第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム

Zen 4 アーキテクチャ搭載
AMD EPYC™ (Genoa) の技術概要
2022年12月5日
日本AMD株式会社大原久樹 (Hisaki.Ohara@amd.com)

1本日の内容1. AMD EPYC™プロセッサーのこれまでのロードマップ
2. Zen 4 アーキテクチャ
3. 第4世代AMD EPYC™ プラットフォーム
4. 性能のご紹介

2

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

All roadmaps are subject to change.

3

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

See Endnotes EPYC-032, EPYC-034A, SP5-013A, SP5-014. Preliminary data and projections subject to change

4

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

SPECrate®2017_int_base5

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

SPECrate®2017_fp_base

See endnotes: SP5-001C, -002C, -005C.

SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM max-jOPS

6

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

“Illustrative use only”

9

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

See endnote: EPYC-038

32K I-Cache
8 way

Branch Prediction

DecodeOp Cache••

Micro-op Queue
4 instructions/cycle•••

9 macro-ops/cycle
6 ops dispatched

Floating Point

Integer•

Integer Rename

Floating Point Rename••

Scheduler

Scheduler

Scheduler

Scheduler

Scheduler

Scheduler••

Integer Physical Register FileFP Register File

•
ALU
BR

•

AGU

ALU

AGU

ALU

AGU

ALU

BR

F2I
ST

MUL
MAC

ADD

MUL
MAC

ADD

ST

•
•

•
•

10

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

Load/Store
Queues32K D-Cache
8 Way

1MB L2 (I+D) Cache
8 Way

*“Zen 3” and “Zen 4” store up to two branches per BTB entry

11

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

•
•
•
•
•
•

•
•

12

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

13

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

•
•

•
•
•
•

•

•

•

•

PCIe Gen 5
CXL1.1+•Gen 3 Infinity
FabricDDR 5

IOD

SecureProcessor

•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•

1 With certain DIMM population rules.. GD-183: AMD Infinity Guard features vary by EPYC™ Processor generations. Infinity Guard security features must be enabled by server OEMs and/or Cloud Service Providers to operate. Learn more about Infinity Guard at https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/infinity-guard.

GMI

Fabric + IO
32G
SERDES

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

“P” links
PCIe
CXL

PCIe 3(6 Lanes)“G” links

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

32G
SERDES

Fabric + IO
32G
SERDES

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

“P” links
PCIe
CXL

PCIe 3(6 Lanes)

PCIe
CXL

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

D5

GMI

D5

Z4

GMI

D5

L2

PCIe

GMI

D5

6x DDR5

D5

Z4

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

GMI

D5

GMI

GMI

D5

L2

L2

~8G

D5

Z4

Z4

USB

D5

32G
SERDES

USB

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

“P” links

•
•
•
•

D5

L2

L2

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

~8G

~8G

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

USB

D5

32G
SERDES

D5

GMI

Fabric + IO

D5

D5

Z4

32 MB
L3

Z4

6x DDR5D5

D56x DDR5

6x DDR5D5

6x DDR5D532G
SERDES

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

GMI

GMI

D5

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

L2

GMI

Zen4
Zen4
Zen4

Z4

L2

6x DDR5“G” links

L2

GMI“G” links

Z4

PCIe3
(8 Lanes)Perf Determinism Mode illustration

Normalized

Normalized Power•

Normalized Performance

1

•

Max

 System and Silicon Margin →MinPower Determinism Mode illustration

Normalized

•

•

1

•

Max

•

 System and Silicon Margin →Min

Acheiveable Fmax as % of Fmax Illustration

•

100%
98%
96%

•

94%

•

92%
96

•

72

60

48

36

Active cores

•
16

84

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

24

12

1

2x Xeon 8380 (4431 GFLOPS)

DGEMM
Performance Determinism Mode
17

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

HPL
Performance Determinism ModeSee Endnotes SP5-086 / SP5-087.

18

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•
•

•

•
•
•

•

19

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

20

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

2.40/3.70
2.25/3.70
3.10/3.75

2.45/3.70▪
▪
▪

2.75/3.80

3.25/3.80
2.70/3.90▪
▪

2.90/4.15
2.50/3.70▪
▪

21

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

3.00/3.70*SEE ENDNOTES: EPYC-018, GD-183

22

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

Results May Vary. See Endnotes SP5-010B.

23

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

Results May Vary. See Endnotes SP5-009C.

24

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

Results may vary. As of 11/10/2022 ,see endnotes SP5-033, -035A, -037.

