CORRUPTION CONTROL IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE: THE MADAGASCARSITUATION, PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS AND CORRUPTION CASES
H. Thierry Ravalomanda*
I. INTRODUCTION
As in many other countries, corruption is a daily part of life in Madagascar as it occurs at all levels of
public institutions.
Madagascar being one of the poorest countries in the world, poverty is often considered as the maincause of corruption. Low salaries earned by public servants make it easy for them to be corrupted. Anotherapproach though considers corruption as the cause of poverty. This vicious circle sounds almost impossible
to overcome and for a while, corruption was encouraged by public compliance, fatalism being one aspect ofMalagasy mentality.
Nevertheless, under the impetus of the international donors’ standards and an increasing public
consciousness, a wind of change has started to blow in Madagascar these last few years.
The fight against corruption has become one of the most important tasks of the current Malagasy
Government in order to comply with the requirements of good governance and to enhance the economy of
the country which is severely affected by the plague. It has become a pressing concern at the highest levelsof policy making.

II. THE PRESENT SITUATION
According to the 2005 Transparency International Corruption Perception Index, Madagascar scores
2.8/10 and is ranked 99 out of 159 countries in the world. This shows that some efforts have been put
forward to increase that score. In fact, in the August 28, 2002 Transparency International Corruption
Perception Index Rankings, Madagascar received a score of 1.8/10 and was ranked 98 out of 120 countries.
The impact of the score and the rank led the Malagasy Officials to implement drastic measures to improve
the situation.
Therefore, the Malagasy government decided to establish an Anti-Corruption National Council. Its
mission was to establish a national anti-corruption strategy, prepare the creation of an independent anticorruption agency and draft a new anti-corruption law leading to legislative reforms addressing the issue.

A. The Anti-Corruption Law
Madagascar signed the United Nations Convention against Corruption in Merida, Mexico on December
10, 2003. It was therefore ratified on September 22, 2004 without reservations. The Convention
recommended countries to criminalize behaviours that are considered acts of corruption.
This led the Anti-Corruption National Council to draft the Anti-Corruption Law which was adopted
September 9, 2004.
A major part of the Law deals with the renewing of existing laws criminalizing the giving, offer orpromise of bribes by any party and the receipt or solicitation by any official of a bribe, and laws prohibiting
improper use of official power or position for personal enrichment. In addition to that, new offences havebeen instituted. The law now criminalizes the giving or receiving of an improper gratuity or improper gift,
the fact of not revealing to the proper authority conflict of interest and unjustified enrichment. Officials are
required to disclose their assets. Failure to do so may lead to prosecution.
Most of these measures are aimed at promoting integrity amongst public servants and officials but bribesin the private sector are also prohibited.
Measures to ensure the protection of the perpetrators of corruption acts who before prosecution report* Public Prosecutor, Antananarivo, Madagascar.

121

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No.71

the offence to the authorities have been instituted in order to encourage denunciation.
Before the Law was passed, there was much controversy about the penalization of public officials
receiving improper gifts, as it appears to be a Malagasy custom to give gifts. Also, criminalizing illicit
enrichment seemed to derogate from the principle of presumption of innocence as the burden of proof isreversed.
The Anti-Corruption Law also instituted the Anti-Corruption Independent Bureau or BIANCO.
Some efforts have been put forward lately to elaborate new laws in application of international
conventions but the change is occurring at a very slow pace.
The other Laws that are used in the fight against corruption are mainly the Penal Code and the Money
Laundering Law.

B. Anti-Corruption Institutions
1. The Anti-Corruption National Council (CSLCC)
The Anti-corruption National council was created by Presidential Decree in September 2002. According
to its mission statement it has to focus mainly on setting up the National Anti-Corruption Strategy, preparing
the creation of an independent anti-corruption agency and drafting an anti-corruption law.
The CSLCC works in partnership with various institutions including governmental departments and thecivil society. It has launched many observatory missions throughout the country to evaluate the scale ofcorruption in different sectors.
Its main mission was accomplished when the Anti-Corruption Law was passed, the law which among
others measures created the BIANCO. The CSLCC’s mission now consists of supervising and counselling
the BIANCO, monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the policy and national anti-corruption
strategy.
2. The Anti-Corruption Independent Bureau (BIANCO)
According to the Anti-Corruption Law of September 9, 2004, BIANCO has three main missions:
Prevention, Education and Investigation. It is also responsible for the implementation of the Anti-corruption
National Strategy.
In its prevention activities, the Bureau needs to identify in the legislation, rules and administrative
processes that are factors of corruption and submit reforms to address those factors. It also counsels public
institutions or officials and recommends measures to prevent corruption.
In its education activities, it holds campaigns of sensitization for the general public on the dangers ofcorruption and the need to fight against it.
Finally, BIANCO investigate allegations of corruption that they are made aware of through complaints ordenunciations.
To accomplish that task, it has been invested of important powers that regular police officers do not have.
Immunities cannot be invoked against them and they can issue their own search warrant without court
approval.
They are also independent meaning that the Head of Prosecution or any other judicial or politicalauthority does not have any control over them.
The BIANCO then hands those cases over to the prosecution or drops them if they consider that there is
not enough ground for prosecution.
Up until June 2005, BIANCO has received 3823 complaints and denunciations from all over the country.

