JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the projectIntroduction of High Efficiency Electrolyzer in
Chlor-Alkali Production Plant

Reference number

SA001

Third-party entity (TPE)(TPE-SA-001) Japan Quality Assurance
Organization

Project participant contracting the TPE

Kanematsu Corporation

Date of completion of this report

20/03/2018

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or
CLremaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed using
document form
the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to the typeof project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology andapproved JCM that the applied version is valid at the time of submission of
methodology
the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
Emission
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in thesourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposedemission
JCM project.
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante
listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental impact
impactassessment, if required by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, inassessment
line with Saudi Arabian procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
1JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Name

Company

Schemecompetence*

Function*Mr.
Koichiro
Team
JQA
Ms.
TanabeLeaderMr.
Irhan
External
Team
Ms.
Febijanto individual
MemberMr.
Tadashi
External
Internal
Ms.
Yoshidaindividual
Reviewer
Please specify the following for each item.

Technical
competence*

Onsitevisit

Authorized
Authorized
Authorized* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader, teammember, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
A series of the JCM approved forms, including Project Design Document(hereinafter referred to as “PDD”) form, was checked and confirmed as complete
against the JCM Guidelines for developing Project Design Document and Monitoring
Report,

JCM_SA_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0(hereinafterreferred

to

as

“JCM

Guidelines”).
A valid form of the JCM PDD of JCM_SA_F_PDD_ver02.0 is used for the PDD
version 01.0 dated 19/12/2017 (as the first edition) and for the PDD version 02.0 dated
05/03/2018 (as the second edition). The validation was conducted on the first edition
and the result was reflected on the second edition of PDD appropriately.
<Findings>
No issues were identified to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team confirms that the PDD is completed using the valid form of
the JCM PDD form and drafted in accordance with the JCM Guidelines for developing
PDD.
3

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

C.2. Project description<Means of validation>
The purpose of the proposed JCM project is to reduce CO2 emission emitted by
the regional grid system through a replacement of four units of the existing elementsof ion exchange membrane (hereinafter referred to as “IEM”) brine electrolyzer withthe latest model. The latest model has a more optimum performance design, inparticular, optimization of elements’ inner structures and electrode shape, reduction ofresistance (lowering the voltage) of various components, and prevention of themechanical damage for IEM, Thus, these performances achieve lower power
consumption and contribute to energy saving.
The proposed JCM project is implemented by Jubail Chemical Industries
Company (hereinafter referred to as “JANA”) from Kingdom of Saudi Arabia andKanematsu Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Kanematsu”) from Japan. The
High efficiency electrolyzer (type: nx-BiTAC868) is installed by Kanematsu in thefactory of JANA, which is located in Jubail Industrial City-31961, Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia. The total production capacity of four units of the electrolyzers newly installed
is 50,000 ton-NaOH/year. The latest model of IEM can be operated stably at a lower
voltage, and thus it can reduce its electricity consumption by about 7%. The annual
emission reductions of 3,289 tCO2 is expected through the installation of the IEM brineelectrolyzer, and the emission reduction achieved for 5 years (2017-2022) is 16,445 tCO2 totally.
The validation team conducted one-day on-site assessment for this proposed
JCM project on 23/01/2018, after its document review, and had a follow-up interview
with the project participants. The location information of the proposed JCM project andthe other description stated in Section A (Project description) of the PDD were crosschecked through the physical inspection. As for the duration of the proposed JCM
project, it is confirmed that the starting date of project operation is 25/01/2017, whichis the starting date of monitoring activities for data collection. The expected operational
lifetime of the proposed JCM project is five years, which is determined based on the
durable year list stipulated in the Regulation of the Japanese Finance Ministry
No.15/1965 concerning the equipment lifetime.
The proposed JCM Project was partially supported by the Ministry ofEnvironment, Japan through the financing programme for JCM model projects, which
provided financial support of less than half of the initial investment for the projects inorder to facilitate GHG emission reduction project in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and toacquire JCM credits. Regarding the technology transfer, the electrolyzer manufacturer
4

