JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the project3MW Solar Power Project Utilizing Farmland in
Valparaiso Region

Reference number

CL003

Third-party entity (TPE)

Japan Quality Assurance Organization (JQA)(TPE-CL-002)

Project participant contracting the TPE

FARMLAND Co., Ltd.

Date of completion of this report

14/03/2024

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed using
document form
the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to the typeof project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology andapproved JCM that the applied version is valid at the time of submission of
methodology
the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
Emission
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in thesourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposedemission
JCM project.
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante
listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental impact
impactassessment, if required by the Republic of Chile, in line withassessment
Chilean procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
stakeholder
consultation process and that due steps were taken to engage
1JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Name

Company

Schemecompetence*

Function*

Mr.
Hiroshi
Team
JQA
Ms.
Motokawa
LeaderMr.
TamamiTeam
JQA
Ms.
Nagayama
MemberMr.
SachikoInternal
JQA
Ms.
Hashizume
ReviewerMr.
Ms.
Please specify the following for each item.

Technical
competence*On-sitevisit

Authorized
Authorized* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader, teammember, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
In this report, the validation team (hereinafter, the team) validates two versions of PDD, theversion 01.0 submitted for validation (hereinafter, the PDD), and the version 02.0 revised
during the validation and dated 12/03/2024 (hereinafter, the revised PDD).
Regarding the documents referred to in this report, the same applies to the Monitoring Plan
Sheet (i.e., the MPS and the revised MPS), Monitoring Structure Sheet (the MSS and therevised MSS) and the Modalities of Communication (the MoC).
By reviewing the PDD, it is checked and confirmed that the PDD is completed using the latest
version of the PDD form (JCM_CL_F_PDD_ver02.0) appropriate to the type of project anddrafted

in

line

with

JCM

GuidelinesforDeveloping

PDD

and

MR,

JCM_CL_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0 (hereinafter, the guidelines).
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concludes that the PDD is completed using the valid form and drafted in line with3

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

the guidelines.
C.2. Project description<Means of validation>
The proposed JCM project is “3MW Solar Power Project Utilizing Farmland in Valparaiso
Region” (hereinafter, the project). The project aims to reduce CO2 emissions and to promoterenewable energy and agrivoltaics in Chile by introducing (i) a 3MW solar power plant at
farmland in Valparaiso Region and (ii) a 20kW agrivoltaic pilot facility at an experimental farmin Maule Region.
The starting date of project operation is 23/11/2023 and the expected operational lifetime ofthe project is 17 years.
The team conducted the following process to validate the accuracy and completeness of the
project description;1) Desk review the documents and photos and identification of points to check during the onsite visit,
2) On-site visit at the project sites during the period from 10/01/2024 to 15/01/2024, including
the interviews with the PPs and stakeholders,
3) CARs/CLs identification and solution.
Issues were raised.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
< CAR01 >The team confirms that the descriptions in A.3 include the coordinates of the two project sites.
However, each of them doesn't indicate the correct location of the project site.
< PP response to this issue >The coordinates of the two sites were corrected in A.3 as follows:(i) 33°38'19.9"S, 71°27'32.5"W(ii) 35°41'45.9"S, 71°40'59.8"W< Assessment of PP response >The team confirmed that the PPs corrected the coordinates in the revised PDD appropriately.
This issue was therefore closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concludes that the project description in the revised PDD is accurate and complete.
C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>4

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The project applies the approved methodology, CL_AM001 Ver2.0, “Installation of Solar PV
System” (hereinafter, the methodology).
The team confirms that;
1) The applied version of the methodology is valid, by checking the JCM website at the timeof submitting the project for validation,2) The methodology is correctly quoted and applied, by comparing the PDD with the actual
text of the methodology,3) The project meets each of the eligibility criterion of the methodology, by reviewing therelevant documentation, including the documentation referenced in the PDD, and by reviewing
comparable information as deemed necessary.
The validation for each eligibility requirement is given below.
Criterion 1: The project newly installs solar PV system(s).
The PDD states as project information for this criterion in the section of B.2. “Solar PV systemsof 3MW and 20kW are newly installed for the project sites (i) and (ii) respectively”.
By reviewing the photos taken before/after the project construction, conducting the on-site visit
and interviewing with the PPs/stakeholders, the team confirms that the project newly installs
solar PV system(s).
Criterion 2: The PV modules are certified for design qualifications (IEC 61215,IEC 61646 or
IEC 62108) and safety qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2).
The PDD states in B.2. “The PV modules installed at the project sites (i) and (ii) are certified
for design qualifications (IEC 61215) and safety qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 617302).”
By reviewing the certificates issued by Tuev Rheinland (No. PV50456702, dated 08/25/2020)and Tuev Sud (No. Z2 086674 0010 Rev. 02, dated 06/07/2021, valid until 04/07/2026), it isconfirmed that installed PV modules are certified for design qualifications (IEC 61215, IEC
61646 or IEC 62108) and safety qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2).
Criterion 3: The equipment used for monitoring output power of the solar PV system(s) andirradiance is installed at the project site.
The PDD states in B.2. “The equipment used for monitoring output power of the solar PV
systems and irradiance has been installed at each of the project sites (i) and (ii)”.
By the on-site visit, the team confirms that the equipment, i.e. electricity meter andpyranometer, is installed at each project site.
The team therefore concludes that the project meets all of the above criteria.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
5

