Activity Report for Fiscal Year 2011

Project on Measures for Rationalizationof International Energy Use
Project on Human Resources Development
for Energy Conservation“Project on Improvement in Infrastructure
for Energy Management in ASEAN Countries”

ACTIVITY REPORTMarch 2012

The Energy Conservation Center, Japan

Table of Contents
Summary…………………………………………………………………………………......... 1
I. Objectives and Background of the Project……………………………………………… I-1
II. Plan of ASEAN Energy Management System and Implementation Plan for
FY2011-2012 Aiming to Construct the System……………………………………….. II-1
II-1. ASEAN Energy Management System Construction Plan………………………….. II-1
II-2. Implementation Plan for FY2011-FY2012…………………………………………... II-5
III. Activities in Each Country (Intensive Seminar-Workshops, Training, and Advisory
Visits to Companies)…………………………………………………………………… III-1
III-1. Overview…………………………………………………………………………….. III-1
III-2. Activities and Implementation Results in Each Country………………................ III-3
III-2-1. Myanmar…………………………………………………………………………… III-3
III-2-2. Malaysia……………………………………………………………………………III-18
III-2-3. Lao PDR…………………………………………………………………………... III-33
III-2-4. Thailand…………………………………………………………………………… III-44
III-3. Outcomes of Activity in Each Country……………………………….. ………….III-49
III-3-1. Summary of Results of Implementing Intensive Seminar-Workshops, Training andAdvisory Visits…………………………………………..……………………….. III-49
III-3-2. Activities relating to the Development and Dissemination of the Energy Management
Handbook…………………………………………………………………………... III-51
IV. Development and Operation of Functions to be equipped in the ASEAN Energy
Management System…………………………………………………………………… IV-1
IV-1. Overview……………………………………………………………………………... IV-1
IV-2. Operation of the Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for
Industries and Buildings…………………………………………………………… IV-4
IV-2-1. Results of the 5th Awards…………………………………………………………… IV-4
IV-2-2. Analysis of Information Provision Methods for Disseminating Best Practices in Energy
Management……………………………………………………………………… IV-21
IV-2-3. Points to be Improved in the Future, and the Latest Plan……………..................... IV-21
IV-3. Building of an Information System for Utilizing Existing Implementing
Organizations (ASEAN Energy Management Service)……………………….…IV-22
IV-3-1. Progress Situation and Issues in the System Building…………………………….. IV-22

IV-3-2. Latest Plan…………………………………………………………………………. IV-23
IV-4. Development and Dissemination of Tools for Energy Management………….…IV-24
IV-4-1. Dissemination of the Energy Management Handbook………………………......... IV-24
IV-4-2. Dissemination of In-house Database and Technical Directory (Industries andBuildings)……………………………………………………………………….... IV-25
IV-4-3. Development of Technical Handbooks……………………………………………. IV-25
IV-5. Investigation of Building an other Information System (e-Directory)……….... IV-27
V. Results of Discussions at the Summary Workshop………………………………… ….V-1
V-1. Summary of the Project Implementation Results and Outcomes in FY2011…………... V-1
V-2. Latest Plan of the ASEAN Energy Management System based on the Implementation
Results………………………………………………………………………………….. V-7
V-3.Discussion on the Direction for New Project after 2012-2013……………………………………………………………………………………...

V-9

VI. Reference Materials (Not attached to this document)
VI-1. Presentation Materials Used in Intensive Seminar-Workshop (Common for four countries)
VI-2. Presentation Materials Used in Training Course Utilizing Energy Management
Handbook (Common for three countries)
VI-3. Presentation Materials Used in Summary and Post Workshop
VI-4. Loca Activity ReportSummary
In spite of receiving effects from the European financial crisis and the progress of the economic
downturn in the US and Japan, the various ASEAN countries, China and India are continuing with
their economic growth. Following from this, their energy consumption amounts are increasing, andthis situation is expected to increase further in the future. It is believed that the more efficient use ofenergy would contribute to the prevention of global warming and environmental preservation
activities.
This project is one pillar of the ASEAN energy cooperation that is authorized at the energy ministerlevel on the ASEAN side as the PROMEEC (Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation),
which currently comprises the three projects of “Major Industries”, “Buildings”, and the “Energy
Management System”.
The Major Industries and Buildings energy conservation promotion projects are entering their twelfth
years, while the Energy Management System project is beginning its eighth year. The activities carriedout by related persons in the various ASEAN countries, including our counterpart organization, theASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE), have also become increasingly active, and the projects havebecome firmly established. On the other hand, the price of crude oil, which had been fluctuatingaround the US$90/barrel level, has recently been showing signs of a gradual rise, due partly to theinstability of the situation in the Middle East. Because there are limitations in the amount ofrecoverable oil reserves, awareness that the price of crude oil will continue to rise over the long term is
becoming established. In practice, the rise in energy prices is threatening the competitiveness ofcompanies, so that together with the further development and reduction in costs of renewable energies,
the further enhancement of energy conservation promotions that realize an immediate effect will be
required. In view of this change, while it is a fact that the PROMEEC Project has been building anenergy conservation promotion infrastructure and contributing to improved awareness in order toreduce energy consumption in the various countries concerned through implementing its activities, it is
becoming necessary to implement activities at an even higher level to build an infrastructure that is
capable of certainly promoting energy conservation.
Against the background described above, the project with the various ASEAN countries in the current
fiscal year has been positioned as activities following the entry to the third stage, working even harder
towards the implementation and dissemination of the results that have been achieved up till now
through self-help efforts. That is, in a continuation from the previous fiscal year, by building on theactual results and outcomes of energy audits that were implemented in various types of factories andbuildings in the ASEAN countries carried out in the past, we are aiming to establish the infrastructureand educate the human resources required to implement and disseminate actual improvements
centered on improvement measures discussed and proposed in each country. Further more, it wasplanned to incorporate the introduction of JASE-World activity and their Technical Directory for more
information of high efficiency energy conservation technology and equipment to promote energy
conservation measures, and to establish the infrastructure of dissemination of them.
In addition to the Major Industries and Buildings Project activities, this project was started in 2004
based on an agreement obtained through discussions held with representatives of each of the ASEAN
countries in an aim to prepare and enhance the Energy Management System in the various ASEAN
countries that will become the core for promoting energy conservation to more effectively achieve theabove objectives. With the objective of rationalizing this project, first the basic functions of theASEAN Energy Management System which can be commonly used in the 10 ASEAN countries were-1-

to be constructed taking around five or six years, and continuing from the previous year the current
fiscal year was also positioned as the year in which this objective would be realized.
Accordingly, in the current fiscal year, based on the basic plan of the ASEAN Energy Management
System, the construction and operation of the functions were started as shown below while
maintaining links with the Major Industries and Buildings projects, and the following results wereachieved.
1. Implementation of an Awards system that has the purpose of information sharing related to the Best
Practices of Energy Management for Industries and Buildings, and the announcing of awarded casestudies☛ The fifth Award ceremony was completed in May 2011. 24 case studies were received as
applications from seven countries, and 12 case studies received awards.
2. Review of energy management tools (Technical Directory, In-house Database, Handbooks), and theconstruction and operation of a dissemination system☛ Dissemination of the Energy Management Handbook, and preparation of related handbooks.
3. Construction and operation of an existing implementing organization usage system that is capable ofproviding energy audits and training☛ Expansion of the registration of implementing organization, and start of trial operation of the“ASEAN Energy Management Service”, which is a search system between implementing
organizations and ASEAN customers.
4. Enlargement of the ASEAN Network of Cooperators☛ Expanding the number of members in the Network of Cooperators through providing advice toparticipants in Seminar-Workshops and by visiting companies.
Specifically, the following activities were implemented and smoothly completed, achieving the targets
described above.
Intensive Seminar-Workshops were held in four ASEAN countries, and advisory visits were also
made to several companies and organizations. The basic plans of this project and the latest“ASEAN Energy Management System” were introduced to related persons, and in addition togathering opinions, requests were made for people to participate in the project planning and utilize
the programs and tools. Further, as described below Training was implemented in three counties inorder to encourage use of the Energy Management Handbook.
Operation of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industries
and Buildings
The Award system which was started in fiscal year 2006, was operated smoothly. This system isplanned to collect outstanding case studies in energy management in the Industries and Buildings
sectors and disseminate them in each ASEAN country, and the 5th Awards were completed.
The Board of Judges (BOJ) meeting for selecting the Awards was held on May 23-24, 2011.
Among the 24 cases that were collected from seven countries as Best Practices for the 5th EnergyAwards ceremony, a total of 12 cases were selected. These consisted of Special Submissions
Awards given in each of the Industries (Large scale) and the Buildings (Large scale, and Small and-2-Medium scale) fields, together with Best Practice Awards given to two cases in the Industries
sector and one case in the Building sector, and outstanding case study awards given to six othercases. These cases were awarded at a ceremony that took place during the AMEM (ASEAN
Ministers Meeting on Energy) Meeting which was held in Brunei Darussalam in September 2011.
Following this, the awarded cases were uploaded on the ASEAN Centre for Energy website withthe objective of wide dissemination.
The call for submission of applications for the 6th Energy Awards has been carried out fromJanuary 2012. When implementing this call for submissions, analysis was carried out of the resultsof the 5th awards, and improvements were made in order to collect cases that have greater
dissemination effect.
Construction of a system for disseminating various types of energy management tools (Technical
Directory, In-house Database, Handbook, etc.), and its partial operation
The Energy Management Handbook was finally completed in January 2009. In addition, theTechnical Directory and the In-house Database, which were developed in a continuation of the
Major Industries and Buildings Projects, were set as energy management basic tools together with
the Energy Management Handbook, and were disseminated during the Intensive
Seminar-Workshops and Training in each country. Regarding the Technical Directory and the
In-house Database, reviews were investigated concerning the information gathering methods andthe contents.
Regarding the Energy Management Handbook, translation to the local language was strongly
required in Myanmar and Cambodia, however, it was a little hard for them to proceed it by theirself effort, so we supported for translation of them and they have been finished within this fiscal
year Although the translation to the local language in Lao PDR had been completed, support forbinding was provided to allow distribution at the seminars.
Construction of the ASEAN Energy Management Service
Aiming to achieve wide utilization of existing implementing organizations in various ASEAN
countries, the registration of implementing organizations in the completed Customer and
Implementing Organization Registration Search System (This was previously known as the Cyber
Search System or the Online Energy Information System, but the name was changed to the
ASEAN Energy Management Service from the current fiscal year) has been carried out throughthe Focal Points in each country, and 17 companies have completed registration. Moving towards
the start of trial operations, in addition to striving to carry out PR activities targeting potential
customers through the implementation of further activities by the Focal Points in each country, we
encouraged additional registration of implementing organizations in each country.
Investigation of the ASEAN Energy Management System (Step-2) Basic Plan
Based on the activity outcomes and actual results described above, the construction of the basic
functions of the ASEAN Energy Management System has been almost completed as planned, andthe Step-1 System has begun operations. While evaluating the actual results using this system, wewere additionally investigating the improvement and addition of functions in an aim to develop thissystem into the Step-2 System as a system that would be even more effective and easy to use.
However, many things need to be implemented to realize this aim, and regrettably we could not
make as much progress as expected, so that in the current fiscal year the Step-1 functions were
thoroughly completed and a review was carried out in order to allow the actual start of Step-2.
Note that in the project of the current fiscal year, local activities started from the Board of Judges-3-

(BOJ) meeting to select the 5th Energy Awards case studies in May 2011. However, the practical startof activities is the Inception Workshop (Three Joint Projects) held in July 2011 to finalize the projectplan and confirm the implementation preparations. Following this, activities were implemented in four
countries, and the activity results and outcomes were shared among the representatives from eachcountry at the Summary and Post Workshops (Three Joint Projects) held in early March 2012. In
addition, the policies of future activities to be tackled in the next fiscal year and beyond werediscussed at this workshop.
The specific activity contents in the current fiscal year in this project are as described below.
1. Board of Judges: May 23-24, 2011 (Overseas business trip: May 22-28)
Eight Judges gathered in Singapore to evaluate the 24 case studies that had been submitted from sevencountries, and selected cases of Energy Management in the Industry and Building sectors to award.
2. Inception Workshop: July 21-22, 2011 (Overseas business trip: July 20-23)
Participation was made in the Inception Workshop on Promotion of Energy Efficiency andConservation (PROMEEC) (Major Industry, Building and Energy Management), SOME - METI Work
Program 2011 - 2012 (Held in Bangkok, Thailand, jointly with Major Industries and Buildings). Notethat the business trip period included the advance meetings with the ASEAN Centre for Energy.
21 persons gathered, including persons related to focal point of each ASEAN country, the ASEAN
Centre for Energy (ACE), and representatives of the Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ), anddiscussed the following subjects.
Opening Greetings (Related representatives including persons from the host country)
Session 1: Buildings Project Implementation Plan
Session 2: Major Industries Project Implementation Plan and Joint Activities Plan
(Joint Activities: Development of In-house Database and Technical Directory for Buildings and Major
Industries)
Session 3: Energy Management Project Implementation PlanThe Energy Management Project in the current fiscal year was planned as described below. Althoughimplementation requests were received from seven countries (Brunei Darussalam, Lao PDR, Indonesia,
Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam), the four countries of Myanmar, Malaysia, Lao PDR, andThailand were selected for implementation through coordination with other implementation requests
and plans in the PROMEEC Projects,. The activity contents basically consisted of the following three
activities.
(1) Activity-1: Intensive Seminar-Workshop (First Day)
(2) Activity-2: Practical Training Activity utilizing the Energy Management Handbook, etc. (Second Day)
(3) Activity-3: Advisory Visits to factories and buildings and counseling including Energy Management
Handbook introduction, use, follow-up, and/or new implementation(Third Day)
3. First Local Activity: October 24 to November 2, 2011 (Overseas business trip: October 23 toNovember 3)
The following activities were implemented in the two countries of Myanmar and Malaysia.
(1) Implementation of the Intensive Seminar-Workshop (ISW)The project activities and the ASEAN Energy Management System basic plan, together with theincluded functions and tools, were explained to the related persons, and analyses of case studies
from the current fiscal year’s ASEAN Award of Best Practice in Energy Management for Industries-4-and Buildings were also introduced. In addition, requests were made that the workshop participants
should participate in the project planning and should utilize the programs and tools. Although casestudy training used to be carried out using the Best Practice case studies in a Group Work format
during the ISW, the Group Work in the current fiscal year’s ISW was canceled for the reason that it
was similar to the Group Work carried out on the following day. Additionally, in the current fiscal
year a theme relating to Awareness & Financing was adopted as Session 3 and reporting from thehost country, ECCJ, and ACE was planned. However, no report was presented by the host country.
(2) Training for Utilization of the Energy Management Handbook
Regarding the utilization of the Energy Management (EM) Handbook, although training was
implemented concerning the utilization methods, as well as giving lectures on the contents of theEnergy Management Handbook, group activities were carried out using the same case studies inboth countries. These consisted of the application contents submitted by the Green Energy Officefrom Malaysia and Glaxo Wellcome Manufacturing from Singapore, which received ASEAN
Awards in the current fiscal year.
(3) Advisory Visits to Companies Willing to Introduce the EM Handbook
Advisory visits were made to one company in Myanmar (Earth Industrial (Myanmar) Co. Ltd.) andtwo companies in Malaysia (Green Tech Malaysia and Diamond Building) that are willing to
newly introduce energy management tools including the EM Handbook. Based on the on-site
inspections of the buildings and factories, advice was given and exchanges of opinions were maderegarding energy conservation promotion activities for each of the companies.
4. Second Local Activity: January 11-16, 2012 (Overseas business trip: January 9-18)
The following activities were implemented in the two countries of Lao PDR and Thailand.
(1) Implementation of the Intensive Seminar-Workshop (ISW)The ISW implemented in Lao PDR had the same contents as the ones in Myanmar and Malaysia
described above, but in Thailand a so-called “Focused Group Meeting” was held in the same way
as two years ago, in which consultants and persons related to ESCO businesses gathered together
led by the Focal Point, DEDE, Ministry of Energy. In addition to introducing the ASEAN Energy
Management System and the tools in the PROMEEC Energy Management Project, exchange of
opinions was made in order to realize further improvements.
(2) Training for Utilization of the Energy Management Handbook
This activity was only implemented in Lao PDR. As well as distributing the Energy Management
Handbook which had already been translated to Laotian to all of the participants, in the case study
training two of the ASEAN Best Practice case studies from the current fiscal year were selected by
the Laotian side and group activities were carried out. In spite of the fact that the training was heldin Savannakhet in the central part of Lao PDR, which is a long distance from the capital Vientianerequiring a five or six-hour drive, the Focal Point and other related persons who participated from
Vientiane kindly and positively participated by becoming advisors in the group activities in apositive step towards the independent implementation of these activities.
(3) Advisory Visits to Companies Willing to Introduce the EM Handbook
Advisory visit was made to the Lam Plastic Manufacturing Company in Lao PDR which is willingto newly introduce energy management tools including the EM Handbook. Based on the on-site
inspections of the buildings and factories, advice was given and exchanges of opinions werecarried out regarding the energy conservation promotion activities in the company, and utilizationof the Energy Management Handbook was promoted.

-5-5. Research Forum in Japan
In the current fiscal year, the Research Forum in Japan was not implemented due to budgetary reasonsand less necessity to hold it in this year.
6. Summary & Post Workshop: March 7-9, 2012 (Overseas business trip: March 6-10)
Participation was made in the Summary and Post Workshop on Promotion of Energy Efficiency andConservation (PROMEEC) (Major Industry, Building and Energy Management), SOME–METI Work
Program 2011–2012 (Held in Siem Reap, Cambodia, jointly with the Major Industries and Buildings).
12 persons gathered, including persons related to the various ASEAN countries, the ASEAN Centre
for Energy (ACE), and representatives from the Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ), andcarried out the following summarization and discussions. Note that for unavoidable reasons, there wasno participation in the Workshop this time by Myanmar, Philippines and Singapore.
Situation and key points of the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC) 2010-2015
Confirmation of basic activities policies in Phase-3
Summary Workshop
Session 1: Energy Management Project Activity Results and Outcomes
Session 2: Major Industries Project Activity Results and Outcomes
Session 3: Buildings Project Activity Results and Outcomes- Evaluation Report of Current Fiscal Year Activity Results and Outcomes (Summaries by the various
countries and ECCJ)- Policies for activities in the next fiscal year and beyond: Current style of the project was declared tobe finalized in this fiscal year, and new project requirements and their contents from ASEAN
countries are confirmed and discussed in the following Post Workshop.
Post Workshop- Discussions on Post PROMEEC Project directions and contents
Based on the evaluation of actual results up to the current fiscal year and request and discussion for
new project, mutual basic understanding was obtained to conduct the project to be much linked withbusiness development with Energy Efficiency and Conservation Technologies and Equipment, while
main focus still on Human Resources Development. According to this result, project development
policy will be decided by the discussion with METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan),and obtained with ASEAN SOME-METI agreement, then details shall be discussed and decided at the
Inception Workshop in the next fiscal year.
While continuing to realize support in the current fiscal year for firmly building the infrastructure ineach of the ASEAN countries to realize continued energy conservation activities, activities were also
conducted in the higher level PROMEEC Project Phase-3 that is seeking to enlarge the actual
implementation and dissemination through increasing the level of self-help efforts by each country.
As a result, the Step-1 System has been almost completed, providing the basic functions for the
ASEAN Energy Management System which realizes the target of shared use among various ASEAN
countries, and an infrastructure allowing smooth operation has been established. The dissemination
activities of the key energy management tools were also actively carried out, and it was also possible
to smoothly operate the ASEAN Award System of Best Practice in Energy Management for Industries
and Buildings. In addition, many fruitful results were obtained, including the fact that it was possible-6-to expand the Network of Cooperation to include many related persons, companies, and organizations.
The implementation situation of the local activities held during past 8 years up till now is shown in thetable below. In the ASEAN region, Singapore as a developed nation has not made implementation
requests regarding this project since the end of the initial two-year period, and has been taking the
stance of giving the opportunities to other countries. Thailand has also taken the same position, and it
differs from the other countries in requesting opportunities that mainly consist of discussing key issues
and exchanging opinions and information.
Fiscal
Year
年度

ブルネイ
Brunei

Cambodia
カンボジア

インドネシアIndonesia

Lao
ラオス
PDR

マレーシア
Malaysia

Myanmar
ミャンマー

2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

●▲

●▲

●▲

●■
●◆■
●◆■

●▲
▲
●■

●▲

●■
●■
●◆■
●◆■
●◆■

●▲
▲
●■
●◆■
●◆■

●■
●◆■
●◆■
●◆■

●▲
▲
●■
●■

●◆■
●◆■
●◆■ ●◆■ ●◆■SeminarTraining
Company Visits
SurveysSpecial Group Meetings●：ｾﾐﾅｰ、◆：研修、■：企業訪問、▲：調査、▼：特定ｸﾞﾙｰﾌﾟ会合
●◆■

●◆■

Philippines
フィリピン シンガポール
Singapore●▲▲

Thailandタイ

Vietnam
ベトナム

●▲
▲

●▲
▲
●■
●■
●◆■

▼
▼■

●◆■

●◆■
▼●

Finally, when implementing this project, it was possible to obtain the full cooperation of the persons incharge at related organizations in all the countries, including the ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE).
We would like to take the opportunity here to warmly thank all the people concerned.

-7-

I. Objectives and Background of the ProjectThis project aims to plan to build a stable and appropriate energy demand structure corresponding to
the internal and external economic and social environments in countries and regions that contribute to
the stable supply of energy to Japan by investigating and providing advice on effective energy usage
policies through carrying out energy measures, understanding and analyzing energy consumption
trends, and interchanges of human resources.
The project has been carried out since 2000, and is known on the ASEAN side as the PROMEEC
Project. PROMEEC is the abbreviation of “Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation”, and isa project conducted in cooperation with the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry that is
authorized by the Senior Officials Meeting on Energy in the 10 ASEAN countries. It comprises thethree projects of the Major Industries Energy Conservation Promotion Project (PROMEEC (Major
Industries)), the Building Energy Conservation Promotion Project (PROMEEC (Buildings)), and theEnergy Management System Improvement Project (This project: PROMEEC (Energy Management)).
This project started from fiscal year 2004, four years later than the other two projects. It isconstructing the ASEAN Energy Management System that is essential for promoting energy
conservation in the Industries sector and Buildings sector of various ASEAN countries, and is
supporting the forming of a mechanism to enable the realization of improvements from a technical andpractical viewpoint. That is, it supports activities on the ASEAN side that plan to promote energy
conservation by enhancing energy management particularly in the fields of Major Industries andBuildings in various ASEAN countries, and as a result it promotes energy conservation measures inSoutheast Asian countries in an aim to contribute to and aid the promotion of energy conservation
together with environmental preservation.
This project is constructing the Energy Management System essential for energy conservation
promotion in the Industries sector and Buildings sector, and cooperates in supporting improvementsfrom a technical and operations viewpoint.
The ultimate objectives of this project are the construction and operation of the ASEAN Energy
Management System which can be commonly used by the ASEAN countries. The utilization of thissystem is expected to contribute to the establishment of a sustainable system for energy conservation
promotion in the Industries and Buildings sectors.
In order to realize and achieve these targets, activities are being implemented that place great
importance on the following points.
1. The “ASEAN Energy Management System” should be provided with the following functions, andshould be easy and practical for users. That is, the following functions should be the basis of thesystem.
♠ The supply of useful information♠ The provision of services such as energy audits and training♠ Rules and systems for appropriately and smoothly operating the above functions
In addition, specific and effective sub-systems, programs, and tools should be prepared for eachI-1

function described above.
2. Effective links should be made with energy conservation promotion projects in the Industries sector
and Buildings sector. (Information sharing and utilization for dissemination of result)
3. Creation and expansion of the ASEAN Network of Cooperators formed by ASEAN countries inorder to widely disseminate the ASEAN Energy Management System while continuously
improving and operating it.
It is believed that a long-term viewpoint will be required for tackling the items described above. Firstthe Step-1 System which fully provides the basic functions and necessary minimum programs, tools,
and sub-systems was established over a five to six-year period in the current fiscal year, and operations
have been started. Then based on an evaluation of the operation and dissemination of the Step-1
System, in addition to improving the system it is planned to establish and start operations of the Step-2
System that adds the functions and programs that are thought to be additionally required.
The Step-1 System that has been almost completed in the current fiscal year has been constructed andoperated as described below. In addition, activities were also implemented for the dissemination andapplication of this system.
(Phase 1): Completed
Development of the plan for the ASEAN Energy Management System based on the Energy
Management System investigation in the ASEAN countries and the transfer of technology andexperience to the ASEAN countries from Japan.
Appropriate reviews of parts of the plan should be carried out as required.
(Phase 2): The Step-1 System has been completed. The Step-2 System investigation has started.
Development of the methods of constructing and operating the ASEAN Energy Management System(Phase 3): Step-1 System has been completed.
Operation and improvement of the ASEAN Energy Management System by the ASEAN countries
The programs required for the basic functions have been completed, and the basic tools for energy
management including the Energy Management Handbook have also been finished. In addition, thesub-systems including the information system required for disseminating the Energy Management
Best Practices that have been collected through the Awards system, and the reciprocal search system(ASEAN Energy Management Service) between the energy management implementing organizations
and customers, have reached the actual operation stage.
At the same time, in order that the same system described above will be capable of dissemination in
the ASEAN region and can be practically used by the related persons, local activity plans weredeveloped in four countries, and the activities were implemented. In addition, the ASEAN Award
System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings has already successfullycompleted its 5th Energy Awards. Further, improvement policies were also specified from an operation
viewpoint, and in the future it is planned that the Board of Judges for the ASEAN region shall holddiscussions to determine implementation rules which match the evaluation guidelines.
Note that although time was taken to carry out the initial registration of implementing organizations in
the ASEAN Energy Management Service, the registration of the implementing organizations wasbasically completed in the current fiscal year. In addition, while it has been judged that the registrationof customers is not always required and this registration has been put off, requests were made for evenmore registrations of implementing organizations in each country.

I-2

The Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ) is in charge of implementing this project, andactivities have been implemented mainly by the following three experts. In addition, the ASEAN
Centre for Energy (ACE) in Jakarta, Indonesia has become the contact point for the ASEAN region,
responsible for linking with the contact organizations (Focal Points) in each country and cooperatingwith the promotion implementation.
Technical Cooperation Department of the International Cooperation Division:Experts, their duties and back grounds
General Manager Mr. Yutaka Ogura Project Manager: Industries (Iron & Steel)Technical Expert Mr. Fumio Ogawa Leader: Industries (Petroleum Refining)Technical Expert Mr. Takashi Sato
Sub-Leader: Industries (Petrochemical Plants)

I-3

II. Plan of ASEAN Energy Management System and Implementation Plan for FY2011-2012
Aiming to Construct the System
II-1. ASEAN Energy Management System Construction Plan
The system plan of the established ASEAN Energy Management System is shown in Fig. II-1-1.
Regist.
Experts

ASEAN
Customers
Information
Service
ASEAN Network of
Cooperators

One-Stop
to System

Advisory
Service
EnergyAudit“ASEAN Energy
Management System”

Campaign/
Award
SystemTraining
Service
Coordination

ECCJ

ASEAN
Stakeholders
Fig. II-1-1: Plan of ASEAN Energy Management System

In the system described above, first the most important functions were developed and built as the firststage, and operations were actually started as the Step-1 System using the functions that were capableof being used. Then, while assessing the results of these operations, the addition of further effectivefunctions was investigated, and progress was made from fiscal year 2009 to the Step-2 System as thesecond stage in which priority items were developed and prepared. Note that even in the development
stage of the Step-2 System, it was determined to establish a system and program that would
continually improve the Step-1 System.
In consideration of this point, the basic schedule of the ASEAN Energy Management System wasrenewed. Fig. II-1-2 shows the latest schedule for the construction of the ASEAN Energy Management
System. This figure indicates that the Step-1 System should have been completed in fiscal year 2011,
but since it has not yet actually been completed, the completion year was changed to fiscal year 2012.

II-1

System
Level

STEP - 1

Main Activities

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Completion of "ASEAN Energy
Management Service"
Verification & Improvement in
Programs & Tools
Development of Additional
Functions / Programs / Tools

Completion

STEP - 2 Working & Tuning Prepared New
Functions / Programs / Tools
Verification & Improvement in
Programs & Tools
Entire Operation of ASEAN Energy
System Management System
Fig. II-1-2: Schedule for Constructing the ASEAN Energy Management System
The activities in which priorities were placed in fiscal year 2011 are shown below.
(1) The 5th Energy Awards of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practice in Energy Management for
Industries and Buildings were smoothly completed, and the points that should be improved froman operation point of view were narrowed down. In particular, from the point of view ofencouraging submissions, improvements were pursued to enable the collection of a wider range ofeven better cases. To realize this, from the previous fiscal year two types of classifications
consisting of large-scale, and small and medium-scale were prepared using the annual energy
consumption amounts, in order to increase the number of submissions and the opportunities forsmall and medium-scale enterprises to receive awards. Additionally, a category known as Special
Submissions was also established for evaluating the energy conservation effect of single
technologies and equipment in a start to reconsider the system to realize the gathering andawarding of more improvement cases. However, the results of these improvements have not yet
been fully reflected in the number of submissions. The application situation is shown in Table
II-1-1, from which it can be seen that although many applications are being made relating tobuildings in the small and medium scale sector, no application has been made regarding industries
in the two years since establishing the new classification. Further, the opposite situation is foundin the Special Submissions category, where there are many submissions relating to industries, but
only one regarding buildings. We anticipate that there will be many submissions in these fields aswell. In addition, the numbers of applications and number of awards received by each country in
the five Energy Awards are shown in Fig. II-1-3.
(2) The standard energy management tools should be prepared and popularized. That is, although theASEAN Energy Management Handbook has already been finalized, it should be systematicallyutilized as an effective tool together with the In-house Database and Technical Directory, andactivities are being developed to promote their utilization and dissemination in each country.
Additionally, in the Industries and Buildings groups, work to review the actual In-house Databaseand Technical Directory is being investigated together with ACE.
Further, investigations are being carried out regarding information gathering and development ofeven more effective energy conservation handbooks to supplement the tools described above, andrequests are being made for the provision of the electronic data versions of the various handbooks
possessed by each ASEAN country.
(3) In order that existing implementing organizations can be widely utilized by ASEAN-related
persons, we are intending to begin trial use of an implementing organization and customer

II-2

searching system (ASEAN Energy Management Service), but are not making much progress. In
addition to making wider calls for participation, we are currently requesting increase in thenumber of registrations of implementing organization in each country.
(4) Working towards the construction of the Step-2 System which began from fiscal year 2009, thefunctions that should be additionally added, together with the programs and tools required bythese functions, will be investigated based on an evaluation of the operations of the Step-1 System.
Investigation has already been carried out to develop of a useful information supply system(e-Directory) including a directory of suppliers of energy conservation technology, machinery andequipment including the JASE-World technology collection that summarizes Japanese energy
conserving technologies, with the aim of developing tools such as Technical Handbooks forproviding information to businesses and mediating between business developments.
(5) Based on the results of implementing the activities described above, improvement of the ASEAN
Energy Management System plan should be considered, and reviewed if necessary.
(6) In order that the ASEAN Energy Management System can be utilized by as many related people
as possible while increasing the number of cooperators for operating the system, activities will be
continued to expand the ASEAN Network of Cooperators.
Table II-1-1 ASEAN Award Best Practice in Energy Management Awards and Applications
Conditions
1st Award

2nd Award 3rd Award 4th Award 5th Award Cumulative

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
Countries

Number

6

7

8

7

7

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

11

8

8

8

8

43

0

0

0

5

6

32

Buildings (SM)

2

6

8

SpecialSubmission (Ind.)

3

4

7

SpecialSubmission (Build.)

