IJERD – International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development (2014) 5-2

Research articleerd

Mega Construction in Panglao Island, Philippines: The
Magnitude of the Possible Biodiversity Losses
RUMILA C. BULLECER*
Bohol Island State University, Tagbilaran City, Philippines
Email: mslling@yahoo.com

TOMAS D. REYES JR.
Bohol Island State University, Tagbilaran City, Philippines

MARINA A. LABONITE
Bohol Island State University, Tagbilaran City, Philippines

REIZL P. JOSE
Bohol Island State University, Tagbilaran City, Philippines

NOEL T. LOMOSBOG
Bohol Island State University, Tagbilaran City, Philippines

EUNICE KENEE A. LABONITE
Bohol Island State University, Tagbilaran City, Philippines

AGUSTIN B. ANCOG
Bohol Island State University, Tagbilaran City, Philippines

JOSE T. TRAVERO
Bohol Island State University, Tagbilaran City, Philippines

BERNARDO A. BAUTISTA JR.
Bohol Island State University, Tagbilaran City, Philippines
Received 13 January 2014

Accepted 21 September 2014(*Corresponding Author)

Abstract To support the needs of the booming ecotourism of Bohol province, constructionof an international airport across four island villages was to commence in the latter part of2013. The mega structure would reduce into concrete some 233 hectares of natural habitatand displace its dependent fauna in the impact zones. A biodiversity assessment is one of
the requirements in securing the Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC). This study
primarily aimed to assess the biodiversity status in the site. Data were gathered throughfield surveys employing purposive sampling techniques. The global positioning system(GPS) device was used to get the exact location and elevation of the 350 floral plots andfaunal sampling stations. Faunal surveys involved mist-netting and light traps. Ecologicalparameters analyzed included species diversity, dominance and evenness. Floral results
yielded a total of 167 species of plants in 136 genera and 41 families in the project site.
Out of 167 plant species, 76 were trees species; 28 shrubs; 24 herbs; 18 grasses; 14 vines;
6 sedges and 1 fig species. Threatened species include Vitex parviflora and Diospyros
pilosanthera. Some 51 species of weeds belonging to 42 genera under 16 families wereidentified. Results showed a total of 26 avifauna species, 4 bats species and 6 anurans. Of
the 26 birds, 20 were endemics. The arthropods survey yielded a total of 84 insect species
in 14 Orders and 49 families. It was concluded that species diversity of both flora andfauna was moderate to high. There is an urgent need of an enrichment tree planting of
indigenous trees in the rest of the island to harbor the fauna that would soon be displaced
from the “wipeout zone”.
Ⓒ ISERD

137

IJERD – International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development (2014) 5-2

Keywords biodiversity, endemic, species diversity, species richness / evenness

INTRODUCTION
The Philippine Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) System requires projects to secure an
Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) prior to its implementation. It involves acomprehensive EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) that would assure the ecological feasibilityof the proposed project. Among the information needed are the biodiversity status of the area andthe realistic possible impacts of the proposed project to this natural life-support system.
Municipality of Panglao is composed of ten villages where four of these are part of theproposed 233-ha international airport. The proposed airport site has plain to slightly rolling
topography and is largely comprised of Maribojoc limestone, the youngest of the limestone units
found in the western area of Bohol. All sites have scrubland type of vegetation characterized withlow shrubs, mixed with grasses, herbs, and geophytes. The sites were a mixture of pioneer species
and remnants of advanced vegetation. The presence of so many stumps and the coppicing growthof trees/shrubs are evident of the massive cutting during the last decade and a half.
What would be the magnitude of the species and ecosystem biodiversity losses that will beaffected with the construction and ensuing operation of the new airport? More importantly, what
mitigating plans can be proposed to save the remnant species and their habitats?
OBJECTIVESThis study sought to determine the species composition and assess the diversity, dominance andstatus of flora and fauna of the proposed Bohol Airport Site in Panglao, Bohol which covers thefour villages of Bolod, Danao, Lourdes and Tawala; and to recommend several activities to beincluded in the environmental management plan of the proposed project.
METHODOLOGY
Flora: Purposive (preferential) sampling technique was employed to obtain quantitative
information on the structure and composition of terrestrial plants in the project area. Data collected
include plant species names, number of individuals and growth habit. Basal diameter, total height,
crown diameter, and the plant’s current stature were taken in plots established in scrubs andwooded areas
A total of 120 plots (with a dimension 10 m x 10 m each) were established along the proposed
runway across the 4 villages. These were laid mostly on dense scrub thickets where varied speciesof plants are evident. Some plots were also laid in areas with few scattered small trees and shrubs
to have a total picture of the whole area. A 1m x 1m subplot was also established within each plot
to assess the associated undergrowth plants.

