DP2017-J03

地域間介護給付水準の収束仮説の検証―保険者別データによる地域差変遷の把握―
松岡佑和2017 年 1 月 27 日

-*

**

4674!

4!

54454445aa4.

β

544!

5β5!

4445β

44β

5((2008)41(2006)4β))(2016a)ββ54(2009)44β((2016a)

455445*4194–**-74165(a(2014))5444544454
450.81%4(58.2%4(2010))55aa542(2016b)

54(2016b)

4445444454Baumol(1986)4Barro and Sala-i-Martin(1β992a)

" !

"

5
14!
(4)

5Baumol(1986)4Barro and Sala-i-Martin(1992a,b)4Sala-i-Marting(1996)

4Annala(2003)4Skidmore an

4d Deller(2008)

4Nixon(1999)4Hitiris and Nixon(2001)

EU

4Wang(2009)
542006-13)!

4(2016a)5a(4a4β5!

4

545!
45a4

4

52(!
2)

43

4!

44

55

a52(1)

4

4

4

4
5

1

44

4

5

4Barro4Sala-i-Martin!

!

5aβ4(2016a)

5β

445(2)$
1!

4(4)5Nixon(1999)4Hitiris and Nixon(2001)4Wang(2009)
4154(Baumol(1986) 4 Sala-i-Martin(1996) 4
Hitiris and Nixon(2001)4Wang(2009))5%&,()* − %&,( = -& + /( + !%&,( + $01,2 + 3&,(/%&,(1445

4/((6&,()4-&

401,24!4 $(43&,()%&,(5!

!

5a!

4

4

5

5

4

a5!
4

4

4
2log(1 + <)

a55!

4(1)

4!
54<!

4

5
23<

5%&,()* − %&,( = >?@!

6&,()*= log(1 +6&,(/4%&,(51.

)≈β520/1(2006,2013!
)51

20062013/2006

11β142006

42006

45242013(2006-1355(3)β424β4545β(Besley and Case(1995))5(2016a)

β45β44β24β

5Fingleton and Lopez-Bazo(2006)4Ertur et al.(2006)4Dell’erba and Gallo(2008)2β

5β

4B2 (143611)

4C(143611436))

βSDM(Spatial Durbin Model)

4D 2 (14361 j )4

5

B2 = ECB2 + D 2 $+CD 2 F + G2 + H + I(β()

4β
54(2)

544

B2 4D 2 4H4I(544 3&,(5/(4 !J

β4-&5Eβ!

55B2)K − B2 = EC B2)K − B2 + !B2 + D 2 $+LCB2 + CD 2 F + G2 + H + I((1)

(B2 )

B2 ))

4(3)

2.

((B2)K − B2 )

4 (2)(CB2 )(C(B2)K −4(1)-(3)

5)

24(1)

4245445(2)45(3)

44445)

4SDM(=SAR4SEM4SAC
Lee and Yu(2010)

5et.al(2013)

βBelotti,

Stata

5(4)

$
4Quah(1993)
4!

55Quah(1993)"

4544445Quah(1993)

4"

445!

44(3)

4555aβ453
2006-131436×88965

55544

14(55)

4()v

45a452551

44544452

44454544445(755/65)

a45a(453)((2006-13)

())

44

45
-(553)4()

54(/)

544
1436(1398520065a3816692013)

41579

54 2006-13

55
14-(2012-14 )(65)(2000-02 )1(2009-11 ) 20%()

14 29%
2
17%4 2

4(40(2003-5 )14((2008))56950%65)
18%4 3 (2006-854 21%)19%4()14!
155

1.

4(1)

$(!

)

5B2)K − B2 = EC(B2)K − B2 ) + !B2 + D 2 $+LCB2 + CD 2 F + G2 + H + I(B2 4D 2 4H4 I(4(D 2 )534,544-&4$(1)

4

1,25B244(43&,(4B2β4 CB2)4(!

)

5/(!

4EβLββ

2006-135454information criteria)
54AIC(Akaikeβ444
5

2.

(SDM)

252

54!

55β4β

45(SAR4SEM4SAC)

4SDM(AIC)4SDM(6/8)5a4

cluster-robust

βHausman

Robsut-Hausman

4(Hoechle(2007))552006-1389714)(4!

//β5145a2!

