally, the white man is hated by the Chinese, Malayan,
Indian and Japanese alike,” due to his heartless and spiteful conduct as a colonial masterover a few hundred years.
Japan’s military success in the Battle of Tsushima in 1905 fired the dreams of
Asians and Africans for freedom
Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany appealed to Europe to rise above its parochial disputes todefend “your holiest possession,” Christianity and European civilization, against therising threat of the “Yellow Peril”.
Within a decade of the German Kaiser's raising of the alarm of the danger of the“yellow peril,” Japan defeated Russia in 1905. It prompted a young Oxford lecturer,
Alfred Zimmern, to put aside his lesson on Greek history to announce to his class “themost historical event which has happened, or is likely to happen, in our lifetime has
happened; the victory of a non-white people over a white people.”3

Japan’s spectacular military victories at the beginning of the 20th century and theirimpact on Asian intellectuals are well documented in Pankaj Mishra’s book titled,“From the Ruins of Empire: The Revolt Against the West and the Remaking ofAsia.”
This work is a survey of Asian intellectuals in the late 19th and early 20th centuries andtheir role in pan-Asian, pan-Islamic, and anti-colonial movements. The book begins
with an electrifying moment in Asia’s struggle for liberation from Western domination:
the spectacular Japanese naval victory over Russia at the Battle of Tsushima in May
1905, which stunned Asians and Africans living at the time under the yoke ofcolonialism.
This victory of the small but resurgent Japanese navy over the imperial might of what
was then accepted as a major European power fired the imagination of an entire
generation of Asian leaders.
Jawarharlal Nehru, Mohandas Gandhi, Sun Yat-Sen, Mao Zedong, the young Kemal
Ataturk and nationalists in Egypt, Vietnam and many other countries welcomed Japan’s
decisive triumph in the Russo-Japanese War with euphoric zeal. "And they all drew thesame lesson from Japan's victory," Pankaj Mishra writes. "White men, conquerors of theworld, were no longer invincible."
Even Lord Curzon, Viceroy of India, noted that "the reverberations of that victory havegone like a thunderclap through the whispering galleries of the East." The world wars
that followed further shrunk Europe of much of what remained of its moral and politicalauthority in Asian eyes. "In the long view, however," Mishra concludes, "it is the battleof Tsushima that seems to have struck the opening chords of the recessional of theWest."
Japan’s defeat of Russia in 1905 was uplifting news for Asians. For the first time since
the middle ages, a non-European country had vanquished a European power in a major
war. And Japan's victory gave way to a hundred- and-one fantasies – of national
freedom, racial dignity, or simple vengefulness – in the minds of those who had bitterly
endured European occupation of their lands. Mahatma Gandhi then made an astute far
reaching forecast. He remarked that "so far and wide have the roots of Japanese victoryspread that we cannot now visualise all the fruit it will put forth."4

Japan’s proposal for equality of races at League of Nations
Japan had championed the cause of peoples under European colonial rule at the Treatyof Paris (1918–19) and the formation of the League of Nations. Japan proposed anamendment to the League's covenant that would ensure “equal and just treatment inevery respect, making no distinction, either in law or in fact, on account of their race or
nationality.” To their great shame, the western colonial powers rejected the notion ofequality between human beings, fearing that it would become a challenge to white
supremacy and the Colonial Order which suppressed non–white people. However,Japan by this proposal for recognition of equality of all, gained the esteem of Asians
and Africans as the “logical leader of all coloured peoples.”In respect to the Second World war, Jawaharlal Nehru observed;“it became ever clearer that the western democracies were fighting not for a change but
for a perpetuation of the old order, ” and both the Allied and Axis powers shared acommon war interest, the preservation of white supremacy and the colonial status quo.
Both sides, he noted, embraced legacies of “empire and racial discrimination,” and inaffirmation after the war, “the old imperialisms still functioned....”
Japan’s stunning military victories in 1941 - 1942
Thirty-six years after its victory in the Battle of Tsushima, Japan struck the greatest
decisive blow ever by any non – white country or non – white people to European
power in Asia with the attack on Pearl Harbour. In about 90 days, beginning on
December 8, 1941, Japan overran the possessions of Britain, the US and theNetherlands in east and south-east Asia, taking the Philippines, Singapore, Malaya,
Hong Kong, the Dutch East Indies, much of Siam and French Indochina, and Burmawith bewildering swiftness to stand poised at the borders of India by early 1942. Allover Asia, subject people cheered the Japanese advance into countries forcibly held andoccupied by western colonial powers.
Days before Singapore fell to the Japanese in early 1942, the Dutch Prime
Minister-in-Exile, Pieter Gerbrandy, had conveyed his fears and anxieties to Churchill
and other Allied leaders in the following words "Japanese injuries and insults to theWhite population … would irreparably damage white prestige unless severely punishedwithin a short time".
5

Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysia's former Prime Minister, has said “most Asians felt
inferior to the European colonisers and rarely did we even consider independence a
viable option.” The colonies, he explained, were structured “to serve the European
demand for raw materials and natural resources,” and were thus dependencies. But
Japan's expulsion of the British “changed our view of the world,” showing that “anAsian race, the Japanese” could defeat whites and with that reality dawned “ a new
awakening amongst us that if we wanted to, we could be like the Japanese. We did havethe ability to govern our own country and compete with the Europeans on an equal
footing.” So despite the suffering under Japanese wartime occupation and the“tremendous disappointment” over the return of the British after the war, Mohamad
wrote, the shackles of “mental servitude” had been broken.
Similarly, Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew testified that Japan's defeat of the British“completely changed our world”.
Expressions of praise and gratitude to JapanThe Japanese with their stunning military victories over a common foe had made Asianpeople proud and stand erect with their heads held high.
“Britain was colonizing, enslaving Asian people before WW2. They ruled theIndian people for 180 years. It was Japan that got rid of the British from most of
Asia and later all those countries gained independence.”“Japan lost WW2 but as the consequence of Japan’s entry to war all S E Asian
countries and India achieved their long hoped for independence from the Westerncolonial powers within 15 years after the end of the War.”British historian Arnold Toynbee said:“Japan put an end to West’s colonialism in Asia once and for all.”Toynbee added “In World War II, Japanese people left a great history. Not for theirown country but for countries that achieved benefit from the War. Those countries wereones that were included in the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, a short-lived
ideal that Japan held out. The biggest achievement Japanese people left in history is thatthey succeeded in displaying the fact that Westerners who dominated the world werenot "Undefeatable Gods."”
6

Former Thai Prime Minister Kukrit Pramoj Expressed his Admiration
for Japan
The former Prime Minister of Thailand, Kukrit Pramoj, who was Chief Editor of thenewspaper ‘Siam Rath’ at the time and who took office as Prime Minister in 1973,
stated:“It was thanks to Japan that all nations of Asia gained independence. For Mother Japan,
it was a difficult birth which resulted in much suffering, yet her children are growing up
quickly to be healthy and strong.
“Who was it that enabled the citizens of the nations of Southeast Asia to gain equal
status alongside the United States and Britain today? It is because Japan, who acted likea mother to us all, carried out acts of benevolence towards us and performed feats ofself-sacrifice. December 8th (1941) is the day when Mother Japan – who taught us thisimportant lesson – laid her life on the line for us, after making a momentous decisionand risking her own well-being for our sake.
“Furthermore, August 15th (1945) is the day when our beloved and revered mother was
frail and ailing. Neither of these two days should ever be forgotten.”
http://www.japanese-greatest.com/mentality-culture/animation/kukrit-pramoj.html
Long accustomed to servility in colonial countries, western powers grossly
underestimated the post-war nationalism that the Japanese had both wittingly andunwittingly unleashed. They had also severely miscalculated their own staying power
among foreign subject people innately hostile to them. Despite futile counter-insurgency
operations and full-scale wars, especially in Indochina, the spread of decolonisation was
swift and extraordinary.
Burma, which hardly had a full blown nationalist movement before 1935, became freein 1948. The Dutch in Indonesia resisted with a rear guard defense and US and British
assistance but Indonesian nationalists led by Sukarno finally overpowered them andpushed them out in 1953. Postwar chaos forced Malaya, Singapore and Vietnam intolong periods of insurgencies and wars, but an ultimate European retreat was never indoubt.
Japan’s unsung role in India’s independence struggle
7

British governance in India — three centuries of exorbitant taxation, unfair tradepractices, rampant free-marketeering and deliberate starvation had led to the deaths ofmillions of Indians in preventable famines. Japan played a critical (largely unsung) rolein India’s struggle for independence by supporting Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose andassisting him to form the Indian National Army (INA).
It is argued with vehemence by informed observers that without Bose’s INA, India
might never have achieved independence.
This is because, although the INA failed militarily in the Battles at Kohima and Imphal
along the India–Burma border in 1944 as part of the Japanese attempted entry to India,
its troops (INA) got another opportunity to challenge the British Colonial Government
in a Delhi courtroom in 1945. Three INA Officers were put on trial for treason at Red
Fort. This move backfired on the British. The accused a Muslim, Sikh and Hindu
justified their roles as liberators of a colonized nation and won the sympathy of the
Indian public.
This led to support for the defendants spreading throughout the nation — including
among Indians serving in the British Indian Army. These newly radicalized troops
staged strikes and mutinies across the subcontinent in 1946 against the British
occupation. With its once-solid military foundation shaken to the core — and facing
widespread, huge demonstrations and possible mutinies by the three forces, Army,
Navy and Air Force, on a scale bigger than the Indian Mutiny in 1857 — the British
authorities decided that it was time to pack up and leave. On August 15, 1947, they
granted India its independence.
An unwise partition of the Indian subcontinent, which placed two new nation-states inendless conflict, marked Britain's humiliating departure from India in 1947.
"Europe," Jean-Paul Sartre claimed in his preface to Franz Fanon's Wretched of the
Earth, seemed to be "springing leaks everywhere." "In the past we made history," Sartre
asserted, "and now it is being made of us."
The retreat of the West from its colonies in the East may well be said to be thesingular most important event of the 20th century.
This piece it is also intended to make a plea to right a great wrong done to Japan. In
other words, to call on Asian countries to shun looking at Japan as an aggressor with8

