Report / Fiscal Year of 2005

Project on Infrastructure Improvement for
Rationalization of International Energy Use"Project on Improvement in Infrastructure for Energy
Management in ASEAN Countries"(Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation
For
Energy Management
Under
SOME-METI Program (2005 – 2006))

March 2006

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
The Energy Conservation Center, Japan

Contents
Contents
SummaryI

Objectives and Background of the Project........................................................................I-1

II

ASEAN Energy Management System: Discussion and Study on the Utilization of
Existing Implementation Organizations.......................................................................... II-1

II-1

Summary..................................................................................................................... II-1

II-2

Intensive Discussion and Survey on the Possibility of Utilizing the Facilities andServices of the Existing Implementation Organizations in ASEAN Countries.......... II-2
II-2-1 Indonesia ...................................................................................................... II-2
II-2-2 Malaysia ....................................................................................................... II-8
II-2-3 The Philippines........................................................................................... II-13
II-2-4 Vietnam ...................................................................................................... II-21
II-2-5 Thailand...................................................................................................... II-28

II-3

Results of the Discussion and Study on the Proposal for How to Utilize the Existing
Implementation Organizations in ASEAN Countries............................................... II-33
II-3-1 Functions to Be Required for the ASEAN Energy Management System andScope of Services and Facilities for the Existing Implementation Organization
to Be Able to Provide ................................................................................. II-33
II-3-2 Proposal for Utilizing the Existing Implementation Organizations in the
ASEAN Energy Management System ....................................................... II-34

III Introduction of the Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Major
Industries and Buildings.................................................................................................III-1
III-1

Summary....................................................................................................................III-1

III-2

Basic Plan for the Award System Proposed by the Japanese Side and Results of
Discussion with the Focal Points...............................................................................III-2
III-2-1 Outline of the Plan Proposed by the Japanese Side and Discussion with the
Focal Points .................................................................................................III-2
III-2-2 Results of the Discussion during the Visits to ASEAN Countries and theAmended Plan .............................................................................................III-2

III-3

Results of Discussion on the Proposed Basic Plan of the Award System and the Policyof Implementation in the Future ................................................................................III-3
III-3-1 Final Basic Plan and the Policy of Implementation ....................................III-3
III-3-2 Research Forum in Japan ............................................................................III-3

IV Policy on Future Activities to Develop the ASEAN Energy Management System ....... IV-1
IV-1

Proposed Basic Plan of the ASEAN Energy Management System and its Operation
Procedure................................................................................................................... IV-1
IV-1-1 Outcome of Discussion in the Research and Study Workshop in Japan (July
2005)............................................................................................................ IV-1
IV-1-2 Proposed Plan of ASEAN Energy Management System and Procedure to
Work the System ......................................................................................... IV-3

IV-2

Proposed Future Policies on Establishment of the ASEAN Energy Management
System ....................................................................................................................... IV-5

V

Results of Discussion in the Summary and Post Workshops .......................................... V-1

V-1

Results of Discussion on the Basic Plan of ASEAN Energy Management System andProcedure to Work The System .................................................................................. V-1

V-2

Results of Discussion on Proposed Scope of Services and System for Utilization of the
Existing Implementation Organizations of Each Country in the ASEAN Energy
Management System .................................................................................................. V-1

V-3

Results of Discussion on Proposed Basic Plan for the Award System of Best Practices
in Energy Management for Major Industries and Buildings and Procedure to Operate
the System in the ASEAN Energy Management System ........................................... V-2

V-4

Policy on the Future Activities and Proposal of the Basic Implementation Plan for2006 to 2007 ............................................................................................................... V-2

VI Reference Materials
VI-1

Documents Used for Intensive Survey and Discussion the Implementation
Organizations of Each Country

VI-2

Materials Used for the Summary and Post Workshops

Summary
The rapid economic development of the ASEAN (the Association of Southeast Asian Nations)member countries is continuing and it is expected that their energy consumption will also
grow rapidly in the future. Therefore, efficient use of energy and measures for preventing
global warming will become even more necessary than ever.
This program is one of the main projects under ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy
Cooperation (APAEC) and is named PROMEEC (Promotion of Energy Efficiency andConservation) in ASEAN, which was authorized by ASEAN Ministers of Energy Meeting(AMEM). This program consists of three projects, “major industries,” “buildings” and“improvement in infrastructure for energy management”, hereinafter referred to as
PROMEEC (Major Industries), PROMEEC (Buildings) and PROMEEC (Energy
Management) respectively.
The fiscal year of 2005 is the sixth year of implementation of PROMEEC (Major Industries)
and PROMEEC (buildings). The efforts to implement the activities by the counterparts suchas the focal points of the respective countries including ASEAN Center for Energy (ACE) arebecoming more established and active. Awareness of the need for a reduction in energy
consumption has started to penetrate into these countries, due to rising energy prices caused
by a recent continuous steep rises in oil prices and with the Kyoto Protocol effectuated on
February 16th, 2005.
This fiscal year was also situated as the second year of Phase-2 of the PROMEEC project. In
Phase-2, the ASEAN countries are expected to make self-help efforts to implement anddisseminate the improvement measures which were acquired during the previous phase.
Therefore, in fiscal year of 2005, continuing on from the previous fiscal year, we aimed toestablish a system to implement and disseminate the improvement measures which werediscussed and proposed in each ASEAN country. These measures were discussed andproposed based on the achievements and the results of the energy audits which were carriedout at various factories and buildings in ASEAN countries in the past.
To achieve this target more effectively, the PROMEEC (Energy Management) was establishedand launched in 2004, in addition to PROMEEC (Major Industries) and PROMEEC(Buildings). This project was started based on the agreement reached through consultations
with the focal points of the ASEAN countries. The purpose of this project is to improve andenhance the energy management infrastructure in ASEAN countries, which is an importantbasis for promoting energy conservation. Ideally, in this project, we will aim to establish the“ASEAN Energy Management System” which can be shared with the ten ASEAN countries,
within four or five years.
Therefore in the fiscal year of 2005, which is the second year of this project, we implemented
the following activities. These activities were based on the results of the previous year’s
fact-finding studies on the existing systems and infrastructure for energy management in theten ASEAN countries, as well as the established basic concept of “ASEAN Energy
Management System.”♦ Research and Study Workshop in Japan (July 25th, 2005 – July 29th, 2005)

We invited concerned persons including the focal points of the ten ASEAN countries to the1workshop. The workshop consisted of the lecture on the policy on energy management, theactivities in enterprises for promoting energy conservation including visits to factories andbuildings and the discussion on the plan / required functions for the “ASEAN Energy
Management System”.
♦ Intensive survey on the possibilities of sharing facilities and services of the existing

implementation organizations in ASEAN countries
We did survey on facilities owned and services provided by the existing implementation
organizations in five ASEAN countries, or Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam andThailand. The surveys focused on whether or not the existing implementation
organizations have intensions and whether or not there are possibilities for the
implementing organizations to provide the ASEAN countries with their facilities andservices. These services are namely energy audits, various programs of training andinformation services.
♦ Development of the basic plan for “ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy

Management for Major Industries and Buildings”
We established the basic plan for the award system. The purpose of this system is to collectinformation on the best practices in energy management for major industries and buildings
and disseminate in ASEAN countries. Firstly, ECCJ (The Energy Conservation Center,
Japan) proposed a plan. Next, the plan was discussed and revised based on the outcome of
the consultations with the focal points of the five ASEAN countries. Then the plan was
basically agreed through the discussion with the focal points of the ten countries in theSummary and Post Workshops, and finally established the basic plan. In accordance withthe agreed plan, some members of the judging committee were selected, and the Research
Forum in Japan was held in March 2006 by inviting the selected judging committee
members. The basic proposal of the application form was finally prepared based on thediscussion made by the participants at this forum.
♦ Development of the basic plan for the “ASEAN Energy Management System”

Based on the outcome of the above survey and consultation, ECCJ prepared a proposal fora basic plan for the “ASEAN Energy Management System.” The plan was discussed withthe representatives of the ten ASEAN countries and finalized in the Summary and Post
Workshops.
As a result of the above activities, it was able to establish the basic plan for the “ASEAN
Energy Management System” and to have started preparing some of its functions to be
included in the system for working into practice from the fiscal year of 2006. In particular, wewere able to establish the basic plan for the award system for best practices in energy
management for major industries and buildings with a target to start working from April 2006.
The on-site activities of the project for the fiscal year of 2005 was started with the Inception
Workshop which was held in late June 2005, and ended with the Summary and Post
Workshops which were held in late January 2006. These workshops are common with the
projects for major industries and buildings.
For the purpose of smoothly starting the project activities, in the Inception Workshop, we
2

explained and finalized the implementation plan and confirmed the status of the preparations
for the on-site activities with the participating members. After this workshop, we were able tosmoothly carry out the intensive survey and discussion at the existing implementation
organizations in the five ASEAN countries.
In the Summary and Post Workshops, under attendance of the representatives (focal points) of
the ASEAN countries participated, we reported the results and achievements of the activities
implemented in the ten countries, so that the outcomes could be shared among the ASEAN
member countries. Then, the future direction of the project, including the basic
implementation plan of the project for FY 2006 was also discussed.
The following are the specific activities of the PROMEEC (Energy Management) project in
the fiscal year of 2005.
June 30th, 2005 - July 1st, 2005 (The period of the business trip was from June 29th to July
2nd):
“Inception Workshop on Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation (PROMEEC)(Major Industry, Building and Energy Management), SOME – METI Work Program 2005 2006.”
The workshop was held in Manila, in the Philippines. The workshops for the “majorindustries,” “buildings” and “improvements of energy management systems” were held
together.
Although the representative from Myanmar was absent, fourteen members consisted of therepresentatives from the ASEAN countries and the ASEAN Center for Energy (ACE)including the representatives of the Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ) participated.
The following activities were carried out in the workshop.
Opening addresses by representatives of the concerned parties, including the host country
Session 1: Presentation on “Highlights of the PROMEEC Project Accomplishment” and“Promotion of Best Practices in Industries in Japan” (presented by ECCJ)
Session 2: What was learned and what is expected from the PROMEEC Project (presented
by the representatives of the ASEAN countries)
Session 3: Explanation, discussion and finalization of the implementation plan for 2005 –2006 (led by ECCJ)
July 25th, 2005 - July 29th, 2005: Implementation of the “Research and Study Workshop in
Japan”
Twenty participants, including the focal points from the ten countries and ACE, gathered forthe workshop. In the workshop, the participants brainstormed ideas of the plan for the“ASEAN Energy Management System” and its required functions. This program wasconducted as a part of the multi-country training programs on energy conservation. The
program included the lectures on governmental policy and measures for energy managementin Japan and the visits to factories to deepen the participants’ understanding of the voluntary
activities of improvement for energy conservation by Japanese companies. On the last day ofthe program, we setup the brainstorm session to create ideas of the plan for the “ASEAN
3

Energy Management System” and its required functions. The issue was vigorously discussed
and the program was completed successfully.
September 4th, 2005 - September 14th, 2005: The first local activities
The following activities were carried out in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines.
1.

Intensive survey and discussion on the possibilities and intension for the existing
implementation organizations to provide other ASEAN countries with their facilities andservices
We visited the existing implementation organizations in the above three countries andconducted surveys on the facilities and services of the implementation organizations. In
the surveys, we also discussed whether these organizations had the possibility andintension to provide the other ASEAN countries with the facilities and services owned by
them.

2.

Discussion on the proposed basic plan for the “ASEAN Award System of Best Practices
in Energy Management for Major Industries and Buildings”
We explained to and discussed with the focal points and concerned persons in therespective countries about the draft plan which we had prepared beforehand. We also
asked them about their requests for the plan.

October 18th, 2005 - October 27th, 2005: The second local activities
The following activities were carried out in Vietnam and Thailand.
1.

Intensive survey and discussion on the possibilities and intension for the existing
implementation organizations to provide other ASEAN countries with their facilities andservices
We visited the existing implementation organizations in the above two countries andconducted surveys on the facilities and services of the implementation organizations. In
the surveys, we also discussed whether these organizations had the possibility andintension to provide the other ASEAN countries with the facilities and services owned by
them.

2.

Discussion on the proposed basic plan for the “ASEAN Award System of Best Practices
in Energy Management for Major Industries and Buildings”
We explained to and discussed with the focal points and concerned persons in therespective countries about the draft plan which we had prepared beforehand. We also
asked them about their requests for the plan

January 25th, 2006 - January 28th, 2006: Summary and Post Workshops“Summary Workshop and Post Workshop on Promotion of Energy Efficiency andConservation (PROMEEC) (Major Industry, Building and Energy Management), SOME METI Work Program 2005 - 2006.”
The workshops were held in Bandung, Indonesia. The workshops for the “major industries,”“buildings” and “improvements of energy management systems” were held together.

4

Although the focal points of Myanmar, Singapore and Vietnam were absent, twenty-two
members consisted of representatives from the ASEAN countries, the ASEAN Center for
Energy (ACE) and the Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ) participated in theworkshops. The summary of the activities and discussions were made in the workshops.
Firstly, ECCJ reported the results and achievements of the activities in the fiscal year of 2005,
namely the “Research and Study Workshop in Japan” and the two above-mentioned local
activities. We then explained and discussed proposals for the basic plan of the “ASEAN
Energy Management System,” as well as the proposed basic implementation plan for 2006 2007.
The following two points were especially valuable outcomes. Namely, firstly, the basic planfor the “ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Major Industries
and Buildings” was established, agreed and has become ready to be implemented from thefiscal year of 2006. Secondly, the proposed basic plan of the “ASEAN Management System”
are becoming more established and concrete.
Opening addresses by representatives of the concerned parties including the host country
Summary Workshop
Session 1: Major industries
Session 2: Buildings
Session 3: Energy management- Report on the accomplishment of the activities in the fiscal year of 2005
- Explanation and discussion on the proposed basic plan of the “ASEAN Energy
Management System”- Basic direction of the activities after the fiscal year of 2006, including the basic
implementation plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) for 2006 – 2007
Post Workshop
Session 1: Confirmation of the results of discussion for each project made in the Summary
WorkshopSession 2: Basic implementation plan after the fiscal year of 2006, including the basic
implementation plans of the three PROMEEC projects for 2006 – 2007
As a summary, we implemented the higher-level of activities in the fiscal year of 2005,
pursuing the enhanced self-help efforts by the ASEAN member countries, aiming at the
support for the ASEAN countries to in steadily establish a system or infrastructure forsustainable energy conservation activities.
The PROMEEC (Energy Management) project is situated as an important one to build suchan infrastructure. Based on the surveys and studies made in these two years, we were able toestablish the following for the purpose of providing more specific services under the“ASEAN Energy Management System”.
(1) More concrete basic plan for the “ASEAN Energy Management System.”5(2)The award system of best practices in energy management for major industries andbuildings to be executed after the fiscal year of 2006
These are the most valuable outcome of the fiscal year of 2005.
Finally, for the implementation of this project, we were able to gain full cooperation from thepeople in charge of this project in the respective concerned organizations of the ASEAN
countries. We would like to express our sincere appreciation for the cooperation.

6

I

Objectives and Background of the Project

The objective of this project is to explore and propose measures for efficient use of energy inthe countries and the regions which contribute to a stable energy supply for Japan, through theinvestigation and analyses on the energy policies and tendency of energy consumption,
provision of advice on efficient use of energy by exchanging resource persons, targeting tobuild a stable and suitable infrastructure for energy supply and demand to meet theinternational and domestic economic and social environment.
By building the infrastructure and basis for energy management for the purpose of promoting
energy conservation in the major industries and buildings, in order to achieve the above
objective, the PROMEEC (Energy Management) aims at contributing to the promotion ofenergy conservation and environmental protection through the promotion in realizing energy
conservation measures in Southeast Asian nations by assisting the activities of ASEAN.
This project was established in 2004, and is called “PROMEEC (Energy Management)” in the
ASEAN side. PROMEEC is the abbreviation for the “Promotion of Energy Efficiency andConservation.” It is a collaboration program between the Ministry of Economy, Trade andIndustry (METI) and ASEAN, approved by the ASEAN Ministers on Energy Meeting(AMEM). METI-ECCJ is technically and operationally cooperating with ASEAN bysupporting ASEAN both in the establishment of the infrastructure and basis for energy
management essential for promoting energy conservation in the industry and building sectorsof ASEAN countries and in the realization of improvement. We are also cooperating by
supporting improvements of the system from a technical and operational point of view.
The goals of this project are to establish the following.
1.

Sustainable infrastructure and system for energy management called as the “ASEAN
Energy Management System” which can be shared by the ASEAN countries andcontributing to the promotion of energy conservation in the industrial and building
sectors.

2.

Specific functions for the “ASEAN Energy Management System” to provide customers
with facilities and services to assist the activities for implementing and disseminating
various improvement for energy conservation, such as energy audit, training services andinformation provision, including rule to smoothly and properly work these functions in
the “ASEAN Energy Management System”

3.

Effective collaboration with the PROMEEC (Major Industries) and PROMEEC(Buildings) for the purpose of sharing information and utilization of accomplishments ofthe projects to disseminate the outcomes, and so on.

This project was established based on the experience and the achievements of PROMEEC(Major Industries) and PROMEEC (Buildings) being implemented since 2000. Namely, thisproject was established in the fiscal year of 2004, as a new project of PROMEEC, to promote
improvements in energy management which is the common issue for both PROMEEC (major
Industries) and PROMEEC (Buildings) and is the most effective measures for energy
conservation.
To achieve the above-mentioned goals, the activities for a long term of approximately 5 years
I-1

will be required and the PROMEEC (Energy Management) has been implemented based on
the following stepwise approach.
[The first stage]
Development of the plan of the “ASEAN Energy Management System”, based on theinvestigation on the actual situations of the infrastructure and basis for energy management in
ASEAN countries and on the transfer of technologies and experience realized in Japan.
[The second stage]
Establishment of the “ASEAN Energy Management System” including measures andprocedures to work the system[The third stage]
Actual operation to work the “ASEAN Energy Management System” and improvement of thesystemDuring the past two years, the activities of the first stage have been almost completed, and theactual activities have shifted to a level of the second stage. Through the activities in the fiscal
year of 2005, the basic plan for the “ASEAN Energy Management System” was establishedand the activities to develop the “ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy
Management” as one of the activities the second stage have been implemented towardrealization to work the award system.
Following the above activities, we will enhance the various activities for the second stage of
the ASEAN Energy Management System, and will move on to the activities for the third stage
to implement and work any of the systems which are completed and ready for implementation
or operation.
This project was actually implemented by the Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ), andwas conducted mainly by the following two members who were in charge of the project.
Mr. Kazuhiko Yoshida

General Manager, International Engineering Department

Mr. Takashi Sato

Technical Expert, International Engineering Department

I-2

II

ASEAN Energy Management System: Discussion and Study on the Utilization of
Existing Implementation Organizations

II-1

Summary

In the fiscal year of 2004, the ECCJ and ASEAN team conducted investigation on the present
situations of the actual infrastructure and basis for energy management in the ten ASEAN
countries. The investigation includes that of the existing implementation organizations. The
results of the investigation confirmed the existence of some implementing organizations
which promote energy conservation through conducting energy audit and training for factories
and buildings. Based on the results of the investigation, it was considered that these existing
implementation organizations could provide services and facilities to the other ASEAN
countries and that utilization of the existing organizations would be the most realistic andfeasible method to be tried first.
In the fiscal year of 2005, therefore, based on the actual result of the investigation made in thefiscal year of 2004 and on the recommendation by the focal points, the team visited majororganizations which were providing services such as energy audits and training. The teaminvestigated the actual services and facilities provided by the organizations and discussed thepossibility and intension for these organizations to provide customers in the other ASEAN
countries with their services and facilities. Specifically, the team visited the implementing
organizations in five countries, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand andVietnam and sent the questionnaire to Singapore to investigate the above-mentioned issues. In
actual, the team carried out investigation on twenty implementation organizations all together,including ESCOs (energy service companies).
As a result, it was confirmed that all these implementation organizations were eager toprovide their services to other ASEAN countries. The fact shows a high possibility that we
can utilize the existing implementation organizations as an important function in the “ASEAN
Energy Management System”.
What shall be done next is to discuss and establish the procedure and system for the clients in
the ASEAN countries to utilize these implementation organizations.
The details are described in the following sections.

II-1

II-2

Intensive Discussion and Survey on the Possibility of Utilizing the Facilities andServices of the Existing Implementation Organizations in ASEAN Countries

II-2-1Indonesia

Summary of Survey(1)

Outline of the activities
The initial plan was to meet the focal points of the Indonesian Ministry of Energy andMineral Resources (MEMR) and other interested parties, to explain and exchange ideas
on our proposal for the award system of best practices in energy management forindustries and buildings. However, due to their busy schedule, we decided to receive
their comments and opinions at a later date.
One person from the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and one person fromthe ASEAN Center for Energy (ACE) joined us at the meetings with persons from theimplementing organizations.
At each meeting with the organizations or the companies, we first explained the whole
picture of the PROMEEC Projects and the role including the objectives and specifics of
the PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project, as well as the purpose of the survey. We
then verified the answers in the questionnaire which we had distributed beforehand, anddiscussed whether the organizations had the possibility of cooperating as one of theimplementation organizations for the ASEAN Energy Management System. We also
discussed the conditions for the cooperation.

(2)

Survey schedule and main interviewees
Date
September 4
September 5Organization visited
Arrive at Jakarta
Education and Training Center for
Energy and Electricity (ETCEE)
Ministry of Energy and Mineral
Resources (MEMR)
KONEBA

September 6
September 7

1.1

GOGINDO Daya Bersama,
Leave Jakarta

Main interviewees of the organization
Mr.Kansman Hutabarat (Head)

Mr. Gannet Pontjowinoto(President, Director)
Mr.Sri Djoko (President, Director)

Organizations visited for discussion and survey

1.1-1 Education and Training Center for Energy and Electricity (ETCEE)[Interviewees]
Mr. Kansman Hutabarat (Head)
Mr. Zendra Permana Zen (Head, Energy and Electricity Development)

II-2

(1)

Outline of the organization
The organization was established in 2001 mainly as an education and training center for
officials of central and local governments. It is a 100% state-owned organization under
the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR). They mainly provide
education and training to governmental officials, but also conduct energy audits.

(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
System
According to the chief executive of ETCEE, they have the basis in terms offacilities and capacity, so it is possible to receive trainees from foreign countries as
one of the implementation organizations of the ASEAN Energy Management
System. They are willing to consider involvement in the system. As a state-owned
organization, they are required to report their activities to the government, but they
can implement projects independently.
They indicated the conditions which are needed for the actual cooperation, such ascollection of the fees from the trainees, official assistance from the government, as
well as expansion and improvement of the facilities. However, as a whole, they
showed a very keen and positive attitude towards the proposal. They also might
expect the following, if they participate in PROMEEC as an implementation
organization of the ASEAN Energy Management System.
- Technical assistance from ECCJ They might also have a vague expectation that- Introduction of training facilities through assistance of Japan, possibly through
JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency)
The positive attitude of the ETCEE staff was impressive. ETCEE is an attractive
candidate as an implementation organizations of the ASEAN Energy Management
System in the future.
(b) Situation of existing resources/infrastructure
They presently have sixty-five staff, twenty of them are technicians and aroundthree staffs are economists. They mainly conduct education programs on energy
conservation, which put major emphasis on buildings and building facilities.
The training center building has three floors above ground and one undergroundfloor. The lecture rooms are large and spacious. Although handmade, they havesimulation equipment for the operation of electric facilities such as motors andlighting facilities. They also have photovoltaic systems, wind turbines and theequipment for the simulated operation of a small-scale hydropower generator. They
are equipped with measurement instruments which are used in the training, such as
different sort of equipment for electricity measurement, as well as gas analyzers.
Besides they have laboratories and a library as well. Although the training is carriedout in Indonesian and the textbooks are written in Indonesian, the lecturers candeliver the lectures in English. Some staffs who we met were able to have
conversations in English sufficiently well. There is a language laboratory in theII-3training center so that the trainees can practice English there. According to them,
they bring in twenty trainees for one training program, but the above-mentioned
training facilities are not sufficient to accommodate the number of trainees that theyhost. This is because of a lack of budget. At present, the trainees are principally
supposed to stay in hotels, but it is also possible to stay in the training center for
one or two nights, although the trainees have to share rooms for accomodation.
They have a plan to construct a dormitory-style accommodation facility, hopefullyby the end of next year.
1.1-2 KONEBA[Interviewees]
Mr. Gannet Pontjowinoto (President Director)
Mr. Judianto Hasan (Operation/Marketing Director)
Ms. Julia Indrayani Puar (Technical Manager)(1)

Outline of the organization
This state-owned company was founded in 1987, and is the implementation
organization of the government foe energy conservation. Their operations consist ofenergy audits and training, as well as various projects including their own ESCO
business. According to them, unlike the previous year, the energy situation has fallen
into a critical state, and the surroundings of the implementation of energy conservation
have changed dramatically. The changes were remarkable after July 2006, when the“Presidential Instruction and then the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources
Decree” on energy conservation were issued. In response to this change, they already
added six staffs this year, and are planning to add around five more staffs. They
presently have sixty staffs including twenty-six engineers. Most of the engineers areexperienced workers with more than ten years experience.
As for business, they implement energy audits for industries and buildings, as well as
training, and engineering for projects including the ESCO business and consulting
services on energy management.
Regarding the facilities, they only have an ordinary office, meeting rooms but have no
training rooms inside the KONEBA buildings, so they rent a hotel and its facilities tohold the training courses. They are equipped with measurement hardware for the energy
audits. They almost have sufficient facilities.
They requested support from ECCJ, including provision of various sorts of information.
Therefore, we explained again about the specifics of the present activities of the threeprojects of PROMEEC, and how the establishment of the ASEAN Energy Management
System would effectively meet their needs. They have understood the value of the
project very well, and showed great expectations for the future development of thisproject. We had thought before the visit that KONEBA was likely to participate in thisproject, in reality, they were much more eager than we expected.

II-4

(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
SystemSimilar to ETCEE, KONEBA was also very keen to implement the energy audits
and the training in other countries, as one of the implementation organizations of
the ASEAN Energy Management System. According to KONEBA, although they
are a state-owned company, they have independent management authority for
implementing the projects, and so they do not need to gain approval from thegovernment. The conditions for the implementation were to secure the financial
resources, including the collection of fees from clients, as well as financial
assistances from public institutions such as the government. However, they did nothave a plan to construct any new training rooms or accommodation facilities for the
training programs. Instead, they were planning to utilize external commercial
facilities such as hotels. This was different from the plan that ETCEE expressed.
(b) Situation of the existing resources/infrastructure
KONEBA was established in 1987 as a state-owned company for energy
conservation, which would be engaged exclusively in energy conservation projects
in general. Therefore, the company has a certain level of equipment for energy audit
and is implementing training programs. However, the business basis is becoming
weaker, partly because of the change in the management / business environment.
They struggle with securing the experts to carry out the energy audits or the training.
There are presently less than twenty experts who can carry out the energy audits or
the training in the company. In this situation, the other registered nine privatecompanies are carrying out the training independently or they sometimes carry out
the training in collaboration with KONEBA. KONEBA is also providing consulting
services, including many energy audits and advice on policy for the government.
KONEBA is the only existing implementation organization specialized for energy
conservation, and so strengthening the organization of KONEBA will be necessary,for example official assignment of specific role under the law when the law islegislated.
(c) Recent situation of energy in Indonesia
The president of KONEBA explained recent changes in the situation in Indonesia.
According to the explanation, the Indonesian enterprises are alarmed by andstrongly objecting to the government’s plan to quickly eliminate its subsidies on
prices on energy such as fuel oil, natural gas and electricity, because the plan would
threaten the continuation of their businesses. Although the electricity tariffs werechanged to reduce the peak demand, many factories are operating around the clock
and a sudden change in the tariff affects the profits of the businesses significantly.
Under such changes to the energy situation, while the “Minister of Energy andMineral Resources Decree” was issued in July, the possibilities of a concrete
improvement in the situation have not been made clear. Therefore, there are manyinquiries on how to meet the requirements specified in the “Minister of Energy andMineral Resources Decree” and demand for the energy audits are rising steeply.
KONEBA has to conduct some 300 energy audits this year, and the issue now is theII-5coverage of the cost of the energy audits.
As part of the diversification of energy sources, a natural gas pipeline is being
constructed from Sumatra to Java, and will be completed in 2007. The enterprises
cannot wait for the completion of construction and more factories are switchingfuel to coal, which is escalating the problem of environmental pollution.
On the other hand, there is more criticism of the government, questioning why they
do not conduct the energy audits in the transportation sector. KONEBA said thatthey are dismayed by requests to study such energy audits, which are put to them.
1.1-3 GOGINDO Daya Bersama[Interviewees]
Mr. Sri Djoko Parato (President Director)
Mr. Basuki Siswanto (Director of Marketing)
Ms. Cita Dewi (Business Development Manager)(1)

Outline of the organization
The company is an energy supplying company which offers wholesale supplies ofenergy, such as electricity, cold water and steam, though it is an ESCO 100% owned by
PLN which is a state-owned power company. They construct and operate cogeneration
power plants and supply energy to their clients. Their present capacity is 150 MW, andthey are planning to expand to 200 MW of capacity in the future. As a part of theirbusiness, they are providing clients with energy audits, training for its operation andmaintenance, as well as information services in the project. The company’s policy is tostart a full-scale project which focuses on energy conservation from 2006. Although
they own ninety staffs and outsource sixty staffs hence 150 staffs, there are less than
five staffs who actually can conduct the energy audits and training. The actual situationis that they are only conducting activities for energy conservation of the supply side andthe demand side including DSM (demand side management), as a part of their retailbusiness. During our survey made in 2004, officials of MEMR said that there were ten
ESCOs registered as the implementation organizations for training on energy
conservation, and GOGINDO was the best of the ten ESCOs. It seems that the reality ofthe operating situation is somewhat different.

(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
SystemThe actual business of GOGINDO and its role as the Indonesian implementation
organization was different from what we had expected before the meeting.
Nonetheless, the top management including the president was keen on participatingin the project as one of the implementation organizations of the ASEAN Energy
Management System. For actual implementation, they will need to gain approval
from their shareholder or PLN, and set up the fees on a commercial basis. Therefore,
they are requesting financial assistance from the government etc.
II-6

(b) Situation of existing resources/infrastructure
They do not have little existing infrastructure. Their main work is in wholesale
supply of electricity as a subsidiary organization of PLN. Related to this work, they
are providing operational and maintenance services to the plants, as a part of thewhole service package. According to them, they have experience in energy auditing
because the energy audits are included in this package. They have a limited numberof engineers (about two or three) who can carry out the energy audits.
1.2

Results of the discussion and survey

The ECCJ-ASEAN team visited the existing implementation organizations in each country
and investigated the facilities and the services owned by them, based on the questionnaire
prepared and distributed beforehand. We also discussed with them about the possibility ofproviding their facilities and services to other ASEAN countries under “ASEAN Energy
Management System”.
The results of discussion in Indonesia show that the three Indonesian implementing
organizations can offer their integrated services, including energy audits, training andeducation, as well as information services. It is likely to be able to utilize these existingorganizations. All the three organizations are looking forward to the future of the ASEAN
Energy Management System. Especially, ETCEE and KONEBA showed a very willing andpositive attitude towards their cooperation. These two organizations are fully equipped withtraining facilities, lecture rooms and the measurement hardware. They also seem to havesufficient capacity to take active roles as the trainers or as energy auditors.

II-7

II-2-2

Malaysia

Summary of Survey(1)

Outline of the activities
The ECCJ-ASEAN team had a meeting with Energy Commission (EC) and Ptm in
Kuala Lumpur on September 8th. The team also visited the Center for Education,
Training and Research in Renewable Energy and Efficiency (CETREE) and had ameeting with concerned people in Penang on September 9th. Similar to the activities inIndonesia, we did survey and discussed about whether the organizations had thepossibility of offering their existing functions and services to the “ASEAN Energy
Management System” for the purpose of sharing the functions and services among theASEAN countries. Moreover, the team discussed with them about the conditions fortheir cooperation, as well as their ideas for operational methods when they can provide
specific services.
The discussions proceeded efficiently thanks to their deep understanding of the specifics
of our proposed plan explained by us.
At all the organizations which we visited, the top managers of each organization
attended the meetings. Of course, each organization requested different conditions forparticipation in the project, but they said that they could offer their services andfacilities to the other ASEAN countries. Furthermore, they showed positive attitudes
towards contributing to “the ASEAN Energy Management System” through providing
services such as energy audits and training as implementation organizations. The
Malaysian organizations as well as Indonesian organizations showed such a keen
willingness to participate, that we are starting to get a better perspective on thefeasibility for future implementation. All the results so far have been better than we had
expected. We are getting ready to discuss how to utilize and manage theseorganizations.
The personnel from ACE accompanied us on the visits to these organizations. A staff
from Ptm also visited CETREE with us.
At each meeting with the organizations or the companies, we first explained the whole
picture of the PROMEEC Projects and the role including the objectives and specifics of
the PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project, as well as the purpose of the survey. We
then verified the answers in the questionnaire which we had distributed beforehand, anddiscussed whether the organizations had the possibility of cooperating as one of theimplementation organizations for the ASEAN Energy Management System. We also
discussed the conditions for the cooperation.

II-8

(2)

Survey schedule and main interviewees
Date
September 7
September 8
September 8
September 9
September 11

Organization visited
Arrive at Kuala Lumpur
Ptm, Energy Commission
Arrive at Penang
CETREE

Main interviewees of the organization
Dr. Hassan Ibrahim (Director, Energy
Efficiency and Innovation Unit)
Dr. Abdul Malek Abdul Rahman(Deputy Director)

Leave Penang

At EC, we explained and exchanged ideas with Ptm’s focal points and other concerned
people about our proposed system for the award of best practices in energy management
for major industries and buildings. EC commented that they understood the difference
between our proposal and the presently implemented award system for buildings. They
also said that they thought the aims of the proposed system were very good and wanted
us to proceed with discussions with interested parties of ASEAN to realize the system.
The award system for buildings has already been implemented, and so it is important tomake clear the difference between the existing award system for buildings and the
proposed award system. It is necessary to explain the same explanation made in thevisiting countries for the other ASEAN countries as well.
2.1

Organizations visited for discussion and survey

2.1-1 Energy Commission (EC) and Ptm[Interviewees]
Dr. Hassan Ibrahim (Director, Energy Efficiency and Innovation Unit)
Mr. Muhammad Sharul ‘Azam bin Abdul Rhaim (Assistant Director, Energy Efficiency unit)
Mr. G. Lalchand (Chief Engineer, Mensilin Holdings SDN BHD) (He is a resident consultant
with EC.)
Ms. Azah Ahmad, Research Officer, Ptm
Mr. Faizul Ramdan Zainal Abidin, Energy Engineer, Ptm(1)

Outline of the organization
The Energy Commission is the implementation organization under the Ministry ofEnergy, Water and Communications. It was founded in 2001, when the Ex - Department
of Electricity and Gas Supply was reformed. There are units handling energy
conservation and renewable energy. Dr. Hassan is the director of the energy
conservation unit. It is said that he was the key person who had proceeded withdiscussion and negotiation with Japan and Australia pursuing the possibilities ofcooperation in the late 1990s, even before the first Executive Director of ACE wasappointed. It was just after the end of the period in which cooperation between the EU(European Union) and ASEAN was agreed and implemented under exclusive conditions.
ACE was not founded at the time, but he has been recognized as the predecessor of thefirst Executive Director of ACE, and has been a key player in the cooperation between
Japan and ASEAN. He was also deeply involved in the initiation of PROMEEC, which
we are implementing now.
II-9

Although EC is an implementation organization, the number of staff is small, and so in
reality, they assign Ptm or the certified ESCOs to actually implement projects. Theirmain work is to provide advisory services to the government on political measures suchas the development of the master plan. For the implementation of the projects, they arereceiving assistance from Denmark, and employing Danish consultants in this process.
In relation to the Energy Efficiency Regulation on Electricity, which is presently inprocess of legislation in the Parliament, they have started training energy managers foraccreditation in the electricity area. According to EC, they have certified five ESCOs
and assigned the implementation of the projects to them, but only three or so companies
are actively implementing the projects.
Ptm, as well known, was established in 1998 as the implementation organization for
projects such as the MIEEEP project. Many of their activities are project based, like
MIEEEP or DSM. They mainly implement energy conservation projects through energy
audits. They have an energy audit team of five engineers and ten technicians and own
sensors and equipment sufficient for energy audits. The training is actually carried out
by the same team, on a project basis.
(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
SystemEnergy Commission (EC) has understood the basic concept and aims of theASEAN Energy Management System. As the Malaysian organization, they showeda clear intention to provide their resources to the system and said that they would
like to cooperate on the project. As for Ptm, although they are a governmentorganization, they can implement projects independently, and they do not need togain approval from EC or other government ministries but they are requested toreport their activities to the government. EC’s position on this was that there was noproblem with Ptm offering services such as energy audits to the other ASEAN
countries.
In terms of the certified ESCOs for the training of the energy managers, EC’s
position was that there was no problem with these ESCOs participating, by
providing their resources, on a business basis. Malaysia has an association of
ESCOs called as MAESCO (the Malaysian Association of ESCO), and so one wayof requesting the cooperation of ESCOs would be through this organization.
However, EC commented that there will be an issue about how to deal with theiraccreditation process, if the ESCOs are to participate in the international
cooperation. Dr. Hassan commented that it would be necessary to set up a concept
similar to AEMAS (ASEAN Energy Manager Accreditation System) in ASEAN,
although its nature would be different. We agree with his opinion, and this will be
an important issue to be considered in the process of detailed planning in the future.
(b) Situation of the existing resources/infrastructure
They are outsourcing to conduct energy audits and the training, mainly
II-10commissioning the ESCOs for the work. Therefore, they do not possess personnel
or facilities, and employs or rents these resources from external sources asnecessary.
2.1-2 Center for Education, Training and Research in Renewable Energy andEfficiency (CETREE)[Interviewees]
Dr. Abdul Malek Abdul Rahman (Deputy Director)
Mr. Badrol Hisham Mohd Nowani (Co-ordinator)(1)

Outline of the organization
The organization was established in 2000 under the 8th Malaysian Plan and initiallyoperated by receiving funds from DANIDA of Denmark. Their objective is to educate
and raise the public awareness in Malaysia on energy conservation and renewableenergy through education and training. The center is situated inside the complex of
USM (Universiti Sains Malaysia, University of Science Malaysia) in Penang. The
Ministry of Education and USM are implementing education and training on energy
conservation and renewable energy through CETREE, carrying out their responsibilities
under the Ministry of Energy, Water and Communication (MEWC).
Fourteen staffs including the administration staffs operate the center, and they areoutsourcing for lecturers and experts. The following are the main categories of theiractivities.
1) Educations targeting children in primary and secondary schools2) Educations in the universities (They have two courses.)
3) Planning and implementation of mobile exhibitions (They offer exhibitions onenergy conservation and renewable energy for housinfg, a demonstration car fueledby used cooking oil, etc.)
4) Information services for the general public
5) Training for professionals (They put a major emphasis on energy conservation andrenewable energy for building design, including energy audits for buildings.)
6) Information services through the website and activities to enhance public awareness(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
SystemThe result is that they can offer services to the other ASEAN countries utilizing
their existing facilities and personnel, and they would like to participate in the
project as an implementation organization of the ASEAN Energy Management
System. According to them, CETREE was an independent organization and they
could make decisions on their business and projects by themselves without any
approval from government ministries. If they are requested the implementation,
assuming that the existing functions and facilities are utilized, the possible services
would be the education on energy in general and energy conservation in particular
II-11

for persons from a wide rage of category from professionals for buildings throughthe top management and the general public. While the participation fees would ofcourse be collected from the participants, the fees could be low because theinfrastructure of the university is already fairly well established.
At first, they did not seem to understand the purpose of our visit or the contents of
the questionnaire distributed beforehand and were a little confused while kindly
receiving us. However, after the introductory explanation of the project by thevisiting team at the beginning of the meeting, they seemed to understand the
purpose and specifics of the project as well as the purpose of our visit at the time.
We felt that we were able to make a valuable discussion after that. Even the focal
points sometimes do not well understand all of the points of the project to an extent
for the focal point to explain it to the other concerned parties.
As this situation is expected from the start, it will be necessary to take time for
introduction prior to discussing the main issues so that the concerned people
including the focal points can fully understand the purpose and specifics of the
project.
CETREE was so eager that they asked when they would receive notice of theimplementation request from us, as if their participation was already decided. We
explained the procedure and the schedule for how the decision would be made in
the future. We explained that the next consultation, on the premise that we would
delegate the implementation to CETREE, will be held in April in 2006 or later, after
the decision is made with the focal points in the Post Workshop scheduled in
February 2006. It was impressive that they were even a little disappointed to hearthat they would have to wait for so long.
(b) Situation of the existing resources/infrastructure
The building at the university which accommodates CETREE has several large
lecture halls, and the capacity of each hall is of 150 people. They have rooms forworkshops, and for stocking the displays which are used in mobile exhibitions, aswell as rooms for the preparation of practical training. CETREE said that theywould move to a different building which was also situated inside the campus of theuniversity in the near future. After the meeting, we looked around the facilities on
the university campus. The university is situated in a spacious place with a
comfortable environment, and is very well equipped with facilities including aguesthouse, a dormitory, a canteen and a medical center.
2.2

Results of the discussion and survey

The ECCJ-ASEAN team visited the existing implementation organizations in each country
and investigated the facilities and the services owned by them, based on the questionnaire
prepared and distributed beforehand. We also discussed with them about the possibility ofproviding their facilities and services to other ASEAN countries under “ASEAN Energy
Management System”.
The results of discussion in Malaysia show the following.
Namely, Ptm has been providing various services using the outsourcing method, as the actual
implementation organization for energy conservation under the government. CETREE was
II-12

being managed with a fund from Europe in the past, but is now working on education,
training on energy conservation and renewable energy, carrying out their responsibilities
under the Ministry of Education and USM. Especially, CETREE said that they would be able
to offer integrated services which include energy audits, training, education, and information
services, etc. Partly because they are situated on the university campus where all the facilities
for lectures and accommodation are equipped with. It will probably be able to fully utilize
these existing facilities. They are also fully equipped with measurement hardware, and seemto have sufficient capacity to actively work as trainers or as energy auditors.
Both Ptm and CETREE have expectations for the future of the ASEAN Energy Management
System. Especially, CETREE showed a very keen and positive attitude towards theircooperation in the project.

II-2-3

The Philippines

Summary of Survey(1)

Outline of the activities
The result is that all the organizations that we visited, under different conditions foreach organization, would be able to offer their services and facilities to other ASEAN
countries as implementation organizations for the ASEAN Energy Management System.
All of them were positive about their participation in the project, and have the capacity
to implement the system, including English language ability. There was an organization
which even showed their clear intention by asking for our suggestions on how they
could participate in the project.
Mr. Zamora from ACE, as well as Mr. Domingo and Ms. Santiago from DOE (theDepartment of Energy) accompanied us on the visits to the organizations.
At each meeting with the organizations or the companies, we first explained the whole
picture of the PROMEEC Projects and the role including the objectives and specifics of
the PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project, as well as the purpose of the survey. We
then verified the answers in the questionnaire which we had distributed beforehand, anddiscussed whether the organizations had the possibility of cooperating as one of theimplementation organizations for the ASEAN Energy Management System. We also
discussed the conditions for the cooperation.
In the Philippines, ENMAP (the Energy Management Association of the Philippines)
prepared their answers to the questionnaire beforehand, but other organizations could
not, and so we asked them to send their answers for confirmation to us as soon as
possible.

II-13

(2)

Survey schedule and main interviewees
Date
September 11

Organization visited
Arrive at Manila
Department of Energy(DOE)
Energy Research Testing Labo.

September 12

September 13

September 14

3.1

Main interviewees of the organization
Mr. Jesus C. Anunciasion
Mr. Isagani C. Soriano (Supervising
Science Research Specialist, Appliance
Testing Section)

Dr. Alice B. Herrera (President)
ENMAP
DOST, Philippine Council for Industry Mr. Nonilo A. Pena (Senior Scienceand Energy Research and Development Research Specialist, Energy Utility(PICIERD)
Systems & Technology Development
Division)
Institute of Integrated Electrical
Mr. Virgilio C. Flordeliza (National
President)
Engineers （IIEE）
Leave Manila

Organizations visited for discussion and survey

3.1-1 Department of Energy (DOE)[Interviewees]
Mr. Jesus C. Anunciation (Chief, Energy Efficiency and Conservation (EE&C) Division)
Mr. Malon Romulo U. Domingo (Senior Science Research Specialist, EE&C Division)
Ms. Helen B. Arias (Chief, Consumer Welfare and Promotion office9
Ms. Jocelyn B. Santiago (Senior Science Research Specialist, EE&C Division)
Ms. Vilma R. Hernandez (Senior Science Research Specialist, EE&C Division)
Name unknown (We could not confirm the name.) (Director, Energy Research and Testing
Laboratory)
We also interviewed five other concerned staffs from the energy audit team, the training teamand the Energy Planning Division(1)

Outline of the organization
The department is in charge of political measures and legislation related to energy in thePhilippines. In relation to energy conservation, they are designated under the law as thedepartment which would develop and enforce the country’s political measures andlegislation. Presently, the Energy Conservation Act drafted by DOE is still pending after
being delivered to the Congress for legislation.
Inside the department, they have a team which implements energy audits and training, atesting laboratory for labeling, and a team which is in charge of campaigns, events andeducation. The energy audit team is implementing audits of buildings and factories
using twenty-five engineers, and they have instrument for energy audit including a bus
for conducting energy audits. They have more than twenty years of experience in
implementing around forty energy audits per year, with a standard five day on-sitemeasuring investigation in each energy audit. Therefore, they said that each engineer
had more than ten years of experience in this area. These engineers majored in not only
II-14

science and technology but also economics and finance majors at universities.
They also conduct some twenty training courses per year by lecturers who are mostly
the same people who implement the energy audits together with some other visiting
lecturers. The main programs cover energy audits, energy management and energy
conservation technology, as their key contents. As far as training facilities inside DOE,
they have lecture rooms. The training for operating equipment is also partly possible,
using boilers, lighting facilities and air-conditioning facilities etc. However, they do notpossess accommodation facilities, so they rent hotels during the training.
On the other hand, the Energy Research and Testing Laboratory is implementing not
only evaluation testing for labeling, but also conducting the calibration of
instrumentation. (For details, please refer to section of 3.1-2 below.)
Besides, sixteen staffs are engaged in public relations and awareness activities such as
education and events.
(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
System
DOE said that they could provide the other ASEAN countries with energy audits
and training services. We asked whether or not they might need complicatedapproval procedures, if DOE as a government department were to carry out
cooperation with foreign countries, using their personnel and other resources. Their
understanding was that they could implement such cooperation under the ASEAN
energy cooperation scheme of AMEM (ASEAN Ministers on Energy Meeting).
Therefore, they think that they could implement the project under the conditions
that they could collect the fee of the energy audits and training from the clients, andimprove their existing measurement hardware. We expect that they have a highpossibility of becoming an implementation organization, because they are alreadyactually implementing energy audits and training with experts who have longexperience, and they have the full equipment required.
We also explained and exchanged ideas with the focal points and interested peopleon our proposal for the award system of best practices in energy management for
major industries and buildings, as we did in the other countries.
Because of the limited time, we asked them to send us their comments and opinions
on the details, at a later date.
(b) Situation of the existing resources/infrastructure
During the past twenty-five years, they have been implementing forty energy audits
per year in industrial sectors such as cement, food products and steel, as well as in
hospitals and office buildings. They have also been implementing twenty-four
seminars and training sessions per year on average, including on individual energy
conservation technologies such as energy management, advanced efficiency andtechnology, and boilers.
II-15

They possess all the facilities and instruments, but they hire commercial hotels forthe accommodation of the trainees.
3.1-2 Energy Research and Testing Laboratory[Interviewees]
Mr. Isagani C. Soriano (Supervising Science Research Specialist, Appliance Testing Section)
One other member(1)

Outline of the organization
To implement the labeling system in the Philippines, the laboratory functions as anorganization which measures energy performance (efficiency) of products subject tolabeling, such as refrigerators, air-conditioners and light fittings, and then they certify
them. The laboratory is located in Quezon City far away from the DOE. They set up thecriteria for the measurement and evaluation, certify the products in accordance with
their criteria, and issue the labels. They set up the criteria based on the Philippine(industrial) standards and they apply international standards such as ISO (International
Organization for Standardization) and NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers
Association) for the work which the Philippine standards are not sufficient. Actual
certification is carried out when the laboratory receives appliances from the
manufacturers or the importers. The testing devices are mainly handmade, but some ofthe equipment such as an illumination testing device was imported from Germany etc.
They also calibrate sensors. The calibration apparatus that we saw during our visit to thelaboratory is for calibrating sensors measuring current, voltage and power, as well as
thermometers and pressure gauges. They mainly use imported calibration apparatus,
such as products from Yokogawa Electric Corporation of Japan, but they are also using
some obsolete instruments.

(2)

Results of the survey and discussion
We visited this organization based on a recommendation from the DOE. The labelingsystem is another cooperation area under ASEAN Energy Cooperation implemented by
ASEAN, so it is not irrelevant for our project. However, should ASEAN utilize thisorganization under the ASEAN labeling, the future role of this laboratory will bedecided according to the ASEAN policy.
In terms of the possible future role of this laboratory in the PROMEEC (Energy
Management) project, we may look into the possibility that this organization functions
as an organization which calibrates the instruments for energy audits though theirfacilities at the moment do not seem to be fully equipped.

3.1-3 Energy Management Association of the Philippines (ENMAP)[Interviewees]
Dr. Alice B. Herrera (President)
Mr. Raymond A. Marquez (Director, Technical Services)
II-16

(1)

Outline of the organization
This organization carries out energy audits and training for energy management under
the Department of Science and Technology (DOST). The President of the organizationis also a member of the Industrial Technology Development Institute (ITDI) of DOST.
In reality, the organization has only two permanent staffs including the President, andthey assign actual implementation of energy audits and training to ESCOs utilizing theirpersonnel and the facilities. Presently, fourteen members are engaged in energy audits,
and around sixteen members are engaged in training-related work. Almost 30% of themembers have more than ten years of experience. The training programs are consistedof energy management (there are two programs, namely “Basic” and “Advanced.”) andenergy audit including a method of field training at buildings and factories. They
conduct the training courses for around 150 trainees per year.

(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
System
According to the President, ENMAP could participate in the project as one of theimplementation organizations of the ASEAN Energy Management System. The
president also showed a strong desire to provide their services to the other ASEAN
countries. Although it is a NPO (non-profit organization), it is not a governmentalorganization, so that there is a possibility that the conditions could be tougher thangovernmental organizations. It would be necessary to collect the fee from theclients on a business basis. Because they are presently assigning the actual
implementation of their jobs to ESCOs, they would need to reinforce theirpersonnel and facilities to a certain level, if they expand their business in the future.
However, they have experience and network functions accumulated through many
years of implementation of energy audits and training courses, while cooperatingwith the government, ESCOs, consultants and persons from universities. Theirexperience and networking functions are noteworthy.

3.1-4 Philippine Council for Industry and Energy Research and Development(PICIERD)[Interviewees]
Mr. Nonilo A. Pena (Senior Science Research Specialist, Energy Utility Systems &Technology Development Division)
Other five members from the energy audit team of Industrial Technology Development
Institute (ITDI)(1)

Outline of the organization
The organization belongs to the Department of Science and Technology (DOST). DOST
itself is a large organization with some 5,000 officials. Their core role includes scientificand technological development, standardization, transfer of technology, provision andII-17

dissemination of technological information. They are organized by industrial
sub-sectors such as food, metals and textile, energy, transport, construction and theenvironment. More specifically, they are a group composed of organizations called as
Institutes. The sector that we visited this time was the Industrial Technology
Development Institute (ITDI). Its main role is to promote energy conservation for small
and medium-sized enterprises etc., and they have a team which implements energy
audits and training. The same members are implementing both energy audits andtraining. Mainly, they have twenty-five members based in Manila who are engaged inenergy audits and training, but they also have people in charge of the audits and training
in regional areas (we did not get the number of staffs working for EE&C in the regional
areas). As another function, they have a unit to implement engineering work and offer
such services as technological development and consulting.
In terms of energy audits, they have a full set of measuring instruments, although someof them are somewhat old-fashioned or not sufficiently maintained. They implement
energy audits as a paid service. They are also planning to introduce a bus for energy
audits. In terms of cooperation with foreign countries, they have had experience of
implementing energy audits and training in Sri Lanka in the past. Regarding the training,they have capacity for hosting up to around 100 trainees. They have large training
rooms including lecture halls inside the DOST complex. The program mainly deals withenergy audits mainly based on the field training at factories and buildings.
(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
System
It is possible for them to implement energy audits and training as animplementation organization of the ASEAN Energy Management System, and they
are eager to participate in the project. Regarding the conditions for participation,
they would need approval from the Secretary (of DOST) in order to provide foreigncountries with their services. Another condition is that the clients should pay thecost of the services.
DOST has sixteen regional offices (cf. DOE has two regional offices). They
established the Industry – Energy Consortium with concerned organizations
including universities, so that the network of regional offices can be fully utilized.
Therefore, they can utilize regional universities and implementation organizations
through this scheme. This is a strong and attractive point for them to utilize theirresources and facilities for ASEAN.
(b) Situation of the existing resources/infrastructure
Because the institute is situated in a large-scale research and development center,they have many sizes of lecture rooms and all the measuring instruments needed.
They seem to have many quality personnel as well.

3.1-5 Institute of Integrated Electrical Engineers (IIEE)[Interviewees]
II-18

Mr. Virgilio C. Flordeliza (National President)
Mr. Raymond A. Marquez (National Vice President. He is also the Director of ENMAP.)
Ms. Mary Jane T. Ramos (Executive Director)
Mr. Arthur N. Escalante (National Auditor)(1)

Outline of the organization
Under the Philippines’ law, electricians who are engaged in electrical enterprises have tobelong to accredited professional organizations (APOs). IIEE is the only APO. This
thirty years old organization is certified ISO9000:2000.
They have 31,000 members in branches called Chapters in regional areas. They havefourteen committees working on putting together information on electrical-related
standards and various electrical technologies, as well as information on state-of-the-art
technology, to distribute to the members (including through their website). They also
implement training for the members. University students belonged to faculties ofelectrical engineering are also obligated to become members of this organization, andthey receive practical training here.
In recent years, promotion of energy conservation has become an important theme in theareas that they are working on, and so they are cooperating on this issue with the DOE
etc.

(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
SystemThe team visited IIEE, because ENMAP visited on September 12th introduced theteam to this organization. The reason that we were introduced to them was that they
were well equipped with lecture rooms etc. for training.
Although we were only planning to look at the facilities, they also showed strong
interest in our project. The President of IIEE understood the concept and goals of
the ASEAN Energy Management System, and showed his strong desire toparticipate in the scheme as one of the implementation organizations offering
training and information services. They emphasized that their activities on energy
conservation were increasing and they are accumulating experience in this area,
although their main activities are focused on the area of electricity.
Similarly to PICIERD of ITDI, it is valuable that they have a strong network ofelectricians in the country. This network could be a very good access route toindividuals and companies. The President was probably considering the provisionof training services when he expressed his intention to participate in the project,
and we are also hoping for such a contribution from them. However, after learning
about their organization, we had the idea that they could participate with a team ofelectrical experts and advisors.
They were also very interested in the activities of ECCJ, and asked us to participate
II-19

in their seminar or forum and make a presentation about energy conservation. We
asked them to go through the procedure and send us a more concrete request to
METI through the Philippine government (DOE or DOST).
(b) Situation of existing resources/infrastructure
Their facilities are small but they have a four-story building where are a library andlecture rooms. They also have a practical training room, where trainees can practicecontrolling the operation of a motor using a control panel for training. In this way,
they can practice electrical control using sequencers etc. They explained that thetraining facilities were donated by Rockwell Allen-Bradley of the United States.
3.2

Results of the discussion and survey

The ECCJ-ASEAN team visited the existing implementation organizations in each country
and investigated the facilities and the services owned by them, based on the questionnaire
prepared and distributed beforehand. We also discussed with them about the possibility ofproviding their facilities and services to other ASEAN countries under “ASEAN Energy
Management System”.
The results of discussions in the Philippines show as follows.
DOE and the Philippine Council for Industry and Energy Research and Development(PICIERD) are government agencies, which have been working on various services on energy
conservation. They have accumulated abundant experience. PICIERD and DOE said that they
could provide integrated services such as energy audits, training and education. PICIERD,
partly because it is located in the complex of the integrated development institute, is fully
equipped with facilities for lectures and training. It is likely that they can fully utilize these
existing facilities. They also have full sets of measuring instruments, and they seem to havethe capacity to provide trainers and energy auditors. On the other hand, ENMAP and IIEE,
which are private organizations, are working on energy conservation even moreenthusiastically than the government organizations. They strongly agreed with, support ourplan and promised their future cooperation. Each implementation organization we visited has
differences in the degree of its present capacity in terms of personnel, facilities and equipment.
However, all four organizations have great expectations for the ASEAN Energy Management
System which we proposed, and they have expressed strong interest in their participation in
the system.

II-20

II-2-4

Vietnam

Summary of Survey(1)

Outline of the activities
In Vietnam, the ECCJ-ASEAN team visited the Ministry of Industry (hereinafter called
MOI) and the Institute of Energy (hereinafter called IE) on October 20th. Then, we
moved to Ho Chi Minh City and visited the Energy Conservation Center of Ho Chi
Minh City (hereinafter called ECC-HCMC) and the ENERTEAM Energy Conservation
Research and Development Center (hereinafter called ENERTEAM) on October 21st.
For ENERTEAM, the focal point recommended us to visit and make discussion withthem. Therefore, an arrangement was made at short notice after we entered the country.
At MOI, the team explained and consulted with the focal points, on the proposal for the
implementation plan for the award system of best practices in energy management,
which ECCJ had prepared. The team also visited to the above three implementation
organizations for survey and discussion on the possibility of providing the other
ASEAN countries with their existing functions and services under the “ASEAN Energy
Management System” to be shared among the ASEAN countries in the future. The teamalso discussed the conditions for their cooperation, as well as ideas for operational
methods.
Regarding the questionnaire sent to them beforehand for survey and discussion, ECCJ
received the answers before the ECCJ team left Japan except from ENERTEAM
because they were added onto the list of visits at short notice in Vietnam. Although weonly had a short period of time for the visit to Vietnam and there were long distances
between the organizations that we visited, we were able to complete the activities inVietnam without any trouble, thanks to the good arrangement, preparation and smooth
hosting by these organizations through the focal point.
In general, there are some aspects of the present capacity of the organizations that are
not yet sufficient. However, they have a high level of motivation to learn from moreadvanced parties and to make self-help efforts to master what they learn. They also havestrong enthusiasm for the future development of their own organizations. We felt that
there were many individual people of high ability. Especially, ECC-HCMC has aninteresting project management policy and an interesting perspective about the future.
They also have recent experience and existing personnel. All these are good resources
for their future operation. Therefore, ECC-HCMC is a very attractive and capableorganization, in terms of being a potential implementation organization under the
ASEAN Energy Management System. (For the actual cooperation, it will be necessary
to discuss further some of the conditions.)
As a whole, those organizations were very positive about their participation andcooperation in the ASEAN Energy Management System. Among these organizations,
there was strong enthusiasm to dramatically improve the infrastructure of energy
management system in the country, by actively participating in the ASEAN activities as
well.

II-21

(2)

Survey schedule and main interviewees
Date
October 19

Organization visited
Arrive at Hanoi
Ministry of industry (MOI)

Main interviewees of the organization
Mr. Le Tuan Phong (Official on Energy
and Environment, Technology andProduct Quality
Management Department)

October 20
Institute of Energy（IE）

October 21
October 22

4.1

Mr. Tran Minh Khoa (Deputy Head ofEnergy Economics, Demand Forecastand Management Dept.)

Moved to Ho Chi Minh City
Energy Conservation Center in Ho Chi Mr. Huynh Kim Tuoc (Director)
Minh City(ECC-HCMC)
Mr. Nguyen Tran The (Director)
EnerTeam
Holiday
Leave Ho Chi Minh City

Organizations visited for discussion and survey

4.1-1 MOI
[Interviewees]
Mr. Le Tuan Phong (Official on Energy and Environment, Technology and ProductQualityManagement Department)
Mr. Ngo Huy Toan (Energy expert, Department of International Cooperation)
Mr. Tran Viet Hoa (Hydropower Engineer, Department of Science and Technology)(1)Outline of the organization
Since the Decree on Energy Conservation (hereinafter referred to as “EC Decree”)
entered into force on September 13th 2003, MOI has issued the first circular (guidelines)
mainly on designated energy management factories and energy managers in July 2004
and has been preparing for an additional circulars on the coordination with otherministries and agencies, supporting systems, implementation organizations and labelingetc. At the same time, almost all the staffs of MOI are holding seminars on themethodology of enforcement in various regions in the country, including lectures on thecontents of the EC Decree and the circular. With this background, MOI currently suffersfrom a lack of staff who can draw up the circulars and hold seminars. They are hopingthat they can receive support from Japan and other countries in this respect. For
example, although they have thirty industrial sectors, they have only five staff to do thework, in comparison with Thailand which has fifty staff for the equivalent work. They
would also like to learn about the systems of Japan and Thailand in the future,especially on enforcement of the law and the designing of implementation organizations
equivalent to ECCJ. MOI is considering would like to forward a request for support toJapan as well, which would include support for the above activities.
The main work related to the EC Decree is standardization, including setting up thejudgment criteria and labeling. Under the Vietnam Energy Conservation Program
II-22

(VECP), energy conservation for approximately 120,000 small and medium-sizedenterprises is also being promoted in cooperation with MOI.
While many ministries and agencies are involved in this program, the coordination
between the ministries is not functioning well. Small and medium-sized enterprises aresupervised by local governments at the prefecture level, and there is a plan presently
being advanced to establish ten ECCs (energy conservation centers) in different regionsof the country for the purpose of implementation of training and energy audits. The fundfor EE&C (energy efficiency and conservation) activities is absolutely lacking, which is
a common problem throughout ASEAN countries. MOI said that they would like toproceed with the activities, looking to Thailand in the future.
Awareness of the public on the importance of energy conservation is weak in general,
which is observed among the top managements of companies and SMEs (small andmedium-sized enterprises). This is because of cheap energy prices due to government
subsidies, which is a barrier for promoting EE&C activities. On the other hand, there are
no government subsidies for purchasing energy-efficient equipment, and this is why thepurchase of this equipment has not been promoted.
(2)

Results of the survey and discussion
The team explained the purpose of the discussion and survey in Vietnam at this time,and confirmed the schedule. Then, the team explained, discussed and exchanged ideas
on our proposal for the implementation plan of the award system of best practices in
ASEAN energy management. There was a proposal from MOI to set up two runner-ups
in addition to one winner in each sector for industries and buildings, which makes six
awards all together. The discussion was made together with this proposal from Vietnam.
We also exchanged ideas on the evaluation criteria. We confirmed that they would
continue to contact us by e-mail if they had any more opinions, suggestions or requests.
MOI had a lot of opinions on the proposed system. As the ministry responsible for
enforcement of the EC Decree, MOI has had to establish and operate the guideline andinstitution for energy management including their energy manager system as early as
possible since the EC Decree entered into force in September 2003. This situation may
be a background of their various opinions.
According to the focal points, MOI has already put forward a proposal to set up
implementation organizations to certify the qualifications of energy managers etc.
However, they have not been able to gain approval from the Ministry of Finance and thePrime Minister because of financial problems etc. At the same time, they see the actual
progress in PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project and AEMAS seemed to be
developing faster in ASEAN. They would consider a more realistic way of establishing
implementation organizations while keeping an eye on these developments.

4.1-2 Institute of Energy (“IE”)[Interviewees]
Mr. Tran Minh Khoa (Deputy Head of Energy Economics, Demand Forecast andManagement Dept.) and another two members
II-23

(1)

Outline of the organization
This government organization was established by MOI as a research and planninginstitute for energy in 1989. Their role is essentially to advise the government on
national strategy and political measures on energy and electric power development andto draw up a master plan for electric power development. They also carry out feasibility
studies on projects for power generation and transmission and work on technologicaldevelopment in the energy sector including renewable / alternative energy development
and energy conservation. They are also in charge of international cooperation in theenergy sector including electric power. The 175 staffs are implementing a wide-range ofactivities in the energy sector. Among staffs, eight staffs are working on energy audits
and training. These specific activities related to energy conservation have been
implemented as a part of the DSM programs which are led by MOI using GEF (Global
Environment Facility) fund. Their technology has partly been built up through theinternational cooperation projects.

(2) Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
System
IE wants to contribute to the ASEAN Energy Management System throughproviding energy audit (especially in the industry sector) and training services.
According to them, although they are a government organization, they are an
independent institute hence they are able to participate in this ASEAN project by
their own management decision.
Behind their enthusiasm, there seems their expectation that IE could improve theirown capacity through the international cooperation because of their pastexperiences.
(b) Situation of the existing resources/infrastructure
In terms of facilities, they only own instruments for energy audits and a training
room possible to accommodate around fifteen people. They would need to improvethese facilities and personnel if they are to actually participate in the project. The
existing textbooks written in Vietnamese will also have to be translated into English
etc. However, they are very enthusiastic to cooperate in the project. In terms of theircapacity, they have built a model plant of a large-scale hydroelectric power station
inside their facility, and are testing its various technical aspects. They have also
constructed an experimental facility for biomass energy development. Therefore,
they have potential human resources and capacity in facility to expand theiroperation under the conditions that the management policy and financial resources
are in place.
4.1-3 Energy Conservation Center of Ho Chi Minh City (“ECC-HCMC”)[Interviewees]

II-24

Mr. Huynh Kim Tuoc (Director)
Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc Tho (Manager (Training), Technical - R&D Division)
Mr. Truong Quang Vu (Information - Marketing Division)
Three other members(1)

Outline of the organization
The organization was established in 2002 by the People’s Committee of Ho Chi Minh
City and is presently managed under the supervision of the Department of Science andTechnology (DOST) of Ho Chi Minh City. Their business covers a wide-range ofactivities on energy including not only energy conservation but also renewable energy.
Therefore, they are conducting energy audits and training, providing information
services and working on ESCO-like projects including a consulting service for building
design, engineering services and equipment supply on a project basis, and so on. They
also implement projects related to cleaner production, as well as CDM (clean
development mechanism) projects in which Japanese companies (such as Tohoku
Electric Power Co., Inc) are the partners. The area of their activities is not limited only
to inside Ho Chi Minh City, in fact expanding to the neighboring districts as well.

(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
SystemThey also expressed a strong desire and enthusiasm to contribute to the ASEAN
Energy Management System through providing their services for energy audits(especially in the industry sector), training and information provision. Since they
are practically implementing their activities independently, they could implement
projects under their management without any approval from the government. They
also have highly flexible ideas on projects, and it is noteworthy that they are
considering spinning off the ESCO business in the future, for example. In addition,
they uniquely established a database for the industrial sector, based on the results ofthe energy audits that they implemented for more than 180 companies from various
areas. They have accumulated more than 30,000 pieces of data on the energy
consumption and production of companies. They are also producing and working to
distribute some material like a technical directory for the dissemination oftechnology. These achievements are very attractive from a technical point of view.
At first, the team explained what PROMEEC has implemented and achieved in thepast and the expected future development. They commented that these activities
were exactly the same as what ECC-HCMC is implementing. On the operational
aspects, their clients bear half of the cost (and the other half is covered bygovernment subsidy) for energy audits. For training, they pay US$ 1,000 for theoutside lecturer for the two days of program on a commercial basis. In this way,
they are developing their business while expanding the number of staffs andfacilities. Therefore, they are well managing the ECC-HCMC meeting the needs fortheir projects and marketing requirements. They seem to have good management
know-how and showed a very strong interest in participating in the ASEAN Energy
Management System from a business point of view, which was very impressive.
(b) Situation of the existing resources/infrastructure
II-25

The total number of staff is 244, of which thirty are engineers. Twenty of thoseengineers work on energy audits and training. Besides, there were twenty more
external personnel including lecturers cooperating for the training.
ECC-HCMC seems to have built their capacity within a short period. In terms of
their achievements, they implement almost 100 energy audits per year mainly in theindustrial sector and also conducted forty to forty-five training courses per year
(one course normally lasts for two days). It is remarkable that they have completed
the training for 500 trainees. As of the visiting date, they have already implemented
training for 400 trainees in 2005. In terms of facilities, ECC-HCMC equip with
instruments and equipment for energy audits including a bus for the audits. For the
training, they are applying a rational method. Namely, they conduct the training at
the clients’ factories etc. using the clients’ meeting facilities. Therefore, in
ECC-HCMC, there are only have two training rooms which accommodate fifteen
people each and one training room for fifty people.
4.1-4 ENERTEAM Energy(“ENERTEAM”)

Conservation

ResearchandDevelopment

Center[Interviewees]
Mr. Nguyen Tran The (Director)
Mr. Nguyen Quoc Bao (Vice Director)
Mr. Hoang Viet (Vice Director)
Mr. Huynh Van Nam(1)

Outline of the organization
The organization was established in 1995 with the assistance of the French TRANS
ENERG, and was certified as an NGO/NPO (non-governmental organization/non-profit
organization) on energy in 2000. According to them, they are an ESCO. It is a small
company with twelve staff, ten of which are engineers who are engaged in energy audits,
training, engineering and consulting services for the projects. They also have aroundtwenty external supporters/collaborators. As for the facilities, they just have an officeand some sets of energy audit instruments. This company is also implementing a wide
range of projects not only on the energy area such as energy conservation and renewableenergy but also on the environmental protection including cleaner production, though
they have only a small number of staffs. They are operating projects which are related tocooperation with EU especially from France such as COGEN. In relation to energy
conservation, they are implementing projects which are in line with the DSM program
mainly led by MOI. Their training programs consist of mainly lectures with only fivecourses being held per year.

II-26

(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
SystemFor the ASEAN Energy Management System, they would have the capacity toparticipate in the service of energy audits and training and would strongly like toparticipate in the system.
Because this is a private organization, they would need to collect fees from theclients while they do not need to go through complicated procedures to participate
in the project.
(b) Situation of the existing resources/infrastructure
It is our observation that they would need to improve the present personnel power
and facilities before they participate in the ASEAN Energy Management System.
However, financial arrangement for the initial investment might be difficult forthem because the organization is an independent and small private company.

4.2

Results of the discussion and survey

The ECCJ-ASEAN team visited the existing implementation organizations in each country
and investigated the facilities and the services owned by them, based on the questionnaire
prepared and distributed beforehand. We also discussed with them about the possibility ofproviding their facilities and services to other ASEAN countries under “ASEAN Energy
Management System”.
The results of discussion in Vietnam are as follows.
All the three implementation organizations visited in Vietnam understood the ASEAN Energy
Management System and actively offered us their cooperation. Especially, ECC-HCMC had
made many self-help efforts and has great potentiality for future development, though it wasestablished only recently. Moreover, there were many personnel who had great individual
abilities. They have been working for various services in energy conservation andaccumulated abundant achievements. They could provide integrated services such as energy
audits, training and education. They have full sets of measuring instruments and seem to havethe capacity to be good trainers or energy auditors. ECC-HCMC is an attractive organizationin terms of their project management policy, recent achievements and the existing
management resources.
It is true that those implementation organizations have differences in the present capacities of
personnel or facilities and equipment. However, all the organizations have great expectations
for the ASEAN Energy Management System which we proposed and expressed strong
interest in their participation in the activities under the ASEAN Energy Management System.

II-27

II-2-5

ThailandSummary of Survey(1)

Outline of the activities
Although October 24th was a compensatory holiday for Chulalongkorn Day in Thailand,
the ECCJ-ASEAN team reviewed and discussed the activities actually implemented andthe plan of activities afterward for the PROMEEC projects, together with ED (theExecutive Director) and the Project Coordinator of ACE.
In the morning on 25th, the team visited DEDE (the Department of Alternative Energy
Development and Efficiency) and made explanation and discussion on the actual results
and the present situations of the PROMEEC projects. Moreover the team explained anddiscussed with the focal points about the proposal for the implementation plan of theaward system of best practices in energy management which ECCJ had prepared
beforehand.
In the afternoon, the team visited the Training Division of DEDE and its mini plant with
ED of ACE. We discussed the possibility they could provide the ASEAN Energy
Management System with the services and functions presently owned by them. Then,
we had a tour to look at the mini plant. (Mr. Yoshida left for Manila to attend
intergovernmental policy dialogue by the afternoon flight.)
On 26th, the team invited four consultant firms to DEDE and discussed with them
together with the focal points of Thailand, as to whether they could offer their facilities
and services for the ASEAN Energy Management System.
Although Thailand is the leading country in ASEAN in terms of energy management,
the consultant firms explained us their experiences in difficulties, problems and barriers
when offering consulting services in Thailand.
Although it was a short visit, we were able to complete the survey without any trouble,
thanks to the smooth hosting and careful preparation by the focal point and theconcerned parties.

(2)

Survey schedule and main interviewees
Date
October 23
October 24
October 25
October 26
October 27

5.1

Organization visited
Arrive at Bangkok
Internal Meeting
DEDE
Training Division (DEDE)
Joint Meeting (DEDE)
Continue staying (Another Project)

Organizations visited for discussion and survey

5.1-1 Consultation with DEDE
II-28

Main interviewees of the organization
Dr. Weerawat and others
Dr. Prasert
Mr. Manaswee and others
Mr. Francis R. H. Chinand others

[Interviewees]
Dr.Prasert Sinsukaprasert (DEDE)
Mr.Komol Buaket (DEDE)
Mr. Sarat (DEDE)(1)

Results of the survey and discussion
First, the team explained the purpose of the discussion and the survey in Thailand andconfirmed the schedule. The team then explained, discussed and exchanged ideas on the
proposed implementation plan for the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices inEnergy Management. Regarding the evaluation criteria, the focal point of DEDE
suggested that not only the achieved energy performance, but also the process ofimprovement activities and the methods of data collection (i.e. monitoring) etc. forachieving energy conservation should be included in the criteria. They also suggested
that not only academics but also experienced practical people from business areas
should be added to the member of the judging committee. They also made somesuggestions about the frequency of the committee meetings. The team proposed tofurther discuss these issues in the Post Workshop, contacting each other by e-mail ifthey had any further more opinions, suggestions or requests.

5.1-2 Training Division of DEDE
[Interviewees]
Mr. Manaswee Hakeme (Training Division, DEDE) and another four members of Training
Division
Mr. Komol Buaket (DEDE)
Mr. Salat (DEDE)(1)Outline of the organization
The Training Division was established in 1992 under the present DEDE and is engaged
in training for PRE (Person Responsible for Energy) using the mini plant. They have
many training courses varying from courses on fundamentals of energy conservation tocourses on instruments and equipment for energy conservation. Although they are solely
a governmental organization, they could offer trainers to the ASEAN project in the
future under the conditions that they should consult with the DEDE of the superior
organization. In terms of facilities, they own the mini plant equipped with training
rooms and full sets of simulation equipment and instruments for energy audit. Probably,
the mini plant is the most equipped facilities in the ASEAN countries. However, their
existing textbooks are written in Thai and should be translated into English. In this case,the permission DEDE will be required to use the copyright of these textbooks. As they
have recently conducted training courses for the neighboring countries with use of theirfacilities for training, they could utilize their facilities for the ASEAN training as long as
the cost of hosting the trainees is provided. The conditions should be consulted further
with the DEDE. The Training Division employs forty staffs, among which twenty could
implement training and energy audits. In addition, they assign consultant firms for
conducting the normal training courses. In this case, the Training Division functions as aII-29

coordinator. They recently set up simulators for training of energy conservation in
hospitals, hotels, textile factories, food factories, etc., in addition to the training by
utilizing the mini plant.
(2)

Results of the survey and discussion(a) Possible contributions of the organization to the ASEAN Energy Management
System
According to the Training Division, they have the capacity to participate in the
program of the ASEAN Energy Management System through providing energy
audit and training services. They actually have a strong desire to participate in it.
The organization is a 100% governmental organization and they need approval
from DEDE of the superior organization for them to participate in ASEAN projects.
(b) Situation of the existing resources/infrastructure
They have the most equipped facilities of all the ASEAN countries, including
training facilities such as a mini plant and measuring instruments. The personnel
have a lot of experience in training though they do not seem to have much
experience in energy audits.

5.1-3 Joint meeting with consultant firms[Interviewees]
Dr. Prasert Sinsukaprasert (DEDE)
Mr. Komol Buaket (DEDE)
Interviewees from consultant firms
Mr. Francis K. H.Chen (Managing Director, EEC ENERGETICS )Mr. Pieree Cazelles (Project Manager, EEC ENERGETICS)
Mr. Nutdhapun Ngernbunmroog (Manager/Energy Dept. EEC-CM、-EEC Group)
Dr. Somchai Dechapanichkul (Managing Director, UEE Technology Ltd.)Mr. Chartdanai Chartpolrak (Executive Managing Director, Able Consultant Co. Ltd)Mr. Chirasak Boonrowd (Deputy Executive Director, ECCT)(1)

Results of the discussion
Firstly, the team explained the background of the PROMEEC project as well as the
purpose of the present survey. Then, the attendees at the meeting stated various opinions
and comments. As a whole, their attitude toward cooperation with the ASEAN Energy
Management System was very positive, regardless of their very official statements infront of other rival companies in the same business field. Anyway, they showed a strong
desire and enthusiasm to contribute to the ASEAN Energy Management System throughproviding energy audits, training and information services. On the practical side, they
are private companies and able to operate projects without any approval from thegovernment because they independently operate their businesses. They also have a lotof flexibility in their ideas about the operation.
EEC ENERGETICS and UEE Technology are working in different fields in ASEAN,
II-30

and they pointed out the following common problems observed in ASEAN.
- There is a big gap between ASEAN countries in the understanding of or activities forenergy management and it is important to fill these gaps. More systems for closing
the information gap should be put in place. EEC ENERGETICS also pointed out that,in the AEMAS project as well, there were differences in the degree of commitment
between the participating countries and they have experienced various problems withthe project.
- Generally, management groups in ASEAN countries are short-sighted and the energy
management and safety for a long-term are not prioritized. They would rather put
their efforts into increasing production. In many cases, the training is of an ad hoc
nature and nothing follows on from it.
- It is said that Thailand is advanced in terms of energy conservation and energy
management. However, it is only the cases of some large-scale companies andforeign-affiliated companies and is not the cases of SMEs.
- There was a case that Thai consultants were excluded in Singapore. Other
consultants did not seem to have any problems. (We could have asked about thismatter in more detail if we had an individual meeting.)- 80% of the needs for energy conservation could be covered if “e-training” etc. isavailable and local consultants are employed.
- The Energy Management Standard under development with cooperation by UEE
Technology would be established in the regulation as the national standard within
two or three months.
Partly because they have a wide range of management know-how about business in
ASEAN countries, they expect that their participation in the ASEAN Energy
Management System will create a business opportunity. Accordingly, they probably
expressed very strong enthusiasm for participation from a business point of view. We
confirmed that we would carry on contacting each other via e-mail about matters which
we could not ask about at the time, because it was not an opportunity to individually
discuss.
5.2

Results of the discussion and survey

The ECCJ-ASEAN team visited the existing implementation organizations in each country
and investigated the facilities and the services owned by them, based on the questionnaire
prepared and distributed beforehand. We also discussed with them about the possibility ofproviding their facilities and services to other ASEAN countries under “ASEAN Energy
Management System”.
The results of discussion made in Thailand are as follows.
DEDE is a governmental organization and is fully equipped with everything for nergy
conservation activities such as the mini plant with training rooms, measuring instruments andso on. Their facilities are overwhelmingly superior to all the other organizations. Although
their facilities might be perfect for conducting training courses, they might have problems
II-31

with the number and quality of staffs for energy audits in field by visiting industrial sites.
Because the meeting with consultants was a joint meeting, we have not visited eachconsultant firm to find out about their facilities and personnel. These consultant firms are
involved in energy conservation services not only in Thailand but also in ASEAN countries aspart of their business. Therefore, they expressed high expectations for the ASEAN Energy
Management System to work in the future.
Further clarification for each company will be needed. Namely, it is necessary to clarify what
are the specific services possible to provide for ASEAN clients, for example, availability ofenergy audits for both or either of factories and / or buildings. If they can energy audit forfactories, then we need to know what kind of industries they can implement the energy audits .
In case of training, they need to specify the available programs such as general course onenergy management, or technical courses including energy audits with clarification of specifictheories and technologies possible to teach, etc.
They also offered the conditions for providing their services and facilities. A condition
required by all is the finance. They would charge fees for their services. Furthermore, some
implementation organizations clarified other conditions to improve the existing personnel andfacilities, or to get approval from their superior organization such as the case of the Training
Division of DEDE.
The current capacities of these implementation organizations vary in terms of the existing
personnel, facilities and equipment. However, in actual, all the organizations have great
expectations for the ASEAN Energy Management System proposed and they expressed strong
interests in their participation in the activities under the ASEAN Energy Management System.

II-32

II-3

Results of the Discussion and Study on the Proposal for How to Utilize the
Existing Implementation Organizations in ASEAN Countries

II-3-1

Functions to Be Required for the ASEAN Energy Management System andScope of Services and Facilities for the Existing Implementation Organization to
Be Able to Provide

In the fiscal year of 2004, the basic concept of the “ASEAN Energy Management System”
was discussed and agreed by concerned persons in all the ASEAN countries. Based on theagreed concept, in this fiscal year, the required functions for the “ASEAN Energy
Management System” was discussed in the “Research Study in Japan” described in Chapter
IV. Based on the results of these discussions, it was concluded that the ASEAN Energy
Management System will be required to equip with the following basic functions.
1) Provision of information
2) Implementation of energy audits, training and education
3) Function to properly work and operate the above-mentioned services
In accordance with this conclusion, and based on the results of the investigations made in thefiscal year of 2004 on the existing implementation organizations in ASEAN countries, theteam visited the existing implementation organizations and carried out surveys anddiscussions explained in Article II – 2. The following are the points that the team verified anddiscussed.
♦ General information on the outlines and business scopes of the implementation

organizations♦ Verification of possibility / intension including conditions for the implementation

organizations to provide the ASEAN countries with their services or facilities♦ Assessment of the present capabilities of person power, equipment and facilities for energy

audit, training and education
We carried out survey through interviewing persons from the existing implementation
organizations in the above-mentioned five countries and through sending out a questionnaire
to get information from the existing implementation organizations in Singapore. As a result of
the surveys, all twenty organizations where the team conducted surveys expressed theirintention to provide the ASEAN countries with the services and facilities that they presently
own and provide. Table II-3-1 shows the service areas for these implementation organizations
to be able to and/or to intend to provide.
Table II-3-1: Service Areas Possible to Provide and Number of Implementing
Organizations
Energy Audits

Training and Education

YES
YES

YES

YES

YES
YES

Other Services(Information Service etc.)
YES

Number of Implementing
Organizations
2

YES

12

Total

2
4
20

Twelve implementation organizations, which is equivalent to 60% of the total surveyed, could
provide integrated services including energy audits, training and education and other services
II-33such as information services. Therefore, the fact shows a larger possibility that the ASEAN
countries could utilize those existing organizations. However, there is a big variance between
these implementation organizations in the present capacities of personnel, facilities andequipment. Accordingly, in reality, a smaller number of organizations would be able to meetvarious requirements from clients based on the assessment on the specific scopes of services
that they can provide. Namely, the following should be required to clarify.
1) Available scope of field for energy audit such as industry including specific industrial
sub-sectors or building or both
2) Available programs of training such as a general program on energy management and atechnical program on EC technology / its theory including practice of energy audit
When all these points are considered, the actual combination of the scope of services possible
for them to provide will be more.
The implementation organizations, moreover, proposed the conditions for providing theirservices and facilities. The most-frequently requested conditions were those from a financial
point of view. All the organizations that the survey team visited would like customers tocharge fees for their services. Also, in order to provide customers in the outside the country
with their services, some implementation organizations clarified other conditions as follows.
- Improvement of the existing personnel and facilities- Approval or agreement from their superior organizations
However, these are the expected conditions from a management point of view. Therefore,
these should not be difficult issues to realize, though better ways to meet these conditions
should be studied.

II-3-2

Proposal for Utilizing the Existing Implementation Organizations in the ASEAN
Energy Management System

As the next step, it will be required to establish a specific procedure so as to to utilize theservices that the existing implementation organizations can offer, based on the actual survey
and discussion made in the fiscal year of 2005. Although this is the key task targeted tocomplete in 2006 and 2007, one draft proposal of the basic plan was discussed in theSummary and Post Workshops with the participating focal points of the ASEAN countries in
the fiscal year of 2005. Namely, the point of the proposal is to set up a system or a function sothat the clients wishing to purchase some services / facilities can find the existingorganizations possible to meet the requirements of such clients. One of the proposed ideas
was the open tender system. In this system, the implementation organizations clarify andpublish the specific services including conditions that they can and want to provide. On theother hand, the clients also specify the services including conditions wished to purchase andinquire these implementation organizations to provide the services. The proposal also includes
the idea that the ASEAN Energy Management System would offer a platform for this tendersystem to connect a client with service providers or registered implementing organizations.
More specifically, the tendering (or meeting) site is set up on a website. The information
about the existing implementation organizations and their services possible to provide would
be made available on the website. The clients looking at the site would prepare their
specifications and the purchase conditions of the required services and directly contact andnegotiate with the possible implementation organizations. Or, the clients would upload their
specifications on the website and the implementation organizations looking at the site would
II-34

contact the potential clients to negotiate individually.
The survey was conducted on only twenty existing implementation organizations this time.
However, it will be important to add a function that the other implementation organizations
could register and upload the information of such organizations so that they could also
participate in the system.
While the proposed idea was discussed in the Summary and Post Workshops with the focal
points of the ASEAN countries in the fiscal year of 2005, they did not seem to fully
understand the proposal. Therefore, in the fiscal year of 2006, it will be necessary to develop
and discuss a more specific proposal based on the above-mentioned proposal.

II-35

III

Introduction of the Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for
Major Industries and Buildings

III-1 Summary
Aiming at widely collecting the best practices in energy management from the industry andbuilding sectors in the ASEAN countries and sharing the information among ASEAN
countries, this system was proposed in the fiscal year of 2004 and agreed in the Post
Workshop. Regarding the other award systems in ASEAN countries, the award system forenergy efficient best practice buildings has been successfully implemented since 2000.
However, the reality in many cases is that the awards have been given to buildings whichwere newly constructed with state-of-the-art designs and equipment, or to revamped buildings
which introduced energy efficient equipment. Those buildings are segregated in some specificcountries like Singapore, Thailand or Malaysia, where the economy has more developed andlarge-scale investment is possible. Moreover, concerning the evaluation criteria, the ratio ofmarks allocated to energy management is small.
In addition, there is a plan to introduce the similar kind of award system for the industrial
sector in ASEAN. However, the actual realization seems to require a long time.
On the other hand, it has been five years since the transfer of technology started through the
PROMEEC projects for major industries and buildings in which activities such as training
through OJT basis of energy audits has been carried out.
In this activity, the Japanese experts tried to make recommendation on improvement in energy
management such as operation and maintenance improvement with no or little cost becausesuch kind of improvement can be easily realized. As a result, they could enjoy a relatively
large benefit. Based on the actual experience, they have learned that the improvement inenergy management is very effective for energy conservation and it is essential to enhancetheir capability in order to introduce a high-level of technology and achieve its maximized
performance.
Also through the actual activity, it is observed that some factories and buildings in the fairly
developed ASEAN countries own good energy management in place applying some advanced
hardware, which we could have expected. However, at the same time, we also found someexamples in the less developed countries, where energy management was well in place andthe people involved have made innovative improvements in some factories and buildings.
As a result of these activities, we recognized as follows. Namely, it would be very importantand effective to establish the system for energy management for factories and buildings forpromoting energy conservation based on the day-to-day improvements and it would be very
valuable to share and publicize the information about successful cases of energy management
which were actually implemented in the ASEAN countries. Therefore, this award system was
proposed and agreed, as a realistic method of collecting best practices in energy management
for major industries and buildings. The award system was named as the “ASEAN Award
System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Major Industries and Buildings.”
In fiscal year 2005, the basic plan for the award system in energy management was proposedby ECCJ, was discussed with the focal points of the five countries that were visited for thesurvey on the existing implementation organizations, and was amended reflecting theoutcomes of these discussions. The amended basic plan was sent to all the focal points of theten ASEAN countries for reviewing beforehand and was discussed and agreed in theSummary and Post Workshops held in January 2006. Finally, we were able to start selecting
III-1

the members of the judging committee from February 2006 and it can be expected to launch
the full-swing operation of the system from May 2006, as targeted.
III-2 Basic Plan for the Award System Proposed by the Japanese Side and Results of
Discussion with the Focal Points
III-2-1 Outline of the Plan Proposed by the Japanese Side and Discussion with the
Focal Points
ECCJ proposed the basic plan of the award system for energy management including thefuture operation plan of the system. The proposed plan is based on the award system of bestpractices in energy conservation realized in Japan
The proposed basic plan consists of the following. Verification and discussions with the focal
points were carried out on these points.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

PurposeTargets
Outline of the award system and important evaluation items
Implemented activities and yearly time schedule (including the preparation for
implementation)
Members of the judging committee
Plan of related activities- Preparation for the application form
- Conditions for application- Major evaluation items in the industry and building sectors

This award system has the following features.
♦ The applicants are invited from the both industry and building sectors. And the applied

cases shall be of cases succeeded in improvement with no / low cost in energy
management.
♦ Regarding the members of the judging committee, the persons with abundant experience in

the industrial sector should be prioritized and the focal points are advised to nominate
applicants who actually practiced energy management in factories or buildings. One
member of the judging committee will be selected from each country.
♦ One winner and one runner-up for each sector (major industries or buildings) will bechosen hence four cases will be awarded for the industry and building sectors. Eachcountry can apply two cases for the award system and these awardees will be selectedamong a maximum of twenty cases of which information including that of awardees will
be publicized every year.
III-2-2 Results of the Discussion during the Visits to ASEAN Countries and theAmended Plan
In the discussions made with the focal points in each country, the focal points provided many
comments on the evaluation criteria, the selection of members of the judging committee andso on. However, these comments were not critical to dramatically change the proposed planand minor changes in some parts were made in amended plan. The amended plan was
III-2

circulated to the focal points for their final reviews and comments.
Appendix III-2-2-1 shows the amended basic plan finalized.