122

EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE ON CORRUPTION CONTROL IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE

3. The Anti-corruption Judiciary Unit (CPAC)
In Madagascar, the Judiciary is one of the sectors severely affected by corruption, hence a loss of trustfrom the general public. Also, this undermines the application of law and the implementation of public policy.
For this reason, the CPAC was put in place in May 2004. It is composed of Magistrates from the Tribunal
and Court of Appeal of Antananarivo including public prosecutors, investigating judges and judges. They
have been selected for their high level of competence and integrity. They have been trained in matterspertaining to corruption and financial crimes. Also, some police and gendarme officers and secretaries areworking with those magistrates.
Their task is to prosecute, investigate and judge cases of corruption that are referred to them, mainly by
the BIANCO. They are set apart in their own their own offices, away from the Court in order to reduce thepressure from other colleagues and are provided with facilities such as cars and computers which have been
funded by the Government of Japan. They are required to work efficiently and with speed, in contrast to theway regular cases are being processed in regular courts.
The CPAC actually started to be operational in August 2004 and about 100 cases so far have been
submitted to its prosecution office, mainly cases from the BIANCO and the CPAC police officers. Twentythree of those cases have been dropped mainly because of lack of evidence but also because the acts being
investigated were not offences. Many public officers starting from the basic civil servant to Mayors andMinisterial high officials have been sentenced and jailed on corruption charges.
The CPAC is still experimental and is only competent for the Antananarivo area. For the other provinces,
corruption cases are handed over to regular courts.

III. PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS RELATED TO THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN REGARD TO
CORRUPTION CONTROL
Despite all the aforementioned deterrent measures, the fight against corruption still has many challenges
to face in Madagascar. Ownership of the strategy by many sectors is not satisfactory. Legislative anticorruption measures are important, but they may not be effective in the absence of honest, efficientinvestigative and judicial bodies.

A. Corruption in the Judiciary
The perception of corruption within the judiciary is very high in Madagascar despite the efforts put
forward by the Ministry of Justice.
The causes of such corruption are multiple:
1. Low Salaries
Prosecutors and judges as they are endowed with discretionary powers may be particularly vulnerable toattempts by powerful litigants to influence the outcome of cases where large funds are involved. Thus, itwould be important to ensure their financial security through adequate remuneration. Measures aiming at
enhancing their career development opportunities need to be considered. These equally apply to judicial
clerks and other administrative staff.
2. Lack of Training
Maintaining the professionalism in the service is an important key. Objective systems of recruitment andpromotion based on qualifications and performance, continuous training and promotion of ethics in the civil
service are some ways to do so. Efforts have been put forward to follow those standards.
In the context of the fight against corruption, prosecutors need to be highly competent. They need tolearn to be proactive and modernize their practice and methodology.
Judges need to be trained in judicial reasoning and in the exercise of judicial discretion. A system ofaccountability should exist in the application of law.

123

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No.71

Efforts need to be put forward to understand the new anti-corruption law and specifically the offences inorder to avoid different interpretations by the anti-corruption institutions.
3. Complex Judicial Procedures
The Malagasy legal system is an inheritance from the French colonization. Unfortunately, only a few
updates have been made and some legal texts do not fit in our modern context.
Outdated court procedures supported by archaic texts increase opportunities of corruption. Way too
many formal prerequisites decrease the accessibility of justice and in order to come to a fast resolution of acase, bribes are solicited and offered.
Effective measures would be judicial reforms aiming at increasing the accessibility of the public to legal
information, and making judicial procedures clearer and less complicated to encourage a speedy resolution of
disputes.
Alternative sources of dispute resolution should be promoted. In Madagascar, the public tend to view the
judicial system as the only way to resolve any disputes they may have and courts are crowded with many
minor cases.

