2015 Hanoi Internship Report

July 13-15, 2015
SUSTEP ProgramJDS Special Program
University of Tsukuba(in collaboration with the Delft University of Technology and the Hanoi University of Natural
Resources and Environment)

I. Outline
This field trip was designed to examine pressing environmental issues in Vietnam, especially as they
pertain to water management, climate change, environmental policies, and environmental
disaster/adaptation/mitigation. The activities during the trip were mainly divided into two components:(1) participation in the international collaborative workshop among the Hanoi University of Natural
Resources and Environment (HUNRE), the Delft University of Technology (TUD, The Netherlands), andthe University of Tsukuba; and (2) a field visit to the Day River area with experts and students from Delftand HUNRE. The former activity was to exchange research ideas among University of Tsukuba students,
Dutch experts and Vietnamese participants for further discussion regarding how scientists may better deal
with some of environmental problems that are discussed in the seminar. The latter activity aimed to
identify pressing matters in the field and then examine how further research activities may help better
mitigate or solve these matters. In short, what we expected to achieve through this trip was to develop
three salient skills among participants: (1) identifying pressing problems from observation and listening,(2) placing the identified local environmental problems within a global context, and (3) formulating
opinion about the possibility of solving the problems. The essays that are included in this final reportdemonstrate that the above objectives are broadly met.
The students' essays focused on three topics: (1) water pollution, (2) water treatment, and (3)waste management. Their discussions in the essays are largely based on their field observation, which was
aided by excellent guide by young HUNRE students and staff. With Delft experts (Dr Martine Rutten and
Dr Maurits Ertsen), some of our students also visited several local farmers (both adults and children)
along the river and asked about their use of water as well as disposal practices. Some also keenly
observed waste disposal conditions in rural areas. From a very limited time they had for interview andfield observation in general, they collected a good amount of information and developed interesting
insights for solutions. Their insights also reflect their backgrounds to some extent. These students are verymuch familiar with similar environmental conditions as they grew up in some developing countries. Someof them worked for their governments for several years and observed similar conditions in different partsof their countries. At the University of Tsukuba they also took courses about waste management and thewater environment among many others that are related to environmental issues. This means that the
combination of some course works and field exercises do help students to develop more in-depth
academic insights in identifying problem areas and proposing some possible solutions.
This field trip was made possible by a number of people. Drs Maurits Ertsen and Marine Ruttenof the Delft University of Technology were instrumental in arranging our workshop at HUNRE. Dr Pham
Quy Nhan, Vice President of HUNRE, also spent the whole day with us in the workshop. He helped
arrange his staff and students to help Tsukuba students for three days. Also, Ms Ngan Vu Thi Thuy,
invaluable staff member of HUNRE's Department of Science, Technology, and International Cooperation,
did much of preparatory arrangement for us. Without her help, this trip could not have materialized.
Finally, I would like to acknowledge that this trip was partly funded by the JDS special program grant of
the Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Kenichi Matsui,
SUSTEP Program chair
University of Tsukuba

II. Schedule
Date
7/13

7/14

7/15

Route
Narita(10:00) toHanoi(13:35)
VN311
Hanoi

Places to Visit
Cau Giay Hotel
Hanoi city area

Activities & Notes
Take Narita Express Bus leaving
Tsukuba at 5:50am. Meet at thebus terminal at 5:40am. Seat
reservation is needed.

HUNRE
Department of Science, Technology& International Cooperation
41 Phudien, Bac-Tuliem, Hanoi

See attached program for theworkshop

Hanoi
Day River

Day River area

Day River excursion

HUNRE

See attached program for theworkshop

8/16
8/17

Hanoi
(7:45) to
Haneda(15:05)

Leave Cau Giay hotel at 5am.

III. Workshop Program
WORKSHOP PROGRAM ON
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENT
Hanoi, 14-16 July, 2015
1, Time: from 14 to 16 of July, 2015
2, Venue: Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment
41 Phudien road, North – TuLiem, Hanoi.
3, Participants: about 25-30 people- Lecturers and students, HUNRE; WRU; HCMUNRE- Lecturers and students, Tsukuba- Lectuers from Tu-Delft
Time
July 14th 2015
9.00 – 9.30
9.30 – 11.30

13.00 – 14.45

Activities

Responsibility

WelcomePresentation from HUNRE:- Brief introduction of HUNRE- Overview of Day river area incl. Water resources and its
situation/problems.

HUNRE
Prof. Nhan

Lunch
Presentation from Tsukuba University:- Brief introduction of Tsukuba University- Wishes from this workshop and experiences to be share.

HUNRE
Prof. Matsui
Kenichi15.00 – 16.00

Presentation from Delft University:- Brief introduction of Delft University.
- Experiences on Water sector from the research project inViet Nam and other countries in ASEAN

16.00 – 17.00

Discussion about excursion activities/group topics, etc
Guidance for field trip on 15 of July, 20159.30 – 16.30

July 15th, 2015
Day river excursion

9.30 – 11.30

July 16th, 2015
- Exercise on the field excursion

13.30 – 16.00
16.00 – 16.30
16.30 – 17 00

Lunch- Group discussion- Presentation of exercise on the field trip
Closing remark
Opening discussion for future collaboration(Business working )Prof. Maurit

Participants

HUNRE, Tu-Delft,
Tsukuba
Participants

HUNRE, Tu-Delft,
TsukubaField Study on Current Domestic Polluting Activities of Water Bodies andRestoration
Renugapathy Kandiah
The international internship to Vietnam took place from 13 July to 17 July 2015 in Hanoi, and its
suburban areas. There were 13 students from the SUSTEP program guided by Prof. Kenichi Matsui. The
Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment (HUNRE), the Delft University of Technology,
and the University of Tsukuba collaboratively organized the workshop and field trip.
The main purposes of this internship were to identify local environmental problems, place themwithin global context, and suggest solutions to the problems. These outstanding skills were expected to
be developed through the seminar, field excursion to problem-focal areas and discussions. These activities
are largely related to water management.
On the first day, 14 July 2015, the seminar was held at HUNRE. The academics introduced theiracademic curricula on environmental studies in their universities. The students from the University ofTsukuba presented specific water related experiences from their countries, and the discussion followed
towards the feasible solutions. The students were divided into seven groups to analyze different topics inthe field trip.
On the following day, the field excursion was made to observe local socio-economic issues. The
field observation focused on the identification of environmental problems that are to be discussed further
in class on the third day. The discussions that followed on the last day resulted into presentation by eachgroup. Each group received comments from other students and academics. My group presented about the‘Impacts of domestic pollution on water bodies.’
Introduction
The Hanoi is located in the Red River Basin. The annual rainfall of Hanoi is about 1,600mm and 85
percent of the rainfall occurs from May to October. The main water resources are groundwater andsurface water.
The ground water is mainly used for domestic purposes. The extraction of groundwater began in
1909. The groundwater is mainly extracted by tube wells. Some studies suggested that the Holocene
aquifer pollution in Hanoi was accelerated by the wastewater disposal of domestic and industrial activities
without treatment. In addition, the Holocene aquifer is considerably contaminated with heavy metals likemercury and arsenic largely due to natural conditions.
The surface water sources are mainly from rivers and lakes. The Red River is originated in China.
The Day and Lo rivers are connected with the Red River in Hanoi. Because Hanoi is located within thefloodplain of the Red River, flood is likely to occur in most rainy seasons such as July and August in
upstream region.

Source:
http://baobab.elet.polimi.it/iwrmwi
ki/IMRR:Reconnaissance/en#Decis
ion-making_at_planning_level

	
  
	
  
Source:http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/
v5/n9/fig_tab/ngeo1540_f1.html	  Source:http://baobab.elet.polimi.it/iwrmwiki/IMRR:WP3.3
thestakeholders/en#citeref-fig:day_ret_area_59-0

	  To mitigate damage from the flood in Hanoi during the rainy season, Day Dam was built in 1937 acrossthe Day River. This meant to prevent the flooding from running into the Day River. This Van Coc
Reservoir was designed to store the flood water.
Observations
During our field excursion to sites B, C, D and F as indicated in the map below, our group made thefollowing observations. These field observations shown in the table directed us to make theinterpretations to predict the feasible solutions on the theme of my group -‘Impacts of domestic pollution
on water bodies’.

Source:https://www.google.co.jp/maps/place/Hanoi	
  

No

Place

Observations

PhotosInterpretation

01

B

Waste and wastewater were
found in the reservoir. There isno flow in the water and its
surface was covered with water
hyacinth(Eichhornia crassipes).

The pollutants areaccumulated byleachate from solid
waste dumping andemission of waste
water fromsurrounding area.

02

C

The domestic or industrial
cleaning activity also occurred inriverside.
From the right bank of the Red
River, the technical measurementof river velocity was conducted.
At that time, sand transportationby ships (approximately 30
load/hr) was also observed long
the river.

The cleaning activity
increases the pollutants
into riverwater.
The sand transportation
by fuel engines have thepossiblity for oil
pollution and continuous
sand mining also affectthe river’s environment

03

D

On the left bank we observed
eroded conditions. Duck rearing
was observed in the riverside.

