48

TH E EA RTH REVIEW .

S i b , — In the recent occultation of
Jupiter, why was it occulted in the cres­
cent or light part of the moon ONLY ? forit was seen wending its way within thethe horns of the crescent, thus :—so that it must h a 'e been seen throu-h
the mountains, craters, etc . etc., that is
the solid part of the moon, the shadow of-T H E -the Earth notwithstanding— if the M oon
is a solid globe of mountains, e;c., howwill the F .R .A .S . account for this phenomenon ?

I don t know— but I want to—^ARTH'Notaglobe-J^EVIEW

though it doesn't much matter.
JNO. S.

ANSW ERSTOCORRESPONDENTS.

A ll letters to the Editor should be briefly and le g ib i-y written on one side of thepaper only.
They must be accompanied by the name and address of the writer, as aguarantee of good faith.
Where replies are requested by post, the postage must be
enclosed.
The Editor does not hold himself responsible forjthe opinions expressedby correspondents. A ll letters must be prepaid and addressed to
LEO

A Sectional V iew of the W orld as a Plane.

V o l.

III. No. 6( M o n th ly

S e r ie s ).

P r ic e .

Id .

CASTLE,SEPTEM BER t o DECEM BER, 1896.

c/o M r J. W IL L IA M S ,32, Eankside, I.ONDON, S.E“ U N IV ER SA L
E D IT O R I A L

N O TICES.

Our Map Fund is still open awaiting any further subscriptions, friends may bepleased to forward us.
W ill friends who have received notification that their subscriptions are due, kindly
forward the same to the Secretary at once, as he is greatly in want of funds to continue
th j Monthly issu:.
May we request friends to remember, that in future, a large blue pencil mark— across - on the outside of the cover in which the “ Review ” is sent, signifies that yoursubscription is due.
The circumstances of our Secretary having been materially altered o f late, histime being taken up all day, sometimes until 9 o’clock p.m , friends therefore must
please excuse any delay that may occur in getting out the “ Review,” or replying to
any correspondence they may forward him.
W'e are at the request of a few friends, bringing out an Index to the first eightNos of the “ Review.” W ill those who would like to have one, kindly communicate
the fact :o us, as we do not want to print more than will be required.

A

PURE

A S S U M P T IO N .”Please to ask for “ The Earth— not a G lobe— Review,” at all Newsagents,
Reading Rooms, and Railway Bookstalls.
T o be had direct from the Hon. Sec ,post free, to any address in the postal union for is 6d per year, in advance.
A ll monies for the Society must be paid direct to the local V ice Secretaries, ordirect to the Hon. Secretary and Treasurer, John Williams. Post Office Orders to bemade payable at Sumner Street, S. E.

G R A V IT A T IO N ,B y L eo C a st l e .

No. VII.
The following extracts are taken from Blair’s Grammar of Philosophy,(p. 382-

391, &c.):—“ The power of mutual attraction SUPPOSES that each of the twobodies pushes the other on their opposite sides, where the actor is notpresent, consequently not in force ; for a body does not move except in
the direction in which it is impelled. Nor, by a false analogy, do bodies
draw one another, for there is no drawing-tackle between them.”“ The power of mutual repulsion implies that each body is in force
in a direction contrary to that in which each is moving, for each moves
its own way, yet by repulsion is required to act the other way, thougheach is moving from the other, this is a contradiction.”“ The power of gravitation in its alleged phenomena, that o{fallingbodies, is deemed a variety of attraction, which is essentially absurd, as
the Earth does not push falling bodies on their remote side towards its
own centre 1 ”

5°

T H E EA R TH R E V IE W .
A STRO N O M Y M ADE EASY.

