米国連邦裁判所における期日の開催に関する通知
破産管財人は、米国連邦倒産法第 15 章に基づき、米国テキサス州北部地区連邦破産裁判所に対し、(1)米国政府との和解契約、(2)米国連邦倒産法第 363 条及び第 1520 条(a)(2)に基づく、和解契約の履行としての差押金の送金及び(3)米国連邦倒産法第 1521 条(b)に基づく、差押解除された金銭を日本の破産手続の配当に用いるための日本への送金に関する各承認を申し立てているところ、２０１７年４月２４日（米国中部時間）、当該裁判所にて、申立ての承認に関する期日が開催されます。
申立ての内容及び期日の開催の通知については、次項以下をご参照ください。

以上
Notice of Hearing before United States Bankruptcy Judge
Please be advised that the bankruptcy trustee filed a motion for an order approving (i) the
Settlement Agreement with the U.S. Government; (ii) Transfer of Seized Funds inAccordance with the Settlement Agreement Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § § 363 and 1520(a)(2);and (iii) Repatriation of Released Funds to Japan for distribution in the Japan Bankruptcy
Proceedings Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1520(b), and, in addition, that the hearing for the saidmotion has been scheduled for April 24, 2017 (Central Time, U.S.).
For the details of the motion and the notice of hearing, please see the following pages.

David J. Molton (admitted pro hac vice)
Daniel J. Saval (admitted pro hac vice)
Brown Rudnick LLP
Seven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: (212) 209-4800
Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
Email: dmolton@brownrudnick.com
Email: dsaval@brownrudnick.com- and Marcus A. Helt (TX 24052187)
Thomas Scannell (TX 24070559)
Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: (214) 999-3000
Facsimile: (214) 999-4667
Email: mhelt@gardere.com
Email: tscannell@gardere.com
Counsel for Nobuaki Kobayashi, in his capacity
as the Bankruptcy Trustee and Foreign Representativeof MtGox Co., Ltd., a/k/a MtGox KK
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXASDALLAS DIVISIONIn re:

Chapter 15

MtGox Co., Ltd. (a/k/a MtGox KK),

Case No. 14-31229-sgj-15

Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding.

FOREIGN REPRESENTATIVE’S MOTION
FOR AN ORDER APPROVING (I) SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT WITH U.S. GOVERNMENT; (II) TRANSFER OFSEIZED FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT, PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 363 AND 1520(a)(2); AND(III) REPATRIATION OF RELEASED FUNDS TO JAPAN FOR DISTRIBUTION
IN THE JAPAN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C § 1521(b)Nobuaki Kobayashi, in his capacity as the bankruptcy trustee and foreign representative(the “Foreign Representative”) of MtGox Co., Ltd., a/k/a MtGox KK (the “Debtor” or“MtGox”), a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding under Japanese law (the “Japan Bankruptcy”),
currently pending before the Twentieth Civil Division of the Tokyo District Court, Japan (the“Tokyo Court”), by his undersigned U.S. counsel, hereby respectfully submits this motion (the“Motion”) seeking entry of an order substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit H (the“Order”): (i) approving the settlement agreement between the United States Attorney’s Officefor the District of Maryland (the “Government”) and the Foreign Representative (the “Settlement
Agreement”), attached hereto as Exhibit A1, pursuant to sections 363 and 1520(a)(2) of title 11of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), insofar as the Settlement Agreement
provides for a transfer of an interest of the Debtor in property in the United States; (ii) pursuant
to Sections 363 and 1520(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, approving the transfer of $2,571,201.10
of the Seized Funds (the “Released Funds”) to the Foreign Representative and the forfeiture of$2,571,201.10 of the Seized Funds (the “Forfeited Funds”) to the Government in accordancewith the Settlement Agreement; and (iii) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 1521(b),approving the repatriation of the Released Funds to Japan for distribution in the Japan
Bankruptcy. In support of this Motion, the Foreign Representative also submits the Declarationof Nobuaki Kobayashi (the “Kobayashi Declaration”) attached hereto as Exhibit B, andrespectfully states as follows:1

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Settlement
Agreement.

2

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1.

In 2013, prior to the commencement of MtGox’s Japanese bankruptcy

proceedings and this Chapter 15 case, the United States government, acting through the UnitedStates Secret Service and the United States Homeland Security Investigations arm of the
Department of Homeland Security, seized a total amount of $5,142,402.20 (the “Seized Funds”)
from bank accounts of a MtGox affiliate located in the United States. The seizures were
prompted by the United States government’s assertion that MtGox, through an affiliate, operated
an unlicensed money transmitting business in the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1960.
The United States government’s assertion was supported by multiple affidavits that led a U.S.
Magistrate Judge to find that probable cause existed to believe that the MtGox affiliate, which
processed funds relating to MtGox’s U.S. customers to and from the bitcoin exchange through an
online payment processor in the U.S., violated the statute during the course of MtGox’s U.S.
bitcoin operations.
2.

As previously stated at status conferences before this Court, the Foreign

Representative has been involved in extensive negotiations with the Government to resolve theissues related to the Seized Funds. As a result of these negotiations, the Government andForeign Representative, on behalf of the Debtor, have agreed to transfer the Released Funds,
representing 50% of the Seized Funds, to the Foreign Representative pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement.
3.

For the following reasons, the Foreign Representative respectfully submits thisCourt should approve the Settlement Agreement and authorize the Released Funds to betransferred to the Foreign Representative and repatriated to Japan for distribution in the Japan
Bankruptcy, which has been recognized as a foreign main proceeding by this Court.

34.

First, the transfer of the Released Funds to the Foreign Representative is a soundbusiness decision because the Settlement Agreement was the result of an extensive, arm’s-length
settlement process, the Settlement Agreement avoids the significant risks and expenses of
litigation with the U.S. government, and the Released Funds will subsequently be used for
distribution in MtGox’s recognized Japan Bankruptcy in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act ofJapan.
5.

Second, the repatriation of the Released Funds to Japan is warranted because theinterests of United States creditors are sufficiently protected in Japan, where the Japan
Bankruptcy (i.e., the foreign main proceeding) is being administered and where all creditor
claims are already being adjudicated.
6.

Third, repatriation of the Released Funds is justified as a matter of public policy.

The public policy objectives of Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code are advanced by therepatriation of the Released Funds here because repatriation will materially aid the Foreign
Representative’s efforts to maximize recoveries for, and provide for an equitable distribution ofvalue among, all creditors. Furthermore, repatriation will assist the Foreign Representative inproviding creditor distributions in an economically efficient manner.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
7.

This Court has jurisdiction to consider this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157

and 1334. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(P).
8.

Venue for this proceeding is proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1409 and 1410.

4

9.

The statutory and legal predicates for the relief requested herein are Bankruptcy

Code Sections 363, 1520(a), and 1521(b), and this Court’s Order Recognizing Foreign Main
Proceeding and Granting Related Relief [Docket No. 151] (the “Recognition Order”).
BACKGROUND
10.

In May and June of 2013, the U.S. Government, acting through either the U.S.

Secret Service or the U.S. Homeland Security Investigations arm of the Department ofHomeland Security, executed two (2) seizures against a MtGox affiliate’s U.S. bank accounts
based on seizure warrants signed by a United States Magistrate Judge in the United States
District Court for the District Of Maryland (the “Maryland Court”).2 The total amount of U.S.
Currency seized pursuant to the three seizure warrants described above is $5,142,402.20, whichconstitutes the Seized Funds. The Government currently holds the Seized Funds in the District ofMaryland.
11.

The seizures were precipitated and supported by affidavits from Special Agentswith the United States Secret Service and Homeland Security Investigations.3 According to theaffiants, there was probable cause to believe that the contents of bank accounts in the name of
Mutum Sigillum LLC (“Mutum”), an affiliate of MtGox, were involved in transactions andattempted transactions in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1960 and that Mutum was engaged in the“unlicensed money transmitting business” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1960 since December of
2011. As a result, the contents of the bank accounts were subject to seizure under 18 U.S.C. §2

Additionally, under a third seizure warrant, the U.S. Secret Service seized a check in the amount of $109,479.84
drawn from a Wells Fargo Bank N.A. account in the name of MtGox North America, Inc., a MtGox subsidiary.
Those funds are included in the total amount of Seized Funds that are addressed in the Settlement Agreement.

3

The affidavits of Special Agents Shaun Bridges and Michael T. McFarland and the resultant seizure warrants
are attached hereto as Exhibit C and D, respectively.

5981. 4 On the basis of the affidavits, a United States Magistrate Judge for the District ofMaryland found probable cause that the bank accounts were subject to seizure under 18 U.S.C. §981 and signed warrants to effectuate the seizures.5
12.

Mutum was used for the processing of funds relating to MtGox’s U.S. customers

to and from the bitcoin exchange through an online payment processor, Dwolla, which was
located in Iowa. In order to facilitate trades on the MtGox exchange, Mutum funded its Dwolla
account from its Wells Fargo account. Additionally, MtGox would transfer, by international
wire transfer, funds from Sumitomo Mitsui Bank in Japan in the name of Mt. Gox Company Ltd.
for the benefit of the Mutum Wells Fargo account. After the funds were credited to the Mutum
Wells Fargo account, they were frequently disbursed to the Dwolla account to purchase bitcoins
which would then be registered on MtGox’s bitcoin registry.6

4

Money transmitting businesses are required by 31 U.S.C. § 5330 to register as such with the U.S. Department ofTreasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCen”). A violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1960 occurs when aperson or entity “conducts, controls, manages, supervises, directs, or owns all or part of an unlicensed moneytransmitting business” 18 U.S.C. §1960(a), with the term “‘unlicensed money transmitting business’ mean[ing]a money transmitting business which . . . (B) fails to comply with the money transmitting business registration
requirements under section 5330 of United States Code, or regulations prescribed under such section . . . .” 18
U.S.C. §1960(b)(1)(B). On March 18, 2013 FinCen issued guidance on the application of FinCen’s regulations
to bitcoin operations, stating that an administrator or exchanger of virtual currencies is a money transmitter
under FinCen’s regulations and must register. See FIN-2013-G001, “Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to
Persons Administering, Exchanging, or Using Virtual Currencies,” March 18, 2013. 18 U.S.C. § 981 provides
that any personal property involved in a transaction or attempted transaction in violation or 18 U.S.C. § 1960 issubject to forfeiture to the U.S. See 18 U.S.C. § 981.

