FLUOROMONOMERSMANUFACTURING PROCESSVE SOUTH CARBON BEDREMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND
VE SOUTH STACK EMISSIONS TEST REPORTTEST DATES: 16 AND 17 JULY 2019
THE CHEMOURS COMPANYFAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:

THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
22828 NC Hwy 87 W
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28306

Prepared by:

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.
1400 Weston Way
P.O. Box 2653
West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380

August 2019
W.O. No. 15418.002.016

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

8/20/2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section1.

Page

INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1
1.1

FACILITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ...........................................1

1.2

TEST OBJECTIVES ...............................................................................................1

1.3

TEST PROGRAM OVERVIEW .............................................................................1

2.

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ...................................................................................53.

PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................6

4.

5.

3.1

FLUOROMONOMERS ..........................................................................................6

3.2

PROCESS OPERATIONS AND PARAMETERS .................................................6

DESCRIPTION OF TEST LOCATIONS .......................................................................7
4.1

VE SOUTH STACK ................................................................................................7

4.2

VE SOUTH CARBON BED INLET AND OUTLET ............................................7

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS ...........................................................11
5.1
5.2

5.3
6.

STACK GAS SAMPLING PROCEDURES .........................................................11
5.1.1
Pre-Test Determinations .........................................................................11
STACK PARAMETERS .......................................................................................11
5.2.1
EPA Method 0010...................................................................................11
5.2.2
EPA Method 0010 Sample Recovery .....................................................14
5.2.3
EPA Method 0010 Sample Analysis.......................................................15
GAS COMPOSITION ...........................................................................................17

DETAILED TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .....................................................20

APPENDIX APROCESS OPERATIONS DATAAPPENDIX B

RAW AND REDUCED TEST DATAAPPENDIX CLABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTAPPENDIX DSAMPLE CALCULATIONSAPPENDIX E

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION RECORDSAPPENDIX F

LIST OF PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMDi

8/20/2019

LIST OF FIGURES
Title

Page

Figure 4-1 VE South Stack Test Port and Traverse Point Location .............................................. 8
Figure 4-2 VE South Carbon Bed Inlet and Schematic ................................................................. 9
Figure 4-3 VE South Carbon Bed Outlet and Schematic ............................................................ 10
Figure 5-1 EPA Method 0010 Sampling Train ............................................................................. 12
Figure 5-2 HFPO Dimer Acid Sample Recovery Procedures for Method 0010 ......................... 16
Figure 5-3 WESTON Sampling System ...................................................................................... 19

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

ii

8/20/2019

LIST OF TABLES
Title

Page

Table 1-1 Sampling Plan for VE South Carbon Bed Testing ......................................................... 3
Table 1-2 Sampling Plan for VE South Stack ................................................................................ 4
Table 2-1 Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid VE South Carbon Bed and Stack Test Results ........... 5
Table 6-1 Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid Test Data and Test Results Carbon Bed Inlet – Runs
1, 2, and 3 .............................................................................................................................. 21
Table 6-2 Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid Test Data and Test Results Carbon Bed Outlet – Runs
1, 2, and 3 .............................................................................................................................. 23
Table 6-3 Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid Test Data and Test Results VE South Stack – Runs 1,
2 and 3 ................................................................................................................................... 25

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

iii

8/20/2019

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 FACILITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATIONThe Chemours Fayetteville Works (Chemours) is located in Bladen County, North Carolina,
approximately 10 miles south of the city of Fayetteville. Chemours operating areas on the site
include the Fluoromonomers, IXM and Polymer Processing Aid (PPA) manufacturing areas,
Wastewater Treatment, and Powerhouse.
Chemours contracted Weston Solutions, Inc. (Weston) to perform HFPO Dimer Acid Fluoride,
captured as HFPO Dimer Acid, emission testing on the Vinyl Ethers (VE) South Carbon Bed and
VE South stack at the facility. Testing was performed on 16 and 17 July 2019 and generally
followed the “Emission Test Protocol” reviewed and approved by the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). This report provides the results from theemission test program.
1.2 TEST OBJECTIVESThe specific objectives for this test program were as follows:Measure the emissions concentrations and mass emissions rates of HFPO Dimer Acid
Fluoride from the VE South Carbon Bed inlet and outlet and VE South stack which arelocated in the Fluoromonomers process area.
Calculate the Carbon Bed removal efficiency for HFPO Dimer Acid.
Monitor and record process and emissions control data in conjunction with the test
program.
Provide representative emissions data.

1.3 TEST PROGRAM OVERVIEW
During the emissions test program, the concentrations and mass emissions rates of HFPO Dimer
Acid were measured at three locations.
Tables 1-1 and 1-2 provide a summary of the test locations and the parameters that were
measured along with the sampling/analytical procedures that were followed.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

1

8/20/2019Section 2 provides a summary of test results. A description of the processes is provided in
Section 3. Section 4 provides a description of the test locations. The sampling and analyticalprocedures are provided in Section 5. Detailed test results and discussion are provided in
Section 6.
Appendix C includes the summary reports for the laboratory analytical results. The fulllaboratory data packages are provided separately in electronic format.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD2

8/20/2019Table 1-1
Sampling Plan for VE South Carbon Bed Testing
Sampling Point & Location
Number of Tests:
Parameters To Be Tested:

Sampling or Monitoring Method

Sample Extraction/ Analysis Method(s):Sample Size
Total Number of Samples Collected1
Reagent Blanks (Solvents, Resins)1
Field Blank Trains1
Proof Blanks1
Trip Blanks1,2
Lab Blanks
Laboratory or Batch Control Spike Samples(LCS)
Laboratory or Batch Control Spike Sample
Duplicate (LCSD)Media Blanks
Isotope Dilution Internal Standard Spikes
Total No. of Samples

VE South Carbon Bed
6 (3 Carbon Bed inlet, 3 Carbon Bed outlet)
HFPO Dimer
Volumetric
CarbonOxygen Water Content
Acid
Flow Rate andDioxideGas Velocity(HFPO-DA)
EPA M4 in
EPA M-0010
EPA M1 and
EPA M3/3A
conjunction
M2 inwith M-0010
conjunction
testswith M-0010
tests
LC/MS/MS
NA6
NA
NA
3
≥ 1.5m
NA
NA
NA
NA
6
1 set
1 per source

6
0
0

3
0
0

3
0
0

6
0
0

1 per train
1 set
1 per fraction3
1 per fraction3

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0

1 per fraction3

0

0

0

0

1 set4Each sample
105

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

6

3

3

6

0
0

Key:
1 Sample collected in field.
2 Trip blanks include one XAD-2 resin module and one methanol sample per sample shipment.
3 Lab blank and LCS/LCSD includes one set per analytical fraction (front half, back half and condensate).
4 One set of media blank archived at laboratory at media preparation.
5 Actual number of samples collected in field.
6 Not applicable.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

3

8/20/2019Table 1-2
Sampling Plan for VE South Stack
Sampling Point & Location
Number of Tests:
Parameters To Be Tested:

Sampling or Monitoring Method

HFPO Dimer
Acid(HFPO-DA)
EPA M-0010

Sample Extraction/ Analysis Method(s):Sample Size

LC/MS/MS≥ 1.5m3

Total Number of Samples Collected1
Reagent Blanks (Solvents, Resins)1
Field Blank Trains1
Proof Blanks1
Trip Blanks1,2
Lab Blanks
Laboratory or Batch Control Spike Samples(LCS)
Laboratory or Batch Control Spike Sample
Duplicate (LCSD)Media Blanks
Isotope Dilution Internal Standard Spikes
Total No. of Samples

VE South Stack3
Volumetric
CarbonFlow Rate andDioxideGas Velocity
EPA M1 andM2 inconjunction
with M-0010
tests
NA6

OxygenWater Content

EPA M3/3A

EPA M4 inconjunction
with M-0010
tests

NA

3
0
0

NA
3
0
0

NA
3
0
0

NA
3
0
0

NA
NA
3
0
0

0
0
1 per fraction3
1 per fraction3

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

1 per fraction3

0

0

0

0

1 set4Each sample
35

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

3

3

3

3

Key:
1 Sample collected in field.
2 Trip blanks include one XAD-2 resin module and one methanol sample per sample shipment.
3 Lab blank and LCS/LCSD includes one set per analytical fraction (front half, back half and condensate).
4 One set of media blank archived at laboratory at media preparation.
5 Actual number of samples collected in field.
6 Not applicable.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

4

8/20/20192. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
A total of three test runs each were performed on the VE South Carbon Bed inlet and outlet and
VE South stack. Table 2-1 provides a summary of the HFPO Dimer Acid emissions test resultsand Carbon Bed removal efficiencies. Detailed test results summaries are provided in Section 6.
It is important to note that emphasis is being placed on the characterization of the emissions
based on the stack test results. Research conducted in developing the protocol for stack testing
HFPO Dimer Acid Fluoride, HFPO Dimer Acid Ammonium Salt and HFPO Dimer Acid
realized that the resulting testing, including collection of the air samples and extraction of thevarious fraction of the sampling train, would result in all three compounds being expressed as
simply the HFPO Dimer Acid. However, it should be understood that the total HFPO Dimer
Acid results provided in Table 2-1 and in this report include a percentage of each of the threecompounds.
Table 2-1
Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid VE South Carbon Bed and Stack Test Results
Inlet
R1
R2
R3
Averageg/sec
4.17E-04
8.50E-05
3.69E-05
1.80E-04

lb/hr
3.31E-03
6.75E-04
2.93E-04
1.43E-03

Outletg/sec
6.01E-05
1.71E-05
1.95E-05
3.23E-05

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

lb/hr
4.78E-04
1.36E-04
1.55E-04
2.56E-04

5

RemovalEfficiency
%
85.6
79.8
47.1
65.9

VE South Stackg/sec
3.04E-05
2.17E-05
1.58E-05
2.26E-05

lb/hr
2.41E-04
1.72E-04
1.25E-04
1.80E-04

8/20/20193. PROCESS DESCRIPTIONSThe Fluoromonomers area is included in the scope of this test program.
3.1 FLUOROMONOMERS
These facilities produce a family of fluorocarbon compounds used to produce Chemours
products such as Nafion®, Krytox®, and Viton®, as well as sales to outside customers.
The VE South Waste Gas Scrubber and the Tower HVAC are vented to the carbon bed whichthen vents to the process stack (NEP-Hdr2). In addition, the following building air systems are
vented to this stack:

RV Catch Pots
Nitrogen Supply to Catch Tanks
Catalyst Feed Tank Pot Charge Vent

3.2 PROCESS OPERATIONS AND PARAMETERS
The following table is a summary of the operation and products from the specific areas tested.
SourceVE
SouthOperation/Product
PMVE/PEVE

Batch or Continuous
Semi-continuous – Condensation is continuous, Two
Agitated Bed Reactors are batch for 30-40 mins at
end of each run*, Refining (ether column) is batch*Only one Agitated Bed Reactor was running due to cooling limiting capacity during testing.

During the test program, the following parameters were monitored by Chemours and areincluded in Appendix A.
Fluoromonomers Processes
o VE South Waste Gas Scrubber
 Caustic recirculation flow rate

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

6

8/20/20194. DESCRIPTION OF TEST LOCATIONS
4.1 VE SOUTH STACK
Two 6-inch ID test ports are installed on the 42-inch ID steel stack. The ports are placed 150
inches (3.6 diameters) from the location where the carbon bed vent enters the stack and 20 feet
(5.7 diameters) from the stack exit.
Per EPA Method 1, a total of 24 traverse points (12 per axis) were used for M0010 isokinetic
sampling. It should be noted that near the port locations are a number of small ducts leading to
the stack. These are catch pots which, under normal operation, do not discharge to the stack.
They are used to vent process gas to the stack in the event of a process upset. For the purpose of
test port location, and given the fact that there is no flow from these catch pots, they are notconsidered a flow contributor or a disturbance.
See Figure 4-1 for a schematic of the test port and traverse point locations.
Note: All measurements at the test location were confirmed prior to sampling.
4.2 VE SOUTH CARBON BED INLET AND OUTLET
The fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) duct at the inlet of the carbon bed is 36-inch ID. The
stainless steel duct at the outlet of the carbon bed is 41.5-inch ID. The test ports are located asshown below. Based on EPA Method 1, a total of 24 traverse points (12 per port) were requiredfor HFPO Dimer Acid sampling at both locations. Figures 4-2 and 4-3 provide schematics of the
Carbon Bed inlet and Carbon Bed outlet test port and traverse port locations, respectively.
Location
Carbon Bed Inlet
Carbon Bed Outlet
VE South Stack

Distance from Flow DisturbanceDownstream (B)Upstream (A)35 inches
41 inches> 0.97 duct diameters> 1.1 duct diameters12.5 feet
31 feet> 4.2 duct diameters> 10.3 duct diameters
150 inches
20 feet
3.6 duct diameters
5.7 diameters

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

7

8/20/2019

42 "

20 '

CATCH
POTS

150 "
ROOF
LINE

TRAVERSEPOINT
NUMBERDISTANCE FROMINSIDE NEAR
WALL (INCHES)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

1
2 7/8
5
7 3/8
10 1/215
27
31 1/2
34 5/837
39 1/8
41

CATCH
POT

FROM
CARBONBED

ID
FAN

DRAWING NOT TO SCALE

FIGURE 4-1
VE SOUTH STACK TEST PORT AND
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION
8IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\FIGURE 4-1 VE SOUTH SCRUBBER STACKTop View
36"

TRAVERSEPOINT
NUMBERDISTANCE FROMINSIDE NEAR
WALL (INCHES)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

1
2 3/4
4 7/8
7 3/8
10 3/814 3/426 3/431 1/834 1/836 5/838 3/440 1/235"

41"

TO CARBON BEDDRAWING NOT TO SCALE

FIGURE 4-2
VE SOUTH CARBON BED INLET SCHEMATIC

9IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\FIGURE 4-1 VE SOUTH CB INLET SCHEMATIC

Side View

41.5"

TRAVERSEPOINT
NUMBERDISTANCE FROMINSIDE NEAR
WALL (INCHES)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

1
2 3/8
4 1/4
6 3/8
9
12 7/823 1/827
29 5/831 3/433 5/835FAN

CARBON BED

31'

12.5'
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE

FIGURE 4-3
VE SOUTH CARBON BED OUTLET SCHEMATIC
10IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\FIGURE 4-1 VE SOUTH CB OUTLET SCHEMATIC

5. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
5.1 STACK GAS SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The purpose of this section is to describe the stack gas emissions sampling trains and to provide
details of the stack sampling and analytical procedures utilized during the emissions test
program.
5.1.1 Pre-Test Determinations
Preliminary test data were obtained at each test location. Stack geometry measurements were
measured and recorded, and traverse point distances verified. A preliminary velocity traverse
was performed utilizing a calibrated S-type pitot tube and an inclined manometer to determine
velocity profiles. Flue gas temperatures were observed with a calibrated direct readout panel
meter equipped with a chromel-alumel thermocouple. Preliminary water vapor content wasestimated by wet bulb/dry bulb temperature measurements.
A check for the presence or absence of cyclonic flow was conducted at each test location. The
cyclonic flow checks were negative (< 20°) verifying that the test locations were acceptable fortesting.
Preliminary test data was used for nozzle sizing and sampling rate determinations for isokinetic
sampling procedures.
Calibration of probe nozzles, pitot tubes, metering systems, and temperature measurement
devices was performed as specified in Section 5 of EPA Method 5 test procedures.
5.2 STACK PARAMETERS
5.2.1 EPA Method 0010
The sampling train utilized to perform the HFPO Dimer Acid sampling at all three locations was
an EPA Method 0010 train (see Figure 5-1). The Method 0010 consisted of a borosilicate nozzle
that attached directly to a heated borosilicate probe. In order to minimize possible thermal
degradation of the HFPO Dimer Acid, the probe and particulate filter were heated above stacktemperature to minimize water vapor condensation before the filter. The probe was connected
directly to a heated borosilicate filter holder containing a solvent extracted glass fiber filter.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

11

2

5(9(56(7<3(
3,72778%('5<*$60(7(57(03(5$785(
6(16256&21'(16$7(75$3$,57,*+73803%<3$669$/9(

9$&880/,1(,03,1*(5

&+(&.
9$/9(

,&(%$7+

6,/,&$*(/

7(03(5$785(
6(1625,$6'$7$?&+(02856?6?),*85(0(7+2'

0$,1
9$/9(

9$&880*$8*(&21'(16$7(75$3,&(:$7(55(&,5&8/$7,21

5,*,'%2526,/,&$7(78%,1*25)/(;,%/(6$03/(/,1(;$'625%(1702'8/(621($1'7:2,03,1*(567(03(5$785(
6(1625&21'(16(57(03(5$785(
6(1625),*85((3$0(7+2'6$03/,1*75$,125,),&(
0$120(7(525,),&(,&(:$7(55(&,5&8/$7,213803

127(7+(&21'(16(50$<%(326,7,21('+25,=217$//<
7+(;$'625%(1702'8/(:,//$/:$<6%(,1$9(57,&$/326,7,21

+($7('352%(
%87721+22.
12==/(

9(17:$//),/7(5+2/'(5+($7('$5($

A section of borosilicate glass or flexible polyethylene tubing connected the filter holder exit to a
Grahm (spiral) type ice water-cooled condenser, an ice water-jacketed sorbent module containing
approximately 40 grams of XAD-2 resin. The XAD-2 resin tube was equipped with an inlet
temperature sensor. The XAD-2 resin trap was followed by a condensate knockout impinger anda series of two impingers that contained 100 mL of high-purity distilled water. The train also
included a second XAD-2 resin trap behind the impinger section to evaluate possible sampling
train breakthrough. Each XAD-2 resin trap was connected to a 1-liter condensate knockout trap.
The final impinger contained 300 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel. All impingers and thecondensate traps were maintained in an ice bath. Ice water was continuously circulated in thecondenser and the XAD-2 module to maintain method-required temperature. A control consolewith a leakless vacuum pump, a calibrated orifice, and dual inclined manometers was connectedto the final impinger via an umbilical cord to complete the sample train.
HFPO Dimer Acid Fluoride (CAS No. 2062-98-8) that is present in the stack gas is expected tobe captured in the sampling train along with HFPO Dimer Acid (CAS No. 13252-13-6). HFPO
Dimer Acid Fluoride underwent hydrolysis instantaneously in water in the sampling train andduring the sample recovery step, and was converted to HFPO Dimer Acid such that the amountof HFPO Dimer Acid emissions represented a combination of both HFPO Dimer Acid Fluoride
and HFPO Dimer Acid.
During sampling, gas stream velocities were measured by attaching a calibrated S-type pitot tube
into the gas stream adjacent to the sampling nozzle. The velocity pressure differential wasobserved immediately after positioning the nozzle at each traverse point, and the sampling rateadjusted to maintain isokineticity at 100% ± 10. Flue gas temperature was monitored at eachpoint with a calibrated panel meter and thermocouple. Isokinetic test data was recorded at eachtraverse point during all test periods, as appropriate. Leak checks were performed on thesampling apparatus according to reference method instructions, prior to and following each run,component change (if required) or during midpoint port changes.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

13

8/20/2019

5.2.2 EPA Method 0010 Sample Recovery
At the conclusion of each test, the sampling train was dismantled, the openings sealed, and thecomponents transported to the field laboratory trailer for recovery.
A consistent procedure was employed for sample recovery:
1. The two XAD-2 covered (to minimize light degradation) sorbent modules (1 and 2) weresealed and labeled.
2. The glass fiber filter(s) were removed from the holder with tweezers and placed in apolyethylene container along with any loose particulate and filter fragments.
3. The particulate adhering to the internal surfaces of the nozzle, probe and front half of thefilter holder were rinsed with a solution of methanol and ammonium hydroxide into apolyethylene container while brushing a minimum of three times until no visible
particulate remained. Particulate adhering to the brush was rinsed with methanol/ammonium hydroxide into the same container. The container was sealed.
4. The volume of liquid collected in the first condensate trap was measured, the value
recorded, and the contents poured into a polyethylene container.
5. All train components between the filter exit and the first condensate trap were rinsed withmethanol/ammonium hydroxide. The solvent rinse was placed in a separate polyethylene
container and sealed.
6. The volume of liquid in impingers one and two, and the second condensate trap, were
measured, the values recorded, and the sample was placed in the same container as Step 4
above, then sealed.
7. The two impingers, condensate trap, and connectors were rinsed with methanol/ammonium hydroxide. The solvent sample was placed in a separate polyethylene
container and sealed.
8. The silica gel in the final impinger was weighed and the weight gain value recorded.
9. Site (reagent) blank samples of the methanol/ammonium hydroxide, XAD resin, filterand distilled water were retained for analysis.
Each container was labeled to clearly identify its contents. The height of the fluid level was
marked on the container of each liquid sample to provide a reference point for a leakage check
during transport. All samples were maintained cool.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

14

8/20/2019

During the Carbon Bed inlet and outlet test campaign, a Method 0010 blank train was set up near
the test location, leak-checked and recovered along with the respective sample train. Following
sample recovery, all samples were transported to TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. (TestAmerica)
for sample extraction and analysis.
See Figure 5-2 for a schematic of the Method 0010 sample recovery process.
5.2.3 EPA Method 0010 Sample Analysis
Method 0010 sampling trains resulted in four separate analytical fractions for HFPO Dimer Acid
analysis according to SW-846 Method 3542:


Front-half Composite—comprised of the particulate filter, and the probe, nozzle, andfront-half of the filter holder solvent rinses;

Back-half Composite—comprised of the first XAD-2 resin material and the back-half ofthe filter holder with connecting glassware solvent rinses;Condensate Composite—comprised of the aqueous condensates and the contents ofimpingers one and two with solvent rinses;



Breakthrough XAD-2 Resin Tube—comprised of the resin tube behind the series ofimpingers.

The second XAD-2 resin material was analyzed separately to evaluate any possible sampling
train HFPO-DA breakthrough.
The front-half and back-half composites and the second XAD-2 resin material were placed inpolypropylene wide-mouth bottles and tumbled with methanol containing 5% NH4OH for 18
hours. Portions of the extracts were processed analytically for the HFPO dimer acid by liquid
chromatography and duel mass spectroscopy (HPLC/MS/MS). The condensate composite wasconcentrated onto a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge followed by desorption from the
cartridge using methanol. Portions of those extracts were also processed analytically by
HPLC/MS/MS.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

15

8/20/201916

75$16)(5:$6+,1*672
32/<(7+</(1(%277/(/$%(/
6($/$1'0$5./,48,'/(9(/&203/(7(&8672'<)250
6(&85(6$03/($1'.((3&22/

75$16)(5:$6+,1*672
32/<(7+</(1(%277/(/$%(/
6($/$1'0$5./,48,'/(9(/&203/(7(&8672'<)250
6(&85(6$03/($1'.((3&22/),*85(+)32',0(5$&,'6$03/(5(&29(5<352&('85(6)250(7+2'

:$6+:,7+0(7+$12/$0021,80+<'52;,'(,$6'$7$?&+(02856?6?),*85((3$

5(7$,1)255(*(1(5$7,21:(,*+$1'5(&25',03,1*(5123 6,/,&$*(/6($/(1'6:,7+*/$66&$36
&29(5/$%(/&203/(7(&8672'<)2506(&85(6$03/($7$1'.((3&22/

75$16)(5:$6+,1*672
32/<(7+</(1(%277/(/$%(/
6($/$1'0$5./,48,'/(9(/&203/(7(&8672'<)250
6(&85(6$03/($1'.((3&22/),567$1'6(&21'&21'(16$7(75$36$1',03,1*(5126$1'
6$03/()5$&7,21

5(029()520,03,1*(575$,1;$'02'8/(7:2
6$03/()5$&7,21

:$6+:,7+
0(7+$12/$0021,80+<'52;,'(%$&.+$/)),/7(5+2/'(5&211(&7256)/(;,%/(/,1(&21'(16(5
6$03/()5$&7,21

0($685(92/80(2)/,48,'$1'
5(&25'),567$1'6(&21'&21'(16$7(75$36$1',03,1*(5126$1'
6$03/()5$&7,21

:$6+:+,/(%586+,1*:,7+0(7+$12/$0021,80
+<'52;,'(

6($/:$6+,1*6,1/$%(/('
32/<(7+</(1(%277/(0$5.
/,48,'/(9(/&203/(7(&8672'<)2506(&85(6$03/($1'.((3&22/

6($/(1'6:,7+*/$66&$36
&29(5/$%(/&203/(7(&8672'<)2506(&85(6$03/($7$1'.((3&22/

5(029()520,03,1*(575$,16($/,1/$%(/('32/<(7+</(1(%277/(&203/(7(&8672'<)2506(&85(6$03/($1'.((3&22/12==/(352%($1')5217+$/)),/7(5+2/'(56$03/()5$&7,21;$'02'8/(21(
6$03/()5$&7,21

),/7(5
6$03/()5$&7,21Samples were spiked with isotope dilution internal standard (IDA) at the commencement of their
preparation to provide accurate assessments of the analytical recoveries. Final data was corrected
for IDA standard recoveries.
TestAmerica developed detailed procedures for the sample extraction and analysis for HFPO
Dimer Acid. These procedures were incorporated into the test protocol.
5.3 GAS COMPOSITION
The Weston mobile laboratory equipped with instrumental analyzers was used to measure carbon
dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (O2) concentrations. A diagram of the Weston sampling system ispresented in Figure 5-3.
For the VE South stack test campaign, the sample was collected at the exhaust of the Method0010 sampling system. At the end of the line, a tee permitted the introduction of calibration gas.
The sample was drawn through a heated Teflon® sample line to the sample conditioner. The
output from the sampling system was recorded electronically, and one minute averages wererecorded and displayed on a data logger.
Each analyzer was set up and calibrated internally by introduction of calibration gas standards
directly to the analyzer from a calibration manifold. The calibration manifold is designed with anatmospheric vent to release excess calibration gas and maintained the calibration at ambientpressure. The direct calibration sequence consisted of alternate injections of zero and mid-range
gases with appropriate adjustments until the desired responses were obtained. The high-range
standards were then introduced in sequence without further adjustment.
The sample line integrity was verified by performing a bias test before and after each test period.
The sampling system bias test consisted of introducing the zero gas and one up-range calibration
standard in excess to the valve at the probe end when the system was sampling normally. The
excess calibration gas flowed out through the probe to maintain ambient sampling systempressure. Calibration gas supply was regulated to maintain constant sampling rate and pressure.
Instrument bias check response was compared to internal calibration responses to insure sample
line integrity and to calculate a bias correction factor after each run using the ratio of themeasured concentration of the bias gas certified by the calibration gas supplier.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

17

8/20/2019

The oxygen and carbon dioxide content of each stack gas was measured according to EPA
Method 3A procedures which incorporate the latest updates of EPA Method 7E. A Servomex
Model 4900 analyzer (or equivalent) was used to measure oxygen content. A Servomex Model
4900 analyzer (or equivalent) was used to measure carbon dioxide content of the stack gas. Bothanalyzers were calibrated with EPA Protocol gases prior to the start of the test program andperformance was verified by sample bias checks before and after each test run.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

18

8/20/2019

STACK WALL
HEATED FILTERHOLDER OR METHOD
0010 SAMPLE TRAINSAMPLE
CONDITIONINGSYSTEM

HEATEDSAMPLEPROBE

MOISTUREREMOVALVENT

CO2
SAMPLEPUMPO2

CALIBRATION BIAS LINE

19

ANALOG
SIGNALLINEGAS
ANALYZERSCALIBRATIONGASES= ON / OFF VALVECOMPUTER FOR DATAACQUISITION AND
REDUCTIONACQUISITION
INTERFACE

FIGURE 5-5
WESTON SAMPLING SYSTEMIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\FIGURE 5-5 WESTON SAMPLING SYSTEM

6. DETAILED TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Each test was a minimum of 96 minutes in duration. A total of three test runs were performed
simultaneously at each location.
Chemours is continuing to investigate the differences in gas stream velocity and volumetric flow
exiting the carbon bed and exiting the stack.
Tables 6-1 through 6-3 provide detailed test data and test results for the VE South Carbon Bed
inlet, the Carbon Bed outlet and the VE South stack, respectively.
The carbon bed removal efficiency was calculated based upon the HFPO Dimer Acid inlet andoutlet mass emission rates in lb/hr.
The Method 3A sampling on the VE South stack indicated that the O2 and CO2 concentrations
were at ambient air levels (20.9% O2, 0% CO2), therefore, 20.9% O2 and 0% CO2 values wereused in all calculations.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD20

8/20/2019

TABLE 6-1
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
VES CARBON BED INLET
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period

1
VES CBed Inlet
07/16/19
1605-1841

2
VES CBed Inlet
07/17/19
0905-1058

3
VES CBed Inlet
07/17/19
1250-1502

SAMPLING DATA:
Sampling duration, min.
Nozzle diameter, in.
Cross sectional nozzle area, sq.ft.
Barometric pressure, in. Hg
Avg. orifice press. diff., in H2O
Avg. dry gas meter temp., deg F
Avg. abs. dry gas meter temp., deg. R
Total liquid collected by train, ml
Std. vol. of H2O vapor coll., cu.ft.
Dry gas meter calibration factor
Sample vol. at meter cond., dcf

96.0
0.160
0.000140
30.06
0.97
102.0
562
29.5
1.39
1.006650.90996.0
0.160
0.000140
30.09
1.00
93.6
554
28.2
1.33
1.006651.41296.0
0.160
0.000140
30.06
1.02
102.8
563
48.7
2.29
1.006651.767

Sample vol. at std. cond., dscf (1)Percent of isokinetic sampling

48.46999.7

49.741
101.2

49.222
101.1

GAS STREAM COMPOSITION DATA:
CO2, % by volume, dry basis
O2, % by volume, dry basis
N2, % by volume, dry basis
Molecular wt. of dry gas, lb/lb mole
H20 vapor in gas stream, prop. by vol.
Mole fraction of dry gas
Molecular wt. of wet gas, lb/lb mole

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.028
0.972
28.53

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.026
0.974
28.55

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.045
0.955
28.35

GAS STREAM VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW DATA:
Static pressure, in. H2O
Absolute pressure, in. Hg
Avg. temperature, deg. F
Avg. absolute temperature, deg.R
Pitot tube coefficient
Total number of traverse points
Avg. gas stream velocity, ft./sec.
Stack/duct cross sectional area, sq.ft.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, wacf/min.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, dscf/min.

-5.50
29.66
100
560
0.84
24
66.5
7.07
28214
25641

-5.50
29.69
92
552
0.84
24
66.1
7.07
28035
25919

-5.50
29.66
97
557
0.84
24
67.5
7.07
28617
25674

(1)

Standard conditions = 68 deg. F. (20 deg. C.) and 29.92 in Hg (760 mm Hg)*Run 3 conducted prior to Run 2

7/31/2019 10:35 AM

21

071619 VES CB Inlet

TABLE 6-1 (cont.)
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
VES CARBON BED INLETTEST DATA
Run number

1
VES CBed
Inlet
07/16/19
1605-1841

2
VES CBed
Inlet
07/17/19
0905-1058

3
VES CBed
Inlet
07/17/19
1250-1502

LABORATORY REPORT DATA, ug.
HFPO Dimer Acid

47.37

9.79

4.25

EMISSION RESULTS, ug/dscm.
HFPO Dimer Acid

34.51

6.95

3.05

EMISSION RESULTS, lb/dscf.
HFPO Dimer Acid

2.15E-09

4.34E-10

1.90E-10

EMISSION RESULTS, lb/hr.
HFPO Dimer Acid

3.31E-03

6.75E-04

2.93E-04

EMISSION RESULTS, g/sec.
HFPO Dimer Acid

4.17E-04

8.50E-05

3.69E-05

Location
Date
Time period22
7/31/2019 10:35 AM

071619 VES CB Inlet

TABLE 6-2
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
VES CARBON BED OUTLET
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period

1
VES CBed Outlet
07/16/19
1605-1841

2
VES CBed Outlet
07/17/19
0905-1058

3
VES CBed Outlet
07/17/19
1250-1502

SAMPLING DATA:
Sampling duration, min.
Nozzle diameter, in.
Cross sectional nozzle area, sq.ft.
Barometric pressure, in. Hg
Avg. orifice press. diff., in H2O
Avg. dry gas meter temp., deg F
Avg. abs. dry gas meter temp., deg. R
Total liquid collected by train, ml
Std. vol. of H2O vapor coll., cu.ft.
Dry gas meter calibration factor
Sample vol. at meter cond., dcf

96.0
0.202
0.000223
30.06
1.26
104.7
565
34.0
1.60
1.006958.43996.0
0.202
0.000223
30.09
1.31
96.0
556
24.2
1.14
1.006958.94396.0
0.202
0.000223
30.06
1.32
107.1
567
46.4
2.19
1.006959.828Sample vol. at std. cond., dscf (1)Percent of isokinetic sampling

55.42797.3

56.83598.5

56.507
99.2

GAS STREAM COMPOSITION DATA:
CO2, % by volume, dry basis
O2, % by volume, dry basis
N2, % by volume, dry basis
Molecular wt. of dry gas, lb/lb mole
H20 vapor in gas stream, prop. by vol.
Mole fraction of dry gas
Molecular wt. of wet gas, lb/lb mole

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.028
0.972
28.53

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.020
0.980
28.62

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.037
0.963
28.43

GAS STREAM VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW DATA:
Static pressure, in. H2O
Absolute pressure, in. Hg
Avg. temperature, deg. F
Avg. absolute temperature, deg.R
Pitot tube coefficient
Total number of traverse points
Avg. gas stream velocity, ft./sec.
Stack/duct cross sectional area, sq.ft.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, wacf/min.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, dscf/min.

2.40
30.24
100
560
0.84
24
48.0
9.39
27061
25043

2.40
30.27
98
558
0.84
24
47.9
9.39
27013
25357

2.40
30.24
100
560
0.84
24
48.5
9.39
27311
25032

(1)

Standard conditions = 68 deg. F. (20 deg. C.) and 29.92 in Hg (760 mm Hg)*Run 3 conducted prior to Run 2

7/31/2019 10:39 AM

23071619 VES CB Out

TABLE 6-2 (cont.)
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
VES CARBON BED OUTLETTEST DATA
Run number

1

2

3

VES CBed Outlet

VES CBed Outlet

VES CBed Outlet

07/16/19
1605-1841

07/17/19
0905-1058

07/17/19
1250-1502

LABORATORY REPORT DATA, ug.
HFPO Dimer Acid

7.99

2.30

2.65

EMISSION RESULTS, ug/dscm.
HFPO Dimer Acid

5.09

1.43

1.65

EMISSION RESULTS, lb/dscf.
HFPO Dimer Acid

3.18E-10

8.94E-11

1.03E-10

EMISSION RESULTS, lb/hr.
HFPO Dimer Acid
HFPO Dimer Acid (From Inlet Data)

4.78E-04
3.31E-03

1.36E-04
6.75E-04

1.55E-04
2.93E-04

EMISSION RESULTS, g/sec.
HFPO Dimer Acid

6.01E-05

1.71E-05

1.95E-05

85.6

79.8

47.1

Location
Date
Time period

Carbon Bed Removal Efficiency, %24
7/31/2019 10:39 AM

071619 VES CB Out

TABLE 6-3
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
VE SOUTH STACK
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period

1
VE South Stack
07/16/19
1605-1841

2
VE South Stack
07/17/19
0905-1058

3
VE South Stack
07/17/19
1250-1502

SAMPLING DATA:
Sampling duration, min.
Nozzle diameter, in.
Cross sectional nozzle area, sq.ft.
Barometric pressure, in. Hg
Avg. orifice press. diff., in H2O
Avg. dry gas meter temp., deg F
Avg. abs. dry gas meter temp., deg. R
Total liquid collected by train, ml
Std. vol. of H2O vapor coll., cu.ft.
Dry gas meter calibration factor
Sample vol. at meter cond., dcf

96.0
0.190
0.000197
30.00
0.79
98.5
558
45.5
2.1
1.000850.91096.0
0.190
0.000197
30.07
0.79
87.9
548
45.1
2.1
1.000849.52596.0
0.190
0.000197
30.07
0.76
99.0
559
41.9
2.0
1.000850.263Sample vol. at std. cond., dscf (1)Percent of isokinetic sampling

48.374106.3

48.079105.3

47.822105.2

GAS STREAM COMPOSITION DATA:
CO2, % by volume, dry basis
O2, % by volume, dry basis
N2, % by volume, dry basis
Molecular wt. of dry gas, lb/lb mole
H20 vapor in gas stream, prop. by vol.
Mole fraction of dry gas
Molecular wt. of wet gas, lb/lb mole

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.042
0.958
28.38

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.042
0.958
28.38

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.040
0.960
28.41

GAS STREAM VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW DATA:
Static pressure, in. H2O
Absolute pressure, in. Hg
Avg. temperature, deg. F
Avg. absolute temperature, deg.R
Pitot tube coefficient
Total number of traverse points
Avg. gas stream velocity, ft./sec.
Stack/duct cross sectional area, sq.ft.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, wacf/min.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, dscf/min.

2.50
30.18
100
560
0.84
24
44.1
9.62
25447
23157

2.50
30.25
97
557
0.84
24
43.9
9.62
25348
23242

2.50
30.25
100
560
0.84
24
43.8
9.62
25293
23134

(1)

Standard conditions = 68 deg. F. (20 deg. C.) and 29.92 in Hg (760 mm Hg)

25
7/31/2019 10:47 AM

071619 VES stackTABLE 6-3 (cont.)
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
VE SOUTH STACKTEST DATA
Run number
Location
Date
Time period

1

2

3

VE South Stack

VE South Stack

VE South Stack

07/16/19
1605-1841

07/17/19
0905-1058

07/17/19
1250-1502

LABORATORY REPORT DATA, ug.
HFPO Dimer Acid

3.80802.69501.9560EMISSION RESULTS, ug/dscm.
HFPO Dimer Acid

2.78

1.98

1.44

EMISSION RESULTS, lb/dscf.
HFPO Dimer Acid

1.74E-10

1.24E-10

9.02E-11

EMISSION RESULTS, lb/hr.
HFPO Dimer Acid

2.41E-04

1.72E-04

1.25E-04

EMISSION RESULTS, g/sec.
HFPO Dimer Acid

3.04E-05

2.17E-05

1.58E-05

26
8/16/2019 11:32 AM

071619 VES stackAPPENDIX APROCESS OPERATIONS DATAIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

27

8/20/2019

Date: 7/16/19
Time
Stack Testing
VES Product

1500

1600

1700

1800

RUN 1: 1605 - 1841
PM/PE

VES Precursor
VES
Condensation(HFPO)VES ABR (East)
Burnout

VES ABR (West)VES Refining
VES WGS
Recirculation
Flow
Dimer ISOventing

18500 kg/h

28

1900

Date: 7/17/19
Time

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

RUN 2: 0905 - 1058

Stack Testing

PM/PE

VES Product
VES Precursor
VES
Condensation(HFPO)VES ABR (East)
VES ABR (West)VES Refining
VES WGS
Recirculation
Flow
Dimer ISOventing

1400
RUN 3: 1250 - 1502

Burnout

18500 kg/h

29

1500

1600

APPENDIX B
RAW AND REDUCED TEST DATAIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD30

8/20/2019

Sample and Velocity Traverse Point Data Sheet -Method 1
ClientL/~lXi/"~~~~j~Ci

Loaction/Plant

C~

SourceDuct Type.
Traverse Type

Date

~~

❑ Circular~ Particulate Traverse

j'~!l :,.~~~ ..

Operator~❑~.i b '~

W.O. Number~nmcate epproprlete type

Rectangular Duct
Velocity Traverse❑ CEM Traverse

Distance from far wall to outside of port in. = C,

Flow Disturbances

Port De th in. = D
De th of Duct, diameter in. = C-D

U stream -Aft
Downstream - B ft
U stream - A duct diameters

Area of Duct ft
Total Traverse Points
Total Traverse Points

p

Downstream - B duct diametersr PortPort Diameter in. —Flan e-Threaded-HoleMonorail Len th
Rectan ular Ducts Onl

Diagram of Stack

Width of Duct, rectan ular duct onl in.
Total Ports rectan ular duct onl
E uivalent Diameter = 2'L'W L+W

~~~

~~

3~~

}

Traverse Point Locations
Traverse
Point°~ of Duct0

Distance from
Inside Duct Distance from Outside ofWall in
Port in

~~

l
~~//

z

O6

3

~

~W
L

4
5

~

s
~

fb

D

.~
•~~ rrrL

7~~' 77 2
0
G

a

i~

/„J`2

'Is

s

.'oa

~

,Js3

9

3

Duct Diameters Upstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance A)~ Z
3. 3L•~

r 1/

~2

Z

0.167

2

0.50

3

a.e.~
t

~

MlnlmumNienberof

e

}

~

ParUalate Treverse Po~nisd.~.w~

24 (cFnder) 25 (reclenpuler duct )
r~

20

3
Traverse Poirrts for Vebdty

CEA1 3 Pdnl(Lonp Msasurmart Llne) SUaUfieaton Polk Locations

1

,,,

40

~

~ 5~ 3

CJ 3 .~~s

Shack Dfameter> 24 inches

r

~

11

t.0

nF

~s
12

1O

e l~ra~.)o Gmwwr)(Dlstwbance =Bend, Expansion, Contracfbn, e[c.)0.833si.a~ a.«~ywr.uor.~z - z~ xd..

IVOi6: R SSBCK OI8 ~ 1Z If7C~ U58 tF'A MBi~Otl 1A(Sample port upsVeam of pitot port)
Note: If stack die >24" Uien adjust traverse point to 1 inch hom wall
If stack die <24" then adJust Vaverse point to 0.5 Inch from wall

2

3

4

5

6

7

B

9

Dud Dl~nefers Dowretream fiom Flow DlsWrbence (Distance B)■OOOOOOOOOmmm~_~_~_~_m~ra_~_m■OOO~OO~O~mm~

0~-~~~~~~~~~~~---~~~Cii-~-~-~~---~---li67_~~~m----__---_-~~Ti
m~-__~~-~~~-~J~im~~~~~~~~~~~~

3110,`+ g.Sample and Velocity Traverse Point Data Sheet -Method 1
''
f~Vr1

ClientSourceDuCtType
Traverse TypeV❑

Operator

i
- ~
~

Ltw

Loaction/Plant

Date

ly~
❑
❑

CircularParticulate Traverse

Distance from far wall to outside of port in. = C

W.O. Number~"d~ca~ea~P`°P"e~ery~eRectangular Duct
Velocity Traverse❑ CEM Traverse~ `~Port De th in. = D
De th of Duct, diameter in. = C-D~' j ~~ T

Flow Disturbances~

U stream - A ft
Downstream - B ft
U stream - A duct diameters

Area of Duct ft
Total Traverse Points

Downstream - B duct diameters

Total Traverse Points er Port
Port Diameter in. —Flan e-Threaded-HoleDiagram of Stack

Monorail Len th
Rectan ular Ducts Onl
Width of Duct, rectan ular duct onl in.
Total Ports rectan ular duct onl
E uivalent Diameter = 2`L'W L+W

/1

~3̀
d/
~~

Traverse Point LocationsirlDistance from
Traverse
Inside Duct Distance from Outside of
Point% of Duct
Wall in
Port
1

~~

bb

z
3

~~
_-+

7
~[. ~

~Z7

q

~ TU

1

C

Duct Diameters Upstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance A)

1P~

1.0

~ 0.5

5

1.5

2.0

7F

/~

s
~

~
r
~ ~~f

8

~

9

r~~

~ ~~
~
$

~
~

0

2~

~ `z

Stack Diameter> 24 inches

d.+~
f

—

—

A

i ~.m.,,,
e

MlNmum Number of}PaNculale Traverse Poirhsa~~

24 (cFcWer) 25 (ractergWer duck )

11

~

s~~

l
20

12

/

t_

zo

1

0.167

2

0.50

3

0.833

16

Traverse Polrris for VebcFly

CEM 3 Poinl(Long MaasurmoM Lins) Strati8caton Point Locations

iz
10 —

e Idremu)u I~.~anwir)(Disturtence =Bend, E~ension, CoM~actbn, Mc.)six d.~, eaW.r«na. -,a - z, y,a».

rvote: IT stack aka < lz mch use tNA Methotl 1A(Sample port upsVeam of pilot port)
Note: If stack dia >24" then adjust traverse point to 1 inch from wall
If stack dfa <24' then adjust traverse point to 0.5 inch from wall

o

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Duct Di~netera Dowrretream from Fbw Dlshabance (Distance B)■OOOOOOOOOmmm■OO~OOOOO~m~~0

f:73i~~—~_~—~_m0_--~_~~-~—~~a-~~~~_~-~'ii_~—i~SJ_~I

D~fC9:~ ° ~ ~~:i•ir+w•a~~~~~~

m~~_---~—_~—~
m_—_----_---~!
~'
m~~-~----~ifQ~~--------m~~m
m~_-------~~~~
m----------~~'.
m--__~--__--m

32

~~~

10

CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
INPUTS FOR HFPO DIMER ACID CALCULATIONSVES CARBON BED INLET
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period
Operator

Inputs For Calcs.
Sq. rt. delta P
Delta H
Stack temp. (deg.F)
Meter temp. (deg.F)
Sample volume (act.)
Barometric press. (in.Hg)
Volume H2O imp. (ml)Weight change sil. gel (g)
% CO2
% O2
% N2
Area of stack (sq.ft.)
Sample time (min.)Static pressure (in.H2O)
Nozzle dia. (in.)
Meter box cal.
Cp of pitot tube
Traverse points

1
VES CBed Inlet
07/16/19
1605-1841
JDO/NG2
VES CBed Inlet
07/17/19
0905-1058
KA/NG

3
VES CBed Inlet
07/17/19
1250-1502
KA/NG

1.13927
0.966399.6
102.0
50.909
30.06
12.0
17.5
0.0
20.9
79.1
7.068
96.0
-5.50
0.160
1.00660.84
241.14111
0.998891.7
93.6
51.412
30.09
10.0
18.2
0.0
20.9
79.1
7.068
96.0
-5.50
0.160
1.00660.84
241.154411.017197.1
102.8
51.767
30.06
25.0
23.7
0.0
20.9
79.1
7.068
96.0
-5.50
0.160
1.00660.84
2433

Determination of Stack Gas Velocity -Method 2
Client~r

LocadoNP~l~~tOperator

Source

~

Date

.Pi

l

`

!~- `~,. ~ _ W.O. Number~rqr- Jviv
Run Number-~~n~
71me ~~~~i~o,Barometric Press, in Hp (Pb~
Static Press, In HZO (Pstatic)•

Pftot Coeff(Cp)~ tl`~~
Stack Area, ft' (As)PltotTube/ThermoID~~ p rv~ ~Source Moisture, %(BWS)~~~~
Ox. ~~
COZ, Yx
Cyclonic Flow
Determinatfon
Angle
Delta P ffi yeilding zero
DeltaP
O°

:: ~

....