ANSYS® Applications on AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors

75F3: 32C, 2.95/4.00GHz, 280W

9374F: 32C, 3.85/4.30GHz, 320W
9554: 64C, 3.10/3.75GHz, 360W

https://www.amd.com/system/files/documents/epyc-9004-pb-ansys-generational.pdf
25

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

26

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

References• AMD EPYC™ Server Processors•

https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-server-cpu-family• AMD EPYC™ Server Performance Tuning Guides•

High Performance Computing Tuning Guide for AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors••

https://www.amd.com/system/files/documents/58002-epyc-9004-tg-hpc.pdf

High Performance Toolchain: Compilers, Libraries & Profilers Tuning Guide for AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors•

https://www.amd.com/system/files/documents/58020-epyc-9004-tg-high-perf-toolchain.pdf• AMD EPYC™ Tech Docs and White Papers•

https://www.amd.com/en/processors/server-tech-docs• AMD Optimizing C/C++ and Fortran Compilers (AOCC)•

https://developer.amd.com/amd-aocc/• AMD Optimizing CPU Libraries (AOCL)•

https://developer.amd.com/amd-aocl/• AMD μProf•

https://developer.amd.com/amd-uprof/• Pre-built-applications•
27

https://developer.amd.com/applications/pre-built-applications/

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

ENDNOTESEPYC-18: Max boost for AMD EPYC processors is the maximum frequency achievable by any single core on the processor under normal operating conditions for server systems.
EPYC-028B: SPECpower_ssj® 2008, SPECrate®2017_int_energy_base, and SPECrate®2017_fp_energy_base based on results published on SPEC’s website as of 11/10/22. VMmark® server power-performance (PPKW) based results published athttps://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results3x.1.html?sort=score. The first 74 ranked SPECpower_ssj®2008 publications with the highest overall efficiency overall ssj_ops/W results were all powered by AMD EPYC processors. For SPECrate®2017 Integer(Energy Base), AMD EPYC CPUs power the first 4 of 5 SPECrate®2017_int_energy_base performance/system W scores. For SPECrate®2017 Floating Point (Energy Base), AMD EPYC CPUs power the first 8 of 9 SPECrate®2017_fp_energy_base performance/system Wscores. For VMmark® server power-performance (PPKW), have the top two results for 2- and 4-socket matched pair results outperforming all other socket results. See https://www.amd.com/en/claims/epyc3x#faq-EPYC-028B for the full list.
EPYC-032: AMD EPYC 9004 CPUs support 12 channels of up to 4800 MHz DDR5 memory which is 460.8 GB/s of maximum memory throughput per socket. Intel Scalable “Ice Lake” CPUs support 8 channels of up to 3200 MHz DDR 4 (per https://ark.intel.com/) have amaximum 204.8 GB/s. EPYC 9004 CPUs have 2.25x the memory throughput per CPU. 460.8 ÷ 204.8 = 2.25x the max throughput or 125% more max throughput.
EPYC-034A: AMD EPYC 9004 CPUs can support 12 memory channels with 2 DPC (DIMMs / channel) 12 x 2 = 24 DIMM slots x 256GB DIMMs = 6,144GB of standard DRAM (DDR) memory or 6TB per CPU. The highest supported total memory (not just DRAM) on
https://ark.intel.com/ is the Intel Xeon Ice Lake is 6 TB per CPU - but with standard DRAM the limit is 4TB: 8 memory channels x 2 DPC = 16 total DIMM slots x 256GB DIMMs = 4,096GB of DRAM (DDR) memory, or 4TB per CPU. EPYC 9004 Series supports 50% more
DRAM than Intel Ice Lake CPUs.
EPYC-38: Based on AMD internal testing as of 09/19/2022, geomean performance improvement at the same fixed-frequency on a 4th Gen AMD EPYC™ 9554 CPU compared to a 3rd Gen AMD EPYC™ 7763 CPU using a select set of workloads (33) including est.
SPECrate®2017_int_base, est. SPECrate®2017_fp_base, and representative server workloads.
GD-83: Use of third-party marks / logos/ products is for informational purposes only and no endorsement of or by AMD is intended or implied.
GD-183: AMD Infinity Guard features vary by EPYC™ Processor generations. Infinity Guard security features must be enabled by server OEMs and/or Cloud Service Providers to operate. Check with your OEM or provider to confirm support of these features. Learn more
about Infinity Guard at https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/infinity-guard.
SP5-001C: SPECrate®2017_int_base comparison based on published results as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (1790 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 192 total cores, www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221024-32607.html) vs. 2P AMD
EPYC 7763 (861 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 128 total cores, www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q4/cpu2017-20211121-30148.html).
SP5-002C: SPECrate®2017_fp_base comparison based on published results as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (1480 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 192 total cores, www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221024-32605.html) vs. 2P AMD
EPYC 7763 (663 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 128 total cores, www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q4/cpu2017-20211121-30146.html). ormation.
SP5-005C: SPECjbb® 2015-MultiJVM Max comparison based on published results as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (815459 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM max-jOPS, 356204 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM critical-jOPS, 192 total cores,
http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2022q4/jbb2015-20221019-00861.html) vs. 2P AMD EPYC 7763 (420774 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM max-jOPS, 165211 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM critical-jOPS, 128 total cores,
http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2021q3/jbb2015-20210701-00692.html). ormation.
SP5-008: 4th Gen EPYC CPUs (96c) support up to 12 channels of DDR5-4800 memory (460.8 GB/s) versus 3rd Gen EPYC CPUs (64c) that support up to 8 channels of DDR4-3200 (240.8 GB/s) memory.
SP5-009C: SPECrate®2017_fp_base based on published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (1480 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 192 total cores, www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221024-32605.html) is
2.52x the performance of published 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (587 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 160 total cores, www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221010-32542.html).Published 2P AMD EPYC 7763 (663 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 128 Total Cores,
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q4/cpu2017-20211121-30146.html) is shown at 1.13x for reference. SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.

