History and Evolution of Public Education in the US

Throughout the history of public education in the US, public schools have filled multiple roles.
These roles are an outgrowth of why public schools came into being and how they have evolved.
This publication briefly reviews that history. For a look at how these historical purposes shapeeducation today, see CEP’s 2020 publication, For the Common Good: Recommitting to Public
Education in a Time of Crisis, available at www.cep-dc.org.

Before Public Schools
In the early years of the nation, schooling was haphazard. Many children were excluded on
the basis of income, race or ethnicity, gender, geographic location, and other reasons.
The children who did receive instruction, primarily white children, were educated through ahodgepodge of arrangements:
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦

Church-supported schools
Local schools organized by towns or groups of parents
Tuition schools set up by traveling schoolmasters
Charity schools for poor children run by churches or benevolent societies
Boarding schools for children of the well-to-do“Dame schools” run by women in their homes
Private tutoring or home schoolingWork apprenticeships with some rudimentary instruction in reading, writing, andarithmetic

Early schools were financed from various sources and often charged tuition.
Without a formal system for funding education, local schools were dependent on parents’ tuition
payments, charitable contributions, property taxes, fuel contributions, and in some cases state
support. At the time of the American Revolution, some cities and towns in the Northeast had free
local schools paid for by all town residents, but this was not the norm. (A few Northeastern cities
also had free schools for African American children.)Center on Education Policy

www.cep-dc.org

2Children in the South were educated mostly in tuition-charging or parent-organized schools.
Some rural areas had no schools. The schools that did exist outside of cities were often hard to get
to, skimpily equipped, and overcrowded. Teachers were poorly paid, transient, and inexperienced,
and some were undereducated themselves. In no state was education compulsory or fully
supported by taxes.

Democracy and the Origins of Public Schools
Preparing people for democratic citizenship was a major reason for the creation of publicschools.
The Founding Fathers maintained that the success of the fragile American democracy would
depend on the competency of its citizens. They believed strongly that preserving democracy
would require an educated population that could understand political and social issues and would
participate in civic life, vote wisely, protect their rights and freedoms, and resist tyrants anddemagogues. Character and virtue were also considered essential to good citizenship, andeducation was seen as a means to provide moral instruction and build character. While voterswere limited to white males, many leaders of the early nation also supported educating girls on
the grounds that mothers were responsible for educating their own children, were partners onfamily farms, and set a tone for the virtues of the nation.
The nations’ founders recognized that educating people for citizenship would be difficult toaccomplish without a more systematic approach to schooling. Soon after the American
Revolution, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and other early leaders proposed the creation of amore formal and unified system of publicly funded schools. While some Northeasterncommunities had already established publicly funded or free schools by the late 1780s, theconcept of free public education did not begin to take hold on a wider scale until the 1830s.
The new federal government provided encouragement and support for establishing publicschools.
Although the main responsibility for schooling rested with states and localities, federal
ordinances passed in 1785 and 1787 gave substantial acreage of federal lands in trust to new statesentering the union, as long as the states agreed to set aside a portion of these lands for the
support of public schools. 1 These federal “land grants” not only supported the creation andmaintenance of schools in each of the townships carved out of former territories, but also helped
to build stable communities across the country, each with a local government and education
system. The land grants show the value placed on education as positive element of nationbuilding by the first federal leaders.

1 At the time of these Ordinances, most of the territory west of the Mississippi was federally owned.

Center on Education Policy

www.cep-dc.org

3

The Establishment of “Common Schools”
The “common school” movement encouraged the creation of public schools for multiple
purposes.
In the 1830s, Horace Mann, a Massachusetts legislator and secretary of that state’s board ofeducation, began to advocate for the creation of public schools that would be universally available
to all children, free of charge, and funded by the state. Mann and other proponents of “common
schools” emphasized that a public investment in education would benefit the whole nation bytransforming children into literate, moral, and productive citizens.
Common school advocates emphasized the knowledge, civic, and economic benefits of publicschooling. Common schools would teach the “three R’s” (reading, writing, arithmetic), along withother subjects such as history, geography, grammar, and rhetoric. A strong dose of moral
instruction would also be provided to instill civic virtues. Educating children of the poor andmiddle classes would prepare them to obtain good jobs, proponents argued, and thereby
strengthen the nation’s economic position. In addition to preparing students for citizenship andwork, education was seen by some reformers as a means for people to achieve happiness andfulfillment.
Common schools were also proposed as a way to promote cohesion across social classes andimprove social outcomes.
Reformers argued that common schools would not truly serve as a unifying force if private schools
drew off substantial numbers of students, resources, and parental support from the mostadvantaged groups. In order to succeed, a system of common schooling would have to enroll
sufficient numbers of children from all social classes, including the most affluent and welleducated families. This idea met with resistance from many Americans who did not want to pay
to educate other people’s children. And some passionate advocates of common schools did notinterpret a “universal” system of public education as being equally available to children of all races
and ethnicities.
Advocates saw universal education as a means to eliminate poverty, crime, and other social
problems. Some early leaders argued that the costs of properly educating children in publicschools would be far less than the expenses of punishing and jailing criminals and coping withproblems stemming from poverty.

