2

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

2.15 Food and Drink
2.15.1 Alcoholic Beverages
NMVOCs are produced during the processing of cereals and fruits in preparation for thefermentation processes The activity rate is the total annual production. The emission
factors given in the EMEP/CORINAIR Guidebook (SNAP 40606-40608) are shown in
Table 2-24.

TABLE 2-24
EMISSION FACTORS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PRODUCTION(KG/HL BEVERAGE)
Beverage

Emission Factor

Wine

0.08

Red wine

0.08

White wine

0.035

Beer

0.035

Spirits (unspecified)

15

Malt whiskey

15

Grain whiskey

7.5

Brandy3.5

The emission factors and sources are derived for Europe; there may be different
processes and emission factors in other parts of the world.

2.15.2 Bread Making and Other Food
The relevant precursor gas emitted during food production (SNAP 40605) is NMVOC.
Emissions from processes not included are vegetable oil extraction (SNAP 60404),
tobacco products and alcoholic beverages (see Section 2.15.1). Emissions are included
from all processes in the food chain which occur after the slaughtering of animals or
harvesting of crops.
Food production is divided into seven categories each with its own emission factor. The
emission factors given in the EMEP/CORINAIR Guidebook are shown in Table 2-25.
The activity rate is the total annual production of food. The emission factors and sources
are derived for Europe; there may be different processes and emission factors in otherparts of the world.

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2.41

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSESTABLE 2-25
EMISSION FACTORS FOR BREAD AND OTHER FOOD PRODUCTION(KG/TONNE)
Food Production Process

Emission Factor

Meat, fish and poultry

0.3

Sugar

10

Margarine and solid cooking fats

10

Cakes, biscuits and breakfast cereals

1

Bread

8

Animal Feed

1

Coffee roasting

0.55

2.16 Emissions
RelatedtoProductionof
Halocarbons
andSulphurHexafluoride( H F C s , P F C s a n d S F 6)
2.16.1 By-product Emissions
Chemical by-products of industrial processes, substances which are different from thedesired end-product, may be released into the atmosphere. It is well known that HFC-23
is produced along with HCFC-22 and it is estimated that the HFC-23 released from thissource is currently equivalent to 4 per cent of the production of HCFC-22 (U.S. EPA,
1994b) assuming no abatement measures.
In the Tier 1 methodology (Section 2.17.3), this factor, or a similar number derived forthe particular country's circumstances, can be used to estimate national emissions of
HFC-23 from the total national HCFC-22 production (for both potentially dispersive andfeedstock end-uses).
Problems with collecting specific component data can be
circumvented by providing a single number for total emissions of HFC-23.
By-product Emissions (tonnes) = By-product Factor (tonnes/tonne)
x Total HCFC-22 Production (tonnes)

For the Tier 2 methodology (Section 2.17.4), a potentially more accurate estimate is thesum of factory specific emissions determined using standard methods to estimate thecomposition and flowrate of gas streams vented to atmosphere. In this case:∫By-product Emissions = ∑i ∑j t fijCij

2.42

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

where:
the sum over all i plants, over all j streams in each plant of the emitted flows f andconcentrations c is integrated over time (t).
Other by-product emissions of HFCs, PFCs and other greenhouse gases from chemical
production processes should be identified and treated in the same way.

2.16.2 Fugitive Emissions
Fugitive emissions of a chemical occur during the production and distribution of achemical. In this chapter, fugitive emissions associated with use are not addressed
specifically, being counted in the emissions related to consumption (see Section 2.17). In
the case of fluorocarbon processes, fugitive emissions have been estimated to beapproximately 0.5 per cent of the total production of each compound (UNEP, 1994).
In the Tier 1 methodology, this factor, or a similar number derived for the particularcountry's circumstances, can be used to estimate national fugitive emissions of individual
HFCs and PFCs associated with national production. Problems with collecting specificcomponent data can be circumvented by providing a single number for total emissions ofeach HFC and PFC.
Fugitive Emissions (tonnes) = Fugitive Release Factor (tonnes/tonne)
x Individual HFC or PFC Production (tonnes)

For a Tier 2 methodology, a potentially more accurate estimate is the sum of factory
specific emissions determined using standard methods to estimate the composition andflowrate of gas streams vented to atmosphere. In this case:∫

Fugitive Emissions = ∑i ∑j t fijCij

where:
the sum over all i plants, over all j streams in each plant of the emitted flows f andconcentrations c integrated over time (t).

2.17 Emissions
RelatedtoConsumptionof
Halocarbons
andSulphurHexafluoride( H F C s , P F C s , a n d S F 6)
2.17.1 Overview
Partially fluorinated hydrocarbons (HFCs), perfluorinated hydrocarbons (PFCs), andsulphur hexafluoride (SF6) are serving as alternatives to ozone depleting substances(ODS) being phased out under the Montreal Protocol. Current and expected application
areas of HFCs and PFCs include (Kroeze, 1995; U.S. EPA, 1992b):

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2.43

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES-

refrigeration and air conditioning-

fire suppression and explosion protection-

aerosols-

solvent cleaning-

foam blowing-

other applications5

Primary uses of SF6 include:-

gas insulated switch gear and circuit breakers-

fire suppression and explosion protection-

other applications6

Partially and fully fluorinated hydrocarbons (HFCs and PFCs) are not controlled by theMontreal Protocol because they do not contribute to depletion of the stratosphericozone layer.
HFCs are chemicals containing only hydrogen, carbon, and fluorine. Prior to theMontreal Protocol and the phase-out of various ozone depleting substances (ODS), theonly HFCs produced were HFC-152a, which is a component of the refrigerant blend R500, and HFC-23, a low temperature refrigerant which is a by-product of HCFC-227
production. HFC-134a entered production in 1991 and a variety of other HFCs are now
being produced (Enquete Commission, 1994).
PFCs are chemicals containing only carbon and fluorine. PFCs have been produced commercially for 30 years, primarily for use as cooling/heating agents in specialised market
segments and in vapour phase reflow soldering and electronic safety testing (Kroeze,1995). Like HFC emissions, PFC emissions result from two sources; emissions fromcommercial use of PFCs and emissions as by-products of industrial processes. PFCs are
anthropogenic compounds; no natural sources have been found, though a small, but as yet
unidentified, natural source of one PFC is suspected (Abrahamson, 1992).
SF6 is a particularly potent GHG with a 100-year GWP of 23,900 and an estimatedlifetime of about 3200 years (IPCC, 1996)(Table 2-26).
The chemicals (HFCs, PFCs, SF6) are of concern, however, because they have high global
warming potentials and long atmospheric residence times.
Table 2-26 gives an overview over the most important HFCs and PFCs (U.S. EPA, 1992b;
UNEP, 1994; Kroeze, 1995), including application area and GWP relative to CO2 (100year integration time). The various HFCs and PFCs have very different strengths as
GHGs. PFCs have particularly high GWPs. The consumption pattern with respect to theindividual gases must be known, therefore, or estimated with reasonable accuracy, toachieve useful estimates for the contribution to global warming from emission of thesegroups of chemicals.
5 HFCs and PFCs may be used in sterilisation equipment, for tobacco expansion

applications, and as solvents in the manufacture of adhesives, coating and inks.
6 SF

6 may be used as an insulating medium, tracer, in leak detectors, and in various
electronic applications. Aluminium and magnesium foundries are also major users of SF6,
but the emissions associated with these industries are covered in Section 2.13.8

7 HCFCs - hydrochlorofluorocarbons.

2.44

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSESAs CFCs, halons, carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, and, ultimately, HCFCs arephased out, HFCs are likely be widely used as replacements. PFCs may be used to alimited extent. Even though up to 75 per cent of current application of CFC may becovered by different technologies in the future (McFarland and Kaye, 1992), HFC use is
expected to grow substantially.
NF3 is another gas which is likely to contribute to global warming. It may be used forchip etching (Cook, 1995) but is not included here.

TABLE 2-26
POTENTIAL APPLICATION AREAS AND GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIALS (GWPS) FOR HFCS, PFCS, AND SF6
GWPa

Refrigeration
and Air
ConditioningFire
Suppression
andExplosion
Protection

HFC-23

11700

x

x

HFC-32

650x

HFC-125

2800

x

x

HFC-134a

1300

x

x

HFC-143a3800x

HFC-152a140x

HFC-227ea2900

x

HFC-236fa

6300

x

x

HFC-245ca

560

x

x

Chemical

Foam
Blowing

Other
Applicationsb

x

x

x

x

x

x

Aerosols

Solvent
Cleaning

x
x
x

x

x

x

HFC-356x

HFC-43-10xPFC-1169200

x

PFC-2187000

x

PFC-4107000

PFC-614x
x

Other PFCsc
SF6 d

x
x

23900

x

x

a 100 year time horizon (IPCC, 1996).
b Other applications include sterilisation equipment, tobacco expansion applications, and as solvents in the manufacture of adhesive
coatings and inks (Kroeze, 1995; U.S. EPA, 1992b).
c E.g., PFC-512, PFC-612, PFC-716, PFC-819.
d Gas insulated switchgear and circuit breakers.

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2.45

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

2.17.2 General Methodology
Emissions from industrial processes can be estimated in two ways; as potential emissions,Tier 1, (a and b), and as actual emissions, Tier 2.
Potential emissions of a certain chemical are equal to the amount of virgin chemical
consumed in the country minus the amount of chemical recovered for destruction orexport in the year of consideration. All chemicals consumed will eventually be emitted tothe atmosphere over time if not destroyed8, and in the long term (e.g., 50 yrs), potential
emissions will equal actual emissions.
However, the method does not take into account accumulation or possible release9 ofchemical in various products and equipment, which means over the short term (e.g.,
10-15 yrs) estimates may become very inaccurate. Since accumulation is thought to be
the dominant process at the present time, potential emission calculations will strongly
over estimate emissions.
The error is minimised when enough time has passed for HFC/PFC-containing equipment
and products to begin to be retired. However, as long as emissions lag behindconsumption and consumption continues to grow, the overestimation will persist. The
error is zero only if there is no delay in emissions or if the consumption growth rate iszero for a long period of time.
Actual emission estimates take into account the time lag between consumption andemission, which may be considerable in some application areas, e.g., closed cell foams,
refrigeration and fire extinguishing equipment. Time lag results from the fact that achemical is placed in new products and then slowly leaks out over time. A household
refrigerator, for example, emits only small amounts of refrigerant through leakage andemissions during servicing throughout its lifetime and most of its charge is not released
until its disposal, many years after production.
The amount of a chemical escaping to the atmosphere in a given year will only be similar
to the quantity consumed in a static situation with respect to chemical usage pattern,market development, system or product design and tightness, servicing and recovery
practices, etc. This is very different from the current situation. Since countries are only
beginning to use and produce the chemicals, only a small fraction of products with
HFCs/PFCs are being stored in the market.
Until a more stationary situation is established, which may take 15-20 years forindustrialised countries and an additional 10 years for developing countries, the time lag
between consumption and emission has to be taken into account to achieve reasonably
correct estimates for annual emissions.
Hence, actual emissions estimates are the most accurate with respect to emissions inindividual years, provided that the necessary information is available for their calculation.
If essential data are not available, the potential emission calculations provide a more
simple approach for reasonable emission estimates.
The following procedures described for HFCs/PFCs are applicable for SF 6 as well.

8 The destruction of fluorocarbons could be costly but there are several destruction

processes recommended by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol: liquid injection
incineration; reactor cracking; gaseous/fume oxidation; rotary kiln incinerators; cementkilns; plasma destruction; municipal solid waste incinerators (foams only).
9 If non-halocarbon technology takes over market shares.

2.46

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

2.17.3 Tier 1: Basic Method
2.17.3.1 Overview
Potential emission calculations are regarded as the basic methodology for HFC and PFC
emission estimates, which any country should apply. However, if relevant information isavailable, it is recommended that emissions are reported according to the Tier 2
methodology in Section 2.17.4.
Since net consumption of a chemical equals production plus imports minus exports, thecalculation formula for the basic method (Tier 1) is as follows:
Potential Emissions = Production + Imports - Exports - Destruction

Although destruction of HFCs and PFCs is currently not practised, and may be technicallydifficult (U.S. EPA, 1995), it should be included as a future option to reduce emissions.
By-product emissions during HFC/PFC production and fugitive emissions related to
production and distribution have to be calculated separately, as described in Section 2.16.
Production refers to production of new chemical. Reprocessing of recovered fluid should
not be included. Imports and exports include bulk chemicals and may or may not include
the quantity of chemical contained in products, such as refrigerators, air-conditioners,
packaging materials, insulating foams, fire extinguishers etc.
There are two versions of Tier 1 (a and b) depending upon whether HFCs/PFCs in
products are taken into account. In Tier 1a, chemicals contained in products are notconsidered. In Tier 1b, chemicals contained in products are considered. The reason for
two versions is that it is expected that there may be difficulties in many countries withthe availability of data regarding imports and exports of HFCs/PFCs in products, at leastin the short term. The Tier 1b methodology is preferred if relevant data are available.
Irrespective of the Tier 1 methodology chosen, emissions with respect to individual HFCs
and PFCs have to be reported. Information on the practical use of the various
commercial types of HFC/PFC refrigerants, blowing agents, solvents, etc. will be required.
Many of these products are mixtures of two to four HFCs/PFCs, and the composition of
fluids for similar purposes may vary according to individual formulas developed by thedifferent chemical companies.

2.17.3.2 Tier Ia
Quantities of HFCs/PFCs contained in various products imported into or exported froma country may be difficult to estimate. In Tier 1a, only chemicals imported or exported inbulk are considered in the calculation of potential emissions, which is a similar approachpresently used to report Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) under the Montreal
Protocol. The following definitions apply:
Imports = Imported HFC/PFC in bulk
Exports = Exported HFC/PFC in bulk

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2.47

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSESThe application of Tier 1a may lead to underestimation or overestimation of potential
emissions, depending on whether the majority of HFC/PFC containing products is being
imported or exported.
Data on production and exports of chemicals in bulk should be available from chemicalcompanies. Information on imports of chemicals in bulk may be available from customs
services. National environmental protection authorities may keep records of HFCs/PFCs
destroyed, if any.
Potential emission data for each individual chemical should be calculated according to thescheme in Table 2-27:
TABLE 2-27
CALCULATION SCHEME FOR POTENTIAL EMISSIONS ACCORDING TO TIER 1a
Reporting year:
Type of chemical (e.g., HFC-134a):

Production of chemical

tonnes+ Import of chemical in bulk

tonnes- Export of chemical in bulk

tonnes- Destruction of chemical

tonnes= Sum (potential emission of chemical)

tonnesEmissions related to production and distribution of HFCs/PFCs have to be taken into
account as described in Section 2.16.2.

2.17.3.3 Tier 1b
Tier 1b is an extension of Tier 1a and includes HFCs/PFCs contained in various products
which are imported and exported. The following definitions then apply:
Imports = Imported chemical in bulk + quantity of chemical imported in
HFC/PFC containing products
Exports = Exported chemical in bulk + quantity of chemical exported in
HFC/PFC containing products

Data on production and exports of HFCs/PFCs in bulk should be available from thechemical companies to their national governments. Information on imports of bulk
chemicals should be available from customs services, as well as imports and exports ofproducts and equipment containing HFCs or PFCs. National environmental protection
authorities may keep records of HFCs/PFCs destroyed.
To calculate the potential emissions according to Tier 1b, the calculation scheme in Table
2-27 has to be extended to include the import and export of chemicals in products.
Table 2-28 demonstrates a possible set-up for calculation of emissions fromexports/imports and the results should be added to the emissions calculated using Table
2-27. In Table 2-28, HFC-xxx is used as an example to demonstrate the procedure,
which in practice will have to be performed for individual HFCs and PFCs, and with SF6.

2.48

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSESTABLE 2-28
ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS FOR ESTIMATINGPOTENTIAL EMISSIONS ACCORDING TO TIER 1B

Refrigeration
GHFC-xxx=

G(Unit i) x n (Unit i) x FHFC-xxx(Unit i) + - - - - - +G(Unit m) x n (Unit m) x FHFC-xxx(Unit m)where:
GHFC-xxx=

total import (export) of HFC-xxx in precharged refrigeration
units10G(Unit i)=

refrigerant charge(i = i → m)n(Unit i)=number of refrigeration units of type "i" imported (exported)

FHFC-xxx=

fraction of component HFC-xxx11 in the refrigerant (mixture) of
a unit of type "i"inarefrigeration

unit

of

type

"i"

Foam products12
GHFC-xxx =V(Foam i) x JHFC-xxx(Foam i) + - - - - - - - +V(Foam m) x JHFC-xxx(Foam m)where:
GHFC-xxx=

total import (export) of HFC-xxx in foams (flexible and rigid)

V(Foam i)=volume of(i = i → m)

JHFC-xxx=

remaining amount of blowing agent HFC-xxx per volume unit offoam of type "i"

foam

of

type

"i"

imported(exported)

10 "Refrigeration units" may be refrigerators, ice machines, AC window units, split-

units, chillers etc. Typical charge ranges for various types of equipment are given in
Section 2.17.4.2.
11 Many refrigeration units will contain HFC/PFC-mixtures.

The fraction of eachchemical (HFC-xxx) has to be considered.
12

Include insulating and non-insulating foams in a variety of products, likerefrigerators, insulation panels, pour-in-place sprays, car seats, furniture, bedding,packaging material etc.

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2.49

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

Fire extinguishers
GHFC-xxx=

G (Unit i) x n (Unit i) x FHFC-xxx(Unit i) + - - - - +G (Unit m) x n (Unit m) x FHFC-xxx(Unit m)where:
GHFC-xxx=

total import (export) of HFC-xxx in precharged fire
extinguishers

G(Unit i)=charge of fire extinguishing agent in a fire extinguishing unit oftype "i" (i = 1 → m)n(Unit i)=number of fire extinguishing units of type "i" imported(exported)

FHFC-xxx=

fraction of component HFC-xxx13 in the fire extinguishing
agent of a unit of type "i"Solvents
GHFC-xxx=

G (Solvent i) x FHFC-xxx(Solvent i) + - - - - - - - +G (Solvent m) x FHFC-xxx(Solvent m)

where:
GHFC-xxx=

total import (export) of HFC-xxx in solvents

G(Solvent i)=quantity of(i = i → m)

FHFC-xxx=

fraction of component HFC-xxx14 in solvent of type "i"solvent of

type

"i"

imported(exported)

Aerosols
GHFC-xxx=

G(Can i) x n (Can i) + - - - - - - - +G(Can m) x n (Can m)where:
GHFC-xxx=

total import (export) of HFC-xxx in aerosol cans

G(Can i)=charge of HFC-xxx propellant in an aerosol can of type "i"(i = i → m)n(Can i)=number of aerosol cans of type "i" imported (exported)

13 Most fire extinguishing units will contain HFC/PFC-mixtures.

The fraction of eachchemical (HFC-xxx) has to be considered.
14 Solvents will normally not be pure HFCs or PFCs.

The fraction of the HFC/PFC in

consideration (HFC-xxx) has to be considered.

2.50

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

2.17.4 Tier 2: Advanced Method
2.17.4.1 Overview
The advanced method, Tier 2, contains actual emission calculations for each individual
chemical, comparable with methods currently applied by AFEAS for CFCs and HCFCs(Gamlen et al., 1986; Fisher and Midgley, 1993; AFEAS, 1995). This is the preferred
method if input data are available. Some countries may have the relevant information
available already to apply the Tier 2 methodology. However, countries that do not arerecommended to establish routines to report HFC/PFC emissions according to Tier 2.
The Tier 2 methodology:a)calculates or estimates the consumption of each individual HFC and PFC chemical
at a rather detailed level, e.g., refrigerators, other stationary refrigeration/AC
equipment, soft foam, hard foam etc., to establish the volume basis for emission
calculations.

b)estimates emissions on the basis of the consumption distribution from (a), andemission characteristics related to various processes and equipment, also taking
current service and recovery practices into account.

Table 2-29 gives examples of current HFC/PFC use distribution among various application
areas in certain countries. Since HFCs and PFCs have only recently entered the market,
the relative size of each area will change over time and will have to be updated. This
information may allow countries with similar practices to those in Table 2-29 to makefirst order estimates for their own HFC/PFC consumption and distribution.
TABLE 2-29
EXAMPLE DISTRIBUTION OF HFC/PFC USE BY APPLICATION AREA (1994)
Country

Refrigeration
Air
Conditioning

Foam
Blowing

Solvent

Fire
Extinguishing

Aerosol
Propellant

Other
Applications

Norway

99%

<1%

0%

<1%

0%

0%

Sweden

90%

5%

0%

0%

5%

0%

UnitedKingdoma

76%

12%

0%

7%

5%

0%

a March Consulting Group (1996), UK Use and Emissions of Selected Halocarbons, A Study for the UK Department ofEnvironment.

Any given application area may employ several types of HFC/PFC fluid. Consumption
figures should be collected or estimated and the type of HFC/PFC used should be
identified.
Nevertheless, real emission data for a given year will never be exactly known, irrespectiveof the refinement of the estimation methods. Cross checking of integrated emission
figures against real net consumption of HFC/PFC, together with judgement of banking
over the same period of time must be performed at regular intervals, and the input
factors have to be adjusted to achieve agreement over time.
Examples of how the Tier 2 methodology may be applied are given in the remainder ofthis chapter.

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2.51

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

2.17.4.2 Estimation Of Emissions Of HFCs
And PFCs From Use In Refrigeration
And Air Conditioning Equipment
Overview
HFCs and PFCs are potential replacements to the use of CFCs and HCFCs inrefrigeration and air conditioning equipment. A wide array of such equipment is used globally. For the purposes of emission estimation, refrigeration and air-conditioning systems
are classified into three categories, according to emission characteristics:• Household refrigerators and freezers;• Other stationary refrigeration and air conditioning equipment, including:-cold storage warehouses;-

retail food refrigeration;-industrial process refrigeration;-commercial and industrial appliances such as refrigerated vending machines, ice
machines, dehumidifiers, and water coolers;-

refrigerated transport including trucks, trains, and ships with refrigerated
compartments;-

commercial and residential air conditioning including chillers, heat pumps,
window air conditioners, centralised air conditioners.

• Mobile air conditioners used to cool the passenger compartment of automobiles,
trucks, buses, and trains.
HFC-134a is the primary fluorocarbon substitute for CFC-12 in many refrigeration andair-conditioning applications including refrigerators, chillers, and mobile air conditioners.
Other HFCs may also be used in refrigeration applications, particularly as components ofblends. These include HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-143a, and HFC-152a (Du Pont,
1994; Fay, 1995). PFC-218 is used as a component in refrigerant blends from (at least)
one manufacturer. PFC-116 may be used in a blend as a substitute for R-503. In
addition, a significant portion of the refrigerant market may be taken over by nonhalocarbon technologies (McFarland & Kay, 1992).
Calculation methods
Gas emissions from refrigeration and air conditioning systems result from:• losses during system erection/assembly15 ;• emissions from the stock of existing systems (small leakages, breakdowns, venting atservice);• venting of refrigerant at system disposal.
Methods for estimating average emission rates for the above-mentioned sectors are
outlined below.

15 e.g., losses from using HFC/PFC as tracer gas for checking leak tightness, losses inrelation to system development and testing etc.

2.52

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSESThe quantity of refrigerant emitted during system assembly is related to the amount charged
by the following empirical formula:
EQUATION 1
E assembly, t = E charged, t • (k/100)
where:
Eassembly,t=emissions during system manufacture/assembly in year t

Echarged,t=the amount of refrigerant charged into new systems in year tk=assembly losses in per cent of the amount charged

The amount charged (Echarged,t) should include all systems which are charged in the
country, including those which are made for export. Systems that are imported
precharged should not be considered.
Typical range for the emission factor k is 2-5 per cent (Radian Corp., 1986). For some
types of unit production, alternative leak detection methods may be used. Assembly
losses may then be less than indicated here, and in some cases may be negligible.
Annual leakage from the stock, including venting during service, is commonly expressed inper cent of total amount of “banked” refrigerant in the existing stock of systems.
Emission rates related to current system design and service practices are available fromhalf a century of CFC and HCFC refrigeration. The following calculation formula applies:
EQUATION 2
E operation, t = E stock, t • (x/100)
where:
Eoperation,t=amount of HFC/PFC emitted during system operation in year t

Estock,t=amount of HFC/PFC stocked in existing systems in year tx=annual leakage rate in per cent of total HFC/PFC charge in thestock, per cent.

In calculating the refrigerant “bank” (Estock,t) all systems in operation in the country(home-made and imported) have to be considered.
Examples of typical leakage rates (x) for various types of equipment describing therespective refrigeration sectors are given later in this section.
The amount of refrigerant released from scrapped systems depends on the amount ofrefrigerant left at the time of disposal, and the portion recovered. Normally, lessrefrigerant is left than was originally charged. From a technical point of view, the majorpart of the remaining fluid can be recovered.
To estimate emissions at system disposal, the following calculation formula is applicable:

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2.53

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSESEQUATION 3

E disposal, t = Ei charge (t - n) • (y/100) • (100 - z )/100orE disposal, t = Ei charge (t - n) • Q
where:
Edisposal,t=amount of HFC/PFC emitted at system disposal in year t

Ei charge (t-n)=

amount of HFC/PFC initially charged into new systems installed inyear (t-n)

n=average equipment lifetime, yearsy=amount of HFC/PFC in systems at time of disposal in per cent ofinitial charge, per centz=amount of HFC/PFC recovered in per cent of actual charge(“recovery efficiency”), per centQ=

amount of HFC/PFC emitted at system disposal in per cent of thequantity of chemical originally charged into the system, per cent
Q=y (100-z)/100

In estimating the amount of refrigerant initially charged into the systems (Ei charged, (t-n)),both systems charged in the country (for home market) and systems imported
precharged should be taken into account. First charge of systems made for export
should not be considered.
Values applicable to n, y and z are discussed later in this section when dealing with therespective sectors.
Total emissions in year t will then be found as the sum of emissions at assembly, during
operational life and at disposal:
EQUATION 4

E total, t = E assembly, t + E operation, t + E disposal, tEstimating input data for actual emission calculations
To provide a good basis for emission calculations according to Tier 2, it appears thatmuch detailed information (Equations 1-3) about HFC/PFC use is required. The mostimportant information is reliable estimates for the overall consumption and consumption
distribution.
In principle, there are two different approaches to determine consumption figures. One
is to estimate the amounts and types of each chemical from the number of refrigerating
and air conditioning systems in question ("bottom-up approach").
Alternatively, one may start with more general registrations or estimates of HFC/PFC use
for refrigeration purposes, and distribute these figures among the various sectors
according to the relative magnitude of each sector ("top-down approach"). A reasonably
good distribution key has to be developed also with respect to the individual types of

2.54

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

HFCs/PFCs. Refrigeration and air conditioning organisations in the country may possess
useful data with respect to the information required.
A bottom-up approach may work well when estimating emissions from refrigerating unitsof similar type and design, the number of which may be large but known (such as
refrigerators, AC units, mobile air conditioners etc.).
The top-down approach is more general, and probably more practical for systems which
are erected and charged at site, and for production of systems with large variations in
purpose, design and charge. This approach is less likely to under-estimate emissions,since it is based on total HFC/PFC consumption figures.
It may be practicable to apply elements from both approaches. However, one has to be
cautious about double counting.
Examples demonstrating the top-down approach are provided in Table 2-30, which shows
distribution of individual HFCs/PFCs within the same sectors.

TABLE 2-30
DISTRIBUTION OF INDIVIDUAL HFCS/PFCS IN REFRIGERATION, IN NORWAY AND SWEDEN, IN 1994
HFC-23

HFC-32

HFC-125

HFC-134A

HFC-143A

HFC-152A

PFC-218

Householdrefrigeration

Norway

0

0

0

100%

0

0

0

Sweden

0

0

0

100%

0

0

0

Other
stationary
equipment

Norway

<1%

<1%

19%

71%

7%

2%

<1%

Sweden

<1%

<1%

<5%

95%

<5%

<1%

<1%

Mobile air
conditioning

Norway

0

0

0

100%

0

0

0

Sweden

0

0

0

100%

0

0

0

Estimated amounts of the various "base chemicals" going into each specified sector may
follow from total quantities HFCs/PFCs consumed and the distribution keys laid down in
Table 2-29. Since HFCs and PFCs have only recently entered the market, consumption
figures for the various chemicals relative to each other may change somewhat over time.
These figures may be useful for countries with similar practices as those shown in thetable, to make first estimates for their own HFC/PFC consumption distribution in
refrigeration.
Estimating emissions from household refrigeration
Information for household refrigerators and freezers is very reliable, and emission rates
in the form of leakages and service losses are very low. Average lifetime is expected to
be 15 years (n in Equation 3 is equal to 15). Even though a refrigerator is sensitive withrespect to low charge, it is estimated that only 1 per cent of the units in operation faileach year due to loss of charge (U.S. EPA, 1992a), resulting in an average refrigerant loss
per year of 1 per cent of the total quantity banked in the stock.
A certain, but small amount of the charge of those refrigerators reaching the average
lifetime will have escaped during operation. The remaining charge is emitted upon
disposal of the refrigerator (Kroeze 1995; U.S. EPA 1992a). This was common practice
until recently. Over the past 2-4 years, recovery and recycling practices have been

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2.55

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

established in many countries to minimise CFC emission. Similar practices may be applied
to reduce HFC/PFC emission as well.
In the industrialised world, the overwhelming majority of household refrigerators are notserviced during their lifetime (U.S. EPA, 1992a). However, recharging is very common in
many developing countries, and 2 to 3 charges during the lifetime of a fridge may be
typical. From this it may be deduced that the average failure rate is higher in thesecountries, and the physical lifetime of a refrigerator may be longer.
Emission of HFCs/PFCs during assembly, operation and disposal of household
refrigerators and freezers in the year t are to be calculated according to Equations 1-4.
Emission factors related to system assembly, operation and disposal (k, x and Q
respectively) should be chosen according to each country's experience.
Example of common range of variation for k in the past is given under Calculation
Methods earlier in this section. It is believed that k for household refrigerators andfreezers belongs to the lower part of the range (2 per cent). In those cases where tracegases other than the refrigerant itself are used for leak detection, e.g., helium, k becomespractically zero.
American experience with respect to annual leakage rate, as referenced above, indicatesthat a typical value for x in developed countries may be 1 per cent.
The remaining charge after 15 years (y in Equation 2) is not well known, but is believed to
be in the order of 90 per cent. If recovery and recycling are not practised (z in Equation
3 is equal to zero), Q becomes equal to 90 per cent. However, if one allowed for therecovery and recycling which is possible now, Q could decrease to 40 per cent. The
practical recovery rate (z) for refrigerant in refrigerators is just below 50 per cent
(McCulloch, 1994). Kroeze indicates a range of recovery of 30-60 per cent (Kroeze,1995), which is consistent with the figure given by McCulloch (1994).
Reasonable estimates for the number of refrigerators and freezers manufactured in acountry are generally available, as well as the number of imported and exported units andthe total stock. The amount of refrigerant banked in the stock can be calculated bymultiplying the number of units with average charge sizes. American refrigerators havean average charge of 170 grams, while the corresponding figures for Europe and Japan are
140 grams and 137 grams respectively (Fischer et al., 1991; Fujimoto, 1991).
Refrigerators made in developing countries may have different (probably larger) averagecharges than those values indicated above.
Emissions from Other Stationary Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
Equipment
Other stationary refrigeration and air conditioning equipment is not usually hermeticallysealed and therefore has higher leak rates and requires servicing on a regular basis toreplace refrigerant leaked over time. In addition, these units typically have much larger
charge sizes than household refrigeration equipment.
Emissions of HFCs/PFCs during assembly, operation and disposal of other stationary
refrigeration and air conditioning equipment in the year t are to be calculated according
to Equations 1 to 4. Emission factors related to system assembly, operation and disposal(k, x and Q respectively) should be chosen according to each country's experience.
Average system lifetime is expected to be 15 years (n in Equation 3 is equal to 15).
An example of a common range of historical variation for k is given under Calculation
Methods earlier in this section. It is believed that k for factory built systems (unit

2.56

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

systems) belongs to the lower part of the range (2-3 per cent), while k for systems
erected and charged at site are higher (4-5 per cent).
Various references (Enquete Commission, 1994; U.S. EPA, 1993; McCulloch, 1994) seemto agree that leakage emissions from other stationary equipment are approximately 17
per cent on average (x = 17%).
Since all systems leak, the average charge at the point of disposal will be less than theamount initially charged into the systems (and after topping up at service). However,exact figures are not known. If country specific data are not available, 90 per cent of that
initially charged may be assumed for calculation purposes (y in Equation 2 represents 90
per cent). The charge remaining in the equipment upon retirement is normally vented (zin Equation 3 is equal to zero), which means that Q equals 90 per cent.
Emissions at assembly, during operation, and at disposal may be reduced through theimplementation of future actions designed to reduce leakage and disposal emissions.
Specifically, leakage rates in other stationary refrigeration and air conditioning equipment
can be reduced through the use of improved valves and fittings that minimise such
emissions, and emissions that occur upon service and disposal of equipment can be
reduced through the use of recovery or recycling technologies.
Assuming the implementation of these technologies, leakage emissions can be reduced toas low as 3 per cent (x = 3%) per year and emissions upon retirement of equipment canbe reduced by as much as 80 per cent (z = 80%, Q = 18%).
Refrigerant charge may vary over a wide range, dependent upon system size and design.
The following range may indicate orders of magnitude (U.S. EPA, 1993):• Residential air conditioning:

2 to 3 kg• Transport Refrigeration:

8 kg• Retail Food Refrigeration:

10 to 230 kg• Chillers:

75 to 900 kg• Industrial Process Refrigeration:

340 to 9100 kg• Commercial and industrial appliances: 0.10 to 0.50 kg
To apply the bottom-up approach, reliable average values for system charge sizes valid foreach country will be required to develop useful estimates.
Emissions from Mobile Air Conditioning (MAC)
Car air conditioners are relatively leaky systems that require frequent servicing.
Estimates for current applications are that approximately one-third of the charge isleaked each year (McCulloch, 1994), and that the remaining charge in equipment isemitted upon its retirement. Car air conditioners have typical lifetimes of 11 years (smallcars) to 15 years (trucks) (UNEP, 1989). On average, a lifetime of 12 years may be
assumed (n in Equation 3 is equal to 12).
Emission of HFCs/PFCs during assembly, operation and disposal of mobile air
conditioners in the year t are to be calculated according to Equations 1-4. Emission
factors related to system assembly, operation and disposal (k, x and Q respectively)
should be chosen according to each country's experience.
New HFC systems may have less leakage, e.g., 10-20 per cent (x = 10-20%) (Arai,
personal communication, 1996).

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2.57

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

Example of common range of variation for k in the past is given under Calculation
Methods earlier in this section. It is believed that k for MACs belongs to the upper partof the range (4-5 per cent).
With respect to x, a typical value according to past CFC/HCFC experience, as referenced
above, is, about one third (x = 30%).
Since MACs are generally more leaky than stationary systems, average charge at the pointof disposal will most probably be less than typical values for stationary systems.
However, exact figures are not known. If country specific data are not available, 75 percent of that initially charged may be assumed for calculation purposes (y in Equation 2 isequal to 75 per cent). In most cases, the refrigerant is vented at disposal (z in Equation 3
is zero), which means that Q equals 75 per cent.
With improved system components, such as improved seals, fittings, and hosing, and theuse of recycling at service, emissions from MACs during normal use (x) should eventually
be reduced to 10 per cent of the charge per year
In addition, recycling at disposal provides the opportunity to reduce emissions uponretirement by more than 80 per cent. If recycling is fully utilised, emission at disposal may
decrease to 15 per cent of the amount originally charged (Q =15%).
According to UNEP Technical Options Report (UNEP, 1989), typical refrigerant charges
in mobile air conditioners are 1.2 kg/unit for cars and 1.5 kg/unit for trucks. MACs innewer cars may have a lower charge, e.g., 800 g which is typical for Japanese passenger
cars (Nagayama, 1996).

