The 3nd Public and Private Joint Forumin Asian region- The 17th JASIC ASIA GOVERNMENT/ INDUSTRY MEETING -Dec. 4 - 6, 2012
Crowne Plaza
Manila, Philippines

Organized by
Department of Transportation and Communications(DOTC),
Land Transportation Office (LTO), Republic of
Philippines
andMinistry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport andTourism (MLIT), Japan
Operated by

Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization

Center (JASIC)

Meeting Schedule &Participants List

The 3rd Public and Private Joint Forumin Asian Region- The 17th JASIC ASIA GOVERNMENT/ INDUSTRY MEETING Date: Dec. 4 - 6, 2012
Place: Crowne Plaza Manila Galleria
Address: Ortigas Avenue corner Asian Development Bank Avenue,
Quezon City, Philippines, 1100
Phone: (632) 633-7222
Fax:(632) 633-2821

Web site: www.crowneplaza.com

Organized by
Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC),Land Transportation Office (LTO), Republic of Philippines
andMinistry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Japan

Operated by
Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center (JASIC)

The 3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region- Promoting the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) concept
under the UN Regulation framework for realizing harmonization of regulations
and establishing Mutual Recognition of Approvals (MRA) in the Asian region Date: Dec. 4 (Tue.) 2012, 9:00-17:20
Place: BALL ROOM - A, 4F Crowne Plaza
Co-chaired by: Ms.Virginia P. Torres
Mr. Takeshi Ishikawa

Assistant Secretary, Land Transportation Office, Philippines
Chairman, International Cooperation Committee, JASIC

08:30 - 09:00

Registration of the Participants

09:00 - 09:08

Welcome Speech
Undersecretary for Road

09:08 - 09:15
09:15 - 09:23

DOTC, Philippines

Welcome Address from Industry
Mr. Vicente T. Mills, JR, President, Philippine Automotive Federation Incorporated (PAFI)
Opening Remark 1
Mr. Takao Onoda

Director, International Affairs Office, Engineering Policy Division,
Road Transport Bureau, MLIT, Japan

09:23 - 09:30

Opening Remark 2
Mr. Yoshihiro Nanto Director General, JASIC

09:30 - 09:37

Opening Remark 3
Mr. Takashi Hirai Director, Preparatory Office for Establishment of Jakarta Office, JASIC

09:37 - 09:50
09:50 - 10:10

Photography
Coffee Break

10:10 - 10:30

Keynote Speech-1
Mr. Takao Onoda

10:30 - 10:45
10:45 - 11:00
11:00 - 11:30

Director, MLIT, Japan

Keynote Speech-2
Honorable Joseph Emilio Abaya
Keynote Speech-3
Ir. Mohamad Bin Dalib

Secretary, DOTC, Philippines

Chairman of ACCSQ-APWG Task Force

Report-1: Report from Industries
The report of the RACE meeting; Representative of JAMA and CAMPI or MDPPA
The report of the Parts industry Activity; JAPIA

11:30 - 13:00

Lunch

Place: TBD

13:00 - 13:30

Debriefing session and discussion for WP29
Mr. Ushio Ueno
Executive Director, JASIC
13:30 - 14:30 Discussion for the future Forum based on 6th series
Coordinator: Mr. Takaki Kasai
Co-Chairman, International Cooperation Committee, JASIC

14:30 - 14:50
14:50 - 15:20

Coffee Break
Debriefing session and discussion for the 1958 Agreement and IWVTA
Mr. Johan Renders European Union
Mr. Takao Onoda
Director, MLIT, Japan

15:20 - 16:50
Panel Discussion Ⅰ :Requests to the 1958 Agreement and IWVTA from Asian economies and its reflection result,and the future request including the UN Regulation and GTR
Coordinator: Mr. Michio Miyamoto
Chairman of WP29/IWVTA Committee, JASIC
Panelists: Japan, Malaysia, Thailand, India, Indonesia, Philippines
18:30
19:30

Departure time of the bus from Crowne Plaza
Welcome Reception to be hosted by DOTC, LTO
Place: VIKINGS RESTAURANT, SM Mall of Asia, Pasay City

The 3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region- Promoting the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) concept
under the UN Regulation framework for realizing harmonization of regulations
and establishing Mutual Recognition of Approvals (MRA) in the Asian region Date: Dec. 5 (Wed.) 2012, 9:00-16:30
Place: BALL ROOM - A, 4F Crowne Plaza
Co-chaired by: Mr. Takao Onoda
Director, International Affairs Office, Engineering Policy Division,
Road Transport Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Japan
Atty. Jaime Rafael Feliciano
Assistant Secretary for Planning and ICS
Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC), Philippines
09:00 - 10:15

Country Report:
Short presentation and speech on the development of the vehicle type approvalsystems in each ASEAN country, Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong, and Korea

10:15 - 10:30

Coffee Break

10:30 – 12:00
Panel Discussion Ⅱ :ASEAN 19 items and the examination of the optimally unified vehicle type approval system in
ASEAN region
Coordinator: Mr. Shigeo Yoshizawa Chairman of ASEAN Subcommittee, JASIC
Panelists: Japan, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines, Singapore
12:00 - 13:30

Lunch

13:30 - 13:45

Report-2: JICA Philippine Project
Mr. Arnel R. Manresa Chief of Road Transport Planning Division, DOTC

13:45 - 14:15

Report-3: China and India Forum in 2012, and their Country Report:- China forum and Country Report: China- India forum and Country Report:
India

14:15 - 14:30

Report-4: Expert Meetings in 2012 and plan for 2013
Mr. Hiroshi Morita Director, JASIC

14:30 - 15:00

Coffee Break

15:00 - 16:00

Drafting Wrap Up

16:00 - 16:20

Adoption of Wrap Up

16:20 - 16:30

Closing Address
Atty. Alfonso V. Tan, Jr.

17:00 - 19:00

Place: TBD

Executive Director, LTO, Philippines

Farewell Reception hosted by JAPAN
Place: Sapphire B RoomThe 3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region- Technical Tour Date: December 6 (Thu) 2012
Place: TOYOTA MOTOR PHILIPPINES CORPORATION
Toyota Special Economic Zone
Santa Rosa-Tagaytay Highway, Santa Rosa City, Laguna
Tel.: Manila Trunk Line (+2) 825-8888
Laguna Trunk Line (+49) 541-3020
Fax: (+2) 6800-5086
Web URL: www.toyota.com.phSchedule:
6:30 - 7:00
7:00 - 7:15

Assembly at Lobby of Crowne Plaza Galleria Hotel
Depart for Toyota Motor Phil. Corp., Sta. Rosa Laguna(Depend on traffic)

In the facility
From
8:15
9:00
9:30
10:30
10:35
11:45
11:55

12:00 - 12:45
12:45 - 14:00
14:00 - 16:00

To
9:00
9:30
10:30
10:35
11:00
11:55
12:00

Activity
Ingress Registration
Corporate Orientation
Plant Tour
Return to Assigned Room
Question and Answer Portion
Photo Opportunity
Departure

Travel time to Taal Vista Hotel
Lunch at Taal Vista Hotel
Travel time back to Crowne Plaza Galleria Hotel

Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center
3F, Shoei-Rokubancho Bldg., 6, Rokubancho,

Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0085, JAPAN
Tel:+81-3-5216-7241, Fax:+81-3-5216-7244

LIST OF FOREIGN PARTICIPANTS IN THE 17TH JASIC ASIA GOVERNMENT/INDUSTRY MEETINGNo.

Country/
EconomyName(First Name to Last
Name

Organization/
Company

Title/Position

Mailing Address

E‐mail Address

Phone

Fax

Mr. Hung Chu Nien

Vehicle Safety
Certification Center(VSCC)+886‐4‐7812180
Ext. 2120+886‐4‐7811400

Mr. Simon Hsu

simon@vscc.org.tw+886‐4‐7812180+886‐4‐7811555

3

Mr. Yu‐Jen Hung

Vehicle Safety
Certification Center
TTVMA/Kuozui
Motors. Ltd.

No. 2 Lugong N.2nd Rd.,
Lugong Town, Changhua
Country 50544, Taiwan,(R.O.C.)No. 2 Lugong N. 2nd Rd.,
Lukang Town, Changhua
No. 73 Ding‐Ning Rd., Chung‐Li, Tao‐Yuan, Taiwan

nhc@vscc.org.tw

2

Engineer & Domestic
Vehicle Certification
Dept. Certification
Specialist
Director

11421hung@mail.kuozui.com.tw+886‐3‐4611222#451+886‐3‐4520304

erichsu@ttvma.org.tw

886‐2‐
2705110#123

Hsin‐pin.yu@yulon‐nissan.com.tw

886‐37‐875881#1896
886‐3‐
47831 ext.
2685
+32‐2‐
2969962886‐3‐
270774

1

THE REPUBLIC
OF CHINA(R.O.C)
Taiwan4

TTVMA (Taiwan
Transp. Vehicle.
Manufacturers
Association)
Yulon Nissan MotorCo., Ltd.

Executive Senior
Specialist

9th Floor, 380 Sec. 1, Fu‐Shing
South Road Taipei (106)
Taiwan ROC

Engineer/ Regulation &Certification GroupMr. Chung‐Guan
Cheng

China Motor Corp.

Specialist, ProductEngineering Division
Legislative Officer –Automotive Industry
Unit
Executive Director(TECH)

39‐2, Bogongkeng, Xihu
Village, Sanyi Township,
Miaoli County 367 Taiwan(ROC)
No. 618, Xiucai Rd., Yangmei
City, Taoyuan County 326,
Taiwan (ROC)
European Commission Office:
BREY 10/038, B‐1049 Brussels

Mr. Sheng‐Lung Hsu

5

Mr. Hsin‐Pin Yu

6Group Manager

7

EUROPERAN
UNION

Mr. Johan Renders

European Commission

8

INDIA

Mr. K K Gandhi

Society of Indian
Automobile
Manufacturers

9

INDONESIA

Mr. Dea Fabriani
SusantoGaikindo/Pt. Astra
Daihatsu Motor

10

Mr.Abdur Rahim

11

ccg@china‐motor.com

Johan.renders@ec.europa.eu

886‐2‐
27066440886‐37‐874042

Core‐413, 5thF India Habitat
Centre, LODI Road, New
Delhikkgandhi@siam.in

91‐11‐
47103010/
18

91‐11‐
2464822
2

Supervisor

Jl. Gaya Motor III/5, Sunter II,
Jakarta Utara

dea.fabriani@daihatsu.astra.co.id+6221‐
651835

Gaikindo/Pt. Ford
Motor Indonesia

Manager Government
AffairWisma Pondok Indah 2, Suite
1601‐02, Jakarta Selatanarahim2@ford.com+6221‐
6510400
Ext.5332+6221‐
27588323

Mr. Sutan Sinar
Situmorang

Ministry of Industry

JL, Gatot Subroto Kau 52‐53
11th Floor Jakarta

622152519
01

6221525
1901

Mr. Yan Sibarang
Tandiele

Ministry of Industry

Head of Section for
Component Industry inStandards
Deputy Director for
Component Industry

JL, Gatot Subroto Kau 52‐53
11th Floor Jakarta

Yantandiele2003@yahoo.com

13

Mr. Emjunan Sihite

Gaikindo/Pt. TMMIN

Jl. Laks. Yos Sudarso Sunter II,
Jakarta Utara

emsih@toyota.co.id
sihiteemjunan@yahoo.com

6221525
1901+6221‐
652161014Mr.Mahardian Ismadi
Brata

Gaikindo/Pt. Suzuki
Indomobil Motor

Head of Government &Regulatory Affair
SectionSeniorForeman/Homologation Group Leader

Jl. Pangeran Diponegoro Km
36,2. Tambun Bekasi

mahardian.brata@suzuki.co.id
brata.mahardian@gmail.com

622152519
01+6221‐
6515551
Ext. 2606+6221‐
8801235
Ext. 598121sutanss@yahoo.com+6221‐
75922975+6221‐
8834350
8

LIST OF FOREIGN PARTICIPANTS IN THE 17TH JASIC ASIA GOVERNMENT/INDUSTRY MEETING

15

Mr.Tri Wahono

16

Mr. Arif Setiawan

17

18
19

Gaikindo/Pt. Nissan
Motor Indonesia
Gaikindo/Pt. KTBAssistant Manager,
Gov. Relation Dev.
Head of Regulation
Section

Jln.MT Haryono Kav 10,
Jakarta 13330
Jl. Jend A. Yani Proyek Pulo
Mas, Jakarta 13210

tri.wb@nissan.co.id

Mr. Eddy Surowasono

Gaikindo/Pt. Toyota
Astra Motor

Head of Regulation andCertificate Section

Jl. Yos Sudarso, Sunte 2,
Jakarta Utara

eddy.surowasono@toyota.astra.co.id

Mr.Hidayatul Ichsan
SuwarnoMr. Muawiyah Ismail

Gaikindo

Section Headichsan@gaikindo.or.id
hidayatulichsan2@gmail.com

Gaikindo/Pt. TMMIN

Head of Government
and Regulatory Affair
Section
Deputy director ofRoadworthiness

Jl. Teuku Cik Ditiro I No. 11 D‐
E‐F, Menteng, Jakarta Pusat
Jl. Laks Yos Sudarso Sunter II,
Jakarta Utara
Karya Bldg., 8thF, Medan
Merdeka Barat No. 8, Jakarta
10110

totonoer@hotmail.com

Chief of Legal Aids andDocumentation

Karya Bldg., 9th F, Medan
Merdeka Barat No. 8, Jakarta
10110

farizka@yahoo.com

Chairman of WP
29/IWVTA Committee

3F Shoei‐Rokubancho Bldg., 6
Rokubancho, Chiyoda‐ku
Tokyo 102‐0085

20

Mr. Toto
NurwitJaksono

21

Ms. Farida
Makhmudah

22

JAPAN

Mr. Michio Miyamoto

Directorate Gen. ofLand Transportation,
Min. ofTransportation,
Republic of Indonesia
Directorate Gen. ofLand Transportation,
Min. ofTransportation,
Republic of Indonesia
Japan Automobile
Standards
Internationalization
Center (JASIC)

Mr. Takaki Kasai

JASIC

Chairman ofInternational Operation
Committee
Co‐Chairman ofInternational Operation
Committee

Mr. Shigeo Yoshizawa

JASIC

Chairman of ASEAN
Subcommittee

23
Mr. Takeshi Ishikawa

JASIC/Honda Motor
Co. Ltd.

24

25

26
Mr. Kiminori Hyodo

JASIC

Chairman of Regulation
and Certification
Systems Committee,
JAPIA

27
Mr. Yoshihiro Nanto

JASIC

Director General52‐1 Hagadai, Haga‐Machi,
Haga‐gun, Tochigi 321‐3325

3F Shoei‐Rokubancho Bldg., 6
Rokubancho, Chiyoda‐ku
Tokyo 102‐0085

arief‐s@ktb.co.id

oshi@toyota.co.id+6221‐
8582323+6221‐
4891608
Ext.1862+6221‐
6515551+6221‐
8584927+6221‐
4751351+6221‐
651531+6221‐
3157178+6221‐
6515551
Ext. 2606+62‐21‐3506127+62‐21‐3506127+62‐21‐3506141+62‐21‐3506141+81‐3‐
5216‐7241+81‐3‐
5216‐
7244+81 28687‐2150+81 28687‐2144+81‐3‐
5216‐7241+81‐3‐
5216‐
7244+81‐3‐
5216‐7241+81‐3‐
5216‐
7244+81‐3‐
5216‐7241+81‐3‐
5216‐
7244+81‐3‐
5216‐7241+81‐3‐
5216‐
7244

michio@miyamoto.tec.toyota+6221‐
3142100+6221‐
6521610takeshi_ishikawa@hm.honda.co.jp
3F Shoei‐Rokubancho Bldg., 6
Rokubancho, Chiyoda‐ku
Tokyo 102‐0085

3F Shoei‐Rokubancho Bldg., 6
Rokubancho, Chiyoda‐ku
Tokyo 102‐0085

3F Shoei‐Rokubancho Bldg., 6
Rokubancho, Chiyoda‐ku
Tokyo 102‐0085
2tac001@cava.tec.toyota.co.jp

shigeo_a_yoshizawa@hm.honda.co.jp

kimi‐hyodo@koito.co.jp

nanto@jasic.org

LIST OF FOREIGN PARTICIPANTS IN THE 17TH JASIC ASIA GOVERNMENT/INDUSTRY MEETING

28
Mr. Ushio Ueno

JASIC

Executive Director

3F Shoei‐Rokubancho Bldg., 6
Rokubancho, Chiyoda‐ku
Tokyo 102‐0085

Head of Jakarta Office

3F Shoei‐Rokubancho Bldg., 6
Rokubancho, Chiyoda‐ku
Tokyo 102‐0085

29
Mr. Takashi Hirai

JASIC

30
Mr. Hiroshi Morita
JASIC

DirectorMr. Yoshiaki Nanbu

JASIC

Chief

Mr. Takao Onoda

Ministry of Land,
infrastructure,
Transport andTourism (MILT)

Director ofInternational Affairs
Office, Engineering
Policy Division, Road
Transport Bureau

Ministry of Land,
infrastructure,
Transport andTourism (MILT)

Chief of International
Affairs Office,Engineering Policy
Division, Road
Transport Bureau

2‐1‐3 Kasumigaseki,
Chiyodaku Tokyo 100‐8918

JASIC/Ford Motor
Corp.

Advance Veh.
Regulation Manager,
APA SE & SE
Type Approval Engr.

3‐L shinchi, Fuchu‐cho,
Hiroshima 730‐8670

31

32

33

34

3F Shoei‐Rokubancho Bldg., 6
Rokubancho, Chiyoda‐ku
Tokyo 102‐0085

Mr. Takashi Ootomo

Mr. Kenji Maruyama

3F Shoei‐Rokubancho Bldg., 6
Rokubancho, Chiyoda‐ku
Tokyo 102‐0085
2‐1‐3
Kasumigaseki,
Chiyodaku
Tokyo 100‐
8918

35

Mr. Kasuzhi Arima

Vehicle Certification
Agency36

Mr. Akira Togashi

JAPIA (Japan
Autoparts Industries
Association)

Sr. Manager Technical
Dept.

JAPIA

Chairman of Regulation
and Certification
System Committee

Koito Mfg. Co. LTD. 500
Kitawaki, Shimizu‐ku,
Shizuoka‐shi, 424‐8764,
Japan

Transport
Attache,Economic
Section, Embassyof Japan in thePhilippines

Embassy of Japan, 2627
Roxas blvd., Pasay city, Metro
Manila, 1300 Philippines,
P.O. Box 414 Pasay City

37

38

Mr. Kiminori Hyodo

Mr. Masayuki HARIGAI

Ministry ofForeign Affairs(MOFA), Japan

3F Kanayama Yamato Bldg.,
6‐9, 1 Chome, Shin‐Otou,
Atsuta, Nagoya, Japan
1‐16‐15 Takanawa, Minato‐
ku Tokyo, 108‐0074 Japan3

ueno@jasic.org+81‐3‐
5216‐7241+81‐3‐
5216‐
7244+81‐3‐
5216‐7241+81‐3‐
5216‐
7244+81‐3‐
5216‐7241+81‐3‐
5216‐
7244+81‐3‐
5216‐7241+81‐3‐
5216‐
7244

hirai@jasic.org

morita@jasic.org

nanbu@jasic.org

onoda-t2r3@mlit.go.jp+81‐3‐5253‐ +81‐3‐
8592
5253‐1639

ootomo-t23k@mlit.go.jp+81‐3‐
5253‐8592+81‐3‐
5253‐
8592

kmaruyama@ford.com

81‐82‐287‐
497

81‐81‐
287‐5147

kasuzhi@vca‐asia.jp+81‐52‐683‐8831+81‐52‐683‐8832

tohashi@japia.or.jp+81 3 3445
4215

+81 3
3447
5372

Kimi‐hyodo@koitto.co.jp+81 3 3445
2366

+81 3
3445
3437

(632)551‐
5710 ext.
2104(632)551‐5783

masayuki.harigai@mofa.go.jp

LIST OF FOREIGN PARTICIPANTS IN THE 17TH JASIC ASIA GOVERNMENT/INDUSTRY MEETING39

Mr. Kenichiro,
KOREEDA

Ministry ofForeign Affairs(MOFA), Japan

Trade and Commercial
Attache, Economic
Section, Embassy ofJapan in the Philippines

Embassy of Japan, 2627
Roxas blvd., Pasay city, Metro
Manila, 1300 Philippines,
P.O. Box 414 Pasay City

kenichiro.koreeda@mofa.go.jp(632)551‐
5710 ext.
2104(632)551‐5783

856‐21‐453494856‐21‐453193040

LAO PDR

Mr. Thongdam
Khounoudom

Dept. of Industry andHandicraft

Director, ProductsStandard Div.

