THE EFFORT OF WASTE WATER MANAGEMENTIN NORTH SUMATRA( JOKASHO APPROACH )Dr. Ir. Hidayati
Environmental Protection Agency of North Sumatra ProvinceOutline of Discussion
1 A glance of waste water condition in North Sumatera Profile
1.
2. Jokasho is the smart installation waste water treatment
3. Lokasi Pioritas dalam penyelamatan sumber daya air di Sumatera Utara( Danau Toba ) dan sungai Padang.
4. GHG Potential in North Sumatera Province
5.Responsibility Identification for BAU and Mitigation Action in Waste sector

Current Condition of Waste Water Management inNorth Sumatera Province

PROFILE OF NORTH SUMATRA PROVINCE
Population: 12.985.075

Population growth: 1,321 32 %Area: 71,680 Km2(3,7 % x Indonesia)

GDP: Rp. 126,45 Trilyun

Export: US$. 761,34 Juta

Import: US$. 450,60 Jutaeconomic growth: 2,04 % (Tri. I 2013)

Temperature: 18 - 32 C

(Average rain fall per year 2000 mm)

Waste Processing in Indonesia

Total Volume of Waste Water 2028

Problem faced of Domestic Wastewater inNorth Sumatera
1.

Domestic Wastewater in North Sumatera not managed well beacuse on a few have recivedwastewater treatment facilities (± 0,2 % from the population in North Sumatera.)

2. Lake Toba is the largest volcanic lake in the world but now its polluted. Have performed calculations
required capacity of Lake Toba and pollutant load reduction of catch‐ment area.
3. Tebing Tinggi city is surrounded by Padang River and the status of Padang River has a Black Status(Enviromental rate) nowi also polluted , this city is also located in the Northen Sumatera about 90
miles and also Terrian of60 Km from the new Internasional Airport Kuala Namu.
4. Treatment and Condition of Septic Tank has no Processing only Latrine Type in all over Indonesia
6. No processing for Grey Water

7. water resources which consists of 72 Watershed (DAS), 99 master streams, 783
creeks and 659 small twigs river. Largely influence by domestic waste water

8. Industrial ; ± 1400 industries, type of industry : processing industry, not allobey the regulation.

Facilities of Wastewater Treatment in North Sumatera•IPAL Cemara ((domestic wastewater Treatment Plan)t)
has the capacity to process waste 60.000 m3/day until
2012.
•That has been used 20.000 m3/day. For the west sideof Medan city that has been planned up to year 2030
•not qualified to have an integrated waste water disposal
system when the population under one million
i h bit t
inhabitants• This relates to the need for substantial investment tobuild an integrated wastewater treatment systems.

% System Waste Disposal and Water Management (Domestic)

NoCity/ Region

Discharged into the sea, rivers andlakes

Latrine / pit latrine (wet climate /use the rinse water, ground watergthan the latrine))level is higher

Septic system(septic tank)

Centralizedaerobicwastewater

0,50,70,50

MCF City/ Region

1Kab. Nias

32,5956,67

10,74

00,61

2

Kab. Mandailing Natal

71,51

11,78

16,71

00,52

3

Kab. Tapanuli Selatan

75,19

5,36

19,45

00,51

4Kab. Tapanuli Tengah

44,09

27,12

28,79

00,55

5Kab. Tapanuli Utara

10,3

33,2756,43

00,57

6Kab. Toba Samosir

12,73

29,32

57,95

00,56

7

Kab. Labuhan Batu

7,1529,8762,98

00,56

8

Kab. Asahan

3,9530,6565,400,56

9

Kab. Simalungun

8,8928,6162,500,56

10Kab. Dairi

7,1237,1655,72

00,57

11

Kab. Karo

17,92,11,11,70,97,00,52,12

Kab. Deli Serdang

35,56

11,1553,2900,52

13

Kab. Langkat

8,32

35,78

55,900,57

14

Kab. Nias Selatan

18,56

78,25

3,19

00,66

15

Kab. Humbang Hasundutan

8,634,82

56,58

00,57

16

Kab. Pakpak Barat

18,26

31,36

50,38

00,56

% System Waste Disposal and Water Management (Domestic)

NoCity/ Region

Discharged into the sea
sea, rivers andlakes

Latrine / pit latrine (wet climate /use the rinse water,water ground waterlevel is higher than the latrine)

Septic system(septic tank)