28

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

ENDNOTES
SP5-010B: SPECrate®2017_int_base based on published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (1790 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 192 total cores, www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221024-32607.html)
is 2.97x the performance of published 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (602 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 80 total cores, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-20210521-26364.html). Published 2P AMD EPYC 7763 (861 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 128 totalcores, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q4/cpu2017-20211121-30148.html) is shown at 1.43x for reference. SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more
information. NOTE: Red text only needs to be included with charts that show the 7763.
SP5-011B: SPECpower_ssj®2008 comparison based on published 2U, 2P Windows® results as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (27501 overall ssj_ops/W, 2U, http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2022q4/power_ssj2008-2022102001194.html) vs. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (13670 overall ssj_ops/W, 2U, http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2022q4/power_ssj2008-20220926-01184.html). 2P AMD EPYC 7763 (23505 overall ssj_ops/W, 2U,
http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2021q2/power_ssj2008-20210324-01091.html) shown at 1.72x for reference. SPEC® and SPECpower_ssj® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for
more information. NOTE: Red text only needs to be included with charts that show the 7763.
SP5-012B: SPECjbb® 2015-MultiJVM Max based on published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (815459 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM max-jOPS, 356204 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM critical-jOPS, 192 Total Cores,
http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2022q4/jbb2015-20221019-00861.html) is 2.85x the performance of published 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (286125 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM max-jOPS, 152057 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM critical-jOPS, 80 Total Cores,
http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2021q4/jbb2015-20211006-00706.html). 2P AMD EPYC 7763 (420774 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM max-jOPS, 165211 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM critical-jOPS, 128 total cores,
http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2021q3/jbb2015-20210701-00692.html) shown at 1.47x for reference. SPEC® and SPECjbb® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information. NOTE:
Red text only needs to be included with charts that show the 7763.
SP5-013A: 96-core EPYC 9654 CPU processors results as of 11/10/2022 using SPECrate®2017_int_base. The AMD EPYC scored 1790 SPECrate®2017_int_base which is higher than all other 2P scores published on the SPEC® website. 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (1790
SPECrate®2017_int_base, 192 total cores, www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221024-32607.html). SPEC®, SPECrate® and SPEC CPU® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more
information.
SP5-014: Estimated 16-core 4th Gen EPYC CPU processors results as of 08/31/2022 using SPECrate®2017_int_base. The AMD EPYC scored ~418 or ~13.06/core (measured on AMD internal reference platform and marked estimate per SPEC Fair Use) which is higher
performance-per-core than all other 2P scores published on the SPEC® website. SPEC®, SPECrate® and SPEC CPU® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.
SP5-015A: SPECrate®2017_int_base comparison is based on a compliant ASUSTeK run and published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Comparison of compliant 2P AMD EPYC 9474F (1090 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 64 Total Cores, compliant run
ASUSTeK RS700A-E12, 1536 GB - 24x 64 GB 2Rx4 PC5-4800B-R, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4, AOCC 4.0) is 1.81x the performance (51% per core adjusted) of published 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (602 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 540 Total TDP W, $17332
Total CPU $, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-20210521-26364.html). Published 2P AMD EPYC 7643 (683 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 450 Total TDP W, 96 Total Cores, $9990 Total CPU $, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q3/cpu201720210831-29186.html. SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.
SP5-016A: SPECrate®2017_int_base comparison is based on a compliant ASUSTeK run and published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Comparison of compliant 2P AMD EPYC 9374F (815 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 64 Total Cores, compliant run
ASUSTeK RS700A-E12, 1536 GB - 24x 64 GB 2Rx4 PC5-4800B-R, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4, AOCC 4.0) is 1.55x the performance of published 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8362 (526 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 64 Total Cores,
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q3/cpu2017-20210802-28469.html). Published 2P AMD EPYC 75F3 (596 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 64 Total Cores, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-20210409-25541.html) is shown for reference. SPEC®,
SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.
SP5-018A: SPECrate®2017_int_base comparison based on a compliant ASUSTeK run and published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Comparison of compliant 2P AMD EPYC 9174F (428 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 32 Total Cores, compliant run ASUSTeK
RS700A-E12, 1536 GB - 24x 64 GB 2Rx4 PC5-4800B-R, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4, AOCC 4.0) is 1.47x the performance of published 2P Intel Xeon Gold 6346 (291 SPECrate®2017_int_base, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q2/cpu2017-2022041931532.html). Published 2P AMD EPYC 73F3 (352 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 480 Total TDP W, 32 Total Cores, $7042 Total CPU $, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q4/cpu2017-20211207-30371.html) shown at 1.2x for reference. SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, andSPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.
SP5-021A: As of 11/10/2022, the Intel exponential trendline from top SPECrate®2017_int_base published scores to date for 2P 1st, 2nd and 3rd Gen Intel based Xeon SP (LGA socketed) servers for each of 2015-2022 (expected). The AMD log trendline from top
SPECrate®2017_int_base published score to date, for 2P Intel based AMD EPYC servers for each of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and as of claim date for 2022. The lines below are organized as: Year, CPU model, SPEC score, URL. Intel: 2017, Intel Xeon Platinum
8180, 302, https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2017q4/cpu2017-20170928-00070.pdf; 2018, Intel Xeon Platinum 8180, 304, https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2018q3/cpu2017-20180709-07701.pdf; 2019, Intel Xeon Platinum 8280L, 364, should be 8280Lhttps://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190429-12779.pdf; 2020, Intel Xeon Gold 6258R, 397, https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q3/cpu2017-20200915-23981.pdf; 2021, Intel Xeon Platinum 8380, 602,
https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-20210521-26364.html; 2022, Intel Xeon Platinum 8380, 602, https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-20210521-26364.html. AMD: 2017, AMD EPYC 7601, 275,
https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2017q4/cpu2017-20171211-01594.pdf; 2018, EPYC 7601, 282, https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2018q3/cpu2017-20180827-08666.pdf; 2019, EPYC 7742, 701, https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu201720191125-20001.pdf; 2020, EPYC 7H12, 717, https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q2/cpu2017-20200525-22554.pdf; 2021, EPYC 7763, 861, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q4/cpu2017-20211121-30148.html; 2022, EPYC 9654, 1790,
www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221024-32607.html; SPEC®, SPECrate® and SPEC CPU® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.
29

