Mr. Giri Suprapdiono
Director of Gratification
Corruption Eradication Commission
Indonesia

Short Biography
Giri Suprapdiono, Director of Gratification of KPK, has an ample
experiences in global and domestic anti-corruption movement
since the establishment of KPK in 2005. Appointed as the
youngest Director in 2012, he has responsibility to strengthen
integrity in both government and private sector throughdeveloping gratification control program, law enforcement andimproving anti-corruption system. In 2015, he was running andshortlisted as KPK Commissioners candidates.
He was member of steering group Anti-Corruption &Transparency Initiative (ADB-OECD), initiator of APEC ACT-NET,delegation of APEC ACTWG, Chief of Secretariat Committee ofSouth East Asia Parties Against Corruption (SEA-PAC),
Delegation in COSP-UN Convention Against Corruption, memberof International Association of Anti-Corruption Authorities(IAACA), Chair of Session in developing Jakarta Principle on AntiCorruption Agency, delegation ACTWG of G20. Speakers ininternational and national events such as: OECD, ILEA, GOPAC,
C,,
IACF, private and public sector conferences/seminars, etc.

－ 43 －

“ARTS” IN COMBATING CORRUPTION

Giri Suprapdiono, Director of Gratification KPKKPK Indonesia:

Experience, Achievements and Challenges
in combating Corruption for a Decade－ 44 －

3URQJHG
ವ'HWHUUHQFH $OO&DVHV
ವ3UHYHQWLRQವ(GXFDWLRQ

 3URQJHG

ವ(QIRUFHPHQW %LJ)LVK /($
ವ3UHYHQWLRQ LQFO(GXFDWLRQ
ವ3XEOLF3DUWLFLSDWLRQThe KPK's Duties(Article 6 Law No.30 year 2002)

Coordination
Coordinatio
atio
tio
on
n
(Articlee 7)
7

Monitorin
Monitoring
orin
ng
n
g
(Articlee 14
4)Supervision
Supervisio
p isiosio
onn(Articlee 8)
8Duties of
KPK(Article 6)

Preventio
Prevention
ntio
on
o
n
(Articlee 13
3)－ 45 －

Prrre
Pre
e-in
investigation,nnvestig
gation,g
Investigation
Inv
ves ga ovesvestvestigatioon &Prosecution
Prosecuti
oseccut
cutition
ionn(Articlee 111)

Some features:• Independent from the Executive, Legislative, Judiciary and any other powers• Responsible to the Public• Financially, KPK is audited by the Indonesian Supreme Audit Board (BPK)• Established in Dec 29th, 2003
• Supervise & Coordinate Attorney General Office & National Police inhandling Corruption cases
Other features:• 5 Commissioners• 3 (4) Advisors• 1518 officers (less than 300 investigator and prosecutor)

2EMHFWLYHV• Change the public attitude• Enlist the public support• Encourage public report• Promote the deterrent effect• Promote a clean society• Promote the corporate image ofanti-corruption agency－ 46 －

CORRUPTION PERCEPTION INDEX

RANK

SCORE

90/176 37/100－ 47 －

Corruption Perception Index
Steady Increased Trend
5

5,1

5,2

5,1
4,5

3,6

3,3

2,4 2,3

3,5

3,4

4,4

5

4,9

3,8

3,7

3,6

3,5

4,3

3,5

3,4

3

2,6 2,8 2,8

3,7

3,5

3,8

3,2 3,2 3,4Indonesia
Thailand
Malaysia

RANK

SCORE

90/176 37/100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Corruption Perception Index

6WHDG\,QFUHDVHG7UHQG

Philippines

ThailandIndonesia

Malaysia

87

86

84

85

84

49

50

52

50

49

32

32

34

36

37

37

35

38

38

35

34

36

38

35

35

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

－ 48 －

SingaporeThere are various anti-corruption bodies formed to combat
corruption. Before the KPK, all these anti-corruption bodies havefailed to address corruption at all possible levels
The main reason for failure is corruption that has permeated national
systems –Corrupt acts have become
more sophisticated and systemic and categorized as extraordinary
crime
ERADICATE CORRUPTION must be done by
extraordinary means
Law No. 30 Year 2002 on
Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)C
UNCAC ratified & G20 commitments
Strengthening anti-corruption bodies, Ensure the effectiveness, andsafeguarding its independence from undue influence

