Angel Code
By Craig Paardekooper (23rd July 2023)

There is much evidence that living things are the product of intelligent design – which you can find here – intelligent
design. However, my intention is to go a step further – and look at the coding systems used by our putative creators.
What you will see, described here, is Angel Code – numbering and counting systems employed by those entrustedwith the creation of life on earth.
This knowledge may open doors to further understanding.

Boot-CampTo begin with I must describe some concepts about DNA and the genetic code for those who are newbies. You canrelax because the concepts are no more difficult to understand than using a recipe.

The Building Blocks : Amino-acids
Your body is made of amino-acid molecules, which are the building blocks of all living things. There are 20 different
amino-acids, each one being different in size, weight and structure. So there are 20 different building blocks that“nature” uses to create you, or a giraffe or a sponge or a sparrow.

Stringing Them Together
These amino-acids must be strung together in a particular order to make the different organs and mechanisms ofyour body. When amino-acids are connected together into a string we call them proteins. So a protein is just a stringof amino-acids.
It is important that the amino-acids are connected in the right order, otherwise the organs that are built from themwill not function properly. The instructions for connecting the amino-acids in the correct order are found in your DNA
and in the RNA derived from it.
So DNA is like a recipe – a list of instructions telling your body what amino-acids to make and the order in which toattach them.

Instructions : DNAThe instructions are in the form of DNA or RNA. These consist of a long string of letters. There are only 4 different
letters in DNA – T, C, A, and G. Similarly there are only 4 different letters in RNA – U, C, A, and G. Here is an exampleof some DNA.
A machine in your body called a ribosome can read the instructions, and uses the information to connect aminoacids in the correct order to make proteins. It’s a bit like a factory – instructions enter at one end, the ribosome reads
each group of 3 letters – gathers the corresponding amino-acid, and connects it to the growing string of amino-acids
to make a protein.

The Genetic Code : Translating DNA or RNA into Amino acids
The genetic code is the system used by the ribosome to translate DNA or RNA into amino-acids.

Your RNA is made up of only 4 different letters – U, C, A, and G. Your ribosomes read your RNA in groups of 3
successive letters at a time. You can think of these groups of 3 letters as words, but technically they are calledcodons.
There are only 64 possible words or codons that can be made from 4 different letters (4 x 4 x 4), and each of thesecodons or words codes for a particular amino-acid.
The genetic code table is simply a table listing all of the 64 different 3-letter codes, and listing the amino-acid theycode for. That’s it. It’s that simple. If you want to know which amino-acid will be produced you simply look at the 3
letters in the RNA, and use the genetic code to see which amino-acid is coded for by those 3 letters.
There are a total of 64 different 3-letter combinations that can be made from the 4 letters U, C, A, G. The genetic
code table shows all 64 of the 3-letter combinations, and shows the amino-acid that is coded for by each one.
You probably noticed that not all of the 3-letter codes code for amino-acids – some of them code for a STOP signal,
which tells the ribosome to stop adding amino-acids to a string.

The Nature of CodeA code is something that stands for more than what it is. It embodies information about something other than itself.
For example, a book contains a story, but the story is not determined by the properties of the paper and ink uponwhich it is written – the story is about more than the medium that holds it.
In the same way, the story of your life is written by you, upon the medium of your physical existence, but notdetermined by it.
When the discrete masses of the amino-acids are combined in ways determined by the natural divisions within theGenetic Code Table, then they form unexpected patterns of balance and mathematical sequence. The amino-acids
are just the ink – it’s their arrangement in accord with the genetic code table that gives rise to unforeseen patterns –just as words manifest on paper when the ink is arranged in a certain way.
You will see that the arrangements of the amino-acids embody
1. Balance
2. Multiples of 37
3. Angel Numbers
111, 222, 333, 444, 555, 666, 777, 888, 999, 1110

Angel Numbers
This is simply a term that is commonly used to refer to any three digit number where all the digits are the same. See
Angel Numbers - Google Search

Patterns
Previously, Vernon Jenkins, discovered a mathematical pattern encoded within the Hebrew text of the Old Testamentcreation narratives. His work is displayed here –Vernon Jenkins
I was impressed by the mathematical consistency of the patterns that Vernon discovered. The patterns in Genesis
were quite clear and consistent, so I reasoned that these patterns were unlikely to be the product of chance, and sowere probably put into the narrative deliberately by some intelligent agent – human of otherwise. I surmised that if
God had encoded the patterns in the creation narrative, then perhaps the patterns would also manifest in the things
that God supposedly created – i.e. in the living things He made.
In our generation we have become familiar with the genetic code as the repository of all the information andinstructions necessary for life, so my attention turned to the genetic code to see if Vernon's patterns were foundthere.
Initially I sent out an email to Vernon, Iain Strachnan and Richard McGough asking them if they were aware of any
occurrence of Vernon's patterns in the newly published human genome. Nothing came to light, and for a few months
I allowed my thoughts about the subject to gather dust.
Then, as 2006 drew to an end, I decided to start looking myself. I soon discovered that over the last decade manyscientists have begun exploring curious mathematical patterns found within DNA.
Vernon's pattern was intriguing, and it served as a key, guiding my search – a map, as it were, suggesting what I might
find, and where to probe deeper....