B. Immunity of Some Public Officials
One of the issues in the Malagasy legal system that hinders the fight against corruption is the system of
immunity protecting some public officials.
This includes the police, the judiciary and state officials at all levels.
For example, unless he/she is caught committing a flagrant act of corruption, a policeman can only beprosecuted with the consent of the Police Minister. Experience has shown that this consent is very rarely
given. This system is also applied within other bodies of civil servants.
Only the Head of Prosecution in the Court of Appeal can prosecute some administrative authorities likeheads of provinces or prefects or members of the judiciary. Higher Magistrates need the consent of theJustice Minister.
Members of Parliament are also highly protected.
As for the President, the Prime Minister, members of the government and presidents of legislative
institutions, only the High Court of Justice is competent to hear their cases.
In order to fight efficiently against corruption, all these procedures need to be simplified in order toreduce impunity. In Madagascar, The High Court of Justice only exists in the Constitution. As for now, it has
not yet been established.
Some encouraging steps have been taken as the BIANCO is not bound by those limitations. It can hearanyone, regardless of his/her position. The problem lays at the prosecution stage. Empowering sufficiently
and appropriately prosecutors in charge of fighting corruption is definitely an important condition.

C. Independence of Anti-Corruption Investigators, Prosecutors and Judges
One of the feelings that prevail among the general public is the impunity of corruption perpetrators, eventhose that are notorious in the matter. Such impunity can be interpreted as the existence of interference ofpoliticians to protect those perpetrators from investigations or prosecution. The Judiciary then appears to bea mere executor of state policies, regardless of the interests of litigants.
In the Malagasy legal system, prosecutors are part of the Judiciary. Because they represent the society,they are directly under the authority of the Ministry of Justice. Their actions are strictly supervised and canbe guided by that authority. Those principles are stipulated in the Constitution. Only judges are independent.

124

EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE ON CORRUPTION CONTROL IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE

The BIANCO is totally independent in its actions. But as they refer cases for prosecution, the context isdifferent, hence the need to ensure the independence of prosecutorial services.
When the CPAC was created, in order to promote transparency in the prosecutorial process, instructions
from superiors were required to be in writing. In practice though, it appears difficult if not impossible for aprosecutor to ignore verbal instructions given the risk that it may engender for his/her career.

IV. CORRUPTION CASES IN MADAGASCAR
One of the reasons why such emphasis has been put lately on the fight against corruption is the negative
effects on the country’s economy.
Since the creation of the BIANCO and the CPAC, many corruption cases have been uncovered,prosecuted and the perpetrators have been sentenced with imprisonment and fines. Nevertheless the great
majority of these cases are related to petty corruption.

A. Petty Corruption
It is standard practice to pay bribes for the transportation of goods, a new permit, traffic violations, andeven a high school diploma in Madagascar. All fields of the public service are severely affected. Some cases
though are more recurrent than others.
1. Within the Police
Within the last ten months about seven Antananarivo police officers have been prosecuted by the CPACon corruption charges. Abuse of power, solicitation of bribes and extortion have been reported. Actually, the
BIANCO acts according to complaints and denunciations, and evidence is gathered mainly through a systemof “traps” that is actually admissible as evidence by the Court, as long as the willingness of the perpetrator
to commit the offence is proved.
2. Corruption in the Judiciary
Corruption acts in the Judiciary are committed by judicial clerks and Magistrates. Usually, the bribes thatare being paid are relatively small unless powerful litigants are involved. Only a few magistrates have been
officially prosecuted for corruption charges. Still, many have been sanctioned by the discipline board of theMagistrates’ Superior Council. In 2003, twelve of them were suspended for corrupt practices. Moremagistrates have since been sanctioned.

B. Serious Corruption
High level corruption involves high-ranking officials and the interests involved can be huge. It
undermines the State’s economy as public funds are being used in a personal and improper way. Althoughrare, a few cases have been uncovered and successfully prosecuted and this had a great impact on public
opinion and politicians
1. Corruption During Public Procurement Procedures
In the last few months, a couple of mayors and other administrative officials in charge of public
procurement procedures have been charged with embezzlement, corruption and favouritism. The
information came from anonymous denunciation or complaints. Some efforts need to be carried out in thismatter for the prosecution to be proactive and collaborate with commissions checking public procurement
procedures to detect irregularities deserving investigation.
2. Corruption Within Public Enterprises
In April 2005, the Administration Board of the Malagasy Post was prosecuted and found guilty ofcorruption acts as they improperly used their official position to the detriment of the Post for personalenrichment. This engendered a lot of controversies about the extent of the power of the Public Enterprises’
Administration Board.
3. Corruption Among Tax and Customs Officials
Important cases are currently underway involving high-ranking tax and customs officers charged with125

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No.71

corruption acts, falsification of public documents and embezzlement. These kinds of behaviour have a deep
impact on the country’s economy because funds that should be for the State’s reserve are either embezzled
or not collected efficiently because of corruption.

