JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

JCM Verification Report Form
A. Summary of verification
A.1. General Information
Promotion of green hospitals by improving

Title of the project

efficiency / environment in national hospitals in
Vietnam

Reference number

VN002

Monitoring period

06/08/2015 – 31/10/2016

Date of completion of the monitoring report

24/12/2016

Third-party entity (TPE)

Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance Limited

Project participant contracting the TPE

Mitsubishi Corporation

Date of completion of this report

01/03/2017

A.2 Conclusion of verification and level of assurance
Overall verification opinion

Positive
Negative

Unqualified opinion

Based on the process and procedure conducted, Lloyd's
Register Quality Assurance Limited (LRQA) (TPE’s name)providesreasonableassurance

that

the

emission

reductions for Promotion of green hospitals by improving
efficiency / environment in national hospitals in Vietnam(project name)

Are free of material errors and are a fair
representation of the GHG data and information, and

Are prepared in line with the related JCM rules,
procedure, guidelines, forms and other relevant
documents(If overall verification opinion is <State the reasons>negative, please check below andstate its reasons.)
Qualified Opinion
Adverse opinion
Disclaimer
A.3. Overview of the verification results1

JCM_VN_F_Vrf Rep_ver02.0

Item

No CAR orCL

Verifi cation requirements

remalningThe

project The TPE determines the confonnity of the actLral
implernentation with project and its operation with the eligibility criteria ofthe eligibility criteria the applied rnethodology.

of

the

図

appliedmethodology
project The TPE assesses the status of the actual project andThe
implementation
its operation with the registered/validated PDD or any
against the registered approved revised PDD.
PDD or any approved
revised PDD

図Calibration frequency If monitoring Option C is selected, the TPE
and correction of determines whether the measuring equipments havemeasured values with been properly calibrated in line with the monitoringplan and whether measured values are properly
related requirements
corrected, where necessary, to calculate emission

reductions in line with the PDD and Monitoring
Guidelines.
Data and calculation The TPE assesses the data and calculations of GHG
of GHG emission ernission reductions achieved by/resulting fiom thepro.ject by the application of the selected approved
reductions

図

図

methodologv.

Avoidance of double The TPE determines whether the project is notregistration
registered under other intemational climate mitigation

図mechanisms.

Postchangesregistration The TPE detennines ,,vhether there are post
registration changes from the registered PDD and/or
methodolo-sy which prevent the use of the applied図

methodology.

Authorised signatory:

M..X

Last name: Chiba

First name: Michiaki

Ms.I

Title: Climate Change Manager - Asia & Pacific
Specimen signature:

Datc:01/03/2017

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

B. Verification team and other experts

Name

CompanyMr.
Ms.

Michiaki
Chiba

LRQA Ltd.

Mr.
Ms.

NguyenThang

External
expertFunction*

Schemecompetence*

Verification
team
leaderHostcountry
expertMr.
Ms.
Mr.
Internal
Xianxin Yan LRQA China
reviewer
Ms.
Please specify the following for each item.

Technical
competence*On-site visitTechnical
competenceauthorised
N/A

N/A

* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader,team member, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of verification, findings and conclusions based on reporting requirements
C.1. Compliance of the project implementation and operation with the eligibility criteria of theapplied methodology<Means of verification>
LRQA has determined during the verification process that the actual implementation andoperation of the project has been conducted in conformance with the eligibility criteria of theapplied methodology.
The project applied the approved methodology: JCM_VN_AM002_ver01.0 "Introduction of room
air conditioners equipped with inverters".
LRQA assessed by means of an on-site visit that the physical features of the project are in place
and that the project participants (PPs) have operated the project as per the eligibility criteria of
the applied methodology. The steps taken to verify each eligibility criterion and the conclusions
about implementation of the project are summarised as below.
Criterion 1: The methodology is applicable to the following types of projects:
・Installation of inverter room air-conditioners (RACs) to public sector buildings.
・Replacement of existing non-inverter RACs by inverter RACs in all types of buildings.
Justification in the PDD: The project newly introduces RACs equipped with inverters, and3