0

0

0

18

24

90

Year
Industries (L)Industries (SM)
Buildings (L)

Total

5

16

7

9

15

17

II-3

35

系列1
No. of Application
No. of Award
系列2

ASEAN EM Application & Award 2006-201025

No. of Application & Award

20

15

10

5

0

u
Br

ne

i

dia
bo
m
Ca

In

ne
do

sia
o
La

R
PD
M

ia
ys
ala

r
ma
n
ya
M

Ph

i ne
iil pp

s

e
or
ap
g
n
Si

d
an
ail
h
T

Country

Fig. II-1-3: Number of Applications and Number of Awards for Each Country

II-4

et
Vi

m
na

II-2. Implementation Plan for FY2011-FY2012
Activities were planned following the basic plan for constructing and operating the ASEAN Energy
Management System described in the previous section. The implementation plan was finalized at the
Inception Workshop that was held in July 2011, and agreement was reached with thegovernment-related persons from each of the ASEAN countries.
In the current fiscal year also, submissions of activity proposals have been received from each country
following the fiscal year 2011 basic implementation plan that was agreed at the fiscal year 2010 Post
Workshop held in mid-February 2011. Based on each of these proposals, ECCJ created an
implementation plan proposal, which was discussed at the Inception Workshop. Regarding this project,
local activity implementation proposals were submitted from seven countries, excluding thePhilippines, Singapore, and Cambodia, and as a result of discussions conducted to narrow down thecandidates, it was planned to carry out activities in four of the seven countries consisting of Myanmar,
Malaysia, Lao PDR, and Thailand (listed in order of implementation).
The priority activities in the current fiscal year are as described below.
1. ASEAN Energy Management System: Completion of building the Step-1 System, and continued
operation♣ Construction of Information Supply Functions and Start of Operations(1) Continuation of the gathering and dissemination of the Best Practices in Energy Management:
Holding of 5th Energy Awards
a. Smooth operation and improvement of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practice in Energy
Management for Industries and Buildings
b. Improvement of the system for sharing the awarded case informationc. Improvement of operation methods in order to collect a wider range of better cases(2) Development of energy management tools and establishment of systematic usage guidelines
a. Finalization of the ASEAN Energy Management Handbook (Reflecting the results of its
introduction and usage in factories and buildings)
b. Establishment of policies for effectively utilizing the Handbook described above and theTechnical Directory and In-house Database prepared by the Major Industries and Buildings
Projects.
c. Investigation of collecting and preparing Technical Handbooks to supplement the above.
♣ Development of Energy Audit and Training Service Functions(1) In order to promote the utilization by existing implementing organizations (including ESCO
businesses), start a trial operation of the implementing organization and customer searchingsystem (ASEAN Energy Management Service).
♣ Expansion of the ASEAN Network of Cooperators(1) Through holding Seminar-Workshops and advisory visit of various groups and companies, request
activity introductions and cooperation and participation in activities.
2. ASEAN Energy Management System: Investigation of Building the Step-2 System
3. Based on the results of the above activities, review the ASEAN Energy Management System plan
In order to realize the targets described above, the following types of activities will be implemented.
1. Implementation of Intensive Seminar-Workshops in ASEAN countries
The purposes of holding the Intensive Seminar-Workshops are to introduce the PROMEEC Projects

II-5including the Energy Management Project, to introduce and analyze the awarded results of the 5th
ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industries and Building, tointroduce and discuss the functions and programs that should be fully provided in the ASEAN Energy
Management System, and to disseminate these programs and tools. During this session, JASE-World
activity and its Technical Directory were introduced widely, and certain level of infrastructure for thosebusiness was formulated. Additionally in the current fiscal year, acting in unison with the APAEC
energy conservation-related activities, Awareness & Financing was again adopted as Session 3 in acontinuation of the previous fiscal year. In this session, as well as reporting the situation in the
countries visited, introductions were given to those situations from Japan and contents common to
ASEAN countries. In addition, the electricity-saving measures due to the great earthquake and nuclear
accident that occurred in Japan during the current fiscal year were also introduced.
2. Training to utilize the ASEAN Energy Management Handbook
The contents of the ASEAN Energy Management Handbook were carefully introduced, and in orderthat the host country participants should thoroughly understand and be aware of the contents, thetraining was reviewed and carried out in to spend the whole morning of the second day for giving
explanations. Then in the afternoon, one case study from each of the Industries and Buildings sectors
was selected by the host country from among the cases from their country that had received awards inthe recent ASEAN Award System of Best Practice in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings,
and these were distributed to the participants as case study research materials. Discussions were thencarried out among the participants forming Small Group Activities (SGA) to analyze the case studies
following the 11 Key Steps in the “Key Step Approach” that is a major theme in the Energy
Management Handbook, and the results of these discussions were presented by the participants.
3.Advisory Visits to Companies and Related Organizations
After implementing the Intensive Seminar-Workshops and the Training utilizing the ASEAN Energy
Management Handbook, advisory visits for companies are carried out for the following purposes(Approximately two locations in each country)(1) Giving of advice and exchanging of opinions regarding energy conservation activities in factories
and buildings wishing to newly introduce the ASEAN Energy Management Handbook. This
includes energy conservation promotion, understanding of the condition of the energy management
system, and giving advice to problems .
(2) Making requests for utilization of the ASEAN Energy Management System, and participation in
the activities. Also giving an introduction to the ASEAN Award System of Best Practice in Energy
Management for Industries and Buildings system, and if possible making requests to obtain
submission of applications.
4. Activities for Operating the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for
Industries and Buildings
The following activities are to be implemented to make improvements in the awarded case study
selection and evaluation standards of the 5th Awards ceremony of the ASEAN Award System of Best
Practices in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings.
(1) Participation in the Meeting of the Board of Judges
Participating as an observer with the judging committee (officially known as the Board of Judges(BOJ)) in the evaluation of the submitted applications and selection of awarded cases.

II-6

(2) Requesting Submissions of Applications for the 6th Energy Awards
Based on an analysis of the 5th Energy Awards cases, activities will be continued to encourage
submissions for the 6th Energy Awards with the aim of further expanding the participatingcompanies, such as by improving the evaluation standards.
5. Holding of the Research Forum in JapanThe Research Forum in Japan was put off in the current fiscal year partly due to less necessity to hold.
It invites the BOJ judging committee from the ASEAN countries with the following purposes.
(1) Research of improvement guidelines for PROMEEC Phase-3 of the ASEAN Energy Management
System(2) Research toward improving the operation method of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices
in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings, including the evaluation standards(3) Visits and interchanges with Best Practice case companies
6. Various Investigations, and Tool Creation
The preparation of the above activities on the Japan and ASEAN sides, the investigation of the plans
through analyzing the implementation results, and the creation and preparation of various tools
including the Energy Management Handbook will be continuously carried out.
The above activity plan and implementation schedule are shown in Table II-2-1.

II-7

Project / Activities
April

May

June

July

2011
2012
August September October November December January February(Overall）
A. Development of Detailed Project Plans / Preparatory Work
B. Contract with ACE
C. Preparation to Start Projects
D. Inception Workshop
E. Implantation of Projects
F. Post Workshop
G. Preparation of Report（3-Project Management）

MTPEC 12
(11/9-16)(1) Planning / Preparation / Evaluation(2) Coordination Meeting in Indonesia or Japan(3) Inception Workshop(4) Post Workshop

3. Project (Energy Management)(1) Develop Detailed Plan / Arrange for Site Activity /(2) BOJ for Award System (Energy Management)(3) 1st Site Activities (Intensive Seminar-Workshop / Visits
to Companies)(4) 2nd Site Activities (Intensive Seminar-Workshop / Visits
to Companies)(5) Operation of ASEAN Award System / Establishment of
ASEAN EM System(6) 3rd Site Activity (Summary&Post Workshop)(7) Preparation of Report*(Ceremony)

1st Local
Activities(10/23-11/3)

Table II-2-1: Fiscal Year 2011 Implementation Plan

II-8

2nd Local
Activities(1/11-1/18)

March

III. Activities in Each Country (Intensive Seminar-Workshops, Training, and Advisory Visits toCompanies)
III-1. Overview
As planned, four countries consisting of Myanmar, Malaysia, Lao PDR, and Thailand were visited,
and local activities were implemented. With the exception of Thailand, the content of the visit to eachcountry lasted for a three-day period. The first day consisted of the Intensive Seminar-Workshop,
while the second day gave training in the utilization of the Energy Management Handbook. On thethird day, advisory visits were made to factories and buildings willing to introduce the Energy
Management Handbook to their energy conservation activities, and advice and exchanges of opinion
were carried out regarding the activities.
It was planned that Myanmar and Malaysia would be visited during the first dispatch in October 2011,
while Lao PDR and Thailand were initially to be visited during the second dispatch in November.
However, due to the effect of the torrential rain that fell in the northern part of Bangkok in Thailand
causing disastrous flooding to the north of Bangkok and in the city center over a long period, theperiod of the activities were postponed together with those of Lao PDR to January 2012.
In the current fiscal year there were also many participants in the Intensive Seminar-Workshops from awide range of organizations, including government-related groups, implementing organizations,industry groups, companies, and universities, and the total number of participants was 128 persons. In
addition, a maximum of two companies or related organizations were visited in each country, making a
total of four locations for the four countries mentioned above.
The Energy Management Handbook usage training also attracted the interest of many related persons,and 105 persons participated in the three countries where this one-day training was implemented. The
Q & A was very lively, and participants worked enthusiastically the group work.
An example Intensive Seminar-Workshop program is shown in Attached Materials III-2-1-1. The
Workshops generally consist of the following sessions.
Session 1: Outline and Achievements of the PROMEEC Projects, and the current fiscal year plan
Session 2: Functions and Programs of the ASEAN Energy Management System(1) Overview of the Latest ASEAN Energy Management System(2) Specific Functions and Programs- Results of the 5th ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industry
and Buildings- Analysis of the above results- Introduction of “the implementing organization and customer search system” (ASEAN Energy
Management Service to Utilize Existing Implementing Organizations)- Introduction to the JASE-World Technical Directory- Introductions to the tools for use in energy management
Session 3: Awareness and Financing
As described above, in the current fiscal year activities were carried out after changing the following
points from the previous configuration.
(1) In Session 3, the Training (Group Activities for improving energy management) had formerly
been carried out using ASEAN Energy Management Best Practice cases. However, because thiswas very similar to the case study implemented on the second day, the activities were reviewed
and became unified and concentrated for the second day. Instead, reporting was carried out by

III-1

related persons on the theme of “Awareness and Financing”, which had been newly requested by
APAEC.
(2) As one part of the e-Directory, introductions to the JASE-World activities and its technology
collection were included to introduce Japanese energy conservation technologies.
In addition, on the second day, a Training program for utilizing the Energy Management Handbook
was held in the three countries. Example contents are shown in Attached Materials III-2-1-2. These
were made up of two sessions.
In particular, in the current fiscal year nearly three hours were allotted once again to giving a key point
explanation of the Energy Management Handbook to achieve full awareness.
Session 1: Seminar(1) Detailed explanation of the Energy Management Handbook
Session 2: Workshop: Case study research using Small Group Activities(1) Outline introduction to ASEAN Award Best Practice cases selected by the host country as casestudies(2) Group Work- Discussion: Improvement Proposals utilizing the Energy Management Handbook- Presentation of investigation results, discussions, and exchanges of opinions
In addition, after carrying out the Intensive Seminar-Workshop and the Training utilizing the Energy
Management Handbook in all three countries, company visits and hearings were implemented
concerning the Energy Management Handbook usage activity situation in the companies, anddiscussions were held. The above activities were carried out through the efforts of the related persons
from each country including the Focal Points and the relevant persons in the ASEAN Centre forEnergy, and the activities could be implemented smoothly according to plan. As a result, it waspossible to achieve the following outcomes.
(1) Also in the current fiscal year, many participants from each country and almost all the companies
and various related organizations expressed interest in the project and in the ASEAN Energy
Management System program. In addition to receiving assessment that these energy conservation
activities are effective, we could gain confirmation that participants actually wished to take part.
(2) Energy Management Best Practice cases in the ASEAN Energy Management System were widelycollected from each country, and the Awards System, which has already been held four times
since its introduction as a program to achieve dissemination in the ASEAN region, is attracting
even greater attention and anticipation. It was possible to promote the creation of the foundations
for the Awards System, including making improvements from an operations point of view, inorder that even more companies will be encouraged to continue submitting applications in the
future.
(3) The Energy Management Handbook includes specific activity guidelines that enable promotion ofenergy conservation. By using these guidelines in Group Activities using specific cases, it waspossible for the participants to experience the usefulness of the guidelines. Brunei Darussalam has
expressed its intention to develop its own version of the Handbook at the national level for use as
its energy management guidelines.
Further, the introduction and use of the Energy Management Handbook was implemented in fiveIII-2

pioneer companies and the results of these introductions were reflected, enabling the creation of ageneral-purpose ASEAN version that we are planning to disseminate in each country. Lao PDR,
which was visited last year, has also completed a local language version, while in Vietnam thetranslation to Vietnamese has been carried out by a pioneer company, and a request for translation
has also been raised in Myanmar and Cambodia, so we have supported them to translate.
(4) Including the companies that were also visited in the current fiscal year, it was possible to enlarge
the Network of Cooperators for this project. Since the start of this project in 2004, 121 companies(factories, buildings, ESCO companies, etc.), implementing organizations, government
institutions, universities and research institutes have been visited and investigated, and advice has
been given concerning their activities.
In addition, in all three countries, companies and factories were also visited, and we could confirm thatthey understood the usefulness of the tools for energy management such as the Energy Management
Handbook, together with the fact that the PROMEEC activities are implemented every year, realizing
large results. At the same time, we also called for their participation through submitting applications
for the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings.
Detailed explanations of the actual activities carried out in each country are given below.
III-2. Activities and Implementation Results in Each CountryIII-2-1. Myanmar
The Intensive Seminar-Workshop and Training was carried out at the same hotel of last year, theAmara Hotel, in Myanmar’s new capital city, Nay Pyi Taw, and the venue was the new Fantastic
Room. Nay Pyi Taw is an administrative city that has been developed in a location approximately 400
km north of the former capital city, Yangon. There are only a few flights between the two cities which
are utilized by persons related to the military and the government, and even though there is a railway it
is apparently inconvenient, so normally cars or buses afre used for transport.
1. Intensive Seminar-Workshop
The program of the Intensive Seminar-Workshop on the first day is shown in Attached Materials
III-2-1-1.
(1) Greetings: Welcoming addresses were made to the cooperating organizations by the Deputy
Minister of MOI (2) Mr. Myo Aung, Director General of MOE Mr. Htin Aung, ECCJ’s Mr.
Yutaka Ogura, and ACE’s Mr. Pham Van Duong, and the significance of energy conservation
promotion and the PROMEEC/EM project and its activities and developments in the futurewere introduced. An overview of each greeting is shown below.
<1> Mr. Myo Aung expressed appreciation for the continued financial and technical support
from Japan, and spoke about the importance and attractions of energy conservation, its
contribution to cost reductions, the importance of popularizing the Energy Management
Handbook (EHMB), and the introduction of the ASEAN Award Best Practices.
<2> Mr. Htin Aung expressed appreciation to the related persons and organizations including
METI, and spoke about the target to reduce energy consumption towards 2015 by 8%compared to 2005 in the EE&C of APAEC Program 4 and the human resource

III-3

development required to achieve this, together with the importance of the EMHB,
In-house Database, Technical Directory, benchmarks, guidelines, EM System, OJT
Energy Audit, ASEAN Award System, and MTPEC training.
<3> In the ECCJ greeting, gratitudes were particularly given for the aid given by eachcountry for the Great East Japan Earthquake and tidal wave which had occured earlier inthe year. Mention was made of the fact that much can be learned about large-scale
earthquakes and tidal waves from history, and that an introduction would be made laterto the points learned from the responses to the electricity shortage caused by the nuclear
power reactor accident this time. In addition, in this eighth year of the PROMEEC EM,
with Myanmar conducting its second EM project continuing from the previous year, arequest was made to Myanmar to work even more proactively for the Phase-3 activities.
<4> The greeting from ACE included mention of making energy security sustainable bydetermining targets, promoting energy efficiency, developing energy management tools,
and pointed out that the current year’s EM project would begin from Myanmar.
(2) Session 1: PROMEEC Projects/PROMEEC EM Project: Outline & Achievements Introduction
to the overall PROMEEC Project and the EM (Energy Management System Improvement)
Project<1> Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (Mr. Pham Van Duong, ACE):
Introduction to the EE&C activities in the APAEC 2010-2015 Program, to the activity
situation and number of participants until now in the three PROMEEC Projects, and to
the activities in the current year.
<2> Outline and Plan of the PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (Mr. Yutaka Ogura,
ECCJ): Introduction to the EM Project of current year project plan
<3> Realized Activities/Outstanding Improvement through PROMEEC Projects in Myanmar(Mr. Than Oo, Ministry of Industry No.2): Explanation that there are nine ministries
related to energy policies and energy (Ministry of Energy: Petroleum and gas; Ministryof Electricity No.1: Gas and hydroelectric power generation; Ministry of Electricity
No.2: Power transmission; Ministry of Mines: Coal; Ministry of Environmental
Conservation & Forestry and Ministry of Agriculture: Biomass and wood fuels;
Ministry of Industry No.2: Energy conservation and renewable energy; Ministry of
Science and Technology: Renewable energy; Ministry of Construction: Building energy
conservation). The Ministry of Energy is positioned as the coordinator. Barriers andresolution directions, PROMEEC Projects previously implemented, and the numbers ofparticipants were explained.
(3) Session 2: Introductions to the Functions and Programs of the ASEAN Energy Management
System<1> Outline of the Updated ASEAN Energy Management System (Mr. Yutaka Ogura,
ECCJ): Introduction to the issues and items to be undertaken in the system in the current
fiscal year, together with requests for the provision of application and information data.
<2> Specific Functions and Programs
A) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2010-2011 and Plan for 2011-2012 (Mr.
Pham Van Duong, ACE): Introduction to the details and judging results by the BOJ

III-4

of the 24 cases submitted in the EM sector this year, together with details of futureissues in the Buildings sector.
B) Information System- Information Analyses to Ease Dissemination of Awarded Cases (Mr. Yutaka Ogura,
ECCJ): Explanation of plan to extract and share characteristics that can be read fromthe current year’s application contents, and introduction to characteristics of theBest Practice cases in the three sectors.
- Introduction of JASE-World (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ): In relation to thee-Directory for Technologies & Equipment, introduction to JASE-World and to themethods of utilizing the technology collection.
C) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook (EMHB) and Other Tools (Mr. Yutaka Ogura,
ECCJ): Introduction to the EMHB and related thermal and electrical technicalhandbooks, together with the versions in each country, and the EE&C Manuals thatare being prepared in each ASEAN country.
- Updates on the Development of PROMEEC EM Tools:
A. Technical Directory (TD) for Industries and Buildings
B. In-house Database (IHDB) for Industries and Buildings
C. ASEAN Energy Management Service to Utilize the Existing Implementing
Organizations (Mr. Pham Van Duong, ACE):
Introduction to the TD types, cases, access methods, IHDB separate industry andbuilding types and activity situation, revised and corrected cases, introduction to the
ASEAN Energy Management Service and request for participation and usage, andintroduction to registrations which currently consist of 17 institutions registered as
implementing organizations.
D) Harmonization of ISO 50001 and EMHB (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ): While
explaining an overview of ISO 50001 (Energy Management) that was establishedand published in June of the current year, a comparison was given with theframeworks of EMHB, AEMAS, and the Japanese Act on the Rational Use ofEnergy. In addition to having many similar points, the practicality using the EMHBKey Step Approach and the superiority of the two-way Top-down & Bottom-up
activity observance was also conveyed, and it was explained that ISO 50001 shouldbe easily acquired if it is based on the EMHB.
(4) Session 3: Awareness and Financing<1> Situation of Awareness Raising (Mr. Than Oo, Ministry of Industry No.2): While
explaining about awareness-raising examples of seminars held particularly from 2009 to2011 in the PROMEEC Industries Project and Energy Management Project, and involuntary seminars held by the Myanmar Ministry of Industry No.2, he confirmed theimportant positioning of the PROMEEC Project.
<2> Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System in Japan (Mr.
Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ): Introduction to the activities relating to awareness-raising such as
the Eco-point System and Top Runner Program held as energy conservation measures inJapan originating from the global warming overall situation and resource exhaustion
problems, and explanation of the Japanese energy conservation financial assistanceIII-5

system and the JICA Two-Step Loan.
<3> Financial Support System in ASEAN (Mr. Pham Van Duong, ACE): Introduction using
tables of the potential funding sources in the main ASEAN countries.
<4> Japanese Experience of Energy Saving after Huge Disaster (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ):
Introduction to the details and results of electricity-saving measures implemented inTokyo due to the Great East Japan Earthquake, including the results of measures
implemented by ECCJ and in his home.
(5) Q&As<1> The current year’s Best Practice cases include the case of Toshiba Information, but isn’t
this a case of a Japanese company rather than a Philippines company? Why is a Japanesecompany being awarded at the ASEAN Awards? What are the policies of the Awards? ->As long as the company is from an ASEAN country, we make no special distinctions. In
addition, the purpose of the Awards is not the competition itself, but to study the good
points of the Best Practices.
<2> You kindly introduced many methods including the TEM HB, EMHB, and ISO 50001,
but which do you recommend? -> Although each method has its own characteristics, wewould first recommend that you master the contents of the EMHB as the most practicalmethod. As we explained, because there are many similarities with ISO 50001,
application will be easy.
<3> Training using products will also be effective, and we would like you to consider this in
the future. (Comment base) -> The person making the comment was hoping for a facility
such as the Mini-plant Training Facility in Thailand. Since Myanmar is close to Thailand,
if necessary the Thai facilities could be used, as was done by Lao PDR, and wesuggested during the coffee break that they should discuss this with DEDE through theFP.
<4> Why is the EM System important? -> In energy conservation activities, energy
management (EM) forms the basis. Mastering the ways of thinking and the methods will
create a system that will allow the continuous implementation of energy conservation
activities. Without adequately investigating by yourselves, simply accepting advice andcapital resources, the installation of high-efficiency energy conservation facilities andrealizing of energy-conserving results is a temporary phenomenon, so if you do notappreciate the importance and worth of energy conservation for yourself, you will tend
to forget.
<5> How is it possible to access the In-house Database? -> From the ACE website.
<6> Regarding ASEAN financial support, can you let us know the contact numbers ofpotential fund sources? -> Although we don’t have the direct contact numbers, if you
make a request through your FP, we will make investigations (ACE).
<7> How was it possible to raise awareness in Japan? -> Particularly due to the two oil crises,
for a country like Japan with limited natural resources, ways to limit energy
consumption to maintain and improve the international competitive strength of
manufacturing costs became issues both for each company and for the country. In
addition to establishing the Act on the Rational Use of Energy and thoroughly
implementing energy management at the country level, energy conservation was
voluntarily pursued at the company level, realizing a large effect. Through these actions,III-6

awareness was also improved.
<8> (Relating to the electricity-saving measures following the Great East Japan Earthquake)
Why does Japan have two zones with 50 Hz and 60 Hz frequencies, and isn’t it possible
to mutually accommodate these zones? -> The introduction of two frequencies took
place more than 100 years ago due to the introduction of different electricity generating
technologies from Germany and the US in the Kanto (East Japan) and Kansai (WestJapan) regions, creating two zones of 50 Hz and 60 Hz that have remained separate until
the present day. Although mutual conversion is possible, a large capacity is required forthe transformers, which are insufficient for large-scale accommodation.
<9> Have any changes been made to the Action Plans before and after the earthquake andtidal wave disaster? -> Although the energy conservation and electricity-saving measuresthat were carried out over the summer mostly ended in September, some of thesemeasures are being continued and electricity shortage is also anticipated in the winter as
well, so it is planned to implement similar measures. In addition, peoples’ lifestyle has
also been changed.
(6) Details of participants<1> Ministry of Industry No.2: 8 persons (Excluding the 3 women undertaking the reception
and moderator)<2> Ministry of Energy: 2 persons<3> Ministry of Science and Technology: 2 persons<4> Ministry of Industry No.1: 2 persons<5> Ministry of Electricity No.1: 2 persons<6> Ministry of Electricity No.2: 2 persons<7> Ministry of Environmental Conservation and Forestry: 2 persons<8> Ministry of Agriculture: 2 persons<9> Myanmar Engineering Society: 2 persons<10> Myanmar Industry Association: 2 persons (Out of these, one person was the presidentof company <11>)<11> Earth Industrial (Myanmar) Co., Ltd: 4 persons (Company was subject to the Advisory
Visit on October 28)<12> Fame Pharmaceuticals: 1 person<13> ACE: 1 person<14> ECCJ: 2 persons(7) Responses and Issues at the ISW, etc.
<1> Preparations and implementation were excellent. Most of the participants were fromenergy conservation-related ministries, but some non-governmental persons kindly
participated from faraway Yangon, and it can be thought that the energy management
methods and the Handbook are being steadily disseminated. In addition, because theEnergy Management Handbook (only the English version) was distributed to all theparticipants, we can expect that it will be utilized. However, in order to become more
widely disseminated, there is still a requirement to translate it to the local language.
Actually after this, ther support for translation was rapidly progressed and completed inthis fiscal year.

III-7

<2> The Ministry of Industry No.2 has also independently started conducting energy
management such as by holding energy conservation seminars, so it can be expected thatthey will plan to conduct dissemination developments in cooperation with related
ministries in the future.
2. Training related to Methods of Utilizing the Energy Management Handbook
It had been explained on the previous day that the second day corresponded with a special holiday in
Myanmar, so we had been concerned that this would mean the number of participants would be greatly
reduced from the first day. However, we were relieved to find that the resulting number of participants
was even more than on the first day.
There were 32 participants (excluding the representatives from ECCJ and ACE and several persons
from the host organization, the Ministry of Industry No.2), and all the persons participated from thelectures in the morning until the Workshop in the afternoon. We had thought possibly several persons
would leave in the afternoon, but this did not happen. By grouping the number of participants, threegroups were formed for the Group Work activities on this day.
From the previous fiscal year (also taking into account the fact that the PROMEEC (EM) Program hasentered Phase-3), the contents of the second day had been changed as described below.
<1> In the morning, the explanation of the In-house Database and Technical Directory that wasformerly carried out was omitted (since a summary explanation was given during the Seminaron the first day), and time was spent to an explanation of the Energy Management Handbook.
<2> Formerly, the Energy Management Handbook was explained almost page-by-page, but since
the actual book was separately distributed, the key points were explained by showing
PowerPoint slides..
<3> Group Work was the main activity of the afternoon. The Group Work that was formerly carriedout on the first day was discontinued and concentrated on the second day.
In the case of Myanmar, although there was a certain period of time before the previous fiscal year, theTraining on the second day was highly successful, realizing results that were better than expected. In
this fiscal year due to the deliberate preparations by Mr. Than Oo, even greater progress was seen as
described below.
<1> The number of participants in the Training Session increased even further from the previous
fiscal year. This is most probably due to Mr. Than Oo making sufficient efforts to contact
potential participants beforehand, and some participants have taken part after hearing about thefavorable results from the previous year.
<2> In addition to the copies of the PowerPoint presentation materials, copies of the actual Energy
Management Handbook were also distributed to all participants, allowing them deeper
understanding.
<3> The two cases for the Group Work were quickly decided and copies were prepared. In addition,
two of the participants were assigned the role of explaining the case study details.
<4> This year, Mr. Than Oo did not join in the Group Work itself, and adopted the position of
offering overall guidance. However, the other participants from theMinistry of Industry No.2
adequately participated in the lively discussions and summarizing.
Although the characteristics of the current fiscal year are as described above, the details (Program) of
the Training that was actually implemented are shown in Attached Materials III-2-1-2.
The following describes the results of implementing each item on the day.

III-8

(1) Lecture: A lecture was given relating to the overview and characteristics of the Energy
Management Handbook and its detailed contents and key guidelines by Mr. Ogawa.
All the participants enthusiastically listened to the explanation, and the Q&A just after was asfollows.
Question: “Although I understood about energy management using energy intensity, in thefactory where I work we are manufacturing a total of three types of machines. In thissituation, I think it’s difficult to know what to select as the denominator for the
manufacturing amount, so can you give me some advice?”
Answer: “That is a good question. As you say, in the situation of manufacturing multiple
product types instead of a single product, the calculation of energy intensity is difficult.
In this situation, the calculation method will depend on the actual manufacturingsituation. That is, taking an example where the time for manufacturing one product iscomparatively long at two days, figures during this time can be used for calculation.
Further, in the situation where manufacturing of three product types are always carriedout, if the average ratios do not change by much the method of calculating by using thecommon overall production amount (for example in tons) over a long period canprobably be used. In this situation, the workers or operators carrying out the work on
the front line know best about the actual on-site production situation, so which index
would be best to use for managing and controlling the energy would be a good topic of
their Small Group Activities.
(2) Workshop (Group Activities): Group Activity Guidance (Mr. Fumio Ogawa)<1> Introduction to the energy conservation actions incorporated in the case studies of the following
two companies that were awarded in the current fiscal year’s ASEAN Awards.
A) Green Energy Office (GEO) (Building Best Practice case from Malaysia)
B) Glaxo Wellcome Manufacturing Pte. (GWM) (Factory Best Practice case from Singapore)For both cases, Mr. Kyaw Swe Lin (Deputy GM, Ministry of Agriculture) and Mr. Myint Soe(Assistant Director, Ministry of Industry No.2) kindly gave detailed explanations. We wereparticularly surprised that they gave outstanding explanations using PowerPoint considering of
the fact that they were told to prepare these presentations just previous day by Mr. Than Oo.
<2> Group Work Experience
As described above, in the case of Myanmar, practically this was the second Group Work. At thestart of the Group Work, an explanation was given by ECCJ of the basic facts. The analysis andassessment of cases were to use the Energy Management Handbook for the standards as far as
possible, and discussions were held regarding whether the necessary items had been implemented
without omissions.
Discussions were summarized and the following items were finally presented (as in the past).
A) Good points of the energy conservation activities based on the contents introduced above,andB) Advice on improvement plans that could be implemented in the future.
The participants were divided into three groups according to the number of participants. The
number of persons in each group and the selected cases were as follows.
Group No.
No. of Members
Selected Case Study

III-9

1
2
3

10 persons
11 persons
11 persons

GEO
GEO
GWM

Although the time for discussions was only one and a half hours, each group discussed the main
points well, and prepared the summary and presentation. Although a whiteboard was provided foreach group to use in the discussions and presentation, all the groups used PCs to adequately
summarize the key points in PowerPoint and give the presentation. The high capabilities of theparticipants were proved. The presenter of each group was as shown below.
Group 1: Mr. Myo Zarni Win (Central Research Development Center)
Group 2: Mr. Min Lwin Thein (Ministry of Electricity No.1)
Group 3: Dr. Khin Mg Latt (Ministry of Science and Technology)
Each group faithfully followed the Key Step Approach of the Energy Management Handbook toarrange the contents of each case study, which was highly outstanding. Although there weredifferences in some detailed points, each group devoted themselves to devising methods ofarranging and announcing the cases.
<3> Comments from ECCJ Experts
The comments from ECCJ are summarized as follows.
- Despite the fact that the participants had little experience in Group Work, we were deeply
impressed by the substantial discussions with participation by all members and theappropriateness of the content summarization and presentation. Although the time was also
limited, the fact that the participants skillfully incorporated the content into PowerPoint
materials was very good. In addition, we were also impressed by how outstanding the previous
explanations of both cases were.
- We were highly encouraged by confirming the fact that the EM Handbook methodology,
particularly of the Key Step Approach which was explained in the morning on the day, had been
well assimilated and was in a condition to be utilized.
- Although the participants on the day were mainly persons from government agencies, each
person will eventually reach a position of giving guidance to the private sectors in the future. We
hope that participants will be able to spread this methodology to realize good results.
Concerning the SGA, we believe that it will be effective if the participants can hold this type ofWorkshop and give guidance in Group Work.
- In the explanation of the ASEAN Energy Management Service given on the previous day, theMyanmar Engineering Society was the only registered Service Provider from Myanmar.
Because we became aware this time that there are other capable companies, we would verymuch like for these companies to become registered (following discussions with the Focal
Point).
- Concerning the translation of the ASEAN Energy Management Handbook to the Myanmar
language, we also would like to positively investigate the possibility.
(3) Comments from ACE
Comments were given including thanks by Mr. Pham Van Duong.
(4) Comments from the Host Country
Mr. Than Oo gave an explanation and greetings expressing thanks to METI, ECCJ, and theIII-10participants, and spoke to encourage the participants to maintain close contacts among each otherwhen carrying out all duties, not just in energy conservation activities, and also explained about theawarding of certificates. There was a request to receive a list of the contact numbers of theparticipants this time, and Mr. Than Oo promised that this would be distributed.
(5) Comments from VIPs
Comments were received from the following three persons among the participants.
Mr. Htun Naing Aung (Myanmar Industry Association)- As I will be required to convey the information to other persons, it is very effective as in thisSeminar to be able to ask questions directly to the ECCJ experts. Wouldn’t it be good toinvestigate holding this kind of Seminar in Yangon and Mandalay instead of just in Nay Pyi
Taw?
- I believe that it is very important that the participants of this workshop keep in mutual contact
and assist each other in the common purpose of energy management.
Mr. Tin Htut (Director, Ministry of Energy)- The above proposal would involve several ministries (at least the Ministry of Industry No.2
and the Ministry of Energy), so that it would not be easy to implement, but I will report it to
my superiors and conduct investigations.
Mrs. Khaing Zaw (Myanmar Industry Association, and the president of the company whose
factory was to be visited on the 28th.)- Expression of greetings including words of thanks and the intention to implement energy
management.
(6) Awarding of Certificates and Close of Meeting
All the participants were divided into three, and certificates were presented by Mr. Yutaka Ogura,
Mr. Pham Van Duong, and Mr. Than Oo.
(7) Closing Remarks by Mr. Than Oo
Finally, remarks were given by the host, Mr. Than Oo, to close the entire Seminar. The detailed
contents were as described below.
- I am pleased that such a highly substantial Program could be accomplished thanks to METI,ECCJ, ACE, and all the participants today.
- The various tools of the ASEAN EM System, consisting of the TD, IHDB, EM Handbook and
ASEAN Energy Management System, are highly effective items. I think that all the participants
well understood the Seminar and Training held this time.
- Regarding the SGA Group Work, I was pleased to see how very well all the participants did.
- Concerning the proposal expressed this time of the idea of holding this type of Seminar more
widely in other locations, I will report this to my superiors and carry out investigations.

III-11

(8) Breakdown of Participants
The details of the 32 participants are as shown below, and as expected, participants related togovernment agencies were the majority. Further, because Mr. Than Oo was on the hostorganization side this time (also in the position of awarding the certificates), together with several
subordinates (including the female moderator) he did not participate in the Group Work.
<1> Ministry of Industry No. 2:9 persons<2> Ministry of Energy:2 persons<3> Ministry of Industry No. 1:2 persons<4> Ministry of Electricity No. 1:2 persons<5> Ministry of Electricity No. 2:1 person<6> Ministry of Science & Technology:2 persons<7> Ministry of Agriculture:2 persons<8> Ministry of Environment Conservation & Forestry:2 persons<9> Myanmar Engineering Society:2 persons<10> Myanmar Industry Association:2 persons<11> Private companies:6 persons
3. Company Visit
Based on the Intensive Seminar-Workshop and the Training regarding the usage of the Energy
Management Handbook held this time, Earth Industrial (Myanmar) Co., Ltd. was selected as one
company from the companies wishing to utilize the tools including the Energy Management Handbook
in their factory and building energy management activities and energy conservation promotion. This
company was visited and interchanges were carried out on October 28. For details, refer to Attached
Materials III-2-1-3.
(1) Earth Industrial (Myanmar) Co., Ltd.

III-12

Attached Materials III-2-1-1: Agenda of Myanmar Intensive Seminar-Workshop

AGENDA: Intensive Seminar-Workshop
Promotion Of Energy Efficiency And Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2011-2012
The Amara Hotel, Nay Pyi Taw
08:30 – 09:00
09:00 – 09:08
09:09 – 09:14
09:15 – 09:26
09:27 – 09:33
09.34 – 10:00
10:00 – 10:55
10:00 – 10:37

10:38 – 10:54
10:55 – 15:20
10:55 – 11:15
11:15 – 12:02

12:10 – 13:30
13:30 – 15:00

15:00 – 15:20
15:20 – 16:00
16:00 – 18:00
16:15 – 16:33
16:33 – 17:12
17:12 – 17:15
17:15 – 17:45
17:45 – 18:00

25 October, 2011

Registration
Welcome Address by Deputy Minister of MOI(2), U Myo Aung
Welcome Remarks by Director General of MOE, U Htin Aung
Opening Statement by The Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ)
Opening Statement by ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE)
COFFEE BREAK & GROUP PHOTO SESSION
Session 1 : PROMEEC Projects / PROMEEC EM Project: Outline & Achievements
Presentation by ACE & ECCJ
1) Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (ACE )2) Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (ECCJ)
Presentation by Host country
Realized Activities / Outstanding Improvement through PROMEEC Projects
Session 2 : “ASEAN Energy Management System”: Functions & Program
Presentation by ECCJ
Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System” (ECCJ)
Presentation by ECCJ and ACE
Specific Functions and Program
1) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of 5th ASEAN Awards for 2010-2011 and Plan for 2011-2012 (ACE)2) Information System- Information System to Disseminate Awarded Cases (ECCJ)LUNCH
2) Information System (Continued)- Introduction of JASE-World (ECCJ)
3) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook and other tools (ECCJ)- In-house Database for Industries and Buildings (ACE)- Technical Directory for Industries and Buildings (ACE)- ASEAN Energy Management Service to Utilize The Existing Implementing Organizations(ACE)- Harmonization of ISO 50001 and EMHB (ECCJ)
Q&A
COFFEE BREAK
Session 3 : Awareness1) Situation of Awareness Raising, U Than Oo, MOI-2, Host country2) Situation of Awareness Raising and Financial Support System in Japan (ECCJ)
3) Financial Support System in ASEAN (ACE )4) Japanese Experience of Energy Saving after huge Disaster (ECCJ)
Q&A
End of Intensive Seminar-Workshop

III-13

Attached Materials III-2-1-2: Agenda of Myanmar EMHB Training

AGENDA
Training: Utilization of “Energy Management Handbook and Tools for ASEAN”
Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2011-2012
The Amara Hotel, Nay Pyi Taw
08:30 – 09:00
Registration

26 October, 2011

09:00 – 12:30

Session 1: Seminar by ECCJ

09:05 – 10:30
10.30 - 10:45

Explanation by ECCJ:
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (part 1) (ECCJ)
COFFEE BREAK

10:45 – 12:20

Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (part 2)(ECCJ)

12:15 – 12:30

Q&A

12:30 – 13:30

LUNCH

13:30 – 17:10

Session 2: Workshop (Training for Small Group Activities) by Host Country/ECCJ

13:30 – 13:35

Guidance for Group Work by ( ECCJ)

13:35 – 13:55(Experience of Dissemination of ASEAN Award Best Practices of EM)
Brief Introduction of Best Practices /EM in Building by Host Country (Case 1)<2010-11 Best Practices /EM in Industry, 1st Runner-up: Glaxo Wellcome
Manufacturing PTE LTD, Singapore> (Participants)
Brief Introduction of Best Practices /EM in Industry by Host Country (Case 2)<201011Best Practices /EM in Building, 2nd Runner-Up: Green Energy Office(GEO),
Greentech Malaysia, Malaysia> (Participants)
Group Work Based on Cases Studies 1 & 2 by Host Country/ECCJ- Preparation for Group Work- Discussion by Groups:
Guideline and Basic Plan to Improve Using “Energy Management Handbook”
COFFEE BREAK

13:55 – 14:00

14:05 – 15:45

15.45 - 16:00
16:05 – 16:41
16:41 – 16:52

Presentation by Participants:
Results of Group Work for Cases Studies 1 & 2 (Participants)
Comments by ECCJ Experts and Host Country

16:52 – 17:08

Awarding Certificates

17:08 – 17:20

Closing Remarks by Mr. Than Oo, MOI-2
COMPLETION OF TRAINING

III-14

Attached Materials III-2-1-3: Advisory Visit
PROMEEC (Energy Management) Related Organization Visit: Myanmar (No. 1)
Visit to Earth Industrial (Myanmar) Co., Ltd.
(Document produced by Mr. Yutaka Ogura)
No. Item
Details
1
Date and Time October 28 (Friday) 09:30-13:00
2
3

Company
visited
Persons met

4

Accompanied
Persons(MOI-(2))

5

Visitors(ACE, ECCJ)

Earth Industrial (Myanmar) Co., Ltd.
- Ms. Ma Khine Zaw (President)- Mr. Kyaw Min (Director)- Ms Yin Nwe Myint (Director, Financial)- Mr. Myint Swe (Director, Electrical Power)- Ms. Tin Tin Aye (Factory Manager)- Mr. Aung Naing Win (Factory Manager, Electrical Power)- Mr. Saw Naing Soe (Quality Control Manager)- Mr. Min Kyaw Thu (Production Control Manager)- Mr. Saw Kler Moo (Manager, Production)- Ms. Than Than Myint (Project Engineer)- Mr. Thazin Shwe (Production Engineer)- Mr. Than Oo (Director, Central Research & Development Centre)- Mr. Myint Soe (Assistant Director, Directorate of Heavy Industries
Planning)- Ms. Yi Yi Khine (Assistant Director)- Mr. Pham Van Duong (ACE, Technical Expert)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (ECCJ, Technical Cooperation Department, General
Manager)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (ECCJ, Technical Cooperation Department, TechnicalExpert)

6. Overview of Visited Company by presentation and website(1) Established in 1997, 1600 employees, building site area 24 acres, sales US$4 million(2) Factory: Transformer Factory (Since April 1997), Thermal Cut-off (Fuse) Factory (Since July1999), PCB Assembly Factory(3) ISO 9001:2000 Acquisition: JQA of Japan also participated in the certification(4) Quality Policy: Total Customer Satisfaction(5) Group Mission: To Improve Productivity through Team Activities(6) Customers: There are also many Japanese companies including Oki Electric Industry, Toshiba
Corporation, Canon Corporation, and Kyocera Corporation(7) Employee training is actively implemented
7. Hearing and Discussion Details(1) Energy Conservation Activity Details: By presentation
1) On October 4, 2011, Mr. Than Oo of the Ministry of Industry No.2 visited the company andcarried out Awareness Training while providing the EMHB.
2) Transformer Factory: Improvement activities have been carried out since 2008. Due to theintroduction of a voltage stabilizer, the utilization of diesel was improved by 60%. The
introduction of solar security lighting from April 2011 saved 7,300 kWh/Y of electric power,
while the use of a capacitor bank from August 2011 improved the power factor from 0.8 to 0.95.

III-15

3)

4)

In addition, the energy conservation target from October to December 2011 was set to 5%. Theenergy consumption intensities of the products were converted to trend graphs, which showed areduction since 2009. The details of the energy consumption fields were also converted to graphs,
and were being well regulated. The energy units were not only shown in kWh, but as the otherfactory, frequently showed conversions to MJ. In the lighting coefficient, the ballast of the 768p
fluorescent lighting was changed from a magnetic type to an electric type, realizing electricity
saving of 29%. A person has been made responsible for switching off the lighting up to working
area 1-7.
Thermal Cut-off Factory: By changing the oven cart design, the process energy was improved by
35%. Security lights were changed to solar and LED types. An energy management Master Plan
was established for the period between October 2011 and March 2012, and the energy
conservation target was set to 15%. In this factory also, analysis was carried out of the changes inenergy consumption intensity and energy consumption fields. Note that since the energy
consumption percentage of the ovens used as dryers is high at 47%, investigation is being carriedout into how energy conservation can be planned. From October until March of the following year,
it is planned to exchange the 100p fluorescent lighting ballast from a magnetic type to an electric
type, and in the same way in this factory a person has been given responsibility for switching off
the lighting.
Incandescent lamps for the security lamp are being changed to LED lamps, and the showroom
fluorescent lighting is being changed to LED tubes.

(2) Explanations, Opinions, and Proposals made by ECCJ, including the On-site Inspections
1) The company’s energy conservation implemented actions were outstanding, based on the energy
management methods and the Energy Management Handbook. Policies, organizations, and targets
have also been set, energy data has been collected and changed into graphs, shown as intensities,
and converted to MJ. We were surprised to see how good the implemented activities were.
2) There were also displays relating to 5S and the seven types of waste. Rather than simply showing
displays, these were linked to the implementation of actual activities, and if improvements can berealized they will result in reward.
3) It is thought that these activities are due to the circumstances and experiences in acquiring ISO
9001.
4) In the Training Room, various types of standards and manuals were also available, and theEnglish PPT materials of persons who had participated in Japanese AOTS Training were filed andwere being used as texts. It appeared that education of new employees is being properly
implemented, and when we visited there were four employees receiving guidance.
5) Regarding the products in each factory, there was talk of how difficult it was to determine theenergy index for each, since the specifications were different and the process periods also differed.
However, we commented that as long as the transformers and fuses are summarized, it will not benecessary to develop energy indexes into further detail.
6) Based on the above points together with the results of the activities implemented until March ofnext year, if the contents were summarized they would probably become a good candidate toreceive an ASEAN Award, and we encouraged them to consider submission.
7) In addition, Mr. Than Oo also expressed the fact that he would support the preparation of a
proposal for an ASEAN Award as a start for Earth Industrial (Myanmar) Co., Ltd. to also apply to
become an ESCO company.

III-16

(3) Response of Visited Company
1) The female owner-president kindly supported the visit from start to finish, and we could wellappreciate her enthusiasm in carrying out the activities. Together with six of the company’s
executives, she also kindly attended the ISW and the Training at faraway Nay Pyi Taw on the
25th and 26th to positively learn as much as possible.
2) The total of more than 11 related persons including president, directors and factory chiefs, kindly
gave support with great attention, and their degree of interest was conveyed through their actions.
8. Overview of the On-site Inspections(1) Following the visit to the Transformer Factory, a visit was also made to the Thermal Cut-off
Factory.
(2) In both cases, many young female employees were working on several production lines inside thelarge factories silently assembling transformers and fuses using individual assembly and partly
assembly-line operation. Work is being carried out by labor-intensive method. Althoughmechanization and automation would result in a large reduction of employees, there was a feelingthat this was not yet desirable, and probably employment was to be initially secured. In theworking environment, it appeared that the air conditioning and lighting were not always
sufficient.
(3) Near the entrances and exits in the factory, many notices concerning quality policies, 5S and otheractivity examples, and the seven types of waste were posted on the walls in English and the
Myanmar language.

III-17

III-2-2. Malaysia
The implementation of this project in Malaysia was being carried out after a two-year break. Up till
the previous implementation, the Malaysian energy conservation institution, PTM (Malaysian Energy
Center) acted as the FP while also providing the core of the support. However, in response to theorganizational modification and change in name of the related Energy Ministry in January 2010, PTM
also underwent an organizational modification and name change. In addition, the FP for the ASEAN
PROMEEC activities also returned to be under the charge of the original Ministry of Energy, GreenTechnology and Water (MEGTW), who also kindly provided support this time.
The Intensive Seminar-Workshop and Training was implemented in the Corus Hotel, located rightbeside to the Kuala Lumpur City Center (KLCC) Twin Tower in the center of Kuala Lumpur City.
1. Intensive Seminar-Workshop
The program of the Intensive Seminar-Workshop on the first day is shown in Attached Materials
III-2-2-1.
(1) Welcoming remarks: Welcoming addresses were made to the cooperating organizations by Mr.
Badaruddin Mahyudin, Deputy Secretary General of MEGTW, Mr. Yutaka Ogura of ECCJ, and
Ms. Maureen Balamiento of ACE, and the significance of energy conservation promotion and
the PROMEEC/EM projects and their activities and developments in the future were introduced.
An overview of each greeting is shown below.
<1> Mr. B. Mahyudin: Against the background of climate change problems, Malaysia is aiming
to become a sustainable low-carbon society. While electric power consumption will
increase 3-4% from 2010 towards 2020, CO2 will be reduced by 40% in 2020 compared to
the levels in 2005. Malaysia also completed its Energy Master Plan in November 2010, andthe introduction of the AEMAS Energy Management System also began last year. We
would like to thank METI/ECCJ/ACE also from Malaysia’s energy security viewpoint forthe continued provision of the latest technology through the PROMEEC activities. In boththe private sector and public sector, the education of human resources is very important,and I hope for the success of this seminar.
<2> In the ECCJ greeting, thanks were particularly given for the aid given by each country for
the Great East Japan Earthquake and tidal wave which had occurred earlier in the year.
Mention was made of the fact that much can be learned about large-scale earthquakes andtidal waves from history, and that an introduction would be made later to points learned
from the responses to the electricity insufficiencies caused by the nuclear power station
accident this time. In addition, in this eighth year of the PROMEEC EM, a request wasmade for Malaysia to implement the Phase-3 activities with a more independent framework.
However, as this was the first EM project after the change of the Focal Point from PTM to
MEGTW, a request was made for participants to learn as much as possible. Further,mention was made that METI/ECCJ are giving cooperation in the development of
Malaysia’s Energy Conservation Law.
<3> From ACE, thanks were expressed to MEGTW, METI, and ECCJ. Mention was also madethat because ASEAN region economic growth is increasing, a continuous energy
development and capacity improvement plan is planned in APAEC 2010-2015, and arequest was made that participants utilize the Energy Management Handbook & Tools,

III-18

Technical Directory, In-house Database, ASEAN Award, and ASEAN Energy Management
Service from the PROMEEC Project which has reached its 12th year.
(2) Session 1: PROMEEC Projects/PROMEEC EM Project: Outline & Achievements; Introduction tothe overall PROMEEC Project and the EM (Energy Management System Improvement) Project<1> Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (Ms. Maureen Balamiento, ACE):
Introduction to the EE&C activities in the APAEC 2010-2015 Program, to the activity
situation and number of participants until now in the three PROMEEC Projects, and to theactivities in the current year.
<2> Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ):
Introduction of the EM Project in current year project plan
<3> Overview of Major Energy Efficiency Initiatives in Malaysia (Mr. Zaini Abdul Wahab,
MEGTW): Explanation regarding the National Energy Policy, National RE (Renewable
Energy) Policy, present laws, current developments in EE-related laws, AEMAS activities,
recent energy conservation-related government-determined issues, Green Building
demonstration cases, labeling and the SAVE Rebate Program (similar to the Eco-Point
System in Japan), financial incentives, implementation of NEEMP (National Energy
Efficiency Master Plan), and the establishment of the SEDA (Sustainable Energy
Development Authority) in September 2011.
(3) Session 2: Introductions to the Functions and Programs of the ASEAN Energy Management
System<1> Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System” (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ):
Introduction to the issues and items to be implemented in the system in the current fiscal
year, together with requests for the provision of application and information data.
<2> Specific Functions and Programs
1) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in EM for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2010-2011 and Plan for 2011-2012 (Ms.
Maureen Balamiento, ACE): Introduction to the details and judging results by the BOJof the 24 applications submitted in the EM sector this year, together with details of
future issues in the Buildings sector.
2) Information System- Information Analyses to Ease Dissemination of Awarded Cases (Mr. Yutaka Ogura,
ECCJ): Explanation of plan to extract and share characteristics that can be read from thecurrent year’s application contents, and introduction to characteristics of Best Practicecases in the three sectors.
- Introduction of JASE-World (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ): In relation to the e-Directoryfor Technologies & Equipment, introduction to JASE-World and to the methods ofutilizing the technical directory.
3) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook (EMHB) and Other Tools (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ):
Introduction to the EMHB and the related thermal and electrical technical handbooks,
together with the versions in each country, and the EE&C Manuals that are being
prepared in each ASEAN country.
- Updates on the Development of PROMEEC EM Tools:

III-19

A. Technical Directory (TD) for Industries and Buildings
B. In-house Database (IHDB) for Industries and Buildings
C. ASEAN Energy Management Service to Utilize The Existing Implementing Organizations(Ms. Maureen Balamiento, ACE): Introduction to the TD types and cases, accessmethods, IHDB by industry and buildings types and activity situation, revised andcorrected cases, introduction to the ASEAN Energy Management Service and request
for participation and usage, and introduction to registrations which currently comprise
17 institutions registered as implementing organizations.
D. Harmonization of ISO 50001 and EMHB (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ): While
explaining an overview of ISO 50001 (Energy Management) that was established andpublished in June of the current year, a comparison was given with the frameworks of
EMHB, AEMAS, and the Japanese Act on the Rational Use of Energy. In addition tohaving many similar points, the practicality using the EMHB Key Step Approach andthe superiority of the two-way Top-down & Bottom-up activity observance was also
conveyed, and it was explained that ISO 50001 should be easily acquired if it is basedon the EMHB.
(4) Session 3: Awareness and Financing<1> Situation of Awareness Raising of the host country: Because this was included in Mr. Zaini
Abdul Wahab’s previous explanation, it has been omitted here.
<2> Financial Support System in ASEAN (Ms. Maureen Balamiento, ACE): Introduction using
tables of the potential funding sources in the main ASEAN countries.
<3> Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System in Japan (Mr. Yutaka
Ogura, ECCJ): Introduction to the activities relating to awareness-raising such as the
Eco-point System and Top Runner Program held as energy conservation measures inJapan originating from the global warming overall situation and resource exhaustion
problems, and explanation of the Japanese energy conservation financial assistance systemand the JICA Two-Step Loan.
<4> Japanese Experience of Energy Saving after Huge Disaster (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ):
Introduction to the details and results of electricity-saving measures implemented inTokyo due to the Great East Japan Earthquake, including the results of measures
implemented by ECCJ and in his home.
(8) Q&As<1> What is the ASEAN Energy Management Service? -> Because this question was asked
after the initial PROMEEC introduction, a specific introduction to the contents had not yet
been given, and the purpose was explained by Ms. Maureen Balamiento.
(9) Breakdown of Participants: At the initial lecture of Mr. Yutaka Ogura, when we asked for details
about the parent organizations of the approximately 30 perticipants, we were told there were 3
persons from industry, 1 person from building, many people from universities and institutes, 3
persons from consulting, and 5 persons from government ministries. Details were clarified laterto the following.
<1> National University-related persons: 18 persons from 11 universities<2> Public Works Dept., Ministry of Works: 7 persons from 5 locations

III-20<3> ESCO Companies: 3 persons from 3 companies<4> Manufacturer (Semi-conductors): 1 person<5> Hotel persons: 1 person<6> Consultants: 3 persons<7> Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water: 7 persons<8> ACE: 1 person<9> ECCJ: 2 persons(10) Responses and Issues at the ISW, etc.
<1> While the preparations and implementation were excellent, we were surprised that morethan half of the participants were university-related. Apparently, the high-priority
promotion of energy management starting from government-related buildings resulted in
the dispatch of persons from major universities, who listened to the lectures with interest.
<2> When the participants were questioned before the first lecture by ECCJ, it was found thatthey had almost no knowledge of the projects and the vocabulary used in each of the
PROMEEC Projects, EMHB, MTPEC, 5S, and benchmarks.
<3> Note that because the persons related to the former PTM (currently the GreenTech Center)
were attending an AEMAS Training Course on this day, they could not attend the Seminar.
(When we visited the GreenTech Center on the third day, we found that AEMAS Training
had indeed been implemented for around 30 persons.)
2. Training of Utilizing the Energy Management Handbook
As described previously, this was the first seminar to be held since the host organization was changed
from the former PTM to the Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water (MEGTW, or KeTTHA
in the Malay language), and in addition, some of the participants were taking part for the first time.
However, all participants enthusiastically and earnestly listened to the lecture. The participants on thesecond day were also basically the same persons as on the first day. The number of participants(excluding the persons from ECCJ, ACE, and the six persons from the host organization Ministry ofEnergy, Green Technology and Water (KeTTHA)) was 31 persons. By the number of participants,
three groups were formed for the Group Work activities on this day.
As with the previously described Myanmar activity, the contents of the second day were as follows.
<1> In the morning, the explanation of the In-house Database and Technical Directory that wasformerly carried out was omitted (since a summary explanation was given during the seminaron the first day), and this time was given over to an explanation of the Energy Management
Handbook.
<2> Formerly, the Energy Management Handbook was explained almost page-by-page, but because
this book can be downloaded from the ACE and ECCJ websites, the explanation was given by
PowerPoint slides showing the key points.
<3> The afternoon was mainly spent for Group Work, and the Group Work that was formerly
carried out on the first day was discontinued and unified to the Group Work on the second day.
Recently in Malaysia the drafting of a new EE&C Law has started, but according to the Electrical
Energy Regulations that were previously established in 2008, buildings and factories consuming morethan a fixed amount of energy (3 million kWh in consecutive six months) must appoint an Electrical
Energy Manager. Government buildings have been targeted first (with the meaning of showing an

III-21

example?), and next many national universities will become subject to the regulations. This is thereason why many university and government-related persons participated this time. The next-largest
numbers of participants were from ESCO companies and consultants. In other words, this was the firsttime for most of the participants to take part in the Training. Accordingly, in consideration of thefollowing points, explanations of the Energy Management Handbook and Group Work were
implemented.
<1> Recognizing that there were people hearing the Energy Management Handbook explanation for
the first time, we restricted ourselves to carefully explain the basic items (including pastdevelopments).
<2> Among the items, we explained in detail about the core Key Step Approach methodology.
Further, in consideration of the timing, it was necessary to allocate enough time for giving acomparison with ISO 50001.
<3> The two cases for the Group Work were quickly decided and copies were prepared. In addition,
an opportunity was given to enable the participants to study the materials in advance.
<4> A considerable number of participants took part in the Group Work, and sufficiently active
training in the discussions and summarizing was realized.
Although the characteristics of the current fiscal year are as described above, the details (Program) of
the Training that was actually implemented are shown in Attached Materials III-2-2-2.
The following describes the results of implementing each item on the day.
(1) Lecture: A lecture was given relating to the overview and characteristics of the Energy
Management Handbook and its detailed contents and key guidelines by Mr. Ogawa.
All participants enthusiastically listened to the explanation. In particular, regarding the Key Step
Approach, a sheet of schematic figure was separately distributed and a detailed description wasgiven. The Q&A immediately afterwards was as follows.
Question: “Although I am working in a university, the appointment of an Energy Manager
following the New EE&C Act in future will not suit the situations. In these cases, theactivities afterwards will become difficult.”
Answer: (Given by Mr. Zaini Abdul Wahab of KeTTHA)“The government and laws only determine the fundamental policies. The actual
methods used afterwards should be determined using the own policies of individual
institutions. The appointment of Energy Managers is carried out by the newly
established SEDA (Sustainable Energy Development Authority of Malaysia), but if you
have any opinions regarding this, if you can submit them by document I will handle
them.”(2) Workshop (Group Activities): Group Activity Guidance (Mr. Fumio Ogawa)<1> Introduction to the energy conservation activities incorporated in the case studies of thefollowing two companies.
1) Green Energy Office (GEO) (Best Practice case from Malaysia)
2) Glaxo Wellcome Manufacturing Pte. (GWM) (Factory Best Practice case from Singapore)
Regarding both these cases, the moderator Mr. Zaini Abdul Wahab kindly gave summary
explanations.
<2> Group Work Experience
At the start of the Group Work, an explanation was given by ECCJ of the basic facts. The

III-22analysis and assessment of cases were to use the Energy Management Handbook for the
standards as far as possible, and discussions were held regarding whether the necessary items
had been implemented without omissions.
Discussions were summarized and the following items were finally presented (as in the past).
1) Good points of the energy conservation activities based on the contents introduced
above, and
2) Advice for improvement plans that could be implemented in the future.
The participants were divided into three groups according to the number of participants. The
number of persons in each group and the selected cases were as follows. The division into
groups was carried out by KeTTHA following the method of mixing people with different
backgrounds.
Group No.
No. of Persons
Selected Case1
12 persons
GEO
2
10 persons
GEO
3
9 persons
GWM
Although the time for discussions was only one and half hours, each group discussed the main
points well, and prepared the summary and presentation. All the groups used a PC toadequately summarize the key points in PowerPoint and give the presentation. We could
appreciate the high capabilities of the participants. The presenter of each group was as shown
below.
Group 1 Mr. Ghazali Talib (ESCO)
Group 2 Mr. Dain Saian (University)
Group 3 Mr. Faiz Bin Fadzil (KeTTHA)
Each group faithfully followed the Key Step Approach of the Energy Management Handbook
to arrange the contents of each case study, which was highly outstanding. However, Group 1
presentation had insufficient distinction between the good points and the advice for the futureparts, so guidance and instructions were given to them.
<3> Comments from ECCJ Experts
The comments from ECCJ are summarized as follows.
- We were deeply impressed by the substantial discussions with participation by all members
and the appropriateness of the content summarizing and presentation. Although the time wasalso limited, the fact that the participants skillfully incorporated the content into PowerPoint
materials was very good.
- We were highly encouraged to be able to confirm that the EM Handbook methodology,
particularly of the Key Step Approach which was explained in the morning on the day, hadbeen well assimilated and was in a condition where it could be utilized.
- Although the participants on the day were mainly persons from government agencies anduniversities, each person will eventually reach a position of giving guidance to the private
sectors in the future. We hope that participants will be able to spread this methodology torealize good results. Concerning the SGA, we believe that it will be effective if theparticipants can hold this type of Workshop and give guidance in Group Work.

III-23

(3) Comments from ACE
Comments were given including thanks by Ms. Maureen Balamiento.
(4) Comments from Host Country
The following comments were received from Mr. Zaini Abdul Wahab.
- All the participants were specially selected. Concerning the mailing of announcement of these
activities, the order of priority was considered. Although we approached government-building
related persons, university-related persons, and additionally persons from general companies, wewere forced to close the applications partway, due to limit of number of participants acceptable.
- In any event, it is necessary to implement the capacity building approach. The holding of theactivities this time is one part of this.
- In the future, KeTTHA intends to continue to provide assistance for EE&C promotion. We will
strive hard to implement activities.
(5) Comments by Participants
Although the contents of the activities in the two-day period were good this time, if I may express
a wish I believe we could have gained a deeper understanding if we had been given theopportunity to read the Energy Management Handbook beforehand.
(6) Awarding of Certificates
Because time was pressing due to limitations caused by the time of the flights for the faraway
participants to return home, the certificates were handed to the participants as they left the venue.
(7) Closing Remarks by Mr. Anbalagank
Finally, remarks were given by Mr. Anbalagank (Undersecretary, International Relations Division,
KeTTHA) representing the host, to close the entire Seminar. The detailed contents are as described
below.
- I am pleased that such a highly substantial Program could be accomplished thanks to METI,ECCJ, ACE, and all the participants today.
- The various tools of the ASEAN EM System, consisting of the TD, IHDB, EM Handbook and
ASEAN Energy Management System, are highly effective items. I think that all the participants
well understood the Seminar and Training held this time.
- Regarding the SGA Group Work, I was pleased to see how very well all the participants did.
- In Malaysia, activities including the EE&C legislation are anticipated in the future. I hope thatthe lessons learned today can be fully applied.
(8) Breakdown of Participants
The details of the 31 participants are as shown below. Participants related to government agencies
and from universities were the majority. Further, out of the seven persons from the hostorganization side (KeTTHA) this time, only Mr. Faiz Bin Fadzil participated in the Group Work.
<1> Ministry of Works, Public Work Department 7 persons<2> Universities (11 universities)
16 persons<3> ESCO
3 persons<4> Consultants
3 persons<5> Hotel
1 personIII-24

<6> Industry (Semiconductors)

1 person

4. Company Visits
Based on the Intensive Seminar-Workshop and the Training regarding the usage of the Energy
Management Handbook held this time, three companies and organizations were selected as thecompanies wishing to utilize the tools including the Energy Management Handbook in their factoryand building energy management activities and energy conservation promotion. However, in the end
the supporting person in MOF described as (3) below suddenly became unavailable on the day inquestion, so that the two companies (1) and (2) were visited and interchanges were carried out on
November 2. For details, refer to the Attached Materials- III-2-2-3.
(1) Green Tech Malaysia/Green Energy Office Building (Former PTM Company)(2) Diamond Building(3) Ministry of FinanceIII-25

Attached Materials III-2-2-1: Agenda of Malaysia Intensive Seminar-Workshop

AGENDA: Intensive Seminar-Workshop
Promotion Of Energy Efficiency And Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2011-2012
Corus Hotel,
08:30 – 09:00
09:00 – 09:10

09:10 – 09:20
09:20 – 09:30
09.30 – 09:45
09:45 – 11:15
09:45 – 10:45

10:45 – 11:15
11:15 – 15:30
11:15 – 11:45
11:45 – 12:30

12:30 – 13:30
13:30 – 15:30

15:30 – 15:45
15:45 – 16:00
16:00 – 17:45
16:00 – 16:15
16:15 – 16:45
16:45 – 17:00
17:00 – 17:30

31 October 2011

Registration
Welcome Remarks by Host country
Mr. Badaruddin Mahyudin, Deputy Secretary General (Energy)
Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water
Opening Statement by The Energy Conservation Center, Japan (Mr. Y. OGURA, ECCJ)
Mr. Yutaka Ogura, General Manager, Energy Conservation Center, Japan
Opening Statement by Ms. Maureen Balamiento, Representative, ASEAN Centre for Energy
COFFEE BREAK & GROUP PHOTO SESSION
Session 1: PROMEEC Projects / PROMEEC EM Project: Outline & Achievements
Presentation by ACE & ECCJ
1) Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (ACE )2) Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (ECCJ)
Presentation by Host country (Mr. Zaini Abdul Wahab)
Realized Activities / Outstanding Improvement through PROMEEC Projects
Session 2: “ASEAN Energy Management System”: Functions & Program
Presentation by ECCJ; Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System” (ECCJ)
Presentation by ECCJ and ACE
Specific Functions and Program
1) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of 5th ASEAN Awards for 2010-2011 and Plan for 2011-2012 (ACE)2) Information System- Information System to Disseminate Awarded Cases (ECCJ)LUNCH
2) Information System (Continued)- Introduction of JASE-World (ECCJ)
3) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook and other tools (ECCJ)- In-house Database for Industries and Buildings (ACE)- Technical Directory for Industries and Buildings (ACE)- ASEAN Energy Management Service to Utilize The Existing Implementing Organizations(ACE)- Harmonization of ISO 50001 and EMHB (ECCJ)
Q&A
COFFEE BREAK
Session 3 : Awareness
1) Financial Support System in ASEAN (ACE )2) Situation of Awareness Raising and Financial Support System in Japan (ECCJ)
3) Japanese Experience of Energy Saving after huge Disaster (ECCJ)
Q&A
End of Intensive Seminar-Workshop

III-26

Attached Materials III-2-2-2: Agenda of Malaysia Training in EMHBAGENDA
Training: Utilization of “Energy Management Handbook and Tools for ASEAN”
Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2011-2012
Corus Hotel,
09:00 – 12:30
09:00 – 10:30
10.30 - 10:45
10:45 – 12:15
12:15 – 12:30
12:30 – 13:30
13:30 – 17:10
13:30 – 13:45
13:45 – 14:00

14:00 – 14:15
14:15 – 15:45

15.45 - 16:00
16:00 – 16:30
16:30 – 16:45
16:45 – 17:00
17:00 – 17:10

01 November 2011
Session 1: Seminar by ECCJ
Explanation by ECCJ:
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (part 1) (ECCJ)
COFFEE BREAK
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (part 2) (ECCJ)
Q&A
LUNCH
Session 2: Workshop (Training for Small Group Activities) by KeTTHA/ECCJ
Guidance for Group Work by( ECCJ)(Experience of Dissemination of ASEAN Award Best Practices of EM)
Brief Introduction of Best Practices/EM in Building by KeTTHA (Case 1)
GREEN ENERGY OFFICE (GEO), GREENTECH MALAYSIA, MALAYSIA
Brief Introduction of Best Practices/EM in Industry by KeTTHA (Case 2)
GLAXO WELLCOME MANUFACTURING PTE LTD, SINGAPORE>
Group Work Based on Cases Studies 1 & 2 by ECCJ
- Preparation for Group Work- Discussion by Groups:
Guideline and Basic Plan to Improve Using “Energy Management Handbook”
COFFEE BREAK
Presentation by Participants:
Results of Group Work for Cases Studies 1 & 2 (Participants)
Comments by ECCJ Experts and KeTTHA
Discussion on Plan of EM Training in Host Country moderated by FP
Closing Remarks by KeTTHACOMPLETION OF TRAINING

III-27

Attached Materials III-2-2-3:

Advisory Visit

PROMEEC (Energy Management) Related Organization Visit: Malaysia (No.1)
Visit to GreenTech Malaysia/Green Energy Office
No. Item
Details
1
Date and Time November 2 (Wednesday) 10:00-12:45
2
3

Company
visited
Persons met

4

Accompanied
Persons(MEGTW)

5

Visitors(ACE, ECCJ)GEO (Green Energy Office), GreenTech Malaysia
Mr. Muhammad Fendi Mustafa: Research Officer, Energy, Manufacturing,
Building & ICT- Mr. Mohd Quyyum Bin Ab Rahman: Assistant Secretary, Sustainable
Energy Division, Energy Sector- Mr. Faiz Bin Fadzil: Principal Assistant Secretary, Sustainable Energy
Division, Energy Sector- Ms. Maureen Balamiento (ACE, IT Expert)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (ECCJ, Technical Cooperation Department, General
Manager)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (ECCJ, Technical Cooperation Department, TechnicalExpert)

6. Overview of Visited Company(1) Although GEO was awarded 2nd Runner-up in the Small & Medium Building category at the 5th
ASEAN Award of Best Practice in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings in the
2010-2011, it had once again requested this Advisory Visit, so the company was visited.
(2) GEO uses the building that was formerly the PTM (Malaysian Energy Center), which waspreviously known as the ZEO (Zero Energy Office) building. Although the intention was thatpower generation using PV (Photo Voltaic) would offset the energy consumption amount andmake it zero, the initially anticipated energy consumption amount of 35kWh/m2/year was not
obtained. This was revised to 65kWh/m2/year, after V power generation is subtracted, whichmeans the energy consumption is changed to 30-35kWh/m2/year. In July 2009, it became
Malaysia’s first Green Building.
(3) This former PTM building was also used as the venue for the PROMEEC EM Project Intensive
Seminar-Workshop and Training Course held two years ago, so ECCJ was visiting for the firsttime for two years. During the visit, AEMAS training was being held, and the lecturer was Dr.
Zainuddin Manan (UTM: Malaysia Technical University), the Malaysian representative memberof the BOJ for the ASEAN Awards EM, who has frequently visited Japan for the Research Forum.
We were also informed that the Smart Community Forum, jointly held by Malaysia and NEDO
and the Smart Community Association of Japan, is carried out in this building.
7. Hearing and Discussion Details(1) Hearing Details<1> A detailed explanation was given of the energy conservation technologies, facilities, andstructure as a zero energy building model.
<2> During daytime, natural lighting is used as far as possible by utilizing reflective panels andwhite walls so that artificial lighting is hardly used. In addition, T5 is used for the fluorescentlighting, and many LED task lights (exclusive desktop lamps) are incorporated.
<3> Cooling by floor slab cooling and chilled water thermal energy storage is implemented, andpresent sensors are installed. Four types of solar panels are installed on the roof. Three of thesolar panel types are made by Japanese companies (Mitsubishi Electric, Sharp, and Kaneka). In

III-28

addition, BEMS had also been introduced, but it was a Scandinavian-made system called TAC.
<4> In the future they intend to install fuel cells in the Control Room and an electric automobile
battery charger in the parking lot.
(2) Explanations, Opinions, and Proposals made by ECCJ, including the On-site Inspections<1> As this is a model building, many types of enterprising technologies and equipment have been
introduced and are proving effective. However, it was felt that there may still be room for
improvement in the activities and results from an energy management point of view.
Apparently there were 60 people working in this office, but rather than conducting activities
only for researchers, we felt there was a need to implement energy conservation activities thatinvolve all the employees.
<2> Particularly since the building is specifically claiming to be a Green Energy Office, wesuggested that PR should be carried out such as by showing the electric power consumption
and power generation amount current values and recent data on a monitor screen in a location
just inside the entrance.
(3) Response of Visited Company<1> Apart from greetings from two old acquaintances, support was provided only by Mr.
Muhammad Fendi Mustafa, but apparently the company was also carrying out training
activities at the same time.
8. Overview of On-site Inspection<1> In the working zones inside the building, there was no problem with the illumination provided
by the natural light, even using little artificial lighting. We could exchange greetings at theoffice with Mr. Zairin and Mr. Hishamudin our acquaintances who are from the time when thecompany was known as PTM. We could also confirm the present sensors on the stairs and in
the toilets, and the PV solar panels on the roof.

III-29

PROMEEC (Energy Management) Related Organization Visit: Malaysia (No.2)
Visit to Energy Commission / Diamond Building
No. Item
Details
1
Date and Time November 2 (Wednesday) 14:00-16:00
2

Company
visited3

Persons met

4

Accompanying
Persons(MEGTW)

5

Visitors(ACE, ECCJ)

Suruhanjaya Tenaga (Energy Commission)/Diamond Building(Type of government institution established for the purpose of energy
conservation promotion)- Ms. Hamidah binti Abdul Rashid (Head Administration & Facilities
Management, Energy Commission)- Mr. Zulkhibri, (Staff, Administration & Facilities Management, EC)- Mr. Johari Jenon (Building Management Manager, Putra Perdana
Development Sdn Bhd)
- Mr. Faiz Bin Fadzil (Principal Assistant Secretary, Sustainable Energy
Division, Energy Sector)- Mr. Mohd Quyyum B. Ab Rahman (Assistant Secretary, Sustainable
Energy Division, Energy Sector)- Ms. Maureen Balamiento (ACE, IT Specialist)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (ECCJ, Technical Cooperation Department, General
Manager)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (ECCJ, Technical Cooperation Department, TechnicalExpert)

6. Overview of Visited Company
The visited company was the diamond-shaped building known as the Diamond Building which is
being used exclusively by the Suruhanjaya Tenaga (Energy Commission).
First we watched a corporate video in the small theater-type lecture hall called the Theatrette.
According to this video, the overview of the Energy Commission and the building were as follows.
(1) Energy Commission
In 2001, the Energy Commission Act was established and the Energy Commission was created as
the government institution undertaking the role of energy conservation promotion. Actual activities
started from January 2002. The Commission promotes awareness of EE&C among energy
consuming companies. In addition to energy, the Commission is also in charge of water
conservation and environmental considerations.
(2) Diamond BuildingThis building also undertakes the role of a showcase. As for BEI (Building Energy Index),buildings in Malaysia commonly have values around 210 kWh/m2/yr, but this building was plannedwith a target of 85 kWh/m2/yr. The actual result including the photovoltaic power generation
realizes 65 kWh/m2/yr. (The value excluding photovoltaic power generation is around 75
kWh/m2/yr, which is still lower than the target.) The main data is as follows.
- Construction Start
September 2007
- Completion
July 2010- Gross Floor Area
14,230 m2- Net Floor Area
11,473 m2 (Floor Occupancy 75%)
- Air Conditioned Area
3,600 m2
- No. of People Working 151 (Capacity 250)
- No. of Stories
1.5 + 8- Windows
Single glazing

III-30- PV Power Generation- Construction Cost

10,000 kWh
RM 64.6 million (USD 20.56 million)

7. Hearing and Discussion Details(1) Hearing Details
This building is also one of the demonstration projects of the Malaysian EE&C activities. The
planning and construction took place after the LEO (Low Energy Office、BEI Target 100) andGEO (Green Energy Office, Target BEI 65), and different from the preceding two buildings,
various factors were determined with consideration to cost performance as an actual officebuilding model. It has a meaning of a showcase of low-carbon building. (However, numerical
CO2 reduction was achieved through energy conservation and was not the initial concern.)
Because the building was completed using greenification concepts, it is sometimes praised as “A
Gem in Putrajaya”.
Energy consumption in the building is managed by the BAS (Building Automation System). (Forexample, the air conditioner setting temperature is 24°C, but temperature distribution is being
generated inside the building.) In addition, although various devices are applied, the following
Seven Green Key Factors are named as the seven items making up the characteristics of thisbuilding.
- Photovoltaic Electricity Generation
The capacity is 71.4 kW. The solar panels are made by Solar Phoenix of the US using cadmium
telluride as the material. (These are different from the products made by Japanese companies
which use silicon.)(In a difference from the case of the GEO building, there is no need to carry out regular cleaning,
due to the self-cleaning function.)- Rooftop TroughRainwater falling on the roof is collected using the gutters.
- Insulated Concrete Floor
There is a 100 mm thick insulation layer below the roof concrete and in the ceilings.
- Floor Slab Cooling
Chilled water is passed through piping in the concrete parts of each floor to carry out cooling.
This chilled water is supplied commonly to this district only during daytime (10:00-18:00) fromthe Putrajaya Service Center, Gas District Company (GDC)- Rainwater Harvesting
The rainwater collected by the gutters as described above is stored in four tanks (Total capacity
10,000 L) and effectively utilized.
- Greenery on the Roof
Short grass is being grown on the roof, and the people in charge inspect and maintain it whennecessary.
- Dome for Daylight
The core of the building has an atrium-like construction that allows the natural light enteringfrom above to pass through the central part and be utilized for lighting each floor.
While around 80% of the building’s heat is accumulated in the floor concrete on each storey due
to the utilization of the floor slab cooling method described above, the air conditioning in eachroom is carried out using Air Handling Units (AHU) which utilize pre-cooled air at
approximately 20°C that is taken in from the roof.

III-31

In addition, education is also being carried out to enhance the awareness of employees.
Because defectswere found after the start of use, efforts were initially made to enable these
problem places to be normally used. For example, although light sensors were arranged in order
to automatically switch on lighting when the illumination by natural light was insufficient, they
did not work as intended. It is planned to reconsider the sensor installation locations. (Motion
sensors for detecting the movement of people have not yet been installed.)(2) Explanations, Opinions, and Proposals made by ECCJ, including the On-site Inspections
ECCJ recommended the company to make a submission to the ASEAN Energy Awards. The
current situation is depending on new and highly effective facilities to achieve energy
conservation actual results. However, in order to receive an ASEAN Energy Award it will benecessary also to implement various activities from the viewpoint of energy management, and weadvised the company that it would be better to make the submission after accumulating resultsfrom this point of view.
(3) Response of Visited Company
Based on the discussions this time, the company is also considering applying for the ASEAN
Energy Awards.
8. Overview of the On-site Inspections
We toured the site. Only two of the four elevators were working. The ceilings are quite low. The
room temperatures and energy usage amounts measured using the BAS were displayed on panelson the walls on the corridor on each floor. (This is very good from the point of view of sharing
information and raising awareness.)
The exterior walls of the building are overhanging rather than being vertical, in a structure thatallows the sunlight entering from the windows to contribute to the lighting while enabling the heatto escape to the upper part of the room. On the other hand, regarding the lighting from the central
dome area, a blind (shade) is provided in the upper part for use when the weather is sunny. (When
we visited it was rainy, so the blind was fully open.)
Additionally, between last year and this year the building received awards from many organizations,
including the Green Building Index, BCA Awards, and Green Mark Singapore, which are displayedon the first floor.

III-32

III-2-3. Lao PDRThis time, following a proposal by Lao PDR at the Inception Workshop, The Seminar-Workshop andTraining were held in Savannakhet City, which lies on the Mekong River sandwiched between
Thailand and Vietnam in the central part of Lao PDR. The Phonepaseud Hotel in Savannakhet was thevenue, while the Lam Plastic Manufacturing Company in this citywas visited for the Advisory Visit.
The Focal Point, Mr. Bouathep Malaykham (Director of Electric Power Management Division,
Department of Electricity, Ministry of Energy and Mines) and his subordinates, Mr. Viengsay Chantha
and Mr. Thammanoune Nakhavith, drove for six hours by car from the capital, Vientiane, to join us at
the location. Note that Savannakhet is reached by propeller plane from Bangkok, Thailand, in one andhalf hours. (The flight complement is 60 persons, but on both the back and forth journeys there were
15-20 passengers.) Although Savannakhet is ostensibly an international airport, it was an unusually
local type of international airport. This area forms the pivot of the east-west economic corridor linking
Vietnam, Lao PDR, Thailand and Myanmar, so it is expected to realize large economic growth in the
future.
2. Intensive Seminar-Workshop
The program of the Intensive Seminar-Workshop on the first day is shown in Attached Materials
III-2-3-1.
(1) Welcoming remarks: Welcoming addresses were made to the cooperating organizations by Mr.
Poukhong Nammachack, Director of Energy and Mines Department in Savannakhet Province,
Mr. Christpher Zamora of ACE, and Mr. Yutaka Ogura of ECCJ, and the significance of energy
conservation promotion and the PROMEEC/EM projects and their activities and developmentsin the future were introduced. An overview of each greeting is shown below.
<1> Mr. Poukhong Nammachack: Although the greeting was given in Laotian without
interpretation so that the detailed content is not known, we understand that he expressedthanks for the financial and technical support from Japan, as well as speaking on theimportance of tackling energy conservation due to the expected higher level of growth in
the future in Savannakhet Province, which has the largest area in Lao PDR and the largest
population, and also includes many industries and factories.
<2> In the ECCJ greeting, thanks were given particularly for the aid given by each country for
the Great East Japan Earthquake and tidal wave which had occurred earlier in the year.
Mention was made that introductions would be made later to points learned from theresponse to the electricity shortage caused by the nuclear power station accident this time.
In addition, in this eighth year of the PROMEEC EM, although Lao PDR was continuing
activities after a two-year break, a request was made for them to implement the Phase-3
activities using a more independent framework.
<3> ACE expressed thanks for the support from METI and the cooperation of ECCJ, together
with the cooperation of the FP in Lao PDR and related persons in Savannakhet. The
speaker emphasized the importance of determining targets, promoting energy efficiency,
and developing energy management tools in order to make energy security sustainable, andmentioned that the current year’s EM project had already been implemented in Myanmar
and Malaysia, and would be carried out in Lao PDR this time and in Thailand the following
week.
(2) Session 1: PROMEEC Projects/PROMEEC EM Project: Outline & Achievements;
Introduction to the overall PROMEEC Project and the EM (Energy Management System

III-33

Improvement) Project<1> Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (Mr. Zamora, ACE): Introduction to the
EE&C activities in the APAEC 2010-2015 Program, to the activity situation and number ofparticipants until now in the three PROMEEC Projects, and to the activities in the current
year.
<2> Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ):
Introduction to the EM Project in current year project plan
<3> Realized Activities/Outstanding Improvement through PROMEEC Projects in Lao PDR(Mr. Bouathep, MEM): Explanation of the actual results of implementing the three
PROMEEC projects and the situation of energy conservation promotion.
(3) Session 2: Introductions to the Functions and Programs of the ASEAN Energy Management
System<1> Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System” (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ):
Introduction to the issues and items to be implemented in the system in the current fiscal
year, together with requests for the application and provision of information data.
<2> Specific Functions and ProgramA) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in EM for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2010-2011 and Plan for 2011-2012 (Mr.
Zamora, ACE): Introduction to the details and judging results by the BOJ of the 24
applications submitted in the EM sector this year, together with details of future issues
in the Buildings sector.
B) Information System- Information Analyses to Ease Dissemination of Awarded Cases (Mr. Takashi Sato,
ECCJ): Explanation of plan to extract and share characteristics that can be read from thecurrent year’s application contents, and introduction to characteristics of Best Practicecases in the three sectors.
- Introduction of JASE-World (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ): In relation to the e-Directoryfor Technologies & Equipment, introduction to JASE-World and to the methods ofutilizing the technical directory.
C) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook (EMHB) and Other Tools (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ):
Introduction to the EMHB and the related thermal and electrical technical handbooks,
together with the versions in each country, and the EE&C Manuals that are being
prepared in each ASEAN country.
- Updates on the Development of PROMEEC EM Tools:
A. Technical Directory (TD) for Industries and Buildings
B. In-house Database (IHDB) for Industries and Buildings
C. ASEAN Energy Management Service to Utilize The Existing Implementing Organizations(Mr. Zamora, ACE): Introduction to the TD types and examples, access methods, IHDB
by industry and building types and activity situation, revised and corrected case studies,
introduction to the ASEAN Energy Management Service and request for participation
and usage, and introduction to registrations which currently comprise 17 institutions
registered as implementing organizations.

III-34

(4) Session 3: Awareness and Financing<1> Financial Support System in ASEAN (Mr. Zamora, ACE): Introduction using tables of thepotential funding sources in the main ASEAN countries.
Note that regarding the following contents planned for the first day, but Laotian interpretingfrom the English language materials took twice time as much as usual explanation. In addition,
due to the circumstances in Lao PDR the activities had to be completed by 4 pm. Even making
efforts to give explanations in the most effective ways, it was not possible to finish by 4 pm, andfor the following activities we requested the participants to refer to the distributed materials.
Session 2: Introductions to the Functions and Programs of the ASEAN Energy Management
System<1> Harmonization of ISO 50001 and EMHB (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ)
Session 3: Awareness and Financing；<1> Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System in Japan (Mr.
Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ)<2> Japanese Experience of Energy Saving after Huge Disaster (Mr. Yutaka Ogura, ECCJ)(11) Breakdown of Participants<1> Ministry of Energy and Mines: 3 persons<2> Department of Energy and Mines in Savannakhet Province: 5 persons<3> Department of Agriculture and Forest in Savannakhet Province: 1 person<4> Department of Transportation in Savannakhet Province: 1 person<5> Department of Post in Savannakhet Province: 1 person<6> Department of Planning and Investment in Savannakhet Province: 1 person<7> Department of Finance in Savannakhet Province: 1 person<8> Justice in Savannakhet Province: 1 person<9> EDL (Electricite Du Laos), Head Office in Vientiane: 3 persons<10> EDL (Electricite Du Laos) in Savannakhet Province: 1 person<11> Electrical Construction and Installation (ECI, State Company): 1 person<12> Electricity Defence in Savannakhet: 1 person<13> Savanhkham Electrical Company: 1 person<14> Doung Deaune Electrical Installation Company: 1 person<15> KPS Electrical Installation Company., Ltd.: 1 person<16> Savannakhet University: 1 person<17> Teacher University in Savannakhet Province: 1 person<18> Vocational School in Savannakhet Province: 1 person<19> Savannakhet Hospital: 2 persons<20> Daosavanh Hotel: 1 person<21> Roungthip Hotel: 1 person<22> Lao Steel: 1 person<23> Biomass Factory: 1 person<24> Ice and Drinking Water Factory: 1 person<25> Nail Factory: 1 person<26> Salt Produce Factory: 1 person<27> Sugar Factory: 2 persons

III-35

<28> Plastic Bag Company: 1 persons<29> Craft Industry Co. Ltd: 1 person<30> SNP Factory: 1 person<31> Kolao Company: 1 person<32> ACE: 1 person<33> ECCJ: 3 persons(12) Responses and Issues at the ISW, etc.
<1> Although initially the FP said that 50 people would gather for the ISW, when we arrived
at Savannakhet the way from the airport to the hotel and hotel area was quite rural, andwe could not see any factories or industry in the vicinity. We were therefore concerned
whether so many people would attend, but in fact 45 persons including the organizing
party gathered for the ISW. When ECCJ confirmed the breakdown of the participants
before giving our initial explanation, we found there were 11 people related to industry
and factories, 12 people from buildings, hotels and commercial facilities, no persons
related to engineering, consultant or ESCO companies, 12 persons from government,
local and public institutions, and other persons related to electric power. As can be seenfrom the details above, an extremely wide range of people had gathered. When we asked
why, we found that Savannakhet has an important place in the east-west economic
corridor linking Vietnam, Lao PDR, Thailand, and Myanmar, and is an important citythat is expected to develop in the future.
<2> This was the first time to hold the PROMEEC/EM in Savannakhet, and when we
confirmed with the participants, we found that no-one knew anything about the
PROMEEC Projects, ACE, the ASEAN Awards, or SGA. Although one person indicatedthat they knew something of energy audits and one knew about energy management, it
appeared that there were people who would not raise their hands even if they did know.
PDCA also initially said that none of the participants knew about the subjects, but
afterwards they found that when speaking in Laotian quite a few of the participants had
some knowledge. Although all the participants kindly listened with great enthusiasm,
unfortunately there was insufficient time to hold Q&As. Even though the participants
may not have adequate experience or knowledge of energy conservation, it is thoughtthat the holding of this type of seminar in major regional cities together with the FP will
have great significance for the dissemination of the activities.
<3> However, few participants could understand English. Although the explanations by ECCJ
and ACE were alternately interpreted by Mr. Bouathep and Mr. Viengsay, it is believedthat if possible the English materials should be translated to Laotian beforehand anddistributed to the participants to make the ISW more effective. Note that the Laotianversion of the Energy Management Handbook has already been completed, and support
was provided to allow its distribution to each participant this time.

III-36

2. Training of Utilizing the Energy Management Handbook
The number of participants on the first day was 45 persons including the people from the hostorganization, and the participants on the second day were also basically the same persons as on thefirst day. All the participants enthusiastically and earnestly listened to the lecture. The number ofparticipants (excluding the persons from ECCJ, ACE, and the three persons from the host organization
Department of Energy and Mines) was 33 persons. By grouping the participants, three groups wereformed for the Group Work activities on this day.
As with the previously described Myanmar and Malaysia activity details, the contents of the second
day were as follows.
<1> In the morning, the explanation of the In-house Database and Technical Directory thatwas formerly carried out was omitted (since a summary explanation was given during
the seminar on the first day), and an explanation of the Energy Management Handbook
was given.
<2> Formerly, the Energy Management Handbook was explained almost page-by-page, but
the Laotian version of this book was distributed to the participants for use as materials.
Further, because the book can be downloaded from the ACE and ECCJ websites, theexplanation was given by PowerPoint slides showing the key points.
<3> The afternoon was mainly spent for Group Work, and the Group Work that was formerly
carried out on the first day was discontinued and unified to the Group Work on thesecond day.
In the Lao PDR, this was the first time for a PROMEEC Seminar to be held in a region administeredby the local office of the Department of Energy and Mines, and for most of the participants this wastheir first time to participate in the Training. Accordingly, the Energy Management Handbook was
explained and Group Work was implemented while giving consideration to the following points.
<1> Recognizing that there were people hearing the Energy Handbook explanation for the first time,
we restricted ourselves to carefully explain the basic items (including past developments).
<2> Among the items, we explained in detail about the core Key Step Approach methodology.
Further, in consideration of the timing, it was necessary to allocate enough time for giving acomparison with ISO 50001.
<3> The two cases for the Group Work were quickly decided and copies were prepared, andadditionally a summary explanation of the contents was given to the participants just before.
<4> A considerable number of participants took part in the Group Work, and sufficiently active
training in discussions and the summary was realized.
Although the characteristics of the current fiscal year are as described above, the details (Program) of
the Training that was actually implemented is shown in Attached Materials III-2-3-2.
The following describes the results of each item on the day.
(1) Lecture: A lecture was given relating to the overview and characteristics of the Energy Management
Handbook and its detailed contents and key guidelines. (Mr. Fumio Ogawa ECCJ) All participants
enthusiastically listened to the explanation. In particular, regarding the Key Step Approach, adetailed description was given referring to a figure from the Laotian version of the Handbook
which had been distributed.
(2) Workshop (Group Activities): Explanation of methods of conducting Group Activities (Mr.
Takashi Sato, ECCJ)<1> Introduction of the energy conservation activities in the case studies of following two

III-37

companies.
A) MMLDC Foundation (Small-scale building Best Practice case study of a training company
from the Philippines)B) Toshiba Information Equipment (TIP) (Factory Best Practice case study from the Philippines)
Regarding both these cases, Mr. Christopher Zamora of ACE kindly gave summary explanations.
<2> Group WorkAt the start of the Group Work, an explanation was given by ECCJ of the basic facts. The analysis
and assessment of cases were to use the Energy Management Handbook for the standards as far
as possible, and discussions were held regarding whether the necessary items had been
implemented without omissions.
Discussions were summarized and the following items were finally presented (as in the past).
A) Good points of the energy conservation activities based on the contents introduced above, and
B) Advice for improvement plans that could be implemented in the future.
The participants were divided into three groups. The number of persons in each group and theselected cases were as follows.
The division into groups was carried out by Mr. Bouathep following the method of mixing people
with different backgrounds.
Group No.
No. of Persons
Selected CaseGroup Name1
11 persons
MMLDC
Arian
2
10 persons
TIP
Green
3
10 persons
TIP
Energy Efficiency
Although the time for discussions was only one and half hours, each group discussed the main
points well, and prepared the summary and presentation. Further, the host organization had
several persons who had experience of previously participating in Training courses such as
MTPEC, and these persons gave advice to each Group discussion in Laotian. The explanation
was given while referring to the Key Step Approach pages in the Laotian version of the Energy
Management Handbook. Each of the groups well summarized the key points on a large sheet ofwhite paper for giving their presentations.
The presentations were given in Laotian, and the key points were explained in English by Mr.
Bouathep. Each group faithfully followed the Key Step Approach of the Energy Management
Handbook to arrange the contents of each case study. However, there were differences by groupin comments to the points for improvement.
<3> Comments from ECCJ Experts
A summary of the comments from ECCJ is as follows.
- Although the Group (Small Group) Activities were carried out mostly by participants with noprevious experience, the discussions, summarizing, and presentations were carried out
appropriately as though it was not their first time.
- We were highly encouraged to confirm the fact that the EM Handbook methodology,
particularly of the Key Step Approach which was explained in the morning on the day, had been
well assimilated and was in a condition where it could be utilized.
- We believe that the participants on the day could experience the Group Activities and could
appreciate for themselves the effectiveness of the activities. After all the participants return totheir workplaces, we hope they will incorporate SGA activities into their workplaces. Further,

III-38

we hope they will hold research forums in their workplaces and act as lecturers to teach others.
(3) Comments from ACE
Comments were given including thanks by Mr. Zamora.
(4) Comments from Host Country
Similarly, comments were given including thanks by Mr. Bouathep.
(5) Breakdown of participants
The breakdown of the 33 participants was as described below, and included various persons
related to ministries and agencies, factories, buildings, and universities. Further, none of the three
persons from the host organization participated in the Group Work, but instead they provided
advice and instruction.
<1> Department of Energy and Mines/Savannakhet
5 persons<2> Other Related Departments in Savannakhet
6 persons<3> EDL (Lao PDR Electric Power Public Corporation, HQ and Branches)
4 persons<4> Electric Power Company-related
4 persons<5> University and School-related
3 persons<6> Hotel and Hospital-related
3 persons<7> Industry
8 persons
5. Company Visit
Based on the Intensive Seminar-Workshop and the Training regarding the usage of the Energy
Management Handbook held this time, the Lam Plastic Manufacturing Company was selected as acompany wishing to utilize the tools including the Energy Management Handbook in its factory andbuilding energy management activities and energy conservation promotion, and this company was
visited and interchanges were carried out on January 13. For details, refer to Attached Materials
III-2-3-3.

III-39

Attached Materials III-2-3-1: Agenda of Lao PDR Intensive Seminar-Workshop

AGENDA
Intensive Seminar-Workshop
Promotion Of Energy Efficiency And Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2011-2012
Savannakhet, Lao PDR,
January 11, 201208:30 – 08:50
08:50 – 09:00
09:00 – 09:10
09:10 – 09:20
09.20 – 09:58
09:58 – 11:24
09:58 – 11:08

11:08 – 11:24
11:24 – 15:50
11:24 – 11:50
12:00 – 13:00
13:05 – 14:55

14:55 – 15:15
15:15 – 15:50

15:50 – 15:57
15:50 – 15:57
16:00

Registration
Welcome Remarks by Mr. Poukhong Nammachack, Director, Savannakhet Province
Opening Statement by Mr. Ogura, The Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ)
Opening Statement by Mr. Zamora, ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE)
COFFEE BREAK & GROUP PHOTO SESSION
Session 1:
PROMEEC Projects / PROMEEC EM Project : Outline & Achievements
Presentation by ACE & ECCJ
1) Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (ACE )2) Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (ECCJ)
Presentation by Host country
Realized Activities / Outstanding Improvement through PROMEEC Projects
Session 2:“ASEAN Energy Management System”: Functions & Program
Presentation by ECCJ
Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System” (ECCJ)
LUNCHPresentation by ECCJ and ACE
Specific Functions and Program
1) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of 5th ASEAN Awards for 2010-2011 and Plan for 2011-2012 (ACE)2) Information System- Information System to Disseminate Awarded Cases (ECCJ)- Introduction of JASE-World (ECCJ)
COFFEE BREAK
Presentation by ECCJ, and ACE
3) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook and other tools (ECCJ)- In-house Database for Industries and Buildings (ACE)- Technical Directory for Industries and Buildings (ACE)- ASEAN Energy Management Service to Utilize The Existing Implementing Organizations(ACE)
Session 3: Awareness & Finance1) Financial Support System in ASEAN (ACE )End of Intensive Seminar-Workshop- Harmonization of ISO 50001 and EMHB (ECCJ)
2) Situation of Awareness Raising and Financial Support System in Japan (ECCJ)
3) Japanese Experience of Energy Saving after huge Disaster (ECCJ)

III-40Attached materials III-2-3-2: Agenda of Lao PDR Training in EMHBAGENDA
Training : Utilization of “Energy Management Handbook and Tools for ASEAN”
Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2011-2012
Savannakhet, Lao PDR,
January 12, 2012
08:40 – 12:00

Session 1: Seminar by ECCJ

08:40 – 10:00
10.00 - 10:25

Explanation by ECCJ:
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (part 1) (ECCJ)
COFFEE BREAK

10:25 – 11:40

Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (part 2) (ECCJ)

11:40 – 12:00

Guidance for Group Work by( ECCJ)

12:00 – 13:00

LUNCH

13:00 – 16:00

Session 2: Workshop (Training for Small Group Activities) by Host Country/ECCJ

13:00 – 13:20(Experience of Dissemination of ASEAN Award Best Practices of EM)
Brief Introduction of Best Practices /EM in Building by Host Country (Case 1)<2010-11 Best Practices/EM in Industry, XXX> (ACE)
Brief Introduction of Best Practices /EM in Industry by Host Country (Case 2)<2010-11Best Practices/EM in Building, XXX > (ACE)Group Work Based on Cases Studies 1 & 2 by Host Country/ECCJ- Preparation for Group Work- Discussion by Groups:
Guideline and Basic Plan to Improve Using “Energy Management Handbook”
COFFEE BREAK

13:20 – 13:40
13:40 – 15:10

15.10 - 15:24
15:24 – 16:00
16:00 – 16:05

Presentation by Participants:
Results of Group Work for Cases Studies 1 & 2 (Participants)
Comments by ECCJ Experts and Host Country

16:05 – 16:10

Closing Remarks by Host Country
COMPLETION OF TRAINING

III-41

Attached Materials III-2-3-3:

Advisory Visit

PROMEEC (Energy Management) Related Organization Visit: Lao PDR
Visit to Lam Plastic Manufacturing Company
No. Item
Details
1
Date and Time January 13 (Friday) 08:45-11:00
2
3

VisitedCompany
Persons met

4

Accompanied
Persons(MEM)

5Visitors(ACE, ECCJ)

Lam Plastic Manufacturing Company- Mr. Khan Soundara (Marketing Manager)- Mr. Phavong Louonghraltha- Mr. Bouathep Malaykham (Director of Division, Electric PowerManagement Division, Department of Electricity, MEM)
- Mr. Viengsay Chanta (Electrical Engineer, EPM Division, Dept ofElectricity, MEM)
- Mr. Thammanoune Nakhavith (EPM Division, Dept of Electricity,
MEM)- Mr. Bounta Chimmala (Department of Energy and Mines, Savannakhet
Province)- Mr. Christopher Zamora (ACE, Manager)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (ECCJ, Technical Cooperation Department, General
Manager)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (ECCJ, Technical Cooperation Department, TechnicalExpert)- Mr. Takashi Sato (ECCJ, Technical Cooperation Department, TechnicalExpert)

6. Overview of Visited Company
The Lam Plastic Manufacturing Company carries out a wide range of businesses including plastic bags,
drinking water, ice, straws, plastic cord, and plastic reuse, and according to Marketing Manager Mr.
Khan their business condition is apparently favorable. The company was established 17 years ago.
Although their ice-making machines and tap water purification filters are new, their plastic bag
manufacturing line has old machines and a large number of young women in a labor-intensive work
place. Almost all of the 180 employees work on the plastic bag production line. In addition, a different
office is also producing salt. The factory is operating 7 days a week, and the employees are working
from 07:30 to 17:00. During normal periods, 20 tons of ice is manufactured each day, but in times ofhigh demand more is produced. The PET bottle for water is divided into 350 ml (1 dozen bottles
12,000 Kip), 500 ml (1 dozen bottles 4,000 Kip), 2000 ml (1 dozen bottles 3,000 Kip), and 20 liters (1bottle 1,500 Kip). For ice, 1 kg costs 500 Kip. The filling of bottles with water and adding ice to bags
is carried out by people who are not wearing masks and have sandals on their feet, so the concept ofhygiene is somewhat lacking. The structure is such that rats and insects such as cockroaches will beable to freely enter the premises at nighttime. The water used as the raw material is tap water which
undergoes filtering two times, and Public Health conducts checks once every two months. Although
the factory electricity cost is 60-70 million Kip per month, Mr. Bouathep expressed doubt that thismay only be the electricity cost of the ice or water.
7. Hearing and Discussion Details
First Mr. Yutaka Ogura, General Manager of ECCJ, expressed thanks to Mr. Khan for attending thetwo-day Seminar and Workshop, and for accepting the Advisory Visit.
(1) Energy Conservation Activity Details
The factory was not collecting data that would allow summarization of the Energy Index. Energy

III-42conservation had been implemented six or seven years ago, and at that time the energy use wasslightly reduced by tuning the machines. In particular, the top management is satisfied with thecurrent situation and there are no actions being implemented to improve the factory. Only the top
management is aware of how much energy is being used and where it is being used. The technicalstaff (two persons who did not attend the meeting) should take more actions to collect and analyze
the data on a daily basis. We also advised that the EMHB and the materials used in the Seminarshould be shown to the top management to deepen understanding of energy conservation.
(2) Explanations, Opinions, and Proposals made by ECCJ, including the On-site Inspections
There was a location around the freezers where part was not being cooled. The area surrounding thefactory is being used as a garbage dump. The inside of the factory is not being kept neat and orderly.
We proposed that SGA should be introduced to the factory to improve the working environment andenable the holding of discussions on energy conservation to raise the levels. In addition, from a safety
point of view, since most of the rotating parts did not have covers, we advised that they should becovered to avoid the risk of becoming caught in the machines.
(3) Response of Visited Company
Although Mr. Khan is a Sales Manager and not a technical staff member, he thoroughly showed us
round the factory. Regarding the factory, it will be necessary to first make approaches to the top
management to promote energy conservation, and we felt that it would be necessary to form a unified
and cooperative relationship between the top management and the technical staff.

III-43

III-2-4. Thailand
Recently in Thailand, the PROMEEC EM Project is being implemented every two years. Each time,
activities are being carried out using a format known as a Focused Group Meeting, and this time is thethird time the Meeting has been held. It was initially intended to carry out the activities in combination
with those in Lao PDR in November of the previous year, but due to the effect of the great flooding in
Bangkok in the autumn, the area still had not recovered by November. We therefore decided topostpone the activities together with those of Lao PDR until January of this year. It was intended tohold the Focused Group Meeting in Thailand on the first day and then hold a Seminar on the second
day that would combine an introduction to Japanese high-efficiency energy conservation technology
and products with an introduction to Thai Best Practice cases. The former introduction was to havebeen attended by member companies of JASE-W. However, when we confirmed the recovery situationin Thailand close to the end of last year, we found that the companies who were supposed to attend theseminar were still occupied with the recovery work and would apparently be unable to attend. In
addition, we found that the supporting contact organization, the Ministry of Energy (DEDE), was also
very busy with the recovery work so we decided to cancel the Seminar on the second day. Instead, we
visited the Ministry of Industry (DIP) to carry out a hearing concerning the second judging results ofAwards system, reflected the usage of the four handbooks, and the plans for the future.
2. Focused Group Meeting (FGM): January 16
The FGM this time took place in the 11th floor main conference room of the DEDE building. Apartfrom the DEDE members, there were persons related to ECCT and FTI, consultants, and ESCO
companies. Apart from ECCJ and ACE members, 20 persons had gathered for the Meeting. Although
the implemented contents are given in the Agenda in Attached Materials III-2-4-1, they are specificallyexplained below.
(1) Greetings and Self-introductions: DEDE’s Mr. Danai Egkamd kindly gave the greetings and acted
as moderator for the first half. DEDE’s Mr. Sarat introduced the fact that the gathered members
would be divided into three groups consisting of DEDE, the consultant company, and ESCO
company members. Note that after giving explanations in English, Mr. Sarat supplemented his
explanation in Thai, as apparently some participants were not proficient in English.
(2) Participants:<1> DEDE: Mr. Danai Egkamd; Director, Bureau of Energy Regulation and Conservation (BERC)(Mr. Prasert Sinsukprasert, Director of Energy Regulation Division (Greetings only))
Ms. Amaraporn Achavangkool; Senior Scientist, BERC
Mr. Sarat Prakobchart, Senior Engineer, BERC
Mr. Manaswee Hakeme, Bureau of Energy Human Resource Development and others
totaling 10 persons<2> Consultant: Mr. Phongjaroon Srisovanna, Executive Director, ECCT (Energy Conservation
Center, Thailand)
Mr. Hin Navawongse; Vice Chairman Executive Committee of FTI (Federation ofThailand Industry)
Mr. Daecha Tunmeesuk, Lecturer, Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology, and others
totaling 6 persons<3> ESCO: Mr. Phisist Chang Outis, Attain Engineering & Energy Co., Ltd.
Mr. Phong Luangsangthong, BTM Engineering Co., Ltd.

III-44

Ms. Angsumon Fakcharoenphol, Energy Quality Service Co., Ltd., and others totaling 4
persons<4> ACE: Mr. Christopher Zamora, Manager
Mr. Junianto M, IT Specialist<5> ECCJ: Mr. Yutaka Ogura, Mr. Fumio Ogawa, Mr. Takashi Sato
(3) Lecture 1: Outline of Updated ASEAN Energy Management System 2011-2012 (ECCJ, Mr.
Yutaka Ogura): Used the same version that was used in Lao PDR. Extracts are explained.
<1> Q&A-1: The contents of the three types of handbooks (TEM, TEEI, and EEH) are slightly old.
Based on the experiences in the DEDE Training Center, revisions were made. (ECCT, DEDE)-> If you can provide us with the details, we would like to translate them into English andrevise the handbooks. (ECCJ)<2> Q&A-2: Does your request to further increase the numbers of applications for the ASEAN
Awards also apply to Thailand? (FTI) -> Because Thailand is submitting a sufficient number ofapplications compared to other countries, we are saying “more” to the other countries.
<3> Q&A-3: No Cost/Low Cost Best Practices are significant for the dissemination of Best Practicetechnologies. In contrast to large companies with ample funds, it will be necessary for small
and medium companies to be able to purchase high-efficiency technologies at low cost (FTI) ->Manufacturers of high-efficiency technologies and equipment including Japanese companies
well understand the market needs. Efforts will be required to provide products that match thespecifications of small and medium companies.
<4> Q&A-4: Although data collection is alsoimportant, it will be effective to show more basic
knowledge of the EMHB such as PDCA and QCC, and to show problem examples.
Explanation of the KAIZEN System would also be good. Although there are many small andmedium enterprises (SME), because they have little funds and small budgets, more support will
be required from this point of view. (Thai-Nichi Institute) -> This could certainly be carried out
in the PROMEEC EM Project, but because it can be implemented in Thailand itself, we are notcarrying it out. Further, regarding the basic knowledge tools, if we include detailed descriptionsin the EMHB, the book will become thicker and harder to use. So the introduction is limited toa certain extent and documents, and training courses are separately prepared for persons
wishing to learn more. (ECCJ) -> In Thailand, the National Guideline of EM has been created.
Although large companies are subject to the EC Act, the treatment of SMEs is still insufficient.
It will be necessary to become more focused. (DEDE)<5> Q&A-5: While large companies have adequate investment budgets and staff, SMEs also have a
20% subsidy system (ESCO). In DEDE Training courses, e-learning is provided for SMEs
(DEDE) -> In India also, an EC Act called DC (designated consumers) is regulating large
companies, but this does not cover SMEs. There is a request from the Indian government, BEE(Bureau of Energy Efficiency), regarding the introduction of SGA/TEM to support SMEs,
which we are currently assisting. (ECCJ)<6> Q&A-6: In the ASEAN Award submissions, there have been none for Industries (in S&M
category) for two years. How should we encourage submissions? (FTI) -> Regarding thepromotion of submissions, DEDE is conducting discussions, so we request their assistance.
(ECCJ) -> SMEs do not have much time or budget for preparing submissions. We would like todispatch persons to SMEs to offer assistance. (DEDE) -> Couldn’t the Awards be divided into
more categories and levels to make it easier for SMEs to participate? -> We have this intention,
and we have already made more categories. (DEDE, ECCJ)

III-45

(4) Lecture 2: Updates on the Development of PROMEEC Energy Management Tools (ACE, Mr.
Junianto) The same version was used as in Lao PDR, and extracts were explained.
<1> Q&A-7: Is there a large demand for the ASEAN EM Service? (DEDE) -> There are requests
for Energy Services to be made available in each country. (ACE)<2> Q&A-8: Is the ASEAN EM Service already finished? (DEDE) -> We are currently waiting for
feedback. It is being prepared offline. When completed, it will be put online. (ACE)<3> Q&A-9: What are the benefits of registering in the ASEAN EM Service? -> Promotion ofimage in the ASEAN region, and feedback to your business. (ACE)(5) Lecture 3: Information Analysis to Ease Dissemination of Awarded Cases from ASEAN EnergyAwards (ECCJ, Takashi Sato) The same version was used as in Lao PDR, and extracts wereexplained.
<1> Q&A-10: Although we know about QCC and KAIZEN, what is “Mottainai”? (ECCT) -> InThai, “Mottainai” (“What a waste!”) would be “shiadai”, and an example would be eating
everything without leaving any waste at all. It is a movement advocated by Ms. Wangari
Maathai in Africa, who was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize for it.
<2> Q&A-11: In the Best Practice case analysis results, are there any recommendations for
Thailand? (DEDE) -> Although there are no particular recommendations for Thailand, thedissemination of energy conservation among SMEs (small and medium enterprises) is an issue
in Japan too. Because each country seems to be in the same situation, it would be good forcountries to refer to theBest Practice cases in small and medium enterprises.
<3> Q&A-12: Regarding the energy conservation measures implemented in TIP (Toshiba
Information Philippines), how many years will be required to recover the investment? (DEDE)-> Although it is not described in this material, it will be about four years at the longest. -> Four
years would be no problem. (DEDE)<4> Q&A-13: How should energy conservation be carried out in an automatic line (in a solvent
cleaning process)? (Consultant) -> For the energy conservation in individual production lines, itwill be important to observe the actual situation of the production line together with the workers.
It is normal to first carry out energy conservation for the utility facilities before the production
facilities.
(6) Lecture 4: Energy Management Handbook and other Tools (ECCJ, Mr. Yutaka Ogura) The sameversion was used as in Lao PDR, and extracts were explained.
(7) Lecture 5: Harmonization of ISO 50001 and EMHB (ECCJ, Mr. Yutaka Ogura) The same version
was used as in Lao PDR, so extracts are explained.
<1> Q&A-14: In Thailand, there is also a move to implement ISO 50001. DEDE is working on the
AEMAS Energy Manager system , and Ms. Amaraporn received training and examinations the otherday. (DEDE)(8) Lecture 6: Japanese Experience of Energy Saving after Huge Disaster (ECCJ, Mr. Yutaka Ogura)
The same version was used as in Lao PDR, and extracts were explained.
<1> Q&A-15: For the electric power shorttage countermeasures, isn’t renewable energy being
urgently utilized? (DEDE) -> Although renewable energy in Japan was formerly only utilizedfor 1% of the total, there is a plan to increase this by gradually shifting from nuclear power inthe future. -> We heard that Japan has a plan to utilize solar power from space. (DEDE) -> Wehave no knowledge of that. -> How about the utilization of clean coal technology? (DEDE) ->Japan is placing emphasis on clean coal technology development, and there is a pilot plant, but
no working plant yet. Technical cooperation is also being carried out overseas.

III-46

<2> Q&A-16: The various types of electricity-saving measures devised in Japan may also be usefulin Thailand following the flooding disaster, so we would like to investigate the measures.
(DEDE)(9) Discussion 1: Discussion on the Utilization of PROMEEC EM Tools; Initially, time was allotted
separately, but there were many Q&As following the lectures each time. Some of these covered
the contents that we had planned to speak about, so the time that would have been spent
discussing these points again was discontinued. The questions for each explanation have alreadybeen introduced above.
(10) Discussion 2: An exchange of opinions was carried out between two persons from DEDE (Ms.
Amaraporn and Mr. Sarat), ACE and ECCJ concerning future cooperation and the directions of
the PROMEEC Project<1> Improve Enhancement Implementation Program: Some countries are advanced and should
assist other countries. Interactive involvement of ASEAN countries. The non-advanced
countries are Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar and Vietnam, while others
are advanced, but there is some sensitivity. Could there also be a dispatch of experts fromThailand? (ACE)<2> New segment of PROMEEC: Even though there are requests for assistance in promoting
energy conservation in the transportation sector, the cooperation of METI/ECCJ was negative.
(ACE)<3> How about EE&C in the Power sector? Couldn’t ACE, ECCJ and experts from ASEAN
countries carry out energy conservation audits in the power generation sector? (ACE)<4> Summary & Post WS: Because this Workshop will be held on March 7-8, we would like tohave discussions on the next day, March 9, regarding the future PROMEEC Program, so could
you investigate this? (ACE)<5> Will you also consider the promotion of participation of SMEs in ASEAN Award Applications?
<6> The cooperation of Thailand is essential to realize the ASEAN EM Service trial operation, thebuilding of the e-Directory, and the collection of data such as EC handbooks. Although this isan extremely busy time for Thailand, we hope very much that you will carry out promotions sothat we can aim to achieve a certain amount of completion in the current fiscal year. (ECCJ)<7> It will be necessary also to consider incorporating Japanese energy conservation technology
and product business developments. (ACE)<8> Until now we have concentrated mainly on general technology, but from now on shouldn’t you
consider specific technology capacity building? (DEDE)<9> There was a request for “Problem Solving”, so could you also investigate this? -> Because thisresolving method is indicated by the Key Step Approach in the EMHB, we don’t think it will
be necessary to newly consider this. (ECCJ)<10> In Thailand, DEDE members committed themselves to creating the original version of the
EMHB. Since there are EM Standards, ISO 50001, and AEMAS, how are these four items
being positioned? (ECCJ) -> It is planned to integrate EMS with ISO 50001 in the future.
Eventually we would like to integrate the four into one standard. (DEDE)

III-47

Attached materials III-2-4-1: Agenda of Thailand Focused Group Meeting

AGENDA
Focused Group Meetingon“Promoting the Utilization of PROMEEC Energy Management Tools”
under
PROMOTION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION (PROMEEC) Project inEnergy Management
January, 16th 2012
Meeting Room Floor.11th , Building 7,
Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDE)
Objective:

08.30
09.00
09.15

-

09.45

-

10.15

-

10.45

-

11.00

-

11.45

-

12.00

-

1. To promote the utilization of PROMEEC energy management tools among local
agencies
2. To collect feedback and recommendation from local Stakeholders
09.00
Registration
09.15
Greeting and Introduction
09.45
Outline of Updated ASEAN Energy Management System 2011-2012
Presented By Energy Conservation Center of Japan (ECCJ
10.15
Updates on the Development of PROMEEC Energy Management Tools,
Presented By ACE
10.45
Information Analysis to Ease Dissemination of Awarded Cases from ASEAN
Energy Awards, Presented By ECCJ
11.00
Harmonization of ISO 50001 and ASEAN Energy Management Handbook,Presented By ECCJ
11.45
Discussion on the utilization of PROMEEC Energy Management Tools- Comment and recommendation from local agencies- Contribution to be delivered- Proposal of new initiatives
12.00
Japanese Experience of Energy Saving after Hugh Disaster
Presented By ECCJ
12.15
Wrap-up / Closing

III-48

III-3. Activity Results in Each Country and Outcomes
III-3-1. Summary of Results of Implementing Intensive Seminar-Workshops, Training,
Company Visits and Research Forums
As a result of implementing the activities described above in each country, it was possible to achieve
the following key major results contributing to constructing the ASEAN Energy Management System.
(1) As shown in Table III-3-1-1, many participants took part, totaling 128 people. Regarding theactivities in this project and the ASEAN Energy Management System functions and programs,
participants could gain a wide understanding and be interested in the contents. In addition,
participants could also gain understanding of the usefulness of the energy management tools thathave been prepared in the system, such as through experiencing Group Work.
(2) As shown in Table III-3-1-2, 105 persons in the three countries participated in the Training for
utilizing the Energy Management Handbook, including persons related to pioneer companies
introducing and using the Energy Management Handbook. Participants gained understanding of
methods of using contents including the Energy Management Handbook, activity policies, andtools such as the In-house Database through the Workshops which provided experience of GroupWork for implementing case study based on improvement activity cases of pioneering companies.
(3) In addition to the above, visits were made to four factories, buildings, and related institutions inthree countries, where introductions were given to this project’s activity contents, their meaning,
and to the ASEAN Energy Management System and its functions, programs and tools. At thesame time, opinions were exchanged and advice was given relating to issues concerning energy
conservation in factories through visiting factories and buildings, and requests were made forsupport in the future at the same time. In the majority of the companies and organizations visited,support was provided by persons who had participated in the Intensive Seminar-Workshops andTraining.
(4) By carrying out the above activities, the participants in the Workshops and the visited companies
gained interest in participating in the project activities, so that the number of companies prepared
to cooperate in the future has been further increased.
(5) As a result of the above, the Network of Cooperators among companies, organizations, andrelated people in the ASEAN countries further increased. Particularly as shown in Table III-3-3,
we would like to emphasize the point that a total of 121 government institutions, implementing
organizations, and companies have been visited in the eight years since the start of this project in
2004, gaining many cooperators.
(6) In addition, the Research Forum in Japan was not carried out in the current fiscal year. Although
this was influenced by budgetary reductions, in the future we will consider the implementation as
required.

III-49

Country Visited
Myanmar
Malaysia
Lao PDR
ThailandNo. of Participants
31
36
41
20
128

Total No.

Table III-3-1-1: Number of Participants in Intensive Seminar -Workshops according to Country

Visited Country
Myanmar
Malaysia
Lao PDR
Total No.

No. of Participants
32
37
36
105

Table III-3-1-2: Number of Participants in Training Utilizing Energy Management Handbook
according to Country

Government Ministries andAgencies-related
Government-related Organizations(Electric Power Companies andState-run Companies)
Implementing Organizations
Industry Groups
Education and ResearchInstitutions including Universities
NGOs / NPOs
Companies(Factories and Buildings) and
ESCO Companies
Total

Brunei
Darussalam

Cambodia

3

1

2

1

2

1

3

0

3

2

1

0

1

0

0

3

0

4

1

2

0

0

0

0

1

12

7

16

13

Indonesia Lao PDR

Malaysia

Myanmar Philippines Singapore

Thailand

Vietnam

Total

1

2

3

19

1

0

0

1

9

0

2

0

2

5

16

0

0

1

1

0

1

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

11

11

4

1

7

0

8

9

70

19

13

10

3

14

2

12

19
Grand
Total

Table III-3-1-3: Classification and Accumulated Totals of Visited Companies and Organizations

III-50121

III-3-2. Activities relating to the Dissemination of the Energy Management Handbook
Through promoting the following activities in the current fiscal year in a continuation of the previous
year, Training was implemented based on the introduction and dissemination of the finalized ASEAN
version Energy Management Handbook. Regarding the revisions required to match the conditions andrequirements in each country including the translation to each country’s language, translations to local
languages in Myanmar and Cambodia were promoted in the current fiscal year. Further, even in
Myanmar, which was implementing this project for the second time in a continuation from theprevious fiscal year, it is believed that interest in participating and supporting was gained and more
related persons could understand the Handbook contents through the Training.
1. Training relating to the Energy Management Handbook
As described in III-2 above, in this fiscal year, Training relating to the Energy Management Handbook
was implemented in the three countries of Myanmar, Malaysia, and Lao PDR. In this Training, highly
detailed explanations were given regarding the particularly important point of the Key Step Approachconcepts, and guidance was given including the practicality of developing these as SGA (Small Group
Activities).
The Training is a one-day course. The contents related to how to use the Energy Management
Handbook, and the course included detailed lectures on these utilization methods. As already reported,
the basic program was as the following.
(1) Lecture: Lecture on detailed contents and important guidelines of the Energy Management
Handbook(2) Workshop (Group Activities): One case study from each country was selected in each of theindustry and building sectors in the current year’s ASEAN Award Best Practice cases beforehand.
Copies were made for distribution on the day, and the following activities were implemented.
(a) Introduction of case study summaries(b) Based on the contents introduced above, participants learned activity contents throughevaluation according to the Key Step Approach management method introduced in the Energy
Management Handbook. Group Work was experienced relating to the abstraction of the good
points and advice of further improvements.
2. Myanmar
Continuing from the previous year, activities were again held in the political capital, Nay Pyi Taw, andthe majority of the participants were government-related. The English version of the Energy
Management Handbook was distributed to all the participants, and after giving an explanation,utilization of the handbook was encouraged. The English version proved to be no problem for theparticipants, but as expected, a Myanmar language version will be necessary to achieve dissemination,
so translation to the local languagehas been accomplished with trial printing by March 2012.
3. Malaysia
In Malaysia, this was the first time to hold the activities since the Focal Point contact organization hadchanged from the former Malaysia Energy Center (PTM) to the Ministry of Energy, Green Technology
and Water. However, mainly consisted of persons related to ministries, public institutions, anduniversities who were highly interested in energy management, participants enthusiastically listened toIII-51the lectures and participated in Group Activities.
4. Lao PDR
In Lao PDR, the activities were held in the local city Savannakhet where the project had never been
implemented before, but the Training on the second day was particularly favorable due to the printing
and distribution of the Energy Management Handbook which had already been translated to Laotian.
Further, in the Training using ASEAN Award Best Practice case studies, several persons who had
experience of activities conducted previously in the project and in the Japanese MTPEC(Multi-Country Training for Promotion of Energy Conservation) kindly participated in each group asadvisors. It can be said that a framework has been created that will allow activities to be carried out
independently.
5. Cambodia
Although no local activities relating to the project were carried out in the current fiscal year, requests
continue to be received to provide a version of the Energy Management Handbook translated to the
local language. However, in spite of this, sufficient budget could not be found and the condition has
not progressed as expected, so support for translation has been actually started and finished by March2012.

III-52

IV. Development of Functions to be equipped in the ASEAN Energy Management System and its
Operation
IV-1. Overview
Setting the goal of establishing and operating the basic functions of the ASEAN Energy Management
System by fiscal year 2009, the completion of the Step-1 System was targeted, but actually there has
been a slight delay and the system has not yet been finished. Possessing the basic functions, the Step-1
System is focusing on information supply functions, having the main items described below.
(1) Best Practices of Energy Management (Industries and Buildings)(2) Completed Energy Management Tools(3) Information System for Implementing Organization and Customer Registration Search
In order to gather and provide the information described above, the following programs and tools havebeen additionally developed and are actually operating. The current development situation is shown in
Table IV-1-1.
(1) Collection and dissemination of the Best Practices in Energy Management for Industries andBuildings
1) Planning, development and actual operation of the ASEAN Award of Best Practices in Energy
Management for Industries and Buildings
2) Preparation and operation of an official website to introduce award-winning practices (within
the website of the ASEAN Centre for Energy)(2) Energy Management Tools
1) ASEAN Energy Management Handbook (Finalized in fiscal year 2008)
2) In-house Database and Technical Directory (currently being improved and developed by
Major Industries and Buildings Projects)
3) Methods of utilizing the tools described above(3) Information System for Implementing Organization and Customer Registration Search
1) ASEAN Energy Management Service (Implementing Organization and Customer Registration
Search System)
Currently, 17 companies from eight countries have been registered as implementing
organizations, and promotion of additional registration to each implementing organizations isbeing carried through the Focal Points in each country.
With the exception of the actual operation of the ASEAN Energy Management Service, the items
described above have been completed and are already in actual operation. Regarding the ASEAN
Energy Management Service, registration of 17 organizations from eight countries has been completed
up till now. Although it is difficult for countries in which there are no applicable organizations, it will
be necessary to create an environment of easy use for the customers, and countries that do have theseorganizations should promote as many as registration as possible.
In addition, investigation of the functions that should be added to the Step-2 System, and investigationof additional programs and tools that should be added to improve and complete the Step-1 System arebeing carried out.
Specifically, it was confirmed that the requirements for the Step-2 System major additional functions
should be the installation of service provision functions supporting the implementation of energy
conservation, and the establishing of a “One Stop to System” that aims to improve the ease of use for
ASEAN Energy Management System users.
Regarding the energy conservation implementation support service, investigation is being carried out
concerning the development of an “Advisory Service System” that would allow the provision of

IV-1

specific advice. This should be developed by encouraging the registration of specialists in the ASEAN
region and Japan and allowing them to provide advice and answer questions from users on a voluntarybasis.
Concerning these two functions, as considerable effort and costs will be required for their construction,priority will be placed on the completion of the Step-1 functions.
Further, in order to complete the tools, the collection and preparation of English versions of technicalhandbooks (including thermal energy efficiency improvement handbooks and electrical energy
efficiency improvement handbooks), and the supply of information including the collection of basic
data from the information supplying system of manufacturers of energy conservation technology andequipment and ESCO companies (e-Directory: Voluntary registration by manufacturers using theInternet) is continuing to be investigated.

IV-2

PROMEEC (Energy Management)
ASEAN Energy Management System: Functions and Programs /Tools

Functions
1. Sharing Information
2. Service Provision
3. Rule / Scheme andPrograms and Tools
Conditions for 1&2
1. PROGRAMS
1-1. Award System of EM Best Practices
Done/ Improvement
National Competition(Depends on Countries)(Collection and Dissemination of Best Practices)
1-2. Registration of ASEAN-Japan Experts
Under Study
Under Study(Voluntary Self-Registration)(Advisory Services)
1-3. Expansion of Network ASEAN Cooperators' Network
On-going
Voluntary Based on(Cooperation to Activities and Information Sources)
Individual Conditions
2. SUB-SYSTEMS and TOOLS
2-1. Information System to Disseminate (ACE / ECCJ Web.)No Rules and Conditions(1) Best Practices in Energy Management
Done / Improvement
Website with Accesses(2) ASEAN Energy Management Handbook
Done / More Translation Seminar-Workshop(3) In-house Database (Standardized Data Files)
Developing (Partially Done)Training(4) Technical Directory
Developing (Partially Done)
2-2. Handbooks(1) ASEAN Energy Management Handbook
Done / More Translation
One-day Training ** Training : Actual Use(2) Thermal Energy Efficiency Improvement handbook
Finalized(3) Electrical Energy Efficiency Improvement Handbook
Finalized
2-3. ASEAN Energy Management Service to Use Implement. Orgs. Ready for Trial
Bridging Stakeholders in Security / National Rule
(Depends on Organization)(Bridging Implementing Organizations and Customers)(Registration in System)
ASEAN
2-3. Directories(1) Directory of ESCOs
Under Preparation
Website with Accesses
Under Study(2) Directory of Suppliers (Equipment & Tech.)
Under Preparation(Bridging with Customers) (Volunary Self-Registration)
Table IV-1-1: Functions, Programs and Tools of the Energy Management System

IV-3

IV-2. Operation of the Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industries
and Buildings
Operation of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industries andBuildings first began in the latter half of fiscal year 2006, and in the current fiscal year the 5th Awards
were completed in September 2011. Based on the actual results and analysis of the award-winning
practices in the 5th Awards, the call for submissions for the 6th Awards is being carried out fromJanuary 2012.
IV-2-1. Results of the 5th Awards
1. The 5th Meeting of the Board of Judges (BOJ-EM) for the ASEAN Best Practices Competition for
Energy Management
Regarding the applications in the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for
Industries and Buildings that were sent in to the ACE Secretariat by each country’s Focal Point by the
beginning of May 2011, a total of 12 persons gathered in Singapore on May 23 and 24,was andcarried out judgement. The 12 persons consisted of the seven members of the Board of Judges of theASEAN Award System of Best Practice in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings(BOJ-EM) from the various ASEAN countries except Brunei Darussalam and the Philippines, ECCJ
observers and three persons from the ACE Secretariat.
The current fiscal year marked the 5th Awards, and submissions from the seven countries of thePhilippines, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, Singapore, Malaysia and Brunei Darussalam were received,
consisting of 12 cases in the Buildings sector, 8 cases in the Industries sector, and 4 cases in theSpecial Submissions sector. As a result of the judging over the two-day period, one case study fromeach of the Large-scale Buildings sector and Large-scale Industries sector, and from the Small andMedium-scale Buildings sector were selected as the winning Awards, and three cases wereadditionally set as winning Awards in the Special Submissions. As for the countries of winners, 2 cases
were from Thailand and 4 from the Philippines. In addition, Indonesia, Malaysia Philippines andThailand were selected as Best Practice cases in the Buildings sector, and Singapore and Thailand
were selected in the Industries sector. Due to a revision of the judging methods this time, the awardingof multiple winners in the same sector which had been carried out last year was discontinued. Further,although classification of the Industries field according to the scope of the annual energy consumption
had been carried out from the previous fiscal year in both the Industries and Buildings sectors in orderto broaden the opportunities for small and medium scale companies to receive awards, there were no
applications for small and medium scale businesses in the Industries sector.
(1) Details of Applications
Buildings Sector (9 Case Studies)
Small and Medium Scale Buildings (Annual electricity usage amount less than 2000 MWh) (6 case studies)
Indonesia
Adhi Graha
PT. Kaltim Prima Coal building
Malaysia
Green Energy Office
Philippines
Meralco Management and Leadership Development Center (MMLDC)
VietnamHo Chi Minh TV
RMIT International University
Large Scale Buildings (Annual electricity usage amount 2000 MWh or more) (6 case studies)
Brunei
Brunei Shell Petroleum
Philippines
JP Morgan Chase & Co.

IV-4

Tower One and Exchange PlazaCentral World
National Electronics and Computer Technology Center
Vietnam
Big C Hypermarket
Industries Sector (8 case studies)
Small and Medium Scale Factories (Annual fuel consumption amount less than 10 million MJ): No entries
Large Scale Factories (Annual fuel consumption amount 10 million MJ or more)
ThailandIndonesia

PT. Semen Baturaja (Cement plant)

Philippines

TI Philippines Inc. Bagio (IT equipment plant)
Toshiba Information Equipment (Phils), Inc. (IT equipment plant)
Singapore
Glaxo Welcome Manufacturing Pte. Ltd. (Chemicals plant (Pharmaceuticals))
Pfizer Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. (Chemicals plant (Pharmaceuticals))
ThailandCharoen Pokphand Foods Public Co. (Frozen foods plant)
NOK Precision Component (Thailand) Ltd. (Electronic precision parts plant)
VietnamGoshi Thang Long Auto Part Limited Liability Company (Automobile parts plant)
Special Submissions Sector
Indonesia
PT Semen Tonasa
Philippines
Toshiba Information Equipment (Phil.) Inc.
UP Ayala TechnoHub.
ThailandToyota Motor Thailand Co. Ltd.
(2) Details of Awarded Cases
Buildings Sector
Small and Medium Scale Buildings (Annual electricity usage amount less than 2000 MWh)
WinnerMeralco Management and Leadership Development Center Score(MMLDC), Philippines
This is a training facility that includes accommodation functions.
Concerning the energy conservation and resource-saving carried out
using unique activities, targets are being established and many
improvements are being promoted. Regarding energy conservation,a reduction of 23% was realized over a five-year period.
1st Runner-Up
PT. Kaltim Prima Coal building, Indonesia
Score
This is a successful example of office building energy management.
Due to energy conservation promotion activities including energy
conservation promotion campaigns, creation of standard operatingprocedures (SOP), introduction of equipment including wattmeters,
light sensors and timers, and the switching to high efficiency air
conditioning (split type) and high efficiency lamps, energy saving of
12.5% was realized in less than one year.
2nd Runner-Up
Green Energy Office, Malaysia
Score
Originally this was designed as a Zero Energy building, but evenwhen considering that PV (photovoltaic generation) is being used,
the BEI could only realize 60 kWh/m2. (The supply from thephotovoltaic generation was a maximum of 35 kWh/m2/year.) Using
energy management, various types of energy conservation
improvements are being carried out to achieve the target of 30
kWh/m2/year.
Large Scale Buildings (Annual electricity usage amount of 2000 MWh or more)
WinnerCentral World, Thailand
Score
This is a successful example of energy management in a large-scale
shopping mall having a total floor area of 500,000 m2. By improving
the air conditioning system, introducing inverters, using
high-efficiency lighting, and improving the roof thermal insulation
performance, energy conservation of 9.2% was realized in a
two-year period. There is also a complete plan for realizing energy
conservation improvements in the future.
1st Runner-Up
JP Morgan Chase & Co. Philippines
Score
Energy management in a 23-story office building where 6800
people work. In 2009, a 20% energy conservation target over 5
years was established, and the “Kill-a-Watt” Program (derived from“kilowatt”) is being implemented. Energy conservation of 2.5% was

IV-5realized in the first fiscal year. Items such as the participation of all
employees, high-efficiency operation of air conditioning,
introduction of LEDs, and improvement of lighting equipment isbeing implemented.
2nd Runner-Up
National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, Score
ThailandThis is a successful case study of energy management in a researchbuilding. Due to large numbers of small-scale improvements in the
education of personnel, equipment operation management, airconditioning, lighting, and elevator facilities, energy conservation of
6.5% was realized over a two-year period.
Industries Sector (Large Scale: Annual energy consumption amount of 10 million MJ or more)
WinnerToshiba Information Equipment (Phil.) Inc., Philippines Score(Electronics plant (Hard disc manufacturing))
Due to the improvement of the plant chillers, introduction ofadsorption chillers which utilize waste heat recovered from thegenerators, and introduction of LED lighting, energy conservationof 23.28% (intensity) was realized in a one-year period. The plant is
implementing Japanese-style energy management.
1st Runner-Up
Glaxo Wellcome Manufacturing Pte. Ltd., Singapore Score(Chemicals plant (Pharmaceuticals))
Due to energy conservation activities linking the manufacturing
sites with the Administration Division, many improvement
proposals have been implemented (including improvement of the air
conditioners, acquisition/analysis/reporting of detailed energy data,
and the introduction of other high-efficiency equipment), and energy
conservation (consumption amount) of 20% has been realized over athree-year period.
2nd Runner-Up
NOK Precision Component (Thailand) Ltd., Thailand Score(Electronic precision parts plant)
Due to Small Group Activities (including TEM, 5S, Kaizen, QCC,
and TMP), many energy conservation improvement proposals havebeen implemented, and energy conservation of 17% (intensity) was
realized in a seven-year period. The plant is implementing
Japanese-style energy management, and training of employees isalso being fully implemented.
Special Submissions Sector
WinnerToshiba Information Equipment (Phil.) Inc., Philippines
Yes- , NoCogeneration by an adsorption chiller utilizing waste heat from thegenerator.
UP Ayala TechnoHub., Philippines
Yes- , NoHigh efficiency local heating supply system supporting 10 blocks ofbuildings by controlling the number of operating units for eightchillers.
Toyota Motor Thailand Co. Ltd., Thailand (Automobile Yes- , Nomanufacturing)Due to operation improvements in the oven system of the painting
process, an energy conservation effect of 8.19% was achieved.

(*)

Each member of the Board of Judges evaluated cases out of 100 points. Each of these point
numbers was then normalized to a maximum of 20 points, and the total of the points became thescore. Because the eight judges were not allowed to evaluate the case studies from their own
countries, the maximum score was 140 points (20 points x 7 persons). However, since there
were also entries this time from countries (the Philippines and Brunei Darussalam) whose Boardof Judges members did not attend, in these cases eight judges carried out the evaluation, making
a maximum number of 160 points. Accordingly, the rank was determined by the average points(maximum of 20 points). Further, in the Special Submissions sector, the Board of Judges gave a
Yes or No evaluation regarding whether the proposed technology would be applicable in the
ASEAN region and would give improved results. When two-thirds or more of the judges give a
Yes evaluation, the case is awarded as the winner. In addition, each judge was not allowed toIV-6

give an evaluation vote for their own country’s case study.
Note that the detailed application materials for the 24 cases described above are stored in the TechnicalCooperation Department of International Cooperation Division, ECCJ .
(3) Comments by the Board of Judges<1> Increase in the Number of Submitted Case Studies
This is the fifth time that the Awards competition has been held (one time each year), and the numberof cases submitted this time was 24, a comparatively large increase over the previous 4 Awards. The
various ASEAN countries are appreciating the importance of energy management, and some countries
are implementing similar competitions domestically, showing the favorable influence of the Awards.
<2> Contents of the Documents Submitted in the Applications
Concerning the contents described in the submitted cases, all of the judges expressed the opinion that
there had been a great improvement, partly due to the effect of the improvement measures in the
Research Forum that was held in Japan in November 2010. In addition, with regard to energy
management, the judges had the impression that on average the level is improving.
<3> Production of Documents based on the Fill-in Instruction
Some of the aaplocations are not being based on thefill-in instruction, and we would request each of
the Focal Points to clearly indicate to persons making applications that their submissions should bebased on the fill-in instruction. In particular, some entries insufficiently described the long-term plansfor energy conservation promotion and the actual methods being used to realize energy conservation.
<4> Improvement of Evaluation Methods
The number of entries in the current fiscal year was 24, so that in order to carry out assessment in one
and half day, each case had to be completely understood and evaluated in 20 minutes. However, somejudges commented that 20 minutes was still too short and 30 minutes would be required. Further, toallow more precise assessment, it was confirmed that improvement of the explanation methods (suchas explaining the transition of energy efficiency by using tables), improvement of the scoring methods,
and improvement of the guidelines for carrying out the assessment would be necessary. These opinions
had also been indicated at previous meetings of the Board of Judges, and although improvements canbe seen each year, even more improvement was required.
<5>Publicize the Award System throughout the ASEAN Region
Because some ASEAN countries are implementing this system in their own countries, and sincedissemination activities for this system are being carried out in the PROMEEC Project activities,
public knowledge of this system is continuing to grow. However, regarding the countries that did not
make submissions this time, the Focal Points should make more efforts topublicize this system. In
addition, even from a meaning of providing an incentive to send in submissions to this system,
couldn’t we also consider establishing a system in the future in which awarded cases would receive
favorable financing?
<6> Implementation of Awards Systems in Each Country

IV-7

Some countries such as the Philippines and Thailand have already introduced this system, andSingapore also began using this system from this year. We confirmed that implementing this Awards
system domestically in each ASEAN country would result in raising the level of the ASEAN Awards
system.

2. Results of Analyzing the Best Practice Cases
Regarding the 24 cases submitted in the Buildings sector and Industries sector for the 5th ASEAN Best
Practices Competition for Energy Management, analysis was carried out from the following
viewpoints concerning the included improvement factors.
(1) Project activities(2) Main improvement points(3) Amount of energy conserved and the resulting economic efficiency(4) Investment amount(5) Possibility of dissemination
Each submitted case includes several improvement measures, and by creating a practical effect bythese measures, a large energy conservation effect is obtained. Accordingly, by analyzing these points,
it was possible to discover effective dissemination methods and additionally help to encourage
submissions of applications and improve the evaluation guidelines. The results were introduced at the
Intensive Seminar-Workshops and Focused Group Meeting held in four countries.
The details of the analysis results are shown in Tables IV-2-1, IV-2-2, and IV-2-3.
Among the applications submitted this time, some companies were actually visited to carry out
exchanges of opinions and give advice, and the companies that gave cooperation in the energy audit
actually tried to make improvements and kindly provided the results as cases. It is hoped that thesekinds of companies will increase in the future.

IV-8

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Submitted Case Studies (1) (Industries Sector 1)
Country Name of Company Sub-Industry
Indonesia

Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements

Annual EffectEconomy(Outline of Company)
Saved Energy
PT Semen Baturaja Cement(Name of Project) Energy Management for Productivity and 1) Total productive maintenance
Cost saving (US$)(PERSERO)
Manufactur Improvement in PT Semen Baturaja
2) Change the operation procedures at raw mill by3) 52,000
Number ofe(Outline) The commitment for energy efficiency andstopping equipment on peak load time4) 1,500,000
employees: 565
environment protection is as follows:
3) Variable speed drive(VSD) at cooler exhaust fan
Annual Electric* Establishment of Management Energy Committee, energy switching of electricity from diesel power plant to PLN
Consumption :efficiency program, cost reduction program4) Install additional equipment to facilitate the 3rd
85,935,000 kWh/y* Power management
component of cement mixture(2008)* Human resources development
5) Improved the overall equipment effectiveness* Increase production and use alternative raw materials* Add new cement mill and packing plant to increase capacity Short and long-term Plans includes:* Complete cement plant
1) Installation of recording system for power
distribution, VSD for fan grate cooler and dust
Production cost decreased by 4.4% (389,000 US$)
collector, power transformer
The company carries out TPM (Total Productive2) Cost reduction program program by reducing
Maintenance) convention to appreciate TPM circles thatclinker factor in dement to 80%
finished their program.
3) Optimization of electrical consumption for 3 plants
4) Use alternative raw material and fuelPhilippines TI Philippines Inc. - Semicondu (Name of Project) Energy Management Program - Mitigate
Baguioctor
the Climate change/ TI Philippines Inc. - Baguio
Number of(Outline) TIPI is continuously innovating its product andemployees: 2094
implementing programs to mitigate environmental aspect
Electricity :brought by the manufacturing of IC.
233,381,314 kWh/y
TIPI adpoted the TPM, Kaizen Blitz, 5S concept for
improvement, upgrade and replacement of inefficientmachinery.

1) Automatic (ATE) secondary controller elimination
2) Replacement of high specific power nitrogen plant3) Compressed dry air (CDA) piping modification4) Electro De-lonization (EDI) pretreatment upgrade5) Lighting diffuser upgrade
6) Purge conversion for test machine cold testing7) Containment of tester heat dissipation
8) Merging of exhaust main ducting9) Tester migration
With the company's active energy conservation program,10) Installation of variable speed drive (VSD)
consumption (kWhr/NUM) decreased by 11.3% from 2008 to compressor
2010.
11) Utilization of zero purge driver
20.4% reduction of energy consumption was realized in 2010. 12) Grinding DI reduction for Back grind machine13) Elimination of forming gas waste for copper
Short and long-term plans are as follows
bonding* Vacuum conversion of SPA tools
14) Eliminiation of secondary pump for back grin
* Manufacturing tester CDA auto shutoff during hithwastetemperature* CDA main line up-grade to reduce pressure drop

IV-9

Energy/Cost saving(kWhr/US$)
1) 234,416/11,394
2) 2,334,816/ 114,639
3) 1,857,995/ 91,228
4) 12,867/ 631.7
5) 51,120/ 2,510
6) 3,110,400/ 152,720.6
7) 95,040/ 4,666
8) 170,352/ 8,364
9) 4,087,661/ 200,704
10) 1,805,330/ 88,462
11) 662,400/ 32,524
12) 1,463/ 72
13) 1,475,139/ 178,389
14) 12,000/ 589

Investment Possibility to Others
Disseminate

Payback period(year)
3) 0.64) 0.02

Investment
cost (US$)3) 33,465
4) 37,176

Payback (year)
1) 0.01
3) 6.84) 4.35) 1.06) 1.07) 6.98) 0.012
10) 2.5
11) 2.3
13) 0.17
14) 0.20

Project cost(US$)1) 1003) 120,000.00
4) 2,700.00
5) 2,400.00
6) 160,000.00
7) 32,000.00
8) 100.00
10)
220,000.00
11) 75,000.00
13) 30,000.00
14) 120

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Submitted Case Studies (1) (Industries Sector 2)
Country Name of Company Sub-Industry

Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements(Outline of Company)
Philippines Toshiba Information Manufacturi (Name of Project) Toshiba Information Equipment (Phils.)
Equipment (Phils.) ng
Inc. Energy Management Practices
Inc.
(Outline) TIP is the largest Toshiba hard disk drive
Number of
manufacturer in the world, implementing energy programs toemployees: 7,600
improve production energy efficiency. These include:
Annual Electric* activity to maintain equipment efficiency
Consumption :* elimination and utilization of wasted energy
136,426,162 kWhr* production process modification(2010)* total redesign of chilled water system, power plant heatrecovery* efficiency improvement for lighting and AC

Investment measures(1) Chilled water system redesign(2) Renewable energy(2)-1 Powerplant heat recovery system(2)-2 Water treatment plant discharge reuse(3) Equipment conversion(3)-1 Compressed air system dryer conversion(3)-2 Vacuum pump conversion(4) Lighting system improvement(4)-1 High efficiency lighting installation(4)-2 Pull switch control(5) HVAC efficiency improvement
The measures resulted in a production energy rate reduction (5)-1AC efficiency improvementof 23.28% even with an increase of 42% production volume. (5)-2 AD regregerant conversion(5)-3 Exhaust inverter installation
Short and long term plans includes:* Chiller central control system/ Vacuum pump conversion/ Non-Investment measures
R22 AC conversion to RS44 regrigerant/ LED installation(1) HDD test process optimization* Solar power supply/ New heat run equipment/ Micro hydro (2) Production computer reduction
powerSingapore Glaxo Wellcome
Manufacturing Pte
Ltd
Number of
employees: 454
Annual ElectricConsumption :kWhrAnnual Effect
Saved Energy
EconomyAnnual energy saving(1) 12,284,006(2) 5,304,960(2)-1 4,268,160(2)-2 1,036,800(3) 673,920(3)-1435,456(3)-2 238,464(4) 52,272(4)-141,472(4)-2 10,800(5) 175,224(5)-1 31,316(5)-2 110,592(5)-3 33,316
Non-Investment
measures(1) 313,140(2) 3,583,008

Pharmaceut (Name of Project) Excellence in Energy Management at
Specific measures
Energy saving (MWh)/ical
Glaxo Wellcome Manufacturing Pte Ltd
1) Recirculation of air in hazardous area
Cost saving (US$)
Manufacturi (Outline) From 2007, energy usage is reduced annually more 2) Installation of energy management system(1) 519/ 109,000ngthan 5%. (5.2% for 2010).
3) Heat recovery for dehumidifier(2) 12,581/ 2.9M
4) Mist spray by condensate water(3) 683/ 143,000
293 energy projects were complete from 2002- 2010. The(4) 1,125/ categories of projects are as follows:
The framework for energy management includes:- Optimization & modification of ACMV system* Site leadership team (SLT): set energy reduction- Efficiency improvement of process cooling systemtarget- Replacement of hot & cold insulation* Cross functional energy management team:- Installation of high efficiency lighting system/motor /variable - monitor performance
speed drives- identify and evaluate energy efficiency technologies- Replacement of equipment with high efficiency types- plan and execute energy improvement projects- Installation of solar photovoltaic panel to harness renewable - organize campaigns to educate employees
energy* Engineering department: responsible for project- Usage of waste solvent for incinereator fuelimplementation, energy performance- Solvent waste recovery

IV-10

Investment Possibility to Others
Disseminate

ROI (year)(1) 2.9(2)-1 3.83(2)-2 0.04(3)-1 1.88(3)-2 2.74
(4)-1 2.76
(4)-2 1.52(5)-1 0.78
(5)-2 0.52
(5)-3 2.46

Investment
cost (US$)(1) 4.4 million(2)-1 2M(2)-2 4,500(3)-1 100,000(3)-2 80,000(4)-1 14,000(4)-2 2,000(5)-1 3,000(5)-2 7,000(5)-3 10,000

WinnerPayback (years)(1) 2.5(2) (3) 2.7(4) 0.76

Investment(S$)(1) 272,000(2) (3) 390,000(4) 178,400

1st runnerup

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Submitted Case Studies (1) (Industries Sector 3)
Country

Name of Company Sub-Industry
Name of Project / Activity(Outline of Company)
Singapore Pfizer Asia PacificPharmaceut (Name of Project) Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Pte Ltd
ical
Programme atPfizer Asia Pacific Pte Ltd
Number of(Outline) Since 2005, the company has achieved an
employees: 250
annual energy reduction of 5-10%.
Annual Electric
Key elements of the energy management program are
Consumption :- management support/ site energy team/ energy
kWhrperformance goal/ energy monitoring, analysis &reporting/ energy assessments/ utilities master planning/
benchmarking/ energy conservation process/ proactive
load management/ employee goals/ training/ raisingenergy awareness/ project implementation support/
capital project review/ new facilities/ innovative e energy
technologies/ regulatory awareness/ maintain energy
efficiency

ThailandKey Improvements
Measures
1) Installation of tri-generation plant to improve energy
efficiency
2) Installation of solar adsorption system
3) Recovery of exhaust cool air for AHUs
4) Optimization of chilled water system
5) Installation of cooling tower fan with high efficiency blade6) Installation of LED lights

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
EconomyInvestment Possibility to
Disseminate

Annual energy saving(MWh)/ cost saving (S$)(1) - / 1M
(2) 696/ 208,800(3) 223/ 28,929(4) 789/ 110,486(5) 235/ 42,000(6) 62/ 16,000

Management stategy- Promote energy saving ideas, technologies and innovations:CI program, RFT project & awareness communicaton- Share strategies & tools of energy efforts- Advocate the use of Green Building/ Energy & Climatechange principles- Apply latest technologies: Tri-generation, solar renewable,
LED- Partnership with governmen agencies: external energy
audit/ benchmarking- Increase recognition & communication of energy
achievements

Charoen Pokphand Agro & food (Name of Project) Energy Conservation in Charoen(2008)non-investment
energy saving (kWh)/
Payback (years)
Investment
Foods PCL.
Pokphand Foods PCL. (Nakhon Ratchasima)
1) Intake air controller 2) AC contoller 3) Hot water pumpcost saving (baht)(2008)-investment (baht)(Nakhon(Outline) The company's accomplishment can becontroller(2008)- non-investment 1) 0.2 2) 0.37 3)(2008)Ratchasima)concluded in 5 steps as follows:(2008)investment
1) 194,000/ 534,600 2) 4.73 4) 0.08 5) 0.35 investment
Number of1) Considers 3 beneficiaries from business opertion:1) Steam, thermal oil tube insulation 2) Automatic fan lairage 1,140,480/ 3,136,320 3) (2009)- investment 1) 66,060 2)
employees: 5053
nation, people and company
area 3) Conveyer inverter 4) Automatic water chil filling 5)
458,640/1,226,180
1) 0.17 3) 7.95
20,000 3)
Annual Electric
2) Maintains growth level and leadership in agro-industry Condensate return-investment(2010)- investment 45,000 4)
Consumption :and food industry(2009)non-investment
2) 19,754/ 54,298 3)1) 1.88 2) 0.89 3) 18,000 5)
39,777,783/
3) Focuses on innovative and environmental-friendly
1) Load air and water chiller centralization 2) Reduced
3456/ 9504 4) 84,618/
1.62 4) 2.25 5) 0.03 439,053
32,820,964 (kWhr)construction.
pressure air 3) Adjust air dryer sequence 4) Evaporative
232,700(2009)4) Offers processed chicken meat produced by advance condensor fan controlled 5) Reduce air leakage(2009)- non-investment
investment
and quality certificaiont technology(2009)investment
1) 439,200/ 1,212,192 2)
1) 17,460 3)
5) Rules of organization culture: embrace change, master 1)Thermal pump insulsation 2) Auto Drian (air compressor) 3) 770,560/ 194,746 3)
40,000learnign & sharing, innovation, etc.
Drum motor for conveyor
40,320/ 111,293 4)(2010)(2010)non-investment
126,144/ 348,157 5)
investment
The company uses 115kV, and helps save 86.38% of
1) Turn off mixer motor 2) Turn off mixer motor
177,072/ 455,075
1) 18,450 2)
total energy cost, 66.22% and 20.16% of refrigeration and (neautralization tank)- investment
160,000 3)
machines used in production process.
3) Stean boiler efficiency improvement by lean six sigma2) 5423/ 14,967 3)1824/
137,901(2010)investment
50344)94,160 5)
Plans for the future include installation and introduction of 1) Step dimiming controller 2) Vacuum pump centralization 3) (2010)- non-investment
8,990
economizer steam boiler/ VSD chill water plate pump/Temp. controller for knifes tank 4) Steam tube insulation 5)
1) 23,652/ 71,666
flash tank steam boiler/ VSD air compressor/ bio gass
Reduce puller size for clarifier air compressor
2)11,826/ 35,833
wastewater plant/ bio mass boiler- investment
1) 3240/ 9821 2) 59,400/
179,982 5) 87,600/
265,428

IV-11

OthersTable IV-2-1: Analysis of Submitted Case Studies (1) (Industries Sector 4)
Country
Thailand

VietnamName of Company Sub-Industry
Name of Project / Activity
Key Improvements(Outline of Company)
NOK Precision
Electronic (Name of Project) Energy Conservation in NOK Precision (2008)non-investment
Component
precisionComponent (Thailand) Ltd. In Thailand
1) reduce lighting 2) opening-closing AD 3) turn off lighting(Thailand) Ltd. In
part(Outline) Energy management program is implemented (2008)investment
Thailandsince 2004. Small Group Activities (SGA) includes 5S,
1) auto lighting at toilet 2) plastic curtain 3) waste heat
Number of
Kaizen, QCC, TEM, TPM, etc.. SGA emphasizes
recovery 4) window film 5) timer 6) VSD 7) insulation
employees: 1893
awareness and performance level for optimizen(2009)non-investment
Annual Electric
resources, utilization and sustanable energy consumption. 1) program for disabled lift 2) shut off dozing pump/ air dryer/
Consumption :AHU/ cooling tower 3) raise chilled water temp. 4) reduce
20,758,360 kWhrAt 2010, production amount increased 386% compared to compressed air 5) extend period of back wash 6) reduce
2003, as energy consumption growth was 246% due tolighting
TEM programs (111projects and 55 measures).
(2009)investment
Energy saving programs for 7 years reflects to 17% of1) change to switch power supply/ refrigerent of AC 2) install
total energy consumption or 397 thousand USD$.
timer of AC and DI water system/ pull switch(2010) investment<Knowledge management measures>1) reduce blower speed 2) install partition for separated heat* install plastic curtain at warehousezone/ AC 3) epair exhaust duct and valve* install chimney at condensing unit
* reduce electrical energy for AC(2011- planned) investment- waste heat recovery from oven C-Sun
1) VSD for chiller pump 2) heat reduction for chiller 3) auto
- install partition for separated heat zone
lighting 4) change AC chiller of AHU- reduce blower speed, AHU
The company invested 3.4 M bahts from 2004 to 2010 andpayback period less than 2 years. Total Energy Management
Committee has been authorized to consider for special
budget by
1) found energy & resources lost2) should not affect health, safety and environments3) related to company activity such as TPM4) conform with new law and regulations
Goshi Thang Long Motorbike & (Name of Project) Understanding and awareness of(2008)
Auto Part Limited
auto parts saving and using energy efficiency
1) reduce boiler pressure 2) inspection & regularLiability Company(Outline) The energy consumption per product decreased maintenance for machinery 3) regulation of electrical devices
Number offrom 52,259.64 kJ (2008) to 47,719.21 kJ (2009).
4) specified temperature of AC 5) management of power
employees: 1150
The target is to reduce the rate (kWh/set) by 10% per
consumption 6) separate illuminator roads 7) improve water
Annual Electricyear.
supply system 8) replace bulbs 9) improve ventilation system
Consumption :10) install inverter for motor
12,060,600.00 kWhrThe implemenetation of 5S creates the best working(2009)
environment for employees and equipment, improving
1) check of air, CO2, pipe system 2) reduce unnecessary
awareness on best operations of equipment
bulbs 3) change working hours 4) reduce pressure of aircompressor 5) improve vessel control system 6) improve
Genaral electricity-saving equipment, Enerkeeper, waswater supply system 7) improve lighting system 8) insulate
installed to balance the phase of electrical network insteam piping system 9) install power monitoring system 10)
factory. It saves about 8% power consumption,
install "Enerkeeper"
equivalent to 960,000 kWh/year.

IV-12

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
Economyenergy saving (kWh)/cost saving (baht)(2008)non-investment:
62,159/ 186,477
investment: 96,335/
285,595(2009)non-investment:
909,359/ 2,726,295
investment: 36,708/
110,125(2010) investment:
695,042/ 2,085,125

Payback (year)(2008) 0.71
(2009) 0.002(2010) 0.25

Investment Possibility to
Disseminate

OthersInvestment(baht)(2008)
333,566(2009) 6,734(2010)
519,170

2nd
runner-up(2011)
718,500(2011) 182,200/ 546,602

Energy saving (kWh)(2008)
3) 417,000 6) 2,157 7)
1,295 8) 10,383 9)
67,392 10) 57,708(2009)
2) 10,782.72 4) 20,800
5) 21,475 6) 85,587.8 7)
540 10) 960,000

Payback period(2008) (VND)(year)
6) 1,540,000(2008) (VND)
7) 185,000 8)6) 0.82 7) 0.16 8) 6,864,000 9)
0.8 9) 0.26 10) 3.03 15,000,000(2009)
10)5) 0.07 6) 0.11 7) 152,000,000
4.26 8) 0.3 10) 5.6 (2009)5) 1,320,000
6) 8,528,000
7) 2,000,000
8) 21,500,000
9)2,695,200,000
10)
4,705,993,000

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Submitted Case Studies (1) (Industries Sector Special Submissions 1)
Country Name of Company Sub-Industry
Indonesia(Outline of Company)
PT Sement
CementTonasaNumber of
employees:
Annual ElectricConsumption :kWhrName of Project / Activity

Key Improvements(Name of Project) Mangement Energy by Making Automation Automation of lighting
Lamps in the Sub Station Room based on ATmega8 - 16L
MicrocontrollerLighting control system is a method to extend lamp
(Outline) The management formed an energy management life and to reduce electrical energy consumption.
team to implement power management to get maximum
Motion detectors turn on and off the lamps
results and suitable production of CBP.
automatically.
Automation offlighting lamps is one of the development
The feature of the system is as follows:
programs.
* use hardware design consisting of microcontroller,
the sensor system as teh information unit, and relay
system that will function like a switch* use design software* implement the system in the sub station

Philippines Toshiba
Manufacturi (Name of Project) Toshiba Information Equipment (Phils.)
InformationngInc. Adsorption Chiller - Heat Recovery Systems
Equipment (Phils.)(Outline) Wasted heat on producing power and other utilities
Inc.
is recognized as an altenative enrgy source for production
Number of
expansion requirement.
employees: 7,600
TIP installed heat recovery equipment to recover the heat
Annual Electricfrom the diesel engine power plant to procure chilled water
Consumption :using adsoprtion chillers which is supplied to the factory
136,426,162
cooling systems. Another activity is the recovery for the heat
kWhr (2010)of the water treatment plant's effluent to serve as a precooling media for air handling unit.

Heat recovery energy reduction measures

Philippines UP Alaya Land
Leasing and (Name of Project) District Cooling System
TechnoHUB
real estate (Outline) The District Cooling System (DCS) is designed to
Number of
maximize the utilization of the chiller plant. The centralized
employees: 5000
system of chiller plant and chilled water source allowed
Annual Electric
flexibility in actual cooling load.
Consumption :The use of this system reduces energy consumption forkWhrchilled water distribution by 33%.
The qualitive advantages of the system are better comfort,
reliability and maximized. Economic benefits are reduced
capital costs, maintenance costs and substantial energy
reduction.

District Cooling System (DCS)
DCS produces chilled water at the central plant anddistributes the energy through underground pipes to
10 buldings connected to the system. The water isreturned to the central plant to be re-chilled and drecirculated through closed-loop piping system.

Thailand

3 causes and measures of excessive energy
consumption

Toyota Motor
Automotive
Thailand Co., Ltd.
(Banpho plant)
Number of
employees: 2779
Annual ElectricConsumption :kWhr(Name of Project) Reduce Natural gas and Electric
consumption in Oven system(Outline) "Oven system" is one of the painting process. It
uses 2.6 million per month, equivalent to 30.16% of energy
consumption of painting process.
The target is to reduce energy consumption by 7% as well as
to support activities to reduce production costs.

1) diesel engine power plant heat recovery
For the diesel engine system, adsorption chillers isused to produce chilled water.

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
EconomyInvestment

cost saving (IDR):
67,308,670

Payback (year): 2
monthsInvestment(IDR):
105,000,000

energy saving (kWHRyear)(1) 4,268,160(2) 1,036,800

payback (year)(1) 3.83(2) 0.04

Investment(US$)(1) 2,000,000(2) 4,500

Possibility to
Disseminate

OthersWinner2) water treatment plant heat recovery
At water treatment plants, energy is used to support
cooling systems for HDD process. TIP installed precooling coils on the air handling units to pre-cool the
return air using the effluent.
annual saving (kWHR/
US$): 6,288,796.8/
1,118,008.31

1st runnerup

Energy efficiency index: AC area: 309.68
kWh/m2/year

1) oven heat loss during the system shut down
- turn on fresh air to let cool air into oven- open exhaust damper to ventilate hot air to outside- collection fan draw out hot air and release outside2) oven uses only a single signal to start all ovens3) temporary stop system using only one reset signal- install hardware which is "analog to digital"- set program to calculate heat up time efficiency

IV-131) gas reduction: 267.76 payback (year)
MMBTU × 317.8 Baht= (1) 3.83
84,458 Baht/month(2) 0.04
electricity reduction:
2,827 kW × 2.3 Baht=
6,502 Baht/month2)& 3) gas reduction:
385.66 MMBTU × 317.8
Baht= 122,562.748
Baht/month
total energy reduction:
213,522.74 Baht/month(equal to 8.19%)

Investment(US$)(1) 2,000,000(2) 4,500

2ndrunner-up

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Submitted Case Studies (2) (Large Buildings Sector 1)
Country
BruneiName of Company
Category(Outline of Company)
Brunei Shell
Petroleum
Petroleum Company
Sdn. Bhd.
Number of
employees: 3300
Annual ElectricConsumption :4,178,755kWh/yPhilippines JP Morgan Chase
Bank, N.A. Philippine Global
Service
Number of
employees: 6800
Annual ElectricConsumption :15,847,771kWh(2010)Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements(Name of Project) Onshore and offshore exploration (1) Upgrade lifts
for, and production of oil and gas with all supporting (2) Reduce number of chillers
facilities(3) Decreasecondenser pumps(Outline) The main energy conservation policies are (4) Decrease canteen AC
as follows:(5) Upgrade desktop monitors
1) Implementation of short and long-term plans(6) Switch-off initiative
2) Capacity building(7) Reduce printers
3) Participation in projects and events related to(8) Hot Desk in KacaLima
energy conservation(9) Projects to disseminate energy conservation
4) Training of staff(Energy Week, Tree planting initiative, Heart of
Borneo project, etc.)
The Energy Conservation Team takes an importantrole in these activities. The team :* represents every faucet of the business* is formed by members from different backgroundto get innovative and fresh ideas* shortens the period of project materialization

Office building (Name of Project) JP Morgan Chase & Co. Goes
Green
(Outline) The target of electricity consumption is
20% reduction across 5-years from 2009. For the
first year, 2.5% reduction (406,353 kWh) was
realized.
The approach to achieve environmental protectionand energy management programs is:1) Set vision, goals and commitments
2) Create and energy management team andmonitoring process
3) Prepare and establish strategic and operatingplans4) Implement sustainble processes and control:
short-term: set up energy team/ utility
benchmarking/ operation rationalization/ replace
conventional lights
medium-term: system audit/ predictive maintenancelong-term: application of new technologies (LED,green power, solar)/ implementation of "time ofuse(TOU)"
5) Capacity building/ broadcast program to increaseawareness of employess

Go Greeen Program
1) "KILL-A-WATT"Program: monitor utilities, turnoff monitors, etc
2) AC operation rationalization: operation per
floor, adjust operation hours with work, deploy
EnerCon staff
3) "SPARTEC"installation at AC motors tominimize "inductive loss": reduction of electricalenergy waste
4) "LED type bulbs" installation
5) Reduction of flourescent light bulbs andinstallation of "mirrorized reflectors"
6) Switch off lights of hallway and pantry
7) SPARTEC installation phase 28) LED installation phase 29) Monitor sensor adjustment
10) Solar power AC11) Energy recovery vetilator

IV-14

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
EconomyInvestment

GWh/y, %4,178,755 kWh/y,(1) 55953-39593, 98 kWh/m2/y29(2) 2928083165249, 94(3) 2743632,
2354688, 14(4) 23741-16758,
29(5) 314346196466, 38(6) 45977, 73(canteen)
2560511, 76(lighting)N.A.

kWh reduction/
Payback periodUS$3) 3 months
1) 685,284/
4) 1 month
116,8105) 2 months2) 1,213,290/
7) 3 months
206,8118) 3.5years
3) 241,920/
10) 2.5years
41,23611) 2.5years4) 221,798/
37,8065) 311,040/
53,0187) 332,028/
73,7858) 136,200/
21,1869) 170,176/
26,47210) 10,483/ 1,630
11) 16,450/ 2,559

Investment(US$)3) 9091
4) 3957
5) 8864
7) 22,890
8) 80,177
10) 4075
11) 5118

Possibility to
Disseminate

Status

1st runner-up

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Submitted Case Studies (2) (Large Buildings Sector 2)
Country

Name of Company
Category(Outline of Company)
Philippines Tower One andOffice andExchange Plaza
trading
Number ofbuilding
employees: 133
Annual ElectricConsumption :15,015,000 kWh/yThailandCentral World
Company Limited
Number of
employees: 365
Annual ElectricConsumption :84,174,452 kWh(2010)

Commercial
building

Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements(Name of Project) Energy Management for Tower
One and Exchange Plaza(Outline) The company promotes leading-edge
technologies through R&D, and implements bestpractices for enegy conservation, as well as training
for employees.
Some of the measures are:1) Predictive maintenance of condition based
maintenance of equipment
2) Regular preventive maintenance3) Insulation tape and aluminum cladding for chilledwater pipes
4) Annual preventive maintenance of electricalsystem5) Manual operating procedural signage6) Annual breaker ampere reading(1) Lighting retrofit at 35th floor(2) Lighting retrofit at stairwell(3) Motor controller soft starter(4) Chiller replacement program(5) Rehabilitation of the heat exchangers(Name of Project) Central World Green World
Project(Outline)
CW is an upscale super shopping complex withgross area of 498,799m2.
It is committed to energy conservation in order toreduce the burden of national supply of energy as
well as emphasis on social responsiibility.
Guidelines for energy conservation are as follows:
1) Energy conservation is part of CW operations
2) CW shall continuously improve the efficiency ofenergy use
3) CW aims to communicate with all employess forgood compliance4) Energy conservation shall be responsibility of
employees at all levels
5) CW shall support energy conservation activities
6) CW shall review and improve policies annually
7) CW shall promote and dissiminate all activities
widely(2008) Install VSD for CHP/CDP pump
(2009) High efficiency chiller(2010)
1) Renovate lighting system
2) Replace fluorescent lamp3) Spray "PU Foam" on the roof

Earlier technological improvements are:1) Building management system (BMS):
computer-based monitoring system for AC andventilation system
2) Variable speed drives (VSD)

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
EconomykWh/y/ US$Payback(1) 38,570/ 6230
period(2) 16,430/ 2650
(1) 5 months(3) 205,720/ 33,170(2) 5 months(4) 1,042,860/ 168,190 (3) 1 year, 9(5) 957,140/ 154,360 months(4) 2 years(5) 1 monthUS$(1) 2430(2) 1040(3) 57,580(4) 338,670(5) 17,280

kWh/ B(2008)
1,852,730/6,484,555(2009)
6,503,612/22,762,624(2010)
1) 14,584/52,502
2) 1,612/5,803
3) 125,218/394,437

unit: B
(2008)
4,450,391(2009)
77,617,169(2010)
1) 50,000
2) 23,626
3) 5,266,800

Short and long-term Plan
(2011)
1) Adjust the flowing rate of chillers under variableprimary flow
target: kWh/y, B/y2) Install VSD at condenser water pump
(2011)
3) Install VSD at air handling unit
1) 811,985/2,557,752
4) Install cleaning device for condenser tube of2) 352,119/1,109,175
chillers3) 107,000/337,050
5) Install PV Solar cell4) 861,352/2,713,260
6) Replace halogen lamp with LED tube
5) 146,000/459,900(2012)
6) 49,144/154,802
1) Install VSD at condenser water pump
(2012)
2) Set-up circuits within the office for proper1) 591,600/1,774,800
operation of work2) 3,480/10,440
From 2008 to 2010, CW reduced energy3) Replace the filling of cooling tower
3) 34,800/104,400
consumption by 9.2%.
(2013)(2013)"Working Parties on Energy Management" functions 1) Install wastewater treatment system in the2) 6,960/20,880
as a leader to materialize energy conservation
cooling tower3) 3,480/10,440
policies as follows:2) Install automatic sensor on computer screen
3) Separate the lighting circuits

IV-15

Investment

unit: year
(2008) 0.7(2009) 3.4(2010)
1) 1
2) 4.13) 13.4
Plan (unit: B)(2011)
1) 3.26
2) 3.253) 5.194) 2.415) 45.74
6) 2.11(2012)
1) 0.673) 0.96(2013)
2) 0.96

Plan (unit: B)(2011)
1) 8,350,000
2) 3,600,000
3) 1,750,000
4) 6,530,000
5) 21,035,000
6) 326,400(2012)
1) 1,190,000
3) 100,000(2013)
2) 20,000

Possibility to
Disseminate

StatusWinnerTable IV-2-1: Analysis of Submitted Case Studies (2) (Large Buildings Sector 3)
Country
Thailand

VietnamName of Company
Category(Outline of Company)
National Electronics Building
and Computer
Technology Center
Number of
employees: 560
Annual ElectricConsumption :8,993,440 kWh/y

Big C Viet Nam
Hypermarket
Number of
employees: 4000
Annual ElectricConsumption :60,747,986 kWh/yName of Project / Activity

Key Improvements

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
Economy(Name of Project) Using Energy Management to (2008)non-investment
kWh/ TB
Green an Organization(1) 2008: 235,722.72/
1) Operate only one elevator 2) Campaign to turn off swithces(Outline) The Center launched the NECTEC Go for lunch time, use stairs, turn off emergency line lighting 3)825,029.52
Green campaign to operate under unified
Adjust point of chiller operation 4) Reduce chiller's operating(2) 2009: 141,525.30/
energy and environmental conservation policies time 5) Clean split-type AC for better performance 6) Split
495,338.55
and practices.
electric control circuits to lighting and passage-way 8) Turn on (3) 2010: 120,969.60/
During the past 3 years (2008-2010), the Center lights on demand
423,393.60
has focused on employess awareness and(2008)investment
energy conservation. Energy consumption is1) Pull switch for lamps 2) Replace fluorescent bulbs for lighting
analyzed every month so that the results can be 3) Filter film for glass windows 4) Cooling pad system for chiller
used for the most effective measures. Any
5) Mini cooling pad system for control rooom
meaure worthy of investment is presented for(2009)non-investment
approval by upper management.
1) Security guards to check unused lights 2) Turn off exhaust
As a result, total power cosumption reduced by fan in water closets 3) Reduce number of light bulbs and6.46%.
chiller's working hours 4) Raise temperature of data center 5)
Split electric control circuit of reception
Part of short and long term plans will continue(2009)investment : installation of:as follows:
1) lamp pull swiches 2) motion sensors in water closet 3) 4
*Organize Energy Saving Champion activity
systems of VSD for AHU 4) water sprinkler system to reduce*Employee camgaign to turn off switches
heat*Install automatic pump control timer(2010)non-investment*Replace a single server room
1) Energy saving champion activity 2) Friday Earth Hour activity
3) Reduce chiller's working hours and number of light bulbs
4) Split electric control circuit of passageway5) Turn on lights on demand(2010)investment
1) Change flourescent light bulbs to LED
2) Heat insulators for glass windows 3) water spray for condensing unit

Trade Center (Name of Project) Use energy efficiently,
increase business efficiency, low price foreveryone(Outline) The company has implemented 3
projects related to energy management. By
these projects, the energy consumption
decreased to 4.5% of the whole system of thecompany's total energy consumption, and theenergy efficiency index in 2010 decreased 22%compared with 2009.
The company organizes many trainings forstaffs, specialized in using energy efficiently.

1) Energy audit hypermarket system (done in 2009)
2) Install energy monitoring & management system
3) Replace fluorescent lighting from T8 to T5 : save 30%
energy consumption for lighting, reduce electricity cost4) Cold storage tank system for central AC system: saveelectricity cost, increase safety for equipment system<Short and long-term Plan>* Green technology: environmental friendly materials for building* Applicable building codes QCXDVN09* Installation of "Power Boss" escalator system* Complete installation of cold storage tank system for central
AC

The company proposes 2 projects to use energy
efficiently:
1) For operation of hypermarkets: study andimprove major energy consuming equipments
2) New construction of hypermarkets: apply
rules, regulations of Vietnam on energy
efficiency in buildings

IV-16

kWh/ US$2) 715,563/ 40,000
3) 6,082,230/ 350,000
4) 141,292/ 88,064

Investment

Possibility to
Disseminate

StatusPayback(2008)investm successful case 2nd runner-up
period (year) ent (TB)
of R&D(2008)invest 1) 38,500.00 3) establishments
14,400.00 4)
ment1) 0.75 3) 0.65 380,000.00 5)4) 3.89 5) 0.72 2,000.00(2009)invest (2009)investm
ent
ment
1) 0.75 2) 0.58 1) 30,800.00 2)3) 3.91 4) 0.10 16,830.00 3)
185,000.00 4)(2010)
4,500.00
Investment
1) 0.78 2) 1.02 (2010)investm
ent3) 1.021) 3,850.00 2)
7,500.00 3)
85,000.00

Payback
period (year)2) 5
3) 1.144) 3.65

Investment cost cold storage tanksystem for(US$)
central AC
2) 20,000
3) 400,000
4) 350,000

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Submitted Case Studies (2) (Small and Medium Buildings Sector 1)
Country
Indonesia

Indonesia

Name of Company
Category
Name of Project / Activity
Key Improvements(Outline of Company)
Building
Commercial (Name of Project) Energy Management based on
A. Non-Investment ProjectManagement PPKP Office
Awarenewess(1) Change the operating hours of HVAC chiiler,
Adhi Graha
Condominium (Outline) The company devevloped Energy Saving AHU, cooling tower, and FCU
Number of
Program (ESP) since 2007 The activites undertaken (2) Turn off lights and water faucets when not in
employees: 45
are:use
Total Electricity* Data collection of electrical equipment building(3) Change the temperature setting when theConsumption in* Determine average energy consumption of 12
weather is HVAC / rain.
2010: 122.08
months(4) Record electricity consumption in thekWh/m2/y* Develop a program based on energy conservation aoutomatic Read Metersawareness(5) Replace conventional ballast with energy* Conduct in-house training for employees
efficient ballasts for general lighting* Record progress of energy saving regularly(6) Conduct trainings for all employees to raise* Regular consultation with government agency
awareness* Create operation room for energy management
PT Kaltim Prima
Coal
Number of
employees: 5175
Annual ElectricConsumption in2009 :
3,650,000kWh/y;

Coal Mining

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
Economy613,120kWh/y(85,497.807Rp/y)(US$10,058.57/y)(Name of Project) Electricity Improvement through A. Short and Long-term Plans:(1) 7000kWh/yEnergy Management(1) Upgrade the lights with new and more efficient (2254US$/y) for lighting(Outline) The focus of energy conservation is totehnology electricity
control
increase employee awareness about energy saving, (2) Replace the window with the air conditioner(2) 438,000kWh/yenergy consumption records, eliminating
split air conditioner(141,000US$/y) for
unnecessary energy use, installing control systems, (3) Monitor the state of power consumption andcentralized air conditioner
making energy efficiency a criterion in procurement / eliminate waste electrical energy(3) 150,000kWh/ydesign of energy utilization equipment, making the (4) Ensure that new equipment fulfills energy(48,300US$/y) for
SOP, and investment for energy saving programs
saving standard, and existing systems support
automatic photocell swtich
enrgy efficiency program(4) 30,000kWh/y
Average electricity consumption decreased from
(5) Pursue objective, target and programs that
(96,600US$/y) to TLD
38,880 kWh/day to 34,033 kWh/day, which isinclude health, safety, and environment KPC
lamp
equivalent to 12.47% saving.
electricity saving program

Investment

Possibility to
Disseminate

StatusNo payback period No investment(1) Payback 19
days(2) Payback 11
days(3) Payback 1049
days(4) Payback 179
days(1) 2400US$ for replicable to officelighting control buildings(2) 3900US$ for
centralized air
conditioner(3) @500US$
for replacementof AC(4) @5US$for
replacement to
TLD lamp

1st RunnerUp

N.A.

N.A.

2nd
Runner-Up

B. Long-term Plans:(1) Re-evaluate the power consumption in the
KPC system after the upgrade of Fixed Plant
which is currently the largest energy user
(2) Re-evaluate the possibility of using LED
lighting(3) Evaluate the use of hot water heater air
conditioner compressors for residential and camp
employees

Malaysia

Malaysian GreenTechnology
Corporation(GreenTech
Malaysia)
Number of
employees: 55
Current building
energy index(BEI) :Average
65kWh/m2/yOffice building (Name of Project) The Energy Management of theGreen Energy Office (GEO Buildnig), GreenTech
Malaysia(Outline) Efforts to reduce BEI started in 2008 andcompleted in March, 2009. The BEI was brought
down from 95kWh/m2/y to 65kWh/m2/y (or net 30
kWh-m2/year inclusive of photovoltaics power
generation).
The target is 30kWh/m2/y.
Besides technical improvement of the building's
system, energy management at the organizationlevel was initiated and plays a vital role.

Programme for a new lower BEI value:
95,250 kWh/y(1) Install 150RT energy efficient cooling tower to RM 37,814/y
improve the heat rejection(2) Install 5HP Fand Coil Units (FCUs) at seminarrooms to improve cooking distribution(3) Install additional bypass chilled water pipe
within the heat exchangers of the Phase Change
Materials(4) Install motorised valves at teh chilled waterand condenser water pipes near the chillers(5) Switch off secondary condenser water pumps(6) Increase the cooling ration of the air
conditioning and floor slab radiant cooling system(7) Revise and monitor the schedule of the chiller,
Air Handling Unit and Radian Cooling Floor Slabs
operations

IV-17

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Submitted Case Studies (2) (Small and Medium Buildings Sector 2)
Country
Philippines

VietnamName of Company
Category(Outline of Company)
MeralcoTraining
Management andCenter with
Leadership
Hotel
Development Center operation
Foundation, Inc.
Number of
employees: 49
Annual ElectricConsumption in2010 : 1,670,710
kW/hour

Hochiminh City Te
levision Building
Number of
employees:
Annual Electricity
consumption

Television
tower

Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
Economy(Name of Project) The MMLDC Way to a
Non-investment
Annual savings (energy: Payback period
Sustainable Energy Management Program(year
A. Education & TrainingkW/h)/(monetary: US$)
(Outline) Through Energy Conservation)C. Infrastructure(1) Conduct of Annual QuESH Fair (2) ESH
A. Education & Training(ENERCON) program, the company has
Caravan for public schools (3) Lakbay(1) 6480/1281 (2) 702/139 (3) 2
constructed a framework to use resources
D. Technology
Karunungan (4) Lakbay Kalikasan(3) 324/64 (4) 864/171
efficiently. It provides partners and stakeholders(1) 0.75 (2) 1.5 (3)B. People & Practices
B. People & Practices
with a template for efficient energy consumption and (1) MMLDC Hour Program (2) Strict Monitoring of (1) 13560/2680 (2)3 (4) 0.5 (5) 0.75
conservation that can be replicated in their own(6) 1 (7) 2 (8) 2.5
ACU & Lighting Usage (3) Color-coding of ligh
253,859/50,181(3)offices.
(9) 15 (10) 5
switches (4) Regular 1 PM & 4 PM swiching-off of 20,620/4076 (4)ENERCON program is an offshoot of practical need key tag switch (5) Cluster guest rooms during low 25,208/4983
to reduce expendidture on utilities and to realize
occupancy (6) Participatino during Earth(5)22,710/4489 (6)advocacy of environmental management.
Hour/Conduct of Earth Day (7) Posting of Energy 1100/217 (7) 5565/1100
By adopting new technology and modifying its
conservation signages (8) Preventive(8) 3529/698 (9) 540/107
infrastructure and policies of resource conservation, Maintenance of lighting & equipment (9) Sharing C. Infrastructure
MMLDC reduced annual electrical utilization per pax of Best practices(1) 11,516/2276 (2)rate by 23% from 2006 to 2010.
C. Infrastructure2196/434 (3) 5096/1007(1) Optimization of Split-type air conditioning (2)(4) 20,216/3996
Use of large windows (3) Use of skylights along
D. Technology
hallways (4) Open air dining(1) 3708/733 (2)D. Technology
34,144/6749 (3)(1) Enclosure of AC temperature controls (2)41,639/8231 (4) 7892/1560
Energy key tag switch (3) LED lighting (4) Nutec (5) 5679/1123 (6) 221/44
Fluorescent lighting ballasts (5) Compact(7) 786/155 (8) 3612/714
Fluorescent lighting (6) Energy-efficient AC(9) 3513/694 (10)refrigerants (7) Laptop computers (8) Solar
6990/1382
shades (9) Solar power (for streets) (10) Electricjeep(Name of Project) Energy management for
Short-term and long-term plans
469,104.5 Wh/y
Television Tower(1) Maintenance of coling towers, FCU, AHU, Air(Outline) The energy policiy of the compnay is:conditioners* Implement The National Target Program of energy (3) Maintenance of water chiller system, coolingefficiency usage
water pump and chilled water pump
* Improve awareness of employees in using energy (4) Check the indicator of cooling and chilled* Search solutions in electricity usage
water, utilize chemical to improve the quality of* Collect efficiency ideas from employees
water* Check and analyze data and reports, and offer(5) Install inverters for chilled water pump and fanenergy management solutionsof cooling tower(6) Training of efficient electricity use for all staff
The company uses software to monitor energy(7) Introduce LED lights
consumption and activitiy status of equipments, etc.. (8) Reward evaluated ideas and departments in
The energy consumption/revenue decreased 40% in energy efficiency usage
2010.
(9) Improve the BMS system and fresh air supply
system(10) Install back-up AC for film studio(11) Replace old monitor of computer(12) Move cooling tower to ground floor(13) Implement solar energy project(14) Contact univirsities to organaze traning
courses

IV-18

Investment

Possibility to
Disseminate

StatusC. Infrastructure (1) QuESH
Winnerprocedures in(US$)
resource(3) 2014
D. Technology conservation:
ENERCON matrix and(1) 551 (2)prodecures for all
10,125 (3)electrical equipment
24,693 (4) 780 (2) Use of solar(5) 842 (6) 44
power for street(7) 310 (8)lighting
1,785 (9)10,410 (10)6,910

Payback period: 10 382,440,000 VN
monthsdong

Table IV-2-2: Applicable Energy Conservation Technologies(From Entry Form for ASEAN Awarding System 2010-2011)
Investment Category
A. Non-Investment(Housekeeping)

Typical Measures

Remarks (Applied by )1) Load air & water chiller centralization
2) Air Leakage and air pressure reduction

CharoenCharoenNational Electro., JP Morgan,
Adri Graha
Adhi Graha
Malaysian Green Tec.
JP Morgan, Brunei Shell, etc.
NOK
Many Applicants3) Operating Condition Adjustment (Chiller operating hours)
4) Record electricity consumption in the automatic read meters
5) Monitor the schedule of chiller
6) Shortening of operation time of Air conditioner
7) Raise chilled water temperature
8) Turning off & Reduction for Lighting, using sunlight9) Regular switching off of key tag switch
10) Setting standard of Room temp.& proper control of fresh air

Field to be applicable
Industry
Building
○
○
○

○
○
○

MMLDC
Many Applicants○National Electro.

1) Improvement of Lighting system (replace to LED lighting)2) Improvement of AC efficiency
3) Install Electric Ballast
4) Water treatment plant discharge use5) Exhaust inverter installation
6) Install soft starter7) Installation of fan coil units (FCUs) & motorized valves8) Upgrade desktop monitors
9) Power saver to minimize inductive loss
10) Installation & improvement of BMS

Many Applicants
Toshiba Info.
Adhi Graha
Toshiba Info.
Toshiba Info.
PT Semen
Malaysian Green Tec.
Hochiminh City, Brunei Shell
JP Morgan
Tower one, Hochiminh City○○

C. Medium Investment 1) Heat Recovery system (for dehumidifier)2) Installation Variable Speed Drivers (VSD)3) - cooler exhaust4) - condenser water pump5) - air handling unit
6) Waste water treatment system
7) Installation of cooling tower
8) Roof Insulation ("PU foam" on roof)(0.05~1.5 Million $) 9) Compressed dry air (CDA) piping modification
10) Use of laptop computers instead of desktop PC
11) Energy monitoring & management system
12) Air recirculation in hazardous area
13) Combined heat & power system (Tri-generation plant)
14) Water spray for condensing unit
15) Cold storage tank system
16) Solar & Wind Energy Usage17) Install partition for separatedd heat zone

Toshiba Info., Glaxo, NOK
Tower one
PT Semen
Central World
Central World
Central World, RMITMalaysian Green Tec.
Central world
TI Phillip
MMLDC
BigC, Goshi
Glaxo
PfizerNational Electro.
BigC
MMLDC, RMIT, JP Morgan
NOK○

D. High Investment( >1.5Million $)RMITToshiba Info.
Central World
National Electro.
Toshiba Info.
Charoen, Goshi
NOK

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)

Building Automatino System (BAS)
Diesel engine power plant heat recovery
High efficiency chiller
Cooling pad system for chiller
Redesign of chilled water system
Insulation for thermal pump & steam tube
Reduce blower speed

IV-19

○
○
○
○
○
○
○

11) Split electric control circuit of passageway
B. Low Investment( <0.05 Million $)

○

○
○

○
○
○
○
○
○
○

○
○
○
○
○
○
○

○
○
○
○
○

○

○
○

○
○
○

○

○
○
○
○
○
○
○

Table IV-2-3: Energy Management Activities(From Entry Form for ASEAN Awarding System 2010-2011)
Activities Category

Typical Activities

Remarks(Applied by )

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)

3R strategy ( Reduce, Reuse, Recycle)
Company policy focusing on efficiency, economy and environment
Improve efficiency of energy use
Sustainable Environmental Protection
Reduce energy intensity/ energy costs/ energy consumption
Elimination and utilization of wasted energy
Introduction of alternative raw materials
Maintain low cost for energy resources
Reduction of CO2 and Greenhouse gas
Environmental protection
Leading-edge techologies through R&D/ Best practice activities
Quality, Environment, Safety & Health (QuESH policy)
5S activities
Innovative green designs/ New green technologies
Kaizen, "Mottainai" program
Introduce modern & energy-saving equipment

Centralworld, PT Semen, TI Phil
MMLDC
Centralworld, TI PhilMMLDC, RMIT, Brunei Shell, JP Morgan
Many Applicants
Toshiba Info.
PT Semen
Many Applicants
Many ApplicantsCentralworld, TI Phil
RMIT, Towerone, Pfizer
MMLDC PT Semen
NECTEC TIPhili
Tower oneTI Phil., Toshiba Info
Hochiminh City, Cetralworld

1)
2)

ENERCON Program
Posting of energy conservation signages
Energy Management Committee & team (company-wide), EMS(energy
management system)
5S activities
Go Green Program (sustainable energy management)
Reward evaluated ideas of EC
Company's Awarding System
CLAM (cost less all materials) team"Green World" concept (participation/ technology/ community)
Human resources development
6) Raise Awareness of employees
7) Information Sharing (ig. best practices)"Communitiy of practices"

MMLDC
MMLDC

C.Standard/Manual 1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

PDCA cycle and keeping standardization
Benchmarking
Change the setting of Room Temp.
CEMS (Continous emission monitoring system)
Develop implementation guidelines

MMLDC
MMLDC, Pfizer, Toshiba Info
Adhi
PT Semen
Adhi

D. Training

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)

Educational Training (Internal& External training)
Send staff to seminars
Energy ambassador
Campaign for Energy conservation / climate change
Brochure, Posters, Stickers
Dissemination of energy-saving knowledge (ig. Factory tour, film

Many Applicants
JP Morgan, BigC
Centralworld
Adhi, PT Katlim, Towerone, Glaxo
PT Katlim, JP Morgan, NECTEC, TI Phil
BigC, Toshiba Info

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

Collect efficiency ideas from employees (ig. Idea box)
Hochiminh City, Centralworld
Company-wide Energy week, Energy Conservation Initiative Competition Brunei Shell
Organize Energy Exhibitions & seminars
NECTECGo Green campaign
NECTEC
Toshiba Info
Technology transfer (ig. Forums, conferences)

Field to be applicable
Industry Building

A. Company Policy

B. Organization

3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)

D. Others

IV-20

○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○

○

○
○
○
○
○

○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○

Many Applicants○○

TI Phil., NECTECJP Morgan
Hochiminh City
JP Morgan
TI Phil.
Centralworld
PT Semen
Many Applicants
MMLDC, TI Phil, Glaxo
NECTEC

○

○
○
○
○

○
○
○
○
○

○

○
○
○
○
○
○

○
○
○

○
○
○
○

○

○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○

IV-2-2. Analysis of Information Provision Methods for Disseminating Best Practices in Energy
Management
Award winner cases are uploaded on the website of the ASEAN Centre for Energy in order todisseminate the information as much as possible.
Additionally, the Best Practices including those submitted by each country are widely utilized as casestudy materials in the Seminar-Workshops and the Energy Management Handbook Training that areheld in each country. This type of method makes it possible to deepen understanding of energy
management through analyzing the case study contents, and although the number of target people eachtime may not always be large, this method prioritizes the key points and is highly effective. In
particular, case study which combines award winner practices with other cases submitted by thecountries that were left out in the final selection is effective.
A new category specifically for collecting and awarding single improvement practices or improvement
projects has been also implemented from fiscal 2010.
IV-2-3. Points to be Improved in the Future, and the Latest Plan
Based on the opinions of the members of the Board of Judges of the 5th Awards that were successfullycompleted in May of the current fiscal year, together with analysis of the applications and Best
Practices in Japan and the current situation reports on the promotion and implementation of theAwards system in each country, discussions were carried out concerning improvements aiming tooperate the Awards system more effectively, including improvement of the evaluation guidelines.
Details of the discussions are as described previously.
The revised key points for submitting applications are indicated on the ASEAN Centre for Energy
website.
The 6th Awards submission, judging, and awarding schedules are tentatively considered as below.
(1) Deadline for Submissions
Each country deadline guideline:
Late April 2012 (Schedule to be determined byeach country)
ASEAN deadline:
Early May 2012 (ACE submission)(2) ASEAN Award-winners Determination
Between late May and early June 2012
(Holding of BOJ-EM)(3) Official Announcement and Awards Ceremony Approx. July 2012 (AMEM - ASEAN Energy
Minister Meeting)(4) Disclosureof Awarded Best Practices
Approx. September 2012

IV-21

IV-3. Building of a System for Utilizing Existing Implementing Organizations (ASEAN Energy
Management Service)
IV-3-1. Progress Situation and Issues in the System Building
Although this system was established in the current fiscal year, in order to develop improvement,
promotions were carried out to increase the registrations of implementing organizations, but thesystem has not reached the stage of actual trial use by customers.
This system is a type of information system that aims to provide access for customers in the various
ASEAN countries who require services such as energy audits or training to directly contact theexisting implementing organizations inside the ASEAN region who are providing such services.
Specifically, this system has the following types of functions.
(1) Information Database of Customers
This stores registered information including the contents, scope, basic specifications and conditions of
the service that the customer actually requires, combined with the customer’s corporate outline.
However, discussion was made regarding whether or not storage of these contents is really necessary,and it was considered that storage was not necessarily required.
(2) Information Database of Existing Implementing Organizations
This stores the registered information, including the contents, basic specifications, scope, andconditions of the services that an existing implementing organization actually provides, together withthe outline of the company or implementing organization.
(3) Registration Search System between Customer and Existing Implementing Organization (ASEAN
Energy Management Service)
This compares information from the customer side and the implementing organization side, andsearches and presents results where the conditions between the customer and the implementing
organizations match or almost match. It also allows access to detailed information of the counterpart.
After gaining the necessary information using this system, customers and implementing organizations
that are mutually interested directly contact each other and start individual negotiations regarding
detailed service provision conditions, and proceed with contract matters. Provision of information andservices for individual negotiations is not handled by this system.
The registration and search system and the display screens described above were prepared offline first,
and then preparation for the next stage of trial operation was completed. Registration is proceeding
following reconfirmation of the local implementing organizations by the Focal Points in each country,
and the registration processes are currently being advanced.
More time was required for the initial registration of the implementing organizations than expected,
causing a delay from the initial plan.
Up till now, 17 organizations from eight countries have been registered, and their details are shown in
Table IV-3-1. Because the yellow-colored areas in the table indicate places where the details of the
supplied technical services are insufficient, information is continuing to be requested. Investigation iscurrently being carried out regarding whether registration of ESCO-related companies should be
carried out as well.

IV-22

Table IV-3-1: ASEAN Energy Management Service Registered Institutions
No
1

Country

Registered Organization

Brunei OGDC(Oil & Gas Discovery Center)
Cambodia
2 Indonesia Narama Mandiri, PT
3
Energy Technology Center
Education & Training Center for Energy & Electricity
4(ETCEE)
5KONEBA/Energy Management Indonesia(EMI)6
Chazaro Gerbang International, PT(CGI)
Lao PDR
7 Malaysia ISI Ventures Sdn.Bhd.
8
Process Systems Engineering Centre (PROSPECT)
9
Malaysia GreenTech (former PTM)
10 Myanmar Myanmar Engineering Society
Department of Energy (DOE) Philippines, Energy
11 Philippines
Efficiency & Conservation Division
12 Singapore G-Energy Global Pte.Ltd.
13 Thailand ATT Consultants Co.,Ltd
14
Cool House Co.,Ltd.
15
Direction Plan Co.,Ltd (DP)16
The Energy Conservation Center of Thailand (ECCT)
17 Vietnam Energy Conservation Center of Hanoi (ECC-Hanoi)

Operation
Business / Services
Gov. Private E.Audit Training Education Consult ESCO Others
○
○
○
○

○
○

○
○

○

○

○
○

○
○

○

○

○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○

○
○

○

○

○

○
○

○
○

○

○
○
○

○
○
○

○
○

○
○

○

○

IV-3-2. Latest Plan
Time was required for discussions and investigations regarding the problem points described above,
and also for the registration work. Even though a call was made for increases in the number of
implementing organization registrations in fiscal year 2011, increases were not obtained. Further, trial
operation has notstarted.
Because customer registration is not necessarily required, we made strong requests to the Focal Points
in each country also at the Post Workshops to further increase the number of implementing
organization registrations in each country, to raise interest among the customers and make it easier forthem to make specific contact. In addition, we requested that trial approaches should be made tocandidate customers.

IV-23

IV-4. Development and Dissemination of Tools for Energy Management
The Energy Management System entered the Step-2 stage in fiscal year 2011. Many tools have beendeveloped, including the Energy Management Handbook, In-house Database, Technical Directory(Industries and Buildings), and other Technical Handbooks, and it is aimed to utilize thesecomprehensively to realize the most effective energy management. The overall plans and issues ofthese tools are shown in the previously described Table IV-1-1. An explanation is given below
regarding each item.
IV-4-1. Dissemination of the Energy Management Handbook
The latest edition of the Energy Management Handbook ASEAN Version (in English) is on the Energy
Conservation Center, Japan and the ACE websites, from where it can be easily downloaded. This fact
is emphasized repeatedly at the Intensive Seminar-Workshops to realize dissemination. For further
dissemination, we advised countries requiring versions in their own language to create their own
language versions. However, due to the problem of budgetary constraints in each country, thissituation meant that promotion was not carried out as much as expected, and specific support wasprovided in Myanmar and Cambodia.
1. Translation to local language and binding of the Handbook
In Vietnam, although the Handbook has already been translated with cooperation of a pioneer
company, apparently Vietnamese government-related persons required time from a budget processing
point of view so that printing and distribution have not been carried out. However, at the Summary
Workshop there was a report that the Handbook had been printed and bound, so we plan to confirm theactual progress.
In the countries that were visited during the current fiscal year, Myanmar made a request for aid intranslating the Handbook to the local language, while Lao PDR made a request for aid in printing andbinding, and assistance was provided for these requests in order to allow use of the Handbook at theseminars. Regarding the translation and binding in Myanmar and Cambodia, requests for assistancewere strongly raised and finally supports for those were decided and accomplished in this year.
2. Preparation Condition in Each Country
Country
Brunei
Darussalam
Cambodia
Indonesia
Lao PDR
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand
Vietnam

Activities for disseminating the Energy Management Handbook
Based on the Handbook, a compact Energy Management Guide has been created fordomestic use, and is being disseminated.
The Handbook has been translated to the local language. Need support also for printing.
Translation to the local language will be finished in next year.
The Handbook has been translated to the local language by a pioneer company, and is being
disseminated as a joint English-Laotian version.
Dissemination of the English version has no problems
Translation to the local language and printing hasbeen finished.
Although the dissemination of the English version has no problems, there are requests fortranslation to the local language.
Dissemination of the English version has no problems
Because parts of this Handbook have been edited from the Thai TEM Handbook, and since
Thailand has its own Energy Management Standards, the English version is used.
Although the Handbook has been translated to the local language by a pioneer company, thesituation regarding the binding and dissemination is unknown. Need more support for
dissemination.

IV-4-2. Dissemination of In-house Database and Technical Directory (Industries and Buildings)

IV-24

1. Dissemination of In-house Database (Industries and Buildings)
At the Intensive Seminar-Workshops held in four countries during the current fiscal year, introductions
to the In-house Database described above were given by ACE.
In both the Buildings and Industries teams, the actual use of the In-House Data Base (IHDB) wasstrongly promoted by carrying out OJT energy conservation audits, and in addition, usage of this tool
was once again strongly recommended to these energy management teams as one of the management
tools.
2. Dissemination of Technical Directory (Industries and Buildings)
The information collected until now has been compiled by ACE under the guidance of ECCJ experts,
and currently 149 cases in the Industries sector and 66 cases in the Buildings sector have been
included.
However, in order to make this more effective function, investigation is currently being carried out
regarding the following improvements in which the Industries and Buildings teams are to work jointlywith ACE to more widely disseminate technologies linked with the ASEAN Award cases in the future.
(1) Basic Policy concerning the TD
The TD should not aim to build a technical data base, but should rather be set as a system thatcompiles and utilizes the technical items obtained from the PROMEEC activities as a directory.
(2) Data Sources
The applications selected in <1> Energy Efficiency Buildings and <2> Energy Management/Best
Practices Building & Industries in the ASEAN Energy Awards should be used as the TD basic data.
(3) System to be Used
The TD should be linked with the Awards website as a system in which the applicable materials of
the Awards website can be opened from the TD to provide users with theapplications.
IV-4-3. Development of Technical Handbooks
While the Energy Management Handbook presents activity guidelines in energy management from thepractical and administrative viewpoints, the creation of additional handbooks providing
comprehensible improvement guidelines concerning technologies will enable the provision of energy
management guidelines for implementing integrated energy conservation promotion activities.
Through a bilateral cooperation between Japan and Thailand, an English version of the Thermal
Energy Efficiency Improvement Handbook has already been completed. In addition, the English
version of the Electrical Energy Efficiency Improvement Handbook was first completed during thecurrent fiscal year, and was uploaded to the ECCJ website. These handbooks were provided atopportunities such as the Intensive Seminar-Workshops in the current fiscal year. Further, theelectronic data of various energy management handbooks and energy conservation audit handbooks
and manuals that are being prepared in each country should be collected, and we are calling on the
Focal Points in each country to provide the electronic data as common reference tools so that theywould be available on ACE website. The related handbook and manual preparation conditions of eachcountry that we confirmed until now is shown in the following figure, and we believe that there aremany other related handbooks and manuals.

IV-25

Brunei
Cambodia
DarussalamEC
Handbooks

EM
Referencefor Building& Industry

Energy Audit
Handbooks

Basic Guide
to Building
Energy Audit

EC Tips(Preparing)

Indonesia

Lao PDR

Malaysia
EE&C
Guidelines
for Thermal& Electricity

EC Tips forHouseholds

Guidelines
on EA for
Buildings &Factories(from Thai)
EC Tips for
Industry,
Building andMyanmarPhilippines Singapore

Thailand

Vietnam

TEEI(Thermal),
EEH(Eletrical)
Guidelines
EA foron EA forIndustry &Buildings &Building
Factories

Household

OthersTEM HB

Training
Textbook forEnergyManagerFig. IV-4-3-1: Energy Conservation Handbooks and Manuals in the Various ASEAN Countries

IV-26

IV-5. Investigation of Building other Information System (e-Directory)
In addition to the use of the tools and information described previously, the provision of information
on ESCO businesses and companies offering energy conservation technologies and equipment will beeffective for companies and related persons in the ASEAN region to promote energy conservation. In
this plan, the following items are to be prepared with the intention of collecting and arranging thenames of subject companies and the names of companies that possess energy conservation equipment
and technologies in each country. Calls for cooperation have been made to the Focal Points at the
Inception Workshops, during local activities, and even at the Summary & Post Workshops.
(1) Directory of ESCO businesses in each country(2) Directory of companies offering energy conservation technologies and equipment in each country
Note that regarding item (2), the JASE-World technology collection including accessable website,which summarizes the representative Japanese energy conservation technology was introduced at eachoccaision in this fiscal year.
In order that related information can be supplied through each country’s Focal Points in the future, aprescribed format was created and sent out by ACE in the current fiscal year with the intention of
preparing a summary during this fiscal year. However, the data has not yet been submitted by eachcountry. Part of the format is shown below, and it is planned to include information about the
supporting supplier outside the right hand column.

Large Category
Medium Category
Small Category
1. Manufacturing
1.1. General Manufacturing
1. Combustion Equipment (1) Air Ratio Improvement
1.1.1. Food Processing
1.1.2. Beverage, Tobacco, Fodder
1.1.3. Textile, Garment
1.1.4. Wood, Furniture(2) Thermal Efficiency Improvement
1.1.5. Printing
1.1.6. Rubber, Leather, Fur
1.1.7. Ceramic, Bricks
1.1.8. Non-Ferrous Metal
1.1.9. Metal Product1.1.10. General Machinery
1.1.11. Electric Machinery
1.1.12. Information Communication
Machinery
1.1.13. Electronic Device
1.1.14. Transportation Machinery
1.1.15. Precision Machinery
1.1.16. Other Manufacturing

Equipment & Device
1) O2 (Oxygen) Analyzer
2) Fuel & Air Ratio Set & Adjustment Device
3) Automatic Combustion Control Equip.
4) High Air Ratio Control Device
1) Preheater for Combustion Air
2) Variable Volume Control Blower for Combustion Air
3) Waste Heat Recovery Type Combustion System
4) Order Combustion Control Device5) Steam Atomize & Gas Atomize
6) Ceramic Radiant Tube Burner7) Oxygen (Rich) Combustion Burner8) Catalytic Combustion Burner9) Flammable Wastage & Flammable Exhast Gas Mixed
Combustion Equip.
10) Submerged Combustion Burner11) High Efficiency Dipping Tube Burner12) Immersion Heater13) Fluidized Bed Combustion Device14) High Efficiency Oxygen Separation Device

Fig. IV-4-3-2: Proposed Format to collect data of Other Information System (e-Directory)

IV-27

V. Results of Discussions at the Summary Workshop
On March 7, 8 and 9, 2012, the Focal Points of the ASEAN countries gathered together tohold the Summary and Post Workshop in Siem Reap, Cambodia in order to share informationand carry out discussions between the 10 counties through confirming and assessing theresults and outcomes of the activities in the three projects and holding talks concerning thefuture plans. At the Summary Workshop, participants carried out discussion of the evaluation
and results in the current fiscal year relating to the energy management project and confirmed
the finalization of the current project within this fiscal year, together with the requirement anddiscussion for new PROMEEC Projectfor fiscal year 2012 and onward. The program of theSummary and Post Workshop is shown in the Attached Materials V-1-1.
V-1. Summary of the Project Implementation Results and Outcomes in FY2011
The activities in the current fiscal year were also developed according to plan. The preparationof various tools and systems on the whole actually made satisfactory progress, and theactivities in the Awards for the Best Practices of energy management was smoothly
implemented. As a result, the previously described Step-1 System of the ASEAN Energy
Management System has been nearly completed and operations were started.
Based on the above, part of the Step-2 System has been also started, and the activities fromfiscal year 2011 could be smoothly started.
The following indicates the results and outcomes of the projects in the current fiscal year.
1. As well as disseminating the various programs and tools of the ASEAN Energy
Management System through implementing Intensive Seminar-Workshops (ISW), Energy
Management Handbook Training, and visits to factories and buildings in four of the ASEAN
countries, the network of cooperating companies and organizations was expanded. In theactivities in Myanmar that continued from the previous year, the English version of the EM
Handbook was distributed to all the participants, while in Lao PDR the Laotian version wasprovided to everyone taking part. During the Group Work in the Training in countries
including Malaysia, we could confirm that the foundations for independent activities arefavorably taking shape as for the points that the local Focal Points and other instructors gave
advice and guidance. In addition, in Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar, strong requests werealso made for support in translating the Handbook to the local language and partly for thebinding, so afterwards support for translating the Handbook to the local language was started
and finished in Cambodia and Myanmar.
2. Concerning the ASEAN Energy Management System, the Step-1 System consisting of thebasic functions and related programs and tools has nearly been completed.
Ⅴ-11) The Award system for the collection and dissemination of the Best Practice cases in energy
management was smoothly implemented, and proposals for further improvements were
presented based on the results of discussions held among the Board of Judges.
2) Trial use of the ASEAN Energy Management Service that is used for existing implementing
organization and customer searching is currently under preparation. Seventeen registrations
were completed in the existing implementing organization registration, and the system wasawaiting registration of customers. In consideration of the current situation where the trial use
was not proceeding as expected, it was decided to further increase the registrations of
implementing organizations in each country, while putting off the registration of customers
which is not always required. In addition, we encouraged interested parties in each country to
carry out trial use.
3) Regarding the investigation and preparation of measures for the STEP-2 System functions
and programs, it was determined to proceed after certain progress of the Step-1 Systemdescribed above, and the priority was lowered for the time being.
3. The Network of Cooperators was expanded through implementing local activities. 1,260
persons have participated in the Intensive Seminar-Workshops since fiscal year 2006 while
658 people have attended the Training Sessions since fiscal year 2007. In addition, teams ofexperts have visited a total of 121 companies and organizations since fiscal year 2004 in aplan to expand the network through giving guidance including popularizing the activity
results.
4. Report and proposal from ECCJ (on Energy Management Issue)
Report was presented by ECCJ, focussed on the local activity result and status of ASEAN
Energy Management System Development. Translation of Energy Management Handbook
into own language was done both in Myanmar and Cambodia in this fiscal year. Although allplanned system and tools have not completed yet, through eight years PROMEEC EM activity
result, basic energy management infrastructure has been established, current energy
management project is declared to be finalized in this fiscal year, however, strong
requirements are confirmed from every focal point for evaluating useful and continuous
support on energy management tools. As the establishment and operation of energy
management system and tools are very important core project in a capacity building, linking
with ESCO, private sectors and Energy Efficiency & Conservation Equipment information, it
should be more focussed to develop and establish for ASEAN Energy Management Service,
and e-Directory (ESCO) and e-Directory (EE&C Technology and Equipment Suppliers) for
more development of Business Matching.

Ⅴ-2

添付資料Ⅴ−１−１：Summary & PostWorkshop の Agenda

FINAL AGENDA
SUMMARY AND POST WORKSHOPPROMOTION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION (PROMEEC)(MAJOR INDUSTRY, BUILDING AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT)
SOME-METI WORK PROGRAMME 2011-2012
7-9 March 2012, Siem Reap, Cambodia
Day 1: 7 March 2012

Remarks
08:00
08:30
08:30
08:35

-

08:30
09:15
08:35
08:40

10:15

REGISTRATION
Opening Session- Statement from the Host Country- Opening Statement from EE&C-SSN
Coordinator- Opening Statement from ACE- Opening Speech by ECCJ
Election of Co-Chairs & Rapporteur,
Adoption of the Agenda & Photo Session
SUMMARY WORKSHOPPROMEEC – ENERGY MANAGEMENT
1. Evaluation of Local Activities by Focal
Points- Expectation and Actual Results andAchievements- Points to be Improved and Achievements to
be Shared with Other Countries
Presentation by Lao PDR

08:40
08:45
08:50

-

08:45
08:50
09:15

10:15

10-45

Presentation by Malaysia

10:45

11:15

Presentation by Myanmar

11:45

Presentation by Thailand

12:00

2. Status and Evaluation of Progress inAward System for E.M. / Preparation of
ASEAN E.M. System (Step-2) / ASEAN
Energy Management Service for
Implementing
Organizations – Customer by ACE
Lunch
3. Summary and Evaluation of Activities(ECCJ)- Results : Main Activities in 4 Countries- Evaluation of Achievements and Results of

09:45

09:45

11:15

SESSION 1
11:45

-

-

11:45

12:00
13:30

-

13:30
14:00

Ⅴ-3

Outcomes &Recommendations of
PROMEEC Activities: 1.
Seminar-Workshop; 2.
Training on EMHB; 3. EMHBIntroduction
Outcomes &Recommendations of
PROMEEC Activities: 1.
Seminar-Workshop; 2.
Training on EMHB; 3. EMHBIntroduction
Outcomes &Recommendations of
PROMEEC Activities: 1.
Seminar-Workshop; 2.
Training on EMHB; 3. EMHBIntroduction
AEA Presentation
AEMS development

Local Activities- Evaluation of Progress in Preparation of
Programs and Systems to Establish“ASEAN Energy Management System”- Overall Evaluation and Required
Improvements toward Phase -3

15:00

-

15:30

PROMEEC – Major Industry
1. Evaluation of Local Activities by Focal
Points- Expectation and Actual Results andAchievements- Points to be Improved and Achievements to
be Shared with Other Countries
Presentation by Indonesia

14:40

-

15:00

Presentation by Philippines

15:00

-

15:35

15:30
15:45

-

15:40
16:30

16:30

-

17:00

2. Status and Evaluation of Progress in
Preparation of Technical Directory andDissemination of In-house Database by
ACE
Coffee Break
3. Summary and Evaluation of
Activities (ECCJ)- Results : Main Activities in Indonesia /Philippines- Evaluation of Achievements and Results ofLocal OJT Activities- Evaluation of Progress in Improving
Technical Directory and Developing
In-house Database including
Dissemination- Overall Evaluation and Required
Improvements toward Phase-3
Q & A and Overall Discussion
End of Session for Day 1
Reception Dinner

14:00

SESSION 2- 15:00

18:30

Day 2: 8 March 2012SESSION 3
09:00- 10:20

09:00

-

09:30

PROMEEC – Building
1. Evaluation of Local Activities by Focal
Points- Expectation and Actual Results andAchievements- Points to be Improved and Achievements to
be Shared with Other Countries
Presentation by Brunei Darussalam

09:30

-

10:00

Presentation by Cambodia

Ⅴ-4

Outcomes &Recommendations of
PROMEEC Activities: 1.
Energy Audit;
2. OJT; 3.
Seminar-Workshop
Outcomes &Recommendations of
PROMEEC Activities: 1.
Energy Audit;
2. OJT; 3.
Seminar-Workshop

TD Industry development
IHD Industry development

Outcomes &Recommendations of
PROMEEC Activities: 1.
Energy Audit;
2. OJT; 3.
Seminar-Workshop
Outcomes &Recommendations of10:00-

10:30

Presentation by Vietnam

10:30

-

11:00

11:00

-

11:30

11:30
12:00

-

12:00
13:30

2. Status and Evaluation of Progress inAward System for E.M. / Preparation of
ASEAN E.M. System (Step-2) / ASEAN
Energy Management Service for
Implementing Organizations – Customer
by ACE
3. Summary and Evaluation of Activities(ECCJ)- Results : Main Activities in Brunei /Cambodia / Vietnam- Evaluation of Achievements / Results ofLocal OJT Activities- Evaluation of Progress in Improving
Technical Directory and In-house
Database including Dissemination- Overall Evaluation and Required
Improvements toward Phase-3
Q&A and Overall Discussion
Lunch

13:30

SESSION 4- 15:00

15:00
15:15

-

15:15
16:30

16:30

-

17:00

PROMEEC Activities: 1.
Energy Audit;
2. OJT; 3.
Seminar-Workshop
Outcomes &Recommendations of
PROMEEC Activities: 1.
Energy Audit;
2. OJT; 3.
Seminar-Workshop

POST-WORKSHOP
Discussion on PROMEEC Enhancement and Improvement
1.Presentation by all ASEAN Focal Points- Improvements to be made in the design and implementation strategies andactivities of 3 PROMEEC sub-projects
a. How to make the sub-projects more meaningful and relevant to the needs
and priorities your Country?
b. How do the scope and implementation arrangements could encourage
greater interaction and sharing of expertise by the ASEAN Member
States?
c. How could the private sector and other relevant sectors be encouraged toparticipate in the PROMEEC activities?
d. What should be done to further promote and disseminate PROMEEC tools
and results of activities?
e. What should be done to ensure effective promotion and dissemination ofaudit results?
f. How to sustain the skills / knowledge acquired by trainees on conducting
energy auditing? Are their skills enough? Can they prepare independent
audit reports? How to link energy audits in overall EE&C programmes?
Can we synergize it with other programmes? What should be theend-results?
- New Activities
a. Country needsb. Implementation strategies
c. Deliverables / Output
Coffee Break
Request for New PROMEEC Projects and Activities by all ASEAN Focal
PointsRequest for New PROMEEC Projects and Activities by ACE
End of Session for Day 2

Ⅴ-5

Day 3: 9 March 2012SESSION 4
9:00
10:15
10:15
- 10:30
10:30- 11:30
11:30- 12:00
12:00- 12:30

12:30

-

14:00

14:00

-

17:00

POST-WORKSHOP
Discussion of New PROMEEC Projects and Activities by ECCJ
Coffee BreakDiscussion of New PROMEEC Projects and Activities by all Participants
Summary of New PROMEEC Project Plan by ACE & ECCJ
Closing Statements by
1. Chairperson of EE&C-SSN
2. ECCJ
3. ACELunch
End of Session 4 for Day 3
Summary of Meeting of New PROMEEC Project Plan between ACE & ECCJ
End of Meeting

Ⅴ-6

V-2. Latest Plan of the ASEAN Energy Management System based on the Implementation Results
With the exception of the ASEAN Energy Management Service, the Step-1 System has almost been
completed according to plan and operation has begun. Based also on this issue, investigation has been carriedout for additional functions required for the Step-2 System and the programs and tools to be included in the
Step-1/Step-2 Systems.
Incorporating this point, the plan for the Step-2 System was newly developed, including the continuous
improvement of the Step-1 System.
Specifically, to make the ASEAN Energy Management System a stable and sustainable system, it will benecessary to establish an infrastructure that systematically implements maintenance and expansion of thesystem.
This plan is described in Fig. V-2-1.

SystemLevel

STEP - 1

Main Activities

2012

2013

2014

2015

Completion of "ASEAN Energy
Management Service"
Verification & Improvement in
Programs & Tools
Development of Additional
Functions / Programs / Tools

Completion

STEP - 2 Working & Tuning Prepared New
Functions / Programs / Tools
Verification & Improvement in
Programs & Tools
Entire Operation of ASEAN Energy
System Management System
Fig. V-2-1: ASEAN Energy Management System Establishment Program
At the same time, it will also be necessary to properly establish and operate a network of relatedorganizations, corporations and people in the ASEAN region who are the users and the cooperators of thissystem.
In addition, because the PROMEEC Project has currently entered Phase-3, it is important that the ASEAN
Energy Management System should continue to function and be used as an effective tool for building afoundation for secure implementation and dissemination based on further voluntary efforts in the ASEAN
region.
In recognition of the course of action described above, it is planned to firmly implement the following
activities. Among the three items described below, items 1 and 2 relate to the improvement of the Step-1
System, while item 3 concerns the development and preparation of the Step-2 System.
1. Improvement of Functions and Programs Currently being Operated(1) System for collecting and disseminating Best Practices in Energy Management
Improvements should be planned from a viewpoint of operations of the ASEAN Award System of Best
Practices in Energy Management for Industries and Building, whose policies were determined at a
Research Forum held in Japan. This will make it possible to collect energy conservation promotion
cases that achieve better and more useful energy management improvements, while at the same timedeveloping an environment that allows all 10 countries to actively submit applications to the awards.
1) Follow-up the review of the Awards categories- Awards classified into large-scale or small and medium-scale depending on the amount of the energy
consumption of factory and building
V-7

- Awards for single improvement cases (to be added to the existing factory and building awards)
2) Review of the classification standard values and definitions for the items described above.
2. Completion of Functions and Programs under Development and Start of Operations(1) Establishment and dissemination of energy management basic tools
Continue activities including giving instruction in usage methods using simple one-day Training todisseminate the completed Energy Management Handbook together with the In-house Database andTechnical Directory as the “basic tools of energy management”.
(2) Speed up the increase in implementing organization registration numbers and trial operation of“customer and implementing organization registration search system” (ASEAN Energy Management
Service), which has the purpose of utilizing existing implementing organizations for carrying out energy
audits and training.
3. Functions and Programs that are Planned to be Newly Developed and Constructed(1) Preparation and introduction of new tools
In addition to the energy management basic tools described above, supplementary handbooks ontechnical aspects will be prepared.
Specifically, the English versions of the Thermal Energy Efficiency Improvement (TEEI) Handbook andElectrical Energy Efficiency Improvement (EEH) Handbook, which were prepared in a cooperation
based on the Green Partnership Program (GPP) policy dialogue between Thailand and Japan have been
completed for use in the ASEAN nations, and both have been uploaded to the ECCJ website where they
can be downloaded by anyone.
In addition to these handbooks, we are currently requesting the supply of information from each
ASEAN country to collect energy audit manuals and energy conservation handbooks possessed by eachcountry. If required, these can be translated into English and posted on the ACE website to allow
utilization by each ASEAN country.
(2) Preparation of an information system (e-Directory) relating to energy conservation businesses
To provide access to companies offering energy conservation technologies and equipment, develop a
directory to introduce ESCOs (Energy Service Companies), enterprises providing energy conservation
technologies and equipment, and contact persons. A basic investigation will be carried out fordeveloping this directory for application as an “e-Directory” using the website of the ASEAN Centre forEnergy (ACE). For this, detailed introductions were given in the current fiscal year, including thewebsite that allows access to the JASE-World technical directory which collects Japanese energy
conservation technologies. Other than this, since it is likely that similar information will be available ineach ASEAN country, investigation was started to integrate them.
(3) Improvement of the ASEAN Energy Management System to facilitate use(3)-1 Establishment of “One Stop to System” functions
Although there is an aim to improve the accessibility to the information required by users, more timeand budget are required for carrying out the investigations, and this will be started when the items (1)and (2) described above have progressed further.
(3)-2 Establishment of an Advisory Service function
For cases when “One Stop to System” cannot provide advice, or when more specialized advice isrequired, it is planned to set a function in which technical experts voluntarily register themselves andappropriate experts give advice to users. However, there were many issues including the registration ofexperts from the ASEAN region so it was decided that this item will also be started when the items (1)and (2) described above have progressed further.
V-3. Discussion on the Direction for New Project after 2012-2013
New PROMEEC Project Idea was discussed and summarized as follows.
[Overall Scheme](1) Human Resources Development and Information Sharing: OJT Energy Audit, Seminar-Workshop(2) Promotion of EC Technology and Business Matching: Seminar-Workshop, Exhibition, Business Talk
(3) Development and Dissemination of Energy Management System and Tools:
ASEAN Energy Award
In-house Database
Technical Directory
ASEAN Enerfy Management Service
e-Directory of EC Technology and Equipment Suppliers
V-8

Energy Management Handbook
Energy Audit Manual
ASEAN Expert Databank
Pamphlet of PROMEEC Project Activity Reports
Webite for PROMEECOthers(4) MTPEC (Multi-lateral Countries Training Course of Promotion of Energy Conservation): Level up of
project contents, enrichment, development of tools to enlarge scope; smart-community, smart grid, lowcarbon society, ESCO,etc.
Details of above (1) through (4) are shown as follows.
(1) Human Resources Development and Information Sharing: Human Resource Development is to beaccomplished through OJT of Energy Audit
The purpose is not only capacity building of Energy Conservation for government officers and energy
management staffs in objective factories and buildings, but also for establishment of infrastructure on ESCO
project promotion. It is also expected to have the development of ESCO project and dissemination of highefficient Energy Conservation Equipment.
OJT will be done for core group with 10-12 members. This core group is also composed of one to
two ASEAN engineers from EC advanced ASEAN countries, and approved by AMSs (ASEAN
Member States), ACE and ECCJ. ACE will contract with this group, and support cost. Japaneseexperts will join in this OJT as advisers.
Participants for core group are to be given certificates as authorized energy auditor signed with
AMSs, ACE and ECCJ.
Core group (OJT participants) makes Reports, and Workshop is held with ESCO proposal based
upon the report result. Investors, ESCO and EC Equipment Suppliers with private sector companies
are requested to participate in this workshop.
Each country should select the objective factories and buildings for energy audit with high potentialof energy conservation and realizing ESCO project.
Three days lecture and three days practical energy audit, then issue the certificate of energy auditors.
(2) Promotion of EC Technology and Business Matching: Seminar-Workshop for Promotion of EC
Technology and Business Matching is to be held
Seminar including introducing ASEAN Energy Award is held together with the event of EC
Exhibition and Conference, etc. in ASEAN to disseminate energy management system and tools,
and to introduce Japanese State of the Art EC Technologies. Exhibition with Sales Talk with
co-operation of JASE-World is also planned in future.
Introduction of Successful Cases in Demonstration Project in ASEAN by Japanese Cooperation
through NEDO, JICA, etc. is also planned.
Workshop of ASEAN-Japan Best Practices on EC Equipment Standard and Labeling is also to beheld for the purpose of EC Information Sharing in ASEAN.
(3) Development and Dissemination of Energy Management System and Tools: Existing EM System andtools which have been developed in PROMEEC Project should be improved and disseminated, and thosesystem and tools are to be disseminated through OJT Energy Audit and Seminar-Workshop.
Dissemination of necessary tools to promote ESCO project in ASEAN such as EM Handbook, EA
Manuals, etc.
More promotion of participation of Japanese companies to the Information Supply Toola such as
Techinical Directory, e-Directory, ASEAN EM Service, is planned, and Japanese State of the Art EC
Technologies information shall be sent from the platform of this project.
Task Force Team is requested to conduct this in ASEAN countries.
(4) MTPEC (Multi-lateral Countries Training Course of Promotion of Energy Conservation): Training inJapan; Although existing MTPEC Training Course in Japan is considered as a continuous program for policy
training, this opportunity should be also utilized as for tools to the level up and achieve the purpose of thisproject content, therefore, it should also contain some elements which have been conducted in the Research
Forum in EM Project. Participants should be limited to relevant to this project, and requested to have theapproval of AMSs, ACE and ECCJ.

V-9

Persons or organizations wishing to publish the contents ofthis report should obtain the permission of the TechnicalCooperation Department, International Cooperation Divisionof the Energy Conservation Center, Japan beforehand.
Tel.: +81-3-5543-3018
Fax: +81-3-5543-3022