Journal of Global Resources
Volume 6 (01)August 2019-January 2020
Page 110-117
UGC–CARE Listed Journal in Group D
ISSN: 2395-3160 (Print), 2455-2445 (Online)

17
SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF RURAL GROWTH CENTRES IN SAGAR DISTRICT, MADHYAPRADESH
Pawan Kumar Sharma
Assistant Professor, Department of General & Applied Geography
Dr. Hari Singh Gour University (A Central University), Sagar (M.P.), India
Email: pawansharmageo@gmail.com
Abstract: This paper aims to analyse the spatial pattern of rural growth centres in Sagar district
with the help of nearest neighbour analysis. Rural growth centre is acts as a service centre,
which has a potential for further development, and it provides services, goods and facilities for
its own population and its surrounding area, which fulfilling their required needs and basic
amenities for better livelihood. It conceived as a point of attraction for the people who otherwise
would go to large congested urban areas. The present study is an attempt to find out thehierarchical order of settlements as rural growth centres, rural growth point, service centre andrural centres in the Sagar district. To find out this hierarchy, the composite score method has
been applied for 40 selected socio-economic amenities. This study is based on secondary data,
which are mainly collected from District census handbook 2011of Sagar district. The Social
Amenity index is used to calculate weightage value of each facility. The nearest neighbour
analysis method is used to found Rn value and deciding the spatial distribution pattern of rural
growth centres in the study area. Total 38 Rural Growth centres are identified in the study
region. As per the nearest neighbour analysis the Rn value is 0.151, which shows that the
RGC’s are distributed in clustered pattern. The result reflects there is wide spread disparities inthe block wise distribution of rural growth centres. So, there is an urgent need to propose some
new Growth centres in the unserved gap areas to provide socio-economic activities to all the
local people. It will be definitely slowdowns the migration from their surrounding habitat to larger
urban areas, because rural centre work as a point of attraction of services. This idea of centre
places is based on selectivity on the one hand and decentralization of social amenities on theother. Therefore an overall development of all villages within the region can be ensured in an
integrated way at minimum cost in terms of money, time and effort.
Key words: Socio-Economic Amenity Index, Nearest Neighbour Analysis, Clustered Pattern
Introduction
In recent years, greater emphasis has come to be laid on grass-root approach to planning anda number of area development programmes were launched to meet this end. This research has
an aim to achieve optimum results of rural development of Sagar district by a balanced
distribution of highly necessary facilities. The core aspect of the study of rural central places is
the identification of centres of different orders, which may provide an efficient way of articulating
the development activities in different parts of the region. In the rural areas due to the scattered
distribution pattern and small sized settlements, it is impracticable to provide all the functions inevery settlement. It is, therefore, advisable to select centres, keeping in view the least travel
distance and maximum population to serve, for locating the various functional institutions.
These centres, which are of different orders, will act as nucleus for providing some basic
packages of services to their hinterland according to their respective hierarchical orders. They
may be arranged in to a spatial system for smooth transmission of various development
activities throughout the region in such a way, as the friction of distance, the main constraint of
exposure is minimized. They will much effective in eliminating the spatial lag of socio-economic
growth in different parts.
The goals of rural development entail adequate concentration to various economic,
social and political factors that influence the rural society through a complex network ofinterrelationship, where growth centre can be an eligible potential feature. The growth centres
performs as centre of economic, social and cultural activities in the rural areas. A rural growthcentre can be compared with Central Business District (CBD) of the arena. These are the110venues where people at least fulfil their basic needs related to agricultural, educational, medical