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

replaces some existing non-inverter RACs by inverter RACs at People's Hospital 115 and Viet
Duc Hospital.
Both People’s Hospital 115 and Viet Duc Hospital are national hospitals, administrated bynational government.
Steps taken for assessment: The verification team reviewed the project documentation andconducted on site assessment including physical visits to the hospitals, interviews andobservation of project RACs.
Conclusion: The verification team confirmed that the project introduced total 1,011 units ofinverter RACs to the 2 national hospitals. Some replaced the existing non-inverter RACs and theothers were newly installed. Both new installation of inverter RACs and replacement of existing
non-inverter RACs by inverter RACs meet the requirements of the criterion.
Criterion 2: Rated cooling capacity of a project RAC is within the applicable range of theVietnamese national standard TCVN7831:2012.
Justification in the PDD: TCVN7831:2012 is applicable to non-ducted air conditioners with a
rated cooling capacity up to 14kW.
Rated cooling capacity of project RACs are between 2.6kW and 3.65kW, within the applicablerange of the standard.
Steps taken for assessment: The verification team reviewed the technical specification of the
project RACs, the requirements of the national standard and conducted on-site assessment.
Conclusion: The verification team confirmed that the rated cooling capacity of the project RACs
are within the range of the National Standard TCVN 7831:2012 is applicable and the criterion is
met by the project.
Criterion 3: Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP) of the refrigerant used for project RAC is zero.
Justification in the PDD: Refrigerant used for project RACs is R410A whose ODP is zero.
Steps taken for assessment: The verification team reviewed technical specification of project
RACs and the Safety Data Sheet of refrigerant used and physically observed through the on site
assessment.
Conclusion: The verification team confirmed that the project RACs use R410A as the refrigerant
and its ODP is zero. Therefore the requirement of the criterion is met by the project.
Criterion 4: Plans to prevent release of refrigerants into the atmosphere at the time of RAC
removal are prepared for both project RACs and the existing RACs replaced by the project. In
the case of replacing existing RACs by project RACs, execution of the prevention plan ischecked at the time of verification, in order to confirm that refrigerant used for the existing RACs
removed by the project is not released to the air.

4

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

Justification in the PDD: To prevent release of refrigerants into the atmosphere due to theproject, at the time of RAC removal, the project plans to collect refrigerants from RACs removed
and ensure storage of collected refrigerants by using refrigerant recovery check sheet. In
addition, the project plans to provide relevant training for local workers to acquire adequate
refrigerant collecting technique. Procedures of refrigerant collection are outlined in refrigerant
recovery process.
Steps taken for assessment: The verification team reviewed the procedures and records of theplan implemented including the refrigerant collection, storage, and treatment.
Conclusion: The verification team reviewed the records and confirmed proper implementation ofrefrigerant recovery, collection and storage. The recovered refrigerant from the existing RACs
was kept in the dedicated storage throughout the monitoring period. CL2 and FAR1 were issued
related to this requirement as below.
The verification team confirmed that the eligibility condition is satisfied by the project byreviewing records of activities and interviewing the PPs through the on site assessment.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Fof this report.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CL 2
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to clarify the procedures to prevent releaseof refrigerant and address lost refrigerant from the air-conditioner PAC-C1-1.44.1 of Viet Duc
Hospital (Zone Clinics #107) in March 2016.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: In order to comply with the eligibility criterion 4, a plan
to prevent release of refrigerant into the atmosphere at the time of RAC removal was preparedand the procedures for refrigerant recovery were submitted. The PPs also submitted, as part ofevidence for proper storage of the recovered refrigerant, record of refrigerant storage, as well as
the set of document which record that collected and stored refrigerant was handed to theauthorized entity for decomposition process following Vietnamese regulation.
During the monitoring period, an incident of a project RAC (PAC-C1-1.44.1 placed at Zone
Clinics #107) not providing sufficient cooling was reported by Viet Duc Hospital staff in March2016. While all the project RACs were properly functioning for a few months after initial
operation, the trouble was observed after winter season when the RAC was not in operation for a
few months due to the low ambient temperature. The PPs will continue to periodically monitor
this specific RAC to prevent the refrigerant leakage in the future.
Assessment of the responses: A few RACs out of total 1,011 units installed in the project wasreported technical trouble during the monitoring period and the PPs took prompt actions to checkand repair to recover the normal operation. The subject RAC was noted loss of refrigerant gas at

