SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F‘
È‘‘

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
OR
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromtoOR
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of event requiring this shell company report
Commission file number: 1-15270

Nomura Horudingusu Kabushiki Kaisha(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nomura Holdings, Inc.
(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

9-1, Nihonbashi 1-chome
Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8645
Japan

Japan
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(Address of principal executive offices)

Takumi Kitamura, 81-3-5255-1000, 81-3-6746-7850(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered

Common Stock*

New York Stock Exchange* Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares, each representing one share of Common
Stock.
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of theperiod covered by the annual report.
As of March 31, 2013, 3,710,960,252 shares of Common Stock were outstanding, including 22,948,546 shares represented by
22,948,546 American Depositary Shares.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. È Yes ‘ No
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ‘ Yes È No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to filesuch reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes È No ‘
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See
definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer È
Accelerated filer ‘
Non-accelerated filer ‘
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in thisfiling:U.S. GAAP È
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued
Other ‘by the International Accounting Standards Board ‘
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item theregistrant has elected to follow. ‘ Item 17 ‘ Item 18
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). ‘ Yes È No

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PagePART I
Item 1.

Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2Item 2.

Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2Item 3.

Key Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2Item 4.

Information on the Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17

Item 4A.

Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30

Item 5.

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30

Item 6.

Directors, Senior Management and Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

71

Item 7.

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

89

Item 8.

Financial Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

89

Item 9.

The Offer and Listing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

90

Item 10.

Additional Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91

Item 11.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

108

Item 12.

Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

125PART II
Item 13.

Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127

Item 14.

Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127

Item 15.

Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127

Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127

Item 16B.

Code of Ethics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127

Item 16C.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

128

Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

129

Item 16E.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

129

Item 16F.

Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

130

Item 16G. Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

130

Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

131

PART III
Item 17.

Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

132

Item 18.

Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

132

Item 19.

Exhibits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

133

Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-1

1

As used in this annual report, references to “Company”, “Nomura”, “Nomura Group”, “we”, “us” and“our” are to Nomura Holdings, Inc. and, except as the context otherwise requires, its consolidated subsidiaries.
As part of certain line items in Nomura’s financial statements and information included in this annual report,
references to “NHI” are to Nomura Holdings, Inc.
As used in this annual report, “yen” or “¥” means the lawful currency of Japan, and “dollar” or “$”means the lawful currency of the United States of America (“U.S.”).
As used in this annual report, “ADS” means an American Depositary Share, currently representing one
share of the Company’s common stock, and “ADR” means an American Depositary Receipt evidencing one ormore ADSs. See “Rights of ADR Holders” under Item 10.B of this annual report.
Amounts shown in this annual report have been rounded to the nearest indicated digit unless otherwise
specified. In tables and graphs with rounded figures, sums may not add up due to rounding.

PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
A. Selected Financial Data
The following table shows selected financial information as of and for the years ended March 31, 2009,2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 which is derived from our consolidated financial statements included in this annual
report. These financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”). Certain reclassifications of previously reported amounts have been made to conform tothe current period presentation.

2

The selected consolidated financial information set forth below should be read in conjunction with Item 5.
“Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” in this annual report and our consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto included in this annual report.
Millions of yen, except per share data and percentages
Year ended March 31
2010
2011
2012

2009

Statement of income data:
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Net income (loss) attributable tononcontrolling interests(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to Nomura
Holdings, Inc. (“NHI”) shareholders(1) . . . . . . .
Balance sheet data (period end):
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total NHI shareholders’ equity(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Per share data:
Net income (loss) attributable to NHI
shareholders—basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to NHI
shareholders—diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total NHI shareholders’ equity(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends in USD(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average number of shares outstanding(in thousands)(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on equity(5): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥664,511 ¥ 1,356,751
351,884
205,929
312,627
1,150,822
1,092,892
1,045,575(780,265)
105,247(70,854)
37,161¥ (709,411) ¥68,086(1,219)288¥ (708,192) ¥67,798¥24,837,848
1,539,396
1,551,546
321,765¥32,230,428
2,126,929
2,133,014
594,493¥(364.69) ¥

21.68

$

(366.16)590.9925.50
0.26 $

21.59
579.708.00
0.09

1,941,907(40.2)%

3,126,790
3.7%

2013

¥ 1,385,492
254,794
1,130,698
1,037,443
93,25561,330¥31,925¥ 1,851,760
315,901
1,535,859
1,450,902
84,95758,903¥26,054¥ 2,079,943
266,312
1,813,631
1,575,901
237,730
132,039¥ 105,691

3,264

14,471(1,543)¥

28,661¥

11,583¥

107,234¥36,692,990
2,082,754
2,091,636
594,493¥35,697,312
2,107,241
2,389,137
594,493¥37,942,439
2,294,371
2,318,983
594,493

¥

7.90

¥

3.18

¥

29.04

$

7.86
578.40
8.00
0.10

$

3.14
575.20
6.00
0.07

$

28.37
618.278.00
0.08

3,627,799
1.4%

3,643,481
0.6%

3,692,796
4.9%

Notes:(1) On April 1, 2009, we adopted new guidance for the accounting and reporting for noncontrolling interests. In the abovetable, this guidance has been retrospectively applied to the amounts as of and for the years ended March 31, 2009.
(2) Calculated using the number of shares outstanding at year end.
(3) Calculated using the yen-dollar exchange rate of the respective fiscal year end date, the noon buying rate in New York
City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York.
(4) The number shown is used to calculate basic earnings per share.
(5) Calculated as Net income (loss) attributable to NHI shareholders divided by average Total NHI shareholders’ equity.

3Foreign Exchange
Fluctuations in exchange rates between the Japanese yen and U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar
equivalent of the yen price of our shares and ADSs and the U.S. dollar amounts received on conversion of cash
dividends. The following table provides the noon buying rates for Japanese yen in New York City for cabletransfers as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, expressed in Japanese yen
per $1.00.
Year ended March 31

High

Low

Average(1)Year end

2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

110.48100.71
94.68
85.26
96.16

87.80
86.12
78.74
75.72
77.41

100.85
92.49
85.00
78.86
83.26

99.15
93.40
82.76
82.41
94.16

Calendar year 2013

High

Low

January . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
91.28
February . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93.64
March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
96.16
April . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
99.61
May . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103.52
June (through June 21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.15

86.92
91.38
93.32
92.96
97.28
94.29

(1) Average rate represents the average of rates available on the last business day of each month during theyear.
The noon buying rate for Japanese yen on June 21, 2013 was $1.00 = ¥97.48
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness.
Not applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds.
Not applicable.

4

D. Risk Factors.
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. If any of therisks described below actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could
be adversely affected. In that event, the trading prices of our shares could decline, and you may lose all or part ofyour investment. In addition to the risks listed below, risks not currently known to us or that we now deem
immaterial may also harm us and affect your investment.
Our business may be materially affected by financial markets, economic conditions and market
fluctuations in Japan and elsewhere around the world
In recent years, market trends and economic conditions have been changing in Japan and around the world.
The global financial crisis that originated with the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holding Inc. (“Lehman
Brothers”) in 2008 which affected not only the global securities market but also the financial services industry as
participants, and it also affected economic activity as a whole, especially in developed countries, including Japan.
Also in 2011, financial problems in the U.S. and the worsening of financial issues in the peripheral countries of
the Eurozone, including Greece adversely influenced major global financial markets.
The global economy subsequently showed trends of modest recovery from the middle of 2012 due to factors
such as monetary easing policies enacted by Japan and other major industrialized countries and efforts by theEuropean Central Bank aimed at maintaining the structure of the Euro. Our business and revenues may beaffected by these changes in the Japanese and global economic environments and financial markets. However, it
is uncertain whether this trend will continue, and there are continuing signs of market volatility, including
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices in Japan and globally.
In addition, not only purely economic factors but also future wars, acts of terrorism, economic or politicalsanctions, pandemics, forecast of geopolitical risks and geopolitical events which have actually occurred, natural
disasters or other similar events could have an effect on financial markets and economies of each country. For
example, economic activity as a whole including financial transactions diminished due to the Great East Japan
Earthquake in March 2011 because of the accidents at the nuclear power plants and the resulting power shortages
and supply line disruptions. As a result, the Japanese economy and our business were severely affected.
If events like these occur, a market/economic downturns may be extended for long periods of time, which
can adversely affect our business and can result in substantial losses. Even in the absence of a prolonged market/
economic downturn, changes from market volatility or governmental fiscal and monetary policy changes in eachcountry and region where we conduct business and other changes in the business environment may adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The following are certain risks related to thefinancial markets and economic conditions for our specific businesses.
Our brokerage and asset management revenues may decline
A market downturn could result in a decline in the revenues generated by our intermediary business becauseof a decline in the volume and value of securities that we broker for our clients. Also, with regard to our asset
management business, in most cases, we charge fees for managing our clients’ portfolios that are based on thevalue of their portfolios. A market downturn that reduces the value of our clients’ portfolios may increase theamount of withdrawals or reduce the amount of new investments in these portfolios, and would reduce therevenue we receive from our asset management businesses.
Our investment banking revenues may decline
Changes in financial or economic conditions would likely affect the number and size of transactions forwhich we provide securities underwriting, financial advisory and other investment banking services. Ourinvestment banking revenues, which include fees from these services, are directly related to the number and size5

of the transactions in which we participate and would therefore decrease if there are financial and market changes
unfavorable to our investment banking business and our clients. For example, due in part to the slowdown in
financing activities resulting primarily from the worsened and prolonged impact of the European sovereign debt
crisis in 2011, our Investment Banking net revenue for the year ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 decreased by
15.9% and 15.0% from the previous years respectively.
Our electronic trading business revenues may decline
Electronic trading is essential for our business in order to execute trades faster with fewer resources.
Utilizing these system allows us to provide an efficient execution platform and on-line content and tools to ourclients via exchanges or other automated trading facilities. Revenue from our electronic trading, which includes
trading commissions and bid-offer spreads from these services, are directly correlated with the number and sizeof the transactions in which we participate and would therefore decrease if there are financial or market changes
that would cause our clients to trade less frequently or in a smaller size. In addition, the use of electronic trading
has increased across capital markets products and has put pressure on trading commissions and bid-offer spreads
in our industry due to the increased competition of our electronic trading business. Although trade volumes may
increase due to the availability of electronic trading, this may not be sufficient to offset margin erosion in our
execution business, leading to a potential decline in revenue generated from this business. We continue to invest
in developing technologies to provide an efficient trading platform; however, we may fail to maximize returns onthese investments due to this increased pressure on lowering margins.
We may incur significant losses from our trading and investment activities
We maintain large trading and investment positions in fixed income, equity and other markets, both for ourown account and for the purpose of facilitating our clients’ trades. Our positions consist of various types ofassets, including financial derivatives transactions in equity, interest rate, currency, credit, commodity and othermarkets, as well as loans and real estate. Fluctuations in the markets where these assets are traded can adversely
affect the value of these assets. To the extent that we own assets, or have long positions, a market downturn could
result in losses if the value of these long positions decreases. Furthermore, to the extent that we have sold assets
we do not own, or have short positions, an upturn in the prices of the assets could expose us to potentiallysignificant losses. Although we have worked to mitigate these position risks with a variety of hedging techniques,
these market movements could result in losses. We can incur losses if the financial system is overly stressed andthe markets move in a way we have not anticipated.
Our businesses have been and may continue to be affected by changes in market volatility levels. Certain of
our trading businesses such as trading and arbitrage opportunities depend on market volatility. Lower volatility
may lead to a decrease in business opportunities which may affect the results of these businesses. On the other
hand, higher volatility, while it can increase trading volumes and spreads, also increases risk as measured by
Value-at-Risk (“VaR”) and may expose us to higher risks in connection with our market-making and proprietarybusinesses or cause us to reduce outstanding positions or size of these businesses in order to avoid increasing our
VaR.
Furthermore, we commit capital to take relatively large positions for underwriting or warehousing assets tofacilitate certain capital market transactions. Also, we structure and take positions in pilot funds for developing
financial investment products and invest seed money to set up and support financial investment products. We
may incur significant losses from these positions in the event of significant market fluctuations.
In addition, if we are the party providing collateral in a transaction, significant declines in the value of thecollateral or a requirement to provide additional collateral due to our lowered creditworthiness (by way of alowered credit rating or otherwise) can increase our costs and reduce our profitability. On the other hand, if weare the party receiving collateral from our clients and counterparties, such declines may also affect on our
profitability by changing the business. Assuming a one-notch and two-notch downgrade of our credit ratings
6

on March 31, 2013, absent other changes, we estimate that the aggregate fair value of assets that will be required
to post as additional collateral in connection with our derivative contracts would have been approximately¥31.0 billion and ¥156.7 billion, respectively.
Holding large and concentrated positions of securities and other assets may expose us to large losses
Holding a large amount of securities concentrated in specific assets can expose us to large losses in ourbusinesses such as market-making, block trading, underwriting, asset securitization, acquiring newly-issued
convertible bonds through third-party allotment or solution businesses matching with client’s needs. We havecommitted substantial amounts of capital to these businesses. This often requires us to take large positions in the
securities of a particular issuer or issuers in a particular industry, country or region. We generally have higher
exposure to those issuers engaged in financial services businesses, including commercial banks, broker-dealers,
clearing houses, exchanges and investment companies. There may also be cases where we hold relatively large
amounts of securities by issuers in particular countries or regions due to the business we conduct with our clientsor our counterparties. In addition, we may incur substantial losses due to market fluctuations on asset-backed
securities such as residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities.
Extended market declines can reduce liquidity and lead to material losses
Extended market declines can reduce the level of market activity and the liquidity of the assets traded in themarket for our business, which may make it difficult to sell, hedge or value such assets which we hold. Also, incase a market fails in pricing such assets, it will be difficult to estimate the value of the assets. If we cannot
properly close out or hedge our associated positions in a timely manner or in full, particularly with respect toover-the-counter derivatives, we may incur substantial losses. Further, if the liquidity of a market significantly
decreases and the market price of own position is not formed, it could lead to unanticipated losses.
Our hedging strategies may not prevent losses
We use a variety of instruments and strategies to hedge our exposure to various types of risk. If our hedging
strategies are not effective, we may incur losses. We base many of our hedging strategies on historical trading
patterns and correlations. For example, if we hold an asset, we may hedge this position by taking another asset
which has, historically, moved in a direction that would offset a change in value of the former asset. However,historical trading patterns and correlations may not continue, as seen in the case of past financial crises, and these
hedging strategies may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure because we are exposed to all typesof risk in a variety of market environments.
Our risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective in managing market risk
Our policies and procedures to identify, monitor and manage risks may not be fully effective. Althoughsome of our methods of managing risk are based upon observed historical behavior of market data, the movementof each data in future financial market may not be the same as which was observed in the past. As a result, we
may suffer large losses through unexpected future risk exposures. Other risk management methods that we use
also rely on our evaluation of information regarding markets, clients or other matters, which is publicly available
or otherwise accessible by us. This information may not be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated,
and we may be unable to properly assess our risks, and thereby suffer large losses. Furthermore, certain factors,
such as market volatility, may render our risk evaluation model unsuitable for a new market environment. In such
event, we may become unable to evaluate or otherwise manage our risks adequately.
Market risk may increase other risks that we face
In addition to the potentially adverse effects on our businesses described above, market risk could
exacerbate other risks that we face. For example, the risks inherent in financial products developed throughfinancial engineering and innovation may be increased by market risk.
7

Also, if we incur substantial trading losses caused by our exposure to market risk, our need for liquidity
could rise sharply while our access to cash may be impaired as a result of market perception of our credit risk.
Furthermore, in a market downturn, our clients and counterparties could incur substantial losses of theirown, thereby weakening their financial condition and, as a result, increasing our credit risk exposure to them.
We may have to recognize impairment charges with regard to the amount of goodwill, tangible andintangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheets
We have purchased all or a part of the equity interests in, or operations from, certain other companies inorder to pursue our business expansion, and expect to continue to do so when and as we deem appropriate. We
account for certain of those and similar purchases and acquisitions in conformity with U.S. GAAP as a businesscombination by allocating our acquisition costs to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and recording theremaining amount as goodwill. We also possess tangible and intangible assets besides those stated above.
We may have to recognize impairment charges, as well as profits and losses along associated withsubsequent transactions, with regard to the amount of goodwill, tangible and intangible assets and if recorded,
they may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and jeopardize our financial condition
Liquidity, or having ready access to cash, is essential to our businesses. In addition to maintaining a readily
available cash position, we seek to secure ample liquidity through repurchase and securities lending transactions,access to long-term debt, issuance of mid/long-term debt, diversification of our short-term funding sources suchas commercial paper, and by holding a portfolio of highly liquid assets. We bear the risk that we may loseliquidity under certain circumstances, including the following:
We may be unable to access the debt capital markets
We depend on continuous access to the short-term credit markets and the debt capital markets to finance our
day-to-day operations. An inability to raise money in the long-term or short-term debt markets, or to engage inrepurchase agreements and securities lending, could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. For
example, lenders could refuse to extend the credit necessary for us to conduct our business based on theirassessment of our long-term or short-term financial prospects if:•

we incur large trading losses,•

the level of our business activity decreases due to a market downturn, or•

regulatory authorities take significant action against us.

In addition to the above, our ability to borrow in the debt markets could also be impaired by factors that are
not specific to us, such as increases in banks’ nonperforming loans which reduce their lending capacity, a severe
disruption of the financial and credit markets which, among others, can lead to widening credit spreads andthereby increase our borrowing costs, or negative views about the general prospects for the investment banking,brokerage or financial services industries generally.
We may be unable to access the short-term debt markets
We issue commercial paper and short-term debt instruments as a source of unsecured short-term funding of
our operations. Our liquidity depends largely on our ability to refinance these borrowings on a continuous basis.
Investors who hold our outstanding commercial paper and other short-term debt instruments have no obligation
to provide refinancing when the outstanding instruments mature. We may be unable to obtain short-term
financing from banks to make up any shortfall.
8

We may be unable to sell assets
If we are unable to borrow in the debt capital markets or if our cash balances decline significantly, we willneed to liquidate our assets or take other actions in order to meet our maturing liabilities. In volatile or uncertain
market environments, overall market liquidity may decline. In a time of reduced market liquidity, we may be unable
to sell some of our assets, which may adversely affect our liquidity, or we may have to sell assets at depressed
prices, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Our ability to sell our assets
may be impaired by other market participants seeking to sell similar assets into the market at the same time.
Lowering of our credit ratings could increase our borrowing costs
Our borrowing costs and our access to the debt capital markets depend significantly on our credit ratings.
Rating agencies may reduce or withdraw their ratings or place us on “credit watch” with negative implications.
For example, on March 15, 2012, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded our senior debt rating from Baa2 to
Baa3. Although the impact of this downgrade has been limited, future downgrades could increase our borrowing
costs and limit our access to the capital markets. This, in turn, could reduce our earnings and adversely affect our
liquidity. Further, other factors which are not specific to us may increase our funding costs, such as negative
market perception of Japan’s fiscal soundness.
Event risk may cause losses in our trading and investment assets as well as market and liquidity risk
Event risk refers to potential losses in value we may suffer through unpredictable events that cause large
unexpected market price movements. These include not only significant events such as the terrorist attacks in the
U.S. on September 11, 2001, U.S. subprime issues since 2007, the global financial and credit crisis in the autumn
of 2008, the Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011 and fiscal problems in the U.S. and European countries
which became apparent starting the same year, but also more specifically the following types of events that could
cause losses on our trading and investment assets:•

sudden and significant reductions in credit ratings with regard to our trading and investment assets bymajor rating agencies,•

sudden changes in trading, tax, accounting, laws and other related rules which may make our trading
strategy obsolete, less competitive or not workable, or•an unexpected failure in a corporate transaction in which we participate resulting in our not receiving
the consideration we should have received, as well as bankruptcy, deliberate acts of fraud, andadministrative penalty with respect to the issuers of our trading and investment assets.

We may be exposed to losses when third parties that are indebted to us do not perform their obligations
Our counterparties are from time to time indebted to us as a result of transactions or contracts, includingloans, commitments to lend, other contingent liabilities, and derivatives transactions such as swaps and options.
We may incur material losses when our counterparties default on their obligations to us due to their filing forbankruptcy, deterioration in their creditworthiness, lack of liquidity, operational failure, an economic or politicalevent, or other reasons.
Credit risk may also arise from:•holding securities issued by third parties, or•the execution of securities, futures, currency or derivative trades that fail to settle at the required time
due to nondelivery by the counterparty, such as monoline insurers (financial guarantors) which arecounterparties in credit default swap contracts, or systems failure by clearing agents, exchanges,
clearing houses or other financial infrastructure.
9

Problems related to third party credit risk may include the following:
Defaults by a large financial institution could adversely affect the financial markets generally and us
specifically
The commercial soundness of many financial institutions is closely interrelated as a result of credit, trading,clearing or other relationships among the institutions. As a result, concern about the credit standing of, or adefault by, certain institution could lead to significant liquidity problems or losses in, or defaults by, otherinstitutions. This may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as clearing agencies, clearing houses, banks,
securities firms and exchanges, with which we interact on a daily basis. Actual defaults, increases in perceived
default risk and other similar events could arise in the future and could have an adverse effect on the financial
markets and on us. Our finance operations may be impacted if major financial institutions, Japanese or otherwise,
fail or experience severe liquidity or solvency problems.
There can be no assurance as to the accuracy of the information about, or the sufficiency of the collateral weuse in managing, our credit risk
We regularly review our credit exposure to specific clients or counterparties and to specific countries andregions that we believe may present credit concerns. Default risk, however, may arise from events orcircumstances that are difficult to detect, such as account-rigging and fraud. We may also fail to receive full
information with respect to the risks of a counterparty. In addition, in cases where we have extended credit
against collateral, we may fall into a deficiency in value in the collateral if sudden declines in market values
reduce the value of our collateral.
Our clients and counterparties may be unable to perform their obligations to us as a result of political or
economic conditions
Country, regional and political risks are components of credit risk, as well as market risk. Political or
economic pressures in a country or region, including those arising from local market disruptions or currency
crises, may adversely affect the ability of clients or counterparties located in that country or region to obtain
credit or foreign exchange, and therefore to perform their obligations owed to us.
The financial services industry faces intense competition
Our businesses are intensely competitive, and expect to remain so. We compete on the basis of a number offactors, including transaction execution capability, our products and services, innovation, reputation and price.
We have experienced intense price competition, particularly in brokerage, investment banking and otherbusinesses.
Competition with commercial banks, commercial bank-owned securities subsidiaries and non-Japanese firms
in the Japanese market is increasing
Since the late 1990s, the financial services sector in Japan has been undergoing deregulation. In accordancewith the amendments to the Securities and Exchange Law (which has been renamed as the Financial Instruments
and Exchange Act (the “FIEA”) since September 30, 2007), effective from December 1, 2004, banks and certain
other financial institutions became able to enter into the securities brokerage business. In addition, in accordancewith the amendments to the FIEA effective from June 1, 2009, firewalls between commercial banks andsecurities firms were deregulated. Therefore, as our competitors will be able to cooperate more closely with theiraffiliated commercial banks, banks and other types of financial services firms can compete with us to a greater
degree than they could before deregulation in the areas of financing and investment trusts. Among others,
securities subsidiaries of commercial banks and non-Japanese firms have been affecting our market shares in thesales and trading, investment banking and retail businesses.
10Increased consolidation, business alliance and cooperation in the financial services industry mean increased
competition for us
There has been substantial consolidation and convergence among companies in the financial services
industry. In particular, a number of large commercial banks and other broad-based financial services firms haveestablished or acquired broker-dealers or have consolidated with other financial institutions. Recently, these othersecurities companies and commercial banks develop their business linkage and have the ability to offer a wide
range of products, including loans, deposit-taking, insurance, brokerage, asset management and investmentbanking services within their group, which may enhance their competitive position compared with us. They also
have the ability to supplement their investment banking and brokerage businesses with commercial banking andother financial services revenues in an effort to gain market share. In addition, alliances regardless of the existinggroups are seen. These financial groups will further enhance their synergies between commercial banks andsecurities companies, and eventually improve their profitability. Our market shares may decrease if these large
consolidated firms expand their businesses.
Our global business strategies may not result in the anticipated outcome due to competition with otherfinancial services firms in international markets and the failure to realize the full benefit of management
resource reallocation
We believe there are significant opportunities in the international markets, but there is also significant
competition associated with such opportunities. In order to take advantage of these opportunities, we will have tocompete successfully with financial services firms based in important non-Japanese markets, including the U.S.,
Europe and Asia. Under such competitive environment, as a means to bolster our international operations, we
acquired certain Lehman Brothers operations in Europe, the Middle East and Asia in 2008 and we have invested
significant management resources to rebuild and expand our operations in these regions and the U.S. After theacquisition, however, the global economy started to slow down, and regulation/supervision has been tighteningaround the world. In light of this challenging business environment, we endeavor to reallocate our management
resources to optimize our global operations and thereby improve our profitability. However, failure to realize thefull benefits of these efforts may adversely affect our global businesses, financial condition and results ofoperations.
Our business is subject to substantial legal, regulatory and reputational risks
Substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have a material financial effecton us or cause reputational harm to us, which in turn could seriously damage our business prospects and resultsof operations. Also, material changes in regulations applicable to us or to our market could adversely affect ourbusiness.
Our exposure to legal liability is significant
We face significant legal risks in our businesses. These risks include liability under securities or other laws
in connection with securities underwriting and offering transactions, liability arising from the purchase or sale ofany securities or other products, disputes over the terms and conditions of complex trading arrangements or thevalidity of contracts for our transactions and legal claims concerning our other businesses.
During a prolonged market downturn or upon the occurrence of an event that adversely affects the market,
we would expect claims against us to increase. We may also face significant litigation. The cost of defending
such litigation may be substantial and our involvement in litigation may damage our reputation. In addition, evenlegal transactions might be subject to adverse public reaction according to the particular details of suchtransactions. These risks may be difficult to assess or quantify and their existence and magnitude may remain
unknown for substantial periods of time.

11Extensive regulation of our businesses limits our activities and may subject us to significant penalties andlosses
The financial services industry is subject to extensive regulation. We are subject to regulation by
governmental and self-regulatory organizations in Japan and in virtually all other jurisdictions in which we
operate, and such governmental and regulatory scrutiny may increase as our operations expand or as lawschange. These regulations are broadly designed to ensure the stability of financial systems and the integrity of thefinancial markets and financial institutions, and to protect clients and other third parties who deal with us, andoften limit our activities, through net capital, client protection and market conduct requirements. Although wehave policies in place to prevent violations of such laws and regulations, we may not always be able to prevent
violations, and we could be fined, prohibited from engaging in some of our business activities, ordered to
improve our internal governance procedures or be subject to revocation of our license to conduct business. Our
reputation could also suffer from the adverse publicity that any administrative or judicial sanction against us may
create. As a result of any such sanction, we may lose business opportunities for a period of time, even after the
sanction is lifted, if and to the extent that our clients, especially public institutions, decide not to engage us fortheir financial transactions.
Tightening of regulations applicable to the financial system and financial industry could adversely affect ourbusiness, financial condition and operating results
If regulations that apply to our businesses are introduced, modified or removed, we could be adversely
affected directly or through resulting changes in market conditions. The impact of such developments could
make it uneconomic for us to continue to conduct all or certain of our businesses, or could cause us to incur
significant costs to adjust to such changes.
In particular, various reforms to financial regulatory frameworks, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) in the U.S. and various proposals to strengthen
financial regulation in the European Union and the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), have been put in place. The exact
details of the implementation of these proposals and its impact on us will depend on the final regulations as they
become ultimately adopted by various governmental agencies and oversight boards. For more information aboutsuch regulations, see “Regulation” under Item 4.B. of this annual report.
Changes in regulations applicable to accounting standards, consolidated regulatory capital adequacy rules
and liquidity ratios could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results ofoperations. For example, in March 2012, Japan’s Financial Services Agency (“FSA”) published the “Partial
Revision of Public Notice on Consolidated Capital Adequacy of Final Designated Parent Company” in order to
respond to the Basel III measures announced by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BaselCommittee”), and beginning on March 31, 2013, the amended Notice has been gradually phased in. The full
implementation of such new measures may cause our capital adequacy ratio calculated pursuant to such newmeasures to decrease below the levels at the end of March 2013 or may require us to liquidate assets, raise
additional capital or otherwise restrict our business activities in a manner that could increase our funding costs or
could otherwise adversely affect our operating or financing activities or the interests of our shareholders.
Furthermore, the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) and the Basel Committee have announced that they will
annually update the list of global systemically important banks (“G-SIBs”) identified by financial regulators andadditional regulatory capital requirements imposed on those G-SIBs. Additionally, the G20 Finance Ministers
and Central Bank Governors requested the FSB and the Basel Committee to expand the G-SIB framework todomestic systemically important banks (“D-SIBs”), and in October 2012, the Basel Committee developed andpublished a set of principles on the assessment methodology and higher loss absorbency requirements for DSIBs. The costs and impact on us as described above may further increase if we are identified as a G-SIB or a DSIB in the future.

12Deferred tax assets may be impacted due to a change in business condition or in laws and regulations,
resulting in an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
We recognize deferred tax assets on our consolidated balance sheets as a possible benefit of tax relief in the
future. If we experience or foresee a deteriorating business condition, a tax reform (such as a reduction of
corporate tax rate) or a change in accounting standards in the future, we may reduce the deferred tax assets thenrecognized in our consolidated balance sheets. As a result, it could adversely affect our operating results andfinancial condition.
Misconduct or fraud by an employee, director or officer, or any third party, could occur, and our
reputation in the market and our relationships with clients could be harmed
We face the risk that misconduct by an employee, director or officer, or any third party, could occur which
may adversely affect our business. Misconduct by an employee, director or officer can include, for example,
entering into transactions in excess of authorized limits, acceptance of risks that exceed our limits, orconcealment of unauthorized or unsuccessful activities. The misconduct could also involve, for example, theimproper use or disclosure of our or our clients’ confidential information, such as insider trading, which could
result in regulatory sanctions, legal liability and serious reputational or financial damage to us.
In July 2012, Japan’s Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (“SESC”) issued arecommendation to the Prime Minister of Japan and the Commissioner of the FSA to bring an administrative
action against Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. (“NSC”), the Company’s subsidiary, based on the finding that NSC
had failed to take necessary and appropriate measures in its business operations to prevent illegal trading withregard to the management of non-public, corporate-related information in connection with public offerings of
new shares. In accordance with the SESC’s recommendation, in August 2012, the FSA issued a business
improvement order to NSC. In response to the order, NSC has implemented a series of measures designed toaddress the issues identified and is working across its entire operations to prevent similar incidents fromoccurring in the future.
Although we have precautions in place to detect and prevent any such misconduct and have recently taken
steps to enhance such precautions, the measures we implement may not be effective in all cases, and we may notalways be able to detect or deter misconduct by an employee, director or officer. If any administrative or judicial
sanction is issued against us as a result of such misconduct, we may lose business opportunities for a period oftime, even after the sanction is lifted, if and to the extent that our clients, especially public institutions, decide not
to engage us for their financial transactions.
Third parties may also engage in fraudulent activities, including devising a fraudulent scheme to induce ourinvestment, loans, guarantee or any other form of financial commitment, both direct and indirect. Because of thebroad range of businesses that we engage in and the large number of third parties with whom we deal in our dayto-day business operations, such fraud or any other misconduct may be difficult to prevent or detect.
We may not be able to recover the financial losses caused by such activities and our reputation may also bedamaged by such activities.
A failure to identify and address conflicts of interest appropriately could adversely affect our businesses
We are a global financial services firm providing a wide range of products and services to a diverse group ofclients, including individuals, corporations, financial institutions and governmental institutions. As such, we facepotential conflicts of interest in the ordinary course of our business. Potential conflicts can occur when ourservices to a particular client or our own interests conflict, or are perceived to conflict, with the interest ofanother client. Potential conflicts can also occur where non-public information is not appropriately restricted or
shared within the firm. While we have extensive internal procedures and controls designed to identify and13address conflicts of interest, a failure, or a perceived failure, to identify, disclose and appropriately address
conflicts could adversely affect our reputation and the willingness of current or potential clients to do businesswith us. In addition, potential conflicts could give rise to regulatory scrutiny, enforcement action or litigation.
Our business is subject to various operational risks
Types of operational risk we face include the following, each of which could result in financial losses,
disruption in our business, litigation from third parties, regulatory/supervisory actions, restrictions or penalties,
and/or damage to our reputation:•

failure to execute, confirm or settle securities transactions,•failure by our officers or employees to perform proper administrative activities prescribed in our regularprocedures, such as placing erroneous orders to securities exchanges,•

the destruction of or damage to our facilities or systems, or other impairment of our ability to conductbusiness, arising from the impacts of disasters or acts of terrorism which are beyond our anticipation andthe scope of our contingency plan,•the disruption of our business due to pandemic diseases or illnesses or•suspension or malfunction of internal or third party systems, or unauthorized access, misuse, computerviruses and cyber-attacks affecting such systems.

Our businesses rely on the secure processing, storage, transmission and reception of confidential andproprietary information in our computer systems. Although we continue to monitor and update our security
system, we recognize the increasing risk from the continuously evolving nature of cyber threats. As cybersecurity threats become more sophisticated, we may be required to expend significant additional resources tomodify our systems, and if any of our protective measures are not adequate, it is possible that such attacks maylead to significant breaches in the future.
Unauthorized disclosure of personal information held by us may adversely affect our businessWe keep and manage personal information obtained from clients in connection with our business. In recent
years, there have been many reported cases of personal information and records in the possession of corporations
and institutions being improperly accessed or disclosed.
Although we exercise care in protecting the confidentiality of personal information and take steps tosafeguard such information in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, if any material
unauthorized disclosure of personal information does occur, our business could be adversely affected in a numberof ways. For example, we could be subject to complaints and lawsuits for damages from clients if they are
adversely affected as a result of the release of their personal information. In addition, we could incur additional
expenses associated with changing our security systems, either voluntarily or in response to administrative
guidance or other regulatory initiatives, or in connection with public relations campaigns designed to prevent or
mitigate damage to our corporate or brand image or reputation. Any damage to our reputation caused by such
unauthorized disclosure could lead to a decline in new clients and/or a loss of existing clients, as well as toincreased costs and expenses in dealing with any such problems.
The Company is a holding company and depends on payments from subsidiaries
The Company heavily depends on dividends, distributions and other payments from subsidiaries to makepayments on the Company’s obligations. Regulatory and other legal restrictions, such as those under theCompanies Act of Japan, may limit the Company’s ability to transfer funds freely, either to or from theCompany’s subsidiaries. In particular, many of the Company’s subsidiaries, including the Company’s brokerdealer subsidiaries, are subject to laws and regulations, including regulatory capital requirements, that authorize
regulatory bodies to block or reduce the flow of funds to the parent holding company, or that prohibit such14

transfers altogether in certain circumstances. For example, Nomura Securities Co., Ltd., Nomura Securities
International, Inc., Nomura International plc and Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited, our main brokerdealer subsidiaries, are subject to regulatory capital requirements that could limit the transfer of funds to theCompany. These laws and regulations may hinder the Company’s ability to access funds needed to makepayments on the Company’s obligations.
We may not be able to realize gains we expect, and may even suffer losses, on our private equity
investments
We engage in private equity businesses in and outside of Japan through certain consolidated subsidiaries. A
decline in the fair values of our investment positions, which could arise from deteriorating business performanceof investee companies or any deterioration in the market conditions of these sectors, may cause material losses tous. Further, our inability to dispose of our private equity investments at the level and time we may wish could
have a material impact on our operating results and financial condition.
We may not be able to realize gains we expect, and may even suffer losses, on our investments in equity
securities and non-trading debt securities
We hold substantial investments in equity securities and non-trading debt securities. Under U.S. GAAP,
depending on market conditions, we may record significant unrealized gains or losses on our investments inequity securities and debt securities, which would have a substantial impact on our consolidated statements ofincome. Depending on the conditions of the markets, we may not be able to dispose of these equity securities anddebt securities when we would like to do so, as quickly as we may wish or at the desired values.
Equity investments in affiliates and other investees accounted for under the equity method in ourconsolidated financial statements may decline significantly over a period of time and result in us incurring
an impairment loss
We have affiliates and investees accounted for under the equity method in our consolidated financial
statements and whose shares are publicly traded. Under U.S. GAAP, if there is a decline in the fair value, i.e., themarket price, of the shares we hold in such affiliates over a period of time, and we determine that the decline isother-than-temporary, then we record an impairment loss for the applicable fiscal period.
We may face an outflow of clients’ assets due to losses of cash reserve funds or bonds we offered
We offer many types of products to meet various needs of our clients with different risk profiles. Cashreserve funds, such as money management funds and money reserve funds are categorized as low-risk products.
Such cash reserve funds may fall below par value as a result of losses caused by the rise of interest rates or thewithdrawals or defaults on bonds contained in the portfolio. In addition, bonds that we offer may default or
experience delays in their obligation to pay interest and/or principal. Such losses in the products we offer may
result in the loss of client confidence and lead to an outflow of client assets from our custody.
Because of daily price range limitations under Japanese stock exchange rules, you may not be able to sell
your shares of the Company’s common stock at a particular price on any particular trading day, or at all
Stock prices on Japanese stock exchanges are determined on a real-time basis by the equilibrium between
bids and offers. These exchanges are order-driven markets without specialists or market makers to guide priceformation. For the purpose of protecting investors from excessive volatility, these exchanges set daily upwardand downward price fluctuation limits for each stock, based on the previous day’s closing price. Althoughtransactions may continue at the upward or downward limit price if the limit price is reached on a particular
trading day, no transactions may take place outside these limits. Consequently, an investor wishing to sell at a
price above or below the relevant daily limit may not be able to sell his or her shares at such price on a particular
trading day, or at all.
15

Under Japan’s unit share system, holders of the Company’s shares constituting less than one unit are
subject to transfer, voting and other restrictions
The Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as permitted under the Companies Act of Japan (“CompaniesAct”), provide that 100 shares of the Company’s stock constitute one “unit.” The Companies Act imposessignificant restrictions and limitations on holdings of shares that constitute less than a whole unit. Holders ofshares constituting less than one unit do not have the right to vote or any other rights relating to voting. Under theunit share system, any holders of shares constituting less than a unit may at anytime request the Company topurchase their shares. Also, holders of shares constituting less than a unit may request the Company to sell themsuch number of shares that the Company may have as may be necessary to raise such holder’s share ownership toa whole unit. Shares constituting less than a unit are transferable under the Companies Act, but may not be tradedon any Japanese stock exchange.
As a holder of ADSs, you will have fewer rights than a shareholder has and you will have to act throughthe depositary to exercise these rights
The rights of shareholders under Japanese law to take actions including voting their shares, receiving
dividends and distributions, bringing derivative actions, examining the company’s accounting books and records
and exercising appraisal rights are available only to holders of record. Because the depositary, through its
custodian agent, is the record holder of the shares underlying the ADSs, only the depositary can exercise thoserights in connection with the deposited shares. The depositary will make efforts to vote the shares underlying
your ADSs as instructed by you and will pay you the dividends and distributions collected from the Company.
However, in your capacity as an ADS holder, you will not be able to bring a derivative action, examine theCompany’s accounting books or records or exercise appraisal rights except through the depositary.
Rights of shareholders under Japanese law may be more limited than under the laws of other jurisdictions
The Companies Act and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Regulations of the Board of Directors
govern the Company’s corporate affairs. Legal principles relating to such matters as the validity of corporate
procedures, directors’ and executive officers’ fiduciary duties and shareholders’ rights may be different fromthose that would apply to a non-Japanese company. Shareholders’ rights under Japanese law may not be as
extensive as shareholders’ rights under the laws of other jurisdictions, including jurisdictions within the U.S. You
may have more difficulty in asserting your rights as a shareholder than you would as a shareholder of acorporation organized in another jurisdiction.
The Company’s shareholders of record on a record date may not receive the dividend they anticipate
The customary dividend payout practice of publicly listed companies in Japan may significantly differ fromthat widely followed or otherwise deemed necessary or fair in foreign markets. The Company’s dividend payout
practice is no exception. The Company ultimately determines whether the Company will make any dividend
payment to shareholders of record as of a record date and such determination is made only after such record date.
For the foregoing reasons, the Company’s shareholders of record as of a record date may not receive thedividends they anticipate. Furthermore, the Company does not announce any dividend forecasts.
It may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the U.S. upon the Company or theCompany’s directors or executive officers, or to enforce against the Company or those persons judgments
obtained in U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of theU.S.
The Company is a limited liability, joint-stock corporation incorporated under the laws of Japan. Most of theCompany’s directors and executive officers reside in Japan. Many of the Company’s assets and the assets ofthese persons are located in Japan and elsewhere outside the U.S. It may not be possible, therefore, for U.S.
investors to effect service of process within the U.S. upon the Company or these persons or to enforce against theCompany or these persons judgments obtained in U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the16federal securities laws of the U.S. The Company believes that there is doubt as to the enforceability in Japan, in
original actions or in actions for enforcement of U.S. court judgments, of liabilities predicated solely upon thefederal securities laws of the U.S.
Special Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements
This annual report contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations,assumptions, estimates and projections about our business, our industry and capital markets around the world.
These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Generally, these forward-looking
statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may”, “will”, “expect”,“anticipate”, “estimate”, “plan” or similar words. These statements discuss future expectations, identify
strategies, contain projections of our results of operations or financial condition, or state other forward-looking
information.
Known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause our actual results, performance,
achievements or financial position to differ materially from any future results, performance, achievements orfinancial position expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement contained in this annual report. Suchrisks, uncertainties and other factors are set forth in this Item 3.D and elsewhere in this annual report.
Item 4. Information on the Company
A. History and Development of the Company.
The Company (previously known as The Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.) was incorporated in Japan on
December 25, 1925 under the Commercial Code of Japan when the securities division of The Osaka Nomura
Bank, Ltd. became a separate entity specializing in the trading and distribution of debt securities in Japan. The
Company was the first Japanese securities company to develop its business internationally with the opening in
1927 of a representative office in New York. In Japan, we broadened the scope of our business when we began
trading in equity securities in 1938 and when we organized the first investment trust in Japan in 1941.
Since the end of World War II, we have played a leading role in most major developments in the Japanese
securities market. These developments include the resumption of the investment trust business in the 1950s, theintroduction of public stock offerings by Japanese companies in the 1960s, the development of the over-thecounter bond market in the 1970s, the introduction of new types of investment trusts such as the medium-term
Japanese government bond investment trust in the 1980s, and the growth of the corporate bond and initial public
offering markets in the 1990s.
Our expansion overseas accelerated in 1967, when the Company acquired a controlling interest in Nomura
International (Hong Kong) Limited for the purpose of conducting broker-dealer activities in the Hong Kong
capital markets. Subsequently, we established a number of other overseas subsidiaries, including Nomura
Securities International, Inc. in the U.S. in 1969 as a broker dealer and Nomura International Limited, now
Nomura International plc, in the U.K. in 1981, which acts as an underwriter and a broker, as well as otheroverseas affiliates, branches and representative offices.
On October 1, 2001, we adopted a holding company structure. In connection with this reorganization, theCompany changed its name from “The Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.” to “Nomura Holdings, Inc.” The Company
continues to be listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange and other stock exchanges on which it was previously listed.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company assumed the Company’s securities businesses and was named“Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.”In December 2001, we listed our shares (in the form of American Depositary Shares evidenced by American
Depositary Receipts) on the New York Stock Exchange.
We have also enhanced our asset management business through the acquisition of a majority interest in
Nomura Asset Management Co., Ltd. (“NAM”) in March 2000. NAM became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Nomura in December 2001.
17

In June 2003, we adopted a committee-based corporate governance system under which we established theNomination Committee, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. See Item 6.C of this annual
report.
In February 2007, we acquired Instinet Incorporated, a global agency broker and major provider ofelectronic trading services for institutional investors, to develop an electronic platform in global equities.
In a series of steps beginning in September 2008, we acquired certain operations, including personnel, of
former Lehman Brothers in Asia, Europe and the Middle East.
The address of the Company’s registered office is 9-1, Nihonbashi 1-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8645,
Japan, telephone number: +81-3-5255-1000.
B. Business Overview.
Overview
We are one of the leading financial services groups in Japan and have worldwide operations. As of
March 31, 2013, we operated offices in over 30 countries and regions including Japan, the U.S., the U.K.,
Singapore and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“Hong Kong”) through our subsidiaries.
Our clients include individuals, corporations, financial institutions, governments and governmental
agencies.
Our business consists of the following three divisions, each followed by its principal business:•

Retail—investment consultation services•

Asset Management—development and management of investment trusts, and investment advisory
services•

Wholesale—serving corporations and institutional investors with a broad range of products and services

Nomura discloses segmental information elsewhere in this annual report and in our consolidated financial
statements based on these Divisions.
Corporate Goals and Principles
Nomura Group’s management vision is to enhance its corporate value by deepening society’s trust in thefirm and increasing satisfaction of stakeholders, including that of shareholders and clients.
As “Asia’s global investment bank”, Nomura will provide high value-added solutions to clients globally,
and recognizing its wider social responsibility, Nomura will continue to contribute to the economic growth anddevelopment of society.
To enhance its corporate value, Nomura places significance on earnings per share (“EPS”) and will seek tomaintain sustained improvement of the management target.
Our Business Divisions
RetailIn Retail, we conduct business activities by delivering a wide range of financial products and high quality
investment services mainly for individuals and corporations in Japan primarily through a network of nationwide
branches of Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. (“NSC”). The total number of its head office and local branches was18177 as of the end of March 2013. We offer investment consultation services to meet the medium- to long-term
needs of our clients. The aggregate market value of our retail client assets increased ¥11.8 trillion to ¥83.8 trillion
as of the end of March 2013 from ¥72.0 trillion a year ago. We discuss retail client assets in “Retail Client
Assets” under Item 5.A of this annual report.
In order to execute our business strategy, we employ various methods to deliver our services to clients.
These include face-to-face meetings with our Financial Advisors, either in our branch offices or through client
visits, communications through internet-based trading services, or through our call centers.
Asset Management
We conduct our asset management business, which consists of the development and management ofinvestment trusts and investment advisory services, primarily through NAM. NAM is the largest asset
management company in Japan in terms of assets under management in investment trusts as of March 31, 2013.
In Japan, our challenge is to shift individual financial assets from saving products into investment products tocreate business opportunities. In order to make these opportunities available, NAM manages various investment
trusts, ranging from low risk/low return products to high risk/high return products, and develops new products to
respond to various investor needs. Investment trusts are distributed to investors through NSC as well as throughfinancial institutions such as securities companies (including those outside our group), banks and Japan Post
Bank Co., Ltd. Investment trusts are also offered in defined contribution pension plans. We also provide
investment advisory services to public pensions, private pensions, governments and their agencies, central banks
and institutional investors.
Wholesale
As of March 2013, our Wholesale Division consisted of Global Markets, Investment Banking and certain
other non-Retail operations. We formed this division in April 2010 to promote seamless coordination between
these underlying businesses and to provide our corporate and institutional clients with timely, high value-added
services tailored to their needs.
Global Markets
We formed Global Markets in December 2012, integrating Fixed Income and Equities with the aim ofenhancing cooperation between these two businesses, so that the new organization would have the flexibility torespond to recent changes in market environments and facilitate our offering of services and products rooted inclient needs.
Fixed Income conducts sales, trading and market-making of fixed income-related products on a global basis.
Our fixed income offerings include, among other products, government securities, interest-rate derivatives,
investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds, credit derivatives, G-10 and emerging markets foreignexchange, asset-backed securities and mortgage-related products, in over-the-counter (“OTC”) and listed
markets. We also undertake primary dealership business in the Japanese government securities market as well as
in the Asian, European and U.S. markets. These product offerings are underpinned by our global structuringfunction which tailors ideas and trading strategies for our institutional and corporate client base.
Equities conducts sales, trading and market-making of equity-related products globally, including common
stock, convertible securities, futures, options and OTC equity-linked derivatives. In addition, we offer execution
services based on cutting-edge technologies such as electronic trading. Nomura is also a member of various
exchanges around the world, with leading positions on the London and Tokyo stock exchanges.
Investment Banking
We offer a broad range of investment banking services to a diverse range of corporations, financial
institutions, sovereigns, investment funds and others. We aim to develop and fortify solid relationships with theseclients on a long-term basis by providing them with our extensive resources for each bespoke solution.
19

Underwriting. We underwrite offerings of a wide range of securities and other financial instruments, which
include various types of stocks, convertible and exchangeable securities, investment grade debt, sovereign andemerging market debt, high yield debt, structured securities and other securities in Asia, Europe, U.S. and othermajor financial markets. We also arrange private placements and engage in other capital raising activities. We are
one of the leading equity and fixed income securities underwriters in Japan.
Financial Advisory & Solutions Services. We provide financial advisory services on business transactions
including mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs, capital structuring, corporate defense activities,
leveraged buyouts and risk solutions. Our involvement in initial public offerings (“IPOs”), reorganizations andother corporate restructurings related to industry consolidation enhances our opportunities to offer clients otheradvisory and investment banking services. We are one of the leading financial advisors in Asia and EMEA.
Private Equity. We engage in the private equity business, mainly in Japan and Europe. For a further
description of our private equity business, see Item 5.A “Private Equity Business” of this annual report.
We capitalize on the linkages between the Retail, the Asset Management and the Wholesale Divisions tooffer various financial instruments such as stocks, debt securities, investment trusts and variable annuity
insurance products, for the short, medium, and long-term, with different risk levels. We seek to provide
proprietary Nomura expertise to clients through various media such as our investment reports and internet-based
trading services.
Our Research Activities
We have an extensive network of intellectual capital with key research offices in Tokyo, Hong Kong andother major markets in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as, London and New York. Nomura is recognized as aleading content provider with an integrated global approach to providing capital markets research. Our
researchers collaborate closely across regions and disciplines to track changes and spot future trends in politics,
economics, foreign exchange, interest rates, equities, credit and quantitative analysis. Our Japan Equity Researchteam continued to top the Institutional Investor and Nikkei Veritas research polls in 2012. Our Fixed Income
Research teams topped the Nikkei Veritas rankings for the third straight year.
Our Information Technology
We believe that information technology is one of the key success factors for our overall business and intend
to develop and maintain a solid technology platform to ensure that the firm is able to fulfill the various needs ofour clients. Accordingly, we will continue to build a technology platform suitable for each business segment.
For example, for our retail clients, we provide internet-based trading services and current status reports on
asset portfolios, investments and transactions and investment information, including our research reports throughthe internet or mobile phones. In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, we have implemented a new platform
aiming to improve cost efficiency and increase system stability.
On the wholesale side, we have enhanced our technology platforms to provide better risk management andalso to increase trading capabilities through platforms allowing Direct Market Access and Algorithmic trading.
We also plan to further leverage our service entities in India to support our wholesale operations.
Competition
The financial services industry is intensely competitive and we expect it to continue remain so. We compete
globally with other brokers and dealers, investment banking firms, commercial banks, investment advisors andother financial services firms. We also face competition on regional, product and niche bases from local andspecialist firms. A number of factors determine our competitive position against other firms, including:•the quality, range and prices of our products and services,•

our ability to originate and develop innovative client solutions,20•

our ability to maintain and develop client relationships,•

our ability to access and commit capital resources,•

our ability to retain and attract qualified employees, and•our general reputation.

Our competitive position is also affected by the overall condition of the global financial markets, which are
influenced by factors such as:•

the monetary and fiscal policies of national governments and international economic organizations, and•economic developments both within and between Japan, the U.S., Europe and other major industrialized
and developing countries and regions.

In Japan, we compete with other Japanese and non-Japanese securities companies and other financial
institutions. Competition has become more intense due to deregulation in the Japanese financial industry since
the late 1990s and the increased presence of global securities companies and other financial institutions. In
particular, major global firms have increased their presence in securities underwriting, corporate advisory
services (particularly, mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) advisory) and secondary securities sales and trading.
There has also been substantial consolidation and convergence among financial institutions, both within
Japan and globally and this trend accelerated further in recent years as the credit crisis caused mergers andacquisitions and asset acquisitions in the industry. The growing presence and scale of financial groups which
encompass commercial banking, securities brokerage, investment banking and other financial services has led toincreased competition. Through their broadened offerings, these firms are able to create good client relationships
and leverage their existing client base in the brokerage and investment banking business as well.
In addition to the breadth of their products and services, these firms have the ability to pursue greater market
share in investment banking and securities products by reducing margins and relying on their commercial
banking, asset management, insurance and other financial services activities. This has resulted in pricing pressurein our investment banking and trading businesses and could result in pricing pressure in other areas of ourbusinesses. We have also competed, and expect to compete, with other financial institutions which commit
capital to businesses or transactions for market share in investment banking activities. In particular, corporateclients may seek loans or commitments in connection with investment banking mandates and other assignments.
Moreover, the trend toward consolidation and convergence has significantly increased the capital base andgeographic reach of some of our competitors, hastening the globalization of the securities and financial services
markets. To accommodate this trend, we will have to compete successfully with financial institutions that arelarge and well-capitalized, and that may have a stronger local presence and longer operating history outside
Japan.
Regulation
Japan
Regulation of the Securities Industry and Securities Companies. Pursuant to the FIEA, the Prime Minister ofJapan has the authority to supervise and regulate the securities industry and securities companies, and delegates
its authority to the Commissioner of the FSA. The Company, as a holding company of a securities company, as
well as its subsidiaries including NSC are subject to such supervision and regulation by the FSA. The
Commissioner of the FSA delegates certain authority to the Director General of Local Finance Bureaus to inspect
local securities companies and branches. Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission, an
external agency of the FSA which is independent from the Agency’s other bureaus, is vested with authority to
conduct day-to-day monitoring of the securities markets and to investigate irregular activities that hinder the fair21

trading of securities, including inspection of securities companies. Securities companies are also subject to therules and regulations of the Japanese stock exchanges and the Japan Securities Dealers Association, a selfregulatory organization of the securities industry.
To enhance investor protection, each Japanese securities company is required to segregate client assets andto hold membership in an Investor Protection Fund approved by the government under the FIEA. The Investor
Protection Fund is funded through assessments on its securities company members. In the event of failure of asecurities company that is a member of the fund, the Investor Protection Fund provides protection of up to¥10 million per client. The Investor Protection Fund covers claims related to securities deposited by clients withthe failed securities company and certain other client claims.
Regulation of Other Financial Services. Securities companies are not permitted to conduct banking or otherfinancial services directly, except for those which are registered as money lenders and engaged in money lending
business under the Money Lending Business Act or which hold permission to act as bank agents and conduct
banking agency activities under the Banking Law. Among the subsidiaries of the Company in Japan, NSC is asecurities company that is also registered as a money lender and holds permission to act as a bank agent. Anothersubsidiary of the Company, The Nomura Trust & Banking holds a banking license and trust business license.
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. The FIEA widely regulates financial products and services inJapan under the defined terms “financial instruments” and “financial instruments trading business”. It regulates
most aspects of securities transactions and the securities industry, including public offerings, private placements
and secondary trading of securities, on-going disclosure by securities issuers, tender offers for securities,
organization and operation of securities exchanges and self-regulatory associations, and registration of securities
companies. In addition, to enhance fairness and transparency in the financial markets and to protect investors, the
FIEA provides for, among other things, penalties for misrepresentations in disclosure documents and unfair
trading, strict reporting obligations for large shareholders and corporate information disclosure systems,
including annual and quarterly report systems, submission of confirmation certificates concerning thedescriptions in securities reports, and internal controls over financial reporting.
The FIEA also provides for corporate group regulations on securities companies the size of which exceeds
specified parameters (tokubetsu kinyu shouhin torihiki gyosha, “Special Financial Instruments Firm”) and on
certain parent companies designated by the Prime Minister (shitei oyagaisha, “Designated Parent Companies”)
and their subsidiaries (together the “Designated Parent Company Group”). The FIEA aims to regulate andstrengthen business management system, compliance system and risk management system to ensure theprotection of investors. The FIEA and its related guideline also provide reporting requirement to the FSA on the
Designated Parent Company Group’s business and capital adequacy ratio, enhanced public disclosures as well as
restrictions on the compensation system, which are designed to reduce excessive risk taking by their executives
and employees within the Designated Parent Company Group. We have been designated as the final parent
company of Designated Parent Companies within a corporate group (saishu shitei oyagaisha, “a Final DesignatedParent Company”) in April 2011 and are subject to these requirements. A violation of the FIEA may result invarious administrative sanctions, including the revocation of registration or license, the suspension of business or
an order to discharge any director or executive officer who has failed to comply with the FIEA.
Regulatory Changes. A bill to amend the FIEA was submitted to the Diet of Japan on March 9, 2012 andwas passed on September 6, 2012. A part of the amendment, based on the declaration reached at the G-20
Pittsburg Summit in September 2009 to enhance transparency of the settlement of over-the-counter (“OTC”)
derivative transactions, requires Financial Instruments Business Operators to trade certain OTC derivative
contracts through an electronic trading platform and to report such OTC derivative contracts to repositories. The
amendment is scheduled to become effective within three years from its promulgation.
On April 16, 2013, another bill to amend the FIEA was submitted to the Diet of Japan and was passed onJune 12, 2013. A part of the amendment includes establishing “Orderly Resolution Regime for Financial
Institutions” to prevent financial crisis that may spread across financial markets and may seriously impact the22real economy. Under the Orderly Resolution Regime, the Financial Crisis Response Council, chaired by thePrime Minister, will take measures such as providing liquidity etc. to ensure the performance of obligations forcritical market transactions where it is considered necessary to prevent severe market disruption. Such measures
will be funded by the financial industry, except in special cases where the government will provide financial
support.
Overseas
Our overseas offices and subsidiaries are also subject to various laws, rules and regulations applicable in the
countries where they conduct their operations, including, but not limited to, those promulgated and enforced by
the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the New York Stock
Exchange and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (a private organization with quasi-governmental
authority and a regulator for all securities companies doing business in the U.S.) in the U.S. and by the Prudential
Regulation Authority, the Financial Conduct Authority and the London Stock Exchange plc in the U.K. We arealso subject to international money laundering and related regulations in various countries. For example, theUSA Patriot Act of 2001 contains measures to prevent, detect and prosecute terrorism and international money
laundering by imposing significant compliance and due diligence obligations on, creating crimes and penalties.
Failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations could result in fines, suspension or expulsion, which could
materially and adversely affect us.
Regulatory Changes. In response to the financial markets crisis, governments and regulatory authorities invarious jurisdictions have made and continue to make numerous proposals to reform the regulatory framework
for, or impose a tax or levy upon, the financial services industry to enhance its resilience against future crises,
contribute to the relevant economy generally or for other purposes. In July 2010, the U.S. enacted the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) which is now the subject of amulti-agency rulemaking process. The rulemakings include, (i) create a tighter regulatory framework for OTC
derivatives to promote transparency and impose conduct rules in that marketplace; (ii) establish a process fordesignating nonbank financial firms as “systemic”, subject to increased (and sometimes new) prudential
oversight including early remediation, capital standards and new regulatory fees (“U.S. SIFIs”); (iii) prohibit
material conflicts of interest between firms that package and sell asset-backed securities (“ABS”) and firms thatinvest in ABS; (iv) establish risk retention requirements for ABS; and (v) a number of executive compensation
mandates, including rules to curtail incentive compensation that promotes excessive risk taking. The new
regulatory framework for OTC derivatives will include mandates for clearing transactions with designatedclearing organizations, exchange trading, new capital requirements, bilateral and variation margin for noncleared derivatives, and internal and external business conduct rules. Some U.S. derivatives rules may be applied
extraterritorially and therefore impact some Nomura non-U.S. entities.
Other aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act and related rulemakings include provisions that (i) prohibit deposittaking banks and their affiliates from engaging in proprietary trading and limit their ability to make investments
in hedge funds and private equity funds (the so-called “Volcker Rule”); (ii) empower regulators to liquidate
failing nonbank financial companies that are systemically important; (iii) provide for new systemic risk oversightand increased capital requirements for both bank and non-bank U.S. SIFIs; (iv) provide for a broader regulatory
oversight of hedge funds; and (v) new regulations regarding the role of credit rating agencies, investment
advisors and others. The exact details of the Dodd Frank Act implementation and ultimate impact on Nomura’s
operations will depend on the form and substance of the final regulations adopted by various governmental
agencies and oversight boards.
On July 19, 2011, the Financial Stability Board published a consultative document to establish a global
framework to improve authorities’ capacity to resolve failing systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs)
without systemic disruption and exposing taxpayers to the risk of loss. The proposed measures require G-SIFIs to
prepare and maintain recovery and resolution plans (“RRPs”) by December 2012. In light of such a global
framework, the Financial Services Authority in the U.K. (“U.K. FSA”) published a consultation on August 9,
2011 containing its proposals for RRPs. The consultation covered the requirement for banks and large investment
23

firms in the U.K.—not limited to G-SIFIs—to prepare and maintain RRPs. In a separate discussion paper, the UK
FSA explores matters relevant to resolving financial services firms, including the resolution of trading books,
enhancing the resolution toolkit and bail-ins. In May 2012, the U.K. FSA published a feedback statement settingout its approach to ensure firms develop appropriate recovery plans and resolution packs. The feedback statement
provides firms with clarity regarding what they are expected to do while final rules are being adjusted to take into
account developments in the international area.
On October 20, 2011, the European Commission published draft legislation for the Directive on markets infinancial instruments repealing Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. The draft
legislation has been split into two parts: the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and the Markets in
Financial Instruments Regulation (“MiFIR”). The draft legislation seeks to introduce wide-reaching changes tomarkets, including the extension of market transparency rules into non-equities and potentially reducing the sizeof the OTC derivative market by pushing derivatives onto exchanges.
Additionally on October 20, 2011, the European Commission published draft legislation for the review ofthe Market Abuse Directive (“MAD II”). The dossier has been split into two parts: the Market Abuse Directive
and the Market Abuse Regulation. The draft legislation seeks to strengthen market abuse provisions andintroduce measures allowing for effective deterrent of market abuse behaviors.
On April 1, 2013, the Financial Services Act 2012 was formally enacted (after having received Royal
Assent on December 19, 2012). The implementation of the Financial Services Act 2012 has resulted in U.K.
financial services regulation being split into a “twin peaks” approach. The Prudential Regulation Authority(“PRA”) has been formed as a subsidiary of the Bank of England and will be responsible for the prudential
supervision of a number of banks and deposit takers, plus certain large investment firms and insurers. It has asingle objective to “promote the safety and soundness of regulated firms.” The Financial Conduct Authority(“FCA”) has been established as a separate entity and will be responsible for the prudential supervision of firms
not supervised by the PRA and for market conduct matters for all authorized firms. The FCA will also have asingle strategic objective of “making markets work well.” Nomura’s main operating subsidiaries in the UK(Nomura International plc and Nomura Bank International plc) are regulated by both the PRA and FCA.
Regulatory Capital Rules
Japan
The FIEA requires that all Financial Instruments Firms (Category I) (“Financial Instruments Firms I”),
a category that includes NSC and Nomura Financial Products & Services, Inc. (“NFPS”), ensure that their capital
adequacy ratios do not fall below 120% on a non-consolidated basis. The FIEA also requires Financial
Instruments Firms I to file month-end reports regarding their capital adequacy ratios with the Commissioner of
the FSA or the Director-General of the appropriate Local Finance Bureau, and also to disclose their capital
adequacy ratios to the public on a quarterly basis. In addition, if the capital adequacy ratio of a Financial
Instruments Firm I falls below 140%, it must file a daily report with the authorities. The FIEA provides foractions which the Prime Minister, through the Commissioner of the FSA or the Director-General of theappropriate Local Finance Bureau, may take if any Financial Instruments Firm I fails to meet the capital
adequacy requirement. More specifically, if the capital adequacy ratio of any Financial Instruments Firms I falls
below 120%, the Commissioner of the FSA or the Director-General of the appropriate Local Finance Bureau mayorder the Financial Instruments Firm I to change its business conduct, to deposit its property in trust, or may
issue any other supervisory order that such authorities deem necessary and appropriate to protect the interests ofthe general public or investors. If the capital adequacy ratio of a Financial Instruments Firm I falls below 100%,
the authorities may take further action, including the issuance of orders to temporarily suspend its business andthe revocation of its registration as a Financial Instruments Firm I under the FIEA.
Under the FIEA and regulations thereunder, the “capital adequacy ratio” means the ratio of adjusted capital
to a quantified total of business risks. Adjusted capital is defined as net worth less illiquid assets. Net worth
24mainly consists of stated capital, additional paid-in capital, retained earnings, reserves for securities transactions,certain allowances for doubtful current accounts, net unrealized gains/losses in the market value of investment
securities, and subordinated debt. Illiquid assets generally include non-current assets, certain deposits andadvances and prepaid expenses. The business risks are divided into three categories: (i) market risks (i.e., risks ofasset value changes due to decline in market values and other reasons), (ii) counterparty risks (i.e., risks ofdelinquency of counterparties and other reasons) and (iii) basic risks (i.e., risks in carrying out daily businessactivities, such as administrative problems with securities transactions and clerical mistakes), each quantified in
the manner specified in a rule promulgated under the FIEA.
The FSA reviewed the FIEA and regulations thereunder in line with Basel 2.5 framework and the revised
regulations for Basel 2.5 were implemented at the end of December 2011. We are required to calculate themarket risks increased significantly are required to be calculated requirement as a result of under the Basel 2.5
rule implementation, which is significantly larger than before.
We closely monitor the capital adequacy ratio of NSC and NFPS on a continuous basis. Since theintroduction of the capital adequacy requirement in Japan in 1989, we have at all times been in compliance withthese requirements. We believe that we will continue to be in compliance with all applicable capital adequacy
requirements in the foreseeable future.
Under the “Guideline for Financial Conglomerates Supervision”, established by the FSA in June 2005, a“financial conglomerate” is defined as a corporate group, including two or more different types of financial
institutions, such as a securities company and a bank. Nomura is classified as a financial conglomerate. Similar to
Financial Instruments Firms I, financial conglomerates are required to maintain 100% capital adequacy ratio on aconsolidated basis, unless otherwise specified by other law or notice. The Financial Instruments Business
Operators Guidelines, when established by the FSA in July 2007, required corporate groups of financial
instruments firms engaging in international operations to report their consolidated capital adequacy ratios to theCommissioner of the FSA semi-annually and additionally if the ratio falls below 120%.
Until the end of March 2011, the Company calculated its consolidated capital adequacy ratio according to
the “Criteria for bank holding companies to judge whether their capital adequacy status is appropriate in light of
their own and their subsidiaries’ asset holdings, etc. under Article 52-25 of the Banking Act” (the “Bank Holding
Companies Notice”), as permitted under the provision in the “Comprehensive Guidelines for Supervision of
Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc.”. The capital adequacy ratio (the ratio of adjusted capital toquantified total risk-weighted assets) required to be maintained by bank holding companies with international
operations under the Bank Holding Companies Notice is 8.0% on a consolidated basis. We elected to calculate
our capital adequacy ratio in accordance with the Bank Holding Companies Notice beginning on March 31,
2009.
As discussed above, the FSA amended the FIEA and introduced new rules on consolidated regulation andsupervision of securities companies on consolidated basis on April 1, 2011 to improve the stability andtransparency of Japan’s financial system and ensure the protection of investors. The FSA also amended the FIEA
to include reporting on consolidated regulatory capital for the Final Designated Parent Companies. On the
introduction of these rules, NSC was designated as a Special Financial Instruments Firm, following which wehave been designated as a Final Designated Parent Company. As such, we are required to calculate consolidated
regulatory capital adequacy ratio according to the FSA’s “Establishment of standards on sufficiency of capitalstock of a final designated parent company and its subsidiary entities, etc. compared to the assets held thereby”(2010 FSA Regulatory Notice No. 130; “Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company”).
Accordingly, since our designation as a Final Designated Parent Company in April 2011, we now calculate ourBasel rule-based consolidated regulatory capital adequacy ratio according to the Capital Adequacy Notice on
Final Designated Parent Company.
The FSA also amended the FIEA to include reporting on consolidated regulatory capital for the Final
Designated Parent Companies, effective April 1, 2011. We are subject to this reporting requirements as well as
the capital adequacy requirements described above.
25

The Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company has been revised to be in line with Basel
2.5 and Basel III, and we have calculated a Basel III-based consolidated capital adequacy ratio from the end of
March 2013. Basel 2.5 includes significant change in calculation method of market risk and Basel III includes
redefinition of capital items for the purpose of requiring higher levels of capital and expansion of the scope ofcredit risk-weighted assets calculation.
If our capital ratios fall to the minimum level required by the FSA, our business activities may be impacted.
However, these ratios are currently at well capitalized levels. We have met all capital adequacy requirements towhich we are subject and have consistently operated in excess of the FSA’s capital adequacy requirements.
Subject to future developments in regulatory capital regulations and standards, there has been no significant
change in our capital ratios which the management believes would have material impact on our operations.
The Basel Committee has issued a series of announcements regarding a broader program to strengthen theregulatory capital framework in light of weaknesses revealed by the financial crises, as described in“Consolidated Regulatory Requirements” under Item 5.B of this annual report. The Capital Adequacy Notice on
Final Designated Parent Company is expected to incorporate the series of rules and standards in line with theschedule proposed by the Basel Committee.
At the G-20 summit in November 2011, the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) and the Basel Committeeannounced the list of global systemically important banks (“G-SIBs”) and the additional requirements to the
G-SIBs including the recovery and resolution plan. The FSB also announced the group of G-SIBs will be updated
annually and published by the FSB each November. We were not designated as a G-SIB in November 2011 andNovember 2012. On the other hand, the FSB and the Basel Committee were asked to work on extending theframework for G-SIBs to domestic systemically important banks (“D-SIBs”) and the Basel Committee developed
and published a set of principles on the assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement for
D-SIBs, as described in “Consolidated Regulatory Requirements” under Item 5.B of this annual report.
Overseas
In the U.S., Nomura Securities International, Inc. (“NSI”) is a registered broker-dealer and registered futurescommission merchant. As such, NSI is subject to the minimum net capital requirements of the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. NSI is regulated by self-regulatoryorganizations, such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Groupexchanges. These requirements specify minimum levels of capital that U.S. broker-dealers are required tomaintain and limit the amount of leverage that such broker-dealers may use in their businesses. As a primary
dealer of U.S. government securities, NSI is also subject to the capital adequacy requirements under theGovernment Securities Act of 1986.
In Europe, the Nomura Europe Holdings plc group is regulated under consolidated supervision by the
Prudential Regulatory Authority in the U.K. Various banking and broker/dealer subsidiaries of the group are
regulated on a stand alone basis by their appropriate local regulators.
In addition, certain of our other subsidiaries are subject to various securities and banking regulations, andthe capital adequacy requirements established by the regulatory and exchange authorities of the countries inwhich those subsidiaries operate. We believe that each such subsidiary is, and will in the foreseeable future be, incompliance with these requirements in all material respects.

26

Management Challenges and Strategies
The management objective of the Nomura Group is to increase its corporate value through trust gained fromsociety and by increasing satisfaction among shareholders, clients and other stakeholders. In order to respondflexibly to various changes in the environment and achieve stable profit growth to increase corporate value, we
also emphasize earnings per share (EPS) as a management target and strive to continuously improve the same.
In order to achieve our management objective, we are placing top priority on ensuring that profits arerecorded by all business segments in all regions.
Specifically, as part of these efforts, we have steadily implemented measures to reduce costs by a total of
1 billion dollars through “narrowing and deepening” our businesses especially in various overseas locations. In
addition, we have also striven to exert the comprehensive strength of our Group and enhance cross-regional andcross-business cooperation by accurately meeting client needs.
Basel III (new capital requirement regulations for financial institutions) has been applied in Japan startingfrom the end of March of this year, ahead of the U.S. and Europe, and the Company is now subject to theseregulations. Regulations for financial institutions are starting to be implemented globally, as evidenced by newrules for derivatives and other financial transactions put in place in various countries.
Furthermore, fundamental institutional revisions known as bank reform are scheduled in the West, andfinancial transactions tax has been introduced in part of European countries and debates are ongoing about
integrating the bank supervision system. These regulatory tightening actions affect the trading markets ofequities, bonds and derivative products as well as the conditions of competition among financial institutions.
Therefore, the Company will take the necessary measures in carefully responding to these changes.
Challenges and strategies in each division are as follows:•

Retail Division
The business policy in the Retail Division is focused on client consultation services and investment
proposals that are aligned with the life stage of clients to meet the individual needs of each client. We
also offer various services at our business offices as well as through Nomura Net & Call, our integrated
service via the internet and call centers to accommodate diverse lifestyles of clients.
In order to accurately meet client investment needs, we will provide quality products and services
including those based on tax exemption for small investments in listed shares and investment trusts (socalled “Japanese ISA” or “NISA” as its nickname) scheduled to start in 2014.

•

Asset Management Division
In our investment trust business, we will provide individual clients with a diverse range of investment
opportunities to meet investors’ various demands. In our investment advisory business, we will provide
value-added investment services to our institutional clients on a global basis. We intend to increase
assets under management and expand our client base for these two core businesses. As a distinctive
investment manager based in Asia with the ability to provide a broad range of products and services,
we aim to gain the trust of investors worldwide by making continuous efforts to improve investment
performance.

•

Wholesale Division
For the Wholesale Division, cross-business and cross-regional cooperation are increasingly important
while at the same time strengthening our expertise in each business area is also required in order toaccommodate client needs.
27

As part of the initiatives taken for each business areas, Global Markets has focused on delivering highvalue-added products and solutions to our clients by leveraging our sophisticated trading expertise,
intellectual capital in research and our global distribution capabilities. In Investment Banking, we willcontinue our efforts in building a global structure not only to implement cross-border M&A andfinancing both in domestic and overseas markets but also to provide solution business services
associated with the said M&A and financing, while the globalization of the business activities of ourclients develops.
In addition, as part of the initiatives aimed at cross-business and cross-regional cooperation, we haveidentified Asia as a strategic region based on expectations of its medium- to long-term economic
growth, and we will further enhance our efforts in that region there. We aim to enhance our presence asa global financial services group by enhancing regional integration between Japan and the rest of Asiaand enhancing the coordination of business between Asia and Europe, the Americas and the rest of theworld. In implementing the initiatives outlined above, while also helping to strengthen the global
financial and capital markets, we aim to bring together the collective strengths of our domestic andinternational operations to realize our management objectives and to maximize corporate value byenhancing profitability across our businesses in group.
Risk Management, Compliance and Other Matters
Amid the expansion of global business, we must continue to enhance our risk management system andincrease its efficiency in order to ensure financial soundness and enhanced corporate value. We will continue todevelop a system where senior management directly engage in a proactive risk management approach for precise
decision making.
As our business becomes increasingly international and diverse, we recognize the growing importance ofcompliance. We will continue to focus on improving the management structure to comply with local laws andregulations in the countries that we operate.
In addition, we will continuously review and improve our existing overall compliance system and rules withinitiatives towards promoting an environment of high ethical standards among all of our executive management
and employees. In this way, we will meet the expectations of society and clients toward the Nomura Group andcontribute to the further development of the financial and capital markets.
In August 2012, Japan’s Financial Services Agency issued a business improvement order to our subsidiary,
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd., regarding the management of corporate-related information for public stock
offerings.
With regard to this matter, Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. submitted a business improvement report to Japan’s
Financial Services Agency on August 8, 2012 and the report was accepted. On June 29, 2012, prior to theissuance of the above mentioned business improvement order, Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. announced
improvement measures regarding the method of communication for corporate-related information and systems of
information control system. All measures were implemented by the end of December 2012. We will continue to
conduct voluntary inspections and investigations and will further reinforce and enhance our internal controls
structure to prevent recurrence and to regain the trust.
We will continue to strengthen our internal governance system. Since April 2013 of this year, we have
implemented reinforcement measures to ensure the independence of our Internal Audit from execution side, sothat the effectiveness of the Internal Audit will be strengthened under the business environment which is rapidlychanging and highly developed risk management situations. We will further enhance and reinforce our internal
control system to maintain the trust of clients, shareholders and investors.

28

C. Organizational Structure.
The following table lists the Company and its significant subsidiaries and their respective countries ofincorporation. Indentation indicates the principal parent of each subsidiary. Proportions of ownership interest
include indirect ownership.

Name

Country

Ownership
Interest

Nomura Holdings, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Asset Management Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Nomura Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Babcock & Brown Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Capital Investment Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Investor Relations Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Financial Partners Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Funds Research and Technologies Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Research & Advisory Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Business Services Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Facilities, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Institute of Capital Markets Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Healthcare Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Private Equity Capital Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Agri Planning & Advisory Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Land and Building Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Asahi Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Financial Products & Services, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Holding America Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Securities International, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Corporate Research and Asset Management Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Derivative Products Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura America Mortgage Finance, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Financial Holding America, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Global Financial Products, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NHI Acquisition Holding, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Instinet Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Europe Holdings plc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura International plc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Bank International plc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Banque Nomura France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Bank (Luxembourg) S.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Bank (Deutschland) GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Investment Banking (Middle East) B.S.C. (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Europe Finance N.V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Principal Investment plc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Capital Markets plc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura European Investment Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Asia Holding N.V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Singapore Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Australia Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P.T. Nomura Indonesia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Asia Investment (India Powai) Pte. Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Services India Private Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Financial Advisory and Securities (India) Private Limited . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Asia Investment (Fixed Income) Pte. Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.K.
U.K.
U.K.
FranceLuxemburg
Germany
Switzerland
Bahrain
The Netherlands
U.K.
U.K.
U.K.
The Netherlands
Hong Kong
Singapore
Australia
Indonesia
Singapore
India
India
Singapore

—
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
51
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
96
100
100
100
100

(%)

29

D. Property, Plants and Equipment.
Our Properties
As of March 31, 2013, our principal head office is located in Tokyo, Japan and occupies 1,025,685 square
feet of office space. Our other major offices in Japan are our Osaka branch office, which occupies 125,299 square
feet, our Nagoya branch office, which occupies 82,918 square feet, and the head office of NAM in Tokyo, which
occupies 157,228 square feet. Nomura sold part of its investments in Nomura Real Estate Holdings Inc.
(“NREH”) in March 2013 which is now accounted for by the equity method as of March 31, 2013. As a result,the properties NREH possesses were unconsolidated. See Note 11 Business combinations in our consolidated
financial statements included in this annual report.
As of March 31, 2013, our major offices outside Japan are the head offices of Nomura International plc(“NIP”) located in London, which occupies 479,761 square feet, the New York head office of Nomura Securities
International, Inc., which occupies 159,835 square feet, and the offices of Nomura International (Hong Kong)
Limited located in Hong Kong which occupies 156,841 square feet. We own the buildings and we either own orlease the land for the offices in London. We lease most of our other overseas office space.
As of March 31, 2013, the major office of Nomura Services India Private Limited, our specialized service
company in India, occupies 476,271 square feet.
As of March 31, 2013, the aggregate book value of the land and buildings we owned, including capitalleases was ¥198 billion, and the aggregate book value of equipment we owned, including communications anddata processing facilities, was ¥53 billion.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
We are a large accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There are
no written comments which have been provided by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding
our periodic reports under that Act not less than 180 days before the end of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013
and which remain unresolved as of the date of the filing of this annual report with the Commission.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
A. Operating Results.
You should read the following discussion of our operating and financial review and prospects together with
Item 3.A “Selected Financial Data” of this annual report and our consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this annual report.
This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties andassumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements
as a result of factors, including, but not limited to, those under Item 3.D “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in thisannual report.
Business EnvironmentJapan
The Japanese economy recorded two quarters of contraction in the first half of the year ended March 31,
2013. Although public investment, mainly in the form of post-quake reconstruction spending, expanded in Japan,
exports weakened amid a depressed global economy triggered by the European debt crisis, and capital investment
30

consequently stagnated. In the second half of the fiscal year, external demand showed signs of picking up amid
progress with inventory adjustments in Asia, and with consumer spending also trending firmly, the Japanese
economy headed toward recovery. In particular, the inauguration of new Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s
administration in December 2012 fueled expectations for monetary easing action by the Bank of Japan (“BOJ”)
that prompted yen depreciation and a rally on equity markets. Economic growth then accelerated in the fourth
quarter of the fiscal year, supported chiefly by consumer spending. As a result, Japan’s real gross domestic
product (“GDP”) in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, expanded for a third consecutive year, by 1.2% yearon-year, following 0.2% growth in the prior fiscal year.
Corporate earnings as a whole headed toward recovery in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. Althoughprofits decreased in materials sectors such as chemicals and steel/nonferrous metals owing to the overseas economic
downturn in the first half of the fiscal year, they rose markedly in the automotive sector as the impact of the Thai
floods disappeared and as subsidies for energy-efficient cars in Japan provided a boost. We estimate that recurring
profits at major companies (those in the Russell/Nomura Large Cap Index) increased by 13% year-on-year in thefiscal year ended March 31, 2013, marking a turnaround from the 12% decrease in the prior fiscal year. The
nonmanufacturing industry performed solidly on the whole, with the exception of the utilities sector, where losses
widened.
The stock market performed sluggishly in the first half of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, amid
European debt concerns, the depressed global economy, and appreciation of the yen. In the second half, the yen
weakened and the stock market advanced following the dissolution of the House of Representatives in November
2012, when Liberal Democratic Party President Shinzo Abe called on the BOJ to take monetary easing action.
After the Abe administration came into power in December 2012, expectations began to heighten toward“Abenomics” with its three policy arrows—bold monetary easing, flexible fiscal policy, and private sector-led
growth strategies—and these underpinned further stock market gains through the end of the fiscal year. The
Tokyo Stock Price Index (the “TOPIX”) advanced 21.1% over the course of the fiscal year, from 854.35 points at
the end of March 2012 to 1,034.71 points at the end of March 2013.
The Nikkei Stock Average rose 23.0% over the fiscal year as a whole, from 10,083.56 at the end of March2012 to 12,397.91 at the end of March 2013.
The yields on newly issued 10-year Japanese government bonds trended downward over the fiscal year as awhole, reflecting a deepening of the European debt crisis, the global economic slowdown, and monetary easing
moves accompanying these developments, as well as the bold monetary easing action taken in Japan with thelaunch of the Abe administration. The yields were a little under 1% as of the end of March 2012 and had fallen to
the lower 0.7% level by late July in reaction to the global trend toward monetary easing. Concerns about politicalturbulence in Europe and expectations for monetary easing under new BOJ leadership emerged from January
2013, and yields had subsequently declined to the mid-0.5% level by the end of March 2013.
On the foreign exchange markets, the U.S. economy had a major influence over the value of the yen against
the U.S. dollar in the first half of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. Against the euro, the value of the yen wasaffected by debt problems in Greece, Spain and other European economies. The change in government in Japanand the launch of a bold monetary easing program had a major impact on the yen from November 2012, and thecurrency weakened considerably against both the U.S. dollar and euro. At the end of March 2012, the yen wastrading at the ¥83 level against the U.S. dollar and the ¥110 level against the euro. Initially in the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2013, the yen appreciated at a moderate pace against the U.S. dollar, rising to the ¥77 level inJune amid concerns about recovery in the U.S. economy prompted by weak employment growth and other data.
The yen also strengthened to the ¥94 level against the euro in July as growing fiscal instability in Spain reignited
concerns about the European debt crisis. In September, the yen weakened to the ¥103 level against the euro after
the European Central Bank (“ECB”) announced the unlimited Outright Monetary Transactions (“OMT”)
program. Japan’s House of Representatives was then dissolved in November, paving the way for the new Abeled LDP administration in December, and with the new government calling on the BOJ to take monetary easing31

action, the yen depreciated against both the U.S. dollar and euro. As a result, the yen was trading at the ¥94 levelversus the U.S. dollar and the ¥120 level versus the euro at the end of March 2013.
Overseas
Among the economies of the leading industrialized nations, recovery in the U.S. was underpinned byquantitative easing policies, while the European economy contracted as a result of a credit crunch owing to theeffects of the sovereign debt crisis and the implementation of fiscal austerity measures to address debt problems.
The global economy performed weakly in the first half of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, as the recessionin Europe had repercussions for emerging economies, but in the second half of the fiscal year it rebounded as theleading industrialized nations took additional monetary easing action and made progress addressing the European
debt crisis. In international commodity markets, prices fell markedly for a time, including for crude oil, owing to
the effects of the European debt crisis, but later regained stability as global financial markets returned to normal.
U.S. real GDP improved slightly with 2.2% year-on-year growth in 2012, having expanded 1.8% in 2011.
This growth reflected solid housing investment and consumer spending as both home prices and share prices roseon the back of further monetary easing, including a third round of quantitative easing (“QE3”).
The Federal Reserve Board (the “FRB”) launched QE3 in September 2012 amid delayed improvement in
the jobs market and other developments. It further pursued monetary easing in December 2012 by announcing
the zero interest rate policy would be maintained until targets for unemployment and inflation were met, and by
unveiling a program of additional Treasury purchases. The U.S. stock market declined in the first half of the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, as the European sovereign debt crisis resurfaced, but rose in the second halfowing to a number of factors, including the unlimited OMT program introduced by the ECB, additional monetaryeasing action by the FRB, the avoidance of the fiscal cliff (that would have resulted in the discontinuation ofmajor tax breaks in the U.S. at the same time as large cuts in expenditure), and expectations for improvement inboth the U.S. economy and corporate earnings. The Dow Jones Industrial Average stood at 13,212.04 at the endof March 2012 then fell below 13,000 in May 2012 before rallying to 14,578.54 at the end of March 2013. The
yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries was around 2.2% at the end of March 2012 and fell to around 1.4% in July 2012amid stock market declines and expectations of ongoing FRB easing, but had climbed to around 1.9% by the endof March 2013.
In Europe, Eurozone real GDP shrank 0.6% year-on-year in 2012 after growth of 1.4% in 2011. The
economy entered a recession as a credit crunch took hold due to the effects of the sovereign debt crisis and as
governments adopted austerity measures to address their debt problems. Concerns over sovereign risk entered atemporary lull on the introduction of the ECB’s unlimited OMT program and bailout packages for Greece andSpain, but conditions remained severe in the real economy. European stock markets fell on growing market
concerns but subsequently rallied, with the result that the benchmark German stock index (“DAX”) advanced byabout 12% during the year ended March 31, 2013.
Economic growth slowed across Asia as a whole in 2012, but the picture was mixed, with China’s economic
growth decelerating while Southeast Asian economies such as Thailand and the Philippines expanded strongly.
Real GDP growth in China in 2012 was 7.8%, versus 9.3% in 2011. The economic slowdown was exacerbated in
the first half of 2012 by a decrease in exports to Europe and a slowing in real estate-related investment, but in thesecond half, the economy bottomed and began to recover with support from monetary easing, measures tostimulate consumption, and infrastructure-related investment. The key challenge for China amid an anticipatedtightening in labor supply-demand is whether it can make the transition from investment-led to consumption-led
economic growth while at the same time reining in inflation.
Executive Summary
Looking back at the global economy during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, there was economic
slowdown in emerging nations as well as in the leading industrialized nations through the middle of 2012 mainly
32due to uncertainty over the outcome of the European sovereign debt crisis. The global economy subsequently
showed trends of modest recovery over the end of 2012 due to factors such as monetary easing action by majorindustrialized countries and structural reform efforts by the ECB aimed at maintaining the value of the Euro.
Amid this situation, the trend of shifting of funds into risk assets such as stocks was accelerated on a global basis.
Meanwhile, economic activity in Japan was weak until the end of 2012 due to factors such as stagnation inexports, but the change in government was followed by correction of the high yen and a rise in stock prices due
to positive expectations regarding fiscal and monetary policy aimed at pulling out of deflation, and the businesssentiment improved.
The TOPIX began the fiscal year at 856.05 points. The index remained low during the first half of thecurrent fiscal year, including a fall to 695.51 points in June, a low not seen since December 1983. However, areversal occurred in November and the index recovered to 1,034.71 points at the end of March, 2013. The US
dollar-yen exchange rate saw substantial correction of the high yen, moving from the 77 yen range at the
beginning of the current fiscal year to 94 yen range by the end of the March, 2013. With respect to financial
regulations, Basel III (new capital requirement regulations for financial institutions) and other widespreadreforms aimed at supervision of financial institutions have been implemented in a phased manner in Japan andoverseas. We need to continue to follow these changes closely.
Amid this environment and under the basic philosophy of “placing our clients at heart of everything we do,”we strove to accommodate ever-changing needs, diversify our products and services and make proposals withhigher added value. The Retail Division promoted investment consultation, while the Asset Management
Division worked to increase assets under management on a global basis and enhance investment performance. In
the Wholesale Division, we implemented a “narrow and deep” strategy focused on business areas where we candeliver added value to our clients and enhanced cooperation among regions and business units, thereby we haveaccommodated to the diversified needs of our clients.
Furthermore, following the cost reduction efforts made during the previous fiscal year, we continued tosteadily take steps aimed for an additional cost reduction of $1.0 billion during the current fiscal year to ensurestable profits in a continuous manner regardless of fluctuation in the market environment. Also, with the aim of
the optimal allocation of management resources, shares of Nomura Real Estate Holdings, Inc. were sold in Marchof this year to convert it from a consolidated subsidiary of the Company to an affiliate accounted for by theequity method. Meanwhile, we have also made steady investments including those on systems for the purpose ofoperational streamlining, aiming at reorganizing business platforms. As a result, we earned ¥1,813.6 billion for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, a 18% increase from the previous fiscal year. Non-interest expenses
increased 9% versus the previous fiscal year to ¥1,575.9 billion, income before income taxes was ¥237.7 billion,
and net income attributable to the shareholders of NHI was ¥107.2 billion. Consequently, ROE for the full fiscal
year was 4.9%.
In Retail, net revenue for the year ended March 31, 2013 increased by 14% from the previous year to¥397.9 billion, due primarily to increasing commissions from the distribution of investment trusts and brokeragecommissions. Non-interest expenses increased by 4% to ¥297.3 billion. As a result, income before income taxes
increased by 59% to ¥100.6 billion. In order to accurately respond to the investment needs of each client, we
continue with sales activities focused on providing client consultation services and investment proposals basedon the same. As a result of such efforts, our monthly total sales reached a level exceeding ¥1.0 trillion.
Furthermore, total retail client assets increased to ¥83.8 trillion from ¥72.0 trillion at the end of the previous
fiscal year. The number of client accounts increased by 40,000 to end the fiscal year at 502.5 million accounts,
indicating steady growth in the business base.
In Asset Management, net revenue for the year ended March 31, 2013 increased by 5% from the previous
year to ¥68.9 billion, primarily due to an increase in assets under management. Non-interest expenses increased33

by 6% to ¥47.8 billion. As a result, income before income taxes increased by 3% to ¥21.2 billion. In theinvestment trust business, there was an inflow into funds representing a wide range of investment assets,
including Japanese equities and overseas bonds, through products that meet client needs, such as funds aimed atmaintaining low and medium risk levels and funds that match the investment environment. In the investment
advisory business, there was an increase in mandates from overseas clients, mainly financial institutions in
Europe and government agencies in Asia. As a result, assets under management as of March 31, 2013 increasedby ¥3.3 trillion to ¥27.9 trillion from the end of the previous fiscal year.
In Wholesale, net revenue for the year ended March 31, 2013 increased by 16% from the previous year to¥644.9 billion. The environment was continuously challenging in the first half of the fiscal year, characterized byresurgent concerns over economic and financial markets in Europe, and revenue remained low. In the second halfof the fiscal year, we posted gains from the sale of an investment to a private equity fund in the third quarter.
Also, Japanese market conditions took a favorable turn due to anticipation of economic recovery spurred by thechange in government and driven by revenue in Japan in the fourth quarter, net revenue for the fiscal year
increased from the previous year. The additional cost reduction of $1.0 billion announced in September 2012 isprogressing on schedule and non-interest expenses decreased by 3% to ¥573.2 billion. As a result, income before
income taxes totaled ¥71.7 billion.
Results of Operations
Overview
The following table provides selected consolidated statements of income information for the years indicated.
Millions of yen, except percentages
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Non-interest revenues:
Commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fees from investment banking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset management and portfolio service fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gain on trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain (loss) on investments in equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 405,463 ¥
107,005
143,939
336,503
19,292(16,677)
43,864

Total Non-interest revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

347,135
59,638144,251
272,557
25,098
4,005
563,186¥ 359,069
62,353141,029
367,979
8,053
38,686
708,767

1,039,389
91,3091,415,870
119,989

1,685,936
127,695

Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,130,698
1,037,443

1,535,859
1,450,902

1,813,631
1,575,901

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93,25561,33084,95758,903

237,730
132,039

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥31,925
3,264¥

26,054
14,471¥ 105,691(1,543)

Net income attributable to NHI shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥28,661¥

11,583¥ 107,234

Return on equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.4%

0.6%

4.9%

Net revenue increased by 18% from ¥1,535,859 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to¥1,813,631 million for the year ended March 31, 2013. Commissions increased by 3%, due primarily to anincrease in commissions from the distribution of investment trust certificates. Fees from investment banking
increased by 5%, due primarily to an increase in commissions received from equity and equity related products.
34

Asset management and portfolio service fees decreased by 2%. Net gain on trading increased by 35% to¥367,979 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily driven by the revenue from Fixed Income trading.
Net gain on trading also included total losses of ¥57.8 billion attributable to changes in Nomura’s own
creditworthiness with respect to derivative liabilities and financial liabilities for which the fair value option has
been elected. This net loss was due primarily to the tightening of Nomura’s credit spreads during the period. Gainon private equity investments decreased by 68% due primarily to the realized gains on equity securities of certain
investee companies for the year ended March 31, 2012. Other was ¥708,767 million for the year ended March 31,
2013, including ¥663,466 million of revenue from of Nomura Land and Building Co., Ltd (“NLB”) and its
related subsidiaries. This contained ¥336,858 million of revenues from real estate sales generated by Nomura
Real Estate Holdings Inc. (“NREH”) which was a subsidiary of NLB. The revenues were recognized when sales
have closed, the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay forthe real estate and Nomura doesn’t have a substantial continuing involvement in the real estate. Also, ¥50,139
million of revenues were from Nomura’s sale of a portion of its holding shares of NREH in March 2013. This
included ¥38,468 million of the unrealized gain from Nomura’s remaining shares. With this sale, Nomura nolonger maintains controlling financial interest and NREH has changed from a consolidated subsidiary to anaffiliate accounted for by the equity method.
Net revenue increased by 36% from ¥1,130,698 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to¥1,535,859 million for the year ended March 31, 2012. Commissions decreased by 14%, due primarily to a decreasein commissions from the distribution of investment trusts, reflecting the turmoil in the global financial markets
which was mainly caused by the European sovereign debt crisis. Fees from investment banking decreased by 44%,due primarily to a decrease in transaction volume in equity finance for Japanese companies. Net gain on trading was¥272,557 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, due primarily to downturn in financial markets mainly causedby the European sovereign debt crisis. Net gain on trading also included total gains of ¥28.8 billion attributable tochanges in Nomura’s own creditworthiness with respect to derivative liabilities and financial liabilities for which
the fair value option has been elected. This net gain was due primarily to the widening of Nomura’s credit spreads
during the period. Gain on private equity investments was ¥25,098 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 due
primarily to realized gains on equity securities of certain investee companies. Other was ¥563,186 million for theyear ended March 31, 2012, including ¥510,556 million relating to the conversion of NLB into a subsidiary of
Nomura Holdings, Inc. Of this amount, ¥24,299 million was recognized at the time of the acquisition and istherefore expected to be non-recurring in nature and the remaining ¥486,257 million relates to operating revenues of
NLB which were consolidated into Nomura’s group revenue from acquisition date. This included ¥251,377 millionof revenues from real estate sales generated by NREH.
Net interest revenue was ¥91,309 million for the year ended March 31, 2011, ¥119,989 million for the year
ended March 31, 2012 and ¥127,695 million for the year ended March 31, 2013. Net interest revenue is afunction of the level and mix of total assets and liabilities, which includes trading assets and financing andlending transactions, and the level, term structure and volatility of interest rates. Net interest revenue is an
integral component of trading activity. In assessing the profitability of our overall business and of our Global
Markets business in particular, we view net interest revenue and non-interest revenues in aggregate. For the year
ended March 31, 2013, interest revenue decreased by 10% due mainly to a decrease of dividends and interest
income on reverse repo transactions in our Europe region and interest expense decreased by 16% due primarily toa decrease in interest expense on repo transactions and loans. As a result, net interest revenue for the year ended
March 31, 2013 increased by ¥7,706 million from the year ended March 31, 2012. For the year ended March 31,
2012, interest revenue increased by 26% due mainly to an increase in securitized product trading in our Americas
region and interest expense increased by 24% due primarily to an increase in interest expense on securities
lending transactions. As a result, net interest revenue for the year ended March 31, 2012 increased by¥28,680 million from the year ended March 31, 2011.
In our consolidated statements of income, we include gains and losses on investments in equity securities
within revenue. We recognized gains and losses on such investments in the amount of losses of ¥16,677 million forthe year ended March 31, 2011, gains of ¥4,005 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 and ¥38,686 million for35

the year ended March 31, 2013. This line item includes both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investmentsin equity securities held for operating purposes. These investments refer to our investments in unaffiliatedcompanies, which we hold on a long-term basis in order to promote existing and potential business relationships.
Non-interest expenses increased by 9% from ¥1,450,902 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to¥1,575,901 million for the year ended March 31, 2013. The increase in non-interest expenses was caused by anincrease in other expenses by 24% from ¥496,227 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to ¥616,463 million
for the year ended March 31, 2013 due primarily to the impact of consolidating NLB for a full fiscal year. For theyear ended March 31, 2013, other expenses include ¥481,641 million related to NLB and its subsidiaries, ofwhich ¥306,570 million represented cost of real estate sales incurred in generating real estate revenues by NREH,
a subsidiary of NLB.
Non-interest expenses increased by 40% from ¥1,037,443 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to¥1,450,902 million for the year ended March 31, 2012. The increase in non-interest expenses was caused by anincrease in other expenses by 296% from ¥125,448 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to¥496,227 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, including ¥382,044 million relating to the conversion of
NLB into a subsidiary of Nomura Holdings, Inc. This amount relates to operating expense of NLB which wereconsolidated into Nomura’s group expense from acquisition date. Also, of this amount, ¥226,450 million
represented cost of real estate sales incurred in generating real estate revenues by NREH, a subsidiary of NLB.
Income before income taxes was ¥93,255 million for the year ended March 31, 2011, ¥84,957 million forthe year ended March 31, 2012 and ¥237,730 million for the year ended March 31, 2013.
We are subject to a number of different taxes in Japan and have adopted the consolidation tax system
permitted under Japanese tax law. The consolidation tax system only imposes a national tax. Since April 1, 2004,
our domestic statutory tax rate has been approximately 41%. However, as a result of the revisions of domestic tax
laws, the domestic statutory tax rates are 38% between April 1, 2012 and March 31, 2015 and 36% thereafter.
Our foreign subsidiaries are subject to the income tax rates of the countries in which they operate, which are
generally lower than those in Japan. Our effective tax rate in any one year is therefore dependent on ourgeographic mix of profits and losses and also on the specific tax treatment applicable in each location.
Income tax expense for the year ended March 31, 2013 was ¥132,039 million, representing an effective tax
rate of 55.5%. The significant factors causing the difference between the effective tax rate of 55.5% and theeffective statutory tax rate of 38% were non-deductible expenses which increased the effective tax rate by 12.8%
and the effect of the tax positions to foreign subsidiaries which increased the effective tax rate by 10.0%. The
significant factor reducing the effective tax rate was non-taxable revenue which decreased the effective tax rateby 9.3%.
Income tax expense for the year ended March 31, 2012 was ¥58,903 million, representing an effective tax
rate of 69.3%. The significant factors causing the difference between the effective tax rate of 69.3% and thestatutory tax rate of 41% were changes in domestic tax laws which increased the effective tax rate by 45.7%,
non-deductible expenses which increased the effective tax rate by 23.3% and the effect of the tax positions toforeign subsidiaries which increased the effective tax rate by 14.1%. The significant factors reducing theeffective tax rate were non-taxable revenue which decreased the effective tax rate by 29.7% and change invaluation allowance which decreased the effective tax rate by 22.5%.
Income tax expense for the year ended March 31, 2011 was ¥61,330 million, representing an effective tax
rate of 65.8%. The significant factors causing the difference between the effective tax rate of 65.8% and thestatutory tax rate of 41% were the effect of the tax positions to foreign subsidiaries which increased the effective
tax rate by 10.8%, taxable items to be added to financial profit and non-deductible expenses which increased theeffective tax rate by 5.3% and 16.6%, respectively. The significant factor reducing the effective tax rate was nontaxable revenue which decreased the effective tax rate by 8.4%.
36

Net income attributable to NHI shareholders for the year ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was¥28,661 million, ¥11,583 million and ¥107,234 million, respectively. Our return on equity for the year ended
March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was 1.4%, 0.6% and 4.9%, respectively.
Results by Business Segment
Our operating management and management reporting are prepared based on our Retail, Asset Management
and Wholesale Divisions and we disclose business segment information in accordance with this structure. Gain(loss) on investments in equity securities, our share of equity in the earnings (losses) of affiliates, impairment
losses on long-lived assets, corporate items and other financial adjustments are included as “Other” operating
results outside of business segments in our segment information. Unrealized gain (loss) on investments in equity
securities held for operating purposes is classified as a reconciling items outside of our segment information. The
following segment information should be read in conjunction with Item 4.B “Business Overview” of this annual
report and Note 23 “Segment and geographic information” in our consolidated financial statements. The
reconciliation of our segment results of operations and consolidated financial statements is set forth in Note 23“Segment and geographic information” in our consolidated financial statements.
RetailIn Retail, we continue sales activities focused on providing client consultation services and investment
proposals and receive commissions and fees from our sales activities. Additionally, we receive operational feesfrom asset management companies in connection with administration services of investment trust certificates that
we distribute. We also receive agent commissions from insurance companies for the insurance products we sell
as an agent.
Operating Results of Retail
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Non-interest revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥389,404 ¥347,385 ¥394,294
Net interest revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,029
2,873
3,631
Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

392,433
291,245

350,258
287,128

397,925
297,297

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥101,188¥ 63,130¥100,628

Net revenue for the year ended March 31, 2013 was ¥397,925 million, increasing 14% from¥350,258 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, due primarily to increasing commissions from the
distribution of investment trusts and brokerage commissions.
Net revenue for the year ended March 31, 2012 was ¥350,258 million, decreasing 11% from¥392,433 million for the year ended March 31, 2011, due primarily to decreasing commissions from the
distribution of investment trusts and brokerage commissions.
Non-interest expenses for the year ended March 31, 2013 were ¥297,297 million, increasing 4% from¥287,128 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 due to primarily to a increase in compensation and benefits
and information technology expenses.
Non-interest expenses for the year ended March 31, 2012 were ¥287,128 million, decreasing 1% from¥291,245 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 due to primarily to a decrease in compensation and benefits.
37

Income before income taxes was ¥101,188 million for the year ended March 31, 2011, ¥63,130 million forthe year ended March 31, 2012, and ¥100,628 million for the year ended March 31, 2013.
The graph below shows the revenue generated by instrument in terms of Retail non-interest revenues for theyears ended March 31, 2011, 2012, and 2013.

100%

1%

2%

2%

13%

14%

13%

46%

43%

80%

60%

41%

40%
15%

20%

26%

24%

2012

2013

22%
20%
18%
0%
2011
Bonds

Equities

Investment trusts

Asset Management

Insurance

As shown above, revenue from Equities increased from 15% for the year ended March 31, 2012 to 20% for
the year ended March 31, 2013. Revenue from Investment trusts and Asset Management decreased from 57% for
the year ended March 31, 2012 to 54% for the year ended March 31, 2013. Revenue from Bonds decreased from
26% for the year ended March 31, 2012 to 24% for the year ended March 31, 2013. Revenue from Insurance was
2% for the year ended March 31, 2013.

38

Retail Client Assets
The following graph shows amounts and details regarding the composition of retail client assets at
March 31, 2011, 2012, and 2013. Retail client assets consist of clients’ assets held in our custody and assets
relating to variable annuity insurance products.
Retail Client Assets
Trillions of yen
90.0
2.7
1.7

80.0
70.0
60.0

4.9
2.3

2.3
1.5

8.9

1.4

4.1

4.4

8.3

7.7

18.6

19.0

35.8

37.2

3/31/2011

3/31/2012

18.9

50.0
40.0
30.0

46.7
20.0
10.0
0.0
3/31/2013

Equities

Bonds

Stock investment trusts

Bond investment trusts

Overseas mutual funds

Other

Retail client assets increased from ¥72.0 trillion as of March 31, 2012 to ¥83.8 trillion as of March 31, 2013,
primarily due to an increase in the balances of our clients’ equity and equity related products by 9.5 trillion from37.2 trillion as of March 31, 2012 to 46.7 trillion as of March 13, 2013 and contribution of other products. Thebalance in our clients’ investment trusts increased by 15% from ¥13.5 trillion as of March 31, 2012 to ¥15.5
trillion as of March 31, 2013, reflecting net cash inflows by clients of ¥1.0 trillion and market appreciation of¥1.0 trillion.
Retail client assets increased from ¥70.6 trillion as of March 31, 2011 to ¥72.0 trillion as of March 31, 2012,
due to balanced business growth, centered on equities, bonds, investment trusts and insurance products. Thebalance of our clients’ investment trusts decreased by 3% from ¥13.9 trillion as of March 31, 2011 to¥13.5 trillion as of March 31, 2012, reflecting net cash inflows by clients of ¥0.7 trillion and market depreciationof ¥1.1 trillion.
Asset Management
Our Asset Management segment is conducted principally through NAM. We earn portfolio management
fees through the development and management of investment trusts, which are distributed by NSC, other brokers,
banks, Japan Post Bank Co., Ltd. and Japan Post Network Co., Ltd. We also provide investment advisory
services for pension funds and other institutional clients. Net revenues generally consist of asset management andportfolio service fees that are attributable to Asset Management.
39

Operating Results of Asset Management
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011(1)
2012
2013

Non-interest revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥62,670 ¥63,022 ¥66,489
Net interest revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,865
2,778
2,448
Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66,53546,51365,80045,281

68,93747,768

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥20,022¥20,519¥21,169(1) In April 2011, Nomura Bank (Luxembourg) S.A. in the Asset Management segment was integrated into
“Other”. Following with this integration, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform tothe current period presentation.
Net revenue increased by 5% from ¥65,800 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to ¥68,937 million
for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to an increase in assets under management.
Net revenue decreased by 1% from ¥66,535 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to ¥65,800 million
for the year ended March 31, 2012, due to a decrease in assets under management driven by the impact of
weakened market conditions.
Non-interest expenses increased by 5% from ¥45,281 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to¥47,768 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to one-off expenses related to revaluation ofcertain of our assets.
Non-interest expenses decreased by 3% from ¥46,513 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to¥45,281 million for the year ended March 31, 2012.
Income before income taxes was ¥20,022 million for the year ended March 31, 2011, ¥20,519 million forthe year ended March 31, 2012 and ¥21,169 million for the year ended March 31, 2013.
The following table sets forth assets under management of each principal Nomura entity within AssetManagement as of the dates indicated.

2011

Nomura Asset Management Co., Ltd(1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Funds Research and Technologies Co., Ltd(1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Corporate Research and Asset Management Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Private Equity Capital Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Billions of yen
March 31
2012

2013

¥27,328 ¥26,994 ¥30,685
3,020
2,810
2,920
1,841
1,504
1,821
538
579
664

Combined total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥32,727 ¥31,887 ¥36,090
Shared across group companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(8,014) (7,324) (8,190)
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥24,713¥24,563¥27,900(1) Certain prior period balances have been reclassified following the acquisition of Nomura Asset Management
Deutschland KAG mbH by Nomura Asset Management Co., Ltd in April 2012 and Nomura Funds Research
and Technologies America by Nomura Funds Research and Technologies Co., Ltd in January 2013.
Assets under management were ¥27.9 trillion as of March 31, 2013, a ¥3.2 trillion increase from March 31,
2011 and a ¥3.3 trillion increase from March 31, 2012.
40

In our investment trust business, there was an inflow into funds representing a wide range of investment
assets including Japanese equities and overseas bonds. In our investment advisory business, there was an increasein mandates from overseas clients. As a result, investment trust assets included in assets under management by
NAM were ¥17.9 trillion as of March 31, 2013, up ¥2.6 trillion, or 17%, from the previous year due to the impactof the rallied market conditions and inflows, reflecting net cash inflows by clients of ¥1.1 trillion and market
appreciation of ¥1.5 trillion. The balance of investment trusts such as Nomura High Dividend Infrastructure
Equity Premium (Currency Select Course), Nomura US High Yield Bond Fund (Currency Select Course),
Nomura Global REIT Premium (Currency Select Course) and Nomura Japan High Dividend Stock Premium(Currency Select Course) increased. Investment trust assets included in assets under management by NAM were
¥15.3 trillion as of March 31, 2012, down ¥0.7 trillion, or 4%, from the previous year due to the impact of
weakened market conditions, reflecting net cash inflows by clients of ¥0.2 trillion and market depreciation of¥0.9 trillion.
The following table shows NAM’s share, in terms of net asset value, in the Japanese asset management
market as of the dates indicated.
2011

Total of publicly offered investment trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock investment trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bond investment trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22%
17%
43%

March 31
2012

22%
17%
44%

2013

22%
18%
43%

Wholesale
The operating results of Wholesale comprise the combined results of our Global Markets and Investment
Banking businesses.
We reorganized Global Markets in December 2012, integrating Fixed Income and Equities with the aim ofenhancing cooperation between these two businesses, so that the new organization would have the flexibility
respond to recent changes in market environments and facilitate our offering of services and products rooted inclient needs.
Operating Results of Wholesale
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011(1)
2012(1)
2013

Non-interest revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥532,527 ¥428,738 ¥491,773
Net interest revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
93,607
126,311
153,083
Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

626,134
622,000

555,049
592,701

Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥¥ (37,652) ¥ 71,657

4,134

644,856
573,199(1) In accordance with the realignment in April 2012, certain prior period amounts of Wholesale and Other havebeen reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Net revenue increased by 16% from ¥555,049 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to¥644,856 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily driven by the stronger revenue in Fixed Income
throughout the year due to robust domestic revenues and the expansion of overseas franchises and the recovery of
Equities due to market comeback in the second half of this fiscal year, when equity markets saw increased
activity, partially offset by the decline of revenue in Investment Banking.
41

Net revenue decreased by 11% from ¥626,134 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to¥555,049 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, due primarily to the volatile economical and financial
market conditions in Europe. Specifically, these conditions contributed to low client activity, which among otherfactors caused a decrease in revenues in Equities, and lower equity capital markets and M&A activity, which
negatively impacted revenues in Investment Banking.
Non-interest expenses decreased by 3% from ¥592,701 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to¥573,199 million for the year ended March 31, 2013 primarily due to the additional cost reduction program
started in the second quarter for the year ended March 31, 2013 which is progressing on schedule.
Non-interest expenses decreased by 5% from ¥622,000 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to¥592,701 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 as a result of the initial cost reduction program started in thethird quarter of the year ended March 31, 2012.
Income before income taxes was ¥4,134 million for the year ended March 31, 2011, loss before income
taxes was ¥37,652 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 and income before income taxes was¥71,657 million for the year ended March 31, 2013.
Global Markets
We have a proven track record in sales and trading of bonds, stocks, and foreign exchange, as well asderivatives based on these financial instruments, mainly to domestic and overseas institutional investors. In
response to the increasingly diverse and complex needs of our clients, we are building up our trading and productorigination capabilities to offer superior products not only to domestic and overseas institutional investors but
also to Retail and Asset Management. This cross-divisional approach also extends to Investment Banking, whereclose collaboration leads to high value-added solutions for our clients. These ties enable us to identify the typesof products of interest to investors and then to develop and deliver products that meet their needs. We continue todevelop extensive ties with institutional investors in Japan and international markets; wealthy and affluent
investors, public-sector agencies, and regional financial institutions in Japan; and government agencies, financial
institutions, and corporations around the world.
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011(1)
2012(1)2013

Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥508,066 ¥455,756 ¥560,429
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
493,291
470,360
459,715
Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 14,775¥ (14,604) ¥100,714(1) Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Net revenue increased from ¥455,756 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to ¥560,429 million for theyear ended March 31, 2013. In Fixed Income, net revenue increased from ¥274.5 billion for the year ended
March 31, 2012 to ¥378.7 billion for the year ended March 31, 2013. In the fluctuating market conditions
throughout the year, stable client flow and high research capability drove revenue growth backed by appropriate
risk management. As a result, we recorded significant revenue growth across products, especially, Rates andSecuritized Products, and across regions. In Equities, net revenue increased from ¥181.2 billion for the year
ended March 31, 2012 to ¥181.7 billion for the year ended March 31, 2013. The first half of the fiscal year saw
low earnings from client flow due to low sales volume in the markets. In the second half of the fiscal year, equity
markets turned up starting from the late in 2012, due in part to the change in government in Japan and the effectof monetary policies by the BOJ, resulting in greatly increased earnings from our equity business in Japan.
42

Net revenue decreased from ¥508,066 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to ¥455,756 million forthe year ended March 31, 2012. In Fixed Income, net revenue decreased from ¥281.3 billion for the year ended
March 31, 2011 to ¥274.5 billion for the year ended March 31, 2012. In Equities, net revenue decreased from
¥226.8 billion for the year ended March 31, 2011 to ¥181.2 billion for the year ended March 31, 2012. We
experienced a challenging fiscal year as exchange volumes decreased and client activity remained low for muchof the year. Execution services performed in-line with declining market volume, while derivatives waschallenged in some products, but showed resilience with innovative products in Japan along with tailoredsolutions for industrial corporations globally.
Non-interest expenses decreased by 2% from ¥470,360 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to¥459,715 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily driven by the additional cost reduction program
started in the second quarter for the year ended March 31, 2013.
Non-interest expenses decreased by 5% from ¥493,291 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to¥470,360 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, primarily due to cost savings initiated by the cost reduction
program which started in the third quarter for the year ended March 31, 2012.
Income before income taxes was ¥14,775 million for the year ended March 31, 2011, loss before income
taxes was ¥14,604 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 and ¥100,714 million for the year ended March 31,
2013.
Investment Banking
We provide a broad range of investment banking services, such as underwriting and advisory activities, to adiverse range of corporations, financial institutions, sovereigns, investment funds and other entities. We
underwrite offerings of debt, equity and other financial instruments in Asia, Europe, U.S. and other major
financial markets. We have been enhancing our M&A and financial advisory expertise to secure morehigh-profile deals both across and within regions. We develop and forge solid relationships with these clients on
a long-term basis by providing extensive resources in a seamless fashion to facilitate bespoke solutions.
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011(1)
2012(1)
2013

Investment Banking (Gross) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allocation to Other divisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥185,011 ¥141,678 ¥143,001(82,114) (66,284) (70,990)

Investment Banking (Net) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

102,897
15,17175,39423,89972,011
12,416

Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

118,068
128,70999,293
122,341

84,427
113,484

Loss before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ (10,641) ¥ (23,048) ¥ (29,057)(1) Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Net revenue decreased from ¥99,293 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to ¥84,427 million for theyear ended March 31, 2013. Investment banking (net) revenue decreased from ¥75,394 million for the year ended
March 31, 2012 to ¥72,011 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, year due to globally sluggish equity
capital markets and M&A activity, especially in the first half of the fiscal year. Other revenue decreased from
¥23,899 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to ¥12,416 million for the year ended March 31, 2013,
primarily due to realized gains on equity securities of certain investee companies recognized during the year
ended March, 2012. For the year ended March 31, 2013, realized gains from investments in Japan were ¥0.4
billion and unrealized losses from investments in Japan were ¥10.7 billion. Realized gains from the Terra Firma
43

Investments were ¥18.2 billion and unrealized losses from Terra Firma Investments were ¥0.6 billion. Realized
gains were primarily due to the gains on sale of Annington. Unrealized losses equated primarily to the additional
losses booked against investments in the leisure and utilities sectors.
Net revenue decreased from ¥118,068 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to ¥99,293 million for theyear ended March 31, 2012. Investment banking (net) revenue decreased from ¥102,897 million for the year
ended March 31, 2011 to ¥75,394 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, as the business environment
proved challenging, especially in equity capital markets and M&A. Other revenue increased from
¥15,171 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to ¥23,899 million for the year ended March 31, 2012. For
the year ended March 31, 2012, realized gains from investments in Japan were ¥33.7 billion and unrealized
losses from investments in Japan were ¥12.3 billion. Realized gains from the Terra Firma Investments were ¥0.5
billion and unrealized gains from Terra Firma Investments were ¥4.8 billion. Realized and unrealized gains arose
primarily on residential real estate and utilities sectors while unrealized losses are related to investments in theleisure and services sectors. For the year ended March 31, 2011, realized gains from investments in Japan were¥11.1 billion. Realized losses from the Terra Firma Investments were ¥3.4 billion and unrealized gains from the
Terra Firma Investments were ¥14.6 billion. Realized and unrealized gains arose primarily on investments in theresidential real estate, leisure and utilities sectors while realized losses are related to the exit of a media business.
Non-interest expenses decreased by 7% from ¥122,341 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 to¥113,484 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to cost savings from the additional cost
reduction program started in the third quarter for the year ended March 31, 2013.
Non-interest expenses decreased by 5% from ¥128,709 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 to¥122,341 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, primarily due to the initial cost reduction program started in
the third quarter for the year ended March 31, 2012.
Loss before income taxes was ¥10,641 million for the year ended March 31, 2011, ¥23,048 million for theyear ended March 31, 2012 and ¥29,057 million for the year ended March 31, 2013.
Other Operating Results
Other operating results include net gain (loss) related to economic hedging transactions, realized gain (loss)
on investments in equity securities held for operating purposes, equity in earnings of affiliates, corporate items,
and other financial adjustments. See Note 23 “Segment and geographic information” to our consolidated
financial statements. In accordance with the realignment in April 2012, certain prior period amounts of wholesaleand other have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
Loss before income taxes in other operating results was ¥15,193 million for the year ended March 31, 2011,
income before income taxes in other operating result was ¥35,153 million for the year ended March 31, 2012 and¥6,591 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, respectively.
Other operating results for the year ended March 31, 2013 include losses from changes in the fair value ofthe financial liabilities, for which the fair value option was elected, attributable to the change in ourcreditworthiness of ¥30.7 billion, the negative impact of our own creditworthiness on derivative liabilities which
resulted in losses of ¥29.1 billion and gains from changes in counterparty credit spreads of ¥10.0 billion.
Other operating results for the year ended March 31, 2012 include gains from changes in the fair value ofthe financial liabilities, for which the fair value option was elected, attributable to the change in ourcreditworthiness of ¥16.7 billion, the negative impact of our own creditworthiness on derivative liabilities which
resulted in gains of ¥10.4 billion and losses from changes in counterparty credit spreads of ¥16.1 billion.
44

Summary of Regional Contribution
For a summary of our net revenue, income (loss) before income taxes and long-lived assets by geographic
region, see Note 23 “Segment and geographic information” in our consolidated financial statements included inthis annual report.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
Many of our business activities are subject to statutory capital requirements, including those of Japan, theU.S., the U.K. and certain other countries in which we operate.
Translation Exposure
A significant portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than yen—most significantly,
U.S. dollars, British pounds and Euros. We prepare financial statements of each of our consolidated subsidiaries
in its functional currency, which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity
operates. Translation exposure is the risk arising from the effect of fluctuations in exchange rates on the net
assets of our foreign subsidiaries. Translation exposure is not recognized in our consolidated statements ofincome unless and until we dispose of, or liquidate, the relevant foreign subsidiary.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Use of estimates
In preparing the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, management makes
estimates regarding certain financial instrument and investment valuations, the outcome of litigation and tax
examinations, the recovery of the carrying value of goodwill, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the realizationof deferred tax assets and other matters that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as well as thedisclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgment andavailable information. Therefore, actual results may differ from estimates, which could have a material impact on
the consolidated financial statements, and it is possible that such adjustments could occur in the near term.
Fair value for financial instruments
A significant amount of our financial instruments are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value
recognized through the consolidated statements of income or the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income on a recurring basis. Use of fair value is either specifically required under U.S. GAAP or we make anelection to use fair value for certain eligible items under the fair value option.
Other financial assets and financial liabilities are carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, where theprimary measurement basis is not fair value. Fair value is only used in specific circumstances after initialrecognition, such as to measure impairment.
In accordance with Accounting Standard Codification™ (“ASC”) 820 “Fair Value Measurements andDisclosures”, all financial instruments measured at fair value have been categorized into a three-level hierarchy
based on the transparency of valuation inputs used to establish fair value.
Level 1:
Unadjusted quoted prices for identical financial instruments in active markets accessible by Nomura at themeasurement date.
Level 2:
Quoted prices in inactive markets or prices containing other inputs which are observable, either directly or
indirectly. Valuation techniques using observable inputs reflect assumptions used by market participants inpricing financial instruments and are based on data obtained from independent market sources at themeasurement date.
45

Level 3:
Unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement of the financial instrument. Valuation
techniques using unobservable inputs reflect management’s assumptions about the estimates used by othermarket participants in valuing similar financial instruments. These valuation techniques are developed based on
the best available information at the measurement date.
The availability of inputs observable in the market varies by product and can be affected by a variety offactors. Significant factors include, but are not restricted to the prevalence of similar products in the market,
especially for customized products, how established the product is in the market, for example, whether it is a new
product or is relatively mature, and the reliability of information provided in the market which would depend, forexample, on the frequency and volume of current data. A period of significant change in the market may reduce
the availability of observable data. Under such circumstances, financial instruments may be reclassified into alower level in the fair value hierarchy.
Significant judgments used in determining the classification of financial instruments include the nature of
the market in which the product would be traded, the underlying risks, the type and liquidity of market data
inputs and the nature of observed transactions for similar instruments.
Where valuation models include the use of parameters which are less observable or unobservable in themarket, significant management judgment is used in establishing fair value. The valuations for Level 3 financial
instruments, therefore, involve a greater degree of judgment than those valuations for Level 1 or Level 2
financial instruments.
Certain criteria management use to determine whether a market is active or inactive include the number oftransactions, the frequency that pricing is updated by other market participants, the variability of price quotes
among market participants, and the amount of publicly available information.
Level 3 financial assets excluding derivatives as a proportion of total financial assets excluding derivatives,
carried at fair value on a recurring basis was 3% as of March 31, 2013 as listed below:

Financial assets measured at fair value(Excluding derivative assets) . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Level 1

Level 2

Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
Counterparty
and CashCollateral
Level 3
Netting¥8,638728
830¥ 8,739
26,47926,296

¥546
368
395

¥

—
(25,684)(25,636)

Total¥17,923
1,891
1,885

The proportionof Level 3

3%

See Note 2 “Fair value measurements” in our consolidated financial statements.
Private equity businessAll private equity investments made by investment company subsidiaries pursuant to the provisions of
ASC 946 “Financial Services—Investment Companies” (“ASC 946”) are accounted for at fair value, withchanges in fair value recognized through the consolidated statements of income.
The valuation of unlisted private equity investments requires significant management judgment because theinvestments, by their nature, have little or no price transparency. Private equity investments are initially carried atcost as an approximation of fair value. Adjustments to carrying value are made if there is third-party evidence ofa change in value. Adjustments are also made, in the absence of thirdparty transactions, if it is determined that46

the expected exit price of the investment is different from carrying value. In reaching that determination, Nomura
primarily uses either a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) or market multiple valuation technique. A DCF valuation
technique incorporates estimated future cash flows to be generated from the underlying investee, as adjusted for
an appropriate growth rate discounted at a weighted average cost of capital. Market multiple valuation techniques
include comparables such as Enterprise Value/earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
ratios, Price/Earnings ratios, Price/Book ratios, Price/Embedded Value ratios and other multiples based onrelationships between numbers reported in the financial statements of the investee and the price of comparable
companies. A liquidity discount may also be applied to either a DCF or market multiple valuation to reflect the
specific characteristics of the investee. Where possible these valuations are compared with the operating cash
flows and financial performance of the companies or properties relative to budgets or projections, price/earnings
data for similar quoted investee, trends within sectors and/or regions and any specific rights or terms associatedwith the investment, such as conversion features and liquidation preferences. Private equity investments are
generally classified as Level 3 since the valuation inputs such as those mentioned above are usuallyunobservable.
Any changes to valuations are then stress tested to assess the impact of particular risk factors in order toestablish the final estimated valuation. For more information on our private equity activities, see “Private Equity
Business” below.
Derivative contracts
We use a variety of derivative financial instruments including futures, forwards, swaps and options, fortrading and non-trading purposes. All derivatives are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognizedeither through the consolidated statements of income or the consolidated statements of comprehensive income
depending on the purpose for which the derivatives are used.
Fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments entered into under a legally enforceable masternetting agreement are offset in the consolidated balance sheets and fair value amounts recognized for the right toreclaim cash collateral (a receivable) and the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) are also offset
against net derivative liabilities and net derivative assets, respectively.
Derivative contracts consist of listed derivatives and OTC derivatives. The fair value of listed derivatives
are generally determined from quoted market prices. OTC derivatives are valued using valuation models. Listed
derivative and OTC derivative assets and liabilities after netting are shown below:
Billions of yen
March 31, 2012
AssetsLiabilities

Listed derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTC derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 304
1,056

¥ 334
974

¥1,360¥1,308Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
AssetsLiabilities

Listed derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTC derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

47

¥ 443
1,448

¥ 559
1,326

¥1,891¥1,885

The fair value of OTC derivative assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2013 by remaining contractual
maturity are shown below:

Less than
1 year

OTC derivative assets . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTC derivative liabilities . . . . . . . . . .

¥796
916

Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
Years to Maturity
1 to 33 to 55 to 7 More than
years
years
years
7 years¥1,015790¥1,049
1,056

¥860
767

¥2,854
2,611

Cross-maturity
netting(1)Totalfair value¥(5,126)(4,814)¥1,4481,326(1) This column shows the impact of netting derivative assets with derivative liabilities for the same
counterparty across maturity band categories. Derivative assets and derivative liabilities with the same
counterparty in the same maturity category are netted within the maturity category. This column also
includes cash collateral netting with the same counterparty.
The fair value of derivative contracts includes adjustments for credit risk, both with regards to counterparty
credit risk on positions held and our own creditworthiness on positions issued. We realize gains or losses relating
to changes in credit risk on our derivative contracts together with the movements of trading positions, which
include derivatives, that are expected to mitigate the above mentioned impact of changes in credit risk.
Goodwill
Goodwill is recognized upon completion of a business combination as the difference between the purchaseprice and the fair value of the net assets acquired. Subsequent to initial recognition, goodwill is not amortized but
is tested for impairment at a reporting unit level during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more frequently
during interim periods if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Nomura’s reporting units areat one level below its business segments.
Nomura tests goodwill of each separate reporting unit by initially qualitatively assessing whether events andcircumstances indicate that it is more-likely-than-not (i.e. greater than 50%) that a reporting unit’s fair value isless than its carrying amount. If such assessment indicates fair value is not less than the carrying value, thereporting unit is deemed not to be impaired and no further analysis is required. If it is more-likely-than-not thatthe fair value of the reporting unit is below its carrying value, a quantitative two-step impairment test is thenperformed.
In the first step, the current estimated fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying value,
including goodwill. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, then a second step is performed. In the second
step, the implied current fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is determined by comparing the fair value ofthe reporting unit to the fair value of the net assets of the reporting unit, as if the reporting unit were being
acquired in a business combination. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of goodwill exceeds
its implied current fair value.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, we recognized a goodwill impairment loss on goodwill relating to theWholesale segment of ¥8,293 million within Non-interest expenses—Other in the consolidated statements ofincome, due to a decline in fair value of a reporting unit in the Wholesale segment caused by the prolonged
economic downturn. The fair value was determined based on DCF.
Assets and Liabilities Associated with Investment and Financial Services Business
Exposure to Certain Financial Instruments and Counterparties
Challenging market conditions continue to impact numerous products including securitization products andleveraged finance to which we have certain exposures. We also have exposures to Special Purpose Entities(“SPEs”) and others in the normal course of business.
48

Securitization Products
Our exposure to securitization products consists of commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”),
residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), commercial real estate-backed securities and othersecuritization products. We hold these securitization products in connection with securitization, financing,trading and other activities. The following table provides a summary of our exposure to securitization products
by geographic region of the underlying collateral as of March 31, 2013.
Millions of yen
March 31, 2013
Japan

EuropeAmericas

Asia and
Oceania

Total(1)

CMBS(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RMBS(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securitization products(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥

6,014
38,0772,500
114,127¥15,324
33,200—8,831¥ 63,866
309,424—
138,204

¥ 571
—
—
1,867

¥ 85,775
380,701
2,500
263,029

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥160,718¥57,355¥511,494¥2,438¥732,005(1) The balances shown exclude certain CMBS of ¥20,551 million for which we transferred financial assets tosecuritization vehicles where such transfers were accounted for as secured financings rather than sales under
ASC 860, “Transfers and Servicing” (“ASC 860”), and in which we have no continuing economic exposure
because the beneficial interests in the vehicles have been sold to third parties.
(2) We have ¥10,617 million exposure, as whole loans and commitments, to U.S. CMBS-related business as ofMarch 31, 2013.
(3) The RMBS balance for Americas excludes mortgage pass-through securities and U.S. governmentguaranteed collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO”) of ¥2,343,620 million, because their credit risks
are considered minimal.
(4) Includes collateralized loan obligations (“CLO”), collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) and asset-backed
securities (“ABS”) such as those secured on credit card loans, auto loans, student loans and home equity
loans.
The following table provides our exposure to CMBS by geographic region and the external credit ratings of
the underlying collateral as of March 31, 2013. Ratings are based on the lowest ratings given by Standard &Poor’s Financial Services LLC, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd., Japan Credit Rating Agency,
Ltd. or Rating and Investment Information, Inc. as of March 31, 2013.

AAA

AA

A

Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ —¥ —Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—59
Americas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,797 8,651
Asia and Oceania . . . . . . . . . .
571
—

¥

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥10,792¥11,368¥8,710Millions of yen
March 31, 2013
BBB
BB

709
4,745
5,338
—

¥

—
3,681
6,695
—

¥10,376B

Not rated

Total

¥

394
2,989
12,071
—

¥

96
2,950
11,430—¥ 4,815
900
8,884
—

¥ 6,014
15,324
63,866571¥15,454¥14,476¥14,599¥85,775

Leveraged Finance
We provide loans to clients in connection with leveraged buy-outs and leveraged buy-ins. As this type offinancing is usually initially provided through a commitment, we have both funded and unfunded exposures onthese transactions.

49

The following table sets forth our exposure to leveraged finance by geographic location of the target
company as of March 31, 2013.
Millions of yen
March 31, 2013
FundedUnfunded
Total

Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Americas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asia and Oceania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥33,468
5,166
1,482

¥28,164
49,990797¥ 61,632
55,156
2,279

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥40,116¥78,951¥119,067

Special Purpose Entities (“SPEs”)
Our involvement with these entities includes structuring, underwriting, as well as, subject to prevailingmarket conditions, distributing and selling debt instruments and beneficial interests issued by these entities. In
the normal course of securitization and equity derivative activities business, we also act as a transferor of
financial assets to, and underwriter, distributor and seller of repackaged financial instruments issued by these
entities. We retain, purchase and sell variable interests in SPEs in connection with our market-making, investingand structuring activities. Our other types of involvement with SPEs include guarantee agreements and derivative
contracts.
For further discussion on Nomura’s involvement with variable interest entities (“VIEs”), see Note 8“Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities” in our consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Developments
See Note 1 “Summary of accounting policies: New accounting pronouncements adopted during the current
year” in our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.
Private Equity BusinessWe make private equity investments primarily in Japan and Europe.
Private equity investments made by certain entities which we consolidates under either a voting interest or
variable interest model which are investment companies pursuant to the provisions of ASC 946 (“investmentcompany subsidiaries”) are accounted for at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through theconsolidated statements of income. Investment company accounting applied by each of these investmentcompany subsidiaries is retained in these consolidated financial statements within this annual report.
These entities make private equity investments solely for capital appreciation, current income or both rather
than to generate strategic operating benefits to us. In accordance with our investment policies, non-investmentcompanies within the group may not make investments in entities engaged in non-core businesses if suchinvestments would result in consolidation or application of the equity method of accounting. Such investments
may generally only be made by investment company subsidiaries. Non-core businesses are defined as thoseengaged in activities other than our business segments.
We also have a subsidiary which is not an investment company but which makes investments in entities
engaged in our core businesses. These investments are made for capital appreciation or current income purposesor both and are also carried at fair value, either because of election of the fair value option or other U.S. GAAP
requirements.
50

Private equity business in Japan
We have an established private equity business in Japan, which has been operated primarily through awholly-owned subsidiary, Nomura Principal Finance Co., Ltd (“NPF”). NPF is an investment company
subsidiary pursuant to the provisions of ASC 946 and therefore has carried all of its investments at fair value,with changes in fair value recognized through the consolidated statements of income.
Since its inception in 2000, NPF had made investments in 21 entities, however, we exited from the majorityof these investments for the year ended March 31, 2012 and as a result, the fair value of its investment portfolio
as of March 31, 2012 was ¥789 million. And, we exited from the remaining investments held by NPF during theyear ended March 31, 2013, therefore, the fair value of its investment portfolio was ¥nil as of March 31, 2013.
We also make private equity investments through another wholly-owned subsidiary, Nomura Financial
Partners Co., Ltd. (“NFP”). NFP is not an investment company subsidiary as it invests in entities engaged in ourcore business. We elected the fair value option to account for its 47.0% investment in the common stock ofAshikaga Holdings
Private equity business in Europe
In Europe, our private equity investments primarily comprise legacy investments made by its former
Principal Finance Group (“PFG”) now managed by Terra Firma (collectively referred to as the “Terra Firma
Investments”), investments in other funds managed by Terra Firma (“Other Terra Firma Funds”) and throughother investment company subsidiaries (“Other Investments”).
Terra Firma Investments
Following a review to determine the optimum structure for our European private equity business, on
March 27, 2002, we restructured PFG and, as a result, contributed its investments in certain of its remaining
investee companies to Terra Firma Capital Partners I (“TFCP I”), a limited partnership which is engaged in theprivate equity business, in exchange for a limited partnership interest. Terra Firma Investments (GP) Limited, thegeneral partner of TFCP I, which is independent of us, assumed the management and control of theseinvestments, together with one other PFG investment, Annington Holdings plc (“Annington”), which due tocontractual restrictions was not transferred to the partnership.
With effect from March 27, 2002, we ceased consolidating the Terra Firma Investments and accounted for
those investments at fair value in accordance with ASC 946.
The Terra Firma Investments are held by entities which are investment company subsidiaries and therefore
we continue to account for these investments at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through theconsolidated statements of income.
In December 2012, we completed the sale of Annington to Terra Firma and as a result, the fair value of the
Terra Firma Investments fell from ¥102,649 million as of March 31, 2012 to ¥nil as of March 31, 2013.
Other Terra Firma Funds
We are a 10% investor in a ¥234 billion private equity fund (“TFCP II”) and a 2% investor in a ¥623 billion
private equity fund (“TFCP III”), also raised and managed by Terra Firma Capital Partners Limited.
Our total commitment for TFCP II was originally ¥23,362 million and reduced to ¥4,001 million as a resultof adjustments for recyclable distributions. As of March 31, 2013, ¥3,957 million had been drawn down forinvestments.
51

For TFCP III, our total commitment was ¥11,793 million and ¥11,094 million had been drawn down forinvestments as of March 31, 2013.
The investments in TFCP II and TFCP III are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognizedthrough the consolidated statements of income.
Other Investments
We also make private equity investments in Europe through wholly-owned subsidiaries and otherconsolidated entities which have third party pooling of funds. Certain of these entities are investment company
subsidiaries and therefore all of their investments are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognizedthrough the consolidated statements of income.
Deferred Tax Assets Information
Details of deferred tax assets and liabilities
Details of deferred tax assets and liabilities reported within Other assets—Other and Other liabilities
respectively in the consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2013 are as follows:
Millions of yen
March 31, 2013

Deferred tax assets
Depreciation, amortization and valuation of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in subsidiaries and affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation of financial instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued pension and severance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued expenses and provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 10,043
177,175
146,800
17,999106,436
341,177
5,228

Gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less—Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

804,858(522,220)

Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

282,638

Deferred tax liabilities
Investments in subsidiaries and affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation of financial instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

88,63153,3672,960
21,9504,210

Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

171,118

Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 111,520

Calculation method of deferred tax assets
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we recognize deferred tax assets to the extent we believe that it is more
likely than not that a benefit will be realized. A valuation allowance is provided for tax benefits available to us,which are not deemed more likely than not to be realized.

52

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Funding and Liquidity Management
Overview
We define liquidity risk as the potential inability to meet financial obligations as they become due. This risk
could arise from an inability to access the secured or unsecured debt markets, a deterioration in our credit ratings,
a failure to manage unplanned changes in funding requirements, a failure to liquidate assets quickly and withminimal loss in value, or changes in regulatory capital restrictions which may prevent the free flow of funds
between different group entities. Liquidity risk could be due both to Nomura-specific and market-wide events.
Liquidity risk management policy is based on liquidity risk appetite which the Group Integrated Risk
Management Committee formulates upon delegation by the Executive Management Board (“EMB”). Our
primary objective for liquidity risk management is to ensure continuous liquidity across market cycles andperiods of market stress, and to ensure that all funding requirements and unsecured debt obligations that fall due
within one year can be met without additional unsecured funding or forced liquidation of assets.
We have in place a number of Liquidity Risk Management frameworks that enable us to achieve ourprimary liquidity objective. These frameworks include (1) Centralized Control of Residual Cash; (2) Appropriate
Funding and Diversification of Funding Sources and Maturities Commensurate with the Composition of Assets;(3) Management of Credit Lines to Nomura Group Entities; (4) Implementation of Liquidity Stress Tests; and(5) Contingency Funding Plan.
Our EMB has the authority to make decisions concerning the group liquidity management. The Chief
Financial Officer (“CFO”) has the operational authority and responsibility over our liquidity management basedon decisions made by the EMB.
1.

Centralized Control of Residual Cash.

We centrally control residual cash held at Nomura Group entities for effective utilization purposes. As forthe usage of funds, we manage the overall level of unsecured funding and set internal limits on the additionalamount of unsecured funding available across Nomura Group. The limit for unsecured funding is set by the EMB
and monitored closely by Global Treasury.
In order to enable us to transfer funds smoothly among group entities, we limit issuance of securities byregulated broker-dealers or banking entities. We actively seek to concentrate issuance of all long-term unsecured,
non-deposit funding instruments at either Nomura or unregulated issuing entities. The primary benefits of thisstrategy include cost minimization, wider investor name recognition and greater flexibility in providing funding
to various subsidiaries across Nomura Group.
2. Appropriate Funding and Diversification of Funding Sources and Maturities Commensurate with theComposition of Assets.
We seek to maintain a surplus of long-term debt and equity above the cash capital requirements of ourassets. This enables us to fund our operations for at least one year in a stress event, without needing to raise
additional unsecured funding or forcing the liquidation of assets. The amount of liquidity required is based on aninternal model which incorporates the following requirements:(i)

Our ability to finance assets using secured funding, including repurchase agreements and securities
lending transactions. The cash capital requirements are calculated using conservative estimates of theassets secured borrowing power in stressed scenarios.

(ii) Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets, property, equipment and other illiquid assets.
(iii) Collateral requirements on derivative contracts arising as a result of a two-notch downgrade in ourcredit rating.
53

Collateral requirements to support potential increased intraday collateral requirements from ourclearers and settlement agents arising as a result of a two-notch downgrade in our credit rating.
In addition, other unencumbered assets held at exchanges for chaining requirements are also fundedwith long-term liquidity.
(iv) Commitments to lend to external counterparties based on the probability of drawdown.
(v) Capital or other forms of financing in our regulated subsidiaries that is in excess of their long-term cash
capital requirements.
Our internal model takes into account legal, regulatory and tax restrictions that may impact the ability tofreely transfer of liquidity across the entities within the group.
We seek to achieve diversification of our funding sources by market, instrument type, investors and currency
in order to reduce our reliance on any one funding source and reduce refinancing risk. We benefit by distributing asignificant portion of our debt through our retail and institutional sales force to a diversified global investor base.
We diversify funding by issuing various types of debt instruments—these include both structured loans andnotes. Structured notes are debt obligations with returns linked to other debt or equity securities, indices,
currencies or commodities. We issue structured notes in order to increase the diversity of our debt instruments.
We typically hedge the returns we are obliged to pay with derivative positions and/or the underlying assets tomaintain funding consistency with our unsecured long term debt. The proportion of our non-yen denominatedlong-term debt slightly increased to 29.7% of total term debt outstanding as of March 31, 2013 from 28.0% as ofMarch 31, 2012.
2.1

Short-Term Unsecured Debt

Our short-term unsecured debt consists primarily of short-term bank borrowings (including long-term bankborrowings maturing within one year), commercial paper, deposits at banking entities, certificates of deposit andbonds and notes maturing within one year. Deposits at banking entities and certificates of deposit comprisecustomer deposits and certificates of deposit held by our banking subsidiaries.
Our total short-term unsecured debt decreased ¥715.8 billion to ¥2,293.3 billion as of March 31, 2013 from¥3,009.1 billion as of March 31, 2012 mainly due to a ¥629.4 billion decrease in short-term bank borrowings to¥621.3 billion as of March 31, 2013 from ¥1,250.7 billion as of March 31, 2012. The average outstandingbalance of commercial paper was ¥262.0 billion for the period ended in March 31, 2013.
The following table presents an analysis of our short-term unsecured debt by type of financial liability as ofMarch 31, 2012 and 2013:
Billions of yen
March 3120122013

Short-term bank borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deposit at banking entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bonds and notes maturing within one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,250.7
99.0
315.6
589.8
234.7
519.3

¥ 621.3
42.4
296.7
781.4
214.5
337.0

Total short-term unsecured debt(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥3,009.1¥2,293.3(1) Short-term unsecured debt includes the current portion of long-term unsecured debt.
54

2.2

Long-Term Unsecured Debt

We also routinely issue long term-debt in various maturities and currencies to maintain a long-term funding
surplus, and to also achieve both cost-effective funding and a maturity profile where the average duration of ourdebt is sufficient to meet our long-term cash capital requirements.
Our long-term unsecured debt includes senior and subordinated debt issued through U.S registered shelfofferings and our U.S. registered medium-term note programs, our Euro medium-term note programs, registeredshelf offerings in Japan and various other bond programs.
As a globally competitive financial service group in Japan, we have access to multiple markets worldwide
and major funding centers. The Company, NSC, Nomura Europe Finance N.V. (“NEF”) and Nomura BankInternational plc (“NBI”) are the main group entities that borrow externally, issue debt instruments and engage inother funding activities. By raising funds to match the currencies and liquidities of our assets or by using foreignexchange swaps as may be necessary, we pursue optimization of our funding structures.
We use a wide range of products and currencies to ensure that our funding is efficient and well diversified
across markets and investor types. Our unsecured senior debt is issued without financial covenants, such ascovenants related to adverse changes in our credit ratings, cash flows, results of operations or financial ratios,
which could trigger an increase in our cost of financing or accelerate the maturity of the debt.
The following table presents an analysis of our long-term unsecured debt by type of financial liability as ofMarch 31, 2012 and 2013.
Billions of yen
March 312012
2013

Long-term deposit at banking entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term bank borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bonds and notes(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total long-term unsecured debt total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥80.2
2,589.1
144.4
3,559.3¥6,373.0¥

76.2
2,173.7
133.9
4,073.5¥6,457.3

NHI shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥2,107.2¥2,294.4(1) Excludes “long-term bonds and notes issued by consolidated VIEs” that meet the definition of Variable
Interest Entities (“VIEs”) under ASC 810, “Consolidation” (“ASC 810”) and secured financing transactions
recognized within long-term borrowings as a result of transfers of financial assets that are accounted for as
financings rather than sales in accordance with ASC 860.
Our long-term debt increased ¥84.3 billion to ¥6,457.3 billion as of March 31, 2013 from ¥6,373.0 billion asof March 31, 2012, primarily due to ¥514.2 billion increase in bonds and notes to ¥4,073.5 billion as ofMarch 31, 2013 from ¥3,559.3 billion as of March 31, 2012. The increase was partly offset by a ¥415.4 billion
decrease in long-term bank borrowings to ¥2,173.7 billion as of March 31, 2013 from ¥2,589.1 billion as ofMarch 31, 2012.
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, Nomura issued ¥539.6 billion of domestic and global senior bonds.
2.3

Maturity Profile

We also seek to maintain an average maturity for plain vanilla instruments greater than or equal to three
years. The average maturity for plain vanilla debt securities and borrowings with maturities longer than one year
was 3.80 years as of March 31, 2013. A major part of our medium-term notes are structured and linked to interest
55

or equity, indices, currencies or commodities. Conditions for calling notes linked to indices are individually
determined. These maturities are evaluated based on our internal model and monitored by Global Treasury.
Maturities for plain vanilla debt securities and borrowings are evaluated based on contractual maturities. Where
there is a possibility that notes may be called prior to their scheduled maturity date, maturities are based on ourinternal stress option adjusted model. This model values the embedded optionality under stress market conditions
in order to determine when the note is likely to be called.
On this basis, the average maturity of structured notes (notes with maturities longer than one year) was
7.95 years as of March 31, 2013. The average maturity of our entire long-term debt portfolio, including plain
vanilla debt securities and borrowings, was 5.19 years as of March 31, 2013. The graph below shows the
distribution of maturities of our outstanding long-term debt securities and borrowings.
Long-Term Debt Maturity Profile
March 31, 2013

Billions of yen

3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500

Later than Apr 2018

Jan-Mar 2018

Oct-Dec 2017

Jul-Sep 2017

Apr-Jun 2017

Jan-Mar 2017

Oct-Dec 2016

July-Sep 2016

Apr-Jun 2016

Jan-Mar 2016

Oct-Dec 2015

Jul-Sep 2015

Apr-Jun 2015

Jan-Mar 2015

Oct-Dec 2014

Jul-Sep 2014

Apr-Jun 2014

Jan-Mar 2014

Oct-Dec 2013

Jul-Sep 2013

Apr-Jun 2013

0Redemption schedule is individually estimated by considering the probability of redemption.

2.4

Secured Borrowings

We typically fund our trading activities on a secured basis through secured borrowings, repurchaseagreements and Japanese “Gensaki Repo” transactions. Repo transactions involve the selling of government andgovernment agency securities under agreements with clients to repurchase these securities from clients. Japanese“Gensaki Repo” transactions have no margin requirements or substitution right. We believe these funding
activities in the secured markets are more cost-efficient and less credit-rating sensitive than financing in theunsecured market. Also, repurchase agreements tend to be short-term, often overnight. We manage the liquidity
risks arising from secured funding by transacting with a diverse group of global counterparties, deliveringvarious types of securities collateral and actively seeking for long-term agreements. For more detail of secured
borrowings and repurchase agreements, see Note 6 “Collateralized transactions” in our consolidated financial
statements.
3.

Management of Credit Lines to Nomura Group entities

We maintain committed facility agreements with financial institutions for Nomura Group entities in order toprovide contingent financing sources. Total unused committed facilities decreased ¥60.3 billion to ¥78.0 billion56

as of March 31, 2013 from ¥138.3 billion as of March 31, 2012. We have structured facilities to ensure that thematurity dates of these facilities are distributed evenly throughout the year in order to prevent excessive
maturities of facilities in any given period. While the ability to borrow under these facilities is subject tocustomary lending conditions and covenants, we do not believe that any of the covenant requirements will impair
our ability to draw on the facilities. We occasionally test the effectiveness of our drawdown procedures.
4.

Implementation of Liquidity Stress Tests

We maintain our liquidity portfolio and monitor our sufficiency of liquidity based on an internal model
which simulates changes in cash outflow under specified stress scenarios to comply with our above mentioned
liquidity management policy.
We assess the liquidity requirements of the Nomura Group under various stress scenarios with differinglevels of severity over multiple time horizons. We evaluate these requirements under Nomura-specific and broad
market wide events, including potential credit rating downgrades at our parent company and subsidiary levels
that may impact us by loss of access to unsecured capital markets, additional collateral posting requirements,
limited or no access to secured funding markets and other events. We call this risk analysis our “Maximum
Cumulative Outflow (“MCO”)” framework.
The MCO framework is designed to incorporate the primary liquidity risks for Nomura and models therelevant cash flows in the following two primary scenarios:•

Stressed scenario—To maintain adequate liquidity during a severe market-wide liquidity event without
raising additional funds through unsecured financing or the liquidation of assets for a year; and•Acute stress scenario—To maintain adequate liquidity during a severe market-wide liquidity event
coupled with credit concerns regarding Nomura’s liquidity position, without raising additional funds
through unsecured funding or the liquidation of assets for one month.

We assume that Nomura will not be able to liquidate assets or adjust its business model during the time
horizons used in each of these scenarios. The MCO framework therefore defines the amount of liquidity required
to be held in order to meet our expected liquidity needs in a stress event to a level we believe appropriate basedon our liquidity risk appetite.
As of March 31, 2013, our liquidity portfolio exceeded net cash outflows under the stress scenarios
described above.
To ensure a readily available source for a potential liquidity requirement, we maintain a liquidity portfolio
in the form of cash and highly liquid, unencumbered securities that may be sold or pledged to provide liquidity.
As of March 31, 2013, our liquidity portfolio was ¥5,883.5 billion which generated a liquidity surplus taking into
account a stress scenario as defined in our liquidity risk policy. We recognize that the liquidity standards forfinancial institutions continue to be the subject of further discussion among the relevant supervisory bodies
including the Basel Committee. The existing model and simulations upon which we currently rely may need tobe reviewed depending on any new development in this area.

57

The following table presents a breakdown of our liquidity portfolio by type of financial assets as ofMarch 31, 2012 and 2013 and yearly averages maintained during the fiscal year. Yearly averages are calculatedusing month-end amounts.
Average forfiscal year ended
March 31, 2012

Billions of yen
As of
Average forMarch 31, fiscal year ended
2012
March 31, 2013

As ofMarch 31,2013

Cash, cash equivalent and time deposits(1) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Government securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Others(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,156.3
4,433.1
477.4¥1,137.3
3,877.4
413.0¥ 911.1
4,712.3
480.3¥ 960.6
4,512.3
410.6

Total liquidity portfolio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥6,066.8¥5,427.7¥6,103.7¥5,883.5(1) Cash, cash equivalents, and time deposits include nostro balance and deposits with both central banks andmarket counterparties that are readily available to support the liquidity position of Nomura.
(2) Others include other liquid financial assets such as money market funds and U.S. agency securities.
The following table presents a breakdown of our liquidity portfolio by currency as of March 31, 2012 and 2013and yearly averages maintained during the fiscal year. Yearly averages are calculated using month-end amounts.
Average forfiscal year ended
March 31, 2012

Billions of yen
As of
Average forMarch 31, fiscal year ended
2012
March 31, 2013

As ofMarch 31,2013

Japanese Yen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
US Dollar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Euro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
British Pound . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Others(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,970.5
1,714.6
1,691.1
491.5
199.1

¥1,531.1
2,273.3
813.4
487.2
322.7

¥1,836.6
2,445.6
816.1
695.9
309.5

¥1,362.2
2,355.1
876.5
752.6
537.1

Total liquidity portfolio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥6,066.8¥5,427.7¥6,103.7¥5,883.5(1) Others include other currencies such as the Canadian dollar, the Australian dollar, and the Swiss franc.
We assess our liquidity portfolio requirements globally as well as by each major operating entity in the
Nomura group. We primarily maintain our liquidity portfolio at Nomura Holdings, Inc. (“NHI”), Nomura
Securities Co. Ltd (“NSC”), our other major broker-dealer subsidiaries and our bank subsidiaries. In determining
the amounts and entities which hold this portfolio, we consider legal, regulatory and tax restrictions which may
impact our ability to freely transfer liquidity across different entities in the Nomura Group. For more information
regarding regulatory restrictions, see Note 20 “Regulatory requirements” in our consolidated financial statements
included in this annual report.
The following table presents a breakdown of our liquidity portfolio by entity as of March 31, 2012 and2013:
Billions of yen
March 31
2012
2013

NHI and NSC(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥1,535.6 ¥1,616.9
Major broker-dealer subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,724.7
3,179.0
Bank subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
921.7
775.3
Other group entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
245.7
312.3
Total liquidity portfolio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
58¥5,427.7¥5,883.5

(1) NSC, a broker dealer located in Japan, holds an account with the BOJ and has a direct access to the BOJ
Lombard facility through which same day funding is available for our securities pool. Liquidity surplus at
NHI is lent to NSC via short-term intercompany loans, which can be unwound immediately when needed.
In addition to the liquidity portfolio, we have ¥1,168.4 billion of other unencumbered assets comprising
mainly unpledged trading assets that can be used as an additional source of secured funding. The aggregate valueof our liquidity portfolios and other unencumbered assets as of March 31, 2013 was ¥7,051.9 billion which
represented 307.5% of our total unsecured debt maturing within one year.
Billions of yen
March 312012
2013

Net liquidity value of other unencumbered assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liquidity portfolio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,289.6
5,427.7¥1,168.4
5,883.5

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥6,717.3¥7,051.9

In the stress test, we assume the cash outflow as shown below and also assume that in certain instances,
legal and regulatory requirements can restrict the flow of funds between entities in our consolidated group, andfunds or securities may not freely move among us.
The size and structure of our liquidity portfolio takes into account immediate cash requirements arising from(i)

Upcoming maturities of unsecured debt (maturities less than one year)(ii) Potential buybacks of our outstanding debt(iii) Loss of secured funding lines particularly for less liquid assets, over and above our cash capital
estimates(iv) Fluctuation of funding needs under normal business circumstances(v) Cash and collateral outflows in a stress event
We constantly evaluate and modify our liquidity risk assumptions based on regulatory and market changes.
The model we use in order to simulate the impact of stress scenarios assumes no liquidation of assets, no ability
to issue additional unsecured funding, a widening of haircuts on outstanding repo funding, collateralization ofclearing banks and depositories, drawdowns on loan commitments and loss of liquidity from market losses oninventory.
In 2008, the Basel Committee published Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision(“Sound Principles”). To complement these principles, the Committee has further strengthened its liquidity
framework by developing two minimum standards for funding liquidity. These standards have been developed toachieve two separate but complementary objectives.
The first objective is to promote short-term resilience of a bank’s liquidity risk profile by ensuring that it has
sufficient high-quality liquid assets to survive a significant stress scenario lasting for one month. The Committee
developed the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (“LCR”) to achieve this objective.
The second objective is to promote resilience over a longer time horizon by creating additional incentives
for banks to fund their activities with more stable sources of funding on an ongoing basis. The Net Stable
Funding Ratio (“NSFR”) has a time horizon of one year and has been developed to provide a sustainablematurity structure of assets and liabilities.
59

These two standards are comprised mainly of specific parameters which are internationally “harmonised”
with prescribed values. Certain parameters, however, contain elements of national discretion to reflectjurisdiction-specific conditions.
After an observation period, the LCR, including any revisions, will be introduced on January 1, 2015. The
NSFR, including any revisions, will move to a minimum standard by January 1, 2018.
5.

Contingency Funding Plan

We have developed a detailed contingency funding plan to integrate liquidity risk control into ourcomprehensive risk management strategy and to enhance the quantitative aspects of our liquidity risk control
procedures. As a part of our Contingency Funding Plan (“CFP”), we have developed an approach for analyzing
and quantifying the impact of any liquidity crisis. This allows us to estimate the likely impact of both Nomuraspecific and market-wide events; and specifies the immediate action to be taken to mitigate any risk. The CFP
lists details of key internal and external parties to be contacted and the processes by which information is to bedisseminated. This has been developed at a legal entity level in order to capture specific cash requirements at the
local level—it assumes that our parent company does not have access to cash that may be trapped at a subsidiarylevel due to regulatory, legal or tax constraints. We periodically test the effectiveness of our funding plans fordifferent Nomura-specific and market-wide events. We also have access to central banks including but not
exclusively the Bank of Japan, which provide financing against various types of securities. These operations areaccessed in the normal course of business and are an important tool in mitigating contingent risk from market
disruptions.
Cash Flows
Nomura’s cash flows are primarily generated from operating activities undertaken in connection with ourclient flows and trading and from financing activities which are closely related to such activities. As a financial
institution, growth in operations tends to result in cash outflows from operating activities as well as investing
activities, as was generally the case for a number of years through the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. For the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, we recorded net cash inflows from operating activities and investing activities,
and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, we recorded net cash inflows from operating activities and net cash
outflows from investing activities as discussed in the comparative analysis below.

60

The following is the summary information on our consolidated cash flows for the years ended March 31,
2012 and 2013:
Billions of yen
Year Ended March 31
2012
2013

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading assets and private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities purchased under agreements to resell, net of securities sold underagreements to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities borrowed, net of securities loaned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥290.9 ¥ 549.5
26.1
105.7
971.3
(1,448.5)(1,058.4)
248.0
980.2
(508.8)(119.4)9.9(844.3)(867.6)23.3(6.3)

1,375.9863.5(595.2)(160.5)(701.6)(400.2)(301.5)47.2

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(549.8)
1,620.3(265.4)
1,070.5

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 1,070.5

¥

805.1

See the consolidated statements of cash flows in our consolidated financial statements for more detailed
information.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, our cash and cash equivalents decreased by ¥265.4 billion to¥805.1 billion. Net cash of ¥701.6 billion was used in financing activities due to cash outflows of ¥400.2 billion
by net payments of Long-term borrowings. As part of trading activities, while there were net cash outflows of¥1,200.5 billion from cash inflows due to an increase in Trading liabilities in combination with cash outflows
due to an increase in Trading assets and Private equity investments, they were offset by ¥2,239.4 billion of net
cash inflows from repo transactions and securities borrowed and loaned transactions such as Securities purchased
under agreements to resell, Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and Securities borrowed, net of
Securities loaned. As a result, net cash of ¥549.5 billion was provided by operating activities.
For the year ended March 31, 2012, our cash and cash equivalents decreased by ¥549.8 billion to¥1,070.5 billion. Net cash of ¥844.3 billion was used in financing activities due to cash outflows of ¥867.6 billion
by net payments of Long-term borrowings. As part of trading activities, while there were net cash outflows of¥87.1 billion from cash inflows due to a decrease in Trading assets and Private equity investments incombination with cash outflows due to a decrease in Trading liabilities, they were offset by ¥471.4 billion of net
cash inflows from repo transactions and securities borrowed and loaned transactions such as Securities purchased
under agreements to resell, Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and Securities borrowed, net of
Securities loaned. As a result, net cash of ¥290.9 billion was provided by operating activities.
Balance Sheet and Financial Leverage
Total assets as of March 31, 2013, were ¥37,942.4 billion, a increase of ¥2,245.1 billion compared with
¥35,697.3 billion as of March 31, 2012, reflecting increases in Securities purchased under agreements to resell
and Trading assets. Total liabilities as of March 31, 2013, were ¥35,623.5 billion, a increase of ¥2,315.3 billion
compared with ¥33,308.2 billion as of March 31, 2012, reflecting increases in Securities sold under agreements61to repurchase and Trading liabilities. NHI shareholders’ equity as of March 31, 2013, was ¥2,294.4 billion, an
increase of ¥187.2 billion compared with ¥2,107.2 billion as of March 31, 2012, due to increases in Retained
earnings and Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
We seek to maintain sufficient capital at all times to withstand losses due to extreme market movements.
The EMB is responsible for implementing and enforcing capital policies. This includes the determination of ourbalance sheet size and required capital levels. We continuously review our equity capital base to ensure that it
can support the economic risk inherent in our business. There are also regulatory requirements for minimum
capital of entities that operate in regulated securities or banking businesses.
As leverage ratios are commonly used by other financial institutions similar to us, we voluntarily provide a
Leverage ratio and Adjusted leverage ratio primarily for benchmarking purposes so that users of our annual
report can compare our leverage against other financial institutions. Adjusted leverage ratio is a non-GAAP
financial measure that Nomura considers to be a useful supplemental measure of leverage. There are currently no
regulatory or statutory reporting requirements which require us to disclose leverage ratios.
The following table sets forth NHI shareholders’ equity, total assets, adjusted assets and leverage ratios:
Billions of yen, except ratios
March 31
2012
2013

NHI shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjusted assets(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leverage ratio(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjusted leverage ratio(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 2,107.2
35,697.3
21,954.7
16.9x
10.4x

¥ 2,294.4
37,942.4
23,827.1
16.5x
10.4x

(1) Reconciles to the total assets amount disclosed on the face of our consolidated balance sheets and therefore
excludes the fair value of securities transferred to counterparties under repo-to-maturity and certain
Japanese securities lending transactions which are accounted for as sales rather than collateralized financing
arrangements. The fair value of securities derecognized under these agreements has not had a significant
impact on our reported Leverage and Adjusted leverage ratios as of March 2012. The fair value of securities
derecognized under these agreements as of March 2013 was ¥nil.
(2) Represents total assets less Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities borrowed.
Adjusted assets is a non-GAAP financial measure and is calculated as follows:
Billions of yen
March 3120122013

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥35,697.3
Less:
Securities purchased under agreements to resell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,662.7
Securities borrowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,079.9¥37,942.4

Adjusted assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥23,827.1¥21,954.7

8,295.4
5,819.9(3) Equals total assets divided by NHI shareholders’ equity.
(4) Equals adjusted assets divided by NHI shareholders’ equity.
Total assets increased by 6.3% reflecting primarily an increase in Trading assets. Total NHI shareholders’equity increased by 8.9%. As a result, our leverage ratio fell from 16.9 times as of March 31, 2012 to 16.5 times
as of March 31, 2013.