ENFORCEMENT－ 49 －

13

Judges, incl.
Chief OF JC
Prosecutors

Echelon I (DG)
Echelon II (Director)

25 100%

Minister Level
Min

Member of
Parliament

Ambasadors

Commissioners
missionerssConviction RateConve

Governor & Deputy
Gov. of Central Bank

Others incl.
Investigator,& Auditors

Mayors andHead of Regent
Pr
Provincial
GovernorGo

Private Sector

670

TOTAL

Procurement
Permit Source: acch.kpk.go.id
Statistic, 30th June 2017

Corruption
by type of
cases



Bribery
 0LVDSSURSULDWLRQRIEXGJHW－ 50 －

2TKXCVG'EJGNQP+/GODGTQH
5GEVQTU
+++++
2CTNKCOGPV



4GIGPVU
*GCFQH)QXGTPQTU/C[QTU+PUVKVWVKQPU,WFIGU%QOOKUKQPGTU#ODCUUCFQTU

1VJGTUConviction Rate

－ 51 －

Corruption
by type of
position

Minister of Energy....

7 Years
His Secretary General....

8 Years

Bitter Smile....
In the area of Extractive Industry

7 Years

12 Years
MP....

His Chief Oil & Gas Oversight Body....

KPK’s Detention Center－ 52 －

Achievements
Red Handed－ 53 －

78

Red

Handed－ 54 －

Assets Recovered
IDR 1.917.509.443.183
oe(USD 147,5 Million)

Rutan KPK

Kebebasan yang hilang...

－ 55 －

Corruption CJSPreInvestigation

Investigation

Prosecution

Court

Correctional

Criminal Justice System
KPK/CEC
Law 30/2002

POLICELaw 2/2002

AGO
Law 16/2004

Pre
Investigation

Investigation

Pre
Investigation

Investigation

Pre
Investigation

Investigation

Prosecution

Pre Trial

6SHFLDO$QWL&RUUXSWLRQ&RXUW )LUVW$SSHDO
6XSUHPH

Prosecution

The KPK is authorized to conduct pre-investigations, investigations, andprosecutions against corruption cases that:• Involving law enforcement and state officials, and other individuals
connected to corrupt acts perpetrated by law enforcement or state officials;• Have generated significant public concern; and/or• Have state lost at least IDR 1,000,000,000 (more than US$ 110,000).

－ 56 －3ULVRQ

Court System
Supreme
Court

Religious
Court / Islamic
Court

Govt.
Administrative
Court

Military Court

General Court

Tax Court

Criminal Court

Private Court

Corruption
Court

PRE-INVESTIGATION• Based on Public Complaint
analysis result and Proactive
Investigation• To obtain at least sufficient
preliminary evidence: 2 items ofevidences (including electronic
evidence)• KPK has authority to do lawfull
interception without any court
permission• Intelligent operation (mostly
required) conducted in this stage－ 57 －

INVESTIGATION/INDICTMENT• Could not stop investigations in
the mid-way• Seizure can be performed without
any Court Order• Suspect is obliged to provide
information of his/her assets,
along with those of his/her family
trees and organization/corporation• Coordinate/supervise other LEA
for corruption• Involving Prosecutor since earlyprocess of investigation

PROSECUTION• 14 days after a investigation file isreceived by prosecutor, it has to bedelivered to the Court• Prosecute in the Special Court ofCorruption,• Reversing evidentiary burden to
defendant for his/her asset• Court decisions (verdict) must be
made within maximum 90 days
• Possibility for appeals in high court
and supreme court• Ad hoc Judge (3 out of 5 are lay judge
or non career judge)• Court Recording for monitoring trial
process－ 58 －

ICACವ RIILFHUVವ !LQYHVWLJDWRUVವ SUHYHQWLRQವ FRPPXQLW\UHODWLRQವ )DFLOLW\GHWHQWLRQDGYDQFHGLQWHUYLHZURRPKHOLSDGVKRRWLQJUDQJHJXQV－ 59 －

Anti Corruption History...