“ The power of universal gravitation first assumes a power of attrac­
tion between the heavenly bodies, which, as attraction, is absurd; andto this absurdity it adds [by supposition.— E d .] a force not displayed in
the bodies as matter of fact, since they do not fall together.”“ T H E PR E TE N CE S T O P R O VE TH E SE FANCIES, BY
APPEALS TO A R IT H M E TIC AND GEOM ETRY, A R E GROSSIM POSTURES AN D A R T F U L M YSTIFICATIO N S.”“ T H E PROOFS PRETEN D ED TO BE D ER IVED FROMGEO M E TR Y A R E ESSEN TIA LLY IR R ELE VAN T.
GEOME­T R Y IS T H E SCIEN CE OF Q U A N T IT Y IN T H E ABSTRACT,AN D IN VEN TS N O TH IN G W H A TE VE R A BO U T POWERS
AN D Q U ALITIES.
JUST SO IN M A TH E M A TIC A L A N A LY­
SIS ; T H E D A T A M UST BE A SS U M E D , AND T H E RESULT
DEPEN D ON T H E REASONABLENESS OF TH E DATA,W H ICH A R E Q U IT E IN D EPEN D EN T OF TH E M ATH EM A­
T IC A L DED U CTIO N S.”“ Newton, mistaking the cause of terrestrial weights, invented
universal weight, disguising it by translation into gravitation ; and thenhe was obliged to invent a second force, equally gratuitous and still moremysterious, to accommodate his first mistake to the phenomena of cir­cular motion.”“ Nature and geometry accord only in ttuan points. Every point isa mean in Nature, though it is not so in diagrams. Mistakes in thisrespect pervade Newton’s Principia, and all the Scholastic Philosophy.”“ Nothing can be more irrational than the hypothesis of a FIXED
sun governing a moving system ; nothing more trifling than the connec­
tion of the motions with the conic sections; nothing more absurd thana law for one of the bodies which does not obtain equally in the other,and, therefore, no appreciable law as to either; and nothing can be
more incongruous than the hypothesis that the local generation of cen­tral force, as a necessary principle of aggregation in one planet, governs
other distant bodies as a universal force ! ”“ The gratuitous theory of universal gravitation, which affords nodata for any calculation, and demands concessions of faith about densitie.<!, &c., is utterly at variance with analogy.”(To be Continued.)
R ID IC U L O U S T H E O R IE S .
“ T h e theory that the sun is a great burning mass is as ridiculous as a ll scientifictheories are.” — Professor Uernstein.

“ ASTRONOMYSI

M A D E EASY .”Such is the heading of a series of papers which appeared in Lloyd's
Weekly Newspaper from Aug. 9th to Oct. 4th, the writers being Sir
R obert Ball, F.R.A.S.; Professor W. T. Lynn, B.A., F.R.A.S.; andProfessor A. Fowler, F.R.A.S.
" Once, to every man and nation,
Comes the moment to decide :In the strife of Truth and Falsehood,
For the good or evil side.”— j^otes and Queries, June, 1896, p. 1*5.
It was our intention to tvrite a series o f letters in reply to those appearing in“ LloycFs Newspaper, but, as the Editor o f ' ‘ Lloyd's” d id not insert the following
Utter, which was written in reply to the first one that appeared, or even manly enoughto achnowledge its receplioiz, we detennined not to send any tnore fo r the W. P .
k it
to place our refutation o f the teaching o f these gentlemen on record in our awn Journal.
A n d as copies are sent to the British Museum, the readers there w ill be emble to see thethread-bare state o f the so-called “ most excut o f the sciences,” and the cowardice e f
the Editors o f the so called “ P u ilic Press,” “ 7 'he Free Press,”

TH E

TOTAL

E C L I P S E O F T H E SUN.
q t h , 1896.
To the Editor o f Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper.
A u g u st

D e a r S ir , — The letter by Professor A. Fowler, F.R.A.S,, appearing
in your issue of August 9th, certainly does not make Astronomy easy,
but exceedingly hard of belief! With your kind permission, and forthe benefit of your numerous readers, I will prove this out, and in thenterest of Good and Right and Truth, I trust you will insert this letterin your next issue.

