SRDF: Extracting Lexical Knowledge Graph for Preserving Sentence
Meaning
Sangha Nam, GyuHyeon Choi, Younggyun Hahm, and Key-Sun Choi
Machine Reading Lab, School of Computing,
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST),
Daejeon, Republic of Korea{nam.sangha, wiany11, hahmyg, kschoi}@kaist.ac.kr
Abstract
In this paper, we present an open information extraction system so-called SRDF that generates
lexical knowledge graphs from unstructured texts. In semantic web, knowledge is expressed inthe RDF triple form but the natural language text consist of multiple relations between arguments.
For this reason, we combine open information extraction with the reification for the full text
extraction to preserve the meaning of sentences in our knowledge graph. And also our knowledge
graph is designed to adapt for many existing semantic web applications. At the end of this paper,
we introduce the result of an experiment and a Korean template generation module developed
using SRDF.

1Introduction

The web contains enormous information in the form of unstructured text. In recent years, Open Information Extraction (IE) based on self-supervised learning has become more strongly suggested to overcome
limitations of traditional IE system, and it is now possible to process massive text corpora. However,early Open IE systems fall short of representing multiple relations between arguments within a sentence
since they are designed to focus on binary extractions. This causes incomplete and insufficient extraction. To overcome this limitations, Kraken(Akbik and Löser, 2012), OLLIE(Mausam et al., 2012) andClausIE(Del Corro and Gemulla, 2013) are designed to extract a set of arguments using dependencyparsing and then represent the extracted knowledge as ternary or N-ary form.
Consider, for example, the sentence “Marsel was established by the British government with the helpof American policymakers in 1971 as the nation’s first research oriented science institution.”. Current
Open IE systems focus on extracting triples; (Marsel, was established by, the British government) and(Marsel, was established in, 1971). Even if these systems extract multiple triples, there is still missing
information. The arguments ‘help of American policymakers’ and ‘the nation’s first research oriented
science institution’ are also important and necessary information for a question answering system whena question becomes more complicated. Furthermore, it is important to represent extracted knowledge for
applying to existing semantic web applications.
In this paper, we propose an Open Information Extraction system so-called SRDF that generates lexical knowledge graph from unstructured texts. SRDF differs from other Open IE systems in terms of full
sentence extraction and knowledge representation in reified triple form. In semantic web, knowledge iscommonly expressed in RDF triple form that consists of subject, predicate and object. However, there area lot of cases that multiple relations between arguments are associated within a sentence. The purpose ofSRDF is to make a bridge between text and triple by the lexical knowledge graph. Not only does SRDF
knowledge graph (KG) reflect the dependency structure of a sentence but can also be used in a variety ofsemantic web applications such as question answering.

2

What is SRDF?

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/License details: http://77
Proceedings of the Open Knowledge Base and Question Answering (OKBQA) Workshop,pages 77–81, Osaka, Japan, December 11 2016.

Figure 1: Example of SRDF knowledge graph
Extracting ontological triples directly from the text needs many steps such as entity linking, disambiguation and predicate linking, and also needs many resources like Wordnet. Nevertheless, usual performanceis still unsatisfiable because the whole process is complicated and errors of each step propagating to thenext step. That is why Open IE has been researched.
The purpose of SRDF generates a lexical knowledge graph as a bridge between text and triple. SRDF
means sentence-based lexical knowledge graph structure. SRDF structure serves three purposes. First,
it translates an input sentence to reified triple form with simple and concise rules and reflects the dependency structure of the sentence. Second, it supports handling both entity-centric and event-centric facts.
Third, it is designed to be used in various semantic web applications.
As mentioned earlier, multiple arguments and relations are presented within a sentence, so we design
our structure using Singleton Property(Nguyen et al., 2014) - the new method of reification. The mainidea of Singleton Property is that every relationship is universally unique, so the predicate between two
particular entities can be a key for any triple.
Figure 1 is an example of SRDF a knowledge graph from the sentence described in the introduction.
As shown in Figure 1, SRDF follows a triple form. The reason for taking triple form is a versatility.
Triple is the simplest semantic web representation form, moreover many semantic web applicationssuch as knowledge base and question answering systems take the triple form. Therefore we extract theknowledge in triple form for integration with existing applications easily. As a knowledge graph, SRDF
also consists of triples but of different properties followed by:– Subject can only be the subject of the sentence or reified predicate.
– Predicate can only be the verb group of the sentence or pre/postposition of its objects.
– Object can only be the noun group or ANONYMOUS.

3Overview and Workflow Description

SRDF system simply receives input as a text and outputs an extracted set of reified triples. Our system
operates through three steps of procedure in total that are Preprocessor, Basic Skeleton Tree (BST)
generator, and SRDF generator. Detailed explanations are following as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: System architecture of SRDF

Figure 3: Example of chunk-based
dependency structure78

Figure 4: Three examples of Basic Skeleton Tree in SRDF

Figure 5: Example of SRDF reified triple generation
3.1

Preprocessor

Preprocessor consists of three sub-modules which are Sentence segmentor, Chunker, and Dependency
parser. Sentence segmentor divides a sentence into its component sentences and attaches the subject
to divided sentences. Chunker returns only noun phrases and verb groups. Noun phrases can containadnominal phrase and verb groups could contain adverb phrase. Then, dependency parser outputs achunk-based dependency structure like figure 3.
3.2