Fig. 1 Sampling plots for higher vegetation

Fig. 2 Sampling plots for weeds assessmentⒸ ISERD

138

IJERD – International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development (2014) 5-2

Ecological parameters: Species dominance was determined by computing the species importancevalue (IV). Importance value considers, not only the density per unit area of a certain species ofplants like in the usual faunal assessment, but also includes frequency and cover/basal dominanceof all species recorded. It is the sum of the relative density, relative frequency and relative
dominance combined as one. The IV was derived using the following formulas:
𝐷𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 =𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑑(1)

𝐷𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐷𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 =× 100
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝐷𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 =𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠=
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑑
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑑

𝐷𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐷𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 =× 100
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑
𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 =× 100
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑡𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑
𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 =× 100
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦

𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 (𝐼𝑉) = 𝑅𝑒𝑙. 𝐷𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 + 𝑅𝑒𝑙. 𝐷𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 + 𝑅𝑒𝑙. 𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)

Indices of species diversity and dominance: Diversity indices were also determined using therichness and dominance computation following the formula of Magurran (1988). Richness
measures include Shannon diversity index (H’) and Evenness index (E). The former assumes that
individuals are randomly sampled from an indefinitely large population. It equally considers that all
species are represented in the sample. The latter is the ratio of observed diversity to maximum
diversity. Dominance measure, on the other hand, weighs towards the abundances of thecommonest species rather than providing a measure of species richness. This, in particular, iscomputed by the Simpson’s index (D). Simpson’s index gives the probability that any two
individuals drawn at random from an infinitely large community may belong to different species.
Species diversity (H’), evenness (E) and Simpson’s dominance (D) were assessed using thefollowing formulas:
𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 (𝐻′) = −  𝑝𝑖 (ln 𝑝𝑖)(8)where:𝐼𝑉 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑖 ==𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐼𝑉𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠

𝐸𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥 𝐸 = 𝐻′ / ln 𝑠(9)where: 𝑠 = 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝑆𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑠𝑜𝑛′𝑠 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥 𝐷 =  𝑝𝑖2(10)The species diversity index is the ratio between the number of species or importance values
that may be expressed as the number of individuals, biomass productivity and the like. A highindex value usually means a large number of rare species – “rare” in the sense that, it is represented
by a low number of individuals as opposed to high counts for a few common species.

Ⓒ ISERD139

IJERD – International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development (2014) 5-2

The index of dominance expresses the degree to which the dominance is concentrated in one,several, or many species (Odum, 1971). This is measured using several factors such as the numberof individuals, biomass, productivity and others.
Arthropods: The techniques employed in arthropod assessment were pan and light trapping.
Twenty-four (24) pan trapping sites were set for eight hours during the day while four lighttrapping sites at night in the four areas were laid out.
Table 1 Ordinal classification of species richness and dominance indices(adopted from Fernando, et al. 1998)
Relative Values
Very highHighModerateLow
Very low