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0(Thyssenkrupp Uhde Chlorine Engineers (Japan) Ltd.) conducted operation andmaintenance trainings for the installation of the electrolyzer, which were held on
20/12/2016 and 21/12/2016, and JANA's employees participated in the training
opportunities.
The validation team assessed the first version of PDD and the supporting
documents to validate that the proposed JCM project was in accordance with the JCM
requirements. The team also conducted the on-site assessment to confirm theaccuracy and completeness of the project description through interview with project
participants. The details of the persons interviewed, and documents reviewed areprovided in the Section E of this report.
<Findings>
No issues were identified to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
It is confirmed that the project description of the PDD is reasonable andappropriate.
C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
The project applied the approved methodology of JCM_SA_AM001_ver01.0"Introduction of High Efficiency Electrolyzer in Chlor-Alkali Production Plant". The
methodology is approved by the Joint Committee on 18/10/2017 and valid at the timeof the validation.
The validation team assessed that the selected methodology was applicable tothe proposed JCM project. The applicability of the proposed JCM project was checkedagainst two eligibility criteria stipulated in the approved methodology. The steps taken
for validating it and the conclusion are summarized as below.
Criterion 1: Project electrolyzer employs an ion-exchange membrane technology inelectrolyzers in the manufacturing process of chlor-alkali and the electrolyzer is the bipolar
type.
Project information in the PDD: The project installs the bipolar type ion exchange membrane(IEM) brine electrolyzers system in chlorine and caustic soda production process in Jubail
Industrial City.
Assessment and conclusion: It is confirmed through review of the relevant documents
5

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

provided by Kanematsu and interview with the PPs during the on-site assessment thatthe installed membranes are F-8080 type IEM and the installed electrolyzer is amodern bipolar type of nx-BITAC. The installation of these types of IEM andelectrolyzer meets the criterion 1. Therefore, the validation team concludes that theCriterion 1 is satisfied.

Criterion 2: Specific electricity consumption (SEC) for project electrolyzer i under the standard
conditions, 32% NaOH and 90 degrees Celsius is less than threshold SEC values set in thetable below under the standard conditions, 32% NaOH and 90 degrees Celsius;
CD (Current density) [kA/m2]

Threshold SEC value of the electrolyzer[kWh(DC)/t-NaOH]

4.0 ≦ CD ＜ 4.5

2,045

4.5 ≦ CD ＜ 5.02,088

5.0 ≦ CD ＜ 5.52,131

5.5 ≦ CD ＜ 6.02,174

6.0 ≦ CD ＜ 6.5

2,217

Project information in the PDD: The project SEC derived from the specification of the projectelectrolyzer is 1990 [kWh(DC)/t-NaOH] when CD is between 4.5 and 5.0 and is less than thethreshold SEC value of 2,088 [kWh(DC)/t-NaOH].

Assessment and conclusion: It is confirmed through review of the Performance
Guarantee Acceptance Certificate of the Electrolyzer (nx-BiTAC868) provided byKanematsu and the comprehensive interview with PPs during the on-site assessmentthat average of current density of the electrolyzers is 4.89 [kA/m2] having a range ofCD (Current Density) with 4.5 [kA/m2] ≼ CD <5 [kA/m2] and DC power consumption of
the electrolyzer is 1,990 [kWh(DC)/t-NaOH]. The value is lower than the threshold SEC
value of 2,088 [kWh(DC)/t-NaOH]. Therefore, the validation team concludes that theCriterion 2 is satisfied.
<Findings>
No issues were identified to the requirement.
6

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team confirms that the project applies the valid version of theapproved methodology and the applicability is demonstrated to the eligibility criteria ofthe methodology as appropriate.
C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>
The proposed project aims to reduce electricity consumption of electrolyzers by
replacing the existing element of ion exchange membrane brine electrolyzer with thelatest model. The replacement is proposed by Kanematsu using the technology
provided by Thyssenkrupp Uhde Chlorine Engineers (Japan) Ltd. A reduction ofelectricity consumption of the electrolyzers contributes to reduce GHG emissions
emitted from the regional grid system.
Reference Emission during the period p (REp) is calculated ex-ante by multiplying
the electricity consumption of references electrolyzer i, during the period p (ECRE,I,p,)by CO2 emission factor for consumed electricity (EFelec). The calculation equation is as
below.
The CO2 emission factor for grid electricity (EFelec) is 0.654 tCO2/MWh adopted
from the most recent value of the combined margin emission factor, which is publishedby Clean Development Mechanism - Designated National Authority, Ministry ofPetroleum and Mineral Resources, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This emission factor(0.654 tCO2/MWh) is cross-checked by the List of Grid Emission Factors issued by
IGES.

