Statement
Evidence in support of intent to harm and negligence

Submitted by :Craig Paardekooper, 17 Dacre House, Beaufort Street, London, SW3 5BH

Background :BSc Psychology
H Cert Life Sciences Allied to Medicine
BSc undergraduate Pharmaceutical Sciences

Contact :Email : craig_pkooper@yahoo.com
Whatsapp : +447531 039 200

EVIDENCE – PART 1 – 100 FOLD VARIATION IN LOT TOXICITY

Analysis of number of adverse reaction reports, deaths, disabilities and life threatening illnesses recorded in VAERS
for Pfizer and Moderna lots, reveals that –1. The lots are part of alphabetical series
2. Lots within any one series vary in number of associated adverse reaction reports – such that some lots areassociated with 100 x higher number of adverse reactions compared to the others
3. There is a sudden drop in adverse reaction numbers between the high toxic and low toxic lots
4. The high toxic lots are all labelled with batch codes that form a continuous, consecutive mathematical series

Here is a graph showing all the Pfizer lots arranged alphabetically along the x-axis. The Y-axis shows the number ofadverse reactions for each lot.
The lots with the same first two letters, i.e. EN, EP, ER, EW, etc, are found to occupy distinct ranges of toxicity(toxicity being determined by the number of adverse reactions produced). Curiously, as the alphabet ascends, thetoxicity decreases.

When I first observed this pattern, it was immediately obvious that lots with similar lot codes were occupying
distinct ranges of toxicity, and that these toxic ranges decreased in a linear, step-wise fashion as the lot codes
ascended the alphabet.
Within each alphabetic group there were a group of high toxicity lots, and a large number of low toxicity lots
(clustered against the x axis), and nothing in between.
Statisticians who have studied this pattern have concluded that it is non-random.

Pfizer EN Series of Lots

Note•huge variation between lots with high numbers of adverse reactions, and lots with low numbers. It is 100
fold difference.

•sudden drop from the 2000 range down to 37•

all the high toxic lots are part of a mathematical series –EN6198, EN6199, EN6200, EN6201, EN6202, EN6203, EN6204, EN6205, EN6206, EN6207, EN6208.

If adverse reactions were the random result of personal comorbidities, then why are they predominantly occurringwith lots that are part of a mathematical series?

Pfizer EW Series of Lots•

As you can see, the lots high-lighted in yellow are responsible for most of the deaths, disabilities and life
threatening illnesses following vaccination. They are 100 fold higher than the remaining lots•

There is a sudden drop between high and low toxicity lots

•The toxic lots form part of a continuous mathematical series

EW Series are the Child Killers

The lots responsible for the highest number of adverse reactions in children are all in the mathematical series
highlighted in yellow.

The lots responsible for the highest number of emergency room visits for children are all in the mathematical series
highlighted in yellow.

The lots responsible for the highest number of hospitalisations for children are all in the mathematical series
highlighted in yellow.

The lots responsible for the highest number of disabilities for children are all in the mathematical series highlightedin yellow.

The EW range, in particular the lots labelled with batch codes forming a continuous mathematical series fromEW0150 to EW0217 is responsible for almost all of the deaths, disabilities of children following vaccination.

EVIDENCE – PART 2 – TEMPORAL ASSOCIATION BETWEEN VACCINE AND TOXIC REACTION
The time of onset between vaccination and severe adverse events is often within 24 hours of vaccination.
Immediacy of Severe Reactions
In Febuary of 2021 I looked at 456 deaths that were recorded in VAERS up to that time. It was claimed that thesedeaths were of very old people who were nearing the end of their lifespan anyway, and consequently that their
death had nothing to do with the vaccination they received. If their deaths are completely unrelated to the vaccine
then the date of their deaths should be randomly distributed relative to the date of the vaccination. There should be
no clustering of death date around the date of the vaccination. So I took a look at the data to see if this was thecase...
I published my findings in a document called - Lethal Injection. Here is a graph from that document showing thedistribution of deaths following vaccination –•••••••••

127 people died within 24 hours
49 people died after 2 days
39 people died after 3 days
29 people died after 4 days
24 people died after 5 days
19 people died after 6 days
16 people died after 7 days
13 people died after 8 days
12 people died after 9 days

This distribution of deaths is strongly clustered around the vaccination date, showing that the vaccine was a strong
contributing cause to their death. A very high proportion of the death occurs the same day as the vaccination. Infact many died within 2 hours of the vaccine being administered !
What About the Onset of Symptoms that led to death?
456 people died, but their death was preceded by symptoms. People never die without symptoms, since there must
be some organ failure or damage to produce death. When we look at the date of onset of symptoms, we find that
there is an even stronger clustering around the date of vaccination. In 194 cases out of 457, the symptoms that led
to death began within 24 hours of the vaccination.
It would have been obvious to the victim that their symptoms and illness began simultaneously with the vaccination,and hence the vaccine was responsible.