III-3 Results of Discussion on the Proposed Basic Plan of the Award System and the
Policy of Implementation in the FutureIII-3-1 Final Basic Plan and the Policy of Implementation
The finalized basic plan was explained, confirmed and finally agreed by the focal points of
the ASEAN countries in the Summary and Post Workshops on January 27th,2006. The
finalized basic plan is shown in Appendix III-2-2-1.
After the basic plan was agreed, ECCJ immediately commenced the selection process for the
judging committee members targeting to call the first application in May 2006. In theSummary and Post Workshops, accordingly, the focal points of the ASEAN countries wererequested to immediately start selecting their nominees. Also, ECCJ prepared the preliminary
criteria to qualify the nominees for the judging committee members and the application form
to submit the application of nominees. In practice, since it was predicted that it would take along time to complete all the nominations, it was decided to start the selection once among thenominees applied by some countries at certain timing.
The first work to be done is to prepare the application form for the award system, whichshould be completed by April 2006. Therefore, the first screening of the nominees of the
judging committee was made at the end of February 2006.
After then, the first “Research Forum in Japan” was held to develop the application form by
inviting the selected committee members.
After the above work is completed, all the committee members shall be selected and they willcomplete the developed application form for the award system so that the judging committee
can start inviting the first applications in May 2006.
In March 2007, the judging committee will decide which factories and buildings will receive
awards and information on all the cases submitted for the ASEAN award system will be
publicized in May 2007. The same activities will be repeated every year, thereafter.
III-3-2 Research Forum in Japan
By inviting some of the judging committee members as mentioned above, the “Research
Forum in Japan” was held on March 22nd through 24th 2006. Malaysia, the Philippines, andThailand submitted applications for the judging committee members, and two committee
members (from Malaysia and the Philippines) and two advisors (from Malaysia and Thailand)
were selected at the beginning of March 2006. ECCJ invited the four members, of which threemembers participated in the forum, hence four ASEAN members including one ACE staff incharge of the project. In the forum, the participants were expected to develop the basic
application form and to verify a further detailed plan for the future activities of the “ASEAN
Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Major Industries and Buildings.”
The program consisted of the following contents.
(1) Presentation to exchange information on the existing award systems actually realized in
III-3

the ASEAN countries(2) Presentation of the award systems in JapanThe specifics and implementation procedures of the award systems are presented,
especially the award systems for cases of best practices in energy conservation and theaward system of excellent energy management for factories.
(3) Information exchange with the members implementing award systems in Japan(4) Workshop
In the workshop, the basic application form was prepared, and the future activities plan
was verified.
Table III-3-2-1 shows the details of the program.
Situation and purpose of “Research Forum in Japan”
In accordance with the plan determined through the discussion made in the Summary and Post
Workshop held at the end of January 2006, the first application will be started to launch the“ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Major Industries andBuildings”. Before staring the first application, it is necessary to select members of the
judging committee and to develop the application form. In order to meet the plan, it wasdetermined that the “Research Forum in Japan” would be held in March 2006 for major
members of the judging committee to develop the preliminary application form to be finalized
by the end of April 2006.
In accordance with the plan, by inviting main members of the judging committee the“Research Forum in Japan” was planned and implemented for the purpose of developing thebasic application form and confirming the time schedule after the forum.
Results and achievement of “Research Forum in Japan”
In the “Research Form in Japan”, the participants developed the basic application form of the“ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Major Industries andBuildings” and revised the time schedule.
At first, through the lectures made by ECCJ experts, the participants deepened theirunderstanding of the award system realized in Japan and the basic plan of the “ASEAN Award
System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Major Industries and Buildings”. Next,
based on the knowledge, the participants made active discussion including informationexchange and Q&A.
Finally, the participants developed the basic application form and confirmed the future timeschedule, so that the purpose of the “Research Forum in Japan” was achieved. The preparedbasic application form is shown in the Appendix III-2-2-1. The basic application form
includes basic items and contents of which details will be developed in April and May 2006
reflecting comments by the focal points. The application form will be authorized and the firstcall for application will be made in the meeting of EE&C-SSN. The updated plan andschedule confirmed in the workshop session is shown in Appendix III-3-2-2.
The big achievement will drive the future development of the PROMEEC (Energy
Management) Project and the smooth implementation of the project can be expected in thenext fiscal year too.
We were able to carry out the Research Forum in Japan smoothly and achieve the aims set for
the forum.
III-4

Appendix III-2-2-1
Basic Plan of the Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management
PROMEEC (Energy Management) for 2005-2006
Proposed Basic Plan of “ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy
Management for Major Industries and Buildings”
January 27, 2006
1. Purpose
The “ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Major Industries
and Buildings” (hereinafter referred to as “Award System”) aims at the following.
(1) Providing the factories and buildings with incentives to improve their reputations ofapplicants hence improve their business(2) Collecting/Disseminating successful examples in ASEAN countries(3) Giving the winners chances for business related to energy conservation
2. Targets of the Award System
Enhanced Promotion of Energy Conservation in ASEAN by Sharing Collected/DisseminatedInformation on Best Practices in Energy Management for Major Industries and Buildings.

3. Brief Outline of Award System
Basically, the cases applied for the Award System should be practice-oriented improvementwith a large effect actually proven and with potentiality of dissemination in the ASEAN
region with no or low cost, rather than projects to introduce new equipment.
A judging committee for the Award System will be organized under the ACE and its members
will be also recommended and decided by the ASEAN members under coordination by ACE.
The judging committee evaluates all the applied cases and determines the winners.
The evaluation should be transparent, comprehensive, and understandable to meet the
purpose.
Important evaluation items are listed up as follows:-

Effect of Reduction in Energy Consumption
EconomyCreativity
Potentiality of Dissemination and Estimated EffectImpact on Environmental Protection
Overall Evaluation

III-5

4. Process of Preparation through Implementation and Yearly Schedule(1)

General Discussion and Reflection of requests/comments from each focal point• • • From September through December, 2005

(2)

Explanation/Agreement of Proposed Energy Management Awarding System• • • Summary/Post Workshop in January 2006

(3)

Recommendation of Members for Judging Committee by ASEAN• • • Mid-February 2006

(4)

Determination of the judging committee members• • • February 2006

(5)

Research forum in Japan for some of selected judging committee members• • • March 2006

(6)

Preparation of Application Form• • • April 2006

(7)

Call for First Application• • • May to July 2006

(8)

Screening in Each Country• • • August to September 2006 (if necessary)(9)

Determination of Local Candidates• • • October 2006 (if necessary)(10) Competitive Presentation by Local Candidates in Each Country• • • November to December 2006 (if necessary)(11) Decision of First Local Winners• • • December 2006

III-6

(12) Presentation by Local Winners• • • February 2007
Number of Local Winners:- Basically two (2) winners for Major Industries and Buildings in each country- Twenty (20) Final Candidates (= Two winners/country x 10 Countries)(13) Determination of Two (2) ASEAN Winners and Two (2) Runner-ups• • • March 2007
- One (1) Winner/One (1) Runner-up for Major Industries- One (1) Winner/One (1) Runner-up for Buildings.
(14) Publishing through Website of ACE & ECCJ
• • • May 2007
20 Cases of Local Winners including ASEAN Winners

III-7

5. Members of the “Judging Committee”(1)

Qualification: The members are required the following.
- Working experience for energy management in factories or buildings during over 5
years. (Engineer/Manager/Executive)- Educational background with bachelor or higher degree in science/engineering- Neutral position (governmental/public/retired person, etc.)(2) Number: 10 to 12
For Industries:

7 with background of 7 Industries(Iron/Steel/Other Metal, Cement/Ceramics, Chemical, Petro, Textile,
Pulp & Paper and Food)

For the buildings: 3 to 5
Some members may be from members of the “Board of Judges”
Basically, more members are from the industrial sectors and own abundant experienceof working for improvement in process, energy conservation with experience ofmanagement.
(3) Term: One (1) Year and Maximum Two (2) Consecutive Years for A Same Person
The term of assignment would be basically one (1) year.
(4) Recommendations of Members
Every year, all the focal points are invited to recommend candidates for the committee
members. A maximum of two (2) candidates can be recommended by each country.
(5) Chairperson of Judging Committee
The chairperson and the vice chairperson will be circulated among persons from the 10
countries in an alphabetic country order.
(6) Advisor
The judging committees will own an advising team with advisors from ECCJ and ACE.
While the advisors can provide their views and advice when required, they cannot
recommend/vote to select winners and runner-ups.

III-8

ATTACHMENT
1. Outline and History of the Proposed Award System
In the Summary/Post Workshop held in February 2005 at Singapore, the basic concept of the“ASEAN Energy Management System” including the future plan prepared by ECCJ was
discussed with the focal points. As a conclusion, the basic concept was agreed. And the future
plan includes the activity for an activity for 2005 – 2006 to study and prepare for the
introduction of the “Award System for Best Practices of Energy Management in Major
Industries and Buildings”. Moreover, in the panel discussion made during the “Research andStudy Workshop in Japan” held in July 2005, the participants also emphasized an importanceto share information among ASEAN countries, which meet the purpose of the award system.
As mentioned above, the purposes of the Award System are to promote the improvement in“Energy Management” in the industry and building sectors through disseminating awarded
and applied excellent cases. Accordingly, the selected excellent cases shall be suitable andeffective for ASEAN conditions and attractive for related stakeholders to apply. And theevaluation shall be strict, fair, transparent, comprehensive, and understandable.
2. Preparation for Application
2.1 Preparation of Application Form
The application form reflecting the evaluation items and the detailed operating procedure of
the Award System will be developed and finalized by the judging committee.
2.2 Way of Application
The applied cases will be collected by the focal point of each country and then the focal point
would screen the applied cases to choose cases submitted for competition. ACE will collect
the applied cases submitted for competition from all the ASEAN countries.
(1)

Announcement in ASEAN countries by ACE and the focal points:
The purposes and background of the awarding system will be explained for applicants at
an appropriate timing.

(2)

Application form shall be submitted to ACE through the focal point in each country.

(3)

The focal points of each country indicate and suggest to applicants on application form.

2.3 Necessary Conditions for Application(1)

In application, under the condition that the applicants shall provide information and data
possible to publish, applicants shall fulfill the stipulated application form in accordancewith the indication stated in the Item 3.

(2)

In the selection process, applicants shall correspond to questions from the judging
committee and receive the survey team of committee members and/or focal points, if
required.

III-9

(3)

Prior to submitting the application form, all the activities of the proposed cases shall becompleted and actual effects of the project shall be confirmed for an appropriate period
after the completion.

(4)

In principle, excellent cases chosen as candidates including winners will be disclosed inpublishing form or web site.

(5)

Language
Application format submitted to the committee shall be written in English.

3. Major Evaluation Items in Industry and Building Sectors
3.1 Format of Common Evaluation Criteria in Industry and Building Sectors(1)

Overview of Project
Description on Outline/Reasons of Theme Selection/Purpose and Target of Project(2) Specifics of Energy Saving Activities- Yearly Energy Consumption/Unit Energy Consumption in the past two to three years
before Improvement (Base Load)- Setting Target/Problems and Solutions- Viewpoints and Process to Study Measures for Improvement- Specific Measures and Activities for Improvement
Plan and Implementation including process, steps and time schedule for realization- Responsible Organization or Team to implement the Project(including “Small Group” etc. to develop/implement activities)(3) Actual Results- Effect of Reduction in Energy Consumption
In Comparison of Yearly Energy Consumption/Unit Energy Consumption for one
year or longer after Improvement with Base Load
- Economical Effect- Potentiality of Dissemination and Estimated Effect- Featured Efforts in Activities- Impact on Environmental Protection

III-10(4) Overall Evaluation- Assessment of Item (3) including investment for Improvements (Payout time),- Other Tangible and Intangible Effects (Increasing business efficiency, quality,
productivity, morale, better communication and pleasant workplace, etc.)- Creativity- Sustainable Activities and Implementing Organization (Organization Chart, New
Standardization, New Operation Mode, etc.)
3.2 Format of Individual Evaluation Criteria in Industry and Building Sectors
Applicants could explain the effects of the project by using their own method (using
understandable and appropriate index).
Building
1. Outline of ProjectYes

2. Expected and Actual Effects Yes- Energy Consumption*1 &*3- Economical Improvement
3. Investment Amount for Energy Yes
Conservation/Payout time
4. Top Policy and Awareness of Yes
Top Managers*4
5. Energy Management System Yes*2
6. Organization for
Yes
Implementation*5
7. Future Development
Yes*6

Industry
Yes(with Outline of Related
Process and Equipment)
Yes
*1&*3
Yes
Yes
*4
Yes(Achievement
Measures)
Yes
*5
Yes
*6

*1 Energy Consumption- Total Energy Consumption- Energy Consumption for the concerned area/process- Evaluation of Unit Energy Consumption in terms of MJ/ton and MJ/m2, etc.

III-11*2 Energy Management Systems(Hardware with Engineered Software)- Building Energy Management System (BAS)- Energy Management Monitoring System- System to Control Energy Supply/Demand (Practice)- Acquisition of ISO etc.
- Mandatory Reporting and Activities in accordance with EC law if any- Manpower in Energy Management Improvement:- Assignment of Energy Managers - Training and Education Program, etc.
- Standardization of Improvement*3 Data with Expected /Actual Effects (Energy Consumption and Economy)- Production Rate in the Past Two to Three years- Energy Consumption and Unit Energy Consumption in the Past Two to Three Years- Economical Effects*4 Top Policy and Awareness of Top Management- Attitude of Top Management toward activities for EE&C
- Specific Support for Project by Top Management (Technical or Financial Assistance,etc.)- Situation of the Project (Recommended Proposal) in The Company’s Business Plan
- Policy Statement including Issuance of Long Term Plan and Investment Plan
*5 Organization for Implementation- Organization Chart (including Small Group Activities)*6

Future Development- Recommendation/Proposal for Further Improvement(Item, Briefed Description on Expected Effects and Schedule)- Status of Acceptance/Commitment by Top Management

III-12

Table III-3-2-1: Program of the Research Forum in Japan

Date
March 21 (Tue.)

Activities
Lv. Each Country
Ar. Tokyo

1. Opening
2. Presentation for Information Exchange(1) Basic Plan on ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management
March 22 (Wed.) AM
for Major Industries and Buildings (ECCJ)(2) Award System for Energy Management in ASEAN Countries(2-1) Philippines (Don Emil
3. Presentation of Japanese Award System (1)- Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management
PM in Japan- Some Awarded Cases
3. Presentation of Japanese Award System (2)- Example to Application Form Used in Japan
March 23 (Thu.) AM- Procedure for Application and Evaluation including Criteria for Evaluation ofApplied Cases
4. Meeting with Japanese Members Implementing Award System
PM - Free Discussion, Exchange Opinoin and Advice(Various Issues on The Award System including Evaluation)
5. Workshop : Application Form for ASEAN and Future Schedule
March 24 (Fri.) AM 5-1. Discussion
Required Items To Be Included in Application Form / Schedule
5. Workshop : Application Form for ASEAN and Future Schedule
PM 5-2. Summarization of Results of Discussion
Preparation of Basic Form of Application Form (DRAFT) / Schedule

March 25 (Sat.)

Lv. Tokyo
Ar. Each CountryIII-13

ANNEX III-3-2-1
Basic Application Form

PREFACE
PurposeThe “ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Major Industries
and Buildings” aims at the following.
(1) Providing the factories and buildings with incentives to improve reputations of applicantshence improve their business(2) Collecting / Disseminating successful cases in ASEAN countries(3) Giving the winners opportunities for business related to energy conservation

Required Conditions for Application(1) Under the condition that the applicants shall provide information and data possible topublish, applicants shall complete the stipulated application form.
(2) In the selection process, applicants shall correspond to questions from the judging
committee and receive the survey team of committee members and/or focal points, if
required.
(3) Prior to submitting the application form, all the activities of the proposed cases shall becompleted and actual effects of the project shall be confirmed for an appropriate period
after the completion.
(4) In principle, excellent cases chosen as candidates including winners will be disclosed inpublishing form or web site.
(5) Language
Application format submitted to the committee shall be written in English.

III-14REQUIRED ITEMS FOR APPLICATION FORM

CATEGORY OF APPLICATION: INDUSTRY / BUILDINGTITLE OF ACTIVITY/ PROJECT :GENERAL OUTLINE OF APPLICANT(Do not abbreviate but write in the full official name)(1) Name of Company:(2) Address of the place of business:(3) Number of Employees:(4) Industry/Building Sector:(5) Paid-up Capital:(6) Nature of Business:postal code:(in units of $ USD)

(7) Contact:
Name:
Section or Department / Position:
Telephone No.:Fax No.:E-mail:

ABSTRACT (Please describe in 200 words)

KEYWORD

PROJECT SPECIFICS(1) Overview of Activity / Project
Description,
Reasons,
III-15

Purpose
Target(2) Top policy on Energy Conservation / Energy Management(Including specific support for the activity / project)(3) Specifics of Energy Saving Activities (during the last 2 years)- Specific Measures and Activities implemented for Improvement
Plan and Implementation including process, steps and time schedule for realization- Yearly Energy Consumption / Unit Energy Consumption (base load)
Energy unit in (Electricity: kWh / Fuel kg, kl, m3 etc. (with MJ /(kg or kl, etc.))
Preferably Production Volume / Mass, Width, Numbers etc. to Derive Unit Consumption- Identification of Problems and Countermeasures- Setting Target- Special efforts to Study Measures and the implementation for Improvement- Responsible Organization or Team to implement the Activity / Project(Including “Small Group” etc. to develop / implement activities)(4) Actual Results- Effect of Reduction in Energy Consumption
In Comparison of Yearly Energy Consumption / Unit Energy Consumption for one year
or longer after Improvement with Base Load
- Economical EffectReduction in Cost / ROIPayout time
- Featured Efforts of Activities- Impact on Environment(5) Additional Benefits- Potentiality of Applicability for Dissemination and Estimated Effect(Number of Potential Factories / Buildings, Utilization of Technology in A Similar
Factory / Building, etc.)- Creativity / innovation or new ideas- Sustainable Activities and Implementing Organization (Organization Chart, New
Standardization, New Operation Mode, etc.)- Other Tangible and Intangible Effects (Increasing business efficiency, quality,
productivity, safety, morale, better communication and pleasant workplace, etc.)(6) Future Energy Improvement Activities(7) Supporting Document
Total number of pages not exceeding 15 including photograph and appendicesIII-16

ANNEX

III-3-2-2
Revised Schedule(1) Determination of the judging committee members• February 2006 (Continued in accordance with the procedure previously informed))(2) Research forum in Japan for some of selected judging committee members• March 2006
Circulation of Draft Application Form among Focal points(3) Finalization of Application Form
• April 2006
EE&C-SSN Meeting (Approval of Application Form and Plan)(4) Call for First Application• May to July 2006
Inception Workshop for 2006 - 2007
Start of Activities of "Energy Management" Projects (Including Local Workshops) in June
(5) Screening in Each Country• August to September 2006 (if necessary)(6) Determination of Local Candidates• October 2006 (if necessary)(7) Competitive Presentation by Local Candidates in Each Country• November to December 2006 (if necessary)
Research Forum (2nd)(8) Decision of First Local Winners• December 2006
(9) Presentation by Local Winners• February 2007 (Summary and Post Workshop)
Number of Local Winners:- Basically two (2) winners for Major Industries and Buildings in each country- Twenty (20) Final Candidates (= Two winners / country x 10 Countries)(10) Determination of Two (2) ASEAN Winners and Two (2) Runner-ups• March 2007
- One (1) Winner / One (1) Runner-up for Major Industries- One (1) Winner / One (1) Runner-up for Buildings.
(11) Publishing through Website of ACE & ECCJ
• May 2007
20 Cases of Local Winners including ASEAN Winners

III-17

IV

Policy on Future Activities to Develop the ASEAN Energy Management System

IV-1

Proposed Basic Plan of the ASEAN Energy Management System and its
Operation Procedure

