IPSI Case Study Summary Sheet
Please submit this form along with your case study. We ask that you keep your responses here as concise
as possible. This information will be posted on the IPSI website unless otherwise requested. Please informthe IPSI Secretariat if there are any responses you would not like made public.

Basic Information
Title of case study

Satoumi areas and networks in Taiwan: the integrity and connection among forests, rivers, humansettlement and seas
Submitting IPSI member organization(s)Fisheries Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan
Other contributing organization(s) (IPSI members and/or non-members)

Our partners include: (1) Governmental agencies that can provide funding and policy supports;(2) Universities that can offer technical assistance and professional suggestions and ideas; (3) NGOs
that can work collaboratively for promoting satoumi, such as community development associations,
local organizations, and fishers’ associations.
Author(s) and affiliation(s)Dr. Chen, Jyun-Long (Brad)- Associate Researcher, Fisheries Research Institute, Council ofAgriculture, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Mr. Hsu, Kang (Gordon)- Research Assistant, Fisheries Research Institute, Council of Agriculture,
Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Format of case study (manuscript or audiovisual)manuscript

Language

EnglishKeywords (3-5 key concepts included in the case study)

Satoumi, coastal ecosystem, environmental education, sustainable fishery, collaborative governance
Date of submission (or update, if this is an update of an existing case study)
Web link (of the case study or lead organization if
available for more information)

Under construction

June 15, 2021

Geographical Information
Country (where site(s) or activities described in the case study are located – can be multiple, or even “global”)

Taiwan, ROC. (Chinese Taipei)
Location(s) (within the country or countries – leave blank if specific location(s) cannot be identified)

Northeast Taiwan, including:Dong’ao community and Fenniaolin fishing harbor, Yilan county
Mao’ao community and Mao’ao fishing harbor, New Taipei city
Longitude/latitude or Google Maps link (if location is identified)Dong’ao community (24°31'00.2"N 121°50'02.7"E); Fenniaolin fishing harbor (24°29'51.2"N

121°50'34.2"E)
Mao’ao community (25°00'43.9"N 121°59'22.7"E); Mao’ao fishing harbor (25°00'44.7"N
121°59'29.3"E)
Ecosystem(s) (please place an “x” in all appropriate boxes)
ForestGrassland

Agricultural

In-land water

Dryland

Mountain

Urban/peri-urban

Other (Please specify)

Coastalx

Socioeconomic and environmental characteristics of the area

Taiwan’s coastal regions, especially northeastern Taiwan, are home to a thriving fishing industry.
In the coastal waters of this region, the upwellings attract abundant marine life, which constitute avaluable traditional fishing ground (Wang et al., 2013). The marine environment in northeastern Taiwan
is ideal for capture fishery. The study sites described in this case study are Mao’ao (New Taipei City)and Dong’ao (Yilan County), both located in remote and rural areas. Both of these communities exhibit
problems such as the out-migration of young adults, an increasingly aging population in the fisheryindustry, and a shortage of employment opportunities (Liu et al., 2001). In addition, marine resources
are increasingly exploited. Therefore, coastal fishing communities in these areas must consider the
implementation of new developmental trends such as resource conservation management andintegration of industrial development. The socioeconomic and environmental characteristics of Mao’ao
and Dong’ao are described in the following section.

Mao’ao community:
Socioeconomic characteristics:
Mao’ao community is located close to Mao’ao fishing harbor and currently comprises 70
households with a total population of 250 people (the permanent population comprises approximately
100 people) (Figure 1). The main facility for spiritual practice is Li-yang shrine. The local elementary

school (Fulien) has only five enrolled students, which illustrates how the young generation has alreadylargely moved away. As mentioned in the introduction, the problems facing the community are
persistent out-migration of young adults and an increasingly aging population in the fishery industry,
which is a cause for concern in a community that is traditionally dependent on fishing. Fishing is
conducted with little boats known as sampans by using methods such as gillnetting, trolling, and poleand line fishing. The community relies primarily on local produce such as Gelidium spp. seaweeds,
Eucheuma serra, Grateloupia filicina, and processed fish roe (Chuang, 2015). For tourism andrecreation, Mao’ao, which is part of the Northeast and Yilan Coast National Scenic Area, cooperates
with the New Taipei City government and offers fishing village tours. In these activities, visitors are
introduced to the culture and characteristics of the village and given ecological tours of the intertidal
zone in neighboring Magang fishing community.
Environmental characteristics:
Mao’ao community is home to outstanding fishing grounds exhibiting a rich diversity of marine
species. Notably, small abalones (Holiotis diversicolor) and abalones (Haliotis discus) are cultured here,
allowing the community to promote these products as delicacies and specialties. The New Taipei City
government has not only banned gillnetting within 3 nautical miles of the coast but also established the
New Taipei City Gongliao Fishery Resource Conservation Zone on April 5, 2012, to subject marine
species to management. These species include small abalones, sea urchins, lobsters, Triton’s trumpet
snails, corals, and Gelidium spp. and Eucheuma spp. seaweeds. In addition, the neighboring New Taipei
City Government Marine Restoration Park has begun basic rehabilitation of economic fishery resources,
including breeding and releasing of pharaoh cuttlefish (Sepia pharaonis), small abalones (H.
diversicolor), and abalones (H. discus). Moreover, artificial reefs have been deployed outside theperimeter of Mao’ao Bay, further expanding favorable conditions for rich marine life. The Fishery
Agency is the national government body in charge of Taiwan’s fisheries management and affiliatedwith the Council of Agriculture. In 2015, it launched a community-based sea farming projectcomprising various measures for promoting sustainable fishery, including preplanning, stockenhancement, and community-based co-management. Mao’ao Bay was designated Taiwan’s first sea
farming demonstration zone (Chen et al., 2020) (Figure 2).

Figure 1. The aerial view of Mao'ao community.

Figure 2. The vision map of Mao'ao community.

Dong’ao community (Yilan county):
Socioeconomic characteristics:
Dong’ao community is located in Dong’ao Bay, which is home to Fenniaolin fishing harbor (Figure3). Marine fishery is a principal source of income for the local people and is performed in various
manners, including as set-net fishery, which is a type of relatively eco-friendly and passive fishing.
Additional small-scale fishing includes gillnetting and pole and line fishing as well as recreational
fishing. The main catch comprises approximately 50 species in this harbor, including oriental bonito,
mackerel, skipjack tuna, and Japanese horse mackerel.
The community currently comprises 140 households with a total population of 368 people (thepermanent population comprises approximately 190 people). The three main facilities for spiritual
practice are Chao-an shrine as well as Fu-de and Ching-an temples, with Chao-an shrine serving as themain meeting place. The main problems facing the community are the same as those of Mao’ao:
persistent out-migration of young adults and an increasingly aging population in the fishery industry.
The community regards the development of recreational activities as the primary task for achieving
empowerment and development. However, because of a lack of human resources, local organizational
capabilities are limited for community development.
Close to Dong’ao lies Dong-yue indigenous community, the two communities comprise the school
district for Dong’ao elementary school. The school plays a key role in promoting local environmental
education and connecting the two communities. Dong-yue’s food culture is noteworthy for its
emphasis of flying fish. The flying fish are purchased from local fishers who practice set-net fishery.
The annual processing and drying of flying fish between April 20 and June 20 is an important culturalactivity that embodies distinct ecological and cultural values.
Environmental characteristics:
Dong'ao Bay is a natural and semi-enclosed bay located at the edge of the East Asian continental
shelf where the warm Kuroshio current persistently flows along Taiwan’s coast throughout the year.
The Kuroshio current in combination with other geographical features along the east coast of Taiwan
provides abundant fishery resources. Dong’ao Bay is composed of a rocky reef and a sandy beach. The
number of species and the population density of some species in this bay are high. In addition, artificial
underwater reefs have restored marine resources. Three marine protected areas (Dong’ao Fish Farming
Closed Fishing Area, Dong’ao Artificial Reef Closed Fishing Area, and Protected Reef Closed Fishing
Areas) in Dong’ao Bay facilitate restoration by providing intermediate breeding space for marine
animals. Since 2018, Dong’ao Bay is also a sea farming zone bringing additional advantages to thecommunity. In addition to various policy-based interventions, since 2018, local people conduct patrols
to monitor the local marine resources.