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

ENDNOTES
SP5-022: Neural Magic measured results on AMD reference systems as of 9/29/2022. Configurations:2P EPYC 9654 “Titanite” vs. 2P EPYC 7763 “DaytonaX” running on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Python 3.9.13, pip==22.12/deepsparse==1.0.2. BERT-Large Streaming
Throughput items/sec (seq=384, batch 1, 48 streams, INT8 + sparse) using SQuAD v1.1 dataset; ResNet50 Batched Throughput items/sec (batch 256, single-stream, INT8 sparse) using ImageNet dataset; YOLOv5s Streaming Throughput ([image 3, 640, 640], batch
1, multi-stream, per-stream latency <=33ms) using COCO dataset. Testing not independently verified by AMD.
SP5-023: Estimated SPECrate®2017_int_base comparison based on internal AMD reference platform measurements/projections and best published scores at www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. AMD internal measurements or projections* 2x AMD EPYC 9654 1550,
2x AMD EPYC 9634 1325*, 2x AMD EPYC 9554 1250, 2x AMD EPYC 9534 1070, 2x AMD EPYC 9474F 1040, 2x AMD EPYC 9454 820, *2x AMD EPYC 9374F 765, 2x AMD EPYC 9354 700, 2x AMD EPYC 9334 645, 2x AMD EPYC 9274F 550, *2x AMD EPYC 9254 480*, 2x
AMD EPYC 9224 450, 2x AMD EPYC 9174F 419, 2x AMD EPYC 9124 340. Referenced: 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (602 SPECrate®2017_int_base, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-20210521-26364.html) and 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8362 (526SPECrate®2017_int_base, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q3/cpu2017-20210802-28469.html) SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.
OEM published scores will vary based on system configuration and determinism mode used (default cTDP performance profile except EPYC 9654/9554 cTDP=400W)
SP5-024A: SPECrate®2017_fp_base comparison is based on a compliant ASUSTeK run and published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Comparison of compliant 2P AMD EPYC 9474F (1110 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 96 Total Cores, compliant run
ASUSTeK RS700A-E12, 1536 GB - 24x 64 GB 2Rx4 PC5-4800B-R, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4, AOCC 4.0) is 1.89x the performance (78% per core adjusted) of published 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (587 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 540 Total TDP W, $17332
Total CPU $, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221010-32542.html). Published 2P AMD EPYC 7643 (576 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 450 Total TDP W, 96 Total Cores, $9990 Total CPU $, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q4/cpu201720210928-29636.html) shown at 0.98x for reference. SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.
SP5-025A: SPECrate®2017_fp_base comparison is based on a compliant ASUSTeK run and published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Comparison of compliant 2P AMD EPYC 9374F (954 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 64 Total Cores, compliant run ASUSTeK
RS700A-E12, 1536 GB - 24x 64 GB 2Rx4 PC5-4800B-R, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4, AOCC 4.0) is 1.96x the performance of published 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8362 (486 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 64 Total Cores,
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q3/cpu2017-20220729-32239.html). Published 2P AMD EPYC 75F3 (546 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 560 Total TDP W, 64 Total Cores, $9720 Total CPU $, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-2021040925543.html) is shown at 1.12x for reference. SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information
SP5-027A: SPECrate®2017_fp_base comparison is based on a compliant ASUSTeK run and published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Comparison of compliant 2P AMD EPYC 9374F (579 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 32 Total Cores, compliant run ASUSTeK
RS700A-E12, 1536 GB - 24x 64 GB 2Rx4 PC5-4800B-R, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4, AOCC 4.0) is 1.78x the performance of published 2P Intel Xeon Gold 6346 (325 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 410 Total TDP W, 32 Total Cores, $5416 Total CPU $,http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q3/cpu2017-20210802-28471.html). Published 2P AMD EPYC 73F3 (398 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 480 Total TDP W, 32 Total Cores, $7042 Total CPU $, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q3/cpu2017-2021081628714.html) shown at 1.22x for reference. SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.
SP5-028A: SPECrate®2017_fp_base comparison based on a compliant ASUSTeK run and published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Comparison of compliant 2P AMD EPYC 9554 (1200 SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 800 Total TDP W, 128 Total Cores, $18174
Total CPU $, compliant run ASUSTeK RS700A-E12, 1536 GB - 24x 64 GB 2Rx4 PC5-4800B-R, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4, AOCC 4.0) is 2.04x the performance (28% per core adjusted) of published 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (587 SPECrate®2017_fp_base,
540 Total TDP W, 80 Total Cores, $18718 Total CPU $, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221010-32542.html). SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See
www.spec.org for more information.
SP5-029A: SPECrate®2017_int_base comparison based on a compliant ASUSTeK run and published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Comparison of compliant 2P AMD EPYC 9554 (1300 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 800 Total TDP W, 128 Total Cores,$18174 Total CPU $, compliant run ASUSTeK RS700A-E12, 1536 GB - 24x 64 GB 2Rx4 PC5-4800B-R, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4, AOCC 4.0) is 2.16x the performance (35% per core adjusted) of published 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (602SPECrate®2017_int_base, 540 Total TDP W, 80 Total Cores, $18718 Total CPU $, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-20210521-26364.html). SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation
Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.
SP5-031: Black-Scholes European Option Pricing benchmark comparison based on AMD measurements for 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1600M options as of 10/4/2022. Max score is based on 200M options. Configurations: 2x 40-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 vs. 2x 64core EPYC 9554 all systems on Ubuntu 22.04 and compiled with ICC 2022.1.0. Results may vary.2x 32-core EPYC 75F3 (shown for reference) at ~1.1x.

30

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

ENDNOTES
SP5-032: WRF® CONUS 2.5KM workload benchmark comparison based on AMD measurements as of 10/4/2022. Configurations: 2x 40-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 vs. vs. 2x 96-core EPYC 9654 for ~2.5x the time-step function performance. Results may vary.
SP5-033: WRF® CONUS 2.5KM workload benchmark comparison based on AMD measurements as of 10/4/2022. Configurations: 2x 32-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8362 vs. vs. 2x 32-core EPYC 9374F for ~1.98x the time-step function performance. Results may vary.
SP5-034A: Fluent® Release 2022 R2 test cases benchmark comparison based on AMD measurements as of 10/19/2022. Configurations: 2x 40-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 vs. vs. 2x 96-core EPYC 9654 for ~2.46x the rating performance. Results may vary.
SP5-035A: Fluent® Release 2022 R2 test cases benchmark comparison based on AMD measurements as of 10/19/2022. Configurations: 2x 32-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8362 vs. vs. 2x 32-core EPYC 9374F for ~1.75x the rating performance. Results may vary.

SP5-036: Radioss™ neon workload benchmark comparison based on AMD measurements as of 10/4/2022. Configurations: 2x 40-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 vs. vs. 2x 96-core EPYC 9654 for ~2.59x the solver speedup performance. Results may vary.
SP5-037: Radioss™ neon workload benchmark comparison based on AMD measurements as of 10/4/2022. Configurations: 2x 32-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8362 vs. vs. 2x 32-core EPYC 9374F for ~1.73x the solver speedup performance. Results may vary.
SP5-039: Autodesk® Arnold gtc_robot workload comparison based on internal AMD reference platform measurements as of 11/10/2022. Comparison of 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (99 avg. seconds/872.73 ray-traces/day) is ~2.4x the performance of 2P Intel Xeon Platinum
8380 (235 avg seconds/367.66 ray-traces/day). Results may vary.2P EPYC 7763 shown for reference (167 avg seconds/517.37 ray-traces/day) at ~1.4x.
SP5-049B: VMmark® 3.1.1 matched pair comparison based on published results as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2-node, 2P 96-core EPYC 9654 powered server running VMware ESXi 8 RTM (40.19 @ 44 tiles/836 VMs,
https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2022-10-18-HPE-ProLiant-DL385Gen11.pdf) versus 2-node, 2P 40-core Xeon Platinum 8380 running VMware ESXi v7 U2 (14.19 @ 14 tiles/266 VMs,
https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2021-04-20-Fujitsu-PRIMERGY-RX2540M6.pdf) for 2.8x the score and 3.1x the tile (VM) capacity. 2-node, 2P EPYC 7763-powered server (23.33 @ 24 tiles/456 VMs,
https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2022-02-08-Fujitsu-RX2450M1.pdf) shown at 1.6x the performance for reference. VMmark is a registered trademark of VMware in the US or other countries.
SP5-065: SPECrate®2017_int_energy_base comparison based on published results as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (1890 SPECrate®2017_int_energy_base/1190 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 192 total cores,
www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221024-32633.html) vs. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (725 SPECrate®2017_int_energy_base/531 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 80 total cores, www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-2021041225603.html). 2P AMD EPYC 7713 (1610 SPECrate®2017_int_energy_base/576 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 128 total cores, www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q1/cpu2017-20210301-25148.html) shown at 2.22x for reference. NOTE: Red text only needs to be included
with charts that show the 7763.
SP5-067: SPECjbb® 2015-MultiJVM Max based on published scores from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2P AMD EPYC 9374F (359294 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM max-jOPS, 167272 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM critical-jOPS, 64 total cores,
http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2022q4/jbb2015-20221005-00856.html) is 1.71x the performance of published 2P Intel Xeon Gold 6338 (210635 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM max-jOPS, 111971 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM critical-jOPS, 64 total cores,
http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2022q1/jbb2015-20220209-00717.html). 2P AMD EPYC 75F3 (276317 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM max-jOPS, 116628 SPECjbb®2015 MultiJVM critical-jOPS, 64 total cores,
http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2021q2/jbb2015-20210408-00637.html) shown at 1.310x for reference. SPEC® and SPECjbb® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information. NOTE:
Red text only needs to be included with charts that show the 75F3.
SP5-068: SPECrate®2017_int_base, SPECrate®2017_fp_base, and BERT-large estimates based on internal AMD reference platform measurements of 11/3/2022. Floating-point throughput comparison: 2P AMD EPYC 9534 (1030 est. SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 560 Total
TDP W, 128 Total Cores) is 1.66x the performance/W of 2P AMD EPYC 7763 (622 est. SPECrate®2017_fp_base, 560 Total TDP W, 128 Total Cores). Integer throughput comparison: 2P AMD EPYC 9534 (1070 est. SPECrate®2017_int_base, 560 Total TDP W, 128 Total
Cores) is 1.34x the performance/W of published 2P AMD EPYC 7763 (800 est. SPECrate®2017_int_base, 560 Total TDP W, 128 Total Cores). Bert-Large NLP sparse INT8 comparison: 2P AMD EPYC 9534 (345.6 items/sec, 560 Total TDP W, 128 Total Cores) is 2.67x theperformance/W of published 2P AMD EPYC 7763 (129.7 items/sec, 560 Total TDP W, 128 Total Cores). SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information. OEM
published scores will vary based on system configuration and determinism mode used (default cTDP performance profile).

31

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

ENDNOTES
SP5-069: SPECrate®2017_int_base estimate based on internal AMD reference platform measurements and published score from www.spec.org as of 11/10/2022. Comparison of estimated 1P AMD EPYC 9554P (631 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 400 Total TDP W, 64 Total
Cores, $7104 Total CPU $, AMD Est) is 1.05x the performance of published 2P Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (602 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 540 Total TDP W, 80 Total Cores, $18718 Total CPU $, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-20210521-26364.html)[at 1.42x the performance/W] [at 2.76x the performance/CPU$]. AMD 1Ku pricing and Intel ARK.intel.com specifications and pricing as of 8/22/22. SPEC®, SPEC CPU®, and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See
www.spec.org for more information. OEM published scores will vary based on system configuration and determinism mode used (default cTDP performance profile)SP5-070: MySQL® 8.0.17 DSS comparison based on AMD measured median scores on 2P 96-core EPYC 9654 compared to 2P 40-core Xeon Platinum 8380 running virtualized HammerDB TPROC-H SF1 (KVM Hypervisor Virtualization server environment with 4 streams, 4virtual units, calculating throughput with 4 streams x 22 queries x 3600 divided by the slowest VU completion time in seconds) as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2x AMD EPYC 9654 (~126,980 TPROC-H tpm) vs. 2x Xeon Platinum 8380 (~47452 TPROC-H queries/hour)for ~2.68x the tpm performance.
SP5-071: MySQL® 8.0.17 OLTP comparison based on AMD measured median scores on 2P 96-core EPYC 9654 compared to 2P 40-core Xeon Platinum 8380 running virtualized HammerDB TPROC-C (KVM Hypervisor Virtualization server environment with 400 WH and 64
users) as of 11/10/2022. Configurations: 2x AMD EPYC 9654 (~126,980 TPROC-C tpm/~531,183 NOPM) vs. 2x Xeon Platinum 8380 (~47452 TPROC-C tpm/~224,126 NOPM) for ~2.37x the tpm/NOPM performance.
SP5TCO-009K: As of 11/10/2022 based on AMD Internal analysis using the AMD EPYC™ Bare Metal Server & Greenhouse Gas Emission TCO Estimation Tool - version 6.35 estimating the cost and quantity of 2P AMD EPYC™ 9654 powered servers versus 2P Intel® Xeon®
8380 based server solutions required to deliver 8500 units of integer performance. Environmental impact estimates made leveraging this data, using the Country / Region specific electricity factors from the '2020 Grid Electricity Emissions Factors v1.4 – September
2020', and the United States Environmental Protection Agency 'Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator’. This scenario contains many assumptions and estimates and, while based on AMD internal research and best approximations, should be considered an
example for information purposes only, and not used as a basis for decision making over actual testing. The analysis includes both hardware and virtualization software components. For additional details, see https://www.amd.com/en/claims/epyc3x#faq-SP5TCO009K.
SP5TCO-010K: This scenario contains many assumptions and estimates and, while based on AMD internal research and best approximations, should be considered an example for information purposes only, and not used as a basis for decision making over actual
testing. The Bare Metal Server Greenhouse Gas Emissions TCO (total cost of ownership) Estimator Tool compares the selected AMD EPYC™ and Intel® Xeon® CPU based server solutions required to deliver a TOTAL_PERFORMANCE of 8,500 units of integer performancebased on the estimated or published scores for Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC CPU based servers. This estimation reflects a 1-year time frame. This analysis compares a 1P AMD EPYC 64 core 9554P CPU powered server with an estimated SPECrate®2017_int_base score of631, performance estimated using AMD reference platform; compared to a 2P Intel Xeon 40 core Platinum_8380 based server with a SPECrate®2017_int_base score of 602 https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-20210521-26364.pdf.
SP5TCO-011k: This scenario contains many assumptions and estimates and, while based on AMD internal research and best approximations, should be considered an example for information purposes only, and not used as a basis for decision making over actual
testing. The Bare Metal Server Greenhouse Gas Emissions TCO (total cost of ownership) Estimator Tool compares the selected AMD EPYC™ and Intel® Xeon® CPU based server solutions required to deliver a TOTAL_PERFORMANCE of 8,500 units of integer performancebased on the estimated or published scores for Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC CPU based servers. This estimation reflects a 1-year time frame. This analysis compares a 1P AMD EPYC 96 core 9654P CPU powered server with an estimated SPECrate®2017_int_base score of895, performance estimated using AMD reference platform; compared to a 2P Intel Xeon 40 core Platinum_8380 based server with a SPECrate®2017_int_base score of 602 https://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2021q2/cpu2017-20210521-26364.pdf.
SP5TCO-012K: As of 10/10/2022 based on AMD Internal analysis using the AMD EPYC™ SERVER VIRTUALIZATION and GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS TCO ESTIMATION TOOL - version 10.75 estimating the cost and quantity of 2P AMD EPYC™ 9654 (96 core/CPU)
powered server versus 2P Intel® Xeon® 8380 (40 core/CPU) based server solutions required to deliver 200 total virtual machines (VM), requiring 8 core and 16GB of memory per VM, for the 1st year. Environmental impact estimates made leveraging this data, using
the Country / Region specific electricity factors from the '2020 Grid Electricity Emissions Factors v1.4 – September 2020', and the United States Environmental Protection Agency 'Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator’. This scenario contains many assumptions
and estimates and, while based on AMD internal research and best approximations, should be considered an example for information purposes only, and not used as a basis for decision making over actual testing. For additional details, see
https://www.amd.com/en/claims/epyc4#-SP5TCO-012K.
SP5TCO-019K: As of 11/10/2022 based on AMD Internal analysis using the AMD EPYC™ SERVER VIRTUALIZATION and GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS TCO ESTIMATION TOOL - version 10.75 estimating the cost and quantity of 2P AMD EPYC™ 9654 (96 core/CPU)
powered server versus 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold 8380 (40 core/CPU) based server solutions required to deliver 1995 total virtual machines (VM) based on VMmark tiles in published results, for 1st year. Environmental impact estimates made leveraging this data, using theCountry / Region specific electricity factors from the '2020 Grid Electricity Emissions Factors v1.4 – September 2020', and the United States Environmental Protection Agency 'Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator’. This scenario contains many assumptions andestimates and, while based on AMD internal research and best approximations, should be considered an example for information purposes only, and not used as a basis for decision making over actual testing.For additional details, see
https://www.amd.com/en/claims/epyc4#SP5TCO-019K.