－ 60 －LESSONS LEARNT

Anti Corruption Agencis in Asia
•CPIB Singapore – Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau –1952•MACC Malaysia – Anti Corruption Agency –1967•ICAC Hong Kong–1974•ACB Brunei – Anti Corruption Bureau –1982•ICAC-CCC-CMC Australia - 1989
•NAB Pakistan – National Accountability Bureau –1999•NACC Thailand – National Anti Corruption Commission–1999•CCAC Macau – Commission Against Corruption –1999•ACRC/KICAC South Korea –2008/2002•CVC India – 2003
•KPK Indonesia – Corruption Eradication Commission –2003•ACC Bangladesh – Anti Corruption Commission –2004•IAAC Mongolia – Independent Authority Against Corruption–2006•NCPB China - National Corruption Prevention Bureau -2007•ACU Cambodia – 2010 (2006)•ACC/CAC Timor Leste – 2010, dst－ 61 －

CORRUPTORSS …FIGHT BACK !

－ 62 －

The extent of KPK’s reach thus far:a glimpse at KPK cases that rocked the boat

source: The Jakarta Post Newspaper, November 2, 2009,
p. 4

Heavy Test on KPK in 2009
The Chairman had to be terminatedfrom position
because of suspect of murder allegation

Bibit
bit-Chandra
a CaseAntasariri CaseWeakening of KPK
Dirty Designed Caseof 2 Commissioners－ 63 －

| Two Commissioners of KPK,
declared as a suspect by Police
in September 2009 and both
gentlemen were then detained
amidst growing public concerns,
especially about the lack ofevidence and shaky witness
testimonies. “…theirarrests were part of aplot to frame them andweaken the KPK.
| Constitutional Court held ahearing on Monday, Nov 2 2009
where the KPK provided morethan four hours of wiretapped
conversations between caseintermediary and the law
enforcement officers mafia
involved where many details

CIVIL SOCIETY & COMMUNITY
as a pressure group| NGOs consortium established CICAK(GECKO) movements all over the country(KPK supporters named themselves as‘Gecko’ againts CROCCODILE (refers to
Police Mafia/Corruptors). The groupstrongly support KPK during the heat.

| Protests support KPK happened almost
daily, including making ground camping
in front of KPK office in order to protect
KPK from Corruptors attack.
| CICAK phenomenon has been supported
on the online social website Facebook,with more than a 1,250,000 supporters for
KPK only within a week:

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/group.php?gid=169178211590&ref=ts| CICAK featured prominently in one The
Economist article “The Gecko Bites Back”:

http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?
story_id=14816720－ 64 －

CORRUPTORS FIGHT BACK: THE
PEOPLE’S VOICE| A Facebook petition is getting close to 1,500,000 followers
in only less than two weeks| Various largest people movement supporting KPK acrosscities, nationwide

PEOPLE MOVEMENTS IN SUPPORTING KPKEVERYDAY….ACROSS CITIES…NATION WIDEPEOPLE SUPPORT DURING KPK CRISIS－ 65 －

They said: “Safeguarding Reforms is a Full Time Job!”

Anti-corruption Camping
ground In KPK office by
students activists(Safeguarding KPK)

Various Civil society
and students
movements acrosscities during
International Anti
Corruption day is thelargest in many
years…

Safeguarding Reforms is a Full Time Job!

－ 66 －

Movement in Defending & Guarding of KPK from undue influenceand intervention‘WIN OF THE BATTLE’“The allegation against KPK commissioners was acquitted, its clearly showed that there wasfabricating cases for dirty purposes managed by the corruptors mafia to weaken KPK”

