ECCJ

METI

IPEEC

DGNREEC

EE&C-SSN

ACE

RECOGNISED ENERGY MANAGEMENT BESTPRACTICES AND AWARD PROGRAMSFOR BEST PRACTICES

Report on the 8th Annual Energy Management Action Network
held on Friday, 3 February 2017,
Double Tree hotel, Jakarta, Indonesia

Prepared by Energy Conservation Center, Japan
In cooperation with ASEAN Centre for Energy

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 2
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5
2. Session Summaries ................................................................................................................ 9
3.Workshop Survey Insights .................................................................................................... 18
4.Summary of recommendations ............................................................................................ 23
5. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 25
ANNEX 1 - Workshop Agenda
ANNEX 2 - Participants list
ANNEX 3 - Questionnaire sheet

List of Acronyms
ACE
AMS
APAEC
BAT
BP
DGNREEC
ECCJ
EE&C
EMAK
EnMS
EPC
IPEEC
MEMR
METI
PEEN
RIKEN

ASEAN Centre for Energy
ASEAN MEMBER STATESASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation
Best Available Technology
Best PracticeDirectorate-General of New Renewable Energy and Energy
Conservation
Energy Conservation Center, Japan
Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Energy Management Action Network
Energy Management System
Energy Performance Contract
International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of Indonesia
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan
Indonesian National Energy Efficiency Award
National Energy Conservation Master Plan (RIKEN) of Indonesia

1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The 8th Energy Management Action Network (EMAK) Workshop was held on 3 February
2017, in Jakarta Indonesia. The workshop was jointly organised by the Energy Conservation
Center, Japan (ECCJ) and the ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE) sponsored by the Japanese
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) and was supported by the Directorate
General of New Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation (DGNREEC) under the Ministryof Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR) of Indonesia.
The workshop provided rich information sharing opportunities on global experiences andtrends on energy management best practices in the building and industry sectors. It also
explored the challenges and opportunities of progressing energy efficiency in Indonesia. In
addition, the workshop covered the technical merits, potential effectiveness,environmental, economic and social implications and contribution of energy efficiency andconservation (EE&C) to the ASEAN regional target of reducing energy intensity by 20% until
2020.
Under the theme, ‘Recognised Energy Management Best Practices and Award Programs forBest Practices’, the workshop placed greater emphasis on optimising the practical
approaches on energy management, investment mechanism in EE&C measures and bestpractices to realise energy efficiency project implementation.
The workshop was attended by 90 participants. They represented government ministries
and agencies, building and industry practitioners, academe, and associations andinternational organisations. 97% of post-workshop survey respondents rated the workshop
as good, very good and excellent. The results also showed that the workshop was very
useful in enhancing the information and knowledge of participants in energy management
best practices and award programs.
EMAK was established in 2009 to promote the improvement of EE&C in the industry andcommercial sectors under the International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation(IPEEC). The primary objective of EMAK is to contribute to the accelerated uptake of energy
management practices and systems in the industry and commercial sectors throughplatforms to share proven and innovative practices and through capacity building activities.
This includes creating a network of policymakers and industry practitioners, as well as
establishing platforms to share best practices on policy frameworks, human resource
development, and state-of-the-art management systems.
The workshop contributed to international knowledge sharing and capacity building onenergy management best practices. The major themes highlighted in the workshop were:

The role and significance of Energy Management Systems (EnMS) as the foundationfor energy efficiency improvement in industry. This was demonstrated throughinternational examples and the commitment of the Indonesian government toencourage the uptake of EnMS to the ISO 50001 standard. Energy management is a
key to improving efficiency, reducing energy use and abating greenhouse gas
emissions. The reduction in recurrent energy demand, through the greater

2





involvement of public sector in embracing energy management, is a good approachto realising greater energy savings.
The important link between the introduction of EnMS and award programs. The
workshop shared proven efforts and best practices in energy efficiency
improvement. Through workshop presentations, policy makers and practitioners
were provided with inclusive examples of policy, technology, and practical
approaches and award programs.
The benefits and opportunities of international knowledge sharing on the energy
management efficiency award programs. The workshop brought together selectedcase studies on ASEAN Energy Awards, National Energy Awards of Indonesia andJapan’s Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award, Energy Management LeadershipAward and TOP TENs as platforms to provide public recognition for excellent work in
the energy efficiency sector. Award programs are helping in encouraging thepromotion and dissemination of best practices within building and industry sectors
to achieve energy savings, reduce CO2 emissions and improve economic
competitiveness through the establishment and implementation of EnMS, keeping
autonomous small group activities or concerted efforts by some of the collaboratingorganisations and implementing advanced technology and /or excellent know-how.

The Indonesian government has made significant progress in energy efficiency improvement
in industries and buildings, thanks to the mandate of Government Regulation No. 70 (2009),
which stipulated that energy end-users who consume more than 6,000-ton oil equivalent(TOE) of primary energy supply per year should appoint an energy manager, conduct anenergy audit, and implement energy conservation best practices in industries and buildings.
For less than 6,000 TOE users, voluntary measures include appointing an energy manager,
conducting energy audits and implementing energy conservation. The workshop provided
opportunities to learn from the experiences of other countries and to broaden the networkof energy management practitioners. However, there is potential to optimize energy
efficiency implementation. Key recommendations to the Indonesian government are as
follows:
1. The Indonesian government should continue to encourage the building and industry
sectors to implement EnMS through the adoption of best practices and award
programs. This will provide an important foundation for progressing energy efficiency
policy and targets by enabling and encouraging the sectors to implement energy
management concepts in their energy facilities through awareness-raising and capacitybuilding, best practice-sharing and award programs. Sharing best practices, particularly
on various approaches towards policy making and success stories, can help countries
accelerate energy efficiency improvement and learn from international experiences inthese areas.
2. There should be continued focus on the multiple benefits of energy efficiency tomotivate the building and industrial sectors to take actions and maximize businessoutcomes and growth. The introduction of practical approaches and technologies areproven ways to improve energy efficiency in the building and industrial sectors. However,they require a greater involvement and partnership among stakeholders to achieve
successful policies and programs. The EMAK workshop is an effective platform in3

bridging the gap among stakeholders though exchange of ideas and views to findsolutions and steps forward for energy efficiency development.
3. Recognition through award programs needs to be continuously promoted and updated
to encourage the implementation of energy management in buildings and industry.
National, regional and international award programs are powerful platforms toencourage greater private sector participation (including small and medium enterprises[SMEs) and large industries) to implement energy efficiency projects with efficient
practices and technologies. Through awards, efforts on EE&C will be recognised bygovernments and the private sector at national, regional and international levels.
4. There are some efforts that need to be undertaken to sustain award programs,
namely: i) the value of the brand, such as: global PR effect of the logo, opportunities tolearn, publicity and further development; ii) sustainable system for applicants andpromoters, such as: evaluation methodology, composition of the examinationcommittee and evaluation process; iii) application of best practices, such as: how to
support the dissemination of energy management best practices (e.g. Energy
Management Systems, autonomous group activity, advanced technology and/or
excellent know-how); iv) promotion of award programs, such as: how to raise
motivation to participate in the competition, promotion of tools (e.g. award ceremony,
trophy and unique logo), and capacity building effect of the process (e.g. presentation
event); and v) importance of realising the objectives related to BATs and BPs, such as:
optimising the evaluation criteria and selection procedure, promoting cooperation
between private and public sectors, and promoting the application of the cases throughseminar, workshops and other related events, etc.
The report and video recordings of the presentations, as well as the presentation materials,
will be made available on the IEA’s and IPEEC’s EMAK websites, ECCJ’s website and ACE’s
website to ensure that the workshop’s outcomes are widely shared with policy makers andpractitioners not only in Indonesia but also in the ASEAN Member States and around theworld.

4

1. Introduction
The 8th Energy Management Action Network (EMAK) was held on 3 February 2017 in
Jakarta, Indonesia, on the theme of ‘Recognised Energy Management Best Practices andAward Programs for Best Practices’. It consisted of three sessions, namely: Session 1‘Energy Management Best Practices (Commercial Sector); Session 2 ‘Energy Management
Best Practices (Industrial Sectors); and Session 3 ‘Discussion on Knowledge to be shared
amongst Energy Management Award Programs’ (see annex 1). This report provides asummary and analysis of the presentations, discussion and recommendations that resulted
from the workshop. It also presents and analyses the feedback provided by participants inthe post-workshop survey questionnaire.
EMAK was established in 2009 to promote the improvement of EE&C in the industry andcommercial sectors under IPEEC. The primary objective of EMAK is to contribute to theaccelerated uptake of energy management practices and systems in the industry andcommercial sectors through platforms to share proven and innovative practices and throughcapacity-building activities. This includes creating a network of policy makers and industry
practitioners, as well as establishing platforms to share best practices on policy frameworks,
human resource development, and state-of-the-art management systems.
The series of EMAK Workshops have been held in the following locations: Paris, France –January 26-27, 2010
 Washington, USA - May 10, 2010
 Guilin, China –November 15, 2011 Tokyo, Japan –January 1, 2013
 Sydney, Australia –February 27, 2014
 New Delhi, India, -25 February, 2015
 Moscow, Russia – 19 November 2015
The 8th EMAK Workshop is first to be held in the ASEAN region, specifically in Indonesia. It
was jointly organised by ECCJ and ACE, sponsored by METI and supported by MEMR.
The aims of the workshop were to: learn and share experiences in designing and implementing energy management
systems and award programs in Indonesia, Japan, ASEAN and other countries.
 contribute towards national and international dialogue for awareness-raising andcapacity-building on energy efficiency and energy management.
 bridge the gap between EE&C policy measures and investment framework throughproven private sector financial capacity to implement energy efficiency projects for
growth and expansion of business.
 share and exchange knowledge and experience on award practices and how EE&C
initiatives are evaluated in those awards.
 as a concomitant effect, support the EE&C strategy goals under the ASEAN Plan of
Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC) 2016-2020 to promote EE&C throughinformation-sharing (raising awareness) and capacity-building.

5

The workshop was attended by 90 participants. They came from various organisations andinstitutions, namely: government ministries and agencies, financial institutions, technology
and services, international organisations, associations, academe and research institutions.
The list of participants is attached as Annex 1.
The speakers and presenters, with their presentation topics, are sammarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Speakers and Presenters
Title
1

Opening remarks

2

Welcome speech3

Welcome speech & keynote speech4

Welcome speech(VTR Message)

5

Welcome speech(VTR Message)

6

12

Presentation:“Challenge 50” Energy-Saving Initiative inPanasonic Tokyo Shiodome Building”
Presentation:“Realisation of Sustainable Energy by
Smart Campus”
Presentation: “Implementation of Energy
Management in Residential Building”
Presentation:“From Japan to the World! Energy
Management Evolution by Utilizing Group
Common EnMS”
Presentation:‘‘Best Practice from Energy Management
Leadership Award of PT IKPP Tangerang
Mill”
Presentation:“Best Practice Energy Management PT.
Petrokimia Gresik”
Panelist from ASEAN Energy Award

13

Panelist from Indonesian Energy Award

7

8
9

10

11

Speakers/Presenters
Mr. Jiro Sogawa, Managing Director,
The Energy Conservation Center, Japan
Mr. Christopher G. Zamora, Manager,
APAEC Department, ASEAN Centre for Energy,
Indonesia
Ms. Gita Lestari, Deputy Director,
Energy Conservation, Directorate General of
New Renewable Energy and Energy
Conservation, Ministry of Energy and Mineral
Resources Republic of Indonesia
Dr. Brian Motherway, Head of Energy
Efficiency Division,
International Energy Agency
Mr. Benoit Lebot, Executive Director,
IPEEC Secretariat, International Partnershipfor Energy Efficiency Cooperation
Mr.Takamitsu Yasukouchi, General Manager,
Intelligence & Liaison Department Panasonic
Corporation
Prof. Masaaki Bannai, Professor Emeritus,
Mie University
Dr. Budi Utomo, Residences Manager,
Apartemen Scientia Residences Serpong
Ms. Keiko Kurosawa, Coordinator,
Quality Assurance Department, F-TECH INC..

Mr. Kholisul Fatikhin, Director,
PT.Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Tbk

Ms. Anis Ernani, General Manager ofTechnology,
PT.Petrokimia Gresik
Mr. Rio Jon Piter Silitonga, Technical Officer,
APAEC Program, ASEAN Centre for Energy,
Indonesia
Ms. Gita Lestari, Deputy Director,

6

14

15

Panelist from Energy Conservation Grand
Prize Award and Energy Management
Leadership Award
Panelist from TOP TENs

16

Closing Remark

Technical Guidance and Cooperation,
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
Republic of Indonesia
Mr. Akira Ishihara, Special Adviser,
The Energy Conservation Center, JapanMr. Yasushi Tanaka, Senior General Manager,
International Collaboration Center
International Research & Communication
Department, The Energy Conservation
Center, Japan
Ms. Sayaka Shishido, Assistant Director,
International Affairs Office Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy Department, Agency
for Natural Resources and Energy, Ministry of
Economy, Trade and Industry, JapanThe key concepts shared in the workshop are highlighted in this report. The first of these isenergy management systems. Energy management systems include energy management
activities, practices and processes that may be implemented according to standards (e.g. ISO
50001). The objective of energy management systems is to achieve energy savings that
boost economic competitiveness by realising economic and sustainability benefits.
Another concept is award programs for energy management - best practices in industries
and buildings. Such initiatives promote the use of innovative energy-efficient methods andtechnologies to achieve energy savings and reduce CO2 emissions. Recognition throughaward programs needs to be continuously promoted, improved and disseminated toencourage the implementation of energy management in buildings and industries. The
ASEAN Energy Awards, National Energy Efficiency Award of Indonesia, Japan’s Energy
Conservation Grand Prize Award and other international energy awards are powerfulplatforms to encourage more private sector participation (including SMEs and large
industries) to implement energy efficiency projects with efficient practices and technologies.
Through these award programs, their efforts on EE&C will be recognised broadly bygovernment and the private sector, both national and international.
Overall, common objectives of award programs are: to encourage the utilization of resources efficiently
 to increase awareness in the building and industry sectors of best available
technology and energy-efficient solutions for process equipment and utility systems
 to raise awareness on the analysis of core process energy demand that can lead toenergy savings
 to increase awareness on new methods and ‘ways of working’ that can be applied to
identify and implement energy savings
 to promote successful demonstration projects within the building and industry
sectors
 to reduce energy-related CO2 emissions by implementing significant energy savings
 to encourage public-private sector participation and involvement in EE&C

7

8

2. Session Summaries
Opening remarks
Mr. Jiro Sogawa –Energy Conservation Centre, Japan
Mr. Jiro Sogawa, Managing Director of the Energy Conservation Center, Japanwelcomed all the participants to the 8th EMAK Workshop in Jakarta, Indonesia. He
introduced briefly that ECCJ is the core organisation responsible for promoting energy
efficiency and conservation, and has been contributing greatly to the improvement of
EE&C in Japan, ASEAN Member States (AMS) and other countries for many years. This
year, ECCJ is in charge of organising the EMAK Workshop sponsored by the Ministry of
Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Japan. He mentioned that the establishment of
the EMAK since 2009 is helping promote EE&C under IPEEC with the objective tocontribute to the dissemination of energy management best practices andestablishment of the EE&C network. This year, the 8th EMAK Workshop focused onenergy management best practices from Indonesia and Japan. In closing, he conveyed
his sincerest appreciation of MEMR of Indonesia, ACE, METI for their kind cooperationand of all the participants for their contribution to the workshop. He wished theparticipants a successful workshop.
Mr. Christopher Zamora-ASEAN Centre for Energy
Mr. Christopher G. Zamora, Manager of ACE welcomed all the participants in the 8th
EMAK Workshop in Jakarta. He expressed his sincerest thanks and appreciation of
MEMR, Indonesia for hosting the workshop, especially of DGNREEC under MEMR forthe excellent arrangement made for the workshop. He also expressed his sincerest
thanks to METI and ECCJ for their kind support for the workshop. He briefly introduced
ACE, an inter-governmental organisation established in 1999 by AMS, which plays a keyrole in advancing the goals of the ASEAN energy cooperation through theimplementation of the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC). The
APAEC serves as a blueprint for better energy cooperation in ASEAN. He mentionedthat EE&C is one of the key prioritized programs under the APAEC 2016-2025. The
objective of the EE&C program in AMS is to reduce energy intensity by 20% in 2020
based on 2005 level. Finally, he expressed his sincerest thanks and appreciation to METI
for its generous support to EMAK and ECCJ for the implementation arrangement
andMEMR of Indonesia for their interest and strong commitment to achieve the goalsof APAEC, and wished all a fruitful and productive discussion in the workshop.
Keynote speech
Ms. Gita Lestari-Directorate General of New Renewable Energy & Energy
Conservation
Ms. Gita Lestari, MEMR, warmly welcomed all the participants in the 8th EMAK
Workshop. She expressed her gratitude to ECCJ for supporting EMAK, and also to ACE
for its cooperation in arranging the workshop. She mentioned that Indonesia’s energy
needs have an average growth of 6.3% per year, driven by population growth andeconomic development. The needs have been mostly fulfilled by fossil fuels, which are
wasting valuable energy resources. MEMR conducted a survey and assessed thepotential for energy savings, which is estimated to be around 10-30% in demand
sectors. The savings can be achieved by adopting ISO 50001 Energy Management
9System and through the award activities in energy efficiency. She emphasised that the
National Energy Efficiency Award (PEEN), which was established in 2002, has been
providing steady and good-quality entries to the ASEAN Energy Awards. In this EMAK
Workshop, she hoped to share their experiences of conducting the award programs andto gain more information to further refine the PEEN Award. Finally, she expressed herappreciation to the organisers for their support and assistance in making the workshop
possible in Indonesia and wished everyone a fruitful discussion and a successful
workshop.
Welcome Speeches
Dr. Brian Motherway-International Energy Agency
Dr. Brian Motherway, Head of Energy Efficiency Division, International Energy Agency(IEA), greeted all the participants in the 8th EMAK Workshop through a taped VTR
message. He introduced the Energy Efficiency Division of the IEA, which wasestablished over a year ago, in recognition of increasing focus and importance of EE&C.
He mentioned the increasing EE&C activities done by governments as a way tocontribute to economic energy growth. He emphasised that EE&C has more potential
and must be part of energy policy in every country. He stated that energy management
has a very important role in the industry and commercial sectors which implement ISO50001 as well as improvement in new technologies and dissemination of best practices.
This workshop is important to share the stories of energy management as well as
sharing knowledge and experience in the deployment of energy management
measures. It is a good opportunity for AMS to learn from each other, he stated. Finally,
he mentioned that IEA is willing to support the EE&C improvement in the AMS andwished everyone a successful workshop.
Mr. Benoit Lebot-International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation
Mr. Benoit Lebot, Executive Director, IPEEC Secretariat, International Partnership for
Energy Efficiency Cooperation, welcomed all the participants to the 8th EMAK Workshop
through a taped VTR message. He mentioned that EMAK is one of the oldest task
groups under IPEEC. He highlighted the importance, achievement and potentials of
promoting energy management best practices in the industry and commercial sectors.
Finally, he wished everyone a productive workshop with a focus on exchange of
information between Japan and Indonesia.

Session 1: Energy Management Best Practices (Commercial Sector)
Panasonic- Best practice from Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award
Mr. Takamitsu Yasukouchi, General Manager, Intelligence & Liaison Department
Panasonic Corporation presented the topic on “Challenge 50” Energy-Saving Initiative inPanasonic Tokyo Shiodome Building.
The presentation highlighted the following items:
 Panasonic was established in 1918 by Konosuke Matsushita;

10 Panasonic has four (4) companies, namely: i) Eco Solutions Company, ii) Appliances
Company, iii) AVC Networks Company, and iv) Automotive & Industrial Systems
Company; Eco Solutions Company focused on energy related products like solar, battery,
BEMS/HEMS, lighting, housing system; Panasonic Tokyo Shiodome Building implemented advanced energy saving
technologies in electricity, heat and water; Building Energy Management System (BEMS) was applied for monitoring and control
every system for continuing saving every year; Energy-saving Special Committee will conduct once/month to follow up; and Panasonic Tokyo Shiodome Building Awarded Tokyo Metropolitan Semi Top level in2010 & 15 and Awarded the METI Minister Award from ECCJ in 2016 and target
energy-saving 50% toward 2018.
Mie University- Best practice from Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award
Prof. Masaaki Bannai, Professor Emeritus at Mie University presented “Realisation of
Sustainable Energy by Smart Campus”.
The presentation highlighted the following items:
 Objective of Smart Campus: Be Proud of Environmentally Advanced University to theWorld;
 Proposal of Smart Community: i) utilization of sustainable energy (solar and/or wind
power), and high efficient co-generation, ii) CO2 reduction emitted from
Institute/University, iii) stable energy supply under normal condition andindependent power supply in case of a natural disaster; and Individual Measures and Effectiveness, such as: i) decision of various measures, ii)
seasonal electricity demand, iii) electricity demand forecast, and iv) demandcomparison (measured and forecasted).
Apartment Scientia Residence Serpong - Best practice from ASEAN Energy Award
Dr. Budi Utomo, Residences Manager, Apartment Scientia Residences Serpong
presented “Implementation of Energy Management in Residential Building”.
The presentation highlighted the following items:
 Apartement Scientia Residences won the ASEAN Best Practices Awards for Energy
Management in Buildings and Industries in Small and Medium Building Category; The benefit of energy efficiency such as: i) lower operational cost, ii) lower service
charge, iii) reduce CO2 emission, iv) increase customer satisfaction index, v) increase
investment, and vi) enhance brand image; The building management used ISO 50001 as their basic standard to implement
energy management system with its notable principle: Plan-Do-Check-Action; The energy management campaign implemented by: i) using parking stairs instead ofelevator, ii) lighting retrofit, iii) AC refrigerant retrofit, and iv) recycled water; and Energy Management Committee Meeting Session to follow up the result.
Under this session, there were active discussions on many interesting topics related to bestpractices, including the fine tuning methodologies, measures to promote and invest in
11

energy efficiency and conservation measures and how to get the support of networks ofpeople and organisations to promote EE&C. Participants inquired about the effects of EE&C
measures after they were implemented and adopted in the building and industry sectors.
Another interesting feature of the session was discussion on specific technologies such as air
conditioners, lighting, BEMS, control systems, etc., including their investment andperformance as well as their corresponding impact on energy consumption, energy savingsand employees’ productivity.

Session 2: Energy Management Best Practices (Industrial Sectors)
F-TECH INC. - Best practice from Energy Management Leadership Award
Ms. Keiko Kurosawa, Coordinator, Quality Assurance Department of F-TECH INC..
presented “From Japan to the World! Energy Management Evolution by Utilizing Group
Common EnMS”.
The presentation highlighted the following items:
 F-TECH INC.. was established on July 1, 1947 with business content: development,
production and sales of automobile parts, and tooling and equipment associatedwith them; F-TECH INC.. is a company of Honda Group; The energy conservation activities were started in 2008 with the concept ofenvironment global deployment and the road map toward 2020 to be environment
frontrunner;
 F-TECH INC.. published Global F-tech Energy Management System, a common
document for energy management system for F-tech group consisting of manuals,
standards, guidelines and formats, etc.;
 The key of the achievement of ISO50001 is energy review or energy saving diagnosis
consisting of 7 steps as follows: i) identification of energy source, ii) energy diagnosis
plans, iii) start-up meeting, data collection, iv) plan to measure energy, v) site audit,vi) Analysis Energy diagnosis report, and vii) completion Meeting; and In 2016, F-TECH INC.. won Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM) Energy Management
Leadership Awards. CEM is global forum that consists of 23 major countries andregion of the world. This forum is aim at promotion of clean energy.
PT Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper - Best practice from Energy Management Leadership Award
Mr. Kholisul Fatikhin, Director, PT. Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Tbk, presented ‘‘Best
Practice from Energy Management Leadership Award of PT IKPP Tangerang Mill”.
The presentation highlighted the following items:
 PT IKPP Tangerang was founded 1976 and began to produce color paper in 1996 andsuccessful produce 100% colour paper in 2006 with 3 main products: i) color paper,ii) fancy color paper and iii) stationery paper; PT IKPP started to implement ISO 50001 in 2012 and was certificated in November
2013; The energy management in PT IKPP started with management commitment of: i)
Continual improvement in energy performance, ii) Ensuring the availability of12

information and of necessary resources to achieve objectives and targets, iii)
Complying with applicable legal requirements and other requirements, iv) Supports
for the purchase of energy efficient products and services and design for energy
performance improvement, v) Providing the framework for setting and reviewing
energy objectives and targets, and vi) Conducting energy review periodically; The energy management systems were applied in following areas: i) daily operation
control, ii) Steam System Optimization, iii) auto stop motor trim blower, vi) replace
V-belt with timing belt, v) upgrade line shaft to sectional drive, vi) energy monitoring
system, and vii) employee involvement; and As the result, PT IKPP was able to reduce energy intensity by 15.2% in 2015 based on
2011.
PT Petrokimia Gresik - Best practice from ASEAN Energy Award
Ms. Anis Ernani, General Manager of Technology, PT. Petrokimia Gresik, presented Best
Practice Energy Management PT. Petrokimia Gresik.
The presentation highlighted the following items:
 PKG is a State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) under the Pupuk Indonesia Holding
Company (PIHC); PKG is a complete fertilizer plants in Indonesia who work in the field of production offertilizers, chemicals, and services; and The major annual energy sources at PKG come from natural gas at 84.41% and coalat 14.7%.
The energy management system started when top level management made acommitment to energy policy and appointed an energy manager for the organisation
structure in 2010.
 Energy Conservation in PKG include: Energy Conservations in Plant, Buildings andOffices For Energy Conservations in Plant two conservation areas are as follows: a) Using
alternative fuels (Coal, Renewable Energy, etc.) and b) Optimization of Process andEquipment Efficiencies, and reduce Energy Loss For Energy Conservation in Buildings and Offices by: a) replacing TL lamp type with
LED/TSL type which gained energy saving up to 10%, b) conducting energy saving
campaign.
In Session 2, discussions were more focused on specific technologies that provided greater
energy savings and reduction in energy consumption. There were also elaborations on ISO
50001 – its requirements and effectiveness in industries. The Indonesian representatives
elaborated on the Government’s plans and targets for energy emission reduction from theperspective of the energy sector. Suggestions on the improvement of energy management
systems were noted in the discussion.

13

Session 3: Discussion on Knowledge to be shared amongst Energy
Management Award Programs
ASEAN Energy Award
Mr. Rio Jon Piter Silitonga, Technical Officer for ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy
Cooperation presented the recognition award on energy management system in thebuilding and industrial sectors under the category of ASEAN Energy Award.
The presentation highlighted the following items:
 The background of the Award as Southeast Asia’s highest reward for excellence inthe field of energy efficiency; The Award aims to promote awareness on EE&C in buildings and to greater
participation in EE&C best practices in the field of the private sector;
 The Guidelines for each categories were developed by the ASEAN Board of Judges
and ACE; and The numbers of entries and awardees have been constantly increasing over the past
17 years. As of 2016, there were 542 applicants in the competition in which 301 wereawarded.
The ASEAN Energy Award has started since 2000. The first area was Best Practices inEnergy Efficient Buildings (EEB) since buildings were the most energy intensive area ofurban development. The competition initially included two (2) categories, namely: a)
new and existing buildings and b) retrofitted buildings. Then, in 2002, the tropicalbuilding and special submission categories were added. In this program, entries ofbuilding and industry sectors from 10 AMS are applied through ACE channel, andselection of winners were made by the Board of Judges consisting of government
officials and expert representatives to culminate with awarding ceremonies during the
Gala and Official Dinner of the ASEAN Ministers of Energy Meeting (AMEM).
Indonesia National Energy Award
Ms. Gita Lestari, Deputy Director, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR),
presented National Energy Award (PEEN)
The presentation highlighted the following items:
 The objectives of the Award, namely: i) to promote best practice in implementing
energy efficiency and conservation; ii) to promote energy saving by energy user inbuilding, industry, and public sector; and iii) to increase the number of applied cases
to ASEAN Energy Award; Categories of PEEN are Energy Efficient Buildings, Energy Management in Industry
and Building sectors and Energy and Water Saving in Government Institution;
 PEEN selection criteria for each category and assessment process are in accordancewith the criteria and assessment process of ASEAN Energy Award in the case of
Category A and B, however criteria and assessment of PEEN Category C is inaccordance with the Presidential Instruction No. 13 / 2011 on Saving Energy andWater; and Lessons learned are: i) Engagement with association is important to increase thenumber of participants and to disseminate PEEN and energy efficiency; and ii) Using
14

media socialization (newspaper, website, video, brochure, leaflet, banner, twitter,face book, etc.) to disseminate PEEN is effective to increase the number ofparticipants.
Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award – Japan
Mr. Akira Ishihara, International Cooperation Division, The Energy Conservation Center,
Japan presented the Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award –Japan.
The presentation highlighted the following items: Overview of Japanese Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award; Significance of Japanese Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award (Simultaneous
realisation of capacity building and raising awareness); Raising awareness - Practices are “rich in valuable information" (according to thelevel of “awareness” of the user); Capacity building - Educational effect of data and know-how accumulated; Key to Success of Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award, such as: brand value (PReffect of logo, place for study, name recognition, applicability in the world) andtrustworthiness fostered through elaborate examination (composition of committee,
selection process);
In his summary, he highlighted the following points:
 Source of trustworthiness, such as: fair evaluation process, sufficient evaluation fortechnical values, public nature due to the public body’s involvement and PR effect of
information;
 Features of significance established on trustworthiness of Energy Conservation
Grand Prize Award, such as: brand values, informational values, promotion of energy
conservation activities & dissemination of the cases and contribution to energy
conservation capacity building; and Ultimate effect of trustworthiness and achievements in the past, such as:
contribution to form and develop the domains for energy conservation activities andenergy conservation technologies and contribution to promote international EE&C
activities.
Energy Management Leadership Award
Mr. Akira Ishihara, International Cooperation Division, the Energy Conservation Center,
Japan presented the Energy Management Leadership Award.
The presentation highlighted the following items:
 Background of the Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM) as a high-level global government
forum focused on accelerating the transition to a global clean energy economy; The CEM is focused on three global climate and energy policy objectives: Increaseenergy efficiency worldwide, Expand clean energy supply, Enhance clean energy
access; Energy Management Working Group (EMWG) Fora to leverage the extensive
expertise of its member governments to accelerate the adoption and use of energy
management systems such as ISO 50001 in industry and in commercial buildings
worldwide; and15 The Award categories consist of 3 categories, namely: CEM Award of Excellence inEnergy Management, National Energy Management Awards and Energy
Management insights Award. He also shared the participants how to apply theaward, selection process and related committee.
TOP TENs Program
Mr. Yasushi Tanaka presented The Top Ten Energy Efficiency Best Practices and Best
Available Technologies Task Group (TOP TENs).
The presentation highlighted the following items: Overview of the award, the best available energy efficiency technologies andpractices in use by businesses today in participating countries; Task group members do so by developing two types of lists: Top Ten Best Available
Technologies (BAT) and Top Ten Best Practices (BP); Objectives of the BATs and BPs lists are to show to businesses and policy makers thepractical and scalable energy savings solutions currently available and to support theaccelerated uptake of innovative energy saving solutions; The TOP TENs contents: The BAT and BP lists feature leading energy savings
approaches and include information and case studies on the technology or practice,
and where and how they are used. Examples of technological solutions highlighted in
the inaugural lists include co-generation, use of heat pumps and recovery ofindustrial waste heat. Practices include ‘just-in-time’ and zero energy office building
activities amongst others; Content of activity, methodology and way forward to cover other sectors, such astransport and public services. Members will select the sector or sectors they would
like to apply and will collaborate on updating the methodologies for each new
sector. The Task Group will also look at developing new International BAT and BP
lists. TOP TENs welcomes new public-private partnerships to enable joint research on
optimizing methodologies, facilitating the dissemination of the TOP TENs lists, andimproving market uptake of BATs and BPs; and Lastly, he shared the membership of the program and mentioned that task groupsecretariat noted ACE’s intention to become a member of the Award system ifallowed.
Q&A and Discussion
This session had productive exchanges of information on award programs for energy
management among national (Indonesian and Japan), regional (ASEAN) and international(IPEEC and CEM) levels. They shared the secret of success of the Awards, such as: a) thevalue of brand; b) sustainable system for applicants; c) application of best practices; d)promotion of Award programs.
For ASEAN Energy Awards, the new category of Green Building was launched in 2014 withthe following objectives: i) to increase the public’s level of awareness of green buildings; ii)
to encourage the efficient utilization of resources; iii) to contribute to global efforts to
reduce CO2 emissions and to promote measures to address climate change resiliency; iv) toenhance eco-friendly supply chain and create a market for green building technologies,
materials and products; v) to build competency of building and real estate professionals and16other stakeholders in the building industry in evaluating and interpreting in the design,
construction and maintenance of green buildings; and vi) to adopt, develop and apply thegreen building principles in the design of the built environment.
The National Energy Efficiency Award (PEEN) of Indonesia provides recognition tocompanies that have demonstrated excellence in energy management, corporate teams
whose implementation of energy efficiency projects have led to substantial improvements
in energy performance, and outstanding energy managers who have demonstrated strong
leadership in driving energy efficiency improvements within their organisation. There arethree categories for the PEEN Awards, namely: A) Excellence in Energy Management; B)
Best Practices; and C) Outstanding Energy Manager of the Year. Ms. Gita emphasized thatparticipation of building and industry sectors as the key success factor of the Award. In that,
she encouraged the building and industry people to participate in the Award and theApplication for the PEEN Awards is open exclusively for sectors, both SMEs and non-SMEs
may apply for the different award categories. She added that category C was added at thelater stage for the purpose of introducing the same movement to the public organisations. It
was noted that even in Japan since there was no coverage of the public organisation in a
separated manner it was quite noteworthy for the future development of Japan’s award
system.
To ensure the adoption of the BATs and BPs, following items were suggested: i) Optimizing
the evaluation criteria & selection procedure; ii) Promoting cooperation between private
and public; iii) Promoting the application of the cases by seminars, etc.; and iv) Introductionof the award programs into many countries.

173. Workshop Survey Insights
Questions are divided into 4 (four) categories, and each category has 2 (two) questions. The
questionnaire sheet is attached as annex to this report.
A total of 29 (twenty-nine) questionnaire/survey sheets were filled in by participants
anonymously. Participants’ profiles are shown in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1. Organisation Profile
3%
4%

Large scale corporate/businessorganisation
Small & medium sizedcorporate/business organisation
Government/regulator body

7%
10%
17%

59%
Professional/industry association
NGO/non-profit organisation

Those who identify themselves as Large Scale Corporate/Business Organisation are classified
as:Figure 2. Large Scale Corporate/Business Organisation
0%
6% 6%
0%

Manufacturing company
Energy supply company
Bank/financing company
ESCO company
other service company
N/A

18%
70%

1. Barriers to promoting the application of award programs
Respondents were asked whether they have ever applied to award programs, and if not,what keeps their businesses from applying to award programs. Out of 29 (twenty-nine)answers, 2 (two) did not respond whether they have applied for an award program or not.

18

Figure 3. Has Your Organisation ever Applied to any
Award Programs?
Yes
No
N/A

7%
48%
45%

Out of the 13 (thirteen) that answered NO, 10 (ten) answered the follow-up question (2-1
‘What are reasons for NOT’).
Question [2-1] allowed multiple answers: a) lack of
information on any award system; b) lack of awareness of any award system; c) lack of
instruction by the management. The multiple answers result in a total of 14 answers asshown in the chart below.

Figure 4. Barriers to Applying to Award Programs
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

Lack of information

Lack of awarenessLack of intruction

The fact that the majority chose ‘Lack of information’ shows that there is a need to promoteaward programs, and an opportunity to explore the methodologies of such promotion. The
second largest element for this question was the lack of instruction by the managementclass. This implies that the involvement of management and their support is essential for an
organisation’s comprehensive energy management activities.
The following question explored the possibility and intention of participants’ companies ororganisations to apply for an awarding system.

19

Figure 5. Do You Want to Apply for Award Programs?

Yes
No

38%
62%

Out of 11 (eleven) who answered YES to the question ‘do you want to apply for an award?’,
2 (two) wanted to apply for the ASEAN Energy Awards.

2. General Assessment of the 8th EMAK Workshop
Seventeen out of 29 (twenty-nine) gave the’ Very Good’ assessment, while only 1 (one) did
not respond. This result suggests that the workshop was well valued by participants.
Figure 6. Overall Assessment of the Workshop?
0%0%
3%

Excellent10%

Very good
28%

Good
Satisfactory
Poor
59%

N/A

3. Future EMAK Initiatives
Respondents were asked to provide suggestions of ‘useful schemes or tools to gain
information for enhancing energy management in their companies or organisations’. Bothquestions in this category allowed multiple answers, so the total answers for each question
surpassed 29.

20

Figure 7. Useful Informational Tool for Energy Management
25
20
15
10
5
0

Seminar/workshop

WebinarWebsiteBest practicedatabase

N/A

This question received 54 (fifty-four) answers in total. The highest number was for
Seminar/workshop (22), then Best practice database (15), and Website (11). Only 1 (one)person did not answer this question (N/A). This outcome suggests that direct interaction
allowing for experience and knowledge-sharing is more favoured.
For the EMAK website itself, respondents were asked what they would like to see there.
Figure 8. Useful Information Expected to be on EMAK’s Website

As it is also a multiple answer question, the total number of answer for the question ‘What
kind of information would be useful on the EMAK’s website?’ was 109 (one hundred andnine). The highest number was for an Energy management best practice database (22).
One respondent did not answer, and 5 (five) of them checked all the answers.

21

On top of the above results, there were ex post facto comments made by Japanese speakers,
as follows:
F-Tech It was quite a nice chance for us to make a presentation in Indonesia, where our
local factory is based. We would be very happy if our local factory could apply for
the Indonesian Energy Award and or ASEAN Energy Award in the near future.
Panasonic It was very nice to let us have a chance to make a presentation this time. We
were asked by our local staff to mention more about automated and collectiveenergy management system based on BEMS.
Mie University It was quite a meaningful event for us to join the workshop. We are verymuch impressed that the audience seemed to have a big interest on the matter ofinvestment and return on investment related to the energy efficiency oriented
technology and equipment. Therefore we believed there should be much moremention about the cost of investment and return on investment next time.

22

4. Summary of recommendations
Through this report the key recommendations provided by each speaker for ways in which
the Indonesian Government can further enhance its energy management programs havebeen made.
The Indonesian government has made significant progress in energy efficiency improvement
in industry and building mandated by Government Regulation No. 70 (2009), which
stipulated that energy end-users who consume more than 6,000-ton oil equivalent (TOE) of
primary energy supply per year should appoint an energy manager, conduct an energy
audit, and implement energy conservation best practice in industries and buildings. For
users of less than 6,000 TOE, it is voluntary to appoint an energy manager, conduct an audit
and implement the energy conservation. The workshop provided opportunities to learn
from the experiences of other countries and to broaden the network of energy
management practitioners. However, there is still potential to optimize energy efficiency
implementation. Key recommendations to the Indonesian government are as follows:
1. To continue to encourage the building and industry sectors to implement EnMS
through adoption of best practices and award programs. This will provide an important
foundation for progressing energy efficiency policy and targets by enabling andencouraging these sectors to implement energy management concepts in their energy
facilities through awareness-raising and capacity-building, best practice- sharing andaward programs. Sharing best practices, fine tuning methodologies and techniques andother various approaches can support policy making. Moreover, success stories can help
countries accelerate energy efficiency improvement and learn from international
experiences in these areas.
2. There should be a continued focus on the multiple benefits of energy efficiency tomotivate the building and industry sectors to take actions and to maximise businessoutcomes and growth. The introduction of practical approaches and technologies areproven ways to improve building and industrial energy efficiency. It requires greater
involvement and partnership among stakeholders to achieve successful policies andprograms. The EMAK Workshop is an effective platform for bridging the gap among
stakeholders through exchange of ideas and views to find solutions and steps forward
for energy efficiency development.
3. Recognition through award programs needs to be continuously promoted toencourage the implementation of energy management for buildings and industries.
The national, regional and international award programs are effective platforms toencourage more private sector participation (including SMEs and large industries) toimplement energy efficiency projects with efficient practices and technologies. Throughawards, their efforts on EE&C will be recognised by government and the private sector
at the national, regional and international levels.
4. Some efforts need to be undertaken to sustain the award programs, namely: i) value ofthe brand, such as: global PR effect of the logo, existence of opportunities to learn,publicity and further development; ii) sustainable system for applicants and promoters,such as: evaluation methodology, composition of the examination committee and23evaluation process; iii) application of best practices, such as: how to support thedissemination of energy management best practices (e.g. Energy Management Systems,
autonomous group activity, advanced technology and/or excellent know-how); iv)
promotion of award programs, such as: how to raise motivation to participate in thecompetition, promotion tool (e.g. award ceremony, trophy and unique logo), capacitybuilding effect of the process (e.g. presentation event); and v) importance of realising
the objectives related to BATs and BPs, such as: optimising the evaluation criteria andselection procedure, promoting cooperation between private and public sectors, andpromoting the application of the cases through seminar, workshops and other related
events, etc.

