INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON NON‐IONIZING RADIATION PROTECTIONICNIRP GUIDELINESFOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO TIME‐VARYING
ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS (1 HZ – 100 kHZ)

PUBLISHED IN: HEALTH PHYSICS 99(6):818‐836; 2010

ICNIRP PUBLICATION – 2010

ICNIRP Guidelines

GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO TIME-VARYING
ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS (1 Hz TO 100 kHz)International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection*
INTRODUCTION

with a conducting object where the electric potential of theobject is different from that of the body. Results of laboratory and epidemiological studies, basic exposure assessment
criteria, and reference levels for practical hazard assessment
are discussed, and the guidelines presented here are applicable to both occupational and public exposure.
The restrictions in these guidelines were based on
established evidence regarding acute effects; currently
available knowledge indicates that adherence to these restrictions protect workers and members of the public fromadverse health effects from exposure to low frequency
EMF. The epidemiological and biological data concerning
chronic conditions were carefully reviewed and it was
concluded that there is no compelling evidence that they arecausally related to low-frequency EMF exposure.
These guidelines do not address product performance standards, which are intended to limit EMF
emissions from specific devices under specified test
conditions, nor does the document deal with the techniques used to measure any of the physical quantities thatcharacterize electric, magnetic and electromagnetic
fields. Comprehensive descriptions of instrumentationand measurement techniques for accurately determining
such physical quantities may be found elsewhere (IEC
2004, 2005a; IEEE 1994, 2008).
Compliance with the present guidelines may not necessarily preclude interference with, or effects on, medical
devices such as metallic prostheses, cardiac pacemakers andimplanted defibrillators and cochlear implants. Interferencewith pacemakers may occur at levels below the recommended reference levels. Advice on avoiding these problems is beyond the scope of the present document but isavailable elsewhere (IEC 2005b).
These guidelines will be periodically revised andupdated as advances are made in the scientific knowledge
concerning any aspect relevant for limiting exposure of low
frequency time-varying electric and magnetic fields.

IN THIS document, guidelines are established for the protection of humans exposed to electric and magnetic fields inthe low-frequency range of the electromagnetic spectrum.
The general principles for the development of ICNIRP
guidelines are published elsewhere (ICNIRP 2002). For the
purpose of this document, the low-frequency range extends
from 1 Hz to 100 kHz. Above 100 kHz, effects such asheating need to be considered, which are covered by other
ICNIRP guidelines. However, in the frequency range from100 kHz up to approximately 10 MHz protection from both,
low frequency effects on the nervous system as well as highfrequency effects need to be considered depending on
exposure conditions. Therefore, some guidance in thisdocument is extended to 10 MHz to cover the nervous
system effects in this frequency range. Guidelines forstatic magnetic fields have been issued in a separate
document (ICNIRP 2009). Guidelines applicable tomovement-induced electric fields or time-varying magnetic fields up to 1 Hz will be published separately.
This publication replaces the low-frequency part ofthe 1998 guidelines (ICNIRP 1998). ICNIRP is currently
revising the guidelines for the high-frequency portion of
the spectrum (above 100 kHz).
SCOPE AND PURPOSE
The main objective of this publication is to establish
guidelines for limiting exposure to electric and magnetic
fields (EMF) that will provide protection against all
established adverse health effects.
Studies on both direct and indirect effects of EMF havebeen assessed: direct effects result from direct interactionsof fields with the body; indirect effects involve interactions* ICNIRP Secretariat, c/o Gunde Ziegelberger, c/o Bundesamt für
Strahlenschutz, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Oberschleissheim,
Germany.
For correspondence or reprints contact info@icnirp.org.
(Manuscript accepted 15 June 2010)

QUANTITIES AND UNITS

0017-9078/10/0
Copyright © 2010 Health Physics Society

Whereas electric fields are associated only with thepresence of electric charge, magnetic fields are the result

DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f06c86
818

Limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields ● ICNIRPof the physical movement of electric charge (electric
current). An electric field, E, exerts a force on an electriccharge and is expressed in volts per meter (V m⫺1).
Similarly, magnetic fields can exert physical forces onelectric charges, if such charges are in motion and/or themagnetic field varies with time. Electric and magnetic
fields have both magnitude and direction (i.e., they arevectors). A magnetic field can be specified in twoways—as magnetic flux density, B, expressed in tesla(T), or as magnetic field strength, H, expressed in ampere
per meter (A m⫺1). The two quantities are related by theexpression:

B ⫽ ␮H(1)

where ␮ is the constant of proportionality (the magnetic
permeability); in vacuum and air, as well as in nonmagnetic (including biological) materials, ␮ has thevalue 4␲ ⫻ 10⫺7 when expressed in Henry per meter (Hm⫺1). Thus, in describing a magnetic field for protection
purposes, only one of the quantities B or H needs to be
specified.
Exposure to time-varying EMF results in internal
electric fields and in body currents and energy absorption
in tissues that depend on the coupling mechanisms andthe frequency involved. The internal electric field Ei andcurrent density J are related by Ohm’s Law:

J ⫽ ␴E i(2)where ␴ is the electrical conductivity of the medium. The
dosimetric quantities used in these guidelines are as
follows:● electric field Ei; and● Current I.

A general summary of EMF and dosimetric quantities andunits used in these guidelines is provided in Table 1.
SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE
These guidelines for limiting exposure have beendeveloped following a thorough review of the published

Table 1. Quantities and corresponding SI units used inthese guidelines.
Quantity

SymbolUnit

Conductivity
Current
Current density
Frequency
Electric field strength
Magnetic field strength
Magnetic flux density
Magnetic permeability
Permittivity

␴
I
J
f
E
H
B
␮
␧

Siemens per meter (S m⫺1)
Ampere (A)Ampere per square meter (A m⫺2)
Hertz (Hz)Volt per meter (V m⫺1)
Ampere per meter (A m⫺1)
Tesla (T)Henry per meter (H m⫺1)
Farad per meter (F m⫺1)

819

scientific literature. Well established criteria were used toevaluate the scientific validity of the methodology, results and conclusions of reported findings. Only effects
for which there was reliable scientific evidence wereused as the basis for the exposure restrictions.
Biological effects of exposure to low frequency
electromagnetic fields have been reviewed by theInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),ICNIRP, and the World Health Organization (WHO)(IARC 2002; ICNIRP 2003a; WHO 2007a) and national expert groups. Those publications provided thescientific basis for these guidelines.
As detailed below, the basis for the guidelines is
two-fold: Exposure to low-frequency electric fields may
cause well-defined biological responses, ranging fromperception to annoyance, through surface electric-charge
effects. In addition, the only well established effects involunteers exposed to low frequency magnetic fields are
the stimulation of central and peripheral nervous tissues
and the induction in the retina of phosphenes, a perception of faint flickering light in the periphery of the visual
field. The retina is part of the CNS and is regarded as an
appropriate, albeit conservative, model for induced electric field effects on CNS neuronal circuitry in general.
In view of the uncertainty inherent in the scientificdata, reduction factors have been applied in establishing
the exposure guidelines. For details see ICNIRP 2002.
Coupling mechanisms between fields and the body
Human and animal bodies significantly perturb the
spatial distribution of a low frequency electric field. At
low frequencies, the body is a good conductor, and theperturbed field lines external to the body are nearly
perpendicular to the body surface. Oscillating charges are
induced on the surface of the exposed body and theseproduce currents inside the body. Key features of dosimetry for exposure of humans to low frequency electricfields include:● the electric field induced inside the body is consider-ably smaller than the external electric field, e.g., five to
six orders of magnitude at 50 – 60 Hz;● for a given external electric field, the strongest fields
are induced when the human body is in perfect contact
with the ground through the feet (electricallygrounded), and the weakest induced fields are for the
body insulated from the ground (in “free space”);● the total current flowing in a body in perfect contact
with ground is determined by the body size and shape(including posture) rather than tissue conductivity;● the distribution of induced currents across the variousorgans and tissues is determined by the conductivity of
those tissues; and820

Health Physics● there is also an indirect effect, where the current in the

body is produced by contact with a conductive object
located in an electric field.
For magnetic fields, the permeability of tissue is thesame as that of air, so the field in tissue is the same as theexternal field. Human and animal bodies do not significantly perturb the field. The main interaction of magnetic
fields is the Faraday induction of electric fields andassociated currents in the tissues. Electric fields may also
be induced by movement in a static magnetic field. Keyfeatures of dosimetry for exposure of humans to low
frequency magnetic fields include:● for a given magnetic field strength and orientation,higher electric fields are induced in the bodies of larger
people because the possible conduction loops arelarger;● the induced electric field and current depend on theorientation of the external magnetic field to the body.
Generally induced fields in the body are greatest when
the field is aligned from the front to the back of thebody, but for some organs the highest values are fordifferent field alignments;● the weakest electric fields are induced by a magnetic
field oriented along the principal body axis; and● the distribution of the induced electric field is affectedby the conductivity of the various organs and tissues.
Conclusions from the current scientific literature
Neurobehavior. Exposure to low-frequency electricfields causes well-defined biological responses, ranging
from perception to annoyance, through surface electriccharge effects (Reilly 1998, 1999). Thresholds for directperception by the most sensitive 10% of volunteers at
50 – 60 Hz ranged between 2 and 5 kV m⫺1 and 5% found
15–20 kV m⫺1 annoying. The spark discharge from aperson to ground is found to be painful to 7% ofvolunteers in a field of 5 kV m⫺1, whereas it would be
painful to about 50% in a 10 kV m⫺1 field. Thresholds forthe spark discharge from a charged object through agrounded person depend on the size of the object andtherefore require individual assessment.
The responsiveness of electrically excitable nerve
and muscle tissue to electric stimuli including thoseinduced by exposure to low-frequency EMFs has been
well established for many years (e.g., Reilly 2002;
Saunders and Jefferys 2007). Myelinated nerve fibers of
the human peripheral nervous system have been estimated to have a minimum threshold value of around 6
Vpeak m⫺1 (Reilly 1998, 2002), based on theoretical
calculation using a nerve model. However, peripheral
nerve stimulation induced during volunteer exposure to

December 2010, Volume 99, Number 6

the switched gradient magnetic fields of magnetic resonance (MR) systems suggested that the threshold forperception may be as low as about 2 V m⫺1 (Nyenhuis etal. 2001), based on calculations using a homogeneoushuman phantom model. A more accurate calculation of
the electric fields induced in the tissues of a heterogeneous human model based on data from the above MR
study has been carried out by So et al. (2004). Theseauthors estimated the minimum threshold for peripheral
nerve stimulation of between about 4 – 6 V m⫺1, based on
the assumption that stimulation took place in the skin or
subcutaneous fat. With stronger stimuli, discomfort andthen pain ensue; the lowest percentile for intolerable
stimulation is approximately 20% above the medianthreshold for perception (ICNIRP 2004). Myelinatednerve fibers of the central nervous system (CNS) can be
stimulated by electric fields induced during transcranial
magnetic stimulation (TMS); the pulsed fields induced incortical tissue during TMS are quite high (⬎100 Vm⫺1peak), although theoretical calculation suggests thatminimum stimulation threshold values may be as low as⬃10 V m⫺1peak (Reilly 1998, 2002). For both sets ofnerves, thresholds rise above around 1–3 kHz due to theprogressively shorter time available for the accumulationof electric charge on the nerve membrane and below
about 10 Hz due to the accommodation of a nerve to aslowly depolarizing stimulus.†
Muscle cells are in general less sensitive to direct
stimulation than nerve tissue (Reilly 1998). Cardiac
muscle tissue deserves particular attention because aberrant function is potentially life-threatening: however,ventricular fibrillation thresholds exceed those for cardiac muscle stimulation by a factor of 50 or more (Reilly2002), although this drops considerably if the heart isrepeatedly excited during the vulnerable period of the
cardiac cycle. Thresholds rise above about 120 Hz due tothe much longer time-constant of muscle fibers compared with myelinated nerves.
The most robustly established effect of electricfields below the threshold for direct nerve or muscle
excitation is the induction of magnetic phosphenes, theperception of faint flickering light in the periphery of thevisual field, in the retinas of volunteers exposed to low
frequency magnetic fields. The minimum threshold flux
density is around 5 mT at 20 Hz, rising at higher andlower frequencies. In these studies, the phosphenes arethought to result from the interaction of the induced
electric field with electrically excitable cells in the retina.
This is formed as an outgrowth of the forebrain and can†
Accommodation does not occur for example in response to thelow-frequency component of trapezoid or rectangular pulses withquick rise-times but low repetition frequencies such as those found in
the switched gradient fields of MR systems.

Limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields ● ICNIRP

be considered a good but conservative model of processes that occur in CNS tissue in general (Attwell 2003).
The threshold for induced electric field strengths in theretina has been estimated to lie between about 50 and 100
mV m⫺1 at 20 Hz, rising at higher and lower frequencies(Saunders and Jefferys 2007) although there is considerable uncertainty attached to these values.
The integrative properties of the nervous tissue of
the CNS may render it, and therefore functions such as
cognitive processes like memory, sensitive to the effectsof these physiologically weak electric fields. Saunders
and Jefferys (2002) suggested that the electrical polarization of neurons in the CNS by such weak electricfields might enhance the synchronization of active
groups of neurons and affect the recruitment of adjacentnon-active neurons, thereby influencing overall nerve
cell excitability and activity. In vitro evidence fromstudies using brain slices suggests that minimum thresholds for these effects lie below frequencies of ⬃100 Hz
and may be as low as 100 mV m⫺1 (Saunders andJefferys 2007).
Two research groups have investigated the effects of
weak electric fields applied directly to the head via
electrodes‡ on brain electrical activity and function inhumans. One group (Kanai et al. 2008) reported that
stimulation of the visual cortex induced the perception ofcortical phosphenes (similar in appearance to phosphenes
induced in the retina) when the stimulus frequency wascharacteristic for visual cortical activity either in dark
conditions (around 10 Hz) or in light conditions (around
20 Hz) but not at higher or lower frequencies. The othergroup (Pogosyan et al. 2009) applied a 20 Hz signal tothe motor cortex of volunteers during the performance ofa visuo-motor task and found a small but statisticallysignificant slowing of hand movement during task performance, which was consistent with an increased synchronization of 20 Hz motor cortex activity. No effectwas seen at a lower stimulus frequency. In summary,both groups of authors found that 10 –20 Hz electricfields, above the threshold for retinal phosphenes, caninteract with ongoing rhythmic electrical activity in thevisual and motor cortices and slightly affect visual
processing and motor co-ordination, carrying the implication that 10 –20 Hz EMF-induced electric fields ofsufficient magnitude may have similar effects.
However, the evidence for other neurobehavioral
effects on brain electrical activity, cognition, sleep, andmood in volunteers exposed to low frequency EMFs ismuch less clear (Cook et al. 2002, 2006; Crasson 2003;
ICNIRP 2003a; Barth et al. 2010). Generally, such‡
Transcranial AC stimulation or tACS is applied at levels below
local skin perception thresholds.

821

studies have been carried out at exposure levels at or
below about 1–2 mT; i.e., below those required to induce
the effects described above, and have produced evidenceof subtle and transitory effects at most. The conditions
necessary to elicit such responses are not well defined atpresent.
Some people claim to be hypersensitive to EMFs ingeneral. However, the evidence from double-blind provocation studies suggests that the reported symptoms areunrelated to EMF exposure (Rubin et al. 2005; WHO2007a).
There is only inconsistent and inconclusive evidence
that exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic
fields causes depressive symptoms or suicide (WHO2007a).
In animals, the possibility that exposure to low
frequency fields may affect neurobehavioral functions
has been explored from a number of perspectives using a
range of exposure conditions. Few effects have been
established. There is convincing evidence that lowfrequency electric fields can be detected by animals,
most likely as a result of surface charge effects, and may
elicit transient arousal or mild stress. Other possible
field-dependent changes are less well defined (WHO2007a).
Thus, the perception of surface electric charge, thedirect stimulation of nerve and muscle tissue and theinduction of retinal phosphenes are well established andcan serve as a basis for guidance. In addition, there is also
indirect scientific evidence that brain functions such as
visual processing and motor co-ordination can be transiently affected by induced electric fields. However, theevidence from other neurobehavioral research in volunteers exposed to low frequency electric and magnetic
fields is not sufficiently reliable to provide a basis forhuman exposure limits.
Neuroendocrine system. The results of volunteer
studies as well as residential and occupational epidemiological studies suggest that the neuroendocrine system
is not adversely affected by exposure to 50 – 60 Hz
electric or magnetic fields. This applies particularly tocirculating levels of specific hormones, including melatonin released by the pineal gland, and to a number ofhormones involved in the control of body metabolism
and physiology released by the pituitary gland. Most
laboratory studies of the effects of 50 – 60 Hz exposureon night-time melatonin levels in volunteers found noeffect when care was taken to control possible confounding (WHO 2007a).
From the large number of animal studies investigating the effects of 50 – 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields
on rat pineal and serum melatonin levels, some reported

822

Health Physics

that exposure resulted in night-time suppression of melatonin, while other studies did not. In seasonally breeding animals, the evidence for an effect of exposure to
50 – 60 Hz fields on melatonin levels and melatonindependent reproductive status is predominantly negative(ICNIRP 2003a; WHO 2007a). No convincing effect on
melatonin levels has been seen in a study of non-humanprimates chronically exposed to 50 – 60 Hz fields.
No consistent effects have been seen in the stressrelated hormones of the pituitary-adrenal axis in a variety
of mammalian species, with the possible exception ofshort-lived stress following the onset of low frequency
electric-field exposure at levels high enough to be perceived (ICNIRP 2003a; WHO 2007a). Similarly, while
few studies have been carried out, mostly negative or
inconsistent effects have been seen in the levels of
growth hormone and hormones involved in controllingmetabolic activity or associated with the control ofreproduction and sexual development.
Overall, these data do not indicate that low frequency electric and/or magnetic fields affect the neuroendocrine system in a way that would have an adverse
impact on human health.
Neurodegenerative disorders. It has been hypothesized that exposure to low frequency fields is associatedwith several neurodegenerative diseases. For Parkinson’s
disease and multiple sclerosis the number of studies has
been small and there is no evidence for an association
between low frequency exposure and these diseases. For
Alzheimer’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis(ALS) more studies have been published. Some of thesereports suggest that people employed in electrical occupations might have an increased risk for ALS (Kheifets etal. 2009). So far, no biological mechanism has been
established which can explain this association, although it
could have arisen because of confounders related to electrical occupations, such as electric shocks. Furthermore, studies using more sophisticated exposure assessment methods,e.g., job-exposure matrices, have generally not observed
increased risks (Kheifets et al. 2009). For Alzheimer’s
disease, results are inconsistent. Strongest associations
have been found in clinic based studies with a large
potential for selection bias, but increased risks have also
been observed in some, but not all, population based
studies. Subgroup analyses within studies strengthen theimpression of inconsistent data (Kheifets et al. 2009).
Statistical heterogeneity between study results speaks
against pooling of available results, although such attempts have been made (Garcia et al. 2008). In addition,
there is some evidence for publication bias. Control ofpotential confounding from other occupational exposures
has generally not been made. So far only one residential

December 2010, Volume 99, Number 6

study is available, indicating an increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease after long-term exposure, but based onvery small numbers of cases (Huss et al. 2009).
The studies investigating the association between
low frequency exposure and Alzheimer’s disease areinconsistent. Overall, the evidence for the association
between low frequency exposure and Alzheimer⬘s disease and ALS is inconclusive.
Cardiovascular disorders. Experimental studies ofboth short-term and long-term exposure indicate that,while electric shock is an obvious health hazard, otherhazardous cardiovascular effects associated with low
frequency fields are unlikely to occur at exposure levels
commonly encountered environmentally or occupationally (WHO 2007a). Though various cardiovascularchanges have been reported in the literature, the majorityof effects are small, and the results have not been
consistent within or between studies (McNamee et al.
2009). Most of the studies of cardiovascular diseasemorbidity and mortality have shown no association with
exposure (Kheifets et al. 2007). Whether a specificassociation exists between exposure and altered autonomic control of the heart remains speculative. Overall,the evidence does not suggest an association between
low frequency exposure and cardiovascular diseases.
Reproduction and development. Overall, epidemiological studies have not shown an association between
human adverse reproductive outcomes and maternal or
paternal exposure to low frequency fields. There is some
limited evidence for increased risk of miscarriage associated with maternal magnetic field exposure, but thisreported association has not been found in other studies
and overall the evidence for such an association is poor.
Exposures to low frequency electric fields of up to
150 kV m⫺1 have been evaluated in several mammalian
species, including studies with large group sizes andexposure over several generations; the results consistently show no adverse developmental effects (ICNIRP
2003a; WHO 2007a).
Low frequency magnetic field exposure of mammals does not result in gross external, visceral or skeletal
malformations using fields up to 20 mT (Juutilainen
2003, 2005; WHO 2007a). Overall, the evidence for an
association between low frequency and developmental
and reproductive effects is very weak.
Cancer. A considerable number of epidemiologicalreports, carried out particularly during the 1980’s and90’s, indicated that long term exposure to 50 – 60 Hz
magnetic fields, orders of magnitude below the limits ofLimiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields ● ICNIRP

the 1998 ICNIRP exposure guidelines might be associated with cancer. While the first studies looked atchildhood cancer in relation to magnetic fields, later
research also investigated adult cancers. In general, theinitially observed associations between 50 – 60 Hz magnetic fields and various cancers were not confirmed instudies designed to see whether the initial findings could
be replicated. However, for childhood leukemia thesituation is different. The research that followed the firststudy has suggested that there may be a weak association
between the higher levels of exposure to residential
50 – 60 Hz magnetic fields and childhood leukemia risk,
although it is unclear whether it is causal: a combinationof selection bias, some degree of confounding andchance could explain the results (WHO 2007a). Twopooled analyses (Ahlbom et al. 2000; Greenland et al.
2000) indicate that an excess risk may exist for average
exposures exceeding 0.3– 0.4 ␮T, although the authors of
those analyses cautioned strongly that their results cannot
be interpreted as showing a causal relationship between
magnetic fields and childhood leukemia.
At the same time, no biophysical mechanism has
been identified and the experimental results from theanimal and cellular laboratory studies do not support thenotion that exposure to 50 – 60 Hz magnetic fields is a
cause of childhood leukemia.
It should be noted that there is currently no adequate
animal model of the most common form of childhood
leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Most studies
report no effect of 50 – 60 Hz magnetic fields on leukemia or lymphoma in rodent models (ICNIRP 2003a;
WHO 2007a). Several large-scale long-term studies inrodents have not shown any consistent increase in any
type of cancer, including hematopoietic, mammary,brain, and skin tumors.
A substantial number of studies have examined theeffects of 50 – 60 Hz magnetic fields on chemicallyinduced mammary tumors in rats (ICNIRP 2003a; WHO2007a). Inconsistent results were obtained that may be
due in whole or in part to differences in experimental
protocols, such as the use of specific sub-strains. Most
studies on the effects of 50 – 60 Hz magnetic field
exposure on chemically-induced or radiation-induced
leukemia/lymphoma models were negative. Studies ofpre-neoplastic liver lesions, chemically-induced skin tumors, and brain tumors reported predominantly negative
results.
Generally, studies of the effects of low frequency
field exposure of cells have shown no induction of
genotoxicity at fields below 50 mT (Crumpton and
Collins 2004; WHO 2007a). Overall, in contrast to theepidemiological evidence of an association between
childhood leukemia and prolonged exposure to power823

frequency magnetic fields, the animal cancer data, particularly those from large-scale lifetime studies, arealmost universally negative. The data from cellularstudies are generally supportive of the animal studies,though more equivocal.
Rationale for these recommended low
frequency guidelines
ICNIRP addresses acute and chronic health effects
and considers recent dosimetric developments in thisguidance.
Acute effects. There are a number of well established acute effects of exposure to low-frequency EMFs
on the nervous system: the direct stimulation of nerve
and muscle tissue and the induction of retinal phosphenes. There is also indirect scientific evidence thatbrain functions such as visual processing and motor
co-ordination can be transiently affected by induced
electric fields. All these effects have thresholds below
which they do not occur and can be avoided by meeting
appropriate basic restrictions on electric fields induced in
the body.
Following the recommendations made concerning
guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields(ICNIRP 2009), ICNIRP considers that there are occupational circumstances where, with appropriate advice
and training, it is reasonable for workers voluntarily andknowingly to experience transient effects such as retinal
phosphenes and possible minor changes in some brain
functions, since they are not believed to result in longterm or pathological health effects. Exposure of all partsof the body in these circumstances should be limited inorder to avoid peripheral and central myelinated nerve
stimulation. ICNIRP notes the relatively narrow margin
between peripheral nerve perception and pain thresholds;
see above. For both types of nerves, thresholds rise abovearound 1–3 kHz due to the very short membrane timeconstants resulting from myelination, and below about 10
Hz due to the accommodation to a slowly depolarizing
stimulus.
Avoiding retinal phosphenes should protect against
any possible effects on brain function. Phosphene thresholds are a minimum around 20 Hz and rise rapidly athigher and lower frequencies, intersecting with thethresholds for peripheral and central nerve stimulation atwhich point limits on peripheral nerve stimulation should
apply. For workers who are not trained and who may be
unaware and not in control of their exposure status thebasic restriction is set at the phosphene threshold in order
to avoid these transient but potentially disturbing effects
of exposure. For members of the public, a reduction
factor of 5 is applied to the phosphene threshold.

824

Health Physics

Exposure to low-frequency electric fields causes
well-defined biological responses through surface
electric-charge effects. Prevention of the painful effectsof surface electric charge induced on the body by such
exposure are addressed by the reference levels.
Chronic effects. The literature on chronic effects oflow frequency fields has been evaluated in detail by
individual scientists and scientific panels. WHO’s cancer
research institute, IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), evaluated low frequency magnetic
fields in 2002 and classified them in category 2 B, whichtranslates to “possibly carcinogenic to humans.” Thebasis for this classification was the epidemiologic resultson childhood leukemia.
It is the view of ICNIRP that the currently existingscientific evidence that prolonged exposure to low frequency magnetic fields is causally related with an increased risk of childhood leukemia is too weak to form
the basis for exposure guidelines. In particular, if therelationship is not causal, then no benefit to health willaccrue from reducing exposure.
Dosimetry. Historically, magnetic field models assumed that the body has a homogeneous and isotropic
conductivity and applied simple circular conductive loop
models to estimate induced currents in different organs
and body regions. Electric fields induced by time varying
electric and magnetic fields were computed by using
simple homogeneous ellipsoid models. In recent years,
more realistic calculations based on anatomically andelectrically refined heterogeneous models (Xi andStuchly 1994; Dimbylow 2005, 2006; Bahr et al. 2007)
resulted in a much better knowledge of internal electricfields in the body from exposure to electric and magnetic
fields.
The most useful dosimetric results for the purpose of
these guidelines have been obtained from high resolution
calculations of induced electric field with voxel sizes
below 4 mm (Dimbylow 2005; Bahr et al. 2007; Hirata etal. 2009; Nagaoka et al. 2004). The maximum electricfield is induced in the body when the external fields arehomogeneous and directed parallel to the body axis
(E-field) or perpendicular (H-field). According to those
calculations, the maximum local peak electric field
induced by a 50 Hz magnetic field in the brain isapproximately 23–33 mV m⫺1 per mT, depending onfield orientation and body model. There is no conversion
factor for peripheral nerve tissue available at present.
Therefore, the skin, which contains peripheral nerve
endings, was chosen as a worst-case target tissue. The
electric field induced in the skin by such a field isapproximately 20 – 60 mV m⫺1 per mT. The maximum

December 2010, Volume 99, Number 6

local electric field induced by a 50 Hz electric field in thebrain is approximately 1.7–2.6 mV m⫺1 per kV m⫺1,
while in the skin it is approximately 12–33 mV m⫺1 perkV m⫺1.
In view of the uncertainties in the available dosimetry as well as the influence of body parameters in thederivation of reference levels, ICNIRP is taking a conservative approach in deriving reference levels from thebasic restrictions.
GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EMF EXPOSURE
Separate guidance is given for occupational exposures and exposure of the general public. Occupational
exposure in these guidelines refers to adults exposed totime-varying electric, and magnetic fields from 1 Hz to
10 MHz at their workplaces, generally under known
conditions, and as a result of performing their regular or
assigned job activities. By contrast, the term general
population refers to individuals of all ages and of varying
health status which might increase the variability of theindividual susceptibilities. In many cases, members of
the public are unaware of their exposure to EMF. These
considerations underlie the adoption of more stringent
exposure restrictions for the public than for workers
while they are occupationally exposed.
Addressing scientific uncertainty
All scientific data and their interpretation are subject
to some degree of uncertainty. Examples are methodological variability and inter-individual, inter-species,
and inter-strain differences. Such uncertainties in knowledge are compensated for by reduction factors.
There is, however, insufficient information on all
sources of uncertainty to provide a rigorous basis forestablishing reduction factors over the whole frequency
range and for all modulation patterns. Therefore, thedegree to which caution is applied in the interpretation of
the available database and in defining reduction factors is
to a large extent a matter of expert judgment.
Basic restrictions and reference levels
Limitations of exposure that are based on the physical quantity or quantities directly related to the established health effects are termed basic restrictions. In thisguideline, the physical quantity used to specify the basic
restrictions on exposure to EMF is the internal electricfield strength Ei, as it is the electric field that affects
nerve cells and other electrically sensitive cells.
The internal electric field strength is difficult toassess. Therefore, for practical exposure assessment purposes, reference levels of exposure are provided. Most

Limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields ● ICNIRP

825

reference levels are derived from relevant basic restrictions using measurement and/or computational techniques but some address perception (electric field) andadverse indirect effects of exposure to EMF. The derived
quantities are electric field strength (E), magnetic fieldstrength (H), magnetic flux density (B) and currents
flowing through the limbs (IL). The quantity that addresses indirect effects is the contact current (IC). In any
particular exposure situation, measured or calculated
values of any of these quantities can be compared withthe appropriate reference level. Compliance with thereference level will ensure compliance with the relevant
basic restriction. If the measured or calculated value exceeds the reference level, it does not necessarily follow thatthe basic restriction will be exceeded. However, whenever areference level is exceeded it is necessary to test compliancewith the relevant basic restriction and to determine whether
additional protective measures are necessary.

For the general public for CNS tissue of the head a
reduction factor of 5 is applied, giving a basic restrictionof 10 mV m⫺1 between 10 and 25 Hz. Above and below
these values, the basic restrictions rise. At 1,000 Hz it
intersects with basic restrictions that protect against
peripheral and central myelinated nerve stimulation.
Here, the reduction factor of 10 results in a basic
restriction of 400 mV m⫺1, which should be applied tothe tissues of all parts of the body.
The basic restrictions are presented in Table 2 andFig. 1.

BASIC RESTRICTIONS

Spatial averaging of induced electric field
When restricting adverse effects of induced electricfields to nerve cells and networks, it is important todefine the distance or volume over which the local
induced electric field must be averaged. As a practicalcompromise, satisfying requirements for a sound biological basis and computational constraints, ICNIRP recommends determining the induced electric field as a vector
average of the electric field in a small contiguous tissue
volume of 2 ⫻ 2 ⫻ 2 mm3. For a specific tissue, the 99th
percentile value of the electric field is the relevant value
to be compared with the basic restriction.

The main objective of this publication is to establish
guidelines for limiting EMF exposure that will provide
protection against adverse health effects. As noted above,
the risks come from transient nervous system responses
including peripheral (PNS) and central nerve stimulation(CNS), the induction of retinal phosphenes and possible
effects on some aspects of brain function.
In view of the considerations above for frequencies
in the range 10 Hz to 25 Hz, occupational exposure
should be limited to fields that induce electric fieldstrengths in CNS tissue of the head (i.e., the brain andretina) of less than 50 mV m⫺1 in order to avoid theinduction of retinal phosphenes. These restrictions
should also prevent any possible transient effects on
brain function. These effects are not considered to be
adverse health effects; however, ICNIRP recognizes thatthey may be disturbing in some occupational circumstancesand should be avoided but no additional reduction factor isapplied. Phosphene thresholds rise rapidly at higher andlower frequencies, intersecting with the thresholds for peripheral and central myelinated nerve stimulation at 400 Hz.
At frequencies above 400 Hz, limits on peripheral nerve
stimulation apply in all parts of the body.
Exposure in controlled environments, where workers are informed about the possible transient effects ofsuch exposure, should be limited to fields that induce
electric fields in the head and body of less than 800 mVm⫺1 in order to avoid peripheral and central myelinatednerve stimulation. A reduction factor of 5 has been
applied to a stimulation threshold of 4 V m⫺1 in order toaccount for the uncertainties described above. Such
restrictions rise above 3 kHz.

Time averaging
ICNIRP recommends that the restrictions on internal
electric fields induced by electric or magnetic fields including transient or very short-term peak fields be regarded as
instantaneous values which should not be time averaged(see also section on non-sinusoidal exposure).

Table 2. Basic restrictions for human exposure to time-varying
electric and magnetic fields.
Exposure characteristic
Occupational exposure
CNS tissue of the head

All tissues of head andbody
General public exposure
CNS tissue of the head

All tissues of head andbodyFrequency range

Internal electric field(V m⫺1)

1−10 Hz
10 Hz−25 Hz
25 Hz−400 Hz
400 Hz−3 kHz
3 kHz−10 MHz
1 Hz−3 kHz
3 kHz−10 MHz

0.5/f
0.05
2 ⫻ 10⫺3f
0.8
2.7 ⫻ 10⫺4f
0.8
2.7 ⫻ 10⫺4f

1−10 Hz
10 Hz−25 Hz
25 Hz−1000 Hz
1000 Hz−3 kHz
3 kHz−10 MHz
1 Hz−3 kHz
3 kHz−10 MHz

0.1/f
0.01
4 ⫻ 10⫺4f
0.4
1.35 ⫻ 10⫺4f
0.4
1.35 ⫻ 10⫺4f

Notes:- f is the frequency in Hz.
- All values are rms.
- In the frequency range above 100 kHz, RF specific basic restrictions need
to be considered additionally.

826

Health Physics

December 2010, Volume 99, Number 6

inte
ernal electrric field strength [V/m
m]

100

10

1

0,1

0 01
0,01
1

10

100

1000

10000

100000frequeency [Hz]occupational CNS

occupational PNS

general public CNS

general public PNS

Fig. 1. Basic restrictions for general public and occupational exposure in terms of internal electric field strength
concerning CNS and PNS effects.

Basically the electric field effects on neurons andother electrically excitable cells are local effects, butthere are electrophysiological and practical dosimetricfactors that constrain the minimum volume or distance.
The major physical factor disturbing the function ofneurons and neuronal networks is the voltage producedby the induced electric field over the membrane of thecell. For isolated nerve fibers aligned along the directionof the electric field (maximum coupling) this voltage is
integrated from the electric field over the electrotonic
distance varying from 2 to 7 millimeters for invertebrate
nerves (Reilly 1998; Reilly and Diamant 2003). For
myelinated nerve cells a good assumption for the integration distance is approximately 2 mm, which is the
maximum inter-nodal distance between the nodes ofRanvier. These distances are relevant when considering
stimulation thresholds to isolated nerve cells. In the caseof sub-threshold weak electric field effects, such as
retinal phosphenes, the collective “network” effect ofnumerous interacting nerve cells must be taken into
account. The threshold of the effect is considerably lower
than the stimulation threshold of isolated nerve cells,
which is due to summation and integration of small,induced voltages in the synapses. It has been suggested
that the averaging volume for the induced electric fieldshould be based on minimum of 1,000 interacting cells,
which is approximately 1 mm3 in most nerve tissue(Jefferys 1994). Hence, a biologically reasonable averaging distance might extend from 1 to 7 mm. From apractical point of view, it is difficult to achieve satisfactory accuracy in the millimeter resolution computation of
the induced electric field, and even more difficult tomeasure it. Maximal values in one voxel in a specifictissue are prone to large stair-casing errors associatedwith sharp corners of the cubical voxel. A solution to
obtain more stable peak approximations is based onchoosing for the peak value a value representing the 99th
percentile value of the induced field in a specific tissue.
From the biological point of view however, this is asomewhat arbitrary choice because the peak value depends on the resolution. Another option for the spatial
averaging is to define the local electric field as anaverage in a small volume or along a line segment (Reilly
and Diamant 2003).
As a general rule the averaging volume should notextend beyond the boundary of the tissue except for
tissues such as the retina and skin, which are too thin tocover the whole averaging cube. For the skin the same
averaging volume of 2 ⫻ 2 ⫻ 2 mm3 can be assumed,
and it may extend to the subcutaneous tissue. For the
retina the averaging volume may extend to the tissues infront and behind it.
REFERENCE LEVELS
The reference levels are obtained from the basic
restrictions by mathematical modeling using publisheddata (Dimbylow 2005, 2006). They are calculated for thecondition of maximum coupling of the field to the
exposed individual, thereby providing maximum protection. Frequency dependence and dosimetric uncertainties
were taken into account. The reference levels presented
consider two distinct effects and approximate a combination of the induced electric fields in the brain,

Limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields ● ICNIRP

relevant for CNS effects, and the induced electricfields in non-CNS tissues anywhere in the body,
relevant for PNS effects (i.e., at 50 Hz, the factor used
to convert the basic restriction for CNS effects to an
external magnetic field exposure is 33 V m⫺1 per T,
and for PNS effect 60 V m⫺1 per T. An additional
reduction factor of 3 was applied to these calculated
values to allow for dosimetric uncertainty).
In addition, the electric field reference level for
occupational exposure up to 25 Hz includes a sufficientmargin to prevent stimulation effects from contact currents under most practical conditions. Between 25 Hz
and 10 MHz the reference levels are based on the basic
restriction on induced electric fields only and might thus
not provide a sufficient margin to prevent stimulation
effects from contact currents under all possible conditions in that frequency band.
The electric field reference levels for general public
exposure up to 10 MHz prevent adverse indirect effects(shocks and burns) for more than 90% of exposed
individuals. In addition, the electric field reference levels
for general public exposure up to 50 Hz include asufficient margin to prevent surface electric-charge effects such as perception in most people.
Tables 3 and 4 summarize the reference levels foroccupational and general public exposure, respectively,
and the reference levels are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3.
The reference levels assume an exposure by a uniform(homogeneous) field with respect to the spatial extensionof the human body.
Spatial averaging of external electric andmagnetic fields
Reference levels have been determined for the
exposure conditions where the variation of the electric or
magnetic field over the space occupied by the body isrelatively small. In most cases, however, the distance toTable 3. Reference levels for occupational exposure to timevarying electric and magnetic fields (unperturbed rms values).

Frequency range

E-field
strength
E (kV m⫺1)

Magnetic fieldstrength
H (A m⫺1)

Magnetic
flux density
B (T)1 Hz−8 Hz
8 Hz−25 Hz
25 Hz−300 Hz
300 Hz−3 kHz
3 kHz−10 MHz

2020
5 ⫻ 102/f
5 ⫻ 102/f
1.7 ⫻ 10⫺1

1.63 ⫻ 105/f2
2 ⫻ 104/f
8 ⫻ 1022.4 ⫻ 105/f
80

0.2/f2
2.5 ⫻ 10⫺2/f
1 ⫻ 10⫺3
0.3/f
1 ⫻ 10⫺4

Notes:- f in Hz.
- See separate sections below for advice on non sinusoidal and multiple
frequency exposure.
- To prevent indirect effects especially in high electric fields see chapter on“Protective measures.”- In the frequency range above 100 kHz, RF specific reference levels need
to be considered additionally.

827

Table 4. Reference levels for general public exposure to timevarying electric and magnetic fields (unperturbed rms values).

Frequency range

E-field
strength
E (kV m⫺1)

Magnetic fieldstrength
H (A m⫺1)

Magnetic
flux density
B (T)1 Hz−8 Hz
8 Hz−25 Hz
25 Hz−50 Hz
50 Hz−400 Hz
400 Hz−3 kHz
3 kHz−10 MHz

555
2.5 ⫻ 102/f
2.5 ⫻ 102/f
8.3 ⫻ 10⫺2

3.2 ⫻ 104/f2
4 ⫻ 103/f
1.6 ⫻ 102
1.6 ⫻ 102
6.4 ⫻ 104/f
21

4 ⫻ 10⫺2/f2
5 ⫻ 10⫺3/f
2 ⫻ 10⫺4
2 ⫻ 10⫺4
8 ⫻ 10⫺2/f
2.7 ⫻ 10⫺5Notes:- f in Hz.
- See separate sections below for advice on non sinusoidal and multiple
frequency exposure.
- In the frequency range above 100 kHz, RF specific reference levels need
to be considered additionally.

the source of the field is so close that the distribution of
the field is non-uniform or localized to a small part of the
body. In these cases the measurement of the maximum
field strength in the position of space occupied by the
body always results in a safe, albeit very conservative
exposure assessment.
For a very localized source with a distance of a few
centimeters from the body, the only realistic option for
the exposure assessment is to determine dosimetricallythe induced electric field, case by case. When the
distance exceeds 20 cm, the distribution of the field
becomes less localized but is still non-uniform, in whichcase it is possible to determine the spatial average along
the body or part of it (Stuchly and Dawson 2002; Jokela2007). The spatial average should not exceed the reference level. The local exposure may exceed the reference
level but with an important provision that the basic
restriction shall not be exceeded. It is the task ofstandardization bodies to give further guidance on thespecific exposure situations where the spatial averaging
can be applied. This guidance shall be based on wellestablished dosimetry. The standardization bodies also
may derive new reference levels for special types of
non-uniform exposure.
Additivity of exposure to electric andmagnetic fields
Each of the external electric and magnetic field
induces an electric field component, which add vectorially in the tissue. In the case of the exposure analysis
based on the external electric and magnetic fields, aconservative approach would be to assume that both theelectrically and magnetically induced field components
attain the maximum value in the same critical point at thesame phase. This would imply that the exposures to theexternal electric and magnetic fields are additive (Cech etal. 2008). Such situations, however, are judged to be very

828

Health Physics

December 2010, Volume 99, Number 6

m aagnetic flu
ux density [T]

1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0 00010.00010.00001
10

1

100

1000

10000

100000frequency [Hz]occupational exposure

general public exposure

Fig. 2. Reference levels for exposure to time varying magnetic fields (compare Tables 3 and 4).

e l e c tric fie lld [k V /m ]

100

10

1

01
0.1

0 01
0.01
1

10

100

1000

10000

100000frequency [Hz]occupational exposure

general public exposure

Fig. 3. Reference levels for exposure to time varying electric fields (compare Tables 3 and 4).

infrequent taking into account the great difference in the
distribution of the electrically and magnetically induced
electric fields.

Table 5. Reference levels for time-varying contact currents fromconductive objects.
Frequency
range

Maximum contact
current (mA)

Up to 2.5 kHz
2.5−100 kHz
100 kHz−10 MHz
Up to 2.5 kHz
2.5−100 kHz
100 kHz−10 MHz

1.0
0.4f
40
0.5
0.2f
20

Exposure characteristics

REFERENCE LEVELS FORCONTACT CURRENTS

Occupational exposure

Up to 10 MHz reference levels for contact current
are given for which caution must be exercised to avoid
shock and burn hazards. The point contact reference
levels are presented in Table 5. Since the threshold
contact currents that elicit biological responses in children are approximately one-half of those for adult men,
the reference levels for contact current for the generalpublic are set lower by a factor of 2 than the values foroccupational exposure. It should be noted that the reference levels are not intended to prevent perception but toGeneral public exposure

Note: f is the frequency in kHz.

avoid painful shocks. Perception of contact current is not
per se hazardous but could be considered as annoyance.
Prevention of excess contact currents is possible bytechnical means.

Limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields ● ICNIRPSIMULTANEOUS EXPOSURE TO
MULTIPLE FREQUENCY FIELDS
It is important to determine whether, in situations ofsimultaneous exposure to fields of different frequencies,
these exposures are additive in their effects. The formulae below apply to relevant frequencies under practical
exposure situations. For electrical stimulation, relevant
for frequencies up to 10 MHz, internal electric fields
should be added according to冘10 MHz E i,jj⫽1 Hz EL,j

ⱕ1

(3)

where Ei,j is the internal electric field strength induced at
frequency j, and EL, j is the induced electric field strength
restriction at frequency j as given in Table 2.
For practical application of the basic restrictions, thefollowing criteria regarding reference levels of fieldstrengths should be applied:冘 E ⱕ1

10 MHz E jj⫽1 Hz

(4)

R,j

and

冘

10 MHz H jj⫽1 Hz HR,j

ⱕ1

(5)

where
Ej ⫽ the electric field strength at frequency j;
ER, j ⫽ the electric field strength reference level atfrequency j as given in Tables 3 and 4;
Hj ⫽ is the magnetic field strength at frequency j;
HR, j ⫽ the magnetic field strength reference level atfrequency j as given in Tables 3 and 4.
For limb current and contact current, respectively,
the following requirements should be applied:冘

10 MHz I jj⫽1 Hz IL,j

ⱕ1

(6)

where Ij is the contact current component at frequency j,
and IL,j is the reference level of the contact current at
frequency j as given in Table 5.
NON SINUSOIDAL EXPOSURE
At low frequencies below 100 kHz the electric andparticularly magnetic fields are in most cases distorted byharmonic components distributed over a large frequency
band. Consequently, the waveforms of the fields showcomplex, often pulsed, patterns. It is always possible todecompose such a field to discrete spectral components
by using, e.g., Fourier Transformation techniques (FT)829

and applying the multiple frequency rule describedabove. This procedure is based on the assumption that the
spectral components add in phase, i.e., all maxima
coincide at the same time and results in a sharp peak.
This is a realistic assumption when the number ofspectral components is limited and their phases are notcoherent, i.e., they vary randomly. For fixed coherent
phases the assumption may be unnecessarily conservative. Additionally, sampling and windowing in FT spectral analysis may create spurious frequencies, which may
artificially increase the linearly summed exposure ratio.
An alternative option to the spectral method is toweight the external electric and magnetic fields, induced electric field and induced current with a filter
function which is related to the basic restriction orreference level (ICNIRP 2003b; Jokela 2000). In thecase of a broadband field consisting of harmoniccomponents the restriction imposed by the filtering
can be presented mathematically as

冏冘

冏

Ai
cos共2␲fit ⫹ ␪i ⫹ ␸i兲 ⱕ 1,
ELi
i

(7)

where t is time and ELi is the exposure limit at the ith
harmonic frequency fi, where Ai, ␪i, ␸i, are the amplitudesof the field, phase angles of the field and phase angles ofthe filter at the harmonic frequencies. Except the phaseangles, the equation is similar to the summation eqns (3),(4), and (5). More guidance on the practical implementationof the weighting (determination of the weighted peak
exposure) is given in the informative annex (Appendix).
PROTECTIVE MEASURESICNIRP notes that protection of people exposed toelectric and magnetic fields could be ensured by compliance with all aspects of these guidelines.
Measures for the protection of workers include
engineering and administrative controls, and personal
protection programs. Appropriate protective measures
must be implemented when exposure in the workplace
results in the basic restrictions being exceeded. As a firststep, engineering controls should be undertaken wherever possible to reduce device emissions of fields toacceptable levels. Such controls include good safety
design and, where necessary, the use of interlocks orsimilar health protection mechanisms.
Administrative controls, such as limitations on access and the use of audible and visible warnings, should
be used in conjunction with engineering controls. Personal protection measures, such as protective clothing,though useful in certain circumstances, should be regarded as a last resort to ensure the safety of the worker,

830

Health Physics

and priority should be given to engineering and administrative controls wherever possible. Furthermore, whensuch items as insulated gloves are used to protect
individuals from shock, the basic restrictions must not be
exceeded, since the insulation protects only against
indirect effects of the fields.
With the exception of protective clothing and otherpersonal protection, the same measures can be applied to
the general public whenever there is a possibility that thegeneral public reference levels might be exceeded. It isalso essential to establish and implement rules that will
prevent● interference with medical electronic equipment anddevices (including cardiac pacemakers);● detonation of electro-explosive devices (detonators);
and● fires and explosions resulting from ignition of flammable materials by sparks caused by induced fields,
contact currents, or spark discharges.
CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING POSSIBLE
LONG-TERM EFFECTS
As noted above, epidemiological studies have consistently found that everyday chronic low-intensity(above 0.3– 0.4 ␮T) power frequency magnetic field
exposure is associated with an increased risk of childhood leukemia. IARC has classified such fields as
possibly carcinogenic. However, a causal relationshipbetween magnetic fields and childhood leukemia has notbeen established nor have any other long term effects
been established. The absence of established causality
means that this effect cannot be addressed in the basic
restrictions. However, risk management advice, including considerations on precautionary measures, has been
given by WHO (2007a and b) and other entities.

Acknowledgments—The support received by ICNIRP from the International Radiation Protection Association, the World Health Organization,
the International Labour Office, the European Commission, and theGerman Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and
Nuclear Safety is gratefully acknowledged. ICNIRP is also very thankful to
the ICNIRP consulting experts and all other reviewers for their contribution received via the open online consultation.
During the preparation of these guidelines, the composition of theInternational Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection and the
ICNIRP ELF Task Group were as follows:
ICNIRP
P. Vecchia, Chairperson (Italy)
M. Hietanen, Vice-Chairperson until 2008 (Finland)
R. Matthes, Vice-Chairperson since 2008 (Germany)
A. Ahlbom until 2008 (Sweden)
E. Breitbart until 2008 (Germany)
F. R. de Gruijl until 2008 (The Netherlands)
M. Feychting (Sweden)
A. Green (Australia)
K. Jokela (Finland)

December 2010, Volume 99, Number 6
J. Lin (USA)R. Saunders (United Kingdom)
K. Schulmeister (Austria)
P. Söderberg (Sweden)
B. Stuck (USA)A. Swerdlow (United Kingdom)
M. Taki until 2008 (Japan)
B. Veyret (France)
G. Ziegelberger, Scientific Secretary (Austria)
M. H. Repacholi, Chairman Emeritus (Switzerland)
ICNIRP ELF Task GroupR. Matthes (Germany), ELF Task Group Chairman
A. Ahlbom (Sweden)
K. Jokela (Finland)
C. Roy (Australia)
R. Saunders (United Kingdom)

REFERENCES
Ahlbom A, Day N, Feychting M, Roman E, Skinner J,
Dockerty J, Linet M, McBride M, Michaelis J, Olsen JH,
Tynes T, Verkasalo PK. A pooled analysis of magnetic
fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer 83:692– 698;
2000.
Attwell D. Interaction of low frequency electric fields with thenervous system: the retina as a model system. Radiat Protect
Dosim 106:341–348; 2003.
Bahr A, Bolz T, Hennes C. Numerical dosimetry ELF: Accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters,
and the implication for quantifying guidelines. Health Phys
92:521–530; 2007.
Barth A, Ponocny I, Ponocny-Seliger E, Vana N, Winker R.
Effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic field exposure
on cognitive functions: results of a meta-analysis. Bioelectromagnetics 31:173–179; 2010.
Cech R, Leitgeb N, Pediaditis M. Current densities in apregnant woman model induced by simultaneous ELF
electric and magnetic field exposure. Phys Med Biol
53:177–186; 2008.
Cook CM, Thomas AW, Prato FS. Human electrophysiologicaland cognitive effects of exposure to ELF magnetic and ELF
modulated RF and microwave fields: a review of recent
studies. Bioelectromagnetics 23:144 –157; 2002.
Cook CM, Saucier DM, Thomas AW, Prato FS. Exposure to
ELF magnetic and ELF-modulated radiofrequency fields:
the time-course of physiological and cognitive effects observed in recent studies (2001–2005). Bioelectromagnetics
27:613– 627; 2006.
Crasson M. 50 – 60 Hz electric and magnetic field effects on
cognitive function in humans: a review. Radiat Protect
Dosim 106:333–340; 2003.
Crumpton MJ, Collins AR. Are environmental electromagnetic
fields genotoxic? DNA Repair (Amst) 3:1385–1387; 2004.
Dimbylow PJ. Development of the female voxel phantom,
NAOMI and its application to calculations of induced
current densities and electric fields from applied low frequency magnetic and electric fields. Phys Med Biol
50:1047–1070; 2005.
Dimbylow PJ. Development of pregnant female, hybrid voxelmathematical models and their application to the dosimetryof applied magnetic and electric fields at 50 Hz. Phys Med
Biol 51:2383–2394; 2006.
Garcia AM, Sisternas A, Hoyos SP. Occupational exposure to
extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields andAlzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol
37:329 –340; 2008.

Limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields ● ICNIRP

Greenland S, Sheppard AR, Kaune WT, Poole C, Kelsh MA. A
pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia. Epidemiol 11:624 – 634; 2000.
Hirata A, Wake K, Watanabe S, Taki M. In-situ electric fieldand current density in Japanese male and female models foruniform magnetic field exposures. Radiat Protect Dosim
135:272–275; 2009.
Huss A, Spoerri A, Egger M, Röösli M. Residence near powerlines and mortality from neurodegenerative diseases: longitudinal study of the Swiss population. Am J Epidemiol
169:167–175; 2009.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Static andextremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields. Lyon,
France: IARC; IARC Monographs on the Evaluation ofCarcinogenic Risk to Humans Volume 80; 2002.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz).
Health Phys 74:494 –522; 1998.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. General approach to protection against non-ionizing
radiation. Health Phys 82:540 –548; 2002.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Exposure to static and low frequency electromagnetic
fields, biological effects and health consequences (0 –100
kHz). In: Bernhardt JH, Matthes R, McKinlay A, Vecchia P,
Veyret B, eds. Review of the scientific evidence and healthconsequences. Munich: ICNIRP; 2003a.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidance on determining compliance of exposure topulsed and complex non-sinusoidal waveforms below 100
kHz with ICNIRP guidelines. Health Phys 84:383–387;
2003b.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: protection of patients. Health Phys 87:197–216; 2004.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines on limiting exposure to static magnetic
fields. Health Phys 96:504 –514; 2009.
International Electrotechnical Commission. Exposure to electric or magnetic fields in the low and intermediate frequency
range—methods for calculating the current density andinternal electric field induced in the human body. Geneva:
IEC 62226; 2004.
International Electrotechnical Commission. Measurement
methods for electromagnetic fields of household appliancesand similar apparatus with regard to human exposure. IEC
62233; 2005a.
International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electricalequipment—part 1: general requirements for safety; 2:collateral standard: electromagnetic compatibility—requirements and tests. Geneva: IEC 60601-1-2; 2005b.
IEEE. IEEE 1308 Recommended Practice for Instrumentation:
Specifications for Magnetic Flux Density and Electric Field
Strength Meters - 10 Hz to 3 kHz. IEEE, Piscataway; 1994.
IEEE. IEEE 644-1994 (Reaff 2008). IEEE Standard Proceduresfor Measurement of Power Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields from AC Power Lines; IEEE, Piscataway; 2008.
Jefferys JG. Experimental neurobiology of epilepsies. Curr
Opin neurol 7:113–122; 1994.
Jokela K. Restricting exposure to pulsed and broadband magnetic fields. Health Phys 79:373–388; 2000.
Jokela K. Assessment of complex emf exposure situations
including inhomogeneous field distribution. Health Phys
92:531–540; 2007.

