Company-X
Office Suite and Editable Document
Format Upgrade Options
Authored by Dave Koelmeyer
Apertura Designs Limited
New Zealand
www.apertura.co.nz
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/.

Adapt this document for your company’s environment:
1. Replace Company-X with your company name.
2. Replace Company-Y with your potential migration partner. The migration partner
should have specific LibreOffice support, training, and migration services expertise. A
migration partner may help strengthen the business case.
3. The example pricing provided is for not-for-profits. Replace this with pricing
appropriate for your context.
4. Delete this notice and provide the necessary attribution under the license terms.

Table of Contents
Overview..............................................................................................................................................3
Key reasons for upgrading....................................................................................................................3
1) Continuity of access to Intellectual Property (IP) and document interchange............................3
2) Security and stability...................................................................................................................33) Efficiency and productivity benefits............................................................................................4
Replacement native file format considerations....................................................................................4
Microsoft OOXML..........................................................................................................................4
OpenDocument Format (ODF)........................................................................................................4
Google Drive native file format.......................................................................................................5
Replacement office software candidates..............................................................................................5
Microsoft Office 2013......................................................................................................................5
Microsoft Office 365........................................................................................................................6
LibreOffice.......................................................................................................................................7
Google Drive....................................................................................................................................9
Recommendations...............................................................................................................................11
Migration plan....................................................................................................................................12
Appendix A: Office productivity suite cost comparisons...................................................................13
Appendix B: File format compatibility and support...........................................................................15
Appendix C: Migration partner..........................................................................................................16

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 2 of 16

Overview
Company-X’s current installed office software is Microsoft Office 2003. While it has served usadequately over the years, there is now a requirement to upgrade.
This document covers:• The reasons for an upgrade• A summary of the competing electronic file formats• A comparison of the replacement software candidates• Recommendations for the replacement file format and software

Key reasons for upgrading
1) Continuity of access to Intellectual Property (IP) and document interchange• Company-X’s IP is stored in older Microsoft Office file formats. Microsoft will eventually
withdraw support for older file formats, leading to Company X no longer having access to its own
IP. Documents saved in these formats are by default inaccessible from recent Microsoft Office
software releases.
• IP stored in older file formats is a long-term archival risk. The risk increases going forward, as
Microsoft continues to release new software without the necessary file format support.
• Document interchange with other agencies is frequently problematic. Microsoft Office 2003
increasingly cannot open newer Microsoft Office-format files.
Alternative office software offers superior compatibility for these older proprietary file formats,more so than Microsoft's own products. There are significant benefits to Company-X adopting a
non-proprietary, industry-standardised file format.
2) Security and stability

Microsoft ceased support for Office 2003 in April 2014. This means:• Company-X is exposed to an increasing IT security risk. Microsoft no longer provides thenecessary security patching to prevent against malware infections contained in Microsoft Officefiles.
• New Microsoft Windows versions will break compatibility with Microsoft Office 2003, leading
to the software behaving in unpredictable and disruptive ways, or ceasing to work altogether.
An office suite upgrade rectifies both problems. Certain alternative office software products provide
additional longer-term benefits.

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 3 of 16

3) Efficiency and productivity benefits• Microsoft Office 2003 is missing features present in modern office software. Examples include
built-in PDF editing and export, a user interface optimised for wide-screen displays, cloud
integration, and features for collaborative working.
Company-X undoubtedly stands to benefit from a replacement office software suite with modern
features and performance.

