Innwoo Park Background History Overview
 Procedures Criteria
 Incentives
 Additional2

 Lack of students due to the low fertility

Need more inbound students to increase theglobal competitiveness◦ Japan : 300,000 inbounds by `20◦ China : 500,000 inbounds by `20◦ Singapore 150,000 inbounds by `15◦ Korea : 200,000 inbounds in `203 Rapid Increase in the number of inbounds inKorea
Year2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Total

22,52632,55749,27063,95275,85083,84289,537

86,878Course

5,212

7,938

14,184

19,521

20,08817,064

18,424

16,639College/Univ.

9,835

15,26822,171

28,19736,52543,70944,641

40,551Masters

4,023

5,183

7,247

9,143

10,697

12,48014,516

15,399Doctoral

1,719

2,173

2,638

3,245

3,369

3,811

4,496

4,639

etc

1,737

1,995

3,030

3,846

5,171

6,778

7,460

9,650

Language4

No quality control system for inbounds

Problems of mal
adjustment anddropouts

Negative imageof Korea being
built

Need for a quality control syste
m for inbounds★ Australia : CRICOS & PRISOM

5Committee of IEQAS(2011)•Sub-committee for the dev
elopment of IEQAS

Pilot test & selection of model sch •8 universities, 2 colleges
oolsFirst implementation of IEQAS(2012)•30 schools accredited (26 universities, 4 colleges)6 IEQAS : International Education Quality Assura

nce System 350 universities and colleges◦ Cyber universities, graduate universities being
excluded Aims to accredit universities and colleges

who manage inbound students according tothe criteria set by the committee of IEQAS
 The Committee of IEQAS◦ About 15 members appointed by MOE7 Eligibility for applying IEQAS◦ No sanctions to financial support by MOE◦ Less than 20% of dropout rate
◦ More than 19 inbounds for universities, 9 inbounds
for colleges◦ In 2012, 138 universities and 44 colleges wereeligible

8

Phase 1 Quantitative evaluation• 8 criteria for universities, 7 for colleges• top70% passes
Phase 2 Absolute evaluation• Core criteria : 6 for universities, 5 for colleges• Supplement with self reports from the schools• Identify universities who pass the core criteria

Phase 3 On-site evaluation• To verify Phase 2 evaluation results

9 Phase 1 Quantitative evaluation◦ Number and ratio of full time international faculty◦ Number and ratio of outbound students◦ Number and ratio of inbound students◦ Number and ratio of international students filling the student quota of universities◦ Dropout ratio of inbound students◦ Diversity of international students◦ International students’ impact on fiscal soundness◦ Accommodation provision rate for international students
10 Phase 2 Absolute evaluation◦ Dropout rate and illegal residency rate iscomplementary to each other.
Absolute indicatorIEQAS Standards① Dropout rate*

Less than 6%①-1 Illegal residency rate

Less than 1%② Diversity of international students*

Less than 90%③ Fiscal solidarity

90% or above④ Medical insurance subscription rate

80% or above⑤ Accommodation provision rate of freshmen

25% or above⑥ Language Ability (TOPIK level 4, English)

30% or above11 Vision, goals, strategies for inbounds

 Management of academic affairs
 Supports for learning, living, and others12 Effective for 3 years Allow to use the emblem
 Better chance toget thegovernment scholarshipfor inbounds

13 Quantitative Indicators
No1Contents

Point Distribution(Out of 100)

Number and ratio of full time international faculty

2.5

Number and ratio of outbound students

2.5① No. of full time international faculty② No. of full time international faculty / (divide) Number of full time
faculty x (multiply) 100(%)

2①No. of outbound students : No. of students who earned credits from other universities②Ratio of outbound students : No. of outbound students / (divide) No. of all enrolled students x (multiply) 100(%)

14

 Quantitative Indicators
No

3Contents

Number and ratio of inbound students

Point Distribution(Out of 100)5No. of exchange students to Korea / (divide) No. of all enrolled studen (only university)
ts x (multiply) 100(%)

4

Number and ratio of international students filling thestudent quota of universities

10①No. of international students filling the student quota of universities: No. of international students – (subtract) No. of domestic students s
hort of its full quota②Ratio of international students filling the student quota of universities : Ratio of international students x (multiply) Ratio of domestic students filling the quota

15 Quantitative Indicators
No
5

Contents

Point Distribution(Out of 100)

Dropout ratio of inbound students

35

Diversity of inbound students

15① No. of dropout inbound students / (divide) No. of total inbound students x (multiply) 100(%)

6①No. of inbound students from the country where the most numberof students come/ (divide) No. of total inbound students x (multiply)100(%)

16 Quantitative Indicators
No
7

Contents

International students’ impact on fiscal soundness

Point Distribution(Out of 100)
20

Average tuition per international student / (divide) Average tuition per dome
stic student x (multiply) 100(%)

8Accommodation provision rate for international students(No. of fresh international students living in school accommodation) divide)/ No. of all international students x (multiply) 100(%)

University : 10Junior College :1517

 Self-evaluation Report Format
No123

Dimension

SourceUniversity’s vision and characte 1-1. Vision of globalization
ristics for globalization
Measures to connect globalization and university development
International students recruitment strategy
1-2. Specialization of the university
Major target country or field
Various globalization programs
Selection of the international st 2-1. Is students’ scholastic ability verified?
udents2-2. Are students recruited by official procedures?
Does the institution have a reasonable student selection method to fill t
he international student quota?
Academic management
3-1. Attendance records
Are the attendance records of foreign students under control?
International students’ attendance ratio
3-2. Students’ school records
Foreign students’ grade distribution table: international students’ academic achievement compared with domestic students
 Through a random sampling, on-site evaluation is possible.
Does the school have syllabus (course guidelines) or school calendar?

18 Self-evaluation Report Format
NoDimension

4

International students manage
ment and support

5

OthersSource

4-1. learning support
Does the school have learning support programs (e.g. KSL or major courses) for international students?
Do foreign students have designated academic advisors?
4-2. Support and counseling centers for living in Korea
Is there any designated organization for international students?
Is there any counseling center and professional counselor?
4-3. Management of the foreign students after their graduation (e.g. employment)
Are foreign students taken care after graduation (e.g. employment supp
ort, alumni association)?
Does the school conduct satisfaction survey on education service?
4-4. Adaptation support program
Extra points can be provided if the school has differentiated programs to help international student’s adaptation to school life in Korea such as
by holding various events to that end.
Any special matter for the university19 Thank you

20