This kind of activities
increases the organic
pollutants.

04

F-The bank of the Tich Giang river
was used to raise cow, poultry.
No prevention activities against
discharging poultry wastes intoriver were observed.
Local people have about 200
birds in their poultry farm. Theyuse chicken faecal waste as
fertilizer.
-The leachate from farms runs
into ponds inside their premises
and to the river.
-During the interview withpeople, the following facts wereobtained: they use groundwater.
-Due to the polluted condition,
they are not keen to use riverwater for domestic needs. They
identify contamination of their
groundwater on colour change.
-One elder also told that the waterlevel in the river is not enough.
Local people are not aware ofwater pollutants or their origins.

-The runoffs in rainnydays washout theorganic matters fromthis riveside farms,
and leachate directly
into river and increases
the BOD (Biological
Oxygen Demand).
Increasing BOD effectthe water polltion.

	  -The people could able
to predict the polluted
status from thephysical characters.
-There was no awareon chemical or / andscientific relation
between the emision ofpollutants and groundwater pollution.

05

My insight and observation
The organic matter in the river
was likely accelerating by
domestic activities like faecal
wastes, which highly containnitrogen.

Water pollution in thefield survey river area
may be increasing
BOD by organic
matter runoff.

Discussion
The farmers who live along rivers economically depend on livestock rearing like poultry and cattle. Some
farmers use faecal wastes from their farms as fertilizer. Some have ponds on their premises to store waterfor raising poultry and fish. The groundwater is used for domestic purposes and river water is only used
for agriculture and domestic or industrial cleaning.
Although local people are aware of the polluted status of the river, they are not aware of the root causes,
parts of which are related to their activities. To reduce pollution in the river, the following policy options
can be considered:
1. The scientific findings are explained in simplest way to reach the public so that local farmers canimagine the future situation of water pollution. This work can be enhanced through rural people's
local networks. From catering businesses to handicraft making activities, women we met at riversides
were good at networking. Therefore, this networking ability can be used for environmental education.
2. After establishing the local awareness, the attempts to create a policy should be undertaken
3. The policy making process normally carries out from top-level to root level due to the convenience toimplementation. But, this kind of environmental related policy making should be carried out by
incorporating with relevant stakeholders especially key persons from the people.
4. The different levels of openness, approaches, and tools like explaining sustainable benefits of thepolicy should be transparently transformed to public and then, the public compliance should beobtained before implementation.
5. To be successful policy making, the policy should be weaved based on the scientific, feasible andsocial aspects. If the policy will be made as above method, it will be easily understood by root leveland followed.
Therefore, the initiative for policy making to solve this environmental issue should be made parallel to theawareness through populist ways to public in order to change their attitude.
References
1. Dieka Postma and etal (2012), Ground water arsenic concentrations in Vietnam controlled by
sediment age, Nature Geoscience, vol 5. www.nature.com/naturegeoscience
2. Nguyen Van Dan and Nguyen Thi Dzung (2002), Ground Water Pollution in the Hanoi Area, Vietnam.
3. http://baobab.elet.polimi.it/iwrmwiki/IMRR:Reconnaissance/en#Decision-making_at_planning_level
4. http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v5/n9/fig_tab/ngeo1540_f1.html
5. https://www.google.co.jp/maps/place/Hanoi

Improving water quality in Day River, VIETNANSEVERE Yves Edouard
From 13 to 17 January 2015, students of the University of Tsukuba took part in a Seminar and field trip in
Hanoi, Vietnam. This trip is part of its SUSTEP program activities. This field trip was designed to
examine/analyze pressing environmental issues in Vietnam. This activity was divided into two parts:
1. - A workshop with the Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment (HUNRE),
The Delft University of Technology (TUD, The Netherlands), and the University of Tsukuba. The main
purpose was to exchange research ideas between students from the University of Tsukuba, Dutch experts
and Vietnamese participants (students and researchers) regarding how scientist may better deal with water
problems.
2. - A field visit to the Day River watershed.
Each student was assign to:a. - Identify a pressing problem from observation and listeningb. - Identify a local environmental problem within a global context
c. - Propose a sustainable solution or strategy a better to achieve its goal.
Several groups were organized with several topics including the causes of pollution of the Day
River, the bad exploitation of underground water through wells, the causes of the reduction of water flowin the river, and pollution of the Day River by households and industries. We visited several locations
along the Day River, and it was also an opportunity for Vietnamese students (HUNRE, WRU and
HCMURE) to proceed with the practical exercises of water quality control (e.g., arsenic, iron). Reports
from these groups focused on four aspects: 1.- problems, 2.- causes, 3.- effects, 4.- solutions.

Among the topics that were discussed in theworkshop, I would like to highlight some aspects ofhousehold and industrial water pollution with some
pragmatic solutions in mind.

Background:
Vietnam has relatively abundant water resources witha dense river network consisting of 2,372 rivers,
including 13 large river basins. The total annual river flow volume is approximately 847 billion m3(MONRE, 2006a). In addition groundwater resources were relatively
abundant with an estimated (volume of 48 m3 / year (ADB, 2007, 2008a,
2008b).
These water resources have been playing very important roles in thedevelopment of the country. Thus, water resources have long beenrecognized as a key resource for the socio-economic development of thecountry, managing this vital resource becomes a critical task to ensure thenation’s well being and sustainability.
CausesDay River, like most rivers in Vietnam are polluted due to a large amountof household and industrial wastes according to the Institute of Natural
Resources and Environment. In addition Wastewater from hospitals andbreeding sector have been daily flowing into the rivers.
Effects
Day River is now too polluted to be used, this has negative impacts on
domestic water supplies, agricultural production and aquatic life.
Biological pollutants
The Day River is important source of irrigation water in agriculture.
Crops that are irrigated with river water include rice, beans, corn leafy vegetables and fruits are exposure
to biological pollutants.
Appropriate preparation of food crops prior to consumption can eliminate the exposure pathways of
biological pollutant (Vuong et al. in prep b). In Day River young children and adolescents mainly conduct
recreational activities including swimming and fishing. These recreational activities can increase thelikelihood of exposure to pollutants through skin contact with water and sediment
Chemical pollutants
The general population may be exposed to lead in ambient air, foods, drinking water, soil, and dust.
Segments of the general population at highest risk of health effects from lead exposure are preschool-age
children and pregnant women and their fetuses. Lead exposure may also cause anemia. At high levels of
exposure, lead can severely damage the brain and kidneys in adults or children and ultimately cause death.
In pregnant women, high levels of exposure to lead may cause miscarriage. High-level exposure in men
can damage the organs responsible for sperm production (ATSDR, 2005).
Solutions:
To reduce the pollution of the Day River, it is highly recommended that:

-The Vietnamese government promotes awareness of water pollution among local communities.
- The government should target the most heavily polluting industry sectors. Each of the top polluting
industry sectors should be required to prepare environmental management plans with take a product life
cycle and integrated pollution management approach.
-The government encourages companies/factories/hospitals to build new sewage system-The Vietnamese government provides waste management technology to the people living along the river
including the collection of solid waste and the selection of additional landfill sites.
- The government encourages farmers to practice manure management system. High manure application
rates can improve soil fertility and soil physical properties.
-Local authorities must ensure that all wastewater from companies and hospitals have to be treated before
being discharged into rivers.
- The government has to install clean water supply system in all stations along the Day River.
- The government authorities make constant monitoring to assess water quality.
- The government has to setup an area-based model, which can more readily handle seasonal variationand economic growth for projecting future pollution pressures.
- In long-term, integrate the information from the Day River experience and widen the scope to inform
policy at a national scale of implementation.
References:
Integrated Water resources Management in Vietnam under the challenges of climate change.
Pham Quy Giang: www.Ennrjournal.com
Vietnam faces river pollution
Vietnam news
Day/Nhue River basin pollution sources study
ICEM - The International Centre for Environmental Management
Department of Water Resources Management,
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
December 2007
Recycling of livestock manure in a whole-farm perspectiveS.O. Petersen,S.G. Sommer,F. Béline,C.
Burton,J. Dach,J.Y. Dourmad,A. Leip,T. Misselbrook,F. Nicholson,H.D. Poulsen,G. Provolo,P.
Sørensen,B. Vinnerås,A. Weiske,M.-P. Bernal,R. Böhm,C. Juhász,R. MihelicLivestock
ScienceElsevierDecember 2007