Based on the basic concept of the ASEAN Energy Management System which was discussed
and agreed in the fiscal year 2004 and the results of discussion and survey made in the fiscal
year 2005, the more detailed and specified plan for the ASEAN Energy Management System
was studied and the developed plan was discussed and agreed in the Summary and Post
Workshops. It is aimed that to the ASEAN Energy Management System should be sharedby
all the ASEAN countries.
IV-1-1 Outcome of Discussion in the Research and Study Workshop in Japan (July
2005)
This five-day workshop was held in Tokyo from July 25th to 29th 2005, as one of the hosting
programs of training on energy conservation. (This program was called as the “1stMulti-Country Training Program on Energy Conservation.”) Twenty members participated in
the course and the invitees consisted of one or two members from each ASEAN country andrepresentatives of the ASEAN Center for Energy (ACE). In reality, ECCJ invited the focal
points and / or their delegates who are basically the officials from energy related ministries
and agencies of each country.
The purpose of the workshop was for the participants to come up with better ideas andrequests for the plan of the ASEAN Energy Management System through a brain storming
session, and to have them reflected in the establishment of the plan. The workshop programaims at achieving the following. First, the participants would study the Japanese situation
including the political measures which have been implemented, activities of theimplementation organizations, and the present situation of energy conservation activities ofcorporations. Next, they would visit to factories and buildings and observe / learn the
Excellent Case of Energy Conservation. Then, on the last day of the workshop, they would
have a brainstorming session and discussion, to wrap up the activities. Table IV-1-1-1 below
shows the program for the workshop.
Prior to the workshop, the participants were requested to prepare the reports (called as“Country Report”) with the following contents for the participants and Japanese to share
information through the presentations of these reports on the first day of the workshop.
♦ Outline of the countries’ energy infrastructure or basis of management systems♦ Suggestions on the ASEAN Energy Management System♦ Requests for the ASEAN Energy Management System

The summarized present status and evaluation of the infrastructure / basis for energy
management clarified the following two problems common to many of the countries.
(1) The weak incentives for promotion of energy conservation because of low energy prices
which are subsidized by the government(2) Weak awareness and a lack of knowledge on energy conservation in the private sector
partly because of the above situation

IV-1

In addition to the above problems, half of the participating countries pointed out that there
should be improvements in political measures. In the light of this situation, the participants
shared the understanding that there were large challenges to overcome to promote energy
conservation. Also, they shared the idea that the first step for establishing the plan was toclarify which aspects and through what activities the ASEAN Energy Management System
could effectively contribute to the solving these problems. After sharing the above
information and recognition on the present status, they studied the Japanese situation throughlectures and tours, to use it as a reference for the discussion.
Table IV-1-1-1: Program of the Research and Study Workshop in Japan
Morning Session
9:30〜 12:30

Date

Afternoon Session
14:00〜 17:00

Orientation / Program Guidance /Opening Ceremony

LECTURE:
Prom otion of Energy Conservation in Japan by
ECCJ

25 July M on KEYNOTE LECTURE:
Energy Conservation Policy andM easures by M ETILECTURE:
Energy Conservation Law 26 July Tue
System for Qualified person for Energy
M anagement in Japan

27 July W ed

LECTURE:
Energy Conservation Audit & ESCOLECTURE:
Energy Conservation Law- Top Runner System
VISIT:
Excellent Consum er Products Shop of Energy
Conservation (Bic Camera)
VISIT:
Excellent Building of Energy Conservation(Itabashi W ard Office)

VISIT:VISIT:
Excellent Company of Energy
Excellent Case of Energy Conservation
28 July Thu
M anagement(M itsubishi(OSRAM -M ELCO)Electric Co.,ltd)

29 July

Fri PRESENTATION: Country Report

PANEL DISCUSSION: Final report
Program Evaluation / Introduction of Next
Training Course / Conclusion
Closing Ceremony

According to the Country Report, it is noteworthy that five countries informed that there were
implementing organizations for implementing energy audits and training and theorganizations have been already established or now in the process of establishing. Thisconfirmed the importance of the survey and discussion on the possibilities of utilizing theexisting implementation organizations, as discussed in Chapter II.
Figure IV-1-1-1 shows the outcome of the Country Reports.

IV-2

No. ofcountries

Excellent

Good

Need
improvement

Political measures/legislation

Market priceIntermediate

Subsidized

Setting of energy prices

EstablishedIn the process of
being establishedNotestablished

Implementation Organizations

Very active

ActiveWeak

Activities in the private sector

Figure IV-1-1-1: Situation on the establishment of energy management systems in
ASEAN countries
Based on the outcome of the above-mentioned activities, the participants had a brainstorming
session to create ideas and proposals including requests while taking into consideration the
proposals, requests and wishes which had already been raised by the countries. In this session,
the participants discussed the elements / functions be included in the ASEAN Energy
Management System. There were many ideas, opinions, proposals and requests raised, and thebrainstorming session concluded that mainly the following functions should be included in the
ASEAN Energy Management System.
(1) Function to provide information and data
The system should provide information and data necessary for the policy considerationsof the countries and energy conservation activities of each company. It should include thebest practices, effective technologies, information on effective projects, and data such asenergy indices.
(2) Function to provide services for energy audits and training
This would include effective use of the existing implementing organizations or an idea toestablish new ASEAN implementation organization(s).
(3) Function of training and advice to improve the personnel capabilities for implementation
This would include activities which utilize the above-mentioned implementation
organizations.

IV-1-2 Proposed Plan of ASEAN Energy Management System and Procedure to Workthe System
1.

Scope of the functions to be included in the ASEAN Energy Management System
The scope of functions to be included in the ASEAN Energy Management System issummarized as in Table IV-1-2-2. These are based on the contents of the basic concept
for the ASEAN Management System which was discussed in the fiscal year of 2004, theoutcome of the above-mentioned Research and Study Workshop, and the outcome of the
discussions with the existing implementation organizations in ASEAN countries in thefiscal year of 2005. As confirmed by discussions made in the past, the establishment ofpolitical measures and institutional frameworks is the issue which each country shallIV-3

implement. Therefore, regarding this issue, the ASEAN Energy Management System
will only equip with only a function of information services to support such a process.
Table IV-1-2-2: Functions which should be included in the ASEAN Energy
Management System
Necessary Elements

1. Political measuresand institutionalframeworks
2. Implementation
organizations(shared among
ASEAN)
3. Improvement ofconditions forpromotion of energy
conservation by
private companies

A. Information Sharing

Functions Required
B. Provision of
Facilities and Services

Element 1-A

Out of Scope

Element 2-A

Element 2-B

Element 2-C

Element 3-A

Element 3-B

Element 3-C

C. Framework andRules for Operation
Out of scope(Except the part needed
for Element 1-A)

In accordance with the above basic idea, the ECCJ team is presently studying andpreparing for provision of the following functions.
In the area of information services so far, the PROMEEC (Major Industries) and
PROMEEC (Buildings) have been preparing the technical directory of energy
conservation technologies for major industries and buildings and a database forpromotion of energy conservation. Under the guidance and supervision of ECCJ, ACE
is conducting the editorial work of the technical directory of energy conservation
technologies and the design and development of the database. Also as aforementioned,
for the purpose of sharing and dissemination information on the best practices in energy
management, the plan of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy
Management for Major Industries and Buildings has been developed and its actual
implementation is in process of preparing to start in early 2006.
Regarding the implementing organizations, the most important expected functions are
essentially provision of services for training, education and energy audits.
For the improvement in infrastructure and environment for private enterprises topromote energy conservation, it will be very effective to develop a guideline forvoluntary activities by self-help efforts, to provide information of suppliers oftechnologies and equipment for energy conservation in addition to the above-mentioned
technical information etc.
Moreover, if possible, an organization of expert teams that can provide advice when
consulted. The plan proposed by ECCJ, as mentioned above, was discussed as possible
future activities.
2.

Procedures of providing the functions of the ASEAN Energy Management System
As for the information services, it is realistic to utilize the existing system for the ACE
or ECCJ website, in terms of cost, easiness of accessibility by many people considering
the widespread use of computers. Concerning information gathering, it is possible tocollect and build up information on best practices in energy management through theoperation of the award system.
IV-4

Regarding the implementation organizations, the most realistic option is to utilize theexisting implementation organizations in ASEAN countries. Therefore, we will need todevelop the further specific and detailed plan to operate the system based on the study
and discussion made in the fiscal year of 2006. Of course, if the needs and demands are
increased to an extent that exceeds the capacity of the existing implementing
organizations, it may be required to establish a new ASEAN organization which can
implement full-scale operations from energy audits to training. However, the priority
shall be to start working the system and clarify points necessary for modification, rather
than the establishment of a new organization. In this context, the best method will be tostart with effectively utilizing the existing implementing organizations by the ASEAN
ten ASEAN countries, as mentioned above.
Regarding the improvement in infrastructure and environment for private enterprises topromote energy conservation, it is important to gather the key persons from enterprises
and provide information on energy conservation and also effective for business byutilizing various workshops, in addition to relying on the access by people to thewebsite. Moreover, the gathering of useful information for the information services is
crucial, it is also important to ask for the cooperation of private companies in providing
the information taking some opportunities such as workshops.
3. Procedure of operation of the ASEAN Energy Management System
The details of the operation method will be studied and discussed from the fiscal year of
2006. ECCJ will draw up the proposed plan and discuss it with concerned people fromthe ASEAN countries to develop the specific plan for the operation method.

IV-2

Proposed Future Policies on Establishment of the ASEAN Energy Management
SystemBased on the results of discussion made in the Post Workshop in the fiscal year of 2004, theimportant requirements for the ASEAN Energy Management System are as follows.
(1) The basic role of the system is to provide functions and tools for implementation for the
purpose of supporting governments and private companies in the activities for
improvement for promotion of energy conservation.
(2) The system functions related to the policy and legal frame work of the individual
governments shall not be in does not include activities on the political measures or
institutional frameworks of each country.
(3) In the future, the system have the function as a coordination organization that will play arole of efficiently and effectively implementing cooperation on energy conservation
between ASEAN and countries outside the region such as Japan or the EU.
(4) The above functions of the system can be shared among the ASEAN countries.
Figure IV-2-1 shows the basic concept of the ASEAN Energy Management System, which
was agreed upon based on these policies.

IV-5

“ASEAN Energy Regional
Management Effective
System”
SupportEach Country System
Policy / Law

Services To Be Provided
Information
Energy Audit / Training
Guidance / Advice
etc.

Cooperation
with Japan,
EU, etc.

Implementation
Organization
GlobalPrivate Business /Activity
Energy..... C BA
MarketFigure IV-2-1: Basic concept of the ASEAN Energy Management System
As described above, the system will need to have implementation functions for providing
information services, services to conduct energy audits, training and education, advisory
services for implementation of specific activities, and organizing campaigns for improving
awareness, etc. Then, the establishment of an operation system shall be developed to provide
these functions.
From an operation point of view, it will be necessary to design the most appropriate wholesystem in both hardware and software sides, considering the realization of the policy to share
the ASEAN Energy Management System among ASEAN countries. Also, considering thesystem’s future role to effectively implement the cooperation projects between ASEAN andthe countries outside the region, it will be required to organize a coordination team for the
ASEAN Energy Management System.
Figure IV-2-2 shows the concept of the ASEAN Energy Management System, based on theabove vision.

IV-6

Information
Service
EnergyAudit

Advisory
Service“ASEAN Energy
Management System”
Campaign/
Award
SystemTraining
Service
Coordination

International
Cooperation
on EM for ASEAN

Figure IV-2-2: Conceptual picture of the ASEAN Energy Management System
When we see the whole picture, it would be easier to found an organization to collectively
provide all the functions mentioned above. However, to launch such an organization, theconsensus should be established among the ASEAN countries since it would require a longtime and a big cost. Therefore, it is desirable to effectively utilize the existing organizations
and facilities as a realistic way of proceeding with the project.
It is very fortunate that we could see the possibility of utilizing the existing implementation
organizations of the ASEAN countries to provide the energy audits and training services,
through the above-mentioned survey and discussion. In detail, however, each organization is
working under different policy frame works and business conditions in each country.
Therefore, there are variations in the areas of their specialty, personnel and facilities such asmeasuring instruments that they possess, even if the function of implementing energy audits iscompared. Also from a capacity point of view and in the areas in which they can provide
services, they differ from organization to organization. These situations may cause a concern
on problems of inconsistent quality of services that they provide. However, we can also
predict that there will be a variation in the level of the clients as well. This may mean that
there are various choices and an appropriate variance is good for clients in the ASEAN
countries. Nonetheless, it is essential for these organizations to reach at least the minimum
standard of quality and capacity. Therefore, these existing organizations will need to work on
capacity building also through providing their services to other countries.
On the other hand, there is an issue of what sort of operation the ASEAN Energy Management
System should realize for the clients of ASEAN countries to utilize these existingorganizations. According to the results of the past survey and discussions, in principle these
implementation organizations could provide their service by payment of clients for services.
The current plan is to discuss the proposed basic procedure and make a decision on the basic
procedure with the concerned people of the ASEAN countries in April 2006 and onwards. It isconsidered that a realistic way is to actually implement the basic procedure agreed on a trial
basis, clarify problems and find solutions, as we go.

IV-7

Provision of the functions to implement energy audits and training is essential to firmly
establish the energy management system of each company. We will need to go through thefollowing stages to establish a sustainable energy management system for promoting energy
conservation in companies. At first, they will need to start with technology transfers fromexternal sources for the introduction of the system, and next move on standardization and theestablishment of a related database based on the activities through their own self-help efforts.
Then, the final step is to try operating, working and improving the established system
including an organization for energy management on a daily basis for firmer energy
management. The ASEAN Energy Management System will especially support the initialstage of this process, such as the introduction of energy conservation technologies and energy
management, and systematization and standardization for building the system. Figure IV-2-3
shows this concept.

Initial Introduction- Information- Knowledge- Training / Practice- OJT

1. Organization
for E. M.
2. Standardization- Prototype Std.
- Regular Practice- Evaluation- Refining
3. Dissemination
In-house System

Systematization

Energy Audit- Data- Information- Data Cumulating- Preparation for
Database
Setting
Support by “ASEAN Target
Guideline

Finalized Total
System with
- E.M. Organization- Finalized Standard- Utilization of
DB/BM/GL System- PDCA System
For Revision /TuningE.M. System”

Figure IV-2-3: Establishment of a sustainable energy management system in companies
and the scope of the ASEAN Energy Management System
Concerning the energy audit, experts from ECCJ have been transferring technologies andexperience through the practices infield which have been implemented in factories andbuildings in ASEAN countries by employing the method of OJT (on-the-job training) for theconcerned local people in each country. Therefore, now it is the stage of disseminating thetechnologies and experience transferred not only domestically but also in the other ASEAN
countries. These activities are already being implemented in the PROMEEC (Major
Industries) and PROMEEC (Buildings) projects. For the ASEAN Energy Management
System, it will be ideal to support companies’ activities to promote energy conservation ineach country and function the tools to share and disseminate the achievements of the activities
through working the system under cooperation with these projects,.
Therefore, it is important for the system to have a function which supports the efforts ofcompanies in each country in implementing energy audits or training for energy conservation,in order to promote energy conservation. As a result of the survey conducted in 2005, wefound that it would be possible to utilize each country’s existing implementation organizations
to realize this function hence to discuss proposed procedures of sharing and utilizing theseIV-8existing organizations among ASEAN countries hereafter.
The other required function of the system would be to put in place a comprehensive andstandard procedure called as the energy conservation promotion cycle for different sectors ofindustries or buildings. This cycle consists of the three stages of the identification of
improvement by conducting energy audits, the improvements and then the evaluation of
results. Energy conservation should be promoted on an individual factory / building basis,
therefore, it is essential to build a consistent “in-house system” available for individual
factories and buildings to establish a sustainable energy management system by utilizing asystem base provided through the ASEAN Energy Management System. Establishing the“in-house database/benchmark/guidelines” using this system base will be the foundation of
establishing the database/benchmark/guidelines at a higher level in each country or in
ASEAN.
For information services, we will need to implement specific activities based on the following
points, as we mentioned before.
(1) To verify useful information for ASEAN countries and evaluate priorities.
(2) To secure information sources to gain information available for publication through:• Establishing the award system• Increasing the number of cooperating companies(Cooperating companies are ones which provide factories or buildings for energy audit
activities, participate in workshops, or provide information by responding to requests.)(3) To build a system to share and disseminate the collected information.
• Preparation of a database including a system to allow access by the clients to the
database.
(It will be possible to utilize the existing databases and websites of ACE and ECCJ.)• Preparation of a system to maintain and update data, including modification of thedatabase.
Figure IV-2-4 shows the concept of the system to utilize the existing implementing
organizations based on the above points.
To establish the above-mentioned functions, in Phase-1, it is necessary to specify the details
from the functions with a high priority so that they can start operating the ASEAN Energy
Management System equipped with the most basic functions. In this way, the most importantis to start with functions ready for working.
In Phase-2, targeting to build the better system, any problems with functions worked inPhase-1 should be improved and further functions shall be added.
Currently, the PROMEEC (Energy Management) project aims at completing Phase-1 within
about five years hence within the next 3 years because two years have past already.
In this process, the achievements and problems found in the Phase-1 should be verified andthe direction and specific activities shall be in Phase-2.
Figure IV-2-5 shows the basic long-term schedule to establish the ASEAN Energy
Management System.

IV-9

Utilization of Existing
System and Website of ACE

Customers
•
•

ASEAN
Database

Database
Industries

Database
Input / Engineering

Buildings

Figure IV-2-4: System Concept to Utilize The Existing Implementing Organization

Phase

Main Activities

Phase - 1

Investigation /Study Concept

PrepareBasic

Develop Specific
Plan

2004

2005

2006 2007 2008 After
2009

Functions Prepare / Work
Functions
Verification Result
Phase - 2

Study / Prepare /Add Functions

Figure IV-2-5: Basic Schedule to Establish the ASEAN Energy Management System

IV-10

V

Results of Discussion in the Summary and Post Workshops

The Summary and Post Workshops were held on January 27th 2006. Table V-4-1 shows theagenda of the workshops.
V-1

Results of Discussion on the Basic Plan of ASEAN Energy Management System
and Procedure to Work The System

The proposed basic plan described in IV-1-2 in Chapter IV was explained, discussed andbasically agreed by the focal points. As a result, it became possible to partially establish thebasic plan to work the functions of the ASEAN Energy Management System from theactivities ready to start providing specific services step by step. However, as mentioned before,
there are some issues which should be discussed and decided in detail through the activities
for working the system and it will be necessary to modify a part of the basic plan in the future.
Regarding the specifications of the database for major industries and buildings which are notagreed by some of the focal points, for example, the specifications should be authorized in the
Inception Workshop for the fiscal year of 2006 based on the continues discussion of thespecifics further developed by ECCJ. More specifically, ECCJ considers that it is important toestablish the “in-house database/benchmark/guidelines” for each factory or building toestablish the system for sustainable energy management. On the other hand, some focal point
thinks of a different hierarchy of system such as at the country level or at the ASEAN level,
through their experience in another on-going project on “ASEAN Benchmarking for
Buildings” Therefore, the understanding of the scope and the direction of the activities bysuch focal points was not sufficient.
V-2

Results of Discussion on Proposed Scope of Services and System for Utilization of
the Existing Implementation Organizations of Each Country in the ASEAN
Energy Management System

As described in II-3-1 and II-3-2 of Chapter II, it was confirmed that the existing
implementation organizations of each country could be utilized in the following three areas.
This was presented in the Summary Workshop.
Implementation of energy audits in the industry sector and the building sector
 Implementation of training on energy management and energy conservation technologies,
and education for students, technicians, etc.
 Provision of information


Although the specific plan on the procedure to utilize the existing implementation
organizations will be further studied soon in the future, the following are agreed by the focal
points taking the present incomplete agreement into consideration.
Namely, at first, more specific procedures further developed early next fiscal year by ECCJ
should be discussed and agreed by the focal points. Following that, the plan will be tried towork for reviewing and improving. This kind of trial will be repeated.

V-1

V-3

Results of Discussion on Proposed Basic Plan for the Award System of Best
Practices in Energy Management for Major Industries and Buildings andProcedure to Operate the System in the ASEAN Energy Management System

The basic plan described in III-1 and III-2 of Chapter III and a consensus to go wasestablished by the focal points. In accordance with the consensus, specific activities have been
already implementing. Specifically, in order to start the first application to meet the scheduleof awarding the first winners in 2007, the required preparations such as selection of themembers of the judging committee and development of the application form have alreadybeen in process.

V-4

Policy on the Future Activities and Proposal of the Basic Implementation Plan for2006 to 2007

Based on the above-mentioned outcomes of the discussions, as the basic proposed basic
implementation plan for 2006 – 2007, it was agreed that the following activities should be
intensively implemented.
1.

Implementation of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in energy management
Because 2006-2007 will be the first year of implementation, a very smooth
implementation of the system should be targeted. Therefore, the team shall make best
efforts to deepen understanding of the stakeholders through explaining the specifics ofthe system in the local workshops held in each country and evaluation criteria for the
judging committee members (each one from each country) including concerned to
discuss and establish.

2.

Establishment of the proposed procedure of effectively utilizing the existing
implementation organizations in each country and the launch of its trial use
ECCJ will introduce the proposed procedure at a workshop in each country. Based on theconsensus, the procedures will be started to work on a trial basis. Through thismethodology, problems to improve will be identified to develop a better procedure.

3.

Establishment of the proposed procedure for information dissemination
The specific plan and measures will be determined and realized to disseminate the bestpractices in implementation of energy conservation collected through the above award
system, the technical directory and “in-house database/benchmark/guidelines” in processof development in the PROMEEC (Major Industries) and PROMEEC (Buildings)
projects.

4.

Preparation of other tools
The plan proposed by ECCJ was to utilize or edit some existing information andhandbooks for promoting energy conservation by choosing those available for ASEAN
among the tools which ECCJ has prepared through the other projects under cooperation
with some countries. For example, the plan includes the activities to develop a directoryV-2

of ESCOs, handbooks to give companies with guidelines for energy conservation
activities through their self-help efforts based on small group activities, TQM (total
quality management) and TPM (total productive maintenance).
5.

Expansion of the number of companies who participate in and cooperate with the
PROMEEC project
It is also important to try increasing the number of companies who will cooperate withthe project. The companies are expected to participate in the project by providing
opportunities of conducting energy audit in factories or buildings and realizing activities
to improve based on recommend and to disseminate the results. Namely, they will beshowcases in ASEAN. Moreover, in addition to the showcases, we also expect morecompanies to become information sources in the future. For this purpose, the focal
points and ACE will invite as many companies as possible to the workshops which will
be held in the respective countries.

V-3

Table V-4-1: Programs of the Summary Workshop and the Post Workshop
SUMMARY WORKSHOPS AND POST WORKSHOPPROMOTION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION (PROMEEC)(MAJOR INDUSTRY, BUILDING AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT)
SOME-METI WORK PROGRAMME 2005-2006
26-27 January 2006
BANDUNG, INDONESIA
Day 1: 26 January
We held the Summary Workshop for major industries and buildings. The details are omittedhere.

