The Bulletin of the Graduate School of Josai International University Vol. 26, March 2023, 67－88〈Research Article〉

Hypotheses on the Textual Transmission of
Plato’s Euthydemus
Akitsugu Taki

Abstract

A sample collation of all the extant manuscripts of Plato's Euthydemus suggests a hypothesis on its
textual transmission that a hypothetical archetype in the Byzantine age descends bifurcately to codex
Bodleianus, E.D. Clarke 39 (B) and through a hypothetical sub-archetype to codex Venetus app. class.
IV, 1 (T) and codex Vindobonensis suppl. gr. 7 (W) and that each of these primary sources descends
to the others and, through codex Venetus gr. 186 with corrections from some other sources, to Ficinus'translation and the early modern printed editions in the 16th century.
Key words: Plato, the Euthydemus, textual transmission, medieval Greek manuscripts
4

1. Manuscripts of the Euthydemus (with my sigla in the round bracket)
Direct Transmission: (1) Malatestianus Plut. XXVIII, 4, saec. XIV? (M); (2) Escorialensis Y. 1. 13,
saec. XIII-XIV (Sc); (3) Laurentianus, Plut. 59.1, saec. XIV (a); (4) Laurentianus, Plut. 85.6, saec. XIII
(L85.6); (5) Laurentianus, Plut. 85.9, saec. XV (c); (6) Conventi Soppressi 180, saec. XV (CS180); (7)Neapolitanus gr. 337, saec. XIII (N); (8) Bodleianus, E.D. Clarke 39, 895 CE. (B); (9) Parisinus gr. 1808,
saec. XIII (Pa08); (10) Parisinus gr. 1809, saec. XV (Pa09); (11) Parisinus gr. 1811, saec. XIV (Pa11); (12)Coislianus 155, saec. XIV (Γ); (13) Lobcovicianus VI. F. a. 1, saec. XIV (L); (14) Angelicus gr. 107,
saec. XIV (Ang); (15) Barberinianus gr. 270, saec. XV (Barb); (16) Palatinus gr. 175, 1442-57 CE (Pal);(17) Rossianus gr. 17, saec. XVI (Ross); Urbinatus gr. 31, saec. XV-XVI (U31); (19) Urbinatus gr. 32,
1444 CE (273a1-273a6) (U32); (20) Vaticanus gr. 225-226, saec. XIII (V); (21) Vaticanus gr. 1029, saec.
XIV (R); (22) Vaticanus gr. 1030, saec. XIV-XV (s); (23) Vaticanus gr. 2196, saec. XIV-XV (V2196); (24)
Venetus gr. 184, saec. XV (Ξ); (25) Venetus gr. 186, saec. XV (V186); (26) Venetus gr. 189, saec. XIV (S);(27) Venetus app. class. IV, 1, saec. X (T); (28) Vindobonensis suppl. gr. 7, saec. XI (W).
Indirect Transmission: Demetrius Phalereus, de elocutione (226: 271a1-2; 271a4-5): Parisinus gr.
1656, saec. XV (Pa1656); Laurentianus Plut. 59.11, saec. XV (L59.11).
－ 67 －

2. A Review of the Previous Collations of the Medieval Manuscripts of the Euthydemus
Among the 15th to 16th century major editors and translators there is found hardly any manner ofidentifying for the readers the manuscripts they collate for their edition of Plato's works (Ficinus (tr.)(1484)); editio Aldina (1513) (Ald); editio Basileensis prima (1534) (Ba01); editio Basileensis secunda(1556) (Ba02); editio Stephanea (1578) (St)).
On the authority of the editorial work there, however, the editors of the Zweibrücken edition (Societas
Bipontina (1872: 351-355)) cites in their variae lectiones to the text of the Euthydemus the readings
there, not in the medieval manuscripts.
In addition to those authorities, Routh cites on the text of the Euthydemus readings in Cornarius' notes(Cornalius (1561)), although he cites on the text of the Gorgius the two medieval manuscripts, one,Parisinus gr. 1808 and the other, one in the Bodlean library, not the oldest of Plato's manuscripts, MSS
Clarke 39, made in 895 and acquired by E.D. Clarke (1769-1822)1 (Routh (1784: i-xix; 303-358); see
Stallbaum's register ‘Bodleianus' without referring to Routh's authority (Stallbaum (1824: [iii])).
Heindorf in his 1806 edition cites in his notes the readings in Parisinus gr. 1808 as reported in Routhin addition to the readings in those above-mentioned 15th and 16th works and Routh (Heindorf (1806)).
Stallbaum in his 1821 edition of the Euthydemus (Stallbaum (1821); id. (1824)) avails himself of therecent collation of eight manuscripts (the sigla mine here and below): B; W; a; L85.6; c; CS180; Pa08; Pal.
Whether or not he collates them is not clarified there (Stallbaum (1821: 67); id. (1824)) but the collation
is probably not his own but others', the Bodleian (B), Gaisford's, the Vienna (W) and Parisian (Pa18),
Bastio's, the Florentine (a; L85.6; c), de Furia's, the Palatian (Pal), Creuzer's (Gaisford (1820); Stallbaum(1857: 217); id. (1840a: 37); id. (1840b: 56); Wohlrab (1891: 48-49)).
Bekker in his 1826 edition of the Euthydemus (Bekker (1826)) cites thirteen manuscripts he and someothers collate (Wohlrab (1891: 48-49)): B; Γ; V; S; Ξ; Pa08; Pa09; Pa11; Ang; Barb; Pal; U31.
Ast in his 1827 edition cites in his apparatus criticus the readings recorded in the previous printed
editions without clarifying their sources (Ast (1827); for his manner in the apparatus criticus, see id.
(1819: Praefatio, v-vi)).
Winckelmann in his 1833 edition cites in his notes the variant readings that the previous editors,
Bekker and Stallbaum, report in their apparatus critici as well as those in the above-mentioned 16thcentury editions and Ficinus' translation (Winckelmann (1833: vii-xvi)). So do Baiter, Orelli andWinckelmann in their apparatus criticus of their 1839 edition (Baiter, Orelli and Winckelmann (1839:
Praefatio).
Stallbaum in his 1836 edition of the Euthydemus (Stallbaum (1836)) avails himself of the recent
collation of eighteen manuscripts: B; Γ; V; R; S; Ξ; Pa08; Pa09; Pa11; Ang; Barb; Pal; U31; W; a; L85.6; c;CS180 (Stallbaum (1836: 57). The collation is not his own, but Bekker's, de Furia's, Bast's and some－ 68 －

others' (Stallbaum (1857: 217); id. (1840: 56); Wohlrab (1891: 48-49)).
Hermann in his 1851 edition cites in his notes the readings in the texts of Stephanus, Bekker,
Stallbaum and the Zurich editors (Hermann (1851: vol. 3, Praefatio, viii-xii; vol. 1, Praefatio, vi)).
Hirschig in his 1856 edition does not collate any manuscripts by himself but edits his texts bycomparing the previous editors' apparatus critici and notes (Hirschig (1856: v-vii; xiv-xv)) .
Nor does Badham in his 1865 edition collate any manuscripts but discusses the readings and notes in
the previous editions (Badham (1865: iii-liv)).
By his own and some others' collation Schanz in his 1872 edition hypothesizes on the basis of his
studies on the textual interrelations of Plato's manuscripts that the archetype can be reconstructed as asource of the two pairs of close texts: B and V; W and R (Schanz (1872: v-xiv); for Schanz’ later study
on Venetus append. class. IV, 1 (T) as a second archetype, see id. (1877)). Therefore he cites in his
apparatus criticus three manuscripts: B, W and V.
Burnet in his 1903 edition, citing three manuscripts: B, T and W, newly inspects the Bodleianmanuscript for the identification of the corrector's readings but avails himself of J. Král's collation of theVienna manuscript (Král (1892)) and Scahnz's collation of T (Burnet ([1903]: Praefatio)).
Gifford in his 1905 edition avails himself of Schanz's and Burnet's apparatus critici without any new
collation except his inspection of the photocopy of the Bodleian manuscript (Gifford (1905: Preface)).
Ramb in his 1924 edition does not argue on the textual transmission but cites in his apparatus criticus
minimally some modern editors' or manuscripts' agreed-on readings (Ramb (1924: 375-377)).
Méridier in his 1931 edition cites without any argument on the textual transmission or the previous
collation three manuscripts: B; T; W (Méridier (1931: 143)).
The textual transmission has not been so problematic as to concern studies on the Euthydemus (e.g.
Sprague (1962: xi-xv); id. (1965: viii); Keulen (1971: 1-5); Hawtrey (1981: viii-ix); Chance (1992:1-15)).