Figure 3. The aerial view of Dong'ao community.

Figure 4. The vision map of Dong'ao community.

Description of human-nature interactions in the area (land-use, traditional resource management
practices etc.)
Fishery is a traditional activity at the two study sites. In addition to set-net fishery in Dong’ao, bothsites exhibit small-scale fishery such as pole and line fishing, gillnetting, and harvesting fishery (e.g.,Ama, あま). Several regulatory mechanisms for resource management exist, including marine protectedareas, MPAs, fishing limits, size restrictions, and closures. However, both Mao’ao and Dong’ao face apersistent out-migration of young adults, an increasingly aging population in the fishery industry, anda shortage of employment opportunities. Therefore, the government implemented a project aiming atconserving fishery resources and improving both productivity and industrial development since 2015.
In the meantime, both communities have begun to introduce touristic activities such as kayaking andrecreational fishing and develop facilities such as restaurants and accommodation (e.g., bed andbreakfast). In addition, after introducing the satoumi concept, the local people began developing
community tours to link social (human life and culture) and ecological (ecosystem services andlandscapes/ seascapes) resources and create more diverse livelihood. Figure 4 shows the vision map of
Dong'ao community.

Contents
Note: The following fields are used for information about activities described in the case study or the production of the case study
itself, and contents may vary depending on the nature of the case study. For example, a case study about on-the-ground activities
may include the rationale, objectives etc. for the activities; a case study about a SEPLS-related policy may describe the policymaking
process; or a case study describing a SEPLS may address particular practices used there. Please make an effort to fill as many fields
as possible.

Status (“ongoing” or “completed”)

ongoing

Period (MM/YY to MM/YY)

01/2019 to 12/2021

Rationale (why activities or policies described, or information shared in the case study are needed)

Since 2011, the Forestry Bureau of the Council of Agriculture has been working with public
sectors, universities, nonprofit organizations, and local communities on ecological restoration of critical
habitats and ecosystem services in low-elevation mountainous ecosystems (e.g., rice terraces andwetlands) based on the Satoyama Initiative. However, concerning the governance of ecosystem servicesof river basins and the integrity and connection among forests, rivers, human settlements, and seas innatural and rural areas of Taiwan, integrated approaches to conservation, revitalization, andsustainability are critical. Therefore, the roles and functions of rural areas in Taiwan, especially incoastal areas, must be re-examined. Because the fishing industry was traditionally based in harbors,
fishing settlements gradually expanded to the surrounding areas. This resulted in clusters of fishingcommunities with well-established roots, which are typical for Taiwan’s coastal regions. Coastal fishery
is a major source of income and livelihood for local communities along the coast, and local people must
consider how to respond to current developmental trends centered on resource conservation
management and the integration of local industrial development. Since 2019, the Fisheries ResearchInstitute (the FRI) has been involved in the policy program “Establishment of a National EcologicalConservation Green Network” (promoted by the Council of Agriculture), which aids the developmentof satoumi and enhances the sustainability of fishing villages.
Objectives (goals of activities or policies described, or of producing the case study)

The FRI has accumulated long-term experience in research and development for fisheries and has
expertise and human resources for practical consultation. In recent years, the FRI’s researchers
cooperate in the aforementioned policy program and are engaged in building partnerships with otherorganizations. In the meantime, researchers have begun promoting the concept of satoumi development.
FRI’s participation bridged the gap in resource inventory and practical consultation in coastal fishingcommunities. The FRI introduced participatory methods for interacting with local communities. The
promotion of satoumi areas relies not only on official funds and policy support but also entails theconsideration of local characteristics and the demands of residents. This strengthens the cooperation
with and partnership of fishers’ associations, fishing communities, and other organizations in the area.
Additional tasks are enhancing local communities’ capacity for environmental education andstrengthening community resilience as well as protecting local traditional cultures. The central tenet ofsatoumi is the synergetic coexistence of humans and nature within the areas of coastal ecosystems. In
the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the FRI emphasizes SDG 14 (importance oflife below water), SDG 8 (economic growth), SDG 12 (responsible production), and SDG 11(sustainable communities and society). Concerning these goals, the environmental, social, andeconomic aspects in the coastal communities can be integrated. Overall, the objectives of this project
include: (1) to foster integration of communities and ecosystems to achieve a harmonious situation
within specific socio-ecological systems in downstream and coastal areas; (2) to create social capitaland facilitate sustainable development in the fishing villages.
Activities and/or practices employed

The FRI has cooperated with several governmental and non-governmental organizations to
implement the aforementioned policy program. We have cooperated with National Cheng Kung
University and National Taiwan Ocean University to conduct investigations and field surveys in Mao’ao
and Dong’ao communities. Through conducting workshops, we identified pertinent concerns andfacilitated a process of consensus-finding. Subsequently, we introduced external resources such as the“Taiwan Association for Marine Environment and Education” and a social enterprise called “Small
Community, Big Issue” to cooperate in promoting satoumi education and fishery citizen science (Figure5). Furthermore, after analyzing the findings obtained through the aforementioned activities, we
compiled lesson plans on satoumi education to be used as examples in potential satoumi areas.

Figure 5. Diverse satoumi lesson plans comprising environmental educations and citizen science were
designed for the communities

The FRI is recognized as a major supplier of technology and knowledge concerning fishery. Now,
it aims to promote the concept of satoumi among coastal fishing communities and encourageconservation and development. Our roadmap for developing satoumi comprises three stages, each with
distinct actions (Figure 6):

Stage 1: Planning and call to action
1. Develop the “Indicators of Socioecological Systems in Taiwan’s Coastal Fishing Communities” ;2. Evaluate the current status and potential of 28 communities relevant to satoumi and assess thesocial-ecological production landscape and seascapes (SEPLS) nearby those coastal communities;
3. Conduct “Satoumi Workshops for Sustainable Development” and the “Taiwan Satoumi Areas andSocioecological Sustainability Forum” to elicit the diverse voices of local people and share
relevant practical experience;
4. Evaluate and designate key satoumi areas for implementing a participatory action approach.
Stage 2: On-site practical implementation
1. Conduct focus-group meetings to open up multiple communication channels and discuss thedevelopment strategies for key satoumi areas;
2. Apply practical consultation to key satoumi areas to enable satoumi-related industrial value-added
activities;
3. Empower local people in key satoumi areas and implement environmental education and citizen
science to raise awareness of marine environmental conditions and encourage taking action.
Stage 3: Extension and outreach to the public
1. Create a “Satoumi Information Platform” for broader dissemination of the satoumi concept andrelevant case studies;
2. Nurture relevant talent, recruit teams to promote satoumi education, and build a human-resources
database;
3. Assist the communities in satoumi areas to implement satoumi environmental education and use
relevant teaching aids;
4. Encourage exchange and visitations among communities in satoumi areas to facilitate the sharingof experience to accumulated social capital;
5. Expand local participation in satoumi to nationwide public participation.

Figure 6. Three stages of developing satoumi and the activities for each stage
Results

Stage 1 (2019):
To develop satoumi areas in Taiwan, defining satoumi at the initial stage is paramount. Therefore,
we established the indicators for evaluating satoumi areas according to international researches(Duraiappah & Nakamura, 2013; IPSI Secretariat, 2015; Japan Satoyama Satoumi Assessment, 2010;
Tsukamoto et al., 2008) and “The Guidebook for Creating Satoumi (里海づくりの手引書)” (Ministryof the Environment, 2011). Subsequently, field surveys and workshops were implemented at 28
potential satoumi areas across Taiwan (Figure 7).