Center on Education Policy

www.cep-dc.org

4

The Spread of Public Education
The path toward providing universal access to free education was gradual and uneven.
Throughout the 19th century, public schools took hold at a faster pace in some communities thanin others. Public schools were more common in cities than in rural areas, and in the Northeast
than in other parts of the country. As explained below, it also took longer for children of color,girls, and children with special needs to gain access to free public education.
Gradually, more states accepted responsibility for providing universal public education andembedded this principle in their state constitutions. Not until the latter part of the 19th century,
however, did public elementary schools become available to all children in nearly all parts of thecountry. In 1830, about 55% of children aged 5 to 14 were enrolled in public schools; by 1870, thisfigure had risen to about 78%. 2
High school attendance did not become commonplace until the 20th century. In 1910, just 14% of
Americans aged 25 and older had completed high school. As recently as 1970, the high school
completion rate was only 55%. In 2017, 90% of Americans aged 25 and older had a high school
degree. 3
The process of establishing local public schools was itself an exercise in community building.
The actions of local people coming together “to run their schools, to build schoolhouses, to hire
teachers, and to collect taxes” helped forge a sense of community and made people invested intheir schools. 4 Once established, public schools often became community centers where people of
all ages came together for meetings, exhibitions, entertainment, and other social activities. In
some small and rural communities, schools were the only public building suitable for these
purposes.

Diversity and Immigration
Early public school advocates maintained that educating children from different economic,
religious, and European ethnic backgrounds in the same schools would help them learn to getalong.

2 Johann N. Neem, Democracy’s Schools: The Rise of Public Education in America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University

Press, 2017), p. 177.

3 https://census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2017/educational-attainment-2017.html.
4 Carl Kaestle, Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780-1860 (New York: Hill and Wang,

1983), p. 185.

Center on Education Policy

www.cep-dc.org

5

The rationale was that when children from diverse backgrounds interacted in the sameclassrooms, they would find common ground, learn to respect each other, and learn skills ofgetting along. Some reformers further envisioned that educating children together would help
forge a common American culture. This ideal was compromised, however, by segregated school
systems and other exclusionary practices that persisted into the 20th century.
Children of color were discriminated against in access to public education.
In the early years of the nation, non-white groups were often excluded from school. When thesegroups did gain access to public schooling, they were often underserved or educated in separate
schools, by law or by custom. Almost all of the Southern states enacted laws that prohibited
teaching African Americans to read. After the Civil War, Southern states restructured their state
constitutions as a condition for reentry to the Union. These new constitutions established freeeducation as a basic right for both races and created structures for governing and financing public
education. But the political power to implement this vision was fleeting; beginning in the 1870s,
white supremacists took control of Southern state governments and passed “Jim Crow” laws thatenforced segregation in public schooling and other major aspects of life. In some states andcommunities, Latinx students or Chinese American students were forced to attend segregatedschools. And many American Indian children were sent to federally run day or boarding schools,
where the goal was often to assimilate the students into white culture and discourage their Native
culture.
Access was unequal for other groups.
Schools were slower to provide full access to girls than for boys. When public schools did open up
to girls, they were sometimes taught a different curriculum from boys and had fewer
opportunities for secondary or higher education. Children with disabilities were often kept athome or put in institutions where they received little or no education.
Increased immigration placed new demands on public schools.
As waves of immigrants arrived in the US in the 19th and early 20th centuries, public schools werethe main institution charged with teaching immigrant children the English language andassimilating them into American culture and values. 5 However, this process involved tradeoffs for
immigrant families, who were expected to surrender their heritage and language and even“Americanize” their names. There were also ample instances of bias against new immigrants anddiscrimination by the majority Protestant population against Catholics and other non-Protestantreligions. (This led the Catholic church to create a system of private parochial schools that grew inenrollments through the mid-1960s.)
5 http://www.civiced.org/pdfs/PrinzingDan.pdf