January 2007 : In January of 2007 I came across the work of Shcherbak, a mathematician and geneticist. Shcherbak
had written several papers on a recurring mathematical pattern that he had found in the genetic code. I obtained hispapers at the British Library, and made a careful study of them - and produced a simplified booklet that I published
online. You can find this linked to below. What was quite surprising was the resemblance between Shcherbak'sgenetic patterns and those found by Vernon in the creation narratives. Shcherbak’s papers can be read here –Arithmetic Inside the Universal Genetic Code
Wow Signal
I remember the moment I saw the similarity – the world appeared in a new light, and, as commonly happens with aparadigm shift, everything felt different.
I wrote a short booklet about Shcherbak’s findings here –Genetic Patterns
February 2007 : In February 2007 I created a website where I gathered a bibliography of current research on
mathematical patterns within the genetic code, and sent this information to Vernon Jenkins, Richard McGough andIain Strachnan. Vernon has since independently investigated and peer reviewed Shcherbak's findings. He has
confirmed these resemblances and has created his own web page where the findings are clearly depicted Revelation of a Biological Abacus
February 2010 : Three years passed by, then in February 2010, prompted by Steve Coneglan to carry on searching, I
made a study of the work of another geneticist - M. M. Rakocevic. The resemblances between Rakocevic's genetic
patterns and those in the creation narratives was surprising. Rakocevic’s paper can be read here –Rakocevic Paper
Rakocevic's Table
December 2010 : In early December 2010, I became aware of the extraordinary research of Jean Claude Perez, aFrench geneticist and mathematician. He went beyond looking at the Genetic Code, and instead counted thefrequency of each codon in the human genome. He found that there was an unexplained balance between thefrequency of any codon and that of its mirror image.
Perez’s Paper
Jean Claude Perez and Balances in the Frequency of Codons

See also - Perez

I investigated Perez’s findings, and confirmed that the mathematical balances occur. Using computer software, I fed
the raw DNA into a computer algorithm that looped through each chromosome and counted the frequency of eachcodon in that chromosome. I found that the frequency of any codon was indeed the same as its reverse compliment(mirror). See here –
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Codon Balances in DNA
Mathematical Balances in DNA - Experiment 1
Mathematical Balances in DNA - Experiment 2
Mathematical Balances in DNA - Experiment 3
Mathematical Balances in DNA - Experiment 4
Software Code (Vb.net) for Counting Codons

I also found that when the codons were arranged in accordance with the genetic code table, the frequencies of thecodons belonging to opposite faces of the cube always summed to the same
7.
8.

Genetic Code as a Rubik Cube of Codon Counts"Rubik Cube Found in Human DNA

March 4th 2011 : I received a copy of a paper written by Stephen Coneglan. Stephen had taken a deeper look at
Rakocevic's table and had rearranged the amino acids by their chemical properties so that they are symmetricallyplaced. When Stephen did this he found that the numerical pattern that emerged possessed precise symmetry bothvertically and horizontally. Here is a link to his paper –•Stephen Coneglan and the Table of Aminoacids

An Expectation
Jean Claude Perez found a striking mathematical equality between the frequency of any codon (codng and noncoding) and its reverse compliment (mirror). I also found that the frequency of codons occupying opposite faces of agenetic code cube always sum to the same total, regardless of the genome being counted. So we have some grounds
for expecting further mathematical anomalies pointing to an arithmetic precursor to life.

A Series of Keys that Unlock the Book of Life
Based on the patterns found by Shcherbak within the genetic code, we can hypothesise that DNA may also embody
similar mathematical patterns. In order to investigate this, we must first list the parameters that give rise toShcherbak’s patterns –1. The patterns are mass sums of the unique parts of amino-acids
2. Mass sums are found within specific groups of amino-acids –a. Group 1V Degeneracy vs Groups I, II, and III
b. Pyramidines and Purines summed separately
c. Inner rows and inner columns as a single sum
d. Outer rows and outer columns as a single sum
e. Amino-acids with two identical bases as a single sum
f. Amino-acids with 3 identical bases and amino-acids with 3 unique bases as a single sum
These are the “conditions” that gave rise to Shcherbak’s patterns. It follows that if we are to detect these patterns in
raw DNA, we must apply the same “conditions”. What I am suggesting is that these “conditions” are like algorithms,or keys, and each key must be applied to unlock the book of life.

Between Start and Stop
A further condition is that the patterns may be confined to the coding regions of DNA, i.e. those regions coding forprotein synthesis because Shcherbak’s patterns are found within the genetic code – the primary purpose of which is protein synthesis.
Shcherbak’s patterns relate to the combined masses of amino-acids – the building blocks of protein
synthesis
3. One of Shcherbak’s patterns appears to be a semantic message – an instruction
1.
2.

An Instruction ?
Amino acids divided into two groups –1.
2.

Those with degeneracy IV
Those with degeneracy III, II and I

Within each group, the amino acids are ordered by ascending molecular mass. The codons for these two groups are
as follows –Read horizontally :Reading along the central row in the lower group is perfectly symmetrical – a palindrome
GT AGT AAA AAA TGA TG
And the corresponding amino acids sum to 222
This sequence can also be read as
G TAG TAA AAA ATG ATG
And the corresponding amino acids also sum to 222

Read vertically :Reading from top to bottom, the corresponding amino acids sum to 1110 + 1110 = 2220

Read Semantically :In the genetic code –••the STOP signals are TAA, TGA, TAG
the START signal is ATG

So our 222 sequence can be read as G - STOP – STOP - AAA – START - START
We know that the genetic code applies to coding regions, and coding regions always begin with a START signal andend with a STOP signal. Is this pattern instructing us – to only apply the code between START and STOP ?

Guanine Cap and the Poly AAA Tail
When DNA is transcribed into RNA, two additional things are always added –1.
2.

A Guanine Cap (G) is added to the START of the RNA
A poly-AAA tail is added to the END of the RNA

It is therefore curious that our sequence embodies these very two things, once again suggesting that the code ismeant to be applied to coding regions – from its beginning to its end.
G TAG TAA AAA ATG ATG
Gcap – STOP – STOP - Poly-AAA-tail – START - START

Eukaryotic pre-mRNA processing | RNA splicing (article) | Khan Academy••

When we start transcription the first thing added is the G-Cap
When we stop transcription, the last thing added is the poly-AAA-tailTesting the Hypothesis
Therefore, the initial test will be to analyse the coding regions of DNA only, for the reasons specified above. Initially, Iwill define a coding sequence as any sequence that begins with a START signal (MET) and ends with a STOP signal.

A Method
I will create software that can loop through coding DNA, (any sequence that begins with a START SIGNAL and ends
with a STOP SIGNAL), and sums the amino-acid masses for Pyramidines, and separately sums the amino-acid masses
for Purines.
As the software loops through the DNA and sums the masses, the occurrence of multiples of 37 and Angel Numbers
will be recorded and their distribution will be examined.
I will do the same for non-coding regions, and compare the results for both.

Summary
The genetic code table, the amino-acid table, and raw DNA itself, each demonstrate a degree of mathematicalbalance and mathematical sequencing that is unexpected, given the supposed random origin of life.
These repeating patterns and balances seem to show that an agent/s possessing arithmetical ability played a part in
the origins of life – even prior to the first cell.
The repeated manifestation of specific multiples of 37 and triple digit “Angel Numbers” suggest that these may alsoorganise raw DNA. A computer analysis may reveal if this is the case. Computer science can help decipher this AngelCode, which may lead to further discoveries in DNA..

Dear Craig,
thank for your longstanding interest to my research. You
have attached two articles. Article by Stephen Coneglan
updates 5x4 table of 20 canonical amino acids published by
Miloje Rakocevic in JTB while your article gives geometricalinterpretation to these results. I think that Miloje Rakocevic
finding became even more brilliant due to your scrupulous
research.
However, pure mathematical approach to the genetic codeand its numerical parameters threatens to be the scholastic
one. To avoid scholasticism I try, for example, to interpret myresults as instruction on possible universal arithmetic
grammar of genomes. By the way, I recommend you to pay
attention to the second Chargaff's rule (see attachedarticles). This phenomenon and its total power may be acontinuation of the genetic code arithmetical order, this timein genomes. Therefore we – I and my young colleague Maxim
Makukov – are searching now for analogous numericalgrammar in genomes.
There are two squared numbers of total sum 2x37^2=2738 inyour articles. On the other hand there is equation
12^2+35^2=37^2 among Pythagorean numbers. I would liketo ask you and Stephen: is it possible to bisect regularly 5x4table and its total sum producing the same equations
12^2+35^2=37^2 and 12^2+35^2=37^2? I ask this question
because the genetic code has shown already the firstPythagorean number.
Yours sincerely
Vladimir Shcherbak

The articles attached to the letter relate toChargaff’s second rule – namely theenigmatic mirroring of the frequency ofcodons with their reverse compliments.
Buelher Article
Okamura Article
Chargaff’s second rule is the same
phenomenon highlighted by Jean Claude
Perez. Perez’s Paper
Shcherbak suggests that it is within thisphenomenon that I might find anoccurrence of his patterns - within thegenomes of all living creatures.