Creation of p-wave Feshbach molecules in two dimensions
Mukaiyama laboratory Zhiqi Zhang
2016/03/10
1. Introduction
1.1 BackgroundIn recent years great progress has been made in the field of ultracold atomic physics with s-wave
interactions ( = 0). However the p-wave ( = 1, projections of the angular momentum are | | = 1and= 0) superfluidity with trapped Fermi gases has not been realized and it remains as one of thegreatest challenges. It is because of the experimental difficulties such as the instability of the p-wave
molecules and low phase space density. The p-wave interaction is anisotropic, where multiple phaseof superfluidities and the phase transitions are expected in ultracold atomic systems. This p-wave
superfluidity can also be found in the liquid 3He and Strontium Ruthenate superconductor. The
ultracold atomic system provides the ability to achieve difficult measurements and higher degree offreedom which are not available in other systems. Thus it plays an important role for researches incondensed matter physics, many-body physics and quantum phase transitions.
Similar to other systems like liquid 3He and Strontium Ruthenate superconductor, the formation ofpairs is essential to p-wave superfluidity in an ultracold atomic system. These pairs of molecules havethe possibility of forming a molecular Bose-Einstein condensate. Thus the formation of p-wave
Feshbach molecules is considered to be the precursor of p-wave superfluidity in an ultracold atomicsystem. Recent experiments and theoretical investigations have been carried out on creating p-wave
molecules [1-4]. An adiabatic magnetic field ramp method is used in the above experiments, molecule
creation rates of 15% [3] and 3% [1] are demonstrated. The experiment of p-wave Fermi gases in
optical lattices [5] focused on Feshbach resonances and possible superfluidity in low dimensions.
1.2 p-wave Feshbach resonanceOne of the essential tools in ultracold atomic system is Feshbach resonance. It enables the control of
atomic interactions by applying an external magnetic field. Each scattering channel depends on thespin configuration of the colliding particles, thus the two channels have different magnetic moments.
The two channels are separated into the so called open channel, and the bound state called closed
channel as shown in Figure 1. Feshbach resonance occurs when the total energy of the two free atoms
in the open channel is coupled to the bound state in the closed channel.
One of the properties of p-wave Feshbach resonance is the narrow resonance. It is caused by theEnergy
Interatomic distance R
Centrifugal barrierOpen channel

Closed channel

Figure 1: For p-wave Feshbach resonance withthe centrifugal barrier, the resonance isnarrower.
(1)

||

|=1
Quantization
axis

|=0

colliding atoms having to tunnel through thecentrifugal barrier before interacting with theother atom as shown in Figure 1.
Another interesting property is the splitting of
the resonance caused by the magnetic dipoledipole interaction. We consider a classical picture
shown in the Figure 2. In Figure 2(1)(a) therotations of the two spins are always stay side-byside, so the energies of the two atoms remain
constant as they rotate. While in Figure 2(1)(b)they alternatively change from an attractive headto-tail to a repulsive side-by-side configuration.
Thus the= 0 scattering state has a lower
energy because the attractive interaction and its
resonance occurs at lower magnetic fields.

For 40K, the splitting of the resonance is about
500 mG, which is also observed experimentally.
Previous experiment [2] with 40K, | | = 1 and= 0 p-wave molecules are created (| | = 1

molecules are “donut shaped”, see wavefunctionin Figure 2(2)). However, for 6Li, this splitting isonly about 10 mG, much narrower than 40K. In thecurrent setup, the stabilization of the magnetic
field is about 10 mG. Thus the two resonanceprobably overlap each other, making the splitting
not able to be resolved. This narrow splitting is
Figure 2: (1) Classical picture and (2) complex and extremely interesting. Not only
wavefunctions of the | | = 1 and= 0 multiple superfluid phases are possible,(quantization axis along z).
furthermore the phase transitions between
superfluid phases is possible. In order to study thisnarrow p-wave resonance of 6Li, it is necessary to study the accurate splitting to better understand thep-wave superfluid.
(2)