The clarification of the textual transmission of the Euthydemus is almost complete because of
Schanz's contribution based mainly on his own independent collation but still not entirely, at least as
proof of ‘recentiores, deteriores'.

3. Hypotheses on the Textual Interelations among the Manuscripts in the Direct Transmission
The sample collation below suggests a hypothesis on the textual interrelations of the extant
manuscripts in the direct transmission that the manuscripts in the direct transmission consist of threegroups in textual closeness, each derived from a sub-archetype, B, T or W;2 and that T and W descendfrom a hypothetical common ancestor against B.3
Further hypotheses on the secondary sources are as follows.
－ 69 －

The B group descends from B through V to U32.4
The W group descends from W through L to R.5
The T group consists of three independent subgroups, all descending from T: (V2196 U31); Γ; thePa08 subgroup.6 The Pa08 subgroup is complex. It consists of five independent further subgroups, alldescending from Pa08: Ang; M; (Barb Pa09); the a subgroup; the Sc subgroup.7
The a subgroup under Pa08 descends from a to four independent further subgroups: Ross; (CS180 Pal);(c S); (V186 Ξ).8
The Sc subgroup under Pa08 descends from Sc to three independent subgroups: L85.6; N337; (Pa11 s).9
Ficinus in his translation would have inspected V186.10
The four earliest modern printed editions, Ald, Ba01, Ba02 and St, are derived from V186, not Ξ (271c1
δὲ post ποδαποί habent V186pc Ξ Ald Ba01 Ba02 St; 273d2 βλέψαντε Ξ: βλέψαντες CS180 c S V186
Ald Ba01 Ba02 St).11

4. stemma codicum
For stemma codicum, see Fig. 1.

5. My Method of Recording the Variants in the Direct and Indirect Transmission of the Euthydemus
I record variants in the method chosen in Taki (2022).
In the entry of the variants I describe I arrange the manuscripts in the indirect transmission before
those in the direct transmission. Among the latter I arrange the manuscripts in the following ordering
according to the hypothesis above: B V U32 T V2196 U31 Γ Pa08 Ang M Barb Pa09 a Ross CS180 Pal c S V186
Ξ Sc L85.6 N337 Pa11 s W L R.

Notes:
1

It is conjectured that Clarke found and acquired ‘Patmos Plato’ at St. John's Monastery, Patmos, on theafternoon of 9th October 1801 (Clarke (1814: 340-349); Clarke's letter to Otter, dated 25th October, Otter(1827: 345); and after his return to England, Richard Porson inspected it in 1802 (Clarke (1814: 348-349; n.
2 at 348); Otter (1827: 391)) and Clarke's collection of manuscripts was acquired by the Bodleian Library in
November 1808 (Otter (1827: 391-392)).

2

The variants for the independence of each group are as follows: (B V U32): 271a2 ἦ : ἧι / ᾗ / ἧ; 271a4κατεῖδον] κατίδον; 271a4 ξένος τις: ξένός τις; 271a7 δύ΄: δύο; 271b4 σκληφρός] σκληφρὸς:σκλῆφρος; 271b6 ὁ δὲ: ὃς δὲ; 271b7 παρ΄ἐμὲ: παρέμενε; 271d2 ἔστι post πάντων; 272b1 αἰεὶ:－ 70 －

－ 71 －

Fig. 1. stemma codicum (Akitsugu Taki)ἀεὶ; 272b10 δὲ post πέρυσιν; 272c1 αὖ: αὐτὸς; 272d1 καὶ σύ τι που / καὶ σύ τοι που: καί συ τίπου; 272e2 εἶδες / εἴδες: ἴδες; 272e3 δέ μου: δ΄ ἐμοῦ; 273a2 αὖ post ἅμα; 273a2 δοκεὶν: δοκεῖ;273b3 ἰδόντε: ἰδόντες; 273b7 ὁ prior; (W L R): 271a2 ὄχλος; 272a7 μηδ΄ἂν] μὴδὲν; 272c4 μοι: μου /μοῦ; 272c5 τούτοιν post ξένοιν; 272c8 μοι: μου; 273b3 διονυσόδωρος] διονυσιόδωρος; (T V2196
U31 Γ Pa08 Ang M Barb Pa09 a Ross CS180 Pal c S V186 Ξ Sc L85.6 N337 Pa11 s): 271c6 τώ γε: ὡς ἐγωγε;271c8 ἐγενέσθην post ἀκαρνᾶνε / ἀκρανᾶνε: 272d2 ἄξομεν: ἕξομεν; 273b5 αὐτοῖν προσεῖχον:προσεῖχον αὐτοῖν; 273b7 ἐμὲ: με; 273b7 ἐξ ἀριστερᾶς: ἐν ἀριστερᾶι / ἐν ἀριστερᾶ / ἐπ΄ ἀριστρᾶ.
3The variants for the hypothetical ancestor common to T and W against B are as follows: (B: T W) numerus
operis: S: B; κα: T W; 271b4 scholion ad σκληφρός: οὕτω λέγεσθαι … τὸ σῶμα B: σκληφρὸς ὁτῶι μὲν χρόνωι … πρεσβύτερος. T W; 272b10 δὲ post πέρυσιν non habet B: habent T W; 273a2
αὖ post ἅμα habet B: non habent T W; (T W: B) 271d2 ἔστι post πάντων habent T W: non habet B;
273b7 ὁ pr. habent T W: non habet B; (B T: W) 271a2 ὄχλος non habet W; the use of B in W: 271c8ἐγενέσθην post ἀκαρνᾶνε habent B W: non habet T; 273b5 αὐτοῖν προσεῖχον Β W: προσεῖχοναὐτοῖν Τ.

4(B: V U32): 271b6: ὃν: ὧν; 271c5 θαυμασία: θαυμασίαν; 271c8 ἀκαρνᾶνε: ἀκρανᾶνε; 272b5 φοβεῖ:φοβοῖ; 272c4 κόννον: κόνον; 273b2 καὶ om.; (B V: U32): 271a2 ὑμᾶς: ἡμᾶς; 272c3 κιθαρίζειν:κιθαρίξειν; 272e3 ἀναστῆναι: ἀποστῆναι.

5(W L: R): 271c3 ἀπώικησαν: ἀπώκησαν; 272b10 προπέρυσιν: προπέρυσι; (R: W L) 271d2
δεινοτάτω: δεινότατωι; 272a7 ἀντᾶραι: ἀντάραι; 273a1 διονυσόδωρος: διονυσιόδωρος; (W: L R)
271c1 ποδαποί: ποδαπὴ; 271c3 ἐς] εἰς; 273b7 ἐν ἀριστερᾶι: ἐπ΄ ἀριστρᾶ; (W L: R) 271a6 ἦν postεἷς; 271c6 τώ γε: τώ δε; 272b3 ἂν om. R; see also 271b8 signum interrogandi post μετέχει δὲ ...
λόγων; 272a5 μόνον: μόνω.

6((T V2196 U31 Γ) : (Pa08 Ang M Barb Pa09 a Ross CS180 Pal c S V186 Ξ Sc L85.6 N337 Pa11 s)): 271a2 ὑμᾶς:ἡμᾶς; 271b3 διαφέρειν: διαφέρει; 271c2 τὸ μὲν: μὲν τὸ; 272a6 ταύτην: ταύτη; (T: V2196 U31): 271b1
ἀξιόχου: ἀξιομάχου; 271b9 αὖ: οὖν; 271c1 ποδαποί: ποταποὶ; 271c3 ἀπώικησαν: ἀπώκισαν; 271c6ἀτεχνῶς τώ γε / τώ δε / ὡς ἐγωγε: ὡς ἐγωγε ἀτεχνῶς; 271d1 μόνον: μόνω; 272a2 κρατίστω:κρατείσθω; 272a5 ἣ γὰρ ἦν λοιπὴ αὐτοῖν μάχη: ἣ γὰρ ἔτι λοιπὴ αὐτοῖν ἦν μάχη: ἣ γὰρ ἔτιλοιπὴ μάχη αὐτοῖν ἦν; 272c6 ταὐτὸ τοῦτο: ταυτὸ τοῦτο: ταυτὸ τοῦτ΄; 272e2 εἶδες: εἴδες; 273a3εἰσελθόντε: εἰσελθόντες; 273a3 καὶ post περιεπατείτην; 273a4 δύ΄] δύο; 273a4 περιεληλυθότε]περιεληλυθότες; 273a7 κτήσιππος νεανίσκος τις] κτήσιππός τις νεανίσκος; 273b3 ὁ; (T V2196:
U31): 271c4 τούσδε: τοὺς δὲ; 272b9 ἠρξάσθην] ἠρξάστην; 272c7 προσδέξασθαι: ποσδέξασθαι;anomalies in T: 271a1 ὧι / ὧ: ὥι B T; 271a1 χθὲς: χθές: χθες T; 271c5 θαυμασία V2196 U31 Γ: θαυμασι΄
Tpc(puncto notavit): θαυμάσίαι Tac; 271c6 πάσσοφοι Tac: πάνσοφοι B Tpc W; 272a7 ἀντᾶραι:ἀντάραι: ἀντᾶιραι T; 273a8 μὴ post ὅσον habent Tpc Γ: μὲν habent V2196 U31: nullum habet Tac.