Replacement native file format considerations
Each proposed replacement office software product features an attendant native file format. The
product's full features and functionality is implemented using this native format. A summary of theavailable competing file formats follows.
Microsoft OOXMLOOXML is the native file format used by current versions of Microsoft Office. Files in OOXML
format have the .docx, .xlsx, and .pptx extensions in the file name. Due to the complexity of theformat’s specification, Microsoft is the only vendor implementing OOXML to any significant
degree. The absence of broad industry support for OOXML engenders the same long-term risk
regarding continuity of access to IP stored in the format.
Additionally, multiple variants of the OOXML format exist across differing Microsoft Officeversions (Office 2007, Office 2010, Office 2013, Office for Macintosh). These variants containproprietary, non-standardised components available only to Microsoft.
Microsoft's claim of industry standardisation – while also delivering multiple overlapping format
versions containing proprietary technology – aligns with their business model of locking incustomers to a single product. This is the precise scenario which Company-X is currently in.
OpenDocument Format (ODF)

ODF is recognised as the leading industry-standard (ISO/IEC) office productivity file format.
ODF's straightforward specification and independence from any single controlling vendor – withoversight from a standards body – has seen it gain significant uptake in enterprise-scaleorganisations worldwide. The UK Government for example has mandated ODF as its sole standard
for document interchange – rejecting Microsoft's OOXML file format outright.1
ODF's open nature has lead to the availability of many competing business office software
alternatives with complete native feature support.. Examples include LibreOffice, and Apache
OpenOffice. This changing competitive landscape has also lead to Microsoft and Google
implementing ODF support in their products.
Files saved in ODF format today are guaranteed to open tomorrow and years into the future,irrespective of product and vendor. This ensures permanent continuity of access to our IP.

1

www.gov.uk/government/news/open-document-formats-selected-to-meet-user-needs

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 4 of 16

Google Drive native file format

Google’s cloud-based Google Drive service uses a proprietary, undocumented native file format.
There is no choice of vendor. This is similar to Company-X's current scenario with Microsoft Officefile formats.

Replacement office software candidates
Four product candidates are proposed. Each product is described below, with key advantages anddisadvantages relative to Company-X's use case. Detailed information is provided in appendices.

Microsoft Office 2013
Microsoft Office 2013 is Microsoft’s current office software product. It’s delivered as a fullinstallation on a computer hard drive, similar to our existing Microsoft Office 2003 installations.

Advantages
Full-featured, comprehensive office software suite

In terms of features, Office 2013 will fulfil Company-X's current office productivity needs. It
contains many modern amenities introduced in the 12 years since Office 2003's release.

Disadvantages
Effectively proprietary native file formats, poor support for legacy file formats

Referring to the Replacement native file format considerations section above, Office 2013 will keep
us locked-in to using Microsoft file formats, with the attendant risks and drawbacks. Microsoft isalso withdrawing support for their older file formats. This leaves Company-X exposed to the risk ofbeing unable to access IP saved in these formats.
Relatively high cost

Although the retail pricing for Microsoft Office is typically hundreds of dollars per license,
discounts are available for not-for-profit organisations. However, as well as the initial license cost,many hidden costs are associated with Microsoft Office products.2
Deeply complex product licensing

Microsoft licensing requires sustained staff effort performing Software Asset Management to ensure
license compliance. Non-compliance gives rise to the risk of a Microsoft license audit and costly
penalties. This complexity is compounded with the adoption of BYOD and remote working
scenarios.
Revised user interface is a substantial, disruptive change

Office 2013 ships with the latest revision of Microsoft's controversial user interface. For our staff
2

Appendix A: Office productivity suite cost comparisonsCompany-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 5 of 16

with years of experience using Office 2003's traditional menu-based interface, we can expect toincur significant downtime for staff retraining – even for basic tasks. This may carry an additional
cost for paid training materials. IT consultant rates for Microsoft products are also typically higher
than competing alternatives.
Full features and functionality on Microsoft Windows only

Although Office 2013 is available for Apple Mac computers, it differs in features and functionality.
Other business operating system (OS) products such as Ubuntu are not supported at all.
Microsoft Office’s lack of cross-platform OS support means:• Company-X is locked-in to using Windows. This limits our options should future business needs
require investigation of an alternative, non-Windows OS.
• Upgrading our Microsoft Windows licenses is a potential significant associated cost. For
example, Microsoft may withdraw support for running future versions of Office on our current
Windows version.
Product activation risks