About arsenic contamination of groundwater in Vietnam
ZHAO ZIWEN
1. Background
1.1 Arsenic
Arsenic, as a non-metallic element, is often concentrated in groundwater. Arsenic has both natural andanthropogenic origins. From natural origins, arsenic is associated with sulphurous minerals of sulphur,iron and various other metals. Arsenic is also generated by human activities through, for example,
precious metals mining, pharmaceutical manufacturing, wood processing, glassmaking, electronics
manufacturing, and chemical production. [1]
1.2 Effects on human healthArsenic is classified as a human carcinogen and known as the “King of Poisons” because of its highmutagenic, carcinogenic, and teratogenic characteristics[2]. According to some references, 99% of human
exposure to arsenic is through ingestion: 70% is from food and 29% is from water[3, 4]. Once ingested,
arsenic continues to bio-accumulate in the body[4]. Remarkable percentages (10–20%) of people
examined in Bihar (India) and Bangladesh were identified to have skin lesions and cancers bound witharsenic exposure. Other types of cancers such as liver, lung, and bladder were also observed among thepeople who had high arsenic exposure.[5]As for the reason of causing disease, arsenic inhibits more than 200 enzymes in human cells andaffects proteins function in various mechanisms of the body [6]. Because arsenic in groundwater is themain source of human exposure, this report will focus on arsenic contamination of groundwater in
Vietnam.
2. Arsenic contamination in Vietnam
2.1 Current Situation
Vietnam, located in Southeast Asia, is an agricultural country with a population of 88 million. The
residents are concentrated mainly in the Red River Delta in the North and in the Mekong River Delta in
the South [5]. In the Hanoi region, groundwater that is pumped by household tube wells is commonlyused as drinking water, bathing and washing without high quality treatment. This was confirmed in ourinvestigation at one villager's house in Para-urban Hanoi.
Around the Red River Delta in Vietnam, Berget and others [7] found elevated varied levels of As
concentrations (up to 3050 mg/L) in groundwater, which are above the WHO (World HealthOrganization) drinking water guideline (10 mg/L). These levels are comparable to those in Bangladesh
and West Bengal, India. Berget et al. also found that approximately 11 million people depend on
groundwater from the delta areas as their main water source.
Around the Mekong River Delta, more than 40% of tube wells contained greater than 100 µg/L ofarsenic, with a range up to 1610 µg/L[4]. This level of concentration is almost three times higher than thesafe determined by the WHO.
The extensive use of groundwater for crops and drinking water is a huge issue because these tworiver systems have extremely high arsenic concentration. Although there is a base of natural arsenic
contamination in groundwater due to natural geochemical sources, the primary source of thecontamination problem for Vietnam is anthropogenic. This spike of arsenic in groundwater must be
quickly reduced; especially it has a serious impact on human living and environmental sustainability.
2.2 Reasons for arsenic contamination

Firstly, the soil layers in Vietnam, like most of South-East Asia, derive its sediments from the Himalayasthat were washed down to the Mekong and Red River deltas by rainfall. While, these arsenic richsediments are absorbed into neo-formed iron oxides.[8] Secondly, since the late 1900’s, Vietnamese
farmers have used arsenicals such as monosodium methane arsenate, disodium methane arsenate as pest
control for crops in rural areas. These chemicals also account for a large part of arsenic sources. Thirdly,
due to poor wastewater and waste management, plenty of greywater and refuse flows into the river andare deposited in the alluvial deltas, creating an organic reducing condition that promotes the release ofarsenicals from soil layer to groundwater[9].
3. Solutions for arsenic contamination
In order to solve arsenic contamination, it is important to conduct more research and measure arsenic
concentration in groundwater in all cities. These concentrations of arsenic, matched up with the average
income of the surrounding population, must be taken into account in building drinking water treatment
system and a relatively lower standard groundwater system for crop production.
Then, constructing and completing sewage system is an effective and ultimate means to control
water environment pollution in urban area, especially trace metal. Besides, more appropriate and modern
technologies need to be introduced or developed on mitigating arsenic contamination, like sand filtration
systems with co-precipitation which are considered as one of the most effective treatment systems, orIntegrated Agriculture-Aquaculture system.
Next, instead of the high toxicity of conventional pesticides in agriculture, control pesticide
environmental pollution. Simultaneously, research and develop new agrochemicals. As the local
government, subsidies and corresponding improving affordability are their obligations and responsibilities.
Finally, the government needs to place emphasis on educating the population of the dangers ofarsenic in groundwater near their homes, in their drinking water. And improve consciousness ofprotecting the water environment and their physical health.
4. Conclusions
In regard to arsenic contamination, it is far from enough to introduce or develop some kinds of modern
technologies or improve some specific aspects. Instead, the cooperation and consociation of individuals,
family, enterprise and government is the key to the problem, even most of environmental issues. Increaseof personal income and national economy; improvement of personal qualifications and corporate social
responsibility; certainly, the formulation of government policies is indispensable.
Reference1.
Lievremont, D., P.N. Bertin, and M.C. Lett, Arsenic in contaminated waters: biogeochemical
cycle, microbial metabolism and biotreatment processes. Biochimie, 2009. 91(10): p. 1229-37.
2.
Altug, T., Introduction to Toxicology and Food. . CRC Press LLC, New York,, 2003.
3.
Harte, e.a., Toxics A to Z. . University of California Press.Berkeley. , 1991.: p. Pp. 217 – 221. .
4.
Nguyen, P.K., “Geochemical Study of Arsenic Behavior in Aquifer of the Mekong Delta,
Vietnam.”. A dissertation for a Degree of Doctor of Engineering in Kyushu University. , 2008.
5.
Agusa, T., et al., Human exposure to arsenic from drinking water in Vietnam. Sci Total Environ,2014. 488-489: p. 562-9.
6.
Agusa, T., et al., Contamination by arsenic and other trace elements in tube-well water and its
risk assessment to humans in Hanoi, Vietnam. Environ Pollut, 2006. 139(1): p. 95-106.
7.
MICHAELBERG, HONGCONTRAN Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater and Drinking
Water in Vietnam: A Human Health Threat. 2001.
8.
Jessen, S., “Groundwater Arsenic in the Red River Delta, Vietnam: Regional distribution, release,mobility, and mitigation options.”. PhD Thesis for Department of Environmental Engineering
Technical University of Denmark. , November, 2009.
9.
Norrman, J., et al., Tracing sources of ammonium in reducing groundwater in a well field in
Hanoi (Vietnam) by means of stable nitrogen isotope (δ15N) values. Applied Geochemistry, 2015.
61: p. 248-258.

Possibility to reduce an intensive groundwater pumping and illegal wastewater discharge in
Vietnam
Enkhbold Bayarmaa
Vietnam is one of the countries with serious water pollution problems (Anwarul et al, 2009). For example,
arsenic contamination is becoming wider in both surface and groundwater. About seven million
inhabitants use groundwater that is contaminated with arsenic and other pollutants in Vietnam (Winkel etal, 2011). According to Suwal, almost 80% of total diseases are caused by polluted water (Suwal, 2015).
Although the Vietnamese government has taken measures to provide safe water from pollution in the pastfew decades, there has not been significant improvement partly because of a shortage of appropriate
policy and management. The country is also short of physical infrastructure and financial capacity (Suwal,2015). The main cause of water pollution is related to intensive groundwater pumping and illegal directdischarge from households and industries into natural drainage (Van Dan, 2002). Additionally, Vietnam
is a flood prone country, and when it happens, contaminated water spread throughout the affected areathat poses inhabitants’ health risks (Suwal, 2015).
In my observation of field trip in the Day River valley in Hanoi, Vietnam, I came up with thefollowing ideas as part of the solutions to water pollution. These can be taken at four levels – grassroot,
institutional, governmental and international.
Grassroot level: I think that one of the most important steps for water management is to change
public awareness and their relationship to nature. In order to reach this goal, the public participation inany pro-environmental activity is very important. Also, regular training should be conducted by scientist
in a way that captures interests among the wider public with different interests. For example, scientificorganizations may conduct field trips to communities in the watershed like the Day River valley, checkwater pollution levels together with local participants and show them the result of analysis. Then
communities may be aware of high level of river pollution and its potential negative results that could
impact the environment and human health. Therefore, the local participants and researchers discuss about
solution and propose to work together with the government. For example, during the field trip in the Day
River valley, I identified that the local people illegally discharge wastewater to the river directly because
they prefer using groundwater only. Thus, communities should demand the government to financially
support the construction of the pipeline system and water treatment facility. Also, local people can create
ditches for discharging wastewater with the other inhabitants by forming an environment community. I
hope this approach could be effective.
Institutional level: Scientists and researchers should always be supported from the government
to conduct survey and provide updated data. I believe that successful and sustainable policies are based onsolid scientific data. Therefore, the government should ensure research institutions to participate in theimplementation of every environmental conservation activity. Moreover, scientists should educate
governmental officials and young generations to raise their awareness of nature protection.
Governmental level: The Vietnamese government should strengthen the policy and monitoring
system against illegal wastewater discharge and intensive groundwater pumping. State and local levelgovernments should also ensure that inhabitants comply with the laws and regulations. Moreover,endeavouring cooperation with international donor organizations to implement promising projects andprograms that address water quality improvement is very important. For example, NGOs and aidorganizations can help construct new water purification and wastewater treatment plants with thepipelines for water delivery and wastewater discharge. Also, learning from the best experiences of otherdeveloped countries significantly benefits Vietnamese water management. Moreover, there should be
encouragement and discouragement systems. As for encouragement, if someone initiates a significant
pollution mitigation practice, he or she will receive benefits from the government. As for discouragement,
if someone illegally discharges pollutants, he or she should be punished strictly.
International level: Dr. Pham Quy Nhan of the Hanoi University of Natural Resources andEnvironment (HUNRE) said in his presentation on July 13 that “Sixty percent of river flows from outsideof Vietnam”. Therefore, integrated water management should take into account international contexts.
The countries that use international rivers should formulate and implement a long-term joint program forwater conservation. For example, they may conduct a regular joint monitoring and assessment aboutwater quality and its safety. Also, they may organize a regular international conference to exchange
information about their best practices that are beneficial for further sustainable cooperation on water
management.
In conclusion, water pollution we observed during our Vietnam internship is one of the very
serious environmental problems in developing countries. It could cause terrible consequences to humanheath in Vietnam in the future. Even though the government has been taking some measures against waterpollution, there has not been significant improvement. However, those four steps are mentioned above inseparate, they should be connected and implemented together in order to receive successful achievements.
I believe my four recommendations may provide some answer to these problems.

Reference
Anwarul Abedin, T. K. (2009). Remedition of Natural Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater Using Zero
Valent Iron. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University .
Hanh, T. T. (2010). Water Utilization and Efficiency in Vietnam, the Challenges and Solutions. Ministryof Natural Recources and Environment , Vietnam.
Lenny H.E.Winkel, P. T. (2011). Arsenic Pollution of Groundwater in Vietnam exacerbated by deep
aquifer exploitation for more than a century . PNAS.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ,1246-1251.
Nguyen Van Dan, N. T. (2002, 12 10). Groundwater Pollution in the Hanoi Area, Vietnam. Hanoi,
Vietnam: Internation Water Management Institute.
Suwal, S. (2015). Water in crises-Vietnam. Retrieved 08 05, 2015, from The water project:
http://thewaterproject.org/water-in-crisis-vietnam

Wastewater treatment problem and solution of Hanoi
Hoang Phan Bich Ngoc
With a growing number of inhabitants together with rapid urban sprawl, Hanoi has to deal with theincreasing amount of wastes. However, the process of wastewater treatment, which is one of the mosturgent tasks in environmental protection, is still undervalued. This report will review some general
information about the source of wastewater, the disposal network, waste treatment policy in Hanoi. I alsosuggest my own ideas for solution on these problems.
1. Source of wastewater in Hanoi
The main sources of wastewater in Hanoi are domestic wastewater, hospital wastewater andindustrial wastewater (Nguyen, 2013). The main source of BOD founded in natural water bodies isderived from domestic wastewater with 161.22 tons/days, following by industrial wastewater with 60.782
tons/day (Table 1).
Table 1: Estimated total pollution load of wastewater source in Hanoi.
BOD (Tons/day)Domestic wastewater
161.22
Hospital wastewater
0.912
Industrial wastewater
60.782
Source: Duong, 2013
2. Wastewater disposal system in Hanoi
Hanoi’s sewerage and drainage systems constructed from 1905 to 1945. These old systems coveran area of 1,000 ha. in the central part of the old city, meaning only 35-40% the Hanoi citizen benefit
from these systems (Ngo, 2009).
In general, there are three ways to treat the wastewater in Hanoi: through septic tanks, water
borne sewers and on-site systems (Figure 1). The Hanoi Sewerage and Drainage Company (SADCO)
manage wastewater treatment. Septic tanks are used to treat household wastewater before going to thedrainage system. Industries and other communal houses have their own wastewater treatment facility
before disposing wastewater to the public system. The water collected from this system or storm water
can be used to clean streets. However, as only 40% of the Hanoi population benefit from the city
sewerage system, the other 60% of citizens simply dispose their waste water directly to rivers and theponds (Ngo, 2009).
In addition, City’s sewerage channels are inappropriately designed. The low-slope channels
accumulate a large amount of sludge and sediment in the systems. In areas such as Ba Dinh and Hoan
Kiem, the sewerage system has not been upgraded since the first half of the twentieth century, and thecarrying capacity cannot meet the increasing demand, due to the recent rapid growth of the population(Ngo, 2009).
Furthermore, since the storm water also flows into these old channels, there is a typical seasonal
flood in Hanoi during the rainy season, resulting in environmental pollution, traffic accidents and othersocial problems.

Septic	
  tanks	
  Public	  toilet	
  Septic	  tanks	  Individual	
  household	
  Communal	
  house	  Septic	  tanks	  Grey	
  water	  Septic	  banks	
  Secondary	
  and	
  primary	  network	
  managed	  by	
  SADCO	  Tertiary	
  network	
  managed	
  by	
  local	
  authority	
  and	
  community	
  Agriculture	
  practice	
  Fish	
  pond	  Wastewater	
  reuse	  in	
  par-­‐urban	
  districts	
  by	
  farmer	  Figure	  1:	
  Sewerage	  and	
  d rainage	
  system	
  in	
  Hanoi.	
  Source:	
  Ngo,	
  2009	  The wastewater is often reused for agriculture in para-urban. With nutrient content, this water
may be suitable for agriculture irrigation and plant growing. However, the municipal wastewater also
carries inorganic substances, toxic elements (1.09 - 2.14 µg Cd L-1, 0.16 - 0.33 mg Cu L-1, 2.75 - 4.02 µg
Pb L-1, 0.20 - 0.34 mg Zn L-1 and 0.22 - 0.44 mg Mn L-1) and heavy metal (Chu et al, 2010). This willaffect the soil quality and increase health risk to consumers.
3. The wastewater treatment in Hanoi
My group could not find the specific data about treatment facility in communal houses (industrial
and hospital), but we found the result of an inspection of industrial zones. This information reveals thestatus of the industrial treatment in Vietnam (Figure 2).

100%	
  

34	
  

67	
  
287	
  

80%	
  
60%	
  

100	
  

196	
  
314	
  

40%	
  
20%	
  

Standard	
  

113	
  

246	
  

2006	
  

2007	
  

Under-­‐standard	
  No-­‐treatment	
  

203	
  

0%	
  
2008	
  

Figure 2: Inspection results of industrial zones in Vietnam. Source: Nguyen, 2010
According to the inspection, more industrial zone are equipped with treatment systems meetingthe environmental standard. The number of zones without treatment dropped. However, the number of‘under standard’ zones still remain to be the majority (approximately 37%). This limited progress largely
owes to low-investment, installing and maintaining treatment facilities. In addition, it owes to a lack ofprofessional staff and low awareness of industrial owners and operators about the important of waste
management. The situation is similar at hospitals. According to Nguyen’s study in 2010, less than 50% of
hospitals had established wastewater facilities. Even with wastewater treatment facilities, their capacity is
low and normally does the environmental standard.
4. Policy in wastewater treatment
Currently, there are many regulations on wastewater management such as the Law on
Environmental Protection (revised) (2005), Government Decree No. 67/2003, Decree No. 04/2007:
Environmental fee for industrial wastewater; Government Decree Nos. 59, 88, 115/2007 and Prime
Minister’s Decision Nos 1929 & 1930, Orientation for Urban and Industrial Water Supply andWastewater Development (Technical Regulation-2009). There are overlaps and gaps in these regulations,especially concerning management responsibilities among different ministries and agencies. Thus, a newplan, ‘The unified sanitation sector strategy and action plan’ (U3SAP), was initiated in 2005 and proposes
to the government in 2007. The objective was to remove the overlaps and inconsistencies in legislation, toestablish an effective coordination in environmental activities, to improve sanitation of both rural andurban areas and to achieve the targets of existing strategies (e.g. National rural clean water supply andsanitation strategy) (Nguyen, 2011).
In my opinion, the sewerage should be included in this plan. The network of pipes and drains
should be upgraded and modified in order to satisfy the demand of the increasing population. Furthermore,with the upgrading of drainage system, the treatment plant could operate better with their designed
capacity.
In conclusion, the domestic water systems in Vietnam is very complicated and required great
effort to cope with the growing population, rapid urbanization and the low level of public awareness. The
legislation relating to water should be consistent and clear, giving the local and central authorities thepower to enforce and control flood, pollution and drinking water. Furthermore, I believe that the central
authority should improve the sewerage and drainable systems wastewater facilities in order to theflooding in the raining seasons.
4. Main findings during the intership
The target of our intership in Viet Nam is finding an environmental problem and then bring out
some solutions for this problem. After two working days, my group focuses on the water usage of Thuy
Xuan Tien commune, Chuong My district.
During one day of observation and interviewing with local people, my group found that:
4.1 Problem of water usage
There is not the tap water system and sewerage in this village. All of the households in thisvillage use the ground water by digging the well. Each well costs from 4 to 5 million VND ( 200-250 $)and it will be used for 7-10 years. Although, the water here is polluted by daily activities andcontaminated by Fe from nearby industry factory, the water is not treated or simply treated before using.
Moreover, this village is located near the cancer- village where has more than 70% of residents get cancer
due to the water pollution.

