18 April 2022

The 10th SIGLOC-online: Pre & Post Self-Evaluation Results
COIL Promotion OfficeOsaka Metropolitan University, Japan

1. Information on respondents:● Respondents are 83 participants who completed the 10th SIGLOC-online program held from 10th
June to 25th March 2022.
● Respondents evaluated their abilities related to Social Innovation before and after the program witha rubric having four (4) levels (Evaluation sheet is attached as a Reference).
● Respondents’ countries/regions in residence and universities
County/Regionin Residence

Number ofRespondentsUniversityUSA

Andrews University4BelarusBelarus State University of Economics

1MexicoBenemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla

3

Philippines

Central Mindanao University

1

Philippines

De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute3

Philippines

Dom Bosco Catholic University

1

Vietnam

Foreign Trade University

1

Indonesia

Gadjah Mada University

1

Kyrgyzstan

Institute of Japan Studies at the KSU I.Arabaev

1VietnamInternational University

1

Philippines

Kalinga state university2

Macau University of Science and Technology

4

Philippines

Mariano Marcos State University

31

Philippines

Mindanao State University

2

MexicoNational Autonomous University of Mexico

1

VietnamNong Lam University

1JapanOsaka City University

5JapanOsaka Prefecture University

1

Philippines

Romblon State University1Malaysia

Saito University College

1

Philippines

San Pedro College1

Philippines

St. Paul University Philippines

2

Indonesia

Universitas Andalas

1

Malaysia

Universiti Teknologi MARA

6

University of Sao Paulo

1

Philippines

University of the Immaculate Conception

2

TaiwanWenzao ursuline university of languages

2

West Visayas State University

2

Macau

BrazilPhilippines
TotalTotal

83

2. Overall result● Below are the “Overall average scores of respondents by question (ability)”.

3. Results by Question (Ability)
Q1: Ability to acquire basic knowledge
Criteria

Ability for basic understanding of problems

No. of Respondents
PrePostLevel 1Acceptable

To be able to find and review literature on social sustainability

312

Level 2Satisfactory

To be able to select appropriate literature on social sustainability

179Level 3
Good

To be able to select appropriate literature on social sustainability
and explain its significance and usefulness in a way that others canunderstand.

30

21

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to select appropriate literature on social sustainability
and explain its significance and usefulness in a way that others canunderstand at a high level

3340

3.12

3.09

Average Score-0.03

Q2: Ability for basic understanding
Criteria

Ability to discover/identify issues

Level 1
Acceptable

No. of Respondents
PrePostTo be able to logically develop an argument for a position based ona variety of literature and data

49

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to evaluate an argument based on a particular position
from different perspectives

20

12

Level 3Good

To be able to have a holistic perspective of the various logicalconstructs in various positions and clarify their mutual relationships

3019

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to have a holistic perspective of the various logicalconstructs in various positions and clarify their mutual relationships
at a high level33423.01

3.15

Average Score+0.14

Q3: Ability to discover/identify issues
Criteria

Ability to find creative solutions

Level 1
Acceptable

No. of Respondents
Pre

Post

To be able to explain to others about your own experiences and thecurrent situation in exisiting communities from the perspective ofsustainability

39

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to understand the sustainability of others’ communities
from multiple perspectives, including your own

1615

Level 3
GoodTo discuss and discover what is needed to improve thesustainability of your own community from multiple perspectives

3417

Level 4
Excellent

To discuss and discover what is needed to improve thesustainability of your own community from multiple perspectives ata high level

30

41

3.10

3.10

Average Score

0.00
Q4: Ability to find creative solutions
Criteria

Ability to implement solutions(Collaboration/ Collective impact)

Level 1
Acceptable

No. of Respondents
Pre

Post

To be able to understand existing communities from a global
perspective and discover real-world examples that can be used as
reference in order to improve their sustainability

511

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to find approaches and apply them in order to improve
the sustainability of existing communities based on a variety ofreal-world examples

2112

Level 3Good

To be able to evaluate and improve approaches for applying
various real-world examples in order to improve the sustainability ofexisting communities from an objective and holistic perspective

3624

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to evaluate and improve approaches for applying
various real-world examples in order to improve the sustainability ofexisting communities from an objective and holistic perspective at ahigh level

2135

2.88

3.01

Average Score+0.13

Q5: Ability to implement solutions
Criteria

Leadership

Level 1
Acceptable

No. of Respondents
PrePostTo be able to identify issues and find creative solutions based oninteraction with others