First. Professor Fowler says, “ the moon is a dark body.” This,
Sir, is not true! That is, if practical observation and undeniable facts
are to be believed in preference to so-called ‘ science teaching,” Letus, then, with unbiased minds, test this statement by facts, (i.) If“ the moon is a dark body,” how was it that in the occultation of Jupiterby the moon (June 14th), Jupiter was seen through this “ dark body,”
positively seen through the “ mountains, craters, rivers, seas,” etc., etc.?
(2.) If “ the moon is a dark body,” therefore utterly devoid of any in­herent light, how is it that, at a total eclipse of the moon, she is seen
through the “ earth’s shadow ” shining as brightly as ever ? Surely a“ dark body " cannot do that when its light-source is cut off. Impos­
sible ! (3.) If “ the moon is a dark body,” and only a reflector of sun
light, where is the sense in calling it moonlight ? (4.) If “ the moon isa dark body,” and a mere reflector of sunlight, why is it that the farther

52

she is away from the sun the brighter she shines ? It is a demonstrable
fact patent to anyone, that the farther away a reflector is from its lightthe duller is its reflection, while the nearer it is the brighter it shines.
But the moon’s light is less bright the nearer she is to the sun! Again,
science, so-called, affirms that a reflector reflecting light reflects the heatof the light. Why, then, does the moon not reflect heat, seeing thatmodern astronomy asserts “ the sun is the source of all heat and light
This has been tested, and the test has irrefutably proved that the asser­
tions made by teachers of modern theoretical astronomy are notfounded in practical facts, but are the flimsy conjectures of their own
making. The following extracts will suffice any honest enquirer :—“ The light of the moon, though concentrated by the most powerful burning,
glass, is incapable of raising the temperature of the most delicate thermometer.” —Dr. Noad, Lectures on Chemistry, p. 334.
“ The moon’s rays, when concentrated, actually reduce the temperature upon athermometer more than eight degrees.” — The Lancet, March 14th, 1856.

(5.) How can a body the diameter of which is only 2,200 miles eclipse
a body the diameter of which is 887,076 miles ? Professor Fowler says
“ for the best results (from observations of solar eclipses) the instru­
ments must be equatorially mounted, and provided with clockwork, sothat they may exactly follow the sun in its movement across the sky.”
Why, Mr. Editor, what, in the name of commonsense and logic,
does the Professor mean ? Is it possible that he— that you— that thereaders of your paper— do not see that Professor Fowler contradicts Sir
Isaac Newton, and utterly overthrows the fundamental proposition ofModern Astronomy, which, in the third book of the Principia, is thus
expressed— “ The Sun is the centre of the Solar System and IMMOV­ABLE.” Surely an immovable sun that requires to be “ followed in its
movements across the sky ” is a curiosity which can only be seen by the“ learned scientists” of the "enlightened 19th century.” The earth isat last tacitly acknowledged by Professor Fowler, F.R.A.S., to bestationary, and the sun a moving body in the heavens! This is thejustification and verification of the Zetetic contention and teaching!
To assert that a thing is immovable, and at the same time to assert thatit moves, is not only illogical, but the utter stultification of language!
Surely Professor Fowler, if the world is a globe revolving before an
immovable sun, so forming day and night as we were taught at school,
the only clockwork essential for observing an eclipse of the sun or moonis the axial motion of the globe. To sum up, Mr. Editor, Professor
Fowler has proved, up to the hilt, that the earth is not a revolving“ oblate spheroid,” a globe, but a vast irregular plane, with the sun,moon, and stars moving in their appointed pathways, at very moderate

53

ASTRONOM Y MADE EASY.

T H E liA RTH REVIEW .

from the earth. It is also proved that the moon does not
sun, for the moon is evidently a transparent body. And
when stars of the 7th magnitude have been seen through it, surely it is
only a reasonable and logical conclusion, confirmed by many observa­
tions, that the moon is no more the cause of the eclipse of the sun thanthe earth is the cause of an eclipse of the moon.

distances

eclipse theThe belief in these “ old wives’ fables” is caused by school cram­ming in our unsuspecting childhood, ere we were capable of indepen­
dent and right reasoning. And as the majority grow up their minds are
set like steel according to the unshapely mould in which the teachers
cast them. The ductility, vivacity, and ambition of youth is utterly
crushed out of our children, and we find them mentally dwarfed, biased,
weak, passive, dependent, servile, misinformed, therefore readily disposed
to believe whatever interested and scheming men, reputed “ great ” or“ learned,” are pleased to tell them, and consequently resists every pre­sentation of truth.
A s for Professors, Editors, Teachers and Ministers,
the question with them is not always “ What is truth ?” but more often,
Which is popular 1 i.e.. Which will pay?
Yours respectfully.
L eo C a st l e .