Phonexay Rd., P.O. Box 4107,
Vientiane Capitalthongdamk@hotmail.com

41

MALAYSIA

Ms. Iris Pereira

Honda Malaysia Son
BHD

Senior Executive

iris@honda.net.my+60655915
79+606559
1598

42

Mr. Kamis Zuraini

Perodua Mfg. SDN
BHDManager

HICOM Industrial Park, Pegon
78000 Alor Gajah, Melaka,
Malaysia
Perodua Mfg. SDN BHD,
Sungai Choh, Locked Bag 226,
48009 Rawang, Selangor,
Malaysia

zuraini@perodua.com.my

603‐
6738888
ext 3678

60367330541

43

Ms. Binsi Mohd Zin
Zuraini

PROTON SDN BHD

Managerzuraininz@proton. com+60350392
318+603519
19548

44

Sharulnizam@jpj.gov.myDirector

Mohamad@jpj.gov.my+60194475
429+60388866
420+60388905950+60388905950

46

Mr. Goh Wei Ping

Road Transport Dept.
of Malaysia
Road Transport Dept.
of Malaysia
Hong Leong Yamaha
Motor

Deputy Director

45

Mohd Sharul Nizam
Sarip
Mohamad Dalib

60‐16‐
359869660‐3‐6157717

Ministry of Transport
Malaysia

Assistant Secretary+60193773
600+603888
92461

Putra_ezree@bswhonda.com.my+60124990
433+604334
23725

tajudin@bswhonda.com.my+60124991
464+604334
23725

khalilizul@armstrong.auto.com

04‐4388202

04‐
4388626

47

Mr. Mohd Hafizi
Mohd Arifin

48

49

50

51

MYANMAR52

PHILIPPINESSINGAPORE

Manager, R & D

Eng. Div., PROTON SDN BHD,
40918 Shah Alam, Selangor,
Malaysia

Lot 57, Persiaran BRP3,
47000 SG Buloh Selangor,
Malaysia
Ministry of Trasnport
Malaysia, Land Division, Level
3, Block D5, Complex D,Federal Admin. Centre,
62616 Putrajaya, Malaysia
449, Jalan Permatang Pauh,
Mak Mandin, 13400,
butterworth, Penang,
Malaysia
449, Jalan Permatang Pauh,
Mak Mandin, 13400,
butterworth, Penang,
Malaysia

wpgoh@yamaha‐motor.com.my

hafizi@mot.gov.my

Mr. Putra Ezree Bin
Izham

Boon Siew Honda Sdn.
Bhd.

Engineer Quality
Assurance Section

Mohd Tajudin Bin
Loman

Boon Siew Honda
Sdn. Bhd.

Manager
Administration Division

Mr. Khalili Zulrifli

MASAAM/FAMI

Secretary General

Armstrong Auto Parts, Tikam
Batu Ind. Est. SG. Petani

Mr. Soe Win

Ministry of RailTransportation

Chief Engineer, Road
Transport
Administration Dept.

No. 29 Nay Pyi Taw,
MyanmarRasean123@gmail.com

95‐67‐
40514595‐67‐
405145

Mr. Chit Chong
Michael Wong

Motor Traders
Association ofSingapore (MTA)

Committee Member,
MTA

17 Lorong 8 Toa Payoh #02‐
00 Singapore 319254

secretariat@mta.org.sg

65‐62587210

65‐6472‐4930

4

LIST OF FOREIGN PARTICIPANTS IN THE 17TH JASIC ASIA GOVERNMENT/INDUSTRY MEETING53

THAILAND

Mrs. Phulporn
Saengbangpla

Thai‐Nichi Institute ofTechnology

Mr. Sitti
Limpanawong‐saen

General Motors

55

Ms. Jiraporn
Kaewkraisorn

Dept. of Land
Transport

56

Mr. Shinya Azuma

JAMA/Asian Honda
Motor Co. Ltd.

54

57

58

59

60
61

62

VIETNAM

Vice President:
Chairman ACCSQ‐
APWG
Technical Regulatory
Manager
Chief of Vehicle
Regulations Branch,
Automotive Eng.
BureauManager/ Certificate &Product Regulation
Bloc
Managing Director of
TMAP‐EM

Ms. Nanami
Sakakibara

TAIA/TMAP‐EM

Ms. Ruth Wannaruetai

The Thai Automotive
Industry Association

Vice‐President

Mr. Prasert
Angkawinijwong

The Thai Automotive
Industry Association

Vice‐President

Mr. Banpoch
Tengwongwattana
Mr. Ky Hong Nuyen

The Thai Automotive
Industry Association
VAMA/Vina Star
Motors Corp.

Mr. Nguyen Dong
Phong

Vietnam Register1771/1 Pattanakarn Rd.
Suanluang, BKK 10250
Level 21, Tasa Tower I, 555
Phaholyothin Road,
Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900
1032 Phaholyothin Road,
Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900

14 Sarasin Bldg., Surasak Rd.,
Silom, Bangrak, Bangkok
10500 Thailand
99 Moo 5, Ban‐Ragad, Bang
Bo, Samutprakarn, 10560
Thailand2754/1 Soi Sukhumvit 66/1,
Sukhumvit Rd., Bangna
Bangkok 10260

phulporn@yahoo.com

sitti.limpanawongsaen@gm.com
Jiraporn.dlt@gmail.com

ashinya@honda.th.com

sakakibara@tec.tmap‐em.toyota‐
asia.com
ruth.w@honda.co.th661‐
8079063662‐
2141919+660‐
27914820+660‐
29370171
662 2718667

662 2718603+66‐84‐875‐5261+66‐2790‐
5120+66(0)27
905036(662) 341‐
7888 #
2056(662)
790‐9102

186/1 MU 1 Old Railway Rd.,
T. Samrongtai A. Phra
Pradaeng, Samut Prakarn
10130

pangkawi@toyota.co.th(662) 386‐
1846

(552)
386‐1887

Asst. Gen. Manager

243 Trung Son, Thee Duc,
HCMC, Vietnam

KYNH@VINASTARMOTORS.COM.VN+84‐8‐
38963201

Deputy Director‐
Vehicle Certification
Dept.

18 Pham Hung Road, Tu LiemDistrict, Hanoi, Vietnam

Phongnd@yr.org.vn+84437684
730 ext
632+84‐8‐
38963200+84437684730

5

The 3rd Public and Private Joint Forumin Asian Region- Day 1 -Opening remarks

Welcome Speech

Undersecretary for Road

DOTC, Philippines

Welcome Addressfrom Industry

Mr. Vicente T. Mills, JR,
President, Philippine Automotive Federation
Incorporated (PAFI)

Opening remark 1

Mr. Takao Onoda,
Director, International Affairs Office,Engineering Policy Division,
Road Transport Bureau, MLIT, Japan

Opening remark 2

Mr. Yoshihiro Nanto
Director General,
Japan Automobile Standards
Internationalization Center (JASIC)

Opening remark 3

Mr. Takashi Hirai
Director, Preparatory Officefor Establishment of Jakarta Office, JASICThe 3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian region
The 17th JASIC ASIA GOVERNMENT/ INDUSTRY MEETINGJASIC Jakarta Office…
December 4, 2012
T k hi HIRAITakashi
Director
Preparatory Office for Establishment of Jakarta OfficeContents ‐ 1
 What is JASIC ?
• JASIC’s Activities- Cooperation with ASIA

• Activities of JASIC Jakarta Office2

What is JASIC ? - Objective
JASIC was established to assist the MLITMLITJapan;
in promoting the international harmonizationof automobile technical regulations andcertification system
under the cooperation between public andprivate sectors
3

What is JASIC ? - Organization overview
Government
Secretariat

Committee

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism (MLIT)

Head Office/Tokyoy (1987)()

Organizations and Industries
Geneva Office (1988)

Light Motor Vehicle Inspection Organization

Washingtong
Office (1997)()

Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association,
Inc
Inc.

Jakarta Office (2013)

Japan Auto Parts Industries Association
Japan Automobile Importers AssociationJapan
p Automotive Service Equipmentq p
Association

Cooperating organizations

Automobile Inspection & Registration
Association

Ministry of Economy,
Economy Trade and Industry (METI)

Japan
p Auto-Bodyy Industries Association,, Inc.

Ministry of Environment (MOE)The Japan Automobile Tyre Manufacturers
Association, Inc.

National traffic safety and environment laboratory(NTSEL)

Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of JapanThe Japan Automobile Research Institute (JARI)
Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan, Inc.
(JSAE)

Japan Land Engine Manufacture Association

4

Contents ‐ 2• What is JASIC ?
 JASIC’s Activities- Cooperation
C
ti
with
ith ASIA• Activities of JASIC Jakarta Office

5

JASIC’s Activities - Cooperation with ASIA①
JASIC Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian region
PurposeTo realize international harmonization of vehicle
regulation and mutual recognition of approvals underthe 1958 agreement .
Participant
Governments and Industries of Asian area.
OrganizeThis Annually Forum is co‐organized by JASIC and agovernment of Asian country which the forum is held.
6

JASIC’s Activities - Cooperation with ASIA②JASIC Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian region
Topics of this Forum are,• Development of a VTA in each country
country.
• Accession to the 1958 Agreement and adoption of UN Regulations
necessary for a VTA.
VTA
• Basic study for MRA of a whole vehicle certification under the
UN/WP29 framework
framework.
• Arrangement of the expert meetings for well understanding of the1958 Agreement and each UN Regulation
Regulation.
The 3rd Public & Private Forum
will be held in Manila,
Manila Philippine,
Philippine
December 4th – 6th, 2012.

7

JASIC’s Activities - Cooperation with ASIA③
JASIC Asia Expert Meeting
PurposeTo improve knowledgekl d forf theh specificf items
To strengthen the cooperation among Asian countries.
P/P Joint Forum
Proposal&A
Agreementt

ReportE
ExpertMeeting
M iPeople concerned
from countries participating
the P/P Forum

ParticipationDi
Dispatcht h expertst

Support8

JASIC’s Activities - Cooperation with ASIA④JASIC Asia Expert Meeting
LectureTh 1958 Agreement
A
t
• The
• A type approval system• Environmental regulation• Safety regulation etc.
Demonstration Test
• Lighting• Noise• Etc.

9

Contents ‐ 3• What is JASIC ?
• JASIC’s Activities- CooperationCti withith ASIA

 Activities of JASIC Jakarta Office10Activities of JASIC Jakarta Office Exchange information relating to automotive regulations andcertification systems with ASEAN Member States, ASEAN Secretariat, etc.
 Provide assistance in establishing automotive regulation andcertification systems in ASEAN Member States as well as their accession to
the 1958 Agreement
 Promote JapanJapan-ASEAN cooperation in international
harmonization of regulations at the United Nation, etc.

 Enhance safety and environmental performance ofautomobiles in the ASEAN Member States Strengthen Asia’s
Asia s presence and influence in theinternational arena
11

Information of JASIC Jakarta Office<Address>Wisma 46 – Kota BNI, 19th Floor
Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 1
Jakarta 10220

12

Thank you
for yyour attention.
http://www.jasic.org/e/index_e.htm
http://www jasic org/e/index e htm
Contact address : jasic@jasic.org

Keynote Speech-1

Mr. Takao Onoda,
Director, International Affairs Office,Engineering Policy Division,
Road Transport Bureau, MLIT, Japan

Keynote Speech
The 3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
4-5 December 2012

Takao ONODA
Director,Dit IInternational
t
ti
l Aff
Affairsi Office,
Offi
Engineering Policy Division,
Road Transport Bureau
1

ASEAN – Japan Transport Partnership

Contents

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism JAPAN1. Benefits of harmonization of regulations
gandmutual recognition of certification
2. Develop partnership among Asian countries
3. ASEAN-Japan
3
S
Japa Coope
Cooperativeat e Programog a foro Vehicles
e c es4 Conclusion
4.
C
l i

2

1. Benefits of harmonization of regulations and mutual
ASEAN – Japan Transport Partnership
recognitionof certification

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism JAPAN- Through harmonization of regulations and mutual recognition of certification, it is possible to promote safer and moreenvironmentally-friendly motor vehicles around the world.
- This not only enables governments to cut administration costs, but also allows the automobile industry to reduce
development, certification, and production costs through unification of vehicle design specifications and standardization ofparts, to build up global and flexible supply chains, and, consequently, to concentrate more resources on the development ofsafety and environmental technologies.
- Motor vehicle users also benefit not only from the spread of safer and more environmentally-friendly motor vehicles, butalso from reduction in vehicle prices resulting from reduced costs
costs.

Motor Vehicle Users- Spread of safer and more environmentally-friendly
motor vehicles- Accessible vehicle prices

Harmonizationof Regulations- Unified
U ifi d designd ispecifications
ifi tiandd standardizedt d di d
Mutualparts
Recognition of- Reduced development, certification,
Certificationand production costs
pp y chains- Global and flexible supply- More resources to the development of safety
and environmental technologies

Automakers, etc.

Governments- More efficient rulemaking process- Streamlined examination process
for certification

3

ASEAN –partnershipJapan Transport Partnership
2. Develop
among Asian countries

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism JAPAN‐ Asian countries are rapidly growing.
growing They are promising auto markets and,and at the same time,
time importantinternational players. It is imperative to improve environment for automakers to play active roles in the contribution
to the growth, safety, and security of Asian countries.
‐ We will work with other Asian countries so as to enhance the contributions of Asia to WP.29 and to expand theaccession to the 1958 Agreement,
Agreement and,and as a result,result to promote the harmonization of regulations and mutual
recognition of certification for improving safety and environment.
‐ Two fronts of work: multilateral framework through government/industry joint forums, etc. and bilateral
cooperation through meetings of minister‐level officials, seminars, and dispatch of experts, etc.

Asia as Growing Auto Markets

Asia as International Partners

Promote the harmonization of regulations and mutual recognition of certification throughexpansion of accession to the 1958 Agreement for improving safety and environment
1958 Agreement
g

ASEAN

Harmonization of regulations+
Mutual recognition of certification

1998 Agreement
g

Japan

India

Korea

China
Only harmonization ofregulations
4

Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism
JAPAN3-1. ASEAN-Japan Cooperative Program for Vehicles
Background◇Rapid motorization along with economic development and globalization◇Regional environmental issues and traffic accidents become serious concerns◇Economic integration by 2015
Within the framework of “Automobile Technical Cooperation Project on Safety
and Environment” under ASEAN-Japan Transport Partnership(AJTP), MLIT ofJapan proposed to initiate a new program for further fostering cooperative
relationship with ASEAN Member States in this field.

ASEAN-Japanp CooperativepProgramg
on Development
pof Technical Regulations
gand Establishment of a Type Approval System for Vehicles(endorsed at the 8th ASEAN-Japan Transport Ministers Meeting held in November 2010 )P li dialogue
Policydi lPublic‐private
p
joint
j
forum

T i i courses
Training

Di t hi experts
Dispatchingt

Improvement of laws, regulations and organizations

Promotion of mutual recognition of approval

Development of technical regulations

Accession to the UN agreement

Establishment of a typeyp approvalpp
systemyAssessment on conformityy of p
production

Promotion of international harmonization of regulations

Appointment of the technical services
53-2. Specific Measures of the Cooperative Program

Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure,
Transport and TourismJAPANpy 2012 of the “ASEAN-Japanp CooperativepgSpecific
Measures listed in the ANNEX as of 04 July
Programon
Development of Technical Regulations and Establishment of a Type Approval System for Vehicles”

1.

Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian region
The Forum was held in November 2011 in Indonesia.

2.

ASEAN Forum on WP29
The Forum was held in conjunction with the Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian region.
The next Forum will be held in 2012 and/or 2013 (under consideration).

3.

ACCSQ-APWG Workshop
The Workshop was held one day prior to the last SEOM/ACCSQ/APWG in September 2012.
The next Workshop will be held in February 2013 in Lao PDR (under consideration).

4.

Advanced Training Course
The Training Course was held in October 2012 for about 2weeks.
Participating Countries : Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam.

5
5.

JICA Training
T i i
CourseC
The Training Course was held in November 2012 for about 2 weeks.
Participating Countries : Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Thailand

6
6.

JASIC Asia Expert Meeting
Expert Meetings were held in Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand in 2012.

7.

Technical Assistance to Philippines
A project for technical assistance to Philippines was launched in August 2011 and the firstphase ended in March 2012.

8.

Technical Assistance funded by Japan-ASEAN Integration Fund [in preparation]

6

3-2. Specific Measures of the Cooperative Program

Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism
JAPAN

1.
1 Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian region
2. ASEAN Forum on WP29
Date
PurposeNovember 2011

Place

Indonesia•Exchange views and information in the fields of automobile
technical regulations
gand a typeyp approvalpp
system.
y•Share the latest information on WP29 discussion.

Participants Brunei, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Lao PDR,
Malaysia Myanmar
Malaysia,
Myanmar, Philippines
Philippines, Singapore
Singapore, Thailand
Thailand, Vietnam
Vietnam, etc
etc.
160 representatives from both public and private sector in 2011
(Total number of participant: more than 2,000 from 19 Economies up to 2011)

Outcome- Japan has provided the latest information on WP29 activities.

- It was confirmed that Asian economies would deepen their understandings of the merits ofparticipation
ti i ti in
i WP29 andd off accession
i to
t the
th 1958 A
Agreement.
t- It was confirmed that each Asian economy may present its opinions so that their requests andproposals can be reflected at WP29.

The next Public and Private Joint Forum would be held in the Philippines this year.
7

3-2. Specific Measures of the Cooperative Program

Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism
JAPAN

3.
3 ACCSQ-APWG Workshop
Date

One day prior to the task force meeting of APWG

Place

Same venue as the APWG meeting

Participants

Representatives
pfrom ASEAN regulatorygy bodies from both transport
p andindustry sector, technical services and automotive industry

Topics Conformity of Production (COP) System under the 1958 Agreement
and Japanese System Updated movement on World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle
Regulations (WP29)
 Electric Vehicle Standard

ACCSQ: ASEAN Consultative Committee on Standards and Quality
APWG: Automotive Product Working Group
8

3-2. Specific Measures of the Cooperative Program

Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism
JAPAN

4.
4 Advanced Training Course
Date
Place

October 2012 for about 2 weeks
Japan

Purposei. Promote to apply technical regulations on safety and environmentii. Promote international harmonization of vehicle regulations on safety andenvironment and mutual recognition of type approvalParticipants Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam.
Program

LectureWorld Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP29)
1958 Agreement and UN Regulation
Latest information on discussions in WP29
Internationalization of Regulation and Certification System

Technical tourTechnical service for type approval (NTSEL)
93-2. Specific Measures of the Cooperative Program

Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism
JAPAN

5. JICA Training Course
Date
Place

November 2012 for about 3 weeks
Japan

PurposeTo provide useful advice and information and extend assistance to ASEAN
Member States so as to develop their vehicle regulations and establish typeapproval systems.
Participants

Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Thailand.

Programg

LectureMotor vehicle safety and environment regulation and certification system
Motor vehicle inspection and registration system
Motor vehicle recall system
Motor vehicle assessment
etc.

Technical tour

National Agency of Vehicle Inspection
Designated vehicle maintenance shop

etc.
10

Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism
JAPAN3-2. Specific Measures of the Cooperative Program

6. JASIC Asia Expert Meeting
Purpose(JASIC : Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center)

Dispatching JASIC experts to ASIAN countries•forf encouragementt off th
their
i b
bettertt understandingd t di off UN R
Regulations,l ti•for enhancement of their knowledge, skills, methods and•for improvement of system such as certification system, COP system practically(COP : Conformity of Production)

Process①

Arrange Experts and dispatchthem to the country to carry out
the Expert Meeting②
RequestP/P Joint Forum

items

③

Inter
communication

Country

Date

Theme

Malaysia

Jul. 2012

R100 (Electric Power Train)
R40,83 (Exhaust Emission)

VietnamAug. 2012

R34 (Prevention of Fire Risks)
RecallThailand

Aug. 2012

R80 (Seats of large passenger vehicles)
R117 (Tire rolling noise, wet grip adhesion, rolling resistance )The country arrange thevenue and collect theaudiences④

EX Meeting
M ti
11

ASEAN – Japan Transport Partnership
3-2. SpecificMeasures of the Cooperative Program

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism JAPAN7.
to
7 TechnicalT h i l AssistanceA i t
t Philippines
Phili i
Date

Augustg
2011- March 2012

BackgroundIn response to an official request from the Philippine government, Japan decided to carry out
the Project.

TopicsStudy ofo thet e current
cu e t situationss tuat o s
Analysis on the Impact of new motor vehicle regulations and certification
Development of the implementation approaches

Output

The Philippines government has established a Road Map to Accession to the 1958
Agreement and a Framework for Vehicle Regulation and Certification System.

12

3-2. Specific Measures of the Cooperative Programy Japan-ASEANpg[ preparation]p p]
8. Technical Assistance funded byIntegration
Fund [in1 : Survey of the current situations• Survey of the current situations of ASEAN countries such as existing vehicle regulations andcertification, existing system, past approach of the vehicle regulations and certification andso on.
• Case study of introduction and implementation on motor vehicle regulations andcertification
tifi ti iin JJapan andd otherth countriesti
2 : Analysis of the impact of new vehicle regulations and certification• Analysis
y of bottleneck and impact
p on safety,y, environment,, stakeholders,, societyy and so on
3 : Development of the implementation approaches• Proposal regarding concept of motor vehicle regulations and certification, implementation
system (organizational structure, role, committee, personnel), schedule of theimplementation, etc.
• Preparation of draft of new vehicle regulations and certification
4 : Seminar and training• Seminars for both public and private stakeholders and training necessary for the
implementation on new vehicle regulations and certification etc
etc.
13

ASEAN – Japan Transport Partnership

4. Conclusion

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism JAPANAsianA i economies
i can promotet saferf andd moreenvironmentally-friendly motor vehicles through theharmonization of regulations & mutual recognition ofcertification and the accession to the UN 1958 Agreement.
Japan is ready to support such efforts through “ASEANJapan Cooperative Program on Development of TechnicalRegulations and Establishment of a Type Approval System
for Vehicles” endorsed at the 8th ASEAN-Japan Transport
Mi i tMinisters
M
Meeting.
tiJapan will launch the new project funded by Japan
JapanASEAN Integration Fund (JAIF) to assist the improvementof the motor vehicle regulation and certification system so
as to enhance the safety of motor vehicles and to reduce
the environmental burden.

14

ASEAN – Japan Transport Partnership

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism JAPANThank you for your attention!

MLIT

Keynote Speech-2

Honorable Joseph Emilio Abaya
Secretary, DOTC, Philippines

Keynote Speech-3

Ir. Mohamad Bin Dalib
Chairman of ACCSQ-APWG Task ForceGuest of Honor fromLand Transportation Office, Republic of the Phillippines

Mr. Takao Onoda
Director of Road Transport Bureau
Ministry of Land Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT)
Mr. Yoshihiro Nanto
Director General
Japan Automotive Standards Internationalisation Center (JASIC)
Delegates of the Second Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
Automotive Industry Associations
Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen
A PLEASANT DAY TO ALL OF US…
First of all, I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Japan Automotive
Standards Internationalisation Center (JASIC) and Ministry of Land Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism (MLIT) of Japan for the kind invitation to me to give a Speechon the occasion of the 3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region.
It is unfortunate, however, that Mr.Isagani Creencia Erna have to attend to an
equally important commitment as part of his main obligation to service the Working
Group Meetings in ASEAN. It so happened that the events are scheduled at thesame time,so on behalf of the Task Force of APWG , I will deliver the speech for the
purpose of this forum..
In January 2011, the 1st Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region was held inJapan and it gave the opportunity for all of us to learn from the various presentations
and subsequently, In November 2011, the 2nd Public and Private Joint Forum in
Asian Region was held in Indonesia. Both Forums shared about the activities of
ASEAN in the automotive sector, in particular the activities related to the integration
initiatives in ASEAN. Never-the-less,the spirit of ASEAN is very much represented
today noting that most of the representatives of the Automotive Product Working
Group in ASEAN are joining the Forum and their collective views represent the viewof ASEAN.

Ladies and Gentlemen…
The automotive sector is one of the priority sectors identified for integration in
ASEAN with the aim of achieving ASEAN Economic Community by 2015. In the areaof standards and conformance, the support to integration initiative is geared towards
reducing, if totally eliminating, technical barriers to trade (TBT). In this regard, theAutomotive Product Working Group (APWG) was established by the ASEAN
Consultative Committee for Standards and Quality (ACCSQ) to study and develop
mechanisms to address trade barriers caused by differing standards and technicalregulations in the automotive sector. For the benefit of non-ASEAN delegates, theACCSQ is the sectoral body in ASEAN created by ASEAN Economic Ministers andmandated to address Technical Barriers to Trade in the priority product sectors in theregion in order to facilitate the free flow of quality and safe goods in ASEAN.
Tariffs and duties of imported goods have significantly reduced in ASEAN which
encourages trade in the region, however if other impediments to trade, such ascompliance to technical regulations of importing country still exists then theprobability of delaying the entry of products could happen. This is where theelimination of TBT comes into the picture.
For its part, the Automotive Product Working Group has made progress on
identifying and developing mechanism to reduce TBT to facilitate trade of automotive
products in ASEAN through, among others:• Harmonisation of Standards and Technical Requirements;• Mutual Recognition of Conformity Assessment Results; and,• Capacity Building Programmes, among its various activities.
These three mechanisms are the main focus of my speech in this Forum.
Firstly, Harmonisation of Standards and Technical Requirements…
Using international standards as basis of national standards is one of the importantelements in harmonisation. The APWG has agreed on adopting UNECE Regulations
as basis of common standards and technical requirements for ASEAN. As we allknow UNECE Regulations is the internationally recognised Regulations or
requirements in the automotive sector. In order for the automotive products to be
sold globally, it has to meet UN regulations. Countries with automotive
manufacturing industry have to put into consideration the international Regulations
for global market and competitiveness.
While it is acknowledged that each Member State has its own prioritisation in termsof the applicable UN regulations to be applied nationally, it is worthwhile to mention
that in ASEAN, 19 UNECE Regulations have been agreed for harmonisation by 2015.
It took a significant amount of time to arrive at the common UNECE regulations forharmonisation in ASEAN noting the different level of capability and technicalinfrastructure of ASEAN Member States. Agreeing with 19 UNECE Regulations isjust the beginning of the harmonisation process. The more challenging part of
scrutinising the relevant UNECE regulations to have unified standard and technicalrequirements is yet to be seen and awaits further discussions. One thing for sure,using common reference standard as basis of test and certification, provides
opportunity for wider market access and international recognition. Harmonised
standards and technical requirements are pre-requisite to mutual recognition.
This brings me to the second trade facilitation mechanism – Mutual Recognition ofConformity Assessment Results
With the common basis of test and certifications for the product, coupled by testing
and certification at the source country on behalf of the importing country reduces theburden of duplicate testing and certification. This is the principle behind thedevelopment of Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRA) for Type Approval ofAutomotive Products in ASEAN.

Some country requires testing and certification or approval of product against a
standard prior to selling in their country in order to make sure that the products aresafe and of good quality. At times this requirement is incorporated in the laws, rules
or regulations of the country making compliance to standards mandatory. Thissystem has been accepted as a legitimate right of a country in order to enforce acertain requirements. However assuring the safety and quality of the product does
not necessarily require testing by importing country alone noting the equally reliable
and competent testing and certification bodies available for the product outside thecountry.
The ASEAN MRA on Type Approval for Automotive Products provides a regionalarrangement to accept testing and certification issued by competent Technical
Services following the competence criteria and procedure stipulated in the MRA. The
competent criteria follow the internationally acceptable system and procedures inconformity assessment system in order to gain benefits of the already existing
technical infrastructure by the countries. The MRA has also taken into consideration
the UN 1958 Agreement as the base criteria of recognition and procedures.
The ASEAN MRA on Type Approval of Automotive Products is progressing in its
development however I must admit that there are important issues that need to beaddressed before ASEAN can move further in the completion of MRA. These steps
are important in making sure that everyone are achieving common objective for the
benefit of all ASEAN Members.
It is also important for all ASEAN Members to fully appreciate the MRA mechanism
to make it useful and beneficial not only for those who have the capability to utilize it
fully but would also provide avenue for those who are still developing theirautomotive industry to see greater opportunity for them. The MRA therefore serves
as a capacity building for the industry.
Capacity Building Programme is important component for harmonisation andmutualrecognition.
ASEAN is privileged to enjoying generous support from donor countries or dialogue
partners in pursuing the integration initiative agenda in ASEAN. Japan for instancehas been at the forefront in providing this support in the automotive sector by way of
training, workshops, meetings and conferences.

Previously, there was a workshop on Vehicle Type Approval (VTA), Conformity of
Production (COP) procedure and UN regulations held in July 2011 in Jakarta has
provided clearer picture in approaching a harmonised UN regulations and MRAs.
The APWG had a problem in determining the differences among the 19 UNECE
regulations in terms of specific requirements of each UN Regulations. The workshop
had provided the needed information on the different versions of each UNECE
Regulation which the APWG was looking for clarification.
The various trainings and workshops in the past have definitely provided inputs inwhat the APWG has reached so far in the area of harmonisation and mutual
recognition.

This Third Private/Public Forum is another opportunity of capacity building for
ASEAN as delegates participate in the discussion through exchange of informationand sharing of experiences with other countries and be updated on thedevelopments in the automotive sector not only in Asia but also in the world.
Ladies and Gentlemen…
I shared some mechanisms that ASEAN through the Automotive Product Working
Group is doing. Let me summarise this by saying that …
- the work of harmonisation and mutual recognition are the key mechanisms
towards trade facilitation in ASEAN;- the automotive sector is following these steps and is progressing one step at atime;
- moving forward with common goal and vision are important to advance together
as a Region;- reducing the development gap in ASEAN between countries with advance
automotive industry and countries with newly developing automotive industry isenhancing ASEAN as a region.
- this would not be possible without the support of generous and kind assistancefrom dialogue partners. The APWG would be able to achieve its milestone as it
continues to work together and shape the ASEAN automotive industry as a region
towards a single community in 2015.
In closing, let me thank once again Japan Automotive Standards
Internationalisation Center (JASIC) and Ministry of Land Infrastructure, Transport
and Tourism (MLIT) of Japan for this opportunity; and of course to the government ofIndonesia for hosting this important event.
I wish every one a productive and fruitful Forum.
TERIMA KASIH...

Report-1:
Report from Industries

Mr. Kiminori Hyodo
Chairman of Regulation and Certification
Systems Committee, JAPIAJAPIA

JAPAN AUTO PARTS INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION(1/55)

Our Asian Internationalization
accelerates
the worldwide
Prosperous economy
and Safe vehicle society
with international Regulation and MRAof Components and Vehicles
Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
4,5, Dec. 2012
Mr.Kiminori HYODO(2/55)JAPIAMy presentation Agenda
1- Asian Power in 21st Century
2- Internationalization accelerates Asian
Competitive Power
3- The closest path for Internationalization
4- Merits of UN-Reg(1958 Agreement)
5- How about current situation in Asia?
6- Certification System of Components
and Vehicles
7- Our Collaboration among Auto Parts
Industries Associations In the world1

(3/55)JAPIA

1Our Asian Power

in
21st Century

JAPIA

10
8

(4/55)

Forecast of World Population( billion )Our Asian opinions should becontributed to the global market
and international rules.

Asia
AfricaAmerica
EuropeOceania

6

4

2050

2040

2030

2020

2010

2000

1980

1960

1940

1920

0

1900

2

2

JAPIA

Forecast of World Automobile production(5/55)

Million vehicles

100

90

Oceania80

Africa70
Middle East

60

Central andSouth America
North America

50
40
30
20

Our Asian opinions should becontributed to the global automobile
market and international rules.

10

Europe(includ
e NIS)
Asia

02008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

(6/55)

JAPIA

21st Century:

Motorization in Asia

- Vehicle production in Asia will significantly
increase in the years ahead

Asian Countries
Vehicles and Parts- Multi-polar production andlocal procurement of parts inside Asia
- A center of Automobile supply to Worldwide market3

(7/55)JAPIA

2Internationalization
accelerates
Asian Competitive Power(8/55)JAPIA

Asian competitive power ofAutomobile industry
will become stronger by

the Internationalization ofRegulation and Certification system
of Vehicles and Components4

(9/55)JAPIA

Asian Countries
Vehicles and Parts

Common International Regulation(Requirement)
andCommon International Certification system(10/55)JAPIA

3UN-Reg(1958 Agreement)
is closest pathforInternationalization5

(11/55)

JAPIA

To guarantee Safety
To keep Environment
To do Worldwide business

UN-RegUN-RegUN-Reg(1958 Agreement) is
the most appropriate and closest path (tool)
to realize our Asian internationalizationand competitive power in worldwide market.

JAPIA

Regulations and Certification Systems:
Expected Role of our Asia

(12/55)・ Internationalization for Reg & Certification
・ Harmonize Activity between Asian Countries
Based on UN-Reg

・ Mutual recognition of Certification in Asia
Based on 1958 Agreement
WP29
Harmonize
Activity

UNRegXX

Introduce and Harmonize Activity

Regulations
Certification
AsianCountries6

(13/55)JAPIA

Asian Countries
Vehicles and Parts

with

E certification

UN-Reg 1958 Agreement

JAPIA(14/55)The Contracting Parties of the 1958 Agreement

76 countries (49 + EU 27 ) are the members.
147

(15/55)

JAPIA

4Merits of

UN-Reg(1958 Agreement)(16/55)JAPIA

Let’s review
UN-Reg 1958 Agreement

Aim : To achieve the safety vehicle society
and prosperity in the world.

Methods :1) Harmonization of Requirements2) MRA(Mutual Recognition of Approvals)

8

JAPIA(17/55)• It is relatively easy to place products
reflecting new technologies on the market.
– Technical requirements of UN Regulation are established at aninternational level.

• Existing technologies can be also used
continuously..
• Products with the same spec can be distributed tomany countries.
– Technical requirements of UN Regulations are international and havebeen already accepted in many countries.
– It will get easy to distribute vehicle equipment/parts, as internationalcommodities.

Many countries will benefit by technologies with anadequate level of safety/environmental performance.

JAPIA(18/55)• if One certification (E-Approval) becomes sufficient
as a proof of conformity to each domestic regulation
by adopting UN Regulations, the placing on themarket of vehicle equipment/parts, as internationalcommodities, will get easier in each country.
– Overlap of tests and procedures for certification will be avoided.
– That leads to lower costs.
– End users in each country may be able to use vehicle equipment/partsin the same performance level.

Those measures have great advantage forend users, as well as manufacturers.

9(19/55)

JAPIA

5How about

the current situationin our ASIA?

(20/55)JAPIA

How about the direction of current
Asian situation ?
UNReg

To guarantee Safety
To keep Environment
To do Worldwide business

UN-RegUN-Reg(1958 Agreement) is
the most appropriate and closest path (tool)
to realize our Asian internationalizationand competitive power in worldwide market.

10

(21/55)

JAPIA

How about the direction of current
Asian situation ?
1) Harmonization of Requirements
UN-RegTo guarantee Safety
To keep Environment
To do Worldwide business

UN-RegUN-Reg(1958 Agreement) is
the most appropriate and closest path (tool)
to realize our Asian internationalizationand competitive power in worldwide market.

JAPIA1) Harmonization of Requirements

current situationin AsiaReg. for Asian
country A(22/55)

UN-Reg.

Reg. for Asian
country B

Unique req.
Unique req.
Unique req.
against UN Reg between Asia against UN Reg

Our Asian countries should discuss the necessityof our unique requirements.
1) If they are reasonable, unique requirements
may be remained.
2) If they are unreasonable, unique requirements
should be harmonized.

11

JAPIA

1) Harmonization of Requirements(23/55)current situationin Asia
UN-Reg.

Our
wish
Reg. for Asian
country B

Reg. for Asian
country A

Unique requirement
against UN Reg

Unique requirement
against UN Reg

JAPIA1) Harmonization of Requirements(24/55)current situationin Asia
UN-Reg.

Our
wish

Reg. for Asian
country A
Unique requirement
against UN Reg

Reg. for Asian
country B
Unique requirement
against UN Reg

12

JAPIA10(25/55)

Forecast of World Population( billion )Our Asian opinions should becontributed to the global market
and international rules.

8

Asia
AfricaAmerica
EuropeOceania

6

4

JAPIA

2050

2040

2030

2020

2010

2000

1980

1960

1940

1900

0

1920

2

Forecast of World Automobile production(26/55)

Million vehicles

100

90

Oceania80

Africa70
Middle East

60

Central andSouth America
North America

50
40
30
20
10

Our Asian opinions should becontributed to the global automobile
market and international rules.

Europe(includ
e NIS)
Asia

02008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 201613

(27/55)JAPIA

Our Asian Power in 21st Century
Forecast of World Population
Forecast of World Automobile production

Our Asian opinions should becontributed to the global automobile
market and international rules.

JAPIA1) Harmonization of Requirements(28/55)

Reasonable unique requirements
Revise
WP29
Unique req.

Reasonable

UNregulation

GRs
Proposal
to revise

Our Asian
opinion14

(29/55)

JAPIA

How about the direction of current
Asian situation ?
2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
To guarantee Safety
To keep Environment
To do Worldwide business

UN-RegUN-RegUN-Reg(1958 Agreement) is
the most appropriate and closest path (tool)
to realize our Asian internationalizationand competitive power in worldwide market.

JAPIA2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)(30/55)

UN-Reg 1958 Agreement

E certification

Some Individual certification systems
in Asia countries

?
? ?

15

JAPIA

2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
current situation in Asia

(31/55)country Individual certification Individual marking
yes
A
yes
B
yes

C

.
.
Individual
approval
marking

Component

E

JAPIA

2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
current situation in Asia

(32/55)country Individual certification Individual marking
yes
A
yes
B
C

.

yes
Cost up

Re-making samples
Re-sending samples
Re-making test-standRe-testing in Laboratory
Re-making application doc.
Re-certification
Re-adding other marking

D
C
B
A

Expenseon users

E

16

JAPIA

2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)(33/55)Component

Individual
approval
marking

E

Cost up
Re-making samples
Re-sending samples
Re-making test-standRe-testing in Laboratory
Re-making application doc.
Re-certification
Re-adding other marking

D
C
B
A

Expenseon users

E2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals) (34/55)
Our wishComponent

JAPIA

Individual
approval
marking

E

Cost up
Re-making samples
Re-sending samples
Re-making test-standRe-testing in Laboratory
Re-making application doc.
Re-certification
Re-adding other marking

D
C
B
A

Expenseon usersE17

(35/55)

JAPIA

6Certification SystemofComponents and Vehicles(36/55)

JAPIA

Ideal certification system
of Components and Vehicles
to realize
our Asian internationalization
andcompetitive power in worldwide
market18

(37/55)

JAPIA

Certification of Vehicle

Certification of
Certification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofcomponent C component
Certification of component B
Certification ofCertification ofcomponent D Certification ofcomponent F component
component E

.
.

..

.
.

.
.

(38/55)

JAPIA

Ideal certification system
of Components and Vehicles

Common International Regulation
andCommon International Certification19

(39/55)

JAPIA

Imagine again
Imagine there's no heaven
it's easy if you try
no hell below us
above up only sky
imagine all the people
living for today...

～John Lennon～

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you canno need for greed or hunger
a brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
sharing all the world...

Imagine there's no countries
it isn't hard to do
nothing to kill or die forno religion too
you may say I'm a dreamer
imagine life in peace...
but I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
and the world will be as one(40/55)JAPIA

Let’s Imagine ～ G / I meeting members ～If each countries has
Individual Test Report (requirements)
andIndividual Certification system

20

Certification of Vehicle
in country A(41/55)JAPIA
Certification of
Certification of Vehicle
Certification of Vehicle
component A Certification ofCertification ofCertificationinofcountry B
component B component C
in country A
component
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.

Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component B component C
component
component
Certification of
Certification of
Certification ofcomponentD
CertificationofCertification of
Certification ofcomponent D Certification of
Certification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
component
component E.
component.
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
Certification of Vehicle
.
.
.
.
.
in country C
Certification of Vehicle
in country D

Certification of Vehicle
in country E

Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component
Certification of
Certification of
Certification of
Certification ofcomponentD
Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
component B component C
component B component C.
.
component
component.
.
.
Certification of
Certificationof.
Certificationofcomponent D Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification of
Certification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
.
component
component
component E
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Certification of Vehicle.
.
in country C(42/55)JAPIA
Certification of
Certification of Vehicle
Certification of Vehicle
component A Certification ofCertification ofCertificationinofcountry B
component B component C
in country A
component
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.

Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.

Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.

But individual Certificate
in each ASEAN countries ?

If MRA = Common Test Report in ASEAN？

(Draft) ASEAN MRA

Test Report MRA
Certification MRA

21

Certification of Vehicle
in country A(43/55)JAPIA
Certification of
Certification of Vehicle
Certification of Vehicle
component A Certification ofCertification ofCertificationinofcountry B
component B component C
in country A
component
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.

Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component B component C
component
component
Certification of
Certification of
Certification ofcomponentD
CertificationofCertification of
Certification ofcomponent D Certification of
Certification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
component
component E.
component.
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
Certification of Vehicle
.
.
.
.
.
in country C

Even if we have common
MRA Test Report

Certification of Vehicle
in country D

Certification of Vehicle
in country E

Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component
Certification of
Certification of
Certification of
Certification ofcomponentD
Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
component B component C
component B component C.
.
component
component.
.
.
Certification of
Certificationof.
Certificationofcomponent D Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification of
Certification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
.
component
component
component E
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Certification of Vehicle.
.
in country A(44/55)JAPIA
Certification of
Certification of Vehicle
Certification of Vehicle
component A Certification ofCertification ofCertificationinofcountry B
component B component C
in country A
component
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.

Common ASEAN
Components certifications
for all ASEAN countries

Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component B component C
component
component
Certification of
Certification of
CertificationofcomponentD
Certification of
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
component
component E.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
Certification of Vehicle .
.
.
.
.
.
in country C
Certification of Vehicle
in country D

Certification of Vehicle
in country E

ASEAN MRA
Certification

Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component
Certification of
Certification of
Certification of
Certification ofcomponentD
Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
component B component C
component B component C.
.
component
component.
.
.
Certification of
Certificationof.
component D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
component.
component
component E
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

ASEAN MRA
Test Report22Certification of Vehicle
in country A(45/55)JAPIA
Certification of
Certification of Vehicle
Certification of Vehicle
component A Certification ofCertification ofCertificationinofcountry B
component B component C
in country A
component
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.

CommonASEAN
Commoninternational
Components certifications
for Worldwide
all ASEAN countries
countries

Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component B component C
component
component
Certification of
Certification of
Certification ofcomponentD
CertificationofCertification of
Certification ofcomponent D Certification of
Certification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
component
component E.
component.
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
Certification of Vehicle
.
.
.
.
.
in country C
Certification of Vehicle
in country D

Certification of Vehicle
in country E

ASEAN MRA
Certification

E Certification

Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component
Certification of
Certification of
Certification of
Certification ofcomponentD
Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
component B component C
component B component C.
.
component
component.
.
.
Certification of
Certificationof.
Certificationofcomponent D Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification of
Certification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
.
component
component
component E
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

ASEAN MRA
Test Report(46/55)JAPIA

If ASEAN MRA will be applied for
only local manufactured products
in ASEAN countries.

ASEAN MRA will be closed forthe future to international business？

(Draft) ASEAN MRA

for local manufactured products
for marketed products( local manufactured & imported )23

(47/55)JAPIAASEAN MRA will be applied forthe marketed products( local manufactured & imported )ASEAN MRA will be open for
the future to a center ofInternational automobile
supply to worldwide market？

(Draft) ASEAN MRA

for local manufactured products
for marketed products( local manufactured & imported )Certification of Vehicle
in country A

JAPIA(48/55)

Open to the Ideal futureof ASEAN

Certification of
Certification of Vehicle
Certification of Vehicle
component A Certification ofCertification ofCertificationinofcountry B
component B component C
in country A
component
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.

CommonASEAN
Commoninternational
Components certifications
for Worldwide
all ASEAN countries
countries

Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component B component C
component
component
Certification of
Certification of
CertificationofcomponentD
Certification of
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
component
component E.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
Certification of Vehicle .
.
.
.
.
.
in country C
Certification of Vehicle
in country D

Certification of Vehicle
in country E

ASEAN MRA
Certification

E Certification

Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component
Certification of
Certification of
Certification of
Certification ofcomponentD
Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
component B component C
component B component C.
.
component
component.
.
.
Certification of
Certificationof.
component D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
component.
component
component E
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

ASEAN MRA
Test Report24Certification of Vehicle
in country A

JAPIA(49/55)

Open to the Ideal futureof ASEAN

Certification of
Certification of Vehicle
Certification of Vehicle
component A Certification ofCertification ofCertificationinofcountry B
component B component C
in country A
component
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.

Common international
Components certifications
for Worldwide countries

Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component B component C
component
component
Certification of
Certification of
Certification ofcomponentD
CertificationofCertification of
Certification ofcomponent D Certification of
Certification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
component
component E.
component.
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
Certification of Vehicle
.
.
.
.
.
in country C
Certification of Vehicle
in country D

Certification of Vehicle
in country E

Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component
Certification of
Certification of
Certification of
Certification ofcomponentD
Certification of
Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
component B component C
component B component C.
.
component
component.
.
.
Certification of
Certificationof.
Certificationofcomponent D Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification of
Certification ofcomponent. F
component. F.
.
component
component
component E
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

E certification(50/55)
Open to the Ideal future
Common International certifications for all countriesof ASEAN

JAPIA

Certification of Vehicle
in country B

Certification of Vehicle
in country A

country A

country B

country C

country D

country E

Common international
Components certifications
Common for Worldwide countries
IWVTA
Internationalcountry F

Vehiclecertifications
for all countries

country G

country H

country M……….

International Whole Vehicle Type Approval
Certification of Vehicle
in country C

Certification of Vehicle
in country D

Certification of Vehicle

in country E
Important essential Base = Components certifications

CommonInternational
Components
certifications
for all countries.
.

Certification ofcomponent A Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent B component C
component
Certification ofcomponent D Certification ofCertification ofCertification ofcomponent. F.
component
component E
.
.
.
.
.
.

E certification

.
.

.
.

25

(51/55)

JAPIA

7Our Collaboration
among
Auto Parts Industries
Associationsin the world(52/55)JAPIA

We have close Collaboration
among Asian Auto Parts Industries Associations- Information exchange of regulatory matter in each country- Technical discussion- Harmonization activity based on UN-regulation
Thailand(TAPMA)

Vietnam(VAMA)

BruneiSingapore

China (CAAM)
Asian Lighting TechnicalCommittee

India (ACMA)

Indonesia(GIAMM)

Philippine(MVPMAP)
MyanmarEurope(CLEPA)

Cambodia

Taiwan(TTVMA)

Malaysia(MACPMA)

Laos

Korea
(KAICA)

Japan (JAPIA)USA(MEMA)
Brazil(Sindipecas)

26

JAPIA(53/55)

Summary ( Let’s do ! )in order to achieve the safety vehicle society
and prosperity in Asia, effectively.

Finally,
To contract 1958 agreement and accept
UN-Regs (MRA) as many as possible,
In transitional period*,*: Until the completion to contract the agreement or to accept the UN regs1)To accept UN-Reg approvals E (top priority)2)To refer UN-Regs into their national
regulation as alternative, or3)To harmonize requirements with UN-Reg
as soon as possible.

(54/55)JAPIA

SafetyDriving

Keep
Environment
Comfortable
Driving27

JAPIA

JAPAN AUTO PARTS INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION(55/55)Let’s challenge together
harmonization activity
for Requirement and MRA in Asia

Thank you for your attention

JAPIA

28

Debriefing session
and discussion for WP29

Mr. Ushio Ueno
Executive Director,
Japan Automobile Standards
Internationalization Center (JASIC)

Recent matters on WP29

U hi UENO
Ushio

158th WP29 session

Date 13 - 16 November, 2012

Chairman : Mr. B. Gauvin （France )Vice Chairman ： Mr. B. Kisulenko （Russian federation )List of participants
Government ：Australia; Austria; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Canada; China; Croatia
Croatia, Czech Republic; Denmark;Estonia; Finland; France; Germany; Hungary; India; Italy,
Japan; Latvia; Luxembourg; Netherlands; Norway; Poland;
Korea; Romania; Russian Federation; Slovakia;
S
C
Colombia,
South Africa; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; UK; US; EU
Non GovernmentN
Gt：
ISO, AIT/FIA, OICA, IMMA, CLEPA, ETRTO, CITA etc.
2

Chairman/Vice-Chairman of WP29/GR
Asian countries will become Vice-Chairman of GR
Meeting
WP29
GRRF (Brake)
GRB (Noise)
GRE ((Lamp)p)
GRPE (Emission)
GRSG (General Safety)
GRSP (Passive Safety)

ChairmanVice-Chairman

FranceUK
FranceCanadaRussiaJapan
Russia(To be confirmed)

Germany
Italy
USA

India
Hungary
Korea

Recent GR’s Sessions
GRRF (Brakes and running gear)
Proposal on Lane Keep Assist System (LKAS)and Parking Assist
System (PAS) will be proposed soon by Japan
R30, 54: definition of snow tire
GRB (Noise)
Further amendment of Noise regulation (R41 and R51)GRSG ((General Safety)y)
Amendment on R34 and R46 will be proposed soon by Japany((ISO discussion first))
R46 camera, monitor system
R43 plastic glazing
Regulation
on new technology,
and
off Regulations
for
R
l i
h l
d Amendments
A
d
R
l i
f
IWVTA are discussed.

New regulations agreed
New regulation for

New regulation for

Advanced Emergency
B ki SBraking
Systemst(AEBS)

Lane Departure Warning
S t
Systems(LDWS)

Radar or Laser systems detect if vehicle infront is too close

System warns when driver is crossing
road markings

Brakes may be applied automatically ifnecessary

Can also warn when there is a vehicle in
the adjoining lane.

New regulations agreed
New regulation for CRS (ISOFIX universal Integral CRS)
ISOFIX Child Restraint System
ISOFIX lower anchorage

UN R14, 16 are also amended with new CRS regulation

Agreed amendments of ASEAN 19 UN Regulations

Reg. No

Regulation

Document No.
ECE/TRANS/WP.29/

Contents

R14-07
Supp 4
Supp.4

Safety belt
anchorages

2011/97, 42

Clarification, and Add
requirements for new CRS

R16-06
Supp.3

Safety belts

2012/43

Add requirements for new CRS

R46-04

Devices forindirect vision

2012/87(See next slide)

R49 06
R49-06
Supp.1

Emissions of
LPG and CNG
engines

2012/103, corr.1

Add dual fuel engine
requirement

R83-06
R83
06
Suppl.3

Emissions of
M1 & N1

2012/104 105
2012/104,105

Review definition of gas fuelvehiclesNeed to follow amendment of UN regulations

Agreed amendments of ASEAN 19 UN Regulations
UN R46-04 (Devices for indirect vision)

Requiring larger required view of Class VI mirrors forN2 and N3 vehicles.

Other topics at WP29
Proposals of new GTR- Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicles (HFCV)- Tyres- Worldwide harmonized Lightg Vehicle Test Procesures ((WLTP))- Pole Side Impact (PSI)- Electric Vehcles (EV)- Quiet Road Transport Vehicles (QRTV) …..
NNew
approachh tto llamp regulations
l ti
Consolidate current 47 lamp component regulations to 11 regulations
Ch
Changetto P
Performance-basefbrequirementsitSummary- ManyM
new UN R
Regulations
l ti
andd GTR are (and( d will
ill be)b ) establishedt bli h d
CRS, AEBS, LDWS….

- 19 UN Regulations (ASEAN to introduce) are always updated
UN R13,, 13H,, 14,, 16,, 17,, 25,, 30,, 39,, 40,, 41,, 43,, 46,, 49,, 51,, 54,, 60,, 75,, 79,, 83: UN Regulation amendments agreed at 157th WP29
: UN Regulation amendments agreed at 158th WP29

- 1958 agreement will be revised to be more attractive to the countries
other than Europe, and IWVTA Regulation will be established.
Need to follow up WP29 discussion

Need to exchange information andstudy about WP29 topics in Asia

Discussion for the future Forumbased on 6th series

Coordinator:
Mr. Takaki Kasai
Co-Chairman, International Cooperation
Committee, JASIC

Roadmap of the 6th Series
Public and Private Joint Forumin Asian region
Takeshi Ishikawa
Chairman, International Cooperation Committee

Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center
http://www.jasic.org
1

The 6th Series New Theme:Promotion of the International Whole VehicleType
yp Approvalpp((IWVTA)) concept
p under the UN
Regulation framework for realizing harmonizationof regulations
gand establishingg Mutual
Recognition of Approvals (MRA) in the region

 Period:

5 years from 2011 to 2015

Page:2

The 6th Series
 Objectives① To
T establish
t bli h a cooperation
ti systemt
f furtherforf thinternational harmonization activities so that each
Asian economy understands the WP29 activities andthe merits of accession to the 1958 Agreement throughthe Public and Private Joint Forum.
② To coordinate and communicate integrated Asian
voice
oice to WP29 for development
de elopment of the IWVTA andtechnical regulations.
③ To promote understanding on the IWVTA concept forpof the regionalgcommon Whole Vehicle
development
Type Approvals system through the ASEAN MRA
activities.
Page:3p of the 6th Series
Roadmap
 Objectives① To establish a cooperation system for further international harmonization activities sothat each Asian economy understands the WP29 activities and the merits of accession
to the 1958 Agreement through the Public and Private Joint Forum.

【Measures】
Establish a new function of public andprivate joint forum led by each Asian
economy’seconomys government / industry
organizations
Establish a framework that enables us toshare the Asian fundamental p
policyy Establish a cooperative network that enable
the unification of Asian economy’s opinion
 With the expansion of contracting parties of1958 Agreement in the region, establish atask force for discussion of common issues
on harmonization of regulations andcertification systemFiscal Year (Apr. ~ Mar.)
2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Preparation
step formembershipp

Step of participationand the expansionof adoption

Step ofsubjective
participation
for WP29

Agree on Establish aframework fortheRoadmap discussion on
f dfundamentalt lpolicies

Consider cooperative
network vision((vision of a new Public
and private joint
forum)

Hold a new
function
forum byA i
Asian
economyinitiative

Encourage non- 58 agreement member
country to participate in WP29
Technical understanding activities by expert meeting

Page:4

p of the 6th Series
Roadmap
 Objectives② To coordinate and communicate integrated Asian voice to WP29 fordevelopment of the IWVTA and technical regulations
regulations.
【Measures】
 Ideal revision on current 58 agreement for the sake

Fiscal Year (Apr. ~ Mar.)
2011

2012

Understanding of
Agreement, Technicalregulations, Typeapproval system

2013

2014

Step of accession
and the expansion of
adoptionof Asian economy’s positive participation to referbetter proposal into WP29 and reflect the Asian
opinion for WP29 as necessary
 Consideration of Ideal IWVTA so that Asian
economy can make positive adoption and reflect
Agreeg
on Consolidate
the Asian opinion for WP29 as necessary
Asian
the
economy’s
Roadmap In response to the current technology level,issuesconsider the requirement and the technology levelsuitable for Asian economies and reflect the Asian
Consider the issues which werediscovered during
opinion for WP29 as necessary“Reflection for WP29 “ activities
 Discuss about “Advanced technology” related to
the future technical regulations

2015
Step ofsubjective
participation
for WP29

Create/submitAsiancooperative
proposals to
WP29

Page:5p of the 6th Series
Roadmap
 Objectives③ To promote understanding on the IWVTA concept for development of theregional common Whole Vehicle Type Approvals system through theASEAN MRA activities.
Fiscal Year (Apr. ~ Mar.)【Measures】
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
 Consideration of harmonized vehicle

type approval system suitable for
ASEAN
 Understanding of IWVTA concept According to IWVTA and suitable for
ASEAN, consideration of; Vehicle type, category, etc.
 Applicable regulation items
 Requirement and technology level

Understanding of
IWVTA concept,
summary of
ASEAN issue

Step of vision ofharmonized vehicle
ype appapprovalo a syssysteme
type

Agree on Consolidate
th
the
A i
Asian
Roadmap economy’s
issuesConsider the issues
which werediscovered during“Consideration of
ASEAN harmonizedvehicle type approvalsystem”

Formulationand proposal

Formulate
ASEAN
harmonizedvehicle typeapprovalysystem Step by step consideration of expansionof required items
Consideration of minimization withunique requirements
Page:6

Th k you ffor your kindThankki d attentioniPage:7

Debriefing session and discussion
for the 1958 Agreement and IWVTA

Mr. Johan Renders
European Union
Mr. Takao Onoda
Director, MLIT, JapanDG Enterprise and Industry

Review of the 1958 Agreement
objectives & perspectives
Johan RENDERSLegislative Officer
Sustainable mobility &Automotive Industry Unit

3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
17th JASIC ASIA Government / Industry Meeting
December 4‐6, 2012, Manila‐Philippines
Department of Transportation and Communications

1

LAND TRANSPORTATION OFFICE

DG Enterprise and Industry

Sustainable Mobility &Automotive Industry Unit

objectives of the 1958 Agreement review
Maintain robust & reliableinternational framework,
ensuringg highg levelof safety &environmental
protection

Accommodate
the needs ofemerging
countries

3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
17th JASIC ASIA Government / Industry Meeting
December 4‐6, 2012 2 Manila‐Philippines

Sustainable Mobility &Automotive Industry Unit

DG Enterprise and Industry

Proposed actions to make 1958 Agreementgmore attractive:
What will be maintained?
Countries which are using self‐certification in their national legislation, are
not prevented from becoming Contracting Party to the 1958 Agreement andto apply its UN Regulations

Application of UN Regulations nationally is not related to the existence of a
type approval system.

The rights of new Contracting Parties to the 1958 Agreement to declare thatthey will not apply certain Regulations or any of them.



Right to start applying a Regulation at a later stage



Right to cease application of a Regulation
3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
17th JASIC ASIA Government / Industry Meeting
December 4‐6, 2012 3 Manila‐Philippines

Sustainable Mobility &Automotive Industry Unit

DG Enterprise and Industry

Proposed actions to make 1958 Agreementgmore attractive:
What will be new?

 Address the need for accommodating different levels ofstringency in the application of UN Regulations by creating thepossibility for Contracting Parties to issue and accept type‐approvalsl according
di to earlier
li versionsi
off UN R
Regulationsl i Flexible voting procedure: a Contracting Party can delegate inwriting its presence for the purpose of the determination of thequorum and the right to vote on its behalf to anotherC t ti P
ContractingPartyt or regionalil economic
i integrationi tti organization
i ti
to which the delegating CP belongs.
3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
17th JASIC ASIA Government / Industry Meeting
December 4‐6, 2012 4 Manila‐PhilippinesDG Enterprise and Industry

Sustainable Mobility &Automotive Industry Unit

Proposed actions to make 1958 Agreementgmore attractive:
What will (need to) be confirmed/clarified?

 the principle of mutual recognition of type‐approvals:
type approvals:
CPs applying a Regulation cannot be obliged to accept typeapprovals issued pursuant to earlier versions of UN Regulations+
CPs issuing type approvals pursuant to earlier versions of UN
Regulations cannot refuse type approvals issued pursuant to thelatest version of these UN Regulations
 special character of Regulation R0 on IWVTA (depending on theapproach to be selected for the flexibility scheme).
3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
17th JASIC ASIA Government / Industry Meeting
December 4‐6, 2012 5 Manila‐Philippines

DG Enterprise and Industry

Sustainable Mobility &Automotive Industry Unit

Proposed actions to make 1958 Agreementgmore attractive:
Rights and Obligations of Contracting Parties applying a UN Regulation
all CPs applying
pp y g a UN Regulationghave to accept
p type‐approvals
yp pp
based on thelatest version of that UN Regulation
all CPs applying a UN Regulation are entitled, when complying with thecompetence criteria in Article 2, to issue type approvals pursuant to the latest
version of that UN Regulation
all CPS applying a UN Regulation have the right to participate in the
preparation and voting of future amendments to that UN Regulationa CP applying a UN Regulation may also issue type‐approvals pursuant toearlier versions of the UN Regulation (i.e. to preceding amendments or to
the unamended UN Regulation)
Regulation), but other CPs applying the same UN
Regulation cannot be obliged to accept such type‐approvals
3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
17th JASIC ASIA Government / Industry Meeting
December 4‐6, 2012 6 Manila‐PhilippinesDG Enterprise and Industry

Sustainable Mobility &Automotive Industry Unit

Proposed actions to improve the functioning and reliability of the 1958 Agreement:

Article 1:

clarification of what UN Regulations shall cover(performance oriented requirements)



Article 2:

clearer and enhanced conditions to issue type‐approvals+ more detailed provisions on Conformity of Production(Appendix 2)+ inclusion of criteria for technical services in Appendix 2

Article 3:

clarification of the principle of mutual recognition oftype‐approval certificates

Article 4:extended safeguard provisions, in particular with regard to
approved vehicles which nevertheless presenting a serious risk
3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
17th JASIC ASIA Government / Industry Meeting
December 4‐6, 2012 7 Manila‐Philippines

DG Enterprise and Industry

Sustainable Mobility &Automotive Industry Unit

Proposed actions to improve the functioning and reliability of the 1958 Agreement:

Article 10: how to solve diverging interpretation issues between CPs
concerning the application of UN Regulations(details in Appendix 2)Article 11: consider appropriateness of maintaining the exclusion clause

Article 12: clarification of transitional provisions, in particular in view ofthe possibility toissue typetype‐approvals
approvals pursuant to earlier
versions of UN Regulationspamendment procedurepfor new technologiesg+ specialArticle 13: flexible amendment procedure for Appendix 2
3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
17th JASIC ASIA Government / Industry Meeting
December 4‐6, 2012 8 Manila‐Philippines

Sustainable Mobility &Automotive Industry Unit

DG Enterprise and Industry

Proposed actions to improve the functioning and reliability of the 1958 Agreement:Appendix 1: possibility for CPs to vote by delegation+ flexible amendment procedure for Appendix 2Appendix 2: more detailed provisions on Conformity of Production+ inclusion of criteria for technical services+ how to apply for and how to conduct type‐approval,
as well as how to amend type‐approvals+ procedures for resolving interpretation issues
pamendment procedurespfor new technologiesg+ special+ general conditions for virtual testing

3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
17th JASIC ASIA Government / Industry Meeting
December 4‐6, 2012 9 Manila‐Philippines

Sustainable Mobility &Automotive Industry Unit

DG Enterprise and Industry

Next steps : Consider feedback from the 3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region Next drafting subgroup meeting on 22 + 23 January 2013 in Tokyo Meetings
M i
off IWVTA group andd draftingd f i subgroupsbfromf
6 to 8 March
M h 2013 (Paris)(P i )
to prepare submission of drafting proposals to WP.29‐159
Amend agreement

 Discussion in WP
WP.29‐159
29 159 with feedback to IWVTA group and drafting subgroup for
finalising the draft proposal for the review of the 1958 Agreement

3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
17th JASIC ASIA Government / Industry Meeting
December 4‐6, 2012 10 Manila‐Philippines

Panel Discussion:
Part I
Requests to the 1958 Agreement and IWVTA
from Asian economies and its reflection result,and the future request
including the UN Regulation and GTR

Coordinator: Mr. Michio Miyamoto (Japan)
Panelists:
Japan, Malaysia, Thailand, India,
Indonesia, Philippines

Q S TOO WP2929 FORO FUTURE
REQUESTDEVELOPMENT(PANEL DISCUSSION 1)
AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING DIVISIONROAD TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT OF MALAYSIA
1

CONDITION IN MALAYSIA
1)

2)

Weather in Malaysia :‐ hot and humid throughout the year
‐ average rainfall 250 cm/year‐ average temperature 27 degree
Traffic situation in Malaysia (2010)
Year

2009

2010

Population

28,310,000

28,910,000

Vehicle ®

19,016,782

20,188,565

Accidents

397,330

414,421

Road Deaths

6,745

6,872
2

REGULATIONS UNDER WP29
1)2)

Requirements regulate based on
weather and traffic condition in Europep
Example :‐ Extreme cold
ld conditiond‐ dummy size and etc

3

Q
REQUEST
TO WP29
1)

To consider weather and traffic condition
in ASEAN‐ size of dummy‐ heavyhrain‐ crowd on the road4

THANK YOU

5

Th il d’ Request
Thailand’sRt on
the 1958 Agreement and IWVTA

Automotive Engineering Bureau
Department of Land Transport
November 2012

Amendment of 1958 Agreement• Add essential appendices for equal
implementation of CP with the sameunderstanding• Open local conditions as an option in
UN regulations as appropriate• Correct existing of voting system for
more fairer
fairerAdding Essential Appendices•Qualification of technical services•Procedure of type approval•Whole vehicle type approval

Recommendation on IWVTA• IWVTA should be a voluntary
regulation like others• List of UN regulations under
IWVTA
A should
h ld beb divided
di id d toessential one and optional one bysafety and environment criteria

Local conditions• Open local conditions as an option in
UN regulations as appropriatee.g.
­ use ambient temperature during
the test­ skip any test which is required for
CPs with non­non­tropical climate only

Voting system• Correct existing off voting system forfmore fairer by increasing majority
vote e.g. 4/5, but not consensus vote– increase importance of anindividual CP– encourage any individual CP toexpress his opinion< ThankTh k you>

The 3rd Public and Private Joint Forumin Asian Region- Day 2 -Country Report“Short Presentation and speech on thedevelop the vehicle type approval systems
in each Asian country”

Brunei
CambodiaHong Kong
Indonesia
Korea
Lao PDR
Malaysia
MyanmarSingapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei
Japan
PhilippinesQUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE 3rd P/P JOINT FORUM
QUESTION 2:

YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THE WP29 ACTIVITIES

2-1. WP29 & GRs participation- Participation record for 2012 and future plan for 2013
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan

2012 records: We have been attending all of WP29 and GR meetings held so far and willattend all the forthcoming meetings as well.
Japan has been participated since 1977. In the beginning, Japan participated as observer.
2013 plans: We will attend all the meetings.

Korea
Laos
Malaysia

MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand
Vietnam2012 records: NONE
2013plans:Participate in the meeting hold by WP.29&GPs program
2012 records: 1 time2013 plans: 1 time
2012: records: In JASIC Asia Government/Industry Meetings, Myanmar has been
participating as an observer. At present, we apply and refer some of UNECE regulations indomestic type approval system.
2013: plans: We keep on cooperating with ASEAN and Japan for International Whole
Vehicle Type Approval System.
Plan to participate in WP29 & GRs as an observer.
DLT : 2012 records : 157th WP.29
2013 plan:
160th WP.29, GRE
2012 records: Not attanding any WP29 and GR meetings
2013 plans: Not yet

Chinese Taipei- Name of participating organization (Such as specific authority in charge and relevant organizations)
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand

Vietnam

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism(MLIT)
and Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center(JASIC)
NONE
Ministry of Transport
Road Transport Department of Malaysia (JPJ)
If Myanmar becomes one of the brethrens of WP 29 and GR, Road Transport
Administration Department under Ministry of Rail Transportation and Ministry of Industry
will be the participating organizations.
Land Transport Authority (LTA), Singapore
1. Department of Land Transport, Ministry of Transport
2. Thai Industrial Standards Institute, Ministry of Industry
3. Thai Automotive Industry Association
4. Automotive Industry Club of Federation of Thai Industries- Ministry of Transportation.
- Agency: Vietnam Register (Department of Ministry of Transportation)- Concerned body: No

Chinese Taipei-1-2-2. Accession to the 1958 Agreement and/or 1998 Agreement- For Contracting Party to the Agreement(Problems and tasks after the accession to the 1958 Agreement, etc. / Solutions or countermeasures forthe problems and tasks)- For Non-Contracting Party to the Agreement(Planned year of the accession to the 1958 Agreement / Status of progress of the accession procedure,
the action plan up to the accession / Problems and tasks concerning the accession, etc. / Solutions orcountermeasures for the problems and tasks)
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia

Japan

Post-participation problems:
When an ECE regulation was introduced in Japan, it had been reflected to the domestic
regulations after translated into Japanese.
This process made the work for amending the domestic regulations longer andcumbersome and therefore, it was difficult to response timely to the amendments to the
ECE regulations established at the WP29 three times a year.
Problem/issue resolution measures:
The process for amending the domestic regulations was improved in 2006, in which thetechnical requirements in the ECE regulations are directly referred to in the domestic
regulations.
This change in the process saves time and efforts for the work for amending the domestic
regulations and enables us to response to incorporation of the amendments to the ECE
regulations in a timely manner.

Korea
Laos

Malaysia
MyanmarScheduled year for participation: NOT YET SCHEDULE
Progress of participation procedures, action plan up to participation: NONE
Participation problems, etc: NONE
Problem/issue resolution measures: NONE
Acceded to both agreement since 4th April 2006
Post-participation problems: Technical Specification Understanding/Interpretation
Problem/issue resolution measures: Training
To accede the WP 29 Agreements, it is still needed to improve infrastructure, technology,
rules and regulations in vehicle manufacturing procedures.

Philippines

Singapore

Thailand

VietnamPlease see comments below for Non-Contracting Party
Scheduled year for participation:
No schedule for accession to the 1958 and 1998 Agreements.
Progress of participation procedures, action plan up to participation:
Considering benefits of signing the 1958 and 1998 Agreements.
Participation problems, etc:
Manpower and financial resources required to attend WP29 and GR meetings to monitor
new development/amendments to UNECE Regulations.
Problem/issue resolution measures:Singapore is not a vehicle-manufacturing country. We currently accept vehicles that havebeen designed and constructed to comply with UNECE Regulations and do not subject
vehicles to additional tests. Hence, we are already market-friendly. Therefore, there is nocompelling basis(strong justifications) nor immediate need to sign the 1958 and 1998
Agreements.
Post-participation problems: Lack of experts, Technical knowledge of UN/ECE regulations
Problem/issue resolution measures: Arrange expert meeting in Thailand, staff training
oversea
Non-Contracting Party
Scheduled year for participation: 2014
Progress of participation procedures, action plan up to participation: preparing new projectto push up the process (highly support from vice-ministerial level)-2-Participation problems, etc: Lack of expertise, testing facilities, take time from relevant
stakeholders’ comment
Problem/issue resolution measures:- Updating about process of 1958 agreement revise- Review of current applied regulation- Becoming observer of WP29 meeting.
- Staff training and expert meeting on technical Regulation- Further discusions/meetings among some Ministries- On process to get approval for the new project to push up
Chinese Taipei

2-3. What is your plan regarding the adoption UN/ECE Regulations?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand

Please see Answer sheets
For the time being, it cannot be designated.
Please see Answer sheets
There is no plan for ECE adoption but this issue is arranging to discuss among thestake-holders soon.

VietnamChinese Taipei

2-4. What is your practice or plan regarding the application of UN Regulations?
- Method of adoption: Accept or Refer to the UN Regulations
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore

Thailand

Method 1
NONE
Accept
For the situation of Myanmar, we can refer to the UN Regulations
Already accept UNECE certificates and test reports without subjecting vehicles to further
tests. Also progressively make direct reference to UNECE Regulations in our technicalregulations.
- Using the relevant UNECE regulation as equivalent- Accept test report issued by technical services under 1958
Agreement as optional-3-

UN/ECEcertificate
Vietnam

Imported vehicle/ Accept
Component
Local Assembled Refervehicle/Component

UN/ECE test
reportAcceptRe-testingin yourcountry
None

Issue
individual
certificate
Yes

Individual
approval
marking
None

Not accept

Yes

Yes

None

Chinese Taipei-4-

QUESTION 3: COMMENTS FOR PANEL DISCUSSION
3-1. When is the target for complicating the vehicle type approval system?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Vehicle Type Approval system (VTA) has been already established in Japan.
In Japan, there is the governmental system which gives “certification” as the proof ofconformity of vehicles with the technical requirements regarding the safety andenvironment of motor vehicles.
This system can be separated into two groups according to motor vehicles themselves andtheir components for its own.
Japan

At first, the system in which the motor vehicles themselves are given certificates is called“Vehicle Type Approval System”.
Secondly, there is the certification called “Type Approval System for Devices” to improve
the safety for the components of automobile like headlights or tires.
In fact, when Japan became the first non-European country to join the 1958 Agreement on
the mutual recognition of approvals in 1998, this Type Approval System for Devices was
newly introduced to utilize the harmonization of vehicle regulations and mutual
recognition of approvals under the 1958 Agreement.

Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand

VietnamUNDER STUDY
Already established
Although we could not establish Vehicle Type Approval system, we refer and apply 1958
Agreement and its amendments in our domestic vehicle industry.
Already have a vehicle type approval system.
New draft Act of Land Transport is jointly considering by DLT and the Council of State.
And it will take time for the consideration of the Parliament. However current vehicle parts
type approval system, which is accumulated subset of whole vehicle type approval, isgradually triggered this year onward.
Viet Nam already has Vehicle/Component type approval system. These systems areclose to Type approval system under the 1958 Agreement

Chinese Taipei

3-2. What are the reasons behind not setting a schedule for adopting the UN-R items?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
Myanmar

LACK OF KNOWLEDGE
Not Applicable
Barrier for setting a schedule for the ECE items would be:1) We are still observing2) We are not ready to adopt those items right now3) We would like to take time for above mentioned matter

Philippines-5-

Singapore

Thailand

VietnamChinese Taipei

Already accepts vehicles that have been designed and constructed to comply with UNECE
Regulations or other international standards such as the Japanese Safety Regulations and
US Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, or their equivalent.
One Notification on Vehicle Part/System Type Approval System (R41) which is in linewith UN regulation has been implemented the beginning of this year. This is an
opportunity for both government and (motorcycle) industry sectors to acquaintance withthe type approval on UN regulation. More further notification regarding to vehicle
part/system type approval system will be issued in future. After this step, plan for
adopting UN Regulations will be discussed among the stake-holders.
N/A

3-3. How do you minimize your unique subjects?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
IndonesiaJapan

It should be considered that the international system which aims to minimize uniquesubject of each country, for example, notification of technically rational explanation andconcrete contents of unique subjects to the countries adopting IWVTA.

Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines

Giving option to industry to choose UN R or MS-

Singapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei
APWG TF

We plan to progressively incorporate the other UNECE Regulations in our technicalregulations.
Introducing notification in line with UN regulations as many as possible and also
encourage WP.29 to draft UN Regulations on essential subjects for vehicle.
Applying new project to support for
Establish ASEAN Automotive Committee (AAC)-6-

QUESTION 4: ASIA EXPERT MEETING

4-1. Expert Meeting Plan
In your country, are there any plans to hold some Expert Meeting(s) within three years from now on?
(Agenda, Contents, and Name of person in charge of Expert Meetings planned in 2013. 2014, and 2015)
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos

Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand

Vietnam2013: PLANED
2014: PLANED
2015: PLANED
2013: Construction of Vehicle (Including Protection) (UN R36,52,58,73,93,and 107)
2014: Prevention of fire risk (R34) and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) : R10
2015: Mechanical Coupling (R55), Interior Fitting (R21),External Projection(R26)
No specific plan. We will consider participating in such Expert Meetings on an ad hoc
basis.
2013: UN regulations concerning electric vehicle (safety and environmental aspects)
2014: R87, R123
2015 : R12, R94, R95
2013: Agenda: August 2013
Content: Electric Vehicle
Res Person: Vietnam Register
2014: Vehicle recycle and In-use motorcycle emission polution inspection
2015: N/A

Chinese Taipei

4-2. Any other comments
Do you have any request for, opinions about, or other comments regarding the Expert Meetings?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei

NONE
N.A
-

-7-

SPECIAL QUESTIONAIRE
Question 1: Tasks to Be Addressed Regarding Objective 1 (Collaboration Towards
Promoting Regulation Harmonization Activities) of the Public and Private Joint
Forum in Asian Region
1-1. Any idea for gathering and summarizing Asia’s opinions on WP.29?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong

Indonesia

IASIF

Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarJPJ
MORTPhilippines

DOTC1) Establish platform communication concerning every result of WP29 Meeting.
2) Highlight the revision from the last version of ECE Regulations in each GR meeting
and which was adopted by WP29 voting conclusion, and distribute to the each
ASIA’s economy.
3) Ask respond from each ASIA’s economy related with each economy’s condition.

conduct meeting back-to-back with ACCSQ-APWG meeting
A website for gathering and summarizing Asia’s opinions on WP 29 should be set up.
To formally create a focus group (technical working group (TWG)) with member
from Asian Region to discuss and come up with a road map of accession to WP29

Singapore
Thailand

DLT

Vietnam

VR

Chinese Taipei

VSCC

Unofficial discussion via e-mail. But if you need official reply, it should be an official
letter.
agree with suggestion
Hold discussion meeting back to back P&P meeting
Set up a website
To collect practical information and summarize, a Certification Circle is first priority toestablish. A Certification Circle is a group of experts for communicating, sharing anddiscussing the relevant experience and idea. The next step would be setting up a
website to make experience exchange efficient and to develop as a Knowledge
Management.

1-2. Any idea for communicating Asia’s opinions on WP.29 to the UN?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
Indonesia

IASIF

Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarJPJ
MORTPhilippines

DOTC1). Concluded the items which will be summited to WP-29 in the Public and Private
Joint Forum in Asian Region.
2). Encourage each economy to attend and present their respective ideas /opinions.

conclusion (wrap-up) through back-to-back meeting with ACCSQ-APWG
NA
In the case of the Philippines, its roadmap for accession to WP29 is already finalized.
Every member economy may attend workshop where each plans or road map arepresented.

Singapore
Thailand

DLT

Vietnam

VR

Chinese Taipei

VSCC

Yes, delegate of each contracting party in Asia can present his/her opinion at WP.29. If
Asia countries are non CP of Agreement under WP.29, it may request the Chairman of
WP.29 to present their opinion.
Communicate through about mentioned meeting and e-mail by representatives
In contrast to the idea of EU, Asia-oriented Forum could also be reasonably allowed to
be a member of WP29.

-1-1-3. Any idea for reflecting these opinions by utilizing the Public and Private Joint Forum?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
Indonesia

IASIF

1) Yes, the Asia’s opinions on WP29 be included in the Summary of Public andPrivate Joint Forum.
2) In the Public and Private Joint Forum, assigned the representative of Asia’s
economies to present the opinions to the WP29.

Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia

JPJ

Myanmar

MORT

Philippines

DOTC

Singapore
Thailand
Vietnam

DLT
VR

Chinese Taipei

VSCC

Budget which already confirmed for Public and Private Forum can be used to assist the
ACCSQ-APWG meeting
NA
Creating a website where members can register opinion and recommendation or holdregular meeting, seminars/workshops
It is possible if these opinions are only preliminary.
Updating situation in P & P meeting
WP29 should allow the opinions to be reflected by the Forum as a position such as
observer or else proper, any member of which can decide any time to attend relevant
and interested meeting. To have all the expert travel a long way at least twice a year isvery restricted for any country to follow and be present. It also is a contradiction to theglobal goal for CO2 emission reduction.

-2-

Question 2: Tasks to Be Addressed Regarding Objective 2 (Reflecting Opinions on
the 1958 Agreement and IWVTA at WP.29) of the Public and Private Joint Forum in
Asian Region?
2-1. Consensus
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
Myanmar

IASIF

Still need coordination and consolidation among Stakeholders.

JPJ
MORT

Malaysia already acceded WP29 since 4th April 2006.

Philippines

DOTC

-

Singapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei

DLT
VR
VSCC

- 1 Take a long procedure for approval from high-level official-

The Philippines due to the recently completed JICA assistance have adequate
information on the 1958 Agreement

2-2. Human resources
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
Myanmar

IASIF

Still in the process to assign dedicated personnel to handle this issues.

JPJ
MORT

Malaysia already established 2 special units to handle VTA and Regulations issues.

Philippines

DOTC

-

Singapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei

DLT
VR
VSCC

- 2 Lack of experienced person; English barrier-

Identify country focal person who will react on all communications and activities
relate to 1958 Agreement

2-3. Knowledge/experience
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India

IASIF

- Capacity-building is not going well, not related with competency based- Not enough knowledge & experiences to establish technical Services,
certification, needs more on the job training- Need certification of personnel with no experience as well as preparatory
workshops on the internationalization of automotive standards.
- We didn’t know that we can use Technical Services in other regions.

Malaysia

JPJ

Even the special units already established, Malaysia still required frequent trainings
to ensure the competency of all officers.

Myanmar

MORT

Philippines

DOTC

Indonesia

Japan
Korea
Laos

-

We have people who got his information from JICA assisted project but isdispensing the assignment adopting multi-tasking due to limited resources

Singapore-3-

Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei

DLT
VR
VSCC

3

lack of experience then need training-

2-4. Funding
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos

IASIF

We have yet prepared budget, because this activities is not in the priority program.

Malaysia

JPJ

Describe specifically: Although there are required big amount of money to join
WP29, Malaysia is currently trying our best to participate in WP29.

Myanmar

MORT

Philippines

DOTC

-

Singapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei

DLT
VR
VSCC

- 2 financial limitation-

There is a need to train people in the accreditation of technical services, including
staff of the technical services itself

2-5. Organization
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei- We have established IASIF (Indonesia Automotive Standard Internationalization
Forum)- We are in the preparation to level up IASIF to be IASIC as permanent body withspecial staffs.

IASIF

JPJ
MORT
DOTC

JPJ will handle the implementation of UN Regulations in Malaysia
-

DLT
VR
VSCC

- 3 We have yet to establish a group capable of handling the issues-

Limited fiscal resources and no dedicated office to handle the activities

2-6. System (UN-related problems)
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
IASIF

- We do not understand the accreditation system for the reputation of Technical
Services accredited by designated body authorized by WP29
- Difficult to propose the new UN Regulation because of current voting system.

Malaysia

JPJ

Each contracting parties agreed the agreement upon consultation with related
agencies in the respective countries. Therefore, any changes in the agreement itself
must be referred to the related agencies especially Attorney General Chamber

MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand

MORT
DOTC

-

Fair chance and voting power among member economies such as voting rights

DLT

-

-

Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos

-4-

Vietnam

VR

Chinese Taipei

VSCC

2 We would like to be explain again voting system of 1958 Agreement
WP29 is a area handling worldwide automobile issue. It focuses on the benefits ofeliminating the technical barrier and promoting harmonization. With this in mind,
Any economic area should be covered and allowed to attend. So WP29 should betransformed into Economy-oriented instead of Nation-oriented.

2-7. System (National problems)
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei- Still need coordination and consolidation among Stakeholders- There is not enough testing facility or trained testing personnel

IASIF

JPJ
MORT
DOTC
DLT
VR
VSCC

The amendment of the original agreement may reflect the gazette act in Malaysia.
-

Limited manpower, testing facilities and financial resources

2

There is a lack of testing facility and trained testing personnel-

2-8. Regulations (UN-related problems)
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
IASIF

Some of the regulations are unnecessary in Asia. E.g., cold emission requirements
are unnecessary

Malaysia

JPJ

UN should consider the weather conditions worldwide, not limited to European
countries only.

MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand

MORT
DOTC

-

Voluntary imposition on the part of the member economy is preferred

DLT-

Vietnam

VR

Chinese Taipei

VSCC

some difference in vehicle using condition then need difference in some item
application of regulation(ex: cold emission)-

Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos

2-9. Regulations (National problems)
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos

IASIF

We have not decide the priority UN Regulations for ASEAN MRA.