Figure 7. Locations of 28 potential satoumi areas in Taiwan

We identified problems and analyzed the socioecological status of each potential area byinteracting with and understanding the local stakeholders and incorporating the information obtained
from the field survey. Eventually, the potential areas were chosen as Taiwan’s satoumi demonstrationsites. Furthermore, we collected more crucial opinions and suggestions from experts and participants
through conducting the “Taiwan Satoumi Areas and Socioecological Sustainability Forum” (Figure 8).
The obtained findings became the foundations for the future development and realization of the satoumi
initiative in Taiwan.

Figure 8. Forum and focus group meeting for discussing the development of satoumi in Taiwan
The photo on the left shows the participants of the “Forum of Satoumi Areas and Socioecological
Sustainability in Taiwan” conducted by the FRI in October, 2019. Participants represented government,
industry, NGOs, and communities with an interest in the topic. The photo on the right shows theparticipants of the focus group meeting of experts discussing the concept of satoumi and its suitability
in the context of Taiwan.

Stage 2 (2020):
The second stage began in 2020 with practical consultation in the field. Our main activity
comprised the following processes:
1. Knowledge facilitation
Practical consultation through preliminary interviews and three focus group meetings at each site
was conducted to understand the needs and current situation of the community, and expert
meetings were conducted to determine the strategies of satoumi development.
2. Capacity building
After understanding and evaluating local social and ecological resources, we planned andorganized satoumi environmental education courses for the satoumi demonstration areas such as
guide training, water quality assessment, and participatory intertidal ecological surveys.
3. On-site practical implementation

In 2020, follow-up activities were conducted. These included training courses enabling locals to
conduct participatory intertidal ecological surveys, establish a fish-catch reporting system, anddevelop satoumi-related industries.
By implementing community empowerment and providing satoumi environmental education
courses, we expect to produce fishery production and resource-related data enabling long-term
investigation and fishery monitoring (Figure 9 & Table. 1).

Figure 9. An example of catch composition of set-net fishery recorded by local people in Dong’ao
community

Table. 1. An example of a daily record of caught species from set-net fishery in Dong’ao Bay
On October 24, 2020, the FRI conducted an inaugural event in Dong’ao community. Local
residents, fishers, representatives from the leisure industry and schools as well as other stakeholders

joined a program that included a beach cleanup activity, bamboo raft launching ceremony, guidance
and interpretation concerning set-net fishing and fish species, storytelling about the fishingcommunity’s history, and a fish auction. On November 9, a satoumi environmental education activity
was conducted in Mao’ao community in cooperation with the Taiwan Association for Marine
Environment and Education and the local elementary school. The activity included coral assessment
and intertidal zone observation and record-keeping. The community integrated its satoumi
environmental education lesson plan and experience activities into community reception services. This
activity offered a beneficial opportunity for Mao’ao community to develop a model comprising both
environmental education and industrial development.
From the experience in Mao’ao and Dong’ao communities, we believe that local awareness andorganizational capacity are increasing. In addition, local fishing culture and ecosystem services aresupported through the idea of “local production for local consumption.” The ongoing works with thesesatoumi areas and the experience we have obtained constitute a practical methodology for the expansionof satoumi in Taiwan.
Lessons learned (factors in success or failure, challenges, and opportunities)

We found that the autonomous participation of fishers and local people played a crucial role.
Therefore, the promotion of citizen science in fishery and the development of environmental education
were applied to train talents and build capacity in local communities. In addition, community
participation in a fishery co-management model was gradually introduced. To achieve long-termsustainable coexistence in social, economic, and environmental aspects, a diverse and inclusive
communication model should be established at the local level as soon as possible to allow stakeholders
to recognize the value of local traditions, knowledge, and cultures (Figure 10).
Through the experience from studying the satoumi sites, the regional experiences will gradually
be developed into a set of feasible promotion criteria and guidelines and be used as the basis for thenational satoumi education and research network. The development of the satoumi sites with asustainable concept is expected to lead to an opportunity for the revitalization and development ofcoastal fishing communities in Taiwan.

Figure 10 The ‘Ama, あま’ used their traditional knowledge to harvest seaweed in the inter-tidal zone
in northeastern Taiwan
Key messages

To promote the satoumi initiative in Taiwan, the FRI aimed to identify a mutually beneficial
relationship between humans and nature that is not only environmental resources but also encourages
sustainable economic development in coastal areas. At the first stage, in 2019, we identified problems
and analyzed the social-ecological status of 28 potential satoumi areas across Taiwan. In addition, we
conducted forums to discuss the concept of satoumi and its suitability in the context of Taiwan. At thesecond stage, in 2020, we focused on interacting with and understanding the local stakeholders andincorporating the information obtained from the on-site practical implementation at the model sites byconducting field surveys, in-depth interviews, secondary data analysis, focus group meetings, andquestionnaire surveys. Furthermore, practical consultation in the field, satoumi environmental education
courses, and citizen scientist’s empowerment were implemented. Over 70 public–private sector
partnerships and NGOs and over 800 individuals have participated directly or indirectly in the processuntil now. Out study yielded the following outcomes:
1.

By adopting diverse patterns of communication through interviews and focus group meetings
among local stakeholders and holding forum and expert-meetings, we conclude that thesetechniques are helpful for encouraging interaction with stakeholders, finding consensus, andintensifying the partnership of the local and involved organizations. In summary, the applied
techniques are useful for developing strategies for the advancement of satoumi initiatives.

2.

The community empowerment courses included ecological, environmental, and industrial
development. In addition, the content of the courses was based on local awareness and the resultsof conducting local resource inventories. This increased the willingness to participate amongcommunity members.

3.

The introduction of satoumi environmental education and citizen science courses to residents inthe communities increased their awareness of the condition of the marine environment andencouraged them to take precautionary measures.

4.

By providing practical methods for acquiring knowledge concerning marine resources andfishery management, community members are encouraged to continuously promote satoumi.

5.

The satoumi education lesson plans offer an opportunity for fishing communities to promote
their fishing culture, local ecological knowledge, and related ecosystem services.
Based on our promotion and the aforementioned activities, local people are now partly involved insatoumi-related activities. We hope that local people and stakeholders will cooperate with each other in
co-managing coastal ecosystems and their communities in the near future. The ongoing work of the FRI
involves creating a “Satoumi Information Platform” not only for broader dissemination of the satoumi
concept and case studies but also for creating a space for facilitating the cooperation of crossgovernment bodies in promoting satoumi activities in more comprehensive and diverse manners.
Crucially, enhancing human resources, for example, by nurturing young talents and by recruiting a“satoumi extension task force,” and drawing public attention to coastal areas are two pivotal tasks.
Finally, the blueprint of practical methodology for the advancement of satoumi adopted by the FRI will
be widely extended to other fishing communities and coastal ecosystems.
Relationship to other IPSI activities (if the case study is related to any other IPSI collaborative activities, case studies, etc.)

The FRI maintains a partnership between Taiwanese IPSI members such as National Dong-Hwa
University, Hualien District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, and the Forestry Bureau.
These IPSI partners focus mainly on SEPLS in agriculture and forested areas such as forests andfarmlands. In addition, the FRI focuses on ocean-based activities and livelihoods that are both affectedby and affect complex interactions among ecological, social, and economic systems in coastal zones.
The interactions between the FRI and Taiwanese IPSI members involve exchanging opinions andexperience concerning satoyama advancement and assisting in the governance in satoumi areas. Now,
the FRI is promoting the concept of satoumi to coastal fishing communities and trying to improveconservation and the development of fishing communities and their environments.
Funding (any relevant information about funding of activities or projects described in the case study)

For this case study, the funding for promoting satoumi was provided by government bodies(Establishment of a National Ecological Conservation Green Network). All individuals involved in thiswork are from the government, industry, academia, and NGOs, and the communities in the satoumi
areas.
Reference