Microsoft mandates proof of license purchase using an online activation process. Without this, thesoftware will only function with crippled functionality, or not at all. Activation schemes introduce
an additional layer of risk arising from legitimately-licensed software potentially ceasing to function
at critical times.
Extra computing hardware costs

Compared to competing alternatives, Office 2013 in tandem with Microsoft Windows generally
requires a more expensive computer to run the product with acceptable performance. In some cases
this may require upgrading existing computer hardware – effectively just to run Office 2013.
High exit cost

The combination of proprietary file formats, Windows-only support for full functionality, andsevere licensing complexity increases the cost and effort of migrating to alternative office software
products in the future.

Microsoft Office 365
Microsoft Office 365 uses Microsoft Office 2013 as a base and bundles it with additional cloudservices. It's delivered as an ongoing paid subscription (that is, software rental).

Advantages
Nominally low cost for not-for-profit organisations

The nominally low monthly cost per staff member is more attractive than Office 2013's higher
initial upfront cost.

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 6 of 16

Integration with other Microsoft services

Office 365 features integrated cloud storage, video calling, and a range of other bundled amenities.
Web app versions of Word, Excel, and PowerPoint

Web browser-based access to these applications with real-time collaborative editing is supported(albeit with a significantly reduced feature set).

Disadvantages
The disadvantages highlighted above for Office 2013 also apply to Office 365:
• Practically proprietary native file formats• Poor or non-existent support for Microsoft's own legacy file formats• Revised user interface is a substantial, disruptive change• Full features and functionality supported only on Microsoft Windows• Product activation risks• On-going subscription fees add up rapidly• High exit cost – heightened by Office 365's additional bundled services

LibreOffice
LibreOffice is a professional-grade business office software suite. It contains equivalentapplications, features, and functionality to Microsoft Office 2013. It's delivered as a full installation
on a computer hard drive.

Advantages
Full-featured, comprehensive office software suite

In terms of features LibreOffice will fulfil Company-X's current and future productivity needs. It
ships with equivalents for Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, and Visio. It contains many modern
amenities introduced in the 12 years since Office 2003's release – with additional features notpresent in any version of Microsoft Office (for example, full editable PDF support, and apresentation remote control app for smartphones).3
Industry standard file formats and open source technology

As highlighted in the Replacement native file format considerations section above, LibreOffice uses
the industry standard ODF file format. No proprietary vendor-only technology is used. Thisguarantees:• Long-term access to our IP• The broadest range of product alternatives
3

LibreOffice/Office2013 comparison: wiki.documentfoundation.org/Feature_Comparison:_LibreOffice__Microsoft_Office

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 7 of 16

• Deep product customisation if needed• Reduced vendor lock-in• Significantly reduced exit cost
Support for a wide range of other file formats

LibreOffice can open, modify, and save documents in a variety of proprietary Microsoft fileformats, including legacy file formats no longer supported by Microsoft. This allows us to manage
the majority of OOXML-format files, and enables continued access to existing IP stored in older
Microsoft formats.4
LibreOffice is compatible with dozens of additional non-Microsoft file formats. Microsoft Office bycomparison only supports a small subset.
Very low cost or no cost

LibreOffice is available in two editions:• LibreOffice (community version): this is free for both business and home use. It is not crippled inany way, and by itself is equivalent to Microsoft Office 2013. New versions containing featureenhancements are available every six months.
• LibreOffice from Collabora: this is an enterprise-hardened LibreOffice version, tested for
maximum stability and intended for business use. Security and bug fixes are released
immediately, and feature enhancements are available a few months after the community version.
Familiar yet modern user interface

LibreOffice features a traditional menu-based user interface, much closer to the Office 2003
interface our staff presently use. This translates to far less disruption for staff adapting to the new
product compared to the alternatives.
Full cross-platform OS support

