The Interest in World Geography in 19th Century China
and “Fundamental Information about the Russian State” by Lin Zexu
By Sergey VradiyAfter the impressive naval expeditions of Zheng He (1371-1435) in the early Ming
dynasty, Chinese scholarship as a whole turned away from the outside world anddevoted itself primarily to introspection. But curiosity about the non-Chinese world
could not be completely stifled. China by the nineteenth century required timely
current, realistic, and detailed literature concerning the outside world anddevelopments beyond China.
The middle of the nineteenth century was a crucial period in the history of China. It
was a period of increased contacts with Western countries – namely, Great Britain,
the United States, France and Russia. These contacts were made with the active
participation of European countries and passive attempts by China to resist thepenetration of Western countries. The “opium” wars, which occurred from 18401850, struck a crippling blow to the Qing dynasty.
Uncertainty about the unshakability of traditional Confucian postulates, which
propagated the superiority of the “Middle Kingdom” over the “barbarian” countries,
developed among Chinese intellectuals. Some of the most farsighted of theintellectual class explored the origins and power of Western countries. They began
to investigate the accessible information about the state structure, systems of
economic administration, education, and the sources of their military power. They
discovered that there were many things which were worth acquiring from“barbarians.”
Confrontation with the West during the first half of the nineteenth century jolted
the Chinese into a more realistic perception of the wider world. Before the Opium
War, the Chinese took little notice of the world beyond the traditional Chinese
realm; during the course of the war China’s inadequate knowledge of overseas
countries proved to be a strategic disadvantage. In the 1840s, knowledge of thewider world was important to China’s defense against Western intrusion, and ahandful of Chinese scholar-officials who shared this view engaged in the serious
study of foreign nations. A small but influential group of Chinese set out to expand
China’s knowledge of the West; they did so in the belief that this was essential to
China’s survival. The comprehensive accounts put together by Lin Zexu 林則徐(1785-1850), Wei Yuan 魏源 (1794-1856), and Xu Jiyu 徐継審 (1795-1853), andshorter works by other authors suggested the importance of this new perspective.
China’s “response to the West” is a major theme in modern Chinese history. This
response was not a simple one, and Chinese knowledge of the West was often
filtered through traditional concepts. The major elements of an ancient worldview
still prevailed, even as the Chinese began to assimilate new knowledge regarding
the West.

For almost the entire eighteenth century the intellectual climate of China had been
dominated by the so-called School of Han Learning. The scholars of this school
avoided discussing politics and were devoted to the study of philosophy and textual
criticism. The dominant position of the Han School was not shaken until the second
quarter of the nineteenth century when the symptoms of dynastic decline became
obvious and the scholar-officials began to be concerned about the political problemsof their time.
The early nineteenth century saw the reemergence of interest in the school ofstatecraft or “learning of practical use to society” 經世之用 jing-shi zhi-yong. It hadflourished in the seventeenth century but, mainly due to the repressive policy of the
Qianlong Emperor (1736-1795) towards the intellectual class, was overshadowed by
the school of scholasticism in the eighteenth century.
The re-emergence of the statecraft school in the nineteenth century was evidenced
by the revitalization of jin-wen 今文 or “Modern Text School” of classical learning,which laid stress on one’s emotional need for moral commitment to bring peace andprosperity to state and society in a practical way.
An important scholar in this intellectual revival was Zhuang Cunyu 莊存與(17191788), his grandson Liu Fenglu 劉逢祿 (1776-1829), the prolific writers Gong Zizhen龔自珍 (1792-1841) and Bao Shichen 包世臣 (1775-1855), and the frontier expert Yao
Ying 姚瑩 (1785-1853). This group also included Lin Zexu and Huang Juezi 黃爵滋(1793-1853), who were to play important roles in the Opium War, and Wei Yuan
and Feng Guifen 馮桂芬 (1809-1874), who later were noted as reformers primarily
interested in the problems arising from China’s relations with the West.
In the preface to Huang-chao jing-shi wen-bian 皇朝經世文編 (Collection of Qing
dynasty writings on statecraft), Wei Yuan set forth two basic approaches of thestatecraft school: emphasis on the present, and stress on the importance of practicalapplication.
One of the problems to which jing-shi scholars paid increasing attention was thefrontier problem, concerning Inner Asia and the sea coast. With mounting Western
incursions from the south-east coast, the second quarter of the nineteenth century
saw a significant reorientation in the focus of Chinese statecraft – from Inner Asia
to the maritime world, whence came “barbarians” with a new technology.
The early writings on maritime defense naturally focused on the Guangdong coast(Guang Tianpei, Liang Tingnan, Li Fuxiang). The overriding concern of somestatecraft intellectual-officials was to understand the maritime West. For
Commissioner Lin Zexu, an effective way was through translation. Wei Yuan latersuggested the establishment of an official translation institute. Guo Songtao’s 郭嵩
燾 (1818-1891) 1859 memoirs proposed the creation of an official school for theteaching of foreign languages. Information was gathered on western history,geography, law and political conditions. Impressive as these works might be, it was
the study of world geography that was to have the most considerable and lasting
influence.

2

The interest in world geography appeared on the surface to be directed towards
obtaining knowledge of the unknown Western world, and indeed of the entire globe.
But when we consider the urgent needs of the times, it can be seen as a movement
to strengthen China’s own knowledge and ability. In other words, a segment ofChinese officials and intellectuals of the period, after a war with a barbarian stateof Western Europe, urgently sought to understand the enemy and discover whatkind of place Europe was. It was necessary to seek correct answers. Under thispressure, there was a surge of interest in world geography.
After 1840 Chinese intellectuals gradually began to pay more attention to thesubject of world geography, and by the 1860s more than twenty books had been
written on the subject.
One of the persons who first applied knowledge gained from Western countries wasan eminent state official, the scholar Lin Zexu. He has been honored andremembered for his resolute opposition to the opium trade and stiff resistance toforeign incursions. Also essential, in the author’s opinion, is Lin’s contribution to
the development of Chinese social and political thought in the nineteenth century,and to the creation of a system of views and ideas about the vital necessity ofunderstanding and mastering the achievements of Western science. The main ideasof this theory, which was later called the doctrine of learning “overseas affairs,” canbe found in Lin’s “Gazetteer of the Four Continents”[Lin, 1] “Foreigners about
China” [Lin, 3], “Macao Monthly” [Lin, 4], “Fundamental Information about theRussian State” [Lin, 2] etc.
Lin Zexu’s work “Fundamental Information about the Russian State” has not
attracted the attention of scholars yet. A unique wood block of this nineteenth
century work is keeping now in the archive of Chinese manuscripts at the Libraryof Institute of Oriental Manuscripts (former St. Petersburg branch of the Instituteof Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences). Lin Zexu wrote it while in
Canton (1839-1841), where he was sent by order of the Emperor as a State
Commissioner with plenipotentiary powers 欽 差 大 臣 . There in the southern
provinces of China, where the opium trade flourished most of all, the influence ofwestern countries and its penetration into China was immense.
Initially “Fundamental Information about the Russian State” was included as anindependent part in Lin’s work “Gazetteer of the Four Continents” which, in its
turn, became a section of a work by the prominent Chinese philosopher, poet andhistorian Wei Yuan, “The Illustrated Gazetteer of Maritime Countries” [Wei, 6]. The
main theme of Wei’s paper is as follows:“What is the purpose of the present work? Its purpose is to show how to
use barbarians to fight barbarians, how to make the barbarians pacify
one another (to our advantage), and how to employ the superior
techniques of the barbarians in order to control them.” [Wei 6, 3rd ed.
Preface: 1a].
Wei Yuan advocated the ancient idea of using “barbarians” to deal with“barbarians” and gave it a new dimension, that of learning from “barbarians” in3order to resist and drive off “barbarians,” including the very same “barbarians” fromwhom the learning had come.
In 1882 Lin Zexu’s “Fundamental Information about the Russian State,” together
with two works on Russia by high state official Yao Ying 姚瑩 (1785-1853), waspublished in China in the collection “Fundamental Information about Russia.”
Lin Zexu’s interest in Russia was not just casual. Tsarist Russia had an extensive
mutual border with China and was undoubtedly an area of concern for the Qing
rulers. Russia was not only a potentially useful tool against Britain, and other
Western countries but also a key example of how a large but weak and poor country
could be raised to parity with any European power by imitation and adoption ofEuropean industrial-military methods. He found that Peter the Great, a popular
example for later Chinese modernizers, and even the notoriously lewd, but talented
Catherine II of Russia had recognized the usefulness of learning the skills of otherpeoples. Consequently Russia had become powerful. This was a potent argument forthe self-strengtheners of a later day.
The publication of the manuscript in the beginning of 1880s was natural. The
second half of the nineteenth century witnessed a “second birth” of the above
mentioned works of Lin Zexu, Wei Yuan, Xu Jiyu, because the first appearance of
their works received sparse attention from Chinese society. Their writings
essentially influenced the development of social thought in Japan during the “Meiji
Restoration” 明治維新, and stirred up a whole generation of Japanese intellectuals
like Sakuma Shozan 佐久間象山 (1811-1864), Ioshida Shoin 吉田松陰 (1830-1859),
and Saigo Takamori 西郷隆盛 (1827-1877). In spite of the fact that the works firstemerged in China, the interest towards it was revealed previously in Japan, andonly in the second half of the nineteenth century did Chinese intellectuals give it
any serious attention.
Only the 1860s, signified by the attempts of Chinese officials to put into life the socalled “policy of self-strengthening,” stimulated the growth of interest in Westerncountries and therefore in the works where these countries were described.
Chinese historians have determined one of the main sources which Lin Zexu usedwhile creating his works on Western countries: H. Murray, The Encyclopedia of
Geography [5]. Published in the first half of the 19th century, it offered the latest
information about the whole world.
Lin Zexu’s work was not a literal translation of the source material. One of the maintasks of Lin’s work was to show the contemporary power of Russia and try toinvestigate its origins. As a whole the manuscript gives a brief description of theRussian empire divided into regions with inner and outer borders, the quantity ofits military forces within each region, climate-specific features, religious confessions,
local crafts, customs of the inhabitants, some historical issues, etc.
Despite numerous errors in geographic assertions, in political or in historicalsequence, the work presented a world of distinct individual nations, with variationin habits, society and technological progress.
4

