数理解析研究所講究録 1215 巻 2001 年 210-231

210
Basic theoretical outlook about recapitalizationof rapid growth private companies
toward autogenious order societies developing
countries.
〜Several Fundamentals about principal’s decision making
models about recapitalization studies〜

Akihiko Henmi
Marketing Grand Design Laboratory Inc.
7-16-12 YS build.3F Nishi-Shinjuku Shinjuku-ku Tokyo
1600023 Japan.
faridatky@hotmail. com
January.31.2001.

Abstract
In this paper Iintended to describe some introduction scopes and scalable
biographical categories about advocacy overlap layerd structurism
studies of developing countries.Usually, advocacy studies belongs topolitical processsocial structurism sociology studies.But on
the contrary recapitalization mearsurement econometrical studies haveserious standstills about mearsurabilities of medium security agent based
market research problems which consists of non observate issues ofdeveloping countries especially in the domestic geometric markets,
are circumstances of indutriarized metropolitans
informalof developing countries.Usually, definitions of informal sectors consists incannot get correct
small business agent based concepts,anddue deligent management informations about recapitalization
management decisions .Especially, for IPO phased rapid growthcompanies, there always have serious antinomy between business wide
broard scoping visions and inferiority of informations about
recapitalization management decisions. And oftenly, these antinomy
causes to build huge capital rents of IPO’s capital gains.Under thesebackward viewpoints ,as one sort of fronteer management accounting
structure studies,I intend to describe measurment equations andmeasurment fundamental econometrics theorems in order to makemanagement
observate advocacy specificated overlap layered
accounting structure$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$211Introduction
This study intends and aims about measurabiltles of manegement
accounting structures includes finance portoforio accounting structures and outward
example incdancial geometrical informal
manegement accounting. standing traditional statisticalsectors economic area’s description versus
have several difficulties about recapitalizations management
decisions of private forein companies.In this study Iintended to legitimate private
foreign companies into rapid growth IPO phased companies.And Itry to describe
principal decision making using several sorts of legal sociology studies and top
management basiness administration studies.Generaly measurability manegement
accounting structures
almost all very vital influences under agent
unti harmonized recognition
theories of business administration
theories.about cooperaate governance communication studies.
This study consists in several main constitution
one isendowsment due dehgent economic models and model definition studies
aboutconsohdational network structual model of domestic national market
models,developing
sectors.
capitals developing countries still remain
And in this firstin the positions of minority
the viewpoints of stakeholder conditions ofprivate companies which make management decisions about recapitalzation todeveloping countries.And therefore in theseis under conditions ofCommercal Code based Jurisprudences of minority principals.In this study, Itry torefer Commercal Code and Labour Law based Jurisprudences of minority principals
as Jurisprudence based endowsment studies and endowsment RBF network
replicable studies.
Nothing to say, these arguement structures depend on several sub categolzed
biographical preceding studies, for examples ,Advocacy social policymaking
studies lJce
structurism studies like P.A.Sabatiertransagent studies. And
structurism
biographical preceding studies to thesestudies, I try to refer
Rawls[5], Dewei[6], Brudoueu[7], Personstsj, Sapiap]. Saussureand other circumference studies.This recapitalzation measurability study aimes tobuild some inspiracies between backward biographical preceding studies,fundamental Advocacy social pohcymaking structurism studies, transnationalzm
studies and econometrical fundamental measurability studies.
In these advanced arguements, Itry to make introduction dueviewpoints ofbraking down due deligent measurabile studies of recapitalization managementadministration decisions.
$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}$$\mathrm{a}.\mathrm{g}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$$[\mathrm{i}],\mathrm{N}.\mathrm{W}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s}.[2],\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{m}$$\mathrm{T}.\mathrm{R}.\mathrm{K}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}[3],\mathrm{K}.\mathrm{E}.\mathrm{W}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{k}’\mathrm{s}[4]\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}1$$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{b}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{h}.\mathrm{z}\mathrm{m},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{J}$$[10\mathrm{b}$212
For Jurisprudence rules about transfer management resources fromforeign economic geometrical markets to domestic markets developing
external
must refer internal variable studies about peculiar introduction
variables of Jurisprudence structures, iusing some speculate biographical preceding], and Hart[12].
ofJurisprudencestudies,
And for the arguements of minority
cipalJurisprudence studies.And
We must refer as typical Jurisprudence
inconvolusion
measurement equation
should try to refer Olson’s problems as collective action theorems.
measurability study about
And almost needless to say torecapitalizations should be argued by the viewpoints of endowsment Jurisprudence
study for example Wendt[is].
And anotherof informal sectors developing countries
should be argued in this paper.Another objective theme of this paper is arguements ofhypothesis of reenginieering of labour and consumer markets of informal sectors
developing countries.This hypothesical theme of this paper should depends on
econometrics fundamental studies mainly.In
mathmatical sociologicalthisintend to due this viewpoint to biographicals labour economic BaysianOverlap Layered Multimodel lke Douglas and other very traditionalvariable non linier regression model studies also very traditional studies, and also,
fundamental Neural Network Models.These biographical selection shows that
this study depend on fundamental interdiciplinary lnkages between econometrics
study
arguements and other fundamental deciplnary structures.And
aims at giving fundamental viewpoint models about building measurable advocacy
social structure models for recapitalization management administration
structure model building has remarkable viewpoints todecisions.And
developing
informal sector measurable advocacy social structure model
structual advocacy social model would be able tostudies.And
progress integral social structual advocacy social semantics model of developing
countrie’s informal sector societies.
$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{W}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{F}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g},\mathrm{L}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}(\mathrm{i}\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\dot{\mathrm{m}}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{M}$$\mathrm{E}$$\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{g}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d},\mathrm{b}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{I}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{R}\mathrm{B}\mathrm{F}$$\mathrm{o}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}’\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{s}$1. Biographicals of General Broad Models about
Principal study of IPO phased companies.
decisions of IPO phased companies about multinational
recapitalization tend to depend on hidden management knowledges of founders
almost always have characteristic difficulties to monetary intermediacy.
Generally, flow model based finance motivation stands under economic conditions ofmacro finance information which is prepared for recapitalzation management
synmetrical specification of information anddecisions.And in thisinternal agent confidential capitals are restricted by economic conditions of macro$\mathrm{U}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{E}\mathrm{O},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$213
is very clear that hosehold
finance information.For example
economy and social capital resumes should be included in finance restriction
cercularfLows should be consisted in the contexts ofdefinitions.And
utilize values of cashflows demands.And also,finance restriction
economic models about
Hicks,Clower and Taisingiujand Robertsons[15]finance restriction definitions have vital specifications as Finance Motivations.And
Restriction opposed against time seriesalso Robertsons says
multiplicated effects which are build practical cashflows.In these contexts about
should be argued under conditions of building
Finance Restriction
multi dimentional character equations which have parrarell conditions to time$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}^{-}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}$$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{F}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{D}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$discount cashflow values.
As Sammuelson and Striker[i6]says and refer in their biographicals, For
independent divergence analysis about product equations restricted by geometricalmodelsmodels. These
need convolusional overlap layerd
should be constructed based maximize utilze equational theorems for householdalso these agent models should be convoluted labour
economy agent
contract models which includes vital conditions of restriction equations of producttechnological restriction, time discount values restriction, fiscal pohcy restriction,$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{M}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{M}$$\mathrm{E}$$\mathrm{E}$$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{W}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$geometrical discount restriction.
And along these equational preconditions of recapitalization
are following vital issues about recapitalzation renmas.One ofother,Agentthese were Nominal and Substantial Labour Supply
Organization Proplem and Controll Based Committment Problem.Nominal andSubstantial Labour Supply Problem shows that there is fundamentally no functions
between disguised umemployment labour fource and spreads between nominal andNurksesubstantial labour supply fource.Disguised umemployment labourshows[n] fundamentally have no lnkages between geometrical specfication functions
and nominal and substantial labour supply functions. In anotherproblems about labour supply functions’ measurabilty still remain under conditionof adopting geometrical specfication functions. But still remaining conditions offunctions about informal
disguised unemployment labour measurable
sectors developing countries take marginalze by geometrical specification
marginal
the network overlap models likeorganization agent models.
organization proplem and control based
And another point ofcommitment problem are described as follows.
Productivity estimation studies about management decision of private
some kind of overlap layered optimize structures productivity equation
model studies. Overlap layered optimize productivity models should be structured
getting optimize management conditions from estimation of structured optimize
management teams. For biographicals.Dess,Preim[i9] shows homogeniousity of$\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{w}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{S}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{L}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{L}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}.\iota 18[.\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}$$\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{w},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$214structured optimize management team members have high level correlation
between productivities of management decisions and homogeniousty of top
management teams.Andof internal communications of top management
teams contributed on correlations between productivities and management decisions
types.And in the context of recapitalization management decisions
is vital
key factors how reposition and estimate have had specific diversences very correlatewith membership structures.This viewpoints of specific diversences of management
decisions have been indicated by Hambrick and Mason’s biographicals.pojThese
academic view of management membership structures have important lnkages about
agent types analysis studies of advocacy overlap layered structures.In these studies of
agent types analysis
order to reflect and make conjunction torecapitalization studies and in
conjunction to geometrical non descreteclass structured semantic market fiame structures, there are some vital academic]
biographicals of thesesays that diversities of
network structures includes cooperate alliances and institutional mutual interactionsof joint management issues of network organizational structures.And in add,organizational class layered structures belonging with diversities of management
external conditions have some specifications of gradualy processing organizationalinnovations under management conditions of non descrete varriances.On thedescreate management conditions which have unti consecutive
decision making
alliance conditions of
between foreign private companies and under developing organizations developing
organizations private companies which should bestand undergradually processing organizational in0vati0n8 under management conditionsusually
have internal oriented learning specifications and tend to have impossibilities oflearning recapitalization conditions.
says also that recapitalzation decisions
Andother context
including capital retransfer
on not only contract strategies but alsoaIh.ance and cooperate informal organizational lnkages.
must notice that non descreate recapitalze medium
In thesestands understudies includes principal agents’ specificatedoverlayered and classiq structures ,and have variations along with principal
and also have specificated aliance semantic structures.But on thealso have dfferences between recapitalzation theoretical dividence
studies and typological agents types studies.And we shold build divergence advocacy
overlap layered developing country structures by dividencial typologies of agent types
which are made by aliance types and top management divergency types.
$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{T}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h},\iota 21\mathfrak{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{K}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}(22$$.\mathrm{T}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}$$\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}$$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}i\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{w}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{T}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$.