5

In the interests of disclosure, the Foreign Representative notes that in March 2015, Special Agent Shaun W.
Bridges of the U.S. Secret Service and one of the affiants with respect to the seizures, was charged with wire
fraud, money laundering and related offenses committed during the U.S. Secret Service’s investigation of Silk
Road. The Silk Road marketplace was an underground black market that allowed vendors and buyers to conduct
illegal transactions over the internet. However, during negotiations with the Foreign Representative over the
Settlement Agreement, the Government strongly took the position that Mr. Bridges’ arrest did not affectliability on the criminal acts alleged or the Government’s ability to prosecute the actions, including by
establishing predicate facts through other witnesses and evidence if necessary.

6

Although Mutum was used for the processing of funds in connection with the operation of the MtGox exchange,
Mutum is a company wholly owned by Robert Marie Mark Karpeles. As the Court is aware, Mr. Karpeles isthe founder of MtGox and its former sole director, but no longer has any control over MtGox.

6

13.

On February 28, 2014, the Debtor filed a petition (“Japan Petition”) for thecommencement of a civil rehabilitation proceeding (the “Japan Civil Rehabilitation”) in theTokyo Court pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Japanese Corporate Reorganization Act.
14.

On March 9, 2014, the Debtor filed the Verified Petition for Recognition andChapter 15 Relief [Docket No. 2] in this Court seeking, inter alia, recognition of the Japan Civil
Rehabilitation as a foreign main proceeding under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code.
15.

By orders entered on April 16, 2014, the Tokyo Court placed the Debtor in aprovisional administration by dismissing the Japan Petition and appointing Mr. Kobayashi as the
Debtor’s provisional administrator pending the commencement of a bankruptcy proceedingunder the Bankruptcy Act of Japan (the “Bankruptcy Act”). On April 24, 2014, the Tokyo Court
entered an order (the “Bankruptcy Order”) formally commencing the Debtor’s Japan Bankruptcy
and appointing Mr. Kobayashi as the Debtor’s bankruptcy trustee.
16.

On May 23, 2014, the Foreign Representative filed his Amended Verified Petition

for Recognition and Chapter 15 Relief (the “Amended Recognition Petition”) [Docket No. 126]
requesting, inter alia, that the Japan Bankruptcy be recognized as a foreign main proceeding.
17.

On June 18, 2014, this Court entered the Recognition Order, recognizing theJapan Bankruptcy as a foreign main proceeding under Bankruptcy Code Sections 1517(a) and1517(b)(1). By the Recognition Order, the Court also granted certain other relief, including:(i) recognizing the Foreign Representative as the foreign representative of the Debtor; and(ii) ordering that the Foreign Representative is entitled to the full protections and rights
enumerated under section 1521(a)(4) and 1521(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, including, interalia, entrusting the Foreign Representative with the administration and realization of all of the
Debtor’s assets within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

7

18.

In 2014, subsequent to the seizures of the Seized Funds and the appointment of

the Foreign Representative as the bankruptcy trustee for MtGox in the Japan Bankruptcy,
counsel for the Foreign Representative, on behalf of the Debtor, contacted the Government tocommence discussions and negotiations in an effort to obtain the return of the Seized Funds andtheir repatriation to Japan for use in distributions in the Japan Bankruptcy.
19.

While the Debtor has a right to a trial if the Government filed a forfeiture casewith respect to the Seized Funds, the Foreign Representative sought to avert a trial and its
incumbent risks, delays and expenses by reaching a fair and expedited resolution to the matter.
One unique and substantial hurdle the Debtor faces in litigating a forfeiture case against theGovernment is overcoming the burden placed on a private litigant in wresting property seizedunder the forfeiture statute from the U.S. government, which acquires title to the property as ofthe date of the alleged wrongdoing. See infra ¶ 28. The Debtor thus faces losing all of the
Seized Funds to the U.S. government if it chooses to litigate.
20.

The Foreign Representative, through his U.S. counsel, and the Government

engaged in extensive, arms’ length negotiations on the matter, and ultimately reached agreementon the terms set forth in the Settlement Agreement.7
THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
21.

Following lengthy negotiations between the parties, in February 2017, the Foreign

Representative and the Government agreed to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, which
releases one-half of the Seized Funds to the Foreign Representative and alleviates the risk andexpense of engaging in civil litigation with the Government parties.
7

The Foreign Representative notes that the resolution embodied in the Settlement Agreement was agreed to in
February 2016, approximately one year ago. However, the Settlement Agreement required formal approval by
personnel with the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. That approval was not given until the end ofJanuary 2017, which the DOJ’s representatives informed Brown Rudnick is not atypical.

8

22.

23.

A summary of the key terms of the Settlement Agreement is as follows:8i.

The Government agrees to release a total of $2,571,201.10, of the SeizedFunds, representing fifty percent (50%) of the Seized Funds (the“Released Funds”), to the Foreign Representative, on behalf of the Debtor.

ii.

The Foreign Representative, on behalf of MtGox, agrees to withdraw its
claims as to the remaining Seized Funds, and agrees to forfeit all rights,
title, and interest in that portion of the Seized Funds to the Government.

iii.

MtGox agrees to indemnify and hold the Government harmless from andagainst all claims, damages, losses, and actions resulting from or arisingout of the release of the Released Funds to MtGox, provided, however,that MtGox’s obligation to the Government under the indemnity provision,
if any, shall not exceed the amount of the Released Funds.

iv.

The Settlement Agreement shall only be effective upon (i) the entry of anorder by the Chapter 15 Court or any other court of competent jurisdiction(a) approving the Settlement Agreement; (b) approving the transfer of theReleased Funds to the Foreign Representative pursuant to Sections 363
and 1520(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code; (c) approving the repatriation of
the Released Funds to Japan for use in the Japan Bankruptcy pursuant to
Section 1521(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; and/or (d) any other and further
relief necessary to effectuate this Agreement; and (ii) the entry of an orderby the Tokyo Court approving the Settlement Agreement and granting anyother and further relief necessary to effectuate the Agreement.

On February 2, 2017, the Tokyo Court approved the Settlement Agreement. A

copy of the Tokyo Court’s approval order is attached hereto as Exhibit E, and a copy of theTokyo Court’s approval order translated into English is attached hereto as Exhibit F.
RELIEF REQUESTED
24.

By this Motion, the Foreign Representative seeks the entry of an Order,

substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit H, (i) approving the Settlement Agreement
pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 363 and 1520(a)(2) insofar as it provides for the transfer
of an interest of the Debtor in property in the United States; (ii) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code8

The summary of the Settlement Agreement set forth herein is provided solely for the convenience of the Court,
and is not intended to be a comprehensive recitation of the terms of the Settlement Agreement. To the extent
that there is any inconsistency between the summary and the actual terms of the Settlement Agreement, theactual terms of the Settlement Agreement control.

9Sections 363 and 1520(a)(2), approving the transfer of Released Funds to the Foreign
Representative and the forfeiture of the Forfeited Funds to the Government in accordance with
the Settlement Agreement; and (iii) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 1521(b), approving
the repatriation of the Released Funds to Japan for distribution in the Japan Bankruptcy.
BASIS FOR RELIEF REQUESTED
I.

Transfer of the Released Funds to the Foreign Representative
Should be Approved under Bankruptcy Code Section 1520(a) and 363(b).
25.

Section 1520(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, provides that “[u]pon recognition of aforeign proceeding that is a foreign main proceeding—(2) sections 363, 549, and 552 apply to atransfer of an interest of the debtor in property that is within the territorial jurisdiction of theUnited States to the same extent that the sections would apply to property of an estate . . . .” 11
U.S.C. § 1520(a)(2). The Foreign Representative respectfully submits that the transfer of theReleased Funds to the Foreign Representative and agreement to forfeit the Forfeited Funds to theGovernment should be approved as an exercise of the Foreign Representative’s sound businessjudgment under Bankruptcy Code Sections 1520(a)(2) and 363(b).
26.

While the Fifth Circuit has not directly addressed the issue, other Courts haveheld that Bankruptcy Code Section 1520(a)(2) requires bankruptcy courts to review transactions
that are outside the ordinary course in Chapter 15 cases in the same manner as they would in a
Chapter 11 case. See In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd., 768 F.3d 239, 246 (2d Cir. 2014) (“Thelanguage of section 1520(a)(2) is plain; the bankruptcy court is required to conduct a section 363
review when the debtor seeks a transfer of an interest in property within the territorial
jurisdiction of the United States.”); In re Elpida Memory, Inc., 2012 WL 6090194 at *1 (Bankr.
D. Del. Nov. 20, 2012) (stating that courts should review transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code
Section 1520(a)(2) under the same legal standards that it would review a “transfer by a trustee

10

outside the ordinary course of business, i.e., is the transaction a sound exercise of the trustee’sbusiness judgment”).
27.