By using optical lattices, the dimensions of atomic quantum gases can be reduced by suppressing
scattering in specific directions. By the confinement of optical lattice, a low dimensional system isobtainable. Thus it is possible to select specificstates. In our experiment, we follow this idea andinvestigate on creating p-wave molecules in a 2D system by using a 1D optical lattice. First we focus

on the | | = 1 state, by investigating the creation of p-wave molecules of | | = 1 projection.
Our initial goal is to explore the possibility of creating a p-wave pairing superfluid.
1.3 Creation of p-wave Feshbach molecules
By using Feshbach resonance, molecules can be created. An adiabatic magnetic field ramp across theresonance can convert atoms to bound molecules as shown in Figure 3.
EnergyThe energies of the two atoms in the open
channel and the molecules in the closed channel
near the Feshbach resonance have the magnetic
field dependences. The black and the red lines
indicate the atoms in the open channel and boundstate in the closed channel respectively. One
would expect that by sweeping the magnetic field
across the Feshbach resonance adiabatically, theunbound atoms in the open channel can beconverted to the molecule state.

Feshbach resonance

Molecular state

Magnetic field

Atomic state

Figure 3: Creation of p-wave molecules via
adiabatic magnetic field ramps.

2. Preparation of a 2D system—Band mapping method
We start from a degenerate fermi gas of the state |1 atoms with atom number ~10 in a 3D system.
Then we use a 1D optical lattice along z-direction with variable lattice depths. The optical lattice isramped down adiabatically to zero in 2.5 ms. Figure 4(a), (b) and (c) show absorption images with 5
ms of Time of flight (TOF) of the atomic
cloud with variable lattice depths. Here
= 8.7
= 3.3
= 5.4
(d′)
(a)
(b)
(c)
lattice is along z-direction.
Figure 4(d′) shows the integration along
the lattice direction (z), which gives theinformation of the non-lattice direction.
We can see that without the confinement of
the lattice, atomic motion is Gaussian like.

(a′)

(b′)

(c′)

st

1 Brillouinzone

Position m
Figure 4(a'), (b') and (c') are theintegration from the non-lattice direction Figure 4: (a) (b) and (c) are the absorption images with(y) with different lattice depths, and the variable optical lattice depths. (a′) (b′) (c′) and (d′)
atomic momentum distributions are are the integration of the experimental data.
changing as shown. Indicating that withincreasing depth of optical lattice, the system is turning from 3D to 2D. In Figure 4(c') with lattice

depth V0 = 8.7, a near-square shaped image is observed. Indicating along the lattice direction, theatomic cloud is restricted to the ground state — within the 1st Brillouin zone. From Figure 4(c) we canknow the energy∿ 2.5 K , which is smaller than the interband transition energy(estimated to be around 8.4 K). Thus we confirm that the system is kinematically 2D.
3. Creation of p-wave molecules in a 2D system
In our first experiment (shown in black lines in Figure 5), we create molecules by ramping down themagnetic field near the |1 |1 resonance at= 158.5 G. Then we use an atomic resonant light(blast light) to remove the unpaired atoms (the molecules cannot sense the blast light because of thedifferent optical transitions). After shinning the blast light, we quickly increase the magnetic field todissociate the molecules. Lastly we take an absorption image of the dissociated atoms shown in Figure5(1).
In our next experiment, we keep theImaging
Blast lightBmagnetic field away from the resonance B
start
(1)
(shown in red lines), then blast the atoms,
and lastly take absorption image. No(2)atoms are detected as shown in FigureBres
5(2). It proves that without ramping themagnetic field near the resonance, notmolecules are created. Also indicating theFigure 5: Absorption image with ramping theblast light had almost removed all theunpaired atoms. Thus atoms shown in Figure magnetic field (1) across the resonance and (2)away from the resonance.
5(1) are only from the dissociated molecules.
4. Experimental results

In order to create molecule efficiently, one
important parameter is the speed of the magnetic
field ramp across the resonance. If the magnetic
field ramp speed is too fast, molecules cannot becreated. If the magnetic field ramp is too slow,
the collisions between the molecules and theatoms will cause the loss of the molecules. This
indicates that the magnetic field ramp speed
should be slow enough to be adiabatic.
We used a fixed starting magnetic field, andchanged the magnetic field ramp down time

Number of molecules

4.1 p-wave Feshbach molecule association

24x1032220
102030
Association time [ms]40

Figure 6: Number of molecules vs association
time with a fixed starting magnetic field Bstart.