LibreOffice runs with full feature parity across Microsoft Windows, Apple OS X, Ubuntu, andmany more OS products. Staff not using Windows do not have to sacrifice any functionality, and all
documents can be interchanged with 100 percent compatibility.
This enables a broad range of options should migration to an alternative OS in future be required.
Full cross-platform support reduces our exit cost, and reduces our Microsoft vendor lock-in.
No product activation

LibreOffice requires no product codes or online activation. The software will work the same way as
the day it was installed, permanently.
Simplified or no license management

The LibreOffice community version can be installed anywhere and distributed to anyone forbusiness and home use. There is no license management to speak of.
4

Appendix B: File format compatibility and support

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 8 of 16

The LibreOffice from Collabora version features simple license management, tracked via computer
installations. Additional license purchases are a simple, straightforward cost.
Work-at-home use is covered

For staff wanting to use the software at home, the community version of LibreOffice can beinstalled for no cost on an unlimited number of computers. Additionally, LibreOffice fromCollabora contains a work-at-home clause in the license agreement.
Built-in PDF editing and export support

LibreOffice features one-click PDF export. Full editable PDFs can also be created, removing theneed for expensive software such as Adobe Acrobat.
A wide range of third-party enhancements

LibreOffice features a thriving add-on ecosystem, enhancing the already full-featured product withhundreds of useful customisations.

Disadvantages
No cloud-based web applications

The competing office suites are available as web-based alternatives with real-time collaborative
editing (albeit with a far reduced feature set). Cloud support for LibreOffice is under active
development, but native LibreOffice web apps are not yet available.
Microsoft OOXML compatibility

All competing office suites (not just LibreOffice) will occasionally fail to successfully render files
saved in Microsoft OOXML format. This can be mitigated by one of several options, including
retaining a limited number of Microsoft Office installations, or using either ODF or PDF format.

Google Drive
Google Drive is a component of the Google Apps for Work suite. It consists of word processing,spreadsheet, and presentation applications, delivered as an online subscription-based service. Most
functionality is accessible from a web browser. With the exception of some minor components,
there is no software installation needed on a computer's hard drive.

Advantages
Nominally low monthly cost

The cost for the Google Apps for Work suite is between $US5.00 and US$10.00 per staff member
per month. When used on ChromeOS devices (such as Chromebooks) there are negligible device
support costs.
Most functionality is available anywhere

Google Drive is delivered over the Internet and accessed using a web browser. Consequently it isCompany-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 9 of 16

not dependent on any one OS product, and will work across Windows, OS X, and Ubuntu, withclose to full feature parity.
Integrated features for collaborative work

Google Drive is designed for group collaboration. Assuming a robust Internet connection, staff
working across physically disparate locations can collaborate in real time on documents.
Modifications and comments are automatically recorded.
Simplified license management

License compliance is much easier than Microsoft Office. Google Drive is an online-only service
with no software installation, no product activation, and no license key code tracking.
Integration with additional Google services

The Google Apps for Work suite bundles a range of additional services within the subscription cost,
including video calling, hosted email, and tools for building basic Intranet sites.
Better resource usage on older computers

Because Google Drive is delivered over the Internet and requires only a web browser, it will run on
older computer hardware. (Note however that this advantage may be offset against the Internet
connection's performance and availability.)

Disadvantages
Entirely closed, proprietary native file format

As highlighted in the Replacement native file format considerations section above, Google Drive's
native file format is not standardised and is entirely proprietary. From the standpoint of long-term
continuity of access to our IP, this is an arguably even worse scenario than using Microsoft Officeformat files – as Google is the sole supporting vendor. The format can be changed or obsoleted at
any time, with no choice of alternative vendors or support channels.
User interface is a substantial, disruptive change

Staff with years of experience using Office 2003's traditional menu-based interface shifting to acompletely web browser-based interface will require significant amounts of retraining.
Missing many powerful business-oriented features

Google's office web applications are adequate for basic use, but are missing a multitude of features
present in LibreOffice and Microsoft Office. This is due to both Google Drive's relative immaturity(compared to the decades of development and iterative improvements in the alternatives), andlimitations in Google's chosen technology.
Costs, terms of use, or the product can change at any time