Day 2: 27 January 2006SESSION 3
9:00 9:40

9:40

-

10:10

10:10
10:25
10:40

-

10:25
10:40
11:10

11:10

-

11:30

PROMEEC – Energy Management
Summary of Activities by Mr. Kazuhiko Yoshida (ECCJ)
1. Results of “Research & Study Workshop in Japan”
2. Results of Intensive Surveys/Discussion in 6 ASEAN Countries- Possibility to Utilize Implementation Organization for EE&C Existing in ASEANCountries- Proposed Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Major
Industries and Buildings
3. Proposed Plan for “ASEAN Management System” : Presentation & Discussion by
Mr. Kazuhiko Yoshida (ECCJ)
Coffee Break
Q&A
4.Proposed Plan for 2006 – 2007 : Explanation & Discussion by Mr. Kazuhiko
Yoshida (ECCJ)
Q&A

11:30

-

13:00

Lunch

13:00

-

14:15

13:00
13:20
13:40
14:00
14:15

-

13:20
13:40
14:00
14:15
14:45

14:45

-

15:00

POST-WORKSHOP
Confirmation of Summary Workshop by Mr. Kazuhiko Yoshida (ECCJ)
1. Important Achievement
2. Plan for 2006 - 2007
PROMEEC-Major Industry
PROMEEC–Building
PROMEEC-Energy Management
Q&A
Closing Statements
By Chairperson (EE&C-SSN)
By Mr. Tsuzuru Nuibe (ECCJ)By Dr. Weerawat Chantanakome (ACE)
By Representative of Host Country
Coffee for Relaxation
End of Session for Day 2

V-4

VI Reference Materials

VI – 1Documents Used for Intensive Survey and Discussion the
Implementation Organizations of Each Country
Questionnaire
Summary of the Results of the Survey and Discussions

VI - 2

Materials Used for the Summary and Post Workshops

VI – 1Documents Used for Intensive Survey and Discussion the
Implementation Organizations of Each Country
Questionnaire
Summary of the Results of the Survey and Discussions

Questionnaire
PROMEEC (Energy Management Project) : Questionnaire for Site Activities (Intensive Survey and Discussion)
SHEET - 1
(Purpose of Intensive Survey and Discussion)
Discussion and Survey to Study on
Possibilities to Utilize the Existing Implementing Organization for Providing Services for "ASEAN Energy Management System"
Required General Information (As of 2005)(Name of Country)(Name of Organization or Company)
Category( ) Private( ) Government( ) Other( ) Local( ) International(Ministry in Charge :(Description :(Outline of Organization / Company)
1. Business Category( ) Implementing Organization Assigned by Government( ) ESCO( ) Engineering Company( ) Equipment Supplier( ) Other :(Specific Description)
2. Annual Business Size
USD/Y
3. Year of Establishment
4. Address or Location
Headquarter
Branch(es)5. Number of Employees

6. Business in EE&C

Total
Staff : Energy Audit
Staff : Training
Staff : Engineering / Project for EE&C
Staff : Campaign / Event / Education
Staff : ()( ) Energy Audit( ) Training( ) Engineering( ) Equipment Supply
Name of Equipment( ) Accreditation Certification
Specific Description :( ) Provision of Information( ) OtherSpecific Description :))PROMEEC (Energy Management Project) : Questionnaire for Site Activities (Intensive Survey and Discussion)
SHEET - 2
Is it possible to provide other ASEAN countries with your services ?
Specific Services Possible to Provide
YES( ) Energy Audit( ) For Industrial Sector (Factories)
Field :( ) For Building Sector (Commercial Buildings)( ) Training( ) Lecture by Textbooks( ) Workshop( ) Training with mini-plant( ) Training in Factories and / or Buildings( ) Provision of Information (Please describe specifically.)( ) Others (Please describe specifically.)

Conditions for Provision( ) No Condition( ) Under the Following Conditions
1. Finance( ) Fee by Clients( ) Financial Assistance by Government
2. Business Approval Required( ) By the Ministry in Charge( ) By Stockholders( ) By Other Third Party(ies)
3. Technical Capability / Intellectual Properties( ) Agreement or Written Consent with The Third Party(ies)( ) Enhancement / Expansion of Owned Facilities( ) Employment of Additional Auditor / Trainer( ) Employment of Interpreter( ) Revision of Program and Document( ) Improvement in Office Automation and IT Environment
4. Infrastructure( ) Accommodation / Meal Service / Medical Service( ) Transportation
5. Others : Please describe specifically.

NO Do you wish to be a technical service provider for ASEAN ?
NO No Wish / No Intention / No Interest
YES What kind of service do you want to provide ?
( ) Energy Audit( ) Training( ) Provision of Information( ) Provision of Information( ) Deregulation by Your Country
Agreement by The Third Party(ies)Expansion / Modernization of Facilities
Employment of Capable Engineers with Language Capability
Capacity Development of The Existing Employees( ) Under Technical Assistance from Advanced Country(ies)( ) Increase in Available Interpreter( ) Others (Please describe specifically.)PROMEEC (Energy Management Project) : Questionnaire for Site Activities (Intensive Survey and Discussion)
SHEET - 3
Please provide the following information on facilities and capacities for services by your organization / company. (As of 2005)
1. Energy Audit(1)
Profile of Auditors
Available Field
Number of Auditors & Qualification
Experience : Number of Auditors
Total No.
Certified Accredited > 3 Years 3 - 10 Years > 10 Years
BuildingIndustry(Sector)

Total(If Any)(If Any)(2)

Qualification / Background of Auditors( ) Job Experience(Engineer / Technician from Factory / Building)( ) Academic Experience( ) Certified by( ) Accredited by(3)

Owned Facilities
Sensors for Measurement
Pressure GauFlowmeter
Pitot Tube
Anemometer(Mechanical)
ThermometerInfrared ViewCalorie meter(Thermal)
Gas Analyze Gas Sampler(Chemical)
Clampmeter Luxmeter(Electrical)(Data Collection) Data Logger
Software(Data Processing) Computer
Bus / Vehicle with Equipment for Energy Audit
YESNO

2. Training(1)
Profile of Trainers
Major Course
Thermal

Number of Trainers & Qualification Experience : Number of Trainers
Total No.
Certified Accredited > 3 Years 3 - 10 Years > 10 Years(Total)A. General
B. Industry
C. Building
Electricity(Total)A. General
B. Industry
C. Building

Other
Specialized (Please Specify.)
A.
B.
C.
D.

(Total)Total(If Any)(2)

Qualification of Trainers( ) Job Experience( ) Certified by( ) Accredited by(3)

Profile of Trainees( ) Top Manager / Company Owner( ) Manager (Including Energy Manger)( ) Engineers( ) Technicians( ) Student (University / College Level)( ) Student (Under Senior High School)(If Any)

(
(
(
(
(
(

) persons/Year) persons/Year) persons/Year) persons/Year) persons/Year) persons/Year(4)Main Components of Curriculum and Features( ) Lecture( ) Training with Use Mini-plant( ) Training with Visits to Factories and/or Buildings( ) Practical Training for Energy Audit by Mini-plant( ) Practical Training for Energy Audit at Factory and/or Building( ) Specialized Workshop and/or Forum(5)

Owned Facilities( ) Building and/or Lecture Room(s) for Training( ) Lecture Facilities (Visual / Audio Facilities such as PC, LCD, OHP, etc.)( ) Training Facilities (Mini-plant)( ) Training Facilities (Sensors for Energy audit))( ) Training Facilities (PC Simulator, etc.)( ) Library( ) Publishing Textbook( ) Accommodation( ) Transportation

Summary of the Results of the Survey and Discussions – 1
Implementing Organizatio
1.General Information
Place
Category
Business Category

Annual Business SizeYear of Establishment
NO. of Employee
Staff: Energy Audit
Staff: Training
Staff: Other
Business in EEC
2.Future Participation in
ASEAN EM System
Energy Audit:Facory
Energy Audit: Building
Training:Lecture
Training:Workshop
Training:Mini-plantFee for Sevices
Approval to be required
Ip/Copy right
Infrastructure

Indonesia
IN - 2IN - 1
Jakarta
MoEMR
Training
requested by
Gov.

JakartaKL
Stateenterprise Government

PenangGovernment

Training, ESCO,
Audit

Operation to
Training,
maintenance
ESCO, Audit
services/ESCO

Training

5MillUS$/Y
150MW/y2-3
13Eng.29Economist 2-3

1987
51
Total 26,Risk
Management 2

ManilaGovernment

TaguigQuesonGovernment NPO
Training,
Audit
Training, Audit
Training
requested by
Gov.

700Mill.RM/Y
118
2
2

40

Ho Chi MinhNPO

Training,
Audit

Implementin
g by Gov.

Implementin
g by Gov.

Training, Audit

Audit,Training

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
yes

Yes
yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
yes
yes
Boiler,Combustion

To be Required To be Required To be Required To be Requiredby shareholder Information to GBy oneself
By Ministry
No
No
Free
Free
Accom
No

Ind.1
Build.1

5Eng's,4Tec'n Hospital in Saba
50Experiences Outsourcing
Various Industries
Outsourcing

Yes
All graduatedSame as left
All
No

Yes
Same as left
Some
No

Auditor cum
Traininer

Outsourcing
Elec.1/Econo.1 Outsourcing

Yes
All graduated
-

Yes
Yes
-

For Officials

Curriculum

For Officials
Lecture/On site
20person/Y for Engrs
20 person/Y for Tecn.

On site Training

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No

Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No

1981
175
8

2Mill.US$
2002
1995
30
12
12 10&Collaborati
8 on:20
10

YES

Yes
No

In University
In University

Yes
Yes
-

No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No

Training

Yes
Yes
Yes
yes

Yes

By Ministry
By oneself
No
NO
Accom.Transp.

EnergyAudit,Training,
Audit,Informati
Engineeringon Provider

EnergyAudit,Training,Information

YES

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
In-Site

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
In-Site

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
In-SiteBy oneself
No
No

8
4

18 Build.20

By Shareholder By Ministry

To be Required

Yes
Transport.

No
No

No

2 Build.
8 9 Indust.
Various Ind.
Build.

8
3
Various Ind.
Build.

Yes
Graduate

18 Therm.20,Elec.20
License Eng.
Yes

Registered Eng.

University
University
University
University
Yes
University
University

Audit,Training,
Engineering

To be Required To be Required To be Required To be Required To be Required To be Required

License Eng.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Registered Eng.
Yes
Yes
Yes
No

Outsourcing

Engneer,Top

No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No

Ho Chi Minh
Gov.

14
20

Training

Yes
All graduatedNo exist in Indo.
Some
Yes
Industrial 2Electrical 2
Mechanical 1
National Exam.
Yes
All graduatedNo exist in Indo.

Ha NoiGovernment

20

Audit,Training,
Engineering

Build.2 Ind.2
Build.12 Ind.17

VN - 3ManilaNPO

50KUS$/Y
1979

14

Audit,Training,EnAudit,Training,Engi
Training
Audit,Engneeringineeringneering

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
yes
yes
Field Training
No(Field Training)
To be Required
To be Requiredby Ministries
By oneself
No
Required approval
Meal,Hotel,medical

Viet Nam
VN - 1
VN - 2Ph - 4

Eng.1
Other 2Trainees

Own Facility
Lecture Room
Lectre Facility
Training Facility
Library
Textbook
Accomodation
Transportation

Philippines
PH - 2PH - 3PH - 1

JakartaStateenterprise

2001
57

3.Existing Resources
Auditor(3-10 years)
Auditor>10 years

Qualification
Job Experience
Academic
Certifed/Accredited
Instrumentation
Bus/vehicle
Trainer(<3years)
Trainer(3-10 years)
Trainer >10 years
Qualification
Job Experience
Academic
Certifed/Accredited

Malaysia
MY - 1MY - 2IN - 3

Top
Manag.,Mana
ger

Local Fact.

technical topics

Lecture/On-site

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes

Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No

Yes
Yes
Yes
Graduate
All graduatedFichtner/Colenco
Some
All
All
Almost all
No
Yes
No
2Therm.2Elec.
Same as Audit
10Ther.4Elec
6 Same as Audit
4Ther.2Elec. 2(Therm.)
6(Thermo)
Same as Audit
6(Elect.)
4(Elect)
Same as Audit
Yes
Yes3(other)
Same as Audit
Same as Audit
CertifiedSame as Audit
Technical
Top
All level
Manager,EngiManag.,Man All Level
exc't.student
neer,Technicia
agern,Operator
All styleLectureLectureBasic&Advance On-site
On-site5~10 Training
Mini.Plant
Mini.Plant
No
No
No
No
No
No

Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No

Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No Mini plant Yes(Simulators
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No

Summary of the Results of the Survey and Discussions – 2
Thailand
Implementing Organization

TH -1

Singapore
TH - 3TH - 4Bangkok
PrivateEnergyConsultant

Bangkok
PrivateEngineeringCo.

TH - 2TH - 5TH - 6

TH - 7SN - 1

1.General Information
Place
Category
Business Category

Pathum Thani
Government
Implementing Org.

Bangkok
PrivateEC Consultant

Bangkok
Private
ESCO,Eng.Ot
her

Bangkok
PrivateEng. Co

BangkokNPO
Implementing
Org.

Sigapore
University
Implementing
Org.ESCO

1.2Mill US$

S$2M

by Government
Annual Business SizeYear of Establishment
NO. of Employee
Staff: Energy Audit
Staff: Training
Staff: Other

Business in EEC
2.Future Participation in ASEAN
EM System
Energy Audit:Facory
Energy Audit: Building
Training:Lecture
Training:Workshop
Training:Mini-plantFee for Sevices
Approval to be required
Ip/Copy right
Infrastructure

750Mill
1992
40
6
14
8
Outsourcing 6~7Co.

1998
16
6
2
4

52
20
12
20

8
7
7
8

EnergyEnergyEnergyAudit,Training,
Audit,Enginee Audit,Training,Info
Engineering,Ermation Provider
ring
quip.Supply
Yes
Yes
Yes

EnergyAudit,Training,Informati
on Provider,Accredit
Certificate

19
12 30(Eng)EnergyAudit,Training,
Engineering

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
On-siteYes
No
Yes
To be Required To be Required To be RequiredTo be RequiredTo be Required
By themselves By themselves By themselves By themselves By themselves

Training

Yes
Yes
Yes
To be Requiredby DEDE
DEDE

On-Site training
To be Required
By themselves

6 Build:12 Ind:13
Ind:9

Yes
No
Yes,All
Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Future Expansion

To be Required
By themselves
Agrrement Yes
Future Expansion

Ind.:24

Buil:6,Ind:6
Buil:4,Ind:10

Buil:7,Ind:
Buil:4,Ind:4

Buil:3,Ind:3
Buil:2,Ind:2

Buil:0,Ind:1
Buil:9,Ind:9

Buil:5,Ind:2
Buil:5,Ind:2

Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes

No
No

Yes
Yes

Yes
No

Yes
No

All YesYes

All YesElec.:3,
Therm.:2

Therm:3,Elec.:3Therm:4,Elec.:
Ther.2,Elect.:2 Therm.1,Elect.
Other:2
Yes
Yes

6
8 Therm:4,Elec.6
Other:1
Yes

Yes
Yes?

TraineesPRE

Curriculum

All type(Simulator)

Top
Manager(50),E
Manag.(50)Ma
ngineer(100),T Manager,engin
Top Maneg.Eng.Tech
nager(100),En
echnician(300), eer,Technician
gineer(600),T
Student(50)echnician(50)LectureLectureLecture,Onsite Lect.,Onsite,Mini Plant

Yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
No
Yes

Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes

Own Facility
Lecture Room
Lectre Facility
Training Facility
Library
Textbook
Accomodation
Transportation

1992
70
10

EnergyEnergyAudit,Training,Engin
Audit,Training,eering3.Existing Resources
Auditor(3-10 years)
Auditor>10 years

Qualification
Job Experience
Academic
Certifed/Accredited
Instrumentation
Bus/vehicle
Trainer(<3years)
Trainer(3-10 years)
Trainer >10 years
Qualification
Job Experience
Academic
Certifed/Accredited

1996
40

1.2Mill US$
0.3Mill
1995
250
31

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes(sensor)
Yes-

Therm:0,Elec.:0 Therm:5,Elec.:5
Therm.2,Elect.:2Therm.2,Elect.:2
Other:4
Other:2
Yes
Yes
PRE
Top
Manag.(120)Ma
nager(300),Eng
ineer&Tech.(760)
Lect.,Onsite,Mini Plant

No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes

Top
Manag.(100)Manager(150),Engineer(150),Student(50)Lecture,Workshop

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

VI - 2

Materials Used for the Summary and Post Workshops

Permission shall be required to give out thecontents of this report in advance due to the
copy right in a written form. To gain
permission, please contact the International
Engineering Department of the Energy
Conservation Center, Japan.
Phone: +81 3 5543 3018
Fax: +81 3 5543 3022

J08

PROMEEC for 2005-2006
Energy Management Project
Summary Workshop- Proposed Future Plan -January 27th, 2006

Kazuhiko Yoshida
General Manager, International Engineering Dept.
The Energy Conservation Center, Japan
ECCJ

1. Project Status of 2006-2007
3rd Year(Newly Established in 2004)

Results of Activities in 2005 – 2006
(1) Research & Study Workshop in Japan- Learning and Observation What Japan do- Brainstromed Ideas / Proposals for “ASEAN
Energy Management System”(2) Intensive Survey at 5 Countries
Possibility to Utilize The Existing Implementing
Organizations
20 Organizations are eager to provide their Services
for Energy Audit, Training and Others
ECCJ

2Results of Activities in 2005 – 2006
(3) Study / Discussion on Plan of Award System
of Best Practices in Energy Management for
Major Industries and Buildings- Discussion through Local Intensive Survey- Almost Established Plan
(4) Study on Plan for “ASEAN Energy
Management System”- Development of Proposed Plan Based on
The Results of The Above Activities
ECCJ

3

2. Basic Direction for 2006-2007(1) Activities Based on The Proposed Plan
(2) Start Working Functions of “ASEAN Energy
Management System”
1) Award System for Best Practices in E.M.
(3) Development of Specific Detailed Plan
1) Procedure to Utilize The Existing
Implementing Organizations
2) Procedure to Disseminate Technical Directory &In-house DB/BM/GL System
3) Development of Other Tools for Energy Management

Items (2)&(3) : Cooperative Implementation with
Projects for Major Industries & Buildings
ECCJ

4General Time Schedule
Phase

Main Activities

Step - 1

Investigation /Study Concept

PrepareBasic

Develop Specific
Plan

2004

2005

2006 2007 2008 After
2009

Functions Prepare / Work
Functions
Verification Result
Step - 2

ECCJ

Study / Prepare /Add Functions
5

Updated Plan for 2006 - 2009
Project

Phase

Energy Step 1
Manage. Prepare
Basic
Function

Activities

2006-07

Develop Further Specific
Plans
Verification / Feedback
Functioning Award System
for Best Practice
Dissemination of Info.

Continue- Develop Procedure to
Utilize Exist. Org.
- Functioning ProcedurePlan

2007-08

2008-09

Start

Database to Disseminate

Step 2Development of Info. Sys.
Development of New HB.
Study Prepare / Add
FunctionsOperation of System

Trial

Finalize

Ramp-up

Tune-upStart

Start-up

6

ECCJ

3. Activities for 2006-2007
1. Start “Award System for Best Practice in E.M.
for Major Industries / Buildings in April(1) Intensive Workshop
Explanation & Advice on Application (in Max.
6 Countries Such as Cambodia Lao PDR, etc.,
Including Judging Committee)(2) Research Forum in Japan (Evaluation &Development of Dissemination Procedure): March 2006 (Kick-off),
1st: December 2006 (1st Evaluation)
2nd
7
ECCJ

3. Activities for 2006-2007 (Continued)
2. Development of Procedure to Utilize
The Existing Implementing Organizations(Introductory Trial, if Possible)(1) Intensive Workshop (Same as 1 (1))
Explanation & Discussion of Proposed
Procedure(2) Trial Operation to Probe Points to Improve
3. Development of Procedure to Disseminate
Information as follows(1) Successful Cases from Award System(2) Technical Directory / In-house DB/BM/GL Sys.
ECCJ

8

3. Activities for 2006-2007 (Continued)
4. Development of Other Tools for Energy
Management(1) Total Energy Management Handbook for
ASEAN (Based on HB Developed by ECCJ)(Guidance for Voluntary Activities Based on
Small Group Activities and TQM/TPM)(2) Directories of ESCOs, Suppliers(Technology and Equipment for EE&C)
5. Development of Information Sources(1) Intensive Workshop (Same as 1 (1))
Encouraging Companies to Participate in
The Project Activities
ECCJ

9

(DRAFT) Basic Time Schedule for 2006 - 2007
Project and Activities

2006
April

May

June

July

2007

Remarks

August Septembe October NovemberDecember January February March（Overall Activities）
A. Develomment of detailed Implementation Plan
B. Preparatory Work
C. Inception Workshop
D. Implementation of 3 Projects
E. Post Workshop
F. Preparation of Report

PROMEEC (Energy Management)（Basic Activity）(1) Detailed Plan / Analyses / Preparation for Survey, etc.
(2) 1st Site Activity （Discussion / "ASEAN EM System", Intensive Survey with WS)(3) 2nd Site Activity （Discussion / "ASEAN EM System", Intensive Survey with WS)(4) Research Forum (Eevaluation for Award System)(5) 3rd Site Activity (Summary & Post Workshop)(6) Preparation of Report

ECCJ

Cambodia
Indonesia
Lao PDR
Myanmar
OthersMax. 6Countries

10

Thank You
Very Much

The Energy Conservation Center, Japan
11

J06

PROMEEC for 2005-2006
Energy Management Project
Summary and Post Workshop- Results of Activities -January 27th, 2006

Kazuhiko Yoshida
General Manager, International Engineering Dept.
The Energy Conservation Center, Japan(On Behalf of METI)ECCJ1Contents

1. Targets for 2005 - 2006
2. Activities to Achieve Targets andResults
3. Conclusion

ECCJ

1. Targets for 2005 - 2006

ECCJ

3

Targets for 2005 – 2006 (1-2)(Target 1)
Identification of Components Possible to
Share among ASEAN or To Be Added for"ASEAN Energy Management System"(Target 2)
Development of The Award System for The
Best Practices in "Energy Management for
Major Industries and Buildings"
ECCJ

4

Targets for 2005 – 2006 (2-2)(Target 3)
Assessment of Possibility & Procedures /Rules to Utilize & Function Services andFacilities Owned by The Existing
Implementing Organizations in ASEAN(Target 4)
Assessment of Prioritized Components
and Establishment of The Specific Plan of"ASEAN Energy Management System"
ECCJ

5

2. Activities to Achieve Targets andResults

ECCJ

6

Activities to Achieve Target
Target 1

Target 2

Research &Study (JP)New
Research
Forum (JP)Target 3

Target 4

Local
Intensive
SurveyWorkshops

Summary &Post

Internal
Analyses &
Study
ECCJ

7

Actual Activities of PROMEEC(Energy Management) 2005-2006
Project / Activities
April

May

June

July

2005
August September October November December January

2006
February

Remarks
March(Overall）
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.

