CLEAREDFor Open Publication
Jun 08, 2023
Department of Defense

OFFICE OF PREPUBLICATION AND SECURITY REVIEWANNUAL ENERGY PERFORMANCE,RESILIENCE, AND READINESS REPORT
Department of Defense
Fiscal Year 2022

COST ESTIMATEThe estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense isapproximately $258,000 in Fiscal Years 2022–2023. This includes $200,000 in
expenses and $58,000 in DoD labor. Cost estimate generated on April 20, 2023
RefID: 5-9BB3EEF.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 12.

DOD ENERGY DEMAND OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 3

3.

OPERATIONAL ENERGY ................................................................................................................................. 5
OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS AND EXPENDITURES ..........................................................................................................5
IMPLEMENTING THE OPERATIONAL ENERGY STRATEGY ..........................................................................................................6
OPERATIONAL ENERGY INITIATIVES ....................................................................................................................................6
CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................................................................................22

4.

INSTALLATION ENERGY ............................................................................................................................... 23
ENERGY RESILIENCE POLICIES AND GUIDANCE....................................................................................................................23
INSTALLATION ENERGY PLANS (IEPS): TITLE 10 U.S.C. § 2911 ...........................................................................................23
BLACK START EXERCISES (BSES) .....................................................................................................................................25
CRITICAL ENERGY CAPACITY AND AVAILABILITY: TITLE 10 U.S.C. § 2920 ...............................................................................25
UTILITY OUTAGES ON PRIVATIZED SYSTEMS: TITLE 10 U.S.C. § 2688(G)(4) ..........................................................................26
THE ENERGY RESILIENCE AND CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM (ERCIP) ......................................................................27
INSTALLATION ENERGY ALTERNATIVE FUNDING..................................................................................................................28
INSTALLATION RENEWABLE ENERGY GOALS.......................................................................................................................29
RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT DEPLOYMENT ....................................................................................................................30
FACILITY-RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS .............................................................................................................................31

APPENDIX A - LIST OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................... 33
APPENDIX B - CONGRESSIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................. 42
APPENDIX C - COMPLIANCE MATRIX .................................................................................................................... 44
APPENDIX D - ENERGY PERFORMANCE MASTER PLAN ......................................................................................... 47
APPENDIX E - DOD ENERGY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 49
APPENDIX F – FY22 OPERATIONAL ENERGY INITIATIVES ...................................................................................... 52
APPENDIX G - RECOMMENDED CHANGE IN ORGANIZATION OR AUTHORITY ...................................................... 92
APPENDIX H - INSTALLATION ENERGY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ....................................................................... 93
APPENDIX I - THIRD PARTY FINANCING AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................... 97
APPENDIX J - BRIEFING ON ENERGY RESILIENCE OF BASES SUPPORTING NUCLEAR DETERRENCE MISSIONS ....... 99
APPENDIX K - BRIEFING ON BI-DIRECTIONAL CHARGING ................................................................................... 105
APPENDIX L - BRIEFING ON WIRELESS ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING FOR MILITARY INSTALLATIONS ................ 108
APPENDIX M – BRIEFING ON FIELDING NATURAL GAS AND PROPANE GENERATORS AT MILITARY INSTALLATIONS110APPENDIX N – BRIEFING ON THE USE OF UTILITIES PRIVATIZATION TO IMPROVE ENERGY RESILIENCE ............. 113
APPENDIX O - REPORT ON MILITARY INSTALLATION GRID RESILIENCY .............................................................. 117
APPENDIX P - REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION BY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OF REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO
RENEWABLE FUEL PUMPS .................................................................................................................................. 118
APPENDIX Q – REPORT ON ELECTRIC VEHICLE INFRASTRUCTURE ...................................................................... 121

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22i

APPENDIX R - REPORT ON MAINTENANCE OF CURRENT ANALYTICAL TOOLS IN EVALUATING ENERGY RESILIENCEMEASURES ......................................................................................................................................................... 124
APPENDIX S - REPORT ON ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES AT INSTALLATIONS......................................... 125

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22ii

1. Executive Summary
The Department of Defense (DoD) is required to submit the Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, andReadiness Report (AEPRR) 1 annually to detail the Department’s energy consumption and performance
toward achieving greater energy resilience for installations and warfighting platforms.2 The DoD mustensure mission readiness is supported with resilient, reliable, clean, and efficient installation andoperational energy capabilities.
The 2022 National Defense Strategy (NDS) set the policy direction for the Department’s energy efforts
by making “reducing energy demand a priority,” and directing the Department to “adopt more efficientand clean-energy technologies that reduce logistics requirements in contested or austere environments.” 3
In addition, the President and the Secretary of Defense have directed the DoD to ensure installations andforces are resilient to all hazard risks – kinetic, cyber, and natural – and that the strategic use of energy
promotes the readiness of the armed forces for their military missions.
In Fiscal Year 2022 (FY22), the Department consumed 628,590 billion British Thermal Units (BBtus),
costing a total of $14.5 billion, to support operations and training across a worldwide set of installations
with thousands of energy consuming platforms. The DoD is the largest single energy consumer both in
the U.S. and among the Federal Government. DoD operational and installation energy consumption
represents approximately 76 percent of total Federal energy consumption, more than 14 times the totalenergy consumption of the next closest Federal agency (the United States Postal Service) 4.

Figure 1. DoD Total Energy Consumption as the Percentage of Federal Total, DoD Percentage of Total
Energy Consumption for OE and IE, and DoD Total Energy Cost in Billions for OE and IE (FY22)

1 The Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness (AEPRR) report was renamed from the Annual Energy

Management and Resilience Report (AEMRR) in the FY 2023 National Defense Authorization Act and is required tobe submitted annually by Title 10 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 2925(a).

2 “Energy Resilience” is defined as the “ability to avoid, prepare for, minimize, adapt to, and recover from anticipatedand unanticipated energy disruptions in order to ensure energy availability and reliability sufficient to provide formission assurance and readiness, including mission essential operations related to readiness, and to execute or
rapidly reestablish mission essential requirements.” Per Title 10 U.S. Code § 101(e)(6).

3 Department of Defense, National Defense Strategy, 2022. p 20
4 Calculated using FY21 energy data (Table A-1) collected annually by FEMP and available here:

https://ctsedwweb.ee.doe.gov/Annual/Report/TotalSiteDeliveredEnergyUseInAllEndUseSectorsByFederalAgencyBilli
onBtu.aspx

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY221

The DoD expended most of its energy (68 percent) on Operational Energy, the vast majority of whichcame in the form of liquid fuel. Operational energy is defined as the “energy required for training,
moving, and sustaining military forces and weapons platforms for military operations and includes energy
used by ships, aircraft, combat vehicles, and tactical power generators.” 5 In FY22, the DoD consumed
over 73 million barrels of fuel to support worldwide operations and training, with 48% of this amountpurchased outside of the U.S.
Reflecting significant effort in FY22, the DoD expects to publish a significantly revised Operational
Energy Strategy, as required by title 10 U.S.C. § 2926, in Spring of 2023. The strategy identified
initiatives across the four major lines of effort:••••

Energy Demand Reduction;
Energy Substitution and Diversification;
Supply Chain Resilience; andEnterprise-wide Energy Visibility.

To meet the challenge of logistics in contested environments, the DoD invested over $3.2 billion in FY22
to improve propulsion, upgrades to current equipment, revise operating procedures, and develop all new
platform designs. Included in these investments is over $108 million dedicated to the Operational Energy
Capability Improvement Fund (OECIF) and Operational Energy Prototyping Fund (OEPF) for advancing,demonstrating, and maturing advanced Joint technologies prior to transition to programs of record.
Installation Energy consists of the energy needed to power fixed installations and enduring locations aswell as non-tactical vehicles (NTVs). In FY22, the DoD consumed 203,531 BBtus and spentapproximately $4.2 billion on installation energy, which included $3.96 billion to power, heat, and coolbuildings; and $0.2 billion to supply fuel to the fleet of NTVs.
DoD’s installation energy strategy is designed to ensure mission assurance for the warfighter, reduceenergy costs, and improve the energy resilience of our fixed installations. 6 Major lines of effort include:
•
•
•
•
•

Energy Demand Reduction Through Conservation and Efficiency;
Expanded Use of On-Site Energy for Mission Assurance;
Improved Energy Grid and Storage Resilience of our Installations;
Advanced Technology for Energy Resource Efficiencies and Increased Security; andCybersecurity of Mission Critical Facility Related Control Systems.

In FY22, the DoD continued to invest heavily in installation energy, awarding over $400M in third party
financed contracts and $469M through Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program (ERCIP)
project funding. Both programs provide more resilient and energy efficient facility equipment andenvelope improvements as well as new installation energy infrastructure. These efforts focus on closing
critical energy gaps at priority locations through energy solution sets that include application of cybersecurity improvements, installation of field-flexible and expandable microgrids, deployment of energy
storage technologies, and the leveraging of existing renewable energy generation resources. The DoD is
strengthening its energy data collection and analysis with the steady development of data management
systems to support data-driven decision-making.

5 Per Title 10 U.S.C. § 2924(4).
6 For more information, please visit https://www.acq.osd.mil/eie/ie/FEP_index.html

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY222

2. DoD Energy Demand Overview
Operational and installation energy demand reduction is a priority for the Department. DoD’s totalenergy consumption and cost has trended downward over time since FY12 (Figure 2).

Figure 2. DoD’s Total Energy Consumption and Cost (FY12 - FY22)

Within DoD, the Department of the Air Force (DAF) was the largest consumer of operational energy in
FY22, followed by the Navy and USMC, and Army (Left, Figure 3). The Army was the largest consumerof installation energy in FY22, followed by the Navy and USMC, DAF, and the Defense Agencies (Right,
Figure 3).

Figure 3. DoD Percentage of Energy Consumption for OE and IE by Service (FY22)

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

3

DoD’s installation energy consumption mix mirrors that of the U.S. commercial sector, where natural gas
and electricity dominate the supply mix (Figure 4). 7

Figure 4. U.S. Commercial Sector vs. DoD’s Installation Energy Consumption Mix, FY22

7 U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review, Table 2.3, accessed March 20, 2023:

https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY224

3. Operational Energy
By statute, operational energy is defined as “energy required for training, moving, and sustaining militaryforces and weapons platforms for military operations,” and includes energy used by ships, aircraft,
combat vehicles, and tactical power generators.8
The significance of operational energy as an enabler of military capability is reflected in the 2022
National Defense Strategy. In alignment with the strategic environment and defense priorities, theDepartment will “make reducing energy demand a priority and seek to adopt more efficient clean-energy
technologies that reduce logistics requirements in contested or austere environments.” 9 As described inthis report, the Department’s initiatives and programs increase resilience and support enhanced range,
reach, time-on-station, and performance of the Joint Force. In FY22, the Department invested $3.2B in
initiatives to procure new or upgrade existing vehicles and aircraft, increase the range and endurance of
platforms, enhance energy resiliency at contingency bases, and plan and execute war-games to accountfor increasing risks to logistics and sustainment. As the Department prepares to operate in contested
environments around the globe, these investments increase range, endurance, and lethality while
decreasing risks to warfighters.

Operational Energy Demands and Expenditures
In FY22, the Department consumed over 73 million barrels of fuel to power ships, aircraft, combat
vehicles, and contingency bases with a total cost of $10.3 billion. To respond to the needs of a global
force, the Department purchased 48 percent of this fuel outside of the U.S.

Operational Energy Demand,
Million Barrels

Table 1. DoD Operational Energy Demand by Service 10
FY14

FY15

FY16

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23e

Army

10.1

7.3

7.1

7.6

9.2

9.0

8.1

7.3

6.1

8.0

Navy

28.2

28.5

28.5

28.4

26.0

28.1

27.9

27.0

27.5

24.2

Air Force

48.6

52.0

49.6

49

51.9

45.3

41.2

43.0

38.9

42.6

Marines

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.5

0.38

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.4

Other DoD

0.3

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.9

0.77

0.3

0.7

0.5

1.0

Total Demand

87.4

88.6

85.7

85.5

88.5

83.6

77.6

78.4

73.2

76.2

Expenditures($ Billions)

$14.0

$14.1

$8.7

$8.2

$9.1

$11.0

$9.20

$7.91

$10.30$9.12

Historical operational energy demand is based on net sales of selected liquid fuels by Defense Logistics
Agency (DLA) Energy to the Services, while future operational energy demand estimates are based on the
FY 2024 President’s Budget. Expenditures for operational energy are estimated using the average fuelsales price for the specific fuel provided to the customer at the point of sale, and include procurement and8 10 U.S.C. § 2924(4).
9 Department of Defense, National Defense Strategy, 2022. p 20.
10 Updated analysis of expenditures may lead to different results from previous Operational Energy Annual Reports.

Expenditures are not adjusted for inflation; data on historical demand may not capture final end use nor account for fueltransfers between the Services; Historical and Estimated Demand include Base and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO)
funding and purchases using Transportation Working Capital Fund (TWCF). Note: while operational energy includes more
sources other than liquid fuels, DoD lacks enterprise-wide visibility regarding demand for power in warfighting platforms; thisgap is being addressed in the Department’s recently revised OE Strategy.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

5

overhead costs. This price does not reflect additional costs imposed on the Department for force
protection, storage, and transportation beyond the point of sale. As a purchaser of fuel on the open
market, the Department is subject to the same price volatility experienced by commercial customers. 11

Implementing the Operational Energy Strategy
Section 2926(c) of title 10, U.S.C., assigns the ASD(EI&E) with the responsibility to establish andmaintain a department-wide transformational strategy for operational energy. In FY22, ODASD(E&ER)
led a Department-wide team to develop an updated Operational Energy Strategy, which is expected to besigned in Spring 2023 and meets the requirements of section 2926(e) of title 10, U.S.C. To ensure the
Joint Force can fight and win in contested environments, the Operational Energy Strategy includes fourlines of effort:••••

Energy Demand Reduction;
Energy Substitution and Diversification;
Supply Chain Resilience; andEnterprise-wide Energy Visibility.

To assist with the implementation of this new strategy, the ASD(EI&E) will utilize the Contested
Logistics Operational Energy Working Group, which was established in FY22 in accordance withsection 2926(d) of title 10, U.S.C. With senior leader representatives from the armed Services, Joint
Staff, and Combatant Commands, the working group will shape the direction and implementation of the
Operational Energy Strategy and inform future planning and programming guidance.
Subsequent annual energy reports will use the 2023 Operational Energy Strategy as the baseline for
evaluating initiatives and measuring progress in the implementation of the strategy.

Operational Energy Initiatives
The Department’s activities in operational energy are carried out by the Office of the Secretary of
Defense and its defense agencies, the Military Departments, and the Joint Staff and the CombatantCommands. Highlights of these activities are provided below and are detailed in Appendix F.
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment
In accordance with section 2926(c) of title 10, U.S.C., the ASD(EI&E) “shall oversee the operationalenergy activities of the Department of Defense,” “oversee the investments of the Department in suchactivities,” and “make recommendations to the Secretary [of Defense] regarding the policies andinvestments that affect the use of operational energy across the Department of Defense.” Through the
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Environment and Energy Resilience, the notable operationalenergy initiatives in FY22 included:•

11

Wargame Support and Analytics: ODASD(E&ER) provided subject matter expertise andanalytical support to improve the quality of decision-making in the Department. In FY22,ODASD(E&ER) participated in wargames evaluating the challenges of energy supply anddistribution in both INDOPACOM and EUCOM theaters of operation, the role of allied andpartner capabilities, and effects of climate change on the Joint Force. Staff also supported thefirst-of-a-kind wargame on red logistics to assess adversary strengths and weaknesses. Lessons

Standard DLA Energy fuel prices can be found at http://www.dla.mil/Energy/Business/StandardPrices.aspx

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

6

learned from these wargames were institutionalized through monthly participation in the Defense
Wargame Alignment Group (DWAG) and the DoD Climate Wargaming sub Working Group.
Finally, ODASD(E&ER) initiated collection and analysis of data on the role of energy in Joint
programs pursuant to guidance from the Deputy Secretary of Defense to reduce demand while
maintaining or improving operational effectiveness.
•

Energy in Requirements and Acquisition: Utilizing a review of the energy key performanceparameter, the ODASD(E&ER) supported the development and issuance of Deputy Secretary of
Defense guidance in April 2022 that directed that the “Department's capability development
activities, from requirements to acquisition to sustainment, must increase energy supportability
and must reduce energy demand across all capability solutions.” 12 Through the Climate Working
Group, ODASD(E&ER) subsequently reviewed the role of energy demand reduction andsupportability in over 60 Joint programs to support further refinements in Department-wide
requirements and acquisition decision-making in FY23.

•

Bulk Fuel Responsibilities: Based on the changes in the FY22 National Defense Authorization
Act, ODASD(E&ER) supported implementation of United States Transportation Command(USTRANSCOM) becoming the single element responsible for global bulk fuel management anddelivery (GBFMD) in support of Combatant Commander (CCDM) requirements.
ODASD(E&ER) represented OSD in the operational planning team that aligned policy toenhance prioritization and global integration of bulk fuel decision-making and determined how
Department-wide responsibilities would evolve in response to USTRANSCOM becoming thesingle manager for GBFMD. The DoD Component responsibilities for GBFMD will be formallycodified in the revision of DoD Instruction 4140.25, DoD Management Policy for Energy
Commodities and Related Services.

•

As the Single Manager, USTRANSCOM synchronizes bulk fuel posture, planning, andexecution, and advocates for resources, capabilities, and process improvements in coordination
with CCMDs, the Services, and the Defense Logistics Agency. The GBFMD mission has been
structured around closing known gaps as identified in various studies, wargames, and exercises.
In FY22, USTRANSCOM stood up the Operational Planning Team and worked with OSD, JS,
and DLA Energy to draft new UCP language for USTRANSCOM, develop an interim OSD
GBFMD Implementation Memorandum, and assist OSD in updating key issuance documents.
Additionally, USTRANSCOM developed the construct of a new staffing section, restructured the
new GBFMD governance process, and began to assess CCMD bulk fuel plans to ensure decisions
were made at the correct level for the Joint Petroleum Enterprise.

•

Prioritizing Investments in Fuel Infrastructure: In April 2022, ODASD(E&ER) developed
Department guidance, co-signed by OSD, Joint Staff, and DLA, that identified process
improvements for prioritizing and allocating funding investments in capitalized bulk fuelinfrastructure. The FY26 Installation Planning and Review Board (IPRB) reflected these newprocedures, including overarching strategic guidance from the Joint Staff J4, the prioritization of
Operational Plans (OPLANs), and requirements, posture, and project briefings from the
Combatant Commands. Future IPRB activities will reflect the role of USTRANSCOM as the
single manager for bulk fuel.

•Operational Energy Innovation: The Department utilizes the Operational Energy Capability
Improvement Fund (OECIF) to advance technology development and the Operational Energy

12 DSD Guidance, April 2022.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

7

Prototyping Fund (OEPF) to validate more mature technologies prior to transition. OECIF andthe OEPF are investing to develop new technologies and practices in three main thrust areas:oooPowering the Force will improve our ability to meet the energy needs of the current force
through efficiency, autonomy, storage, and novel energy conversion and management
technologies.
Electrifying the Battlespace provides more efficient and flexible power system options
for propulsion and defensive and offensive combat systems and provides a pathway fromliquid fuels to the electrification of combat platforms.
Commanding Energy supports technologies that use data analytics and artificial
intelligence to better understand the real-time generation, use, and distribution of energy
around a contested battlespace.

•

While OEPF is a relatively new program designed to bridge the gap toward Service transition,
OECIF programs have already achieved significant results. OECIF showed success integratingenergy-storage with tactical microgrids, championing autonomous refueling, and extending theduration of Class 2 drone operations from hours to days. OECIF also focused on longer-term,
higher-risk investments such as advancing nuclear fuel options and successfully increasing
distance and power-levels of wireless power transmissions for terrestrial and space applications.
In FY22, the nuclear fuel demonstration line neared completion and is set to begin producing fuelsupport DoD’s investment in “Project Pele,” a mobile small modular reactor under developmentby the Strategic Capabilities Office. Finally, OECIF made strides prototyping power and thermal
systems for directed energy lasers and producing hardware capable of supporting 300-500kW
laser tests.

•

Advanced Batteries: The ASD(EI&E) continued to support and participate in the Federal
Consortium for Advanced Batteries (FCAB). As advanced batteries will be critical to meeting
the increasing power needs of sensors and weapons, the FCAB’s goal of a robust domestic
industrial base for advanced batteries will be critical to ensuring a reliable, secure, and affordable
supply of energy storage for the Department. As such, ASD(EI&E) supported the developmentof a DoD Battery Strategy by the ASD for Industrial Base Policy address supply chain andwarfighting capability challenges.

Defense Logistics Agency Energy•

Single Manager Activity: As the Executive Agent for Bulk Petroleum, DLA focused on end-toend supply chain management and oversight for all DoD bulk petroleum products and systems incoordination with the DoD Components. Based on the changes in the FY22 National Defense
Authorization Act, DLA Energy supported implementation of United States Transportation
Command (USTRANSCOM) to become be the single element responsible for bulk fuelmanagement and delivery. DLA participated in the operational planning team (OPT) thatdeveloped the Global Bulk Fuel Management and Delivery (GBFMD) memorandum required by
Congress which confirms USTRANSCOM as the Single Manager for bulk petroleum andoutlines DLA’s retained Integrated Materiel Manager (IMM) responsibilities. Additionally, DLA
supported USTRANSCOM in the development and coordination of the Joint Petroleum
Executive Council (JPEC) and Joint Petroleum Steering Group (JSPG) charters. The JPSG
capitalizes upon the governance process previously led by the former Executive Agent
Component Steering Group (CSG). DLA collaborated with USTC to begin transitioning CSG
processes and actions to the new JPSG construct.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY228

•Additization: DLA continued to implement a comprehensive policy for additizing commercial
jet fuel, including the establishment of expeditionary additization capability and enhancements to
the resilience of the additive supply chain. DLA collaborated with USINDOPACOM and Pacific
Air Forces to preposition individual additive components (Fuel System Icing Inhibitor, Corrosion
Inhibitor/Lubricity Improver, Static Dissipator Additive) at three DLA Distribution Centers in the
Pacific theater. Storing the additive individually prevents issues with shelf life of the product.
DLA has also established the capability to build additive kits at two of these three locations. The
fuel additive kitting can provide the warfighter with a Medium kit (additizes 60,000 gallons ofneat jet fuel) or a Large kit (additizes 250,000 gallons of neat jet fuel). If requested the warfighter
would be sent one complete kit or the required amount of individual items to support their fuelrequirement. This process simplifies the additive process for the warfighter, improves DLA’s
flexibility to support specific fuel requirements, mitigates shelf life concerns, and allows DLA to
support all customers in theater. Currently DLA is posturing individual fuel additive components
in EUCOM and CENTCOM distribution centers and working with the combatant commands toreview their requirements.

•

Energy Readiness R&D: The Energy Readiness R&D Program (ERP) is a designated Defense
Operational Energy Program that directly supports the DoD Class III Bulk fuel and energy supply
system through a multi-faceted approach to addressing issues connected to the entire spans of thesystem, in coordination with the military services. The program addresses issues connected withensuring operation fuel integrity, supply chain infrastructure maintenance, and alternative (nonpetroleum based) drop-in replacement fuel certifications. Current ongoing projects include:
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

o

Woody Biomass Conversion to Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels (Congressional Add
Project) - will result in viable fuel production alternative to petroleum using available
forestry material.
Development of New Ground Vehicle Fuel Contamination Limits Compatible withHigh Pressure Common Rail Engines – reevaluation of the ground vehicle fuelcontamination limits to ensure compatibility with Joint Light Tactical Vehicles (JLTV).
Test and Evaluation of Alternative Rocket Fuels (TEARF) - entails the selection,
analysis, and experimental evaluation of existing or readily available alternative rocket
kerosene formulations to broaden the supplier base.
Condition Based Maintenance and Calibration for Flow Meters – addresses
functional areas of meter calibration and maintenance inefficiencies in order to eliminate
unnecessary time and cost associated with the repetitious servicing of meters.
Method Optimization for Quantification of Polar Heteroatomic Species in Mobility
Fuel – will optimize previously developed analytical methods that detect and quantify
deleterious polar heteroatomic species in mobility fuels.
Investigation of Waste-Based Feedstocks for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production –investigates the behavior of urban solid waste under possible gasification environments todetermine suitability as feedstock for alternative (non-petroleum based) fuel conversion.
Using a Field Portable Liquid Chromatography (LC) Device for Detecting Additives
in Fuel - evaluating the capability of a field-portable liquid chromatography system toreplicate the capabilities of a laboratory benchtop instrument with respect to current LCbased methods for analysis of metal deactivator (MDA) and corrosion inhibitor/lubricity
improver (CI/LI) additives.
Trace Metals and Their Prevalence, Removal, and Impacts on Thermal Stability –will develop DOD analytical methods for trace metals harmful to fuel stability andevaluate the metal content of petroleum fuels with various available instruments andnovel techniques.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

9

o
o

•

Arctic Fuel System Supply Point - supports the DoD’s Arctic Strategy to enhance cold
climate capabilities necessary to provide the Army with the ability to operate in extreme
cold-weather environments.
High Performance Green Aerospace Propellant Composition Characterization investigates and further develops LMP-103S aerospace propellant quality checkprocesses and methodology in order to create an industry standard that can be used forincreased source procurement and sampling verification.

Battery Network: The Battery Network manufacturing technology R&D program,along with Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) investments, supported multiple
efforts to improve supply and performance, address obsolescence, and reduce costs forbatteries used in fielded weapons or soldier systems. DLA established the manufacturing
design and processes for significantly lighter, bi-polar lead-acid batteries and plans todeliver MIL-32143 and MIL-8565/11 battery sets, respectively, to the Army Ground
Vehicle Systems Center (GVSC) and Navy Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) for testingand qualification in 2023. Lighter batteries will lower fuel use in assigned systems anddistribution logistics. DLA also initiated design analyses of lithium-ion alternatives for
multiple nickel-cadmium batteries which can improve supply chain viability, lower
battery weight, increase power and energy, and significantly extend battery life (which
lowers replenishment requirements). DLA also continued work on a range of technicalenhancements to battery systems. These improvements include lower cost, high-quality
production of carbon monofluoride used in superior non-rechargeable batteries (BA5790), leveraging solid-state electrolytes to improve small system battery safety (BB2590), and leveraging battery deactivation and materials separation/reclamation processes
for more efficient, non-hazardous, disposition of batteries around the world.

Joint Staff
The Joint Staff J-4 globally integrates the Joint Logistics Enterprise (JLENT), assesses and strengthens
Joint Force Readiness, improves Joint Warfighting capability, enables Globally Integrated Operations,while providing best military advice to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
•

Global Bulk Fuel Responsibilities: Based on the changes in the FY22 National Defense
Authorization Act, the Joint Staff supported implementation of USTRANSCOM to become thesingle element responsible for global bulk fuel management and delivery (GBFMD). The Joint
Staff supported and participated in operational planning that developed the congressionallymandated GBFMD memorandum, which confirmed USTRANSCOM as the single manager for
global bulk fuel management and delivery.

•

Demand Reduction Capability Portfolio Management Review: Ongoing Logistics Functional
Capabilities Board initiative to identify the demand reduction ecosystem both internal andexternal to the DoD, identify attributes most important to the warfighter, and recommended joint
performance requirements.

•

In FY22, the Joint Capabilities Board reviewed and validated the Initial Capability Document for
Tactical and Combat Vehicle - Electrification (TACV-E), with the U.S. Army is the leadcomponent, who is requested to provide an annual update to the Logistics Functional Capabilities
Board regarding status of electrification initiatives under TACV-E.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2210

•Energy Key Performance Parameter (eKPP): The Joint Staff J-4 worked with the Services toreinvigorate evaluation of the eKPP in Capability Decision Documents (CDDs) and ensure arobust Energy Supportability Analysis was part of the submission when required by the JCIDS
Manual. They conducted “road show” briefings with the various Functional Capability Boards(FCBs) to discuss how the eKPP does not focus directly on energy-related costs or platform“efficiency” but rather on broader mission effectiveness within the context of the most stressful
mission and threat. The recent ESAs for the CH-53K Super Stallion and KC-Y tanker
demonstrated that when sponsors execute the ESA according to the JCIDS Manual, the eKPP
meets the intent of balancing energy logistics and security risks without degrading mission
effectiveness.

Army
The Army consumed 6 percent of the Department’s operational fuel in FY22, which compares to 8
percent in FY21. Total Army flight hours for FY22 have yet to be fully reported, but in FY21, 11,804
BBtus (32.8 percent) of Army OE consumption was for air operations and 24,194 BBtus (67.2 percent)was for ground operations. Overall, the Army consumed fuel to train, deploy, conduct contingency
operations worldwide, and sustain those operations.
•

In support of the National Defense Strategy and the Army’s ability to conduct logistics incontested, multi-domain environments, the Army is developing energy technologies that will
provide warfighters tactical advantage through an organized campaign of rapid experimentation,
prototyping and Soldier evaluations. By minimizing the demand for supplies and services,
including fuel, operational forces are capable of greater range and endurance, giving
Commander’s greater freedom of action and reducing risk to combat and sustainment forces.
These modernization and demand reduction efforts are reflected in the Army’s persistent drive
toward ground vehicle electrification.

•

The Army continued to test and develop anti-idle capabilities for tactical wheeled vehicles
throughout FY22 to retrofit the current fleet. These kits are expected to reduce the fuelconsumption of a vehicle by at least 20 percent and engine runtime by up to 50 percent,improving fuel efficiencies, extending operational endurance, and reducing maintenancerequirements. The Army is also developing technologies for hybrid-electric drive vehicles. In
FY22, the Army received two Bradley Hybrid-Electric Vehicle Prototypes that are undergoing
testing to assess the operational benefits of integrating hybrid electric drives into combat
platforms, and also awarded contracts for one JLTV and two HMMWV Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Prototypes for delivery in 2023. Hybrid-electric vehicles are expected to reduce fuelconsumption by up to 35 percent, provide extended silent watch and silent mobility capabilities,
and reduce thermal and audible signatures to increase survivability. The advanced electricalsystems will also provide more power to support emerging capabilities such as active protection
systems, directed energy weapons, or power import/export capabilities. The advancements being
made in hybrid-electric technologies are informing the development of future all-electric tacticaland combat vehicle platforms.