Google can at any stage:• Increase the monthly or annual cost per customer accountCompany-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 10 of 16

• Change or remove features• Substantially alter or retire the entire product
Google is well known to frequently alter product user interfaces, causing significant disruption tofamiliar, established workflows.
Paid services make up a comparatively tiny amount of Google's revenue. Generally, over 90 percent
of Google's total global revenue on any given quarter is generated by online advertising – comparedto other competing vendors for which office productivity software is a core business. Google also
has a well-established track record of shutting down large numbers of products on a frequent basis.
Ongoing subscription costs

Google can change the monthly subscription costs at any time. Consider a future scenario involving
severe financial constraints. If subscription costs cannot be met, access to the service is cut off
entirely. Compare this to traditional software, which will continue to work the same way,
permanently.
Depends on an Internet connection

Generally, Google Drive requires constant high-speed Internet connectivity. This poses a problem
for remote workers with intermittent or slow Internet access.
If the company Internet connection performance is impaired, or goes down entirely, this will create
large-scale disruption with most staff unable to work.
Requires a Google account

Google Drive's tight integration with Google's other services translates to a high degree of vendor
lock-in and associated increased exit costs.

Recommendations
Replacement office software suite: LibreOffice
LibreOffice is the recommended replacement office suite for Company-X, based on the key
considerations of:
1. Guaranteed continuity of access to our IP
2. Costs – both direct and indirect
3. General features and functionality, balanced against Company-X's particular use caseSpecifically, LibreOffice from Collabora should be the primary replacement product, due to its
additional enterprise-focused layer of security and stability.
LibreOffice adoption should be aligned with a carefully documented and executed migration plan.

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 11 of 16

Adopted standard file format: ODF
ODF should be adopted as Company-X's standard file format, replacing the existing Microsoft
Office file formats.
New file format adoption should also be aligned to a migration plan.

Migration plan
A detailed migration plan is outside the scope of this document. As a summary however, thefollowing example approach could be taken.
1) Install LibreOffice alongside Microsoft Office on all staff computers

Staff familiarise themselves with the new software. A welcome pack and introductory training isprovided by a migration partner.5
2) Assess special use cases

Identify and ringfence use cases where Microsoft Office is required. Examples include external
agencies which mandate Microsoft file formats. Workarounds and alternative approaches areinvestigated as a parallel effort, without delaying the rest of the migration project.
Note that one eventual outcome may be Company-X retaining limited installations of Microsoft
Office for these specialised scenarios.
3) Assess existing documents stored in proprietary Microsoft formats

These are identified as either editable documents or non-editable documents.
Documents needing to be editable are converted to ODF.
Documents not needing to be editable are converted to PDF.
The original files are then backed up and archived permanently.
4) Advise staff to use LibreOffice exclusively

On an agreed date, LibreOffice becomes the primary office software suite. Files in Microsoft format
are opened in LibreOffice, and converted to ODF format.
Document conversion problems (for example, caused by particularly complex source material) are
captured for further investigation by IT and the migration partner.
A feedback process (part of a wider communications plan) can be introduced to help staff feel thatthey are engaged in the migration effort. This can also help address any potential problems early on.
5) Identify a date for retiring Microsoft Office

On an agreed date, Microsoft Office 2003 is uninstalled from all staff computers (excluding any
special use cases). The migration is now complete.
IT and the migration partner continue with post-migration support and training.
5

Appendix C: Migration partner

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 12 of 16

Appendix A: Office productivity suite cost comparisonsProduct

Initial Costs

Hidden Costs

Microsoft Office 2013
Professional

From Reseller-X:• $100 Windows licence per Windows upgrade• $46,500• $20 Windows Server CAL per Windows upgrade

Comprising:• Licenses:∘ 200 × $132.08 = $26,418 (Note: this is charity pricing)• Migration services and training:∘ $20,000• $20 Windows RDS CAL per Windows upgrade• $250 device support time per annum• $50 server support time per annum• $20 client antivirus per annum• $20 antivirus support time per annum• EEE costs

