28 July 2021

The 8th SIGLOC-online: Pre & Post Self-Evaluation Results
COIL Promotion OfficeOsaka City University, Japan
1. Information on respondents:● Respondents are 12 participants out of 21, who completed the 8th SIGLOC-online program heldfrom 24th June to 21st July 2021
●Respondents evaluated their abilities related to Social Innovation before and after the program witha rubric having four (4) levels (Evaluation sheet is attached as a Reference).

●Respondents’ countries/regions in residence and universities
County/Regionin Residence

Number ofRespondents

UniversityIndonesia

University of Indonesia2Macau

Macau University of Science and Technology

1Malaysia

Heriot-Watt University, Malaysia

1Philippines

De La Salle University

4

TaiwanI-Shou University2Zambia

Mukuba University

2TotalTotal

2. Overall result● Below are the “Overall average scores of respondents by question (ability)”.

12

3. Results by Question (Ability)
Q1: Ability for basic understanding of problems
No. of Respondents
Criteria

Ability for basic understanding of problems
PrePostLevel 1
Acceptable

I understand the sustainability of society and I am able toexplain it.

20Level 2
Satisfactory

I understand the relationships between social economic
growth and/or economic development, and sustainability,and I am able to explain them.

10Level 3
Good

I understand the relationships among social economic
growth, sustainability and policies, and I am able to explain
them.

65

Level 4
Excellent

I understand the relationships among economic growth andsustainability of society; and self-help, mutual-help andpublic-help, and I am able to explain them.

3

7

2.83

3.58

Average Score+0.75
Q2: Ability to discover/identify issues
Criteria

Ability to discover/identify issues

No. of Respondents
Pre

Post

Level 1
Acceptable

I am able to explain social issues that are commonly sharedin a particular society to others.

10

Level 2
Satisfactory

I am able to explain social issues to people in othercountries, including differences in social and cultural
backgrounds (contexts) between their own country and othercountries.

2

1

Level 3GoodI am able to discuss social issues with people from othercountries, including differences in social and cultural
backgrounds (contexts) between my own country and othercountries; and discover/ identify issues.

74

Level 4
Excellent

I am able to discuss social issues with people from othercountries, including differences in social and cultural
backgrounds (contexts) between my own country and othercountries; and discover universal issues.

2

72.83

3.50

Average Score+0.67
Q3: Ability to find creative solutions
No. of Respondents
Criteria

Ability to find creative solutions
PrePostLevel 1
Acceptable

I am able to create solutions to social issues.

11

Level 2
Satisfactory

I am able to create solutions to social issues in the country
where they occur.

31

Level 3
GoodI am able to create measures that can solve social issues insociety, and explain to people in other countries about why
those measures will lead to solving problems.

77

Level 4
Excellent

I am able to create universal solutions to social issues, andexplain their applicability to any country.

1

3

2.67

3.00

Average Score+0.33
Q4: Ability to implement solutions (Collaboration/ Collective impact)
Criteria

Ability to implement solutions (Collaboration/ Collectiveimpact)

No. of Respondents
PrePostLevel 1
Acceptable

I am able to list what is needed to implement solutions tosocial issues.

10

Level 2
Satisfactory

I am able to make a plan to implement solutions to socialissues.

42

Level 3Good

I am able to find relevant organizations and collaborators toadvance a plan to implement solutions to social issues.

45

Level 4
Excellent

I am able to discuss with representatives of relevantorganizations and collaborators in order to advance a planfor implementing solutions; and obtain an agreement ofcollaboration.

352.75

3.25

Average Score+0.50
Q5: LeadershipNo. of Respondents
Criteria

Leadership
PrePostLevel 1
Acceptable

I am able to perform given tasks.

10

Level 2
Satisfactory

I am able to achieve given goals as a group member.

41

Level 3GoodI am able to achieve given goals as a group leader.

44

Level 4Excellent

I am able to create and share goals for my team, and work
together to achieve them.

372.75

3.50

Average Score+0.75

4. Note:● Individual average total of 5 criteria: Pre=2.77, Post=3.37 (Difference=+0.60)

Reference: SIGLOC-online 2021 March Self-Evaluation Form