and marketing services. In India, nearly seventy percent of the total population of the country
lives in rural areas that are facing the problems of lack of essential amenities for their livelihood.
It is essential to insure the availability of basic necessities at minimum distance in least timeframe. The importance of central place depends upon the central functions performed and thesize of the population served by it. On the basis of functions and the size of the population
served central places can be categorized into high order central places and low order central
places. High order central places have large size of population served by it with greater
functional specialization, whereas low order central places have small size of population servedwith smaller range of goods and services.
Literature Review
Rural growth centre is found as a growing spot of service delivery in the rural area and to
bridge the gap between rural economy and regional economy, attention should be given
regionally for growth centre development for the changing the rural people’s livelihood style andsustainable development of the catchment area of the growth centre. The concept of microregional planning suggests a framework for decentralizing economic and social activities by
locating specific functions in appropriate places. The central place is the most important aspectof the Christaller’s theory. It is the centre of a region which provides one or more services to anarea larger than itself. The services may be extensive or limited, but the service function iscommon to all central places. The criteria based on an assessment of the business andservices for deciding the hierarchy of settlements was mainly used by Webb (1959),
Dickinson(1964), Parkes (1969), Clout (1972) and Carter (1972). Guttman's Scalogramme
technique (Parkes, 1969) is more applicable in Indian context because in India number or
isolation is found in physical landscape. In India also, a number of geographers like, L.K. Sen(1971), L.S. Bhatt (1972), R. C. Sharma (1972), A.B. Mukerjee (1974), J. Singh (1979),
Sundaram (1980), C. R. Kothari (2001), R. P. Mishra (2002), R. N. Mishra and P.K. Sharma(2004) have identified growth centres and their hierarchy by measuring the centrality in different
ways. R.P. Mishra has applied centrality score method to suggest a five-tier hierarchy of growthfoci as Growth Pole, Growth Centres, Growth Point, Service Centre and Central Village. R. N.
Mishra and P.K. Sharma (2004) have applied a Final Centrality Score by adding Functional
Index value of Webb and Social Amenity Index value by L.S. Bhatt for identification ofhierarchical arrangement of the settlements. In the present study, the whole settlements of the
district are classified into four tier hierarchical order. A rural growth centre is a village, which
provides one or more services for the population living around it. V.L.S. Prakasa Rao explained
the concept of central place as the crystallization of mass around a nucleus, which may be atown and is the focal point for its surrounding area. Sharma, P.K. (2018), focused on this studyof rural development scenario and strategies in Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh.
Sharma, P.K. & Sharma, S.C. (2016), studied or analysed the rural central places is a newperspective for micro-level development planning.
Study Area
Sagar District is a district of Madhya Pradesh state in central India. It is situated between 23◦10’
to 24◦27’ north latitude and 78◦4’ to 79◦21’ east longitude. Sagar district is a sixteenth largest
district in size in the state, and third largest in the Jabalpur revenue division. As of the census
2011, Sagar District had a population of 23, 78, and 458 persons of which male and female
were 12, 56, 257 and 11, 22, 201 respectively. The average literacy rate is 76.46 percent in2011 compared to 67.73 percent of 2001. The major share of the population is belongs to
Rajgonds tribes. The district has 2075 in-habitated villages as per the census 2011.
Objective
The present research aims to study about the rural growth centres of Sagar district with thehelp of nearest neighbour analysis. The major objectives of the study are:
1. To analyse the salient features of rural development in its geographical frame.
2. To identify the Rural Growth Centres in the study area.
3. Nearest Neighbour Analysis to investigate the block wise spatial pattern of rural
growth centres.
4. To formulate the plan for the balance development of the region.

111

Database and Methodology
The study is related to rural central places, so primary data have been collected at the village
level and secondary level data have been collected for resources and infrastructuredevelopment from various departments. The statistical as well as empirical methodologies areused to obtain the aim of this study. The study followed personal interview, Focus group
discussion and key informant interview for collection of information and secondary data from
Census of India (2011) and statistical handbook of Madhya Pradesh, reference books, journals
and various documents. As per the methodological aspect this study have two phases, at thefirst stage rural growth centres are identified by using social amenity index method whereas insecond stage the spatial arrangement of these centres are analysed through Nearest
Neighbour matrix. In this study 40 functions found in the total settlements of the study area
have been taken into consideration.
Therefore, this method is based on two factors like Number of different functions offered
by a settlement (quantity) and the Level of various functions available in a settlement (quality).
(a) Social Amenity Indies (SAI) – It is based on central facilities found in the settlement
like education, medical, marketing, postal etc. For finding SAI we have to find out
weightage for each facility.
To find out weightage following formula has been used: W = N/F
Where; W = Weightage of each facility. N = Total number of settlement in the study
area. F = Number of settlement having that particular facility.
The weightage value has been calculated for all the amenities. According amenities arearranged in an order as in ascending order.
Table 01: Facilities with their Weightage Value#

Name of Facility

Weightage
Value
1.26
2.77
16.08
23.57
94.31

#

Name of Facility

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Primary School
Middle School
Secondary School
Senior Secondary School
Primary Health Centre (PHC)

21
22
23
24
25

Primary health sub centre(PHS)
Maternity and child welfare
centre (MCW)
Dispensary (D)Veterinary hospital (VH)

14.02

26

148.21

27

51.87
79.8

28
29

10. Family welfare centre (FWC)
11. Tap Water
12. Well Water

86.45
5.76
1.14

30
31
32

13. Hand Pump
14. Tube Well / Bore Well
15. River / Canal
16. Tank/Pond/ Lake

1.12
3.32
3.49
4.96

33
34
35
36

17. Post Office (PO)18. Sub-Post Office (SPO)

18.2
15.6

37
38

19. Post & Telegraph office(P&TO)
20. Telephones (Land Lines)

29.64

39

7.43

40

Mobile Phone Coverage
Bus Service (Public & Private)
Railway Station
Sea/ River Ferry Service
Connected to National Highway(NH)
Connected to State Highway(SH)
Connected to major district road
(MDR)
Pucca roads
Commercial & Co-operative
Banks
Agricultural Credit Societies
Self-Help Group (SHG)
Public distribution system (PDS)
shop
Mandis / Regular Market
Weekly Haat
Agricultural Marketing Society
Integrated Child Development
SchemeAnganwadi Centre
ED- Power Supply for Domestic
Use
EAG- Power supply for
agricultural use
EA- Power Supply for ALL uses

6.
7.
8.
9.

Weightage
Value
1.38
3.48
56.08
32.42
18.36
12.88
6.17
2.4
41.5
12.2
2.02
3.26
74.1
25.93
44.14
7.6
1.56
1.14
1.15
1.44

Total 40 basic facilities have been taken into consideration to calculate the weightage
score for the each settlement. These facilities are generally related with basic amenities of any
area, such as - education, health, drinking water, market, electricity, agriculture, transport,
communications and some of the essential government services etc. Weightage value ismeasured for each facility of every village. After then final composite score is calculated foreach centre.
112

On the basis of final centrality score all the settlements of the study region has beenclassified into four categories as Rural growth centres, Rural growth points, Rural service
centres and central Village which are show in the table 2.
Table 02: Hierarchical Order of Rural Growth Centres of Sagar District
#
1.
2.
3.
4.

Hierarchical Order
Rural Growth Centre (RGC)
Rural Growth Point (RGP)
Rural Service Centre (RSC)
Central Village (CV)Social Amenity Index
Above 6.00
3.00-6.00
1.00-3.00
Below 1.00

No. of Villages
38
89
412
1536

Total 38 Rural Growth centres are found in Sagar district, having the social amenity
index score above or up to 6.00. The villages having the index values between 3.00 to 6.00 are
consider as rural growth points. The total 89 villages are under the category of rural growth
points. Rural service points are 412 (based on scale value 1.00-3.00) and remaining centres
are called as Central villages (1536) which are in the range of 1.00 or below 1.00 according toSocial Amenity index value.
Table 03: Block wise distribution of Rural Growth Centres in Sagar District
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Block
Bina
KhuraiMalthonBanda
Shahgarh
Rahatgarh
Jaisinagar
Sagar
Rehli
Kesli
Deori

RGC
2
3
6
0
6
4
4
4
1
4
4

RGP
7
6
4
10
6
12
2
14
15
7
7

RSC
36
30
27
38
28
51
39
43
40
33
47

CV
132
148
156
131
88
144
104
101
189
145
197

*RGC= Rural Growth Centres RGP= Rural Growth Points Rsc= Rural Service Points CV= Central Villages