Our user license count is growing due to the proliferation ofaffordable computing devices. This will potentially increase ourlicensing costs going forward.
Microsoft Office 365

From www.office365.com:• Same hidden costs as Office 2013

• $35,600 (initial cost), then $15,600 per annum• $250 device support time per annum• Office 365 Nonprofit E3 Plan licenses:• Contains a subset of Office 2013’s functionality – Office 2013 is required forfull functionality• Functionality is reduced on non-Windows devices∘ 200 users × $6.50 × 12 months = $15,600 per annum (Note:
this is charity pricing)• Migration services and training:• Deeply complex Microsoft license management adds potentially significant
cost to what is already listed here
• EEE costs

Comprising:∘ $20,000

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 13 of 16

Product

Initial Costs

Hidden Costs

LibreOffice (community
version)From migration partner:• $250 device support time

• No initial costComprising:

There are fewer hidden costs compared to Office 2013 running on Windows.
There is a potential for significant savings.

• Licenses:∘ No cost• Migration services and training:∘ $8,000
LibreOffice from Collabora From Collabora Productivity reseller:•$10,000 (initial cost), then US$2,000 per annum.

Comprising:• $250 device support time
There are fewer hidden costs compared to Office 2013 running on Windows.
There is a potential for significant savings.

• Licenses:∘ 200 users × US$10.00 = US$2,000 per annum• Migration services and training:∘ $8,000
Google Drive

From Google:• $24,000 per annum
Comprising:• Licenses:• $250 device support time (unless ChromeOS devices are used)
There are fewer hidden costs compared to Office 2013 running on Windows.
There is a potential for significant savings, especially if Google Drive is used on
ChromeOS-based devices.

∘ 200 users × $120.00 = $24,000 per annum• Migration services and training:∘ $20,000
CAL: Microsoft Client Access License
EEE: Embrace, extend and extinguish6
6

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguishCompany-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 14 of 16

Appendix B: File format compatibility and support
File Format

Microsoft Office 2013 Support?

LibreOffice Support?

Google Drive Support?

DOC, XLS, PPT

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

DOCX, XLSX, PPTX
(Microsoft Office 2007/2010)

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

DOCX, XLSX, PPTX
(Microsoft Office 2007/2010(OOXML transitional)

Yes. Used by Office 2013 as the default.

Yes.

Yes.

DOCX, XLSX, PPTX
(Microsoft Office OOXML
strict)Yes. However, not used as the default in any
Microsoft Office suite.

Yes.

Yes.

OpenDocument Format (ODF)

Yes.

Yes.

Yes – via import.

General Microsoft file format
compatibility

Excellent. However, Microsoft is withdrawing
support for older file formats in new Microsoft
Office releases.

Good. Note that LibreOffice will often
Good.
successfully open corrupted Microsoft Officefiles even when Microsoft Office itself fails
to do so.

Microsoft Office 95 and earlier

No. Cannot by default open documents saved in
Microsoft Office 95 and earlier file formats.

Yes.

No.

General file format
compatibility

Poor. Only a small number of additional fileformats supported.

Excellent. Compatibility for hundreds ofdifferent file formats.

Poor. Only a small number of additional fileformats supported.

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 15 of 16

Appendix C: Migration partner
Company-X can choose to work with an IT services consultancy to ensure a smooth and successful
migration. This migration partner will provide:• Assistance for designing the migration plan
• LibreOffice from Collabora product licenses• Customised training material, and a LibreOffice welcome pack for staff• One-on-one support for staff as and when needed, both during and post-migration
The objective of the welcome pack and online training materials is to help staff rapidly familiarise
themselves with the new product.
The migration partner will work closely with the Company-X Information Systems Manager andmigration Project Manager.
Company-Y is a potential migration partner:•

www.Company-Y.co

Company-X
Office Suite And Editable Document Format Upgrade Options

Page 16 of 16