7(Ang): 271c4 ἔτη; 272c7 με: μὲν; 272c8 φοιτᾶν] φοιταῖν: φοιτᾷν; 273a8 μὴ post ὅσον; (Pa08: Ang):－ 72 －

271d1 οἵω: οἴω; 272b5 τί δὲ: τί δαὶ; 273a1 καὶ ὁ διονσόδωρος: καὶ ονυσόδωρος; (Pa08: M): 272b1
αἰεὶ: ἀεὶ; 272b5 τί δὲ: τί δαὶ; 272c7 με: μὲν; 272d2 αὐτοῖς ἄξομεν / ἕξομεν: ἄξομεν αὐτοῖς; (Pa08:
Barb Pa09): 271c1 ποδαποί: ποταποὶ; (Pa08 Pa09: Barb): 272a5 ἣ γὰρ ἦν λοιπὴ αὐτοῖν μάχη: ἣ γὰρἔτι λοιπὴ αὐτοῖν ἦν μάχη; 271b4 scholion ad σκληφρός; 272b1 ὁμοίως; (a Ross CS180 Pal c S V186
Ξ): 271c6 οὐδ΄: οὐκ; 272d2 αὐτοῖς ἄξομεν / ἕξομεν: ἄξομεν αὐτοῖς; (Sc L85.6 N337 Pa11 s): 271b2
ἐπιδεδωκέναι: ἐπιδεδηλωκέναι; 271c4 ἔτη; 272c7 με: μὲν; 273a8 μὴ: μὲν.
8

(a: Ross): 271b4 scholion ad σκληφρός; 272a5 ἣ γὰρ ἦν λοιπὴ αὐτοῖν μάχη: ἣ γὰρ ἔτι λοιπὴαὐτοῖν ἦν μάχη; (a: Ross): 271b1 ὑμῶν: ἡμῶν; 271b4 καλὸς] καλλὸς; 271c6 ἠίδη / ἤδη / ᾔδειν /ἤδειν : ἤδην; 271c7 γάρ ἐστον: ἐστὼν; 272a7 ἕνα: ἕνεκα; 272c2 περιάψω: περιάγω; 272d6 εἰδῶ:ἰδῶ; 272e2 εἶδες / εἴδες / ἴδες: οἷδες; 273a1 τ΄ εὐθύδημος: τε εὐθύδημος; 273a8 τὴν φύσιν: τῆφύσει; 273b1 οὖν: δέ; (a: CS180 Pal): 271a2 ἦ: ἧι / ᾗ / ἧ; 271a4 ξένος τίς: ξένος τὶς; 271b3 τὴνἡλικίαν; 272a1 ἂν post ὂς; 272a5 ἐπιτεθήκατον: ἐπιτεθείκατον: ἐπιτεθείκασι; (a CS180: Pal):
271a4 ὧι / ᾧ / ὧ: ὦ Pal; 271b4 σκληφρός / σκληφρὸς / σκλῆφρος: σκληφὸς Pal; 271d2 ἧι / ᾗ / ἧ :ἦ; 272b2 ὦ: ὁ; 272c1 τοῖν: τὴν; 273a3 εἰσελθόντε: εἰσελθόντες; (a: c S): 271a2 ἦ: ἧι: ἧ; 272d6 ὅτι: ὅ
τι; 273b3 φῆις / φηὶς / φῆς / φὴς: φής; (a c: S): 271d1 μόνον: μόνω; 272a7 μηδ΄ἂν / μὴδὲν ἂν ἕνααὐτοῖς οἷόν τ’ εἶναι; 272c6 ταὐτὸ τοῦτο / ταυτὸ τοῦτο / ταυτὸ τοῦτ΄: αὖτὸ τοῦτο; (a V186 Ξ): 271b4
scholion ad σκληφρός; see also: 273e5 ἐπεδημησάτην Pa08pc(i.m. γρ. μησάτην) apc(i.m. eodem
atramento δημησάτην scrips.) cpc(eodem atramento s.l. ησάτην scrips.) S(eodem atramento s.l.
ησάτην scrips.) V186pc(altero atramento eadem manu s.l. δημησάτην scrips.): ἐπεδημείτην Pa08 aac
Ross CS180 Pal cac S V186ac Ξ; (a: V186 Ξ): 272b6 sign.i. post τί δὲ / δαὶ ... οὐ φοβῇ / φοβεῖ ... ᾖς / ἦις /ἦς; the variants from another source in V186 and their transmission to Ξ: 271a2 ἦ: ἧι: ἧ; 271a2 ὑμᾶς: ἡμᾶς;
271c1 δὲ post ποδαποί; 271c5 θαυμασία: θαυμασι΄ : θαυμάσίαι; 271c6 οὐδ΄: οὐκ; 272c7 με: μὲν; cf.
omissions in V186ac: 271b3 τὴν ἡλικίαν; 272e3 τὸ.

9(Sc: L85.6 N337 Pa11 s): 271c3 ἀπώικησαν / ἀπῴκησαν: ἀπώκησαν: ἀπώκισαν; 272c5 καλοῦσι:καλεῖσθαι; 271b4 scholion ad σκληφρός; (Sc: L85.6) 273b1 νέος: νέοι; (Sc: N337) 272a7 αὐτοῖς] αὐτοῦ;272a8 ἐξελέγχειν] ἐξελέχειν; 272b10 πέρυσιν / πέρυσι ] περίσυ; (Sc: Pa11 s) 271a3 οὐδὲν] οὐδενὸς;
272a5 ἐπιτεθήκατον: ἐπιτεθείκατον: ἐπιτεθείκασι; 272b1 αἰεὶ: ἀεὶ; 272b1 ὁμοίως; (Sc Pa11: s) 271c7
τούτω: τοῦτο; 272b5 μὴ ἤδη: μὴ δὲ ἤδη; 272b8 μὴ; 272d2 υἱεῖς: ὑλεῖς.

10271a2; 271b2; 271b3; 271c4; 271c8; 272a6; 272c7; 272c8; 273a7; 273a8; 273b7.

11271a2; 271b2; 271c1; 271c6; 272b1; 272c7; 272d2; 273a8.

Bibliography
Ast, F. (1819) Platonis quae extant opera, t.1, Lipsiae.
---- (1827) Platonis quae extant opera, t. 9, Lipsiae.
－ 73 －