I

.:

....

I

,-

:. ,...

Traverse Location

Port

Point

~-

•

~~7~I~~ ° '

~I~~

~~
~~~~~~I--I-,-Qi~,~l-_I-`I--I-•~ ~--I-_
I~~~~~I--I--~~I--I-_~~~~~~I--I-_~~'
I~~~1~I--I--

I~i
~~
w
~
i
~l~-I-~~I~~~~~I--I--~~I--I-~ii-I~'~I--I-_

Avg Angle ~ ~ ~~,~

Avg. Delta P 8 Temp~~~--I
~

~
I

~~
I

Average gas stream velocity, fUaec,
Vol. flow rate ~ actual conditions, wacf/min;*iaVol. flow rate at standard conditions, dscflmin~~I

MUVd = (0.32 • oz1+(o ~a • ~oZ?+(o.za • (~ao - (coz+oz)1)
MWs = ~MINd' ~1-~BVRIS/100~}~+ ~1B' ~8W51100~~~

Tsa = TS+480
Pa = Pb+ (Pstatid13.6~~~/,,,,,,///~~

Vs = 85.49' Cp"avg DelteP ` 7as! Ps" MWs~

Qs(act}= 80' Vs' As~~

MWd =Dry molecular weight source gas, Ih/I~mole.
MWs =Wet molecular weight source gas, Ibllb-mole.
Tsa =Source Temperature, absolute(oR)
Ps =Absolute stack stffiic pressure, inches Hg.
Vs =Average gas stream vebaty, fl/sec.
Qs(act) = Volumetric fbw rate of wel stack gas at actual, wad/min
Qs(std) = VolumeUic fbw rate of dry stack gas at standard
conditions, dsd/min

Qs(std} = 17.64 •(1- (6V1I5/ 100))" (Ps/Tse )' Qa(act)Note: Micromanometer fs required if:(A) The average Delta P readings are less than 0.05 Inches of water.
(B) For traverses of 12 or more poirrts, more than 10% of the Delta P readings are bebw 0.05 inches of water.
(C) For traverses of less then 12 points, more than one Delta P readings is bebw 0.05 inches of water.

i~~
method2.xis

y / ,

(/l/
_ _

34

4
~~~~
~~ti

1

`
ISOKINETIC FIELD DATA SHEETCi(entw.o.#Project ID
Mode/Source ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/Location
SamPle Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operatorcuemo~Ks
isa~a.002.016
Chemours
Carbon Bed
IN
1
M0010
,y8JUL2019
VE Soutlt '" CHInlet'

A„
1 ~ t f_j'
Y-b~•i--/'r-t'

O~'

Stack Conditions
Assumed%Moisture
Impinger Vol (ml)Silica gel (g)CO2, % by Vol'
02, % by Vol?
Temperature (°F)
Meter Temp ("F)
Static Press (in HZO) ''a~
EPA Method 00~3 ~'nl~- R 1- HF O

imer Acid

Page

Meter Box ID

Actual

~,
~ ~
4
~

y

Metersox v

V

Meter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pftot /Thermocouple ID
Pftot Coefficient
Noale ID
oule Measurements
Avg NonJe Dfa (in)

~

~ of

'~

K Factory "ZInitial

Mid-Point

Final;Sample Train (ft3)

O.B4

—~

Area of Stack (ft~)
Ambient Temp (°F)_~~_Sample Time
Total Traverse Pts

(Q

~j~j

~f
J

~~~~
lj
~~~~i~L~~
I Leak Check @ (in Hg)»~~
Pitot leak check good
Pitot Inspection good~~~~~~~►, ' .
`i Method 3 System good 6~Q Temp Checkric-i cai .~cirVJI- I CJI JGIMeter Box Temp
Reference Tamp
Pass/Fail (+/- zo~~yqb /Fall
Pess /Fall
Temp Change Responsenoyes / no

L~ ~3

.~

ti

Av

tta P
~rt

A

tt H

a P ~v~Sgrt~~H Comments:r~"

Total Vowme

Av Ts

J

Av Tm

MINMau~~

Min/MauMax

Mau Vac

MIn1Maz

EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846~~ o~~,~~+1 °j, ~,'7 Lys,~e4~ ~~~~~-~~ t ~ 'N~.1 ~''`,~
35o~d~ ~{~,).S T ~~.~6!4 - ~:~~S , ~t l~~ ,~l4-

~,n~(
N~~~

~,~v7 col,

ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEETEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid

Clientw.o.#

Chemours~saia.00z.pls

Meter Box ID
Meteraox Y

Protect ID

Chemours

Mode/Source ID
Samp. Loc. (DRun No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/LocaUon

Carbon Bed
IN
2
M0010
15JUL2019
VE Spulh C

Sample Date
Baro. Press ((n Hg)
Operator~

SteCk Conditions
AssumedActualPage~of~„3, pa

K Factor ~13%Moisture

Meter Box Del H

Impinger Vol (ml)Silica gel (g)CO2, % by Vol{~
02, °/a by Vol
Temperature (°F)~
' Meter Temp (F)
~j~
~ '~,

Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pitot / Thertnocrouple ID
Pitot Ccefflcient
NoaJe ID
Noale Measurements

StaHc Press (fn HZO)l~

Avg Noale Dia (In)Meter Box Temp

AmWent Temp (°F)

g`7Area of Stack (RZ)
Sample Time
Total Traverse Pts

Reference Temp
Pass/Fail (+/- 2°J~
Temo Chance Response 5

Zj C,+ >''Initial
Mid-Point
Sample Train (ft')/~' .~ ~ ~Leak Check @ (in Hg)
Pitot leak check good
Pftot Inspectlon good~~~~~~
Method 3 System goodos - I es
Temp Check
yre-Tes e■c~r;~~~r>~

~
e

'
d

Pess /Fellyes / noPass / FaH
ves ! nov

36'~.bfol~j.o 10 1..7 ,~iJ.~_~_~"g~~o ~seISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEETEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Dimer AcidclientMeter Box ID
Metersox v
Meter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pitot /Thermocouple ID
Pftot Coefftcient
Noale ID
Noale Measurements
Avg Noale Dia (in)w.o.#Project ID
Mode/Source ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/Location
Sample Date
Baro. Press (In Hg)~,
Operator

chemau~s

Stack Conditions

lsata.002;n9s
Chemours
Carbon Bed
IN
3
M0010
15JUL2019v ; aouth C8 i[NetAssumedActual%Moisture
Impinger Vol (ml)Silica gel (9)CO2, % by Vol~. f~02, % by Vol''),,~,
Temperature (°FJ
j pff
~"~„
Meter Temp ("F)''~ 7~
Static Press (in HZO)
~ — ~5~'f

Q~Ambient Temp (°F)

K Factor~„~p~a
C
'

0.84
,

9
~

Area of Stack (ftZ)
Sample Time
Total Traverse Pts; a~Page ~ of L
~ `7}
J
c
Mid-Point

Initial
Final
Sample Train (ft3)~ .~~~~~d//l5ll~~jLeak Check ~ (in Hg) ~~~~
Pitot leak check good~~~~~~
Pitot Inspection good
Method 3 System good ~~~~rZ_Temp Checkre- es eos - I es 2
Mater Box Temp
Reference Temp
Pass/Fail (+/- 2°~
Pass /Fail
Pecs /Fall
Temp Change Response S
yes / noyea / no

~~
~'

O

I

,-,

fl

7~i~~~~Rt~El,►:~~A[.
~wl~s~iA 1~f 'L'~airf~~f~~i~~i~~~Ms~~GI`;~fG~~iyi; ~~~~7r~~~'~~L'~i~~(ilr~~T~~~~~~~~~[~~i►~i:~~~~~~~ICj~~~l~~~~~i4
7i~t~i~~~~~i~[~~i~i
i
t~~
..
~~
J,

37
~ ~.v.
__ _~.~.. ._~._..m.
.,

SAMPLE RECOVERY FIELD DATAEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid
ClientLocation/Plant

Chemours
Fayetteville, NC

W.O. #

15418.002.016
VE South c:a i~~or

Source &Location

Run No.

1

Sample Date ~~'~ ~~ {~ ~Recovery Date 7 "` ~~~Sample I.D.

Chemours -Carbon Bed - IN -1 - M0o10 -AnalystFilter Number

Im in er
5

1

2

3

Contents

Empty

HPLC H2O

HPLC H2O

Final

~~

~~~'J

-Q~

~

~
,
t

Initial

~

100

100

~

300

Gain

~

~

0

Impinger Color

~`

4

6

7

Imp.Total

8

Total

Silica GelO/~ ~i,~

Labeled?

Silica Gel Condition

Sealed?

Run No.

2

Sample Date ~ 17 1 GJ

Sample I.D.

Chemours -Carbon Bed - IN - 2 - M0o10 -AnalystRecovery Date ~J~~j

Im in er5Filter Number

1
Empty

2
HPLC H2O

3
HPLC H2O

4

Contents
Final

0

e~~

+7 71

Q

~~~

Initial

~

100

100

D

300

Gain

b

~

Impinger Color

~_

6

7

Imp.Total•`~

8
Silica Gel

Total

i

.~

Cyl

~1,~

/ ~~

Labeled?

~Silica Gel Condition

Sealed?

Run No.

3

Sample Date-~~ySample I.D.

Chemours -Carbon Bed - IN - 3 - Moo10 -AnalystRecovery Date~

Impin er5Filter Number

Contents

1
Empty

2
HPLC H2O

Final

~

~

~

~

~f~~
► i

Initial

Q

100

100

~

300

Gain
Impinger Color~

3
HPLC H2O

4~

Check COC for Sample IDs of Media Blanks

7

Imp.Total

8
Silica Gel

Total

y'pi~

C(, ` ~/

Silica Gel Condition

6

Labeled?
~ /Sealed?

~.

38

l/

~~

SAMPLE RECOVERY FIELD DATA
ClientLocation/Plant
Run No.

~~

S

~

vim-

k.L~,~

Sample I.D.
1

2

3

W.O. #
Source &Location

~.~—

y~

~

Sample Date~~~~,~

Recovery Date ~~' ~~"'

)r+7

AnalystIm in er5aS~

Filter Number

6

7

4

Imp.Total

Contents

8

Total

Sil(ca Gel

Final

~

Initial

~

Gain

~

~

9~

~

~

~

Impinger Color

~

~

3~''~
~~~

(~

~

~

7C

Labeled?

Silica Gel Condition

Sealed?

Run No.

Sample Date

Recovery Date

Sample I.D.

AnalystIm in er5Filter Number

1

2

3

4

6

7

Imp.Total

Contents

8

Total

Silica Gel

Final
InitialGain
Impinger Color

Labeled?

Silica Gel Condition

Sealed?

Run No.

Sample Date

Recovery Date

Sample I.D.

AnalystIm in er5Filter Number

1

2

3

4

Contents

6

7

Imp.Total

8
Silica Gel

Final
InitialGain
Impinger Color

Labeled?

Silica Gel Condition

Sealed?

Check COC for Sample IDs of Media Blanks

39

Total

CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
INPUTS FOR HFPO DIMER ACID CALCULATIONSVES CARBON BED OUTLET
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period
Operator

Inputs For Calcs.
Sq. rt. delta P
Delta H
Stack temp. (deg.F)
Meter temp. (deg.F)
Sample volume (act.)
Barometric press. (in.Hg)
Volume H2O imp. (ml)Weight change sil. gel (g)
% CO2
% O2
% N2
Area of stack (sq.ft.)
Sample time (min.)Static pressure (in.H2O)
Nozzle dia. (in.)
Meter box cal.
Cp of pitot tube
Traverse points

1
VES CBed Outlet
07/16/19
1605-1841
JM

2
VES CBed Outlet
07/17/19
0905-1058
JM

3
VES CBed Outlet
07/17/19
1250-1502
JM

0.830051.2600100.2
104.7
58.439
30.06
20.0
14.0
0.0
20.9
79.1
9.390
96.0
2.40
0.202
1.00690.84
240.83224
1.3092
97.6
96.0
58.943
30.09
10.0
14.2
0.0
20.9
79.1
9.390
96.0
2.40
0.202
1.00690.84
240.83619
1.3200100.3
107.1
59.828
30.06
30.0
16.4
0.0
20.9
79.1
9.390
96.0
2.40
0.202
1.00690.84
24

40

.~.,,..

Determination of Stack Gas Velocity -Method 2

Client~%r ``r"" '7

LocaUoNPlant~

Operator

Source~ / ~Pltot Coeff (Cp)Date

Stack Area, ft2 (As)p~
W.O. Numbern.

Pitot Tube/Thermo ID

I/

Run NumberTime ~~'~ry>~~
Barometric Press, In Hg (Pb)~~~~~

Static Press, in H=0 (PataUc)
Source Moisture, •ti (BWS) ~~1~~~z~ '/o~'.OZ~ °~i~

Cyclonic Flow
Detertnlnatlon
Angle
Dana P at yeilding zero
Deka PO°~~r.

Traverse Location

Port

I~~I

~~
Pant ~~I~~~~•~</~~~~
J~~,~~I--I--~'~~~~Lt~~l-_I--,
Il~At~~~~--I-~~~~~-S7~~I-~
O~I-~~~~~~~~'~~Q~-~~~Q~~~~~r~~~~~_~~~~~'~~~~~jl~ir~~rlr.~i~~i~~ir~s~arrr~i~~i~~ir~~~~i~~i~~i ~ - rr~i~~i~~j
Avg Angle ~'[',~~~-I-_I--

Avg Delta P &Temp

1 i j~
Average gas stream velocity, fUsec. .~~~j:~~~~~r~Vol. flow rate ~ actual. condlUons, wacf/min
Vol. flow rate at standard conditions, dscflmin.~'~E.~ai.~:~~1

MWd = (x.32' 02~+ (4 A4' COq~+ 0.28 `(100 - (CO2+~ Z~~~~.~,,~1~I

MWd =Dry molecular weight souroe gas, Ibllb-mole.
MWs =Wet molecular weight source gas, IbAb-mole.
Tsa =Source Temperature, absolute(oR)
Ps =Absolute stack static pressure, inches Hg.
Vs =Average gas stream vabcity, ft/sec.
Qs(act) = VolumeVic fbw rate of wet stack gas at actual, wacf/min
Qs(std) = Volumetric ibw rate of dry stack gas at standard
conditions, dscflmin

MWs = {MWd' ~1-{BVVS/1Qp~~~+ ~18' ~BWS1100~}

Tsa = Ts+48t1
Ps = Pb+ ~Pstatid13.6~
Vs = 85.48 "Cp"avg DelteP ' Tse! Ps"AAVIIa
Qs(aet~= 80' Vs' As
Qs(std) S 17.64 `(1— (BWS/100)) "(Pslfae }" Cas(ect)Note: Micromanometer is required ff:(A) The average Deka P readings are less than 0.05 inches of water.
(B) Fa traverses of 12 or more points, more than 10% of the Deka P readings are bebw 0.05 inches of water.
(C) For Vaverses of less than 12 points, more than one Detta P readings is bebw D.OS inches of ovate.

~~~~method2.xls

41

~~ ,
~~~

~~

ISOKINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
ct,ena,rs~5a~a.ofla.o~s

Clientw.o:#
Pr e~Ct ID
M~e/Source ID
Sa~ip. Loc. ID
Rurj No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/Location
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg
Operator

Chemours
Carhon Bed
OUT
1
M0010
15JUL2019
VE quth . C6 pugeG'7~~

EPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid

Stack Conditions
Assumed°/a Moisture
Impinger Vol (ml)Silica gel (g)CO2, % by Vol
02, °/a by Vol
Temperature (°F)
Meter Temp ("F)~/'

Meter Box ID

Actual~Metereox rMeter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pitot /Thermocouple ID
Pitot Coefficient
Noale ID
Noale Measurements-,+,qvg NonJe Dia (in)~~Static Press (in H2O) #I~~ ~.
,~(5`~`
Ambient Temp (°F) ;~Pam t of~t'

K Factor~ •?

Initial

Mid-Poin

Sample Train (k')
Boro~Leak Check @ (in Hg)
Pitot leak check good
Pitot InspecBon good
Method 3 System good
Temp Check
Meter Box Temp

0.84

.1,(~'L~~~°~ Area of Stack (ft2)
Sample Time
Total Traverse Pts;~

Reference Temp
Pass/Fail (+/- 2°)~
Temp Change Responsei~~~~i.~`—~~~~~~~~~7~~l~z~~~~1~7

noyea / no/ ra
yes / no/ no
yes / nore- est Set

/ rp
/ no
/ no
Post-Test et

/ FaA
/ no

s /Falle / no'ye0'~~ 1 1i7

I ~~sS[ I 3.

~—

Avg Delta P
Avg Sgrt Delfa P

Avg peof I

u

Avg TsAv Tm

MiNMax

Min/Max

Avg Sgrt Del H Comments:~l M ..
~~r

J

Mau

Mau Vac

MiNMauEPA Method 0010 fro~PA SW-846~ ~ ~~~

11lJw

y

42

I

I~~~«I~~~1 ~F3~LJ
o~i~~r~~~~I~E7~~C~~C~.~~o

~ /f

Final
,

;~

'

ISOKINETIC FIELD DATA SHEETEPA Metho

Clientw.o.#Meter Box ID

chernourai sal a.00z.oas

ProJ~ct ID
Mot /Source ID
Sam. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/LocaUon
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator

Chemours
Carbon Bed
OUT
2
M0010
15JUL2019
VE $ t#h C8 Outlet')

Stack Conditions
Assumed%Moisture
Impinger Vol (ml)Silica gel (g)CO2, % by Vol
02, % by Vol
Temperature (°F)
Meter Temp ("F)$tatic Press (in HZOy,~ .
~~Actual'"L~ ~~T~~ ~~1~ FIFPO Dimer Acid

NoaJe Measurements
Avg Noale Dia (in)Area of Stack (flz)iAmbient Temp (°F)

of

K Factor ,~nneter sox r
Meter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pitot /Thermocouple ID ~Pitot Coefficient
Noale ID

('
0~

Page

~

Sample Train (ft3)
Leak Check @ (fn Hg)
Pitot leak check good
Pitot Inspection good
Method 3 System good

Born
0.84

~~

Sample Time
Total Traverse Pts

~.

/ Lp

~ ,"~j~.

Temp Check
Meter Box Temp
Reference Temp~
Pass/Fail (+/- 2°)
Temp Change Responsei

Initial~~U ~Mid-Point
:C~

Fina

e
no
e / noenoyes / noyes / noyes / noe ! ro/ noe / noPre-Test et

ye

/Fail
/ no

Z

oz`si.~r~~rrfir~~y~~r~~~~i~ifl~1[~l>i~~fL~~"L~~~«.i~E~i*~~j~i~'~~V~nai[a ~
rev ~ n~~ o[a~ volume
.~
t~
~
/
4~~ ~ P 1 ~ ~~~~ Com ents: _ 1~vi

Hvg ~ ~,

~vvg 7 m ~nnn~NMaMinlMa~c
EPA Method X010 from EPA SW-846"I I . ~043~g,~; 3~~
7L~ '~J

Post- est Set

y

/Feu
/ no

~~~✓~ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
Cifentw.o,#
ProJ~ct ID
Mock/Source ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/Location
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator-

ctemour~~5g18.092.D16
Chemours
Carbon Bed
OUT
3
M~010
15JUL2019
VE
CB QuNgt.

EPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid

Stack Conditions
Assumed°/ Moisture
Impinger Vol (ml)Silica gel (g)CO2, % by Vol
02, % by Vol
Temperature (°F)
Meter Temp ("F)
Static Press (fn H2O)

Actual
_
_

,~)
;
~
r
--~~~

Ambient Temp (°F)

Meter Box ID~/~/~(~—
Metereox v~~p~64
Meter Box Del H~
Probe ID / Lertgth
Probe Material~
Born
Pitot /Thermocouple ID;
Pitot Coefflc(ent0.84
Noale IDp
NoaJe Measurements~~Fi~
qvg Noale Dia (in).~Q.,
Area of Stack (ft2)—~~_
Sample Tima
Total Traverse Pts

Page

,

r
I of

K Factor
Initial
Mid-Point
Final
Sample Train (ft3)~ ~ ~r(~,~ , ~~+Leak Check @ (in Hg)~' dPitot leak check goode / noyes / no/ no
Pitot Inspection good/ no
yes / no/ rb
Method 3 System goode / noyea / no~~Temp Check
Pre-Test Set
Post-Test etMeter Box Temp~•~
Reference Temp~
~ ~Pass/Fall (+/- 2°~
!
/Fail
/Fail
Temp Change Response 5
ye / noye (no

o
-LZ9

_

J

_ _

~~~~~I!~~~~~1'f~i~~~t~~~It~~~".
R~~~'~~~mac. ~~~i~~~'+~51
i~O[~'~i~V~ir~r r ~I3~~~I~~~~r .~~G~t~lJ~

Ir'i~lli~~~~l~ir'~'i!~ ~ : ~~i~

_

1
",V~v

f ~, iG^i~7

Avg

~e

89

_o

•

fl

~~~~

Avg~Tm
.
i

J

f ob
x

'y'

M(NMax

iNMax

IiS
M~

:cJ

Mau Vac~MIax

EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846

44) ~ '~ ~IiG~-J■«f~I~A~i~i~fi~~Q~,_t~~ S_ ~,~ ~~~~~SAMPLE RECOVERY FIELD DATAEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid

Chemours
Fayetteville, Nc

Cllefit
Location/Plant

W.O. #
Source &Location

15418.002.016
vE south Cs outlet

Run No.

1

Sample Date 7 ~/ ~~~ ~Recovery Date ?~ ~ ~~Sample I.D.

Chemours -Carbon Bed -OUT - 1 - Moo10 -AnalystFilter Number

Contents

1

2

3

Empty

HPLC H2O

HPLC H2O

O

~/~

6

7

Im in er
5

4

Imp.Total

8

~

'0

Q0

~

1

Initial

~

goo

goo

~

soo

~

~

Impinger Colori~ (/Silica Gel Condition

~''~

Q

Labeled?

v

Sealed?

s

Run No.

2

Sample Date

Sample I.D.

Chemours -Carbon Bed -OUT - 2 - Moo10 -AnalystContents

1
Empty

2
HPLC H2O

3
HPLC H2O

Final

~

~0

O~

Initial

v

100

100

Gain

~~

a

Impinger Color
Silica Gel Condition

Ot ~
) ~
l..~G

Im in er
5

4

6

Recovery Date~'~~~"~~yFifter Number~--

7

Imp.Total~~~ D

Labeled?

~/Sealed?

J

3

Sample Date ~~` ~~~~

Sample I.D.

Chemours -Carbon Bed -OUT - 3 - M0010 -Analyst3
HPLC H2O

Final

~0

l'~

~ ~b

Initial

~

100

100

~

~

~

~

Total

6

7

/ .~

Filter Number

Imp.Total

8
Silica Gel
!~!~
300

~

Impinger Color(ill ~

Labeled?

Silica Gel Condition~

Sealed?

Check COC for Sample IDs of Media Blanks

45

~`~

~~

Recovery Date~" { ~~~~Impin er
542HPLC H2O

8
Silica Gel

300
a

1
Empty

~

~'~i~'' ~~'vContents`~~

Run No.

Gain

Total

Silica Gel

Final
Gain

~~

l L.

~/~"'
Total

CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
INPUTS FOR HFPO DIMER ACID CALCULATIONSVE SOUTH STACK
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period
Operator

Inputs For Calcs.
Sq. rt. delta P
Delta H
Stack temp. (deg.F)
Meter temp. (deg.F)
Sample volume (act.)
Barometric press. (in.Hg)
Volume H2O imp. (ml)Weight change sil. gel (g)
% CO2
% O2
% N2
Area of stack (sq.ft.)
Sample time (min.)Static pressure (in.H2O)
Nozzle dia. (in.)
Meter box cal.
Cp of pitot tube
Traverse points

1
VE South Stack
07/16/19
1605-1841
MW2
VE South Stack
07/17/19
0905-1058
MW3
VE South Stack
07/17/19
1250-1502
MW

0.75906
0.7854100.3
98.5
50.910
30.00
33.0
12.5
0.0
20.9
79.1
9.620
96.0
2.50
0.190
1.00080.84
240.75894
0.785497.4
87.9
49.525
30.07
31.0
14.1
0.0
20.9
79.1
9.620
96.0
2.50
0.190
1.00080.84
240.75569
0.7642100.4
99.0
50.263
30.07
29.0
12.9
0.0
20.9
79.1
9.620
96.0
2.50
0.190
1.0008
0.84
24

46

'

_.

~... A~~ISOKINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
clientw.o.#

Ghemou~s
15a~s:oo2.o~s

Project ID
A~afe/Source ID
Sainp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date IDc..~.....,n ..
~~~~~~.~~w~~~~
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator

EPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid

Stack Conditions
AssumedChemours%Moisture?
VE South - 3eRrbber`
Impinger Vol (ml)
STK
Silica gel (g)1CO2, °/a by Vol~'
M0010
02, % by Voli,~'jTemperature (°F)~^i ~15JUL2019
i ~Anfcr Tmm~ NCl
aic c~_...u.. oa_~.
•.•-•-• . -••~r ~ ~ ~.~..~w~, _~~.~.
sr -~~/ Static Press (in HZO)~- ` ' ~' mhlent Temp (°F)

Actual..

~~~ ~~Z )'L1~~~'
Pam _ or_

Meter Box ID~'
K Factor /~ 3Meter Box Y~ OMeter Box Del H
Initial
Mid-Point'7{~'r..T~~'~' ;Sample Train (k')
Probe ID /Length~
Probe Material~
BcWo~Leak Check @ (in Hg)~J
Pitot /Thermocouple ID
pC3; Pitot leak check good
~ ~o
/ rno
Pitot Coefficient
0.84
Pitot Inspection goodno(npNoale ID^~'~~rc ' ~ ~' _ ~ Method 3 System good
I no
1 no
rvozzie measurements ~-~cU(J
i emp ~necK
rre- i est Set
Avg NoaJe Dia (in)~/Meter Box Temp
`Z
Area of Stack (ft2)—~~
Reference Temp_
Sample Time
Pass/Fail (+/- p°)/FailTotal Traverse Pts
Temp Change Response i` / no

Final
.~,,
es no
6 (hp
/ tp

Nost-test Setvm~~~T~*7~~~7~3:I~+~iL'~F3r'~J~~t ~ • ~i''j.7~~II~~~. t ~~~- t ~J Avg Delta P

~~

.s~'7
Avg Sgrt Delta Pb,~s ob~Avelta HT

I Volume ~Jd ~~~`~ ~~. 0

vg Ts~~~DTm~

vg Sgrt Del H Comments:s,.S

M N axr~~ ire

i

ax

Mau

~~ l~/

lp~~ ~ ~ S~
47.~ 3 l~~o

EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846

(M~~

~
!
r—
/ FaU
/ no

i

ISOKINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
c~iient~.o.#project ID
Mode/Source ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/Location
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator ~chemaxs
15418':002.016
Chemours
VE South - S~rabber
STK
2
M0010
15JUL2019
VESa~th Stack"j~~`

EPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid

Stack Conditions
Assumed°/, Moisture
Impinger Vol (ml)
SIGca gel (g)CO2, °/a by Vol
02, % by Vol
Temperature (°F)
Meter Temp("F)
Static Press (fn H2O
L(;'~~
Ambient Temp (°F)

ACtU81~"pj.~—~

Meter Box ID
Meter Box Y
Meter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pitot /Thermocouple ID
Pitot Coefficient
Noale ID
NoaJe Measurements
Avg Noale Dia (in)Area of Stack (ftSample Tfine
Total Traverse Pts~"~ ~ ,~~~

48d~

K Factor

J

InitialSample Train (ft')

Born

Leak Check @ (in Hg)
Pitot leak check good
Pitot Inspection good
'Method 3 System good

0.84

~

~

~ Temp Check
7t

orb

Pa

~/

I,3 ~'
Mid-Point

~~~~~

Final
`.R.11~

~~
~r
~,~,
~~
}
~
r~~~~~~llti'7/~li:~~~~

re- eseos -Tes

Meter Box Temp
Reference Temp
Pass/Fail (+/- 2°~
Temp Change Response iZ!Febe / no

!Fell
/ no

e

ISOKINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
ClientW .O.#
Project ID.Mode/Bourne ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/Locatlon
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in gOperator

Cherrw~Ks
154 b.002,0'1fi
Chemours
VE South - 8l~b~r
STK
3
M0010
15JUL2019
VE SouUr S}acic

Assumed%Moisture
Impinger Vol (ml)Silica gel (g)CO2, % by Vol
02, % by Vol
Temperature (°F)!Meter Temp ("F)
Static Press (in HZO)

~

~
„~~

EPA Method 0010 - HF~O Diener Acid

StaC k Conditions~—

Area of Stack (ft2)
Sample Time
Total Traverse Pts

~~

-

K

Meter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pitot /Thermocouple ID
Pitot Coefficient
Noale ID
Noale Measurements
Avg NoaJe Dia (in)iU~'
r- (D tAmbient Temp (°F)

oActual-Pam ~ or.~

Meter eox ionneter eox r

Factor1~351
Initial
Mid-Point

,~
$'
8oro
q
0.84
) ~'~

Q

V

Leak Check @ Qn Hg)
Pitot leak check good
Pitot Inspection good
Metfwd 3 System good
Temp Check
Meter Box Temp
Reference Temp
Pass/Fall (+/- 2°~
Temp Change Response 5

,t,
1 no
/ no
I no
re-Test

/Fall
i no

~tL

52'

f~~
L

Avg Delta P
Avg Sgrt Dena P

Avg e

H

Avg S ~DQI ~Total Vol me Jv Ts

l~~l ~bol ray(/ l►~ I b

mments0 .~ try I ~EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846

49

Final

Sample Train (ft3)
~S
/ no
/ na
/ no

no
/ no
/ rp
Post- est Set

(FaH
/ no

~

SAMPLE RECOVERY FIELD DATAEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Dimer Acid
ClientLocation/Plant

W.O. #
Source &Location

Chemours
Fayetteville, NC

15418.002.016
VE South Stack

Run No.

1

Sample Date _~~f

Sample I.D.

Chemours - VE South -~artbber - STK - 1 - M0010 -Analyst~Ll~fll

Im in er
5

Recovery Date

~ lNl~'~

Filter Number

~1~

1

2

3

Contents

Empty

HPLC H2O

HPLC H2O

Silica GeI

Final

3~

~J~

°~ ~

~Cpt ~/`

Initial

~

100

100

~

300

Gain

~~

~

~~'

/L

y t~.~"

4

6

7

Imp.Total'~3

Impinger Color

Qr~~

Labeled?

Silica Gel Condition~

Sealed?

8

Total

~~

~

Run No.

2

Sample Date

Z ~%yRecovery Date~~~`~

Sample I.D.

Chemours - VE South - Zen7bben - STK - 2 - Moo10 -Analyst_~~(I~

Filter Number

Q~/4r

1
Empty

Contents

2
HPLC H2O

Impinger
53
HPLC H2O

4

(, ~~

~

~~r~,

~

soo

Final

' ~.-

Initial

6~

goo

goo

Gain

~ `7i

..~

~

6

7

Imp.Total~~

8
Silica Gel~~La.)

Impinger Color

Labeled?

Silica Gel Condition

Sealed?

Run No.

3

Sample Date __~~~'''~

Recovery Date

Sample I.D.

Chemours - VE South - ~aa~q~ - STK - 3 - Mo010 -AnalystFilter Number

1
Empty

2
HPLC H2O

3
HPLC H2O

4

Contents
Final

Z2

C.~Z

~

~p

Initial

.Q

goo

goo

d

Gain

~
2

~

"~

(p

Im finger
5

6

7

Imp.Total

8
Silica Gel

4`~' f

~~~-

Total

~`
soo
`Z~

Impinger Color
Silica Gel Condition

/~~'

