GCOE Discussion Paper Series
Global COE Program

Human Behavior and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Discussion Paper No.201

Corporate Sports Activity and Work Morale:
Evidence from a Japanese Automobile Maker

Masaru Sasaki and Fumio Ohtake

June 2011

GCOE Secretariat
Graduate School of Economics

OSAKA UNIVERSITY

1-7 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-0043, Japan

Corporate Sports Activity and Work Morale:
Evidence from a Japanese Automobile Maker 

Masaru Sasaki †Fumio Ohtake ‡June 3, 2011

Abstract
This paper estimates the factors affecting the relationship between the wins and losses of corporate
sports club teams and the work morale of employees, using an original survey of employees from aselected Japanese automobile maker. We find that corporate sports club teams' performance is an
important factor influencing the work morale of older employees and employees who work withcolleagues belonging to those teams in the same division. We cannot say statistically that the impacts ofteams' wins and losses on changes in work morale at the individual level are symmetric, that is, the work
morale of employees is significantly raised by own teams’ wins but not necessarily reduced by own
teams’ losses.

Keywords: work morale, corporate sports, subjective well-being analysis, JapanThe authors are grateful to Kiyoshi Matsubara, Hideaki Murase, Tomohiko Noda, Yasuo Yamamoto,Kazuki Yokoyama, and participants in the 2006 spring meeting of the Japanese Economic Associationand in the seminar at Nagoya City University for their valuable comments. We also thank theperssonel department of the company that helped us collect the data and allowed us to use it for thisresearch. Any errors of course belong to us.
† Correspondence: Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University, 1-7, Machikaneyama,
Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-0043, Japan, E-mail:sasaki@econ.osaka-u.ac.jp‡ ISER, Osaka University, 6-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka, 567-0047, japan,
E-mail:ohtake@iser.osaka-u.ac.jp

1.

Introduction

This paper aims to identify factors that determine the links between work morale and theperformance of corporate sports club teams, using an original survey of employees of a selected

Japanese automobile maker.

There is a different system of fostering world-class athletes in Japan. Companies have hiredcompetitive athletes as employees while providing them with training environments. The majority ofJapanese Olympic athletes are employees belonging to sports club teams owned by companies. Saeki(2004) reported that 48% of athletes participating in the 2000 Sydney Olympics were from corporate

sports club teams. In general, they work with their colleagues for half a day and then spend theremaining half for training. It should be noted that they are not professional in the sense that their

payments are not determined by evaluation of their sports performance but mainly of their labor

performance, like ordinary workers. A number of major companies including Toyota, Tokyo Gas,

Mitsubishi Motors, Hitachi, Matsushita and so on own various sports clubs from baseball to Ekiden

marathon relay races (track & field) and Keirin bicycle racing in Japan, as is also the case with schools

and colleges supporting a variety of sports club activities such as American football, basketball, baseballand so on in the US.

Why do these companies own sports club teams? One of the reasons is that the good performanceof their teams is expected to encourage employees to work hard and to feel united. Corporate sports clubteams are considered as a symbol of unification. According to the survey conducted by the Ministry of

Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2001), 64.3% (out of 115 firms) responded that oneof the purposes to support corporate sports club teams was to unite employees and to boost their work
morale. 1

Although many Japanese companies have owned and supported sports club teams, the impact ofthese teams on employees' productivity or work morale has not been analyzed before. Is the work

morale of ordinary workers really influenced by the wins and losses of their corporate sports club teams?

If so, what types of employees are influenced? Although this paper has some drawbacks such as the useof subjective data and the limiting of the data from one firm, it is worthwhile explicitly andquantitatively to explore the link between the performance of corporate sports club teams and changes inwork morale, and to estimate factors that affect this link. The results may be helpful of providing

companies with guidelines on how to utilize corporate sports club teams for business strategies.

The company's personnel department and the authors collected original data from a leading

Japanese automobile maker during March 8-16, 2005 by directly asking a sample of employees about

how their work morale changes when selected corporate sports club teams win or lose. This analysis

picks up the following three teams owned by this company: Rugby football, baseball and Ekiden

1

Sasaki (2005) summarizes the trend of corporate sports in Japan.

marathon relay race (track & field). 2 The data contain various items of information on demographic andproductivity characteristics.

There is recent literature on subjective well-being (SWB) analysis that determines the extent ofhappiness (Di Tella, MacCulloch and Oswald 2001; Frey and Stutzer 2002; Alesina, Di Tella and

MacCulloch 2004; Ohtake 2004), job satisfaction (Clark 1997; Hamermesh 1977, 2001) and life
satisfaction (Wolfers 2003; Frijters, Haisken-DeNew and Shields 2004), using subjective data. 3 We need

to be aware that there have to be economic relationships between subjective independent variables andobjective explanatory variables in the estimations, as suggested by Hamermesh (2004).

Empirical results are summarized below. We cannot say statistically that the effect of age on work

morale of an employee is symmetric between wins and losses in that the work morale of older

employees is raised by wins of their own Rugby football, baseball and Ekiden marathon relay race (track& field) teams, but is, although insignificantly, reduced by losses of these teams. These results suggestthat competitive sports teams play an important role in raising the work morale of older employees.