Badham, C. (1865) Platonis Euthydemus et Laches, London.
Baiter, J.G., Orelli, J.C. and Winckelmann, A.G. (1839) Platonis opera quae feruntur omnia, Turici.
Bekker, I. (1826) Platonis … scripta graece omnia …, vol. iv, London.
Burnet, J. [1903] Platonis opera, t. 3, Oxford.
Chance, T.H. (1992) Plato's Euthydemus: Analysis of What Is and Is Not Philosophy, Berkeley.
Clarke, E.D. (1814) Travels in Various Countries of Europe Asia Africa, part 2, sect. 2, London.
Cornalius, I. (1561) Eclogae decem, in: id. (1561) Platonis Atheniensis … opera, quae ad nos extant omnia,
Basileae.
editio Aldina: Aldus Manutius et Marcus Musurus (1513) ΑΠΑΝΤΑ ΤΑ ΤΟΥ ΠΛΑΤΩΝΟΣ Omnia Platonis
Opera, Venice, 1513.
editio Basileensis prima: Grynaeus, Simon (1534) ΑΠΑΝΤΑ ΠΛΑΤΩΝΟΣ ΜΕΘ’ ΥΠΟΜΝΗΜΑΤΑ ΠΡΟΚΛΟΥ
... Platonis Omnia Opera cum commentariis Procli ...Basel.
editio Basileensis secunda: Hopperus, Marcus (1556) ΑΠΑΝΤΑ ΠΛΑΤΩΝΟΣ ... Platonis Omnia Opera, Basel.
editio Stephanea: Serranus, I. and Stephanus, H. (1578) ΠΛΑΤΩΝΟΣ ΑΠΑΝΤΑ ΤΑ ΣΩΖΟΜΕΝΑ: Platonis
opera quae extant omnia, 3 t., Geneva.
Ficinus, M. (tr.) (1484) Plato, Opera (2 Inc.s.a. 988-1), Firenze, ca. 1484.05-1485.04 (Bayerische
Staatsbibliothek) (the first printed edition in 1484).
Gaisford, T. (1820) Lectiones Platonicae e membranis Bodleianis, Oxford.
Gifford, E.H. (1905) The Euthydemus of Plato, Oxford.
Hawtrey, R.S.W. (1981) Commentary of Plato's Euthydemus, Philaselphia.
Heindorf, L.F. (1806) Platonis dialogi selecti: Cratylus, Parmenides, Euthydemus, Berlin.
Hermann, C.F. (1851) Platonis Dialogi, 5 vols., Lipsiae.
Hirschig, R.B. (1856) Platonis opera, t. 1, Paris.
Keulen, H. (1971) Untersuchungen zu Platons Euthydem, Wiesbaden.
Král, J. (1892) ‘Über den Platocodex der Wiener Hofbibliothek suppl. phil. gr. 7’, Wiener Studien, 14 (1892)
161-208.
Méridier, L. (1931) Platon, Oeuvres complètes, t. 5, pt. 1: Ion, Ménexène, Euthydème, Paris.
Otter, W. (1827) The Life and Remains of Edward Daniel Clarke, New York.
Ramb, W.R.M. (1924) Plato with an English Translation, vol. 4, Laches, Protagoras, Meno, Euthydemus,
Cambridge, MA.
Routh, M.J. (1784) Platonis Euthydemus et Gorgias, Oxford.
Schanz, M. (1872) Platonis Euthydemus, Wirceburgi.
---- (1877) Über den Platocodex der Markusbibliothek in Venedig Append. Class. IV Nr. 1 den Archetypus derzweiten Handschriftenfamilie, Leipzig.
Societas Bipontina (1872) ΠΛΑΤΩΝ Platonis philosophi quae extant, tom. 3, Biponti.
－ 74 －

Sprague, R.K. (1962) Plato's Use of Fallacy: A Study of the Euthydemus and Some Other Dialogues, New York.
---- (tr.) (1965) Euthydemus, Plato, Indianapolis.
Stallbaum, G. (1821) Platonis quae supersunt opera, t. 2, Lipsiae.
---- id. (1824) ‘variae lectiones in Euthydemum’, Platonis quae supersunt opera, t. 10, Lipsiae, 1-33.
---- (1836) Platonis opera omnia, vol. vi, sect. i, Gothae et Erfordiae.
---- (1840a) Platonis Protagoras, Gothae.
---- (1840b) Platonis opera omnia, vol. viii, sect. ii, continens Sophistam, Gothae.
---- (1857) Platonis opera omnia, vol. v, sect. i, 2nd ed., Gothae et Erfordiae.
Taki, A. (2022) ‘Hypotheses on the Textual Transmission of Plato's Menexenus', The Bulletin of the Graduate
School of Josai International University, 25 (2022) 39-76.
Winckelmann, A.G. (1833) Platonis Euthydemus, Lipsiae.
Wohlrab, M. (1891) Platonis opera omnia, vol. viii, sect. 1, continens Theaetetum, 2nd ed., Lipsiae.

Varia inter codices in Platonis Euthydemum, 271a1-273b8
numerus operis: S: B; κα: T Γ Pa08 M Ξ Sc L85.6(altero atramento i.m.) W L; Κ: Γ aac; ΚΒ apc(i.m.); ε:
V; κζ: Pa11(eodem atramento λόγος εἰκοστὸς ἕβδομος i.m. scrips.) s; non habent cett.
titulus: εὐθύδημος Β T cett. Sextus Empiricus, Adversus mathematicos, 7.14 Demetrius, deelocutione, 226.3 Alcinous, Didaskalikos, 6.9.2 Simplicius, In Aristotelis categorias commentarium,
8.22.11 Michael, In Aristotelis sophisticos elenchos commentarius, 2.20 πλάτωνος εὐθύδημος W
non habet U32
subtitulus: ἢ ἐριστικός B T W cett. non habent U32 U31
epitheta: ἀνατρεπτικός B V Ξ non habent cett.
271a1 ΚΡ. Τίς ἦν, ὦ Σώκρατες, ᾧ χθὲς ἐν Λυκείῳ διελέγου;τίς B T U31pc(τ i.m. altera manu add.) cett.: ις U32 U31ac(littera initiali omissa) Barb(littera initiali
omissa) V186(littera initiali omissa) L85.6(littera initiali omissa) R(littera initiali omissa)ὧι Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) a(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W L ᾧ Pa1656 ὧ cett. ὥι B T (haecvaria absunt in Méridier et Burnet)χθὲς Pa1656 L59.11 B W cett. χθές Ross χθες T nequit legi Scλυκείωι B T Pa08 M Barb(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) L λυκείῳ a λυκείω W cett. λυκίωPa1656 L59.11
271a2 ἦ πολὺς ὑμᾶς ὄχλος περιειστήκει, ὥστ’ ἔγωγε βουλόμενοςἦ Pa1656 L59.11 Βpc(unam litteram erasit et altero atramento eta fecit) V U32 CS180 Pal V186 Ξ R Ficinus,－ 75 －

qui vertit nempe Ald Ba01 Ba02 St ἧι Bac(ut videtur) T Pa08 a(iota adscripto) W ᾗ M Pa09 ἧ V2196 U31
Γ Ang Barb a Ross c S L85.6 N337 Pa11 s L nequit legi Sc (varia atramenti in B absunt in Burnet etMéridier)ὑμᾶς B V T V2196 U31 Γ V186pc(altero atramento υ inposito) Ξ W L R: ἡμᾶς Pa1656 L59.11 U32 Pa08 cet﻿t.
ὄχλος habent Pa1656 L59.11 B T cett.: non habent W L R (haec omissio abest in Burnet et Méridier)
271a3 ἀκούειν προσελθὼν οὐδὲν οἷός τ’ ἦ ἀκοῦσαι σαφές· ὑπερκύψας
οὐδὲν] οὐδενὸς Pa11 s
ἦ] ἦν B T W cett. nequit legi Sc (haec varia absunt in Burnet et Méridier)
271a4 μέντοι κατεῖδον, καί μοι ἔδοξεν εἶναι ξένος τις ᾧ διελέγου.
κατεῖδον T W cett. κατίδον B V U32 (lectio in W abest in Burnet)ξένος τις T V2196 ξὲνος τις U31 ξένός τις B V U32 Γ ξένος τίς L59.11 Pa08 cett. W L R ξένος τὶς Pa1656
CS180 Pal nequit legi Scὧι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) a(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W L ᾧ Pa1656 ὧ L59.11 cett. ὦ Pal
271a5 τίς ἦν;271a6 ΣΩ. Πότερον καὶ ἐρωτᾷς, ὦ Κρίτων; οὐ γὰρ εἷς ἀλλὰπότερον Hermann: ὁπότερον B T W cett. nequit legi Scἐρωτᾶις B T Pa08 a(iota adscripto) W ἑρωτᾶς cett.
sign.i. post κριτῶν interpunx. com.infr.c. V2196
ἦν post εἷς habet R
271a7 δύ’ ἤστην.
δύ΄ B V U32 δύο T W cett. (haec varia absunt in Burnet et Méridier)
271a8 ΚΡ. Ὃν μὲν ἐγὼ λέγω, ἐκ δεξιᾶς τρίτος ἀπὸ σοῦ καθῆστο·271b1 ἐν μέσῳ δ’ ὑμῶν τὸ Ἀξιόχου μειράκιον ἦν. καὶ μάλα πολύ,μέσωι B T μέσω W cett.
ὑμῶν cett. Rosspc(altero atramento puncto notavit et s.l. υ scrips.): ἡμῶν Rossacἀξιόχου B T W cett.: ἀξιομάχου V2196 U31
271b2 ὦ Σώκρατες, ἐπιδεδωκέναι μοι ἔδοξεν, καὶ τοῦ ἡμετέρου οὐ
－ 76 －

ἐπιδεδωκέναι Bpc(altero atramentoin ηλω inposuit) V U32 Tpc(tres litteras erasit et altero

atramento omega late scripsit) V2196 U31 Γpc(duabus litteris erasis) Pa08pc(eodem atramento delta
inposuit) Angpc(ηλ erasit et δω fecit) M Barb Pa09 a Ross CS180 Pal c S V186 Ξ L85.6pc(tribus litteriserasis et altero atramento ω inposito) Pa11pc(punctis δηλω notavit) Rac Ficinus, qui vertit profecisse
Ald Ba01 Ba02 St: ἐπιδεδηλωκέναι Bac Tac(ci) Pa08ac Angac Sc(ut videtur) L85.6ac(ci) N337 Pa11ac s W L
Rpc(eodem atramento parva littera extra lineam λω scrips.) (lectio in W abest in Burnet)
ἔδοξεν B T: ἔδοξε W cett.
271b3 πολύ τι τὴν ἡλικίαν διαφέρειν Κριτοβούλου. ἀλλ’ ἐκεῖνοςτὴν ἡλικίαν B T V186pc(altero atramento altera manu i.m. supplev.) W cett.: om. CS180 Pal V186ac
Ficinus, qui vertit equalis (cf. Serranus (St), qui vertit aetate ...non longe abest)διαφέρειν B T V2196 U31 Γ V186pc(altero atramento et altera manu ν s.l. scrips.) Ξ W L R: διαφέρειPa08 V186ac cett.
271b4 μὲν σκληφρός, οὗτος δὲ προφερὴς καὶ καλὸς καὶ ἀγαθὸς τὴνσκληφρός Barb Pa09 Ross c Sc L85.6 N337 s W R σκληφρὸς T V2196 U31 Γ Pa08 Ang M a CS180 S V186 ΞPa11 L σκλῆφρος B V U32 σκληφὸς Pal (incerte Méridier)καλὸς] καλλὸς Ross
scholion ad σκληφρός: οὕτω λέγεσθαι καὶ παρὰ ἀριστοτελεῖ ὃ ἰσχνὸς καὶ λεπτὸς τὸ σῶμα
B (eodem atramento eadem manu); σκληφρὸς ὁ τῶι μὲν χρόνωι πρεσβύτερος τῆι δὲ ὄψεινεώτερος δοκῶν, προφερὴς δὲ. ὁ τῶι μὲν χρόνωι νεώτερος, τῆι δὲ ὄψει πρεσβύτερος. T (alteramanu) Pa08(eodem atramento) Ang(eodem atramento eadem manu) M(eodem atramento
eadem manu) Pa09(eodem atramento eadem manu) a(eodem atramento eadem manu) c(eodem
atramento eadem manu) S(eodem atramento eadem manu) V186(altero atramento altera manu)Ξ(altero atramento eadem manu) Sc(altero atramento altera manu) N337(altero atramento alteramanu) Pa11(eodem atramento eadem manu) W(eodem atramento): scholion non habent V U32
V2196 Γ U31 Barb Ross CS180 Pal L85.6 s L Rτῶι T c(iota adscripto) W τῷ a τῶ Pa08 Ang M Pa09 S V186 Ξ Sc N337 Pa11χρόνωι T c(iota adscripto) W χρόνῳ a χρόνω Pa08 Ang M Pa09 S V186 Ξ Sc N337 Pa11
τῆι T Pa08 a(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W τῆ Ang M Pa09 S V186 Ξ Sc N337 Pa11
τῶι T c(iota adscripto) W τῷ a τῶ Pa08 Ang M Pa09 S V186 Ξ Sc N337 Pa11χρόνωι T c(iota adscripto) W χρόνῳ a χρόνω Pa08 Ang M Pa09 S V186 Ξ Sc N337 Pa11τῆι δὲ T Pa08 a(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W τῆ δὲ Ang M Pa09 S V186 Ξ Sc N337 Pa11

－ 77 －

271b5 ὄψιν.
271b6 ΣΩ. Εὐθύδημος οὗτός ἐστιν, ὦ Κρίτων, ὃν ἐρωτᾷς, ὁ δὲὃν B T W cett.: ὧν V U32 nequit legi Scἐρωτᾶις B T Pa08 W ἐρωτᾷς Ang a ἐρωτᾶς cett. nequit legi Scὁ δὲ T W cett.: ὃς δὲ B V U32
271b7 παρ’ ἐμὲ καθήμενος ἐξ ἀριστερᾶς ἀδελφὸς τούτου, Διονυσόπαρ΄ἐμὲ T W cett.: παρέμενε B V U32
271b8 δωρος· μετέχει δὲ καὶ οὗτος τῶν λόγων.
sign.i. post μετέχει δὲ ... λόγων interpunx. commate infra dicolon c S L(accentum in inferiore
linea in W pro commate forsitan habuit) R
271b9 ΚΡ. Οὐδέτερον γιγνώσκω, ὦ Σώκρατες. καινοί τινες αὖαὖ B T Γ W cett.: οὖν V2196 U31 nequit legi Sc
271c1 οὗτοι, ὡς ἔοικε, σοφισταί· ποδαποί; καὶ τίς ἡ σοφία;ποδαποί B T Γ Pa08 W cett.: ποταποὶ V2196 U31 Barb Pa09 ποδαπὴ L R
δὲ post ποδαποί non habent cett. c S V186ac: habent V186pc(altero atramento s.l. add.) Ξ Ald Ba01
Ba02 St271c2 ΣΩ. Οὗτοι τὸ μὲν γένος, ὡς ἐγᾦμαι, ἐντεῦθέν ποθέντὸ μὲν B V U32 T V2196 U31 Γ V186pc(μὲν delevit et altera manu altero atramento s.l. μὲν addidit) Ξ
W L R: μὲν τὸ Pa08 V186ac cett.
ἐγῶιμαι T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) Pa11(iota adscripto) W L ἐγᾦμαι Pa09 a CS180 c s R ἐγῶμαι B
V U32 cett.
271c3 εἰσιν ἐκ Χίου, ἀπῴκησαν δὲ ἐς Θουρίους, φεύγοντες δὲἀπώικησαν B T Pa08 Barb c(iota adscripto) W L ἀπῴκησαν Pa09 a ἀπώκησαν cett. ἀπώκισαν
V2196 U31 L85.6pc(altero atramento ι inposito) N337 Pa11 s
ἐς] εἰς L Rδὲ ἐκεῖθεν] δ΄ἐκεῖθεν Γ
271c4 ἐκεῖθεν πόλλ’ ἤδη ἔτη περὶ τούσδε τοὺς τόπους διατρίβουσιν.
－ 78 －

ἔτη habent B V U32 T V2196 U31 Pa08pc(ἔτη altero atramento s.l. scrips.) Angpc(ἔτη altero atramentos.l. scrips.) M Barb Pa09 a Ross CS180 Pal c S V186 Ξ L85.6pc(altero atramento s.l. ἔτη add.) W L R
Ficinus, qui vertit annos Ald Ba01 Ba02 St: non habent Pa08ac Angac Sc L85.6ac N337 Pa11 sτούσδε B T W cett.: τοὺς δὲ U31
271c5 ὃ δὲ σὺ ἐρωτᾷς τὴν σοφίαν αὐτοῖν, θαυμασία, ὦ Κρίτων·ἐρωτᾶις B T Pa08 W ἐρωτᾷς Ang a ἐρωτᾶς cett.
θαυμασία B V2196 U31 Γ Angpc(altero atramento s.l. α add.) Pal V186pc(altero atramento α s.l.
scrips.) Ξ L85.6pc(altero atramento altera manu α s.l. scrips.) W L R: θαυμασι΄ Tpc(puncto notavit)
Pa08 Angac M Barb Pa09 a Ross CS180 c S V186ac Sc L85.6ac N337 Pa11 s θαυμάσίαι Tac θαυμασίαν V U32
271c6 πάσσοφοι ἀτεχνῶς τώ γε, οὐδ’ ᾔδη πρὸ τοῦ ὅτι εἶεν οἱπάσσοφοι Tac Ang ac πάνσοφοι B V U 32 Tpc(eodem atramento s.l. nu scrips.) V 2196 U 31 Γ
Pa08pc(unam litteram erasit et altero atramneto ν inposuit) Angpc(σ erasit et altero atramento νfecit) W cett. (haec varia absunt in Burnet)
τώ γε B V U32 W L: ὡς ἐγωγε T Sc(ut videtur) cett. τώ δε Rἀτεχνῶς τώ γε / τώ δε / ὡς ἐγωγε B T Γ W cett.: ὡς ἐγωγε ἀτεχνῶς V2196 U31
οὐδ΄ cett. Pa08 Ang V186pc(altero atramento δ inposito) Ξ Ald Ba01 Ba02 St: οὐκ a Ross CS180 Pal c S
V186ac sἠίδη B ἤδη V U32 ηἴδειν T Pa08 c(iota adscripto) W L ᾔδειν V186 ἤδειν V2196 U31 Γ Ang cett. R ἤδηνRoss (haec varia absunt in Burnet et Méridier)271c7 παγκρατιασταί. τούτω γάρ ἐστον κομιδῇ παμμάχω. οὐ κατὰτούτω cet. Sc L85.6 N337 Pa11: τοῦτο sγάρ ἐστον] γὰρ ἐστὸν cett. Rosspc(altero atramento puncto notavit et s.l. ο scrips.) Pa11 L R γὰρἐστόν L85.6 N337 s W ἐστὼν Rossac nequit legi Scκομιδῆι B T Pa08 κομιδῆ cett.
271c8 τὼ Ἀκαρνᾶνε ἐγενέσθην τὼ παγκρατιαστὰ ἀδελφώ· ἐκείνω
ἀκαρνᾶνε B cett. ἀκρανᾶνε V U32
ἐγενέσθην post ἀκαρνᾶνε / ἀκρανᾶνε habent B V U32 W L R: non habent T cett. Ficinus
271d1 μὲν γὰρ τῷ σώματι μόνον οἵω τε μάχεσθαι, τούτω δὲ πρῶτοντῶι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) a(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W L τῶ cett. Rμόνον cett. T Γ: μόνω V2196 U31 S－ 79 －