Centralized
aerobic
wastewater

MCF City/ Region

17Kab. Samosir

4,72

51,36

43,92

00,60

18

Kab. Serdang Berdagai

4,75

21,49

73,76

00,54

19

Kab. Batu Bara,
11,87

25,44,62,69,00,55,

20

Kab. Padang Lawas Utara

46,18

19,64

34,18

00,54

21

Kab. Padang Lawas

52,46

28,23

19,31

00,56

22

Kab. Labuhanbatu Selatan

12,65

26,34

61,01

00,55

23

Kab. Labuhanbatu Utara

12,5638,84

48,600,58

24

Kab. Nias Utara

17,46

61,89

20,65

00,62

25

Kab. Nias Barat

12,95

66,28

20,77

00,63

26g
Kota Sibolga

54,74,4,75,40,51,00,51,27

Kota Tanjung Balai

14,43

5,27

80,300,51

28

Kota Pematang Siantar

8,21

4,27

87,52

00,51

29

Kota Tebing Tinggi

2,03

3,38

94,59

00,51

30

Kota Medan

94,42

65*

21,58

0,4031

Kota Binjai

6,79

4,95

88,26

00,5132

Kota Padang Sidempuan

35,115,759,1900,51

33

Kota Gunungg Sitoli

39,75

29,71

30,54

00,56

Sumber: Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional (Susenas), 2010
Keterangan: *) RIPJM 2011-2015 Kota MedanCapacity Index map of North Sumatera Province

Gg CH4 Ekuivalen)

Jokasho is thesmart installationwaste
t watert ttreatment
tt

300
250

44.91

200
150
208.23

100
50

Tahun

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

0LimbahCair
LimbahPadat

EEnvironmental
it lmanagement andprotection

The components of environment

water

airi

biodiversity

Domestic
waste

landVegetation
coverIndustrial waste

Liquidi id waste

S lid WasteSolidjokasho3RPlant

Gas PollutantllWhy do we need Jockashou ?
1. Have technology that can reduce pollution domestic waste
2. Housing conditions in North Sumatra is very difficult torebuild the channel.
3. Easy monitoring and operation. (Can be done with periodicmaintenace)
4. Save water resources from pollution in North Sumatra
5. In Lake Toba has happened
ppeutrophicationpmayy also reducethe burdenorganic pollutants that can reduce the growth spurt water
hyacinth (algae).

General Description of Lake Toba
• Width: 110.260 Ha• Height: ± 900 m dpl• Rainfall: 1.700 – 2.400mm/year• Sub DAS on DTA : 19 Sub DAS• Include 9 (nine) regencies:– Karo regency
gy– Dairi regency– Simalungun regency– Toba Samosir regency– Humbang Hasundutan regency– Samosir regency– North Tapanuli regency– Asahan regency
gy– Tanjung Balai city

Activity Near Lake Toba
Disposalsposal oof wate in Lakea e Toba
oba

Toilet near Balige District

Washin thier clotesh near lake Toba
Eceng gondok di Kelurahan Tiga Raja Kecamatan Girsang S. Bolon

Lwaste/ Polluted

Domestic Waste Water

Eceng gondok di Kelurahan Tiga Raja Kecamatan Girsang S. Bolon

Source
1. As the source ofdrinking water 82% of thecommunities around Lake
Toba using lake water as araw water source ofd i ki water
drinkingt2. As Hydro Power Station:‐ Asahan hydropower has 450 MW Capacity‐ Lae Renun hydropower has 82 MW Capacity

3. Asahan hydropower, which uses the water of Lake
Toba as the turbines,
turbines where the electricity
generated is used by PT. Inalum for aluminum
smelting
4. PT. Toba Pulp Lestari that use water as the waterof Lake Toba River production through Asahan
5. As tourism destination such as:
Parapat Tomok,Parapat,Tomok Tuk‐tuk Siadong,Siadong Tongging,Tongging
Sipisopiso waterfall, Tao Silalahi, Muara‐Pulau
Sibandang, Haranggaol, Tao Sidihoni, Tele, Hot
Spring Pangururan,Pangururan etc.
etc

Pig Farm in Near Lake Toba
‐PT. Allegrindo• Capacity
Cit off P
Productd t thatth t iis permitted
itt d : 25.000
25 000ekor/semester
25 000 ekor/semester• Total Livestock : 25.000• Type of Waste that is Produced: Liquid waste, Solid,Gas• Solid Waste can be used for composting and also for
Fertilizer• Liquid waste can be process to be water thatcan be
consumed for livestock.
• Regulation Number : 15
15.07/P2KLB3‐2012
07/P2KLB3 2012 parameter
Enviromental that has been qulified.