In the Fifth Circuit, courts determine whether to authorize the use, sale, or lease ofproperty of the estate under Bankruptcy Code Section 363(b) by requiring the debtor to showthat a sound business purpose justifies such actions. See In re ASARCO, L.L.C., 650 F.3d 593,
601 (5th Cir. 2011) (“‘[F]or the debtor-in-possession or trustee to satisfy its fiduciary duty to thedebtor, creditors and equity holders, there must be some articulated business justification forusing, selling, or leasing the property outside the ordinary course of business.’”) (quoting In reCont’l Air Lines, Inc., 780 F.2d 1223, 1226 (5th Cir. 1986)); In re Moore, 608 F.3d 253, 263 (5thCir. 2010) (“A sale of assets under § 363 . . . is subject to court approval and must be supported
by an articulated business justification, good business judgment, or sound business reasons.”).
Furthermore, “[u]nless the manner in which an estate representative arrives at a decision isseriously flawed, the court will defer to the estate representative.” In re Broughton Ltd. P’ship,
474 B.R. 206, 218 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2012) (citing In re Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 403 B.R. 413,
427 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2009) (“The court must ensure the decision-making process used by a
debtor in possession in exercising its powers under the Code is a sensible one.”).
28.

The Foreign Representative has determined in his business judgment that the

Settlement Agreement is justified and in the best interests of MtGox creditors. To be sure, theForeign Representative would contest the alleged crimes in any litigation against theGovernment. However, the risks of litigating against the U.S. government for the full amount of
the Seized Funds, for whom litigation costs and temporal delay are no issue, are great andpresent a serious chance of the Debtor recovering none of the Seized Funds. Those risks areespecially pronounced here, where it would be the Debtor’s burden to wrest title away from the11

U.S. government in the litigation.9 Specifically, the federal forfeiture statute provides that “[a]llright, title, and interest in property [subject to forfeiture] shall vest in the United States upon
commission of the act giving rise to forfeiture under this section.” 18 U.S.C. § 981(f). The
statute further provides that “[p]roperty taken or detained under this section shall not be
repleviable, but shall be deemed to be in the custody of the Attorney General . . . , subject only tothe orders and decrees of the court or official having jurisdiction thereof.” 18 U.S.C. § 981(c).
These risks only compound the underlying risk in any litigation—that the Foreign Representative
may lose, after incurring significant costs in that litigation.
29.

Here, the Foreign Representative submits that transfers provided under the

Settlement Agreement amply meet the Fifth Circuit’s business judgment standard.

Thenegotiation process between the Foreign Representative and the Government was extensive andthe Foreign Representative believes the Settlement Agreement represents the best deal possible
under the circumstances. See Kobayashi Decl. ¶¶ 11-14. The transfer of the Released Funds
from the Government to the Foreign Representative is the result of an arm’s-length negotiation
process, avoids the unnecessary risks, delays and expenses related to potential litigation over theunderlying seizures, and benefits all of MtGox’s creditors because the Released Funds, upontransfer to the Foreign Representative, will be available for distribution in the Japan Bankruptcy.
See id.10

9

To overcome this burden, MtGox would need to prevail at trial on the predicate offense of operating as an
unlicensed money transmitting business.

10 The Foreign Representative notes that MtGox is required to indemnify the Government against claims resulting
from or arising out of the release of the Released Funds to MtGox. This was a condition that the Government
insisted upon through the negotiations of the Settlement Agreement. However, the Government agreed to limit
MtGox’s indemnification obligations, if any, to the amount of Released Funds. Moreover, the risk of theindemnification obligation being triggered is very low, taking into account, among other things, that no U.S.
creditor has an interest in the Seized Funds. See Kobayashi Decl. ¶ 13, n.6.

12

30.

To the extent the Court considers it appropriate to review the matter as asettlement pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9019, that standard has been met.11 Bankruptcy courts“should approve a settlement only when the settlement is fair and equitable and in the bestinterest of the estate.” Matter of Foster Mortg. Corp., 68 F.3d 914, 917 (5th Cir. 1995) (citing
Jackson Brewing Co., 624 F.2d 599, 602 (5th Cir. 1980). Central to the analysis is a balance of
the “terms of the compromise with the likely rewards of litigation.” Id. (internal quotations
omitted). The Fifth Circuit applies a three-part test when considering compromise settlements:(1) the probability of success in the litigation, with due
consideration for the uncertainty in fact and law,(2) the complexity and likely duration of the litigation and any
attendant expense, inconvenience and delay, and(3) all other factors bearing on the wisdom of the compromise.
Id. (quoting Jackson Brewing, 624 F.2d at 609).
31.

As discussed above, each factor considered by courts in the Fifth Circuit weighsin favor of authorizing the Settlement Agreement.

For the first factor, the Foreign

Representative stands across the table from the U.S. federal government, which is in possessionof the Seized Funds, has developed evidence in support of multiple search and seizure warrants,
and persuaded a U.S. Magistrate Judge to find probable cause that MtGox, through an affiliate,
was operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. The second factor has already beenaddressed, but it bears repeating that the Foreign Representative must, in litigation, weather thefull resources of the U.S. federal government, for whom a lengthy litigation poses no downside.
Finally, the Settlement Agreement represents a near-term return of significant assets to the Japan
11 The Foreign Representative notes that there is uncertainty whether Bankruptcy Rule 9019 applies in Chapter 15
cases. See In re Ace Track Co., Ltd., 556 B.R. 887, 909 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2016) (applying Bankruptcy Rule9019 to a settlement in a Chapter 15 case but recognizing that “[a]n argument certainly could be raised that Rule9019 should not apply . . . [a]s in chapter 9 cases, there is no bankruptcy estate.”) (citing In re City of Stockton,
Cal., 486 B.R. 194, 195-98 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2013)).

13

Bankruptcy for future distribution in that proceeding (the “main” bankruptcy proceeding), whileeliminating the risk of returning empty handed. The Foreign Representative submits that undereither the Bankruptcy Code Section 363 standard or the Bankruptcy Rule 9019 standard, theSettlement Agreement and the transfers thereunder should be approved.
II.

Repatriation of the Released Funds isAppropriate under Bankruptcy Code Section 1521(b).
32.

The repatriation of the Released Funds to Japan for distribution in the Japan

Bankruptcy is permitted by the Bankruptcy Code and the Court should authorize and entrust theReleased Funds to the Foreign Representative for their repatriation pursuant to Bankruptcy Code
Section 1521(b). Section 1521(b) of the Bankruptcy Code authorizes the Court, in its discretion,
to “entrust the distribution of all or part of the debtor’s assets located in the United States to theforeign representative . . . , provided that the court is satisfied that the interests of creditors in the
United States are sufficiently protected.” 11 U.S.C. § 1521(b); see also 11 U.S.C. § 1522(a)(“The court may grant relief under section . . . 1521, . . . only if the interests of the creditors andother interested entities, including the debtor, are sufficiently protected.”).
33.

Bankruptcy Code Sections 1521(b) and 1522 work in conjunction to “achieve anappropriate balance between the interests of creditors and other interested entities, including the
debtor.” In re Vitro S.A.B. de C.V., 473 B.R. 117, 121 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2012); see In re Int’lBanking Corp. B.S.C., 439 B.R. 614, 626 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010) (“The idea underlying[Bankruptcy Code Section 1522] is that there should be a balance between relief that may be
granted to the foreign representative and the interests of the persons that may be affected by such
relief.”). Concerns over whether interested entities are sufficiently protected center aroundwhether the relief sought “unduly favor[s] one group of creditors over another” or whether therelief falls afoul of the public policy exception embodied in Bankruptcy Code Section 1506. In

14

re Tri-Cont’l Exch. Ltd., 349 B.R. 627, 637-38 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2006); see In re Vitro S.A.B. de
C.V., 473 B.R. at 123 (describing the Bankruptcy Code Section 1506 public policy exception asa safety valve for creditors in Chapter 15 proceedings).
34.

Courts have entrusted the distribution of assets to foreign representatives pursuant

to Bankruptcy Code Section 1521(b) in situations where the turnover of assets “would be more
economical and efficient in that it would permit all of [the company’s] creditors worldwide topursue their rights and remedies in one court of competent jurisdiction.” In re Atlas Shipping
A/S, 404 B.R. 726, 742 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009). The Atlas court found that creditors’ ability toassert their rights to the transferred funds in the foreign court, without prejudice, was sufficient
protection for creditors under Section 1521(b). See id. Here, the Japan Bankruptcy is a foreign
main proceeding, and is the singular forum in which all creditors (including all U.S. and foreign
creditors) are already seeking to satisfy their claims. See Kobayashi Decl. ¶¶ 14-18.12
35.

By this Motion, the Foreign Representative is merely seeking to repatriate theReleased Funds to Japan to be used in the administration of the Japan Bankruptcy, including
providing distributions to all creditors. U.S. creditors and other interest holders will not be
prejudiced by asserting their claims in the Japan Bankruptcy because all creditors, regardless ofgeographical or jurisdictional location, must utilize the same process in the same manner as allother creditors. See id. Therefore, the Debtor’s U.S. creditors, like the creditors in Atlas, aresufficiently protected under 11 U.S.C. §§ 1521(b) and 1522 because U.S. creditors may assert
their rights to the transferred funds, without prejudice, in the same forum as all other creditors.
Importantly, no U.S. or other creditors have a property interest in the Seized Funds. All MtGox

12 For a summary of the status of the filing of bankruptcy claims as of September 28, 2016, see Trustee’s Report,
MtGox Co., Ltd [Tokyo District Court] September 28, 2016, (fu) no. 3830, available at www.mtgox.com andattached hereto as Exhibit G.

15customers, including those in the U.S., have the status of unsecured creditors and are being
treated as such in the Japan Bankruptcy. See Kobayashi Decl. ¶ 14.
36.