32

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)

DISCLAIMER AND ATTRIBUTION
The information contained herein is for informational purposes only and is subject to change without notice. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this document, it may containtechnical inaccuracies, omissions and typographical errors, and AMD is under no obligation to update or otherwise correct this information. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. makes no representations or
warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document, and assumes no liability of any kind, including the implied warranties of noninfringement, merchantability or
fitness for particular purposes, with respect to the operation or use of AMD hardware, software or other products described herein. No license, including implied or arising by estoppel, to any
intellectual property rights is granted by this document. Terms and limitations applicable to the purchase or use of AMD’s products are as set forth in a signed agreement between the parties or in
AMD's Standard Terms and Conditions of Sale.
Timelines, roadmaps, and/or product release dates shown in these slides are plans only and subject to change. “Rome”, “Milan”, "Genoa", “Zen”, “Zen2”, “Zen3”, and "Zen4" are codenames for AMD
architectures, and are not product names.

©2022 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All rights reserved. AMD, the AMD Arrow logo, EPYC, Infinity Fabric, and combinations thereof are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Other productnames used in this publication are for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective companies. Microsoft SQL Server is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the US or otherjurisdictions, PCIe - PCIe is a registered trademark of PCI-SIG Corporation, Oracle is a registered mark of Oracle and/or its affiliates, Radioss is a trademark of Altair Engineering, Inc. SPEC®, SPECrate®, andSPECpower® are registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Learn more at spec.org. More information about SPEC® is available at http://www.spec.org. VMmark is a
registered trademark of VMware in the US or other countries.

33

第22回PCクラスタシンポジウム (2022/12/05)