ORANGEP O L A R IT Y .

'• The orange was originally a berry, and its evolution has been going on for morethan 1000 years. — Science Siftings, January 9th, 1892.
Professor— “ Explain the cause o f the polar flatness of the orange.”
Student— “ W e suppose that the early rudimentary orange, being ‘ a berry,’ wasfreely suspended by its stalk, rotated on its axis, and thereby acquired a bulging at its
equator and flattening at its poles.
T h e modification— according to the ‘ laws ot
evolution’— was found to be an improvement, consequently it was permanently
retained by ‘ natural selection,’ and now prop^ates its species according to the ‘ law ’of the ‘ survival of the fittest ’ astronomer who wrote such nonsense.” — Balaam's Ass.

“ T R U T H I R R I T A T E S T H O S E W H O M I T E N L IG H T E N S B U T D O E S
N O T C O N V E R T .”“ Objects seen from a balloon always seem at least five times smaller than do thesame sized objects when looked at horizontally from the earth at the same distance—
say from one mile high and one mile along the earth’s surface.” — Airopaidia; byThos, Baldwin, Esq., M .A .

X

54

r

T H E LA RG EST G LO BE ON EARTH .

T H E EA RTH REVIEW .

THE

L A R G E S T G L O B E ON E A R T H .

55

Is this not an unequivocal proof that the earth is a vast irregu­
lar plane ?

It is proposed to erect in London a terrestrial globe having a diameUr o f eighty,/ourftet, and showing the earth’s surface on a scale of about eight miles to the inch.
A t Paris, in 1889, a globe was exhibited, but this one will be double the diameter,
and upon it every geographical feature of importance will be shown and named, as
will also be every city or town having 5000 inhabitants, besides a large selection ofothers with a smaller population. The larger cities will be drawn to scale. London
w ill cover a space rather larger than that o f a penny.
The idea of the big globe just described is that of Mr T . Ruddiman Johnston,
F .R .G .S ., who has developed a process by which the globe can be constructed in
two years. In the making of the globe he hopes to have the, views o f a ll those having
a special knowledge o f any portion o f the eartKs mirface, and will confine his labours
to systematising the information supplied, organising a staflF, and guiding it towards
the satisfactory completion of the globe. The President of the R .G .S . approves ofthis scheme, “ D aily News,” July 9th, 1896.

D e a r S i r — Having read in the Daily News of July 9th. that you
have an idea of erecting in London, a “ terrestial globe,” I write, seeing
you “ hope to have the views of all those having a special knowledge ofany portion of the earth’s surface,” to inform you that a “ globe,” nomatter to what scale it may be constructed, is not in any sense a repre­
sentation of any portion of the earth’s surface according to nature. Thiscan be proved by practical investigation.

It is an undeniable and manifested fact in nature, that neither theSun, Moon or Stars even disappear (set) BELOW a tangent line, nomatter what height the phenomena be viewed from.
That one absolute fact alone Sir, is the utter annihilation of theteaching of Modern Astronomers and Geographers that we are living ona ten-motioned, Dutch-cheese-shaped sea-earth-globe.
Again, Sir, the science of hydrostatics absolutely refutes the teachinglliat the earth’s surface is curved. To go no further, in the “ English
Mechanic,” June 26th, 1896., we read ;—L E V E L OF T H E SEA.
Since any given body of Water . . . .
M UST H AVE A LEVELSU RFACE id est NO ONE PA R T H IG H ER T H A N ANOTHER*
and seeing that all our oceans (a few inland seas excepted) are connected
together, it follows that they A R E A L L V IR T U A L L Y OF THE
SAME LEVEL."‘ This writer in the E .M . asserts that nu one part of water can be higher thananother. Is this absolutely true J

If you can forward me any proof that the earth is a twirling globe I
shall be very pleased to consider, and courteously reply to it.
I remain, dear Sir,Yours respectfully,
J n o . W il l ia m s , Hon. Secy.