Moreover, there is no issue of public policy that justifies a contrary result.

Indeed, permitting the Foreign Representative to repatriate the Released Funds for use in theJapan Bankruptcy would advance the express objectives of Chapter 15 set forth in Bankruptcy
Code Section 1501, including:(i) the “fair and efficient administration of cross-borderinsolvencies that protects the interests of all creditors and other interested entities, including the[D]ebtor,” 11 U.S.C. §1501(a)(3); and (ii) the “protection and maximization of the value of the[D]ebtor’s assets.” 11 U.S.C. § 1501(a)(4). Here, repatriation of the funds will, inter alia,
increase the value of the Debtor’s estate in the Japan Bankruptcy, and subsequently result inincreased distributions to all creditors in the Japan Bankruptcy. Thus, permitting the Foreign
Representative to repatriate the Released Funds will materially aid the Foreign Representative’s
efforts to maximize recoveries for, and provide for an equitable distribution of value among, allcreditors.

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

16

CONCLUSION37.

For all of the foregoing reasons, the Foreign Representative respectfully requests

that the Court enter an order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit H, (i)approving the Settlement Agreement pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 363 and 1520(a)(2)insofar as it provides for the transfer of an interest of the Debtor in property in the United States;(ii) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 363 and 1520(a)(2), approving the transfer of
Released Funds to the Foreign Representative and the forfeiture of the Forfeited Funds to theGovernment in accordance with the Settlement Agreement; and (iii) pursuant to Bankruptcy
Code Section 1521(b), approving the repatriation of the Released Funds to Japan for distribution
in the Japan Bankruptcy.
Dated:

February 28, 2017
Dallas, Texas

Respectfully submitted,
GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP/s/ Thomas C. Scannell
Marcus A. Helt (TX 24052187)
Thomas Scannell (TX 24070559)
Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: (214) 999-3000
Facsimile: (214) 999-4667
Email: mhelt@gardere.com
Email: tscannell@gardere.com- and BROWN RUDNICK LLPDavid J. Molton (admitted pro hac vice)
Daniel J. Saval (admitted pro hac vice)
Seven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: (212) 209-4800
Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
Email: dmolton@brownrudnick.com
Email: dsaval@brownrudnick.com

17

Counsel for Nobuaki Kobayashi, in his capacity
as the Trustee and Foreign Representativeof MtGox Co., Ltd., a/k/a MtGox KK
62713666 v1

18

Exhibit AExhibit BExhibit CExhibit DExhibit EExhibit F[Translation]

I hereby certify that the application hereunder was approved on February 1st,2017.
February 1st, 2017
Daihachiro Asaka, Court Clerk, the 20th Civil Division, Tokyo District Court

SEAL

2014 (fu) No. 3830
February 1st, 2017
To: The 20th Civil Division, Tokyo District Court

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Bankrupt Entity

MtGox Co., Ltd.

Bankruptcy Trustee

SEAL
Nobuaki Kobayashi, Attorney at law

PURPOSE OF APPLICATIONI hereby seek the approval by the court of the execution of the attached
Settlement Agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) with the following
terms and conditions (such settlement agreement, the “Settlement Agreement”):(1)

DOJ agrees to release a total of US$ 2,571,201.10 (the “Released Funds”) out of
US$ 5,142,402.20, in aggregate, of the deposited funds seized by the U.S.
Government (the “Seized Funds”) within five business days of the satisfactionof the conditions set forth in (2) below into the bank account to be designated1

by the Bankruptcy Trustee, the breakdown of which is shown as follows:(a)

US$ 2,117,414.96 out of the Seized Funds held under USSS case no.

101-777-40003-J and seizure number 101-2013-004;(b)

US$ 109,479.84 out of the Seized Funds held under USSS case no.

101-777-4003-J and seizure number 101-2013-006; and(c)

US$ 344,306,30 out of the Seized Funds held under CBP case no.

2013-1303-001294-01;(2)

The Settlement Agreement shall become effective upon satisfaction of theconditions in (a) and (b) below:(a)the entry of an order by the Chapter 15 court or any other court ofcompetent jurisdiction ordering:(i)approval of the Settlement Agreement;(ii)

approval of the transfer of the Released Funds to the Bankruptcy

Trustee pursuant to Sections 363 and 1520(a)(2) of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code;(iii) approval of the repatriation of the Released Funds to Japan for use in
the Japan Bankruptcy Proceeding pursuant to Section 1521(b) of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code;(iv)

any other and further release necessary to effectuate the Settlement

Agreement; and(b) the entry of an order by the Tokyo District Court approving the Settlement
Agreement and granting any other and further relief necessary to effectuate
the Settlement Agreement;(3)

Bankruptcy Trustee agrees to withdraw the claims as to the remaining Seized2

Assets, and agrees to forfeit all rights and interest in that portion of the SeizedFunds to the Government (the “Forfeited Funds”);(4)

DOJ and Bankruptcy Trustee agree that, if necessary, DOJ may submit a copy of
the Settlement Agreement to the Maryland Court in support of a legal action toseek judicial forfeiture of the Forfeited Funds.

DOJ acknowledges that theapproval of the Maryland Court is not required for the transfer of the Released
Funds; and(5)Bankrupt Entity agrees to indemnify and hold DOJ harmless from and against
any and all damages arising out of the release of the Released Funds; provided
however, that the amount to be indemnified or held harmless shall not exceed
the amount of the Released Funds.

Each party shall bear its own costs andexpenses including attorney’s fees in connection with the negotiation,
documentation and seeking of any approval of the Settlement Agreement.

Grounds for Application
1

Summary of BackgroundThe deposited amount of US$ 5,142,402.20 in the U.S. bank account held in
the name of Mutum Sigillum LLC, an affiliate of Bankrupt Entity, was seized by the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security in May 2013.
Since the seized funds above actually belonged to Bankrupt Entity, if the said
funds were to be released by the U.S. government, they would constitute a part ofthe bankrupt estate.

Therefore, Bankruptcy Trustee has continued negotiating with

DOJ, who is in charge of the release of the seized funds.

Now, Bankruptcy Trustee

and DOJ have reached an agreement on the terms and conditions of the release of3the Seized Funds.

2

Necessity and AppropriatenessSince the Seized Funds actually belong to Bankrupt Entity, as long as these are
the funds to be released by the U.S. government, Bankruptcy Trustee owes anobligation to collect and add them to the bankrupt estate promptly.

Without the

Settlement Agreement, Bankruptcy Trustee would have to seek other remedies,including filing a motion to release the Seized Funds from DOJ and seeking a
discovery order against the U.S. government or making an indemnity claim against
prosecutors of DOJ and the U.S. government for the damages incurred by Bankrupt
Entity.

However, taking into consideration the time and costs necessary for theother remedies and the likelihood of success in collection of the Seized Funds, aswell as the advice by Brown Rudnick LLP, the U.S. counsel to Bankruptcy Trustee, aslong as the terms and conditions of settlement with DOJ are reasonable, it ispreferable to collect the Seized Funds from DOJ in a prompt manner through thesettlement, and the execution of the Settlement Agreement is needed for that
purpose.
Further, according to Brown Rudnick LLP, Bankruptcy Trustee understands that
the U.S. government has broad discretion as to forfeiture under U.S. law, and as longas the requirements are met, the U.S. government is allowed to forfeit the funds, nomatter what the purpose of forfeiture is.

Given the advice by Brown Rudnick LLP

and DOJ’s attitude in the negotiation so far, it would be difficult to gain further
compromise from DOJ, and taking into account the time, costs and expected successof the other remedies as discussed above, it is hard to expect that Bankruptcy

4

Trustee will collect more than the amount agreed in the Settlement Agreement.
Further, the amount of US$ 2,571,201.10 (approximately JPY 291,628,199) would besignificant income to the bankrupt estate.
Given the above, it is necessary and appropriate to sign the Settlement
Agreement.
Now, therefore, I hereby apply for the approval.

ATTACHMENT
1

A copy of the Settlement Agreement

1 copyEnd

5

Exhibit Gその後、当職は、上記の認めなかった金額のうち、19名34,884,662円につき異議を撤回し、認めるに至っている。
さらに、現在までに査定申立てが137件（査定申立額2,220,868,159円（元本のみ））なされている（但し、不適法なものを含む。）。
当職は、これらの査定申立書類を検討中であり、適宜答弁書を提出する方向で考えている。

２

取引所関係破産債権以外の債権届出の状況
取引所関係破産債権以外の債権を届け出た債権者に対しては、平成 27 年 9 月 9 日の債権調査期日において認否をしているが、うち 2 名から破産債権査定の申立てがあり、
現在査定手続中である。

第３

BTC 消失経緯等調査
当職は、破産者における BTC 及び法定通貨の消失の有無・経緯等に関し、有限責任監査法人トーマツ（関連法人を含む。）、及び税理士法人レクス会計事務所に委嘱し、かつ支援企業である Payward グループの協力も得ながら、調査を進めている。
また、カルプレス・マルク・マリ・ロベートは、後述のとおり、逮捕起訴されたが、当職は、警視庁などの捜査機関の捜査協力要請に対し、可能な協力を行ってきており、今後とも協力を行っていく方針である。なお、かかる警察捜査との関係でも、捜査又は調査に関する情報については、慎重に取り扱う必要が生じている。
存在する情報が限られていること等の事情もあり、全容の把握は難しいと考えているものの、今後も、可能な限りで、調査を続行する予定である。なお、上記調査の結果については、プライバシーの問題等について配慮した上で、適切な時期、方法及び内容にて公表することを予定している。