62

Adjusted assets increased primarily due to an increase in Trading assets. As a result, our adjusted leverage
ratio was 10.4 times as of March 31, 2012 and as of March 31, 2013.
Capital Management
Capital Management Policy
We seek to enhance shareholder value and to capture growing business opportunities by maintaining
sufficient levels of capital. We review levels of capital as appropriate, taking into consideration the economic
risks inherent to operating our businesses, regulatory requirements, and maintaining our credit ratings necessary
to operate businesses globally.
Dividends
Nomura believes that pursuing a sustainable increase in shareholder value and paying dividends are
essential to generating returns to our shareholders. Nomura will strive to pay stable dividends using a
consolidated payout ratio of 30 percent as a key indicator.
Dividend payments are determined by taking into account a comprehensive range of factors such as thetightening of Basel regulations and other changes to the regulatory environment, as well as the Company’s
consolidated financial performance.
Nomura paid a dividend of ¥2.0 per share for the first half and a dividend of ¥6.0 per share for the second
half in line with its dividend policy for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.
With respect to retained earnings, in order to implement measures to adapt to regulatory changes and toincrease shareholder value, we seek to efficiently invest in business areas where high profitability and growth
may reasonably be expected, including the development and expansion of infrastructure.
The following table sets forth the amounts of dividends per share paid by us in respect of the periods
indicated:
Fiscal year ended or ending March 31,

2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

First Quarter

Second Quarter

Third Quarter

Fourth Quarter

Total

¥8.50
8.50
—
—
—
—

¥8.50
8.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
2.00

¥8.50
8.50
—
—
—
—

¥8.50
—
4.00
4.00
2.00
6.00

¥34.00
25.50
8.00
8.00
6.00
8.00

Stock Repurchases
We consider repurchase of treasury stock as an option in our financial strategy to respond quickly tochanges in the business environment and to increase shareholder value. We make announcements immediately
after any decision to set up a share buyback program and conduct such programs in accordance with internal
guidelines.
Preferred Stock
Effective June 28, 2011, in order to respond to Basel III capital adequacy requirements, we have amended
our Articles of Incorporation to enable the issuance of each class of preferred stock with a provision forredemption upon the occurrence of certain events. (See “Preferred Stock” under Item 10.B. of this annual reportfor further information.) We have no plans to issue preferred stock as of June 27, 2013. The amendment did not
result in any change to the total number of shares authorized to be issued.
63

Consolidated Regulatory Capital Requirements
As discussed in Item 4.B. of this annual report, the FSA established the “Guideline for Financial
Conglomerates Supervision” (“Financial Conglomerates Guideline”) in June 2005 and set out the rules on
consolidated regulatory capital. We started monitoring our consolidated capital adequacy ratio in accordancewith the Financial Conglomerates Guideline from April 2005.
From the end of March 2009, we elected to calculate the consolidated capital adequacy ratio according to
the Bank Holding Companies Notice as permitted under the Financial Instruments Business Operators
Guidelines, although we continue to be monitored as a financial conglomerate governed by the Financial
Conglomerates Guideline.
The Company has been assigned as a Final Designated Parent Company who must calculate a consolidated
capital adequacy ratio according to the Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company in April
2011. Since then, we have been calculating our consolidated capital adequacy ratio according to the Capital
Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company. Note that the Capital Adequacy Notice on Final
Designated Parent Company has been revised to be in line with Basel 2.5 Basel III, and, we have calculated
Basel III-based consolidated capital adequacy ratio from the end of March 2013, Basel 2.5 includes significant
change in calculation method of market risk and Basel III includes redefinition of capital items for the purpose of
requiring higher quality of capital and expansion of the scope of credit risk-weighted assets calculation.
In accordance with Article 2 of the Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company, ourconsolidated capital adequacy ratio is currently calculated based on the amounts of common equity Tier 1 capital,
Tier 1 capital (sum of common equity Tier 1 capital and additional Tier 1 capital), total capital (sum of Tier 1
capital and Tier 2 capital), credit risk-weighted assets, market risk and operational risk. As of March 31 2013, ourcommon equity Tier 1 capital ratio (common equity Tier 1 capital divided by risk-weighted assets) is 11.9%, Tier
1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital divided by risk-weighted assets) is 11.9% and consolidated capital adequacy ratio(total capital divided by risk-weighted assets) is 13.9% and we were in compliance with the requirement for eachratio set out in the Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company (required level as of March 31,
2013 is 3.5% for common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, 4.5% for Tier 1 capital ratio and 8% for consolidated capital
adequacy ratio).
The following table presents the Company’s consolidated capital adequacy ratios as of March 31, 2012 andMarch 31, 2013. Comparative amounts as of March 31, 2012 are calculated based on the Capital Adequacy
Notice on Final Designated Parent Company in effect as of that date (and therefore prior to the Basel III
amendment).
Billions of yen, except ratios
March 312012
2013

Common equity Tier 1 capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier 1 capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-Weighted Assets
Credit risk-weighted assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Market risk equivalent assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operational risk equivalent assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥Total risk-weighted assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Capital Adequacy Ratios
Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier 1 capital ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated capital adequacy ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64—
2,090.2
2,427.0¥ 2,092.9
2,092.9
2,452.1

8,324.4
3,924.6
2,432.0

9,529.1
5,846.1
2,171.4¥14,681.0¥17,546.7

—
14.2%
16.5%

11.9%
11.9%
13.9%

Common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital are calculated by deducting eachregulatory adjustment from each capital item, respectively. Each capital item and regulatory adjustment isdefined in the Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company and these new definitions ofcapital will come into effect gradually by transitional measures.
As of March 31, 2013, capital items for our common equity Tier 1 capital mainly consists of shareholder’sequity relating to the common stock and all or part of subordinated debt which satisfies the requirements under
Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company (such as maturity) is included into capital items
for Tier 2 capital. We have not issued any capital instruments which can be included into additional Tier 1
capital.
Regulatory adjustment for our common equity Tier 1 capital mainly consists of a part of intangible assets
and 50% of expected losses and regulatory adjustment for our Tier 2 capital includes investments in additional
Tier 1 capital instruments of other financial institutions and 50% of expected losses. Regulatory adjustment for
our additional Tier 1 capital will be included into regulatory adjustment for common equity Tier 1 capital, as we
don’t have any outstanding additional Tier 1 capital instruments.
Market risk equivalent assets are calculated by using The Internal Models Approach for market risk. Fromthe end of December, 2011, we are required to calculate market risk equivalent assets under the Basel 2.5 rule,
which is significantly larger than under the Basel II rule. Also, from the end of March 2013, a part of
securitization products is added to the scope of market risk calculation.
On the end of March, 2011, we started calculating credit risk-weighted assets and operational risk equivalent
assets by using the foundation Internal Ratings-Based Approach and The Standardized Approach, respectively,
with the approval of the FSA. Furthermore, from the end of December, 2012, upon approval from the FSA, westarted using the Internal Model Method for credit risk exposure calculation of majority of derivative andrepurchase transactions instead of the Current Exposure Method or the Comprehensive Method. Since the end of
March 2013, the scope of credit risk-weighted assets calculation has been widened following the implementationof Basel III.
We provide consolidated capital adequacy ratios not only to demonstrate that we are in compliance with therequirements set out in the Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company but also forbenchmarking purposes so that users of our report can compare our capital position against those of otherfinancial groups to which Basel III is applied. Management receives and reviews these capital ratios on a regularbasis.
The Basel Committee has issued a series of announcements regarding a broader program designed tostrengthen the regulatory capital framework in light of weaknesses revealed by the financial crises. The following
is a summary of the proposals which are most relevant to us.
On July 13, 2009, the Basel Committee announced its approval of a package of measures designed tostrengthen its rules governing trading book capital and to enhance the three pillars of the Basel II framework,
which was called ‘Basel 2.5’. This announcement stated that the Basel Committee’s trading book rules, effectiveat the end of 2011, would introduce higher capital requirements to capture the credit risk of complex trading
activities, which became effective as the end of 2011. Such trading book rules also included a stressed VaRrequirement.
On December 16, 2010, in an effort to promote a more resilient banking sector, the Basel Committee issued
Basel III, that is, “International framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitoring” and“A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems”. The proposals include raising thequality, consistency and transparency of the capital base; strengthening the risk coverage of the capitalframework such as the implementation of a credit value adjustment (“CVA”) charge for over-the-counter
derivative trades; introducing a leverage ratio requirement as a supplemental measure to the risk-based
framework; and introducing a series of measures to address concerns over the “procyclicality” of the current
65

framework. The proposals also introduce a minimum liquidity standard including a 30-day liquidity coverage
ratio as well as a longer-term structural liquidity ratio. Additional capital, liquidity or other supervisory measures
to reduce the externalities created by systemically important institutions are also under review. These standards
will be phased in gradually from 2013. In addition, after two rounds of public consultation and discussions with
the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (“CPSS”) and the International Organization of Securities
Commissions (“IOSCO”), the Basel Committee has issued interim rules for the capitalization of bank exposures
to central counterparties (“CCPs”) on July 25, 2012, which are intended to come into effect as of January 2013 aspart of Basel III.
At the G-20 summit in November 2011, the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) and the Basel Committeeannounced the list of global systemically important banks (“G-SIBs”) and the additional requirements to the
G-SIBs including the recovery and resolution plan. The FSB also announced the group of G-SIBs will be updated
annually and published by the FSB each November. In November 2012, the FSB and the Basel Committee haveupdated the list of G-SIBs. We were not designated as a G-SIBs in November 2011 and November 2012. On theother hand, the FSB and the Basel Committee were asked to work on extending the framework for G-SIBs todomestic systemically important financial institutions (“D-SIBs”) and the Basel Committee developed andpublished a set of principles on the assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement for
D-SIBs.
The FSA introduced rules and notices such as the Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent
Company on consolidated regulation and supervision of securities companies on a consolidated basis on April 1,
2011 to improve the stability and transparency of Japan’s financial system and ensure the protection of investors.
It reviewed the Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company according to Basel 2.5 andBasel III framework and the revised notice in line with Basel 2.5 was implemented at the end of December 2011
and the revised notice in line with Basel III was implemented at the end of March 2013. Following theimplementation of the revised notice in line with Basel III, inclusion of risk of fluctuations in CVA andexposures to CCPs into credit risk-weighted assets calculation became effective. It is expected that such
regulation and notice will be revised further to be in line with a series of rules and standards proposed by theBasel Committee.
Credit Ratings
The cost and availability of unsecured funding are generally dependent on credit ratings. Our long-term andshort-term debt is rated by several recognized credit rating agencies. We believe that our credit ratings include
the credit ratings agencies’ assessment of the general operating environment, our positions in the markets inwhich we operate, reputation, earnings structure, trend and volatility of our earnings, risk management
framework, liquidity and capital management. An adverse change in any of these factors could result in adowngrade of our credit ratings, and that could, in turn, increase our borrowing costs and limit our access to thecapital markets or require us to post additional collateral and permit counterparties to terminate transactions
pursuant to certain contractual obligations. In addition, our credit ratings can have a significant impact on certainof our trading revenues, particularly in those businesses where longer term counterparty performance is critical,
such as OTC derivative transactions.

66

As of May 31, 2013, the credit ratings of the Company and NSC were as follows:
Nomura Holdings, Inc.

Short-term Debt

Long-term Debt

A-2
—
a-1
—

BBB+
Baa3
A+
AA-

Short-term Debt

Long-term Debt

A-2
P-2
a-1
—

ABaa2
A+
AA-

Standard & Poor’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Moody’s Investors Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rating and Investment Information, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Standard & Poor’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Moody’s Investors Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rating and Investment Information, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Both Rating and Investment Information, Inc. and Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. are credit rating
agencies nationally recognized in Japan. We rely on, or utilize, credit ratings on our long-term and short-term
debt provided by these Japanese credit rating agencies, as well as Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s InvestorsService, for unsecured funding and other financing purposes and also for our trading and other businessactivities. Within the rating classification system of Rating and Investment Information, Inc., “a-1” is the highestof five categories for short-term debt and indicates “a strong degree of certainty regarding debt repayment”; and“A” is the third highest of nine categories for long-term debt and indicates “a high degree of certainty regarding
debt repayment with excellence in specific component factors”, with a plus (+) or minus (-) sign added to a ratingin that category to indicate its relative standing within that category. Within the rating classification system ofJapan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd., “AA” is the second highest of ten categories for long-term debt and indicates“a very high level of capacity to honor the financial commitment on the obligation”, with a plus (+) or minus (-)
sign added to a rating in that category to indicate its relative standing within that category.
There has been no change to the ratings in the above table since the date indicated.
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
Not applicable.
D. Trend Information.
The information required by this item is set forth in Item 5.A of this annual report.
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
Off-balance sheet entities
In the normal course of business, we engage in a variety of off-balance sheet arrangements with off-balance
sheet entities which may have an impact on Nomura’s future financial position and performance.
Off-balance sheet arrangements with off-balance sheet entities include the following where Nomura has:•

an obligation under a guarantee contract;•a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an off-balance sheet entity or similararrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support;•

any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a
derivative instrument; or67•any obligation, including a contingent obligation, arising out of a variable interest in an off-balance
sheet entity that is held by, and material to, us, where such entity provides financing, liquidity, market
risk or credit risk support to, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with,us.

Off-balance sheet entities may take the form of a corporation, partnership, fund, trust or other legal vehicle
which is designed to fulfill a limited, specific purpose by its sponsor. We both create or sponsor these entities andalso enter into arrangements with entities created or sponsored by others.
Our involvement with these entities includes structuring, underwriting, distributing and selling debt
instruments and beneficial interests issued by these entities, subject to prevailing market conditions. In thenormal course of business, we also act as a transferor of financial assets to these entities, as well as, andunderwriter, distributor and seller of asset-repackaged financial instruments issued by these entities, inconnection with our securitization and equity derivative activities. We retain, purchase and sell variable interests
in SPEs in connection with our market-making, investing and structuring activities. Our other types ofoff-balance sheet arrangements include guarantee agreements and derivative contracts. Significant involvement isassessed based on all of our arrangements with these entities, even if the probability of loss, as assessed at thebalance sheet date, is remote.
For further information about transactions with VIEs, see Note 8 “Securitizations and Variable Interest
Entities” in our consolidated financial statements within this annual report.
Repurchase and securities lending transactions accounted for as sales
We enter into certain types of repurchase transactions and securities lending transactions which we accountfor as sales rather than collateralized financings where the criteria for derecognition of the securities transferredunder ASC 860 are met. These consist of repo-to-maturity transactions and certain types of securities
transactions.
We enter into repo-to-maturity transactions to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities between the cash
security and repo markets. These transactions involve the sourcing of specific securities in the market andcontemporaneously entering into repurchase agreements with different counterparties where the maturity of theagreement matches the maturity of the security transferred as collateral. We account for these transactions as
sales rather than collateralized financings where the criteria for derecognition of the securities transferred under
ASC 860 are met. The amounts of securities derecognized from our consolidated balance sheets under open repoto-maturity transactions as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 were ¥39,797 million and ¥nil, respectively.
We engage in certain Japanese securities lending transactions for funding purposes under which we transfer
long securities (such as Japanese listed equities). The agreements supporting these transactions include varying
margining requirements, but the amount of cash we borrow from our counterparties is typically significantly lessthan the fair value of securities we lend. We account for these transactions as sales in our consolidated financial
statements where the criteria for derecognition of the transferred financial assets under ASC 860 are met. In
particular, we do not maintain effective control over the transferred financial assets as we are not able to be
repurchase or redeem the transferred financial assets on substantially agreed terms, even in the event of default
by the transferee. Upon adoption of Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-03 “Reconsideration of
Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements” as of January 1, 2012, Nomura has not derecognized suchtransactions that started on and after the adoption date. The amounts of securities derecognized from ourconsolidated balance sheets under open securities lending transactions as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 were
¥1,930 million and ¥nil, respectively.

68

F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations.
As part of our business, we enter into a variety of contractual obligations and contingent commitments,
which may require future payments. These arrangements include:
Standby letters of credit and other guarantees:•

In the normal course of our banking / financing activities, we enter into various guarantee arrangementswith counterparties in the form of standby letters of credit and other guarantees, which generally have
fixed expiration dates.

Long-term borrowings and contractual interest payments:•

In connection with our operating activities, we issue Japanese yen and non-Japanese yen denominatedlong-term borrowings which incur variable and fixed interest payments in accordance with our funding
policy.

Operating lease commitments:•

We lease our office space, certain employees’ residential facilities and other facilities in Japan andoverseas primarily under cancellable lease agreements which are customarily renewed upon expiration;•

We lease certain equipment and facilities in Japan and overseas under non-cancellable operating leaseagreements.

Capital lease commitments:•

We lease certain equipment and facilities in Japan and overseas under capital lease agreements.

Purchase obligations:•

We have purchase obligations for goods and services which include payments for construction,
advertising, and computer and telecommunications maintenance agreements.

Commitments to extend credit:•

In connection with our banking and financing activities, we enter into contractual commitments toextend credit, which generally have fixed expiration dates;•

In connection with our investment banking activities, we enter into agreements with clients under which
we commit to underwrite securities that may be issued by clients.

Commitments to invest in partnerships:•

In connection with our merchant banking activities, we have commitments to invest in interests invarious partnerships and other entities and commitments to provide financing for investments related tothose partnerships.

Commitments to purchase aircraft:•

In connection with our aircraft leasing business, we have commitments to purchase aircraft.

Note 10 “Lease” in our consolidated financial statements contains further detail on our operating lease andcapital lease. Note 13 “Borrowings” in our consolidated financial statements contains further detail on our shortterm and long-term borrowing obligations and Note 22 “Commitments, contingencies and guarantees” in ourconsolidated financial statements included in this annual report contains further detail on our other commitments,
contingencies and guarantees.
69

The contractual amounts of commitments to extend credit represent the maximum amounts at risk should
the contracts be fully drawn upon, should the counterparties default, and assuming the value of any existing
collateral becomes worthless. The total contractual amount of these commitments may not represent future cash
requirements since the commitments may expire without being drawn upon. The credit risk associated with thesecommitments varies depending on the clients’ creditworthiness and the value of collateral held. We evaluate eachclient’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us
upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.
The following table presents information regarding amounts and timing of our future contractual obligations
and contingent commitments as of March 31, 2013:

Total
contractual
amountLess than
1 yearMillions of yen
Years to maturity
1 to 33 to 5years
years

More than
5 years

Standby letters of credit and other guarantees . . . . . . ¥9,084 ¥
8 ¥
319 ¥
668 ¥
8,089
Long-term borrowings(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,414,978 701,517 2,460,980 1,499,218 2,753,263
Contractual interest payments(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,170,022 158,257
216,650
151,005
644,110
Operating lease commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
154,254
17,80130,896
21,785
83,772
Capital lease commitments(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
54,036
497
3,397
6,965
43,177Purchase obligations(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26,22824,5691,659——
Commitments to extend credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
369,988
55,45974,810126,139
113,580
Commitments to invest in partnerships . . . . . . . . . . .
29,974375
17,702
1,503
10,394
Commitments to purchase aircraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30,143
21,141
9,002——
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥9,258,707 ¥979,624 ¥2,815,415 ¥1,807,283 ¥3,656,385(1) The amounts disclosed within long-term borrowings exclude financial liabilities recognized within longterm borrowings as a result of transfers of financial assets that are accounted for as financings rather thansales in accordance with ASC 860. These are not borrowings issued for our own funding purposes andtherefore do not represent actual contractual obligations by us to deliver cash.
(2) The amounts represent estimated future interest payments related to long-time borrowings based on the
period through to their maturity and applicable interest rates as of March 31, 2013.
(3) The total contractual amount of capital lease commitments is the total minimum lease payments before
deducting interest.
(4) The minimum contractual obligations under enforceable and legally binding contracts that specify all
significant terms. Amounts exclude obligations that are already reflected on our consolidated balance sheets
as liabilities or payables.
Excluded from the above table are obligations that are generally short-term in nature, including short-termborrowings, deposits received at banks and other payables, collateralized agreements and financing transactions(such as resale and repurchase agreements), and trading liabilities.
In addition to amounts presented above, we have commitments under resale and repurchase agreements
including amounts in connection with collateralized agreements, collateralized financing and Gensaki Repo
transactions. These commitments amount to ¥4,103 billion for resale agreements and ¥1,152 billion for
repurchase agreements as of March 31, 2013.

70

Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A. Directors and Senior Management.
Directors
The following table provides information about Directors of the Company as of June 27, 2013. With respect
to the information under “Brief Personal History” below, some of the Directors changed their titles upon our
adoption of the holding company structure on October 1, 2001 and the Committee System on June 26, 2003, as
described in Item 6.C of this annual report.
Name(Date of Birth)

Responsibilities and Status
in Nomura and Other Companies

Brief Personal History

Nobuyuki Koga
(Aug. 22, 1950)

Director
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Chairman of the Nomination Committee
Chairman of the Compensation
Committee
Director and Chairman of Nomura
Securities Co., Ltd.
Representative Director and President ofKanagawa Kaihatsu Kanko Co., Ltd.

Apr. 1974 Joined the Company
Jun. 1995 Director of the Company
Apr. 1999 Managing Director of theCompany
Jun. 2000 Director and Deputy Presidentof the Company
Oct. 2001 Director and Deputy Presidentof the Company
Director and Deputy Presidentof Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Apr. 2003 Director and President of theCompany
Director and President of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Jun. 2003 Director, President & CEO of
the Company
Director and Executive Officer
and President of Nomura
Securities Co., Ltd.
Apr. 2008 Director and Representative
Executive Officer of theCompany
Director and Chairman of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Jun. 2008 Director and Chairman of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Jun. 2011 Director and Chairman of theCompany (Current)
Director and Chairman of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
(Current)

Koji Nagai(Jan. 25, 1959)

Director, Representative Executive
Officer and Group CEO

Apr. 1981
Apr. 2003

Director and President of Nomura
Securities Co., Ltd.

71

Joined the Company
Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.
Jun. 2003 Senior Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Apr. 2007 Executive Managing Directorof Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Name
(Date of Birth)

Responsibilities and Status
in Nomura and Other Companies

Brief Personal History

Oct. 2008

Senior Corporate Managing
Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.
Apr. 2009 Executive Managing Directorand Executive Vice Presidentof Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Apr. 2011 Co-COO and Deputy Presidentof Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Apr. 2012 Senior Managing Director of
the Company
Director and President of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Aug. 2012 Representative Executive
Officer & Group CEO of theCompany
Director and President of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Jun. 2013 Director, Representative
Executive Officer & GroupCEO of the Company (Current)
Director and President of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
(Current)
Atsushi Yoshikawa(Apr. 7, 1954)

Director, Representative Executive
Officer and Group COO
Wholesale CEO

Apr. 1978
Jun. 2000
Oct. 2001
Jun. 2003
Apr. 2004

Apr. 2005

Apr. 2006

Apr. 2008

Oct. 2008

72

Joined the Company
Director of the Company
Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.
Senior Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Senior Managing Director of
the Company
Executive Managing Directorof Nomura Asset Management
Co., Ltd.
Senior Managing Director of
the Company
Executive Vice President of
Nomura Asset Management
Co., Ltd.
Executive Vice President of
Nomura Asset Management
Co., Ltd.
Director and President of
Nomura Asset Management
Co., Ltd.
Executive Managing Directorof the Company
Director, President & CEO of
Nomura Asset Management
Co., Ltd.

Name(Date of Birth)

Responsibilities and Status
in Nomura and Other Companies

Brief Personal History

Jun. 2011

Executive Vice President of theCompany
CEO and President of Nomura
Holding America Inc.
Oct. 2011 Executive Vice President of theCompany
CEO and President of Nomura
Holding America Inc.
Chairman and CEO of Nomura
Securities International, Inc.
Aug. 2012 Representative Executive
Officer & Group COO of theCompany
Jun. 2013 Director, Representative
Executive Officer & GroupCOO of the Company(Current)
Hiroyuki Suzuki(Feb. 3, 1959)

Director
Member of the Audit Committee
Outside Director of The Nomura Trustand Banking Co., Ltd.
Outside Director of Nomura AssetManagement Co., Ltd.

Apr. 1982
Apr. 2005
Oct. 2008
Dec. 2008
Apr. 2009

Jun. 2010

Apr. 2011

Apr. 2013
Jun. 2013
David Benson(Feb. 9, 1951)

Director

Feb. 1997

Director of Nomura Europe Holdings, plc
Director of Nomura International plc

73

Joined the Company
Senior Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Senior Managing Director of
the Company
Senior Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Senior Corporate Managing
Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.
Senior Corporate Managing
Director of the Company
Executive Managing Director
and Senior Corporate
Managing Director of Nomura
Securities Co., Ltd.
Senior Corporate Managing
Director of the Company
Executive Vice President of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Advisor of the Company
Director of the Company(Current)

Joined Nomura International
plc
Jul. 1999
Head of Risk Management,
Nomura International plc
Mar. 2005 COO of Nomura International
plc
Aug. 2007 Resigned from Nomura
International plc

Name(Date of Birth)

Responsibilities and Status
in Nomura and Other Companies

Brief Personal History

Nov. 2008

Jan. 2011

Apr. 2011

Jun. 2011
Masahiro Sakane(Jan 7, 1941)

Outside Director
Member of the Nomination Committee
Member of the Compensation Committee
Councilor and Senior Adviser of Komatsu
Ltd.
Outside Director of Tokyo Electron
LimitedOutside Director of ASAHI GLASS Co.,Ltd.
Outside Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.

Apr. 1963
Jun. 2001
Jun. 2003

Jun. 2007
Jun. 2008
Jun. 2010
Apr. 2013
Jun. 2013

Toshinori Kanemoto(Aug. 24, 1945)

Outside Director
Member of the Audit Committee
Of-Counsel of City-Yuwa Partners
Outside Statutory Auditor of Kameda
Seika Co., Ltd.
Outside Statutory Auditor of JX
Holdings, Inc.
Outside Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.

74

Apr. 1968
Apr. 1992

Chief Risk Officer, Senior
Managing Director of theCompany
Vice Chairman of theCompany (Senior Managing
Director) Risk and Regulatory
Affairs
Vice Chairman of theCompany (Senior Managing
Director)
Director of the Company(Current)
Joined Komatsu Ltd.
Representative Director andPresident of Komatsu Ltd.
Representative Director andPresident & CEO of Komatsu
Ltd.
Representative Director andChairman of Komatsu Ltd.
Outside Director of theCompany (Current)
Director and Chairman of
Komatsu Ltd.
Director and Councilor of
Komatsu Ltd.
Councilor and Senior Adviserof Komatsu Ltd. (Current)

Joined National Police Agency
Kumamoto Prefecture Police
Headquarters, Director-General
Aug. 1995 Director General of theInternational Affairs
Department, National Police
AgencyOct. 1996 President of ICPO-INTERPOL
Aug. 2000 President, National Police
AcademyApr. 2001 Director of Cabinet
Intelligence, Cabinet
Secretariat, Government ofJapan
Jan. 2007 Registered as Attorney-at-Law(Dai-ichi Tokyo Bar
Association)
Feb. 2007 Of-Counsel of City-Yuwa
Partners (Current)
Jun. 2011 Outside Director of theCompany (Current)Name(Date of Birth)

Responsibilities and Status
in Nomura and Other Companies

Tsuguoki Fujinuma(Nov. 21, 1944)

Outside Director
Chairman of the Audit Committee
Outside Statutory Auditor of Sumitomo
Corporation
Outside Statutory Auditor of Takeda
Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Outside Director of Sumitomo Life
Insurance Company
Outside Statutory Auditor of Seven &i Holdings Co., Ltd.
Outside Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.

Apr. 1969

Takao Kusakari(Mar. 13, 1940)

Outside Director
Member of the Nomination Committee
Member of the Compensation Committee
Corporate Advisor of NYK Line
Outside Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.

Apr. 1964

Brief Personal History

Joined Horie Morita
Accounting Firm
Jun. 1970 Joined Arthur & Young
Accounting Firm
Nov. 1974 Registered as a Certified Public
Accountant
May 1991 Managing Partner of Asahi
Shinwa Accounting Firm
Jun. 1993 Managing Partner of Ota
Showa & Co. (Ernst & Young
ShinNihon (currently, Ernst &Young ShinNihon LLC))
May 2000 President of the International
Federation of Accountants
Jul. 2004
Chairman and President of theJapanese Institute of Certified
Public Accountants
Jun. 2007 Retired from Ernst & Young
ShinNihon
Jul. 2007
Advisor of the JapaneseInstitute of Certified Public
Accountants (Current)
Jun. 2008 Outside Director of theCompany (Current)

Aug. 1999
Apr. 2002
Apr. 2004
Apr. 2006
Apr. 2009
Jun. 2010
Jun. 2011

Dame Clara Furse(Sep. 16, 1957)

Outside Director
Non-Executive Director of Amadeus IT
Holding, S.A.
Non-Executive Director of UK
Department for Work and Pensions
External Member of the Bank ofEngland’s Financial Policy Committee

Feb. 1983
Jun. 1990

Jun. 1997
May 1998
Jan. 2001

75

Joined Nippon Yusen
Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line)
President of NYK Line
President, Corporate Officer of
NYK Line
Chairman, Corporate Officer of
NYK Line
Chairman, Chairman Corporate
Officer of NYK Line
Director and Corporate
Advisor of NYK Line
Corporate Advisor of NYK
Line (Current)
Outside Director of theCompany (Current)
Joined Phillips & Drew/UBS
Non-Executive Director of
London International Financial
Futures Exchange (“LIFFE”)
Deputy Chairman of LIFFE
Group Chief Executive of
Credit Lyonnais Rouse
Chief Executive of London
Stock Exchange GroupName(Date of Birth)

Responsibilities and Status
in Nomura and Other Companies

Brief Personal History

Jun. 2010
Apr. 2013

Michael Lim Choo
San (Sep. 10, 1946)

Outside Director
Chairman of the Land Transport
Authority of Singapore
Director of Nomura Asia Holding N.V.
Non-Executive Chairman of Nomura
Singapore Ltd.

Outside Director of theCompany (Current)
External Member of the Bankof England’s Financial Policy
Committee (Current)

Aug. 1972

Joined Price Waterhouse,
SingaporeJan. 1992 Managing Partner of Price
Waterhouse, Singapore
Oct. 1998 Member of the Singapore
Public Service Commission(Current)
Jul. 1999
Executive Chairman ofPricewaterhouseCoopers,
Singapore
Sep. 2002 Chairman of the Land
Transport Authority ofSingapore (Current)
Nov. 2007 Member of the Legal Service
Commission, Singapore(Current)
Jun. 2011 Outside Director of theCompany (Current)
Oct. 2011 Chairman of the Singapore
Accountancy Commission(formerly the Pro-Tem
Singapore Accountancy
Council) (Current)
Nov. 2011 Chairman of the AccountingStandards Council, Singapore(Current)

Among the above listed Directors, Masahiro Sakane, Toshinori Kanemoto, Tsuguoki Fujinuma, Takao
Kusakari, Dame Clara Furse, and Michael Lim Choo San satisfy the requirements for an “outside director” under
the Companies Act. The Companies Act defines an outside director of a company as a non-executive director(i) who has never assumed the position of executive director, executive officer, manager or employee of thecompany or its subsidiaries and (ii) who does not currently assume the position of executive director, executive
officer, manager or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries.

76

Executive Officers
The following table provides information about the Company’s Executive Officers as of June 27, 2013.
With respect to the information under “Brief Personal History” below, some of the Executive Officers changed
their titles or positions upon our adoption of the holding company structure on October 1, 2001 and theCommittee System on June 26, 2003, as described in Item 6.C of this annual report.
Name(Date of Birth)

Responsibilities and Status
in Nomura and Other Companies

Brief Personal History

Koji Nagai(Jan. 25, 1959)

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

Atsushi Yoshikawa(Apr. 7, 1954)

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

Toshio Morita(Apr. 17, 1961)

Executive Managing Director
Retail CEO

Apr. 1985
Apr. 2008

Toshihiro Iwasaki(May 10, 1957)

Executive Managing Director
Asset Management CEO
Director and Chairman, President & CEO
of Nomura Asset Management Co., Ltd.

Apr. 1981
Apr. 2004

Joined the Company
Executive Managing Directorof Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Oct. 2008 Senior Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Apr. 2010 Senior Corporate Managing
Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.
Apr. 2011 Senior Corporate Managing
Director of the Company
Aug. 2012 Executive Managing Directorof the Company (Current)
Retail CEO (Current)
Executive Vice President of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
(Current)

77

Joined the Company
Senior Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Apr. 2008 President & CEO of The
Nomura Trust and Banking
Co., Ltd.
Apr. 2011 Deputy President of Nomura
Asset Management Co., Ltd.
Jun. 2011 Executive Managing Directorof the Company
Asset Management CEO
Director and Chairman & CEO
of Nomura Asset Management
Co., Ltd.
Aug. 2012 Executive Managing Directorof the Company (Current)
Asset Management CEO(Current)
Director and Chairman,
President & CEO of Nomura
Asset Management Co., Ltd.
(Current)

Name(Date of Birth)

Shoichi Nagamatsu(Jul. 6, 1958)

Shigesuke Kashiwagi(Nov. 13, 1959)

Responsibilities and Status
in Nomura and Other Companies

Executive Managing Director
Chief of Staff
Executive Managing Director andExecutive Vice President of Nomura
Securities Co., Ltd.
Outside Director of The Nomura Trustand Banking Co., Ltd.
Outside Director of Nomura AssetManagement Co., Ltd.

Brief Personal History

Apr. 1982

Joined the Company

Apr. 2004

Senior Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Oct. 2008

Executive Managing Directorof the Company
Senior Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Jun. 2010

Senior Corporate Managing
Director of the Company
Senior Corporate Managing
Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.

Apr. 2012

Senior Corporate Managing
Director of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.

Jun. 2012

Executive Managing Director
and Senior Corporate
Managing Director of Nomura
Securities Co., Ltd.

Apr. 2013

Executive Managing Director
and Chief of Staff of theCompany (Current)
Executive Managing Directorand Executive Vice Presidentof Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
(Current)

Executive Managing Director
Chief Financial Officer
Executive Managing Director and SeniorCorporate Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Apr. 1982

Joined the Company

Apr. 2004

Senior Managing Director of
the Company
Senior Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Financial Officer of Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd.

Apr. 2006

Senior Managing Director of
Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Apr. 2007

Senior Managing Director(Executive Officer) of theCompany

Apr. 2008

Senior Managing Director of
the Company

Apr. 2013

Executive Managing Directorof the Company (Current)
Chief Financial Officer of theCompany (Current)
Executive Managing Director
and Senior Corporate
Managing Director of Nomura
Securities Co., Ltd. (Current)
Financial Officer of Nomura
Securities Co., Ltd. (Current)78

B. Compensation.
The overview of Nomura Group’s compensation framework is as follows:(1) Compensation policy
We have developed our compensation policy for both executives and employees of Nomura Group to enable
us to achieve sustainable growth, realize a long-term increase in shareholder value, deliver client excellence,compete in a global market and enhance our reputation. Our compensation policy is based around the following
six key themes. It aims to:1.

align with Nomura values and strategies;2.

reflect firm, division and individual performance;3.

establish appropriate performance measurement with a focus on risk;

4.

align employee and shareholder interests;

5.

establish appropriate compensation structures; and6.

ensure robust governance and control processes.

(2) Compensation governance
The Compensation Committee of Nomura, which is a statutory committee, is responsible for approving ouroverall compensation policy and for ensuring that Nomura Group’s compensation framework supports ourbusiness strategy.
The Company has delegated authority to the Human Resources Committee (“HRC”) to develop and to
implement Nomura Group’s compensation policy. The HRC’s responsibilities include:•

approving the compensation framework, while taking into account necessary factors to ensure that all
staff, including members of executive management, are provided with appropriate incentives to enhancetheir performance and are rewarded for their individual contributions to the success of our businessglobally,•

approving the total bonus pool and its allocation to each business,•reviewing the performance measures of senior executives to ensure that compensations reflect theperformance of both individuals and our business globally,•

continually reviewing the appropriateness and relevance of the compensation policy and•approving any major changes in employee benefits structures globally.

Current members include the Group CEO (as Chairman of the Committee), Group COO, CFO, Chief Risk
Officer (CRO), Chief of Staff and heads of Human Resources.

79

(3) Nomura’s compensation framework
The outline of our compensation framework is as follows:
Compensation
Components

Fixed Compensation

Variable Compensation

PurposesSpecific Elements•

Base salary•

Rewards individuals for their knowledge,
skills, competencies and experiences•

Reflects local labor market standards•

Reflects practices of local labor markets
to deliver allowances as a part of fixedcompensation to individuals•

Housing allowances•

Overtime pay

Rewards team and individual
performances, and their contribution toresults as well as strategic and future
value

•

Cash bonuses•

Deferred compensation••

Reflects appropriate internal and marketbased comparisons•Reflects broad view on compensation,
including individual performances,approaches to risk, compliance and crossdivisional cooperation

Note: Benefits are driven by local market regulations and practices, and are not included in the above.
(4) Outline of variable compensations
Cash bonuses
A proportion of the variable compensation is delivered in the form of a cash payment following the end of
the fiscal year. Individuals with higher levels of compensation receive a lower proportion in cash. This is in linewith regulatory guidance, and while the policy is global in application, specific local regulatory requirements will
be adhered to when deciding on proportions of cash bonuses.
Deferred compensation
Certain senior management and employees whose compensation is above a certain level receive a portion of
their variable compensation in the form of deferred compensation vehicles. By linking the economic value to
Nomura’s stock price or imposing certain vesting periods in place, such plans will:•align employee interest with that of shareholders;•increase employee retention through providing opportunities to grow personal wealth over certain
period from the grant to vesting; and•encourage cross-divisional and cross-regional collaboration by focusing individuals on a common goalof the long-term increase in corporate value.

With these benefits, deferred compensation plans are also recommended by regulators of key jurisdictions inwhich we operate.
The deferral period for our deferred compensation plans is three or more years in principle. This is in linewith the “Principles for Sound Compensation Practices” issued by the FSB, which recommends, among others, adeferral period of three or more years.
80In addition, deferred compensation shall be reduced or forfeited in case of:•voluntary resignation•material restatement in financial statements•

material violation of policies of Nomura; and•material detriment to the business or reputation of Nomura.

Also, deferred compensations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 granted to senior management andemployees who receive a certain level of compensations shall be reduced or forfeited in case of a material
downturn in performance of Nomura and/or a material failure of risk management.
Nomura has 1. Core deferral plans, 2. Supplemental deferral plans and 3. Multi-Year Performance Deferralplan as its deferred compensation.
1. Core deferral plans(a) Stock Acquisition Right (“SAR”) Plan
Nomura has issued the following two types of SARs.
•

SAR Plan A
Options are awarded with an exercise price higher than Nomura’s stock price on the date of grant.
There is a certain period set between the date of grant and the date of vesting. They are qualified as
SARs under Japanese taxation laws and therefore have been issued mainly to employees in Japan.

•

SAR Plan B
This plan is intended to offer a similar economic effect as restricted stock, as commonly used in the
U.S. and Europe. Options are granted with an exercise price of ¥1 per share. There is a certain period
set between the date of grant and the date of vesting.

(b) Notional Stock Unit (“NSU”) Plan
This is a cash-settled plan that has been designed to replicate the key features of the SAR Plan B describedabove. This allows equity-linked awards to be made in countries where SARs are less favorably treated from tax
or other perspectives.
2. Supplemental deferral plans
We also introduced the following deferral plans for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. These plans were
offered to certain senior management and employees in addition to the Core deferral plans. The plans reinforce
our goals of retaining and motivating our key talent in the competitive market place.
(a) Collared Notional Stock Unit (“CSU”) Plan
This plan is linked to the value of the Nomura’s stock price subject to a cap and a floor.
(b) Notional Indexed Unit (“NIU”) Plan
This plan is linked to a world stock index quoted by Morgan Stanley Capital International. Other material
terms, including deferral period and vesting conditions, are the same as those for CSUs.
81

3. Multi-Year Performance Deferral (“MYPD”) plan
We also introduced MYPD as a part of deferred compensation for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 tosenior management and employees with certain responsibilities. Number of units to be granted upon achieving acertain performance target is notified to applicable candidates in advance. At the end of a 2 year performance
period, number of units is adjusted, subject to a degree of achievement, and granted in the form of Plan B SARs
or NSUs. In case of performance below certain levels, no SARs or NSUs will be granted.
(5) Consistency with risk management and linkage to performance
In determining the aggregate compensation, Nomura considers the ratio of personnel expense against
income (after a certain risk adjustment and before deduction of tax and personnel expenses). Risk adjustment ofincome is done by deducting a certain proportion of economic capital from each division’s revenue. Sucheconomic capital comprehensively recognizes quantitatively assessed risks, and reflects various risks including
market, credit, liquidity, and operational risks.
Nomura recognizes that its aggregate compensation maintains consistency with the current financial
soundness and future prospects of Nomura, and that it does not have significant impact on capital adequacy in the
future.
(6) Compensation for Directors and Executive Officers
Pursuant to the fundamental approach and framework of compensation as described above, and as acompany which adopts the committee-based corporate governance system, the Compensation Committee of
Nomura determines compensation of its Directors and Executive Officers in accordance with the applicablecompensation policy.
1

Aggregate compensation

Number of Directors or
Executive Officers(1)Millions of yen
Year ended March 31, 2013
Basic Compensation(2) Bonus Deferred Compensation(3)Total

Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Outside Directors) . . . . . . .
Executive Officers . . . . . . .

12
(8)
8

¥ 340
(157)
353

¥ 13
(—)
29

¥116
(—)
274

¥ 469
(157)
656

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20

¥ 693

¥ 42

¥390

¥1,125(1) Include 1 Director (including 1 Outside Director) and 3 Executive Officers who resigned in June and July
2012. There were 11 Directors and 5 Executive Officers as of March 31, 2013. Compensation to Directors
who were concurrently serving as Executive Officers is included in that of Executive Officers.
(2) Basic compensation of ¥693 million includes other compensation (commuter pass allowance) of ¥1 million
that has been provided.
(3) Deferred compensation (such as stock options) granted during the year ended March 31, 2013 and prior isrecognized as expense in the financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2013.
(4) Subsidiaries of the Company paid ¥90 million to Outside Directors as compensation etc. for theirdirectorship at those subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2013.
(5) The Company abolished retirement bonuses to Directors in 2001.

82

2.

Individual compensation of Directors and Executive Officers receiving ¥100 million or more

Name

Company

Category

Nobuyuki Koga . . . . . . . . . .
Koji Nagai . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NomuraNomuraAtsushi Yoshikawa . . . . . . .

NomuraToshio Morita . . . . . . . . . . .

NomuraToshihiro Iwasaki . . . . . . . .

NomuraDirector
Director,
Representative
Executive
Officer(Group CEO)
Director,
Representative
Executive
Officer(Group COO)
Executive
Officer
Executive
Officer

Millions of yen
Fixed Remuneration(Basic Compensation)
Variable Compensation(1)EquityDeferredCompensation
Cash Compensation
Base Salary(SARs)
Total Bonus(SARs, etc.)
Total Total
82
65

—
12

82
77

—
—

74
89

74
89

156
166

62

10

72

1

87

88

160

40

9

49

17

66

83

132

60

13

73

6

41

47

120

(1) Variable Compensation indicates the amount determined as remuneration based on the performance during the fiscal year ended March
31, 2013 (“this fiscal year”).

Stock Acquisition Rights (“SARs”)
March 31, 2013
Number of
Shares under
SARs

Series of SARs

Allotment Date

Stock Acquisition Rights No.9

April 24, 2006

Stock Acquisition Rights No.10

June 12, 2006

Stock Acquisition Rights No.11

July 14, 2006

Stock Acquisition Rights No.13

April 25, 2007

Stock Acquisition Rights No.14

June 21, 2007

Stock Acquisition Rights No.15

August 1, 2007

Stock Acquisition Rights No.16

August 1, 2007

Stock Acquisition Rights No.17

August 1, 2007

83

Exercise Periodof SARs

Exercise
Price perPaid-in
Share under Amount for
SARs
SARs

35,100 From April 25, 2008 ¥1
to April 24, 2013
147,900 From June 13, 20081
to June 12, 2013
1,727,000 From July 7, 2008
1,741
to July 6, 2013
213,300 From April 26, 20091
to April 25, 2014
326,600 From June 22, 20091
to June 21, 2014
113,000 From August 2, 2009 1,883
to August 1, 2014
1,799,000 From August 2, 2009 1,883
to August 1, 2014
191,600 From August 2, 20091
to August 1, 2014

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

March 31, 2013

Series of SARs

Stock Acquisition Rights No.18

Allotment Date

Number of
Shares under
SARs

October 19, 2007

Exercise Periodof SARs

Exercise
Price perPaid-in
Share under Amount for
SARs
SARs

21,800 From October 20, 2009 ¥1
to October 19, 2014
Stock Acquisition Rights No.19
April 23, 2008
511,400 From April 24, 20101
to April 23, 2015
Stock Acquisition Rights No.20
June 23, 2008
31,300From June 24, 20101
to June 23, 2015
Stock Acquisition Rights No.21
June 23, 2008
286,800
From June 24, 20101
to June 23, 2015
Stock Acquisition Rights No.22 August 5, 2008
110,000 From August 6, 2010
1,298
to August 5, 2015
Stock Acquisition Rights No.23 August 5, 2008
1,874,000 From August 6, 2010
1,298
to August 5, 2015
Stock Acquisition Rights No.24 August 5, 2008
3,000 From August 6, 20101
to August 5, 2015
Stock Acquisition Rights No.26 November 10, 2008
5,200 From November 11, 20101
to November 10, 2015
Stock Acquisition Rights No.27 November 10, 2008
5,200 From November 11, 20101
to November 10, 2015
Stock Acquisition Rights No.28
April 30, 2009
473,300
From May 1, 20111
to April 30, 2016
Stock Acquisition Rights No.29
June 16, 2009
229,400
From June 17, 20111
to June 16, 2016
Stock Acquisition Rights No.30
June 16, 2009
381,400
From June 17, 20111
to June 16, 2016
Stock Acquisition Rights No.31 August 5, 2009
176,000 From August 6, 2011
737
to August 5, 2016
Stock Acquisition Rights No.32 August 5, 2009
2,288,000 From August 6, 2011
737
to August 5, 2016
Stock Acquisition Rights No.34
May 18, 2010
1,346,200
From May 19, 20121
to May 18, 2017
Stock Acquisition Rights No.35
May 18, 2010
2,330,700
From May 19, 20121
to May 18, 2017
Stock Acquisition Rights No.36
May 18, 2010
2,211,800
From May 19, 20131
to May 18, 2017
Stock Acquisition Rights No.37
July 28, 2010
4,437,700 From April 30, 20121
to April 29, 2017
Stock Acquisition Rights No.38
July 28, 2010
9,015,400 From April 30, 2013
1
to April 29, 2018
Stock Acquisition Rights No.39 November 16, 2010 2,793,700 From November 16, 2012478
to November 15, 2017
Stock Acquisition Rights No.40
June 7, 2011
4,878,100
From May 25, 20121
to May 24, 2018
Stock Acquisition Rights No.41
June 7, 201118,879,800
From May 25, 20131
to May 24, 2018
Stock Acquisition Rights No.42
June 7, 2011
18,843,400
From May 25, 20141
to May 24, 2018
Stock Acquisition Rights No.43 November 16, 2011 2,817,000 From November 16, 2013299
to November 15, 2018
Stock Acquisition Rights No.44
June 5, 2012
13,031,700 From April 20, 2013
1
to April 19, 2018
Stock Acquisition Rights No.45
June 5, 2012
13,003,400 From April 20, 20141
to April 19, 2019
Stock Acquisition Rights No.46
June 5, 2012
12,894,300 From April 20, 2015
1
to April 19, 2020
84

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

March 31, 2013

Series of SARs

Allotment Date

Number of
Shares under
SARs

Stock Acquisition Rights No.47

June 5, 2012

5,034,500

Exercise
Price perPaid-in
Share under Amount for
SARs
SARs

Exercise Periodof SARs

From April 20, 2016
to April 19, 2021
Stock Acquisition Rights No.48
June 5, 2012
5,024,900
From April 20, 2017
to April 19, 2022
Stock Acquisition Rights No.49
June 5, 2012
1,874,900 From October 20, 2015
to April 19, 2021
Stock Acquisition Rights No.50
June 5, 2012
1,873,300 From October 20, 2016
to April 19, 2022
Stock Acquisition Rights No.51 November 13, 2012 2,847,800 From November 13, 2014
to November 12, 2019

¥

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

298

0

(1) SARs (including those granted to Directors and Executive Officers of Nomura which are stated in the tablebelow) are issued in conjunction with deferred compensation plan.
(2) The number of shares issuable under SARs is subject to adjustments under certain circumstances including
stock split.
SARs Held by Directors and Executive Officers of Nomura

Number of
Shares under
SARs

Series of SARs

SARs No.10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.41 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.42 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.45 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.46 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.47 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs No.48 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10,30043,00021,80015,00026,0008,000
26,7009,000
45,0003,000
162,700
45,00018,00019,00040,00013,400274,700
48,500213,800
271,200
271,000
76,40076,00075,80032,30032,200March 31, 2013
Numbers of Holders
Directors andExecutive Officers(excluding
Outside Directors) Outside Directors

1
8
2
2
6
1
3
1
7

—
1
1
1
—
1
—
3
—

—

1
1
2
1
2
6
1
6
1
7
9
9
6
6
6
6
6

—
3
—
3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefits
See Note 15 “Employee benefit plans” in our consolidated financial statements included in this annual
report.
85

C. Board Practices.
Information Concerning Directors
The Companies Act states that a company which adopts the committee-based corporate governance system(“Committee System”) must establish three committees; a nomination committee, an audit committee and acompensation committee. The members of each committee are chosen from the company’s directors, and the
majority of the members of each committee must be outside directors. Under the Committee System, the board of
directors is entitled to establish the basic management policy for the company, has decision-making authority
over certain prescribed matters, and supervises the execution by the executive officers of their duties. Executive
officers and representative executive officers appointed by a resolution adopted by the board of directors manage
the business affairs of the company, based on a delegation of authority by the board of directors.
The Company adopted the Committee System by amending the Company’s Articles of Incorporation by
way of a special resolution adopted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 26, 2003. Through the
adoption of the Committee System, the Company aims to strengthen management oversight, increase thetransparency of the Company’s management and expedite the decision-making process within the Nomura
Group. An outline of the Company’s Board of Directors, Nomination Committee, Audit Committee andCompensation Committee is provided below.
Board of Directors
The Company’s Board of Directors consists of Directors who are elected at a general meeting ofshareholders and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that the number of Directors shall not exceed
20. The term of office of each Director expires upon the conclusion of the ordinary general meeting ofshareholders with respect to the last fiscal year ending within one year after their appointment. Directors may
serve any number of consecutive terms. From among its members, the Company’s Board of Directors elects the
Chairman. The Company’s Board of Directors met 11 times during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. As agroup, the Directors attended approximately 97% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors
during the year. The Board of Directors has the authority to determine the Company’s basic management policy
and supervise the execution by the Executive Officers of their duties. Although the Board of Directors also has
the authority to make decisions with regard to the Company’s business, most of this authority has been delegatedto the Executive Officers by a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors. There are no Directors’ service
contracts with the Company or any of its subsidiaries providing for benefits upon termination of employment.
Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee, in accordance with the Company’s Regulations of the Nomination Committee,
determines the details of any proposals concerning the election and dismissal of Directors to be submitted togeneral meetings of shareholders by the Board of Directors. The Nomination Committee met three times during
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. As a group, the member Directors attended 100% of the total number of
meetings of the Nomination Committee during the year. As of June 26, 2013, the members of the Nomination
Committee are Nobuyuki Koga, Masahiro Sakane and Takao Kusakari. Nobuyuki Koga is the Chairman of thiscommittee.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee, in accordance with the Company’s Regulations of the Audit Committee, (i) audits theexecution by the Directors and the Executive Officers of their duties and the preparation of audit reports and(ii) determines the details of proposals concerning the election, dismissal or non-reappointment of the accounting
auditor to be submitted to general meetings of shareholders by the Board of Directors. With respect to financial
reporting, the Audit Committee has the statutory duty to examine financial statements and business reports to beprepared by Executive Officers designated by the Board of Directors and is authorized to report its opinion to theordinary general meeting of shareholders.
86The Audit Committee met 22 times during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. As a group, the member
Directors attended 100% of the total number of meetings of the Audit Committee during the year. As of June 26,
2013, the members of the Audit Committee are Tsuguoki Fujinuma, Toshinori Kanemoto and Hiroyuki Suzuki.
Tsuguoki Fujinuma is the Chairman of this Committee.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee, in accordance with the Company’s Regulations of the Compensation
Committee, determines the Company’s policy with respect to the determination of the details of each Directorand Executive Officer’s compensation. The Compensation Committee also determines the details of each
Director and Executive Officer’s actual compensation. The Compensation Committee met five times during the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. As a group, the member Directors attended 93% of the total number of
meetings of the Compensation Committee during the year. As of June 26, 2013, the members of theCompensation Committee are Nobuyuki Koga, Masahiro Sakane and Takao Kusakari. Nobuyuki Koga is the
Chairman of this Committee.
Limitation of Liabilities of Outside Directors
The Company has entered into agreements to limit Companies Act Article 423 Paragraph 1 liability fordamages (limitation of liability agreements) with each of the following Outside Directors: Masahiro Sakane,
Toshinori Kanemoto, Tsuguoki Fujinuma, Takao Kusakari, Dame Clara Furse, and Michael Lim Choo San.
Liability under each such agreement is limited to either ¥20 million or the amount prescribed by laws andregulations, whichever is greater.
Information Concerning Executive Officers
Executive Officers of the Company are appointed by the Board of Directors, and the Company’s Articles ofIncorporation provide that the number of Executive Officers shall not exceed 45. The term of office of each
Executive Officer expires upon the conclusion of the first meeting of the Board of Directors convened after theordinary general meeting of shareholders for the last fiscal year ending within one year after each Executive
Officer’s assumption of office. Executive Officers may serve any number of consecutive terms. Executive
Officers have the authority to determine matters delegated to them by resolutions adopted by the Board of
Directors and to execute business activities.
D. Employees
The following table shows the number of our employees as of the dates indicated:2011

As of March 31
2012
2013

Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,918 21,609 16,030
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,353
4,014
3,618
Americas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,348
2,420
2,271
Asia and Oceania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,252
6,352
6,037
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

26,871

34,39527,956

As of March 31, 2013, we had 16,030 employees in Japan, including 9,489 in our Retail Division, 849 in
our Asset Management Division and 1,632 in our Wholesale Division. Overseas, we had 11,926 employees, ofwhich 3,618 were located in Europe, 2,271 in the Americas, and 6,037 in Asia and Oceania.

87During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 NLB one of NHI’s affiliated companies, sold shares of
Nomura Real Estate Holdings, Inc. As a result, Nomura Real Estate Holdings, Inc. is no longer a consolidated
subsidiary of NHI, thus the number of employees decreased significantly compared to the previous year.
As of March 2013, 7,735 of Nomura Securities’ employees in Japan were members of Nomura’s
employees’ union, with which we have a labor contract. Between the company and the labor union, we had been
holding constant discussions to develop solutions on labor related matters.
We have not experienced any strikes or other labor disputes in Japan as well as overseas and consider our
employee relations to be excellent.
E. Share Ownership.
The following table shows the number of shares owned by our Directors and Executive Officers as of
May 31, 2013. As of that date, none of them owned 1% or more of our issued and outstanding shares. None of
the shares referred to below have different voting rights.
Directors
Number of
Shareholdings

Name

Nobuyuki Koga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Koji Nagai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Atsushi Yoshikawa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hiroyuki Suzuki . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
David Benson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Masahiro Sakane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Toshinori Kanemoto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tsuguoki Fujinuma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Takao Kusakari . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dame Clara Furse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Michael Lim Choo San . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

158,463
95,500125,353
74,892—30,000—25,170———Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

509,378

Executive Officers
Name

Number of
Shareholdings

Koji Nagai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Atsushi Yoshikawa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Toshio Morita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Toshihiro Iwasaki . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shoichi Nagamatsu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shigesuke Kashiwagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

See above
See above
106,481
27,62152,932
34,200Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

221,234

For information regarding stock options granted to our Directors and Executive Officers, see under Item 6.Bof this annual report.

88

Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A. Major Shareholders.
The Company understands that there is no major shareholder who owns more than 5% of our outstanding
common stock on the register of shareholders as of March 31, 2013.
To our knowledge, we are not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, by any
government or by any other natural or legal person severally or jointly. We know of no arrangements theoperation of which may at a later time result in a change of control of Nomura. Also as of March 31, 2013, there
were 271 Nomura shareholders of record with addresses in the U.S., and those U.S. holders held 391,052,735
shares of the Company’s common stock, representing 10.2% of Nomura’s then outstanding common stock. As of
March 31, 2013, there were 22,948,546 ADSs outstanding, representing 22,948,546 shares of the Company’scommon stock or 0.6% of Nomura’s then outstanding common stock. Our major shareholders above do not havedifferent voting rights.
B. Related Party Transactions.
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
NRI develops and manages computer systems and provides research services and management consulting
services. We are one of the major clients of NRI.
We held 38.8% of NRI’s outstanding share capital as of March 31, 2013.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, we purchased ¥55,098 million worth of software and computerequipment, paid NRI ¥48,518 million for other services, and received ¥4,272 million as rents from NRI.
Directors
There were no significant transactions.
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Information
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information.
Financial Statements
The information required by this item is set forth in our consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this annual report.
Legal Proceedings
For a discussion of our litigation and related matters, see Note 22 “Contingencies—Investigations, lawsuits
and other legal proceedings” in the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.
Dividend Policy
For our dividend policy, see “Capital Management—Dividends” under Item 5.B of this annual report.
89

B. Significant Changes.
Except as disclosed in this annual report, there have been no significant changes since March 31, 2013.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
A. Offer and Listing Details.
Price History
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low sale prices of ourcommon stock on the Tokyo Stock Exchange and the reported high and low share prices of our ADS on the New
York Stock Exchange.
Tokyo Stock Exchange
Price Per Share ofCommon Stock
High
Low

Year ended March 31,

Annual highs and lows2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Quarterly highs and lows2012
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Monthly highs and lows2013 (calendar year)
January . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
February . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
May . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
June (through June 26) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

New York Stock Exchange
Price Per Share of ADS
High
Low

1,918
934
717
436
608

403
498
361
223
241

17.89
9.50
7.67
5.21
6.30

3.96
5.35
4.75
2.91
3.05

436
410
327
417

368
273
223
238

5.21
5.04
4.12
4.93

4.61
3.51
2.91
3.01

381
311
505
608

241
245
261
463

4.53
3.91
5.89
6.30

3.05
3.13
3.36
5.24

533
564
608
799
980
786

463
507
533
535
765
687

6.14
5.99
6.30
8.27
9.64
8.06

5.24
5.42
5.86
5.76
7.68
7.01

B. Plan of Distribution.
Not applicable.
C. Markets.
The principal trading market for the Company’s Common Stock is the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The
Company’s Common Stock has been listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, the Osaka Securities Exchange andthe Nagoya Stock Exchange, since 1961.
In December 2001, the Company listed its Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange in the form of
ADSs evidenced by ADRs. Each ADS represents one share of Common Stock. The Company’s Common Stock
has been listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange since 1994.
90

D. Selling Shareholders.
Not applicable.
E. Dilution.
Not applicable.
F. Expenses of the Issue.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Additional Information
A. Share Capital.
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Objects and Purposes in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation
Article 2 of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, which is an exhibit to this annual report, states theCompany’s purpose.
Provisions Regarding the Company’s Directors
Although there is no provision in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation as to a Director’s power to voteon a proposal or arrangement in which the Director is materially interested, under the Companies Act and theCompany’s Regulations of the Board of Directors, a Director must abstain from voting on such matters at
meetings of the Board of Directors.
As a company organized under the Committee System of corporate governance, the compensation of theCompany’s Directors and Executive Officers is determined by the Compensation Committee (see Item 6.C
above). The Compensation Committee establishes the policy with respect to the determination of the individualcompensation (including variable compensation) of each of the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers andmakes determinations in accordance with that compensation policy.
With respect to borrowing powers, these as well as other powers relating to the management of the business(with the exception of certain exclusions specified under the Companies Act) have been delegated to the
Executive Officers by the Board of Directors as a company organized under the Committee System.
There is no mandatory retirement age for the Company’s Directors under the Companies Act or theCompany’s Articles of Incorporation.
There is no requirement concerning the number of shares an individual must hold in order to qualify him or
her to serve as a Director of the Company under the Companies Act or the Company’s Articles of Incorporation.
Pursuant to the Companies Act and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, the Company may, by aresolution of the Company’s Board of Directors, release the liabilities of any Directors or Executive Officers to
the Company for damages suffered by the Company due to their acts taken in good faith and without grossnegligence, to the extent permitted by the Companies Act and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation. In
addition, the Company may execute with outside Directors agreements that limit their liabilities to the Company
91

for damages suffered by the Company due to their acts in good faith and without gross negligence, to the extent
permitted by the Companies Act and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation. See “Limitation of Liabilities of
Outside Directors” under Item 6.C above.
Holding of the Company’s Shares by Foreign Investors
Other than the Japanese unit share system that is described in “Common Stock—Japanese Unit Share
System” below, no limitations on the rights of non-residents or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting
rights with respect to the Company’s shares are imposed by law, the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or theCompany’s other constituent documents.
Common Stock
The following describes material features of the shares of the Company’s common stock, and includes abrief overview of the material provisions of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Share Handling
Regulations, as currently in effect, and of the Companies Act and related legislation. In this “Common Stock”
section, unless the context otherwise requires, “shares” means shares of the Company’s common stock and“shareholders” means holders of shares of the Company’s common stock.
GeneralUnder the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, the Company is authorized to issue 6,000,000,000 shares,of which 3,822,562,601 shares were issued as of March 31, 2013. All issued shares are fully-paid and nonassessable.
On January 5, 2009, a central clearing system for shares of Japanese listed companies was establishedpursuant to the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, Shares, Etc. (including regulations promulgatedthereunder; the “Book-Entry Law”), and the shares of all Japanese companies listed on any Japanese stock
exchange, including the Company’s shares, became subject to this clearing system. On the same day, all existing
share certificates for such shares became null and void. At present, Japan Securities Depository Center, Inc.
(“JASDEC”) is the only institution that is designated by the relevant authorities as a clearing house which ispermitted to engage in the clearing operations of shares of Japanese listed companies under the Book-Entry Law.
Under this clearing system, in order for any person to hold, sell or otherwise dispose of shares of Japanese listedcompanies, they must have an account at an “account managing institution” unless such person has an account at
JASDEC. “Account managing institutions” are financial instruments traders (i.e., securities companies), banks,
trust companies and certain other financial institutions which meet the requirements prescribed by the BookEntry Law, and only those financial institutions that meet further stringent requirements of the Book-Entry Law
can open accounts directly at JASDEC. For purposes of the description under this “Common Stock” section, we
assume that the relevant person has no account at JASDEC.
Under the Book-Entry Law, any transfer of shares is effected through book-entry, and title to the shares
passes to the transferee at the time when the transferred number of the shares is recorded in the transferee’s
account by an account managing institution. The holder of an account at an account managing institution ispresumed to be the legal owner of the shares held in such account.
Under the Companies Act and the Book-Entry Law, except in limited circumstances, a shareholder musthave his or her name and address registered in the Company’s register of shareholders in order to assert
shareholders’ rights against the Company. Such registration is generally made upon receipt by the Company ofnecessary information from JASDEC. See “Share Registrar” and “Record Date” below.
Non-resident shareholders are required to appoint a standing proxy in Japan or provide a mailing address inJapan. Each such shareholder must give notice of such standing proxy or mailing address to the relevant account92

managing institution. Such notice will be forwarded to the Company through JASDEC. Japanese securities
companies and commercial banks customarily act as standing proxies and provide related services for standard
fees. Notices from the Company to non-resident shareholders are delivered to such standing proxies or mailingaddresses.
The registered holder of deposited shares underlying the ADSs is the depositary for the ADSs. Accordingly,
holders of ADSs will not be able to directly assert shareholders’ rights.
Dividends
Under the Companies Act, distributions of cash or other assets by joint stock corporations to theirshareholders, so called “dividends,” are referred to as “distributions of Surplus” (“Surplus” is defined in“Restriction on Distributions of Surplus” below). The Company may make distributions of Surplus to theshareholders any number of times per fiscal year, subject to certain limitations described in “Restriction on
Distributions of Surplus.” As a company meeting the necessary requirements, the Companies Act allows for theCompany’s Articles of Incorporation to authorize the Company’s Board of Directors to make decisions regarding
distributions of Surplus (with the exceptions of certain exclusions specified under the Companies Act).
Under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, dividends, if any, may be distributed to shareholders (orpledgees) appearing in the register of shareholders as of June 30, September 30, December 31 or March 31 ofeach year, pursuant to a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors. In addition, under the Companies Act
and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, the Company may (but is not obligated to) make further
distributions of Surplus by a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors. However, the Company equally
may decide not to pay dividends for any given period, regardless of the amount of Surplus the Company has.
Under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, the Company is not obliged to pay any dividends in cashthat are left unclaimed for a period of three years after the date on which they first became payable.
Distributions of Surplus may be distributed in cash or in kind in proportion to the number of shares held by
each shareholder. A resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors authorizing a distribution of Surplus mustspecify the kind and aggregate book value of the assets to be distributed, the manner of allocation of such assets
to shareholders and the effective date of the distribution. If a distribution of Surplus is to be made in kind, theCompany may, pursuant to a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors, grant to the Company’s
shareholders the right to require the Company to make such distribution in cash instead of in kind. If no suchright is granted to shareholders, the relevant distribution of Surplus must be approved by a special resolution of
the Company’s general meeting of shareholders.
For information as to Japanese taxes on dividends, see “Japanese Taxation” under Item 10.E of this annual
report.
Restriction on Distributions of Surplus
When the Company makes a distribution of Surplus, the Company must, until the aggregate amount of theCompany’s additional paid-in capital and legal reserve reaches one-quarter of the Company’s stated capital, set
aside in the Company’s additional paid-in capital and/or legal reserve an amount equal to one-tenth of theamount of Surplus so distributed in accordance with an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice of Japan.

93

The amount of Surplus at any given time must be calculated in accordance with the following formula:
A + B + C + D - (E + F + G)
In the above formula:“A” =the total amount of ‘other capital surplus’ and ‘other retained earnings’ each such amount beingthat appearing on the Company’s non-consolidated balance sheets as of the end of the last fiscal
year;

“B” =

(if the Company has disposed of treasury stock after the end of the last fiscal year) the amount of
the consideration for such treasury stock received by the Company less the book value thereof;“C” =(if the Company has reduced stated capital after the end of the last fiscal year) the amount of such
reduction less the portion thereof that has been transferred to additional paid-in capital or legal
reserve (if any);“D” =(if the Company has reduced additional paid-in capital or legal reserve after the end of the last
fiscal year) the amount of such reduction less the portion thereof that has been transferred to statedcapital (if any);“E” =(if the Company has cancelled treasury stock after the end of the last fiscal year) the book value ofsuch treasury stock;“F” =(if the Company has distributed Surplus to shareholders after the end of the last fiscal year) the
total book value of Surplus so distributed;“G” =certain other amounts set forth in ordinances of the Ministry of Justice, including (if the Company
has reduced Surplus and increased stated capital, additional paid-in capital or legal reserve after
the end of the last fiscal year) the amount of such reduction and (if the Company has distributed
Surplus to shareholders after the end of the last fiscal year) the amount set aside in the Company’s
additional paid-in capital or legal reserve (if any) as required by ordinances of the Ministry ofJustice.

The aggregate book value of Surplus distributed by the Company may not exceed a prescribed distributableamount (the “Distributable Amount”), as calculated on the effective date of such distribution. The Distributable
Amount at any given time shall be equal to the amount of Surplus less the aggregate of the following:(a) the book value of the Company’s treasury stock;(b) the amount of consideration for the Company’s treasury stock disposed of after the end of the last fiscal
year; and(c) certain other amounts set forth in ordinances of the Ministry of Justice, including (if the sum of onehalf of goodwill and the deferred assets exceeds the total of stated capital, additional paid-in capital andlegal reserve, each such amount being that appearing on the Company’s non-consolidated balance
sheets as of the end of the last fiscal year) all or a certain part of such excess amount as calculated inaccordance with ordinances of the Ministry of Justice.
If the Company becomes, at the Company’s option, a company with respect to which consolidated balance
sheets should also be taken into consideration in the calculation of the Distributable Amount (renketsu haito kisei
tekiyo kaisha), the Company will be further required to deduct from the amount of Surplus the excess amount, if
any, of (x) the total amount of shareholders’ equity appearing on the Company’s non-consolidated balance sheets
as of the end of the last fiscal year and certain other amounts set forth in ordinances of the Ministry of Justiceover (y) the total amount of shareholders’ equity and certain other amounts set forth in ordinances of the Ministryof Justice appearing on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of the end of the last fiscal year.
If the Company has prepared non-consolidated interim financial statements as described below, and if suchinterim financial statements have been approved by the Board of Directors or (if so required by the Companies
94Act) by a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders, the Distributable Amount must be adjusted to take into
account the amount of profit or loss, and the amount of consideration for the Company’s treasury stock disposedof, during the period in respect of which such interim financial statements have been prepared. The Company
may prepare non-consolidated interim financial statements consisting of a balance sheet as of any date
subsequent to the end of the last fiscal year and an income statement for the period from the first day of thecurrent fiscal year to the date of such balance sheet. Interim financial statements so prepared by the Company
must be approved by the Board of Directors and audited by the Company’s Audit Committee and independent
auditors, as required by ordinances of the Ministry of Justice.
Stock Splits
The Company may at any time split the issued shares into a greater number of shares by a resolution of theCompany’s Board of Directors, and in accordance with the Companies Act, the Company’s Board of Directors
has adopted a resolution delegating powers to make such stock splits to the Company’s executive management
board (“EMB”).
In accordance with the Companies Act, the Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a resolutiondelegating to the Company’s EMB powers to increase the number of authorized shares permitted to be issued up
to the number reflecting the rate of stock splits and to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to thiseffect without approval by a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders. For example, if each share became
three shares by way of a stock split, the EMB may increase the number of authorized shares from the current
6,000,000,000 shares to 18,000,000,000 shares.
Japanese Unit Share System
The Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that 100 shares constitute one “unit”. The Companies Act
permits the Company, by a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors, to reduce the number of shares
which constitutes one unit or abolish the unit share system, and amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation
to this effect without approval by a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders.
Transferability of Shares Constituting Less Than One Unit. Under the clearing system, shares constituting
less than one unit are transferable. Under the rules of the Japanese stock exchanges, however, shares constituting
less than one unit do not comprise a trading unit, except in limited circumstances, and accordingly may not besold on the Japanese stock exchanges.
Right of a Holder of Shares Constituting Less Than One Unit to Require the Company to Purchase Its
Shares. A holder of shares constituting less than one unit may at any time request the Company to purchase its
shares. Under the clearing system, such request must be made through the relevant account managing institution.
These shares will be purchased at (a) the closing price of the Company’s shares reported by the Tokyo Stock
Exchange on the day when the request to purchase is received by the Company’s share registrar or (b) if no saletakes place on the Tokyo Stock Exchange on that day, the price at which the sale of shares is effected on suchstock exchange immediately thereafter. An amount equal to the applicable handling fee will be deducted from theprice so determined pursuant to the Company’s Share Handling Regulations.
Purchase of Shares up to a Whole Unit for a Holder of Shares Constituting Less than One Unit. The
Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that a holder of shares constituting less than one unit may request
the Company to sell shares the Company may have to such holder so that the holder can raise the holder’sfractional ownership up to a whole unit. Under the clearing system, such request must be made through therelevant account managing institution. These shares will be sold at (a) the closing price of the Company’s shares
reported by the Tokyo Stock Exchange on the day when the request to sell is received by the Company’s shareregistrar or (b) if no sale has taken place on the Tokyo Stock Exchange on that day, the price at which sale of95

shares is effected on such stock exchange immediately thereafter. An amount equal to the applicable handling fee
will be added to the price so determined pursuant to the Company’s Share Handling Regulations.
Voting Rights of a Holder of Shares Constituting Less Than One Unit. A holder of shares constituting lessthan one unit cannot exercise any voting rights pertaining to those shares. In calculating the quorum for various
voting purposes, the aggregate number of shares constituting less than one unit will be excluded from the numberof outstanding shares. A holder of shares representing one or more whole units will have one vote for each wholeunit represented.
A holder of shares constituting less than one unit does not have any rights related to voting, such as the rightto participate in a demand for the dismissal of a Director, the right to participate in a demand for the convocationof a meeting of shareholders and the right to join with other shareholders to propose an agenda item to beaddressed at a meeting of shareholders. In addition, a holder of shares constituting less than one unit does nothave the right to institute a representative action by shareholders.
In accordance with the Companies Act, the Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that a holder ofshares constituting less than one unit does not have any other rights of a shareholder in respect of those shares,
other than those provided by the Company’s Articles of Incorporation which includes the following rights:•

to receive dividends,•

to receive cash or other assets in case of consolidation or split of shares, exchange or transfer of shares,
corporate split or merger,•

to be allotted rights to subscribe for free for new shares and stock acquisition rights when such rights are
granted to shareholders, and•to participate in any distribution of surplus assets upon liquidation.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The Company normally holds its ordinary general meeting of shareholders in June of each year. In addition,
the Company may hold an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders whenever necessary by giving at least
two weeks’ advance notice. Under the Companies Act, notice of any general meeting of shareholders must be
given to each shareholder having voting rights or, in the case of a non-resident shareholder, to his standing proxyor mailing address in Japan in accordance with the Company’s Share Handling Regulations, at least two weeks
prior to the date of the meeting.
Voting Rights
A shareholder is generally entitled to one vote per one unit of shares as described in this paragraph andunder the section entitled the “Japanese Unit Share System” above. In general, under the Companies Act, aresolution can be adopted at a general meeting of shareholders by the holders of a majority of the total number ofvoting rights represented at the meeting. However, if a corporate shareholder has one-quarter or more of its total
voting rights held by the Company or its subsidiary, or if the Company otherwise has actual control over suchcorporate shareholder, such corporate shareholder is not entitled to exercise its voting rights. The Companies Act
and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation require a quorum for the election of Directors of not less than onethird of the total number of voting rights. The Company’s shareholders are not entitled to cumulative voting in
the election of Directors. Shareholders may exercise their voting rights through proxies, provided that thoseproxies are also shareholders who have voting rights.

96

The Companies Act provides that certain important matters shall be approved by a “special resolution” of ageneral meeting of shareholders. The Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that the quorum for a special
resolution is one-third of the total number of voting rights and the approval of at least two-thirds of the voting
rights presented at the meeting is required for adopting a special resolution. Such important matters include:•

a reduction of stated capital,•

amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (except amendments which the Board of Directors (or under
the Committee System, Executive Officers) are authorized to make under the Companies Act),•

establishment of a 100% parent-subsidiary relationship by way of share exchange or share transfer
requiring shareholders’ approval,•a dissolution, merger or consolidation requiring shareholders’ approval,•a corporate split requiring shareholders’ approval,•

the transfer of the whole or an important part of the Company’s business,•

the taking over of the whole of the business of any other corporation requiring shareholders’ approval,•

any issuance of new shares or transfer of existing shares as treasury stock to persons other than theshareholders at a “specially favorable” price,•

any issuance of stock acquisition rights (including those incorporated in bonds with stock acquisitionrights) to persons other than the shareholders under “specially favorable” conditions,•purchase of shares by the Company from a specific shareholder other than the Company’s subsidiary,•consolidation of shares, and•release of part of directors’, independent auditor’s or executive officers’ liabilities to their corporation.

The voting rights of holders of ADSs are exercised by the depositary based on instructions from those
holders.
Subscription Rights
Holders of shares have no preemptive rights under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation when the
Company issues new shares. Under the Companies Act, the Company’s EMB, which has been delegated by theCompany’s Board of Directors with the authority to issue new shares, may, however, determine that shareholders
be given subscription rights in connection with a particular issue of new shares. In this case, such rights must be
given on uniform terms to all shareholders as of a specified record date with at least two weeks’ prior notice toshareholders of the record date.
Stock Acquisition Rights
The Company may issue stock acquisition rights (shinkabu yoyakuken). Holders of stock acquisition rights
are entitled to acquire shares from the Company, upon payment of the applicable exercise price, and subject toother terms and conditions thereof. The issuance of stock acquisition rights and bonds with stock acquisitionrights may be authorized by the Company’s EMB, which has been delegated by the Company’s Board of
Directors with the authority to issue stock acquisition rights, unless it is made under “specially favorable”
conditions in which case a special resolution of a general meeting of shareholders is required. In issuing stockacquisition rights, notice must be given at least two weeks prior to the date for allotment in the form of individual
notice or public notice. Under the Companies Act the Company will not be required to give such notice if theCompany makes a relevant securities filing or reporting under the FIEA at least two weeks prior to the date forallotment, subject to the requirements provided by the ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.
97

Liquidation Rights
In the event of liquidation, the assets remaining after payment of all debt securities and borrowings,
liquidation expenses and taxes will be distributed among shareholders in proportion to the number of shares theyown.
Liability to Further Calls or Assessments
All of the Company’s currently outstanding shares, including shares represented by the ADSs, are fully paid
and nonassessable.
Share Registrar
Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation (“Mitsubishi UFJ Trust”) is the share registrar for theCompany’s shares. Mitsubishi UFJ Trust’s office is located at 4-5, Marunouchi 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo,
100-8212 Japan. Mitsubishi UFJ Trust maintains the Company’s register of shareholders and registers the names
and addresses of the Company’s shareholders and other relevant information in the Company’s register ofshareholders upon notice thereof from JASDEC, as described in “Record Date” below.
Record Date
The close of business on June 30, September 30, December 31 and March 31 are the record dates for theCompany’s distributions of Surplus (dividends), if any. A holder of shares constituting one or more whole units,
who is registered as a holder in the Company’s register of shareholders at the close of business as of March 31, isalso entitled to exercise shareholders’ voting rights at the ordinary general meeting of shareholders with respect
to the fiscal year ended on March 31. In addition, the Company may set a record date for determining theshareholders entitled to other rights and for other purposes by giving at least two weeks’ public notice.
Under the Book-Entry Law, the Company is required to give notice of each record date to JASDEC at least
two weeks prior to such record date. JASDEC is required to promptly give the Company notice of the names andaddresses of the Company’s shareholders, the numbers of shares held by them and other relevant information asof such record date.
The shares are generally traded ex-dividend or ex-rights in the Japanese stock exchanges on the second
business day prior to the record date (or if the record date is not a business day, the third business day prior
thereto), for the purpose of dividends or rights offerings.
Acquisition of Own Shares
The Company may acquire its own shares (i) by soliciting all of the Company’s shareholders to offer to sell
the Company’s shares held by them (pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors), (ii) from a specificshareholder other than any of the Company’s subsidiaries (pursuant to a special resolution of a general meetingof shareholders), (iii) from any of the Company’s subsidiaries (pursuant to a resolution of the Board of
Directors), or (iv) by way of purchase on any Japanese stock exchange on which the Company’s shares are listed
or by way of tender offer (in either case pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors). In the case of(ii) above, any other shareholder may make a request to the Company that such other shareholder be included asa seller in the proposed purchase, provided that no such right will be available if the purchase price or any otherconsideration to be received by the relevant specific shareholder will not exceed the higher of (x) the last trading
price of the shares on the relevant stock exchange on the day immediately preceding the date on which theresolution mentioned in (ii) was adopted (or, if there is no trading in the shares on the stock exchange or if thestock exchange is not open on such day, the price at which the shares are first traded on such stock exchange98thereafter) and (y) if the shares are subject to a tender offer on the day immediately preceding the date on which
the resolution mentioned in (ii) above was adopted, the price of the shares under the agreement with respect tosuch tender offer on such day. This acquisition is subject to the condition that the aggregate amount of thepurchase price must not exceed the Distributable Amount as described in “Restriction on Distributions ofSurplus” above.
The Company may hold its shares acquired in compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act, andmay generally dispose of or cancel such shares by a resolution of the Board of Directors.
In addition, the Company may acquire its shares by means of repurchase of any number of sharesconstituting less than one unit upon the request of the holder of those shares, as described under “Japanese Unit
Share System” above.
Preferred Stock
The following is a description of material features of the Company’s preferred stock. The basic
characteristics of the Company’s preferred stock are set forth in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, anddetailed terms and conditions of the Company’s preferred stock are to be determined prior to the issuance thereof
by a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors or by Executive Officer(s) under authorities delegated by aresolution of the Company’s Board of Directors.
GeneralThe Company’s Articles of Incorporation include the possibility of issuing preferred stock. The Company
has not yet issued, and currently has no specific plan to issue, any preferred stock; however the Company
provides, as follows, certain information on the characteristics of the types of preferred stock set forth in the
Company’s Articles of Incorporation.
Under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, the Company is authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares ofClass 1 preferred stock, 200,000,000 shares of Class 2 preferred stock, 200,000,000 shares of Class 3 preferredstock and 200,000,000 shares of Class 4 preferred stock. Of these, Class 3 and Class 4 preferred stock areconvertible into common stock, while Class 1 and Class 2 preferred stock are not convertible into common stock.
See “Right of Shareholders of Preferred Stock to Demand Acquisition thereof (Conversion)” below.
Preferred Dividends
Under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, preferred dividends may be paid to shareholders ofpreferred stock on record as of March 31 every year. In addition, interim preferred dividends may be paid toshareholders of the Company’s preferred stock on record as of June 30, September 30 or December 31 of any
year. Dividends on preferred stock are to be paid always in priority to dividends on common stock. The detailed
terms and conditions of each class of preferred stock, including the amount of preferred dividends or preferredinterim dividends, are to be determined by a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors or by Executive
Officer(s) under authorities delegated by a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors prior to the time ofissuance thereof, provided that the annual dividend rate applicable to Class 1 and Class 2 preferred stock may notexceed 15%, and the annual dividend rate applicable to Class 3 and Class 4 preferred stock may not exceed 10%.
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, no payment of any dividend on
preferred stock may be made unless the Company has sufficient Surplus to pay such dividend, and each paymentof a dividend on a preferred stock must be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.
Dividends on the Company’s preferred stock are non-cumulative. In the event that preferred dividends were
paid, and the amount actually paid by the Company in respect of any fiscal year was less than the amount thereof
payable in respect of such fiscal year, preferred shareholders would have no right to seek payment of the
deficient amount as a cumulative preferred dividend in any subsequent fiscal year.
99

Shareholders of the Company’s preferred stock will not be entitled to any further dividends or otherparticipation in or distribution of Surplus.
Voting Rights
Any voting rights attached to the Company’s preferred stock are limited to the extent specifically provided
under the Companies Act, any other applicable laws and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation. Subject to theconditions stated therein, the voting rights of the Company’s preferred stock as provided in the Company’s
Articles of Incorporation are as follows:•

If no resolution to pay a preferred dividend has been adopted by the Board of Directors prior to thedispatch of the convocation notice for the ordinary general meeting of shareholders in respect of any
fiscal year, and if no proposal to pay such preferred dividend was submitted to the relevant ordinary
general meeting of shareholders, then the shareholders of the relevant preferred stock will be entitled tovote at such meeting and all subsequent general meetings of shareholders up to the time when the Boardof Directors or general meeting of shareholders adopts a resolution to pay such preferred dividend; and•If a resolution to pay a preferred dividend has not been adopted at any ordinary general meeting ofshareholders, the shareholders of the relevant preferred stock will be entitled to vote at all subsequent
general meetings of shareholders up to the time when the Board of Directors or general meeting ofshareholders adopts a resolution to pay such preferred dividend.

Liquidation Rights
In the event of the Company’s voluntary or involuntary liquidation, shareholders of the Company’s
preferred stock would be entitled, in preference over shareholders of common stock, to receive such amounts of
the Company’s residual assets as may be determined by a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors or by
Executive Officer(s) under authorities delegated by a resolution of the Board of Directors taking into
consideration the amounts of subscription moneys paid for the respective preferred stock.
Except as described above, shareholders of the Company’s preferred stock would not be entitled to receive a
distribution of residual assets upon liquidation of the Company.
Right of Shareholders of Preferred Stock to Demand Acquisition thereof (Conversion)
Class 3 preferred stock and Class 4 preferred stock are attached with the right to demand that the Company
acquire such shares of preferred stock during a certain period. In the event of the exercise of such right, theCompany shall be required to deliver to the relevant shareholder a certain number of shares of the Company’scommon stock in exchange for the shares of the preferred stock acquired by the Company from such shareholder.
Specific terms of such right, including the period during which the preferred stock would be acquired (a“conversion period”) and the initial acquisition price (a “conversion price”), would be determined by a resolutionof the Company’s Board of Directors or by Executive Officer(s) under authorities delegated by a resolution of theBoard of Directors.
The Company’s Right and Obligation to Acquire Preferred Stock
Upon the occurrence of such event or on such date as may be determined by a resolution of the Company’s
Board of Directors or by Executive Officer(s) under authorities delegated by a resolution of the Board of
Directors prior to the issuance of any of Class 1 preferred stock, Class 2 preferred stock and/or Class 4 preferredstock, the Company shall have the right to acquire all or any part of the relevant shares of preferred stock. In theevent the Company exercises such right, the Company would deliver to the relevant shareholder a certain amountof cash in exchange for the shares of the preferred stock acquired by the Company from such shareholder. The
100

initial acquisition price at which the relevant preferred stock would be acquired by the Company would bedetermined prior to the time of issuance thereof by a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors or by
Executive Officer(s) under authorities delegated by a resolution of the Board of Directors taking into
consideration the amount of subscription moneys paid for the relevant preferred stock.
With respect to Class 3 preferred stock and Class 4 preferred stock, the Company has the obligation toacquire all shares of such preferred stock outstanding on the day immediately following the last day of therelevant conversion period. In such an event, the Company would deliver to the relevant shareholders a certain
number of shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for the shares of the preferred stock acquired by
the Company from them. The number of shares of the Company’s common stock to be delivered to a shareholderof the relevant preferred stock would be calculated by multiplying the number of shares of the preferred stock
held by such shareholder by the amount of the subscription money per share paid for such preferred stock anddividing the resulting amount by the market price of a share of the Company’s common stock at the time.
Pursuant to amendments to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation approved at the Company’s annual
meeting of shareholders held on June 28, 2011, the following feature has been added to the preferred stock
described in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation: The Company must acquire all or any part of shares ofClass 1 preferred stock, Class 2 preferred stock, Class 3 preferred stock and/or Class 4 preferred stock upon theoccurrence of certain events determined by a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors or by Executive
Officer(s) under authorities delegated by a resolution of the Board of Directors (including the event that theCompany’s capital adequacy ratio or other measure of regulatory capital falls below a pre-determined threshold,and/or the event that a supervisory agency (or an equivalent body) determines that a write-down, capital injection
by a public institution or other equivalent action is necessary for the Company) prior to the time of issuance ofthe relevant preferred stock. In such an event, the Company will deliver to the relevant shareholders a certain
number of shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for the shares of the preferred stock acquired by
the Company from them. The number of the Company’s common stock to be delivered to a shareholder of therelevant preferred stock would be determined prior to the issuance of such preferred shares by a resolution of theCompany’s Board of Directors or by Executive Officer(s) considering the subscription price of the preferredshares, the market value of the Company’s common stock and market conditions. An upper limit for the common
stock to be delivered in exchange for the relevant preferred shares may also be set pursuant to such resolution or
determination.
Order of Priority
Class 1 through Class 4 preferred stock shall have the same order of priority in respect of the payment ofpreferred dividends and preferred interim dividends and the distribution of residual assets. All classes ofpreferred stock will be in priority to the Company’s common stock in respect of the payments of dividends andinterim dividends and the distribution of residual assets.
Report of Substantial Shareholdings
The FIEA requires any person who has become, beneficially and solely or jointly, a holder of more than 5%of the total issued shares of a company listed on any Japanese stock exchange to file with the relevant Local
Finance Bureau, within five business days, a report concerning those shareholdings. With certain exceptions, asimilar report must also be filed to reflect any change of 1% or more in the above shareholding or any change inmaterial matters set out in any previously filed reports. Copies of any reports must also be furnished to theCompany. For this purpose, shares issuable to a person upon exercise of stock acquisition rights are taken into
account in determining both the number of shares held by that holder and the Company’s total issued sharecapital.