•

The Army Climate Strategy (ACS), published in February 2022, and Implementation Plan (ACSIP), October 2022, synchronize climate-related efforts across the force to increase capability,
prepare for new threats and operating environments, and modernize processes and standards
while cutting operational energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. The ACS Line of Effort(LOE) 2, Acquisition and Logistics, and LOE 3, Training, provide the framework for theoperational force to establish the programs, methods, techniques, and procedures to build

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

11

resiliency and adapt to, and mitigate impacts on, of a changing operational environment. The
Army includes Energy Key Performance Parameters in the development and acquisition of
warfighter systems, implements predictive and prognostic maintenance on systems on new andlegacy systems; includes energy considerations in professional education and training programs;
reviews doctrine for energy impacts; develops operational energy planning tools and processes;
and includes energy in wargaming exercises to increase and improve energy-awareness behaviors
in the force.
•

Additional Army RDT&E efforts in FY22 to advance Army OE capabilities include thedevelopment of tactical battlefield recharging technologies to support future hybrid-electric andall-electric vehicle fleets, and the exploration of alternative fuels. The Army is working with theother Services and the Defense Logistics Agency to qualify and certify jet fuel made fromsustainable alternative production pathways as drop-in replacements for use in Army equipment.
To date, the Army has qualified alternative fuels from two pathways for use in all Armyequipment, and certified Army aircraft to use alternative fuels from an additional two pathways.
Currently, the Army has completed testing fuels from four additional pathways which areawaiting final approval for use.

To support both the development of the future force and the readiness of the current force, the Army
invested significantly in science and technology, as well as upgrades to the legacy fleet. See Appendix F
for details on FY22 investments.
Department of the NavyThe Navy and Marine Corps continued to align strategy and investment to enable distributed operatingand expeditionary advanced basing concepts introduced in the 2018 National Defense Strategy. The
Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) released a fragmentary order (FRAGO 01/2019) to the Navy’s Designfor Maintaining Maritime Superiority (Design 2.0) to refocus efforts toward Great Power Competition
and increase our efficacy though an integrated - Navy and Marine Corps - force. CNO also released an“Operational Energy Component” to Design 2.0 that established objectives for aligning the Navy energy
network - suppliers and users - to support the integrated naval force in Distributed Maritime Operations(DMO) and Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO). The objectives prioritize resupply
capability and sources, weapons systems’ operational reach, and energy command and control to enable
the forward deployed integrated force to operate distributed in all domains in contested environments.
The Commandant of the Marine Corps continued to focus on the capability of the Marine Littoral
Regiment and capabilities that enhance their lethality while reducing the logistics required to support
them.
•

Summary of DON Fuel Use: Including both Navy and Marine Corps, the Department of Navy
consumed 38% of the Department’s operational energy use, which compares to 35 percent in FY
2021. Overall, the Department of Navy consumed energy across these broad mission areas (37percent, Navy aircraft, 33 percent surface ships, 17 percent Military Sealift Command ships, 12
percent Marine Corps aircraft, and 1 percent Marine Corps ground tactical platforms). In FY22,
the Department of the Navy’s operational energy program focused on power and fuel in supportof platforms, advanced sensors, and directed energy weapon systems, fuel distribution incontested environments, as well as developing systems that provide commanders information
about their energy use in order to achieve a more lethal force with increased operational reach andtime-on-station. Based on the current fleet building plan, the Department of the Navy expects
fuel consumption to continue to rise

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

12

•

Alternative Fuel Qualification: The Navy is investing in mobility tactical fuels and alternative
fuels to achieve increased mission capability, reduced TOC and increased worldwide fuelavailability and operability. During FY2022, The Navy completed tri-service assessments ofthree synthetic fuels to maintain interoperability with commercial aviation and also completed
testing and assessment of one synthetic ship fuel. In addition, DON developed technical data andrecommendations to allow NAVSEA to issue guidance on use of F-75 as an alternative fuel inareas where F-76 has limited availability•

Improvements to Current Equipment: The Navy is prioritizing reduction of fuel consumption
in existing and future systems through improvements of current equipment, to include installationof energy conservation measures such as LED lighting and Auxiliary Prestage Area Refrigeration(APAR) System. The Integrated Power and Energy Systems Program will support thedevelopment of Next Generation Integrated Power and Energy System technology aboard Navy
ships to enable current and future weapons systems and to enable the sharing of power between
propulsion and systems loads resulting in significant efficiencies in fuel consumption.

•

New Capabilities: The Navy continued to invest in refueling infrastructure and research anddevelopment for energy storage to increase the endurance of unmanned systems. In addition, theNavy continues investment in energy command and control and planning tools, including the
Global Energy Information System (GENISYS) for the Navy’s combatant and expeditionary
forces and Replenishment at Sea Planner (RASP) for logistics and fuel distribution planning.
The Navy Logistics Enterprise is integrating all Navy LOG IT systems, including GENISYS andRASP, to establish capabilities for optimizing energy and logistics supply and demand for
distributed operations in contested environments. In FY22, GENISYS was installed on three
DDG-51 class ships with plans to increase number of installs of DDG, LHD/LHA and LPD classships across the FYDP. In addition, non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM) prototype technology
was installed on a DDG-51 class ship to evaluate feasibility of obtaining detailed shipboard
electric load data to inform Electric Plant Load Analysis, a critical design process for right sizingof new ship power plants. NAVSEA is also exploring additional energy performance
improvements of DDG51 propulsion as well as other classes of ships. Focusing on improving therange and endurance, the Navy is developing the first CVN-based organic mission and recovery
tanker. The MQ-25 Program will extend the range and increase lethality of the Carrier Aircraft
Wing, and will contribute to F/A-18EF shortfall by relieving tanker duties and returning a/c to thestrike fighter role. MQ-25 will also have a secondary ISR capability.

The Marine Corps continued to invest in advanced power and mobility capabilities that use less fuel thanprevious technologies. Mobile electric hybrid power systems, small unit power, and energy storage units
give expeditionary units access to renewables and microgrids in order to reduce fuel demand. Anothermajor focus is the use of standard lithium batteries to offset disposable battery use and improve themobility and lethality of dismounted warfighters. During FY22, the Marine Corps also made the decision
to start investing in hybrid tactical vehicles and combat systems with the prototype Advanced
Reconnaissance Vehicle.

•

Energy in Requirements and Acquisition: In FY22, the Navy and Marine Corps conducted an
initial review of 27 acquisition programs to assess alignment of the role of energy acrossrequirements and acquisition processes to support of energy key performance parameters (eKPPs)
development, reduction of energy demand and enhanced energy supportability. In addition, theNavy coordinated the incorporation of operational energy (supply and demand) and OPLANs into
campaign modeling (STORM and Replenishment At-Sea Planner), to provide acquisition

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

13

programs the tools to perform supportability analyses in support of changes in requirements andacquisition governance processes.
Department of the Air Force
The Air Force consumed 54 percent of the Department’s operational energy in FY22 and remains
consistent with previous years’ consumption numbers. Overall, the Air Force consumed energy acrossthese broad mission areas: 53 percent mobility, 33 percent fighter/attack, 6 percent bomber, and 4 percent
training. Through the rapid deployment of 21st century technology and a data-driven approach to
optimizing energy use in operations, the Air Force continues to enhance combat capability and readiness.
••

Data Collection and Analysis:oComprehensive, trustworthy data is essential to analyze flight operations. The Operational
Energy Data Collection Strategy facilitated greater visibility into Air Force fuel use anduncovered numerous opportunities to enhance operations through the efficient applicationof resources. As of December 2022, the Air Force Operational Energy Office (SAF/IEN)
has access to approximately 62 percent of sortie-level aircraft fuel use data across all
airframes, and the Air Force continues to grow our analysis capabilities to inform decision
making.

o

Utilizing modern tools and software, the Department of the Air Force established a pipeline
to store and analyze flight and fuel use data from multiple sources, enabling collaboration
with other stakeholders. The shared environment allows the Air Force to better analyze
operations, optimize aircraft fuel and load planning, and identify best practices to maximize
aircraft reach and readiness. This pipeline now processes manually collected data from
Mobility Air Force (MAF) aircraft and supports a prototype of high-resolution flight data
recorder analysis capability for KC-135s.

oThese data sets and tools help the DAF to assess the effects of energy optimization on
combat capability in warfighting scenarios. In 2020, the DAF used an establishedwargaming model to show that legacy air refueling platforms with a 10% efficiency
increase are 20% more effective on the battlefield, delivering more fuel to receivers withfewer sorties. Since then, the DAF has expanded access to operational simulations thatwill allow us to evaluate fuel efficiency improvements in the context of their impact on thebattlefield, with a clear link to warfighter value. These simulations allow the DAF to
explore the value of investments as they relate to combat capability directly and can informresourcing and program management decisions across the enterprise.

o

In 2022, the Department of the Air Force partnered with the Defense Innovation Unit to
expand the data pipeline and increase the transmittal, processing, and visualization of highfidelity flight recorder data files to enable insights into enterprise fuel use. The prototype
uses advanced analytics to ingest historical and near-real time data from mobility aircraftat scale. By matching mission details to aircraft performance, the platform will discoverinferences that will shape enterprise-level decisions for future fuel usage.

Global Mobility Allocation Software:oKessel Run, a Division under the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s Digital
Directorate, began developing Magellan in 2020 in collaboration with Air Mobility

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

14

Command. Magellan is a software application used to allocate mobility aircraft globally.
Magellan gives operational planners more visibility over long-term scheduling and enables
planners to de-conflict airlift and aerial refueling requests during high-demand periods. It
also increases planning flexibility, allowing planners to more quickly and easily adjust
when priorities change. In 2020, the team fielded a minimum viable product, and Magellan
reached initial operating capability. Magellan is now the sole source of data for allocation
decisions at AMC/A3.

•o

In 2021, the Office of the Secretary of Defense directed Operational Energy funding for
MAF aircraft allocation and long-range planning through FY 2026, starting with $6 million
in FY22, including funding to improve Magellan’s functionality, allowing the Air Force tosupport more mobility and aerial refueling missions and provide operational decision
advantage. Air Force Operational Energy is working with the 581st Software Engineering
Squadron to push updates and features to Magellan and integrate it with current programsof record.

o

In 2022, the DAF partnered with Program Executive Office Business Enterprise Systems(PEO-BES) to help sustain and reduce vulnerabilities of the Aviation Resource
Management System (ARMS). Operational Energy investments helped the ARMS
Program Management Office (PMO) accelerate development and modernization of
ARMS, which is the program of record for aircrew currency requirements. ARMS
interfaces with Mobility Air Forces Command and Control (MAF C2) tools like Puckboard
to optimize aircrew training and readiness, and has the potential to improve decision
advantage for operational planners by providing combat ready aircrew status to meetrequirements.

oAdditionally, the DAF partnered with the 618th AOC on Next Gen Information Technology
for Mobility Readiness Enhancement (NITMRE) to re-focus efforts on the Unified Data
Library to employ asynchronous communications across the MAF C2 architecture. Thiseffort will be followed immediately with the application of human-machine teaming andnatural language processing to existing platforms within the DAF Data Fabric / Cloud One
environment.

o

SAF/IEN partnered with the Air Mobility Command Commander’s Initiative Group andthe 581st Software Engineering Squadron to support development activities for theCommand & Control Decision Delivery (C2D2) web application tool to share commandand control decisions from any echelon to the MAF Enterprise via the Unified Data
Library. The goal of C2D2 is to enable the effective use of resources, inform command
decisions, and increase awareness in a denied, disrupted, intermittent, and limited
environment.

Mobility Training Planning Software:oFrom the Innovation Cell “Tron” under the Aloha Spark and Palmetto Spark teams, Air
Force Operational Energy supported the launch of Puckboard, a real-time collaborative
scheduling engine which saw tremendous growth. Distributing schedule updates to aircrew
can now be done in real-time on the Puckboard platform, available anywhere on the globe,
on or off the DOD network. Puckboard gives time back to Airmen and enables them tohelp revolutionize squadron scheduling through an open architecture, which permits
seamless interoperability with other modern information systems and supports
supplemental services to streamline planning.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

15

•

o

Puckboard also made significant strides towards its permanent Program Executive Office(PEO) home with two Major Command validated requirements, plus users from AMC, Air
Combat Command (ACC), Pacific Air Forces (PACAF), U.S. Air Forces Europe(USAFE), Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC), U.S. Space Force (USSF),
and the US Marine Corps (USMC). Also, in 2022, the PEO formally began its program
health assessment, another requirement to permanent PEO status. In 2021, our officesecured funding for Puckboard through FY 2026, which included $6 million for FY22.
This Operational Energy funding effort enabled the program to secure over $13M inmatching Small Business Innovation Research Strategic Financing from AFWERX in
2022.

o

In 2022, Tron released two features on the Puckboard roadmap: Puckboard Logging and
Big Board. Puckboard Logging captures data at the edge and securely delivers them to
Mobility Air Forces Command and Control systems of record, eliminating 6-8 hours perpost mission paperwork package of Airmen’s time spent manually verifying andtranscribing data. The Big Board feature allows aircrew members and squadron leadershipto review the “big picture” more accurately and efficiently, thus decreasing needs formanual processes such as additional whiteboards and excel spreadsheets that are still inplace. Tron is collaborating with MIT Lincoln Labs AI Accelerator to incorporate artificial
intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) to accelerate squadron scheduling andmaximize training opportunities to produce combat-ready aircrew. In January 2023, MIT
Lincoln Labs received a Certificate to Field the Puckboard AI Solver. In March 2023, Tron
AF is scheduled to kickoff development of training and standardization-evaluation
functions to provide additional improvements in squadron readiness.

Cargo Optimization:o

The DAF continues to partner with AMC/A4 on the Aerial Port of the Future. In 2022, theDAF invested a total of $6.7 million in foundational automated air cargo management
tools, including $3.5 million in RDT&E funding for Merlin, a program to automate portto-port and diplomatic clearance requests with digital documentation. The DAF also
funded $2.1 million for Cerebus, a tool that optimizes air cargo freight movements andprovides real-time cargo status and location notifications. Finally, the DAF provided $1.1
million in funding for Apollo, a program that provides nodal throughput with next
generation asset reporting and workload data, offering near-real-time display of facilities,
equipment, and personnel.

o

The DAF also continued to partner with DIU and NAVAIR on Air Logistics Optimization,
which leverages proven operations research methodologies to optimize airlift cargo andaircraft scheduling through efficient cargo routing, ultimately reducing empty and partiallyempty legs. It also provides a more comprehensive operational picture for disruption
management and dynamic scheduling. Additionally, the solution will include a simulationand modeling capability for logistics flow Course of Action (COA) development andwargaming.

o

The DAF partnered with the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) to researchstereoscopic vision for 3-D cargo scanning to inform cargo planning and enroute visibility.
The DAF partnered with AFRL on cargo research efforts to leverage commercial
technology to digitally model and develop optimization prototypes for aerial port
throughput and intra-theater airlift. Finally, the DAF partnered with the 581st Software

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

16

Engineering Squadron to develop Levels, a C-17 weight-and-balance application designed
to accelerate load planning, optimize center-of-gravity on airlift missions, and connect toMobility Air Forces Command and Control systems of record to enable in-transit visibility
and decision advantage.
••

Aviation Alternative Fuels:oResearch and analysis of conventional and alternative fuel certification processes, fueladditives, and fuel transfer and storage equipment help to identify and address problem
areas resulting in improved resilience of the jet fuel supply chain while conducting logistics
while under attack.

o

The Logistics and Sustainment division maintained its ongoing engagement withcommercial stakeholders such as the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative(CAAFI), International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), our OEM manufacturers andother government agencies, to maintain awareness of the research, development, testing,certification, and commercialization of “drop-in” alternative aviation fuel in the ASTM
International approval process. Air Force Operational Energy continued to team with DOD
and DAF stakeholders, such as the Defense Logistics Agency Energy, Air Force Petroleum
Office, Air Force Research Laboratory, and Air Staff, as well as international allies andpartners, to monitor alternative fuel production, pricing, and commercial use to better
position the DAF to support changes in the defense alternative fuels strategy and provide
operational flexibility based on fuel availability in specific regions/circumstances.

o

In 2022, Air Force Operational Energy endorsed the CSAF Blue Horizons Project FIERCE(Forward Integrated Energy Resourcing for Contested Environments) to create and test afully synthetic “drop-in” replacement jet fuel from captured carbon dioxide and water.
This synthetic fuel is net carbon neutral. It requires as much captured carbon input asemitted when the fuel is burned, but rather than contributing additional emissions, it’srecycling. Blue Horizon completed flight testing of the fuel in July 2022 at Hsu STEM
range in Laurel Hill, Florida. With the success of this initial project the project will expand
into a Synthetic Fuels for Contested Environments Area of Interest with the Defense
Innovation Unit. In 2023, the AF A5/7 Futures and AFRL/RQ team will look to expand
on the work generated from Project FIERCE into real world Air Force exercises like
Exercise MOBILITY GUARDIAN to better understand the capability development
requirement to support conducting logistics under attack.

Legacy Aircraft Sustainment:o

The DAF liaised with multiple defense industry and commercial aviation entities to
identify industry best practices and technologies in aircraft sustainment that could
potentially translate to the Air Force. By leveraging infrared imaging and laser scanning
methods of engine compressor blades for the inspection and rework of engine components,
paired with innovative material for coatings of engine compressor blades, the DAF islooking to ensure overhauled legacy engines deliver optimized engine performance. The
commercial aviation industry is realizing fuel savings of 2-4 percent for the combined
execution of these processes.

o

In 2022, the DAF initiated a project to certify compressor blade coating for use on the F117
(C-17 aircraft) engines to confirm the technology’s ability to improve blade durability andengine performance. This project leverages our cooperative research and development

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

17

agreement with Delta Airlines and focuses on coating high-pressure compressor bladeswith an erosion/corrosion resistant finish to preserve structure, reduce fuel consumption,
increase time on wing, and result in higher overall engine performance. In 2023, the Air
Force will initiate a second certification program for coated blades to be incorporated into
the F108 (KC-135 aircraft). The addition of this new material is expected to reduce fueldemand by $25 million per year if fully implemented across the C-17 and KC-135 fleets.
o

Air Force Operational Energy is also supporting and funding testing of compressor blade
scanning for the F108 engine at Tinker Air Force Base. The project continues to utilize
funds from 2018 and the blade analysis concluded in 2022. In 2023, the DAF will takelessons learned from the testing program and coordinate with the Air Force Life Cycle
Management Center Propulsion Directorate to determine next steps for incorporation into
depot repair processes.

oAdditionally, the DAF expanded sponsorship of an AFWERX Small Business Innovation
Research (SBIR) program to test nucleated engine foam washing and assess this methods
ability to increase CV-22 aircraft performance and improve sustainment methods. Specificimprovements from the CV-22 initiative contributed to an increase in average time on wingfrom 149 hours to 251 hours, doubled on-station aircraft availability, increased mission
capability rate from 36 percent to 64 percent, eliminated 550+ man-hours and reduced thenumber of annual engine changes by 5, saving $4M across the nucleated foam wash
program. The results and associated performance improvements led to the expansion of
the wash to the AFSOC AC-130 platforms. Fuel flow data on the AFSOC AC-130's
involved in the program are showing a 0.7 percent improvement in aircraft efficiency, andif applied to the Air Force fleet, this would result in a $7 million per year cost avoidance.

o

To collect data on the full-scale effect of consistently washing with detergent across a fleet,the Air Force pursued a change to the engine wash contract covering the KC-135, C-5, B52 and E-3 aircraft. The engine wash contract implementation occurred in 2022 and the
DAF is analyzing the data to assess overall maintenance improvements from this first-year
project. Follow-on tests between foam and detergent washing will also be executed tocompare all methods and conduct a business case analysis for the different wash methodson large high-bypass engines. SAF/IEN secured $3 million in funding for this projectthrough FY 2026, with $600K in FY 2023.

oFinally, the DAF worked with the Future Force Energy and Power Office to research anddesign new engine fan duct panels on the KC-135. The legacy fan ducts have incurred
water damage that has delaminated the honeycomb duct material. Previous repairs
involved pulling panels from retired aircraft, but that supply has been depleted. Current
repair processes necessitate a field-level epoxy-patch installation, which is more of a quickfix, and not a permanent solution. This repair results in turbulent airflow through theengine and reduces performance. The redesigned honeycomb patches will improve engine
performance by increasing airflow, resulting in a cost avoidance of $1 million per year thatis anticipated to grow to greater than $5.5 million per year across the fleet. This research
effort provides all the necessary molds to create the new fan ducts, along with providing
an airworthiness certification, and provides validated installation processes needed forfield-level installations. This is in addition to the routine maintenance savings currently
costing the AF 1.7K maintenance hours per year for $1.85 million, which is expected to
grow to $9 million a year. The Materials and Manufacturing Directorate (AFRL/RX)
provided the $1.3 million in funding to research this issue. The team expects to install andconduct flight evaluations on one aircraft at Rickenbacker Air National Guard Base starting

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

18

in March 2023. The Air Force expects nearly every KC-135 aircraft in the fleet will require
this repair, so the timing is noteworthy and vitally important.
••

Mission Execution Excellence Program (MEEP)o

As part of DAF efforts to streamline operations and increase aircraft range and capability,
Air Force Operational Energy, in partnership with Air Mobility Command Headquarters,
launched a pilot program to incentivize optimized flying on the largest fuel consumers in
the Air Force, heavy mobility aircraft. MEEP encourages Airmen to increase use of
efficient flying ‘best practices’ through direct and indirect incentives - and importantly,
does not negatively impact mission and training requirements.

o

The overarching goal of MEEP is to establish a culture of fuel consciousness with thelargest point of emphasis on precise fuel planning. Through precision fuel planning,
operators can increase fuel efficiency by ensuring the optimal fuel load is carried on theaircraft. For example, the DAF analysis of C-17, KC-135, and B-52 data models correlates
precision fuel planning with reduced maintenance costs and improvements in readinessmetrics such as aircraft availability. The DAF is seeking additional data sources to refine
the analysis of other aircraft types and working with MAJCOMs to optimize the amountof fuel carried on heavy aircraft. Air Mobility Command (AMC) intends to include thisperformance indicator as part of their OE reporting.

oThe pilot phase of MEEP (May-Sep 2022) included four active-duty C-17 squadrons at
Travis AFB, CA and JB Charleston, SC. MEEP liaisons engage with pilots and operations
planners, as well as maintainers and logisticians, to leverage Airman innovation andintegrate improved techniques and best practices into their day-to-day operations. Throughthese efforts, these units made several updates to planning and operations process
improvements resulting in a reduction in their average shutdown fuel per sortie by over
10,000 pounds. Collectively, they are on track to save over 1.2 million gallons of aviationfuel this year. As a result of these accomplishments, Air Force Operational Energy
provided over $1.8 million in rebate and award incentives to the Wings participating in
MEEP.

o

Initial estimates show that employing MEEP can improve energy intensity – or the mission
effectiveness per gallon of fuel – by 3 percent. This is expected to increase capability andreadiness while generating as much as $80 million per year in fuel cost savings that can be
returned to the Air Force and participating units.

oThe pilot phase focused on active-duty C-17 Globemaster III units, the largest Air Forcefuel consumers across the AF enterprise. In CY23 and beyond, MEEP will expand toinclude more strategic-airlift units including those in AFRC/ANG, additional aircraft types,
and eventually additional MAJCOMs outside of the MAF.

Capability Development and Acquisitions:o

The Future Operations division of Air Force Operational Energy guides acquisition policy
and influences plans and programs to address operational energy requirements associatedwith new and major modification programs through the Energy Key Performance
Parameter and Energy Supportability Analysis. Through research, development,
prototyping, and demonstration efforts, the Air Force works closely with AFRL to push

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

19

the technology envelope and help advance key disruptive technologies to maximize
operational energy efficacy and outpace our competitors.

•o

The DAF has invested in and advocated for several technologies and platforms that
increase range or endurance and optimize fuel use for numerous critical missions. TheDAF also plays an active role in the Capability Development process, participating in
Capability Development Working Groups. Through these engagements, the DAF helps
ensure future systems will not only be optimized for energy considerations but will besustainable in their intended operational environments.

o

The DAF works closely with the office of Future Force Energy & Power (F2EP), the Air
Vehicles and Turbine Engines Divisions and the Center for Rapid Innovation at AFRL, as
well as Air Force Futures Disruptive Technologies Division and the Defense Innovation
Unit to transition new technology to the Air Force and Combatant Commands.

Drag Reduction:o

AFRL Future Force Energy and Power efforts that were new or continuing in 2022 span awide range of capability improvements. The DAF continues to support and advocate for
C-17 Microvanes™, which are aft body drag reduction devices that will save the Air Force$10 million per year in fuel costs, with a return on investment of less than six months. In
2022, our office secured $6 million in funding to implement Microvanes™ on the full C17 fleet of 222 aircraft.

oKC-135 vertical wipers will increase efficiency by 1 percent, saving an estimated $7
million per year in fuel. In 2022, the DAF secured $10 million in funding to complete
development and install vertical wipers on KC-135. The future inventory of KC-135s iscurrently uncertain, but the Air Force anticipates between 300 and 395 aircraft will receive
the modification.

o

The DAF conducted initial investigations in coordination with industry and AFRL partners
for KC-135 aft body drag reduction devices, which are expected to save more than $7
million per year. The DAF secured $15.5 million in funding to implement thesetechnologies on 300-395 KC-135s through FY 2023. Similarly, the DAF secured $20.5
million in funding to complete development and install C-130 aft body drag reduction
devices through 2023.

o

For the C-17 engine pylon fairings, the DAF secured $4 million in funding from FY22 to
FY 2023 to complete prior development efforts and implement on the full fleet. The
estimated annual savings is $3 million.

oAdditionally, for FY22 the DAF secured $2M in funding to optimize mobility aircraft flightcontrol surface rigging using industry partner proprietary data analytics, with planned
implementation in FY 2023.

o

The FY22 National Defense Authorization Act allocated $2M for RDT&E activity
associated with C-17 Active Winglets and $2M for the continuation of KC-135 Active
Winglets. Air Force Operational Energy will begin working with AFRL HQ to determine
focus of this research and ensure the C-17 Program Office and Air Mobility Command aresynchronized to support the upcoming research effort.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2220

•

Blended Wing Body Aircraft:o••

The DAF is exploring the benefits of a Blended Wing Body aircraft, which is expected toincrease fuel efficiency of large aircraft by 30 percent (with today’s engines). For a tanker,
this can equate to nearly a doubling of radius at a given offload, or a doubling of offload at
a given radius. This prototype project aims to accelerate future optionality for tanker,
cargo, and bomber fleets while leveraging significant private capital to maximize DoD
return on investment. The project aims to complete the first flight of a full-scale BWB
aircraft by December 2026, and completion of initial flight testing by September 2027.

Advanced Propulsion, Power, and Aerodynamics:o

The DAF continues to support the development and implementation of adaptive engine
technologies, for F-35A, and future platforms such as Next-Generation Air Dominance (6thgeneration fighter).

o

The DAF continues to support future acquisition of three-stream adaptive engine
technology for 5th and 6th generation fighter aircraft, as part of the Advanced Engine
Transition Program (AETP) and Next-Generation Adaptive Propulsion (NGAP) program.
By relying on a third stream of air that can be dynamically modulated between the engine’s
core and the bypass stream, an adaptive engine can provide increased thrust during combat
conditions and increased fuel efficiency during cruise conditions. Fielding such engines
would provide increased range or loiter time, reduce tanker demand, and additional cooling
air for thermal management.

oAnother program is advancing the state of the art for the recuperated turbojet engine,
powering a nearly silent, long-range, hybrid powertrain UAS. The Space Solar Powereffort is developing technology to harvest solar energy in space, then wirelessly transmit
this energy to a location in the atmosphere or on the ground for electrical power, reducing
Air Force reliance on petroleum-based fuels and vulnerable supply lines.

o

In 2022 the DAF continued to explore the energy-demand impact of next-generation
munitions, palletized munitions, and low-cost attritable aircraft capabilities. Increasing therange, quantity, and effectiveness of munitions per combat aircraft is expected tosignificantly decrease fighter and bomber aircraft fuel demand, which then would
significantly reduce aerial tanker fuel demand, one of the largest sources of wartime fuelconsumption in future Pacific scenarios.

Operational Energy Savings Account: In 2022, DAF fully implemented title 10 U.S.C. § 2912
for the first time. The statute enables the DoD to recover energy cost savings and invest in
additional operational energy efficiencies. The DAF has recovered $24 million in validated
operational energy cost savings to date. In 2022, Air Force Operational Energy obligated $1.9
million to provide dedicated operational energy subject matter expertise, $12.9 million to provide
virtual reality training modules to Air Mobility Command and Air Force Special Operations
Command (AFSOC), and $500,000 to provide electric aircraft support equipment to AFSOC.
Virtual Reality training increases readiness, training throughput and aircraft availability while
reducing fuel consumption. The common aircraft positioner provides an Agile Combat
Employment capability with a 90 percent weight reduction and elimination of diesel fuelrequirement for aircraft positioning.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2221

•

DAF Climate Action Plan: In 2022, Air Force Operational Energy finalized climate objectives
and key results as part of the Department of the Air Force Climate Action Plan (CAP), as directedby EO 14008, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, EO 14057 Clean Energy Industries
and Jobs through Federal Sustainability, and the Department of Defense Directive (DoDD)
4715.21 Climate Change, Adaptation, and Resilience. The DAF CAP is a living document thatwill be modified periodically to address new policies and guidance, technology innovation, andevolving missions. The DAF Senior Leader Climate Forum, comprised of members from the
Offices of the Secretariat, Deputy Chiefs of Staff, Deputy Chiefs of Space Operations, and chairedby the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Energy, Installations, and Environment, will provide
oversight, monitoring, and implementation direction through quarterly status briefings, while DAF
Climate Action Team members will develop more specific Plan of Action and Milestones, convenemonthly, and execute goal activities. Air Force Operational Energy’s climate mitigation and fuelefficiency efforts within the DAF CAP are detailed below:oObjective 3.1: Improve Operational Energy Intensity: Optimized aircraft energy use
increases the readiness and operational capability of the department, decreases risk tologistics supply chains, and informs operational plans while reducing greenhouse gas
emissions. Optimization includes the adoption of ultra-fuel-efficient aircraft designs,
which provide an opportunity to significantly improve combat capability.


KR 3.1.1: Operational energy intensity of Air Force flying missions increased 5
percent by FY27 and 7.5 percent by FY32 through standardized use of aircraft dragreduction technologies, modern software scheduling tools, and enhanced engine
sustainment practices.



KR 3.1.2: Development and testing of a full-scale blended wing body prototype
completed by FY27.

Conclusion
In summary, the Department is adopting operational concepts, training, command and control, andimproved and new weapons systems and technologies to reduce energy demand, mitigate risk, andenhance operations in contested environments. To ensure that Joint Forces have access to the energy
needed to fight and win while operating within contested environments, the Department will reduce
operational energy demand, diversify our energy sources, improve supply chain resilience, and enhancethe enterprise-wide visibility of energy supply and demand. The Department investments and initiatives
reviewed in this report will increase the resilience of the force against emerging threats and enable thesuccessful implementation of the National Defense Strategy.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2222

4. Installation Energy
Energy Resilience Policies and Guidance
In managing an energy resilient enterprise, the DoD must be prepared for and be able to recover fromutility disruptions that impact mission assurance on its installations. DoD relies on commercial power to
conduct missions from its installations, and these commercial power supplies can be threatened byphysical attacks, cyberattacks, climate change, and other environmental factors. Climate change is
expected to increase risks of wildfires, winter storms, hurricanes, storm surges, rain and heat hazards, andother extreme weather events, which are threat multipliers anddegrade installations and infrastructure. The DoD recognizes such
As defined by Title 10 U.S.C.
events could result in power outages affecting critical DoD missions
101(e)(6), energy resilience isand continues to work to understand and address the vulnerabilities
and risk of power disruptions that can impact mission readiness.
the ability to avoid,
prepare for, minimize, adapt
to, and recover fromanticipated and unanticipatedenergy disruptions in order toensure energy disruptions inorder to ensure energy
availability and reliability
sufficient to provide formission assurance andreadiness, including mission
essential operations related toreadiness, and to execute or
rapidly reestablish mission
essential requirements.”

Energy resilience can be enhanced in a variety of ways, including
the use of technologies, policies, readiness exercises, and energy
resilience management best-practices. Mission capability concerns
override preferences for specific technology implementation goals.
An important aspect of energy resilience is to establish an iterativeplanning and implementation cycle in which mission owners
conduct risk analyses and specify requirements, infrastructure
stakeholders solve for the specified requirements, and the processrepeats itself as needed to meet changing mission parameters.

DoD’s primary policy for energy strategy and guidance is DoD
Instruction (DoDI) 4170.11 (updated in 2016) which provides aframework for reducing energy consumption and investing inenergy reduction measures, with the goal of providing resilient
energy to support the warfighter. Updates to DoDI 4170.11 began in FY22 and are expected to becomplete in FY23, incorporating energy resilience strategies and climate resilience goals for the DoD.
DoD publishes policies, guidance, and the status of its energy resilience program on this website:
https://www.acq.osd.mil/eie/ie/fep_energy_resilience.html.

Installation Energy Plans (IEPs): Title 10 U.S.C. § 2911
Title 10 U.S.C. § 2911(b)(1) and (2) requires the DoD and Components to develop comprehensive masterplans for the achievement of DoD energy goals. To support this requirement, the DoD continues toensure the use of structured, rigorous evaluations of critical energy requirements, risks, and mitigations bycompleting installation energy plans (IEPs) for all installations. IEPs drive a more integrated andsystematic approach to energy and water management through informed energy and water resilienceplanning and support a more holistic energy project implementation with input from all stakeholders.
DoD policy requires that IEPs be completed for all DoD installations by the end of FY21. Installations
are responsible for conducting gap analysis and developing appropriate options for risk mitigation, whiledeveloping energy projects that optimize energy efficiency, reliability, and resiliency. In FY22, the DoD
continued completion of IEPs across the enterprise, focusing installation resiliency requirements on the

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

23

most advantageous technology and funding execution paths. Overall, the DoD has completed IEPs at 67
percent of installations and 87 percent of priority installations.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

24

Black Start Exercises (BSEs)
BSEs are real-world installation energy exercises in which the delivery of energy provided from off an
installation is turned off before backup generation assets on the installation are turned on. These
exercises determine the ability of the backup systems to start independently, transfer the load, and carrythe load until grid energy from off the installation is restored. BSEs link installation organizations withcritical missions to ensure the ability to meet critical mission requirements, validate mission operationplans, identify infrastructure interdependencies, and verify backup electric power system performance.
Similar to BSEs, Energy Resilience Table-Top Exercises (TTXs) are simulated, war-room exercises thatassess an installation’s ability to respond to different power disruption scenarios and are utilized when a
BSE is unfeasible.
While each exercise has been different, general findings and resilience gaps identified from prior BSEs
include:• Backup generators alone can be insufficient to provide energy resilience with challenges that
include being severely under-loaded, electrical misconfiguration, and improper prioritization ofcritical loads;• Lack of resilient IT architecture for cyber-security; and• Unknown energy and control system interdependencies that lead to unanticipated failures.
In FY22 the DoD completed 13 full BSEs across the Services, 2 partial BSEs (Army), and 10 TTXs
(Navy and DAF) to determine energy vulnerabilities and improve energy resilience.
Table 2. BSEs for Determining Energy Vulnerabilities

Critical Energy Capacity and Availability: Title 10 U.S.C. § 2920
Critical missions, as defined in title 10 U.S.C. § 2920, refers to those missions of an installation, including
mission-essential operations, that are critical to successful performance of the strategic national defense
mission. Energy systems used to support critical missions are developed and managed at the installationlevel by each of the Components and expected to meet the requirements outlined in title 10 U.S.C. §2920. Figure 5 below provides details on critical energy system capacity and progress toward achieving aminimum level of 99.9 percent energy system reliability for critical missions by 2030. The averagesystem reliability, defined as the percentage of time the energy system is functional, is approximately 99.8
percent for the entire DoD.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

25

Figure 5: Critical Energy Requirements and Emergency Backup System Capacities and Average Age by DoD
Component

Figure 6 below provides details on average system downtimes and average availability over the course of
the year of these critical energy systems for the DoD Components.

Figure 6: Average downtimes for critical energy system and average energy system availability by DoD
Component

Utility Outages on Privatized Systems: Title 10 U.S.C. § 2688(g)(4)To meet statutory requirements, DoD began collecting outage data to measure progress on privatizedsystems in FY19. Table 3 below provides details of FY22 outage data on privatized systems to help meetthis requirement. The average cost of outages has increased over the past two years due to extreme
Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

26

weather events that affected energy systems, including Winter Storm Uri in FY21, heat waves across the
U.S. in summer of FY22, and increases in energy supply costs due to the war in Ukraine.
Table 3. Privatized System Outage Summary

The Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program (ERCIP)
ERCIP, which is authorized by title 10 U.S.C. § 2914, is a critical element of the DoD’s strategy to
improve the energy resilience, energy security, and energy conservation of its fixed installations. ERCIP
is the principal mechanism applied to execute DoD high-priority, high-value projects that improve energy
resilience and mission readiness. The FY21 NDAA implemented significant 10 U.S.C. § 2914
modifications, transitioning ERCIP to a project/line-item authorized Military Construction program.
ERCIP improves readiness by focusing on the closure of critical energy gaps at priority locations,increasingly through application of cyber-security improvements, installation of field-flexible andexpandable microgrids, deployment of energy storage technologies, and the leveraging of existing
renewable energy generation resources. As ERCIP projects employ increasingly complex technologies,
the cost to design and construct ERCIP projects also increases. In FY22, Congress added $182.6M to
ERCIP, increasing the FY22 appropriations to $469.32M. Actual FY23 and requested FY24
appropriations are $653.25M and $634.25M, respectively.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

27

Table 4. Energy Resilience Project Snapshots

Installation Energy Alternative Funding
The DoD seeks to maximize the use of authorities to pursue third-party financing of installation
efficiency, renewable, other CFE energy generation, and resilience projects. These authorities are Utility
Energy Service Contracts (UESCs) and Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) (title 10 U.S.C.
§ 2913), power-purchase agreements (PPAs) (title 10 U.S.C. § 2922a), and outgrants (title 10 U.S.C. §2667 and 10 U.S.C. § 2668)(7) (see Appendix I).

Figure 7: Total investment value of ESPCs and UESCs by year (FY18 – FY22) for DoD

The DoD has the largest performance contracting portfolio in the Federal Government (over $5B). As
enabled by the Energy Act of 2020, EISA 2007, and EPACT 2005, DoD continues to use performance
contracts to bolster resilience and reduce energy intensity. The average size of DoD contracts iscomparatively large in comparison to other Federal agencies ($32M average per project for FY18 – FY22,
Figure 7 above). From FY18 – FY22 the Department awarded just under $3 billion through 91
performance contracts. In FY22, the DoD awarded seven ESPCs with a total investment value of$203.5M, and nine UESCs with a total investment value of $213.8M across all the Components.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

28

Table 5. Alternative Financing Project Snapshots

Installation Renewable Energy Goals
The DoD currently works to achieve two annual Federally mandated renewable energy goals: Section 203of the EPAct 2005 (title 42 U.S.C. § 15852(a)) and title 10 U.S.C. § 2911(g). The goal outlined in title 10
U.S.C. § 2911(g) is specific to DoD, and progress cannot include the purchase of unbundled renewableenergy credits (RECs). DoD progress toward both FY22 installation renewable energy goals is shown in
Table 6 below.
Table 6. FY22 Progress Toward Installation Energy Goals
GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Consume More Electric
Energy from Renewable
Sources

METRICCOMPONENT

FY22

Total renewable electricity
consumption as a percentage
of total facility electricity
consumption.

DoD

8.4%

ARMY

12.5%

NAVY

4.4%

USMC

16.1%

USAF

7.8%

DoD

15.9%

ARMY

15.9%

NAVY

34.2%

USMC

10.4%

USAF

8.3%

Title 42 U.S.C. § 15852(a) –EPAct 2005

Produce or Procure More
Energy from Renewable
Sources
Title 10 U.S.C. § 2911(g)Total renewable energy(electric & non-electric)
produced or procured as apercentage of total facility
electricity consumption.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

GOAL

7.5%

25%
by 2025

29

Renewable Energy Project Deployment
DoD pursues renewable and other carbon-pollution free energy to support and advance installation energy
and climate resilience, while also complying with legal requirements to increase its renewable energy
supply. DoD continues to invest in an array of cost effective renewable and distributed energy solutions
such as solar photovoltaic (PV), wind, and geothermal technologies, as well as deploying on-site energy
storage solutions. The DoD focuses renewable energy investments using IEPs and Service installationlevel assessments to identify locations and facilities where the greatest benefit in energy resilience
improvement and greenhouse gas emissions reduction can be achieved.
Over the past two years, the DoD has initiated actions to deploy advanced nuclear and advanced
geothermal technologies to satisfy installation energy needs. In FY22, the DAF issued a Request for
Information (RFI) seeking industry input on cutting-edge, closed loop, deep well geothermal
technologies. In addition, the DAF has selected Eielson AFB as the preferred location to pilot its firstmicro-reactor, targeted to be operational by 2027. DAF is partnering with the Defense Logistics Agency(DLA) Energy office to execute a power purchase agreement (PPA) with a third-party developer.

Figure 8. FY22 Total Renewable Energy Projects and Energy Produced or Procured in BBtu by TypeAs detailed in the January 2023 CFE Strategy Plan, the Department obtained 34 percent of its electricity
from Carbon Pollution Free Sources in FY21. The percentage of DoD electricity obtained from Carbon
Pollution Free Sources in FY22 will be included in the update of the CFE Strategy Plan, expected to bereleased July 2023. DoD aims to transition to 100 percent CFE on an annual basis by FY 2030, with atleast 50 percent of demand matched to CFE regional supply on an hourly basis in accordance with
Executive Order (EO) 14057. 13 To achieve this goal, in FY22 the DoD began an evaluation of changes toorganizational structures and acquisition methods. DoD anticipates close coordination with othergovernment agencies going forward, especially the General Services Administration (GSA) and theDepartment of Energy (DOE), in a “whole-of-government” approach that leverages the purchasing power

13 E.O 14057: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/12/08/executive-order-on-

catalyzing-clean-energy-industries-and-jobs-through-federal-sustainability/

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2230

of the U.S. Government, as well as combining Service-level contracts to increase purchasing power andencourage utilities to source additional CFE.
The DoD uses various authorities to increase the supply of distributed (on-site) and renewable energy
sources on its installations. DoD uses both appropriated funds and non-Governmental (“third-party” or“alternative”) financing to pursue renewable energy projects. Typically, DoD contracts with non-Federal
entities to enable the development of large-scale renewable (or other distributed) energy projects, using
third-party financing to fund the initial project costs. DoD also relies on Congressional appropriations tofund cost-effective, small-scale distributed generation projects that do not require third-party financing.
Table 7. Renewable Energy Projects

Facility-Related Control Systems
In FY22, ODASD(E&ER) funded four more Control System Resilience Readiness Exercises (CRRE)
pilot exercises (two to be conducted in FY23 and two in FY24), one at each of the Services. Following
completion of the CRRE pilot exercises, a CRRE framework and OSD Policy will be written, turning the
conducting of CRRE exercises into a mandatory, annual exercise.
Funding was the result of a successful live cyber resilience readiness exercise, under sponsorship ofODASD(E&ER), that was performed on an active DoD installation over a 12-hour period in FY21, in
conjunction with a BSE. The privatized utility power was disconnected via cyber means anddemonstrated two different cyber effects on both mission-owned and real-property control systems. The
findings from the planning, execution, analysis, and reporting from this live-fire cyber exercise were
impactful and actionable for the installation, critical mission partner, and military department that hosted
the exercise. The success of the exercises demonstrated the broad range of control systems that can
impact mission resilience; the variability in understanding, coordination, and ownership of the relevant
systems; and the fact that making broad policy changes at the OSD-level and changes to service-level

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

31

escalation pathways is premature without continued effort to understand the scope of the problems
encountered.
ODASD(E&ER) also manages the wider DoD Enterprise
FRCS Cybersecurity Program and issues the annual Managing
Cyber-risks to FRCS guidance that outlines a process forowners and operators of FRCS connected to the DoD
Information Network (DoDIN) to account for operational
resilience and cybersecurity defense posture.
ODASD(E&ER) collects plans annually to document anddashboard progress in cyber-securing the DoD’s FRCS.

https://media.careersinthemilitary.com/citmimages/0040.02.jpg.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

32

Appendix A - List of Acronyms
AcronymDefinition

AAP

Army Ammunition Plant

ACC

Air Combat Command

ACICS TTP

Advanced Cyber Industrial Control Systems Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures

ACS

Army Climate Strategy

ACS-IP

Army Climate Strategy Implementation Plan

AEMRR

Annual Energy Management and Resilience Report

AEPRR

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report

AETP

Advanced Engine Transition Program

AEWRS

Army Energy and Water Reporting System

AF/A4

HQ USAF Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, Engineering, and Force Protection

AFB

Air Force BaseAFCEC

Air Force Civil Engineer Center

AFIMSCAir Force Installation and Mission Support Center

AFIT

Air Force Institute of Technology

AFN

Advanced Facilities Network

AFRL/RXAir Force Materials and Manufacturing Directorate

AFSOC

Air Force Special Operations Command

AFWIC

Air Force Warfighting Integrating Capability

AI/ML

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

AMI

Advanced Meter Infrastructure

ANGB

Air National Guard Base

APAR

Auxiliary Prestage Area Refrigeration

ARE

Navy Assistant Regional Engineer

ARMS

Aviation Resource Management System

ARNG

Army National Guard

ASA(IE&E)

Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and Environment

ASD(Sustainment)

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment

ASD(EI&E)

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations and Environment

ASN(EI&E)

Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations and Environment

ATO

Authorization to Operate

ATS

Automatic Transfer Switch

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2233

Acronym

DefinitionBAS

Building Automation Systems

BBtu

Billion British Thermal Units

BESS

Battery Energy Storage System

BOS

Base Operations Support

BSE

Black Start Exercise

Btu

British Thermal Unit

C2D2Command & Control Decision Delivery

CAAFI

Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative

CDDs

Capability Decision Documents

CECOS

Civil Engineer Corps Officers School

CEM

Certified Energy Manager

CFE

Carbon Pollution-Free Electricity

CIO

Chief Information Officer

CIRCUITS

Navy Centralized and Integrated Reporting for the Comprehensive Utilities Information Tracking System

CNIC

Commander, Navy Installations Command

CNIC N42

CNIC BOS Programs

CNO

Office of the Chief of Naval Operations

COA

Course of Action

COMMCICOM

Commander Marine Corps Installations Command

CONUS

Continental United States

CRRE

Control System Resilience Readiness Exercise

CS

Control System

CSG

Executive Agent Component Steering GroupDAF

Department of the Air Force

DARPA

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

DASA(E&S)

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Energy and Sustainability

DASA(IE&E)

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy, and Environment

DASD(E&ER)

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Environment and Energy Resilience

DASN(I&F)

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Installations & Facilities

DCA

Defense Critical Asset

DCI

Defense Critical Infrastructure

DC I&L

USMC Deputy Commandant for Installations and Logistics

DCMA

Defense Contract Management Agency

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2234

Acronym

Definition

DCS

Deputy Chief of Staff

DDoS

Distributed Denial of Service

DDSP

DLA Defense Distribution Depot Susquehanna

DeCA

Defense Commissary Agency

DepSecDef

Deputy Secretary of Defense

DERB

Defense Energy Resilience BankDFAS

Defense Finance and Accounting Service

DIA

Defense Intelligence Agency

DLA

Defense Logistics Agency

DMO

Distributed Maritime Operations

DoD

Department of Defense

DoDD

DoD Directive

DoDI

DoD InstructionDoDIN

DoD Information Network

DOE

Department of Energy

DoN

Department of the Navy

DPW

Directorate of Public WorksDR

Demand Response

DSCC

DLA Defense Supply Center Columbus

DSCR

DLA Defense Supply Center Richmond

DUERS

Navy Defense Utility Energy Reporting System

DUSD(I&E)

Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment)

DWAG

Defense Wargame Alignment Group

EABO

Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations

EAS

Eareckson Air Station

ECIP

Energy Conservation and Investment Program

EIA

Energy Information Administration

eKPP

Energy Key Performance Parameter

EMCS

Energy Management Control System

EMIG

Navy Energy Mission Integration Group

Energy, HPD

Navy Energy Headquarters Program Director

EO

Executive Order

EPAct 2005

Energy Policy Act of 2005

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2235

Acronym

Definition

ERA Tool

Energy Resilience Assessment Tool

ERCIP

Energy Resilience Conservation and Investment Program

ERP

Energy Readiness R&D Program

ERTTX

Energy Resilience Tabletop Exercise

ES2

Army’s Energy Security and Sustainability Strategy

ESPC

Energy Savings Performance Contract

ESPO

Navy Energy Security Programs Office

ESTCP

Environmental Security Technology Certification Program

EUL

Enhanced Use Lease

EVSE

Electric Vehicle Support Equipment

F2EP

Office of Future Force Energy & Power

FAR

Federal Acquisition Regulation

FCAB

Federal Consortium for Advanced Batteries

FCBs

Functional Capability Boards

FEC

Navy Facility Engineering Command

FEMP

Federal Energy Management Program

FIERCE

CSAF Blue Horizons Project - Forward Integrated Energy Resourcing for Contested Environments

FRAGO

Fragmentary Order

FRCS

Facility-Related Control Systems

FY

Fiscal Year

FYDP

Future Years Defense Program

GBFMD

Global Bulk Fuel Management and Delivery

GENISYS

Navy Global Energy Information System

GIS

Geographic Information Systems

GSA

General Services Administration

GSHP

Ground Source Heat Pump

HAC

House Appropriations Committee

HASC

House Armed Services Committee

HEL

High-Efficacy Lighting

HQ

Headquarters

HQDA

Headquarters Department of the Army

HQ USAF

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

HVAC

Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2236

Acronym

Definition

ICIntelligence Community

ICAO

International Civil Aviation Organization

ICO

Installation Commanding Officer

ICRP

Installation Climate Resilience Plans

IE

Installation Energy

IEM

Installation Energy Manager

IEP

Installation Energy Plan

IEWP

Army Installation Energy and Water Plan

IGSAIntergovernmental Support Agreement

IMM

Integrated Materiel Manager

INFADSInternet Navy Facilities Asset Data StoreIPRB

Installation Planning and Review Board

IoTInternet of Things

ISR-MC

Army Installation Status Report – Mission Capacity

IT

Information Technology

JB

Joint BaseJBAB

Joint Base Anacostia Bolling

JCS

Joint Chiefs of Staff

JLENT

Joint Logistics Enterprise

JLTV

Joint Light Tactical Vehicles

JMAA

Joint Mission Assurance Assessment

JPEC

Joint Petroleum Executive Council

JSPG

Joint Petroleum Steering GroupkV

Kilovolt, 1 thousand Volts

KSF

Thousand Square Feet

KW

Kilowatt, 1 thousand Watts

KWh

Kilowatt-hours

LC

Liquid Chromatography

LED

Light-Emitting Diode

LF

Launch Facility

LFG

Landfill Gas

L-GRiP

Low-Gamma Radioisotope Propulsion

LHC

Land Holding Command

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2237

Acronym

Definition

LNG

Liquefied Natural Gas

LPG

Liquefied Petroleum Gas

MAF

Mobility Air ForceMAF C2

Mobility Air Forces Command and Control

MCAGCC

Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center

MCAS

Marine Corps Air Station

MCICOM

Marine Corps Installations Command

MCICOM GF

MCICOM, Facilities Directorate

MCICOM GF-PW

MCICOM, Public WorksMCLB

Marine Corps Logistics BaseMCRDMarine Corps Recruit Depot

MEEP

Air Force Mission Execution Excellence Program

MDA

Missile Defense Agency

MDMS

Meter Data Management System

MILCON

Military Construction

MIT-LL

Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Lincoln Laboratory

MMBtu

Million British Thermal Units

MMTCO2eMillion Metric Tons Carbon Dioxide Equivalent

MOSAICS

More Situational Awareness for Industrial Control Systems

MW

Megawatt, 1 million Watts

MWh

Megawatt-Hour, 1 million Watt-hours

NAS

Naval Air Station

NAVFAC

Naval Facilities Engineering Command

NBGTS

Naval Base Guam Telecommunications Site

NDAA

National Defense Authorization Act

NDS

National Defense Strategy

NECPA

National Energy Conservation Policy Act

NGA

National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

NGAP

Next-Generation Adaptive Propulsion Program

NILM

Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring Prototype Technology

NIST CSF

National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework

NITMRE

Next Gen Information Technology for Mobility Readiness Enhancement

NREL

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

38

Acronym

Definition

NRO

National Reconnaissance Office

NRTF

Naval Radio Transmitter Facility

NSA

National Security Agency

NSA

Naval Supply Activity

NSB

Naval Submarine BaseNTV

Non-Tactical Vehicle

OASD(Sustainment)

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment

OCO

Overseas Contingency OrganizationODASD(E&ER)

Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Environment & Energy Resilience

ODASD(DC&MA)

Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Defense Continuity and Mission Assurance

OE

Operational Energy

OEA

Air Force Office of Energy Assurance

OEI

Army Office of Energy Initiatives

OECIF

Operational Energy Capability Improvement FundOEPF

Operational Energy Prototyping Fund

OMB

Office of Management and Budget

OM&T

Operations, Maintenance, and Testing

OPLANS

Operational Plans

OPNAV N41

CNO Shore Installations Division

OSD

Office of the Secretary of Defense

OT

Operational Technology

PACAF

Pacific Air Forces

PDM

Program Decision Memorandum

PDU

Power Distribution Unit

PEO-BES

Program Executive Office Business Enterprise Systems

PHI

Protected Health Information

PII

Personally Identifiable Information

PLC

Programmable Logic Controller

PMO

Program Management Office

PPA

Power Purchase Agreement

PPBE

Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution

PV

Photovoltaic

PWD

Public Works Department

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2239

Acronym

Definition

PWO

Public Works Officer

PW6

Navy FEC Utilities Management Office

PW8

Navy FEC Energy Management Office

RASP

Navy Replenishment at Sea Planner

RDT&E

Research, Development, Test & EvaluationREC

Renewable Energy Credit

REGCOM

Navy Regional Commander

REPM

Navy Regional Energy Program Manager

RMF

Risk Management Framework

RFI

Request for Information

RFP

Request for Proposal

RPAD

Real Property Assets Database

SAF/IE

Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Installations, Environment & Energy)

SAF/IEE

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force Environment, Safety and Infrastructure

SASC

Senate Armed Services Committee

SBIR

AFWERX Small Business Innovation Research Program

SCADA

Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition

SIR

Savings to Investment Ratio

SIS

Industrial Safety Systems

SMR

Small Modular Reactor

SoS

System of Systems

SRM

Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization

TACV-E

Tactical and Combat Vehicle - Electrification

TCA

Task Critical Asset

TEARF

Test and Evaluation of Alternative Rocket Fuels

TIM

Technical Interchange MeetingTO

Task Order

TTX

Energy Resilience Table-Top Exercise

TWCF

Transportation Working Capital FundUAS

Unmanned Aerial System

UESC

Utility Energy Service Contract

UFC

Unified Facilities Criteria

UMCS

Utility Monitoring and Control System

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2240

Acronym

Definition

UP

Utilities Privatization

UPS

Uninterruptible Power Supply

U.S.

United States

USACE

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

USAF

U.S. Air Force

USAFE

U.S. Air Forces Europe

USAG

U.S. Army Garrison

U.S.C.

U.S. Code

USC

Utility Service Contract

USCYBERCOM

U.S. Cyber Command

USD(A&S)

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment

USMC

U.S. Marine Corps

USSF

U.S. Space ForceUSTRANSCOM

U.S. Transportation CommandvSMR

Very Small Modular Reactor

WEEC

World Energy Engineering Congress

WHS

Washington Headquarters Services

ZEV

Zero-Emission Vehicle

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

41

Appendix B - Congressional Reporting Requirements
Section 2925(a) of title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.) requires the Secretary of Defense to provide “areport detailing the fulfillment during that fiscal year of the authorities and requirements under Sections
2688, 2911, 2912, 2920, and 2926 of this title, including progress on energy resilience at military
installations and the use of operational energy in combat platforms and at contingency locations.”
The FY22 Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report (AEPRR) satisfies the DoD’s
statutory reporting requirements pursuant to the following:•

Title 42 U.S.C. § 8258, which requires Federal agencies to describe their energy management activities in areport to the Secretary of Energy;•

Title 10 U.S.C. § 2925(a), which requires DoD to submit to Congress an AEPRR describing its installationenergy activities;•

Title 10 U.S.C. § 2688 (g)(4), which requires DoD to report progress in meeting energy resilience metrics
for all utility conveyance contracts entered into;•

Title 10 U.S.C. § 2911(c), which requires DoD to establish and report energy performance goals fortransportation systems, support systems, utilities, and infrastructure and facilities;•

Title 10 U.S.C. § 2912 (e)(3), which requires DoD to report a detailed description of the use of funds
attained from energy cost savings realized by the Department; and•Title 10 U.S.C. § 2926 (e)(4), which requires DoD to provide proposed operational energy budgets for eachof the Services as well as an operational energy strategy and updates to the strategy every 5 years.

The Compliance Matrix in Appendix C provides all reporting requirements and requests satisfied by thisreport, including the following additional report requests:•••

House Report (HR) 117–397, accompanying HR 7776, the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2023:−

Department of Defense Report on Military Installation Grid Resiliency−

Energy Conservation Measures at Installations−

Utilities Privatization−

Wireless Electric Vehicle Charging for Military Installations

Senate Report 117–130, accompanying HR 7776, the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2023:−

Bidirectional charging of alternatively fueled vehicles−

Natural gas and propane generators−

Energy resiliency of bases supporting nuclear deterrence missions

Public Law 117-81, S.1605, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022−•

Maintenance of current analytical tools in evaluating energy resilience measures (Section 314)

Fiscal Year 2022 Senate Appropriations Committee Report 117-35−

Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (p. 16)

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2242

•

JES accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021−

Report on implementation of renewable fuel pump requirements (p. 86)

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

43

Appendix C - Compliance Matrix
FY22 AEPRR
Chapter/Appendix

Page
Number(b)(1)(A)A description of the progress made to achieve the goals of theEnergy Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-58), section 2911(g) of
this title, and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
(Public Law 110-140).

Appendix D, 4

32, 10,15(b)(1)(B)A description of the energy savings, return on investment, andenhancements to installation mission assurance realized by thefulfillment of the goals described in subparagraph (A).

4-(b)(1)(C)A description of and progress toward the energy security,
resilience, and performance goals and master planning for the
Department of Defense, including associated metrics pursuant tosubsections (c) and (d) of section 2911 of this title andrequirements under section 2688(g) of this title.

Appendix D32(b)(1)(D)An evaluation of progress made by the Department in implementing
the operational energy strategy of the Department, including the
progress of key initiatives and technology investments related tooperational energy demand and management.

Chapter 3

Subsection(a)(b)(1)(E)
Title 10 U.S.C. §2925

Description
Annual Report Related to Installations Energy Performance,
Resilience, and Readiness — Not later than 240 days after the endof each fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to thecongressional defense committees a report detailing the fulfillment
during that fiscal year of the authorities and requirements under
sections 2688, 2911, 2912, 2920, and 2926 of this title, including
progress on energy resilience at military installations and the use ofoperational energy in combat platforms and at contingency
locations.

Details of the amounts of any funds transferred by the Secretary of
Defense pursuant to section 2912 of this title, including a detailed
description of the purpose for which such amounts have been used.

Chapter 3(b)(2)

Statistical information on operational energy demands of the
Department, in terms of expenditures and consumption, for thepreceding five fiscal years, including information on funding madeavailable in regular defense appropriations Acts and any
supplemental appropriations Acts.

Chapter 3(b)(3)A description of each initiative related to the operational energy
strategy of the Department and a summary of funds appropriatedfor each initiative in the previous fiscal year and current fiscal year
and requested for each initiative for the next five fiscal years.

Chapter 3(b)(4)Such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for
additional changes in organization or authority within the
Department to enable further implementation of the energy strategy
and such other comments and recommendations as the Secretaryconsiders appropriate.