24

5. Conclusion
The workshop was successful in progressing energy management implementation throughinformation sharing and the development of policy makers’ and practitioners’ networks.
The positive response of the Indonesian government, the high turnout for the event and thesuggestions from speakers and workshop participants for further awareness-raising andcapacity-building workshops confirm the important role of the EMAK Workshop.
It was envisaged that this initiative could be further enhanced in Indonesia and in the ASEAN
region with strong support of relevant ASEAN energy bodies, taking into accountaspirational targets, strategic action plans and key performance indicators. EMAK canenhance its mission by continuing to work with AMS to assist in energy efficiency strategy
and target under APAEC. Seeing the incremental energy demand trend in the ASEAN region
and in Indonesia, the region is in need of EnMS to address the issue of its growing energy
consumption. This can be achieved by information sharing on best practices andexperiences which can be applied by entities to realise tremendous energy saving potential.

======= End of Document =========

25

ANNEX 1
Energy Management Action Network (EMAK)
Workshop 8
3rd February 2017,09:30~17:40
Jakarta, Indonesia
1. Overview
The ENERGY MANAGEMENT ACTION NETWORK (EMAK) was established in 2009 topromote the improvement of energy efficiency and conservation in industry and commercial
sectors under the International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation (IPEEC). The
primary objective of EMAK is to contribute to accelerated uptake of energy management
practices and systems in industry and commercial sectors through creating platforms forsharing proven and innovative practices and facilitating capacity building. This includes
creating opportunities for networks between policy makers and industry practitioners andestablishing platforms to share best practices on policy frameworks, human resource
development and on state-of-art management systems and practices.
This time, we are to hold the 8th EMAK workshop 2017 in Jakarta, Indonesia 3rd of
February focusing on the theme of recognised energy management best practices andnational/international award programs for best practices. Especially, this time we would liketo focus on how the effect of EE&C efforts and investment are maximized by showing the
success cases. It will be a great opportunity for audience to learn about awarded practices
as case studies and also how they are evaluated in respective award programs. Discussion
session will be provided to facilitate exchanging ideas and opinions among audience andspeakers for various issues relevant to the theme.
Organised by ECCJ Co-organised by ACE
Sponsored by METI
Supported by IPEEC, EE&C-SSN, DGNREEC-MEMR

2. Agenda of the 8th EMAK Workshop
Date

3rd

Venue

Double Tree by Hilton Hotel Jakarta

MCACE / Ms. Nanda Moenander

February 2017

Time

Activity

Opening
09:30-10:05

09:30-09:35

Opening Remark & Welcome from ECCJ (Mr. Jiro Sogawa)

09:35-09:40

Welcome from ACE (Mr.Christopher Zamora )09:40-09:55

Keynote speech by MEMR (Ms.Gita Lestari)

09:55-10:05

VTR message (IEA, IPEEC)26

10:05-10:20

Coffee BreakSession 1: Energy Management Best Practices (Commercial Sector)
10:20-12:00

10:20-10:50

Best practice from Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award(Panasonic / Mr. Takamitsu Yasukouchi)

10:50-11:20

Best practice from Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award(Mie University / Prof. Masaaki Bannai)

Moderator

11:20-11:50

ACE/Dr.Atit
TippichaiBest practice from ASEAN Energy Award(Apartemen Scientia Residence Serpong / Mr. Budi Utomo)

11:50-12:00

Q&A

12:00-14:00

Lunch BreakSession 2: Energy Management Best Practices (Industrial Sector)
14:00-15:40

14:00-14:30

Best practice from Energy Management Leadership Award(F-Tech / Ms. Keiko Kurosawa)

14:30-15:00
Moderator
MEMR/(PT Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper / Mr. Kholisul Fatikhin)
15:00-15:30

Ms.Andriah
FebyBest practice from Energy Management Leadership Award
Best practice from ASEAN Energy Award(PT Petrokimia Gresik / Ms. Anis Ernani)

15:30-15:40

Q&A

15:40-16:00

Coffee BreakSession 3: Discussion: Knowledge to be shared amongst Energy Management Award
Programs
16:00-17:30

16:00-16:40

Introduction of Award Programs- ASEAN Energy Award (ACE / Mr. Rio Jon Silitonga)- Indonesian Energy Award (MEMR / Ms. Gita Lestari)- Energy Conservation Grand Prize Award(ECCJ / Mr. Akira Ishihara)- Energy Management Leadership Award(ECCJ / Mr. Akira Ishihara)

Moderator
ECCJ/- TOP TENs (ECCJ / Mr. Yasushi Tanaka)
16:40-17:30

Discussion by all speakers

Mr.Yasushi(1) Secret of success

Tanaka(2) Future Development

Closing Session
17:30-17:40
18:00-19:30

Closing remark (METI / Ms. Sayaka Shishido)
Networking Buffet27

ANNEX 2
Participants List
No.

Name

Organisation

Gita Lestari

EBTKE-ESDM

Media Riski Fauziah

EBTKE-ESDM

Wahyu Widya

EBTKE-ESDM

Sayaka SHISHIDOJiro SOGAWA
Akira ISHIHARA
Yasushi TANAKA
Takashi SATO
Naomi HONMA
Takeshi KAWASHIMA
Keiko KUROSAWA
Masaaki BANNAI
Kenichi OHTAKE

Gema Khusnul Fitrika
Tri Sani
I Ketut Harta Mahendra
Eva Pitterling

METI
ECCJ
ECCJ
ECCJ
ECCJ
ECCJ
F-TEC Inc.
F-TEC Inc.
Mie University
President, PT.F.TECHINDONESIA
General Manager, PT.F.TECHINDONESIA
Apartemen Scientia Residence
Serpong
PT Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper
PT Petrokimia Gresik
Green Building Council
Indonesia (GBCI)Green Building Council
Indonesia (GBCI)
Adaro Energy
PT Great Giant Pineapple
PT Great Giant Pineapple
EuroChamJean Baptiste Dreanic