To get to know colleagues belonging to one's own corporate sports club teams is a crucial factor

affecting work morale. An employee who works with at least one colleague in the same division

2

Ekiden marathon relay race is one of the most popular sports events. Races including individual

marathon races are often held and televised. There are many corporate track & field club teams
specializing in marathon and long-distance races in Japan.
3

Kahneman and Krueger (2006) discussed how to treat and interpret subjective measures of well-being.

They concluded that these measures represent respondents' perceptions of their behavior, but not theutility level obtained from their behavior.

belonging to the Rugby football team, the baseball team or the Ekiden marathon relay racing team hassignificantly increased work morale after wins of the respective team. However, the losses of acolleague's team (except in baseball) insignificantly reduce employees' work morale. Thus, we cannot

say statistically that the effect of having athletic colleagues is symmetric on the work morale ofindividual employees (except in baseball).

The next two sections of this paper introduce corporate sports activities in Japan and a simple

model with optimal choice of sports activity. Section 4 discusses our original survey of employees froma Japanese automobile maker. Section 5 presents estimated results. The final section provides concluding

remarks.

2.

Corporate Sports Activities in JapanWe define corporate sports activity as a sports program carried out for corporate athletes withfinancial and physical support from companies. Corporate athletes are usually given the status offull-time employees and attend games or tournaments as representatives of their companies. To be easily

understandable, corporate sports activity can be compared with college sports activity in the US. In theUS, college athletes are essentially not professionals, but students, combining study with sports activity.

In Japan, similarly, corporate athletes are not professionals, but employees, combining work with sports

activity. For example, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd., one of the leading electronics

manufacturers, owns several sports club teams: baseball, basketball, and volleyball. Mitsui Sumitomo

Insurance Co. Ltd. (MSIG), a major general insurance company, owns a women's track & field(Marathon and Ekiden marathon relay race) team and a women's judo team. Supporting sports clubteams and athletic employees is considered as one of corporate activities in Japan. 4

Corporate sports activity, like school sports activity, has made a great contribution to fostering

world-class competitive athletes in Japan. For example, 32 of 39 track and field athletes who

participated in the 2004 Athens Olympics were selected from corporate sports club teams, and five outof six were selected from corporate sports club teams in ski jumping for the 2006 Torino Olympic
Winter Games, according to data from the Japan Olympic Committee. 5 It is clear that Japanese athletes

would not have been competitive enough to advance to the Olympic Games without corporate support.

Corporate athletes have also served as reserve sources of professional players (in baseball in particular).

In fact, 25 out of 90 drafted players of professional baseball clubs were from corporate sports club teamsin the 2006 selection, according to Nippon Professional Baseball (NPB). 6 Corporate sports activity

provides many athletes with the opportunities and environments to continue sports activity after school.

4

Corporate sports club teams are active in Korea and Taiwan, too.

5

Of course, the proportion of corporate athletes depends on the type of sport. Thirteen out of 20

swimmers who were selected in the Athens Olympic Games were college or high school athletes.
Professional players were allowed to participate in baseball and men's soccer in the Olympic Games.
6

College graduates, high school graduates and corporate players are eligible to be drafted to the NPB.

Thirty-two out of 90 players were college graduates, and the rest were high school graduates in the 2006
selection.

The institutional structures for training athletes in Japan and the US are different: in the US,

athletes after graduating from high school or college have no way of continuing sports activity except as

professionals, finding sponsors to provide financial support. In Japan, there has not been a businessculture under which companies support professional athletes like the financial sponsorships (except inmajor sports such as soccer football, baseball and golf). Athletes who graduate from high school orcollege get a job in a company and join a corporate sports club team if they want to continue sports

activity.

Athletic employees are usually hired as full-time employees. Despite having the status of afull-time employee, athletic employees are allowed to work only for half a day and then to train
themselves for the remaining half. 7 After retiring from sports club teams, they usually stay in the same

companies and pursue their careers in business, like other employees. Retired athletes are not so

productive in the beginning, but are appreciated as potentially productive workers because they havespirit and endurance gained through hard training.

Dated back to the 1950s, the original purpose of supporting corporate sports activities was toprovide ordinary employees with opportunities to do sports for a change, which promoted workers'

health. It thus made a contribution to raising labor productivity by accumulating human capital (health)7

Rugby football, with its amateur spirit, is exceptional. Rugby football players in general work withother colleagues until closing time and then begin training, regardless of which team they belongto.

stocks and increasing work effort. In those days, when professional and college baseball and Sumo

wrestling were only mass entertainment sports, corporate sports leagues such as volleyball or football(soccer) were popular not only among employees but among local people of the area where thecorporate sports club teams were homed. Companies then took advantage of sports clubs as advertising

media, and they began to recruit competitive athletes from high schools and colleges to strengthen theirteams. Because of dramatic economic growth in the 1960s-70s, companies afforded to build more sports

club teams and to hire more competitive athletes. The 1964 Tokyo Olympics promoted companies tostrengthen their athletes because the companies’ name recognitions were increased if their athletesparticipated actively in the Olympics game.

