BC
Beo Čista
Energija d.o.o.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDYPROJECT: NEW LANDFILL WITH THE ACCOMPANYING FACILITIES AT
VINČA LOCATION IN BELGRADEBELGRADE, SEPTEMBER 2019

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDYPROJECT: NEW LANDFILL WITH THE ACCOMPANYING FACILITIES AT
VINČA LOCATION IN BELGRADEINVESTOR:„BEO ČISTA ENERGIJA“ DOO
Tošin Bunar 272v
11000 Beograd

DRAFTED BY:„DVOPER“ DOO
11000 Beograd
Dečanska 5

PARTICIPANTS:NEBOJŠA POKIMICA, Chemist/specialist in toxicologicalchemistry

Dr TANJA RADOVIĆ, Chemical engineer/Ph.D.
license number 371 M423 13

BRATISLAV KRSTIĆ, Chemical engineer
license number 371 C790 06

DOBRIVOJE DŽIPKOVIĆ, Mechanical engineer
license number330 D733 06

NATAŠA ĐOKIĆ, geologist
PAVLE CVETIĆ, Landscape architect
BOJANA LALOVIĆ, Environmental engineer

Belgrade, September 2019.

GENERAL SHEETSSearch of economic entities
Back to search

Basic data

Business Name: Beo Čista Energija d.o.o.Belgrade
Status: Active company
Identification number: 21319775
Legal form: Limited Liability Company Seat: Municipality: Belgrade-Novi
Beograd | City: Belgrade-Novi Beograd | Street and number: Tošin Bunar 272 v
Date of establishment: 12.09.2017
Tax ID: 110224482
Business data

Data of establishment

Registration date: 12.09.2017

Time of duration

Duration limited to: Unlimited

Main activity
Activity Code: 3821
Name of activity: Non-hazardous waste treatment and disposal

Other identification data

Tax Identification Number Tax ID: 110224482
Legal representatives

Natural persons

First name Last Name: Mitsuaki Harada
Position: Director
First name Last Name: Philippe Pierre Marie Auguste Thiel
Position: Director
First name Last Name: Vladimir Milovanović Position:
Director

Registry of Business Entities 5000131503543 BD 90335/2017
On 26.10.2017 Belgrade
Registrar of the Registry of Business Entities kept by the Business Registers Agency pursuant to Article
15, paragraph 1of the Law on Registration Procedure at the Business Registers Agency ("Official
Gazette of RS", no.99/2011, 83/2014), deciding on the registration application for data change with BeoČista Energija d.o.o.Belgrade, identification number:21319775, submitted by:Name and surname: Iskra Lazić
adopts the
DECISION
The r e g i s t r a t i o n a p p l i c a t i o n , S H A L L B E A D O P T E D a n d a c h a n g e o f d a t ais registered in the Registry of Companies at:
Beo Čista Energija d.o.o.Belgrade
Identification/registration number: 21319775
the following changes:
Change of legal representatives:
Natural persons:
The following is omitted:• Name and surname: Belinda Faith Howarth
Passport number and country of issue: 531723769 United
Kingdom Position in the company: Director
Mode of representation: jointly
Restriction on the power of representation by co-signature:- A valid representation of the Company requires the signature of two directors.
•

Name and surname: Stéphane Cédric Heddesheimer
Passport number and country of issue: 07CF52294 France
Position in the company: Director
Mode of representation: jointly
Restriction on the power of representation by co-signature:- A valid representation of the Company requires the signature of two directors.

•

Name and surname: Jean-François Gagnaire
Passport number and country of issue: 11AV09118 France
Position in the company: Director
Mode of representation: jointly
Restriction on the power of representation by co-signature:- A valid representation of the Company requires the signature of two directors.
Page 1 of 2
The following is registered:• Name and surname: Mitsuaki Harada
Passport number and country of issue:TZ1237381
Japan Position in the company: Director
Representation mode: jointly
Restriction on the power of representation by co-signature:- A valid representation of the Company requires the signature of two directors.
••

Name and surname: Philippe Pierre Marie Auguste Thiel
Passport number and country of issue:15FV32897 France
Position in the company: Director
Mode of representation: jointly
Restriction on the power of representation by co-signature:- A valid representation of the Company requires the signature of two directors.
Name and surname: Vladimir Milovanović
Unique citizen's number:1002961710207
Position in the business entity: Director
Representation mode: jointly
Restriction on the power of representation by co-signature:- A valid representation of the Company requires the signature of two directors.
Justification
On 25.10.2017, the applicant submitted the registration application for the change of data
Number BD 90335/2017 and with the application it submitted the documentation specified in
the certificate on the received registration application.
Verifying the fulfilment of the conditions for registration of the change of data prescribedby the provision of Article 14of the Law on Registration Procedure at the Business Registers
Agency, the Registrar determined that the conditions for registration were fulfilled, anddecided as in the operative part of the decision, in accordance with the provision of Article
16of the law.
The amount of the fee for conducting the registration procedure is determined by theDecision on fees for registration activities and other services provided by the Business
Registers Agency ("Official Gazette of RS", no.119/2013, 138/2014, 45/2015 and 106/2015).
INSTRUCTIONS ON LEGAL REMEDIES:
An appeal may be lodged against this Decision to the Minister responsible for the positionof companies and other forms of business, within 30 days from the day of their publication on
the Agency's website, and through the Agency.
REGISTRATOR __________________
Miladin Maglov
Page 2 of 2

EXCERPT ON THE REGISTRATION OF A BUSINESS ENTITY
BASIC IDENTIFICATION DATA
Registration / Identification number | 20407441
STATUS
Business entity status | Active company
LEGAL FORM
Legal form: Limited liability company
Source of funds for establishing and operating a cooperative:DEPOSITS
BUSINESS NAME
Business name DRUŠTVO ZA ZAŠTITU ŽIVOTNE SREDINE I ODRŽIVIRAZVOJ DVOPER DOO BEOGRAD STARI GRAD
Short business name | DVOKUT DOO BELGRADEADDRESS DATAHead Office address
Belgrade-Stari Grad Municipality
City | Belgrade-Stari Grad
Street Dečanska Number and letter 8 - Floor, apartment number and letter
BUSINESS DATA
Establishment information
Foundation date April 11, 2008
Duration
Duration of business entity Unlimited
Main activity
Activity code 7120

On 03.02.2016 at 09:44:09 Page 1 of 3

Activity name: Technical testing and analysis
Other identification information
Tax Identification Number (PIB) 1 | 105557340
Information on the statute/articles of association

There is no obligation to certify the changesof acts of association
Date of valid statute
Date of the founding act in force
Legal (statutory) agents
Natural Persons
Name:Nebojša
Surname:Pokimica
Unique citizen's number (JMBG) 0101972780015
Position | Director
Co-signature restriction
there is no restriction by co-signatureby co-signature
Directors/members of the Board of Directors
Directors
Board members
First Name Nebojša Surname Pokimica
Unique citizen's number (JMBG) 0101972780015
Procurators
Individual procura
Name Ratko Surname Đorđević
Unique citizen's number (JMBG) 0405943330077
Members/Co-owners
Member information
Business name | DVOKUT-ECRO doo
Registration/
Identification number 00539651
Information on the capital
Payment amountamountdate

Subscribed:EUR 3,000.00, in counter value of RSD 247,026.90

On 03.02.2016 at 09:44:09 Page 2 of 3
Amountdate

Subscribed:RSD 3,752,973.10
Paid:EUR 3,000.00, in counter value ofMarch 28, 2008.

RSD 247,026.90

Amountdate

Paid:RSD 3,752,973.10

March 4, 2015

Amount (%)
Co-ownership of the share of 100,00000
The share capital of the company

Cashamountdate

Subscribed:EUR 3,000.00, in counter value of
RSD 247,026.90

amountdate

Subscribed:RSD 3,752,973.10
amountdate

Paid:EUR 3,000.00, in counter value of
RSD 247,026.90
March 28, 2008
Amountdate

Paid:RSD 3,752,973.10 March 4, 2015

On 03.02.2016 at 09:44:09 Page 3 of 3

Licenseof the CHIEF DESIGNER
In accordance with Law on Planning and Constructionof the Statute of the Serbian Chamber of Engineers

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CHAMBER OF ENGINEERS OF SERBIA
establishes that
Tanja T.Radović
Graduate Engineer of Technology
LIB 11580077263
is the Chief Designerof technological processes
License No.
371 M423 13
PRESIDENT OF THE CHAMBER

Chamber President
Milovan Glavonjić
B.Sc. El. Eng.

In Belgrade,
July 4, 2013

SERBIAN CHAMBER OF ENGINEERS
LICENCEof the CHIEF DESIGNER

In accordance with Law on Planning and Constructionof the Statute of the Serbian Chamber of Engineers
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CHAMBER OF ENGINEERS OF SERBIA
establishes that
Bratislav B. Krstić
Graduate Engineer of Technology
JMB 0708959710131
Chief Designerof technological processes
License No.
371 C79006

Chamber President
Milan Vuković
BSc Cons. Eng.
In Belgrade,
January 26, 2006

Number:12-02/336525
Belgrade, 14.02.2019

Pursuant to Article 75of the Statute of the Serbian Chamber of Engineers("OG of RS", no.88/05, 16/09 and 27/16), and at the personal request of a Chamber member,
The Serbian Chamber of Engineers issues
CERTIFICATE
Confirming that Bratislav B.Krstić, B.Sc.Tech.
licence No.
371 C790 06
forthe chief designer of technological processeson the day of issue of this certificate is a member of the Serbian Chamber of Engineers, thathe settled the obligation to pay the membership fee to the Chamber as of 26.01.2020.
and that his license had not been revoked by a decision of the Court of Honor.

Vice President of the Board of Directorsof the Chamber of Engineers
Latinka Obradović BSc Constr.Eng.

TERMS OF REFERENCE

In accordance with the positive legislation and the Decision on determining the scope and content of
the Study on environmental impact assessment of the project for the construction of a new landfill withaccompanying facilities at the Vinča site in Belgrade, Ministry of Environment, number 353-0200815/2018-03 of 09.05.2019, prepare an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY:
PLANT FOR THE ENERGY UTILIZATION OFMUNICIPALWASTE AND THE LANDFILL GAS"VINČA".
Belgrade, September 2018

INVESTOR_______________

Pursuant to Article 128 of the Law on Planning and Construction ("Official Gazette of RS" No.
145/2014), the Law on Environmental Protection ("Official Gazette of RS" No. 14/2016 and 95/2018)
and the Law on Environmental Impact Assessment ("Official Gazette of RS" No. 36/09), I adopt thefollowing

DECISION
ON THE DESIGNATION OF THE CHIEF DESIGNER

For the production of the
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY OF PROJECT: PLANT FOR THE
ENERGY UTILIZATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE AND THE LANDFILL GAS "VINČA"of Project Leader "BEO ČISTA ENERGIJA" DOO from Belgrade, the following shall be appointed as
the Chief Designer:
PhD Tanja Radović, BSc in Tech. Eng./PhD
The appointed is obliged to do all the relevant documentation in accordance with the above laws,
professional rules and engineering practice.

JUSTIFICATION

For the purposes of Article 128 of the Law on Planning and Construction, it is stipulated that the
preparation of technical documentation is carried out by a responsible designer who must meet theprescribed conditions.

Belgrade, September 2018
Director
Nebojša Pokimica

Pursuant to Article 19of the Law on Environmental Impact Assessment ("Official Gazette of RS", No.
36/09), I adopt the following

DECISION

A multidisciplinary team is designated to draft the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTSTUDY: PLANT FOR THE UTILIZATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE AND LANDFILL GAS"VNČA", of Project Leader "BEO ČISTA ENERGIJA" DOO from Belgrade, in the following
composition:
Chief Designer:

PhD Tanja Radović, B.Sc.Tech./Ph.D.License number:371 M423 13Team members:

NEBOJŠA POKIMICA, BSc in Chemistry/ Spec. of
Toxicological Chemistry BRATISLAV KRSTIĆ, BSc in
Tech. Eng.
License number: 371 C790 06
DOBRIVOJE DŽIPKOVIĆ, BSc in
Mech. Eng. License number 330 D733 06
NATAŠA ĐOKIĆ, BSc in Geol. Eng.
PAVLE CVETIĆ, BSc in Landscape Architecture andHorticulture BOJANA LALOVIĆ, Master Environmental
Engineer

Appointees are required to comply with environmental legislation,technical norms, standards and professional rules when drafting theEnvironmental Impact Assessment Study.

Belgrade, September 2018
Director
Nebojša Pokimica

Based on the Law on Planning and Construction ("Official Gazette of RS" 145/2014) and theLaw on Environmental Protection ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No. 14/2016
and 95/2018)

I DECLARE

When drafting the
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY OF PROJECT: PLANT FOR THE
ENERGY UTILIZATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE AND LANDFILL GAS "VINČA"I fully complied with:- Terms of Reference- Relevant legal regulations pertaining to the project in question Rules of the profession regarding the solutions given in this projectIn Belgrade, September 2019

Chief Designer:
PhD Tanja Radović,
B.Sc.Tech./Ph.D.License
number:371 M423 13

_________________________________________________________________________________________CONTENTS
1.0. INFORMATION ABOUT THE INVESTOR

30

2.0. LOCATION DESCRIPTION
2.1. CADASTRAL PARCELS WHERE THE PROJECT IS REALIZED
2.2. DATA ON AREA
2.3.
OVERVIEWOF
PEDOLOGICAL,GEOMORPHOLOGICAL,GEOLOGICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL AND SEISMOLOGICAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TERRAIN
2.4. DATA ON THE SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY
2.5. OVERVIEW OF CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS WITH RELEVANTMETEOROLOGICAL INDICATORS
2.6. DESCRIPTION OF THE FLORA AND FAUNA, NATURAL ASSETS OF
SPECIAL VALUE (PROTECTED) RARE AND VULNERABLE PLANT AND
ANIMAL SPECIES AND THEIR HABITATS AND VEGETATION
2.7. BASIC LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS
2.8. IMMOVABLE CULTURAL GOODS
2.9. DATA ON THE POPULATION DENSITY AND CONCENTRATION
2.10. DATA ON EXISTING COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL OBJECTS,
FACILITIES OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUPSTRUCTURE
2.11. DATA ON HEALTH CARE IN SERBIA

31
41
43

73
75

3.0. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

77

3.1. DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES, PLANNED PRODUCTIONPROCESS OR ACTIVITY, THEIR TECHNOLOGICAL AND OTHER
CHARACTERISTICS
3.1.1. Calculation of slope stability of new, old and inert landfills under static anddynamic conditions
3.1.2. Regulating and Landscaping
3.1.3. Overview of the required types and quantities of energy and energy sources,
water and raw materials
3.1.4. Review on the types and quantities of released gases, water, and other liquidand gaseous waste materials, observed by technological units and the technology of
their treatment
3.2. OVERVIEW OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE PLANNED AND
DESIGNED SOLUTIONS WITH THE REFERENCE BAT DOCUMENT

44
57
58

63
66
70
73

79
177
194
200

201
209

23
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

4.0. OVERVIEW OF MAIN ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BY THE
PROJECT LEADER
5.0. OVERVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE
LOCATION AND THE SURROUNDING AREA
5.1. POPULATION
5.2. AIR
5.3. WATERS
5.4. SOIL
5.5. FAUNA AND FLORA
5.6. LEVEL OF NOISE IN THE ENVIRONMENT
5.7. BUILDINGS, IMMOVABLE CULTURAL GOODS, ARCHAEOLOGICALSITES AND AMBIENT UNITS
5.8. LANDSCAPE

236
240
240
245
259
279
306
286
312
316

6.0. DESCRIPTION OF THE POSSIBLE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS OF THE
PROJECT ON ENVIRONMENT
6.1. POSSIBLE IMPACTS DURING PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE
6.2. POSSIBLE IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION
6.3. POSSIBLE IMPACTS DURING REGULAR OPERATION
6.4. OTHER POSSIBLE RISKS AND IMPACTS
6.5. CUMULATIVE EFFECTS WITH OTHER FACILITIES

318
318
318
324
325
337

7.0. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN THE EVENT OF AN
ACCIDENT
7.1. NATURAL RISKS
7.2. FIRE AND EXPLOSION RISK
7.3. EXTERNAL RISKS
7.4. RISK OF ACCIDENTS CAUSED BY HUMAN FACTOR

338
338
339
341
341

8.0. DESCRIPTION OF MEASURES PROVIDED FOR THE PREVENTION,
REDUCTION AND DISPOSAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF
THE PROJECT
8.1. MEASURES PROVIDED BY LAW AND OTHER REGULATIONS,NORMATIVES AND STANDARDS AND DEADLINES FOR THEIRIMPLEMENTATION
8.2. MEASURES TO BE TAKEN IN ACCIDENT SITUATIONS
8.3. PLANS AND TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
8.4. OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES FORPREVENTION OR REDUCTION NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT

342

342
344
345
352

24
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

9.0. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MONITORING PROGRAM
9.1. REVIEW THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE BEGINNING OF THE
PROJECT IN THE LOCATIONS WHERE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
IS EXPECTED
9.2. PARAMETERS, LOCATIONS, METHOD AND FREQUENCY OF
MEASUREMENT OF DETERMINED PARAMETERS

353

10.0. NON-TECHNICAL OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY

364

11.0. DATA OF TECNICAL DEFICIENCIES

364

12.0. BASE FOR STUDY DRAFTING

364

354
354

ANNEXES25_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Legend of used abbreviations

City/CoB
CO
COD
CPU
CV

EnglishBest Available Techniques
Beo Čista Energija d.o.o.
Biological Oxygen Demand (5days)
Best Available Techniques (BAT)
Reference document developed
under the IPPC Directive and the
IED
Cogeneration or Combined Heat andPowerCity of Belgrade
Carbon Monoxide
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Central Processing Unit
Calorific Value

E&S

Environmental and Social

ZŽSSZ

EfW

Energy from Waste
Elektromreža Srbije (Transmission
Network Operator)

EiO

BAT
BCE
BOD
BREF

CHP

EMS
EPS

Elektroprivreda Srbije (Distribution
Network Operator)

NRT
BČE
BPK
NREF

KTE
Grad
CO
HPK
CJP
KV

EMS
EPS

EU
FGT
GC
GHG
HCl
HDPE
HF
Hg
IBA
LFG

Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment Study
European Union
Flue Gas Treatment
Gradska čistoća Beograd
Greenhouse Gases
Hydrochloric Acid
High-Density Polyethylene
Hydrogen Fluoride
Mercury
Incinerator Bottom Ash
Landfill Gas

LTP

Leachate Treatment Plant

PPPV

m.a.s.l.
MEP
MSW
NOx
PPP
PUC
RAP
RO
RWD
TOC
WWT

Meter Above Sea Level
Ministry of Environment Protection
Municipal Solid Waste
Nitrogen Oxide
Private Public Partnership
Public Utility Company
Resettlement Action Plan
Reverse Osmosis Unit
Republic Water Directorate
Total Organic Carbon
Waste Water Treatmentm.n.m.
MZŽS
KČO
NOx
JPP
KP
APR
JRO
RDV
UOU
PPOV

ESIA

PUŽSSP
EU
TDG
GČ
GSB
HCl
PVG
HF
Hg
PDI
DG

Serbian
Najbolje raspoložive tehnike
Beo Čista Energija d.o.o.
Biološka potrošnja kiseonika(5 dana)
Najbolje raspoložive tehnike (NRT)
Referentni dokument razvijen pod
IPPC Direktivom i DIE
Kogeneracija kombinovane toplote ienergije
Grad Beograd
Ugljen monoksid
Hemijska potrošnja kiseonika
Centralna jedinica za preradu
Kalorijska vrednost
Zaštita životne sredine i socijalna
zaštita
Energija iz otpada
Elektromreža Srbije (Operater
dalekovodne mreže)JP Elektroprivreda Srbije
Procena uticaja na životnu sredinu isocijalna pitanja
Evropska Unija
Tretiranje dimnog gasa
Gradska čistoća Beograd
Gasovi staklene bašte
Hidrohlorna kiselina
Polietilen visoke gustine
Vodonik fluoridŽiva
Pepeo na dnu insineratora
Deponijski gas
Postrojenje za prečišćavanje procednih
otpadnih voda
Metara iznad nivoa mora
Ministarstvo zaštite životne sredine
komunalni čvrsti otpad
Azot oksid
Javno privatno partnerstvo
Komunalno preduzeće
Akcioni plan za raseljavanje
Jedinica za reverznu osmozu
Republička direkcija za vode
Ukupni organski ugljenik
Postrojenje za prečišćavanje otpadnih

26_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________English
DRP
CiM
CaM
CP
RHSS
MCL
CDW
EPARS

Detailed Regulation Plan
City Municipality
Cadastral Municipality
Cadastral Plot
Republic Hydrometeorological
Service of Serbia
Maximum Continuous Load
Construction & Demolition Waste
Environmental Protection Agencyof the Republic of Serbia

PDR
GO
KO
KP

Serbianvoda
Plan detaljne regulacije
Gradska opština
Katastarska opština
Katastarska parcela

RHMZ

Republički hidrometeorološki zavod

MCR
OIR

Maksimalno kontinualno opterećenje
Otpad od izgradnje i rušenja
Agencija za zaštitu životne sredine
Republike Srbije

SEPA

27
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________INTRODUCTION
The “Vinča” Landfill was established in 1978. In the mid-1990s, it was decided to close thelocations of all city dumps, except the “Vinča” landfill. Since 1998, “Vinča” has been the
only landfill in the city of Belgrade. Currently, it receives about 6,000 tons of waste per day,which makes it the largest landfill in Serbia.
Landfill Vinča has been used for more than 40 years for disposal of municipal solid wastefrom the territory of the City of Belgrade, and receives 550,000 tons of municipal solid waste(MSW) each year from 13, out of the 17 Belgrade municipalities.
In the process of harmonization of the legislation of the Republic of Serbia with the EU
regulation, the incorporation of EU directives related to municipal solid waste was also
implemented. Given the size and importance of the Vinča landfill, as well as the many
problems that arise in its operation, the City of Belgrade initiated this project with the aim of
rehabilitating and maintaining the Vinča landfill, ie. taking care of the existing landfill (oldlandfill), construction and arrangement of the new landfill, as well as construction (EFW) of
the waste treatment and heat production plant.
As part of the municipal waste landfill project in Vinča, the following will be included:
Remediation of the old landfill (with perimeter embankments and cover), including
temporary long-term storage of construction waste (CDW) processed for new use,
Inert materials landfill for inert construction waste at the top of a rehabilitated landfill;
Landfill extension: temporary landfill, unprocessed waste landfill and landfill for postprocessing waste;
Rainwater, leachate water and biogas drainage and collection network;
Leachate and rainwater collection pools;
Leachate and biogas treatment platforms;
Crushing Platform: A platform for the treatment and processing of construction waste
for reuse;
Access and inland roads,
Facilities and work capacities:
Control zone at the entrance, which includes: wheel scales, supervisor station andparking;
Inner wheel scales (to be adjusted according to material flow);
Landfill platform, which includes a zone for cleaning and work machines parking,parking for light vehicles, landfill maintenance facility, offices and locker room.

28_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

This Project also includes:
The facility for the municipal waste utilization plant (EfW) is being designed by“Energoprojekt-Entel”, which is integrated into the general disposition of the global landfillsite. The bottom incinerator ash settling zone (IBA) - (intended to deposit ash from the bottomof the incinerator before being reused as construction material or storing that ash at the landfill
after treatment) is located on the platform of the municipal waste utilization facility (EfW);
Crushing and sorting plant for construction waste, designed by “EnergoprojektIndustrija”, including earthworks and water drainage systems
The supporting building that lies downstream of the rehabilitated landfill - obligationsof the City (designer "Hidrozavod”).

The project envisages the implementation of conventional and proven technological solutions
and technologies, in conjunction with the EU, IFC (SU), EBRD, GSB and Serbian standards.
The entire project is carried out according to the contract on Public Private Partnershipconcluded between the City of Belgrade and the special purpose company " Beo Čista
Energija" doo.
The subject of this study is the assessment of the environmental impact of the new landfill
with accompanying facilities construction on the existing municipal landfill site in Vinča.
The study is made on the basis of the Law on Environmental Impact Assessment (“Official
Gazette of the RS” Nos. 135/2004 and 36/2009), Rulebook on the content of the study on
environmental impact assessment (“Official Gazette of the RS” No. 69/2005 ) and Decision on
Determining the Scope and Content of the Environmental Impact Assessment Study of the
New Landfill with Accompanying Facilities Construction Project at the Vinča Site in Belgrade,
Ministry of Environment Protection, No. 353-02-1686 / 2018-03 of 8/29/2018..

29_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

1.0. INFORMATION ABOUT THE INVESTOR„BEO ČISTA ENERGIJA“ DOO
Company name:„BEO ČISTA ENERGIJA“ DOO Beograd

Short company name:Head office/Address:
Activity:
Business activity code:
Registration number:
TAX ID„BEO ČISTA ENERGIJA“ DOO
Tošin Bunar 272v
Treatment and disposal of non-hazardous waste
3821
21319775
110224482
Mitsuaki Harada
Philippe Pierre Marie Auguste Thiel
Vladimir Milovanović
Malik Kerker
011/715 88 84
011/715 88 86
bce@bceenergy.rs

Directors
Representative:
Telephone:
Fax:
E-mail:30_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.0. LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Macro location
The landfill "Vinča" is located in the eastern part of Belgrade (approximately 12 km from thecity center), in the settlement Vinča.
In the wider surroundings of the landfill "Vinča", in a radius of more than 900 m, there aresettlements: Slanci, Veliko selo and Mirijevo. To the south, the nearest settlement is Vinča,
whose center is located approximately 3 km from the landfill body, however, parts of thesettlement are located no further that 1.7 km from the landfill. To the north, the nearest parts ofthe settlement Veliko Selo are also located 1.7 km from the landfill body. The first parts of thesuburban areas of Kaluđerica and Mirijevo are located over 2 km towards west. In the east, on
the other side of the Danube River, there is a suburban area of Starčevo, 7 km away from thelandfill. Town Pančevo, with its numerous industrial elements, is located 8 km northwest, also
on the other side of the Danube.

Figure 1 Macro location of Landfil complex “Vinča”

31_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Distances (in the air line) of the “Vinča” landfill complex, from surrounding facilities, aregiven in the following tables:
Vulnerable object
Old cemetery Vinča
Gravel exploitation
Danube River
The nearest house in Vinča
The nearest group of houses in Vinča
The Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences
The nearest group of houses in Kaluđerica
Smederevski put
The nearest house in Mirijevo
The nearest group of houses in Mirijevo
The nearest house in Veliko Selo
The nearest group of houses in Veliko Selo
Monastery of Holy Archbishop Stephan

Distance, m
900
1000
1500
1700
1700
2300
2500
3600
2800
4000
1600
1100
1200

Orientation
SE
SE
E
SE
S
S
W
SW
NW
NW
N
NE
N

The Belo Brdo archaeological site is approximately 3km away from the Vinča landfill
complex, southeastward. The precise location of the Veteran's Villa was not determined by thecompetent Institute for Immovable Cultural Property.
The listed objects are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 Significant spatial elements of project site surrounding

32_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Monastery of Holy Archbishop Stephan (Slanci Monastery) is located 1.2 km north of theexisting landfill site. It is visually separated by a dense forest and hill southward. A newcomplex was built in 1960s on the site of the historic monastery, and consequently, the area is
protected as an archaeological site. Northeast of the monastery is a cemetery, 1.6 km awayfrom the landfill.
The old (“country”) cemenetery is located 0.9 km southwest from the landfill. On the east sideof cemetery is a hiking trail that connects Vinča and Veliko Selo settlements. The church of St.
Apostles Petar and Pavle is located in the center of Vinča, i.e. 3 km from the landfill. The
largest cemetery in the area is the Lešće cemetery, located 4 km northwest from the landfill
complex.
Schools and sacral buildings are located in all major settlements surrounding the landfill. The
nearest school is in Veliko Selo, about 2 km north of the landfill.
The Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences is surrounded by forests and partially separated fromthe settlement. It is located 2.2 km southwest from landfill.
An asphalt production plant is located southwest from the landfill body (approx. 400 m).
Larger industrial areas are located in the western parts of Belgrade. In relation to the landfill,they are 5 km southwest, west and northwest. The high-voltage switchyard is located 3 km
northwest from the landfill site (by skyline).
The most significant industrial area is located in the southern part of Pančevo, where an oil
refinery, chemical industry complexes and a river port are located. In relation to the landfill,they are about 8 km northeast by skyline.
The Danube River is located 1.5 km east from the landfill site. About 3 km northeast there is
the Danube Canal - Dunavac, and northern of it there are several river islands.

33_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The following pictures show the distances of the closest houses from the Vinča landfill
complex border.

First house across from the cemetery, 1080 m, southeast

First houses in Vinča, 1850 m, southeast

34_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________First house in Stara Kaluđerica, 1930 m, southwest

First house in Mirijevo, 2850 m, east

35_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________First house in Slanci, 1070 m, northwest

First house in Veliko selo, 1600 m, northwest

36_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Facility in the orchard at the cemetery, 850m, southeast

37_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Micro location
Landfill Vinča is located on the teritory of municipalities: Grocka, Palilula and Zvezdara, on
the right bank of the Danube River. The “Vinča” landfill complex is located on parts of theterritory of 3 city municipalities, ie.3 cadastral municipalities:- Grocka municipality, CM Vinča- Zvezdara municipality, CM Mali Mokri Lug and- Palilula municipality, CM Slanci
The municipal waste landfill Vinča covers an area of approximately 140 ha, located in thevalley of the Ošljanski potok (Ošljan stream). Landfill location falls to the north-east and it issurrounded by hills on the southern and western side. Below the landfill body flows
Ošljanski potok, which flows into Ošljanska bara (Ošljan Pond). Road connection of thelandfill is through Beogradska ulica to Smederevski put – in the length of about 3 km.
The narrower area around the landfill is mainly used for agriculture (fruit and vegetableproduction), however, some of the parcels are now abandoned (there is a succession ofagricultural land). A smaller number of agricultural land is located next to the landfill.
Forests are reduced to smaller forest communities.
The project of the New Landfill with the accompanying facilities is planned within thecomplex of municipal waste landfill in Vinča. Within this study, the following contents andfacilities are considered:
1. Entrance and control zone
2. CDW plant
3. New landfill
4. Operative platform
5. Upper platform with lagoons for leachate and rain water
6. Lower platform with lagoons for leachate and rain water
7. Protective dam around the old landfill (support structure)
8. Torch system
Based on the project documentation, within the comprehensive project for the arrangement of
the location of landfill municipal waste in Vinča, rehabilitation, recultivation and closing of
the existing "old" landfill will be carried out.
In accordance with the Rulebook on Methodology for Preparation of Rehabilitation andRemediation Projects ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia" No. 74/2015), it is theInvestor's responsibility to prepare the Design for Rehabilitation and Remediation of the "Old"Municipal Waste Landfill and to obtain consent of the competent Ministry of Environment
Protection.

38_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Planned contents of the new landfill project are distributed in the free space around theexisting body of the "old" landfill.

Figure 3 Situation of planned facilities within the New Landfill project
The entire landfill complex in Vinča is defined by the Amendments to the Detailed
Regulation Plan of the Vinča Sanitary Landfill ("Official Gazette of the City of Belgrade"No. 86/2018).
Predmetnim PDR dokumentom, na kompleksu postojeće deponije komunalnog otpada u Vinči
definisano je 5 prostorno-funkcionalnih celina (K1-K5):
The Plan of Detailed Regulation on the complex of the existing municipal waste
landfill“Vinča” has 5 spatially-functional units defined (K1-K5:
K1 – area for construction of energy utilization of municipal waste plant;
K2 – platform for construction waste and construction waste treatment plant;
K3 – construction area for the new sanitary landfill of municipal waste (new landfillbody) and torch system;
K4 – recultivated area (the area of the existing landfill body), retaining structure andinternal roads andK5 - facilities in the function of sanitary landfill of municipal waste, leachate
treatment plants, landfill for inert waste, internal roads and protective green belt.

39_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The subject of this study is the contents that are located within the defined DRP frames:
Unit K2 - a platform for the Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) treatment. The
CDW platform will be set up as a heavy platform, equipped with crushers and sieves for
aggregates production. The plant will have heavy machinery (hydraulic excavator withmultiple connections and loader). The platform will be equipped with the necessary
infrastructure.
Unit K3 – area for construction of the new sanitary landfill for municipal waste. The
construction of the new sanitary landfill for municipal waste is planned west of the existing
landfill body, and will be formed from several cassettes. The cassettes will be successively
formed and opened, in accordance with the plan and needs. The construction of cassettes
itself should enable permanent, controlled, organized and safe disposal of waste. The entire
bottom surface of the landfill will be insulated to be waterproof. Isolation of the bottom
surface for the waste disposal is done by artificial barriers, gradually during the work of thelandfill.
Unit K4 - recultivated area (the area of the existing landfill body), retaining structure andinternal roads. The closing procedure for the landfill body ends with the recultivation of theclosed landfill area part and its fitting in the surrounding landscape. The existing landfill bodyis characterized by the existence of a system for the collection and evacuation of the filtrates
and systems for the collection and control of gases, which occur in the interior of the landfill
body. A supporting structure (protective support construction) is planned in the pillar part areaof the landfill body and aims to stabilize it. In addition to the above mentioned, acircumferential embankment with drainage channels around the body of the old landfill, as
well as the communal track, are foreseen.
Unit K5 – facilities in the function of sanitary landfill for municipal waste, leachate
treatment plants, inert waste landfill, internal roads and protective green belt. In thisfunctional unit there are facilities, traffic and infrastructure networks and systems that serveand connect other functional units, such as:- control entrance in the complex;- truck and weightbridge;- operative landfill plateau/platform (administrative facility, workshops, flammableliquids storage, diesel fuel station, mechanization, trucks and other vehicles washingand parking area);- upper and lower platform with facilities for leachate and atmospheric water collection
and leachate water treatment (lagoons, leachate water treatment plant);- inert waste landfill;- internal roads, communal paths and infrastructure facilities and areas;- other facilities and areas used in municipal waste management.
Besides mentioned, this unit also includes:- protective green belt and- free areas reserved for possible expansion of functional units or construction of new
facilities used in municipal waste management.
40_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The detailed regulation plan also defines the construction plots for communal areas (KP6-1
to KP6-7):- building plot KP6-1 (Unit K1) – EfW plant, approximate area of 4.75 ha- building plot KP6-2 (Unit K2) – CDW platform, approximate area of 2.13 ha- building plot KP6-3 (Unit K4) - Existing landfill body which recultivation is plannedwith support structure, approximate area of 48.44 ha- building plot KP6-4 (Unit K5) - Access road area (internal road - part Nova 1),
approximate area of 1.18 ha- building plot KP6-5 (Unit K5) - Access road area (internal road - Nova 5), approximate
area of 2.07 ha- building plot KP6-6 (Unit K5) - Access road area (internal road - Nova 4), approximate
area of 1.46 ha- building plot KP6-7 (Unit K3 and K5) - areas for new municipal waste landfill
construction and facilities in its function, leachate treatment plant, inert waste landfill, internalroads and protective green belt, approximate area of 69.37 ha; In addition to this, internalroads, weighing scales, truck parking lots, water tank, TS35 / 10kV substation, torch, etc. areforeseen. The new landfill body is also characterized by the existence of a filtrate collectionand evacuation system and a gas collection and control system, occurring inside the landfill
body
The subject of this study is the objects that will be realized on building plots KP6-2, KP6-3,
KP6-4 and KP6-7.
For the phase construction and arrangement of the Vinča Waste Management Complex in
Belgrade - Public-Private Partnership Project of the City of Belgrade for the provision oftreatment and municipal waste disposal services at the Vinca landfill, the Locational
Conditions, number 350-02-00104 / 2019-14 from April 12th, 2019. are obtained from the
Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure.

2.1. CADASTRAL PARCELS WHERE THE PROJECT IS REALIZEDThe construction of the new landfill with accompanying facilities is planned, in accordancewith Location conditions, on cadastral parcels given in the following table, all in CM Vinča,
Municipality Grocka - City of Belgrade.

41_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Cadastral parcels

Public surface name431/6; 431/5; 441/3; 438/10; 457/3;457/2; 461/4; 458/6; 458/3; 438/9; 438/8; 461/2; 458/2; 438/4; 438/2;
438/1; 439/4; 466/15; 466/14; 14/3; 466/13; 466/12;466/11; 466/10; 466/8; 465/3; 466/5; 466/4; 466/3;
462/4; 463/3; 463/2; 463/1; 464/1; 443/2; 16/5; 17/4; 7/5; 7/4; 6/3; 17/3; 11/2; 423/5; 423/3; 420/7;
420/5; 419/3; 428/9; 428/5; 428/4; 427/5; 427/4; 425/5; 446/2; 428/2; 427/2; 427/1; 420/3; 420/1; 422/5;
423/4; 2666/7; 2666/6; 2666/5; 422/4; 422/3; 421/6; 421/5; 421/4; 2688/2; 2668/7; 2668/6; 405/4; 411/6;
400/2; 400/1; 390/3; 396/2; 392/1; 2692/5; 917/3; 917/2; 918/4; 918/3; 919/3; 920/3; 921/3; 937/14;
937/13; 937/9; 937/8; 5/4; 915/1; 924/2; 499/5; 498/4; 2676/8; 2676/7; 496/3; 2668/13; 497/3; 496/2;
655/4; 495/4; 495/3; 497/2; 654/7; 651/8; 654/5; 654/4; 499/4; 499/3; 2676/5; 654/3; 654/2; 499/2;
2679/7; 500/12; 500/11; 500/10; 381/15; 381/14; 381/8; 940/2; 942; 919/2; 920/2; 921/2; 482/2; 482/1;
488; 487; 659/2; 662/2; 656/2; 656/1; 655/3; 650/3; 651/10; 652/9; 652/8; 652/7; 652/4; 652/3; 651/5;
939/3; 948/4; 943/2; 687/2; 685/2; 681; 959/1; 957/1; 948/2; 948/1; 1034/2; 688/47; 688/44; 688/43;
688/41; 688/6; 680/6; 2679/11; 2679/10; 678/166; 678/165; 679/2; 2679/3; 678/21; 962/3; 963/1;997/7;
955/2; 952; 1031/2; 1038/8; 1038/7; 1038/6; 1038/5; 1037/6; 1037/5; 1036/4; 1036/3; 689/6;
Building plot KP6-2 (Unit K2) – CDW 961/2;
1036/2; 689/9; 689/7; 688/61; 688/60; 688/58; 688/49; 688/46; 688/45; 688/42; 688/12; 689/3; 689/2;
platform, approximate area of 2.13 ha;
688/56; 688/55; 688/54; 688/53; 688/37; 688/36; 688/34; 688/33; 688/32; 688/31; 688/30; 688/20;
688/19; 688/22; 2679/14; 678/184; 678/183; 678/182; 678/181; 2679/12; 688/28; 678/170; 678/169;
994/3; 993/2; 2693/8; 965/3; 1000/2; 998/2; 1042/4; 1041/1; 1041/2; 1041/4; 1040/4; 1043/2;
690/4; 1004; 1002/2; 1022/3; 1023/3; 1023/2; 1024/2; 1025/2; 1045/4; 1045/3;1048/2; 691/6; 1044/2;
1005/7; 991/11; 996/8; 996/7; 1015/9; 1014/9; 1014/8; 1014/7; 1014/6; 1015/8; 1015/7; 1013/12;
1013/10; 1013/9; 1014/3; 1015/3; 1015/2; 1014/2; 1013/4; 1005/2; 996/4; 1015/13; 1016/7; 1017/6;
Building plot KP6-3 (Unit K4) - Existing 1017/4; 1016/5; 1014/5; 1018/2; 1018/1; 900/87; 1051/4; 900/73; 900/12; 900/74; 1051/9; 1051/6;
landfill body which recultivation is 1050/5; 1050/3; 1050/1; 1050/2; 977/4; 978/4; 1108/6; 987/6; 1108/4; 979/5; 991/10; 991/8; 991/7;
1007/6; 1006/4; 990/2; 1007/3; 1006/2; 991/4; 1011/2; 1012/2; 986/6; 1007/15; 1007/13;
plannedwithsupportstructure, 990/6;
1007/10; 1006/5; 1008/10; 1008/9; 2693/6; 1008/7; 1008/5; 1008/4; 2693/2; 1013/14; 1009/6; 438/11;
approximate area of 48.44 ha
461/3; 462/3; 464/4; 464/3; 465/6; 460/4; 465/2; 465/1; 464/2; 462/2; 462/1; 461/1; 443/1; 444/3; 455/3;
455/2; 442/1; 441/2; 456; 2692/4; 916/3; 1/3; 937/2;9/1; 8/2; 8/1; 16/4; 6/2; 6/1; 12/2; 12/1; 11/1; 10/2;
10/1; 914/2; 915/2; 7/3; 7/2; 7/1; 471/3; 471/2; 471/1; 470; 469; 468/3; 424/3; 446/1; 445/1; 495/1;
494/3; 494/2; 494/1; 425/4; 425/3; 425/2; 425/1; 424/4; 2666/8; 498/3; 498/2; 498/1; 2688/1;
2676/6; 2668/8; 400/3; 401/4; 401/3; 401/1; 422/1; 654/1; 2677/1; 499/1; 399; 497/1; 424/1; 421/1;
396/1; 397;381/3; 381/2; 936/1; 936/2; 943/1; 928; 926; 927; 909; 910; 684; 486; 485/2; 485/1; 481;
Building plot KP6-4 (Unit K5) - Access 2679/8; 658/3; 657/3; 657/2; 657/1; 493; 660/2; 660/1; 661/2; 959/3; 959/2; 960/3; 960/2; 960/1; 957/2;
road area (internal road - part Nova 1), 956/2; 961/1; 1030; 1031/1; 1032/2; 1032/1; 951; 950; 949; 1034/3; 2678/1; 1035/3;
1035/2;1035/1;1036/1; 1034/1; 1037/1; 689/8; 2680/3; 688/59; 688/40; 688/39; 688/38; 688/35; 688/18;
approximate area of 1.18 ha
680/14; 680/9; 688/17; 688/26; 688/8; 688/7; 688/5; 688/4; 679/3; 678/179; 678/168; 678/167;
2679/2; 678/22; 680/8; 2693/9; 967/3; 966/4; 993/1; 994/2; 994/1; 964/3; 1021/1; 1027/2; 1027/1;
1003/1; 1003/2; 1000/1; 1044/1; 1042/5; 1042/3; 1041/3; 1040/3; 1043/1; 1045/2; 1045/1; 1046; 1042/2;
1042/1; 1040/1; 690/1; 1013/7; 991/9; 991/5; 1013/3; 1013/5; 1014/11; 1015/11; 1016/8; 1011/1;
1014/10; 2668/16; 2668/15; 900/88; 2668/9; 1017/3; 900/77; 900/76; 1013/1; 1049/2; 986/7; 989/3;
Building plot KP6-7 (Unit K3 and K5) - 455/1; 438/14; 438/13; 438/12; 457/1; 439/3; 440/3; 454; 439/1; 438/3; 440/1; 441/1; 4/2; 5/3; 5/1;
916/2; 916/1; 917/1; 937/5; 937/4; 2692/1; 914/1; 918/2; 918/1; 919/1; 920/1; 921/1; 924/1; 923/2;
areas for new sanitary landfill for 923/1; 922; 937/1; 935/1; 925; 911; 912; 913; 2665; 655/2; 682; 683/2; 683/1; 657/4; 492; 491/2; 491/1;
municipal waste construction and 489; 478/2; 478/1; 477; 476; 475; 490; 480; 479; 451; 450; 500/16; 500/15; 500/14; 650/4; 650/5; 655/8;
655/5; 653/2; 653/1; 654/8; 651/7; 2677/4; 2677/3; 654/6; 2676/4; 395/2; 2677/2; 651/6; 651/3;
facilities in its function, leachate treatment 655/7;
651/2; 651/1; 398; 381/1; 962/2; 962/1; 995/2; 995/1; 996/2; 997/4; 963/2; 1021/3; 1021/2; 1022/2;
plant, inert waste landfill, internal roads 1022/1; 1023/1; 1024/1; 1025/1; 1039/4; 1039/3; 690/2; 1038/4; 1038/2; 1002/1; 1038/1; 1037/4;
and protective green belt, approximate 1037/3; 1037/2;1028; 1038/3; 1039/1; 1001; 1029; 932; 1026; 1040/2;1039/2; 997/8; 998/3; 999/2;
999/1; 1033/3; 1033/2; 1033/1; 693/3; 693/1; 694/2; 695/2; 688/29; 688/27; 688/16; 688/21; 688/2;
area of 69.37 ha;
688/1; 680/10; 680/12; 979/8; 1007/11; 969/7; 969/6; 979/6; 987/5; 986/10; 1008/6; 1007/9; 1007/8;
979/3; 989/2; 968/2; 1008/2; 1007/1; 1010/3; 1051/5; 1010/1; 1051/2; 1051/1; 1051/3; 10/3; 9/3; 9/2;
8/3; 16/1; 17/9; 939/8; 939/4; 939/2; 676/2; 495/6; 495/5; 494/4; 494/5; 2668/14; 420/8; 662/1; 655/6;
661/3; 420/6; 420/4; 419/1; 428/8; 429/2; 427/6; 427/3; 445/3; 445/2; 444/2; 444/1; 2679/4; 496/1;
661/1; 655/1; 495/2; 424/2; 467/2; 466/1; 14/2; 423/2; 423/1; 428/1; 420/2; 452/2; 452/1; 467/1;
466/6; 466/2; 453; 449; 448; 447; 1015/15; 1014/14; 1013/17; 1013/15; 1005/6; 992/3; 966/3;
1009/7; 1012/1; 1049/3; 1048/1; 691/7; 995/3; 996/10; 996/9; 965/1; 1015/6; 1009/3; 1020/3; 1020/2;
1020/1; 2668/1; 1013/2; 1006/1; 1047; 996/1; 996/3; 996/6; 996/5; 997/3; 997/5; 998/1; 1019; 997/2;
997/1; 997/6; 957/4; 953; 954; 955/1; 956/1; 957/3; 940/1; 939/9; 958/3; 958/2; 958/1; 2692/2; 931; 944;
945/1; 945/2; 946; 947; 948/3; 941; 939/1;934; 933; 935/2; 930; 929; 678/178; 677/1; 678/164; 2679/9;
658/2; 658/1; 659/1; 680/7; 678/162; 680/13; 680/5; 680/4; 680/11; 680/3; 680/2; 691/5; 691/4; 690/5;
10/4; 2680/2; 2680/1; 688/48; 15/4; 15/3; 18/3; 2678/2; 2668/2; 2676/1; 686; 680/1; 688/9; 689/5; 689/1;
690/3; 691/1; 685/1; 484; 483; 468/2; 468/1; 474/1; 473; 472; 14/1, 13; 15/2; 15/1; 687/1; 474/2

42_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.2. DATA ON AREA
The territory covered by the Detailed Regulation Plan is 149.8 ha. The area of “Vinča”
landfill for municipal waste complex is about 132 ha. The total (net) area of the planned
facilities is about 50 ha.
Table 1 Net area of planned contents and facilities
Content
Facilities
Entrance and control
Supervising station and weighbridgezone

CDW platform

New landfill
Inert waste landfill

Operative platform

Upper platform- Administrative building (office, sanitary andstorage container)- CDW plant platform (storage, treatment andsorting of construction demolition waste)- Areas for disposal of secondary raw materials(CDW non-hazardous waste)- Area for disposal of finished product (fractions
from CDW plant)- Parking and internal road at the platform- Temporary (sanitary) municipal waste landfill- Untreated waste landfill- Landfill for residues produced after waste
treatment at the EfW plant- Administrative building- Workshop with vehicle washing area
- Storage for hazardous substances- Diesel fuel pumping station- Storage/containers for hazardous waste- Parking: mechanization, delivery vehicles, trucks
and passenger vehicles- Sedimentation pool/separator of light petroleum
products- Fecal wastewater treatment plant (WWT)
Lagoon for atmospheric water
Lagoon for leachate

Lower platform

Lagoon for atmospheric water
Lagoon for leachate
Zone for leachate treatment (LTP)

Support structure
Total

-

Area, m2
13.38021.054289.735
86.0755.000

16.4301.700
2 x 960
38.6801.760
3 x 1.900
1.050
15.86849.84 ha43_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.3. OVERVIEW OF PEDOLOGICAL, GEOMORPHOLOGICAL,GEOLOGICAL,HYDROGEOLOGICALAND
SEISMOLOGICAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TERRAIN
Pedology
According to the pedological cover at the Grocka municipality, there are two major
geomorphological units. Valley part with fluvisol type of soil, formed in the area towards the
Danube river at 250-300 m elevation. In the higher parts of the municipality, above powerful
loess deposits, chernozem and its subtype - eroded chernozem is located. Vertisol in notpresent in large quantities. North-eastern Šumadija hill area is characterized by kambisol soil
and kambisol in the podzolization process with much lower productive capacity compared tochernozem and fluvisol. Soils in the territory of the Municipality of Grocka are characterized
by very heterogenous physical and chemical properties.
Topography and morphology
In geomorphological terms, most of the Belgrade area consists of hilly parts of the terrain, withsmaller areas of plain terrain. On the hilly, slightly stratified relief, on which the largest part ofthe city of Belgrade is located, as well as a number of suburban settlements, the mountain
Kosmaj stands out with an altitude of 626 m above sea level. Of all the geomorphologicalprocesses, the most important role in shaping the relief of this area certainly had a fluvial
process. The karst process, the marine process, the proluvial process, deluvial process, and eol
process had and still have their share in shaping the relief. The most visible forms of the fluvial
process are the alluvial plains of the Sava and Danube and river terraces.
At the“Vinča”landfill location, the terrain is hilly and characteristic for the right bank of the
Danube. The altitudes in the wider area range from 70 meters above sea level along the Danube
bank to 200-250 meters above sea level west of the Danube.
In terms of morphology, two units can be distinguished within the subject terrain: theDanubian alluvial plain and its sloping, hilly hinterlands. Within the sloping part of terrain,
two units can be distinguished. The first unit is the immediate part of the right Danubianslope, whereas the second unit includes the slopes of Ošljanski potok (Ošljan stream), whichhave been developed in the western hinterlands of the Danubian slope. The Danubian slope
strikes in N-S direction, and in the landfill zone its width is 500-600 m, with a vertical rise of
80-170 m a.s.l. The Danubian slope gradient south of Ošljanski potok (Ošljan stream) is 612° and even up to 30-40°, whereas its northern part is much milder, with the gradient
ranging from 4-15°. Slopes of Ošljanski potok (Ošljan stream) are relatively mild, withgradients ranging from 6-9° (3.8-5.7%) on the average, extremely they amount to 5° (3.0%)
and maximally 15-18° (9.5-11.0%). Southern branch of the valley is considerably moresinuous than its western and northern part.

44_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Geological and hydrogeological characteristics of the terrain at the site of the New
Landfill Project
Geological and geotechnical investigation for the design and construction of a new municipal
waste landfill complex in Vinča were carried out by Energoprojekt Niskogradnja a.d. in
November 2017. Geological and geotechnical investigations covered the whole Vinča landfill
complex, which includes not only the New landfill, but also all other supporting contents, iefunctional units (Figure 4. Presentation of piezometers and other excavated boreholes andpits).
Investigations include exploring the contains, characteristics and state of geologicalconditions of area by performing geological, hydrogeological, geophysical, geomechanical,
seismological and other investigations.
Considering ground water quality investigation, it was performed and planned to be
performed (in total 2 campaigns) investigation on 6 sampling points, from installed andequipped piezometers as presented in the following table. More boreholes and research pits
were excavated during wide investigation, as well.
Table 2 Review on installed investigation piezometers, Geological-geotechnical testing for thedesign and construction of a New Landfill in the municipal waste landfill complex in Vinča
Energoprojekt Niskogradnja, 2017.
Code ofinvestigation
work
Pz-1
Pz-2
Pz-3
Pz-4
Pz-5
Pz-6

Type ofinvestigationwork
piezometerpiezometerpiezometerpiezometerpiezometerpiezometer

Y

X

Depth
[m]

7468958.44
7469090.51
7468353.07
7468366.38
7467691.28
7467987.38

4960564.25
4960244.82
4960560.54
4959997.38
4959733.85
4959418.89

20
20
25
25
25
25

Groundwaterlevel [m]
7,35
12,50
12,50
4,00
17,90
22,30

Also, hydrogeological characteristics of subject field were determined during investigations
on some piezometers, through the performing of permeability coefficient and filtration
coefficient of the field material, porosity, compactness and mineralogical contain, as well as
the analysis of the ground water level measurements in piezometers. Obtained filtration
characteristics for subject piezometers are presented in the following table.
Table 3 Filtration properties and lithological level description – overview, Geologicalgeotechnical testing for the design and construction of a New Landfill in the municipal waste
landfill complex in Vinča Energoprojekt Niskogradnja, 2017.
Piezometer

Level (m)Kf (m/s)Pz-1

5.50 -6.50

1.45 x 10-8

Pz-1

9.00 -10.00

1.23 x 10-8

Pz-2

2.00-3.00

2.28 x 10-6

Litological level description
Sandy dust (ML/SM) to silty sand, lithologicallyheterogeneous zone, brittle, easily crushable, olive color.
Degraded marly clay (CL/ML), sporadically sandy, withlow plasticity, easily splittable, easily crushable, with Fehydroxide spurts, delaminated by silty sand interbeds withthickness up to 0.50 m, brown-yellow color.
Loess-like sediments – silty sand to sandy silt (ML/SM),45_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Piezometer

Level (m)Kf (m/s)Pz-2

7.00-8.00

9.71 x 10-8

Pz-3

4.00-5.00

6.20 x 10-8

Pz-3

12.00-13.00

7.38 x 10-7

Pz-4

4.00-5.00

7.71 x 10-9

Pz-5

2.50-3.50

6.06 x 10-10

Pz-5

7.00-8.00

6.07 x 10-7

Pz-6

4.00-5.00/

Pz-6

7.00-8.00

2.06 x 10-7

Pz-6

9.70-10.70

2.06 x 10-7

Litological level description
dry, loose, without visible impurities, yellow in color.
Degraded marly clay (CL), dry, brittle, easily crushable,
low plasticity, delaminated by spurts of fine-grained sandand marly cement, of brown-yellow color.
Degraded marly clay (ML), with a brittle fracture andcrumbly structure, with Fe hydroxide impurities, sandspurts, locally with fissures filled with carbonate silt up to
6.70 m, uniform i.e. homogeneous at larger depths,
relatively hard, partially sandy, yellow in color, dappledwith pale greyish hue.
Degraded marl clay, hard, dry, with a portion of thin silt
sand spurts, dark-gray color.
Degraded marly clay (Cl) of medium plasticity, at the
beginning of the layer with plenty of carbonate impurities,
at larger depths occurs in a shape of spurts, hard, wellpacked, poorly permeable, dappled with marlstones along
the layer, of olive to olive-yellow color.
Deposits of silty-clayey composition, with low plasticity,
poorly packed, low moisture, of yellow-olive color.
Degraded marly clay with fissure porosity and with
abundance of impurities in the shape of carbonate silt andconcretions, with laminae of Fe hydroxide, sand and spurtsof high-plasticity clays – down to the eight meters, further
down it is homogeneous, i.e. uniform, relatively hard, withlocally brittle fractures due to portion of silty particles andcarbonate silt, basically yellow to yellow-olive color.
Clay (CL/CI) with low to medium plasticity, hard, highly
compact, with low moisture and uniform composition, ofbrown color.
Diluvial deposits – clay (Cl) of medium plasticity, hard,well-compacted, poorly permeable, with inclusions ofcarbonate concretions at lower parts of the layer, of browncolor.
Sandy silt (ML/SM) to silty sand, lithologicallyheterogeneous medium colored by Fe hydroxides, brittle,
easily crushable, delaminated by clay interbeds of medium
plasticity in the interval from 12.00-12.60 m, of brownyellow color.

46_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Levels of ground water in all mentioned piezometers were determined and information on thatis presented in the following table.
Table 4 Ground water level measured in the periods 25.10.-13.12.2017. and 01.02.30.03.2018.
Piezometer

Pz-1
Pz-2
Pz-3
Pz-4
Pz-5
Pz-6

Top pipelevel(m.a.s.l)

121,7
121,5
175,0
167,1
214,8
220,2

Average,m

Groundwater level (m.a.s.l)
25.11.

01.12.

13.12.

01.02.

07.03.

30.3.

114,0
108,0
161,6
161,9
196,1
197,3

113,2
108,1
162,4
162,3
196,2
196,9

112,9
108,1
162,7
162,4
196,1
197,0

113,7
108,5
162,9
162,4
196,1
197,1

/
108,8
162,9
162,5
196,0
197,1

121,3
109,0
162,8
162,6
195,0
197,1

-

5,0
12,5
12,5
4,3
18,3
22,5

Chemical analysis of the ground water sampled from piezometers (Pz-1 to Pz-6) was
performed in order to determine the aggressiveness of ground water on concrete and reinforced
concrete, in accordance with the Rulebook on technical normative for concrete and reinforced
concrete in objects under the influence of aggressive environment (Official gazette of SRJ, No.
18/92).
According to performed analysis, it can be concluded:
Pz-1: ground water sample does not show an aggressive effect of excretion, the generalacidic or magnesia aggressiveness, but shows carbonated, sulfate and ammonia
aggressiveness.
Pz-2: ground water sample shows aggressive effect of excretion, but does not show
general acidic, carbonated, sulfate, ammonia or magnesia aggressiveness.
Pz-4: ground water sample shows aggressive effect of excretion and carbonatedaggressiveness, but does not show general acidic, sulfate, ammonia or magnesia
aggressiveness.
Pz-6: ground water sample shows aggressive effect of excretion, but does not show
general acidic, carbonated, sulfate, ammonia or magnesia aggressiveness.
Chemical analyses of the ground water sampled from piezometers (Pz-1 to Pz-6) and someother existing boreholes (NP-11 and asphalt base well) were also performed in order todetermine the ground water quality, in accordance with the Regulation on the Program of
Systematic Monitoring of Soil Quality via Indicators for Assessment of Soil Degradation
Risk and Methodology for Creation of Remediation Programs (“Official Gazette of the
Republic of Serbia”, No. 88/10), Annex 2: Remediation values of concentrations ofhazardous and deleterious substances and values that could indicate significant groundwatercontamination (a new Regulation was adopted in 2018).
Results on these investigations are presented within particular document named “Report on
Groundwater Quality”, prepared by Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering a.d. in April, 2018.
47_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________For the assessment of groundwater quality, two series of water sampling and analysis were
performed by the certified Laboratory for Occupational Safety and Environmental Protection"Beograd" Ltd. and they are as follows:− Series I: sampling was performed in November 2017 at the following locations:NP-11, Pz-1, Pz-2, Pz-4, Pz-5, Pz-6;− Series II: sampling was performed in March 2018 at the following locations: NP11, Pz-2, Pz-4, Pz-5 and water from asphalt base well.
The piezometer locations were selected for investigation in order to analyze the impacts ofthe existing landfill on groundwater quality (NP-11, Pz-1, Pz-2 and possibly Pz-4, which islocated downstream from the existing landfill) and groundwater quality in the part thatshould not be exposed to the impact of the existing landfill (Pz-5, Pz-6 and asphalt base well,which are located upstream from the existing landfill).
Results of groundwater quality chemical analysis indicate the following conclusions:
pH value
pH value of water in piezometers varies in the slightly alkaline range, amounting to 7.2–8,
except in NP-11 and Pz-1, where values in Series I were 6.7 and 6.9 (slightly acid medium).
Turbidity and suspended solids
Values of turbidity are mostly high, ranging from 2.06 to 136 NTU. Total suspended solids
are in the range of 13–390 mg/l. High values were registered in the impact zone of theexisting landfill (NP-11), which is logical, but also in the asphalt base well (185 mg/l). It isinteresting to note that the highest values of turbidity and suspended solids were registered in
Pz-5, which is not exposed to the impact of the existing landfill (136 NTU and 390 mg/l).
Mineralization
Electric conductivity is highest in the impact zone of the existing landfill i.e. in Pz-1
(12,620 μS/cm), Np-11 (4,380 μS/cm), Pz-4 (1,349 μS/cm) and Pz-2 (1,234 μS/cm). Total
residue after evaporation at 180oC correspondes to values of electric conductivity.
Out of mineral substances, macro components, chlorides are most frequent in the impact
zone of the existing landfill: Pz-1 (3,711.31 mg/l) and NP-11 (10,515.32 mg/l), while othervalues ranged from 6-134 mg/l. The lowest value was registered in the asphalt base well.
High value of sodium was registered in the landfill impact zone, in Pz-1, being 2,156.9 mg/l.
Other values range from 8.1 to 232.8 mg/l.
Concentration of bicarbonates is highest in NP-11 (1017 mg/l), while values of thisparameter in other piezometers range from 24.5 to 699.2 mg/l. Calcium concentration ishighest in Pz-1 (434.4 mg/l) and NP-11 (30.3 mg/l).
Nutrients
The highest concentration of nitrate concentration was registered in Pz-1 (370.91 mg/l).
Values of this parameter in other piezometers range from < 0.04 mg/l to 12.92 mg/l.
Concatenation of ammonia is also highest in Pz-1 (21.4 mg/l), followed by Np-11 (2.72mg/l). In other samples, it was below 1 mg/l. Nitrite concentrations in the majority ofsamples were <0.04 mg/l and they were 0.08 mg/l only in Pz-2 and 0.3 mg/l in Pz-5.
Concentrations of phosphates and total phosphorus in all samples were < 0.08 mg/l and <0.01 mg/l, respectively.
Content of organic matter48_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The value of biological oxygen demand (BOD) was highest in Pz-1 (398 mg/l) and NP-11(63 mg/l). On the other hand, very low BOD values (1 and 2 mg/l) were registered in Pz-2,
although this piezometer is under impact of the existing landfill. BOD values in otherpiezometers ranged from < 1 to 5 mg/l. Values of chemical oxygen demand (COD)
corresponded to BOD values.
Content of dissolved oxygenSadržaj rastvorenog kiseonika
Oxygen concentration depends directly on the presence of oxidable substances.
Concentrations of dissolved oxygen were lowest in NP-11 (3.5 mg/l) and Pz-1 (5 mg/l),
where the lowest values of BOD and COD were also registered. Low value of oxygen
concentration was also registered in the asphalt base well (4.1 mg/l). The well is very deep(300 m) and water has remained in a long time period, while inflow of fresh (storm) waterrich in oxygen through around 80 m thick soil layer is very slow.
Heavy metals
Concentrations of heavy metals were below the remediation values, in accordance with theRegulation on limit values for pollutants, harmful and dangerous substances in soil (“Official
Gazette of RS”, No. 30/2018), Annex 2 Remediation limits of pollutants, harmful anddangerous substances in the aquifer. The only exceptions were:- Chromium concentration in Pz-1 (0.1 mg/l) while remediation value is 0.03 mg/l;- Copper concentration in Pz-1 (0.13 mg/l) while remediation value is 0.075 mg/l;- Zinc concentration in Pz-2 (1.62 mg/l) and Pz-5 (1.27 mg/l) while remediation value
is 0.8 mg/l;- Nickel concentration in Pz-1 (0.73 mg/l) and NP-11 (0.13 mg/l) while remediation
value is 0.075 mg/l.
Organic micropollutants
The analyses included control of mineral oils and cyanides. Concentrations of theseparameters were below the respective remediation values, in accordance with the Regulation
on limit values for pollutants, harmful and dangerous substances in soil (“Official Gazette ofRS”, No. 30/2018), Annex 2 Remediation limits of pollutants, harmful and dangerous
substances in the aquifer.
General conclusion
Based on the analyses of water quality preformed in November 2017. and March 2018, it was
concluded that water samples from piezometers that are exposed to the impact of the existing
landfill (NP-11, Pz-1, Pz-2 and possibly Pz-4) and the ones that are not under the landfill
impact differ with respect to their physical-chemical composition. It was noted that increased
concentrations of some parameters (turbidity, suspended solids, nitrites, zinc) were registeredin Pz-5, which is not under the impact of the existing landfill. This situation was explained asa consequence of wash-off from the surrounding terrain (out of the existing landfill zone) and
import of pollutants in groundwater.

49_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Namely, the Pz5 piezometer is made at the watershed, where there is no water runoff, so "deadwater" remains in that zone for a long time. For this reason it is turbid water, with a slightly
higher concentration of suspended solids and nitrites. It is not about groundwater pollution, but
about local pollution. In support of this, the Pz5 piezometer was constructed on a section that
represents the pathway by which secondary raw material collectors convey secondary raw
materials, resulting in an increase of organic matter at that site.
Regarding the deep well at the asphalt base located just upstream of the landfill complex, it
was concluded, based on one analysis performed in March 2018, that the existing landfill has
no impact on water quality in this well.
The positions of the piezometer boreholes, in base and cross-sections of the terrain, areshown in the following pictures.

Figure 4 Location of piezometer boreholes and other excavated boreholes and pits,
Geological-geotechnical testing for the design and construction of a New landfill in themunicipal waste landfill complex at Vinča Energoprojekt Niskogradnja, 2017.

50_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 5 Piezometer position, cross-section, Geological-geotechnical testing for the design andconstruction of a New landfill in the municipal waste landfill complex at Vinča Energoprojekt
Niskogradnja, 2017.
Groundwater quality testing was also carried out on 04/02/2019. The accredited “Anahem”
Laboratory from Belgrade has sampled and analyzed with the methods specified in SPRS EN
ISO 5567-1, SRPS ISO 5567-3, SRPS ISO 5567-11 and SRPS EN ISO 19458. Within thiscampaign, water from 13 piezometers has been sampled, and 76 different parameters were
tested and analyzed.
The results of these analyzes are presented within the document "19040102 Vinča Sampling
02042019". Overview of basic parameters of tested samples:
General parameters
None of the measured values exceeds the remediation levels.
Salinity
None of the measured values exceeds the remediation levels.

51_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Oxygen regime
None of the measured values exceeds the remediation levels.
MetalsNone of the measured values exceeds the remediation levels except nickel (Ni) in water
sampled in the piezometer Np-11, whose concentration is slightly higher than the remediationlevel (measured: 96 µg / l; remediation level: 75 µg / l).
Organic compounds
None of the measured values exceeds the remediation levels.
Geotechnical conditions at the Supporting structure site
Study on geotechnical conditions for design and construction of Supporting structure (dam) in
new municipal waste landfill complex was carried out by Hidrozavod DTD Novi Sad in 2018.
Within the Study, chemical analysis of the ground water samples taken from three piezometers
Bvp-2, Bvp-5 and Bvp-7, positioned directly adjacent to the landfill body at the site of landfill
completion and continuation of surface water flow, was performed in order to determine theaggressiveness of ground water on concrete and reinforced concrete, in accordance with theRulebook on technical normative for concrete and reinforced concrete in objects underinfluence of aggressive environment (“Official gazette of SRJ”, No. 18/92). Analysis of groundwater was performed by Occupational Safety and Environmental Protection “Beograd” Ltd.,during March 2017.
Having in mind that the supporting structure has already been constructed (during the
preparation period of this study) based on the Regulations on the establishment of state
reconstruction program in the process of emergency landslide remediation in the city ofBelgrade, part of the municipality Grocka, caused by floods in May and June 2018. (attachedto the study), an analysis of groundwater aggressiveness towards concrete and reinforced
concrete was performed for the purposes of the standard design procedure of concrete mix inrelation to designing project performance (PP).
For the purpose of designing concrete structures, an analysis of groundwater aggression from2017. is sufficient. Prior to the commencement of the concrete works, additional analysis will
be carried out, as part of the standard procedure for the design of concrete mixes within the PP
phase.

52_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 5. Review on installed investigation piezometers, Study on geotechnical conditions forthe design and construction needs of the Supporting building in the municipal waste landfill
complex at Vinča, Hidrozavod, 2018.
Code ofinvestigation
work
Bvp-2
Bvp-5
Bvp-7

Type ofinvestigationwork
piezometerpiezometerpiezometer

YX

Depth [m]Relativegroundwater level

74691627469132
7469202496039349604794960443

30
25
20

1,60
1,90
0,85

Figure 6. Position of piezometer wells and other boreholes and pits, Study on geotechnicalconditions for the design and construction needs of the Supporting building in the municipal
waste landfill complex at Vinča, Hidrozavod DTD Novi Sad, 2018.

53_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 7 Position of piezometer wells, cross-section, Study on geotechnical conditions for thedesign and construction needs of the Supporting building in the municipal waste landfill
complex at Vinča, Hidrozavod DTD Novi Sad, 2018.
Results of groundwater quality chemical analysis indicate:Bvp-2: ground water sample shows an aggressive effect of excretion and sulfate
aggressiveness, but does not show general acidic, carbonated, ammonia or magnesia
aggressiveness.
Bvp-5: ground water sample shows an aggressive effect of excretion, carbonated andsulfate aggressiveness, but does not show the general acidic, ammonia and magnesia
aggressiveness.
Bvp-7: ground water sample shows an aggressive effect of excretion, sulfate andcarbonated aggressiveness, but does not show general acidic, ammonia or magnesia
aggressiveness.
Seismological characteristics
According to the latest regional research of the Republic Seismological Institute of Serbia(Source: www.seismo.gov.rs), parameters of seismicity for the territory of the Republic of
Serbia have been determined. According to the map of the seismic hazard for the expected
maximum horizontal acceleration on the base wall - Acc (g) and the expected maximum
intensity of the earthquake - I max in the units of the European macroseismic scale (EMS-98),
during the return period of 95, 475 and 975 years, maximum intensity and acceleration
earthquakes shown in the table can be expected.