οἵω] οἵῳ a οἴω Ang
δὲ cett. W Lac R: μὲν Lpc(δ eraso altero atramento μὲν scrips.)
271d2 μὲν τῷ σώματι δεινοτάτω ἐστὸν καὶ μάχῃ, ᾗ πάντων ἔστιτῶι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) a(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W L τῶ cett. Rδεινοτάτω B T cett. R: δεινότατωι W Lμάχηι T Pa08 W L μάχῃ R μάχη B cett.
ἧι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W ᾗ a ἧ cett. L R ἦ Palἔστι post πάντων habent T V2196 U31 S Sc W R ἐστὶ habent Γ Pa08 cett. L ἐστί habet Ross: non
habent B V U32
271d3 κρατεῖν—ἐν ὅπλοις γὰρ αὐτώ τε σοφὼ πάνυ μάχεσθαι καὶ272a1 ἄλλον, ὃς ἂν διδῷ μισθόν, οἵω τε ποιῆσαι—ἔπειτα τὴν ἐνὃς ἂν διδῶ altero atramento fecit V186pc
ἂν post ὂς habent cett. a Ross c: non habent CS180 Palδίδωι B T Pa08 δίδω cett.
οἵω] οἵῳ a
272a2 τοῖς δικαστηρίοις μάχην κρατίστω καὶ ἀγωνίσασθαι καὶκρατίστω] κρατείσθω V2196 U31
272a3 ἄλλον διδάξαι λέγειν τε καὶ συγγράφεσθαι λόγους οἵους
272a4 εἰς τὰ δικαστήρια. πρὸ τοῦ μὲν οὖν ταῦτα δεινὼ ἤστην
272a5 μόνον, νῦν δὲ τέλος ἐπιτεθήκατον παγκρατιαστικῇ τέχνῃ. ἣμόνον cett. Lpc(altero atramento sinistrum circum in omega nigravit et ν addidit) R: μόνω W
Lac (haec varia absunt in Burnet)
ἐπιτεθήκατον Ross: ἐπιτεθείκατον cett. Sc L85.6 N337 ἐπιτεθείκασι Pa11 s (haec varia absunt in
Burnet et Méridier)παγκρατιαστικῆι B T Pa08 c(iota adscripto) W παγκρατιαστικῇ a παγκρατιαστικῆ cett. L Rτέχνηι B T Pa08 c(iota adscripto) τέχνῃ a τέχνη cett.
ἣ γὰρ ἦν λοιπὴ αὐτοῖν μάχη B V U32 Tac Γ Pa08ac Angac Mac Barb Pa09ac aac Ross CS180 Pal cac Sac
V186ac Ξ Sc L85.6 N337ac Pa11 s W L R: ἣ γὰρ ἔτι λοιπὴ αὐτοῖν ἦν μάχη Tpc(i.m. γρ ἣ γὰρ ... ἦν－ 80 －

altero atramento altera manu) Pa08pc(i.m. γρ ἣ γὰρ ... ἦν eodem atramento eadem manu)
Angpc(i.m. γρ ἣ γὰρ ... ἦν eodem atramento eadem manu) Mpc(i.m. γρ ἣ γὰρ ... ἦν eodem
atramento eadem manu) Pa09pc(i.m. γρ ἣ γὰρ ... ἦν eodem atramento eadem manu) apc(i.m. γρἣ γὰρ ... ἦν eodem atramento eadem manu) cpc(i.m. γρ ἣ γὰρ ... ἦν eodem atramento eademmanu) Spc(i.m. γρ ἣ γὰρ ... ἦν eodem atramento eadem manu) V186pc(i.m. γρ ἣ γὰρ ... ἦν altero
atramento altera manu ) N337pc(i.m. γρ ἣ γὰρ ... ἦν altero atramento altera manu ) ἣ γὰρ ἔτιλοιπὴ μάχη αὐτοῖν ἦν V2196 U31
272a6 γὰρ ἦν λοιπὴ αὐτοῖν μάχη ἀργός, ταύτην νῦν ἐξείργασθον,ταύτην B V U32 T V2196 U31 Γ L85.6(s.l. ην scrips.) V186pc(eodem atramento ν s.l. add.) Ξpc(eodem
atramento eadem manu ν s.l. add.) W L R: ταύτη Pa08(haplographia) V186ac Ξac cett. Ficinus, quivertit assecuti sunt272a7 ὥστε μηδ’ ἂν ἕνα αὐτοῖς οἷόν τ’ εἶναι μηδ’ ἀντᾶραι· οὕτωμηδ΄ἂν cett.: μὴδὲν W L R (haec varia absunt in Burnet; accentum in W falso habet Méridier)ἕνα cett. Rosspc(punctis notavit) : ἕνεκα Rossacαὐτοῖς] αὐτοῦ N337μηδ΄ἂν / μὴδὲν ἂν ἕνα αὐτοῖς οἷόν τ’ εἶναι om. S(causa homoeoarcti μὴδὲν ἂν)ἀντᾶραι cett. R: ἀντάραι W L ἀντᾶιραι T (haec varia absunt in Burnet et Méridier)272a8 δεινὼ γεγόνατον ἐν τοῖς λόγοις μάχεσθαί τε καὶ ἐξελέγχειν
ἐξελέγχειν] ἐξελέχειν N337
272b1 τὸ ἀεὶ λεγόμενον, ὁμοίως ἐάντε ψεῦδος ἐάντε ἀληθὲς ᾖ. ἐγὼαἰεὶ Bac(ci) T V2196 U31 Γ Pa08 cett. Sc L85.6 N337: ἀεὶ Bpc(unam litteram post alpha erasit et altero
atramento alpha refecit) V U32 M Pa11 s (haec varia absunt in Burnet et Méridier)ὁμοίως cett. Pa09 Sc L85.6 N337 Ald Ba01 Ba02 St: non habent Barb Pa11 sἦι B T W L ᾖ. Pa08 ἦ cett. R
272b2 μὲν οὖν, ὦ Κρίτων, ἐν νῷ ἔχω τοῖν ἀνδροῖν παραδοῦναιὦ cett. a Ross CS180 c: ὁ Palνῶι B T Barb(iota adscripto) W L νῷ Sc νῶ cett. R
272b3 ἐμαυτόν· καὶ γάρ φατον ἐν ὀλίγῳ χρόνῳ ποιῆσαι ἂν καὶφατον R φατὸν cett. W L φατόν Ross S－ 81 －