V. CONCLUSION
After the recent Anti-Corruption National Convention organized by the CSLCC, the motto that has been
adopted is “Free the Economy from Corruption”. The strategy for 2005-2007 has been renewed, after the
progress made during the first two years of the implementation of the strategy, the long term goal is toachieve a score of 7/10 in the Transparency International Corruption Perception Index. Emphasis has been
put on the judiciary and its major role in the fight against corruption. Plans have been made to dismantle theramparts of corruption within the judiciary in order accomplish the objectives of a clean and efficient justicesystem, respectful of human rights and safe for investors.
The anti-corruption institutions cannot eradicate corruption by themselves. They need the support of astrong political will, the help of international agencies and NGOs and the adherence of every single citizen.
Also, since corruption related crimes tend to be transnational, international judicial cooperation seems to bea key issue in order to efficiently fight against corruption. But as of now, only a very few cases, if no cases atall, have required such cooperation.

126

EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE ON CORRUPTION CONTROL IN CRIMINAL JUSTICEAPPENDIX
ANTI-CORRUPTION INDEPENDENT BUREAU
Investigation Department
Investigation Department Statistics
As to Sept, 28 2005
I. INVESTIGATION GROUP (IG)
September 2005
Number of Cases

Current

Processed
Procedures transmitted to courts

Received

Last monthleft overIn
Antananarivo

OutsideAntananarivo

NumberArrests

Suspects
in custody

Suspects notin custody

Reports

40

146

75

96

6

09

03

06

08

Overall Statistics
Procedures transmitted to courts

Number of Cases
Received

NumberArrests

Suspects
detained

Suspects
not detained

Reports

2005

350

74

145

63

76

84

2004

56

8

12

2

10

4

TOTAL

406

82

157

65

86

88

Kind of Complaints Received
SectorNumber%Justice922.50

State Institutions

6

15.00

National Gendarmerie

5

12.50

Financial Institutions

4

10.00

Administrative Services

3

7.50

National Police

2

5.00

Education

2

5.00

Internal Affairs Department

2

5.00

Decentralized Collectives

2

5.00

Health1

2.50

Land Administration

1

2.50

Public Construction

1

2.50

Private Sector

1

2.50

Public Procurement

1

2.50

TOTAL

40

100.00127

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No.71

II. OPERATIONAL SUPPORT GROUP
A. Reception and Process of Complaints
Complaints Received
Sept. 2005

2005

2004

TOTAL

Complaints Received

546

5250

813

6 063

Processed Complaints

242

4946

813

5 759

Complaints being Processed

304

304

0

304

Sept. 2005

2005

2004

TOTAL

For Investigation

12

350

56

406

For Information

8

242

35

277

TOTAL

20

592

91

683

Sept. 2005

2005

1. Land Conflict

52

863

2. Judiciary

44

554

3. Police Officers

36

592

4. Administrative Officers

32

525

5. Health and Education Field

15

273

6. Family and Social Matters

27

697

7. Customs and Ports Fields

444

8. Crime Commission

24

418

9. Others

8738

Sept. 2005

2005

2004

TOTAL

Antananarivo

128

2 992

572

3 564

Mahajanga

22

524

75

599

Toamasina

22

372

75

447

Toliara

21

523

23

546

Fianarantsoa

32

318

46

364

Antsiranana

17

217

22

239

Receivable Complaints
FilingReported Complaints
Object of Complaints

Geographical Origin of Complaints
Province

128

EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE ON CORRUPTION CONTROL IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Complaints Received (17 September 2004 - 28 September 2005)
2004

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Number of Complaints

37

221

355

200

2005

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

April

May

Jun.

Jul.

Aug.

Sept.

Number of Complaints

170

455

245

496

847

799

906

788

545

Number of Complants Received
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

Jun.

Jul.

Aug.

Sept.

B. Information Collection Activities
September 2005
Current

Left Overs

TreatedNumber of Cases
Received

In Tana

Outside TanaIn Tana

Outside Tana

Filed in database

Transmitted

33

12

37

42

27

–

23

Overall Statistics
OutputNumber of Cases
Received

Filed in Database

Transmitted

2005

328

76

123

2004

16

TOTAL

344

14
76

137

Declaration of Assets
Declaration of Assets Received up to 04/24/05

1 813

Declaration of Assets Received Since 04/24/05

4 423

Total

6 236

129

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No.71

C. Visitors
Visitors

Sept. 2005

2005

2004

TOTAL

Plaintiffs

310

2 726

301

3 027

Summoned

50

1 074

55

1 129

Others

313

3 650

390

4 040

TOTAL

673

7 450

746

8 196

D. Complaints Box
Number of Complaints

13082