Total

Labeled?
~~~Sealed?

Check COC for Sample IDs of Media Blanks

50

l

''~

METHODS AND ANALYZERSClient: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

File: C:\DATA\Chemours\July 2019\071619 VE South Run 1redo.cem
Program Version: 2.1, built 19 May 2017 File Version: 2.02
Computer: WSWCAIRSERVICES Trailer: 27
Analog Input Device: Keithley KUSB-3108
Channel 1
AnalyteMethodAnalyzer Make, Model & Serial No.
Full-Scale Output, mv
Analyzer Range, %Span Concentration, %O2
EPA 3A, Using Bias
Servomex 4900
10000
25.0
21.0

Channel 2
AnalyteMethodAnalyzer Make, Model & Serial No.
Full-Scale Output, mv
Analyzer Range, %Span Concentration, %CO2
EPA 3A, Using Bias
Servomex 4900
10000
20.0
17.1

51

CALIBRATION DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019
Start Time: 11:37
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards%
Cylinder ID
12.1
ALM053372
21.0
CC112489
Calibration Results
14 mv
Zero
8025 mv
Span, 21.0 %Curve Coefficients
Slope
Intercept
381.8
14
CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards%
Cylinder ID
9.0
ALM053372
17.1
CC112489
Calibration Results
-1 mv
Zero
8545 mv
Span, 17.1 %Curve Coefficients
Slope
Intercept
501.2
-1

52

CALIBRATION ERROR DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Start Time: 11:37
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Slope 381.8
Intercept 14.0

Standard
%
Zero
12.1
21.0

Result
%
0.0
12.0
21.0

Difference
%
0.0
-0.1
0.0

Error
%
0.0
-0.5
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 17.1 %Slope 501.2
Intercept -1.0
Standard
%
Zero
9.0
17.0

Result
%
0.0
9.0
17.0

Difference
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

53

Error
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass
Pass

BIAS
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Start Time: 11:45
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.4
0.4
12.1
0.1

Error
%
1.9
0.5

Status
Pass
Pass

Error
%
0.6
-1.8

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 17.1 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
9.0

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.1
0.1
8.7
-0.3

54

RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

15:51
15:52
15:53
15:54
15:55
15:56
15:57
15:58
15:59
16:00
16:01
16:02
16:03
16:04
16:05
16:06
16:07
16:08
16:09
16:10
16:11
16:12
16:13
16:14
16:15
16:16
16:17
16:18
16:19
16:20
16:21
16:22
16:23
16:24
16:25
16:26
16:27
16:28
16:29
16:30

20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2

55

RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

16:31
16:32
16:33
16:34
16:35
16:36
16:37
16:38
16:39
16:40
16:41
16:42
16:43
16:44
16:45
16:46
16:47
16:48
16:49
16:50
16:51
16:52
16:53
16:54
16:55
16:56
16:57
16:58
16:59
17:00
17:01
17:02
17:03
17:04
17:05
17:06
17:07
17:08
17:09
17:10

20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6

0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

56

RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

17:11
17:12
17:13
17:14
17:15
17:16
17:17
17:18
17:19
17:20
17:21
17:22
17:23
17:24
17:25
17:26
17:27
17:28
17:29
17:30
17:31
17:32
17:33
17:34
17:35
17:36
17:37
17:38
17:39
17:40
17:41
17:42
17:43
17:44
17:45
17:46
17:47
17:48
17:49
17:50

20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.7
20.7
20.6
20.6
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.6

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

57

RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

17:51
17:52
17:53
17:54
17:55
17:56
17:57
17:58
17:59
18:00
18:01
18:02
18:03
18:04
18:05
18:06
18:07
18:08
18:09
18:10
18:11
18:12
18:13
18:14
18:15
18:16
18:17
18:18
18:19
18:20
18:21
18:22
18:23
18:24
18:25
18:26
18:27
18:28
18:29
18:30

20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

58

RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

18:31
18:32
18:33
18:34
18:35
18:36
18:37
18:38
18:39
18:40
18:41
18:42
18:43
18:44
18:45
18:46
18:47
18:48
18:49
18:50
18:51
18:52
18:53
18:54
18:55
18:56
18:57
18:58
18:59
19:00
19:01
19:02
19:03
19:04
19:05
19:06
19:07
19:08
19:09
19:10

20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.6

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

59

RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

19:11
Avgs

20.6
20.6

0.1
0.1

60

RUN SUMMARY
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
MethodConc. Units

O2
EPA 3A%CO2
EPA 3A%

Time: 15:50 to 19:11
Run Averages
20.6

0.1

Pre-run Bias at 11:45
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.4
12.1
12.1

0.1
8.7
9.0

Post-run Bias at 19:14
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.3
12.0
12.1

0.1
8.8
9.0

Run averages corrected for the average of the pre-run and post-run bias
20.9

61

0.0

BIAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 16 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Start Time: 19:14
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0
Initial*%
0.4
12.1*Bias No. 1

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.3
0.3
12.0
0.0

Error
%
1.4
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.3
-0.1
12.0
-0.1

Drift
%
-0.5
-0.5

Status
Pass
Pass

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.1
0.1
8.8
-0.2

Error
%
0.6
-1.2

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.1
0.0
8.8
0.1

Drift
%
0.0
0.6

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 17.1 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
9.0
Initial*%
0.1
8.7*Bias No. 1

62

METHODS AND ANALYZERSClient: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

File: C:\DATA\Chemours\July 2019\071719 VE South Runs 2 and 3.cem
Program Version: 2.1, built 19 May 2017 File Version: 2.02
Computer: WSWCAIRSERVICES Trailer: 27
Analog Input Device: Keithley KUSB-3108
Channel 1
AnalyteMethodAnalyzer Make, Model & Serial No.
Full-Scale Output, mv
Analyzer Range, %Span Concentration, %O2
EPA 3A, Using Bias
Servomex 4900
10000
25.0
21.0

Channel 2
AnalyteMethodAnalyzer Make, Model & Serial No.
Full-Scale Output, mv
Analyzer Range, %Span Concentration, %CO2
EPA 3A, Using Bias
Servomex 4900
10000
20.0
17.1

63

CALIBRATION DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019
Start Time: 06:28
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards%
Cylinder ID
12.1
ALM053372
21.0
CC112489
Calibration Results
10 mv
Zero
7984 mv
Span, 21.0 %Curve Coefficients
Slope
Intercept
380.1
10
CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards%
Cylinder ID
9.0
ALM053372
17.1
CC112489
Calibration Results
-4 mv
Zero
8535 mv
Span, 17.1 %Curve Coefficients
Slope
Intercept
500.8
-4

64

CALIBRATION ERROR DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Start Time: 06:28
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Slope 380.1
Intercept 10.0

Standard
%
Zero
12.1
21.0

Result
%
0.0
12.0
21.0

Difference
%
0.0
-0.1
0.0

Error
%
0.0
-0.5
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 17.1 %Slope 500.8
Intercept -4.0
Standard
%
Zero
9.0
17.0

Result
%
0.0
9.0
17.0

Difference
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

65

Error
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass
Pass

BIAS
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Start Time: 06:37
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Error
%
0.0
-0.6

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 17.1 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
9.0

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.9
-0.1

66

RUN DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

09:05
09:06
09:07
09:08
09:09
09:10
09:11
09:12
09:13
09:14
09:15
09:16
09:17
09:18
09:19
09:20
09:21
09:22
09:23
09:24
09:25
09:26
09:27
09:28
09:29
09:30
09:31
09:32
09:33
09:34
09:35
09:36
09:37
09:38
09:39
09:40
09:41
09:42
09:43
09:44

20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8

0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

67

RUN DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

09:45
09:46
09:47
09:48
09:49
09:50
09:51
09:52
09:53
09:54
09:55
09:56
09:57
09:58
09:59
10:00
10:01
10:02
10:03
10:04
10:05
10:06
10:07
10:08
10:09
10:10
10:11
10:12
10:13
10:14
10:15
10:16
10:17
10:18
10:19
10:20
10:21
10:22
10:23
10:24

20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

68

RUN DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

10:25
10:26
10:27
10:28
10:29
10:30
10:31
10:32
10:33
10:34
10:35
10:36
10:37
10:38
10:39
10:40
10:41
10:42
10:43
10:44
10:45
10:46
10:47
10:48
10:49
10:50
10:51
10:52
10:53
10:54
10:55
10:56
10:57
10:58
10:59
11:00
11:01
11:02
11:03
11:04

20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

69

RUN DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

11:05
11:06
11:07
11:08
11:09
11:10
11:11
11:12
11:13
11:14
11:15
11:16
11:17
11:18
11:19
11:20
11:21
Avgs

20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1

70

RUN SUMMARY
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
MethodConc. Units

O2
EPA 3A%CO2
EPA 3A%

Time: 09:04 to 11:21
Run Averages
20.8

0.1

Pre-run Bias at 06:37
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.0
12.0
12.1

0.0
8.9
9.0

Post-run Bias at 11:22
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.1
11.9
12.1

0.1
8.8
9.0

Run averages corrected for the average of the pre-run and post-run bias
21.0

71

0.0

BIAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Start Time: 11:22
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0
Initial*%0.0
12.0*Bias No. 1

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.1
0.1
11.9
-0.1

Error
%
0.5
-0.5

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.1
0.1
11.9
-0.1

Drift
%
0.5
-0.5

Status
Pass
Pass

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.1
0.1
8.8
-0.2

Error
%
0.6
-1.2

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.1
0.1
8.8
-0.1

Drift
%
0.6
-0.6

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 17.1 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
9.0
Initial*%
0.0
8.9*Bias No. 1

72

RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

12:50
12:51
12:52
12:53
12:54
12:55
12:56
12:57
12:58
12:59
13:00
13:01
13:02
13:03
13:04
13:05
13:06
13:07
13:08
13:09
13:10
13:11
13:12
13:13
13:14
13:15
13:16
13:17
13:18
13:19
13:20
13:21
13:22
13:23
13:24
13:25
13:26
13:27
13:28
13:29

20.9
20.9
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

73

RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

13:30
13:31
13:32
13:33
13:34
13:35
13:36
13:37
13:38
13:39
13:40
13:41
13:42
13:43
13:44
13:45
13:46
13:47
13:48
13:49
13:50
13:51
13:52
13:53
13:54
13:55
13:56
13:57
13:58
13:59
14:00
14:01
14:02
14:03
14:04
14:05
14:06
14:07
14:08
14:09

20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.8
20.9
20.8
20.9
20.8
20.8
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.8
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.8
20.8

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

74

RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

14:10
14:11
14:12
14:13
14:14
14:15
14:16
14:17
14:18
14:19
14:20
14:21
14:22
14:23
14:24
14:25
14:26
14:27
14:28
14:29
14:30
14:31
14:32
14:33
14:34
14:35
14:36
14:37
14:38
14:39
14:40
14:41
14:42
14:43
14:44
14:45
14:46
14:47
14:48
14:49

20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

75

RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

14:50
14:51
14:52
14:53
14:54
14:55
14:56
14:57
14:58
14:59
15:00
15:01
15:02
15:03
15:04
15:05
15:06
15:07
15:08
15:09
15:10
15:11
15:12
15:13
15:14
15:15
15:16
15:17
15:18
15:19
15:20
15:21
15:22
15:23
15:24
15:25
15:26
15:27
15:28
15:29

20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

76

RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

15:30
15:31
15:32
15:33
15:34
15:35
15:36
Avgs

20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

77

RUN SUMMARY
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
MethodConc. Units

O2
EPA 3A%CO2
EPA 3A%

Time: 12:49 to 15:36
Run Averages
20.8

0.1

Pre-run Bias at 11:22
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.1
11.9
12.1

0.1
8.8
9.0

Post-run Bias at 15:38
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.1
12.0
12.1

0.0
8.8
9.0

Run averages corrected for the average of the pre-run and post-run bias
21.1

78

0.1

BIAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: FayettevilleSource: VE South

Project Number: 15418
Operator: SDR
Date: 17 Jul 2019

Calibration 1
Start Time: 15:38
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0
Initial*%
0.1
11.9*Bias No. 2

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.1
0.1
12.0
0.0

Error
%
0.5
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.1
0.0
12.0
0.1

Drift
%
0.0
0.5

Status
Pass
Pass

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.8
-0.2

Error
%
0.0
-1.2

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
-0.1
8.8
0.0

Drift
%
-0.6
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 17.1 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
9.0
Initial*%
0.1
8.8*Bias No. 2

79

APPENDIX CLABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD80

8/20/2019

ANALYTICAL REPORTJob Number: 140-16060-1
Job Description: VE South Carbon Bed Inlet - M0010
Contract Number: LBIO-67048
For:
Chemours Company FC, LLC The
c/o AECOM
Sabre Building, Suite 300
4051 Ogletown Road
Newark, DE 19713
Attention: Michael Aucoin_____________________________________________

Approved for release.
Courtney M Adkins
Project Manager I
7/29/2019 4:09 PM

Courtney M Adkins, Project Manager I
5815 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN, 37921(865)291-3000
courtney.adkins@testamericainc.com
07/29/2019

This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions pleasecontact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville5815 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN 37921
Tel (865) 291-3000 Fax (865) 584-4315 www.testamericainc.com

Page 81
1 of 208

07/29/2019

Table of Contents
Cover Title Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Data Summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
QC Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8

Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10Default Detection Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15

Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17

Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

21

Manual Integration Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Organic Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24

LCMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8321A_HFPO_Du . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

248321A_HFPO_Du QC Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

258321A_HFPO_Du Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29

Standards Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

418321A_HFPO_Du ICAL Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

418321A_HFPO_Du CCAL Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64

Raw QC Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

768321A_HFPO_Du Tune Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

768321A_HFPO_Du Blank Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

818321A_HFPO_Du LCS/LCSD Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

89Page 82
2 of 208

07/29/2019

Table of Contents
8321A_HFPO_Du Run Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

988321A_HFPO_Du Prep Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100

Method DV-LC-0012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

107

Method DV-LC-0012 QC Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

108

Method DV-LC-0012 Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

113

Standards Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

149

Method DV-LC-0012 CCAL Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

149

Raw QC Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

167

Method DV-LC-0012 Tune Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

167

Method DV-LC-0012 Blank Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

172

Method DV-LC-0012 LCS/LCSD Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

180

Method DV-LC-0012 Run Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

188

Method DV-LC-0012 Prep Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

190

Shipping and Receiving Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
Client Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page 83
3 of 208202

07/29/2019

Definitions/Glossary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Inlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16060-1

Glossary
Abbreviation
¤
%R
CFL
CNF
DER
Dil FacDL
DL, RA, RE, IN
DLC
EDL
LOD
LOQ
MDA
MDC
MDL
ML
NC
ND
PQL
QC
RER
RL
RPD
TEF
TEQ

These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Percent Recovery
Contains Free Liquid
Contains No Free Liquid
Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dilution Factor
Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
Method Detection Limit
Minimum Level (Dioxin)
Not Calculated
Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
Practical Quantitation Limit
Quality Control
Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)

Page 84
4 of 208

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Method Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Inlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16060-1

Method
8321A
8321A
None

Method Description
HFPO-DAPFOA and PFOS
Leaching Procedure

Protocol
SW846
SW846
TAL SOP

Laboratory
TAL DENTAL DENTAL DEN

None
None

Leaching Procedure for Condensate
Leaching Procedure for XAD

TAL SOPTAL SOPTAL DENTAL DEN

Protocol References:
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
TAL SOP = TestAmerica Laboratories, Standard Operating Procedure
Laboratory References:
TAL DEN = Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL (303)736-0100

Page 85
5 of 208

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Sample Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Inlet - M0010

Lab Sample ID
140-16060-1
140-16060-2
140-16060-3
140-16060-4
140-16060-5
140-16060-6
140-16060-7
140-16060-8
140-16060-9
140-16060-10
140-16060-11
140-16060-12

Job ID: 140-16060-1

Client Sample ID
MatrixAir
G-2347,2348 VES CARBON BED INLET R1
M0010 FH
G-2349,2350,2352 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 Air
M0010 BH
G-2351 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010 IMPAir
1,2&3 CONDENSATEAir
G-2353 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Air
G-2354,2355 VES CARBON BED INLET R2
M0010 FH
G-2356,2357,2359 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 Air
M0010 BH
G-2358 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010 IMPAir
1,2&3 CONDENSATEAir
G-2360 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Air
G-2361,2362 VES CARBON BED INLET R3
M0010 FH
G-2363,2364,2366 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 Air
M0010 BH
G-2365 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010 IMPAir
1,2&3 CONDENSATEAir
G-2367 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE

Page 86
6 of 208

Collected
Received
Asset ID
07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Job Narrative
140-16060-1
Sample Receipt
The samples were received on July 17, 2019 at 8:00 PM in good condition and properly preserved. The temperature of the cooler atreceipt was 0.4º C.
Quality Control and Data Interpretation
Unless otherwise noted, all holding times, and QC criteria were met and the test results shown in this report meet all applicable NELAC
requirements.
Method 0010/Method 3542 Sampling Train Preparation
Train fractions were extracted and prepared for analysis in TestAmerica’s Knoxville laboratory. Extracts and condensate samples were
forwarded to the Denver laboratory for HFPO-DA analysis. All results are reported in “Total ug” per sample.
LCMS
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Organic Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Comments
Reporting Limits (RLs) and Method Detection Limits (MDLs) for the HFPO-DA used in this report were derived in Denver for reporting
soils and water samples. Method 0010 sampling train matrix specific RLs and MDLs have not been established for HFPO-DA. The soil
and water limits are expected to be reasonable approximations of the actual matrix specific limits, under these conditions.
Breakthrough from the Modified Method 0010 Sampling Train for PFAS compounds will be measured by the percentage (%)
concentration of a specific PFAS target analyte determined to be present in the Breakthrough XAD-2 resin module of a test run. If theconcentration of a specific PFAS compound is ≤30% of the sum of the concentrations determined for the other three (3) fractions of thesampling train, then sampling breakthrough is determined not to have occurred. Also, no breakthrough will be determined to haveoccurred if < 250 µg of a target analyte is collected on all fractions of a sampling train. Breakthrough the sampling train implies thatsample loss through the train has occurred and results in a negative bias to the sample results.

Page 87
7 of 208

07/29/2019

QC Association Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Inlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16060-1

LCMS
Analysis Batch: 464589
Lab Sample ID
DLCK 280-464589/13

Client Sample ID
Lab Control Sample

Prep Type
Total/NA

MatrixAir

Method8321APrep Batch

Lab Sample ID
140-16060-3
140-16060-7
140-16060-11

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
MatrixG-2351 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010 IMPTotal/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATEAir
G-2358 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010 IMPTotal/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATEAir
G-2365 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010 IMPTotal/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATEAir

Method
None
None
None

Prep Batch

MB 280-465107/1-A
LCS 280-465107/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

None
None

Prep Batch: 465107

Total/NA
Total/NA

Air
Air

Prep Batch: 465193
Lab Sample ID
140-16060-2
140-16060-4
140-16060-6

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
MatrixG-2349,2350,2352 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010
Total/NA
BH
Air
G-2353 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2AirRESIN TUBE
G-2356,2357,2359 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010
Total/NA
BH
Air

Method
None
None
None

140-16060-8
140-16060-10
140-16060-12

G-2360 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2AirRESIN TUBE
G-2363,2364,2366 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010
Total/NA
BH
Air
G-2367 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2AirRESIN TUBE

None
None
None

MB 280-465193/1-A
LCS 280-465193/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Air
Air

None
None

Total/NA
Total/NA

Prep Batch

Prep Batch: 465251
Lab Sample ID
140-16060-1
140-16060-5
140-16060-9

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
G-2347,2348 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010
Total/NA
FH
G-2354,2355 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010
Total/NA
FH
G-2361,2362 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010
Total/NA
FH

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
None
None
None

MB 280-465251/1-A
LCS 280-465251/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Air
Air

None
None

Total/NA
Total/NA

Prep Batch

Analysis Batch: 465647
Lab Sample ID
140-16060-3
140-16060-7
140-16060-11

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
MatrixG-2351 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010 IMPTotal/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATEAir
G-2358 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010 IMPTotal/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATEAir
G-2365 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010 IMPTotal/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATEAir

Method
8321A
8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465107465107465107

MB 280-465107/1-A
LCS 280-465107/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Air
Air

8321A
8321A

465107465107

Total/NA
Total/NA

Analysis Batch: 465648
Lab Sample ID
140-16060-1
140-16060-5
140-16060-9

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
G-2347,2348 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010
Total/NA
FH
G-2354,2355 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010
Total/NA
FH
G-2361,2362 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010
Total/NA
FH

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
8321A
8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465251465251465251

MB 280-465251/1-A
LCS 280-465251/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Air
Air

8321A
8321A

465251465251

Total/NA
Total/NA

Analysis Batch: 465777
Lab Sample ID
140-16060-2
140-16060-4
140-16060-6

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
MatrixG-2349,2350,2352 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010
Total/NA
BH
Air
G-2353 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2AirRESIN TUBE
G-2356,2357,2359 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010
Total/NA
BH
Air

Method
8321A
8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465193465193465193140-16060-8

G-2360 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2AirRESIN TUBE

8321A

465193

Page 88
8 of 208

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

QC Association Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Inlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16060-1

LCMS (Continued)
Analysis Batch: 465777 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID
140-16060-10
140-16060-12

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
MatrixG-2363,2364,2366 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010
Total/NA
BH
Air
G-2367 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2AirRESIN TUBE

Method8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465193465193

MB 280-465193/1-A
LCS 280-465193/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

8321A
8321A

465193465193

Total/NA
Total/NA

Page 89
9 of 208

Air
Air

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Inlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16060-1

Client Sample ID: G-2347,2348 VES CARBON BED INLET R1
M0010 FHLab Sample ID: 140-16060-1

Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

1.39%Recovery Qualifier
92

RL
0.126

MDL Unit
0.0136 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: G-2349,2350,2352 VES CARBON BED INLET
R1 M0010 BH

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:09

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:09

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16060-2

Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

36.3%Recovery Qualifier
76

RL
0.275

MDL Unit
0.0550 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: G-2351 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010
IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:48

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:48

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16060-3

Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

9.68%Recovery Qualifier
80

RL
0.230

MDL Unit
0.0117 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: G-2353 VES CARBON BED INLET R1 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:20

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:20

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16060-4

Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
84

Limits50 - 200

90of 208
Page 10

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:51

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:51

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Inlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16060-1

Client Sample ID: G-2354,2355 VES CARBON BED INLET R2
M0010 FHLab Sample ID: 140-16060-5

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

2.14%Recovery Qualifier
90

RL
0.151

MDL Unit
0.0163 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: G-2356,2357,2359 VES CARBON BED INLET
R2 M0010 BH

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:13

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:13

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16060-6

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

7.65%Recovery Qualifier
82

RL
0.275

MDL Unit
0.0550 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: G-2358 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010
IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:54