	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
	
  Picture	
  1:	
  A	
  household’s	
  well	
  	
  

	
  

	
  

Picture	  2:	
  Treatment	
  of	
  drinking	
  water	
  by	
  household	
  

	
  

4.2 Policy suggestion
My group has two parts for the solution to improve the quality of water for local people. They aretechnical and policy suggestions. In this report, I will mention about some policy suggestion.
- It is necessary to have a local well management committee. This committee will have a clear
understanding of local situation, since then, they can bring out appropriate solutions to ensure thequality of water as well as the effect in using well.
- The water filter system in each well must be installed in order to reduce the contamination. The
local committee can help the household in installing and instruction in using this.
- There must have the regulation in the minimum depth limit level to make a well, depending the
ground and the regulation in quality inspection.
Thanks to my fieldtrip in Viet Nam, I also to have a chance to work and talk with many guests
and professors from many places in both technical and policy aspects.

REFERENCE:

1. An Thuan Do, Keisuke Kuroda, Takeshi Hayashi, Tran Thi Viet Nga, Kumiko Oguma
and Satoshi Takizawa; Household survey of installation and treatment efficiency ofpoint-of-use water treatment systems in Hanoi, Vietnam; Water Supply: Research andTechnology, 2014.
2. Chu Anh Dao, Pham Manh Con, Nguyen Manh Khai, Characteristic of urban wastewater in
Hanoi City – nutritive value and potential risk in using for agriculture, VNU Journal of Science,
Earth Sciences 26 (2010).
3. Duong Thanh An, Wastewater management and sanitation practices in Vietnam, 2013, assessed
date: December 15th 2014, URL: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/5Waste%20water%20management%20and%20sanitation%20practices%20in%20Viet%20Nam.pdf

4. Hawaco (Hanoi Water Company), History, assessed date 2014 December 22th, URL:
http://hawacom.vn/?p=2199 , translated by us.
5. Michael Berg , Pham Thi Kim Trang, Caroline Stengel, Johanna Buschmann, Pham HungViet, Nguyen Van Dan, Walter Giger, Doris Stüben, Hydrological and sedimentary
controls leading to arsenic contamination of groundwater in the Hanoi area, Vietnam:
The impact of iron-arsenic ratios, peat, river bank deposits, and excessive groundwater
abstraction, Chemical Geology, 2008.
6. New England interstate water pollution control commission, Sequencing Batch reactor design andoperational considerations, 2005.
7. Ngo Thi Thanh Van, The existing sewage and drainage system in Hanoi, Tu International, 2009.
8. Nguyen Cong Thinh, The unified sanitation sector strategy and action plant (U3SAP) for Vietnam,
in conference Sewerage & wastewater treatment in Southeast Asia – Toward sustainable
development, 2011.
9. Nguyen Hoang Anh, Wastewater management and treatment in urban areas in Vietnam, 2011,assessed date: December 15th 2014, URL: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/5Waste%20water%20management%20and%20sanitation%20practices%20in%20Viet%20Nam.pdf10. Nguyen Viet Anh, Overview of Sanitation and Wastewater Management in Vietnamese urban
sector, in training workshop “Strategic planning for integrated urban wastewater management”,
Ha Noi, 10/2010.
11. Tuoi tre, Bring in to the court, pipe water from Da river broken 9 times in 3 years, assessed date2014 December 22th, URL: http://tuoitre.vn/tin/phap-luat/20140729/khoi-to-vu-an-9-lan-voduong-ong-nuoc-song-da/628012.html .

12. VN media, Close the landfill contaminated to water resource in Da river, assessed date2014 December 22th, URL: http://vnmedia.vn/VN/xa-hoi/do-thi/dong-cua-bai-rac-gay-onhiem-nguon-nuoc-song-da-96-3276691.html, translated by author.

Increasing the Citizens’ Awareness and Avoiding from Illegal Dumping ofWastesEnkhbat Oyuntselmeg
In Vietnam, illegal dumping is one of the environmental priority issues that need to be regulated.
According to the USEPA, an illegal dumping is defined as the disposal of solid and liquid wastes in anunpermitted area. Generally wastes are illegally dumped to avoid paying disposal fees required forappropriate disposal (Region 5, 1998). Illegal dumping or so-called “open dumping” also mostly occurs
due to a lack of appropriate policy and inadequate local control and monitoring in Vietnam. So far as it
depends on people’s lack of awareness on environmental protection, river water quality especially isaffected by open dumping from industries and householders.
During the fieldtrip in the river areas of Hanoi city, we observed that human activities haveseriously polluted surface water. For instance, water in the Day, Red, Tich rivers we visited, is locallypolluted by solid wastes and untreated waste water. Solid and liquid wastes are directly discharged into
the rivers. According to Thi Van Le Khoa (2015), waste water from craft villages is discharged into therivers and it comprises 4% of total waste water of the whole river basin. And the solid waste is disposedin an indiscriminate manner to river or lake banks. The domestic waste comprises 80% of the total
amount of solid waste. As for the domestic waste water, Hanoi and Ha Tay contributes 71% of total
amount. However, there are many other factors that affect river water quality. In this report, I will
examine illegal household dumping in the rivershed. I will also consider possible ways to improve
citizens’ awareness on water and environmental conservation.
In the group discussion of the July workshop in Vietnam, our group discussed about why illegal
dumping occurs, and what roles stakeholders play in this problem. We identified a few root causes. First,
communities we visited in the watersheds of the Red, Day, and Tich rivers, there are no appropriate
places to collect wastes. The piled solid wastes were observed along the rivershed. We also learned that
there is a lack of water treatment facilities. The waste water from industries was being directly discharged
into the Tick River. Although the Vietnamese government has promulgated law and regulations, theirimplementation mechanism is yet very inadequate. For example, there is no control and punishment for
those waste disposal sites. Moreover, citizens do not seem to be well-informed about water andenvironmental conservation. So there is a need for an integrated approach among scientists, central
government, local government, and local communities to educate local residents about the importance ofwater conservation and proper waste disposal.
In case of stakeholders’ cooperation for water conservation, the role of residents’ perception andattitude is significant. Here researchers can help update monitoring data about water quality in thoserivers and report the results to the government authority. Local governments can also monitor water
quality by following monitoring standards that are established under central government regulations.
They should apply an appropriate waste management mechanism with proper waste collection method.
Also the local government should motivate local people’s participation in waste management and pay
more attention to increasing the public awareness.
The question as to why citizens are not well-informed about water conservation so poor is also
important to be considered. The reasons could be explained as people do not understand well about whatenvironmental conservation is, what the benefits are of protecting nature and, what negative impacts will
happen in the future after dumping wastes into rivers. In my opinion, improving citizens’ understanding is
the most significant priority work to be done in order to decrease water pollution and preserve nature.
Considering this situation, I developed the following recommendations for a local government
to enhance citizens’ knowledge and awareness:

To educate people on environmental conservation by providing training programs toyoung children. Of course, adults need to be involved in the training program, but it isimportant to make children acquire perceptions and habitats at an early humandevelopment stage.
To make convincing advertisement against illegal dumping. In order to convince people,
the local government could do different kinds of advertisement such as making signs,
documentary videos, brochures, and using television.
To organize the public outreach program. For example, the Vietnamese government candesignate one certain day of each month as a national cleanup day. And if the local
government could organize some other activities it will help to increase the citizens’
participation.
To implement a rewarding system. For example, Dallas County in the U.S. has offered a
24-hour hotline (1-888-335-DUMP) for citizens to report illegal dumping. Citizens are
asked to inform about violators and places where illegal dumping occurred. As amotivation to report illegal dumping, the county government offered a $50 reward to theinformant whose information led to an arrest (the EPA Web, 2014). I think this is a good
example to encourage citizens' participation.
In conclusion, citizens’ awareness and participations are important steps in fighting against illegal
dumping, and sustaining and protecting the environment. So the local government’s program against
illegal dumping should begin by changing citizens’ lifestyle tendency.

References:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 (USEPA Region 5). 1998. Illegal Dumping Prevention
Guidebook. EPA-B-97-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Chicago, IL.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency Web. 2014. Illegal dumping control. Accessed
August 4, 2015.
Thi Van Le Khoa, 2015. Challenges of Sustainable Water Resources Development in Nhue-Day River
Basin. Workshop Program on Integrated Management of Water and Environment, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Maintaining Water Sustainability through the Proper Waste Management
System in Hanoi, Vietnam
Moreen Bimali Weerasuriya
Hanoi city has encountered many problems related to water pollution and mismanagement. To namesome, these problems include a lack of safe drinking water, eutrophication, ground water contaminationand salt intrusion. This report will briefly discuss some aspects of these water pollution problems that areclosely related to improper or illegal waste discharge. I will also make recommendations for
improvements.
Some studies have shown that inadequate facilities along with a lack of proper waste collection
mechanism have led to illegal/in proper waste disposal by local people to the rivershed environment.
Dumping sides and waste water discharging points I observed during Vietnam internship in July 2015 hadbad odor and, water stagnation that might led to mosquito breeding (figure 1). According to thepresentation by the Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment (HUNRE) on July 14th,
about 56% of the total waste discharge per waste volume in the Day River watershed is from domestic
activities. According to Huong et al. (2011), about 92.2% of waste generated from a person is notrecycled. This means that the introduction of the proper waste collection mechanism is an urgent
requirement. The HUNRE experts further mentioned that everyday waste is collected in residential areasand street sides, but our study group did not observe any collection point along the river. Instead, freedumping appeared prominent practice. So I argue that the main reason for these problems owes toimproper waste collection mechanism.
In order to prevent pollution, the continuous monitoring system of waste disposal is essential.
From, the legal side an administrative authority for waste management can vigorously pursue legal
actions against illegal dumping. The establishment of solid waste collection bins at domestic level will
have people become involved in the waste management network. Also, kitchen waste can be recycled
through composts. Municipal governments or other bodies that are in charge of collecting solid waste candistribute a waste collection calendar for residents.
Another approach to regulate water pollution is by sectors. In the agriculture sector, animalhusbandry, which is one of the main livelihood activities, causes water pollution because livestock wastes
are not collected but left within river system (figure 2). The high nitrogen content of animal manure may
cause water eutrophication. Government support for Intensive rearing of the poultry and goose, andbiogas incinerating or fertilizer production from collected manure, or introducing of small-scale treatment
plants to manage nitrogen concentration is essential.
Since the Vietnamese economy is largely based on crop farming, changing the agricultural water
consumption pattern will be difficult within a short time. However reducing the discharge of nutrient andchemical rich water to streams can be prevented. For example, in Shanghai, China some farms plant
aquatic plants along irrigation ditches, which have the high potential to absorb chemical and nutrient.
In the industrial sector, the rapid industrialization has dramatically increased the amounts of toxic
materials in water bodies. The industrial pollution is mainly because of a lack of concern and, financial
capacity among industries to adopt treatment facilities. According to the estimate by the Ministry ofForeign Affairs of Denmark, Vietnamese industries produce an average 13, 100 tons of wastes every day,of which 20% is considered to be hazardous (2012). It is indeed important to require each company tointroduce a proper industrial waste treatment mechanism and safeguard water and the environment ingeneral. To promote this action, the Vietnamese government may introduce subsidies or loan schemes forindustry owners to establish treatment plants.

Also the government may promote further coordination among sectors and stakeholders topromote water management in Vietnam. A proper coordination between stakeholders in making an
achievable strategic plan requires the scientific studies about the amount and causes of waste generated,water quality parameters and remedial measures. Financial assistance to both local and state management
is required in initial stages.
Cooperation from the village level administration can be achieved through various
encouragement policies. For example, a rewarding system for effective waste managers will strengthen
the implementation of this coordination effort. Promotion programmes can be used to increase theawareness of the general public about restoring water bodies so that, more local residents become ready tocooperate. Mobilizing village leaders to identify local needs and necessary actions originate will clarify
priority areas for local environmental protection. Group discussions conducted during the internship withlocal people reveal that their negative perception toward the river pollution and the indeed requirement
toward rebuilding the river system. This could be used as the turning point of implementing waste
management mechanism.
Restoring of water system will help to re-cultivate the fields near dead river, increase the eco
system balance and reduce water eutrophication. As a conclusion I like to recommend that there is anindeed requirement to rebuild the water system in Hanoi immediately to maintain the environment
sustainable. According to my understanding during the internship, the central government should build aproper coordination among all stakeholder parties along with an achievable strategic plan is the mostimportant element and, from the local level well organized waste collection mechanism and community
based activities to clean the river systems are the main activities could be practiced to safeguard the river
system from illegal waste dumping in Hanoi.

Figure	
  1:	
  Waste	  Discharging	
  Points	  Figure	
  2:	
  Animal	
  Rearing	  Places	
  References
Huong, L.T.M., Kawai, K., Thai, N.T.K., 2011. Physical composition analysis of household
waste
in Hanoi. http://ambiente.okayamau.ac.jp/management/up_load_files/gakkan/2012_en/2012_en_314.pdf
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, 2012. Vietnam Solid Waste Management.
http://di.dk/SiteCollectionDocuments/DIBD/Facts%20Sheet%20%20Solid%20Waste%20Management%20-%20Delegation%20Mar2013%20(2).pdf

Integrated Management of Water and the Environment
Ailyn Rojas
Introduction
From July 14th to 16th we, students from the Master’s Program in Environmental Sciences and theDoctoral Program in Sustainable Environmental Studies of the University of Tsukuba, attended aninternational collaborative workshop with participants from the Hanoi University of Natural Resources
and Environmental and the Delft University of Technology. The main topic was related to integrated
water management in the Red and Day river watersheds.
The educational goals of the workshop were to have participants identify a specific problem,
collect information about it through a field trip and examine and propose an integral solution, whichmight consider not only environmental aspects but also social and economic ones.
During the field trip we got a better understanding on the problems of water management in the
Hanoi area. But because the approach of this workshop was about proposing an integrated solution weneeded much more information than what we could collect by just observing and measuring data in theriver. Therefore, at the last observation point of our field trip we discussed the possibility of talking withthe locals about the river usage and their respective sources, waste water and solid wastes. This shortconversation resulted in many interesting ideas that might help not only to increase the quality on the Tich
and/or Day river but also to increase people’s awareness and connection to them in a sense that will makepeople living near these rivers feel responsible and considerate to their quality and conditions.
Group Discussion Topic
During the field trip we discovered that some local people used ponds to store rain water for irrigation
purposes. The problem we found on this point is that these peoples discharge their waste water into theponds. Also, rain carries all the artificial fertilizers from the ground to the pond. After discovering this ourgroup decided to discuss the possibilities of reducing the amount of pollutants that go to the pond. Thismeans to examine a more local approach, which we hoped could help improve river quality and local’
peoples environmental awareness.
The problem source we focused on were:
1.- Chemical fertilizers.
We intended to replace chemical fertilizers with organic ones that can be produced by farmers. For
that we came up two options between which people will be able to choose.
A) Composting: The idea is to utilize animals’ manures, crops lefts overs and kitchen wastes as sources
for compost. This option is low cost, and permits farmers to save money because they no longer needto purchase chemical fertilizers although it requires time and space for its implementation.
B) Biogasification: This option also utilize animals’ manures, crops lefts overs, kitchen wastes andothers as the sources of biogas. Smalls scale biogasification plants have already been successfully
implemented in Vietnam each with a cost of approximately 100 USD, which is less costly thanbiogasification plants in other countries, where only big scale plants have been undertaken. If thissmall scale biogasification plant option is possible in other parts of Vietnam, local people can obtaingas allowing to save money.

Picture 1: Building a biogas digester in Vietnam
Picture 2: Diagram of biogas plant.
Source: Journal in Renewable Energy World, “Asia Hits the Gas”.
The secondary effect of these solutions is that they prevent animal manure from going into the riverafter rain or floods. This will reduce the amount of BOD in river and pond.
2.- Waste water discharge.
During the field trip we observed two type of household’s water discharges. One type of household
discharges wastewater to the ponds on their premises and the other to the river.
A) Discharge to ponds: In this case the solution we wanted to implement require two types of aquaticplants. One is water lily dwarf, which is already used in Vietnam. This plant is known to reduce
toxins in water and it can be used to feed ducks. Another plant is acorus calamus, which helps supply
oxygen.
B) Discharge to river: The solution, in this case, must come from the government. We propose thathouses get separated by groups according to location and point of wastewater discharge. Each group,
instead of discharging directly to the river will discharge their wastewater to a tank that contain thesame plants as in option 1. After the water runs through this plants it will be discharge to the river.
The table below shows how stakeholders implement and take responsibilities for the options
mentioned above:
Stakeholder
Government

Biodigestion
Present cost andbenefits of bio
gasification plant.
Set bioplant safety
standards and do a final
inspection for using theplant.

CompostPresent cost and benefitsof compost.
Provide training forcomposting process.

Pond/Tanks
Buy and distribute theplants to locals.
Determine location oftanks inside thecommunities.
Construct pipes andtanks.

Researcher

No responsibility but
there is an opportunity tofind biomass research
topics and investigation
subjects.

Determine the nutrientsin composts produced by
locals and help them
determine the correct ratio
between organics andchemical fertilizers if
necessary.

Determinate
effectiveness of selected
plants and propose
improvements if
necessary.

Research opportunities.

Communities
LeaderLocal People

Have to always present their results to the communities.
Link the government and researches with locals.
In charge of communicating research results and government planning, policies ornorms to locals.
In charge of communicating locals feedback to researches and government
Doing.
Inform of problems to researches.
Work together giving information to the researches or government for
improvement.

Policies and Guidelines
To have stakeholders implement and take on the responsibilities mentioned above is that the following
policies and guidelines must be implemented:
•

•

•

•

Related to implementation of solutions proposed on this program: It is recommended that the
government first implement composting, biogasification and/or wastewater treatment within
active communities. In this type of communities the communication between locals and theircommunity’s leaders is strong, therefore starting with these groups will guarantee to receive
feedback from locals through their community’s leaders to improve their solution implementation
programs before they continue in other less active communities. Finally they should include
locals that are not grouped to complete the area or city targeted.
Related to information given by the government to Communities. At the start of a solution
implementation project, locals must be informed of the cost and benefits of the treatments
mentioned above. This will increase people’s awareness and participation.
Related to standards and work with researches: Government must set
biogasification/Compost facility and operation standards and have to provide training to locals forcorrect treatment operation. They should also receive feedback from researches to improve theeffectiveness of the solutions applied.
About the flow of information: Government must inform researches and community leaders
about their role in the information flow and give specific about the what type of information isnecessary to transmit according to the treatment being implemented. It will help create a teamwork between researches and locals and also increase the connection between locals and theenvironment.