(molecule association time). We plotted the number of molecules with variable association time. We
found out that at this situation we have more molecules at association time of 20 ms as shown in Figure⁄ = 0.12G/ms.
6, corresponding to a magnetic field ramp speed of
4.2 Blast light magnetic field
We further investigated the blast light magnetic field at where molecules can be created efficiently.
We change the initial and final ramping down magnetic field, but keep the association rate to be⁄ = 0.12 G/ms as we measured in the last experiment. The red line shows the blast light isBlast light

1.5

B-Bres = 0B-Bres = -20mG
B-Bres = 20mG

1.0

Number of molecules

B-Bres [Gauss]shined at the resonance magnetic field. The yellow and blue lines show the blast light magnetic fieldare 20 mG above and below the resonance, respectively shown in Figure 7. Figure 8 shows the numberof molecules vs the blast light magnetic field detuning B-Bres. We found out at around 22.23 mG below
the |1 |1 resonance we have more molecule creation.

0.5
0.0
05

10
Time [ms]1520

Figure 7: Time sequence of experiment forshining blast light.

325x1020
1510-200 -150 -100 -50
B-Bres [mG]050

Figure 8: Number of molecules vs blast lightmagnetic field detuning B-Bres.

4.3 Molecule dissociation
Previous experiment [3] demonstrated the cloud width expanding more widely with higher
dissociation magnetic field. However in our experiment, the cloud size do not change too much withhigher magnetic field. Neither the donut shape of the | | = 1 p-wave molecules is observed. Inorder to observe this donut shape, the dissociation energy has to be larger than the kinetic energy. Thus
if one can apply fast magnetic field ramps, it will lead to higher dissociation energy, thus more widely
the cloud could expand. With a fast enough magnetic field ramps, molecules will have enoughdissociation energy to fly away. In order to observe the donut shape, the magnetic field can be ramped
up very quickly. Though our current main coil has good magnetic field stabilization, it cannot provide
fast enough magnetic field ramps for the observation of the donut shape. Thus we use a new coil at thebottom of the glass cell, above the MOT coil, to generate the magnetic field to the atoms.

(1) 20x10
Number of atoms

3(2)

150A
1A
1.5 A
1.8 A

100A
1A

5

1.5 A

0

1.8 A
010Distance from the center [ m]20304050

Figure 9: (1) Absorption images with variable current running through the second coil.
(2) Radial profile of the average atom number vs the distance from the center.

We plotted the radial average atom number with the distance from the center point of the atom cloudwith variable current running through the new coil as shown in Figure 9(1). With higher current, thecenter part turns from sharp edge to a near-flat top. This is very likely to be the signal of the donut
shape of the dissociated molecules. Figure 9(2) shows the absorption images with different current in
the new coil. With increasing current, the average width is expanded, also indicating higher
dissociation energy is achieved by this new coil. We will work on applying higher current to provide
more dissociation energy to investigate this donut shape.
5. Conclusion
By using a 1D optical lattice, we are able to achieve a 2D Fermi gas. We confirmed this 2D systemby using a band mapping method. By adiabatically ramping the magnetic field across the resonance,
we created | | = 1 p-wave molecules using a 6Li gas in a 2D system. We studied the molecule

creation and detected the p-wave molecules. In the future, we will further investigate on optimizing
the molecule association and investigate on the donut shape.
6. Reference[1] R. A. W. Maier et al., Creation of p-wave molecules: PHYSICAL REVIEW A 81, 064701, 2010.
[2] J. P. Gaebler, J. T. Stewart, J. L. Bohn, and D. S. Jin, p-Wave Feshbach Molecules, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 98, 200403, 2007.
[3] Y. Inada, M. Horikoshi, S. Nakajima, M. Kuwata-Gonokami, M. Ueda, and T. Mukaiyama,

Collisional Properties of p-Wave Feshbach Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 101, no. 10, p.
100401, 2008.
[4] J. Fuchs, C. Ticknor, P. Dyke, G. Veeravalli, E. Kuhnle, W. Rowlands, P. Hannaford, and C. J.
Vale, Binding Energies of 6Li p-Wave Feshbach Molecules, Phys. Rev. A, vol. 77, no. 5, p.
053616, 2008.

[5] K. Günter, T. Stöferle, H. Moritz, M. Köhl, and T. Esslinger, p-Wave Interactions in LowDimensional Fermionic Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 95, no. 23, p. 230401, 2005.