Appendix G

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

-

68

44

Description

FY22 AEPRR
Chapter/Appendix

Page
Number(c)(1)The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Congressional defense
committees the energy performance goals for the Department of
Defense regarding transportation systems, support systems,
utilities, and infrastructure and facilities.

Appendix D32(c)(3)The Secretary of Defense shall include the energy security andresilience goals of the Department of Defense in the installationenergy report submitted under Section 2925(a) of this title for
Fiscal Year 2018 and every fiscal year thereafter. In thedevelopment of energy security and resilience goals, theDepartment of Defense shall conform with the definitions of energy
security and resilience under this title. The report shall include theamount of critical energy load, together with the level of availability
and reliability by fiscal year the Department of Defense deems
necessary to achieve energy security and resilience.

Chapter 4

12-13(d)(1)The Secretary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive masterplan for the achievement of the energy performance goals of the
Department of Defense, as set forth in laws, executive orders, andDepartment of Defense policies.

Appendix D32(g)(4)The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of themilitary departments, shall include in the installation energy reportsubmitted under Section 2925(a) of this title a description ofprogress in meeting energy resilience metrics for all conveyancecontracts entered into pursuant to this section.

Chapter 4

13(e)(3)At the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to Congress a report detailing any funds transferred pursuant toparagraph (1) during that fiscal year, including a detailed
description of the purpose for which such amounts have been used.

Chapter 3-(g)(1)

If by the end of fiscal year 2029, the Secretary determines that the
Department will be unable to meet the requirements undersubsection (a), not later than 90 days after the end of such fiscal
year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a reportdetailing the projected shortfall;

Chapter 4-(g)(2)

reasons for the projected shortfall;

Chapter 4-(g)(3)

any statutory, technological, or monetary impediments to achieving
such requirements;

Chapter 4-(g)(4)

any impact to readiness or ability to meet the national defense
posture; andChapter 4-(g)(5)

any other relevant information as the Secretary considers
appropriate.

Chapter 4-

Subsection

Title 10 U.S.C. §2911

Title 10 U.S.C. §2688

Title 10 U.S.C. §2912

Title 10 U.S.C. §2920

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

45

Subsection

Description

FY22 AEPRR
Chapter/Appendix(e)(4)

Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget for fiscal
year 2024 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of
title 31, and every five years thereafter, the Assistant Secretary shallsubmit to the congressional defense committees the strategy
required under paragraph (1).

Page 87

Natural Gas and Propane Generators

Appendix M

Page 117

Briefing on Bidirectional Charging

Appendix K

Page 291

Energy Resiliency of Bases Supporting Nuclear Deterrence Missions

Appendix J

Page 82

Department of Defense Report on Military Installation Grid
Resiliency

Appendix O

Page 82

Energy Conservation Measures at Installations

Appendix S

Page 388

Utilities Privatization

Appendix N

Page 388

Wireless Electric Vehicle Charging for Military Installations

Appendix L

Public Law 11781, S.1605, theNational Defense
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2022

Section314

Maintenance of Current Analytical Tools in Evaluating Energy
Resilience Measures

Appendix R

Senate Report117-35 – Military
Construction,
Veterans Affairs,
and Related
Agencies
Appropriations Bill

Page 16

Electric Vehicle Infrastructure

Appendix Q

JES accompanying
the National
DefenseAuthorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2021

Page 86

Report on Implementation of Renewable Fuel Pump Requirements

Appendix P

Title 10 U.S.C. §2926

Report 117-130:
SASC FY22
Committee Report

Report 117-397:
HASC FY22
Committee Report

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

Page
Number46

Appendix D - Energy Performance Master Plan
D.1. Energy Performance Master Plans
Title 10 U.S.C § 2911(d)(1) and (2) requires
the Secretary of Defense and each military
department and defense agency to develop
comprehensive master plans for theachievement of DoD energy performancegoals. This has been accomplished throughthe development of comprehensive
installation and energy master plans by each
Component.

Installation energy is the energy necessary to support thefunctions of over 400 fixed installations on nearly 29
million acres of land within the United States andinternationally. This energy is distinct from operationalenergy, which consists largely of mobility fuel that isused by operational aircraft, ships, and tanks, as well as
generators at forward operating bases.

Installation Energy Plans (IEPs) incorporate installation, Component, and higher-level guidance into aholistic roadmap that enables the installation to work toward its energy efficiency, renewable energy,
energy resilience, and climate resilience goals. Energy resilience exercise outputs are combined withanalyses from the Defense Climate Assessment Tool (DCAT) and data from the DoD Regional Sea Level
Database to inform the IEPs. The IEPs, in turn, are used to inform the installation resilience plans (IRPs),
required by title 10 U.S.C. § 2864 (a)(2), which then are incorporated into the installation masterplanning process and feed into the installation master plan.
Overall, an IEP directs a structured and effective approach to selecting, prioritizing, sequencing, andimplementing, energy projects and programs that ultimately result in better long-term installation energy
performance. IEPs should be developed in coordination with other installation plans. Every effort should
be made to integrate the IEP development process for developing master plans. While the IEP must becompatible with the installation-level master plan, the IEP should be either a stand-alone document or aseverable product within the master plan. IEPs should be continuously maintained, incorporating
projects’ lessons learned and synchronizing with the annual energy reporting process.

D.2. Energy Performance Goals
The DoD energy goals in Tables C-1 and C-2 are set forth by title 42 U.S.C. § 15852(a) and title 10
U.S.C. § 2911(g). These goals focus on renewable energy use. The Department remains committed tomaximizing the efficient use of energy to free up resources for higher priorities. With respect torenewable energy, the DoD strives to optimize the use of on-site distributed energy resources from all
sources of energy generation to directly improve mission assurance. The type of generation source isdetermined by local availability, market conditions, a business case, or mission requirements. As such,the Department is committed to optimizing the effective and efficient use of generating sources.
Section 2911(c)(3) of title 10 U.S.C. requires DoD to include installation energy security and resilience
goals in this report and subsequent AEPRRs. In FY22, DoD components continued use of BSEs andother energy assessments to conduct full-scale and routine testing on the infrastructure and equipment
supporting all critical energy requirements and determine energy availability at the mission level. In
FY22, the Services successfully conducted 16 independent, full-scale exercises. Planning is in progressfor additional BSE frameworks, such as cybersecurity modules.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

47

Table D-1. DoD Renewable Energy Goal
Goal
Consume More Electric
Energy from Renewable
Sources
Title 42 U.S.C. §15852(a)Produce or Procure
More Energy from
Renewable Sources
Title 10 U.S.C. §2911(g)Description

Uniform Measure

Method of Measurement

MetricIncrease consumption ofrenewable energy

Installation renewable energy
consumption

Total renewable electricity consumption
as a percentage of total facility electricity
consumption.

MWH

Increase production or
procurement of
renewable energy

Electric and non-electric
renewable energy production
and procurement.

Electric and non-electric renewableenergy produced or procured compared
to total facility electricity consumption.

MWH

Table D-2. Renewable Energy Performance Targets
Target

FY11

FY12

FY13

FY14

FY15

FY16

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY25

Consume More Renewable
Energy

+5%

+5%

+7.5%

+7.5%

+7.5%

+7.5%

+7.5%

+7.5%

+7.5%

+7.5%

+7.5%

Produce/Procure More
Renewable Energy 1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

+15%

-

-

+25%

1FY18 interim target required by Title 10 U.S.C. § 2911(g)(2)Table D-3. Critical Energy Availability
Target100% of critical mission energy load
has a minimum of at least 99.9% orhigher availability by FY30

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

FY24

FY25

FY26

FY27

FY28

FY29

FY30

-

-

-*

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

99.9+%

10 U.S.C. § 2920
*Specific availability standards between 99.9 and 99.9999% availability per fiscal year (depending on criticality of mission), and interim
goals prior to FY25, may be established by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to Title 10 U.S.C. § 2920.

Table D-4. Black Start Exercises
TargetEach military department will conduct not fewer than 5 BSEs per year
through FY27
Title 10 U.S.C. § 2920

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

FY24

FY25

FY26

FY27

-

-

15

15

15

15

15

15

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

48

Appendix E - DoD Energy Performance Summary
Table E-1. Renewable Electric Energy
Renewable Electric Energy Requirement
per Title 42 U.S.C. 15852(a)Renewable Electricity
Use (MWH)

Total Electricity Use(MWH)Percentage of Facility
Electric Use

EPAct 2005
Requirement

2,401,954.4

28,942,874.2

8.3%

7.5%

Eligible renewable electricity use as apercentage of total electricity use

Table E-2. Procuring Renewable Energy Sources
Produce or Procure More Energy from
Renewable Sources per Title 10 U.S.C.
2911(g)Renewable Energy
Produced/Procured (MWH)

Total Electricity
Use (MWH)

Percentage ofFacility Electric
Use

ComplianceTarget by 2025

4,599,821.5

28,942,874.2

15.9%

25.0%

Total renewable energy (electric & nonelectric) produced or procured as apercentage of total facility electricity
consumption

Table E-3. Goals for Buildings Metered for Electricity
Cumulative # of
Buildings
Metered forElectricity

Cumulative % ofAppropriate
Buildings Meteredfor Electricity

Cumulative # of
Buildings
Metered for
Natural Gas

Cumulative % ofAppropriate
Buildings Meteredfor Natural Gas

Cumulative # of
Buildings
Metered for
Steam

Cumulative % ofAppropriate
Buildings Meteredfor SteamStandard
Meters in
FY22

37,472

61.3%

14,040

29.1%

2,842

7.4%

Advanced
Meters in
FY22

22,406

36.6%

4,830

10.0%

1,033

2.7%

Total
Meters in
FY22

59,87897.9%

18,870

39.1%

3,875

10.1%

Federal Building Energy Efficiency Standards

Percentage of New
Building Designs

ComplianceTargetPercentage of new building designs started since beginning in FY07 that are 30 percent moreenergy efficient than relevant code, where lifecycle cost-effective (including 8/2012
standards)

93.0%

100.0%

Meter Goals

Table E-1. Energy Efficiency Standards for Federal Buildings

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2249

E.1. Investments in Energy Management
Table E-2. Investment Sources for Energy
Investment Value(Thou. $)Anticipated Annual Savings(MMBtu)Direct obligations for facility energy efficiency improvements$19,783.2

59,799.1

Investment value of ESPC Task/Delivery Orders awarded in fiscal year

$203,467.9

369,586.0

Investment value of UESC Task/Delivery Orders awarded in fiscal year

$213,755.3

191,144.0

TOTAL$437,006.4

620,529.1

Sources of Investment

Table E-3. Funding for ESPC/UESC
Investment

Percentage

Total Investment as a percentage of total facility energy cost

10.9%

Financed (ESPC/UESC) investment as a percentage of total facilityenergy costs

10.4%

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

50

Table E-4. Installation Energy Type and Cost
Total Installation Energy Consumption and Cost 14
Energy Type

BBtu

Cost (thou.)% of Consumption

Electricity

95,471.8

2,804,187.0

48.6%

Fuel Oil

14,442.6

292,817.9

7.4%

Natural Gas

73,415.4

666,474.5

37.4%

LPG

857.1

16,908.4

0.4%

Coal

3,520.2

23,602.1

1.8%

Steam

3,048.6

89,529.4

1.6%

Other

1,300.8

4,153.9

0.7%

Renewable Electric, On-site

3,093.4

30,698.0

1.6%

Renewable Electric Off-Site

307.3

14,522.8

0.2%

Renewable, Other, On-Site

1,481.4

3,492.2

0.8%

Renewable, Off-Site Green Energy Purchases

149.6

15,047.8

0.1%

TOTAL BUILDING

196,449.3

3,961,434.1~100%

Non-Tactical Vehicles

6,442.8

197,049.3

TOTAL Building + NTVs

203,530.9

4,158,483.3

14 Total energy consumption and cost does not include on-site produced, renewable energy replacement REC
adjustment.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

51

Appendix F – FY22 Operational Energy Initiatives
ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

B-52H Re-Engine(AQP) Maj Chaney

B-52 Commercial Engine
Replacement Program(CERP)USAF

B-52H Re-Engine

B-52 Commercial Engine
Replacement Program(CERP)USAF

Aerospace
Propulsion (AQR)

Adaptive Engine
Transition Program(AETP)USAF

Aerospace
Propulsion (AQR)
Jerry

Next Generation Adaptive
Propulsion (NGAP)

USAF

Aerospace
Propulsion andPower Technology(Corey - RQ)

Megawatt Aircraft Powerand Thermal

USAF

OE Project Description
This sustainment program will replace the current
unsustainable TF33 engine with engines of similar size,
weight, and thrust characteristics. The development,
production and installation of new engines and related
subsystems will replace legacy equipment on 76 B52H a/c.
This sustainment program will replace the current
unsustainable TF33 engine with engines of similar size,
weight, and thrust characteristics. The development,
production and installation of new engines and related
subsystems will replace legacy equipment on 76 B52H a/c.
Matures adaptive engine technologies through amaturation/risk reduction effort to design, fabricate,
and test the first-ever complete, flight-weight adaptiveengines in preparation for next-gen propulsion systemdevelopment for multiple combat aircraft. Drives
revolutionary progress necessary to guarantee future
U.S. air superiority achieving +25% fuel efficiency,+10% thrust, significantly increased thermal capacity,and maintains full-life durability. Much of the program
is controlled unclassified information with ITAR
restrictions; however, the program office is pursuing anexportability determination.
Like AETP, NGAP matures and demonstrates thescalability of adaptive engine technologies through amaturation/risk reduction effort to design, fabricate,
and test flight-weight prototype engines targeted for
Next-Generation Air Dominance applications. The
program is a mix of controlled unclassified andclassified information with ITAR restrictions.
Integrating new developments in Power and Thermal
components to demonstrate advanced architectures toenable high powered mission systems for future Air
Superiority platforms while maintaining energy
efficiency. Technology maturation in advanced power
and thermal architecture, modeling and simulation,and integration. Developing flexible and adaptive
Power and Thermal components that allow for

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP 15($K)

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

3600

07

0101113F

484,068

1,596,930

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

3010

05

0101113F

0

1,625,004

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

3600

04

0604004F

13,536

3,631,467

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

3600

04

0604004F

110,176

290,933

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform ThermalManagement

3600

03

0603216F

18,483

18,20515 FY2023 – FY2027

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

Treasury
Code

52

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP 15($K)

synergetic architectures that leverage advanced engine
capabilities and energy storage.

USAF

Aerospace Vehicle
Technologies (Corey- RQ)

Attritable Structures(formerly Low Cost
Attritable Aircraft
Technology)

USAF

Aerospace Vehicle
Technologies (Corey- RQ)

Off-Board Sensing
Systems (Formerly Low
Cost Attritable Aircraft
Platform Sharing)

USAF

Materials
Development (Maria
Murphy)Low-Cost Attritable
Structures

USAF

Software and Digital
Technology Pilot
Programs

Air & Space Operations
Center (AOC) - Software
Pilot Program

Develop, prototype and flight-demonstrate a series oflow cost attritable aircraft that can be rapidly
manufactured, in large or small numbers and ondemand, as-needed, for a base platform cost NTE$3M, plus the cost of the mission system/payload. The
capability will enable the Air Force to be able to levy a
cost-imposing strategy on potential adversaries, nearpeer or otherwise, with a focus on the A2AD threat. The
capability will be able to operate as needed withfractionated capabilities, limited training, minimal
maintenance, certified analytically, and economically
produced at very low production quantities.
Develop 2 variants of a long range attritable UAS for$3M AUFC. Define aircraft open architecture concept.
The primary program objective is to build and fly an offboard sensing station (OBSS) variant consistent withthe philosophy and approach of the overarching LCAAT
initiative and the platform-sharing concept. Thisapproach is predicated on the cost and time benefit
inherent in deriving multiple vehicle variant
instantiations from a common shared platform. The
program will include the design, fabrication, and flighttest an OBSS variant in a relevant environment.
This program will provide manufacturing support to the
Low Cost Attritable Aircraft Technology (LCAAT)
Initiative by investigating and validating low-cost
manufacturing materials and processes that can be
introduced to reduce aerospace vehicle costs andminimize vehicle manufacturing time.
This program aims to optimize AOC processes andplanning through agile software solutions. One
example is KRADOS, the Kessel Run All Domain
Operations Suite, a system of applications that
address workflows within the Air Operations Center(AOC). Kessel Run has several applications in use at
the 609th AOC, including the tanker planningapplication Jigsaw, and the Master Air Attack Plan
(MAAP) application Slapshot. The integrated systemallows for accurate and timely data sharing in an
adaptable and complete system. KRADOS calculates
solutions, offers a network of data delivery options,and provides real-time plans to inform decisionmakers. A second example is Pythagoras, which builds
on the existing tanker planning tool, Jigsaw, by adding
an auto-planning feature to match refueling requests

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

Supply Chain
Resilience

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3600

02

0602201F

5,053

27,819Supply Chain
Resilience

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3600

03

0603211F

36,78874,541

Supply Chain
Resilience

Materials andDesign3600

030603680F

2,521

49,083

Supply Chain
Resilience

Current
Operations Tools

3600

08

0608410F

12,00030,00053

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

USAF

Tech Transition
Program

Mobility Asset
Optimization

USAF

Tech Transition
Program

Blended Wing Body
Aircraft Prototype (PhaseI)

OE Project Description
with tankers to optimize tanker utilization - Added
capability aims to increase scheduling efficiency
through optimization algorithms implemented by
Kessel Run. Goal is to provide capability within Jigsaw
for planners to quickly develop a feasible, optimized
aerial refueling schedule, accounting for a host of
constraints and planner judgement.
This program will enhance the efficiency of Mobility Air
Fleet (MAF) operations through tools that optimize
processes such as cargo loading, aircrew scheduling,
and aircraft allocation. Optimized cargo load plansyield more efficient flight operations, and thepossibility to decrease fuel use by maximizing loads
and utilizing fewer aircraft. Improved load planningalso requires a reassessment of under-loaded longdistance flights. Loading techniques range from bilevel aircraft loading system, to dynamic re-planningsoftware, to dual-rail swap and aggregation. For
aircrew scheduling, Puckboard is a data-informed
software application that plans aircrew flight
qualification and ground training events. The tool,
developed by and for Airmen, allows schedulers to
rapidly match aircraft commanders, pilots, andloadmasters with available flights that complete
currency requirements. Digital interface enables
planners to visualize flight schedules and generateschedules for aircrew while considering required
qualifications, crew rest, and conflicts. Overall
increases in operational efficiency are expected. For
aircraft allocation, Magellan is Air Mobility Command’s
readiness-driven allocation process software program
to synchronize aircraft and crew data, coordinate
allocation cycles, enable real-time changes. These
tools allow the force to fly more missions with the sameamount of aircraft.
Cargo, tanker, and non-stealth bomber aircraft
account for approximately 40% of the DOD’s total
annual operational energy consumption: about 1.2B
gallons per year. Reducing this number reduces energy
logistics risks, a significant challenge in vast theaters
such as the Pacific. Beyond legacy aircraft dragreduction initiatives and improved propulsion
sustainment technologies, significant efficiency
potential lies within revolutionary improvements inaircraft design and systems. Shifting cargo, tanker,
and non-stealth bomber aircraft from tube-and-wing
designs to blended wing body (BWB) designs, via ademonstrator aircraft, would yield a minimum 30%

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeSupply Chain
Resilience

Supply Chain
Resilience

Current
Operations Tools

3600

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3600

54

ProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP 15($K)

040604858F

18,00058,000040604858F

15,5000ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

USAF

Tech Transition
Program

Blended Wing Body
Aircraft Prototype

USAF

Tech Transition
Program

Energy Supply Chain Risk
Model

Mission Execution
Excellence Program

USAF

AF Energy ProgramOE Project Description
increase in range and payload capabilities from current
Air Force capabilities, and a corresponding 30%
reduction in emissions. Much like the development of
the KC-135 and Boeing 707, advancing BWB designs
at present will have a synergistic effect on the U.S.
commercial aerospace sector, including bothpassenger and cargo aircraft. This project, inpartnership with industry and other U.S. Government
agencies, accelerates large aircraft performance
improvement for the DOD by providing an alternative to
traditional 20th century tube-and-wing aircraft for
aerial tankers.
Cargo, tanker, and non-stealth bomber aircraft
account for approximately 40% of the DOD’s total
annual operational energy consumption: about 1.2B
gallons per year. Reducing this number reduces energy
logistics risks, a significant challenge in vast theaters
such as the Pacific. Beyond legacy aircraft dragreduction initiatives and improved propulsion
sustainment technologies, significant efficiency
potential lies within revolutionary improvements inaircraft design and systems. Shifting cargo, tanker,
and non-stealth bomber aircraft from tube-and-wing
designs to blended wing body (BWB) designs, via ademonstrator aircraft, would yield a minimum 30%
increase in range and payload capabilities from current
Air Force capabilities, and a corresponding 30%
reduction in emissions. Much like the development of
the KC-135 and Boeing 707, advancing BWB designs
at present will have a synergistic effect on the U.S.
commercial aerospace sector, including bothpassenger and cargo aircraft. This project, inpartnership with industry and other U.S. Government
agencies, accelerates large aircraft performance
improvement for the DOD by providing an alternative to
traditional 20th century tube-and-wing aircraft for
aerial tankers.

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP 15($K)

Supply Chain
Resilience

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3600

04

0604858F0230,000

Develops methods and tools to inform energy supply
chain risk reduction efforts

Supply Chain
Resilience

Current
Operations Tools

3600

04

0604858F

06,500

The MEEP program aims to incentivize operational
units toward fuel-efficient operations such as:precision fuel planning, engine start technique, cruise
altitude selection, descent profile, and reduced engine
taxi. Based on historical data analysis, AF planners
and operators require incentives to use fuel more
efficiently and become an energy-optimized force.
SAF/IEN, the AF Operational Energy Office, created a

EnergyDemandReduction

Policy andOversight

3400

04

0905015F

3,000

72,500

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

55

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

USAF

AF Energy Program

Engine Detergent Wash
(KC-135, C-5, B-52, E-3)

USAF

AF Energy Program

Operational Energy
Education

USAF

Aircraft Engine
Component
Improvement
Program

USAF

C-17

USAF

KC-135

USAF

C-130

Mobility Aircraft Engine
Compressor Blade
Scanning/Coating
Technology for Increased
Fuel Efficiency
Legacy Aircraft Drag
Reduction - C-17 Aft
Body Drag Reduction
Devices and Engine Pylon
Fairings
Legacy Aircraft Drag
Reduction - KC-135
Vertical Windshield
Wipers & Aft Body Drag
Reduction Devices
Legacy Aircraft Drag
Reduction - C-130 Aft
Body Drag Reduction
Devices

OE Project Description
Mission Execution Incentive Strategy to re-alignincentives and remove barriers. This strategy includes acompetitive, voluntary program to incentivize Airmen to
operate with fuel-use optimization in mind. Financial
incentives will aim to create future savings andreinvestment in fuel-efficient education, training, andprograms.
Jet engines ingest debris and contaminants during
operations that reduces their time-on-wing anddecreases engine efficiency and power. This causes
increased fuel burn and exhaust gas temperature,
leading to higher maintenance costs and decreased
aircraft availability. Detergent engine washes reachdeep into the engine core and apply full coverage toengine parts, removing buildup of contaminants.
Detergent washing is expected to improve
performance, reduce engine temperatures, anddecrease fuel burn. This program focuses on the F108
engine, which is the engine used on the KC-135.
Efforts to educate the Air Force and Joint Forceregarding operational energy in DOD warfighting.
Includes coordination with the AF Institute ofTechnology, Naval Post-Graduate School, and Defense
Acquisition University. Includes initiatives such as
curriculum development, force-wide education andstrategic communications campaigns, and university
or FFRDC-led studies to improve understanding ofoperational energy problem sets.
Develops technologies, processes, procedures toleverage commercial airline methods for improving fuelefficiency of legacy aircraft propulsion systems throughsustainment innovation.
Procures and installs aft body drag reduction devices
and engine pylon fairings for C-17 fleet. Expected toresult in a total 1.3% fuel efficiency improvement for C17, which results in approximately $13M/year fuelsavings (based on FY20 fuel prices).
Procures and installs vertical windshield wipers and aft
body drag reduction devices for KC-135 fleet. Expected
to result in a total 2% fuel efficiency improvement for
KC-135, which results in approximately $14M/year
fuel savings (based on FY20 fuel prices).
Procures and installs aft body drag reduction devices
for C-130 fleet. Expected to result in an average 4.5%
fuel efficiency improvement across the C-130 fleet(range: 3-6%), which results in approximately$10M/year fuel savings (based on FY20 fuel prices).

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP 15($K)

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

3400

04

0905015F

600

3,000

Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Policy andOversight

3400

04

0905015F

0

10,000

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

3600

07

0207268F

0

69,000

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3010

05

0401130F

05,500

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3010

05

0401218F

019,500

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3010

05

0401115F

017,50056

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

USAF

Space Solar Power(POC: Tom Shearer CTR - AFRL)

Rigging (Big Data)

USAF

Aerospace Vehicle
Technologies

Legacy aircraft dragreduction (aggregate)

USAF

AF Energy Program

Manpower for Op Energy(two ppl at HQ/energy
office)

USAF

C-17

C-17 Advanced Winglets(proc)USAF

AF Energy Program

Vertical Pallet Stacker Manufacturing

USAF

KC-135

KC-135 Winglets (proc)

USAF

KC-46A

KC-46 Winglets (proc)

USAF
USAF
USAF

Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience
Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience
Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience

OE Project Description
Data mining and meta-analysis of Mobility Air Forceaircraft in-flight data to identify and prioritize small
control surface rigging adjustments that can be madeon individual aircraft to reduce fuel burn and energy
demand. Effort intends to leave behind methods andprocedures to allow the Air Force to accomplish thisorganically moving forward.
Development and implementation of various drag red
initiatives (e.g., HF-antenna, other conformal
antennas, C-5 anti-collision light, others)
Provide technical and data analysis relating to aviationfuel and capabilities; develop, track and report on
operational energy aviation metrics
Procures and installs winglets on C-17 platform thatwill improve aerodynamic efficiency and reduce fuelconsumption
Addresses wasted vertical storage space in C-17/C5/C-130 aircraft - stacks a 463L pallet atop an
already loaded 463L pallet; enable Agile Combat
Employment (ACE); pallet is certified for cargo aircraft;funds will build 50 units for operational use
Procures and installs winglets on KC-135 platform thatwill improve aerodynamic efficiency and reduce fuelconsumption
Procures and installs winglets on KC-46 platform thatwill improve aerodynamic efficiency and reduce fuelconsumption

KC-46 Winglets (RDT&E)

Research and development project on installing
advanced winglets on KC-46 aircraft fleet

C-17 Advanced Winglets(RDT&E)

Research and development project on installing
advanced winglets on C-17 aircraft fleet

Aircraft Engine Wash
(nucleated foam)

USAF

Training

Virtual Reality Training
Devices

USAF

C-17

C-17 Data Bus Recording
System (DBRS) andAnalysis (proc)

Expansion of the nucleated foam wash technology toadditional platforms outside of AFSOC's CV-22 andAC-130J platforms
Realistic 3D virtualized aircraft-specific training that
increases the effectiveness of training, reduces engine
run wear/tear. (C-130J study: 45% reduction in acft
ground time, returned 720 hours to the flightline, with
a $5M avoidance in training/fuel costs
Procure C-17 DBRS - Data software to record, analyze,
and provide and display aircraft system data, provide
troubleshooting and engineering diagnoses, allow inflight analysis and display of trends, faults andanomalies.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

ProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP 15($K)

050604860F

2

0

3600

05

0603211F

0

48,000

Policy andOversight

3400

04

0905015F

0

2,000

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3010

05

0401130F

040,000Current
Operations Tools

3400

04

0905015F

0

10,000

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3010

05

0401218F0

120,000

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3010

05

040101221F

040,000

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3600

05

0604860F

015,000

Platform
Upgrades_Air

3600

05

0604860F

017,000

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

3600

07

0604860F

03,000Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Policy andOversight

3400

05

0401897F

0

10,000Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Current
Operations Tools

3010

04

0401130F

023,000Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility
EnergyDemandReduction
Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility
EnergyDemandReduction
EnergyDemandReduction
EnergyDemandReduction
EnergyDemandReduction
EnergyDemandReduction
EnergyDemandReduction
EnergyDemandReduction

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodePlatform
Upgrades_Air

3600

Platform
Upgrades_Air

57

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

USAF

C-17

C-17 Data Bus Recording
System (DBRS) andAnalysis (RDT&E)

USAF

Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience

Aviato (CAF Scheduling)

USAF

Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience

Air Refueling
Optimization

USAF

Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience

KC-135 and C-17
Warfighter Posture
Predictive Logistics

USAF

Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience

C-17 Mobile Mission
Computer Application for
EFB

USAF

Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience

Augmented Reality
Adversary Air

USAF

Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience

Advanced Distributed
Operations

USAF

Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience

Training Ops Modeling

OE Project Description
Research & Development project - Data software torecord, analyze, and provide and display aircraft
system data, provide troubleshooting andengineering diagnoses, allow in-flight analysis
and display of trends, faults and anomalies.
The Aviato scheduling platform and related ecosystem
extends the training requirements packages developed
by HAF/A3 into squadron-level operations andintegrates maintenance and other requirements,
including deployments, with optimization algorithms
that ensure a ready force of combat aircraft andaircrew.
A comprehensive end-to-end requirements repository,
validation, allocation, mission planning and execution
tool for the entire air refueling enterpriseKC-135 and C--17 data in an AI Predictive Logistics
framework will allow the Air Force to improve thereliability of "last-mile" fuel logistics in aerial
refueling and increase the performance of C-17s andKC-135s, enhancing efficiency. The project will focus
on warfighter postures in the Pacific Theater to enable
Agile Combat Employment concepts with minimal
intratheater lift requirements.
The C--17 mission computer application will allow
aircrew to run calculations and conduct other planningtasks without powering up the aircraft, which uses fuel.
The application will also allow fuel planning
optimization by streamlining calculations.
Enable MAJCOMs to train forces more efficiently andrealistically - increase training opportunities andenable aircrew, Special Tactics and other ground force
mission training to occur almost anywhere, at anytime,with any training partner; provide both in-flight and in
the field training, to include creating immersive,
Blue/Red-Force and threat laden environments, using
both DoD and civilian airspace
Mobility Air Forces require extensive training for
combined or joint operations, but platforms and crew
are not always available in real-time to conduct
training. Advanced Distributed Operations continues
to sustain drop-in real--time virtual training capability
while preparing the technology and warfighter for
distributed operations in contingencies in the future.
SAF/IEN has worked with AETC on a predictive
analytics tool that simulates flight training operations
to inform leadership decision making with respect toaircrew training throughput, aircraft readiness, andAnnual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP 15($K)

Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Current
Operations Tools

3600

04

0401130F

03,000Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Current
Operations Tools

3600

08

0604860F

09,000Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Current
Operations Tools

3600

08

0604860F

012,000Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Current
Operations Tools

3600

08

0604860F

06,600Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Current
Operations Tools

3600

08

0604860F

02,500Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Policy andOversight

3600

04

0604860F

06,000Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Current
Operations Tools

3400

08

0604860F

016,000Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Policy andOversight

3400

05

0604860F

0

1,000

58

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA Code3400

05

ProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP 15($K)

0604860F

014,000

Air & Space
Forces Total

719,7278,233,582

ProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

energy/fuel optimization; increases decision speed
and accuracy in complex training & ops environments

USAF

Operational Energy
and Installation
Resilience

Pilot Training Next

Pilot Training Next infuses a variety of advanced
techniques that can streamline and evolve pilot
training to reduce time in the pipeline and the need foraircraft and fuel to produce pilots ready for Formal
Training Units. Leveraging VR platforms and extensive
instructor interaction, the program can reduce
dependence on T-6 availability by 33%.

Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Policy andOversight

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

Power Initiative for Abrams M1A2SEPv3 (Power ECP)
vehicle - Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) for fuel efficiency

Energy Demand
Reduction

Advance Reliability & Cost Savings (ARCS) for the
AGT-1500 Turbine Engine - Fuel Efficiency ECPORGOE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

ARMY

Abrams Upgrade
Program

Improved Abrams

ARMY

Abrams Upgrade
Program

Improved Abrams

ARMY

Improved Recovery
Vehicle (M88A2
HERCULES)

Improved Recovery
Vehicle (M88A2
HERCULES)

ARMY

Hercules M88A2
UpgradeRecapitalization

Improved Recovery
Vehicle (M88A2
HERCULES)

ARMY

Defense Research
Sciences

CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS
and POWER - 66

ARMY

Defense Research
Sciences

PROPULSION
ENERGETICS FLIGHT - 97

ARMY

Defense Research
Sciences

Air Vehicle Structures
and Dynamics Research 118

Engine Reliability Improvement (Engine Electronic
Fuel Injection (EFI) AVDS 1790); To increase meantime between overhauls (MTBO) from 300 hours to2500 hours
Engine Reliability Improvement (Engine Electronic
Fuel Injection (EFI) AVDS 1790); To increase meantime between overhauls (MTBO) from 300 hours to2500 hours
Basic research to achieve advanced energy control.
Research efforts will lead to: light-weight, reliable,compact power sources.
Basic research for improved understanding of
propulsion and combustion for improved efficiency
and fuel flexibility and fluid dynamics for rotorcraft.
Establish fundamental understanding in structural
damage tracking methods, novel
material/structures, and prognostic and diagnostic
techniques to improve vehicle performance andcapability. This includes the advancement of machinelearning algorithms for deep learning, and the
exploration of novel lightweight, durable, self-sensing
structures for improved maneuver and reduced
maintenance.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

TreasuryCode

BA CodePlatform
Upgrades_Land

2033

01

0211702A

10,77831,874

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2033

01

0211702A

1,060

0Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2033

01

0211700A

038,704

Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2033

01

0211700A

038,704

Alternative Power
Sources

2040

010601102A

5,491

28,216

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

01

0601102A

2,839

15,826

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

01

0601102A

0

5,740

EnergySubstitution andDiversification
EnergySubstitution andDiversification

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

59

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

ARMY

Defense Research
Sciences

Autonomous Vehicle
Research - 120

ARMY

Defense Research
Sciences

Fundamentals for
Alternative Energy
Applied Physics Research
- 143

ARMY

Defense Research
SciencesIntelligent Systems - 48

ARMY

Defense Research
Sciences

Novel multi-fuel tolerant
small vehicle power - 92

ARMY

Defense Research
Sciences

Reconfigurable Platform
Mechanics Propulsion 146

ARMY

Defense Research
Sciences

Research In Vehicle
Mobility - 151

ARMY

Defense Research
Sciences

Sol Struct Mech AMRDEC-AV - 101

ARMY

Defense Research
Sciences

Unmanned Air System(UAS) Vehicle Research 93

ARMYDefense Research
Sciences

Vehicle Propulsion Power
Research - 128

OE Project Description
Basic research focused on enabling robustautonomous mobility for small and human-scalerobotic systems, including autonomous teaming
behavior with hybrid human-robotic teams. Enablers
for robust autonomous mobility include planning,
behaviors, energy efficient maneuver, and theinterface of manipulation technologies to support
manned-unmanned teaming constructs.
Explore novel concepts in energy generation andcapture in technologies for efficient conversion ofambient energy to electrical energy for use andstorage. Design novel structures to include
microscale power devices for multimodal harvestingand efficient distributed power conversion.
Research in autonomous systems that supports andunburdens Soldiers in a flexible, robust, survivableand comprehensive manner. This work addresses the
cognitive requirements of humans and (non-human)
agents, both hardware and software based, operating
individually or in collaboration, on the battlefield.
Basic research to enable highly efficient, multi-fuelconversion in small engines with reduced sensitivity
to fuel property variation and extreme ambientconditions.
Reconfigurable platform mechanics and propulsion
science investigating technologies to enablesubsystem configuration concepts for efficient hoverand high-speed/range Vertical Take-Off and Landing(VTOL) aircraft.
Research in support of advanced military mobility
technologies with emphasis on Terramechanics(vehicle-terrain interaction), and complex vehicle
dynamics and simulation.
Create robust experimental and computational
approaches for understanding, modeling, andpredicting the complex fluid flow and aerodynamics
of next generation rotorcraft concepts.
Basic research focused on topics that contribute to
the body of knowledge required to create future
intelligent, unmanned air systems that can effectively
team with manned and unmanned aircraft, groundplatforms, and human teammates.
Investigate concepts and theories to provide
enhanced tools, methods, and innovative concepts toenable improvements in propulsion power density,
energy efficiency, reliability, and lifecycle costs forincreased performance and capabilities in future
Army systems.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

01

0601102A

1,637

9,361

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

01

0601102A

930

5,012

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2040

01

0601102A

6,164

33,263

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

01

0601102A

3,354

15,834

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

01

0601102A

981

5,291

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

01

0601102A

741

4,128

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

01

0601102A

2,574

13,818EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

01

0601102A

3,018

16,193

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

01

0601102A

1,394

8,464

60

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description
Develop more efficient power and thermal
management for small systems and alternative
energy technologies to substantially reduce thenumber of batteries required to accomplish
dismounted Soldier/Squad mission objectives
Designs, and develops innovative power generationand energy storage technologies that support next
generation Soldier systems to decrease Soldier loadand power burden, and increase power capabilities
by providing more energy to prolong mission runtime.

ARMY

Soldier Lethality
Technology

Efficient Compact
Portable Power - 959

ARMY

Soldier Lethality
Technology

Tactical Power for Soldier
Lethality - 938

ARMY

Ground Technology

Advanced Distributed
Power for Autonomous
Systems

Ground Technology

Power Electronic
Components andMaterials

Research Power Electronic Components andMaterials to enable high power electrification ofmanned and unmanned combat vehicles and otherArmy systems.

Beyond Lithium-Ion
Energy Storage 16

Research Lithium-Ion and other battery technologies
to increase energy storage density.

ARMY

ARMY
ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology

Diesel Electric Power
Generator 15

Research power distribution concepts andarchitectures for autonomous systems.

Research Diesel Electric Power Generator to enablehybrid powertrains for combat vehicles and silent
mobility and watch.
Research Electric Drive Motors, Power Controllers,and Converters to enable hybrid powertrains withelectric drive for silent mobility and watch and to
improve fuel efficiency of manned and unmanned
combat vehicles.
Research High Voltage Modular Li-Ion Battery
technologies to increase energy storage density andenable electrification of manned and unmanned
combat vehicles.

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2040

02

0602143A

910

4,820

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2040

02

0602143A

3,557

36,053

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

02

0602144A

1,423

7,334

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2040

02

0602144A

1,258

0Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

02

0602145A

1,121

6,371

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

02

0602145A

2,143

0EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

02

0602145A

2,874

2,019

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

02

0602145A

2,115

2,401

EnergySubstitution andDiversification
EnergySubstitution andDiversification

ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology

Electric Drive
Motors/Power
Controllers/Conv 18

ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology

High Voltage Modular LiIon Battery 17

ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology

Combat Electric Power
Architecture - 1061

Researches combat vehicle power control
architecture for the heavy combat vehicles

Supply Chain
Resilience

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2040

02

0602145A

0

5,403

ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology

Next Generation Tank
Mobility System (NGTMS)- Power Dense Propulsion
System - 1063

Researches power dense propulsion system for Heavy
Combat Vehicles

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

02

0602145A

0

20,365OMT Traction Turret Drive
Motors Electric CoolingResearches electric traction drive motors for turret
operation.

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2040

02

0602145A

0

2,433

Power Dense Range
Extender Tech

Researches range extending fuel cell design thatuses solid-state energy storage.

Energy Demand
Reduction

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

02

0602145A

0

4,956

ARMY
ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

61

ORG
ARMY
ARMY

OE Program Title
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

RCV Silent Watch andMobility Range Extension

Researches JP8 reformer based silent watch andmobility extension subsystem.

Scaleable Electrification& Control Architecture 19

ARMY

Network C3I
Technology

Energy Efficient Devices
Technology 84

ARMY

Future Vertical Lift
Technology

Future UAS Engine
Technology 01

ARMY

Future Vertical Lift
Technology

High Reduction-Ratio
Transmission (HRT) 63

ARMY

Future Vertical Lift
Technology

Adaptive Power
Component Technologies

ARMY

Future Vertical Lift
Technology

Optimized Energy for
C4ISR Platforms

ARMY

Future Vertical Lift
Technology

Power & ThermalManagement
Components

ARMY

Air Platform Applied
Research

Future UAS Engine
Technology 01

ARMY

Air Platform Applied
Research

High Reduction-Ratio
Transmission (HRT) 63

Research Scaleable Electrification & Control
Architectures to enable electrified and energy
efficient manned and unmanned combat vehicles.
Develop supply and demand electronics for energyconstrained platforms that will extend mission
duration (dismounted Soldier), reduce frequency ofbattery replacement (unattended Sensors) andincrease endurance (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles(UAVs)).
Research to enable intelligent and robust propulsion
performance and noise signature reduction via multifuel and optimized hybrid electric capability for small
engines (20-150kW) powering future aerial andground systems.
Project develops FVL advanced drive traintechnologies that increase performance and double
current drivetrain life cycles while improving theirreliability and maintainability
Project develops power and thermal management
technologies to provide significantly higher electrical
power capability to FVL aircraft while addressing
consequential size, weight and thermal issues.
Provides power capability for advanced electric
aeromechanical effectors, advanced mission systems
algorithms for route planning and teaming, andadvanced electronic warfare devices
Researches power components and control for highpower aviation mission systems.
Project develops power and thermal management
technologies to provide significantly higher electrical
power capability to FVL aircraft while addressing
consequential size, weight and thermal issues.
Provides power capability for advanced electric
aeromechanical effectors, advanced mission systems
algorithms for route planning and teaming, andadvanced electronic warfare devices
Research to enable intelligent and robust propulsion
performance and noise signature reduction via multifuel and optimized hybrid electric capability for small
engines (20-150kW) powering future aerial andground systems.
Project develops FVL advanced drive traintechnologies that increase performance and double

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

Energy Demand
Reduction

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

02

0602145A

2,044

3,239

Energy Demand
Reduction

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2040

02

0602145A

1,430

3,990

Supply Chain
Resilience

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2040

02

0602146A

5,710

27,911

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

02

0602148A

3,153

0

Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

02

0602148A

4,153

0

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Air

2040

02

0602148A

09,950

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

02

0602148A

4,905

26,301

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Air

2040

02

0602148A

2,270

3,628

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

02

0602183A

0

17,698Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

02

0602183A

0

2,993

62

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2040

02

0602184A

0

12,634

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2040

03

0603118A

3,184

22,032

Conventional
Fuels Testing

2040

03

0603119A

460

480

Alternative Fuels
Certification andTesting

2040

030603119A

522

3,072

Enterprise-wide
Energy Visibility

Conventional
Fuels Testing

2040

03

0603119A

292

0current drivetrain life cycles while improving theirreliability and maintainability

ARMY

Soldier Applied
Research

Technologies for
Alternative Energy

ARMY

Soldier Lethality
Advanced
Technology

Soldier Power and Energy
Technology
Demonstration - 936

ARMY

Ground Advanced
Technology

Advanced Tribology
Research 58

ARMYGround Advanced
Technology

ARMY

Ground Advanced
Technology

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology

Enhanced Jet Fuel for
Ground System Durability
56
Fuel Contamination
Limits for Ground
Systems 54

Conducts applied research and development onmaterials and component level power and energy
technologies in the areas of energy storage, power
generation, alternative energy, and intelligent power
distribution and thermal management designs that
support Command, Control, Communications,
Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance andReconnaissance (C4ISR) and Soldier power needs toinclude next generation squad weapons andadvanced optical devices and sensors. ?
Matures, integrates, and demonstrates advanced
Soldier Power and Energy (P&E) technologies topower the dismounted Soldier and small unit's
command and control, communications, computers,
and sensor devices during tactical operations.
Mature tribology techniques to evaluate fluids andfuels.
Evaluate Enhanced Jet Fuel to determine its impact toGround System Durability.
Evaluate Fuel Contamination Limits to establish
standards for military Ground Systems based on
emerging commercial fluids and standards.

EnergySubstitution andDiversification
EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Advanced Mobility
Experimental Prototype 728

Develops advanced powertrain, track and running
gear, and unmanned robotic technologies for
integration into a ground combat vehicle.

Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

03

0603462A

2,819

0Electrification Materials
Technology 11

Develop Electrification Technology in collaboration
with the Department of Energy through the Advanced
Vehicle Power Technology Alliance.

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2040

03

0603462A

2,000

6,487

Diesel Electric Power
Generator 09

Develop Diesel Electric Power Generator to enablehybrid powertrains for combat vehicles and silent
mobility and watch.

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

03

0603462A

1,855

3,651

Electric Drive
Motors/Power
Controllers/Conv 07

Develop Electric Drive Motors, Power Controllers andConverters to enable hybrid powertrains for combat
vehicles and silent mobility and watch.

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

03

0603462A

711

2,828

Extreme Energy Density
Energy Storage

Mature extremely high energy density energy storage
for all-electric combat vehicles with advanced
suspension designs.

Energy Demand
Reduction

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

03

0603462A

08,215

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

63

ProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

030603462A

0

5,229

2040

03

0603462A

1,072

6,088

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

03

0603462A

3,420

0Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

03

0603462A

3,965

9,383

Develop power dense propulsion system for the Next
Generation Tank

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

03

0603462A

0

24,484OMT Traction Turret Drive
Motors Electric Cooling
Advanced Technology

Researches electric traction drive motors for turret
operation.

Energy Demand
Reduction

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2040

03

0603462A

0

7,689

ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology

Tactical and Wheeled
Vehicles Hybrid Electric
SystemSupply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

03

0603462A

0

18,221ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology

Develop integration software for anti-idle, highvoltage energy storage, and hybrid functions ofregenerative braking, electric launch assist, multivehicle power networking node.and mobility
optimization for hybrid-electric tactical vehicles.

Power Dense Range
Extender Adv Technology

Develops range extending fuel cell design that uses
solid-state energy storage.

Energy Demand
Reduction

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

03

0603462A

0

5,818

ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology

RCV Silent Watch andMobility Range Extension
Advanced Technology

Energy Demand
Reduction

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

03

0603462A

1,462

5,377

ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology

Scaleable Electrification
and Control Architecture- 856

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2040

03

0603462A

1,950

7,611

ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology

SiC Gen 4 Electronics
Improvement - 1071

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

03

0603462A

0

17,191

ORG

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

OE Program Title
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeDevelops components for hybrid-electric track drive
combat vehicles.

Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

High Voltage Modular LiIon Battery 10

Develop High Voltage Modular Li-Ion Battery
technologies to increase energy storage density andenable electrification of manned and unmanned
combat vehicles.

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

Highly Electrified andAutonomous Platforms GVSC/AAL 15

Develop electrification components to enable highpower electrification of manned and unmanned
combat vehicles.

Supply Chain
Resilience

Highly Electrified andAutonomous Platforms GVSC/AAL 16

Demonstrate Highly Electrified Autonomous Platform
components and architectures.

Next Generation Tank
Mobility System (NGTMS)- Power Dense Propulsion
System - 1069

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

High Density In-Sprocket
Drive Advanced
Technology

Matures and integrates JP8 reformer components
and sub-systems in order to demonstrate extended
silent watch and mobility as part of a modular
electrification architecture supporting robotic
combat vehicles.
Validates component-level performance andintegrates the power distribution and control
components to implement a common, scalable,
electrified vehicle power architecture on combat
platforms from 15 to 50 tons.
Mature Silicon Carbide-based High Power Electronic
Subsystems for Combat Vehicles.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

64

ORG

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

OE Program Title
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Advanced
Technology

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

Evaluate technologies that mitigate battery supply
chain security issues

Supply Chain
Resilience

System Vehicle
Integration and Test 857

Mature Silicon Carbide-based High Power Electronic
Subsystems for Combat Vehicles.

Platform Electrification EVectronics

Demonstrate Tactical Vehicle Electronics Architecture

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

Battery Technologies for
Supply Chain Security

ARMY

Future Vertical Lift
Advanced
Technology

Alternative Concept
Engine Advanced
Technology 07

ARMY

Future Vertical Lift
Advanced
Technology

Next Generation Aviation
Transmission Adv Tech

ARMY

Future Vertical Lift
Advanced
Technology

Optimized Energy for
C4ISR Platforms Adv
Tech

ARMY

Future Vertical Lift
Advanced
Technology

Power & ThermalManagement Tech Demo

ARMY

Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology

ARMY

Soldier Applied
Research

ARMY

Soldier Applied
Research

ARMY

Ground Advanced
Technology

Fluids for Electrified
Tactical Vehicles

ARMY

Ground Advanced
Technology

Smart Fuel Metering

ARMY

Future Vertical Lift
Advanced
Technology

Hybrid Propulsion
Technology Demonstrator

Battlefield Electric
Vehicle Recharge
Technology
Energy Storage for
Sustained Operations(ESSO)
Reformed Ethanol Fuel
Cell Catalysts for Small
Unit Power

Project develops FVL engine technologies that could
significantly improve platform performance (range,
speed, payload), durability, and operational
capability
Project develops FVL advanced drive traintechnologies that increase performance and double
current drivetrain life cycles while improving theirreliability and maintainability
Develops power components and control for highpower aviation mission systems.
Project effort will develop and demonstrateintegrated power and thermal management
technologies to provide significantly higher electrical
power capability for FVL aircraft
Research highly mobile electric vehicle rechargers toenable highly electrified tactical and combat
platforms
alternative energy storage to Lithium-ion batteries
and alternatives to storing energy from harvestablesources
Provide the dismounted Soldier with a small,lightweight, compact fuel cell to charge batteries on
the battlefield.
Conduct bench top testing of thermal management
fluids for vehicle electrification to evaluate and downselect fluid candidates.
Mature smart meter design based on baseline
evaluation, add tank level monitoring, and assess
fuel dashboard and data transfer performance.
Demonstrate hybrid-electric aircraft propulsion
technologies.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

03

0603462A

042,544

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

03

0603462A

0

24,770

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2040

03

0603462A

5,215

0Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

03

0603465A

1,720

0Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

03

0603465A

1,404

0Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

03

0603465A

1,915

10,259Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

03

0603465A

1,487

16,809Platform
Upgrades_Land

2040

02

0602145A

0

8,509

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2040

02

0602184A

0

7,100

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2040

02

0602184A

0

9,009

Alternative Fuels
Certification andTesting

2040

030603119A

0

6,891

Enterprise-wide
Energy Visibility

Conventional
Fuels Testing

2040

03

0603119A

0

10,519EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

03

0603465A

00

EnergySubstitution andDiversification
EnergySubstitution andDiversification
EnergySubstitution andDiversification
EnergySubstitution andDiversification

65

ORG
ARMY
ARMY

OE Program Title
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology
Next Generation
Combat Vehicle
Technology

ARMY

UH-60 Black Hawk
M Models

ARMY

UH-60 Black Hawk A
and L Models

ARMY

Chinook ProductImprovement
Program

ARMY

Chinook ProductImprovement
Program

ARMY
ARMY

AH-64 Apache
Attack Helicopter D
Model
AH-64 Apache
Attack Helicopter E
Model

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

Mature extremely high energy density energy storage
for combat vehicles.

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

02

0602145A

0

7,490

High Density In-Sprocket
Drive Applied Technology

Researches components for hybrid-electric trackdrive combat vehicles.

Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

02

0602145A

03,462Black Hawk Aircrew
Simulators

Black Hawk Aircrew Simulators

Enterprise-wide
Energy Visibility

Simulators Air

2031

01

0210101A

6,873

36,444

Black Hawk Aircrew Simulators

Enterprise-wide
Energy Visibility

Simulators Air

2031

01

0210101A

23,18839,743Chinook Transportable Flight Proficiency Simulator(TFPS)

Enterprise-wide
Energy Visibility

Training and
Education

2040

07

0607137A

3,000

0Updates the CH-47F with more powerful engines,
more efficient rotors, simplified fuel system withgreater capacity, more powerful electrical system,
and light weight components for greater payload andrange

Energy Demand
Reduction

Platform
Upgrades_Air

2040

07

0607137A

64,87088,323

AH-64 Apache Attack Helicopter Simulators

Enterprise-wide
Energy Visibility

Simulators Air

2031

01

0210100A00

AH-64 Apache Attack Helicopter Simulators

Enterprise-wide
Energy Visibility

Simulators Air

2031

01

0210100A0

0

Aviation - Improved Turbine Engine Program (ITEP)

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2040

07

0607139A

250,533

737,503

Aviation - Improved Turbine Engine Program (ITEP)

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

2031

01

0216300A0

1,270,957

Powertrain and electrical systems for the M113family replacement: Supports mobility, protection,and mission command, and positions the vehicle for
future upgrades

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2033

01

0211702A

867,020

2,110,273

Early Entry Fluid Distribution System (E2FDS)

Supply Chain
Resilience

Fuel
Infrastructure

2035

03

0216300A

19,98435,904OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

Extreme Energy Density
Energy Storage

Black Hawk Aircrew
Simulators andConcurrency
Chinook Transportable
Flight Proficiency
Simulator (TFPS)
CH-47F Block II rotor,
engine, fuel andelectrical system
upgrades, andlightweighting efforts
AH-64 Apache Attack
Helicopter Simulators
and Concurrency
AH-64 Apache Attack
Helicopter Simulators
Aviation - Improved
Turbine Engine Program(ITEP)
Aviation - Improved
Turbine Engine Program(ITEP)

ARMY

Improved Turbine
EngineARMY

Improved Turbine
EngineARMY

Armored MultiPurpose Vehicle(AMPV)

Armored Multi-Purpose
Vehicle (AMPV)ARMYDistribution
Systems, Petroleum& Water

Early Entry Fluid
Distribution System(E2FDS)

ARMY

Semitrailers andTankers

Bulk Fuel Distribution
System (BFDS)BFDS - Bulk Fuel Distribution System

Supply Chain
Resilience

Fuel
Infrastructure

2035

03

0216300A

17,985

128,692

ARMY

Semitrailers andTankers

Tactical Fuel Distribution
System (TFDS)

Tactical Fuel Distribution System (TFDS)

Supply Chain
Resilience

Fuel
Infrastructure

2035

03

0216300A

0

212,593

ARMY

Water andPetroleum
Distribution - ED

Tactical Fuel Distribution
System (TFDS)

Tactical Fuel Distribution System (TFDS)

Supply Chain
Resilience

Fuel
Infrastructure

2040

05

0604804A

3,856

3,850

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

66

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

ARMY

Modification Of In
Svc Equip

HTV Anti-Idle Retrofit Kit

ARMY

Modification Of In
Svc Equip

MTV/HTV On Board
Vehicle Power (OBVP)

ARMY

Modification Of In
Svc Equip

Fuel Sense 2.0

Water andPetroleum
Distribution - ED
Water andPetroleum
Distribution - ED

Early Entry Fluid
Distribution System(E2FDS)

ARMY

Medium Tactical
VehiclesFMTV Anti-Idle Retrofit
Kit

ARMY

Medium Tactical
VehiclesHTV Anti-Idle Retrofit Kit

ARMYMedium Tactical
VehiclesMTV/HTV On Board
Vehicle Power (OBVP)

ARMYMedium Tactical
VehiclesMTV/HTV Advanced /Hybrid Propulsion with
OBVP

ARMY

Medium Tactical
VehiclesFuel Sense 2.0

ARMY

Medium Tactical
Vehicles

ARMY

Joint Light Tactical
VehicleARMY

Joint Light Tactical
VehicleARMY

Joint Light Tactical
Vehicle

ARMY
ARMY

Bulk Fuel Distribution
System (BFDS)

Commercial Class 8
Electrification Study /Line Haul
Electrical System Energy
Related Improvements Engine UpgradeElectrical System Energy
Related Improvements Alternator and Li Battery
Anti-Idle Kits (TVEK)(Procurement Effort)

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2035

01

0216300A

085,190

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2035

01

0216300A0

100,000

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2035

01

0216300A0

7,500

Early Entry Fluid Distribution System (E2FDS)

Supply Chain
Resilience

Fuel
Infrastructure

2040

05

0604804A

318

359

BFDS - Bulk Fuel Distribution System

Supply Chain
Resilience

Fuel
Infrastructure

2040

05

0604804A

515

1,559

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

05

0604604A

0

2,000

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

05

0604604A

0

34,250

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

2040

05

0604604A

0

14,250

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

05

0604604A

0

6,000

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

05

0604604A

0

550

Commercial Class 8 Electrification Study / Line Haul

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

05

0604604A

0450

Electrical System Energy Related Improvements Engine Upgrade

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2035

01

0216300A

0

506,585

Electrical System Energy Related Improvements Alternator and Li Battery

Energy Demand
Reduction

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2035

01

0216300A

047,314Anti-idle kit for legacy JLTVs to reduce overall fuelconsumption up to 20% (duty cycle dependent)(Production Kits)

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2035

01

0216300A

0

123,101

OE Project Description
Anti-idle retrofit kit, ECP for existing HTV platforms(HEMTT, PLS, HET, M915A5) that enables HVAC
operation and onboard comms / accessories to run
on battery power for 1-4 hrs with the engine off.
A highly mobile, lightweight fast-forming vehicle
hybrid power system with AC / DC microgrid
capability – ECP for MTV/HTV platforms.
Transmission software upgrade / ECP on existing
platforms designed to improve electronic shift
strategy for Allison 5th and 6th generation tactical
vehicle transmission assemblies.

Anti-idle retrofit kit, ECP for the FMTV that enables
HVAC operation and onboard comms / accessories
to run on battery power for 1-4 hrs with the engine off.
Anti-idle retrofit kit, ECP for existing HTV platforms(HEMTT, PLS, HET, M915A5) that enables HVAC
operation and onboard comms / accessories to run
on battery power for 1-4 hrs with the engine off.
A highly mobile, lightweight fast-forming vehicle
hybrid power system with AC / DC microgrid
capability – ECP for MTV/HTV platforms.
By adding a specialized clutch, 200kW Inverter, andLi-ion battery pack, can turn the Transmission
Integral Generator into an electric motor.
Transmission software upgrade / ECP on existing
platforms designed to improve electronic shift
strategy for Allison 5th and 6th generation tactical
vehicle transmission assemblies.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

Energy Demand
Reduction67

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

Modeling efforts to optimize the hybrid and fullelectric propulsion systems

Energy Demand
Reduction

Anti-idle kit for legacy JLTVs to reduce overall fuelconsumption up to 20% (duty cycle dependent) (A1)ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

ARMY

Joint Light Tactical
VehicleHybrid and Electric
System Modeling

ARMY

Joint Light Tactical
VehicleAnti-Idle Kits (TVEK)(RDTE Development
Engineering Effort)

ARMY

Generators andAssociatedEquipment

Advanced Medium
Mobile Power Source

ARMY

Generators andAssociatedEquipment

Power Distribution
Illumination Systems
Electrical (PDISE)ARMYLOGISTICS AND
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENTENGINEERING DEVPower Distribution
Illumination Systems
Electrical (PDISE)
Expansion

Advanced Medium Mobile Power Sources (AMMPS)
units power or are incorporated into digital systems
across the Army Portfolio to include Network/C3I, Air& Missile Defense, Long Range Precision Fires,
Command Post and Combat Support/Combat
Service Support Systems. AMMPS is a modernization
program to provide 5kW, 10kW, 15kW, 30kW, or
60kW generators in either a skid, trailer mounted, or
microgrid configuration to replace legacy generatorsand provide an ability to interface with newer
technologies. AMMPS enhances operational
effectiveness by increasing availability of power,
while reducing noise, weight, and sustainment
burdens for units. AMMPS Microgrid Configurations
meet power needs while reducing the fuelconsumption on the battlefield. The reduced logistics
footprint significantly reduces the cost of operation.
Power Distribution Illumination Systems Electrical(PDISE) provides the linkage between the generatorsand the Network/C3I, Air & Missile Defense, Long
Range Precision Fires, Command Post and Combat
Support/Combat Service Support systems. Power
distribution systems are the circuit breaker panel forcommunication and electronic systems. This programtransmits electrical power efficiently from the point ofgeneration to the point of need. PDISE components
are man-portable and safe for all-weather operations
to protect Soldiers from electric shock. PDISE is areliable, quick to assemble, modular designed power
distribution equipment that is critical to deploying
power networks. PDISE is compatible with DoD
generator sets from 5kW to 60kW. PDISE as aprogram is committed solely to the warfighter.
Medium Power Distribution Systems (MPDS) provides
the linkage between the 5-60kW generators andincludes the current PDISE family, M200, M100,
M40, M60, M46 and the multiple input microgrid
feeder box.
Prepare PDISE- Prime effort by awarding the PrimePower Distribution System (PPDS) contract,developing Prime Power Connection Kit (PPCK) firstarticle units and start developmental testing inclusive

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

05

0605812A

655

0Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

05

0605812A

543

14,560

Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2035

030216300A

100,228

403,870

Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2035

030216300A

4,338

24,785

Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2040

050604804A

1,315

4,000

68

ORG

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

ARMY

OE Program Title

Generators andAssociatedEquipment
LOGISTICS AND
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENTENGINEERING DEVLOGISTICS AND
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENTENGINEERING DEVLOGISTICS AND
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENTENGINEERING DEVLOGISTICS AND
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENTENGINEERING DEVOE Initiative Title

Small Tactical ElectricPower (STEP)

STEP

Integrated Fire Control
Network (IFCN) Relay

OE Project Descriptionof the Improved Primary Switching Center (iPSC) andImproved Secondary Distribution Center (iSDC) The
PPCK enables distribution of power from prime powersources which use medium voltages or higher. The
system will transform medium or higher voltages
down to standard 120/208 V, 3-phase power.
Elements of the PPCK will enhance the existing
Secondary Distribution Center (SDC) by incorporating
advanced capabilities to accept either 4160 Volts
Alternating Current (VAC) primary input power from a
USA Deployable Power Generation and Distribution
System (DPGDS) or a United States Air Force (USAF)
Basic Expeditionary Airfield Resources (BEAR) powersource or 13,800 VAC from contracted andcommercial power sources or host nation/existing
distribution systems.
STEP is a modernization program that will provide afamily of systems of improved tactical electric mobile
power sources for replacement of the currently
fielded 2kW MTG and 3kW TQG.
RDTE investment in STEP will further improve mobile
Tactical Electric Power by providing lightweight,
modular, reliable and more logistically supportable
power sources.
The effort will develop and integrate an advanced
hybrid power solution for the AMMPS generators toinitially support operation of the Integrated Fire
Control Network (IFCN) Relay.