第４

関連会社
破産者には、複数の関連会社（親会社等）が存し、以下の会社等に対する貸付金等を有するため、その回収に努めている。

１(株)TIBANNE
当職は、平成27年5月15日、破産者の親会社である(株)TIBANNE の破産手続（東京地方裁判所平成27年(ﾌ)第585号）において、破産債権の届出（届出破産債権額合計
25,841,657,102円。なお、平成27年11月19日に306,362,100円を取り下げている。）をしたが、破産管財人粟田口太郎弁護士より異議を述べられたため、平成27年10月13日、破産債権査定の申立てを行った。現在、(株)TIBANNE の破産手続において査定手続中で
ある。

2

２

(株)Bitcoin. Café
当職が（株）Bitcoin. Café の破産手続（東京地方裁判所平成26年(ﾌ)第5603号）において行った破産債権の届出（届出金額60,710,136円）について（株）Bitcoin. Caféの債権者である東急建設株式会社が述べた異議に関し、東京高等裁判所において、同社を控訴人、当職を被控訴人とする破産債権査定異議請求控訴事件（東京高等裁判所
平成28年（ﾈ）第1479号）が係属していたところ、平成28年7月13日、控訴を棄却する
旨の控訴審判決がなされ、当職による上記届出を認めることを内容とする第一審判決が維持された。但し、東急建設株式会社は、同月26日、上記控訴審判決を不服として、上告及び上告受理申立てを行っている。

３

カルプレス・マルク・マリ・ロベート
当職は、平成27年10月23日、御庁に対し、破産者の代表取締役であるカルプレス・

マルク・マリ・ロベートの破産手続開始の申立てを行った。その結果、同年11月10日、同人について破産手続開始決定がなされ、破産管財人に坂口昌子弁護士が選任された。
また、カルプレス・マルク・マリ・ロベートは、平成27年9月11日に私電磁的記録不正作出・同供用罪及び業務上横領罪の容疑で起訴され、さらに同年11月18日に同じく
私電磁的記録不正作出・同供用罪及び業務上横領罪の容疑で追起訴されている。なお、
同人は、平成28年7月14日に保釈された。

第５

破産法第 177 条第 1 項の規定による保全処分又は第 178 条第 1 項に規定する役

員責任査定決定を必要とする事情の有無
破産法第 177 条第 1 項の規定による保全処分又は第 178 条第 1 項に規定する役員責
任査定決定を必要とする事情の有無については、上記第 3 の調査と並行し引き続き調査をしている。

第６１

破産手続進行に関する事項
配当の見込み等
全ての破産債権につき認否を終えたため、今後、可能な限り早期に配当手続に進みたいと考えている。しかし、その具体的日程については、当職の認否に対する各債権者の応答等によって影響を受けざるを得ない。したがって、現時点では、配当見込み、
配当時期、及び配当方法等は未定である。
なお、破産配当が可能となる場合に BTC を配布する方法を用いるか否かについては、
引き続き検討中である。

２

その他必要な情報のウェブサイトでの提供
本件では、極めて多数の債権者が各国に存するため、本件に関し債権者に必要な情報等は、できる限り、当職の管理するウェブサイト（https://www.mtgox.com/）に随

3

時公表する予定である。
以 上4

平成２６年（フ）第３８３０号
破産者 株式会社ＭＴＧＯＸ
破産管財人 弁護士 小林 信明

財

産

目

録
（開始決定日：平成26年4月24日現在）

資産の部（単位：円）

番号 科目
1

簿 価

現金及び預金

評価額（財団組入額）

1,336,251

現金

152,602 解約入金済み。

みずほ銀行 渋谷支店 普通預金 No.1497669

047 解約入金済み。

みずほ銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.9110151

04 通貨：USD、解約入金済み。

みずほ銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.9110186

05 通貨：GBP、解約入金済み。

みずほ銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.9110216

097 通貨：AUD、解約入金済み。

みずほ銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.911026704 通貨：NZD、解約入金済み。

みずほ銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.9110232

91

87 通貨：DKK、解約入金済み。

みずほ銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.9110275

28

26 通貨：HKD、解約入金済み。

みずほ銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.9110283

25

25 通貨：SGD、解約入金済み。

みずほ銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.9110259

8987 通貨：CHF、解約入金済み。

ゆうちょ銀行 渋谷支店 総合口座 No.10170-48410711

945

945 解約入金済み。

楽天銀行 第二営業支店 普通預金 No.7018261

279,457

279,213 解約入金済み。

ジャパンネット銀行 すずめ支店 普通預金 No.2559084

596,168

596,168 解約入金済み。

7

八千代銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.0623949

141,608

136,041 通貨：EUR、解約入金済み。

八千代銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.0623938

102,476

100,677 通貨：USD、解約入金済み。

0

短期貸付金

1,307,423,210㈱TIBANNE

772,791,001㈱Shade3D

338,139,321

0 破産者の関係会社、平成27年1月30日破産手続開始決定。破産債権届出済み。
46,686,362 破産者の関係会社。平成27年9月29日、債権譲渡契約に基づき回収。

60,000,000

0 破産者の関係会社、平成26年6月18日破産手続開始決定。破産債権届出済み。

カルプレス・マルク・マリ・ロベート

136,175,781

0 破産者の代表者。平成27年11月10日破産手続開始決定。

317,107

未収入金

0 破産者の関係会社。弁済請求中。

925,826

331,600 評価は平成28年9月27日までの換価実績による。

㈱TIBANNE

562,026

渋谷税務署（法人税中間納付）242,200

243,900 平成26年7月24日還付金入金済み。

渋谷都税事務所（事業税及び地方法人特別税中間納付）80,80080,800 平成26年7月29日還付金入金済み。

渋谷都税事務所（住民税法人税割中間納付）40,800

仮払金（東京地方裁判所）

5

預け金2,000,000

0 破産者の親会社、貸付金の未収利息。

6,900 均等割りと相殺の上、平成26年7月29日還付金入金済み。
2,000,000 平成26年6月4日回収。

783,948,565

862,720,420 評価は平成28年9月27日までの換価実績による。

申立代理人

241,459,630

231,557,866 平成26年5月12日に評価額にて引継ぎ済み。

申立代理人

509,510,685

500,698,397 平成26年5月9日に評価額にて引継ぎ済み。

申立代理人

32,978,250

32,977,386 平成26年5月8日に評価額にて引継ぎ済み。

その他

0

他社預け金

1,693,444,088

CoinLab

500,000,000

その他

1,193,444,088

工具器具備品104,557,699

DELL サーバー

5,649,000

Violin Server

90,623,142

Apple Japan

ノートパソコン28台

97,486,771 平成27年1月7日回収。
706,433,012 評価は平成28年9月27日までの換価実績による。
0 訴訟継続中。
706,433,012 一部回収。残額については回収作業中または検討中。
32,582,300 評価は平成28年9月27日までの換価実績による。
32,382,300 平成26年11月27日売却、入金済み。

5,383,438Chair
8100 解約入金済み。
46,686,362 評価は平成28年9月27日までの換価実績による。

㈱Bitcoin cafe

4

793,468 通貨：AUD、解約入金済み。

八千代銀行 渋谷支店 外貨普通預金 No.0623950

MTGOX HongKong6

7 解約入金済み。

95,357

りそな銀行 渋谷支店 普通預金 No.2973992

30

120,000

八千代銀行 渋谷支店 普通預金 No.0623839

2

1,359,603

0

みずほ銀行 渋谷支店 普通預金 No.1457705

備考

2,902,119

敷金

200,000 平成27年6月8日売却、入金済み。

700,000

0 評価は平成28年9月27日までの換価実績による。

ディ・エグゼクティブ・センター・ジャパン株式会社

540,000

0 解約済み。回収不能。

ディ・エグゼクティブ・センター・ジャパン株式会社（駐車場敷金）

160,000

0 解約済み。回収不能。

9

差入保証金

10,586,875

10

開発費

85,875,146

10,587,933 破産者が供託した仮差押解放金払渡金。回収済み。
0 評価は平成28年9月27日までの換価実績による。

Applico Inc.

33,453,375

0 資産性なし

Internet Escrow Services

3,073,459

0 資産性なし

Mandalah KK

31,993,500

0 資産性なし

The Phuse Inc.

4,572,513

0 資産性なし

Winsoft Technology Solutions Inc.

12,782,299

0 資産性なし

0356,617 預金利息

11

受取利息

12

破産申立予納金0

破産申立予納金（カルプレス・マルク・マリ・ロベート）

0

3,026,000 破産申立予納金戻り（郵券等戻り含む）

0
3,990,797,660

15,037,297 破産申立予納金戻り（郵券等戻り含む）
1,681,121,144

破産申立予納金（㈱TIBANNE）
資産合計

18,063,297

負債の部
番号 科目
1

帳簿価額

財団債権・優先的破産債権（公租公課）

54,374,152

財団債権（その他経費）
219,253,642

一般破産債権（取引所関係破産債権）

8,256,092,214

一般破産債権（取引先等）

402,470,293
負債合計

8,732,190,301

届出金額

備考

額未定
額未定
263,519,268,303,371
13,119,083,453
額未定※1 「簿価」は、原則として、平成26年４月24日現在の破産者の帳簿価額を記載しており、当該金額が実際の換価額と一致するものではない。
※2 「評価額（財団組入額）」は、原則として、平成28年9月27日現在実際に回収された金額を記載している。
※3 破産者が保有するBitcoinは、上記資産には含まれていない。なお、平成28年9月21日時点において破産財団で管理するBitcoinは、202,185.35450043 BTCとなっている。
※4 本目録の記載は、現時点での調査結果に基づく内容であり、今後の調査により本目録に記載のない資産又は負債が判明する可能性がある。

収

支

計

自 平成２６年
至 平成２８年算書

４月 ２４日
９月 ２７日平成２６年（フ）第３８３０号
破産者 株式会社ＭＴＧＯＸ
破産管財人 弁護士 小林 信明（単位：円）
収

入

摘

要

番号

の

部
金額

支

出

摘

要

番号

の

部
金額

1

引継現預金

766,593,2521

事務費30,191,242

2

引継予納金

2,000,0002

破産開始決定通知書送付費用

6,890,292

3

供託金回収

10,587,933

3

消耗品費

8,840,785

4

受取利息

356,6174

専門家報酬275,530,917

5

税金還付

331,600

5

業務委託報酬

125,418,228

6

他社預け金の回収

706,433,012

6

和解金（通信関連契約解約費用）

7

破産手続の支援等に関する契約に基づくＰaywardの支援金

32,382,300

7

旅費交通費

8

預け金の回収97,486,771

8

管財人室家賃・敷金

5,260,540

9

備品売却収入200,000

9

公租公課（管財人報酬の源泉所得税等）

29,010,413

10㈱Shade3Dに対する貸付金譲渡代金

46,686,362

10

コールセンター費用

6,335,718

11

カルプレス・マルク・マリ・ロベート破
産申立予納金戻り（郵券等戻り含む）

3,026,000

11

TIBANNE破産申立予納金

15,000,000

12

TIBANNE破産申立予納金戻り（郵券等戻り含む）

15,037,297

12

管財人報酬

114,550,633

13

カルプレス・マルク・マリ・ロベート破
産申立予納金合計1,681,121,144

合6,310,433
298,930

計

3,000,000
626,638,131

差引残金

1,054,483,013

平成２６年（フ）第３８３０号
破産者 株式会社ＭＴＧＯＸ
破産管財人 弁護士 小林 信明（破産手続開始の決定日：平成26年 4月24日現在）【破産】貸借対照表（単位：円）
評価額（財団組入額）※1

科目
現

金

短

期

及

び
貸

未

収

金

1,359,603

財団債権及び優先的破産債権 ※ 3付

金46,686,362

一

金

331,600

入
払金2,000,000

預け

金

862,720,420

け

金

706,433,012

備品

32,582,300

金

0

金

10,587,933

費

0

息

356,617

金

18,063,297

社

工

具

預
器

具

敷
差

入

保

開

破
資

証

発

受

取
産

申

利
立
産

予

届出額

預

仮

他

科目

納

計 ※2

1,681,121,144

負

般

破

産

債

債

73,627,794

権

263,532,387,386,824

計

263,532,461,014,618※1 「評価額（財団組入額）」は、平成28年9月27日現在実際に回収された金額を記載している。
※2 破産者が保有するBitcoinは、上記資産には含まれていない。なお、平成28年9月21日時点において破産財団で管理する
Bitcoinは、202,185.35450043 BTCとなっている。
※3 財団債権及び優先的破産債権については、交付要求未了のため、破産手続開始決定時の破産者の帳簿に基づく金額である。
※4 本貸借対照表の記載は、現時点での調査結果に基づく内容であり、今後の調査により本貸借対照表に記載のない資産又は負債が判明する可能性がある。

[Translation]
Tokyo District Court 2014 (fu) No. 3830
Bankrupt Entity: MtGox Co., Ltd.

ReportSeptember 28, 2016
To: Tokyo District Court, Collegiate Section of 20th Civil Division
Bankrupt Entity: MtGox Co., Ltd.
Bankruptcy Trustee: Nobuaki Kobayashi, Attorney-at-law

I.

Past Events and Present Situation Concerning Bankruptcy Estate
1.

Present Situation of Bankruptcy Estate
The status of the bankruptcy estate, based on the investigation conducted up to thetime of preparation of this Report, is as shown in the List of Assets and the Balance
Sheet, and the balance in the account that I have secured as of September 27, 2016is JPY 1,054,483,013, i.e., a decrease of approximately JPY 10,200,000 from thetime of the 6th creditors’ meeting.
However, since the investigation of the status of the holdings of BTC is still on-going,such List of Assets and Balance Sheet do not contain BTC held by the bankrupt
entity.

2.

Status of Management of BTC
The amount of BTC managed by the bankruptcy estate as of September 21, 2016 is
202,185.35450043BTC. Currently, I am still investigating the existence ofadditional BTC held by the bankrupt entity, and it is planned that, as soon as such
BTC are found, I will move them to the address which I manage, and I will keepsuch BTC there.

1

II.

Status of Investigation of Bankruptcy Claims

1. Status of Filing of Bankruptcy Claims and Acceptance or Rejection ofClaimsOn May 25, 2016, the date of the investigation of claims, I completed the task ofaccepting or rejecting each of the claims against the Bankrupt Entity seeking a
refund of BTC or money that was filed by users of the Bankrupt Entity’s Bitcoin
exchange (such users, the “Users”; and such claims, the “Bankruptcy Claims
Related to Exchange”).
A summary of the status of filings of bankruptcy claims and the acceptance orrejection of claims as of May 25, 2016, is shown below.

Creditors who filed a claim
only with respect to the
Bankruptcy Claims Related
to Exchange

Numberof persons
who filedclaims24,750persons

Total amount ofclaims filed *1

JPY
263,519,268,303,371

Total amount ofclaims that havebeen accepted*1
JPY
45,609,593,503

Total amount of claims
that have been
rejected *1
JPY
263,473,658,709,868*1 All amounts have been converted into JPY.
Thereafter, out of the claims that I had rejected, I have retracted my objection
against claims by 19 creditors, the total amount of which is 34,884,662 yen, andaccepted them.
In addition, to date, 137 petitions for assessment, the total amount of which is2,220,868,159 yen (principal amount), have been filed; please note, however, thatthese figures include petitions that were improperly filed.
I am currently reviewing the documents filed in connection with these petitions,and planning to submit my written answers in due course.
2. Status of Filings of Claims Other than the Bankruptcy Claims Related to
Exchange
With respect to creditors who filed claims other than Bankruptcy Claims Related to
Exchange, these claims have been accepted or rejected at the investigation of claims
that was held on September 9, 2015; however, there was a petition for a bankruptcy

2

claim assessment from two of the creditors, and the assessment is currently under
way.
III.

Investigation of Disappearance of BTC, etc.
I am conducting investigations into whether any BTC or money in other currencies
that were possessed by or under the control of the bankrupt entity have disappeared,
and if they have, the events leading to such disappearance by delegating such work
to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC (and its affiliates) and ReEx Accounting Firm, as
well as by obtaining the assistance of our supporting company, Payward.
Additionally, while Robert Marie Mark Karpeles was arrested and prosecuted asstated below, following a request made by investigation agencies such as theMetropolitan Police Department to cooperate with their investigation, I have been
providing and will continue to provide them with cooperation as much as possible.
In connection with such police investigation, the careful treatment of information
relating to the investigation is now needed.
Due to the circumstances, such as the limited amount of information that exists, I
believe it will be difficult to understand the full picture; however, I am planning tocontinue these investigations, as much as possible. We are planning to disclose
the results of the aforesaid investigation at the appropriate time, in the appropriatemanner and with the appropriate content, taking into account concerns as to privacy,
etc.

IV.

Affiliated Companies
The bankrupt entity has several affiliated companies (parent company, etc.), and has
claims based on loan receivables, etc. against the following companies, etc.
Therefore, I am making efforts to collect such loan receivables.

1. TIBANNE Co., Ltd.
On May 15, 2015, in the bankruptcy proceedings against TIBANNE Co., Ltd.,
which is the parent company of the bankrupt entity (Tokyo District Court 2015 (fu)
No. 585), I filed a bankruptcy claim (the total amount of the bankruptcy claim thatwas filed is JPY 25,841,657,102; however, I have withdrawn a portion of that claimin the amount of JPY 306,362,100 on November 19, 2015). Mr. Taro Awataguchi,3

who is the bankruptcy trustee of TIBANNE, made an objection to the claim;
therefore, I filed a motion seeking an assessment of the bankruptcy claim on
October 13, 2015. The assessment is currently being processed under thebankruptcy proceeding of TIBANNE, Co., Ltd.
2.

K.K. Bitcoin. Café
With regard to the objection raised by TOKYU CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD., acreditor of K.K. Bitcoin. Café, against my filing of a bankruptcy claim (the amountof the bankruptcy claim is JPY 60,710,136) in the bankruptcy proceeding against
K.K. Bitcoin. Café (Tokyo District Court 2014 (fu) No. 5603), the hearing in theappeal case regarding the objection to the bankruptcy claim assessment (Tokyo
High Court 2016 (ne) No. 1479) was held before the Tokyo High Court, where
TOKYU CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD. was the appellant and I was the appellee.
The decision of the Tokyo High Court, which was entered on July 13, 2016,
generally held that the appeal was to be dismissed, and therefore, the decision by
the court of first instance approving the aforesaid bankruptcy claim that I had filed
was upheld. However, TOKYU CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD. was not satisfied
with the aforesaid decision entered by the Tokyo High Court, and filed a final
appeal as well as a petition for acceptance of final appeal on July 26, 2016.

3.

Robert Marie Mark Karpeles
I filed a petition for the commencement of bankruptcy proceeding regarding RobertMarie Mark Karpeles, who is the representative director of the bankrupt entity, withthe court on October 23, 2015. As a result, the commencement of the bankruptcy
proceeding against Mr. Karpeles was determined on November 10, 2015, and Ms.
Masako Sakaguchi was appointed as the bankruptcy trustee.
Robert Marie Mark Karpeles was prosecuted on September 11, 2015 on the charges
of unauthorized creation and use of private electromagnetic records and suspicionof corporate embezzlement. Furthermore, he was subsequently prosecuted on
November 18, 2015 on the same charges of unauthorized creation and use ofprivate electromagnetic records and suspicion of corporate embezzlement. He wasreleased on bail on July 14, 2016.