ὀλίγωι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) ὀλίγῳ Pa09 a ὀλίγω cett.
χρόνωι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W L χρόνῳ Pa09 a χρόνω cett. Rἂν om. R
272b4 ἄλλον ὁντινοῦν τὰ αὐτὰ ταῦτα δεινόν.
ὅντιν΄οὖν B V U32 T Pa08 Sc W L ὁντινοῦν cett. R ὅντινα οὖν Γ (haec varia absunt in Burnet etMéridier)τὰ αὐτὰ ταῦτα] ταῦτα τὰ αὐτὰ Γ
272b5 ΚΡ. Τί δέ, ὦ Σώκρατες; οὐ φοβῇ τὴν ἡλικίαν, μὴ ἤδητί δὲ B V U32 Ang M Pa09ac S W L R: τί δαὶ T V2196 U31 Γ Pa08 Barb Pa09pc(s.l. αι eodem atramento
scrips.) a Ross CS180 Pal c V186 Ξ Sc L85.6 N337(ut videtur) Pa11 sοὐ cett. U32pc(punctis notavit et eodem atramento s.l. οὐ scrips.): μὴ U32ac
φοβεῖ B T φοβῆι Barb(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W φοβῇ Pa09 a φοβῆ cett. L R φοβοῖ V U32(haec varia absunt in Burnet et Méridier)μὴ ἤδη cett. Sc L85.6 N337 Pa11: μὴ δὲ ἤδη s272b6 πρεσβύτερος ᾖς;ἦις B T ἦς cett.
post τί δὲ / δαὶ ... οὐ φοβῇ / φοβεῖ ... ᾖς / ἦις / ἦς sign.i. interpunx. commate infra dicolon
B T Γ Pa09 c N337 Pa11 W commate sinistra infra dicolon Pa08 commate infra colon Ang M scommmate dextra colon adscripto CS180 Pal commate infra colon ante altius colon pro signointerlocutorum mutaionis V186 Ξ commate dextra infra dicolon Barb S L R commate sinistra duo
puncta horizontalia Sc commate infra colon ante dicolon pro signo interlocutorum mutationis
habendum a Ross: non habent V U32 V2196 U31 L85.6
272b7 ΣΩ. Ἥκιστά γε, ὦ Κρίτων· ἱκανὸν τεκμήριον ἔχω καὶἔχω B V U32 Γ Mpc(ν erasit) W L R: ἔχων T V2196 U31 Pa08 Mac cett.
272b8 παραμύθιον τοῦ μὴ φοβεῖσθαι. αὐτὼ γὰρ τούτω, ὡς ἔποςμὴ non habet s
272b9 εἰπεῖν, γέροντε ὄντε ἠρξάσθην ταύτης τῆς σοφίας ἧς ἔγωγεἠρξάσθην cett.: ἠρξάστην U31
ταύτης om. Mac et eodem atramento s.l. supplev. Mpc－ 82 －

272b10 ἐπιθυμῶ, τῆς ἐριστικῆς· πέρυσιν ἢ προπέρυσιν οὐδέπω ἤστηνπέρυσιν B V U32 T W: πέρυσι cett. L R περίσυ N337
δὲ post πέρυσιν / πέρυσι / περίσυ non habet B V U32: habent cett.
προπέρυσιν cett. W L: προπέρυσι R
272c1 σοφώ. ἀλλ’ ἐγὼ ἓν μόνον φοβοῦμαι, μὴ αὖ ὄνειδος τοῖναὖ B V U32 αὐτὸς cett.
τοῖν cett. a Ross CS180 c: τὴν Pal
272c2 ξένοιν περιάψω, ὥσπερ Κόννῳ τῷ Μητροβίου, τῷ κιθαριστῇ,περιάψω] περιάγω Rossκόννωι B T Pa08 W κόννῳ Ang a c κόννω cett. L κόνω R
τῶι pr. B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W L τῷ a τῶ cett. Rτῶι post. B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W L τῷ a τῶ cett. Rκιθαρισθῆι B T Pa08c(iota adscripto) W L κιθαριστῇ Barb a κιθαρισθῆ cett. R
scholion ad κόννος: ὁ τοῦ σωκράτους διδάσκαλος Κόννος ὁ κιθαριστὴς CS 180(altero
atramento altera manu)
272c3 ὃς ἐμὲ διδάσκει ἔτι καὶ νῦν κιθαρίζειν· ὁρῶντες οὖν οἱ παῖδεςκιθαρίζειν] κιθαρίξειν U32
272c4 οἱ συμφοιτηταί μοι ἐμοῦ τε καταγελῶσι καὶ τὸν Κόννον
μοι W L R: μου B T cett. μοῦ Vκόννον B T Angac Spc(eadem manu s.l. ν add.) cett. W L κόνον V U32 Angpc(ν erasit) Pal Sac R
272c5 καλοῦσι γεροντοδιδάσκαλον. μὴ οὖν καὶ τοῖν ξένοιν τιςκαλοῦσι B V U32 T V2196 U31 Γ Pa08pc(aliquas litteras erasit et altero atramento ουσι inposuit)Angpc(aliquas litteras erasit et altero atramento ουσι inposuit) M Barb Pa09 a Ross CS180 Pal c S
V186 Ξ Sc L85.6pc(λοῦσι altero atramento fecit) W L R: καλεῖσθαι L85.6ac(ci) N337 Pa11 sτούτοιν post ξένοιν habent W L R
272c6 ταὐτὸν τοῦτο ὀνειδίσῃ· οἱ δ’ αὐτὸ τοῦτο ἴσως φοβούμενοιταὐτὸν τοῦτο] ταὐτὸ τοῦτο T Pa08 Sc ταυτὸ τοῦτο Β V U32 Γ Ang M Barb Pa09 a Ross CS180 Pal c
V186 Ξ L85.6 N337 Pa11 s W L R ταυτὸ τοῦτ΄ V2196 U31 αὖτὸ τοῦτο S
ὀνειδίσηι B Τ Pa08 W ὀνειδίσῃ Ang ὀνειδίση cett.
－ 83 －

272c7 τάχα με οὐκ ἂν ἐθέλοιεν προσδέξασθαι. ἐγὼ δ’, ὦ Κρίτων,με B V U32 T V2196 U31 Pa08(epsilon sic caeso in duas partes ut aliquid compendium (vide μὲνin 271c2)) Ang V186pc(altero atramento ε inposito) Ξpc(ε inposito) Sc L85.6 N337 Pa11 s W L R

Ficinus, qui vertit me recusent Ald Ba01 Ba02 St: μὲν M(εν compendio) Barb Pa09 a(εν compendio)
Ross(εν compendio) CS180 Pal c(εν compendio) S(εν compendio) V186ac Ξacπροσδέξασθαι B T V2196 Γ W cett. ποσδέξασθαι U31(ρ et ο sicut omicron ligatis in V2196)
272c8 ἐκεῖσε μὲν ἄλλους πέπεικα συμμαθητάς μοι φοιτᾶν πρεμοι B T cett. Ficinus, qui vertit mecum: μου W L R (haec varia absunt in Burnet)φοιτᾶν B T cett. W Lpc(altero atramento ᾶ fecit) R: φοιταῖν Pa08 Lac(spatio literarum duarum)φοιτᾷν Ang a c
272d1 σβύτας, ἐνταῦθα δέ γε ἑτέρους πειράσομαι πείθειν. καὶ σὺ τίκαὶ σύ τι που T W cett. καί συ τί που Β V U32 καὶ σύ τοι που R και συ τι που Sc(accentus
nequeunt legi) (accentum de σύ pro spiritu falso habuit Burnet; lectio in B abest in Méridier)
272d2 οὐ συμφοιτᾷς; ὡς δὲ δέλεαρ αὐτοῖς ἄξομεν τοὺς σοὺς ὑεῖς·οὐ συμφοιτᾷς; ὡς Ficinus, qui vertit, sed cur non et tu venis? Winkelmann: που συμφοίτα ἴσως
Β T W cett.
ἄξομεν T Angac Wpc(ἀ s.l. eodem atramento add.) cett. Ficinus, qui vertit ducens: ἕξομεν B V
U32 Angpc(altero atramento ε fecit) Wac L Rαὐτοῖς ἄξομεν / ἕξομεν B V U32 T V2196 U31 Γ Pa08pc(eodem atramento lineam simplicem supraαὐτοῖς atque lineam duplicem supra ἄξομεν scripsit) M Barb Pa09 Wac et pc L R ἄξομεν αὐτοῖς
Pa08ac Angac/pc cett. Ald Ba01 Ba02 Stυἱεῖς B T Γ W cett.: οἱ εἰς V2196 οἰ εἰς U31 ὑλεῖς s272d3 ἐφιέμενοι γὰρ ἐκείνων οἶδ’ ὅτι καὶ ἡμᾶς παιδεύσουσιν.
272d4 ΚΡ. Ἀλλ’ οὐδὲν κωλύει, ὦ Σώκρατες, ἐάν γε σοὶ δοκῇ.
ἐάν γε σοὶ] ἐάν γε σοι V2196 U31 ἐὰν γέ σοι B V U32 T Pa08 Ang Barb Pa09 a Ross CS180 Pal c V186 Ξ
Sc L85.6 Pa11 s W L ἐάν γέ σοι Γ S N337 Rδοκῆι T Pa08 W L R δοκῆ V2196 U31 Γ cett. Sc L85.6: δοκεῖ B V U32 Ross N337 Pa11 s
272d5 πρῶτον δέ μοι διήγησαι τὴν σοφίαν τοῖν ἀνδροῖν τίς ἐστιν,ἐστιν B T cett.: ἐστι W compendio N337
－ 84 －