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2035

030216300A

1,554

41,787

Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2040

050604804A

7,593

42,608EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Contingency
Basing2040

050604804A

370

2,115

Field Hospital Microgrid
Systems

RDTE investment in Field Hospital Microgrid Systems
will support medical operations in large scale combat
operations.

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Contingency
Basing2040

050604804A0

1,500

Lightweight Portable
Power

RDTE investment into Lightweight Portable Powersupports the prototyping and test and evaluation oflightweight power systems in the 2-5kW range.

Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2040

050604804A

0

10,000

Supply Chain
Resilience

Contingency
Basing2035

030211700A

0

20,251

Supply Chain
Resilience

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2040

05

0604827A

08,220

Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2035

030216300A

38,86046,200

ARMY

Mobile Soldier
Power

Platoon Power Generator
(PPG)

ARMY

Soldier Systems Warrior Dem/Val

Platoon Power Generator
(PPG)

ARMY

Force Provider

Force Provider (FP)PPG provides small units with portable power. It
reduces dependency on disposable batteries and theneed for operational energy resupply for long
duration missions.
RDTE investment in PPG will further reduce thelogistical burden associated with fuel and primary(disposable) batteries.
The FPE 150 person module is 30-50% more energy
efficient than the equivalent legacy FP (Rev B)
module.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

69

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Strategy
Objectives

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

Contingency
Basing2035

030216300A

6,116

37,557

Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2040

050604804A

06,265

Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2040

050604804A

1,368

10,131

Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2040

050604804A

3,824

0Energy Demand
Reduction

Contingency
Basing2040

040603804A

4,000

15,000

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2035

01

0216300A

085,190OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

Energy Demand
Reduction

OE Activity
Classification

ARMY

Heaters and ECU's

Improved Environmental
Control Unit (IECU)

ARMY

LOGISTICS AND
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENTENGINEERING DEVFamily of IECUs (4 variants) are 20-30% more energy
efficient than legacy ECUs. More energy efficient
ECUs decrease electrical power needed to cool
mission platforms, command posts and bases; and,thus, reduce overall operational energy usage.

Improved Environmental
Control Unit (IECU)

RDTE investment in family of IECU will further improveenergy efficiency and enable compatibility with moreenvironmentally friendly refrigerants.

ARMY

LOGISTICS AND
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENTENGINEERING DEV

Army Standard FamilyRigid Wall Shelters (ASFRWS)

ARMY

Logistics andEngineer Equipment- Eng Dev

194 / Engine Driven Gen
Ed

ARMY

LOGISTICS AND
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENT- ADV
DEVAdv Elec Energy Con Ad/
G11

ARMY

Modification Of In
Svc Equip

FMTV Anti-Idle Retrofit
Kit

ARMY

Integrated SoldierPower Data System Core

Small Unit Tactical Power(ISPDS-C)

ISPDS-C RDTE

Supply Chain
Resilience

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2040

05

0604827A

4,165

31,316

ARMY

Universal Battery
Charger

Small Unit Tactical Power(ISPDS-C)UBC RDTE

Supply Chain
Resilience

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2040

05

0604827A

951

5,053

ASF-RWS shelters have 20-40% better system-levelinsulating capability (heat transfer coefficient) thanapplicable legacy shelters. This improvement ininsulating capability results in a significant reduction(25-30%) in environmental control energy
consumption and, thus, overall operational energy
usage.
Large Tactical Power System (LTPS) is amodernization program for existing legacy large
power generation systems that will provide mobile,
durable and reliable tactical electric power
capabilities above 60kW, to support Multi Domain
Operations in the austere environments of today's
battlefield.
RDTE investment supports the modernization of thecurrent Tactical Electric Power capability withtechnology insertions including, but not limited tohybrid capabilities, light-weight
power solutions, vehicle/tactical microgrid
interoperability and Tactical Microgrid Standards(TMS). Funding also supports developing initial
prototypes to enablerefinement of Operational Requirements and earlyuser feedback to support future sustainment an
operational energy concepts. Congressionallyprovided funds will
support analysis and planning for potential transition
to the Army of the mobile micro-reactor prototype
and capability.
Anti-idle retrofit kit, ECP for the FMTV that enables
HVAC operation and onboard comms / accessories
to run on battery power for 1-4 hrs with the engine off.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2270

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

ISPDS-C OPA

Supply Chain
Resilience

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2035

03

0211700A

5,947

34,294

Universal Battery Charger

UBC OPASupply Chain
Resilience

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2035

03

0211700A

11,86841,262Ground Soldier
SystemSmall Unit Tactical Power(Nett Warrior)

Nett Warrior CWB+Next Gen HUB OPA

Supply Chain
Resilience

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

2035

03

0211700A

23,70994,211

ARMY

Bradley Program(MOD)

Improved Bradley

Increases mobility with extended life track, andimproved shocks, road arms and torsion bars

Energy Demand
Reduction

Platform
Upgrades_Land

2033

01

0211702A

75,2580

ARMY

Bradley Program(MOD)

Improved BradleyMore efficient Bradley - The Bradley improved engine
and transmission generate an overall fuel reductionof 3%

Energy Demand
Reduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2033

01

0211702A

25,847

12,070

ARMY

Inland Petroleum
Distribution System

Fuel Infrastructure

IPDS Fuel Unit COSIS

Supply Chain
Resilience

Fuel
Infrastructure

2020

02

0208031A

12,68180,011ARMY

800k Fuel System
Supply Point

Fuel Infrastructure

800k FSSP COSIS

Supply Chain
Resilience

Fuel
Infrastructure

2020

02

0208031A

442

2,731

ARMY

HMMWV HybridElectric Vehicle(HEV)

HMMWV Hybrid Electric
Vehicle (HEV) Christina
MorrisEnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

05

0604642A

0

181,203

ARMY

JLTV Hybrid Electric
Vehicle (HEV)JLTV Hybrid Electric
Vehicle (HEV) Mark
Hildebrand

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

05

0605812A

0

124,000

ARMY

Electric Light
Reconnaissance
Vehicleelectric Light
Reconnaissance Vehicle
Christina Morris

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2040

05

0604642A

027,616ARMY

HMMWV HybridElectric Vehicle(HEV)

HMMWV Hybrid Electric
Vehicle (HEV) Michelle
Marku

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2035

01

0216300A

078,365ARMY

JLTV Hybrid Electric
Vehicle (HEV)JLTV Hybrid Electric
Vehicle (HEV) Lauren
Mento

EnergySubstitution andDiversification

Propulsion
Upgrades_Land

2035

01

0216300A

0

0

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

ARMY

Mobile Soldier
Power

Integrated Soldier Power
Data System - Core(ISPDS-C)

ARMY

Mobile Soldier
Power

ARMY

HMMWV Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) prototypes
aimed to improve and provide new capabilities suchas fuel demand reductions, reduced greenhouse gas
emissions, increased automotive performance.
JLTV Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) prototypes aimed
to improve and provide new capabilities such as fueldemand reductions, reduced greenhouse gas
emissions, increased automotive performance.
The electric Light Reconnaissance Vehicle (eLRV)
platform through electrification will provide
commanders a substantial competitive advantage in
the Multi-Domain Operational (MDO) Environment
against threat capabilities through reduction inacoustic and thermal signature, silent mobility,
increased dash speed, extended range, increased
reliability and reduction in Class (CL) III
requirements. These attributes will enhance lethality
and survivability of the mounted reconnaissancesquad, platoon and troop.
HMMWV Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) production
aimed to improve and provide new capabilities suchas fuel demand reductions, reduced greenhouse gas
emissions, increased automotive performance.
JLTV Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) production aimed
to improve and provide new capabilities such as fueldemand reductions, reduced greenhouse gas
emissions, increased automotive performance.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

71

ORG

ARMY

ORG
NAVY

OE Program Title

Combat Service
Support Equipment

OE Program Title
DEFENSERESEARCHSCIENCESOE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

Tactical Electric Power
Recapitalization

The Deployable Power Generation and Distribution
System (DPGDS) Power Unit (PU) provides mission
critical power to the Nation's strategic missile
defense assets; specifically the Army/Navy
Transportable Radar Surveillance (AN/TPY-2) X-Band
Radar in Forward-Based Mode (FBM). These radars
are critical in detecting, classifying and tracking
ballistic missiles. The power unit is also used by the
Army's only Prime Power Battalion to support its
National Response Framework (NRF) mission,
providing DoD support to civil defense and climate
related disasters. The recapitalization effort
leverages significant technology advancements overpast 15 years and extends the economic useful life ofthese PUs by bringing the set back to zero hours andreduces emissions with a newer EPA Tier engine. The
recapitalized MEP-PU-810 will come in two variants,
the MEP-PU-810C, a towed trailer configuration,
which will replace the legacy MEP-PU-810A modeland the MEP-PU-810D, a 5th wheel configuration
DoT approved for over the road use at 55 mph, which
will replace the legacy MEP-PU-810B model.
Throughout the Department of Defense there are 165'A' Models and 66 'B' Models supporting numerous
missions, such as supporting the nation's Ballistic
Missile Defense System. Capabilities:
Once fielded, the MEP-PU-810C/D Power Unit (PU)will be at the center of the Army's Deployable Power
Generation and Distribution System (DPGDS).
Portable, multi-fuel engine driven generator rated toprovide 800kW of electrical power at 4160 Volts
Alternating Current (VAC) and provides the transition
from tactical electric power to Shore/Host Nation
power. Completely self-contained, integrated trailer.
Capable of operating standalone or in a multi-unit
Microgrid configuration equipped with modern, builtin controls & its own electrical distribution bus, High
Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) hardened.

OE Strategy
Objectives

Supply Chain
Resilience

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

OE Strategy
Objectives

Bioengineering and Life
Sciences (Energy)

Basic research exploring biofabrication for generationof inorganic energy harvesting/conversion materials;
bacterial-inorganic hybrid materials for fuel cells;

EnergySubstitution

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Activity
Classification

Contingency
BasingTreasuryCode

BA Code2035

03

OE Activity
Classification
Materials andDesignTreasuryCode

BA Code

1319

01

72

ProgramElement

FY2022($K)

FYDP ($K)

0216300A

10,50045,128

Army Total

1,715,754

7,896,833

ProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

0601153N

400

1,677

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

NAVY

DEFENSERESEARCHSCIENCES

Bioengineering and Life
Sciences (Energy)

NAVY

OPLOG IPT
Development

Seabased Petroleum
Distribution System(SPDS)

NAVY

Advance Surface
Machinery Sys

Integrated Power &Energy Systems

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Advanced Batteries
Supply Change

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Advanced Batteries R&D

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Advance Batteries
Jumpstart Program

NAVY

ADVANCED
SURFACEMACHINERYSYSTEMS

Shipboard Energy
Storage

NAVY

Unmanned
Undersea Vehicle(UUV) CoreTechnologies

Li-Ion Battery:
Propagation ResistantArchitecture

NAVY

Unmanned
Undersea Vehicle(UUV) CoreTechnologies

Warehousing: Robotic
Cell Screening

OE Project Description
nano-biomaterials for generating high intensity lightsources; silk composites for energy harvesting andenergy sources; and novel humidity responsive
materials for harnessing energy for naturalevaporation.
Basic research exploring the fundamental mechanismof bacterial spores' water-responsive behaviors inorder to develop practical applications using theevaporation energy harvesting technique, and next
generation actuators.
Development of an offshore bulk fuel cache storageand over the shore transfer system. Replaces andimproves on legacy OPDS systems.
Development of Next Generation Integrated Power andEnergy System (NGIPES) technology aboard Navy Ships
to enable current and future weapons and sensor
systems.
Assessments and integration of defense-wide
advanced batteries R&D. [PDM II: Defense Advanced
Battery Supply Chain]
Battery Development and Safety R&D. [FY24 PDM I:
FUND RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION AND
STORAGE]Coordination of advance batteries R&D withcommercial industry, including the automotive
industry, to expedite safe fielding of advanced
batteries on defense systems. [FY24 PDM I: Jumpstart
Program]
Large format lithium ion batteries. [FY23 Cong.
Program Increase, C873]
Project is focused on the development of a
propagation resistant battery architecture including
integration and demonstration in a medium sized UUV.
Effort also includes modeling and simulation
capabilities geared toward predicting the propagation
resistance of a battery architecture.
Development of a robust screening process geared
toward discarding battery cell outliers that show signsof internal shorting early in the battery assembly
process. The discarded outliers will have the effect ofincreasing both system reliability and safety byeliminating poorer performing cells and cells with signsof internal shorts. This will also have the effect of
reducing the probability of a future latent cell defectand catastrophic battery system failures for UUVs.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

and
Diversification

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Alternative Power
Sources1319

01

0601153N

557

2,676

Supply Chain
Resilience

Fuel Infrastructure

1319

04

0603564N

10,90021,306

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603573N

52,134

265,833

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

015,400

Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

07,000

Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

0

4,000

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603573N

09,000

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0604029N

8,141

41,710

Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0604029N

6,550

33,210

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification
EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

73

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

NAVY

FACILITIES NEW
FOOTPRINT - RDT&E

High Energy Test andAbuse Facility

NAVY

DEFENSERESEARCHSCIENCES

Naval Power Materials
Research

NAVY

DEFENSERESEARCHSCIENCES

Naval Biosciences Microbial Fuel Cells

NAVY

DEFENSERESEARCHSCIENCES

Naval Power Systems

NAVY

DEFENSERESEARCHSCIENCES

Sea Based Aviation
Propulsion Basic
Research

NAVY

DEFENSERESEARCHSCIENCES

Naval Platform
Operational Endurance &OE Project Description
Program will establish a Quality Assurance protocol
and procedure for quality control oversight anddocumentation of battery assembly and configuration
control.
Construction of High Energy Test and Abuse Facility foradvance batteries testing [FY23 PDM II: Defense
Advanced Battery Supply Chain AND FY24 PDM I:
Battery Testing Infrastructure]]
Energy storage and power generation materials basic
research
Microbial fuel cells (MFC) provide electricity harvested
from specialized natural bacteria that use nonhazardous organic compounds as fuel, and thenprovide electrical current to an electrode. Can be used
to sustainably power seafloor sensors/systems inplace of batteries. Program focuses on study offundamental mechanisms used for extracellularelectron transport.
Advancing power and energy science throughfundamental research in the areas of conductor andpermanent magnet materials, energy conversion,
combustion, and cyber physical system modeling.
Advancing thermal science and technology throughfundamental studies of multi-phase heat transfer, fluid
dynamics, and nanostructured materials to efficiently
acquire, transport, and reject heat and enable higher
power density electronic systems. Fulfill the power andenergy needs of the Navy’s next-generation weapons
and platforms by improving (1) Education, (2)Reliability of power electronic devices, (3) Powerdensity of power systems, and (4) Power Electronics
Manufacturing costs.
This Program provides long-term basic research that
discovers new phenomena related power propulsion
and thermal management, with the intent that theymature to provide transition opportunities for the
associated applied research program. This Program
also supports university research in these areas andthe associated graduate student support to help build
the number and quality of Scientists and Engineers
with relevant skills to help further develop power andpropulsion systems for future Sea Based Aviation
platforms and weapon systems.
Advancing research in novel materials and processes
to reduce fossil fuel use and decrease emissions.
Developing design tools to: explicitly target climate

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1205

01

0816376N

071,700

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Materials andDesign1319

01

0601153N

8,880

27,492

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Alternative Power
Sources1319

01

0601153N

1,407

2,436

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

01

0601153N

7,439

46,311

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

1319

01

0601153N

2,222

14,147

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

01

0601153N

1,000

4,591

74

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title
Climate Resiliency
Science

NAVY

DEFENSERESEARCHSCIENCESOE Project Description
resilience to increase awareness of carbon footprint, or
GHG emissions from platforms, fleets, etc.; provide thecapacity for predicting emissions from platforms,
including unmanned platforms for power architecture
design, performance, and performance prediction (toinclude emissions).

ONRG International
Research

Basic research with international principle
investigators doing collaborative and cooperative
research with the Naval research enterprise.

NAVY

DEFENSERESEARCHSCIENCES

NRL - Energy

Long term Basic research into phenomena andmechanisms allowing for more efficient conversion of
power; generation of power from solar illumination;from hydrogen conversion in fuel cells; storage ofenergy in improved battery technologies; augmentationof liquid fuels for greater energy density andexploitation of biological mechanisms for longduration energy sources.

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Navy Flightline
Electrification

Navy Flightline Electrification pilot for 2 sites. [FY24
PDM I: Support Equipment Electrification]

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Sea Based Aviation
Propulsion Applied
Research

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Naval Power Systems

This Program provides medium-term, applied research
to demonstrate advanced engine technologies
applicable to engine components for naval aviation
platforms in propulsion-related technology areas. The
specific areas addressed in this program are: (1)
Propulsion Cycles, Subsystems, and Engine-Airframe
Integration (2) High Stage-Loading, VariableGeometry, and Enhanced Durability Turbomachinery(3) Jet Noise Reduction for tactical aircraft (4) Hot
Section Materials and Coatings, (5) Higher PowerDensity and Stability Combustion Systems, and (6)Small Propulsion Engine Technology for Autonomous
Air Vehicles.
Technology programs focused on providing
technologically superior warfighting capabilities at
reduced total ownership costs for surface andsubsurface platforms through investments in appliedresearch of programs such as the Electric Ship
Research and Development Consortium (ESRDC),
which is composed of eight leading universities and is
focused on afloat power systems, and leads efforts toaddress a national shortage of electric powerengineers, and ensure U.S. superiority in electric
systems; activities linked with newly established
Combat Power and Energy Systems (CPES);.andactivities in support of digital twin, heat

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Alternative Power
Sources1319

01

0601153N

199

921

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

01

0601153N

6,249

34,074

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

02

0602123N

08,750

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

1319

02

0602123N

3,676

18,244

Supply Chain
Resilience

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

02

0602123N

0

800

75

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Naval Platform
Operational Endurance &Climate Resiliency
Science

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Naval Power Systems

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Propulsion Task Force
Energy (TFE)NAVY

WARFIGHTERSUSTAINMENTAPPLIED RESEARCH

Biocentric Technology(Energy)NAVY

WARFIGHTERSUSTAINMENTAPPLIED RESEARCH

Microgrid Resilience

OE Project Description
transfer/thermal management, distribution/control ofpower and energy storage and power management.
[FY23 PDM II - Climate DDGX IPS]
Advancing design tools focused on climate resilienceand predicting emissions from platforms. Purue
technology development efforts addressed to impact
climate remediation, including evaluation of Low
Global Warming Potential (GWP) refrigerants, Subsea& Seabed Warfare (SSW) Energy Harvesting and Direct
Air Capture & Blue Carbon fuel synthesis.
This effort received funding via PBIS Issue 50402:"PDM I Climate - Green Tech carbon sequestration andcapture FY24," $7M/year 23-27.
Technology programs focused on providing
technologically superior warfighting capabilities at
reduced total ownership costs for surface andsubsurface platforms through investments in appliedresearch of programs such as the Electric Ship
Research and Development Consortium (ESRDC),
which is composed of eight leading universities and is
focused on afloat power systems, and leads efforts toaddress a national shortage of electric powerengineers, and ensure U.S. superiority in electric
systems; activities linked with newly established
Combat Power and Energy Systems (CPES); andactivities in support of digital twin, heattransfer/thermal management, distribution/control ofpower, energy storage and power management, andair-independent power and energy technology.
This Program, in partnership with the Variable Cycle
Advance Technology (VCAT) program, has the objective
to develop variable geometry and adaptive cycle gas
turbine engine technology for next generation air
dominance aircraft. The benefits of these technologies
are anticipated to be reduced fuel consumption andhence greater operational range and reduced logistics
tail, mostly by reducing the demand for deployed fueland tanker aircraft support.
Program focuses on microbes that produce electricity
from organic matter found in sediment or wastewater,
and is targeting two distinct naval applications: (1)Powering of undersea devices and sensors forenvironmental monitoring, and (2)shipboard/submarine wastewater degradation
Microgrid Resilience Demos for Microgrid Resilienceon Naval Installations by Adoption of Shipboard Zonal
Distribution - HIL and Pilot Hardware Demos [FY24
PDM I: Grid Vulnerability and On-Base Power]

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

02

0602123N

2,800

51,903

Supply Chain
Resilience

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

02

0602123N

28,471

132,774

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

1319

02

0602123N

8,685

44,307

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Alternative Power
Sources1319

020602236N

685

3,190

Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

02

0602236N

0

1,500

76

ORG
NAVY
NAVY

NAVY

OE Program Title
WARFIGHTERSUSTAINMENTAPPLIED RESEARCHWARFIGHTERSUSTAINMENTAPPLIED RESEARCHOCEANWARFIGHTINGENVIRONMENTAPPLIED RESEARCHOE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

ONRG International
Research

Early applied research with international principle
investigators doing collaborative and cooperative
research with the Naval research enterprise.

Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Alternative Power
Sources1319

020602236N

150

760

Water Data Collection

Water Resiliency tool updates, studies, and pilots.
[FY24 PDM I: Water Resilience]

Supply Chain
Resilience

Contingency
Basing1319

020602236N

08,800

Refueling & Support
Package to Enable
Comms and Situational
Awareness (RASP CASA0

Hydrogen production development system to support
unmanned systems fueled on and off ships. [FY24 PDM
I: Ground Vehicles and Fuels]

Supply Chain
Resilience

Alternative Fuels
Production

1319

02

0602435N

02,700

Supply Chain
Resilience

Current
Operations Tools

1319

02

0602435N

3,643

21,930Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

M&S, Studies,and Wargames

1319

02

0602435N

0350

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Sea

1319

02

0602747N

1,200

3,121

EnergyDemandReduction

Alternative Power
Sources1319

020602747N

0

10,168Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

03

0603123N

046,182NAVY

OCEAN
WARFIGHTINGENVIRONMENTAPPLIED RESEARCH

Integrated Climate
Weather and Ocean
Decision Support

NAVY

OCEAN
WARFIGHTINGENVIRONMENTAPPLIED RESEARCH

iPowerNAVY

UNDERSEAWARFARE APPLIEDRESEARCH

Naval Power Undersea
Weaponry (USW)NAVY

UNDERSEAWARFARE APPLIEDRESEARCH

NRL - Energy

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONADVANCEDTECHNOLOGY

Ship Energy Storage

Long term Applied Research on improved integration of
weather and ocean forecasts into ship routing, ship
response and propulsion efficiency planning, andRefueling at Sea logistics planning, as well as
prediction of hazardous and extreme weather eventsand trends for climate adaptation, resiliency, andmitigation. [FY22 PDM III--Climate Science andTechnology Addition]
iPOWER power & energy simulation application andmake it a CAC-protected cloud service accessible tousers across the Marine Corps and Navy. [FY24 PDM I:
Energy Efficiency Software]
Applied research to develop component, subsystemand system technologies that are the critical building
blocks for advanced high-energy-density and powerdensity propulsion systems, enabling increased
endurance (days/weeks/months) and reliability in an
air-independent environment. Approaches include
modeling and simulation, fuel cells, engines, novel
fuels/oxidizers and reactant storage/delivery systems.
Long term Basic and Applied research into phenomena
and mechanisms allowing for more efficient conversionof power; generation of power from solar illumination;from hydrogen conversion in fuel cells; storage ofenergy in improved battery technologies; augmentationof liquid fuels for greater energy density andexploitation of biological mechanisms for longduration energy sources.
Energy Magazine integrates with the ship's existing
power system and eliminates the need for mission
systems to each develop, build, and test their own
unique energy storage systems, and supports zonal orwhole ship UPS functionality. Project Includes (HESMPEBB) Hybrid Energy Storage Module PowerElectronics Building Block Active Rectifier for DEW/EW
operations. [FY24 PDM I: Aircraft and Ship
Efficiencies]

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

77

ORG

NAVY

NAVY

NAVY

NAVY

OE Program Title
SHIP PRELIMINARYDESIGN &FEASIBILITYSTUDIESSHIP PRELIMINARYDESIGN &FEASIBILITYSTUDIES
FUTURE NAVALCAPABILITIESADVANCED TECHDEV
NAVY ENERGYPROGRAMOE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

T-AKE Propeller Duct

Hydrodynamic analysis to include CFD and tow tanktesting for the validation of the propeller duct for the TAKE class. OPLOG IPT Development. [FY24 PDM I:
Aircraft and Ship Efficiencies]

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603564N

0250

Seabased Petroleum
Distribution System(SPDS)Development of an offshore bulk fuel cache storageand over the shore transfer system. Replaces andimproves on legacy OPDS systems. OPLOG IPT.

Supply Chain
Resilience

Mobile Fuel
Distribution
Assets1319

040603564N

6,720

0Robust Combat Power
Control (RCPC)

Develop Combat Power and Energy Control System toanticipate, align and configure shipboard resources
based on system state and mission context.

Supply Chain
Resilience

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

03

0603673N

7,735

6,347

DDG-51 Class Global
Energy Information
System (GENISYS)

Development of the Global Energy Information System(GENISYS) for DDG-51 Class ships.

Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Metering andMonitoring

1319

04

0603724N

07,131EnergyDemandReduction

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

02,590

Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603724N

06,750

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603724N

0575

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603724N

015,330Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Metering andMonitoring

1319

04

0603724N

0200

Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Metering andMonitoring

1319

04

0603724N

0

1,700

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAMPower Generation andStorage - PA6B
Electronic Fuel Injection

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Propulsion Systems LM2500 Variable Stator
Vane Optimization

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Propulsion Systems LM2500 Compressor
Blade Polishing

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Ships Efficiency

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Hydrogen Sensing forBatteries

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

DDG-51 Emissions
Monitoring

Electronic Fuel Injection Upgrade for the Fairbanks
Morse (FM) PA6B Diesel Engine. Upgrading the fueldelivery system to electronic fuel injection will improvefuel efficiency of the engine, reduces emissions andvisible smoke, and reduce maintenance man hours
and costs. [FY23 PDM II - Climate DDGX IPS PDM
Load Sheet]
Test and analyze the fuel consumption impacts ofvarying the stator vane angles on the LM2500 Marine
Gas Turbine. The SFC benefit at multiple part power
steady state conditions will be documented along withany risks or issues to equipment reliability. [FY23 PDM
II - Climate DDGX IPS PDM Load Sheet]
Empirical testing of an LM2500 marine gas turbine todefine the fuel efficiency benefit of using polishedcompressor airfoils and tip lengthened compressor
blades during the overhaul of these engines. [FY23
PDM II - Climate DDGX IPS PDM Load Sheet]
Ship efficiency projects including shipboard thermal
management prototype, nonintrusive load monitoring,commercial maritime technology tests, and training
and education. [FY24 PDM I: Aircraft and Ship
Efficiencies]
Identify, procure, test, and qualify hydrogen sensors foruse in submarine and surface ship applications. [FY24
PDM I: Ground Vehicles and Fuels]
Pilot project to conduct real-time monitoring of GHG
emissions from a DDG-51 to optimize engine
performance. [FY24 PDM I: Energy Efficiency
Software]Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

78

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAMEnterprise-Wide Energy
Visibility

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Energy Monitoring,
Planning & Assessment

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Future Combatant Hull
Form Design

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAMPower Generation andStorage

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Hull Husbandry

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Hull Hydrodynamics

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

HVAC

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Thermal Management

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Propulsion Systems

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAMElectrical Systems

OE Project Description
Integration of energy data, refuel command & control,
optimization systems, and force modeling capabilities
to establish a theater energy model and perform
energy supportability assessments to support real-timeenergy command & control, and acquisition decision
making. [FY24 PDM I: Aircraft and Ship Efficiencies]
Capturing and displaying energy related data to
shipboard personnel and navy engineers and planners
as actionable information to employ energy
conservation measures underway and in port as
mission requirements permit. [FY22 PDM IIIOperational Energy LOE 3 Add - Ship Mods]
R&D to model/inform nominal hull form to reduce
resistance for future surface combatants. [FY24 PDM
I: Aircraft and Ship Efficiencies]
This project area accomplishes development,laboratory and Fleet testing to determine overall
mission and cost effectiveness of improved power
generation and storage technologies.
This project is utilized to identify and evaluate newunderwater hull coating systems and underwater hullcleaning and maintenance techniques to reducehydrodynamic drag on the hull and thereby increase
fuel efficiency.
This project area accomplishes development,
modeling, laboratory and Fleet testing of ship
modifications to propellers such as fouling releasecoatings and/or hull appendages to determine overall
mission and cost effectiveness of these improvements.
This project will be utilized to accomplish prototype
development, land and shipboard testing to determine
cost effectiveness of improvements aimed at more
efficient climate control of shipboard spaces.
This project will be utilized to identify and evaluate
potential uses for Thermal Management techniquesdesigned to reduce or dissipate overall shipboard heatgeneration and reduce the shipboard electricaldemand on HVAC systems.
This project is utilized to identify requirements andperform land based and shipboard testing of ship
propulsion system improvements on Gas Turbine,
Steam, and Diesel Engine systems to reduce overall
fuel consumption and lower maintenance costs.
This project area is utilized to identify and perform land
based and shipboard testing of ship electrical system
improvements to reduce energy consumption.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

ProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

040603724N

0

12,000Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

1319

04

0603724N

3,400

0Materials andDesign1319

040603724N

03,100

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

2,286

2,830.257

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603724N

752

1,805.094

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603724N

662

3,842.53

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603724N

845

2,464.451

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform ThermalManagement

1319

04

0603724N

445

2,400.733

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603724N

245

2,024.163

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603724N

712

3,422.12

EnergyDemandReduction
EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeM&S, Studies,and Wargames

1319

Metering andMonitoring

79

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Auxiliary Systems

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Energy Monitoring,
Planning & Assessment

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Mobility Fuels - Fuel
Hardware Impact
analysis

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy - C-130
Finlets

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy - Aerial
Refueling Drogue
Stabilization

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy - Aircraft
Engine Foam Wash

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy - Engine
Blade Scanning andCoating development

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy - Fleet
Drag and Flight Planning
improvements

Mobility Fuels - Deployed
Sensor Development andValidation
Mobility Fuels - Rapid
fuel analysis and impact
assessment

OE Project Description
This project area is utilized to identify, test andevaluate new technologies for shipboard auxiliary
systems aimed at reducing fuel consumption.
This project area focuses on methods of capturing anddisplaying energy related data to shipboard personnel
and navy engineers and planners as actionable
information to employ energy conservation measures
underway and in port as mission requirements permit.
Develop and validate technology to reduce time andresources necessary to provide fuel quality surveillancein forward deployed environments
Develop test methods, fuel-hardware interaction
correlations and analytic tools to reduce operational
impacts from field identified deficiencies
Conduct RDTE necessary to allow operational and/or
technical decision makers the ability to assess risk offuel properties/chemistry on current and emerging
operational or platform requirements
Develop, demonstrate, test and analyze an optimized
finlet design to reduce drag on Navy and USMC C-130,
and then retrofit to fleet aircraft. Benefits will be lower
fuel consumption for a mission or increase in Range orTime on Station metrics. [Part of FY23 PDM II - Climate- Aircraft Efficiency Retrofits]
Develop, design and demonstrate Aerial Refueling
Drogue Stabilization technology to reduce refuelingdrogue captures. Benefit is reducing fuel used by fleet
during refueling operations that can be used for
mission prosecution. [Part of FY23 PDM II - Climate Aircraft Efficiency Retrofits]
Develop and test nucleated foam wash for Navy turbine
engines. This technology will significantly increasecleaning capability resulting in much lower engine
temperatures, which results in lower fuel consumption.
[Part of FY23 PDM II - Climate - Aircraft Efficiency
Retrofits]
Develop, and demonstrate blade scanning technology
and turbine engine coatings for compressors blades fornaval aircraft to increase in compressor efficiency,
resulting in lower fuel consumption. [Part of FY23 PDM
II - Climate - Aircraft Efficiency Retrofits]
Fleet Drag - Conduct analysis on drag reduction
technologies for large Navy/USMC aircraft, test thesetechnologies for suitability and transition to fleet
assets. Drag reduction results in less fuel used for
missions or benefits range and Time on Station
metrics. Flight Planning - Develop digital tools to
optimize flight planning across DoD to efficiently

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603724N

245

1,649.871

Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Metering andMonitoring

1319

04

0603724N

11

6,202.782

Supply Chain
Resilience

Metering andMonitoring

1319

04

0603724N

1,017

4,618.343

Supply Chain
Resilience

Conventional
Fuels Testing

1319

04

0603724N

2,713

14,914

Supply Chain
Resilience

Conventional
Fuels Testing

1319

04

0603724N

2,400

14,243

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

09,000

EnergyDemandReduction

Mobile Fuel
Distribution
Assets1319

040603724N

018,500

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

05,000

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

0

23,000

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

0

19,00080

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description
schedule assets and resources to support the Air
Tasking Order. [Part of FY23 PDM II - Climate - Aircraft
Efficiency Retrofits]
Optimize aircraft battery performance, safety and costthrough development of a common, scalable Li ion
battery
Demonstrate using M250 engine utilizing an advanced
recuperator design enabling 25% reduced specific fuelconsumption (SFC). Reduced SFC would provide
extended time on station improvement of 25 - 35%,
critical to ISR mission.

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy - Common
Affordable Safe Energy
Storage

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy - Aircraft
Turbine Engine
Recuperator

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy Integrated Thermal andPower Management
Modelling

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy - High
Efficiency Generator

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy Opportunity Studies

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy - Variable
Vapor Cycle System

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy Advanced Fuel Cells for
UAS Applications

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy - P-8
Finlets

Optimize design, installation and demonstrate of dragreducing finlets on P-8 test aircraft

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy Splittered Rotor
Compressor

Development and validation of advance compressor
design to increase efficiency and reduce weight.

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Battery Commonality

Aircraft Energy Operational Modelingand Simulation
Aircraft Energy - OnBoard ThermalManagement

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

Supply Chain
Resilience

Platform
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

1,020

5,820

Supply Chain
Resilience

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

2,750

967

Development and validation of Integrated Power andthermal management models to develop integrated
solutions in legacy and emerging platforms

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform ThermalManagement

1319

04

0603724N

1,375

7,531

Evaluate and demonstrate alternative aircraft power
generation/conversion technologies to provide more
efficient power generation to meet legacy platform
power deficiencies
Provide seed funding to investigate potential aircraft
Operational Energy solutions (Power and Thermal) andidentify potential candidates to select for detailed
projects.*
Design, build and demonstrate variable vapor cycle
system that provides continuous cold liquid flow andheat rejection at higher temperatures for greater
thermal control on future aircraft applications.
Leverage modeling, simulation, and data sources todevelop assessments and tools to support operational
capability assessments
Demonstrate deoxygenation technology to increase
fuel heat sink capability in order to maximize aircraft
thermal management and increase engine efficiency
Design, build, and test a drop-in ready hydrogen fuelcell power and propulsion (P&P) system for the VTOL
Stalker to demonstrate improved operational
performance.

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

350

1,784

EnergyDemandReduction

M&S, Studies,and Wargames

1319

04

0603724N

350

12,358EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

100

55

M&S, Studies,and Wargames

1319

04

0603724N

45

2,100

Platform ThermalManagement

1319

04

0603724N

55

7,080

Platform
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

415

425

Platform
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

368

130

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

35

50

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

550

3,243

Development of battery commonality. Battery
commonality will save DoN money and time whenfielding advanced weapon systems

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility
EnergyDemandReduction
EnergySubstitution
andDiversification
EnergyDemandReduction
EnergyDemandReduction
Supply Chain
Resilience

81

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description
Reduce the hazard of fielded batteries. Allowing morebattery-based systems to be deployed more quickly will
provide gains in fielding more greener energy sources
and increasing combat capabilities.
Improvements in the battery safety certification
process increasing the rapid safe deployment ofadvanced battery systems to the DoN. Allowing morebattery-based systems to be deployed more quickly will
provide gains in fielding greener energy sources andincreasing combat capabilities.
Develop clear battery, battery system, andcontainment oriented standards and requirements.
Allowing more advanced battery systems to be
deployed more quickly will provide gains in fielding
greener energy sources and increasing combat
capabilities.
Development, laboratory, and Fleet testing todetermine overall mission and cost effectiveness ofimproved storage technologies allowing for thetransition to greener energy and power sources.
Analytics supporting acceleration of advanced
batteries for naval tactical capabilities. [FY 22-10 IR:
Section 8132]

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Battery Hazard Reduction

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Battery Safety
Certification

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Battery Standards

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Battery Technology
Development

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Battery Analytics

NAVY

AIR AND MISSILE
DEFENSE RADAR(AMDR) SYSTEM

Efficient SPY-6
Transmit/Receive
Integrated Multichip
Modules (TRIMM)s (PDM
II)

NAVY

SHIP SELF DEFENSE(ENGAGE: SOFT
KILL/EW)

Efficient SEWIP Block 3
Transmit Integrated
Multichip Modules(TIMM)sNAVY

UNMANNEDCARRIER AVIATION(UCA)

Unmanned Aerial
Refueler

NAVY

UNMANNEDCARRIER AVIATION(UCA)

Unmanned Aerial
Refueler Control System

Development of the MQ-25A mission control system
Mission Control System.

NAVY

SURFACE SUPPORT

LED Lighting on DDG-51
Class Ships

Replacing conventional lighting on DDG-51 class ships
with LED lighting. [FY24 PDM I: Aircraft and Ship
Efficiencies]

Swapping the High-Power Amplifiers with higher
efficiency power amplifiers, reducing the overall DC
power consumption on the ship. [FY23 PDM II Climate DDGX IPS]
Swapping TIMMs in SEWIP Block 3 with a higher
efficiency High Power Amplifier (HPA)s. They would
reduce the DC Power required to power SEWIP and
reduce ship fuel consumption. [FY23 PDM II - Climate
DDGX IPS]
Development of first CVN-based organic mission andrecovery tanker. MQ-25 will extend the range andincrease lethality of the CSG's CVW, and willcontribute to F/A-18EF shortfall by relieving tanker
duties and returning a/c to the strike fighter role. MQ25 will also have a secondary ISR capability. IOC
4QFY24.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

834

9,678

Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

476

7,260

Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

358

2,220

Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

872

5,461

Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603724N

1,200

0EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

05

0604522N

02,000

EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

05

0604757N

02,000

Supply Chain
Resilience

Mobile Fuel
Distribution
Assets1319

050605414N

212,150

825,343

Mobile Fuel
Distribution
Assets1319

050605414N

45,737

97,012

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1810

01

0204228N

07,500Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility
EnergyDemandReduction

82

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description
Supports Installation and Procurement of ICAS
(Integrated Condition Assessment System) and eRM(Enterprise Remote Monitoring). These systems enableremote monitoring and real time health assessmentsof shipboard equipment.
Basic research in multifunctional structural batteries.
[FY22 & FY23 Cong. Program Increase Multifunctional structural batteries, C697]
Investment in workforce talent and technology
development supporting Navy power and energy
systems. [FY22 & FY23 Cong. Program Increase C499]
Energy resilience research addressing increasing
numbers of high-power sensors and weapon systems,with intent to increase energy performance, and reduceenergy cost and logistical burden on operational
forces. [FY22 & FY24 Cong. Program Increase -C505]
Develops technologies that capture carbon dioxidefrom seawater and the air to turn such carbon dioxide
into clean fuels to enhance fuel and energy security.
[FY22 & FY23 Cong. Program Increase - C606]
Applied research in advanced energy systems having
potential to reduce the cost of energy and increaseenergy security, reliability, and resiliency. [FY22 Cong.
Program Increase - C673]

NAVY

SURFACE SUPPORT

Condition Assessment
SystemNAVY

DEFENSERESEARCHSCIENCES

Multifunctional structural
batteries

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Talent and technology forNavy power and energy
systems

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Energy Resilience Efforts

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Direct Air Capture andBlue Carbon RemovalTechnology

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Navy Alternative Energy
Research

NAVY

OCEAN
WARFIGHTINGENVIRONMENTAPPLIED RESEARCH

Operational
Demonstration of Long
Endurance USV

Applied research to demonstrate commerciallyavailable, long endurance USV [FY22 Program
Increase, C716]

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONADVANCEDTECHNOLOGYPower electronics
building block

Applied Research in power electronics building blocks
for energy storage and distribution. [FY22 and FY23
Cong. Program Increase - C723]

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONADVANCEDTECHNOLOGY

Energy storage flywheel

Applied research in carbon nanotube energy storage
flywheel [FY22 Cong. Program Increase - C724]

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Aircraft Energy Efficiency

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Ship Energy Efficiency

Aircraft energy R&D projects including advancing H2
Stalker, Improved Lithium Battery State ofCharge/State of Healther Algorithms, and CH-53K
Hybrid Inlet Particle Protection Subscale Testing.
[FY22 Cong. Program Increase, C758]
Ship energy R&D including USV Condition Based
Maintenance, PA6B optimization, shipboard Hydrogen
R&D, and Energy Supportability Analyses. [FY22 Cong.
Program Increase, C758]

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

Supply Chain
Resilience

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1810

01

0204228N

808

4,286

Supply Chain
Resilience

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

01

0601153N

2,000

3,000

Supply Chain
Resilience

Training and
Education

1319

02

0602123N

10,50010,500

Supply Chain
Resilience

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

02

0602123N

7,000

8,000

Alternative Fuels
Production

1319

02

0602123N

10,00010,000

Alternative Power
Sources1319

020602123N

27,5000

Propulsion
Upgrades_Sea

1319

02

0602435N

5,000

0Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

03

0603123N

6,000

6,000

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

03

0603123N

4,000

0EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Air

1319

04

0603724N

8,120

0EnergyDemandReduction

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1319

04

0603724N

6,351

0EnergySubstitution
andDiversification
EnergySubstitution
andDiversification
EnergyDemandReduction
EnergySubstitution
andDiversification
EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

83

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Cargo Drone Family of
Advanced Batteries

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Marine/Ocean
Renewable Energy

NAVY

LITTORAL COMBATSHIP (LCS)

Littoral Combat Ship
(LCS) Stern Flaps

NAVY
NAVY

UNDERWAYREPLENISHMENTSHIPSUNDERWAYREPLENISHMENTSHIPS

T-AO 205 Efficient
Replacement Engines
Variable Frequency
Drives and LED Lighting
on MSC Ships

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

NRL - Energy

NAVY

FORCE PROTECTIONAPPLIED RESEARCH

Propulsion Task Force
Energy (TFE)

NAVY

NAVY

NAVY

ADVANCED
SURFACEMACHINERYSYSTEMSADVANCED
SURFACEMACHINERYSYSTEMSADVANCED
SURFACEMACHINERYSYSTEMSOE Project Description
Designing and fabricating smart batteries in the US for
the fleet and creating a family of safe, reliable, andultra-high capacity UAS batteries to benefit the current
and next generation of Blue Water Maritime Logistics
UAS. [FY22 Cong. Program Increase, C782]
Continued advancements in marine energy R&D andcorresponding infrastructure are needed for the Navy tofield ocean renewable energy, including marine andhydrokinetic energy systems. [FY23 Cong. Program
Increase, Navy energy systems, C875]
Complete engineering for stern flap installations on
LCS. [FY22 PDM III-Operational Energy LOE 3 Add Ship Mods]
Upgrading future T-AO 205 Class hulls with more
efficient engines. [FY22 PDM III-Operational Energy
LOE 3 Add - Ship Mods]
Integration of Variable Frequency Drives and LED
Lighting on Combat Logistics Ships. [FY24 PDM I:
Aircraft and Ship Efficiencies]
Long term Basic and Applied research into phenomena
and mechanisms allowing for more efficient conversionof power; generation of power from solar illumination;from hydrogen conversion in fuel cells; storage ofenergy in improved battery technologies; augmentationof liquid fuels for greater energy density andexploitation of biological mechanisms for longduration energy sources.
This Program, in partnership with the Variable Cycle
Advance Technology (VCAT) program, has the objective
to develop variable geometry and adaptive cycle gas
turbine engine technology for next generation air
dominance aircraft. The benefits of these technologies
are anticipated to be reduced fuel consumption andhence greater operational range and reduced logistics
tail, mostly by reducing the demand for deployed fueland tanker aircraft support.

Integrated Power
Systems (IPS)

Developing land-based test site for the integrated
power and energy system for DDG(X). [PB23 PDM II DDGX IPS]

Integrated Power &Energy Systems

Development of Next Generation Integrated Power andEnergy System (NGIPES) technology aboard Navy Ships
to enable current and future weapons and sensor
systems.

Silicon Carbide Power
ModulesDevelop, qualify, and integrate SiC devices into
prototype power converter. [FY22 Cong. Program
Increase, C447]

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

ProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

Supply Chain
Resilience

040603724N

8,688

0EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

1319

04

0603724N

0

5,000

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1810

01

0204230N

850

1,270

Propulsion
Upgrades_Sea

1611

05

0204441N

11,4700

Platform
Upgrades_Sea

1804

01

0204441N

01,500

EnergyDemandReduction

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

02

0602123N

08,589

EnergyDemandReduction

Propulsion
Upgrades_Air

1319

02

0602123N

8,833

44,459Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603573N

0308,400

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603573N

1,930

13,095Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

04

0603573N

10,0000EnergyDemandReduction
EnergyDemandReduction
EnergyDemandReduction

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification
EnergySubstitution
andDiversification
EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeStorage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

Alternative Power
Sources84

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeEnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

1319

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Alternative Fuels
Certification andTesting

Conduct RDTE necessary to assure that Naval tacticalforces (air, sea, and ground) can operate seamlessly
using allied and/or commercially procured fuels

Supply Chain
Resilience

Fields and sustains GENISYS on the DDG-51 class and
LPD-17 class with fleet wide implementation to follow.
The GENISYS software suite increases operationalreach and endurance through the capture andutilization of shipboard power and energy data. The
Electronic Logbook (eLogBook) application replaces
engineering, deck and other paper logs with electronic
versions. The Shipboard Energy Assessment System(SEAS) application digitizes & aggregates energy andlogbook data to inform crew decision-making. The
ashore application, Fleet Energy Conservation
Dashboard (FECD), supports fleet fuel planning bycollecting surface fleet power and energy data from avariety of sources to analyze and display energy
production, consumption and efficiency of the fleet,ship class, ship, or ship system. [FY23 PDM II Climate DDGX IPS PDM Load Sheet]Enterprisewide Energy
Visibility

ADVANCED
SURFACEMACHINERYSYSTEMS

Solid State Circuit
Breaker

Solid state circuit breaker development [FY22 Cong.
Program Increase, C755]

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Mobility Fuels - TriService SAF Industry
Alignment

NAVY

NAVY ENERGYPROGRAM

Mobility Fuels Interoperability with
Commercial and Allied
forcesCoordinate Service review of commercially approved
Sustainable Aviation Fuels to align Services andincrease interoperability with commercial
specifications. [FY22 PDM III-Operational Energy LOE
3 Add - Alt Fuel Qualification]

NAVY

NAVY

ORG

USMC

INFORMATIONAUTOMATIONOE Program Title

Medium Tactical
VehicleReplacement (MTVR)

Global Energy
Information System(GENISYS)OE Initiative Title

Electrified MTTProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

04

0603573N

2,000

0

1319

04

0603724N

2,000

0Alternative Fuels
Certification andTesting1319

040603724N

900

4,757

Metering andMonitoring

1804

01

0708020N

0

10,525

Navy Total

588,566

2,589,252

ProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

0702808M

193

2,677

OE Project Description

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

Analyze, develop, prototype, engineer, and procure a
Next Generation Medium Tactical Truck. The smaller
and lighter system will use a hybrid electric drive to
reduce fuel consumption, extend operational range,and provide an exportable power capability, use amodular and open systems architecture, incorporate
scalable armor, facilitate advanced condition-based
maintenance; all while improving or maintaining thesame maneuverability and fordability as the current
MTVR.

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Land

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

TreasuryCode

BA Code

1106

01

85

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

USMC

Expeditionary Energy
OfficeExpeditionary Energy
Office

USMC

Applied Research

Energy Efficiency and
Demand Reduction

USMC

Expeditionary Fuel
Systems

Fuel Distribution

USMC

Mobile Power
Equipment

Advance Power Sources

USMC

Mobile Power
Equipment

Advance Power Sources

OE Project Description
This funding will accommodate the incremental
science and technology efforts that will inform the final
requirements for the Medium Tactical Truck (MTT),
which is the replacement for the Medium Tactical
Vehicle Replacement (MTVR). Specifically, it will
support an effort through the Office of Naval Research(ONR) spanning two fiscal years that includes
designing/building/fabricating (FY24), and testing(FY25) the MTT advanced technology demonstrator.
Applied Research to increase energy efficiency inweapons systems, platforms, vehicles and equipment
and extend tactical range/operational reach.
Development of an Autonomous littoral focused fueldistribution system to enable distributed operations
and persistence of the Marine Littoral Regiment
The Family of Mobile Power Equipment is a family-ofsystems to continuously procure, update, andreplenish approximately 19,000 items of Mobile
Tactical Power Generation & Distribution Equipment toinclude the AMMPS system, and 22 different TAMCNs.
The Family of Mobile Electric Power Equipment
consists of skid & trailer mounted tactical generators
ranging from 2 to 200 kilowatts, Mobile Electric PowerDistribution Systems, Floodlight Sets, Load Banks &Electricians Tool Kits. This equipment is procured &fielded to provide electricity on the battlefield.
Combat, combat support & combat service support
units all require tactical power to operate weaponssystems, C4I systems, medical & messing facilities,
environmental control equipment, & water purification
systems.
The Family of Mobile Power Equipment is a family-ofsystems to continuously procure, update, andreplenish approximately 19,000 items of Mobile
Tactical Power Generation & Distribution Equipment toinclude the AMMPS system, and 22 different TAMCNs.
The Family of Mobile Electric Power Equipment
consists of skid & trailer mounted tactical generators
ranging from 2 to 200 kilowatts, Mobile Electric PowerDistribution Systems, Floodlight Sets, Load Banks &Electricians Tool Kits. This equipment is procured &fielded to provide electricity on the battlefield.
Combat, combat support & combat service support
units all require tactical power to operate weaponssystems, C4I systems, medical & messing facilities,
environmental control equipment, & water purification
systems.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Land

1319

04

0603635M

06,000

EnergyDemandReduction

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

1319

02

0602131M

9,239

18,112

Supply Chain
Resilience

Metering andMonitoring

1109

06

0206315M

0

7,619

Supply Chain
Resilience

Contingency
Basing1106

010206624M

874

4,639

Supply Chain
Resilience

Contingency
Basing1109

060206211M

16,04095,81586

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

USMC

Mobile Power
Equipment

Advance Power Sources

USMC

Mobile Power
Equipment

Advance Power Sources

USMC

Mobile Power
Equipment

Advance Power Sources

OE Project Description
The Family of Mobile Power Equipment is a family-ofsystems to continuously procure, update, andreplenish approximately 19,000 items of Mobile
Tactical Power Generation & Distribution Equipment toinclude the AMMPS system, and 22 different TAMCNs.
The Family of Mobile Electric Power Equipment
consists of skid & trailer mounted tactical generators
ranging from 2 to 200 kilowatts, Mobile Electric PowerDistribution Systems, Floodlight Sets, Load Banks &Electricians Tool Kits. This equipment is procured &fielded to provide electricity on the battlefield.
Combat, combat support & combat service support
units all require tactical power to operate weaponssystems, C4I systems, medical & messing facilities,
environmental control equipment, & water purification
systems.
The Family of Mobile Power Equipment is a family-ofsystems to continuously procure, update, andreplenish approximately 19,000 items of Mobile
Tactical Power Generation & Distribution Equipment toinclude the AMMPS system, and 22 different TAMCNs.
The Family of Mobile Electric Power Equipment
consists of skid & trailer mounted tactical generators
ranging from 2 to 200 kilowatts, Mobile Electric PowerDistribution Systems, Floodlight Sets, Load Banks &Electricians Tool Kits. This equipment is procured &fielded to provide electricity on the battlefield.
Combat, combat support & combat service support
units all require tactical power to operate weaponssystems, C4I systems, medical & messing facilities,
environmental control equipment, & water purification
systems.
The Family of Mobile Power Equipment is a family-ofsystems to continuously procure, update, andreplenish approximately 19,000 items of Mobile
Tactical Power Generation & Distribution Equipment toinclude the AMMPS system, and 22 different TAMCNs.
The Family of Mobile Electric Power Equipment
consists of skid & trailer mounted tactical generators
ranging from 2 to 200 kilowatts, Mobile Electric PowerDistribution Systems, Floodlight Sets, Load Banks &Electricians Tool Kits. This equipment is procured &fielded to provide electricity on the battlefield.
Combat, combat support & combat service support
units all require tactical power to operate weaponssystems, C4I systems, medical & messing facilities,
environmental control equipment, & water purification
systems.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

Supply Chain
Resilience

Contingency
Basing1109

060502511M

0

10,228Supply Chain
Resilience

Contingency
Basing1109

060502514M

0

15,574

Supply Chain
Resilience

Alternative Power
Sources1319

070206624M

3,171

17,58387

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

USMC

Medium Tactical
VehicleReplacement (MTVR)

Electrified MTT

USMCMedium Tactical
VehicleReplacement (MTVR)

Electrified MTT

USMC

Family of Shelters
and Shelter
Equipment

Shelters, Shelter Liners,and Lighting upgrades

USMC

Expeditionary Energy
OfficeExpeditionary Energy
Office

USMC

MCWL/Futures
Directorate

Hybrid Expeditionary
Power

USMC

Advanced
Technology Demo

Energy Optimization andLogistic Burden
Reduction

USMC

Expeditionary Fuel
Systems

Fuel Distribution

OE Project Description
Analyze, develop, prototype, engineer, and procure a
Next Generation Medium Tactical Truck. The smaller
and lighter system will use a hybrid electric drive to
reduce fuel consumption, extend operational range,and provide an exportable power capability, use amodular and open systems architecture, incorporate
scalable armor, facilitate advanced condition-based
maintenance; all while improving or maintaining thesame maneuverability and fordability as the current
MTVR.
Analyze, develop, prototype, engineer, and procure a
Next Generation Medium Tactical Truck. The smaller
and lighter system will use a hybrid electric drive to
reduce fuel consumption, extend operational range,and provide an exportable power capability, use amodular and open systems architecture, incorporate
scalable armor, facilitate advanced condition-based
maintenance; all while improving or maintaining thesame maneuverability and fordability as the current
MTVR.
R&D for future shelter systems and USMC lighting
solution of the future.
E2O is currently focused on analyzing and developing
Operational Energy solutions to support distributed
operations, Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations,and the Marine Littoral Regiments. This is done
through modelling and simulation and the Small Unit
Power initiative as well as the modernization of bulk
fuel assets.
Combining proven technologies in a novel way,program seeks to provide an ULTV towable, V-22/CH53/C130 transportable, Mobile Hybrid Power sourcethat can use multiple fuel types to provide quiet
sustained power.
Advanced Technology Demonstration research to
optimize energy usage and/or meet operational energy
demand with renewable energy sources and reduce
excess capacity or reduce logistic footprint/burdenenergy sources.
Development of an Autonomous littoral focused fueldistribution system to enable distributed operations
and persistence of the Marine Littoral Regiment

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Land

1109

05

0206315M

7,035

37,429EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Platform
Upgrades_Land

1319

07

0206624M

36

195

EnergyDemandReduction

Contingency
Basing1319

070206623M

9

1,244

Supply Chain
Resilience

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

1319

07

0206313M

1,291

35,189EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

1319

03

0603640M

727

4,297

EnergyDemandReduction

Individual/Warfig
hter Power

1319

03

0603640M

5,429

32,841

Supply Chain
Resilience

Metering andMonitoring

1319

07

0206623M

08,238

USMC Total

44,044

297,68088

ORG

OE Program Title

OUSD(A&S)
OUSD(A&S)
OUSD(A&
S)

ORG

DLA

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

Office Under
Secretary of Defense

Operational Energy

Identify and reduce logistics and operational risk

Office Under
Secretary of Defense

Operational Energy
Capability Improvement
Fund (OECIF)

Advanced technologies in operational energy acrosswarfighting platforms and domains

Office Under
Secretary of Defense

Operational Energy
Capability Improvement Non S&T

Operational energy prototype and demonstration

OE Program Title

Battery Network
manufacturing
technology R&D
programOE Initiative Title

BATTNETOE Project Description
The Battery Network manufacturing technology R&D
program, along with Small Business Innovation
Research (SBIR) investments, supported multiple
efforts to improve supply and performance, address
obsolescence, and reduce costs for batteries used infielded weapons or soldier systems. DLA establishedthe manufacturing design and processes for
significantly lighter, bi-polar lead-acid batteries andplans to deliver MIL-32143 and MIL-8565/11 battery
sets, respectively, to the Army Ground Vehicle Systems
Center (GVSC) and Navy Surface Warfare Center(NSWC) for testing and qualification in 2023. Lighter
batteries will lower fuel use in assigned systems anddistribution logistics. DLA also initiated design
analyses of lithium-ion alternatives for multiple nickelcadmium batteries which can improve supply chain
viability, lower battery weight, increase power andenergy, and significantly extend battery life (which
lowers replenishment requirements).

OE Strategy
Objectives
Supply Chain
Resilience
EnergySubstitution
andDiversification
EnergySubstitution
andDiversification

OE Strategy
Objectives

Supply Chain
Resilience

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA CodeProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

Policy andOversight

0100

04

0903399D8Z

5,539

96,683Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

0400

03

0604055D8Z

107,989

913,774

Storage, Power
Controls andDistribution

0400

04

0604555D8Z

23,069272,344

OUSD(A&S)
Total

136,597

1,282,801

ProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

0603680s

2,550

18,337OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA Code

0400

03

DLA also continued work on a range of technicalenhancements to battery systems. These
improvements include lower cost, high-quality
production of carbon monofluoride used in superior
non-rechargeable batteries (BA-5790), leveraging
solid-state electrolytes to improve small system battery
safety (BB-2590), and leveraging battery deactivationand materials separation/reclamation processes for

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

89

ORG

OE Program Title

OE Initiative Title

OE Project Description

OE Strategy
Objectives

OE Activity
Classification

TreasuryCode

BA Code0400

03

ProgramElement

FY2022
($K)

FYDP
($K)

0603712S

2,166

11,942DLA Total

4,716

30,279more efficient, non-hazardous, disposition of batteries
around the world.