As per the hierarchical order there are total 38 Rural growth centres in 11 blocks of the
Sagar district, with 6 RGC’s Malthon and Shahgarh blocks have highest number of rural
growth centres in comparison to other block of the Sagar district. After these Sagar, Rahatgarh,
Jaisinagar, Kesli and Deori blocks having 4 RGC’s, Khurai block has 3 RGC’s and Bina block
having 2 centres whereas the Rehli block have only one such centre and Banda block is
without of any rural growth centre. These values are given in table 4.
Nearest Neighbour Analysis
Nearest neighbour analysis (NNA) is applied for finding the spatial distribution of rural growthcentres in the district. The evolution of spatial pattern is the result or diverse geographicalsetting. Hence, they have varying patterns of spatial distribution in different geographicalregion. The settlement patterns on the earth surface consequent upon the geographical setting,rare found in uniform pattern. NNA method is firstly introduced by P. Hertz in 1909, but its
systematic use was done by Clark & Evans (1954) in context of two-dimensional measurementof the phenomena distributed over the surface of earth. They used this method to measure
distribution of different plants in different regions. Nearest Neighbour Analysis measures the
distribution of something over a geographical space. It provides a numerical value that
describes the extent to which a set of points are clustered or uniformly spaced. Nearest
neighbour analysis examines the distances between each point and the closest point to it, andthen compress there to expected values for a random sample of a points from a complete
spatial randomness (CSR) pattern. This expresses distinction of spatial patterns of points in ascientific and numerical form. It distinguished spatial pattern as -Uniform, Random andClustered.

113

Table 04: Rural Growth Centres in Sagar District(Based on Final Composite Score above FCS 6)
Block

#

Bina

1
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4

KhuraiMalthonShahgarh

Rahatgarh

Jaisinagar

Sagar

Rehli
Kesli

Deori

Rural GrowthCentres
Bhangarh
AgasodKhimlasaBasahari
BardhaMalthonBandriKaroli
Barodiya Kalan
Rajwans
Pithoriya
Rouda
Barayatha
Dalpatpur
Khatora Kalan
HirapurNarwanAmarmaoh
Narayawali
SihoraMudra Jaruwakheda

Jhila
Jaisinagar
BilehraChartoriya
Bakswaha
Surkhi
SanodhaParsoriya
Kerbana
Chhirari
Kesali
Tada
Sahajpur
Keolari
Mahrajpur
Gaurjhamer
MardhiJamuniya
JhunkuArea(Sq. Hectare)1161.7
1985.6
1149.83797.21402.9777.8
1208
2014.4
978848.6
1354.5
994.2
735.9
903.4
125.9
2589.81515.51179.91497
1072.61801.81083.1
1920.6637.8
1127.32079
1952.8538.91062.21231.8
493.5
694.8
234.6
436.2
696.9
578.2
574.5
217.1

Total
Population
3516
4495
10333
7138
2593
10764
10802
6836
2830
3678
2328
4976
5096
2944
17
7355
5550
5261
5355
6521
3760
7848
9371
1680
1553
7289
6394
4398
4121
4336
8565
2682
529
1001
4946
9746
3006
2974

Final Composite
Score
9.38
7.24
16.49
6.61
6.09
23.57
17.34
10.60
10.23
6.94
6.37
14.51
11.40
8.60
8.35
7.03
6.19
18.26
17.26
13.72
6.97
14.89
12.65
7.45
6.72
17.72
13.74
9.24
7.54
9.72
21.38
14.75
7.78
7.10
17.15
13.59
8.53
6.78

Nearest Neighbour Index
It measures the distribution of any spatial pattern or points from randomness assuming the
distribution of points on random. It is also known as an index of randomness.
It represents the ratio between the mean observed distance or points and the mean expecteddistance in random situation.
Do
___
Rn =

De
Where; Do = Observed distance shows the average distance between all points or
all places whereas Expected distance
De = shows the intensity of all patterns/ sample.
NNA is helps to determine the spatial pattern and intensity of variables of service centre or
growth centre. In geography analysis, first of all this method was used by Dacey to study the
distribution of settlement pattern.
R = ro /reWhere; R= Nearest Neighbour Constantro= Average Observed Distancere= Average Expected Distancero= ∑d/ N114

d= distance between any settlement and their nearest settlement (where direction is not
focused)∑d= summation of nearest distance of various settlement.
N= total no. of all settlement
re = 1/ 2√N/A
A= total area of study region
The value of ‘R’ is always comes between 0.00 to 3.00. On the basis of these values’ tendency
of distribution of settlement pattern will be defined. The final value put in the Scale formeasuring distribution pattern of settlements (Rn scale)
Table 05: Rn Scale
Rn value
0.00-0.09
0.10-0.50
0.51-0.99
1.00-1.19
1.20-1.49
1.50-2.14
2.15
2.15 & above