831

Juutilainen J. Developmental effects of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields. Radiat Protect Dosim
106:385–390; 2003.
Juutilainen J. Developmental effects of electromagnetic fields.
Bioelectromagnetics 7:107–115; 2005.
Kanai R, Chaieb L, Antal A, Walsh V, Paulus W. Frequencydependent electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. Curr
Biol 18:1839 –1843; 2008.
Kheifets L, Ahlbom A, Johansen C, Feychting M, Sahl J,
Savitz D. Extremely low-frequency magnetic fields andheart disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 33:5–12; 2007.
Kheifets L, Bowman JD, Checkoway H, Feychting M, Harrington M, Kavet R, Marsh G, Mezei G, Renew DC, van
Wijngaarden E. Future needs of occupational epidemiology
of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields:
review and recommendations. Occup Environ Med 66:72–
80; 2009.
McNamee DA, Legros AG, Krewski DR, Wisenberg G, Prato
FS, Thomas AW. A literature review: the cardiovasculareffects of exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:919 –933;
2009.
Nagaoka T, Watanabe S, Sakurai K, Kunieda E, Watanabe S,Taki M, Yamanaka Y. Development of realistic highresolution whole-body voxel models of Japanese adultmales and females of average height and weight, andapplication of models to radio-frequency electromagneticfield dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 49:1–15; 2004.
Nyenhuis JA, Bourland JD, Kildishev AV, Schaefer DJ. Healtheffects and safety of intense gradient fields. In: Shellock F,
ed. Magnetic resonance procedures: Health effects andsafety. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001: 31–54.
Pogosyan A, Gaynor LD, Eusebio A, Brown P. Boostingcortical activity at beta-band frequencies slows movementin humans. Curr Biol 19:1–5; 2009.
Reilly J. Applied bioelectricity: from electrical stimulation toelectropathology. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998.
Reilly JP. Comments concerning “guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 76:314 –315;
1999.
Reilly JP. Neuroelectric mechanisms applied to low frequency
electric and magnetic field exposure guidelines—part I:
sinusoidal waveforms. Health Phys 83:341–355; 2002.
Reilly J, Diamant A. Spatial relationships in electrostimulation:
application to electromagnetic field standards. IEEE Transon Biomed Eng 50:783–785; 2003.
Rubin GJ, Das Munshi J, Wessely S. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a systematic review of provocation studies.
Psychosom Med 67:224 –232; 2005.
Saunders RD, Jefferys JG. Weak electric field interactions in
the central nervous system. Health Phys 83:366 –375; 2002.
Saunders RD, Jefferys JG. A neurobiological basis for ELF
guidelines. Health Phys 92:596 – 603; 2007.
So PPM, Stuchly MA, Nyenhuis JA. Peripheral nerve stimulation by gradient switching fields in magnetic resonanceimaging. IEEE Trans on Biomed Eng 51:1907–1914; 2004.
Stuchly MA, Dawson TW. Human body exposure to powerlines: relation of induced quantities to external magnetic
field. Health Phys 83:333–340; 2002.
World Health Organization. Environmental Health Criteria
238. Extremely low frequency (ELF) fields. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2007a.
World Health Organization. Electromagnetic fields and publichealth: exposure to extremely low frequency fields. Fact
Sheet No 322. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007b.

832

Health Physics

December 2010, Volume 99, Number 6

Xi W, Stuchly MA. High spatial resolution analysis of electric
currents induced in men by ELF magnetic fields. Appl
Comput Electromagn Soc J 9:127–134; 1994.

APPENDIX
Informative annex
Determination of the weighted peak exposure.
The weighting may be implemented by computing firstthe spectrum of the waveform and then applying eqn (7).
In many applications, however, it is more convenient touse analog or digital filtering of the waveform in the time
domain. The gain of the filter (ratio of the output to the
input signal) should vary as a function of frequency indirect proportion to the exposure limit G ⫽ EL(fref)/EL(f),where EL is the limit at frequency f and fref is an arbitraryreference frequency from 1 Hz to 100 kHz. The peakvalue of the filtered waveform should not exceed theexposure limit (basic restriction or reference level) converted to the peak (amplitude) value at the reference
frequency. Table 6 shows an example of the derived peak
limits. In addition to the amplitude physical filters always
influence on the phase of the field, which changes thepeak value of the filtered field. As shown in Figs. 1, 2,
and 3 the limits are divided to the frequency ranges
where the limit varies directly proportional to 1/f 2, 1/f, f 0(constant), or f. On the 1/f 2, 1/f, f 0, and f ranges the phaseangle of the filter ␸i (see eqn 7) is 180, 90, 0, and ⫺90°,
respectively. The weighting filter can be approximatedwith an electronic or digital filter where the attenuation
should not deviate more than 3 dB and phase more than
90° from the exact piecewise linear frequency response.
As an example, Fig. A1 shows the attenuation and phaseas a function of frequency for the filter used for theweighting of the induced electric field. The approximate
curves are based on a simple approximation with RC(resistor/capacitor) type filter function. The weighted
peak approach can be used both for coherent and noncoherent fields. In the latter case the measurement timemust be long enough to detect the worst case peak value
with a reasonable probability. In the case of non-coherent
fields, consisting of a few frequencies, the weighted peak
approach is identical to the spectral summation.

Table 6. Derived peak limits for non-sinusoidal electric andmagnetic fields. The reference frequency is 50 Hz.
Einduced(mV m⫺1)
Brain
Occupational
General public

bodytissueEexternal(V m⫺1)B
␮T冑2 ⫻ 100 冑2 ⫻ 800 冑2 ⫻ 10,000 冑2 ⫻ 1,000冑2 ⫻ 20 冑2 ⫻ 400 冑2 ⫻ 5,000 冑2 ⫻ 200

Fig. A1. Amplitude and phase response for the weighting of theinduced electric field.

GLOSSARY
Adverse effect
An effect detrimental to the health of an individual
due to exposure to an electric or magnetic field, or acontact current.
Averaging distanceThe distance over which the internal electric field
is averaged when determining compliance with basic
restrictions.
Basic restrictions
Mandatory limitations on the quantities that closely
match all known biophysical interaction mechanisms
with tissue that may lead to adverse health effects.
Cancer
Diseases characterized by the uncontrolled and abnormal division of eukaryotic cells and by the spread ofthe disease (metastasis) to disparate sites in the organism.
Central nervous system (CNS)
The portion of the vertebrate nervous system consisting of the brain and spinal cord, but not including theperipheral nerves.

Limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields ● ICNIRP

Characteristics
Detailed physical properties of electric or magnetic
fields such as the magnitude, frequency spectrum, polarization, modulation, etc.
Conductivity
A property of materials that determines the magnitude of the electric current density when an electric field
is impressed on the material, expressed in units ofsiemens per meter (S m⫺1); the inverse of resistivity.
Contact current
Current passed into a biological medium via acontacting electrode or other source of current.
Current density
A vector of which the integral over a given surface
is equal to the current flowing through the surface; themean density in a linear conductor is equal to the current
divided by the cross-sectional area of the conductor.
Expressed in ampere per square meter (A m⫺2).

833

Electric field strength (E)Force exerted by an electric field on an electric point
charge, divided by the electric charge. Electric fieldstrength is expressed in newton per coulomb or volts permeter (N/C ⫽ V/m).
Electromagnetic energy
The energy stored in an electromagnetic field. Expressed in joule (J).
Electromagnetic fields
The combination of electric and magnetic fields inthe environment. This term is often confused with “electromagnetic radiation” and can therefore be misleadingwhen used with extremely low frequencies for which theradiation is barely detectable.
Electro stimulation
Induction of a propagating action potential in excitable tissue by an applied electrical stimulus; electricalpolarization of presynaptic processes leading to a change
in post synaptic cell activity.

DC
Abbreviation for “direct current,” but also used forto indicate constancy of fields, see “Static field.”

EMF
Electric and magnetic fields.

Depolarization (cellular)
The reduction of the resting potential across a cellular
membrane.