Malaysia

JPJ

Most of latest amendment regulations may be adopted in Malaysia. However, it isstill required the implementation of previous series for Emission related items (fuelquality).

MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand
Vietnam

MORT
DOTC

-

DLT
VR

- 2 -

There is a need to standardize/harmonize classification and regulation-5-

Chinese Taipei

VSCC

-

2-10. Social conditions
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos

IASIF

There is no merit for us since we don’t export complete motor cycles.

Malaysia

JPJ

Implementation of UN Regulations will ensure the safety of vehicles and users.
Therefore, Malaysia is supporting the harmonization of WP29

MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei

MORT
DOTC

-

DLT
VR
VSCC

- 3 No obstacle-

The Philippines is not strong in vehicle export

2-11. Other
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia

JPJ

Myanmar

MORT

Philippines
Singapore
Thailand
Vietnam

DOTC

-

DLT
VR

Chinese Taipei

VSCC

x Thailand is already a contracting party of 1958 Agreement.
NA
WP29 is a area handling worldwide automobile issue. It focuses on the benefits of- eliminating the technical barrier and promoting harmonization. With this in mind,
Any economic area should be covered and allowed to attend. So WP29 should betransformed into Economy-oriented instead of Nation-oriented.

Myanmar is not a car manufacturer country. At present, we cannot even produce theparts of the car. To accede the 1958 Agreement or 1998 Agreement, it needs topromote our existing situation such as rules and regulations, infrastructure, system,
funding, capacity-building and human resources. Technology, skill employees andadequate test machines should be installed. So, not only inter governments’ effort
but also external partner governments’ or international organizations’ supports are
actual needed.
There is a need to support the export of CBU industry in the country-6-Question 3: Tasks to Be Addressed Regarding Objective 3 (Development of Vehicle
Type Approval System under the ASEAN MRA) of the Public and Private Joint Forumin Asian Region
3-1. Can you understand what the IWVTA is for (its concept and merits)?
If “No”: Is there anything that you need to know to understand it?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei

IASIF

Yes

JPJ
MORT
DOTC

Yes
Yes
Yes

DLT
VR
VSCC

Yes

-

No re-test => save money-

3-2. Can you propose to apply your country’s vehicle certification system to the ASEAN MRA
without any modification?
If “No”: What changes should be made to your certification system so that it can be applied?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos
Malaysia

IASIF

No

Under study

JPJ

No

Myanmar

MORT-

There are lot of discussion must be conducted before we can answer this question
To answer the question, it needs to discuss between the related organizations in
our country.

Philippines
Singapore
Thailand
VietnamChinese Taipei

DOTC

Yes

DLT
VR
VSCC

Yes

Because our system is mostly based on EU’s system--7-

Question 4: Are there any items that you would like us to support and for which our
support would be effective?
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Laos

IASIF

Malaysia

JPJ

MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore

MORT
DOTC

Thailand

DLT

VietnamChinese Taipei

VR
VSCC

Yes, based on the above answer we would like to discuss the items with JASIC.

We would like to support continuous cooperation between Japan and ASEAN
especially Malaysia.
More inputs on vehicle regulations and technical services implementation
Local conditions should be allowed as the option e.g. local ambient temperature for
conducting the test.
Training and supporting testing facility--8-

Regulation list of M1(Passenger vehicle) for vehicle type approval
Attachment 4
Economy : JAPAN#Please enter 'x' mark in the corresponding column with reference to a question 2-4-1.

ECE
No.

Item

Adopt Accept

3 REFLEX REFLECTORS
4 REAR REGISTRATION PLATE LAMPS
6 DIRECTION INDICATORSFRONT AND REAR POSITION(SIDE) LAMPS,
7STOP LAMPS AND END-OUTLINE MARKER LAMPS
10 ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
11 DOOR LATCHES & HINGES
13H BRAKING (M1,N１)
14 SAFETY BELT ANCHORAGES
16 SAFETY BELTS
17 SEATS
19 FRONT FOG LAMPS
21 INTERIOR FITTINGS
23 REVERSING LAMPS
26 EXTERNAL PROJECTIONS
28 AUDIBLE WARNING DEVICES
30 PNEUMATIC TYRES (PASSENGER VEHICLE)
34 PREVENTION OF FIRE RISKS
37 FILAMENT LAMPS
38 REAR FOG LAMPS
39 SPEEDOMETER
43 SAFETY GLAZING MATERIALS
44 CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEMS
45 HEADLAMPS CLEANERS
46 REAR-VIEW MIRRORS
48 INSTALLATION OF LIGHTS
51 NOISE
55 MECHANICAL COUPLING
64 TEMPORARY-USE SPARE WHEELS/TYRES
77 PARKING LAMPS
79 STEERING EQUIPMENT
83#Imprementation/planmethodTHE EMISSION OF POLLUTANTS ACCORDING TO
ENGINE FUEL REQUIREMENTS

Refer

Imprementation/plandate(year)

Effective date
for new type of
vehicle(year)

for new
vehicle(year)

Approval
Authority

Technical
Services

remarkAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdopted

ECE
No.

Item

#Imprementation/planmethodAdopt Accept

Refer

Imprementation/plandate(year)

Effective date
for new type of
vehicle(year)

for new
vehicle(year)

Approval
Authority

Technical
Services

85 MEASUREMENT OF ENGINE POWER
89 SPEED LIMITATION DEVICES
91 SIDE-MARKER LAMPS

AdoptedPROTECTION OF THE OCCUPANTS IN THE EVENT94
OF A FRONTAL COLLISIONPROTECTION OF THE OCCUPANTS IN THE EVENT95
OF A LATERAL COLLISION
98 GAS-DISCHARGE HEADLAMPS
99 GAS-DISCHARGE LIGHT SOURCES
100 BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLES
101

AdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedEMISSION OF CARBON DIOXIDE AND FUELCONSUMPTION (PASSENGER CAR)

112 HEADLAMPS (WITH AN ASYMMETRICAL PASSING BEAM)
116 PROTECTION AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED USE
117

remarkAdoptedAdoptedTHE APPROVAL OF TYRES WITH REGARD TOROLLING SOUND EMISSIONS

119 CORNERING LAMPSTHE LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF
121
HAND CONTROLS, TELL-TALES AND INDICATORS
123 ADAPTIVE FRONT－LIGHTING SYSTEMS
125 THE FORWARD FIELD OF VISION

Adoptedx

2013(provisional)

undecided

undecided

MLIT

NTSEL

”Adopt” means “use the UN/ECE certificate for the vehicle (component) type approval / mutual recognition systems as the Contracting Party of
the 1958”.
”Accept” means “use the UN/ECE certificate for your approval” or “use the UN/ECE certificate for your test result even without adoption of
UN/ECE regulations under the Contracting Party of 1958 Agreement”.
”Refer” means “introducing the technical requirements of the UN/ECE regulations into your own country laws or/and regulations sometimes
adding or changing some of them.”

AdoptedRegulation list of N1(Light duty track) for vehicle type approval
Economy : JAPAN#Please enter 'x' mark in the corresponding column with reference to a question 2-4-1.

ECE
No.

Item

#Imprementation/planmethodAdopt Accept

3
4
6

REFLEX REFLECTORSREAR REGISTRATION PLATE LAMPSDIRECTION INDICATORSFRONT AND REAR POSITION(SIDE) LAMPS,
7STOP LAMPS AND END-OUTLINE MARKER LAMPS
10 ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
11 DOOR LATCHES & HINGES
13 BRAKING (N, M2, M3, O)
13H BRAKING (M1,N１)
14 SAFETY BELT ANCHORAGES
16 SAFETY BELTS
17 SEATS
19 FRONT FOG LAMPS
21 INTERIOR FITTINGS
23 REVERSING LAMPS
28 AUDIBLE WARNING DEVICES
34 PREVENTION OF FIRE RISKS
37 FILAMENT LAMPS
38 REAR FOG LAMPS
39 SPEEDOMETER
43 SAFETY GLAZING MATERIALS
44 CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEMS
45 HEADLAMPS CLEANERS
46 REAR-VIEW MIRRORS
48 INSTALLATION OF LIGHTS
51 NOISE
54 PNEUMATIC TYRES (COMMERCIAL VEHICLE)
61 EXTERNAL PROJECTIONS (COMMERCIAL VEHICLE)
77 PARKING LAMPS
79 STEERING EQUIPMENT
83

THE EMISSION OF POLLUTANTS ACCORDING TO
ENGINE FUEL REQUIREMENTS

85

MEASUREMENT OF ENGINE POWER

Refer

Imprementation/plandate(year)

Effective date
for new type of
vehicle(year)

for new
vehicle(year)

Approval
Authority

Technical
Services

remarkAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdopted

ECE
No.

Item

89
91

SPEED LIMITATION DEVICES
SIDE-MARKER LAMPS95

PROTECTION OF THE OCCUPANTS IN THE EVENTOF A LATERAL COLLISION#Imprementation/planmethodAdopt Accept

Refer

Imprementation/plandate(year)

Effective date
for new type of
vehicle(year)

for new
vehicle(year)

Approval
Authority

Technical
Services

remarkAdoptedAdopted98 GAS-DISCHARGE HEADLAMPS
99 GAS-DISCHARGE LIGHT SOURCES
100 BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Adopted

101

EMISSION OF CARBON DIOXIDE AND FUELCONSUMPTION (PASSENGER CAR)112

HEADLAMPS(WITH AN ASYMMETRICAL PASSING BEAM)

Adopted

116 PROTECTION AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED USE

Adopted117

THE APPROVAL OF TYRES WITH REGARD TOROLLING SOUND EMISSIONS

Adopted119 CORNERING LAMPS
121

THE LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF
HAND CONTROLS, TELL-TALES AND INDICATORSx
2013(provisional)

undecided

undecided

MLIT

NTSEL

123 ADAPTIVE FRONT－LIGHTING SYSTEMS”Adopt” means “use the UN/ECE certificate for the vehicle (component) type approval / mutual recognition systems as the Contracting Party of
the 1958”.
”Accept” means “use the UN/ECE certificate for your approval” or “use the UN/ECE certificate for your test result even without adoption of
UN/ECE regulations under the Contracting Party of 1958 Agreement”.
”Refer” means “introducing the technical requirements of the UN/ECE regulations into your own country laws or/and regulations sometimes
adding or changing some of them.”

AdoptedRegulation list of L(Motorcycle) for vehicle type approval
Economy : JAPAN#Please enter 'x' mark in the corresponding column with reference to a question 2-4-1.

EC
E
No.

Item

#Imprementation/planmethodAdopt Accept

Refer

Imprementation/plandate(year)

Effective date
for new type of
vehicle(year)

for new
vehicle(year)

Approval
Authority

Technical
Services

remarkAdopted3 REFLEX REFLECTORSFRONT AND REAR POSITION(SIDE) LAMPS,
7 STOP LAMPS AND END-OUTLINE MARKER LAMPS

9 NOISE (THREE-WHEELED VEHICLES)
10 ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
28 AUDIBLE WARNING DEVICES
37 FILAMENT LAMPS
39 SPEEDOMETER

40 EXHAUST EMISSION (MOTOR CYCLE)
41 NOISE (MOTOR CYCLE)

AdoptedAdoptedAdoptedx

2013(provisional)

undecided

undecided

MLIT

NTSEL

46 REAR-VIEW MIRRORS

47 EXHAUST EMISSION (MOPED)50 LIGHTS (MOPED, MOTOR CYCLE)
53 INSTALLATION OF LIGHTS (MOTOR CYCLE)
60 DRIVER OPERATED CONTROLS (MOPED, MOTOR CYCLE)
62 PROTECTION AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED USE (MOTOR CYCLE)
63 NOISE (MOPED)74 INSTALLATION OF LIGHTS (MOPED)75 PNEUMATIC TYRES (MOPED, MOTOR CYCLE)
78 BRAKING (CATEGORY L)
81 REAR-VIEW MIRRORS (MOTOR CYCLE)
112 HEADLAMPS (WITH AN ASYMMETRICAL PASSING BEAM)

113 HEADLAMPS (WITH A SYMMETRICAL PASSING BEAM)”Adopt” means “use the UN/ECE certificate for the vehicle (component) type approval / mutual recognition systems as the Contracting Party of the 1958”.
”Accept” means “use the UN/ECE certificate for your approval” or “use the UN/ECE certificate for your test result even without adoption of UN/ECE regulations under
the Contracting Party of 1958 Agreement”.
”Refer” means “introducing the technical requirements of the UN/ECE regulations into your own country laws or/and regulations sometimes adding or changing someof them.”

AdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedAdoptedMalaysia
Gazette and Enforcement of UN Regulations
Statistic of Gazette and Enforcement of UN Regulations
Gazette Year

Number of UN Regulation

1997

3

2007

12

2010

4

2011

35

2012

1

TOTAL

55

Department/Agencies
Involved
Department of Environment(DOE)

Ministry of Transport (MOT)and Road Transport
Department (RTD)

Table A : Gazette between Year 1997 to 2010
No.

UN
Description
Regulation

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.

R 15
R 49
R 24
R 66
R 30
R 54
R 108
R 109
R 16
R 36
R 48
R 52
R 80
R 98
R 99
R 116
R 97
R 18
R 62

Exhaust Emission
Diesel Emission
Diesel Smoke
Superstructure Strength Of Public Service Vehicle
Pneumatic Tyres
Pneumatic Tyres (Commercial Vehicle)
Retreaded Pneumatic Tyres
Retreaded Pneumatic Tyres (Commercial Vehicles)
Safety Belt
Construction On Public Service Vehicle
Installation Of Lights (HID)
Construction Of Small Capacity Public Service Vehicle
Seats (Large Passenger Vehicle)
Gas Discharge Headlamp
Gas Discharge Headlamp (Light Sources)
Protection Against Unauthorized Use
Vehicle Alarm System
Protection Against Unauthorized Use
Protection Against Unauthorized Use

Gazette Date

Enforcement
Date

1 January 1997

1 January 1997

19 November
2007

7 April 2010

1 January 2008
1 January 2010
1 January 2010
1 January 2010
1 January 2010
1 January 2010
1 January 2012
1 January 2012
1 January 2012
1 January 2012
1 January 2012
1 January 2012
1 July 2010
1 July 2010
1 January 2012
1 January 2012

Table B : Gazette in Year 2011
Gazette Date : 15 December 2011
Enforcement Date : 1 January 2012 (Enforced through VTA Application only)
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.

UN
Regulation
R100
R3
R6
R7
R13
R13H
R14
R17
R25
R28
R39
R40
R41
R43
R46
R48*
R50
R51
R53
R58
R69
R70
R73
R75
R78
R79
R81
R83
R90
R93
R94
R95
R104
R112
R113

Description
Construction of Battery Electric Vehicle
Reflex Reflector
Direction Indicators
Front and Rear Position (Side) Lamps, Stop Lamps and End-Outline Marker
Braking
H-BrakingSeatbelt Anchorage
Seats
Head Restraint
Audible Warning Device
Speedometer
Exhaust Emission (Motorcycle)
Noise (Motorcycle)
Safety Glass
Rear-view Mirrors
Installation of Lights (HID)
Lights (Motorcycle)
Noise
Installation of Lights (Motorcycle)
Rear Under-run Protection
Rear Marking Plates for Slow Moving Vehicle
Rear Marking Plates for Heavy and Long Vehicle
Lateral Protection (Goods Vehicle)
Tyre (Motorcycle)
Braking (L Category)Steering Equipment
Rear-view Mirrors (Motorcycle)
Gaseous Pollutants
Replacement Brake Lining Assemblies
Front Under-run Protection
Protection of the Occupants in the event of a Frontal Collision
Protection of the Occupants in the event of a Lateral Collision
Retro-reflective Markings for Heavy and Long Vehicles
Headlamps (Assymetrical)
Headlamps (Symetrical)

Table C : Gazette in Year 2012
Gazette Date : 4 April 2012
No.

UN Regulation

1.

R22

Description
Protective Helmet & Visor for driver & passenger of motorcycle and moped

Table D : Prior to Gazette in Year 2012
Gazette Date : 2012
Enforcement Date : 1 January 2015 (Enforced through VTA Application only)No.

UN Regulation

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.

R4
R10
R11
R19
R21
R23
R26
R34
R37
R38
R44
R45
R55
R60
R61
R64
R77
R89
R91
R101
R117
R119
R121

Description
Rear Registration Plate Lamp
Radio Interference Suppression
Door Latches and Hinges
Front Fog Lamps
Interior Fittings
Reversing Lamps
External Projection
Prevention of Fire Risks
Filament Lamps
Rear Fog Lamps
Child Restraint
Headlamp Cleaners
Mechanical Coupling
Driver Operated Control (Motorcycle)
External Projection
Temporary Spare Tyres
Parking Lamps
Speed Limitation Device
Side-marker Lamps
Emission of Carbon Dioxide and Fuel Consumption (Passenger Car)
Tyres with regard to rolling sound emission
Cornering Lamp
Hand Controls, tell-tales and indications

Th 3rd PublicThe
P bli & Private
P i t Joint
J i t ForumF
ini AsianA i Region
R i-The 17th JASIC ASIA Government/Industry Meeting-

Prepared by:
Department of Transport
Ministry of Public Works and Transport, Laos.
5th December 2012
@ Crowne Plaza Hotel
Manila, Philippines.

1

Content
1. Organization Chart
2. Legislation
3 Implementation
3.
I l
i off Vehicle
V hi l Safety
S f
and
dQ
QualityliControl
4. Problems/challenges
5. Future directions2

1. Organization Chart
Personal Div.

Cabinet OfficeLand Transport Div
Div.

Department off
D
Personal

Motor Vehicle &Machinery Div.

Department ofTransport
Department of
Waterway
Departmentpof
Inspection
Department ofAviation

Planning andBudgeting Div.

Do
oT*

MPW
WT

Department ofRoad

Traffic safety andDriving License Div.
Transport Techniqueand Environment Div.
National Transport
Committee/NTC Office

Department ofPlanning

Heavy Transport
Control Div.
NRSC Secretariat
OfficePublic Work andTransport Institute3*Term of Reference
The main dutyy of Departmentpof Transport
p is:‐ To manage, improve and expand the system of landtransport;‐ To set up the transport and logistics strategy plan
plan;
‐ To set up legislations such as vehicle safety standards,
vehicle registrations and so on;‐ To issue driving licenses including Lao international license.
4

2. Legislation
 Existing Laws/Regulations• Road Traffic Law No 02/NA, Date 8 Apr 2000 (updating)• Land Transport Law No 03‐97/NA, Date 12 Apr 1997 (updating)• Regulation No 4312/MCTPC, Dated 11 Nov 2002
• Regulation No 829/MCTPC
829/MCTPC, Dated 15 Mar 2000
• Prime Ministerial Decision No 78/PM, Dated 03 Jul 20125

3. Implementation of Vehicle Standard and Quality
Control Responsibility Body
1. Ministry of Industry and Commerce (Import-Export Dept.)
2. Ministry of Public Works and Transport (Transport Dept.)
3. Ministry of Finance (Custom Dept.) Regulation No 4312/MCTPC, date 11 Nov 2002
(left hand side and manufacturing certificate).

• New vehicle: Based on
manufacturing or dealers.

thecertificationof• Used Vehicle: Heavy Machinery and Equipment(Prime Ministerial Decision No 78/PM,
78/PM Date 03 July 2012)

6

Parts/Components

Whole Vehicle

7

Comparison of UNECE and Laos on Vehicle
CategoryLaos

8

Vehicle
Importation
Procedures Regulation No 829/MCTPC,
Dated 15 Mar 2000

Vehicle Import Permission from
MOIC

Technical Certificate from DOT,
MPWT

Pay tax at Border Warehouse(Thanaleng)

Vehicle Inspection, Documentation etc at Vehicle and Driving LicenseManagement Unit, DOT, MPWT

Vehiclehi l License
i
Plate
l
and
d
Registration Issuing

9

Problems/Challenges
1 Inadequate specific law and regulation
1.
concerning to vehicle standard in order tocontrol the vehicle assemble factory acrosscountry
2. Lack of knowledge and experiences on how tocreate Vehicle Type Approval System
3. Lack of human resources in particularly
mechanical engineer and specialist due to field10

Future Directions
1. Developing and Improving laws and regulations
e g Road Traffic Law
e.g.
Law, Decree on Motor Vehicle
Standard
2. Classify vehicle category in the way of UN regulation
3. Develop vehicle registration and new license plate(ASEAN/GMS)
4. Modern vehicle management (ITS)
5. Cooperation with ASEAN countries in order to createandad develop
de e op vehicle
e cesstandard
a da d in thee country
cou y

Kob ChaiThank you11

Soe Win
Chief Engineer
Road Transport Administration Department
Ministry of Rail Transportation

Responsible Bodies for Vehicle Type Approval System
Improvement in Myanmar• Road Transportp Administration Departmentp((RTAD))
under Ministry of Rail Transportation• Myanmar Automobile and Diesel-engine Industry(MADI) under Ministry of Industry• Industrial Development Committee (IDC)Vehicle Type Approval System in Myanmar
Vehicles produced andapproved by Myanmar
Automobile & Diesel
E
Enginei IIndustry
d t (MADI)

Vehicles

Vehicles produced by
Local Industrial Zones andapproved by MADI

Inspected
by
p
y the
MADI
&
Road Transport
Ad i i t ti
Administration
Department(RTAD)All Vehicles
must beregisteredat
RTAD

Inspected by Road
Transport
Administration
Department(RTAD)

Imported Vehicles

Total Registered Vehicles in Myanmar
as off S
Septembert b 2012
29448

35786
30595

679

263897

40055

19578

16902

Passenger car
Truck (Light duty)
Truck (Heavy duty)
Bus
Other (Ambulance, Mixer, ect....)
Two Wheelers
Three Wheelers
Trawlergi
Machinery2762544

Vehicles Trend in Myanmaryfrom 2001 to 2012,, Septemberp3500000
3000000
2500000
2000000
1500000
1000000
500000

2012
2

2011
2

2010
2

2009
2

2008
2

2007
2

2006
2

2005
2

2004
2

2003
2

2002
2

2001
2

2000
2

0

Registered Vehicle

VEHICLE Inspection
Inspect the construction of vehicle applying 1993 Testers’ Manual.

Testing System

Tested by MachineoWeight TestingWeight BridgeoExhaust Emission TestinggExhaust Emission TesteroBrake TestingBrake Tester

oHead Lamp TestingHead Lamp TesteroSoundd LeveloSou
eve Testinges go se Testeres eNoiseoSide Slip TestingSide Slip Tester

oSpeedometer TestingSpeedometer Tester

oUnder Body TestingMotor Vehicle Inspection Testing Lane

Current Situation
 Myanmar has some barriers for setting a schedule for the
ECE items.
 We are still observing and not ready to adopt ECE items.
 We refer and apply 1958 Agreement and its amendments inour domestic vehicle industry.
 To accede the WP 29 Agreements, it is still needed to
improve manpower, infrastructure, technology, rules andregulations in vehicle manufacturing procedures.
procedures

Current Situation (contd)(cont’d) Currently,
Currently Myanmar cannot produce a great number of vehicles
and a little number of vehicle are manufactured for the purpose ofdomestic use only.
 In producing vehicles,
vehicles the domestic industries import parts andcomponents made from Japan and Europe, the countries which are
already accepted and applied the UN/ECE regulations.
 We
W havehalso
l acceptedt d theth vehicles
hi l thatth t havehb
been
constructedt t d iniline with UNECE Regulations and Japanese Safety Regulations
because the majority of the imported vehicles are from Japan.

Cooperation to adopt WP 29 Activities
1958 & 1998 Agreement Myanmar
M anmar has been participating as an observer
obser er in JASIC Asia
Government/Industry Meeting. At present, we apply and refersome of UNECE Regulations in domestic type approval system.
 Myanmar has been participating and attending the Meetings of
ACCSQ-APWG
ACCSQ
APWG, and at these occasions,occasions we inform our current
situations and discuss to harmonize with VTA in our country.
 Through the above-mentioned meetings, we can observe theexperiencesi
off otherth countries.
ti

pp WP 29 Activities
Cooperation
to adopt
1958 & 1998 Agreement (cont’d) We keep on cooperating with ASEAN and Japan forInternational Whole Vehicle Type Approval System.
 In the early 2013, 14thh AMEICC – WG – AI will be hold in
Myanmar.
MyanmarConclusion
 At present, Myanmar produces only a small number ofvehicles.
 To accede the 1958 and 1998 Agreements, it needs topromote our existing manpower,
manpower infrastructure andfinancial situation.
 But we try our best to participate in WP 29 Activities.

Th k allThanksll off Y
You!!

C TYPE APPROVALOS SVEHICLESYSTEMIN MALAYSIA (COUNTRY REPORT)AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING DIVISIONROAD TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT OF MALAYSIA
1

CONTENTS
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)

MOT & JPJ Structure
Definition
Legal References
Government Policy
Accession to WP29
VTA Certification System
National Regulation (Example)
Conclusion
2

MOT STRUCTURE
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTLAND TRANSPORTAVIATIONMARITIME

Road Transport
Department

To create and administer a registration and licensing
system forf allll types off motor vehicles
hi l whichhi h isi effective,
ff isafe and full of integrity.

Road Safety
Department

To create and administer an effective training,training testing andlicensing system in order to produce skilled, disciplined andconsiderate drivers.

Malaysia InstituteResearch of Road
SafetyTo enforce and administer traffic laws in order to produce
road users with a culture of compliance with road laws andregulations.
To provide efficient technical advisory service to meet theneeds of the road transport industry.
3

ACCESSION TO WP29

World Forum for Harmonizationof Vehicle Regulationsg(UN/ECE/WP29)

1998
GTR

Agreements
g

1958
ECE
Output

1997
R l
Rule

MALAYSIA ALREADY ACCEDED TO WP29 SINCE 4th April 2006
4

DEFINITION OF VTA
Vehicle Type Approval (VTA) is a homologation process to confirm
the production sample of a vehicle design to comply with specified/ gbefore a vehicle registrationgis allowed instandards/regulations
Malaysia.
VEHICLE TYPE APPROVAL = COMPONENT TYPE APPROVAL + GENERAL REQUIREMENTS*Component Type Approval is product compliance (including
system approval) with specified standards/regulations (MalaysianStandards / UN Regulations
Regulations.
*General Requirements are the requirements listed under Road
Transport Act 1987 and Road Transport Rules .
5

LEGAL REFERENCES RELATED TO VTAThe VTA process is introduced based on the legal references as below:
1 Road Transport Act 1987 (Sect.
1.Road(Sect 10,12
10 12 and 66(1)(pp))
2.Road Transport Rules (Construction & Use Rules)
3.Environmental Quality Act 1974 (Department of Environment)
4 Weight Restriction Order 1989 (Amendment 2009) (Public Work
4.Weight
Department)

6

( )GOVERNMENT POLICIES RELATED TO VTA (1)NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE POLICY : 28TH OCT 2009 TECHNOLOGY : PROMOTING HIGH VALUE AND GREEN TECHNOLOGY‐ Incentivesiffor criticali i l andd highhi h value‐addedl
dd d parts andd greentechnologies‐ Promote Hybrid And Electric Vehicles
 STANDARDS : EFFORTS FOR INCREASED SAFETY‐ Full implementation of VTA by JPJ‐ Gradual Introduction And enforcement of mandatory standards‐ Gradual phase out of imported used parts‐ Gradual phase out of used commercial vehicles‐ Clear Roadmap of implementation of fuel standard‐ Gradual introduction of vehicle end of life policy
7( )GOVERNMENT POLICIES RELATED TO VTA (2)GREEN TECHNOLOGY POLICY : 24TH JULY 2009
 CRITERIA OF GREEN TECHNOLOGYo Minimizes degradation to the environment;o

Has Zero or low Green House Gas ((GHG)) emission;;oSafe for use and promotes healthy and improved environment for all forms of life ;oConserves the use of energy and natural resources; andoPromotes the use of renewable resources

8

COMMITTEE STRUCTURE IN MALAYSIA

WP29
VTA
6 GRs
GRE

GRRF

JPJ

SIRIM

GRSG

GRSP
MIROS

GRE : Lighting & Signalling (39 ECE)
GRRF : Brakes & Running Gear (18 ECE)GRSG : General Safetyy (30( ECE))

GRB

GRPE
DOE

GRSP : Passive Safety (16 ECE)
GRB : Noise (8 ECE)
GRPE : Pollution & Energygy (16( ECE))9

RESPONSIBILITY FOR EACH COMMITTEE
I.

WP29
VTA
6 GRs

To approve the proposed implementation
schedule by VTA committee;
II. To decide policies related to Automotive
Regulations ;III.
III Government and Private Agencies (Association)

II.
II.

TTo approve thli ti ;
the VTA application
To discuss the proposed implementation
schedule by 6 GRs;
III To propose policies related to VTA;III.
IV. Government Agencies onlyI.
II.

To study and propose the implementation
schedule in Malaysia. ;g((Individual&
Government and Private Agencies
Association)
10

JPJ AS AA AND SIRIM AS 1ST TS IN M’SIA
ECE/TRANS/WP.29/343/rev.20

JPJ can give E‐mark for All UN Regulations ;SIRIM can issue official UN Regulations 22 : Safety Helmet

11

VTA COMMITTEE STRUCTURE IN MALAYSIA
Chairman: Director General of JPJ
Co‐Chairman : Director of Automotive Engineering Division JPJ
Secretary: Head of VTA Unit , Automotive Engineering Division JPJ
Members :I.
Ministry of Transport(MOT)II.
Ministry of International Trade and Industry(MITI)
III
III.
Ministry of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs (KPDNKK)
IV. Ministry of Science, Technology and Industry(MOSTI)
V.
Department of Standards Malaysia (DSM)
VI. Department
D
off Environment(DOE)
E i
(DOE)
VII. Royal Custom of Malaysia(KDRM)
VIII. Malaysia Institute Research of Road Safety(MIROS)
IX. SIRIMX.
PUSPAKOM
XI. Malaysian Automotive Institute (MAI)
12

VTA CERTIFICATION SYSTEM IN MALAYSIAJPJ Inspection

Manufacturer

i.i
ii.
iii.

Application

Document Verification
Physical Inspection
Dynamic Test (Road Worthiness
Test)

A package of standards /Rules/Act
Listed in VTA Application form
Compliance of UN Regulations or
M l i Standards
Malaysian
St d dJPJ + VTA Committee
i.
ii
ii.

ISSUE
CERTIFICATE

Mi : 20 Working
Min
W ki
Days
D

iii.
iv.
v.

Compilation and presentation ofInspection Results by JPJ ;Compliance and specification
verification by members ;Determination of vehicle bodyg;configuration
Matter arise related to VTA
application ;Approve the VTA application(2/3/ majority)
13

VEHICLE CATEGORIESL

Motoro o cyc
cycle
e

M1

Passengerg vehicle

M2,M3
,

Bus

N1

Light duty truck

N2, N3Heavy duty truckO

Trailer14

UN REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
2010

R15

2011

R100

2012

2015

R24

R30

R49

R54

R66

R97

R108

R109

R116

R3

R6

R7

R13

R13H

R14

R16

R17

R18

R25

R28

R36

R39

R40

R41

R43

R46

R48*

R50

R51

R52

R53

R58

R62

R69

R70

R73

R75

R78

R79

R80

R81

R83

R90

R93

R94

R95

R98

R99

R104

R112

R113

R22

R4

R10

R11

R19

R21

R23

R26

R34

R37

R38

R44

R45

R48

R55

R60

R61

R64

R77

R89

R91

R101

R117

R119

R121

*R48 (2012) : High Intensity Discharge (HID) Lights only

15

CONCLUSION
1)

All vehicle must undergo the VTA process before
registration is allowed;

2)

VTA process consist of component type approval andgeneral requirements compliance;

3)

VTA is subject to committee approval (require 20
working days);

4)

Until 2012, there are 54 UN Regulations alreadyi limplementedt d iin M
Malaysia
l i andd willill implementi ltanother 24 UN Regulations in year 2015.
16

THANK YOU

17

THAILAND COUNTRY REPORTON
DEVELOPING VTA

Automotive Engineering Bureau
Department of Land Transport
December 2012

Vehicle Type Approval System
 New draft Act of Land Transport,
p , which authorisefor vehicle type approval system, still jointly
considered by DLT and the Council of State Under Motor Vehicle Act,, MR2551 enforced in June2009 which empower DLT to issue notification ofvehicle Parts/Systems in line with UN regulations

Introducing UN Regulations
 Implementation plan of UN regulations for M1
M1/N
/N1
1

&L3 is finalised in May 2012 by taking into account&L3
on 19 UN regulations annexed ASEAN MRA anddiscussing
g with the stakeholders First Notification in line with UN regulation : R41
R41

enforced since 2012 and the others are consideredbyy Legalg Division before notification issuance andimplementation

Adopting UN Regulations
 Present system allow UN regulations as theequivalent and accept only UN test report Working group for considering WP.29
WP.
WP 29 activities isrevised and will for instance,> set criteria for adopting UN regulations as the firsttask> set up a plan of adopting UN regulations in WP.29
WP.29
meeting as the second task
< Thank you>

Introduction of
Vehicle Safety Type Approvalin Taiwan

5 Dec
Dec. 2012

Vehicle Safety Type Approval System（1）Regulation Structure
Law
The Highway Law (Paragraph 5, Article 63)

Management Regulation
Vehicle Safety Type Approval Management Regulations
41 articles and 3 attachments
Effective from 29 January 2007

Technical Regulation
Vehicle Safetyy Testingg Directions
65 required testing regulations
Effective from 31 January 20072

Vehicle Safety Type Approval System（2）The development and update of motorcycle/moped safety regulations


1998- Introduce Vehicle Safety Type Approval System to Taiwan

2002 New type of motorcycle/moped under 250 cc to conduct
2002Vehicle Safety Type Approval
2003- All of type motorcycle/moped to conduct Vehicle Safety TypeApproval
2006- Stage 1 technical regulations in Taiwan harmonized with ECE
regulationsg
implementedp2007- Stage 2 technical regulations in Taiwan harmonized with ECE
regulations implemented- Introducing relevant regulations for small
small-light
light moped
2009- Stage 3 technical regulations in Taiwan harmonized with ECE
regulations implemented
2010 To cope with the development of electric motorcycle/moped,
2010motorcycle/moped
introduce relevant safety regulations for electricmotorcycle/moped .








3

Vehicle Safety Type Approval System（3）Structure of“Vehicle
Vehicle Safety Type Approval Management Regulations
Regulations“

Chapter 1 General Regulations
 Definitions



Chapter 2 Motor vehicle safety type approval Qualifications, documents, procedures and so onChapterp 3 Accreditation of Technical Services
 Qualifications, documents, procedures and so on

Chapter 4 Verification, Supervision and of administration
Chapter 5 Supplementary provisions
Attachment 1 to 3
According to Article 3 : The vehicles shall apply for the tests conducted byt h i l services
technicalior certification
tifi ti iinstitution
tit titot acquirei testt t reports
t accordingdito the Vehicle Safety Testing Directions. Then proceed with the application
toward Certification Institution and acquire the Vehicle Safety Type Approval
Certificate and then apply for registration,
registration inspection and get the new license
plate from the Motor Vehicle Office.
4

Vehicle Safety Type Approval System（4）Difference between WVTA and LVSALVSA (Low Volume Safety Approval)

WVTA (Mass Volume)

Qualification

the vehicle importer

the authorized
vehicleimporter

Vehicle amount of eachapplication case<= 20
All vehicles shall be of the same
type and specifications shall beidentical.

No limit

Testing items

Some testing items can be
exempted
exempted.

All

Report

Test report or
Examination report

Examination report

COP

Not required

Required when applying for
examination report.

On-site surveillance checkf vehicleforhi l quantity
tit andd
specification

R
Requiredi d

N t required
Not
i d

5

Vehicle Safety Type Approval System（5）Certificate Issuing Procedures (WVTA)
ApplicantTo Technical Service-- Test

Applicattion
Technical Docs

Syste
em/Compon
nentEx
xamination
n

Tests

ApplicantSystem/Component
Examination
1.Technical Docs
2.Test Report
3.COP PlanTo Certification Institute – Approval
Applicaation

ApprovallCollecting All
Examination
Reports

Sys./Comp.
Test Report

To Certification Institution –Examination

Vehicle Approval
1.Technical Doc.
2 All Examination
2.All
Reports

Approval
ReportSystem/Comp.
Examination
ReportApproval Authority

Issuing
Certificate

6Vehicle Safety Type Approval System（6）From October 1998, vehicle safety type approval system was brought
into force,
force the large vehicle firstly have to meet this system,
system andgradually expand its category symbols and testing regulations year by
year, in 2004, all of category symbols were included.
I matchingInt hi with
ith APEC Action
A ti Plan,
Pl
f
from
2006 Vehicle
2006,
V hi l Safety
S f t Testing
T ti
Direction harmonize with ECE regulation by category symbols and stage,
and currently there are 48 ECE regulations were announced andimplemented in Taiwan.
Tai anThe basic dimensions of vehicle by paper
examination that focus on vehicle registration
information and driver of management
Refer to foreign examination system, each category
symbols are gradually including with Vehicle Safety
T
TypeA
Approvall Management
M
R
Regulations
l i
separatelyl1998.10

In following wiht APEC Action Plan,
Testing Direction harmonize with ECE
regulation

2006.7

7

Vehicle Safety Type Approval System（7）A
ApprovallA
Authority
h i
Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC)

Certification Institution
Authorized by MOTC
Technical Services
Accredited by MOTC

46 Technical Services (109 witnessed laboratory)
Domestic institutions:1.Automotive Research & Testing Center2 Taiwan Rubber Research & Testing Center
2.Taiwan
3.Hi Safe Technologies Co., Ltd.
4.KINGDOM Vehicle Inspection co.
…
Foreign institutions:
1.ATLAS Material Testing Technology GmbH (Germany)
2.AIB-Vinçotte International n.v. (Belgium)
3.KEMA Quality B.V. (The Netherlands)
4.Lichttechnisches Institut der Universität Karlsruhe (Germany)
Nordrhein-Westfalen ((MPA NRW)) (Germany)
5.Materialpruefungsamt
p
g
(
y)
…
For detail information, please refer VSCC website

8

Introduction of
Vehicle Safety Testing Directions

9

Vehicle Safety Testing Regulation（1/7）


Taiwan has scheduled a plan to implement 66 ECE Regulations in 3 stages:
stage 1（2006）
1（2006）,stagestage 2（2007~2008）and2（2007 2008）and stage 3（2009~2012）
3（2009 2012）.
 However, 18 among those scheduled regulations were postponed.
 So currently, 48 among those scheduled regulaitons were announced.
 3 more regulations were added（ECE R100, 107 and 123） by MOTC
afterwards.
Up
p to now,, Taiwan has alreadyy implementedpand/or announced 51 ECERegulations.
Announced Reg. by MOTC
but not yet effective: 3

Postponed Reg. by
MOTC: 18

Announced & effectiveReg. by MOTC: 48
10

Vehicle Safety Testing Regulation（2/7）
Announced & effective Reg. by MOTC: 48 （1/2）
Effective Reg.

Effective Reg.
ECE

Title

ECE

Title

3

Retro reflecting devices
Retro-reflecting

23

Reversing Lamps

5

Sealed beam headlamps

25

Head Restraints

6

Direction indicators

28

Audible Warning Devices

7

Front and Rear Position Lamps, Stop lamps
and End-Outline Marker Lamps

30

Pneumatici Tiresi

31

Halogen Sealed Beam Headlamps

10

EMC

36

Construction of Public Service Vehicles

11

Door Latches & Hinges

37

Bulbs

12

Steering Mechanism

38

Rear Fog Lamps

13

Braking

39

Speedometer

13H

Braking

43

Safety Glazing Materials

14

Safety-Belt Anchorage46

Rear-Vies Mirrors

16y Belts
Safety48

gInstallation of Lights

17

Seats

50

Lights (Moped, Motorcycle)

19

Front Fog Lamps

11

Vehicle Safety Testing Regulation（3/7）
Announced & effective Reg. by MOTC: 48 （2/2）
Effective Reg.

Effective Reg.

ECE

Title

ECE

Title

52

Construction of small Capacity
p yPublic Service Vehicles

91

Side-Marker
Side
Marker Lamps

94

Frontal collision protection

53

Installation of Lights (Motorcycle)

95

Side collision Protection

54

Pneumatic Tires (commercial vehicle)

98

G Di h
Gas-Discharge
H
Headlampsdl

55

Mechanical Coupling99

Gas-Discharge Light Sources

60

Driver Operated Controls

66

Strength of Super Structure

104

Retro-Reflective Markings for heavy and long
V hi lVehicles74

Installation of light （moped）

107

77

Parking Lamps

M2 or M3 Vehicles with Regard to Their
General Construction

78

Braking (Category L)

112

Headlamps （with a Asymmetrical Passing
Beam

79

Steering Equipment

80

Seats of Large Passenger Vehicle

113

Headlamps （with a Symmetrical Passing
Beam）

81

Rear-View Mirrors（Moped）

123

AFS

12

Vehicle Safety Testing Regulation（4/7）
Announced Reg. by MOTC but not yet effective: 3

Announced Reg. by MOTC but not yet effective:3
ECE

Title

75

P
Pneumaticti TiresTi （moped,（
d motorcycle）
t
l ）

100

Electric Power Train

34

Tank

13

Vehicle Safety Testing Regulation（5/7）
ECE forM2/M3/N2/N3/O3/O4
2004

R36, 52

2

2006

R3, 6, 7, 16, 19, 23, 28,
30, 37, 43, 48, 54, 77,
91 98,
91,
98 99,
99 10417

ECE for M1/N1/O1/O2

R5, 13, 14, 17, 25, 31,
38, 39, 66, 79, 80, 112,
113

13

R3, 6, 7, 16, 19, 23, 28, 30,
37, 39, 43, 54, 77, 91, 98,
99 10499,

17

R5, 11, 12, 13, 13h, 14, 17,25, 31, 38, 48, 79, 94, 95,
112, 113

R46 10,R46,
10 123,
123 55,55 34

5R46 10,R46,
10 123,
123 34

4

2013
2014

R100

1

R100

R39, 53, 60, 74, 81,
98, 997

22

R19, 28, 78

3

3

16

2009
2011

Total
2

2007
2008

ECE for L1/L3

17

R3, 37, 50, 112, 113,
38

6

1

R10
R10,

1

5

R75

1

1

1

1

37Announ

37Annou17

ced
1 Drafted

nced
1 Drafted

Announced
1 Drafted

50/
1

14

Vehicle Safety Testing Regulation（6/7）
New Technical Regulations Using ECE as a basis
Drafted in 2012

Scope and proposed date of implementation
ECE

Title of Item

107

Specification of
open-top singledecker and double
doubledecker buses

g vehicle
Large

Small vehicle

Motorcycley

To bedetermined

---

---

Status

Prepared for MOTC discussion

1. Announced Reg. by MOTC but not yet
effective
2.Metallic and plastic fuel tank shall comply
with hydraulic test and overturn test, for M
and N.

34

Fuel Tank

2014/1/1

2014/1/1---

64

Tyre pressure
monitoring system(TPMS)---

To be
determined---

Under discussion

RE3

Acoustic vehicle
alerting system

To bedetermined

To bedetermined

To bedetermined

Under discussion

15

Vehicle Safety Testing Regulation（7/7）
New Technical Regulations for Taiwan only
Drafted in 2012

Scope and proposed date of implementation
ECE

Title of Item---

Forward collision
warning system（FCWS）---

Driving visionassist system

Statusg vehicle
Large

Small vehicle

Motorcycley

To bedetermined

---

---

Under discussion

---

---

Under discussion

To bedetermined16Thank you for your attention

17

Large passenger vehicle without a roof
Background: To introduce large passenger vehicle
without a roof （single-decker（single decker and double-decker
double decker
buses）into Taiwan for sightseeing.
Objective: To carry passengers for sightseeing at
Objective:rote.
specific route.
route
Scope:: This Regulation applies to M2 and M3.
Scope
Testing Criteria : The body specifications of vehicle
refer to ECE R107 Annex 3 and EEC 2002/7/EC .

18

Tank
Background: According to MOTC’s schedule toimplement ECE R34.
R34
Objective: To improve the structure of fuel tank for
Objective:
vehicle safety
Scope: This Regulation applies to categories M andScope:
N.
Testing Criteria : Metallic and plastic fuel tank shallcomply with hydraulic test and overturn test and soforth of safety regulation
regulation..

19

Tyre pressure monitoring system (TPMS)
Background: Due to flat tire could cause car
accident.
accident
Objective: To monitor the pressure of tires for
Objective:
vehicle safety.
Scope:: This Regulation applies to M1, N1.
Scope
Testing Criteria : Tyre pressure monitoring systemof M1and N1 refer to ECE R64 Temporary
Temporary-use
use spare
wheels/tyres and run flat tires

20

Acoustic Vehicle Alerting System（AVAS）
Background:. Due to pedestrians and vulnerable
road users might be hit by soundless electric vehicle
vehicle..
Objective: To inform pedestrians and vulnerable
Objective:
road users that electric vehicle is coming for vehicle
safet
safety.
safety.
Scope: This Regulation applies to electric vehicle of
Scope:
L, M and N.
Testing Criteria :TheThe regulation of AVAS refer to
ECE RE3RE3 Annex 2 and GTR QREV and so on
on..

21

Forward collision warning system（FCWS）
Background: To reduce the rate of vehicle collision.
Objective: Monitoring the roadway in front of the host
Objective:
vehicle and warn the driver when a potential collision risk
exists..
existsScope:: This Regulation applies to M2 and M3.
Scope
Testing Criteria : Forward collision warning system refer
to ISO 15623 and NHTSA Technical Report DOT HS 808
964 August 1999 Table 3 and so on
on..

Speed
(km/h)

C lli iCollision
warning
distance

60

20 m

70

23 m

80

26 m

90

30 m

100

33 m

22

Driving vision assist system
Background:. Due to driving vision around vehicle isinsufficient for large vehicle.
vehicleObjective: To provide extra driving vision around vehicle
Objective:for driver to reduce the rate of car accident.
accident.
Scope:: This Regulation applies to M2 and M3.
Scope
Testing Criteria :Cameras
Cameras shall be install on both side ofvehicle and the installed area, in
in--vehicle display monitor
were also required.
required.

23

Panel Discussion:
Part IIASEAN 19 items and the examinationof the optimally unified vehicle typeapproval system in ASEAN region

Coordinator: Mr. Shigeo Yoshizawa (Japan)
Panelists:
Japan, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia,
Vietnam, Philippines, Singapore

Certification under the 1958 Agreement
The 3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian Region
4-5 December 2012

Takao ONODA
Director,
ecto , International
te at o a Affairs
a sO
Office,ce,Engineering Policy Division,
Road Transport Bureau
1

ASEAN – Japan Transport Partnership

Proceedings of Type Designation for Devices in Japan
Technical
T h i l SServiceiApplicantMinistry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism JAPAN

Government

Submit(Original)

Manufacturer/ Importer

Application forms(Copy)
Order testing

providePresentation ofsamplel ddevicesi(National Traffic Safety
and Environment Laboratory)

Send Test
ReportReceiving of certification

Send Certificate
Mutual recognition under the 1958 agreement

Examination of submitted
documents

E43
Device typeyp designationgin JapanpType designated items applicableto the UN Regulations

Contractingg Partyy of the Agreementg
The device type designation shall be accepted as having acquired
the device type designation of the Contracting Party
2

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism JAPANASEAN – Japanof
Transport
Partnership
Mutual Recognition
Approval(MRA) under the 1958 Agreement

UN-ECE
Regulations
UN Regulation

MRA
Vehicle/Parts
Manufacturers
AApplication
Application
li ti
ECEXX
XX
- -ECEECE
YY- ECE YY

Technical
R
RequirementsitCompliance of the requirement
for Vehicle systems/Parts

Applying
and
Test
A l i
Applying

Certificate
Certificate
ECEXX
XX- -ECEECE
YY- ECE YY

58 agreement members
A Country

Test

Issue

B CountryC
C Country

S b itSubmitD Country
Adopted of ECE XX,“TestedTestedOnce,
OnceOnce
Accepted
Everywhere
Everywhere”
and“Certified
Certified
Once,
Accepted
Everywhere”
Everywhere
ECE YY R
Regulations
l ti
Harmonization of Technical Regulations by UN-ECE Reg.

Possible to simplify certification procedure among thecontracting countries

Japan Transport Partnership
ComparingASEAN
of Test– Report
and Certification under the 1958 Agreement

Test Report

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism JAPAN

Certificate under the 1958
Agreement

Issuing institution

Technical Service

Government

Validity

Only tested device

Devices comply with UN Regulation

Conformity Of Production

Not verified

Verified by an Approval Authority－

The Contracting Party which issued theapproval shall take the necessary steps tobring the products into conformity withthe approved types and shall advise theother Contracting Parties applying theRegulation through type approval of thesteps it has taken, which may include, if
necessary, the withdrawal of approval.

－

Any dispute which is not settled bynegotiation shall be submitted toarbitration if any one of the Contracting
Parties in dispute so requests and shall bereferredfd accordingly
di l tot one or more
arbitrators selected by agreement
between the Parties in dispute.

In case of finding thatcertaint i devicesd iddo nott
conform to the approved
types

Dispute

4

ASEAN – Japan Transport Partnership

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism JAPANThank you for your attention!

MLIT

S
COG
O
ASEAN
MUTUAL RECOGNITIONARRANGEMENT (MRA)(PANEL DISCUSSION 2)
AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING DIVISIONROAD TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT OF MALAYSIA
1

OUTLINE
1)
2)

ASEAN Consultative Committee onStandards and Qualityy ((ACCSQ))
Automotive Product Working Group(A ti ities and update)(Activities
pdate)

2

Q TOWARDS AEC – STANDARDS ((1))
ACCSQ
Harmonization of Standards on priority sectors
Agro‐basedg
products (pp(preparedpfoodstuff))
Healthcare products (Cosmetics, Medical Device,
Pharmaceutical)
Rubber‐based
Electricalll andd ElectroniclTraditional Medicine and Health Supplementpp
Wood based products
Automotive
3

Q TOWARDS AEC – STANDARDS ((2))
ACCSQ
Implementation of MRAs
ASEAN Framework Agreement on MRAs (1998)
ASEAN Sectoral MRA for Electrical and Electronic Equipment (2002)
ASEAN MRA of Product Registration Approval for Cosmetics (2003)((MRA
iis Schedule
S h d l A off theh ASEANS
Harmonizedi dC
Cosmetics
i Regulatoryl
Scheme)ASEAN Sectoral MRA for GMP Inspection of Manufacturers for
Medicinal Products (2009)
MRAs under Development
ASEAN MRA on Type Approval for Automotive Product.
4

Q TOWARDS AEC – STANDARDS ((3))
ACCSQ

5

AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCT WORKING GROUP
APWG is created to eliminate TBT and facilitate
trade in the Automotive sector.
Elimination of Technical Barriers to Tradegthrough:harmonization of standards, technicalrequirements and regulations
regulations.
Recognition of Conformity Assessment Results
throughhh Mutuall Recognition Arrangements (MRA)()
Common regulatorygy regimeg((Regulations,gprocedures)
6

AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCT WORKING GROUP
1.
1 Harmonization of standards based on UN regulations.
regulations
19 UN regulations for immediate harmonisation
Define technical requirementsqof the regulations
g
Identify series of UN regulations
2. Harmonization of Motor Vehicle classification
Identify UN classification and definition on power driven vehicles
and trailers.
trailers (M1(M1, N1 and L)
Cross referencing with national laws
3. Fuel properties and emission regulations, certification
procedures and safetyy regulationspg
Initial activity has commenced in this area
7

LIST OF 19 UN REGULATIONS (UP TO DATE)No.

Automotive Product

UNECE
Regulation

UNECE Series

1Braking System

R13

11

2

Braking System (Passenger Car)

R13H

00

3

Seat belt anchorage

R14

06

4

S t belt
Seat
b lt

R16

06

5

Seats

R17

07

6

Head Restraints

R25

04

7

Pneumatic tyre – passenger

R30

02

8

Speedometer

R39

00

9

Exhaust Emission (L category)

R40

01

10

Noise emission (L category)

R41

03

11

Safety glass

R43

00*
00

12

Rear View Mirror

R46

02

13

Exhaust Emission

R49

05

14

Noise emission

R51

02

15

P
Pneumatic
ti tyret– commercial
i l

R54

00

16

Driver Operated Control (L Category)

R60

01

17

Tyre (L category)

R75

00

18

Steering Equipment

R79

01

19

Exhaust Emission

R83

05

8

CHALLENGES
1.
1 To harmonize unique requirements among
ASEAN Member States for the identified UN
Regulations ;2. To understand in details the technicalrequirements for each regulation ;3 To establish the regional testing facilities ;3.
4. To establish the regional expertise in ASEAN
Government andd Industry.
d
9

THANK YOU

10

Policyy for ASEAN
19
items and optimal VTA
i ASEAN R
in
Regioni

Thailand5th December 2012

Thailand Government Policy on ASEAN MRAThai government supports the establishment of ASEAN MRA inorder to facilitate trade and certification activities among
ASEAN countries in year 2015.



ASEAN MRA scope on products produced and marketed in
ASEAN to support local makers.

Accept the use of technical service and testing facility outside
ASEAN.



Thai government may not enforce all 19 UN Regulations by
2015 but they will accept the “Test Report” of 19 UN
Regulations.

Regulations under ASEAN MRA will be acceptable asalternative to national regulations.

Regulatory body of 19 UN-R
UN R of ASEAN MRA
 TISI : 3 mandatory
y standards
1)

Emission (UN R40, R83 and R49)

2)

Safety Belt (UN R16R16 component only)3)

Safety Glass (UN R43- component only) DLT : Plan
Pl tot enforcef
theth restt off UN-Regulations;
UN R
l ti
1)

Safety belt (UN R16- Installation only)2)

Safety Glass (UN R43- Installation only)

3)

Others; Brake (UN R13 and R13H), Seatbelt Anchorage (UNR14), Seat (UN R17), Head Restraints (UN R25), Tire (UN R30,
R54 and R75), Speedometer (UN R39), Noise (UN R41 and UN
R51),), Rear view mirror (UN(R46),), Driver operatedpcontrol (UN(R60) and Steering (UN R79)

Policy on 19 UN-R
UN R of ASEAN MRA
1) Thai Government will accept “Test
Test reportreport” or“Certificate with Test Report” of ASEAN MRA
 TISI :

To compare “Test report” under ASEAN MRA with TISI
standard to issue TISI certificate



TIS Mark and COP are required DLT :
To accept “Test report” under ASEAN MRA as alternative of
DLT regulationl ti
andd issuei
DLT certificate
tifi t

No DLT Marking but COP is required

DLT also accept the Test Report from Technical service
under WP29

Policy on 19 UN-R
UN R of ASEAN MRA
2) Acceptance of later/latest version of UN
UN-Regulation
Regulation
under ASEAN MRA
 TISI :

By current law, TISI cannot accept the later/latest version of
UN Regulation.
UN-Regulation

 DLT :
Accept “Test Report” of later/latest version of UN-Regulationas alternative of DLT regulation

3) Considering “Worst case selection” for testing inaccordance with EU practice.


TISI and DLT have no objection

Th k youThankReport-2
JICA Philippine Project

Mr. Arnel R. Manresa
Chief of Road Transport Planning Division,
DOTCReport-3
China and India Forum in 2012,
and their Country Report

China and India

Report-3
Expert Meetings in 2012and plan for 2013

Mr. Hiroshi Morita
Director,
Japan Automobile Standards
Internationalization Center (JASIC)

Public and Private Joint Forum
Report of the 2012 JASICp Meetingsg
Asia Expert
and its plan for 2013~
5 December, 2012

Hiroshi MORITA

JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
http://www.jasic.org

Concept of the Expert meetings
Under the JASIC P/P Forum,,◆To improvep
the understanding
g of the 1958
Agreement and the UN Regulations by the Ａ
sian countries.
◆To strengthen the cooperation among Asian
countries.
tiExpert Meeting
PurposeTo understand UN Regulations and improve the knowledge,
skills, methods also the certification system, COP practically through the wholevehicle approval systems under the 1958 Agreement
Agreement..
Arrange Experts and dispatch them①②
Processto the country to carry out theRequestq
UN-items

History

P/P Forum

2003: 01.
2003
01 Thailand
i
*Lamp
*
2005: 02. Indonesia *1958 Agree.
2005: 03. Thailand *Brake
2006: 04. Philippines *1958 Agree.
2006: 05. Hong Kong *Approval
2006: 06. Thailand *Belt, Seat etc.
2007: 07. Philippines *Admin.
007: 08. Indonesia
do es a *Accession,
ccess o , ECEC
2007:
2007: 09. Vietnam *1958 Agree.
2007: 10. India *Approval, MRA
2007: 11. Indonesia *Noise
2008: 12
12. Thailand *HL
HL, Brake
2008: 13. Indonesia *Glass
2008: 14. Thailand *Noise, OBD
2008: 15. Malaysia *Belt, Seat etc.
2008 16 I di *E i i

Expert MeetingIntercommunication③

2009: 172009
17. Phili
Philippinesi*Approval*Al etc.
t
Each requested country
2009: 18. Philippines *Belt, Tｙre
arrange the venue and2009: 19. Malaysia *MRA, Lamp
collect the audiences
2009: 20. Vietnam *Glass④
2009: 21. Philippines *Noise, Glass
2010: 22. Vietnam *Emission, Tｙre
2010: 23. Malaysia *Brake
2010: 24. Indonesia *Brake
2011: 25. Thailand *Steering
EX Meeting13
2011: 26. China *EMC
2011: 27. Philippines *Tｙre, AWD
2011: 28. Vietnam *HeadHead lamp
2011: 29. Malaysia *Protection of Occupants
2012: 30. Malaysia *EV, Exhaust Emission
2012: 31. Vietnam * Prevention of Fire Risks and Recall
2012: 32 Thailand *Seat Tｙre

Expert meetings in 2012
Organization

Timing30th Malaysia

July

31st

VietnamAugust32nd Thailand

August

Theme
R100 ((Electric Power Train)) ,R40, R83 (Exhaust Emission)
R34 (Prevention of Fire Risks) ,RecallR80 (Seat-Large Passenger
Vehicle) ,R117 (Tyres with regard torolling soundso nd emissions)30thExpert meeting in Malaysia

31st Expert meeting in Vietnam

32nd Expert meeting in Thailand

Trend in 2012
１． Decrease of the number of countries requestingq
g ExpertpMeeting.
Indonesia and Philippines didn’t hold Expert Meeting this year.
Affected by each countries projects(Indonesia , Malaysia, Philippines)?
R41,R51 (Noise) Malaysia planed theme for Expert Meeting were lectured in
M l i project.
Malaysia
j t

2. Increase of the countries requesting for Electric Vehicle.
 Malaysia
i held Expert Meeting
i for
f EV thisi year.
 APWG-WS on EV(R100,R12,R94,R95) was also held in April and September.
 Vietnam and Thailand plan Expert Meetings for EV after 2013.
2013

Future plan for Expert meetings(1)Organization

Timing

Theme

Vietnam

2013

R100(Electric Vehicle)

Malaysia

2013

R58(Rear Underrun Protection),
R73(Lateral Protection)
Protection),
R93(Front Underrun Protection),
R107(Bus general Construction)

Philippines

2013

R39(Speed meter),
R60(Driver Operated Cont)

2013

R30, R54 (Pneumatic tyre),
R39(Speed meter),
R46(Rear View Mirror),
R60(Driver Operated Cont)
R85, R94/R95,R100(EV safety andenvironmental aspects)

ThailandFuture plan for Expert meetings（２）Organization

TimingTheme

Vi t
Vietnam

2014

R
Recyclel andd motorcycletl emission
i iMalaysia

2014

R10(Electromagnetic Compatibility)
R34(Prevention of fire risk)

Thailand2014

Malaysia

2015

Thailand2015

R87 (Daytime Running Lamps)
R123 (AFS)
R21 (Interior Fitting )R26 (External Projection)
R55 (Mechanical(M h i l Coupling)Cli )R12 (Steering Mechanism)
R94 (frontal collision )R95 (lateral collision)

Thank you for your attention

Wrap UpMr. Takao Onoda,
Director, International Affairs Office,Engineering Policy Division,
Road Transport Bureau, Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism(MLIT),Japan

Closing Address

Atty. Alfonso V. Tan, Jr.
Executive Director, LTO, Philippines

MemoMinutes

Evaluation

Attendee Survey
The 3 Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian regionrd- The 17th JASIC ASIA GOVERNMENT/ INDUSTRY MEETING -Dec. 4 - 6, 2012
Thank you for your participating in "the 3rd Public and Private Joint Forum in Asian region"in Indonesia. We would highly appreciate if you take a few minutes to answer the following
questions.
Name:
Organization:

Country (Economy):

1. As for the theme of 6th series of P/P Joint Forum, "Developing infrastructure in eachcountry to realize mutual recognition of Whole Vehicle Type Approvals under UN
Reguration framework with the regulations annexed to the 1958 Agreement”□interesting□not so much of my interests--- Day 1 --2. As for the contents throughout Day 1□easy□adequate□difficult

3. Please evaluate length of time allocated each item.
Speech□too long□enough
Presentation□too long□enough
Panel Discussion-1□too long□enough
Question and Answer□too long□enough□too short□too short□too short□too short

4. Please write any questions and/or comments at this meeting (Day 1), if you have.

1/2

--- Day 2 --1. As for the contents throughout Day 2□easy□enough□difficult

2. Please evaluate length of time allocated each item.
Reports□too long□enough
Presentation□too long□enough
Panel Discussion-2□too long□enough
Question and Answer□too long□enough□too short□too short□too short□too short

3. Please provide any comments and/or questions at this meeting (Day 2), if you have.

---As for the P/P Joint Forum in the future --1. Please provide any additional comments on activity of P/P Joint Forum in the future,
if you have.

2. How to receive” Forum document /file.”?
Which would you prefer?
□Paper(present style)□ Download form JASIC’ Website.
3. Would you like to participate in the next P/P Joint Forum?
□Yes□No
4. For ones who answer No;
What is the reason why you do not want to participate?

5. Other
Please write comments and/or questions concerning this meeting.

Thank you very much for your cooperation.

2/2