54_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Seismic parameters
Acc(g) max.
I max (EMS-98)

Table 6 Seismic parameters
Return period (years)
95
475
0,03-0,12
0,05-0,25
V-VII
VI-VIII

975
0,05-0,30
VII-IX

Figure 3 Map of the seismic hazard according to the horizontal acceleration parameter(return period 95 years (left) and return period 475 years (right)

55_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 4 Map of the seismic hazard according to the macroseismic intensity parameter (return
period 95 years (left) and return period 475 years (right)
Based on the maps of seismic hazard (Source: www.seismo.gov.rs), according to themacroseismic intensity parameter, the territory of the City of Belgrade is located in the VIVIII MCS zone (Mercalli intensity scale).

56_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.4. DATA ON THE SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY
Today, the Belgrade Waterworks is a complex water management system and consists offollowing hydrotechnical facilities:- water source area,- transport of raw water,- wastewater treatment plant and- distribution system:• primarni transport (tunnel system),• water supply network,• pumping stations and• reservoirs.
The length of the water supply network is 3,263 kilometers, the diameter is 25-2,500
millimeters. It has 135,000 main connections, 15,000 hydrants, 27 reservoirs with a capacityof 240,000 cubic meters and 28 pumping stations with a power of 36 megawatts.
Water is processed in 5 plants: Bele vode, Banovo brdo, Bežanija, Makiš and Vinča. The
projected capacity of the groundwater plant is 8,060 l/s, and the water supply system is 3,580
l/s. Makiš has production plants: "Makiš I" and "Jezero".
Groundwater is treated in plants Banovo brdo, Bežanija and part of Bele vode. The following
technological processes are applied: aeration, retention, filtration and chlorination.
In the second part of the Bele vode, Makiš and Vinča plants, river water is processed. In Makiš
and Jezero production plants, modern processing technology is applied with more complex
technological processes which, in addition to clarification, sand filtration and final disinfection
with chlorine, include ozonation and filtration of water with activated carbon filters.
The water supply system in Vinča was included into the Belgrade water supply system in 1997.
This water supply supplies drinking water to around 15,000 inhabitants of the Vinča andLeštane settlements, and the water that is being processed is by origin superficial and drained
from the Danube.
Rulebook on the Method of Determining and Maintaining Sanitary Protection Zones of Water
Supply Sources (Official Gazette of RS, No. 92/08), Article 24, defines the Zone of direct
sanitary protection (Zone I) of water intake in an open watercourse that includes the water area
and the territory around the water intake facility, which is marked by buoys in the watercourseand by a fence on the shore, preventing the uncontrolled access of humans and animals, so that
Zone I upstream extends at least 100 m, both sides laterally in relation to the flow of water 30
m and downstream 20 m.
Based on the above, the location of the municipal waste landfill in Vinča is located outside thezone of direct sanitary protection of the Vinča river water treatment plant.

57_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.5. OVERVIEW OF CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICSRELEVANT METEOROLOGICAL INDICATORS

WITH

By their climate characteristics, the study area belongs to humid continental climate, withwarm summers and cold winters, as basic characteristics of this type of climate. Basic climatecharacteristics of the study area are determined by its geographical position, its wide openness
to the Pannonian Planes, as well as its relief. In addition to this, topographic and morphologicalcharacteristics classify Belgrade as a “Košava” area. Summers are warm and on average, 31days per year temperatures are above 30°C, and for 95 days per year are above 25°C. Winters
are cold and snowy, with an average of 21 days per year bellow 0°C.
Due to being completely open to the north and northwest, and the absence of any significant
orographic obstacles, this area is frequently under the influence of cold air masses, whicheasily penetrate to the south through northern and central Europe. To the northwest ofObrenovac, at the air distance of 60 km, there is a mountain range Fruška gora (538 m.a.s.l.),which is the only orographic obstacle to these currents of air masses. For the purpose ofdetermining the climate characteristics of the study area, data on average annual precipitation
for the Belgrade precipitation measuring station were analyzed, as well as the data on averageannual temperatures and air humidity for the Belgrade meteorological station. Data on climateparameters are obtained from the Meteorological Observatory Belgrade (44° 48' W and 20° 28'
E, 132 m.a.s.l. in Karađorđe Park) and refer to the period 2000-2018.
Precipitation
Full analysis and interpretation of the precipitation represents one of the bases for the study ofgroundwater, but also of other environmental parameters in the study area. Precipitation
amounts which annually fall on the study area are different and depend on the relief, altitude,
precipitation exposition; also, precipitation is unevenly distributed during the course of theyear, with widely varying values.
The data of the Republican Hydrometeorological Institute of Serbia for Belgrade rain gauge
stations were used to determine the precipitation regime in the study area. Average annual
precipitation sums for the period 2000-2018 were analyzed.

58_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 7 Average monthly and annual precipitation (mm) for the Belgrade meteorologicalstation for the period 2000-2018 (RHMZ, Belgrade)year/month
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
year/month
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Monthly
precipitation(average)

I
27,3
35,3
15,1
62,9
93,5
52,2
43,2
49,3
I
44,6
55,1
91,6
47,8
87,2
76,9
24,1
48,6
46,3
23,4
29,3

II
III
IV
V
VI
VII VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
28,3 30,3 41,9 34,5 19,1 29,3 7,8 70,7 16,6 20,7 41,2
27,2 65,6 157,9 47,0 186,0 19,7 56,7 183,7 16,7 63,4 33,9
14,0 14,8 53,7 20,9 79,6 60,7 106,8 51,9 88,3 35,8 52,8
26,5 11,4 23,1 39,5 33,4 111,8 6,4 57,6 115,2 23,4 36,7
29,4 18,9 71,7 63,3 113,8 94,6 89,3 45,0 32,9 129,5 50,3
84,2 33,9 54,7 47,4 95,1 91,4 144,3 54,1 28,6 23,5 78,8
59,1 104,4 97,0 42,3 137,8 23,3 120,6 24,3 20,9 24,5 51,956,0 99,6 3,8 79,0 107,6 17,5 72,5 84,1 103,6 131,5 34,5
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
8,3 79,7 34,9 60,6 43,3 53,0 45,6 68,5 18,4 51,0 79,0
85,2 64,9 6,1 34,7 151,0 80,0 44,5 3,9 98,9 59,5 120,6
112,8 47,2 43,7 86,4 181,7 41,4 53,5 51,8 48,8 45,2 36,1
55,6 27,9 14,1 66,8 41,1 95,0 14,0 47,7 36,1 5,0 48,0
61,5 2,4 66,9 127,9 16,0 39,0 4,5 30,7 44,9 28,1 55,1
53,4 95,4 21,3 104,4 50,1 2,93,0 58,7 52,0 40,0 7,9
19,9 48,7 85,3 280,4 60,3 250,6 63,5 126,0 61,2 8,8 66,3
52,4 132,9 30,7 80,7 38,6 10,6 49,5 101,4 71,8 63,4 3,838,5 102,6 53,9 71,3 152,2 35,0 60,8 47,8 76,8 71,8 2,623,5 27,0 51,8 86,1 53,0 26,4 19,5 48,5 65,9 41,2 45,2
58,1 64,8 39,7 56,2 121,6 53,0 44,8 11,2 18,6 35,3 60,7

TOTAL
367,70893,10594,40547,90832,20788,20749,30
839,00TOTAL
586,90804,40840,20499,10564,20566,001,095,10
684,40
759,6
508,8
603,3

50,19

47,05 56,44 50,12 75,23 88,49 59,75 53,03 61,45 53,48 47,45 47,65

690,73

As can be seen from the table above, the rainiest month for the analyzed period is June, while
the least precipitation is excreted during February and November. The mean perennial
precipitation for the study area is 690.73 mm of water column. Due to the size of the study
area, as well as the different altitudes of individual parts of the city, the average annual
precipitation varies from 367-1095,1 mm.
Air temperature
Air temperature represents a direct indicator of the amount of solar energy received by acertain area, which is consided as a very important parameter in assessment of water
evaporation from surface, ie determining the water balance. Data obtained from measurements
performed at the “Belgrade” meteorological station for the period 2000-2018. were used for
defining the temperature regime and they are presented graphically.

59_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Slika 10. Diagram of average monthly air temperatures for the Belgrade Meteorologicalstation (for the period 2000-2018)
Air temperatures in a given period are continuously increasing during the year from the coldest
month of January until the hottest month of July, after which the temperatures tend to decrease
until the month of December. Lowest average temperatures occur in January (2°C) and highest
during July (24.3°C). Mean perennial temperature value for the study period is 13.8°C.
Relative humidity
Knowing relative humidity is very important due to its influence on the formation of fog,
clouds and precipitation in a certain area. Also, relative humidity is inversely proportional tothe air temperature; which means when the temperature rises, relative humidity decreases andvice versa.

60_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Tabela 8. Average monthly and annual relative humidity for the Belgrade meteorologicalstation for the period 2000-2018 (RHMZ, Belgrade).
year/month
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Average

I
78.6
75.2
75.9
82.3
80.3
78.3
74.1
66.0
75.0
95.0
80.0
92.0
76.0
78.0
75.0
77.0
76.0
77.0
75.0
78.2

II
67.6
68.1
62.8
77.1
73.8
82.8
77.6
69.0
64.0
75.0
76.0
77.0
75.0
76.0
68.0
77.0
68.0
69.0
79.0
72.8

III
61.6
61.0
55.1
58.5
64.3
68.1
68.4
61.0
63.0
65.0
63.0
63.0
50.0
70.0
66.0
68.0
68.0
61.0
72.0
63.5

IV
57.3
64.6
62.8
55.9
67.2
60.9
66.3
44.0
63.0
53.0
67.0
54.0
59.0
58.0
69.0
56.0
57.0
59.0
56.0
59.5

V
54.5
62.9
57.3
55.5
65.0
64.8
61.1
62.0
58.0
57.0
67.0
66.0
66.0
59.0
67.0
64.0
63.0
65.0
59.0
61.8

VI
47.3
67.5
57.0
53.0
68.4
62.4
68.7
58.0
61.0
67.0
73.0
61.0
52.0
66.0
61.0
61.0
66.0
56.0
68.0
61.8

VII
50.9
66.5
61.8
62.9
62.4
67.6
55.9
46.0
57.0
60.0
66.0
59.0
50.0
52.0
65.0
48.0
59.0
49.0
69.0
58.3

VIII
44.9
61.5
68.0
49.8
69.1
75.0
70.7
59.0
55.0
60.0
61.0
55.0
41.0
54.0
66.0
53.0
66.0
50.0
61.0
58.9

IX
66.3
76.8
69.8
64.1
69.7
74.6
65.1
68.0
67.0
59.0
70.0
55.0
53.0
66.0
73.0
67.0
63.0
63.0
58.0
65.7

X
67.3
75.0
72.2
74.4
75.3
70.9
64.8
78.0
69.0
73.0
73.0
67.0
69.0
68.0
72.0
78.0
76.0
68.0
60.0
71.1

XI
68.0
79.6
68.1
76.5
76.0
75.5
69.6
76.0
69.0
78.0
68.0
78.0
72.0
76.0
74.0
70.0
72.0
77.0
74.0
73.5

XII
78.3
80.7
77.0
77.6
81.2
80.8
81.0
83.0
76.0
81.0
79.0
76.0
79.0
79.0
80.0
85.0
76.0
75.0
80.0
79.2

Annual
61.9
70.0
65.7
65.6
71.1
71.8
68.6
64.17
64.75
68.58
70.3
66.9
61.8
66.8
69.7
67.0
67.5
64.1
67.6
67.0

The mean perennial value of relative humidity for the observed period is 67.0%. The monthwith highest relative humidity values is December, with 79.2% and the month with lowest
relative humidity values is July with 58.3%.
Wind
Like other climate parameters, the wind rose is primarily affected by relief, topography, city
structure i.e. built structures, vegetation, pollution etc. In the case of Belgrade, the mostinfluential factors are the Danube, Avala and Kosmaj and other aforementioned parameters.
Frequency of winds by directions, the so-called “wind rose”, obtained using the data gatheredfrom the Vračar Meteorological Observatory (φ 4448 N λ 2028Е mnm 132), has a shape that ischaracteristic for the entire Košava area. Two directions are dominant: southeast and westnorthwest. The southeastern direction is generally known as Košava, and the west-northwest
direction is called Gornjak. It is more accurate to view these two directions as sectors, where
the first is the sector between east and south, and the second is the sector between west andnorthwest. This is due to the fact that, in different situations, during the “Košava process” thedirection of the wind may vary from eastern to southern direction. The Gornjak can blow fromwest to northwest direction.

61_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 9. Relative frequency of winds by direction in ‰ and average wind speed in m/s,
(for the 2000-2018. period)
S

SI

I

JI

J

JZ

Z

SZ

C

Relative frequency (‰)

89,8

81,7

69,3

216,3

173,7

61,3

194,8

172,9

41,4

Average speed (m/s)

2,3

2

2,1

3,4

3,0

1,9

2,3

2,4

-

Note: Frequency and wind speed data at Belgrade Observatory station are not available in the
RHMZ Yearbook for 2017.

Figure 11 Relative frequency of winds by direction and silence in ‰ and average wind speed
in m/s (for the period 2000-2018)
Based on the above mentioned and wind rose for the city of Belgrade, the air masses from the
Vinča landfill complex will move, depending on the blowing direction of the dominant wind,in the direction south-southeast/west-northwest, ie. towards the settlements of Vinča (in thesouth), ie. Slanci and Veliko selo (northwest/north).
Fog and smog
The complex topography of Belgrade has an effect on differences in types of fog and smog insome topoclimatic zones of the city. Based on the monitoring performed at the Vračar
Meteorological Observatory, according to the Atlas of the Climate of Yugoslavia for the period
1931-1960, the annual number of days with fog in Belgrade is 39. At the Zeleno brdo
Observatory types and frequency of fog correspond to “mountain” stations. During the winter,the fog is 30% more frequent at the Zeleno brdo Observatory compared to Vračar, even though
it is located quite a distance away from the sources of pollution. More frequent winter fogs at
the Zeleno Brdo are caused by the fact that at that altitude, low clouds occur ten to fifteen times
a year, and on that site the inside of the clouds registers as fog. (Source: Ecological Atlas ofBelgrade, City Institute of Public Health Belgrade, 2002).

62_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.6. DESCRIPTION OF THE FLORA AND FAUNA, NATURAL ASSETSOF SPECIAL VALUE (PROTECTED) RARE AND VULNERABLE
PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES AND THEIR HABITATS AND
VEGETATIONIn Serbia nature areas are protected based on different national legal frameworks andinternational conventions:- Protected areas - defined by the following acts: Law on National Parks (Official
Gazette of RS 33/93 and 44/93), and Law on Nature Conservation (Official Gazette of RS
36/09, and 88/10)- Emerald Network Areas are defined based on the Bern convention- Important Bird Areas (IBA) - defined by international organization BirdLife
International- Important Plant Areas (IPA) - defined by international organization Plantlife
International- Prime Butterfly Areas (PBA) – defined by various criteria (as Red books, EU Habitats
Directive 32/43, individual research etc)
- Ramsar sites – defined by global organization Wetland International based on Ramsar
Convention.
Ecological Network of Serbia is composed of Areas of Special Ecological Importance (ASCI)
and Ecological corridors.
Based on the decision of the Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, 03 number 020-670/3
of 03/30/2018, in the scope of the PDR of the Vinča sanitary landfill, there are no protectedareas for which a protection procedure has been carried out, identified ecologically significant
areas and ecological corridors of international importance for the ecological network of the
Republic of Serbia, nor recorded natural resources.
Within 5 km from the site, approx. 4.5 km to the southeast, on the opposite riverbank ofDanube, protected area Strict Nature Reserve Ivankovo is located.
Emerald network candidate site “Pančevačke ade” RS0000056 is located approx. 2.6 km to thenorth – northeast from the planned project area and is the only one located within the 5 km
from the site. Pančevačke ade are a complex system of river islands with well-developed
wetland vegetation and accompanying wetland species of fauna.

63_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 5 Emerald Network Area in vicinity of the landfill, Source: Official online GIS browserof Council of Europe (http://emerald.eea.europa.eu)
In the vicinity of the landfill, the following areas of the Ecological Network of Serbia arelocated:- Area of Special Ecological Importance “Ušće Save u Dunav”, and- Ecological corridor of international importance “Dunav i njegova zabarena/plavna
područja uzvodno i nizvodno”.
Area of special ecological importance “Ušće Save u Dunav” is located at the confluence of theriver Sava and the Danube river. It is protected for its aquatic and wetland habitats that support
a wide variety of animal species.
This area has the same boundaries as the Important Bird Area (IBA), also named “Ušće Save u
Dunav” RS017IBA. The closest development planned under the project is approximately 180
m west of the IBA / Ecological Network area. It includes protected areas Landscape of
extraordinary characteristics Veliko ratno ostrvo in Belgrade, part of the Landscape of
extraordinary characteristics Forland leve obale Dunava kod Beograda, and part of theProtected habitat area Veliko blato; all these areas are situated more than 9 km to the northwest
from the planned project site. Also, it includes the area of Emerald network candidate site
Pančevacke ade RS0000056. Ošljan oxbow ponds (Ošljanska bara) are part of the Area ofspecial ecological importance “Ušće Save u Dunav”.

64_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 13 Ecological corridor„Dunav i njegova zabarena/plavna područja uzvodno inizvodno“and area of special ecological importance„Ušće Save u Dunav“ locations
Ecological corridor of international importance “Dunav i njegova zabarena/plavna područja
uzvodno i nizvodno” is a large corridor that extends over the Danube river and parts of its
floodplain with standing water (ponds, oxbow ponds etc).
This area includes protected areas Special Nature Reserve “Bagremara”, Nature Park “Begečka
jama” and three Nature Monuments “Kamenički park”, “Ivanovačka ada”, “Ritske šume na
Mačkovom sprudu”. Also, it is overlapping with the area in the process of being proclaimed asa protected area named “Ribarsko ostrvo”, and three areas planned to be protected in the future“Bogojevački rit”, “Rit između Plavne i Bačkog Novog Sela” and “Ritovi Podunavlja”.

65_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.7. BASIC LANDSCAPE TYPES
Basic landscape features are defined with terrain, natural conditions and human activities. In awider area, which can be roughly described as 20 km buffer zone, there is four basic landscapetypes:- Agricultural landscape of Vojvodina. It is characterized with thick relief and intensively
used arable land. There is a negligible share of forests and natural areas, with the exception of
those parts along watercourses. The Danube River is the dominant water course. Visibility islimited due to relief flatness. Landscape character can be described as dominantly
anthropogenic agricultural landscape- River landscape - Danube and Sava Rivers. They are the most important line elementsof the landscape and important determinant of terrain motion. In some places along the riverbanks, embankments are constructed, but in the significant part a natural condition withbayous, river islands and wetland areas can be found.
- Intensive urbanized areas. Here stands out the Belgrade agglomeration with suburban
areas and satellite cities (e.g. Požarevac). They are carriers of anthropogenic urban landscapecharacter. Landscape is mainly characterized with dense population, a large spatial scope andnumerous infrastructural and industrial elements- Southern mosaic areas. Landscape character is determined with hilly relief covered
with mosaic mixture of small agricultural surfaces, small forests and suburban areas. Share of
agricultural surfaces is proportional with increasing distance from the City core. The area
includes suburban settlements: Grocka, Voždovac, Barajevo, Sopot, Mladenovac, Lazarevac,
Obrenovac and continues southward
Project location is settled on the crossroads of described landscapes. It is a hilly relief area
between agricultural landscape on the east and north and urbanized areas of Belgrade andPožarevac on the west and north. Southern suburban areas are about 5 km away. Alongsideeast and north is Danube stream with natural wetland habitats.
A 5 km buffer zone can be considered as the narrower area. This is an area of potential
significant visual contact with the planned project components. Narrower area is divided on
basic landscape patterns and presented in form of a map. This method has provided the basis
for a quality analysis of the structural landscape elements and the process that affects thelandscape condition.
Project site, e.g. existing landfill, is dominant landscape element. Compared to the rest of theareas, it possesses the opposite visual and character features. It represents a spatial element
perceived as a negative phenomenon. The landfill is settled on slight slope oriented towards
east. It is visible from the immediate surroundings and from east side of the buffer zone. These
are areas along the river Danube and agricultural area on east side of the Danube river. Asphaltbase is located on the southwest of the landfill, on the edge of project borders. Because of theproximity of landfill and industrial character, it can be considered a negative spatial
phenomenon.

66_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Agricultural landscape with mosaic structure surrounds the landfill. This is a mixture of small
scale agricultural areas, which are mostly orchards, meadows and areas under various stages ofnatural succession. Agriculture is an important factor of the landscape structure. The
appearance of agricultural parcels, which in this case are shaped organically in relation torelief, in a large degree influences the landscape structure and visual dynamics.
Near the more densely populated parts (Belgrade suburban settlements), locally isolated
objects can be seen. In regard to the existing landfill, they are located at a distance of 1.5 km
minimum. These are locations southward of Veliko selo end eastward of Mirijevo andKaluđerica. There is also a monastery and a graveyard about 1 km north of the landfill, andgraveyard 0.9 km southward. The described elements do not take up significant space coverageand therefore are not a significant factor of the landscape.
Visual contact of the mentioned settlements with the landfill is prevented due to the hilly relief,vegetation and microlocation of the landfill site.
Danube river with riverside is a landscape element with natural character. They represent a
linear element of landscape structure. A large area of intensive agriculture is on the east side ofDanube River. Landscape image is composed of agricultural areas and macadam roads on a flat
relief. Urban structures of Starčevo and Pančevo are settled on the north side. Due to relief
flatness, significant visual contact is stronger towards hilly area in the west.
Industrial landscape of Pančevo is located outside the 5 km buffer zone and can be described asanthropogenic landscape with strong industrial character. As such, it’s a spatial phenomenon
that causes negative visual and symbolic connotations.
The following photos represent heads of landscape features of the area described:

Figure 14 Landscape west of project location

67_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 15 Example of natural succession at the base of a landfill, west of the project site

Figure 16 Characteristic suburban area - Kaluđerica, about 4 km west of the project site

Figure 17 Specific landscape of Veliko Selo, about 3 km north of the project site

Figure 18 Specific landscape and river banks of the Danube, about 1.5 km east of the projectsite

68_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 19 View from the landfill towards the Danube and river banks

Figure 20 Specific landscape of intensively developed agricultural land about 4km east of the
project site69_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.8. IMMOVABLE CULTURAL GOODS
Within the administrative area of Belgrade, which includes the area of Grocka municipality,
there are about 350 protected immovable cultural goods. In addition, there are numerous
cultural heritage sites at lower levels of protection. The highest concentration of cultural goods
is in the central part of Belgrade and their number decreases towards the peripheral areas.
Given its very favorable geographic position in the immediate vicinity of the Danube, theterritory of today's Grocka municipality has since ancient times been a perfect place for theformation of human settlements. The first and oldest traces of settlements in this area date backto the Neolithic - New Stone Age. The remains of settlements from this period were found atseveral archaeological sites in the settlements of Grocka municipality. Certainly, one of themost important, by which an entire culture was named, is the archaeological site Belo Brdo in
Vinča - a cultural heritage - archaeological site that has the status of significant importance for
the Republic of Serbia (Decision of the Bureau No. 653/5 from 10 November 1965, Cultural
resource of extraordinary importance, Decision, "Off. Gazette of the SRS" No. 14/79). The
archaeological site of Belo Brdo in Vinča is located on the right bank of the Danube, near thearea covered by the Plan. The Belo Brdo archaeological site is approximately 3km away fromthe Vinča landfill complex, southeastward. The precise location of the Veteranska vila
(Veteran's Villa) was not determined by the competent Institute for Immovable Cultural
Goods.
The project’s impact on the cultural and historical facilities and sites (cultural goods) can beviewed as direct and indirect. Given the concept of the project in question and possible effects
on the elements of cultural heritage, 2 zones of influence are defined.
- Direct influence is every physical destruction of facilities/sites within the project area,
as well as any violation of context of cultural heritage elements that are outside the projectarea’s borders. Given the nature of the project, the zone within 100 meters from the projectboundaries is considered a zone of direct impact. Hereinafter, the area of direct impact ismarked as Zone 1.
- Violating the integrity of the related area of cultural goods is considered to be indirect
impact, and this refers to the area at a distance of 100 meters to 2000 meters from the project
borders. Taking into account the final appearance of the planned project and the clear view on
the area, this is an area in which the negative impacts are possible on the cultural context ofarchaeological and ethnological sites and zones and historical urban, rural and religious
complexes. Hereinafter, the zone of indirect impact is marked as Zone 2.
Within zone 1 and 2 there is no UNESCO sites. (www.srbija.com, Serbian UNESCO World
Heritage Sites). The site of the landfill in Vinča is part of the former borders of the Roman
Empire.
Within Zone 1 (under the project boundaries), there is a registered archaeological site
“Ošljane”, defined as a cultural good, enjoying preliminary protection under the Cultural
Property Act. The place is in the valley of the Ošljanski potok (Ošljan stream), west of thevillage Vinča - Veliko Selo, on a gentle slope on the right bank of the stream. The location is
known to archaeologists because of accidental discovery of Roman pottery. In 1975 the70_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Belgrade City Museum carried out exploratory excavations of a smaller scope. Archaeologicalfinds contain remains of the Veteranska vila from the second to the third century.

Figure 21 Location of the project in the Drawing - Planned use of the area, 2.1 - General
Regulatory Plan for the Construction of the City of Belgrade - Unit XX, Municipality ofGrocka, Palilula, Zvezdara and Voždovac (Kaluđerica, Leštane, Boleč, Vinča and Ritopek
settlements) ("Official Gazette of the City") Belgrade ”No. 66/17)
It is also important to note that the location of the archaeological site Ošljane, in the conditions
issued by the Institute for Protection of Cultural Monuments, is spatially very imprecisely
shown, without clearly defined location of the described Veteran’s Villa. The question is where
the detected object is located within the defined zone.

71_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 22 Spatial location of the archaeological site "Ošljane“
Within the Zone 2, there is an archeological site at the location of today's Monastery of Holy
Archbishop Stephan (Slanci Monastery). It's located 1.2 km north of the existing landfill site.
New complex was built in 1960. The site was previously used for religious purposes, and dueto the conquest of the Ottoman Empire site, it was completely destroyed on several occasions.
Manastirsko groblje (Monastery cemetery) is located about 0.7 km northeast of the monastery.
The monastery and cemetery do not have visual and functional contact with the project site due
to relief and vegetation impediments.
Staro “seosko” groblje (Old “village” cemetery) is located about 1 km southward from the
project site borders. This is a sacral element of local significance.
According to General Plan of Belgrade 2021 ("Official journal of the City of Belgrade", No.
27/03, 25/05, 34/07, 63/09 and 70/14) there are two cultural goods (archaeological sites) about
1 km northeast of the existing landfill, on Gornje Ošljane territory.

72_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.9. DATA ON THE POPULATION DENSITY AND CONCENTRATION
According to the Census from 2011, there are 1,659,440 inhabitants in the City of Belgrade.
The total population increased by 5% in the period 2002 – 2011. Average population density in
the City of Belgrade is 514 inhabitants/km2 and is higher than the average population density in
Serbia.
The municipality of Grocka has the area of 289 km2 and 83,907 inhabitants (2011 Census
data). According to that Census, Vinča settlement had 6,779 inhabitants (358 inhabitants/km2).
There are 1831 households in the Vinča settlement, and the average number of members perhousehold is 3.18. The Vinča settlement area is 18.95 km2.
In northern part of the planned construction complex, in the proximity of the current landfill
fence, an informal settlement is formed. The settlement is populated by families collecting,classifying and selling secondary raw materials from the landfill.
In this area 17 households (85 people) are identified, and their members were present at theirhouseholds in the period running from 2014 to June 8th, 2016. Out of these, there are 41 men
and 44 women; 38 underage children (under 18), 47 adults – noting that 6 (six) persons did nothave any valid documentation based on which their age could be determined. The Action Plan
envisages the resettlement of families who live in an informal settlement at the location of the
Vinča landfill - . which is described in more detail in Chapter 5.1.

2.10. DATA ON EXISTING COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIALOBJECTS, FACILITIES OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUPSTRUCTURE
The asphalt base and complex of the Institute for Nuclear Sciences “Vinča” are importantcommercial objects for the project near the Vinča landfill complex.
Larger industrial areas are located in the western parts of Belgrade. In relation to the landfill,they are 5 km southwest, west and northwest. The high-voltage switchyard is located 3 km
northwest from the landfill site.
The most significant industrial area is located in the southern part of Pančevo, where an oil
refinery, chemical industry factories and a river port can be found. In relation to the landfill,they are about 8 km northeast.
Residential buildings are in the suburbs of Vinča, Veliko selo, Slanci and Mirijevo. The listed
settlements are with high density of housing, and the nearest inhabited households are morethan 1000 m away from the landfill complex in Vinča 1.

1

As a reference, we can cite the decree „Official Gazette of RS“, No. 54/9. This regulation
stipulates that the distance from the nearest settlement must be at least 1,500 m and the distancefrom individual houses must be at least 500 m..
73_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The traffic connection to the Vinča landfill has been realized through Beogradska Street fromthe Smederevski Put diversion. According to the General Plan of Belgrade 2021 ("Off. Journalof the City of Belgrade", No. 27/03, 25/05, 34/07 and 63/09), Smederevski put is equal to thehighway road, and Beogradska Street and road to the landfill are equal to the second-classstreets. Total annual traffic from the landfill complex to the public roads is around 135,348
vehicles.
Within the border of DRP, a TS of 10/0,4 kV "Beogradska bb, landfill", an underground gridof power lines of 10 kV, overhead and underground lines of 1 kV, as well as public
illumination installations (PI), have been constructed. The existing power lines have been
constructed under the free space, following the corridor of the existing traffic areas. For
existing overhead lines of 35kV, a 30 m long protective corridor (15m from the line axis) has
been provided.
The Vinča landfill complex is at a distance of about 2200 m from the existing water pipeline
route Ø200, which is located at the base of the Smederevski Put. The traffic connection from
Smederevski Put to the Vinča Landfill Complex has a Ø100mm pipeline of about 450 m inlength.
The sewage network does not exist from the Smederevski Put to the landfill complex.
In this area there is no gas pipeline network and gas stations (GMRS, MRS, etc.).
The landfill complex is connected to an automatic telephone exchange (ATE) " Kaluđerica".
The access telecommunication network is made by underground cables.
Supstructure facilities (catering facilities, galleries, exhibition, congress, entertainment
facilities, etc.) are located at a distance of more than 1000 m from the Vinča complex.

74_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.11. DATA ON HEALTH CARE IN SERBIA
According to the data published by the Institute of Public Health of Serbia (Source: Health
Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Serbia 2016) the most common causes of death in2016, (if the group Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings (4.9%) is
excluded) belong to the following diseases groups:- Diseases of the circulatory system 51.8%- Neoplasms 21.8%- Diseases of the respiratory system 4.8%
- Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases 3.3%
- Diseases of the digestive system 3.2%
In the year 2015, the most common causes of death, if the group Symptoms, signs andabnormal clinical and laboratory findings (5.4%) is excluded, belong to the following diseases
groups:- Diseases of the circulatory system 52.7%- Neoplasms 20.6%- Diseases of the respiratory system 5.3%
- Diseases of the digestive system 3.2%
- Injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes 2.8%
Chronic non-communicable diseases: cardiovascular diseases, malignant tumors, diabetes,
obstructive lung disease, injury and poisoning, mental health disorders and other chronic
diseases dominate for decades in national pathology.
Cardiovascular diseases and malignant tumors accounted for more than two thirds of all deathsin Serbia in 2016. More than half of all lethal outcomes (51.7%) are the consequence of dying
from the diseases of circulatory system and almost one in five persons who died (21.3%) was
the victim of malignant tumor.
In Serbia 2.8% population died because of injury and poisoning, 3.1% as a consequence ofdiabetes complications, while 2.6 % died as a consequence of obstructive lung disease. In
period 2007 to 2016 in Serbia was observed 2.6% a slight increase in overall mortality due tohigher mortality from leading chronic noncommunicable diseases. In the observed period, thehighest mortality increase was associated with malignant diseases (10.3%), diabetes (10.0%)
and obstructive lung disease (7.4%). The lowest decrease of mortality was recorded for injury
and poisoning (22.7%) and circulatory diseases (5.4%).
Even though increased death rate can partly be explained by better diagnostics and recognitionof cause of death, it is a fact that majority of population in Serbia aches and dies out ofcoronary and heart diseases. It is known that 75% of heart diseases are caused by conventionalrisks in a relation with the life style - smoking, hypertension, high level of cholesterol,
improper nutrition, obesity and physical inactivity. In addition, many socio-economic studies
indicate a link between low socio-economic status and heart and coronary diseases.

75_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________In 2016, 52,102 people in Serbia died from cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovascular diseases
account 51.7% of all causes of death and are the leading cause of death in Serbia. Women weredying from cardiovascular diseases more often (54.3%) than men (45.7%). Ischemic heartdiseases and cerebrovascular diseases are leading causes of death in this group of diseases.
In the observed ten-year period, death rates for cardiovascular diseases in Serbia decreased
from 780.4 per 100,000 to 738.2 per 100,000 inhabitants. In the period between 2007-2016,mortality rates in women declined by 5.2%, and in men by 5.7%.
Between 2005 and 2014 in Central Serbia, the average number of people diagnosed withmalignant diseases was 25,834 annually, while 14,755 persons died from cancer yearly.
According to data from Cancer Registry of Central Serbia, in 2014, 26,362 new cases (422malignant tumors) were registered, and 15,152 died of cancer.
The City of Belgrade has one of the highest mortality rates registered (men 178.5 per 100,000/
women 121.3 per 100,000).
According to the Cancer Register data, men were mostly diagnosed with and died of cancer ofbronchus and lung, colon, rectum and prostate cancer. In women, the most frequent sites ofmalignant tumors were breast, bronchus and lungs, colon and rectum. At the same time,
women were mostly victims of breast cancer, bronchus and lung, as well as colon and rectum
cancer (Source: Health Statistical Yearbook Of Republic Of Serbia, 2016).
According to the Statistical Annual Report of the Republic of Serbia, in the period from 2011
to 2016, in the health system of the Republic of Serbia, the number of doctors and dentists
decreased by 1049 and 542. The number of pharmacists decreased by 12761. The population
per doctor increased slightly, while the number of residents per hospital bed decreased
compared to 2011. The coverage of vaccinated persons against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis
was 94.1% and from poliomyelitis to 94.2%. MMR vaccination was performed in 81% ofcases, while infant BCG vaccination coverage was 98%.
Compared to 2015, there were 837 newly diagnosed patients with all forms of tuberculosis in
2016, representing a drop of 125 cases. The highest number of newly registered patients wasnoticed in the age group of 60 years and older. The WHO Global Tuberculosis Program andthe Directly Supervised Treatment Strategy were implemented in 2002. These data werecollected by the Institute of Public Health of Serbia "Dr Milan Jovanovic Butut".

76_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

3.0. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Landfill works will take place in stages, which dynamic is conditioned by the construction of a
new landfill in stages. The construction of the new landfill is planned in three phases regarding
the disposal of waste material. The mentioned works by phases are determined on the basis of
the required technological units of the landfill operation.
Phase one of the new landfill construction is planned for a period of one year from the
beginning of works on the landfill and includes a transitional period, the so-called. temporary
landfill (interim landfill). The first phase of construction of a new landfill involves:- Making the bottom of the new landfill and the necessary layers at the bottom andslopes, the drainage system for this phase, system for the evacuation of atmospheric water fromthe body outside the temporary landfill, as well as the construction of biothorns for that phase,- Complex entrance construction with all planned structures and equipment for entrance
and exit control, measuring waste quantities and directing vehicles to the waste treatment
platforms,- Construction of the roads Nova 1, Nova 5, the section towards the entrance and exit to
the EfW plant, Nova 4, public utility road 3, public utility road 5,- Construction of the upper platform with lagoons,- Construction of the lower platform with lagoons,- Construction of the CDW platform,- Construction of the operating platform,- Construction of the LTP,
- Construction of the outer perimeter canal for collection of atmospheric water from thesouthern part of the basin,- Construction of part of the inert waste landfill.
Phase two of landfill construction is planned after completion of Phase 1, in duration of 2.5
years, and includes:- Construction of the bottom of the new landfill on the surface of the excavation of thisphase, emplacement of required layers at the bottom and on the slopes and construction of adrainage system for this phase, a system for evacuation of atmospheric water out of the landfill
body and out of the landfill, partition cassettes separating the interim landfill from the Phase 2
landfill, Phase 2 biotrns and biogas collection network,- Construction of the outer perimeter canal for collection of atmospheric water from thenorthern and western part of the basin,- Construction of the remaining part of the inert waste landfill.
Treća faza izgradnje nove deponije je planirana nakon završetka druge faze u trajanju od 22
godine i obuhvata:- Construction of the bottom of the landfill, emplacement of required layers at the bottom
and on the slopes and construction of a drainage system for this phase, a system for evacuationof atmospheric water out of the landfill body and out of the landfill, partition cassettes
separating the Phase 3 landfill from the Phase 2 landfill, Phase 3 biotrns and biogas collection
network,- Completion of construction of the outer perimeter canal for atmospheric water from thenorthern and western part of the basin,
77_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________- After completion of the third phase, the so-called buffer zone remains as a free, sparearea that will enable the potential deposition of new quantities of municipal waste.
The New landfill Project foresees the following waste disposal plan, which will be adapted tothe actual amount of waste generated during operation:
From 2020, by mid-2021, a transitional period, it is expected that 765.000 tons of municipal
solid waste will be disposed directly into temporary cassettes on the sanitary landfill, with a
net capacity of about 722.000 m3.
From mid-2021 to mid-2024, it is expected that 170.000 tons of waste will be depositedannually in cassettes at the landfill for "Untreated waste 1", a net capacity of about 480.000
m3 and 88.000 tons of residues after treatment of waste at the EfW plant will be disposed incassettes at the landfill for "Residues 1", with a net capacity of about 175.000 m3.
From mid-2024 to mid-2046, it is expected that 170.000 tons of waste will be deposited incassettes at the landfill for "Untreated waste 2", a net capacity of about 3.530.000 m3 and88.000 tons of residues after treatment of waste at the EfW plant will be disposed in cassettes
at the landfill for "Residues 2", with a net capacity of about 1.300.000 m3.

Figure 6 Layout of the municipal waste landfill complex in Vinča(Source: IDP Book 7.1 Technological Design, Energoprojekt-Hidroinženjering, 2019)78_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

3.1. DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES, PLANNED PRODUCTIONPROCESS OR ACTIVITIES, THEIR TECHNOLOGICAL AND OTHER
CHARACTERISTICS
In this study, based on the substrates used, the following basic contents and facilities will be
addressed:

1. Control zone at the entrance:- Supervisory station- Weighbridges- Radioactivity detection system- Wheel washing system (belongs to this zone, but is not positioned in it)

2. CDW plant platform:- Administrative building (office, sanitary and storeroom container)- Plateau of the crushing - CDW plant (storage, treatment and separating of contruction waste)- Surface for depositing raw material (construction non-hazardous waste)- Surface area for disposal of the finished product (fractions from the CDW plant)- Parking and internal road at the platform

3. New landfill:- 3a. Temporary (interim) sanitary landfill for municipal waste- 3a.Sanitary landfill for untreated waste- 3a. Landfill for residues produced after waste treatment in EfW plant- 3b. Inert waste landfill- 3c. Torch system

4. Operation platform (technical maintenance):- Administrative building- Workshop with vehicles washing area
- Storage of hazardous materials- Diesel fuel pump station- Storage/container for hazardous waste (4 items)- Parking: mehanizacije, dostavnih vozila, kamiona i putnička vozila- Parking: mechanization, delivery vehicles, trucks and passanger vehicles- Sedimentation tank/Separator of light petroleum products- Facility for treatment of sanitary-foul wastewater (WWTP)

5. Upper platform:- System for collection and evacuation of atmospheric water- System for collection and evacuation of leachate water

6. Lower platform:- System for collection and evacuation of atmospheric water- System for collection and evacuation of leachate water- 6a. Zone for leachate treatment plant (LTP)

7. Protective dam of the old landfill body (support structure)
Of the accompanying contents, the following are planned:- Power transformer stations,- Access and internal roads, internal and temporary roads,- Protective greenery etc.

79_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

1. Control zone at the entrance
The existing entrance to the Vinča landfill complex is enabled from the access road, at a
distance of about 400m from the junction with the road to the Vinča Institute for Nuclear
Sciences. At the entrance there is a doorman’s booth and a canopy.
Design documents of the New landfill with accompanying facilities envisage all existing
utilities, tubular culverts for rain sewer Ø600, old asphalt and dirt roads, prefabricated andmasonry structures and fence to be removed i.e. they shall be demolished and disassembled
and all the existing canals for atmospheric water drainage at Vinča landfill shall bebackfilled. (Source: IDP Book 3/1 Design of hydrotechnical installations, Energoprojekt
Hidroinženjering, May 2019).
The existing pavement structure is demolished mechanically, layer by layer. Bulldozers,
graders, loaders, etc. are used for demolition.
The newly designed solution for the entrance into the landfill complex is moving towards thesouthwest, by about 500 m from the current situation.
At the very entrance into the landfill complex, there will be a barrier gate. From the gate,
about 180 m long asphalt road leads to the control zone, which comprises the control area
and the truck wheel scales (i.e. weighbridges).

Figure 7 Layout of the Control zone at the entrance (Source: IDP Book 3/1 Hydrotechnical
Installations Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)80_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Barrier gate
The barrier gate shall be installed at the entrance into the landfill complex. The barrier gate
will consist of four parts - two parts at the entrance and two parts at the exit from the landfill
complex. The gates for the vehicles and pedestrians have been envisaged at the entrance/exit.
Gate for the vehicles passing in one direction, shall consist of two leafs - each leaf shall be
3.5 m long and 2.0 m high. The steel structure made of steel sections, with the infilling madeof flat profiled iron and the wire mesh is foreseen. The gate will be opened, closed andlocked manually. The entry/exit barriers shall be installed at the entrance into the landfill
complex itself, immediately after the gate.
Control Zone at the Entrance
Control zone at the entrance into the landfill complex comprises the control area and the truck
wheel scales. Three prefabricated small houses are located within the control area (two of them
are joined and one is separate). Within joined houses, the doorman’s booth, control panels,
vehicles control system, video surveillance control room, office spaces, kitchenette, toilets andthe common rooms for the drivers, are located.
A separate prefabricated small house is intended for providing general services to the truck
drivers. This house consists of: work room, rest room, wardrobe, storage room and toilet.
In order to enable direct communication with the drivers of the vehicles, 3600 visibility shall beenabled from these small houses.

Truck Scales (Weighbridges)

81_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

There are four truck scales planned in the control zone, two for the trucks arriving at thelandfill complex and two for the trucks leaving the landfill complex. The truck scales enable
control of waste flows - both of the waste arriving at the landfill complex and of the waste
leaving Vinča landfill complex.
The wheel scales shall be raised from the ground surface and shall be able to perform weighing
in both directions - in case of failure of one scale.
Length of the scale amounts to 18 m, its maximum capacity amounts to 60 tons and the accessramp has to provide the maximum inclination of 5%.
Consoles of the truck scales are electronically connected with the vehicles control computer
system, thereby enabling the operation without staff. In addition to the weight and type of thewaste at the entrance to /exist from the landfill complex, the console also records andmemorizes the scale number, the date and the time of transaction, the vehicles plates number,name of the company which supplies/takes over the waste, the unit price and the total price.
Deleting or correction of the data which entered the system, shall not be enabled.

The approximate technical characteristics of the weighbridge (to a reduced extent):- weighbridge dimensions 3 x 18 m,- height of the weighbridge structure 22~37 cm,- weight measurement range 400 kg - 60.000 kg and the smallest scale division is 20 kg- temperature range: - 10°C do + 40°C
- weighbridge surface is made of the ribbed sheet metal, in order to prevent slippage ofthe vehicles- weighbridge is in accordance with the standard from the Directorate for Measures andPrecious Metals…

Slika 26. Weighbridges in the control zone (Source: IDP Book 3/1 Hydrotechnical Installations
Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)82_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Radioactivity detection
Having in mind that storing of the hazardous matters, including the radioactive matters, has notbeen foreseen within the landfill complex, detection and preventing the entry of such matters is
mandatory. The radioactivity detection system with the alarm and with the appropriate
software shall be installed at the entrance of incoming truck scales.
The system shall be equipped with several levels of alarm, which will be determined for eachdetector, in accordance with the radiation level. In case of radioactivity detection, the rotation
signal installed next to the truck scales shall be activated, as well as the audible alarm installedin the vicinity of scales and in the command booth. A typical configuration of the controlmeasurement zone is shown on the figure below:

Figure 27 Symbolic representation of the measurement zone configuration with theradioactivity detection system
Wheel washing system
Immediately before the roundabout, in the zone of Nova 4 and Nova 5 roads, before leaving
the complex and measuring weight at the exit of the landfill complex, it is envisaged to wash
the truck wheels with water. The wheel washing system is situated in a concrete canal, at thebottom of which a ribbed structure will be installed. Under the ribbed structure, mechanicalseparation / shaking of accumulated mud, waste, etc on tires. is carried out under the weightof the vehicle. Water must be added regularly, in order to maintain the level suitable forwheel washing.
Water intended for washing of the vehicles is supplied to the entrance zone by DN100 mm
pipeline, from the lagoon for the atmospheric water, which is located on the Upper platform.
83_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

After discharging, the water from the wheel washing is conveyed to the separator located on
the CDW platform.
Atmospheric water discharge system from the Control zone at the entrance
The newly designed system for the removal of atmospheric water from the inlet zone of thelandfill complex includes line grids and pipes that collect atmospheric water and oily
atmospheric water. All collected water from the entrance area is channeled to a separator on
the CDW platform. This canal also collects surface water from the escarpment to the CDW
platform.
The oil separator with the sedimentation tank, which is located on the CDW platform, has thecapacity of 130 l/s.

Figure 28 Scheme of atmospheric water discharge system from the Control zone at theentrance (Source: IDP Book 3/1 Hydrotechnical Installations Design, Energoprojekt
Hidroinženjering, May, 2019.)
Telecommunication and Signaling functional units of the Control zone at the entrance
Telecommunication and Signaling functional units of the Control zone at the entrance(Source: IDP Book 5/2 Telecommunication and Signalling Installations Design,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019) are:- Electronic communication network (ECN)- Video monitoring system (VMS)- Fire alarm system (FAS)- Fixed telephony system- Telecommunication (TC) connections- TC infrastructure84_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Electronic communication network
A unique electronic communication network (ECN) is formed on the landfill complex level,that will enable an integrated flow of all types of messages: within the individual landfill
facilities, among the facilities, as well as towards the external telecommunication service
operators.
The central devices of ECN network are installed, together with TC terminal (for external
connections of the landfill), in the dedicated area within the Entrance Area. This site connectswith cables to all other facilities within the complex that need TC connections.
Video Monitoring System
On the landfill level a video monitoring system is foreseen, which will enable security
surveillance of: the waste unloading areas (new landfill, inert waste landfill), the platforms(operating landfill, leachate treatment, biogas treatment, construction waste), mobile
installations and around the fence.
Functioning of the video surveillance system as a whole, is enabled by the central server &storage that accquires the signals from the video cameras and records them in predefinedtime intervals, in case of alarm states and when necessary. These data are stored forminimum 30 days.
At the entrance to the landfill, video surveillance will be provided to cover the entrance gate
and truck wheel scales. Two cameras are installed for each scale: one for license plate
recognition and the other for load control.
The cameras are installed on the lighting poles or the portals intended for traffic
signalization, at the height of approx. 6 m. All these cameras will be connected with the local
ECN network
Fire Alarm System
Role of the fire alarm system is automatic fire detection and alarming. It is connected to ECN
network, for the purpose of integration of all security systems and for further connection withhigher level surveillance and control systems. Fire alarm system is organized with four FA(Fire Alarm) units. Fire detection central unit will be installed in the Gatekeepers room, at an
easily noticeable and accessible place.
Optical and thermal detectors, as well as manual call points and alarm sirens are foreseen forautomatic fire detection and alarming. The basic type of detectors is optical smoke detector,
that reacts to visible light and dark smokes.
At the points where fast temperature rise is expected, the thermal fire detectors, which react tothe temperature change speed or to exceeding of the fixed, maximum allowable temperature,
will be used. Each fire detector will have two levels of fire detection (warning and alarm).

85_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________All detectors, as well as all the system elements, are permanently monitored and any
deterioration of the characteristics will be displayed by the audible warning and theappropriate textual caption.
Addressable automatic fire detectors and manual call points are foreseen, so that eachelement has its own address which undoubtedly defines its position within the system. Bymeans of two-wire addressable loops, the addressable fire detectors are connected to thecentral unit. Each addressable loop connects several addressable elements: automatic
detectors, manual call points and transponders.
Automatic fire detectors will be distributed over all the premises in which the fire load is
expected. Manual call points and alarm sirens are installed nearby the exits and along theevacuation routes.
In case of fire hazard, two-stage local alarming has been foreseen: electronic flashlight andalarm sirens.

Figure 29 Schematic display of the FA equipment layout in the Control zone (Source: IDP
Book 5/2 Telecommunication and Signalling Installations Design, Energoprojekt
Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)86_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Fixed telephony system
An IP PBX, with a capacity of up to 50 phones, allows voice communication of staff inside andoutside the Vinča Landfill. The telephone exchange is located in the Administrative Buildingon the Operating Platform. Two IP phones in EVA containers are connected via local ECN.
ECN installations with RJ45 connectors are common to telephone connections.
Telecommunication Connections
In compliance with the guidelines for application of modern technologies for the new
business facilities, the FTTB (FibreTo The Building) concept has been adopted. The accessfibre optic cable will be laid up to the TC terminal within the landfill complex. This terminal
should enable connection of the landfill with the external telephone and broadband networks(Ethernet, IPTV, xDSL) of the selected telecommunication operator. Cabinet with active andpassive equipment will be installed within the dedicated area in the Entrance Area.
TC infrastructure
Two PE pipes are planned for the installation of optic cables, Ø50 mm along all internalroads. except on the parts towards the circular flow where 4 pipes are foreseen. As a rule,these pipes are placed in a joint trench with power cables for electrical lighting. Inside thefacilities, installation cables run along the lattice cable girders, along the duct rails and on thewalls using cable clamps.
Water supply for the complex
The main parameter for dimensioning of water supply to the landfill is the inlet pressure fromthe city water supply network, which amounts to 4.5 bar. The existing reservoir within thelandfill complex is not in function, but will remain as a reserve, as defined in the
Amendments to the Detailed Regulation Plan of Vinča sanitary landfill.
The water quantity that can be provided by Belgrade Waterworks and Sewerage to Vinča
municipal waste landfill complex is 24 l/s (charging at night, between 22 - 06 h). The supply
pipeline is planned with PEHD Ø200 mm. In front of the entrance to the landfill a new shaft
is foreseen.
A PEHD pipe Ø200mm runs from the new shaft to the newly designed tank for sanitary andFF water. The tank consists of two chambers: with the capacity of V=50 m3 for sanitarywater and with the capacity of V=72 m3 for firefighting water. Having in mind that thepressure of 4.5 bar at the landfill entrance is sufficient to ensure adequate pressure even forthe most distant consumers, the sanitary and firefighting water tanks (old and newly
designed) only serve as a reserve, in case of failure of water supply from the city watersupply network.

87_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 30. Sanitary and firefighting water tank (Source: IDP Book 3/1 Hydrotechnical
Installations Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
City water is supplied to the complex through a valve chamber containing a T-manifold,where one branch separates toward EfW plant for sanitary and FF water, as well as FF water
to the landfill and the other branch supplies sanitary water to the landfill and the tank. Behindeach branch there is an electromagnetic flowmeter.

88_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The valve chamber also contains booster pumps for sanitary and FF water, which should
ensure pressure for landfill consumers in case of failure of water supply from the city watersupply network.
Firefighting water shall be transported from the valve chamber to hydrants on the CDW
platform and on the LOP platform.
The following pipelines branch off from the sanitary water pipeline: DN 25 for consumers at
the entrance, DN 50 for consumers at the CDW platform and DN 50 for consumers at the LOP
platform. After the LOP platform, a pipeline DN 50 shall supply technical water to the LTP.
Characteristics of firefighting water pump are: Q=22.22 l/s, H=16 m, P=4.0 kW and of
sanitary water pump: Q=4.2 l/s, H=39 m, P=1.1 KW
The firefighting water tank will be filled in two independent manners: directly from the watersupply network, through DN 200 pipe, and from the atmospheric water lagoon on the Upper
platform.
This pond will collect surface atmospheric water from the entire new landfill (this excludes
leachate from the landfill body).
A diagram showing the complex’s water supply system is shown in the Figure below.

89_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 31 Scheme of Water Supply to Landfill Complex (Source: IDP Book 3/1 Hydrotechnical
Installations Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)90_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Foul water sewerage system at the complex
A foul water sewerage network is envisaged for collection and discharge of foul wastewater(from sanitary blocks) from the landfill complex that collects water from the following
facilities (platforms, units, cadastral parcels):- EfW plant (the subject of another project),- Entrance-control zone,- CDW platform,- LOP platform,- construction site.
The planned sewerage network consists of PVC sewerage pipes DN 160 and DN 200 for
sewers collecting foul wastewater from the above-mentioned platforms and facilities.
Foul water sewerage runs from sanitary blocks in the landfill entrance part, along thecentreline of Nova 1 road and further across the roundabout, where it collects wastewaterfrom the EfW platform and construction site along the edge of Nova 5 road. Then the foulwater sewerage runs along the edge of Nova 4 road, where it collects foul water from the
CDW platform. After the CDW platform, the foul water sewerage runs along the same route,along the edge of Nova 4 road to the operating platform, where all foul wastewater arecollected. The total amount of foul water from the complex is about 5 l/s.
After collection of all foul waters, they are channelled to the wastewater treatment plant i.e.
to the package unit for treatment of foul wastewater located within the Operating platform.
The device capacity is 100 PE. Treated water is discharged into the perimeter rain water
canal, which transports these waters to the lagoons on the Upper platform.
2. Platform of the CDW plant
The platform for storage and treatment of construction waste is planned across the EfW and
BEP plant, on the construction plot KP6-2. The CDW plant platform consists of thefollowing units:- Entrance road – asphalted- Administrative building (on concrete slab):• Office container• Sanitary container• Storage container• Parking spaces (3 PS)- Plateau of the crusher plant• Process area – CDW plant (screening, crushing) – concrete slab
• Areas for storage of raw materials – gravel area
• Area for disposal of end product - gravel area
- Internal gravel road91_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

CDW plant platform is going to be fenced and equipped with access control. In addition to thefence, the areas of protective greenery (aprox. 950 m2) are foreseen. Platform is aprox. 17.500
m2.
Recapitulation and purpose of surfaces on the CDW platform
Spatial-functional unit K2
Construction plot (fenced)
Concrete slab for Administrative building
Concrete slab for Process area
Asphalt area – access road
Green area
Gravel area – for disposal of raw materials and fractions
Surfaces for the obtained fractions on the CDW plant
Crushed/sorted material (gravel)
Raw material
fraction 0-30mm
fraction 32-80mm
fraction 80-150mm

Approx. 21.00 m²
Approx. 17.500 m²
Approx. 300 m²
Approx. 1700 m²
Approx. 1700 m²
Approx. 950 m²
Approx. 13.000 m²
Approx. 1.150 m²
Approx. 5.800 m²
250 m²150 m²150 m²Administrative building
The administrative building on the plateau consists of three containers with same dimensions:
Office container, Sanitary container and Storage container. Containers are 6.06x2.44 m baseand 2.59 m high. They are installed on a reinforced concrete slab 0.15 m thick, over a layerof lean concrete and a layer of compacted gravel.
Office container is an office, sanitary container is equipped with dressing room and sanitary
blocks. Storage container is intended for holding spare parts in assembly racks.
WC
Lavabo

Sto

Sto

Tuš

Tuš

Figure 32 Office and sanitary container (Source: IDP Book 7/3 Technological design,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019.)

92_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 33 Disposition of the Administrative building with parking (Source: IDP Book 7/3
Technological design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
Plateau of the crusher plant
Process area (screening, crushing and loading) of the CDW platform is approx.1 700 m2, madeof reinforced concrete slab. The slab is basically hexagonal. The length of the hexagonal slab
side is 25.403 m, the diameter of inscribed circle is 44.00 m, and the circumscribed radiusdiameter is 50.81 m. The thickness of the slab is 0.40 m. The slab is laid through a layer of leanconcrete and a layer of compact gravel. The foundation has a surface drop of ~ 2% defined byelevation marks.

Figure 34 Plot Layout of the CDW platform (Source: IDP Book 7/3 Technological design,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
Construction and demolition waste material is delivered by trucks. The trucks are being
measured with weighbridges, located at the entrance into the complex. The weighbridges’
capacity is of 60 tons and 18x3 m dimensions. Once the trucks have unloaded their material,
the empty trucks go again over the weighbridge, in order to measure and record the flows of93_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

material in and out of the CDW plant. The scale support equipment is placed in the room next
to the scale.
Visual inspection of waste in open containers is done with cameras. In the case of closed
containers, the truck goes to a designated container detection section to carry out a load check.
Radioactivity detection is also performed at the entrance to the complex.
A temporary storage (buffer) space is provided at the entrance of the CDW Plant Platform.
Trucks coming from wheel scales unload construction waste in this part, where approx. 7,000
m3 (two storage sites of approx. 3,500 m3 each) can be stored. Additional storage spaces areprovided on the left side of the CDW plant plateau, space for approx. 15,500 m3.
Process area – CDW plant
The following equipment is foreseen for the operation of the CDW plant:- An excavator with a waste shredder for pre-sorting of the incoming material- Two loaders for transportation of incoming material suitable for crushing plant- A mobile crushing plant with a sifter to separate fine fractions, conveyors fortransporting materials to the open air temporary storage areas, magnetic separator to remove
ferrous metal waste.
Basic concept of the process of the CDW plant consists of:--

Reception of construction waste
Basic sorting of construction waste
Crushing and screening of inert waste into different size ranges, in order to produce:• granulates• material for road base course• backfill materials, etc.
Storage of sorted material on a dedicated area

The process concept of a CDW plant can, with the time of exploitation, be adapted to current
market requirements, either in relation to the construction waste inflow or in terms of changing
the demand of a particular fraction in terms of quality and / or quantity. The evolution of theprocess would in this context be realized by modifying the crushing and sifting equipment
according to new requirements with respect to the granulation of individual fractions and / or
the redistribution of the reserved volumes for receiving and storing sorted material.
Three fractions are separated at the plant and the largest fractions are returned to the crusher
inlet.

94_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Characteristics of material (construction non-hazardous waste) delivered to the CDW plant:-

Material: construction and demolition waste and soil (from excavation)
Entrance material: 0 - 600 mm
Capacity: 200.000 tons per year
Moisture: max. 4 %,Delivered construction waste consits of:Soils from excavation: is divided into two parts. The first part consists in splitting the wet
soils from the rest of the received waste, in order to evacuate them to the inert waste landfill.
This part represents about 12,000 tons per year (12% of the incoming CD waste). Thus, drysoils correspond to the remaining 88%. This waste is stored in the construction waste storage
area and is used for:- internal use at new landfills- sales / storage
Waste generated during demolition: this waste is treated at the CDW plant. Mentioned waste issorted first on the floor, in order to separate inert waste (70%) from non-inert waste (30%). The
non-inert waste is transported by trucks to the landfill. The inert waste goes through thetreatmant process to be crushed and screened, and then transported to the right size storage
unit. The stored products (fractions) are used for external off-take (sales).
Pre-sorting at the CDW platform occurs with the wheel excavator to remove waste thatshould not be put into the crushers, but gets transported by trucks to the landfill for surplus
construction waste. There is 30% of the incoming waste which is expected to be not suitablefor entering the process and will be evacuated toward the landfill.
Construction waste suitable for treatment at the CDW plant is stored in an additional storage
area, on the gravel area of the CDW platform. Platform for additional storage has thecapacity to accommodate 385 t of waste per day.

95_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 35 Skladištenje građevinskog otpada pre tretman (Source: IDP Book 7/3 Technologicaldesign, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
CDW plant has a capacity of 200,000t/year (300 t/h with an input material density of 2.6
t/m3).
The estimated flow of construction waste through the CDW plant is shown in the figure:

Figure 36 Estimated flow of materials through the CDW plant (Source: IDP Book 7/3
Technological design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)96_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

CDW treatment plant is portable and consists from:- Portable crushing plant (250 kW power)- Portable screening plant (22 kW power)- Set of 4 belt conveyors (37,2 kW power)
Expected production at the plant is:- 67% fraction of 0/32 mm- 33% fraction of 32/80 mm
CDW plant consists of 4 segments:- feed hopper of a vibrating grizzly feeder- impact crusher- magnetic separator- belt conveyors system

Figure 37 Illustration of the portable CDW tratment plant97_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________An example of the technological scheme of the crushing process is given in the following
schemeFigure 38 Process Flow Diagram of CDW treatment at thr CDW plant (Source: IDP Book 7/3
Technological design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)98_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The following is a description of the crushing plant process according to market currents withrespect to the inflow and fractions demand of a particular granulation.
The process concept of a CDW plant can, with the time of exploitation, be adapted to current
market requirements, either in relation to the construction waste inflow or in terms of changing
the demand of a particular fraction in terms of quality and / or quantity. The evolution of theprocess in that context would be realized by modifying the crushing and sifting equipment,
according to new requirements with respect to the granulation of individual fractions and / or
the redistribution of the reserved volumes for receiving and storing sorted material.
The loading of materials is performed by wheel loader from the zone of temporary storage
areas into the feed hopper of a vibrating grizzly feeder, gradually loading construction waste
From the vibrating grizzly feeder, the material goes to the system of vibrating screens which
are designed to separate the input material into several fractions, according to their size. At theoutput of the feed hopper, the waste is calibrated according to the defined sizes. The grizzly
spacing of the bars makes it possible to enable this sorting. The opening is 52 mm, so all waste
finer than 52 mm goes through and the rest is discharged directly into the crusher. The grizzly
spacing is 52mm / 38mm.
Waste from the grizzly feeder below 52mm is again sorted in a vibrating screen with a 32mm
mesh. Waste less than 32mm is transported by a belt conveyor into a storage area.
The vibrating screen separates waste into 3 different sizes (0/32mm; 32/80mm; 80/150mm)
which are sent to a dedicated storage area. Size 80/150mm can be returned back to crusher bymeans of pivoting belt conveyor.
The crusher consists of rotors equipped with knives. The crusher is design to treat up to 100
t/hour, (385 tones/day) of construction waste.
Material larger than 52 mm leaving the feeder is transported by a belt conveyor into thecrusher. The waste is then crushed to a size of about 50 mm.
Waste between 52mm and 32mm is discharged by another belt conveyor to the magnetic
separator to remove ferrous waste.
A magnetic separator is used to extract ferrous metal from a waste stream.
Belt conveyors are used to carry materials to the treatment machines and/or to transportsorted/crushed CDW.

99_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The materials sorted by the machine are evacuated from the CDW by belt conveyors to thedesignated places for storing obtained fractions, with the following capacities:-

250 m3 for the 0-32 mm fraction
150 m3 for the 32-80 mm fraction
150 m3 for the 80 -150 mm fraction

Figure 39 Temporary storage of treated material by obtained fractions (Source: IDP Book 7/3
Technological design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
In addition to these temporary storage sites, a buffer storage space with a capacity of 3,000m3 of sorted material is foreseen, for 20 days of storage, within the CDW plateau.

Figure 40 Storage area for the treated construction waste100_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

If during the landfill management period there were market changes in the pattern of inflow
and demand of fractions of a certain granulation, the concept of the crushing plant would be
adjusted in terms of adequate selection of new and replacement of existing crushing and sifting
equipment. As a consequence, there may be a redistribution of the reserved volumes forreceiving and storing sorted material to meet the needs of the evolved process.
For manipulation of construction demolition waste on CDW platform, excavator and wheel
loader of the following characteristics will be used:
Hydraulic excavator- Type: MH 3026 or similar- Additional equipment:• Multi-functional crusher;• Demolition and sorting grapple;• Hydraulic hammer;
Wheel loader- Type: CAT 966 or similar- Hours of use: 150 h/month (1 shift, 5 days/week)- Bucket capacity: 5 tons
- Maximum speed: 39 km/h

Figure 41 Excavator and wheel loader

101_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Hydrotechnical installations at the CDW platform
The following hydrotechnical installations and facilities are envisaged within the CDW
platform (Source: IDP Book 3/7 Hydrotechnical Installations Design, Energoprojekt
Hidroinženjering, May, 2019):- Outdoor sanitary water supply network- Outdoor industrial water network with the connection for the dust reductions system
during the crushing- Outdoor hydrant firefighting network- Outdoor foul water sewerage network- Technological sewer for water drainage after dedusting with the settling tank.
- Oily water street gutters and oily rain water sewerage network with the settling tankand light fluids separator
The water supply and sewerage system of the CDW platform is connected to the outdoor
water supply and sewerage system of the entire Landfill complex, which is located in theimmediate vicinity of the platform. The total designated water consuption for sanitary needs
is 0,47 l/s.
Industrial (process) water network is connected to the outdoor industrial water distribution
network of the complex, which is supplied from the landfill leachate water treatment plant. It
is estimated that 0.2 l/s of industrial water is needed for the CDW plant, in order to reduce
dust emission.
Foul water sewage network from the facilities on the CDW plateau, whose expected volume
is 0.56 l / s, is connected to the outdoor foul water sewage network of the Vinča complex.
After dedusting, waste waters are collected from the concrete plateau via canals with grates,
which are directly routed to the settler tank. These waters are from the settling tank are
directed to the oil waters separator. These channels collect and drain the rain water from theplateau.
The expected amount of waste water generated by firefighting is 0.2 l / s, but for thedimensioning of the system for the intake of these wastewaters, the amount of atmosphericwater that flows into it has been adopted as relevant. The expected amount of oily rain water
is 63.8 l / s.
Oily surface waters from the plateau are collected and directed to the oily waters separator
with the settling tank. The separator's flow rate is 150 l/s. Upon the treatment, these waters
are drained into to the perimeter rain waters channels.
The fire water network is connected to the outdoor hydrant fire network of the complex,
which is supplied from the fire water tank, with a capacity 75 m3, located in the immediate
vicinity of the complex entrance, and which is filled from the city water supply network. The
total estimated water consumption for the hydrant fire fighting network is 10 l/s.

102_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Electrical supply for the CDW platform
Electrical supply of consumers at the platform is provided from the new transformer station
TS1, 630kVA, 10kV / 0,4kV, which is located in the construction plot K3 ((Source: IDP
Book 4/4 Power Supply Design, Energoprojekt Industrija, May, 2019)).
Laying of 1kV cable lines from the TS1, 10kV / 0,4kV NN plant to the main distribution box
will be carried out underground. From the TS1 to the CDW plant platform, three power
cables are foreseen, one for the technological consumers of the CDW plant, the other for the
CDW crusher, and the third for other consumers at the platform: a business container, asanitary container, a storage container, a platform lighting and power supply for the
camcorder.
Ground and lightning rod installations
The CDW platform lightning installation will consist of an internal and external lightning rod
installation, which are galvanically interconnected and provide effective protection against
atmospheric discharges. The facility’s external lightning rod system installation will consist of:- the receiving system,- down conductors to the grounding facility and- grounding facility.
The protection against atmospheric discharge of the container will be performed by a classic
lightning rod installation in the form of a Faraday cage. The down conductors will be made ofsteel/galvanized Fe/Zn 20 mm x 3 mm strip. They will be placed on the facade of the building,on appropriate supports or in concrete pillars.
The protection against indirect contact of metal parts, which are not energized under normal
operating conditions, but can be in the event of a malfunction, will be achieved byautomatically switching off the power supply. The applied power system in this case is the
TN-S system.
Lighting installating
Within the CDW platform, the following lighting installations are foreseen:- General indoor lighting installation is done with energy efficient lamps with LED lightsource (or fluo lamps).
- Anti-panic lighting is performed with lamps with LED light source, equipped with acbattery and 1 hour operation autonomy. These lamps provide safe movement and evacuation incase of power failure. Anti-panic lighting locations must comply with the requirements oflighting according to SRPS EN 1838. Anti-panic lighting is automatically switched on after a
power outage from the network.
- General outdoor lighting installation of roads and buildings is performed with energy
efficient lamps with natural light source, which are mounted on 10 meters high steel poles.
Electricity consumption
103_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The basic technological equipment on the CDW platform, supplied by “Metso“, has a powerof 334,2 kW. Installed power of other consumers is approx. 37,1 kW. The total installed
power on the plateau is about 371,3 kW. Estimated electricity consumption is about 700
MWh per year.
Telecommunication, signalling and video installations
Telecommunication and signal installations are foreseen in the office container. The pillars
on the platform will be equipped with 4 fixed video surveillance cameras and the fifth on theoffice container. They will be, via network commutator, connected to the video surveillance
server and work station in the doorman booth. (Source: IDP Book 5/3 Telecommunicationand Signalling Installations Design, Energoprojekt Industrija, May, 2019).
In the office, each of two work places will be provided with two connectors RJ45 category
6a, one for IP phone and one for work station.
The voice & data system in the office container shall be connected to the integrated voice &data system of the entire complex. The office container shall be equipped with one network
commutator with 16 gigabit connections and 2 optical fiber 10- gigabit connections toward
the network backbone. With the help of this commutator, all the work stations and IP phones
shall be connected to the main commutator in the doorman booth.
Traffic solution
A traffic solution on the CDW platform consists of an entrance part, entrance/exit road for
traffic from the platform. There are containers for staff accommodation and 3 longitudinal
parking spaces next to it. (Source: IDP Book 2/7 Road design, Energoprojekt Industrija,
May, 2019).
The crushed stone road, which goes through the platform, is formed in the extension of theasphalt road. Full trucks bring the construction waste and unload it at areas dedicated for thistype of material. The unloaded trucks circle around the platform and exit it. The empty trucks
that entered the site for collection of the granulates, stop next to the granulates area, areloaded and exit the complex.
The drainage, according to the grading solution, directs the atmospheric water towards theentrance/exit from the platform, from where it is further taken to the separator.

104_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The pavement structure at the part of the entrance road's paved part consists of the following
courses:- 5 cm asphalt concrete wearing course AB 11- 8 cm top bituminous sub base course BNS 22- 15 cm mechanically stabilized crushed stone course (0-31)- 30 cm mechanically stabilized gravel-sand course (0-63)
Total thickness of the pavement structure is D = 58 cm.
Structure of the crushed-stone road surface (JUS U.S4.050) consists of the following courses:- 15 cm surface of vibrated crushed stone (0-31)- 30cm mechanically stabilized gravel-sand sub base course (0-63)
Total thickness of the pavement structure is D = 45 cm.
Truck traffic is designed to avoid any crossings and not interfere with moving equipment for
manipulating construction waste.
3. New landfill
The construction area of the new landfill belongs to the spatial-functional unit K3 and K5(construction plot KP6-7), according to the current Detailed Regulation Plan (Source: IDP
Book 7/1 Technological Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019).
Construction of the new landfill is planned west to the existing landfill and will be formed
from several cells. The cells will be successively formed and opened, according to plan andneeds. The construction of cells should provide permanent, controlled, organized and safe
disposal of waste.
On the construction site KP6-7, within the New Landfill, it is planned to deposit thefollowing types of waste:- Temporary sanitary landfill for municipal waste,- Sanitary landfill for untreated waste,- Landfill for residues resulting from the waste processing at EfW plant and- Inert waste landfill (north of the existing landfill

105_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

3a. Temporary sanitary landfill for municipal waste, sanitary landfill for untreated waste
and landfill for residues from EfW plant
The area where the waste disposal is planned is prepared by removing the material, in order
to extend the bottom of the landfill. The removed material can be used to build theembankment until an adequate inclination is achieved.
The municipal waste sanitary landfill will contain protection systems whose role is to prevent
expansion of pollution from the landfill body to the natural terrain and to isolate the wastefrom external effects. The most relevant protection systems of the municipal waste landfillare:- lining systems in the base and on the flanks formed from multi-layer barriers which are
typically constructed from compacted clay, geosynthetic clay layers and/or a combination ofthem, geosynthetic geomembranes and drainage layers;- covering finishing systems, which restrict the flow of atmospheric water to the landfill
body and prevent the infiltration of atmospheric water into the landfill body after its closure;
A system for the collection and evacuation of leachate water and a system for the collection oflandfill gas, which are formed inside the landfill body, is planned at the municipal waste
landfill.
The Landfill Design proposes that new quantities of waste are disposed starting from thelowest places of the new interim landfill in cells, of average dimensions 74,0 x 57,0 m. Theinterim landfill of municipal waste is separated from the landfills for untreated waste andresidues from EfW plant. Waste at the landfill is disposed on a previously prepared surface.
Waste disposal
Disposal of waste on the landfill is done on the surface, on a prepared base and with installed
wells (biogas and leachate water, 1 well per cell).
A garbage truck arrives along the designed transport route to a designated work area on thelandfill body and unloads the waste.
Waste leveling and compaction
Upon delivery to the landfill, waste is systematically disposed and leveled in layers of 0,5 m
thickness and compacted to a specified density by a compactor. Onto every compacted layer
the next thin layer of waste is spread, which is also compacted by a compactor. This
operation is repeated throughout the waste disposal period, until the total height of the daily
waste layer (about 2 m) is reached and then covered with a layer of inert material.This forms
one working cell, i.e. a working level of total length of 2,30 m onto which the daily amountof waste is disposed. The degree of compaction is an extremely important parameter that
determines the lifespan of a landfill and therefore it is necessary to use a compactor resulting in a high density of disposed waste (more than 0.9 t / m3), which also saves spaceand reduces the risk of fire.
106_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The best compact density is achieved for layers whose thickness does not exceed 0.60 m, so
the most efficient compactness is over a large number of thin layers. Optimal density isachieved with 3 - 5 crossings of the compactor.
Leveling and compaction are better if the waste is moist, but thus the decomposition of organic
matter is accelerated, leading to increased gas separation.
The entire daily amount of waste that is disposed and compacted at the end of the day must becovered with inert material to reduce the spread of waste and the risk of fire, as well as the
spread of unpleasant odors. The thickness of the inert blanket will be about 10 cm, thus
creating a working cell.
At the landfill in question and with this method of sanitary waste disposal, the maximum
height of the landfill will be about 77 m, plus a final layer for covering / recultivation of
thickness from 1.20 to 1.30 m.
As an inert material for covering freshly deposited waste, the following materials can serve:- earth material from excavation originating from the site of the landfill itself and/or thewhole complex, but also from other sites in the city area,- prepared construction debris, i.e. construction waste that can no longer be used,- near-surface sediments represented by loess, lesoid clay and silty sand, from local anddistant borrow sites.
An inert material cover prevents insects, reduces penetration of water into the depositedwaste layers, prevents adverse effects (smells and visual effects), prevents dispersal ofindividual components in the waste (paper, nylon bags, plastic...), contact of birds, rodents,
insects, etc. with the waste, thus preventing spreading of infectious diseases.
The finishing cover layer at the landfill (the recultivation layer) is envisaged from material
from the new landfill excavation, 120 cm thick and top-soil material 10 cm thick, which
provides the total thickness of the finishing cover of 1.3 m.
The total capacity of the free space for disposal of the new landfill will be approximately
6.525.000 m3, on about 29 ha of surface. The realization of the landfill is foreseen to take placein phases, with the next phase of deposition starting after full capacity has been deposited forthe previous phase. The construction of a new landfill at the Vinča site is planned in threephases, with respect to the waste material disposal, the planning of the phases itself will beenviable in relation to the future operational circumstances at that moment.
The landfill for temporary disposal of municipal waste will be in operation for about 1.5 years.

107_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

After that period, phase II starts for a period of 3 years, when the operation of the EfW plant
begins. By the end of phase II, waste that does not go to the EfW plant will be disposed in thearea envisaged for the Untreated Waste Landfill ("Untreated Waste I"). With the operation of
the EfW plant, residues (ash and bottom ash) are generated after stabilization in the plant
itself (the subject of the EfW plant construction project). These remains will be deposited
during the phase II period in the area envisaged for the Landfill of residues resulting fromwaste treatment at the EfW plant ("Residues I").
After the phase II, phase III of the new landfill construction will be realized, which will last
22 years. During this period, the disposal of waste that does not go to the EfW plant("Untreated Waste II") and residues from the EfW plant ("Residues II") will be carried out.

Figure 42 Plan for the formation of the new landfill by phases (Source: IDP Book 7/1
Technological Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)108_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Estimated quantity of the excavated earth material (to be confirmed in the Main Design)- for the phase I: quantity of excavation: 280.000 m3, quantity of waste filling 980.000 m3- for the phase II: quantity of excavation: 111.500 m3, quantity of waste filling 900.000m3
The temporary disposal of excavation material is foreseen in the area reserved for Phase III of
the project from 2021. to 2046. The excavation / loading balance indicates that all excavationmaterial will be used for filling during the construction of the new landfill.

Figure 43 Temporary disposal of humus and excavation material
The total amount of land for waste filling in the first and second phase is 1.203.000 m3.

109_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Depositing capacity
The new landfill is designed in accordance with the following waste disposal programme:
For Phase I, in duration of 1.5 years, the following amount of waste is foreseen:
Waste disposal on the interim municipal waste
landfill (lasting 1,5 years)
Year

Amount of waste (t)1.0

510,000

0.5

255,000

From the given table, the total amount of waste is derived:
m uk = m1 + m2 = 510.000 t + 255.000 t = 765.000 t,
after compaction of waste by compactor, waste density is ρ=1,06 t/m3, which makes the totalrequired net volume:m765.000t
Vuk = uk == 722.000m 3
3
ρ
1,06 t / m
For Phase II, in duration of 3 years, the following amount of waste is foreseen:
Waste disposal at the new landfill (cells for“Untreated waste I”)
YearAmount of waste (t)1

170,000

2

170,0003

170.000110_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

From the given table, the total amount of waste is derived:
m uk = m1 + m2 + m3 = 170.000 t + 170.000 t + 170.000 t = 510.000 t
after compaction of waste by compactor, waste density is ρ=1,06 t/m3, which makes the totalrequired net volume:m
510.000t= 481.100m 3
Vuk = uk =ρ
1,06 t / m 3
Estimated amounts of residues from the EfW plant, for Phase II in duration of 3 years, arepresented in the table:
Waste disposal on the new landfill (cells for“Residues I”)
Year

Amount of waste (t)1.

88.2002.

88.2003.

88.200From the given table, the total amount of waste is derived:
m uk = m1 + m2 + m3 = 88.200 t + 88.200 t + 88.200 t = 264.600 t
for average residues density of ρ=1,5 t/m3, which makes the total required net volume:m
264.600t
Vuk = uk == 176.400m 3
3
ρ
1,5 t / m
For Phase III, in duration of 22 years, the following amount of waste is foreseen:
Waste disposal on the new landfill (cells for“Untreated waste II”)
Year

Amount of waste (t)from 1. to 22.

170.000 per year

From the given table, the total amount of waste is derived:
m uk =m1 + m2 +…+ m22 = 170.000 t +170.000 t+…+170.000 t = 3.740.000 t
after compaction of waste by compactor, waste density is ρ=1,06 t/m3, which makes the totalrequired net volume:m
3.740.000t
Vuk = uk == 3.528.300m 3
3
ρ
1,06 t / m

111_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Estimated amounts of residues from the EfW plant, for Phase II in duration of 22 years, arepresented in the table:
Waste disposal on the new landfill (cells for“Residues II”)
Year

Amount of waste (t)from 1. to 22.

88.200 per year

From the given table, the total amount of waste is derived:
m uk =m1 + m2 +…+ m22 =88.200 t +88.200 t +…+88.200 t = 1.940.400 t
for average residues density of ρ=1,5 t/m3, which makes the total required net volume:m
1.940.400t
Vuk = uk == 1.293.600m 3
3
ρ
1,5 t / mMorphological composition of municipal waste
Average composition of municipal waste and percentage of certain fractions were analysed in
the Environmental and Social Scoping Study for the Belgrade WtE project in Serbia for the
2012-2014 period. This analysis provided results shown in the table.
Table 10 Composition of waste on solid municipal waste landfill (Source: IDP Book 7/1
Technological Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
Component
Percentage of raw waste, %Food waste
25,6%
Paper
11,1%
Cardboard
13,8%
Plastic
13,8%
Textile3,8%
Diapers
3,9%
Leather
1,0%
Garden green waste
6,6%
Tree
1,6%
Glass
5,2%
Metals2,3%Inert waste
10,9%
Hazardous waste
0,4%
TOTAL
100,0%

112_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Within the composition of domestic waste, the usual value is about 0.4% of hazardous waste.
A method of managing hazardous waste, originating from the household, is its primary
selection and extraction, before the collection and disposal of municipal waste.
For the purpose of temporary storage of hazardous waste, a quarantine area is foreseen. The
quarantine area is an area with a fence and isolated infrastructure. If hazardous waste is
detected in the incoming waste, it will be stored in the quarantine area until it is handed over tothe operators to treat a specific type of hazardous waste.

Figure 44 Quarantine area
Landfill gas
Landfill gas is produced at municipal landfills due to degradation of degradable waste.
Landfill gas is a mixture of gases formed by anaerobic decomposition of organic components
of disposed waste. The gas composition depends primarily on the type and amount of waste,
as well as the microbiological processes that take place in the body of the landfill. The basic
gases that are generated by degradation are: methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2).
Methane and carbon dioxide are represented in the landfill gas in a large percentage, andother gases occupy a smaller share in the total volume.

113_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Methane (CH4) gas is colorless and odorless and is a flammable gas. At concentrations in therange of 5 -15% by volume and in contact with oxygen, methane is self-igniting, and thesetwo values represent the lower and upper limits of methane flammability. This is a gas thathas a lower density than air.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is also a colorless and odorless gas. Unlike methane, it does notbelong to explosive gases. Its density is 1.5 times greater than air density.
Under normal conditions, the landfill gas, by molecular diffusion, goes into the atmosphere.
In the case of an active landfill, due to the pressure difference, there is also a convective
transfer. Methane, in addition to being largely discharged into the atmosphere, also shows theability to migrate horizontally. Because it is heavier than air, carbon dioxide remains in highconcentrations in the lower layers of the landfill so it can remain there for many years after
the landfill closes.
The formation of landfill gas
The formation of landfill gases can be divided into five more or less consecutive phases. The
speed of each individual process varies, and therefore the duration of each phase. The
duration of the phases depends on the conditions which are established in the landfill bodyand enable the previous phase to fully unfold.

Figure 45 Phases of landfill gas formation(Source: IDP Book 7/1 Technological Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May 2019)114_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Phase I is aerobic, initial stage of organic waste decomposition. The process of microbial
degradation in the presence of oxygen from the air begins in this stage.
In the aerobic phase, a chemical hydrolysis reaction takes place to produce simple sugar glucose (C 6 H 12 O 6 ) from cellulose (C 6 H 10 O 5 ):C 6 H 10 O 5 + H 2 O

C 6 H 12 O 6Upon completion of the first phase, the oxygen content in the landfill decreases significantly.
Then begins Phase II, which is a transition phase from aerobic to anaerobic conditions. Upontransition to anaerobic conditions, the present nitrates and sulfates are reduced and alreadystart to form nitrogen gas and hydrogen sulfide.
Phase III may be presented as an acidic stage of the process, as microbiological activity, thatstarted in phase II, intensifies, resulting in higher amounts of organic acids and lower
amounts of hydrogen. Acidogenic microorganisms are responsible for the formation of acids.
This phase includes the processes of enzymatic transformations and microbial conversion.
The basic gas that is produced is carbon dioxide. In the process of acidogenesis, with the effectof micro-organisms, from glucose (C 6 H 12 O 6 ) are obtained: methane (HCOOH), ethane(CH 3 COOH), propane (CH 3 CH 2 COOH) acid and separates carbon dioxide (CO 2 ).
C 6 H 12 O 6

2CH 3 CH 2 OH + 2CO 2C 6 H 12 O 6 + 2H 2

2CH 3 CH 2 COOH + 2H 2 O

C 6 H 12 O 6

3CH 3 COOH

Methane fermentation stage represents the IV phase of the process. At this stage,
methanogenic microorganisms that are anaerobic play a dominant role. The formation of
methane and organic acids takes place at the same time, as the rate of acid formation
decreases. The resulting acids and hydrogen are converted to methane (CH 4 ) and carbon
dioxide (CO 2 ).
CO 2 + 4H 2

CH 4 + 2H 2 O

2C 2 H 5 OH + CO 2

CH 4 + 2CH 3 COOH

CH 3 COOH

CH 4 + CO 2

The last is phase V, and it can be expressed as the phase of maturation. In the phase V,
biodegradable organic matters are converted into methane and carbon dioxide, and moisturethat migrates through the waste helps converting the residual biodegradable material. The
rate of gas formation now drops significantly, due to lack nutrients that left the landfill bodywith leachate, or the lack of biodegradable waste. At this stage, methane gas and carbon
dioxide are produced.

115_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The duration of each phase depends on several factors: conditions at the landfill, moisture
content of the waste, availability of nutrients, characteristics and compactness of the waste.
The structure of waste determines its characteristics.
Waste with a higher proportion of readily biodegradable components, will be able to generatehigher concentrations of landfill gas, because certain types of organic waste contain large
amounts of nutrients for bacteria involved in the process. In this way the higher activity ofthe mentioned bacteria is achieved, which results in a faster production of landfill gas.
The compactness of disposed waste is important, because less compacted waste leaves more
space for oxygen to penetrate the landfill body, so aerobic digestion takes longer. However,if the waste is compact, it will be more difficult for air to enter the landfill body, therefore themethane generation phase will start earlier.
Atmospheric pressure affects the penetration of oxygen into the landfill body, primarily into
the shallower layers, resulting in aerobic degradation in these layers.
Water and moisture content affect the movement of nutrients to bacteria and their growth
condition. In the more compact landfills, moisture migration is lower
Temperature is a factor that affects the multiplication of bacteria. This influence is strongest
in landfills with less depth. As the temperature rises, bacterial activity increases and so doesgas production. A decrease in temperature adversely affects the formation of landfill gas.
Temperatures below 10oC significantly reduce the activity of bacteria.
Landfill gas production at the landfill for untreated waste
Before designing the sanitary landfill, mathematical modeling of landfill gas production was
performed. The model is developed on the basis of input data, relating primarily to thesurface and volume of the landfill and the waste composition.
A preliminary mathematical model of production and biogas collection opportunities has
been developed for the new Vinča landfill. The performed SIMTEC simulation is based on a
combination of two theoretical models: SWANA (Solid Waste Association of North
America) and the American Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It is estimated that
there will be around 170,000 tonnes of waste deposited annually at the new landfill, startingin 2021. The results obtained by simulation are shown in the following diagram.

116_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Diagram 1 Biogas production model(Source: IDP Book 7/1 Technological Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
At the very beginning of 2022, a sudden jump in landfill gas production occurs with amaximum peak of 2,390 m3/h. After that, there is a sharp decline in production to stabilize
production around 2025, with steady growth until 2050, when it will amount to 2,070 m3/h.
After this period, a logarithmic decline is expected by 2056, when production is expected to be
300 m3/h, and in 2090 production is reduced to a minimum of zero.
The flow of collected landfill gas is less than the theoretical production. It is predicted that inthe 2020-2053. period, the flow of collected landfill gas ranges from 300-1400 m3/h, with anaverage value of about 1,000 m3/h.
Based on the above, it is possible to calculate the average gas collection rate (AGCR) by form:
AGCR = (W x 0,35 + X x 0,65 + Y x 0,85 + Z x 0,9)/(V + W + X + Y + Z), in accordance withthe table:
Table 11 Dependence of gas collection rate on surface characteristics(Source: IDP Book 7/1 Technological Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
Type of surface
Operating zone is disconnected
Operating zone connected to a biogas
combustion unit

Collection rate,(%)

Area, (m2)

0

V

35

W

117
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Semi-waterproof (transition layer with alow permeability) zone connected to abiogas combustion unit

65

X

Waterproof (1 m thickness layer ofcovering material with permeability <109m/s) zone connected to a biogas
combustion unit

85

Y

Liner covered zone connected to a biogas
combustion unit

90

Z

The typical composition of landfill gas is given in the table:
Unit

Typical values(interval)

CH 4

%

35 - 50N2%

33 - 23CO 2%

27 - 29

O2%

Components

0-3
3

VOC

mg/m N

800 - 900

VOSiC

mg/m3N

5 - 20%100

Relative humidity
H2S
Lower heat power
Density

mg/m3N

900 - 1200

3

3.49 - 4.99

kg/m N

1.28 - 1.18

kWh/m N
3

Degassing of the untreated waste landfill
In terms of degassing, active and passive systems are distinguished. Passive and active systems
are based on the installation of degassing wells - biotrns. Biotrn is a degasser that is formed bydrilling a hole in the landfill body into which a perforated tube is placed at 50-90% of thewaste depth, most preferably being set at about 75% of the waste depth.
An active degassing system performs forced landfill gas drainage. The landfill gas is extracted
under vacuum conditions from the landfill body through biotrns, by means of a compressor
station, and taken by a pipeline network system to a system for the transformation of biogas
into energy (BEP plant, which is not the subject of this study).

118_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The proposed number of biotrns per hectare of the new landfill body is in the upper limit (moresecure system) of the value range prescribed by ADEME (the French Agency for theEnvironment and Energy Management Environmental Agency).
An active degassing system is planned in parts of the landfill for the treatment of untreatedmunicipal waste.
Biotrns are perforated HDPE (high-density polyethylene) tubes that are placed in a boreholewith a diameter of Ø600. They consist of body and head.
The body of the biotrain consists of a perforated PE pipe Ø110, the last 3 m are without
perforation, while in the case of drainage biotrn, pipe is Ø315. The length of the biotrns is up toa maximum of 17 m, which is the maximum length of biotrns in the middle of the landfill,while the maximum length of biotrns placed on slopes is 13 m. The pipes that make the biotrns
are SDR 17 and 315 mm and 110 mm in diameter, depending on their purpose. The impact
zone of a well is 15 meters radius.

Figure 46 Schematic display of a Biotrn (Source: IDP Book 7/1 Technological Design,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
Each cell of the landfill for untreated waste will be equipped with one well from the bottom of
the landfill, which, in addition to collecting biogas, will also be used for drainage andcollection of leachate water. In the case of drainage biotrns with leachate water pipes,
submersible pumps are planned to pump the leachate water from the biotrn.

119_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

There are two ways of appointing these types of wells
The first is based on the placement of concrete rings, which are perforated. Such wells aremost effective if placed in the drainage layer at the bottom of a cell. The first concrete ring isplaced at the level of the drainage layer. When the waste reaches the height of the first ring,
the next concrete ring is placed on and thus every next one. The space between the concretering and the biotrn’s inner tube is filled with a drainage layer of gravel.
Another way of installing wells going from the bottom of the landfill is by using a metal
cylindrical mold, 800 mm in diameter and about 4 m long, which is positioned on the drainage
layer of the bottom of the cell.
The head of the biotrn is partly installed underground and partly above ground and forms the
final part of the biotrn. The biotrn’s head is made of solid pipe (without perforations). The
biotrn’s head consists of:- 3 m long pipe, 160 mm diameter.
- Anchor plate is placed around the well’s head as a support for the biotrn.
- A tertiary network is connected to the biotrn’s head via T pieces.
- Top of the biotrn’s head is equipped with a sealing connection for gas sampling.
An active degasser system will be installed over the surfaces for the disposal of untreatedwaste. The biogas network from the landfill body to the BEP plant consists of:- Pipe biogas network;- Elements for condensate collection and draining.

The wells will not be installed on the parts of the landfill used for the disposal of stabilized
incineration residues, because the waste that is disposed here is not biodegradable and will noteven generate landfill gas.
Biogas network (landfill gas collection and extraction network), active degassing system,(Source: IDP Book 2/5 Construction design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, January
2019.),consists of: a primary, secondary and tertiary network that connects biotrns with thesystem for the transformation of biogas into energy (BEP plant). For the production of biogas
network, HDPE pipes are used with a diameter: primary network D = 315 mm, secondary
network D = 160 - 250 mm and tertiary network D = 110 mm.
The primary network is laid above the ground. Tertiary and secondary networks can be laid
above ground over the landfill and then rested over adjustable metal supports orunderground, by laying the pipes in the ground. Biogas Network Configuration:- The radius of influence of each biotrn is 15 m,- 9 to 15 biotrns are connected to the secondary collector Ø 160 mm,- 1 manual valve between the secondary and the main collector,- 1 barometric drainage at the end/beginning of each secondary collector to avoid
collecting too much condensate in the main collectors,- Minimum one waterproof drainage on each main collector.

120_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The collected condensate from the biogas network is pumped and piped to the system for theevacuation of leachate water from the landfill and further to the lagoon for leachate waters, ie
treatment at the LTP plant. The quantity of produced condensate created in the collection
system depends on how much gas is extracted, as well as the pressure or biogas vacuum andthe temperature change value. The amount of condensate varies throughout the year. During
the winter, the most condensate is generated.

Figure 47 Biotrns with biogas network (active system)(Source: IDP Book 2/5 Construction design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)121_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

3b. Inert material landfill
Inert material landfill is planned to be located in the north part of the complex, on plot KP6-7
above the old landfill body.
It is planned to prepare the bottom of the natural terrain on an area of approximately 95.825
m2 with removal of the surface layer of soil with an average depth of about 2.5 m, whereby
all excavated material would be used for overlay on the new and old landfill (closing andrecultivaiton).
At the planned area for the landfill of inert material, it is planned to dispose material that is
not hazardous and which would be brought from external construction sites and has thecharacteristics of non-hazardous/inert material and can serve for daily coverings on the newlandfill and a final cover at the old landfill.

Figure 48 Inert material landfill(Source: IDP Book 7/1 Technological Design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)122_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Layers for lining the bottom and slopes of new landfills
The following layers for lining the landfill bottom (viewed from the top to bottom) areenvisaged:- Waste,- 50 cm thick layer of gravel for drainage,- Geotexstile: 1000 g/m2 .
Active barrier:High Density Polyethylene Lining - 2 mm thick HDPE;
Passive barrier:
The geosynthetic clay liner GCL low permeability and compacted clay layer of 50cm of clay
material, the water permeability coefficient of this layer is total k x ≤ 1 x 10-9 m/s. (Thissolution is equivalent to a 100cm thick layer of clay lining with a water permeability
coefficient k x ≤ 1 x 10-9 m/s. This solution will only be applied if the natural soil does not meetthe required water permeability coefficients (100cm with a water permeability coefficient k x ≤1 x 10-9 m/s). During the construction works, we will conduct testing to determine thewatertightness of the natural soil at the bottom of the landfill.
Natural soil:
A compact layer of clay lining covers the entire base of the bottom of the landfill, and is
performed up to 2 m on slopes, as shown in the drawing below.
The geosynthetic layer (geosynthetic clay layer + geomembrane + geotextile) covers the entire
base and slopes of the bottom of the landfill. They are anchored on a slope curve to prevent thegeomembrane from sliding down the slopes, and to prevent the lifting of the geomembrane
under the influence of wind, which is not anchored.
The drainage layer covers only the flat part of the base of the landfill bottom.

123_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 49 Landfill bottom and slopes lining (Source: IDP Book 7/1 Technological Design,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)124_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________New landfill recultivation (closing) layer
The final covering layer for the deposited waste is made of material that was generated
during excavation for the formation of a new landfill.
According to design requirements, i.e. design solution, the maximum slope inclination of thelandfill cover is 33% (1V/3H). Apart from this, considering primary and secondary
compaction of waste in new landfills, it can be considered that the slope inclination oflandfill cover will decrease below the value of 33.3%. The total thickness of cover layers is
1.30 m.
Designing the layer for final covering of the landfill (i.e. landfill cover) is performed in thefollowing way, starting from the top of the landfill to its bottom:- Cover layer – soil 50 cm (10 cm humus + 40 cm excavation material);- Layer for atmospheric water drainage – geocomposite drainage layer;- Layer of low permeability soil, 50 cm thickness – excavation material;- Layer for gas drainage, 20-30 cm layer thickness, which is also a protective layer;- Waste.

Figure 50 Covering layers at the landfill (Source: IDP Book 7/1 Technological Design,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)125_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Drainage system and leachate water discharge
Leachate from the New landfill (Source: IDP Book 3/3 Hydrotechnical installations design,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, January, 2019) is all the water that passes through thelandfill body, i.e. through the disposed waste and infiltrates towards the most downstream
part of the landfill. Having in mind such degree of leachate pollution, their collection,discharge and treatment is foreseen.
According to the relevant literature and the empirical data, the balance of water that falls on
the landfill amounts to:
For the landfills located on the “inclined“ terrain- evaporates due to thermal heating within the landfill body70%
- chemically bonds during the waste disintegration process
15-25%- infiltrates towards the bottom in the form of a filtrate
5-15%
For the landfills located on the “horizontal” - flat terrain- evaporates due to thermal heating within the landfill body70%
- chemically bonds during the waste disintegration process
20-29%- infiltrates towards the bottom in the form of a filtrate
1-10%

Concept of the leachate drainage system was developed based on the topography of theterrain and the required transport of these waters to the lagoons located on the Upper
platform.
Active surface for the waste disposal is divided in three parts: a part for temporary disposal ofmunicipal waste, a part for disposal of untreated waste and a part for disposal of the EfW plant
residues. According to the type of waste that is disposed, the leachate water system is divided
into two parts:- System for collection of leachate from the interim municipal waste landfill and from thelandfill for the disposal of untreated waste;- System for collection of leachate from the part of the landfill where the stabilized
residues are deposited after waste treatment at an EfW plant.
Leachate collected from both these parts is drained into the leachate lagoons, located at theelevation of 160,00 m.a.s.l. (Upper platform) and further gravitationally to the lagoons on theLower platform at the elevation of 90,00 m.a.s.l, and from there to the leachate treatment
plant (LTP).
Leachate water is intended to be collected from each cell by a drainage pipes system ofappropriate diameter. Drainage pipes from individual cell are collected through secondary
drainage pipes of smaller diameter, which are then connected to a system of primary drainage
pipes of larger diameter.
The primary drainage pipes direct the collected leachate water to the northeastern perimeterembankment, where the lowest points are formed by the slope of the landfill bottom. After
passing through the embankment, the leachate waters are cascaded into the control shafts,
which are installed along the main collector pipes tracks, which bring leachate water into thelagoons for the leachate water on the Upper Platform.
126_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The main collector pipes differ in the origin of leachate water to:• The leachate water collector pipe from the temporary municipal waste landfill and theuntreated waste landfill, which leads the mentioned leachate water to the appropriatelagoon and• The leachate water collector pipe from the part of the landfill where the stabilized
residues are deposited after waste treatment at the EfW plant, which leads thementioned leachate water to the appropriate lagoon.
Waters from cells that have been prepared for waste disposal, but the waste disposal on themhas not started, are considered to be rainwater and as such are evacuated from the landfill bodyby a drainage pipeline system, whereby the valve system, instead into the main collector pipes
for the collection and evacuation of leachate water into the lagoons on the Upper Platform,
directs them to the perimeter channels for rainwater collection and further to the rainwatercollection lagoon on the Upper Platform.
Calculation of leachate quantities
The maximum daily quantity of the leachate from the landfill body was determinedaccording to the formula obtained experimentally by the Russian researchers, which reads:
Qf = k x (P + Q)/365, where:
Q f - Leachate water daily quantity (m3/day)k - Coefficient which characterises ability of moisture and evaporation absorption;
k = 0,15, for the landfills located on the inclined terrain;
P - Total annual precipitation quantity (m3/year);Q - Total annual quantity of other water that is distributed over the landfill (m3/year)

Based on the given formula, Q f = 0,99 l/s ≈ 1.0 l/s is given.
The cells that have been prepared for waste disposal, but where the disposal has not yet begun,are actually collecting and draining atmospheric water. In that sense, the drainage pipes are
dimensioned to the relevant atmospheric water, which is Q = 20.14 l / s.
For defining the dimensions of lagoons (on the Upper platform) that accept only the leachateof the New Landfill, for a maximum quantity of 1,0 l/s, respecting the PE "Srbijavode"condition, it is necessary to provide retention for 20 consecutive calendar days for thecontinuous rain duration t = 24 hours return period T = 25 years, the total lagoon volume of
V = 1.728 m3 is obtained. Two basins of 2 x 2.000 m3 capacity are being adopted. One isforeseen for leachate water from a temporary landfill and a landfill for untreated waste, andthe other for residues after waste treatment at an EfW plant.

127_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Stormwater Drainage System
For the discharge of stormwater from the landfill body after construction (Source: IDP Book
3/3 Hydrotechnical installations design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019), main
peripheral channels which will run around the newly-designed landfill and secondary
concrete channels are foreseen.
The main peripheral channels are also used for the drainage of the stormwater that mightflow in from the external drainage areas into the active phase of the landfill, during the
excavation phase and the landfill operation phase.
The main peripheral channels start from the highest elevation and run to the left and rightside. They lead the stormwater into the lagoon intended for collection of stormwater locatedon the Upper Platform, at the elevation of 160 mm. The main peripheral channels are earth
channels, wit a trapezoidal cross section, with side slopes of 1:1.
The secondary concrete channels collect stormwater from the covered landfill surface and leadthem to the main peripheral channels.
For the reception of rain water with an estimated inflow of 177.67 l/s, a stormwater lagoon (onthe Upper Platform) of the adopted volume of 4,000 m3 is foreseen.
When carrying out excavations for each planned construction, temporary peripheral canals areforeseen around the excavation to prevent the flow of external water into the active area of the
excavation.
3c. Torch System
The location of the planned torch system as part of the system for utilization of landfill gas at
the BEP plant (not the subject of this study) is located on the cadastral plot KP6-7 (Source:
IDR Book 6/3 Torch system, Delta Inženjering, 2019.).
The torch system with the planned access road is positioned on the border of the New
Landfill design and EfW plant (southwest part of the complex).
The torch system is fully connected to the Landfill gas utilization plant (BEP).

128_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 51 Position of the torch system (Source: IDR Book 6/3 Torch system, Delta Inženjering,2019.)The planned torch system will occupy an area of 660 m2. The plateau on which it will beaccommodated is a 30 m long, 22 m wide rectangular shape. The operational part of the plotis covered with oval gravel and covers an area of 420 m2, surrounded by a fence and has a 4meter wide vehicle entrance.
The asphalt road that passes through the vehicle entrance to the plateau for the Torch System
is in the form of the letter "T" and is connected to the road that surrounds the southwest sideof the New Landfill.
On the plateau of the Torch System there are three concrete plateaus on which the equipment
is located: plateau of control equipment (8,0 m2) and two plateaus for the accommodation ofequipment for two torches (rectangular shape length 7,8 m, width 3,4 m, surface 26,5 m2 foreach torch).

129_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 52 Disposition of the contents on the plateau of the torch system (Source: IDR Book 6/3
Torch system, Delta Inženjering, 2019.)
The torch system consists of the following segments:-

Inlet platform of landfill gas;"U" tube for the inlet of the landfill gas;
The system of second torch;
The system of the first torch;
The pipeline for the supply of landfill gas to the torches;
The pipeline for the transport of landfill gas to the BEP plant;
Internal "T" shape road;
Condensate tube;
Fence.

Two plateaus with torches and associated equipment were positioned symmetrically with aninternal asphalt road within the gravel covered area.
The main pipes for conducting the landfill gas from the "old" and the New landfill enter the
middle of the plateau of the Torch System, opposite of the gate and the entrance of theinternal road.

130_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The pipelines from both landfills are connected to the inlet platform and collector the landfill
gas is fed by a single pipe from the to the inlet "U" pipe. From the "U" pipe, the landfill gas
is either conducted towards a cogeneration plant (BEP) or to the Torch System.
Condensation occurs because the landfill gas is saturated with moisture,. The condensate
from the inlet collector of the landfill gas and from the torches is returned to the U-tube bycondensate tubes, and from there it is transported by a pump to the pipeline for collecting
wastewater that is outside the location of the Torch System and further into the lagoon for theleachate water.
The torch system starts when:- if the gas flow is greater than the specified value, or the pressure value is greater than
the set value,- if the gas engines on the cogeneration plant (BEP) are out of operation, where the
BEP control system includes the operation of torches.
When one or both torches start, the torch control system further regulates the landfill gas
flow to maintain the set value of the gas subpressure.
Torch burners are designed so that they can work with different gas flows and different flame
temperatures. The combustion air flow is regulated by means of valves located at the bottomof the combustion chamber. The combustion chamber is equipped with a UV probe andcorresponding relays that are connected to the control cabinet. The temperature measuring
sensors and the emission measurement connection points are located at the top of the torch.
The coils are designed to provide:- gas retention time of more than 3 s,
- a flame temperature exceeding 900 oC

Figure 53 Schematic display of the equipment on the torch frame (Source: IDR Book 6/3 Torchsystem, Delta Inženjering, 2019.)

131_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The first torch has a capacity of 550-2300 Nm3/h, while the second torch has a capacity of
300-1200 Nm3/h. The total expected gas flow together for the "old" and the New landfill isabout 2560 Nm3/h with 50% CH 4 .
Table 1 Characteristics of the torches for landfill gas
Type

Gas flow,
Maximum heat power,
Combustion
Retention time,
Nm3/h, 50% CH 4
kWtemperature, oC
s

BG 2000

550-2300

16000

1000

>3

BG 1000

300-1200

6000

1000

>3

The frames of the torches are of the following dimensions: for the first torch 7,0 x 2,3 m, forthe second torch 5,1 x 1,7 m, and the heights are: for the first torch 8,6 m, and for the second
torch 7,0 m . The diameter of the torches (d s /d u ) is: for the first torch 2,20/1,74 m, and for thesecond torch 1,756/1,4 m.
The torch system is envisaged for occasional operation, in case of short unexpected stops or
during the maintenance of gas engines on the BEP plant, that is, no continuous/long-term
operation of this system is planned.
4. Operative Platform (technical maintenance)
The landfill operative platform is located in the south-east part of the landfill, on a building
plot KP6-7. The platform occupies an area of about 5,000 m2 (Source: IDP Sveska 1/2
Architectural design, Energoprojekt Industrija, May 2019.).
The platform consists of:-

Administration building
Workshop with a vehicel washing area
Hazardous matter storage
Diesel fuel pump station
Containers for hazardous waste (4 pieces)
Machinery parking (with 3 parking places)
Delivery veichels parking (with 5 parking places)
Truck parking (with 8 parking places)
Car parking (with 20 parking places and 1 parking place for disabled person132_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 54 Situation plan - Operative platform (Source: IDP Book 1/2 Architectural design,

Energoprojekt Industrija, May, 2019)
Administration Building
Administrative one-storey building contains a canteen and locker room for employees, isbuilt with brick blocks with a thickness of 25 cm, while the construction is combined frombrick walls (t=25 cm), reinforced concrete slabs, beams and columns and steel elements. The
building basis is the shape of the letter ''L'' axis dimensions 10x3.00 = 30.00m with 2x4.00 +1.50 = 9.50m + 3x3.00 = 9.00m by 4.00 m The roof is two-sloped over reinforced concreteslab t=12cm and the roof structure is steel box beam.
The roof cover is steel panels. The floor slab is reinforced concrete slab with a thickness of
d=15cm, waterproofed, over rammed concrete and rammed gravel slab-on-grades. Floor
finishing is non-slip ceramic tiles in all premises with the exception of the administration
part, where laminate floor is specified in offices and conference rooms.
The interior wall will be finished with plastering, finish painted with semi-dispersion paint,
the toilets and a part of the rest room shall have ceramic wall tiles.

133_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The structure is built on reinforced concrete strip foundation with cross section of reverse''T'', width 80 cm height 115 cm. A rammed concrete layer is placed below the foundation.
The administration building consists of the following premises:- Office- Locker rooms- Sanitary facilities with showers- Canteen for 20 persons- Conference rooms, 12 m2+30 m2- Communication hall.
The heating system of the administration building will be carried out with wall-mounted
electric convectors. The electric convectors shall be controlled by the integrated thermostat.
The air-conditioning of the offices, conference rooms and the rest room will be carried out withwall-mounted split-system air-conditioners. The external units shall be placed on the building’s
facade. The split system control is integrated in the units themselves.

134_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 55 Administration building (Source: IDP Book 1/2 Architectural design, Energoprojekt
Industrija, May, 2019)
Workshop with a Vehicle Washing Area
The workshop dimensions are 12 x 12 m and a height = 8 m, of steel structure on a reinforced
concrete slab. The walls are of prefabricated plasticized steel trapezoidal panels with athickness = 10 cm.
Two segment doors doors 4.5 x 4.5 m, with a pedestrian door each, 90 x 220 cm, openingaround vertical axle. The windows are of steel locksmith and they are being open using
opening mechanism.
Floor finish coating is epoxy coating. The roof covering is of prefabricated plasticized steel
trapezoidal panel with a thickness of 12 cm. Toilet is in the corner, height 2.8 m.
The building shall be erected on the perimeter strip foundation of the width 1.0 m at thedepth of 1.20 m against the building floor, with rammed concrete layer below the foundation.
The floor slab is reinforced concrete and waterproofed, cast over rammed concrete andrammed gravel slab-on-grades.

135_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________A mobile 4 kW compressor, complete with tank, dryer, filters and a connection hose isplanned to be placed in the workshop.
A truck exhaust gases extraction system which is comprised of flexible hose on a reel withadapter for connection to exhaust pipe, Spiro ducts and and an exhaust fan with the capacityof 1000 m3/h is also planned to be installed in the workshop.
The heating system within the maintenance hall shall be carried out with wall-mounted
electric unit heaters. The electric unit heaters shall be controlled by the supplied thermostats.
The workshop ventilation in the summer period will be natural by occasional opening ofdoors and windows. As for the winter period, two, hand-operated, wall-mounted exhaust fanswith the capacity of 550 m3/h each, are planned.
Hazardous Matter Storage
The hazardous matter storage is container-type building of dimensions 2.44x6.06m,
h=2.59m, t=12cm, steel structure on the reinforced concrete slab d=10cm. One container isplanned.
Roof cover and wall coating: prefabricated plasticized steel trapezoidal panels over a 120
min. fire rated box beam sub-structure. The floor shall be carried out as a double floor, with
galvanized grating, mesh size 30x30 m, below which a bundwall made of welded sheet
protected with a coating resistant to acids and similar matters shall be installed. The doors
shall be panel, double doors, sliding along the entire width of the container.

136_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 56 Hazardous matter storage (Source: IDP Book 1/2 Architectural design,
Energoprojekt Industrija, May 2019)
Diesel Fuel Pump Station
The pump station is internal-type for fuel supply to the machinery and trucks. (Source: IDP
Book 6/6 Mechanical Installation Design, Energoprojekt Industrija, May, 2019)
It is located between the internal road and the green belt on one side and between theadministration building and the workshop with the vehicle washing area on the other.

137_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 57 Internal diesel fuel pump station (Source: IDP Book 1/2 Mechanical Installations
Design, Energoprojekt Industrija, May 2019)
The fuel storage shall be carried out in underground double-shell tanks with the capacity of
50m³, in the green surface area.

138_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 58 Hazardous matter storage (Source: IDP Book 1/2 Mechanical Installations Design,
Energoprojekt Industrija, May 2019)
The fuel delivery is with fuel tank trucks by a special one-way road, which is closed during
the unloading of fuel. The unloading connection shall be located in a manhole within thegreen belt, with the cover secured by a lock..
The pipelines shall be installed underground from the unloading connection to the tank and in
a concrete channel from the tank to the fuel dispensers. The relief pipe shall be elevated at
cca. 2.2 m in the green area. The tank shall be provided with all the required connections andall the metering and control equipment as required the regulations. The fuel status and fuelconsumption control, as well as the control of status in the double shell of the tank will be
carried out from the room within the administration building.
Hydrotechnical installation
The Operative Platform and the buildings on it shall have the following hydro-technicalinstallations and systems: (Source: IDP Book 3/8 Hydrotechnical Installations Design,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019):-

outdoor and indoor sanitary water supply network
outdoor water supply network with the connection for the car washing equipment
outdoor and indoor hydrant network
outdoor and indoor fecal sewerage network
process water from vehicles washing with the settling tankoily water street gutters and oily storm water sewerage with the settling tank and lightfluids separator
fecal water treatment for buildings from BEP, CDW and Operative Platform

139_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The hydraulic installations of the Operative Platform are planned to be connected to theexternal hydraulic installations of the entire landfill complex, located in the immediate
vicinity of the platform.
Sanitary water networks shall be connected to the internal sanitary water network system thatis further connected to the municipal water supply network.
Firewater network shall be connected to the outdoor hydrant water network of the complex
which shall be supplied from the firewater tank, with the capacity 75 m3, located in theimmediate vicinity of the complex entrance, which is refilled from the municipal watersupply network.
Industrial water distribution lines shall be connected to the outdoor sanitary water
distribution lines. The water supply network shall be carried out with polyethylene water
pipes.
Fecal water sewerage of the Vinca complex, as well as of the buildings from the Operative
Platform (about 200 employees), shall run into the fecal waters treatment (WWT) package
unit which located within the Operative Platform . The WWT unt capacity is 100 ES. The
purified waters shall outflow to the perimeter storm waters channel and out of the boundariesof the complex.
The fecal sewage system of the Vinča - Municipal Waste Water Complex flows into the
package sewage treatment unit located within the operational platform. The device is generic,prefabricated, with a capacity of 100ES and works on the principle of biodegradation using the
Floating Bed technology. The projected daily flow rate of the device is 1500 l/day and theorganic load is 6000 gBPK5/day.
The flow of water through the device is gravitational, without the use of pumps, so that thereturn flow of the water to the system in the event of a power failure is prevented. The stagesof treatment are as follows:
-

-

-

-

The waste water from the network enters the first part of the plant where thepreliminary deposition and separation of large waste takes place which prevents its
passage into further stages of purification.
The second stage of purification is the biological degradation of organic matter, by the
deep aeration system. It is intensified by the floating bed system of floating biofilm
carriers.
The next phase is aerobic stabilization and deposition of mineralized sludge. The
activated sludge from this phase mixes with the precipitated material from thepreliminary deposition phase and prevents the occurrence of odor.
Finally, such purified and cleared water flows into the last chamber with the overflow,where the two final stages of treatment take place - filtration adsorption anddisinfection.

Such purified water is of high quality and can be discharged into an open watercourse. The
purified water is discharged into a channel near the operating platform.
140_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The device is compact in design. It is made from high density polyethylene (HDPE). It is
manufactured by spiral coil technology, which ensures maximum shape stability during burial.
This material has the following advantages:-

It is chemically resistant to most chemically aggressive substances
Resistant to abrasion, corrosion and electrolytically stable
thermally resistant (-30 ° C to + 80 ° C)
Lasting - long exposure to atmospheric influences does not affect the stability andfunctionality of the device (lifetime up to 50 years)
It does not pollute the environment or the contents inside the device, preventing thedevelopment of algae and bacteria
UV stable

The device is automatic, so it does not need constant monitoring. Occasional checking of its
operation compliant to the manufacturer's instructions is required.
The investor is obliged to enter into a contract with a registered organization for maintenanceof the device and possible removal of waste during the cleaning of the device.
The quality of the treated water discharged from the device after treatment meets therequirements of the Regulation on Emission Limit Values for Pollutants in Waters and the
Deadlines for their Reaching ("Official Gazette of the RS", Nos.67 / 11 and 48/12) for
discharging the water into Category II watercourses.
Relatively clean storm waters from the buildings' roofs freely discharge in the environment
around the building.
Oily storm waters from the Operative Platform (parkings, car washing, filling stations) iscollected and run to the oily waters separator with the settling tank. The oily waters separator
flow rate is 70 l/s. Upon the treatment these waters also run into to the perimeter storm
waters channel.
All the ground sewerage pipes are made of plastic, of adequate bearing capacity to beinstalled in the ground below the roads and paved surfaces.
Water Balance - Operative Platform-

Planned consumption for sanitary purposes is 1.10 l/s.
Planned consumption for vehicles washing is 1.10 l/s.
Planned consumption for the firewater hydrant network is 10 l/s.
Expected fecal waters flow is 1.1 l/s.
Expected flow of process waters from vehicles washing is 1.10 l/s.
Expected oily storm waters flow is 68.8 l/s.

Electrical Installations on the Platform

141_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Power supply of consumers in the newly designed facility is envisaged from the newlyconstructed transformer station TS-2, 630kVA, 10kV/0,4kV (Source: IDP Book 4/5
Electrical Installations Design, Energoprojekt Industrija, januar 2019.).
Lighting installation will be carried out as overhead, recessed and reflector LED lighting,with adequate power and protection.
In the hallway of the administration building and the staircase, anti-panic lamps withaccumulator batteries with 1h autonomy, are provided with an appropriate inscription orarrows indicating the direction of movement in case of evacuation.
Switching on and off of the lighting installation will be manual by an appropriate number ofwall mounted switches. In all premises of the administrative building, the corresponding
number of monophase and triphase connectors for general and special purposes is planned.
External and Internal Lightning Protection
The Operating Platform lightning installation consist of an internal and external lightning
protection installation that is galvanically interconnected and provides effective protection
against atmospheric discharges.
The system's external lightning protection installation consists of:- the air termination system,- the down conductor system conducting to the earthing conductors and- the earth termination system.

The down conductors will be made from a galvanized steel strip, Fe/Zn 20mm x 3mm. They
will be placed on the facade of the building, on appropriate supports or in concrete pillars.
The earthing conductor of the administrative building will be executed as a foundation
earthing. From the earthing conductor, an appropriate number of terminals will be placed toconnect all earthing conductors of adjacent buildings, the equipotential bond rails, the down
conductors, the vertical gutters, etc.
The protection against indirect contact of metal parts, which are not under live voltage innormal operating conditions, but may be in the event of a malfunction, will be achieved byautomatically switching off the power supply. The power supply system in this case is the
TN-C-S system.

142_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Telecommunications and Signal Installations
The telecommunications and signaling installations are forseen in the Administration
Building and in the Workshop. Near the diesel fuel pump station one PTZ video surveilancecamera will be installed. The camera will be connected via network switch, to the video
server and the working station in the gate house. (Source: IDP Book 5/4 Telecommunications
and Signalling Installations Design, Energoprojekt Industrija, May, 2019).
Fire Alarm System
The fire alarm system will be installed in the Administration Building. This system in
Administration Building and the Workshop will consist of:- fire alarm control panel- automatic smoke detectors- manual fire alarm notification devices- sirens and- power supply.
Fire alarm control panel will be installed in the entrance corridor, and shall have one adressable
loop for the alarms. This fire alarm control panel will be connected by an optical cable to themain fire alarm control panel in the gate house, where there will be a fire watcher 24/7.
Automatic smoke detectors will be installed in each room exept in the toilets. Manual fire
alarm notification devices will be installed at building exits. Alarming people in the building
will be by sirens. Detectors and sirens will be connected to the fire alarm control panel that
ensures transmission of the signals and of power at least 30 minutes in flame.
Two outlets will be installed in the Workshop, one for the IP telephone set and the other for thecomputer working station. Those outlets will be connected to the panel in the Administration
Building.
Traffic Solution – Operative Platform
Access to the Operative Platform shall be carried out by the internal road of the complex. Theinternal road width in the Operative Platform zone is 7m. (Source: IDP Book 2/8 Road
Design, Energoprojekt Industrija, May, 2019).
The traffic solution concept on the Operational landfill platform is based on the creation of
three zones. The first, independent, zone is the Administration Building with the parking lot.
The second zone is the diesel fuel pump station, with a road connection to the third zone. The
third zone includes the Workshop with the car wash area, hazardous matter containers, truck,
supply vehicles and machinery parking lot.
Parking is provided for the parking of employees’ and visitors’ vehicles. Twenty parking
places are foreseen in this area, and one is reserved for persons with disabilities. Trucks andmachinery parking is located in the depth of the complex. Parking lot dimensions are 4.0x10m,
143_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

i.e. 4.5x10m. In this zone there are 5 more parking places for delivery vehicles or employees’
vehicles with dimension of 2.50x5.00m.
The diesel fuel pump station operates independently with regard to the roads. The vehicles
drive in to the station for tanking, at two tanking points and if there is no need to remain on theplatform, they leave.
For vehicles requiring repair, washing or parking, an appropriate traffic connection is provided.
The movement of vehicles along the Operational landfill platform shall be carried out as thetwo-way.
Roads will be carried out as a rigid (concrete) road structure on the adequate base course. Total
thickness of road construction is t = 67 cm.
All the facilities on the platform will be functionally separated, they will have concrete curbing
with an elevation of 12cm or marked by horizontal traffic signs.
5. The Upper Platform
The Upper Platform is planned on the construction plot KP6-7 and it is intended for thecollection and evacuation of:- Atmospheric water- Leachate water
On the Upper Platform, with an approximate surface area f 16,500 m2, the following ponds will
be built:- One atmospheric water collection pond,- Two leachate water collection ponds.

144_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 59 The position of structures on the Upper Platform(Source: IDP Book 3/5 Hydrotechnical installation design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering,
May, 2019)
Evacuation of Atmospheric Water
Atmospheric waters collected in the ponds on the Upper Platform, terrain level 160.00 (mnm)are waters from the left and the right perimeter canal around the new landfill and the canal thattransport the water from the operating platform. (Source: IDP Book 3/5 Hydrotechnicalinstallation design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
The designed capacity of the atmospheric water collection pond is accepted in the case of a 25
year rainfall of 24 hour duration (condition of PE “Srbijavode”).
For the adopted criterion, the amount of rain water which reaches the pond on the Upper
Platform is 177.67 l/s with accepted volume of 4,000 m3 with the criterion of 6h of retaining
water in the pond. This volume is sufficient for multi hour retaining without discharge of waterfrom the pond. The pond is of trapezoid shape, base dimensions: 54.5 m x 8 m, depth of water
4.5 m, slope grade 1:1.5.
The atmospheric water collection pond is designed as follows (observed from top to bottom):- HDPE coating;- Geotextile;- Coating for gas evacuation that prevents the forming of gas “pockets” underneath the
HDPE coating;145_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________- Underground pipe for water drainage (in the perimeter canal filled with drain gravel atthe bottom of the pond).
It is planned to transfer the pump and the pipeline to evacuate the atmospheric water from thislagoon, to the tank chamber for the purposes of fire protection of the facilities at the landfill aswell as for washing the wheels of vehicles in the control zone. Any excess water will betransported to the right arm of the main perimeter canal.

Figure 60 Atmospheric water pond on the Upper Platform (Source: IDP Book 3/5
Hydrotechnical installation design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
Evacuation of Leachate Water
The system for the drainage of leachate water from the new landfill is separated into two parts,
according to the types of waste:- System for the collection of leachate water from the interim communal waste
landfill and a part for the Unprocessed Waste Landfill (unprocessed waste I andII)- System for collection of leachate from the landfill for residue generated after
waste processing in the EfW plant (residues I and II).
Therefore, the collected leachate water from both parts of the new landfill is drained intoleachate ponds at the level of 160.00mnm.

146_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Two ponds, 2,000 m3 each (total capacity 4,000 m3) are designed on the Upper Platform. The
ponds are of trapezoid shape, bottom base dimensions: 28.5 m x 6 m, depth of water 4.5 m,
slope grade 1:1.5.
The leachate waters collection ponds are designed as follows (observed from top to bottom):- HDPE lining;- Geotextile;- Coating for gas evacuation (connected with biothorns) that prevents the formingof gas “pockets” underneath the HDPE coating;
Underground pipe for the evacuation of water from the pond.

Figure 61 Leachate Water Pond on the Upper Platform (Source: IDP Book 3/5 Hydrotechnicalinstallation design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
The leachate pond for the collection of leachate water from the part of the landfill where
unprocessed leachate is landfilled (unprocessed waste I and II), receives the leachate waterfrom the IBA zone (part of the EfW plant which is not the subject of this study).
, A pump station for the delivery and return of that water to the EfW plant (maximum
recirculation, depending of technological needs of the plant), by a delivery pipeline is planned
for the water from this pond.

147_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The leachate water is evacuated by gravity from the separation manhole of upper leachate pondby a Ø 315 pipeline to the second leachate pond on the Lower Platform (where Leachate
Treatment Plant is planned).
6. The Lower Platform
On the Lower Platform (Source: IDP Book 3/6 Hydrotechnical installation design,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019) located north-east from the existing (“old”)
landfill body that will be shut down and remediated, on the construction plot KP6-7, thefollowing will be collected:- Leachate water from the old landfill,- Leachate water from the new landfill- Atmospheric water from:• The “old“ landfill,• The downhill access road.
On the Lower Platform, with a surface area of 38,680 m², the following are placed:- Atmospheric water pond, surface area cca 1,900 m²- Leachate pond, surface area 2 x cca 2,900 m² and cca 2,300 m²- Leachate treatment plant (LTP Unit), 1,050 m²

Figure 62 The position of structures on the Lower Platform (Source: IDP Book 3/6
Hydrotechnical installation design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)148_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The Collection and Evacuation of Atmospheric Water
The perimeter canals for the collection and evacuation of atmospheric water are marked aroundthe landfill body, starting from the highest elevation and directed to the left and the right side.
The left and the right perimeter canals discharge into the lower stormwater pond on the Lower
Platform, terrain elevation 90.00 (mnm). (Source: IDP Book 3/6 Hydrotechnical installation
design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, January 2019.)
The designed capacity of the atmospheric water collection pond is adopted in the case of a 25
year rainfall of 24 hour duration (the condition of the PE “Srbijavode”).
For the adopted criterion, the amount of stormwater which reaches the pond on the Lower
Platform is 171.47 l/s with the adopted volume of 3,700 m3 with the criterion of 6h of water
retension in the pond, in accordance with the best practice in the industry. This volume issufficient for multi hour retention, without discharge of the water from the pond.
In normal conditions, which do not imply rain of an intensity higher than the adopted, thedischarge of water will be controlled with a maximum flow of 10% in relation to the inflow.
From the lagoon, the collected atmospheric water is discharged by gravity through a pipeline(diameter DN 400, length L = 100 m) into the Ošljan stream. On this pipeline, it is planned to
install a measuring device for the discharged water, which is connected to a probe for
automatic monitoring of water levels in the lagoon.
The atmospheric water collection pond is designed as follows (observed from top to tobottom):- HDPE coating;- Geotextile;- Coating for gas evacuation that prevents the forming of gas “pockets” under the HDPE
coating;- Clay material 0.5 m thick (permeability < 1 x 10-9 m/s)
- Underground pipe for water drainage (in the perimeter canal filled with drain gravel atthe bottom of the pond).
The pond is of trapezoid cross section of dimensions: 10 m and 22 m in the bases, length 36 m,
maximum water depth 4.0 m. The grade of the pond sides is 1:1.5.
At the canal inlets into the pond, inlet structures are designed for the hydraulic surge relief.
Level of ground water under the stormwater pond (and each leachate pond) are reduced by two
drain pipes DN 150 that are designed under and around the pond. The drain pipes flow into theoutlet drainage pipeline DN 225 and from it into the Ošljan stream they are discharged bygravity to the Ošljan stram. The length of the drainage pipeline to the discharge into the Ošljan
stream is L= 220 m.

149_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 63. Cross section of the atmospheric water lagoon on the Lower Platform (Source: IDP
Book 3/6 Hydrotechnical installation design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)
Collection and Evacuation of Leachate Waters
The new landfill drainage system drains the leachate water from the ponds on the Upper
Platform to the Lower Platform ponds. The leachate water is evacuated from the Upper
Platform ponds by gravity to the leachate waters ponds on the Lower Platform.
Leachate waters from the existing ("old") landfill that will be closed and recultivated (not the
subject of this project) flow to the leachate water ponds on the Lower Platform.
Three ponds/lagoons, with a total capacity of 13,800 m3, have been designed for the receptionof leachate waters on the lower platform.(two ponds with a capacity of 2 x 5,100 m3 and one
pond with a capacity of 3,600 m3) .
The leachate water collection ponds are designed as follows (observed from top to bottom):- HDPE coating;- Geotextile;- Coating for gas evacuation that prevents the forming of gas “pockets” under the HDPE
coating;- Two underground pipes DN 150 for drainage of water (in the perimeter canal filledwith drain gravel at the bottom of the pond).
The ponds have dimensions: (volume 5,100m3) 9.30 m x 65 m in the bases, length 61 m,(volume 3,600m3) dimensions 7.0 x 52m, depth of water maximum 4.5 m. The grade of pondsides is 1:1.5.
150_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The pond with the capacity of 3,600 m3 will be used for mixing the water from the other two
ponds
One pond with the capacity of 5,100m3 collects the leachate waters from the "old" landfill, andthe other pond with the capacity of 5,100m3 collects the leachate waters from the leachatewaters pond on the Upper platform (leachate from the new landfill).
After the old landfill is shut down and recultivated, and after the leaching of leachate from theold landfill, the leachate will be pumped into a pond on th Upper Platform.
For the purpose of leachate water pumping to the LTP plant, a pump with following
characteristrics is selected: Q = 5 l/s, H = 15 m. The pumping system will consist of one
working and one spare pump.
After treatment, the treated leachate waters are lead outside the landfill complex, to a recipient.

Figure 64 Cross-section of the leachate water pond on the Lower platform (Source: IDP Book
3/6 Hydrotechnical installations design, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)151_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

6a. Leachate Water Treatment Zone (LTP Unit)
The leachate treatment plant (LTP) is on Lower platform, construction plot KP6-7, (Source:
IDP Technology design, Delta Inženjering, 2018.).

Figure 65 Figure 8 Location of the zone for the LTP (Source: IDP Technology design, DeltaInženjering, 2019)
Leachate Water Generation
Leachate water occurs as a result of atmospheric waters leaching through the body of thelandfill and/or as a result of the process of biochemical degradation of organic matter.
An extremely important process at each landfill is the process of degradation of organic wastematerials and inorganic substances and their elution from the bottom of the landfill to thesurrounding environment. The degradation processes at the landfill can in principle be regarded
as biodegradable processes that take place in the presence of living organisms (bacteria, algae,
mushrooms, etc.) and processes of chemical degradation of organic and inorganic substances.
The essence of biodegradable processes is the biodegradation of complex carbohydrates,
proteins, fats, biopolymers and artificial organic products susceptible to degradation to simple
organic acids, carbon dioxide and methane. The examining of the processes that take place inthe body of the landfill has established that the process of biological decomposition of organic
152_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

waste takes place in several stages. The processes in phases are variable and their intensity andspeed depend on the environment conditions.
In the initial stage, the leachate waters in the body of the landfill are formed by aerobic
decomposition of waste, forming a complex solution of approximately neutral pH value. This
process usually lasts for several days or weeks and does not have a significant impact on thequality of the leachate waters. However, the process of aerobic degradation releases a large
amount of heat so that the temperature of the filtrate can reach a value of up to 80 - 90°C,
which later contributes to the intensifying the degradation process.
By further development of the decomposition process, oxygen trapped in the pores disappears
and anaerobic conditions are created. In an early anaerobic stage, the filtrate contains highconcentrations of soluble organic substances and has a low pH value, around 5. It is an "acidphase" or an acetogenesis phase. Ammonia concentrations are raised, and the landfill filtrate isenriched by many inorganic ions, such as calcium, manganese, iron, copper, zinc, chromium
and others, and anions such as sulphate, chloride, nitrate nitrate, nitrite, phosphate and other inlandfill filtrate. Fatty acids break down to acetic acid.
The methanogenesis phase can occur after several months or even years. The leachate water
becomes neutral or slightly alkaline and contains significant amounts of different compounds.
The change occurs due to the rapid development of a special group of microorganisms thatconvert acetic acid and hydrogen into methane and carbon dioxide. The amount of acidproduced decreases due to the production of methane.
The last phase of biodegradation in the body of the landfill, the so-called "maturation" phase, ischaracterized by the possibility of re-establishing the aerobic environment, by the completionof the conversion of organic matter into methane and carbon dioxide, and consequently asudden decrease in the amount of generated landfill gas because a large amount of nutrients iswashed from the landfill body while the remaining part is poorly biodegradable.
Most of the inorganic material in the landfill, especially heavy metals and other toxic elements,
is in a solid phase. When such material is deposited as waste at the landfill, the process of its
chemical degradation begins. In doing so, a series of inorganic compounds such as heavy metal
cations and other inorganic and organic substances are released.
The basic factors that define the degradation capacity of soluble matter in the leachate waters
are:- Ions types and concentrations in solution,- Acidity of thesolution,- Redox potential of the solution,- Temperature.

The basic chemically degradable processes of inorganic matter are: hydrolysis, hydration,oxidation, and others. The velocity of chemical degradation depends on the conditions of theenvironment and on the strength of the chemical bond between different elements.

153_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 66 Phases of biodegradation waste at the landfill (EPA, 2000)
Characteristics of Leachate Waters from the Landfill
The leachate water is a complex, heterogeneous mixture of a variable composition, andconsists of various organic and inorganic compounds and microorganisms. The generalcharacteristics of the leachate waters from the landfill are a strong odor and specific dark color,high concentrations of different compounds, as well as the high values of the indicators oforganic and inorganic pollution (BOD 5 and COD).
The composition of the leachate landfill water depends on many factors such as climate
conditions, waste composition, landfill age, waste handling processes at the landfill, hydrogeological conditions, liquid diffusion rate through waste, temperature in the landfill body,moisture content, pH value, chemical and (micro) biological activity within the landfill bodyand the impact of weather conditions, depending on the seasons (McArdle et al., 1988;
Westlake, 1997). Leachate water contains a wide variety of inorganic and organic pollutants,
viruses, bacteria, parasites...

154_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

According to the literature data, (Renou et al., 2008), a general division of landfills according
to age was carried out to young landfills, medium landfills and old landfills. Concentrations oforganic components in leachate waters for young and old landfills, compared to theirconcentrations in municipal leachate waters and groundwater, are shown in the following
tables (Ngo et al.).

Based on the literature data and the results of the analyses of the leachate waters frommunicipal waste landfills, a characteristic composition of the leachate waters was given in thefollowing table (Source: Technology design, Delta Inženjering, 2018):
Parameter, mg/l
pH value
Conductivity (μS/cm)
Dry residue
Organic compounds
Total organic carbon (TOC)
Biological oxygen demand (BOD 5 )Chemical oxygen demand (COD)
BOD 5 /COD (ratio)
Organic nitrogen
Inorganic macro components
Total phosphorus
Chlorides
Sulfates
Hydrogen bicarbonate
SodiumPotassium
Ammonium nitrogen (NH3-N)
Calcium
Magnesium
Iron

Value
4.5 – 9.0
2500 – 35000
2000 – 60000
30 – 29000
20 – 57000
140 – 152000
0.02 – 0.80
14 – 2500
0.1 – 23
150 – 4500
8 – 7750
610 – 7320
70 – 7700
50 – 3700
50 – 2200
10 – 7200
30 – 15000
3 – 5500

155_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Manganese
Silicon dioxide
Heavy metals
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
CobaltCopperLead
Mercury
NickelZinc

0.03 – 1400
4 – 700.01 – 1
0.0001 – 0.4
0.02 – 1.5
0.005 – 1.5
0.005 – 10
0.001 - 5
0.00005 – 0.16
0.015 – 13
0.03 - 1000

Leachate Water Treatment
The purification method of landfill leachate waters is conditioned by its variable inflow andhigh organic load, as well as by the presence of other inorganic pollutants such as heavy
metals. As organic pollution is dominant, biological methods are most often used for leachate
purification. They are based on microbiological degradation of biodegradable organic matter
dispersed in the leachate water. Organic matter is partly transformed into biomass, and partly
into harmless oxidation products, which provides the energy for the metabolism of bacteria.
For the needs of the design of the leachate water treatment plant (LTP plant), the testing of thequality of the treatment water at the Vinča landfill was carried out. Test results are given in thetable.
Table 13 The adopted quality of the leachate water for the plant design(Source: IDP Technology Design, Delta Inženjering, 2018)
Parameter
Air temperature
Water temperature
Odor
Visible waste
pH value
Conductivity
Hydrocarbon index
Chemical oxygen demand (COD)
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD 5 )
AOX (adsorbable organic halides)
Total nitrogen (TN)Ammonium
Nitrates
Nitrits
Sulphates
Chlorides
Fluorides
SodiumIron

Unit

Sample1

Sample 2

Average value

°C
°C

32.0
23.6
present
present
8.1
41400
<0.1
16000
4000
<0.05
2000*
1000
32
<0.03
1242
5350
0.58
2124
35.4

32.0
23.2
present
present
7.8
41900
0.01
16000
4000
<0.05
2000*
1000
34
<0.03
1248
5350
0.51
2189
36.1

32
23.4
present
present
7.95
41650
0.055
16000
4000
0.05
2000
1000
33
0.03
1245
5350
0.545
2156.5
35.75

μS/cm
mg/l
mgO 2 /l
mgO 2 /l
mg/l
mg/l
mgN/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l

156
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Manganese
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Chromium
Lead
Cadmium
Mercury
Arsenic. mg/l
Total cyanide, mg/l
Phenolic index, mg/l

mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l

0.86
2723
<0.5
<1
245
0.0039
0.12
12.2
0.027

1.99
2253
<0.5
<1
255
0.0178
0.17
5.5
0.047

1.425
2488
0.5
1
250
0.0108
0.145
8.85
0.037

Thr Required Quality of Purified Lachate Water
As Ošljanski potok is the recipient of purified leachate water from the Vinča landfill, thepollutants concentration in the effluent must be within the limited emission values defined by
the Regulation on emission limit values of pollutants in waters and deadlines for theirachievement ("Official Gazette of RS No. 67/11, 48/12 and 1/16), part II – Other wastewater,
no. 2 – Emission values limits for pollutants in wastewater that originate from surface waste
disposal, Table 2.1. Emission values limits at discharging point in surface water and Table 2.2.
Emission values limits before mixing with other process wastwaters.
The required water quality is shown in the following Table.
Table 14 Emission values limits on discharging point in surface water (Source: IDP
Technology Design, Delta Inženjering, 2018.)
Parameter
Water temperature
pH value
Suspended substances
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD 5 )Total inorganic nitrogen
Total phosphorus
Hydrocarbon index
Nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N)
Toxicity to Fish (TF)
Adsorbable Organic Halides (AOX)
Total chrome
Chrome VI
Lead
CopperNickelZinc
Mercury
Cadmium
Arsenic
Total cyanides
Sulfides

Unit
°C
mg/l
mgO 2 /l
mgO 2 /l
mgN/l
mgP/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l

Limit value30
6.5 - 9
35
200
20
70
3
10
2
2
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.5
1
2
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.2
1

157
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Based on the above tables, the LTP is designed with guaranteed output values of purified
water, which are given in the tables.
Table 15 Guaranteed output parameters for the provided treatment plant for leachate water
treatment (Source: IDP Technology Design, Delta Inženjering, 2018)
Parameter
Water temperature
pH value
Suspended substances

Unit
°C

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)

mgO 2 /l

Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD 5 )Adsorbable Organic Halides (AOX)
Total inorganic nitrogen
Total phosphorus
Hydrocarbon index
Nitrite-nitrogen (NO 2 -N)
Toxicity to Fish (TF)
Total chrome
Chrome VI
Lead
CopperNickelZinc
Mercury
Cadmium
Arsenic
Total cyanides
SulfidesmgO 2 /l
mg/l
mgN/l
mgP/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l

mg/l

Limit value30
6.5 - 935200 (for COD <4000 mg/l,
in other cases, 95% of the input
concentration)
20
0,5
70
3
10
2
2
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.5
1
2
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.2
1

The plant is dimensioned to operate at temperatures between -5°C and 25°C. If the temperature
is out of this range, there is a possibility that the guaranteed emission standards will not be
achieved. In this case, Article 4, paragraph 2, of the Regulation on emission limit values ofpollutants in waters and deadlines for their achievement ("Official Gazette of RS" No. 67/11,
48/12 and 1/16) shall apply: " In case the emission limit value can not be reached, it isnecessary to achieve the appropriate efficiency of the wastewater treatment process.
These temperatures represent limit values for optimal continuous automatic operation. If thetemperature is outside this range, then the Operator must intervene to adjust operating
parameters and maintain guaranteed discharge levels. (For example, additional recirculation of
the leachate water).
The efficiency of the treatment process is expressed as the percentage of the reduction of agiven pollution parameter or as the amount of pollutant released per unit of the obtained
product or per unit of consumed raw material from Annex 2 of the said Regulation. It is
calculated based on the pollutant load of wastewater and treated wastewater.”158_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The Quantity of Generated Leachate Water
The quantity of leachate water from the landfill has been estimated based on hydrological,
morphological, geological and hydrogeological bases, as well as on the conditions at thecomplex. In the dimensioning of the leachate retention pools and other facilities, thecontinuous rainfall of 20 days for a return period of 25 years was used.
The quantities of leachate waters to be accepted and treated are given in the Table.
Table 16 Quantity of generated leachate water (Source: IDP Technology Design, DeltaInženjering, 2018)
Year
Collected leachate water(m3/year)
Leachate water for EfWplant (m3/year)
Leachate water to betreated (m3/year)

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

96,00091,90092,00082,50041,800

8,600

3,300

2,400

0

6,000

12,00012,00012,000

8,600

3,300

2,400

90,00090,00081,90070,50029,8000

0

0

The quantity of leachate waters shown in Table 16 represents the sum of the leachate waters
generated at the existing and the new landfill. Quantification of the quantities of leachatewaters for the EfV represents the annual effluent consumption of leachate waters for the APCrprocess (instead of raw water/city water, the leachate water is used to stabilize the APCr).
Therefore, the LTP plant processes the excess leachate waters that will not be reused in the
APCr curing process.
From Table 16 it can be seen that:- in the first year and a half, all collected leachate waters must be treated on LTP and
the surplus (exceeding LTP capacity) must be stored in lagoons with a capacity of
13,800 m3 - this while EfW is still under construction;- when the EfV starts operating, it will have an annual leachate water consumption of
12,000 m3, so only excess leachate water will be treated at LTP;
- as EfV leachate water consumption exceeds the flushing production, it will bepossible to eliminate LTP (forecast after 5 years).
In accordance with the production of leachate water and its needs for biogas production in the
EfW plant, the wastewater treatment plant is dimensioned to process 90,000 m3/year with areserve of about 20%, that is, the capacity of the plant is 13 m3/h.
The leachate treatment plant will only operate for five years, after which all leachate water willbe transported to the EfW plant (not subject to this project).
Concept of the LTP
For the needs of evacuation the water from the landfill body , a drainage system that drains allleachate waters to the lagoon and from it to the LTP plant is planned. After the treatment, this159_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

water can be taken to the Ošljanski potok and further into the Danube. The leachate water flow
chart is shown in the figure.

Figure 67 Leachate water flow chart (Source: IDP Technology Design, Delta Inženjering,
2018)
Drainage channels along the periphery of the landfill collect the leachate water and take it to
the lagoons - the upper one that collects leachate water from the "old" landfill, and the lower
lagoon that collects the leachate water from the new landfill.
The pumping station at the lower lagoon is expected to transport the collected water flows to
the EfW plant after the LTP is shut down.
The Leachate treatment plant is dimensioned to satisfy:- the required degree of treatment- guaranteed performance of the plant- conditions for discharge into the recipient
The Vinča landfill Leachate Treatment Plant consists of the following phases:
1. Pretreatment
2. Acidification (pH value adjustment)
3. Reverse osmosis (RO)
4. Evaporation of the concentrate from reverse osmosis,
5. Finishing reverse osmosis (FRO).
In order for the process to run smoothly, the required heat is provided by combustion of a partof biogas in a biogas boiler or in a boiler with an electric heater.

160_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Pre-treatment
The pre-treatment on the LTP plant involves mechanical treatment on roto-sieves and sandfilters. Each filter is a multilayer filter (sand + anthracite). In the pre-treatment, sand, sludge
and other inert particles from the flowing water are removed.
On the inlet pipeline to the roto-sieve, there is a device that captures impurities larger than 2
mm, in order to protect the equipment in the further treatment process. The pre-treatment
comprises of:- Roto-sieves, with the sieve size of 0.5 mm- Sand filters, intended for the elimination of particles larger than 30 μm, within the RO
stage
The sand filter is used for mechanical filtration of the water solution, which is used to removerough mechanical suspended particles from the raw water. The sand filter is filled with quartz
grit and sand of particular granulation. The filtration takes place through the flow of water in a
downward direction (gravity). After the filter fill is saturated, a counter-flow flushing isprovided.
The quantity of water required for flushing is 500-600 l/min per m2 of the filter surface, and
1.0-1.5 m3 of compressed air per minute and of m2 of filter surface. Filter cleaning takes 15 to
20 minutes, and the flushing frequency depends on the degree of the filter fill saturation.
After counter-flow flushing, the filter fillings is flushed in gravitational direction in order tostabilize the filtration layer and prepare the mass for regular operation.
Acidification
It is necessary to eliminate ammonia, which is one of the leachate components. Free ammonia
can pass through the membrane of the RO system and end up in the permeate (treatedleachate). Therefore, the filtered leachate is acidified using sulfuric acid, in order to convert
ammonia into ammonium sulfate, which remains in the concentrate during treatment at the RO
membrane.
Reverse osmosis
Reverse osmosis is based on the use of semipermeable membranes, a selective barrier thatallow the passage of certain components, while retaining other components of the solution (thecriterion is the size of the molecules/ions of the dissolved substances). The flow of matter
through the membrane is kinetically defined by applying pressure, vapor pressure, hydrostaticpressure, electrical potential, and temperature.
Concentrated impurities are retained on the side of the membrane that is under pressure, andthe purified water is passed to the other side of the membrane.
Depending on the leachate quality (mostly disolved salts and organic matter), the percentage ofthe generated permeate will be about 50% to 70% of the water inflow.
161_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The permeate goes to the clean water pool, from where it is transported to the recipient, with aprevious flow measurement, and the concentrate from the RO membranes is transported further
to the treatment on the vacuum evaporator.
A two-stage RO will be used at the LTP plant..

Figure 68 Schematic diagram of two-stage RO (Puretec Industrial Water, 2012 – 2015)
The efficiency of certain components removing by two-step reverse osmosis is given in thefollowing Table.
Component
Monovalent ion
Polyvalent ion
Ammonium ion at pH 6.5
Organic components

Removal rate
> 99.5%> 99.9%> 99.5%> 99.9%Evaporation - Vacuum Evaporator
In the evaporator, the concentrate from the first degree RO is thermally treated. Heating isachieved by circulating the heat through the mass of the solution. The evaporator operates
under vacuum, which allows lowering the boiling point of the water and separating the water
vapor from the salt at lower temperatures.
Nitric compounds - the ammonium in the leachate must be previously treated. Otherwise,ammonium would remain as steam instead of as liquid. As previously mentioned, for the
purposes of this process, the pre-treatment of ammonium will be carried out by acidification
process.

162_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The evaporation takes place in two phases. The first phase allows the evaporation of waterfrom the leachate under vacuum. In the second phase, the energy needed for evaporation iscreated by mechanical compression with steam.
The condensate generated in the first stage mostly does not contain dissolved salts and organic
compounds, and it remains within the limits allowed for release into the natural recipient.
In the second phase, after the evaporation of the water contained in the concentrated leachatefrom the first phase, a superconcentrate with a dry matter concentration of about 30% (between
20-30%) and it contains concentrated dissolved salts, nitrogen components, organic matter andmetals from leachate. The resulting superconcentrate is deposited at the landfill.
The condensate generated in the second phase is free from most of the dissolved salts andorganic compounds and is further transported to the reverse osmosis finishing system.
Reverse Osmosis Finishing
The reverse osmosis finishing system is installed after the vacuum evaporators, in order to treat
the condensate from the evaporator. The RO finishing system will remove possible residual
ammonia, salts and heavy metals traces and ensure that the parameters values are below theallowed limits for a natural recipient. The percentage of the permeate generated from the RO
condensate treatment system is 85-90%.
The concentrate from the reverse osmosis finishing will be recirculated into the leachate pretreatment tank (before the reverse osmosis membrane at the water line), whereas the permeate
from the second stage reverse osmosis shall go into the treated (clean) water pond, wherefrom,together with the permeate from the first stage reverse osmosis system, it will be transported
into the manhole and further to the recipient, with previous measurement of the flow.

163_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 69 Schematic diagram of LTP(Source: IDP Technology Design, Delta Inženjering, 2018)

Figure 70. Flow diagram of LTP process(Source: IDP Technology Design, Delta Inženjering, 2018)
The membranes in the reverse osmosis system must be periodically cleaned from theaccumulated organic and inorganic matter, in the CIP system that is located in the facility. To
the CIP tank, there are inlet pipelines for sodium hydroxide from a 15 m3 storage tank, forhydrochloric acid from the IBC containers, located in the RO facility, then clean water fromthe city water supply and return water from the first stage RO system.
Technical characteristics of the LTP equipment
164_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Based on the project documentation, (Source: IDP Project of Machine Installations andEquipment, Delta Inženjering, 2019), the basic technical characteristics of LTP equipment are
shown bellow.
Roto-sieve
Pre-treatment involves the leachate purification through the sieve, with following
characteristics:
Parameter
Units number
Annual water quantity
Removal rate
Water flow per unit
Sieve hole size
Power
Voltage

Unit
m3
%
m3/h
mm
kW
V

Value
2
90,000
80
7
0.5
0.37
3x400

Sand filters
Each reverse osmosis unit will have 2 sand filters with automatic counter-flow flushing (while
one is in operation, the other is flushing). For the calculation of the filter fill, the following is
adopted:-Capacity Q = 2 x 7,0 m3/h
The total height of the filter fill is 1000 mm.
Effective surface: P = 1.4 m2
Filter diameter: D = 1.3 m
The treatment of raw water in this device removes all floating particles larger than 30
m.
Filtration speed, when both filters are in operation: v = 4.6 m/h
Filtration speed, when one filter is in the flushing phase: v = 9.3 m/h,
Air quantity required for filter flushing: Qvaz = ~50 m3/h/m2
Water flow required for filter flushing: Qvod= 35 m3/h/m2
Water quantity required for one filter flushing (30 minutes): 17.5 m3

Reverse osmosis
The following table shows the reverse osmosis system characteristics:
Parameter

Unit
m3/d
m3/h
-

Units number
Maximal water amount per unit
Flow rate per unit
Number of membrane phases

Value
2
200
5.7
2

Membrane characteristics are shown in the following table:
165_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Parameter
Membrane type
Membrane surface area
Number of membranes

Unit
First phase
m2
-

Value
Organic, tubular and spirall/m2/h4.1

Specific designed permeate flow

≈ 1,321
36

Second phase
Membrane surface area

m2

≈ 450

Number of membranes-

12

Specific designed permeate flow2

11

l/m /hConsumption of chemicals is shown in the following table:
Parameter
Sulfuric acid 96%
AntiscalantBase reagent 1%
Acid reagent1%
Antifoam (93 to 96%)

Unit
t/y
t/y
kg/y
kg/y
t/y

Value
360
1
1,600
800
4

Vacuum evaporator
Vacuum ecaporator characteristics are shown in the following table:
Parameter
Average evaporator capacity
Maximum evaporator capacity
RO concentrate temperature
Required heat power

Unit
m3/h
m3/h
o
C
kW

Value
6
7.5
20
800

Required chemicals amount are shown in following table:
Parameter

Unit
t/y
m3/y
m3/y

Antifoam
Caustic soda (30%)
Phosphoric acid /75%)

Value
5
40
13

Reverse Osmosis Finishing
The reverse osmosis finishing dimensioning is based on the following data:166_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Parameter

Unit
m3/d
%

Number of units
Maximal water amount per unit
RO degree
Utilization rate

Value
1
6.5
1
80-90

Membrane characteristics are shown in following table:
Parameter
Membrane type
Membrane surface area
Number of membrane
Specific designed permeate flow
Permeate flow
Concentrate flow

Unitm2
l/m2/h
m3/h
m3/h

Value
Organic, tubular and spiral
≈ 560
15
4
5.5
1

Consumption of chemicals is shown in following table:
Parameter
Sulfuric acid 96%
Antiscalant 5%
Base reagent 1%
Acid reagent 1%
Antifoam (93 do 96%)
Biocide

Unit
t/y
t/y
kg/y
kg/y
t/y
t/y

Value
360
1
1,600
800
4
2.9

Characteristics of chemicals used in reverse osmosis
The following chemicals are used in the leachate water treatment, (Source: IDP Technology
Project, Delta Inženjering, 2018), in the reverse osmosis system:- sulfuric acid- antiscalants- acidic and basic component in CIP flushing equipment- sodium hydroxide- phosphoric acid- antifoam
Sulfuric acid
ConcentrationpH
Viscosity at 20°C
Density at 15°C
Freezing point
Baumé degree at 15°C
Annual consuption

96 %
<1
26.9
1.40 -1.841 kg/l
-15 °C
66 °Bé
380 t/y167_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Storage tank volume
Storage refilling frequency

15 m3
every 20 days

AntiscalantpH
Density at 15°C
Freezing point
Boiling point
Storage volume
Supply11.1 (5%)
1.3 kg/l-21 °C
100°C
1.5 t/y48 containers of 25 kg/y

CIP system, acidic component
Concentration
1%pH
2.3 (1%)
Density at 20°C
1.07 kg/l
Annual consumption 1.2 t/y
Supply48 containers of 25 kg/y
CIP system, base component
Concentration
1%pH
12.2 (1%)
Density at 15°C
1-17 kg/l
Annual consumption 2.4 t/y
Supply32 containers of 25kg/year
Sodium hydroxide
NaOH concentration
Viscosity at 25°C
Density at 20°C
Boiling point
Crystallization temperature
Annual consumption
Storage volume
Storage refilling frequency

30.5 %
14
1.22 kg/l (20%)
110°C-27°C (20%)
40 m3/y
5 m3
45 days

Phosphoric acid
Concentration
Density at 25 °C
Crystallization temperature
Annual consumption
Storage volume

75 %1.17 g/cm3 (30%)
21 °C (85%)
13 m3/y
5 m3168_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Storage refilling frequency

every 4 months

AntifoamDensity (20°C)
Concentration
Dynamic viscosity at 20°C
Boiling point
Crystallization temperature
Annual consumption
Storage volume
Storage refilling frequency

0.970 g/cm3
93 do 96 %90 – 145
235 °C-25 °C/-5 °C
11 t/y1 m3
monthly

Total chemical consumption in LTP, t/year
ChemicalAmountChemical
Sulfuric acid, 96%
380
Antifoam, (93-96%)
Antiscalant, 5%
1.5
Sodium hydroxide, 30%
CIP – base reagent, 1%
0.0024
phosphoric acid, 75%
CIP - acidic reagent, 1%0.0012
BiocideAmount
11
40
13
2.9

7. Protective dam of the old landfill body (support structure)
The support structure is planned on the construction plot KP6-7. It is located in thenortheastern part of the Vinča landfill complex, below the body of the existing - "old" landfill.
In order for the works on the construction of the supporting structure to be carried out
efficiently, it is necessary to carry out appropriate preparation works on the site before thecommencement of the works. Preparation works include the following group of works (Source:
PZI for rehabilitation of landfill landslide and stabilization of part of the Vinča landfill, Book
10 - Preparation works design, Hidrozavod DTD, 2018):-

Securing the front part of the landfill in the construction site zone
Excavation of a peripheral channel
Construction of access roads

The front of the landfill in the construction site is planned to be secured by Larssen sheet piles
type 605, length 6.0 m. Piling is carried out with a pneumatic hammer, up to a depth of 4.0 m.
Piled sheets will be 2.0 m above the ground level. Sheets will not be removed after thecompletion of the works.
The excavation of the peripheral channel is planned along the periphery of the existing landfill,in order to accept all the leachate waters that are currently freely spilled over the surrounding
areas.

The peripheral channel has a trapezoidal cross section, the width of the bottom is 0.8 m and theinclination of the slopes is 1:1. The total length of the channel is 446.10 m.
169_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________In order to transport the material from the borrow pit to the place of installation in the support
structure, an access road in the form of two roads is planned. The lengths of the planned roads
is 371.2 m and 421.30 m. During the execution of the works, a one way traffic of heavy
vehicles is envisaged, and for each road, different directions are used for the maximum
acceleration of the construction time and for the reduction of accidents in transport. The widthof the access road was adopted at 3.5 m. A road with a cover of crushed stone is foreseen. The
thickness of the road layer is 25 cm, and it is planned to install two layers, the lower layer with
31.5-63 mm granulation and 15 cm thick, and the upper layer with 0-31.5 mm granulation and15 cm thick.
Construction of the support structure
The construction of the support structure is planned on the lowest part of the drainage area ofthe "old" landfill, right next to the landfill. The support structure is located on the construction
plot KP6-7, at the northeastern part (Source: PZI for the rehabilitation of the landfill landslideand stabilization of part of the Vinča landfill, Book 1 – Support structure design, Hidrozavod
DTD, 2018).
The supporting structure has a trapezoidal cross-section, elevation point of the crown is 107
mnm. Due to the length of the slope, berms are provided on the inner and outer sides of the
supporting structure, at an elevation point of 99.0 mnm. The width of the supporting structure
crown is 6, 0 m. Berms are 4.0 m wide. The inclination of the slopes of the supporting structureare 1: 2, except for the slopes from the internal berm to the drainage trench, which is provided
with the inclination of 1: 3.

170_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 71 Cross-section and longitudinal cross-section of the support structure(Source: PZI for rehabilitation of the landfill landslide and stabilization of part of the Vinča
landfill, Book 1 – Hidrozavod DTD, 2018)
Due to the continuous leachate flow emerging from two places from the waste mass, a phased
construction of the support structure is planned. The design documentation defines thefollowing stages of construction of the support structure:---

Phase 1: Construction of a supporting structure from the northern slope of the hill to theboundary of the peripheral channel that regulates the leachate flow during the executionof works in Phase 1. In this phase, the support structure will be built up to the elevationof 99.0 mnm, which represents the level of berms of the support structure. For
continuation of the support structure, cascade cutting at the point of continuation will
be executed;
Phase 2: After the construction of the support structure and the drainage trench inPhase 1, the leachate from the peripheral channel is directed to a built drainage
collector that will drain the leachate water through the supporting structure. In thisphase, it is necessary to build a part of the supporting structure from the executed Phase
1 until it leans on the hill on the south side. The final elevation of the supporting
structure in this phase is 99.0 mnm;
Phase 3: This stage envisages the construction of a support structure along the entire
length from the level of berms – 99.0 mnm to the elevation of the support structure
crown of 107 mnm.

171_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 72 Support structure(Source: PZI for rehabilitation of landfill landslide and stabilization of part of the Vinča
landfill, Book 1 – Hidrozavod DTD, 2018)
Given the fact that the width of the support structure is 80 m at its base, design documentation
provides for the cascading formation of the foundation ground. The foundation ground is
performed in phases, following the phases of the construction of the support structure.
The support structure is made from coherent material (silty clay) excavated from the earthmaterial borrow pit. The borrow pit is located within the boundaries of the landfill complex in
Vinča, on the northern slopes area near the support structure.
The excavation of the material on the borrow pit begins with the removal of the 30 cm humus
layer. After the completion of excavation works, this material is returned and distributed overthe surface. Excavation on the borrow pit is planned at a depth of up to 2.5 m.
Humus or soil with poor bearing capacity and other materials that could in time change theirmechanical and physical properties due to biochemical processes may not be placed on theembankment.
Covering of the Support Structure
As the insulation of the inner surfaces of the support structure and drainage trench, the projectenvisages insulating in accordance with the rules for sanitary landfills. As a layer ofhydrogeological barrier, the use of the geosynthetic clay liners (GCL) is planned so as toimprove the existing soil (2.3 × 10-8 m/s) and the compacted material of the embankment (1.3
× 10-10 m/s) in order to achieve the required layer of 50 cm water permeability coefficient c<1 × 10-9 m/s.
The geosynthetic clay liners should have the following minimum characteristics:- Water permeability coefficient: c ≤ 1,2 × 10-11 m/s (ASTM D 5887-04)- Layer thickness at pressures of 2 KPa: 6.5 mm (EN ISO 9863-1)- Penetrating force: 1.8 KN (ISO 12236)

172_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________As the second layer of insulation, a high density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane of 2.0
mm thickness is planned.
The characteristics of the HDPE geomembrane required by this design are:- Density: 0.94 g/cm3 (ISO 1183, ASTM D 1505)- Strength at break: 30 N/mm2 (EN ISO 527-3)- Elongation at break: 800% (EN ISO 527-3)- Penetration resistance: 5.5 KN (EN ISO 12 236)
- Water absorption: <0.04% (ISO 1269)

The geomembrane is placed on a prepared layer with a 200 g/m2 polypropylene (PP) geotextile
surface mass placed for easier installation of the the geomembrane.
On the outer slope of the supporting structure, the use of anti-erosion geosynthetic material
EROSMAT TYPE 3/20Z500M is planned. This material is placed exclusively on the slopes,
over a layer of humus and it is anchored in anchor trenches at the top and the bottom of theslope.
Hydrotechnical Installations
Hydrotechnical installations in the support structure zone at the Vinča landfill have thefunction to provide drainage of the leachate waters through the support structure and theirevacuation to the leachate treatment plant (LTP).
The design documentation envisages the construction of a collector network for the collectionof leachate waters and of facilities for the installation of equipment and for the maintenance ofthe pipeline (Source: PZI for rehabilitation of landfill landslide and stabilization of part of the
Vinča landfill, Book 3 – Design of hydrotechnical installations Hidrozavod DTD, 2018).
Leachate Waters Collector Network
The collector network for the leachate waters collection is distributed in the drainage trench at
the bottom of the inner part of the foot of the barrier. The function of the collector is todischarge leachate from the landfill mass to the LTP plant.
The collector network consists of the following elements:- Drainage trench on the inside of the support structure;- Discharge pipelines;- Discharge structure.
Drainage Trench

The drainage trench function is to collect the leachate waters from the back of the supporting
structure and to direct them towards the discharge pipelines. Two lateral pipelines are planned
within the drainage trench - a 199.28 m drainage pipeline and a 205.04 m long drainage
pipeline. For the lateral drainage pipelines, the design foresees a perforated HDPE pipe
DN315mm SDR11.
173_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The drainage trench is filled with granulated pebbles, with granulation of 16-32 mm, which isinstalled through the pipeline and the geosynthetic layer on the bottom.
In the zone of the inner slope of the supporting structure, a geosynthetic material POZIDRAIN
735, which enables efficient surface drainage, is envisaged as a drainage material.
Discharge Pipelines
The design envisages the construction of the main discharge pipelines and lateral discharge
pipelines. The main drainage pipelines are provided in the lowest part of the drainage trenchand consist of two HDPE pipes DN500mm SDR11. These two pipes have sufficient capacity toallow the evacuation of the drainage water outside the support structure. The slope of the main
drainage pipeline is 3.5%.
The lateral drainage pipes have a function to allow local overflow of leachate waters. The
design foresees a lateral pipeline on the north side, with an inclination of 3.1% and a lateralpipeline on the south side, with an inclination of 2.5%. The lateral pipelines are connected tothe main pipelines in the gate chamber shaft.
Discharge Structure
The discharge structure is located next to the existing bed of the Ošljan stream and the leachatewaters flow through into the bed until the leachate treatment plant is built. The untreatedleachate waters will be discharged into the Ošljanski potok until the completion of constructionof the lagoons for the leachate waters on the Lower Platform (6 to 8 months), after which a trial
test of the leachate water treatment plant will start. Ošljanki potok is also a recipient of treatedwastewater.
The discharge structure is monolithic reinforced concrete buried construction, with dimensions
in the base of 2.4×1.65 m. The foundation slab is 25 cm thick. The walls of the discharge
structure are 1.20 m in height and 25 cm thick.
The discharge structure is based on a 5 cm thick layer of lean concrete, and a 10 cm thickbuffer layer of gravel with natural granulation.

174_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 73 Discharge structure(Source: PZI for rehabilitation of landfill landslide and stabilization of part of the Vinča
landfill, Book 3 Hidrozavod DTD, 2018)
Structures at the collector network
Gate chamber shaft
Within the gate chamber shaft, the connection of the lateral pipelines to the main collector is
carried out and the flow regulation equipment is installed.

Figure 74 Gate chamber shaft

175_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Control Shaft
The control shaft has the function of both the flow regulator and the maintenance of thepipeline. For the needs of the flushing of the pipeline, on each discharge pipeline, the access
was made in the form of a blind flange, and hondling space is provided.

Figure 75 Control shaft
Pipelines Flushing Shaft
The pipelines flushing shaft is provided with access points for the flushing of pipelines at theends of the pipeline in the form of a blind flange.

Figure 76 Pipelines Flushing Shaft
Connection Shaft
176_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The function of the connection shaft is to connect the future pipeline for lateral drainage of theleachate waters from the landfill. The connection is provided in the form of a blind flange on apipe of 315 mm in diameter. The shaft is defined in the design documentation as made fromHDPE material because it is located on the inside of the supporting structure. The shaft iscylindrical in shape, 120 cm in diameter and 170 cm high.
Directing Atmospheric Waters
The collection of atmospheric waters falling to the outer slopes of the support structure is
carried out over a channel network from concrete prefabricated channels with trapezoidal
cross-section. One line of concrete channels is installed on the outer berm of the support
structure and the other in the outer foot of the supporting structure. The total length of thechannel is 328.0 m.
The width of the bottom of the concrete channels is 26 cm and the depth is 20 cm. The
thickness of the wall is 5 cm. The channels are placed on a gravel base.
On the external berm, it is necessary to achieve minimal inclinations of the bottom of thechannel of 0.4% to the sides. The channel network gravitates to the lowest points of the valley,
towards the bed of the Ošljanski potok.
Service Road
For the purpose of inspection and access to the facilities within the drainage system, it isenvisaged to build a service road through the crown of a supporting structure. The service roadwidth is 3.5 m. A traffic road with a surface of crushed stone is foreseen. The thickness of thesurface is 25 cm, and two layers are foreseen, the lower layer with granulation of 31.5-63 mm
is 15 cm thick, and the upper layer with granulation of 0-31.5 mm is 15 cm thick.
The service road consists of a road through the crown of the supporting structure and theplanned road, which is actually an extension of the road through a supporting structure in orderto access the shafts for the flushing of the pipeline.
The length of the road over the crown of the supporting structure is 235.9 m and the plannedroad is 69.70 m.
3.1.1. Calculation of slope stability of new, old and inert landfill under static and dynamic
conditions
The calculation of the stability of the landfill slopes (Source: 17048-PGD-02-01.1
Energoprojekt Niskogradnja) comes to determining the safety factor as the ratio between theshear strength of the soil and the average shear stress along the assumed sliding surfaces.
The conditions that give the minimum factors for the safety of slopes of the landfill are
relevant for the calculation. The calculated minimum safety factors must be greater than thepermitted safety factors which according to the JUS Regulation. U.C5.020, 1980 is as follows:- in static conditions for constant loads:
177_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-o for embankments up to 15 m high, Fs, dop ≥ 1.30;
o for embankments over 15 m high, Fs, dop ≥1.50;
in static conditions for occasional loads:
o for embankments up to 15 m high, Fs, dop ≥ 1.20;
o for embankments over 15 m high, Fs, dop ≥1.30;

For the impact of an earthquake, the criterion is adopted that the minimum safety factors forcritical sliding surfaces must be greater than or equal to:- permissible safety factor Fs, dop = 1.10 for EC-8 earthquake (return period 475 years),- permissible safety factor Fs, dop = 1.00 for earthquake Z2 (return period 1000 years

According to the Rulebook, the minimum required Fs is allowed to be lower than 1.0 if the
maximum movement is within acceptable limits and does not affect the stability andfunctionality of the landfill.
Calculation methods
The stability calculation was performed using the GeoStudio 2007 software package, i.e. its
SLOPE/W tool, which is based on border balance conditions. The calculations in SLOPE/W
were performed using the Morgenstern - Price method for arbitrary sliding surfaces. This
software automatically searches for a critical sliding circle with a minimum safety factor. The
determination of critical sliding surfaces was carried out by the Entry and Exit procedure,
defining two lines representing the areas of inlet and outlet of critical sliding surfaces on theslope of the landfill. Within the boundaries of these lines, several possible sliding surfaces are
specified, while the graphic annexes show optimized sliding surfaces corresponding to theminimum safety factors.
The effect of the earthquake on the slope stability was tested by a pseudo-static analysis, inwhich the earthquake is represented by the acceleration that produces inertial forces. These
forces act in the horizontal and vertical directions at the center of each lamella. In SLOPE/W,
pseudo-static acceleration is entered by the coefficient c, which represents the ratio of pseudostatic acceleration and gravitational acceleration. Pseudostatic acceleration was calculated as cx= 2/3cmax.
The pore pressures in the landfill foundation and in the materials during the construction phaseof the landfill were introduced into the program through the coefficients of pore pressure,which represents the ratio of the weight of the water column and the weight of the soil in thedry state at a certain point.
Results of the slope stability calculation for the new landfill
Selection of material characteristics
The adopted parameters of the shear strength of the material to be incorporated into the body ofthe new landfill as well as of the materials in the landfill foundation are shown in the following
table and in the following figures.
178_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 18 Characteristics of the materials for the landfill and the foundations-New landfill
Mark

MATERIALγ[kN/m3]c’[kN/m2]ϕ’[°]

1

ENVIRONMENT GT2

19

15

21

2

ENVIRONMENT GT4

20

20

20

3

ROCK

21

50

28

4

LANDFILL- Phase III

8.5

0

25

5

LANDFILL-buffer zone

8.5

0

25

6

EMBANKMENT

17

10

20

+255.0
5
1
4
2

6
3

1
2

3

Figure 77 Model of the new landfill – the final construction phase (Phase IV)+245.0
1
4
2

1

6
3

3

2

Figure 78. Model of the new landfill – Phase III of the construction
For the materials from which the embankment was built, as well as for the materials in thelandfill foundation, the shear strength parameters were adopted according to the linear MohrCoulomb fracture law based on laboratory and field tests performed for the purpose ofdesigning all stages of remediation of the old and the construction of the new landfill,presented in detail in the Geotechnical Study. The parameters for the waste material at thelandfill were adopted based on experience in the design of similar facilities and the literature
data.
Adopted Design Criteria
The stability of the slopes of the new landfill (the left and right slope) was tested for several
different sliding surfaces. At the end of this chapter, only the characteristic sliding surfaces forwhich minimum safety factors are obtained are presented.

179_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________For sliding surfaces for which minimal safety factors are obtained under static conditions, astability analysis in seismic conditions was performed using a quasi-static method.
In dynamic conditions, earthquakes according to EC-8 as well as earthquake Z2 of the return
period of 1000 years were adopted as the relevant conditions.
Table 19 Maximum and pseudostatic accelerations from the earthquake –the new landfill
Pseudostatic acceleration
Tr(year) Tso(s) Maximum acceleration
ah(g)
av(g)
ah(g)
av(g)
EC-08 475
0.25
0.125
0.031
0.083
0.021
Z2
1000
0.43
0.147
0.035
0.098
0.023
The calculation of the slope stability of the new landfill was carried out for the final phase of
the landfill construction as well as for phases I, II and III of the landfill construction.
Calculation results - final phase of landfill construction
The stability calculations for the final phase of the landfill were made at the characteristic
cross-section 22.
The following tables present the results of the stability calculations for the last phase of
construction of the landfill for section 22, while graphics are given at the end of this chapter.
Table 20. Section 4 - Safety factors for the final phase of construction of the new landfill
Cross section 4 – Final construction phase
Static condistions – situation before the recultivation
Static condistions – situation after the recultivation
Pseudostatic conditions (EC-08)
Pseudostatic conditions (Z2)

SAFETY FACTORS
Left slope Right lope
1.347
1.565
1.716
1.756
1.298
1.318
1.242
1.260

Fs,dop
1.30
1.50
1.10
1.00

Final phase of construction of the new landfill
This chapter presents graphics for the calculation of the slope stability of the new landfill forthe final phase of the landfill construction, for two options: before recultivation and after
recultivation.

Table 21 Material characteristics of the new landfill and foundation up to the final elevation
Mark

MATERIALγ[kN/m3]c’[kN/m2]ϕ’[°]

ru*/ru**[-]1

ENVIRONMENT GT2

19

15

21

0.15/0.15

3ENVIRONMENT GT4

20

20

20

0.10/0.10

4

ROCK

21

50

28

0.0/0.0180_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
5

LANDFILL- Phase III

8.5

0

25

0.10/0.0

6

LANDFILL-buffer zone

8.5

0

25

0.20/0.0

7

EMBANKMENT

17

10

20

0.10/0.0

ru* and ru** - the pore pressure coefficient before recultivation and after recultivation
The calculations of the slope stability of the new landfill to the final stage before recultivation
are shown in the following figures.

1.347+255.0
5
1
4
2

6
3

1
2

3

Figure 79 Section 4 - Final phase of landfill construction, situation before the recultivation,
static conditions, left slope, Fs=1.347

1.565+255.0
5
1
4
2

6
3

1
2

3

Figure 80 Section 4 - Final phase of landfill construction, situation before the recultivation,
static conditions, right slope, Fs=1.565

1.716+255.0
5
1
4
2

6
3

3

1
2

Figure 81 Section 4 - Final phase of landfill construction, situation after the recultivation,
static conditions, left slope, Fs=1.716
181_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

1.756+255.0
5
1
4
2

6
3

1
2

3

Figure 82 Section 4 - Final phase of landfill construction, situation after the recultivation,
static conditions, right slope, Fs=1.756

1.298+255.0
5
1
4
2

6
3

1
2

3

Figure 83 Section 4 - Final phase of landfill construction, situation after the recultivation,
pseudo static conditions(Z1), left slope, Fs=1.298

1.318+255.0
5
1
4
2

6
3

1
2

3

Figure 84. Section 4 - Final phase of landfill construction, situation after the recultivation,
pseudo static conditions(Z1), right slope, Fs=1.318

1.242+255.0
5
1
4
2

6
3

3

1
2

182
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 85. Section 4 - Final phase of landfill construction, situation after the recultivation,
pseudo static conditions(Z2), left slope, Fs=1.242

1.260+255.0
5
1
4
2

6
3

1
2

3

Figure 86 Section 4 - Final phase of landfill construction, situation after the recultivation,
pseudo static conditions(Z2), right slope, Fs=1.260
Conclusion
Based on the conducted analysis, it can be concluded that the slopes of the new Vinča landfill
in the final phase of the landfill construction are stable for all static and seismic loads, i.e. thatthe minimum safety factors obtained are greater than the permitted safety factors. Based on theforegoing, it can be concluded that the stability and functionality of the new Vinča Landfill
have not been compromised.
Results of the Phase III Budget Calculation
The adopted parameters for the shear strength of the material to be incorporated into the Phase
III landfill body as well as the materials in the landfill foundation are shown in the following
table and in the following figure.
Table 22 Characteristics of landfill and foundation materials
Mark
1
2
3
4
6

MATERIAL
ENVIRONMENTGT2ENVIRONMENTGT4ROCKLANDFILL- PhaseIII
EMBANKMENT

ru*/ ru**γ[kN/m3]c’[kN/m2]

ϕ’
[°]

19

15

21

20

20

20

21

50

28

0.0/0.0

8.5

0

25

0.20/0.10

17

10

20

0.10/0.05[-]
0.15/0.15
0.10/0.10* Note: ru * - pore pressures after construction, and before recultivation, ru ** - values of porepressures after partial recultivation of phase III of the landfill construction, i.e. after covering
the temporary slopes of the landfill with a clay layer 0.5m thick.

183_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The following table shows the results of the stability calculation for the Phase III of the landfill
construction at cross-section 22, while graphics are given in the figures at the end of thischapter.
Table 23. Results of the stability calculation- New landfill Phase III of construction
Final phase of the landfill
Static conditions-before the partial recultivation
Static conditions-after the partial recultivation
Pseudostatici conditions (EC-08) Z1

SAFETY FACTORS
Left slope Right slope
1.356
1.380
1.598
1.568
1.166
1.174

Fs,dop
1.3
1.5
1.0

1.356
+245.0
1
4
2

1

6
3

2

3

Figure 87 Phase III of construction - Static conditions-before recultivation, left slope,Fs=1.356

1.380+245.0
1
4
2

1

6
3

2

3

Figure 88 Phase III of construction - Static conditions-before recultivation, right slope,Fs=1.380

1.598+245.0
1
4
2

6
3

3

1
2

Figure 89 Phase III of construction - Static conditions-before partial recultivation, left slope,Fs=1.598

184_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

1.568+245.0
1
4
2

1

6
3

2

3

Figure 90. Phase III of construction - Static conditions-before partial recultivation, right slope,Fs=1.568

1.166+245.0
1
4
2

6
3

1
2

3

Figure 91. Phase III of construction – Pseudo-static conditions (EC-08), left slope, Fs=1.166

1.174+245.0
1
4
2

1

6
3

3

2

Figure 92. Phase III of construction – Pseudo-static conditions (EC-08), right slope ,Fs=1.174
Conclusion
Based on the conducted analyzes, it can be concluded that the slope of phase III of constructionof the new Vinča landfill is stable for all static loads as well as for seismic loads Z1, i.e. thatthe minimum safety factors obtained are higher than the permitted safety factors. Based on theabove, it can be concluded that the stability and functionality of Phase III of the construction of
the new Vinča Landfill have not been compromised.
Results of Calculation for Phase I and Phase II of the New Landfill Construction
Temporary slopes at 1:2.7 in the Phase I and Phase II of landfill construction were calculated atcross sections VP8 and 22, respectively. The adopted shear strength parameters of the material
are shown in the following table and figure.
185_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 24. Characteristics of landfill materials and foundations for Phase I and Phase II oflandfill construction
Mark

MATERIAL
ENVIRONMENTGT2ENVIRONMENT
GT4

1
2

γ
[kN/m3]c’[kN/m2]

ϕ’
[°]

ru*

19

15

21

0.15/0.15

20

20

20

0.10

3

ROCK

21

50

28

0.0

4

LANDFILL- Phase I

8.5

5**

25

0.20

6

EMBANKMENT

17

10

20

0.10

Note: * ru - pore pressure coefficient after construction Phase I and Phase II of a new landfill** In Table 26, Characteristics of the foundation material, higher shear strength parameters forunprocessed waste have been adopted, as it will not completely degrade and reduce its
mechanical properties during these phases.

+210.01

4
2
3
Figure 93 Section VP8: Model – landfill construction Phase I+245.0

1
4
2

1

6
3

2

3

Figure 94 Section 22: Model – landfill construction Phase II
The following table shows the results of the stability calculations for Phase I and Phase II of
the landfill construction, while graphs are given in the figures at the end of this chapter.
Table 25. Stability calculation results - New landfill Phase I and Phase II of construction
Final landfill phase
Phase I - Static conditions-before recultivation
Phase II - Static conditions- after recultivation

SAFETY FACTORS
Temporary slope
1.416
1.365

Fs,dop1.3
1.3

186_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

1.416+210.01

4
2
3

Figure 95 Phase I of the landfill construction - Static conditions, before recultivation, rightslope, sFs=1.416

1.365+245.0

1
4
2

1

6
3

2

3

Figure 96 Phase II of the landfill construction - Static conditions, before recultivation, rightslope, Fs=1.365
Conclusion
Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that the slopes of Phase I and Phase II of the new
Vinča Landfill are stable for all static loads, ie that the minimum safety factors obtained are
higher than the permitted safety factors. Based on the foregoing, it can be concluded that thestability and functionality of Phase I and II of the construction of the new Vinča Landfill havenot been compromised.
Results of the excavation calculation for the new landfill
The excavation stability calculation was performed at cross-section 22. The adopted shear
strength parameters of the material are shown in the following table and figure.
Table 26. Characteristics of foundation materials
Mark
1
3

MATERIAL
ENVIRONMENTGT2ENVIRONMENT
GT4γ[kN/m3]c’[kN/m2]

ϕ’
[°]

ru
[-]

19

15

21

0.15

20

20

20

0.10

187
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
203

1

192.6

3

Figure 97. Model – New landfill excavation
The following table shows the results of the excavation stability calculation for a new landfill
at section 22, while graphics are given in the following figures.
Table 27. Results of the stability calculation - New landfill excavation
Final phase of the landfill
Static conditions of the partial recultivation
Pseudostatic conditions (EC-08) Z1

SAFETY FACTORS

Fs,dop

1.469
1.185

1.3
1.0

1.469
203

1

192.6

3

Figure 98 New landfill excavation – Section 22, Static conditions, Fs=1.469

1.185
203

1

192.6

3

Figure 99 New landfill excavation – Section 22, Pseudostatic conditions (EC-08), Fs=1.185
Results of inert landfill slope stability calculations
The inert landfill slope stability calculation was carried out at the intersection of the maximum
height.
188_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The adopted shear strength parameters of the material to be incorporated into the landfill bodyas well as the material in the landfill foundation are shown in the following table and figure.
Table 28. Material characteristics of INERT landfill and foundationγ[kN/m3]
19
20
21
19.5
17

MATERIAL
12345ENVIRONMENT GT2ENVIRONMENT GT4
ROCKCONSTRUCTION WASTEEMBANKMENT

ϕ’
[°]
21
20
28
30
20

c’
[kN/m2]
15
20
50
0
10

ru
[-]
0.15
0.10
0
0.1

2.7

4

1

5
1
2
3
Figure 100. Model of the inert landfill – final phase (critical section with maximum height)
For the materials used for the construction of the body of the landfill , as well as for thematerials in the landfill foundation, the shear strength parameters were adopted according to
the linear Mohr-Coulomb fracture law based on laboratory and field tests carried out for the
purpose of designing all stages of remediation of the old and the construction of the newlandfill are presented in detail in the Geotechnical study.
The adopted design criteria
The stability of the slopes of the landfill (left and right slopes) was tested for several different
sliding surfaces. At the end of this chapter, only the characteristic sliding surfaces for which
minimum safety factors are obtained are presented.
For sliding surfaces for which minimal safety factors are obtained under static conditions, astability analysis in seismic conditions was performed using a quasi-static method.
Under dynamic conditions, earthquakes according to EC-8 as well as earthquake Z2 of the
return period of 1000 years were adopted as the relevant conditions.
Table 29. Maximum and pseudo static accelerations from earthquakes - Inert landfill.
Tr(year)
EC-08
Z2

475
1000

Tso(s)
0.25
0.43

Maximum acceleration
ah(g)
0.125
0.147

av(g)
0.031
0.035

Pseudo static acceleration
ah(g)
0.083
0.098

av(g)
0.021
0.023

189
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The following tables present the results of calculations for stability of the inert landfill in the
cross section of the maximum height, and graphics are given at the end of this chapter.
Table 30. Safety factors for inert landfills
SAFETY FACTORS

Burden conditions
Static conditions
Pseudo static conditions (EC-08)
Pseudo static conditions (Z2)

1.511
1.201
1.156

Fs,dop
1.50
1.10
1.00

1.511
2.7

4

1

5
1
2
3
Figure 101 Safety factor in static conditions, Fs=1.511

1.201
2.7

4

1

5
1
2
3
Figure 102 Safety factor in pseudo static conditions (Z1), Fs=1.201

190_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

1.156
2.7

4

1

5
1
2
3
Figure 103 Safety factor in pseudo static conditions (Z2), Fs=1.156
Conclusion
Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that the slopes of the Inert landfill at the Vinča
landfill are stable for all static and seismic loads, i.e. that the minimum safety factors obtained
are higher than the permitted safety factors. Based on the above, it can be concluded that thestability and functionality of the Inert landfill at the Vinča landfill is not compromised.
Calculation of stability of landfill cover layers
The following is a calculation of the stability of the landfill cover layers with the design
parameters:- max. slope 1: 2.7,
- max. slope length 60 m,- the internal friction angle of the earth cover layer 26o,- internal friction angle of the covering layer (clay mineral or geosynthetic) 25o,
The parameters used to calculate the tensile forces in various GSS geosynthetics are the shear
angles at the material contacts.

The calculation of the cover layers was made for the steepest slopes of the landfill (V: H = 1:
2.7)

191
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 104. Force analysis in the cover layer of slopes - GSS Sealing System (Koerner)
The shear angles between the two materials allow the calculation of the shear stresses along theconsidered contacts:

u - contact pore pressure, (u = 0)
The forces considered in the GSC represent the following:- The force parallel to the slope is Wsinβ, where W represents the weight of the cover layer andβ is the slope.
- The forces that can cause tensile forces in geosynthetics are as follows:- F1-F2 = tensile force in geocomposite drainage layer
where- F1 = Ntan δps / Gkomp- F2 = Ntan δps / Gkomp- δps / Gcomp - internal friction angle along the contact of the layer over the geocomposite andthe geocomposite- δGkom / GM - internal friction angle along the contact of geocomposite and low permeability
clay mineral layer
If F1> F2 is equivalent to δps / Gkomp> δGkom / GM and corresponds to the case of lower
contact resistance above the geocomposite, no tension within this layer will occur.
If the angle does not provide stability of the cover layers, anchors and / or supports should be
used.
The preliminary calculation for the adopted internal friction angles at the material contacts isshown in the following tables:
Table 31. Tensile forces in geocomposite
192_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Geotextile
height of the overlayer
length of slope
width in the longitudinal direction
weightslope 1: 2.7
slope 1: 2.7
tangential force
normal force
friction angle of overlayer andgeocomposite
friction angle geocomposite/clay layer
friction of the overlayer -geocomposite
friction geocomposite-protective layer
slide safety -geocomposite coefficienttension in geocomposite

mark
h
l
W
tan β
β
T
N
δps/Gkomp
δGkom/GM
F1
F2
F1/T
F1-F2

dim.
m
m
m
kN
°
kN
kN
°
°
kN
kN
kN

value
0.5
60
1
600
0.371
18.433189.717569.21626
25
292.64279.785
1.542512.855193_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________For the assumed geosynthetic layer and material parameters, a safety factor >1.30 (required
minimum) was obtained.
It is necessary to prove the stability of geosynthetic products on the slopes of the landfill before
performing the works.
The manufacturer of geosynthetics should demonstrate that the minimum safety factor forinternal plane stability is satisfied, as this may cause the slope to fall for a particular geosynthetic
product and particular materials that cover the geosynthetic material or in their base.
Fs,dop ≥1.3.

3.1.2. Regulating and Landscaping
Landscaping
The Vinča communal waste landfill area and its immediate surroundings is an area of damaged
and almost completely destroyed autochthonous and anthropogenic (agricultural) spatial units.
The land where forming the protective green belt is envisaged is for the most part covered with
autochthonous vegetation, while only one part is used for agriculture. In the northern andnorth-east part of the complex nearer to the Danube bank, the land is influenced by highground waters and on the eastern side the area is covered by forest.
By the landscape design (Source: IDP Book 9, Landscape Design – Protective Green Belt,
Landscaping, Fence, Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019), it is foreseen to form aprotective green belt from various shrubs and tree species along the fence of the complex, on
the inner side in the width of 20m, except to the right from the entrance in the length of 630m,
in the width of 10m due to technical conditions.
The belt will consist of good quality shrub and woody species which are naturally alreadylocated in the area where the green belt will be formed. In other areas and as an addition,
deciduous and coniferous species will be planted, species that are resilient and fulfill therequirements of green belt efficiency throughout the year.
Provided by the design solution, the protective belt will fulfill the sanitary, hygienic anddecorative function and upon the forming of thick vegetation it will prevent further
endangering of the environment (wider area) by gasses, dust and potential light landfill waste
dispersing.
In addition, this type of greenery will be incorporated into the system of newly formed green
landfill areas and surrounding forests and as such it will affect its entity, functionality andaesthetics.
Within the KP6-4 construction unit, on the entrance-control platform, the forming of a green
area by free shaping is envisaged, with the use of trees, shrubs and grass covers.
194_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

According to this design solution, the biological recultivation of the new landfill envisages
grassing of areas which in the process of technical recultivation, in accordance with the
dynamics of the use of the provided area.
The Protective Green Belt
This area includes natural habitats with woody and shrub vegetation, with mosaic distributonof grass areas.
A list of plant species (bioecological basis) that are located in the green belt area was made (listof species is displayed in detail in the subject Landscape design).
The existing groups of shrub vegetation are mainly kept, by selection of the best quality
specimens, except in parts where the percentage of Indigo bush amorpha and Old Man's Beard
is high and such areas need to be cleared in order to prevent the expansion of invasive species.
Tree groups along the planned green belt route are of satisfactory vitality and decorative
character and will be kept. An exception are forests in the eastern part of the complex where
there are great damages (uncontrolled cutting down of trees, damage from wind and snow) andheavy attacks of insects and diseases, so their removal is recommended. "Trees with this stateof health cannot perform the intended functions of a buffer zone and cannot prevent the spreadof infection and disease, it is recommended that all vegetation in the eastern part be removed."(Source: IDP Book 9, Landscape Design – Protective Green Belt, Landscaping, Fence,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019).
The positive effect of the green belt will be obvious at the distance of 20-30 heights of theplanned greenery. The alignment of trees and shrubs in the green belt is formed so as tointegrate into the natural environment in the best possible way.
Apart from its basic functions for protection and integration into the surrounding landscapewhich the green belt (Type A) needs to fulfill, on certain sections the green belt (Type B)
should also fulfill the function of a vegetative barrier in order to prevent the spreading of andreduce pollution from dust near particular emitters. In the south-west part, green belt (Type C),
besides serving as a vegetative barrier for dust, also has the function of protecting the spacefrom dispersing plastic bags and similar waste.
Type A green belt envisages the forming of a 20 m wide belt which has a protective function
and serves as a visual barrier that will help the vegetation integrate into the surrounding
landscape. This type of belt is formed from a double tree strip in the middle and shrub strips oneach side by planting seedlings in an alignment which imitates the natural environment at themutual distance between the trees of 4m and the mutual distance between the shrubs of 1.5m.
The number of woody species envisaged on one Are of surface is 7 pieces, and of shrub
species it is 25 pieces. In order for the belt to function throughout the year, 30% of plants
forming the green belt are envisaged to be evergreen.
The Type B green belt envisages the forming of a 20 m wide belt which serves to reduce dust
pollution. At places where the area does not allow a 20 m wide belt (in the southern part by the195_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

CDW platform) forming of a 10 m wide belt is envisaged. This type of belt implies thickplanting of coniferous and deciduous tree species and the belt is formed from a triple tree strip
in the middle and shrub strips on each side by planting seedlings in an alignment which
imitates the natural environment at the mutual distance between trees of 3 m and the mutual
distance between shrubs of 1.2m.
Forming of 20m wide Type C green belt is envisaged in the same way. Beside other things, its
function is also to protect from dispersing plastic bags and similar waste, therefore the design
should envisage placing of a net along the belt which would serve as an additional barrier forthe dispersing of mentioned waste. The number of trees envisaged on one acre is 11, and thenumber of shrubs per acre is 35.
In order for the belt to function throughout the year, 30% of plants forming the green belt areenvisaged to be evergreen.

All types of belts have a conical cross section because that shape best mitigates the windcurrents. Coniferous trees and evergreen shrub seedlings should have an uninterrupted
continuity along the full length of the belt in order to form a barrier during winter months whenother species have lost their leaves and have reduced protective function.
For forming of the green belt, apart from the seedlings on the green belt route and the plantsthat will be kept, planting of new seedlings will be carried out to the required number of
seedlings for achieving the envisaged thickness of the belt. Deciduous tree seedlings ofminimum height of 2-3m will be used, depending on the type and coniferous trees of minimum
height of 1m. Shrub species which will be planted should have well developed and branchedfoliage with multiple shoots. In addition to the autochthonous tree species, planting of
allochthonous species is also planned. Considering there are no autochthonous evergreen
species in the Belgrade area, evergreen and some introduced deciduous species are selectedthat correspond to the requirements that the green belt has to fulfil and to the conditions of thehabitat and anthropogenic influence.
Alternating tree and shrub species along the belt provides more diverse colouring and surpasses
the monotonous appearance of the entire green belt.
The coniferous and deciduous tree species and evergreen and deciduous shrubs are planned forforming of the green belt, according to the table:
Table 32 Specification of planting material predicted for planting in the green belt
(Source: Excerpt from Table 7, Landscape Design - Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May,
2019)
No.

1

SpeciesNumber ofplantsTREES, coniferous species
Pinus nigra Arn.
Total coniferous trees
TREES, deciduous species

2644
2644

196
_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

9
10
11

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Tilia cordata Mill.
Quercus cerris L.
Quercus frainetto Ten.
Fraxinus excelsior L.
Acer campestre L.
Salix alba L.
Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn
Total deciduous trees
SHRUBS, coniferous species
Mahonia aquifolium (Pursh) Nutt.
Prunus laurocerasus L.
Pyracantha coccinea M. Roem.
Total coniferous shrubs
SHRUBS, deciduous species
Spiraea x vanhouttei (Briot.) Zbl
Forsythia x intermedia Zab.
Symphoricarpos albus (L.) S. F. Blake
Corylus avellana L
Sambucus nigra L.
Crataegus monogyna (Jacq.)
Crataegus laevigata (Poiret) DC.
Cornus sanguinea L.
Rosa rugosa Thunb.
Total deciduous shrubs

1427
1427
1427
855
570
77
77
5860
3177
2887
2887
8951
2580
2580
2000
2000
759
620
620
620
620
12399

A 1-2 m wide space will be formed between the fence of the complex and the plants in theprotection zone, which will be grassed to allow access to the fence from the space of thecomplex.
Landscaping of the Entrance-Control Zone
The entrance-control zone is a space consisting of five green spaces, with a total area of
4,237.0 m2 (T1 - 505.0 m2; T2 - 374.0 m2; T3 - 410.0 m2; T4 - 452.0 m2 and T5 - 2,496.0 m2).
Plants on the plots intended for the formation of greenery and lawns have been selected anddesigned to play the aesthetic and sanitary function at the entrance area with their habitus,
color and layout throughout the year. In addition to that, care was taken to ensure that thegreenery does not interfere with visibility in the busiest traffic area, as well as to separate theentrance area from the surrounding functional facilities on the complex. The grass surface isintended to be formed by sowing a seed mixture of grass species resistant to the climaticconditions, which are at the same time resistant to walking. The sowing standard is 35 g/m2.
Table 33. Varieties of grasses and their percentage share in the mix
Participation in the
Grass varietymix (%)
Festuca rubra L.
50197_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Poa pratensis L.
Lolium perenne L.
Agrostis alba Roth.

30
15
5

Biological recultivation of new landfills
Landfill recultivation is a complex process of engineering, land reclamation, agro-technical andother works aimed at the same goal - restoring the reproductive capacity of damaged land andcreating organized "cultural" landscapes. The most delicate, from the stages of restoration ofdamaged land, is biological recultivation. This process of recultivation of new landfills
involves the establishment of lawns with the application of appropriate technologicalprocedures, after the end of their exploitation life. The biological recultivation processenvisages the forming of meadow-type lawns on a total area of 286,784.0 m2.
A mixture of grass seeds and legumes is used to grow meadow-type lawns, which will suit the
purpose of the green area, but also the general climatic conditions and maintenance intensity,
which are characterized by tolerance to relatively unfavorable microclimate and edaphic
conditions. The sowing standard is 30g/m2.
Tabela 34. Varieties of grasses and their percentage share in the mix
Participation in the
Grass varietymix (%)
Lolium perenne L. - English ryegrass
20
Festuca arundinacea Schreb. - Tall fescue
50
Poa pratensis L. - Kentucky Bluegrass
10
Lotus corniculatus L. - Birdsfoot trefoil
20
The given mix is resilient to high summer temperatures, dry conditions and low wintertemperatures.
The Complex Protective Fence
The entire Vinča landfill complex is surrounded by a 2.20 m high fence. The total length of thefence is 6,416.0 m. Concrete columns and fence with galvanized wire mesh with Ø2/40 eyelets
are envisaged. In this way, the complex is protected from the uncontrolled entrance of vehicles,
people, large animals, etc.

198_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 105. Layout of the landcaping(Source: IDP Book 9. Landscape Design – Protective Green Belt, Landscaping, Fence,
Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering, May, 2019)199_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

3.1.3. OVERVIEW OF THE REQUIRED TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF
ENERGY AND ENERGY SOURCES, WATER AND RAW MATERIALSElectric Power
Based on the technical terms and conditions, issued by EPS Distribucija (No. 350-1971/17)
dated May 15, 2018, on the needs of making a detailed Regulation Plan for the sanitary landfill
in Vinča, the municipality of Grocka, for the needs of supplying technological consumers
within the framework of the Vinča landfill complex, it is necessary to build a new substation
TS 35/10 kV, transformer power of 8 MVA.
The temporary connection of the new (connected) TS 35/10 kV within the landfill Vinča will
be to the free 35 kV cell in the existing TS 35/10 kV "Vinča". The permanent connection of the
new TS 35/10 kV within the landfill Vinča will be in the future TS 110/35 kV "Grocka", after
its construction and integration into the 35 kV network. For technological units at the landfill
complex, the supply of the following consumers is planned at the 10 kV voltage level:- Construction and demolition waste (CDW) platform, P ins t/P jed =0.65/0.52 MW- Operative platform, New landfill, P ins t/P jed =0.7/0.45 MW- Leachate treatment plant (LTP), P ins t/P jed =2.2/1.9 MWPower supply of technological units of the CDW platform, Operating platforms, New landfill
and the LTP plant, as well as other consumers covered by this Conceptual Design is foreseenfrom the planned transformer stations TS1, TS2 and TS3 of the transmission ratio 10/0.4 kV,
respectively. For the supply of TS1, TS2 and TS3 transformer stations, two 10 kV lines areforeseen, one for TS1 and another for TS2 and TS3.
Water supply
The amount of water that PUC Belgrade Water Supply and Sewage can provide for themunicipal waste landfill complex in Vinča is 24 l/s (refilling at nights, 10:00 PM – 06:00 AM).
A supply pipeline PEHD Ø200mm is planned. In front of the entrance to the landfill, a newwater supply shaft is planned.
At the entrance to the complex, a water-meter shaft with a combined industrial water meter formeasuring the flow of FP and sanitary water is envisaged. This water-meter measures total
water consumption for the needs of the EfW Plant and the New Landfill.
The water supply network on the CDW platform is connected to the water supply and sewage
system of the landfill complex, located in the immediate vicinity of the platform. The total
estimated water consumption for sanitary purposes is 0.47 l/s.
The network of industrial (technological) water is connected to the external distribution of theindustrial water of the complex. The estimate is that 0.2l/s of industrial water for the CDW
plant is needed. The water consumption for sanitary needs at the LTP plant is 5 m3/h.
200_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

3.1.4. Review on the types and quantities of released gases, water, and other liquid andgaseous waste materials, observed by technological units and the technology of theirtreatment
1. Entrance-Control Zone
The vehicle washing water in the complex entrance zone is supplied by the DN100 mm
pipeline from the atmospheric water lagoon located on the Upper platform. Washing water isdischarged to a separator located on the CDW platform.
The newly designed system for atmospheric water discharge from the landfill complex
entrance implies linear grates and pipes that specifically collect clean atmospheric water andoily atmospheric water. All water collected at the entrance zone are led in a channel to a
separator on the CDW platform. This channel also collects surface water from the slopes to the
CDW platform.
Oil separator with precipitator that is located on the CDW crusher unit has the capacity of 130
l/s.
The atmospheric water collected in the part from the channel for washing vehicle wheels to theroundabout, together with the water from the roundabout enters the perimeter channel along
the New 4 and 5.
The oily atmospheric water comes from washing truck wheels. Washing channels are locatedbefore the weightbridge at the exit from the landfill complex.
All collected oily atmospheric waters are taken to the oil separator with a precipitator locatedon the CDW plant platform. The separator capacity is 150 l/s.
A sewer network made of PVC sewage pipes DN 160 and DN 200 for collectors that collectfecal waste water from these platforms and facilities is planned.
Fecal sewage from the inlets of the landfill entrance enters the axis of the New 1 road andcontinues to collect wastewater from the EfW plant platform and the construction site along the
New 5 road over the roundabout. Then the fecal sewage passes the edge of the New 4 roadwhere it collects the fecal sewage from the CDW platform. After passing the CDW platform,
the fecal sewage system continues along the route along the New 4 road to the Operating
Platform where all fecal sewage is collected. The total amount of fecal water from the complex
is 4.82 l/s.
After collecting of all fecal waters, they are taken to the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP),
or to the package unit - Fecal Wastewater Treatment Plant located within the Operative
Platform. The device has a capacity of 100 PE. The effluent of purified water is carried out inthe peripheral rain channel, which leads these waters to the lagoon on the Lower platform.
2. The CDW Plant Platform
201_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The fecal sewerage network from the facilities on the CDW platform, with the expectedamount of 0.56 l/s, is connected to the external fecal sewerage network of the Vinča complex.
After dedusting, waste water is collected from the concrete plateau into channels with grates
that flow directly into the precipitator. From the precipitators, wastewater is directed to an oilywater separator. These channels collect and lead the rainwater that falls on the plateau.
The expected amount of technological wastewater from the dredger system is 0.2 l/s, but forthe dimensioning of the system for the collection of these wastewaters, the amount of
atmospheric water that flows into it has been adopted. The expected amount of oily stormwater
is 63.8 l/s.
The oily surface waters from the plateau are collected and led to the oil separator with theprecipitator. The flow through the separator is 150 l/s. After the separator, the processed wateris drawn to the periferal stormwater channels.
3. New Landfill
At the very beginning of 2022, there will be a sudden leap in the production of landfill gas witha maximum peak of 2,390 m3/h. After that, there is a sharp dip in production, so that around2025, the production will stabilize with constant growth until 2050, when it will be 2,070 m3/h.
After this period, a logarithmic dip is expected by 2056, when the production is expected to be
300 m3/h, when in 2090, the production will be reduced to a minimum gravitating to zero.
The collected landfill gas flow is lower than the theoretical production. It is expected that in the
period 2020-2053, the flow of collected landfill gas will range from 300-1,400 m3/h, with anaverage value of about 1,000 m3/h.
The Biogas Collection and Evacuation System collects the landfill gas and leads it to thefacility for the use of landfill gas - BEP. In the event of a standstill or overhaul of the BEP
plant, the landfill gas is directed to the Torch System (two torches are planned).
The first torch has a capacity of 550-2,300 Nm3/h, while the other torch has a capacity of 3001,200 Nm3/h. The total expected gas flow together for the "old" and the new landfill is about
2,560 Nm3/h with 50% CH 4 .
Table 2 Characteristics of landfill gas torchesType

Gas flow,
Maximum heat power,
Combustion
Nm3/h, 50% CH 4
kWtemperature, oC

Time, sBG 2000

550-2300

16000

1000

>3

BG 1000

300-1200

6000

1000

>3

The leachate waters from the New Landfill are all those waters that pass through the body ofthe landfill i.e., through the deposited waste to the most downstream part of the landfill. Due tohigh level of pollution, their collection, removal and purification at the LTP plant is envisaged.
Maximal daily leachate water flow is Q f = 0.99 l/s ≈ 1.0 l/s.
202_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________For the surface, completely "open" first phase, without waste, the amount of atmospheric waterthat will reach the drainage system is Q = 20.14 l/s, which was adopted as the baseline amountof water for dimensioning the drainage systems - drainage pipes.
The volume of the lagoons (on the Upper Platform), which only accepts the leachate watersfrom the New Landfill, for a maximum quantity of 1.0 l/s, respecting the condition of the PE“Srbijavode” that it is necessary to provide retention for 20 consecutive calendar days for rainof continuous duration t = 24 hours of return period T = 25 years, a total lagoon volume of V =1.728 m3 is obtained. Two pools of 2 x 2,000 m3 capacity are adopted. One is foreseen forleachate waters from the temporary landfill and the landfill for untreated waste and the other isfor the residues after waste treatment at an EfW plant.
Main peripheral canals traced around the newly designed landfill and secondary concrete ducts
are foreseen for the evacuation of atmospheric water from the body of the landfill after
construction,.

The main peripheral channels also serve for the atmospheric water discharge that can flowfrom the outer slopes into the active phase of the landfill in the excavation and exploitation
phase of the landfill.

Secondary concrete channels collect atmospheric water from the covered landfill surface andlead them to the main peripheral channels.

The lagoon for atmospheric waters (on the Upper Platform) with a volume of 4,000 m3 isenvisaged for the reception of rain water with addition of 177.67 l/s,.
4. Operative Platform
It is envisaged that the hydraulic installations of the Operative Platform are connected to theexternal hydraulic installations of the entire landfill complex, located in the immediate vicinityof the platform itself.
The fecal sewerage from the complex, as well as from the facilities on the Operative Platform(around 200 employees), is pumped into a fecal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), which ispart of the Operative Platform. WWTP has a capacity of 100 PE. The purified water isdischared into a peripheral stormwater channel which drain them away from the boundaries of
the complex.
Conditionally clean stormwater from the roofs of the buildings freely flows into the field andgreenery around the buildings.
203_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Oily stormwater from the Operative Platform (parking lots, vehicle washing, fuel pumpstation) are collected and taken to the oily water separator with precipitator. The separator
capacity is 70 l/s. After treatment, this water is also discharged into the peripheral rain channel.
Water balance on the Operative platform:- Total estimated water consumption for sanitary purposes is 1.10 l/s.
-

Total forecast water consumption for vehicle washing is 1.10 l/s.

-

Expected quantity of fecal wastewater is 1.1 l/s.

-

Expected quantity of oily stormwater is 68.8 l/s.

-

Total forecast water consumption for fire hydrant network is 10 l/s.

-

Expected quantity of technical waste water from vehicle washing is 1.10 l/s.

