Journal of Global Resources
Volume 6 (01)August 2019-January 2020
Page 207-213
UGC–CARE Listed Journal in Group DISSN: 2395-3160 (Print), 2455-2445 (Online)

33
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES TO DEMARCATEGROUNDWATER POTENTIAL ZONES IN SRIPERUMBUDUR, CHENNAI
Shyam Sundhar.V1, S. Sanjeevi Prasad2 and Indrani Mukherjee3
1Research Scholar, 2Assistant Professor, 3M.Sc. Student,
Department of Geography, University of Madras, Chennai, India
Abstract: The study focuses comparison of hyperspectral and multispectral imagery foridentifying the groundwater potential zones and aquifers of Sriperumbudur region. It also tries
to identify which image tends to be better for groundwater analysis without ground truth
verification. In present going to field and then selecting spot for digging the groundwater istiring and time taking. The need of conservation and its resource assumes more importancethan ever before. Water scarcity has always remained a problem in the city of Chennai. For
conserving of water, the study attempts to mark the potential zone which is exposed forgetting polluted and contributing to health risk. The various thematic maps have been
prepared such as landuse pattern, soil type, geology, geomorphology and lineament wereused for identifying the potential zone. Weightage and ranking were given to each parameter
before overlaying all the parameters. Therefore, the study is to sort the problem of ground truth
verification for identifying area, and identify the zone through remote sensing and Geographical
Information System (GIS).
Key words: Groundwater Potential, Hyperion, Geographical Information SystemIntroduction
Groundwater resource is considered to be the most important freshwater resource. With
increasing population in the metropolitan is not only threat to the reserve but also its quality.
The fast growing population needs a continuous supply for freshwater. For protecting thesezones, we need to find the zones and demarcate them. Hence taking Chennai as our study
area which is also a metropolitan city of India as well as it faces acute water scarcity
throughout the year. The groundwater potential zones are first identified and analyzed to findout the status or condition of the zones in relation with the quality and what will be healthrisks. To identify the groundwater potential zones, techniques of GIS and remote sensing
has been used. Thematic maps like geology, soil, and lineament has been prepared toenhance the exploration of potential groundwater zones. Groundwater is presently found to
be most important freshwater source. As the rising population needs supply of water
therefore it has become mandatory to discover the potential zone of groundwater. A
standard technology applied to predict groundwater potential zone using remote sensing andGIS techniques using various tools. Many thematic maps were created such as slope map,
lineament maps etc. The most significant recent breakthrough in remote sensing has been
the development of hyperspectral sensors and software to analyses the resulting image data.
Fifteen years ago only spectral remote sensing experts had access to hyperspectral
images or software tools to take advantage of such images. Over the past decade
hyperspectral image analysis has matured into one of the most powerful and fastest growing
technologies in the field of remote sensing.
Methodology
With satellite imagery of IRS-P6-LISS-IV (2013) lineament map was prepared, with same
parameters layer stacking of Hyperion image was also done to analyses the advantage. When
all this parameter was processed, then final overlay map with potential zone was derived.
Finally, NDVI was derived to analyses the presence of aquifer in the zone. The aquifer map
was compared with potential zone map to analyses the potential zone derived.

207

Figure 01: Study Area Sri Perumbudur

Multispectral Analysis
As we can see in the map the tree features are dominant in the study area which are:Argillaceous and calcareous sandstone and Granet-biotite-sillimanite graphite gneiss. Theclay is in least quantity in the area. The sand and silt is found only in the south eastern andsouthern part of the study area.
Figure 02: Geology Map

Figure 03: Soil Map

The map shows the area has 6 different types of soil which are: Clay, Clay loam, Sand,Loamy sand, Miscellaneous land, Sandy clay loam, and Sandy loam. The western part of thestudy area is dominated by loamy sand. The eastern part of the study area is covered by theclay soils and less part is loamy sand. The study area shows good proportion of loamy sandwhich helps in higher level of water penetration.
208

Lineament Map and Geomorphological Map
This map shows that the maximum fractured areas in the study area are in western part. Morefractured areas were found in the northern and southern part of the study area in compare to
the central part of the study area. The maximum fracture lines are parallel to the easternboundary of the study area which is also a coastal line. The western part of the area has lessnumber of fractures in compare to the eastern part. This map shows the geomorphologic
features of the study area and 4 geomorphologic features are identified in the study area which
is: Alluvial Plain, Coastal Plain, Flood Plain, Pedi plain Structural hill. As we can see the coastal
plain is found along the coastal line and the alluvial plain is found in the western central part ofthe study area, Pedi plain is found in the west northern and west southern part of the study
area and the flood plain is found in a linear manner in the central part of the study area. High
percolation of groundwater is found in the coastal plain and the others having low percolation
capacity.
Figure 04: Geomorphological Map

Figure 05: Lineament Map

Figure 06: Land use and Land cover Map

Table 01: Land use Classification in Area
Land use Classification
Vegetation
Water bodies
Settlement
Wasteland
Total

Area (in Hectares)
15129.4
2957.450087.3
6741.074915.5

209

The map shows settlements, water bodies, vegetation and wasteland of the area. Here thewater bodies are very less and the settlements are more in the area. The LULC map suggeststhat there is high population attraction due to satisfactory water availability.
Hyperion Analysis
Figure 08: Spectral Index Map

Figure 09: Layer Stacking Map

Soil and Geology Map
The layer stacking has been done using band 10, 20 and 31 for soil and geology the layer
stacking helps to derive the yellow colour, which helps in identifying the various soil and rocktype by deriving the spectral reflectance in the map. The soil line of the soil reflectancespectra, characterizes the soil type, defines vegetation indices, and corrects the plant canopy
reflectance from the optical soil property effects. Also with same band combination andreflectance geology can be identified. Therefore, the reflectance value suggests mostly thearea is covered with the clayey materials. Also granite is identified with wavelength of least
reflectance value. The lesser reflectance value suggests that they have very minimum
capacity of holding water for soil. This compactness, porosity and permeability characterize thearea capability to penetrate water and recharge in the natural aquifer beneath.
Lineament Map
The map shows lineament distribution of the study area. The lineament shows the fractures ofthe land which will penetrate or allow the water to percolate into the reach water table. The
lineament which is derived using band no.4 shows that the region is having high density oflineament present especially in the southern part of the covered study area. Therefore, we canestimate high penetration.
Fig 10: Lineament Map

Figure 11: NDVI Map

210

Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)The area basically shows coverage of medium level of vegetation coverage but also in few
patches are of higher vegetation. Water body’s area also identified along where higher
vegetation coverage is found. The area is maximum under medium coverage of vegetation,
which signifies that soil holds enough moisture for plants to grow. Also soil and geology helps
to promote its growth. After analyzing of all the features from the settled parameters the maps
have been overlay upon each other and with help of overlay analysis the potential zone map
has been prepared. Following were the ranks and weightage to given to each map before
overlaying them: With the given parameters the followed map was derived and that was dividedinto three different zones:
 Medium potential zone
 Low potential zone
 High potential zone
Table 02: Weightage and Ranking
Parameters

Ranking

GeologyLineamentGeomorphology
Soil1
2
3
4Weightage(% of influence)
40
35
15
10

Figure 12: Potential Zone Map (LISS-IV)

Figure 13: Potential Zone Map (HYPERION)

Potential Groundwater Zone Map
An overlay map has been prepared to show the possible potential zone for groundwater. The map
has been divided into three zones. The zones are marked as I, II and III. The derived map
suggests that the eastern part is highly potential zone with suitable geology and geomorphology
combination to enhance its aquifer to recharge and store the water. The western side is basicallymedium potential zone and the northern zone is low potential it’s a minimum area. Therefore, wecan say the area is having good potential zone. So the area is having satisfactory water
potential in this area. Therefore, with done analysis and available data we can say that there isaquifer present in zone. Along with information that it has satisfactory groundwater level andquality we can say that it is recharged regularly and this helps it maintain its quality and marks it tobe safe.
The groundwater zone map has been prepared using Hyperion image. The rasters of soil,geology and lineament are overlaid upon each other. The map is divided into three potential
zones that is high, medium and low potential water zone. The maximum zone comes under
medium potential zone and the southern part is having high potential zone. But the areashows that there is good amount of lineament distribution, which shows that there is goodsource of water penetration to charge water table. Hence we can say that area is satisfactorily
potential for groundwater.
211

Aquifer MapThe principal aquifer system map has been derived from the secondary source. Here themap shows various aquifers formed over the area and is compared with the derived potentialzone map. As per the principal aquifer system suggests that aquifers are mainly formed out offour type rock system. The soil and the rock promote the storage and recharge of theaquifers. The prepared map of the potential zone when compared with the aquifer map it
shows that aquifers are found mainly in the areas where there is suitable combination of soil,
geology, geomorphology, soil and lineament. The zone where medium and high potentialzone are concentrated, there mainly aquifers are spotted in the map. Hence we can interpretthat potential zone helps aquifer to develop.
Figure 14: Principal Aquifer System

Conclusion
While working with two different sets of satellite images different features were observed while
processing and analyzing: For multispectral image processing there should be satellite imageas well as geochemical data to derive the overlay analysis due to lesser amount of bands
whereas for hyperspectral image geochemical maps can be derived using the specific bandcombination. There are more than 100 bands so combination of bands can be selected as perrequirement. In terms of area multispectral cover larger area in shorter temporal resolution i.e.
5 days, but hyperspectral covers lesser area in temporal resolution of 200 days. So to be
keeping updated and cover larger area multispectral is more preferable. Multispectral hasbetter spatial resolution but resolution for hyperspectral it’s not so clearer since the former has
5.8m and later has 30m resolution.
For processing and interpreting multispectral it’s easier as we derive can true colour
composite easily than processing Hyperion. Through the study it has being identified that
there cannot be full assurance of recharging the water table, through remote sensing analysis.
As we can find out that there is maximum content of clay which signifies that there is highamount of porosity but this doesn’t contribute for recharging aquifers as the specific yield tends
to be negative. Hence it can be suggested that Hyperion is better for analysing potential zones
as the geophysical data can be derived with the Hyperion image. Better thematic layouts
can be given from the Hyperion image. As a limitation we can say that there should beground truth verification to suggest about presence and recharge of aquifers.
References
1. Adams, John B., Smith, M.O., and Gillespie, A.R. ( 1993) Imaging Spectroscopy:
Interpretation Based on
2. Anbazhagan S, Jothibasu A (2014) Geoinformatics in groundwater potential
mapping and sustainable development: a case study from southern India. Hydrol. Sci.
Journal.
3. Anuradha. C.T. and Prabhavathy S. ( 2010) “Water resources management for
Virudhunagar District using remote sensing and GIS”. International Journal of Earth
Sciences and Engineering, 3(1): 55-61, Spl. issue,
4. Ashok Kumar L. and Shanmugam S. (2014) “Hyperspectral band selection and212

classification of Hyperion image of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, eastern India”
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
5. Babu Ganesh. O and Sashikkumar M.C. ( 2009) Demarcation of groundwater rechargepotential zones for 7(1):65–75CrossRef
6. Bagyaraj M, Ramkumar T, Venkatramanan S, Gurugnanam B (2013) Application of remotesensing and GIS
7. G.P. Thomas (2012) Hyperspectral Imaging Methods, Benefits and Applications 89–105.
8. Ganapuram Sreedhar, Vijaya Kumar. G.T, Murali Krishna I.V., Kahya Ercan Cuneyd
Demirel (2009) Mapping of groundwater potential zones in the Musi basin using remotesensing data and GIS
9. Introduction to Hyperspectral Imaging (2012) TNT MIPS analysis for identifying
groundwater potential zone in parts of Kodaikanal Taluk, South India. Front Earth Sci
Hyperspectral Image Analysis Keonjhar (Orissa), India
10. Klemas Victor and Pieterse Aline (2010) Using Remote Sensing to Map and Monitor Water
Resource in Arid and Semiarid Regions
11. Meijerink, A.M.J., Gieske, A.S.M and Vekerdy, Z., (2005) Surface energy balance using
satellite data for the water balance of a traditional irrigation-wetland system in SW Iran.
Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 19, pp.
12. Nag S.K. (2005) Application of lineament density and Hydro geomorphology to delineate
groundwater potential zones of Baghmundi block in Purulia district, West Bengal. Journalof the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, Vol. 33, No. 4
13. Pieter’s, Carle M. And Angler, Peter A.J. (eds.) (2001) Remote Geochemical Analysis:
Elemental and
14. Saraf, A.K. and Chowdhury, ER. (1998) Integrated remote sensing and GIS forgroundwater exploration and identification of artificial recharge sites. International J. ofRemote Sensing, 19(10): 1825-1841.
15. Sekhar Ashok (2001) Mineral abundance mapping using hyperion dataset in parts ofUdaipur (Rajasthan) and16. Selvam. G, Banukumar.K, Srinivasan.D, Selvakumar.R and Alaguraja.P. (2011)
Identification of groundwater potential zone in hard rock terrain – A case study from partsof Manapparai block Tamilnadu using Remote Sensing and GIS techniques International
Journal of Advances in Remote Sensing and GIS
17. Srinivasa Rao, Y., Reddy, T.V.K. and Nayudu, P.T. (2000) Groundwater targeting in a hardrock terrain using fracture- pattern modeling, Niva River Basin, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 8, pp. 494.

213