𝑅𝐸 =

𝐸𝐶

,,

× 𝐸𝐹

……………………….(1)

Where,REp: Reference Emission during the period p

ECRE,I,p : Electricity consumption of references electrolyzer i, during theperiod, pEFelec.

: CO2 emission factor for consumed electricity,

The ECRE,I,p is obtained by multiplying electricity consumption of the projectelectrolyzer (ECPJ,i,p) by the ratio of Specific electricity consumption of the referenceelectrolyzer (SECRE,i,p) and Specific electricity consumption of the project electrolyzer(SECPJ,i).

Thus, the equation (1) can be written as equation (2).
7

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

𝐸𝐶

, ,

=

,,

𝐸𝐶 , ×,× 𝐸𝐹……………….(2)Where,
ECPJ,i,p: Electricity consumption of the project electrolyzer

SECRE,i,p : Specific electricity consumption of the reference electrolyzer,
SECPJ,i: Specific electricity consumption of the project electrolyzer

The threshold value of SECRE,i,p for current density between 4.5 [kA/m2] ≼ CD <5[kA/m2] is 2,088 [kWh/t-NaOH]. The electrolyzers in the proposed JCM project havethe average of current density of 4.89 [kA/m2]. The value of SECPJ,i is determined by
the manufacturer guarantee value.
Project emissions during the period p (PEp) is calculated by equation (3).
𝑃𝐸 =𝐸𝐶 , ,× 𝐸𝐹……………………….(3)Where:
ECPJ,i,p : Electricity consumption of the project electrolyzer i, during the period p
ECPJ,i,p is calculated by multiplying the rated power consumption of electrolyzer
by the total capacity of them. The rated power consumption of electrolyzer is estimatedbased on the previous data provided by the manufacturer.
The emission reductions (ERp) is calculated by equation (4).
ERp = REp - PEp……………………………………..(4)The total emission reduction for 5 years operation during 25/01/2017 until
24/01/2022 is 16,445 tCO2e.
It is confirmed through the review of the relevant documents and the on-site
assessment that all CO2 emission source specified by the applied methodology are
identified, and the reference emissions, project emissions and emission reductions in
the PDD and Monitoring Plan Sheet are correctly calculated, in accordance with themethodology JCM_SA_AM001_ver01.0. It is also confirmed through interview with PP
that there is no backup power generation system, therefore there is no fossil fuel used
for generating electricity in this plant. In Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the supply of thegrid electricity is stable and hence, there is no power outage or instability of electricity
supply during a year.
8JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

In the Monitoring Plan Sheet, the cells for the parameters of FCPJ,p, EGp, EFelec,
, NCVfuel and EFfuel are blank. Therefore, the validation team raised CL04, and thisCL was resolved in the “Findings” below.
<Findings>
CL04
The blank cells in Monitoring Plan Sheet are requested to fill in to avoid thedifferent meaning.
Resolution by the PPs
The blank cell in MPS and MRS is filled in with "-".
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team has reached the conclusion that the selected emission
sources and GHG types are justified for the JCM project. The validation team has
assessed values for project-specific parameters to be fixed ex ante in the MPS andintermediate processes to estimate the values. As a result, these are consideredreasonable in the context of the proposed JCM project. The issue raised by the teamhas been fully clarified.
C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
According to Kingdom of Saudi Arabia regulation stipulated in Royal Commission
Environmental Regulations 2015, Volume I, Regulation Standards, Environmental
Impact Assessment (hereinafter referred to as “EIA”) is not required, except a newly
installed project or a project for manufacturing a new product. The proposed JCM
project replaced the existing four units of electrolyzer (BiTAC model) and membranewith the latest model (nx-BiTAC model), and therefore it is not classified in either
category. It is also confirmed through interview with the PPs that the factory has beenauthorized by the government and has received the Environmental Permit for
operation in 2015, based on the environmental information report issued by JANA.
Since the proposed JCM project contains only renewal of facilities, it does not change
the environmental impact. Therefore, it is not necessary to renew the EIA because of
the proposal of JCM project.
Through the document review, the validation team raised CL01 for clarification.
This clarification request was resolved in the “Findings” below.

