June 2022

Port State Control Annual Report[English]-- Introduction of ClassNK software for PSC measures --PrimeShip-PSC Intelligence
Support for improvement of PSC performance and ship management systems$
PC ver.

New

0

Mobile ver.

In addition to the PC version of PSC Intelligence developed for ship management companies, PrimeShip-PSC
Intelligence now has a mobile version available developed for seafarers*. The mobile version has five functions
as followings.

*) Also available to management companies.

PSC Report
Minimize input effort
Allows you to digitize PSC reports including handwritten reports
utilizing AI-OCR technology. After the data conversion is completed,
it will be sent to the management company’s staff in chat format
and the PSC report data will be transferred to the PC version.

ReportEasily report and reliably manage tasks
After digitizing the PSC report and completing the checklist (coming soon*)on the app, it will be reported to the management company by tapping thesend button. In addition, it is possible to easily report a device malfunction
with a message using the camera. Since it also has a task management
function, seafarers can communicate closely with the managementcompany’s staff in chat format and make sure to rectify the defects.

Checklist (Coming soon*)
Handle reports even in an offline environment
This function allows users to call up and implement pinpoint PSC
checklists based on the actual deficiencies recorded by the PSC ineach country and port. Also, arbitrary checklists and reports
created by the user on the PC version can be handled even in an
offline environment.

Monthly information (Coming soon*)
Top 10 AI-based ranking
This function shows the top 10 typical deficiencies with theirtransition chart and actual deficiencies and photographs for the
past month in each country or port set by the user.

NK Picks (Coming soon*)
Timely PSC-related information
This function provides timely PSC-related information, including
IMO international convention and local regulations etc. informedby our technical information, that users should be aware of.

*Coming soon: This information is current as of the end of May 2022.

Contact address: Ship Management Systems Dept. NIPPON KAIJI KYOKAI Administration Center
Email: psc-intelligence@classnk.or.jp, TEL:+81-3-5226-2173

Photographs of Deficiencies
SOLAS (Fire Safety)

Cylinder hose disconnected(Fixed CO2 extinguisher system)

Inappropriate temporary repair& leakage from fire line

Fault alarm on
smoke detection alarm panel

SOLAS (Fire Safety)

Hold-back hook attached to afire door that is required to be
self-closing

Missing non-combustible
compounds

Wasted / damaged fire
door gasket

SOLAS (Life Saving Appliances)

Damaged life buoy

Corrosion holes onaccommodation ladder

Damage to equipment
inside the lifeboat

SOLAS (Safety Navigation)

Air bubble in the magnetic
compass

Missing wiper for the bridge
window

SOLAS (Safety Construction)

Cracks on hatch coaming& its bracket

Load Line

Broken float discof the air pipe head

Deformed / cracked stanchion for
guard rails & chains disengaged

Corrosion hole on theventilation hatch coaming

Machinery Space

Leakage from pipeline

Dirty condition with oil

Excessive oily bilge on
the E/R bottom

MARPOL

Drain plug missing

Leakage from the on board
hydraulic system

OthersUnusable toilet

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

Foreword
This Annual Report on Port State Control (PSC) summarizes deficiencies identified during PSC
inspections carried out in various countries around the world. This report is prepared with the objective ofbuilding awareness of the present state of PSC and thereby improving future onboard maintenance andinspections as well as Safety Management Systems.
The report consists of the following chapters.
Chapter 1: Status of Implementation and Recent Developments in PSC Worldwide
Chapter 2: Statistical Analysis of Detained Ships Registered with ClassNK
Chapter 3: Statistical Analysis of NK SMC Ships Detained by PSC (ISM Code)
Chapter 4: Statistical Analysis of NK MLC Ships Detained by PSC (MLC, 2006)
Chapter 5: Statistical Data from Tokyo MOU, Paris MoU and USCGPort State Control has been recognized as a very direct and effective means to reduce the number ofsubstandard ships as well as to improve the safety of ships at sea and to prevent marine pollution. The
activity of PSC worldwide has significantly been strengthened along with the increasing number of
amendments to the relevant international Conventions.
Further to the above, in order to carry out the effective implementation of port state responsibilities, many
countries have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for regional cooperation among local
PSCs, and have agreed to establish a centralized & digitized database system and/or a harmonizedapproach.
The scope of PSC inspection has been extended from the hardware aspect of the ship to the software
aspect such as onboard maintenance or operational procedures ever since the ISM Code was adopted andapplied to all ships and it is still expanding as more new concepts of regulations have been introduced by
the adoption of NOx Tier III regulation, 2021 global cap of sulphur content in fuel oils, Ship Recycling
Convention (the Hong Kong Convention), IMO DCS (EU MRV), etc.
In line with the above progress of PSC, ClassNK has been working hard and will work harder to increase
the transparency of information related to PSC and to eliminate substandard vessels.

June 2022

Note: Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented in this report. However, as
information is collected from a variety of sources, ClassNK cannot be held responsible for any erroneous data,
judgements or conclusions that may appear in this report, in cases where the information available should prove tohave been incomplete or incorrect in any respect.

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1
Status of Implementation and Recent Developments in PSC Worldwide ····················1
1.1 Amendments to the relevant conventions ······························································· 1
1.1.1 EU Regulation on Ship Recycling ·································································· 1
1.1.2 2020 global cap of sulphur content in fuel oils ···················································· 1
1.1.3 Fitting or designation fuel oil sampling points ···················································· 1
1.1.4 Maintenance for lifeboats etc. ······································································· 2
1.1.5 Electronic record books ·············································································· 2
1.1.6 Application of Cyber Risk Management ··························································· 2
1.1.7 Sampling analysis commissioning tests for ballast water management systems ·············· 3
1.1.8 Short-term measures for reduction of CHG ························································ 3
1.2 Recent global developments ·············································································· 4
1.2.1 MOUs around the world·············································································· 4(1) European and North Atlantic region (Paris MoU) ············································· 4(2) Asia-Pacific region (Tokyo MOU) ······························································ 5(3) Latin-American region (Latin American Agreement) ········································ 5(4) Caribbean region (Caribbean MOU) ···························································· 5(5) Mediterranean region (Mediterranean MoU) ··················································· 6(6) Indian Ocean region (Indian Ocean MOU) ····················································· 6(7) Black Sea region (Black Sea MOU) ····························································· 6(8) West and Central Africa region (Abuja MoU)·················································· 6(9) Arab States of the Gulf (Riyadh MoU)·························································· 6
1.2.2 Port State Control in the United States (USCG) ··················································· 7
1.3 Measures adopted by ClassNK ··········································································· 8
1.3.1 Handling of the Deficiencies Identified by PSC Inspections ···································· 8(1) Cooperative assistance with PSC and treatment of the deficiencies ························· 8(2) Treatment of inspection reports by PSC officers ··············································· 8
1.3.2 Minimizing the number of detained ships in order to reduce substandard ships ·············· 8(1) Special training at several in-house meetings ·················································· 8(2) Meetings and informal gatherings with management companies ···························· 8
1.3.3 Visits to PSC authorities ·············································································10Chapter 2
Statistical Analysis of Detained Ships Registered with ClassNK····························· 11
2.1 General ····································································································· 11
2.2 Data on Detentions ························································································ 11
2.2.1 Detentions per Flag State ············································································ 11
2.2.2 Detentions per Ship Type············································································13
2.2.3 Detentions per Ship’s Age ···········································································14
2.2.4 Detentions per Ship Size (Gross Tonnage) ························································15
2.2.5 Detentions per PSC Country ········································································16
2.2.6 Detentions per MOUs and USCG ··································································17
2.3 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies ····································································18
2.3.1
Detainable Deficiencies per Category····························································18
2.3.2Frequently Reported Deficiencies ································································19

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.4 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies per PSC Country ···············································25
2.4.10 Australia ··························································································25
2.4.20 Russia ································································································26
2.4.30 Indonesia ·····························································································26
2.4.40 China ·································································································27
2.4.50 Italy ·································································································27
2.4.60 Belgium ······························································································28
2.4.70 United States ························································································28
2.4.80 Canada ·······························································································29
2.4.90 Saudi Arabia Canada ···············································································29
2.4.10 United Kingdom ····················································································29
2.4.11 Germany ·····························································································30
2.4.12 Japan ·································································································30

Chapter 3
Statistical Analysis of NK SMC Ships Detained by PSC (ISM Code) ······················ 31
3.1 General ····································································································31
3.2 Statistics of Detentions of NK SMC Ships ·····························································31
3.3 Analysis of ISM Detainable Deficiencies ······························································33
3.3.1 Australia ·······························································································34
3.3.2 Belgium ·······························································································35
3.3.3 USA ····································································································36

Chapter 4
Statistical Analysis of NK MLC Ships Detained by PSC (MLC, 2006) ····················· 37
4.1 General ·····································································································37
4.2 Statistics of Detentions of NK MLC Ships ·····························································37
4.3 Study of MLC Detainable Deficiencies ································································38

Chapter 5
Statistical Data from Tokyo MOU, Paris MoU and USCG ··································· 41
5.1 Tokyo MOU································································································42
5.1.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities ·················································42
5.1.2 Port State Inspections carried out remotely ·······················································43
5.1.3 Black List of Flag States ············································································43
5.1.4 Recognized Organization Performance ····························································44
5.1.5 Deficiencies per Category ···········································································44
5.2 Paris MoU ··································································································45
5.2.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities ·················································45
5.2.2 Black List of Flag States ············································································46
5.2.3 Recognized Organization Performance ····························································46
5.3 USCG ·······································································································47
5.3.1 USCG Statistics ······················································································47
5.3.2 Targeted Flag States (Safety) ·······································································47
5.3.3 Recognized Organization Performance (Safety) ·················································48

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

Chapter 1
Status of Implementation and Recent Developments
in PSC Worldwide
1.1 Amendments to the relevant conventions
Major amendments to international conventions and to the relevant regulations that came into effectfrom 2020 through 2022 are summarized below.
1.1.1 EU Regulation on Ship Recycling
Entry into force: 30 December 2013
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-1170, -1185, -1224, -1225, -1255]
Development of inventory of hazardous materials (IHM) is required for EU flagged ships and nonEU flagged ships by the following date. In addition, ship owners have to ensure that EU flagged
ships are recycled only at the recycling facilities included in the EU List, which list ship recycling
facilities authorized in accordance with the Regulation.
[Deadline for developing and having an IHM onboard](1) EU flagged new ships: The date of delivery (building contract on/after 31 December 2018)(2) EU flagged existing ships: 31 December 2020 (If a ship is to be recycled before 31 December
2020, IHM shall be prepared prior to recycling)(3) Non-EU flagged ships: 31 December 2020
For EU flagged ships, two hazardous materials (PFOS and HBCDD) are added to the Hong Kong
Convention. Among them, PFOS is compulsory to EU flagged existing ships (EU flagged new ships
are prohibited to carry PFOS). Therefore, even if an IHM complying with the Hong Kong
Convention is provided onboard an EU flagged existing ship, the checking of PFOS is additionallyrequired to comply with the EU regulation.
（Information on Ship Recycling:https://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/en/activities/statutory/shiprecycle/index.html）
1.1.2 2020 global cap of sulphur content in fuel oils
Entry into force: 1 January 2020
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-1192]
In order to reduce emissions of Sulphur Oxides (SOx) and Particulate Matter (PM) from ships, thelimit of the sulphur content of any fuel oil used on board ships was tightened to 0.50% m/m outside
emission control areas (ECAs) from 1 January 2020. If equipment evaluated to be equivalent to therequired reduction level of SOx is not installed onboard, the loading of non-compliant fuel oil is
prohibited except in cases where compliant fuel oil is unavailable.
1.1.3 Fitting or designating fuel oil sampling points
Entry into force: 1 April 2022
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-1228, -1261]
Relating to above paragraphs 1.1.2, fuel oil sampling points are required to be fitted or designatedfor the purpose of taking representative samples of the fuel oil being used on board the ship by the1ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

following date.
[Application date](1) At the time of the registration survey during construction for ships with a keel laid or which are ata similar stage of construction on or after 1 April 2022.
(2) At the time of the first IAPP renewal survey carried out on or after 1 April 2023 for ships with akeel laid or which are at a similar stage of construction before 1 April 2022. However, for Japaneseflagged ships delivered on or after 1 April 2022, at the time of the registration survey during
construction.
1.1.4 Maintenance for lifeboats etc.
Entry into force: 1 January 2020
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-1183]
On or after 1 January 2020, thorough examinations, operational tests, overhaul and repair of the
lifeboat etc. are to be conducted by certified personnel of either the manufacturer or an authorized
service provider in accordance with IMO Resolution MSC.402(96). In addition, personnel for thework are to be certified for each manufacturer and type of equipment to be worked on.
1.1.5 Electronic record books
Entry into force: 1 October 2020
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-1192]
MARPOL Convention requires that ships are provided with several record books for the purpose ofpollution prevention management. On and after 1 October 2020, approval of the electronic record
books is needed for these record books in accordance with Guidelines for the use of electronic
record books under MARPOL if the electronic record books are used in spite of paper ones.
1.1.6 Application of Cyber Risk Management
Entry into force: 27 October 2020
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-1217]
The USCG expects all companies with U.S. flagged vessels and foreign flagged vessels that call at ports
in the U.S. to ensure that cyber risk management is appropriately addressed in their SMS.
If objective evidence indicating that the foreign flagged vessel that calls at ports in the U.S. failed to
implement its SMS with respect to cyber risk management is identified, the following actions should bedirected by the PSCO:(1) If cyber risk management has not been incorporated into the vessel's SMS by the company's firstannual verification of the DOC after 1 January 2021, a deficiency should be issued with action code
30 - Ship Detained.
(2) When objective evidence indicates that the vessel failed to implement its SMS with respect to cyberrisk management, a deficiency for both an operation and an ISM should be issued with an action code
17 - Rectify Prior to Departure or an action code 30 – Ship Detained depending on its seriousness.

2ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

1.1.7 Sampling analysis at commissioning tests for ballast water management systems
Entry into force: 1 June 2022
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-1258]
The sampling analysis of individual BWMS should be conducted when BWM surveys, including
verification of BWMS installation, are completed on or after 1 June 2022. It should be noted that evenwhen the ship has a Statement of Fact on installation of BWMS, this requirement applies to those ships
for which the date of completion of a BWMS survey under Regulation D-2 is on or after 1 June 2022.
1.1.8 Short-term measures for reduction of CHG
Entry into force: 11 November 2022
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-1245, -1250][Efficiency Existing Ship Index(EEXI)]
Verification of EEXI for all ships of 400GT and above engaged in international voyages shall takeplace at the first annual, intermediate or renewal survey of the IAPP Certificate on or after 2023. If theattained EEXI value does not satisfy the required EEXI, the ship must implement measures to improveenergy efficiency and satisfy the required EEXI.
[Operational Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII)]
Each ship of 5,000GT and above engaged in international voyage should calculate attained CII every
year, based on the data of annual fuel consumption and annual distance travelled, which are collectedunder the Data Collection System for fuel oil consumption of ships (DOS). By the end of 2022, eachship should indicate on SEEMP, the calculation method of annual CII from the 2023 calendar year andreporting procedure of CII.
（Information on Ship Recycling:https://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/ja/activities/statutory/seemp/index.html）

New amendments to conventions are also introduced on the ClassNK Website in the section, ‘IMO
International Convention Calendar’.
(http://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/en/imo_conv_schedule/)3

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

1.2 Recent global developments
1.2.1 MOUs around the world
In order to carry out PSC effectively, a recommendation concerning regional co-operation in the controlof ships and discharges was adopted as a resolution by the IMO. In July 1982, fourteen European
countries signed the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MoU), and today
many countries have signed and accepted similar MOUs around the world. Currently, nine MOUs exist
around the world and their respective activities in terms of implementing PSC are described below.
European and North Atlantic region: Paris MoU(https://www.parismou.org/)

Asia-Pacific region: Tokyo MOU(http://www.tokyo-mou.org/)

Caribbean region: Caribbean MOU(https://www.caribbeanmou.org/)

Mediterranean region: Mediterranean MoU(http://www.medmou.org/)

Indian Ocean region: Indian Ocean MOU(https://www.iomou.org)

Black Sea region: Black Sea MOU(http://www.bsmou.org/)West and Central Africa region: Abuja MoU（http://www.abujamou.org/）

Arab States of the Gulf

: Riyadh MoU（https://www.riyadhmou.org/）

Latin American region: Latin American Agreement(http://www.acuerdolatino.int.ar/)(*)(*) This URL is not available now.

(1) European and North Atlantic region (Paris MoU)
Established: 1 July 1982
Members: Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands,
Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, the Russian Federation, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden,
and the United Kingdom-1. The Paris MoU consists of 27 participating maritime Administrations and covers the waters of
the European coastal States and the North Atlantic basin from North America to Europe. The
Paris MoU states that their aim is to eliminate the operation of sub-standard ships through aharmonized system of PSC.
-2. Press releases have announced the recent activities of the Paris MoU as follows.
Press release dated 23 July 2020
- Paris MoU announces the launch of a joint Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on
Stability (in general) with Tokyo MOU from 1st September, ending 30 November 2021
Press release dated 4 October 2021
- Paris MoU to start sharing its inspection date with the public in bulk form

4

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control(2) Asia-Pacific region (Tokyo MOU)
Established: 1 December 1993
Members: Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Fiji, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea,
Malaysia, Marshall Islands, New Zealand, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Peru,
Philippines, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Thailand, Vanuatu, Vietnam-1. The main objectives of the Memorandum have been announced as
1. to establish an effective Port State Control regime in the Asia-Pacific region through theco-operation of its members and the harmonization of their activities,
2. to eliminate substandard shipping so as to promote maritime safety,
3. to protect the marine environment, and
4. to safeguard working and living conditions onboard ships.
-2. Press releases announced the activities of the Tokyo MOU as follows:
Press releases dated 23 July 2021
- Tokyo MOU announces the launch of a joint Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on
Stability (in general) with Paris MOU from 1st September, ending 30 November 2021
Press release dated 27 October 2021
- Tokyo MOU held its 32nd meeting remotely via virtual means from 21 to 22 October
2021- Remote follow-up inspection procedure to be officially adopted and implemented from 1
January 2022; Guidelines for remote follow-up inspections also approved by theCommittee- Questionnaire and guidelines for the CIC with the Paris MOU on STCW approved inprinciple in 2022.
- Further discussion on preparations for joint CIC on Fire Safety in 2023 and Crew Wageand Seafarer Employment Agreement under MLC in 2024
Press release dated 16 February 2022
- Tokyo MOU announces preliminary results of the Concentrated Inspection Campaign(CIC) on Ship’s Stability in General, which was conducted from 1 September to 30
November 2021
- During the course of the campaign, the member Authorities of Tokyo MOU carried out
4,984 CIC inspections and 8 ships were detained for CIC related deficiencies.
(3) Latin-American region (Latin American Agreement)
Established: 5 November 1992
Members: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras,
Mexico, Panama, Peru, Republic of Dominica, Uruguay, and Venezuela(4) Caribbean region (Caribbean MOU)
Established: 9 February 1996
Members: Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, the Cayman
Islands, Cuba, Curacao, France, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, the Netherlands, St. Kitts
and Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Sint Maarten, Suriname, andTrinidad and Tobago
Associate member states：Anguilla, British Virgin islands- According to the 2020 Annual Report of the Caribbean MOU, a total of 489 inspections werecarried out (63% decrease year-on-year) and 7 vessels were detained in 2020.

5

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control(5) Mediterranean region (Mediterranean MoU)
Established: 11 July 1997
Members: Algeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Morocco, Tunisia, and Turkey- According to the 2020 Annual Report of the Mediterranean MOU, a total of 3,667 inspections
were carried out (32% decrease year -on-year) and 50 vessels were detained in 2020. The
average detention rate in 2020 was 1.36%.
(6) Indian Ocean region (Indian Ocean MOU)
Established: 5 June 1998
Members: Australia, Bangladesh, Comoros, Eritrea, France (La Reunion), India, Iran, Kenya,
Maldives, Mauritius, Madagascar, Mozambique, Myanmar, Seychelles, South Africa, Sri
Lanka, Sudan, Sultanate of Oman, Tanzania, and Yemen- According to the 2021 Annual Report of the Indian Ocean MOU, a total of 4,993 inspections
were carried out (5% increase year-on-year) and 198 vessels were detained in 2021. The
detention percentage in 2021 was 3.97%, a decrease from 4.58% recorded in 2020.
(7) Black Sea region (Black Sea MOU)
Established: 7 April 2000
Members: Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey, and Ukraine-1. According to the 2021 Annual Report of the Black Sea MOU, a total of 5,624 inspections
were carried out (1.70% decrease year-on-year) and 178 vessels were detained in 2021. The
detention percentage in 2021 was 3.17%, a decrease from 4.21% recorded in 2020.
-2. The Black Sea MOU announced the report of the Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on
Stability in General, which was conducted from 1 September to 30 November 2021.
(8) West and Central Africa region (Abuja MoU)
Established: 22 October 1999
Members: Angola, Benin, Cameroun, Cape Verde, Congo, Cote D’Ivoire, Democratic Republic ofCongo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Liberia,
Mauritania, Namibia, Nigeria, Sao Tome and Principe, Sierra Leone, Senegal, South
Africa, and Togo
(9) Arab States of the Gulf (Riyadh MoU)
Established: 30 June 2004
Members: Kingdom of Bahrain, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, State of Kuwait, State of Qatar, State ofUnited Arab Emirates, and Sultanate of Oman
- According to the 2020 Annual Report of the Abuja MoU, a total of 1,842 inspections werecarried out (42.55% decrease year-on-year) and 30 vessels were detained in 2020.

6

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

1.2.2 Port State Control in the United States (USCG)(1) Activity
Although the United States Coast Guard (USCG) is not a member of any MOU, it is an observer at anumber of MOUs, and undertakes effective PSC in cooperation with other MOUs. In the 1970's, theU.S. Coast Guard increased its emphasis on the examination of foreign vessels. Although thisemphasis was primarily driven by requirements to ensure compliance with the then new U.S.
pollution prevention and navigation safety regulations, boarding officers also exercised Port Stateauthority when instances of non-compliance with SOLAS and MARPOL were noted. In 1994, theU.S. introduced risk-management methodologies into the Port State Control program in order toallocate limited inspection resources to where they could do the most good, by identifying those
ships, ship owners, classification societies and Flag Administrations that were most often foundlacking in meeting their international Convention responsibilities. On 1 January 2001, the USCG
implemented an initiative to identify high-quality ships, called QUALSHIP 21, quality shipping forthe 21st century. This program has since proven to be very effective in recognizing well operated andmaintained ships of good quality and continues in use today. Further, on 1 July 2017, in addition to
QUALSHIP 21, the program of E-ZERO (Zero Environmental Deficiencies or Violations) began. EZERO designation has been assigned with exemplary vessels that have consistently adhered toenvironmental compliance.
(2) PSC Safety Targeting Matrix
The USCG uses the Port State Control Safety and Environmental Protection Compliance Targeting
Matrix which enables the Coast Guard to rationally and systematically determine the probable risk
posed by non-U.S. ships calling at U.S. ports. The matrix is used to decide which ships Port State
Control Officers should examine on any given day, in any given port. The numerical score, along withother performance-based factors, determines a ship's priority for examination.
(3) Banning of foreign vessels
All foreign flagged vessels operating in U.S. waters are required to be maintained in compliance with
U.S. regulations, international conventions and other required standards. However, when a vessel has
been repeatedly detained by the USCG (totaling three detentions within a twelve-month period) and it
is determined that failure to effectively implement the SMS onboard may be a contributing factor forthe substandard conditions that led to the detentions, the USCG Headquarters (USCG-HQ) will issue
a Letter of Denial prohibiting the ship from further entering any U.S. port until such time as certain
actions have been taken to rectify the situation. However, even if a vessel has less than threedetentions in twelve months, a Letter of Denial may be issued to any vessel which, in the option of
the USCG;
1. may pose a significant risk to the safety of the vessel, crew or the marine environment; or
2. has a history of accidents, pollution incidents, or serious repair problems which creates reason tobelieve that such a vessel may be unsafe or create a threat to the marine environment; or
3. has discharged oil or other hazardous material in violation of any law of the United States or in amanner or quantities inconsistent with the provisions of any treaty to which the United States is aparty.
(Reference: http://www.uscg.mil)

7

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

1.3 Measures adopted by ClassNK
1.3.1 Handling of the Deficiencies Identified by PSC Inspections(1) Cooperative assistance with PSC and treatment of deficiencies
When surveyors of the Society are notified of the detention of a ship classed with ClassNK, theSociety actively cooperates with the reporting PSC in a number of ways. The more direct of thesesteps include the following.
- Surveyors liaise with PSC to ensure that they are called in as soon as appropriate when deficiencies
related to class and/or statutory matters are identified.
- Surveyors liaise with PSC officers to ensure uniformity of interpretation of class and statutory
requirements.
- Surveyors provide PSC officers with background information, extracts from reports pertinent to theinspection, and details of outstanding recommendations of class and statutory items whenever sorequested by the PSC.
- Attending surveyors examine not only the condition of the deficiencies identified by the PSC
officers but also expand the scope of the survey for the general condition of the hull, machinery andequipment, or carry out the general examination to the extent of an annual survey if necessary,carefully considering the seriousness of any deficiencies when they attend ships that have been
subject to an intervention action by the PSC.
(2) Treatment of inspection reports by PSC officers
When a surveyor receives an inspection report from PSC, the report is sent to the ClassNK Head
Office. The report is immediately examined by the experienced staff to identify the causes of the
deficiencies. This examination is carried out for all ships for which such reports are received, and theresults are circulated to all sections concerned, as necessary. The results are also reflected in a
ClassNK PSC database that has been developed for the purpose of providing surveyors with PSC
related information electronically. The results of this examination are also submitted to the Flag State
Administration of the ship, as required. Further, visits may also be made to the management company
or others, when deemed appropriate, to advise them of the relevant deficiencies noted and toencourage them to more proactively improve the routine maintenance of their ships and take othermeasures as necessary to ensure the highest levels of safe and environmentally friendly operation.
In cases where the deficiencies pointed out by the PSC are determined to be related to previous
surveys conducted by surveyors of the Society, those surveys are treated as a non-conforming service,
and appropriate corrective and preventive actions are taken in accordance with the ClassNK quality
system.
1.3.2 Minimizing the number of detained ships in order to reduce substandard ships(1) Special training at several in-house meetingsSpecial training on PSC related issues is conducted at several meetings held regularly for generalmanagers and managers, to ensure that surveyors carry out full and effective surveys with anuncompromising attitude towards ensuring the quality and safety of the ships classed with theSociety.
Special re-training is also carried out under the supervision of the Head Office and regional managers,
as needed, for those surveyors who have conducted any surveys determined to be a non-conforming
service under the quality system of the Society.
(2) Meetings and informal gatherings with management companies(a) Visiting Management Companies
When a ship classed with ClassNK is detained by PSC, if deemed necessary, a senior surveyor or
manager of the Society visits the company managing the ship to discuss what steps can be taken to
improve the routine maintenance of the ships in their fleet, so as to prevent both a recurrence of the
deficiencies noted and the occurrence of similar problems in the future.
8ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control(b) Meetings and seminars
PSC related issues are regularly discussed at informal gatherings and technical committee meetings
held with management companies. At such times, explanations are given and documents arepresented, with emphasis placed on the importance of proactively ensuring the proper maintenanceof ships and education of crew in order to prevent the detention of ships.
(c) Software / Mobile applications
ClassNK has provided web and mobile services in order to support an improvement of PSC
performance and ship management systems, which are “PrimeShip-PSC Intelligence” and“ARRIVAL CHECKLIST for PSC”.
i) PrimeShip-PSC Intelligence (http://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/en/activities/portal/pscintelligence.html)
This system provides users with various functions to help improve fleet PSC performance andship management systems. There is a PC version for management companies and a Mobile
version for seafarers.
[Main Functions of the PC version]- Easy visual checking of trends of typical deficiencies, deficiency items or deficiency categories
at each port or country on world-map with AI technologies- Output a pinpoint checklist based on the PSC's past records of selected ports or countries- Analysis on the trend of deficiencies recorded on managing ships on a real-time basis throughthe managing company’s input of PSC reports- Output a summary report for PSC performance of managing ships- Display requirements of the IMO international convention and local regulations applied on
managing ships in a calendar format- Provides timely PSC-related information that users should know as “NK Picks”.
[Main Functions of Mobile version]- Converts PSC reports to digital data by manual input and by camera images captured by AI
OCR.
- Chat capability on the PC version allows users to report the result of PSC inspection and/or
equipment malfunctions to shore staff and work with them to resolve problems.
- Access to PSC and other checklists even in an offline environment.(*)- Shows the top 10 typical deficiencies for the past month in each country or port set by theuser.(*)- Provides timely PSC-related information that users should know as “NK Picks”(*)(*) Coming Soon (as of end of May 2022)ii) ARRIVAL CHECKLIST for PSC(*) (http://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/en/info_service/psc/)
A preparatory checklist mobile app to help minimize the risk of PSC detentions and deficiencies.
[Main Functions]- The items frequently pointed out by PSCO can be checked in each area onboard- Check results can be input in the system along with notes and photos- Check results can be forwarded to companies easily- The statistics and tendency of detentions in major ports can be confirmed- Checklists and statistics are updated automatically as needed(*): This application will be integrated into the above “PrimeShip-PSC Intelligence” in the near future.

9ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control(d) Publications
The “ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control” and a checklist entitled “Good Maintenanceon board Ships”, which can be used by the ship’s crew for quick and easy inspection of a ship
before entering port, are distributed to all registered management companies or others in theClassNK fleet and also posted on the ClassNK website below.
(http://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/en/info_service/psc/)
Twenty-two issues of the “ClassNK PSC Bulletin” were released as of June 2021. This bulletin provides
timely information on particularly notable deficiencies pointed out during PSC inspections of NK
classed ships and will be continuously provided to management companies.
1.3.3 Visits to PSC authorities
Designated persons from the ClassNK Head Office as well as local survey offices are assigned to visit theheadquarters or offices of various PSC authorities with the aim of introducing ClassNK and exchanging
views on matters of mutual concern. However, considering the circumstances due to the COVID-19
pandemic, ClassNK refrained from visiting PSC authorities in 2021, following 2020.

10

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

Chapter 2
Statistical Analysis of Detained Ships Registered with ClassNK
2.1 General
The data in this chapter, on ships detained due to deficiencies identified during PSC inspections, isbased on the following sources:(1) Notifications from Port States issued in accordance with IMO Resolution A.1138(31) “Procedurefor Port State Control, and(2) Publications related to detained ships issued by the Tokyo MOU, the Paris MoU, and the USCG.
In 2021, 242 PSC detentions were reported for 234 ships classed by NK. This included cases ofdetention for reasons not related to class or to NK itself. The total number of NK-registered ships (500
GT or over) was 8,545 at the end of December 2021. Therefore, the detention ratio(Detentions/Registered number in 2021) of the NK fleet in 2020 was about 2.8%.
2.2 Data on Detentions
2.2.1 Detentions per Flag State
Table 2.2.1 Detentions per Flag State

Flag State

PanamaJapan
Marshall Islands
Liberia
Singapore
Hong Kong, China
Malaysia
BahamasMalta
Viet Num
CyprusThailandAntigua andBarbudaCayman Islands
TurkeyOthers
Total

Number ofRegistered Ships(500GT or over)2019 2020 2021
3,058 3,052 2,950
983
967
981
679
717
807
663
729
801
719
710
717
422
427
386
256
253
386
169
165
160
179
168
151
90
91
93
68
63
66
75
65
64

Number of
Detentions

Detention Ratio (%)

2019
211
4
28
42
11
12
1
7
13
7
5
5

2020
127
2
29
21
13
19
1
5
0
1
0
2

2021
112
2
28
29
8
15
0
2
7
5
1
2

2019
6.9
0.4
4.1
6.3
1.5
2.8
0.4
4.1
7.3
7.8
7.4
6.7

2020
4.2
0.2
4.0
2.9
1.8
4.4
0.4
3.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
3.1

2021
3.8
0.2
3.5
3.6
1.1
3.9
0.0
1.3
4.6
5.4
1.5
3.1

50

4

5

3

8.5

9.4

6.0

57
59
50
55
54
49
981
973
834
8,501 8,546 8,545

1
0
43
394

1
1
23
250

2
2
23
242

1.8
0.0
6.2
4.6

1.7
1.9
2.3
2.9

4.0
4.1
2.8
2.8

47

53

11

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

PanamaNo. of Detentions（2021）

No. of Registered Ships（2021）

Japan

50

Marshall Islands

50
64

49

Liberia
2

66
93
151
160

2

834

5

23

1
2

2,950

386

Singapore

2

3

Hong Kong,
China
Malaysia

7

0

112

15

386

8

Malta

717

Viet Nam

29
801

Bahamas981
Cyprus28

807

2ThailandAntigua andBarbudaCayman Islands
TurkeyOthersFig. 2.2.1-1 No. of Resisted Ships & Detentions per Flag State

9.4

2019

2020

2021
8.5
7.8
7.4

7.3
6.9

6.7
6.3
6.0
5.4
4.1
4.0
3.5

4.2
3.8

4.6

4.4

4.1

3.9

3.6
2.9
1.8
1.5
1.1

0.4 0.2
0.2

3.1
3.1

3.0

2.8

1.5

1.3
0.4
0.4
0.0

1.8
1.7

1.9

1.1
0.0

0.0

Fig. 2.2.1-2 Detention Ratio per Flag State (%)
12

4.1

4.0

0.0

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.2.2 Detentions per Ship Type
Table 2.2.2 Detentions per Ship TypeShip Type
Bulk Carrier
General Cargo
Container Carrier
Chip Carrier
Cement Carrier
Ro-Ro Ship
Vehicles Carrier
Reefer Carrier
Oil Tanker
Oil/Chemical Tanker
Gas Carrier
Others
Total

Number ofRegistered Ships(500GT or over)2019 2020 2021
3,826 3,946 3982
689
661
654
605
607
643
118
117
124
125
123
124
103
101
100
337
316
105
109
108
308
707
696
659
766
783
787
401
405
400
715
683
659
8,501 8,546 8545

Number of
Detentions
2019
239
65
30
3
1
5
11
6
7
21
3
3
394

2020
170
40
9
4
1
0
7
0
1
13
3
2
250

Detention Ratio (%)

2021
162
36
12
2
0
0
5
5
2
13
1
3
242

2019
6.2
9.4
5.0
2.5
0.8
4.9
3.3
5.5
1.0
2.7
0.7
0.4

2020
4.3
6.1
1.5
3.4
0.8
0.0
2.2
0.0
0.1
1.7
0.7
0.3

21 13 13

3 3 1

2021
4.1
5.5
1.9
1.6
0.0
0.0
1.6
4.8
0.3
1.7
0.3
0.5

239

2019

2020

2021

170
162
65

40 36

30

9 12

3 4 2

1 1 0

5 0 0

11 7 5

6 0 5

7 1 2

3 2 3

Fig. 2.2.2-1 No. of Detentions per Ship Type
9.4
6.2

2019
6.1

4.3 4.1

5.5

5.0

2020

2021
5.5

4.9
3.4
1.5 1.9

4.8

3.3

2.5

2.2

1.6

2.7
1.6

1.0

0.8 0.8
0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

1.7 1.7
0.1 0.3

Fig. 2.2.2-2 Detention Ratio per Ship Type (%)

13

0.7 0.7

0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.2.3 Detentions per Ship’s Age
Table 2.2.3 Detentions per Ship’s Age
Number ofRegistered Ships(500GT or over)

Ship’s Age
Up to 5 years old
Over 5 and up to 10
Over 10 and up to 15
Over 15 and up to 20
Over 20 and up to 25
Over 25
Total

2019
2,271
2,515
1,794
870
716
335
8,501

2021
2,034
2,367
2,127
1,009
653
355
8,545

2019
24
95
103
66
76
30
394

2020
18
65
79
42
33
13
250

Detention Ratio (%)
2019
1.1
3.8
5.7
7.6
10.6
9.0

2021
10
51
76
42
36
26
242

2020
0.8
2.6
3.9
4.8
4.8
3.8

2021
0.5
2.2
3.6
4.2
5.5
7.3

103

95

2019

2020
2,157
2,476
2,004
877
693
339
8,546

Number of
Detentions

79

2018
2021

76

76
66

65
51

42

42
33

24

18

36

30

26
13

10

Up to 5

Over 5

Over 10

Over 15Over 20

Over 25

and up to 10

and up to 15

and up to 20

and up to 25

Fig. 2.2.3-1 No. of Detentions per Ship’s Age
13.1

2019
2020

10.0

10.6

2021

9.0
7.6
6.3

3.7

3.8

7.3

6.1

5.7

5.5
4.2

3.6
2.2

1.2

1.1

Up to 50.5Over 5

Over 10

Over 15Over 20and up to 10

and up to 15

and up to 20

and up to 25

Fig. 2.2.3-2 Detention Ratio per Ship’s Age (%)

14

Over 25

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.2.4 Detentions per Ship Size (Gross Tonnage)
Table 2.2.4 Detentions per Ship Size (Gross Tonnage)
Number of Registered
Ships
Number of Detentions Detention Ratio (%)
Gross Ton (x 1,000)(500GT or over)2019 2020 2021 2019 2020 2021 2019 2020 2021
Up to 10
2,637 2,556
44
94
53
44
3.6
2.1
1.8
Over 10 and up to 20 1,283 1,263
54
95
50
54
7.4
4.0
4.3
Over 20 and up to 30 1,131 1,150
61
68
42
61
6.0
3.7
5.2
Over 30 and up to 40 1,358 1,412
39
77
49
39
5.7
3.5
2.7
Over 40 and up to 50
822
884
19
23
26
19
2.8
2.9
2.0
Over 50 and up to 60
298
297
10
5
9
10
1.7
3.0
3.4
Over 60 and up to 80
200
199
1
3
0
1
1.5
0.0
0.5
Over 80
772
785
13
29
21
13
3.8
2.7
1.7
8,501 8,546
241
394
250
242
Total
94

95

2019

2020

2021

77
68
61
53

50

44

54

49
42

39
23

29

26

21

19
5

Up to 10

9 10

13
3

0

1

Over 10

Over 20

Over 30

Over 40

Over 50

Over 60

and up to 20

and up to 30

and up to 40

and up to 50

and up to 60

and up to 80

Over 80

Fig. 2.2.4-1 No. of Detentions per Ship Size (Gross Tonnage)

7.4

2019
6.0

2020

2021

5.7
5.2

4.0

3.6

4.3
3.7

3.5

2.1

3.0

2.8 2.9

2.7

2.0

1.8

3.8

3.4

1.7

2.7
1.7

1.5
0.5
0.0

Up to 10

Over 10

Over 20

Over 30

Over 40

Over 50

Over 60

and up to 20

and up to 30

and up to 40

and up to 50

and up to 60

and up to 80

Fig. 2.2.4-2 Detention Ratio per Ship Size (Gross Tonnage) (%)
15

Over 80

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.2.5 Detentions per PSC Country
Table 2.2.5 No. of Detentions per PSC Country
Country
2019 2020 2021
61
66
44
Australia
36
35
33
Russia31
17
22
Indonesia
120
9
18
China
7
3
12
Italy
6
11
9
Belgium(*)
16
98
United States
7
10
8
Canada5
6
8
Saudi Arabia
7
1
7
United Kingdom
2
6
7
Germany
12
10
6
Japan
6
11
6
Korea
8
4
5
Turkey304Poland3
1
3
Argentina
3
0
3
Spain
2
3
3
France013United Arab Emirates
332
Greece322
Ireland1
1
2
Bangladesh

Iran
Malta
UkraineOthers

1
1
4
46

1
0
18
22

2
2
1
22

250
394
Total
(*) Including Guam, Puerto Rico, and Pago Pago

242

2019

2020

2021
61

Australia

44

66

36
35
33

RussiaIndonesia

17

31
22
120

China

9

Italy

7

3

12
6

Belgium

9

United States

7
8
5
6

Saudi Arabia

Germany

16

8

7

2

6
7
12
10

6
6

Korea

11

6

Turkey

4
5
4
1

10

7

1

Japan

Ukuraine

11

98

CanadaUnited Kingdom

18

8

18

Fig. 2.2.5 No. of Detentions per PSC Country

16

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.2.6 Detentions per MOUs and USCG
Table 2.2.6 No. of Detentions per MOUs and USCG
Region
Tokyo
MOU
Paris
MoU

No. of Inspections(*)
2019
2020
2021

No. of Detentions
2019
2020
2021

Detentions Ratio
2019
2020
2021

12,506

6,489

6,943

265

142

111

2.12

2.19

1.60

2,318

1,709

2,114

56

44

67

2.42

2.63

3.13

USCG

2,456

1,875

2,660

18

10

7

0.73

0.53

0.26

Total

17,280

339

1.96

339

197

242

1.96

1.96

1.57

Tokyo MOU

Paris MOU

USCG

NK Total

17280

12506
11747

10073
6943

6489

2318

2456

2019

2660

2144

1875

1709

2020

2021

Fig. 2.2.6-1 No. of Inspections per MOUs and USCG

3.50

Tokyo MOU

Paris MOU

USCGTokyo MOU

Paris MOU

USCG
300

265

3.13

3.00
2.42

2.50

250

2.63

200

2.00

2.12

2.19

142

111

1.50
1.00

56

0.50

0.73

150
1.60
100

67
45

18

0.53

0.26

10

50

7

0.00

0
2019

2020

2021

Fig. 2.2.6-2 No. of Detentions and Detention ratio per MOUs and USCG

17

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.3 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies
2.3.1 Detainable Deficiencies per Category
In 2021 a total of 821 detainable deficiencies were reported relating to 242 detentions, i.e., deficiencies
which were serious enough to jeopardise the ship’s seaworthiness, safety of the crew onboard, or topresent a threat of harm to the environment and therefore warranted the detention of the ship. The
deficiencies are categorized as shown in Figure 2.3.1 and categories in this figure are based on those of
the Tokyo MOU. Deficiencies related to Fire safety and Safety Navigation combined accounted forabout 30% of the total. When the deficiencies related to Emergency Systems and Life-saving appliances
are added to the above total, they account for about half of the total number of deficiencies in 2021.
2019

2020

2021

Fire safety

ISM

45

158

71
83

Emergency Systems

64
72Life saving appliances

66
70

Water/Weathertight conditions

128

128

51

24

45

34
27
41

Propulsion and auxiliary machinery

23

Certificate & Documentation - Crew Certificates

33
31

15
13

28

Certificate & Documentation - Ship Certificates

20
22
27

Structural Conditions

28
16
23

Labour Conditions - Health protection,
medical care, social security

13
20
21

Pollution prevention - MARPOL Annex IV

20
21

Pollution prevention - MARPOL Annex I

25
20

Labour Conditions - Minimum requirements for seafarers

16
24
18

Radio Communications

154

94
96

Safety of Navigation

Labour Conditions - Accommodation,
recreational facilities,food and catering

240

112

9

42

51

18
15

Fig. 2.3.1 No. of Detainable Deficiencies per Category

18

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.3.2 Detainable Deficiencies per Defective item
Figure 2.3.2 shows those items of detainable deficiencies that were reported frequently, in conjunction withthe actual detention of ships in the NK fleet. ISM, Lifeboat, and Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting
divisions continue to be the major items where most detainable deficiencies were found. The items reported
from 2019 to 2021 are explained in detail in paragraphs (1) to (15) below. (Regarding details of deficiencies
related to ISM and MLC, refer to Chapter 3 and Chapter 4.)
2019

2020

2021

ISM
Lifeboats

21

Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions

Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes
Fire detection and alarm system

16

21
40

17
38

9

17

Fire pumps and its pipes

23

12

17

Other (ISM)

25
26

16

Electronic charts (ECDIS)

5

Ventilators, air pipes, casings

6
16
22

6

Propulsion main engine

15
8

Auxiliary engine

10
15
14

6

14

Emergency source of power - Emergency Generator

23

13
5
5

Evaluation of Crew Performance (fire drill)

27

19

18
15

22

18

8

Fire-dampers

13
17

3

11
5
5

Lights, shapes, sound-signals
Voyage or passage plan

33
20

18

Maintenance of the ship and equipment

45
23

23
16

Seafarer' employment agreement (SEA)

4
4

11

11

Fig. 2.3.2 No. of Detainable Deficiencies per detective item
19

43

20

10

Sewage treatment plant

Fire drills

42

31

32

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control(1) Fire Safety
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Fire Safety” are shown in Table
2.3.2-(1) below.
Item
Fire doors/openings in fireresisting divisions
Fire detection and alarmsystemFire pumps and its pipes

Table 2.3.2-(1) Fire Safety
2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Fire doors don’t close properly (by self20 10 23 closing device), fitting of hold-back system,
Wasted/missing gasket
Malfunction of fire detector, covered
19 16 18 detection sensor with plastic bag, control
panel displaying abnormal reading
Malfunction of fire pump (incl. for emergency)
23 12 17
wasted/holed/leaking fire main line

Fire-dampers

40

15

17

Evaluation of Crew
Performance (fire drill)

5

5

13

Fixed fire extinguishinginstallation

29

10

9

Wasted/inoperable fire-dampers
Not familiar with
operation/procedure/assigned duty
Wasted/corroded/holed piping line,
disconnected hoses for CO2 system(2) ISM related deficiencies
For details of deficiencies, refer to Chapter 3.

(3) Safety of Navigation
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Safety of Navigation” are shown in
Table 2.3.2-(3) below.
Table 2.3.2-(3) Safety of Navigation
Item2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Electronic charts (ECDIS)

6

5

16

Lights, shapes, soundsignals

5

5

11

Voyage or passage plan

4

4

11

Voyage data recorder(VDR / S-VDR)

10

5

8

Nautical publications

10

7

8

Charts

16

8

6

20

ENC not updated
Navigation lights damaged (glass cracked,
cover wasted, etc.)
Local conditions/information not available
onboard, not confirmed with ECDIS, chart
missing
Malfunction
Nautical publications (Sailing Directions,
Notice to Mariners, etc.) for intended voyage
not updated/not available
Not updated
Navigation charts for engaged/intended
voyage not available

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control(4) Emergency Systems
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Emergency Systems” are shown in
Table 2.3.2-(4) below.
Table 2.3.2-(4) Emergency Systems
Item2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Emergency fire pump and its
Inoperable
27 22 18
pipes
Insufficient discharge pressure
Emergency generator unable to start with
Emergency source of power second mean of starting, emergency
32 23 13emergency generator
generator unable to automatically connect
to emergency switchboard
Not familiar with
Fire drills
17 13 11operation/procedure/assigned duty
Week/abnormal batteries
Emergency lighting, batteries
20
7
9 Inoperative/wasted/damaged emergency
and switches
lightsNot familiar with
Abandon ship drills
20
7
7
operation/procedure/assigned duty
Malfunction of water ingress alarm system
Water level indicator
121
6
in cargo holds(5) Life Saving Appliances
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Life Saving Appliances” are shownin Table 2.3.2-(5) below.
Table 2.3.2-(5) Life Saving Appliances
Item2019 2020 2021

Lifeboats

45

21

23

Rescue boats

16

10

9

Launching arrangements forrescue boats

8

4

6

Operational readiness oflifesaving appliances

8

7

5

Embarkation arrangements
for survival craft

12

1

4

Immersion suits

1

4

3

21

Noted Deficiencies
Lifeboat engine not started
Poor maintenance of rechargeable batteries
Inoperable on-load release gears
Rescue boat engine not started
Poor maintenance of rechargeable batteries
Inoperable on-load release gear, poor
maintenance, not familiar with operation
On-load release systems not reset
Inadequate pressure of hydraulicaccumulator
Poor condition of embarkation ladder,embarkation lights broken/burned out
Unsuitable size, poor condition

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control(6) Water/Weathertight conditions
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Water/Weathertight conditions” areshown in Table 2.3.2-(6) below.
Table 2.3.2-(6) Water/Weathertight conditions
Item
2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Corroded/seized flaps/covers of ventilators
6 15
Ventilators, air pipes, casings 22
and float of air pipe heads
Hatch covers wasted/corroded/holed
Hatch covers
15
8 14 Cleats wasted/missing
Cargo and other hatchways
Rubber packing missing/wasted
Doors

6

2

9

Corroded/wasted, Not properly closed(7) Propulsion and auxiliary machinery
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Propulsion and auxiliarymachinery” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(7) below.
Table 2.3.2-(7) Propulsion and auxiliary machinery
Item2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Oil/cooling water leakage
10
8 15
Propulsion main engine
Instruments inoperative
Auxiliary engine

14

14

6 Inoperable auxiliary engines, oil leakage

Bilge pumping arrangements

1

3

4

Instruments inoperable
Suction valve seized/secured(8) Crew Certificate
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Crew Certificate” are shown in
Table 2.3.2-(8) below.
Table 2.3.2-(8) Crew Certificates
Item2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Contract expired, unsuitable contract,
Seafarers’ employment
8 21 18 continuously employed on board for longagreement (SEA)
periodManning specified by the
Number and qualification not in accordance
1
1
3
minimum safe manning doc
with the safe manning document

22

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control(9) Labour Conditions-Accommodation, recreational facilities, food and catering
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Labour ConditionsAccommodation, recreational facilities, food and catering” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(9) below.
Table 2.3.2-(9) Labour Conditions-Accommodation, recreational facilities, food and catering
Item2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Sanitary facilities

5

1

6

Shower/toilet unavailable/damaged/dirty

Cold room, cold roomcleanliness, cold room
temperature

1

1

5

Dirty, inappropriate temperature control,
floor/instruments covered by float

Provisions quantity

1

2

4

Quantity/variety not sufficient for intended
voyage, quantity of fresh food not sufficient(10) Ship Certificates
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Ship Certificates” are shown in the
Table 2.3.2-(10) below.
Table 2.3.2-(10) Ship Certificates
Item2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Cargo Ship Safety
Expired, conditional/short term certificate
Equipment (including
1
2
6
not presented onboard
Exemption)
Cargo ship safety
construction (including
3
2
3 Expiredexemption)(11) Structural Conditions
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Structural Conditions” are shown in
Table 2.3.2-(11) below.
Table 2.3.2-(11) Structural Conditions
Item
Ballast, fuel and other tanks
Electrical installations
in general
Hull damage impairing
seaworthiness
Steering gear2018 2019 2020

Noted Deficiencies

5

2

4

Emergency shut off valves of oil tanks
inoperative

2

3

3

Batteries not secured

1

4

3

Hull structure dented/holed

8

9

2

Malfunction

23ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control(12) Labour Conditions - Health protection, medical care, social security
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Labour Conditions - Healthprotection, medical care, social security” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(12) below.
Table 2.3.2-(12) Labour Conditions - Health protection, medical care, social security
Item2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Winches and capstans

1

1

3

Wasted/corroded

Cleanliness of engine room

5

3

3

Oil stain

Access/ structural features(ship)

1

1

3

Accommodation ladders/gangway/verticalladder wasted/corroded(13) MARPOL Annex IV
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “MARPOL Annex IV” are shown in
Table 2.3.2-(13) below.
Table 2.3.2-(13) MARPOL Annex IV
Item2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Sewage treatment plant

33

16

20

Inoperative (including blower)(14) MARPOL Annex I
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “MARPOL Annex I” are shown in
Table 2.3.2-(14) below.
Table 2.3.2-(14) MARPOL Annex I
Item2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Oil content meter / 15PPM alarm inoperable
15 PPM alarm
21 24
6Ship’s crew not familiar with operation
Oil filtering equipment /Oil discharge Monitoring and2
4
5 Oil water separator malfunction
control system(15) Labour Conditions －Minimum requirements for seafarers
Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Labour Conditions －Minimum
requirements for seafarers” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(15) below.
Table 2.3.2-(15) Minimum requirements for seafarers
Item2019 2020 2021
Noted Deficiencies
Unpaid wages (including for overtime
Wages
13
11 10 work), not as per collective bargain
agreement
Other (conditions of0
6
5 Employed onboard for long period
employment)24ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.4 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies per PSC Country
Most frequent detainable deficiencies per PSC country are shown in Tables 2.4.1 to 2.4.12 according to
number of detentions reported from 2018 to 2020. (Regarding details of deficiencies related to ISM and
MLC, refer to Chapter 3 and Chapter 4.)
2.4.1 Australia
Table 2.4.1 Australia
Category of Detainable Deficiency(*)

ISM
Life saving appliances
Emergency systems
Fire safety
Water/weathertight conditions
Labour conditions - minimum requirements for
seafarers

2019 2020 2021
20
24
16
15
20
13
17
13
6
12
11
6
4
9
4
4

4

3

Defective Items

2019 2020 2021
8
14
6
Other (ISM)
6
83Lifeboats4
3
4
Shipboard operations
3
5
4
Maintenance of the ship and equipment
554Operational readiness of lifesaving appliances
5
5
4Emergency fire pump and its pipes
114
3Fire-dampers
1
3
3
Ventilators, air pipes, casings
1
6
2
Fire pumps and its pipes
11
8
2
Emergency source of power - emergency generator
3
4
2
Rescue boats(*) In Australia, a deficiency relating to Safety of Navigation is not directly judged as adetainable deficiency but as an ISM detainable deficiency since it is regarded as
ISM related.
A total of 62 detainable deficiencies relating to 44 detentions were noted in 2021.
(1.4 detainable deficiencies/detentions)25

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.4.2 Russia
Table 2.4.2 Russia
Category of Detainable Deficiency
Safety of navigation
Emergency systems
Fire safety
Water/Weathertight conditions
Life saving appliances
Propulsion and auxiliary machinery
ISM

2019 2020 2021
23
19
29
17
17
17
25
13
12
5
2
8
15
7
8
1
6
7
20
8
7

Defective Items
2019 2020 20213
38Electronic charts (ECDIS)
03
7Lights, shapes, sound-signals
6
5
6
Emergency lighting, batteries and switches
4
7
6
Other (ISM)
57
4Emergency fire pump and its pipes
233Lifeboats
8
4
3Fire detection and alarm system
443
Nautical publications
A total of 110 detainable deficiencies relating to 33 detentions were noted in 2021.
(3.3 detainable deficiencies/detentions)2.4.3 Indonesia
Table 2.4.3 Indonesia
Category of Detainable Deficiency
Fire safety
Pollution prevention - MARPOL Annex IV
ISM
Pollution prevention - MARPOL Annex V
Structural Conditions
Emergency systems
Life saving appliances

2019 2020 2021
16
7
11
12
8
9
6
8
5
4
2
4
0
0
3
10
7
2
8
5
2

Defective Items
2019 2020 2021
Sewage treatment plant
1069Fire detection and alarm system
014Fire-dampers
1124
Garbage management plan0
1
4
A total of 47 detainable deficiencies relating to 22 detentions were noted in 2021.
(2.1 detainable deficiencies/detentions)26

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.4.4 China
Table 2.4.4 China
Category of Detainable Deficiency
Safety of navigation
ISM
Propulsion and auxiliary machinery
Certificate & Documentation - Ship Certificates
Certificate & Documentation Documents
Fire safety
Emergency systems

2019 2020 2021
14
2
8
37
14
4
8
0
4
5
1
3
1
0
2
90
3
2
40
2
2

Defective Items
2019 2020 2021
Propulsion main engine
2
0
4Lights, shapes, sound-signals
3
0
2
Voyage data recorder (VDR)/Simplified Voyage
402date recorder (S-VDR)
Bridge operation20
2
Hull damage impairing seaworthiness
102Fire detection and alarm system
302
15 PPM Alarm arrangements
202
Records of rest
002
A total of 23 detainable deficiencies relating to 18 detentions were noted in 2021.
(1.3 detainable deficiencies/detentions)2.4.5 Italy
Table 2.4.5 Italy
Category of Detainable Deficiency
2019 2020 2021
Fire safety
12
420
Safety of navigation
3
2
13
ISM
6
3
8
Certificate & Documentation - Crew Certificates
1
37Life saving appliances01
6Emergency Systems
10
5
5
Certificate & Documentation - Ship Certificates6
6
4
Labour Conditions – Accommodation, recreational
5
1
4facilities, food and catering
Defective Items
2019 2020 2021
ISM
6
3
8
Evaluation of Crew Performance (fire drill)0
0
4
Seafarer employment agreement (SEA)1
03
Bridge operation003Fire fighting equipment and appliances
1203Atmosphere testing instruments
0
1
3
A total of 86 detainable deficiencies relating to 12 detentions were noted in 2021.
(7.2 detainable deficiencies/detentions)27

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.4.6 Belgium
Table 2.4.6 Belgium
Category of Detainable Deficiency
Fire safety
ISM
Certificate & documentation - crew certificates
Safety of navigation
Emergency systems
Certificate & Documentation Documents
Life saving appliances
Pollution prevention - Ballast Water

2019 2020 2021
9
22
10
5
8
8
5
10
6
2
7
6
3
3
4
1
0
3
8
2
3
0
0
3

Defective Items
2019 2020 2021
ISM
5
8
8
Seafarer employment agreement (SEA)596Fire detection and alarm system
142Fire drills
002Electronic charts (ECDIS)002
A total of 55 detainable deficiencies relating to 12 detentions were noted in 2021.
(5.0 detainable deficiencies/detentions)2.4.7 United States
Table 2.4.7 United States(*)
Category of Detainable Deficiency
Fire safety
ISM
Structural conditions

2019 2020 2021
12
17
11
21
7
7
3
2
2

Defective Items
ISM
Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions
Oil accumulation in engine room
Immersion suits

2019 2020 2021
21
7
7
0
0
3
3
11
2
1
0
2

(*)： Including Guam，Puerto Rico

A total of 26 detainable deficiencies relating to 8 detentions were noted in 2021.
(3.3 detainable deficiencies/detentions)28

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.4.8 Canada
Table 2.4.8 Canada
Category of Detainable Deficiency
2019 2020 2021
Labour Conditions - Minimum requirements for009seafarers
Certificate & documentation - crew certificates026Structural Conditions
00
3Fire safety
3
1
3
ISM
2
3
3
2019 2020 2021
Wages
0
0
7
Seafarer employment agreement (SEA)
0
2
5
ISM
2
2
3
Legal documentation on work and rest hours
00
2
A total of 16 detainable deficiencies relating to 8 detentions were noted in 2021.
(2.0 detainable deficiencies/detentions)Defective Items

2.4.9

Saudi Arabia
Table 2.4.9 Saudi Arabia
Category of Detainable Deficiency
Fire safety
Emergency Systems
Pollution prevention - MARPOL Annex I2019 2020 2021
1
0
4
1
0
3
0
2
3

Defective Items
2019 2020 2021
Fire pumps and its pipes
102Water level indicator
002
Oil Water Separator and associated apparatus
003(Including 15PPM alarm)
A total of 16 detainable deficiencies relating to 8 detentions were noted in 2021.
(2.0 detainable deficiencies/detentions)2.4.10 United Kingdom
Table 2.4.10 United Kingdom
Category of Detainable Deficiency
2019 2020 2021
Fire safety
3
0
7
ISM
6
1
5
Emergency Systems
2
02
Defective Items
2019 2020 2021
Evaluation of crew performance (fire drill)
0
0
5
ISM
6
1
5
A total of 18 detainable deficiencies relating to 7 detentions were noted in 2021.
(2.6 detainable deficiencies/detentions)29

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

2.4.11 Germany
Table 2.4.11 Germany
Category of Detainable Deficiency
Fire safety
Labour conditions - accommodation, recreational
facilities, food and catering
Water/weathertight conditions
Life saving appliances
Emergency Systems
Pollution prevention - MARPOL Annex IV
ISM
Labour conditions - health protection, medicalcare, social security

2019 2020 2021
6
8
30
2

5

16

1
0
0
0
2

4
4
0
4
3

11
10
8
5
5

2

5

3

Defective Items
2019 2020 2021
10
7Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions
Sewage treatment plant
0
3
5
ISM
2
3
5
Sanitary facilities
01
4
Cold room, cold room cleanliness, cold room1
1
4
temperature
Fire pumps and its pipes003Remote means of control (opening, pumps,
1
0
3
ventilation, etc.) machinery spaces
Fire-dampers
1
1
3
Means of escape003Evaluation of crew performance (fire drill)
0
1
3
Doors
1
1
3
Emergency fire pump and its pipes013Lifeboats0
1
3
A total of 97 detainable deficiencies relating to 7 detentions were noted in 2021.
(13.9 detainable deficiencies/detentions)2.4.12 Japan
Table 2.4.8 Japan
Category of Detainable Deficiency
2019 2020 2021
Fire safety
5
2
4
Certificate & documentation - crew certificates
1
3
1
Labour conditions - minimum requirements for2
3
1
seafarers
Defective Items
2019 2020 2021
Fixed fire extinguishing installation
3
2
2
Fire-dampers
002
Seafarer employment agreement (SEA)0
2
1
Other (conditions of employment)
0
2
1
A total of 6 detainable deficiencies relating to 6 detentions were noted in 2021.
(1.0 detainable deficiencies/detentions)30

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

Chapter 3
Statistical Analysis of NK SMC Ships Detained by PSC (ISM Code)
3.1
GeneralThis chapter presents statistical analysis from the viewpoints of ISM Code, on the ships holding Safety
Management Certificate (hereafter, “SMC”) issued by the Society (hereafter, “NK SMC ships”) based on
PSC Inspection Reports NK has obtained.
Table 3.1 shows the registered number of the NK SMC ships. The NK class ships account for 91.0% of theNK SMC ships.
Table 3.1 Number of NK SMC Ships (per Class)
Classification
2019
2020
2021
NK class
5,116 90.0% 5,220 90.4% 5,188 91.0%
Other class
569
10.0%
554
9.6%
511
9.0%
Total
5,685
5,774
5,699
Note:

The number is one of ships engaged in international voyages including under 500 gross tonnage

3.2
Statistics of Detentions of NK SMC Ships
In 2021, the total number of the detentions of NK SMC ships was 175, which was 3.1% of all NK SMC
ships, or 5,669(hereafter, “Detention Ratio”).
Tables 3.2.1 and Table 3.2.2 show the number of detentions and the Detention Ratio per flag and ship type,respectively.
Table 3.2.1 Number of Detentions and Detention Ratio of NK SMC Ships per Flag
2019
2020
2021
Country
(I)
(II)
(III)
(I)
(II)
(III)
(I)
(II)
(III)
Bahamas
4
116
3.4%
5
114
4.4%
2
105
1.9%
Cyprus
5
61
8.2%
0
61
0.0%
1
60
1.7%
Hong Kong
13
382
3.4%
18
374
4.8%
15
355
4.2%
Japan
4
320
1.3%
2
309
0.6%
2
309
0.6%
Liberia
27
434
6.2%
15
471
3.2%
16
509
3.1%
Malta
8
151
5.3%
2
152
1.3%
7
137
5.1%
Marshall Islands
28
564
5.0%
22
595
3.7%
24
654
3.7%
Panama
135
2,548
5.3%
94
2,490
3.8%
85
2,430
3.5%
Singapore
8
590
1.4%
11
608
1.8%
7
641
1.1%
Thailand
3
75
4.0%
1
68
1.5%
2
61
3.3%
Other Flag
18
444
4.1%
11
532
2.1%
14
438
3.2%
Total
253
5,685
4.5%
181
5,774
3.1%
175
5,699
3.1%
Note:

( I ): No. of Detentions, ( II ): No. of NK SMC Ships, ( III ): Detention Ratio = ( I ) / ( II ) %31

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

Table 3.2.2 Number of Detentions and Detention Ratioof NK SMC Ships per Ship Type (SOLAS IX)
2019
2020
Type of Ship
(I)
(II)
(III)
(I)
(II)
(III)
(I)
Bulk Carrier
162 2,500 6.5%
128 2,551 5.0% 116
Other Cargo Ship72
2,002 3.6%
421,995 2.1% 45*Chemical Tanker
12
544
2.2%
5
573
0.9%
8
Oil Tanker
6
370
1.6%
3
372
0.8%
5
Gas Carrier
1
268
0.4%
3
282
1.1%
1
MODU
0
1
0.0%
0
1
0.0%
0
Passenger Ship
0
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
0
High Speed Craft
0
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
0
Total
253 5,685 4.5%
181 5,774 3.1% 175
Note:

1.
2.

2021
(II)
2,253
1,805
573
801
266
1
0
0
5,699

(III)
5.1%
2.5%
1.4%
0.6%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%

( I ): No. of Detentions, ( II ): No. of NK SMC Ships, ( III ): Detention Ratio = ( I ) / ( II ) %* Chemical Tanker includes Oil/ Chemical Tanker.

Table 3.2.3 shows “the number of detentions” and “the number of ISM detention cases” where ships weredetained due to detainable deficiencies related to ISM Code (hereafter “ISM detainable deficiency”). Also,“ISM detainable deficiencies ratio per PSC country” is shown.
Table 3.2.3 Number of Detentions and Detention Ratioof ISM Detention Cases per PSC Country
Country
Australia
China
Indonesia
RussiaUSA
Belgium
Italy
EUUK
Other Members
Other Countries
Total
Note:

(I)
15
23
2
6
9
4
4
5
12
16
96

2019
(II)
(III)
53
28.3%
70
32.9%
19
0.0%
21
28.6%
14
64.3%
4
100%
4
100%
5
100%
17
70.6%
46
34.8%
253 37.9%

(I)
25
3
6
7
5
7
2
1
10
14
80

2020
(II)
(III)
62
40.3%
5
60.0%
12
50.0%
21
33.3%
7
71.4%
8
87.5%
2
100%
1
100%
14
71.4%
49
28.6%
181
44.2%

( I ): No. of the ISM detention case
( II ): No. of detentions of NK SMC ships. (Notwithstanding the reason of detention)( III ): ISM detainable deficiencies ratio = ( I ) / ( II ) %

32

(I)
16
3
4
5
6
7
3
3
11
10
68

2021
(II)
(III)
40
40.0%
12
25.0%
18
22.2%
24
20.8%
7
85.7%
8
87.5%
6
50.0%
3
100%
21
52.4%
36
27.8%
175
38.9%

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

3.3
Study of ISM Detainable Deficiencies
This clause introduces studies of ISM detainable deficiencies recorded in Australia, Belgium and USA which
are top 3 countries of the number of ISM detention cases in 2021 and a part of objective evidences of the
ISM detention by each country.
Deficiency Codes of ISM deficiencies specified by Tokyo MOU which Australia participates in and USCG
which USA organizes are as following table 3.3. Also, a deficiency code of ISM deficiencies specified by
Paris MOU which Belgium participates in is an only “15150 - ISM”.
Table 3.3 Deficiency Code per ISM Code Element (Tokyo MOU and USCG)
Def. Code
ISM Code Element
Defective Item
15101
2
Safety and Environmental Policy
15102
3
Company Responsibility and Authority
15103
4
Designated Person(s)15104
5Masters Responsibility and Authority
15105
6
Resources and Personnel
15106
7
Shipboard Operations
15107
8
Emergency Preparedness
15108
9
Reports of Non-conf., accidents & hazardous occur.
15109
10
Maintenance of the ship and equipment
15110
11Documentation- ISM
15111
12Company Verification, Review and Evaluation
15112
13
Certification, Verification and Control
15113
Other (ISM) (for USCG)
15199
Other (ISM) (for TOKYO MOU)

Def. Code
15150

Deficiency Code per ISM Code Element (Paris MOU)
Defective Item
ISM

33

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

3.3.1
Australia
Table 3.3.1(a) shows the number of ISM detainable deficiencies per Deficiency Code. Table 3.3.1(b) shows
the number of deficiencies regarded as the evidences of ISM detainable deficiencies per Deficiency Code. In
Australia, “15199 - Other (ISM)” was most frequently recorded as ISM detainable deficiencies. For the casewhere plural ISM code elements corresponding to the objective evidences of ISM detention were found,“15199 - Other (ISM)” was recorded. Typical objective evidences of the ISM detainable deficiency aremainly as follows.
・
・
・
・
・
・
・

Damage and/or wastage of securing devices (cleats) or cleat crutches of cargo hatch covers
Malfunction of fire damper’s operations
Standard compass error not determined once a watch
ECDIS alarms not properly configured
Oil leakage and peeled off insulating material on piping of generator engine
Each boat has not been lowered in abandon ship drill
Sewage treatment plant has not been operated in accordance with manufacture’s instructions

Code
15104
15106
15107
15109
15199

Code
03105
03108
04102
04110
04114
07105
07113
07115
07199
10105
10112
10135
11104
11129
13199
14402
18425

Table 3.3.1(a) Number of ISM Detainable Deficiencies per Deficiency Code
Item
2019
2020
Masters responsibility and authority
0
1
Shipboard operations
4
3
Emergency preparedness
5
1
Maintenance of the ship and equipment
3
5
Other (ISM)
8
17
Total
20
27

2021
0
4
2
4
6
16

Table 3.3.1(b) Number of deficiencies regarded as objective evidencesof ISM Detainable Deficiencies per Deficiency Code
Item
No.
RemarkCovers (hatchway-, portable- etc.)2
Ventilators, air pipes, casings
2
Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes
3
Abandon ship drills
3
Emergency source of power - EG
2
Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting div.
2
Fire pumps and its pipes
Fire-dampers
Other (fire safety)
Magnetic compass
Electronic charts (ECDIS)
Monitoring of voyage or passage plan
Rescue boats
Operational readiness of lifesaving app.
Other (machinery)
Sewage treatment plant
Access/ structural features (ship)
Others

34

2
2
4
2
3
2
2
2
4
4
2
61

Oil leakage of G.E.

Water leakage of machineries

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

3.3.2
Belgium
Table 3.3.2(a) shows the number of the ISM detainable deficiencies per Deficiency Code. Table 3.3.2(b)shows the number of deficiencies regarded as objective evidences of ISM detainable deficiencies per
Deficiency Code. Typical objective evidences of the ISM detainable deficiency are mainly as follows.
・
・
・
・
・
・
・
・

Invalid seafarer’s employment agreement
Damages of steps and handrails of gangway
Crews are unfamiliar with operation of fire pumps
Alert displaying in fire detection’s panel
Fireman’s outfits not meet SOLAS requirements
Malfunction of fuel oil shut-off valves
Damages of side ropes and steps of pilot ladder
Not latest nautical publications

Code
15150

Code
01220
02109
03105
04102
04109
04114
07105
07106
07108
07111
07114
07117
08107
10101
10105
10112
10116
13102
13104

Table 3.3.2(a) Number of ISM Detainable Deficiencies per Deficiency CodeItem2019 2020
ISM
6
11

Table 3.3.2(b) Number of Deficiencies Regarded as the Evidencesof ISM Detainable Deficiencies per Deficiency Code
Item
No.
Remark7
Seafarer' employment agreement
3
Permanent means of access3
Covers (hatchway-, portable- etc.)
4
Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes
2
Fire drills
2
Emergency source of power - EG
2
Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting div.
5
Fire detection and alarm system
2
Readily availability of fire fighting equip.
4
Personal equipment for fire safety
Remote Means of control (opening, pumps,
4
ventilation, etc.) Machinery spaces
Jacketed high pressure lines and oil leakage
2
alarm
2
Machinery controls alarm
Pilot ladders and hoist/pilot transfer
3
arrangements
2
Magnetic compass
2
Electronic charts (ECDIS)
3
Nautical publications
2
Auxiliary engine
2
Bilge pumping arrangements
Others
88

35

2021
10

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

3.3.3
USA
Table 3.3.3(a) shows the number of ISM detainable deficiencies per Deficiency Code. Table 3.3.3(b) shows
the number of deficiencies regarded as the evidences of ISM detainable deficiencies per Deficiency Code. In
USA, “15109 - Maintenance of the ship and equipment” was most frequently recorded as ISM detainable
deficiencies. Typical objective evidences of the ISM detainable deficiency are mainly as follows.
・
・
・
・
・
・

Damage and/or wastage of securing devices (cleats) or cleat crutches of cargo hatch covers
Crews are unfamiliar with tests of steering gear’s alarm systems
Smoke detectors with vinyl cover.
Crews are unfamiliar with operations of fixed fire extinguishing arrangement (CO2)
Not cleanliness of E/R with rubbish and waste oil
Water leakage from pumps

Code
15101
15106
15108
15109
15110
15111
15112

Code
02101
02105
07106
07108
07109
07110
07112
07114
07126
09210
11119
13101
14608
16101

Table 3.3.3(a) Number of ISM Detainable Deficiencies per Deficiency Code
Item
2019
2020
2021
Safety and environmental policy2
10
Shipboard operations2
2
1
Reports of NCs, accidents and hazardous occur.
010Maintenance of the ship and equipment
13
3
7
Documentation - ISM010
Company verification, review and evaluation
1
0
0
Certification, verification and control
1
0
0
TOTAL
19
8
8

Table 3.3.3(b) Number of Deficiency Regarded as the Evidencesof ISM Detainable Deficiency per Deficiency Code
Item
No.
Remark2
Closing devices/watertight doors
2
Steering gear
3
Fire detection and alarm system
2
Readily availability of fire fighting equipment
2
Fixed fire extinguishing installation
1
Fire fighting equipment and appliances
Emergency Escape Breathing Device and1
disposition
Remote Means of control (opening, pumps,
1
ventilation, etc.) Machinery spaces
3
Oil accumulation in engine room2
Machinery1
Immersion suits
1
Propulsion main engine
Incinerator including operations and operating1
manual1
Ship security defects
Others1636ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

Chapter 4
Statistical Analysis of NK MLC Ships Detained by PSC (MLC, 2006)
4.1
GeneralThis chapter presents statistical analysis from the viewpoints of MLC, 2006 on the ships holding Maritime
Labour Certificate issued by the Society (hereafter, “NK MLC ships”) based on the PSC Inspection Reports
having been obtained. Table 4.1 shows the registered number of the NK MLC ships. 90.4% of the NK MLC
ships are classed with this Society.

Classification
NK class
Other class
Total

Table 4.1 Number of NK MLC Ships (per Class)
2019
2020
4,847
88.6%
4,957
89.3%
623
11.4%
596
10.7%
5,191
5,470

2021
4,897
90.4%
522
9.6%
5,419

4.2
Statistics of Detentions of NK MLC Ships
As of the end of April 2022, 101 countries have ratified MLC, 2006 and many countries have been carryingout PSC inspections based on the convention. For detailed situations of the enforcement by the countries,
please refer to the following website of ILO.
http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:11300:0::NO:11300:P11300_INSTRUMENT_ID:312331:NO

The table 4.2 shows the number of detention cases due to deficiencies related to MLC, 2006 (hereafter,“MLC deficiencies”) for NK MLC ships in the last 3 years.

Table 4.2 Number of Detention Cases due to MLC Deficiencies (per PSC country)
Country
2019
2020
2021
Australia
462
Canada
1
3
5
Japan
0
3
1
Russia2
3
3
Belgium
2
7
5Germany
0
4
5
EU
Italy
4
0
3
Other EU Members
148
Other Countries
4
2
3
Total
18
32
35

37

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

4.3
Study of MLC Detainable Deficiencies
This clause introduces the studies of detainable deficiencies related to MLC, 2006 (hereafter, “MLC
detainable deficiencies”) and MLC deficiencies recorded as objective evidences of ISM detainable
deficiencies for NK MLC ships in 2021. In this Chapter, the deficiencies with Codes listed in Table 4.3.1 aredefined as MLC deficiencies.
The number of MLC detainable deficiencies per the deficiency code is shown in Table 4.3.2. Also, top major
MLC deficiencies regarded as objective evidences of ISM detainable deficiencies are shown in Table 4.3.3.
As for the MLC detainable deficiencies, “01220 - Seafarers' employment agreement (SEA)” was mostfrequently recorded on NK MLC ships in 2021. And “18203 - wages” followed it.
On the other hand, the top 3 deficiencies recorded as objective evidences of ISM detainable deficiencies in
MLC deficiencies are as followings.
・Top.1: “01220 - Seafarers' employment agreement (SEA)” (12)・Top.2: “18302 – Sanitary facilities” (6)・

Top.3: “01308 – Records of rest” (5)・

Top.3: “18299 – Other (Conditions of employment)” (5)・

Top.3: “18408 – Electrical ” (5)・

Top.3: “18416 – Ropes and wires” (5)・

Top.3: “18420 – Cleanliness of engine room” (5)・

Top.3: “18425 – Access/ structural features (ship)” (5)Table 4.3.1 Deficiency Codes of MLC Deficiencies - Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU
Deficiency Code
Category / Item (Description in the List of Tokyo MOU Def. Codes)
01xxx
Certificates & Documentation-Crew Certificate
01218
Medical Certificate
012
01219
Training and Qualification MLC- Personal Safety Training
01220
Seafarers` Employment Agreement (SEA)
01221
Record of Employment-Document
Max. Hours of Work or Min, Hours of Rest
01307
(Table of Working Hours)
Records of Seafarer’s Daily Hours of Work or Rest
01308
(Records of Rest)
013
01330
Procedure for Complaint under MLC, 2006
01331
Collective Bargaining Agreement
Certificate or documentary evidence of financial security for
01336
repatriation
Certificate or documentary evidence of financial security relating to01337
shipowners liability
18xxx
MLC, 2006 (Labour Conditions)
Minimum Requirements to Work on a Ship
18101-04 & 99
(Minimum Requirements for Seafarers)
182
01-05 & 99
Conditions of Employment
183
01-28 & 99
Accommodation, Recreational Facilities, Food and Catering
18401-32 & 99
Health Protection, Medical Care, Social Security
38

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

Table 4.3.2 Number of MLC Detainable Deficiencies per Deficiency Code
Item
No.
Country (*ISO 表記)
Certificates & Documentation
ESP
Medical certificate
1
BEL,CAN,DNK,ITA,PAN
Seafarer' employment agreement (SEA)
16
BEL,CAN,CHN
Records of rest
3
CAN
Collective bargaining agreement
1
Labour Conditions (MLC, 2006)
1
PAN
Other (Minimum requirements)
2
CAN
Legal documentation on work and rest hours
8
AUS,CAN,IDN,ITA
Wages
1
FRA
Calculation and payment of wages
5
AUS,IND,JPN
Other (Conditions of employment)
1
DEU
Noise, vibration and other ambient factors
4
DEU,PRT,ROU
Sanitary facilities
1
DEU
Hospital accommodation (Sickbay)
1
GBR
Cleanliness
3
DEU,DNK,ITA
Provisions quantity
1
DEU
Heating, air conditioning and ventilation
Cold room, cold room cleanliness, cold room
18324
4
CAN,DEU
temperature
18401 Medical Equipment, medical chest, medical guide
1
DEU
18402 Access to on shore medical doctor or dentist
1
IDN
18407 Lighting (Working spaces)
1
DEU
18408 Electrical
1
RUS
18418 Winches and capstans
1
ESP
18419 Adequate lighting- mooring arrangements
1
DEU
18420 Cleanliness of engine room
4
CAN,DEU,MLT,PRT
18425 Access/ structural features (ship)
1
RUS
Risk evaluation, training and instruction to
18432
1
AUS
seafarers
51
Total*ISO description of the country
ISO 表記Country
ISO 表記Country
ISO 表記Country
AUS
Australia
BEL
Belgium
CAN
Canada
CHN
China
DEU
Germany
DNK
Denmark
ESP
Spain
FRA
FranceGBR
UK
IDN
Indonesia
ITA
Italy
JPN
Japan
MLT
Malta
PAN
PanamaPRT
Portugal
ROU
Romania
RUS
Russia
Code
01xxx
01218
01220
01308
01331
18xxx
18199
18202
18203
18204
18299
18301
18302
18305
18313
18314
18321

39

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

Code
01xxx
01220
01308
18xxx
18203
18299
18302
18312
18313
18324
18401
18408
18409
18416
18418
18420
18424
18425
18431
18432
18499
-

Table 4.3.3 Major MLC Deficiencies Regarded as the Evidencesof ISM Detainable Deficiencies
Item
Certificates & Documentation
Seafarer' employment agreement (SEA)
Records of rest
Labour Conditions (MLC, 2006)
Wages
Other (Conditions of employment)
Sanitary facilities
Galley, handling room (maintenance)
Cleanliness
Cold room, cold room cleanliness, cold room temperature
Medical Equipment, medical chest, medical guide
ElectricalDangerous areas
Ropes and wires
Winches and capstans
Cleanliness of engine room
Steam pipes, pressure pipes, wires (insulation)
Access/ structural features (ship)
Investigation after accident
Risk evaluation, training and instruction to seafarers
Other (Health protection, medical care …)
Other Deficiencies with 18xxx
Total

No.
12
5
4
5
6
4
4
3
3
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
3
3
4
32
120

(Reference) PSC Inspections on Working and Living Conditions in Countries not ratifying
MLC, 2006
Regarding the matters of ILO, Tokyo MOU, Paris MOU and other MOUs had been carrying out PSC
inspections using deficiency codes 09000 series “Working and Living Conditions” since the time before
implementation of MLC, 2006. These codes are still used by the countries in which MLC, 2006 has not yet
come into force. Table 4.3.4 shows the number of detainable deficiencies with the Code pointed out in 2021.
Table 4.3.4 Number of ILO Detainable Deficiencies (per Deficiency Code)
Code
Item
092xx
Working Conditions
09131
Cold room
09219
Pipes, wires (insulation)
Total

40

No.
1
1
2

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

Chapter 5
Statistical Data from Tokyo MOU, Paris MoU and USCG
Several regional MOUs and Port States publicly announce their PSC data on their websites and publish
Annual Reports every year. Based on the public data available, this Chapter introduces abstracts of therecent results of detentions by the Tokyo MOU, the Paris MoU and the USCG in 2021.
The full text of each respective Annual Report can be obtained from the following websites.
Tokyo MOU
Paris MoU
USCG

http://www.tokyo-mou.org
https://www.parismou.org/
https://www.uscg.mil/

41

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

5.1 Tokyo MOU
In 2021, 22,730 inspections were carried out in the Tokyo MOU region, and 526 ships were detained due
to serious deficiencies found onboard. A total of 3,728 inspections were carried out remotely amounting
to 16.4% of the total number of inspections.
5.1.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities
Table 5.1.1 shows the numbers of Port State inspections carried out by each Port State in 2021.
Table 5.1.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Port Authorities (Tokyo MOU)Country
Australia 2)
Canada 3)
Chile
China
Fiji
Hong Kong, China
Indonesia
Japan
Republic of Korea
Malaysia
Marshall Islands
New Zealand
Panama 3)
Papua New Guinea
Peru
Philippines
Russia Federation 3)
Singapore
Thailand
Vanuatu
Viet Nam
Total

No. of Inspection
2019
2020
2021
3,222 3,021 2,820
703
583
643
759
533
712
7,756
787 3,673
36
5
3
710
256
261
1,766 1,949 2,555
5,023 2,323 2,108
1,950 1,601 1,470
1,413
738
895
11
0
0
228
146
105
0
125
246
187
75
104
462
189
478
2,302 2,130 2,068
1,171 1,410 1,445
1,199
494
443
760
935
908
8
2
1
1,706 2,113 1,792
31,372 19,415 22,730

No. of Detentions 1)

Detention ratio (%)

2019
163
12
7
434
1
20
73
93
59
11
2
6
0
3
1
7
65
21
0
0
5
983

2019
5.06
1.71
0.92
5.60
2.78
2.82
4.13
1.85
3.03
0.78
18.18
2.63
0
1.60
0.22
0.30
5.55
1.75
0
0
0.29
3.13

2020
178
19
8
56
0
6
47
43
63
2
0
3
4
0
0
4
48
5
1
0
6
493

2021
159
24
5
102
1
9
54
52
49
9
0
0
3
2
2
5
41
0
6
0
3
526

1) Numbers of deficiencies and detentions do not include those related to security.
2) Data for Australia is also provided to Indian Ocean.
3) Data is only for the Pacific ports.

42

2020 2021
5.89
5.64
3.26
3.73
1.50
0.70
7.12
2.78
0 33.33
2.34
3.45
2.41
2.11
1.85
2.47
3.94
3.33
0.27
1.01
0
0
2.05
0
3.20
1.22
0
1.92
0
0.42
0.19
0.24
3.40
2.84
1.01
0
0.11
0.66
0
0
0.28
0.17
2.54
2.31

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

5.1.2 Port State Inspections carried out remotely
Table 5.1.2 shows the numbers of Port State inspections carried out remotely.
Table 5.1.2 Port State Inspections carried out by Port Authorities (Tokyo MOU)
Initial Inspection
Country

China
Japan
Republicof Korea
Singapore
Viet Nam

Physical
No.
595
2,040

%
16.20
96.77

1,466

99.73

129
1,532

29.12
85.49

Follow-up Inspection

Remote

Total
No.

No.
%
3,078 83.80 3,673
68
3.23 2,108
4

PhysicalRemote

Total
No.

No.
%
No.
%
500 29.14 1,216 70.86 1,716
451 95.35
22
4.65
473

0.27 1,470

339 96.03

14

3.97

353

443
314 70.88
260 14.51 1,792

2
7.69
178 99.44

24 92.31
1
0.56

26
179

5.1.3 Black List of Flag States
Table 5.1.3 shows the Black List of Flag States announced in the Tokyo MOU Annual Report.
Table 5.1.3 Black List of Flag States (Tokyo MOU)
No. ofInspections
2019-2021
224
771
892

Flag State
Mongolia
Togo
Sierra Leone

43

No. ofDetentions
2019-2021
33
100
89

Black toGrey limit
22
66
75

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

5.1.4 Recognized Organization Performance
Table 5.1.4 shows the detention data of IACS affiliated Recognized Organizations in the Tokyo MOU
Annual Report.
Table 5.1.4 Inspections and Detentions per Recognized Organization (Tokyo MOU) (*)
No. ofNo. ofDetention
Recognized Organization
Inspections
Detentions
ratio (%)
2019-2021
2019-2021
American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)
3,061
56
1.83
Bureau Veritas (BV)
3,190
73
2.29
China Classification Society (CCS)
2,167
23
2.29
Croatian Register of Shipping (CRS)
32
1
3.13
DNV AS (DNV)
5,602
107
1.91
Indian Register of Shipping (IRS)
44
3
6.82
Korean Register (KR)
2,037
41
2.01
Lloyd's Register (LR)
3,414
61
1.79
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (NK)
8,337
135
1.62
Polish Register of Shipping (PRS)
54
2
3.77
RINA Services S.p.A. (RINA)
1,013
17
1.68
Russian Maritime Register of Shipping (RS)
125
1
0.80
(*) According to the Tokyo MOU annual report, in cases where a ship’s certificates were issued by more than one
recognized organization (RO), the number of inspections would be counted towards both organizations, while thenumber of detentions would be counted only towards the RO that issued the certificate relating to the detainable
deficiency or deficiencies.

5.1.5 Deficiencies per Category
Figure 5.1.5 shows the number of deficiencies by category for the three years from 2018 through 2020.
9893

Lifesaving applicances

4177
5192

2019
13178

Fire safety measures

Stability, structure and related equipment

2020

5902
5929

2021

2507
1109
1368
5472

Load lines

2457
2561
9179

Safety of navigation

3681
4743
7171
5296
5773

Working nad living condtions

6564

Pollution prevention

ISM deficiencies

2708
2913
1486
871
899
31678

Others

16727
19146

Fig. 5.1.5 Deficiencies per Category (Tokyo MOU)
44

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

5.2 Paris MoU
In 2021, 15,387 inspections were carried out in the Paris MoU region, and 582 ships were detained due toserious deficiencies found onboard.

5.2.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities
Table 5.2.1 shows the numbers of Port State Inspections carried out by each respective Port State from2019 through 2021.
Table 5.2.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities (Paris MoU)Country
Belgium
Bulgaria
CanadaCroatia
CyprusDenmark
Estonia
FinlandFranceGermany
GreeceIceland
IrelandItaly
LatviaLithuania
Malta
Netherlands
NorwayPolandPortugal
Romania
1)
RussiaSlovenia
Spain
SwedenUnited Kingdom
1)

No. of Inspections
2019
1,010
342
1,237
299
106
491
251
280
1,047
1,116
987
64
299
1,447
309
253
181
1,287
555
492
528
489
1,177
140
1,517
570
1,434

2020
571
320
1,115
219
31
542
144
220
756
611
765
79
222
1,231
187
372
157
658
355
468
338
534
739
135
1,283
245
862

2021
721
304
1,198
270
107
501
232
250
1,037
825
72
172
1,359
225
365
213
770
417
536
426
441
748
179
1,731
465
1,054

No. of Detentions
2019
36
12
25
9
9
4
1
0
24
19
50
1
12
83
3
0
8
22
14
19
3
25
57
1
43
8
38

2020
50
7
37
6
1
4
2
1
17
29
29
3
16
57
3
1
3
4
5
9
5
6
25
3
22
9
20

2021
45
4
52
9
6
2
0
1
30
35
28
0
5
139
2
0
7
15
17
14
12
14
27
0
33
6
32

Detention ratio (%)
2019
3.56
3.51
2.02
3.01
8.49
0.81
0.40
0.00
2.29
1.70
5.07
1.56
4.01
5.74
0.97
0.00
4.42
1.71
2.52
3.86
0.57
5.11
4.84
0.71
2.83
1.40
2.65

2020
8.76
2.19
3.32
2.74
3.23
0.74
1.39
0.45
2.25
4.75
3.79
3.80
7.21
4.63
1.60
0.27
1.91
0.61
1.41
1.92
1.48
1.12
3.38
2.22
1.71
3.67
2.32

Only movements to the Russian ports in the Baltic Azov, Caspian and Barents Sea are included.

45

2021
6.24
1.33
4.34
3.33
5.61
0.40
0.00
0.40
2.89
4.46
3.39
0.00
2.91
10.23
0.89
0.00
3.29
1.95
4.08
2.61
2.82
3.17
3.61
0.00
1.91
1.29
3.04

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

5.2.2 Black List of Flag States
Table 5.2.2 shows the Black List of Flag States announced by the Paris MoU.
Table 5.2.2 Black List of Flag States (Paris MoU)
Inspections
Detentions
Flag State
Risk
2019-2021
2019-2021
Cameroon

69

15

Togo

361

53

Moldova, Republic of

328

48

Albania60

11Comoros

315

39

Algeria

69

10

Egypt

46

7

High Risk

Black toGrey Limit
934

Medium toHigh Risk

31
830

Medium
Risk

9
7

5.2.3
Recognized Organization Performance
Table 5.2.3 shows the PSC performance of IACS affiliated Recognized Organizations among thoseannounced by the Paris MoU for the three years from 2019 through 2021.
Table 5.2.3 Recognized Organization Performance Table (Paris MoU)
No. ofNo. of
Performance
Recognized Organization
Inspections Detentions
Level
2019-2021
2019-2021
American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)5,633
2
DNV AS (DNV)
21,68914
Lloyd’s Register (LR)10,67912
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (NK)7,726
13
Bureau Veritas (BV)
10,26323
High
RINA Services S.p.A. (RINA)
4,794
11
China Classification Society (CCS)
850
1
Russian Maritime Register of Shipping (RS)2,096
5
Korean Register (KR)1,402
3
Polski Rejestr Statkow (Polish Register of501
5Shipping) (PRS)
MediumCroatian Register of Shipping (CRS)
134
0
Indian Register of Shipping (IRS)
177
2

46

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

5.3 USCG
In 2021, 8,663 PSC examinations were conducted by the USCG during the year, and 63 ships weredetained due to serious deficiencies found onboard.
.
5.3.1 USCG Statistics
Table 5.3.1 shows the number of safety related detentions for the three years from 2019 through 2021.
Table 5.3.1 Detentions by Year (Safety)
Year
2019
2020
2021

No. ofNo. of
Safety Exams Detentions
8,622
7,383
8,663

95
57
63

AnnualDetention
Ratio (%)

3-Year Average
Detention
Ratio (%)

1.10
0.77
0.73

1.07
1.02
0.87

5.3.2 Targeted Flag States (Safety)
The USCG targets Flag Administrations for additional PSC examinations if their detention ratio scores
higher than the overall three-year rolling average detention ratio and if an Administration is associatedwith more than one detention in the past three years. The following flag states having a detention ratio
higher than the overall average were listed as targeted flag states.
Table 5.3.2 USCG Targeted Flag States (Safety)
2019-2021
Flag State
Detention
Category
Ratio (%)
Belgium
2.22
Bolivia*
26.32
Israel9.68
Mexico
4.40
St. Kitts and Nevis
11.76
High Risk
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
5.11
Tanzania
9.68
Togo
3.26
Turkey3.33
Antigua and Barbuda
1.42
Cyprus1.71
Panama1.01
Medium Risk
Portugal
1.22
Vanuatu
1.27

47

ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control

5.3.3 Recognized Organization Performance (Safety)
Table 5.3.3 shows the PSC performance of IACS affiliated Recognized Organizations among thoseannounced by the USCG.
Table 5.3.3 Recognized Organization Performance Table (USCG)
2019-2021
2019-2021
Vessel
RO-Related
Examinations Detentions
American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)5838
0Bureau Veritas (BV)3834
7
China Classification Society (CCS)607
1
Croatian Register of Shipping (CRS)
41
0
DNV
9790
3
Indian Register of Shipping (IRS)38
0
Korean Register (KR)998
1
Lloyd's Register (LR)7273
6
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (NK)6991
4
Polish Register of Shipping (PRS)
65
0RINA Services S.p.A. (RINA)
1242
1
Russian Maritime Register of Shipping (RS)1132
Recognized Organization

Detention
Ratio (%)
0.00
0.18
0.16
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.10
0.08
0.05
0.00
0.08
0.00

Recognized Organizations are evaluated on their RO-related Detention Ratio on PSC over theprevious three years.

48

Port State Control Annual Report[English]Survey Department
3-3 Kioi-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0094 Japan
Tel: +81-3-5226-2027,-2028
Fax: +81-3-5226-2029
E-mail: svd@classnk.or.jp

www.classnk.com

June 2022