Development of Detailed Project Plans / Preparatory Work
Contract with ACE
Inception Workshop
Implantation of Projects
Post Workshop
Preparation of Report（3-Project Management）(1) Planning / Preparation / Evaluation(2) Coordination Meeting in Indonesia or Japan(3) Inception Workshop(4) Post Workshop

6/21&22

1/26-1/27

6/30-7/1

３．Energy Management(1) Preparation : Detailed Plan / Arrangement for 1st Site Activity(2) "Research and Study Workshop in Japan"(3) 1st Site Activity (Intensive Study Workshop (1))(4) Analyses of 1st Site Activity Results / Preparation for 2nd Site Activity(5) 2nd Site Activity (Intensive Study Workshop (2))(6) Analyses of 2nd Site Activity Results / Preparation for 3rd Site Activity(7) 3rd Site Activity (Summary Workshop)(8) "Reaeach Forum in Japan" on Award System(9) Preparation of Report

ECCJ TeamECCJ(Country)
Indonesia
Malaysia
Philippines
Thailand
Vietnam

9/5-9/13
7/25-29
Indonesia (9/5&6)
10/20-10/26
Singapore (Probe by Q/N)
Malaysia (9/8&9)
Philippines (9/12&13) Vietnam (10/20&21)
Thailand (10/25&26): Mr. Kazuhiko YOSHIDA (PM)Mr. Takashi SATO

1/26-1/27

8

Activity for Target 1
Research & Study Workshop in Japan
Brainstormed Ideas & Proposals
1. Learning and Observation ofActual Situations of Various Activities forEnergy Conservation Including
Energy Management Realized in Japan
2. Information Exchange between
Participants including Japanese
3. Discussion and Brainstorming To Create
Ideas on The Plan for The “ASEAN Energy
Management System”
9
ECCJActivity for Target 1
Research & Study Workshop in Japan
Participants
1. Total Number : 20
1 or 2 from Ten (10) Country and ACE
2. Categories
1) Focal Points of EE&C-SSN for PROMEEC
2) Persons from- Governmental Organizations Related to EE&C
- Non-governmental and Non-profit
Implementation Organizations for EE&C
ECCJ

10

Activity for Target 1
Research & Study Workshop in Japan
Program and Schedule
M orning Session
9:30〜 12:30

D ate

Orientation / Program Guidance /Opening Ceremony
25 July Mon KEYNOTE LECTURE:
Energy C onservation Policy andMeasures by METI

26 July

Tue

LEC TUR E:
Energy C onservation Law System for Qualified person for
Energy Management in Japan

Afternoon Session
14:00〜 17:00
LECTURE:
Promotion of Energy C onservation in
Japan by ECC JLECTURE:
Energy C onservation Law- Top Runner System
VISIT:
Excellent Consumer Products Shop of
Energy C onservation (Bic Camera)

27 July Wed

LEC TUR E:
Energy C onservation Audit & ESCOVISIT:
Excellent Building of Energy C onservation(Itabashi Ward Office)28 July

VISIT:
Excellent Company of Energy
Management(Mitsubishi Electric C o.,ltd)

VISIT:
Excellent Case of Energy Conservation(OSR AM-MELCO)PRESEN TATION :PANEL D ISCU SSION: Final report
Program Evaluation / Introduction of N ext
Training C ourse / Conclusion
C losing C eremony

29 July

ECCJ

Thu

Fri

C ountry R eport11Activity for Target 1
Research & Study Workshop in Japan
Evaluation of Current Status- Summary of Country Report 10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
No. ofExcellent

Countries

ECCJ

Good

To Be
Improved

Policy / Regulative Framework

Market Based

Partially
Subsidized

Subsidized

Energy Pricing System

EstablishedEstablishing

To Be
Established

Implementation Organization

Very Active

ActiveWeak

Activities by Private Sector

12Activity for Target 1
Research & Study Workshop in Japan
Brainstormed Idea and Proposal
Including Desire / Wish

1. Provision by Country Report
Proposal and Desire / Wish
Lecture and Visits to Business
Units Best-Practiced in Japan
2. Brainstorming
Additional Ideas and Proposals
ECCJ

13

Activity for Target 1
Research & Study Workshop in Japan
Results : Ideas / Proposals for“ASEAN Energy Management System”

1. Provision of Information / Database
Useful Best Practices / Technology/ Data / Other Project Information
2. Facilities / Services / Organization
to Implement EE&C Activities
Energy Audit / Training / Education
3. Building Capacity of Persons
ECCJ

14

Approach to Develop “ASEAN
Energy Management System”
Investigation on Actual Status
Of “EM” Infrastructure
Informationfor Study (’04-’05)
Service
EnergyBrainstormed Audit

Ideas“ASEAN Energy
Management System”
Campaign/
Award
SystemTraining
Service
Coordination

International
Cooperation
on EM for ASEAN
ECCJAdvisory
Service15

Activity for Target 2
Local Intensive Survey
Development of Basic Plan forAward System of Best Practices inEnergy Management for
Major Industries & Buildings
1. Draft Proposal by ECCJ
2. Intensive Survey in 5 Countries
Discussion with Focal Points
3. Preliminary Proposal by ECCJ
4. Request of Comments from All Countries
ECCJ

16

Activity for Target 2
Local Intensive Survey at 5 Countries
Discussing Draft Plan with Focal Points
1. Visited Countries to Discuss Draft
Indonesia / Malaysia / Philippines
Thailand / Vietnam
2. Request of Comments by Sending Draft
Singapore
Internal Study by ECCJ
3. Preparation of Preliminary Plan by ECCJ
4. Comments of Preliminary Plan by E-Mail
17
ECCJ

Activity for Target 2
Outline of Preliminary Plan (1) :Award System for Best Practices in E.M.
(Purpose)Collect & Share Information
on Best Practices in E. M.

1. Category : Industries and Buildings
2. 2 Winners & 2 Runner-Ups Each Year
1 Winner & 1 Runner-Up Each Category
among 2 Candidates from Each Country(1 for Industries + 1 Buildings)
3. Publishing Awarded Cases on Website
ECCJ

18

Activity for Target 2
Outline of Preliminary Plan (2) :Award System for Best Practices in E.M.
4. Judging Committee
1) Number of Members : 10 to 12
Main Members from Industries (7 or More)- Recommendation by Focal Points andACE / Advice by ECCJ for Finalization- Assignment for 1 Year or 2 Years (Max.)2) Research Forum in Japan (March 2006)- Participants : Members from Industries- Procedure & Evaluation Criteria in Japan
19
ECCJ

Activity for Target 2
Outline of Preliminary Plan (3) :Award System for Best Practices in E.M.
5. Schedule for The 1st Award
April 06 : Preparation of Application Form
May 06 : Call for Application
December 06 : Decision of Local Winners
February 07 : Presentation by Focal Points(Same Timing as Post Workshop)
March 07 : Determination of ASEAN Winners
May 07 : Publishing Winners on Website
ECCJ

20

Activity for Target 3
Local Intensive Survey
Possibility to Utilize The Existing
Implementing Organizations / ESCOs
1. Preparation of Questionnaire by ECCJ
2. Sending Questionnaire to Implementing
Organizations through Focal Points
3. Intensive Survey in 5 Countries- Visit to Implementing Organizations- Interview / Discussion Based on Reply
to Questionnaire- Observation of Owned Facilities
21
ECCJ

Activity for Target 3
Local Intensive Survey(No. of Implementing Organizations)
Total

Government

PrivateIndonesia

3

30

Malaysia220Philippines

4

2

2

Thailand

7

1

6

Vietnam3

2

1(Singapore)

(1)

(0)

(1)
22

ECCJ

Total 20 Organizations including ESCOs

Activity for Target 3
Local Intensive Survey : QuestionnairePart 1. Outline of Organization & BusinessPart 2. Possibility / Intension to Provide
Services and Facilities for OtherASEAN Countries(Including Conditions for Provision)
Part 3. Services and Facilities Owned(Energy Audit and Training, etc.)
Reply to Questionnaire
Visit : Interview / Discussion / Observation
ECCJ

23

Activity for Target 3
Local Intensive Survey : Results - 1
Almost All Organizations Showed Strong
Intension to Provide Other Countries with
Their Services and Facilities as Business !
1. Services Possible to Provide(1) Energy Audit
For Industries and Buildings(2) Training / Education (Inc. for Students)
Energy Management / Energy Audit, etc.
(3) Others (Engineering, Information, etc.)
ECCJ

24

Activity for Target 3
Local Intensive Survey : Results - 2
2. Conditions for Service Provision(1) All Organizations
1) Fee for Services(2) Some Organizations
2) Approval by Owners etc. (Some)
3) Expansion of Facilities and Manpower
4) Language is English.
(3) A Few
4) Agreement on Copy Right etc.
5) Interpreter for Local Language-English
ECCJ

25

Activity for Target 3
Local Intensive Survey : Results – 3(Scope of Services by The Implementing Org.)
EnergyAudit

Training /Education

Other
Services

Number ofOrganizations
2
12
2
4

TOTAL
ECCJ

20
26

Activity for Target 4
To Develop Plan of "ASEAN Energy
Management System"
1. Assessment of Prioritized Functions(1) Provision of Useful Information
Award System (Preparation In Process)
Dissemination of Other Information(2) Provision of Energy Audit and Training
Measures Under Study(3) Provision of Other Services
2. Development of Specific Plan of “ASEAN
Energy Management System”
27
ECCJ

3. Conclusion

ECCJ

28

Conclusions
1. Targets Were Achieved or Will Be
Achieved until March 2006 Under
Cooperation by Focal Points and ACE.
2. The Achievements Will Be Basis of andAccelerate The Activities for 2006 - 2007
(1) Launching Award System for E. M.
(2) Utilization of Existing Services forEnergy Audit and Training(3) Study to Work Other Functions
ECCJ

29

Thank You
Very Much

The Energy Conservation Center, Japan
30

J07

PROMEEC for 2005 - 2006
Energy Management Project
Summary Workshop

ASEAN Energy Management System- Proposed Basic Plan January 27th, 2006

Kazuhiko YOSHIDA
General Manager, International Engineering Dept.

The Energy Conservation Center, JapanECCJContents
1. Philosophy and Basic Concept of
The System
2. Required Infrastructure and Functions
for Energy Management
3. Conceptual Plan on Specific Activities
4. General Schedule
ECCJ

1. Philosophy and Basic Concept of
The System

ECCJ

3

“ASEAN Energy Management System” andCountries’ Respective Systems“ASEAN Energy Regional
Management Effective
Each Country System
System”
SupportServices To Be Provided
Information
Energy Audit / Training
Guidance / Advice
etc.

Cooperation
with Japan,
EU, etc.
ECCJ

Policy / Law
Implementation
Organization
GlobalPrivate Business /Activity
Energy..... C BA
Market4

Activity for Target 1
Research & Study Workshop in Japan
Evaluation of Current Status- Summary of Country Report 10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1

Enhance
PrivateActivities

Utilize
Existing
Facility

No. ofExcellent

Countries

ECCJ

Good

To Be
Improved

Policy / Regulative Framework

Market Based

Partially
Subsidized

Subsidized

Energy Pricing System

EstablishedEstablishing

To Be
Established

Implementation Organization

Very Active

ActiveWeak

Activities by Private Sector

5Activity for Target 3
Local Intensive Survey : Results – 3(Scope of Services by The Implementing Org.)
EnergyAudit

Training /Education

Other
Services

Number ofOrganizations
2
12
2
4

ECCJ

Potentiality to
TOTAL
Utilize Owned
Capability

20
6

Approach to Develop “ASEAN
Energy Management System”
Results of Past
Activities In 2004 - 2006

Information
Service

EnergyAudit

Advisory
Service“ASEAN Energy
Management System”
Campaign/
Award
SystemTraining
Service
Coordination

International
Cooperation
on EM for ASEAN
ECCJ

7Steps to Build Sustainability of E. M. inEnterprises
Initial Introduction- Information- Knowledge- Training / Practice- OJT

1. Organization
for E. M.
2. Standardization- Prototype Std.
- Regular Practice- Evaluation- Refining
3. Dissemination
In-house System

Systematization

Energy Audit- Data- Information- Data Cumulating- Preparation for
Database
Setting
Support by “ASEAN Target
Guideline

E.M. System”

ECCJ

Finalized Total
System with
- E.M. Organization- Finalized Standard- Utilization of
DB/BM/GL System- PDCA System
For Revision /Tuning8

2. Required Infrastructure and Functions
for Energy Management

ECCJ

9

ASEAN Energy Management System(Requirement-1)
1. Infrastructure for Energy Management
and Required Functions
1-1. Building Policy / Directive Framework- Information and Data to Study
1-2. Establishing Implementation Organization for ASEAN- Organizing / Building Capacity
1-3. Building Environment to Promote EE&C in Private Sector- Information / Guideline for Voluntary Activities
ECCJ

ASEAN Energy Management System(Requirement-2)
2. Required Function
2-1. Sharing Information

2-2. Provision of Facilities and Services

2-3. Scheme and Rule to Work The Functions of Items
2-1 and 2-2

ECCJ

ASEAN Energy Management System- Required Infrastructure - Function Matrix Required Function
RequiredInfrastructureA.
Sharing
Information

B.
C.
Provision of
Scheme / Rule
Facility / Service to Work A & B

1. Policy andDirective
Framework

AREA – 1A

Out of Scope

Out of Scope

2. Implementation
Organization(Organization /Capacity)

AREA – 2A

AREA – 2B

AREA – 2C

3. Environment toPromote EE&C in
Private Sector

AREA – 3A

AREA – 3B

AREA – 3C

ECCJ

12

ASEAN Energy Management System- Required Function Matrix : Activity Status Required Function
RequiredInfrastructureA.
Sharing
Information

B.
Provision of
Facility / Service

C.
Scheme / Rule
to Work A & B

1. Policy andDirective
Framework

AREA – 1A
Under Study

Out of Scope

Out of Scope

2. Implementation
Organization(Organization /Capacity)

AREA – 2A
Outline andReference ofOrganizations

AREA – 2B
Utilization ofServices of
Existing Org.

AREA – 2C
Under study

3. Environment toPromote EE&C in
Private Sector

AREA – 3A

AREA – 3B

AREA – 3C

ECCJPracticesBest Practices
Award System
Technologies … Tech. Directory .. Info. System 13..

Required Function : AREA – A (Information)
RequiredInfrastructure

Required Function
A. Sharing Information

1. Policy andDirective
Framework

AREA – 1A

2. Implementation
Organization(Organization /Capacity)

AREA – 2A

3. Environment toPromote EE&C in
Private Sector

AREA – 3A(1A1) Policy and Law in Each Country(2A1) Implementation Organization in Each Country(Capacity / Reference / Scope of Activities)(3A1) Technical Directories for Industry & Building(3A2) Database / Benchmark /Guideline Systems(3A3) Successful Examples for Energy Management(3A4) Procedure for Energy Management in Enterprises(3A5) Technology Suppliers / ESCOs / Consultants
14

ECCJ

Required Function : AREA – B (Service Provision)
RequiredInfrastructure
1. Policy andDirective
Framework

Required Function
B. Provision of Facility / Service

Out of Scope

2. Implementation
Organization(Organization /Capacity)

AREA – 2B

3. Environment toPromote EE&C in
Private Sector

AREA – 3B(2B1) Energy Audit(2B2) Training / Education including Enlightenment(2B3) Others (Consulting / Engineering, etc.)(3B1) Technical Information(3B2) Data and Information to Study(3B3) Information on Private Activities(3B4) Guideline for Voluntary Activity(3B5) Information on EC Projects by Companies
15

ECCJ

Required Function : AREA – 2C (Scheme & Rule)
RequiredInfrastructure
2. Implementation
Organization(Organization /Capacity)

Required Function
C. Scheme / Rule to Work A & B

AREA – 2C(STEP – 1)
(2B1C1) Develop System / Rule to Utilize Existing
Facilities including to Give Related Information(2B1C2) Organize ASEAN-Japan (A-J) Expert Team(For Coordination including Advice)(STEP – 2)
(2B1C1) Expansion of Existing Facilities (or)Establishment of New Facility for ASEAN(2B1C2) Training of Auditors and/or Trainers for ASEAN
by A-J Team
ECCJ

16

Required Function : AREA – 3C (Scheme & Rule)
RequiredInfrastructure
3. Environment toPromote EE&C in
Private Sector

Required Function
C. Scheme / Rule to Work A & B

AREA – 3C(STEP – 1)
(3B/C1) Develop of System to Collect and Disseminate
Information (Award System for Best Practices
in E.M. and Information of Suppliers including
ESCOs for EC Technologies, etc.)(3B/C2) Utilize Technical Directory and Database etc.
Developed by Projects (Industries & Buildings)(3B/C3) Develop Effective Handbook(s)(Ex. Manual Based on SGA / TPM / TQM)
(3B/C4) Organize A-J Taskforce for Advice / Assistance

ECCJ

17

Required Function : AREA – 3C (Scheme & Rule)
RequiredInfrastructure
3. Environment toPromote EE&C in
Private Sector

Required Function
C. Scheme / Rule to Work A & B

AREA – 3C (Continued)(STEP – 2)
(3B/C1) 1) Implement Award System for E.M. / Build
System to Disseminate Collected Information
2) Increase Companies for Cooperation(Through Activities for PROMEEC Projects)(3B/C2&3) Advisory Service by A-J Expert Team
(Including Training of ASEAN Advisors)

ECCJ

18

3. Basic Plan on Specific Activities

ECCJ

19

1. Award System for Best Practices in Energy
Management for Major Industries and Buildings
PurposeCollect and Disseminate Successful Cases ofEnergy Management in Factories and Buildings
Outline of Procedures
1. Organize Judging Committee & Preparation
2. Call for Application in Each Country
3. Select 2 Local Winners (Industries & Buildings)
4. Determine ASEAN 2 Winners and 2 Runner-Ups
5. Publish through Media Such as Website
Schedule for 2006 - 2007
1. Call for Application: April 2006
2. Determine ASEAN Winner: March 2007
ECCJ

20

2. Utilization of The Existing Implementing
Organizations for Energy Audit and Training (1)PurposeUtilize Services Owned by Existing Implementing
Organization for Energy Audit in Factories andBuildings and for Training
Benefits for Customers
1. Most Cost Effective and Realistic Solution to
Requirement
2. Possible to Choose An Suitable Organization
Benefits for Service Providers
1. Expand Business2. Increase Availability of Facilities and Manpower
3. Possibility to Enhance Facilities / Capacity
ECCJ

21

2. Utilization of The Existing Implementing
Organizations for Energy Audit and Training (2)Basic Procedures(Development of Detailed System will Be Studied
Further)
1. Open Tender through Website
2. Direct Contact and Negotiation between
Customers - Service Providers
3. Consideration on Intermediate Coordination /AdviceOutstanding Issue for Consideration
Measures to Assure Quality of Service Providers
ECCJ

22

3. Dissemination System of Technical
Directories for Major Industries and Buildings(Status)
Under Development through Projects for Major
Industries & Buildings and Edition by ACE(1) Available for ALL Users(2) Wider Coverage of Technology andApplication including Practice for EE&C
(3) Flexibility to Update and Expand(4) Various Possible Access to Directory
User Friendly !
ECCJ

23

4. Development of System for Database(Status)
Under Development through Projects for Major
Industries & Buildings with Design by ACE/ECCJ

Utilization of Existing
System and Website of ACE

ASEAN
Database

Database
ECCJ

Industries

Customers••

Database
Input / Engineering

Buildings

24

5. Development of TEM* Handbook for ASEAN
Philosophy and Concept(Area / Purpose)(1) Industry Sector : Inter-Industry to Individual Industries(2) Promote Companies’ EC Activities by All Participation
Management (Owner / Managers)
Engineers and Workers

Total Energy Management (TEM*) Handbook(Features)(1) Practice&Business - Oriented (than Technical)(2) User Friendly Guidance(3) Expandable Contents / Easy to Update(Expected EC Potential)
ECCJ

10 – 15% (By No/low Cost)25

5. Development of TEM Handbook for ASEAN
Basic Contents (Case Developed for Thailand)
I. Purpose and Background of TEM Handbook
Introduction / Purpose / Usage / Importance of Energy Management

II. Strategic Planning for EC by Participation
III. Implementation Steps of EC
CORE
IV. Successful Examples
PARTS
V. Additional Explanation on SGA(Basis) Small Group Activity (SGA) & TQM / TPM
VI. Appendix (Access to the Existing Various References)
Energy Statistics and Policy Information
List of References (Technical Manual / Law / Training Course, etc.)
ECCJ

26

6. Other Information Services
1. Directory of ESCOs
1) Company Name or Association
2) Reference of Business3) Contact
2. Information on Suppliers of Technology /Equipment for EE&C
1) Company Name
2) Business Category & Reference of Business3) Contact
ECCJ

27

4. General Schedule

ECCJ

28

4. General Schedule
Phase

Main Activities

Phase - 1

Investigation /Study Concept

PrepareBasic

Develop Specific
Plan

2004

2005

2006 2007 2008 After
2009

Functions Prepare / Work
Functions
Verification Result
Phase - 2

ECCJ

Study / Prepare /Add Functions
29

Thank You
Very Much

The Energy Conservation Center, Japan30

Regardless of the whole or a part of this document, thedocument shall not be copied without written prior consent
of the International Engineering Department, The Energy
Conservation Center, Japan.
The contacts are as follows.
TEL
FAX

81 – 3 – 5543 – 3018
81 – 3 – 5543 – 3022