9

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Findings>
CL01
The PDD states that an EIA is not applicable (N/A) in Section D. However, it is notin line with the JCM Guidelines.
Resolution by the PPs
The answer of EIA in Section D was changed from "N/A" to “NO”, and thus thisCL is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team has concluded that the planning of the proposed JCM projectis in accordance with the EIA regulation in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (The answer of
EIA in Section D is in line with the JCM Guidelines).
C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
The PPs conducted a local stakeholder consultation on 31/10/2017 at meetingroom of JANA, located in Jubail Industrial City-31961, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It
was explained by the PPs that, since no local residents living near around the factory,
all participants of the stakeholder consultation were employees of JANA.
The local stakeholders provided positive comments for the proposed JCM project.
There is no negative issue that requires action to be taken by the PPs which raised
through the consultation. It is confirmed through the review of the relevant documents
and the interview with the PPs during the on-site assessment that the stakeholder
consultation process was appropriately conducted to collect stakeholder’s opinion.
The summary of the comments received in the consultation and due account of allcomments taken by the PPs are fully described in PDD. However, the stakeholder
implementation process was described incompletely in PDD, thus the validation teamraised CL03. This was resolved in “Findings”.
<Findings>
CL03
The description of local stakeholder implementation process was not written
completely in line with JCM Guidelines.
Resolution of CL03 by the PPs
The PPs added a description in the PDD, related to the results of invitation for the10

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

local stakeholder consultation. It was confirmed through interview with the PPs thatthey tried to invite government officials of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia at the invitation
stage, however as a result, the participants in the stakeholder meeting were only theemployees of JANA. The validation team considered it reasonable, and thus this CL
is closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team has concluded that the implementation of the local
stakeholder consultation of the proposed JCM project is adequate. The additional
explanation related to the local stakeholder implementation is appropriate and in linewith JCM Guidelines.
C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
In this proposed JCM project, the PPs have defined a single parameter “power
consumption of project electrolyzer during the period p”, ECPJ,i,p, to be monitored expost in accordance with the approved methodology. It is calculated by multiplying theamount of electric current and electric voltage of electrolyzers. The model of the projectelectrolyzers is nx-BiTAC, which consists of two units (RE120 and RE121) installed in
two production lines (A and B). Each electrolyzer has 68 cells, where the electric
current and the electric voltage of each cell is monitored by ammeter and voltmeter
respectively, and the data is collected automatically through Cell Voltage Monitoring
System (hereinafter referred to as “CVMS”). Two units of CVMS have been installed
to monitor two pairs of electrolyzers in every second. The collected data is recorded
by Distributed Control System (hereinafter referred to as “DCS”) and by Emergency
Control System (hereinafter referred to as “ESD”). A backup of data is automaticallyconducted for every three months. The electric voltage and electric current for eachcell in each electrolyzer recorded by DCS is downloaded in an Excel spreadsheet. By
multiplying of the total electric voltage of all cell in the electrolyzer with the electric
current of the electrolyzer, the power consumption of the electrolyzer is calculated andrecorded on a monthly basis.
It was confirmed that the latest calibration for CVMS was carried out on
03/01/2018, by an independent calibration service provider, Alazzaz Co. Ltd., who has
been accredited by the International Accreditation Service. The subsequent calibrationis scheduled on 02/01/2019.

11

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The roles and responsibility of the personnel are described in the Monitoring
Structure Sheet in accordance with the requirements of the applied methodology. The
monitoring structure consist of:-General Manager (Kanematsu), checking the monitoring data and electricity
generation reported, calculating GHG emission reductions based on themonitoring data. Also responsible for project planning, implementation, andreporting for JCM procedure.

-

Director (JANA), checking the reporting of power consumption.