Species Diversity
3.50 – 4.00
3.00 – 3.49
2.50 – 2.99
2.00 – 2.49
1.00 – 1.99

Evenness
0.75 – 1.00
0.50 – 0.74
0.25 – 0.49
0.15 – 0.240.05 – 0.14

Dominance
0.75 – 1.00
0.50 – 0.74
0.25 – 0.49
0.15 – 0.24
0.05 – 0.14

Agricultural crops: Most farms were given up or abandoned a decade ago when the lands wereexpropiated for the Project. A few remained and these were just listed and given a a cursory
inspection.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Flora
Floral results yielded a total of 167 species of plants belonging to 136 genera under 41 families inthe project site. The most represented families were Fabaceae, Poaceae, and Euphorbiaceae withmore than 10 species and genera. Out of 167 plant species, 76 were trees species; 28 shrubs; 24herbs; 18 grasses; 14 vines; 6 sedges and 1 strangling fig species. The shrub-layer contained 90
species of plants under 77 genera and 33 families while the undergrowth had 92 plants, belonging
to 78 genera and 31 families. Threatened species include Vitex parviflora and Diospyros
pilosanthera. Buchanania arborescens was found to be the most common in the shrub layer. Thiswas followed by Glochidion lutescens and Myrsine philippinensis, all are indicators of a karst
environment including Vitex parviflora. Chromolaena odorata and Imperata cylindrica were thecommon undergrowth species. Bambusa blumeana (kawayan-tinik) dominated based on its
cumulative basal diameter. Imperata cylindrica dominated the undergrowth. The diversity anddominance values in the shrub-layer showed a moderate to high species diversity. Its species
dominance was very low. The undergrowth had very high species diversity values andconsequently a low species dominance.
The implication of moderate and high species diversity and evenness in the shrub layer of thewooded thickets means that there were many species of plants recorded in the sampling plots. The
result of the analysis was expected since all types of plants (trees, shrubs, vines and herbs) werenoted as long as the shrub-layer minimum limit of 1 meter in height is met. Many literatures also
attested to the fact that early succession forests and scrubs similar with the wooded thickets in theproject area definitely have high species diversity and consequently have low species dominance.
The wooded thicket undergrowth also had very high species diversity and evenness values and lowspecies dominance value since most of the trees, shrubs and vines had dispersed their seeds which
now flourished in the floor in addition to several species of grasses and broadleaves which
normally grow under partial shade provided by the canopy of trees.
For the weeds, some 51 species belonging to 42 genera under 16 families were identified.
Family Poaceae (grass family) was the most represented group. Chrysopogon aciculatus(amorseko) was the most dominant weed followed by Imperata cylindrica. The mean diversity
value for weeds in the entire project site is moderate while evenness was high. On agriculturalcrops, a total number of 23 agricultural crop species belonging to 21 genera under 19 families wereⒸ ISERD140

IJERD – International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development (2014) 5-2

identified. The major agricultural crop species under cultivation were coconuts and bananas.
Coconuts, through copra sales, yielded the most family income among the crops grown. Thespecies diversity of the agricultural crops in the project site was very low due to a few species that
dominated in the count.
Fauna
Faunal survey results revealed a total of 26 avifauna species, 4 bats species and 6 anurans. It wasvery remarkable that out of the 26 birds, 20 were endemics. Distribution status was mostlyCommon. The most commonly bird species observed were Lonchura jagori and Aplonis
panayensis. The Lanius nasutus (Long-tailed Shrike) birds made an adaptation to the degradedenvironment by like building their nests on the ground grasses due to the absence of higher
vegetation. The bats were the only conspicuous wildlife mammals in the area. The degraded
vegetation and habitat conditions could not support the presence of other mammals like monkeys,tarsiers, civet cats, flying lemurs and squirrels. All the six anuran species identified were under thestatus of Least Concern based on the IUCN status list. Two were endemics. A land crab underfamily Gecarcinidae was encountered during the search for anurans in Barangay Bolod.
Anurans: All the six (6) species caught in the entire study area are under the status of Least
Concern based on the IUCN status list. However, Limnonectes leytensis is one of the two endemicanurans which usually thrive in a good habitat like forests with water bodies. The other endemic
species, Kaloula picta, is commonly found in cultivated agricultural lands. Although the species
had the highest number of capture, still, the figure did not indicate a good population of the sites.
Avifauna: Out of the 26 species identified, it was very remarkable that 20 were endemics whichsuggest an urgent need for conservation through habitat rehabilitation. The most commonly birdspecies observed were Lonchura jagori and Aplonis panayensis which are commonly known tothrive in marginal areas like the scrubby study sites. There were endemics like Lanius nasutus(Long-tailed Shrike) species which were also common and had made peculiar adaptations likebuilding their nests on the ground grasses due to the absence of higher vegetation.
Mammals: Only bats were conspicuous in the area. The kind of existing vegetation could notsupport the presence of other mammals like monkeys, tarsiers, civet cats, flying lemurs andsquirrels. Out of the four (4) fruit bat species captured, two were endemics. Cynopterus brachyotis,
a Widespread species and most commonly caught, is believed to mainly roost in or near the study
sites. This was evident with the observed “leaf-tent” formation that served as roosting place. There
were insect bats in the area but were not captured due to their ability to echolocate and easily evadethe mist nets. The bats need higher vegetation for roosting and food source.
Arthropods: The arthropods survey yielded the following data: a total of 84 insect species
belonging o 14 Orders and 49 families; 6 arachnids belonging to 1 order (Araneae) and 6 families;
and 1 Diplopod were positively identified. Identification is still to be made with 17 insects and 3arachnids. The diversity, evenness and dominance varied with different sites from very low to low.
However, for nocturnal arthropods, 3 of the 4 sites had high diversity. The dominant species in allsites were the Hymenopterous insects which include the ants, wasps and the bees which mostly
useful as pollinators, predators, decomposers, parasites and predators of insect pests.
CONCLUSION
From the results, it was concluded that species diversity was moderate to high in terms of higher
vegetation (trees and shrubs), undergrowth and weeds. Buchanania arborescens dominated thescrubby layer while Chromolaena odorata and Chrysopogon aciculatus dominated the weeds.
Arthropods’ diversity varied from low to very low in the sites. Avifauna or birds dominated thefaunal component. Species diversity was low among the birds, anurans and bats, but there was highendemicity among the birds. Of the arthropods dominant species in all sites were theHymenopterous insects which include the ants, wasps and the bees which are important pollinators.
Coconuts and bananas dominated the plantation and agricultural crops.
Ⓒ ISERD141