What was the cause of their death?
I looked at the patient records for each of the 127 people who died with 24 hours, to find out what they had diedfrom. I gathered together these patient records into the appendix of Lethal Injection. You can read them for yourself.
I was surprised that the vast majority died of heart attack.

Pfizer Leak : A document, pryed out of Pfizer using a Freedom of Information Request, describes 1209 serious
cardiac events between December 1st 2020 and Feb 28th 2021. Here is the report. In the image below, Pfizer admits
that these events occurred up to 21 days after the vaccination, BUT THE MEDIAN is less than 24 hours ! I am justgoing to repeat that - the MEDIAN is under 24 hours - so most of the adverse reactions followed the vaccinations
almost immediately - in many cases the onset of the symptoms leading to their death or disability were apparent
within hours, and the fatal or disabling outcome manifest within a single day. It must have seemed obvious to thevictims, and to their relatives that the vaccine was the most likely cause. See - Pfizer Leak - see p 16 .
In the light of this information, derived from both VAERS and directly from Pfizer, it is confirmed that most of theadverse events occur within 24 hours of vaccination.

Pfizer's document - what it reveals
Between the 1st of December 2020 and the 28th Febuary 2021, 42,086 reports of adverse reactions were received
by Pfizer. Pfizer published the results of these reports in April 2021 - Pfizer Report - see p 16 On page 16, Pfizer laysout a table of the major adverse effects and their time of onset. I invite you to read it for yourself. It may shock you.

Adverse EffectHeart Attack
Haemorrhage
Facial Paralysis
Auto-immune illness
Arthritis
Convulsions, tremors, seizures
HerpesBlood Clots
StrokeNumber of cases
1406
932
449
1050
3600
501
8152
151
275

% of all cases
3.30%
2.20%
1.07%
2.50%
8.50%
1.20%
19.40%
0.30%
0.60%

Median time till onset< 24 hours
1 day
2 days< 24 hours
1 day
1 day
1 day
4 days2 days

These illnesses were breaking out in tens of thousands of people within 24 hours of vaccination. The effects wereimmediate. It was obvious to the victims and to their families that the vaccines were the cause.

Public Health Policy Report - symptoms preceding death
In May 2021, a report was published by Jessica Rose, PhD, MSc, BSc , entitled "A Report on the U.S. Vaccine Vaccine
Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) of the COVID 19 Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Biologicals
Jessica looked at all those who died, and analysed the time of onset of symptoms that preceded death. On page 69
of this report, Jessica states that "70% of all individuals had onset of symptoms within 48 hours following first or second doses."This is a massive safety signal. Did the government respond with investigations? Not at all. "Safety" was of noconcern to them. Their intent was to ignore such safety signals.

Before and After
Such a striking association in time between the vaccine and associated death or disability should surely haveoccasioned an investigation, or even a halt of the vaccination roll-out until the issue was solved. But nothing has
been investigated, and the roll out has not faltered.
No matter what the explanation is for this association - we must remember that in more than half of the reported
events, the severe effect did occur within 24 hours - and stood out because these effects were absent prior to thevaccination. "Onset" is as the word says - "the beginning" of an illness. It wasn't there before. (I think people would
have noticed if they had haemorrhages, heart attacks or facial paralysis before the vaccination.)

EVIDENCE - PART 3 – VARIATION IN THE EFFECTS OF THE VACCINE UPON DIFFERENTGROUPS WITHIN THE POPULATIONWe see evidence of massive variation - this time, not between batches, but rather between different groups in thepopulation. I demonstrate this variation for both women and children.
The vaccines were granted EUA based on a consistency of reaction for all members of the population - if the vaccine
decimates or seriously afflicts one group compared to another, then this may void its EUA.