Lin’s work is significant. On the one hand, it allowed China to trace the origins,formation, and current evolution of the image of Russia; and on the other hand, it
broadened the horizons of understanding of domestic history and the history of
foreign countries as well. It also helped to clear up some episodes in the history of
Russia-Chinese relations.
It is worth mentioning that “Fundamental Information” is one of the firstmanuscripts published in China which was wholly devoted to the description of
Russia.
The historical role of the above mentioned progressive representatives of social
thought of nineteenth century China goes considerably beyond the period of theiractivity. Their positive influence on contemporaries and on the social thought ofsubsequent generations, though studied insufficiently, is generally recognized. They
were among the first to show an interest in the outside world, in the scientific andtechnological achievements of the West, and became opponents to the policy of
isolation.
The phenomenon of Lin Zexu was that in a crucial period of Chinese history, being
in the epicenter of Anglo-Chinese conflict, and working mainly from the point ofview of Confucian philosophy, he could leave behind some of the traditional
stereotypes and soberly evaluate the scientific and technological superiority offoreigners (“barbarians”). He understood, that to withstand foreign invasion, China
would have to assimilate and master the achievements of Western science.
Modern historians, studying the foreign policy of the Peoples Republic of China(which includes the active development of international commerce andincorporation of the Chinese economy into the international labor force) cite themen discussed above as pioneers in this subject.
Additional analysis of the lives and activities of these outstanding representativesof the social and political thought of mid-nineteenth century China allows for amore complete understanding of the general processes of development of Chinesesocial and political thought, which in turn greatly influenced the social developmentof Asian countries.
List of References
1. 林則徐 Lin Zexu. 四州志 Si-zhou zhi (Gazetteer of the Four Continents). 20 卷
juan. In Wang Xi-qi 王錫祺 (ed.) (1877-1897), 小方壺齋輿地叢鈔 Xiao-fang-huzhai yu-di cong-chao (Collected Texts on Geography from the Xiao-fang-hu
Studio). Pt. 3, case 8, ji 12, ze 59, item 1, pp. 1-8b. Shanghai.
2. 林則徐 Lin Zexu. 俄羅斯國記要 Eluosi-guo ji-yao (Fundamental Information
about the Russian State). In: 俄 羅 斯 記 要 Eluosi ji-yao (Fundamental
Information about Russia). Preface 1882. Shanghai (Wood block).
3. 林則徐 Lin Zexu. 華事夷言 Hua-shi yi-yan (Foreigners about China). Shanghai,
1931.
4. 林則徐 Lin Zexu. 奧門月報 Aomen yue-bao (Macao Monthly). Shanghai, 1954.
55. Murray, Hugh. The Encyclopedia of Geography. In 3 vols. London, 1834; 1strev. ed. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea and Blanchard, 1837.
6. 魏源 Wei Yuan. 海國圖誌 Hai-guo tu-zhi (Illustrated Gazetteer of Maritime
Countries). 50 卷 juan in 2 ze. 1844; 60 卷 juan. 2nd ed. 1847; 100 卷 juan. 3d
ed. Yangzhou, 1852.
Sergey Vradiy, Senior Reserach Fellow of the Institute of History, Archeology andEthnography of Peoples of the Far East and Visiting Fellow at the Slavic ResearchCenter (June-October 2008)＊The views expressed in the essay belong solely to the author and do not represent theofficial position of any organizations to which the author is permanently or was
temporarily affiliated.

6