4β551

5β444444562Revelli(2006)4(2009)44β4545%&,()* = $01,2(2015)a1

445%&,()* = ! ∗ %&,( + $01,24 ! ≡ !∗ − 1%&,(25%&,()* − %&,( = !%&,( + $01,2OℎQRQ ! ≡ ! ∗ − 1(2)55C()
85()54

6* = E(O*,S 6S + O*,T 6T )6S = E(OS,* 6* + OS,T 6T )6T = E(OT,* 6* + OT,S 6S )E4O&,J45045E(4O&,J)

O&,Jsβ454a5aβ

44a5Hayashi and Yamamoto(2014)
2008-1052005

44454(2006β)(ββ4)5a45(3)SAR

B2 = ECB2 + D 2 $+G2 + H + I(SEM

B2 = D 2 $+G2 + H1 + UCV( + W(SAC

B2 = ECB2 + D 2 $+G2 + H1 + UCV( + W(SDM

B2 = ECB2 + D 2 $+CD 2 F + G2 + H + I(SAR

β5SEM
45SAC

SAR4SEM

5SDM

βSDM

β5SAR4SEM
45SDM
aβSAC

5SDM
4SAC

4β44β49ββ4510Annala, C. Have State and Local Fiscal Policies Become More Alike? Evidence of Beta
Convergence among Fiscal Policy Variables. Public Finance Review 2003

31(2)144-165
Barro, R.J., and Sala-i-Martin, X. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 1992a100223-251

Barro, R.J., and Sala-i-Martin, X. Regional Growth and Migration: A Japan-UnitedStates Compariosn. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 1992b6312-346
Belotti, F., Hughes, G., and Mortari, A.P. xsmle – A Command to Estimate Spatial
Panel Models in Stata.

Statistical Software Components. 2013

Besley, T. and Case, A.C. Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, andYardstick Competition. American Economic Review, 1995

85(1)

25-45

Baumol, W. J. Productivity Growth, Convergence and Welfare: What the Long-run
Data Show. American Economic Review 1986

85

1072-1085

Dell’erba, S., and Gallo, J. Regional Convergence and the Impact of European
Structural Funds over 1989-1999: A Spatial Econometric Analysis. Papers in RegionalScience 2008

87(2)219-244

Ertur, C., Gallo, J., and Baumont, C. The European Regional Convergence Process,1980-1995: Do Spatial Regimes and Spatial Dependence Matter? InternationalRegional Science Review 2006

29(1)Fingleton, B., and Lopez-Bazo, E.
Papers in Regional Science 2006

3-34
Empirical Growth Models with Spatial Effects.

85(2)177-198

Hitiris, T., and Nixon, J. Convergence of Health Care Expenditure in the EU Countries.
Applied Economics Letters 2001

8223-228

Hoechle, D. Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions with Cross-Sectional
Dependence. Stata Journal 2007

7(3)281-312

Hayashi, M., Yamamoto, W. Information Sharing, Neighborhood Demarcation andYardstick Competition: An Empirical Analysis of Intergovernmental Expenditure
Interaction in Japan. International Tax Public Finance 2016

forthcoming

Lee, L. and Yu, J. Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Panel Data Models with FixedEffects. Journal of Econometrics 2010

154(2)

165-185

Nixon, J. Convergence Analysis of Health Care Expenditure in the EU Countries Using
Two Approaches. working paper University of York 1999.
Quah, D. Empirical Cross-section Dynamics in Economic Growth. European Economic
Review, 1993

37426-434
11Revelli, F. Performance Rating and Yardstick Competition in Social Service Provision.
Jounal of Public Economics 2006

90 (3)

459–475

Sala-i-Martin, X. Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth andConvergence. European Economic Review 1996

401325-1352

Skidmore, M., and Deller, S. Is Local Government Spending Converging? Eastern
Economic Journal 2008

3441-55.

Wang, Z. The Convergence of Health Care Expenditure in the US States. HealthEconomics 2009

1855-70.

.

2008 44×94-109.

. (http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/shakai

hoshoukaikaku/wg_dai1/siryou4-3.pdf, 201523) 2014.

.

β2010.
.
2015

×52

45-69.

3
2016a51(34)×381-396.

.

2016b.

β2009

55(3)

206-222.
2006

.
80

187-2031227(2)100-116.

1.
 
2006/2013
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
01

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

-0.05
-0.1


/ log/ log

2006



(2006)2013(((2006log(1 + ') ≈ ')(1/2.

()

x 1. a\t{
4&3.300
25.95050.882

W|4&U / y(uU

D@4&U / y(uU

6{4&U / y(uUY?)