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s}’\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$2. Linkage Networks and Endowsment Types Studies
about IPO phased Rapid Growth Companies andRelativities against Structuralism Studies

215
of Informal Sectors Developing Countries haveserious confusisonal condititions in the viewpoints of recapitalzation measurable
studies.This confusional problems causes standing statistic designs of public
governmemts and statistical measurability of each smal businesss informalorganizations.Almost always these invisible conditions about definisions of informal
sectors developing countries causes flourish about implication anthoroplogical casestudies and business administrational organization case studies like N.Uphoff.But
anthoroplogical case studies and business administrationalorganization case studies only have second best academic inspiracy of econometricmeasure models and have no direct means of real statistic econometric analysis.
.
defines informal sectors small independent businessaround industrizational
agent.But almost all of developing
metropoltans have not fulfiled by smal independent business informal sector
independent business agents which haveagent.And in realfunctions of mutual support and subcontract to industrizational
due to own one part of geometrical economy surround to industrization
economy.Other parts of geometrical economy surrounds are one is poverty economic
another is some spcificate household like organizations whichclass
owe apparenticeships toward young labours who intend to work as metropolitan
industrial workers and some fews are intend to make small businesses informal
the viewpoint of recapitalization
sectors using
measurablity studies, informal sector’s diciplnes which due to labour contract based
agents, do not have sufficient accountabilities.We should define alternative scopes
about geometrical economy surround to industrization economy.And on thisand.jurisprudence
viewpoints we should use as semantic key
confonmity based restatement problems.
Endowsment policies of informal sectors should be stand as adhoc studies
which should be defined by jurisprudence conformity studies.Restatement problems
are measurability issues of practical conditionarity pohcies.And supplement policies
of practical laws depend on the activitiesof endowsment of transferable import laws.
According to minority stakeholders of IPO phased private company
buildings of international private
these contexts of practical laws’
onlaws depends on alternativities of juridical rights on national private
is said that
presupositions of national jurisdictions. And in anotherconjunction problems of proceeding laws between national and international private
laws is considered in the process of making superiorities of private company’s home
is said thatnation’s international endowsment laws.And also in one otherminority stakeholders of IPO phased private company agents due to social welfare
ohcy and conflict jurisprundences in the conditions of endowsment investment
businesses.These business endowsment conditions so called Forum Non Convenien ce$\mathrm{F}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{D}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{A}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n},\mathrm{A}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}[23]$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{s}.\mathrm{A}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{w}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$$\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$’$\mathrm{p}$216
Jurisprundences are stand as restrict conditions of domestic economic advocacy
structures.And in additions, in the conditions of recapitalizations of foreign privatecompany agentstit is important views of recapitalzations that accordance
jurisprundence structures which are instituted advocacy economic overlayerd
structures.And recapitalization capital gain of foreign private company agents should
be argued by dividencial study between dividend and shared business profits each ofthese should be gain directry from instituted advocacy economic overlayerd

structures.
And the latter point of views about observate synthesis studies of instituted
advocacy economic overlayerd
should make clear labour contract
models of . instituted
conditions and remodelng to make measure equation of
advocacy economic overlayerd structures.FundamentaIy,according to labour
management model
are vital points about utilty studies of domestic
private laws against powers of foreign mother countries’ endowsment internationallaws, and another vital viewpoints about endowsment jurisprundence studies arearguements about institutional ownerships and organizational governancemanagement studies.
problems about informal sectors especially of
management control structure problems which have beendeveloping
described, N.Uphoff, A.Sabatierformer have been
independence and incdance
conditions about social structures.These independence structure conditions fromexternal development policies, indecate structurabilty of Overlap layered external
and incdancial management accounting structures in the social conditions of medium
structures between industrialzation economy and agricultural economies lke
informal sectors.
And these measurabih.ties of Overlap layered external and incdancial
management accounting structures in the social conditions should be extended by the
Keohane and J.S.Nye.[24].8 biographicals.
former prestudies of R.
governments and national
According to R.Kappen’s trans international
governments of developing countries and other optimize independent agent factors
should have remarkable influences to transnational agents and sub public sectors
which usuauy do not have specificational public institutions.And R.O Keohane and
J.S.Nye says regitimate definitions about transnational agents for developing
tocountries as some domestic economic rational structures.And ininternational policy research studies, non governmental transnational agents should
overlap layered
have specificated semantic mutual relationships andstructures should be build up by means of common expectations which defines by
rati0naltie8 of agent activities ,and by objective management decisions of agent
activities.These arguement studies of agent activities and boundary structures
between transnational and domestic class structual advocacy structures also show
dimentional structual measurment equations should be build for econometric social$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{M}$$\mathrm{E}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{O}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{K}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n},\mathrm{R}.\mathrm{O}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\cdot \mathrm{g}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}$217measurment studies.
These arguements of agent activities and boundary structures between
transnational and domestic class structual advocacy structures ,there also could be
discovered in alternative contexts of sociological studies and structual
anthropological studies.For example, F.Boudieu says dynamic linkages between
agents and semantic variable spots in the viewpoints of structual social studies. And
P.V.Blache[25] indicates social structure descriptions about sf.flness of job selections
about traditional custom jurisprundence based societies.And as more microscopic
social structual studies, J.Dewey[26] indicated and suggested due deligent faculty
educational endowsment studies about agent management decisions of informal
sectors of developing countries.
Conjunctional studies between these sociological alternative studies andOverlap layered external and incdancial management accounting structures studies
of informal sectors of developing countries needs advanced discussions about, Iintend to make legitimate
replicabilty modelng studies.In thisstudies only excluded by structurism which are typicals in advocacy social structurestudies.
$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y}$stepping alternative structuralism modelingstudy about IPO phased private companies’
recapitalizations toward domestic markets developing$3.\ln$countries.