Center on Education Policy

www.cep-dc.org

6

Equity and Opportunity
Promoting equity for all became a preeminent mission of public schools in the mid-20th
century.
It took many decades and the force of civil rights legislation and court decisions before universal
access to public education matured into the full pursuit of equal educational opportunity for all
racial, ethnic, religious, and linguistic groups, as well as for girls and children with disabilities.
When Brown v. Board of Education declared state-sponsored segregation of public schools to beunconstitutional, public schools were placed in the vanguard of ensuring equity, at times amid
enormous backlash.
The federal government played an influential role in promoting educational equity.
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, the Individuals with Disabilities Act, andsubsequent federal legislation were instrumental in ensuring educational opportunity for children
from low-income and minority families, children with limited English proficiency, children withdisabilities, girls, and other groups.
After World War II, public schools gradually began to address other social needs, particularly
for poor children.
Encouraged by federal and state programs, schools began providing school lunch and breakfast to
children from low-income families, and many districts employed school nurses. In the later
decades of the 20th century, public schools offered other types of social services, such as beforeand after-school care, counseling, substance abuse prevention, and safety and violence
prevention. Some public schools became community hubs where children and their families could
access a range of services.

A Decentralized System
Authority for public education in the US is divided among the local, state, and federal levels.
As a result of this history and our approach to governance, the education system in the US is more
decentralized than in many other countries. Because the Constitution does not mention
education governance in particular, states have primary authority over education. States make key
decisions about the number of school days, academic content standards, testing, graduation,teacher certification, and much more, while passing on some authority to local districts andschool boards. As noted above, the federal government plays an influential but limited role.

Center on Education Policy

www.cep-dc.org

7

Consequently, authority for education in the US is spread across many different entities: 6♦♦♦

50 state systems plus the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and outlying territories
13,598 regular public school districts
98,158 public schools

About 47% of public school revenues come from the state level, 45% from the local level, and alittle more than 8% from the federal level. 7 This multilayered approach to governance complicatesefforts to achieve common nationwide missions.

An Incomplete Agenda
The goal for public education in the 21st century has shifted from providing access to ensuringthat all students receive a high-quality education.
Many schools are struggling to meet this goal of ensuring a high-quality education for all, andtheir efforts are complicated by challenges and changes unknown to earlier generations. The
reasons why public schools came into being—preparing people for jobs and citizenship, unifying adiverse population, and promoting equity, among others—remain relevant, even urgent. Publicschools reflect our values and influence our future. There are problems with public schools, to be
sure. Addressing these problems will require different strategies than in the past and a national
will to improve public education.

SourcesAnderson, James D. (1988.) The education of blacks in the South, 1860–1935. University of North
Carolina Press.
Center on Education Policy. (2007). Why we still need public schools: Public education for thecommon good. https://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=291
Center on Education Policy. (2011). Public schools and the original land grant program.
https://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=353
Kaestle, C. (1983). Pillars of the republic: Common schools and American society, 1780-1860. Hilland Wang.
Katznelson, I., & Weir, M. (1985). Schooling for all: Class, race, and the decline of the democratic
ideal. Basic Books.

Neem, J. N. (2017). Democracy’s schools: The rise of public education in America. Johns Hopkins
University Press.

6 National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics 2017, table 214.10.
7 National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics 2019, table 235.10.

Center on Education Policy

www.cep-dc.org

8

Pangle, T. L., & Pangle, L. S. (1993). The Learning of liberty: The educational ideas of the American
founders. University Press of Kansas.
Tyack, D., & Lowe, R. (1986, February). The Constitutional moment: Reconstruction and black
education in the South. American Journal of Education, 94(2), 236-256.
Vinovskis, M. A. (1992, January 1). Schooling and poor children in 19th-century America. American
Behavioral Scientist, 35(3), 313-331.

Credits
This report was written by Nancy Kober, editorial consultant for CEP, and Diane Stark Rentner,
deputy director of CEP, with advice from Maria Ferguson, CEP’s executive director.
Located in Washington, D.C., and founded in 1995, the Center on Education Policy at the George
Washington University is a national, independent source for research and information aboutpublic education. The Center helps Americans better understand the role of public education in a
democracy and the need to improve the academic quality of public schools. We do not represent
any special interests. Instead, we try to help citizens make sense of the conflicting opinions andperceptions about public education and create the conditions that will lead to better publicschools.
© 2020 Center on Education Policy. All rights reserved.

Center on Education Policy
The George Washington University
Graduate School of Education and Human
Development
2129 G Street, NW, #201A
Washington, DC 20052
Phone: (202) 994-9050
Email: cep-dc@cep-dc.org
www.cep-dc.org