Universal Zetetic Society,32 Bankside, S.E.
T. R u d d im an Johnson, Esq., F.R.G.S., 24 Pall-Mall, S.W.
P.S.— One other question occurs to me to ask. Will your “ bigglobe” when on view have axial, orbital, or in fact any of the ten motions
it is said to possess ?
Of course those who desire to truthfully represent nature in any of
its parts, should not leave out any part or fact absolutely connected withit, or consequently a misrepresentation will be presented, and you, sir,would not be guilty of that I feel quite sure.
In the First Principles of Natural Philosophy, by W. T. Lynn, Esqr.,
B.A., F.R.A.S., we read the following“ The upper surface of a fluid at rest . . . is a horizontal plane,
since otherwise, if a part of the surface were higher than the rest, thoseparts of the fluid which were under it would exert a greater pressure
upon the surrounding parts than they received from them, so that
motion would take place amongst the particles and continue until there
were none at a higher level than the rest, that is, until the upper surfaceof the whole mass of fluid became a horizontal plane.”Is thisabsolutely true ?
Dr. Lardner in his “ Natural Philospohy” says :— “ A liquid surface
when at rest will always assume the form of a horizontal or level plane.’»Is this absolutely true 1
Now, gentlemen of the R.G.S., will you please tell us if Professor
Alfred R. Wallace, F.R.G.S., Doctor M. W. B. Coulcher, and the late
Editor of “The Field,” Mr J. H. Walsh, said what was absolutely true,
when they declared that the water midway between Old Bedford Bridge
and Welney Bridge was five feet H IG H ER than at the Bridges ?
I take the pleasure of forwarding you a copy of our Journal for
July, i§95,— J n o . W,

56

TH E EA RTH REV IEW .

FLA T-EA RTH PH ILOSOPH Y.

To the Editor of tht Daily News.

fin three ways— by experimenting along straight stretches ofwater, where a point midway between the beginning and the end wasfound not to be in the same horizontal plane with points at the be­ginning and the end: by the fact that at sea the upper sails of an
approaching vessel are seen first, and not the hull and by the shadowof the earth on the moon, when the latter is eclipsed, the shadow being
round.]

D e a r S i r , — I see by your issue of July the 9th that T. Ruddiman

Johnston, Esqr., F.R.G.S., hopes to have the views of all those having a
special knowledge of a.ny portion of the earths surface, therefore I havs
forwarded him mine, and herewith send you a copy of my letter to him
for insertion in your columns, for the subject is one of general public
interest. With thanks in anticipation of insertion.— I remain,
Yours obliged,
J n o . W il l ia m s .

The Editor of the “Daily News” did not insert our Secretary’s letter.
We suppose he was afraid lest the eyes of the public should be opened,
and the fraud imposed upon them in their unsuspecting childhood
should be made manifest! A so-called science that has to hide itself insilence is certainly not worth much, if anything at all.
“ The reptile Press of Europe,
That sell their tainted wares,
Have earned their dirty wages—
And much our England cares !
Shall we renounce our birthright
T o lay the tyrant low,
Because the men whom money buys
Gnash teeth, and mutter “ No ? ”

The following is a copy of a note sent by a friend.
H o n . S i r , — Seeing the notice of your proposed model (Theoretical)
Globe, and that many opinions by public men have been tendered on
the usefulness or otherwise of the object, I thought it good to remindyou, there is a large body of thinkers represented by the “ Universal
Zetetic Society,” who will gladly welcome the appearing of the Model,on account of the rare opportunity it will afford them of publicly ex­
posing and bringing into disrepute the “ Premiss of a ll TheoreticalElementary-Science ” (so-called).— Yours faithfully,
H. H. D ’A r c h y A d a m s .
R u d d im a n J o h n s t o n , E s q ., F.R.G.S.,
24 Pall Mall, S.W.
P-S.— I enclose a small brochure, etc., on the Zetetic side for yourperusal and future reference.
T H E E A R T H ’S R O T U N D IT Y .
To the Editor of the “ Morning Herald.”
Will you kindly oblige two of your young readers by informing
them in how many ways has the earth been proved to be round (a globe) ?
L a u r e l , June 15.
M. B. T.