V.

Existence of Circumstances Requiring a Temporary Restraining Order, as

4

Stipulated in Article 177, Paragraph 1 of the Bankruptcy Act, and Officer’s
Liability Assessment Order, as Stipulated in Article 178, Paragraph 1 of the
Bankruptcy Act
With respect to the existence of circumstances requiring a temporary restraining
order, as stipulated in Article 177, Paragraph 1 of the Bankruptcy Act, and officer’s
liability assessment order, as stipulated in Article 178, Paragraph 1 of the
Bankruptcy Act, an investigation is still required to take place concurrently with theinvestigation stated in section III above.
VI.
1.

Matters regarding Progress of Bankruptcy Proceedings
Probability of Distribution, etc.
Now that all bankruptcy claims have been accepted or rejected, henceforth, I wish
to proceed to the distribution process as soon as possible. However, the detailed
schedule thereof will inevitably be affected by each creditor’s response to theacceptance or rejection of his or her claim, etc. Therefore, at present, thepossibility of carrying out a distribution and the timing and method thereof, etc.
have not yet been determined.
I will continue to consider whether, in the case where a distribution is possible, a
distribution will be made by way of distributing BTC.

2.

Provision of Other Necessary Information on Website
Since an extremely large number of creditors exist worldwide in this case, as muchas possible, I plan to disclose information, etc., that are necessary for creditors to beaware of regarding this case on the website that I manage (https://www.mtgox.com)
from time to time.
End of document* This translation is prepared for reference purposes only.

The Japanese version is the original andif there is any discrepancy between the Japanese original and this translation, the Japanese original
supersedes and governs.

5[Translation][Case Number:] Tokyo District Court 2014 (fu) No. 3830
Bankrupt Entity: MtGox Co., Ltd.
Bankruptcy Trustee: Nobuaki Kobayashi, Attorney-at-law

List of Assets(As of April 24, 2014, the date of the order of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings)(In JPY)

Assets
No. Item
1 Cash and deposits
CashAppraised amount(amount incorporated into
the bankruptcy estate)*2
1,336,251
1,359,603
00Book value*1

Mizuho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Ordinary deposit account No.1457705

120,000

Mizuho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Ordinary deposit account No.1497669

0Mizuho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit account No.
9110151
Mizuho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit account No.
9110186
Mizuho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit account No.
9110216
Mizuho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit account No.
9110267
Mizuho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit account No.
9110232
Mizuho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit account No.
9110275
Mizuho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit account No.
9110283
Mizuho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit account No.
9110259
Yucho Bank, Shibuya Branch, Consolidated account No. 10170-48410711

0
0
0
91
28
25
89
945
279,457

Japan Net Bank, Suzume Branch, Ordinary deposit account No.2559084

596,168

Yachiyo Bank, Shibuya Branch, Ordinary deposit account No. 0623839

7

Yachiyo Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit accountNo. 0623949
Yachiyo Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit accountNo.
0623950
Yachiyo Bank, Shibuya Branch, Foreign currency ordinary deposit accountNo. 0623938
Resona Bank, Shibuya Branch, Ordinary deposit account No.2973992

The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been transferred into theaccount of the trustee.
The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been transferred into the47
account of the trustee.
Currency: USD; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been
4transferred into the account of the trustee.
Currency: GBP; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been
5transferred into the account of the trustee.
Currency: AUD; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been
97
transferred into the account of the trustee.
Currency: NZD; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been
4transferred into the account of the trustee.
Currency: DKK; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been87
transferred into the account of the trustee.
Currency: HKD; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been
26
transferred into the account of the trustee.
Currency: SGD; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been
25
transferred into the account of the trustee.
Currency: CHF; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been87
transferred into the account of the trustee.
The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been transferred into the945
account of the trustee.
The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been transferred into the279,213account of the trustee.
The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been transferred into the596,168
account of the trustee.
The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been transferred into the7
account of the trustee.
Currency: AUD; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been
93,468transferred into the account of the trustee.
Currency: EUR; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been
136,041transferred into the account of the trustee.
Currency: USD; The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been
100,677transferred into the account of the trustee.
The account has been closed, and the cash in the account has already been transferred into the100
account of the trustee.

152,6020

Rakuten Bank, Second Sales Branch, Ordinary deposit account No. 7018261

Remarks

95,357
141,608
102,4760

1/3

No. Item
2 Short-term loans

Appraised amount(amount incorporated into
the bankruptcy estate)*2

Book value*1

Remarks

The appraised amount is based on the amount actually converted into cash on or prior to
September 27, 2016.
This company is an affiliated company of the bankrupt, and an order of commencement of
0 bankruptcy proceedings for such company was issued on January 30, 2015. The filing of proofof claims has already been completed.
This company is an affiliated company of the bankrupt. Collected under the claim assignment
46,686,362
agreement on September 29, 2015.

1,307,423,210

46,686,362

TIBANNE Co., Ltd.

772,791,001

K.K. Shade3D

338,139,321

K.K. Bitcoin.Café60,000,000

This company is an affiliated company of the bankrupt, and an order of commencement of
0 bankruptcy proceedings for such company was issued on June 18, 2014. The filing of proof ofclaims has already been completed.

Robert Marie Mark Karpeles

136,175,781

0

MTGOX HongKong

This person is the representative of the bankrupt, and an order of commencement of bankruptcy
proceedings for such person was issued on November 10, 2015.

This company is an affiliated company of the bankrupt. Repayment of the loan is currently
being requested.
The appraised amount is based on the amount actually converted into cash on or prior to
331,600
September 27, 2016.
This company is the parent company of the bankrupt. The accounts receivable against this0company comprise of accrued interest on the loan.

317,1070

3 Accounts receivable

925,826

TIBANNE Co., Ltd

562,026

Shibuya Tax Office (Interim payment of corporation tax)

242,200

243,900 Tax refund was paid into the account of the trustee on July 24, 2014.

80,80080,800 Tax refund was paid into the account of the trustee on July 29, 2014.

Shibuya Metropolitan Taxation Office (Interim payment of enterprise tax andspecial local corporation tax)
Shibuya Metropolitan Taxation Office (Interim payment of inhabitants tax on
corporation tax basis)
4 Provisional payment (to the Tokyo District Court)Counsel for applicant

241,459,630

Upon balancing by taxation on a per capita basis, a tax refund was paid into the account of thetrustee on July 29, 2014.
2,000,000 Collected on June 4, 2014
The appraised amount is based on the amount actually converted into cash on or prior to862,720,420
September 27, 2016.
231,557,866 The money deposited was already succeeded at the appraised amount on May 12, 2014.

Counsel for applicant

509,510,685

500,698,397 The money deposited was already succeeded at the appraised amount on May 9, 2014.

Counsel for applicant

32,978,250

32,977,386 The money deposited was already succeeded at the appraised amount on May 8, 2014.

5 Deposits paid

Others6 Money deposited with other companies

40,8002,000,000
783,948,565

0

97,486,771 Collected on January 7, 2015

1,693,444,088

CoinLab

500,000,000

Others1,193,444,088

7 Tools, furniture and fixtures

6,900

706,433,012

0 Pending litigation
Partly collected. As for the residual amount, the trustee is collecting and/or reviewing the706,433,012
collectibility.
The appraised amount is based on the amount actually converted into cash on or prior to
32,582,300
September 27, 2016.

104,557,699

DELL Server

5,649,000

Violin Server

90,623,142

Apple Japan; 28 laptop computers

5,383,438

Chair

2,902,119

The appraised amount is based on the amount actually converted into cash on or prior to
September 27, 2016.

32,382,300

200,000

2/3

Sold on November 27, 2014. The consideration has already been transferred into the account of
the trustee.
Sold on June 8, 2015. The consideration has already been transferred into the account of thetrustee.

Appraised amount(amount incorporated into
the bankruptcy estate)*2

Book value*1

No. Item
8 Security deposit

Remarks
The appraised amount is based on the amount actually converted into cash on or prior to
September 27, 2016.

700,000

0

The Executive Center Japan K.K.

540,000

0 The contract has been cancelled. Irrecoverable

The Executive Center Japan K.K. (Security deposit for parking spaces）

160,000

0 The contract has been cancelled. Irrecoverable
This is a refund of the money for release from provisional seizure deposited by the bankrupt andhas already been collected.

9 Guaranty money deposited

10,586,875

10,587,933

10 Development expenses

85,875,146

0Applico Inc.

33,453,375

0 No value

Internet Escrow Services

3,073,459

0 No value

Mandalah KK

31,993,500

0 No value

The Phuse Inc.

4,572,513

0 No value

Winsoft Technology Solutions Inc.

12,782,299

11 Interest income
Prepayment for filing bankruptcy

This development expense is currently under investigation, but may be an expense spent in thepast and may have no value.
356,617 Interest on deposit
18,063,297
Return of prepayment for filing bankruptcy against Robert Marie Mark Karpeles (including
3,026,000
return of postal stamps, etc.)000Prepayment for filing bankruptcy against Robert Marie Mark Karpeles0

12 Prepayment for filing bankruptcy against TIBANNE Co., Ltd.
Total assets *3
Liabilities
No. Item
Claims on the estate and preferred bankruptcy claims (Taxes and other public1
charges)
Claims on the estate (Other expenses)

0

15,037,297

3,990,797,660

1,681,121,144

Book value
54,374,152
19,253,642

2 General bankruptcy claims (the “Bankruptcy Claims Related to Exchange”)
General bankruptcy claims (Transacting parties, etc.)
Total liabilities *3

Return of prepayment for filing bankruptcy against TIBANNE (including return of postal stamps,
etc.)

