ENSA-PVS / GSES-NU / TIANJIN Univ. Joint Architectural and Urban Design Workshop 2017

名 古 屋 大 学 大 学 院 環 境 学 研 究 科 都 市 環 境 学 専 攻 建 築 学 コース
パリ・ヴァル・ドゥ・セーヌ国 立 高 等 建 築 学 校
天津大学建築学院
2017 年 度 国 際 建 築 ・都 市 設 計 ワークショップ＠パリ「Smart House」
大 学 院 環 境 学 研 究 科 都 市 環 境 学 専 攻 建 築 学 コースは、2017 年 9 月 18 日 (月 )から 22 日 (金 )までの 5 日 間 、フランスのパリ・ヴァル・ドゥ・セーヌ国 立 高 等 建 築 学 校 （ ENSAPVS）を主 会 場 として、
ENSA-PVS、天 津 大 学 と合 同 で、「Smart House」をテーマに、観 光 地 としても有 名 なモンマルトルの丘 の急 斜 面 地 の狭 小 地 に、今 日 的 な都 市 生 活 と敷 地 特 性 を読 み込 んだ住 宅 を提 案 する建 築 ・都市 設 計 ワークショップ（以 下 、WS）を開 催 しました。今 回 は ENSAPVS の大 学 院 生 ・学 部 生 約 60 名 と天 津 大 学 の学 生 7 名 、そして名 古 屋 大 学 大 学 院 建 築 学 コース博 士 課 程 前 期 課 程 １年 の小 島 悠 暉 、片 岡 裕 貴 、小 倉 畑 昂 祐 、竹 内 翔 平 、楊 秋 晗 、李 僑 の６名 が参 加 し、３大 学 の学 生 は１２の混 成 グループに分 かれて本 課 題 に取 り組 みました。ＷＳの指 導 は、Boris Weliachew 教 授 、Marco Tabet 教 授（以 上 ENSAPVS）、鄭 穎 副 教 授 （天 津 大 学 ）、小 松 尚 准 教 授 （名 古 屋 大 学 ）が行 いました。
本 WS は、異 なるバックグラウンドを持 つ学 生 同 士 が英 語 で対 話 し協 働 し、提 案 する貴 重 な機 会 を提 供 するものです。この取 り組 みは、2009 年 4 月 以 降 、両 大 学 の間 で締 結 された学 術 交 流 協 定 に基 づき実 施 されています。毎 年 ４月 に名 大 で、９月 にパリで WS を行 っており、ENSA-PVS での WS は
今 回 が８回 目 （名 大 での WS を含 めると 16 回 目 ）になります。
今 回 はまず「Smart House」という抽 象 的 な課 題 の解 釈 と掘 り下 げを行 い、それに基 づいて建 築 的 、都 市 的 提 案 を考 案 していくことになるため、名 大 から参 加 した６名 は、８月 から本 課 題 についての検討 や参 考 事 例 の収 集 など事 前 学 習 を行 って WS に臨 みました。
WS は、まず１ 日 目 は 本 課 題 の説 明 とともに本 課 第 に関 連 するショート・レクチャーが行 われました 。
次 に、20m×28m の一 敷 地 を４分 割 した短 冊 状 の敷 地 （５m×28m）が各 グループに割 り当 てられ、
学 生 はグループで与 えられた敷 地 及 び周 辺 の調 査 に出 向 き、課 題 の読 み取 りや提 案 のポイントについて議 論 と共 有 、そしてデザイン検 討 を開 始 しました。２日 目 以 降 はグループ作 業 を行 い、３日 目には中 間 発 表 会 、５日 目 の夕 方 には成 果 発 表 会 とフェアウェル・パーティを開 催 しました。
最 終 日 の成 果 発 表 会 では、各 グループの調 査 ・提 案 が図 面 （ A0 版 ２枚 ）と模 型 （1/20）によって発表 されました。本 ワークショップの担 当 教 員 だけでなく ENSA-PVS の関 係 者 が多 数 参 加 し、意 見 交
換 と講 評 が行 われました。今 回 の評 価 ポイントとしては、①「Smart House」という課 題 をどう理 解 し、掘 り下 げ、建 築 的 提 案 に展 開 できているか、②これからの住 宅 として魅 力 的 かつ適 切 な空 間 が設計 されているか、③それが適 切 かつ魅 力 的 に図 面 や模 型 で表 現 できているか、といった点 から成 績（20 点 満 点 で採 点 ）が付 与 されました。５日 間 という短 い時 間 ではありますが、特 に①と②について優 れた提 案 が高 い評 価 を得 ましたが、名 大 院 生 がメンバーの一 員 であったグループの提 案 に対 しては全 般 的 に高 い評 価 が与 えられました 。

なお、本 ワークショップに参 加 する学 生 の派 遣 は、独 立 行 政 法 人 日 本 学 生 支 援 機 構 の平 成 27 年
度 海 外 留 学 支 援 制 度 （協 定 派 遣 ）採 択 プログラムとして実 施 し、教 員 の派 遣 等 は環 境 学 研 究 科 研究 科 長 裁 量 経 費 の支 援 を受 けました。
本 パンフレットでは、名 古 屋 大 学 大 学 院 生 がメンバーだったグループの作 品 を紹 介 します。

課題説明とショート・レクチャーと現地調査（１日目）

グループ作業（２日目）

グループ作業（２日目）

中間発表会（３日目）

グループ作業（４日目）

成果発表会（５日目）

成果発表会（５日目）

成績発表と講評（５日目）

参加者集合写真（５日目）

20th International Workshop of Architecture France - Japan - China
From September 18th to 24th 2017
Host university: École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture Paris Val de Seine (ENSAPVS)(3, quai Panhard et Levassor, 75013 Paris)
Responsible Professors:
Boris WELIACHEW and Marco TABET
Teaching staff from “Atelier Tabet”: Pierre TISSERAND, Jean-Baptiste GUILLAUME, Serge RODRIGUES
Philippe MAILLOLS, Sabine MOSCATI, Adrien DURRMEYER, Julien BROUSSART
Participating universities:

University of Nagoya, Nagoya, Japan
Professor: Hisashi KOMATSU

University of Tianjin, Tianjin, China
Professor: Ying ZHENG
On the theme:“Smart house”
Maison intelligente
Programme:
Monday 18th September:
9 :00
10 :00
10:30
11:00
16:00
16:30
17:00
17:30
18:00
18:30
19:00

Reception of the foreign delegations at the Atelier
Workshop subject introduction
Students’ team’s settlement
Building site visit
Evening conferences:
Montmartre (Adrien Durrmeyer)
Sustainable Development Approach (Boris Weliachew)
Paris’ climat (Sabine Moscati)
Wood building (Julien Broussart)
Today’s architectural tendencies (Ying Zheng or Hisashi Komatsu)
Residential experiments (Ying Zheng or Hisashi Komatsu)
Brake« Welcome Party » at the restaurant Fil’O Fromage (12 rue Neuve Tolbiac, Paris 13) [23€ drinks included]… (continuous intensive work)

Wednesday 20th September:
15 :00:

Middle term presentation… (continuous intensive work)

Friday 22d September:
15:00~18:00 : Public Final Presentation of the projects
18:00~18:15 : Display of all projects and models in the main Hall of the ENSAPVS for the Workshops 2017 EXPO
18:15~19 :00 : Judges deliberations
20:00~…
: « Sayonara Party » at the Atelier
NB: notice that depending on the day, the ENSAPVS should be open from 8:00 to 21:00 or 23:00

1. The Subject : Smart house (Maison intelligente)
House theme is a must for all architects. For some Architects, houses were their very first step to a dazzlinginternational career that became prototypes of a new personal approach, a kind of revelation in which conformity
prevailed.
- The «prairie houses» : Robie House and Fallingwater house of Frank Lloyd Wright- The «maisons blanches» and the villa Savoye of Le Corbusier (1921-1931)- The Barcelona Pavillon and the Farnsworth house of Mies van der Rohe
- The teachers’ houses from the Bauhaus to Dessau (Walter Gropius)
In contemporary architecture, it is easy to draw up a list of examples that renew and prolong the founding role ofthe House in the architect’s approach.
- The Family House Butantã , in Sao Paulo, of Paulo Mendes da Rocha- The Family House, in Santa Monica, Ca, of Franck Ghery- The Row house in Osaka, of Tadao Ando
- The House, in Ligorneto, (Tessin Switzerland) of Mario Botta- The Houses N, NA or H of Sou Fujimoto
This list could be much longer. Each of these achievements has been a marker in its time and founded a fruitfulapproach. House is a modest object at a project scale, that could become audacious when it upsets philosophicaland architectural foundations of the “inhabited”. As such, it challenges conventional expectations, placing thesubject into direct relation to its own expectations. The subject resumes its prerogatives, it is him who defines, andthat is why his house becomes an ideal architectural prototype with the ability to influence all other architecturalobjects. The house has a variable and mobile metaphysical heart. It reveals itself reflection and challenges its limits.
Each of these projects has introduced a new paradigm that is built around an emerging subject that has moved
architectural approach in its time :- The American spirit of the pioneer and his relationship with Nature (F. L. Wright)- The « new » man and the living machine (Le Corbusier)- L’homme moderne qui agit sur l’espace phénoménologique (W. Gropius)- Modern man who acts on the phenomenological space (Mies van der Rohe)- Space as distance to be traveled and formativity (R. Koolhaas)- The subject as an absolute and its relation to space, material and light (T. Ando, Paulo
Mendes da Rocha, Luigi Snozzi)- The postmodern subject between tradition and modernism (M. Botta)- The concept as an absolute (S. Fujimoto)- The deconstruction of rationalism and free form (F. Ghery)
Each of these references was the result of a desire, a personal and singular conviction, unpredictable butquestionable. Who could have foreseen they would become “school” references for generations of architects
throughout the World?
Somme architects have managed to share an architectural concept that goes against “family” conventions withsingular family. Starting from very different situations, for their personal laboratories, they knew how to mix
inhabitants of a house with their own profound beliefs. It is not uncommon that “first” project is the private andpersonal home of the architect himself. It is no coincidence that some exemplary houses were considereduninhabitable by their first owners and, paradoxically, these houses were immediately recognized by architects as
something new!
”La Maison Intelligente” - Smart house – of this year’s workshop is based on the idea of reducing material surface ofthe subject and increasing metaphysical one. Our aim is to put you in a position that asserts the architecturalprinciples that are dear to your heart. On the other hand, the small size of the project will allow you to fulfill yourdesires. In this workshop, the cross-pollination of cultural references from your three countries would be a great
stimulus for the emergence of new concepts and innovative proposals.
“maison intelligente“ - Smart house?
It is a common terminology that basically designates connected objects capable of acting with a degree ofautonomy in relation to users. The connected object suggests actions, awakens desires, acts in a certain way byitself. It does not merely obey demands, but anticipates them. It not only provides information, but also the wayforward. It is intelligent, it has an algorithm and a database that allow it to choose , either decide or obey a choice.
It is a fact that intelligent objects are part of our environment. But, should we approach the house from a single andlogical form of intelligence? Furthermore technological?
You are asked to consider the house and its intelligence, on other criteria that technological ones. Your project could
not be summarized in a catalog of home automation where we push buttons or vocalize demands expecting that
our home-robot does everything for us.
Your smart house would be designed to reflect what you consider to be intelligent. In the way of living andespecially in the way of living intelligently. You will make choices that will put you at the center of a project that will
obey your own desires, your commitments, your culture and your way of wanting to live without concessions.
You won’t be the objects, but the architects of your house project.

2. The workshop: work process
1. Building site address : 5, Place du Calvaire, 75018 ParisYour Building land is located in Montmartre, historical site located on the highest hill of Paris. Formerly a hilltop
village on the outskirts of Paris. Artists have made of it a great place of creation and bohemianism in Paris. From thetop of this building land, the view of Paris is magnificent. No doubt it is a privilege to be able to live here.
The building site has a façade on the Place du Calvaire (21.23m long) and another, below, on the Rue Gabrielle(20.00m long). The average gradient is about 13.5m (see the plan).
The plot, of around 550m2 (flat), will be divided into 4 distinct smaller plots, of about 140m2 each and an averagewidth or 5m. These smaller plots will be allocated to students’ teams by a random draw.

2. Working method:
The teams are asked to approach the subject « smart house » thoroughly, bringing together architectural concepts
that respond at first to the proposed problem. Ideas on “smart” – intelligent should be clarified and then associatedwith the architecture of a family home unit. This duality aims to bring together two fantasized objects through aninteresting thought. How to define the intelligence of a house?
The references, ideas and concepts that will fill the space, such as flexibility, sustainability, connectivity, technology,
aesthetics, sociology, etc., will become a basis for each team’s design and concept of a smart house. Once agreed
on a clear and shared concept, the project will be developed while ensuring coherence of the conceptual approachfrom one end to the other.
At the end of the project work, each team will define/identify which kind of family might live well in the proposedhouse.
This method is opposite to the one you usually use to work on, where you first define the choice of the family toinitiate the project. This inversion – architectural choice first – will have a definite influence on your architecturaldesign. You first have to answer the question: “From your view point, what is a “smart house”?
Consider pushing up the design of your house in architectural terms!
The answer to “What kind of family could live in this house?” will be the last point of your work. All types of family
are acceptable: classical families, recomposed families, a family welcoming young people who live in the house too,a young family, and so on. The choices are open, only the model of family organization should be a today’s model.