101

Daily Price Fluctuation Limits under Japanese Stock Exchange Rules
Stock prices on Japanese stock exchanges are determined on a real-time basis by the equilibrium between
bids and offers. These exchanges are order-driven markets without specialists or market makers to guide priceformation. To prevent excessive volatility, these exchange set daily upward and downward price fluctuation
limits for each stock, based on the previous day’s closing price. Although transactions may continue at the
upward or downward limit price if the limit price is reached on a particular trading day, no transactions may takeplace outside these limits. Consequently, an investor wishing to sell at a price above or below the relevant daily
limit may not be able to sell the shares at such price on a particular trading day, or at all.
On June 26, 2013, the closing price of the Company’s shares on the Tokyo Stock Exchange was ¥698 pershare. The following table shows the daily price limit for a stock on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Other daily pricelimits would apply if the per share price of shares of the Company moved to other ranges.
Selected Daily Price Limits
Previous Day’s Closing Price or Special Quote

Equal to or greater thanEqual to or greater thanEqual to or greater thanEqual to or greater thanEqual to or greater than

¥ 100
200
500
700
1,000

Less thanLess thanLess thanLess thanLess thanMaximum Daily Price Movement

¥ 200
500
700
1,000
1,500

¥

50
80
100
150
300

For a history of the trading price of shares of the Company on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, see Item 9.A of
this annual report.
Rights of ADR Holders
The rights of ADR holders, including their rights to corporate governance practices, are governed by the
Deposit Agreement which is an exhibit to this annual report. For a description of the rights of holders of ADSs,
see “Rights of Holders of ADSs” under Item 10.B of our Registration Statement on Form 20-F (FileNo. 1-15270), which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2001. The
information contained in that part of the Registration Statement is incorporated in Item 10.B of this annual reportby reference. For fees and charges that a holder of ADSs may have to pay, see “Description of Securities Other
Than Equity Securities” under Item 12 of this annual report.
C. Material Contracts.
For the two years immediately preceding the date of this annual report, we have not been a party to any
material agreement other than in the ordinary course of business, except as disclosed in Item 6.C of this annual
report.
D. Exchange Controls.
Acquisition of Shares
The Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Law of Japan and its related cabinet orders and ministerial
ordinances (“Foreign Exchange Regulations”) governs certain aspects relating to the acquisition and holding of
securities by “non-residents of Japan” and “foreign investors”, as defined below.
In general, acquisition of shares of stock of a Japanese company listed on any Japanese stock exchange by anon-resident of Japan from a resident of Japan is not subject to any prior notification requirement, but subject to apost reporting requirement by the resident.
If a foreign investor acquires shares of a Japanese company listed on a Japanese stock exchange and as aresult of this acquisition directly or indirectly holds 10% or more of the issued shares of such company, together
102with its existing holdings and those of other parties who have a special relationship with that foreign investor, theforeign investor is, in general, required to report the acquisition to the Minister of Finance and any othercompetent ministers via the Bank of Japan by the 15th day of the immediately following month in which the dateof acquisition falls. In exceptional cases, a prior notification is required in respect of the acquisition.
“Non-residents of Japan” are generally defined as individuals who are not resident in Japan and corporations
whose principal offices are located outside Japan. Branches and other offices of Japanese corporations locatedoutside Japan are considered as non-residents of Japan, and branches and other offices located within Japan of
non-resident corporations are considered as residents of Japan.
“Foreign investors” are generally defined as (i) individuals who are not resident in Japan, (ii) corporations
which are organized under the laws of foreign countries or whose principal offices are located outside Japan, and(iii) corporations of which (a) 50% or more of the voting rights are held directly or indirectly by (i) and/or(ii) above, (b) a majority of officers consists of non-residents of Japan or (c) a majority of officers having thepower of representation consists of non-residents of Japan.
Dividends and Proceeds of Sale
Under the Foreign Exchange Regulations, dividends paid on, and the proceeds of sales in Japan of, shares
held by non-residents of Japan may in general be converted into any foreign currency and repatriated abroad.
Under the terms of the deposit agreement pursuant to which ADSs of the Company will be issued, the depositary
is required, to the extent that in its judgment it can convert yen on a reasonable basis into dollars and transfer the
resulting dollars to the U.S., to convert all cash dividends that it receives in respect of deposited shares into
dollars and to distribute the amount received (after deduction of applicable withholding taxes) to the holders of
ADSs.
E. Taxation.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation
This section describes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning shares or ADSs. It
applies to you only if you are a U.S. holder (as defined below), you acquire your shares or ADSs in an offeringand you hold your shares or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes. This section does not apply to you if you area member of a special class of holders subject to special rules, including:•a dealer in securities,•a trader in securities that elects to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for your securities
holdings,•

a tax-exempt organization,•a life insurance company,•a person liable for alternative minimum tax,•

a person that actually or constructively owns 10% or more of our voting stock,•a person that holds shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging, conversion, integrated orconstructive sale transaction,•a person that purchases or sells shares or ADSs as part of a wash sale for tax purposes, or•a person whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.

This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing andproposed regulations, published rulings and court decisions, all as currently in effect, as well as on the Income103

Tax Convention Between the U.S. and Japan (“Japan-U.S. Tax Treaty”). These laws are subject to change,
possibly on a retroactive basis. In addition, this section is based in part upon the representations of The Bank of
New York Mellon and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement
will be performed in accordance with its terms.
If a partnership holds the shares or ADSs, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally
depend on the status of the partner and the tax treatment of the partnership. A partner in a partnership holding theshares or ADSs should consult its tax advisor with regard to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of aninvestment in the shares or ADSs.
You are a U.S. holder if you are a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs and you are:•a citizen or resident of the U.S.,•a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S. or any political subdivision thereof,•an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source, or•a trust if a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more
U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

You should consult your own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and other tax consequences ofowning and disposing of shares and ADSs in your particular circumstances.
This discussion addresses only U.S. federal income taxation.
In general, and taking into account the earlier assumptions, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, if you hold
ADRs evidencing ADSs, you will be treated as the owner of the shares represented by those ADSs. Exchanges ofshares for ADRs, and ADRs for shares, generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Taxation of Dividends
Under the U.S. federal income tax laws, and subject to the passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”)
rules discussed below, the gross amount of any dividend we pay out of our current or accumulated earnings andprofits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is subject to U.S. federal income taxation. If you area non-corporate U.S. holder, dividends that constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to you at thepreferential rates applicable to long-term capital gains provided that you hold the shares or ADSs for more than
60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meet other holding periodrequirements. Dividends we pay with respect to the shares or ADSs generally will be qualified dividend income.
You must include any Japanese tax withheld from the dividend payment in this gross amount even though you do
not in fact receive it.
The dividend is taxable when you, in the case of shares, or the depositary, in the case of ADSs, receive thedividend, actually or constructively. The dividend will not be eligible for the “dividends-received deduction”
generally allowed to U.S. corporations in respect of dividends received from other U.S. corporations. The amountof the dividend distribution that you must include in your income as a U.S. holder will be the U.S. dollar value of
the Japanese yen payments made, determined at the spot Japanese yen/U.S. dollar rate on the date the dividend
distribution is includible in your income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars.
Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date you
include the dividend payment in income to the date you convert the payment into U.S. dollars will be treated asordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the special tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income.
The gain or loss generally will be income or loss from sources within the U.S. for foreign tax credit limitation
purposes. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of your basis in the shares or
ADSs and thereafter as capital gain. However, we do not expect to calculate earnings and profits in accordancewith United States federal income tax principles. Accordingly, you should expect generally to treat distributions
we make as dividends.
104

Subject to certain limitations, the Japanese tax withheld in accordance with the Japan-U.S. Tax Treaty andpaid over to Japan will be creditable against your U.S. federal income tax liability. Special rules apply indetermining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends that are subject to the preferential tax rates.
To the extent a refund of the tax withheld is available under Japanese law or the Japan-U.S. Tax Treaty, theamount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for credit against your U.S. federal income tax
liability.
For foreign tax credit purposes, dividends will generally be income from sources outside the U.S., and,depending on your circumstances, will generally be “passive income” or “general income” for purposes ofcomputing the foreign tax credit allowable to you.
Taxation of Capital Gains
Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, if you are a U.S. holder and you sell or otherwise dispose of yourshares or ADSs, you will recognize capital gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to thedifference between the U.S. dollar value of the amount that you realize and your tax basis, determined in U.S.
dollars, in your shares or ADSs. Capital gain of a noncorporate U.S. holder is generally taxed at preferential rates
where the property is held for more than one year. The gain or loss will generally be income or loss from sources
within the U.S. for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
PFIC Rules
We do not expect our shares and ADSs to be treated as stock of a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, but this conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and thus may be subject to change.
Moreover, the application of the PFIC rules to a corporation, such as Nomura, that is primarily engaged in an
active business as a securities dealer is not entirely clear.
In general, if you are a U.S. holder, we will be a PFIC with respect to you if for any taxable year in which
you held our ADSs or shares:•

at least 75% of our gross income for the taxable year is passive income, or•at least 50% of the value, determined on the basis of a quarterly average, of our assets is attributable toassets that produce or are held for the production of passive income.

Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents (other than certain rents and royalties
derived in the active conduct of a trade or business), annuities and gains from assets that produce passive income.
If a foreign corporation owns at least 25% by value of the stock of another corporation, the foreign corporation istreated for purposes of the PFIC tests as owning its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation, andas receiving directly its proportionate share of the other corporation’s income.
If we are treated as a PFIC, and you are a U.S. holder that did not make a mark-to-market election, as
described below, you will be subject to special rules with respect to:•

any gain you realize on the sale or other disposition of your shares or ADSs, and•any excess distribution that we make to you (generally, any distributions to you during a single taxable
year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received by you in respect of theshares or ADSs during the three preceding taxable years or, if shorter, your holding period for the sharesor ADSs).

Under these rules:•

the gain or excess distribution will be allocated ratably over your holding period for the shares or ADSs,•

the amount allocated to the taxable year in which you realized the gain or excess distribution will betaxed as ordinary income,105•the amount allocated to each previous year, with certain exceptions, will be taxed at the highest tax ratein effect for that year, and•the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed in respect of the tax
attributable to each such year.

Special rules apply for calculating the amount of the foreign tax credit with respect to excess distributions
by a PFIC.
If you own shares or ADSs in a PFIC that are regularly traded on a qualified exchange, they will be treatedas marketable stock, and you may elect to mark your shares or ADSs to market. If you make this election, youwill not be subject to the PFIC rules described above. Instead, in general, you will include as ordinary income
each year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of your shares or ADSs at the end of the taxable year overyour adjusted basis in your shares or ADSs. These amounts of ordinary income will not be eligible for thefavorable tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income or long-term capital gains. You will also be allowed
to take an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted basis of your shares or ADSs over theirfair market value at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included
income as a result of the mark-to-market election). Your basis in the shares or ADSs will be adjusted to reflect
any such income or loss amounts. We urge you to speak to your tax advisor regarding the availability andadvisability of this election.
Your shares or ADSs will be treated as stock in a PFIC if we were a PFIC at any time during your holding
period in your shares or ADSs, even if we are not currently a PFIC. For purposes of this rule, if you make amark-to-market election with respect to your shares or ADSs, you will be treated as having a new holding period
in your shares or ADSs beginning on the first day of the first taxable year beginning after the last taxable year forwhich the mark-to-market election applies.
In addition, notwithstanding any election you make with regard to the shares or ADSs, dividends that you
receive from us will not constitute qualified dividend income to you if we are a PFIC either in the taxable year ofthe distribution or the preceding taxable year. Dividends that you receive that do not constitute qualified dividend
income are not eligible for taxation at the 15% maximum rate applicable to qualified dividend income. Instead,
you must include the gross amount of any such dividend paid by us out of our accumulated earnings and profits(as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) in your gross income, and it will be subject to tax at rates
applicable to ordinary income.
If you own shares or ADSs during any year that we are a PFIC with respect to you, you are generally
required to file Internal Revenue Service Form 8621.
Japanese Taxation
The following is a summary of the principal Japanese tax consequences to owners of shares of the Company
who are non-resident individuals or non-Japanese corporations (“non-resident shareholder”) without a permanentestablishment in Japan to which the relevant income is attributable. As tax laws are frequently revised, the tax
treatments described in this summary are also subject to changes in the applicable Japanese laws and/or double
taxation conventions occurring in the future, if any. This summary is not exhaustive of all possible tax
considerations which may apply to specific investors under particular circumstances. Potential investors should
satisfy themselves as to•the overall tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs, including
specifically the tax consequences under Japanese law,•

the laws of the jurisdiction of which they are resident, and•any tax treaty between Japan and their country of residence, by consulting with their own tax advisers.
106Generally, a non-resident shareholder is subject to Japanese withholding tax on dividends on the shares paidby the Company. A stock split is not subject to Japanese income or corporation tax, as it is characterized merely
as an increase of number of shares (as opposed to an increase of value of shares) from Japanese tax perspectives.
Conversion of retained earnings or legal reserve (but other than additional paid-in capital, in general) into statedcapital on a non-consolidated basis is not characterized as a deemed dividend for Japanese tax purposes, andtherefore such a conversion does not trigger Japanese withholding taxation (Article 2(16) of the JapaneseCorporation Tax Law and Article 8(1)(xiii) of the Japanese Corporation Tax Law Enforcement Order).
Unless an applicable tax treaty, convention or agreement reducing the maximum rate of withholding tax
applies, the rate of Japanese withholding tax applicable to dividends on listed shares such as those paid by theCompany to non-resident shareholders is currently 7%. This rate is applicable for dividends due and payable onor before December 31, 2013, and on or after January 1, 2014, a 15% rate will apply, except for dividends paid to
any individual shareholder who holds 3% or more of the issued shares for which the applicable rate is 20%(please refer to Article 170 and Article 213(1)(i) of the Japanese Income Tax Law and Article 9-3(1)(i) of theJapanese Special Tax Measures Law including its relevant temporary provision for these withholding rates).
On December 2, 2011, the “Special measures act to secure the financial resources required to implement
policy on restoration after the East Japan Earthquake” (Act No. 117 of 2011) was promulgated and special surtax
measures on income tax were introduced to fund the restoration effort from the earthquake. Income tax andwithholding tax payers will need to pay a surtax, calculated by multiplying the base income tax with 2.1% for
25 years starting from January 1, 2013. As a result, the fractional tax rate increase in the withholding tax on
dividends will be made from January 1, 2013, such as 7.147% applicable from January 1, 2013 to December 31,
2013 and 15.315% applicable thereafter until December 31, 2037, respectively. If a non-resident taxpayer is a
resident of a country that Japan has tax treaty with, as described below, such non-residents will not be subject tothe surtax to the extent that the applicable rate agreed in the tax treaty is lower than the aggregate domestic rate.
Japan has income tax treaties, conventions or agreements whereby the above-mentioned withholding tax
rate is reduced, generally to 15% for portfolio investors, with, among others, Belgium, Canada, Denmark,Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, Spain and Sweden. Under theJapan-U.S. Tax Treaty, the withholding tax rate on dividends is 10% for portfolio investors, provided that they do
not have a permanent establishment in Japan, or if there is a permanent establishment, the shares with respect towhich such dividends are paid are not effectively connected with such permanent establishment, and that they are
qualified U.S. residents eligible to enjoy treaty benefits. It shall be noted that, under the Japan-U.S. Tax Treaty,
withholding tax on dividends to be paid is exempt from Japanese taxation by way of withholding or otherwise forpension funds which are qualified U.S. residents eligible to enjoy treaty benefits unless such dividends arederived from the carrying on of a business, directly or indirectly, by such pension funds (please refer to Article
10(3)(b) of the Japan-U.S. Tax Treaty). In addition to the Japan-U.S. Tax Treaty, Japan currently has income tax
treaties, whereby the withholding tax rate on dividends is also reduced from 15% to 10% for portfolio investors,
with, among others, the U.K., France, Australia, the Netherlands and Switzerland due to the treaty renewals.
Non-resident shareholders who are entitled to a reduced treaty rate of Japanese withholding tax on payment
of dividends on the shares by the Company are required to submit an Application Form for Income Tax
Convention regarding Relief from Japanese Income Tax on Dividends in advance through the Company, which isthe case for ADS holders, or (in cases where the relevant withholding taxpayer for the dividend payment is not
the Company but a financial institution in Japan) through the financial institution, to the relevant tax authority
before payment of dividends. Non-resident shareholders who do not submit an application in advance will beentitled to claim the refund of withholding taxes withheld in excess of the rate of an applicable tax treaty fromthe relevant Japanese tax authority. For Japanese tax purpose, the treaty rate normally applies superseding the tax
rate under the domestic law. However, due to the so-called “preservation doctrine” under Article 3-2 of theSpecial Measures Law for the Income Tax Law, Corporation Tax Law and Local Taxes Law with respect to the
Implementation of Tax Treaties, if the tax rate under the domestic tax law is lower than that promulgated under
the applicable income tax treaty, then the domestic tax rate is still applicable. Consequently, if the domestic tax
rate still applies, no treaty application is required to be filed.
107Gains derived from the sale of shares outside Japan by a non-resident shareholder without a permanentestablishment in Japan as a portfolio investor, are, in general, not subject to Japanese income or corporation
taxes.
Japanese inheritance and gift taxes at progressive rates may be payable by an individual who has acquired
shares as a legatee, heir or donee, even if the individual is not a Japanese resident.
You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the Japanese tax consequences of the acquisition,
ownership and disposition of the shares and ADSs in your particular circumstances.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents.
Not applicable.
G. Statement by Experts.
Not applicable.
H. Documents on Display.
The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, in
accordance therewith, the Company will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission annual reports on
Form 20-F within four months of the Company’s fiscal year-end and other reports and information on Form 6-K.
These reports and other information can be inspected at the public reference room at the Securities and Exchange
Commission at 100 F Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can also obtain copies of such material by mailfrom the public reference room of the Securities and Exchange Commission at prescribed fees. You may obtain
information on the operation of the Securities and Exchange Commission public reference room by calling the
Securities and Exchange Commission in the U.S. at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can also access the documents filed
via the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system on the SEC’s website (http://www.sec.gov).
I. Subsidiary Information.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Risk Management
The business activities of the Nomura Group are exposed to various risks such as market risk, credit risk,
operational risk and other risks caused by external factors. We have established a risk management framework toprovide comprehensive controls, monitoring and reporting of these risks in order to maintain financial soundness
and the Company’s corporate values.
Global Risk Management Structure
Governance
The Board of Directors has established the “Structure for Ensuring Appropriate Business of Nomura
Holdings, Inc.” as the Company’s basic principle and set up a framework for the management of risk of loss
based on this. In addition, they are continuously making efforts to improve, strengthen and build up our risk
management capabilities under this framework. Besides this, the Group Integrated Risk Management Committee(“GIRMC”), upon delegation of the EMB, has established the Integrated Risk Management Policy, describing theoverall risk management framework including the fundamental principles concerning risk management andorganization and this is under continuous improvement.
108

Basic Principles of Risk Management
The Nomura Group defines risks as i.) potential erosion of the Nomura Group’s capital base due to
unexpected losses from business operations, ii.) potential lack of access to funds due to deterioration of the
Nomura Group’s creditworthiness or deterioration in market conditions, or iii.) potential failure of revenues tocover expenses due to deterioration of earnings environment or deterioration of efficiency or effectiveness ofbusiness operations.
It is a fundamental principle that all Directors, Executive Managing Directors, Senior Managing Directors,
Corporate Auditors and employees of the Nomura Group shall regard themselves as principals of risk
management and appropriately manage risks arising in the course of day-to-day business operations. At the sametime, the Nomura Group practices prudent risk management at an individual entity level within the group andalso identifies, evaluates and appropriately manages risks within the business units, risk management and internal
audit, respectively.
Fundamental Policy of Risk Management
Our fundamental policy concerning risk management is to control risks arising in the course of business
operations to the confines of the Company’s risk appetite, which is clearly established based on risk tolerance inline with group-wide business strategy, business targets, management strength and capital base. We endeavor toembed this appetite into actual business operations.
Our risk appetite consists of quantitative and qualitative factors. Targets are set for quantitative factors suchas capital adequacy, liquidity and profitability. Targets also set for qualitative factors such as Zero Tolerance
Risk, which is the risk that Nomura shall tolerate to no extent whatsoever, and for Minimum Tolerance Risk,
which is the risk that we may tolerate to a limited extent in consideration of profit potential, risk mitigation
methods, monitoring capability and other factors, respectively.
We endeavor to measure risks using quantitative methods to the greatest extent possible and to continually
improve our risk measurement methods. We use economic capital, for the risks measured by quantitative
methods collectively and use this as the principal reference for assessment of capital adequacy, capital allocation
and risk management. When evaluating risks by quantitative methods, we conduct stress testing as acomplementary measure to analyze and evaluate the potential impact of each type of risk on our capital base.

109

Risk Management Organizations
The organizational structure and core bodies tasked with risk management in the Nomura Group are shownin the following chart.
Board of Directors

Executive Management Board

Internal Controls Committee

Group Integrated Risk
Management Committee* Market Risk Management* Credit Risk Management* Operational Risk Management* Other (1)CROGroup Internal Audit

CFO

Risk Management Departments
Audit
MonitorCommunicate

Individual Business Units(1) Other includes other risks such as Country Risk, System Risk, Liquidity Risk and Business Risk. Prudent
risk controls involve identifying, evaluating and appropriately managing risks in each business unit, risk
management departments and internal audit departments within the Nomura Group. Any issues that could
potentially cause a significant impact on the management of the Nomura Group will be reported to senior
management and the GIRMC by the relevant risk management departments in charge of monitoring therelevant risk.
Executive Management Board
The EMB deliberates on and determines management strategy, allocation of management resources andimportant management matters of the Nomura Group by promoting the effective use of management resourcesand execution of business with the unified intent of contributing to the increase in shareholders’ value. Key
responsibilities of the EMB are as follows:•

Resource Allocation—At the beginning of each financial year, the EMB determines the allocation ofmanagement resources and financial resources such as economic capital and unsecured funding to thebusiness units and establishes usage limits which are monitored on a daily basis;•

Business Plan—At the beginning of each financial year, the EMB approves the business plan andbudget of the Nomura Group. Introduction of significant new businesses, changes to business plans, thebudget and the allocation of management resources during the year are also discussed by the EMB; and•Reporting—The EMB reports to the Board of Directors on the status of discussions at the EMB on aquarterly basis.

110Group Integrated Risk Management Committee
Upon delegation by the EMB, the GIRMC deliberates on and determines important matters concerning
integrated risk management of the Nomura to ensure the sound and effective management of the business. The
GIRMC is a core organization for group-wide risk management and establishes the risk appetite of the Nomura
Group and the framework of integrated risk management in accordance with our risk appetite. The key
responsibilities of the GIRMC are as follows:•

Risk Appetite—The GIRMC establishes the risk appetite of the Nomura Group and provides aframework for integrated risk management in accordance with this risk appetite;•

Oversight—The GIRMC supervises risk management in the Nomura Group by establishing andoperating group wide risk control processes. These processes consist of identification of specific risks,
evaluation and monitoring of these risks and implementation of appropriate risk management measuresand reporting; and•Reporting—The GIRMC reports the status of key risk management issues to the Board of Directors andthe EMB on a quarterly basis.

Chief Risk Officer
The Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) is responsible for supervising the Risk Management Department andmaintaining the effectiveness of the risk management framework independently from the business units within
the Nomura Group. The CRO not only regularly reports on the status of the Nomura Group’s risk management to
the GIRMC, but also reports to and seeks the approval of the GIRMC on measures required for risk management.
Chief Financial Officer
The CFO has operational authority and responsibility over our liquidity management. Our liquidity risk
management policy is based on risk appetite which the GIRMC formulates. Our primary objective for liquidity
risk management is to ensure continuous liquidity across market cycles and periods of stress, and to ensure that
all funding requirements and unsecured debt obligations that fall due within one year can be met without
additional unsecured funding or forced liquidation of trading assets.
Risk Management Departments
Our Risk Management Departments are defined collectively as the Group Risk Management Department
and departments or units in charge of risk management established independently from business units within the
Nomura Group. The Risk Management Departments are responsible for establishing and operating of risk
management processes, establishing and enforcing risk management policies and regulations, verifying theeffectiveness of risk management methods, gathering reports from Nomura Group entities, reporting to
Executive/Senior Managing Directors and the GIRMC and others and also reporting to regulatory bodies andhandling of regulatory applications concerning risk management methods and other items. Important risk
management issues are closely communicated between members of the Risk Management Departments and theCRO. The CRO or Deputy CRO regularly attend the EMB and GIRMC meetings to report specific risk issues.

111

Classification and Definition of Risk
The Nomura Group classifies and defines risks as follows and has established departments or units tomanage each risk type.
Risk Category

Summary Description

Market Risk

Risk of losses arising from fluctuations in values of financial assets and debts (including
off-balance sheet items) due to fluctuations in market risk factors (interest rates, foreignexchange rates, prices of securities and others).

Credit Risk

Risk of losses arising from decrease or disappearance of asset values (including offbalance sheet items) due to deterioration in creditworthiness or default of an obligor orcounterparty.

Country Risk

Risk brought about by a country’s political, economic, legal, conventional, religious orother characteristics inherent to the country or risk of losses arising from changes in acountry’s situation due to a change of regime, fall in predictability of governmental
measures, economic downturn or social turmoil.

Operational Risk

Risk of losses arising from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems
or external events.

System Risk

Within Operational Risk, risk of losses due to system defects including, without
limitation, computer crash or malfunction, or risk of losses due to unauthorized use ofcomputers.

Liquidity Risk

Risk of losses arising from difficulty in securing the necessary funding or from asignificantly higher cost of funding than normal levels due to deterioration of the
Nomura Group’s creditworthiness or deterioration in market conditions.

Business Risk

Risk of failure of revenues to cover costs due to deterioration of the earnings
environment or deterioration of the efficiency or effectiveness of business operations.

Market Risk
Market risk refers to the potential loss from fluctuations in the value of assets and liabilities due tofluctuations in market factors, e.g. interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, credit spreads, indices,volatilities, correlations or other market factors. This type of risk primarily impacts our trading activities.
Effective management of this risk requires the ability to analyze a complex and constantly changing global
market environment, identify problematic trends and ensure that appropriate action is taken in a timely manner.
Nomura uses a variety of complementary tools to measure, model and aggregate market risk. Our principal
statistical measurement tool to assess and monitor market risk on an ongoing basis is Value at Risk (“VaR”).
Limits on VaR are set in line with the Nomura Group’s risk appetite as expressed through economic capital. In
addition to VaR, we use stress testing and sensitivity analysis to measure and analyze our market risk.
Sensitivities are measures used to show the potential changes to a portfolio due to standard moves in market risk
factors.They are specific to each asset class and cannot usually be aggregated across risk factors. Market risk ismonitored against a set of approved limits, with daily reports and other management information provided to thebusiness units and senior management.
Value at Risk
VaR is a measure of the potential loss in the value of our trading positions due to adverse movements inmarkets over a defined time horizon with a specified confidence level. Market risks that are incorporated in the
VaR model include equity prices, interest rates, credit, foreign exchange rates, and commodities with associatedvolatilities and correlations.
112

VaR Methodology Assumptions
Nomura uses a single VaR model which has been implemented globally in order to determine the total
trading VaR for the Nomura Group.
Nomura’s VaR methodology uses historical simulation to estimate potential profit or loss. Historical market
moves are repeatedly applied to our current exposure, forming a distribution of simulated portfolio returns. From
this distribution the required potential losses can be estimated at required confidence levels or probabilities.
Nomura uses the same VaR model for both internal risk management purposes and for regulatory reportingof our consolidated VaR to the Financial Services Agency of Japan. For internal risk management purposes, VaR
is calculated across the Nomura Group at a 99% confidence level and using a 1-day time horizon. For regulatory
reporting purposes, we use the same confidence level but a 10-day time horizon, calculated using actual 10-day
historical market moves.
For internal information purposes, Nomura also calculates a “1% VaR” which represents the potential
profits from the same distribution. Differences between 99% and 1% measures can be used to demonstrate thatmarkets do not always follow a simple statistical probability model. Additionally, Nomura calculates othermeasures used to complement VaR under regulation known as “Basel 2.5”. One of these, Stressed-VaR(“SVAR”) is calibrated on a one-year window from a period of financial stress. All VaR and SVaR numbers arecalculated within the same system using equivalent assumptions.
The VaR model uses a default historical time window of two years (520 business days). For risk
management and backtesting (see below), Nomura uses a weighted VaR. For the calculation of VaR, theprobability weight assigned to each P&L in the historical simulation scenarios depends on when it occurred. The
older the observation, the lower the weight. An exponential weighting scheme is used with the attenuation
coefficient set to 0.995. This choice of parameter implies a weighted average of the data set is 159 business days
(just over 7 months).
The SVaR calculation uses one year of market data from a period of financial stress. The one-year window
is calibrated to be the one with the largest SVaR, given our current portfolio. The historical data used for SVaR is
not exponentially weighted.
Given a set of historical market moves, Nomura’s VaR model calculates revenues impacts for current
portfolio using a combination of sensitivities (“greeks”) revaluation, full and partial revaluation. Material basis
risks are captured either by using different time series (e.g., stock vs. ADR) or by using sensitivities and basistime series (e.g., Bond / Credit Default Swap (“CDS”) credit spread basis).
Nomura’s VaR model uses time series for each individual underlying, whenever available. Approximately
25,000 time series are currently maintained in the Nomura Group’s market database. Time series are generally
available for all assets but where a complete time series (i.e., 520 business days) cannot be found for a specificunderlying, the VaR model will follow a ‘proxy logic’ to map the exposure to an appropriate time series (forexample, this would be the case for an option on a recently issued stock). The level of proxying taking place inthe VaR model is carefully monitored through internal risk management processes and there is a continual effort
to source new time series to use in the VaR calculation.
Changes in VaR Models and Assumptions
Nomura is committed to continuous improvement of our risk modeling and to maintaining risk modelingthat is in line with best practices in our industry.
We have documented policies in place approved by the GIRMC which define the process and validation
procedures required in order to implement changes to our VaR and other risk models. The Global Risk
113

Methodology Group (“GRMG”) within our Risk Management Division has primary responsibility for theongoing refinement and improvement of our risk models and methodologies. All model changes arecommunicated by the GRMG to the Global Model Validation Group (“MVG”) and any significant changes are
initially independently reviewed and validated by MVG before being implemented.
The nature of the processes required to be performed by GRMG to support a model change and the level ofvalidation required by MVG depends on the significance of the model change. For certain significant changes,
backtesting of the new model, parallel running of both models and stress-testing of the new model are required
prior to implementation.
Under delegated authority from the Global Risk Management Committee (“GRMC”) that is delegation by
GIRMC for the purpose of deliberating on or determining important matters concerning market, credit risk or
reputational risk management of the Nomura Group and assuring the sound and effective management of thebusinesses, model changes are also formally approved by the Global Risk Analytics Committee (“GRAC”) if
certain materiality thresholds defined by the Nomura Group are met. The GRAC is formed of senior risk
managers within Nomura including the CRO and the CFO and has delegated authority from the GRMC toapprove such changes.
Details of all significant model changes are reported to the GRMC on a quarterly basis or more frequently,
if required.
We are required to formally report significant changes in our VaR and other models to the FSA. A
significant change is defined internally as any change resulting in a change of more than 10% of Nomura’s
consolidated group regulatory capital. Insignificant changes are also informally communicated to the FSA on aregular basis.
VaR Backtesting
The performance of Nomura’s VaR model is constantly monitored to ensure that it remains fit for purpose.
The main approach for validating VaR is to compare 1-day P&L with the corresponding VaR estimate. With a
99% VaR measure, one expects 2-3 exceptions (i.e. loss is larger than VaR) a year. We backtest the VaR modelat the Nomura Group level as well as at a number of lower levels, and the backtesting results are reviewed on amonthly basis by the Nomura’s risk management function.
No backtesting exceptions were experienced at the Nomura Group level for the year ending March 31, 2013.
Limitations and Advantages of VaR
The main advantage of VaR as a risk measure is that it is able to aggregate risk from different asset classes(in contrast with other risk measures sensitivities that cannot be easily aggregated directly). The risk fromdifferent divisions of the Group can therefore easily be compared and aggregated using VaR.
As a risk measure, however, VaR has well documented limitations. One of the main disadvantages with
VaR is that it is a backward looking risk measure. Using historical market moves to infer future P&L for a firm,means that we assume that only events that have actually happened are relevant to analyse the risk of a portfolio.
Moreover, VaR only gives an estimate of the loss at a stated (99th) percentile (i.e. in one out of 100 days theloss will be greater than 1-day VaR), but not what magnitude of loss that can take place whenever the loss does
exceed VaR.
VaR as a risk measure is most appropriate for liquid markets and may understate the financial impact ofsevere events for which there is no historical precedent on where market liquidity may not be reliable. In
particular, historical correlations can break down in extreme markets leading to unexpected relative market
moves. This may make positions that off-set each other in VaR modeling move in the same direction thusincrease losses.
114

We are aware of the limitations of the Nomura Group’s VaR model and use VaR only as one component of
a diverse risk management process. Other metrics to supplement VaR include stress testing and sensitivity
analysis.
The following tables show our VaR as of each of the dates indicated for substantially all of our trading
positions:
Billions of yen
Mar. 30, Apr. 30, May 31, Jun. 29, Jul. 31, Aug. 31, Sep. 28, Oct. 31, Nov. 30, Dec. 31, Jan. 31, Feb. 28, Mar. 29,
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2013

Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 1.37 ¥ 1.31 ¥ 1.06 ¥ 1.20 ¥ 1.06 ¥ 5.12 ¥ 0.99 ¥ 1.07 ¥ 1.46 ¥ 2.43 ¥ 1.80 ¥ 1.63 ¥ 1.26
Interest Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.53
4.45
5.38
5.70 5.64
5.97
6.59
6.11
6.97
6.41 6.26
5.28
5.00
Foreign Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.52
2.84
2.40
1.70 1.85
2.05
1.88
2.34
3.40
2.14 1.69
1.96
1.87
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less:Diversification Benefit . . . .

10.42

8.59

8.84

8.60

8.54

13.14

9.45

9.51

(3.20) (3.10) (3.66) (3.20) (3.16) (7.64) (2.30) (2.81)

11.82

10.98

9.75

8.86

8.14

(4.85) (3.81) (3.44) (2.84)(3.05)

VaR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 7.22 ¥ 5.49 ¥ 5.18 ¥ 5.40 ¥ 5.38 ¥ 5.50 ¥ 7.15 ¥ 6.70 ¥ 6.97 ¥ 7.16 ¥ 6.31 ¥ 6.03 ¥ 5.09

VaR
(maximum)(average)(minimum)¥8.66 : October 17, 20126.11 : Average for the period from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 20134.33 : May 4, 2012
Billions of yen
Mar. 31, Apr. 29, May 31, Jun. 30, Jul. 29, Aug. 31, Sep. 30, Oct. 31, Nov. 30, Dec. 30, Jan. 31, Feb. 29, Mar. 30,
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2012
2012
2012

Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 1.78 ¥ 1.88 ¥ 1.64 ¥ 1.59 ¥ 1.68 ¥ 2.06 ¥ 1.88 ¥ 2.39 ¥ 1.86 ¥ 1.46 ¥ 1.80 ¥ 1.90 ¥ 1.37
Interest Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.08
4.41
5.13
4.31
5.18 3.37
4.03
6.29
5.28
5.03
4.28 4.83
6.53
Foreign Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.53
3.93
4.13
3.83
3.68 3.15
2.84
3.18
3.14
3.54
4.06 3.13
2.52
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less:Diversification Benefit . . . .

10.40

10.21

10.91

9.72

10.54

8.58

8.75

11.86

10.29

10.03

10.15

9.86

10.42

(4.12)(4.13) (3.80) (3.72) (3.69) (3.60) (3.59) (3.71) (3.68) (3.63) (3.73) (2.50)(3.20)

VaR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 6.28 ¥ 6.08 ¥ 7.11 ¥ 6.01 ¥ 6.85 ¥ 4.99 ¥ 5.16 ¥ 8.15 ¥ 6.60 ¥ 6.40 ¥ 6.42 ¥ 7.35 ¥ 7.22

VaR
(maximum)(average)(minimum)¥9.72 : October 26, 2011
6.54 : Average for the period from April 1, 2011 to March 31, 20124.92 : September 15, 2011

Overall VaR has decreased since March 30, 2012. VaR relating to interest rate risk decreased from
¥6.53 billion at the end of March 2012 to ¥5.00 billion at the end of March 2013 due to lower outright interest
rate risk being taken within the Nomura Group. VaR relating to foreign exchange risk decreased from ¥2.52
billion at the end of March 2012 to ¥1.87 billion at the end of March 2013 mainly due to lower levels of FX risk
being taken. VaR relating to equity risk decreased slightly from ¥1.37 billion at the end of March 2012 to ¥1.26
billion at the end of March 2013.
During the year ended March 31, 2012, VaR relating to equity risk decreased from ¥1.78 billion at the endof March 2011 to ¥1.37 billion at the end of March 2012 mainly due to reductions in equity related volatility.
VaR relating to interest rate risk decreased from ¥4.08 billion at the end of March 2011 to ¥6.53 billion at the endof March 2012 mainly due to increased interest rate risk volatility. VaR relating to foreign exchange risk
decreased from ¥4.53 billion at the end of March 2011 to ¥2.52 billion at the end of March 2011 mainly due toreductions in foreign exchange volatility.

115

Other Controls
In some business units or portfolios we use additional controls to control or limit risk taking activity. This
may include the requirement for business units to fulfill additional conditions and/or seek additional approvals
from senior management committees before the execution of certain types of transactions.
Stress Testing
The Nomura Group conducts market risk stress testing since VaR and sensitivity analysis have limited
ability to capture all portfolio risks or tail risks, including non-linear behaviors. Stress testing for market risk isconducted daily and weekly, using various scenarios based upon features of trading strategies. We conduct stresstesting not only at each desk level, but also at the Nomura Group level with a set of common global scenarios inorder to capture the impact on the whole Group of market fluctuations.
Model Reviews
Models are used within the Nomura Group for valuation and risk management of trading positions, financial
reporting, and regulatory and internal capital calculations. The Global Model Validation Group (“MVG”)
validates the appropriateness and consistency of these models, functioning independently to those who design
and build models. As part of this process, the MVG analyzes a number of factors to assess a model’s suitability
and to quantify model risk through model reserves and capital adjustments.
Non-Trading Risk
A major market risk in our non-trading portfolio relates to equity investments held for operating purposes
which we hold on a long-term basis. Our non-trading portfolio is exposed mainly to volatility in the Japanesestock market. One method that can estimate the market risk in the portfolio is to analyze market sensitivity basedon changes in the TOPIX, which is a leading index of prices of stocks on the First Section of the Tokyo Stock
Exchange.
We use regression analysis covering the previous 90 days which tracks and compares fluctuations in the
TOPIX and the market value of our equity investments held for operating purposes. Our simulation indicates thatfor each 10% change in the TOPIX, the market value of our operating equity investments held for operating
purposes can be expected to change by ¥11,951 million at the end of March 2012 and ¥15,327 million at the endof March 2013. The TOPIX closed at 854.35 points at the end of March 2012 and at 1,034.71 points at the end of
March 2013. This simulation analyzes data for our entire portfolio of equity investments held for operating
purposes. Therefore, it is very important to note that the actual results differ from our expectations because of
price fluctuations of individual equities.
Credit Risk
The Nomura Group defines credit risk as risk of losses arising from decrease or disappearance of asset
values (including off-balance sheet items) due to deterioration in creditworthiness or default of an obligor.
For controlling credit risk appropriately, the Nomura Group has set out basic principles in its Credit Risk
Management Policy, a basic policy concerning credit risk management, which are important to meet the various
needs of our clients whilst taking appropriate risks and ensuring sufficient returns to improve our corporate
values. Under these basic principles, we have established a robust and comprehensive credit risk management
framework.
The Nomura Group has been applying the Foundation Internal Rating Based Approach in calculating Credit
Risk Weighted Asset for regulatory capital calculation since the end of March 2011. However, the Standardized
Approach is applied to certain business units or asset types, which are considered immaterial to the calculation of
credit risk weighted assets.
116

Credit Risk Management Framework
Under the credit risk management framework, the GIRMC, upon delegation by the EMB, deliberates on anddetermines important matters concerning integrated risk management of the Nomura Group and accordingly has
established important principles concerning credit risk management as described in the Credit Risk Management
Policy and other documents. Also, GRMC deliberates on and determines important matters concerning credit risk
management of the Nomura Group based on strategic risk allocation and risk appetite of the Nomura Group as
determined by the GIRMC. Subject matters for the GRMC include discussion of significant transactions that
require consideration for its risk management framework.
The Nomura Group has established an organizational structure with an appropriate system of check-andbalances under the CRO. The Credit Planning Unit is responsible for planning or implementation of amending,revising or abolishing Internal Rating Systems, including development, oversight and continuous revising of theInternal Rating Model.
The Credit Department, which is independent from the business units, conducts credit analysis, internalrating assignment, monitoring of credit risk profiles including credit concentration risk and others. Also, theCredit Risk Control Unit (“CRCU”), also independent from the business units and Credit Department, is
responsible for monitoring operations, validation and others items for the Internal Rating System. Additionally,
the Internal Audit Department audits the adequacy of credit risk management independently from thesedepartments.
Method of Credit Risk Management
Internal Rating System
The Nomura Group has established an Internal Rating System to be a unified, exhaustive and objective
framework to evaluate credit risk with reasonable manner. Internal Ratings consist of Obligor Ratings, which
represent an assessment of an Obligor’s creditworthiness, Facility Ratings, which represent an assessment ofpotential unrecoverable loss for a facility in default and Specialised Lending (“SL”) Rating, which represents theassessment of probability of default of a given SL Transactions. Internal Ratings are classified into 20 grades,
which consist of 17 non-default grades and 3 default grades based on creditworthiness.
Obligor Ratings are assigned in principle to obligors which fall into the scope of the credit risk-weighted
assets calculation. In order to appropriately reflect the creditworthiness of obligors, Obligor Ratings are not only
reviewed periodically at least once a year, but also are reviewed as soon as any significant change in thecreditworthiness of the Obligor is identified. The Credit Department, which is functionally independent from thebusiness units, is responsible for assigning Internal Ratings in order to ensure the sound process of rating
assignment.
SL Ratings are assigned to each SL transaction and mapped to Slotting Criteria. Frequency and process of
SL ratings reviews are conducted in almost the same manner with Obligor Ratings.
The CRCU, functionally independent from business units and the Credit Department, is responsible forvalidating the appropriateness of the Internal Rating System at least once a year. In addition, the Internal Audit,
independent from all the divisions and business units mentioned above, is responsible for auditing theappropriateness of the overall Internal Rating System, as part of their review of credit risk management.
Management of Individual Credit Exposures
The Nomura Group’s main type of credit risk assets are credit exposure arising in derivatives transactions or
securities financing transactions (“derivatives” in this section) with counterparties.

117

Credit exposures against counterparties are managed by means of setting Credit Limits based upon credit
analysis of individual obligors. For ongoing risk monitoring, Credit Limits are managed through the daily
calculation of potential credit exposures up to maturity, as well as monitoring the actual creditworthiness of
obligors with adequate frequency, based upon which Obligor Ratings and Credit Limits are updated.
The exposure calculation model used for counterparty credit risk management, i.e., credit limit monitoring,has also been used for the IMM based exposure calculation for regulatory capital reporting purposes since theend of December 2012.
Credit Risk Mitigation Techniques
Nomura enters into International Swap and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) master agreements orequivalent agreements (called “Master Netting Agreements”) with many of its derivatives counterparties. Master
Netting Agreements provide protection to reduce losses potentially incurred by a counterparty default.
In addition, to reduce losses potentially incurred by a counterparty default, Nomura requires collateral tomitigate exposure, principally cash or highly liquid bonds, including U.S. and Japanese government securities,
when necessary.
Scope of Credit Risk Management
The scope of credit risk management includes counterparty trading and various debt or equity instruments
including loans, private equity investments, fund investments, investment securities and any other as deemednecessary from a credit risk management perspective.
Integrated Management
We evaluate credit risk not only by obligor, but also by obligor group where it is appropriate that their credit
risk should be evaluated collectively.
We evaluate credit risk by “obligor groups” (i.e., by counterparty groups) when significant legal or
economic relationships exist between counterparties which mitigate or increase our credit risk when compared tothese individual counterparties if considered separately. Such relationships may exist through one counterparty
owning a controlling financial interest in another, significant financing relationships existing between or among
counterparties or if there are other indicators of significant financial interdependence between counterparties.
Credit Risk Reporting
The global risk management unit is responsible for monitoring, evaluating and analyzing credit risk and forreporting the status of credit risk to the CRO and other Senior Managing Director(s) in charge of risk
management and the GIRMC with appropriate frequency.
Credit Risk Measurement
Credit risk is quantitatively-measured by a globally unified methodology. Credit risk is properly measured
to reflect the effect of collateral or a guarantee.
Credit Risk to Counterparties in Derivatives Transactions
We measure our credit risk to counterparties in derivatives transactions as the sum of actual current
exposure evaluated daily at its fair value, plus potential exposure until maturity of such transactions. All
derivative credit limits are controlled through the risk management departments.
118

As we mentioned previously, we enter into Master Netting Agreements with many of our derivative
counterparties. Master Netting Agreements provide protection to reduce our risks of counterparty default and, insome cases, offset our consolidated balance sheet exposure with the same counterparty and provide a moremeaningful presentation of our balance sheet credit exposure. In addition, to reduce default risk, we require
collateral, principally cash or highly liquid bonds, including U.S. and Japanese government securities whennecessary.
The credit exposures in our trading-related derivatives as of March 31, 2013 are summarized in the tablebelow, showing as the fair value by counterparty credit rating and by remaining contract. The credit ratings areinternally determined by our Credit Department.

Credit Rating

Less than
1 YearBillions of yen
Years to Maturity
Cross1 to 3
3 to 5 5 to 7 More than Maturity
Total
Collateral Replacement
Years
Years Years 7 Years Netting(1) Fair Value Obtained
Cost
(a)
(b)
(a)-(b)AAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 15 ¥ 20 ¥AA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
137
193
A ....................
423
574
BBB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
89
105
BB and lower . . . . . . . . . . .
69
54
Other(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
63
69

¥

78
364
1,446
315
431
220

¥ (102) ¥ 57
(948)
129
(2,661)
645
(522)
192
(451)
191
(442)
234

¥ 18
44
108
113
274
20

860
2

2,854
—

(5,126)
(242)

1,448
443

577
6

871
437

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥1,243 ¥1,239 ¥1,061 ¥862

¥2,854¥(5,368) ¥1,891¥583¥1,308Sub-total . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Listed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

796
447

1,015
224

31 ¥ 15230 153488 375
127
78
63
25
110 214
1,049
12

¥

39
85
537
79
(83)
214

(1) This item represents netting of payable balances with receivable balances for the same counterparty acrossmaturity band categories. Receivable and payable balances with the same counterparty in the same maturity
category, however, are net within the maturity category. Cash collateral netting against net derivatives inaccordance with ASC 210-20 “Balance Sheet—Offsetting” is also included.
(2) “Other” comprises unrated counterparties and certain portfolio level valuation adjustments not allocated to
specific counterparties.
Exposure to certain European peripheral countries
During 2012 and continuing into 2013, the creditworthiness of several peripheral countries within theEurozone such as Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal and Spain (“GIIPS” countries) has declined due to economic
and fiscal weaknesses.
The worsening of financial, economic and structural issues in the GIIPS countries have adversely influenced
major global financial markets. A sustained market/economic downturn can adversely affect our business andcan result in substantial losses.

119

120

113
98
15
7
6
0
74
74
0
¥220
192
28

Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign(9) . . . . . . . . .

Portugal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign(9) . . . . . . . . .

Spain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign(9) . . . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign(9) . . . . . . . . .

2
2
0
25
13
12

¥

Ireland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign(9) . . . . . . . . .

Greece . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign(9) . . . . . . . . .

4

¥ 24
—
24

28
—
28

(7)
—
(7)

4

—

(0)
—
(0)

¥(177)
(141)
(36)

(57)
(17)
(40)

(2)
(13)
11

(115)
(110)
(5)

(3)
(1)
(3)

0

0

0

¥
—

0
—

¥

3
3

—

¥

3

—

3

—
—
—

—
—
—

—
—
—

¥—
—
—

56
25
31

1
1
0

9
7
2

¥ 80
39
41

13
6
8

0
—
0

¥

¥

6

6

7
0
7

—

0
—
0

1
0
1

0
—
0

¥ 0
—
0

¥157
91
66

67
62
4

(3)
(6)
4

59
13
46

23
13
10

¥ 11
9
3

¥

2

2

2
—
2

—

—
—
—

—
—
—

—
—
—

¥—
—
—

¥158
91
68

68
62
6

(3)
(6)
4

59
13
46

23
13
10

¥ 11
9
3

¥ 71
66
5

3
1
1

4
2
2

64
63
1

0
0
0

¥ 0
—
0

¥ 88
25
63

65
61
4

(6)
(8)
2

(6)
(50)
44

23
13
10

¥ 11
9
2

Net inventory exposures
Equity andcreditderivatives
Derivative
Total
referencing
contracts with
Securities
gross
Total
Total
Debt
EquityGIIPS
GIIPS
financingfunded Unfunded
gross
Less:
net
securities(1) securities(2) underlyings(3) Loans(4) counterparties(5) transactions(6) exposure exposure(7) exposure Hedges(8) exposure

March 31, 2013
Net counterparty exposures

Billions of yen

The table below presents information regarding this exposure as at March 31, 2013 as measured in accordance with our internal risk management
policies. Country risk exposure under these policies is reported based on the location of the counterparty, issuer or underlier’s assets.

(1) Fair value amounts of long and short debt securities by GIIPS issuers and also includes GIIPS collateralwith a fair value of ¥ nil billion used in open repo-to-maturity transactions.
(2) Fair value amounts of long and short equity securities by GIIPS issuers.
(3) Net derivatives entered into for market-making and trading purposes which reference GIIPS underlyings andincludes both single-name credit default swaps (“CDS”) and other credit derivatives referencing baskets ofreference assets, indices or other multiple underlyings. Amounts disclosed are calculated based on notionalamounts of the derivatives assuming zero recovery as adjusted for fair value movements.
Where derivative contracts cover multiple underlyings, including one or more GIIPS countries or both
sovereign and non-sovereign underlyings in these countries, the relevant derivatives are disaggregated into
their constituent single names for reporting in the table. Exposure for each single name is calculated as thechange in mark to market of the product, based on an internally developed model, given the instantaneous
default of the relevant reference credit and assuming zero recovery. No specific assumptions are maderegarding the order of defaults or collateral coverage. This methodology results in an accurate measure of
exposure for each relevant single name but has certain limitations when amounts are aggregated acrossnumerous reference credits for tranched products. For junior tranches, this approach may result in disclosureof aggregate exposure amounts in excess of the maximum possible impact to Nomura under the relevant
derivative contract. Conversely, for more senior tranches, our actual exposure may be higher than theaggregate amounts disclosed in the table in the event of a large number of simultaneous defaults.
(4) Fair value amounts of loans to GIIPS counterparties.
(5) Derivatives with GIIPS counterparties which are shown net by counterparty and after deduction of cash
collateral received of ¥365.2 billion.
(6) Fair value amounts of repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending transactions when are
shown net by counterparty and after deduction of securities collateral and cash margin received of¥689.6 billion.
(7) Notional amount of unfunded loan commitments with GIIPS borrowers. These commitments are generally
extended either for relationship purposes or as part of our leverage and acquisition finance activities and will
expire by June 1, 2016. The borrowers are typically not permitted to draw down on the facilities if a default
event such as insolvency or failure to pay occurs or if material misrepresentations have been made to
Nomura.
(8) Hedges consist primarily of single-name CDS contracts where Nomura has purchased net protection against
GIIPS net counterparty credit exposures. Amounts disclosed are calculated based on notional amounts of thecontracts assuming zero recovery as adjusted for fair value movements. The counterparties to thesetransactions are non-GIIPS counterparties which are rated as investment grade using Nomura’s internal
credit rating methodology. Nomura will attempt to match the reference assets and maturity of the CDS
hedges to the underlying exposure against which they are hedging. In certain situations, however, hedges of
equivalent duration may not be available in the market and therefore a maturity mismatch may exist. Thesemismatches are actively monitored and managed by Nomura.
(9) Non-sovereign counterparties are primarily financial institutions located in these countries.

121

Amounts reported in net inventory exposures and hedges include single-name CDS contracts where Nomura
has either purchased or sold credit protection on a single name GIIPS underlying. The following table presents
the gross notional value and fair value of these contracts by relevant GIIPS country and by type of underlying.
Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
Purchased
protection
Sold protection
Notional
Fair
Notional
Fair
value
value
value
value

GreeceSovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IrelandSovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ —
71

¥—
3

¥ —
73

¥—
(3)

71

3

73

(3)

205
84

3
(8)

211
82

(3)
9

289

(5)

293

5

1,930
523

180
20

1,913
548

(185)
(20)

2,452

200

2,461

(205)

210
224

15
(0)

196
230

(15)
2

434

15

426

(13)

801
424

54
3

977
419

(70)
(3)

1,225

57

1,396

(74)

3,145
1,326

252
18

3,297
1,352

(273)
(16)

¥4,471¥270¥4,649¥(289)

Italy
Sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PortugalSovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Spain
Sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
Sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-sovereign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

These notional and fair value amounts are not representative of Nomura’s overall exposure as they exclude
the impact of master netting agreements and collateralization arrangements in place with the counterparties tothese transactions. See Note 3 “Derivative instruments and hedging activities” in our consolidated financial
statements included in this annual report for more information around the nature of Nomura’s credit derivative
activities, including the nature of payout or trigger events under these contracts.
In addition to the above direct exposures to these countries, Nomura also has indirect exposures to thesecountries as follows:•

We have exposure to other European sovereign and non-sovereign counterparties such as entities inFrance, Germany and the UK who themselves may have significant exposures to these countries. We
consider this indirect exposure to GIIPS as part of our usual credit risk management monitoringprocedures for these exposures;122•We have exposure to redenomination risk if the Euro is no longer used as the currency unit in one ormore GIIPS or other Eurozone countries. Redenomination risk arises when obligations of that country
are redenominated from Euro into a local currency, the local currency devalues against the Euro andother major global currencies which impacts upon other securities, contracts we have and the wider
markets. Nomura monitors and manages redenomination risk through scenario analyses which quantify
the potential impact on our GIIPS exposures; and•We have additional exposure to replacement risk arising from financial instruments entered into with
GIIPS counterparties. Replacement risk arises if a GIIPS counterparty defaults and we are required toreplace the transaction at additional cost to Nomura. Such replacement costs may arise if exposures tohedge are large or on illiquid financial instruments. We manage and mitigate replacement risk relating
to GIIPS counterparties by monitoring exposures on selected counterparties that we believe represent
the greatest risk, identifying any significant concentration of risks in order to reduce exposures whenpossible and being prepared to put in place a pre-emptive plan of action if such an event occurs.

Operational Risk Management
Overview of Operational Risk Management
In our Operational Risk Management Policy, we define operational risk as the risk of loss resulting frominadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems or from external events. It excludes strategic risk (therisk of loss as a result of poor strategic business decisions), but includes the risk of breach of legal and regulatory
requirements, and the risk of damage to our reputation if caused by an Operational Risk. As defined by the“Regulations for System Risk Management”, System Risk is considered to be a component of Operational Risk
as defined above.
Operational Risk Principles
The Nomura Group adopts the industry standard “Three Lines of Defence” for the management ofoperational risk, comprising the following elements:
1)

1st Line of Defence: The business units which owns and manages its risks

2)

2nd Line of Defence: The Operational Risk Management (“ORM”) function, which defines and coordinates the operational risk strategy and framework

3)

3rd Line of Defence: Internal and External Audit, who provide independent assurance

The Governing body: The GIRMC, with delegated authority from the Board of Directors, which provides
formal oversight.
This ensures appropriate oversight and independent review and challenge of operational risk management
throughout the Company.
Operational Risk Management Framework
We have established an Operational Risk Management Framework in order to allow us to identify, assess,manage, monitor and report on Operational Risk. Operational Risk Appetite is defined through a mixture ofqualitative appetite statements and quantitative measures utilising key components of the Operational Risk
Management Framework.
This framework is set out below:
Infrastructure of the framework•

Policy framework: Sets minimum standards for operational risk and details how to monitor adherence tothese standards•

Training and awareness: Action taken by ORM to improve business understanding of ORM
123

Products and Services•

Scenario analysis: Process to identify high impact, low probability ‘tail events’•Event reporting: Process to obtain information on and learn from actual events impacting on the
Company and relevant external events•

Key Risk Indicators (“KRI”): Metrics which allow monitoring of certain key operational risks•

Risk and Control Self Assessment (“RCSA”): Risk and Control Self Assessment process to identify key
risks, controls and action plans

Outputs•

Analysis and reporting: Key aspect of ORM role to analyze and report on ORM information and workwith business units to develop actions•

Operational risk capital calculation: Calculate operational risk capital under Basel II provisions andallocate to business units to improve the efficiency on profit vs risks

Operational Risk Classification
The Nomura Group uses the standard Basel II event type as operational risk classifications (namely, Internal
Fraud, External Fraud, Employee Practices and Workplace Safety, Clients, Products & Business Practices,
Damage to Physical Assets, Business Disruption and System Failures and Execution, Delivery & Process
Management).
Basel II regulatory capital calculation for operational risk
The Nomura Group uses The Standardized Approach (“TSA”) for calculating regulatory capital for
operational risk. This involves using a 3 year average of gross income, allocated to business lines and multiplied
by a fixed percentage determined by the FSA, to establish the amount of required operational risk capital.
The Nomura Group uses consolidated net revenue as gross income, however as for a part of the consolidated
subsidiaries, gross operating profit is used as gross income. Gross income allocation is performed by mapping the
net revenue of each given segment from management accounting data to each business line in accordance withthe categories:
Business Line

Retail Banking
Commercial Banking
Payment and Settlement
Retail Brokerage
Trading and Sales
Corporate FinanceAgency Services
Asset Management

Description

Beta Factor

Retail deposit and loan-related services
Deposit and loan-related services except for Retail Banking business
Payment and settlement services for clients’ transactions
Securities-related services mainly for individuals
Market-related business
M&A, underwriting, secondary and private offerings, and otherfunding services for clients
Agency services for clients such as custody
Fund management services for clients

12%
15%
18%
12%
18%
18%
15%
12%

Calculation Process of Basel II regulatory capital calculation for operational risk•

The Nomura Group then calculates capital for every business line by multiplying respectively allocatedannual gross income by the corresponding factors set out above. Any unallocable gross income ismultiplied by a fixed percentage of 18%.

124

•

Total operational risk capital is calculated as the three-year average of the simple summation of theamounts across each of the business lines and unallocable value in each year. However, where theaggregated amount within a given year is negative, then the input to the numerator for that year shall be
zero.

•

In any given year, negative numbers in any business line shall offset positive numbers in other businesslines. However, negative numbers in unallocable value shall not offset positive numbers in otherbusiness lines and shall be treated as zero.

•Operational risk capital is calculated twice a year; reference dates for the calculation are the end of
March and the end of September.

Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities
A. Debt Securities
Not applicable.
B. Warrants and Rights
Not applicable.
C. Other Securities
Not applicable.

125

D. American Depositary Shares
Fees payable by ADR Holders
The following table shows the fees and charges that a holder of the Company’s ADR may have to pay,either directly or indirectly:
Type of Services:

Amount of Fee (U.S. Dollars)

Taxes and other governmental charges

As applicable. The depositary may offset any taxes orgovernmental charges it is obligated to withhold, if
applicable, against the proceeds from sale of theproperty received.

Transfers of the Company’s shares to or from the nameof the depositary (or its nominee) or the Custodian (orits nominee) in connection with deposits orwithdrawals

Such registration fees as may be in effect for theregistration of transfers of the Company’s shares on
the Company’s share register (or any entity that
presently carries out the duties of registrar)

Cable, telex and facsimile transmission expenses

As applicable

Expenses incurred by the depositary in the conversion offoreign currency

As applicable

Execution and delivery of Receipts in connection withdeposits, stock splits or exercise of subscription rights$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)

Surrender of Receipts in connection with a withdrawal
or termination of the Deposit Agreement$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)

Any cash distribution pursuant to the Deposit
Agreement, including, but not limited to, cash
distribution(s) made in connection with: cash
dividends; distributions in securities, property or
subscription rights; and stock splits.

$.02 or less per ADS (or portion thereof). Only the
cash amounts net of this fee, if applicable, aredistributed

Distribution by the depositary of securities (other thancommon shares of the Company) that accrued on theunderlying shares to owners of the Receipts

Treating for the purpose of this fee all such securities
as if they were common shares of the Company,$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)

General depositary services$.02 or less per ADS (or portion thereof), accruing on
the last day of each calendar year, except where thefee for cash distribution described above wasassessed during that calendar year

Any other charge payable by the depositary, any of thedepositary’s agents, including the Custodian, or theagents of the depositary’s agents in connection withthe servicing of the Company’s shares or otherdeposited securities

As applicable

Fees paid to Nomura by the depositary
The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary, has agreed to pay all its standard out-of-pocket
administration and maintenance expenses for providing services to the registered shareholders and up to 100,000
non-registered shareholders of ADRs. From April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013, the Bank of New York Mellon has
waived a total of $160,054.72 in fees (including $27,719.90 in connection with the expenses related to theAnnual General Meeting of Shareholders) associated with the administration of the ADR program andadministrative fees for routine corporate actions and for providing investor relations information services.
126

PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our Disclosure Committee is responsible for the establishment and maintenance of our disclosure controls
and procedures. As of March 31, 2013, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with theparticipation of our management, including our Group Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, andthe Disclosure Committee, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, our Group Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2013, our disclosure controls andprocedures were effective.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Our
management, with the participation of our Group Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluatedthe effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth in the Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of March 31, 2013. Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young
ShinNihon LLC, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting, which appears on page F-3 of this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Our management also carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our Group Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended
March 31, 2013. Based upon that evaluation, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting
during the year ended March 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that Tsuguoki Fujinuma, a member of the Audit
Committee, is an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined by the General Instructions for Item
16A of Form 20-F. Additionally, Mr. Fujinuma meets the independence requirements applicable to him under
Section 303A.06 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. For a description of his business experience, see
Item 6.A of this annual report.
Item 16B. Code of Ethics
On March 5, 2004, the Company adopted the “Code of Ethics of Nomura Group” which includes the “Codeof Ethics for Financial Professionals” applicable to our financial professionals including the Company’s principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and persons performing similarfunctions.
127

Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC has been our principal accountants for SEC reporting purposes for the last
eleven fiscal years. The table set forth below contains the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal
years by our principal accountants in each of the following categories: (i) Audit Fees, which are fees for
professional services for the audit of our annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by theaccountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years, (ii) AuditRelated Fees, which are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of
the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported as Audit Fees, (iii) Tax Fees, which are feesfor professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, and (iv) All Other Fees, which
are fees for products and services other than Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax-Fees, such as advisory
work for risk management and regulatory matters.
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2012
2013

Audit Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Audit-Related Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
All Other Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥3,002217
128120¥2,90164
57
777

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥3,467¥3,799Audit-Related Fees included fees for services relating to consultations on accounting issues relating to ourbusiness such as securitization. Tax Fees included fees for services relating to tax planning and compliance. All
Other Fees included fees for services relating to advice with respect to regulations and disclosures under the
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act in connection with our underwriting business.
In accordance with the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued pursuant to Sections
202 and 208 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy
regarding the engagements of our principal accountants. Under the pre-approval policy, there are two types ofpre-approval procedures, “General Pre-Approval” and “Specific Pre-Approval.”
Under the pre-approval procedure for “General Pre-Approval,” our CFO in conjunction with our principal
accountants must make a proposal to our Audit Committee for the types of services and estimated fee levels ofeach category of services to be generally pre-approved. Such proposal must be made no less frequently thanannually. The Audit Committee will discuss the proposal and if necessary consult with outside professionals as towhether the proposed services would impair the independence of our principal accountants. If such proposal isaccepted, our Audit Committee will inform our CFO and principal accountants of the services that have generally
been pre-approved and included in a “General Pre-Approved List.” Our Audit Committee is informed of eachsuch service that is provided.
Under the pre-approval procedure for “Specific Pre-Approval,” if any proposed services are not on the
General Pre-Approved List, our CFO must submit an application to our Audit Committee for such services. After
reviewing the details and estimated fee levels for each engagement and if necessary consulting with outside
professionals as to whether the proposed services would impair the independence of our principal accountants,
our Audit Committee may make a specific pre-approval decision on these services. Also, if any approved
services in the General Pre-Approved List exceed the fee levels prescribed on the List, our CFO must submit anapplication to our Audit Committee for new fee levels for such services. Our Audit Committee may make a
pre-approval decision after reviewing the details of the services and the estimated fee levels for eachengagement.
None of the services described in the first paragraph under this Item 16C were waived from the pre-approvalrequirement pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
128

Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
The Company does not avail itself of any exemption from the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, we acquired 19,209 shares of our common stock by means ofrepurchase of shares constituting less than one unit upon the request of the holders of those shares. For an
explanation of the right of our shareholders to demand such repurchases by us, see “Common Stock” under
Item 10.B of this annual report. As of March 31, 2013, we had 3,710,960,252 outstanding shares excluding
111,602,349 shares as treasury stock.
We had not established share buyback programs nor purchased our common stock utilizing the programs
during the year ended March 31, 2013.
On April 26, 2013, we announced a resolution of the Board of Directors to establish a share buyback
program in accordance with Article 459-1 of the Companies Act. The period of repurchase under the program
was from May 8, 2013 to May 31, 2013, and we were authorized to purchase up to 40,000,000 shares of ourcommon stock or to a maximum of ¥35,000,000,000. On May 10, 2013, we announced that the aggregate numberof shares repurchased through this buyback program was 40,000,000 shares and the aggregate value of shares
repurchased was ¥32,470,386,300.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our purchases of shares of our common
stock during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.

Month

Total
Number of
SharesPurchased

Average Price
Paid perShare(in yen)

Total
Number of
SharesPurchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
ProgramApril 1 to 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
May 1 to 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
June 1 to 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
July 1 to 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
August 1 to 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
September 1 to 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
October 1 to 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
November 1 to 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 1 to 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
January 1 to 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
February 1 to 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
March 1 to 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

889
956
1,043
1,736
1,856
1,008
1,471
1,182
2,213
1,859
2,918
2,078

352
303
271
277
278
283
276
305
373
498
529
566

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19,209386——

Maximum
Number of
Shares thatMay Yet Be
Purchased
Under
the Program

Nomura recognizes the need to set out flexible financial strategies that allow the Board of Directors to
respond quickly to any changes in the business environment and is looking into implementing further sharebuybacks. Details will be announced when finalized.
As of May 31, 2013, 3,695,023,003 shares of Nomura Holdings were outstanding, excluding 127,539,598
shares held as treasury stock.
129

Item 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant
Not applicable.
Item 16G. Corporate Governance
Companies listed on the NYSE must comply with certain standards regarding corporate governance under
Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. However, listed companies that are foreign private issuers,
such as the Company, are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of certain provisions ofSection 303A.
The following table shows the significant differences between the corporate governance practices followedby U.S. listed companies under Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and those followed by theCompany. The information set forth below is current as of the date of this annual report.
Corporate Governance Practices Followed
by NYSE-listed U.S. Companies

Corporate Governance Practices Followed by the Company

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must have a majority of
Directors meeting the independence requirements under
Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.

Under the Companies Act, a company which adopts
the Committee System is not required to have amajority of outside directors, but is required to have amajority of outside directors on each of the audit,
nomination and compensation committees. An
outside director is defined under the Companies Act
as a non-executive director who does not currently
assume, and has never assumed, the position of
executive director, executive officer, manager or
employee of the company or its subsidiaries.
The Company, while meeting the requirements of theCompanies Act, has six outside directors among its
eleven Directors.

The non-management directors of a NYSE-listed U.S. Under the Companies Act, the Company is notcompany must meet at regularly scheduled executive required to hold such executive sessions for its
sessions without management.
outside directors.
A NYSE-listed U.S. company must have an audit
committee that satisfies the requirements under
Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual,including those imposed by Rule 10A-3 under the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The audit committee
must be composed entirely of independent directors andhave at least three members.

The Company has an Audit Committee consisting of
three Directors, all of whom are independent directors
under Rule 10A-3 under the U.S. Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. The Audit Committee is in charge ofmonitoring the performance of the Directors andExecutive Officers of the Company and to propose
the appointment or dismissal of its independent
auditors and accounting firm. The Audit Committee
satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must have a nominating/corporate governance committee with responsibilities
described under Section 303A of the NYSE Listed
Company
Manual.
Thenominating/corporate
governance committee must be composed entirely of
independent directors.

The Company has a Nomination Committee
consisting of three Directors, two of whom areoutside directors. The Nomination Committee is incharge of proposing to the meeting of shareholders
the election or dismissal of Directors of the Company.

130Corporate Governance Practices Followed
by NYSE-listed U.S. Companies

Corporate Governance Practices Followed by the Company

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must have acompensation committee with responsibilities describedunder Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual. The compensation committee must becomposed entirely of independent directors.

The Company has a Compensation Committee
consisting of three Directors, two of whom areoutside directors. The Compensation Committee is incharge of determining the compensation of each
Director and Executive Officer of the Company.

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must generally obtainshareholder approval with respect to any equity
compensation plan.

The Compensation Committee establishes the policy
with respect to the determination of the individualcompensation of each of the Company’s Directors
and Executive Officers (including stock options in theform of stock acquisition rights as equity
compensation) and makes determinations inaccordance with that compensation policy. Under theCompanies Act, stock options are deemed to becompensation for the services performed by theCompany’s Directors and Executive Officers.

Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.

131

PART III
Item 17. Financial Statements
In lieu of responding to this item, we have responded to Item 18 of this annual report.
Item 18. Financial Statements
The information required by this item is set forth in our consolidated financial statements included in thisannual report.

132

Item 19. Exhibits
Exhibit
NumberDescription

1.1

Articles of Incorporation of the registrant (English translation) (filed on June 30, 2011 as an exhibit to theAnnual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)

1.2

Share Handling Regulations of the registrant (English translation) (filed on April 7, 2010 as an exhibit to theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-165925) and incorporated herein by reference)

1.3

Regulations of the Board of Directors of the registrant (English translation) (filed on June 30, 2011 as an
exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)

1.4

Regulations of the Nomination Committee (English translation) (filed on June 30, 2009 as an exhibit to theAnnual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)

1.5

Regulations of the Audit Committee (English translation) (filed on June 30, 2009 as an exhibit to the Annual
Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)

1.6

Regulations of the Compensation Committee (English translation) (filed on June 27, 2012 as an exhibit to theAnnual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)

2.1

Form of Deposit Agreement among the registrant, The Bank of New York Mellon as depositary and all owners
and holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts, including the form of American Depositary
Receipt (filed on April 28, 2010 as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333166346) and incorporated herein by reference)

4.1

Limitation of Liability Agreement (English translation) (filed on June 30, 2011 as an exhibit to the Annual
Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)(1)4.2

Limitation of Liability Agreement (filed on June 30, 2011 as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 20-F
(File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)(2)8.1

Subsidiaries of the registrant—See “Item 4.C. Information on the Company—Organizational Structure.”

11.1

Code of Ethics of Nomura Group (English translation) (filed on June 27, 2012 as an exhibit to the Annual
Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)

12.1

Certification of the principal executive officer required by 17 C.F.R. 240. 13a-14(a)12.2

Certification of the principal financial officer required by 17 C.F.R. 240. 13a-14(a)13.1

Certification of the chief executive officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

13.2

Certification of the chief financial officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

15.1

Consent of Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC with respect to its report on the audit of the financial statements
included in this annual report

15.2

Consent of Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC with respect to its report on the audit of the financial statements
included in this annual report

101.INSXBRL Instance Document

101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase(1) The Company and each of Masahiro Sakane, Toshinori Kanemoto, Tsuguoki Fujinuma and Takao Kusakari entered intoa Limitation of Liability Agreement substantially in the form of this exhibit.
(2) The Company and each of Dame Clara Furse and Michael Lim Choo San entered into a Limitation of Liability
Agreement substantially in the form of this exhibit.

The Company has not included as exhibits certain instruments with respect to our long-term debt. The
amount of debt authorized under each such debt instrument does not exceed 10% or our total assets. We will
furnish a copy of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.
133

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page

Consolidated Financial Statements of Nomura Holdings, Inc.:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . .

F-7

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-8

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-9Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 . . . . . .

F-11

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-13

Consolidated Financial Statements of Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

A-1

Pursuant to Regulation S-X, Rule 3-09, this annual report contains the consolidated financial statements of
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. (“NRI”), an equity method affiliate of Nomura Holdings, Inc. (“Company”). The
consolidated financial statements of NRI contained herein, which are as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 and for theyears ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in Japan. The equity of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries in the income before
income taxes of NRI exceeded 20%, but did not exceed 30%, of such income of the Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2012, while such percentages for the years ended
March 31, 2011 and 2013 did not exceed 20%. The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries’ investments inand advances to NRI did not exceed 20% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries asof March 31, 2011, 2012 or 2013. Accordingly, pursuant to Regulation S-X, Rule 3-09 as well as Item 17 ofForm 20-F, of the consolidated financial statements of NRI contained herein, only those as of and for the year
ended March 31, 2012 have been audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States.

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nomura Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) as ofMarch 31, 2012 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes inequity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2013. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesefinancial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing theaccounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Nomura Holdings, Inc. at March 31, 2012 and 2013, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2013, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States), Nomura Holdings, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013, based on
criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated June 27, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC
Tokyo, Japan
June 27, 2013

F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
We have audited Nomura Holdings, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013, basedon criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Nomura Holdings, Inc.’s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on theassessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believethat our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonableassurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being madeonly in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonableassurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of thecompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with thepolicies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Nomura Holdings, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control overfinancial reporting as of March 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Nomura Holdings, Inc. as of March 31, 2012 and 2013, andthe related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for eachof the three years in the period ended March 31, 2013 and our report dated June 27, 2013 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC
Tokyo, Japan
June 27, 2013
F-3

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSMillions of yen
March 31
2012
2013

ASSETSCash and cash deposits:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 1,070,520 ¥ 805,087
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
653,462
577,921
Deposits with stock exchanges and other segregated cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
229,695
269,744
Total cash and cash deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,953,677
1,652,752
Loans and receivables:
Loans receivable (including ¥458,352 million and ¥524,049 million measured
at fair value by applying the fair value option in 2012 and 2013,
respectively) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,293,372
1,575,494
Receivables from customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
58,31063,792
Receivables from other than customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
864,629992,847
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4,888)(2,258)
Total loans and receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,211,423
2,629,875
Collateralized agreements:
Securities purchased under agreements to resell (including ¥752,407 millionand ¥997,788 million measured at fair value by applying the fair value
option in 2012 and 2013, respectively) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,662,748
8,295,372
Securities borrowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,079,898
5,819,885
Total collateralized agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13,742,646
14,115,257
Trading assets and private equity investments:
Trading assets (including securities pledged as collateral of¥4,732,118 million and ¥7,707,813 million in 2012 and 2013, respectively;
including ¥16,548 million and ¥19,970 million measured at fair value by
applying the fair value option in 2012 and 2013, respectively) . . . . . . . . . . .
13,921,639
17,037,191
Private equity investments (including ¥53,635 million and ¥44,134 million
measured at fair value by applying the fair value option in 2012 and 2013,
respectively) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
201,955
87,158
Total trading assets and private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14,123,594
17,124,349
Other assets:
Office buildings, land, equipment and facilities (net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization of ¥355,804 million and ¥355,831 million in2012 and 2013, respectively) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,045,950
428,241
Non-trading debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
862,758
920,611
Investments in equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
88,187
123,490
Investments in and advances to affiliated companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
193,954345,705
Other (including ¥1,627 million and ¥1,632 million measured at fair value by
applying the fair value option in 2012 and 2013, respectively) . . . . . . . . . . .
1,475,123
602,159
Total other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,665,972
2,420,206
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥35,697,312 ¥37,942,439

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS—(Continued)
Millions of yen
March 31
2012
2013

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Short-term borrowings (including ¥153,497 million and ¥77,036 million measured
at fair value by applying the fair value option in 2012 and 2013, respectively) . . . ¥ 1,185,613 ¥ 738,445
Payables and deposits:
Payables to customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
764,857
476,705
Payables to other than customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
767,860
864,962
Deposits received at banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
904,653
1,072,134
Total payables and deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,437,370

2,413,801

Collateralized financing:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (including ¥307,083 millionand ¥264,767 million measured at fair value by applying the fair value
option in 2012 and 2013, respectively) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities loaned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other secured borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,928,293
1,700,029
890,952

12,444,317
2,158,559
806,507

Total collateralized financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12,519,274

15,409,383

Trading liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities (including ¥4,246 million and ¥2,360 million measured at fairvalue by applying the fair value option in 2012 and 2013, respectively) . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings (including ¥1,925,421 million and ¥1,664,536 million
measured at fair value by applying the fair value option in 2012 and 2013,
respectively) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7,495,177

8,491,296

1,165,901

978,1638,504,840

7,592,368

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33,308,175

35,623,456

Commitments and contingencies (Note 22)
Equity:Nomura Holdings, Inc. (“NHI”) shareholders’ equity:
Common stock
No par value shares;
Authorized—6,000,000,000 shares in 2012 and 2013
Issued—3,822,562,601 shares in 2012 and 2013
Outstanding—3,663,483,895 shares in 2012 and 3,710,960,252 shares in2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

594,493698,771
1,058,945(145,149)

594,493691,264
1,136,523(57,395)

Total NHI shareholder’s equity before treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock held in treasury, at cost—159,078,706 shares in 2012 and111,602,349 shares in 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,207,060

2,364,885(99,819)(70,514)

Total NHI shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,107,241

2,294,371

Noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

281,896
2,389,137

24,612
2,318,983

Total liabilities and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥35,697,312¥37,942,439

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5

The following table presents the classification of consolidated variable interest entities’ (“VIEs”) assets andliabilities. The assets of a consolidated VIE may only be used to settle obligations of that VIE. Creditors do nothave any recourse to Nomura beyond the assets held in the VIEs. See Note 8 “Securitizations and Variable
Interest Entities” for further information.
Billions of yen
March 312012
2013

Cash and cash deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading assets and private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥

52
999
555

¥ 13
695
93

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,606¥801

Trading liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥

42
35
992

¥ 21
11
458

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,069¥490

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

2011

Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2012

Revenue:Commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fees from investment banking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset management and portfolio service fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gain on trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest and dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain (loss) on investments in equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 405,463 ¥
107,005
143,939
336,503
19,292
346,103(16,677)
43,864

Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2013

347,135
59,638144,251
272,557
25,098435,890
4,005
563,186¥ 359,069
62,353141,029
367,979
8,053
394,007
38,686
708,767

1,385,492
254,794

1,851,760
315,901

2,079,943
266,312

Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,130,698

1,535,859

1,813,631

Non-interest expenses:
Compensation and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commissions and floor brokerage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Information processing and communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Occupancy and related depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

518,993
92,088
182,918
87,84330,153
125,448534,648
93,500177,148
100,891
48,488496,227

547,591
91,388
179,904
91,54549,010616,463

Total non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,037,443

1,450,902

1,575,901

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93,25584,957

237,730

Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61,33058,903132,039

26,054¥ 105,691

14,471(1,543)

11,583¥ 107,234

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . .
Net income attributable to NHI shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

31,925¥

3,264¥

28,661¥Yen

Per share of common stock:
Basic— . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income attributable to NHI shareholders per share . . . . . . . . . .

¥

7.90

¥

3.18

¥

29.04

Diluted— . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income attributable to NHI shareholders per share . . . . . . . . . .

¥

7.86

¥

3.14

¥

28.37

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in cumulative translation adjustments, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Defined benefit pension plans:
Pension liability adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 31,925¥ 26,054¥105,691(24,151)(13,801)

74,301

4,074(1,542)(4,203)
1,548

8,702
(3,007)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,532(2,655)

5,695

Non-trading securities:
Net unrealized gain on non-trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—

1,339
(498)

17,283(4,650)Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—841

12,633

Total other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(21,619)(15,615)

92,629Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . .

10,306
2,209

10,43914,309198,320
3,332

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to NHI shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 8,097¥ (3,870) ¥194,988

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-8

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

2011

Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2012

2013

Common stock
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 594,493¥ 594,493¥ 594,493

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

594,493594,493594,493

Additional paid-in capital
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain (loss) on sales of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance and exercise of common stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase / sale of subsidiary shares, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

635,828
—
3,191
7,296
—

646,315
30,356719
19,466
1,915

698,771—(1,798)(5,700)(9)Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

646,315

698,771

691,264Retained earnings
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1) . . . . . . . . . .
Net income attributable to NHI shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,074,213(4,734)
28,661(28,806)

1,069,334—
11,583(21,972)

1,058,945—
107,234(29,656)

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,069,334

1,058,945

1,136,523

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Cumulative translation adjustments
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(74,330)(23,096)(97,426)(13,226)(110,652)
71,777

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(97,426)(110,652)(38,875)

Defined benefit pension plans
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension liability adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(34,802)2,532(32,270)(2,862)(35,132)
6,614

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(32,270)(35,132)(28,518)

Non-trading securities
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net unrealized gain on non-trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—

—
635

635
9,363

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

635

9,998

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(129,696)(145,149)(57,395)

F-9

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY—(Continued)

2011

Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2012

2013

Common stock held in treasury
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repurchases of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock issued to employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other net change in treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(68,473)(37,378)
4
8,155—(97,692)(8,944)
1
6,693
123

(99,819)(7)
1
29,507(196)

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(97,692)(99,819)(70,514)

Total NHI shareholders’ equity
Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,082,754

2,107,241

2,294,371

Noncontrolling interests
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable tononcontrolling interests
Cumulative translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net unrealized gain on non-trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension liability adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase / sale of subsidiary shares, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other net change in noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,085
(100)
3,264

8,882
(2,760)14,471

281,896(3,422)(1,543)(1,055)
—
—
0
688

(575)
206
207
271,515(10,050)

2,524
3,270
(919)
(247,782)(9,412)

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8,882

281,896

24,612

Total equity
Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥2,091,636¥2,389,137¥2,318,983(1) Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the year ended March 31, 2011 is an adjustment toinitially apply Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-17 “Consolidation (Topic 810):
Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities”(“ASU 2009-17”).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-10

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSMillions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock option expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain) loss on investments in equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of dividends received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on disposal of office buildings, land, equipment and facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deposits with stock exchanges and other segregated cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading assets and private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities purchased under agreements to resell, net of securities sold under agreements
to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities borrowed, net of securities loaned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other secured borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans and receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bonus accrual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued income taxes, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥31,925¥26,054¥

105,691

75,587
18,638
16,677(6,800)6,348
55,199100,572
26,869(4,005)(969)
5,351
37,77291,493
21,955(38,686)(13,003)
17,641
53,957(155,251)(67,738)(1,481,908)
1,206,394(318,104)(39,225)
971,327(1,058,445)

137,526(9,461)(1,448,489)
248,019

327,668(446,152)(160,031)(354,691)
319,506(8,802)(26,174)
414,515980,156(508,844)(271,498)
28,933218,915(13,356)
5,055
104,305

1,375,929
863,511(84,444)(238,318)(305,672)
31,41550,019(309,582)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(235,090)

290,863549,501

Cash flows from investing activities:
Payments for purchases of office buildings, land, equipment and facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of office buildings, land, equipment and facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments for purchases of investments in equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of investments in equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Increase) decrease in loans receivable at banks, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in non-trading debt securities, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business combinations or disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease (increase) in investments in affiliated companies, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(186,350)
109,888(221)
3,247(60,350)(286,013)
5,570(8,936)(49)(182,568)
120,435(138)
5,485
30,591(968)
35,5972,146(638)(271,975)
147,653(319)
3,741
22,189(54,237)(5,919)(1,391)(228)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(423,214)

9,942(160,486)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Increase in long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in short-term borrowings, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in deposits received at banks, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of common stock held in treasury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments for repurchases of common stock held in treasury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments for cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,267,658(1,188,034)(97,282)
368,3548(37,378)(29,083)

2,015,446(2,883,078)(56,383)
117,047
10(8,287)(29,066)

1,930,357(2,330,509)(416,174)
129,38456(7)(14,730)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,284,243(844,311)(701,623)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(26,246)(6,314)47,175

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

599,6931,020,647(549,820)
1,620,340(265,433)
1,070,520

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 1,620,340¥ 1,070,520¥

805,087

Supplemental information:
Cash paid during the year for—
Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥259,679¥

338,802¥296,643

Income tax payments, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥32,305¥

16,076¥28,063

F-11

Non cash activities—
Business acquisitions:
Assets acquired, excluding cash and cash equivalents, and debt assumed were ¥2,132,740 million and¥1,784,621 million, respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2012.
Business dispositions:
Assets sold, excluding cash and cash equivalents, and debt assumed by the purchaser were
¥1,488,853 million and ¥1,166,556 million, respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2013.
Other:
During the year ended March 31, 2011, as a result of adoption of ASU 2009-17, assets excluding cash andcash equivalent increased by ¥275,464 million and liabilities increased by ¥289,757 million.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-12

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of accounting policies:
Description of business—
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and its broker-dealer, banking and other financial services
subsidiaries provide investment, financing and related services to individual, institutional and government clientson a global basis. The Company and other entities in which it has a controlling financial interest are collectively
referred to as “Nomura” within these consolidated financial statements.
Nomura operates its business through various divisions based upon the nature of specific products andservices, its main client base and its management structure. Nomura reports operating results through threebusiness segments: Retail, Asset Management and Wholesale.
In its Retail segment, Nomura provides investment consultation services mainly to individual clients inJapan. In its Asset Management segment, Nomura develops and manages investment trusts, and provides
investment advisory services. In its Wholesale segment, Nomura is engaged in the sales and trading of debt andequity securities and currencies on a global basis to various institutions, provides investment banking services
such as the underwriting of debt and equity securities as well as mergers and acquisitions and financial advice
and invests in private equity businesses and seeks to maximize returns on these investments by increasing thecorporate value of investee companies.
Basis of presentation—
The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) as applicable to broker-dealers.
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and other entities in which it
has a controlling financial interest. The Company initially determines whether it has a controlling financial
interest in an entity by evaluating whether the entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) under Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 810 “Consolidation”(“ASC 810”). VIEs are entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial
interest or which do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support. The Company consolidates VIEs where Nomura is the primary beneficiary,
which is where Nomura holds variable interests that provide power over the most significant activities of the VIEand the right to receive benefits or the obligation to absorb losses meeting a significance test, provided that
Nomura is not acting as a fiduciary for other interest holders. For certain VIE that qualify as investmentcompanies under ASC 946 “Financial Services—Investment Companies” (“ASC 946”) or for which it is industry
practice to apply guidance consistent with the measurement principles in ASC 946, Nomura is the primary
beneficiary when it holds an interest that will absorb a majority of the expected losses or a majority of the
expected residual returns of the entity, or both.
For entities other than VIEs, Nomura is generally determined to have a controlling financial interest in an
entity when it owns a majority of the voting interests.
Equity investments in entities in which Nomura has significant influence over operating and financial
decisions (generally defined as 20 to 50 percent of the voting stock of a corporate entity, or at least 3 percent of alimited partnership) are accounted for under the equity method of accounting (“equity method investments”) andreported within Other assets—Investments in and advances to affiliated companies or at fair value by electing thefair value option permitted by ASC 825 “Financial Instruments” (“ASC 825”) and reported within Trading
assets or Private equity investments or Other assets—Other. Investments undertaken by Nomura’s merchantbanking business are reported within Private equity investments and Other assets—Other. Other investments are
F-13

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
reported within Trading assets. Equity investments in which Nomura has neither control nor significant influence
are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through the consolidated statements of income or
the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Certain entities in which Nomura has a financial interest are investment companies under ASC 946. These
entities, including subsidiaries such as Nomura Principal Finance Co., Ltd. (“NPF”), carry all of theirinvestments at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through the consolidated statements of income.
The Company’s principal subsidiaries include Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. (“NSC”), Nomura Securities
International, Inc. (“NSI”) and Nomura International plc (“NIP”).
All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation. Certain
reclassifications of previously reported amounts have been made to conform to the current year presentation.
Use of estimates—
In presenting these consolidated financial statements, management makes estimates regarding the valuationof certain financial instruments and investments, the outcome of litigation and tax examinations, the recovery of
the carrying value of goodwill, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the realization of deferred tax assets andother matters that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as well as the disclosures in these
consolidated financial statements. Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgment and available information.
Therefore, actual results may differ from estimates which could have a material impact on these consolidated
financial statements, and it is possible that such adjustments could occur in the near term.
Fair value of financial instruments—
A significant amount of Nomura’s financial assets and financial liabilities are carried at fair value, withchanges in fair value recognized through the consolidated statements of income or the consolidated statements ofcomprehensive income. Use of fair value is either specifically required under U.S. GAAP or Nomura makes anelection to use fair value for certain eligible items under the fair value option.
Other financial assets and financial liabilities are carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, where theprimary measurement basis is not fair value. Fair value is only used in specific circumstances after initialrecognition, such as to measure impairment.
In all cases, fair value is determined in accordance with ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements andDisclosures” (“ASC 820”) which defines fair value as the amount that would be exchanged to sell a financial
asset or transfer a financial liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. It assumes that the transaction occurs in Nomura’s principal market, or in the absence of a principal market,
the most advantageous market for the relevant financial asset or financial liability. See Note 2 “Fair value
measurements” for further information regarding how Nomura estimates fair value for specific types of financial
instruments used in the ordinary course of business.
Private equity business—
Private equity investments are generally carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized throughthe consolidated statements of income. See Note 4 “Private equity business” for further information.
F-14

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Transfers of financial assets—
Nomura accounts for the transfer of a financial asset as a sale when Nomura relinquishes control over theasset by meeting the following conditions: (a) the asset has been isolated from the transferor (even in bankruptcy
or other receivership), (b) the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the asset received, or if the transferee
is an entity whose sole purpose is to engage in securitization or asset-backed financing activities, if, the holdersof its beneficial interests have the right to pledge or exchange the beneficial interests held and (c) the transferor
has not maintained effective control over the transferred asset.
In connection with its securitization activities, Nomura utilizes special purpose entities (“SPEs”) tosecuritize commercial and residential mortgage loans, government and corporate securities and other types offinancial assets. Nomura’s involvement with SPEs includes structuring and underwriting, distributing and sellingdebt instruments and beneficial interests issued by SPEs to investors. Nomura derecognizes financial assets
transferred in securitizations provided that Nomura has relinquished control over such assets and does notconsolidate the SPE. Nomura may obtain or retain an interest in the financial assets, including residual interestsin the SPEs dependent upon prevailing market conditions. Any such interests are accounted for at fair value andreported within Trading assets in the consolidated balance sheets with the change in fair value reported within
Revenue—Net gain on trading in the consolidated statements of income.
Foreign currency translation—
The financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries are measured using their functional currency whichis the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. All assets and liabilities ofsubsidiaries which have a functional currency other than Japanese yen are translated into Japanese yen at
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date; all revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange
rates for the respective years and the resulting translation adjustments are accumulated and reported within
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in NHI shareholders’ equity.
Foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date andthe resulting translation gains or losses are credited or charged to the consolidated statements of income.
Fee revenue—
Revenue—Commissions includes amounts charged for executing brokerage transactions accrued on a tradedate basis and are included in current period earnings. Revenue—Fees from investment banking includes
securities underwriting fees and other corporate financing services fees. Underwriting fees are recorded whenservices for underwriting are completed. All other fees are recognized when related services are performed.
Revenue—Asset management and portfolio service fees are accrued over the period that the related services areprovided or when specified performance requirements are met.
Trading assets and trading liabilities—
Trading assets and Trading liabilities primarily comprise debt and equity securities, derivatives and loans
which are generally recognized on the consolidated balance sheets on a trade date basis and carried at fair value
with changes in fair value reported within Revenue—Net gain on trading in the consolidated statements ofincome.

F-15

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Collateralized agreements and collateralized financing—
Collateralized agreements consist of resale agreements and securities borrowed. Collateralized financing
consists of repurchase agreements, securities loaned and other secured borrowings.
Resale and repurchase agreements (“repo transactions”) principally involve the buying or selling ofgovernment and government agency securities under agreements with clients to resell or repurchase thesesecurities to or from those clients. Repo transactions are generally accounted for as collateralized agreements orcollateralized financing transactions and are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at the amount at which
the securities were originally acquired or sold with applicable accrued interest, as appropriate. Certain repo
transactions are carried at fair value through election of the fair value option. No allowance for credit losses isgenerally recorded on repurchase agreements due to the strict collateralization requirements.
Repo transactions where the maturity of the security transferred as collateral matches the maturity of therepo transaction (“repo-to-maturity transactions”) are accounted for as sales rather than collateralized financings
where the criteria for derecognition of the securities transferred under ASC 860 “Transfers and Servicing”(“ASC 860”) are met. The amounts of securities derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets underrepo-to-maturity transactions as of March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013 were ¥39,797 million and ¥nil,
respectively.
Nomura also enters into Gensaki Repo transactions which are the standard type of repurchase transactionused in the Japanese financial market. Gensaki Repo transactions contain margin requirements, rights of security
substitution, and certain restrictions on the client’s right to sell or repledge the transferred securities. Gensaki
Repo transactions are accounted for as collateralized agreements or collateralized financing transactions and arerecorded on the consolidated balance sheets at the amount that the securities were originally acquired or soldwith applicable accrued interest, as appropriate.
Repo transactions (including Gensaki Repo transactions) are presented in the consolidated balance sheets
net-by-counterparty, where offsetting is consistent with ASC 210-20 “Balance Sheet—Offsetting” (“ASC 210-20”).
Securities borrowed and securities loaned are generally accounted for as collateralized agreements andcollateralized financing transactions, respectively. Securities borrowed and securities loaned are generally cash
collateralized and are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at the amount of cash collateral advanced or
received. No allowance for credit losses is generally recorded on securities borrowing transactions due to thestrict collateralization requirements.
Nomura adopted Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-03 “Reconsideration of Effective Control
for Repurchase Agreements” (“ASU 2011-03”) from January 1, 2012 and certain Japanese securities lendingtransactions undertaken after adoption date were accounted for as secured borrowings rather than sales in these
consolidated financial statements as the criteria for derecognition of the transferred financial assets under
ASC 860 were no longer be met. The agreements governing these transactions included varying margining
requirements, but the amount of cash Nomura borrows from its counterparties was typically less than the fairvalue of securities Nomura lends. The amount of the “haircut” was set by percentages agreed between the twoparties. Following adoption of ASU 2011-03, the levels of cash collateral, haircuts and ongoing margining
received by Nomura in these transactions are now irrelevant in determining whether these should be accounted
for as sales or secured borrowings.
However, since the amendments were to be applied prospectively, any outstanding transactions as of
adoption date continued to be reported as sales through until maturity.
F-16

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The amounts of securities derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets under this type of securities
lending transaction as of March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013 were ¥1,930 million and ¥nil, respectively.
Other secured borrowings consist primarily of secured borrowings from financial institutions and central
banks in the inter-bank money market, and are recorded at contractual amounts due.
Trading balances of secured borrowings consist of liabilities related to transfers of financial assets that are
accounted for as secured financing transactions rather than sales and are reported in the consolidated balance
sheets within Long-term borrowings. The fair value option is generally elected for these transactions, which arecarried at fair value on a recurring basis. See Note 8 “Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities” and Note 13“Borrowings” for further information regarding these transactions.
All Nomura-owned securities pledged to counterparties where the counterparty has the right to sell or
repledge the securities, including Gensaki Repo transactions, are reported parenthetically within Trading assets
as Securities pledged as collateral in the consolidated balance sheets.
Derivatives—
Nomura uses a variety of derivative financial instruments, including futures, forwards, swaps and options,for both trading and non-trading purposes. All freestanding derivatives are carried at fair value in the
consolidated balance sheets and reported within Trading assets or Trading liabilities depending on whether fairvalue is positive or negative, respectively. Certain derivatives embedded in hybrid financial instruments such as
structured notes and certificates of deposit are bifurcated from the host contract and are also carried at fair value
in the consolidated balance sheets and reported within Short-term borrowings or Long-term borrowings
depending on the maturity of the underlying host contract.
Changes in fair value are recognized either through the consolidated statements of income or the
consolidated statements of comprehensive income depending on the purpose for which the derivatives are used.
Derivative assets and liabilities are presented in the consolidated balance sheets on a net-by-counterparty
basis where offsetting is consistent with ASC 210-20. In addition, fair value amounts recognized for the right toreclaim cash collateral (a receivable) and the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) are also offset
against net derivative liabilities and net derivative assets, respectively.
Trading
Derivative financial instruments used for trading purposes, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, arecarried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in the consolidated statements of income within
Revenue—Net gain on trading.
Non-trading
In addition to its trading activities, Nomura uses derivative financial instruments for other than trading
purposes such as to manage risk exposures arising from recognized assets and liabilities, forecasted transactions
and firm commitments. Certain derivatives used for non-trading purposes are formally designated as fair value
and net investment accounting hedges under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”).
Nomura designates derivative financial instruments as fair value hedges of interest rate risk arising from
specific financial liabilities. These derivatives are effective in reducing the risk associated with the exposure
F-17

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
being hedged and they are highly correlated with changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged item, both atinception and throughout the life of the hedge contract. Changes in fair value of the hedging derivatives arereported together with those of the hedged liabilities through the consolidated statements of income withinInterest expense.
Derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of the net investment in foreign operations are linked
to specific subsidiaries with non-Japanese yen functional currencies. When determining the effectiveness of net
investment hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the hedging derivative is determined bychanges in spot exchange rates and is reported through NHI shareholders’ equity within Accumulated othercomprehensive income (loss). The change in fair value of the hedging derivatives attributable to changes in the
difference between the forward rate and spot rate is excluded from the measure of hedge effectiveness and isreported in the consolidated statements of income within Revenue—Other.
See Note 3 “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for further information.
Loans receivable—
Loans receivable are loans which management intends to hold for the foreseeable future. Loans receivable
are either carried at fair value or at amortized cost. Interest earned on loans receivable is generally reported in the
consolidated statements of income within Revenue—Interest and dividends.
Loans receivable carried at fair value
Certain loans which are risk managed on a fair value basis are carried at fair value through election of thefair value option. Nomura makes this election to mitigate volatility in the consolidated statements of income
caused by the difference in measurement basis that would otherwise exist between the loans and the derivatives
used to risk manage those loans. Changes in the fair value of loans receivable carried at fair value are reported in
the consolidated statements of income within Revenue—Net gain on trading.
Loans receivable carried at amortized cost
Loans receivable which are not carried at fair value are carried at amortized cost. Amortized cost represents
cost adjusted for deferred fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans and after
deducting any applicable allowance for loan losses.
Loan origination fees, net of direct origination costs, are amortized to Revenue—Interest and dividends as an
adjustment to yield over the life of the loan. Net unamortized deferred fees and costs were ¥552 million and¥406 million as of March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013, respectively.
See Note 9 “Financing receivables” for further information.
Other receivables—
Receivables from customers include amounts receivable on client securities transactions and Receivablesfrom other than customers include amounts receivable for securities not delivered to a purchaser by thesettlement date, margin deposits, commissions, and net receivables arising from unsettled securities transactions.
The net receivable arising from unsettled securities transactions reported within Receivables from other thancustomers was ¥nil and ¥258,604 million as of March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013, respectively.
F-18

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
These amounts are carried at contractual amounts due less any applicable allowance for credit losses whichreflects management’s best estimate of probable losses incurred within receivables which have been specifically
identified as impaired. The allowance for credit losses is reported in the consolidated balance sheets within the
Allowance for doubtful accounts.
Loan commitments—
Unfunded loan commitments are accounted for as either off-balance sheet instruments, or are carried at fairvalue on a recurring basis either as trading instruments or through election of the fair value option.
Loan commitments are generally accounted for in a manner consistent with the accounting for the loan
receivable upon funding. Where the loan receivable will be classified as a trading asset or will be elected for thefair value option, the loan commitment is also generally held at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in
the consolidated statements of income within Revenue—Net gain on trading. Loan commitment fees arerecognized as part of the fair value of the commitment.
For loan commitments where the loan will be held for the foreseeable future, Nomura recognizes anallowance for credit losses which is reported within Other liabilities—other in the consolidated balance sheets
which reflects management’s best estimate of probable losses incurred within the loan commitments which havebeen specifically identified as impaired. Loan commitment fees are generally deferred and recognized over theterm of the loan when funded as an adjustment to yield. If drawdown of the loan commitment is consideredremote, loan commitment fees are recognized over the commitment period as service revenue.
Payables and deposits—
Payables to customers include amounts payable on client securities transactions and are generally measured
at contractual amounts due.
Payables to other than customers include payables to brokers and dealers for securities not received from aseller by the settlement date and net payables arising from unsettled securities transactions. Amounts aremeasured at contractual amounts due. The net payable arising from unsettled securities transactions reported
within Payables to other than customers was ¥396,116 million and ¥nil as of March 31, 2012 and March 31,
2013, respectively.
Deposits received at banks represent amounts held on deposit within Nomura’s banking subsidiaries and aremeasured at contractual amounts due.
Office buildings, land, equipment and facilities—
Office buildings, land, equipment and facilities, held for use by Nomura are stated at cost, net ofaccumulated depreciation and amortization, except for land, which is stated at cost. Significant renewals andadditions are capitalized at cost. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are expensed as incurred in the
consolidated statements of income.

F-19

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table presents a breakdown of Office buildings, land, equipment and facilities as of March 31,
2012 and 2013.
Millions of yen
March 3120122013

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Office buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment and facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 594,146
235,995
60,840141,069
13,900¥ 93,800
104,320
52,644
161,469
16,008

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,045,950¥428,241

Depreciation and amortization charges are generally computed using the straight-line method and at rates
based on estimated useful lives of each asset according to general class, type of construction and use. The
estimated useful lives for significant asset classes are as follows:
Office buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment and facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5 to 50 years
2 to 20 years
Up to 5 years

Depreciation and amortization is reported within Non-interest expenses—Information processing andcommunications in the amount of ¥52,455 million, ¥54,083 million, ¥55,992 million, and in Non-interest
expenses—Occupancy and related depreciation in the amount of ¥23,132 million, and ¥46,489 million, and¥35,501 million for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Leases that involve real estate are classified as either operating or capital leases in accordance with
ASC 840 “Leases” (“ASC 840”). Rent expense relating to operating leases is recognized over the lease term on astraight-line basis. If the lease is classified as a capital lease, Nomura recognizes the real estate as an asset on the
consolidated balance sheets together with a lease obligation. The real estate is initially recognized at the lower of
its fair value or present value of minimum lease payments, and subsequently depreciated over its useful life on
straight-line basis. Where Nomura has certain involvement in the construction of real estate subject to a lease,
Nomura is deemed the owner of the construction project and recognizes the real estate on the consolidatedbalance sheets until construction is completed. At the end of the construction period the real estate is either
derecognized or continues to be recognized on the consolidated balance sheets in accordance with ASC 840,
depending on the extent of Nomura’s continued involvement with the real estate.
Long-lived assets, excluding goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If theestimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset is less than the carrying amount of the asset, aloss is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value.
Nomura recorded non-cash impairment charges of ¥1,532 million, and ¥3,135 million, and ¥5,455 million
substantially related to write-downs of software, office buildings, land, equipment, facilities, and other assets forthe years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The current year impairment was primarily
attributable to a decline in profitability of certain land and buildings. These losses are reported in the
consolidated statements of income within Non-interest expenses—Other and within Other in Nomura’s segment
reporting. The revised carrying values of these assets were based on the estimated fair value of the assets.
F-20

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Investments in equity securities—
Nomura holds minority stakes in the equity securities of unaffiliated Japanese financial institutions andcorporations in order to promote existing and potential business relationships. These companies will also often
have similar investments in Nomura. Such cross-holdings are a customary business practice in Japan and provide
a way for companies to manage shareholder relationships.
These investments, which Nomura refers to as being held for operating purposes, are carried at fair value
and reported within Other assets—Investments in equity securities in the consolidated balance sheets, withchanges in fair value reported within Revenue—Gain (loss) on investments in equity securities in the consolidated
statements of income. These investments comprise listed and unlisted equity securities in the amounts of¥69,552 million and ¥18,635 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2012 and ¥84,739 million and¥38,751 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2013.
Other non-trading debt and equity securities—
Certain non-trading subsidiaries within Nomura and an insurance subsidiary which was acquired during theyear ended March 31, 2012 hold debt securities and minority stakes in equity securities for non-trading purposes.
Non-trading securities held by non-trading subsidiaries are carried at fair value and reported within Other
assets—Non-trading debt securities and Other assets—Other in the consolidated balance sheets with changes infair value reported within Revenue—Other in the consolidated statements of income. Non-trading securities heldby the insurance subsidiary are also carried at fair value within Other assets—Non-trading debt securities andOther assets—Other in the consolidated balance sheets, and unrealized changes in fair value are reported net-oftax within Other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Realized
gains and losses on non-trading securities are reported within Revenue—Other in the consolidated statements ofincome.
Where the fair value of non-trading securities held by Nomura’s insurance subsidiary has declined below
amortized cost, these are assessed to determine whether the decline in fair value is other-than-temporary innature. Nomura considers quantitative and qualitative factors including the length of time and extent to which
fair value has been less than amortized cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and
Nomura’s intent and ability to hold the securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated
recovery in fair value. If an other-than-temporary impairment loss exists, for equity securities, the security is
written down to fair value, with the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost reported within
Revenue—Other in the consolidated statements of income. For debt securities, an other-than-temporary
impairment loss is also reported within Revenue—Other in the consolidated statements of income if Nomura
intends to sell the debt security or it is more-likely-than-not that Nomura will be required to sell the debt security
before recovery of amortized cost. If Nomura does not expect to sell or be required to sell the debt security, only
the credit loss component of an other-than-temporary impairment loss is reported in the consolidated statements
of income and any non-credit loss component reported within Other comprehensive income (loss) in the
consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
See Note 7 “Non-trading securities” for further information regarding these securities.
Short-term and long-term borrowings—
Short-term borrowings are defined as borrowings which are due on demand, which have a contractual
maturity of one year or less at issuance date, or which have a longer contractual maturity but which containfeatures outside of Nomura’s control that allows the investor to demand redemption within one year from
F-21

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
original issuance date. Short-term and long-term borrowings primarily consist of commercial paper, bankborrowings, and certain structured notes issued by Nomura and SPEs consolidated by Nomura, and financial
liabilities recognized in transfers of financial assets which are accounted for as financings rather than sales under
ASC 860 (“secured financing transactions”). Of these financial liabilities, certain structured notes and secured
financing transactions are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis through election of the fair value
option. Other short and long-term borrowings are primarily carried at amortized cost.
Structured notes—
Structured notes are debt securities which contain embedded features (often meeting the accounting
definition of a derivative) that alter the return to the investor from simply receiving a fixed or floating rate ofinterest to a return that depends upon some other variable(s) such as an equity or equity index, commodity price,foreign exchange rate, credit rating of a third party or more complex interest rate calculation.
All structured notes issued by Nomura on or after April 1, 2008 are carried at fair value on a recurring basis
through election of the fair value option. This blanket election for structured notes is made primarily to mitigate
the volatility in the consolidated statements of income caused by differences in the measurement basis forstructured notes and the derivatives used to risk manage those positions and to generally simplify the accounting
Nomura applies to these financial instruments.
Certain structured notes outstanding as of March 31, 2008 were already measured at fair value but others
continue to be accounted for by Nomura by bifurcating the embedded derivative from the associated debt hostcontract. The embedded derivative is accounted for at fair value and the debt host contract is accounted for atamortized cost.
Changes in the fair value of structured notes elected for the fair value option and bifurcated embedded
derivatives are reported within Revenue—Net gain on trading in the consolidated statements of income.
Income taxes—
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the expected future tax consequences of tax loss
carryforwards and temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities
based upon enacted tax laws and tax rates. Nomura recognizes deferred tax assets to the extent it believes that it
is more likely than not that a benefit will be realized. A valuation allowance is provided for tax benefits available
to Nomura that are not deemed more likely than not to be realized.
Nomura recognizes and measures unrecognized tax benefits based on Nomura’s estimate of the likelihood,based on the technical merits, that tax positions will be sustained upon examination based on the facts andcircumstances and information available at the end of each period. Nomura adjusts the level of unrecognized tax
benefits when there is more information available, or when an event occurs requiring a change. The reassessmentof unrecognized tax benefits could have a material impact on Nomura’s effective tax rate in the period in which it
occurs.
Stock-based and other compensation awards—
Stock-based awards issued by Nomura to senior management and other employees are classified as either
equity or liability awards depending on the terms of the award.

F-22

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Stock-based awards such as Stock Acquisition Rights (“SARs”) which are expected to be settled by thedelivery of the Company’s shares are classified as equity awards. For these awards, total compensation cost is
generally fixed at the grant date and measured using the grant-date fair value of the award, net of any amount theemployee is obligated to pay and estimated forfeitures.
Multi-Year Performance Deferral (“MYPD”) awards which contain certain performance conditions are alsoclassified as equity awards because these are expected to result in the issuance of SARs.
Stock-based awards such as Notional Stock Units (“NSUs”) and Collared Notional Stock Units (“CSUs”)
which are expected to be settled in cash are classified as liability awards. Other awards such as Notional Index
Units (“NIUs”) which are linked to a world stock index quoted by Morgan Stanley Capital International andwhich are expected to be cash settled are also effectively classified as liability awards. Liability awards are
remeasured to fair value at each balance sheet date, net of estimated forfeitures with the final measurement of
cumulative compensation cost equal to the settlement amount.
For both equity and liability awards, fair value is determined either by using option pricing models, themarket price of the Company’s shares or the price of the third party index, as appropriate. Compensation cost isrecognized in the consolidated statements of income over the requisite service period, which generally is equal tothe vesting period. For MYPD awards with performance conditions, compensation expense is also recognizedover the requisite service period to the extent it is probable that the performance conditions will be met. Wherean award has graded vesting, compensation expense is recognized using the accelerated recognition method.
See Note 16 “Deferred compensation plans” for further information regarding these types of awards.
Earnings per share—
The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the year. Diluted earnings per share reflects the assumed conversion of all dilutive securities based on themost advantageous conversion rate or exercise price available to the investors, and assuming conversion of
convertible debt under the if-converted method.
Cash and cash equivalents—
Nomura defines cash and cash equivalents as cash on hand and demand deposits with banks.
Goodwill and intangible assets—
Goodwill is recognized upon completion of a business combination as the difference between the purchaseprice and the fair value of the net assets acquired. Subsequent to initial recognition, goodwill is not amortized but
is tested for impairment at a reporting unit level during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more frequently
during interim periods if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Nomura’s reporting units areat one level below its business segments.
Nomura tests goodwill of each separate reporting unit by initially qualitatively assessing whether events andcircumstances indicate that it is more-likely-than-not (i.e. greater than 50%) that a reporting unit’s fair value is lessthan its carrying amount. If such assessment indicates fair value is not less than the carrying value, the reporting unit
is deemed not to be impaired and no further analysis is required. If it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value ofthe reporting unit is below its carrying value, a quantitative two-step impairment test is then performed.
F-23

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
In the first step, the current estimated fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying value,
including goodwill. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, then a second step is performed. In the second
step, the implied current fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is determined by comparing the fair value ofthe reporting unit to the fair value of the net assets of the reporting unit, as if the reporting unit were being
acquired in a business combination. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of goodwill exceeds
its implied current fair value.
Intangible assets not subject to amortization are also tested for impairment on an individual asset basis
during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more frequently during interim periods if events or circumstancesindicate there may be impairment. The current estimated fair value of the intangible asset is compared with its
carrying value. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its
estimated fair value. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over current estimated useful lives.
See Note 12 “Other assets—Other/Other liabilities” for further information regarding goodwill andintangible assets.
Nomura’s equity method investments are tested in their entirety for other-than-temporary impairment when
there is an indication of impairment. The underlying assets associated with the equity method investments,
including goodwill, are not tested separately for impairment.
Restructuring costs—
Costs associated with an exit activity are recognized at fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred.
Such costs include one-time termination benefits provided to employees, costs to terminate certain contracts andcosts to relocate employees. Termination benefits provided to employees as part of ongoing benefit arrangements
are recognized as liabilities at the earlier of the date an appropriately detailed restructuring plan is approved byregional executive management or the terms of the involuntary terminations are communicated to employees
potentially affected. Contractual termination benefits included in an employee’s contract of employment that istriggered by the occurrence of a specific event are recognized during the period in which it is probable that Nomura
has incurred a liability and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. A one-time termination benefit isestablished by a plan of termination that applies to a specified termination event and is recognized when an
appropriately detailed restructuring plan is approved by regional executive management and the terms of theinvoluntary terminations are communicated to those employees potentially affected by the restructuring.
New accounting pronouncements adopted during the current year—
The following new accounting pronouncements relevant to Nomura have been adopted during the year
ended March 31, 2013:
Goodwill impairment testing
In September 2011, the FASB issued amendments to ASC 350 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other”(“ASC 350”) through issuance of ASU 2011-08 “Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”). These
amendments simplify goodwill impairment testing by permitting an entity to initially assess qualitatively whether
it is necessary to perform the quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test required by ASC 350. If an entity
determines that it is not more-likely-than-not (i.e. greater than 50%) that a reporting unit’s fair value is less thanits carrying amount, the quantitative test is not required, whereas prior guidance required the quantitative test atleast on annual basis.
F-24

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
ASU 2011-08 is effective prospectively for goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted.
Nomura adopted ASU 2011-08 from April 1, 2012. Because the amendments only simplify when aquantitative test is required rather than change the quantitative test itself, these amendments have not had, and are
not expected to have, a material impact on these consolidated financial statements.
Presentation of comprehensive income
In June 2011, the FASB issued amendments to ASC 220 “Comprehensive Income” (“ASC 220”) throughissuance of ASU 2011-05 “Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”). These amendments
revise the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. The amendments
remove certain presentation options in ASC 220 and require entities to report components of comprehensive
income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate but consecutive statements.
ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12 “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to thePresentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in AccountingStandards Update No. 2011-05” (“ASU 2011-12”) which deferred certain aspects of ASU 2011-05.
Nomura adopted ASU 2011-05 from April 1, 2012 excluding those aspects that are deferred by
ASU 2011-12. Because these amendments only change how comprehensive income is presented within these
consolidated financial statements rather than changing whether an item must be reported in other comprehensive
income or when an item of other comprehensive income is reclassified to earnings, these amendments have not
had, and are not expected to have, a material impact on these consolidated financial statements.
Future accounting developments—
The following new accounting pronouncements relevant to Nomura will be adopted in future periods:
Testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02 “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment”(“ASU 2012-02”). These amendments simplify indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment testing by permitting
an entity to initially assess qualitatively whether it is necessary to perform the current quantitative impairment test
required by ASC 350. If an entity determines that it is not more-likely-than-not (i.e. greater than 50%) that anindefinite-lived intangible asset fair value is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative test is not required.
ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after
September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted.
Nomura will adopt ASU 2012-02 from April 1, 2013. Because the amendments only simplify when aquantitative test is required rather than change the quantitative test itself, they are not expected to have a material
impact on these consolidated financial statements.

F-25

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities
In December 2011, the FASB issued amendments to ASC 210-20 “Balance Sheet—Offsetting”(“ASC 210-20”) through issuance of ASU 2011-11 “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities”(“ASU 2011-11”), and issued a related amendment in January 2013 through ASU 2013-01 “Clarifying the Scopeof Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2013-01”). These amendments require an entity todisclose information about rights of offset and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements tounderstand the effect or potential effect of those arrangements on its financial position.
ASU 2011-11 and ASU 2013-01 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning on or after January 1, 2013 with required disclosures made retrospectively for all comparative periods
presented.
Nomura will adopt ASU 2011-11 and ASU 2013-01 from April 1, 2013. Because these amendments only
require enhanced disclosures rather than change the guidance around when assets and liabilities can be offset,
they are not expected to have a material impact on these consolidated financial statements.
Reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income
In February 2013, the FASB issued amendments to ASC 220-10 “Comprehensive Income—Overall”
through issuance of ASU 2013-02 “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income” (“ASU 2013-02”). The amendments require an entity to disclose additional information about amounts
reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income, including changes in accumulated othercomprehensive income balances by component of accumulated other comprehensive income and information
about significant items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 supersedes
the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASU
2011-05 and ASU 2011-12.
ASU 2013-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted.
Nomura will adopt ASU 2013-02 from April 1, 2013. Because these amendments only require changes inpresentation and disclosure of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income rather thanchange the guidance regarding recognition of such amounts, they are not expected to have a material impact onthese consolidated financial statements.
Release of cumulative translation adjustment amounts
In March 2013, the FASB issued amendments to ASC 810-10 “Consolidation—Overall” and ASC 830-30“Foreign Currency Matters—Translation of Financial Statements” through issuance of ASU 2013-05 “Parent’s
Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups ofAssets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity” (“ASU 2013-05”). The amendments
resolve diversity in practice about whether guidance in ASC 810 or ASC 830 applies to the release of cumulativetranslation adjustment (“CTA”) amounts into earnings when a parent sells part or all of its investment in aforeign entity (or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary).
ASU 2013-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2013 with early adoption permitted.
F-26

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Nomura currently plans to adopt ASU 2013-05 from April 1, 2014 and is currently evaluating the potential
impact it may have on these consolidated financial statements.
Determination of investment company status
In June 2013, the FASB issued amendments to ASC 946 through issuance of ASU 2013-08 “Amendments to
the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU 2013-08”). These amendments change thedefinition of an investment company, which is an entity that is required to measure its investments at fair value,
including controlling financial interests in investees that are not investment companies. ASU 2013-08 also
requires an investment company to measure noncontrolling ownership interests in other investment companies atfair value rather than using the equity method of accounting and also introduces certain additional disclosures,
including information about financial support provided, or contractually required to be provided, by aninvestment company to any of its investees.
ASU 2013-08 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2013 with early adoption not permitted.
Nomura will adopt ASU 2013-08 from April 1, 2014 and is currently evaluating the potential impact it may
have on these consolidated financial statements.
2. Fair value measurements:
The fair value of financial instruments
A significant amount of Nomura’s financial instruments are carried at fair value. Financial assets carried atfair value on a recurring basis are reported in the consolidated balance sheets within Trading assets and private
equity investments, Loans and receivables, Collateralized agreements and Other assets. Financial liabilities
carried at fair value on a recurring basis are reported within Trading liabilities, Short-term borrowings, Payables
and deposits, Collateralized financing, Long-term borrowings and Other liabilities.
Other financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, where theprimary measurement basis is not fair value but where fair value is used in specific circumstances after initialrecognition, such as to measure impairment.
In all cases, fair value is determined in accordance with ASC 820 which defines fair value as the amountthat would be exchanged to sell a financial asset or transfer a financial liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. It assumes that the transaction occurs in Nomura’s principal market,
or in the absence of the principal market, the most advantageous market for the relevant financial assets orfinancial liabilities.
Fair value is usually determined on an individual financial instrument basis consistent with the unit ofaccount of the financial instrument. However, certain financial instruments managed on a portfolio basis arevalued as a portfolio, namely based on the price that would be received to sell a net long position (i.e. a net
financial asset) or transfer a net short position (i.e. a net financial liability) consistent with how market
participants would price the net risk exposure at the measurement date.
Financial assets carried at fair value also include investments in certain funds where, as a practical
expedient, fair value is determined on the basis of net asset value per share (“NAV per share”) if the NAV pershare is calculated in accordance with certain industry standard principles.
Increases and decreases in the fair value of assets and liabilities will significantly impact Nomura’s position,
performance, liquidity and capital resources. As explained below, valuation techniques applied contain inherent
F-27

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
uncertainties and Nomura is unable to predict the accurate impact of future developments in the market. Where
appropriate, Nomura uses economic hedging strategies to mitigate its risk, although these hedges are also subject
to unpredictable movements in the market.

Valuation methodology for financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis
The fair value of financial instruments is based on quoted market prices including market indices, broker or dealer
quotations or an estimation by management of the expected exit price under current market conditions. Various
financial instruments, including cash instruments and over-the-counter (“OTC”) contracts, have bid and offer pricesthat are observable in the market. These are measured at the point within the bid-offer range which best represents
Nomura’s estimate of fair value. Where quoted market prices or broker or dealer quotations are not available, prices for
similar instruments or valuation pricing models are considered in the determination of fair value.
Where quoted prices are available in active markets, no valuation adjustments are taken to modify the fairvalue of assets or liabilities marked using such prices. Other instruments may be measured using valuation
techniques, such as valuation pricing models incorporating observable parameters, unobservable parameters or a
combination of both. Valuation pricing models use parameters which would be considered by market participantsin valuing similar financial instruments.
Valuation pricing models and their underlying assumptions impact the amount and timing of unrealized andrealized gains and losses recognized, and the use of different valuation pricing models or underlying assumptions
could produce different financial results. Valuation uncertainty results from a variety of factors, including thevaluation technique or model selected, the quantitative assumptions used within the valuation model, the inputs
into the model, as well as other factors. Valuation adjustments are used to reflect the assessment of thisuncertainty. Common valuation adjustments include model reserves, credit adjustments, close-out adjustments,and other appropriate instrument-specific adjustments, such as those to reflect transfer or sale restrictions.
The level of adjustments is largely judgmental and is based on an assessment of the factors that management
believe other market participants would use in determining the fair value of similar financial instruments. The
type of adjustments taken, the methodology for the calculation of these adjustments, and the inputs for thesecalculations are reassessed periodically to reflect current market practice and the availability of new information.
For example, the fair value of certain financial instruments includes adjustments for credit risk; both withregards to counterparty credit risk on positions held and Nomura’s own creditworthiness on positions issued.
Credit risk on financial assets is significantly mitigated by credit enhancements such as collateral and netting
arrangements. Any net credit exposure is measured using available and applicable inputs for the relevant
counterparty. The same approach is used to measure the credit exposure on Nomura’s financial liabilities as isused to measure counterparty credit risk on Nomura’s financial assets.
Such valuation pricing models are calibrated to the market on a regular basis and inputs used are adjusted
for current market conditions and risks. The Global Model Validation Group (“MVG”) within Nomura’s Risk
Management Department reviews pricing models and assesses model appropriateness and consistency
independently of the front office. The model reviews consider a number of factors about a model’s suitability forvaluation and sensitivity of a particular product. Valuation models are calibrated to the market on a periodic basis
by comparison to observable market pricing, comparison with alternative models, and analysis of risk profiles.
As explained above, any changes in fixed income, equity, foreign exchange and commodity markets canimpact Nomura’s estimates of fair value in the future, potentially affecting trading gains and losses. Where
financial contracts have longer maturity dates, Nomura’s estimates of fair value may involve greater subjectivity
due to the lack of transparent market data.
F-28

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Fair value hierarchy
All financial instruments measured at fair value, including those carried at fair value using the fair value
option, have been categorized into a three-level hierarchy (“fair value hierarchy”) based on the transparency ofvaluation inputs used by Nomura to estimate fair value. A financial instrument is classified in the fair value
hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the financial
instrument. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows, with Level 1 representing the mosttransparent inputs and Level 3 representing the least transparent inputs:
Level 1:
Unadjusted quoted prices for identical financial instruments in active markets accessible by Nomura at themeasurement date.
Level 2:
Quoted prices in inactive markets or prices containing other inputs which are observable, either directly or
indirectly. Valuation techniques using observable inputs reflect assumptions used by market participants inpricing financial instruments and are based on data obtained from independent market sources at themeasurement date.
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement of the financial instrument. Valuation
techniques using unobservable inputs reflect management’s assumptions about the estimates used by othermarket participants in valuing similar financial instruments. These valuation techniques are developed based on
the best available information at the measurement date.
The availability of inputs observable in the market varies by product and can be affected by a variety offactors. Significant factors include, but are not restricted to the prevalence of similar products in the market,
especially for customized products, how established the product is in the market, for example, whether it is a new
product or is relatively mature, and the reliability of information provided in the market which would depend, forexample, on the frequency and volume of current data. A period of significant change in the market may reduce
the availability of observable data. Under such circumstances, financial instruments may be reclassified into alower level in the fair value hierarchy.
Significant judgments used in determining the classification of financial instruments include the nature of
the market in which the product would be traded, the underlying risks, the type and liquidity of market data
inputs and the nature of observed transactions for similar instruments.
Where valuation models include the use of parameters which are less observable or unobservable in themarket, significant management judgment is used in establishing fair value. The valuations for Level 3 financial
instruments, therefore, involve a greater degree of judgment than those valuations for Level 1 or Level 2
financial instruments.
Certain criteria management use to determine whether a market is active or inactive include the number oftransactions, the frequency that pricing is updated by other market participants, the variability of price quotes
among market participants, and the amount of publicly available information.
F-29

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables present the amounts of Nomura’s financial instruments measured at fair value on arecurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 within the fair value hierarchy.
Billions of yen
March 31, 2012

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets:Trading assets and private equity investments(2)Equities(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Private equity investments(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japanese government securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japanese agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes . . . .
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) and other(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 745
—
2,143
—
3,072
—
—
—
—
—
95

¥ 1,194
—
—
151
1,185
1,276
135
2,010
1
103
85

¥ 125
202
—
10
37
62
8
5
91
20
9

Total trading assets and private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,055

6,140

Derivative assets(5)Equity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Netting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

584
14
0
0
1
—

937
18,850
1,650
1,229
3
—

Counterparty
andCash Collateral
Netting(1)¥Balance as ofMarch 31, 2012

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

¥ 2,064
202
2,143
161
4,294
1,338
143
2,015
92
123
189

569

—

12,764

82
57
214
131
0
—

—
—
—
—
—
(22,392)

1,603
18,921
1,864
1,360
4
(22,392)

Total derivative assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

599

22,669484(22,392)

1,360

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥6,654¥28,809¥1,053¥(22,392)¥ 14,124

Loans and receivables(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized agreements(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets
Non-trading debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—

447
752

11
—

—
—

458
752

680
216

177
6

6
72

—
—

863
294

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥7,550¥30,191¥1,142¥(22,392)¥ 16,491

Liabilities:
Trading liabilities
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japanese government securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank and corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) and other(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 579
2,624
1,800
—
—
—
—
43

¥

¥

¥

¥

Total trading liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,046

1,140

1

—

6,187

Derivative liabilities(5)Equity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Netting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

617
12
0
0
1
—

1,016
18,708
1,727
1,297
4
—

68
96
225
113
0
—

—
—
—
—
—
(22,576)

1,701
18,816
1,952
1,410
5
(22,576)

413
—
490
233
1
0
0
3

0
—
—
1
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

992
2,624
2,290
234
1
0
0
46

Total derivative liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

630

22,752502(22,576)

1,308

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥5,676¥23,892¥ 503¥(22,576)¥ 7,495

Short-term borrowings(8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payables and deposits(9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized financing(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings(8)(10)(11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities(12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—
—
154
93

153
0
307
1,549
4

0
(0)
—
(13)
—

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥5,923¥25,905

¥ 490

F-30

—
—
—
—
—
¥(22,576)

153
(0)
307
1,690
97
¥ 9,742NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Billions of yen
March 31, 2013

Level 1

Level 2

Assets:Trading assets and private equity investments(2)Equities(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥1,008 ¥ 720
Private equity investments(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
——Japanese government securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,331—
Japanese agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—72
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,574
1,466
Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes . . .
—1,375
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—161
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—2,720
Real estate-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
——Collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) and other(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—138
Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
144
45
Total trading assets and private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,057
6,697
Derivative assets(5)Equity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
723
1,058
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
421,621Credit contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
01,706
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—2,094
Commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10Netting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
——Total derivative assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
728
26,479Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥8,785 ¥33,176
Loans and receivables(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—521
Collateralized agreements(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—998
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-trading debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
409
508
Other(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
172
15
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥9,366 ¥35,218
Liabilities:
Trading liabilities
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 922 ¥87Japanese government securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,151—Japanese agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—0Foreign government, agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,627
477
Bank and corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—288
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—1
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—1
Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
40
12Total trading liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,740
866
Derivative liabilities(5)Equity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
827
1,118
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
221,312Credit contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
01,871
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
01,994
Commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
1
Netting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
——Total derivative liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
830
26,296
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥6,570 ¥27,162
Short-term borrowings(8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—73
Payables and deposits(9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—0(7)
Collateralized financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—265(8)(10)(11)Long-term borrowings..................................
114
1,263
Other liabilities(12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39
11
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥6,723 ¥28,774

F-31

Level 3

Counterparty
andCash Collateral
Netting(1)Balance as ofMarch 31, 2013

¥129
87
—
0
91
69
6
4
68
12
13
479

¥

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

¥ 1,857
87
3,331
72
5,131
1,444
167
2,724
68
150
202
15,233

76
148
133
11
0
—
368
¥847
3
—

—
—
—
—
—
(25,684)(25,684)¥(25,684)
—
—

1,857
21,773
1,839
2,105
1
(25,684)
1,891¥ 17,124
524
998

4
60
¥914

—
—
¥(25,684)

921
247¥ 19,814

¥ 0
—
—
—
0
—
—
—
0

¥

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

¥ 1,009
2,151
0
3,104
288
1
1
52
6,606

71
202
108
14
0
—
395
¥395
4
1
—
222
0
¥622

—
—
—
—
—
(25,636)(25,636)¥(25,636)—————¥(25,636)

2,016
21,516
1,979
2,008
2
(25,636)
1,885¥ 8,491
77
1
265
1,599
50
¥ 10,483

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)(1) Represents the amount offset under counterparty netting of derivative assets and liabilities as well as cash collateral netting against net
derivatives.
(2) Includes investments in certain funds measured at fair value on the basis of NAV per share as a practical expedient.
(3) Includes equity investments that would have been accounted for under the equity method had Nomura not chosen to elect the fair value
option.
(4) Includes collateralized loan obligations (“CLO”) and asset-backed securities (“ABS”) such as those secured on credit card loans, autoloans and student loans.
(5) Each derivative classification includes derivatives referencing multiple risk components. For example, interest rate contracts include
complex derivatives referencing interest rate risk as well as foreign exchange risk or other factors such as prepayment rates. Credit
contracts include credit default swaps as well as derivatives referencing corporate and government debt securities.
(6) Includes loans for which the fair value option is elected.
(7) Includes collateralized agreements or collateralized financing for which the fair value option is elected.
(8) Includes structured notes for which the fair value option is elected.
(9) Includes embedded derivatives bifurcated from deposits received at banks. If unrealized gains are greater than unrealized losses, deposits
are reduced by the excess amount.
(10) Includes embedded derivatives bifurcated from issued structured notes. If unrealized gains are greater than unrealized losses, borrowings
are reduced by the excess amount.
(11) Includes liabilities recognized from secured financing transactions that are accounted for as financings rather than sales. Nomura elected
the fair value option for these liabilities.
(12) Includes loan commitments for which the fair value option is elected.

Valuation techniques by major class of financial instrument
The valuation techniques used by Nomura to estimate fair value for major classes of financial instruments,
together with the significant inputs which determine classification in the fair value hierarchy, are as follows.
Equities and equity securities reported within Other assets—Equities and equity securities reported within
Other assets include direct holdings of both listed and unlisted equity securities, and fund investments. Listed
equity securities are valued using quoted prices for identical securities from active markets where available.
These valuations should be in line with market practice and therefore can be based on bid/offer prices asapplicable or mid-market prices. Nomura determines whether the market is active depending on the sufficiency
and frequency of trading activity. Where these securities are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy, novaluation adjustments are made to fair value. Listed equity securities traded in inactive markets are also generally
valued using the exchange price and are classified in Level 2. Whilst rare in practice, Nomura may apply a
discount or liquidity adjustment to the exchange price of a listed equity security traded in an inactive market if
the exchange price is not considered to be an appropriate representation of fair value. These adjustments are
determined by individual security and are not determined or influenced by the size of holding. The amount ofsuch adjustments made to listed equity securities traded in inactive markets was ¥nil as of March 31, 2012 and2013. Unlisted equity securities are valued using the same methodology as private equity investments described
below and are usually classified in Level 3 because significant valuation inputs such as yields and liquidity
discounts are unobservable. As a practical expedient, fund investments are generally valued using NAV per share
where available. Publicly traded mutual funds which are valued using a daily NAV per share are classified in
Level 1. Investments in funds where Nomura has the ability to redeem its investment with the investee at NAV
per share as of the balance sheet date or within the near term are classified as Level 2. Investments in funds
where Nomura does not have the ability to redeem in the near term or does not know when it can redeem areclassified in Level 3. The Direct Capitalization Method (“DCM”) is used as a valuation technique for certain
equity investments in real estate funds, with net operating income used as a measure of financial performance
which is then applied to a capitalization rate dependent on the characteristics of the underlying real estate. Equity
investments which are valued using DCM valuation techniques are generally classified in Level 3 sinceobservable market capitalization rates are usually not available for identical or sufficiently similar real estate tothat held within the real estate funds being valued. Nomura refined the fair value measurement of certain
investments in unlisted equity securities reported within Other assets during the year ended March 31, 2013.
F-32

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Private equity investments—The valuation of unlisted private equity investments requires significant
management judgment because the investments, by their nature, have little or no price transparency. Private
equity investments are initially carried at cost as an approximation of fair value. Adjustments to carrying value
are made if there is third party evidence of a change in value. Adjustments are also made, in the absence of third
party transactions, if it is determined that the expected exit price of the investment is different from carrying
value. In reaching that determination, Nomura primarily uses either a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) or market
multiple valuation technique. A DCF valuation technique incorporates estimated future cash flows to begenerated from the underlying investee, as adjusted for an appropriate growth rate discounted at a weighted
average cost of capital (“WACC”). Market multiple valuation techniques include comparables such as Enterprise
Value/earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EV/EBITDA”) ratios, Price/Earnings(“PE”) ratios, Price/Book ratios, Price/Embedded Value ratios and other multiples based on relationships
between numbers reported in the financial statements of the investee and the price of comparable companies. A
liquidity discount may also be applied to either a DCF or market multiple valuation to reflect the specificcharacteristics of the investee. Where possible these valuations are compared with the operating cash flows andfinancial performance of the investee or properties relative to budgets or projections, price/earnings data forsimilar quoted companies, trends within sectors and/or regions and any specific rights or terms associated with
the investment, such as conversion features and liquidation preferences. Private equity investments are generallyclassified in Level 3 since the valuation inputs such as those mentioned above are usually unobservable.
Government, agency and municipal securities—Japanese and other G7 government securities are valued
using quoted market prices, executable broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources. These
securities are traded in active markets and therefore are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. NonG7 government securities, agency securities and municipal securities are valued using similar pricing sources but
are generally classified in Level 2 as they are traded in inactive markets. Certain non-G7 securities may beclassified in Level 1 because they trade in active markets. Certain securities may be classified in Level 3 because
they trade infrequently and there is not sufficient information from comparable securities to classify them inLevel 2. These are valued using DCF valuation techniques which include significant unobservable inputs such as
credit spreads of the issuer.
Bank and corporate debt securities—The fair value of bank and corporate debt securities is primarily
determined using DCF valuation techniques but also using broker or dealer quotations and recent market
transactions of identical or similar debt securities, if available. Consideration is given to the nature of the broker
and dealer quotations, namely whether these are indicative or executable, the number of available quotations andhow these quotations compare to any available recent market activity or alternative pricing sources. The
significant valuation inputs used for DCF valuations are yield curves, asset swap spreads, recovery rates andcredit spreads of the issuer. Bank and corporate debt securities are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy because these valuation inputs are usually observable or market-corroborated. Certain bank andcorporate debt securities will be classified in Level 3 because they are traded infrequently and there isinsufficient information from comparable securities to classify them in Level 2, or credit spreads of the issuer
used in DCF valuations are unobservable.
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and Residential mortgage-backed securities(“RMBS”)—The fair value of CMBS and RMBS is primarily determined using DCF valuation techniques but
also using broker or dealer quotations and recent market transactions of identical or similar securities, if
available. Consideration is given to the nature of the broker and dealer quotations, namely whether these areindicative or executable, the number of available quotations and how these quotations compare to any available
recent market activity or alternative pricing sources. The significant valuation inputs include yields, prepayment
rates, default probabilities and loss severities. CMBS and RMBS securities are generally classified in Level 2
because these valuation inputs are observable or market-corroborated. Certain CMBS and RMBS positions will
F-33

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
be classified in Level 3 because they are traded infrequently and there is insufficient information fromcomparable securities to classify them in Level 2, or one or more of the significant valuation inputs used in DCF
valuations are unobservable.
Real estate-backed securities—The fair value of real estate-backed securities is estimated using broker ordealer quotations, recent market transactions or by reference to a comparable market index. Consideration is
given to the nature of the broker and dealer quotations, namely whether these are indicative or executable, thenumber of available quotations and how these quotations compare to any available recent market activity oralternative pricing sources. Where all significant inputs are observable, the securities will be classified in Level
2. For certain securities, no direct pricing sources or comparable securities or indices may be available. These
securities are valued using DCF or DCM valuation techniques and are classified in Level 3 as the valuation
includes significant unobservable valuation inputs such as yields, prepayment rates, default probabilities, loss
severities and capitalization rates.
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) and other—The fair value of CDOs is primarily determined using
DCF valuation techniques but also using broker or dealer quotations and recent market transactions of identicalor similar securities, if available. Consideration is given to the nature of the broker and dealer quotations, namely
whether these are indicative or executable, the number of available quotations and how these quotations compare
to any available recent market activity or alternative pricing sources. The significant valuation inputs used
include market spread data for each credit rating, prepayment rates, default probabilities and loss severities.
CDOs are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because these valuation inputs are observableor market-corroborated. CDOs will be classified in Level 3 where one or more of the significant valuation inputs
used in the DCF valuations are unobservable.
Investment trust funds and other—Investment trust funds are generally valued using NAV per share.
Publicly traded funds which are valued using a daily NAV per share are classified in Level 1. For funds that are
not publicly traded but Nomura has the ability to redeem its investment with the investee at NAV per share on
the balance sheet date or within the near term, the investments are classified in Level 2. Investments where
Nomura does not have the ability to redeem in the near term or does not know when it can redeem are classified
in Level 3. The fair value of certain other investments reported within Investment trust funds and other isdetermined using DCF valuation techniques. These investments are classified in Level 3 as the valuation includes
significant unobservable valuation inputs such as credit spreads of issuer and correlation.
Derivatives—Equity contracts—Nomura enters into both exchange-traded and OTC equity derivativetransactions such as index and equity options, equity basket options and index and equity swaps. The fair valueof exchange-traded equity derivatives is primarily determined using an unadjusted exchange price. These
derivatives are generally traded in active markets and therefore are classified in Level 1 of the fair value
hierarchy. Where these derivatives are not valued at the exchange price due to timing differences, these areclassified in Level 2. The fair value of OTC equity derivatives is determined through option models such as
Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation. The significant valuation inputs used include equity prices, dividend
yields, volatilities and correlations. Valuation adjustments are also made to model valuations in order to reflect
counterparty credit risk on derivative assets and Nomura’s own creditworthiness on derivative liabilities. OTC
equity derivatives are generally classified in Level 2 because all significant valuation inputs and adjustments areobservable or market-corroborated. Certain longer-dated or more complex equity derivatives are classified in
Level 3 where dividend yield, volatility or correlation valuation inputs are significant and unobservable.
Derivatives—Interest rate contracts—Nomura enters into both exchange-traded and OTC interest rate
derivative transactions such as interest rate swaps, currency swaps, interest rate options, forward rate agreements,
F-34

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
swaptions, caps and floors. The fair value of exchange-traded interest rate derivatives is primarily determined using
an unadjusted exchange price. These derivatives are traded in active markets and therefore are classified in Level 1of the fair value hierarchy. Where these derivatives are not valued at the exchange price due to timing differences,
they are classified in Level 2. The fair value of OTC interest rate derivatives is determined through DCF valuation
techniques as well as option models such as Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation. The significant valuation
inputs used include interest rates, forward foreign exchange (“FX”) rates, volatilities and correlations. Valuation
adjustments are also made to model valuations in order to reflect counterparty credit risk on derivative assets andNomura’s own creditworthiness on derivative liabilities. OTC interest rate derivatives are generally classified in
Level 2 because all significant valuation inputs and adjustments are observable or market-corroborated. Certain
longer-dated or more complex OTC interest rate derivatives are classified in Level 3 where forward FX rate, interest
rate, volatility or correlation valuation inputs are significant and unobservable.
Derivatives—Credit contracts—Nomura enters into OTC credit derivative transactions such as credit
default swaps and credit options on single names, indices or baskets of assets. The fair value of OTC credit
derivatives is determined through DCF valuation techniques as well as option models such as Black-Scholes andMonte Carlo simulation. The significant valuation inputs used include interest rates, credit spreads, recovery
rates, default probabilities, volatilities and correlations. Valuation adjustments are also made to model valuations
in order to reflect counterparty credit risk on derivative assets and Nomura’s own creditworthiness on derivative
liabilities. OTC credit derivatives are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because all
significant valuation inputs and adjustments are observable or market-corroborated. Certain longer-dated or more
complex OTC credit derivatives are classified in Level 3 where credit spread, recovery rate, volatility or
correlation valuation inputs are significant and unobservable.
Derivatives—Foreign exchange contracts—Nomura enters into both exchange-traded and OTC foreignexchange derivative transactions such as foreign exchange forwards and currency options. The fair value of
exchange-traded foreign exchange derivatives is primarily determined using an unadjusted exchange price. These
derivatives are traded in active markets and therefore are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Where
these derivatives are not valued at the exchange price due to timing differences, they are classified in Level 2.
The fair value of OTC foreign exchange derivatives is determined through DCF valuation techniques as well as
option models such as Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation. The significant valuation inputs used include
interest rates, forward FX rates, spot FX rates and volatilities. Valuation adjustments are also made to model
valuations in order to reflect counterparty credit risk on derivative assets and Nomura’s own creditworthiness onderivative liabilities. OTC foreign exchange derivatives are generally classified in Level 2 because all significant
valuation inputs and adjustments are observable or market-corroborated. Certain longer-dated foreign exchange
derivatives are classified in Level 3 where forward FX rate or volatility valuation inputs are significant andunobservable.
Derivatives—Commodity contracts—Nomura enters into OTC commodity derivative transactions such ascommodity swaps, commodity forwards and commodity options. The fair value of OTC commodity derivatives
is determined through DCF valuation techniques as well as option models such as Black-Scholes and Monte
Carlo simulation. The significant valuation inputs used include commodity prices, interest rates, volatilities andcorrelations. Valuation adjustments are also made to model valuations in order to reflect counterparty credit risk
on derivative assets and Nomura’s own creditworthiness on derivative liabilities. OTC commodity derivatives are
generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because these valuation inputs and adjustments areobservable or market-corroborated.
During the year ended March 31, 2012, Nomura began using the Overnight Indexed Swap (“OIS”) curve
rather than the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) curve to estimate the fair value of certain
F-35

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
collateralized derivative contracts. During the quarter ended December 31, 2012, Nomura further refined thisvaluation methodology to incorporate additional features of the collateral. Nomura believes the changes
introduced are more representative of how market participants in the principal market for these derivatives would
determine fair value. The impact of this change on the fair value measurements applied to these derivatives was aloss of ¥11 billion during the period through to March 31, 2013. As part of its continuous review of the valuation
methodologies applied by market participants, Nomura may further refine its valuation methodology ofderivatives in future periods.
Loans—The fair value of loans carried at fair value either as trading assets or through election of the fairvalue option is primarily determined using DCF valuation techniques as quoted prices are typically not available.
The significant valuation inputs used are similar to those used in the valuation of corporate debt securities
described above. Loans are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because all significant
valuation inputs are observable. Certain loans, however, are classified in Level 3 because they are tradedinfrequently and there is not sufficient information from comparable securities to classify them as Level 2 orcredit spreads of the issuer used in DCF valuations are significant and unobservable.
Collateralized agreements and Collateralized financing—The primary types of collateralized agreement andfinancing transactions carried at fair value are resale and repurchase agreements elected for the fair value option.
The fair value of these financial instruments is primarily determined using DCF valuation techniques. The
significant valuation inputs used include interest rates and collateral funding spreads such as general collateral or
special rates. Resale and repurchase agreements are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy
because these valuation inputs are usually observable.
Non-trading debt securities—These are debt securities held by certain non-trading subsidiaries in the group
and are valued and classified in the fair value hierarchy using the same valuation techniques used for other debt
securities classified as government, agency and municipal bonds and bank and corporate debt securities
described above.
Short-term and long-term borrowings (“Structured notes”)—Structured notes are debt securities issued by
Nomura or by consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) which contain embedded features that alter the
return to the investor from simply receiving a fixed or floating rate of interest to a return that depends upon someother variables, such as an equity or equity index, commodity price, foreign exchange rate, credit rating of a third
party or a more complex interest rate (i.e., an embedded derivative). The fair value of structured notes is
estimated using a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability if available, and where not available,using a mixture of valuation techniques that use the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset,
quoted prices for similar liabilities, similar liabilities when traded as assets, or an internal model which combines
DCF valuation techniques and option pricing models, depending on the nature of the embedded features within
the structured note. Where an internal model is used, Nomura estimates the fair value of both the underlying debt
instrument and the embedded derivative components. The significant valuation inputs used to estimate the fairvalue of the debt instrument component include yield curves and prepayment rates. The significant valuation
inputs used to estimate the fair value of the embedded derivative component are the same as those used for the
relevant type of freestanding OTC derivative discussed above. A valuation adjustment is also made to the entire
structured note in order to reflect Nomura’s own creditworthiness. To reflect Nomura’s own creditworthiness, thefair value of structured notes includes an adjustment of ¥37 billion and ¥8 billion as of March 31, 2012 and 2013,
respectively. This adjustment is determined based on recent observable secondary market transactions andexecutable broker quotes involving Nomura debt instruments and is therefore typically treated as a Level 2
valuation input. Structured notes are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as all significant
valuation inputs and adjustments are observable. Where any unobservable inputs are significant, such asvolatilities and correlations used to estimate the fair value of the embedded derivative component, structured
notes are classified in Level 3.
F-36

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Long-term borrowings (“Secured financing transactions”)—Secured financing transactions are liabilities
recognized when a transfer of a financial asset does not meet the criteria for sales accounting under ASC 860 andtherefore the transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing. These liabilities are valued using the samevaluation techniques that are applied to the transferred financial assets which remain on the consolidated balance
sheets and are therefore classified in the same level in the fair value hierarchy as the transferred financial assets.
These liabilities do not provide general recourse to Nomura and therefore no adjustment is made to reflect
Nomura’s own creditworthiness.
Valuation processes
In order to ensure the appropriateness of any fair value measurement of a financial instrument used withinthese consolidated financial statements, including those classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy,
Nomura operates a governance framework which mandates determination or validation of a fair value
measurement by control and support functions independent of the trading businesses assuming the risk of thefinancial instrument. Such functions within Nomura with direct responsibility for either defining, implementing
or maintaining valuation policies and procedures are as follows:•

The Product Control Valuations Group (“PCVG”) within Nomura’s Finance Department has primary
responsibility for determining and implementing valuation policies and procedures in connection withdetermination of fair value measurements. In particular, this group will ensure that valuation policies are
documented for each type of financial instrument in accordance with U.S. GAAP. While it is the
responsibility of market makers and investment professionals in our trading businesses to price financial
instruments, the PCVG are responsible for independently verifying or validating these prices. In theevent of a difference in opinion or where the estimate of fair value requires judgment, the valuation usedwithin these consolidated financial statements is made by senior managers independent of the tradingbusinesses. This group reports to the Global Head of Product Control and ultimately to the Chief
Financial Officer (“CFO”);•

The Accounting Policy Group within Nomura’s Finance Department defines the group’s accounting
policies and procedures in accordance with U.S. GAAP, including those associated with determinationof fair value under ASC 820 and other relevant U.S. GAAP pronouncements. This group reports to the
Global Head of Accounting Policy and ultimately to the CFO; and•The MVG within Nomura’s Risk Management Department validates the appropriateness andconsistency of pricing models used to determine fair value measurements independently of those who
design and build the models. This group reports to the Global Head of Market and Quantitative Risk.

The fundamental components of this governance framework over valuation processes within Nomura
particularly as it relates to Level 3 financial instruments are the procedures in place for independent priceverification, pricing model validation and revenue substantiation.
Independent price verification processes
The key objective of the independent price verification processes within Nomura is to verify theappropriateness of fair value measurements applied to all financial instruments within Nomura. In applying thesecontrol processes, observable inputs are used whenever possible and when unobservable inputs are necessary, theprocesses seek to ensure the valuation technique and inputs are appropriate, reasonable and consistently applied.

F-37

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The independent price verification processes aim to verify the fair value of all positions to external levels ona regular basis. The process will involve obtaining data such as trades, marks and prices from internal andexternal sources and examining the impact of marking the internal positions at the external prices. Margin
disputes within the collateral process will also be investigated to determine if there is any impact on valuations.
Where third-party pricing information sourced from brokers, dealers and consensus pricing services is usedas part of the price verification process, consideration is given as to whether that information reflects actual
recent market transactions or prices at which transactions involving identical or similar financial instruments are
currently executable. If such transactions or prices are not available, the financial instrument will generally beclassified as Level 3.
Where there is a lack of observable market information around the inputs used in a fair value measurement,
then the PCVG and the MVG will assess the inputs used for reasonableness considering available information
including comparable products, surfaces, curves and past trades. Additional valuation adjustments may be taken
for the uncertainty in the inputs used, such as correlation and where appropriate trading desks may be asked to
execute trades to evidence market levels.
Model review and validation
For more complex financial instruments pricing models are used to determine fair value measurements. The
MVG performs an independent model approval process which incorporates a review of the model assumptions
across a diverse set of parameters. Considerations include:•

Scope of the model (different financial instruments may require different but consistent pricing
approaches);•

Mathematical and financial assumptions;•

Full or partial independent benchmarking along with boundary and stability tests, numericalconvergence, calibration quality and stability;•

Model integration within Nomura’s trading and risk systems;•

Calculation of risk numbers and risk reporting; and•Hedging strategies/practical use of the model.

New models are reviewed and approved by the MVG. The frequency of subsequent reviews is generally
based on the model risk rating and the materiality of usage of the model with more frequent review where
warranted by market conditions.
Revenue substantiation
Nomura’s Product Control function also ensures adherence to Nomura’s valuation policies through daily
and periodic analytical review of net revenues. This process involves substantiating revenue amounts throughexplanations and attribution of revenue sources based on the underlying factors such as interest rates, credit
spreads, volatility, foreign exchange rates etc. In combination with the independent price verification processes,
this daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly review substantiates the revenues made while helping to identify andresolve potential booking, pricing or risk quantification issues.

F-38

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Level 3 financial instruments
As described above, the valuation of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities is dependent on certain
significant inputs which cannot be observed in the market. Common characteristics of an inactive market include
a low number of transactions of the financial instrument, stale or non-current price quotes, price quotes that vary
substantially either over time or among market makers, non-executable broker quotes or little publicly released
information.
If corroborative evidence is not available to value Level 3 financial instruments, fair value may beestablished using other equivalent products in the market. The level of correlation between the specific Level 3
financial instrument and the available benchmark instrument is considered as an unobservable parameter. Other
techniques for determining an appropriate value for unobservable parameters may consider information such asconsensus pricing data among certain market participants, historical trends, extrapolation from observable market
data and other information Nomura would expect market participants to use in valuing similar instruments.
Use of reasonably possible alternative input assumptions to value Level 3 financial instruments will
significantly influence fair value determination. Ultimately, the uncertainties described above about input
assumptions imply that the fair value of Level 3 financial instruments is a judgmental estimate. The specificvaluation for each instrument is based on management’s judgment of prevailing market conditions, in accordancewith Nomura’s established valuation policies and procedures.
Quantitative information regarding significant unobservable inputs and assumptions
The following tables present information about the significant unobservable inputs and assumptions used by
Nomura for financial instruments classified as Level 3 as of March 31, 2012 and 2013. These financial
instruments will also typically include observable valuation inputs (i.e. Level 1 or Level 2 valuation inputs)
which are not included in the table and are also often hedged using financial instruments which are classified in
Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

F-39

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Financial Instrument

Fair value
in billions of yen

March 31, 2012
Significant
Valuation technique(s)unobservable inputs

Range ofvaluation inputs(1)Assets:Trading assets and private
equity investments
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥Private equity
investments . . . . . . . . . .

125

202

DCF

Credit spreads
Liquidity discounts

6.5 – 7.5 %20.0 – 30.0 %Market multiples

PE ratios
Price/Book ratios
Liquidity discounts

12.2 x1.7 x20.0 %

DCM

Capitalization rates

5.2 – 6.5 %

DCF

WACC
Growth rates
Operating margins
Liquidity discounts

6.8 – 12.0 %0.0 – 2.0 %23.0 %
0.0 – 30.0 %Market multiples

EV/EBITDA ratios
PE ratios
Price/Book ratios
Price/Embedded values
Liquidity discounts

4.3 – 12.6 x12.9 x
0.5 – 0.7 x
0.5 x
0.0 – 50.0 %Japanese agency andmunicipal securities . . .

10

DCF

Credit spreads

0.1 %Foreign government,
agency and municipal
securities . . . . . . . . . . . .

37

DCF

Credit spreads

0.6 – 17.0 %Bank and corporate debt
securities and loans for
trading purposes . . . . . .

62

DCF

Credit spreads

0.4 – 25.6 %Commercial mortgagebacked securities(“CMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . .

8

DCF

Yields
Prepayment rates
Default probabilities
Loss severities

3.0 – 24.5 %0.0 – 25.0 %0.0 – 60.0 %0.0 – 50.0 %Residential mortgagebacked securities(“RMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . .

5

DCF

Yields
Prepayment rates
Default probabilities
Loss severities

1.6 – 30.0 %1.0 – 5.0 %2.0 – 4.0 %20.0 – 40.0 %Real estate-backed
securities . . . . . . . . . . . .

91

DCF

YieldsDefault probabilities
Loss severities

4.0 – 15.0 %24.0 – 65.0 %80.0 – 100.0 %DCM

Capitalization rates

6.7 – 11.4 %DCF

Yields
Prepayment rates
Default probabilities
Loss severities

12.0 – 30.0 %0.0 – 15.0 %1.5 – 3.0 %30.0 – 60.0 %Collateralized debt
obligations (“CDO”)
and other . . . . . . . . . . . .

20

F-40

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Financial Instrument

March 31, 2012
Fair value
Significant
in billions of yen Valuation technique(s)unobservable inputs

Investment trust funds andother . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Range ofvaluation inputs(1)9DCF

Credit spreads
Correlations

0.0 – 13.6 %0.50 – 0.70

Derivatives, net:
Equity contracts . . . . . . . . .

14

Option models

Dividend yield
Volatilities
Correlations

0.1 – 13.5 %12.1 – 65.1 %(0.95) – 0.94

Interest rate contracts . . . . .

(39)

DCF

Forward FX rates
Interest rates
Volatilities
Correlations

53.2 – 105.4
0.8 – 4.7 %5.5 – 121.0 %(0.55) – 1.00

Credit contracts . . . . . . . . . .

(11)

DCF

Credit spreads
Recovery rates
Volatilities
Correlations

1.3 – 1,912.4 bps
5.0 – 52.0 %10.0 – 75.0 %0.11 – 1.00

Foreign exchange
contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

18

Option models

Volatilities

10.0 – 18.5 %DCF

Forward FX rates

2.5 – 11,052.0

Loans and receivables . . . . . . . . .

11

DCF

Credit spreads

3.0 – 15.0 %Other assets
Non-trading debt securities . .

6

DCF

Credit spreads

0.6 – 2.0 %

72

DCF

WACC
Growth rates

6.8 – 9.3 %0.0 %Market multiples

PE ratios
Price/Book ratios
Liquidity discounts

12.9 x0.5 x25.0 %

DCF

Yields
Prepayment rates
Default probabilities
Loss severities
Volatilities
Correlations

22.0 – 67.0 %15.0 %
2.0 – 6.0 %30.0 – 60.0 %5.5 – 118.5 %(0.76) – 1.00

Other(3)................

Liabilities:
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . ¥

(13)

F-41

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Financial Instrument

March 31, 2013
Significant
unobservable inputs

Range ofvaluation inputs(1)Weighted
Average(2)

DCF

YieldsLiquidity discounts

7.6 %25.0 – 38.0 %7.6 %35.4 %

DCM

Capitalization rates

5.2 – 6.7 %

6.3 %

DCF

WACC
Growth rates
Liquidity discounts

6.8 %
0.0 %
25.0 %

6.8 %0.0 %25.0 %

Market multiples

EV/EBITDA ratios
PE ratios
Price/Book ratios
Price/Embedded values
Liquidity discounts

3.7 – 11.3 x
7.7 x
0.4 x
0.4 x
0.0 – 33.0 %11.0 x
7.7 x
0.4 x
0.4 x
25.8 %

91

DCF

Credit spreads

0.0 – 6.5 %

0.7 %

69

DCF

Credit spreads
Recovery rates

0.0 – 24.2 %0.1 – 36.4 %2.6 %28.1 %

6

DCF

YieldsDefault probabilities
Loss severities

0.0 – 25.0 %100.0 %
0.0 – 80.0 %8.0 %100.0 %
0.3 %

4

DCF

Yields
Prepayment rates
Default probabilities
Loss severities

0.0 – 40.0 %0.0 – 8.2 %0.3 – 17.0 %22.0 – 90.0 %

3.3 %
4.5 %
14.7 %
64.2 %68

DCF

YieldsDefault probabilities
Loss severities

1.8 – 15.0 %24.0 – 65.0 %80.0 – 100.0 %1.9 %42.6 %
88.0 %

DCM

Capitalization rates

6.8 %

6.8 %

Fair value
in billions of yen

Valuationtechnique(s)Assets:Trading assets andprivate equity
investments
Equities . . . . . . . . ¥Private equity
investments . . .

Foreigngovernment,
agency andmunicipal
securities . . . . .
Bank andcorporate debt
securities andloans fortrading
purposes . . . . .
Commercial
mortgagebacked
securities(“CMBS”) . . .
Residential
mortgagebacked
securities(“RMBS”) . . .
Real estatebacked
securities . . . . .

129

87

F-42

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
March 31, 2013
Significant
unobservable inputs

Range ofvaluation inputs(1)Weighted
Average(2)

DCF

Yields
Prepayment rates
Default probabilities
Loss severities

0.0 – 58.6 %0.0 – 15.0 %2.0 – 5.0 %30.0 – 75.0 %17.1 %
13.8 %
2.1 %45.6 %

13

DCF

Credit spreads
Correlations

0.0 – 6.5 %0.50 – 0.70

0.6 %
0.60

5

Option models

Dividend yield
Volatilities
Correlations

0.0 – 11.0 %5.7 – 92.4 %(0.77) – 0.99

—
—
—

(54)

DCF/
Option models

Forward FX rates
Interest rates

62.9 – 121.7
0.6 – 4.2 %——Option models

Volatilities
Correlations

13.5 – 118.1 %(0.70) – 0.99

—
—

DCF/
Option models

Credit spreads
Recovery rates

0.0 –7.5 %15.0 –40.0 %——Option models

Volatilities
Correlations

10.0 –70.0 %0.33 –0.90——

Option models

Volatilities

1.4 –20.7 %—DCF

Forward FX rates

2.7 –12,484.0—

Fair value
in billions of yen

Valuationtechnique(s)12Investment trust
funds andother . . . . . . . .
Derivatives, net:
Equitycontracts . . . . .

Financial Instrument

Collateralized
debt
obligations(“CDO”) andother . . . . . . . .

Interest rate
contracts . . . . .

Creditcontracts . . . . .

Foreign exchange
contracts . . . . .

25

(3)

Loans andreceivables . . . . . . .

3

DCF

Credit spreads

3.0 %

3.0 %

Other assets
Non-trading debt
securities . . . . . . .

4

DCF

Credit spreads

0.2 – 2.5 %1.7 %Other(3) . . . . . . . . . .

60

DCF

WACC
Growth rates
YieldsLiquidity discounts

6.8 – 6.8 %0.0 – 1.0 %7.6 %0.0 – 30.0 %

6.8 %
0.9 %
7.6 %
8.0 %

Market multiples

EV/EBITDA ratios
PE ratios
Price/Book ratios
Liquidity discounts

6.9 – 12.5 x
7.7 – 44.4 x
0.0 – 5.6 x
25.0 – 30.0 %9.9 x
25.8 x1.7 x29.8 %

Volatilities
Correlations

13.5 – 118.1 %(0.77) – 0.99——

Liabilities:
Long-term borrowings . .

¥222

DCF

F-43

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)(1) Range information is provided in percentages, coefficients and multiples and represents the highest and lowest level significant
unobservable valuation input used to value that type of financial instrument. A wide dispersion in the range does not necessarily reflectincreased uncertainty or subjectivity in the valuation input and is typically just a consequence of the different characteristics of thefinancial instruments themselves.
(2) Weighted average information for non-derivative instruments is calculated by weighting each valuation input by the fair value of thefinancial instrument.
(3) Valuation technique(s) and unobservable inputs represent those equity securities reported within Other assets.