272d6 ἵνα εἰδῶ ὅτι καὶ μαθησόμεθα.
ἵνα εἰδῶ] ἵν΄ εἰδῶ Γεἰδῶ] ἰδῶ Rossὅτι B T cett.: ὅ τι Barb c S W (hoc abest in Méridier)
272d7 ΣΩ. Οὐκ ἂν φθάνοις ἀκούων· ὡς οὐκ ἂν ἔχοιμί γε εἰπεῖν
272d8 ὅτι οὐ προσεῖχον τὸν νοῦν αὐτοῖν, ἀλλὰ πάνυ καὶ προσεῖχοναὐτοῖν cett. W L Rpc(eodem atramento ν s.l. scrips.): αὐτοῖς Rac
272d9 καὶ μέμνημαι, καί σοι πειράσομαι ἐξ ἀρχῆς ἅπαντα διηγή272e1 σασθαι. κατὰ θεὸν γάρ τινα ἔτυχον καθήμενος ἐνταῦθα,272e2 οὗπερ σύ με εἶδες, ἐν τῷ ἀποδυτηρίῳ μόνος, καὶ ἤδη ἐν νῷεἶδες T Γ W cett.: εἴδες V2196 U31 ἴδες B V U32 οἷδες Rossτῶι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) L τῷ Pa09 a τῶ cett. W Rἀποδυτηρίωι B T Pa08 c(iota adscripto) W L ἀποδυτηρίῳ Pa09 a R ἀποδυτηρίω cett.
ἐνῶ scrips. V186ac et ἐν νῶ fecit V186pc(altero atramento ν s.l. add.)νῶι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) νῷ a νῶ cett.
272e3 εἶχον ἀναστῆναι· ἀνισταμένου δέ μου ἐγένετο τὸ εἰωθὸςἀναστῆναι] ἀποστῆναι U32
δέ μου T W cett.: δ΄ ἐμοῦ B V U32
τὸ om. Pal V186ac et altero atramento s.l. supplev. V186pc
272e4 σημεῖον τὸ δαιμόνιον. πάλιν οὖν ἐκαθεζόμην, καὶ ὀλίγῳὀλίγωι B T Pa08 a(iota adscripto) ὀλίγω cett.
273a1 ὕστερον εἰσέρχεσθον τούτω—ὅ τ’ Εὐθύδημος καὶ ὁ Διονυτ΄ εὐθύδημος] τε εὐθύδημος Rossκαὶ ὁ διονυσόδωρος / διονυσιόδωρος cett. Ang pc(altero atramento ὁ δι s.l. scrips.): καὶονυσόδωρος Angacδιονυσόδωρος cett. R: διονυσιόδωρος W L－ 85 －

273a2 σόδωρος—καὶ ἄλλοι μαθηταὶ ἅμα αὖ πολλοὶ ἐμοὶ δοκεῖν·αὖ post ἅμα habent B V U32: non habent T W cett.
δοκεὶν Bpc(eodem atramento i.t. nu add.) V U32 δοκεῖ Bac T W cett.
273a3 εἰσελθόντε δὲ περιεπατείτην ἐν τῷ καταστέγῳ δρόμῳ. καὶεἰσελθόντε T Γ W cett.: εἰσελθόντες B V U32 V2196 U31 Pal
καὶ post περιεπατείτην habent V2196 U31
τῶι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) a(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) W τῶ cett. L R
καταστέγωι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) c(iota adscripto) καταστέγῳ Pa09 a καταστέγω cett.
δρόμωι B T Pa08 Barb(iota adscripto) W L δρόμῳ Pa09 a CS180 c δρόμω cett. R nequit legi Sc
273a4 οὔπω τούτω δύ’ ἢ τρεῖς δρόμους περιεληλυθότε ἤστην,δύ΄] δύο V2196 U31περιεληλυθότε] περιεληλυθότες V2196 U31
273a5 καὶ εἰσέρχεται Κλεινίας, ὃν σὺ φῂς πολὺ ἐπιδεδωκέναι,οὐκ post καὶ scrips. Pa08ac et aliqua manu delevit Pa08pc
φηὶς B W φηῖς T Pa08 φὴς Γ L R cett. φής Ross φῆς V2196 U31 Ang Pa09 a nequit legi Sc
273a6 ἀληθῆ λέγων· ὄπισθεν δὲ αὐτοῦ ἐρασταὶ πάνυ πολλοί τεπολοί scrips. Palac et eodem atramento λ s.l. add. Palpc
273a7 καὶ ἄλλοι καὶ Κτήσιππος, νεανίσκος τις Παιανιεύς, μάλακαὶ pr. habent V2196 U31 Γ Pa08 Ang Mac(ut videtur) Sc(ut videtur) cett. Ficinus, qui vertit amici etalii multi: non habent B V T Mpc(litteras tres erasit et eodem atramento ε in ras. add.) Ξpc(eodem
atramento καὶ punctis notavit) W L R (hoc abest in Méridier)κτήσιππος νεανίσκος τις] κτήσιππός τις νεανίσκος V2196 U31
273a8 καλός τε κἀγαθὸς τὴν φύσιν, ὅσον μὴ ὑβριστὴς δὲ διὰ τὸτὴν φύσιν] τῆ φύσει Rossμὴ post ὅσον habent B V Tpc(eodem atramento s.l.) Γ Pa08ac Angac Sc L85.6ac N337 Pa11 s W L R:μὲν habent V2196 U31 Pa08pc(eodem atramento εν in η inposuit et accentum refecit) Angpc(εν inη inposuit) M Barb Pa09 a Ross CS180 Pal c S V186 Ξ L85.6pc(altero atramento εν fecit) Ficinus, quivertit sed ipsa iuuentute lasciuior Ald Ba01 Ba02 St: nullum habet Tac－ 86 －

273b1 νέος εἶναι. ἰδὼν οὖν με ὁ Κλεινίας ἀπὸ τῆς εἰσόδου μόνον
νέος cett. Sc(ut videtur) N337 Pa11 s: νέοι L85.6
οὖν] δέ Ross
273b2 καθήμενον, ἄντικρυς ἰὼν παρεκαθέζετο ἐκ δεξιᾶς, ὥσπερ καὶκαὶ om. V
273b3 σὺ φῄς. ἰδόντε δὲ αὐτὸν ὅ τε Διονυσόδωρος καὶ ὁ Εὐθύφῆις B T Pa08 φηὶς W φῆς cett. L R φής c S L85.6 N337 sἰδόντε T W cett.: ἰδόντες B V (lectio in W abest in Burnet; Méridier falso legit W)
τε B T W cett.: γε a Ross CS180 Pal c S nequit legi Scδιονυσόδωρος] διονυσιόδωρος W L R
ὁ non habent V2196 U31
273b4 δημος πρῶτον μὲν ἐπιστάντε διελεγέσθην ἀλλήλοιν, ἄλλην
273b5 καὶ ἄλλην ἀποβλέποντε εἰς ἡμᾶς—καὶ γὰρ πάνυ αὐτοῖνἀποβλέποντε T Γ cett.: ἀποβλέποντες B V V2196(ες compendio) U31 Ross W L R nequit legi Scαὐτοῖν προσεῖχον Β V W L R: προσεῖχον αὐτοῖν Τ cett.
273b6 προσεῖχον τὸν νοῦν—ἔπειτα ἰόντε ὁ μὲν παρὰ τὸ μειράκιον
273b7 ἐκαθέζετο, ὁ Εὐθύδημος, ὁ δὲ παρ’ αὐτὸν ἐμὲ ἐξ ἀριστερᾶς,ὁ pr. habent T W cett.: non habent B V nequit legi Sc
ἐμὲ B V W L R: με T cett. nequit legi Scἐξ ἀριστερᾶς T Sc(ut videtur) cett. Ficinus, qui vertit ad sinistram: ἐν ἀριστερᾶι B Wpc(alphainitial refecit) ἐν ἀριστερᾶ V ἐπ΄ ἀριστρᾶ L R (haec varia absunt in Burnet; correctio in W
abest in Méridier)273b8 οἱ δ’ ἄλλοι ὡς ἕκαστος ἐτύγχανεν.

－ 87 －

プラトン『エウテュデーモス』本文伝承に関する仮説
瀧

章

次

【要旨】
プラトン著作『エウテュデーモス』本文再構成上予備的作業として、直接伝承現存全写本並びに間接伝承一部数写本につき本文一部のサンプル校合を行ない、本文伝承上の異同を記述し、分析する。その結果、伝承主要系統は、Bodleianus, E.D. Clarke 39 (B) と、想定される祖本から派生する Venetus app. class. IV, 1 (T) と Vindobonensis suppl. gr. 7 (W) の 3 つからなり、残る
写本本文はこれら三者から派生すると仮説を立てることが有力である。また、近世、フィチー
ノ訳並びに 16 世紀の初期印刷版本はいずれも Venetus gr. 186 の本文に基づき作成されたものと推定され、この写本は数多くの他に由来する修正が施されているものである。

－ 88 －