Established mechanism
A bioelectric mechanism having the following characteristics: (a) can be used to predict a biological effect inhumans; (b) an explicit model can be made using
equations or parametric relationships; (c) has been verified in humans, or animal data can be confidently
extrapolated to humans; (d) is supported by strong
evidence; and (e) is widely accepted among experts in thescientific community.

Direct effectA biological effect resulting from direct interactionof EMF with biological structures.
Direct electro stimulation
Stimulation via the electric field within the biological medium induced by an external electric or magnetic
field without direct contact with other conductors or
spark discharges.

ExposureThat which occurs whenever a person is subject tothe influence of a low frequency field or contact current.

DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid)A polymeric molecule consisting of deoxyribonucleotide building blocks that in a double-stranded,double-helical form is the genetic material of mostorganisms.

Exposure, long-term
This term indicates exposure during a major part ofthe lifetime of the biological system involved; it may,therefore, vary from a few weeks to many years induration.

Dosimetry
Measurement, or determination by calculation, ofinternal electric field strength or induced current density
or specific absorption (SA), or specific absorption rate(SAR), in humans or animals exposed to electromagnetic
fields.

Exposure assessment
The evaluation of a person’s exposure by measurements, modeling, information about sources or othermeans.

Electric field
A vector field E measured in volts per meter.

Exposure metric
A single number that summarizes exposure to anelectric and/or magnetic field. The metric is usually
determined by a combination of the instrument’s signal

834

Health Physics

processing and the data analysis performed after themeasurement.
Frequency
The number of sinusoidal cycles completed byelectromagnetic waves in 1 second; usually expressed inhertz (Hz).
General public
The term General public refers to the entire population. It includes individuals of all ages, and of varying
health status, and this will include particularly vulnerable
groups or individuals such as the frail, elderly, pregnant
workers, babies and young children.
General public exposure
All exposure to low frequency fields received bymembers of the general public. This definition excludes
occupational exposure, and medical exposure.
Harmonic (frequency)
Frequencies that are integral multiples of the power
frequency or some other reference frequency.
Heart rate
The measurement of the number of heartbeats per
minute.
Hertz (Hz)The unit for expressing frequency, (f). One hertz
equals one cycle per second. 1 kHz ⫽ 1,000 Hz, 1
MHz ⫽ 1,000 kHz, 1 GHz ⫽ 1,000 MHz.
Induction
An electric or magnetic field in a conducting medium caused by the action of a time-varying external(environmental) electric or magnetic field.
Instantaneous
Adjective used to describe particular parameters thatmust be measured or evaluated over a very short timeinterval (typically 100 microseconds or less).
Let-go current
The threshold current level at which involuntarymuscular contraction prevents release of a grip on anenergized conductor.
Magnetic field
A vector quantity, H, specifies a magnetic field at
any point in space, and is expressed in ampere per meter(A m⫺1). See also magnetic flux density.

December 2010, Volume 99, Number 6

Magnetic field strength (H)The magnitude of the magnetic field vector; expressed in units of ampere per meter (A/m).
Magnetic flux density (B)A vector quantity that determines the force on amoving charge or charges (electric current). Magnetic
flux density is expressed in tesla (T). One gauss (deprecated unit) equals 10⫺4 T.
Magnetophosphenes
The sensation of flashes of light caused by induced
electric currents stimulating the retina.
Mean
The arithmetic average of a series of measurements
or other data.
Median threshold
The threshold value within a statistical distribution
at which 50% of subjects have greater thresholds and
50% have lesser thresholds.
Medical exposure
Exposure of a person to low frequency fields received as a patient undergoing medical diagnosis orrecognized medical treatment, or as a volunteer in medical research.
MutagenA substance that is able to cause a mutation.
MutationAny detectable and heritable change in the genetic
material not caused by genetic recombination.
Nerve
A bundle of axons.
Nerve fiber
A single nerve axon.
NeuronA single cellular unit usually consisting of an axon,
cell body, and dendritic tree.
Non-ionizing radiation (NIR)
Includes all radiations and fields of the electromagnetic spectrum that do not normally have sufficientenergy to produce ionization in matter; characterized byenergy per photon less than about 12 eV, which isequivalent to wavelengths greater than 100 nm, or
frequencies lower than 3 ⫻ 1015 Hz.

Limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields ● ICNIRPNo uniform field
A field that is not constant in amplitude, direction,and relative phase over the dimensions of the body or
body part under consideration. In the case of electricfields, the definition applies to an environmental field
undisturbed by the presence of the body.
Occupational exposure
All exposure to EMF experienced by individuals asa result of performing their regular or assigned job
activities.
Peripheral nerve
Nerve found outside the central nervous system andleading to and from the central nervous system.
Permeability
The scalar or tensor quantity whose product by themagnetic field strength is the magnetic flux density.
Note: For isotropic media, the permeability is a scalar;for anisotropic media, a matrix. Synonym: absolutepermeability. If the permeability of a material or medium
is divided by the permeability of vacuum (magnetic
constant) ␮0, the result is termed relative permeability(␮). Unit: henrys per meter (H m⫺1).
Permittivity
A constant defining the influence of an isotropic
medium on the forces of attraction or repulsion between
electrified bodies, and expressed in farad per meter(F/m); relative permittivity is the permittivity of a material or medium divided by the permittivity of vacuum.
Phase duration (tp)
The time between zero crossings of a waveformhaving zero mean. For a sine wave of frequency f, tp ⫽1/(2f). For an exponential waveform, tp is interpreted as
the duration measured from the waveform peak to a point
at which it decays to 0.37 (e⫺1) of its peak value.
Phosphene
Visual sensation caused by non-photic stimuli.
Electro-phosphenes are induced by electric currents;
magneto-phosphenes are induced magnetically.
Plasma membrane
Lipid bilayer that surrounds the cytoplasm of bothanimal and plant cells.
Polarization (cellular)
The electric potential formed across a cell membrane.
Power frequency
The frequency at which AC electricity is generated.
For electric utilities, the power frequency is 60 Hz in

835

North America, Brazil, and parts of Japan, and 50 Hz inmuch of the rest of the world.
Protein
One of a group of high-molecular weight, nitrogencontaining organic compounds of complex shape andcomposition.
Public exposure
All exposure to EMF experienced by members of
the general public, excluding occupational exposure andexposure during medical procedures.
Radiofrequency (RF)Electromagnetic energy with frequencies in therange 3 kHz to 300 GHz.
Reduction factor
Reduction of the effect threshold to compensate forvarious sources of uncertainty in the guideline setting
process. Some examples of sources of uncertainty about
exposure-effect threshold levels include the extrapolationof animal data to effects on humans, differences in thephysiological reserves of different people with corresponding differences in tolerance, and statistical uncertainties (confidence limits) in the dose-response function.
In ICNIRP’s view, uncertainty in measurements used to
implement the guidelines is a problem more appropriate
to the functions of organizations responsible for thedevelopment of compliance methods. It is not consideredin the setting of reduction factors by ICNIRP.
Reference levels
The rms and peak electric and magnetic fields andcontact currents to which a person may be exposed
without an adverse effect and with acceptable safety
factors. The reference levels for electric and magnetic
field exposure in this document may be exceeded if it
can be demonstrated that the basic restrictions are notexceeded.
Thus, it is a practical or “surrogate” parameters that
may be used for determining compliance with the Basic
Restrictions.
Relative permeability(Absolute) permeability (q.v.) divided by the permeability in vacuum. A value near one signifies that thematerial is only weakly magnetized by an external field.
Relative phase
The phase angle of a sinusoidal waveform relative tothe phase angle of another waveform measured at adifferent point within the conductive medium or withrespect to a stated reference waveform.

836

Health Physics

December 2010, Volume 99, Number 6

Relative risk (RR)
The ratio of the disease rate in the group under study
to that in a comparison group, with adjustments forconfounding factors such as age, if necessary. For rarediseases, the relative risk is practically the same as theodds ratio.

Static field
A field that does not vary with time. In mostenvironments, electric and magnetic fields change withtime, but their frequency spectrum has a component at 0
Hz. This “quasi-static” component of the field can bemeasured by averaging the oscillating signal over the
sample time.

Root mean square (rms)
The square root of the mean of the square of a time
variant function, F(t), over a specified time period fromt1 to t2. It is derived by first squaring the function andthen determining the mean value of the squares obtained,
and taking the square root of that mean value, i.e.,

Tesla (T)S.I. unit of magnetic flux density. 1 tesla ⫽ 10,000
gauss (q.v.).

冑 冕
t2

1
关F共t兲兴2 dt.
t2 ⫺ t1

Threshold
The level of a stimulus marking the boundary
between a response and a no response.

(A1)

Ventricular fibrillation
Arrhythmia of the ventricles of the heart characterized by rapid uncoordinated contractions.

Abbreviation for the International system of units.

Voxel
A three-dimensional computational element. In thisstandard used to represent animal and human tissues in
dosimetry models.

F rms ⫽t1

S.I.

Spatial peakTerm used to describe the highest level of a particular quantity averaged over a small mass or area in thehuman body.
Spark discharge
The transfer of current through an air gap requiring
a voltage high enough to ionize the air, as opposed todirect contact with a source.

Waveform
The variation of an electrical amplitude with time.
Unless otherwise stated, in this standard the term waveform refers to values (or measurements) at sites within
the biological medium.
Workers
See glossary term Occupational exposure.
f f