5. Upper Platform
The quantity of atmospheric waters that come in the lagoon on the Upper Platform is 177.67 l/swith the adopted volume of 4,000 m3. This volume is sufficient in the case of multiple hours
retention without draining the water from the pool. The pool is of trapezoidal shape in withdimensions in the base of 54.5 m x 8 m, water depth 4.5 m, slope inclination 1: 1.5. From thislagoon, it is planned to transfer the atmospheric water by a Ø 140 pressure pipeline and pumpinto the tank chamber for the purpose of fire protection of the facilities at the landfill as well as
for washing the wheels of vehicles in the control zone.
The system for draining the leachate from the new landfill is according to the type of waste thatis being disposed, divided into two parts:- The system for collecting the leachate from the temporary landfill of municipal
waste and part for the Untreated Waste Landfill (Untreated Waste I and II)- The system for collecting the leachate from the Landfill for residues from waste
treatment at the EfW plant (Residues I and II)
Two pools are designed on the Upper Platform for the intake of leachate, with a capacity of
2,000 m3 (total capacity 4,000 m3.). The pools are trapezoidal in dimension in the lower base28.5 x 6 m, water depth 4,5 m, slope inclination 1: 1.5.
The leachate is evacuated from the distribution shaft for leachate waters at the Upper Platform,
by gravitation with a pipeline to the leachate waters lagoon on the Lower platform (where theleachate treatment plant - LTP is planned).
6. Lower Platform
The amount of atmospheric waters that flow in the lagoon on the Lower platform is 171.47 l/swith the accepted volume of the lagoon of 3.700 m3. This volume is sufficient in the case of204_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

multiple hours retention without draining the water from the pool. From the lagoon, thecollected atmospheric water flows into the Ošljanski potok by gravitation with a pipeline. A
meter for measuring the quantity of discharged water is planned on this pipeline, and the meteris to be connected to a probe for automatic monitoring of the water level in the lagoon.
Three pools/lagoons, with a total capacity of 13,800 m3, are designed to receive the leachatewaters on the Lower Platform (two pools with a capacity of 2 x 5,100 m3 and one pool with acapacity of 3,600 m3).
The pools (5,100m3 in volume) have dimensions: 9.30 x 65 m in the bases, 61m long, the pool
(3,600m3 in volume) has dimensions: 7.0 x 52m, water depth max. 4.5 m. The slope of thesides of the pool is 1: 1.5.
A pool with the capacity of 3,600 m3 will serve to mix water from the other two pools(capacity 5,100 m3). From this pool, through the pumps, the leachate water will be delivered to
the leachate water treatment plant (LTP). One pool with the capacity of 5,100 m3, accepts theleachate water from the “old” landfill, and the other pool with the capacity of 5,100 m3, accepts
the leachate water from the leachate waters lagoon on the Upper Platform (leachate water fromthe New landfill).
After the end of the operation of the “old” landfill and its recultivation and after the filtration of
the leachate water through the “old” landfill, the leachate water will be re-pumped into thelagoon on the Upper Platform.
Leachate Treatment Zone (LTP Plant)
The quantities of leachate waters to be collected and treated are given in the table.
Table 36 Amount of leachate waters generated at the landfill
Year
2020
Collected leachate water
96,000(m3/year)
Lachate water
for the0
EfW, (m3/ year)
Treated leachate water
90,000(m3/ year)

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

91,90092,00082,50041,800

8,600

3,300

2,400

6,000

12,00012,00012,000

8,600

3,300

2,400

90,00081,90070,50029,800000In accordance with the production of leachate waters and its production needs for biogas in the
EfW plant, the leachate treatment plant is dimensioned to 90,000 m3/year with a reserve ofabout 20%, that is, the capacity of the plant is 13 m3/h.
The amount of leachate waters shown in the table represents the sum of the process waterproduced at the existing and new landfill. The quantification of leachate quantities for EfW
represents the annual leachate waters consumption for the APCR process (instead of raw
water/city water, the leachate water is used to stabilize the APCR). Therefore, the LTP plant
processes excess leachate water that will not be reused in the APCR curing process.

205_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The leachate water treatment plant will only operate for five years, after which all the processwater will be transported to the EfW plant (not a subject of this project).
Overview of atmospheric and wastewater quantities
Atmospheric waters
The relevant rainfall intensity is determined from the calculation of the short duration rainfall
intensity (ITP curve) for the Belgrade Meteorological Station, which is attached below.
"According to the conditions of PE Srbijavode No. 325-05-00418/2019-07, Belgrade, April 3,
2019, for the sizing of atmospheric channels, the value of rain intensity for a return period of
T=25 years, for a period of 24 hours, was adopted and it is 0.056 mm/min or 9.33 l/s/ha.
The total surface from which atmospheric water is collected is approximately 230 ha.
The flow is then Q = Ψ*I*P, where:
For return period T=25 years and rain duration tk=24 h:- Rain intensity I = 0.056 mm/min = 9.33 l/s/ha- Ψ, runoff coefficient of 0.1 (green areas) to 0.9 (concrete)- P, Water catchment area"

206_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 106. ITP curves for the Meteorological Station Belgrade
Wastewater
Atmospheric water is collected by an atmospheric sewer system.
Newly designed channels can be divided into the peripheral channels of the landfill complex
that collect water from catchment areas outside the landfill complex, as well as atmosphericwater from the catchment areas around the perimeter of the complex (but not from the landfillbody) and the peripheral channels around the body of old and new landfills that collect theatmospheric water from the landfill body.
On those areas where atmospheric water pollution may occur, it is anticipated that it will becollected and discharged to oil separators before discharging into channels (water from roads,
as well as atmospheric water from platforms (EfW, CDW and LOP)).

207_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Atmospheric water collected by the peripheral channels around the body of the old and new
landfill is discharged into lagoons for atmospheric (clean) water. The project envisages two
lagoons for atmospheric water. The first, with volume of 4,000 m3, is located on the Upper
Platform at an elevation of 160.00 m, while the second lagoon is on the Lower Platform,
downstream of the old landfill at an elevation of 90.00 m and has a volume of 3,700 m3.
Atmospheric water coming from the catchment areas outside the landfill complex is discharged
directly into the recipient - Ošljanski potok, and further into the Danube.

The total quantities of the atmospheric sewage are given in the Table below:
Type of atmosphericsewageChannels
sewageforatmospheric

Quantity dischareged to
Osljanski potok

External (riparian
wastewater)

O1, O2247 l/sInternal wastewater

Right and left peripheral channel
around the new landfill, rightand left peripheral channel
around the old landfill, channels
S1 to S5, New 4 - Separator S1,
New 5 - Separator S2.

350 l/s

208_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

3.2. OVERVIEW OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE PLANNED AND DESIGNEDSOLUTIONS WITH THE REFERENCE BAT DOCUMENTThe European Commission has not produced a BREF reference document for the best available
techniques for landfills, but the Landfill Directive (COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 1999/31 / EC of
26 April 1999) has established certain technical standards for landfills.
Where the Landfill Directive does not provide relevant technical requirements, the generalprinciples of the IPPC Directive, including BAT, must be applied.
BAT is not applicable for activities such as landfill design, as best practice is applied during
the construction of a new phase or a cell. BAT will be applied to landfill activities that arecontinuous and where continuous progress can be achieved over time. This includes theoperation of the plant, which is not only related to the landfill body, but to activities such ase.g. landfill gas and leachate water management.
The Regulation on the waste landfilling (Official Gazette of RS, No. 92/2010) was used foranalysis, as well as the document Guidance for the Landfill Sector / Technical Requirements of
the Landfill Directive and Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC S5.02); UK
Environment Agency, which defines measures to meet the relevant legal and technicalrequirements for the IPPC landfills. The Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on Best Available
Techniques for the Waste Sector: Landfill Activities, Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 was also used.

209_______________________________________________________________________________________EIA STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Tehnološki proces
Podaci o BAT zahtevima utvrđenim referentnim i drugim relevantnim dokumentima za proces rada sanitarne deponije u Vinči iusaglašenosti procesa sa ovim zahtevima prikazani su u narednoj tabeli:

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

General requirements

1

2

Ensuring adequate financial security forenvironmental protection obligations (bothforeseen and unforeseen), including closure
and post-closure control

Landfill design in accordance with theLandfill Directive and the Landfill
Regulation:
2.1 control of water flows- leachate from the landfill, processwastewater and precipitation water must be
separately collected and discharged separately
to the wastewater treatment plant or theappropriate recipient
2.2 leachate water management- Sufficient number of shafts (stable andground-based) must be built to maintain and

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (5. BAT for
Landfill Activities/5.2 Primary
requirements/5.3 Environmental
Liabilities)
Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (5.2 Primary
requirements)

Yes

Yes

Regulation on the waste landfilling(Official Gazette of RS, No.
92/2010), Article 6; Annex 2, Item
1. 1), 2) and 3) (conditions for the

In the procedure for obtaining the Waste
Management Permit from the competent
ministry, within the Waste Disposal
Facility Operation Plan, it is the
responsibility of the project developer tosubmit a Contract and an insurance policy
for damage caused to third parties and to
the environment, in accordance with the
Law on Waste Management (Official
Gazette of RS, No. 14/2016).
2.1 Separate leachate water collection
from landfill, process wastewater andstormwater has been designed and will be
constructed in accordance with the design.
All waters will be led in a controlled way
to a wastewater treatment plant or
recipient, in accordance with theconditions of the competent authority,
legislation and BAT recommendations.
2.2 The project envisages an adequate
number of shafts and other parts of thesystem for controlled leachate waters

210_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

inspect the leachate water collecting drainage
pipes.
- a temporary collection shaft (resistant tochemicalinfluences,
securedagainstexplosion and odors) must be installed for
temporary retention of the leachate watercollected from the landfill body
2.3 adequate system of protective layers
2.4 adequate overlay
2.5 adequate measures for the prevention andmanagement of landfill gas

3

Establishment and implementation of an
Environmental
Management
System(EMS)

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

landfill body)
Rulebook on Methodology for
Designing Remediation Projects(Official Gazette of RS, No.
74/2015)

Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02),
April
2007
(3.1
Management techniques)
Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (5.2 Primary
requirements)

Yes

Comment

disposal.
2.3 The design of the protective layer
system was carried out in accordance withthe requirements defined in theRegulation.
2.4 The design envisages the constructionof an overlay system in accordance with
the Regulation.
2.5 The project envisages controlledcollection, removal and treatment oflandfill gas.
The EMS system will be established as amanagement system throughout the Vinča
project complex (landfills, EfW and BEP
facilities with associated facilities) andwill contain, inter alia, the following
elements:- management and reporting structure- a plan of general and specificenvironmental objectives- Annual Environmental Report- Landfill environmental management
program- documentation management system- Proceduresfor
implementing
corrective measures- training and awareness program- internal and external communication
program211_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment-

4

5

Quantities of biodegradable waste that canbe landfilled:
1) in the period from 2012 to 2016 - at least
25% of the total amount (by weight) of
biodegradable municipal waste2) in the period from 2017 to 2019 - at least
50% of the total amount (by weight) of
biodegradable municipal waste3) in the period from 2020 to 2026 - at least
65% of the total amount (by weight) of
biodegradable municipal waste

Application of the Waste AcceptanceCriteria (WAC) and Waste Acceptance
Procedures (WAP) for receiving waste inaccordance with Annex II of the Landfill
Directive and Council Decision 2003/33 /EC

Regulation on the waste landfilling(Official Gazette of RS, No.
92/2010), Article 10

Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (1.7 Key Issues
for the Landfill Sector)

waste acceptance procedure
a waste management system that
includes all incoming waste and waste
on the site

Yes, partly

The plan for reducing the amount of
biodegradable waste that is landfilled is an
obligation of the City of Belgrade and it ispart of a special project implemented incooperation with PE Zelenilo.

Yes

Applying the appropriate measures isnecessary to ensure that only waste isdisposed of in landfills that is inaccordance with the national and the EU
regulations / recommendations, the design
parameters and conditions prescribed by
the relevant waste management permits
and to ensure the following:- implementation of defined measuresfor documenting waste coming to thesite- clear criteria for receiving waste:- the waste to be received must have aproper description, coding andRegulation on the waste landfilling(Official Gazette of RS, No.
92/2010), Articles 11-22
Law on Waste Management(Official Gazette of RS, Nos.

212_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

36/2009, 88/2010, 14/2016 i
95/2018), articles 29, 30, 43, 75,
76 - on reporting

6

Implementation of basic security measures
to prevent unauthorized entry andconditions for the handling service
platforms

Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02),
April
2007
(3.
Management/ 3.5 security)

Commentclassification
the received waste has undergone
appropriate treatment (if necessary)- there are certain limits for the types
and composition of waste that is
acceptable- clear measures for the treatment ofwaste that cannot be received on site.
- The acceptance of landfill waste will
be defined by the plant's Operation
Plan and guidance on criteria andprocedures for accepting or not
accepting landfill waste in accordancewith Annex II of the Waste Directive
2003/33/EC.
The entire sanitary landfill complex will
be surrounded by a wire fence to preventthe spread of waste, as well as to preventthe unauthorized and uncontrolled entry ofhumans and animals into the site.
At the entrance to the landfill complex, agate with a ramp is planned.
Within the control zone there is asupervision station (three prefabricatedhouses, two connected and one separate),
which includes a doorman, control panels,
vehicle control system and video
surveillance controls, office space,kitchenette and toilets and communal
areas for drivers .
-YesRegulation on the waste landfilling(Official Gazette of RS, No.
92/2010), Article 6; Annex 2, item
2. (conditions for the handlingservice platform)

213_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

A radioactivity detection system withalarm and appropriate software will be
installed at the entrance to the incoming
truck weighbridge.

7

8

9

Conditions for roads and necessary
infrastructure
7.1 width of access road 6m, maximum slope
14%
7.2 sufficient quantity of drinking water andprocess water to wash the container vehicles,etc.
7.3 facilities and installations for consumer
electric power supply, for external lighting,lightning protection, fire and explosion alarm
installation, TT and internet networks

Procedure for closing down a landfill andmaintaining and controlling a closed
landfill

Application of the waste management
hierarchy as a priority in waste prevention
and management:- prevention,- preparation for reuse, recycling,- other reuse operations (re-utilization
for the purpose of obtaining energy,

Regulation on the waste landfilling(Official Gazette of RS, No.
92/2010), Article 6; Annex 2, item
5. (conditions for roads and therequired infrastructure)

Yes

Regulation on the waste landfilling(Official Gazette of RS, No.
92/2010), articles 24-25

Yes

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (4.1.1 Overview
of Waste Landfill Activity)Yes

7.1 Yes
7.2 Yes
7.3 YesA landfill closure plan and themaintenance and control of a closed
landfill will be developed. The project
defines the technical solution and thecover layers, in accordance with theRegulation.
Prevention of generating waste in the Cityof Belgrade is carried out throughactivities defined at the national level andis reflected, first of all, through theimplementation of the principles ofcleaner production, circular economy,
defining by-products and termination of214_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents-etc.),
waste disposal

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)Law on Waste Management(Official Gazette of RS, Nos.
36/2009, 88/2010, 14/2016 i
95/2018)

Comment

waste status, and more. Effort has been put
in raising the awareness of the population
about the importance of prevention forover 10 years.
Preparation for reuse and recycling begins
with a relatively well organized primary
selection system operating in the city ofBelgrade. Primary selected secondary raw
materials that are collected through a wide
network of provided and placed collection
containers in the city of Belgrade.
The primary selected secondary raw
materials are taken to the existing
municipal waste collection centers where
secondary separation is carried out on theseparation line (Ada Huja, New Belgrade).
By Decision of the Mayor of Belgrade no.
501-4180/16-G from 06/17/2016, thelocations for establishing new waste
collection centers - recycling centers andtransfer stations - were determined. The
City of Belgrade budget for 2019envisages the procurement of equipment
and equipping of two more recycling
centers with a separation line and othernecessary equipment.
Recycling centers also collect special
types of waste in accordance with theLaw.
The budget for 2019 also envisages the215_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

procurement of additional containers forthe separate municipal waste collection
system (paper, plastic, metal, glass, mixed
municipal waste), additional undergroundcontainers, numerous machinery andvehicles for waste collection andcollection of sorted secondary raw
materials, abrol containers, baling presses
with a capacity of 100 t, with the aim ofupgrading the existing system andexpanding the coverage of the territory
with a waste collection service.
Supply contracts are signed by the
suppliers and PUC "Čistoća".
The project for construction of a newlandfill and other facilities envisages theinstallation of a construction waste
treatment line.
Other re-utilization operations (reutilization for energy purposes, etc.). The
landfill in question is being constructed ata site where an existing landfill is alreadylocated, where the entire amount of mixed
collected municipal waste is deposited.
Instead of such a solution, this project
includes a modern plant for the utilizationof energy from waste, as well as a plant
for the utilization of landfill gas from thebody of the existing and new mixed

216_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

municipal waste landfill.
Disposal of mixed municipal waste in theCity of Belgrade in the future will only be
carried out for the amount remaining after
primary and secondary waste selection,
reuse and treatment at construction waste
treatment plants, energy waste utilizationand landfill gas utilization, as well as after
separation of green waste from themaintenance of green areas and the fellingof trees performed by PE Zelenilo in
special locations.
Use of resources/energy consumption and applied technology

9

Energy Efficiency
9.1 monitoring energy consumption andkeeping records
9.2 implementation of energy efficiency
measures during plant operation andmaintenance
9.3 annual energy analysis to identify
opportunities for identifying the opportunities
fir optimizing energy supply (use of generated
landfill gas to produce heat / electricity) and
optimizing/reducing energy consumption

Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (3.4 Energy)
Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (4.3.2 Techniques
for Prevention and Minimisationof Resource Consupmtion/ 4.3.2.1
Use of Energy)

Yes

Energy consumption is represented in thefollowing activities:- heating, lighting and electricity
supply of plant facilities- supply of electricity for vehicle
washing equipment, scales, pumps,
video surveillance, signaling, etc.
- fuel to power the vehicle- operation of lagoon pumps- operation of degassing system- operation of the wastewater
treatment system- operation of the construction waste
treatment system
9.1 Yes217_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

9.2 Yes
9.3 Yes10

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,/Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (4.3.2 Techniques
for Prevention and Minimisationof Resource Consupmtion /4.3.2.1
Use of Energy)

Energy usage

Yes

In accordance with the requirements of the
Waste Directive and the Waste Disposal
Regulation,
theproject
fortheconstruction of a new landfill envisages
the installation of a biothorn network, theseparation and energy utilization oflandfill gas from the body of both the newand the existing municipal landfill.

Yes

Only non-recyclable waste will bedisposed on the landfill (secondary raw
materials) in primary and secondary
selection processes (when disposed of incontainers in the city and after separationof raw materials on separation lines atseveral locations in the city), reused forother purposes or that did not go forrecycling treatment or treatment at theEfW facility.
Green biodegradable waste from publicareas of the City of Belgrade is removed

Regulation on the waste landfilling(Official Gazette of RS, No.
92/2010), Article 6; Annex 2, item
1. 4) (conditions for the landfill
body)

11

Use of waste as raw material

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,/Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (4.3.2 Techniques
for Prevention and Minimisationof Resource Consupmtion/ 4.3.3.1
Waste as the Raw Material)

218_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

and treated at another location.
Construction materials from demolition
will be treated in a construction waste
treatment system and used to cover the
terrain.
Excavation land will be used to build
other parts of the complex's terrain as
needed.
Landfill gas released in the landfill bodywill be used to generate energy.

12

Use of waste as alternative fuelAir emissions
Preventing
emissions
from
waste
decomposition by applying best landfill gas
management practices and appropriate
control techniques:
13 13.1 reducing the possibility of landfill gas
generation by appropriate pre-treatment ofwaste prior to admission to the landfill
13.2 collection and removal of landfill gas bygas well system and pipeline network

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,/Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (4.3.2 Techniques
for Prevention and Minimisationof Resource Consupmtion/ 4.3.3.1
Waste as the Raw Material)
Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (5. BAT for
Landfill Activities/5.5 Emissions
to Air/Techniques for Prevention
andMinimisationofYes

The use of waste as an alternative fuel ispart of the Vinča project and only nonEfW waste will be disposed of at thelandfill.

Yes

13.1 Yes, partly. Prior to the admission ofa large amount of green waste generated in
the process of maintaining green areas andpruning trees in the city of Belgrade to thelandfill, the waste is separated and treatedat a specially designated location of JP
Zelenilo.
13.2 Yes. The project envisages acomplete system for the disposal and219_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

13.3 managing condensate from landfill gas in
the gas network
13.4 regular monitoring and regulation of gas
wells

14

15

Recommended landfill gas emission limits(diffuse air emissions): methane - 1% v / v
or 20% of the lower explosive limit; VOC(surface emissions):≥50 ppmv on average above the surface
with a final overlay≥100 ppmv direct reading in open areas
within the landfill area≥500 ppmv in surrounding facilities;
carbon dioxide (CO2) - 1.5 v / v;
total sediment matter 240 - 350 mg / m2/day

Burning of landfill gas on a torch with aminimum temperature of 1000 °C and aretention time of 0.3 seconds, if it is notpossible to use landfill gas for energy
production

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Emissions/4.4.5 Management ofLandfill Gas)

treatment of landfill gas, as described in
the text of this study.
13.3 Yes. The project envisages acomplete system for the disposal andtreatment of landfill gas, as described in
the text of this study.
13.4 Yes.

Regulation on the waste landfilling(Official Gazette of RS, No.
92/2010)

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (6.3 BAT
Emission
Levelsfor
Air
Emissions/6.3.1
Fugitive
Air
Emissions)Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,/Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (4.3.2 Techniques
for Prevention and Minimisationof Resource Consupmtion /4.3.2.1
Use of Energy)

Comment

Not applicablecurrently

Yes

Regulation on the waste landfilling

The recommended limit values will betaken into account in the monitoringprocess and the limit values defined by thelegislation of the Republic of Serbia will
be applied.

The use of landfill gas for the productionof energy under defined conditions isforeseen.
The operation of the torch system is alsoplanned, which starts in the event of:- if the gas flow is higher than the set
value, or the pressure value is higher
than the set value,- if the gas engines at the cogeneration
plant (BEP) are out of operation, with
the BEP plant control system

220_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)(Official Gazette of RS, No.
92/2010) Article 6; Annex 2, item
1. 4) (conditions for the landfill
body)

16

17

Recommended NOX emission limit values:
16.1 from the gas-burning torch are 150
mg/m3
16.2 from the gas extraction plant is 500
mg/m3.

Dust and fine particulate matter
reduction using the following control
techniques:17.1 Waste emitting dust must be pretreated with water or a "wetting agent", orsuch waste may only be accepted in sacs
17.2 All waste containing asbestos must betreated as "hazardous waste" and disposedof in a separate cell in limited quantities.
17.3 compacting waste immediately after
unloading from a delivery vehicle andcovering it with appropriate material(natural or artificial cover)Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (5. BAT for
Landfill Activities/5.5 Emissions
to Air/Techniques for Prevention
andMinimisationofEmissions/4.4.5 Management ofLandfill Gas)
Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (4.4.6 Techniques
for Prevention and Minimisationof
Air
Emissions/4.4.6.1
Dust/Fine Particulates (PM 10 and
PM 2,5 )Comment

including torch operation.
The project envisages the burning oflandfill gas on a torch with a minimum
temperature of 1000 °C and a retention
time of 0.3 seconds.

Yes

The recommended emission limit values
have been taken into account in themonitoring procedure and the limit values
defined by the legislation of the Republicof Serbia will be applied.

17.1 Yes, foreseen by the project17.2 Not defined by the project, but it
will be defined by the Plant Operational
Plan.
Yes, partly

Regulation
on
the
waste
landfilling (Official Gazette of

17.3 Yes, foreseen by the project17.4 Yes, foreseen by the project17.5 Yes, foreseen by the project
17.6 Yes, foreseen by the project221_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

17.4 regular dusting of roads on site(cleaning and spraying)
17.5 avoiding disposal of waste in adverse
weather conditions
17.6 formation of vegetation buffer zone
17.7 Covering vehicles / containers theenter and leave the site

18

Ensure that odours do not affect thesignificant deterioration of facilities andthe environment beyond the boundariesof the site, using the following
management and control techniques:18.1 define and implement an odour
management plan
18.2 pre-treat waste that produces odours
18.3 apply appropriate procedures forreceiving waste
18.4 reduction of open areas for the rollover of waste (max 25 h 25m, slope 1:3)
18.5 compaction and covering of waste
immediately after unloading
18.6 proper landfill gas management

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

RS, No. 92/2010), Annex 2, item
1. 6) (ocnditions for the landfillbody) and item 6. (conditions forthe protective ventilation belt)

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note
on Best Available Techniques for
the Waste Sector: Landfill
Activities,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,Ireland;December 2011 (4.4.6 Techniques
for Prevention and Minimisationof Air Emissions/4.4.6.2 Odour)Comment

17.7 Yes, foreseen by the project

Yes, partially

There are no facilities in the immediate
vicinity of the site that could besignificantly affected by odours from thesite of the new landfill. The nearest
residential buildings are more than 1 km
away.
18.1 Yes, it is foreseen by the project,primarily through activities of regularcompacting of saturated waste on a daily
basis, covering of waste with inert
material, systematic collection ofleachate and its treatment at thewastewater treatment plant, as well as
collection of landfill gas and its further
treatment at the BEP plant.

18.2 The project does not foresee the pretreatment of waste deposited at thelandfill site.
18.3 Yes, it is foreseen by the project anddefined in detail by the legislation of the
Republic of Serbia.

18.7 aeration of lagoons for accepting
leachate

222_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

18.4 The recommended slope isenvisaged by the project but the size of
the waste disposal cells is larger and is74.0 x 57.0 m. Rollover surfaces are notforeseen by the project.
18.5 Yes, provided by the landfill project
and the landfill operation plan.
18.6 Yes, landfill gas collection andfurther treatment at the BEP plant isforeseen.
18.7 Aeration in lagoons is not foreseen
since water goes for purification to the
LTP plant (mechanical pre-treatment onrotarysievesandsandfilters,
acidification, reverse osmosis, thickening/evaporation of concentrate from reverse
osmosis, final reverse osmosis) and inlagoons no processes of purification are
performed, they only serve as
equalization pools and temporary
acceptance where water is not retained
much.
The leachate collection basin will havean adequate capacity to receive an
average amount of leachate over 20
consecutive calendar days (request by PC
Srbijavode)(IDP,
Volume3.5.
Hydrotechnical Installation Design Upper Platform and Volume 3.6.
Hydrotechnical Installation Design -223_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

Lower Platform).
Reduction of emissions from vehicles onsite using the following management andcontrol techniques:19.1 defined procedures for the
maintenance and efficient operation ofvehicles19.2 defined procedures for checking the19
use of fuel for all vehicles on site (energy
efficiency)
19.3 regular vehicle servicing andmaintenance19.4 engine shutdown when the vehicle is
not in use
19.5 reducing the movement of vehicles on
location
Water emissions

20

Placing temporary coverings on nonworking surfaces and overlay uponcompletion of each cell as soon aspracticable in order to reduce infiltration

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (4.4.6
Techniques for Prevention and
Minimisationof
Air
Emissions/4.4.7.3
VehicleEmissions)

Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (4.2 Landfill
Engineering)
Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (4.4

Yes

19.1 It is envisaged by the project andwill be defined in detail and used in theoperating stage of the plant.
19.2 It is envisaged by the project andwill be defined in detail and used in theoperating stage of the plant.
19.3 Provided for in the project and byenvironmental measures within thisStudy.
19.4 Provided for in the project and byenvironmental measures under this Study.
19.5 Yes. Restriction of vehicle speed on
and off the complex is predicted by thisStudy.

Yes

The landfill project and operation plan
envisage compacting of the spilled waste
and covering it with inert material
immediately after disposal, at least once a
day.

224
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

Yes

The active landfill surface is divided into
three parts: the municipal waste landfill,
the untreated waste landfill and the partfor disposing of residues from the EfWplant. The leachate water system isdivided into two parts according to thetype of waste being deposited:- A system for collecting leachate from a
temporary landfill and part for the
disposal of untreated waste in a later
period;- A system for collecting leachate fromthe part of the landfill where prestabilized residues are deposited after
treatment at the EfW plant.
The collected leachate from both parts isdischarged into the leachate lagoons at
the level of 160.00 m.a.s.l. (Upper
platform) and then gravitationally to thelagoons at the Lower platform at the levelof 90 m.a.s.l. and from there to theleachate treatment plant (LTP). After
treatment, this water can be flowed into
the Ošljanski stream and further into theTechniques for Prevention and
Minimisation of Emissions / 4.4.4
Minimisationof(Potentially
Contaminated)
Storm
Water
Emissions / 5.4.1 BAT for
Discharges to Surface Water)

21

Controlled collection and control of water
discharged into surface water

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (5. BAT
forLandfill
Activities/5.4.1
Discharges to Surface Water)

225_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

Danube.
For evacuation of atmospheric water fromthe body of the landfill after construction,
perimeter canals are planned, routed
around the newly designed landfill. The
perimeter canals also serve to drain
atmospheric water that can flow from theouter catchment areas to the active
landfill phase during the landfill
excavation and exploitation phase.
Oily rainwater from the operational
plateau (parking lots, vehicle washing,fuel station pump) is collected anddischarged to an oily water separator witha settling basin. After treatment, thiswater also flows into the perimeter rain
canal.
The project and this study envisage theinstallation of flow meters (flow meters)
at the places of discharge of water fromthe complex into surface waters - therecipient.

22

The recommended emission values for thequality of wastewater discharged into
surface water are:pH 6 – 9, toxicity 10 TU, BOD5 25 mg/l,
suspended solids 25-35 mg/l, totalammonia 10 mg/l, total nitrogen (sum of
Kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrates and nitrites) 15
mg/l, total phosphorus 2mg/l (depending

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (6. BAT
Associated Emission Levels/6.1
Emission Levels for Discharges to
Surface Water)

Yes

Wastewater quality monitoring will bedefined in detail in the Monitoring Plan,in accordance with legal regulations.

226_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (5. BAT
forLandfill
Activities/5.4.2
Discharges to Sewer)

not applicable

The project does not envisage thedischarge of wastewater into the publicsewer network.

Yes

24.1 The project does not foresee thedischarge of wastewater into groundwater
24.2 The risks of wastewater discharges
into groundwater are minimal as the
project envisages controlled collection,
implementation and treatment from theentire landfill complex.
The bottom of the landfill body and thelateral embankments are covered withprotective watertight layers in accordancewith legislation and good practice, toprevent wastewater from leaking into thesoil and further into groundwater.
Concrete and controlled drainage of waterfrom drainage areas to grease and oil
separators is planned in all manipulationand parking spaces, in accordance withthe project.
Separators/settling basins must be
regularly
maintained/emptied
byauthorized organizations.

on the recipient sensitivity)

23

24

BAT for the discharge of wastewater into
public sewage implies the quality ofeffluent in accordance with the prescribedstandards by the competent authority

The BAT for the discharge of wastewater
into groundwater includes:
24.1 ban on the direct discharge into thegroundwater of effluents containing certain
dangerous substances (List I) and theapplication of strict controls to prevent
indirect emissions of substances from List IIof the Groundwater Directive
24.2 eliminating the risk of groundwater
emissions by applying appropriate control
measures (bundwalls, solid substrates, etc.)24.3 Groundwater monitoring for the early
detection of groundwater pollution

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (5. BAT
forLandfill
Activities/5.4.3
Discharges to Groundwater)

227_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

Due to the occasional large daily rainfall,
it is necessary to control and regularly
maintain the perimeter canals.
- The buried diesel fuel tank must
be double sheathed and in the
bundwall made of watertightreinforced
concrete.
Thebundwall must be of sufficientvolume to accommodate thetotal amount of fuel stored.

25

Leachate control by the application ofrecommended
techniques
forthereduction of generation/discharge ofleachate:
25.1 maintaining the minimum active cellarea (maximum 25x25 m) and slope 1:3
25.2 compaction and daily cover to reduce

Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (4.2.6 Leachate
Management)

Yes

All buried facilities, as well as parts ofburied facilities, must be made ofwaterproof concrete.
According to geological studies, the soilat the site is treated as waterproof, with afiltration coefficient of
Kf = 10–6 ÷ 10 –9 cm/s.
24.3 Groundwater quality monitoring will
be in accordance with the Monitoring
Plan, in accordance with the legal
regulations.
25.1 The recommended slope is foreseenby the project but the size of the waste
disposal cells is much larger and is 74.0 x
57.0 m. Based on these dimensions,lagoons have been designed for receiving
leachate, of adequate capacity.
25.2 Yes, provided by the landfill project

228_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

infiltration and thus the quantity/quality ofleachate
25.3
implementationofappropriate
procedures to prevent damage to the final
covering layer
25.4 recirculation of leachate with theapplicationofthefollowingmeasures/conditions:- existence of an efficient system forcollecting and draining leachate from therespective landfill cells (where sprinkling
irrigation is carried out)
- monitoring of the level and quality leachatein the appropriate cells- existence of a system for collection,
removal and treatment of landfill gas fromthe appropriate cells- the composition of leachate does not disturb
the processes of landfill stabilization

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (5. BAT
forLandfill
Activities/5.4.4
Leachate Effluent)

Comment

and the landfill operation plan.
25.3 Waste disposal at the landfill is doneon a surface, on a previously preparedbase (bottom to top layers):
1. Natural soil.
2. Compact low-permeability GCL clay
lining 50 cm thick or geo-synthetic GCLclay lining made of clay-like material.
The required value of the water
permeability coefficient of this layer is
k x ≤ 1 x 10–9 ms–1;
3. High density polyethylene coating HDPE 2 mm thick;
4. Geotextiles: 1000 g/m2;
5. 50 cm thick layer of gravel fordrainage;
6. Waste;25.4 Leachate from the upper lagoon
collected by the gravity pipeline shall be
carried to the lower lagoon. From thelower lagoon, after mixing the leachatefrom the old and the new landfill, theleachate is transported by floating pumps
are to the leachate treatment plant. The
pumping station near the lower lagoon isintended to transport collected leachate to
the TE-TO Vinča (EfW) plant for theenergy utilization of municipal waste,
after the closure of the leachate treatment
plant (LTP).

229_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

26

Design, construction and operation of
lagoons for storage and treatment ofleachate in a manner that minimizes therisk of leakage. Monitoring system isinstalled to ensure no leakage occurs.

Reference document(title)Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (4.2.6 Leachate
Management)

Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

Yes

Fully envisaged by the project, as
explained in item 24.2, 25.3 and other.
A detailed monitoring plan will beelaborated in the Monitoring Plan.

Yes

Reception of landfill waste will bedefined by the operation plan of the plantand guidance on criteria and procedures
for accepting or not accepting landfill
waste in accordance with Annex II of the
Waste Directive 2003/33/EC.

Yes

Fully envisaged in the project.

Yes

Fully envisaged in the project.

Soil and groundwater
Defined under Water Emissions and Waste
Management sections
Waste management

27

Each shipment of waste must undergo avisual inspection by employees trained to
identify waste that may not be acceptable
and act in accordance with definedprocedures.

28

The work surface must be designed tomeet the measures of protection against
infiltration of atmospheric precipitation,
stability
andsettlement
measures,interference suppression measures, as well
as operational logistics and security.

29

Distribute and compact waste immediately
after unloading onto the work surface.

Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (4.2.13 Waste
handling and treatment)
Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (4.2.13 Waste
handling and treatment)
Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - Technical230_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

30

The recommended waste density after
initial compaction is about 0.8 t/m3, whichis the optimum for biodegradation
processes.

31

The daily cover has the effect ofpreventing the material from blowing up
by the wind, as well as deterring waste
collectors, birds and rodents. The operator
must ensure that waste is covered as soon
as practicable.

32

Risk analysis should identify any wastewith characteristics that require a specificsite handling that does not comply withdaily procedures, such as:- fine particles;- empty containers;- very large objects;- sludges;- waste of intense odour.
Pre-treatment options need to be

Reference document(title)Requirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (4.2.13 Waste
handling and treatment)
Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (4.2.13 Waste
handling and treatment)
Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (4.2.13 Waste
handling and treatment)
Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (4.2.13 Waste
handling and treatment)

Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

Yes

Envisaged by the project.

yes

The landfill project and operation plan
envisage compacting of the spilled waste
and covering it with inert material
immediately after disposal, at least once a
day.

yes

The procedure for obtaining the Waste
Management Permit by the competent
ministry, within the Operation Plan of the
Waste Disposal Facility, defines the types
of waste to be disposed of and theconditions under which these activities
will be performed.

231_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

Environment Agency, Guidance
for the Landfill Sector - TechnicalRequirements of the Landfill
Directive and Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPCS5.02), April 2007 (4.2.13 Waste
handling and treatment)

yes

Waste that cannot be received at thelandfill is not retained at the complex andis returned to the waste supplier.

yes

34.1 The project envisages putting up agreen belt.
34.2 Provided by the design andstandards.
34.3 Envisaged by the project. The CDW
plant only operates in day mode. The
entrance gate to the CDW Plateau isscheduled to be open during the plateau
operation time (8 h/day, 5 days/week)(IDP Volume 7/3 Technology Project crushing plant Plateau).
34.4 Envisaged by the project.

considered.

33

Waste that cannot be received at a landfill
must be temporarily stored in an isolatedarea unless immediately removed by adelivery vehicle.

Noise and other interference

34

Noise reduction by applying the following
control techniques:34.1 raising the buffer zone between the site
and the surrounding area
34.2. where necessary, installing noise
dampers on equipment that produces highnoise
34.3 limiting activities that potentially
produce noise for a specified period during
the day
34.4 regular maintenance of vehicles androads

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (4.4.6
Techniques for Prevention and
Minimisationof
Air
Emissions/4.4.7.2
Vechicle
Emissions)
EPA Guidance Note for Noise in
Relation to Scheduled Activities,
2nd Edition, 2006
Regulation on the disposal ofwaste on landfills (Official Gazetteof RS, no. 92/2010), Article 6;232_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

35

Implementationoftechniquesforpreventing the generation and control ofbulk waste by location:
35.1 pre-treatment and separation of light
recyclable waste fractions before disposal
35.2 waste baling
35.3 use of an appropriate covering
35.4 maintaining the minimum surface of theworking face (max 25 m x 25 m), slope 1:3
35.5 guard rail to prevent waste fromspreading
35.6 daily waste disposal inspection

36

Application of bird control techniques:36.1 pre-treatment of organic/biodegradable
waste
36.2 effective waste covering
36.3 installation of fixed or mobile bird
scarecrows

37

Application of pest and insect control

Reference document(title)Annex 2, Item 1. 5) (conditions forthe landfill body)
Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (4.4.6
Techniques for Prevention and
Minimisationof
Air
Emissions/4.4.7.1 Litter)
Regulation on the disposal ofwaste on landfills (Official Gazetteof RS, no. 92/2010), Article 6;
Annex 2, Item 1. 5) (conditions forthe landfill body)
Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (4.4.6
Techniques for Prevention and
Minimisationof
Air
Emissions/4.4.7.4 Birds)
Regulation on the disposal ofwaste on landfills (Official Gazetteof RS, no. 92/2010), Article 6;
Annex 2, Item 1. 5) (conditions forthe landfill body)
Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on

Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment

yes

35.1 Not provided for in the project.
35.2 Not provided for in the project.
35.3 An adequate cover will be used tocover the waste on a daily basis.
35.4 The recommended slope and size of
the working face are provided for in the
project.
35.5 Yes. The entire landfill complex will
be fenced off to prevent the spread ofwaste, as well as to prevent theunauthorized and uncontrolled entry ofhumans and animals into the site.
35.6 Yes

Yes, partially36.1 Not provided for in the project.
36.2 An adequate cover will be used tocover the waste on a daily basis.
36.3 Not foreseen by the project but
foreseen by protective measures.

Yes, partially37.1 Not provided for in the project.

233_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

techniques:37.1 pre-treatment of organic/biodegradable
waste
37.2 compaction and covering of waste
immediately after unloading into a definedcell37.3 treat affected/exposed areas with
insecticides

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (4.4.6
Techniques for Prevention and
Minimisationof
Air
Emissions/4.4.7.5
Vermin&Insects)

Comment

37.2 An adequate cover will be used tocover the waste on a daily basis.
37.3 Not applicable

Regulation on the disposal ofwaste on landfills (Official Gazetteof RS, no. 92/2010), Article 6;
Annex 2, Item 1. 5) (conditions forthe landfill body)

38

Implementationoftechniquesforcontrolling the spread of mud on roads at
the location:
38.1 regular dusting of access roads
38.2 regular maintenance of access roads
38.3 regular inspection of internal andexternal roads
38.4 use of efficient equipment for wheel
cleaning and vehicle washing

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (4.4.6
Techniques for Prevention and
Minimisationof
Air
Emissions/4.4.7.6 Mud)yes

38.1 Yes
38.2 Yes
38.3 Yes
38.4 Yes

Vibration emission limit values are notapplicable to landfill activities

Final Draft BAT Guidance Note on
Best Available Techniques for the
Waste Sector: Landfill Activities,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Ireland; December 2011 (5. BAT
forLandfill
Activities/5.5.5

-

/

234
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

BAT documents defined by reference
documents

Reference document(title)Compliancewith
Directive /BATrequirement(Yes/No)

Comment-

The assessment of the risk of an accident
willbeexaminedthroughtheaforementioned legal acts.

Vibration)
Law on Disaster Risk Reduction
andEmergency
Management("Official Gazette of RS", No.
87/2018),

There are no established BAT requirements
for accident assessment issues.

Methodology for the developmentof assessment of threat fromnatural disasters and other disasters
and emergency plans and rescueplans ("Official Gazette of RS",No. 18/2017) andRegulation on the content andmethodofpreparationofemergency plans and rescue plans("Official Gazette of RS", No.
8/11).

235_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

4.0. OVERVIEW OF MAIN ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BY
THE PROJECT LEADERThis chapter presents a summary of the assessment of alternative solutions considered in theprocess of the Competitive Dialogue with Bidders and explains the reasons for excluding themfrom further consideration.
The tender documentation for the first round of Competitive Dialogue offered two potential
locations for the EfW plant:

and

-

-

Vinča location, which would offer space for new landfills, EfW and BEP plant
Location of Cerak, where an EfW plant could be built alternatively.

Three possible Concepts of the Design were considered, each with the aim of treating 100% of
municipal waste from the territory of the City of Belgrade, taking into account the above two
locations:•
Option 1:- Construction of a plant for mechanical-biological treatment at the Vinča site,where fuel from waste would be produced;- Transport of waste prepared for incineration to the Cerak site, near the residential
area;- Construction of a new combined heat and power plant (CHP) at the Cerak site,near the existing heating plant that would use waste for its operation;- Transport of combustion residues to the Vinča site where new landfills would bebuilt.
•

Option 2:- Transport of untreated remains from the site in Vinča to the Cerak site;- Transport of combustion residues to the Vinča site where new landfills would bebuilt.
•

Option 3:- Incineration of unprepared municipal waste at the site in Vinča, at the EfW plantthat would be built there;236_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________- Disposal of combustion residues at the new landfill that would be built at the
Vinča site.
In addition to each of the options, the Bidders were allowed to bid equipment for the disposal ofrecyclable or organic materials (sorting, composting, digestion) to further reduce the amount ofmunicipal waste that would be finally treated at treatment facilities within the said options.
In addition, treatment, recycling, storage and disposal of construction waste are contained in eachof the options listed.
The following project parts were considered:•Part 1: Management of the existing landfill by PUC "Gradska čistoća" Belgrade:- Operation of the existing Vinča landfill in the transitional period of the project of
3 years (2016 - end of 2018).
•

Part 2: Measures from the project implemented by the Bidder:- Remediation and closure of the existing Vinča landfill, including landfill gas
treatment plant, energy generation and leachate treatment plant•Part 3: Construction of a new landfill at the Vinča site, comprising:- Temporary landfill- Landfill for combustion of treatment residues, including a facility for thematuration or solidification of these residues- Construction waste recycling plant and inert waste landfill•
Part 4: Construction Phase and Routine Phase for the above three options of theconsidered Concept of the Design and, Option 3, as preliminary the most favourable concept.
The key impacts and risks of the three alternative solutions of the Design and the "no project"situations on the physical, biological and environmental impacts during the construction andoperational phases of the project were assessed. The basis for comparison lies in the effectivenessof the option considered in terms of avoiding and minimizing the environmental and social
impacts of project sites. The analysis and evaluation of the options considered showed that:
Options 1 and 2 have similar disadvantages,-

Option 3 has the most advantages,-

The "no project" option has the most disadvantages.

237_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The Cerak location is disadvantageous due to the many disadvantages, considered Options 1 and2. The location is close to (about 120 m) residential areas which:- makes potential noise, odours and imissions significant,-causes a greater visual impact on the environment,-

carries a greater risk of public complaint.

Additionally, Option 1 requires significantly more transportation effort between the Cerak site
and the Vinča site than other options.
Option 3 shows the most advantages over the other two options. This is mainly due to the fact
that:the facilities are located relatively far from the volatile/residential facilities, in anarea where visual effects are minimal,
the facilities will be located in the immediate vicinity of the existing waste
disposal site.
The "no project" option is unsustainable in the current state. At the Vinča site, there is currently atypical unsanitary landfill that has been formed over more than 40 years of municipal waste
disposal. The consequence of the operation of this landfill is the pollution of the water of the
Ošljanski stream and Ošljanska pond, the pollution of the surrounding agricultural land,
groundwater and air. The landfill is not equipped with technical control systems. No lower
impermeable layer (natural or artificial) was used which resulted in uncontrolled migration ofleachate to the underground. There is no collection and treatment of leachate, so leachate isdischarged to the nearest surface recipient. No sewer system was built at the site.
Currently, septic tanks are also disposed of at the landfill. Landfill gas accumulation is nottechnically controlled and utilized, leading to its complete migration and release into the air. The
presence of many birds, rodents, waste-feeding insects is evident, as is their role in the potential
transmission of infectious diseases beyond the boundaries of the complex. The landfill ispartially fenced, but does not have an adequate and complete vegetation barrier. Waste dispersion
and dispersion of particles into the air are also not controlled. Adequate supply of fire protection
water is not available.
As part of the Competitive Dialogue process, Bidders evaluated different project options. The
results of the dialogue are as follows:
Dialogue result
None of the Bidders
selected the Cerak site aspart of the projectPre-treatment
andproduction of recyclable

EffectOptions 1 and 2 are no longer the subject of interest due to the proximity of theresidential area and the potential impacts of the planned project on the closest
environment.
Prior primary separation of all recyclable components from waste is done prior todisposal of municipal waste into containers (primary selection). In the further

238_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
products were not ofinterest to most Bidders
An estimate of financesand costs resulted in theCity's decision to reduce
the project

development of the project, the option based on direct incineration of waste, Option
3, should be considered.
Option 3 will be modified. This means reducing the planned capacity of the EfWplant to around 65% to build a new landfill for untreated waste.

Source: "Environmental and Social Scoping Study for the Belgrade EfW Project in Serbia,
Amendment to the E&S Scoping Report" Fichtner, April 2017)
In short, the project opted for the location of the existing municipal waste landfill in Vinča withthe concept of direct incineration of municipal waste and landfill gas with the utilization of heatand electricity, as well as the construction of a new landfill for untreated waste, landfill for inert
waste, landfill for EfW residues and rehabilitation of the body of the existing landfill and its final
closure, with the application of modern technological solutions and equipment, and inaccordance with the legislation of the Republic of Serbia, EU directives and guidelines of BAT
reference documents.
Based on the aforementioned, alternatives from the point of view of a suitable location wereconsidered by the Project Leader.
Alternative technological solutions and planned equipment have been considered, primarily interms of meeting the requirements set out in the legislation and guidelines of the EU Directive on
landfill waste disposal.
From the aspect of environmental protection, the project concerned reduces the greenhouse gas
gases, decreases the distribution of waste from the landfill body, reduces the occurrence of birds,
rodents and other animals on the active surface of the landfill body, reduces the risk of infectious
diseases, allows the exploitation of landfill gas for energy purposes, enables the utilization of
non-hazardous construction waste, etc.
From the aspect of safety and health of the population, the project in question has the effect of
reducing the occurrence of infectious diseases originating from the municipal waste landfill,controlling the flow of leachate through the body of the landfill and preventing their entry into
the groundwater and surface waters and their microbiological and chemical contamination.
Dust reduction systems from the landfill, wastewater treatment and landfill gas utilization areforeseen at the plant.
The Leachate Treatment Plant (LTP) as a biological treatment of water was considered as apossible alternative during the development of the project. This solution was not accepted forseveral reasons:• the required layout (bases) of the necessary infrastructure was not compatible withthe available space on the site (especially given the limited space below the supporting239_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

structure)
the commissioning period required to put the biological treatment into operation ismuch longer•

this anticipated type of process would require more experienced professionals forthe process monitoring and more intensive operation monitoring•• fluctuation of certain parameters in the quality of the leachate would require
modifications and adjustments to the design during the working period

the equipment could not be so easily put out of operation once the production oftreated water has declined significantly (as expected after the supply of leachate from theexisting landfill is treated)•

The main benefits of the project are the temporary sanitary disposal of municipal waste until theconstruction of a facility for its energy utilization, the prevention of water and land
contamination with wastewater from the landfill body, the reduction of greenhouse gas, theutilization of construction waste, etc.

5.0. OVERVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE
LOCATION AND THE SURROUNDING AREA
5.1. POPULATION
Around the site of the Vinča landfill there are Belgrade settlements Veliko selo in the north,Slanci and Mirijevo in the northwest, Kaluđerica in the west and Vinča in the south. The closest
settled households in individual settlements are at a distance of about 1700 m. The landfill
complex is not directly visible from the aforementioned settlements and the nearest inhabitedhouseholds. To the east is the Danube River.
Due to the implementation of a comprehensive project for landfill site management in Vinča,
residents of this informal settlement will be physically displaced to free up space for theconstruction of newly designed facilities at the Vinča landfill complex.
The City of Belgrade is aware of the importance of physical and economic relocation, as well as
the expected effects resulting from the implementation of the project.
The City of Belgrade has signed a Public Private Partnership Agreement for municipal waste
treatment and disposal services in Vinča, which includes rehabilitation and remediation of the
Vinča landfill, construction of a waste treatment plant and launching of a new waste management
system in Vinča. In accordance with the Public Private Partnership Agreement, it is theobligation of the City of Belgrade to hand over to the public-private partner a site freed from all
240_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

persons and things for the purpose of bringing the site (land) to the intended purpose establishedby the said planning acts.
Based on the Plan of Resettlement of Households living in the informal settlement at the Vinča
landfill site as well as the re-establishment of the secondary raw materials collector revenue
source at the Vinča Landfill ("Official Gazette of the City of Belgrade”, No. 86/2018), it is theobligation of the City of Belgrade to draw up and implement a plan for the resettlement ofhouseholds living in an informal settlement at the Vinča landfill site and on the land planned forthe construction of public utility infrastructure facilities, as well as a plan to restore the source ofrevenue of secondary raw material collectors at the landfill. The goal of the resettlement plan is
to minimize the adverse effects of the project and re-establish and improve the standard of livingof those affected by the project.
The Action Plan stated:- That members of the working group from the Secretariat for Social Welfare, theSecretariat for Environmental Protection and the Center for Social Work repeatedly went
to the field and visited the site of the Vinča landfill. On 03.12.2014, 15 (fifteen) families
were listed, while on 16.01.2015 14 (fourteen) families were listed at the site of the Vinča
landfill;- On 08.06.2016, the third listing was conducted on the site of the informal
settlement at the site and a survey was conducted on the socio-economic status ofhouseholds living in the informal settlement at the said location by an expert teamcomprising representatives of the Secretariat for Social Welfare and the Center for Social
Work.
- The City Center for Social Work (Department of Planning and Development)
conducted an analysis of the social status of families at the site and verified that they wereon the records of the city Center for Social Work and prepared the Report filed under No.
551-879/7 of 1 August 2016;
As part of the latest survey (8 June 2016), there were 17 families (85 people) whose members
were present in their homes between 2014 and 8 June 2016. Of the total number of respondents, a
total of 41 were registered: 41 men, 44 women, 38 minors (under 18), 47 adults and 6 (six)persons without documentation on the basis of which their age would be determined.
Families mostly have four and five members, which makes 50% of the total number of families.
Five families have six or more members.
All households claim to have permanent residence in the settlement. Out of the total number of
respondents, 9 (nine) persons were listed as "head of household-family" have their last registeredplace of residence in the City of Belgrade, while 8 (eight) of them do not have a registered placeof residence in the City of Belgrade.
241_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________Of 17 (seventeen) families enumerated in the last listing: 12 (twelve) families were found in thesettlement during all three censuses (listings), 3 (three) families were found in two censuses, 2(two) families were found only in the last census.
In the meantime, two persons left their households and formed 2 (two) separate households inseparate barracks.
The length of residence of families in the settlement is shown in the table:
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN THE SETTLEMENT
Number of yearsof residence
No. of families

Up to 3 years

10-20 years

20-30 years

Over 30 years

4

5

6

3

Families were asked to estimate the monthly income of each family member. In addition, they
were asked to indicate the primary and secondary sources of income and the amounts generated
from these sources. Individual amounts were summed and taken as an estimate of the entire
family's income on a monthly basis.
Information on the amount of income is given in the table:
INCOME AMOUNT, in dinars
IncomeNumberfamiliesof

up to 10,000

10,000 - 15,000

Over 15,000

It has not beenstated5

4

3

5

The main sources of family income are: contract with landfill - 25 (twenty-five) tenants, the rightto financial social assistance in Belgrade is exercised by 5 (five) tenants, while the right to social
assistance in the municipality of Šabac is exercised by 4 (four) tenants.
All families live in illegally built barracks without electricity and water. After checking theproperty status and income on a different basis, it was determined that 2 (two) tenants areindebted with the property tax of the taxpayer.
Thirty-one (31) persons have incomplete elementary education, 6 (six) persons have completed
primary education, 2 (two) persons have completed secondary education, 1 (one) has completed
post-secondary education, and 3 (three) are illiterate. Five (5) tenants are still attending school.
The Working Group noted that a total of 9 families (with a total of 37 persons - household
members) having the last reported claim on the territory of the City of Belgrade are entitled toresettlement with appropriate housing support in accordance with the Action Plan and theprovisions of the Law on Housing and the Maintenance of Residential Buildings.

242_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________In addition to the right to resettlement with the appropriate housing support defined in the Action
Plan, all families covered by the project will be entitled to the following forms of assistance
whose implementation will be the responsibility of the City of Belgrade, or the competent City
Administration bodies of the City of Belgrade:-

Assistance in obtaining personal documents
Assistance when enrolling children in school
Assistance in exercising the right to health care
Assistance in employment and re-establishing sources of income
Assistance in exercising the right to social assistance

The Action Plan states that there are currently seven companies present at the landfill, undercontracts with PUC "Gradska čistoća". These companies employ collectors from informal
settlements, (on average 10-15 per company), who extract recyclable waste from the imported
municipal waste in order to reduce the amount of waste to be deposited and to increase recycling
rates.
PUC "Gradska čistoća" undertakes not to increase the number of companies operating in thelandfill in the meantime, as well as the number of employees in the existing companies withwhich it cooperates, and to terminate contracts with the said existing companies 6 months before
taking over the landfill operations by the said private partner, and in cooperation with the City, toadopt a plan for monitoring and restoring the living conditions of the employees of thesecompanies.
The Secretariat for the Environment commits itself to informing PUC “Gradska čistoća” of the
adoption of the Action Plan on the obligations set out in the Action Plan. Following the adoptionof the Action Plan, the City of Belgrade, through the competent secretariats, will continue toregularly inform and consult the families involved in the project about the following activities:- Plan for the placement of families in apartments;- Individual discussions with property owners and agreement on activities that will
be undertaken to assist them;-Presentation and signing of contracts;
Consultative meetings with local communities in which families move;- Date of commencement of the resettlement and planned transportation of families
and their belongings (families will be notified of the exact date of resettlement at least
one week before that date).
In the period from 15 June 2018 to 25 June 2018, representatives of the Secretariat for Social
Work and PUC "Gradska čistoća" held meetings with companies for the collection of secondary
raw materials and informed them of a possible interruption of the collection of raw materials by
2019. Subsequent discussions with the public private partner and review of the implementation
243_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

plan for the various components of the project identified that these activities could continue fortwo more years. This was presented to recycling companies at a meeting held on 13 July 2018.
Neither company owns the facility at the Vinča landfill, so companies use hangars belonging to
PUC "Gradska čistoća". Two companies have mobile equipment for baling collected waste at thelandfill, and one company has a special waste collection vehicle. The Secretariat confirmed thatthe companies have the right to transport the equipment to another location, but the companies
refuse this option. The companies said they had no plans for further work after the landfill closed
and that their revenue would be jeopardized. One of the larger companies at the meeting,estimated that its workload would be reduced by app. 20%.
As stated in the study above, the City of Belgrade is responsible for the resettlement of Romafamilies in order to free up space for the construction of planned facilities, as well as forproviding information and assistance to affected households. The City Assembly formally
adopted the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), which commits the City to meet all legal
requirements, as well as the International Financial Institutions (IFIs) that will participate in thefinancing of the Project.
According to the latest information obtained by the City, the resettlement status is as follows:
All families that meet the requirements of the Law on Housing and Building Maintenance andadequate housing support was provided and are housed in already constructed apartments of theCity of Belgrade in accordance with the Plan of Resettlement of households living in theinformal settlement at the landfill site as well as re-establishing the sources of income of thecollectors of secondary raw materials at the Vinča landfill.
The City of Belgrade provided assistance to individuals who do not have IDs to obtain them.
Persons over the age of 16 have been assisted in obtaining ID cards. Parents were helped toobtain birth certificates for children under 16 years of age.
Prior to the resettlement itself, all children under the age of 14 were enrolled in a preparatory preschool program and primary school, in accordance with compulsory pre-school and primaryeducation defined by positive RS regulations. Class attendance is monitored on a regular basis incollaboration with school principals, teachers and the Secretariat for Education.
After the resettlement, all the medical records of the persons covered by the project weretransferred to the health centers in the new locations. Those who do not have medical records arehelped to apply for and obtain medical records at health centers.
Families are employed by the Vinča landfill as collectors, paying housing costs out of their own
income. Prior to the resettlement, families were informed of the costs of using the apartments, i.e.
households were told that they would have an obligation to pay the rent (if they did not go totheir apartment, i.e. house) and utility costs, but also that the City would use subsidies to help244_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

them cover these costs, and that the City would also help them with drafting personal documents,
enrolling children in school, health care, social protection and finding a job.
The City of Belgrade, the City of Šabac and the Municipality of Vladimirci will assist thepersons involved in the project to re-establish and improve their sources of income through thefollowing measures:-

offering seasonal jobs;-

offering jobs in city utility companies;-

offering jobs through public works programs;- offering jobs in collaboration with the NES (development and implementation ofindividual employment plans, job search training as well as adult training and retraining courses,
job opportunities available, employment mediation, entrepreneurship incentive and development
services, special programs for individuals who are at risk; harder-to-employ groups);- offering employment and self-employment assistance within available programs andprojects of NGOs and other organizations (e.g. EU IPA 2016 EU Support Program for Roma
Inclusion - Empowering Local Communities for Roma Inclusion, funded by the European Unionand implemented by the Permanent Conference of Cities and Municipalities, in cooperation withlocal governments across Serbia);-

offering adult education and craft training courses;- offering jobs during the construction phase of the project, at the Vinča landfill and later
during the operational phase of the new landfill;- offering collection and sorting jobs for secondary raw materials at other locations where
PUC Gradska čistoća operates (e.g. at locations of future recycling centers).

Since the families were resettled from the informal settlement to the Vinča landfill in September
2018, the Working Group has been monitoring the implementation of the Resettlement Plan for
at least two years after resettlement in collaboration with all other organizational units involvedin the implementation of the Resettlement Plan.

5.2. AIR
Air is one of the major environmental factors, whose quality determines the quality of life ofpeople by directly affecting health, but also indirectly affecting all other environmental factors.
Numerous studies have confirmed the rise in mortality and morbidity caused by contaminatedair. Quantifying the impact of polluted air on human health has become one of the key
components (arguments) in stakeholder decision making.
The control of air quality in the territory of Belgrade is performed through a monitoring systemestablished by the national and local network of measuring stations (Source: Belgrade
245_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Environmental Quality for 2016, City Administration, Secretariat for Environmental Protection,2017).
The Air Pollution Measurement Program in Belgrade ensures the achievement of several goals:- monitoring air pollution levels in relation to the limit value (GV), tolerance value(TV), maximum allowable values (MDV) and target values (CV),- taking preventive measures to protect the air from pollution,- informing the public and making recommendations for behavior in increased air
pollution events,- monitoring of concentration trends by zones of the urban territory,- population exposure assessment,- identification of sources of pollution or risk,- evaluation of long-term trends,- considering the impact of the measures taken on the degree of air pollution.
Previously available data
Regular national and local air quality monitoring
With the Regulation on Zone and Agglomeration Designation ("Official Gazette of RS", No.
58/2011 and 98/2012), the territory of Serbia is divided into three zones and eight
agglomerations, for the control, maintenance of conditions and/or improvement of air quality.
The entire territory of Belgrade belongs to the "Belgrade" agglomeration.
Air quality monitoring requirements, including criteria for determining the minimum number ofmeasurement and sampling points in the case of fixed and indicative measurements,
methodologies for measuring and assessing air quality, data requirements and methods forproviding air quality assessment data, as well as volume and content information on air quality
assessment is set out in the Regulation on monitoring conditions and air quality requirements("Official Gazette of RS", No. 11/2010, 75/2010 and 63/13).
In accordance with the Law on Air Protection, the Environmental Protection Agency was
proclaimed the responsible contractor for the establishment and management of an automatic air
quality monitoring system within the national monitoring network, while the Belgrade City
Environmental Secretariat is in charge of controlling the air quality in the local Belgrade city
network.
Belgrade's local network includes 18 measuring stations established to achieve: continuous fixed
measurement of pollutants from stationary sources of air pollution in populated areas (18measuring stations), continuous fixed measurement of pollutants from stationary sources of air
pollution in industrial areas (3 measuring points) and indicative measurements of pollutant levels
from mobile sources of air pollution (15 measuring stations).

246_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The spatial distribution of automatic measuring stations and measuring points in the state andlocal air quality monitoring network on the Belgrade city map is given in the figure.

Figure 107 View of established measuring stations on the territory of RS (Belgrade)(Source: Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA), www.sepa.gov.rs)

247_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The following results were obtained for the City of Belgrade during 2016:
Mean annual sulfur dioxide value above the limit value (50 μg/m3) was notrecorded during 2016, nor was the daily limit value exceeded (125 μg/m3).
-

In 2016, the annual limit value for NO was exceeded in Belgrade 2 of 40 μg/m3 at
Belgrade Stari Grad station, with a mean limit of 45.8 μg/m3. Tolerance annual value of
50 μg/m3 was exceeded at locations Belgrade_Mostar and Belgrade_Despot Stefan.
-- In 2016, most stations reported exceeding the annual limit value of suspended
PM 10 particles (40 μg/m3).
-

In 2016, the exceedance of the annual limit value of suspended PM 2.5 particles of
25 μg/m3 was not recorded.
The annual limit value for carbon monoxide (3 μg/m3) was not exceeded at any
measuring point in Belgrade in 2016.
-

The results of the benzene and ground-level ozone measurements in 2016 showthat there were no exceedances of the annual limit value.
Content of heavy metals (lead (Pb), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd) and nickel (Ni)) in PM 10
particles in 2016 is shown in the following figure:

Figure 108 Average annual values of heavy metals in 2016 (Source: SEPA)
The recorded mean concentrations are much lower than the target value for the heavy metals
indicated.
The 2016 air quality assessment is based on annual concentrations of pollutants, in accordancewith the Regulation on monitoring conditions and air quality requirements.
248_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Analysing the obtained results of continuous measurements of the level of pollutants fromstationary sources of air pollution in populated areas in the state and local network during 2016
for the City of Belgrade it was concluded that air quality in the City of Belgrade is of the third
category, i.e. excessively polluted, due to exceeding the limit values for PM 10 and NO 2 , while,
generally speaking, soot and sulfur dioxide concentrations can be said to be declining.
Maximum concentrations for the period 2011-2015 for these pollutants are shown in the table.
Table 37 Maximum daily concentrations of pollutants in Belgrade
Concentrations by years (µg/m3)
Parameter
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
soot
238
115
183
64
172
SO 2
550
401
174
111
189
NO 2
658
245
408
231
231
PM 10
94
630
341
281
280
(Source: City of Belgrade Environmental Quality in 2012 2013, 2014 and 2015,
Secretariat for Environmental Protection, October 2016)
Monitoring of air quality in the local network in the territory of Belgrade is determined by the
Program of air quality control in the territory of Belgrade, number 501-164/16-S ("Official
Gazette of the City of Belgrade", no. 14/16).
The program is in compliance with the Regulation on monitoring conditions and air quality
requirements ("Official Gazette of RS", no. 11/10, 75/10, 63/13) and thus prescribes thefollowing: selection of measuring stations and measuring sites, pollutants to be monitored,
sampling methods and methods for determining pollutants, as well as air quality assessment
criteria.
The program covers continuous fixed measurements (level of pollutants originating fromstationary sources of air pollution in populated areas and level of pollutants originating fromstationary sources of air pollution in industrial areas) and indicative measurements (level ofpollutants originating from mobile sources of air pollution).
Sampling and measurement of pollutants is carried out 24 hours throughout the year. Data fromautomatic measuring stations ("real time" measurements) are averaged to 1 hour, and from semiautomatic to 24 hours.
Concentrations of pollutants are expressed as mean hourly and/or mean daily values, except for
carbon monoxide and ground-level ozone, which are expressed as mean eight-hour andmaximum eight-hour values. The values obtained are expressed in micrograms per cubic meter,
except for carbon monoxide, which is expressed in milligrams per cubic meter.

249_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The air quality assessment was performed according to the criteria prescribed in the Regulation
on monitoring conditions and air quality requirements.
Below are the data from measurement sites in the local air quality control network during 2017
(Source: Belgrade Environmental Quality for 2017, City Administration, Secretariat forEnvironmental Protection, 2018).
The following graphs show the mean values of daily 24-hour measurements of pollutants in the
period 01.01.2017 - 31.12.2017, the lowest and highest mean 24-hour values, the number ofmeasurements with exceeding the limit, tolerance value and maximum allowable value (for soot)for 24 hours, as well as the number of measurements with exceeding the limit and tolerance perhour (with automatic measuring stations) at 18 measuring points/stations for continuous fixed
measurements of pollutant levels originating from stationary sources of air pollution in populatedareas.

Graph 1 Lowest and highest mean 24-hour value for soot for 2017

Graph 2 Number of measurements with MDV exceedance for 24 hours for soot in 2017250_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Graph 3 Lowest and highest mean 24-hour values for sulfur dioxide(semi-automatic methods) in 2017.

Graph 4 Lowest and highest mean 24-hour values for nitrogen dioxide(semi-automatic methods) in 2017.

Graph 5 Number of measurements with MDV exceedance for 24 hours for nitrogen dioxide251_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________(semi-automatic methods) in 2017

Graph 6 The highest mean 24-hour value for sulfur dioxide(automatic methods) in 2017

Graph 7 The highest mean 24-hour value for nitrogen dioxide(automatic methods) in 2017

Graph 8 Number of measurements with MDV exceedance for 24 hours for nitrogen dioxide(automatic methods) in 2017252_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Graph 9 Number of measurements with limit and tolerance values exceeded for 1 hour for
nitrogen dioxide (automatic methods) in 2017.

Graph 10 The lowest and highest mean 24-hour values for suspended particles(daily measurements) in 2017253_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Graph 11 Number of measurements with limit and tolerance values exceeded for 24 hours
for suspended particles (daily measurements) in 2017
The analysis of the results of continuous fixed measurements of pollutant levels originating fromstationary sources of air pollution in inhabited areas within the State and Local Networks in 2017concluded that PM10 suspended particles and nitrogen dioxide are predominantly present as
dominant air pollutants in Belgrade.
During 2017, no increase in radioactivity in the atmosphere was detected in the city of Belgrade.
In monthly samples of air and precipitation, low concentrations of radionuclides produced (137Cs
i 90Sr), whose presence is a consequence of the Chernobyl accident.
In addition, a natural radionuclide was detected 7Be, whose concentrations in the air ranged from
0.5 mBq/m3 up to 9.1 mBq/m3, while in precipitation this interval was 2 Bq/ m2 up to 79 Bq/m2.
All measured values are characteristic of Serbia. During the summer, slightly higher values weredetected, which was expected due to the highly seasonal character of this radionuclide.
In the precipitation samples, an isotope 40K was also present, also of natural origin and the values
in which its specific activity was moving did not exceed 40 Bq/m2, which corresponds to its
normal values.
Additional monitoring of air quality during the great fire period in June 2017. (Source: SEPA)
During June 2017, the Vinča landfill was caught by fire. Emerging smoke spread to surroundingparts of the city. During the fire, as well as several days after the extinguishing, the City Instituteof Public Health in Belgrade, which regularly monitors 24 measuring stations within the local
monitoring network, continuously monitored the concentration of pollutants in the air in
Belgrade, with particular emphasis on the situation regarding fire at the Vinča landfill. Particularattention was paid to Lešće, Višnjička Banja, Višnjica, Rospa Ćuprija, Karaburma, Krnjača,Kotež, Borča, Mirijevo, parts of Zvezdara in Belgrade, as well as other parts of the city that may
have been affected, even if they are located at a considerable distance from the landfill, because,due to meteorological conditions during the night and during the early morning hours, pollutants
do not spread very far.
Together with the Secretariat for Environmental Protection of the City of Belgrade, 4 additional
measuring stations were set up to monitor the situation in more detail. Additional measuring
stations measured between 8 June 2017 and 29 June 2017.
These measuring stations were selected to best demonstrate the impact of the Vinča landfill on
air quality:
1.
35 Darinke Jevrić, Višnjička spa with the following parameters: suspended
particles (PM 10 ) with analysis of heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and254_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

ions, benzene and its derivatives, phenolic substances, formaldehyde, acrolein,ammonia;2.
15 Nova 109. ulica, with the following parameters: total suspended
particles with analysis of heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and ions,benzene and its derivatives, phenolic substances, formaldehyde, acrolein, ammonia;
3.
Environmental Agency, 27a Ruže Jovanović Street with the following
parameters: total suspended particles with analysis of heavy metals, polycyclicaromatic hydrocarbons and ions, benzene and its derivatives, phenolic substances,formaldehyde, acrolein, ammonia;
4.
Vinča Pumping Station, PUC Belgrade Water Supply and Sewerage withthe following parameters: suspended PM particles 10 with analysis of heavy metals,
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and ions, benzene and its derivatives, phenolic
substances, formaldehyde, acrolein, ammonia.
In addition, a mobile eco-toxicological unit of the City Institute of Public Health inBelgradevisited
the
site
and
performed
measurementsofpollutants.