4.852
1.662
31.900
9;4&U / y(uUYC)

24.2292.790
1.583
16.511ah*E(1)6{10.9413.044.003

G:(2)D@
11.048
1.561

4&U / y(uU

(3)W|
2.239

4&U(y(uU)(4)9;Bo

(6)D@

(5)6{

28.126

9.935

15.240

5.099

1.440

1.389

1.230

3.625

6.214

1.740

2.694

216.100

56.36322.06332.191

9;4&U / 9;2kuU

W|4&U / W|2kuU

D@4&U / D@2kuU

6{4&U / 6{2kuU

4&U / 2kuU(7)W|
22.993

4&U(2kuU)(8)9;Boz#J 3 36

z#J 1,2 36

zTS36

PMc36()PMc36(')

L[u36.041

.024

.058

.039

.336

.316

.514

40492.25.010.005.012

.016

.085

.104.069

0199.017.006.018

0.046.095

.293

.186

.782

788968.612.226.397

.528

.647

.744.759

$ / y(uU (10#(V5- / y(uU (10y(uU

z#J(4,5 36)}AuU / y(uU

z#J(3 36)}AuU / y(uU

z#J(1,2 36)}AuU / y(uUzTS}AuU / y(uUy(uU(PM) / y(uUy(uU('PM) / y(uU

75 b%! / 65 b%!

djz#J 4,5 36
18289.22.075

0h,< / y(uU (10>Uy(uU*.463.0082.675/)>U/)#(V5-*.0010/)

$*.109k



.136

1436 × 7

RAh,<*0P 2006-13 HJ#("`if=8
g: QK.ah*E *  >U!5]+Np}

x 2. RAr^ (SDM)

AIC (SAR)

AIC (SDM)

z#J 4,5 36

z#J 1,2 36(SDz#J 3 36zTS36

PMc36()PMc36(')

L[u36(q) z#J 4,5 36(q) z#J 1,2 36(SD(q) z#J 3 36(q) zTS36(q) PMc36()(q) L[u36(S(q) PMc36(')(q) #s$eh(q) yX>U-55512.91-55342.21-55706.15.064(.172).634***(.152).247***(.080)-.206**(.081)-.077(.070).075(.069).238***(.039)-.100(.194).138(.318).258*(.140).296***(.085).063(.055).012(.078)-.136***(.050).330***(.074).210***(.035)-.534***(.095)(1) 6{-50021.97-50020.51-49937.16-50038.21-.157(.167).473***(.162).520***(.100)-.127(.087)-.093(.066).050(.059).103**(.042).312(.263).159(.373)-.118(.175).170(.122).047(.054).075(.100).026(.071).192***(.038).417***(.042)-.466***(.041)(2) D@

63.03***-46833.69-46761.38-46657.48-46927.47.455***(.146).479***(.157)-.094(.097)-.318***(.081)-.066(.083).081(.085).181***(.059)-.369(.293).592(.572).466**(.218).345**(.157).029(.063)-.037(.109)-.154**(.078).275***(.048).162***(.023)-.390***(.054)(3) W|

35.32***

47.66***-21562.38-21484.34-21434.85-21545.43-.567*(.323).258(.562).724***(.243).554**(.240)-.080(.121).030(.144).414**(.176).395(.912)-.330(1.440).329(.659)-.053(.506).201(.157)-.126(.328)-.241(.264).209***(.033).144***(.025)-.427***(.022)(4) 9;Bo54.35***

96.37***-57271.91-57234.1-57082.46-57416.36.557***(.074).209***(.077)-.381***(.067)-.445***(.061)-.054(.068).049(.051).019(.032)-.411***(.143).433(.299).357***(.135).360***(.075).094*(.054).041(.058).055(.049).456***(.066).184***(.026)-.748***(.078)(1) 6{

59.88***

108.05***-53450.68-53418.24-53290.38-53566.32.449***(.090).213*(.113)-.175**(.072)-.468***(.073)-.063(.067).038(.051)-.039(.039)-.107(.204).119(.357).110(.143).337***(.100).070(.056).103(.071).135**(.068).356***(.042).205***(.029)-.615***(.058)(2) D@

35.38***

92.49***-60546.38-60523.82-60419.08-60602.74.209***(.038)-.090(.059)-.115***(.036)-.095***(.025)-.074(.059).019(.040)-.007(.024)-.140(.110).490**(.214).129(.079).031(.060).086**(.044).035(.049).031(.037).454***(.060).214***(.024)-.971***(.035)(3) W|

13.98***

17.25**

19.35**-38831.69-38822.12-38815.16-38830.03.106(.125).149(.237)-.179*(.108)-.078(.121)-.080(.082).075(.074)-.040(.098)-.611(.382).779(.509).109(.285).344*(.207).031(.081)-.100(.138)-.020(.154).147**(.057).069**(.028)-.644***(.060)(4) 9;Bo

4&U(2kuU)

AIC (SEM)-55556.77

38.04***

49.18***

42.16***

4&U(y(uU)

AIC (SAC)

73.28***

8.11

541.66***!

Wald _A (vs SAR)

32.74***

726.96***

>UqlvFm

Wald _A (vs SEM)

6.11**

QK.ah~E

1436 × 77Inw1

23.71***

ZO

158.52*** 1%5%10%eh119.60***

w1



Robust-Hausman _Aq******g: