Journal of Global Resources
Volume 6 (01)August 2019-January 2020
Page 179-182
UGC–CARE Listed Journal in Group D
ISSN: 2395-3160 (Print), 2455-2445 (Online)

28
ANALITICAL STUDY OF STREAM FREQUENCY AND DRAINAGE DENSITY OF UPPER
NARMADA BASIN: A REMOTE SENSING AND GIS APPROACH
Vinay Raikwar1 and Pramod Pagare2
Research Scholar1, Professor2
Department of Geography, Govt. M.G.M. P.G. College, Itarsi, Hoshangabad (MP) India
Email: vinay.utd@gmail.com
Abstract: The present paper deals with analysis of stream frequency and drainage density ofupper Narmada Basin in Central India. Hortan's method is used to get desired result. Stream
frequency and Drainage density are two important factors that control the speed of run off inheavy rain. The faster runoff determines the grater density and frequency of streams. It isobserved that Upper Narmada basin has lowest drainage density indicating higher rate of
infiltration greater subsurface flow, high moisture retentive capacity and relatively low relief, andhighest drainage density indicating lower rate of infiltration and more runoff than other area,
because basin having part of rocky barren land which has less permeability that’s why in thisarea groundwater table is not well developed. The highest drainage frequencies are reported
from the central, northern and eastern part of the basin, which area indicating high permeable
geology and low relief. While the lowest drainage frequencies are observed over the peripheral
part of the basin, which is having impermeable subsurface and sparse vegetation and highrelief conditions.
Key words: Drainage Density, Stream frequency, Spatial Analysis, Upper Narmada Basin
Introduction
A drainage basin is defined as an area drained by river and its tributaries. A basin is a naturalhydrological feature in which various channel, drains and streams are seen is as surface runoff.
The analysis of stream frequency and drainage density is used to manage various aspects
such as drinking water supply, observing runoff, erosion, irrigation, pollution etc. Remotesensing and GIS techniques are important tools in the determination of morphometric analysisof the drainage basin. It plays significant role in providing spatial data required for calculationsof morphometric indices like steam frequency and drainage density etc. The total length of
streams of all orders per drainage area is called Drainage density. Drainage density factor has
been related to climate, rocks types, relief, infiltration capacity, the cover of vegetation andsurface roughness (Horton, 1932). According to Horton (1932), Drainage Density is defined
ratio of the total length of all stream segments in a given drainage basin to the total area of thatbasin. According to Horton (1932), stream frequency is the total number of stream segments ofall orders per unit area. Stream frequency is the measure of the number of streams per unit
area (Horton, 1945). A higher stream frequency indicates the higher surface runoff and steep
ground surface. Stream frequency or drainage frequency is the measure of the number ofstreams per kilometer area. According to Rogers (1971), high drainage density is represented
by metamorphic rocks, whereas a sedimentary rock shows low drainage values.
Study Area
The area under “Upper Narmada Basin " comprises of a fairly large tract lying between 21041'North to 23046' North latitude and from 79017' East to 81046' East longitude. The area comesunder the tropical belt and location of the area is itself significant. The Narmada River rises inthe Amarkantak plateau of Maikal Range in the 'Anuppur' District of Madhya Pradesh at anelevation of 1057 meters above sea level. The river travels a distance of 1312 kms, before it
falls in to Gulf of Cambay in the Arabian Sea near Bharuch in Gujarat. The Narmada Basinhemmed between Vindhyachal and Satpura ranges extend over and area of 98,796 kms2. Thebasin covers and large area of Madhya Pradesh (86 percent), Gujarat (14 percent) andcomparatively smaller area (2 percent) in Maharashtra. About 35 percent of the basin area inunder forest cover, 60 percent under arable land and 5 percent is grassland, wasteland etc.
179

The climate is humid tropical. Average Rainfall of Basin is 1178 mm. whereas averagetemperature ranges is 25.80 C.
Figure 01: Location Map of upper Narmada Basin

Objectives
 Mapping and Analysis of drainage density.
 Mapping and Analysis of Stream frequency.
 Study of correction between stream frequency and drainage density.
Data Source and Methodology
To get drainage density and stream frequency, drainage map is prepared by scanning ofsurvey of India topographic sheets on 1:50,000 scale by Global Mapper 10.2 GIS software.
After geo referencing top sheets are compiled in single mosaic. Stream order is calculatedusing Strahler (1953) system in Arc GIS 10.6 software. While the stream length, total basinarea, perimeter were measured with the help of Arc GIS 10.6 software. The entire catchment
and mainstream has been prepared from the DEM prepared by Top sheet contour and ILWIS
3.7.Hortan Method (1932) Used to get desired results. Hortan suggested stream frequency isthe dividend of numbers of streams (NU) with the area of drainage basin (A).
Stream frequency (DF) = NU/A
Whereas drainage density is the total number of stream Lengths in the basin (LU) divided by
the area of basin (A).
Drainage density (DD) = LU/A.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Drainage Density (DD)The special analysis showed the drainage density is range from 0 to 6 km per sq km (Table4.1) and the very low drainage density (0 to 1) value is attributed due to the presence of
permeable subsurface formation, dense vegetation and low relief (Langbein, 1947; Nag, 1998).
Drainage density characterizes the textural measure independent of basin size and considered
to be a function of climate, lithology, stage of development, etc. it is a measure of drainage
dissection that reflects the competing effectiveness of overland flow and infiltration. Horton(1945) reasoned that basins of low drainage density are the product of runoff processes
dominated by infiltration and subsurface flow, whereas basins of high drainage density are theproduct of erosion and dissection by overland flow. Higher drainage density also indicates thedecrease in the length of overland flow with increase in angle of hill slope (Schumm, 1956). It isobserved that Upper Narmada basin has lowest drainage density (0 to 1 km/ sq km) covers
164.59 sq. km (0.71 percent) area of the basin, indicating higher rate of infiltration greatersubsurface flow, high moisture retentive capacity and relatively low relief, and highest drainage
density (4 - 6 km/sq km) covers 4436.37 sq. km (19.21 percent) area of the basin, indicating
lower rate of infiltration and more runoff than other area, because basin having part of rocky180barren land which has less permeability that’s why in this area groundwater table is not welldeveloped. Table 01 shows the spatial analysis of drainage density of the Upper Narmada
basin. All these facts of the spatial analysis of Drainage density clearly indicate theasymmetrical distribution of Drainage density of the basin.
Table 01: Spatial Analysis of Drainage Density
2Drainage Density(km./km )
0--1
1--2
2--3
3--4
4--6

Area (sq.km.)
164.591085.92
2298.59
15103.53
4436.3723089.00

Area (%)
0.71
4.70
9.96
65.41
19.21
100.00Figure 02: Upper Narmada Basin Drainage Density

Stream Frequency
For the computation of stream frequency, the Upper Narmada basin is conveniently divided into
the grid of one square kilometer; then the number of streams are counted in each grid of onesquare kilometer and tabulated for quantification. The data of stream frequencies are classifiedas a fixed Class interval as 4 streams per square kilometer area. The highest drainage
frequencies (16 to 20 Streams per sq. km) are reported from the central, northern and easternpart of the basin, which area indicating high permeable geology and low relief. While the lowest
drainage frequencies (0 to 4 Streams per sq. km) are observed over the peripheral part of thebasin, which is having impermeable subsurface and sparse vegetation and high relief
conditions. Table 02 shows the spatial analysis of stream frequency of the Upper Narmada
basin. All these facts of the spatial analysis of stream frequency clearly indicate theasymmetrical distribution of stream frequency of the basin.
Table 02: Spatial analysis of Stream Frequency
2Stream Frequency (Streams/km )
0--4
4--8
8--12
12--1616--20Area (sq.km.)
182.56
951.607980.74
12303.13
1670.9723089.00

181

Area (%)
0.79
4.12
34.57
53.29
7.24
100.00Figure 03: Upper Narmada Basin Stream Frequency

Conclusion
It is observed that Upper Narmada basin has lowest drainage density (0 to 1 km/ sq km) covers
164.59 sq. km (0.71 percent) area of the basin, indicating higher rate of infiltration greatersubsurface flow, high moisture retentive capacity and relatively low relief, and highest drainage
density (4 - 6 km/sq km) covers 4436.37 sq. km (19.21 percent) area of the basin, indicating
lower rate of infiltration and more runoff than other area, because basin having part of rocky
barren land which has less permeability that’s why in this area groundwater table is not welldeveloped. The highest drainage frequencies (16 to 20 Streams per sq. km) are reported fromthe central, northern and eastern part of the basin, which area indicating high permeable
geology and low relief. While the lowest drainage frequencies (0 to 4 Streams per sq. km) are
observed over the peripheral part of the basin, which is having impermeable subsurface andsparse vegetation and high relief conditions. High Correlation is found between stream
frequency and drainage density. The High range of drainage frequency and density indicatesthe mature stage of basin.
Reference
1. Singh, Savindra (1999) Geomorphology, Prayag Pustak Bhavan, Allahabad.
2. Strahler, A.N., (1946) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks,
in: V.T. Chow (ed). Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw Hill Book Company, NewYork, Section, 4-11.
3. Kumar Vipin (2017) Study of Drainage Frequency and Drainage Density of somb drainage
Basin in lower Shiwalik Hills, India, International Journal of Arts, Humanities andManagement Studies Vol. 03 pp-83-92
4. Nag, S.K. (1998) "Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chaka
sub-basin, Purulia District, West Bengal, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing,Vol. 26, No. 1 & 2, pp 69-76.
5. Rogers, W.J. (1971) Hydrograph analysis and Some Related Variables in QuantitativeGeomorphology- Some Aspect and Applications M. Morisowa, Ed. Binghamto, New Yark,
State University of New Yark.
6. Horton, R.E, (1945) Erosional development of stream and their drainage basin:
Hydrological approach to quantitative morphology, Bull Geol. Soc, Amer., V. 56, pp 275.
7. Langbein,W.B., (1947) Topographic characteristics of drainage basin: U.S. Geol. Survey
Water-supply Paper 968- C, p. 125-157.
8. Schumn, S.A. (1956) Evolution of Drainage System and Slope in Badlands at Parth Amboy,
New Jersey. Bulletin Geological Society of America, Vol. 67, pp 597-646.

182