Spatial PatternComplete concentration
High concentration
Clustered pattern
Random pattern
Approaching uniform
Dispersed pattern
Hexagonal patternHigh dispersed pattern

Value of r also compared with other statistical method. In this variance, Index (V) is important.
V = (4-π)/ 4dπ
Where;
π= 22/7 or 3.1416
d = N/A = no. of settlement / total area of study region
Complete the Analysis of V value is with the expected distance (re) which is like that–
If re >v, (uniform distribution)
V>re, (clustered pattern)
Re = v or re/ v = 1, then always be (random pattern)
Uses- This method is very useful to show the spatial pattern of the settlements.
It also used to show the settlement distribution based on different population groups.
In any area distribution of multiple facilities also measures by used this method. Its outcome is
to make planning for distribution of equal facility according their needs. So, it plays importantrole to making plans of equal distribution of facilities in any area.
Table 06: Distance between Rural Growth Centres#

Rural GrowthCentres

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Bhangarh
AgasodKhimlasaBasahari
BardhaMalthonBandriKaroli
Barodiya
Rajwans
Pithoriya
Rouda
Barayatha
Dalpatpur
KhatoraHirapurNarwanAmarmaoh
Narayawali
SihoraNearestGrowthCentre
1-2
2-4
3-4
4-5
5-4
6-8
7-10
8-9
9-8
10-7
11-9
12-14
13-14
14-13
15-16
16-17
17-15
18-19
19-18

Distance(in cm.)#Rural
Growth Centres

1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.6
0.7
0.7
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.3
1.3

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38

Jaruwakheda
Jhila
Jaisinagar
BilehraChartoriya
Bakswaha
Surkhi
SanodhaParsoriya
Kerbana
Chhirari
Kesali
Tada
Sahajpur
Keolari
Mahrajpur
Gaurjhamer
MardhiJamuniya
Jhunku115

NearestGrowthCentre
20-18
21-20
22-24
23-25
24-23
25-23
26-23
27-29
28-27
29-27
30-37
31-32
32-31
33-31
34-24
35-38
36-37
37-36
38-36

Distance(in cm.)
1.3
2.2
1.6
0.5
0.6
0.5
1.2
0.7
1.3
0.7
2.2
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.1
1.7
0.7
0.7
1.6

Formula to finding the nearest neighbour analysis- Rn = Do / De
Where, Rn = the index of Randomness
Do= the mean observed distance
Where; Do= ∑d/ N = d1+ d2+d3+_ _ _ _ _dn / N
Do= ∑d/ N = 169.2/ 38 = 4.452
De = the mean expected distance
Where; De = 1 / 2√N/A = 1/2√38/10,252 = 1/ 0.034 = 29.411
De = 29.411
Rn = Do / De = 4.452/ 29.411 = 0.151
Rn Score = 0.151
Total distance = 42.3 cm= 42.3 ×4 = 169.2 km2
Total area = 10,252 km2Result and Discussion
In the present research, all the settlements of the study region are categorised in a hierarchy
manner as rural growth centres, rural growth point, service centre and central village. On thebasis of the final composite score of 40 basic socio-economic amenities total 38 villages are
considered as rural growth centres in 11 blocks as they score the index value more than 6.00.
The Social Amenity index is used to calculate weightage value of each facility. The nearest
neighbour analysis method is used to find Rn value and deciding the spatial distribution patternof rural growth centres in the study area. The result reflects block wise distribution of rural
growth centre in Sagar district. As per the nearest neighbour analysis the Rn value is 0.151,
which shows that the RGC’s are distributed in clustered pattern. Overall the distribution is quitesatisfactory in reference to the whole district but some of the area having not a single growthcentres to serve the local population. Few areas are having sufficient rural growth centres as
their population requirements are Malthon, Shahgarh, Sagar, Rahatgarh, Jaisinagar, Kesli, andDeori. Whereas some areas are having a few numbers of rural growth centres in Sagar district
such as Khurai, Bina, Rehli, and Banda block is only block which is not having any rural growthcentre. This kind of distribution of RGC’s in the area is one of the reasons of spatial imbalancein the level of development among the Blocks of a district. The main strategy of rural growthcentre approach is to reduce micro regional imbalance between rural and urban areas and toprovide the minimum basic facilities to the each centre.
Conclusion
It is clear that the spatial arrangement of rural growth centres is an important tool through which
the quality of life in human settlement can fairly be improved because such a system provides
various facilities within easy reach of the people, in a lesser time and at least distance. Rural
growth centre is a centre, which provides the facilities, services and goods to its own population
as well as surrounding population for creating balance in socio-economic development in anarea. In the present study the result shows that the maximum concentration of the facilities arefound in the big size villages or in the urban centres whereas small village are lagging behind. It
is recommended that the policy maker should ensure before the plan formation that at leastaccessibility basic amenities for the all local people at minimum distance with least cost for theirrespectable livelihood. This research suggests that there is an urgent need of establish somenew rural growth centres in backward rural areas to fulfil their basic socio-economic
requirements. Finally it is concluded with the fact that the development plans can better servethrough rural transformation and their resourceful functioning at village level.
Acknowledgement: ICSSR for providing fund for the research under Major Research Project.
References
1. Agarwala, A.K. and Hazarika, P.L. (2002) Regional Disparities in Economic Developmentof Assam: A District level Study, Indian, Journal of Regional Science, Vol.34, No. 2, pp.121
2. Arora, R.C. (1979) Integrated Rural Development, S. Chand and Co. Ltd., New Delhi.
3. Bhatt, L.S. (1972) Micro level Planning, K.B. Publication, New Delhi. Pp.25-39
4. Census of India, (2011) District Census Handbook, Sagar, Directorate of Census
Operation, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal. 10-27
116