In recent years, corporate sports activity has not been as strong as it used to be. A number ofcorporate sports club teams were disbanded during the severe economic slowdown in the 1990s after the

burst of the Bubble Economy. The Japanese Association of Amateur Baseball reported that the numberof corporate baseball club teams decreased from 142 in 1995 to 83 in 2005. There are other reasons why

corporate sports club teams were disbanded. Now that they can enjoy so many sports entertainments

such as MBL, NBA, Premier League on satellite broadcasting programs as well as Japanese professional

baseball and J. League (professional soccer football league in Japan), the Japanese viewers are not sointerested in the games of the corporate sports leagues as they used to be. This implies that corporate

sports club teams are not valued as advertising media.

The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) reported the detrimental effects of theelimination of corporate sports club teams in 2001. It warned that elimination of corporate sports clubteams leads to the worsening of sports competitiveness, a decline in junior club teams, and a decrease in

sports events, particularly in local areas.

Recently, the role of corporate sports activity has changed to fulfilling Corporate Social

Responsibility (CSR) to employees and neighborhoods. The companies abandon full support of sports

club teams, but instead share support of them with local governments and other companies at home.

Athletic employees are then changed to contracted employees from full-time employees, so they do notneed to work at all, but have to leave the company after they have retired as athletes. They are treated as

professional players. Corporate sports club teams start afresh as local-community-oriented club teams inthe sense that sports teams are not the private goods for employees, but the public goods for thecommunity on the one hand, and as professional club teams in the sense that players basically earn theirliving by showing their skills on the other hand. The Sakai Blazers, a men's volleyball team, is anappropriate example. It used to be one of the most competitive teams owned by Nippon Steel located at

Sakai, the southern part of Osaka. After the 2000 season, it became the community-based andprofessional volleyball team sponsored by a subsidiary corporation of Nippon Steel, other companies

and the local community.

Are corporate sports club teams really the burden for companies? It may be true that corporatesports club teams no longer serve as advertising media, but those teams are still expected to play a

crucial role in motivating employees to work as a symbol of unification. Good performance of sports

teams cheer employees up, which gives them more energy to work. We investigate the link between thework morale and performance of corporate sports club teams in the following sections.

3.

Model

This section develops a simple model with the optimal choice of investment into corporate sports

activities. We assume that for convenience, a firm owns one corporate sports club team and chooses the

optimal number of employees and the optimal amount of sport inputs. The firm faces the following

profit maximization problem:  F (e( p ( s ), X ) L)  wL  c( s)where e(p(s), X) represents efficiency unit of labor, L employees, w the exogenous wage, and X a vectorof the characteristics of employees. p(s) is the probability of own team’s winning and is positively

associated with the amount of sport inputs, s. If e(⋅,⋅) depends positively on p, employees are motivatedto work harder as own team wins games. F(⋅) is the production function with usual properties: F’(⋅)>0and F’’(⋅)<0, and c(s) is the cost function featured by c’(⋅)>0 and c’’(⋅)>0.

Taking a differential with respect to L and s yields:

F ' (e( p( s), X ) L)e( p( s), X )  w ,(1) e( p ( s ), X )  p ( s )  L  c' ( s ) .

p
(
s
)

 s and F ' (e( p ( s ), X ) L)(2)

Equation (1) shows a familiar property determining the number of employees such that the marginal

product of labor equals the wage. On the other hand, equation (2) indicates that the optimal sport inputs

are determined where the marginal product of sport input (MRs) equals its marginal cost. If own team’s
wins do not raise the efficiency unit of labor, that is, e/p=0, the firm has no incentive to invest into its
own team, so s*=0. If e/p >0, on the other hand, it is worthwhile for the firm to spend the money for

own team.

We now see how the characteristics of employees, X affects the determinant of sport inputs,

assuming a positive effect of winning on the efficiency unit of labor (e/p >0). Taking a differential of

the left-hand side of equation (2), that is, the marginal product of sports input (MRs) with respect to X

obtains:  2 e  p 
MRs  e  e   L .
  F ' ' ()   F ' ()
X X  p  pX  s 
(3)

The first term on the right-hand side of equation (3) represents the compensation effect. If e/p >0, an

increase in X shifts the MRs curve to the left, leading to lower sport inputs, s. In contrast, the second

term is the indirect effect throughout the marginal efficiency unit of labor by the probability of winning.
If 2e/pX >0, that is, if the marginal efficiency unit of labor by the probability of winning increases inX, the MRs curve is shifted to the right, thus raising the optimal level of sport inputs. In this case, theoverall effect of increasing X on s is ambiguous. If the second term dominates the first one, the firmshould increase sports inputs, s in response to an increase in X. However, if 2e/pX <0, because thesign of the second term turns out to be negative, the overall effect is unambiguously negative. Therefore,

the firm cuts sports inputs, s in response to an increase in X.

It is logical to assume that age represents one of the vectors of employee characteristics, X. Because

older employees devote longer periods to working for the company and have stronger loyalty to thecompany, the efficiency unit of labor, e(p(s),X), rises in age, that is, e(p(s), X)/ X>0, thus shifting MRs

to the left. In addition, because those older employees have stronger loyalty to their own corporate sports

club team as well, the marginal efficiency unit of labor with respect to the probability of winning,e(p(s),X)/p(s), increases in age, that is, 2e(p(s),X)/p(s)X>0, shifting MRs to the right. The work

morale of older employees is increasingly raised by own team’s wins, which thus leads to productivity

improvement. In this case, whether or not to invest more in sport activity is not determined as employees

are older.

This paper does not discuss whether or not to invest more in sports activities and does not estimate

how much to increase or decrease investments in corporate sports activities, but rather explores thesecond term on the right-hand side of equation (3): in practice, identifying who in the corporation ismotivated to work hard by own teams’ wins, and simultaneously, who is not. This empirical study

focuses on which factors in X affect the marginal efficiency unit of labor by the probability of winning,e(p(s),X)/p(s). We test the null hypothesis 2e(p(s),X)/p(s)X = 0. We cover only the effect of thesecond term, but it may be a good start to investigate the role of corporate sports club teams.

3.

Data

Our original survey of employees from a selected Japanese company was conducted during March

8-16, 2005 by the company's personnel department and the authors. This company is one of the leading

automobile makers in the world and is listed on the first section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. It is oneof the most representative corporations in Japan. The survey covers 1,550 employees from theheadquarters, two branch offices, one research division and 12 factories, 89% of whom responded to thequestionnaire. This corporation has 35 active sports teams, five of which are designated as special clubteams. They are baseball, Rugby football, track and field (Ekiden marathon relay race), men's basketball

and women's basketball. These five sports' teams receive substantial financial support from the company,

and the company relies on these club teams to win league matches and tournaments during the season.

These club teams have been successful in each league and have trained excellent athletes.

The survey focuses on the effects on work morale in the five sports types mentioned above. In thisstudy, we restrict ourselves to the link between work morale and the performance of Rugby football,

baseball and track& field (Ekiden marathon relay race) teams. These teams were competitive in eachleague or in tournaments and were popular among employees for a long time before the conducted date.

We do not use data on men's or women's basketball because there are many missing variables.

The survey asked sampled employees about subjective changes in their work morale byrecognizing wins or losses by their own corporate sports club teams. Recently, there has been someliterature on work morale in the subjective well-being (SWB) analysis. Bewley (1999) tested for

downward wage rigidity, using his original survey. He found that a wage cut reduces work morale andhence production, but that a wage rise increases work morale although its range is not as great as therange of a work morale decline due to a wage cut. Kawaguchi and Ohtake (2004) and Smith (2002) also

tested for the effect of a wage cut on work morale and explored the cause of nominal wage rigidity.

Ohtake and Karato (2003) and Ohta and Ohtake (2001) analyzed how work morale is influenced by the

introduction of a pay-per-performance system adopted by many Japanese companies in recent years.

Here, the survey asked employees to answer the following question for each sport: "How does yourwork morale change when your own team wins a game?". We construct the dichotomous variableindicating 1 if the employee chooses "increase moderately" or "increase" in response to the question and
0 if the employee chooses “neither”, “not increase moderately” or “not increases”. 8 It should be notedthat the dichotomous variable is not the one indicating the level of employees' work morale, but thechange of their work morale when their own corporate sports club teams win. In other words, it

represents not whether the work morale of employees is at a high level or at a low level, but whether or

8

Conversion to the dichotomous variable enables us to estimate qualitative model (probit and logit
models).

not their work morale rises when their own teams win.

Conversely, the survey also asked employees the question of how their work morale changed

when their own club teams lost. In a similar manner, the dichotomous variable is constructed indicating

1 if the employee responds “decrease” or “decreases moderately” and 0 if the employee responds“neither”, “not decrease moderately” or “not decrease”. It is the variable indicating whether or not work

morale of employees declines when their own teams lose.

These two-sided questions about increases and decreases in work morale enable us to identify

consistently how employees' work morale responds to the performance of the sports club teams. The

merit of conducting separate surveys for wins and losses is to investigate whether or not the effects onwork morale are symmetric between wins and losses. They are not necessarily symmetric. If employees

have a prejudice in favor of their own company and its teams, they are delighted at wins, which raises

work morale when teams win, and they are generous toward losses, which does not reduce theirmotivation to work even though teams lose. This survey makes a contribution to measuring directly how

employees' work morale changes by use of subjective data.