Qualitative discussion of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs
Derivatives—Equity contracts—The significant unobservable inputs are dividend yield, volatilities andcorrelations. The range of dividend yields varies as some companies do not pay any dividends, for example due
to a lack of profits or as a policy during a growth period, and hence have a zero dividend yield while others may
pay a high dividend for example to return money to investors. The range of volatilities is wide as the volatilities
of shorter-dated equity derivatives are typically higher than those of longer-dated instruments. Correlations
represent the relationships between one input and another (“pairs”) and can either be positive or negative
amounts. The range of correlations moves from positive to negative because the movement of some pairs is very
closely related in the same direction causing high positive correlations while others generally move in opposite
directions causing high negative correlations with pairs that have differing relationships throughout the range.
Derivatives—Interest rate contracts—The significant unobservable inputs are forward FX rates, interest
rates, volatilities and correlations. The wide range of forward FX rates is primarily due to long-dated exchange
rates of different currencies against the Japanese Yen. The range of interest rates is due to interest rates indifferent countries/currencies being at different levels with some countries having extremely low levels andothers being at levels that while still relatively low are less so. The range of volatilities is wide as the volatilities
of shorter-dated interest rate derivatives are typically higher than those of longer-dated instruments. The range ofcorrelations moves from positive to negative because the movement of some pairs is very closely related in thesame direction causing high positive correlations while others generally move in opposite directions causing highnegative correlations with pairs that have differing relationships through the range. Other than for volatilities
where the majority of the inputs are away from the higher end of the range, the other significant unobservable
inputs are spread across the relevant ranges.
Derivatives—Credit contracts—The significant unobservable inputs are credit spreads, recovery rates,
volatilities and correlations. The range of credit spreads is relatively narrow with the low end of the range arisingfrom exposure to underlying reference names with very limited risk of a default and the high end arising fromexposure to underlying reference names with a much greater risk of default. The range of recovery rates varies
mainly due to the seniority of the underlying exposure with senior exposures having a higher recovery thansubordinated exposures. The range of volatilities is wide as the volatilities of shorter-dated credit contracts are
typically higher than those of longer-dated instruments. The correlation range is positive since credit spreadmoves are generally in the same direction. High positive correlations are those for which the movement is closely
related with the correlation falling as the relationship becomes less strong. Other than for volatilities where themajority of inputs are away from the higher end of the range, the other significant unobservable inputs are spread
across the relevant ranges.
Derivatives—Foreign exchange contracts—The significant unobservable inputs are volatilities and forward
FX rates. The range of volatilities is relatively low with the lower end coming from currencies that trade in
narrow ranges versus the US dollar. The wide range of forward FX rates is primarily due to long-dated exchange
rates of different currencies against the US dollar. All significant unobservable inputs are spread across therelevant ranges.
F-44

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Long-term borrowings—The range of volatilities is wide as the volatilities of shorter-dated instruments are
typically higher than those in longer-dated instruments. The range of correlations moves from positive tonegative because the movement of some pairs is very closely related in the same direction causing high positive
correlations while others generally move in opposite directions causing high negative correlations with pairs thathave differing relationships through the range. Other than for volatilities where the majority of inputs are awayfrom the lower end of the range, the other significant unobservable inputs are be spread across the relevant
ranges.
Sensitivity of fair value to changes in unobservable inputs
For each class of financial instrument described in the above tables, changes in the each of the significant
unobservable inputs and assumptions used by Nomura will impact upon the determination of a fair value
measurement for the financial instrument. The sensitivity of these Level 3 fair value measurements to changes in
unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs are described below:• Equities, Private equity investments and equity securities reported within Other assets—When using
DCF valuation techniques to determine fair value, a significant increase (decrease) in yields, credit
spreads or liquidity discount in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value
measurement. Conversely, a significant increase (decrease) in operating margin or growth rate would
result in a corresponding significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. There is little
interrelationship between these measures. When using market multiples to determine fair value, asignificant increase (decrease) in the relevant multiples such as PE ratios, EV/EBITDA ratios, Price/
Book ratios, Price/Embedded Value ratios in isolation would result in a higher (lower) fair value
measurement. Conversely, a significant increase (decrease) in the liquidity discount applied to theholding in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally
changes in assumptions around multiples result in a corresponding similar directional change in a fairvalue measurement, assuming earnings levels remain constant. When using DCM, a significant increase(decrease) in the capitalization rate would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value
measurement.
• Japanese agency and municipal securities, Foreign government, agency and municipal securities, Bankand corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes, Loans and receivables and Non-trading
debt securities—Significant increases (decreases) in the credit spreads used in a DCF valuation
technique would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement, while significant
increases (decreases) in recovery rates would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value
measurement.
• Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), Residential mortgage-backed securities(“RMBS”), Real estate-backed securities and Collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) and other—
Significant increases (decreases) in yields, prepayment rates, default probabilities and loss severities inisolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change indefault probabilities is accompanied by a directionally similar change in loss severities and a
directionally opposite change prepayment rates. When using DCM, a significant increase (decrease) in
the capitalization rate would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
• Investment trust funds and other—Significant increases (decreases) in credit spreads used in a DCF
valuation technique would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement, while
significant increases (decreases) in correlation would result in a significantly higher (lower ) fair value
measurement.
• Derivatives—Where Nomura is long the underlying risk of a derivative, significant increases(decreases) in the underlying of the derivative, such as interest rates, credit spreads or forward FX rates
in isolation or significant decreases (increases) in dividend yields would result in a significantly higher(lower) fair value measurement. Where Nomura is short the underlying risk of a derivative, the impact
F-45

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)of these changes would have a converse effect on the fair value measurements reported by Nomura.
Where Nomura is long optionality, recovery rates or correlation, significant increases (decreases) involatilities, recovery rates or correlation will generally result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value
measurement. Where Nomura is short optionality, recovery rates or correlation, the impact of thesechanges would have a converse effect on the fair value measurements.
•

Long-term borrowings—Significant increases (decreases) in yields, prepayment rates, default
probabilities, and loss severities in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value
measurement. Generally, a change in default probabilities is accompanied by a directionally similarchange in the assumption used for loss severities and a directionally opposite change in prepayment
rates. Where Nomura is long optionality or correlation, significant increases (decreases) in volatilities orcorrelation will generally result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Where Nomura
is short optionality or correlation, the impact of these changes would have a converse effect on the fairvalue measurements.

Movements in Level 3 financial instruments
The following tables present gains and losses as well as increases and decreases of financial instruments
measured at fair value on a recurring basis which Nomura classified as Level 3 for the years ended March 31,
2012 and 2013. Financial instruments classified as Level 3 are often hedged with instruments within Level 1 orLevel 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The gains or losses presented below do not reflect the offsetting gains orlosses for these hedging instruments. Level 3 financial instruments are also measured using both observable andunobservable inputs. Fair value changes presented below, therefore, reflect realized and unrealized gains andlosses resulting from movements in both observable and unobservable parameters.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, gains and losses related to Level 3 assets did not have a material impact
on Nomura’s liquidity and capital resources management.

F-46

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Billions of yen
Year ended March 31, 2012
Total gains(losses)
Balance
Total gains
recognized in
Balance
as of(losses)other
Foreign Transfers Transfers
as ofApril 1,
recognizedcomprehensive Purchases
Sales /
exchange
into
out of March 31,
2011 in net revenue(1)income/ issues(2) redemptions(2) Settlements movements Level 3(3) Level 3(3)2012

Assets:Trading assets and private
equity investments
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥121
Private equity
investments . . . . . . . . . . 289
Japanese agency andmunicipal securities . . . —Foreign government,
agency and municipal
securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
23Bank and corporate debt
securities and loans for
trading purposes . . . . . .
51
Commercial mortgagebacked securities(“CMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . .
28
Residential mortgagebacked securities(“RMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . .
3Real estate-backed
securities . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
Collateralized debt
obligations (“CDO”)
and other . . . . . . . . . . . .
34
Investment trust funds andother . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10
Total trading assets and private
equity investments . . . . . . . .
Derivatives, net(4)Equity contracts . . . . . . . .
Interest rate contracts . . . .
Credit contracts . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange
contracts . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commodity contracts . . . .
Total derivatives, net . . . . . . . .

¥ (11)¥—¥ 57¥ (27)

¥—

23
0

¥ (1)

¥

8

¥ (22)

¥125

—

4

(112)

—

(2)

—

27

(18)

—

—

1

—

202

(0)

10

11

—

415

(403)

—

—

4

(13)

37

(0)

—

159

(154)

—

(0)

44

(38)

62

0

—

8

(33)

—

0

6

(1)

8

0

—

3

(13)

—

0

13

(1)

5

1

—

7

(45)

—

(0)

—

—

91

(1)

—

21

(24)

—

0

8

(18)

20

(1)

—

2

(2)

—

(0)

0

—

9

687

22

—

703

(831)

—

(3)

84

(93)

569

28
11
(55)

(13)
(3)
(30)

—
—
—

—
—
—

—
—
—

6
(24)
52

(2)
(4)
3

(4)
12
25

(1)
(31)
(6)

14
(39)
(11)

2
(2)

22
0

—
—

—
—

—
—

(6)
(0)

0
(0)

0
2

(0)
0

18
(0)

—

(16)

(24)

—

—

—

28

(3)

35

(38)

(18)

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥671

¥ (2)

¥—

¥703

¥(831)

¥ 28

¥ (6)

¥119

¥(131)¥551

Loans and receivables . . . . . . . .
Other assets
Non-trading debt
securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11

(4)

—

10

(5)

—

(0)

—

(1)

11

0
25

0
(1)

(0)
(1)

8
66

(2)
(17)

—
—

(0)
0

—
0

—
(0)

6
72

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥707

¥ (7)

¥ (1)

¥787

¥(855)

¥ 28

¥ (6)

¥119

¥(132)¥640

Liabilities:
Trading liabilities
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥—Bank and corporate debt
securities . . . . . . . . . . . . —

¥—

¥

¥

¥

0

¥

1

¥—

¥ (0)

(0)

—

2

0

¥—

¥—

(1)

—

—

Total trading liabilities . . . . . . . ¥—

¥ (0)

¥—

(1)

¥—

¥—

Short-term borrowings . . . . . . .
Payables and deposits . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . .

1
1
144

0
(0)
(50)

—
—
—

16
(0)
77

(15)
(1)
(183)

—
—
—

0
—
(10)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥146

¥ (50)¥—¥ 95¥(200)¥—¥ (10)

¥

F-47

2

¥

¥

¥

0

¥—

—

—

0

¥—

1

0
—
2

(2)
—
(93)

0
(0)
(13)

2

¥ (95)¥ (12)NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Billions of yen
Year ended March 31, 2013
Total gains(losses)
Balance Total gains
recognized in
Balance
as of(losses)
Foreign Transfers Transfers
as of
other
April 1,
recognized
Sales /
exchange
into
out of March 31,
comprehensive Purchases/ issues(2) redemptions(2) Settlements movements Level 3(3) Level 3(3)2012 in net revenue(1)income2013

Assets:Trading assets and private
equity investments
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥125
Private equity
investments . . . . . . . . 202
Japanese agency andmunicipal
securities . . . . . . . . . .
10Foreign government,
agency and municipal
securities . . . . . . . . . .
37
Bank and corporate debt
securities and loans
for trading
purposes . . . . . . . . . . .
62
Commercial mortgagebacked securities(“CMBS”) . . . . . . . . .
8Residential mortgagebacked securities(“RMBS”) . . . . . . . . .
5Real estate-backed
securities . . . . . . . . . .
91
Collateralized debt
obligations (“CDO”)
and other . . . . . . . . . .
20
Investment trust funds
and other . . . . . . . . . .
9Total trading assets andprivate equity
investments . . . . . . . . . . . . 569
Derivatives, net(4)Equity contracts . . . . . . .
14Interest rate contracts . . . (39)Credit contracts . . . . . . . (11)Foreign exchange
contracts . . . . . . . . . .
18
Commodity contracts . .
(0)
Total derivatives, net . . . . . . . (18)
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥551
Loans and receivables . . . . . .
11
Other assets
Non-trading debt
securities . . . . . . . . . .
6
Other(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
72
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥640
Liabilities:
Trading liabilities
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 0Bank and corporate debt
securities . . . . . . . . . .
1
Total trading liabilities . . . . . ¥ 1
Short-term borrowings . . . . .
0Payables and deposits . . . . . .
(0)Long-term borrowings . . . . . . (13)Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . —Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ (12)¥¥ (25)

¥129

—

87

0

(0)

0

0

62

(44)

91

—

7

69

(35)

69

(15)

—

1

4

(6)

6

19

(20)

—

0

2

(3)

4

—

1

(26)

—

0

—

—

68

(1)

—

11

(17)

—

1

3

(5)

12

2

—

2

(0)

—

0

0

(0)

13

64

—

1,060

(1,265)

—

23

146

(118)

479

(9)
(15)
(16)

—
—
—

—
—
—

—
—
—

(11)
(1)
12

4
(1)
6

(1)
(0)
15

8
2
19

5
(54)
25

(1)
0
(41)
¥ 23
(0)

—
—
—
¥—
—

—
—
—
¥1,0600———¥(1,265)
(3)

1
(0)
1
¥ 1
—

(1)
(0)
8
¥ 31
1

(6)
0
8
¥154
—

(14)
(0)
15
¥(103)
(6)

(3)
(0)
(27)
¥452
3

0
21
¥ 44

0
1
¥1,061(2)(32)¥(1,302)

—
—
¥ 1

0
0
¥ 32

—

¥

0
0
0

0
¥154

—
(2)
¥(111)

4
60
¥519

¥

(0)

¥—

¥

¥

(0)

¥—

¥

0

¥

¥—

¥

(0)
(0)
(0)
(1)
(155)
0
¥(156)

—
¥—
—
—
—
—
¥—

0
0
6
(0)
108
0
¥ 114

(1)
(1)
(1)
(0)
(82)
(0)
(84)

—
¥—
—
—
—
—
¥—

¥

0
0

¥

(0)
(0)
(2)
—
(59)
(0)
¥ (61)

0
0
4
1
222
0
¥227

¥

2

¥—

9

—

0

¥

38

(22)

¥—

4

(137)

—

9

—

—

1

(11)

—

—

39

—

728

(731)

—

7

—

245

(286)

3

—

11

1

—

2

¥

F-48

0

¥

¥

¥

¥

5

—
—
3
0
¥ 3

¥

6

0
—
0
1

—
110
—
¥111

¥

¥

0

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)(1) Includes gains and losses reported primarily within Net gain on trading, Gain (loss) on private equity investments, and also within Gain(loss) on investments in equity securities, Revenue—Other and Non-interest expenses—Other, Interest and dividends and Interest
expense in the consolidated statements of income.
(2) Amounts reported in Purchases / issues include increases in trading liabilities while Sales / redemptions include decreases in trading
liabilities.
(3) If financial instruments move from Level 3 to another Level or move from another Level to Level 3, the amount reported in Transfers
into Level 3 and Transfers out of Level 3 are the fair value as of the beginning of the quarter during which the movement occurs.
Therefore if financial instruments move from another Level to Level 3, all gains/ (losses) during the quarter are included in the table andif financial instruments move from Level 3 to another Level, all gains/ (losses) during the year are excluded from the table.
(4) Each derivative classification includes derivatives referencing multiple risk components. For example, interest rate contracts include
complex derivatives referencing interest rate risk as well as foreign exchange risk or other factors such as prepayments rates. Credit
contracts include credit default swaps as well as derivatives referencing corporate and government debt securities.
(5) Includes the impact of the refined fair value measurement of certain investments in unlisted equity securities.

F-49

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Unrealized gains and losses recognized for Level 3 financial instruments
The following table presents the amounts of unrealized gains (losses) for the years ended March 31, 2012
and 2013, relating to those financial instruments which Nomura classified as Level 3 within the fair value
hierarchy and that were still held by Nomura at the relevant consolidated balance sheet date.
Billions of yen
March 3120122013
Unrealized gains / (losses)(1)

Assets:Trading assets and private equity investments
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japanese agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes . . . . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ (2)
(12)
(0)
2
(3)
3
(0)
1
(1)
(0)

Total trading assets and private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(12)

(4)

Derivatives, net(2)Equity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(6)
(9)
(45)
16
0

7
24
12
(4)
0

Total derivatives, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(44)

39

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ (56)¥ 35

Loans and receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets
Non-trading debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(3)

(0)

0
(2)

0
24

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ (61)¥ 59

Liabilities:
Trading liabilities
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥—

¥

0

Total trading liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥—

¥

0

¥

1
(10)
0
2
(0)
1
0
(0)
(0)
2

Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payables and deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0
(0)
(63)
—

(1)
(1)
(162)
(0)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ (63)¥(164)F-50

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)(1) Includes gains and losses reported primarily within Net gain on trading, Gain (loss) on private equity
investments, and also within Gain (loss) on investments in equity securities, Revenue—Other and Noninterest expenses—Other, Interest and dividends and Interest expense in the consolidated statements ofincome.
(2) Each derivative classification includes derivatives referencing multiple risk components. For example,
interest rate contracts include complex derivatives referencing interest rate risk as well as foreign exchange
risk or other factors such as prepayment rates. Credit contracts include credit default swaps as well asderivatives referencing corporate and government debt securities.
(3) Includes the impact of the refined fair value measurement of certain investments in unlisted equity
securities.
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy
Nomura assumes that all transfers of financial instruments from one level to another level within the fairvalue hierarchy occur at the beginning of the relevant quarter in which the transfer takes place. Amounts reported
below therefore represent the fair value of the financial instruments at the beginning of the relevant quarter when
the transfer was made.
Transfers between Level 1 and Level 2
For the nine months ended December 31, 2011, there were no significant transfers between Level 1 andLevel 2.
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, a total of ¥115 billion of financial assets (excluding derivative
assets) were transferred from Level 1 to Level 2. This comprised primarily ¥113 billion of equities reported
within Trading assets and private equity investments—Equities which were transferred because the observable
markets in which these instruments were traded became inactive. During the same period, a total of ¥180 billionof financial liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) were transferred from Level 1 to Level 2. This also
comprised primarily ¥171 billion of short sales of equities reported within Trading liabilities which weretransferred because the observable markets in which these instruments were traded became inactive.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, a total of ¥631 billion of financial assets (excluding derivative assets) weretransferred from Level 1 to Level 2. This comprised primarily ¥361 billion of equities reported within Trading
assets and private equity investments—Equities which were transferred because the observable markets in whichthese instruments were traded became inactive. This also comprised primarily ¥249 billion of debt securities
reported within Other assets—Nontrading debt securities, ¥15 billion of exchange traded funds reported within
Investment trust funds and other and ¥6 billion of equity securities reported within Other assets—Other which weretransferred because the observable markets in which these instruments were traded became inactive. During thesame period, a total of ¥80 billion of financial liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) were transferred fromLevel 1 to Level 2. This comprised primarily ¥72 billion of short sales of equities reported within Trading liabilities
which were transferred because the observable markets in which these instruments were traded became inactive.
This also comprised primarily ¥8 billion of short sales of exchange traded funds reported within Investment trust
funds and other which were transferred because the observable markets in which these instruments were tradedbecame inactive.
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, a total of ¥12 billion of financial assets (excluding derivative
assets) were transferred from Level 2 to Level 1. This comprised primarily ¥7 billion of equities reported within
Trading assets and private equity investments—Equities which were transferred because the observable markets
in which these instruments were traded became active. During the same period, a total of ¥7 billion of financial
F-51

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) were transferred from Level 2 to Level 1. This comprised primarily¥7 billion of short sales of equities reported within Trading liabilities which were transferred because theobservable markets in which these instruments were traded became active.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, a total of ¥455 billion of financial assets (excluding derivative assets)
were transferred from Level 2 to Level 1. This comprised primarily ¥441 billion of equities reported within
Trading assets and private equity investments—Equities which were transferred because the observable markets
in which these instruments were traded became active. This also comprised primarily ¥5 billion of exchange
traded funds reported within Investment trust funds and other and ¥7 billion of equity securities reported within
Other assets—Other which were transferred because the observable markets in which these instruments weretraded became active. During the same period, a total of ¥391 billion of financial liabilities (excluding derivative
liabilities) were transferred from Level 2 to Level 1. This comprised primarily ¥388 billion of short sales of
equities reported within Trading liabilities which were transferred because the observable markets in which these
instruments were traded became active.
Transfers out of Level 3
For nine months ended December 31, 2011, there were no significant transfers out of Level 3.
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, a total of ¥25 billion of financial assets (excluding derivative
assets) were transferred out of Level 3. This comprised primarily ¥16 billion of Bank and corporate debt
securities and loans for trading purposes, principally debt securities and loans, which were transferred because
credit spreads became observable. During the same period, a total of ¥48 billion of financial liabilities (excluding
derivative liabilities) were transferred out of Level 3. This comprised primarily ¥48 billion of Long-termborrowings, principally structured notes, which were transferred because certain volatility and correlation
valuation inputs became observable.
A total of ¥21 billion of net derivative assets were also transferred out of Level 3. This comprised primarily¥19 billion of net interest rate derivative assets which were transferred because certain volatility and correlation
valuation inputs became observable.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, a total of ¥126 billion of financial assets (excluding derivative assets)
were transferred out of Level 3. This comprised primarily ¥25 billion of Equities which were transferred because
certain yields and liquidity discounts became observable, ¥44 billion of Foreign government, agency andmunicipal securities which were transferred because certain credit spreads became observable and ¥35 billion of
Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes, principally debt securities and loans, whichwere transferred because certain credit spreads and recovery rates became observable. This also comprised
primarily ¥6 billion of CMBS which were transferred because certain yields, default probabilities and loss
severities became observable, ¥5 billion of CDO and other which were transferred because certain yields,
prepayment rates, default probabilities and loss severities became observable and ¥6 billion of Loans andreceivables, principally loans, which were transferred because certain credit spreads became observable. During
the same period, a total of ¥61 billion of financial liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) were transferred outof Level 3. This comprised primarily ¥59 billion of Long-term borrowings, principally structured notes, whichwere transferred because certain volatility and correlation valuation inputs became observable.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, a total of ¥15 billion of net derivative liabilities were also transferredout of Level 3. This comprised primarily ¥8 billion of net equity derivative liabilities which were transferredbecause certain dividend yields, volatility and correlation valuation inputs became observable, ¥19 billion of net
credit derivative liabilities which were transferred because certain credit spread, recovery rate, volatility andcorrelation valuation inputs became observable and ¥14 billion of net foreign exchange derivative assets whichwere transferred because certain volatility and forward FX rate valuation inputs became observable.
F-52

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Transfers into Level 3
For the nine months ended December 31, 2011, there were no significant transfers into Level 3.
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, a total of ¥15 billion of financial assets (excluding derivative
assets) were transferred into Level 3. This comprised primarily ¥9 billion of Bank and corporate debt securities
and loans for trading purposes, principally debt securities, which were transferred because credit spreads became
unobservable. The amount of gains and losses on these transfer reported in Bank and corporate debt securities
and loans for trading purposes which were recognized in the quarter when the transfer into Level 3 occurred
were not significant. During the same period, a total of ¥1 billion of financial liabilities (excluding derivative
liabilities) were transferred into Level 3. The amount of gains and losses on these transfer reported in financial
liabilities which were recognized in the quarter when the transfer into Level 3 occurred were not significant.
A total of ¥34 billion of net derivative assets were also transferred into Level 3. This comprised primarily¥14 billion of net interest rate derivative assets which were transferred because certain volatility and correlation
valuation inputs became unobservable and ¥21 billion of net credit derivative assets which were transferred because
certain credit spread, recovery rate, volatility and correlation valuation inputs became unobservable. Losses on theseinterest rate and credit contracts which were recognized in the quarter when the transfer into Level 3 occurred were
¥5 billion and ¥2 billion, respectively.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, a total of ¥146 billion of financial assets (excluding derivative assets)
were transferred into Level 3. This comprised primarily ¥6 billion of Equities which were transferred because
certain yields and liquidity discounts became unobservable, ¥69 billion of Bank and corporate debt securities
and loans for trading purposes, principally debt securities and loans, which were transferred because certain
credit spread and recovery rate valuation inputs became unobservable and ¥62 billion of Foreign government,
agency and municipal securities which were transferred because certain credit spreads became unobservable. The
amount of gains and losses on these transfer reported in Equities and Bank and corporate debt securities andloans for trading purposes which were recognized in the quarter when the transfer into Level 3 occurred were notsignificant. Gains on these transfer reported in Foreign government, agency and municipal securities which wererecognized in the quarter when the transfer into Level 3 occurred were ¥9 billion. During the same period, a totalof ¥111 billion of financial liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) were transferred into Level 3. This
comprised primarily ¥110 billion of Long-term borrowings, principally structured notes, which were transferredbecause certain volatility and correlation valuation inputs became unobservable. Losses on these transfer reported
in Long-term borrowings which were recognized in the quarter when the transfer into Level 3 occurred were ¥7billion.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, a total of ¥8 billion of net derivative assets were also transferred into
Level 3. This comprised ¥15 billion of net credit derivative assets which were transferred because certain credit
spread, recovery rate, volatility and correlation valuation inputs became unobservable and ¥6 billion of net
foreign exchange derivative liabilities which were transferred because certain volatility and forward FX ratevaluation inputs became unobservable. The amount of gains and losses on the credit contracts and foreignexchange contracts which were recognized in the quarter when the transfer into Level 3 occurred were notsignificant.
Investments in investment funds that calculate NAV per share
In the normal course of business, Nomura invests in non-consolidated funds which meet the definition of
investment companies or are similar in nature and which do not have readily determinable fair values. For certainof these investments, Nomura uses NAV per share as the basis for valuation as a practical expedient. Some ofthese investments are redeemable at different amounts from NAV per share.
F-53

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables present information on these investments where NAV per share is calculated ordisclosed as of March 31, 2012 and 2013. Investments are presented by major category relevant to the nature of
Nomura’s business and risks.

Fair value(1)Unfundedcommitments(2)Billions of yen
March 31, 2012
Redemption frequency(if currently eligible)(3)Hedge funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Venture capital funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Private equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥109
4
61
11

¥ 0
1
12
15

Monthly—
Quarterly—

Same day-95 days—
30 days—

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥185

¥28

Redemption notice
period(4)Same day-95 days—
30 days—

Fair value(1)Unfundedcommitments(2)Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
Redemption frequency(if currently eligible)(3)Hedge funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Venture capital funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Private equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 68
4
63
3

¥16
1
7
—

Monthly—
Quarterly—

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥138

¥24

Redemption notice
period(4)(1) Fair value generally determined using NAV per share as a practical expedient.
(2) The contractual amount of any unfunded commitments Nomura is required to make to the entities in which
the investment is held.
(3) The range in frequency with which Nomura can redeem investments.
(4) The range in notice period required to be provided before redemption is possible.
Hedge funds:
These investments include funds of funds that invest in multiple asset classes. Nomura has developed thebusiness of issuing structured notes linked to hedge funds. As a result, most of the risks are transferred as passthrough. The fair values of these investments are estimated using the NAV per share of the investments.
Although most of these funds can be redeemed within six months, certain funds cannot be redeemed within
six months due to contractual, liquidity or gating issues. The redemption period cannot be estimated for certain
suspended or liquidating funds. Some of these investments contain restrictions against transfers of theinvestments to third parties.
Venture capital funds:
These investments include primarily start-up funds. The fair values of these investments in this category are
estimated using the NAV per share of the investments. Most of these funds cannot be redeemed within six
months. The redemption period cannot be estimated for certain suspended or liquidating funds. These
investments contain restrictions against transfers of the investments to third parties.

F-54

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Private equity funds:
These investments are made mainly in various sectors in Europe, United States and Japan. The fair values ofthese investments in this category are estimated using the NAV per share. Redemption is restricted for most ofthese investments. Some of these investments contain restrictions against transfers of the investments to third
parties.
Real estate funds:
These are investments in commercial and other types of real estate. The fair values of these investments inthis category are estimated using the NAV per share of the investments. Redemption is restricted for most ofthese investments. These investments contain restrictions against transfers of the investments to third parties.
Fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities
Nomura carries certain eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value through the election of the fairvalue option permitted by ASC 815 and ASC 825. When Nomura elects the fair value option for an eligible item,changes in that item’s fair value are recognized through earnings. Election of the fair value option is generally
irrevocable unless an event that gives rise to a new basis of accounting for that instrument occurs.
The financial assets and financial liabilities primarily elected for the fair value option by Nomura, and thereasons for the election, are as follows:•

Equity method investments reported within Trading assets and private equity investments held forcapital appreciation or current income purposes which Nomura generally has an intention to exit rather
than hold indefinitely. Nomura elects the fair value option to more appropriately represent the purposeof these investments in these consolidated financial statements.

•

Loans reported within Loans and receivables which are risk managed on a fair value basis and loan
commitments related to loans receivable for which the fair value option will be elected upon funding.
Nomura elects the fair value option to mitigate volatility through earnings caused by the difference inmeasurement basis that otherwise would arise between loans and the derivatives used to risk manage
those instruments.

•

Resale and repurchase agreements reported within Collateralized agreements and Collateralized
financing which are risk managed on a fair value basis. Nomura elects the fair value option to mitigate
volatility through earnings caused by the difference in measurement basis that otherwise would arise
between the resale and repurchase agreements and the derivatives used to risk manage those
instruments.

•

All structured notes issued on or after April 1, 2008 reported within Short-term borrowings and Longterm borrowings. Nomura elects the fair value option for those structured notes primarily to mitigate thevolatility through earnings caused by differences in the measurement basis for structured notes and thederivatives Nomura uses to risk manage those positions. Nomura also elects the fair value option forcertain notes issued by consolidated VIEs for the same purpose and for certain structured notes issued
prior to April 1, 2008.

•

Financial liabilities reported within Long-term borrowings recognized in transactions which areaccounted for as secured financing transactions under ASC 860. Nomura elects the fair value option forthese financial liabilities to mitigate volatility through earnings that otherwise would arise had thiselection not been made. Even though Nomura usually has little or no continuing economic exposure to
the transferred financial assets, they remain on the consolidated balance sheets and continue to be
carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through earnings.
F-55

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Interest and dividends arising from financial instruments for which the fair value option has been elected arerecognized within Interest and dividends, Interest expense or Net gain on trading.
The following table presents gains (losses) due to changes in fair value for financial instruments measured atfair value using the fair value option for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013.
Billions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013
Gains/(Losses)(1)

Assets:Trading assets and private equity investments(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans and receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized agreements(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ (4)
0
8
6
—

¥ 0
(12)
(6)
10
(0)

¥ 2
(10)
19
(0)
1

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 10

¥ (8)

¥ 12

Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized financing(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings(4)(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ (7)
(0)
(37)
—

¥(14)
(1)
(11)
0

¥ (4)
(1)
(51)
0

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ (44)

¥(26)

¥(56)

(1) Includes gains and losses reported primarily within Net gain on trading and Gain on private equity
investments in the consolidated statements of income.
(2) Includes equity investments that would have been accounted for under the equity method had Nomura notchosen to elect the fair value option.
(3) Includes resale and repurchase agreements.
(4) Includes structured notes and other financial liabilities.
(5) Includes secured financing transactions arising from transfers of financial assets which did not meet thecriteria for sales accounting.
(6) Includes loan commitments.
Nomura currently carries its investment in the common stock of Ashikaga Holdings Co., Ltd. (“Ashikaga
Holdings”) at fair value through election of the fair value option. Nomura held 45.5% of the common stock as ofMarch 31, 2011 and 47.0% as of March 31, 2012 and 2013. This investment is reported within Trading assets
and private equity investments—Private equity investments and Other assets—Other in the consolidated balance
sheets.
Ashikaga Holdings recognized total revenue of ¥106 billion, total expense of ¥90 billion and net income
after tax of ¥16 billion for the year ended March 31, 2011, determined in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in Japan. Ashikaga Holdings recognized total revenue of ¥101 billion, total expense of¥84 billion and net income after tax of ¥17 billion for the year ended March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, its
total assets and total liabilities were ¥5,354 billion and ¥5,097 billion, respectively, determined in accordancewith accounting principles generally accepted in Japan. Ashikaga Holdings recognized total revenue of
F-56

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)¥99 billion, total expense of ¥80 billion and net income after tax of ¥15 billion for the year ended March 31,
2013. As of March 31, 2013, its total assets and total liabilities were ¥5,434 billion and ¥5,155 billion,
respectively, determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Japan.
Nomura calculates the impact of changes in its own creditworthiness on certain financial liabilities forwhich the fair value option is elected by DCF valuation techniques at a rate which incorporates observablechanges in its credit spread. Gains from changes in the fair value of the financial liabilities for which the fairvalue option was elected, attributable to the change in Nomura’s creditworthiness, were ¥9 billion for the year
ended March 31, 2011, mainly because of the widening of Nomura’s credit spread. Gains from changes in thefair value of the financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected, attributable to the change in
Nomura’s creditworthiness, were ¥17 billion for the year ended March 31, 2012, mainly because of the wideningof Nomura’s credit spread. Losses from changes in the fair value of the financial liabilities for which the fairvalue option was elected, attributable to the change in Nomura’s creditworthiness, were ¥31 billion for the year
ended March 31, 2013, mainly because of a tightening of Nomura’s credit spread.
There was no significant impact on financial assets for which the fair value option was elected attributable
to instrument-specific credit risk.
As of March 31, 2012, the fair value of the aggregate unpaid principal balance (which is contractuallyprincipally protected) of loans and receivables for which the fair value option was elected was ¥1 billion morethan the principal balance of such loans and receivables. The fair value of the aggregate unpaid principal balance(which is contractually principally protected) of long-term borrowings for which the fair value option was electedwas ¥13 billion less than the principal balance of such long-term borrowings. There were no loans andreceivables for which the fair value option was elected that were 90 days or more past due.
As of March 31, 2013, the fair value of the aggregate unpaid principal balance (which is contractuallyprincipally protected) of loans and receivables for which the fair value option was elected was ¥1 billion morethan the principal balance of such loans and receivables. The fair value of the aggregate unpaid principal balance(which is contractually principally protected) of long-term borrowings for which the fair value option was electedwas ¥20 billion more than the principal balance of such long-term borrowings. There were no loans andreceivables for which the fair value option was elected that were 90 days or more past due.
Concentrations of credit risk
Concentrations of credit risk may arise from trading, securities financing transactions and underwriting
activities, and may be impacted by changes in political or economic factors. Nomura has credit risk
concentrations on bonds issued by the Japanese Government, U.S. Government, Governments within theEuropean Union (“EU”), their states and municipalities, and their agencies. These concentrations generally arise
from taking trading positions and are reported within Trading assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
Government, agency and municipal securities, including Securities pledged as collateral, represented 18% of
total assets as of March 31, 2012 and 22% as of March 31, 2013.

F-57

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables present geographic allocations of Nomura’s trading assets related to government,
agency and municipal securities. See Note 3 “Derivative instruments and hedging activities” for further
information regarding the concentration of credit risk for derivatives.

Japan

Government, agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥2,304Japan

Government, agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥3,403

Billions of yen
March 31, 2012
U.S.
EU
Other

¥1,319¥448¥6,598Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
U.S.
EU
Other

Total(1)¥1,313¥2,527

Total(1)¥3,262¥556¥8,534(1) Other than above, there were ¥640 billion and ¥715 billion of government, agency and municipal securities
in Other assets—Non-trading debt securities as of March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The vast majorityof these securities are Japanese government, agency and municipal securities.
Estimated fair value of financial instruments not carried at fair value
Certain financial instruments are not carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance
sheets since they are neither held for trading purposes nor are elected for the fair value option. These are typicallycarried at contractual amounts due or amortized cost.
The carrying value of the majority of the financial instruments detailed below will approximate fair value
since they are short-term in nature and contain minimal credit risk. These financial instruments include financial
assets reported within Cash and cash equivalents, Time deposits, Deposits with stock exchanges and other
segregated cash, Receivables from customers, Receivables from other than customers, Securities purchased
under agreements to resell and Securities borrowed and financial liabilities reported within Short-termborrowings, Payables to customers, Payables to other than customers, Deposits received at banks, Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase, Securities loaned and Other secured borrowings in the consolidatedbalance sheets. These would be generally classified in either Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The estimated fair values of other financial instruments which are longer-term in nature or may containmore than minimal credit risk may be different to their carrying value. Financial assets of this type primarily
include certain loans which are reported within Loans receivable while financial liabilities primarily include
long-term borrowings which are reported within Long-term borrowings. The estimated fair value of loans
receivable which are not elected for the fair value option is estimated in the same way as other loans carried atfair value on a recurring basis. Where quoted market prices are available, such market prices are utilized toestimate fair value. The fair value of long-term borrowings which are not elected for the fair value option isestimated in the same way as other borrowings carried at fair value on a recurring basis using quoted market
prices where available or by DCF valuation techniques. All of these financial assets and financial liabilities
would be generally classified in Level 2 or Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy using the same methodology as
is applied to these instruments when they are elected for the fair value option.

F-58

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables present carrying values, fair values and classification within the fair value hierarchy forcertain classes of financial instrument of which a portion of the ending balance was carried at fair value as ofMarch 31, 2012 and 2013.
Billions of yen
March 31, 2012(1)Fair value by level
Carrying
value

Assets:Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 1,071
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
653
Deposits with stock exchanges and other segregatedcash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
230
Loans receivable(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,290
Securities purchased under agreements to resell . . . . . . . .
7,663
Securities borrowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,080
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥16,987
Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 1,186
Deposits received at banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
905
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase . . . . . . . . .
9,928
Securities loaned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,700Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,505
Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥22,224

Fair value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

¥ 1,071653¥1,071
—

¥

—
653

¥—
—

230
1,286
7,663
6,080
¥16,983————¥1,071

230
1,031
7,663
6,080
¥15,657

—
255
—
—
¥255

¥ 1,186
905
9,928
1,700
8,242
¥21,961¥ —¥ 1,186
—
905
—
9,928
—
1,700
154
8,084
¥ 154 ¥21,803

¥ 0
—
—
—
4
¥ 4

Billions of yen
March 31, 2013(1)Fair value by level

Assets:Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deposits with stock exchanges and other segregatedcash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans receivable(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities purchased under agreements to resell . . . . . . . . .
Securities borrowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deposits received at banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase . . . . . . . . .
Securities loaned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Carrying
value

Fair value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

¥

¥

805
578

¥ 805
—

¥

—
578

¥—
—

270
1,575
8,295
5,820
¥17,343

270
1,576
8,295
5,820
¥17,344

—
—
—
—
¥ 805

270
1,352
8,295
5,820
¥16,315

—
224
—
—
¥224

¥

¥

¥—
—
—
—
114
¥ 114

¥

¥

805
578

738
1,072
12,4442,159
7,592¥24,005738
1,072
12,444
2,159
7,430¥23,843(1) Includes financial instruments which are carried at fair value on a recurring basis.
(2) Carrying values are shown after deducting allowance for loan losses.
F-59

734
1,071
12,440
2,159
7,093¥23,497

4
1
4

—
223
¥232

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
In addition to financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis, Nomura also measures otherfinancial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, where the primarymeasurement basis is not fair value. Fair value is only used in specific circumstances after initial recognition suchas to measure impairment.
For the year ended March 31, 2012, certain land and buildings were measured at fair value on anonrecurring basis. The carrying amount of these assets, which are reported within Other assets—Officebuildings, land, equipment and facilities in the consolidated balance sheets, were written down to their fair valueof ¥17 billion as a result of impairment. Fair value was determined based on internal appraisal value andconsequently, this nonrecurring fair value measurement has been determined using valuation inputs which would
be classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
For the year ended March 31, 2013, goodwill allocated to a certain reporting unit was measured at fair value
on a nonrecurring basis. The relevant goodwill, which is reported within Other assets—Other in the consolidatedbalance sheets, was wholly impaired. Fair value was determined based on DCF and consequently, thisnonrecurring fair value measurement has been determined using valuation inputs which would be classified in
Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
3. Derivative instruments and hedging activities:
Nomura uses a variety of derivative financial instruments, including futures, forwards, options and swaps,
for both trading and non-trading purposes.
Derivatives used for trading purposes
In the normal course of business, Nomura enters into transactions involving derivative financial instruments
to meet client needs, for trading purposes, and to reduce its own exposure to loss due to adverse fluctuations ininterest rates, currency exchange rates and market prices of securities. These financial instruments include
contractual agreements such as commitments to swap interest payment streams, exchange currencies or purchaseor sell securities and other financial instruments on specific terms at specific future dates.
Nomura maintains active trading positions in a variety of derivative financial instruments. Most of
Nomura’s trading activities are client oriented. Nomura utilizes a variety of derivative financial instruments as ameans of bridging clients’ specific financial needs and investors’ demands in the securities markets. Nomura also
actively trades securities and various derivatives to assist its clients in adjusting their risk profiles as marketschange. In performing these activities, Nomura carries an inventory of capital markets instruments and maintains
its access to market liquidity by quoting bid and offer prices to and trading with other market makers. These
activities are essential to provide clients with securities and other capital markets products at competitive prices.
Futures and forward contracts are commitments to either purchase or sell securities, foreign currency orother capital market instruments at a specific future date for a specified price and may be settled in cash or
through delivery. Foreign exchange contracts include spot and forward contracts and involve the exchange of twocurrencies at a rate agreed by the contracting parties. Risks arise from the possible inability of counterparties tomeet the terms of their contracts and from movements in market prices. Futures contracts are executed throughregulated exchanges which clear and guarantee performance of counterparties. Accordingly, credit risk
associated with futures contracts is considered minimal. In contrast, forward contracts are generally negotiatedbetween two counterparties and, therefore, are subject to the performance of the related counterparties.
F-60

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Options are contracts that grant the purchaser, for a premium payment, the right to either purchase or sell afinancial instrument at a specified price within a specified period of time or on a specified date from or to thewriter of the option. The writer of options receives premiums and bears the risk of unfavorable changes in themarket price of the financial instruments underlying the options.
Swaps are contractual agreements in which two counterparties agree to exchange certain cash flows, at
specified future dates, based on an agreed contract. Certain agreements may result in combined interest rate andforeign currency exposures. Entering into swap agreements may involve the risk of credit losses in the event ofcounterparty default.
To the extent these derivative financial instruments are economically hedging financial instruments or
securities positions of Nomura, the overall risk of loss may be fully or partly mitigated by the hedged position.
Nomura seeks to minimize its exposure to market risk arising from its use of these derivative financial
instruments through various control policies and procedures, including position limits, monitoring proceduresand hedging strategies whereby Nomura enters into offsetting or other positions in a variety of financial
instruments. Credit risk associated with these financial instruments is controlled by Nomura through credit
approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. To reduce default risk, Nomura requires collateral, principally cash
collateral and government securities, for certain derivative transactions. From an economic standpoint, Nomura
evaluates default risk exposure net of related collateral. Furthermore, for OTC derivatives, Nomura generally
enters into International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. master agreements or their equivalents (“Master
Netting Agreements”) with each of its counterparties. Master Netting Agreements provide a right of offset in theevent of bankruptcy and mitigate the credit risk exposure from these transactions. In some cases, they enable
unrealized gains and losses arising from Nomura’s dealings in OTC derivatives to be presented on a net-bycounterparty basis and on a net-by-cash collateral basis in accordance with ASC 210-20.
Nomura offset ¥1,051 billion of cash collateral receivables against net derivative liabilities and ¥867 billionof cash collateral payables against net derivative assets as of March 31, 2012. Cash collateral receivables andcash collateral payables of ¥191 billion and ¥335 billion, respectively, have not been offset against net
derivatives as of March 31, 2012.
Nomura offset ¥985 billion of cash collateral receivables against net derivative liabilities and ¥1,033 billionof cash collateral payables against net derivative assets as of March 31, 2013. Cash collateral receivables andcash collateral payables of ¥220 billion and ¥497 billion, respectively, have not been offset against net
derivatives as of March 31, 2013.
Derivatives used for non-trading purposes
Nomura’s principal objectives in using derivatives for non-trading purposes are to manage interest rate risk,
to modify the interest rate characteristics of certain financial liabilities, to manage net investment exposure tofluctuations in foreign exchange rates arising from certain foreign operations and to mitigate equity price risk
arising from certain stock-based compensation awards given to employees.
Credit risk associated with derivatives utilized for non-trading purposes is controlled and managed in thesame way as credit risk associated with derivatives utilized for trading purposes.
Nomura designates derivative financial instruments as fair value hedges of interest rate risk arising from
specific financial liabilities. These derivatives are effective in reducing the risk associated with the exposure
being hedged and they are highly correlated with changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged item, both atinception and throughout the life of the hedge contract. Changes in fair value of the hedging derivatives arereported together with those of the hedged liabilities through the consolidated statements of income withinInterest expense.
F-61

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of the net investment in foreign operations relate tospecific subsidiaries with non-Japanese yen functional currencies. When determining the effectiveness of net
investment hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the hedging derivative is determined bychanges in spot exchange rates and is reported through Nomura Holdings, Inc. (“NHI”) shareholders’ equity
within Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Changes in fair value of the hedging derivatives
attributable to changes in the difference between the forward rate and spot rate are excluded from the measure ofhedge effectiveness and are reported in the consolidated statements of income within Revenue—Other.
Concentrations of credit risk for derivatives
The following tables present Nomura’s significant concentration of exposures to credit risk in OTC
derivatives with financial institutions. The gross fair value of derivative assets represents the maximum amountof loss due to credit risk that Nomura would incur if the counterparties of Nomura failed to perform inaccordance with the terms of the instruments and any collateral or other security Nomura held in relation to those
instruments proved to be of no value.

Gross fair value ofderivative assets

Financial institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥18,881

Gross fair value ofderivative assets

Financial institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥20,169

F-62

Billions of yen
March 31, 2012
Impact ofmaster netting Impact ofagreements
collateral¥(17,553)¥(797)

Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
Impact ofmaster netting Impact ofagreements
collateral¥(18,415)¥(981)Net exposure tocredit risk

¥531

Net exposure tocredit risk

¥773

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Derivative activities
The following table quantifies the volume of Nomura’s derivative activity through a disclosure of notionalamounts, in comparison with the fair value of those derivatives. All amounts are disclosed on a gross basis, prior
to counterparty netting of derivative assets and liabilities and cash collateral netting against net derivatives.
Billions of yen
March 31, 2012
Derivative assets
Derivative liabilities
Notional
Fair value Notional(1) Fair value(1)Derivatives used for trading and non-trading purposes(2)(3):
Equity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 16,079
636,833
37,06759,29650¥ 1,603
18,843
1,864
1,356
4

¥ 14,497
592,413
41,78562,99945¥ 1,687
18,597
1,952
1,407
5

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥749,325¥23,670¥711,739¥23,648

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥

1,855
190

¥

78
4

¥

—
97

¥

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥

2,045

¥

82

¥

97

¥

Total derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥751,370¥23,752¥711,836—1
1¥23,649

Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
Derivative assets
Derivative liabilities
Notional
Fair value Notional(1) Fair value(1)Derivatives used for trading and non-trading purposes(2)(3):
Equity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 14,130
727,12944,58281,00229¥ 1,857
21,685
1,839
2,104
1

¥ 14,550
711,91442,88980,28039¥ 2,017
21,452
1,979
2,007
2

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥866,872¥27,486¥849,672¥27,457

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥

1,748
92

¥

88
1

¥

162
24

¥

0
1

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥

1,840

¥

89

¥

186

¥

1

Total derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥868,712¥27,575¥849,858¥27,458(1) Includes the amount of embedded derivatives bifurcated in accordance with ASC 815.
(2) Each derivative classification includes derivatives referencing multiple risk components. For example,
interest rates contracts include complex derivatives referencing interest rate risk as well as foreign exchange
risk or other factors such as prepayment rates. Credit contracts include credit default swaps as well asderivatives referencing corporate and government securities.
F-63

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)(3) As of March 31, 2012 and 2013, the amounts reported include derivatives used for non-trading purposes
which are not designated as fair value or net investment hedges. These amounts have not been separately
presented since such amounts were not significant.
Changes in fair value are recognized either through earnings or other comprehensive income depending on
the purpose for which the derivatives are used.
Derivatives used for trading purposes
Derivative financial instruments used for trading purposes, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, arecarried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized through the consolidated statements of income within
Revenue—Net gain on trading.
The following table presents amounts included in the consolidated statements of income related toderivatives used for trading and non-trading purposes by type of underlying derivative contract.
Billions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Derivatives used for trading and non-trading purposes(1)(2):
Equity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 206 ¥(137) ¥ (69)
132
42
65
88
(73)
(18)
(171)
(67) (329)
(10)
(4)
(0)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 245¥(239) ¥(351)(1) Each derivative classification includes derivatives referencing multiple risk components. For example,
interest rates contracts include complex derivatives referencing interest rate risk as well as foreign exchange
risk or other factors such as prepayment rates. Credit contracts include credit default swaps as well asderivatives referencing corporate and government securities.
(2) Includes net gains (losses) on derivatives used for non-trading purposes which are not designated as fairvalue or net investment hedges. For the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, these amounts havenot been separately presented as net gains (losses) for these non-trading derivatives were not significant.
Fair value hedges
Nomura issues Japanese yen and foreign currency denominated debt with both fixed and floating interest
rates. Nomura generally enters into swap agreements to convert fixed rate interest payments on its debt
obligations to a floating rate and applies fair value hedge accounting to these instruments. Derivative financial
instruments designated as fair value hedges are carried at fair value. Changes in fair value of the hedging
derivatives are recognized together with those of the hedged liabilities in the consolidated statements of income
within Interest expense.

F-64

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table presents amounts included in the consolidated statements of income related toderivatives designated as fair value hedges by type of underlying derivative contract and the nature of the hedged
item.
Billions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 22

¥ 76

¥ 33

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 22

¥ 76

¥ 33

Hedged items:
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥(22)

¥(76)

¥(33)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥(22)

¥(76)

¥(33)

Net investment hedges
Nomura designates foreign currency forwards and foreign currency denominated long-term debt as hedgesof certain subsidiaries with significant foreign exchange risks and applies hedge accounting to these instruments.
Accordingly, the effective hedging portion of the foreign exchange gains (losses) arising from the derivative
contracts and non-derivative financial products designated as hedges is recognized through the consolidated
statements of comprehensive income within Other comprehensive income (loss)—Change in cumulativetranslation adjustments, net of tax. This is offset by the foreign exchange adjustments arising from consolidationof the relevant foreign subsidiaries.
The following table presents gains (losses) from derivatives and non-derivatives designated as net
investment hedges included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Billions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 0
17

¥(1)
4

¥(14)
(15)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥17

¥3

¥(29)

(1) The portion of the gains (losses) representing the amount of hedge ineffectiveness and the amount excluded
from the assessment of hedge effectiveness are recognized within Revenue—Other in the consolidated
statements of income. The amount of gains (losses) was not significant during the years ended March 31,
2011, 2012 and 2013.
Derivatives containing credit risk related contingent features
Nomura enters into certain OTC derivatives and other agreements containing credit-risk-related contingent
features. These features would require Nomura to post additional collateral or settle the instrument uponoccurrence of a credit event, the most common of which would be a downgrade in the Company’s long-term
credit rating.
F-65

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are ina liability position as of March 31, 2012, was ¥912 billion with related collateral pledged of ¥732 billion. In theevent of a one-notch downgrade to Nomura’s long-term credit rating in effect as of March 31, 2012, theaggregate fair value of assets that would have been required to be posted as additional collateral or that would
have been needed to settle the instruments immediately was ¥77 billion.
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are ina liability position as of March 31, 2013, was ¥960 billion with related collateral pledged of ¥754 billion. In theevent of a one-notch downgrade to Nomura’s long-term credit rating in effect as of March 31, 2013, theaggregate fair value of assets that would have been required to be posted as additional collateral or that would
have been needed to settle the instruments immediately was ¥102 billion.
Credit derivatives
Credit derivatives are derivative instruments in which one or more of their underlyings are related to thecredit risk of a specified entity (or group of entities) or an index based on the credit risk of a group of entities that
expose the seller of credit protection to potential loss from credit risk related events specified in the contract.
Written credit derivatives are instruments or embedded features where Nomura assumes third party credit
risk, either as guarantor in a guarantee-type contract, or as the party that provides credit protection in an optiontype contract, credit default swap, or any other credit derivative contract.
Nomura enters into credit derivatives as part of its normal trading activities as both purchaser and seller ofprotection for credit risk mitigation, proprietary trading positions and for client transactions.
The most significant type of credit derivatives used by Nomura are single-name credit default swaps wheresettlement of the derivative is based on the credit risk of a single third party. Nomura also writes credit
derivatives linked to the performance of credit default indices and issues other credit risk related portfolio
products.
Nomura would have to perform under a credit derivative contract if a credit event as defined in therespective contract occurs. Typical credit events include bankruptcy, failure to pay and restructuring of
obligations of the reference asset.
Credit derivative contracts written by Nomura are either cash or physically settled. In cash-settled
instruments, once payment is made upon an event of a default, the contract usually terminates with no further
payments due. Nomura generally has no right to assume the reference assets of the counterparty in exchange forpayment, nor does Nomura usually have any direct recourse to the actual issuers of the reference assets torecover the amount paid. In physically settled contracts, upon a default event, Nomura takes delivery of thereference asset in return for payment of the full notional amount of the contract.
Nomura actively monitors and manages its credit derivative exposures. Where protection is sold, risks may
be mitigated by purchasing credit protection from other third parties either on identical underlying reference
assets or on underlying reference assets with the same issuer which would be expected to behave in a correlated
fashion. The most common form of recourse provision to enable Nomura to recover from third parties any
amounts paid under a written credit derivative is therefore not through the derivative itself but rather through theseparate purchase of credit derivatives with identical or correlated underlyings.
F-66

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Nomura quantifies the value of these purchased contracts in the following tables in the column titled“Purchased Credit Protection”. These amounts represent purchased credit protection with identical underlyings to
the written credit derivative contracts which act as a hedge against Nomura’s exposure. To the extent Nomura isrequired to pay out under the written credit derivative, a similar amount would generally become due to Nomura
under the purchased hedge.
Credit derivatives have a stated notional amount which represents the maximum payment Nomura may berequired to make under the contract. However, this is generally not a true representation of the amount Nomura
will actually pay as in addition to purchased credit protection, other risk mitigating factors reduce the likelihood
and amount of any payment, including:
The probability of default: Nomura values credit derivatives taking into account the probability that theunderlying reference asset will default and that Nomura will be required to make payments under the contract.
Based on historical experience and Nomura’s assessment of the market, Nomura believes that the probability that
all reference assets on which Nomura provides protection will default in a single period is remote. The disclosed
notional amount, therefore, significantly overstates Nomura’s realistic exposure on these contracts.
The recovery value on the underlying asset: In the case of a default, Nomura’s liability on a contract islimited to the difference between the notional amount and the recovery value of the underlying reference asset.
While the recovery value on a defaulted asset may be minimal, this does reduce amounts paid on these contracts.
Nomura holds assets as collateral in relation to written credit derivatives. However, these amounts do notenable Nomura to recover any amounts paid under the credit derivative but rather mitigate the risk of economic
loss arising from a counterparty defaulting against amounts due to Nomura under the contract. Collateralrequirements are determined on a counterparty level rather than individual contract, and also generally cover all
types of derivative contracts rather than just credit derivatives.
The following tables present information about Nomura’s written credit derivatives and purchased credit
protection with identical underlyings as of March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013.

Single-name credit default
swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit default indices . . . . . .
Other credit risk related
portfolio products . . . . . . .
Credit risk related options
and swaptions . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Billions of yen
March 31, 2012
Maximum potential payout/NotionalYears to maturity
Less than
1 to 33 to 5More than
1 yearyears
years
5 years

Purchased
creditprotection¥1,997
1,175¥18,692
9,334

Notional

Carrying value(Asset) / Liability(1)

Total

¥562
124

¥20,159
10,738¥2,902
1,667

223

3,298

1,084

1,201

441

572

2,138

(1)

781

0

—

439

342

651

¥908

¥34,976¥5,653¥10,040¥15,197¥4,086¥30,815

F-67¥ 6,750 ¥ 8,510
2,089
5,807

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Single-name credit default
swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit default indices . . . . . .
Other credit risk related
portfolio products . . . . . . .
Credit risk related options
and swaptions . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
Maximum potential payout/NotionalYears to maturity
Less than
1 to 33 to 5More than
1 yearyears
years
5 years

Purchased
creditprotection

Notional

Carrying value(Asset) / Liability(1)

Total

¥210
(16)

¥24,659
12,722¥4,575
1,482¥ 7,961
3,555¥ 9,877
6,815¥2,246870¥22,431
11,592

230

2,586

666

1,112

215

593

1,710

0

51

—

—

27

24

42

¥424

¥40,018¥6,723¥12,628¥16,934¥3,733¥35,775(1) Carrying value amounts are shown on a gross basis prior to cash collateral or counterparty netting.
The following tables present information about Nomura’s written credit derivatives by external credit ratingof the underlying asset. Ratings are based on Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”), or if not rated
by S&P, based on Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. If ratings from either of these agencies are not available, theratings are based on Fitch Ratings Ltd. or Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. For credit default indices, the rating
is determined by taking the weighted average of the external credit ratings given for each of the underlying
reference entities comprising the portfolio or index.
Billions of yen
March 31, 2012
Maximum potential payout/Notional
A
BBB
BB
Other(1)AAA

AA

Single-name credit default swaps . . . . . . . . .
Credit default indices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other credit risk related portfolio
products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit risk related options and swaptions . .

¥2,196140¥1,749711¥ 5,878
5,358¥ 5,550
2,905¥2,974
1,619¥1,812
5¥20,159
10,738

20
0

18
0

3
137

111
532

212
112

2,934
—

3,298
781

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥2,356¥2,478¥11,376¥ 9,098¥4,917¥4,751¥34,976

Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
Maximum potential payout/Notional
A
BBB
BB
Other(1)

Total

AAA

AA

Total

Single-name credit default swaps . . . . . . . . .
Credit default indices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other credit risk related portfolio
products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit risk related options and swaptions . .

¥2,40014¥1,594589¥ 5,945
6,360¥ 8,208
3,516¥4,073
1,910¥2,439333¥24,659
12,722

77
—

17
—

9
18

127
—

243
33

2,113
—

2,586
51

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥2,491¥2,200¥12,332¥11,851¥6,259¥4,885¥40,018(1) “Other” includes credit derivatives where the credit rating of the underlying reference asset is below
investment grade or where a rating is unavailable.
F-68

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
4. Private equity business:
Nomura makes private equity investments primarily in Japan and Europe.
Private equity investments made by certain entities which Nomura consolidates under either a votinginterest or variable interest model which are investment companies pursuant to the provisions of ASC 946(“investment company subsidiaries”) are accounted for at fair value, with changes in fair value recognizedthrough the consolidated statements of income. Investment company accounting applied by each of theseinvestment company subsidiaries is retained in these consolidated financial statements within this annual report.
These entities make private equity investments solely for capital appreciation, current income or both rather
than to generate strategic operating benefits to Nomura. In accordance with Nomura investment policies,
non-investment companies within the group may not make investments in entities engaged in non-corebusinesses if such investments would result in consolidation or application of the equity method of accounting.
Such investments may generally only be made by investment company subsidiaries. Non-core businesses aredefined as those engaged in activities other than Nomura’s business segments.
Nomura also has a subsidiary which is not an investment company but which makes investments in entities
engaged in Nomura’s core businesses. These investments are made for capital appreciation or current income
purposes or both and are also carried at fair value, either because of election of the fair value option or other U.S.
GAAP requirements.
Private equity business in Japan
Nomura has an established private equity business in Japan, which has been operated primarily through awholly-owned subsidiary, Nomura Principal Finance Co., Ltd (“NPF”). NPF is an investment company
subsidiary pursuant to the provisions of ASC 946 and therefore has carried all of its investments at fair value,with changes in fair value recognized through the consolidated statements of income.
Since its inception in 2000, NPF has made investments in 21 entities, however, Nomura exited from the
majority of these investments for the year ended March 31, 2012 and as a result, the fair value of its investment
portfolio as of March 31, 2012 was ¥789 million. Nomura exited from the remaining investments held by NPF
during the year ended March 31, 2013, therefore, the fair value of its investment portfolio was ¥nil as ofMarch 31, 2013.
Nomura also makes private equity investments through another wholly-owned subsidiary, Nomura Financial
Partners Co., Ltd. (“NFP”), NFP is not an investment company subsidiary as it invests in entities engaged in
Nomura’s core business. Nomura elected the fair value option to account for its 47.0% investment in thecommon stock of Ashikaga Holdings.
Private equity business in Europe
In Europe, Nomura’s private equity investments primarily comprise legacy investments made by its former
Principal Finance Group (“PFG”) now managed by Terra Firma (collectively referred to as the “Terra Firma
Investments”), investments in other funds managed by Terra Firma (“Other Terra Firma Funds”) and throughother investment company subsidiaries (“Other Investments”).
Terra Firma Investments
Following a review to determine the optimum structure for Nomura’s European private equity business, on
March 27, 2002, Nomura restructured PFG and, as a result, contributed its investments in certain of its remaining
F-69

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
investee companies to Terra Firma Capital Partners I (“TFCP I”), a limited partnership which is engaged in theprivate equity business, in exchange for a limited partnership interest. Terra Firma Investments (GP) Limited, thegeneral partner of TFCP I, which is independent of Nomura, assumed the management and control of theseinvestments, together with one other PFG investment, Annington Holdings plc (“Annington”), which due tocontractual restrictions was not transferred to the partnership.
With effect from March 27, 2002, Nomura ceased consolidating the Terra Firma Investments and accounted
for those investments at fair value in accordance with ASC 946.
The Terra Firma Investments are held by entities which are investment company subsidiaries and therefore
Nomura had accounted for these investments at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through theconsolidated statements of income.
In December 2012, Nomura completed the sale of Annington to Terra Firma and as a result, the fair value of
the Terra Firma Investments fell from ¥102,649 million as of March 31, 2012 to ¥nil as of March 31, 2013.
Other Terra Firma Funds
In addition to the Terra Firma Investments, Nomura is a 10% investor in a ¥234 billion private equity fund(“TFCP II”) and a 2% investor in a ¥623 billion private equity fund (“TFCP III”), also raised and managed by
Terra Firma Capital Partners Limited.
Nomura’s total commitment for TFCP II was originally ¥23,362 million and reduced to ¥4,001 million as aresult of adjustments for recyclable distributions. As of March 31, 2013, ¥3,957 million had been drawn down forinvestments.
For TFCP III, Nomura’s total commitment was ¥11,793 million and ¥11,094 million had been drawn down
for investments as of March 31, 2013.
The investments in TFCP II and TFCP III are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognizedthrough the consolidated statements of income.
Other Investments
Nomura also makes private equity investments in Europe through wholly-owned subsidiaries and otherconsolidated entities which have third party pooling of funds. Certain of these entities are investment company
subsidiaries and therefore all of their investments are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognizedthrough the consolidated statements of income.
5. Investment company accounting
Certain entities, including NPF, are investment companies and therefore carry all of their investments at fairvalue, with changes in fair value recognized through the consolidated statements of income.

F-70

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table summarizes the aggregate fair value and the cost of investments held by all investmentcompany subsidiaries within Nomura and for which investment company accounting has been retained in these
consolidated financial statements.
Millions of yen
March 312012
2013

Closing cost(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross unrealized appreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross unrealized depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 31,691 ¥24,393
110,600
11,711(9,971) (7,277)

Closing fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥132,320¥28,827(1) Cost is defined as the historical cost of each investment (i.e. purchase price) as adjusted for subsequent
additional investment.
The following table summarizes performance of the investments held by investment company subsidiaries
during the period.

2011

Millions of yen
March 31
2012

2013

Opening fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase / (sales) of investees during the period(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Realized gains / (losses) during the period(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in unrealized gains / (losses) during the period(3) . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥267,168 ¥ 208,754 ¥ 132,320(70,292) (109,724) (127,396)
10,07035,931
19,181
1,808(2,641)
4,722

Closing fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥208,754¥ 132,320¥ 28,827(1) Acquisition cost of new investees and additional investments or sales proceeds of investees disposed ofduring the period.
(2) Realized gains and losses are calculated as the difference between sales proceeds and the carrying values.
(3) Includes the effect of foreign exchange movements.
6. Collateralized transactions:
Nomura enters into collateralized transactions, including resale and repurchase agreements, securities
borrowed and loaned transactions, and other secured borrowings mainly to meet clients’ needs, finance trading
inventory positions and obtain securities for settlements. Under these transactions, Nomura either receives orprovides collateral, including Japanese and non-Japanese government, agency, mortgage-backed, bank andcorporate debt securities and equities. In many cases, Nomura is permitted to use the securities received to secure
repurchase agreements, enter into securities lending transactions or to cover short positions with counterparties.
Securities borrowed transactions generally require Nomura to provide the counterparty with collateral in the formof cash or other securities. For securities loaned transactions, Nomura generally receives collateral in the form of
cash or other securities. Nomura monitors the market value of the securities borrowed or loaned and requires
additional cash or securities, as necessary, to ensure that such transactions are adequately collateralized.

F-71

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The fair value of securities received as collateral, securities borrowed with collateral and securities
borrowed without collateral which Nomura is permitted to sell or repledge and the portion that has been sold or
repledged are as follows.
Billions of yen
March 312012
2013

The fair value of securities received as collateral, securities borrowed as collateral andsecurities borrowed without collateral where Nomura is permitted by contract or custom
to sell or repledge the securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The portion of the above that has been sold (reported within Trading liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheets) or repledged . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥32,075¥35,281

23,89528,488

Nomura pledges firm-owned securities to collateralize repurchase agreements and other secured financings.
Pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the secured party, including Gensaki Repo transactions, arereported in parentheses as Securities pledged as collateral within Trading assets in the consolidated balance
sheets. Assets owned, which have been pledged as collateral, primarily to stock exchanges and clearingorganizations, without allowing the secured party the right to sell or repledge them, are summarized in the tables
below.
Millions of yen
March 312012
2013

Trading assets:
Equities and convertible securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 47,966 ¥ 86,108
Government and government agency securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,333,482
1,314,277
Bank and corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
139,863
161,233
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
40,18333,723
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,527,946
1,674,898
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) and other(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
82,29884,065Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—16,335
Deposits with stock exchanges and other segregated cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—4,110¥3,171,738
Non-trading debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥Investments in and advances to affiliated companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥(1) Includes CLO and ABS those on credit card loans, auto loans and student loans.

F-72¥3,374,749

54,969 ¥33,921 ¥49,811
37,636

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Assets subject to lien, except for those disclosed above, are as follows.
Millions of yen
March 3120122013

Loans and receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 55,236 ¥706
Trading assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,515,079
1,208,753
Office buildings, land, equipment and facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
116,530
955
Non-trading debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
337,681
315,781
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
260,683
83¥2,285,209¥1,526,278

Assets in the above table were primarily pledged for secured borrowings, including other secured
borrowings, collateralized borrowings of consolidated VIEs and trading balances of secured borrowings, andderivative transactions. See Note 13 “Borrowings” for further information regarding trading balances of secured
borrowings.
7. Non-trading securities:
Non-trading securities held by Nomura’s insurance subsidiary are carried at fair value within Other assets—
Non-trading debt securities and Other assets—Other in the consolidated balance sheets, and unrealized changes
in fair value are reported net-of-tax within Other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements ofcomprehensive income. Realized gains and losses on non-trading securities are recognized within Revenue—
Other in the consolidated statements of income.
The following tables present information regarding the cost and/or amortized cost, gross unrealized gains
and losses and fair value of non-trading securities held by Nomura’s insurance subsidiary as of March 31, 2012
and 2013.
Millions of yen
March 31, 2012
Cost and/or
amortized cost

Unrealized gains and losses
Gross unrealized gains Gross unrealized losses

Fair value

Government, agency and municipal
securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥150,203
37,35653,358

¥ 445
115
3,194

¥ 164
182
2,069

¥150,484
37,28954,483

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥240,917¥3,754¥2,415¥242,256

Cost and/or
amortized cost

Millions of yen
March 31, 2013
Unrealized gains and losses
Gross unrealized gains Gross unrealized losses

Fair value

Government, agency and municipal
securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥177,374
54,032
39,997¥ 5,294726
12,923

¥126
86
109

¥182,542
54,672
52,811

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥271,403¥18,943¥321¥290,025

F-73

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the year ended March 31, 2012, non-trading securities of ¥317,806 million were disposed of resulting in¥6,331 million of realized gains and ¥1,282 million of realized losses. Total proceeds received from thesedisposals were ¥322,855 million. For the year ended March 31, 2013, non-trading securities of ¥525,965 million
were disposed of resulting in ¥12,050 million of realized gains and ¥1,134 million of realized losses. Total
proceeds received from these disposals were ¥536,881 million. Related gains and losses were computed using the
average method.
The following table presents an analysis of the fair value of non-trading debt securities by residual
contractual maturity as of March 31, 2013. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as certain
securities contain features that allow redemption of the securities prior to their contractual maturity.

Total

Millions of yen
March 31, 2013
Years to maturity
Less than 1 year 1 to 5 years 5 to 10 years More than 10 years

Non-trading debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥237,214¥36,906¥84,878¥98,199¥17,231

The following tables present the fair value and gross unrealized losses of non-trading securities aggregatedby the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of March 31,
2012 and 2013.

Government, agency and municipal
securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Government, agency and municipal
securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less than 12 months
Grossunrealized
Fair value
lossesMillions of yen
March 31, 2012
More than 12 months
Grossunrealized
Fair value
lossesFair valueGrossunrealized
losses¥14,954
5,920
21,049¥41,923

¥ —
—
—
¥ —

¥14,954
5,920
21,049¥41,923

¥ 164
182
2,069
¥2,415

¥ 164
182
2,069
¥2,415

¥—
—
—
¥—

Total

Less than 12 months
Grossunrealized
Fair value
lossesMillions of yen
March 31, 2013
More than 12 months
Grossunrealized
Fair value
lossesFair valueGrossunrealized
losses¥56,400
10,404
1,517¥68,321¥2,903——¥2,903¥59,303
10,404
1,517¥71,224

¥ 126
86
109
¥ 321

¥

80
86
109
¥ 275

¥ 46
—
—
¥ 46

Total

As of March 31, 2012, the total number of non-trading securities in unrealized loss positions wasapproximately 70. As of March 31, 2013, the total number of non-trading securities in unrealized loss positions
was approximately 80.
F-74

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized for nontrading equity securities and reported within Revenue—Other were ¥1,078 million and ¥4,900 million,
respectively. For the year ended March 31, 2013 the credit loss component of other-than-temporary impairment
losses recognized for non-trading debt securities were not significant. For the year ended March 31, 2013, thenon-credit loss component of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized for certain non-trading debt
securities and reported within Other comprehensive income (loss) were ¥7 million. For the year ended
March 31, 2013, other gross unrealized losses of non-trading securities were considered temporary.
8. Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities:
Securitizations
Nomura utilizes special purpose entities (“SPEs”) to securitize commercial and residential mortgage
loans, government agency and corporate securities and other types of financial assets. Those SPEs areincorporated as stock companies, Tokumei kumiai (silent partnerships), Cayman special purpose companies(“SPCs”) or trust accounts. Nomura’s involvement with SPEs includes structuring SPEs, underwriting,
distributing and selling debt instruments and beneficial interests issued by SPEs to investors. Nomura accounts
for the transfer of financial assets in accordance with ASC 860. This statement requires that Nomura accounts forthe transfer of financial assets as a sale when Nomura relinquishes control over the assets. ASC 860 deems
control to be relinquished when the following conditions are met: (a) the assets have been isolated from thetransferor (even in bankruptcy or other receivership), (b) the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange theassets received, or if the transferee is an entity whose sole purpose is to engage in securitization or asset-backed
financing activities, the holders of its beneficial interests have the right to pledge or exchange the beneficial
interests, and (c) the transferor has not maintained effective control over the transferred assets. Nomura may
retain an interest in the financial assets, including residual interests in the SPEs. Any such interests are accounted
for at fair value and reported within Trading assets in Nomura’s consolidated balance sheets, with the change infair value reported within Revenue-Net gain on trading. Fair value for retained interests in securitized financial
assets is determined by using observable prices; or in cases where observable prices are not available for certain
retained interests, Nomura estimates fair value based on the present value of expected future cash flows using its
best estimates of the key assumptions, including forecasted credit losses, prepayment rates, forward yield curves
and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. Nomura may also enter into derivative transactions inrelation to the assets transferred to an SPE.
As noted above, Nomura may have continuing involvement with SPEs to which Nomura transferred assets.
For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, Nomura received cash proceeds from SPEs in new securitizationsof ¥349 billion and ¥407 billion, respectively, and the amounts of associated profit on sale were not significant.
For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, Nomura received debt securities issued by these SPEs with an
initial fair value of ¥1,336 billion and ¥1,783 billion, respectively, and cash inflows from third parties on the saleof those debt securities of ¥723 billion and ¥951 billion, respectively. The cumulative balance of financial assets
transferred to SPEs with which Nomura has continuing involvement was ¥3,782 billion and ¥4,109 billion as ofMarch 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Nomura’s retained interests were ¥165 billion and ¥300 billion as ofMarch 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, Nomura received cash
flows of ¥14 billion and ¥26 billion, respectively, from the SPEs on the retained interests held in the SPEs.
Nomura had outstanding collateral service agreements and written credit default swap agreements in the amountof ¥27 billion and ¥18 billion as of March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Nomura does not provide financial
support to SPEs beyond its contractual obligations.

F-75

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables present the fair value of retained interests where Nomura has continuing involvementin SPEs and their classification in the fair value hierarchy, categorized by the type of transferred assets.
Billions of yen
March 31, 2012

Government, agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank and corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage and mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Investment
grade

¥—
—
—
¥—

¥163
—
—
¥163

¥—
0
2
¥ 2

¥163
0
2
¥165

¥161
—
2
¥163

2
0
—
¥ 2

Other

¥

Billions of yen
March 31, 2013

Government, agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank and corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage and mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Investment
grade

Other

¥—
—
—
¥—

¥296
—
2
¥298

¥—
0
2
¥ 2

¥296
0
4
¥300

¥296
—
2
¥298

¥—
0
2
¥ 2

The following table presents the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value of the retainedinterests and the sensitivity of this fair value to immediate adverse changes of 10% and 20% in thoseassumptions.
Billions of yen, except percentages
Material retained interests held(1)as of March 31
2012
2013

Fair value of retained interests(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average life (Years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Constant prepayment rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impact of 10% adverse change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impact of 20% adverse change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impact of 10% adverse change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impact of 20% adverse change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥157
7.0
8.1%
(1.3)
(2.4)
3.3%
(3.7)
(7.1)

¥ 288
6.0
10.1%
(2.6)
(5.0)
3.6%
(4.2)
(8.2)

(1) The sensitivity analysis covers the material retained interests held of ¥157 billion out of ¥165 billion as ofMarch 31, 2012 and ¥288 billion out of ¥300 billion as of March 31, 2013. Nomura considers the amount or
the probability of anticipated credit loss from the retained interests which Nomura continuously holds would
be minimal.
Changes in fair value based on 10% or 20% adverse changes generally cannot be extrapolated since therelationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. The impact of a change ina particular assumption is calculated holding all other assumptions constant. For this reason, concurrent changes
in assumptions may magnify or counteract the sensitivities disclosed above. The sensitivity analyses arehypothetical and do not reflect Nomura’s risk management practices that may be undertaken under those stressscenarios.

F-76

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table presents the type and carrying value of financial assets included within Trading assets
which have been transferred to SPEs but which do not meet the criteria for derecognition under ASC 860. Thesetransfers are accounted for as secured financing transactions and generally reported within Long-termborrowings. The assets are pledged as collateral of the associated liabilities and cannot be removed unilaterally
by Nomura and the liabilities are non-recourse to Nomura.
Billions of yen
March 31
2012
2013

AssetsTrading assets
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage and mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥116
84
27
21

¥ 72
86
24
8

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥248

¥190

Liabilities
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥223

¥177

Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”)
In the normal course of business, Nomura acts as a transferor of financial assets to VIEs, and underwriter,
distributor, and seller of repackaged financial instruments issued by VIEs in connection with its securitizationand equity derivative activities. Nomura retains, purchases and sells variable interests in VIEs in connection withits market-making, investing and structuring activities. Nomura consolidates VIEs for which Nomura is theprimary beneficiary, including those that were created to market structured securities to investors by repackaging
corporate convertible securities, mortgages and mortgage-backed securities. Certain VIEs used in connection
with Nomura’s aircraft leasing business as well as other purposes are consolidated. Nomura also consolidates
certain investment funds, which are VIEs, and for which Nomura is the primary beneficiary.

F-77

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table presents the classification of consolidated VIEs’ assets and liabilities in these
consolidated financial statements. The assets of a consolidated VIE may only be used to settle obligations of that
VIE. Creditors do not have any recourse to Nomura beyond the assets held in the VIEs.
Billions of yen
March 3120122013

Consolidated VIE assets
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading assets
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage and mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities purchased under agreements to resell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Office buildings, land, equipment and facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated VIE liabilities
Trading liabilities
Debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥

52

¥ 13

730
180
84
0
4
1
7
140(2)
408(2)

353
200
138
—
3
1
12
17
64

¥1,606

¥801

¥

4
38
0

¥

992
35

458
7

¥1,069

¥490

6
15
4

(1) Includes aircraft purchase deposits of ¥17 billion and ¥16 billion as of March 31, 2012 and 2013,
respectively. In relation to these aircraft purchase deposits, certain of these SPEs have commitments topurchase aircraft. See Note 22 “Commitments, contingencies and guarantees” for further information.
(2) Includes real estate and real estate for sale held by SPEs related to a consolidated subsidiary. That subsidiary
was de-consolidated during the year ended March 31, 2013.
Nomura also holds variable interests in VIEs where Nomura is not the primary beneficiary. Nomura’s
variable interests in such VIEs include senior and subordinated debt, residual interests, and equity interests
associated with commercial and residential mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securitizations andstructured financings, equity interests in VIEs which were formed primarily to acquire high yield leveraged loans
and other lower investment grade debt obligations, residual interests in operating leases for aircraft held by VIEs,
and loans and investments in VIEs that acquire operating businesses.

F-78

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables present the carrying amount of variable interests of unconsolidated VIEs andmaximum exposure to loss associated with these variable interests. Maximum exposure to loss does not reflect
Nomura’s estimate of the actual losses that could result from adverse changes, nor does it reflect the economic
hedges Nomura enters into to reduce its exposure. The risks associated with VIEs in which Nomura is involved
are limited to the amount recorded in the consolidated balance sheets, the amount of commitments and financial
guarantees and the notional amount of the derivative instruments. Nomura believes the notional amount ofderivative instruments generally exceeds the amount of actual risk.
Billions of yen
March 31, 2012
Carrying amount of variable interests
AssetsLiabilities

Trading assets and liabilities
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage and mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments to extend credit and other guarantees . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥Maximum exposure
to loss tounconsolidated VIEs

58
133
2,137
96
0
25

¥—
—
—
—
—

58
133
2,137
96
27
25

2
29
5
—

—
—
—
—

2
29
5
19

9

¥2,531¥2,485¥

9¥Billions of yen
March 31, 2013
Carrying amount of variable interests
AssetsLiabilities

Trading assets and liabilities
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage and mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Private equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments to extend credit and other guarantees . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥Maximum exposure
to loss tounconsolidated VIEs

65
173
2,843
161
0
28

¥—
—
—
—
—
—

¥

65
173
2,843
161
18
28

7
82
4
—

—
—
—
—

7
82
4
33

¥3,363¥—¥3,414

9. Financing receivables:
In the normal course of business, Nomura extends financing to clients primarily in the form of collateralized
agreements such as reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing transactions and loans. These
financing receivables are recognized as assets on Nomura’s consolidated balance sheets and provide a contractual
right to receive money either on demand or on future fixed or determinable dates.
F-79

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Collateralized agreements
Collateralized agreements consist of reverse repurchase agreements disclosed as Securities purchased underagreements to resell and securities borrowing transactions disclosed as Securities borrowed in the consolidatedbalance sheets, including those executed under Gensaki Repo agreements. Reverse repurchase agreements andsecurities borrowing transactions principally involve the buying of government and government agency securities
from customers under agreements that also require Nomura to resell these securities to those customers. Nomura
monitors the value of the underlying securities on a daily basis to the related receivables, including accrued
interest, and requests or returns additional collateral when appropriate. Reverse repurchase agreements andsecurities borrowing transactions are generally recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at the amount at
which the securities are purchased with applicable accrued interest. No allowance for credit losses is generally
recorded on these transactions due to the strict collateralization requirements.
Loans receivable
The key types of loans receivable recognized by Nomura are loans at banks, short-term secured marginloans, inter-bank money market loans and corporate loans.
Loans at banks include both retail and commercial secured and unsecured loans extended by licensed
banking entities within Nomura such as The Nomura Trust & Banking Co., Ltd and Nomura Bank International
plc. For both retail and commercial loans secured by real estate or securities, Nomura is exposed to the risk of adecline in the value of the underlying collateral. Loans at banks also include unsecured commercial loans
provided to investment banking clients for relationship purposes. Nomura is exposed to risk of default of thecounterparty, although these counterparties usually have high credit ratings. Where loans are secured byguarantees, Nomura is also exposed to the risk of default by the guarantor.
Short-term secured margin loans are loans provided to clients in connection with securities brokeragebusiness. These loans provide funding for clients in order to purchase securities. Nomura requests initial margin
in the form of acceptable collateral securities or deposits against these loans and holds the purchased securities as
collateral through the life of the loans. If the value of the securities declines by more than specified amounts,
Nomura can make additional margin calls in order to maintain a specified ratio of loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio.
For these reasons, the risk to Nomura of providing these loans is limited.
Inter-bank money market loans are loans to financial institutions in the inter-bank money market, where
overnight and intra-day financings are traded through money market dealers. The risk to Nomura of making theseloans is not significant as only qualified financial institutions can participate in these markets and these loans areusually overnight or short-term in nature.
Corporate loans are primarily commercial loans provided to corporate clients extended by non-licensed
banking entities within Nomura. Corporate loans include loans secured by real estate or securities, as well as
unsecured commercial loans provided to investment banking clients for relationship purposes. The risk to
Nomura of making these loans is similar to those risks arising from commercial loans reported in loans at banks.
In addition to the loans above, Nomura has advances to affiliated companies which are loans provided torelated parties of Nomura. As these loans are generally not secured, Nomura is exposed to the risk of default of
the counterparty.

F-80

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables present a summary of loans receivable reported within Loans receivable or Investments
in and advances to affiliated companies in the consolidated balance sheets by portfolio segment.
Millions of yen
March 31, 2012
Carried at
Carried atamortized cost fair value(1)TotalLoans receivable
Loans at banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term secured margin loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inter-bank money market loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥235,407
165,246
95,461
338,906¥ 50,109——408,243¥ 285,516
165,246
95,461
747,149

Total loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥835,020¥458,352¥1,293,372

Advances to affiliated companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10,649—10,649Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥845,669¥458,352¥1,304,021

Millions of yen
March 31, 2013
Carried at
Carried atamortized cost fair value(1)TotalLoans receivable
Loans at banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term secured margin loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inter-bank money market loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 263,608
288,574
76,968422,295¥

153——
523,896¥ 263,761
288,574
76,968946,191

Total loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,051,445¥524,049¥1,575,494

Advances to affiliated companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12,376—

12,376

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,063,821¥524,049¥1,587,870(1) Includes loans receivable and loan commitments carried at fair value through election of the fair value
option.
There were no significant purchases or sales of loans receivable and no reclassifications of loans receivable
to trading assets during the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2013.

F-81

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Allowance for loan losses
Management establishes an allowance for loan losses for loans carried at amortized cost which reflects
management’s best estimate of probable losses incurred. The allowance for loan losses which is reported in the
consolidated balance sheets within Allowance for doubtful accounts comprises two components:•

A specific component for loans which have been individually evaluated for impairment; and•A general component for loans which, while not individually evaluated for impairment, have beencollectively evaluated for impairment based on historical loss experience

The specific component of the allowance for loan losses reflects probable losses incurred within loans whichhave been individually evaluated for impairment. A loan is defined as being impaired when, based on current
information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement will not be collected. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include anassessment of the ability of borrowers to pay by considering various factors such as the nature of the loan, priorloan loss experience, current economic conditions, the current financial situation of the borrower and the fairvalue of any underlying collateral. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays or insignificant payment
shortfalls are not classified as impaired. The impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by adjusting thecarrying value of the loan to either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s
effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateraldependent.
The general component of the allowance for loan losses is for loans not individually evaluated for
impairment and includes judgment about collectability based on available information at the balance sheet date
and the uncertainties inherent in those underlying assumptions. The allowance is based on historical loss
experience adjusted for qualitative factors such as current economic conditions.
While management has based its estimate of the allowance for loan losses on the best information available,
future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary as a result of changes in the economic
environment or variances between actual results and original assumptions.
Loans are charged-off when Nomura determines that the loans are uncollectible. This determination is basedon factors such as the occurrence of significant changes in the borrower’s financial position such that theborrower can no longer pay the obligation or that the proceeds from collateral will not be sufficient to pay theloans.

F-82

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables present changes in the allowance for losses for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012
and 2013.
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31, 2011
Allowance for loan losses
Short-term
Allowance for
Total
securedInter-bank
Advances toreceivables
allowanceLoansmarginmoney
Corporate affiliatedother than for doubtful
at banksloans
market loans
loanscompanies Subtotalloans
accounts

Opening balance . . . . . . . . ¥ 783
Provision forlosses . . . . . . . . . . . (253)
Charge-offs . . . . . . . .
(32)
Other(1) . . . . . . . . . . . (159)¥ 25

Ending balance . . . . . . . . . ¥ 339¥

5¥3,576¥—¥4,389¥1,036¥5,425

13
—
(1)

(5)
—
—

(599)
—
445

11
—
—

(833)
(32)
285

143
(59)
(69)

(690)
(91)
216

¥ 37

¥—

¥3,422¥ 11¥3,809¥1,051¥4,860Millions of yen
Year ended March 31, 2012
Allowance for loan losses
Short-term
Allowance for
Total
securedInter-bank
Advances toreceivables
allowanceLoansmarginmoney
Corporate affiliatedother than for doubtful
at banksloans
market loans
loanscompanies Subtotalloans
accounts

Opening balance . . . . . . .
Provision forlosses . . . . . . . . .
Charge-offs . . . . . . .
Other(1) . . . . . . . . . .

¥339

¥ 37

¥—

¥3,422¥ 11¥3,809¥1,051¥4,860

213
—
—

(11)
(2)
(0)

—
—
—

(592)
—
(72)

40
—
—

(350)
(2)
(72)

20
(1)
433

(330)
(3)
361

Ending balance . . . . . . . .

¥552

¥ 24

¥—

¥2,758¥ 51¥3,385¥1,503¥4,888Millions of yen
Year ended March 31, 2013
Allowance for loan losses
Short-term
Allowance for
Total
securedInter-bank
Advances toreceivables
allowanceLoansmarginmoney
Corporate affiliatedother than for doubtful
at banksloans
market loans
loanscompanies Subtotalloans
accounts

Opening balance . . . . . .
Provision forlosses . . . . . . . . .
Charge-offs . . . . . .
Other(1) . . . . . . . . . .

¥552

¥ 24

¥—

¥ 2,758¥ 51¥ 3,385¥1,503¥ 4,888

238
(1)
—

13
(11)
0

—
—
—

(2,630)
(26)
(7)

(22)
—
—

(2,401)
(38)
(7)

(13)
—
(171)

(2,414)(38)(178)

Ending balance . . . . . . .

¥789

¥ 26

¥—

¥

¥ 29

¥

¥1,319¥ 2,258(1) Includes the effect of foreign exchange movements.

F-83

95

939

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables present the allowance for loan losses and loans by impairment methodology and typeof loans as of March 31, 2012 and 2013.
Millions of yen
March 31, 2012

Loans atbanks

Allowance by impairment methodology
Evaluated individually . . . . . . . . . . . ¥Evaluated collectively . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . ¥

14
538
552

Loans by impairment methodology
Evaluated individually . . . . . . . . . . . ¥212
Evaluated collectively . . . . . . . . . . . . 235,195
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥235,407

Advances
Short-term
Inter-banktosecured margin
money
Corporate affiliatedloansmarket loans
loanscompanies

¥
¥

10
14
24

¥ 58,636
106,610¥165,246

¥
¥

—
—
—

¥95,461—¥95,461¥ 2,680 ¥78¥ 2,758 ¥

— ¥
51
51 ¥

Total

2,704
681
3,385

¥329,312 ¥ 394 ¥ 484,015
9,594 10,255
361,654¥338,906 ¥10,649 ¥ 845,669

Millions of yen
March 31, 2013

Loans atbanks

Allowance by impairment methodology
Evaluated individually . . . . . . . . . . . ¥Evaluated collectively . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . ¥

6
783
789

Loans by impairment methodology
Evaluated individually . . . . . . . . . . . ¥76
Evaluated collectively . . . . . . . . . . . . 263,532
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥263,608

Advances
Short-term
Inter-banktosecured margin
money
Corporate affiliatedloansmarket loans
loanscompanies

¥
¥

—
26
26

¥ 83,399
205,175¥288,574

F-84

¥
¥

—
—
—

¥76,968—¥76,968

¥
¥

7 ¥
88
95 ¥

— ¥
29
29 ¥

Total

13
926
939

¥412,675 ¥ 5,595 ¥ 578,713
9,620
6,781
485,108¥422,295 ¥12,376 ¥1,063,821

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Nonaccrual and past due loans
Loans which are individually evaluated as impaired are assessed for nonaccrual status in accordance with
Nomura’s policy. When it is determined to suspend interest accrual as a result of an assessment, any accrued but
unpaid interest is reversed. Loans are generally only returned to an accrual status if the loan is brought
contractually current, i.e. all overdue principal and interest amounts are paid. In limited circumstances, a loan
which has not been brought contractually current will also be returned to an accrual status if all principal andinterest amounts contractually due are reasonably assured of repayment within a reasonable period of time orthere has been a sustained period of repayment performance by the borrower.
As of March 31, 2012, there were ¥40,565 million of loans which were on a nonaccrual status, primarily
unsecured corporate loans. The amount of loans which were 90 days past due was not significant.
As of March 31, 2013, there were ¥5,855 million of loans which were on a nonaccrual status, primarily
secured corporate loans. The amount of loans which were 90 days past due was not significant.
Once a loan is impaired and placed on a nonaccrual status, interest income is subsequently recognized using
the cash basis method.
Loan impairment and troubled debt restructurings
In the ordinary course of business, Nomura may choose to recognize impairment and also restructure a loanclassified as held for investment either because of financial difficulties of the borrower, or simply as a result ofmarket conditions or relationship reasons. A troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) occurs when Nomura (aslender) for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties grants a concession to theborrower that Nomura would not otherwise consider.
Any loan being restructured under a TDR will generally already be identified as impaired with an applicableallowance recognized in the allowance for loan losses. If not (for example if the loan is collectively assessed for
impairment with other loans), the restructuring of the loan under a TDR will immediately result in the loan as
being classified as impaired. An impairment loss for a loan restructuring under a TDR which only involves
modification of the loan’s terms (rather than receipt of assets in full or partial settlement) is calculated in thesame way as any other impaired loan. Assets received in full or partial satisfaction of a loan in a TDR arerecognized at fair value.
As of March 31, 2012, the amount of loans which were classified as impaired but against which noallowance for loan losses had been recognized was not significant. For impaired loans with a related allowance,
the amount of recorded investment was ¥35,721 million, the total unpaid principal balance was ¥38,103 million
and the related allowance was ¥2,693 million, primarily for unsecured corporate loans.
As of March 31, 2013, the amount of loans which were classified as impaired but against which noallowance for loan losses had been recognized was not significant. For impaired loans with a related allowance,
the amount of recorded investment, the total unpaid principal balance and the related allowance was not
significant.
The amount of TDRs which occurred during the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, was not significant.

F-85

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Credit quality indicators
Nomura is exposed to credit risks deriving from a decline in the value of loans or a default caused bydeterioration of creditworthiness or bankruptcy of the borrower. Nomura’s risk management framework for suchcredit risks is based on a risk assessment through an internal credit rating process, in depth pre-financing credit
analysis of each individual loan and continuous post-financing monitoring of borrower’s creditworthiness. Loansconsidered as collateralized transactions are not subject to an internal credit rating process as Nomura monitors
the value of posted collateral closely and understands means to prevent potential losses.
The following tables present an analysis of each class of loans not carried at fair value using Nomura’sinternal ratings or equivalent credit quality indicators applied by subsidiaries as of March 31, 2012 and 2013.

AAA-BBB

Millions of yen
March 31, 2012
BB-CCC
CC-D
Others(1)Secured loans at banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unsecured loans at banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term secured margin loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Secured inter-bank money market loans . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unsecured inter-bank money market loans . . . . . . . . . . .
Secured corporate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unsecured corporate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advances to affiliated companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 92,207
80,507—
1,461
94,000131,767
1,339
10,255¥ 29,169————
93,331
37,580
—

¥ —
13
—
—
—
4,232
—
—

¥ 33,511—
165,246——
70,657—394¥154,887
80,520165,246
1,461
94,000299,987
38,91910,649Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥411,536¥160,080¥4,245¥269,808¥845,669

AAA-BBB

Millions of yen
March 31, 2013
BB-CCC
CC-D
Others(1)

Total

Total

Secured loans at banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥105,199 ¥ 30,826 ¥ —¥ 33,208 ¥ 169,233
Unsecured loans at banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
93,2661,103
6—94,375
Short-term secured margin loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
———288,574
288,574
Secured inter-bank money market loans . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,968
—
—
—
1,968
Unsecured inter-bank money market loans . . . . . . . . . .
75,000———75,000
Secured corporate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
220,189
164,205
7,969
3,570
395,933
Unsecured corporate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—26,362——
26,362
Advances to affiliated companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,781
527
—
5,068
12,376
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥502,403¥223,023¥7,975¥330,420¥1,063,821(1) Relate to collateralized exposures where a specified ratio of LTV is maintained.
Nomura reviews internal counterparty credit ratings at least once a year by using available borrower’s credit
information including financial statements and other information. Internal counterparty credit ratings are also
reviewed more frequently for high-risk borrowers or problematic exposures and any significant credit event of acounterparty will trigger an immediate credit review process.

F-86

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
10. Leases:
Lessor
Nomura leases office buildings and aircraft in Japan and overseas. These leases are classified as operatingleases and the related assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, except for land, which is stated atcost in the consolidated balance sheets and reported within Other assets—Office buildings, land, equipment andfacilities.
A portion of such rentals is paid from Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. (“NRI”), an affiliated company. See
Note 21 “Affiliated companies and other equity-method investees” for more information.
The following table presents the lease deposits and rents received from NRI.
Millions of yen
As of or for the year ended
March 31
2011
2012
2013

Lease deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rental income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥——¥11,738
3,848

¥ —
4,272

The following table presents the types of assets which Nomura leases under operating leases.

Cost

Millions of yen
March 31, 2013
Accumulated Net carrying
depreciation
amountReal estate(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Aircraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 3,426
17,872¥(1,215)(1,332)¥ 2,211
16,540Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥21,298¥(2,547)¥18,751(1) Cost, accumulated depreciation and net carrying amounts include amounts relating to real estate space
utilized by Nomura.
Nomura recognized rental income of ¥2,747 million, ¥66,180 million and ¥78,667 million for the years
ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively in the consolidated statements of income within Revenue—
Other.
The future minimum lease payments to be received on noncancelable operating leases as of March 31, 2013was ¥7,187 million and this future minimum lease payments to be received are scheduled as below:
Millions of yen
Years of receipt

Minimum lease payments to be received . . . . . . .

Total

Less
than 1year

1 to 2years

2 to 3years

3 to 4years

4 to 5years

More than
5 years¥7,187¥1,350¥1,239¥1,166¥581¥490¥2,361LesseeNomura leases its office spaces, certain employees’ residential facilities and other facilities in Japan andoverseas primarily under cancelable operating lease agreements which are customarily renewed upon expiration.
F-87

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Nomura also leases certain equipment and facilities in Japan and overseas under non-cancelable operating leaseagreements. Rental expenses, net of sublease rental income, for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
were ¥48,957 million, ¥43,536 million and ¥46,975 million, respectively. A portion of such rental expenses was
paid to Nomura Land and Building Co., Ltd. (“NLB”) that became a consolidated subsidiary of Nomura in May
2011.
The following table presents lease deposits and rents paid to NLB.
Millions of yen
As of or for the year ended
March 31
2011
2012
2013

Lease deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rental expenses(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥4,229
4,358

¥—
622

¥—
—

(1) Rental expenses for the year ended March 31, 2012 were those paid to NLB for the period before NLB was
consolidated.
The following table presents the future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases
with remaining terms exceeding one year as of March 31, 2013:
Millions of yen
March 312013

Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Sublease rental income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥154,254(9,338)Net minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥144,916

The future minimum lease payments above are scheduled as below as of March 31, 2013:

Minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . .

Total

Less than
1 year¥154,254¥17,801

Millions of yen
Years of payment
1 to 2
2 to 33 to 4
years
years
years

¥16,503¥14,393¥11,200

4 to 5years

More than
5 years¥10,585¥83,772

Nomura leases certain equipments and facilities office in Japan and overseas under capital lease agreements.
If the lease is classified as a capital lease, Nomura recognizes the real estate at the lower of its fair value or
present value of minimum lease payments, which is reported within Other Assets—Office buildings, land,
equipment and facilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The balances of capital lease assets as of March 31,
2012 and 2013 were ¥27,902 million and ¥24,170 million, respectively.
The following table presents the future minimum lease payments under capital leases as of March 31, 2013:
Millions of yen
March 312013

Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 54,036(28,483)

Present value of net lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 25,553

F-88

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The future minimum lease payments above are scheduled as below as of March 31, 2013:

Minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

Less than
1 year¥54,036¥497

Millions of yen
Years of payment
1 to 2
2 to 33 to 4
years
years
years

4 to 5years

More than
5 years¥405¥3,454¥43,177¥2,992¥3,511

Certain leases contain renewal options or escalation clauses providing for increased rental payments based
upon maintenance, utilities and tax increases.
11. Business combinations:
During the year ended March 31, 2013, there were no significant business combinations.
For the purpose of streamlining Nomura’s management structure for faster decision-making in relation toreorganization, on May 13, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with one of its affiliated companies,
NLB to implement a share exchange (“Share Exchange Agreement”) effective on July 1, 2011. In advance of theeffective date of the Share Exchange Agreement, the Company acquired an additional 39.0% of the issued shares
of NLB (“Share Purchases”) as of May 24, 2011. As a result of the Share Purchases, NLB became a consolidated
subsidiary of Nomura during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Nomura’s total consideration in relation to
the Share Purchases was approximately ¥37,620 million. The difference between the fair value of the acquired
net assets of NLB and the acquisition cost was accounted for as a bargain purchase gain of ¥44,963 million
which is reported within Revenue—Other in the consolidated statements of income.
The Share Purchases were accounted for as a step acquisition in these consolidated financial statements,
because Nomura held 38.5% of the outstanding shares of NLB prior to the Share Purchases. Nomura remeasured
the previously held equity investments in NLB and other companies which were acquired as a result of the Share
Purchases at fair value. The change in fair value was a loss of ¥16,555 million which was reported within
Revenue—Other in the consolidated statements of income. The remeasurement to fair value was determinedprimarily based on the cost of the Share Purchases, in which the financial condition and assets of NLB wereconsidered in reference to the valuation results provided by third party appraisers. As of the date of the Share
Purchases, the previously held equity investments were remeasured at the fair value of ¥38,379 million. Further,equity investments in NLB previously held by other affiliated companies of Nomura were also remeasured at fairvalue, resulting in an additional loss of ¥4,109 million which was also reported within Revenue—Other in the
consolidated statements of income.
There were no other material acquisition-related costs incurred in connection with this businesscombination.
The operating results of NLB and other companies acquired as a result of the Share Purchases have been
included in the consolidated statements of income from May 2011 and revenue generated by NLB and theseother companies and net income from them which have been included in the consolidated statements of income
were ¥488,536 million, and ¥5,107 million for the year ended March 31, 2012. Such revenues are generally
reported in Revenue—Other.

F-89

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table provides a summary of the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed,
as of the date of the Share Purchases.
Millions of yen

Assets:Cash and cash deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans receivable(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Receivables from other than customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Office buildings, land, equipment and facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets other than above(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥78,63454,023
12,865
715,683
60,0481,290,121

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,211,374

Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities other than above . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82,800952,932
748,889

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,784,621

Equity attributable to NHI shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

120,962

Noncontrolling interests of NLB(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22,397

Noncontrolling interests attributable to other than shareholders of NLB(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

283,394

Acquisition costs and fair value of previously held equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

75,999Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ (44,963)(1) Valuation is based on the difference between the gross contractual amounts receivable of ¥54,131 million
and the estimate of the contractual cash flows not expected to be collected of ¥108 million.
(2) Includes finite-lived intangible assets related to client contracts and lease agreements which are amortizedbased on a weighted-average amortization period of nine years with no estimated residual value.
(3) Includes real estate classified as held for sale.
(4) Valuation is based on the acquisition cost of the Share Purchases.
(5) Valuation is based on either the market value or the net asset value as of the date of acquisition.
Based on the Share Exchange Agreement, 118 common shares of the Company were allotted and deliveredfor each share of NLB, and NLB became a wholly owned subsidiary of Nomura as of July 1, 2011. On the sameday, the Company issued 103,429,360 common shares. In addition, the common shares of NLB which theCompany acquired through the Share Exchange Agreement include the shares that had been held by one of
Nomura’s subsidiaries, Nomura Asset Management Co., Ltd., and the acquisition of those shares is accounted for
as a transaction between entities under common control.

F-90

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following selected (unaudited) pro-forma financial information presents revenue and net income (loss)
amounts as if the Share Purchases occurred on April 1, 2010.
Millions of yen,
except per share data
Year ended March 31
2011
2012

Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥2,011,241 ¥1,892,851
Net income (loss) attributable to NHI shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 58,533 ¥ (13,951)
Basic net income (loss) attributable to NHI shareholders per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16.13(3.83)
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to NHI shareholders per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16.06(3.83)
Revenue—Other in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 include
real estate sales of ¥251,377 million and ¥336,858 million generated by Nomura Real Estate Holdings Inc.
(“NREH”) which was a subsidiary of NLB. Revenues are recognized when the sales have closed, the buyer’s initialand continuing investments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the real estate and Nomura does
not have substantial continuing involvement in the real estate. The costs of real estate sales corresponding to theserevenues were ¥226,450 million and ¥306,570 million reported within Non-interest expenses—Other in the
consolidated statements of income. Nomura disposed of part of its investment in NREH in March 2013 andsubsequently accounts for its remaining investment using the equity method of accounting. Following
deconsolidation of NREH, real estate sales and costs of real estate will no longer be separately reported on a grossbasis in the consolidated statements of income within Revenue – Other and Non-interest expenses – Other,respectively and Nomura’s share of net income of NREH will be reported within Revenue – Other. See Note 21“Affiliated companies and other equity-method investees” for further information regarding NREH.
12. Other assets—Other / Other liabilities:
The following table presents Other assets-Other and Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets by type.
Millions of yen
March 31
2012
2013

Other assets—Other:
Securities received as collateral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill and other intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in equity securities for other than operating purposes(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities:
Obligation to return securities received as collateral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued expenses and provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥92,743 ¥ 47,739
160,227
115,661
201,244
145,602
113,006
71,813907,903(2) 221,344¥1,475,123¥602,159¥

92,743
16,169378,957
678,032¥ 47,739
56,353402,192
471,879¥1,165,901¥978,163(1) Includes marketable and non-marketable equity securities held for other than trading or operating purposes.
These investments were comprised of listed equity securities and unlisted equity securities of ¥58,460
million and ¥54,546 million respectively, as of March 31, 2012, and ¥50,930 million and ¥20,883 million
F-91

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
respectively, as of March 31, 2013. These securities are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value
recognized within Revenue—other in the consolidated statements of income.
(2) Includes real estate classified as held for sale which is carried at the lower of net book value or fair valueless cost to sell. For the year ended March 31, 2013, Nomura recognized losses of ¥32,019 million within
Non-interest expenses—Other for real estate classified as held for sale were fair value less cost to sell is
lower than net book value. As a result, Net income attributable to NHI shareholders for the year ended
March 31, 2013 decreased by ¥4,241 million.
(3) Includes liabilities relating to the investment contracts which were underwritten by Nomura’s insurance
subsidiary. As of March 31, 2012 and 2013, carrying values were ¥292,120 million and ¥281,864 million,
respectively, and estimated fair values were ¥294,242 million and ¥285,914 million, respectively. Fair value
is estimated by discounting future cash flows and using valuation inputs which would be generally classified
in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Goodwill is recognized upon completion of a business combination as the difference between the purchaseprice and the fair value of the net assets acquired. Subsequent to initial recognition, goodwill is not amortized but
is tested for impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more often if events or circumstances,such as adverse changes in the business climate, indicate there may be impairment.
Changes in goodwill, which are reported in the consolidated balance sheets within Other assets—Other, areas follows.
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2012
2013

Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increases due to business combinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥70,223 ¥74,034
4,898(4)——(8,293)(1)(1,087)
8,501

Balance at end of year(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥74,034¥74,242(1) For the year ended March 31, 2013, Nomura recognized a goodwill impairment loss relating to theWholesale segment of ¥8,293 million which was reported within Non-interest expenses—Other in the
consolidated statements of income, due to a decline in fair value of a reporting unit in the Wholesalesegment caused by the prolonged economic downturn. The fair value was determined based on DCF.
(2) Includes currency translation adjustments as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 of ¥(1,083) million and
8,501 million, respectively.
(3) The amounts attributable to the Wholesale segment as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 were ¥68,718 millionand ¥68,218 million, respectively. The amounts attributable to Other as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 were
¥5,316 million and ¥6,024 million, respectively.
(4) Relates to GE Capital Finance (China) Co., Ltd which is a subsidiary of Nomura Bank International plc.

F-92

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Intangible assets subject to amortization as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 are shown below.
Millions of yen
March 31, 2012
Gross carrying Accumulated
amountamortization

Client relationships . . . . . . . . .
Lease agreements . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 88,733
16,5001,126¥106,359¥(34,947)(1,445)(383)¥(36,775)

Net carrying
amountGross carrying
amountMarch 31, 2013
Accumulated
amortization

Net carrying
amount¥53,786
15,055743¥69,584¥62,586—644¥63,230¥(30,187)—(180)¥(30,367)¥32,399—464¥32,863

Amortization expenses for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were ¥5,031 million,¥19,129 million and ¥9,976 million, respectively. Estimated amortization expenses for the next five years areshown below.
Millions of yen
Estimated
amortization expense

Year ending March 31

2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥5,739
5,739
5,162
4,880
4,793

The amounts of other intangible assets not subject to amortization, which primarily including trademarks,
were ¥16,609 million and ¥8,556 million as of March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
13. Borrowings:
Short-term and long-term borrowings of Nomura as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 are shown below.
Millions of yen
March 3120122013

Short-term borrowings(1):Commercial paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings:
Long-term borrowings from banks and other financial institutions(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bonds and notes issued(3):Fixed-rate obligations:Japanese yen denominated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-Japanese yen denominated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Floating-rate obligations:Japanese yen denominated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-Japanese yen denominated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Index / Equity-linked obligations:Japanese yen denominated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-Japanese yen denominated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading balances of secured borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-93¥ 315,579
743,119
126,915¥1,185,613¥ 296,656
344,983
96,806¥ 738,445¥3,494,323¥2,631,019

1,124,504
860,975

1,303,757
1,079,275

788,224
117,121390,261
69,286

1,241,950
654,775
4,787,549
8,281,872
222,968¥8,504,840

1,296,966
644,414
4,783,959
7,414,978177,390¥7,592,368

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)(1) Includes secured borrowings of ¥8,647 million as of March 31, 2012 and ¥13,779 million as of March 31,
2013.
(2) Includes secured borrowings of ¥224,543 million as of March 31, 2012 and ¥3,039 million as of March 31,
2013.
(3) Includes secured borrowings of ¥757,018 million as of March 31, 2012 and ¥458,342 million as of March 31,
2013.
Trading balances of secured borrowings
These are liabilities recognized when a transfer of a financial asset does not meet the criteria for sales
accounting under ASC 860 and therefore the transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing. Theseborrowings are part of Nomura’s trading activities intended to generate profits from the distribution of financial
products secured by those financial assets.
Long-term borrowings consisted of the following:
Millions of yen
March 312012
2013

Debt issued by the Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt issued by subsidiaries—guaranteed by the Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt issued by subsidiaries—not guaranteed by the Company(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥3,178,278
2,076,721
3,249,841¥3,509,117
2,207,268
1,875,983

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥8,504,840¥7,592,368(1) Includes trading balances of secured borrowings.
As of March 31, 2012, fixed-rate long-term borrowings mature between 2012 and 2042 at interest rates
ranging from 0.10% to 10.00%. Floating-rate obligations, which are generally based on LIBOR, mature between
2012 and 2039 at interest rates ranging from 0.00% to 8.54%. Index / Equity-linked obligations mature between
2012 and 2042 at interest rates ranging from 0.00% to 32.50%.
As of March 31, 2013, fixed-rate long-term borrowings mature between 2013 and 2042 at interest rates
ranging from 0.00% to 11.00%. Floating-rate obligations, which are generally based on LIBOR, mature between
2013 and 2052 at interest rates ranging from 0.00% to 5.29%. Index / Equity-linked obligations mature between
2013 and 2043 at interest rates ranging from 0.00% to 42.50%.
Certain borrowing agreements of subsidiaries contain provisions whereby the borrowings are redeemable atthe option of the borrower at specified dates prior to maturity and include various equity-linked or other indexlinked instruments.
Nomura enters into swap agreements to manage its exposure to interest rates and foreign exchange rates.
Principally, debt securities and notes issued are effectively converted to LIBOR-based floating rate obligations
through such swap agreements. The carrying value of the long-term borrowings includes adjustments to reflect
fair value hedges.

F-94

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Following table presents the effective weighted-average interest rates of borrowings, including the effect offair value hedges as of March 31, 2012 and 2013.
March 3120122013

Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed-rate obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Floating-rate obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Index / Equity-linked obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0.43% 0.61%
1.34% 1.71%
2.04% 2.39%
0.90% 0.91%
1.22% 1.72%

Maturities of long-term borrowings
The following table presents the aggregate annual maturities of long-term borrowings, including
adjustments related to fair value hedges and liabilities measured at fair value, as of March 31, 2013:
Year ending March 31

Millions of yen

2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 and thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 701,517
1,320,270
1,140,710
693,281805,937
2,753,263

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7,414,978Trading balances of secured borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

177,390

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥7,592,368

Borrowing facilities
As of March 31, 2012 and 2013, Nomura had unutilized borrowing facilities of ¥138,301 million and¥77,935 million, respectively. The terms for these unutilized borrowing facilities do not significantly differ fromexisting borrowings.
Subordinated borrowings
As of March 31, 2012 and 2013, subordinated borrowings were ¥637,487 million and ¥562,137 million,
respectively.
14. Earnings per share:
Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) are presented on the face of the consolidated statements ofincome. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income attributable to NHI shareholders by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the year. The calculation of diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS,
except that the weighted average number of common shares is adjusted to reflect all dilutive instruments where
potential common shares are deliverable during the year. In addition, net income attributable to NHI shareholders
is adjusted for any change in income or loss that would result from the assumed conversion of dilutive
instruments issued by subsidiaries and affiliates.
F-95

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
A reconciliation of the amounts and the numbers used in the calculation of net income attributable to NHI
shareholders per share (basic and diluted) is as follows.
Millions of yen
except per share data presented in yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Basic—Net income attributable to NHI shareholders . . . . . . . .

¥28,661¥

11,583¥

107,234

Weighted average number of shares outstanding . . . . .
Net income attributable to NHI shareholders per
share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,627,798,587

3,643,481,439

3,692,795,953

¥

7.90

¥

3.18

¥

29.04

Diluted—
Net income attributable to NHI shareholders . . . . . . . .

¥28,642¥

11,561¥

107,181Weighted average number of shares outstanding . . . . .
Net income attributable to NHI shareholders per
share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,642,689,381

3,680,124,235

3,777,360,671

¥

¥

¥

7.86

3.14

28.37

Net income attributable to NHI shareholders was adjusted to reflect the decline in Nomura’s equity share of
earnings of subsidiaries and affiliates for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 arising from options topurchase common shares issued by subsidiaries and affiliates. The weighted average number of shares used in thecalculation of diluted EPS reflects the increase in potential issuance of common shares arising from stock-based
compensation plans by the Company, which would have minimal impact on EPS for the years ended March 31, 2011,2012 and 2013.
Antidilutive stock options to purchase 59,670,700, 24,840,700 and 10,880,700 common shares were notincluded in the computation of diluted EPS for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
The Company conducted a share buyback of 75,000,000 common shares which amounted to¥37,362 million from August 9, 2010 to August 31, 2010.
On July 1, 2011, the Company issued 103,429,360 common shares in accordance with NLB becoming awholly owned subsidiary of Nomura. See Note 11 “Business combinations” for further information.
Subsequent Events
The Company conducted a share buyback from May 8, 2013 to May 31, 2013. See Note 19 “Shareholders’equity” for further information.
On May 15, 2013, the Company adopted a resolution to issue SARs pursuant to the SAR Plan B awards. See
Note 16 “Deferred compensation plans” for further information.

F-96

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
15. Employee benefit plans:
Nomura provides various pension plans and other post-employment benefits which cover certain eligible
employees worldwide. In addition, Nomura provides health care benefits to certain active and retired employees
through its Nomura Securities Health Insurance Society (“NSHIS”).
Defined benefit pension plans—
The Company and certain subsidiaries in Japan (the “Japanese entities”) have contributory funded benefit
pension plans for eligible employees. The benefits are paid as annuity payments subsequent to retirement or as
lump-sum payments at the time of retirement based on the combination of years of service, age at retirement andemployee’s choice. The benefits under the plans are calculated based upon position, years of service and reason
for retirement. In addition to the plans described above, certain Japanese entities also have unfunded lump-sum
payment plans. Under these plans, employees with at least two years of service are generally entitled to lumpsum payments upon termination of employment. The benefits under the plans are calculated based upon position,
years of service and the reason for retirement. Nomura’s funding policy is to contribute annually the amountnecessary to satisfy local funding standards. In December 2008, certain contributory funded benefit pension plans
and unfunded lump-sum payment plans were amended and “cash balance pension plans” were introduced.
Participants receive an annual benefit in their cash balance pension plan account, which is computed based oncompensation of the participants, adjusted for changes in Japanese government bond rates. This plan amendment
contributed to a reduction in the benefit obligations of the subsidiaries.
Certain overseas subsidiaries have various local defined benefit plans covering certain employees. Nomura
recognized an asset for pension benefits for these plans amounting to ¥5,838 million and ¥9,067million as ofMarch 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Net periodic benefit cost
The net periodic benefit cost of the defined benefit plans includes the following components. Nomura’s
measurement date is March 31 for its defined benefit plans for Japanese entities.
Japanese entities’ plans—Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 9,328 ¥ 9,016 ¥ 9,322
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,480
4,649
4,302
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3,182) (3,262) (4,072)
Amortization of net actuarial losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,088
3,687
3,630
Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1,148) (1,479) (1,545)
Net periodic benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥12,566¥12,611¥11,637

The prior service cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of
active participants. Gains and losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the benefit obligation or the fair value ofplan assets are amortized over the average remaining service period of active participants.

F-97

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Benefit obligations and funded status
The following table presents a reconciliation of the changes in projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) and thefair value of plan assets, as well as a summary of the funded status.
Japanese entities’ plans—Millions of yen
As of or for the year ended March 31
2012
2013

Change in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition, divestitures and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥213,653
9,016
4,649
9,415
(14,785)
20,542(1)¥242,490
9,322
4,302
14,874(9,805)(26,784)(2)¥242,490¥234,399¥120,727
6,696
32,291(8,114)
8,052(1)¥159,652
20,91531,083(8,362)(11,614)(2)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥159,652¥191,674

Funded status at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(82,838)(42,725)

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ (82,838)¥ (42,725)

Projected benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition and divestitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1) Increased mainly because of a business combination during the period.
(2) Decreased mainly because of a deconsolidation during the period.
The accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) was ¥238,614 million and ¥231,321 million as of March 31,
2012 and 2013, respectively.
PBO, ABO, and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with ABO and PBO in excess of plan assets as ofMarch 31, 2012 and 2013 are set forth in the tables below.
Japanese entities’ plans—Millions of yen
March 312012
2013

Plans with ABO in excess of plan assets:
PBO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ABO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plans with PBO in excess of plan assets:
PBO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ABO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F-98¥242,490
238,614
159,652¥234,399
231,321
191,674¥242,490
238,614
159,652¥234,399
231,321
191,674

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income, pre-tax, that have not yet been recognized ascomponents of net periodic benefit cost consist of as follows.
Japanese entities’ plans—Millions of yen
For the year ended
March 31, 2013

Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 62,837(11,798)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 51,039

Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income, pre-tax, expected to be recognized as components of
net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are as follows.
Japanese entities’ plans—Millions of yen
For the year ending
March 31, 2014

Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 2,653(1,165)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 1,488

Assumptions
The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used to determine projected benefit
obligations at year end.
Japanese entities’ plans—
March 312012 2013

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of increase in compensation levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.8% 1.5%
2.8% 2.5%

The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used to determine Japanese entities’ plansnet periodic benefit costs for the year.
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of increase in compensation levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.1% 1.8% 1.5%
2.5% 2.8% 2.5%
2.6% 2.6% 2.6%

Generally, Nomura determines the discount rates for its defined benefit plans by referencing indices forlong-term, high-quality bonds and ensuring that the discount rate does not exceed the yield reported for thoseindices after adjustment for the duration of the plans’ liabilities.
F-99

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Nomura uses the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets to compute the expected return on assets.
Nomura’s approach in determining the long-term rate of return on plan assets is primarily based on historicalfinancial market relationships that have existed over time with the presumption that this trend will generally
remain constant in the future.
Plan assets
Plan assets are managed with an objective to generate sufficient long-term value in order to enable future
pension payouts. While targeting a long-term rate of return on plan assets, Nomura aims to minimize short-term
volatility by managing the portfolio through diversifying risk. Based on this portfolio policy, the plan assets areinvested diversely.
The plan assets of domestic plans target to invest 23% in equities (including private equity), 50% in debt
securities, 15% in life insurance company general accounts, and 12% in other investments. Investment
allocations are generally reviewed and revised at the time of the actual revaluation that takes place every five
years or when there is a significant change in prerequisites for the portfolio.
The following tables present information about the fair value of plan assets as of March 31, 2012 andMarch 31 2013 within the fair value hierarchy.
For details of the levels of inputs used to measure the fair value of plan assets, see Note 2 “Fair value
measurements”.
Japanese entities’ plans—Millions of yen
March 31, 2012
Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Balance as ofMarch 31, 2012

Pension plan assets:
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥27,230 ¥ —¥ —Private equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
9,802
Japanese government securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
59,867——
Japanese agency and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—219—
Foreign government securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
757——
Bank and corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
4,011
—
Investment trust funds and other(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—13,983
12,434
Life insurance company general accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—23,501—Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
7,848
—

¥ 27,230
9,802
59,867
219
757
4,011
26,41723,501
7,848

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥159,652

F-100¥87,854¥49,562¥22,236

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Millions of yen
March 31, 2013
Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Balance as ofMarch 31, 2013

Pension plan assets:
Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 30,568 ¥ —¥ —Private equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
——12,323
Japanese government securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
74,243——
Bank and corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
3,667
—
Investment trust funds and other(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—19,58615,035
Life insurance company general accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—26,448—Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
9,804
—

¥ 30,568
12,32374,243
3,667
34,621
26,448
9,804

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥191,674¥104,811¥59,505¥27,358(1) Includes hedge funds and real estate funds.
The fair value of the non-Japan plan assets as of March 31, 2012 was ¥32 million, ¥20,848 million and¥6,083 million for Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3, respectively. The fair value of the non-Japan plan assets as ofMarch 31, 2013 was ¥21 million, ¥25,296 million and ¥6,906 million for Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3,
respectively.
Level 1 plan assets primarily include equity securities and government securities. Unadjusted quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets that Nomura has the ability to access at the measurement date are classified
as Level 1. Level 2 plan assets primarily include investment trust funds, corporate debt securities and investments
in life insurance company’s general accounts. Investment trust funds are valued at their net asset values ascalculated by the sponsor of the funds. Investments in life insurance company’s general accounts are valued atconversion value.
The following tables present information about the plan assets for which Nomura has utilized significant
Level 3 valuation inputs to estimate fair value.
Japanese entities’ plans—

Balance
as ofApril 1,
2011

Millions of yen
Year ended March 31, 2012
Purchases /Net
Unrealized
sales and transfers in /and realizedother(out of)gains / loss
settlement
Level 3

Balance
as ofMarch 31,2012

Private equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 838
8,807

¥ 974
(353)

¥ 7,990
3,980

¥—
—

¥ 9,80212,434

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥9,645¥ 621¥11,970¥—¥22,236

F-101

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Balance
as ofApril 1,
2012

Millions of yen
Year ended March 31, 2013
Purchases /Net
Unrealized
sales and transfers in /and realizedother(out of)gains / loss
settlement
Level 3

Balance
as ofMarch 31,2013

Private equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment trust funds and other . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 9,80212,434¥2,479
1,131

¥

42
1,470

¥—
—

¥12,323
15,035

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥22,236¥3,610¥1,512¥—¥27,358

The fair value of Level 3 non-Japan plan assets, consisting of real estate funds and annuities, was¥6,083 million and ¥6,906 million as of March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The plan purchased¥4,416 million of Level 3 assets during the year ended March 31, 2012. The amounts of gains and losses,
purchases and sales other than above, transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 and Level 3 relating to these assets
during the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 were not significant.
Cash Flows
Nomura expects to contribute approximately ¥29,664 million to Japanese entities’ plans in the year ending
March 31, 2014 based upon Nomura’s funding policy to contribute annually the amount necessary to satisfy local
funding standards.
Expected benefit payments for the next five fiscal years and in aggregate for the five fiscal years thereafter
are as follows.
Japanese entities’ plans—Year ending March 31

Millions of yen

2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019-2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 9,284
9,558
10,193
10,214
10,65553,891

Defined contribution pension plans—
In addition to defined benefit pension plans, the Company, NSC and other Japanese and non-Japanesesubsidiaries have defined contribution pension plans.
Nomura contributed ¥3,233 million, ¥3,741 million and ¥3,600 million to defined contribution pension
plans for Japanese entities’ plans for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
The contributions to overseas defined contribution pension plans were ¥6,903 million, ¥7,882 million and¥7,448 million for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

F-102

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Health care benefits—
The Company and certain subsidiaries provide certain health care benefits to both active and retired
employees through NSHIS. The Company and certain subsidiaries also sponsor certain health care benefits toretired employees (“Special Plan”) and who participate in the Special Plan on a pay-all basis, i.e., by requiring aretiree contribution based on the estimated per capita cost of coverage. The Special Plan is a multi-employer
post-retirement plan because it is jointly administered by NSHIS and the Japanese government, and the funded
status of it is not computed separately. Therefore, although the Company and certain subsidiaries contribute some
portion of the cost of retiree health care benefits not covered through retiree contributions, the Company andcertain subsidiaries do not reserve for future costs. The health care benefit costs, which are equivalent to therequired contribution, amounted to ¥6,760 million, ¥7,614 million and ¥7,434 million for the years ended
March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
16. Deferred compensation plans:
Nomura issues compensation awards to senior management and other employees, certain of which arelinked to the Company’s share price, in order to retain and motivate key staff.
These stock-based compensation awards comprise Plan A and Plan B Stock Acquisition Rights (“SARs”),
Notional Stock Units (“NSUs”), Collared Notional Stock Units (“CSUs”) and Multi-Year Performance Deferral
Awards (“MYPD awards”). SAR Plan A awards are effectively awards of stock options while SAR Plan B
awards, NSUs and CSUs are analogous to awards of restricted stock. MYPD awards are performance-based
incentive awards for senior management linked to the profitability of Nomura. The Company also issues otherdeferred compensation awards, namely Notional Index Units (“NIUs”) which are linked to world stock index
quoted by Morgan Stanley Capital International.
SAR Plan A awards
The Company issues SAR Plan A awards over the Company’s common stock pursuant to several stock
option plans which vest and become exercisable two years after the grant date, and expire approximately sevenyears after the grant date, subject to forfeiture on termination of employment. The exercise price generally is notless than the fair value of the Company’s common stock on grant date.
The fair value of these stock options as of grant date is estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing
model and using the following assumptions:•

Expected volatilities based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock;•

Expected dividend yield based on the current dividend rate at the time of grant;•

Expected lives of the awards determined based on historical experience; and•The risk-free interest rate-estimate based on yen swap rate with a maturity equal to the expected lives of
options.

F-103

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The weighted-average grant date fair values of options granted during the years ended March 31, 2011,2012 and 2013 were ¥127, ¥48 and ¥78 per share, respectively. The weighted-average assumptions used in eachof the years were as follows:Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.51% 41.78% 43.11%
Expected dividends yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.73% 3.31% 2.12%
Expected lives (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6
6
7
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.76% 0.63% 0.45%
The following table presents activity relating to SAR Plan A awards for the year ended March 31, 2013:
Weighted-averageremaining life
until expiry(years)Outstanding(number of shares)

Weighted-average
exercise price

Outstanding as of March 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15,354,300
2,857,000(18,000)(171,000)(1,476,800)

¥ 988
298
478
896
1,120

3.9

Outstanding as of March 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16,545,500

¥ 848

3.8

Exercisable as of March 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10,880,700¥1,134

2.7

No SAR Plan A awards were exercised during the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2012. The total intrinsic
value of SAR Plan A awards exercised during the year ended March 31, 2013 was ¥2 million.
The aggregate intrinsic values of SAR Plan A awards outstanding and exercisable as of March 31, 2013
were ¥1,854 million and ¥277 million, respectively.
As of March 31, 2013, there was ¥215 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to SAR
Plan A awards. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years.
SAR Plan B awards
The Company issues SAR Plan B awards over the Company’s common stock pursuant to several stock unit
plans which vest and become exercisable approximately from one to five years after the grant date, and expire
approximately from six to ten years after the grant date. The exercise price is a nominal ¥1 per share.

F-104

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table presents activity relating to SAR Plan B awards for the year ended March 31, 2013:
Weighted-averageremaining life
until expiry(years)Outstanding(number of shares)

Weighted-Average
grant date fairvalue per share

Outstanding as of March 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

114,375,600
55,589,300(47,317,900)(5,103,600)

¥544
298
584
378

5.6

Outstanding as of March 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

117,543,400

¥419

5.7

Exercisable as of March 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15,856,000

¥714

4.1

The weighted-average grant date fair value per share for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 were¥638 and ¥397, respectively.
The total intrinsic values of SAR Plan B awards exercised during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and2013 were ¥3,934 million, ¥3,284 million and ¥15,299 million, respectively.
The aggregate intrinsic values of SAR Plan B awards outstanding and exercisable as of March 31, 2013
were ¥67,705 million and ¥9,133 million, respectively.
As of March 31, 2013, total unrecognized compensation cost relating to SAR Plan B awards was ¥10,365
million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.6 years. The total fair valuesof awards vested during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were ¥4,909 million, ¥3,868 million and¥3,624 million, respectively.
Total compensation expense recognized within Non-interest expenses—Compensation and benefits in the
consolidated statements of income relating to SAR Plan A and SAR Plan B awards for the years ended March 31,
2011, 2012 and 2013 was ¥18,638 million, ¥26,869 million and ¥19,091 million, respectively. Total related tax
benefits recognized in the consolidated statements of income for compensation expense for the years ended
March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was ¥546 million, ¥1,092 million and ¥1,081 million, respectively. The dilutive
effect of outstanding compensation plans is included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding usedin diluted EPS computations.
Cash received from the exercise of SAR Plan A and SAR Plan B awards during the year ended March 31,
2013 was ¥56 million and the tax benefit realized from exercise of these awards was ¥1,181 million.

NSU and CSU awards
NSUs and CSUs are cash-settled awards linked to the price of the Company’s common stock which have
graded vesting over three to five years from grant date. NSUs replicate the key features of SAR Plan B awards
described above but are settled in cash rather than the Company’s common stock. CSUs are similar to NSUs but
exposure of the employee to movements in the price of the Company’s common stock is subject to a cap andfloor.
The fair value of NSUs and CSUs are determined using the price of the Company’s common stock.
F-105

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table presents activity related to NSUs and CSUs for the year ended March 31, 2013:
NSUs
Outstanding(number of units)

CSUs
Outstanding(number of units)

Stock
price

Stock
price

Outstanding as of March 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

68,410,978
38,795,388(39,569,233)(5,105,557)¥373
33,096,488
308(1) 75,425,312355(2) (32,433,846)(5,351,130)¥373
260(1)
338(2)

Outstanding as of March 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62,531,576¥583(3)¥316(3)70,736,824(1) Weighted-average price of the Company’s common stock used to determine number of awards granted(2) Weighted-average price of the Company’s common stock used to determine the final cash settlement
amount of the awards(3) The price of the Company’s common stock used to remeasure the fair value of the remaining outstanding
unvested awards as of March 31, 2013
Total compensation expense recognized within Non-interest expenses—Compensation and benefits in the
consolidated statements of income relating to NSUs and CSUs for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and2013 was ¥13,708 million, ¥27,257 million and ¥33,286 million, respectively. Total unrecognized compensation
cost relating to NSU, based on the fair value of these awards as of March 31, 2013 was ¥5,171 million which will
be recognized through the consolidated statements of income over a remaining weighted-average period of
2.4 years. Total unrecognized compensation cost relating to CSU, based on the fair value of these awards as ofMarch 31, 2013 was ¥5,662 million which will be recognized through the consolidated statements of income
over a remaining weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
MYPD awards
During the year ended March 2013, Nomura issued MYPD awards, which are new performance-based
incentive awards for senior management and other senior employees. Under the terms of the award, employees
are granted notional performance units which are linked to the profitability of Nomura and specific businesssegments over a cumulative two year performance period. At the end of the performance period, depending on
the extent to which profitability targets are met, the notional performance units are converted into a predetermined amount of SAR Plan B awards or NSUs.
The MYPD awards are classified as equity awards because these are expected to result in the issuance of
SARs. Since these awards contain both performances and service conditions, total compensation cost isrecognized over the requisite service period of the employee who receives the award, to the extent it is deemed
probable that the performance condition will be met.
The following table presents activity relating to MYPD awards for the year ended March 31, 2013:
Outstanding(number of shares)(2)

Stock
price

Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

28,697,850(1,542,900)¥298(1)
298

Outstanding as of March 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27,154,950¥298(1) Weighted-average price of the Company’s common stock used to determine number of awards granted
during the year.
(2) Based on the probable number of SARs which will be issued on conversion of notional performance units at
the end of the performance period.
F-106

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Total compensation expense recognized within Non-interest expenses—Compensation and benefits in the
consolidated statements of income relating to MYPD awards, based on the current estimate of the extent to which
it is probable that the performance conditions within the awards will be met for the year ended March 31, 2013was ¥2,864 million. As of March 31, 2013, total unrecognized compensation cost relating to MYPD awards was¥5,233 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.5 years.
NIU awards
In addition to the stock-based compensation awards described above, Nomura also grants NIUs to certain
senior management and employees. NIUs are cash-settled awards linked to a world stock index quoted by
Morgan Stanley Capital International which have graded vesting over three to five years from the grant date.
The fair value of NIUs is determined using the price of the index.
The following table presents activity relating to NIUs for the year ended March 31, 2013:
Outstanding(number of units)

Index price(1)Outstanding as of March 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

36,871,138
46,783,794(29,201,184)(4,692,807)$3,3202,982(2)3,398(3)Outstanding as of March 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49,760,941$3,674(4)

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

The price of each unit is determined using 1/1000th of the index price.
Weighted-average index price used to determine number of awards granted.
Weighted-average index price used to determine the final cash settlement amount of the awards.
Index price used to remeasure the total fair value of the remaining outstanding unvested awards as ofMarch 31, 2013.

Total compensation expense recognized within Non-interest expenses—Compensation and benefits in the
consolidated statements of income relating to NIUs for the year ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013 were
¥8,819 and ¥8,266 million respectively. Total unrecognized compensation cost, based on the fair value of theseawards as of March 31, 2013 was ¥3,602 million which will be recognized through the consolidated statements
of income over a remaining weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
Subsequent events
On May 15, 2013, the Company adopted a resolution to issue SARs No. 52, No. 53 and No. 54 of common
stock pursuant to the SAR Plan B awards for directors and certain employees of the Company and subsidiaries
and has issued SARs on June 5, 2013. The total number of SARs issued is 212,587 for the acquisition of
21,258,700 shares. The exercise price is a nominal ¥1 per share. The SARs vest and are exercisable
approximately one to three years after the grant date and expire approximately six to eight years after the grantdate.
In May 2013, Nomura also granted the issuance of NSUs, CSUs and NIUs to certain senior management
and employees. These awards have a total grant date fair value of ¥45 billion and a vesting period of up to three
years.
All new deferred awards granted in May 2013 include “Full Career Retirement” provisions which permit therecipients of the awards to continue to vest in the awards upon voluntary termination if certain criteria based on
corporate title and length of service within Nomura are met.
F-107

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
17. Restructuring initiatives:
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, in anticipation of an ongoing environment of economic
uncertainty, Nomura undertook a group-wide restructuring initiative primarily focusing on its Wholesale
Division to improve profitability, select accretive businesses aligned with market conditions and to allocate
business resources to growth regions accordingly.
As a result of this initial restructuring initiative, Nomura has recognized total restructuring costs of¥12,397 million and ¥372 million in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended March 31, 2012
and March 31, 2013, respectively and in total, ¥12,769 million as of March 31, 2013. The restructuring costs
primarily comprise employee termination costs reported within Noninterest expenses—Compensation andbenefits. Liabilities relating these restructuring costs including currency translation adjustments were
¥7,083 million and ¥2,148 million as of March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. For the year ended March 31,
2013, ¥5,710 million had been settled.
This initial restructuring initiative was largely completed during in the year ended March 31, 2013 andtherefore the amount of further restructuring costs to be incurred going forward is not expected to be material.
During the second quarter of the year ended March 31, 2013, Nomura has undertaken a further restructuringinitiative also focusing on the Wholesale Division to further revise business models and increase businessefficiencies.
As a result of this further restructuring initiative, Nomura has recognized ¥15,588 million of restructuringcosts in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended March 31, 2013. The restructuring costs
primarily comprise employee termination costs which are reported within Noninterest expenses—Compensation
and benefits. As of March 31, 2013, ¥5,741 million of this amount had been settled and the remaining¥8,165 million after currency translation adjustments is reported as a liability.
This restructuring program is scheduled to be completed during the year ended March 31, 2014, however
the total costs to be incurred going forward are currently under evaluation.
18. Income taxes:
The components of income tax expense reflected in the consolidated statements of income are as follows.
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Current:
Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

175
5,956

¥13,481
7,650¥ 71,918
6,164

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,13121,131

78,082

Deferred:
Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56,194(995)

34,274
3,498

55,257(1,300)Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55,19937,772

53,957

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥61,330¥58,903¥132,039

F-108¥

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The income tax benefit recognized from net operating losses for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and2013 totaled ¥4,645 million, ¥1,358 million and ¥2,944 million, respectively.
The Company and its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries have adopted the consolidated tax filing system
permitted under Japanese tax law. The consolidated tax filing system only imposes a national tax. Since April 1,
2004, Nomura’s domestic effective statutory tax rate had been approximately 41%. Due to the revisions ofdomestic tax laws during the third quarter ended December 31, 2011, our effective statutory tax rates are 38% for
the fiscal years beginning between April 1, 2012 and March 31, 2015, and 36% thereafter.
Foreign subsidiaries are subject to income taxes of the countries in which they operate. The relationshipbetween income tax expense and pretax accounting income (loss) is affected by a number of items, including
various tax credits, certain expenses not allowable for income tax purposes and different tax rates applicable toforeign subsidiaries.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the effective income tax rate reflected in the consolidated
statements of income to Nomura’s effective statutory tax rate for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and2013.
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Our effective statutory tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impact of:
Changes in deferred tax valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Taxable items to be added on financial profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-deductible expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-taxable revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends from foreign subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Different tax rate applicable to income (loss) of foreign subsidiaries . . . . . .
Effect of changes in domestic tax laws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expiration of loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit recognized on the devaluation of investment in subsidiaries andaffiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41.0%

41.0%

38.0%

1.6
5.3
16.6
(8.4)
0.0
(0.0)
10.8
—
1.3

(22.5)
3.8
23.3(29.7)
0.9
(1.1)
14.1
45.7
2.8

(0.7)
1.5
12.9
(9.3)
0.2
0.2
10.0
0.9
1.3

(1.3)
(1.1)

(8.8)
(0.2)

—
0.5

65.8%

69.3%

55.5%

Net deferred tax assets of ¥201,244 million and ¥145,602 million reported within Other assets—Other in the
consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively, represent tax effects of the total of thetemporary differences and tax loss carryforwards in those tax jurisdictions with net deductible amounts in futureyears. The net deferred tax liabilities of ¥63,493 million and ¥34,082 million reported within Other liabilities in
the consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively, represent the total of the temporary
differences in those tax jurisdictions with net taxable amounts in future years.

F-109

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Details of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows.
Millions of yen
March 312012
2013

Deferred tax assets
Depreciation, amortization and valuation of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in subsidiaries and affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation of financial instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued pension and severance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued expenses and provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 70,406
177,522
197,961
34,291
84,628313,245
20,034¥ 10,043
177,175
146,800
17,999106,436
341,177
5,228

Gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less—Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

898,087(490,986)

804,858(522,220)

Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

407,101

282,638

Deferred tax liabilities
Investments in subsidiaries and affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation of financial instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

78,262
56,732
3,167
117,112
14,077

88,63153,3672,960
21,9504,210

Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

269,350

171,118

Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 137,751¥ 111,520

The valuation allowance mainly relates to deferred tax assets of consolidated subsidiaries with operating
loss carryforwards for tax purposes. Based on the cumulative and continuing losses of these subsidiaries,
management of Nomura believes that it is more likely than not that the related deferred tax assets will not berealized. The allowances against deferred tax assets are determined based on a review of future realizable value.
Changes in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets are shown below.

2011

Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2012

2013

Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥501,554¥461,966(39,588)(1)
29,020(2)¥490,986
31,234(3)Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥461,966¥522,220(1)(2)¥490,986

Includes negative ¥33,523 million related to foreign subsidiaries which is mainly due to an effect ofutilized loss carryforwards in certain U.S. subsidiaries, negative ¥2,657 million and negative¥3,408 million related to Japanese subsidiaries and the Company, respectively, which is due mainly to a
result of a review of future realizable value for the deferred tax assets previously recorded. In total,¥39,588 million of allowances decreased for the year ended March 31, 2011.
Includes ¥24,715 million related to foreign subsidiaries which is mainly due to an increase in
non-recoverability of losses in certain foreign subsidiaries, ¥20,014 million related to Japanese subsidiaries
which is mainly due to the effect of the conversion of Nomura Land and Building Co., Ltd. into a
subsidiary of Nomura Holdings, Inc., and negative ¥15,709 million related to the Company which is due
mainly to the decrease of allowance for the deferred tax assets previously recorded. In total,¥29,020 million of allowances increased for the year ended March 31, 2012.
F-110

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)(3)

Includes ¥52,862 million related to foreign subsidiaries which is mainly due to an increase in
non-recoverability of losses in certain foreign subsidiaries, negative ¥22,903 million related to thede-consolidation of NREH into an equity method affiliate, and ¥1,275 million related to Japanesesubsidiaries and the Company, which is determined based on a review of future realizable value. In total,¥31,234 million of allowances increased for the year ended March 31, 2013.

As of March 31, 2013, no deferred income taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of foreignsubsidiaries totaling ¥2,190 million not expected to be remitted in the foreseeable future. It is not practicable todetermine the amount of income taxes payable in the event all such foreign earnings are repatriated.
As of March 31, 2013, Nomura has net operating loss carryforwards, for income tax purposes, of¥1,339,383 million mainly resulting from certain U.S. and European subsidiaries. These losses, except for¥771,418 million, which can be carried forward indefinitely, expire as follows: 2013 through2022—¥315,415 million, 2023 and thereafter—¥252,550 million. Nomura believes that it is more likely than notthat these loss carryforwards, less valuation allowance, will be realized.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits were not significant as of March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013.
Also there were no significant movements of the gross amounts in unrecognized tax benefits and the amount ofinterest and penalties recognized due to the unrecognized tax benefits during the years ended March 31, 2011,2012 and 2013. Nomura recognizes the accrual of interest related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties
related to unrecognized tax benefits within Income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income.
Nomura is under continuous examination by the Japanese National Tax Agency and other tax authorities inmajor operating jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and U.S. Nomura regularly assesses thelikelihood of additional assessments in each tax jurisdiction and the impact on the consolidated financial
statements. A liability for unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in the amount that is sufficient to coverpotential exposure for an additional tax assessment depending on likelihood. It is reasonably possible that there
may be a significant increase in unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of March 31, 2013. Quantification ofan estimated range cannot be made at this time due to the uncertainty of the potential outcomes. However,Nomura does not expect that any change in the gross balance of unrecognized tax benefits would have a material
effect on its financial condition.
Nomura operates in multiple taxing jurisdictions, and faces audits from various tax authorities regarding
many issues including but not limited to transfer pricing, deductibility of certain expenses, creditability of foreigntaxes, and other matters. The table below summarizes the major jurisdictions in which Nomura operates and theearliest year in which Nomura remains subject to examination. Under Hong Kong Special Administrative Region(“Hong Kong”) tax law, the statute of limitation does not apply if the entity records a tax loss, thus not stated in
below table.
Jurisdiction

Year

Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.K. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2008(1)2012
2009(1) For transfer pricing, the earliest year in which Nomura remains subject to examinations is 2007.

F-111

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Revisions of domestic tax laws—
On December 2, 2011, the “Act to partially revise the Income Tax Act and others in order to construct a tax
system corresponding to changes in the structure of economic system” (Act No. 114 of 2011) (“Act 114”) was
promulgated. Under Act 114, effective from the fiscal year beginning on or after April 1, 2012, corporate income
tax rate has been reduced from 30% to 25.5% and the use of operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes
limited to 80% of the current year taxable income before deducting operating loss carryforwards for tax
purposes. Also, on December 2, 2011, the “Special measures act to secure the financial resources required to
implement policy on restoration after the East Japan Earthquake” (Act No. 117 of 2011) (“Act 117”) was
promulgated. Under Act 117, effective for three fiscal years beginning between April 1, 2012 and March 31,
2015, a Special Reconstruction Corporate Tax has been imposed on companies, which is calculated bymultiplying the base corporate income tax by 10%. As a result, domestic statutory tax rates to calculate deferred
tax assets and liabilities are 38% for the temporary differences expected to be reversed between April 1, 2012
and March 31, 2015 and 36% thereafter.
Due to these revisions, for the year ended March 31, 2012, net deferred tax assets decreased by¥5,510 million as at the revision of domestic tax laws. For the year ended March 31, 2012, income tax expenses
increased by ¥5,510 million and net income attributable to NHI shareholders decreased by ¥13,251 million.
19. Shareholders’ equity:
Changes in shares of common stock outstanding are shown below.

2011

SharesYear ended March 31
2012

2013

Number of shares outstanding at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . .
New issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,669,044,614—

3,600,886,932
103,429,360

3,663,483,895—

Common stock held in treasury:
Repurchases of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock issued to employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other net change in treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(75,030,934)
2,409
6,870,600
243(50,093,031)
1,530
9,271,600(12,496)(19,209)601
47,335,900
159,065

Number of shares outstanding at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,600,886,932

3,663,483,895

3,710,960,252

The amount available for dividends and acquisition of treasury stock is subject to the restrictions under theCompanies Act of Japan. Additional paid-in capital and retained earnings include amounts which the Companies
Act of Japan prohibits for the use of dividends and acquisition of treasury stock. As of March 31, 2011, 2012 and2013, the amounts available for distributions were ¥480,471 million, ¥483,126 million and ¥538,021 million,
respectively. These amounts are based on the amounts recorded in the Company’s unconsolidated financial
statements maintained in accordance with accounting principles and practices prevailing in Japan. U.S. GAAP
adjustments incorporated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements but not recorded in the
Company’s unconsolidated financial statements have no effect on the determination of the amounts available for
distributions under the Companies Act of Japan.
Retained earnings include Nomura’s share of investee undistributed earnings which have been accounted forbased on the equity method, and those Nomura’s share of investee undistributed earnings amounted to¥77,145 million, ¥50,922 million and ¥125,944 million as of March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
F-112

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Change in cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax in other comprehensive income (loss) for the year
ended March 31, 2013 includes reclassification adjustment of ¥9,844 million for loss due to substantiallycomplete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity and the amount of income tax benefit allocated to thisreclassification adjustment is ¥2,985 million.
Dividends on common stock per share were ¥8 for the year ended March 31, 2011, ¥6 for the year ended
March 31, 2012 and ¥8 for the year ended March 31, 2013.
The Company issued new shares of common stock and repurchased common stock in accordance with NLB
becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Nomura for the year ended March 31, 2012. See Note 11 “Businesscombinations” for further information.
The change in common stock held in treasury includes the change in shares issued to employees understock-based compensation plans, shares sold to enable shareholders to hold round lots of the 100 share minimum
tradable quantity (adding-to-holdings requests) or shares acquired to create round lots or eliminate odd lots.
Common stock held in treasury also includes, as of March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, 1,062,910 shares, or¥2,189 million, 908,498 shares, or ¥1,985 million, and 1,257,966 shares, or ¥2,161 million, respectively, held byaffiliated companies.
Subsequent Events
On April 26, 2013, the board of directors approved a resolution to set up a share buyback program, pursuant
to the company’s articles of incorporation set out in accordance with Article 459-1 of the Companies Act ofJapan as follows: (a) total number of shares authorized for repurchase is up to 40,000,000 shares, (b) total valueof shares authorized for repurchase is up to ¥35 billion and (c) the share buyback program will run fromMay 8, 2013, to May 31, 2013. Under this buyback program, the Company repurchased 40,000,000 shares ofcommon stock at a cost of ¥32,470 million.
20. Regulatory requirements:
In April 2011, the Company has been assigned as Final Designated Parent Company who must calculate
consolidated capital adequacy ratio and since then, our consolidated capital adequacy ratio has been calculated
based on Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company. Note that Capital Adequacy Notice on
Final Designated Parent Company has been revised in line with Basel 2.5 and Basel III and we have calculated
Basel III-based consolidated capital adequacy ratio since March 2013.
In accordance with Article 2 of the Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company, ourconsolidated capital adequacy ratio is calculated based on the amounts of common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1
capital, total capital, credit risk-weighted assets, market risk and operational risk. As of March 31, 2013, we werein compliance with the requirement for common equity Tier1 capital ratio, Tier 1 capital ratio and consolidated
capital adequacy ratio set out in the Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent Company (required
level as of March 31, 2013 is 3.5% for common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, 4.5% for Tier 1 capital ratio and 8%
for consolidated capital adequacy ratio). Also, as of March 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with theminimum capital requirement set out in the Basel 2.5-based Capital Adequacy Notice on Final Designated Parent
Company.
Under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (the “FIEA”), NSC and Nomura Financial
Products & Services, Inc. (“NFPS”) are subject to the capital adequacy rules of the FSA. This rule requires themaintenance of a capital adequacy ratio, which is defined as the ratio of adjusted capital to a quantified total of
business risk, of not less than 120%. Adjusted capital is defined as net worth (which includes shareholders’F-113

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
equity, net unrealized gains and losses on securities held, reserves and subordinated debts) less illiquid assets.
The business risks are divided into three categories: (1) market risks, (2) counterparty risks, and (3) basic risks.
Under this rule, there are no restrictions on the operations of the companies provided that the resulting net capital
adequacy ratio exceeds 120%. As of March 31, 2012 and 2013, the capital adequacy ratio of NSC exceeded
120%. As of March 31, 2013, the capital adequacy ratio of NFPS exceeded 120%.
Financial Instruments Firms in Japan are required to segregate cash deposited by clients on securities
transactions under the FIEA. As of March 31, 2012 and 2013, NSC segregated bonds with a market value of¥269,979 million and ¥459,037 million and equities with a market value of ¥6,353 million and ¥7,861 million,
respectively, which were either included in Trading assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets orborrowed under lending and borrowing securities contracts, as a substitute for cash.
In the U.S., Nomura Securities International, Inc. (“NSI”) is registered as a broker-dealer under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and as a futures commission merchant with the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (“CFTC”). NSI is also regulated by self-regulatory organizations, such as the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group as its designated self regulatory organization.
NSI is subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Uniform Net Capital Rule (“Rule 15c3-1”) andother related rules, which require net capital, as defined under the alternative method, of not less than the greaterof $1,000,000 or 2% of aggregate debit items arising from client transactions. The subsidiary is also subject to
CFTC Regulation 1.17 which requires the maintenance of net capital of 8% of the total risk margin requirement,
as defined, for all positions carried in client accounts and nonclient accounts or $1,000,000, whichever is greater.
The subsidiary is required to maintain net capital in accordance with the SEC, CFTC, or other various exchange
requirements, whichever is greater. As of March 31, 2012 and 2013, the subsidiary was in compliance with allapplicable regulatory capital adequacy requirements.
In Europe, Nomura Europe Holdings plc (“NEHS”) is regulated on a consolidated basis by the Prudential
Regulatory Authority in the U.K., which imposes minimum capital adequacy requirements on NEHS. Nomura
International plc (“NIP”), the most significant of NEHS’ subsidiaries, acts as a securities brokerage and dealing
business. NIP is regulated and has minimum capital adequacy requirements imposed on it on a standalone basisby the Prudential Regulation Authority in the U.K. Nomura Bank International plc (“NBI”), another subsidiary of
NEHS, is also regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority in the U.K. on a standalone basis. As of
March 31, 2012 and 2013, the NEHS, NIP and NBI were in compliance with all relevant regulatory capital
related requirements.
In Asia, Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited (“NIHK”) and Nomura Singapore Ltd (“NSL”) areregulated by the respective authorities. NIHK is licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission in
Hong Kong to carry out regulated activities including dealing in securities and futures contracts, and advising on
securities, futures contracts and corporate finance. NIHK assumed from its fellow subsidiary, Nomura Securities(Hong Kong) Ltd, the roles of the exchange participant at the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Ltd., the futurescommission merchant at the Hong Kong Futures Exchange Ltd. and the clearing participants at the Hong Kong
Securities Clearing Co. Ltd., the SEHK Options Clearing House Ltd. and HKFE Clearing Corporation Ltd witheffect from April 22, 2013. NIHK has a branch located in Taiwan which is regulated by its local regulators under
its respective jurisdictions. Activities of NIHK including its branch are subject to the Securities and Futures(Financial Resources) Rules which require it, at all times, to maintain its liquid capital at a level not less than its
required liquid capital. Liquid capital means an amount by which its liquid assets exceed its ranking liabilities.
Required liquid capital is calculated in accordance with the provisions laid down in the Securities and Futures(Financial Resources) Rules. NSL is a merchant bank with Asian Currency Unit (“ACU”) license governed by
F-114

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”). NSL carries out its ACU regulated activities including, among
others, securities brokerage and dealing business. The regulations require NSL to maintain a minimum capital of
SGD15 million. Currently, NSL is observing relevant financial ratios which fulfill the requirement from MAS.
As of March 31, 2012 and 2013, NIHK and NSL were in compliance with all relevant regulatory capital related
requirements.
21. Affiliated companies and other equity-method investees:
Nomura’s significant affiliated companies and other equity-method investees include JAFCO Co., Ltd.
(“JAFCO”), NRI, NREH, and Fortress Investment Group LLC (“Fortress”).
During the year ended March 31, 2012, NLB was consolidated and Chi-X Europe Limited (“Chi-X
Europe”) was disposed of. Both of these companies have historically been reported as significant affiliatedcompanies of Nomura.
JAFCO
JAFCO, which is a listed company in Japan, manages various venture capital funds and provides private
equity-related investment services to portfolio companies.
In May 2011, the Company purchased 382,000 shares of NLB for ¥18,145 million from JAFCO when
Nomura purchased additional issued shares of NLB and made it a subsidiary. See Note 11 “Businesscombinations” for further information. In addition, Nomura indirectly acquired an additional 0.3% equity interest
in JAFCO at the same time.
As of March 31, 2013, Nomura’s ownership of JAFCO was 24.4% and there was no remaining equity
method goodwill included in the carrying amount of the investment.
NRI
NRI develops and manages computer systems and provides research services and management consulting
services. One of the major clients of NRI is Nomura.
In May 2011, Nomura indirectly acquired an additional 0.9% equity interest in NRI, when Nomura
purchased additional issued shares of NLB and made it a subsidiary.
In July 2011, the Company acquired 381,520 shares of NLB from NRI and issued 45,019,360 commonshares to NRI as a result of the share exchange. See Note 11 “Business combinations” for further information.
As of March 31, 2013, Nomura’s ownership of NRI was 38.8% and the remaining balance of equity method
goodwill included in the carrying value of the investment was ¥56,473 million.
NLB
NLB owns certain of Nomura’s leased office space in Japan. NLB became a consolidated subsidiary of
Nomura on May 24, 2011 and is therefore no longer an affiliated company of Nomura. See Note 11 “Businesscombinations” for further information. In addition, lease transactions with Nomura while NLB was an affiliatedcompany of Nomura are disclosed in Note 10 “Leases”.
F-115

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Fortress
Fortress is a global investment management firm. Fortress raises, invests and manages private equity funds,
hedge funds and publicly traded alternative investment vehicles. The investment in Fortress is treated as aninvestment in a limited partnership and is accounted for by the equity method of accounting.
As of March 31, 2013, Nomura’s ownership of Fortress was 12.5% and there was no remaining equity
method goodwill included in the carrying value of the investment.
Chi-X Europe
The investment in Chi-X Europe was accounted for by the equity method from December 31, 2009.
On February 18, 2011, BATS Global Markets, Inc. (“BATS”) entered into a definitive agreement to acquire
100% of the outstanding stock of Chi-X Europe. After regulatory approval, Nomura exchanged its shares in ChiX Europe for approximately 7% (fully diluted) of the outstanding stock of BATS. As a result, Chi-X Europe istherefore no longer an affiliated company of Nomura.
NREH
NREH was a consolidated subsidiary of Nomura until March, 2013. In March 2013, Nomura sold 32,040
thousand shares of NREH. As a result, Nomura’s voting interest fell to 34.0%. Since Nomura no longer
maintains a controlling financial interest in NREH, NREH has been deconsolidated and is now an affiliatedcompany accounted for by the equity method from March 2013.
As part of deconsolidation process, a gain of ¥50,139 million, including unrealized gain of ¥38,468 million
from Nomura’s remaining shares, was recognized which is reported in the consolidated statements of income
within Revenue—Other.
NREH is a listed company in the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange and the fair value of theretained investment in NREH was estimated using quoted market price.
As of March 31, 2013, Nomura’s ownership of NREH was 34.0% and the remaining balance of equity
method goodwill included in the carrying value of the investment was ¥11,012 million.
Summary financial information—
A summary of financial information for JAFCO, NRI, NLB and NREH is as follows.
Millions of yen
March 312012(1)
2013(1)(3)

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥564,086 ¥2,307,795
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
200,020
1,551,699

F-116

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012(2)
2013(3)

Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥590,985 ¥161,209 ¥143,193
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
535,564
105,520
69,899Net income attributable to the companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29,39231,007
48,706(1) NLB’s assets and liabilities are not included because it was not an affiliated company of Nomura as ofMarch 31, 2012 and 2013.
(2) For NLB, financial information while it was an affiliated company of Nomura is included.
(3) NREH is accounted for by the equity method from March 2013. NREH’s assets and liabilities are included
however Net revenues, Non-interest expenses and Net income attributable to NREH are not included.
A summary of financial information for Fortress is as follows.
Millions of yen
March 312012(1)
2013(1)

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥184,650
96,312¥203,332
88,881Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011(1)
2012(1)
2013(1)

Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 89,710 ¥ 73,306 ¥95,356
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
154,161
166,006
73,956
Net income (loss) attributable to the company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(24,400) (36,994)
6,487(1) Financial information for Fortress is as of its fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012,
respectively. Nomura recognizes its share of Fortress’s earnings on a three-month lag.
A summary of balances and transactions with affiliated companies and other equity-method investees,
except for lease transactions with NLB and NRI, which are disclosed in Note 10 “Leases”, is presented below.
Millions of yen
March 3120122013

Investments in affiliated companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advances to affiliated companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other receivables from affiliated companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other payables to affiliated companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥183,305
10,6495,160
5,643¥333,329
12,376
8,856
4,270

Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 3,056 ¥ 5,635 ¥ 7,418
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
52,79649,81048,755Purchase of software, securities and tangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20,94522,90455,099F-117

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The aggregate carrying amount and fair value of investments in affiliated companies and other equitymethod investees for which a quoted market price is available are as follows.
Millions of yen
March 31
2012
2013

Carrying amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥172,647
208,827¥322,747
404,967

Equity in earnings of equity-method investees, including those above, was a gain of ¥11,602 million, gain of¥5,716 million and gain of ¥18,597 million for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Equity in earnings of equity-method investees is reported within Revenue—Other in the consolidated statements
of income. Dividends from equity-method investees for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were
¥4,802 million, ¥4,747 million and ¥5,594 million, respectively.
22. Commitments, contingencies and guarantees:
Commitments—
Credit and investment commitments
In connection with its banking and financing activities, Nomura provides commitments to extend credit
which generally have fixed expiration dates. In connection with its investment banking activities, Nomura enters
into agreements with clients under which Nomura commits to underwrite notes that may be issued by the clients.
The outstanding commitments under these agreements are included below in commitments to extend credit.
Nomura has commitments to invest in various partnerships and other entities, primarily in connection withits merchant banking activities, and also has commitments to provide financing for investments related to thesepartnerships. The outstanding commitments under these agreements are included in commitments to invest in
partnerships.
Certain consolidated VIEs which are engaged in the aircraft leasing business have commitments to purchaseaircraft. The outstanding commitments under these agreements are included in commitments to purchase aircraft.
The following table presents a summary of the key types of outstanding commitments provided by Nomura
as of March 31, 2012 and 2013.
Millions of yen
March 312012
2013

Commitments to extend credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments to invest in partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments to purchase aircraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-118¥332,009
28,82552,411¥369,988
29,97430,143

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
As of March 31, 2013, these commitments had the following maturities:

Commitments to extend credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments to invest in partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments to purchase aircraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Totalcontractual
amountMillions of yen
Years to maturity
Less than
1 to 33 to 5
1 yearyears
years

More than
5 years¥369,988
29,97430,143¥55,459375
21,141¥113,580
10,394—¥74,810
17,702
9,002¥126,139
1,503—

The contractual amounts of these commitments to extend credit represent the amounts at risk should thecontracts be fully drawn upon, should the counterparties default, and assuming the value of any existing
collateral becomes worthless. The total contractual amount of these commitments may not represent future cash
requirements since the commitments may expire without being drawn upon. The credit risk associated with thesecommitments varies depending on the clients’ creditworthiness and the value of collateral held. Nomura
evaluates each client’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemednecessary by Nomura upon extension of credit, is based on credit evaluation of the counterparty.
Other commitments
The amounts of commitments to purchase real estate for sale and rental were ¥234,400 million as ofMarch 31, 2012 and ¥nil as of March 31, 2013. Purchase obligations for goods or services that include payments
for construction-related, advertising, and computer and telecommunications maintenance agreements amounted
to ¥37,237 million as of March 31, 2012 and ¥26,228 million as of March 31, 2013.
Nomura has commitments under resale and repurchase agreements including amounts in connection withcollateralized agreements, collateralized financing and Gensaki Repo transactions. These commitments amounted
to ¥2,519 billion for resale agreements and ¥1,711 billion for repurchase agreements as of March 31, 2012 and¥4,103 billion for resale agreements and ¥1,152 billion for repurchase agreements as of March 31, 2013. Theseamounts include certain types of repurchase transactions and securities transactions which Nomura accounts foras sales rather than collateralized financings in accordance with ASC 860.
In Japan, there is a market in which participants lend and borrow debt and equity securities without
collateral to and from financial institutions. Under these arrangements, Nomura had obligations to return debt
and equity securities borrowed without collateral of ¥269 billion and ¥340 billion as of March 31, 2012 and2013, respectively.
As a member of securities clearing houses and exchanges, Nomura may be required to pay a certain share of
the financial obligations of another member who may default on its obligations to the clearing house or theexchange. These guarantees are generally required under the membership agreements. To mitigate these risks,exchanges and clearing houses often require members to post collateral. The potential for Nomura to makepayments under such guarantees is deemed remote.
Contingencies
Investigations, lawsuits and other legal proceedings
In the normal course of business as a global financial services entity, Nomura is involved in investigations,lawsuits and other legal proceedings and, as a result, may suffer loss from any fine, penalties or damages
awarded against Nomura, any settlements Nomura chooses to make to resolve a matter, and legal and otheradvisory costs incurred to support and formulate a defense.
F-119

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The ability to predict the outcome of these actions and proceedings is inherently difficult, particularly whereclaimants are seeking substantial or indeterminate damages, where investigations and legal proceedings are at an
early stage, where the matters present novel legal theories or involve a large number of parties, or which takeplace in foreign jurisdictions with complex or unclear laws.
The Company regularly evaluates each legal proceeding and claim on a case-by-case basis in consultation
with external legal counsel to assess whether an estimate of possible loss or range of loss can be made, if
recognition of a liability is not appropriate. In accordance with ASC 450 “Contingencies” (“ASC 450”), theCompany recognizes a liability for this risk of loss arising on each individual matter when a loss is probable andthe amount of such loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. The amount recognized as a liability isreviewed at least quarterly and is revised when further information becomes available. If these criteria are not
met for an individual matter, such as if an estimated loss is only reasonably possible rather than probable, noliability is recognized. However, where a material loss is reasonably possible, the Company will disclose detailsof the legal proceeding or claim below. Under ASC 450 an event is defined as reasonably possible if the chanceof the loss to the Company is more than remote but less than probable.
The most significant actions and proceedings against Nomura are summarized below. The Company
believes that, based on current information available as of the date of these consolidated financial statements, theultimate resolution of these actions and proceedings will not be material to the Company’s financial condition.
However, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated
statements of income or cash flows in a particular quarter or annual period.
For those significant actions and proceedings described below where the counterparty has alleged a specificamount of damages, the Company currently estimates that the reasonably possible loss for the matter would notexceed the amount specified in each case. For each of these matters, the specific amount alleged (which is theCompany’s current estimate of the maximum reasonably possible loss) is indicated in the description of thematter below. For certain other significant actions and proceedings, the Company is unable to provide anestimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of reasonably possible losses because, among other reasons, (i)the proceedings are at such an early stage there is not enough information available to assess whether the statedgrounds for the claim are viable; (ii) damages have not been identified by the claimant; (iii) damages areunsupported and/or exaggerated; (iv) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals or motions; (v)there are significant legal issues to be resolved that may be dispositive, such as the applicability of statutes oflimitations; and/or (vi) there are novel or unsettled legal theories underlying the claims.
In January 2008, Nomura International plc (“NIP”) was served with a tax notice issued by the tax authorities
in Pescara, Italy alleging breaches by NIP of the U.K.-Italy Double Taxation Treaty of 1998 (the “Tax Notice”).
The alleged breaches relate to payments to NIP of tax credits on dividends on Italian shares. The Tax Notice not
only denies certain payments to which NIP claims to be entitled but also seeks reimbursement of approximately
EUR 33.8 million, plus interest, already refunded. NIP continues vigorously to challenge the Pescara Tax Court’s
decisions in favor of the local tax authorities. The specified amount alleged is the Company’s current estimate of
the maximum reasonably possible loss from this matter.
In April 2010, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (collectively,“Lehman Inc.”) commenced proceedings in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York objecting to the proof ofclaims filed by the Company’s subsidiary, Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. (“NSC”) in respect of swaps and otherderivative transactions in the total amount of approximately $37 million, and affirmatively sought recovery ofdamages. On August 21, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing with prejudice the proceedings andresolving the claim.
F-120

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
In October 2010 and June 2012, two actions were brought against NIP, seeking recovery of payments
allegedly made to NIP by Fairfield Sentry Ltd. and Fairfield Sigma Ltd. (collectively, the “Fairfield Funds”),
which are now in liquidation and were feeder funds to Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (under theliquidation with its trustee’s on-going recovery procedure pursuant to the Securities Investor Protection Act in
the U.S. since December 2008). The first suit was brought by the liquidators of the Fairfield Funds. It was filedon October 5, 2010 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, but was subsequently removed to the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court, where it is presently pending. The second suit was brought by the Madoff Trustee. NIP wasadded as a defendant in June 2012 when the Madoff Trustee filed an amended complaint in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court. Both actions seek to recover approximately $35 million. The $35 million amount is Nomura’s current
estimate of the maximum reasonably possible loss from this matter.
In March 2011, PT Bank Mutiara Tbk. (“Bank Mutiara”) commenced proceedings in the Commercial Courtof the Canton of Zurich against a SPC established at the request of NIP (the main operating subsidiary of Nomura
in the U.K.). The SPC is included as part of NIP’s consolidated accounts. These are proceedings to challenge the
SPC’s rights over approximately $156 million in an account held in Switzerland. The SPC has a security interest
over the money pursuant to a loan facility with Telltop Holdings Limited, a third party company. Telltop
Holdings Limited is currently in liquidation. The SPC does not believe that Bank Mutiara has any enforceable
security interest over the funds and is seeking release of the monies.
In April 2011, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLB-Boston”) commenced proceedings in the
Superior Court of Massachusetts against numerous issuers, sponsors and underwriters of residential mortgagebacked securities (“MBS”), and their controlling persons, including Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation(“NAAC”), Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc. (“NCCI”), Nomura Securities International, Inc. (“NSI”) and Nomura
Holding America Inc. (“NHA”). The action alleges that FHLB-Boston purchased residential MBS issued by
NAAC for which the offering materials contained untrue statements or omitted material facts concerning theunderwriting standards used by the original lenders and the characteristics of the loans underlying the securities.
FHLB-Boston seeks rescission of its purchases or compensatory damages pursuant to state law. FHLB-Boston
alleges that it purchased certificates in four offerings issued by NAAC but does not specify the amount of its
purchases or the amount of any alleged losses. Due to the lack of information at this early stage of the litigationand the uncertainties involved, including lack of information concerning the alleged purchases by the plaintiff,
the Company cannot provide an estimate of reasonably possible loss related to this matter at this time.
In July 2011, the National Credit Union Administration Board (“NCUA”) commenced proceedings in the
United States District Court for the Central District of California as liquidating agent of Western Corporate
Federal Credit Union (“WesCorp”) against various issuers, sponsors and underwriters of residential MBS
purchased by WesCorp. The complaint alleges that WesCorp purchased residential MBS issued by NAAC and
Nomura Home Equity Loan Inc. (“NHEL”), among others, for which the offering materials contained untrue
statements or omitted material facts concerning the underwriting standards used by the original lenders. The
complaint alleges that WesCorp purchased certificates in two offerings in the original principal amount ofapproximately $83 million and seeks rescission of its purchases or compensatory damages. The court has issued
tentative rulings dismissing NCUA’s claims, but no order has yet been entered. Due to the legal uncertainties
involved, as well as the lack of any discovery concerning the facts, the Company cannot provide an estimate ofreasonably possible loss related to this matter at this time.
In September 2011, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), as conservator for the government
sponsored enterprises, Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation(the “GSEs”), commenced proceedings in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkagainst numerous issuers, sponsors and underwriters of residential MBS, and their controlling persons, including
NAAC, NHEL, NCCI, NSI and NHA, (the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries). The action alleges that the GSEs
F-121

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
purchased residential MBS issued by NAAC and NHEL for which the offering materials contained untrue
statements or omitted material facts concerning the underwriting standards used by the original lenders and thecharacteristics of the loans underlying the securities. FHFA alleges that the GSEs purchased certificates in sevenofferings in the original principal amount of approximately $2,046 million and seeks rescission of its purchases
or compensatory damages. The court has denied the motion to dismiss filed by the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries
and the parties are involved in the discovery process. Given the lack of any expert discovery at this stage of thelitigation and certain legal uncertainties, the Company cannot provide an estimate of reasonably possible loss
related to this matter at this time.
In October 2011, the NCUA commenced proceedings in the United States District Court for the District of
Kansas as liquidating agent of U.S. Central Federal Credit Union (“U.S. Central”) against various issuers,
sponsors and underwriters of residential MBS purchased by U.S. Central, including NHEL. The complaint
alleges that U.S. Central purchased residential MBS issued by NHEL, among others, for which the offering
materials contained untrue statements or omitted material facts concerning the underwriting standards used by
the original lenders. The complaint alleges that U.S. Central purchased a certificate in one offering in the original
principal amount of approximately $50 million and seeks rescission of its purchase or compensatory damages.
The court denied, in part, motions to dismiss filed by the defendants, but has certified for interlocutory appeal anissue that would substantially resolve the action in the defendants’ favor. Due to the lack of factual information at
this early stage of the litigation and the legal uncertainties involved, the Company cannot provide an estimate ofreasonably possible loss related to this matter at this time.
In November 2011, NIP was served with a claim filed by the trustee (the “Madoff Trustee”) appointed forthe liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) in the United States Bankruptcy
Court Southern District of New York. This is a clawback action similar to claims filed by the Madoff Trustee
against numerous other institutions. The Madoff Trustee alleges that NIP received redemptions from BLMIS
feeder fund, Harley International (Cayman) Limited in the six years prior to December 11, 2008 (the dateproceedings were commenced against BLMIS) and that these are avoidable and recoverable under the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code and New York law. The amount that the Madoff Trustee is currently seeking to recover from
NIP is approximately $21 million. The specified amount alleged is the Company’s current estimate of the
maximum reasonably possible loss from this matter.
In August 2012, The Prudential Insurance Company of America and certain of its affiliates filed several
complaints in the Superior Court of New Jersey against various issuers, sponsors and underwriters of residential
MBS, including an action against NHEL, NCCI and NSI. The action against these Nomura subsidiaries has been
removed to federal court. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs purchased over $183 million in residential
mortgage-backed securities from five different offerings. The plaintiffs allege that the offering materials
contained material misrepresentations that were fraudulent regarding the underwriting practices and quality of
the loans underlying the securities. The plaintiffs allege causes of action for fraud, aiding and abetting fraud,
negligent misrepresentation, and New Jersey Civil RICO, and seek to recover, among other things, compensatory
and treble damages. Due to the lack of factual information at this early stage of the litigation and the legal
uncertainties involved, the Company cannot provide an estimate of reasonably possible loss related to this matterat this time.
In March 2013, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA (“MPS”) issued a claim in the Italian Courts against
two former directors of MPS and NIP. MPS alleges that the former directors improperly caused MPS to enter
into certain structured financial transactions with NIP in 2009 (the “Transactions”) and alleges that NIP is jointly
liable for the unlawful conduct of MPS’s former directors. MPS is claiming damages of not less than EUR700
million. An investigation has also been commenced by the Public Prosecutor’s office in Siena, Italy into various
F-122

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
allegations against MPS and certain of its former directors, including in relation to the Transactions. Starting on
April 15, 2013, the Public Prosecutor in Siena issued seizure orders in relation to the Transactions seeking toseize the Transactions and approximately EUR 1.9 billion of assets said to be held or receivable in various NIP
and Nomura Bank International plc (“NBI”) accounts in, or managed through, Italy and alleging that theTransactions involved offenses under Italian law. NBI was informed on April 23, 2013 that a seizure order had
been effected over a small amount of cash and certain receivables in Italy. On April 26, 2013, the relevant Italiancriminal judge issued an order declining to validate the various seizure orders issued by the Public Prosecutor.
Accordingly, on the same date, the Public Prosecutor ordered the immediate restitution of all assets subject toseizure. The Public Prosecutor has subsequently lodged an appeal against the order of the relevant Italiancriminal judge that declined to validate the seizure orders. It is not possible for the Company to determine
whether any loss is probable or to estimate the amount of any loss in this proceeding. Numerous legal and factualissues may need to be resolved, including through potentially lengthy discovery and determination of important
factual matters, and by addressing novel or unsettled legal questions relevant to the proceedings in question,
before the amount of any potential liability can be reasonably estimated for this claim. The Company cannot
predict if, how, or when the claim will be resolved or what any eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief
may be, particularly since the claim is at an early stage in its development and the claimant is seeking substantial
damages.
NSC is the leading securities firm in Japan with approximately five million client accounts. Accordingly,
with a significant number of client transactions, NSC is from time to time party to various Japanese civil
litigation and other dispute resolution proceedings with clients relating to investment losses. These include anaction commenced against NSC in April 2012 by a corporate client seeking ¥5,102 million in damages for losseson the pre-maturity cash out of 16 series of currency-linked structured notes purchased from NSC between 2003
and 2008. The plaintiff alleges among other things, insufficient explanation in the sale of the structured notes by
NSC. NSC believes these allegations are without merit. The specified amount alleged is the Company’s current
estimate of the maximum reasonably possible loss from this matter.
Subsequent EventsIn April 2013, another action in relation to investment losses was commenced against NSC by a corporateclient seeking ¥10,247 million in damages for losses on currency derivative transactions and the pre-maturity
cash out or redemption of 11 series of equity-linked structured notes purchased from NSC between 2005 and2011. The plaintiff alleges among other things, insufficient explanation before entering into the transaction or in
the sale of the structured notes by NSC. NSC believes these allegations are without merit. The specified amountalleged is the Company’s current estimate of the maximum reasonably possible loss from this matter.
The Company supports the position of its subsidiaries in each of these claims.
Other mortgage-related contingencies in the U.S.
Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries in the U.S. securitized mortgage loans in the form of MBS. Thesesubsidiaries did not generally originate mortgage loans, but purchased mortgage loans from third-party loan
originators (the “originators”). In connection with such purchases, these subsidiaries received loan level
representations from the originators. In connection with the securitizations, the relevant subsidiaries provided
loan level representations and warranties of the type generally described below, which mirror the representations
the subsidiaries received from the originators.
The loan level representations made in connection with the securitization of mortgage loans were generally
detailed representations applicable to each loan and addressed characteristics of the borrowers and properties.
F-123

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The representations included, but were not limited to, information concerning the borrower’s credit status, theloan-to-value ratio, the owner occupancy status of the property, the lien position, the fact that the loan was
originated in accordance with the originator’s guidelines, and the fact that the loan was originated in compliancewith applicable laws. Certain of the MBS issued by the subsidiaries were structured with credit protection
provided to specified classes of certificates by monoline insurers.
The relevant subsidiaries have received claims demanding the repurchase of certain loans from trustees ofvarious securitization trusts, made at the instance of one or more investors, or from certificate insurers. It is ourpolicy to review each claim that has been received, and the subsidiaries have contested those claims believed to
be without merit or have agreed to repurchase certain loans for those claims that the subsidiaries have determined
to have merit. In several instances, following the rejection of repurchase demands, investors have instituted
actions through the trustee alleging breach of contract. These breach of contract claims, which seek to enforce therepurchase demands made, are at a very early stage.
The Company cannot provide an estimate of reasonably possible loss relating to the existing unresolved
demands or the likelihood of additional breach of representation claims at this time due to the uncertainties
involved. Specifically, macroeconomic conditions, including the unemployment rate, affect the rate of defaults inresidential mortgages. Further, the Company’s exposure with respect to such claims is influenced by theparticular originators which underwrote the loans at issue, the particular representations made (which were notuniform across all securitizations), and fluctuations in values in the residential real estate markets which affectthe loss severity for defaulting loans. As at June 13, 2013, the subsidiaries have received claims to repurchaseloans with original principal of $4,663 million that are unresolved. Further, due to the lack of factual information
at this early stage and the legal uncertainties involved, the Company cannot provide an estimate of reasonably
possible loss related to breach of contract claims arising from rejected repurchase demands.
Guarantees—
ASC 460 “Guarantees” specifies the disclosures to be made in regards to obligations under certain issued
guarantees and requires a liability to be recognized for the fair value of a guarantee obligation at inception.
In the normal course of business, Nomura enters into various guarantee arrangements with counterparties in
the form of standby letters of credit and other guarantees, which generally have a fixed expiration date.
In addition, Nomura enters into certain derivative contracts that meet the accounting definition of aguarantee, namely derivative contracts that contingently require a guarantor to make payment to a guaranteed
party based on changes in an underlying that relate to an asset, liability or equity security held by a guaranteed
party. Since Nomura does not track whether its clients enter into these derivative contracts for speculative or
hedging purposes, Nomura has disclosed below information about derivative contracts that could meet theaccounting definition of guarantees.
For information about the maximum potential amount of future payments that Nomura could be required tomake under certain derivatives, the notional amount of contracts has been disclosed. However, the maximum
potential payout for certain derivative contracts, such as written interest rate caps and written currency options,cannot be estimated, as increases in interest or foreign exchange rates in the future could be theoreticallyunlimited.
Nomura records all derivative contracts at fair value on its consolidated balance sheets. Nomura believes thenotional amounts generally overstate its risk exposure. Since the derivative contracts are accounted for at fairvalue, carrying value is considered the best indication of payment and performance risk for individual contracts.
F-124

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table presents information on Nomura’s derivative contracts that could meet the accounting
definition of a guarantee and standby letters of credit and other guarantees.
Millions of yen
March 312012

Derivative contracts(1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Standby letters of credit and other guarantees(3) . . . . .