5

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

start of hot season and the cooling operation. Proper functioning of the RAC was confirmed after
the initial installation. The verification team reviewed the procedures and records of measures
preventing release of refrigerant gas into the atmosphere and interviewed the PPs. The cause ofrefrigerant lost during the operation was considered as the installation work and it is difficult tototally prevent. The loss of refrigerant gas during operation was outside the scope of plan toprevent release of refrigerant but the PPs confirmed to periodically monitor operation of RACs
including the one reported the refrigerant lost. The CL was closed.
Grade / Ref: FAR 1
Nature of the issue raised: During the on-site assessment, the verification team noted that
air-conditioners were temporarily removed as below.
1) Outdoor units of air-conditioners were moved for B015 and B016 of the People's Hospital 115
on 24/11/2016 due to construction of a new building. The re-installation completed on theroof-top of the new building.
2) 12 indoor units were uninstalled on 03/12/2016 and 9 indoor units are planned to beuninstalled due to renovation in the Grand Floor of B-2 Building at the People's Hospital 115.
The un-installed indoor units will be re-installed in the same locations after the renovation.
The PPs were requested to maintain and present records of the works to particularly
demonstrate that the plan to prevent release of refrigerant into the atmosphere has been applied
to the verification of the next monitoring period.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The verification team confirmed that the project has been implemented in conformity with theeligibility criteria of the applied methodology. Actions to FAR 1 will be confirmed in the next
verification.

C.2. Assessment of the project implementation against the registered PDD or any approved
revised PDD<Means of verification>
The project is to reduce CO2 emissions by facilitating the utilisation of more energy efficient
inverter RACs in place of the conventional and more energy intensive non-inverter RACs in
Vietnam. Inverter technology enables air conditioners to operate with less electricity
consumption compared to the conventional types by varying revolution speed of the compressor
according to the desired room temperature and operating conditions.
The JCM project has been implemented at two national hospitals in Vietnam, that are People's
Hospital 115 in Ho Chi Minh City and Viet Duc Hospital in Hanoi. The PPs are Energy
Conservation Center Ho Chi Minh City (ECC) from the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, Mitsubishi

6

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Corporation and Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co.,
Ltd. from Japan.
The start date of project operation is on 06/08/2015 and the expected operational lifetime of the
project is for 10 years.
Total 1,011 units of energy efficient inverter RACs manufactured by Mitsubishi Electric
Corporation, Japan, have been introduced by the project. The project also introduces Energy
Management System (EMS), which is also designed by Mitsubishi Electric Corporation andoptimises operation of multiple inverter RACs. While energy efficiency improvement by EMS is
not numerically counted as the emission reductions by the project, introduction of EMS will
enhance efficient energy use in the public sector buildings.
The project has been selected as a demonstration project by the New Energy and Industrial
Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan, and receives partial financial support
from Japanese public funding.
The verification team assessed the Monitoring Report (MR) and the supporting documents,
conducted a physical site visit to assess the status of the actual project and its operation inaccordance with the registered PDD. No revision to the registered PDD was requested.
The details of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in the Section F ofthis report.
The verification team determined through the verification process that the implementation andoperation of the project has been in accordance with the description contained in the registered
PDD. The verification team, by means of a desk review and an on-site visit, assessed that:- all physical features of the JCM project described in the registered PDD are in place, and- the PPs have operated the JCM project as per the registered PDD.
The MR follows the Monitoring Plan (MP) of the registered PDD consisting of the Monitoring
Plan Sheet (MPS) and Monitoring Structure Sheet (MSS) that have been established based on
the approved methodology. There are monitoring points as the methodology provides, namely
Nos. 1-21 for the parameters EC_PJ,1,p to EC_PJ,21,p: Electricity consumption by project
RACs group 1 to 21 during the period p, No. 26 for the parameter ηREF: Highest energy
efficiency (cooling seasonal performance factor (CSPF)) of reference RACs and No. 27 for theparameter ηPJ: Lowest energy efficiency (CSPF) of project RACs. Number of RACs groups
remained 21 as originally planned and the monitoring points Nos. 22-25 were not applicable forthe monitoring period.
Electricity consumption by the project RACs has been measured by electricity meters installed
for each group of RACs. The parameters are monitored continuously and recorded electronicallyor manually every month. The electricity meters have accuracy class of 0.5s.
CSPF is determined ex-post based on the tests by third party testing facility once during the
project life using a calorimeter in line with ISO 5151 and the testing procedures and conditions