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team confirms that the project meets all eligibility criteria of the applicable version of themethodology in a valid status at the time the project is submitted for validation. Therefore, theteam concludes that the project is eligible for applying the methodology.
C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>
The MPS was prepared and submitted for validation by using JCM_CL_AM001_Ver02.0. The
team confirms that the MPS is not altered, and its required fields are appropriately filled in linewith the methodology and the guidelines.
By reviewing the single line diagrams, the layout drawing and other relevant documents of the
project sites and by conducting the on-site visit, the team confirms that
- The solar PV system(s) of the project is connected to a regional grid directly without any
captive power generator,- All the emission sources covered by the methodology are included and- There are no other emission sources at the project sites to be considered in the project ER
calculation.
The methodology states the parameter, EFER,i, is set as per the connected regional grid, i.e.
National System, Aysén System, Magallanes System.
By reviewing the project site locations and regional map of Chile, and by interviewing with thePPs, the team confirms that
- Both project sites are included in the area of National System and- Accordingly, EFRE,i is set at 0.404 tCO2/MWh in line with the methodology.
The value of Σ EGi,p, to be fixed ex post, is set at 5,930.85 MWh/p in the MPS(input) for ER
estimate. By reviewing its calculation process and relevant documents, the team confirms that
- This value is derived from the estimation using solar power generation simulation softwareand- The simulation is properly performed by setting many parameters and attempting to makerealistic estimates.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team reaches the conclusion that the selected emission sources and GHG types are justified
6

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

for the project. The team assesses the estimated values for project specific parameters in the
MPS including intermediate processes to derive the values. As a result, the values are
considered reasonable in the context of the project.
C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>"Decree 40, Approves Regulations for the Environmental Impact Assessment System(Publication Date: 12/08/2013), Ministry of the Environment" indicates that the project is NOT
subject to an environmental impact assessment.
In addition, by interviewing with the PPs and reviewing the approval letter from theenvironment authority, the team confirms that what is stated in the above law is directly
applicable to the project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concluded that the PP did not conduct the EIA as it was not required and that it
followed the procedures required by the Republic of Chile.
C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
By reviewing the relevant documents and interviews with the PPs and stakeholders, the teamconfirms that the date, time, venue, participants, summary of the comments received at the
Local stakeholder consultation (hereinafter, LSC), and due account of all comments received
are consistent with those provided in the PDD.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
<CAR02>The PP lists all stakeholders invited by the PP in the PDD, whether or not they attended theLSC. The PP also invited stakeholders who did not attend the LSC to comment after the LSC.
The team requests the PPs to address the following;
1) Stakeholders who actually attended the LSC are to be indicated in the PDD,
2) The attendee list provided to the team as one of the pieces of evidence for the LSC includes"Regional Ministerial Secretariat (SEREMI) of Valparaiso". However, this organization does
not appear in the PDD,
3) Mr Felipe Ramirez of INIA, who was interviewed by the team as a participant in the LSC,
7

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

is not included in the attendee list.
< PP response to this issue >Stakeholders attended to the LSC and those not attended were clarified in the PDD.
Additionally, the list of attendees was corrected to include Mr. Felipe Ramirez. SEREMI wasfound to have been abolished after listing invitees. The list of invitees was modified to clarify
the above-mentioned fact.
< Assessment of PP response >The team confirms all points 1)-3) were addressed appropriately considering the team's
comments.
This issue is therefore closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concludes that the LSC of the project has completed adequately and the process andinformation considered above are stated in the revised PDD.
C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
By reviewing the specifications of installed electricity meters and conducting the on-site visit,
the team confirms the following specifications of the electricity meters:< (i) Valparaiso Region >- Model: METSEION7400- Serial No. MR-2010C784-02- Accuracy class: Class 0.2< (ii) Maule Region >- Model: DTSD1352-C- Serial No. 122123300890124- Accuracy class: 0.5S.
By reviewing the calibration certificates of electricity meters installed at the project sites (i)and (ii), the team confirms that those calibrations conducted before/after the shipping show thatthe instrumental errors stay within the required level of accuracy.
By the interview with the PPs and on-site visit, the team confirms that the PPs check the data
daily recorded by the cloud system and prepare the monitoring report continuously, and that
the PPs review the situation and give the necessary instructions to the contractor of the projectequipment when the PPs find any problem with the monitoring equipment or data.
Considering the above-mentioned statement, the team confirms the means of implementation
8

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

of the monitoring plan, including the data management and quality assurance and quality
control procedures, are sufficient for ex post reporting and verification, in line with themethodology.
By reviewing the MPS and relevant documents, the team confirms that;
1) All the parameters are listed in the MPS appropriately based on the methodology,
2) Monitoring information described in the MPS(input) complies with the requirements of themethodology,
3) Monitoring point and the type of monitoring equipment, i.e., electricity meter, are illustrated
in the figure of C.2.
The Monitoring Structure Sheet (MSS) stated the following in the MPS:
- Project Manager (Farmland),
Project manager is responsible for project planning, implementation, monitoring results andreporting;- Project supervisor (Farmland),Farmland 1) checks the data recorded via remote monitoring system and 2) gives instructions
to the contractor for operation and maintenance if there is a problem with the monitoring
equipment or data;- Local project supervisor (Farmdo Energy Chile);
Farmdo Energy Chile 1) checks the data recorded via remote monitoring system and 2) gives
instructions to the contractor for operation and maintenance if there is a problem with themonitoring equipment or data,- Operator,
The contractor performs daily maintenance and responds to problems with the monitoring
equipment or data.
Two issues were raised.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
< CAR03 >By interviewing with "Local project supervisor" and "Operator", the team finds that;
1) Daily operation is not implemented by "Operator", it is implemented remotely through thecloud system by the supervisor,
2) The respective role of the local project supervisor and the project supervisor is not the same.
The PPs are requested to revise the MSS considering team's findings.