In thisshould observe and discuss due dehgence accounting
measurement fundamental viewpoints according to structuralsm studies.
Iintend to show three arguement points in this chapter.First point is neutralty
theorem about taxination pohcy endowsment elements. And the second point isprepearatory fundamental reviews about econometrics measuring equations which
are reversion structures of Cob Douglas productivity function equations.This$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$productivity function equation stand as afundamental condition equation of SME
models useful for measurment studies of Informal sectors developing countries.And
the third point of this chapter is necessity rules for measurment studies of Informal
sectors developing countries which are useful to power guided endowsment advocacy

model studies, which one is power selection based endowsment socio mathmaticalmodels and another is fundamental unit advocacy measurment econometrics modelstudies, household measurment fundamental reviews and also second another viewsof this chapter is some point of stochastic accounting measurable fundamental study
study have some aims to get fundamental measurment
reviews.Needless toperspectives for advocacy social structurism models.
former theoreticaltheorems of eachstudies biographical in this chapter are almost
biographical categories.In order to interact real society and real statistic conditions$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}$218
we should develop some biographicals in each statistic, stochastic, econometrics
academic conditions within frames of advocacy social structurism models studies.
In the viewpoints of neutralty theorem about taxination policy endowsment
should notice that general rules of taxination pohcies usually stands
outside of temporary poltical jurisprudences anddue deligent taxination
rules have been instituted under short time spread based economic polity decisions ofnational government of developing countries.Usually management decisions ofprivate companies developing countries should have management decision based
informations under conditions of minority stakeholders which have been situated tomajour stakeholders which intended to make recapitalzation to developing countries.
Capital alowance motivations of management decisions of minority stakeholders ofprivate companies developing countries alway\S should have be induced not by generalrules of taxination pohcies but by temporary political jurisprudences anddue deligent taxination rules.For
these introduced contexts, H.Hofeiither
and F.Schneider says advocacy structured based money hallucination theorems
according to taxination policies.H.Hofeiither and F.Schneider says that structured
money hallucination caused taxination policies should have depend on mainly
temporary politicaljurisprudences, and temporary taxination policies which have been
structured by itemized taxination laws.
These itemized taxination laws influences should be measured even in theconditions of advocacy structured measuring equations.In other
SME models about advocacy based recapitalization agent synthesis
taxination laws should be made as measurable equations.Fundamental theorem
stands as complexities of taxination policies as follows.
$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{w}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{D}\mathrm{R}\mathrm{T}\mathrm{t}=\mathrm{T}$A$\mathrm{D}\mathrm{R}\mathrm{T}t$A
AM$\mathrm{T}$$\mathrm{T}\mathrm{R}Y\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{T}\mathrm{R}Y\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{T}$$\mathrm{R}Y,$$+\mathrm{A}\mathrm{M}$$\mathrm{T}\mathrm{R}Y1$:Direct Tax loading: Avernage Tax Ratio per labour fee of Year.T.
: Marginal Tax Ratio per labour fee of Year.T$\mathrm{m}$$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$I$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{T}\mathrm{t}^{=}\mathrm{Z}$$(\mathrm{R}\mathrm{E}\mathrm{V}1’ )2+\mathrm{Z}$$‘=1$$\mathrm{V}$I$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{T}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{R}\mathrm{E}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{E}\mathrm{X}\mathrm{E}\mathrm{M}$$(\mathrm{E}\mathrm{X} \mathrm{E}\mathrm{M}_{1t})2$$j=1$:Complexity of Taxination:Sharing Ratio of Tax item under gross Taxination Recoops
of .Tax item8 of Year.T:
free item among Tax free items of Year.T$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{T}\dot{\mathrm{a}}$$\mathrm{x}$$\mathrm{j}$$\mathrm{n}$$1\iota$

Consequently these equational based complexities of taxination policies should
be structurized by sub measurable equations models.And these complexities equations
models should have build as the viewpoints of non descreate geodetic lne approval
which is useful to optimise endowsment geodetic lines such as Kullback Leibe$\mathrm{r}$219
diversence analysis.
And for second viewpoint of thismeasuring equations
which are reversion structures of Cob Douglas productivity function equations
should discuss measurabilties between productivities and labour equations
structures which are discussed as the conditions of SME models of developing
countries.Needless toare both marginal increase gradually and marginal
gradually productivities equations in advocacy developing countries.And
therefore equational discount function depend on measurable functions between non
descreate geometrical points which have been due to diverse productivities.
And because equational functions of geometrical econometrics fundamental
equational
studies ften due to the presupositions of Parate
functions studies should be discussed under extentions of optimize recapitalzation
studies qbout labour capitals and investment stakeholder capitals. So,through of thesestudies we should build some optimize models which can be accounted advocacy
overlap layered measurment structures.Fundamentally,advocacy measurment
models should be constituted semantic network lnkages and endowsment geodetic
functions and SME models for advocacy overlap layered measurment structures
shogld be structured by due lnkage factors of productivity function equations issues.
$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{C}\uparrow \mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{O}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$$\uparrow^{1}$t-l$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{F}Y$:$\cdot$$\mathrm{C}$$\mathrm{t}$: Consumption YearYear
t-l : income Year t-l.
(T) Household Utilty equation
Product Technology
equation at geometrical basic point(X,Y),$)\}$]( , y) }.
,
(X.
,
[
$Y$

$\mathrm{u}$$\mathrm{i}^{1}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}1\mathrm{e}$$|$$\mathrm{t}.Y$$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{t}$.