Figure 109 New measuring points for monitoring air quality during the fire (Source: SEPA)
255_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

According to the results of the City Institute of Public Health, the results obtained from the
network of measuring stations of regular continuous monitoring of air quality in the period from
8 June 2017 to 29 June 2017, did not show exceedance of the limit values of the basic pollutants(carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen, sulfur, dioxide, suspended particles (PM 10 ), ground-levelozone), which are covered by program measurement of air pollution in Belgrade.
Results with four additional measuring stations, which measured parameters not covered byregular monitoring (PM 10 , phenolic substances, ammonia), show that the measured values did
not exceed the limit values and maximum allowable concentrations established by the Regulation
on monitoring conditions and air quality requirements ("Official Gazette of RS" no. 11/2010,
75/2010 and 63/2013).
The measured concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons did not deviate from thevalues characteristic of the urban environment, except on days 11 June 2017, 12 June 2017 and
13 June 2017, when a concentration variation was observed depending on the compound. Some
compounds tended to decline while some tended to grow. According to the findings of the City
Institute for Public Health, oscillations in the concentrations of certain compounds from thegroup of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are due to the presence of smoke from the fire at the
Vinča landfill.
Results of the zero condition test for the purposes of this project
For the purpose of determining the zero condition of the quality of the environmental parameters,
air quality monitoring was carried out in the wider area of the Vinča landfill complex before thestart of works on the planned facilities.
The monitoring program combines continuous monitoring and passive monitoring carried out
over the same period. The first monitoring period (January) was representative of winterconditions and, generally speaking, represented a statistically unfavourable period of highconcentrations for most pollutants. Sampling and measurement was performed by the City
Institute for Public Health in Belgrade, in accordance with standard methods and accreditation, inthe period January-February 2018.
Continuous monitoring was performed over 28 days and included the following parameters:
determination of mass concentration of sulfur dioxide(automatic method);determination of the mass concentration of nitrogen dioxide
and nitrogen monoxide (automatic method);determination of carbon monoxide mass concentration(automatic method);
PM 10 particle concentration determination;
256_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

determination of the concentration of heavy metals in PM 10
particles;
determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in PM 10
particles;
determination of the mass concentration of ammonia,
hydrogen sulfide, hydrochloride, hydrogen fluoride and volatilearomatic hydrocarbons (BTEX).

Figure 110 Spatial layout of measurement sites for “zero” air quality monitoring
The analysis of the results of the measurements revealed that the concentrations of sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen monoxide and carbon monoxide, with an average time period of 1 and
24 h, during the period of air quality testing at a measuring point set near the administrativebuilding within the existing landfill complex in Vinča (A1), did not exceed the tolerance limits
defined in the Regulation on monitoring conditions and air quality requirements ("Official
Gazette of RS", Nos. 11/2010, 75/2010 and 63/2013).
Analysis of the measurement results revealed that the concentration of PM 10 articles and heavy
metals in it, with a 24-hour aggregate period, exceeded the limit value 9 times during the periodof air quality testing at the given location.
No exceedance of the limit value prescribed for lead has been observed. The concentration ofheavy metals As, Cd and Ni is prescribed by the annual target value, so it is not possible tocomment on the results obtained from 28 days of air quality testing, it is only necessary to notethat this mean value during the monitoring period was not higher than the annual standard for air
quality.

257_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Benzo (a) pyrene is defined under the Regulation as representing a group of polycyclic aromatichydrocarbons of compounds in PM 10 particles through the target value on an annual basis and it
is not possible to comment on the results obtained on the basis of 28 days of air quality testing.
Analysis of the results of the measurements showed that the concentrations of ammonia,
hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride, with an aggregation period of 24hours, were below the quantification limit of the methods used, i.e. there was no exceeding of the
maximum allowable concentration of these parameters during the air quality test period.
Regarding the concentration of volatile aromatic hydrocarbons (BTEX), with a 24-hour
aggregation period, benzene is recognized by the Regulation as representative of the analyzed
compounds through the annual limit value, therefore it is not possible to comment on the results
obtained based on a 28-day air quality test period . On the other hand, the results show that themass concentrations of toluene did not exceed the maximum permissible value for a period of 7
days.
Sampling by passive samplers was done for a period of 15 days between 31 January and 15
February 2018. Passive samplers were placed within 3 km around the location of the landfill(measuring points A2 – A6). Air pollutants measured were: PM 10 , HF, NO 2 , SO 2 , HCl, Hg,
BTEX and heavy metals. Average concentrations were calculated over a period of 15 days.
Content of PM 10 , NO 2 , SO 2 , Pb and benzene are given in the Regulation as a daily and annual
target value, therefore it is not possible to properly comment on the results obtained on the basisof the above air quality monitoring, but it should be noted that:- Levels of NO 2 , SO 2 and Pb are much lower than daily AQS- Benzene concentrations are below the annual AQS, except for the Air 6 measuring
point where this value is exceeded- PM 10 concentrations are below the daily and annual AQS except for the Air 3
measuring point.
Continuous measurement over 7 days in the month of April 2018 was performed at threelocations (A2, A4 and A6) to determine:- Mass concentration of nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen monoxide- Mass concentration of suspended PM 10 particles.
The three locations where PM 10 concentrations and nitrogen oxides were monitored are:
- Slanci Monastery (A7); 79 Vinčanska Str (A8) and 27a Ruže Jovanović Str (A9).
The analysis of the measurement results showed that the concentrations of nitrogen oxides with a
one-hour aggregation period during the period of air quality testing at the locations concerned did
not exceed the limit or tolerance values defined in the Regulation on monitoring conditions andair quality requirements ("Official Gazette of RS", No. 11/2010, 75/2010 and 63/2013). It wasalso found that the concentrations of PM 10 particles at defined measuring points do not exceed
the values defined by the Regulation.
258_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

5.3. WATERS
Previously available data
Groundwater quality control in the territory of Belgrade već has been systematically controlled
for more than 40 years by the Belgrade City Institute of Public Health in cooperation with theSecretariat for Environmental Protection. In 2017, the monitoring programme covered 24
watercourses and 28 controlling sites (Source: Environmental quality in Belgrade for 2017, City
administration, Secretariat for Environmental Protection, 2018).
The aim of monitoring is: assessment of creditworthiness of watercourses compared to therelevant regulations, monitoring of the water pollution trend, assessment of suitability for watersupply of Obrenovac, Barič and Vinča, assessment of sanitary status of watercourses andopportunities for healthy and safe recreation of citizens, suitability for fishery, irrigation ofagricultural areas, monitoring of sedimentation of nonorganic and organic sedimentmicropollutants and bioaccumulation in hydrobionts, assessment of self-purification capacity,
saprobe status and progress of the eutrophication process, provision of data for designing thewastewater treatment plant, and verification of the efficiency of taken measures for ensuring thewater quality and contingent measures for remediation, protection and improvement.
The following freshwater ecosystem media are controlled through monitoting: water, sedimentand hydrobionts.
In the water are determined: general and fundamental physical and chemical, microbiologicalparameters and elements for classification of the ecological potential and assessment ofsuitability for swimming, as well as priority, priority hazardous and other pollutants.
In the sediment are determined: general parameters, heavy and toxic metals and organic
micropollutants, while bioaccumulation of organic and inorganic micropollutants are monitored
in hydrobionts (seashell and fish).
Water quality of the Danube
The Danube is a large lowland river Danube with the domination of fine sediment and according
to the Rulebook on the parameters of ecological and chemical status of surface waters andparameters of the quantitative status of groundwaters (Official Gazette of RS, No. 74/2011) it
belongs to watercourses type 1. Out of 33 analysed samples in 2017, none of the Danube water
samples complied with class II quality of surface waters.
Breach of norms for the prescribed class was observed with 11 (33.3 %) samples as aconsequence of increased values of some microbiological and physical-chemical parameters,
while in the case of 22 (66.7 %) samples deviations were observed only due to somemicrobiological parameters.
259_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Concerning the chemical and physical-chemical parameters supporting the ecological status, within theconstant limits of class II were: the pH value, electrical conductivity, five-day biological consumptionof oxygen (BPK 5 ), HPK permanganate method, bichromate method, total mineralization andconcentration: of TOC, orthophosphate, sulphates, chloride, nitrates, nitrites and total phosphorus
solution.
The oxygen regime is more balanced than last year, with fewer deviations from class II. The amount ofexceeded limit values is not large, all are in class III of river waters, and they do not therefore violate
the present aquatic fauna.
Testing of the so-called “triad nitrogen” (NH 4 , NO 2 i NO 3 ) show that the Danube load with protein
substances is relatively low.
Both phases of mineralization of nitrogen substances take place successfully, which is understandable
given the high discharge and great amount of oxygen..
The content of nutrients (P i N) is relatively low but sufficient to ensure the growth of algae andmacrophytes, especially in areas with slow flow.
The presence of mineral oils was not detected in any tested sample.
Detergent (ABS) and phenol content was constantly below the limit of detection of the analyticalmethod used. The situation is practically similar as in the several previous years. Among standardized
non-organic and organic micropollutants, the following micropollutants were constantly below thelimit of detection of the method used: Cd, Hg, Cr, Cu, Ni, PAH, while the presence of different
pesticides, As, Zn, Pb, Ni was sporadically detected in the tested samples.
For many years, the microbiological pollution of the Danube in the Belgrade area, and even in Serbia
has been greater and more significant than the chemical pollution, because the sanitary waste watersof Novi Sad, Belgrade and other cities on the Danube are discharged into the recipient without any
purification. This is best seen through the number of bacteria which are the indicators of fecal
pollution. Sanitary-microbiological tests show that none of the samples were within the limits of riverwaters class II. The number of total coliforms deviated from class II in 22 (66.7%) samples, thenumber of fecal pollution coliforms deviated from the prescribed class in 28 (80%) samples, while thenumber of intestinal enterococci was high in 11 (33.3%) samples. Investigations of macroinvertebrate,phytoplankton and phytobenthos communities, as well as calculated indexes, show that the ecologicalstatus of the Danube river on both tested sites is poor.
According to the Regulation on emission limit values of polluting substances (RS Official Gazette”,
No. 50/2012) none of the tested parameters of the sediment samples from both sites did nod not exceed
the remediation value, which is very favourable. At the Batajnica location it was established thatconcentrations of Cd, Zn, Cu, phenatrene, fluorantene, benzo, anthracene, benzo(a)fluoranthene,
benzo(k)fluorenthene and benzo(a)pyrene were above the target values, while concentrations of Ni
were above the maximum permitted value.
260_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________At the Vinča locality it was established that concentrations of Zn, Cu, Hg, phenatrene,
fluoranthene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(k) fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene and total hydrocarbons
were above the target values, while concentrations of nickel were above the maximum permitted
value.
Compounds from the group of insecticides, herbicides and polychlorinated biphenyls were notregistered in the Danube sediment.
Concentrations of Hg and As found in the muscle tissue of tested fish samples were lower than
the referent values. No organic pollutants were established in the tested samples.
Through testing of sea shell muscle tissue samples, the presence of Pb, Cd, Hg was established,
and the obtained concentrations were lower than the referent values. No organic pollutants were
established in the tested samples.
Comparative results of the Danube waters quality, by parameter groups, in the territory ofBelgrade in the last thirteen years, are shown in the following table, but we point out that theparameters of control and standards have been changed, so that the comparison is not valid:
Table 38.Quality of the Danube waters in the period 2004 - 2017 (Source: Environmental
quality in Belgrade in 2017, City administration,
Environmental control Secretariat, 2018)
Year

2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2015
2016
2017

Number of
taken
samples
68
68
68
68
68
68
40
40
30
30
4
16
33

In class II of riverwatersNumber ofsamples
27
13
11
20
27
12
10
18
2
3
0
1 6,
0

%
39,7
19,2
16,2
29,4
39,7
17,6
25,0
45,0
6,7
10,0
0
6,25
0

Not included in class II, due to changed parameters
Physical-chemical
Number ofsamples
10
26
23
17
8
14
13
5
13
10
1
15
11

%
14,7
38,2
33,8
25,0
11,8
20,6
32,5
12,5
43,3
33,3
25,0
93,75
33,33

Only physicalchemical
Number%of samples
5
7,4
9
13,2
9
13,2
8
11,8
15
22,1
10
14,7
6
15,0
4
10,0
0
0
3
10,0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Only microbiological
Numberof samples
26
20
25
23
18
32
11
13
15
14
3
0
22

%
38,2
29,4
36,8
33,8
26,4
47,1
27,5
32,5
50,0
46,7
75,0
0
66,7

261
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Quality of groundwaters in the territory of Belgrade in 2017
Through systematic control of characteristics of spring waters from public taps, monitoring of thequality of ground waters in the territory of Belgrade is conducted. The programme is realized forthe purpose of monitoring the indicators of the state of environment, quality of groundwatersfrom springs that can be used as alternative sources of water supply, also bearing in mind thepreventive role regarding the citizens' health protection.
In 2017, the Programme of hygienic quality control of spring waters covered 30 public taps
facilities in the city territory, where testing of 15 public taps is conducted twice a monththroughout the year, and from 15 facilities in suburban settlements, once a month in the period
from April to September(Source: Environmental quality in Belgrade in 2017, City
administration, Environmental control Secretariat, 2018).

Number ofsamplesName of facility

Bad physical-chemical
statusBroj%

Bad bacteriologicalstatus
Numbe
%
r
8
33.3
13
54.2
6
25.0
0
0.0

1. Hajdučka tap
2. Miljakovački Spring
3. Sv. Petka Kalemegdan-after filtration
4. Sv. Petka man. Rakovica- after filtration

24
24
24
22

2
0
4
19

8.3
0.0
16.7
86.4

5. Spring Sakinac Avala

24

23

95.8

5

20.8

6. Topčiderska tap – right

24

22

91.7

4

16.7

7. Topčiderska tap – left

24

23

95.8

5

20.8

8. Kakanjska tap

24

0

0.0

21

87.5

9. Pašina tap II – Zvezdara

24

24

100.0

23

95.8

10. Public tap Milošev konak

22

0

0.0

10

45.5

11. Public tap Bele vode12 Spring Zmajevac
13. Public tap Višnjica
14. Spring Točkić Barajevo

24
24
24
24

0
0
1
0

0.0
0.
4.2
0.0

22
24
23
16

91.7
100.0
95.8
66.7

15. Public tap Higijenski zavod Grabovac
16. Višnjička banja
17. Public tap Boleč
18. Public tap Mokroluška

24
6
5
6

10
5
0
6

41.7
83.3
0.0
100.0

12
5
4
3

50.0
83.3
80.0
50.0

19. Memorial tap – Letićeva
20. Large tap Beli potok
21. Monastery Rajnovac
22. Spring Točak Zuce
23. Public tap Jajinci
24. Public tap Radmilovac

6

6

100.0

6

100.0

2
6
6
6
3

2
0
6
0
0

100.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0

1
4
6
3
2

50.0
66.7
100.0
50.0
66.7

262
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
25. Public tap Čelamino brdo
26. Lovačka tap Beli Potok
27. Public tap “kod Ice”, Umčari
28. Spring Kamenac - Beli Potok
29. Zorina tap – Grocka
30. Public tap Pandurice
TOTAL

6
6
6
6
6
6
438

0
0
4
3
6
2
168

0.0
0.0
66.7
50.0
100.0
33.3
38.4%

0
5
5
5
40
6
252

0.0
83.3
83.3
83.3
66.7
100.0
57.5%

Based on the results of conducted laboratory testing of water quality from public taps in the
territory of Belgrade in 2017, it was noted that the majority of tested samples of spring waters did
not meet the criteria foreseen by the Rulebook on hygienic safety of drinking water, where thecriterion of bad microbiological quality was the greatest issue.
The most frequent reason for low hygienic quality of groundwaters from public taps wasbacteriological pollution which was, except for the increased total coliform bacteria, also of
fecal origin (Escherichia coli, coliform bacteria of fecal origin and Streptococcus D).
The presence of fecal bacteria in ground waters from public taps indicates poor sanitary-hygienic
state of the facilities and environment and is a significant hygienic-epidemiological risk for theusers.
The physical-chemical quality of waters is relatively satisfactory at most public taps, except forthe spring waters of Sakinac, Topčiderska tap Mokroluška tap, Velika tap at Beli potok, springwaters of Točak in Zuce, Public tap Višnjička banja, Pašina tap II, Public tap Jajinci, Public tap“kod Ice”, spring waters of Kamenac, memorial taps.
Letićeva and Zorina taps which are generally out of order due to the increased nitate and chloride
content and increased electrical conductivity.
The water filter placed at the Sveta Petka spring in Kalemegdan Park, gives satisfactory results
concerning water conditioning which was not good for drinking (before filtration) in the previous
years, due to the presence of a greater concentration of certain chemical parameters (chlorides,
nitrates, arsenic).
The water filter Filter placed at the Sveta Petka spring in the monastery of Rakovica, gives
satisfactory results concerning water conditioning of groundwaters which was mostly bad for
drinking before filtration, due to the presence of a greater concentration of certain chemicalparameters (chromium). However, due to the unregulated level of free residual chlorium in thewater, a great percentage of chemical issues was recorded after chlorination.

263_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The biological quality of groundwaters was unsatisfatory at some public taps, where findings
indicate possible penetration of surface waters into the captures, as well as the presence oforganic deposits (silt), which is an excellent ground for growth and development of micro andmacro organisms, and which can have a significant effect on the quality, namely hygienic qualityof drinking water.
The reasons for frequently bad hygienic quality of groundwaters from public taps should befocused on the negative anthropogenic impact on environmental substrates in the urban area, andparticularly in the fact that there is no regular infrastructural maintenance of facilities (repair ofdamages, cleaning and desinfection of captures), nor adequate environmental planning.

Fig. 111. Overview of public taps where there is surveillance of groundwater quality (April
2018)

264
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Results of baseline testing for the purpose of this project
Physical-chemical analyses of surface waters
For the purpose of preparing studies on the environmental impact assessment of projects forconstruction of new landfill and EfW facility, and for the purpose of establishing the current
baseline for suface water quality on a broader site before commencement of construction works
on remediation of the current landfill, construction of new landfill and EfW facility, sampling
and analysis of water samples with a total of 7 sites during March and June 2018: 1. and 2.
Ošljan stream, 3. Ošljan pond (small), 4. Ošljan pond (large), 5. Leachate waters from thelandfill, 6. River Danube (downstream) and 7. River Danube (upstream).

Fig. 112. Overview of the sampling site of surface waters in March and June 2018.
Fig. Translation: Surface water 1, 2,3,4,5
Legend: Sampling point of surface water
Landfill body at Vinča
Sampling and sample analysis was done by the accredited laboratory Anahem from Belgrade inaccordance with the standard methods shown in the official laboratory Report.
The analysis of samples and the interpretation of results were done in accordance with theRegulation on limit values of pollutants in surface water, groundwater and sediments anddeadlines for their achievement (Official Gazette of RS, No. 50/2012), the Rulebook on the265_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

establishment of surface water and groundwater bodies (Official Gazette of RS, No. 96/10), andthe Regulation on limit values of priority and priority hazardous substances polluting surface
water and deadlines for their achievement (Official Gazette of RS, No. 24/2014).
Since these are watercourses, except Danube, which are not covered by the Rulebook on theestablishment of surface water and groundwater bodies, the limit values (LV) for the ecologicalstatus class for surface watercourse Type VI were used for the interpretation of the results(watercourses which are not covered by the Rulebook on the establishment of surface water andgroundwater bodies (Official Gazette of RS, No. 96/10).
The obtained results are presented in Table, with the following colours used for the interpretationof water classes by each parameter :LV
CLASS I*LV
CLASS IILV
CLASS IIILV
CLASS IVLV
CLASS V

266_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 39 The test results of surface water in the landfill area, March and June 2018
SW1

SW2

SW3

(1803281601)(1803281602)(1803281603)

SAMPLE CODE AND PERIOD OF SAMPLING CAMPAIGN
SW3
SW4
SW 4
SW5

Test Parameter

Unit

March

march

march

march

ColuorOdor
Watertemperature
Air temperature
Visible floating
matter
Turbidity
Electric
conductivity at
20 °C
Dissolved
oxygen O 2pH
Vapor residue (at105 °C)
Chemical oxygen
demand (COD)
Consumption of
KMnO 4
Biochemical
oxygen demand(BOD 5 )AOX
Total nitrogen
Total ORGANIC
nitrogenaccording to
Kjeldahl
Ammonia (mg/l
NH 4 -N)
Nitrates NO₃⁻
Nitrites NO₂⁻
Total NONORGANIC
nitrogendescription
description

Black
Unpleasant

black
unpleasant

black
unpleasantpale yellow
present

°C

15,4

15,4

15,5

29,0

°C

16.2

16,2

16,0

description

Present

present

NTU

29

29

μS/cm

21150

mg/l

5,3

(1806191303)(1803281604)

SW 6

SW 7

(1806191301)(1806191302)(1806191304)(1803281605)

march

June

march

june

june

brown-black
unpleasantpale yellow
present

black
unpleasantpale yellow
present

pale yellow
without

15,3

29,0

13,7

29,0

29,0

27,4

15,8

28,1

14,1

25,3

24,6

present

present

present

without

present

without

without

25

0,56

3,5

1,1

30

20

27

16940

18610

389

443

406

6054

442

439

5,2

7,1

6,4

10,1

6,5

3,9

6,8

6,7

/

8,4

8,4

8,3

7,5

7,8

7,5

7,8

7,8

7,7

mg/l

388

376

8948

264

286

221

3516

237

250

mg/l

4855

4951

5794

10

23

20

1110

24

20

mgO2/l

1063

724

1105

5,3

4,36

5,6

177

5,8

5,1

mg/l

400

450

600

4,0

10,0

5,0

190

6,0

5,0

mg/l
mgN/l

2,3
1041

1,6
1027

2,1
1033

<10
1,1

<0,01
4,3

<10
0,9

0,13
214

<10
1,4

<10
1,6

mgN/l

580

605

654

0,69

1,6

0,44

123

0,33

0,35

mg/l

449

416

373

<0,05

1,2

<0,05

89

<0,05

<0,05

mgN/l
mgN/l

12
<0,03

5,7
<0,03

6,3
<0,03

0,43
<0,03

1,5
<0,03

0,52
<0,03

2,3
<0,03

1,1
<0,03

1,3
<0,03

mgN/l

461

422

379

0,43

2,7

0,52

91

1,1

1,3

267
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Chlorides ClSulfates SO₄⁻²
Fluorides
SulfidesSodium Na
Nitrites NO₂⁻
Total ORGANIC
nitrogen
Chlorides ClSulfates SO₄⁻²
Fluorides
SulfidesSodium Na
Potassium K
Magnesium Mg
Calcium Ca
Iron Fe
Manganese Mn
Boron B
Total organiccarbon (TOC)
Copper Cu
Total chromium
Cr
Chromium
Cr VI
Lead Pb
Zink Zn
Cadmium Cd
Arsenic As
Mercury Hg
Orthophosphates
CyanidesPhenolic index
Mineral oils C10C40
Benzene, µg/l
Toluene, µg/l
Ethylbenzene, µg/l
Xylene, µg/l
Styrene, µg/l

mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mgN/l

2854
443
<0,05
19
907
<0,03

2080
193
<0,05
16
742
<0,03

2316
187
<0,05
18
693

19
28
<0,05
<0,5
7,2

22
21
<0,05
<0,5
12

28
27
<0,05
<0,5
7,9

<0,03

<0,03

<0,03

<0,03

936
194
<0,035
14
308

25
24
<0,05
<0,5
7,3

24
25
<0,05
<0,5
65

<0,03

<0,03

<0,03

mgN/l

461

422

379

0,43

2,7

0,52

91

1,1

1,3

mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l

2854
443
<0,05
19
907
616
84
105
19
0,73
5,5

2080
193
<0,05
16
742
542
84
62
16
0,58
4,5

2316
187
<0,05
18
693
523
58
74
17
0,70
5,3

19
28
<0,05
<0,5
7,2
4,6
8,8
35
<0,3
<0,05
<0,1

22
21
<0,05
<0,5
12
2,6
7,9
39
0,67
<0,01
0,11

28
27
<0,05
<0,5
7,9
4,7
9,6
40
<0,3
<0,05
<0,1

936
194
<0,035
14
308
196
56
84
8,3
0,97
1,9

25
24
<0,05
<0,5
7,3
2,9
9,9
35
<0,3
<0,05
<0,1

24
25
<0,05
<0,5
65
2,8
9,2
34
<0,3
<0,05
<0,1

mg/l

2702

2936

2961

9,7

17,7

10,1

915

6,2

7,8

mg/l

0,350

0,080

0,300

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

mg/l

0,82

0,70

0,80

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

mg/l

<0,05

<0,05

<0,05

<0,01

<0,05

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l

<0,02
0,30
<0,0050,10<0,001
26
<0,01
0,104

<0,02
0,38
<0,0050,068<0,001
21
<0,01
0,088

<0,02
0,28
<0,0050,077<0,001
24
<0,01
1,12

<0,01
<0,05
<0,0005<0,001<0,001
<0,01
0,004
<0,01

<0,02
<0,05
<0,005<0,001<0,001
0,46
<0,01
0,022

<0,01
<0,05
<0,0005<0,001<0,001
<0,01
0,010
<0,01

<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<0,01
<0,05
<0,0005<0,001<0,001<0,01<0,001
<0,01

<0,01
<0,05
<0,0005<0,001<0,001<0,01<0,001
<0,01

mg/l

12

17

15

<0,1

1,1

<0,1

<0,01

<0,1

<0,1

µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l

<1,0
<1,0
<2,0
<0,5
<2,0

<1,0
<1,0
<2,0
<0,5
<2,0

<1,0
<1,0
<2,0
<0,5
<2,0

<1,0
<1,0
<2,0
<0,5
<2,0

<1,0
<1,0
<2,0
<0,5
<2,0

<1,0
<1,0
<2,0
<0,5
<2,0

<1,0
<1,0
<2,0
<0,5
<2,0

<1,0
<1,0
<2,0
<0,5
<2,0

<1,0
<1,0
<2,0
<0,5
<2,0

268
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Alachlor, μg/l
Aldrin, μg/l
Atrazine, μg/l
a-BHC, μg/l
b-BHC, μg/l
d-BHC, μg/l
g-BHC, μg/l
Chlorobenzilate, μg/l
Chlorothalonil, μg/l
Chloroneb, μg/l
Dacthal, μg/l
p,p'-DDD, μg/l
p,p'-DDE, μg/l
p, p'-DDT, μg/l
Dieldrin, μg/l
Endosulfan l, μg/l
Endosulfan II, μg/l
Endosulfan sulfate,μg/l
Endrin, μg/l
Endrin aldehyde,
μg/l
Etridiazole, μg/l
a-Chlordane, μg/l
g-Chlordane, μg/l
Heptachlor, μg/l
Heptachlor epoxide,μg/l
Methoxychlor, μg/l
Permethrin, μg/l
Simazine, μg/l
Nonachlor, μg/l
Ametryn, μg/l
Atrazine, μg/l
Bromacil, μg/l
Butylat, μg/l
Chlorpropham, μg/l
Dursban, μg/l
Cycloat, μg/l
Cyanazin, μg/l
Dichlorvos, μg/l
Diphenamid, μg/l
EPTC, μg/l

µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l

<1,0
<0,03
<0,1
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,02
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<1,0
<0,03
<0,1
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,02
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<1,0
<0,03
<0,1
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,02
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<1,0
<0,03
<0,1
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,02
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<1,0
<0,03
<0,1
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,02
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<1,0
<0,03
<0,1
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,02
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<1,0
<0,03
<0,1
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,02
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<1,0
<0,03
<0,1
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,02
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<1,0
<0,03
<0,1
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,02
<0,02
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

µg/l

<0,05

<0,05

<0,05

<0,05

<0,05

<0,05

<0,05

<0,05

<0,05

µg/l

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

µg/l

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l

<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01

µg/l

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l

<0,05
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05

<0,05
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05

<0,05
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05

<0,05
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05

<0,05
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05

<0,05
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05

<0,05
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05

<0,05
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05

<0,05
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05

269
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Ethoprop, μg/l
Fenarimol, μg/l
Fluridone, μg/l
Hexazinone, μg/l
Methyl paraoxon,
μg/l
Metribuzin, μg/l
Mevinphos, μg/l
MGK-264, μg/l
Molinate, μg/l
NaproPAMId, μg/l
Norflurazon, μg/l
Prometon, μg/l
Prometryn, μg/l
Pronamide, μg/l
Propazine, μg/l
Simetryne, μg/l
Tetrachlorvinphos,
μg/l
Tebuthiuron, μg/l
Perban, μg/l
Triadimefon, μg/l
Trifluralin, μg/l
Acenaphthene, μg/l
Benzo(a)pyrene, μg/l
Benzo(b)fluoranthene, μg/lBenzo(g,h,i)perylene, μg/lBenzo(k)fluoranthene, μg/lIndeno(1,2,3cd)pyrene, μg/l
Naphthalene, μg/l
Total coliforms
Fecal coliforms
Intestinal enterococci
Number of aerobic
heterotrophs at 37°C

µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1

µg/l

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,1
<0,1

µg/l

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l
µg/l

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,05
<0,01

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,05
<0,01

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,05
<0,01

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,05
<0,01

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,05
<0,01

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,05
<0,01

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,05
<0,01

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,05
<0,01

<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,05
<0,05
<0,01

µg/l

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

µg/l

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

µg/l

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

µg/l

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

<0,1

µg/l
cfu/100ml
cfu/100ml
cfu/10
0ml

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

<0,01

>240002400

2400>24000<10>24000>24000

430

4600

40

<10

230

150

<10

430

>24000<1040>240004600>24000150<10>24000

2400

<10

40

4,2 x 107

3,1 x 107

5,6 x 107

9,3 x 105

20000

1,68 x 106

9,7 x 106

8,5 x 105

1,15 x 106

cfu/100ml

Legend: SW1. and SW2. Ošljan stream, SW3. Ošljan pond (small), SW4. Ošljan pond (large), SW5. Leachate from the landfill, SW6. river Danube (downstream) and SW7 river Danube (upstream).

270_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Based on the above, it can be concluded that the results of physical and chemical analysis of Ošljanski
potok (Ošljan stream) and Ošljanska bara (Ošljan pond) at locations SW1, SW2, SW3 and SW5, showthat some of the most important parameters that determine water quality (COD, BOD 5 , total nitrogen,ammonia, consumption of KMnO 4 , chlorides, phosphates, phenols, conductivity, number of aerobic
heterotrophs) have significantly greater values than the parameters corresponding to the V class water.
From this it can be concluded that these are uncategorized watercourses, that is non-class water. Suchwaters cannot be used for any purpose and their environmental impact is extremely unfavorable due totheir potential for contamination. It can be concluded that surface water at these locations has poor
ecological status from the chemical and microbiological aspect.
For the SW4 sample, the results of physical and chemical analyzes for the parameters BOD 5 ,phosphates and phenols correspond to class IV waters, and for parametres total nitrogen, consumptionof KMnO 4 and aerobic heterotrophs to class III waters. For the parameters COD, nitrates, chlorides,
sulfates, metal content, fecal coliforms, total coliform bacteria and intestinal enterococci, the obtained
values correspond to class I water. Better water quality at this location compared to the other four
locations is probably due to dilution due to the increased Danube water level at the moment ofsampling. It can be concluded that at this location water has a mixed, excellent to poor ecologicalstatus from the chemical and microbiological aspect.
Regarding the results of the analysis of the samples of the Ošljanska bara (Ošljan pond) performed inJune 2018 at locations SW3 and SW4, much better water quality is detected.
The results of the physical-chemical analysis of the small Ošljanska bara (Ošljan pond) (sample SW3)
show that at the sampling site most of the analyzed parameters correspond to the quality of the waterof the I class, except for the consumption parameters KMnO 4 , BPK 5 and total nitrogen corresponding
to the quality of the water of the II class. Bacteriological analysis shows that for fecal coliforms, total
coliform bacteria and intestinal enterococci, the obtained values correspond to the I class, while thevalue obtained for aerobic heterotrophies corresponds to the quality of water V class. It can beconcluded that in this location water has a mixed ecological status from the chemical andmicrobiological aspect.
The results of physical and chemical analyzes of the large Ošljanska bara (Ošljan pond) (sample SW4)
show that at the sampling location most of the analyzed parameters correspond to the quality of thewater of the I class, except for the consumption parameter KMnO4 and the total coliforms
corresponding to the quality of the water class II and the oxygen-dissolved parameters, COD and
BOD5 that correspond to the quality of water of the III class. Bacteriological analysis shows that for
total coliform bacteria and intestinal enterococci, the obtained values correspond to class I, while thevalue obtained for aerobic heterotrophs corresponds to the quality of water V class. It can beconcluded that in this location water has a mixed ecological status from the chemical andmicrobiological aspect. The reason for the different values of the parameters of the quality of thesewaters analyzed in March and June may lie in the increased quantity of waste water during thesampling period in May, but also in the large quantities of precipitation that were present during theentire month of June, resulting in dilution water in the pond.
271_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Regarding the results of the Danube River analysis conducted in June 2018 at locations
downstream and upstream of the existing landfill in Vinča, they show that at the sampling
location, most of the analyzed parameters correspond to the quality of water I class, except for
the KMnO4 consumption parametres, total nitrogen, nitrates and fecal coliforms, whichcorrespond to the quality of the water of the II class. Some of the more important parameters that
determine water quality (COD, BOD5, dissolved oxygen, total coliforms) correspond to thequality of water of the III class. It can be concluded that in this location water has a mixed
ecological status from the chemical and microbiological aspect.
Physical-chemical analysis of groundwaters
Chemical analyses of the groundwater sampled from piezometers (Pz-1 to Pz-6) and some otherexisting boreholes (NP-11 and asphalt base well) were also performed for the purpose ofdetermining the groundwater quality, in accordance with the Regulation on the Programmme of
Systematic Monitoring of Soil Quality via Indicators for Assessment of Soil Degradation Risk
and Methodology for Creation of Remediation Programmes (“Official Gazette of the Republic of
Serbia”, No. 88/10), Annex 2: Remediation values of concentrations of hazardous and deleterious
substances and values that could indicate significant groundwater contamination.
The results of these analyses are presented within a document named “Report on Groundwater
Quality”, prepared by Energoprojekt Hidroinženjering from Belgrade in April 2018.
For the assessment of groundwater quality, two series of water sampling and analyses were
performed by the certified laboratory of Occupational Safety and Environmental Protection"Belgrade" PLC and they are as follows:− Series I: sampling was performed in November 2017 at the following locations: NP-11,
Pz-1, Pz-2, Pz-4, Pz-5, Pz-6;− Series II: sampling was performed in March 2018 at the following locations: NP-11,
Pz-2, Pz-4, Pz-5 and water from asphalt base well.
As mentioned in the Report, these piezometer locations were selected for investigation in order toanalyze the impacts of the existing landfill on groundwater quality (NP-11, Pz-1, Pz-2 andpossibly Pz-4, which are located downstream from the existing landfill) and groundwater quality
in the part that should not be exposed to the impact of the existing landfill (Pz-5, Pz-6 and asphaltbase well, which are located upstream from the existing landfill). Results indicate the following
conclusions:
The pH value of water in piezometers varies in the slightly alkaline range, amounting to 7.2–8,
except in NP-11 and Pz-1, where the values in Series I were 6.7 and 6.9 (slightly acid medium).
The values of turbidity are mostly high, ranging from 2.06 to 136 NTU. The total suspended
solids are in the range of 13–390 mg/l. High values were registered in the impact zone of theexisting landfill (NP-11), which is logical, but also in the asphalt base well (185 mg/l). It isinteresting to note that the highest values of turbidity and suspended solids were registered in Pz5, which is not exposed to the impact of the existing landfill (136 NTU and 390 mg/l).
272_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Electric conductivity is the highest in the impact zone of the existing landfill i.e. in Pz-1 (12,620
μS/cm), Np-11 (4,380 μS/cm), Pz-4 (1,349 μS/cm) and Pz-2 (1,234 μS/cm). Total residue after
evaporation at 180 oC corresponded to values of electric conductivity. Out of mineral substances,macro components, chlorides are most frequent in the impact zone of the existing landfill: Pz-1
(3,711.31 mg/l) and NP-11 (10,515.32 mg/l), while other values ranged from 6mg/l to 134 mg/l.
The lowest value was registered in the asphalt base well. A high value of sodium was registeredin the landfill impact zone, in Pz-1, being 2,156.9 mg/l. Other values ranged from 8.1 to 232.8
mg/l. The concentration of bicarbonates was the highest in NP-11 (1017 mg/l), while the valuesof this parameter in other piezometers ranged from 24.5 to 699.2 mg/l. Calcium concentration
was the highest in Pz-1 (434.4 mg/l) and NP-11 (30.3 mg/l).
The highest concentration of nitrate was registered in Pz-1 (370.91 mg/l). The values of thisparameter in other piezometers ranged from < 0.04 mg/l to 12.92 mg/l. The concentration ofammonia was also the highest in Pz-1 (21.4 mg/l), followed by Np-11 (2.72 mg/l). In othersamples, it was below 1 mg/l. Nitrite concentrations in the majority of samples were <0.04 mg/l
and they were 0.08 mg/l only in Pz-2 and 0.3 mg/l in Pz-5. Concentrations of phosphates andtotal phosphorus in all samples were < 0.08 mg/l and < 0.01 mg/l, respectively.
The value of biological oxygen demand (BOD) was highest in Pz-1 (398 mg/l) and NP-11 (63mg/l). On the other hand, very low BOD values (1 and 2 mg/l) were registered in Pz-2, although
this piezometer is under impact of the existing landfill. BOD values in other piezometers ranged
from < 1 to 5 mg/l. Values of chemical oxygen demand (COD) corresponded to BOD values.
Oxygen concentration directly depends on the presence of oxidable substances. Concentrationsof dissolved oxygen were lowest in NP-11 (3.5 mg/l) and Pz-1 (5 mg/l), where the lowest valuesof BOD and COD were also registered. Low value of oxygen concentration was also registeredin the asphalt base well (4.1 mg/l). The well is very deep (300 m) and water has remained in along period of time, while inflow of fresh (storm water) rich in oxygen through a soil layer ofaround 80 m in thickness is very slow.
Concentrations of heavy metals were below the remediation values, in accordance with theRegulation on the Programme of Systematic Monitoring of Soil Quality via Indicators forAssessment of Soil Degradation Risk and Methodology for Creation of Remediation
Programmes (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 88/10), Annex 2: Remediation
values of concentrations of hazardous and deleterious substances and values that could indicate
significant groundwater contamination. The only exceptions were:o Chromium concentration in Pz-1 (0.1 mg/l) while remediation value is 0.03 mg/l;o Copper concentration in Pz-1 (0.13 mg/l) while remediation value is 0.075 mg/l;
o Zinc concentration in Pz-2 (1.62 mg/l) and Pz-5 (1.27 mg/l) while remediation
value is 0.8 mg/l;o Nickel concentration in Pz-1 (0.73 mg/l) and NP-11 (0.13 mg/l) while remediation
value is 0.075 mg/l.
273_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The analyses included control of mineral oils and cyanides. Concentrations of these parameters
were below the respective remediation values, in accordance with the Regulation.
Based on the analyses of water quality performed in November 2017 and March 2018, it was
concluded that water samples from piezometers that are exposed to the impact of the existing
landfill (NP-11, Pz-1, Pz-2 and possibly Pz-4) and the ones that are not under the landfill impact
differ with respect to their physical-chemical composition. It was noted that increased
concentrations of some parameters (turbidity, suspended solids, nitrites, zinc) were registered in
Pz-5, which is not under the impact of the existing landfill.
This situation was explained as a consequence of wash-off from the surrounding terrain (out of
the existing landfill zone) and import of pollutants in groundwater. Namely, piezometer Pz-5
performed on the watershed, at the pont where there is no water flow away, so that “dead water”
remains for a long time in that area. That is why the water is turbid, with a somewhat higher
concentration of suspended substances and nitrite. It is not a matter of contaminatedgroundwaters, but of local contamination. In addition to that, piezometer Pz-5 was performed ona section which is the route through which collectors of secondary raw material transfer
secondary raw material, and due to which organic substances increased on that location.
With respect to the deep well at the asphalt base, it was concluded based on one analysis
performed in March 2018 that the existing landfill has no impact on water quality in the well.

Biological analysis of surface waters in the Project area
The analysis of the conditions of the aquatic ecosystems was done by the expert team from theInstitute for Biological Research "Siniša Stanković" from Belgrade, in early April and middle ofJune 2018. The analysis of macroinvertebrate (invertebrate) communities in surface waters at thesite of the landfill was carried out on samples taken at the same locations where samples forphysical, chemical and microbiological analysis were taken in March 2018
Due to the increased water levels of the Danube at the moment of sampling, it was not possible toapproach the same locations, so the locations from which the samples were taken somewhat
differ. In the second, additional campaign carried out in June, the selected samples were taken at
the same locations where samples for physical-chemical and microbiological analysis weretaken.

274_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 113. Overview of the sampling site of aquatic invertebrates at low and high water levels of the Danube,
April and June 2018
Table 40. Overview of basic information on sampling sites - surface water
Ord.
no.

Sampleidentification

Sampling location description

April 2018

1

SW1

2

SW2

3
4
5
6
1

SW3
SW4
SW5
SW6
June 2018
SW3

2

SW4

The site is located near the landfill body and is under the direct influence of thewaters that flow from it. The water body is highly polluted, it has an intense odour
that resembles the decomposition of organic matter. There are clear indicators ofpollution in the water - oily layers on the surface, sediment of intense andunnatural colour, residues of different waste and other.
The site is also located near the landfill body and the same conditions as in thecase of sampling site SW1 are recorded.
Sampling sites are located in the flooding zone of the Danube, downstream from
Veliko Selo and the side-arm called Mala voda (Small Water). The water level inthis water body depends directly on the Danube river level and it represents a
typical wetland area.
Sampling sites are located in the flooding zone of the Danube, downstream from
Veliko Selo and the side-arm called Mala voda (Small Water). The water level inthis water body depends directly on the Danube river level and it represents a
typical wetland area.

Biological material was collected using nets with mesh diameter of 500 μm, in accordance withthe standard method EN 27828:1998 (Methods for surveying aquatic macro invertebrates inrunning and standing waters are specified by the international standard). All habitats which are
estimated to cover more than 5% of targeted water bodies were included in the sampling.
Research has shown that the presence of macro invertebrates is very poor in all these locations
and in both sampling campaigns (April/June).

275_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Regarding the investigation carried out in April 2018, on locations SW1 and SW5, located rightby the body of the landfill, no water invertebrates were found. At locations SW2, SW3, SW4 andSW6, a total of 15 species from 10 different groups of water macro invertebrates were recorded.
During the analysis, only the species which inhabit aquatic habitats were taken into account,
while for other taxa (terrestrial species), only their presence was recorded.
It is important to note that the hydrological situation for the collection of aquatic macro
invertebrates in the sampling period in April at the SW2, SW3, SW4 and SW6 locations was notfavourable, since the water level was high and that a significant part of the area around theswamp was flooded. Communities of aquatic macro invertebrates in the area which was covered
with water during this period are not representative of the entire water body. The above is nottrue for the locations SW1 and SW5.
Table 41. Results of the analysis for the presence of macro invertebrates in the surface waters, April 2018
Ord.
no.

Types/taxa

Number or recorded species according to thesampling site
SW2

SW3

SW4

SW2

1

Nematodes

2

Limnoodrilus udekemianus Claparède, 18624

3

Limnoodrilus sp

3

Cyclops sp.

150

Daphnia sp.
Niphargus valachicus Dobreanu & Manolache,
1933
Asellus aquaticus (Linnaeus, 1758)

50

1

22

36

40

Ostracoda

12

11

6

120

4
5

1
2

7

5

1

4

110

35

50

41

33

35

2

1

6

Planorbarius corneus (Linnaeus, 1758)

17Viviparus viviparus (Linnaeus, 1758)

18

Hydrobiidae

15

2

11

Hygromiidae

20

16

4

Oxyloma elegans (Risso, 1826)

1

9

Dytiscidae

2

10

Tipula sp.

911

Chironomus sp.

2

12

Ceratopogonidae

1

Trichoptera

1

13

Hemiptera

1

14

Notonecta glauca (Linnaeus, 1758)

1

Collembola

2

Milipaeda

8

1

1
4

1

2
2

4

1

1

276
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Ord.
no.

Number or recorded species according to thesampling site

Types/taxa

SW2
15

Argyroneta aquatica (Clerck, 1758)

1

16

Hydrachnidia

1

SW3

SW4

SW2
1

Based on the results of the research of the communities of aquatic macro invertebrates in thewider area of the landfill in Vinča, indicative ecological the status of the water bodies at locations
SW1 and SW5 can be characterized as poor (Class V), in accordance with all parametersprescribed by the Rulebook on Parameters of Ecological and Chemical Status of Surface Waters
and Parameters of Chemical and Quantitative Status of Groundwaters (Official gazette of RS,
No. 74/2011). It should be noted that it is intentionally stated as indicative since the statusassessment procedure requires a larger number of samples and, according to the law, is not the
subject of individual studies for projects of this type. Water bodies represented by the samples
from the locations SW1 and SW5 can be defined as artificial and consequently, their indicative
ecological potential can be characterized as poor.
Indicative ecological status of standing water body, in accordance with the results obtained forsamples taken from locations SW2, SW3, SW4 and SW6, can also be assessed as poor, in
accordance with applicable Regulation.
In the campaign launched in June 2018, the apparent similarity of the communities is present inboth ponds, i.e., to both selected sampling points (SW3, SW4, June 2018).
The dominant species in the community are larvae of insects, mainly Diptera larvae that make up
about 90%. The mosquito larvae (Culex sp.) and the hover fly (Eristalis sp.) were the mostcommon. Other insect groups include Hemiptera and Coleopteran from the Dytiscidea andHidrophilide families, with representatives typical of standing water that are under severe organic
pollution. Cleon dipterum (Ephemeroptera) was also recorded on both locations, while one
damselfly larva Ishnura elegans (Odonata / Zygoptera) was recorded at the SW4 site at the larger
pond.
Indicative ecological status of these standing waters can be assessed as poor, in accordance with
the Rulebook on parameters of ecological and chemical status of surface waters and parametersof chemical and quantitative status of groundwater ("Official Gazette of RS", No. 74/2011).
Table 42. Results of the analysis for the presence of macro invertebrates in the surface waters in the landfill
area, June 2018

Number of recorded species according to the sampling site
Ord. no.

Types/taxa
SW3

1

SW4

Crustacea277_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Number of recorded species according to the sampling site
Ord. no.

2

Types/taxa
SW3

SW4

Cyclops sp.

53

Ostracoda

1

1

1

0

5

3

Corixa sp.

4

5

Mesovelia sp.

1

1

Velia sp.

11Plea lechi

21Agabus sp.

2

3

Hidrophilidae ad22

Hidrophilidae Lv

4

4

Coelostoma sp.

1

1

Cercion laminatus11

Laccophilus sp.

1

1

Helochares sp.

11

Eristalis pupae

23Eristalis sp.

23

20

Ephidridae pupae

42Dichaeta caudata

2

3

Culex sp.

190

220

Ceratopogonidae

11Chironomus sp.

45

Hydracarina

11

OdonataIschnura elegans

3

Ephemeroptera
Cleon dipterum

4

5

6

7

Hemiptera

Coleoptera

DipteraFrom all of the above, it can be concluded that it is necessary to continue the monitoring of thestatus in the aforementioned water bodies, for the purpose of achieving the target ecologicalpotential class i.e. maximum ecological potential which can be achieved in the given water
bodies.

278_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

5.4. SOIL
The soil pollution testing programme in the territory of Belgrade in 2017 was performed by theCity Institute of Public Health Belgrade based on the Contract entered into with the City
Secretariat for Environmental Protection.
During the implementation of the soil pollution testing programme in the territory of Belgrade in2017, sampling and laboratory testing was carried out on a total of 48 soils samples.
In accordance with the testing target and bearing in mind the purpose and manner of soil use, thesoil pollution testing programme in the territory of Belgrade in 2017 focused on the following
testing areas:
I Soil in the area of sanitary protection of the central water supply source area in the territoryof Belgrade – 12 sites
II Soil in agricultural areas – 3 sites
III Soil in the vicinity of large traffic routes – 2 sites IV Soil in public areas and within nonhygienic settlements – 7 sites
On all sites sampling was done from the depth of 0.10 and 0.50m.
During the sampling, a composite sample was formed at each site and depth, obtained bycapturing soil from 3 different locations on the surface of around 20-30m².
Laboratory testing was performed in accordance with the provisions of the ISO 17025:2006
Standard, and the overcount and interpretation of results in accordance with the Regulation on
the Programmme of Systematic Monitoring of Soil Quality, Indicators for Assessment of the
Risk of Land Degradation (“Official gazette”, no. 88/2010).
According to the results of performed testing of the soil composition at 24 sites in the territory ofBelgrade (Source: Environmental quality in Belgrade for 2017, City administration, Secretariat
for Environmental Protection, 2018), in the surface soil layer (up to 50 cm), there is an increased
concentration of certain testing parameters.
Taking into account all results of soil pollution testing in the territory of Belgrade, most of thedeviations referred to increased nickel content in the soil (in 40 out of 48 analyzed samples)compared to the limit values according to the Regulation (“Official gazette”, no. 88/2010).
The finding of increased nickel content in the soil is in reference with the specific geochemicalcomposition of surface soil layers in this area and in most cases was not dominantly caused bycontamination of antropogenous origin. This may be concluded based on the analysis of a large
number of samples and multi-annual monitoring of soil pollution in the observed area, given thatsimilar concentrations of nickel are recorded in most of the tested samples within the General
Plan of the City. There is also a similar situation in other areas outside the territory of the City ofBelgrade(Smederevo,Požarevacetc.).
279_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Considering the fact that soil contamination by means of nickel is possible due to the impact ofindustry, thermal power complex, traffic, utility services etc., we cannot completely exclude theantropogenous impact.
Causes of greater concentration of other metals: copper (32 samples), zink (13 samples), arsenic(3 samples), chrome (2 samples) and lead and cadmium (1 sample of each) should be searchedin the harmful impact of the environment, mostly as a consequence of purposes and activities inthe direct vicinity of sampling locations (point source contamination) and/or air pollution(diffusion of polluting substances).
Recorded increased content of organic parameters: total hydrocarbons (C 10 -C 40 ) (9 samples) andpolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (2 samples) is not so significant regarding the establishedconcentrations and sites, but indicates that its presence in the soil requires further monitoring,considering the long period of semi-decay and other important ecotoxicological characteristics(possible inclusion into the food chain, harmful health effects etc.).
The present number of recorded deviations of heavy metal content (first of all nickel) and otherpollutants in the soil in the territory of Belgrade can, other than the antropogenous harmful
effect, be in reference with the implementation of the Regulation (“Official gazette”, no.
88/2010). This Regulation introduces the procedure of establishing – calculating the limit andremediation value for each tested parametre, based on the content of organic matter and clay.
Considering that the aforesaid regulation was completely copied from the Dutch legislation, thenatural characteristics of soil composition in our territory were not taken into account. The
consequence of that was an unreasonable reduction of the limit and remediation value for sometested parameters, which also resulted in the fact that almost all tested soil samples have a greaternickel content. The above situation hampers the assessment of the actual contribution of soil
pollution in a certain territory/site.
Within the zone of sanitary protection of the central water supply source area deviations in termsof concentration of tested parametres were recorded on 3 sites. Those sites are: Water Supply
Mladenovac – well B10, Serava Source; Water Supply Obrenovac – well No.2 “Vić Bare” andWater Supply Lazarevac – well B10.
In soil samples taken from agricultural areas as well as in the area of large traffic routes impact,
no significant deviations were recorded in 2017 compared to the current Regulation standards.
Investigations performed in public areas showed that there were no significant deviations in thecontent of tested soil parameters within the Protected natural area of Avala – near the Avala
tower and in the vicinity of “Planinarski dom Čarapića brest”.
Contrary to that, at the sites of 3 unhygienic settlements: Jabučki rit, in Vuka Vrčevića Street atČukarička padina, there are exceeded limits of a large number of tested pollutants, mostly heavy
metals, some of which have, in addition to the limit value, also exceeded the remediation value.
280_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Most of the deviations were recorded in the soil at the site in Vuka Vrčevića Street, where the limit
values were exceeded in concentrations of: Pb, Zn, Cu, Ni, total hydrocarbons C 10 -C 40 and polycyclicaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). Thereby, concentrations of zink (Zn), and copper (Cu) in sample 1017-0040 (h=10cm), in addition to exceeding the limit values, have also exceeded the remediation
value.
Significant exceedance of the remediation value for arsenic (As) was also recorded in both samples 1710-0042 and 17-10-0043 (h=10 and 50cm) at the site of the unhygienic settlement Čukarička padina.
In addition to arsenic, the limit value was also exceeded in concentrations of Cd, Zn, Cu, Ni and totalhydrocarbons C 10 -C 40 .
At the site of the unhygienic settlement Jabučki rit there was a greater content of Zn, Cu, Ni and of
total hydrocarbons C10-C40, whereby concentration of copper (Cu) in sample 10-17-0032 (h=50cm),
in addition to exceeding the limit values, have also exceeded the remediation value. At the site of theunhygienic settlement there was also a greater content and total hydrocarbons, whereby concentrationof copper in the sample, in addition to exceeding the limit values, have also exceeded the remediation
value.
The above deviations of pollutants which have exceeded the limit value, some of which alsosignificantly exceed the remediation value, indicate at the sites of unhygienic settlements that the soilat the referent sites is significantly affected by the antropogenous impact, namely exposed to thepresence of hazardous and harmful substances concerning the way of using and and arranging the soil.
In the specific case the finding can be in correlation to the use of soil for the purpose of disposal ofcollected secondary raw materials and waste which is unproperly collected and disposed of on the soil
(with no protective measures), with the application of procedures of partial waste processing or
treatment through inadequate procedures.
Baseline testing results
Within the scope of ascertaining the baseline for environment quality parameters, before thecommencement of works on the construction of planned facilities, soil and sediment quality
determination was performed in the wider area of the Vinča complex (Source: ESIA, Egis, ver. 03).
Sampling was performed on 29th March 2018 by the Anahem laboratory from Belgrade, at 10
measurement locations - 7 for the soil and 3 for the sediment. Analysis of the samples, for determining
physical-chemical and microbiological parameters was performed by the same laboratory, where thetesting for the presence of asbestos, on 5 out of a total of 10 locations, was performed by the Mol
Institute laboratory from Stara Pazova. Moreover, Egis performed specific sampling investigation inorder to perform sampling points SS3 * and SS6 * of additional soil for specific analyses(Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins PCDD and polychlorinated dibenzofurans PCDF ), and the analysis
was performed by the International accredited Alcontrol laboratory (currently Sinlab).
281_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Fig.114 Spatial view of locations for sampling of soil and sedimentFig. translation: Surface soil 1,2,3,4,6,7,8
Surface soil 5,9,10 (sludge)
Table 43 Basic data on sampling sites - soil and sedimentOrd.no.

Measurement site
identification

Sample typeGPS coordinates
N 44° 47’ 10.30’’
E 20° 35’ 21.20’’
N 44° 47' 18.20''
E 20° 35' 31.20''
N 44° 47' 31.20''
E 20° 35' 11.10''
N 44° 47' 20.78''
E 20° 36' 00.98''
N 44° 47' 20.05''
E 20° 36' 17.31''
N 44° 47' 06.15''
E 20° 36' 13.60''
N 44° 46' 54.03''
E 20° 35' 49.80''
N 44° 46' 54.05''
E 20° 35' 36.58''
N 44° 47' 16.37''
E 20° 36' 41.02''
N 44° 47' 08.99''
E 20° 36' 35.72''

1

Surface soil 1

Soil

2

Surface soil 2

Soil

3

Surface soil 3

Soil

4

Surface soil 4

Soil

5

Surface soil 5, sludge

6

Surface soil 6

Soil

7

Surface soil 7

Soil

8

Surface soil 8

Soil

9

Surface soil 9, sludge

Sediment

10

Surface soil 10, sludge

Sediment

Sediment

Performed testing forthe presence ofasbestos
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO

282
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________All soil and sediment samples were subjected to the same analysis. Two samples of soil of the
15th of March were subjected to analysis of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans.
The table below shows all compounds analyzed in soil and sediment samples.
Table 44 List of analyzed compounds
Sample reference

Analyzed compounds

Metals, chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOC), polychlorinated aromatic
Points SS1 – SS4, SS7 – compounds (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), volatile hydrocarbons C 5 -C 10 ,benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, xylenes (BTEX), bromides, nitrates, fluorides, chlorides,
SS9sulphates.
Points SS3* and SS6* Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins PCDD and polychlorinated dibenzofurans PCDF 2

The table below shows the results for compounds whose concentration is above thequantification determination value (> LV), while the gray colour indicates concentrations thatexceed the detection threshold.

2

Taking into account the wind rose and topography, it is assumed that great amounts of smoke
caused by fire have a greater impact on the area with SS3 and SS6, considering the fact that the
points of measurement are far from traffic routes which could be the source of such pollutants.
283_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Parametre
Dry matter, %Organic matter,%
Mineral oil,

mg/kg
pH

Table 45 Results of sediments analysis
Sample identification and respective MACs
1
82

* MAC

2
77

* MAC

3
76

* MAC

4
82

* MAC

6
82

* MAC

7
80

* MAC

8
80

* MAC

3.4

-

5,5

-

4.8

-

4.6

-

3.5

-

4.2

-

5.1

-

<10

501; 50002<10501; 50002<10501; 50002<10501; 50002<10501; 50002<10501; 50002<10501; 50002

6.9

-

7,1

-

7.3

-

7.4

-

7.2

-

7.3

-

7.2

-

0.731;112
291;552
1121;4262
0.311;102
361;1922
411;2462
861;5342
1501;7712

0.45
2.9
37
0.07
15
45
13
45

0,711;112
291;552
1141;4332
0,311;102
361;1922
421;2522
861;5332
1511;7782

0.53
3.9
30
0.05
14
31
15
43

0,721;112
291;552
1121;4262
0,311;102
361;1912
411;2462
851;5312
1491;7682

0.57
4.2
39
0.04
16
42
16
45

0.761;112
311:582
1181;4482
0.321;112
381;2032
441;2642
891;5562
1601;8212

Metals, mg/kg
Cadmium (Cd)Arsenic (As)Chrome (Cr)
Mercury (Hg)
Copper (Cu)Nickel l (Ni)Lead (Pb)
Zinc (Zn)

0.56
4.5
49
0.04
41
35
17
56

0.721; 112
301;562
1161;4412
0.321;112
371;1942
431;2582
851;5392
1541;7922

0,60
5,1
68
0,08
29
78
20
55

0,761;112
301;5821161;4412
0,321;112
381;2012
431;2582
891;5522
1571;8092

0.56
4.8
58
0.13
24
71
19
52

0.731;112
291;552
1121;4262
0.311;102
361;1922
411;2462
861;5342
1501;7712

0.44
3.4
31
0.19
15
35
12
38

Other compounds

HC C 5-10 ,mg/kg
CVOC (sum),
mg/kg
Bromides,,Chlorides i,

<0.15

-

<0.15

-

<0.15

-

<0.15

-

<0.15

-

<0.15

-

<0.15

-

<0.22

-

<0.22

-

<0.22

-

<0.22

-

<0.22

-

<0.22

-

<0.22

-

<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
340
6.3
316
24
33
19
28
Fluorides,
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
Nitrates, mg/kg
16
47
33
20
67
39
26
Sulfates, mg/kg
39
5.6
171
12
19
7.6
13
* Based on the Regulation оn the Limit Values of Polluting, Harmful and Dangerous Substances in Soil Regulation, Annex 1, “Official Gazette RS” No.30/2018 (1-MACs, 2remediation values of hazardous and harmful substances)284_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Surrounding soil sample analysis has shown that, according to the Regulation on the
Programme for Systematic Monitoring of Soil Quality, Indicators for Assessing the Risks
from Soil Degradation and Methodology for Developing Remediation Programmes,
Appendix 3 (“Official Gazette”, no. 88/2010):-

Measured copper concentration exceeds the limit value at the site 1 (Surface soil 1),
located on the northwest boundary of the landfill complex;-

Measured nickel concentration exceeds the limit values in the soil samples taken atsites 2, and 3 (Surface soil 2, Surface soil 3) located on the northwest boundary ofcomplex and site 6 (Surface soil 6), located on the southeast of complex;-

Measured concentrations of all studied parameters do not exceed remediation
concentration values of hazardous and harmful substances in the soil;-

Presence of asbestos was not detected in any of the analyzed soil and sediment
samples.

The analysis of samples SS3* and SS6* shows relatively low concentrations ofdibenzodioxins (<56 ng/kg) and dibenzofurans (<35.1 ng/kg). The Regulation on the
Programme of Systematic Monitoring of Soil Quality, Indicators for Assessment of the Risk
of Land Degradation and the Methodology for Development of Remediation Programmes
defines the Remediation value for dioxin concentration (1 μg/kg) in soil. If taken into accountfor the sum of dioxins (<0.056 μg/kg), this value is not exceeded in any of the soil samples.
As for the sediment analysis, the table on the following page shows the results forcompounds whose concentration is above the determination value The table below shows theresults for compounds whose concentration is above the quantification determination value(> LV), while the gray colour indicates concentrations that exceed the detection threshold.
The analysis of sediment samples showed that, in accordance with the Regulation on limit
values of pollutants in surface water, groundwater and sediments and deadlines for theirachievement (Official Gazette of RS, No. 50/2012), in accordance with the limit values for
sediment quality assessment when thrown from waterways:- Measured nickel concentration in sample 9 (surface 9 – sediment) and 10 surface
sediment – sediment) exceed the target values to a small extent. Based on the clearly defined
criteria for sediment quality assessment from the Regulation, it was ascertained that the
sediment was slightly polluted. In accordance with the definitions given in this Regulation, its
disposal is permitted during its dislocation without any special protective measures within the
strip 20 m wide in the vicinity of the watercourse.
- Measured concentrations of pollutants in the sediment 5 sample (surface soil – sediment)
are on the level of the natural telephone, so that the referent sediment can be dislocated without
any special protective measures.
285_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-

286_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Presence of asbestos was not detected in any of the analyzed soil and sediment
samples.
Table 46 Results of sediments analysis
Parameter
Dry matter, %Sample identification and respective MACs
* MAC
9
* MAC
10
* MAC
78
78

5
68
5.3

5.4

Organic matter, %Mineral oils, mg/kg
pH
Cadmium (Cd)Arsenic (As)Chrome (Cr)
Mercury (Hg)
Copper (Cu)Nickel l (Ni)Lead (Pb)
Zinc (Zn)-Bromides, mg/kg
Chlorides, mg/kg
Fluorides, mg/kg
Nitrates, mg/kg
Sulfates, mg/kg-<10501; 50002<10501; 50002<10501; 50002

7.6
0.41
2.4
43
0.09
15
31
13
40
<0.15

0,681; 102
261;492
941;3572
0,281;9,42
211;1662
321;1922
771;4822
1241;6372

7.6
0.46
3.7
53
0.12
25
35
16
64
<0.15

0,6619,92
251;472
881;3342
0,271;9,12
301;1562
291;1742
741;1642
1151;5922

6.9
0.53
2.2
36
0.14
26
49
18
59
<0.15

0.741;112
301;572
1181;4482
0.321;112
381;2002
441;2642
881;5492
1581;8132

HC C 5-10 , mg/kg

CVOC (sum), mg/kg

4.1
-

-

<0.22
<0.05
623
<0.05
55
368

-

-

<0.22
<0,. 5
921
<0.05
1685
136

-

-

<0.22
<0.05
80
<0.05
40
34

-

* Regulation оn the Limit Values of Polluting, Harmful and Dangerous Substances in Soil Regulation, Annex 1,“Official Gazette RS” No.30/2018 (1-MACs, 2-remediation values of hazardous and harmful substances).

287_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

5.5. FAUNA AND FLORA
Flora and flora habitats
Based on the field surveys on biodiversity conducted in April 2018 (Environmental baseline
survey for the Vinča landfill location, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia, DVOKUT – ECRO ltd.
June 2018) the following habitats were found within the project area:
Anthropogenic habitants:- Landfill body;- Leachate channels and ponds;
Other anthropogenic habitat types:- Semi-natural (extremely modified) habitats:- Intermittent streams;
Natural habitats:- Subcontinental shrubs;- Subcontinental shrubs and temperate grassland in mosaic distribution.
Habitats of the landfill surrounding area (planned project buffer area) are:
- Anthropogenic habitats:. Agricultural habitat types. Other anthropogenic habitat types.
- Natural habitats:. Freshwater ponds (oxbow ponds) with associated riparian vegetation;. Alluvial forests;. Oak forests.
Distribution of all detected habitats is shown on the figure below.