criminal intent to plunder and loot other Asian countries a line pushed by massive
western propaganda but to look at Japan as the real spark that ignited the fight all over
Asia for independence from western domination. The time has come for fellow Asians
who have benefited from Japan's massive war effort and the blood sacrifices of Japanesesoldiers to concede due acknowledgement to Japan.
To single out Japan for war crimes selectively while avoiding any mention of the crimes
committed by western countries in third-world countries including calling forreparations which both Germany and Japan have paid, is anything but a travesty ofjustice.
What is surprising and morally repugnant today is the unrepentant nostalgia for western
hegemony that has not only gripped many prominent Anglo-American leaders andopinion-makers but also several servile Asian politicians, NGOs and columnists writing
as cheer leaders of neo–colonialism, who strive to see Asia through the narrow angle ofprotecting western colonial interests, leaving unexamined the historical memory and thecollective experiences of Asian peoples during the dark period of western colonial rule.
Colonialism and foreign occupation constitute crimes against humanity. They represent
some of the most serious violations of national sovereignty of states and breach ofinternational law, and in almost all colonial territories in Asia, Africa, North and SouthAmerica horrendous crimes against humanity have been committed by the occupyingcolonial powers. The perpetrators have yet to be held accountable and brought to bookunder international law for these genocidal crimes.
De-colonise Asian minds and show gratitude to JapanThe challenge before fellow Asians is to de-colonise our minds and look at Japan's
conduct before and during the Second World War afresh. Though Japan eventually lost
the war its military effort was not in vain. It substantially weakened and demoralised thewestern countries then in occupation of large tracts of Asia, such as Britain, France,
Netherlands, Portugal and the US, that they were forced to quit Asia in next to no time.
It is political correctness and revelations of Japan’s conduct in war-related atrocities
during the Second World War that prevent Japan from being given due credit for its
unique contribution towards hastening the liberation of Asia from western colonial rule.

9Tragically today the legacy of Japan’s heroic contributions and sacrifices as the first
Asian country that stood up and fought to drive out European colonialism from Asia inthe 20th century, is seldom acknowledged, rarely celebrated, and hardly observed as aform of thanksgiving.
It is never too late to show Asia’s gratitude to Japan and re-write the historical narrative.

Senaka Weeraratna

10

ABOUT THE EDITORThe Editor, Senaka Weeraratna is an Attorney at Law. He had his earlyeducation at Royal Primary School and Royal College, Colombo.
He obtained his law degree (LL.B.) from the University of Colombo Law
Faculty from where he also emerged as a popular undergraduate student
leader in the early 1970s. He won a string of students’ union elections,becoming initially the Secretary and in the succeeding year the Presidentof the Law Faculty Students’ Union, and subsequently he was elected byhis peers in the other Faculties as the Vice - President of the Colombo
University Students’ Council (1972).
Upon admission to the Supreme Court as an Attorney - at - Law,
Weeraratna proceeded to Australia for his post - graduate studies at Monash
University where he read for his Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree. He has thedistinction of authoring the first legal thesis on foreign investment in Sri
Lanka, which he presented as his minor dissertation for his LL.M. degree at Monash University. It has
since been published as a Book.
Weeraratna has further acquired a Diploma (Buddhist Studies) and Master of Arts (Buddhist
Studies) from the Post – Graduate Institute of Pali and Buddhist Studies, University of Kelaniya. He
has been admitted as a Barrister and Solicitor to the Supreme Courts of Victoria, and the Northern
Territory.
He has held a series of appointments in Australia, where he spent nearly 20 years working in suchcapacities as Lecturer in law, Legal Officer (Australian Federal Special Prosecutor’s Office), and Solicitor
in a reputed Melbourne law firm.
On his return to Sri Lanka, Weeraratna served as an Honorary Legal Consultant on Animal Welfare
Legislation to the Law Commission of Sri Lanka (2000 – 2006). He played a pivotal role in steering
the drafting of the Animal Welfare Bill at the Law Commission. He has also served as Acting Director(Research) at the Government Peace Secretariat and Consultant to the Telecommunications Regulatory
Commission of Sri Lanka (TRCSL).
He was a key litigant in the Noise Pollution case which resulted in a landmark judgment of theSupreme Court of Sri Lanka (2007) protecting the environment by imposing drastic restrictions on useof sound amplifiers in the public arena.
One of Senaka Weeraratna’s most outstanding contributions has been in influencing radical change
in the basic laws of cricket adjudication through a series of publications in some of world’s leading
newspapers and international cricket journals, calling for use of the Player Referral concept which heconceived and publicized worldwide finally leading to his innovation becoming accepted and used as
the lynchpin of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS) in international cricket.
He is the Hony. Secretary and Trustee of the German Dharmaduta Society and Chapter Leader ofthe Dharma Voices for Animals, Colombo, Sri Lanka Chapter.
He is a regular contributor to newspapers and journals on a variety of topics including Global
Buddhism, Animal Rights and Colonialism.