Judicial Court trial ‘LIVE’ Broadcasted by Media on Nov 2, 2009

－ 67 －

7KH\FRUUXSWHYHU\WKLQJKHUH
:HĜOOVHH:KR
ZLQWKLVEDWWOH
<RX
KDYH
QRSRZHUDJDLQVWPH
1DWLRQDO3ROLFHVWUXFNEDFNDJDLQVW
WKH.3.E\QDPLQJWZR.3.FRPPLVVLRQHUV&KDQGUD+DP]DKDQG%LELW6DPDG5LDQWRDVJUDIWVXVSHFWV(YHQPRUHGUDPDWLFDOO\DUUHVWHG.3.&KL
HI$QWDVDUL$]KDUIRUPXUGHU
7KH.3.FRPPLVVLRQHUVZHUHFOHDUHGDQG'XDGML ZDVIRXQGJXLOW\&LYLOVRFLHW\UHVFXHGWKH.3.ZLWKDQRXWSRXULQJRIVXSSRUWIRUFLQJ3UHVLGHQW6
XVLOR%DPEDQJ<XGKR\RQRWRXQ
GHUWDNHDQLQGHSHQGHQWLQYHVWLJDWLRQ.3.QDPHG&RPPDQGHU*HQHUDO
6XVQR'MXDGMLWKHKHDGRIWKH
1DWLRQDO3ROLFHĜV&ULPLQDO
,QYHVWLJDWLRQV'LUHFWRUDWHDVDJ
UDIWVXVSHFW

Crocodile VS Grecko Volume 1－ 68 －

1EVQDGT'R]HQVRISROLFHRIILFHUVWULHGWRHQWHU
WKH.3.KHDGTXDUWHUVWRDUUHVW.3.LQY
HVWLJDWRU 1RYHO%DVZHGDQ IRUDOO
HJHGO\VKRRWLQJUREEHU\VXVSHFWVLQ



'MRNR6XVLORZDVHYHQWXDOO\IRXQGJXLOW\DQGDUUHVWHG$JDLQWKRXJKWKH.3.SUHYDLOHGWKDQNVW
RLWVSRSXODUDQGSROLWLFDOVXSSRUW7KH,QYHVWLJDWLRQLQWR%DVZHGDQZDVVXVSHQGH
GIROORZLQJLQVWUXFWLRQIURP3UHVLGHQW<X
GKR\RQR,WPG

Crocodile VS Grecko Volume 2.3.QDPHGWKH1DWLRQDO3ROLFH7
UDIILF&RUSV&KLHI,QVSHFWRU*HQHUDO'MRNR6XVLOR DVDJUDIWV
XVSHFWIRUKLVLQYROYHPHQWLQDFRUUXSWGULYLQJVLPXODWRUSU
RFXUHPHQWSURMHFW(GD
3UHVLGHQW-RNRZLDVVLJQHG,QGHSHQG
HQW7LPWRJLYHKLPLQVLJKW%XGL*XQDZDQUHTXHVWHGDSUHWULDODQGDSSURYHGE\WKHFRXUW$FWLQJ'LUHFWRURI,QYHVWLJDWLRQ7KUHDWHQHGD
QG7HUURUL]HG1RYHO%DVZHGDQDUUHVWHGIRUDO
OHJHGO\VKRRWLQJUREEHU\VXVSHFWVLQ

7KHSROLFHDUUHVWHGRQH.3.GHSXW\%DPEDQJ:LMRGMDQWRIRUKLVDOOHJHGUROHLQ
JHWWLQJZLWQHVVHVWRJLYHIDOVHWHVW
LPRQ\LQDHOHFWLRQGLVSXWHFDVH7KH
SROLFHWDUJHWHGDQRWKHU.3.GHSXW\ $GQD
Q3DQGX3UDMDIRUDOOHJHGO\RZQLQJLOOHJDOVKDUHVLQDFRPSDQ\7KHSROLFHWKHQEH
JDQDVPHDUFDPSDLJQDJDLQVW.3.FKLH
I$EUDKDP6DPDGFLUFXODWLQJIDNHSKRWRVRI6DPDGNLVVLQJ0LVV,QGR
QHVLDDQGDFFXVLQJKLPRIKDYLQJ ĚXQHWKLFDOPHHWLQJĚ ZLWKSROLWLFLDQVI
URPWKHUXOLQJSDUW\,CP