288_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 115 Habitats map created based on the data obtained during the biodiversity fieldsurvey.
Habitats on landfill body
The body of the landfill was created during decades of waste disposal. Part of the landfill isstill active, other parts are partially covered by inert waste/soil. Vegetation, consisting mostlyof various grass species (Poaceae spp.), ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.), broadleaf
plantain (Plantago major L.), shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.) and fieldmustard (Brassica rapa L.) has started to overgrow older parts of the landfill.
Leachate channels and ponds
Leachate channels and pond are located around the landfill body and they cover a relatively
small area. In a few locations small reed bed patches, i.e. patches of Scirpo-Phragmitetum
Koch 1926 association vegetation has succeeded to develop.
Vegetation on their edges contains curly dock (Rumex crispus L.), cleavers (Galium aparineL.), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum L.), field mustard (Brassica rapa L.), whitetop(Lepidium draba L.) and grasses (Poaceae spp.)
Agricultural habitats
In the landfill surrounding area, large plots of land are used for vegetable and fruit production.
Some of the plots have since been abandoned, so there are four types of habitats:- orchards – where different fruit tree species have been detected: apple (Malus pumila
Miller), apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), cherry (Prunus avium L.), sour cherry (Prunus
cerasus L.), plum (Prunus domestica) and pear (Pyrus communis L.);- abandoned orchards, where trees have been cut down or removed, and are slowly being
overgrown;- arable land and- abandoned arable land that is in different stages of succession.
Within the project area, most of the agricultural land is abandoned, however several orchards
are still used (south of the landfill body). These habitats, especially those still being
maintained, are under extreme human influence due to the activities that are being performed.
Apart from selective planting, some areas are maintained by setting fires or by applying
herbicides, as the survey has shown. This is emphasised since these practices can have negative
impacts on adjacent habitats.
Other anthropogenic habitats
This habitat type includes various anthropogenic habitats that cover negligible areas and are
not important for maintaining biodiversity of the region. This also includes other landfill
infrastructure, roads and field paths, landfill buildings and manipulative surfaces. These arepoorly permeable or unvegetated areas.
289_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Nearby asphalt plant and a minor peacock rearing facility (yard) are also included in thishabitat type. Landscaping around landfill buildings has introduced into the environment
different plants of some horticultural value, e.g. conifers. Along paths and roads nitrophilic
ruderal vegetation is formed, characterized by tall herbaceous greens: stinging nettle (Urtica
dioica L.) and curly dock (Rumex crispus L.).
Intermittent streams
Ošljanski potok (Ošljan stream) was classified in this study as an intermittent stream based ondata obtained from the topographic map (1:25 000) of the Republic of Serbia. Ošljanski potok(Ošljan stream) originates under the landfill and merges with leachate water. Due to this, its
riparian vegetation is very similar to that of the drain channels. Riparian vegetation consists oftall herbaceous greens, characteristic for nutrient enriched or disturbed soil: curly dock (Rumex
crispus L.), cleavers (Galium aparine L.), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum L.), greater
burdock (Arctium lappa L.), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.). Ošljanski potok (Ošljan stream)is without aquatic vegetation. Near the inflow into Ošljanska bara (Ošljan pond) thickets of aninvasive species false indigo-bush (Amorpha fruticosa L.) have developed.
Subcontinental deciduous shrubs
Subcontinental deciduous shrubs are the most widespread natural habitat in the planned project
area. They developed because earlier land use was abandoned, which which may be concluded
from the terraced, now overgrown slopes. Here succession led to grassland development,
followed by development and spreading of low bushes, and in the later stages by formation ofwell-developed shrubs. Depending on the location they developed as thick, impassable stands
or thickets, or as less dense stands in an interchange with grassland.
The species composition is mainly homogeneous, dominantly composed of common dogwood(Cornus sanguinea L.), midland hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata (Poir.) DC.) and blackthorn(Prunus spinosa L.). West from the landfill the vegetation of shrubs is very dense, and it hascompletely covered the land disabling the establishment of other plant species and inhibiting
larger animals’ migration. Other higher shrub species present such as common hawthorn(Crataegus monogyna Jacq.), field rose (Rosa arvensis Huds.) and common barberry(Berberis vulgaris L.) were present in variable percentages. Stands of blackberries Rubus spp.
are also regularly present. Occasionally smaller individuals of tree species such as black elder(Sambucus nigra L.), common hazel (Corylus avellana L.) and Turkey oak (Quercus cerrisL.). Invasive species false indigo-bush (Amorpha fruticosa L.) and black locust (Robinia
pseudacacia L.) were significantly present at all sites. In some smaller fragments black locust
dominated over shrub vegetation (e.g. north from the landfill).
Subcontinental deciduous shrubs / Pannonian grasslands
In the area south-west from the landfill, where shrubs are less dominant, and grassland, suchas cat grass (Dactylis glomerata L.), false oat-grass (Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) P.Beauv. ex
J.Presl & C.Presl) and common meadow-grass (Poa pratensis L.) has greater cover. Some of290_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

the other present species were curly dock (Rumex crispus L.) and white clover (Trifolium
repens L.).
Freshwater wetlands (oxbow ponds) with associated riparian vegetation
One such habitat consists of the Ošljan oxbow ponds (Ošljanske bare), located approximately
600 m from the landfill site.
These freshwater ponds are still partially connected to the Danube River, and their water isrefreshed during periods of high water levels. This is important because of the fact that
impacts of the leachate water inflows can be periodically mitigated, at least to an extent.
During the field survey, high Danube water levels made oxbow ponds difficult to access,which hindered possibilities for a thorough vegetation analysis.
Ošljan ponds include large areas of Scirpo-Phragmitetum (Koch 1926) associated vegetation.
Namely, rather large reed beds composed of Phragmites australis were noticed during thesurvey. These reed habitats are extremely important for maintaining biodiversity, being
favourable habitats for wetland birds.
Reed beds are better developed in areas further away from the mouth of the Ošljan stream(Ošljanski potok). In the area of the oxbow pond near the mouth of the stream, there are dense
thickets of invasive species called false indigo-bush (Amorpha fruticosa L.).
Alluvial forests
An alluvial forest in the survey area is located in the buffer zone around the Ošljan Pond.
Vegetation class Salicetea purpureae Moor 1958 contains riparian willow scrub and willowpoplar forests distributed along rivers – on river islands, river banks, and along otherfreshwater bodies (e.g. marshes, lakes). They are not biogeographically determined. Instead,they are uniform throughout Europe, determined by the period of the year their root systems
are fully submerged underwater. The dominant species are white willow (Salix alba L.), silver
poplar (Populus alba L.), cottonwood poplar (Populus nigra L.) and grey poplar (Populus x
canescens (Aiton) Sm.). Scrub and forest patches are alternating around the Ošljan pond.
Invasive plant species
The planned project area was characterized by the presence of invasive plant species: black
locust (Robinia pseudacacia), false indigo-bush (Amorpha fruticosa), and tree of heaven(Ailanthus altissima). Old (at least ten years old) and young specimens (sprouts) were bothfound. Copses of black locust have, at times, completely suppressed local vegetation (e.g. near theasphalt plant and in place of some shrubs). False indigo-bush was homogenously present in areas
with subcontinental deciduous shrubs and had a significant presence in grassland fragments. Treeof heaven specimens have spread mostly near forest paths, but have been found in other habitats
as well. Young plants of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) were found only in one
location, near the northern edge of the landfill. As this species is known for its rapid dispersal
over disrupted environments, its population is probably in the early stages of the local invasion.
291_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Close to the Ošljan stream, in the buffer zone, a few specimens of honey locust (Gleditsia
triacanthos) were also found. This species has already been detected in Serbia, and it isoccasionally locally invasive. Its invasions are especially successful in alluvial forests. Due tothe considerable habitat degradation in the wider area, this species can be assumed to have astrong invasive potential. In the area of the oxbow pond near the mouth of the Ošljan stream(in the project buffer zone), dense thickets of an invasive species false indigo-bush havedeveloped.
Above discussed invasive species: black locust (Robinia pseudacacia), false indigo-bush(Amorpha fruticosa), tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and common ragweed (Ambrosia
artemisiifolia) were declared highly invasive in Serbia. Disrupted natural environments (suchas abandoned agricultural land, abandoned grasslands, polluted land) are sensitive to invasion,
which means that an even more rapid dispersion and population growth of these organisms canbe expected in the future, which would represent a threat to local biodiversity.
Oak forests
In the surrounding area of the landfill, oak forests are today not extensively developed, andcover limited fragments and include considerable areas of forest edges, which fall under the
category of shrub habitat described above. They are located to the south-east from the landfill.
The most determinative tree species is Turkish oak (Quercus cerris L.), but the following
elements are prevalent (mixed forest): field maple (Acer campestre L.), common hazel(Corylus avellana L.), common dogwood (Cornus sanguinea L.), perfoliate honeysuckle(Lonicera caprifolium L.), blackberry (Rubus spp.), field elm (Ulmus minor L.). Similarly toother habitats, invasive species, such as black locust (Robinia pseudacacia L.). are present inthis habitat.
Fauna and fauna habitats
During the field survey (Environmental baseline survey for the Vinča landfill location,
Belgrade, Republic of Serbia, DVOKUT – ECRO ltd. June 2018), wild boar traces (of digging
in the mud) were found in the southern part of the planned project area of the Vinča landfill.
Preferable habitats for this species are well-developed forests. This indicates that individuals
occasionally use this area as a feeding ground.
The landfill provides a very good shelter and food source for large populations of various smallrodents, such as mice (Mus spp., Apodemus spp.) and rats (Rattus spp.). The population ofbrown rat is dominant at the landfill over the native species of black rat. Large numbers ofsmall mammals (mice and common voles) are present throughout the study area (within theplanned project area and the buffer zone).
Substantial populations of small rodents are main food source of beech marten (Martes foina),
which has been observed hunting at the southern border of the current landfill.
The most densely distributed species of reptiles was the common wall lizard (Podarcis
muralis). These lizards are very easily spotted at sites under direct sunlight, such as natural and292_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

artificial surfaces without vegetation. They were usually present in groups of up to fivespecimens. A dense common wall lizard population was found in the planned project area, as
well as in the buffer zone.
This pattern depends on the large diversity of insects associated with the landfill (such as thoseof the species Diptera), as they are an important food source for lizards. Another reptile
species in the planned project area was the European green lizard (Lacerta viridis), a species
that preferers natural habitats such as shrubs and thickets.
The landfill provides adequately sheltered and wet habitats for species of millipedes (Julidaesp.) and land isopods such as the rough woodlouse (Porcellio scaber). Populations of snails of
the family Helicidae were often found in places overshadowed by vegetation. Various spider
webs were found in areas covered by shrubs. A typical representative species is the nursery
web spider (Pisaura mirabilis).
The most common and largest group of insects at the landfill were Diptera families Muscidae,
Calliphoridae, and Sarcophagidae. The Diptera larval stages, known as maggots, were theonly invertebrates present in landfill leachate pools and the Ošljan stream. This indicates a
substantial resilience of these organisms to water pollution.
The whole survey area, especially around Ošljan oxbow ponds, is inhabited by a large anddiverse population of Diptera family mosquitoes (Culicidae).
The second largest group of insects at the landfill, next to the Diptera order, were cockroaches(Blattodea), represented by two species: German cockroach (Blatella germanica) and Oriental
cockroach (Blatella orientalis), which were very easy to detect at the landfill and around it,
within the planned project area.
Various flowering herbaceous plants and flowering bushes provide food for insects feeding on
nectar. Nine species of butterflies are present at the site, belonging to the following families:
Hesperiidae, Nymphalidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Lycaenidae, Erebidae and Hesperiidae.
A common beetle found on flowering plants was the green rose chafer (Cetonia aurata). The
order of Hymenoptera was represented by Apidae and Vespidae, with a considerable
domination of the wester honey bee (Apis mellifica). Some specimens of this order are also
found at the body of the landfill.
The order of Hemiptera was represented by three species from the families Pyrrhocoridae andPentatomidae. The most dominant species of this order was fire bug (Pyrrhocoris apterus),
which was very easy to detect due to its bright colour and specific behaviour (specimengrouping).
The small fragments of grasslands were inhabited by ants (Formicidae) and nymphs of bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae). The beetles of families Coccinellidae were found at plants whichwere infested with members of parasitic plant mites.
293_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Only two insects connected with wet and aquatic habitats were noted: a single specimen of
spread-winged damselfly (Lestidae) and a single specimen of aquatic beetle (Dytiscidae), butthey were not associated with landfill leachate waters.
During the bird survey of the Vinča landfill, 57 species of birds were identified (Bird survey at“Vinča“ city landfill - Preliminary Report, prepared by Marko Šćiban and Nikola Stanojević
from the Bird Protection and Study Society of Serbia (BPSSS) in April 2018). Some bird
species use the landfill body for foraging and resting, while other species are only flying overthe survey area.

Figure 116 Bird observation points within the planned project area
The most numerous species was Black-Headed Gull (Larus ridibundus), with an estimatedpopulation of around 3,000 specimens at the landfill site. Other common species such as
Caspian/Yellow-legged gull (Larus cachinnans/michahellis), Lesser Blackbacked Gull (Larus
fuscus) and Great Cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) were also identified, but their populations
were considerably smaller.
Gulls (Larus spp.), White Storks (Ciconia ciconia), Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and species
from the Crow family (Corvidae) were present in the vicinity of the landfill personnel andvehicles. Raptor species kept some distance and spent most of their time at parts of the landfill
where waste disposal was not taking place.
The bird population of the Danube River and Ošljan oxbow ponds is characterized by thepresence of wetland species (such as Aythya nyroca, Spatula clypeata, Spatula querquedula,
Mareca strepera, Podiceps nigricollis, Microcarbo pygmaeus).
294_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Flora and fauna species of particular interest - endangered and protected species
For the purposes of an environmental impact assessment study, birds were monitored andstudied in a wider landfill area in Vinča over an entire calendar year, through four campaigns.
Relevant environmental data were collected on locally distributed species and specificities of
the area in question.
A preliminary survey was conducted in April 2018 (Bird survey at “Vinča“ landfill preliminary report, Preliminary Report, Bird Protection and Study Society of Serbia, Novi Sad,
April 2018, by M. Šćiban, N. Stanojević). A number of surveys followed: in
September/October 2018 (Bird survey at the Vinča landfill and its surroundings in Belgrade,during the migration of birds from September to October 2018, Preliminary Report, October
2018, League for Ornithological Action of Serbia, by D. Simić) and in December 2018 (Birdsurvey at the Vinča landfill and its surroundings in Belgrade in December 2018, Preliminary
Report, January 2018, League for Ornithological Action of Serbia, by D. Simić). In October
2018, available literature and field data were summarised in the Overview of previous
sightings of birds at the Vinča landfill and surrounding areas (published by Dragan Simić,
League for Ornithological Action of Serbia).
Monitoring of bird populations continued in May and June 2019 (Survey of the rearing of birds
at the Vinča landfill in Belgrade, May-June 2019, Preliminary Report, July 2019, D. Simić, M.
Raković).
Preliminary survey in April 2018
During the April survey, 56 bird species were identified at the Vinča landfill. Many species
were really using the landfill to foraging and resting, while some other species were only
registered while they were flying over the survey area. The most numerous species was BlackHeaded Gull (L. ridibundus) with an estimated population of over 6,000 specimens observed at
the landfill site, flying and resting at the Danube River (OP6). Three species attracted more
attention than the others: Lesser Blackbacked Gull (L. fuscus), with less than 13 specimens which was one of the largest numbers of this species ever detected at the site (Šćiban at al.,2015); Mediterranean Gull (L. melanocephalus), a species which is believed not to be drawn
by landfills and which has only once been identified on that site; and Black Kite (M. migrans),
a species belonging to the national category of critically imperilled species, with a small
population, out of which 1 or 2 specimens spent a lot of time at the site, indicating a possibilityof mating in the vicinity. A newly identified active nest of White-tailed eagle (H. albicilla) is
located in the buffer zone. Gulls, White storks, Starlings and species from the Crow family
were feeding in the vicinity of landfill personnel and vehicles, while raptor species kept acertain distance and spent most of their time at the parts of the landfill where waste disposal
was not taking place.
Flooded retention basins found between the landfill and the Danube River and the Vinča pond
(Vinčanska bara) had not been previously surveyed, and their importance for migrations ofwater birds has not been determined. During this survey, several rare species and species ofimportance for protection were identified (A. niroca, S. clipeata, S. kuerkuedula, M. strepera,
295_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

P. nigricollis, M. pigmaeus), which indicates the importance of this wetland for preservation of
species.
Survey conducted in September-October 2018
In late September and the first half of October 2018, 47 (+1) species were identified at thelandfill and in the buffer zone, which is defined as an area 1.5 km from the landfill. The mostnumerous were the two dominant species of gulls (Yellow-Legged Gull and Black-HeadedGull), numbering in the thousands, followed by the Common Starling and Common Wood
Pigeon, numbering in lower hundreds, followed by 13 further identified species, ranging from10 to 99 individuals. Further 31 species were identified in the range of 1 to 9 specimens. The
number of White-tailed Eagles was particularly high in the early mornings in the Vinča pond up to 6 specimens. Most of them were observed at too large a distance to be able to determine
their age, but, unlike other birds, who were flying, trying to hunt, or simply flew away, twobirds were sitting by each other’s side, motionless, throughout the observation period, whichsuggested that they were a territorial pair. Although it was very polluted by wastewater fromthe landfill, the Vinča pond is, generally, a place with the most developed biodiversity in thesurvey area, with, inter alia, Mute Swan, Northern Shoveler, Gadwall, Mallard, Eurasian Teal,
Little Grebe, Eurasian Coot, Dunlin, Common Snipe, Marsh Sandpiper, Black-Headed Gull,
Yellow-legged Gull, Pygmy Cormorant, Great Cormorant, Grey Heron, Great White Egret,Little Egret, Eurasian Sparrowhawk, White-tailed Eagle, Common Buzzard, Common Kestrel,
together with various singing birds, including White Wagtail (at the height of its migration, 20
specimens at once) and Water pipit (which is, in Balkans, a species that lives in highmountains, usually above the tree line).
Southeast slopes are characterized by the most diverse habitats, and therefore also the highest
diversity of species. As gulls use that area as a flying corridor (and, to a lesser extent, the Vinča
pond as a resting place), the total number of birds identified in this area is approximate to thenumber identified at the landfill.
The number of species identified at the landfill and the southwest slopes is half or less than halfof the number of those identified on the southwest slopes. In view of the species and theindividual number, the southwest slopes were the poorest part of the surveyed area.
Survey in December 2018
From mid to late December 2018, 31 species were identified at the landfill and in the buffer
zone. The most numerous species was Black-Headed Gull (up to 21,000), followed by YellowLegged Gull, Gull-billed Tern and Caspian Gull, in the lower hundreds, followed by Rook andEurasian Teal, with about 100 specimens. Several winter species deserve particular attention:
Gulls (of all species) as a group which directly uses the landfill, mostly as an area for foraging
and residing; Grey Herons, who have recently multiplied their numbers (5x) and reside at thelandfill; a territorial White-tailed Eagle in the Vinča pond, and many Water pipits, using thepond as their winter habitat.
Survey conducted in May-June 2019296_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

A total of 51 bird species were identified during the survey, out of which 12 are protected, and37 strictly protected in accordance with the national legislation (Strictly protected wild speciesof plants, animals and fungi, 2010/2011). Four out of the identified species have been includedin the Red Book of Fauna of Serbia III – Birds (Radišić et al., 2018.). One of them - European
Turtle Dove - is facing the risk of extinction.
Out of the total of 51 detected species, 36 were recorded as having reproduced, 6 as species
that might reproduce, 22 as likely to reproduce, and, finally, 8 as species confirmed toreproduce. Further 15 species were detected in activities entailing reproduction. A total of 22
breeding pairs were identified. The seven most numerous species together had 156 breedingpairs, or 69,4% of that number. Separately, the two most numerous species, Common
Whitethroat and Common Nightingale, with 78 breeding pairs, constitute over one third or
34.8% of the total number of active nests.

297_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 47. Observed protected and strictly protected bird species and their general distribution within the planned project area
April 2018

Species

Grey Partridge(Perdix perdix)
Common Pheasant(Phasianus
colchicus)
CommonWoodpigeon(Columba
palumbus)
Collared Dove(Streptopelia
decaocto)
White Stork(Ciconia ciconia)
Grey Heron (Ardea
cinerea)
Great Cormorant(Phalacrocorax
carbo)
Black-headed Gull
(Chroicocephalus
ridibundus)

National
protection
status*Body ofthelandfill

West
from
the
body ofthelandfillSouth-west
from thebody of thelandfill

Body ofthelandfillSouth-west
from the bodyof the landfill









December 2018

May
2019

June
2019

Landfill
complexBuffe
r zone(greenbelt)

Landfill
complexLandfill
complex































Body ofthelandfill

PROTECTEDPROTECTEDPROTECTEDPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDPROTECTED









PROTECTEDPROTECTED

South-west
from thebody of thelandfill

September-October 2018























298
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Mediterranean Gull
(Larusmelanocephalus)
Common Gull
(Larus canus)
Lesser Black-backed
Gull (Larus fuscus)Black Kite (Milvus
migrans)
Common Buzzard(Buteo buteo)
Common Kestrel(Falco tinnunculus)
Eurasian Jay(Garrulus
glandarius)
Common Magpie(Pica pica)
Eurasian Jackdaw(Corvus monedula)
Rook (Corvus
frugilegus)
Common Raven(Corvus corax)
Hooded Crow
(Corvus cornix)
Great Tit (Parus
major)
Hooded Crow
(Corvus cornix)
Barn Swallow(Hirundo rustica)
Long-tailed Tit

STRICTLYPROTECTEDPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED











STRICTLYPROTECTED











PROTECTED









PROTECTED









PROTECTEDPROTECTEDPROTECTEDPROTECTED










STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED












































































299
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________(Aegithalos
caudatus)
Common Chiffchaff(Phylloscopus
collybita)
Eurasian Blackcap(Sylvia atricapilla)
Nuthatch (Sitta
europea)
Common Starling(Sturnus vulgaris)
Song Thrush(Turdus philomelos)
Black Redstart(Phoenicurusochruros)
Stonechat (Saxicola
torquata)
Eurasian Tree
Sparrow (Passermontanus)
White Wagtail(Motacilla alba)
Yellow Wagtail(Motacilla flava)
Meadow pipit(Anthus pratensis)
Water pipit (Anthus
spinoletta)
Common Chaffinch(Fringilla coelebs)
Greenfinch(Carduelis chloris)

STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTED








STRICTLYPROTECTED









































STRICTLYPROTECTEDPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED










STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED









300
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Goldfinch(Carduelis spinus)
Linnet (Carduelis
cannabina)
Hawfinch(Coccothraustes
coccothraustes)
Mute Swan (Cygnus
olor)Northern Shoveler(Spatula clypeata)
Gadwall (Mareca
strepera)
Common Quail(Coturnix coturnix)
Mallard (Anasplatyrhynchos)Eurasian Teal (Anascrecca)Little Grebe(Tachybaptus
ruficollis)
Feral Rock Dove
(Columba livia f.
Domestica)
CommonWoodpigeon(Columba
palumbus)
European Turtle
Dove (Streptopelia
turtur)STRICTLYPROTECTED

CommonSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED








PROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED

PROTECTEDPROTECTEDPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTED

PROTECTED

















PROTECTED



















301
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________Whitethroat (Sylvia
communis)
Lesser Whitethroat(Sylvia curruca)
Barred Warbler(Sylvia nisoria)
Common Cuckoo(Cuculus canorus)
Common Swift(Apus apus)
Eurasian Nightjar(Caprimulgus
europaeus)
Eurasian Coot
(Fulica atra)
Dunlin (Calidris
alpina)Common Snipe(Gallinago
gallinago)
Marsh Sandpiper(Tringa stagnatilis)
Black Stork (Ciconia
nigra)
Whiskered Tern
(Chlidonias hybrida)
Yellow-legged Gull
(Larus michahellis)
Caspian Gull (Larus
cachinnans)
Yellowlegged/Caspian Gull
(LarusSTRICTLYPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED


















PROTECTEDPROTECTED302_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
michahellis/cachinnans)Great Black-backed
Gull (Larus marinus)
Pygmy Cormorant(Microcarbo
pygmаeus)
Great White Egret(Ardea alba)
Little Egret (Egretta
garzetta)
Eurasian
Sparrowhawk(Accipiter nisus)
White-tailed Eagle(Haliaeetus albicilla)
Little Owl (Athenenoctua)Long-eared Owl(Asio otus)
European Bee-eater(Merops apiaster)Eurasian Golden
Oriole (Oriolus
oriolus)Eurasian Wryneck(Jynx torquilla)
Great Spotted
Woodpecker(Dendrocopos
major)
Syrian Woodpecker(Dendrocopos

STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED















STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED







303
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
syriacus)
Great Spotted/Syrian
Woodpecker(Dendrocopos
major/syriacus)
Red-backed Shrike(Lanius collurio)
Eurasian Hobby(Falco subbuteo)
Hooded Crow
(Corvus cornix)
Barn Swallow(Hirundo rustica)
Spotted Flycatcher(Muscicapa striata)
European Robin(Erithacus rubecula)Black Redstart(Phoenicurusochruros)Eurasian Blackbird(Turdus merula)
Water Pipit (Anthus
spinoletta)
House Sparrow(Passer domesticus)
Green Sandpiper(Tringa ochropus)
CommonNightingale(Luscinia
megarhynchos)

STRICTLYPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDPROTECTED






















STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTEDPROTECTED

STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED304_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
European Goldfinch(Carduelis carduelis)
European Serin(Serinus serinus)

STRICTLYPROTECTEDSTRICTLYPROTECTED305_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

It is likely that at least some of species observed south-west from the body of the landfill or
west from the body of the landfill nest in the area, such as Grey Partridge (Perdix perdix),Common Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), Magpie (Pica pica), Great Tit (Parus major), Bluetit (Cyanistes caeruleus), Long-tailed Tit (Aegithalos caudatus), Chiffchaff (Phylloscopus
collybita), Blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla), Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), Song Thrush (Turdus
philomelos), Stonechat (Saxicola torquata), Tree Sparrow (Passer montanus), Meadow pipit(Anthus pratensis), Greenfinch (Carduelis chloris), Goldfinch (Carduelis spinus) andHawfinch (Coccothraustes coccothraustes). For other species, such as Great Cormorant(Phalacrocorax carbo), habitats found in this area are not adequate for nesting.
Two protected plant species were detected on the very border of the planned project area - true
comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) and littleleaf linden (Tilia cordata Mill.), and as
individuals. However, two species that are constitutional elements of the shrub habitats foundwithin the planned project area - midland hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata (Poir.) DC.) andcommon hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.) are also protected.

5.6. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE LEVEL
Previously available data
Municipal noise in Belgrade is mainly caused by traffic, while the noise caused by the industry,small businesses, construction and other activities is of minor importance.
In 2017, levels of municipal noise in Belgrade were measured in two cycles, at 35
measurement points located in the city, selected in agreement with the Secretariat forEnvironmental Protection. Measurement points were selected as representative of certain urbanzones of different purposes and along the most important traffic routes. The results showed thatthe measured municipal noise levels in the observed period were high (relative to theprescribed values).
According to the measurement results (Source: Environmental quality in Belgrade in 2017,
City Administration, Secretariat for Environmental Protection, 2018), noise levels at 28 of the
35 sites exceeded the prescribed values (for day, evening and night).
According to the numeration included in the list of noise measurement sites, the measurement
points belong to the following zones:• points # 1, 4, 5, 17, 18, 19, 24, 27, 27, 28 and 31 to the residential zone (noise levels
permitted: day - 55 dB(A), night - 45 dB(A));• points # 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34 i 35 along heavy traffic routes(day - 65 dB(A), night - 55 dB(A));• points 2, 3, 8, 10 i 16 in the city centre zone (day and night - 65 dB(A), night 55 dB(A));• points 7 and 30 in the industrial zone (noise level should correspond to the level
determined for a zone bordering the industrial zone);• point # 27 in the school zone (day and evening 55 dB(A), night 45 dB(A));• point # 13 in the hospital zone (day and evening 50 dB(A), night 45 dB(A));• point # 11 in the recreation zone (50 dB(A) for day, evening and 40 dB(A) for the night).

306_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________First measurement cycle
Residential zone
No
1.
4.
5.
17.
18.
19.
24.
27.
28.
31.

Measuring point
Jurija Gagarina 259
Nemanjina 2
Zahumska 23
Gandijeva 55aRadojke Lakić 15 ulaz II
Pohorska – Pošta Srbije
Stevana Filipovića 32
Ugrinovačka 147
Perside Milenković 1
Hopovska 26

6.
9.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
20.
21.
22.
23.
32.
33.
34.
35.

Daytime
63
62
57
66
50
61
61
63
24
46

Evening
63
61
56
65
48
62
68
61
24
53

Zone of heavy traffic routes
Blagoja Parovića 82
65
Krivolačka – Dž Voždovac
59
Vojvode Mišića 43
65
Vojvode Stepe 66
64
Ustanička – DZ Voždovac
57
Bulevar Despota Stefana
72
122
Zemun – Glavna, Theatre
68“Madlenianum”
Karađorđeva 23
73
Borča – Bele Bartok 26
56
Arsenija Čarnojevića
61
Goce Delčeva 1
66
Mirijevski bulevar 10
65
Nedeljka Gvozdenovića 54
64
Jovana Brankovića
64
Vojvođanska
67

Night
55
57
55
59
40
58
56
58
24
46

64
57
65
64
57
72
67
71
52
58
66
64
64
68
65

307
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.
3.
8.
10.
16.

7.
30.

City centre zone
Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra
67
70
Kraljice Natalije 66
72
Uzun Mirkova –60
Ethnographic Museum
Dalmatinska 1
65
Jug Bogdanova 3
66

67

62

68
59

65
58

66
65

59
59

64

58

55

53

School zone
49

54

24

Hospital zone
Clinical Centre of Serbia
58

56

53

45

38

Industrial zone
Kraljice Jelene 2264“Grmeč” – Republic
58
Geodetic Authority.

Zemun - Gymnasium

13.

11.

Recreation zone
Kalemegdan – Cvijeta
46
Zuzorić Art Pavilion• values exceeding the permitted levels for a specific zone
• values below the permitted levels for a specific zone

During the first measurement cycle in the residential zone, noise exceeded the permitted dayevening-night levels at the majority of measurement points. In this zone, measured levels
exceed the permitted levels: day level by 7 dB(A), evening level by 8 dB(A), and night level by
12 dB(A) on average.
In the zone of heavy traffic routes, where noise is measured at 15 sites, the noise levelexceeded the permitted day level at 8 measurement points, by 2.87 dB(A) on average. In theevening regime, noise levels exceeded limit values by 3.57 dB(A) on average at 7
measurement points. At 12 measurement points, limit values for the night regime were
exceeded by 5.50 dB(A) on average.
At other measurement points by zones (by purposes) where the measured values exceeded thepermitted ones, limit values of day and night noise levels were exceeded by 0.7 dB(A) to 12.6
dB(A).

308_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Second measurement cycle

1.
4.
5.
17.
18.
19.
24.
27.
28.
31.

Residential zone
Jurija Gagarina 259
69
Nemanjina 2
64
Zahumska 23
59
Gandijeva 55a65
Radojke Lakić 15 ulaz II
46
Pohorska – Pošta Srbije
66
Stevana Filipovića 32
61
Ugrinovačka 147
63
Perside Milenković 1
50
Hopovska 26

6.
9.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
20.
21.
22.
23.
32.
33.
34.
35.

57
64
56
69
44
66
61
61
47
5

Zone of heavy traffic routes
Blagoja Parovića 82
68
67
Krivolačka – Dž5858Voždovac
Vojvode Mišića 43
65
65
Vojvode Stepe 66
61
60
Ustanička – DZ
68
66Voždovac
Bulevar Despota Stefana
70
70
122
Zemun – Glavna,
66
65
Theatre “Madlenianum”
Karađorđeva 23
73
72
Borča – Bele Bartok 26
51
50
Arsenija Čarnojevića
66
65
Goce Delčeva 1
65
65
Mirijevski bulevar 10
6564Nedeljka Gvozdenovića
65
63
54
Jovana Brankovića
64
63
Vojvođanska - Surčin
65
63

52
61
53
57
39
61
55
58
42
48

61
52
62
56
61
65
62
68
46
62
59
60
59
59
59

309
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2.
3.
8.
10.
16.

City centre zone
Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra
66
70
Kraljice Natalije 66
66
Uzun Mirkova –60
Ethnographic Museum
Dalmatinska 1
55
Jug Bogdanova 3
67

65

61

65

63

59

58

56
65

51
64

65

63

59

56

School zone
44

44

36

Hospital zone
Clinical Centre of Serbia
58

56

54

46

39

7.
30.

Industrial zone
Kraljice Jelene 22
66“Grmeč” – Republic
63
Geodetic Authority.

27.

Zemun - Gymnasium

13.

11.

Recreation zone
Kalemegdan – Cvijeta
48
Zuzorić Art Pavilion

In the second measurement cycle, the noise level in the residential zone exceeded the permitted
level at 7 measuring points for daytime as well as for evening, while at 8 measuring points thelimit values were exceeded for night time. In this zone, the measured levels are higher thanallowed by an average of 8.85 dB (A) for daytime, 7 dB (A) for evening and 10.75 dB (A) fornight time.
The measurement results show that in the zone along the traffic roads, the noise level was
within the permitted limits at only one measuring point in all three modes, while at 5
measuring points the noise level did not exceed the limit values in the day and evening modes.
Out of a total of 15 measuring points in this zone, the night-time noise level was exceeded at
12 locations by an average of 5.91 dB (A).
In the central parts of the city, noise was within the permissible limits at all measuring points inthe evening mode, while at two locations the measured noise level did not exceed the limit
values in any of the three modes. Noise levels measured in the school and recreation area did
not exceed the limit values.
Based on the deviation of the L day , L evening and L night indicators from the permitted limits bothin the first measurement cycle and in the second cycle during 2017, it is concluded that at alarge number of measurement sites the noise level exceeds the permitted limits relative to theassumed acoustic zone to which it belongs both for the night and for the evening and daytime.
310_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Results of the baseline survey
With the goal of determining the baseline state (Source: ESIA, Egis, ver. 03), before the start ofconstruction works on the planned facilities, noise level monitoring was carried out on thewider area of the Vinča complex. Measurement of noise was performed in March 2018 at 10
measuring points by the City Institute of Public Health in Belgrade, and in accordance withstandard methods and scope of accreditation.
Table 48 Results of the noise level measurement in the wider area of the Vinča landfill complex
Measuring point mark
NM7
NM6
NM4
NM5
ST3
NM1
ST6
ST5
ST2 (1)ST2 (2)ST1 (1)ST1 (2)The measured equivalent noiselevel,
L AeqT [dBA]
65.9
75.1
41.3
44.9
39.3
50.3
51.6
45.9
45.3
48.2
48.5
47.1

Figure 117 Spatial display of measuring points for determining of noise levels in the wider
area of the Vinča landfill complex-

In accordance with the Law on Protection from Noise Pollution in the Environment(“Official Gazette of RS”, No. 36/2009 and 88/2010), the Regulation on noise
indicators, limit values for methods for assessing noise indicators, disturbances andadverse effects of noise in the environment (“Official Gazette of RS”, No. 75/2010) and
the Rulebook on Noise Measurement Methods, Content and Scope of the Noise
Measurement Reports (“Official Gazette of RS”, No. 72/2010), it is estimated that:311_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

-

-

-

-

-

the measured noise level of 66 dB at the measurement point NM7 EXCEEDS the limit
value of 65 dB, in the open air, in the daily and evening mode. According to theRegulation, this measuring site is located in Zone 5 "City center, crafts, commercial,administrative zone with apartments, zone along highways, state and city roads”;
the measured noise level of 54 dB at the measurement site ST6 DOES NOT EXCEED
the limit value of 65 dB, in the open air, in the daily and evening mode. Also, themeasured value of 48 dB at this measuring site DOES NOT EXCEED the limit value of
55 dB in night mode. According to the Regulation, this measuring site is located inZone 5 "City center, craft, commercial, administrative zone with apartments, zone
along the highways, state and city roads”;
the measured noise level of 54 dB at the measurement site ST5 DOES NOT EXCEED
the limit value of 55 dB, in the open air, in the daily and evening mode. Also, themeasured value of 43 dB at this measuring site DOES NOT EXCEED the limit value of
55 dB in night mode. According to the Regulation, this measuring site is located in theZone 3 “Exclusively residential areas”;
the measured noise levels of 51 and 50 dB (48-hour measurement) at the measurementsite ST1 DO NOT EXCEED the limit value of 55 dB, in the open air, in the daily andevening mode. Also, the measured values of 40 and 37 dB at this measuring site DO
NOT EXCEED the limit value of 55 dB in night mode. According to the Regulation,
this measuring site is located in the Zone 3 “Exclusively residential areas”;
reference points NM6, NM5, NM1, ST3 and ST2 are located outside the zoned areas.

5.7. BUILDINGS, IMMOVABLE CULTURAL GOODS,ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES AND AMBIENT UNITS
Within the boundaries of the project, there is a registered archaeological site “Ošljane”, definedas the cultural property, enjoying preliminary protection under the Law on Cultural Heritage.
The Figure below shows the location with the remains of a veteran villa from the Roman
period. The place is in the valley of the Ošljanski potok (Ošljan stream), west of the village
road Vinča - Veliko Selo, on a gentle slope on the right bank of the stream. The location is
known to archaeologists because of accidental discovery of Roman pottery. In 1975 theBelgrade City Museum carried out exploratory excavations of a smaller scope. The
archaeological finds place the remains of this villa in the period from second to third century.
It is also important to note that the location of the archaeological site of Ošljane, in theconditions issued by the Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments, is spatially very
imprecisely displayed, without clearly defined location of the described object of a veteranvilla. The question is where the discovered object is located within the defined zone (Source:
ESIA, Egis, ver. 03).

312_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 118. The spatial position of archaeological site “Ošljane”
on two locations („Zone 1“ and „Zone 2“).

Figure 119 The spatial position of the two locations of magnetometric tests
A map of the distribution of vertical gradations of the total signal for location/Zone 1 wasmade (southwest). By analyzing the map of the high frequency part of the signal, a low changeof the geomagnetic field on the whole surface of location/Zone 1 was discovered. It was
concluded that there are no anomalies that could be relevant to this field of research.
The abovementioned procedures of magnetometric data processing were also applied for thelocation/Zone 2 (northeast), the research field in the northeastern side of the landfill. By
analyzing the map of the high frequency part of the signal, a low intensity of the change of thegeomagnetic field on the whole surface of location/Zone 2 was found. This indicates theabsence of significant anomalies that could be relevant to this field of research.

313_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 120 The total geomagnetic field intensity, Location 2 - northeast

Figure 121 The total geomagnetic field intensity, low-frequent part of the signal, Location 2 northeast
Photogrammetric/morphometric measurements were conducted on March 5, 2017, when it wasmoderately cloudy, which contributed to the high quality of photographs.

314_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 122 Wider zone of landfill in Vinča with displayed drone routes during
photogrammetric measurements
The photogrammetric procedure was also applied, by scanning the surface with a mapping
technique. A drone equipped with a high-resolution camera flew over the broader landfill zone.
During the flight, it shot 1,840 photographss. Through the synthesis of all the photos and theirsoftware processing, the orthophoto image and the 3D model of the wider zone of the landfill
are generated. By analyzing morphometric data, no distinctive forms and anomalies have been
noticed that indicate the existence of archaeological objects on the examined terrain.
Based on the results of geophysical magnetometric and morphometric explorations in in the
Vinča landfill exploration area, it is concluded that there are no anomalies that indicate thepresence of archaeological objects and materials.

315_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

5.8. LANDSCAPE
A 5 km buffer zone can be considered as the narrower area with significance to the subject
project. This is an area of potential significant visual contact with components of the planned
project.

Figure 123 Landscape structure in the 5 km zone
Edge areas of Belgrade suburbs are within a 2-3 km circle. On the west and south side are areasof accentuated urban features (e.g. Kaluđerica, Mirjevo and Vinča). They have a classic
structure of suburban settlements. In the landscape structure prevails a mixture of built
elements, infrastructure and green areas. This is a set of residential and commercial uses,
public green areas, sports and recreational purposes and fragments of the industry. On suburbsedge is contact zone with mosaic rural landscape.
More agricultural character prevails in the Veliko Selo and Slanci which are located on thenorthern part of the buffer zone. They possess a specific landscape pattern which is composedof buildings, greenhouses and agricultural areas. Visual contact with the landfill is prevented
due to the hilly relief, vegetation and microlocation of landfill site.
Danube River is located at the bottom of the slope, about 1 km east from the landfill. Visualcontact from the Danube riverside towards the landfill is largely disabled due to highvegetation. For the Danube landscape, apart from the riverbed, alluvial forests along the coast,
river islands and wet habitats have high importance. River with riverside is a landscapeelement with natural character. They represent a linear element of landscape structure anddistinctive feature of wider area.

316_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________On the east side of Danube River is a large area of intensive agriculture. Landscape image iscomposed of agricultural areas and macadam roads on a flat relief. Urban structures of Starčevo
and Pančevo are settled on a North side. Due to relief flatness significant visual contact isstronger towards hilly area in the West.
Industrial landscape of Pančevo is located outside the 5 km buffer zone and can be described asanthropogenic landscape with strong industrial character. As such is a spatial phenomenon thatcauses negative visual and symbolic connotations
The Vinča landfill complex site is located in the landscape of moderate value. This is a specificagricultural landscape under the strong influence of natural heritage between Belgrade's
periphery and the Danube River. The location of the complex is existing and has elements oflandscape degradation. So it presents a negative visual look that is visible in the immediate
vicinity and from the agricultural territory on the east bank of Danube river.

317_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

6.0. DESCRIPTION OF THE POSSIBLE SIGNIFICANT
IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT ON ENVIRONMENTThis chapter considers the possible impacts of the implementation of the project for theconstruction of a New landfill with accompanying facilities that includes several phases:- the preconstruction phase- construction phase- the phase of regular operation and- other possible risks and impacts

6.1. POSSIBLE IMPACTS DURING THE PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE
The preconstruction phase includes activities such as: collecting baseline data and conducting
investigation works, preparation of the project design, permitting (including obtaining
conditions), setup of the project site (activities on site that precede construction). Due to thetype of the project, no adverse impacts are expected during the preconstruction phase.

6.2. POSSIBLE IMPACTS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE
During the construction phase, local air quality can be impacted by emissions of exhaust gases
from vehicles and machinery used for construction of facilities at the landfill and in the wider
project area (for example, near access roads), construction works (increased dust emissions)and local increase in noise level.
The possible potential impacts and expected impacts are temporally and spatially limited andare of local character.
Surface and underground waters and soil
The possible negative impacts on soil and agricultural land near the site are as follows:-soil degradation during excavation,-

improper disposal of excavated material and land on and around the project site,-discharge of liquid substances (diesel fuel, lubricants) at the construction site fromconstruction machinery or during their maintenance/on-site repairs,-

taking of a larger area of land than necessary.

Negative impacts on soil and agricultural land during construction, such as the discharge ofliquids (diesel fuels, lubricants) due to temporary storage on the construction site or during themaintenance of machinery and vehicles (including fueling), are mainly due to irresponsible
behavior of construction workers and/or inadequate site organization.
If the construction activities are well organized and in accordance with the legal regulations
and conditions required by the competent authorities, soil and agricultural land pollution by
the aforementioned possible negative impacts will be reduced to a minimum.

318_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The construction of a new landfill with accompanying contents may have a negative impact
on water in the event of an accident involving the spillage or leakage of oils and lubricantsfrom vehicles and construction machinery into land and underground layers. These negative
impacts can be prevented by the proper organization of the site and respecting the definedprotection measures.
The project site is located outside the boundaries of water protection (water protection areas
are those where special conditions and prohibitions for protection of drinking water fromharmful impacts have been established) and flood areas which makes this site suitable for all
activities that are part of the project.
The planned area for the construction of the project is located on diluvial deposits (loessdiluvium) which are dusty-clay-sandy composition and have a dense structure and low
permeability and in which smaller quantities of water accumulate periodically. The loessdiluvium that is hypsometrically dominated by parts of the terrain with the function of thehydrogeological aquifer is vertically watertight. In physical-mechanical terms, the material ispoorly consolidated and practically permanently saturated.
Based on investigative works carried out at the project site, it has been established that drilled
sediments have modest filtration characteristics. Due to the dominant presence of pebbly
sediments characterized by low water supply and modest yield, these sediments can be assessedas poorly permeable from the hydrogeological point of view.
Groundwaters were registered on 12 piezometers, and the average relative water levels (depth
from the surface to groundwater) in these piezometers were from 3.40 to 28.00 meters. The
monitoring, which lasted from 25/10/2017 to 30/3/2018, showed that groundwater levels arelower than the disposed waste. (Source: Geological-geotechnical study for engineering andconstruction of a new landfill and rehabilitation of the existing Vinča municipal solid waste
landfill (Energoprojekt Hidroinzenjering a.d., Belgrade, December 2017)).
The location planned for the New Landfill Project is located southwest of the body of the "old"landfill. The nearest piezometers relevant to the New Landfill are NP-2 and BH-5. Levels ofgroundwater in these two piezometers from 25/10/2017 until 30/03/2018, are shown in thefollowing table.
Measured groundwater level
Piezometer

NP-2
BH-5

Earth
depth

201.0
188.0

25/11/2017

01/12/2017

13/12/2017

01/02/2018

189.3
180.0

189.3
180.0

189.2
180.0

189.0
179.9

07/03/2018 30/03/2018

189.0
180.1

188.0
179.4

Absolute
water level
189.2
180.0

(Source: Geological-geotechnical study for engineering and construction of a new landfill andrehabilitation of the existing Vinča municipal solid waste landfill (Energoprojekt
Hidroinzenjering a.d., Belgrade, December 2017)).

During excavation works (the excavation depths of 170.00 masl to 178.00 masl are lower thanthe observed groundwater levels), local underground streams are likely to be found and they
will be temporarily or permanently redirected to a natural recipient.
319_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

During the rainy season, a certain amount of groundwater may occur and possibly cause apartial flooding of the site, if technical measures (such as wall membrane construction) are not
implemented. Therefore, during the construction phase, the impacts of the project on
groundwater and vice versa are to be expected, due to the high levels of groundwater at thesite which should be further examined in the next monitoring.
Flora
The construction of the planned facilities will cause a local but permanent conversion of theexisting anthropogenic habitats and some natural habitats, currently present at these sites,
into the new types of anthropogenic habitats.
Natural habitat types (shrubs, lawns, oak forests ...) are located outside the planned project
area, so that their loss inside the planned project area will not endanger their existence andfavourable status in the wider area.
In the planned project area four protected species of flora, protected by national regulations,are found: true comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.), littleleaf linden (Tilia cordata Mill.),
midland hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata (Poir.) DC), and common hawthorn (Crataegus
monogyna Jacq.). These species are commercial species in Serbia, mostly used for theirphytopharmaceutical properties.
The true comfrey is a widely distributed plant in Europe, including the whole of Serbia.
Within the planned project area, one specimen was found during the drafting of the baseline
study. This plant is typical of various habitats such as wet grasslands, areas near water
streams and wet habitats near paths. Considering the variety of habitats suitable for thisspecies and its wide distribution in Serbia, it can be concluded that the removal of one
specimen found inside the planned project area would not pose a threat to the population of
the true comfrey in Serbia. Still, with the aim of reducing the overall impact of the project, ameasure of relocating this plant to a suitable habitat has been planned as part of the project.
The investigated area is a border area in terms of the distribution of littleleaf linden foundwithin the planned project area, as it is not typical of the Pannonian bio-geographical region,but is widely distributed in most other European bio-geographical regions and in otherlocations in Serbia. During the survey, a single specimen was found within the project area.
Considering the variety of habitats suitable for this species and its wide distribution in Serbia,
it can be concluded that the removal of a single specimen found inside the planned project
area would not pose a threat to the population of the littleleaf linden in Serbia. Still, with theaim of reducing the overall impact of the project, a measure of relocating the tree to asuitable habitat has been planned as part of the project.
The species of midland hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata (Poir.) DC) and common hawthorn(Crataegus monogyna Jacq.) are typically found among the subcontinental deciduous species
inside the project area and the wider area of Vinča landfill. This habitat type is very welldeveloped in the wider area, so the loss of specimens present inside the planned project area
will not significantly endanger the population of these species in Serbia. However, in order tominimize the impact of the project on the abundance of these species, they will be usedduring the formation of a green belt around the project site.
Fauna
320
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

During construction, the existing fauna will be disturbed by noise, vibrations and the frequent
presence of people. As all these types of impacts are already present at the site, thedisturbance will not be changed significantly in relation to the existing condition.
Due to the habitat alteration, the present mammals, reptiles, arthropods (including theprotected species of insects) will change their distribution in search of more suitable habitats.
Since suitable habitats are abundantly present in the wider area, and these impacts will affectonly a small number of individual specimens, this local impact cannot endanger their
populations.
An increase in adult bird fatalities is not expected given the mobility and adaptation of birds
to vehicles movement at the present landfill. If active bird nests are present within theconstruction area, some nestling fatalities are possible. Given the number of the protected
and strictly protected bird species found at the site, this impact should be mitigated byremoval of natural habitat vegetation prior to the bird nestling period.
The diversity of bird fauna (some of which are protected by national regulations) within theplanned project area is largely related to the vicinity of habitats in wet areas.
Protected natural areas
Due to the significant distances of protected areas from the construction site, construction
works will not have an impact on them.
Air
During the construction phase, the air quality can be affected by the emission of exhaustgases from construction machinery and dust from the construction site, especially in a dry
and windy period.
Regarding dust emissions, they may be reduced to a low significance level through goodpractice. Regarding the impacts of the exhaust gases, as these types of impacts are alreadypresent at the site, they will not cause a significant change from present or future condition(operation phase).
Additional traffic due to construction works will take place mainly within the boundaries ofthe project, with, to a lesser extent, occasional and temporary traffic outside of them.
Noise
In order to predict the impact of noise during the project construction phase, 3D acoustic
modelling (CadnaA 2018 version software) was performed. Modelling integrates thefollowing parameters:- terrain topography,-

mobile sources of noise at the locality (vehicles).

In order to model the noise levels caused during the construction phase, all the data relating
to noise generated by the equipment, its level and spectrum, and the time of activity are taken
into account. The results of the model are shown in the following figures, with calculations at
two different heights: one at the height of a human (Scenario 1) and the other one at a heightof 4m (Scenario 2).
321_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

322_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Based on the results of modelling at the selected locations (measuring points), the level ofnoise in the environment during the construction phase ranged from 20.5 to 31.3 dB (A).
Compared to the real measurements performed at the same measuring points (noise
measurements were made in March 2018 at 10 measuring points by the City Public HealthInstitute - see chapter 5.6 The level of noise in the environment, The results of examining thebaseline for this project), the calculation values were always lower for about 10 dB (A).
LandscapeThe location of the project stretches over four landscape structures: landfills and naturalareas, which occupy most of the project area, and agricultural areas and forests, which appear
on a very small section of the site.
In the project construction phase, the existing landscape will be changed in the area
designated for construction of the New Landfill and accompanying facilities.
Cultural heritage
Based on the consolidated results of geophysical magnetometric and morphometric surveys
in the Vinča landfill investigation area („Tehnohidrosfera“ doo March 2017), it has beenconcluded that there are no anomalies that indicate the presence of archaeological objects ormaterials in the planned project area.
Infrastructure
Construction of a new facility requires transportation and delivery of materials by trucks
along the existing road network. Potentially, poorly trained or inexperienced vehicle drivers
could increase risk of accidents involving other vehicles, pedestrians, and equipment.
Construction vehicles, as well as on-site private vehicles, also pose potential risk of collision.
323_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Potential collisions could result in the congestion of the existing regional two-lane road
(Smederevo road).
Transportation of workers is also anticipated, but it will have less of an impact on congestion.
The impact will be temporary and limited to the period of construction. Possible impacts on
traffic during construction will be limited in time and space. With good traffic/logistics
management, they can be reduced to a low significance level.
During construction, some elements of the water management system and/or power supply
can be physically damaged as a result of an incident, which can potentially lead to negative
effects (stoppage of water supply, power outage, etc.).
Waste
Environmental load resulting from inappropriate waste handling may occur due to improper
disposal of construction and other waste, or if waste is improperly deposited and temporarily
stored in the surrounding area. By a proper organization of the site, all potentially adverse
effects, mainly related to inadequate disposal of waste, soil, construction waste, etc., will be
kept to a minimum.
In order to prevent negative impacts on the environment on the location, the generated waste
should be handled in such a way that it is re-used at the same construction site (backfilling,levelling etc.) to the maximum, while the surplus and potentially generated waste must be
handed over to the legal entities authorised for waste management. Depending on the type ofthe generated waste, further treatment or disposal should be carried out in accordance withthe regulations relating to waste management.

6.3. POSSIBLE IMPACTS DURING REGULAR OPERATION
Possible impacts on the local community in regular operation in terms of air quality, noise,water quality, soil quality, transport and traffic are considered. It can be said that the project
carries certain risks and produces impacts on the environment quality and local community, butthese impacts will be significantly reduced or eliminated in relation to the existing conditions.
Potential impacts on the health and safety of workers are related to the workplace and theworker’s job description.
The Vinča complex will be surrounded by precipitation drainage canals, so the rainwateraround the complex will not get to the project area.

324_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The possible impacts of the New Landfill project and accompanying facilities are:-improper disposal of municipal waste, residues from EfW plants and inert waste-

emissions of landfill gas-

dust emissions from the CDW platform-

leachate generation-

generation of waste and oily waters in the Entrance-Control Zone and on the Operation
Platform-an increase in the level of noise in the complex-

improper handling of petroleum products (diesel fuel)-improper handling of generated hazardous waste, etc.

During the operation phase, it is likely that the opening of the cells at the New Landfill will
obstruct groundwater flows and reroute them temporarily or permanently to natural recipients.
In order to prevent the potential negative impact on the quality of the environment, health,safety and security of the population, a specific chapter of this study defines the appropriate
measures designed to prevent, reduce and eliminate the adverse impacts of the project.

6.4. OTHER POSSIBLE RISKS AND IMPACTS
Social risks and impacts
Generally speaking, the implementation of the comprehensive project of the Vinča landfill
complex regulation and construction will result in the reduction of negative impacts on theenvironment.
The existing landfill has not been constructed in accordance with the requirements applicableto sanitary landfills or the principles of environmental protection.
The pollution of the Ošljan stream (Ošljanski potok) and Ošljan pond (Ošljanska bara), as wellas the contamination of the surrounding agricultural land with contaminated leachate, represent
the most severe examples of environmental pollution. Landfill gas is prone to inflammationand explosion, and the resulting fire can last for weeks.
Unpleasant odours and their spread outside the landfill complex are also a factor of possible
inconveniences to the surrounding population.
Taking into consideration what was said above, the rehabilitation of the existing landfill, theconstruction of a new sanitary landfill in accordance with the existing EU legislation andnorms, the provision of a leachate collection and treatment system, the provision of a system
for the collection of landfill gas and its exploitation in the BEP plant for the production ofelectricity and hot water and the combustion of solid waste in the EfW plant to generate
electricity and heat, would have an exceptional positive impact on the quality of life in thecomplex surrounding.
325_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Thanks to the planned project, most of the existing negative impacts on the environment andhuman health will be eliminated or reduced in relation to the current situation. Aftercompletion of the planned activities on the landfill complex, a significant increase in thequality of life of the residents in the nearby settlements is expected. The rehabilitation andconstruction of the New Landfill is a measure of preservation and protection of theenvironment.
In addition to the above mentioned positive effects, there are also risks that the project
implementation may bring, such as:-

The influx of external workforce for construction and other works and activities canlead to various negative social risks, impacts and conflicts. Many of these risks may bealready present or may occur regardless of the external workforce influx.

-

An increased risk of illegal conduct and crime;-

A risk of increasing competition in service provision;-

An increased risk of contagious diseases and growing burden on the local health careservices-

Increasing pressure on accommodation and renting costs.

It is essential that the presence of external workforce should affect the locals as little aspossible.
Increase in waste management tariffs
Currently, the City of Belgrade is charging citizens and businesses with the municipal waste
collection and transport tax only. Since the project is aimed to provide services for the disposal
and treatment of the solid communal waste and utilization of generated energy, the City ofBelgrade plans to introduce a new pricing for services. As this is a sensitive issue, its
introduction is carefully prepared, with the aim to ensure that the services are provided at anaffordable cost to every household.
Risks and social impact
It is to be expected that the local community will have concerns and dilemmas regarding
various environmental, social and economic issues. Although the local community may have anegative perception of the project itself, the project will surely bring some significant benefits.
It is therefore crucial to hold public consultations, educate and inform the concerned public
about the planned activities.
In the construction phase there will be the opportunities for short-term employment of the local
population and engagement of local companies. In addition, in the subsequent phases of the
project implementation, there will be the possibilities for employment of qualified and trained
employees, especially those recruited from the population of the working age living in theneighbouring villages.
The project envisages the employment of about 120 workers, with different qualifications, forwork in:326_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________- administration- maintenance- laboratories- production facilities (CDW, EfW and BEP)
- security, etc.

These jobs will primarily be offered to local residents, which will have a significant positiveeffect on the employment rate in these communities. This may be an opportunity to increase
the number of employed women, which brings a moderate, positive and long-term effect ongender equality.
In addition to direct employment on the construction site, it may be possible for the local
population to provide support services, such as: catering, transportation (transport of workers
and/or construction materials to the site) and security.
There is also an increased demand for renting accommodation and other services (opening of
mixed-goods stores, clothing stores, mechanic services, etc.).
Long-term economic benefits can mainly be attributed to the activation of agricultural
production in the vicinity of the landfill, as the project will significantly reduce or eliminate
certain existing negative effects on the landfill complex.
Risks and impacts on health and safety of people and employees
Impacts on the health and safety of the community are directly linked to the negative impacts
in the physical environment relating to emissions of pollutants into the air, water and land, as
well as to noise, unpleasant odours, etc. The project envisages a significant reduction or
elimination of some of these negative impacts.
Potential impacts on the safety of the labour employed for construction works on the facilities
will be those expected for any construction project involving physical work, the use of heavymachinery and equipment, the transport of building materials, etc. There is a risk of inhalationof aerosols from the existing landfill. A prolonged exposure to particles present in the air posesa risk and potentially can negatively affect the health of the employed workers.
The Contractor is obliged to provide the employees with a safe workplace and appropriate
personal protective equipment, depending on the type of the activity and the work they
perform. A construction project can involve specific risks, such as:- falls, electric shocks, injuries, exposure to the high levels of noise and dust, exposure to
toxic substances, collapse of trench walls, risks related to weather conditions (work atvery low or high temperatures), etc.
-

hygiene, food supplies, etc.

327_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Project impact on climate change
A potential impact of climate change is directly related to the green house gas emission of the
project. The calculation of such emission takes into account the following:• Emission from the existing landfill, after rehabilitation;• Emission from the new landfill (excluding inert parts);• Direct emission from EfW (from waste combustion (CO 2 and N 2 O) and use of fuel)- all the equipment used at the location (fuel consumption);• Indirect emission from electric energy consumed for operation on the site;• GHG is avoided by energy recovery at EfW:
- by generating electric energy- by generating heat.
Table 49 GHG emissions – the whole location components
Emitter

GHG

2015

2025

2035

2050

2075

585 999342 754

44 22600Captured0

210 075

33 17000Released0

132 679

11 057

0

0

Total

0

187 962210 075

4 423

3 317

Captured0

121 622132 679

3 317

2 211

Released0

66 33977 396

1 106

1 106

EfW

0

116 021116 021116 021116 021Site (electricity and fuel)
Avoided ( electricity and
heat)
TOTAL

0

34 64434 64434 64434 6440-229 564-229 564-229 564-229 564

585 999

120 1199 553-77 794-77 794

Total
Old landfill

New landfill

The Project will have a positive impact on the green house gas emission because of thegeneration of electric energy and heat and the connection to the Serbian grid (with a positive
contribution due to CO 2 emission in the real mixture of Serbian electricity generation) andbecause of the remarkable reduction of CO 2 emission from the old landfill. A huge continuing
improvement of greenhouse gas emission (due to remediation of landfill, shift to emission
control process and generation of heat and power) will result in saving of more than 11.5
million tons of CO 2 over the global period from 2025 to 2046, with the mean annual reductionof green house gasses being equivalent to more than 112,670 passenger cars per year or
250,800 hectares of forests (Source: US EPA Calculator for Greenhouse Equivalents,
consulted in September 2017).

328_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The impact of climate change on the project
The impact of climate change on the landfill and the EfW plant has been analysed inaccordance with the Guidelines on how to increase the project resilience to climate change(Source: Non-paper guidelines for project managers Making vulnerable investments climate
resilient). The goal of the analysis is to determine sensitivity and the extent of the exposure of
the project to the primary and secondary climatic impacts in order to make a final assessmentof the potential risks to the project, and depending on the risk, to identify and assess adaptation
options to mitigate the risk. The analysis can be evaluated through seven modules shown in thetable below.
Table 50 Modules in the process of climate resilience
ModuleDescription of module1
Sensitivity analysis
2
Exposure assessment
3
Vulnerability analysis (incorporating outputs ofModules 1 and 2)
4
Risk assessment
5
Identifying adaptation options
6
Adaptation option assessment
7
Integrating adaptation action plan into the project
According to the guidelines applied, Modules 1 through 3 are used for assessment of the
project vulnerability to the climate change.
With the analysis completed as shown below, it has been determined that all the weaknesses
seem to be insignificant and do not require any further measures to be taken, while modules 4through 7, which include risk assessment, identification of options in response to vulnerability
and risks and modification of the project design, do not need to be used.
Sensitivity analysis
The project sensitivity to key climate changes (the primary and secondary changes) has to beassessed based on the four following topics:
1. Property and processes on site
2. Inputs (water, energy, other)
3. Outputs (products and markets)
4. Transport connections (transportation).
The project sensitivity is based on four topics in relation to the climatic variables and is gradedin line with the tables below.
Table 51 Possible sensitivity of the project
Project sensitivity
High sensitivity
3
Medium sensitivity
2
No sensitivity
1329_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Where:• High sensitivity: The climate variable / threat may have a significant impact on assets andprocesses, input and output data and transport connections.
• Medium sensitivity: The climate variable / threat may have insignificant impact on assets
and processes, input and output data and transport connections.
• No sensitivity: The climate variable / threat has no effect.
Table 52 Project sensitivity to climate variables and secondary effects of climate change
Transport
connections(transportation)

Property andprocesses on site

Input data
(water, energy,
other)

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

2
2
2
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1

2
2
2
1
1
1

1
2
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
2

1
1
1
1
1
2

2
2
2
1
1
2

1
2
1
1
1
1

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2
2
2
1
3
1
2
1
1

2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1

2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1

2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1

2
2
2
1
3
1
1
1
1

2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1

2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1

2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1

Outputs(products andmarket)Transport
network(transportation)

Outputs(products andmarket)Annual/seasonal/ monthly average airtemperature
Extreme air temperature (frequency
and range)
Annual/seasonal/ monthly average
precipitation
Extreme rainfalls (frequency andrange)
Average wind speed
Maximum wind speed
Air humidity
Solar radiation
Water temperature
Water availability
Storm (impacts and intensity)
including storm surge
Flood
Storm dust
Soil erosion
Soil salinity
Wild fireAir quality
Soil instability (landslides, avalanches)
Effect of urban heat island temperature
Length of growth season

Input data
(water, energy,
other)SECONDARY EFFECTSPRIMARY EFFECTSSENSITIVITY TO CLIMATE

EfW

Property andprocesses on site

LANDFILL

Exposure assessment
The project exposure to 20 climatic aspects is assessed for the current and the future situation.
The exposure data should be collected for climatic variables and related threats to which theassets exhibit high or medium sensitivity (from Module 1) of the project. The exposure isassessed based on the three grades shown in the table below.

330_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 53 Location exposure to climate change
Location exposure
High exposure
3
Medium exposure2
No exposure
1
Where:• High exposure: The climate variable / threat can be significantly changed in the future
periods being relevant to the project life span.
• Medium exposure: The climate variable / threat can be insignificantly changed in the
future periods being relevant to the project life span.
• No exposure: The climate variable / threat should not be changed in the future.
Table 54 Location exposure to the current and future climate change

Location

Annual/seasonal/ monthly average air temperature22

Extreme air temperature (frequency and range)

22Annual/seasonal/ monthly average precipitation22

Extreme rainfall (frequency and range)

2

2

Average wind speed

2

2

Maximum wind speed22

Air humidity2

2

Solar radiation

2

2

Water temperature

1

1

Water availability

22

Storm (impacts and intensity) including storm surge

1

1

Flood

1

1

Storm dust

1

1

Soil erosion

2

2

Soil salinity

1

1

Wild fire1

1

Air quality

2

2

Soil instability (landslides, avalanches)22Effect of urban heat island temperature

1

1

Length of growth season

1

1

PRIMARY EFFECTS

LOCATION EXPOSURE

SECONDARY EFFECTS

FUTURESITUATION

Location

CURRENTSITUATION

331_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Vulnerability analysis
If a certain project is simultaneously sensitive and exposed to specific climate changes, it isconsidered vulnerable in terms of that specific effect of climate change. Accordingly,
vulnerability can be calculated as the product of sensitivity and exposure, as per formula: V =S × E, where V is project vulnerability, S is project sensitivity and E is exposure.
If the product (V) is greater than or equal to 6, the project is considered extremely vulnerable
in terms of the observed effect of climate changes. If the product (V) is greater than 1 and lessthan 6, the project is moderately vulnerable.
Table 55 Results of project vulnerability to climate changes
Exposure

Sensitivity
Medium2
4
6

No sensitivity
12
3

No exposure
Medium
High

High
3
6
9

Table 56 Landfill vulnerability to current and future effects of climate changes
Outputs (products
and market)

Transport
connections(transportation)

Property andprocesses on the site

Input data (water,energy, other)

Outputs (products
and market)

Transport
connections(transportation)

Annual/seasonal/monthly averagetemperature
Extreme air temperature(frequency and range)
Annual/seasonal/monthly average
precipitation
Extreme rainfalls (frequency andrange)
Average wind speed
Maximum wing speed
Air humidity
Solar radiation
Water temperature
Water availability
Storm (impacts and intensity)
including storm surge
Flood
Storm dust
Soil erosion
Soil salinity
Wild fireAir quality
Soil instability (landslides,
avalanches)
Effect of urban heat island
temperature
Length of growth season

U Input data (water,energy, other)

SECONDARY EFFECTSPRIMARY EFFECTS

VULNERABILITY TO
CLIMATE – LANDFILL

FUTURE SITUATION

Property andprocesses on the site

CURRENT SITUATION

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

4
4
4
2
1
2

2
2
2
2
1
2

4
4
4
2
1
2

2
4
2
2
1
2

4
4
4
2
1
2

2
2
2
2
1
2

4
4
4
2
1
2

2
4
2
2
1
2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2
2
4
1
3
4

2
2
4
1
1
2

2
2
4
1
2
4

2
2
4
1
2
2

2
2
4
1
3
4

2
2
4
1
1
2

2
2
4
1
2
4

2
2
4
1
2
2

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

332
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 57 EfW vulnerability to current and future effects of climate changes
Outputs (products
and market)

Transport
connections(transportation)

Property andprocesses on the site

Input data (water,energy, other)

Outputs (products
and market)

Transport
connections(transportation)

Annual/seasonal/monthly averagetemperature
Extreme air temperature(frequency and range)
Annual/seasonal/monthly
precipitation
Extreme rainfalls (frequency andrange)
Average wind speed
Maximum wind speed
Air humidity
Solar radiation
Water temperature
Water availability
Storm (impacts and intensity)
including storm surge
Food
Storm dust
Soil erosion
Soil salinity
Wild fireAir quality
Soil instability (landslides,
avalanches)
Effect of urban heat island
temperature
Length of growth season

Input data (water,energy, other)

SECONDARY EFFECTSPRIMARY EFFECTS

VULNERABILITY TO
CLIMATE RANJIVOST NA
KLIMU - EfW

FUTURE SITUATION

Property andprocesses on the site

CURRENT SITUATION

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

2
2
2
2
1
4

2
2
2
2
1
4

4
4
4
2
1
4

2
4
2
2
1
2

2
2
2
2
1
4

2
2
2
2
1
4

4
4
4
2
1
4

2
4
2
2
1
2

1

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2
2
4
1
3
4

2
2
4
1
2
2

2
2
4
1
2
4

2
2
4
1
2
2

2
2
4
1
3
4

2
2
4
1
2
2

2
2
4
1
2
4

2
2
4
1
2
2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Based on the analysis, the project is not significantly vulnerable to the assessed primary andsecondary effects of climate change.
As the analysis is made on the basis of the current projections of climate change, the adaptationof the project to climate change has to be regularly checked and analysed. Further analyses
should be part of the Environment Management System within the framework of theEnvironment
Permit.

333_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Possible impacts of the existing landfill on the new landfill
The following elements add to the avoidance of impacts of the existing landfill on the new one:
- Water and leachate management on the new landfill and the existing landfill is kept
separate, as illustrated in Figure 124.
- Atmospheric water management relies on gravity. The new landfill lies upstream from theexisting landfill, and the atmospheric water will flow from the existing landfill eastward (while
the new landfill is located to the west).
- Similarly, leachate from the existing landfill flows downstream (eastward).
- A layer on the bottom of the new landfill will provide for collection of leachate and will bewatertight to the composite layer shown in Figure 125.

Figure 124 Typical cross-section between new and old landfill (Source: Suez Consulting, 2018)

Figure 125 Atmospheric water management from existing landfill (Source: Suez Consulting,
2018)

334
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Slika 124/ Figure 124
leva strana /on the left
Cross section
View from above 1/10000

New landfill
Top cover materials
Top lining system
Cover material under foundation layer
Waste at new landfill
Gravel drainage layer
Leachate outlet
Bottom lining system
Clay material (depth 0.5m)
Bottom lining system
Trench with backfilling material
Leachate collector
Manhole with valve
Primary leachate collector
Access roaddesna strana/on the right

Old landfill
Existing waste
Drainage layer
Top shape-changing layer (cover)

Rainwater outlet

Leachate outlet with HDPE layer

Peripheral trench
Ditch with rainwater

Legend: (on the left/levo)
335_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Municipal solid waste (MSW) at the new landfill
MSW at the old landfill
TrenchTop layer (cover) of the new landfill
Top layer (cover) of the old landfill after reshaping
Clay material

Legend: (on the right/desno)
Existing surface of Vinča landfill for municipal solid waste
Proluvial sediments (silt clay, mixed with municipal solid waste)
Deluviun-eluvium (deluvial sandy silt clay, clay silt)
Complex of Miocene swamp deposits----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Slika 125 / Figure 125
New landfill lying upstream from existing landfill

Existing landfill

Surface outflow
Closing systemdrainage

Water drainage and evacuation via geocomposite
Waste

336
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

6.5. CUMULATIVE EFFECTS WITH OTHER FACILITIESThe wider area of the Vinča complex is mainly used for agriculture. However, some of theparcels are now abandoned (there is a succession of agricultural land). Forests are reduced toforest patches and those that have remained in the alluvial areas along the Danube River. A
smaller number of agricultural land parcels are located next to the landfill.
The asphalt plant is located south of the body of the landfill (about 400 m). Larger industrial
areas are located in the western parts of Belgrade at a considerable distance. In relation to thelandfill, they lie southwest, west and northwest, at the distance of 5km.
A high-voltage block is located 3 km northwest of the landfill.
The most important industrial zone is located in the southern part of Pančevo. There are an
oil refinery, a chemical industry complex and a river port there. In relation to the landfill,they are located at a distance of about 8 km to the north-east, on the left bank of the Danube.
Considering all the activities planned to be carried out at the site of a comprehensive landfill
project in Vinča and in its immediate vicinity, it is not expected that the effects of the project
could be so great to cause, together with other plants, any significant cumulative impacts.

337_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

7.0. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN CASE OF
AN ACCIDENT
Accidents in industrial plants, such as unexpected events with undesirable short-term or longterm effects on the health and safety of people and the environment, can be the result of
natural risks of the site, technical and technological risks, characteristics of raw materials,
equipment, chemicals, products, external influences - both intentional and unintentional, and,most often, human factors.

7.1. NATURAL RISKSAt the site and in the wider surroundings of the municipal waste landfill in Vinča, thefollowing natural risks are possible:- Landslides- Floods- Earthquakes.
Landslides
According to the data from the Cadastre of landslides, unstable slopes in Belgrade, including
areas affected by active, stabilized or remediated landslides, cover about 377 km2. The
occurrence of major landslides have been noted in the foothills and hilly terrain south of theSava and the Danube: on the Sava slope (Savska padina) stretching from Duboko to Umka,
in the city proper, on the right Danube slope (Karaburma, Višnjica, Vinča, Ritopek, Grocka),and in the valleys of the right tributaries of the Sava and the Danube.
Colluvial processes can be observed on the Danube slope. Landslides are mostly active, withgreat depths exceeding 10 – 15 m. An extension of the landfill to this part of the field should
not be planned.
The sliding process in the valley of the Ošljan stream (Ošljanski potok) is less developed.
Local landslides are much smaller in size and depth (on average 3-5 m) and the intensity ofslope movement is not high. In this area, four landslides can be distinguished, including:- Landslide in the catchment area of the southern branch of the Ošljanski potok(Ošljan stream). The landslide is active to a greater extent. The estimated sliding
depth is about 3-5 m. Under the conditions of inadequate technogenic impacts, thesliding process might be activated.
- Landslide on the right slope in the lower part of the Ošljanski potok (Ošljan
stream). This landslide is somewhat larger in terms of the area affected and somewhat
more complex. However, in natural conditions it is stable. Inadequate technogenic
impacts could re-activate the process.
- Landslide on the location of ''Todorović vineyard'' (north of the existing
landfill) is in one small part an active landslide, while in the larger part of the terrain
there are no clear traces of earlier movements any longer. As is the case of theprevious landslides, inadequate operation could lead to the re-activation of the sliding
338_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

process.