Basic Skeleton Tree Generator

BST generator takes an input as a chunk-based dependency structure and outputs a BST. Chunk-based
dependency structure strongly depends on charasteristics of languages. For example, dependency structure of English, Korean and Chinese are different from one another. Therefore we make an intermediatestructure between chunk-based dependency structure and SRDF. BST would be almost the same structure
for any language could be adjusted to SRDF generation rules as well.
Figure 4 is examples of the Basic Skeleton Tree. BST has five layers; root-VG, VG, NP, preposition
and recursion layer. Root-VG layer is the top layer and has only one node that is root verb group ondependency structure. NP layer contains all noun phrases including subject of the sentence. VG layer
is placed between the root-VG and the NP layer. There could be more than one VG layers relying on
depth of corresponding verb groups in chunk-based dependency structure. Preposition layer contains
only preposition of its noun phrase and be placed over the NP layer. Recursion layer decomposes nounphrase with more detail when it contains adnominal phrase.
3.3

SRDF Generator

SRDF generator takes an input as a BST and outputs a lexical knowledge graph as reified triple form
using our simple and concise algorithm as shown in Algorithm 1. It takes a graph G, a subject ofsentence sbj, a root verb group pred, and child nodes of root verb group objQueue as input and returns
G. For each obj in objQueue, check whether it is in NP layer or not. If the obj is in NP layer, make atriple and insert it to graph G (Line 4). If not, make an ANON triple and insert it to G and then change
sbj and pred respectively for reification (Line 6 to 8). And then, call generateSRDF function recursively(Line 9). Figure 5 is an example of our algorithm about the third BST in Figure 4.
79

Algorithm 1 SRDF reified triple generation algorithm
1: procedure GENERATE SRDF(G, SBJ , PRED , OBJ Q UEUE )2:for obj in objQueue do3:
if obj is in NP layer then4:
G ← G ∪ {<sbj,pred,obj>} . Overwrite ANON object with the same sbj and pred
5:
else
6:
G ← G ∪ {<sbj,pred,ANON>}7:
sbj ← pred8:
pred ← obj
9:generateSRDF(G, sbj, pred, obj.children)
10:
return G
Table 1: Results of experiments.
Precision

RecallCompleteness0.74
301/4070.75
251/336

0.93
128/137

4Experiments and Application

4.1

Experiments

The performance of SRDF system has been evaluated with randomly sampled sentences from featured
article in Korean Wikipedia. The evaluation results have been assessed by two human evaluators basedon the precision, recall and the number of extractions. As shown in Table 1, our system extracted 407
triples from 137 sentences. The precision is 74% and the recall is 75%. The completeness means if all
the information is extracted as triples from an input sentence or not. Overall completeness is 93%. We
found that the 7% of incomplete extractions is caused by the Korean Analyzer, especially a problem ofcorrectly finding the subject of a given sentence. In our experimental results, the precision and recall aresimilar to recent open information extraction systems’ but our system can extract all information fromthe input sentence. Through the results, we assume that SRDF could be useful in QA task for a relatively
long question.
4.2SenTGM in OKBQA platform

Open Knowledge Base and Question Answering (OKBQA) is a community and a hackathon to makeadvanced technology for developing a question answering system. The virtue of OKBQA is open collaboration that harmonize resources developed by different groups scattered over the world. We made
SenTGM for the first step of OKBQA called Template Generation using our SRDF system. SenTGM
takes a Korean natural language question and produces a pseudo query defined in Templator (Unger et al.,2012) and it is now working for the Korean natural language question in OKBQA framework properly.
The architecture and example of SenTGM is shown in Figure 6.

5Conclusion

In this paper, we proposed a new open information extraction system called SRDF. Our approach is anovel method of combining Open IE with the singleton property technique for the full text extraction.
Furthermore SRDF represents extracted knowledge as reified triple form for usability in many existing
semantic web applications. And also we demonstrated that our approach can be used in the OKBQA
framework for question answering. In the future, we will research a question answering approach overSRDF knowledge graph using the synonym such as Wordnet and word embedding to resolve the ambiguity.
80Figure 6: Architecture and Example of SenTGM

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by Institute for Information & communications Technology Promotion(IITP) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIP) (No. R0101-16-0054, WiseKB: Big data
based self-evolving knowledge base and reasoning platform). This work was supported by theBio & Medical Technology Development Program of the NRF funded by the Korean government,MSIP(2015M3A9A7029735)

References
Alan Akbik and Alexander Löser. 2012. Kraken: N-ary facts in open information extraction. In Proceedings ofthe Joint Workshop on Automatic Knowledge Base Construction and Web-scale Knowledge Extraction, AKBCWEKEX ’12, pages 52–56, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Luciano Del Corro and Rainer Gemulla. 2013. Clausie: Clause-based open information extraction. In Proceedingsof the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’13, pages 355–366, New York, NY, USA.
ACM.
Mausam, Michael Schmitz, Robert Bart, Stephen Soderland, and Oren Etzioni. 2012. Open language learningfor information extraction. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in NaturalLanguage Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, EMNLP-CoNLL ’12, pages 523–534,
Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Vinh Nguyen, Olivier Bodenreider, and Amit Sheth. 2014. Don’t like rdf reification?: making statements aboutstatements using singleton property. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web,pages 759–770. ACM.
Christina Unger, Lorenz Bühmann, Jens Lehmann, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Daniel Gerber, and PhilippCimiano. 2012. Template-based question answering over rdf data. In Proceedings of the 21st international
conference on World Wide Web, pages 639–648. ACM.

81