Reported amountThe amount has not yet
been determined.

Remarks

The amount has not yet
been determined.

8,256,092,214

263,519,268,303,371

402,470,293

13,119,083,453

8,732,190,301

The appraised amount is based on the amount actually converted into cash on or prior to
September 27, 2016.

The amount has not yet
been determined.

*1 The amounts stated in the "book value" column are, as a rule, entered by referring to the book value as of April 24, 2014, and such amounts do not correspond to their respective amounts of proceeds from their conversion into cash.
*2 As a rule, the "appraised amount (amount incorporated into the bankruptcy estate)" shows the amount actually collected on or prior to September 27, 2016.
*3 The bitcoins held by the bankrupt entity are not included in the assets set forth above. In addition, the amount of bitcoins managed by the bankruptcy estate as of September 21, 2016 is 202,185.35450043 BTC.
*4 This list has been prepared based on the investigation results at the present point in time, and assets or liabilities not included in this list may be discovered as a result of further investigation.
* This translation is prepared for reference purpose only. The Japanese version is the original and if there is any discrepancy between the Japanese original and this translation, the Japanese original supersedes and governs.

3/3

[Translation]

Income and Expenditure Statement
From April 24, 2014
Through September 27, 2016

[Case Number:] Tokyo District Court 2014 (fu ) No. 3830
Bankrupt Entity: MtGox Co., Ltd.
Bankruptcy Trustee: Nobuaki Kobayashi, Attorney-at-law(In JPY)
IncomeNo.

Abstract1

Cash and deposits succeeded from thebankrupt

2

Expenditure
AmountNo.

766,593,252

1

Office expenses

30,191,242

Deposits succeeded from the court

2,000,000

2

Expenses for notice of commencement ofbankruptcy proceedings to bankruptcy

6,890,292

3

Collection of monies deposited

10,587,933

3

Supplies expenses

8,840,785

4Interest income

356,617

4

Professional fees

275,530,917

5

Tax refund

331,600

5

Outsourcing fees

125,418,228

6

Collection of money deposited withother companies

706,433,012

6

Settlement Money (Expense for terminating
telecommunication related agreement)

7

Money provided as assistance by
Payward under the contract forproviding assistance and others inbankruptcy proceedings

32,382,300

7Transportation expenses

8Collection of deposits paid

97,486,771

8

Rent and deposit for the bankruptcy trustee's
office5,260,540

9Proceeds from sale of fixtures

200,000

9

Tax and public dues (withholding tax oftrustee's fee, etc.)

29,010,413

10

Price for assignment of loan to K.K.
Shade3D

46,686,362

10

Call center expense

6,335,718

3,026,000

11

Prepayment for filing bankruptcy against
TIBANNE

15,000,000

15,037,297

12

Trustee's fee

114,550,633

13Prepayment for filing bankruptcy against
Robert Marie Mark Karpeles

1112

Return of prepayment for filingbankruptcy against Robert Marie
Mark Karpeles (including return of
postal stamps, etc.)
Return of prepayment for filingbankruptcy against TIBANNE(including return of postal stamps,
etc.)

Total

1,681,121,144

Abstract

Total

Amount6,310,433

298,930

3,000,000
626,638,131

Balance

1,054,483,013* This translation is prepared for reference purpose only. The Japanese version is the original and if there is any discrepancy
between the Japanese original and this translation, the Japanese original supersedes and governs.

[Translation][Case Number:] Tokyo District Court 2014 (fu ) No. 3830
Bankrupt Entity: MtGox Co., Ltd.
Bankruptcy Trustee: Nobuaki Kobayashi, Attorney-at-law(As of April 24, 2014, the date of the order of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings)[Bankruptcy] Balance Sheet
In JPY
Appraised amount(amount incorporated
into the bankruptcy
estate)*1

Item

Item

Filling amount

Cash and deposits

1,359,603

Claims on the estate andpreferred bankruptcy claims

Short-term loans

46,686,362

General bankruptcy claims

263,532,387,386,824

Total liabilities

263,532,461,014,618

Accounts receivable

331,600

Provisional payment

2,000,000

Deposits paid

862,720,420

Money deposited with othercompanies

706,433,012

Tools, furniture and fixtures

32,582,300

Security deposit

73,627,794

0

Guaranty money deposited

10,587,933

Development expenses

0Interest income

356,617

Prepayment for filing bankruptcy
Total assets*3*2

18,063,297
1,681,121,144*1 The "appraised amount (amount incorporated into the bankruptcy estate)" shows the amount actually collected onor prior to September 27, 2016.
*2 The bitcoins held by the bankrupt entity are not included in the assets set forth above.In addition, the amount of
bitcoins managed by the bankruptcy estate as of September 21, 2016 is 202,185.35450043 BTC.
*3 The amounts of these liabilities are based on the book value of the bankrupt at the time of the order ofcommencement of bankruptcy proceedings because requests for distribution have not yet been completed.
*4 This balance sheet has been prepared based on the investigation results at the present point in time, and assets or
liabilities not included in this balance sheet may be discovered as a result of further investigation.
* This translation is prepared for reference purpose only. The Japanese version is the original and if there is any
discrepancy between the Japanese original and this translation, the Japanese original supersedes and governs.

Exhibit H

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXASDALLAS DIVISIONIn re:

Chapter 15

MtGox Co., Ltd. (a/k/a MtGox KK),

Case No. 14-31229-sgj-15

Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding.

ORDER APPROVING (I) SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT WITH U.S. GOVERNMENT;(II) TRANSFER OF SEIZED FUNDS IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, PURSUANTTO 11 U.S.C. §§363 AND 1520(a)(2); AND (III) REPATRIATION
OF THE RELEASED FUNDS TO JAPAN FOR DISTRIBUTION IN THE
JAPAN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C § 1521(b)This matter coming before the Court on the motion (the “Motion”) of Nobuaki
Kobayashi, in his capacity as the bankruptcy trustee and foreign representative (the “Foreign
Representative”) of MtGox Co., Ltd., a/k/a MtGox KK, a debtor in a bankruptcy proceedingunder Japanese law (the “Japan Bankruptcy”), currently pending before the Twentieth Civil
Division of the Tokyo District Court, Japan, for an Order: (i) approving the Settlement

Agreement;1 (ii) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 363 and 1520(a)(2), approving thetransfer of Released Funds to the Foreign Representative and the forfeiture of the ForfeitedFunds to the Government in accordance with the Settlement Agreement; and (iii) pursuant toBankruptcy Code Section 1521(b), approving the repatriation of the Released Funds to Japan for
distribution in the Japan Bankruptcy; and the Court having jurisdiction over this Motion pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334; and the Court having determined that the legal and factual bases
set forth in the Motion establish cause for the relief granted herein;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is granted to the extent set forth herein;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is approved pursuant to 11
U.S.C. §§ 363 and 1520(a)(2) insofar as it provides for the transfer of an interest of the Debtor inproperty within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 363 and 1520(a)(2), theReleased Funds are authorized to be transferred to the Foreign Representative, and the Foreign
Representative is authorized to forfeit the Forfeited Funds to the Government in accordance with
the Settlement Agreement;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1521(b), the Released Funds
are authorized to be repatriated to Japan for distribution in the Japan Bankruptcy; andIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction to hear and determine all
matters arising from or related to the implementation, interpretation and enforcement of thisOrder.
### End of Order ###1

Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.

2

David J. Molton
Daniel J. Saval
BROWN RUDNICK LLP
Seven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: (212) 209-4800
Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
Email: dmolton@brownrudnick.com
Email: dsaval@brownrudnick.com- and Marcus A. Helt (TX 24052187)
Thomas Scannell (TX 24070559)
GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP
2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: (214) 999-3000
Facsimile: (214) 999-4667
Email: mhelt@gardere.com
Email: tscannell@gardere.com
Counsel for Nobuaki Kobayashi, in his capacity
as the Bankruptcy Trustee and Foreign Representativeof MtGox Co., Ltd., a/k/a MtGox KK
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXASDALLAS DIVISIONIn re:

Chapter 15

MtGox Co., Ltd. (a/k/a MtGox KK),

Case No. 14-31229-sgj-15

Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding.
NOTICE OF HEARING
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing on the Foreign Representative’s Motion for an
Order Approving (I) Settlement Agreement with U.S. Government; (II) Transfer of Seized Funds
in Accordance with the Settlement Agreement Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 363 and 1520(a)(2); and(III) Repatriation of Released Funds to Japan for Distribution in the Japan Bankruptcy

NOTICE OF HEARING
Gardere01 - 10045299v.1

Page 1

Proceedings Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1521(b) [Docket No. 174] has been scheduled for April 24,
2017, at 9:30 a.m. (prevailing Central time) before the Honorable Stacey G. C. Jernigan,
United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Texas, 1100 Commerce Street,
Courtroom 1428, Dallas, Texas 75242-1496.

Dated: February 28, 2017

Respectfully submitted,
GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP/s/ Thomas Scannell
Marcus A. Helt (TX 24052187)
Thomas Scannell (TX 24070559)
Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: (214) 999-3000
Facsimile: (214) 999-4667
Email: mhelt@gardere.com
Email: tscannell@gardere.com- and BROWN RUDNICK LLPDavid J. Molton
Daniel J. Saval
Seven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: (212) 209-4800
Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
Email: dmolton@brownrudnick.com
Email: dsaval@brownrudnick.com
Counsel for Nobuaki Kobayashi, in his capacity
as the Trustee and Foreign Representativeof MtGox Co., Ltd., a/k/a MtGox KK

NOTICE OF HEARING
Gardere01 - 10045299v.1

Page 2