Table 1 summarizes the definitions of variables, and Table 2 shows data descriptions of the link

between work morale and own teams' performance. The work morale of employees responded more to

wins of the Rugby football team, the baseball team and the Ekiden marathon relay team than to losses ofthese teams. That is, employees' work morale is raised by own teams' wins more than it declines from

losses. Therefore, the effects of club teams’ performance on work morale are not symmetric between

wins and losses. This result implies that employees have an attachment to their teams so they aredelighted at wins, but generous toward losses. The change of work morale by the outcomes of games,

regardless of wins or losses, is larger for Rugby football and baseball than for Ekiden marathon relay

race. Employees are more concerned about the outcomes of games of the Rugby football team and thebaseball team than those of the Ekiden marathon relay racing team in this corporation. There appears to

be little difference between blue-collar and white-collar employees' changes of work morale as a resultof their own teams' outcomes of games.

【Table 1 is located here.】【Table 2 is located here. 】

Attention is restricted to the following factors affecting the work morale of employees when own

corporate sports club teams perform well or poorly: gender, age, occupational ranking, job types,

experience of any sports, experience of Rugby football, baseball or track & field, and whether or notthey work with colleagues who are corporate athletes. It is expected that these factors are significantly

correlated with the link between work morale changes and wins or losses by employees' own corporate

sports club teams. A win by one's own team raises the work morale of male employees, who are

generally more interested in sports than female employees, and the work morale of older employees andhigh-ranked employees, who are generally more loyal to their company. In the case of a loss, their work

morale is correspondingly lowered. Employees who have had experience of any sports, Rugby football,

baseball, and track & field in particular, are in turn the most happy or sad at the outcome of games

involving their teams. It is easily predicted that their work morale is raised by their teams' wins, but

lowered by their losses.

From the survey, employees were asked for each sport: "Do you have at least one colleague who

belongs to a special sports club team?" If they answered yes, it means that the respondent has at least

one athletic colleague. It is expected that their colleague's good performance puts the respondent on his

or her mettle. Otherwise, employees are not necessarily influenced by the performance of their own

teams. In cases where employees have at least one athletic colleague, their work morale is boosted byknowing that their colleagues play hard and their teams are winning. The definitions of the explanatory

variables are in Table 1, and summary statistics are in Table 3.

【Table 3 is located here.】

We employ the univariate probit model to estimate the factors that affect the link between work

morale and wins and losses by corporate sports club teams for selected sports (Rugby, baseball, andtrack & field(Ekiden marathon relay race)).

4.

Results

We begin to identify factors affecting the link between an increase in individual work morale andwins by the selected three sports club teams. Table 4 displays the estimated results of each sport forblue-collar employees, white-collar employees and both.

【Table 4 is located here.】

As one would expect, the coefficients on age are significantly positive in the estimates of the three

sports. Older employees' work morale is boosted when the Rugby football team, the baseball team andthe Ekiden marathon relay racing team win games or tournaments. Our predictions are supported thatolder employees are more loyal to their company than young ones, so wins by own teams are more

likely to encourage them to work hard. The same results appear when the sample is limited to blue-collar

employees. However, age is insignificant in the estimates for white-collar employees.

Whether or not employees work with at least one colleague belonging to corporate sports clubteams in the same division is an important factor affecting their work morale. The coefficients on having

colleagues are positively significant in the estimates of all the sports. For employees who work with atleast one colleague in the same division belonging to the Rugby football team, the baseball team, or the

Ekiden marathon relay racing team, their work morale increased with wins by the corresponding team.

The colleague's good performance and wins impress employees of the same division, thereby inducing

them to work harder. The same results are obtained for blue-collar employees in the three sports.

However, the effects disappear for white-collar employees in Rugby football and Ekiden marathon relay

race. Blue-collar employees are encouraged to work harder by their colleagues' performances and theirteams' wins.

We test another side of the coin, the link between declining work morale of individual employees

and losses by their teams to confirm whether or not the results are symmetric with those cited above.

Table 5 displays the estimated results of each sport for blue-collar employees, white-collar employees

and both. Because we cannot reject the null hypothesis that all the coefficients are zero in the estimatesof the three sports for the white-collar employees according to the log likelihood test, the estimates forthe white-collar employees are ignored here although the results are displayed in Table 5.

【Table 5 is located here.】Age is insignificant for the relationship between losses by all the sports teams and declining work

morale. However, when the sample is limited to blue-collar employees, age becomes 10% significantly

positive for Rugby football and baseball. Combined with the result from the effects of wins, we cannot

say statistically that the effect of age on work morale is symmetric between wins and losses, but instead

the effect of age on work morale of blue-collar employees is symmetric in the sense that the work

morale of older blue-collar employees is raised by wins by the Rugby football team and the baseballteam, but declines with losses by these teams. Older blue-collar employees are in turn happy or sad at

wins or losses by the Rugby football and the baseball teams. We conclude that these club teams play animportant role in raising the work morale of older blue-collar employees as an incentive device,although the team has to be a strong contender.

The effects of other variables are not symmetric for the relationship between work morale and theperformance of own corporate sports club teams. The coefficients on experience in any sport are

positively significant in the estimates of baseball and Ekiden marathon replay racing team, and when thesample is limited to blue-collar employees, the coefficients are significantly positive in the three sports

including Rugby football. Employees who have played or are playing any sport, regardless of the type,are discouraged from working hard by losses by their own teams.

The coefficients on the blue-collar employees and the white-collar employees are significantly

positive for the relationship between declining work morale and teams' losses. These results imply thatlosses by own teams lead to the work morale decline in both blue-collar employees and white-collar

employees. It is interpreted that both blue-collar and white-collar employees have a strong sense of

belonging to the corporation. However, compared with the results from Table 4, an increase in work

morale by teams' wins is not statistically different by job types.

The coefficients on athlete colleagues are insignificantly different from zero in all sports types.

Compared with the results from Table 4, an interesting point is that employees who have at least one

athlete colleague are encouraged by wins by the colleague's club team, but their work morale does notnecessarily decline following a loss. Employees who work with athlete colleagues are generous toward

the colleague's loss.

5.

Concluding Remarks

This paper estimated factors determining the relationship between wins and losses by corporate

sports club teams and the work morale of employees, using an original survey of employees from aselected Japanese automobile maker.

We find that corporate sports club teams are a symbol of unification in the corporation and play arole in improving the team spirit and solidarity that are important factors in the manufacturing sector.

The corporate sports club teams' performance influences the work morale of older employees and those

who work with colleagues belonging to corporate sports club teams in the same division. These

employees are motivated to work harder by knowing that their own teams win, but they are notnecessarily discouraged from working hard if their own teams lose games. We cannot conclude

statistically that the impact of teams' performance on work morale at the individual level is symmetricbetween wins and losses.

Finally, we briefly address policy implications of corporate sports club teams. How do companies

use corporate sports club teams? They can be used as a useful incentive device to encourage employees

to work hard and to improve solidarity and team spirit in the company on the condition that the teams

are strong contenders. At the economy level, there is an externality in that a win by one team necessarily

leads to a loss by another team. Therefore, it may not necessarily be a good idea to have corporate sports

club teams. However, as shown in Table 2, employees' work morale is raised by own teams' wins morethan it declines from losses. These results imply that this company's employees are delighted at wins but

are generous toward losses. If employees in all companies are like those in this company, it is beneficial

to have corporate sports club teams and to organize leagues at the economy level.

Here, we have just focused attention on one aspect of roles of corporate sports club teams, that is,

the effect on work morale of employees. From our estimated results, we conclude that it is worthwhile toobtain corporate sports club teams to help raise the work morale of employees. However, it is remindedthat companies expect sports clubs to operate as advertising media. Because the Japanese viewers do not

pay much attention on corporate sports leagues as they used to do, corporate sports clubs cannot bemuch workable as advertising devices. Combined to severe economic recession in the 1990s andincreased costs of maintaining teams, many corporate sports club teams have been disdained.

It should be reminded that we surveyed a specific firm in this study, so the results are not general.

However, this paper contributes to an understanding of the role of corporate sports club teams in theJapanese economy.

References:

Alesina, A., R. Di Tella, and R. MacCulloch. 2004. Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans andAmericans Different? Journal of Public Economics 88(9-10): 2009 - 42.

Bewley, T. F. 1999. Why wages don't fall during a recession? Cambridge, MT: Harvard University

Press.

Clark, A. 1997. Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work? Labour Economics 4(4):341-72.

Di Tella, R., R. MacCulloch, and A. Oswald. 2001. Preferences over inflation and unemployment:

Evidence from surveys of happiness. America Economic Review 91(1):335-41.

Frey, B., and A. Stutzer. 2002. What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research? Journal of

Economic Literature 40(2): 402- 35.

Frijters, P., J. P. Haisken-DeNew, and M. A. Shields. 2004. Investigating the Patterns and Determinantsof Life Satisfaction in Germany Following Reunification. Journal of Human Resources 39(3): 649-74.

Hamermesh, D. S. 1977. Economic aspects of job satisfaction. Essay in labor market and population

analysis, edited by O. Ashenfelter and W. Oates. New York, NY: J. Wiley & Sons: 53-72.

Hamermesh, D. S. 2001. The Changing Distribution of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Human Resources

36(1): 1-30.

Hamermesh, D. S. 2004. Subjective Outcomes in Economics. Southern Economic Journal 71(1): 2-11.

Kahneman, D., and A. B. Krueger. 2006. Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being.

Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(1): 3-24.

Kawaguchi, D., and F. Ohtake. 2004. Testing the Morale Theory of Nominal Wage Rigidity. Osaka

University Discussion Paper No. 602.

Ohta, S., and F. Ohtake. 2003. Kigyou Sechou to Roudou Iyoku. Financial Review 63: 4-34 (inJapanese).

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. 2001. Nippon no mirai wosasaeru kigyou to supotsu no paatoshippu wo motomete (in Japanese)

http://www.douwashoin.jp/04%20Information/details-kigyousports.htm.

The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan. 2001. kigyou spoutsu konndannkai houkokusho(in Japanese)

http://www.meti.go.jp/report/data/g11122aj.html.

Ohtake, F. 2004. Unemployment and Happiness. The Japanese Journal of labour Studies. 528: 59-68 (inJapanese).

Ohtake, F., and Karato, H. 2003. The Effects of Performance Pay on Work Motivation. The Economic

Review 54(3): 193-205.

Saeki, T. 2004. Gendai Kigyo Supo-tsu Riron (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Fumai Press.

Sasaki, Masaru. 2005. Is it of Value for Firms to Own Sports Club Teams? The Japanese Journal oflabour Studies 537: 46-48 (in Japanese).

Smith, J. C. 2002. Pay Cuts and Morale: A Test of Downward Nominal Rigidity. Warwick Economic

Research Papers No. 649.

Wolfers, J. 2003. Is Business Cycle Volatility Costly? Evidence from Surveys of Subjective Well-being.

International Finance 6: 1-26.

Table 1: Definitions of the Variables
Dependent Variables
morale rise

=1 if an employee's work morale increases by corporate sports teams' wins.
=0 if an employee's work morale does not increase by corporate sports=0 if an employee does not feel that work morale of the division increases
by corporate sports teams' wins.

morale decline=1 if an employee's work morale decreases by corporate sports teams' losses.
=0 if an employee's work morale does not decrease by corporate sports
teams' losses.

Explanatory Variables
gender=1 female employee, =0 male employee

age

employee's age

Rank (1)=1 if an employee is the director, =0 otherwise.

Rank (2)=1 if an employee is the section head, =0 otherwise.

Rank (3)=1 if an employee is the upper level employee, =0 otherwise.

Rank (4)=1 if an employee is the lower level employee, =0 otherwise.

Blue Collar=1 if an employee is the blue-collar employee, =0 otherwise.

White Collar=1 if an employee is the while-collar employee, =0 otherwise

Other Collar=1 if an employee is the other-collar employee, =0 otherwise

Any Sports Experience=1 if an employee has played or is playing any sports, =0 otherwise

Each Sports Experience=1 if an employee has played or is playing Rugby football, baseballor track and field, =0 otherwise

Colleague=1 if an employee has at least one colleague belonging to corporate sports
club teams in the same division (Rugby football, baseball, or track & field).
=0 otherwise

Table 2: Work Morale and Corporate Sports Club Teams' Performancework morale rise

Overallby teams' wins
Blue-Collar
White-Collar
work morale decline

Overallby teams' losses
Blue-Collar
White-Collar

Rugby football

baseballtrack and field

0.319

0.283

0.255

(0.466)(0.451)(0.436)

0.306

0.282

0.239

(0.461)(0.450)(0.426)

0.340

0.281

0.201

(0.474)(0.450)(0.401)

0.103

0.101

0.069

(0.303)(0.301)(0.253)

0.112

0.110

0.077

(0.316)(0.312)(0.267)

0.079

0.079

0.050

(0.269)(0.270)(0.218)

Numbers without parentheses are mean values.
Numbers in parentheses are standard errors.

27

Table 3: Summary Statistics of Explanatory Variables
Explanatory Variables

Mean

Standard ErrorObs

gender

0.149

0.356

1347

age

37.89

10.82

1340

Rank (1)

0.014

0.112

1327

Rank (2)

0.166

0.372

1327

Rank (3)

0.457

0.498

1327

Rank (4)

0.362

0.481

1327

Blue Collar

0.689

0.463

1343

White Collar

0.308

0.462

1343

Other Collar

0.004

0.061

1343

Any Sports Experience

0.781

0.414

1398

Sports Experience (Rugby football)

0.029

0.169

1398

Sports Experience (baseball)

0.215

0.411

1398

Sports Experience (track & field)

0.124

0.330

1398

Colleague (Rugby)

0.118

0.323

1276

Colleague (baseball)

0.102

0.303

1272

Colleague (track & field)

0.040

0.195

1265

28

Table 4: The Link between an Increase in Work Morale and Wins of Corporate Sports Teams
Probit Estimation

genderage

Rugby Football

Baseball

Total

Blue Collar

White Collar-0.059-0.148-0.163(0.057)(0.118)

0.007

***

0.007

***

Total

Blue Collar

0.00005(0.096)(0.059)

0.004

0.006

(0.004)(0.002)(0.002)-0.062

0.081

-

*

***

Track & Field
White Collar

Total-0.115-0.052-0.093(0.122)(0.097)(0.043)

0.000

0.006

(0.004)(0.002)0.121-0.177

0.008

***

**
***

Blue Collar

White Collar-0.069-0.094(0.116)(0.080)

0.008

***

(0.002)(0.002)0.016-(0.126)(-)(0.160)(0.132)(-)(0.187)(0.036)

(-)

(-)

0.071

0.106

-0.032

0.106

0.073

0.126

-0.004-0.0390.053(0.070)(0.093)(0.128)(0.070)(0.090)(0.128)(0.059)(0.069)(0.112)

0.008

0.010

-0.081

0.004-0.006-0.054-0.008-0.0570.083(0.043)(0.048)(0.094)(0.041)(0.047)(0.092)(0.037)(0.045)(0.097)-0.380---0.361---0.212--(0.258)(-)(-)(0.258)(-)(-)(0.273)(-)(-)-0.288---0.310---0.141--(0.190)(-)(-)(0.165)(-)(-)(0.191)(-)(-)