-

Operation Administrator (JANA), taking and checking the data of power
consumption through DCS, preparing the reporting of power consumption,
and archiving data. Reporting the power consumption to Director (JANA) and
General Manager (Kanematsu)<Findings>
No issues were identified to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team has concluded that Monitoring Plan of the proposed JCM
project complies with the requirements of the methodology and JCM Guidelines, and
the PPs have ability to implement the described Monitoring Plan, including Monitoring
Structure Sheet.
C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
The MoC was submitted to the validation team for review in the latest form as of
the time of validation, JCM_SA_F_MoC_ver. 01.0, in which a person of Kanematsu isnominated as the focal point. The MoC was signed by the authorized representativesof all the PPs with the contact details.
The validation team has assessed the personal identities including specimen
signatures and employment status of the authorized signatories directly through theinterview with PPs during the on-site assessment. Primary authorized signatory of
Kanematsu is Mr. MAKOTO Yokoshi as Manager, Industrial Machinery & Plant
Section, Plant & Ships Department, and alternate authorized signatory is Mr. NORIO
Asami as Assistant Manager, Industrial Machinery & Plant Section, Plant & Ships
Department. Primary authorized signatory of Jubail Chemical Industries Company is
Mr. SEENIVASAN Veerachamy as Technical Services Director, and alternate
12

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

authorized signatory is Mr. TARIQ Farooq as Senior Process Engineer.
It is confirmed that all corporate and personal details including specimen
signatures and the information in the MoC, dated 30/01/2018, are valid and accurate
as requested in the JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification.
<Findings>
No issues were identified to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team has concluded that the MoC complies with all relevant forms
and requirements.
C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
It is declared in the MoC that the proposed JCM project is not registered under
any other international climate mitigation mechanism other than the JCM. For crosscheck, the validation team confirmed through checking publicly available informationof Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), Verified Carbon Standard (VCS), etc. thatthe proposed JCM project has not been registered under other international climate
mitigation mechanisms in terms of the name of entities, applied technology, scale, andthe location. Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed JCM project dose not resultin double registration/double counting of GHG emission reductions.
<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concluded that the proposed JCM project was not registeredunder the other international climate mitigation mechanisms at the stage of validation.

C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
The starting date of the proposed JCM project is set as 25/01/2017 in the PDD. It
is confirmed through the review of relevant documents, and the interview with the PPs
during the on-site assessment, that it is the starting date for monitoring activity.

13

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concludes that the start of the operating date of the proposed
JCM project has been defined appropriately.
C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
There was a lack of information related to the date of revision history of PDD.
Therefore, the validation team raised CL02. This clarification request was resolved in
the “Findings” below.
<Findings>
CL02
There is a lack of PDD revision history date.
Resolution of CL02 by the PPs
The date of PDD revision history is filled in with 19/12/2017 for PDD version 01.0,
and 05/03/2018 for PDD version 02.0. The validation team confirms that the revisionhistory of PDD has been revised appropriately, and thus this CL is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team confirms that no other issues remain.

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
In line with the JCM Project Circle Procedure, the PDD was made publicly available
through the JCM website for 30 days to invite public comments, in line with therequirement of the JCM the Project Cycle Procedure. This call for public comments
was open from 30 Jan 18 - 28 Feb 18 (24:00 GMT). The specific JCM website of the
proposed JCM project is as below, and no comment was received.
https://www.jcm.go.jp/sa-jp/information/252

14

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
Not applicable

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees
1. Kanematsu Corporation- Norio Asami, Assistant Manager, Industrial Machinery & Plant Sec./Global
Environmental Business Team, Plant and Ships Dept.
2. Jubail Chemical Industries Company (JANA)- V. Seenivasan, Technical Services Director (TSD) Director- Tariq Farooq, Senior Process Engineer- Mohamed Saleem, Senior Superintendent-Mechanical- J. Harikrishna Kumar, Senior Superintendent- Abdul Wajib, Instrument Supervisor-DCS, CVMS & Instrument- G. Anwar Habys, Instrument Engineer- M. Ali Akbar, Senior Superintendent Laboratory- Munawar Shah, Senior Operation Superintendent
3. Environmental Resources Management (ERM) Japan Ltd.
- Tsuyoshi Nakao, Team Leader of Sustainable Management TeamE.2. List of documents received
1.

Project Design Document, for publication (JCM_SA_F_PDD_ver02.0.DOCX)

2.

Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet, for publication(JCM_SA_AM001_ver01.0.XLSX)

3.

Modalitiesofcommunication

statement,forpublication(JCM_SA_F_MoC_ver01.0 .pdf)
4.

JCM Approved Methodology SA_AM001 (JCM_SA_AM001_ver01.0.pdf)

5.

Monitoring

Plan

Sheet

of

JCM

Approved

Methodology

SA_AM001(JCM_SA_AM001_ver01.0.xlsx)
6.

JCM Glossary of Terms (JCM_SA_Glossary_ver01.0)

7.

JCM Project Cycle Procedure (JCM_SA_PCP_ver02.0.pdf)

8.

JCM Modalities of Communication Statement Form (JCM_SA_F_MoC_ver01.0)

9.

JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring Report(JCM_SA_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0.pdf)

10. JCM Project Design Document Form (JCM_SA_F_PDD_ver02.0.docx)15

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

11. JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification (JCM_SA_GL_VV_ver01.0.pdf)
12. JCM Validation Report Form (JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0.docx)
13. Company profile of Kanematsu Corporation
14. Company profile of Jubail Chemical Industries Company (JANA)
15. Acceptance Certificate for bi-polar electrolyzers indicates the performance test
runs completed in January 25, 2017, which the day is determined as the starting
operation day
16. The durable year list stipulated in the Regulation of the Japanese Finance Ministry
No.15/1965 concerning the equipment lifetime, which used for determining theoperation life of the proposed JCM project.
17. The documents related to OJT implementation evidences, which indicated by the
Article 7 in the sales contract for bi-polar electrolyzer unit between Kanematsu
Corporation and Thyssenkrup Uhde Chlorine Engineers, and the attendance listof OJT.
18. Technical Appendix for Cell Room Package, which shows the technicalspecification of electrolyzers.
19. Certificate of Performance Guarantee Acceptance which indicates the guaranteed
DC Power Consumption of 1990 [DCkWh/MT-NaOH8100%] during 5 days of
performance guarantee test period (20-25 January 2017)
20. List of the main equipment replaced in the proposed JCM project No.20
21. Excel sheet rev2.1 used for showing CO2 reduction estimated calculation
22. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu, Royal
Commission Environmental Regulation 2015, Volume I, Regulation andStandards, which indicates the EIA is not required in the proposed JCM project
23. Environmental Information Report which indicates several revisions have been
done in the previous years and the Environmental Permit to Operate
24. Minute of Meeting for Local Stakeholder Consultation (LSC) including the agenda
and the list participant list
25. Presentation materials for the local stakeholder consultation provided byKanematsu Corporation, JANA CO. Ltd., and ERM Japan.
26. An overview of MRV including the document for DCS/CVMS monitoring data, theexplanation about Power Consumption Unit Calculation Method and the general
specification of CVMS.
27. Calibration Certificates for Monitoring point No.1 ( Data Acquisition Unit of MX100 model, Documenting Process Calibrator 754 model, Beamex MC5P model,
four units of CVMS connecter to each electrolyzer, density meter, four unit oftemperature transmitter for each electrolyzer, magnetic flowmeter), Specification
16

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

of Densimeter and Temperature Transmitter, including Preventive Maintenance
Report DCS & ESD System
28. Baseline Determination for the Electricity Grid in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,
grid emission factor (GEF) according to CDM regulations
29. Attendance list of participants in the on-site assessment
30. Transformer Specification, Technical Guarantee of Rectifier and Technical
Information of Rectifier Equipment.
31. Questions & Answer 180123 (Kanematsu Reply-the latest version)
32. Piping and Instrumentation Diagram Chloro-Alkali Plant, Catholyte Circulation,
which shows Install Location of Density Meter, Install Locations of the two units ofThermometer Transmitter, and Install Locations of the two units of ThermometerTransmitter.
33. DC Consumption data in 2017 recorded by BiTAC OPERATION DATA
34. List of Grid Emission Factors issued by IGES
35. PDD for registration (JCM_SA_F_PDD_ver02.0_Electrolyzer(Kanematsu
171201)_MOE(1218rev)Clean.docx)
36. MPS for registration(JCM_SA_AM001_IonExchange_DraftFinal171201_rev1.1(Kanematsu
171201).xlsx)

17

JCM_SA_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers

18