9

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0< PP response to this issue >The MSS was revised considering the TPE's findings.
- Project manager [FARMLAND Co., Ltd.]
Project manager is responsible for project planning, implementation, monitoring result andreporting.
- Project supervisor [FARMLAND Co., Ltd.]
Project supervisor is responsible for 1) checking the data recorded through the cloud system
for remote monitoring, 2) preparing monitoring report, and 3) giving instructions to the local
project participants for operation and maintenance if there is a problem with the monitoring
equipment or data.
- Local project supervisor [Land and Sea SpA or Farmdo Energy Chile SpA]
Local project supervisor is responsible for maintaining equipment and emergency responding
to equipment failure in cooperation with local contractors.
< Assessment of PP response >The team confirms that
1) The role of the Project Supervisor has been revised accordingly, taking into account the
team's comments,
2) The role of the local project manager has also been revised to take account of the team's
comments, and it is distinct from that of the project supervisor.
Thus, this issue is closed.
< CL01 >Regarding the measurement methods and procedures of EGi,p, the PPs describes as below.
The electricity meters are replaced or calibrated at an interval following the regulations in Chileas shown below:- Frequency of calibration is every 7 years; and- Frequency of replacement is every 15 years.
The first calibration dates are 30/10/2020 and 16/02/2023 for the project sites (i) and (ii),respectively.
By interviewing the PPs, it is confirmed that the PPs have not yet decided whether to replaceor calibrate electricity meters, or both, although the MPS states in column (h) that the electricity
meters are to be replaced or calibrated at an interval following the regulations in Chile.
The PPs are requested to clarify the following,
1) What is the current monitoring plan to be described in column (h) regarding the
replacement/calibration,2) How the calibration dates are relevant to the current monitoring plan to be described incolumn (h).
10JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0< PP response to this issue >Description in (h) column was revised in the revised MPS to clarify that necessary steps will
be taken following the regulations in Chile.
< Assessment of PP response >The team confirmed that the descriptions was appropriately revised in the revised MPS
considering the team's comments by focusing on what is relevant and what is clear at the
moment.
Thus, this issue is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concludes that the monitoring plan described in the revised MPS complies with therequirements of the methodology and the guidelines, and that the PPs have ability to implement
the described monitoring plan including feasibility of monitoring structure.
C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
By checking the version and information in the MoC, it is confirmed that the latest version of
the form (JCM_CL_F_MoC_ver01.0) is used.
By directly reviewing personal business cards, relevant websites and specimen signatures, it isconfirmed that all corporate and personal details described in the MoC are valid and accurate,
and that the MoC is correctly completed and duly authorized.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concludes that the MoC complied with all relevant forms and requirements.
C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
By reviewing the relevant websites (e.g. CDM website, Markit Environmental Registry, etc.)
and the Section 7 of the MoC, the team confirms that the project is not registered under otherinternational climate mitigation mechanisms.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
11JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concludes that the project is not registered under the other international climate
mitigation mechanisms.
C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
By reviewing the relevant documents provided by the PPs, it is confirmed that
1) The interconnection date agreed by a distribution company is 16/11/2023, i.e. the stating
date of project operation stated in the PDD, which does not predate January 1, 2013,
2) The plant commenced its operation on 20/11/2023.
An issue was raised.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
< CL02 >By reviewing the relevant documents for PMGD Malvilla and interviewing with the PPs, theteam confirms the following:
1) FORMULARIO 20 VALIDACIÓN DE NOTIFICACIÓN CONEXIÓN PROYECTOPMGD Malvilla (FORM 20 NOTIFICATION VALIDATION CONNECTION PROJECTPMGD Malvilla) indicates interconnection date agreed by a distribution company is November
16th, 2023,
2) FORMULARIO21 PROTOCOLO DE PURESTA EN SERVICIO Malvilla (Form 21
Commissioning Protocol) indicates that the plant was commissioned on November 20th, 2023,
in the presence of the signatories; the distribution company and PMGD installer, PMGD
constructor, and PMGD operator Farmdo Energy Chile, SpA.
By reviewing the monitored data, the team confirms that the PPs have been monitoring fulldaily generation since 23rd November, prior to which only partial data was available.
Considering the above-mentioned confirmations, it is not clearly explained why the starting
date of the project operation is set at November 16th, 2023.
< PP response to this issue >The starting date of project operation was corrected as 23/11/2023 in A.5 of the PDD.
Following that, the amount of estimated emissions reductions in 2023 was corrected in C.3.
< Assessment of PP response >The team confirms that the starting date of project operation was revised accordingly in therevised PDD, taking into account the team's comments.
The amount of estimated emission reductions in 2023 was revised accordingly in Section C.3of the revised PDD to reflect the change in the start date.
This issue is therefore closed.
12

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team confirms that the starting date of project operation in the PDD is determined
appropriately.
C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No other issue was identified.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Not applicable.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
Not applicable.

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
The PDD had been publicly available for 30 days between 14/11/2023 and 13/12/2023 to invite
public inputs on the JCM website, https://www.jcm.go.jp/cl-jp/projects/116.
No public comments were received.

D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
No action was required to be taken into due account by the project participants.

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees- Mr.Yusuke Murota, General Manager, Overseas Business Department, Farmland Co., Ltd. /Director, Farmdo Energy Chile SpA- Ms. Andrades Fernandez Laura, Manager, Overseas Business Department, Farmland Co., Ltd.
- Mr. Javier Lorenzo Campos Carcamo, CEO, Land and Sea SpA / CEO, Farmdo Energy Chile13

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

SpA- Mr. Jorge Humberto Leal Saldivia, Co-founder, Land and Sea SpA- Mr. Jaoquin Felipe Campos Silva, Project Manager, Land and Sea SpA- Mr. Jorge Rios Julio, Developer, Land and Sea SpA- Mr. Javier Dominguez, General Manager, AGRICOLA SANTA TERESA SpA- Mr. Claudio Prieto, General Manager, AGRICOLA SANTA TERESA SpA- Mr. Juan Carrasco, Electrico Penablanca- Mr. Richard Oviedo Silva, Electrico Penablanca- Ms. Dominga Astaburuaga, Journalist, INIA
- Mr. Felipe Ramirez Contreras Agronomo, INIA
- Mr. Gonzalo Lillo V., Administrator, INIA
- Ms. Kei Sakakibara, Manager, Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC

E.2. List of documents received
1. Project Design Document (JCM_CL003_PDD_draft.pdf)
2. Project Design Document (JCM_CL003_PDD_ver02.0.docx)
3. Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (JCM_CL003_MPS_draft.xlsx)
4. Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (JCM_CL003_MPS_ver02.0.xlsx)
5. Modalities of communications statement (JCM_CL_F_MoC_ver01.0_09112023,pdf)
6. JCM Approved Methodology CL_AM001 Ver2.0, Installation of Solar PV System(JCM_CL_AM001_ver02.0.pdf)
7. Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (JCM_CL_AM001_ver02.0.xlsx)
8. JCM Glossary of Terms (JCM_CL_Glossary_ver01.0.pdf)
9. JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring Report(JCM_CL_GL_PDD_ver02.0.pdf)
10. JCM Project Cycle Procedure (JCM_CL_PCP_ver02.0.pdf)
11. JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification (JCM_CL_GL_VV_ver01.0.pdf)
12. JCM Modalities of Communication Statement Form (JCM_CL_F_MoC_ver01.0.pdf)
13. JCM Project Design Document Form (JCM_CL_F_PDD_ver02.0.docx)
14. JCM Validation Report Form (JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0.docx)
15. JCM website of project information, https://www.jcm.go.jp/cl-jp/projects/116
16.JCM website of JCM_CL_AM001, https://www.jcm.go.jp/cl-jp/methodologies/124
17. Specifications or catalogues of the solar power systems including the solar modules,
pyranometers, inverters, electricity meters, data logger and cloud systems for remotemonitoring systems using data loggers/PC work stations installed at the project sites (i) and14

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0(ii), respectively.
18. Single line diagrams of the project sites indicating all the lines connected with the grid(s)and captive generator at the project sites (i) and (ii), respectively.
19. Location of the project sites shown by Google Map.
20. The Project Completion Report.
21. Organization info of Land and Sea SpA.
22. Organization info of Farmdo Energy Chile SpA.
23. Organization info of FARMLAND Co., Ltd., https://farmdo.com/en/company.html
24. Forms indicating the starting date of project operation; FORM 20 NOTIFICATIONVALIDATION CONNECTION PROJECT PMGD Malvilla and Form 21 Commissioning
Protocol for project site (i) Malvilla, Connection Protocol Form for project site (ii) Maule.
25. Legal lifetime of the installed equipment under Japanese tax regulation, 17 years,
https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=340M50000040015
26. Project site photos/drawing before and after the newly installation of solar PV systems of
3MW and 20kW for the project sites (i) and (ii), respectively.
27. Models and types of the equipment installed at the project sites including the monitoring
instruments.
28. Certificates for design qualifications (IEC 61215, IEC 61646 or IEC 62108) and safety
qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2)
29. Layout drawing and photos of the project equipment for the project sites (i) ad (ii),respectively
30. Environmental Relevance Report on San Antonio Malvilla Solar Park Project 2.99MW andDocuments indicating the decision of environmental impact assessment according to nationalor local regulations in Chile by Environmental Assessment Service, Valparaiso Region.
31. LSC (Local Stakeholder Consultation) documents including invitation mail, presentationmaterials, minutes, and list of attendance.
32. Monthly electricity generation calculation sheet indicating data source of the value, Σ EG,ip, 5930.85 MWh/p in the MPS(input).
33. Regulations in Chile that determine the frequency of calibration and replacement ofelectricity meters.
34. Calibration certificates of electricity meters installed at the project sites (i) and (ii),respectively.
35. Copies of Business cards and signatures of the personnel shown in the MoC.

15

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers.

Statement of competence
Name:

Mr. Hiroshi Motokawa

Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Function
Date of qualification
Validator

2014/12/22

Verifier

2014/12/22

Team leader

2014/12/22

Technical area within sectoral scopes
Date of qualification
TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2014/12/22

TA 1.2. Renewables

2014/12/22

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2014/12/22

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production

2014/12/22

TA 5.1. Chemical industry
TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas
TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater
TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation

2014/12/22-

Statement of competence
Name:

Ms. Sachiko Hashizume

Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Function
Date of qualification
Validator

2015/11/20

Verifier

2015/11/20

Team leader

2018/6/22

Technical area within sectoral scopes
Date of qualification
TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2015/11/20

TA 1.2. Renewables

2015/11/20

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2015/11/20

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production-

TA 5.1. Chemical industry-

TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas
TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater
TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation

2015/11/20-

16