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:54

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16060-7

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.205

%Recovery Qualifier
83

Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0105 ug/Sample

Client Sample ID: G-2360 VES CARBON BED INLET R2 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:24

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:24

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16060-8

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
60

Limits50 - 200

91of 208
Page 11

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:58

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:58

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Inlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16060-1

Client Sample ID: G-2361,2362 VES CARBON BED INLET R3
M0010 FHLab Sample ID: 140-16060-9

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

1.95%Recovery Qualifier
90

RL
0.126

MDL Unit
0.0136 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: G-2363,2364,2366 VES CARBON BED INLET
R3 M0010 BH

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:16

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:16

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16060-10

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

1.82%Recovery Qualifier
100

RL
0.300

MDL Unit
0.0600 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: G-2365 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010
IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 14:01

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 14:01

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16060-11

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.480

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA%Recovery Qualifier
82

RL
0.250

MDL Unit
0.0128 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: G-2367 VES CARBON BED INLET R3 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:27

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:27

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16060-12

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
63

Limits50 - 200

92of 208
Page 12

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 14:04

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 14:04

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

ANALYTICAL REPORTJob Number: 140-16059-1
Job Description: VE South Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010
Contract Number: LBIO-67048
For:
Chemours Company FC, LLC The
c/o AECOM
Sabre Building, Suite 300
4051 Ogletown Road
Newark, DE 19713
Attention: Michael Aucoin_____________________________________________

Approved for release.
Courtney M Adkins
Project Manager I
7/29/2019 4:06 PM

Courtney M Adkins, Project Manager I
5815 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN, 37921(865)291-3000
courtney.adkins@testamericainc.com
07/29/2019

This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions pleasecontact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville5815 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN 37921
Tel (865) 291-3000 Fax (865) 584-4315 www.testamericainc.com

Page 93
1 of 201

07/29/2019

Table of Contents
Cover Title Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Data Summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
QC Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8

Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10Default Detection Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15

Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17

Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

21

Manual Integration Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Organic Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24

LCMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8321A_HFPO_Du . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

248321A_HFPO_Du QC Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

258321A_HFPO_Du Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

28

Standards Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

408321A_HFPO_Du ICAL Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

408321A_HFPO_Du CCAL Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63

Raw QC Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

72

8321A_HFPO_Du Blank Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

72

8321A_HFPO_Du LCS/LCSD Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

768321A_HFPO_Du Run Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

80Page 94
2 of 201

07/29/2019

Table of Contents
8321A_HFPO_Du Prep Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82

Method DV-LC-0012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

87

Method DV-LC-0012 QC Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

88Method DV-LC-0012 Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

95

Standards Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

131

Method DV-LC-0012 CCAL Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

131

Raw QC Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

149

Method DV-LC-0012 Tune Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

149

Method DV-LC-0012 Blank Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

154

Method DV-LC-0012 LCS/LCSD Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

166

Method DV-LC-0012 Run Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

179

Method DV-LC-0012 Prep Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

182

Shipping and Receiving Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
Client Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page 95
3 of 201

195

07/29/2019

Definitions/Glossary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16059-1

Qualifiers
LCMS
QualifierJ

Qualifier Description
Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.

Glossary
Abbreviation
¤
%R
CFL
CNF
DER
Dil FacDL
DL, RA, RE, IN
DLC
EDL
LOD
LOQ
MDA
MDC
MDL
ML
NC
ND
PQL
QC
RER
RL
RPD
TEF
TEQ

These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Percent Recovery
Contains Free Liquid
Contains No Free Liquid
Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dilution Factor
Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
Method Detection Limit
Minimum Level (Dioxin)
Not Calculated
Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
Practical Quantitation Limit
Quality Control
Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)

Page 96
4 of 201

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Method Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16059-1

Method
8321A
8321A
None

Method Description
HFPO-DAPFOA and PFOS
Leaching Procedure

Protocol
SW846
SW846
TAL SOP

Laboratory
TAL DENTAL DENTAL DEN

None
None

Leaching Procedure for Condensate
Leaching Procedure for XAD

TAL SOPTAL SOPTAL DENTAL DEN

Protocol References:
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
TAL SOP = TestAmerica Laboratories, Standard Operating Procedure
Laboratory References:
TAL DEN = Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL (303)736-0100

Page 97
5 of 201

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Sample Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010

Lab Sample ID
140-16059-1
140-16059-2
140-16059-3
140-16059-4
140-16059-5
140-16059-6
140-16059-7
140-16059-8
140-16059-9
140-16059-10
140-16059-11
140-16059-12

Client Sample ID
A-5947,5948 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1
M0010 FH
A-5949,5950,5952 VES CARBON BED OUTLET
R1 M0010 BH
A-5951 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1 M0010
IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
A-5953 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
A-5954,5955 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2
M0010 FH
A-5956,5957,5959 VES CARBON BED OUTLET
R2 M0010 BH
A-5958 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2 M0010
IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
A-5960 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
A-5961,5962 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3
M0010 FH
A-5963,5964,5966 VES CARBON BED OUTLET
R3 M0010 BH
A-5965 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3 M0010
IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
A-5967 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE

Job ID: 140-16059-1

MatrixAir

Collected
Received
Asset ID
07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Page 98
6 of 201

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Job Narrative
140-16059-1
Sample Receipt
The samples were received on July 17, 2019 at 8:00 PM in good condition and properly preserved. The temperature of the cooler atreceipt was 0.2º C.
Quality Control and Data Interpretation
Unless otherwise noted, all holding times, and QC criteria were met and the test results shown in this report meet all applicable NELAC
requirements.
Method 0010/Method 3542 Sampling Train Preparation
Train fractions were extracted and prepared for analysis in TestAmerica’s Knoxville laboratory. Extracts and condensate samples were
forwarded to the Denver laboratory for HFPO-DA analysis. All results are reported in “Total ug” per sample.
LCMS
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Organic Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Comments
Reporting Limits (RLs) and Method Detection Limits (MDLs) for the HFPO-DA used in this report were derived in Denver for reporting
soils and water samples. Method 0010 sampling train matrix specific RLs and MDLs have not been established for HFPO-DA. The soil
and water limits are expected to be reasonable approximations of the actual matrix specific limits, under these conditions.
Breakthrough from the Modified Method 0010 Sampling Train for PFAS compounds will be measured by the percentage (%)
concentration of a specific PFAS target analyte determined to be present in the Breakthrough XAD-2 resin module of a test run. If theconcentration of a specific PFAS compound is ≤30% of the sum of the concentrations determined for the other three (3) fractions of thesampling train, then sampling breakthrough is determined not to have occurred. Also, no breakthrough will be determined to haveoccurred if < 250 µg of a target analyte is collected on all fractions of a sampling train. Breakthrough the sampling train implies thatsample loss through the train has occurred and results in a negative bias to the sample results.

Page 99
7 of 201

07/29/2019

QC Association Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16059-1

LCMS
Analysis Batch: 464589
Lab Sample ID
DLCK 280-464589/13

Client Sample ID
Lab Control Sample

Prep Type
Total/NA

MatrixAir

Method8321APrep Batch

Prep Batch

Prep Batch: 465059
Lab Sample ID
140-16059-2
140-16059-4
140-16059-6

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
MatrixA-5949,5950,5952 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1
Total/NA
M0010 BH
Air
A-5953 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2
Air RESIN TUBE
A-5956,5957,5959 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2
Total/NA
M0010 BH
Air

Method
None
None
None

140-16059-8
140-16059-10
140-16059-12

A-5960 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2
Air RESIN TUBE
A-5963,5964,5966 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3
Total/NA
M0010 BH
Air
A-5967 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2
Air RESIN TUBE

None
None
None

MB 280-465059/13-A
MB 280-465059/1-A
LCS 280-465059/2-A

Method Blank
Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

None
None
None

Total/NA
Total/NA
Total/NA

Air
Air
Air

Prep Batch: 465107
Lab Sample ID
140-16059-3

MethodNone

140-16059-7
140-16059-11

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Air
A-5951 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1 M0010 IMP
Total/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATE
A-5958 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2 M0010 IMP
Total/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Air
A-5965 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3 M0010 IMP
Total/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATEAir

MB 280-465107/1-A
LCS 280-465107/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Air
Air

None
None

Total/NA
Total/NA

Prep Batch

None
None

Prep Batch: 465251
Lab Sample ID
140-16059-1
140-16059-5
140-16059-9

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
A-5947,5948 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1 M0010
Total/NA
FH
A-5954,5955 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2 M0010
Total/NA
FH
A-5961,5962 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3 M0010
Total/NA
FH

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
None
None
None

MB 280-465251/1-A
LCS 280-465251/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Air
Air

None
None

Total/NA
Total/NA

Prep Batch

Analysis Batch: 465646
Lab Sample ID
140-16059-2
140-16059-4
140-16059-6

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
MatrixA-5949,5950,5952 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1
Total/NA
M0010 BH
Air
A-5953 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2
Air RESIN TUBE
A-5956,5957,5959 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2
Total/NA
M0010 BH
Air

Method
8321A
8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465059465059465059140-16059-8
140-16059-10
140-16059-12

A-5960 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2
Air RESIN TUBE
A-5963,5964,5966 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3
Total/NA
M0010 BH
Air
A-5967 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
Total/NA
XAD-2
Air RESIN TUBE

8321A
8321A
8321A

465059465059465059MB 280-465059/13-A
MB 280-465059/1-A
LCS 280-465059/2-A

Method Blank
Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

8321A
8321A
8321A

465059465059465059Total/NA
Total/NA
Total/NA

Air
Air
Air

Analysis Batch: 465647
Lab Sample ID
140-16059-3
140-16059-7
140-16059-11

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
MatrixA-5951 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1 M0010 IMP
Total/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Air
A-5958 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2 M0010 IMP
Total/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Air
A-5965 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3 M0010 IMP
Total/NA
1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Air

Method
8321A
8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465107465107465107

MB 280-465107/1-A
LCS 280-465107/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

8321A
8321A

465107465107

Total/NA
Total/NA

Page100
8 of 201

Air
Air

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

QC Association Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16059-1

LCMS
Analysis Batch: 465648
Lab Sample ID
140-16059-1
140-16059-5
140-16059-9

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
A-5947,5948 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1 M0010
Total/NA
FH
A-5954,5955 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2 M0010
Total/NA
FH
A-5961,5962 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3 M0010
Total/NA
FH

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
8321A
8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465251465251465251

MB 280-465251/1-A
LCS 280-465251/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Air
Air

8321A
8321A

465251465251

Total/NA
Total/NA

Page101
9 of 201

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16059-1

Client Sample ID: A-5947,5948 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1
M0010 FHLab Sample ID: 140-16059-1

Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

1.07%Recovery Qualifier
92

RL
0.102

MDL Unit
0.0110 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:00

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:00

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16059-2

Client Sample ID: A-5949,5950,5952 VES CARBON BED
OUTLET R1 M0010 BH
Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

4.91%Recovery Qualifier
76

RL
0.300

MDL Unit
0.0600 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: A-5951 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1
M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:18

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:18

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16059-3

Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

2.01%Recovery Qualifier
79

RL
0.222

MDL Unit
0.0113 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: A-5953 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R1
M0010 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:11

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:11

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16059-4

Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
75

Limits50 - 200

Page 102
10 of 201

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:25

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:25

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16059-1

Client Sample ID: A-5954,5955 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2
M0010 FHLab Sample ID: 140-16059-5

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

1.04%Recovery Qualifier
85

RL
0.126

MDL Unit
0.0136 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:03

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:03

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16059-6

Client Sample ID: A-5956,5957,5959 VES CARBON BED
OUTLET R2 M0010 BH
Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.983

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA%Recovery Qualifier
79

RL
0.275

MDL Unit
0.0550 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: A-5958 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2
M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:28

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:28

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16059-7

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.281

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA%Recovery Qualifier
81

RL
0.210

MDL Unit
0.0107 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: A-5960 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R2
M0010 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:14

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:14

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16059-8

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
82

Limits50 - 200

Page 103
11 of 201

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:31

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:31

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010

Job ID: 140-16059-1

Client Sample ID: A-5961,5962 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3
M0010 FHLab Sample ID: 140-16059-9

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

1.10%Recovery Qualifier
86

RL
0.126

MDL Unit
0.0136 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:06

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 14:06

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16059-10

Client Sample ID: A-5963,5964,5966 VES CARBON BED
OUTLET R3 M0010 BH
Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

1.34%Recovery Qualifier
82

RL
0.275

MDL Unit
0.0550 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: A-5965 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3
M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:35

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:35

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16059-11

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.206 J

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA%Recovery Qualifier
80

RL
0.230

MDL Unit
0.0117 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: A-5967 VES CARBON BED OUTLET R3
M0010 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:17

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 13:17

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16059-12

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
78

Limits50 - 200

Page 104
12 of 201

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:38

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 12:38

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

ANALYTICAL REPORTJob Number: 140-16057-1
Job Description: VE South Stack - M0010
Contract Number: LBIO-67048
For:
Chemours Company FC, LLC The
c/o AECOM
Sabre Building, Suite 300
4051 Ogletown Road
Newark, DE 19713
Attention: Michael Aucoin_____________________________________________

Approved for release.
Courtney M Adkins
Project Manager I
7/29/2019 4:01 PM

Courtney M Adkins, Project Manager I
5815 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN, 37921(865)291-3000
courtney.adkins@testamericainc.com
07/29/2019

This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions pleasecontact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville5815 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN 37921
Tel (865) 291-3000 Fax (865) 584-4315 www.testamericainc.com

Page105
1 of 225

07/29/2019

Table of Contents
Cover Title Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Data Summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
QC Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8

Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10Default Detection Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15

Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17

Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22

Manual Integration Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

Organic Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27

LCMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
8321A_HFPO_Du . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

278321A_HFPO_Du QC Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

288321A_HFPO_Du Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

31Standards Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

458321A_HFPO_Du ICAL Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

458321A_HFPO_Du CCAL Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

68

Raw QC Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

74

8321A_HFPO_Du Tune Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

74

8321A_HFPO_Du Blank Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

798321A_HFPO_Du LCS/LCSD Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

83

Page106
2 of 225

07/29/2019

Table of Contents
8321A_HFPO_Du Run Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

878321A_HFPO_Du Prep Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

89

Method DV-LC-0012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

96

Method DV-LC-0012 QC Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

97

Method DV-LC-0012 Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

105Standards Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142

Method DV-LC-0012 CCAL Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142

Raw QC Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

163

Method DV-LC-0012 Tune Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

163

Method DV-LC-0012 Blank Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

168

Method DV-LC-0012 LCS/LCSD Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

184

Method DV-LC-0012 Run Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

201

Method DV-LC-0012 Prep Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

205

Shipping and Receiving Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
Client Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page107
3 of 225219

07/29/2019

Definitions/Glossary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Stack - M0010

Job ID: 140-16057-1

Qualifiers
LCMS
QualifierJ

Qualifier Description
Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.

Glossary
Abbreviation
¤
%R
CFL
CNF
DER
Dil FacDL
DL, RA, RE, IN
DLC
EDL
LOD
LOQ
MDA
MDC
MDL
ML
NC
ND
PQL
QC
RER
RL
RPD
TEF
TEQ

These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Percent Recovery
Contains Free Liquid
Contains No Free Liquid
Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dilution Factor
Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
Method Detection Limit
Minimum Level (Dioxin)
Not Calculated
Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
Practical Quantitation Limit
Quality Control
Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)

Page108
4 of 225

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Method Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Stack - M0010

Job ID: 140-16057-1

Method
8321A
8321A
None

Method Description
HFPO-DAPFOA and PFOS
Leaching Procedure

Protocol
SW846
SW846
TAL SOP

Laboratory
TAL DENTAL DENTAL DEN

None
None

Leaching Procedure for Condensate
Leaching Procedure for XAD

TAL SOPTAL SOPTAL DENTAL DEN

Protocol References:
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
TAL SOP = TestAmerica Laboratories, Standard Operating Procedure
Laboratory References:
TAL DEN = Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL (303)736-0100

Page109
5 of 225

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Sample Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Stack - M0010

Lab Sample ID
140-16057-1
140-16057-2
140-16057-3
140-16057-4
140-16057-5
140-16057-6
140-16057-7
140-16057-8
140-16057-9
140-16057-10
140-16057-11
140-16057-12

Client Sample ID
R-2305,2306 VES STK R1 M0010 FH
R-2307,2308,2310 VES STK R1 M0010 BH
R-2309 VES STK R1 M0010 IMP 1,2&3
CONDENSATE
R-2311 VES STK R1 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
R-2312,2313 VES STK R2 M0010 FH
R-2314,2315,2317 VES STK R2 M0010 BH
R-2316 VES STK R2 M0010 IMP 1,2&3
CONDENSATE
R-2318 VES STK R2 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
R-2319,2320 VES STK R3 M0010 FH
R-2321,2322,2324 VES STK R3 M0010 BH
R-2323 VES STK R3 M0010 IMP 1,2&3
CONDENSATE
R-2325 VES STK R3 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH
XAD-2 RESIN TUBE

Job ID: 140-16057-1

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Collected
Received
Asset ID
07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/16/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air
Air
Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air
Air
Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00
07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Air

07/17/19 00:00 07/17/19 20:00

Page110
6 of 225

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Job Narrative
140-16057-1
Sample Receipt
The samples were received on July 17, 2019 at 8:00 PM in good condition and properly preserved. The temperatures of the 2 coolers atreceipt time were 0.3º C and 0.7º C.
Quality Control and Data Interpretation
Unless otherwise noted, all holding times, and QC criteria were met and the test results shown in this report meet all applicable NELAC
requirements.
Method 0010/Method 3542 Sampling Train Preparation
Train fractions were extracted and prepared for analysis in TestAmerica’s Knoxville laboratory. Extracts and condensate samples were
forwarded to the Denver laboratory for HFPO-DA analysis. All results are reported in “Total ug” per sample.
LCMS
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Organic Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Comments
Reporting Limits (RLs) and Method Detection Limits (MDLs) for the HFPO-DA used in this report were derived in Denver for reporting
soils and water samples. Method 0010 sampling train matrix specific RLs and MDLs have not been established for HFPO-DA. The soil
and water limits are expected to be reasonable approximations of the actual matrix specific limits, under these conditions.
Breakthrough from the Modified Method 0010 Sampling Train for PFAS compounds will be measured by the percentage (%)
concentration of a specific PFAS target analyte determined to be present in the Breakthrough XAD-2 resin module of a test run. If theconcentration of a specific PFAS compound is ≤30% of the sum of the concentrations determined for the other three (3) fractions of thesampling train, then sampling breakthrough is determined not to have occurred. Also, no breakthrough will be determined to haveoccurred if < 250 µg of a target analyte is collected on all fractions of a sampling train. Breakthrough the sampling train implies thatsample loss through the train has occurred and results in a negative bias to the sample results.