Chen, J. L., Hsu, K., Chuang, C. T. (2020). How do fishery resources enhance the development ofcoastal fishing communities: Lessons learned from a community-based sea farming project in
Taiwan. Ocean & Coastal Management, 184, 105015.
Chuang, C.T., 2015. Socio-Economic Investigation and Operation Management Framework
Arrangement for Fish Farming Demonstration Zone in Taiwan. Project Report of Fisheries Agency(Abstract in English).
Duraiappah, A. K., & Nakamura, K. (2013). The Japan Satoyama Satoumi Assessment: objectives,
focus and approach. Satoyama-Satoumi Ecosystems Human Well-Being, 1-16.
IPSI Secretariat (2015). IPSI Handbook: The International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI)
Charter, Operational Guidelines, Strategy, Plan of Action 2013-2018.
Japan Satoyama Satoumi Assessment (2010). Satoyama-Satoumi Ecosystems and Human Well-being:
Socio-ecological Production Landscapes of Japan - Summary for Decision Makers. United Nations
University, Tokyo, Japan.
Liu, H.H., Chuang, C.T., Chiu, S.T. (2001). An Application of Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Method
in Evaluating the Performance of Flourishing Fishing Community Development and Planning.
Taiwan. Agric. Econ. Rev. 7 (1), 63–99 (abstract in English).
Ministry of the Environment (2011). The Guidebook for Creating Satoumi (里海づくりの 手引書),
109.

Retrievedfrom:https://www.env.go.jp/water/heisa/satoumi/common/satoumi_manual_all.pdf
Wang, S. B., Chen, W. K., & Joung, S. J. (2013). Seasonal dynamics of flatfish assemblage in coastal
waters off northeastern Taiwan: With implications for shift in species dominance of the ecosystem.
Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 21, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.6119/JMST-013-12194.
Tsukamoto, K., Kawamura, T., Takeuchi, T., Beard Jr, T. D., & Kaiser, M. J. (2008). “Sato-Umi”—A
New Concept for Sustainable Fisheries. Fisheries for Global Welfare and Environment, 351.

Contributions to Global Agendas
CBD Aichi Biodiversity Targets (https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/)
Please place an “x” in the “direct” or “indirect” boxes next to any of the CBD’s Aichi Biodiversity Targets to which the work
described in this case study contributes as appropriate. Note: please mark only those that the case actually has made or is making acontribution, not those to which it could make a potential contribution in the future.
TargetDescription

DirectIndirectBy 2020, at the latest, people are aware of the values of biodiversity and the steps they can take toconserve and use it sustainably.

X

By 2020, at the latest, biodiversity values have been integrated into national and local development

Xand poverty reduction strategies and planning processes and are being incorporated into national
accounting, as appropriate, and reporting systems.
By 2020, at the latest, incentives, including subsidies, harmful to biodiversity are eliminated,phased out or reformed in order to minimize or avoid negative impacts, and positive incentives forX

the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity are developed and applied, consistent and inharmony with the Convention and other relevant international obligations, taking into accountnational socio economic conditions.
By 2020, at the latest, Governments, business and stakeholders at all levels have taken steps toachieve or have implemented plans for sustainable production and consumption and have kept theX

impacts of use of natural resources well within safe ecological limits.
By 2020, the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, is at least halved and whereX

feasible brought close to zero, and degradation and fragmentation is significantly reduced.

By 2020 all fish and invertebrate stocks and aquatic plants are managed and harvested sustainably,
legally and applying ecosystem based approaches, so that overfishing is avoided, recovery plansXand measures are in place for all depleted species, fisheries have no significant adverse impacts on
threatened species and vulnerable ecosystems and the impacts of fisheries on stocks, species andecosystems are within safe ecological limits.
By 2020 areas under agriculture, aquaculture and forestry are managed sustainably, ensuringconservation of biodiversity.

X

By 2020, pollution, including from excess nutrients, has been brought to levels that are not
detrimental to ecosystem function and biodiversity.