58

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to make the most of interactions with others when youidentify issues and find creative solutions

2111

Level 3Good

To be able to propose specific approaches for creative activities
through interaction with others

3426

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to propose specific approaches for creative activities
through interaction with others at a high level

2337

2.90

3.12

Average Score+0.22
Q6: Leadership (Number of the respondents for Post-course was 37 only.)No. of Respondents
Criteria

Leadership

Level 1
Acceptable

Pre

Post

To be able to collaboratively work with others to complete assigned
tasks

31Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to achieve given goals as a group member

185

Level 3Good

To be able to achieve given goals as a group leader

318

Level 4Excellent

To be able to generate goals the group needs to achieve, sharethose goals, and work together to accomplish them

31

23

3.08

3.43

Average Score+0.35
Q7: Contributions (Number of the respondents for Post-course was 37 only.)
Criteria

No. of RespondentsLeadership

Pre

Post

Level 1
Acceptable

To be able to make a minimal contribution to the outcome of thegroup work

1

1

Level 2
Satisfactory

To be able to make a sufficient contribution to the outcome of thegroup work

13

3

Level 3Good

To be able to make more than sufficient contributions to theoutcome of the group work32

8

Level 4
Excellent

To be able to make excellent contributions to the outcome of thegroup work

3725

3.27

3.54

Average Score+0.27

Reference: SIGLOC-online Self-Evaluation Form
Pre & Post course Self-Evaluation Form: Please read carefully each criteria and description for each levelin the table below. Choose the most appropriate one to describe your current level of understanding.

Criteria

Level 4
Excellent

Level 3
Good

Level 2
Satisfactory

Level 1
Acceptable

Q1

Ability to acquirebasic knowledge

To be able to selectappropriate literature
on social sustainabilityand explain its
significance andusefulness in a waythat others canunderstand at a highlevel

To be able to selectappropriate literature
on social sustainability
and explain its
significance andusefulness in a waythat others canunderstandTo be able to selectappropriate literature
on social sustainability

To be able to find andreview literature onsocial sustainability

Q2

Ability for basic
understanding

To be able to have aholistic perspective of
the various logicalconstructs in various
positions and clarify
their mutual
relationships at a highlevel

To be able to have aholistic perspective of
the various logicalconstructs in various
positions and clarify
their mutual
relationships

To be able to evaluate
an argument based ona particular position
from different
perspectives

To be able to logicallydevelop an argument
for a position based ona variety of literatureand dataQ
3

Ability to
discover/identify issues

To discuss anddiscover what isneeded to improve thesustainability of yourown community frommultiple perspectives
at a high level

To discuss anddiscover what isneeded to improve thesustainability of yourown community frommultiple perspectives

To be able tounderstand thesustainability of others’communities frommultiple perspectives,including your own

To be able to explain toothers about your own
experiences and thecurrent situation in
exisiting communities
from the perspective ofsustainability

Q4

Ability to findcreativesolutions

To be able to evaluate
and improve
approaches for
applying various
real-world examples inorder to improve thesustainability ofexisting communities
from an objective andholistic perspective at ahigh level

To be able to evaluate
and improve
approaches for
applying various
real-world examples inorder to improve thesustainability ofexisting communities
from an objective andholistic perspective

To be able to findapproaches and apply
them in order toimprove thesustainability ofexisting communities
based on a variety ofreal-world examples

To be able tounderstand existing
communities from a
global perspective anddiscover real-world
examples that can beused as reference inorder to improve theirsustainability

Q5

Ability to
implement
solutions

To be able to propose
specific approaches forcreative activities
through interaction withothers at a high level

To be able to propose
specific approaches forcreative activities
through interaction withothers

To be able to make themost of interactions
with others when you
identify issues and findcreative solutions

To be able to identify
issues and findcreative solutions
based on interaction
with others

Q6

Leadership

To be able to generategoals the group needs
to achieve, share thosegoals, and work
together to accomplish
them

To be able to achieve
given goals as a groupleaderTo be able to achieve
given goals as a groupmemberTo be able tocollaboratively workwith others to complete
assigned tasks

Q7

Contributions

To be able to makeexcellent contributions
to the outcome of thegroup work

To be able to makemore than sufficient
contributions to theoutcome of the groupwork

To be able to make asufficient contribution
to the outcome of thegroup work

To be able to make aminimal contribution tothe outcome of thegroup work