EuroChamEka Wahyuni

EuroCham

26

Wioko Yudhantara

Astra Internasional Tbk

27

Narendra Afian P.
Aris

Astra Internasional Tbk
UNIDO

Nico/ApriUNIDO

Maria-Jose Poddey

GIZ (AGEP)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

28
29
30

Ksao KAWAKAMI
Budi Utomo
Kholisul Fatikhin
Anis Ernani
Siti Ardiningsih Adiwoso
Surendro

28

Type oforganisation
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
MinistrySponsor
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Private sector
Private sector
University
Private sector

Country
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Indonesia

Private sector

Indonesia

Private sector

Indonesia

Private sector
Private sector
Private sector

Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia

Private sector

Indonesia

Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Internationalorganisation
Internationalorganisation
Internationalorganisation
Private sector

Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia

Private sector
Internationalorganisation
Internationalorganisation
Internationalorganisation

Indonesia
Indonesia

Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia

Indonesia
Indonesia

31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69

Intan Cinditiara

GIZ (AGEP)

Anant Shukla

GIZ (AGEP)

Hanna Yolanda

GIZ (AGEP)

NanangIkhsanAmir
Asep Suwarna

PT Amerta Indah Otsuka
PT Amerta Indah Otsuka
PT Amerta Indah Otsuka
USAID ICED

Hanny J. Berchmans

USAID ICED

Aldo
Rudi
Kai Berndt

KMK Global SportKMK Global SportGIZ (Green Chiller)

Eva Wahyuningsih

GIZ (Green Chiller)

Getruida H. Hardjowijono

GIZ (Green Chiller)

Junianto

GIZ (Green Chiller)

Christopher Zamora
Badariah Yosiyana
Rio Jon Piter Silitonga
Atchariya Jangchay
Mutia Asriyani
Nanda Febriani Moenandar
Adiskiya Rinintasari
Randy Wynston Kaseger
Aloysius Damar Pranadi
Dr. Ing- Kusnanto
R. Anton Purwakusumah
Dedy Setiawan
Muslina Handayani
Anggara NSP
Sutriyono
Priyono B.S
Lucky Ginanjar
Mr. Kiyoshi Izawa
Hery SusantoPrima Ardhi Susatya
Januar Gurning
Abdullah Afian
Muhammad Taufiq H
Akhmad Unggul

ACE
ACE
ACE
ACE
ACE
ACE
ACE
ACE
ACE
ACE
Star Energy GeothermalStar Energy Geothermal
PERSI
PT. Gajah Tunggal
PT. Gajah Tunggal
PT. Gajah Tunggal
PT. Gajah Tunggal
NEWJEC Inc. Jakarta Office
PT. Chiang Luh Indonesia
PT. Unilever Indonesia, TBK
Panasonic Indonesia
Panasonic Indonesia
PT Pembangkitan Jawa Bali
Lintas EBTKE-ESDM

Dedi Suntoro

P3TK EBTKE-ESDM

29

Internationalorganisation
Internationalorganisation
Internationalorganisation
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Internationalorganisation
Internationalorganisation
Private sector
Private sector
Internationalorganisation
Internationalorganisation
Internationalorganisation
Internationalorganisation
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Co-organiser
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
Ministry

Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia

70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81

Khalif Ahadi

P3TK EBTKE-ESDM

Santosa Adibwibawa
Anton Wahjusoedibjo
Filius Y
Yusman Arullah
Ridho Yasser

Luna Mutiara

PT Phapros
PT Pranata Energi Nusantara
PT Pusri Palembang
PT Pusri Palembang
Coordinating Ministry for
Maritime Affairs
Coordinating Ministry for
Maritime Affairs
Lintas EBTKE-ESDM

Nina K. S

P3TK EBTKE-ESDM

MulyaniCommunication Bureau, ESDM

Arienaldi

Communication Bureau, ESDM

Muhammad Ircham
Jon Respati

Agus Suyoto
Catur Wahyu

Asosiasi Semen Indonesia
Indonesia Energy
Conservation and Efficiency
Society
Indonesia Energy
Conservation and Efficiency
Society
Summarecon
ESDM

Agung Feinnudin

ESDM

Andriani

ESDM

Awal Royadi

ESDM

Krist Astuti

Consultant ADB

Wioko Yudhantara

PT Astra International

Dani Supratman

82
Rana
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90

30

Indonesian
Ministry
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Private sector
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
Ministry
Private sector
Civil society
organisation

Indonesia

Civil society
organisation

Indonesia

Private sector
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
Ministry
Indonesian
Ministry
Internationalorganisation
Private sector

Indonesia
Indonesia

Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia

Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia

ANNEX 3
THE 8TH WORKHSOP FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT ACTION NETWORK EVALUATION FORM
EMAK 2017 (Jakarta, Indonesia) on 3rd February 2017

Dear Participant,Thank you very much for joining 8th EMAK workshop. We would be most grateful if you could answer
following questions. Please check the most appropriate box.

EVALUATION FORM
I. YOUR ORGANISATION PROFILE
1. Your organisation is classified as a…
(a) Large scaled Corporate/business organisation(b) Small and medium sized Corporate/business organisation(c) Government/regulatory body(d) Professional/industry association(e) NGO/non-profit organisation(f) Educational/academic institution(g) Others

2. If you are from a large scaled Corporate/business organisation, which sub-sector does yourorganisation belong to?
(a) Manufacturing company(d) ESCO company(b) Energy supply company(e) Other Service company(c) Bank/Financing company

II. ENERGY MANAGEMENT STATUS IN YOUR ORGANISATION
1. Has your organisation ever applied to awarding system (Indonesian Energy Award, ASEAN
Energy Award, USA Energy Management Leadership, and Top-Ten)?
Yes

No

31

Do not know

2. If you choose “No” or “Do not know” on above question,
2-1 What are reasons for NOT (multiple answers allowed)
Organisation isalready energy
efficient

Organisation has inhouse energy
management expert

Lack of money

Lack ofinformation onenergy efficiency

Lack of awarenessof energy efficiency

2-2 Do you want to apply Awarding system in Future?
Yes, Which Awarding system do you like to apply?

III. GENERAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE EMAK WORKSHOP
1. What is your overall assessment of this event?
Excellent

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Poor

2. Which presentations were of most interest to and/or relevant to your organisation? (multiple
answers allowed)
USA

Australia

Japan

China

Indonesia

Panel
Discussion

IV. EMAK FUTURE ACTION
1. What are useful schemes or tools to gain information for enhancing energy management inyour organisation? (multiple answers allowed)
Seminar/Workshop

Web-seminar

Portal site(website)

Best Practice Data base

2. What kind of information would be useful on the EMAK website? (multiple answers allowed)
EnergyManagement guideline
and manuals

EnergyManagement Bestpractice
data baseEnergyManagement onlinediagnosis

EnergyManagement policy andmeasures inforeigncountries

EnergyManagement experts'
name list

EnergyManagement Event
calendarThank you for taking the time to fill out this questionnaire.
Please kindly return it before the end of the conference.
32

EnergyManagement Academic
Papers