2017. 1st. November
Yudhi Pramudya

THE GIANT SEWAGE (PROS AND CONS)
This is the latest paper, quite recently, in 2016. About the numericalsimulation of nitrogen waste released by 13 rivers into the Jakarta Bay,
which accumulates due to reclamation and the Giant Sea Wall Projrct
between Indonesi and China Government.
Peer-reviewed journal. International. Published by Elsevier. Written by theGerman Caucasians and his friends, van der Wulp.
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Master Plan Jakarta, Indonesia: The Giant Seawall and the need forstructural treatment of municipal waste water
Simon A. van der Wulp a, ⁎, Larissa Dsikowitzky b, Karl Jürgen Hesse a,Jan Schwarzbauer
Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.048
RESULT OF CALCULATION AND SIMULATIONThis part is the summary of the important part of the article.
In the simulation there are 4 conditions, namely:(a) without reclamation and GSW(b) phase A, when reclaimed islands are built(c) when the Giant Sea Wall is built, and the western reservoir is closed(d) when the east reservoir is closed
Measured is the content of nitrogen, phosphorus, and DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide, a molecular tracer for municipal waste water).
The result? View your own pictures. The more red the color, the greater thecontent. Red, is not it? That means it's already very far above the threshold.

2017. 1st. November
Yudhi Pramudya

As a result?
The more waste content above, it will appear disaster ... algae blooms ...
Water so green, full of algae, dead fish, odor water .. just sewage in large

2017. 1st. November
Yudhi Pramudyaquantity. But this is a giant (reservoir of sewage).

It happens if the waste from the river is not processed properly before.
However, according to the paper, the most sophisticated waste treatment
techniques are the state of the art, only 80% efficiency.
Meaning? Waste still passes to the bay, accumulates. And because it can
not get out of the GSW with super big speed, it will continue to grow andcontinue. And will still increase the content of the objects above.
If it were so, the 170 trillion contribution to Jakarta`s Government funding
is meaningless. The cost of operational, cleaning, maintenance, notincluding loss of ecosystem, fisherman, economy, etc .. more over big fromit. (see final image, from the NCICD concept, where water should bedischarged into the ocean using a giant pump, but the water inside theGSW is not washed)2017. 1st. November
Yudhi Pramudya

CONCLUSION
We want to take this risk? Who is the loss? Who is take benefit?
OTHER SOLUTIONS WHAT?
The least risk is condition (a), without reclamation and without GSW. But
Jakarta is going down the land? What's the solution?
Condition (a) selected, by installing a dike along the coast.
THE CONCEPT OF NCICD (National Capital Integrated CoastalDevelopment
The image 1 include at the end is from the NCICD concept.
It appears that the water inside the GSW (outer seawall), is actually dirty
water from the exhaust of 13 rivers. This water is not washed. If without
GSW, naturally water is washed by ocean currents, so naturally it will beclean. The dirty water grew continuously, causing the bay of Jakarta tobecome a giant sewage.
This is different from the concept of NCICD, which says that this water is'fresh water', a source of drinking water for residents of Jakarta. In contrast,
the above simulation results differ by 180 degrees with this NCICD claim,that this water has a remarkably high level of nitrogen , and DEET, above
the safe threshold. Instead of being a source of drinking water, instead
experiencing 'algae blooms', green smelly and deadly.
See also the giant pump that must throw water behind the GSW into theopen sea. if the pump dead, Jakarta will sink. If pumped up, the bay of
Jakarta will run out of water, so it becomes dry.
If the water is dry, Muara Karang power plant will die, lack of water, so it
must be moved.

2017. 1st. November
Yudhi Pramudya

Try to calculate how much money to pay for operating this GSW, and how
much is the loss caused?