$\mathrm{R}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}:\mathrm{P}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$$\pi$$=\mathrm{P}\mathrm{q}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{L}$$\mathrm{L}\{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{L}$$\mathrm{K}\{\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{X}$$-\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{y}$$\mathrm{L}\mathrm{W}-\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{r}$Time Restriction Equation,1A$\mathrm{T}=\mathrm{T}+$Household Budjet Restriction Equation
$\pi$

But

$\mathrm{A}+\mathrm{t}1\mathrm{w}$$\mathrm{u}$A$\mathrm{t}$I$0\overline{rightarrow}|$( ):Utilty Equation( ) :Product equation at geometrical basic point$\cdot$$\cdot$$\mathrm{q}$( ),$\cdot$$\mathrm{q}\mathrm{L}$$\mathrm{L}$( )$\cdot$( )$\cdot$$\mathrm{q}\mathrm{k}$:( ) Diverce Differnential$\cdot$$\mathrm{q}$$\mathrm{E}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}$varinceLabour:Practical Labour Power per geometrical Unit. ,(X. y)
power
geometrical basic point:Equation about practical investment capital per geometrical( , y)
basic point. K.and geometrical unit
, y) :geometmrical factors about Labour Investment at$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{S}\iota$$\mathrm{K}(\cdot)|$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{L}$($\mathrm{X}$geometrical oint (X. y)(X. Y) :geometmrical factors about Capital Investment at$\mathrm{p}$$\mathrm{S}\kappa$$\mathrm{x}$geometrical point

Internal Variables
I:Real Income of househol$\mathrm{d}$

(X.

y)

$\mathrm{k}.\mathrm{L}$.

220$\mathrm{T}$$\pi$: Resume labour times: Real Income of Agricultual Product per geometrical Unit.

:Pretext labour Capital per geometrical Unit. Householdlabour capitals per geometrical Unit , Labour capitals
from labour markets per geometrical Unit
: Pretext investment capital per geometrical Unit.
External Variables: Product prices of agricultures: Agricultural wages per labour times: Capital costs :interest: Available times for hosehold
I : External income out of agricultures(X. y) :Double dimention index about productivity point
Subordinate functions for other productivity scheme( ) :Integnal
A:Planted arrange area for Productivity Equation
calcasus of non desreate equational modle of gross planted arrange area$\mathrm{t}\iota=\mathrm{t}\mathrm{t}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}$$\mathrm{Q}1$$\mathrm{h}$$\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{P}$$\mathrm{W}$$\mathrm{r}$$\mathrm{T}$$0$$\cdot$$\mathrm{q}$Thprefore these household utilty equations usually defines as subordinate
functions to Cob Douglas productivity equations.And as Steiner and Samuelson havefunctional equations do not include dfferential specifications about
not reflect dfferential conditions between
informal sector labour
functional equations
hired labour and independent household labour.And
stands independent observanced conditions of product geometrical points.And inratio of geometrical points are constant in all productivity points.
Differential definitions about labour productivities are able to be argued as$\mathrm{b}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{d},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}8\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{o}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}$follows, as the contexts of Steiner and Samuelsons.

Capital discount ratio: r.and Labour power discount ratio rare as follows in thecontext of geometrical discount ratios of Steiner and Samuelsons$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{q}\iota(\cdot)\underline{8\mathrm{L}}=\mathrm{w}$a$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{L}$$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{k}$$( \cdot)\frac{\partial \mathrm{K}}{\partial \mathrm{k}}=\mathrm{r}$but,’$0<< \frac{\partial \mathrm{K}}{\partial \mathrm{k}}1$$0<< \frac{\partial \mathrm{L}}{\partial \mathrm{t}\mathrm{L}}1$

utilitiesgradualy
the contexts of Cob Douglas
decrease markets of traditional agricultual productivities, marginal productivities
about investment capitals for productivity agents, have at least same or belows toward
discount ratio of different
productiyities of product points.And
product points are as follows according to Steiner and Samuelsons.
,$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{P}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$$\underline{8\mathrm{L}}<0$a8$\mathrm{L}$$\underline{8\mathrm{K}}<0$a$\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{e}$221$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{L}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{x}$.

$\mathrm{y}$),$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{k}$$(\mathrm{x}.

\mathrm{y})$:Specification productivity equation.But underconditions of pretext labour and capital

investment are const.
conditions of Parate
gradually decrease
conditions of productivities for investment
equation under
perfect contest household markets is follows$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}$$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$

$\pi$

[

$\mathrm{x}=\mathrm{P}\mathrm{q}$but$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{A}$$\mathrm{k}\mathrm{x}$[ 14,$\mathrm{L}$$\mathrm{K}\mathfrak{l}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{x}$.

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{k}$$(\mathrm{X},$$1$$\mathrm{y})$]$-\mathrm{t}$IL$\mathrm{W}-\mathrm{k}\mathrm{z}$$\mathrm{r}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{f}$productivity equation is under$\mathrm{q}\mathrm{L}$( ) $>0$$\cdot$$\mathrm{q}\mathrm{k}(\cdot)>0$$\underline{8\chi \mathrm{x}}=\mathrm{P}$aS(X. y) 1,: Optimise labour investment under parate equbrium: Optimise capital investment under parate equbrium
In theseand$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{L}$qL$(\cdot)\underline{8\mathrm{L}}<0$aS$\iota$$\iota$Thereforehousehold productivity equation is gradually decreasefunctions as geometrical unit productivity
marginal
alternativities between dfferent geometrical productivity points.
And
investment of different household productivity
equations are$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{L}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}$$\underline{8\mathrm{t}\mathrm{L}}=\underline{8\mathrm{L}}/\underline{\partial \mathrm{L}}<0$aSa$\iota$at$\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{L}}$$\mathrm{L}$These condition shows that household productivity equations are gradually
decrease functions even as household labour
also shows marginalalternativities between different geometrical productivity points.
And also P.Krugman ,to productivity transfer about informal
sectors ,adopting some market models of external non perfect and gradualy decrease
productivity models, shows economic equations models which contains industrial
and agricultual dual sectors as follows.But in the following
items and produtivity Cob Douglas equations are simmilar between industrial andagricultural sectors,$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\cdot \mathrm{g}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$$\mathrm{u}$.

$=\mathrm{C}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{C}u$A$1\cdot\mu$

1Industrial goods ratio of consumption$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{M}=[\mathrm{Z}$$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{i}^{(^{\sigma}\cdot 1\prime\sigma_{)]}}\mathrm{t}^{\sigma/\sigma_{-1)}}$$\mathrm{i}$And also,genuine agricultural productvity is constant for scales.
Aj
Aj
Aj :agricultural labours of constant for scales
0Aj :agricultural product of constant for scales
And according to industrial productvity is$=\mathrm{O}$$\mathrm{L}$$\llcorner$$\mathrm{L}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j}=\alpha$and1$+\beta 0\mathrm{M}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j}$$\mathrm{L}_{\mathrm{A}\mathrm{i}}=\phi$$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{L}_{\mathrm{M}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j}}=\mathrm{A}$$\mathrm{j}\mathrm{L}\mathrm{A}$$\mathrm{j}\mathrm{L}\mathrm{M}$And product transit equations are acconding to Samuelsons agricultural

222
product transit
and transit points andx.transit distance Djk. transit cost$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{j}$$[$$\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j}\iota=$$\tau$.

$\mathrm{e}(-\mathrm{r}\mathrm{D}\mathrm{j}\mathrm{k})1X\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j}\mathrm{k}$capital transfer can be supposed according to earlyAndindustrial labour capital dividences as follows.
Average substance labour wages are$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}$$\omega$$=\mathrm{Z}$$\mathrm{j}\lambda \mathrm{j}\omega$$\mathrm{j}$$(\omega \mathrm{j}-\omega)$$=\mathrm{p}\lambda_{\mathrm{i}}$$\underline{\mathrm{d}}\lambda\underline{\cdot}$$\mathrm{d}\mathrm{t}$In theseterm equibrium models should be described as themeasurement conditions of dynamic transfer of industrial resources.
Industrial prduct pricing model. ,Demand Elastic factor ,$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{P}$$\sigma$$\mathrm{j}$$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j}_{\frac{\sigma}{\sigma-1}}=\beta\omega$

In these cases, F.0.