DLA

Energy Readiness
Program (ERP)

Energy ReadinessDirectly supports the DoD Class III Bulk fuel and energy
supply system through a multi-faceted approach toaddressing issues connected to the entire spans of thesystem, in coordination with the military services. The
program addresses issues connected with ensuring
operation fuel integrity, supply chain infrastructure
maintenance, and alternative (non-petroleum based)
drop-in replacement fuel certifications. Encompasses
activities aligned with bulk hydrocarbon fuels andaerospace products stability, contamination,
additization, storage/handling, filtration andalternative fuel certifications.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

Supply Chain
Resilience90Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

91

Appendix G - Recommended Change in Organization or
Authority
The Department has no recommendations for changes in organization or authority.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

92

Appendix H - Installation Energy Program Management
H.1. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Environment andEnergy Resilience (ODASD(E&ER))
The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment (ASD (EI&E)) is within
the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. ODASD(E&ER) is
within ASD (EI&E) and prescribes policies and procedures, provides guidance, and monitors and reviews
programs related to energy, environment, climate resilience, facilities management, infrastructure,logistics, and materiel readiness in the DoD (see Figure H-1).

Figure H-1. Department of Defense Energy Management Organizational Structure

The mission of ODASD(E&ER) is to sustain warfighting readiness and lethality by providing all energyrelated policy and governance for programs and activities that enable resilient, efficient, and cyber-secureenergy for Joint forces, weapon systems, and installations. To accomplish this mission, ODASD(E&ER)
supports initiatives across four primary areas:•

Energy Resilience: Enhancing the military capability, readiness, and resilience of DoD installations andforces through assured access to resilient and cyber-secure fuel and power•

Energy Risk: Identifying, assessing, and integrating energy-related analyses and risks into Department
decision-making associated with requirements, deliberate planning, wargames and exercises, installation
master planning, Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program (ERCIP), and investments inforces and installations•

Energy Performance: Ensuring energy efficiency and lower costs at DoD installations through reliable,
efficient use of power and alternative financing mechanisms•

Cyber-Secure Facilities: Reducing the cyber risks to facility-related control systems to ensure reliable
power for critical missions

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2293

H.2. Department of the Army—Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations,
Energy, and Environment (ASA (IE&E))
The Army’s energy, water, and sustainability programs fall under the purview of the Assistant Secretaryof the Army for Installations, Energy, and Environment (ASA (IE&E)), as shown in Figure H-2. The
ASA IE&E establishes policy, provides strategic direction, and supervises all matters pertaining to
infrastructure, Army installations and contingency bases, energy, and environmental programs to enableglobal Army operations.

Figure H-2. Department of Army Energy Management Organizational Structure

H.3. Department of the Navy (DoN)—Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy,
Installations, and Environment (ASN(EI&E))
The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy is the principal advisor to the Assistant Secretaryof the Navy for Energy, Installations, and Environment (ASN(EI&E)) on Operational and Installation
Energy and Water. Within the Secretariat, the Directors for Operational and Installation Energy are
responsible for energy readiness and resilience. The DoN Energy Management Enterprise is illustrated in
Figure H-3 below.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

94

Figure H-3. Department of Navy Energy Management Organizational Structure

The Deputy Commandant for Installations and Logistics (DC I&L) is responsible for establishing energy
and water management policy for United States Marine Corps (USMC) installations in accordance with
the Commandant’s direction. The Assistant Deputy Commandant for Installations and Logistics(Facilities) serves as the single point of contact responsible for program management and resourcing.
The Commander, Marine Corps Installations Command (MCICOM) oversees program planning andexecution with direct support provided by the Director, Facilities (MCICOM GF).

H.4. Department of the Air Force—Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Energy,
Installations, and Environment (SAF/IE)
Headquarters, United States Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, Engineering, and Force
Protection (AF/A4) provides information required to support governance and oversight of energy
management activities across DAF installations. The AF/A4 develops guidance, procedures, andpractices to enhance DAF energy assurance with the goal of energy resilience and ensures energy security
to meet mission-essential requirements. The DAF’s organizational structure for energy oversight isshown in Figure H-4.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2295

Figure H-4. Department of Air Force Energy Management Organizational Structure

H.5. Defense Agencies
The Defense Agencies continue to enhance their installation energy management programs andcoordinate with stakeholders to address energy and water resilience issues. Where agencies exist as
tenants on installations, they work to participate in host-installation energy conservation and resilience
programs. Each has a designated senior energy official to administer their respective program (Table I1).
Table H-1. Defense Agencies Senior Energy Officials
DoD Component

Senior Energy Official

Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA)

Energy Program Manager

Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA)

Energy Program Manager

Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)

Director, Enterprise Management Service

Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)

Director, Office of Facilities and Services

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)

Installation Management Director

Missile Defense Agency (MDA)

Environmental Executive

National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA)

Director, Installation Operations Office

National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)

Chief, Facilities Support Group

National Security Agency (NSA)

Chief of Installations and Logistics

Washington Headquarters Services (WHS)

Pentagon Energy Program Manager

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

96

Appendix I - Third Party Financing Authorities
Funding Mechanism
Energy Savings
PerformanceContracts (ESPC)

Utility Energy Service
Contracts (UESC)

Authority
Title 42
U.S.C. §8287

Title 10
U.S.C. §2913(d)Power Purchase
Agreement (PPA)

Title 10
U.S.C. §2922a

Enhanced Use Leases(EUL)

Title 10
U.S.C. §2667

Definition
Title 42 U.S.C. § 8287 c(3) defines an ESPC as “a contract that provides for the
performance of services for the design, acquisition, installation, testing, and, whereappropriate, operation, maintenance, and repair, of an identified energy or water
conservation measure or series of measures at 1 or more locations.” Title 42 U.S.C. §8287 provides that ESPCs may be entered into “solely for the purpose of achieving
energy savings and benefits ancillary to that purpose,” the term of which may be up to
25 years.
The Energy Service Contractor (ESCO) conducts a comprehensive energy audit for theFederal facility and identifies improvements to save energy. In consultation with theFederal agency, the ESCO designs and constructs a project that meets the agency’s
needs. The ESCO must incur the costs of implementing energy savings measures, inexchange for a share of any energy savings directly resulting from implementation ofsuch measures during the term of the contract. The ESPC must guarantee savings.
Aggregate annual payments by the agency to both utilities and ESCOs may not exceed
the amount that the agency would have paid for utilities without an ESPC duringcontract years. After the contract ends, all additional cost savings accrue to theagency.
Title 10 U.S.C. § 2913 (d) authorizes agreements “with gas or electric utilities todesign and implement cost-effective demand and conservation incentive programs(including energy management services, facilities alterations, and the installation andmaintenance of energy saving devices and technologies by the utilities) to address therequirements and circumstances of the installation.” These agreements are referred
to as UESCs. While the maximum term of a UESC is not set in statute, DFARS
241.103(2) authorizes UESCs for a period not to exceed 25 years.
A UESC may be structured to provide that the utility advances the initial capital costsof the project, which are repaid over the contract term from the cost savings generated
by the energy efficiency measures from funds available to a military department forthe purchase of utility services. Title to energy-saving devices or technologies
installed pursuant to the UESC must vest in the United States. There is no statutory
requirement that the utility guarantee savings.
Title 10 U.S.C. § 2922a authorizes contracts for periods of up to 30 years for (1)development of geothermal energy resources on military land, and (2) for the provisionand operation of energy production facilities (located on property under thejurisdiction of the Secretary concerned or on private property) and the purchase ofenergy produced from such facilities. The costs of the project may be paid fromannual appropriations each year. Contracts must be approved by the Secretary of
Defense.
Title 10 U.S.C. § 2667 authorizes the Secretaries of military departments to leaseproperty under the Secretary’s jurisdiction if certain conditions are met, and accept
cash or in-kind consideration in an amount not less than the fair market value of thelease interest. This authority is used in a wide array of contexts. When Title 10 U.S.C.
§ 2667 is used as the primary authority for an energy project, land is typically leased
to a third party for the purpose of operating and maintaining an energy generation
and/or storage facility. The fair market value of the lease interest is provided to theinstallation in the form of energy services – such as the right to use the facility during
grid outages, or, if the lease interest is more valuable, the provision of related
equipment to enhance installation use of the facility, such as the provision ofequipment to form a functioning microgrid. Initial investment using appropriatedfunds may also be required to enable the project to provide energy resilience to theinstallation if the fair market value of the lease interest is low.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2297

Funding Mechanism
Easements for rightsof-way

Authority
Title 10
U.S.C. §2668

Utilities Privatization(UP)

Title 10
U.S.C. §2688

Definition
Title 10 U.S.C. § 2668 authorizes the Secretaries of military departments to grant
easements for rights-of-way over lands under the Secretary’s control if certain
conditions are met. Title 10 U.S. Code § 2668 specifically authorizes twelve
easements for rights-of-way, and provides that the Secretary concerned may grant
easements for rights-of-way for “any other purpose that the Secretary considers
advisable.” Such purposes could include purposes relating to energy use andtransmission, if appropriate for a right-of-way, such as inverters, transfer switches,
uninterruptible power supplies (UPS), and depending on the project, batteries andgeneration.
Title 10 U.S.C. § 2688 authorizes the conveyance of utility systems owned by amilitary department to a third party, along with a contract for utility services to operate
and maintain the utility system on behalf of the installation, which may have a term of
up to 50 years. Improvements to the privatized utility system, including those that thatenhance energy resilience, may be financed through the contract for utility services.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

98

Appendix J - Briefing on Energy Resilience of Bases
Supporting Nuclear Deterrence Missions

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY2299

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22100

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22101

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22102

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22103

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

104

Appendix K - Briefing on Bi-directional Charging
UNCLASSIFIED

Briefing on Bi-directional Charging

May 2023

UNCLASSIFIED

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

105

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

106

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

107

Appendix L - Briefing on Wireless Electric Vehicle Charging
for Military Installations
UNCLASSIFIED

Briefing on Wireless Electric Vehicle
Charging for Military Installations

May 2023

UNCLASSIFIED

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22108

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22109

Appendix M – Briefing on Fielding Natural Gas andPropane Generators at Military Installations
UNCLASSIFIED

Fielding Natural Gas and Propane
Generators at Military Installations
March 2023

UNCLASSIFIED

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22110

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

111

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22112

Appendix N – Briefing on the Use of Utilities Privatization
to Improve Energy Resilience
UNCLASSIFIED

Appendix O
Department of Defense
Utilities Privatization Program

UNCLASSIFIED

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

113

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22114

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

115

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

116

Appendix O - Report on Military Installation Grid
Resiliency
House Report 117-397, accompanying H.R. 7776, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2023
Department of Defense Report on Military Installation Grid Resiliency
The committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the House Committee on Armed
Services not later than March 1, 2023, analyzing resiliency of electrical distribution infrastructure on
military installations in an environment of increasing disruption due to extreme weather. U.S. military
installations should be able to withstand foreseeable weather conditions such as high winds, flooding,wildfires, and excessive load due to ice or snow with minimal service interruption and every effort to use
new technology and materials should be explored to improve resiliency and readiness during adverse
conditions. The report shall include, at a minimum:(1) Details of the overall state of resiliency of on-installation distribution grids.
(2) Analysis of the costs and benefits of requiring composite utility poles as replacements for poles madeof traditional material in contracts for electrical services on installations vulnerable to extreme weather.
(3) Other information as the Secretary deems appropriate.
The Department of Defense (DoD) recognizes that the success of critical missions relies on our access tosecure, reliable power and the ability to control that power, allocating it to key installation activities. To
this end, the DoD has in place a deliberative process to ensure a high level of resilience related to thepower distribution systems present on DoD installations. This is accomplished by requiring the use ofresilience assessment tools, developing projects, and implementing policy measures to assess risk andresource improvements. The DoD uses the DoD Climate Assessment Tool (DCAT) to assess exposure toclimate impacts on military installations, including the impacts of extreme weather on our distribution
systems. Similarly, DoD installations continue to conduct BSEs, using an all-hazards approach todetermine gaps in their energy resilience posture and execute a full-scale test on the abilities of theirdistribution systems. Through the Energy Resilience Conservation and Investment Program (ERCIP),
the DoD then regularly resources large-scale upgrades to on-installation distribution capabilities, often in
the form of microgrids and distribution system upgrades, with validated resilience benefits. These
combined actions ensure the resilience of our distribution systems in the face of weather conditions suchas high winds, flooding, wildfires, and excessive load due to ice or snow at a level that allows them toaccomplish their critical missions.
To achieve desired levels of installation energy resilience, the Department prioritizes on-site power
generation. Currently, this is best achieved through a combination of fossil fuel and renewable energy
assets, connected through micro-grids with on-site power storage. In the future, the Department wishes
to increase the role of carbon free, baseload power sources to include advanced nuclear and next-gen
geothermal. Specific to the distribution of resilient power on installations, there are many alternatives the
DoD has evaluated to address risk associated with wood utility poles. Examples range from pole
replacement with poles made from other materials, such as composite, to more system-wide approaches
such as undergrounding of power lines to eliminate the need for poles altogether. The business case formaking such distribution system enhancement to support energy resilience varies based on numerous
local and regional factors, combined with an analysis of risk, extreme weather related or otherwise.
Technology selection for improving energy resilience is best assessed on a case-by-case basis, with afocus on critical mission requirements and the relevant assessment of risk for each specific installation.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

117

Appendix P - Report on Implementation by Department of
Defense of Requirements Relating to Renewable FuelPumps
JES accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (p. 86)
Report on implementation by Department of Defense of requirements relating to renewable fuel pumps
The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 353) that would require the Secretary of Defense tosubmit a report on renewable fuel pumps to the Congress not later than 90 days after the date of theenactment of this Act. The House bill contained no similar provision. The Senate recedes. The
conferees direct the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives, not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of thisAct, on the Department of Defense’s implementation of the requirements under section 246(a) of theEnergy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17053(a)). The report shall include thefollowing:(1) An estimate of the cost to the Department of fully implementing the requirements under section 246(a)of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007; and(2) An assessment of any problems or issues the Department is having in complying with the requirements
under such section. The report required shall not apply to a fueling center of the Department with a fuelturnover rate of less than 100,000 gallons of fuel per year.
The estimated cost to comply with EISA 2007 to deploy renewable fuel pumps at seventy-six Federal
Fueling Centers is between $2.2M - $7.5M.
The DoD has not encountered issues in complying with section 246(a) of the Energy Independence andSecurity Act of 2007. Deployment of renewable fueling infrastructure or pumps is executed through anassessment process which includes stakeholders such as service-level installation fleet management,
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), General Services Administration (GSA), and local government andauthorities. Siting for Federal Fueling Centers requires compliance with local and state laws, as well as
adherence to Federal guidelines regarding fleet requirements. As such, renewable fuel pumps are
installed as necessary where utilization will justify the expense of installation.
The DoD considers the following factors regarding deployment of additional renewable fuel pumps:•

Changes to renewable fueling infrastructure depend on the needs of the fleet local to the pumps.
Renewable fuels, such as E85, B20, compressed natural gas (CNG), and liquified petroleum gas(LPG), are provided at many DoD Federal Fueling Centers and their use is determined by vehicle
engine type and manufacturer fueling specifications. Not all vehicles in the DoD fleet are able toutilize renewable fuels. The DoD does not currently have data to determine the utilization rate ofany of the renewable fuels at these 76 locations.
The table below provides a breakdown of renewable fuel pump characteristics at DoD Federal
Fueling Centers dispensing >100,000 gallons of fuel per year.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

118

Fuel pumps that dispense more than 100,000 gallons of fuel per year
Total Federal Fueling Centers w/>100k gallons dispensed

118

Federal Fueling Centers w/ >= 1 RE fuel pump42

Federal Fueling Centers w/ no RE fuel pumps

76•

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Legislation (BIL) which came into effect in 2022 establishes a grant
program to strategically deploy publicly accessible electric vehicle charging infrastructure,hydrogen fueling infrastructure, propane fueling infrastructure, and natural gas fuelinginfrastructure along designated alternative fuel corridors or in certain other locations that will beaccessible to all drivers of electric vehicles, hydrogen vehicles, propane vehicles, and natural gas
vehicles. DoD vehicle users are able to purchase fuel off-site, thereby leveraging programs suchas the grant program cited above to fuel DoD- owned and -leased vehicles with renewable fuels.
With the expansion of renewable fueling infrastructure as part of the requirements in the BIL,
DoD vehicle users will have additional access to renewable fuels at fueling locations not
associated with the Federal government.

•

Fueling requirements are constantly adjusted due to changes in fleet composition. The initiative
to electrify the Federal fleet by 2030, as outlined in EO 14057, is expected to create an influx ofelectric vehicles into the fleet, which will impact the need for renewable fuel pumps going
forward. The deployment of electric vehicles and electric vehicle support equipment (EVSE)
will result in many more light-duty and personal vehicles utilizing clean electricity to power
mobility. The DoD will continue to assess non-tactical vehicle fleet fueling needs and deploy
renewable fuel pumps as needed and determined by site location and analyses

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducted a study in 2008 to determine the range ofcosts to install an E85 fuel pump at an existing gasoline station. 16 The cost estimates for installing a newtank versus converting an old tank to renewable fuel are captured in the table below:

Scenario
New tank,
new or retrofit
dispenser(s)Cost
Mean: $71,735
Median: $59,153

SourceNREL
SurveyConvertexisting tank,
new or retrofit
dispenser(s)Mean: $21,031
Median: $11,237

NREL
SurveyDescription
Includes new
storage tank, pump,dispenser(s), piping,wiring, excavation,and concrete work
Tank cleaning,
replace non-compatible
components in piping
and dispensers

Variables affecting cost
Dispenser needs, excavation,
concrete work, sell backs, canopy,
tank size, location, labor price,
regulations
Dispenser needs, number of
non-compatible components,
location, labor price, regulations

The DoD applied an inflation factor of 2% per year to the average costs for both the “New tank” and the“Convert existing tank” scenarios from the table above to estimate the cost of deploying renewable fuelpumps at the remaining 76 Federal Fleet Fuel center locations dispensing more than 100,00 gallons of
16 Accessed 23 March 2023 - https://afdc.energy.gov/files/pdfs/42390.pdf.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

119

fuel per year. The table below provides a breakout of the factors that were incorporated into theestimates.

Scenario
New tank, new or retrofit
dispenser(s)Convert existing tank, new orretrofit dispenser(s)Cost
Mean: $71,735
Median: $59,153
Mean: $21,031
Median: $11,237

Inflation Factor~2%

Number of pumps
76 additional pumps

Total Cost
$7.48M~2%

76 additional pumps$2.19M

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22120

Appendix Q – Report on Electric Vehicle Infrastructure
RPT 117-35: SAC-M FY2022 committee reportElectric Vehicle Infrastructure
The Committee is encouraged by the administration’s plan to transition Federal vehicles, to include
DoD’s non-tactical vehicle fleet, to electric vehicles [EVs] over the next several years. The Committee
supports funding in the administration’s budget request for ERCIP planning and design funds to better
understand the unique capacity and infrastructure requirements of individual installations that areneeded to support an electric non-tactical vehicle fleet. The Committee further notes this planning isnecessary because the type of depot facility and charging infrastructure needed to support this transition
across the DoD enterprise is inadequate. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense tosubmit a report no later than 180 days after enactment of this act outlining the military construction
resources and authorities needed to support a transition to EVs. This report should include a strategy
and implementation plan, to include the electric charging and depot facility infrastructure requirements,
to transition the Department-wide non-tactical vehicle fleet to EVs.
The Department of Defense (DoD) established a Zero-Emission Fleet Strategic Plan in FY22 toaggressively pursue zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) acquisition, and utilize DoD appropriated funds, other
Federal agency funding as made available, and alternative financing avenues for both ZEV and electricvehicle support equipment (EVSE) acquisition. This strategic plan is informed by Title 10 and Executive
Order (EO) 14057 requirements to increase the resilience of DoD installations and supporting
infrastructure for mission assurance, increase use of carbon pollution-free electricity, reduce greenhousegas emissions from the non-tactical vehicle (NTV) fleet, and adapt to the automotive industry’s plans tophase-out of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. The Zero-Emission Fleet Strategic Plan wasprovided to the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and can be provided to Congressupon request.
The DoD will utilize the following authorities and contract options to support the transition to ZEVs andsupport EVSE deployment:
Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) – Title 42 U.S.C. § 8287
Utility Energy Service Contracts (UESCs) – Title 10 U.S.C. § 2913(d)GSA's Utility Area-Wide Contracts – by leveraging area-wide contracts managed by GSA theDoD can partner with other Federal agencies to bundle EVSE acquisition• Modify existing DoD Utilities Privatization Contracts• Pursue Charging as a Service (CaaS) Contracts – the DoD will work with industry leaders to
deploy an off-the-shelf solution for charging at installations• Pursue EVSE Acquisition Pilot Projects through the Defense Innovation Unit
• State Grant Programs (e.g., California Energy Commission) – DoD will work with state agencies
that have programs in place to support ZEV deployment to achieve state and local level goals
The DoD plans to acquire between 4,000 and 9,000 ZEVs per year over the next 10 years, as well as
EVSE to support adequate ZEV charging needs. The military construction resources needed tosuccessfully transition the NTV fleet to EVs will vary by location and date, as cost fluctuations related tomaterials, labor, permitting, vehicle availability, and charger availability will continue to occur
throughout the deployment effort. The DoD’s NTV fleet is large and has a diverse set of requirements.
•••

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

121

The Zero-Emission Fleet Strategic Plan will:
1. Optimize existing chargers by deploying ZEVs where chargers already exist
2. Use portable chargers as a bridge to fill charging infrastructure gaps in coverage
3. Use authorities like Area-Wide Contracts, Privatized Utilities, and energy savings performance
contracts (ESPCs) to leverage private capital
4. Use operations and maintenance funding to install make-ready infrastructure
5. Consider “Charging as a Service” opportunities to place chargers on top of “make-ready”
infrastructure
6. Use MILCON authorities to make investments in infrastructure to accommodate higher
penetration of ZEVs
The DoD has completed a general estimate of charging infrastructure below but acknowledges that sitespecific estimates will be necessary as EV infrastructure is deployed. Given unpredictable external
factors in the banking sector and the marketplace more broadly, DoD’s estimated budget requirement
provides a current snapshot that will likely change.
Total planned investment in ZEVs and EVSE for FY23 ($M)

ZEV
EVSE

Army

Navy

USMC

DAF

$34.1
$57.0

$3.1
$5.1

$2.48
$2.45

$15.4
$15.2

DefenseAgencies
$10.0
$0.5

The cost of installing EV charging stations or EVSE varies depending on the mission use case, the type of
charging station and the extent of construction required. Across all federal agencies from FY20-FY22,
the average reported cost of Level 2 charging ports (most common at DoD sites) including theirassociated equipment and installation costs was $9,412 per charging port. This includes distribution
system upgrades, which are typically limited to transformer replacements and service-side upgrades forLevel 2 EVSE.
The National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) estimated DCFC unit costs plus installation range from
$40K for a 50kW charging port up to $224K for a 150kW port. 17 Utility upgrade costs are paid for an
entire site and depend on the number of ports being installed at the site.
The DoD’s EVSE plan focuses on installation of Level 2 chargers in the early years since charging will
mainly be needed for light-duty vehicles that will charge overnight or during non-work hours. Some
DCFCs may be needed later as medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and vehicles with more frequentcharging requirements begin to enter the fleet.
The DoD estimates declining incremental costs (the difference in purchase price between EVs and ICE
vehicles) as more EVs and associated infrastructure are brought to market by manufacturers. DoD EV
acquisitions in FY23 will be nearly 100% light-duty vehicles. Many light-duty EVs are already cheaper
to use and maintain than ICE counterparts and the total cost of ownership (TCO) for EVs is forecasted to

17 National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Bennett et al. “Estimating the Breakeven Cost of

Delivered Electricity to Charge Class 8 Electric Tractors.” https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/82092.pdf

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

122

continue dropping in the coming years. For the DoD to capitalize on such TCO savings, it must invest in
EV charging infrastructure.
Further detail regarding an implementation plan for acquisition and deployment of EVs, including
infrastructure, within DoD can be found in the report responding to FY22 NDAA Section 328 and madeavailable upon request.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

123

Appendix R - Report on Maintenance of Current Analytical
Tools in Evaluating Energy Resilience Measures
Public Law 117-81: The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022
SEC. 314. Maintenance of Current Analytical Tools in Evaluating Energy Resilience Measures(b) REPORTING REQUIREMENT. —If amounts are appropriated to carry out the requirements under subsection(i) of section 2911 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), not later than September 30, 2022, theSecretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House ofRepresentatives a report on the execution by the Secretary of such requirements.

As directed in Section 2911 of Title 10, United States Code, the of Department of Defense (DoD)
developed and instituted a process to ensure that, when evaluating energy resilience measures, mission
owners and installations use analytical tools that are accurate and effective in projecting the costs andperformance of such measures. The DoD executes this process through the required use of the Energy
Resilience Assessment (ERA) Tool for all Energy Resilience Conservation Investment Program projects
that are adding new energy generation or storage technologies.
Developed in partnership with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory (MIT LL),
the ERA Tool provides a comparison of lifecycle costs and energy reliability for a variety of energy
generation and storage technology combinations. The Tool helps to answer high level questions
surrounding whether it makes more sense to import or generate electricity to a mission, if centralized
generation with a microgrid is more effective than building level generation, which solutions have thelowest lifecycle costs, and what technology combinations provide the best mission availability. While
the ERA Tool does not provide a full system design for the installation, it instead provides simulated
model results and recommendations for the types of architectures a mission owner can most costeffectively pursue to enhance their energy resilience posture.
The ERA Tool is designed to provide an accurate projection of the costs and performance of the energy
resilience measures being analyzed for potential use by a critical mission owner or installation. The Toolcan be used without specialized training, but the Department has offered tool tutorials and training atseveral large forums, as well as upon request from the Military Departments. After users provide input,
the Tool produces resulting data that is understandable and usable by the typical source selection official
and is consistent with standards and analytical tools commonly applied by the Department of Energy andby commercial industry.
Because the ERA Tool is presently managed through a partnership between ODASD(E&ER) and MIT
LL, it is adaptable to accommodate a rapidly changing technological environment. It is also peer
reviewed for quality and precision and measured against the highest level of development for such tools
by the responsible DoD and MIT LL teams. Inputs to the assumptions used in the ERA Tool are
reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis, not less frequently than once every three years. Moving
forward, the Department will continue to assess the appropriate time of use for the ERA Tool, withpossible placement in offices more responsible for energy project planning and development, rather than
execution.

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

124

Appendix S - Report on Energy Conservation Measures at
Installations
House Report 117-397, accompanying H.R. 7776, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2023
Energy Conservation Measures at Installations (p.82)
The committee commends the military departments on the use of energy savings performance contracts toimprove energy resilience, decrease energy costs, and increase readiness at military installations. The
committee notes that installation commanders and base personnel identify energy saving initiatives on
their energy conservation measures list and that these projects could in turn become part of an energy
savings performance contract. The committee is concerned that without a mechanism for sharing thecontents of the energy conservation measures list with energy service companies, the Department of
Defense is not able to utilize energy savings performance contracts to the fullest extent possible.
Therefore, the committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment toinitiate a study and submit a report to the House Committee on Armed Services by January 1, 2023, on
potential methods of securely sharing installation energy conservation measures requirements lists withexisting Department energy services companies.
As noted in the National Defense Strategy (NDS) the Department depends on energy-resilient forces,
weapon systems, installations, and infrastructure to achieve its missions, at home and abroad. To build
enduring advantages, the Department is actively strengthening the resilience and adaptability of its
installations, using an all-hazards approach (climate, man-made, cyber, etc.)
The Department continues to make energy demand reduction a priority and is actively seeking to adopt
more efficient and clean-energy technologies. Initiatives that enhance efficiency can also create
warfighting advantage. For example, improving efficiency and deploying clean distributed generationand storage can strengthen the resilience of critical missions housed on military installations in the face of
extreme weather, cyber and even kinetic attacks impacting electric grids.
The Department utilizes climate informed master planning processes (i.e., Installation Climate Resilience
Plans (ICRP), Installation Master Plans, Installation Energy Plans, etc.) to identify critical energy
requirements, assess vulnerabilities and risks, and build energy resilience while achieving Federal
sustainability goals. Through the installation energy planning (IEP) process the Military Services
identify, prioritize and plan resilience and efficiency projects using both appropriated and third-party
authorities such as energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) and utility energy service contracts(UESCs).
The Department has the largest performance contracting portfolio in the federal government (over $5B).
As enabled by the Energy Act of 2020, EISA 2007, and EPACT 2005, DoD continues to appropriately
use performance contracts to bolster resilience and reduce energy intensity. From FY17 – FY22 theDepartment awarded more than $3.5B in performance contracts and is continuing at a strong pace.
Presently, the Department is evaluating ways to further leverage performance contracts to integrate withother portfolio initiatives. For example, DoD is planning to electrify buildings to meet the Federalbuilding performance standards (BPS) in new construction and existing buildings. Additionally, theAnnual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22

125

Department is analyzing its over 280,000 buildings portfolio for opportunities for deep energy retrofits tobolster efficiency in furtherance of resilience. The Department is also making progress in integrating theEnergy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program (ERCIP) with other third-party authorities, suchas ESPCs/UESCs, in order to achieve holistic outcomes.
The Military Services continue to make progress in developing IEPs for all of their installations. IEPs
document critical loads and in many cases develop holistic acquisition pathways to address identified
gaps. Each Service executes this process slightly differently to address the unique requirements of theirorganization. For example, certain Services follow a more centralized approach in prioritizing projects
while other Services follow a more decentralized framework. A Service’s executable list of projects may
reside at different organizational echelons (i.e., installation, region, headquarters, etc.). Additionally, as
IEP projects address critical loads they must be handled securely and are subject to the information
security requirements of the individual Services.
Through multiple internal working groups, the Department is reviewing potential approaches to better
communicate its energy requirements to industry vendors, including energy service companies (ESCOs).
In advancing this issue, the Department is cognizant of its responsibilities under federal acquisition rules
and operational security requirements. IEP solutions utilizing performance contracting are currently
publicized through the traditional contracting channels (i.e., DoE FEMP, Army Corps of Engineers).
Additionally, the Department communicates its program requirements regularly with the ESCO
community throughout the calendar year through key forums such as the National Association of Energy
Service Companies (NAESCO) Federal Market Workshop, Energy Exchange, Association of Defense
Communities, Department of Navy ESPC forum, Department of Army ESPC forum, and Federal Utility
Partnership Working Group (FUPWG).

Annual Energy Performance, Resilience, and Readiness Report FY22126