Crocodile VS Grecko Volume 3－ 69 －

3UHVLGHQW-RNR:LGRGRĜVVROHFDQGLGDWH
IRU,QGRQHVLDĜV1DWLRQDO3ROLFH&KLHI&RPPDQGHU*HQHUDO%XGL*XQDZDQZD
VQDPHGDVDJUDIWVXVSHFWE\WKH.3.
IRUDOOHJHGLQYROYHPHQWLQDPXOWLPLOOLRQGROODUEULEHU\VFKHPHKPK investigator suffers burns in acid attack－ 70 －

Partnership• Government departments• Business community• Professional bodies• Civil society organizations• Educational institutions• Mass media• Public• International networking

3 Main Pillars
in preventing
corruption)QXGTPOGPV)QXGTPOGP
5GEVQTU

2TKXCVG
5GEVQTU

2WDNKE
5GEVQTU－ 71 －

Effective Prevention
in Eradicating Corruption
3UHVHQWHGE\*LUL6XSUDSGLRQR'LUHFWRURI*UDWLILFDWLRQ&(& 5,

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

%XUHDXFUDWLF5HIRUP +5DQG6DODU\$GMXVPHQWQW(QKDQFHSXEOLFVHUYLFHGHOLYHU\
Holistic(*RYHUQPHQWHSURFXUHPHQW
Aproachment
2SHQ*RYHUQDQFH 7UDQVSDUHQF\:KLVWOHEORZHUV\VWHP'HFODUDWLRQRIDVVHWVDQGFRQIOLFWRILQWHUHVW'HFODUDWLRQRI*UDWLILFDWLRQ LOOHJDOJLIW
3ROLF\DQG6\VWHP5HYLHZ,QWHJUDWHG/DZ(QIRUFHPHQWDQG3UHYHQWLRQ6WUDWHJ\(GXFDWLRQ&DPSDLJQDGQ&ROODERUDWLRQ
5HSOLFDWLRQRI%HVW3UDFWLFHV－ 72 －

Ethical Dillemas Develop
Ethical if underright circumstances

Unethical－ 73 －

Tone from The TOP－ 74 －

－ 75 －

－ 76 －

－ 77 －Gift Confiscate from Self Reporting USD 8,7 Million
Within 8 months

UDR 113.7 Billion

Gratification in Health Sector－ 78 －

Campaign & Public Education
Programs

Public Campaign
p g & Socialization
 Antinttiti-CorruptionpGimmics Multimedia Materials
 Organizinggg Events
 Public Campaign
p g events
 Mobile & Outreach Campaignp TV and Radio Campaign
 Artist of Integrity

Anti CorruptionpEducation
Developing module for Elementary school,
Junior High School,University, journalist, private
sector, public official, parliament, etc
Train the Trainers for the University Student
Conducting Seminars and Workshop

The

New Social－ 79 －EnginesNEW WAVE SUB CULTURE:

Youth, Women, and Netizen as New Social Engines－ 80 －

－ 81 －

E-Learning Gratifikasi
www.kpk.go.id/gratifikasi

Remote Outreach Services Vehicle－ 82 －

YOUTH EDUCATION

Youth Campaign

Artist of Integrity－ 83 －Powerful messages..
from the Artist－ 84 －

－ 85 －SENI Mengantarkan Nurani...

Women & Artist in Fighting Corruption－ 86 －

Get the Message out…

Remote Outreach
Services Vehicle
For campaign－ 87 －

Key Success Factors
Lessons learnt & Challenges

KPK Key Success Factors
Involvement of investigator and prosecutor since in the
beginning of pre-investigation► Dedicated Asset Tracing Unit in LEA► Immediate action handled by Rapid Movement Unit
► The strength and support of International Cooperation Team► Comprehensive technology support for intelligent andinvestigation operation (interception, forensic, database andtactical technology)► Certainty of time frame in the process of indictment,
prosecution and court process by law► Could not stop any investigation in the mid way► Put an extra efforts to gather evidence more than the required
threshold evidence► Admissible electronic evidence support during court
proceeding►－ 88 －

The KPKK’ Internal Success Factors (1)K’s(1• Independency;• Complete Law Enforcement authority (pre-investigation,
investigation, prosecution) against criminal acts ofcorruption;• Authority to tap and record conversations (lawfulinterception) without court permission• No need for clearance from any authority before initiating
a case against high profile public officials;• Authority to request data on the wealth, tax details,
financial data from banks/other financial institutions of asuspect or defendant from the relevant institutions

The KPK’s Internal Success Factors (2)• Order relevant institutions to block accounts of a suspect,defendant, or connected parties• Temporarily halt financial transactions, trade transactions,and other forms of contracts, or to temporarily annul
permits, licenses and concessions if there is indication ofconnection to corruption cases• Order relevant institutions to ban an individual(s) fromtravelling abroad• Request assistance from Interpol Indonesia or LEA of othernations• Comprehensive Information Technology support.

－ 89 －

The KPKK’ Internal Success Factors (HR)K’s
• Independent and open recruitment system• Performance measurement and evaluation• Career Path
• Better remuneration compared to other government
agencies• Allowance based on performance• Internal whistle blowing system among employees• Better compliance of ethical/code of conduct

Determinants of Success• Strong political support from the country leadership.
• Implementation of a comprehensive and clear legal
framework for anti-corruption work (adequate law);• Effective mechanisms for inter-agency coordination;• Adequacy resources (financial, infrastructure andhuman resources);• Effective and continuous communication & relation
with media, NGOs and citizens－ 90 －

Major Challenges
Judiciary and Police Corruption► Inconsistency in supporting of the anti-corruption
movement (political will) –willing to take part in corrupt
mechanisms so long as they benefit from them;► Low integrity of law enforcement and public officials► Corruptors fight back;► Internal oversight system is weak
► Government administrative system prone to corrupt► Low remuneration system and Lack of human resourcesmanagement of public officials►

Major Challenges (2)Low integrity : has allowed offers and solicitation ofbribes to continue;z Deligitimation of KPK: Investigating commisioners andkeypersons without prudent evidences to destroy
KPK’s reputations;z Corruption in Politics: Over Democratic System(Election Processes)z Dynamic Modus Operandi: i.e. White collar crimes
make use of legitimate financial and contractual
instruments to move stolen assets off-shore;z Poor performance of internal oversight bodies
z High Public Expectationz－ 91 －

WHY ACA FAIL?
1. Lack of political will
2. Lack of resources
3. Lack of independence
4. Wrong strategy
5. Inadequate law
6. Inadequate jurisdiction – private sector, election
7. Lack of public credibility & support
8. Lack of coalition
9. Corrupt judiciary
10. Lack of professional staff
11. Lack of internal control
Tony Kwok, 2008

Key Success Factors• Effective Enforcement-Prevention-Education• Start off with effective enforcement• Professional & high integrity staff• Adequate law• Adequate resources• Partnership & Cooperation• Equal emphasis – public & private sector• Public support• Independence• Top political will
Quote: Tony Kwok, 2008

－ 92 －

We areFilling the
GAP

Mouse

－ 93 －

I thank You

TERIMA KASIH

Q&A－ 94 －

CASE STUDIES:
forestry case

Condition of Kalimantan－ 95 －

2000

2003

2006

Rapid Changes Deforestation Record－ 96 －

Deforestation

Deforestation Proses－ 97 －

Case Background :• Provide unlawful recommendation for Palm
Oil Plantation, ( 1 Million Ha)• Temporary Right Approval in Forest
Plantation Business (temporary HPHTP) andTimber Utilization License (IPK) provided byGovernor. (should receive Permit of Release
Forest Area from Minister of Forestry.
• Provide Principal Approval for Land Clearing
and Timber Utilization, provide dispensationfor Bank Guarantee Submission Obligationof PSDH-DR IPK to companies of Surya
Dumai Group in 2008 as well.

KALIMANTAN CASE

Government
PolicyConspiration
Companies –Gov. App.