$\mathrm{B}$pricing models which contains no transist costshows as follows.
$\underline{\sigma}\beta$$=1$$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{j}=\omega$$\mathrm{j}$$\sigma-1$

And
non profit productivities stand as gradually decrease
utilize equations along with agricultural gradually decrease utilze$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}$equations,0$\mathrm{M}\mathrm{j}=\underline{\mathrm{a}}(\sigma-1 )$$\beta$can describe specificate measurable equation model
which estimate prices and wages as agricultural commerce bases$(1 -\mu )\phi$A: Wage ratios of industrial labours
And inwe append c.i.f pricing models(transit price model
In this$Y\mathrm{i}=$but$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j}+\mu$$\mu$$\mathrm{j}\omega \mathrm{j}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}$product index.Tj
including insurance transit costs),place
Agricultual and Industrial wages
are following
$1/1$
[)
]
(
-or)
k.exp
A
$\mathrm{j}.,\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\omega$$\mathrm{k}$$\mathrm{T}\mathrm{j}=$$\omega$$\mathrm{k}1\omega$$\mathrm{j}$$(\mathrm{r}\mathrm{D}\mathrm{j}\mathrm{k})11-\sigma$$\mathrm{j}=[)\mathrm{k}Y\mathrm{k}\mathfrak{l}\mathrm{T}\mathrm{k}\cdot\exp(-\mathrm{r}\mathrm{D}\mathrm{j}\mathrm{k})1\sigma- 1](1/\mathrm{a})$but$\omega$$\mathrm{j}=\omega \mathrm{j}\mathrm{T}\mathrm{j}-\mu$

These short term equibrium model can be stand as fundamental equation
models which aim to recapitalization and recentralization of indnstrial
and agricultural productivities as follows.
$\omega$$\omega$$1=\mathrm{T}1=1$$2=$)
e-r $(\sigma- 1)/2\}+\{(1$[ $\{(1+\mu$ ) e-r $(\sigma- 1)/2\}+\{(1$[{(1 $+\mu$ )$=\mathrm{e}- \mathrm{r}u$but assume $\mu=0$ ,$-\mu$$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}(\sigma- 1)/2\}$$-\mu)\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}$]$(1/\mathrm{a})$$(\sigma- 1)/2\}$]$(1/\mathrm{a})$223$\omega$$2=[\{\mathrm{e}- \mathrm{r}(\sigma- 1)/2\}+\mathfrak{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}(\sigma- 1)/21]$$(1\mathit{1}\sigma)<1$

order to gain productive labours,
Because Jansen inequalty
we can observe that centlzations of industrial productive points cause
the process
decentlzations of agricultural productiveof centlzations of industrial productive points tend to induce
industrizations of informal sectors developing countries.
And
to productive lnkages of subcontract structures
between informal sectors and industrialized sectors ,labour power ,transit cost can be observed as follows.
$\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\cdot \mathrm{g}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\tau$$\mathrm{r}=0arrow\omega=1$$\mathrm{r}arrow 0arrow\underline{\partial\omega 2}=-\mu$aAnd,$\omega$$\sigma$

$=$

$\{$

e-r $(\sigma- 1)/21+\mathrm{f}(1$[ $\{(1+\mu)$ e-r $(\sigma- 1)/21+\{(1$[ $\{(1+\mu$ )$2=$$=\mathrm{e}- \mathrm{r}\mu$And$-\underline{\sigma-1}\mu<0$$\mathrm{r}$$-\mu)\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}$$-\mu$)$(\sigma- 1)/21$] $(1/\sigma)$] $(1/\sigma)$$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}(\sigma- 1)/2\}$[{( $1+\mu$ ) e-r(2 $\sigma- 1)/2\}+\{(1-\mu)\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\{(\sigma- 1)rightarrow\sigma\mu\}/2\}$] $(1/\sigma)$$(\sigma-1 )/\sigma 1>\mu$

vaviables.
is observed as adverse convex function to,and these
Therefore when is above
condition shows the impossibilty of product recentrization .
$[ (\sigma-1 )/\sigma]$ shows average product cost against to marginal
product cost. And
resiliences
stands adverse
correlation toward scalable economic perfomances.Informal sectors
which have high alternative resilences toward scalable
economic perfomances also have some sort of obstruct fupctionsof capital accumlation.
continuity between
Krugman’s
These
agricultual societies and industrizational societies. And also we must observe inthese
sort of optimize models of endowsment renma models which should
one sort of due process
be observed in the advocacy overlap layered
productivity models should bemodels of social industrialzation. And in
stand as approval conditions about endowsmeut investment studies of advocacy
overlap layered structures informal sectors developing countries.
so,$\omega$$2$$\tau$$\tau$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t},\omega$$2\geqq 1$$\sigma$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$And the third point of views about accounted advocacy overlap layered
measurment
selection based endowsment socio mathmatical models
and another is fundamental unit advocacy measurment econometrics modelin the interdiciplinary field between political advocacy social studies
and measurable statistical studies.
point of views about accounted advocacy overlap layered
measurment
some studies in politics biographical issues.And
alternative categohes of these point of views consists in sociological studies of$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{U}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}$224developing countries.In this studies Iintend to show external factors and restraints
factors and introduced factors of endowsment powers about advocacy overlap layered
intend to describe some sort of anticipate theorems
structures.And in theseabout advocacy overlap layered structures.
$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{I}$Brams and Wittman says according to endowsment institutional elementsof advocacy overlap layered
should be linage structures models whichshould be constructed by external social elements and restrical power elements andintroducing power elements and other mathmatical models.
When social condition . agent is suffered powers by agent 1,
And when:We can define that agent
is suffered restrained powers by agent: Direct Rationalty of agent Iwhen agent \ddagger is given.
But:Medium Rationality of agent when agent is given.
$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{P}$$\forall \mathrm{x}\in \mathrm{C}\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{X})\mathrm{i}((\mathrm{P}))$.

$\forall \mathrm{y}\in \mathrm{C}’\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p} )$$(\mathrm{X}, \mathrm{y})\in \mathrm{P}(\mathrm{R}\mathrm{i})$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{J}$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{X})\mathrm{i}((\mathrm{P}))$$(\mathrm{p} )$$\mathrm{C}’\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{J}$agent is suffered powers by agent
And when social condition,
And when: ( , y)We can define that agent is suffered medium powers by agent
these powerof agent selections andAnd
fundamentals of powers should be structured multiple layered.
shows perspectives of agent to agent , and in these conditions
decision functions of agent which shows sellections of agent
is as follows.
:which indicates sellection condition of agent is
In these$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{p}$$\forall \mathrm{x}\in \mathrm{C}\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{X})\mathrm{i}((\mathrm{P}))$$\forall \mathrm{y}\in \mathrm{C}’\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p} )$$\mathrm{x}$$\in \mathrm{P}(\mathrm{R}\mathrm{i})$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{X}\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}.\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}$$(\mathrm{f})$$\mathrm{f}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}’\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p})=1$ $\mathrm{x}|\exists \mathrm{q}\in \mathrm{X})\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p} )$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{x}\in \mathrm{e}\mathrm{X}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p})$$\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{C}\mathrm{j}(\mathrm{X})\mathrm{j}(\mathrm{q})))\}$$\mathrm{C}’\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{g}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{C}’\mathrm{i}$$(\mathrm{p} )=\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{e} \mathrm{X}’\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p}))$And insocial gathering X.is.