5. Chand, M. and Puri, V.K. (1983) Regional planning in India, Allied publishers, New Delhi.
6. Christaller, W., ‘Central Places in Southern Germany’, translated by C.W. Baskins, London,
Prentice-Hall, 1933.
7. District Statistical Outline (2013) District Sagar, Directorate of Economics and Statistic,
Govt. of M.P., Sagar. Pp. 23-45
8. Mandal, R.B. (1979) Introduction to Rural Settlements, Concept Publication Company, New
Delhi. pp. 46-51
9. Mishra, R.N. & Sharma, P. K. (2003) Study of Rural Growth Centres for in Jaisalmer district,
Journal ANNALS, Vol. XXIII, NAGI. New Delhi
10. Mishra, R.N. & Sharma, P. K. (2007) Rural Growth Centres for Micro-level planning, Ritu
Publication, Jaipur. Rajasthan. pp. 16-25
11. Mitra, A (1961) Levels of Regional Development in Census of India, Govt. of India, New
Delhi, vol. 1 Part 1
12. Mondal, B.K. & Das, K., (2010) Role of growth centre: A rural development perspective,
journal of Bangladesh Institute of Planners, vol. 3, December 2010, p.p.129-141.
13. Pal, M.N. (1975) Regional Disparities in The Level Of Development In India, Indian Journal
Of Regional Science, Vol.7. pp.34-39
14. Sethy, V. (2016) Regional Disparities in India: Top Eight Indicators, Sage Publication.
Pp.79-83
15. Shand, R and S. Bhide (2000) Sources of Economic Growth- Regional Dimensions ofReforms, Economic and Political Weekly, October 14, pp. 3747-3757.
16. Sharma, P.K. & Sharma, S.C. (2016) ‘Study of rural central places for micro-regional
planning in Bikaner district’ Annals of the RGA, vol. XXXIII.
17. Sharma, P.K. (2015) Regional Disparities in Socio-Economic Development in Jaisalmer
District, Rajasthan, The Deccan Geographer. Vol. 53 (1), pp. 23-28.
18. Sharma, P.K., (2018) Rural development scenario and strategies in Bundelkhand Region of
Madhya Pradesh, India, American journal of Rural Development, 2018, vol.6, No.3, 104108.
19. Singh, R. (2006) Regional Disparities in level of socio-economic Development in post
Reforms Period: A District level Analysis, Annals of NAGI, Vol. 26, Dec., No.2, pp.8794.the International Trade.” Journal of Economic Geography
20. Tiwari, R.C. (1997) Settlements Geography, Prayag Pustak Bhawan, Allahabad. 56-92
21. www.acadiemia.edu
22. www.sodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream
23. www.vpic.info/publication/reports/implmentation/growth.pdf
24. www.yourarticlelibrary.com/geography/growth117