7

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

outlined in the latest version of the Vietnamese National Standard TCVN 7831. The project
introduced balanced ambient room type calorimeter to an independent national institute in thehost country. The highest value is to be chosen for the reference RACs and the lowest value is tobe applied for the project RACs as CSPF from the measured values for conservative calculationof the reference emissions in accordance with the applied methodology.
The management structure has been designed and roles and responsibilities have been
assigned to the Project Manager, Monitoring Manager and Facilities Manager as specified in the
MSS for each of 2 hospitals included in the project. The team of Japanese experts and thecontractors support the monitoring management as covered by NEDO model project for the
initial years of the implementation including the monitoring period.
Through the processes taken, CAR 1 and CAR 3 were raised and subsequently closed as theresolution detailed below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Fof this report.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 1
Nature of the issue raised: Data of the parameters Nos. 11 to 21 monthly recorded for August
2016 was lost. Although the parameters are continuously monitored by electricity meters without
interruption, the PPs were requested to take measures and prevent it from occurring in the future
monitoring periods.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The electricity meters continuously measured andkept accumulated data without interruption during the monitoring period. Therefore the lost
records of meter readings in August 2016 do not affect the completeness of the monitored data.
In order to prevent the same from occurring in the future, the PPs clarified the monitoringprocedures including the timing for visiting the hospitals, reporting and sharing the records
among parties, data back-up and internal checks.
Assessment of the responses: The verification team reviewed the monitored data, conducted onsite visit and physical observation of the electricity meters and confirmed that the electricity
meters were continuously measuring the data and accumulated data during the monitoring
period is available for the parameters. The monitoring procedures were confirmed including thepreventive actions for the future monitoring periods through the on site assessment andinterviewing the responsible persons. The CAR was closed.
Grade / Ref: CAR 3
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to demonstrate that the values of parameter8

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

Nos. 26 and 27 have been determined at a third party testing facility with submission of the
supporting evidence.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs have submitted the certification documents
issued by the testing entity for review by the verification team.
Assessment of the responses: The verification team reviewed the submitted evidence andconfirmed that the values of parameters are as determined at the third party testing facility. The
CAR was closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The verification team confirmed that the project was implemented and operated in accordancewith the registered PDD and no revision to the same was requested for the monitoring period.

C.3. Compliance of calibration frequency and correction of measured values with related
requirements<Means of verification>
The parameter Nos. 1-21 EC_PJ,1,p to EC_PJ,21,p applies the monitoring Option C and themonitoring of the parameters use electricity meters as the measuring equipment. Although themeters are not used for billing purpose and not a subject of the national regulations forcalibration of meters, the PPs applied similar quality controls as specified in the National
Standard DLVN 39:2012 with either regular calibration or replacement with new meters in 3
years. Initial calibration is in January 2015 for electricity meters in the People's Hospital 115 andin May 2015 for electricity meters in Viet Duc Hospital. Therefore the next calibration is planned
to be conducted after December 2017. No correction was required to the measured values tocalculate emission reductions in line with the PDD and Monitoring Guidelines during themonitoring period.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of the section.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The verification team confirmed that the measuring equipment applied for the parametersatisfied the requirements of the MP concerning the regular calibration and no correction was
required to the measured values during the monitoring period.

C.4. Assessment of data and calculation of GHG emission reductions<Means of verification>
The MR is developed using the Monitoring Report Sheet (MRS) applied to the registered JCM

9JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

project that is confirmed fulfilment of the requirements of the MRS of the applied methodology.
LRQA has determined whether:
1. a complete set of data for the specified monitoring period is available,
2. information provided in the MR has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log
books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analysis,
3. calculations of reference emissions and project emissions, as appropriate, have been carriedout in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the MP and the applied
methodology,
4. any assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified, and5. appropriate emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly
applied.
The project utilises energy efficient inverter RACs to reduce electricity consumption in thehospitals. The sources of GHG emissions are electricity consumption by reference RACs andproject RACs and CO2 is the GHG to be accounted. The reference emissions are determined asa product of monitored electricity consumption of project RACs, ratio of energy efficiency ofreference RACs and project RACs based on CSPF, and CO2 emission factor of the electricity.
The CO2 emission factor of the grid electricity is 0.560 tCO2/MWh as fixed ex-ante at thevalidation. The number of RACs group was set at 21 that was also fixed ex-ante.
The GHG emission reductions during the monitoring period are calculated as: ERp = REp - PEp
1,989.4 – 1,263.1 = 726.3 tCO2e for the location 1 and 552.7 – 400.2 = 152.6 tCO2e for thelocation 2. 726.3 + 152.6 = 878 tCO2e in total.
The verification team assessed the reported data with documented evidence and by means ofon site visit. Through the processes taken, CAR 2 and CL1 were raised as the resolution detailed
below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Fof this report.

Parameters
EC_PJ,1-10,p

Monitored

Method to check values in the monitoring report withvaluessources

2,254 MWh/p

Assessement was conducted based on records ofmonthly meter readings and on site assessment.

EC_PJ,11-21,p714 MWh/p

Assessement was conducted based on records ofmonthly meter readings and on site assessment.

ηREF

Location 1

Assessment was conducted based on test records of the

3.2

third party entity and on site assessment

3.2

10

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

ηPJ

Location 2
5.0
4.4<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 2
Nature of the issue raised: The parameters Nos. 11 to 21 included data during the months ofheating operation that the CSPF of the approved methodology is not applicable.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: For the parameters No. 11, 12, 14 to 21, electricity
consumption between 10 December 2015 to 6 March 2016 were excluded from emission
reduction calculation in order to avoid counting heating operation of the RACs connected to therelevant electricity meters. For the parameters No. 13, no RAC capable of heating operation isconnected to the electricity meter; therefore no winter month's electricity consumption was
deducted from the emission reduction calculation. As the result, Ex-post calculation of CO2
emission reductions for location 2 (i.e. Viet Duc Hospital) was reduced to 152 tCO2/p. Monitoring
report has been revised to reflect this result.
Assessment of the responses: The PPs excluded monitored data of the parameters Nos. 11-12
and 14-21 to which RACs having heating function are connected during the cool months from
10/12/2015 to 06/03/2016. The data after deduction of 50.2 MWh in total was reflected in therevised MRS and the emission reductions of the location 2 were decreased from 163 tCO2e to
152 tCO2e. The verification team assessed the revised MRS and data sheets, and confirmed thecalculation was correctly revised. The CAR was closed.
Grade / Ref: CL 1
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to provide detailed information on themal-functions of the project air-conditioners below.
1) An air-conditioner of People's Hospital 115 reported not cooling in September 20152) Air-conditioner PAC-B3-1.12 of Viet Duc Hospital (B-3 Orthopedic Zone 1F) reported notcooling and replaced its circuit board
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs provided information and related records forthe mal-functions and corrective measures.
Assessment of the responses: The verification team reviewed the information and records. The
manufacturer took relevant measures to quickly recover normal operation of the equipment
minimising impact to the GHG emission reductions by the project. The CL was closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
11JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

The verification team confirmed that appropriate methods and formulae for calculating reference
emissions and project emissions have been followed. The verification team is of the opinion that
all assumptions, emission factors and default values applied in calculations have been justified.

C.5. Assessment of avoidance of double registration<Means of verification>
The verification team assessed and confirmed relevance of the written confirmation from thePPs that the project is not registered under the other international climate mitigation
mechanisms.
The team in addition to the interviews with the PPs checked publicly accessible information of
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), Joint Implementation (JI), Verified Carbon Standard(VCS) and Gold Standard (GS) and found no identical project as the JCM project in terms of thename of entities, applied technology, scale and the location. The result of researches confirmedthat the project was not registered under the other international climate mitigation mechanisms
than JCM and it will not result in a double counting of GHG emission reductions.
Through the processes taken, CAR 4 was raised and subsequently closed as the resolution
detailed below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Fof this report.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 4
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to submit a written confirmation on that the
project is not registered under other international climate mitigation mechanisms.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs have submitted the written confirmations forreview by the verification team.
Assessment of the responses: The verification team confirmed that the PPs have submitted
written confirmations and the project was not registered under the other international climate
mitigation mechanisms. The CAR was closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The verification team confirmed that the project was not registered under the other international
climate mitigation programs.

C.6. Post registration changes<Means of verification>
The verification team assessed the project documentation and through the on site visit and

12

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

confirmed that there was no post registration change from the registered PDD or the approved
methodology.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
Through the verification processes, the verification team determined that there was no post
registration change from the registered PDD or approved methodology which prevent from useof the applied methodology.

D. Assessment of response to remaining issues
An assessment of response to the remaining issues including FARs from the validation and/or
previous verification period, if appropriate
No FAR was issued in the validation and this is the first verification of the project.

13

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

E. Verified amount of emission reductions achieved
Year

Verified
Reference Verified
Project Verified
Emission
Emissions (tCO2e)
Emissions (tCO2e)
Reductions (tCO2e)

2013
2014
2015

733

470

263

2016

1,808

1,193

615

2017
2018
2019
2020
878

Total (tCO2e)

F. List of interviewees and documents received
F.1. List of interviewees
Mitsubishi Corporation
Yosuke Kuroda, Assistant General Manager, Head of Hydrogen & Environment Business Team,
Environment Business, R&D Dept., Environmental Business Div.
Tamaki Inoue, Hydrogen & Environment Business Team, Environment Business, R&D Dept.,
Environmental Business Div.
Mitsubishi Corporation (Vietnam) Co., Ltd.
Naohiko Miki, Vice President
Ryosuke Ogata, Researcher, Senior Deputy Manager, Corporate Planning & Administration
Dept.
Tran Thi Thanh Ha, Business Manager, Machinery Department 1
Hua Quang Thang, Senior Associate, Infrastructure & Machinery Department, Ho Chi Minh City
BranchMitsubishi Electric Corporation
Hiroaki Makino, Manager, Engineering Sect. B, Room Air Conditioner Dept., Shizuoka Works
Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co., Ltd.
Chisato Nakade, Consultant, Clean Energy Finance Division14

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

Energy Conservation Center Ho Chi Minh City
Le Thi Kim Yen, Oversea Projects Coordinator
Pham Hoang Hai Quan, Energy Efficiency Consultant, Technical Department
Hoang Anh Tai
Hoang Anh Nhat
Nguyen Ngoc Nhat
Green Development Center
Mai Van Huyen, Director
Vu Thi Lan Anh, Project Coordinator, Head of Planning Department
Bui Thanh Son, Project officer
People's Hospital 115
Nguyen Dinh Phu, Vice Director
Nguyen Tuan Thanh, Manager
Nguyen Van Hieu, Manager of Administration Department
Nguyen Quoc Bao
Nguyen Ngoc Phu
Viet Duc Hospital
Nguyen Thi Bich Huong, Director, Medical
Nguyen The Dat, Deputy Manager, Equipment Department
Hoang Anh Toan, Staff of Equipment Department
Nguyen Nhat Duan, Staff of Equipment Department
Nguyen Thanh Tan, Staff of Equipment Department
Nguyen Cong Hoan, Staff of Equipment Department
Institute of Energy and Mining Mechanical Engineering (IEMM)
Vietnam National Coal and Mineral Industries Holding Corporation Limited
Nguyen Thu Hieu, Vice Director
Pham Thi Thu Thuy, M.Fin, Head, Project Management – Investment
Tran Thanh Chi, Expert of Project Development
Bach Duang, Operator
Luong Xuan Hung, Deputy Director of Center, Testing and Verification Center for Industry

15

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

Tonets Vietnam Co., Ltd.
Takeshi Hashimoto, General Director
Toru Takahashi, Project Director
Do Anh Tuan, Chief Manager & Engineer

F.2. List of documents received- Monitoring Report completed on 02/12/2016 and 24/12/2016- Monthly electricity meter readings records for People's Hospital 115 from August 2015 to
October 2016
- Monthly electricity meter readings records for Viet Duc Hospital from August 2015 to October
2016- Technical specification of project RACs MSY-GH and MSZ-GH series- Specification of balanced ambient room type calorimeter- TVCN 7830: 2012 Non-ducted Air Conditioners – Energy efficiency- TVCN 7831: 2012 Non-ducted Air Conditioners – Method for determination of energy efficiency- Power supply system diagram- Technical specification of electricity meters- Inspection certificates for electricity meters- Accreditation certificate for the calibration entity- List of electricity meters- Test reports issued by TVCI on energy efficiency of reference and project RACs
- Profile of TVCI and IEMM
- Specification of balanced ambient room type calorimeter, Ohnishi Netsugaku Co., Ltd.
- Refrigerant recovery check sheet- Records of refrigerant recovered, Tonets- Refrigerant storage reports, Tonets- Stored refrigerant hand-over report, Tonets- Minutes of handover for recovered refrigerant- Information of Geocycle and destruction of recovered refrigerant gas- License on hazardous waste treatment- Specification of the kiln and the procedures for destruction of the refrigerant gases- Certificates for treatment of recovered refrigerant gas, Holcim- Manifestos for transportation and treatment of recovered refrigerant- Power Meter Report August 2016
- Records of monthly electricity meter readings16

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0- Monitoring procedures- Training records dated 30/09/2015- Declaration letters from the project participants on avoidance of double registration- Records of corrective measures, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation- PDD Version 02.0 dated 25/08/2015 including the annexes- Validation Report- JCM_VN_AM002_ver01.0 Introduction of room air conditioners equipped with inverters- JCM Project Cycle Procedure JCM_VN_PCP_ver03.0- JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification JCM_VN_GL_VV_ver01.0- JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR JCM_VN_GL_PDD_MR_ver01.0 and
JCM_VN_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0- JCM Glossary of Terms JCM_VN_Glossary_ver01.0- Approved Small Scale Methodology AMS II.C. Demand-side energy efficiency activities for
specific technologies- ISO 5151:2010 Non-ducted air conditioners and heat pumps – Testing and rating for
performance- JIS C 9612:2013 Room Air Conditioner- The Ministry of Science and Technology Circular No. 23/2013/TT-BKHCN on Group 2
Measuring Instruments dated 26/09/2013- Decision No.02/2007/QD-BCN Issuing the provisions required technical equipment forelectricity meters counting the power plant, the Ministry of Industry, 09/01/2007- DLVN 07:2012 Alternating current induction watt-hour meters Verification procedures, 2012
- DLVN 39:2012 Alternating current static watt-hour meters Verification procedures, 2012
- TCVN 7589-11:2007 (IEC 62053-11:2003) Electricity metering equipment(a.c.) – Particularrequirements – Part 11: Electromechanical meter for active energy (classes 0.5, 1 and 2)- Outline of balanced ambient room type calorimeter, Ohnishi Netsugaku Co., Ltd.

17

JCM_VN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s verification team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers.
Certificate of Appointment is attached to this report.

18

Joint Crediting Mechanism Certificate of Appointment
Title of Project: Promotion of green hospitals by improving efficiency /environment in national hospitals in Vietnam (Project #VN002)
Verification for the first monitoring period: 06/08/2015 – 31/10/2016

We hereby certify that the following personnel have engaged in the verification process thathas fully satisfied the competence requirements of the verification of the JCM project.

Name of Person

Assigned Roles

Michiaki Chiba
Nguyen Tri Thang
Xianxin Yan

Team Leader
ExpertTechnical Reviewer

Signed byMichiaki Chiba
Climate Change Manager – Asia & Pacific06/09/2016

Lloyd's Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries, including Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Limited (LRQA), and their respective
officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this Legal Section as 'Lloyd’s Register'. Lloyd’s Register assumes noresponsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in thisdocument or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd’s Register entity for the provision of thisinformation or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.

MSBSF43618

Revision 0, 20 November 2014