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{S}’\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p})=\mathrm{a}$$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{j}/\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p})=\mathrm{f}$a$\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{X})$which shows possibility scopes of agent in the$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{C}’\mathrm{i}(\beta))$$\mathrm{x}|\exists \mathrm{q}\in$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{X})\mathrm{i}( (\mathrm{p} ))$:$\in \mathrm{c}\mathrm{j}(\mathrm{X})\mathrm{j}((\mathrm{q}))]$

Above these studies, we can define twin conditions of social endowsment powers ofissocial structure$\mathrm{P}$1]$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{C}\mathrm{j}/\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p}))\cap \mathrm{C}’\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p})=\phi$$2]\forall$$\in \mathrm{c}’\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{p}),\forall \mathrm{y}\in \mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{i}$(Cjli$(\mathrm{p})$)$:(\mathrm{x}, \mathrm{y} )\in \mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{i}$($\mathrm{P}$(Rj))

said that social structures which should be supposed as second best in theconditions of outsider sellections, show dfferent conditions from which should havesupposed as first best sellections in the conditions of outsider first best sellections.
said that the social structures which consist of both evasion sellections of agent
and first best sellections of agent is collectable from the social structures which
consist of first best sellections of agent both and .
In these collective studies about endowsment semantic decisions which shows$1]\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$$2]\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{j}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{i}$225under conditions of second best advocacy overlap layered
can observethat the introducing endowsment power elements is vital medium issues for
optimization of advocacy overlap layered structures.And in additions, furthermore,
there needs medium sub agent categories in advocacy overlap layered structures lke
Sabatier P.A.says And we can build dynamic measurable equational SME models
alongside with these contexts.
And
the contexts of convolusion equational model studies of advocacy
overlap layered structures
can discuss fundamental non principal labour
utilty models using
models for examples as folows.
$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{D}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{M}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}$$\mathrm{u}=1/2\gamma 1\mathrm{X}2+\gamma 2\mathrm{X}+Y\mathrm{s}$$\equiv\gamma$$1\mathrm{Z}1+\gamma$$\mathrm{X}=\mathrm{I}+\mathrm{s}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}$$2\mathrm{Z}_{2}+\gamma$$\mathrm{X}\Lambda$$+\gamma$$4\Lambda$$+1/2\gamma 5$$3\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{s}+\gamma 4\mathrm{Z}4+\gamma 5$

A2$\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{s}$,T-sh: Labour hours.
: Household labours who can work.
: Gross disposable labour hours of Household labours,: Gross labour hours of Households.
:Wage rates,
A:Non productive labour hours of Household labours:Gross household labour of numbers of non principal labour
In these contexts,density equation
about deviation ratio
is as follows.
$(\gamma
4)>0$
,
when
$\mathrm{A}=\mathrm{M}$$\mathrm{h}$$\mathrm{M}$$\mathrm{T}$$\mathrm{W}$$\mathrm{X}$$\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{f}$$\gamma$$\mathrm{r}<\gamma$$4<\mathrm{R}$$\gamma 4\sim \mathrm{f}$$(\gamma 4)=0$
and another,In these cases, ( , R) shows deviation scopes of labour hours
And also,selection model of Household labours who can work is as follows, $i=1$ $-$ J.
$4\sim \mathrm{f}$$\gamma$$\mathrm{r}$$\mathrm{P}_{\mathrm{i}}=\mathrm{P}\mathrm{r}$In these$(\mathrm{u}\mathrm{j}>\mathrm{u}\mathrm{i}|\mathrm{f} \neq \mathrm{i})$deviation of labour collective actions$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{U}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$$\mathrm{u}\mathrm{i}-\mathrm{u}\mathrm{j}=(\mathrm{Z}4\mathrm{i}-\mathrm{Z}4\mathrm{j})$$\mathrm{y}$ij is$(\gamma 4-\mathrm{y}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j})$$\mathrm{y}$But$\mathrm{i}\neq \mathrm{J}$.

,$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{i}=1,\ldots$, J.

$\mathrm{Z}_{41}>\mathrm{Z}42>\ldots.>\mathrm{Z}4\mathrm{j}\cdot 1>\mathrm{Z}4\mathrm{j}$And$\mathrm{R}>\mathrm{y}$$12>\mathrm{y}23>\mathrm{y}$$34>\ldots.>\mathrm{y}\mathrm{J}- 2.\mathrm{J}- 1>\mathrm{y}\mathrm{J}- 1.\mathrm{j}>\mathrm{r}$.
And also,Douglas defines labour sellection models of non principal potential laboursof households as follows.
,
When
,
IR f
$\mathrm{P}_{\mathrm{J}}=\mathrm{I}_{\mathrm{r}y(\mathrm{J}\cdot 1\mathrm{J})}\mathrm{f}$$\mathrm{P}1>0$$\mathrm{P}_{1}=\mathrm{I}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{o}+\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{P}_{2}=1$$-\mathrm{P}1$

But$\mathrm{P}1$$\mathrm{P}2$

In these.

: [ 1,:$(\gamma 4)\mathrm{d}_{\gamma 4}$$\mathrm{P}_{2}>0$.

$(\gamma 4)\mathrm{d}_{\gamma}4$

non principal potential labours of households $=0$
:non principal potential labours ofhouseholds $>0$
deviation household equation is $$\mathrm{T}1$$[1 \mathrm{t}+\mathrm{W}\mathrm{h}, \mathrm{T}-\mathrm{h}]$$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}$226$-\Phi$$\mathrm{P}_{1}=1$(a$0+\mathrm{a}1$)(a $0+$ a 1)$\mathrm{P}_{2}=\Phi$labour models of each overlap layered advocacy semantic class
informal sectors household deviation models are$\mathrm{T}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{P}_{1\mathrm{k}}=1$$-\Phi$(a$0+\mathrm{a}$$11\mathrm{k}$)I1)2r=$ (aof each overlap layered advocacy semantic
deviation incomes equation
informal sectors household deviation models which areclass
jk of informal sectors isindicated as the gathering$0+\mathrm{a}$$\mathrm{P}$$1$$\mathrm{L}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{g}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{L}=\Pi$$\mathrm{k}=1^{\mathrm{K}}\underline{\mathrm{n}\mathrm{k}}\mathrm{P}$$1\mathrm{k}\cdot \mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{n}$llnlk$\mathrm{P}2\ln 2\cdot$.

$2\mathrm{k}$Even in this fundamental biographical review of these contexts, we can observe
adoptabilities of measurment studies of semantic overlap network advocacy
structures which should be approved by convoluted equational structures by informal
sectors household deviation models
And therefore in the arguement points of specification study of sub medium
agents of overlap layered advocacy semantic class structures studies we can also
observe some specification informal sector’s finance medium organization
specificah.on equational m0de1s a8 follows.
Besley says in the implications of finance medium organization
specification equational models ,there are specification organization models which
do not able to substitute to other finance models.
Besley says that there is specificated restricted structures of domestic
monetary finance organizations about informal sectors and these specifications
usually consists in restricted conditions of equibrium equational elements.Theseequational elements indicates non under zero based restriction structures as the
profit equation of lending is asthese
conditions of$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{i}\cdot \mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{h}.\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}.\mathrm{I}\mathrm{n}$follows.
$1=\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}-(1-\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i})\mathrm{F}((1+\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i})\mathrm{L}\mathrm{i})-\mathrm{C}\mathrm{r}(\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{L}\mathrm{i})$$\mathrm{i}$$\lambda$

And concerning cost equations are
)
( ,
, W2,
$\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{C}$$Y$$\mathrm{W}1$$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{E}$$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p}$

$)$

2

In

$\mathrm{C}=\alpha 0+\alpha$$1\ln$

I$\mathrm{W}\mathrm{j}+\underline{1})$$+\gamma 1\mathrm{y}\mathrm{E}$

2

2

2

2

$Y+\underline{1\alpha 2}(|\mathrm{n}Y)2+\mathrm{Z}$$\beta$IM 1$\mathrm{n}$$\beta \mathrm{j}\mathrm{I}$$\mathrm{n}$2$\mathrm{j}^{\underline{-}}1$

Wl 1$\mathrm{n}\mathrm{W}$$\mathrm{m}+\gamma 1\mathrm{E}+\gamma$$2\mathrm{E}2+\mathrm{Z}Y$$1\Leftrightarrow 1u\approx\uparrow$I$\mathrm{n}$$Y$

And concerning equations about bad debt prospects is$\mathrm{i}^{=1}$$1\mathrm{j}\mathrm{E}$.I$\mathrm{n}\mathrm{W}\mathrm{j}$227n$\mathrm{n}$$(1+\mathrm{r})\mathrm{L}\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{Z}$I$1=(1 -\mathrm{r})\mathrm{Z}$$(\mathrm{x} 1)\mathrm{d}\mathrm{x}$$\mathrm{F}$$\mathrm{L}\mathrm{i}-\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{D}+\mathrm{C}$$\mathrm{k}=1$$\mathrm{i}=1$(I$\mathrm{L}\mathrm{i}$) $-\theta$ A.

$\mathrm{j}=1$: doposit amounts:lending amounts:lending rates,: lending amounts per spreads: lending cost rates: labour costs: accomodate amounts:external elements about credit organization
A:capital scales of credit organization,:withhold profit ratios of credit organization.
And appearently these observate equational studies should be optimized
under conditions of semantic network overlap layered advocacy models.And thesesemantic network account models usualy can be measured by neural networkmodels measurement equational studies.
According to Broomhead, Hikin,fundamental studies, forexamples, classified neural network structures models shows as folows

But$\mathrm{L}\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}$$Y$$\mathrm{C}$$\mathrm{W}$$\mathrm{D}$$\mathrm{W}$

$1$

$2$

$\mathrm{E}$$\theta$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}’\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{p}$$\mathrm{y}$$\mathrm{a}=1$$/[1$ $+\exp 1-\mathrm{v}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{a}-\mathrm{Z}1$ $/1$$+\exp(rightarrow\omega \mathrm{o}1-\mathrm{Z}\omega \mathrm{k}1\mathrm{x} \mathrm{K})\}\}\}\}+\epsilon$

$1=1$

But

$\mathrm{W}$$Y$a$\mathrm{k}=1$:linier conjunction models between each elements,
output equationsof exit class.
rresumes of each elements of exit$\epsilon$class.
:given imputsemantics of entrance class.
Basis Function model
And also,
basic structures of network models which consists of exit entrance andmiddle class$\mathrm{X}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{R}\mathrm{B}\mathrm{F}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l},\mathrm{R}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$structures.
When [$\mathrm{x}$and$\mathrm{F}$$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{x}$$\mathrm{i}\in \mathrm{R}\mathrm{P}|\mathrm{i}=1$, 2, . Nl$\ldots$)$=\mathrm{Z}$($\omega \mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{x}$-x i)$\mathrm{i}=1$-x i) rvitalize equations of middle classstructures.
:linier conjunction between exit and middle class structures
network models
And also, these linier conjunction models ofadverce Gauss lnkaged equation models , follows.
($\mathrm{X}$$\omega$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{R}\mathrm{B}\mathrm{F}$includes$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}$$\mathrm{f}$$(\mathrm{r})$1$=$$(\mathrm{r}2+\mathrm{C}2)(1/2)$$\mathrm{f}$$(\mathrm{r})$$=\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}$$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{f}$$\mathrm{r}2/2\sigma 2\}$$\mathrm{C}>0$, $\sigma>0$ .

.

$\mathrm{r}\geq 0$$\mathrm{r}\geq 0$

household measurment non lenier labour models
And
which should be modefied optimized sub renmmas under each statistic specfications.
spesifciated SME models about advocacy overlap layered social
structures should be diverced by each virtical structured geometrical social structures.
$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}$$\mathrm{F}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$228
And according to this contexts finance medium structures about advocacy overlap
layered social structures should be contain speculated finance medium agent equation
models. And another viewpoint of observate models of advocacy overlap layered social
structures, we should use some stochastic measurment equations between advocacy
overlap social structured layeres and also, we should observe and measure under
optimistic semantic agents structure models. These approval conditions about
advocacy overlap layered social structures should be measured under Neural eqation
models, but due deligences of these study should be dlscribed in altenatives. In thisstudy we should describe some introductional Gaussian Neural eqation models whichshould be defined under overlap layerd structual model’s adoptabilities.

Conclusion
In this study Iintend to describe theory based adoptabilties of advocacy
overlap layered social structures of developing coutries.Needless to
structures study of developing coutries have biographical structures which haveviewpoints structures
various categories of social science
about various categories of social science studies want more high capacity likage
semantic synthesis aboutaccountability structures which should havebiographical structures.In these conditions this study consists in fundamental scopes
and scales studies which structured fiames are in the biographical study of advocacy
fundamental fiames.Independency and mutual information quantitive approval about
be operated under advocacy overlap layered
geometric semantic agents$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{o}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{p}^{\underline{1\mathrm{i}}}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}1\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{d}$social structures.

229$Biog\tau\theta\beta Aic\theta ls$. “An Advocacy Coaltion Framework of Policy Change and the Role of$[1]\mathrm{P}.\mathrm{A}.\mathrm{S}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}$Sciencesyol. “Top Down
Policy oriented Learning Therein,and Bottom Up Approarches to Implementation Research :a Critical Analysis andsuggested
Public Policy:Theory International Politics 1979.New.York.McGrawHiI.Kappen. “Bridging transnational relations back
“Structures ofgovernance and transnational relations.Cambridge University. ”Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled systems”$21.1988\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}.129\sim 168$$” PoL\dot{\mathrm{c}}y$$\mathrm{V}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}6.\mathrm{N}\mathrm{o}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}" J\mathrm{o}urnal$$[2]\mathrm{K}.\mathrm{N}.\mathrm{W}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{z}$$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}":\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$$[3]\mathrm{T}.\mathrm{R}$$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s},1995.\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}280$$[4]\mathrm{W}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{k}.\mathrm{K}.\mathrm{E}$

G.R.Salancik “TheAdministrative Science
External Control of $Organizations.\cdot A$ Resource Dependence PerspectiveHarper and
Row 1978
TheoryPress.Japanese translation version.
.
‘Democracy and Education’An introduction to the Philosophy of$Quarterly\mathrm{V}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}21..1976.\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\sim 19.\mathrm{J}.\mathrm{P}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}.\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