Page111
7 of 225

07/29/2019

QC Association Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Stack - M0010

Job ID: 140-16057-1

LCMS
Analysis Batch: 464589
Lab Sample ID
DLCK 280-464589/13

Client Sample ID
Lab Control Sample

Prep Type
Total/NA

MatrixAir

Method8321APrep Batch

Prep Batch

Prep Batch: 465059
Lab Sample ID
140-16057-2
140-16057-4
140-16057-6

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
R-2307,2308,2310 VES STK R1 M0010 BH
Total/NA
R-2311 VES STK R1 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2
Total/NARESIN TUBE
R-2314,2315,2317 VES STK R2 M0010 BH
Total/NA

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
None
None
None

140-16057-8
MB 280-465059/1-A
LCS 280-465059/2-A

R-2318 VES STK R2 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2
Total/NARESIN TUBE
Method Blank
Total/NALab Control Sample
Total/NA

Air
Air
Air

None
None
None

MatrixAir

MethodNone

140-16057-7
140-16057-11

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
R-2309 VES STK R1 M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Total/NA
R-2316 VES STK R2 M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Total/NA
R-2323 VES STK R3 M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Total/NA

Air
Air

None
None

MB 280-465107/1-A
LCS 280-465107/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Air
Air

None
None

Prep Batch: 465107
Lab Sample ID
140-16057-3

Total/NA
Total/NA

Prep Batch

Prep Batch: 465193
Lab Sample ID
140-16057-10
140-16057-12
MB 280-465193/1-A

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
R-2321,2322,2324 VES STK R3 M0010 BH
Total/NA
R-2325 VES STK R3 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2
Total/NARESIN TUBE
Method Blank
Total/NA

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
None
None
None

LCS 280-465193/2-A

Lab Control Sample

Total/NA

Air

None

Lab Sample ID
140-16057-1
140-16057-5
140-16057-9

Client Sample ID
R-2305,2306 VES STK R1 M0010 FH
R-2312,2313 VES STK R2 M0010 FH
R-2319,2320 VES STK R3 M0010 FH

Prep Type
Total/NA
Total/NA
Total/NA

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
None
None
None

MB 280-465251/1-A
LCS 280-465251/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Total/NA
Total/NA

Air
Air

None
None

Prep Batch

Prep Batch: 465251
Prep Batch

Analysis Batch: 465646
Lab Sample ID
140-16057-2
140-16057-4
140-16057-6

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
R-2307,2308,2310 VES STK R1 M0010 BH
Total/NA
R-2311 VES STK R1 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2
Total/NARESIN TUBE
R-2314,2315,2317 VES STK R2 M0010 BH
Total/NA

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
8321A
8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465059465059465059140-16057-8
MB 280-465059/1-A
LCS 280-465059/2-A

R-2318 VES STK R2 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2
Total/NARESIN TUBE
Method Blank
Total/NALab Control Sample
Total/NA

Air
Air
Air

8321A
8321A
8321A

465059465059465059Lab Sample ID
140-16057-3
140-16057-7
140-16057-11

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
R-2309 VES STK R1 M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Total/NA
R-2316 VES STK R2 M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Total/NA
R-2323 VES STK R3 M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Total/NA

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
8321A
8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465107465107465107

MB 280-465107/1-A
LCS 280-465107/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Air
Air

8321A
8321A

465107465107

Analysis Batch: 465647

Total/NA
Total/NA

Page1128 of 225

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

QC Association Summary
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Stack - M0010

Job ID: 140-16057-1

LCMS
Analysis Batch: 465648
Lab Sample ID
140-16057-1
140-16057-5
140-16057-9

Client Sample ID
R-2305,2306 VES STK R1 M0010 FH
R-2312,2313 VES STK R2 M0010 FH
R-2319,2320 VES STK R3 M0010 FH

Prep Type
Total/NA
Total/NA
Total/NA

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
8321A
8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465251465251465251

MB 280-465251/1-A
LCS 280-465251/2-A

Method Blank
Lab Control Sample

Total/NA
Total/NA

Air
Air

8321A
8321A

465251465251Analysis Batch: 465777
Lab Sample ID
140-16057-10
140-16057-12
MB 280-465193/1-A

Client Sample ID
Prep Type
R-2321,2322,2324 VES STK R3 M0010 BH
Total/NA
R-2325 VES STK R3 M0010 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2
Total/NARESIN TUBE
Method Blank
Total/NA

MatrixAir
Air
Air

Method
8321A
8321A
8321A

Prep Batch
465193465193465193

LCS 280-465193/2-A

Lab Control Sample

Air

8321A

465193

Total/NA

Page113
9 of 225

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Stack - M0010

Job ID: 140-16057-1

Client Sample ID: R-2305,2306 VES STK R1 M0010 FH

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-1

Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.102

1.62
%Recovery Qualifier
94

MDL Unit
0.0110 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: R-2307,2308,2310 VES STK R1 M0010 BH

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 13:43

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 13:43

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-2

Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.200

1.91
%Recovery Qualifier
67

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 11:49

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 11:49

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-3

Client Sample ID: R-2309 VES STK R1 M0010 IMP 1,2&3
CONDENSATE
Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.278

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.230

%Recovery Qualifier82

MDL Unit
0.0117 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 12:51

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 12:51

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-4

Client Sample ID: R-2311 VES STK R1 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 07/16/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
77

Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

Client Sample ID: R-2312,2313 VES STK R2 M0010 FH

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 11:52

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 11:52

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-5

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.980

RL
0.126

Page 114
10 of 225

MDL Unit
0.0136 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 13:46

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Stack - M0010

Job ID: 140-16057-1

Client Sample ID: R-2312,2313 VES STK R2 M0010 FH

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-5

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Matrix: Air%Recovery Qualifier
88

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 13:46

Client Sample ID: R-2314,2315,2317 VES STK R2 M0010 BH

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-6

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.200

1.54
%Recovery Qualifier
70

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 11:56

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 11:56

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-7

Client Sample ID: R-2316 VES STK R2 M0010 IMP 1,2&3
CONDENSATE
Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.175 J

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.216

%Recovery Qualifier
90

MDL Unit
0.0110 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 12:54

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 12:54

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-8

Client Sample ID: R-2318 VES STK R2 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
76

Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

Client Sample ID: R-2319,2320 VES STK R3 M0010 FH

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 11:59

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/19/19 14:50 07/25/19 11:59

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-9

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier

1.28%Recovery Qualifier
92

RL
0.101
Limits50 - 200

Page 115
11 of 225

MDL Unit
0.0109 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 13:50

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 16:15 07/25/19 13:50

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: VE South Stack - M0010

Job ID: 140-16057-1

Client Sample ID: R-2321,2322,2324 VES STK R3 M0010 BH

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-10

Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.464

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.225

%Recovery Qualifier
88

MDL Unit
0.0450 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:38

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:38

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-11

Client Sample ID: R-2323 VES STK R3 M0010 IMP 1,2&3
CONDENSATE
Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.212 J

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.224

%Recovery Qualifier
85

MDL Unit
0.0114 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 12:57

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/23/19 09:00 07/25/19 12:57

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-16057-12

Client Sample ID: R-2325 VES STK R3 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 07/17/19 00:00
Date Received: 07/17/19 20:00
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
63

Limits50 - 200

Page 116
12 of 225

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:41

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
07/22/19 12:45 07/26/19 13:41

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville
07/29/2019

APPENDIX DSAMPLE CALCULATIONSIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

117

8/20/2019

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORHFPO DIMER ACID (METHOD 0010)

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 1
Test Location: VES CBed Inlet

Plant: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 07/16/19
Test Period: 1605-1841

1. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

Conc1

=

W x 2.2046 x 10-9-----------------------------Vm(std)

Conc1

=

47.4 x 2.2046 x 10-9-----------------------------48.469

Conc1

=

2.15E-09

Where:W=

Weight of HFPO Dimer Acid collected in sample in ug.

Conc1

=

HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

2.2046x10-9 =Conversion factor from ug to lbs.

2. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.

Conc2

=

W / ( Vm(std) x 0.02832)

Conc2

=

47.4 / ( 48.469 x 0.02832 )

Conc2

=

34.5

Where:
Conc2=

0.02832 =HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.
Conversion factor from cubic feet to cubic meters.

118

3. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.
MR1(Inlet) =Conc1 x Qs(std) x 60 min/hr

MR1(Inlet) =2.15E-09 x 25641 x 60

MR1(Inlet) =3.31E-03

Where:
MR1(Inlet) =HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.

4. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.
MR2(Inlet) =MR1(Inlet) x 453.59 / 3600

MR2(Inlet) =3.31E-03 x 453.59 /3600

MR2(Inlet) =4.17E-04

Where:
MR2(Inlet) =HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.

453.59 =Conversion factor from pounds to grams.

3600 =

Conversion factor from hours to seconds.

5. HFPO Dimer Acid Removal Efficiency, %RE=

MR1(Inlet) - MR1(Outlet)-------------------------MR1(Inlet)

RE=(1.00E-01) - (3.60E-04)---------------------1.00E-01

RE

=

99.6

Where:RE=

Carbon Bed Removal Efficiency.

MR1(Inlet) =Carbon Bed Inlet HFPO Dimer Acid mass rate, lbs/hr.

MR1(Outlet) =Carbon Bed Outlet HFPO Dimer Acid mass rate, lbs/hr.

119

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR
VOLUMETRIC FLOW AND MOISTURE AND ISOKINETICS

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 1
Test Location: VES-Carbon Bed Inlet

Facility: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 07/16/19
Test Period: 1605-1841

1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (68 deg F, 29.92 in. Hg), dscf.

Vm(std) =Vm(std) =delta H
17.64 x Y x Vm x ( Pb + ------------ )13.6-------------------------------------------(Tm + 460)
0.966
17.64 x 1.0066 x 50.909 x ( 30.06 + --------------------- )13.6------------------------------------------------------------ = 48.469
101.96 + 460

Where:Vm(std) =Vm =Pb =delt H =Tm =Y =17.64 =
13.6 =

Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter,
corrected to standard conditions, dscf.
Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meterat meter conditions, dcf.
Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
Average pressure drop across the orifice meter, in H2O
Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.
Dry gas meter calibration factor.
Factor that includes ratio of standard temperature (528 deg R)
to standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), deg R/in. Hg.
Specific gravity of mercury.

2. Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected to standard conditions, scf.
Vw(std) =(0.04707 x Vwc) + (0.04715 x Wwsg)

Vw(std) =( 0.04707 x 12.0 ) + ( 0.04715 x 17.5 ) = 1.39

Where:Vw(std) =Vwc =Wwsg =
0.04707 =Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected tostandard conditions, scf.
Volume of liquid condensed in impingers, ml.
Weight of water vapor collected in silica gel, g.
Factor which includes the density of water(0.002201 lb/ml), the molecular weight of water(18.0 lb/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolutetemperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolute

0.04715 =pressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), ft3/ml.
Factor which includes the molecular weight of water(18.0 lb/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolutetemperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolutepressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), and453.6 g/lb, ft3/g.

120

3. Moisture contentbws =Vw(std)------------------------Vw(std) + Vm(std)

bws =

1.39
------------------------- = 0.028
1.39 + 48.469

Where:
bws =Proportion of water vapor, by volume, in the gas
stream, dimensionless.

4. Mole fraction of dry gas.
Md =1 - bws

Md =1 - 0.028 = 0.972

Where:
Md =Mole fraction of dry gas, dimensionless.

5. Dry molecular weight of gas stream, lb/lb-mole.
MWd =( 0.440 x % CO2 ) + ( 0.320 x % O2 ) + ( 0.280 x (% N2 + % CO) )MWd =( 0.440 x 0.0 ) + ( 0.320 x 20.9 ) + (0.280 x ( 79.1 + 0.00 ))

MWd =

28.84

Where:MWd =% CO2 =% O2 =% N2 =% CO =
0.440 =
0.320 =
0.280 =

Dry molecular weight , lb/lb-mole.
Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.
Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.
Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis.
Percent carbon monoxide by volume, dry basis.
Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide,
divided by 100.

6. Actual molecular weight of gas stream (wet basis), lb/lb-mole.
MWs =( MWd x Md ) + ( 18 x ( 1 - Md ))MWs =( 28.84 x 0.972 ) +( 18 ( 1 - 0.972 )) = 28.53

Where:
MWs =18 =Molecular weight of wet gas, lb/lb-mole.
Molecular weight of water, lb/lb-mole.

121

7. Average velocity of gas stream at actual conditions, ft/sec.
Ts (avg)
Vs =

Vs =

85.49 x Cp x ((delt p)1/2)avg x ( ---------------- )1/2
Ps x MWs
560
85.49 x 0.84 x 1.13927 x ( -------------------- )^1/2 = 66.5
29.66 x 28.53

Where:
Vs =85.49 =
Cp =
Ts =
Ps =
delt p =Average gas stream velocity, ft/sec.
(lb/lb-mole)(in. Hg)1/2
Pitot tube constant, ft/sec x -----------------------------------(deg R)(in H2O)
Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless.
Absolute gas stream temperature, deg R = Ts, deg F + 460.
P(static)
Absolute gas stack pressure, in. Hg. = Pb + -------------13.6
Velocity head of stack, in. H2O.

8. Average gas stream volumetric flow rate at actual conditions, wacf/min.
Qs(act) =60 x Vs x As

Qs(act) =60 x 66.5 x 7.07 = 28214

Where:Qs(act) =
As =
60 =

Volumetric flow rate of wet stack gas at actual
conditions, wacf/min.
Cross-sectional area of stack, ft2.
Conversion factor from seconds to minutes.

9. Average gas stream dry volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscf/min.

Qs(std) =Ps
17.64 x Md x ----- x Qs(act)Ts

Qs(std) =29.66
17.64 x 0.972 x -------------------- x 28214
559.6

Qs(std) =25641

Where:Qs(std) =Volumetric flow rate of dry stack gas at standard
conditions, dscf/min.

122

10. Isokinetic variation calculated from intermediate values, percent.

I =17.327 x Ts x Vm(std)----------------------------------Vs x O x Ps x Md x (Dn)2

I =17.327 x 560 x 48.469-------------------------------------------------- = 99.7
66.5 x 96 x 29.66 x 0.972 x (0.160)^2

Where:I =O =Dn =17.327 =Percent of isokinetic sampling.
Total sampling time, minutes.
Diameter of nozzle, inches.
Factor which includes standard temperature (528 deg R),
standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), the formula for
calculating area of circle D2/4, conversion of square
feet to square inches (144), conversion of seconds
to minutes (60), and conversion to percent (100),(in. Hg)(in2)(min)(deg R)(ft2)(sec)123

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORHFPO DIMER ACID (METHOD 0010)

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 1
Test Location: VES CBed Outlet

Plant: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 07/16/19
Test Period: 1605-1841

1. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

Conc1

=

W x 2.2046 x 10-9-----------------------------Vm(std)

Conc1

=

8.0 x 2.2046 x 10-9-----------------------------55.427

Conc1

=

3.18E-10

Where:W=

Weight of HFPO Dimer Acid collected in sample in ug.

Conc1

=

HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

2.2046x10-9 =Conversion factor from ug to lbs.

2. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.

Conc2

=

W / ( Vm(std) x 0.02832)

Conc2

=

8.0 / ( 55.427 x 0.02832 )

Conc2

=

5.1

Where:
Conc2=

0.02832 =HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.
Conversion factor from cubic feet to cubic meters.

124

3. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.
MR1(Inlet) =Conc1 x Qs(std) x 60 min/hr

MR1(Inlet) =3.18E-10 x 25043 x 60

MR1(Inlet) =4.78E-04

Where:
MR1(Inlet) =HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.

4. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.
MR2(Inlet) =MR1(Inlet) x 453.59 / 3600

MR2(Inlet) =4.78E-04 x 453.59 /3600

MR2(Inlet) =6.01E-05

Where:
MR2(Inlet) =HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.

453.59 =Conversion factor from pounds to grams.

3600 =

Conversion factor from hours to seconds.

5. HFPO Dimer Acid Removal Efficiency, %RE=

MR1(Inlet) - MR1(Outlet)-------------------------MR1(Inlet)

RE=(3.31E-03) - (4.78E-04)---------------------3.31E-03

RE

=

85.6

Where:RE=

Carbon Bed Removal Efficiency.

MR1(Inlet) =Carbon Bed Inlet HFPO Dimer Acid mass rate, lbs/hr.

MR1(Outlet) =Carbon Bed Outlet HFPO Dimer Acid mass rate, lbs/hr.

125

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR
VOLUMETRIC FLOW AND MOISTURE AND ISOKINETICS

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 1
Test Location: VES-Carbon Bed Outlet

Facility: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 07/16/19
Test Period: 1605-1841

1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (68 deg F, 29.92 in. Hg), dscf.

Vm(std) =Vm(std) =delta H
17.64 x Y x Vm x ( Pb + ------------ )13.6-------------------------------------------(Tm + 460)
1.260
17.64 x 1.0069 x 58.439 x ( 30.06 + --------------------- )13.6------------------------------------------------------------ = 55.427
104.67 + 460

Where:Vm(std) =Vm =Pb =delt H =Tm =Y =17.64 =
13.6 =

Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter,
corrected to standard conditions, dscf.
Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meterat meter conditions, dcf.
Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
Average pressure drop across the orifice meter, in H2O
Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.
Dry gas meter calibration factor.
Factor that includes ratio of standard temperature (528 deg R)
to standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), deg R/in. Hg.
Specific gravity of mercury.

2. Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected to standard conditions, scf.
Vw(std) =(0.04707 x Vwc) + (0.04715 x Wwsg)

Vw(std) =( 0.04707 x 20.0 ) + ( 0.04715 x 14.0 ) = 1.60

Where:Vw(std) =Vwc =Wwsg =
0.04707 =Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected tostandard conditions, scf.
Volume of liquid condensed in impingers, ml.
Weight of water vapor collected in silica gel, g.
Factor which includes the density of water(0.002201 lb/ml), the molecular weight of water(18.0 lb/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolutetemperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolute

0.04715 =pressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), ft3/ml.
Factor which includes the molecular weight of water(18.0 lb/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolutetemperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolutepressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), and453.6 g/lb, ft3/g.

126

3. Moisture contentbws =Vw(std)------------------------Vw(std) + Vm(std)

bws =

1.60
------------------------- = 0.028
1.60 + 55.427

Where:
bws =Proportion of water vapor, by volume, in the gas
stream, dimensionless.

4. Mole fraction of dry gas.
Md =1 - bws

Md =1 - 0.028 = 0.972

Where:
Md =Mole fraction of dry gas, dimensionless.

5. Dry molecular weight of gas stream, lb/lb-mole.
MWd =( 0.440 x % CO2 ) + ( 0.320 x % O2 ) + ( 0.280 x (% N2 + % CO) )MWd =( 0.440 x 0.0 ) + ( 0.320 x 20.9 ) + (0.280 x ( 79.1 + 0.00 ))

MWd =

28.84

Where:MWd =% CO2 =% O2 =% N2 =% CO =
0.440 =
0.320 =
0.280 =

Dry molecular weight , lb/lb-mole.
Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.
Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.
Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis.
Percent carbon monoxide by volume, dry basis.
Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide,
divided by 100.

6. Actual molecular weight of gas stream (wet basis), lb/lb-mole.
MWs =( MWd x Md ) + ( 18 x ( 1 - Md ))MWs =( 28.84 x 0.972 ) +( 18 ( 1 - 0.972 )) = 28.53

Where:
MWs =18 =Molecular weight of wet gas, lb/lb-mole.
Molecular weight of water, lb/lb-mole.

127

7. Average velocity of gas stream at actual conditions, ft/sec.
Ts (avg)
Vs =

Vs =

85.49 x Cp x ((delt p)1/2)avg x ( ---------------- )1/2
Ps x MWs
560
85.49 x 0.84 x 0.83005 x ( -------------------- )^1/2 = 48.0
30.24 x 28.53

Where:
Vs =85.49 =
Cp =
Ts =
Ps =
delt p =Average gas stream velocity, ft/sec.
(lb/lb-mole)(in. Hg)1/2
Pitot tube constant, ft/sec x -----------------------------------(deg R)(in H2O)
Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless.
Absolute gas stream temperature, deg R = Ts, deg F + 460.
P(static)
Absolute gas stack pressure, in. Hg. = Pb + -------------13.6
Velocity head of stack, in. H2O.

8. Average gas stream volumetric flow rate at actual conditions, wacf/min.
Qs(act) =60 x Vs x As

Qs(act) =60 x 48.0 x 9.39 = 27061

Where:Qs(act) =
As =
60 =

Volumetric flow rate of wet stack gas at actual
conditions, wacf/min.
Cross-sectional area of stack, ft2.
Conversion factor from seconds to minutes.

9. Average gas stream dry volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscf/min.

Qs(std) =Ps
17.64 x Md x ----- x Qs(act)Ts

Qs(std) =30.24
17.64 x 0.972 x -------------------- x 27061
560.2

Qs(std) =25043

Where:Qs(std) =Volumetric flow rate of dry stack gas at standard
conditions, dscf/min.

128

10. Isokinetic variation calculated from intermediate values, percent.

I =17.327 x Ts x Vm(std)----------------------------------Vs x O x Ps x Md x (Dn)2

I =17.327 x 560 x 55.427-------------------------------------------------- = 97.3
48.0 x 96 x 30.24 x 0.972 x (0.202)^2

Where:I =O =Dn =17.327 =Percent of isokinetic sampling.
Total sampling time, minutes.
Diameter of nozzle, inches.
Factor which includes standard temperature (528 deg R),
standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), the formula for
calculating area of circle D2/4, conversion of square
feet to square inches (144), conversion of seconds
to minutes (60), and conversion to percent (100),(in. Hg)(in2)(min)(deg R)(ft2)(sec)129

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORHFPO DIMER ACID (METHOD 0010)

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 3
Test Location: VE South Stack

Plant: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 07/17/19
Test Period: 1250-1502

1. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

Conc1

=

W x 2.2046 x 10-9-----------------------------Vm(std)

Conc1

=

2.0 x 2.2046 x 10-9-----------------------------47.822

Conc1

=

9.02E-11

Where:W=

Weight of HFPO Dimer Acid collected in sample in ug.

Conc1

=

Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

2.2046x10-9 =Conversion factor from ug to lbs.

2. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.

Conc2

=

W / ( Vm(std) x 0.02832)

Conc2

=

2.0 / ( 47.822 x 0.02832 )

Conc2

=

1.44

Where:
Conc2=

0.02832 =Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.
Conversion factor from cubic feet to cubic meters.

3. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.
MR1(Outlet) =Conc1 x Qs(std) x 60 min/hr

MR1(Outlet) =9.02E-11 x 23134 x 60

MR1(Outlet) =1.25E-04

Where:
MR1(Outlet) =Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.

4. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.
MR2(Outlet) =PMR1 x 453.59 / 3600

MR2(Outlet) =1.25E-04 x 453.59 /3600

MR2(Outlet) =1.58E-05

Where:
MR2(Outlet) =Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.

453.6 =

Conversion factor from pounds to grams.

3600 =

Conversion factor from hours to seconds.

130

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR
VOLUMETRIC FLOW AND MOISTURE AND ISOKINETICS

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 3
Test Location: VE South Stack

Facility: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 07/17/19
Test Period: 1250-1502

1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (68 deg F, 29.92 in. Hg), dscf.

Vm(std) =Vm(std) =delta H
17.64 x Y x Vm x ( Pb + ------------ )13.6-------------------------------------------(Tm + 460)
0.764
17.64 x 1.0008 x 50.263 x ( 30.07 + --------------------- )13.6------------------------------------------------------------ = 47.822
99.00 + 460

Where:Vm(std) =Vm =Pb =delt H =Tm =Y =17.64 =
13.6 =

Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter,
corrected to standard conditions, dscf.
Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meterat meter conditions, dcf.
Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
Average pressure drop across the orifice meter, in H2O
Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.
Dry gas meter calibration factor.
Factor that includes ratio of standard temperature (528 deg R)
to standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), deg R/in. Hg.
Specific gravity of mercury.

2. Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected to standard conditions, scf.
Vw(std) =(0.04707 x Vwc) + (0.04715 x Wwsg)

Vw(std) =( 0.04707 x 29.0 ) + ( 0.04715 x 12.9 ) = 1.97

Where:Vw(std) =Vwc =Wwsg =
0.04707 =Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected tostandard conditions, scf.
Volume of liquid condensed in impingers, ml.
Weight of water vapor collected in silica gel, g.
Factor which includes the density of water(0.002201 lb/ml), the molecular weight of water(18.0 lb/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolutetemperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolute

0.04715 =pressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), ft3/ml.
Factor which includes the molecular weight of water(18.0 lb/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolutetemperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolutepressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), and453.6 g/lb, ft3/g.

131

3. Moisture contentbws =Vw(std)------------------------Vw(std) + Vm(std)

bws =

1.97
------------------------- = 0.040
1.97 + 47.822

Where:
bws =Proportion of water vapor, by volume, in the gas
stream, dimensionless.

4. Mole fraction of dry gas.
Md =1 - bws

Md =1 - 0.040 = 0.960

Where:
Md =Mole fraction of dry gas, dimensionless.

5. Dry molecular weight of gas stream, lb/lb-mole.
MWd =( 0.440 x % CO2 ) + ( 0.320 x % O2 ) + ( 0.280 x (% N2 + % CO) )MWd =( 0.440 x 0.0 ) + ( 0.320 x 20.9 ) + (0.280 x ( 79.1 + 0.00 ))