•
Conclusion and Comments
During the workshop group discussion and finally presentation of exercise on the field trip, different
integrated water management proposal for improving the water quality in one of the three rivers, Red,
Day and Tich were presented and discussed.
Our group water management proposal integrates solid waste and wastewater management with
the intention of, not only improving river water quality, but also providing locals with economical
advantages through utilizing their waste as a resource.
In Vietnam, agriculture is one of the two main economic sector and livestock industry is under adeveloping strategy to increase their production. This two economic sector provides with a stable biomasssource that can benefit the population of Vietnam if treated.
As proposed in this report, the mentioned biomass can be treated with composting or
biogasification process. The product after treatment: compost, energy and bio-slurry provide farmers withorganic fertilizer and gas for cooking or lighting. This two types of treatment prevent animal manure fromgoing into the river after rain or floods, therefore reducing the amount of BOD in river and pond. Bothoption are low cost and can be implemented in farms.
Considering the wastewater discharge to ponds or directly to the river observed during the field
trip, we proposed utilizing two plants: water lily dwarf and acorus calamus, which helps absorbing toxins
and supply oxygen. This pretreatment will help improve the quality of the waste water that will finally bedischarge to the river.

We consider this solutions to be economically affordable by locals, and with high prospect offeasibility for their implementation by the government if all the proposal policies and guidelines are
considered.
About the workshop, it helped us remember solving but wasn’t much source of new inputs aboutwater management. Although it was a good opportunity for experience integrated approach for solutions,which help our students to be more upstanding professionals.
References
Anwarul Abedin, T. K. (2009). Remedition of Natural Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater Using Zero
Valent Iron. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University .
Hanh, T. T. (2010). Water Utilization and Efficiency in Vietnam, the Challenges and Solutions. Ministryof Natural Recources and Environment , Vietnam.
Lenny H.E.Winkel, P. T. (2011). Arsenic Pollution of Groundwater in Vietnam exacerbated by deep
aquifer exploitation for more than a century . PNAS.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ,1246-1251.
Nes, W. J. (January-February 2006). Asia Hits the Gas. Renewable Energy World .
Nguyen Van Dan, N. T. (2002, 12 10). Groundwater Pollution in the Hanoi Area, Vietnam. Hanoi,
Vietnam: Internation Water Management Institute.
Suwal, S. (2015). Water in crises-Vietnam. Retrieved 08 05, 2015, from The water project:
http://thewaterproject.org/water-in-crisis-vietnam

Report of International Field Appraisal in Hanoi Vietnam about the Water
Usage Problem and Solution of the Thuy Xuan Tien Commune Chuong My
District
HE HONGYU
1. Background of study site
Our target was the village in the watershed of the Day River, and the Day River is a distributary of the
Red River. Our participation purpose was to find out the environmental problems of this village and focus
on one topic to give some solutions. Our group focused on water usage problems.
2. Problem of water usage
All households we observed used groundwater by digging wells. These people do not have access to thetap water system and sewerage system. As their water is not treated, they cannot be sure if water is safe.
Without the sewerage system, domestic waste water will be discharged into the river directly. The village
we visited did not have public toilet. The river is also contaminated by ferrum from industries.
3.Solutions
3.1 Technical suggestions
3.1.1 Treatment of drinking water

Picture 1 (One well costs 4-5million VND ( 200-250$),and the service life is 5-10 years)

Picture 2 (Purifier Water Cup, for about 1,800 yen (314 thousand VND) )The best solution to these problems is to establish the centralized water supply systems, including boththe tap water system and sewerage systems with government support. In case water treatment capacity in
Vietnam does not meet the demand, local people in remote areas may install a water purifier in every
household. Without financial support from the government, villagers need to pay by themselves; there arealso some inexpensive methods to precipitate well water. Picture 1 shows turbid well water. The villagers
can mix 50g alumen with 1 ton of water, or they can use acticarbon in the turbid water tank. After
precipitation through these methods, local people can use some purifier water cups to filtrate the water;then they will get safe drinking water.
3.1.2 Treatment of manure

Picture 3 (Manure Bag, it does not need much money)
Villagers will benefit by building private toilets with biogas tanks or establishing public toilets withbiogas tanks. This is the best way to treat manure for this village we visited. If each household establishes
biogas tanks, they can also get extra energy, and the contaminant in the river will also be reduced. Cattlewith manure bags should work well in this village, and the collected manure can be recycled in biogas
tanks. Then the sense of pleasure and comfort will be increased in the village. In many countries, horses
are required to wear manure bags on city roads. If villagers can get support from government will bebetter, especially for the biogas tanks. I think the manure bag is cheap for villagers.
3.2 Policy suggestions
I think that the villagers will benefit from establishing a local well management committee to achieve
unified water quality management by making an administrative standard. They may also get wellconstruction permits from local authorities or local committee. To reduce heavy metal contamination, thewell management committee can establish a minimum depth limit level to make a well, depending the
ground. Villagers may also want to install a water filtering system in each well. It is important to maintaina certain distance between the well and the septic tank so that well water will not be polluted by the septic
tank. The quality of well water must be inspected once a month.
4. Conclusion
Environmental protection is closely related to technology, economy and education. Technology, economy
and education are also interconnected. Technology helps the country to prevent and treat pollution and, inturn, solve environmental problems. It requires money normally, so the country's economy determines
whether or not the country can afford necessary environmental protection actions. Education empowers
the citizen with environmental awareness. It drives people to ask their government to pay attention toenvironmental protection. It also helps them cooperate with environmental protection policy. Education
nourishes the creation of technology, and technology becomes a source of money. Technology, economy
and education altogether reflect the development state of a country.
During our participation in Vietnam Internship, the professor from the Delft University ofTechnology said that we should consider Vietnamese villagers do not have much money, and they may
have hard time to get support from their local government. If so it is really challenging for us to think
about solutions. The professor also said that our suggestions sounded impracticable because most of oursuggestions focused on the need for government support. But we did give some suggestions that do not
require much money that emphasized promotion for awareness and motivation.