2013

Carryingvalue

Maximum
potential
payout /Notional
total

Carryingvalue

Maximum
potential
payout /Notional
total¥3,997,315
264¥107,572,427
21,674¥4,510,650
277¥123,980,481
9,084(1) Credit derivatives are disclosed in Note 3 “Derivative instruments and hedging activities” and are excluded
from derivative contracts.
(2) Derivative contracts primarily consist of equity, interest rate and foreign exchange contracts.
(3) Collateral held in connection with standby letters of credit and other guarantees as of March 31, 2012 was¥6,377 million and as of March 31, 2013 is ¥6,374 million.
The following table presents maturity information on Nomura’s derivative contracts that could meet theaccounting definition of a guarantee and standby letters of credit and other guarantees as of March 31, 2013.

Derivative contracts . . .
Standby letters ofcredit and otherguarantees . . . . . . . .

Millions of yen
Maximum potential payout/NotionalYears to Maturity
Less than
1 year1 to 3 years
3 to 5 years

Carrying
value

Total

More than
5 years¥4,510,650¥123,980,481¥39,561,164¥31,284,453¥13,333,026¥39,801,838

277

9,084

8

319

668

8,089

23. Segment and geographic information:
Operating segments—
Nomura’s operating management and management reporting are prepared based on the Retail, the AssetManagement, and the Wholesale segments. Nomura structures its business segments based upon the nature of its
main products and services, its client base and its management structure.
The accounting policies for segment information materially follow U.S. GAAP, except for the impact of
unrealized gains/losses on investments in equity securities held for operating purposes, which under U.S. GAAP
are included in Income before income taxes, but excluded from segment information.
Revenues and expenses directly associated with each business segment are included in the operating resultsof each respective segment. Revenues and expenses that are not directly attributable to a particular segment areallocated to each respective business segment or included in “Other”, based upon Nomura’s allocation
methodologies as used by management to assess each segment’s performance.

F-125

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Business segments’ results are shown in the following tables. Net interest revenue is disclosed because
management views interest revenue net of interest expense for its operating decisions. Business segments’
information on total assets is not disclosed because management does not utilize such information for its
operating decisions and therefore, it is not reported to management. In April 2011, Nomura Bank (Luxembourg)
S.A. in the Asset Management segment was integrated into “Other”. And, in accordance with the realignment inApril 2012, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to confirm with the current fiscal year
presentation (Wholesale and “Other”).
Millions of yen
RetailAsset
Management

Wholesale

Other(Incl. elimination)

Total

Year ended March 31, 2011
Non-interest revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥389,404
3,029¥62,670
3,865¥532,527
93,607¥ 71,684(9,192)¥1,056,285
91,309Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

392,433
291,245

66,53546,513626,134
622,000

62,492
77,685

1,147,594
1,037,443

Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . .

¥101,188¥20,022¥4,134¥ (15,193)¥ 110,151

Year ended March 31, 2012
Non-interest revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥347,385
2,873¥63,0222,778¥428,738
126,311¥ 572,918(11,973)¥1,412,063
119,989

Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

350,258
287,128

65,80045,281

555,049
592,701

560,945525,792

1,532,052
1,450,902

Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . .

¥ 63,130¥20,519¥ (37,652)¥ 35,153¥

Year ended March 31, 2013
Non-interest revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥394,294
3,631¥66,4892,448¥491,773
153,083¥ 695,695(31,467)¥1,648,251
127,695

Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

397,925
297,297

68,93747,768644,856
573,199

664,228
657,637

1,775,946
1,575,901

Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . .

¥100,628¥21,169¥ 71,657

6,591¥ 200,045¥

81,150Transactions between operating segments are recorded within segment results on commercial terms andconditions and are eliminated in “Other” column.

F-126

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table presents the major components of income (loss) before income taxes in “Other.”
Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2011
2012
2013

Net gain related to economic hedging transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 2,290 ¥ 8,372 ¥989
Realized gain on investments in equity securities held for operating
purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
219
198
1,001
Equity in earnings of affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,996
10,613
14,401
Corporate items(1)(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(34,476) (32,129)
17,652Other(2)(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,778
48,099(27,452)
Total(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥(15,193) ¥ 35,153¥ 6,591(1) Includes the gain due to the business combination with NLB in Corporate items during the year ended
March 31, 2012.
(2) Includes the impact of Nomura’s own creditworthiness.
(3) In accordance with the realignment in April 2012, certain prior period amounts of Wholesale and “Other”
have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The table below presents a reconciliation of the combined business segments’ results included in thepreceding table to Nomura’s reported Net revenue, Non-interest expenses and Income before income taxes in the
consolidated statements of income.

2011

Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2012

2013

Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments in equity securities held for
operating purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,147,594¥1,532,052¥1,775,946(16,896)

3,807

37,685

Consolidated net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,130,698¥1,535,859¥1,813,631

Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments in equity securities held for
operating purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,037,443¥1,450,902¥1,575,901

—

—

—

Consolidated non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,037,443¥1,450,902¥1,575,901

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments in equity securities held for
operating purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 110,151¥

81,150¥ 200,045

3,807

37,685

Consolidated income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥84,957¥ 237,730(16,896)
93,255¥

Geographic information—
Nomura’s identifiable assets, revenues and expenses are generally allocated based on the country of
domicile of the legal entity providing the service. However, because of the integration of the global capital
markets and the corresponding global nature of Nomura’s activities and services, it is not always possible to
make a precise separation by location. As a result, various assumptions, which are consistent among years, havebeen made in presenting the following geographic data.
F-127

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The tables below present a geographic allocation of net revenue and income (loss) before income taxes fromoperations by geographic areas, and long-lived assets associated with Nomura’s operations. Net revenue in“Americas” and “Europe” substantially represents Nomura’s operations in the U.S. and the U.K., respectively.
Net revenue and long-lived assets have been allocated based on transactions with external customers while
income (loss) before income taxes has been allocated based on the inclusion of intersegment transactions.

2011

Millions of yen
Year ended March 31
2012

2013

Net revenue(1):Americas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asia and Oceania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 168,889
257,135
44,474¥ 143,350
195,826
34,819¥ 208,962
172,761
43,265

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

470,498
660,200

373,995
1,161,864

424,988
1,388,643

Consolidated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,130,698¥1,535,859¥1,813,631

Income (loss) before income taxes:
Americas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥4,410 ¥ (24,612) ¥ 25,730
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(43,627)(91,544)(93,099)
Asia and Oceania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(16,296)(12,937)(12,063)
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(55,513)
148,768¥

93,255¥¥91,295
115,352
31,642(79,432)
317,162

84,957¥ 237,730

March 31
2012

2011

Long-lived assets:
Americas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asia and Oceania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(129,093)
214,050¥

2013

94,698114,195
23,892¥ 118,302
111,381
20,471

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

238,289
270,945

232,785
973,711250,154
294,002

Consolidated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 509,234¥1,206,496¥ 544,156(1) There is no revenue derived from transactions with a single major external customer.
24. Supplementary subsidiary guarantee information required under SEC rules:
The Company provides several guarantees of borrowings of its subsidiaries. The Company has fully andunconditionally guaranteed the securities issued or to be issued by Nomura America Finance LLC, which is anindirect, wholly owned finance subsidiary of the Company.

F-128

Consolidated Financial Statements
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
At 31st March, 2012 and 2013 (unaudited) andfor the years ended 31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012,
and 2013 (unaudited) with Report of Independent Auditors

Unless otherwise noted, the amounts included in the financial statements are expressed in millions of yen
with fractional amounts rounded off.

A-1

Report of Independent Auditors
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. (the“Company”) as of March 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
income, changes in net assets, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are theresponsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Thosestandards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. at March 31, 2012 and the consolidated results of theiroperations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in Japan.
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. as of March 31, 2013, and theconsolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in net assets and cash flows for the years
ended March 31, 2011 and 2013 were not audited by us in accordance with auditing standards generally acceptedin the United States and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion on them in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC
June 27, 2012

A-2

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013
(unaudited)

AssetsCurrent assets:
Cash and bank deposits (Notes 2 and 10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 8,462 ¥ 10,274
Short-term investment securities (Notes 2, 3 and 10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
81,07990,186
Accounts receivable and other receivables (Notes 2 and 4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
76,192
76,530Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
178
223
Deferred income taxes (Note 8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,066
7,291
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,906
4,803
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(79)
(74)
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment (Note 5):
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leased assets, net (Note 12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

176,804

189,233

13,60033,167
12,899114
7,789

12,14140,502
10,74370—

Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67,56963,456

Software and other intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities (Notes 2 and 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in affiliates (Notes 2 and 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes (Note 8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term loans receivable (Note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease investment assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets (Note 6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

57,862
61,273
1,253
15,778
7,821
446
14,024(46)

42,85488,37810,441
14,381
7,937
436
15,179(46)

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥402,784¥432,249

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
A-3

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheets—(Continued)
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013
(unaudited)

Liabilities and Net Assets
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable (Note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 21,811
Current portion of convertible bonds (Note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—Current portion of long-term loans payable (Note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,531
Lease obligations, current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
201
Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19,781
Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,093
Advance payments received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,807
Asset retirement obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,149Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Convertible bonds (Note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term loans payable (Note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes (Note 8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employees’ retirement benefits (Note 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset retirement obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Guarantee deposits received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 17)
Net assets (Notes 9 and 11):
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock:
Authorized—750,000,000 shares at 31st March, 2012 and 2013
Issued—225,000,000 shares at 31st March, 2012 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock, at cost:— 28,834,693 shares at 31st March, 2012 and 27,384,993 shares at
31st March, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 20,498
49,9962,453
268
18,664
11,318
5,184
3
9,806

69,381
49,9976,677
411
27
17,251
699
64

118,190
—
4,250
342
38
17,965601—

18,60014,800286,90718,60014,800305,058(68,841)(65,381)

Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Valuation difference on available-for-sale securities (Note 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

251,466

273,077

7,966(2,575)

17,937(1,640)Total accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,391

16,297

Share subscription rights (Note 18) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minority interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,420
—

1,411
78

Total net assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

258,277

290,863

Total liabilities and net assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥402,784¥432,249

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
A-4

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
Millions of yen
Year ended 31st March,
2011
2012
2013
(Unaudited)(Unaudited)

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥326,329
233,120¥335,555
235,516¥363,891
262,315Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expenses (Notes 13 and 14) . . . . . . . . . .

93,20954,782100,039
56,886

101,576
57,562

Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expenses):
Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain (loss) on investment securities (Note 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on bargain purchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on investments in affiliates (Note 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reversal of share-based compensation (Note 18) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impact of applying accounting standard for asset retirement
obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

38,42743,15344,014

1,585
(8)
(12)
—
130
—
—
—
—

1,363
(71)
111
—
(130)
—
8,564
3,011
73

1,268
(57)
339
(7,732)
(75)
4,661
—
—
158

(364)
96

—
131

—
291

1,427

13,052(1,147)39,85456,20542,867

14,865
1,799

19,501
3,783

16,679(2,419)16,66423,284

14,260

Income before minority interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) attributable to minority interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

23,1902

32,921—

28,607(3)

Net income (Note 11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 23,188¥ 32,921¥ 28,610¥¥¥

Income before income taxes and minority interests . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes (Note 8):
Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income (loss) attributable to minority interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before minority interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (Note 15):
Valuation difference on available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share of other comprehensive income of affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

223,190—32,921(3)
28,607(2,178)
(406)
(13)

1,708
94
6

9,701
898
307

Total other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(2,597)

1,808

10,906Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 20,593¥ 34,729¥ 39,513

Comprehensive income attributable to:Comprehensive income attributable to owners of the parent . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive income attributable to minority interests . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 20,591
2¥ 34,729—¥ 39,516(3)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
A-5

A-6
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—

—

705

(944)
28,610(10,220)

286,907——(735)
32,921(10,145)

—

—

—
—
—

(68,841)
3,460

—

—
—
—

(72,285)
3,444

—

—
—
—

—

705

(944)
28,610(10,220)

251,466
3,460

—

(929)
32,921(10,145)

226,175
3,444

—

(24)
23,188(10,122)¥17,937

9,971

—

—
—
—

7,966
—

1,708

—
—
—

6,258
—

(2,178)———¥ 8,436—¥(1,640)

935

—

—
—
—

(2,575)
—

100

—
—
—

(2,675)
—

(419)

—
—
—

¥(2,256)—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

¥14,800 ¥305,058 ¥(65,381) ¥273,077

14,800———18,600
—

(194)
—
—

264,866———
14,994——23,188(10,122)(24)——¥15,018 ¥251,800 ¥(72,526) ¥212,892
—
—
241
241

—
—
—

18,600—

Balance at 31st March, 2013
(Unaudited) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥18,600

Balance at 1st April, 2012 . . . . . . . . . .
Disposition of treasury stock . . . . .
Loss on disposition of treasury
stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change of scope of equity
method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net changes other than inshareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . .

Balance at 1st April, 2011
(Unaudited) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Disposition of treasury stock . . . . .
Loss on disposition of treasury
stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net changes other than inshareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . .

Balance at 1st April, 2010
(Unaudited) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥18,600
Disposition of treasury stock . . . . .
—Loss on disposition of treasury
stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . .
—Net changes other than inshareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . .
—Shareholders’ equity¥16,297

10,906

—

—
—
—

5,391
—

1,808

—
—
—

3,583
—

(2,597)———¥ 6,180—¥1,411

(9)

—

—
—
—

1,420
—

103

—
—
—

1,317
—

162

—
—
—

¥1,155
—

¥ 78

78

—

—
—
—

—
—

—

—
—
—

—
—

(10)

—
—
—

¥ 10
—

¥290,863

10,975705(944)
28,610(10,220)

258,277
3,460

1,911

(929)
32,921(10,145)

231,075
3,444(2,445)(24)
23,188(10,122)¥220,237
241

Millions of yen
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Valuation
Total
difference
Foreignaccumulated
Additional
Treasury
Total
on available- currency
other
Share
Common paid-in
Retainedstock, shareholders’for-saletranslation comprehensive subscription Minority
Total
stock
capitalearnings
at costequitysecurities adjustment
incomerightsinterests net assets

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Millions of yen
Year ended 31st March,
2011
2012
2013
(Unaudited)(Unaudited)

Cash flows from operating activities
Income before income taxes and minority interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile income before income taxes and minority interests
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss (gain) on investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on bargain purchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on investments in affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impact of applying accounting standard for asset retirement
obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable and other receivables, net of advance payments
received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employees’ retirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 39,854¥ 56,205¥ 42,867

30,666(1,585)
8
—
(130)
—
—

30,875(4,374)71—
130—(8,564)42,475(1,268)57
7,732
75(4,661)
—

364

—

—

(1,727)(23)(4,305)176(3,463)
2,872(5,728)
(42)
1,482
78
(3,438)
834

1,834
(7)
(4,218)(18)(1,728)(683)

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest and dividends received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62,7071,395(5)(15,319)

67,5294,499(72)(18,889)

82,457
1,528(56)(15,564)

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

48,77853,06768,365

Cash flows from investing activities
Payments for time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of short-term investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales and redemption of short-term investment securities . . . .
Acquisition of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of software and other intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of software and other intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments for asset retirement obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales and redemption of investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of investments in affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of investments in affiliates (Note 16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1,129)331(19,933)
6,300(9,565)
5(10,211)
—
(64)
(31)
6,558
(15)
—
30

(782)
853
(13,234)
14,910(20,848)
34(21,399)346(31)(29,285)
5,351—
16,32627(1,111)
1,051—
11,800(15,668)
1,158(16,162)—(40)(21,415)
6,614(2,264)—17

Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥(27,724) ¥(47,732) ¥(36,020)

A-7

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—(Continued)
Millions of yen
Year ended 31st March,
2011
2012
2013
(Unaudited)(Unaudited)

Cash flows from financing activities
Increase in short-term loans payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in short-term loans payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from long-term loans payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of long-term loans payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from issuance of short-term bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Redemption of short-term bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of obligation under finance leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 3,500 ¥ 6,922 ¥
554(3,500)(6,922)(554)
11,783———(2,575)(2,506)
9,997——(10,000)
—
—
(69)
(53)
(107)
(0)
2,337
2,344
(10,121) (10,148) (10,219)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,590(10,439)(10,488)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . .

(335)

63

722

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22,30959,776(5,041)
82,08522,57977,044

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year (Note 10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 82,085¥ 77,044¥ 99,623

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
A-8

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
The NRI Group (Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. (the “Company”) and its 21 consolidated subsidiaries) and
its affiliates (3 companies) engage in the following four business services: “consulting services,” comprised ofresearch, management consulting and system consulting; “system development & application sales,” comprisedof system development and the sales of package software products; “system management & operation services,”comprised of outsourcing services, multi-user system services, and information services; and “product sales.”Information on the Company’s operations by segment is included in Note 19.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries areprepared on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in Japan, which are different in certain respects
as to the application and disclosure requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards, and arecompiled from the consolidated financial statements prepared by the Company as required by the Financial
Instruments and Exchange Law.
In addition, the notes to the consolidated financial statements include information which is not required
under accounting principles generally accepted in Japan but is presented herein as additional information.
Certain reclassifications have been made to present the accompanying consolidated financial statements in aformat which is familiar to readers outside Japan.
Basis of Consolidation and Application of Equity Method
The accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and 2013
include the accounts of the Company and all companies which are controlled directly or indirectly by theCompany. All subsidiaries (15, 15 and 21 for the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively)
have been consolidated. The major consolidated subsidiaries are NRI Netcom, Ltd., NRI SecureTechnologies,
Ltd., and NRI System Techno, LTD. as of 31st March, 2013.
The Company’s investments in affiliated companies over which it has the ability to exercise significant
influence are accounted for by the equity method, and, accordingly, the Company’s share of such affiliates’
income or loss is included in consolidated income. All affiliated companies (2, 2 and 3 for the years ended
31st March, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively) have been accounted for by the equity method. The affiliatedcompanies are Nippon Clearing Services Co., Ltd., and MC NRI GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC., and Daiko
Clearing Services Corporation (“Daiko Clearing Services”) as of 31st March, 2013.
NRI System Techno, LTD., Nomura Research Institute Financial Technologies India Private Limited and
UBsecure, Inc., newly acquired subsidiaries, and Nomura Research Institute Taiwan Co., Ltd. and Nomura
Research Institute Seoul Co., Ltd., newly established subsidiaries during the year ended 31st March, 2013, areincluded in the scope of consolidation.
The Company acquired additional shares of Daiko Clearing Services during the year ended 31st March,
2013. As a result, this affiliated company is newly accounted for by the equity method.
A-9

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents, as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows, are defined as low-risk, highly
liquid, short-term investments maturing within three months from their respective acquisition dates which arereadily convertible into cash.
Investment Securities
The Company holds investment securities in its major shareholder, Nomura Holdings, Inc. The Company’s
investment in Nomura Holdings, Inc. is included in “Investments in affiliates.”
The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries determine the appropriate classification of investment
securities as either trading, held-to-maturity or available-for-sale securities based on their holding objectives.
Available-for-sale securities include marketable securities and non-marketable securities.
Securities held for trading purposes are stated at market value and the cost of securities sold is determinedby the moving average method.
Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost.
Marketable securities classified as available-for-sale securities are stated at market value as of the balance
sheet date and the cost of securities sold is determined by the moving average method. Unrealized gain or loss onmarketable securities classified as available-for-sale securities is included as a separate component of net assets,
net of the applicable taxes.
Non-marketable securities classified as available-for-sale securities are stated at cost and the cost of
securities sold is determined by the moving average method.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at cost based on the identified cost method (in cases where profitability has declined,
the book value is reduced accordingly).
Depreciation of Property and Equipment (other than leased assets)
Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated principally by the declining-balancemethod over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Buildings (excluding structures attached to thebuildings) acquired on or after 1st April, 1998 by the Company and its domestic consolidated subsidiaries are
depreciated by the straight-line method over their respective estimated useful lives.
Amortization of Software and Other Intangibles (other than leased assets)
Development costs of computer software to be sold are amortized by the straight-line method over a usefullife of three years, based on the estimated volume of sales or the estimated sales revenue with the minimum
amortization amount. Software intended for use by the Company for the purpose of rendering customer services
is being amortized by the straight-line method over useful lives of up to five years.
Other intangible assets are amortized by the straight-line method over their respective estimated useful lives.
A-10

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
Depreciation and Amortization of Leased Assets
Leased tangible assets under finance leases that do not transfer ownership are mainly depreciated by the
declining-balance method over the lease period. Leased intangible assets under finance leases that do not transfer
ownership are amortized by the straight-line method over the lease period.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts has been provided based on the Company’s and its consolidated
subsidiaries’ historical experience with respect to write-offs and an estimate of the amount of specificuncollectible accounts.
Retirement and Severance Benefits for Employees
The allowance for employees’ retirement benefits has been provided on an accrual basis as of the balance
sheet date based on an estimate of the projected benefit obligation and the employees’ pension plan assets. The
retirement benefit obligation at transition was fully expensed upon transition. Prior service liability is amortizedby the straight-line method over a defined period, not exceeding the average remaining service period of theemployees (15 years). Actuarial gain or loss is amortized by the straight-line method over a defined period, notexceeding the average remaining service period of the employees (10 to 15 years) from the next fiscal year after
the incurrence.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues arising from made-to-order software and consulting projects are recognized by the percentage-ofcompletion method. The percent completed is estimated by the ratio of the costs incurred to the estimated total
costs.
Appropriation of Capital Surplus and Retained Earnings
Under the Corporation Law of Japan, the appropriation of capital surplus and retained earnings with respect
to a given period is made by resolution of the shareholders at a general meeting or by resolution of the Board of
Directors. Appropriations from capital surplus and retained earnings are reflected in the consolidated financial
statements applicable to the period in which such resolutions are approved.
Accounting Change(Changes in accounting policies that are difficult to distinguish from changes in accounting estimates)
In response to a revision of the Corporation Tax Law of Japan, the Company and its domestic consolidated
subsidiaries have changed the method of depreciation for tangible fixed assets acquired on or after 1st April,2012 in accordance with the provisions of the revised Corporation Tax Law. As a result of this change, operating
profit and income before income taxes and minority interests for the year ended 31st March, 2013 increased by¥348 million from the corresponding amounts which would have been recorded under the previous method.
Accounting Standards to Be Applied“Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits” (Accounting Standards Board of Japan (ASBJ) Statement
No.26 of 17th May, 2012) and the “Guidance on Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits” (ASBJ Guidance
No.25 of 17th May, 2012)
A-11

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)1)

Overview
From the perspective of improving financial reporting and in light of global trends, the accounting
standard and related guidance have been revised mainly in the areas of the accounting treatment forunrecognized actuarial gains and losses and unrecognized prior service costs, the calculation method
for retirement benefit obligations and service costs and the enhancement of disclosure.

2)

Scheduled date of application
From the beginning of annual periods beginning on or after 1st April, 20133)

Impact of application of accounting standards
The impact of the application of these accounting standards on the consolidated financial statements is
expected to be immaterial.

Additional Information(Accounting for Trust-type Employee Stock Ownership Incentive Plan)
The Company introduced a “Trust-type Employee Stock Ownership Incentive Plan” in March 2011. The
purpose of this plan is to promote the Company’s perpetual growth by providing incentives to employees forincreasing the Company’s corporate value in the mid- to long-term and to enhance benefits and welfare of
employees.
This is an incentive plan under which gains from the Company’s share price appreciation are returned to allparticipants in the Employee Stock Ownership Group (the “ESOP Group”).
The “Employee Stock Ownership Trust” (the “ESOP Trust”) was established exclusively for the ESOP
Group to carry out this plan. The ESOP Trust acquired a number of the Company’s shares, which the ESOP
Group would acquire over a period of five years subsequent to the establishment of the ESOP Trust. Then, theESOP Trust sells them to the ESOP Group each time the ESOP Group makes an acquisition of the Company’s
shares. When the share price appreciates and earnings have accumulated in the ESOP Trust upon its termination,a cash distribution of the funds will be made to each beneficiary in proportion to the respective beneficiary’s
contribution. Since the Company guarantees the loans of the ESOP Trust taken out to purchase the Company’s
shares, the Company is obligated to pay the remaining liabilities of the ESOP Trust under a guarantee agreement
if any obligations remain upon termination of the ESOP Trust.
The Company accounts for the transactions involving the ESOP Trust as its own with the assets, liabilities,
expenses and income of the ESOP Trust included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Therefore, the Company’s shares owned by the ESOP Trust are treated as treasury stock of the Company, and theloans of the ESOP Trust are treated as the loans of the Company. Also, the Company does not recognize thetransfer of treasury stock when the Company sells treasury stock to the ESOP Trust. Each time the ESOP Trust
sells treasury stock to the ESOP Group, however, the Company recognizes the transfer of treasury stock. As theamounts equal to the capital gain realized by the ESOP Trust will be distributed to the beneficiaries after thetermination of the trust, the amounts are treated as expenses for the corresponding year the gain is incurred.
The ESOP Trust owned 3,520,800 shares of the Company’s at 31st March, 2013.
A-12

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
2. Financial Instruments
1)

Qualitative information(a) Policy for financial instruments
In the course of business operations, the Company raises short-term funds through bank loans andcommercial paper, and raises long-term funds through bank loans and issuances of corporate bonds.
The Company manages funds by utilizing low-risk financial instruments. The Company’s policy is to
only enter into derivative transactions to reduce risks, and not for speculative purposes.
(b) Details of financial instruments and related risk and risk management system
Although accounts receivable and other receivables, are exposed to customers’ credit risk, thehistorical loan loss ratio is low and those receivables are usually settled in a short period of time. The
Company tries to reduce credit risk by managing due dates and balances of each customer, as well as
monitoring and analyzing customers’ credit status. The Company has little exposure of foreign
currency exchange risk, since those receivables are mostly in Japanese yen. Investment securities,
comprised of shares of companies with which the Company has operational relationships, bonds andbond investment trusts, are exposed to issuers’ credit risk, risks of volatility of market prices, andforeign currency exchange and interest rates. To reduce these risks, the Company monitors market
value and the issuers’ financial status periodically. Long-term loans receivable is a construction
assistance fund receivable due January 2017. Accounts payable are settled in a short period of time.
Redemption of the convertible bonds, issued by the Company for capital expenditures, is March 2014.
Long-term loans payable relates to the borrowing by the ESOP Trust to introduce the “Trust-type
Employee Stock Ownership Incentive Plan.” Final installment payment is April 2016. Variable interest
rates applied to long-term loans payable are exposed to interest rate fluctuation risk. The Company
reduces liquidity risk relating to raising funds by developing a cash flow plan to manage all surplus
funds in the Group, and by holding various financing methods.
(c) Supplementary explanation of the fair value of financial instruments
The fair value of financial instruments is based on their quoted market price, and when there is noquoted market price available, fair value is based on management assumption. Since various
assumptions and factors are reflected in estimating the fair value, differences in the assumptions andfactors may result in different indications of fair value.

A-13

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
2)

Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amount of financial instruments on the consolidated balance sheets as of 31st March, 2012 and2013 and estimated fair value are shown in the following table. The following table does not include nonmarketable securities whose fair value is not readily determinable (see Note 2).
Millions of yen
31st March, 2012
31st March, 2013
Carrying EstimatedCarrying Estimatedamountfair value Difference amountfair value Difference

Assets:Cash and bank deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 8,462 ¥ 8,462
Accounts receivable and other receivables . . .
76,192
76,192
Short-term investment securities, investment
securities, and investments in affiliates . . . 135,869 135,869
Long-term loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,821
8,274
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥228,344 ¥228,797¥——¥ 10,274 ¥ 10,274 ¥
76,53076,530—453

180,870 178,257
7,937
8,367

¥ 453

—
—

(2,613)430¥275,611 ¥273,428 ¥(2,183)

Liabilities:
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 21,811 ¥ 21,811
Convertible bonds* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49,99749,297Long-term loans payable** . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,208
9,208

¥—
¥ 20,498 ¥ 20,498 ¥(700)
49,99649,996
—
6,703
6,703

—
—
—

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 81,016 ¥ 80,316¥(700) ¥ 77,197 ¥ 77,197 ¥—*Convertible bonds as of 31st March, 2013 are the current portion of convertible bonds.

**

Long-term loans payable included the current portion of long-term loans payable totaling ¥2,531 millionand ¥2,453 million as of 31st March, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Note 1: Methods to determine the estimated fair value of financial instruments.
Assetsa.

Cash and bank deposits
Their carrying amount approximates the fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

b.

Accounts receivable and other receivables
Their carrying amount approximates the fair value due to the generally short maturities of these
instruments. For those receivables due after one year, the present value is further discounted by the rate
corresponding to the credit risk and the amount is presented in the consolidated balance sheet,
therefore, the carrying amount approximates fair value.

c.

Short-term investment securities, investment securities and investments in affiliates
The fair value of stocks is based on quoted market prices. The fair value of bonds is based on either
quoted market prices or prices provided by the financial institution making markets in these securities.

d.

Long-term loans receivable
Long-term loans receivable consists of deposits and guarantee money. The fair value of long-term
receivables is based on the present value of the total future cash flows, which are the principal and theinterest, discounted by risk free rate relating to the time remaining until maturity.
A-14

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
Liabilitiesa.

Accounts payable
Their carrying amount approximates the fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

b.

Convertible bonds
The fair value of convertible bonds is based on the quoted market price.

c.

Long-term loans payable
The fair value of long-term loans payable, to which variable rates are applied, approximates the
carrying amount because the variable rates reflect market interest rates over a short term.

Note 2: Non-marketable securities whose fair value is not readily determinable are as follows.
Millions of yen
31st March, 31st March,
2012
2013

Unlisted companies’ shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥7,623113¥7,959176*1. Unlisted companies’ shares are not measured at fair value because they have no market prices on exchanges,
and their fair value is not readily determinable. Unlisted companies’ shares included investments inaffiliates accounted for under the equity method totaling ¥887 million and ¥1,069 million as of 31st March,2012 and 2013, respectively.
*2. For investments in partnerships, when all or a part of the asset of partnership consist of non-marketablesecurities whose fair value is not readily determinable, such components are not measured at fair value.
Note 3: Redemption schedule for cash and bank deposits, receivables and marketable securities withmaturities at 31st March, 2012 and 2013
Millions of yen
31st March, 2012
31st March, 2013
Due after Due after
Due after Due after
one year five years
one year five years
Due within
throughthrough
Due within
throughthrough
one yearfive years ten years
one yearfive years ten years

Cash and bank deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale securities withmaturities:
Government bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 8,462
56,486

¥

—
—

¥—
—

¥10,274
53,959

¥

—
80

¥—

—
18,300100—

25,000
—
—
8,400

1
—
—
—

10,000———35,001
—
—
8,400

—
—
—
—

¥83,348¥33,400

1¥74,233¥43,481¥¥* Other receivables are not included in the above table as there is no applicable redemption schedule.
A-15

1

1

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
Note 4: Repayment schedule for convertible bonds and long-term loans payable at 31st March, 2012 and2013

Due within
one yearConvertible bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term loans payable* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Convertible bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term loans payable* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥Millions of yen
31st March, 2012
Due after
Due after
Due after
Due after
one year
two years three years four years
throughthroughthroughthrough
two years three years four years five years—
2,531¥ 2,531¥49,997
2,487¥52,484

Due within
one year

Millions of yen
31st March, 2013
Due after
Due after
Due after
Due after
one year
two years three years four years
throughthroughthroughthrough
two years three years four years five years¥49,996
2,453¥52,449¥—
2,416¥ 2,416¥ —2,442¥2,442¥ —
1,834¥1,834¥ —1,748¥1,748

¥ —
—
¥ —

¥—
—
¥—

¥—
—
¥—

* Long-term loans payable represents loans by the ESOP Trust upon introduction of the “Trust-type Employee
Stock Ownership Incentive Plan.” Under the loan contracts, the timing of the installment payments isdetermined, but the amount of each installment payment is not specified. Therefore, the repayment schedule
was calculated at an estimated amount by reference to the acquisition price of the Company’s shares that the
ESOP Group was expected to purchase from the ESOP Trust.
3. Investments
The Company did not hold any held-to-maturity securities with determinable market value at 31st March,2012 and 2013.
The following is a summary of the information concerning available-for-sale securities included in shortterm investment securities, investment securities and investments in affiliates at 31st March, 2012 and 2013:
Securities Classified as Available-for-Sale Securities
Millions of yen
31st March, 2012
31st March, 2013
Acquisition Carrying Unrealized Acquisition Carrying Unrealized
cost
amountgain (loss)
cost
amountgain (loss)

Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 17,558 ¥ 29,465 ¥11,907 ¥ 17,506 ¥ 43,263 ¥25,757
Bonds:
Government bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25,44025,45616
45,45145,51665
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18,32918,296(33)———
43,76943,752(17) 45,451
45,51665
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
69,55969,501(58) 90,411
90,362(49)
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥130,886 ¥142,718 ¥11,832 ¥153,368 ¥179,141 ¥25,773
A-16

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
Non-marketable securities whose fair value is not readily determinable were included in the above table.
“Acquisition cost” in the above table is the carrying amount after recognizing impairment loss. Impairment loss
on available-for-sale securities whose fair value is not readily determinable as a result of a permanent decline invalue for the years ended 31st March, 2012 and 2013 amounted to ¥237 million and ¥69 million, respectively.
The Company has established a policy for the recognition of impairment losses under the following conditions:i)

For marketable securities whose fair value has declined by 30% or more, the Company recognizes
impairment loss except in cases where the decline in fair value is expected to be recoverable.

ii)

For non-marketable securities whose fair value is not readily determinable, of which net asset value has
declined by 50% or more, the Company recognizes impairment loss except in cases where the decline in fairvalue is expected to be recoverable.
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities during the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and 2013
were as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2011
2012
2013

Proceeds (Note 16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥226 ¥16,546 ¥ 2Gross gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
168
8,714
—
Gross loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—(22) —
Non-marketable securities whose fair value is not readily determinable were included in the above table.
4. Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables
For projects that have not been completed as of the balance sheet date, the percentage-of-completion method
is applied and the estimated revenue to be earned from each project has been included in accounts receivable andother receivables in the amounts of ¥19,706 million and ¥22,490 million at 31st March, 2012 and 2013,
respectively.
5. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment at 31st March, 2012 and 2013 is summarized as follows:
Years
UsefulLife

Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 – 50
Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 – 15
Leased assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 13,600 ¥ 12,141
70,84278,75656,90755,780
320
545
7,789
—
(81,889) (83,766)

Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 67,569

A-17¥ 63,456

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
6. Other Assets
Other assets at 31st March, 2012 and 2013 consisted of the following:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Lease deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥10,720
3,304¥10,839
4,340

Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥14,024¥15,179“Other” includes golf club memberships.
7. Retirement and Severance Benefits
The Company has a defined benefit pension plan, a lump-sum payment plan and a defined contribution
pension plan. In addition to the plans, an extra retirement payment may be provided. The Company also has an
employee retirement benefit trust. Certain consolidated subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans, defined
benefit lump-sum payment plans, employees’ pension fund trusts and defined contribution pension plans.
The following table sets forth the funded and accrued status of the retirement and severance benefit plans
and the amounts recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at 31st March, 2012 and 2013 for
the Company’s and its consolidated subsidiaries’ defined benefit plans:Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Retirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan assets at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥(73,273) ¥(90,743)
49,98969,423

Unfunded retirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized actuarial gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(23,284)
8,175(2,142)(21,320)
5,699(1,947)

Net retirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid pension cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(17,251)—(17,568)
397

Employees’ retirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥(17,251) ¥(17,965)

Certain consolidated subsidiaries adopt the simplified method for calculating retirement benefit obligations.
Plan assets at fair value include those of the employee retirement benefit trust of ¥6,371 million and¥8,109 million at 31st March, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
The substitutional portion of the employees’ pension fund is included in the above table.
Prior service liability is amortized by the straight-line method over a defined period, not exceeding the
average remaining service period of the employees (15 years).
A-18

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
Actuarial gain or loss is amortized by the straight-line method over a defined period, not exceeding the
average remaining service period of the employees (15 years, 15 years and 10 to 15 years ended 31st March,
2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively) from the next fiscal year after the incurrence.
The components of retirement benefit expenses for the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and 2013 areoutlined as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2011
2012
2013

Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥3,928 ¥4,070 ¥4,834
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,245
1,332
1,362
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(438)
(546)
(676)
Recognized actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
102
196
515
Recognized prior service liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(195)
(195)
(195)
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,642
1,617

4,857
1,728

5,840
1,809

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥6,259¥6,585¥7,649Retirement benefit expenses for the consolidated subsidiaries that adopt the simplified method are included
in “Service cost.”
Contributions to the defined contribution pension plan are included in “Other” in the above table.
The amount of employee contributions to the employees’ pension fund is excluded from the above table.
The assumptions used in accounting for the above plans are summarized as follows:
31st March,2011 2012 2013

Discount rates at the end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected rate of return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average rates are used as of 31st March, 2013 in the above table.

A-19

2.1% 1.8% 1.4%
1.5 1.5 1.5

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
8. Income Taxes
The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities at 31st March, 2012 and 2013 wereas follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Deferred income tax assets:
Employees’ retirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued bonuses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Valuation difference on available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special tax-purpose reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 8,355
10,417
4,968
3,246¥ 8,283
13,425
5,230
3,245

26,98630,183(3,866)
(257)
(19)
(27)

(8,043)
(300)
(103)
(103)

(4,169)(8,549)¥22,817¥21,634

Income taxes applicable to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries consisted of corporation,
inhabitants’ and enterprise taxes which, in the aggregate, resulted in statutory tax rates of approximately 40.6%,
40.6% and 38.0% for the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
A reconciliation of the difference between the statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate
after deferred tax effect in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the year ended
31st March, 2013 is as follows:
31st March,
2013

Statutory income tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reconciliation:
Non-deductible permanent differences such as entertainment expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-taxable permanent differences such as dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in non-deductible write-downs of investment securities and other items whoseschedule of reversal is uncertain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on bargain purchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Others, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

38.0%

Effective income tax rate after deferred tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33.3%

0.7
(0.4)
(1.2)
(4.1)
0.3

Reconciliations of the differences between the statutory income tax rates and the effective income tax rates
after deferred tax effect in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the years ended
31st March, 2011 and 2012 have been omitted because the differences were immaterial.
A-20

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
9. Net Assets
The Corporation Law of Japan provides that earnings in an amount equal to at least 10% of dividends ofcapital surplus and retained earnings shall be appropriated to the legal reserve until the aggregate amount of thelegal reserve and additional paid-in capital equals 25% of the stated capital. The legal reserve and the additional
paid-in capital account are available for appropriation by resolution of the shareholders. In accordance with the
Corporation Law, the Company provides a legal reserve which is included in retained earnings. This reserveamounted to ¥570 million and ¥570 million at 31st March, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Shares Issued and Treasury Stock
The total number and periodic changes in the number of shares issued and treasury stock for the years ended
31st March, 2012 and 2013 are summarized as follows:

Number of shares at 31st March, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in number of shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in number of shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of shares at 31st March, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in number of shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in number of shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of shares at 31st March, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
*1*2

SharesissuedTreasurystock

225,000,000——
225,000,000

30,277,343
50
1,442,700
28,834,693
36
1,449,736
27,384,993—
225,000,000

The number of common shares of treasury stock increased by 50 and 36 due to the purchases of odd-lot
shares for the years ended 31 March, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The number of common shares oftreasury stock decreased by 1,336,200 and 1,344,500 due to the transfer of treasury stock from the ESOP
Trust to the ESOP Group and decreased by 106,500 and 105,000 due to the exercise of stock options for theyears ended 31 March, 2012 and 2013, respectively, and decreased by 236 due to the exercise of convertible
bonds for the year ended 31st March, 2013.
Treasury stock included 4,865,300 and 3,520,800 common shares of the Company owned by the ESOP
Trust as of 31st March, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Share subscription rights recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at 31st March, 2013
relate to the Company’s stock option plans described in Note 18.
Dividends
The following appropriations of cash dividends to shareholders of common stock were approved at meetingsof the Board of Directors held on 18th May, 2011 and 28th October, 2011 and were paid to shareholders based on
the record as of 31st March, 2011 and 30th September, 2011, respectively, during the year ended 31st March,
2012:
Millions of yen

Cash dividends approved on 18th May, 2011* (¥26.00 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends approved on 28th October, 2011** (¥26.00 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
***¥5,063
5,082

The record date and effective date were 31st March, 2011 and 3rd June, 2011, respectively.
Dividends of ¥161 million paid to the ESOP Trust are not included in the total dividends amount.
The record date and effective date were 30th September, 2011 and 30th November, 2011, respectively.
Dividends of ¥144 million paid to the ESOP Trust are not included in the total dividends amount.
A-21

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
The following appropriation of cash dividends, which has not been reflected in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31st March, 2012, was approved at a meeting of the Boardof Directors held on 17th May, 2012 and went into effect on 4th June, 2012:
Millions of yen

Cash dividends approved on 17th May, 2012* (¥26.00 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥5,100* The record date and effective date were 31st March, 2012 and 4th June, 2012, respectively.
Dividends of ¥126 million paid to the ESOP Trust are not included in the total dividends amount.
The following appropriations of cash dividends to shareholders of common stock were approved at meetingsof the Board of Directors held on 17th May, 2012 and 26th October, 2012 and were paid to shareholders based on
the record as of 31st March, 2012 and 30th September, 2012, respectively, during the year ended 31st March,
2013:
Millions of yen

Cash dividends approved on 17th May, 2012* (¥26.00 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends approved on 26th October, 2012** (¥26.00 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
***¥5,100¥5,120

The record date and effective date were 31st March, 2012 and 4th June, 2012, respectively.
Dividends of ¥126 million paid to the ESOP Trust are not included in the total dividends amount.
The record date and effective date were 30th September, 2012 and 30th November, 2012, respectively.
Dividends of ¥109 million paid to the ESOP Trust are not included in total dividends amount.

The following appropriation of cash dividends, which has not been reflected in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31st March, 2013, was approved at a meeting of the Boardof Directors held on 15th May, 2013 and went into effect on 3rd June, 2013:
Millions of yen

Cash dividends approved on 15th May, 2013* (¥26.00 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥5,138* The record date and effective date were 31st March, 2013 and 3rd June, 2013, respectively.
Dividends of ¥92 million paid to the ESOP Trust are not included in the total dividends amount.
10. Cash and Cash Equivalents
A reconciliation between cash and bank deposits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and cash
and cash equivalents in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows at 31st March, 2012 and 2013 is
as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Cash and bank deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits with maturities of more than three months when deposited . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bond and other investments maturing in more than three months from the acquisition
date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 8,462 ¥10,274
81,07990,186(706)(837)(11,791)—

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 77,044¥99,623

A-22

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
11. Per Share Data
Earnings per share for the years ended at 31st March, 2011, 2012, and 2013 and net assets per share at
31st March, 2012 and 2013 are summarized as follows:
Yen
31st March,
2012

2011

2013

Earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥119.11 ¥168.40 ¥145.28
Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
112.22158.69136.97Yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Net assets per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,309.39¥1,464.33

The computation of earnings and net assets per share is based on the weighted-average number of shares ofcommon stock outstanding during each year and the number of shares of common stock outstanding at eachbalance sheet date, respectively.
The computation of earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the years ended 31st March, 2011,2012 and 2013 is as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012

2011

2013

Numerator:
Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings not attributable to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥23,188 ¥32,921 ¥28,610
(— )
(— )
(— )

Earnings attributable to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥23,188¥32,921¥28,610

Thousands of shares

Denominator:
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding—basic* . . . . 194,677 195,492 196,937
Potentially dilutive shares of common stock:
Convertible bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,836 11,839 11,839
Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
121
119
100
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11,957

11,958

11,939Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding—diluted . . . . . . . 206,634 207,450 208,876* The Company’s shares owned by the ESOP Trust are included in treasury stock. The ESOP Trust owned
4,865,300 and 3,520,800 shares of the Company as of 31st March, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

A-23

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
The following potentially issuable shares of common stock would have an antidilutive effect and thus havenot been included in the diluted earnings per share calculation for the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and2013:a) 6th share subscription rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b) 8th share subscription rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c) 10th share subscription rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d) 12th share subscription rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e) 14th share subscription rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f) 16th share subscription rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
g) 18th share subscription rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2011

Shares31st March,
2012

2013

367,500
415,000
417,500
440,000
445,000——

340,000
367,500
417,500
440,000
445,000
392,500—

280,000
315,000
335,000
428,000
445,000
392,500
385,000

The computation of net assets per share at 31st March, 2012 and 2013 is summarized as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Numerator:
Net assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share subscription rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minority interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥258,277 ¥290,863(1,420)(1,411)—(78)

Net assets attributable to common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥256,857¥289,374

Thousands of shares

Denominator:
Number of shares of common stock outstanding* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

196,165

197,615* The Company’s shares owned by the ESOP Trust are included in treasury stock. The ESOP Trust owned
4,865,300 and 3,520,800 shares of the Company as of 31st March, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
12. Leases
1)

As lessee
The Company leases mainly computers and related devices, some of which are classified as finance leases.
Future minimum lease payments for noncancelable operating leases at 31st March, 2012 and 2013 aresummarized as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Future minimum lease payments:
Due within one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 5,179
14,409¥ 5,579
11,689Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥19,588¥17,268

A-24

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)2)

As lessor
There were no finance lease transactions as lessor for the years ended 31st March, 2012 and 2013.
Future minimum lease payments to be received from operating leases as lessor at 31st March, 2012 and2013 are summarized as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Future minimum lease payments to be received:
Due within one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥202
35

¥129
14

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥237

¥143

13. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The details of selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and2013 are summarized as follows:

2011

Millions of yen
31st March,
2012

2013

Personnel expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¥30,447 ¥31,491 ¥31,630
Rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,126
4,716
4,701
Subcontractor costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,832
8,401
8,823
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12,377
12,27812,408
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥54,782¥56,886¥57,562

14. Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the years
ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and 2013 are summarized as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2011
2012
2013

Research and Development Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

A-25¥3,564¥3,643¥3,643

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
15. Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
Reclassification adjustments relating to other comprehensive income for the years ended 31st March, 2012
and 2013 are summarized as follows.
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Valuation difference on available-for-sale securities
Amount arising during the fiscal year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 9,867 ¥13,941(8,546)—

Valuation difference on available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,321

13,941

Foreign currency translation adjustment
Amount arising during the fiscal year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94

898

Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94

898

Share of other comprehensive income of affiliates accounted for using the equity method
Amount arising during the fiscal year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6307

Share of other comprehensive income of affiliates accounted for using the equity
method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6307

Total other comprehensive income before tax effect adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,421

15,146

Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

387(4,240)Total other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 1,808¥10,906

Tax effects relating to components of other comprehensive income for the years ended 31st March, 2012
and 2013 are summarized as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Valuation difference on available-for-sale securities
Before-tax amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net-of-tax amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,321387
1,708¥13,941(4,240)9,701

Foreign currency translation adjustment
Before-tax amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94
—

898
—

Net-of-tax amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94

898

Share of other comprehensive income of affiliates accounted for using the equity method
Before-tax amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6
—

307
—

Net-of-tax amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6307

Total other comprehensive income
Before-tax amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,421
387

15,146(4,240)Net-of-tax amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥1,808¥10,906

A-26

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
16. Related Party Transactions
Related party transactions for the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the respective balances
at 31st March, 2012 and 2013 were as follows:
1)

Transactions

Related partya) Major shareholder:
Nomura Holdings, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b) Major shareholder’s subsidiaries:
The Nomura Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. . . .
Nomura Real Estate Development Co.,
Ltd.*4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2)

Nature of transaction

Sales*1
Exchange of shares*2
Borrowings*3
Repayment of borrowings*3
Payments of interest*3¥51,750
17,873¥66,427
—

9,283
—
1

—
2,028
53

—
1,973
39

—

1,637

1,637

Nature of transactionb) Major shareholder’s subsidiaries:
The Nomura Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nomura Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.*4 . . . . . . . .

*3¥41,037—

Balancesa) Major shareholder:
Nomura Holdings, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

*2

2013

Rent*5

Related party

*1

2011

Millions of yen
31st March,
2012

Millions of yen
31st March,
2012
2013

Accounts receivable and otherreceivables*1¥11,738¥7,542Long-term loans payable*3
Long-term loans receivable*5
Lease deposits*5

7,255
7,821
1,793

5,281
7,937
1,793

The terms and conditions of the agreements were determined in the same way as ordinary transactions with
non-related parties through discussions with consideration of costs associated with system development,
application sales and system management and operation.
The share exchange involved shares of Nomura Land and Building Co., Ltd. owned by the Company andshares of Nomura Holdings, Inc. The Company received 118 shares of Nomura Holdings, Inc. for each
Nomura Land and Building Co., Ltd. share in reference to the valuation results provided by third-party
appraisers and the results of the calculation after applying the average market share price method.
The amount above was calculated based on the market value as of the effective date.
The Company sold the shares of Nomura Holdings, Inc. that it received in the exchange to a third party, anda gain on the sale of the shares is recognized as “Gain on investments in affiliates” in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the year ended 31st March, 2012.
The borrowing represents loans by the ESOP Trust upon introduction of the “Trust-type Employee Stock
Ownership Incentive Plan.” The term of the borrowing is five years (final repayment is in April 2016), withvariable interest rates. The borrowing is being repaid semiannually in installments, and the borrowing rate
has been determined based on the Company’s credit risk.
A-27

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)*4*5

Nomura Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., which was a subsidiary of the Company’s major shareholder“Nomura Holdings, Inc.”, ceased to be a Nomura Holdings Inc.’s subsidiary and related party of theCompany as of 21st March, 2013. In the above table, however, transactions with Nomura Real Estate
Development Co., Ltd. cover transactions to the end of the year ended 31st March, 2013, and balances arethose as of 31st March, 2013.
Long-term loans receivable is a construction assistance fund receivable corresponding to an office leasedeposit to be refunded in a lump sum 10 years after the initial guarantee deposit was made (January 2017).
The difference between the initial fair value, calculated as the disbursement amount discounted by themarket interest rate, and the initial loan amount is recognized as a long-term prepaid expense and is being
allocated as rent expense over 10 years (amount is not included in the transaction amount of the rent
presented above). The difference between the initial fair value and the reimbursement amount is being
allocated as an interest receivable over 10 years.
With regard to the rent, as presented above, the Company pays rent and a lease deposit (guarantee deposit),
which were determined by considering market prices of similar properties.

17. Contingent Liabilities
There were no material contingent liabilities at 31st March, 2012 and 2013.
18. Stock Option Plans
The Company issued the following share subscription rights for the purchase of new shares of common
stock in accordance with the former Commercial Code of Japan or the Corporation Law of Japan.
For the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Company recognized and allocated share-based
compensation cost as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2011
2012
2013

Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥173
206

¥167
184

¥158
158

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥379

¥351

¥316

For the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Company recognized reversal of share-based
compensation as follows:
Millions of yen
31st March,
2011
2012
2013

Reversal of share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

A-28

¥—

¥73

¥158

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
A description of each stock option plan as of 31st March, 2013 is summarized as follows:
6th stock option plan

8th stock option plan

10th stock option plan

Grantee categories andnumbers of grantees

36 directors or managing
officers of the Company,
and 6 directors of its
subsidiaries

37 directors, managing
officers or employees of
the Company, and 6
directors of its subsidiaries

36 directors or managing
officers of the Company,
and 6 directors of its
subsidiaries

Number of shares
reserved

400,000

422,500

417,500

Grant date

11th September, 2006

10th July, 2007

8th July, 2008

Vesting conditions

Holders must be incontinuous employment
from the grant date to thevesting date of 30th June,2009

Holders must be incontinuous employment
from the grant date to thevesting date of 30th June,2010

Holders must be incontinuous employment
from the grant date to thevesting date of 30th June,
2011

Service period

From 1st July, 2006 to
30th June, 2009

From 1st July, 2007 to
30th June, 2010

From 1st July, 2008 to
30th June, 2011

Exercisable period

1st July, 2009 to
30th June, 2013

1st July, 2010 to30th June, 2014

1st July, 2011 to30th June, 2015

12th stock option plan

14th stock option plan

15th stock option plan

Grantee categories andnumbers of grantees

39 directors or managing
officers of the Company,
and 7 directors of its
subsidiaries

39 directors or managing
officers of the Company,
and 8 directors of its
subsidiaries

41 directors, managing
officers or employees of
the Company, and 8
directors of its subsidiaries

Number of shares
reserved

440,000

445,000

103,000

Grant date

15th July, 200918th August, 2010

18th August, 2010

Vesting conditions

Holders must be incontinuous employment
from the grant date to thevesting date of 30th June,2012

Holders must be incontinuous employment
from the grant date to thevesting date of 30th June,2013

Holders must be incontinuous employment
from the grant date to thevesting date of 30th June,
2011

Service period

From 1st July, 2009 to
30th June, 2012

From 1st July, 2010 to30th June, 2013

From 1st July, 2010 to30th June, 2011

Exercisable period

1st July, 2012 to30th June, 2016

1st July, 2013 to30th June, 2017

1st July, 2011 to30th June, 2012

A-29

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
16th stock option plan

17th stock option plan

18th stock option plan

Grantee categories andnumbers of grantees

37 directors or managing
officers of the Company,
and 5 directors of its
subsidiaries

38 directors, managing
officers or employees of
the Company, and 5
directors of its subsidiaries

35 directors or managing
officers of the Company,
and 6 directors of its
subsidiaries

Number of shares
reserved

392,500

90,500385,000

Grant date

11th July, 2011

11th July, 2011

13th July, 2012

Vesting conditions

Holders must be incontinuous employment
from the grant date to thevesting date of 30th June,2014

Holders must be incontinuous employment
from the grant date to thevesting date of 30th June,2012

Holders must be incontinuous employment
from the grant date to thevesting date of 30th June,
2015

Service period

From 1st July, 2011 to30th June, 2014

From 1st July, 2011 to30th June, 2012

From 1st July, 2012 to30th June, 2015

Exercisable period

1st July, 2014 to30th June, 2018

1st July, 2012 to30th June, 2013

1st July, 2015 to30th June, 201919th stock option plan

Grantee categories andnumbers of grantees

36 directors, managing
officers or employees of
the Company, and 6
directors of its subsidiaries

Number of shares
reserved

88,500Grant date

13th July, 2012

Vesting conditions

Holders must be incontinuous employment
from the grant date to thevesting date of 30th June,2013

Service period

From 1st July, 2012 to30th June, 2013

Exercisable period

1st July, 2013 to30th June, 2014

A-30

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
The following table summarizes options activity under the stock option plans referred to above during theyear ended 31st March, 2013:
6th stock 8th stock 10th stock 12th stock 14th stock 15th stock 16th stock 17th stock 18th stock 19th stock
option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan option planNon-vested:
Beginning of theyear . . . . . . . . . . .
—Granted . . . . . . . . . .
—Forfeited . . . . . . . . .
—Vested . . . . . . . . . . .
—End of the year . . . .
—Vested:Beginning of theyear . . . . . . . . . . . 340,000
Vested . . . . . . . . . . .
—Exercised . . . . . . . . .
—Forfeited . . . . . . . . . (60,000)
End of the year . . . . 280,000

—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—

440,000——
440,000—

445,000———
445,000—————

392,500———
392,500

90,500——90,500——385,000——
385,000—
88,500——88,500367,500——(52,500)
315,000

417,500——(82,500)
335,000—
440,000(12,000)—
428,000—————

21,500—(21,500)
—
—

—
—
—
—
—

—
90,500(71,500)—
19,000

—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—

* For the stock options which become unexercisable, the Company has applied the same accounting treatment as to forfeited stock options.
The numbers of stock options presented above reflect such accounting treatment.

Price information per option for each stock option plan as of 31st March, 2013 is summarized as follows:
Yen
6th stock 8th stock 10th stock 12th stock 14th stock 15th stock 16th stock 17th stock 18th stock 19th stock
option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan option plan

Exercise price . . . . . . . . .
Average price on
exercise . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value on grant
date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥3,282¥3,680¥2,650¥2,090¥2,010

—

—

—

2,321

865

1,030

631

539

¥

1

¥1,869

—

1,740

284

1,534

¥

1

¥1,766

¥

1

—

1,727

—

—

460

1,792

412

1,690

The exercise price and fair value on grant date as of 31st March, 2013 reflect the five-for-one stock split on
1st April, 2007.
Fair value as of the grant date for stock options which were issued during the year ended 31st March, 2013
was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

Expected volatility*1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected remaining period*2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yield*3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate*4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
*1
*2
*3
*4

18th stock option plan

19th stock option plan

36.5%
5 years¥52 per share
0.175%

22.6%
1 year and 6 months¥52 per share
0.101%

Expected volatility is estimated based on the recent actual stock price in relation to the expected remaining
period for each plan.
As it is difficult to estimate the expected remaining period in a reasonable manner, it is determined to be theperiod from the grant date to the mid-point of the exercisable period.
Expected dividend yield is the expected annual dividend amount for the year ended 31st March, 2013 as ofthe date of the grant.
Risk-free interest rate represents the interest rate of governmental bonds whose remaining period
corresponds to the expected remaining period of stock options.
A-31

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
Because it is difficult to estimate the forfeited number of stock options for future periods, estimation of thevested number is based upon actual forfeitures in prior periods.
19. Segment Information
Segment Information
1)

Outline of reportable segments
The Company’s reportable segments, for which separate financial information is available, are evaluatedperiodically by management in deciding the allocation of management resources and in assessing businessperformances. The Company has classified its segments, comprehensively considering services, customers
and markets totally, and four segments have been determined as reportable segments.
Consulting
In addition to management consulting, which provides assistance for formulation and execution ofmanagement and business strategies, organizational reform etc., system consulting is provided for all
aspects of IT management.
Financial IT Solutions
Customers in the financial sector, who usually belong to the securities, insurance, or banking industries, areprovided with services including system consulting, system development and system management andoperation and IT solutions, such as multi-user systems.
Industrial IT Solutions
The main customers in this segment include not only the distribution, manufacturing and service sectors, butalso governments and other public agencies. The services provided include system consulting, systemdevelopment and system management and operation.
IT Platform Services
Services including system operation, management and administration of data centers and IT platform andnetwork architecture related services are provided to mainly the Financial IT Solutions segment andIndustrial IT Solutions segment. Customers in various sectors are provided with IT Platform solution andinformation security services.
This segment also conducts research for the development of new business operations and new products
related to IT solutions and research related to leading-edge information technologies.
The Company implemented an organizational change on 1st April, 2012.

2)

Methods of calculating net sales, profit (loss), assets and other items by reportable segment
The accounting policies for reportable segments are generally the same as described in “Significant
Accounting Policies.” Segment profit is based on operating profit. Intersegment sales or transfers are basedon current market prices.
A-32

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)3)

Net sales, profit (loss), assets and other items by reportable segment
Millions of yen
Year ended 31st March, 2011
Reportable segment
Financial Industrial
IT
IT
IT
Platform
Consulting Solutions Solutions Services Subtotal Others*1

Total

Net sales:
Sales to externalcustomers . . . . . . . ¥19,725 ¥194,939 ¥87,975 ¥15,365 ¥318,004 ¥ 8,320 ¥326,324
Intersegment sales ortransfers . . . . . . . .
53
66
4,784 63,187 68,090 3,096 71,186
Total . . . . . . . . .

19,778

195,005

92,759292 ¥ 36,010

Segment assets . . . . . . . . . ¥ 8,867 ¥ 98,207 ¥36,288 ¥52,666 ¥196,028 ¥ 5,642 ¥201,670
Other items:
Depreciation andamortization . . . . . ¥72 ¥ 15,958 ¥ 3,562 ¥ 8,615 ¥ 28,207 ¥ 480 ¥ 28,687
Increase in tangible
and intangible
fixed assets . . . . . .
81
7,990
3,981
7,404 19,456
307 19,763

*2

*3

¥

5

¥326,329(71,186)—(71,181)326,329

2,417¥ 38,427¥178,363¥380,033¥

1,979¥ 30,666

993

20,75678,552 386,094 11,416 397,510

Segment profit (loss) . . . . ¥ 1,218 ¥ 18,504 ¥ 6,344 ¥ 9,652 ¥ 35,718 ¥*1

Adjustment*2 Consolidated*3¥

Some subsidiaries provide system development and system management and operation services that are notincluded in the above reportable segments.
Descriptions of adjustments are as follows:(a) Individual items included in adjustment of segment profit were immaterial.
(b) The segment asset adjustment of ¥178,363 million is comprised of corporate assets not allocated to areportable segment of ¥179,974 million and the eliminations of intersegment receivables of¥(1,611) million.
(c) Individual items included in adjustment of depreciation and amortization were immaterial.
(d) Individual items included in adjustment of increase in tangible and intangible fixed assets wereimmaterial.
Segment profit is adjusted to operating profit in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
income.

A-33

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
Millions of yen
Year ended 31st March, 2012
Reportable segment
Financial Industrial
IT
IT
IT
Platform
Consulting Solutions Solutions Services Subtotal Others*1

Total

Adjustment*2 Consolidated*3

Net sales:
Sales to externalcustomers . . . . . . . . ¥21,686 ¥202,628 ¥89,343 ¥13,365 ¥327,022 ¥ 8,519 ¥335,541 ¥14Intersegment sales ortransfers . . . . . . . . .
122
91
5,320 66,007 71,540 3,283 74,823(74,823)
Total . . . . . . . . . .

21,808

202,719

94,663

79,372 398,562 11,802 410,364¥335,555—(74,809)335,555

1,889¥ 43,153

Segment assets . . . . . . . . . . ¥10,505 ¥101,371 ¥37,005 ¥63,522 ¥212,403 ¥ 5,894 ¥218,297 ¥184,487
Other items:
Depreciation andamortization . . . . . . ¥78 ¥ 16,331 ¥ 3,228 ¥ 9,229 ¥ 28,866 ¥ 364 ¥ 29,230 ¥ 1,645
Increase in tangible
and intangible fixed
assets . . . . . . . . . . .
94
19,5655,749 15,068 40,476
342 40,818
347¥402,784

Segment profit . . . . . . . . . . ¥ 3,011 ¥ 21,433 ¥ 6,575 ¥ 9,517 ¥ 40,536 ¥

*1
*2

*3

728 ¥ 41,264 ¥¥ 30,875

41,165

Some subsidiaries provide system development and system management and operation services that are notincluded in the above reportable segments.
Descriptions of adjustments are as follows:(a) Individual items included in adjustment of segment profit were immaterial.
(b) The segment asset adjustment of ¥184,487 million is comprised of corporate assets not allocated to areportable segment of ¥186,003 million and the eliminations of intersegment receivables of¥(1,516) million.
(c) Individual items included in adjustment of depreciation and amortization were immaterial.
(d) Individual items included in adjustment of increase in tangible and intangible fixed assets wereimmaterial.
Segment profit is adjusted to operating profit in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
income.

A-34

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
Millions of yen
Year ended 31st March, 2013
Reportable segment
Financial Industrial
IT
IT
IT
Platform
Consulting Solutions Solutions Services Subtotal Others*1

Total

Adjustment*2 Consolidated*3

Net sales:
Sales to externalcustomers . . . . . . . ¥22,761 ¥219,755 ¥83,615 ¥ 28,850 ¥354,981 ¥ 8,908 ¥363,889 ¥2Intersegment sales ortransfers . . . . . . . .
148
162
48
74,526 74,884 3,812 78,696(78,696)
Total . . . . . . . . .

22,909219,917

83,663103,376 429,865 12,720 442,585¥363,891—(78,694)363,891

1,211¥ 44,014

Segment assets . . . . . . . . . ¥11,436 ¥ 91,287 ¥34,788 ¥ 72,704 ¥210,215 ¥ 8,085 ¥218,300 ¥213,949
Other items:
Depreciation andamortization . . . . . ¥71 ¥ 27,952 ¥ 1,680 ¥ 11,138 ¥ 40,841 ¥ 383 ¥ 41,224 ¥ 1,251
Investment inaffiliates . . . . . . . .
—
9,582
—
—
9,582
282
9,864
—
Increase in tangible
and intangible
fixed assets . . . . . .
75
12,4693,150
14,211 29,905
723 30,628
420¥432,249

Segment profit . . . . . . . . . ¥ 2,808 ¥ 22,301 ¥ 6,487 ¥ 10,070 ¥ 41,666 ¥ 1,137 ¥ 42,803 ¥

*1
*2

*3

4)

¥ 42,475
9,864
31,048

Some subsidiaries provide system development and system management and operation services that are notincluded in the above reportable segments.
Descriptions of adjustments are as follows:(a) Individual items included in adjustment of segment profit were immaterial.
(b) The segment asset adjustment of ¥213,949 million is comprised of corporate assets not allocated to areportable segment of ¥215,672 million and the eliminations of intersegment receivables of¥(1,723) million.
(c) Individual items included in adjustment of depreciation and amortization were immaterial.
(d) Individual items included in adjustment of increase in tangible and intangible fixed assets wereimmaterial.
Segment profit is adjusted to operating profit in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
income.
Information about changes in reportable segments(a) In response to a revision of the Corporation Tax Law, the method of depreciation used by thereportable segments for tangible fixed assets acquired on or after 1st April, 2012 has been changed inaccordance with the provisions of the revised Corporation Tax Law. As a result of this change, total
segment profit for the year ended 31st March, 2013 increased by ¥348 million from the corresponding
amount which would have been recorded under the previous method. The impact on each segment isomitted because the amounts are immaterial.
(b) The Company partially changed its segment reporting structure as of 1st April, 2012. The information
security business and IT platform solution business, which had previously been included in the Industrial
IT Solutions segment, were newly included in the IT Platform Services segment.

A-35

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
Related information
1)

Information by products and services
Sales to external customers classified by products and services for the years ended 31st March, 2011, 2012
and 2013 is summarized as follows:
31st March, 2011
Millions of
YoYyen
ChangeConsulting services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
System development and application sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
System management and operation services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 32,967
117,076
166,580
9,706

14.1%
(7.7)
(0.3)
(39.0)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥326,329(3.6)%

31st March, 2012
Millions of
YoYyen
ChangeConsulting services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
System development and application sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
System management and operation services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 36,099
125,557
164,084
9,815

9.5%
7.2
(1.5)
1.1

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥335,555

2.8%

31st March, 2013
Millions of
YoYyen
Change2)

Consulting services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
System development and application sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
System management and operation services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥ 39,079
140,478
174,990
9,344

8.3%
11.9
6.6
(4.8)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

¥363,891

8.4%

Information by geographical area
Information by geographical area is omitted, because sales and tangible fixed assets in Japan constituted
more than 90% of total sales and tangible fixed assets for the years ended 31st March, 2012 and 2013.

A-36

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)
3)

Information by major customer
31st March, 2012
YoY
ChangeMillions ofyen

Percentage of
total sales

Nomura Holdings, Inc. . . . . . . . . .

¥ 89,474

26.7%

17.9% Financial IT Solutions

Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd. . . . .

39,998

11.9

0.9

*

Related segment

Industrial IT Solutions andFinancial IT Solutions

Sales to subsidiaries of major customers and sales to major customers through leasing companies
are included in the above table.
Millions ofyen

Percentage of
total sales

31st March, 2013
YoY
ChangeNomura Holdings, Inc. . . . . . . . . .

¥100,984

27.8%

12.9%

Financial IT Solutions

Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd. . . . .

44,98412.4

12.5

Industrial IT Solutions andFinancial IT Solutions*

Related segment

Sales to subsidiaries of major customers and sales to major customers through leasing companies
are included in the above table.

Information about impairment loss on fixed assets for each reportable segment
Years ended 31st March, 2012 and 2013
Not applicable.
Information about amortized amount of goodwill and unamortized balance of goodwill for each reportablesegment
Years ended 31st March, 2012
Not applicable.
Years ended 31st March, 2013
Information is omitted because the amount is immaterial.
Information about gains on bargain purchase for each reportable segment
Years ended 31st March, 2012
Not applicable.

A-37

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
31st March, 2011 (unaudited), 2012 and 2013 (unaudited)Years ended 31st March, 2013
In the Financial IT Solutions segment, the Company acquired additional shares of Daiko Clearing
Services during the year ended 31st March, 2013. As a result, Daiko Clearing Services is newly
accounted for by the equity method. A gain on bargain purchase of ¥4,661 million was recorded by theCompany as an extraordinary gain for the year ended 31st March, 2013 in relation to this transaction.
20. Subsequent Events
Not applicable.

A-38

SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has
duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
By: /s/ KOJI NAGAI
Name: Koji Nagai
Title: Group Chief Executive Officer
Date: June 27, 2013

INDEX OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit
NumberDescription

1.1

Articles of Incorporation of the registrant (English translation) (filed on June 30, 2011 as an
exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein byreference)
1.2
Share Handling Regulations of the registrant (English translation) (filed on April 7, 2010 as an
exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-165925) and incorporated
herein by reference)
1.3
Regulations of the Board of Directors of the registrant (English translation) (filed on June 30, 2011as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated hereinby reference)
1.4
Regulations of the Nomination Committee (English translation) (filed on June 30, 2009 as an
exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein byreference)
1.5
Regulations of the Audit Committee (English translation) (filed on June 30, 2009 as an exhibit to
the Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)
1.6
Regulations of the Compensation Committee (English translation) (filed on June 27, 2012 as an
exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein byreference)
2.1
Form of Deposit Agreement among the registrant, The Bank of New York Mellon as depositary
and all owners and holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts, including theform of American Depositary Receipt (filed on April 28, 2010 as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333-166346) and incorporated herein by reference)
4.1
Limitation of Liability Agreement (English translation) (filed on June 30, 2011 as an exhibit to theAnnual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)(1)4.2
Limitation of Liability Agreement (filed on June 30, 2011 as an exhibit to the Annual Report on
Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)(2)8.1
Subsidiaries of the registrant—See “Item 4.C. Information on the Company—Organizational
Structure.”
11.1
Code of Ethics of Nomura Group (English translation) (filed on June 27, 2012 as an exhibit to theAnnual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-15270) and incorporated herein by reference)
12.1
Certification of the principal executive officer required by 17 C.F.R. 240. 13a-14(a)12.2
Certification of the principal financial officer required by 17 C.F.R. 240. 13a-14(a)13.1
Certification of the chief executive officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
13.2
Certification of the chief financial officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
15.1
Consent of Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC with respect to its report on the audit of the financial
statements included in this annual report
15.2
Consent of Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC with respect to its report on the audit of the financial
statements included in this annual report
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase(1) The Company and each of Masahiro Sakane, Toshinori Kanemoto, Tsuguoki Fujinuma and Takao Kusakari
entered into a Limitation of Liability Agreement, substantially in the form of this exhibit.
(2) The Company and each of Dame Clara Furse and Michael Lim Choo San entered into a Limitation of
Liability Agreement substantially in the form of this exhibit.
The Company has not included as exhibits certain instruments with respect to our long-term debt. The
amount of debt authorized under each such debt instrument does not exceed 10% or our total assets. We will
furnish a copy of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.

Exhibit 12.1
Certification
I, Koji Nagai, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Nomura Holdings, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for thecompany and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 27, 2013
/s/ KOJI NAGAI
Koji Nagai
Group Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 12.2
Certification
I, Shigesuke Kashiwagi, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Nomura Holdings, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for thecompany and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 27, 2013/s/ SHIGESUKE KASHIWAGI
Shigesuke Kashiwagi
Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 13.1
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Nomura Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
March 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: June 27, 2013
/s/ KOJI NAGAI
Koji Nagai
Group Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 13.2
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Nomura Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
March 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: June 27, 2013/s/ SHIGESUKE KASHIWAGI
Shigesuke Kashiwagi
Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 15.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form F-3 No. 333-165049,
No. 333-169682 and No. 333-186755 and Form S-8 No. 333-134590, No. 333-141988, No. 333-150267,
No. 333-158344, No. 333-165925, No. 333-173244, No. 333-180506 and No. 333-187585) and related
Prospectus of Nomura Holdings, Inc. of our reports dated June 27, 2013, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Nomura Holdings, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingof Nomura Holdings, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended March 31, 2013.
/s/ Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC
Tokyo, Japan
June 27, 2013

Exhibit 15.2
Consent of Independent Auditors
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form F-3 No. 333-165049,
No. 333-169682 and No. 333-186755 and Form S-8 No. 333-134590, No. 333-141988, No. 333-150267,
No. 333-158344, No. 333-165925, No. 333-173244, No. 333-180506 and No. 333-187585) and related
Prospectus of Nomura Holdings, Inc. of our report dated June 27, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended
March 31, 2013.
/s/ Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC
Tokyo, Japan
June 27, 2013