MWd =

28.84

Where:MWd =% CO2 =% O2 =% N2 =% CO =
0.440 =
0.320 =
0.280 =

Dry molecular weight , lb/lb-mole.
Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.
Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.
Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis.
Percent carbon monoxide by volume, dry basis.
Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide,
divided by 100.

6. Actual molecular weight of gas stream (wet basis), lb/lb-mole.
MWs =( MWd x Md ) + ( 18 x ( 1 - Md ))MWs =( 28.84 x 0.960 ) +( 18 ( 1 - 0.960 )) = 28.41

Where:
MWs =18 =Molecular weight of wet gas, lb/lb-mole.
Molecular weight of water, lb/lb-mole.

132

7. Average velocity of gas stream at actual conditions, ft/sec.
Ts (avg)
Vs =

Vs =

85.49 x Cp x ((delt p)1/2)avg x ( ---------------- )1/2
Ps x MWs
560
85.49 x 0.84 x 0.75569 x ( -------------------- )^1/2 = 43.8
30.25 x 28.41

Where:
Vs =85.49 =
Cp =
Ts =
Ps =
delt p =Average gas stream velocity, ft/sec.
(lb/lb-mole)(in. Hg)1/2
Pitot tube constant, ft/sec x -----------------------------------(deg R)(in H2O)
Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless.
Absolute gas stream temperature, deg R = Ts, deg F + 460.
P(static)
Absolute gas stack pressure, in. Hg. = Pb + -------------13.6
Velocity head of stack, in. H2O.

8. Average gas stream volumetric flow rate at actual conditions, wacf/min.
Qs(act) =60 x Vs x As

Qs(act) =60 x 43.8 x 9.62 = 25293

Where:Qs(act) =
As =
60 =

Volumetric flow rate of wet stack gas at actual
conditions, wacf/min.
Cross-sectional area of stack, ft2.
Conversion factor from seconds to minutes.

9. Average gas stream dry volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscf/min.

Qs(std) =Ps
17.64 x Md x ----- x Qs(act)Ts

Qs(std) =30.25
17.64 x 0.960 x -------------------- x 25293
560.4

Qs(std) =23134

Where:Qs(std) =Volumetric flow rate of dry stack gas at standard
conditions, dscf/min.

133

10. Isokinetic variation calculated from intermediate values, percent.

I =17.327 x Ts x Vm(std)----------------------------------Vs x O x Ps x Md x (Dn)2

I =17.327 x 560 x 47.822-------------------------------------------------- = 105.2
43.8 x 96 x 30.25 x 0.960 x (0.190)^2

Where:I =O =Dn =17.327 =Percent of isokinetic sampling.
Total sampling time, minutes.
Diameter of nozzle, inches.
Factor which includes standard temperature (528 deg R),
standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), the formula for
calculating area of circle D2/4, conversion of square
feet to square inches (144), conversion of seconds
to minutes (60), and conversion to percent (100),(in. Hg)(in2)(min)(deg R)(ft2)(sec)134

APPENDIX E
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION RECORDSIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

135

8/20/2019

INTERFERENCE CHECK
Date: 12/4/14-12/5/14
Analyzer Type: Servomex - O2
Model No: 4900
Serial No: 49000-652921
Calibration Span: 21.09 %Pollutant: 21.09% O2 - CC418692

ANALYZER RESPONSE
INTERFERENT GASINTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE (%)

INTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE, WITH
BACKGROUND POLLUTANT (%)% OF CALIBRATION
SPAN(a)CO2 (30.17% CC199689)

0.00
.

-0.01

0.00

NO (445 ppm CC346681)

0.00

0.02

0.11

NO2 (23.78 ppm CC500749)

NA

NA

NA

N2O (90.4 ppm CC352661)

0.00

0.05

0.24

CO (461.5 ppm XC006064B)

0.00

0.02

0.00

SO2 (451.2 ppm CC409079)

0.00

0.05

0.23

CH4 (453.1 ppm SG901795)

NA

NA

NA

H2 (552 ppm ALM048043)

0.00

0.09

0.44

HCl (45.1 ppm CC17830)

0.00

0.03

0.14

NH3 (9.69 ppm CC58181)

0.00

0.01

0.03

(a)

TOTAL INTERFERENCE RESPONSE

1.20

METHOD SPECIFICATION< 2.5%The larger of the absolute values obtained for the interferent tested with and without the pollutant present was used in summing the interferences.

Chad Walker

136

INTERFERENCE CHECK
Date: 12/4/14-12/5/14
Analyzer Type: Servomex - CO2
Model No: 4900
Serial No: 49000-652921
Calibration Span: 16.65%
Pollutant: 16.65% CO2 - CC418692

ANALYZER RESPONSE
INTERFERENT GASINTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE (%)

INTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE, WITH
BACKGROUND POLLUTANT (%)% OF CALIBRATION
SPAN(a)CO2 (30.17% CC199689)

NA
.

NA

NA

NO (445 ppm CC346681)

0.00

0.02

0.10

NO2 (23.78 ppm CC500749)

0.00

0.00

0.02

N2O (90.4 ppm CC352661)

0.00

0.01

0.04

CO (461.5 ppm XC006064B)

0.00

0.01

0.00

SO2 (451.2 ppm CC409079)

0.00

0.11

0.64

CH4 (453.1 ppm SG901795)

0.00

0.07

0.44

H2 (552 ppm ALM048043)

0.00

0.04

0.22

HCl (45.1 ppm CC17830)

0.10

0.06

0.60

NH3 (9.69 ppm CC58181)

0.00

0.02

0.14

(a)

TOTAL INTERFERENCE RESPONSE

2.19

METHOD SPECIFICATION< 2.5%The larger of the absolute values obtained for the interferent tested with and without the pollutant present was used in summing the interferences.

Chad Walker

137

Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA, LLC
6141 Easton Road
Bldg 1Plumsteadville, PA 18949
Airgas.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA Protocol
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:Laboratory:
PGVP Number:Gas Code:

E03NI79E15A00E4
ALM053372
124 - Plumsteadville - PA
A12019
CO2,O2,BALN
Expiration Date:

Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
Feb 26, 2027

160-401424145-1
150.5 CF2015 PSIG
590
Feb 26, 2019

Certification performed in accordance with “EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)” document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analyticaluncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
volume/volume basis unless otherwise noted.
Do Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e. 0.7 megapascals.

ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component

Requested
Concentration

ActualConcentration

ProtocolMethodTotal Relative
Uncertainty

Assay
Dates

CARBON DIOXIDEOXYGENNITROGEN

9.000 %
12.00 %
Balance9.020 %
12.07 %

G1
G1+/- 0.6% NIST Traceable+/- 0.3% NIST Traceable-

02/26/2019
02/26/2019

CALIBRATION STANDARDSType

Lot ID

Cylinder No

NTRM
NTRM

06150716060507

K014984
CC401541

Concentration

Uncertainty

13.94 % CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN
23.204 % OXYGEN/NITROGEN

0.57%
0.2%

Expiration Date
Jan 30, 2024
Dec 24, 2021

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Instrument/Make/Model

Analytical Principle

Last Multipoint Calibration

HORIBA VA5011 T5V6VU9P NDIR CO2
SIEMENS OXYMAT 61 S01062 O2

NDIRPARAMAGNETIC

Feb 12, 2019
Feb 18, 2019

Triad Data Available Upon Request

Signature on file

Approved for Release

138

Page 1 of 160-401424145-1

Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA, LLC
600 Union Landing Road
Cinnaminson, NJ 08077-0000
Airgas.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA Protocol
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:Laboratory:
PGVP Number:Gas Code:

E03NI62E15A0224
CC112489
124 - Riverton (SAP) - NJ
B52018
CO2,O2,BALN
Expiration Date:

Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
May 12, 2026

82-401196512-1
157.2 CF2015 PSIG
590
May 12, 2018

Certification performed in accordance with “EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)” document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analyticaluncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
volume/volume basis unless otherwise noted.
Do Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e. 0.7 megapascals.

ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component

Requested
Concentration

ActualConcentration

ProtocolMethodTotal Relative
Uncertainty

Assay
Dates

CARBON DIOXIDEOXYGENNITROGEN

17.00 %
21.00 %
Balance17.05 %
20.98 %

G1
G1+/- 0.7% NIST Traceable+/- 0.5% NIST Traceable-

05/12/2018
05/12/2018

CALIBRATION STANDARDSType

Lot ID

Cylinder No

NTRM
NTRM

13060731
09061420

CC413777
CC273671

Concentration

Uncertainty

16.939 % CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN
22.53 % OXYGEN/NITROGEN+/- 0.6%+/- 0.4%

Expiration Date
May 08, 2019
Mar 08, 2019

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Instrument/Make/Model

Analytical Principle

Last Multipoint Calibration

Horiba VIA 510-CO2-19GYCXEG
Horiba MPA 510-O2-7TWMJ041

NDIR
Paramagnetic

Apr 19, 2018
Apr 19, 2018

Triad Data Available Upon Request

Signature on file

Approved for Release

139

Page 1 of 82-401196512-1

Long Cal and Temperature Cal Datasheet for Standard Dry Gas Meter Console
Calibrator

MDW

Meter Box Number

Date 12-Feb-19

Setting
Orifice
Manometerin H20
(∆H)
0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

3.0

Gas Volume
Wet Test
Dry gas Meter
Meter
ft3
ft3
(Vw)
(Vd)
616.9705.0
621.960
4.990
623.9355.0
628.930
4.995
629.91010.0
639.900
9.990
640.88510.0
650.8759.990
651.91510.0
661.955
10.040

Ambient Temp

Wet Test Meter Number

P-2952

Dry Gas Meter Number

17485128

Temp Reference Source

Wet Test
Meter
o
F
(Tw)
72.0

72.0

72.0

72.0

70.0

Dry Gas MeteroOutlet, F
(Tdo)
76.00
77.00
76.50
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
78.00
78.00
78.00

o

Inlet, F
(Tdi)
76.00
77.00
76.50
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
78.00
78.00
78.00

Average, F(Td)

Time, min
(O)

Y

∆H

76.5

12.8

1.0092

1.841977.0

9.3

1.00791.942977.0

15.3

1.0067

1.971977.0

13.3

1.0054

1.986878.0

11.0

1.00362.0195

Average

1.0066

1.9526

0 - Time of calibration run
Pb - Barometric PressureY=∆H - Pressure differential acrossorificeY - Ratio of accuracy of wet test
meter to dry gas meter

Vw ∗ Pb ∗ ( td + 460 )(∆H)  ∗ (tw + 460 )
Vd ∗ Pb +
13
.6 


 0.0317 ∗ ∆H   (tw + 460 ) ∗ O ∆H = 
∗Vw Pb ∗ (td + 460 )  

Temperature Reading from Individual Thermocouple Input 1
o

C
32
212
932
1832

F

1
32
212
932
1832

1 - Channel Temps must agree with +/- 5oF or 3oC
2 - Acceptable Temperature Difference less than 1.5 %

2
32
213
933
1833

Channel Number
3
4
32
32
213
212
933
932
1833
1832

(

( )

5
32
212
932
1832

) (
( )

2

Average
Temperature
Reading

Temp
Difference 2
(%)

32.0
212.4
932.4
1832.4

0.0%
-0.1%
0.0%
0.0%

6

( )

)

 Re ference Temp o F + 460 − Test Temp o F + 460 
Temp Diff = Re ference Temp o F + 460



140

29.75

Calibration ResultsoSelect Temperatureo72
Thermocouple Simulatoro(Accuracy +/- 1 F)

Baro Press, in
Hg ( Pb)

Temperatures

Vw - Gas Volume passing through the wet test meter
Vd - Gas Volume passing through the dry gas meterTw - Temp of gas in the wet test meter
Tdi - Temp of the inlet gas of the dry gas meter
Tdo - Temp of the outlet gas of the dry gas meter
Td - Average temp of the gas in the dry gas meter

Reference
Temperature

31

Y Factor Calibration Check Calculation
MODIFIED METHOD 0010 TEST TRAINVES CARBON BED INLETMETER BOX NO. 31
07/16/19 and 07/17/19
Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

MWd = Dry molecular weight source gas, lb/lb-mole.
0.32 = Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
0.44 = Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
0.28 = Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide, divided by 100.
% CO2 = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.

0.0

0.0

0.0

% O2 = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.

20.9

20.9

20.9

28.84

28.84

28.84

102.0

93.6

102.8

561.96553.58562.75

0.97
30.06

1.00
30.09

1.02
30.06

30.13

30.16

30.13

50.9091.0066
1.953051.412
1.0066
1.953051.7671.0066
1.95300.965696

0.9758960.9859
96

1.008

1.000

1.013

0.14

0.66

0.64

MWd = ( 0.32 * O2 ) + ( 0.44 * CO2 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( CO2 + O2 )))MWd = ( 0.32 * 20.9 ) + ( 0.44 * 0 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( 0 + 20.9 )))MWd = ( 6.69 ) + ( 0.00 ) + ( 22.15 )MWd =oTma = Source Temperature, absolute( R)
Tm = Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.
Tma = Ts + 460
Tma = 101.96 + 460
Tma =Ps = Absolute meter pressure, inches Hg.
13.60 = Specific gravity of mercury.
delta H = Avg pressure drop across the orifice meter during sampling, in H2O
Pb = Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
Pm = Pb + (delta H / 13.6)
Pm = 30.06 + ( 0.96625 / 13.6)
Pm =Yqa = dry gas meter calibration check value, dimensionless.
0.03 = (29.92/528)(0.75)2 (in. Hg/°/R) cfm2.
29.00 = dry molecular weight of air, lb/lb-mole.
Vm = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter at meter conditions, dcf.
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor (based on full calibration)
Delta H@ = Dry Gas meter orifice calibration coefficient, in. H2O.
avg SQRT Delta H = Avg SQRT press. drop across the orifice meter during sampling , in. H2O
O = Total sampling time, minutes.

Yqa = (O / Vm ) * SQRT ( 0.0319 * Tma * 29 ) / ( Delta H@ * Pm * MWd ) * avg SQRT Delta H
Yqa = ( 96.00 / 50.91 ) * SQRT ( 0.0319 * 561.96 * 29 ) / ( 1.95 * 30.13 * 28.84 ) * 0.97
Yqa = 1.886 * SQRT 519.868 / 1,696.822 * 0.97
Yqa =Diff = Absolute difference between Yqa and Y
Diff = (( Y - Yqa ) / Y ) * 100
Diff = (( 1.0066 - 1.008 ) / 1.0066 ) * 100
Average Diff = 0.48
Allowable = 5.0

7/31/201911:07 AM

141

071619 VES CB Inlet

Long Cal and Temperature Cal Datasheet for Standard Dry Gas Meter Console
Calibrator

MDW

Meter Box Number

Date 10-Sep-18

Setting
Orifice
Manometerin H20
(∆H)
0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

3.0

Gas Volume
Wet Test
Dry gas Meter
Meter
ft3
ft3
(Vw)
(Vd)
885.8535.0
890.8224.969
892.8105.0
897.795
4.985
898.79910.0
908.81010.011915.87010.0
925.8309.960
926.87010.0
936.870
10.000

Wet Test Meter Number

P-2952

Dry Gas Meter Number

14244707

Temperatures
Wet Test
Dry Gas
Meter
Meter
o
Outlet, oF
F
(Tdo)
(Tw)
75.00
73.0
76.00
75.50
76.00
73.0
77.00
76.50
77.00
73.0
78.00
77.50
78.00
73.0
79.00
78.50
79.00
73.0
80.00
79.50

Vw - Gas Volume passing through the wet test meter
Vd - Gas Volume passing through the dry gas meterTw - Temp of gas in the wet test meter
Tdi - Temp of the inlet gas of the dry gas meter
Tdo - Temp of the outlet gas of the dry gas meter
Td - Average temp of the gas in the dry gas meter

Reference
Temperature

12

Ambient Temp
Temp Reference Source

Baro Press, in
Hg ( Pb)

Time, min
(O)

Y

∆H

12.60

1.0097

1.78239.1

1.00711.855915.20

1.0036

1.938113.1

1.00941.915810.70

1.00481.91371.00691.8812

0 - Time of calibration run
Pb - Barometric PressureY=∆H - Pressure differential acrossorificeY - Ratio of accuracy of wet test
meter to dry gas meter

Vw ∗ Pb ∗ ( td + 460 )(∆H) ∗ (tw + 460 )
Vd ∗ Pb +
13
.6 


 0.0317 ∗ ∆H   (tw + 460 ) ∗ O ∆H = 
∗Vw Pb ∗ (td + 460 )  

Temperature Reading from Individual Thermocouple Input 1
o

C
32
212
932
1832

F

1
32
212
932
1834

1 - Channel Temps must agree with +/- 5oF or 3oC
2 - Acceptable Temperature Difference less than 1.5 %

2
32
212
932
1834

29.96

Calibration Results

Select Temperatureo72
Thermocouple Simulatoro(Accuracy +/- 1 F)

Channel Number
3
4
32
32
212
212
932
932
1834
1834

(

( )

5
32
212
932
1834

) (
( )

( )

6
32
212
932
1834

)

 Re ference Temp o F + 460 − Test Temp o F + 460 
Temp Diff = Re ference Temp o F + 460



142

2

Average
Temperature
Reading

Temp
Difference 2
(%)

32.0
212.0
932.0
1834.0

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-0.1%

Y Factor Calibration Check Calculation
MODIFIED METHOD 0010 TEST TRAINVES CARBON BED OUTLETMETER BOX NO. 12
07/16/19 and 07/17/19
Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

MWd = Dry molecular weight source gas, lb/lb-mole.
0.32 = Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
0.44 = Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
0.28 = Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide, divided by 100.
% CO2 = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.

0.0

0.0

0.0

% O2 = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.

20.9

20.9

20.9

28.84

28.84

28.84

104.7

96.0

107.1

564.67556.04567.13

1.26
30.06

1.31
30.09

1.32
30.06

30.15

30.19

30.16

58.4391.00691.881258.943
1.00691.881259.8281.00691.88121.110296

1.132296

1.1367
96

1.031

1.033

1.033

2.39

2.59

2.59

MWd = ( 0.32 * O2 ) + ( 0.44 * CO2 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( CO2 + O2 )))MWd = ( 0.32 * 20.9 ) + ( 0.44 * 0 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( 0 + 20.9 )))MWd = ( 6.69 ) + ( 0.00 ) + ( 22.15 )MWd =oTma = Source Temperature, absolute( R)
Tm = Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.
Tma = Ts + 460
Tma = 104.67 + 460
Tma =Ps = Absolute meter pressure, inches Hg.
13.60 = Specific gravity of mercury.
delta H = Avg pressure drop across the orifice meter during sampling, in H2O
Pb = Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
Pm = Pb + (delta H / 13.6)
Pm = 30.06 + ( 1.26 / 13.6)
Pm =Yqa = dry gas meter calibration check value, dimensionless.
0.03 = (29.92/528)(0.75)2 (in. Hg/°/R) cfm2.
29.00 = dry molecular weight of air, lb/lb-mole.
Vm = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter at meter conditions, dcf.
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor (based on full calibration)
Delta H@ = Dry Gas meter orifice calibration coefficient, in. H2O.
avg SQRT Delta H = Avg SQRT press. drop across the orifice meter during sampling , in. H2O
O = Total sampling time, minutes.

Yqa = (O / Vm ) * SQRT ( 0.0319 * Tma * 29 ) / ( Delta H@ * Pm * MWd ) * avg SQRT Delta H
Yqa = ( 96.00 / 58.44 ) * SQRT ( 0.0319 * 564.67 * 29 ) / ( 1.88 * 30.15 * 28.84 ) * 1.11
Yqa = 1.643 * SQRT 522.373 / 1,635.525 * 1.11
Yqa =Diff = Absolute difference between Yqa and Y
Diff = (( Y - Yqa ) / Y ) * 100
Diff = (( 1.0069 - 1.031 ) / 1.0069 ) * 100
Average Diff = 2.52
Allowable = 5.0

7/31/201911:10 AM

143

071619 VES CB Out

Long Cal and Temperature Cal Datasheet for Standard Dry Gas Meter Console
Calibrator

MDW

Meter Box Number

Date 12-Jul-19

Setting
Orifice
Manometerin H20
(∆H)
0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

3.0

Gas Volume
Wet Test
Dry gas Meter
Meter
ft3
ft3
(Vw)
(Vd)
449.9455.0
454.9595.014
456.0645.0
461.0905.026
462.19510.0
472.200
10.005474.42510.0
484.425
10.000486.01010.0
496.100
10.090

Ambient Temp

Wet Test Meter Number

P-2952

Dry Gas Meter Number

16787479

Temp Reference Source

Wet Test
Meter
o
F
(Tw)
72.0

72.0

72.0

72.0

72.0

Dry Gas MeteroOutlet, F
(Tdo)
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00

o

Inlet, F
(Tdi)
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00
77.00

Average, F(Td)

Time, min
(O)

Y

∆H

76.0

12.8

1.0035

1.843076.0

9.0

0.99981.822376.0

15.1

1.0033

1.923777.0

13.0

1.0044

1.897577.0

10.7

0.99301.9283

Average1.00081.88300 - Time of calibration run
Pb - Barometric PressureY=∆H - Pressure differential acrossorificeY - Ratio of accuracy of wet test
meter to dry gas meter

Vw ∗ Pb ∗ ( td + 460 )(∆H)  ∗ (tw + 460 )
Vd ∗ Pb +
13
.6 


 0.0317 ∗ ∆H   (tw + 460 ) ∗ O ∆H = 
∗Vw Pb ∗ (td + 460 )  

Temperature Reading from Individual Thermocouple Input 1
o

C
32
212
932
1832

F

1
32
212
932
1831

1 - Channel Temps must agree with +/- 5oF or 3oC
2 - Acceptable Temperature Difference less than 1.5 %

2
32
212
932
1831

Channel Number
3
4
32
31
212
211
932
931
1831
1830

(

( )

5
31
211
931
1830

) (
( )

2

Average
Temperature
Reading

Temp
Difference 2
(%)

31.6
211.6
931.6
1830.6

0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%

6

( )

)

 Re ference Temp o F + 460 − Test Temp o F + 460 
Temp Diff = Re ference Temp o F + 460



144

29.76

Calibration ResultsoSelect Temperatureo72
Thermocouple Simulatoro(Accuracy +/- 1 F)

Baro Press, in
Hg ( Pb)

Temperatures

Vw - Gas Volume passing through the wet test meter
Vd - Gas Volume passing through the dry gas meterTw - Temp of gas in the wet test meter
Tdi - Temp of the inlet gas of the dry gas meter
Tdo - Temp of the outlet gas of the dry gas meter
Td - Average temp of the gas in the dry gas meter

Reference
Temperature

27

Y Factor Calibration Check Calculation
MODIFIED METHOD 0010 TEST TRAIN
VE SOUTH STACKMETER BOX NO. 27
07/16/2019 & 07/17/2019
Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

MWd = Dry molecular weight source gas, lb/lb-mole.
0.32 = Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
0.44 = Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
0.28 = Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide, divided by 100.
% CO2 = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.

0.0

0.0

0.0

% O2 = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.

20.9

20.9

20.9

28.84

28.84

28.84

98.5

87.9

99.0

558.46547.88559.00

0.79
30.00

0.79
30.07

0.76
30.07

30.06

30.13

30.13

50.9101.00081.833049.5251.00081.833050.2631.00081.83300.885296

0.8859960.873796

0.95180.96880.9509

4.90

3.20

4.99

MWd = ( 0.32 * O2 ) + ( 0.44 * CO2 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( CO2 + O2 )))MWd = ( 0.32 * 20.9 ) + ( 0.44 * 0 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( 0 + 20.9 )))MWd = ( 6.69 ) + ( 0.00 ) + ( 22.15 )MWd =oTma = Source Temperature, absolute( R)
Tm = Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.
Tma = Ts + 460
Tma = 98.46 + 460
Tma =Ps = Absolute meter pressure, inches Hg.
13.60 = Specific gravity of mercury.
delta H = Avg pressure drop across the orifice meter during sampling, in H2O
Pb = Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
Pm = Pb + (delta H / 13.6)
Pm = 30 + ( 0.785416666666667 / 13.6)
Pm =Yqa = dry gas meter calibration check value, dimensionless.
0.03 = (29.92/528)(0.75)2 (in. Hg/°/R) cfm2.
29.00 = dry molecular weight of air, lb/lb-mole.
Vm = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter at meter conditions, dcf.
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor (based on full calibration)
Delta H@ = Dry Gas meter orifice calibration coefficient, in. H2O.
avg SQRT Delta H = Avg SQRT press. drop across the orifice meter during sampling , in. H2O
O = Total sampling time, minutes.

Yqa = (O / Vm ) * SQRT ( 0.0319 * Tma * 29 ) / ( Delta H@ * Pm * MWd ) * avg SQRT Delta H
Yqa = ( 96.00 / 50.91 ) * SQRT ( 0.0319 * 558.46 * 29 ) / ( 1.83 * 30.06 * 28.84 ) * 0.89
Yqa = 1.886 * SQRT 516.630 / 1,588.863 * 0.89
Yqa =Diff = Absolute difference between Yqa and Y
Diff = (( Y - Yqa ) / Y ) * 100
Diff = (( 1.0008 - 0.952 ) / 1.0008 ) * 100
Average Diff = 4.36
Allowable = 5.0

7/31/201911:11 AM

145

071619 VES stackType S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
P-706

Pitot Tube Identification Number:
Inspection Date

2/19/19 Individual Conducting Inspection

A-Side Plane
Dt
A
B

PB

B-Side Plane

1.05 Dt < P < 1.5 Dt
AKSDistance to A Plane (PA) - inches
Distance to B Plane (PB) - inches
Pitot OD (Dt) - inchesPA

If all Criteria PASS
Cp is equal to 0.84
0.45
0.45
0.375

PASS/FAIL
PASS
PASS

PA must Equal PB

B

Are Open Faces Aligned
Perpendicular to the Tube Axis

YES

NO

PASS

Face Opening
Planes

Q1

Q1

A

Q2

B

Angle of Q1 from vertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)Angle of Q2 from vertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

A
B

0

PASS

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Horizontal offset between A andB Tubes (Z) - inches

0.006

PASS

Vertical offset between A and B
Tubes (W) - inches

0.012

PASS

Distance between Sample
Nozzle and Pitot (X) - inches

0.79

PASS

Q1 and Q2 must be < 10o
B

B

Flow

A

Flow

A

B1(+)

B1(-)

B2(+ or -)B
A

B1(+ or -)B1 or B2 must be < 5oZBZ mustA be < 0.125 inches

B

A

W

W must be < 0.03125 inches

X
Sampling

D

X must be > 0.75 inches
Impact Pressure
Opening Plane

Nozzle Entry Plane

Impact Pressure
Opening Plane isabove the Nozzle
Entry Plane

YES

NO

NA

2 inchTemperature Sensor

DtType S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

NO

NA

3 inchTemperature Sensor
3/4 inch

Dt

Type S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

146

NA

NO

Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
P-376

Pitot Tube Identification Number:
Inspection Date

2/19/18 Individual Conducting Inspection

A-Side Plane
Dt
A
B

PB

B-Side Plane

1.05 Dt < P < 1.5 Dt
AKSDistance to A Plane (PA) - inches
Distance to B Plane (PB) - inches
Pitot OD (Dt) - inchesPA

If all Criteria PASS
Cp is equal to 0.84
0.417
0.417
0.375

PASS/FAIL
PASS
PASS

PA must Equal PB

B

Are Open Faces Aligned
Perpendicular to the Tube Axis

YES

NO

PASS

Face Opening
Planes

Q2

Q1

Q1

B
A

Angle of Q1 from vertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)Angle of Q2 from vertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

A
B

2

PASS

1

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)

2

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

2

PASS

Horizontal offset between A andB Tubes (Z) - inches

0.028

PASS

Vertical offset between A and B
Tubes (W) - inches

0.012

PASS

Distance between Sample
Nozzle and Pitot (X) - inches

0.984

PASS

Q1 and Q2 must be < 10o
B

B

Flow

A

Flow

A

B1(+)

B1(-)

B2(+ or -)B
A

B1(+ or -)B1 or B2 must be < 5oZ

BA

Z must be < 0.125 inches

B

A

W

W must be < 0.03125 inches

X
Sampling

D

X must be > 0.75 inches
Impact Pressure
Opening Plane

Nozzle Entry Plane

Impact Pressure
Opening Plane isabove the Nozzle
Entry Plane

YES

NO

NA

2 inchTemperature Sensor

DtType S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

NO

NA

3 inchTemperature Sensor
3/4 inch

Dt

Type S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

147

NA

NO

Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
P-700

Pitot Tube Identification Number:
Inspection Date

2/19/19 Individual Conducting Inspection

A-Side Plane
Dt
A
B

PB

B-Side Plane

1.05 Dt < P < 1.5 Dt
AksDistance to A Plane (PA) - inches
Distance to B Plane (PB) - inches
Pitot OD (Dt) - inchesPA

If all Criteria PASS
Cp is equal to 0.84
0.459
0.459
0.375

PASS/FAIL
PASS
PASS

PA must Equal PB

B

Are Open Faces Aligned
Perpendicular to the Tube Axis

YES

NO

PASS

Face Opening
Planes

Q2

Q1

Q1

B

A

Angle of Q1 from vertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)Angle of Q2 from vertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

A
B

0

PASS

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Horizontal offset between A andB Tubes (Z) - inches

0.003

PASS

Vertical offset between A and B
Tubes (W) - inches

0.012

PASS

Distance between Sample
Nozzle and Pitot (X) - inches

0.93

PASS

Q1 and Q2 must be < 10o
B

B

Flow

A

Flow

A

B1(+)

B1(-)

B2(+ or -)B
A

B1(+ or -)B1 or B2 must be < 5oZBZ mustA be < 0.125 inches

B

A

W

W must be < 0.03125 inches

X
Sampling

D

X must be > 0.75 inches
Impact Pressure
Opening Plane

Nozzle Entry Plane

Impact Pressure
Opening Plane isabove the Nozzle
Entry Plane

YES

NO

NA

2 inchTemperature Sensor

DtType S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

NO

NA

3 inchTemperature Sensor
3/4 inch

Dt

Type S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

148

NA

NO

Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
P-695

Pitot Tube Identification Number:
Inspection Date

2/19/19 Individual Conducting Inspection

A-Side Plane
Dt
A
B

PB

B-Side Plane

1.05 Dt < P < 1.5 Dt
AksDistance to A Plane (PA) - inches
Distance to B Plane (PB) - inches
Pitot OD (Dt) - inchesPA

If all Criteria PASS
Cp is equal to 0.84
0.46
0.46
0.375

PASS/FAIL
PASS
PASS

PA must Equal PB

B

Are Open Faces Aligned
Perpendicular to the Tube Axis

YES

NO

PASS

Face Opening
Planes

Q2

Q1

Q1

B

A

Angle of Q1 from vertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)Angle of Q2 from vertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

A
B

0

PASS

1

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Horizontal offset between A andB Tubes (Z) - inches

0.006

PASS

Vertical offset between A and B
Tubes (W) - inches

0.018

PASS

Distance between Sample
Nozzle and Pitot (X) - inches

0.78

PASS

Q1 and Q2 must be < 10o
B

B

Flow

A

Flow

A

B1(+)

B1(-)

B2(+ or -)B
A

B1(+ or -)B1 or B2 must be < 5oZBZ mustA be < 0.125 inches

B

A

W

W must be < 0.03125 inches

X
Sampling

D

X must be > 0.75 inches
Impact Pressure
Opening Plane

Nozzle Entry Plane

Impact Pressure
Opening Plane isabove the Nozzle
Entry Plane

YES

NO

NA

2 inchTemperature Sensor

DtType S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

NO

NA

3 inchTemperature Sensor
3/4 inch

Dt

Type S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

149

NA

NO

APPENDIX F
LIST OF PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

150

8/20/2019

The following WESTON employees participated in this project.
Paul Meeter

Senior Project Manager

Jeff O’Neill

Team Member

Matt Winkeler

Team Member

Nick Guarino

Team Member

Kris AnsleyTeam Member

Paul Greene

Team Member

Steve Rathfon

Team Member

Jack MillsTeam Member

Colin Mihalak

Team Member

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.016\VES CB AND STACK REPORT JULY 2019-AMD

151

8/20/2019