3. Sustainable Development
Another important point of your project : it should follow a sustainable development approach. This will beconsidered in a global way (material, implementation) and it should respect Paris City’s energy saving policies.
- Designs of façades and building envelope that are energy efficient – even capable of producing energy.
- Use of specific ventilation and heating systems to ensure thermal comfort, in Summer and in Winter.
The use of wood is desirable : bearing walls made of solid wood, as well as poles, beams, floors, panels… But wood
can also be used only as cladding on a steel or reinforced concrete structure.
In principle, your project should stay in a range of 150 to 200m2 maximum.

4. Team organization:
Japanese, Chinese and French students, enrolled in Master 1srt and 2d year programs, will be dispatched into 10teams (to be confirmed depending on the number of students) with a maximum of 7 students per team.
Students from the Atelier Tabet, enrolled in License programs, will be dispatched among the team additionally. And
2 students in each team will be in charge of the site model.

5. Urban rules to consider:a. Shared walls and lateral openings:- The building land division will reveal shared walls at the edge of the houses projects- Openings with views on neighboring properties are prohibited in France- Light-catching openings only are allowed upper to 1.80m- Shared courtyard are possible and negotiable between teams
b. The house will be built at the upper part of the site and with a sidewalk alignment overlooking the Place duCalvaire. Recessing and small garden, should be closed by fences or by aesthetic devices on urban alignment.

c. The number of floors facing the Place du Calvaire should be of a ground floor + 2 floors, with a roof of an accessible
terrace. And the number of floors facing the garden down the site is not defined.
d. More than half of the building plot should stay landscaped and unbuilt. Today, this plot is an enclosed garden
where hives are installed. It is a green and very quiet place.
e. Car : if necessary, a garage could be located on Rue Gabrielle. Attention: This façade should be also carefully
considered and designed.
f. Garden, trees, bushes, paths… are also part of the project.

6. Validation of the architectural approach :- A fertile and interesting Smart House concept- A good insertion of the project in the context of Montmartre, and the Place du Calvaire in particular- The programming and the constructive approach- The graphic and oral presentation of the project

7. Rendering elements:- 1:20 scale model of the Smart House- 1:200 scale model of the entire site common to all the teams
On 1 or 2 A0 panels vertically oriented- Diagrams, explanatory ideograms or sketches of the concept- 1:50 scale plans, sections and facades- 1:20 scale detailed elements
Date of rendering:
Friday 22d September at 16:00
Room: not decided yet
Display of all A0 panels and models in the main hall of the ENSAPVS right after the final presentations

Département :PARIS
Commune :PARIS 18

DIRECTION GÉNÉRALE DES FINANCES PUBLIQUES------------EXTRAIT DU PLAN CADASTRAL-------------

Section : BNFeuille : 000 BN 01
Échelle d'origine : 1/500Échelle d'édition : 1/500

Le plan visualisé sur cet extrait est géré par lecentre des impôts foncier suivant :PARIS - POLE TOPOGRAPHIQUE
6 rue Paganini 75972
75972 PARIS Cedex 20
tél. 01.53.27.42.90 -fax
pole.topographique.paris@dgfip.finances.gouv.
fr

Cet extrait de plan vous est délivré par :Date d'édition : 06/07/2017(fuseau horaire de Paris)

cadastre.gouv.fr

Coordonnées en projection : RGF93CC49©2016 Ministère de l'Économie et des Finances

1651600

1651650

8187550
8187500

8187500

81875508187600

16516508187600

1651600

DIRECTION GÉNÉRALE DES FINANCES PUBLIQUES------------EXTRAIT DU PLAN CADASTRAL-------------

Département :PARIS
Commune :PARIS 18

Section : BN
Feuille : 000 BN 01
Échelle d'origine : 1/500
Échelle d'édition : 1/200

Le plan visualisé sur cet extrait est géré par lecentre des impôts foncier suivant :PARIS - POLE TOPOGRAPHIQUE
6 rue Paganini 75972
75972 PARIS Cedex 20
tél. 01.53.27.42.90 -fax
pole.topographique.paris@dgfip.finances.gouv.
frCet extrait de plan vous est délivré par :Date d'édition : 06/07/2017(fuseau horaire de Paris)

cadastre.gouv.fr

Coordonnées en projection : RGF93CC49©2016 Ministère de l'Économie et des Finances

16516208187580

1651600

8187580

1651580

21,2+143m+08187540

,00m

20,

45

8187540

29,04m27,63m

8187560,80m

8187560+ 13,8altim 0m
étrie

m- 0,20m

1651580

1651600

1651620