,

57

F L A T -E A R T H PH IL O S O P H Y .
To the Editor of the “ Morning Herald.”Your remarks in to-day’s issue anent “ The Earth’s Rotundity ” areutterly misleading. They will help the cause of a “ Plane Earth ” inevery thoughtful mind. Why not go to the top of the curve and lookin all directions? Your observer is uniformly on the one side of the topof the earth! (2) Do you mean to say that a ship of, say 100 feetelevation, can be seen coming up or going down over a globe 25,000
miles in circumference ? Has perspective nothing to do with it ? (3).
And as to the shadow of the earth on the moon, why, the moon has
many times been eclipsed before sunset!
No, sir ; the globular theorists have not a leg to stand upon.
W il l ia m

C arpen ter.

T H E G U L F STREAM.
To the Editor of the “ Morning Herald.”
Can you inform a reader of your paper whether there is a scientificexplanation of the cause of the Gulf Stream.
[There are several theories to account for the Gulf Stream. One
is that the motion of the earth causes the water, which is more mobile
than the land, to pile up, as it were, in the Caribbean Sea, from which
it flows out around the Florida peninsula, the motion of the earth
keeping the current near the Atlantic Coast. The Gulf Stream has
been a fruitful subject of speculation and there are many theories as toits cause.]
CAUSE OF T H E G U L F STREAM .
To the Editor of the “ Morning Herald.”
Without for a moment presuming to know the cause of the Gulf
Stream, one thing, at least, must be eliminated from the whole business

58

T H E EA RTH R EV IEW .

T H E EA RTH REV IEW .

of theoritng in the matter, and this is that the earth’s “ axial rotation ”
or “ orbital revolution ” can have anything whatever to do with thephenomenon, and this for the reason that the scientists have no evidence
ihat the earth is a globe, and, therefore, cannot speak of “ the motion of
the earth.”
B a l t im o r e , June 21.
W i l l ia m C a r p e n t e r .
Consequently they know nothing whatever about the cause of the
Gulf Stream !— E d . E.R.

ANSW ERSTO

59

CORRESPONDENTS.

A ll letters to the Editor should be briefly and l e g i b l y written on one side of thepaper only.
T hey must be accompanied by the name and address of the writer, as aguarantee of good faith.
Where replies are requested by post, the postage must be
enclosed.
The Editor does not hold himself responsible for the opinions expressedby correspondents. AH letters must be prepaid and addressed to“ E X C A L I B U R ,”c/o M r . J. W IL L IA M S ,PROFESSORW.

CARPENTER

DEAD.

“ Prof. William Carpenter died at his home, 1316 N. Central
Avenue. Since coming to Baltimore, sixteen years ago, Mr. Carpenterhas written much and lectured often on the subject of “ the Earth not a
Globe.” He was accustomed to travel around to talk about it, andwhen people would not buy his 100 Proofs that the Earth is not a
Globe, he would present them with copies in order that they might not
be deprived of the opportunity of learning that the astronomy now
being taught is all upside down. He was always thoroughly in earnest,
patient and diffuse in his method of presenting his views, and angered
only when people refused to give him a hearing. He was often to befound in front of John Hopkins’ University, the City Schools andschools in other cities, waiting to talk to the students as they came out
upon his special subject.
His death was due to a stroke of apoplexy on Sunday, August 30th.
A widow, two sons, and three daughters survive him.”— The Sun, Balti­
more, Sept. 2nd, 1896.
On another page will be found (so far as we know) his last com­munication to a newspaper.

IN

MEMORIAM.