Any Sports

0.015

0.059

-0.067

0.038

0.075

-0.041

0.023

0.025

0.020

Experience(0.035)(0.040)(0.070)(0.034)(0.039)(0.067)(0.031)(0.037)(0.058)Each Sports

0.112

0.045

0.294

0.023

0.035

-0.031

0.104

Experience(0.083)(0.091)(0.169)(0.033)(0.037)(0.069)(0.041)

Rank (1)
Rank (2)
Rank (3)Blue Collar
White Collar

***

0.227

(a)

***

*

***

0.210

(a)

**

***

0.136

**

0.111

(0.002)

0.002

**

***

-

0.111

(0.003)(a)***(0.047)
*

0.129

-

0.116
(0.094)

Colleague

0.144

0.065

0.177

of Each sports(0.046)(0.073)(0.060)(0.048)(0.068)(0.067)(0.073)(0.082)*(0.205)0.127

Predicted Prob.

0.314

0.301

0.340

0.271

0.264

0.276

0.211

0.219

0.198

LR Chi Square

74.11

61.59

20.46

66.03

55.01

17.91

54.27

38.60

18.39

LR test

0.000

0.000

0.009

0.000

0.000

0.022

0.000

0.000

0.010

Pseudo R2

0.046

0.060

0.042

0.046

0.056

0.040

0.045

0.046

0.053

Sample

1228

845

379

1220

839

377

1171

804

348

*** 1%, ** 5%, * 10% significant. Numbers in parentheses are standard errors. The coefficients represent the change in the probability for an infinitesmal change of eachexplanatory variable. (a) There are no blue-collar employees in Rank (1). (b) The dummy variable is dropped because it is not varied over the dependent variable.
29(b)Table 5: The Link between a Decrease in Work Morale and Losses of Corporate Sports Teams
Probit Estimation

genderage
Rank (1)
Rank (2)

Rugby Football
Total

Blue Collar

0.025

-

(0.045)

(-)

0.002

0.003

(0.001)(0.002)0.027-(0.096)

(-)

(b)
*
(a)

White Collar

Total

Blue Collar-0.0190.030-(0.057)(0.045)(-)-0.001

0.002

0.002

(0.002)(0.001)(0.001)

0.017

0.006

-

(0.109)(0.084)(-)

Track & Field
White Collar
(b)
*
(a)

Total

Blue Collar

White Collar-0.0430.002--0.026(0.056)(0.035)(-)(0.048)-0.002

0.002

0.002

-0.0003(0.002)(0.001)(0.001)(0.002)-0.010-(0.085)

(-)

(b)

-

(a)

(-)

-

0.051

0.129

-0.019

0.030

0.103

-0.043

0.016

0.061

-0.019(0.084)(0.069)(0.047)(0.080)(0.063)(0.040)(0.069)(0.058)

0.018

0.016

-0.010

0.011

0.016

-0.041

0.002

0.002

-0.009(0.028)(0.033)(0.055)(0.027)(0.032)(0.043)(0.023)(0.028)(0.047)

***

-

-

0.577

-

-

0.478 ***--

(0.042) ***

(-)

(-)

(0.044)(-)(-)(0.049)

(-)

(-)

0.961

-

-

0.965

-

-

0.955 ***--

(0.017)(-)(-)(0.016)(-)(-)(0.023)(-)(-)

Any Sports

0.034

0.048

0.017

0.047

0.036

0.037 *

0.046

Experience(0.020)(0.024)(0.035)(0.019)(0.024)(0.032)(0.016)(0.020)(0.030)Each Sports

0.070

0.012

0.236

0.030

0.027

0.020

0.032

0.040

0.008

Experience(0.061)(0.062)(0.158)(0.022)(0.026)(0.046)(0.025)(0.030)(0.047)

Colleague

0.042

0.023

0.035

0.083

0.069

0.081

-0.0020.005-

of Each sports(0.031)(0.045)(0.036)(0.035)(0.049)(0.045)(0.035)(0.043)(-)

Predicted Prob.

0.105

0.118

0.082

0.094

0.105

0.074

0.074

0.083

0.057

LR Chi Square

23.63

22.91

6.79

26.94

25.19

8.76

15.78

15.72

1.12

LR test

0.009

0.001

0.560

0.003

0.000

0.363

0.072

0.015

0.981

Pseudo R2

0.029

0.038

0.032

0.033

0.043

0.041

0.025

34

0.007

Sample

1227

829

379

1221

825

377

1181

810

348

Blue Collar
White Collar

0.579

*

**

***
***
**

0.059

***

**

**

*

0.024

*** 1%, ** 5%, * 10% significant. Numbers in parentheses are standard errors. The coefficients represent the change in the probability for an infinitesmal change of eachexplanatory variable. (a) There are no blue-collar employees in Rank (1). (b) The dummy variable is dropped because they are not varied over the dependent variable.

30

(b)

(-)

(0.051)
Rank (3)*Baseball(b)