Gender Differences in Vaccine Effects
Here, I am providing data for what appears to be a highly consistent and very large difference in the effect of thevaccine on women compared to men•

PDF by Craig : Gender Effects•

VIDEO by Craig: Gender Effects•

EXCEL by Mairead Price : VAERS data for men and women by symptom - 18th June 2021

Women are experiencing far more adverse effects

And Pfizer’s own documents support this - a document, provided by Pfizer following a Freedom of Information
Request, describes 42,086 adverse events between December 1st 2020 and Feb 28th 2021.Here we have a strong warning signal – a strong safety alert - that the vaccines are having a worse effect on womenthan on men.
This is a very significant safety signal that the Government has chosen to ignore. Neither have they warned womenof this danger – so they have not provided informed consent.

• Is this warning signal being acknowledged by govt? No.
• Are they carrying out any investigations? No• Are they exempting women from vaccination? NoSo govt intention is to disregard strong safety signals completely? Yes.

If their intention is NOT to protect you from harm – AND
if they are actively promoting the harmful intervention –then we can only conclude that their intention is to harm.

"If I were a vaccine manufacturer I would say how do we know these events were due to vaccine? But then we say ifthese events were not due to vaccine, then we would not see such a male female discrepancy."
Wayne L Winston, Indiana University

Effect on Children

The lots causing most problems in children are the Pfizer batches in the EW series
The chart below shows number of adverse events per batch for children only (aged 6 - 17)

The EW range is shown in green below. The EW series has a toxicity of 1200 to 2500. Historical records show a large
number of EW batches having this toxicity. Yet the regulators failed to investigate.

The chart below shows number of adverse events per batch for all ages

Why are they administering the EW range to children?
Look at the chart above. Assuming that the differences in toxicity (as measured by number of adverse reactions) aredue to differences in concentration of the active ingredients, then the EW range corresponds to half of the full dose.
That's why they are giving it to children. They said that the were giving them a half dose - a "children's dose". "Buthalf of something very toxic, is still very toxic - especially in a small body !!"Fatal effects of EW series on adults
Take another look at the chart, and you will see that the number of adverse reactions for the EW series is still
substantial - varying between 1500 and 2500 ADRs per batch.
Now, go to the Pfizer page of this website and input EW in the search box. Look at how many adults died following
EW administration. Look at how many were disabled, or suffered life thtreatening illnesses...What they areforgetting / ignoring is that the EW series has killed and disabled many healthy adults already.
They are destroying these childrens lives. Injecting these toxins into children will cause them suffering that theycannot escape from. Internal injuries and damage will leave them crying almost continually, in constant
pain...trapped in a hell body.

Fatal effects of EW series on Children
Here are the reported VAERS records for the effect of the EW series on children aged 6-17

Breaking it down by batch
A. Adverse reactions

B. Emergency room visits

C. Hospitalisations

D. Life threatening illnessE. Disability

F. DeathEVIDENCE – PART 4 – THE MECHANISM OF CAUSATION
The vaccine causes human cells to manufacture the spike protein. It has been established experimentally, andbeyond any reasonable doubt that that when blood is exposed to the spike protein, clotting always results.

We even know the precise mechanism by which clots occur –SUMMARYIn the light of
1. The 100 fold variation in lot toxicity
2. The huge variation in the effects of the vaccine on different groups in the population
3. The evidence that the vaccines are causing the adverse reactions –a. Temporal association : the immediacy of adverse reactions following the vaccineb. The mechanism of causation : demonstration that the spike protein – through binding to ACE2
receptors – will automatically induce clotting.
It is an act of criminal intent for the government to persist in mis-informing the public about the adverse effects ofthe vaccines, and in coercing the vaccine uptake through applying restrictions on travel, employment, education andaccess to medical treatment.

EVIDENCE OF INTENT TO HARM
The Government has ignored the safety signals arising from••••

the extraordinary number of deaths and injuries following vaccination.
the appearance of massive variation in toxicity between lots.
the immediacy with which vaccination is followed by death, disability and chronic illness.
the massive difference in the effects of the vaccine upon different parts of the population.

In doing these things, the Government has demonstrated an INTENT to DISREGARD all the safety signals that would
enable the public to avoid harm.
Simultaneously, the Government is pushing the population to have the thing that is causing the harm.
Stubborn intent to disregard safety signals whilst enforcing the very thing that causes the harm, is the strongest
possible evidence that the INTENTION of the Government IS to cause harm.