Capacity of polluted Area (DTBP) Parameter for
Danau Toba T‐PMethod
Mth d off M
Measurementt :‐ Permenlh No. 28 Tahun 2009Load capasity WaterP ll ti and
PollutiondRReservior.
i
Status trofik Danau Toba :‐ Oligotrofik
Oli t fik (T‐P(T P < 10 µg/l)/l)
Monitoring Result 2012 : T‐P = 110 µg/l
K d TT‐PKadar
P Danau
DT b qualified
Tobalifi d off oligotrofik
li t fikII. Lake Toba Ecosystem
Pollution Load
1. Domestic Pollution LoadRegency

Domestic Pollution Load (kg/day

2. Pollution load from others

II. Lake Toba Ecosystem
Pollution Load
1. Domestic Pollution LoadRegency

Deomestic Pollution Load (kg/day

2. Pollution load from others

Sourcess
RainfallAgriculture
Grass Land
ForestPaddy Field

3. Livestock Pollution Load

4. Fishery Pollution Load

Unit Limbah
Rata‐rata Rata‐rata Total Total
Total Limbah
JumlahPemilik KJA
Produksi Pakan Produksi Pakan Nitrogen Phospor BOD Nitrogen Phosporuniit (ton/tahun/uni(t /t h / it KJA) (ton/tahun)(t /t h )(K /K PPakan)(Kg/Kgk)(t /t h )(ton/tahun)
Masyarakat 8428 2,84 4,3 23.935,5 36.240,4
1.163,3 409,50,0321 0,0113 0
PT.PT Aquafarm 484
31.310000
000,0 59.595200
520,0
1.19106
910,6 672,67266
Total
54.935,5 95.760,43.073,9 1.082,1

Water Quality for
Danau toba
(parameter: TSS, M&L, BOD,
COD NO3 NH3 DO pH)
COD,NO3,NH3,DO,

STATUS MUTU AIR DANAU TOBA (PEMANTAUAN 2005 s/d 2010)
No DesaNilai StoredKesimpulan
1 TONGGING‐12Cemar Sedang
2 HARANGGAOL‐15Cemar Sedang
3 SALBE‐12Cemar Sedang
4 TIGARAS‐2020CCemarSedang
S d
5 PARAPAT‐20Cemar Sedang
6 SIMANINDO‐18Cemar Sedang
7 AJIBATA‐2020Cemar Sedang
8 TENGAH SILALAHI‐18Cemar Sedang
9 AMBARITA‐12Cemar Sedang
0 TOMOKO O‐188CemarCea Sedang
Seda g1011 ONAN RUNGU‐20Cemar Sedang
12 TENGAH TAO SILALAHI‐10Cemar Ringan13 SIREGAR AEK NALAS/SIGAOL‐20Cemar Sedang
14 PORSEA‐26Cemar Sedang
15 BALIGE I‐12Cemar Sedang
16 BALIGE II‐12Cemar Sedang
17 LINTONG‐8Cemar Ringan
18 MUARA‐16Cemar Sedang
19 BAKARA‐20Cemar Sedang
20 PALIPI/MOGANG‐2626Cemar Sedang
21 PANGURURAN‐18Cemar Sedang
22 SILALAHI‐18Cemar Sedang

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN BUSINESS / ACTIVITIES IN
THE LAKE TOBA
Hotel

Hospital/clinic

Total: 23hotelTotal : 6WWTP

83% do nothave theWWTP

67% do nothave theWWTP

Enviromental
Document

100 %nothave
Enviroment
alDocument

Wastewaterdischarge
permit100% haveawastewater
discharge
permitit

PetroStasionFishery

Farming

PLTA/PLT
M

Ect.

Total : 4

Total : 4

Total : 13

Total : 5‐

100 %do nothave theWWTP

50 %do nothave theWWTP‐

60 % do nothave theWWTP

83 %not
have
Enviromental
Document100 %have anEnvirom
ental
Document

25 % tidak
have
Envrioment
document

100 5 haveenviroment
document

7 % donot haveenviroment
document

40 % do not
haveenviroment
document

100% haveawastewater
discharge
permitit‐

100 %wastewater
discharged
into the lake

67 % permit
to throwwastewater‐

80 % do nothave permit
to discharge
wastewater

Total: 4

GHG Potential in North Sumatera Province

Gg CH44 Ekuivalen)

Emisi GRK ((BAU)) Sektor Limbah Sumut
300
250
44.91
200
150
208.23

100
500
2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Limbah Cair

Tahun
Limbah Padat

BAU baseline domestic wastewater in North
SumatraNo.

Year1

DDomesticti Wastewater
W tt
Emisi GRK (Gg CH4)

Emisi GRK (tCO2eq)

201039,39827.2752

2011

39,91

838.180

3

2012

40,44

849.2284

2013

40,97860.423

5

2014

41,51871.765

6

2015

42 06
42,06

883 256
883.2567

2016

42,61894.899

8

2017

43,18906.696

9

2018

43,75

918.648

10

2019

44,32

930.757

11

2020

44,91

943.026

Project baseline in Emission of GHG (Gg CH4)
In Waste Water Sector,

39,39 Gg
CH4
Year 2010

44,91 Gg CH4
Year 2020.

Base of Calculation
The calculations were carried out on domestic andindustrial wastewater in North Sumatra as a basic reference to:Populationpnumber of industry
Volumes of domestic and industrial wastewater
ddomestici wastewater BOD
O Data, Data sewer andd WWTP
Data domestic wastewater on‐site; septic tanks and pit‐
latrine or other
latrine,other.

Potential of CH4 andN2O emissions

Septic Tank

Sludge dewatering
regularly will reduce
CH4 production.

Open pits/Latrines

Pits / latrine willproduce CH4 when
the temperature andretention time allows.

Direct discharge tothe river

Pits / latrine willproduce CH4 when
the temperature andretention time allows.
allowsUncolleected

Type of Treatment and Disposal

Estimated GHG emissionswastewater sector still use thedefault number of Tier I.
Emissions estimated value is basedon the population of North
Sumatra province, assuming avaluel off ddegradabled bl organicicomponent of 14.6 kg BOD / capita/ year and a maximum capacity
result in methane gas at 0.6 kg
BOD according CH4/kg 2006 IPCC
Guidelines Chapter 6

No.
1.

2.

Usulan Aksi Mitigasi
Program Peningkatan Sarana-Prasarana
Persampahan sesuai UU No 18, 2008)
Program Minimasi Sampah dengan prinsip
3R
No.

3.
4.
55.
6.

Usulan Aksi Mitigasi

ProgramgPeningkatangPengelolaan
g 1. Program Gas Peningkatan
Sarana-Prasarana
SampahPersampahan sesuai UU No18, 2008)
Pembangunan prasarana WasteWater
2. Program
Minimasi Sampah
dengan prinsip 3R
Treatment Pemukiman
3.

ProgramPeningkatan
Pengelolaan Gas Sampah
Pembangunan
prasarana
Waste Water Treatment
Pemukiman
ProgramPengendalianBanjir
ProgramPenyusunan
Perencanaan
Pengelolaan
Persampahan
Penyusunan
Perencanaan
Pengelolaan Air Limbah

Program Pengendalian Banjir
4.
ProgramPenyusunan
Perencanaan
Pengelolaan Persampahan
5.

7.

Penyusunan Perencanaan Pengelolaan
Air6.
Limbah7.

8.

Program Pengelolaan Badan Air

9.

8.

Penurunan Emisi GRK

Pelaksana751.694 tCO2eq

PU Cipta Karya Prov dan K/K, Satker
PLP, BLH Prov, BLH K/K

306.800 tCO2eq

PU Cipta Karya Prov dan K/K, Satker
PLP, BLH Prov, BLH K/K

Penurunan Emisi GRK

Pelaksana
PU Cipta Karya Prov dan
2K/K, Satker PLP, BLHProv, BLH K/K

S k PLP
Satker
PLP, SSwasta

PU Cipta Karya Prov dan

PU Cipta Karya Prov dan K/K, Satker
PLP

35 461 tCO
35.461
CO eq

751.694 tCO2eq

190.293 tCOK/K,2eqSatker PLP, BLH

306.800 tCO2eq

Prov, BLH K/K
PLP, Swasta
94 303 tCO2Satker
94.303eq PLP

35 461 tCO2eq
35.461

190.293 tCO2eq

PU Cipta Karya Prov dan

Satker PLP
Tidak ada nilaiK/K,
emisi
94.303 tCO2eq

Dinas PSDA
PU Cipta Karya Prov dan K/K, Satker
PLP

Dinas PSDA

Cipta Karya Prov dan
TidakadaemisinilaiPUemisi
Tidak ada nilai
K/K, Satker PLP

PU Cipta Karya Prov dan K/K, Satker
PLP, BLH Prov, BLH K/K

PU Cipta Karya Prov dan
Tidak ada nilai
Satker PLP, BLHTidak
adaemisinilai K/K,emisi
BLH Prov, BLH K/K
Prov, BLH K/K

10.
11
11.

Program
Pemberdayaan
Lingkungan dan Masyarakat

Kesehatan

9.

Program Monitoring dan Evaluasi
10.
11.

Program Non Teknis RAD GRK

Program Pengelolaan Badan
Air
Program
Pemberdayaan
Kesehatan Lingkungan dan
Masyarakat
Program Monitoring danEvaluasi

Program Non Teknis RAD
GRK

Tidak ada nilai emisi

BLH Prov, BLH K/K

Tidak ada nilai emisi
Tidak ada nilai emisi

Dinkes K/K, BLH Prov
K/K
Bappeda Prov K/K, BLH

Tidak
adaemisinilaiProvemisi
Tidak ada nilai
K/K, DKP K/K,Tidak ada nilai emisi

Satker PLP
Bappeda Prov K/K, BLH
Prov K/K, Dinas
Pendidikan Provsu

Tidak ada nilai emisi

Total kegiatan

Total kegiatan(termasuk(termask ssubb kegiatan )Total Penurunan Emisi
BAU
Persentase Penurunan Emisi
Total biaya mitigasi

49 kegiatan(termasuk sub kegiatan )Total Penurunan Emisi
BAU
Persentase Penurunan Emisi
Total biaya mitigasi

49 kegiatan

1.368.449 tCO2eqq5.315.858 tCO2eq
25,7%1.841.010,00 (Rp.juta)

1.368.449 tCO2eq
5.315.858 tCO2eq
25,7%
1 841 010 00 (Rp juta)

Dinkes K/K,
K/K BLH Prov K/K
Bappeda Prov K/K, BLH Prov K/K, DKP
K/K, Satker PLP
Bappedad Prov K/K,
/ BLH Prov K/K,/
Dinas Pendidikan Provsu

SSources
off Emissions
E i i
fromf
Waste
W t Sector
S t
by RAN‐GRK

Final
Processing
Domestic SolidWaste

Emission fromWaste sector

Inceneration(open Burning)

DisposalComposting

Communal
Domestic Waste
WatterCentralized

Responsible BAU Identification and Mitigation
Actions Waste Sector

Penetapan Kewenangan Pelaksanaan Aksi Mitigasi Sektor Limbah

Nasional
Provinsi
Kabupaten/KotaSektor(K/L Terkait)(SKPD Terkait)(SKPD Terkait)• Kebijakan
bij k• Kordinasi
di i• Pengelolaan
l ldan program
pengelolaaan
limbah padat dan
pengelolaan
l lli b h padat
limbah
d dan
dcair
i
yang
limbahcair Provinsi
yang
dari
Nasional
Kabupaten/Kotadihasilkan
Sektor(K/L Terkait)(SKPD Terkait)(SKPD Terkait)
Limbah• daridan •dihasilkan
nasionali • l Kebijakan
dihKordinasi
ilk
dPengelolaan
i limbahI d tiIndustriddanpadat dan cair yangprogrampengelolaaan limbah
dihasilkan
daripengelolaan
padat dan cair yang
Limba• Pengelolaan
IndustridanDomestikIndustri
danlimbah nasional
dihasilkan
darihDomestik•
Pengelolaan
Industri
danglimbah B3
li b h B3limbah
D Domestik tik dari dari
Domestikd ikabupaten/kota
kabupaten/kota

Conclusion
1. Is needed Jokasho as solutions to problems of wastewater domestic in North Sumatra
2. Mainly to save Lake Toba from destruction is needed jokasho around Lake Toba.
3. Domestic wastewater in North Sumatra contributed to the decline in the quality ofsurface water (rivers and lakes) and also groundwater.
4.Domestic Waste Management in North Sumatra is a potential toward GHG reduction