It is with profound regret that we announce the death of
our esteemed and invaluable friend,W I L L I A M
Born at Greenwich, 1830.

C A R P E N T E R .
Died at Baltimore, U .S .A ., at

9 o’clock A .M ., Sept. 1st, 1896, aged 65 years.
W e knew, and lov’d thee,W e well knew thy worth.

32 , Bankside, L o n d o n , S.E .

C. H ari'U R asks— " I f the moon is a semi-transparent crystalline body, why does it
so completely obscure the sun when it eclipses the sun ? ’
W e commend to him
the careful perusal of “ Astronomy made Easy.” Evidently your eyesight isaffected, as many of us have stood on Old Bedford Canal Bridge and seen Welney
Bridge and objects far beyond it. This also accounts for your not being able tosee the steeple of St. Botolph Parish Church at the stated distance.
Thanks foryour reply to the questions asked Mr. Redfern K elly, F .R .A .S .
Vou haverushed in where he dare not tread, thus fulfilling the old adage !
R e v . D . N i e l d . — Thanks for the Islington Gazettn.

Whatever “ literalists ” mayteach, we are not aware that any Zetetic would be so foolish as to assert thatwhen Christ said “ I am the door of the sheep,” H e meant he was a literal doorof wood, painted and varnished, with a handle, lock, key, and brass knocker on.
Such an interpretation is akin to blasphemy, and deserves the righteous contemptof every Christian. W e should like to know what such Scriptures has to do witheither a globular or plane earth. But why quote Psalm xix. 4-6. Is it true,literally true, that the sun “ does not get to an end, it does not stop when it getsto the West, but continues its race, making its circuit.”
Then, the sun does
actually move ? Joshua was right, then, when he, in the power of inspiration,said, “ Sun, stand thou still.”
Sir Isaac Newton, then, has led the world tobelieve a lie, has he not ? H e, in The Principia, says the sun is “ i m m o v a b l e . ”
Surely it is against all reason and logic to assert that an i m m o v a b l e object moves.
Sir VV. Herschel. by his “ discovery of the M O T IO N O F T H E S U N towards
the constellation Hercules,” shook the very foundation of Modern Astronomy, andthereby proved that; the pretty pictures of “ concentric circles” are utterly un­true, being merely conjectures to bolster up foregone conclusions deducted frompurely speculative premises.

TO OUR READERS.
D e a r F r i e n d s , — W e regret to state that our efforts to issue this Journal Monthly
has not met with the response of our friends as it should have done, therefore in
future it will be issued once a Quarter. A New Cover will be selected, and it w ill be
conducted by “ E X C A L I B U R .” Price 3d. post free.
It will not necessarily be
issued on the First or Second Months of the Quarter— that will depend upon thefunds in hand.

W ith our next issue we shall enclose to those whose Subscriptions are due aprinted notice to that effect, and we trust that our friends will remit at their earliest
moment, as our funds are very low.
Those who do N O T respond to the “ Second
Notice,” we must consider as having withdrawn from the Society. Therefore, if you
cannot send the full amount of your Subscription, send what you can. See 2 Cor.
viii. t2.

6o

T H E EA RTH R EV IEW .

C O N T E N T S O F O U R L E T T E R BOX.
Halifax.

D eak L e o C a s t l e , — I am glad to hear of
the American experiments proving " Paral­lax” right,as they must of necessity,for truthis unchangeable and P. was certainly rightin his determination of Earth’s position andwater level, i.e. horizontal. I can’t help
but feel regret that our old friend andchampion, Carpenter, has passed from our
midst. I shall ever respect his memory as
one who loved the truth as he found it in
the word of God and in Nature, l i t him
have a place- in our next issue, and our
sympathies as a society deeply expressed tothe bereaved widow and family. H e wasa practical, consistent, constant and en­thusiastic Zetetic.
Would to God there
were thousands like him. [Here, here, Ed.]
Kindest regards, from all to all, hoping
soon to see you.— Yours as ever,J o h n S m it h .