Unlawful
Recommendati
on andapproval

Dispensationof Bank
Guarantee

Logging

State Loss

－ 98 －KALIMANTAN CASE
Breaking of :a) Forestry and Plantation Technical Rules in Government Regulation No.
6/1999 on Forestry Business and Forestry Product Collection in Forest of
Production;b) Decree of Minister of Forestry and Plantation No: 538/Kpts-II/1999, 12 July
1999 on Timber Utilization License;c) Decree of Minister of Forestry and Plantation No : 107/Kpts-II/1999, 3 March
1999 on Plantation Business License;d) Joint Decree of Minister of Forestry, Minister of Agriculture, and Head of
National Land Affairs Office No: 364/Kpts-II/1999, 519/Kpts/HK. 050/7/90
23-VIII-1990, 23 July 1990 on Rules of Forest Area Disposal and Lease Rights
for Agriculture Business Development;e) Decree of Minister of Forestry and Plantation No: 376/Kpts-II/1998, 8 April
1998 on Criteria of Forest Procurement for Palm Oil Plantation Cultivation;f) Encyclic of Directorate General of Forest Production No: 1709/VI-PHH/1999,
27 July 1999 on Bank Guarantee Submission Obligation for Reforestation
Funds and Forest Resources Provision for the Holder of Timber Utilization
License.

LESSONS LEARNTPolitical commitment►Independent ACA►Public, NGO and Media support,incl. International support►Integrity and Profesionalism of
Personel►IT support►－ 99 －KALIMANTAN CASE
• Infringement of Article 2 section (1) Jo. Article 18 Corruption
Eradication Criminal Act Jo. Article 55 section (1) Number-1 Jo.
Article 64 section (1) Criminal Act.
• Infringement of Article 3 Jo. Article 18 Law of Corruption
Eradication Criminal Act Jo. Article 55 section (1) Number-1 Jo.
Article 64 section (1) Criminal Act.
• Total State Lost are Rp346.823.970.564,24• Court Verdict:Governor 4 year Imprisonment and Rp250.000.000 Fined.
Company Director 18 months Imprisonment and Rp.346,8 B
Fined.
Head Office of The Forestry Departement and Head of The
Regional Office Ministry of Forestry each 4 Years Imprisonment
and Rp. 200.000.000,- fined
Asset Recovered Rp346.8 B (USD 42 Million)

ASSET RECOVEREDYear
State Funds Lodged to
the Treasury(in IDR 000,000)

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6,959 12,991

48,455

411,800

144,282

134,360+
2,540,000

Total USD 46 million in 2008
Total USD 16 million in 2009

Total USD 297 million in 2010

－ 100 －

SUMATERARIAU CASE (SUMATERA)
Background Case:The unlawful issue of timber utilization
license of forest plantation for several
companies which have already breakTechnical Rules in Decree of Ministry ofForestry No. 10.1/Kpts-II/2000, 6 November
2000 on Guidance of IUPHHKHT Issue andDecree of Ministry of Forestry No. 21/KptsII/2001, 31 January 2001 on Criteria andStandard for Production Forest.

－ 101 －

SUMATERA CASE
Planting

Government
PolicyEstablishedCompanies

Obtaining
License ofForest Timber
Utilization

8 Companies

Logging

Take Over
7 Companies

State Loss

SUMATERA CASE
• Infringement of Article 2 section (1) Jo. Article 18
Corruption Eradication Criminal Act Jo. Article 55
section (1) Number-1 Jo. Article 64 section (1)Criminal Act.
• Infringement of Article 3 Jo. Article 18 Law ofCorruption Eradication Criminal Act Jo. Article 55
section (1) Number-1 Jo. Article 64 section (1)Criminal Act.
• Total State Lost are Rp 1.208.625.819.554,22(USD 131 Million)• Court Verdict:11 Years Imprisonment and Rp 500.000.000,Fined and additional sentence to pay
compensation for Rp 12.367.780.000,-－ 102 －

－ 103 －－ 104 －－ 105 －Other Bribery Case on land andforestry
IBR (Jakarta High Administrative Court
judge)receive a bribe from DLS(Enterpreneur on Palm Oil) and ADS(Lawyer of DLS) with the aim of
persuading the Judge on winning aland dispute against the Jakarta City
Administration.

Judge @River－ 106 －

Thank You
Email:
giri.suprapdiono@kpk.go.id－ 107 －

－ 108 －