2.17.4.3 Estimation of Emissions of HFCs and
PFCs from Foam Blowing
HFCs are potential replacements for CFCs and HCFCs in the manufacture of insulating,cushioning, and packaging foams. The specific compounds that may be used include HFC125, HFC-134a, HFC-143a, and HFC-152a (Kroeze, 1995; U.S. EPA, 1992b).
HFCs and PFCs may potentially be used as alternative blowing agents in the manufactureof open cell foam products such as cushioning and packaging foams. For open cell foams,
HFC and PFC emissions occur at the time of manufacture and are equal to 100 per centof the total quantity of chemical used as the blowing agent (U.S. EPA, 1992a; Fisher andMidgley, 1993). As a result total HFC or PFC emissions in year t for open cell foam canbe calculated as follows:
Emissions of HFCs or PFCs in year t=
100% of the quantity of HFCs or PFCs sold for blowing open cell foam inyear t

The total quantity of HFCs or PFCs used in blowing open cell foam can be calculated as
the quantity (in kg or tonnes) of foam manufactured in a given year times the quantity of
HCF or PFC used per kilogram or tonne of open cell foam produced.
Kroeze (1995) estimates that approximately 55 per cent of the HFC or PFC used as
blowing agent in the manufacture of open cell foams could potentially be recycled. If such
recycling occurs, total emissions from open cell foam manufacture would still be 100 per
cent of the chemical sold for foam blowing purposes but this would be less because the

2.58

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

amount in use would be reduced by a quantity equal to that recycled. Provided that 55
per cent of the blowing agent is recycled, the gas used for the blowing process will be a
mixture of 45 per cent virgin chemical and 55 per cent recycled chemical.
For insulating (closed cell) foams, only about 10 per cent of the blowing agent is released
during the blowing of the foam, while the remaining chemical is contained in theinsulation. This quantity remaining in the foam is slowly released over the 20 to 25 year
lifetime of the foam (Gamlen et al., 1986). HFC or PFC emissions from insulating foam inyear t are therefore calculated as follows:
Emissions of HFCs or PFCs in year t=
10 per cent of the total quantity of HFC or PFC used in manufacturing new
insulating foam in year t+
4.5 per cent of the quantity of original HFC or PFC charge blown into theinsulated foam manufactured between year t and year t-20

The total quantity of HFCs or PFCs used in blowing insulating foam can be calculated as
the quantity (in kg or tonnes) of new foam manufactured in a given year times thequantity of HFC or PFC used per kilogram or tonne of new insulating foam produced andwith 10 per cent production lost added. Typically, the blowing agent accounts for 6-15
per cent of the total foam weight (Fischer et al., 1991).
The total quantity of HFC or PFC contained in the existing stock of insulating foam canbe calculated as the product of the total quantity of insulating foam in use in year t andthe average charge of chemical contained in each tonne of such installed insulating foam.
Finally, Kroeze (1995) estimates that approximately half of the quantity of chemical
emitted during the blowing of insulating foam could be reduced through recycling and/orleakage control and that approximately 80 per cent of the HFCs or PFCs contained ininsulating foam at retirement could be recycled or destroyed (approximately 30 to 40 per
cent of the charge remains in the foam upon retirement). If such potential future actions
are implemented, then emissions in year t from insulating foam can be calculated asfollows:
Emissions of HFCs or PFCs in year t=
5% of the total quantity of HFC or PFC sold for use in manufacturing new
insulating foam in year t+
3.6% of the total HFC or PFC contained in the existing stock of insulating
foam in year t.

The production losses of 5 per cent represents net losses, that is the amount of blowing
agent escaped from the process minus the amount of blowing agent recovered.

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual

2.59

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

2.17.4.4 Estimation of
PFCs,
and
Extinguishing

Emissions of
SF6
from

HFCs,
Fire

HFCs and PFCs are potential replacements for Halon 1211 in portable fire extinguishers
and Halon 1301 in total flooding fixed fire extinguishing systems. Potential substitutes
include HFC-23, HFC-125, HFC-227ea, PFC-410, and PFC-614 (U.S. EPA, 1992b; Kroeze,1995).
McCulloch (1992) estimates that total halon emissions can be estimated as 60 per cent of
total halon 1211 contained in new portable halon fire extinguishers installed each year,
and as 35 per cent of total Halon 1301 contained in new total flooding equipment
installed each year. The remaining amounts of chemical, 40 per cent for portable fire
extinguishers and 65 per cent for total flooding equipment respectively, add to the bankof fire extinguishing chemicals.
Replacement HFCs and PFCs for fire extinguishing equipment are likely to be emitted atlower rates than the halons they replace, due to improved testing and practisingprocedures. Until these new procedures are adopted, however, emission rates for
replacement chemicals may be similar to those for existing systems.
The method used to estimate emissions here is appropriate for the mature market for
fire extinguishing agents. Transition to HFCs and PFCs in this market would result in a
relatively rapid increase in the banks of these materials held in equipment while the bankof halons would decline. Unless there is a requirement to replace the halons bank, theequations developed for halon emissions should be appropriate for HFCs and PFCs in thisapplication and so the estimate for HFC or PFC emissions from portable equipment inyear t would be:
Emissions of HFCs or PFCs in year t=
60 per cent of the total quantity of HFC or PFC used in new portablehalocarbon fire extinguishing equipment installed in year t

Similarly, emissions estimates in year t for total flooding equipment can be calculated as:
Emissions of HFCs or PFCs in year t=
35 per cent of the total quantity of HFC or PFC used new fixed halocarbon
fire extinguishing equipment installed in year t

Finally, McCulloch estimates that HFC and PFC emissions from the fire extinguishingequipment sector could eventually be reduced to 30 per cent of total sales for portablesystems and 15 per cent of sales for fixed systems based on improved housekeeping,
servicing, and bank management practices.

2.60

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:

Reference Manual