The American experiments referred towill appear in our columns as soon as
possible.— E d .
D e a r S i r ,— I was indeed most sorry tohear of M r Carpenter’s death. W e were
early friends of the Zetetic cause, and it
never had a more sterling or a cuter
critic than he.
H is book “ Common
Sense ” on Astronomy as a piece ofnegative criticism has never had, and pro­bably never will have, an equal much lessa superior.
Jam es N a ylo r .
D e a r S i r , — I sincerely hope the Earth
Review will continue to appear monthly.
The quotations in the Articles on Gravita
tion are very valuable.
The letters,“ declined with thanks,” & c., are also
very interesting. Newspaper editors areevidently afraid to assist in the exposureof the forlorn condition of modern astronomy by publishing them. How much
longer are our great “ Scientists ” goingto keep up the farce of pretending to beunited in opposing all anti-Newtonian
views ? “ Parallax ” refers to the “ smouldering scepticism ” which they have in.
duced in the hearts of Christian andJewish believers, but it may well be per­haps that, although not CiWBEgSED to'their opponents, or even to each other,
this same “ smouldering scepticism''
actually exists deep down in T h e i r Own
H e a r t . The damaging admissions andconfessions made by some of the morecandid and honest amongst those who are
considered to be in the front rank of“ Science,” which the RmUw so usefully
brings to the notice of the public fromtime to time, indicate the dry rot of longstanding which (because mostly hidden
from, and therefore not suspected by, thelatter) works silently and inevitably to thecoming great revolution in science which
is probably nearer than any have imagined,
when this lying and monstrous system ofastronomy, impudently labelled “ themost exact of the sciences,’’will collapse allalong the line— suddenly, and without
remedy ! T he sneers and defiance hurledby them at those who maintain thePlaneist truths are thus by no means to beconsidered as the measure of failurt of thework of the Zetetic Society in under­
mining the astronomical “ articles ” ofNewtonian “ faith.” How often doe»seeming failure and defeat turn out to be
victory— absolute and complete— A t t s u

ED ITO R IAL

A ll !

Joh n B r a d l e y .

N O TIC E S.

tS" Please to ask for “ T he Earth— not a G lobe— Review,” at all Newsagents,
Reading Rooms, and Railway Bookstalls.
T o be had direct from the Hon. S e c .,post free, to any address in the postal union for is per year, in advance.
A ll monies for the Society must be paid direct to the local V ice Secretaries, ordirect to the Hon. Secretary and Treasurer, John Williams. Post Office Orders to be,made payable at Sumner Street, S .E .

-THE-

^ARTH™TAGLOBE-J^£YI£\\f
SIX

MILES.

“ Parallax” proving the Surface of Water to be Horizontal.
V fl/ .T Y lTan. - Ahtrcfi

H O R I Z O N T A L I T Y D IS P R O V E S C O N V E X IT Y .
The practical demonstrations of “ Parallax,” the founder ofZetetic Astronomy, were no hole and corner doings. Many similar
experiments have been made by others over canals, rivers, seas, etc., invarious parts of the world, and all confirm the fact, the surface of all
standing water, or water at rest, is horizontal.
ERGO.
The world is not a rotating globe and we living on the outside held
on by “ gravitation,” neither is it an “ hollow sphere ” and we live insideof it on a concave surface.
The various systems of theoretical science, viewed either from acommon sense, a practical, or a Scriptural standpoint of criticism, prove
themselves by their own self-stultifications and contradictions to beutterly untrue! And the only object of exponents appears to benothing more or less than self-aggrandizement. Their silence whenchallenged for proofs of their theories proves the fallaciousness of theirteaching and their consciousness of the fact.
Preachers, lecturers, and all intelligent and practical men in theworld should be interested in this discussion. Ignorance of real facts
is a disgrace to our pretended civilization and a slur upon our Chris­tianity, and can only be obliterated by an honest and candid yielding
through practical investigations to the claims of the voice of God in
Nature. This mode, and this alone, will, or can strictly accord withand confirm the utterances of Holy Writ, proving thereby that the God
of Nature is the God of the Bible, and that they are the voice of theLord our God speaking unto us, and teaching us His Truth.