IJERD – International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development (2014) 5-2

RECOMMENDATIONSThere should be an enrichment planting of high vegetation (trees) and shrubs to cover theinevitable losses of species and species populations during the airport development. Other
indigenous tree species endemic to the island should be planted to save the affected faunal species
which are in dire need of food sources and roosting places. Dipterocarps which are native to theisland-province like narig, white lauan, apitong, yakal, manggachapui, manggasinoro, palosapis
and mayapis can be used. These are already known to thrive in open plantations in the island like inthe neighboring town of Dauis, as well as tree endemics like bagalunga, dao, kalumpit, bitanghol,aniam-gubat and many others can be used too. For food sources, in addition to the existing shrubs,
fruit trees like antipolo, breadfruit (kolo), mangoes, Ficus spp. (balete), manzanitas and others canalso be planted. The existing molave and sineguelas should be sustained. A minimum of a 20-m
wide tall vegetation (with dense crowns) should be established as noise barrier in the immediate
periphery of the airport.
Special conservation sites and/or wildlife sanctuaries maybe established away from thenoisiest part of the airport. Furthermore, the people particularly the farmers as well as thetechnicians of the municipality should be ready to understand and prepare for the massive transfer
or swarm of the arthropods to the different routes which may include their farms. Conservation andutilization of the plant species already growing in the area like bignay, molave, pandakaki andmore should be considered to make sure that the food and host plants will still be available andaccessible to the species. These plant species can be used in the avenue planting along the road
network within the Panglao island like “bignay boulevard” , “molave avenue” or pandakaki grove”.
The municipal local government unit s of Panaglao and Dauis through their respective Municipal
Agriculture Office should prepare a pest management plan for the island a year ahead of the New
Airport project implementation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This Project was commissioned by the national government of the Philippines to the University
through the provincial government of Bohol and was funded by the Japan International
Cooperating Agency (JICA).
REFERENCES
Alcala, A.C. and Brown W.C. 1987. Notes on the microhabitat of the Philippines discoglossid frog
Barbourula busuangensis. Siliman Journal, 34, 12-17.
Blum, M.S. 1985. Fundamentals of insect physiology. Wiley- Interscience. New York. USA.
Fernando, E.S., Sun, B.Y., Suh, M.H., Kong, H.Y. and Koh., K. S. 2005. Flowering plants and ferns of Mt.
Makiling. ASEAN-Korea Environmental Cooperation Unit.
Fernando, E.S., Balatibat, J.B., Peras, J.R., Jumawid, R.J.J., Benavente Jr., A.B., Bautista, R.R. and delaCruz, S. 1998. Resource inventory and assessment of biodiversity in the Subic Bay Metropolitan
Authority (SBMA): Terminal Report.
Gabriel, B. Insect pests of field corn in the Philippines. Laguna: DAC, UPLB, undated.
IUCN 2010. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2010.4.
Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NewJersey.
Reyes, T.D.Jr. 2006. Plant-environment relations in the Philippine tarsier habitats and territories.
Unpublished Masteral Thesis. Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Rojo, J.P. 1999. Revised lexicon of Philippine trees. Forest Products Research and Development Institute.
Department of Science and Technology. College, Laguna.
Soil and Water Conservation Foundation (SWCF). 2007. Annual report on flora and fauna field survey.
Bohol, Philippines.

Ⓒ ISERD

142