X

By 2020, invasive alien species and pathways are identified and prioritized, priority species arecontrolled or eradicated, and measures are in place to manage pathways to prevent theirX

introduction and establishment.
By 2015, the multiple anthropogenic pressures on coral reefs, and other vulnerable ecosystems
impacted by climate change or ocean acidification are minimized, so as to maintain their integrity
and functioning.

XBy 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water, and 10 per cent of coastal and marine
areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, areconserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and wellX

connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, andintegrated into the wider landscapes and seascapes.
By 2020 the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservationXstatus, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained.

By 2020, the genetic diversity of cultivated plants and farmed and domesticated animals and ofwild relatives, including other socio-economically as well as culturally valuable species, ismaintained, and strategies have been developed and implemented for minimizing genetic erosionXand safeguarding their genetic diversity.
By 2020, ecosystems that provide essential services, including services related to water, andcontribute to health, livelihoods and well-being, are restored and safeguarded, taking into accountX

the needs of women, indigenous and local communities, and the poor and vulnerable.
By 2020, ecosystem resilience and the contribution of biodiversity to carbon stocks has beenenhanced, through conservation and restoration, including restoration of at least 15 per cent ofX

degraded ecosystems, thereby contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation and tocombating desertification.
By 2015, the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing

Xof Benefits Arising from their Utilization is in force and operational, consistent with national
legislation.
By 2015 each Party has developed, adopted as a policy instrument, and has commenced
implementing an effective, participatory and updated national biodiversity strategy and action plan.

X

By 2020, the traditional knowledge, innovations and practices of indigenous and local
communities relevant for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and their customary
use of biological resources, are respected, subject to national legislation and relevant internationalX

obligations, and fully integrated and reflected in the implementation of the Convention with thefull and effective participation of indigenous and local communities, at all relevant levels.
By 2020, knowledge, the science base and technologies relating to biodiversity, its values,
functioning, status and trends, and the consequences of its loss, are improved, widely shared andXtransferred, and applied.
By 2020, at the latest, the mobilization of financial resources for effectively implementing theStrategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 from all sources, and in accordance with theconsolidated and agreed process in the Strategy for Resource Mobilization, should increase
substantially from the current levels. This target will be subject to changes contingent to resource
needs assessments to be developed and reported by Parties.

XUN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs)
Please place an “x” in the “direct” or “indirect” boxes next to any of the UN Sustainable Development Goals to which the work
described in this case study contributes as appropriate. Note: please mark only those that the case actually has made or is making acontribution, not those to which it could make a potential contribution in the future.
SDG

Description

DirectIndirect

End poverty in all its forms everywhereX

End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainableagriculture

X

Ensure healthy lives and promote wellbeing for all at all ages
X

Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning
opportunities for all

X

Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
X

Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
X/

Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for allX

Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive
employment, and decent work for all

X

Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialisation, andfoster innovation

X

Reduce inequality within and among countries
X

Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
X

Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
X

Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts
X

Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable
development

XProtect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably
manage forests, combat desertification and halt and reverse land degradation, and haltX

biodiversity loss
Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide accessto justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels

X

Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalise the global partnership forsustainable development

XAuthors’ profile
Dr. Chen is a cross-discipline marine social scientists in
Fisheries Research Institute, Taiwan, ROC. He received
Ph.D. degree from National Taiwan Ocean University. His
expertise includes economic analysis and management formarine ecosystem services, fishermen’s behavior for marine
resources management, coastal resources co-management
and sustainable uses.

Dr. Jyun-Long Chen
(Associate Researcher in FRI)
Mr. Hsu is a Research Assistant in Marine Fisheries
Division, Fisheries Research Institute, Taiwan, ROC, andalso a doctoral student in Department of Bio-industry
Communication and Development, National Taiwan
University. His research interests focus on social-ecologicalsystem in coastal areas, stakeholder analysis for issues in theuse of marine resources, and development of fishing villages.

Mr. Kang Hsu(Research Assistant in FRI)