Water pollution on the ponds and rivers that are used for Irrigationin the Tri Thuy area
Yuan Tian
Introduction
Environmental pollution has become a serious problem in Vietnam due to the increase of factories, theimprovement of living standards by rapid development and the poor environmental awareness of citizens.
Water, as the source of living, is widely used for human living activities. Besides for drinking, water isused for doing laundry, cooking, irrigating, and so on. If water resources were severely polluted, it would
have a serious impact on human living and environmental sustainability.
Unfortunately, in most parts of Vietnam, industrial and domestic wastewater is discharged intorivers and ponds directly because of a lack of wastewater management facilities that meet rapid
industrialization and urbanization. In the rural area, wastewater from houses and farms strongly impact
the water quality of ponds and rivers.
As water problems are common issues in most developing countries, it will take a long time toperfect environmental policy, coordinate between government and stakeholders, and enhance themonitoring technology for water quality. Meanwhile, water pollution in rural areas can be relatively easier
to be solved comparing with that of urban areas.
How we find the problem
During our one-day excursion to the Day River valley, we found that farmers in the Tich River watershedalmost do not use river water for irrigation even the croplands are close to the river because the water
quality has rapidly deteriorated. Most of them have pond near their houses for rainwater collection andcropland irrigation. However, the ponds are also polluted mainly by organics from household andagricultural activities. Wastewater and solid wastes (manure and kitchen residues, etc.) that are producedby these activities directly affect the water quality of the ponds. During the rainy season, chemicalfertilizers, which contain plenty of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, also would flow into the pondswith rain, resulting in the excessive growth of algae. These pollutants would generate bad smell from theponds and visually unacceptable colors. When the polluted water is applied for irrigation, the crop
productivities would be negatively affected and soil quality also would become lower. In addition, thesolid wastes discharged into ponds would turn into sediment on the bottom of ponds, which is possible toaffect the pond depth after several years.
Technological Approach
To improve water quality in household ponds and nearby rivers, an integrated system for solid waste andwastewater disposal should be taken into consideration. For treating solid wastes from agriculture andhousehold activities, such as crop residue, manure and kitchen residue, two alternative options areavailable. One is composting. Household composts decompose organics to inorganics, which, in turn, canbe used as natural organic fertilizers for cropland. The other option is anaerobic digestion that produces
biogas for cooking. This technology has already been applied in some rural farms of Vietnam.
For cleaning pond, my study group in this internship considered the possibility of establishing asmall-scale ecosystem pond. This pond can not only provide a beautiful and odorless scenery but also
reduce the organics from households by having ecosystem functions that recycle organic wastes. This
technology generally consists of three trophic levels. The first level has producers such as aquatic plants
and autotrophs. They can utilize solar energy to produce nutrients for themselves and provide food forsecond level’s organisms. For example, water lily (Nymphaeaceae) can degrade organics, remove heavymetals in ponds and provide food for ducks. Sweet flag (Acorus Calamus), an oxygen-supplier plant, canincrease dissolved oxygen for living organisms in ponds. Its roots can be used as medicine. In the second
level there are consumers, such as insects, fishes and ducks that consume plants and tiny organisms forliving. The third level has decomposers such as, microbes that decompose dead organic matters to carbon
dioxide and nutrients that feed producers. Consequently, sediment in the ponds, normally consisted oforganics, can be reduced by microbes To maximize benefits from this system, fruit trees, which can use
the nutrients in soil of pond side, also can be planted around the ponds. Thus, farmers can get benefits
from fruits, ducks, and plant root for medicine.
From above approach, the benefits of this system could be summarized as followings:
1. As solid wastes(crop residue, manure and kitchen residue) can be composted or digested, they will
not dispose to ponds directly. The organic pollutants in ponds and sediment that may generated bysolid wastes can be reduced.
2. The extra organics can be consumed by aquatic plants and microorganisms living in ponds. In turn,the generated nutrients(N, P, etc.) and carbon dioxide can be used for living of aquatic plants andfruit trees. Thus, the eutrophication and redundant organics that can generate odor and unacceptable
colors will not happen.
3. As that mentioned before, root of sweet flag also can be used as medicine. Thus, farmers can getplenty of benefits not only from ducks and fruits produced from this system, but also from theaquatic plants.
In another word, our idea of ecosystem pond is a win-win strategy for farmers and the environment.
Monitoring Approach
In order to put this ecosystem pond into practice, coordination and cooperation among government, local
communities, scientists and local people are needed.
Firstly, government should establish standards of detailed parameters(COD, BOD5, dissolved
oxygen, etc.) for well operation of this system. Secondly, the most important and also the hardest part,
communities need to visit farmers to persuade them investing for this system. Considering poor
conditions in rural areas, government can establish a micro-credit system, in which government agentslend money to farmers to establish this pond with low interests. Thirdly, it also necessary to get assistancefrom scientists. Since the components of manure, kitchen waste and agriculture residue change withdifferent seasons, scientists can teach farmers how to monitor the elements in composted/digested solid
wastes and their usefulness as fertilizer. It could be better if local government and community cancooperate with research institutions to establish a system on the basis of local conditions for maximizing
the benefits from this system and teach farmers how to operate.
The monitoring can be done once in six months or one year to make sure that the recycled materials
are suitable for plant growth. Actually, some on-farm research about this system has already been done
before. Dang K. Nhan(2007) did many detailed research works on the role of fishpond in integrated
agriculture-aquaculture (IAA) systems in Vietnam, which can be used as a reference.
Conclusion
Our idea of technological solution is similar to the IAA system that already has met the test of history inthe highly populated regions of Asia. It has helped farmers to utilize as much household/agricultural
wastes as possible. It also has benefited farmers and the environment by using the power of nature.
Although the government may be willing to implement this kind of environmentally friendly project, we
also should be mindful about local people’s standpoint. During the process of practicing public
consultation, the government also has the opportunity to raise awareness among local people aboutprotecting the environment.
Reference[1]Pham BinhQuyen, Dang Due Nhan, Nguyen Van San, 1995. Environmental pollution in Vietnam:
analytical estimation and environmental priotiries. Trends in analytical chemistry, vol. 14.no. 8, 383-388.
[2]Dang K. Nhan, Le T. Phong, Marc J.C. Verdegem, Le T. Duong, Roel H. Bosma, David C. Little.
Integrated freshwater aquaculture, crop and livestock production in the Mekong delta, Vietnam:
Determinants and the role of the pond. Agricultural Systems, 94 (2007) 445–458.
[3]Nhan, D.K., 2007. The role of a fish pond in optimizing nutrient flows in integrated agricultureaquaculture farming systems. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands. ISBN: 978-908504-739-1[4]Hideyuki Mohri, ShrutiLahoti, Osamu Saito, AnparasanMahalingam, NimalGunatilleke, Irham, Van
Thang Hoang, GaminiHitinayake, Kazuhiko Takeuchi, SrikanthaHerath. Assessment of ecosystemservices in homegarden systems in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam. Ecosystem Services 5 (2013) e124
– e136[5]Cu ThiThien Thu, Pham Hung Cuong, Le Thuy Hang, Nguyen Van Chao, Le XuanAnh, Nguyen
XuanTrach, Sven G. Sommer. Manure management practices on biogas and non-biogas pig farms indeveloping countries e using livestock farms in Vietnam as an example. Journal of Cleaner Production 27(2012) 64-71[6]Causes of Water Pollution in Vietnam Ngoc Lien Nguyen
http://www.eslstation.net/Lab_Information/Our_Lives/Places/Water_Pollution_Vietnam.htm[7] SahisnaSuwal, Guest Writer.Water in crisis-Vietnam. The water project
http://thewaterproject.org/water-in-crisis-vietnam

Water Usage in Thuy Xuan Tien Commune, Chuong My District
Wu Yi
From what we interviewed with local people in Thuy Xuan Tien commune, we found that there are a lotof ground water problems. Our group focused on water usage in this district, especially the water qualityof the well and the treatment of livestock wastes. Firstly, we observed the following conditions about this
district.
-

All households use groundwater by digging well instead of using water from river directly.
The river water nearby is polluted by daily activities. It is also contaminated with iron (Fe) fromfactories.
The underground water is not treated before using by local people.
No public toilets exist in the neighborhood.,
Livestock graze nearby river and discharge wastes directly into river and soil directly.

So, our group provided some technical suggestions and policy suggestions.
Technical suggestions [MONRE and Ministry of Planning and Investment work together to madeplans and Ministry of Construction put into practice. Meanwhile, Local media assist to attract
attention.]
Treatment of drinking water- 1.MONRE and Ministry of Planning and Investment establish centralized water supply system(with government support)- 2.Local media encourage people to set Family water purifier (without government support)- 3.Local people buy purifier water cups
- Treatment of manure- 1.Local authorities establish some public toilets with public methane tank- 2.Each household should have a methane tank
- 3.Farmers should use livestock waste collection bags.
Policy suggestions [MONRE and Ministry of Planning and Investment establish committee andwater usage standards for local people.]-MONRE establish a new completed local well management committee-Ministry of Construction get well construction permit from local authorities-MONRE and Ministry of Planning and Investment establish a minimum depth limit level to dig a well,which depends on the ground-Ministry of Construction install water filter system in each well
-Local inspectors make sure the safe distance between the well and the methane tank
-Each well must be inspected once a month by local inspectors
In my opinion, what we should concentrate on is to apply some eco-technology and cheap
suggestions. Among the ideas we discussed, I suggest that the government (MONRE) establish a methanetank for each household and encourage local people to make livestock manure collection bags.
After conducting the on-the-spot investigation among local villagers, I realized that the urgent
matter for ground water pollution governance is not so much about requiring the government to formulaterules and regulations or provide funds to upgrade sewage treatment system. The realistic condition is thatthe government does not have enough money and will to solve water pollution problem in the Chuong My
district. Therefore, my concern is how to minimize pollution with the cheapest way under thesecircumstances.
The vast rural poor areas in China also have similar problems, and we can draw lessons from
Chinese experience. Firstly, in my knowledge, it will take about 3.5 million VND to create a methanetank for each household, which is about the same cost of digging a well in the local area. Besides, themethane tank can solve the problem of manure. It prevents manure from infiltrating into soil or river
directly. It also functions as toilet. The methane which was produced can be recycled as fertilizer and thesource of energy. Thus, in the long run, a methane tank will bring much higher yield than digging a well.
In addition, this technology has been well-established in China. Local people do not need to know muchabout how the technology works but just buy the complete set of tank equipment. It is very simple to use
this technology from China because Vietnam borders China. Thereby, I argue that this option has highfeasibility.
Secondly, one of the most important prevention methods local people need to fight against riverwater pollution in this district is to prevent livestock waste from directly entering into rivers. In my
observation, grazing animals in this area directly excrete wastes on the ground, without any processing
facility. The miscibility of manure is very strong, which can cause the loss of soil productivity. In fact,
rural areas in China also has a lot of grazing livestock. The most original and the cheapest method is to
give animals waste collection bags and then pour the collected feces into public methane tanks every day.
These relatively simple waste processing methods are highly maneuverable and low cost with highpotential economic benefits (recyclable fertilizer) to users; so I think this second option is also highly
feasible.
Vietnam and China are both developing countries, and the state of water pollution in countryside in
Vietnam and south of China is similar. So I think that two countries could work together for mutualinterest. Meanwhile, in China, local governments have established funding platforms, which could attract
local funds to be used for upgrading local sewage treatment systems. The Chinese government especiallypromotes the adoption of the PPP (Public-Private-Partnership) model in water management. As far as I
know there are a lot of foreign-capital enterprises in Vietnam; the Vietnamese government could connect
them with local authorities in charge of sewage treatment to develop some feasible items. It is a style likedouble play: funds from foreign-capital enterprises and promotion of water quality.
After all, it is necessary to strengthen global-regional cooperation/exchange, in search for common
environment improvement.