-

’
$A$

$[5]\mathrm{J}.\mathrm{R}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}$$ofJust\mathrm{i}ce1971.\mathrm{H}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}$$[6]\mathrm{J}.\mathrm{D}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{y}$Educationtranslation version.
[ P. Boundieu.La Distinctionl CritiqueSociale dutranslation
version.
’Social Structure and $PersonaL\dot{t}y’$ Japanese translation version.
.Sapir. $Language.\cdot An$ introduction to the study Ofspeech.1921.
Saussure. ‘La.Partie.dogmatique de la philosophie sociale. ’Paris.; Societepositiviste denseignemet populaire superieur 1891.
[ll]D.Fudenberg and D.JLLevine 1998 ’The Theory $ofLearningi_{E}$ Games: Economics$Learn\dot{l}ngs$ and Social Evolution.MIT. Press.
1921 . Hart. 1916. ’Firms, Contracts andFinancial Structure Oxford University Press.
[13]A.Wendt. “Anarchy is What State Make ofSocial Construction of Power
Politics
ternati0na1 Organization. 1992 ,[14]S.C.Tsiang “Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds Theories, Multipherand
1956. “Stock
Synthesis “American Economic Review
Velocityor Portforio Approarch to Monetary Theory and the NeO-Keynesian School ofJames.
$Tobin”/\# S$ Journal
J.R.Hicks. “The Monetary Theory of D.H.Robertson”
Econometrica $9.10,1942.A$ Market Theory of Money Oxford Clarendon Press“A Keynesian Counter Revolution :A Theoretical Appraisal” The
Theory of Interests London Macmilan 1965
”AReconsideration of theMicrofoundations of Monetary Theory Western Economic Journal 6.
.1928[15]D.H.Robertson ”Theories of Banking Policy” Econometrica.Banking Policy and the Price Level.An Essay io the Theory of the Trade Cycle,.King andLondon:.
Technique and Land Utilzationin a[16]D.J.Stryker “Population
Village Economy The American Economic Review 1976. pp347\sim 358 June P.A$1916.\mathrm{J}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$$Jugement.1979.\mathrm{J}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$$\prod$$[8]\mathrm{T}.\mathrm{P}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}$‘$[9]\mathrm{E}$$[10]\mathrm{F}.\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}$’$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}:\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{r}In$$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}.422$$46.\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}539\sim 564$$\mathrm{A}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}:\mathrm{A}$$1982.6.\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}$$1989.\mathrm{R}.\mathrm{W}.\mathrm{C}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}$$n$$8.\mathrm{J}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}$$\sim 146$$\mathrm{P}.\mathrm{S}$$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n},1915$$\mathrm{D}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{A}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}31$

230
Samuelson
21“Thunen at Two Hundred Journal

Economic Literature December 1983.

$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}1468-88$[17]R.Nurkse Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries Oxford

BackweU. 1953
[18]P.R.Lawrence and J.W.Lorschand Environment $.\cdot Managing$
Differenciation and Integration Harvard University Press.
[19]G.G.Dess.and R.L.Preim 1995. “Consensus Performance
andEmpirical
ofManagement Studies.WOlS2.No[20]D.C.Hambrick and. “UpperOrganization as amanagement Review
Refliction of Its Top[21]N.M.Tichy.M.L.Tushman.and C.Fombrum
Social Network Analysis in
Organizations “Academy ofManagemen Revie.
$\alphaDiscontin$[22]D.ANadler.R.B.Shaw.A.E.Walt0n. 1995.
uous Change Jossey Bass.Inc.
J.P.Kotter. $1996.Leading$ Change Harvard Bussiness School.
[23]I.Adelman. “Economic develoment and political change in developing countries. inSocial Reseanch.New.Kinsey.Farm equipment innovations ineastern and central southern Africa.P.Bardhan .A.Rudra. “Interlinkage of land
analysis of village survey data in Eastlndia.in Economic andandcredit
Political Weekly.
[24]T.R.Kappen. “Bridging transnational relations back
“Structures ofgovernance and transnational relations.Cambridge University
R.O.Keohane and J.S.Nye . “Power and Interdependence” Worldin Transition.
BrOwn,&C0.1977.
Little[25]P.V.de la.Blache. ’Principes de Geographic Humain etranslation
Iwanami Publishing[26]J.Dewey ’Democracy and Education’An introduction to the Philosophy of
Educationtranslation versi0n.1975 Iwanami Publishing pp.93\sim 115[
R.Schneider.Neck.and,S.Hofreither 1989.TheConsequences of aChanging
Empirical Results or Austria in:
Shadow Economy for the ‘Official
andB.Felderer(eds)
D.Bos
The Political Economy Progressive Taxation, Heidelberg,
Springer Pubhshing Company.pp. 181\sim 211.
[28]D.J.Striker, “Population
Land Utilization in
the Village Economy” The American Economic Beview.June $1976.66/3\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p},343\sim 358$[
, “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography” Journal of
Political $Economy99.\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}.183$ -199.1993. “On the Number and Location of Cities”
European Economic Review. “First
Nature andMetropobitanof Regional Science. Development
Geography and Economic Theory $MYT$ press.
[30]M.Janssens ,P.D.Grauwe and H.Leliaert. ‘Real Exchange Rate Variabilty
Princeton Studies in International Finance 56$1967,\theta rganization$$\mathrm{R}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}.:\mathrm{T}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{E}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}" \mathrm{J}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{P}.\mathrm{A}.\mathrm{M}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}.1984$$\mathrm{E}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}:\mathrm{T}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{V}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}9.\mathrm{N}\mathrm{o}.2$$\mathrm{M}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s}".Acade\mathrm{m}y$“$\mathrm{V}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}4.1979$’“$\mathrm{Y}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{k}.1980.\mathrm{I}.\mathrm{A}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}.\mathrm{B}$$\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}.:\mathrm{A}\mathrm{n}$$1978.\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{b}$$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{N}:\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s},1995.\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}280$$PoL\dot{t}ics$$.1922\mathrm{J}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}.1940$’$1916.\mathrm{J}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$$2\eta$$\mathrm{M}$$\mathrm{E}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{l}:\mathrm{S}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}$$\mathrm{D}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{A}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{T}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$29\mathrm{J}\mathrm{P}.\mathrm{K}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}.1991$$37.\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}.293\sim 298.1993$$\mathrm{L}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}" \mathrm{J}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$$\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{S}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$33.\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}.129\sim 144.1995$

231“Absorbing Outcomes in 2
D.Wittman. 1981, ”NonmytopicEquilibria in 2
X2 Games” Conflict Management and Peace Science $6-1.\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}39\sim 52.1985.Superpower$$Games.\cdot applying$ game theory to superpowerconfhct.’lale University Press,.
[32]P. Douglas. 1988. The Theory of Wages Macmillan Publishing. Co.
[33]T. Besley.and S. Coate. 1995 Group lending repayment incentives andsocial collateral.
Journal Development Economics[34]D.S.Broomhead.and D.Lowe.1988. Multivariable functional interpolationand
adaptive networks Complex Systems.2. pp.321\sim 355.
[35]S.Baykin. $l994.Neural$ Networks MacmUlan College Publishing New York.
[36]D.L0we.l99l.On the inerative inversion of RBF
statisticalinterpretation, Second $IEE$ Intrerational Conference on Artificial Neural Networks
Institute of Electrical Engineering
Conference Publication. 349. pp. $29\sim 33$
Bounnemouth U.K[31]S.J.Brams.and P.H.Marek.1982.

$\mathrm{X}2\mathrm{G}m\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}" Behaviora\mathit{1}$$Sc\mathrm{i}ences.\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}.393\sim 405.27/4,\mathrm{S}.\mathrm{J}.\mathrm{B}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s}.\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$$\mathrm{N}.\mathrm{Y}$$\cdot$$\mathrm{V}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}46.\mathrm{N}\mathrm{o}1$$\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{s}.:\mathrm{A}$