FloodsVinča landfill complex is located 1.6 km west of the Danube River. The nearest water
monitoring stations are Zemun, Pančevo and Smederevo. The table below shows the
maximum levels of the Danube River at the indicated water monitoring stations.
Table 58 Recorded maximum water levels
Station
Zemun
Pančevo
Smederevo

Level „0“, (m)Record high water level(cm)

Maximum waterlevel (mwl)

67,87
67,33
65,36

783
777
845

75,7
75,1
73,8

The lowest section of the Vinča landfill is located approximately at 85 meters above sea level,
which is approximately 10 meters higher than the maximum water level recorded in the wider
observed area. Thus, it can be concluded that there are no risks of flooding.
Earthquakes
Under the Amendment to the Rulebook on Technical Standards for Construction of High
Buildings in Seismic Area (“Official Gazette of SFRY” no. 59/90), the observed area, likeother areas of Belgrade, have been assigned a higher degree of seismic intensity, from VII to
VIII MCS, with the values of ground seismicity coefficient of Ks = 0.05.

7.2. FIRE AND EXPLOSION RISKAt landfills, a fire is a significant and possible accident situation. Fires can be caused byspontaneous combustion of waste (disposal of flammable materials, disposal of smouldering
materials, when glass acts as a lens, and similar), human activities (burning of waste, smoking,use of spark discharge devices), motor vehicles (sparks) or natural causes (friction, lightning).
Fire, as described above, appears as a surface fire.
Fires at landfills pollute the atmosphere with harmful combustion products and pose a risk to
the environment (population, animals, vegetation). Fires can occur as a surface fire which isusually caused by a fire spreading to the body of the landfill, where gases produced by thefermentation of waste and biodegradable process are generated.
Fire is a phenomenon relatively typical of landfills, but the waste disposal technology which
includes compacting and covering with inert material reduces its occurrence to a minimum.
In June 2017, the municipal waste landfill in Vinča caught fire (Source: Serbian
Environmental Protection Agency, www.sepa.gov.rs). The smoke that was created was
spreading to the surrounding parts of the city. During the fire, as well as several days after
the fire was extinguished, the City Public Health Institute in Belgrade, which regularly
monitors 24 measuring stations within the local monitoring network, was continuously
monitoring the concentration of pollutants in the air on the territory of Belgrade, focusing339_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

especially on the situation regarding the fire at the Vinča landfill.
Special attention was paid to the neighbourhoods of Lešće, Višnjička Banja, Višnjica, Rospićuprija, Karaburma, Krnjača, Kotež, Borča, Mirijevo, parts of Zvezdara, and some otherparts of the city, even though they were located at a considerable distance from the landfill,since due to the weather conditions during the night and in the early morning hours pollutants
could have spread over a long distance.
Together with the City of Belgrade Secretariat for Environmental Protection, four additional
measuring stations were established in order to ensure a more detailed monitoring of theresulting situation. The additional measurement stations made their measurements from 8
June 2017 to 29 June 2017. These measurement stations had been selected to determine theimpact of fire at the Vinča landfill on air quality in the best possible way.
According to the results obtained by the City Institute of Public Health, no excessive values
were recorded for the common pollutants (carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, sulphur
dioxide, suspended particles below 10 microns (PM 10 ), and ground-level ozone) included in
the air pollution program measurement for the territory of Belgrade.
The results obtained from four additional measuring stations, which were measuring theparameters not included in regular monitoring (PM 10 , phenolic substances, ammonia),
showed that the measured values did not exceed the limit values and the maximum
permissible concentrations determined by the Regulation on Monitoring Conditions and Air
Quality Requirements (“Official Gazette of RS” No 11/2010, 75/2010 and 63/2013).
The measured concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons did not deviate from thevalues characteristic of the urban environment, except on June 11 2017, 12 June 2017, and 13
June 2017, when a variation of the concentration, depending on the compound, wasobserved. Some compounds had a decreasing trend, while some had an increasing trend.
According to the findings of the City Institute of Public Health, the oscillations inconcentrations of certain compounds from the group of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
were caused by the presence of smoke from the fire at the Vinča landfill.
Although higher concentrations were detected, they were not at the levels that could cause
serious health effects. Recommendations were given to sensitive groups of citizens (such as
people with chronic cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, elderly people, children,
pregnant women and medical workers) to reduce the presence of smoke in the air in the eventof smoke and unpleasant odour.
The concentrations of heavy metals (arsenic As, cadmium Cd, nickel Ni, lead Pb) insuspended PM 10 particles were at the levels characteristic of the urban environment.
In addition to fire, explosion of generated methane and hydrogen from landfill gas is also
possible. Methane is a gas which, when found concentrated from 5 to 15%, forms an
explosive mixture with air. A negative impact can occur due to the failure to comply with thelandfill deposition technology, i.e., failure to cover the waste with inert materials, which maylead to build up of methane under the impermeable surfaces.

340_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

7.3. EXTERNAL RISKS
External risks of relevance to the project site are related to deliberate actions intended toinflict serious material damage and/or to endanger human life (terrorist act) or arise as aresult of the "domino" effect caused by an accident at other industrial plants in thesurroundings.
On the basis of the available data submitted so far to the Ministry of Environmental Protection
by the operators of Seveso plants/establishments, it has been determined that, within the area
covered by the Detailed Regulation Plan of the Vinča Sanitary Landfill, there is no Seveso
plants/establishments, while on the territory of the City of Belgrade, to which the municipalityof Grocka belongs, there is a large number of Seveso establishments, but the effect of potential
major chemical accidents there do not pose a threat to the area covered by the above stated
Detailed Regulation Plan. On the other hand, the area covered by the mentioned Detailed
Regulation Plan may be affected by chemical accidents on the territory of the neighbouring
City of Pančevo, in the worst case scenario of an accident in a Seveso establishment HIP“Azotara” d.o.o. Pančevo.
The area covered by the Detailed Regulation Plan of the Vinča Sanitary Landfill is situatedwithin the zone of ammonia toxic cloud effects, which is a possible result of the worst casescenario envisaged by this establishment, in part for the IDLH (immediately dangerous to lifeor health) concentration (300 ppm of ammonia), during a 30 minute exposure period, and inpart for the 0.1IDLH concentration (30 ppm of ammonia), during a 30 minute exposure
period.
This accident scenario is a level IV accident – the regional level of accident, and thelikelihood of the occurrence is assessed as low (4.7 x 10-7 /year). On 5 August 2016, theoperator HIP “Azotara” d.o.o. Pančevo passed the Decision on Approval of the Safety Reportand Accident Protection Plan, where the identified accident scenarios, accident impact zones,
and prevention measures undertaken by the operator to prevent an accident were described.

7.4. RISK OF ACCIDENTS CAUSED BY HUMAN FACTOR
Statistically, most of accident situations arise due to a human factor caused by insufficienttraining, unclear operational procedures and/or negligence.

341_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

8.0. DESCRIPTION OF MEASURES PROVIDED FOR
PREVENTION, REDUCTION AND ELIMINATION OF
ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT
8.1.

MEASURES PROVIDED BY LAW AND OTHER REGULATIONS,NORMATIVES AND STANDARDS AND DEADLINES FOR
THEIR IMPLEMENTATION

The legislation and the EU directives regulating waste management are volumenous and just a
section of them is presented in the chapter listing the documentation used for the study. The
application of the provisions set out in legislation is binding for the Client, regardless of theprotection measures envisaged by this study.
---

According to the Regulation on Waste Disposal in Landfills (“Official Gazette ofRS”, No 92/2010), the Client is obliged to respect the technical and technologicalconditions regarding designing, construction and operation of a waste landfill, thetype of waste deposing of which is forbidden, the amount of biogradable waste which
can be deposited, criteria and procedures for acceptance or non-acceptance in thelandfill, the methods and procedures of landfill operation and closure, the scope andmethod of landfill operation monitoring, and subsequent maintenance after thelandfill closure.
According to the Law on Waters („Official Gazette of RS“No 95/2018), it is the
responsibility of the Client to regularly monitor, by employing an authorizedlaboratory, the quality of wastewater before its entering into the recipient.
The concentration of pollutants in wastewater discharged into the recipient must notexceed the limit values prescribed by the Regulation оn Emission Limit Values of
Pollutants in Water and Deadlines for Achieving them („Official Gazzette of RS“ No
67/11, 48/12 and 1/16).
When discharging wastewater, the criteria stated in the following regulations should
be considered:•

Decision on Determining Inventory of First-Order Streams ("Official Gazette ofRS", No 83/10),•

Regulation on Watercourse Classification ("Official Gazette of SRS", No 5/86),•

Rulebook on Hazardous Substances in Water ("Official Gazette of SRS", No
31/82).

-

Law on Waste Management ("Official Gazette of RS", No 36/09, 88/10, 14/16, and95/2018 – other law), setting out the procedure for obtaining waste management permit,
defines, inter alia, the obligation of control, monitoring and reporting on suspended
particles, control of unpleasant odours, control and monitoring of noise, control ofvermin and birds, control of spreading of waste and other matters in landfills.

-

Waste materials should be treated in accordance with the Law on Waste Management("Official Gazette of RS", No 36/09, 88/10, 14/16, and 95/2018 – other law).
342_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-The Client is obliged to treat hazardous waste in accordance with the Rulebook on the
Manner of Storage, Packaging and Labeling of Hazardous Waste ("Official Gazetteof RS" No 92/10).

-

Waste oils should be treated in accordance with the Rulebook on Conditions, Mannerand Procedure of Management of Waste Oils ("Official Gazette of RS", No 71/10).

-

Whenever hazardous waste is taken over by an authorized institution, a document on
the movement of waste is to be prepared in accordance with the Rulebook on theForm of Hazardous Waste Movement Document, the Form of Advance Notification,
the Manner of its Delivery and Filling in Instructions ("Official Gazette of RS" No
17/17).

-The movement of the waste which makes secondary raw material, as well as the
movement of any other waste, except for municipal and hazardous waste, has to beaccompanied with a document on the movement of waste to be filled in according to
the Rulebook on the Form of Waste Movement Document and Filling in Instructions("Official Gazette of the RS ", No 114/13).

-

During the operation of the plant, all the requirements defined by the Law on
Environmental Noise Protection ("Official Gazette of RS", No 36/09 and 88/10) haveto be applied.

-

Within the complex, all the requirements defined by the Fire Protection Law("Official Gazette of RS" No. 111/09 and 20/15) have to be applied.

-

Law on Integrated Prevention and Control of Environment Pollution (“Official Gazetteof RS” No 135/2004 and 25/2015) defines the conditions and procedure for issuing an
integrated permit for plants and activities that may have a negative impact on humanhealth, environment and material goods, the type of activities and plants, oversight andother issues being relevant for prevention and control of the environment pollution.

-

Rulebook on Methodology for the Development of the Rehabilitation and Remediation
Design (“Official Gazette of the RS” No 74/2015) defines the procedure of developing
design for rehabilitation and remediation of existing non-sanitary landfills.

In this project, the guidelines derived from the EU directives, reference BAT documents,
international conventions and agreements to which the Republic of Serbia is a signatory party
are also binding.
The obligations under the laws, regulations, standards and other documents, on which the
preparation of the project technical documentation is based, are part of the conditions set by
the competent authorities and institutions.
By implementing the project in accordance with the revised and adopted technicaldocumentation, under control and supervision of the competent administrative bodies, theimplementation of the environmental protection measures that arise from legislation,
standards, normatives and this study should be ensured.

343_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

8.2. MEASURES TO BE TAKEN IN ACCIDENT SITUATIONS
Multiple measures are to be taken in the event of an accident. These measures can be
categorized into:- accident prevention measures;-

accident preparedness and response measures; andaccident consequences remediation measures.

Based on the above, the Client is obliged:
1. To comply, in all implementation phases, with the technical documentation, especiallythe fire protection design.
2. To develop procedures and operating instructions on how to deal with accident
situations.
3. To train the employees how to respond to accident situations.
4. To develop appropriate accident response flowcharts.
5. To appoint the persons responsible for dealing with accidents.
6. To clearly mark the areas with hazardous materials with appropriate notice boards,
warnings and prohibition of specific activities at critical points in the plant.
7. To provide appropriate installations for supply and distribution of fire-fighting water.
8. To provide appropriate stable fire-fighting facilities in line with the design.
9. To provide hand-operated and movable mobile fire extinguisher for fire fighting at theoutbreak of fire in line with the design.
10. To provide appropriate video surveillance installations.
11. To test employees’ skills and knowledge with regard to fire protection and inaccordance with the training programme approved by the competent body of the
Ministry of Interiors.
12. To conduct periodically training and exercises in simulated accidental situations, inaccordance with the training programme.
13. To ensure regular maintenance of fire-fighting equipment for initial fire extinguishingand control of hydrant network condition. Inspections and maintenance must be carriedout by authorized companies only.
14. In case of a small-scale fire/accident, to respond immediately using the appropriate
installed/provided equipment. This is the obligation of all individuals present/
employed, except in case of immediate threat to their own safety and life.
15. To evacuate highly flammable materials from the zone caught or likely to be caught byfire.
16. In case of an accident, to use all available fire fighting and fire spread prevention
equipment.
17. In case of a large-scale fire, to activate stable fire fighting system and inform theauthorities on the accident.
18. If assessed that fire cannot be tackled with the existing equipment and power, to inform
immediately the Ministry of Interior competent body – Sector for Emergency
Management.
19. Having assessed the unfolding situation, the responsible person should inform otheremergency services (emergency medical service), poison control centre, state344_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

authorities, local authorities and residing population, in accordance with the adopted
accident emergency measures procedure.
20. Upon arrival of professional services, their instructions should be followed.
21. During the accident, basic environmental factors must be monitored.
22. After an accident, a report on the accident that took place has to be made. The report
should envisage the mandatory measures to be taken to prevent the same or similar
accident from occurring again.
23. Depending on the scale and consequences of the accident, post-monitoring of theenvironmental factors affected by the accident has to be carried out.
24. The Client is obliged to provide resources for remediation after the accident andmitigation of the consequences caused by the accident, in accordance with the accident
consequences remediation plan.
25. Design documentation provides for the fire fighting system which consists of thefollowing:- fire water tank- fire water pumping stations- external and internal hydrant networks- installations with spray water.
- Supply with fire extinguishing water is enabled:• from a 72 m3 tank with constant water inflow• through "B" fire extinguishers from fire trucks• water distribution is provided through a fire pump plant.
26. The pumps are dimensioned to match the most unfavourable quenching zone while
simultaneously enabling operation of the external and internal hydrant network.
27. All roads, detours and platforms to be used if intervention of fire fighting vehicles isneeded are planned in accordance with the Rulebook on Technical Norms for Access
Roads, Detours and Arranged Platforms for Fire fighting Vehicles in the Vicinity of
Facilities with Increased Risk of Fire ("Official Gazette of FRY “No 8/95) in effect.
28. There are a small number of employees in facilities, but regardless of that fact there is aplan for safe evacuation of employees and visitors from each facility.

8.3. PLANS AND TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
During the design development, many environmental protection measures have already been
integrated into the project itself. In addition, in order to reduce or avoid any negative impact, as
well as to boost the positive impacts, in this chapter, due to the complexity of the project, theplanned protection measures are itemised for each phase of the project implementation:
Project preparation phase
Given the complexity of the Project, the Client must adhere to the provisions of national
legislation and guidelines provided by EU directives and must apply them whenconceptualizing the design and selecting the equipment.

345_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________The national legislation is defined by the laws, regulations and rulebooks governing thefollowing areas:- Planning and construction of facilities;- Environmental protection;- Protection of health and safety;- Protection of nature and biodiversity;- Protection of cultural heritage;- Protection from fire and accident situations;- Protection of air, water and land;- Protection from environmental noise.
During the project preparation and designing phase, the Client is obliged to obtain theconditions from the competent authorities and institutions.
In all subsequent phases of project development, it is necessary to comply with therequirements and guidelines set in the conditions of the competent authorities and institutions
and technical and design documentation.
Pre-construction phase – site mobilization
Water and land
- Temporary facilities for accommodation of workers on site (offices) are envisaged.
- The sufficient number of chemical toilets is envisaged and it is necessary to ensure thatthe toilets should be discharged by an authorized company.
- Containers for municipal and other types of waste and packaging are envisaged. The
containers have to be regularly and adequately emptied.
Landscape and noise- Designate and secure areas – green spaces which will not be used in the construction
phase.
- Mark the space and, if needed, enclose the space (deep excavation) where construction
activities will be performed.
Construction phase
Water- On all platforms where accidental leakage of liquid materials may be expected,
protective foils, tanks or similar should be installed.
- On all platforms and places where accidental leakage of fluids (diesel fuel, oil,chemicals, etc.) may be expected, suitable drains connected to a sedimentation tank and/or an
oil and grease separator should be installed.
- Petroleum products necessary for the operation of machines have to be stored in storage
areas designed for that purpose in order to prevent any leaks, in accordance with regulations.
Land and agricultural land
-Provide a surface area for deposition of excavated materials and soil within theconstruction site.
-Perform surface planning on the site.
-Ensure that all movements and manipulations of vehicle and machinery within theconstruction site are performed in an organized and controlled manner, with the minimum useof the green areas.
346_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________- Fill the vehicles and construction machinery with fuel at the designated places only.
- Keep vehicles and equipment in good working condition to prevent oil and fuel fromleaking.
- Provide equipment/material for the collection and disposal of spilled petroleum products,
if any.
- Contaminated adsorbents have to be disposed of in appropriate containers and treated inaccordance with the regulations governing waste management.
- Potentially contaminated soil must be stockpiled separately from clean soil.
- Ensure controlled disposal of the content from concrete mixers in the process of washingand removal of excess material (specially created pits coated with foils or any other acceptable
solution).
Biodiversity- Works on removing natural vegetation inside the planned project area should be carriedout from the beginning of September to the end of February in order to protect fauna of thelocally nesting bird.
- The protected species of midland hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata (Poir.) DC.) andcommon hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.) have to be used to form a greenbelt, or inplaces where individual trees have been removed, damaged or got sick.
- Natural vegetation cover must be preserved wherever possible, especially by limiting
working/manipulation area.
- All highly invasive species present in the project area should be removed.
- If highly invasive species reappear, they should be regularly removed from all surfaces(especially common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia).
- If strictly protected species are encountered during execution of works, take allnecessary protective measures and act in accordance with the conditions prescribed by theInstitute for Nature Conservation.
- Deliberate killing, capturing or disturbing of strictly protected species and other fauna isforbidden.
Air-Erect barriers (curtains) around dust raising activities (e.g. demolition of existing structures,etc.)-All vehicles should turn off their engines in the event of a prolonged
standstill during operation -Wash or clean all vehicles before leaving theconstruction site -All loads entering and leaving the site must be covered.
-Transport vehicles should meet the best local exhaust emissions standards.
-Use water as dust suppressant on the construction site (different types of sprayers etc.),
especially during summer and windy periods.
-Minimize dust-generating activities.
-Take excess soil off the construction site.
Noise-Turn off engines during breaks and when machinery is not directly involved in construction
works.
Landscape-Use the green space on the construction site as little as possible. Restore possibly damaged
green areas which are not planned for activities on the construction site.
347_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-After the completion of the construction phase, the land is to be restored and green areas are to
be planted in accordance with the Landscape Design.
-During the excavation, the topsoil will be separated, and will be used for rehabilitation of theterrain in the later stages after the works have been completed.
Traffic and transport-Draft the Traffic Management Plan on and off the construction site. If necessary, provide
temporary access alternatives to the complex.
-Plan routes for truck transport off the site to avoid unexpected traffic jams - "rush hour".
-Placement of warning signs and notices along the route for truck traffic is necessary.
-Trucks that transport bulk material (soil, sand, gravel, etc.) must be covered with a tarp inorder to prevent its dispersion during transport.
-Before leaving the construction site, especially during the rainy season, removal of mud fromwheels is mandatory.
Waste-The generated during construction will be sorted on-site (household, plastics, cardboard,
metal, hazardous waste...), using relevant storage options (bags, bins, containers).
-On the construction site, establish a temporary plateau for the installation of the appropriate
storage options for the generated waste.
-Ensure regular transport of generated waste from the construction site.
-For the removal of the generated waste from the construction site, engage legal entities withthe appropriate waste management license.
-Waste management on the construction site is the obligation of the contractor.
Regular operation phase-In the Entrance-control zone, provide control and records of entering the complex.
-Provide control of input waste for radioactivity.
-Provide a video surveillance system for visual inspection of bulk load in trucks.
-Provide weighbridges for weighing loaded and empty vehicles.
-Ensure the washing of the wheels of trucks coming out of the complex.

Water-Buried diesel fuel tank must be equipped with a double mantle and a waterproof reinforced
concrete bundwall.
-The bundwall must have sufficient capacity in order to accept the total amount of fuel stored.
-In all areas where leakage of fluids can occur (diesel fuel, oil, chemicals, etc.), suitable drains
must be installed with drainage to treatment in the sedimentation trap and/or separator ofgrease and oil, in accordance with the design.
-Grease and oil separators/sedimentation traps should be regularly maintained/emptied.
-Emptying and the contents of the oil and grease separators must be entrusted/handed over to
the Operator with the appropriate permit for operating this type of waste.
-All the surfaces where manipulation of liquids (oil derivatives, chemicals, etc.) is expectedmust be concreted or paved.
-Provide adequate collection and drainage of water to the designed sedimentation
trap/separator on these surfaces.
-Due to the occasional large daily amounts of precipitation, it is necessary to control andregularly maintain the condition of the perimeter channels.
348_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-Atmospheric, unpolluted waters should be drained via adequate sewage system in accordancewith the design.
-Atmospheric, potentially contaminated waters should be drained via adequate sewage system
to sedimentation trap/separator in accordance with the design.
-Sanitary-faecal water should be drained to a device for treatment of such waters.
-In accordance with the project documentation, make maximum use of unpolluted atmosphericwaters and treated technological wastewater - by a recirculation system.
-Ensure proper monitoring of all the waters that are being fed into the natural recipient.
-Conduct water monitoring to the recipient.
-The monitoring of the waters should be entrusted to an authorized and accredited
laboratory/legal entity.
-All buried objects, as well as parts of objects that are buried, should be built of watertightconcrete.
-Provide a system for collection, evacuation and treatment of leachate waters.
-Build lagoons for leachate waters and atmospheric waters with a suitable waterproof surface.
Soil and agricultural land
-Provide surface water drainage system, in order to ensure that surface water runoff is notaccumulating on the site and is not spilled outside the borders of the project.
-Provide adequate adsorbents for collection of possibly spilled liquids (petroleum products,
chemicals, etc.)-Provide appropriate storage options/packaging (e.g. metal barrels) for the disposal ofcontaminated adsorbents.
-Treat contaminated adsorbents as substances that have hazardous waste properties, according
to the report on the previously performed characterization of this type of waste, in accordancewith the law.
-Provide a place for temporary disposal of packaging with collected hazardous waste.
-The collection of generated waste should be entrusted to a legal entity with the appropriate
waste management permit.
Biodiversity-Regularly remove highly invasive species from all surfaces if they reappear.
-External light sources should point downward, i.e. be directed at the work surfaces.
Air-Provide reduction of dust diffusion emissions from all surfaces under the impact of the project(landfill, CDW platform, Operating platform ...), using water bowser trucks with sprinklers,
using water, especially in dry and windy periods.
Noise-Turn off engines of the vehicles within the complex during a break or longer standstill.
-Provide adequate personal protective equipment for all employees that are in active contact
with sources of noise.
-Provide adequate housings, antivibration pads, and sound insulation on equipment which
represent a significant source of noise and vibration.
-In facilities with equipment that is a noise emitter, keep any doors to the outside closed. Limit the speed of vehicles within and outside the complex.
Landscape-Within the green belt, it is necessary to remove and replace any damaged or witheredvegetation with the specimens of the same species, in accordance with the Landscape Design.
349_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Traffic and transport-Adhere to the Traffic Management Plan on and off the site.
-Organized and controlled movement of vehicles must be within defined traffic routes.
-Set up speed limit traffic signs within the complex.
-Washing of wheels of waste delivery vehicles and other delivery vehicles, before they enter
the public road, is mandatory.
Waste
Develop a Waste Management Plan.
The monitoring system must include the production of biogas and leachate waters andtheir treatment in accordance with applicable regulations and good industrial practices.
The structural stability and watertightness of the final cover system should bemonitored
regularly.
Due to possible large daily amounts of precipitation, it is necessary to control andregularly maintain the condition of the perimeter channels.
Regular controls of the surface water drainage system are necessary in order toensure that surface water drainage does not accumulate at the site.
-Provide adequate adsorbents for collection of possibly spilled liquids (petroleum
products, chemicals, etc.)
Provide adequate daily covering of landfilled waste in order to prevent thedispersion of light fractions from the landfill body (dust, paper, bags, etc.) and reduce
rainwater infiltration.
Surplus soil from excavation works shall be reused at the site.
In order to prevent seagulls from gathering and feeding on site in large
numbers, the active areas of the new landfill should be covered daily.
Regularly check the compactness of the enclosure around the landfill in order toprevent large mammals from entering the project site.
Regularly remove highly invasive species from all surfaces if they reappear.
Mowing at the landfill complex should be performed only once a year, so as to allow
for succession of natural grassland communities and prevent seagulls from using this area as aloafing habitat.
Enable the development of high herbaceous vegetation wherever possible (nearroads, channels, lagoons).
The covered areas of the active new landfill, which will not be used for at least amonth, should be planted with a mixture of fast-growing grasses.
Flue gas parameters should be monitored regularly, in accordance with legislation.
Monitor gas collection and combustion systems in order to control and prevent gas
loss.
Perform efficient covering and use of material placed on the received waste in orderto prevent odours from spreading.
Provide adequate personal protective equipment for all employees that are
in active contact with sources of noise.
Within the green belt, it is necessary to remove and replace any damaged or witheredvegetation with the specimens of the same species.
Washing of wheels of vehicles is performed in the landfill reception/control area,prior to their entrance onto a public road.
-Waste generated during operations, such as office waste, packaging, hazardous waste, etc.,
will be sorted on site.
350_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-Depending on the type of waste (non-hazardous/hazardous), conduct its adequate disposal in
the appropriate packaging.
-Waste packaging should be stored on defined surfaces and in facilities (depending on the typeof waste), in accordance with the Waste Management Plan.
-Keep the waste chemicals in the original packaging and store together with the chemical
packaging in the facility/room for hazardous waste.
-Special waste streams should be stored in accordance with legislation and the Waste
Management Plan.
-Waste control also involves keeping records, in accordance with legislation.
-Waste which does not meet the criteria for landfilling shall be returned to the owner of thesaid waste.
Social aspects
Project preparation phase-The Resettlement Action Plan and Livelihood Restoration Action Plan have been developed.
-The implementation of the Action Plan falls under the competence of the City of Belgrade.
Construction phase-The Action Plan defines the informing of companies and waste collectors about the expectedstart and duration of the individual phases of the project.
-Encourage contractors to hire local labour.
-Identify seasonal workers and ensure that their position is no less favourable than otherworkers performing similar functions.
Regular work phase-Provide educational materials on waste management.
-Organize forums with stakeholders (population, local communities,
NGOs...) and familiarize them with risks, applied protection measures, project benefits...
-Ensure cooperation with the local health institution.
-Provide grievance mechanisms for workers/employees and other stakeholders.
-Prohibit entry to unauthorized persons, citizens, and especially children.
-Provide a basic programme of professional development and special courses forworkers/employees.
-Encourage the engagement of women on appropriate jobs at the plant.
-Train workers in terms of a "good neighbourhood" policy, in order to avoid causing distrust in
the project.
Project-technical solutions
A system for the collection and evacuation of landfill (bio)gas to the BEP plant has
been designed.
In the event of a BEP plant stoppage, the control system of this plant shall
automatically redirect the generated biogas to the torch system.
Conditionally unpolluted atmospheric waters are accepted by an internal system of(mostly open) channels for the reception of atmospheric waters within the entire complex,
directed towards the lagoons for atmospheric waters on the Upper and Lower platforms.
The waters from the lagoon for atmospheric waters are used to wet the surfaces within
the complex (the exception being landfill cells), in order to reduce dust within the complex andother technological needs(at the EfW plant).
351_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Leachate waters and atmospheric contaminated water are collected in the lagoons forleachatewaters.
From the leachate water lagoon, they are directed to the leachate treatment plant (LTP)
before entering into the recipient.
Prior to the discharge of purified wastewater into a natural recipient, the installation offlow meters is foreseen.
Oiled atmospheric and other waters are taken to the sedimentation trap/separator, at the
Operational Platform.
Sanitary-faecal wastewater is treated at a sewage treatment plant (STP).
All areas where liquid leakage (diesel fuel, oil, chemicals, etc.) may occur areconcreted/paved with an appropriate drain towards the sedimentation trap/oil and grease
separator.
All lagoons for atmospheric waters and leachate waters (on the Upper and Lower
platforms) are provided with a suitable waterproof liner/casing.
Areas and facilities for temporary storage of all generated types of waste(non-hazardous and hazardous) on the Operational platform are planned.
A diesel fuel pumping station is designed on the Operational platform.
The diesel fuel tank has a double mantle.
"Open waste" is checked in the control zone, by worker checking the waste (directly)
on the weighbridge or by using a video camera.
The location of the entire Vinča landfill complex will be enclosed by an adequate wire
fence to prevent the entry of medium and large animals into the complex.
Landscaping of surfaces is done in accordance with the Landscape Design.
A supporting structure is designed on the periphery of the body of the "old" landfill.
The supporting structure has been designed with adequate hydrotechnical facilities foratmospheric and leachate waters from the "old" landfill.

8.4. OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES FORPREVENTION OR REDUCTION NEGATIVE IMPACT ON
ENVIRONMENT
The archaeological site "Ošljane" represents a resource that enjoys preliminary
protection on the basis of the Law on Cultural Heritage. In order to protect the archaeologicalsite "Ošljane", during the execution of any earth works or the construction of new facilities, theobligation of the Leading Contractor is to provide permanent archaeological surveillance andprotective archaeological interventions if archaeological objects or objects are found.
In accordance with the Conditions of Preservation, Maintenance and Use of Cultural
Resources and Resources that Enjoy Preliminary Protection, and the conditions of the Institutefor Protection of Cultural Monuments of the City of Belgrade (arch. No. P2249/14 from 23
July 2014, confirmed by letter P432/18 of 23 February 2018), the envisaged archaeologicalsupervision should be realized according to the special Programme, to be done at the Institutefor Protection of Cultural Monuments of the City of Belgrade, in cooperation with the Leading
Contractor.
If an archaeological site is discovered, there is a possibility that archaeological works
i and conservation of the site, relocation of findings, or displacement of parts of the projectwill be required. The Leading Contractor is obliged to respond to the possible requirements of
the Institute for Protection of Cultural Monuments.

352_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Also, if archaeological material is discovered during the works anywhere within theplanned project area, it is necessary, according to the Articles 28 and 29 of the Law on Cultural
Property ("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 71/94, 52/11 – other law, 92/11 – other law), to theInstitute for Protection of Cultural Monuments of the City of Belgrade and proceed in line with
their instructions.
If problems with odour outside the fence are discovered, carry out a preliminary
research on the concentrations of substances that are carriers of the said odour in order todetermine the origin and method of dispersion of the odour outside the complex.
The aforementioned research must also include a proposal for additional measures forthe reduction of odours.
In case of persistent odour issues arising outside the borders of the complex, an odour
survey should be performed according to European standard EN 16841-2: 2016 or European
standard EN 16841-1: 2016 (depending on the odour and its possible source) in order tocharacterise the odour, its source and conditions of its occurrence.

9.0. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MONITORINGPROGRAMME
The purpose of the environmental impact monitoring is for regular sampling and laboratory
analysis of the affected samples to be carried out at a certain time interval, in accordance withthe legislation. Subsequently, based on the defined limit values, the impact on the examinedenvironmental factors is determined and, if necessary, the measures for reduction of theobserved negative impacts are defined.
-

The monitoring the quality of wastewater shall be carried out in accordance with theRegulation on Emission Limit Values for Pollutants in Waters and Deadlines for their
Reaching ("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 67/2011, 48/2012 and 1/2016), and in accordancewith the Rulebook on the Manner and Conditions for Measuring the Quantities and Examining
the Quality of Waste Water, and the Contents of Reports on Performed Measurements("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 33/2016);
The monitoring of the quality of surface waters shall be carried out in accordance with
the Regulation on Emission Limit Values for Pollutants in Surface and Ground Waters andSediments and the Deadlines for their Reaching ("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 50/2012),
the Regulation on Limit Values of Priority Substances and Priority Hazardous Substances
Polluting Surface Waters, and the Deadlines for their Reaching ("Official Gazette of the RS",No. 24/2014), and the Rulebook on Parameters of Ecological and Chemical Status of Surface
Waters, and Parameters of Chemical and Quantitative Status of Ground Waters ("Official
Gazette of the RS" No. 74/2011), Annex 3, Type 1, Danube River, Ecological status classboundaries and boundary of ecological potential classes for surface water types;
The monitoring of groundwaters shall be carried out in accordance with the Regulation
on Emission Limit Values for Pollutants in Surface and Ground Waters and Sediments and the
Deadlines for their Reaching ("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 50/12) and the Regulation on
Limit Values of Pollutant, Harmful and Hazardous Substances in the Soil ("Official Gazette of
the RS", No. 30/2018) Annex 2: Remediation Values of Polluting, Harmful and Hazardous
Substances in the Aquifer;
Soil monitoring is carried out in accordance with the Regulation on Limit Values for
Polluting, Harmful and Hazardous Substances in the Soil ("Official Gazette of the RS", No.
30/2018), Annex 1: Limit, Maximum and Remediation Values of Polluting, Harmful andHazardous Substances in the Soil;
353_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-

Monitor the noise in accordance with the Rulebook on the Methods of Noise
Measurement, Content and Scope of the Noise Measurement Reports ("Official Gazette of RS"
No. 72/10) and the Regulation on Noise Indicators, Limit Values, Noise Indicators Assessment
Methods, Annoyance andHarmful Effects of Environmental Noise ("Official Gazette of the RS" No. 75/10);
Monitoring of waste shall be carried out in accordance with the Law on Waste
Management ("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 36/2009, 88/2010 and 14/2016), the Rulebook
on the Form of Waste Movement Document and Filling-in Instructions ("Official Gazette of
the RS", No. 72/09, 114/13) and the Rulebook on the Form of Hazardous Waste Movement
Document, the Template of the Previous Notification, Manner of Their Submission, andFilling-in Instructions ("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 17/2017);
Based on the aforementioned legislation, the main environmental factors are followed bymonitoring:
air
water
land andthe noise level in the environment

9.1. OVERVIEW OF THE STATE OF ENVIRONMENT BEFORE THE
COMMENCEMENT WITH PROJECT'S OPERATION AT LOCATIONSWHERE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IS EXPECTED
The state of the environment before the commencement with project's operation, in "zerostate", is described in detail in Chapter 5.0 - Overview of the state of environment on site andin its vicinity.

9.2.
PARAMETERS,LOCATIONSANDFREQUENCY
MEASUREMENT OF DETERMINED PARAMETERSOF

The frequency of monitoring and parameters of pollutants are defined by the aforementioned
legislation, for each listed environmental factor.
The Leading Contractor is obliged to develop a Monitoring Plan. The Monitoring Plan isenvisaged for a comprehensive project on the organization of the municipal waste landfill site
in Vinča. The Monitoring Plan contains (both for the period of the operation phase and for theperiod after the closure of the project) the monitoring of:-

Air quality
Concentration of pollutant emissions in the air
Quality and quantity of raw leachate waters (generated from the body of the landfill andcollected in leachate water lagoons)
Quality and quantity of treated leachate and other waters (prior to being discharged into
the recipient)
Quality and quantity of atmospheric waters
Quality of groundwater
Soil quality
Environmental noise level
Landfill stability, peripheral embankment and dam stability
Meteorological parameters and354_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-

Bird population

Considering that the subject of this study are planning units K2, K3, K4 and K5, in the text
below is an excerpt of the Monitoring Plan related to the Project in question.
Monitoring of leachate waters quality
The quantities of generated leachate waters are monitored monthly, during the phase oflandfill operation, and biannually, during the post-operational phase (after the closure of the
project). Levels of leachate waters are monitored at the bottom of the landfills (using
drainage wells/biothorns for biogas/leachate waters) and in the lagoons for leachate waters.

Parameters

Sampling location

Frequency
duringoperation
phase

Frequency post
operation phase

Monitoring thequantity ofleachate waters

Levels of assessed leachate waters in drainage wells.
Drainage wells forLevels of leachate waters in the lagoons for leachate
the collection ofwaters. The amount of leachate waters directed to treatment leachate waters and Monthly
plants.
biogas, leachatewater lagoons

Biannual

Flow rate ofleachate waters

Flow rate of leachate waters

Monthly

BiannualMonitoring of
raw leachatewatersOxidation-Reduction Potential Measurement, pH, Chemical
Oxygen Demand, Biological Oxygen Demand, Total
Dissolved Solids, Total Organic Carbon, Total
Hydrocarbons, Chlorides, Fluorides, Sulphates, Ammonia, Wastewater lagoons Quarterly
Nitrates, Nitrites, Total Phosphorus, Phosphates, Total
Metals, Total N, Conductivity, Phenols, Adsorbable
Organic Halogens (AOX), PCBs, PAHs

BiannualMonitoring oftreated leachatewaters (prior todischarging)

Volume and flowrate of discharged leachate waters

Treatment station
outletMonthly

Biannual

Temperature, pH, Chemical Oxygen Demand, Biological
Oxygen Demand, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Organic
Carbon, Total Hydrocarbons, Chlorides, Ammonia, Total
Phosphorus, Total Metals, Total N, Free Cyanide,
Conductivity, Phenols, Adsorbable Organic Halogens(AOX), Fluorides

Treatment station
outletMonthly

Quarterly

Rainfall intensity, temperature, sunlight rate, evaporation
rate, wind strength and direction, atmospheric humidity,
evapotranspiration (see also Meteorological Monitoring)

Weather station on
Daily
site

Meteorologicaldata

Lagoon inflow

Biannual

Surface waters monitoring
Internal atmospheric waters are collected on landfill covers, roads and platforms and aretaken by the collection and evacuation system to the lagoons for atmospheric waters (on theUpper and Lower platforms). The monitoring of internal atmospheric waters will be carriedout at the following locations:Upper lagoon for atmospheric waters355_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-

Lower lagoon for atmospheric waters

Sampling
location

Parameters

Temperature, pH, Conductivity, Chemical Oxygen
Demand, Biological Oxygen Demand, Total Dissolved
Solids, Total N
Upper and
Monitoring ofLower lagoon
atmospheric Temperature, pH, Redox Potential, Conductivity,forwaters quality Chemical Oxygen Demand, Biological Oxygen atmospheric
Demand, Total Organic Carbon, Total Dissolved
watersSolids, Chlorides, Fluorides, Phosphates, Total
Phosphorus, Total N, Ammonia, Nitrates, Nitrates, Free
Cyanide, Phenols, Total Hydrocarbons, Total Metals,
Adsorbable Organic Halogens (AOX)

Frequency
duringoperation
phase

Frequency post
operation phase

Quarterly (or if Biannual (or if pH
pH and/or
and/orconductivity
conductivity
values arevalues areinconsistent)
inconsistent)

AnnualAnnualPoints ofdischarge forupper andlower lagoon

Quarterly

Biannual

Discharged
Visual inspection in order to assess the possible
volumeofAtmosphericdamage, clogging or malfunctions
atmosphericwaterswatersQuarterly

BiannualAtmosphericwaters flow Flow rate
rate

Surveillance of the efficiency of surface waters drainage
Monthly controls, of all drainage channels and pipes for drainage of water and groundwateroutside and around the landfill complex, shall be performed monthly. The controls consist of:-visual inspections of all drainage channels;
measurement of the flow of water at the point of discharge of drainage pipes forgroundwater;
checking the functionality of rainwater drainage pipes during the rainy periods.

The results of these monthly checks will be published and shall serve to update the Action Planfor the implementation of mitigation measures with priority levels.
The annual video surveillance of the longest drainage pipes for drainage of leachate waters andgroundwater shall be carried out in order to check the integrity and functionality of the pipes. If
necessary, a cleaning procedure shall be carried out in order to prevent any stoppage orblockage.
Natural springs monitoring
Prior to the commencement with exploitation of the New Landfill and during works on theremediation of the "old" landfill, the initial state of the quality of the spring waters is reported.
The quality of natural springs around the landfill complex will be determined by taking
samples and analysing water. During operation, and especially at the commencement of thelandfill operation, the water will be sampled and analysed in order to compare its quality with356_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

the initial state (once per month, during the first year), and later at the quarterly basis. After thelandfill ceases its operation, during the first 5 years, water quality will be monitored every six
months, and later, after its closure, only if there is evidence on exceeding the defined values.
Groundwater monitoring
Based on previous geological investigations, it has been established that the sediments of the
Miocene era of horizontal expansion lie below the quaternary deposits. Given the slopes of theterrain in the landfill zone and downstream of the landfill, it could be assumed that the sameaquifer (which could be referred to as the other - deeper aquifer) does not have the same statuscontinuously throughout the complex.
In order to cover the entire subject area with a future groundwater monitoring network, shallow
and deep piezometers should be comprehensively considered, whether they are existing or if
new ones should be made.
In regards to the analysed situation and the conditions which have already been defined, theplan is for:-

Shallow piezometers (depths up to 30 m) to have the function of control points for thequality of the groundwater of the first aquifer in the zones: upstream of the future landfill,
between the future and the existing landfill and downstream of the entire landfill complex.
A deep piezometer, set upstream of the projected landfill, controls the quality of thewaters of the other aquifer that goes towards the landfill zone.
The medium deep piezometer, located between the future and existing landfill,controls the impact of the New Landfill on the deeper aquifer, while
The deep piezometer meter, downstream from the landfill complex, controls theimpact of the existing "old" landfill downstream and further impacts of the New Landfill on theother/deeper aquifer in this zone.
The function of the upstream piezometer is to control the water quality of the deeper aquifer,with the task of identifying possible pollution coming from the upstream direction (e.g. asphaltbase) that is not a result of the operation of the landfill.
Bearing in mind that the main purpose of the groundwater monitoring system is to monitor the
spread of potential pollutants - from soil surface to the aquifers - in a vertical direction, theproposed concept of piezometer layout is fully fulfilling its purpose.

357_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________Taking into account the results of the previously conducted hydrogeological investigations, aswell as all of the stated facts and previously defined conditions, it was concluded thatmonitoring activities will include 10 sampling points for both aquifers:
4 existing piezometers intended for monitoring of shallow aquifer, of which:••-three piezometers (PZ-5, PZ-6 i PZ-7) installed upstream from the new landfill location, andone piezometer (NP-11) installed downstream from the existing landfill body.

3 new piezometers with average depth up to 30 m, which will be installed with the
purpose of monitoring the shallow aquifer, of which:•••two piezometers will be installed within the zone between the new and the existing landfill, andone piezometer will be installed upstream of the exiting landfill’s body.

3 new deep piezometers intended for monitoring of other, deeper aquifer, of which:

1 deeper piezometer, intended for monitoring of the other aquifer, will be installed upstream of the newlandfill and will have maximum depth of cca 120 m or more to the static level of groundwater•
1 deeper piezometer, intended for monitoring of the other aquifer, will be installed upstream of theexisting landfill and downstream of the new landfill, i.e. within the zone between the two landfills, and will havemaximum depth of cca 100 m or more to the static level of groundwater•
1 deeper piezometer, intended for monitoring of the other aquifer, will be installed within the lowest
zone, downstream of the existing landfill and the entire complex, and will have maximum depth of cca 100 m or
more to the static level of groundwater.

The piezometer locations have been selected to provide permanent observation points with atimetable for construction - in accordance with the timetable for the construction of otherfacilities within the landfill complex.
All foreseen works will enable the possibility of defining the initial "baseline state" ofgroundwater quality in accordance with ISO 5667-2, Part 11, 1993, as well as by continuous
sampling and monitoring throughout the entire period of the landfill operation.
Field and laboratory work will be designed and implemented to ensure precise definition of theposition of both aquifers, as well as the zone to be isolated, in order to provide representative
samples from each of the aquifers.
Monitoring programme and parameters
Taking into account all the above, the Suez Group and Beo Clean Energy will perform a check of thebaseline state of groundwater quality prior to the commencement with the construction works (phase I baseline state) with a regular list of parameters, in accordance with the regulations on water quality Rulebook on Limit Values for Pollutants in Surface Waters and Groundwater and Sediments andDeadlines for their Reaching ("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 55/2005, 71/2005, 101/2007, 65/2008
and 16/2011), Rulebook on Determining the Status of Surface Waters and Groundwater ("Official
Gazette of the RS", No. 96/2010), Rulebook on Reference Conditions for Types of Surface Waters("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 67/2011), Rulebook on Parameters of Ecological and Chemical
Status of Surface Waters, and Parameters of Chemical and Quantitative Status of Groundwater("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 74/2011), as well as in accordance with the proposals of the Directive
2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection ofgroundwater against pollution and deterioration- - Part B Minimum list of pollutants and their indicators for which Member States have to consider theestablishment of limit values in accordance with Article 3 of the Regulation on Limit Values of
Pollutant, Harmful and Hazardous Substances in the Soil ("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 30/2018),
Annex 2

Restrictions on the remediation of pollutants, harmful and hazardous substances in aquifer, will
also be considered during the analysis of the results obtained.
358_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

As part of groundwater monitoring, five phases will be considered:-

Phase I: Fully determining the baseline state of groundwater quality before thecommencement of construction works,
Phase II: Until the start of the provision of temporary services (including operation
phase),
Phase IIa:
Operation phase (6-6 months),
Phase
Operation phase (after 6 months of operation),
IIIb:

359
_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-

Phase IV: Phase after completion of the works.
Parameters

Phase I

Phase II

Phase IIIa

Phase IIIb

Phase IV

Groundwater
qualityComplete analysis,
One time

Quarterly

Quarterly, every 15
days on at least 3
pointsEvery 6 months

Annually

Groundwater
quality

Temperature, pH,
Conductivity,
Redox Potential,
Dissolved
O2+,Chemical
Oxygen Demand(COD), Chlorine(Cl), Sodium(Na+), Pottasium(K+)

MonthlyMonthly

Groundwater
quality

Radioactivity
measured by Gammaspectrometry,
One time

Annually

Annually

Every 5 years

Every 5 years

Groundwaterlevel

One time

Quarterly

Quarterly, every 15
days at 3 points

Every 6 months

Annually

The list of parameters can be reduced at each phase, in accordance with the results of Phase I(they need to be defined after Phase I and define the actual baseline phase after the results of
the remediation project which runs in parallel). For example, in the case of positive
development of different parameters, during Phase
III - Operation Phase, it may be decided to "relax" the monitoring regime and focus only on thefollowing group of parameters:
Oxygen regime,
Salinity and hardness of water,
Metals.
The following groups of parameters are excluded from the monitoring range or their frequency
is reduced:
Organic substances,
Microbiology.
The Regulation defines that groundwater monitoring in the operation phase is carried out while
taking into account the defined baseline phase (Phase I) values as the benchmark values for thecomparison, in accordance with ISO 5667-2, Part 11, 1993.
Adjusting the monitoring programme:
360_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________-In the event of an increase in the frequency of changes in the groundwater level, thefrequency of sampling should be increased.
If a critical level of concentration of the parameters is reached, the frequency should bebased on the possibility of undertaking corrective measures between the two sampling, i.e. thefrequency must be determined on the basis of knowledge and estimation of the rate of flow ofgroundwater.
When a critical level of concentration of the parameters is reached, it is necessary to
perform a check-up by repeating the sampling. Once the concentration level is confirmed, themonitoring plan must be updated.
If the test results of the samples taken show that the values obtained exceed the limit values inaccordance with the defined limits, the adequate research shall be carried out in order to verify
the cause of these exceedings and whether the accident situation has occurred on the protective
layers of the landfill. In this case, in accordance with the the Rulebook on the Disposal ofWaste at Landfills, additional hydrogeological facilities (piezometers) shall be installed, taking
into account the hydrogeological conditions at the site.
Landfill stability monitoring
Total topographical surveys will be conducted every year at the landfill after operational
works, and at the final layer at the new landfill, and every month in the active area of
operation. Drone will be used to obtain data by using a topo-photogrammetric method.
The obtained data and reports are arranged annually, showing changes on waste cells,
including:- Primary compacting (mechanical compaction of waste during filling operations and selfcompacting of waste due to its own weight);
Secondary compacting (due to bio-degradation of waste);
Potential sliding of waste mass.

On the downstream slope of the old landfill, a topographical survey by a drone will becompleted by survey topographic criteria, because the stability of this zone is of primaryconcern for the stability of the old landfill and because the slight evolution of the topography
may hide the vegetation that will develop on the last top cover.

Topographic landmarks will be located:
At the top and on the berms of the downstream slope of the landfill, spaced 40 to 60
meters from each other;
At the top and on the berms of peripheral embankments (in the entire length on several
parts, spaced 50 to 100 meters apart at each level of monitoring: medium berms);
Surveying with a monitoring device will be conducted quarterly during the first two years andannually thereafter. The results will be processed in order to monitor the behaviour of thewaste body and anticipate any issue of stability.
361_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

If movement is detected, further research will be carried out to determine whether mitigation
and additional stabilization measures are required.
Moreover, the operational plan will be updated on an annual basis and will show the results ofactivities at the “old” and the new landfills, as follows:- surface filled with waste;- volume of waste;- disposal period and the lifetime of each cell;- the remaining capacity of the landfill.
Finally, an annual visual inspection is carried out to detect and report problems in respect ofintegrity or functionality of the landfill (holes, cracks, gas emissions, water stagnation,
reduction of the flora, development of deep roots...). The results of the annual survey will be
used to develop an Action Plan for measures to mitigate the effects of landfill operation.
Monitoring of the protective layer of landfill bottom for the new landfill
National regulations require the following: "The monitoring of the protective layers of thelandfill will be done continuously with sensors built in artificial waterproof coatings (ifinstalled), while the data will be monitored in the landfill laboratory. Monitoring of theprotective layers of the landfill will be carried out continuously during the exploitation of thelandfill, and after monitoring the exploitation data, monitoring and processing shall be carriedout at the intervals specified in the permit for the operation of the landfill."
In accordance with EU Directive (1999/31/CE on the landfill of waste), the protection of soil,
groundwater and surface is achieved by combining geological barrier (passive barrier) and thelower line (active barrier) during the operation/active phase. If the natural geological barrier
does not meet the above conditions, it will be artificially reinforced using geocomposite clay.
In addition to the above-described geological barriers, a system for collecting and evacuating
the leachate waters (HDPE line that is connected with the geocomposite for drainage ofleachate waters, drainage wells and drainage pipes will be added, to ensure that theaccumulation of water on the landfill will be minimal.
This dual system is designed to ensure that, if there is an occurrence in the active barrier, thepassive barrier will mitigate the risk of potential leakage.
Noise levels monitoring
Noise monitoring will be carried out in the wider area of the Vinča landfill complex, according
to the monitoring plan, with an annual frequency during the construction and operation phase.
Noise measurement will be carried out over a 24-hour period, and the results are comparedwith the noise thresholds regulated in Serbia.
Meteorological monitoring362_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Measurement of meteorological parameters is carried out in the manner stated in the following
table:
Parameters

Active phase

Passive phase

Amount of precipitation

Daily

Daily, monthly value is added

Temperature (min, max. at 14.00h)

DailyMonthly average

Speed and direction of air flow

Daily

Not necessary

Evaporation (lysimeter, or other method)

Daily

Daily, monthly value is added

Atmospheric humidity (at 14.00h)

DailyMonthly average

Measurements will be made by the weather station at the location, while the competentauthority does not require so in accordance with the Law and the Regulations on Waste
Disposal ("Official Gazette of the RS", No. 92/2010).
Bird population monitoring
A bird survey, which was launched during baseline state, should be continued during theconstruction and operation phase in order to assess the impact of the works and functioning.
The field methodology, observation points and methods of conclusion should be identical tothose in the baseline state or, if necessary, they can be adapted to scientific justifications.
Three stages will be considered for bird monitoring:-

Phase I: Updating the baseline state,
Phase II: Until commencement with temporary services (including the operation phase),
Phase III: Operation phase.

Parameters

Phase I

Phase II

Phase III

Identical as in baseline
state

Migration period 2018 andevery season after, until
Phase II

Seasons of nursing andnesting every year

One year-roundinvestigation (4investigations) after 5, 10
and 20 years363_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

10.0. NON-TECHNICAL OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY
The non-technical presentation of the data from individual chapters of the Study is given as aseparate, and represents an integral part of this Study.

11.0. DATA ON TECHNICAL DEFICIENCIES
During the preparation of the Study, no technical deficiencies were identified due to which theoperation of the Project would endanger the environment. Also, no lack of expertise and skills
in respect of designing and implementation of environmental protection measures has been
established.

12.0. BASES FOR STUDY DRAFTING
Legislation
Law on Environmental Protection (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 135/04, 36/09, 72/09 and 14/16);
Law on Environmental Impact Assessment (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 135/04, 36/09, 72/09 and43/11 - CC decision and 14/2016);
Law on Planing and Construction (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 72/09, 81/09-corr., 64/10-CC
decision, 24/11, 121/12, 42/13-CC decision, 50/13-CC decision, and 98/13-CC decision, 132/2014 and 145/2014,23/15);
Law on Soil Protection (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 112/15);
Law on Water (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 30/10, 93/12 and 101/16);
Law on Water Regime (“Official Gazette of the FRY”, No. 59/98 and “Official Gazette of the RS”, No.
105/05);
Law on Air Protection (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 36/09 and 10/13);
Law on Chemicals (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 36/2009, 88/10, 92/11, 93/12 and 25/15);
Law on Waste Management “Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 36/2009, 88/2010, 14/2016 and 95/2018 other law);
Law on Packaging and Packaging Waste (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 39/09);
Law on Protection from Noise Pollution (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 36/09, 88/10);
Law on Nature Conservation (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 36/09, 88/10, and 91/10 - corr. 14/2016);
Law on Cultural Property (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 71/94)
Law on Fire Protection (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 111/09 and 20/15);
Law on Standardization (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 36/09);
Law on Flammable Liquids and Combustible Fuel Gases “Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 54/15);
Law on Integrated Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No.
135/04 and25/15);
Law on Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 135/04 and88/10);
Occupational Health and Safety Law (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 101/05, 91/15 and 113 of 17/17);
Rulebook on Contents of the Environmental Impact Assessment Study (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No.
69/05);
Rulebook on the Manner and Conditions for Measuring the Quantities and Examining the Quality ofWaste Water, and the Contents of Reports on Performed Measurements (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 33/16);
Regulation on the Designation of Surface Water and Groundwater Bodies (“Official Gazette of the RS”,
No. 96/10);
Rulebook on Parameters of Ecological and Chemical Status of Surface Waters, and Parameters ofChemical and Quantitative Status of Ground Waters (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No.

364_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Rulebook on the Method of Determining and Maintaining Sanitary Protection Zones of Water Supply
Sources (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No 92/08);
Rulebook on Determining Melioration Areas and their Boundaries (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No.
38/11);
Regulation on Determining Water Units and their Boundaries (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 8/18);
Rulebook on the Methods of Noise Measurement, Contents and Scope of the NoiseMeasurement Reports(“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 72/10);
Rulebook on the Form of Waste Movement Document and Filling-in Instructions (“Official Gazette of
the RS”, No. 72/09, 114/13);
Rulebook on the Form of Hazardous Waste Movement Document, the Form of Prior Notification, theManner of their Submission and Filling-in Instructions (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 17/2017);
Rulebook on the Waste Categories, Examination and Classification (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No.
56/10);
Rulebook on the Form of a Daily Record and Annual Waste Report, with the Filling-in Instructions(“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 95/2010, 88/2015);
Rulebook on Forms of Reports on Packaging and Packaging Waste Management (“Official Gazette of
the RS”, No. 21/2010);
Rulebook on Amendments to the Rulebook on Forms of Reports on Packaging and Packaging Waste
Management (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 10/2013);
Rulebook on Technical Standards for Access Roads, Turners and Arranged Plateaus for Firefighting
Vehicles in the Vicinity of an Increased Risk of Fire (“Official Gazette of the SFRY”, No. 8/95);
Rules on Technical Standards for Fire Hydrant Network (“Official Gazette of the SFRY”, No. 30/91);
Rulebook on Technical Standards for the Protection of Objects from Atmospheric Discharges (“Official
Gazette of the FRY”, No.
11/96);
Rulebook on Technical Standards for Protection of Electric Power Plants and Devices against Fire(“Official Gazette of the SFRY”, No. 74/90);
Rulebook on Technical Standards for Stable Fire Alarm Installations (“Official Gazette of the SFRY”,
No. 87/93);
Rulebook on Preventive Measures for Safe and Healthy Work in the Use of Work Equipment (“Official
Gazette of the RS”, No. 23/09, 123/12 and 102/15);
Rulebook on Preventive Measures for Safe and Healthy Work during the Use of Personal Protective
Equipment and Devices (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 92/08);
SRPS EN 2 (sr) - 2011 Fire classification;
SRPS Z.C0.005 - 1979 Classification of materials and goods depending on their behaviour in a fire;
SRPS Z.C0.012 - 1980 Categories and grades identification of the fire hazards of materials;
SRPS U.J1.220 - 1981 Fire protection - Standard symbols for designs;
SRPS U.J1.240 - 1995 Fire protection in civil engineering - Stage of the fire resistance of a building;
SRPS TP19 2003 Technical recommendation for structural fire protection in industrial buildings Analytically required fire resistancetime
Rulebook on the Limits of Exposure to Non-Ionizing Radiation (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No.
104/09)Rulebook on Conditions, Manner and Procedure for Waste Oils Management (“Official Gazette of theRS”, No. 71/10)
Rulebook on the List of Hazardous Substances and their Amounts and Criteria for Determining the Typeof Documents Produced by the Operator of Seveso Installation or Establishment (“Official Gazette of the RS”,
No. 41/10, 51/15)
Rulebook on Technical Standards for the Construction of High-rise Buildings in Seismic Areas(“Official Gazette of the SFRY”, No. 31/81, 49/82, 29/83, 21/88 and 52/90)
Rulebook on Technical Standards for Installation of Hydrant Fire Extinguishing Network (“Official
Gazette of the RS”, No. 3/2018)
Rulebook on the Methodology for the Development of Rehabilitation and Remediation Projects(“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 74/2015)
Rulebook on Hazardous Substances in Waters (“Official Gazette of the FRS”, No. 31/82),

365_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Regulation on Reference Conditions of Surface Water Types (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 67/11),
Regulation on Emission Limit Values for Pollutants in Surface and Ground Waters and Sediments andthe Deadlines for their Reaching (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 50/12);
Regulation on Limit Values of Priority Substances and Priority Hazardous Substances Polluting Surface
Waters, and the Deadlines for their Reaching (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 24/14);
Regulation on the Amount of Water Fees (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 14/18);
Regulation on Emission Limit Values for Pollutants in Waters and the Deadlines for their Reaching(“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 67/11, 48/12 and 1/16);
Regulation on Limit Values of Pollutant, Harmful and Hazardous Substances in the Soil (“Official
Gazetteof the RS”, No. 30/2018);
Regulation on Measurements of Air Pollutant Emissions from Stationary Sources ofPollution (“Official
Gazette of the RS”, No. 5/16);
Regulation on Limit Values of Air Pollutant Emissions from Combustion Installations (“Official Gazetteof the RS”, No. 6/16);
Regulation on Limit Values of Air Pollutant Emissions from Stationary Sources of Pollution, Except
from Combustion Installations (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 111/15);
Regulation on Noise Indicators, Limit Values, Noise Indicator Assessment Methods, Annoyance andHarmful Effects of Environmental Noise (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 75/10).
Regulation on Disposal of Waste on Landfills (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No.92/10)
Regulation on Types of Activities and Installations for which Integrated Permits are Issued (“Official
Gazette of the RS”, No. 84/05)

List of technical documentation
Book(Volume)Book 0VolumeIdent. No.

The main volume17048-IDP-00

Volume 1/1

Architectural Project - Plateau of the crushing plant

17048-IDP-01-01

Volume 1/2

Architectural Project - Operational Plateau

17048-IDP-01-02

Volume 2/1

Construction Project - Landfill Complex ’’Vinča’’17048-IDP-02-01

Volume 2/2

Construction Project - Plateau of the crushing plant

17048-IDP-02-02

Volume 2/3

17048-IDP-02-03

Volume 2/5

Construction Project - Operational Plateau
net
Construcwor
rehabilitate
tion
Project - Biogas
k from the body of the d existing
landfill
Construction Project - Biogas network from the body of the new sanitary
landfillBook 2/6

Roads Project - Landfill Complex ’’Vinča’’17048-IDP-02-06

Volume 2/7

Roads Project - Plateau of the crushing plant

17048-IDP-02-07

Volume 2/8

Roads Project - Operational Plateau

17048-IDP-02-08

Volume 2/9Construction Project - Torch System

17048-IDP-02-09

Volume 2/10

Roads Project - Torch System

17048-IDP-02-10

Volume 2/4

Book 3/1

Volume 3/2

Hydrotechnical Installation Project - Entrance, weighbridges, utility paths
with water supply infrastructure, fire protectionand faecal
sewerage
Hydrotechnical Installation Project - Peripheral channelsoutside the bodyof the landfills

17048-IDP-02-04
17048-IDP-02-05

17048-IDP-03-01

17048-IDP-03-02

366_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Volume 3/3

17048-IDP-03-03

Volume 3/4

Hydrotechnical Installation Project - New landfill andinert landfill
Hydrotechnical Installation Project - Rehabilitation of theold landfill

Volume 3/5

Hydrotechnical Installation Project - Upper platform

17048-IDP-03-05

Volume 3/6

Hydrotechnical Installation Project - Lower platform

17048-IDP-03-06

Volume 3/7

Hydrotechnical Installation Project - Plateau of the crushing plant

17048-IDP-03-07

Volume 3/8

Hydrotechnical Installation Project - Operational Plateau
BiogasHydrotechnical Installation Project - network from thelandfill

17048-IDP-03-08

Volume 3/9

Volume 3/10
Volume 4/1

Volume 4/2

Volume 4/3
Book(Volume)Hydrotec
hnical Installation Projectsanitary landfill- Biogas network

17048-IDP-03-04

body of thefrom body of thethenewElectricity Installations Project - Transformer stations TS1,TS2 and TS3
Electricit
IlluminationyInstallations
Projectofroads

rehabilitated existing

17048-IDP-03-10
17048-IDP-04-01

internal

Electricity Installations Project - Entrance zone,
water supply and fire protection facilities and lagoons on the upper andlower
platforms
Volume17048-IDP-04-02

17048-IDP-04-03
Ident. No.

Volume 4/4

Electricity Installations Project - Plateau of the crushing plant

17048-IDP-04-04

Volume 4/5

Electricity Installations Project - Operational Plateau
Electricity Installations Project - Biogas network from thebody of therehabilitated existing
landfill

17048-IDP-04-05

Volume 4/6

17048-IDP-04-06

Volume 4/7

Electricity Installations Project - Biogas network from the body of thesanitary landfill

17048-IDP-04-07

Volume 4/8

Electricity Installations Project - Torch System

30/18- 02 -IDP-4/8

Volume 5/1

Telecommunication and Signalling Installations Project - Landfill

17048-IDP-05-01

Volume 5/2

17048-IDP-05-02

Volume 5/4

Telecommunication and Signalling Installations Project - Input zone
Telecommunication and Signalling Installations Project - Plateau of thecrushing
plant
Telecommunication and Signalling Installations Project - Operational
Plateau

Volume 6/1

Mechanical Installations Project - Water supply

17048-IDP-06-01

Volume 6/2

Mechanical Installations Project - Upper platform

17048-IDP-06-02

Volume 6/3

Mechanical Installations Project - Lower platform

17048-IDP-06-03

Volume 6/4

Mechanical Installations Project - Plateau of the crushing plant

17048-IDP-06-04

Volume 5/3

17048-IDP-05-03
17048-IDP-05-04

367_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Volume 6/5

Volume 6/6

Volume 6/7

Volume 6/8

Volume 6/9
Volume 7/1
Volume 7/2
Volume 7/3

Mechanical Installations Project - Operational Plateau -Heating,ventilation andair conditioning
Mechani Installation
Plateaucals
Project- Operational
Mechanical fluid
distributi
onMechani Installation
Biogascal
sProject-networkfromthe body of therehabilitated existing
landfill
Mechanical Installations Project - Biogas network from the body of thenewsanitary
landfill
Mechanical Installations Project - Torch
SystemTechnology Project - New landfill First Phase, Phase Two,Phase Three,inert landfill
Technology Project - Remediation of the oldlandfill

17048-IDP-06-05

17048-IDP-06-06

17048-IDP-06-07

17048-IDP-06-08

30/18- 02 -IDP-6/9
17048-IDP-07-01
17048-IDP-07-02
17048-IDP-07-03

Volume 7/5

Technology Project - Plateau of the crushing plantTechnol
network fromogy
Project- Biogass the
body of therehabilit
atedexisting
landfill
Technology Project - Biogas network from the body of the new sanitary
landfill

Volume 8

Transport and Traffic Signalization Project

17048-IDP-08

Volume 9

Project of External Arrangement - Protective Green Belt, landscaping,fence17048-IDP-09

Volume 7/4

Study

Fire Protection Study - Landfill complex ’’Vinča’’StudyFire Protection Study - Torch System

Book(Volume)Volume17048-IDP-07-04

17048-IDP-07-05

P-21/19
30/18-02-IDP-E

Ident. No.

DELTA INŽENJERING DOO, BELGRADE 2019.
0Main volume, Treatment of leachate waters

31/18-01-E-0.1

2/1.1

Construction Project

31/18-01-IDP-2/1.1

3/1

Hydrotechnical Installation Project

31/18-01-IDP-3/1

4/1.1

Electricity Installations Project

31/18-01-IDP-4/1.1

368_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________
4/2

Management, Measurement and Regulation Project

31/18-01-IDP-4/2

6/1.1

Mechanical Installations and Equipment Project

31/18-01-IDP-6/1.1

7/1

Technology Project

31/18-01-IDP-7/1

PZI

HIDROZAVOD DTD, NOVI SAD, 2018.
Project of Landfill Landslide Remediation and Stabilization of part of the
Landfill ’’Vinča’’0Main volume

Е – 116/17-4

1

Supporting Structure ProjectЕ – 116/17-4

2

Construction ProjectЕ – 116/17-4

3

Hydrotechnical Installation ProjectЕ – 116/17-4

10Preparatory Works ProjectЕ – 116/17-4

Legal acts

-

-

-

"EPS Distribucija" Belgrade/Center, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP-7/2019, dated 8 April
2019.
JSC "Elektromreža Srbije", ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP-6/2019, dated 29 March 2019.
PUC "Belgrade Waterworks and Sewerage" - Waterworks, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP8/2019, dated 28 March 2019.
PUC "Belgrade Waterworks and Sewerage" - Sewerage, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP9/2019, dated 28 March 2019.
PUC "Belgrade Waterworks and Sewerage" - protection of water sources, ROP-MSGI-5396LOC-1-HPAP-10/2019, dated 28 March 2019.
JSC "Telekom Srbija", ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP-2/2019, dated 1 April 2019.
PUC "Gradska čistoća", ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-7-HPAP-11/2019, dated 26 March 2019.
Belgrade City Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1HPAP-17/2019, dated 29 March 2019.
Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP-16/2019,
dated 5 April 2019.
MoI Belgrade, Emergency Management Sector, Emergency Management Directorate inBelgrade, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOCH-2-HPAP-1/2019, dated 12 April 2019.
MoI Belgrade, Emergency Management Sector, Emergency Management Directorate inBelgrade, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOCH-2-HPAP-2/2019, dated 12 April 2019.
Belgrade Secretariat for Environmental Protection, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP-5/2019,
dated 27 March 2019.

369_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

-

-

-

-

Ministry of Defence of Serbia, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP-15/2019, dated 26 March
2019.
Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of Serbia, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP14/2019, dated 27 March 2019 and ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP-14/2019, dated 27 March
2019.
Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of Serbia, ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP14/2019, dated 27 March 2019 and ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP-19/2019, dated 27 March
2019.
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management - Republic Water Directorate,
ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP-3/2019 of 25 March 2019.
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management - Republic Water Directorate,
ROP-MSGI-5396-LOC-1-HPAP-21/2019, dated 3 April 2019.
Ministry of Health, Sector for Sanitary Control, Department of370_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

_________________________________________________________________________________________

APPENDICES
are given under Volume 2 - Legal acts and drafts, September
2019, and form an integral part of the Study371_______________________________________________________________________________________ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY