Research Report
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DISASTER MANAGEMENT OF BANGLADESH AND JAPANESPECIALLY IN THE AREAS OF FLOOD, CYCLONE AND EARTHQUAKEAND TECHNIQUES OF COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION TO CREATE AWARNESSTHROUGH DISASTER EDUCATION IN JAPAN:
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION INBANGLADESH

9 May 2011
Kobe, Japan

Final Report for the Visiting Researcher
Program in 2010(B)Prepared By

Mohiuddin Ahmed Khan
Deputy Secretary
Disaster Management and Relief Division
Bangladesh
Visiting Researcher (ADRC)
January – May 2011 Term

Content
1. Introduction
2. Specific Aims of Research
3. Proposed Research Activities
4. Asian Disaster Reduction Center
5. Visiting Research Program
6. Geographical information of Bangladesh
7. Natural Hazards in Bangladesh
8. Floods
9. Regulative Framework in Bangladesh
10. Disaster Management in Japan
11. Disaster Management Plan in Japan
12. Basic Legal Frameworks of Disaster Management in Japan
13. Disaster Management related Budget in Japan
14. The Great Tohoku Pacific Ocean Earthquake
15. Disaster Scenario in ADRC Member Countries and Recovery initiatives
16. Community Development
17. Community Mobilization in Bangladesh
18. The Kobe Earthquake (The Great Hansin Awaji Earthquake) and Community
Participation
19. Lessons Learned from the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake
20. Role of Tokyo Fire Service in Community Mobilization
21. Inamura no Hi and Community Involvement of Villagers
22. Comparative Analysis of Disaster Management System in Japan and Bangladesh
23. Community and Local Involvement
24. Community Based Disaster Management
25. Some Case studies on Community Participation
26. Lessons learned from Japan
27. Recommendations for Community Mobilization in Bangladesh
28. Conclusion

Foreword- Messages to Visiting Researchers Dear Visiting Researchers,
As noted everywhere, there is new and arresting evidence
on how and why disaster risk is increasing globally. Increasing
urbanization, vulnerable rural livelihoods, and the decline of
ecosystems are among the key “risk drivers” according to the2009 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction by
the United Nations.
About 40% of all natural disasters occur in Asia, but theseaccount for more than 80% of the number of casualties attributed
to natural disasters. Indeed, disaster risk is extremely high in Asia as compared to otherregions. A series of catastrophes recently occurred in China, Indonesia, Vietnam orelsewhere again reminded us of the great importance of disaster risk reduction.
The Asian Disaster Reduction Center (ADRC), since its inception in 1998, hascommitted itself to promoting multilateral cooperation on disaster risk reduction in close
cooperation with its twenty-nine member countries. In so doing, the ADRC is engaged ina wide range of activities, such as promoting dissemination and sharing of disaster-related
knowledge. The ADRC also cooperates with its member countries in strengthening theircapacity to cope with natural disasters at various levels of government. As one of suchendeavours, we are very pleased to have welcomed Visiting Researchers from member
countries again this year.
During their stay at the ADRC, the Visiting Researchers have visited many
institutions, government and non-government alike. They have learned new knowledge
and ideas through lectures and seminars and, most importantly, met many first-classprofessionals in Japan. I would like to take this opportunity to express my great
appreciation to those who have spent their precious time and resources for our Visiting
Researchers.
I congratulate the successful completion of the ADRC Visiting Researcher
Program and hope that they will go back to their home countries safe and will maintain
good collaboration with the ADRC in the future.

Atsushi KORESAWA
Executive Director
Asian Disaster Reduction CenterAcknowledgement

I have been serving as Deputy Secretary, Disaster Management and relief Division of Bangladesh. First of
all I would like to express my gratitude to ADRC for selecting me in this program to represent
Bangladesh as Visiting Researcher. I would like to pay my sincere gratitude to Honorable Minister for
Food and Disaster of Bangladesh, Dr. Mohammed Abdur Razzak, Secretary in charge, Disaster
Management and Relief Division, Dr. M. Aslam Alam and Secretary, Ministry of Establishment Iqbal
Mahmud to give me this opportunity to serve my country. I would like to thank all the staff members of
the ADRC for providing me kind cooperation to conduct the successful research program. I would like tothank Mr. A. Koresawa (Executive Director – ADRC) who guided me with his valuable wisdom,knowledge and experience on disaster management. It would be my great pleasure and happiness toextend my sincere gratitude and respect to Ms. Miki Kodama, Senior Researcher, ADRC who always
guided me on research issues and given solutions to my problems instantly.

I am ever grateful to Mr. Fujieda, Senior Researcher- ADRC who mentored and supervised me in overall
to achieve my target and also Ms. Tae Watanabe (Administrative Manager) guided with theadministrative matters and gave me a proper way to overcome all the administrative matters. Also, I must
extend my heartiest thanks to administrative staff members of ADRC and Japanese Teacher Mr. Shoji
Kawahara, for their valuable information and prudent suggestions and evergreen energies spent for me inmany ways during my stay in Japan. I would never hesitate to thank my other VR members in Asia
especially Ms. Maiya Kadel (Nepal), who supported me to create better group activities throughout mystay in Japan.

Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to the Government of Japan, ADRC both its management
and fellow researchers for their whole hearted support and cooperation that has been extended to me tomake my stay comfortable and also to the Government of Bangladesh for allowing me to be benefited
from practical experience in Japan. I would also like to extend my thanks to JICA, Hyogo, for offeringsome valuable session on comprehensive Disaster Management.

Abstract

Disaster risk is on the rise throughout the world. The economic losses and the number of people who havebeen affected by natural disasters have increased dramatically over the past decades than both economic
and population growth. This will slower the economic growth of the affected country. The physical, socialand economic losses caused by these disasters are particularly more expensive for developing countries.
To minimize the damages caused by disasters, various efforts have been taken by government,international community including donor agencies.

Despite highest disaster preparedness by Japanese Government, this year, on March 11, northeastern partof Japan has been severely devastated by magnitude 9 earthquake followed by tsunami (called Tohoku
Earthquake) which killed 25,000 people, 50,000 people missing and made 250000 people homeless andpreliminary loss of lives and properties worth of $310 billion dollars. The severity of the disaster was
beyond imagination which caused such big damage of valuable lives and properties. For this reason,community should be more conscious about disaster prevention culture and mitigation. They should be
involved in post disaster recovery and reconstruction process for facing the future disasters and mitigate it.

Japan Government’s initiative and commitment to mobilize local and international community tominimize the damage and loss from Disaster is highly commendable. Japanese experience of disastermanagement and mitigation and community involvement in the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake had
been proven most successful. Bangladesh is a disaster prone country. Japanese lessons can be replicatedto Bangladesh to involve community more extensively to mitigate disaster. In this paper I examined the
major disaster phenomenon in Japan and Bangladesh, a comparative study of disaster management system
of Japan and Bangladesh, techniques of community mobilization in Japan for successful implementationof disaster preparedness planning and recovery from post disaster situations. I would like to replicate
some experience, I gained from Japan to my country and recommend some suggestions on effective
community mobilization in Bangladesh.

1. INTRODUCTION:
Disaster reduction and sustainable development are necessary preconditions for a country’s economic
development and overall prosperity. Natural disasters have been severely affecting the progress and goalsof sustainable development. From the perspectives of Climate change, environmental degradation, humanintervention, and security aspects, disaster management is a sensitive issue for all of us andcomprehensive disaster management package should be undertaken. The comprehensive disastermanagement approach seeks stakeholders or communities at risk get engaged in all of its phases:
prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery. In every disasters, community has to comeforward first to rescue victims from collapsing houses or from under the debris. Every year there is a greatloss of people’s lives and property in Japan due to natural disasters. Up until the1950s, numerous largescale typhoons and earthquakes caused extensive damage and thousands of casualties. However, with theprogress of society’s capabilities to address disasters and the mitigation of vulnerabilities to disasters bydeveloping disaster management systems, modern technologies and involvement of community indisaster preparedness, post disaster recovery and decision making process has been proved most effective
to minimize the loss of lives and properties in Japan.

Bangladesh is also vulnerable to disasters. Floods are recurring phenomenon in Bangladesh. Generally
each year 18.02% area is flooded. Catastrophic Cyclone SIDR in 2007 and AILA in 2008 had severely
damaged human life, property and infrastructures in six coastal districts of Bangladesh. Earthquake,tsunami and landslides are also sensitive disaster issues in Bangladesh. In order to build disaster-resilient
communities, they first need to be empowered so that community members can cope with the adverse
effects of natural hazards. This is the most effective approach to attain sustainable disaster management
policy in dealing with natural disaster risks. ADRC has been executing various community-based
programs to establish disaster prevention as an integral and essential component of sustainable
development. Its activities include improvement of the safety levels of core community facilities such as
schools; the dissemination of best practices in disaster risk management at the community level; and theformulation of integrated programs for sustainable development through disaster risk management
initiatives. The paper presents Comparative analysis and some findings of community mobilization to
Japan and Bangladesh which engage communities to deal with disaster effectively. My research plan in
ADRC is to conduct a Comparative study on the community mobilization to reduce the risk of predisaster, during and post disaster situations in Bangladesh and community mobilization in Japan to tackle
disaster. More specifically I conducted a comparative study on planning community mobilization fordisaster prevention and preparedness, disaster emergency measures, disaster recovery and rehabilitation in
Japan and Bangladesh. In case of any disaster local people or community has to response first.

2. SPECIFIC AIMS OF RESEARCH:
This research plan promotes the design of risk reduction strategies Disaster Education, Learning and
Simulation and Community Based Adaptation Programs as an outcome of the risk reduction andassessment process. This ensures Prevention, Preparedness, Response and Recovery programs are multihazard focused and that the move from being hazard generic in nature to risk specific. This will enablecommunities to better understand their changing risk environment and thus become more resilient throughproactive risk reduction efforts

Gather knowledge and skills from the disaster management system in Japan especially thetechniques of community mobilization in Japan.



Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction;

Strengthening of community institutional mechanisms;

Empowering community at risk particularly women, the poor and the disadvantaged;



Expanding risk reduction programming across a broader range of hazards (all hazards approach);Strengthening emergency response systems; andDeveloping and strengthening networks of relevant national, regional

3. PROPOSED RESEARCH ACTIVITIES:Classification of disasters such as flood cyclone, earthquake, landslide etc.

Study the community participation during disaster in Japan and Bangladesh.



Choose appropriate technique to involve the community to reduce the risk of disaster andresponse and recovery from disaster in Bangladesh.



Learn basic ideas for preparing community through learning and training and drill in Japan.

Conduct preliminary study to educational institutions and disaster related Government offices toknow how they impart training to the schools and colleges and office staffs in Japan.

Conduct Case studies on the behavior of the community in response to disaster in Japan.

Conduct study to adaptation in disaster situations and post disaster rehabilitation.

4. ASIAN DISASTER REDUCTION CENTER
Type: International Organization
Objectives: To facilitate multinational cooperation for disaster reduction in the Asian region
Establishment: July 1998
Location: Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
Member: 29 member countries, 5 advisor countries, one observerOperation: ADRC is operated based on stipulation adopted
The Asian Disaster Reduction Center was established in Kobe, Hyogo prefecture, in 1998, with mission
to enhance disaster resilience of the member countries, to build safe communities, and to create a society
where sustainable development is possible. The Center works to build disaster resilient communities andto establish networks among countries through many programs including personnel exchanges in thisfield.
MissionTo Enhance Disaster Resilience of the Member Countries.
To Build Safe Communities.
To Create a Society Where Sustainable Development is Possible.

5. VISITING RESEARCH PROGRAM
Objectives：(1) To learn the Disaster Management in Japan and other countries(2) To enhance human network among Asian Countries
Two terms are conducted in the program, Outline The first term (January-June) and the second term
(July-December) 4 Officers in charge of Disaster Management from member countries.

6. GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION OF BANGLADESH
Bangladesh is a low-lying, riparian country located in South Asia with a largely marshy jungle coastlineof 710 kilometers (440 mi.) on the northern littoral of the Bay of Bengal. Formed by a deltaic plain at theconfluence of the Ganges (Padma), Brahmaputra (Jamuna), and Meghna Rivers and their tributaries,
Bangladesh's alluvial soil is highly fertile but vulnerable to flood and drought. Hills rise above the plain
only in the Chittagong Hill Tracts in the far southeast and the Sylhet division in the northeast. Straddling
the Tropic of Cancer, Bangladesh has a subtropical monsoonal climate characterized by heavy seasonalrainfall, moderately warm temperatures, and high humidity. Natural calamities, such as floods, tropical
cyclones, tornadoes, and tidal bores affect the country almost every year. Bangladesh also is affected bymajor cyclones on average 16 times a decade.

The areas around Dhaka and Comilla are the most densely settled. The Sundarbans, an area of coastal
tropical jungle in the southwest and last wild home of the Bengal tiger, and the Chittagong Hill Tracts on
the southeastern border with Burma and India, are the least densely populated.

LOCATION OF BANGLADESH

7. NATURAL HAZARDS IN BANGLADESHa) Natural Hazards Likely to Affect the Country:

Historical statistics would suggest that Bangladesh is one of the most disaster prone countries in the world
with great negative consequences being associated with various natural and human induced hazards. The
geophysical location, land characteristics, multiplicity of rivers and the monsoon climate render
Bangladesh highly vulnerable to natural hazards. The coastal morphology of Bangladesh influences theimpact of natural hazards on the area. Especially in the south eastern area, natural hazards increase thevulnerability of the coastal dwellers.

b) Disasters and Bangladesh• Flood• Tropical Cyclone• Storm Surge• Tornado• River Bank Erosion• Drought• Earthquake• Arsenic• FireS our ce : ISDR websi teNatural and human induced hazards such as floods, cyclones, droughts, storm surges, tornadoes,
earthquakes, riverbank erosion, fire, infrastructure collapse, the high arsenic contents of ground water,water logging, water and soil salinity, epidemic, and various forms of pollution are frequent occurrences.
Over the years, Bangladesh has developed an elaborate system of disaster management. However, in thepast, the focus of disaster management had been relief and rehabilitation.

c) Key factors of vulnerability• Geographical location• Dominance of flood plains• Low elevation from the sea• Global warming & climate change• High population density• High level of poverty

Bangladesh is vulnerable to a number of disasters including floods, cyclones, riverbank erosion tornados
and droughts. Floods and cyclones are regular visitors to the country. Since the current floods have caused
huge loss of lives and severe damage to crops and properties, (79% people Affected by flood) they
deserve special attention and discussion.

8. FLOODS
Bangladesh is the largest delta in the world, created by three mighty rivers-the Ganges (Padma), theBrahmaputra (Jamuna) and the Meghna. It is criss-crossed by over 230 rivers and rivulets. These river
systems drain the run-offs from a catchment area of about 1.7 million km2, 92.5 per cent of which islocated outside the country. The estimated volume of water flowing through these rivers is about 1500
billion cubic meter which can form a silt(pooli )of a depth of about 10.25 meters stagnant water, if
accumulated over an area equal to that of Bangladesh.

Floods are a blessing to the farmers in Bangladesh as they bring in billions of tons of silt from theHimalayas, making the land one of the most fertile in the world. It becomes a curse, causing loss of lives
and property, only when it exceeds the normal acceptable limit.

The main cause of severe floods in Bangladesh is the synchronized peak flow of the major rivers, hightide in the Bay of Bengal retarding drainage efficiency, and excessive rainfall, Given the fast rate of
population growth and rapid urbanisation forcing people to live in vulnerable areas and development ofrural road networks without proper consideration of the drainage system, it is only natural that high floods
in Bangladesh will cause severe damage to lives, crops and properties.

a) Types of Flood and Causes
Bangladesh generally experiences four types of flood and these are as follows:
1. Flash flood
2. Rain-fed flood
3. River flood
4. Flood due to cyclonic storm surgesb) Flash Flood
This type of flood is characterized by rapid rise and fall in water levels. The duration of flash floods canvary between a few minutes and a few hours. This type of flood occurs mostly in some of thenorthernmost, north-central, northeastern and southeastern parts of the country. In the northernmost,
north-central and northeastern parts, the land areas of the country are at the foothills whole the hilly
catchments lie in India. If it rains heavily in the Indian parts of the catchments, the run-off quickly
accumulates and flows to Bangladesh. It is very difficult to provide forecasts on flash floods but early
warning with a short lead-time may be provided. Flash floods start in the northeast and north central partsof the country from mid-April i.e. before the onset of the southwesterly monsoon. In the northern andsoutheastern areas, it starts with the onset of the southwesterly monsoon.

c) Rain Fed-Flood
This kind of flood occurs in many parts of the country but is generally seen in the moribund Gangetic
deltas in the southwestern part of the country, where most of the natural drainage systems havedeteriorated due to a fall in the upland inflow in the main river, the Ganges. This kind of flood also occurs
in the flood plains where natural drainage systems have been disturbed either due to human interference
e.g. construction of unplanned rural roads and illegal occupation of river courses etc. or due to gradualdecay of the natural drainage system. When intense rainfall takes place in these areas, the natural drainage
system cannot carry the runoff generated by the storm and causes temporary inundation in many localities.

d) River Flood

The word flood is generally synonymous with river flood, which has been a very common phenomenon in
the country from time immemorial. Normally, 20-25% of the area along a river is inundated during themonsoon season. In case of severe floods 35-70% of the country is inundated extending the areas far

beyond the riverbanks. The four worst floods experienced by the country in the last 16 years were in 1987,
1988, 1998 and 2004. The floods of 1998 were the severest in terms of magnitude and duration.
It was observed that severe floods occurred due to excessive rainfall in the catchments. When water levelsin the three major rivers rise simultaneously and cross the danger marks, severe floods usually occur allover the country. This was observed during the floods occurring in 1987, 1988, 1998 and 2004. Water
levels start crossing the danger marks from mid-July and stay that way till mid-September. The durationof severe floods usually extends from 15 days to 45 days, and the longest one occurred in 1998.

e) Flood Due to Storm Surges

This kind of flood mostly occurs in the coastal areas of Bangladesh over the coastline of about 800 km
along the southern part. The continental shelves in this part of the Bay of Bengal are shallow and extend
to about 20-50 km. Moreover, the coastline in the eastern portion is conical and funnel-like in shape.
Owing to these two factors, storm surges generated due to any cyclonic storm are high compared to thesame kind of storm surge in other parts of the world. In case of super cyclones hitting the Bangladesh
coast, the maximum height of the surges was found to be 10-15 m, and these cause flooding in the entire
coastal belt. The worst kind of such flooding, i.e. on 10 November 1970 and 30 April 1991 caused theloss of 300,000 and 130,000 human lives respectively. Apart from the effect of cyclones, coastal areas arealso subjected to tidal flooding during the months from June to September when the sea is in spate due tothe south-westerly monsoon. The incidence of such flooding is now on the increase.

f)

Urban Flooding

Besides these four types of flood, another kind of flood, i.e. urban flooding, is becoming more prevalent
nowadays. Due to rapid urbanization through filling up of low-lying areas, natural drainage systems inurban areas are being destroyed, and this causes urban flooding. This is most acute in major metropolises,
such as Dhaka, Chittagong, Khulna, Rajshahi and Sylhet. But the phenomenon has also become gradually
noticeable in other towns, e.g. Mymensingh, Jessore, Comilla, Noakhali and Rangpur.
Urban flooding is posing a serious threat to the state of roads and pavements, health and hygiene and theenvironmental conditions of the towns and cities. It is pertinent to note that urban planning must take into
consideration the issues of storm water drainage and filling-up of the low-lying areas in and around thecities and towns.

1

9. REGULATIVE FRAMEWORK IN BANGLADESH
In order to manage the paradigm shift in disaster management, a disaster management regulative
framework is established under which the Bangladesh Disaster Management Framework is implemented,
and in which work of Ministries, Departments, NGOs and civil society are undertaken. The regulative
framework provides the relevant legislative, policy and best practice framework under which the activityof Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Response Management in Bangladesh is managed andimplemented. The framework is comprised of:a) Disaster Management Act (to be enacted)
The Disaster Management Act creates the legislative framework under which disaster risk reduction andemergency response management is undertaken in Bangladesh, and the legal basis in which activities andactions are managed. It also creates mandatory obligations and responsibilities on Ministries, committees
and appointments.

b) National Disaster Management Policy (to be adopted)
The National Disaster Management Policy defines the national policy on disaster risk reduction andemergency response management, and describes the strategic policy framework, and national principles
of disaster management in Bangladesh. It is strategic in nature and describes the broad national objectives,and strategies in disaster management.

Disaster Management Regulative
Framework
DisasterManagement Act

DM Policy

National Plan for DM

Sectoral Policies

Sectoral Plans(DRR Incorporated)(DRR Incorporated)

Local Plans
Hazard Plans

SOD

Guideline
Templates

Programming for Implementation1c) National Plan for Disaster Management
The National Plan for Disaster Management defines in broad outline the systemic and institutional
mechanisms under which disaster risk reduction and emergency response management is undertaken in
Bangladesh. It outlines disaster management vision, strategic goals and conceptual framework. It
establishes disaster management regulative and planning frameworks, and identifies priority areas fordisaster risk reduction and emergency response managementd) Standing Orders on Disaster (SOD)The Standing Orders on Disaster outlines the disaster management arrangements in Bangladesh anddescribes the detailed roles and responsibilities of committees, Ministries, Departments and otherorganizations involved in disaster risk reduction and emergency response management, and establishes
the necessary actions required in implementing Bangladesh’s Disaster Management Model, e.g., defining
the risk environment, managing the risk environment, and responding to the threat environment.

Coordinated Response to
Disaster Emergency

COORDINATION

BILATERALDONORS

Disaster Management
Committees

Humanitarian
Actors

DMC / DRR
-National Level-District Level-Municipal Level-Upazila Level-Union Level

NGOs

1

e) National Disaster Context• Frequently hit by various natural disasters like Cyclones, Storm surges, Floods, Tornadoes, Droughts andother calamities.
• Monsoon flooding is an annual occurrence shaping lives and livelihoods.
• Almost 200 disaster events have occurred causing more than 500,000 deaths and leaving prolonged
damage to livelihoods, infrastructure and the economy.
• Climate change is likely to cause significant impact in the form of severe floods, cyclones, droughts,
sea level rise and salinity affecting agriculture, livelihoods, natural orders, water supply, health etc.
• The disaster vulnerable people demonstrate strong coping capacity to face the disaster challenges.

f) Government of Bangladesh’s Vision DM
To reduce the vulnerability of people, especially the poor, to the effects of natural,environmental and human induced hazards to a manageable and acceptable humanitarian levelg) Mission:• to bring a paradigm shift in disaster management from conventional response and relief to a morecomprehensive risk reduction culture
Overall Objective:• to strengthen the capacity of the Bangladesh Disaster Management Systemh) National and international Drivers• Millennium Development Goals (MDG)•

Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA)• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)• SAARC Framework for Action (SFA)Disaster Management Institutions
in Bangladesh
National Disaster
Management Council
Inter Ministerial
Disaster Management
Coordination
Committee (IMDMCC)

National Disaster
Management Advisory
Council (NDMAC)

Ministry of Food and Disaster Management

Directorate of Food

Directorate of Relief
and Rehabilitation

Disaster Management
BureauCyclone Preparedness
Programme
Implementation Board

District Disaster
Management Committee
Municipal Disaster
Management Committee

City Corporation
Disaster Management
Committee

Zone / Upazila
Union

Upazila Disaster Management Committee

Union Disaster Management Committee

Village1i) National committees under SOD•

National Disaster Management Council (NDMC)•Inter-Ministerial Disaster Management Co-ordination Committee (IMDMCC)•

National Disaster Management Advisory Committee (NDMAC)•

Cyclone Preparedness Program Implementation Board (CPPIB)•

Disaster Management Training and Public Awareness Building Task Force (DMTATF)•

Focal Point Operation Coordination Group of Disaster Management (FPOCG)•

NGO Coordination Committee on Disaster Management (NGOCC)•

Committee for Speedy Dissemination of Disaster Related Warning/ Signals (CSDDWS)j) Field Level Committees under SOD•

District Disaster Management Committee (DDMC) headed by the Deputy Commissioner (DC) toco-ordinate and review the disaster management activities at the district level•Upazila Disaster Management Committee (UZDMC) headed by the Upazila Nirbahi Officer (UNO)
to co-ordinate and review the disaster management activities at the Upazila level•

Union Disaster Management Committee (UDMC) headed by the Chairman of the Union Parishad toco-ordinate, review and implement the disaster management activities of the concerned union•

Pourashava Disaster Management Committee (PDMC) headed by Chairman of Pourashava(municipality) to co-ordinate, review and implement the disaster management activities within its
area of jurisdiction•

City Corporation Disaster Management Committee (CCDMC) headed by the Mayor of City
Corporations to co-ordinate, review and implement the disaster management activities within its
area of jurisdictionk) Infrastructure for Disaster Risk Reduction• Over 2,500 Cyclone Shelters along the coastal belt of Bangladesh.
• Killas (Elevated Land) for Shelter of Livestock.
• Flood Protection Embankment along coast line.
• 1400 Flood Shelters in Flood-Prone Areas.

l) Comprehensive Disaster Management Program (CDMP)
CDMP is a strategic institutional and programming approach that is designed to optimize the reduction of
long-term risk and to strengthen the operational capacities for responding to emergencies and disastersituations including actions to improve recovery from these events.
Strategic Focus Areas:•

Professionalizing the Disaster Management System: Establishment of Policy Program Partnership
Development Unit, Professionalizing development of Disaster Management System, etc.

• Partnership Development: Advocacy and Capacity Building of DMCs.
• Community Empowerment: Program Gap Analysis, Risk Reduction Planning, Livelihood Security andhazard Awareness, etc.
• Expanding Preparedness Program across a broader range of hazards: Earthquake and Tsunami
Preparedness, Climate Change and Research.
• Strengthening Emergency Response Capabilities: DMIC and Response Management.

m) Implementation of Hyogo Framework in Bangladesh
Adopting action-plan 2005-2015, Building the Resilience of nations and communications to Disasters at
the World Conference on Disaster Reduction in Kobe, Japan in January 2005, the 168 Governments

present and recognized their critical role in working with other actors to reduce disaster at national andlocal levels.
The first of the Hyogo Framework's five priorities of Action is to ensure that disaster risk reduction
becomes a national basis for implementation in Bangladesh

Major Disasters in Bangladesh
Year
1970
1988
1988
1989
1991
1996
1997
1998
2004
2007
2007
2009

Disaster
CycloneFlood
CycloneDrought
CycloneTornadoCyclone
Flood
Flood
Flood
CycloneCycloneDeath
470,000
2373
5704
800
138,882
545
550
918
747
800
3,406
190
1

m) Recent Major Disaster in Bangladesh: Cyclone “Aila”.
Almost 200 disaster events have occurred causing more than 500,000 deaths and leaving prolonged
damage to livelihoods, infrastructure and the economy of Bangladesh shocked by cyclone 'Aila' This tidal
surge severely damaged both life and property in southern western coastal districts of Bangladesh. In theearly hours of 25th May 2009 at noon, the cyclone "Aila' hit the Bangladesh coastal districts, at a wind of
60-70KPH accompanied by 8-10 feet tidal surges above normal tide.

10. DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN JAPANa) Overview of Disaster Situation in Japan
Japan is located along the northwestern Pacific Rim and the so called “Ring of Fire” where many
volcanoes and active earthquakes are frequently encountered. The reason for such a large concentration of
volcano activity and earthquake is active colliding at the plate boundaries. Movement of the plates andmovements of the earth’s crust caused by such movements are known as plate Tectonics. Near the islandsof Japan there is a slow but steady northwestward movement of the pacific plate against the Eurasianplate and westward movement against North American Plate. That’s why, Japan’s geographical location
is in the circum-Pacific mobile zone, where seismic and volcanic activities occur constantly. Although thecountry covers only 0.25% of the land area on the planet, the number of earthquakes and distribution ofactive volcanoes is quite high. Also, because of geographical, topographical andMeteorological conditions, the country is subject to frequent natural disasters such as typhoons, torrential
rains and heavy snow.

Every year there is a great loss of people’s lives and property in Japan due to natural disasters. Up until
the1950s, numerous large-scale typhoons and earthquakes caused extensive damage and thousands ofcasualties. However, with the progress of society’s capabilities to address disasters and the mitigation ofvulnerabilities to disasters by developing disaster management systems, promoting national landconservation, improving weather forecasting technologies, and upgrading disaster information
communications systems, disaster damage has shown a declining tendency.
In spite of such efforts, in 1995, more than 6,400 people became casualties of the Great Hanshin-Awaji
Earthquake, and in 2004, 10 typhoons - the largest number in a single year on record - crossed over Japan,
causing damage throughout the nation. There is also a high probability of the occurrence of large-scale
earthquakes in the coming decades. As such, natural
Disasters remain a menacing threat to the safety and security of the country.

Japan is one of the countries affected unpredicted events of natural disasters such as earthquake, tsunami,
floods, landslides and typhoons. Since 1950, many large scales Earthquake, Tsunami, and Typhoons
struck the country, which caused massive damage and great loss of economy. That kind of enormous
disasters killed huge amount of people. In fact the development of disaster counter measures has been
contributing to the development of sustainable disaster management system especially, advanced weather
forecasting system and disaster communication system.

The commonest disaster in Japan is Earthquake. Japan can have up to 5000 earthquakes each year, which
is about 10% out of the total occurred of the world. As a result of Earthquakes, Tsunami can also develop
to cause catastrophic damages to the coastal belt of the country, which are large waves that crash up
against the shore and can wash away people, buildings, and bridges. For example recent EQ and Tsunami(2011, Tohoku Pacific Ocean Earthquake)

Volcanic eruptions are the next dangerous disaster facing in Japan. There are 67 active volcanoes in Japan
which means 10% of the world’s total active volcanoes over in Japan. A volcanic eruption can discharge
ash and lava all over the surrounding areas including populated area too.

During the rainy season Typhoons are occurring in Japan. Severe storm may cause many damages alongwith landslides and floods. Japan hits about 29 Typhoons in the year. Some recorded due to the worst
meteorological changes, which cause significant damage and loss of the human life.

b) Disaster Management Framework in Japan
Disaster Management of Japan is categorized into 3 levels including national, regional and municipal
level. The significance of each level is detailed as follows:i) National Level:
The Prime Minister is the National Commander through the National Disaster Management Council, andthe designed government organizations (23 ministries and agencies), and designated public cooperation(63 organizations including independent administrative agencies, Bank of Japan, Japanese Red Cross
Society, NHK, electricity and gas companies). In this connection, the national council is responsible forformulation and promoting the implementation of the Basic Disaster Management Plan. Meanwhile, theother two designed agencies of government and public cooperation are responsible for formulation andimplementation of the Disaster Management Operation Plan.

ii) Prefectural Level:
The Governor is the commander ordering via the Prefectural Disaster Management Council, and thedesigned government organization and public corporations in local. The prefectural council will
conjunctionally work with the mentioned designed agencies to formulate and promote the implementationof Local Disaster Management Plan.

iii) Municipal Level:
In this level, the Mayor of City, Town and Village is the commander, as the same of Governor in
prefectural level, will take function through Municipal Disaster Management Council to formulate andpromote the implementation of Local Disaster Management Plan.

11. DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN
To correlate with the three disaster management systems, Japan has made up the basic plans, operation
plan, to effectively response to various types of disaster and to properly use in areas. The first is Basic
Disaster Management Plan- the key plan for disaster reduction activities prepared by the Central Disaster
Management Council based on the Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act, the second is Disaster
Management Operation Plan made up by each designed government organization and designed public
corporation, and the last one is Local Disaster Management Plan set up by each prefectural and municipal
council. The last two plans are based on the Basic Disaster Management Plan.

Basic Disaster Management Plan is the plan to state on comprehensive and long- term disaster reduction
issues such as disaster management related system, disaster reduction projects, early and appropriate
disaster recovery and rehabilitation, as well is scientific and technical research. For the Plan‘s structure, it
consists of various plans for each type of disasters which is categorized into 2 main points of natural
disaster and accident disasters. The tangible countermeasures will be taken by each stakeholder such as
the national and local governments, public corporations and other entities in term of the disaster phrases
of prevention and preparedness, emergency response, as well as recovery and rehabilitation. Additionally,
the conceptual formulation of the Basic Disaster Management Plan has emphasized on the important
points of hazard and risk mapping, clarification of Jurisdiction, responsibilities and procedures on
establishment of emergency response headquarter, evacuation guidance and order to citizens, designationof evacuation area in advance, procedure for disaster information gathering and dissemination, and public
participation.

Figure shows Disaster Management structure of Japan

12. BASIC LEGAL FRAMEWORKS OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN JAPANIn applying to all of the disaster phases of prevention, mitigation and preparedness, emergency response
as well as recovery and rehabilitation, relevant laws and regulations were enacted including Disaster
Countermeasures Basic Act (1961) which is the cornerstone of legislation of disaster management
which set out the basic for measures for disaster risk reduction, emergency response, post-disasterrecovery and reconstruction. It was formulated in 1961, after the happening of Typhoon Ise-wan in 1959
that caused more than 5,000 fatalities. Following acts are the other relevant acts associated with disastercountermeasures Basic Act (1961);
Erosion Control Act (1897), Disaster Relief Act (1947), Building Standard Law (1950)

Landslide Prevention Act (1958), River Act (1964), and Act on Special Measures for Large-scale
Earthquakes (1978).

(i)

Erosion Control Act 1897:

To clearly define the responsibilities of the national and local governments and other public organizations
to take necessary measures for preventing sediment-related disaster from the generation and discharge of
unstable sediment due to natural events, such as heavy-rain induced landslides and river-bed erosion, toensure a sound environment and maintain the function of river in flood control and water use, and thus tocontribute to the conservation of the national land and the stability of the people‘s livelihood.
(ii)

Disaster Relief Act 1947:

The purpose of this law is to allow the national government to take necessary emergency relief measuresin case of disaster in cooperation with local municipal governments, the Japan Red Cross, and otherrelevant organizations. Distribution of foods and drinking water, Supply of clothing, bedding, and otherbasic necessities, Medical and natal care, Rescue of disaster victim , Emergency repairs of housing
subject to disaster, Distribution and/ or loan of funding, equipment, and materials required to maintain
livelihoods, Distribution of school supplies , Interment and other matters as specified by government
ordinance.
(iii)

Building Standard Law 1950:

In Article 39 of the law, the municipal government is allowed to designate the area with considerable risk
due to tsunami, storm surge, and flood and so on as disaster prone areaǁ by its local ordinance. And it
shall be determined in the above ordinance that necessary items for disaster Prevention in the disasterprone area such as prohibition against building a residence or restriction concerning to build a building.
(iv)

Land slide Control Act 1958:

To provide the measures for preventing landslides or slag heap collapses to avoid or mitigate damage
from those hazards, and thus to contribute to the conservation of the national land and the stability of thepeople‘s livelihood.
(v)

River Act 1896:

The law is to clearly define the responsibilities of the national and local governments and other publicorganizations to take necessary measures for comprehensive river management, through which disasterdue to floods and storm surges will be prevented, rivers will be in proper use, the regular functions ofriver water will be maintained, and river environment will be improved and conserved, which willcontribute to the conservation and development of the national land, and thus ultimately to enhance publicwelfare. This law specifies the administration’s responsibilities about river management.

13. DISASTER MANAGEMENT RELATED BUDGET IN JAPAN:
The National budget for disaster management is approximately 4.5 trillion yen (average annual budget
from 1955 to 2004), accounting for approximately 5% of the total amount of budget for general accounts.
The percentage for each field is a) Scientific Technology Research 1.3% b) Disaster prevention andpreparedness, 23.6% c) National Land Conservation 48.7% d) Disaster Recovery and Rehabilitation,
26.4%. This year after Great Tohoku Earthquake, Government of Japan allocated 63 trillion yen for
rescue, relief and rehabilitation. (Source internet)

Figure shows Structure of basic disaster Management Plana) Organization Responsibility and Response Mechanism
In addition to the Central Disaster Management Council, there are 23 designated ministries and 63
designated public corporations, prefectural Disaster Management Council, and Municipal Disaster
Management Council . It also includes other main agencies namely Cabinet Secretariat, Cabinet Office,and Residents too.

The Cabinet Secretariat has strengthening been established since 1995 to take into account for the largescale disaster and serious accident including the Great Hanshin- Awaji Earthquake that happened in thattime. Government organization in wide-ranging issues, planning of basic disaster management policies
and supporting the Cabinet Secretariat to response to large-scale disaster. The Central Disaster
Management Council has been, dealing with the Basic Disaster Management Act, formed under the
Cabinet Office. The Prime Minister is the Chair person, Minister of State for Disaster Management, all 23
ministries, and heads of major public institutions and experts. The council has mainly taken task offormulation and promotion on implementation of the Basic Disaster Management Plan and Earthquake
Countermeasure Plans. When there are large-scale disaster occurred in Japan, all agencies concerned willdeal cooperatively with to disaster in areas. The two main organizations, the Cabinet Office, and Prime
Minister‘s Office, will be directly responsible for this matters in line with national commanding. Firstly,
the Cabinet will collect the information and dispatch the initial emergency survey team to the happening
areas, coordinate and hold the inter-ministerial meeting, and then dispatch again to investigate thesituations. Meanwhile, the Prime minister‘s Office will keep a close watch to the situation, analysis ofdamage and discuss the disaster situation.

b) Progress in Disaster Management Laws and Systems
In Japan, the disaster management system has been developed and strengthened, which is shown in thefollowing figure.

Source: Disaster Management in Japan (Cabinet office, Government of Japan)c) Overview of Flood Disaster in Japan
Japan is very vulnerable to the water-related disasters. Severe water-related disasters have been causing
human losses every year. Floods and sediment related disasters have occurred in more than 90% of
municipalities throughout Japan during the past ten years. (1994 to 2003) The risk of disaster is becoming
greater due to global warming. Heavily concentrated rainfalls exceeding 50 mm or even 100 mm per hourare on the increasing trend.

Year

Dead

or

missing No.

persons
1953

1760

1996(July)48

ofinundated Reason

houses1996(September)

FloodingduetoTyphoon)2004

240

199,371

Concentrated rainfalls
and landings by 10
typhoons

2005

41

32,581

Precipitation of over
100 mm per hour

2006

42

25,804Heavy rainfall

Causes of flood:
01. Many rivers are very steep with a short distance from the source to the sea, resulting in rapid flow.
Furthermore, most of urban areas are located in low-lying areas that are lower than the waterlevel during floods.
02. Population and city functions are concentrated in areas below zero-meters level in coastal areas ofthree major bays. Catastrophic disasters are anticipated once the embankments are failed.
03. Approximately half of the population and three-quarters of total assets are concentrated in lowlying areas. Major damage is anticipated when flooding occurs.
04. Level of structural improvement is lower compared with other countries. (Compared with otherindustrialized nations, the level of safety secured by flood control measures is lower in Japan.
05. Aggravation of flood damage by urbanization.
Rapid urbanization has been in progress in many parts of the country, particularly in the Tokyo
metropolitan area.
Asphalt and concrete prevent natural permeation of storm water into the ground. As a result,storm water fills rivers and depressions more quickly in urban areas than in rural ones, increasing
the risk of urban flood damage.
06. Occurrence of urban –type floods
Normally, the flow rate of rivers in urban areas is extremely low, but urban-type floods frequently
occur when typhoons hit because the rain water falling in the catchment concentrates andoutflows within a short period, paralyzing urban functions and flooding underground shopping
malls.

d) Framework of river management in Japan
Rivers subject to the river law are classified into Class A and Class B rivers, depending on the importanceof their roles. The roles for managing rivers are tasked to the Minister of Land , Infrastructure andTransport (Regional Directors of Maintenance Agencies), as well as the governors of prefectures.
Management of small-scale rivers that do not fall into the categories of Class A or Class B is delegated tomunicipal government mayors in accordance with the rules and regulations for class B rivers. (Lawapplicable rivers)(i).

Class A river (directly managed segment) system is managed by the National Government(Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport) and some designated segments of class A rivers
are managed by the governor of the prefecture or mayor of a government ordinance designatedcity(specified segments)(ii).

Class B rivers are managed by the governor of the prefecture or mayor of a government ordinancedesignated city.

Rivers of Japan are characterized by their relatively short lengths and considerably steep gradients due tothe narrow and mountainous topography of the country. In this regard, the Mogami, the Fuji and theKuma are regarded as the three most rapid rivers of Japan. Typical rivers of Japan rise from mountainous
forests and cut out deep V-shaped valleys in their upper reaches, and form alluvial plains in their lower
reaches which enable the Japanese to cultivate rice fields and to set up cities. Most rivers are dammed tosupply both water and electricity.
The longest river of Japan is the Shinano, which flows from Nagano to Niigata. The Tone has the largest
watershed and serves water to more than 30 million inhabitants of Tokyo metropolitan area.

e) Flood Management and Sediment, Erosion Control in Japan:
Various facilities and systems have been established to provide protection from flood damage.
1. River information systems ensure successful river management.
Radar rain gauges and telemeter systems are used to measure water level, rainfall, etc.
Information thus obtained is processed and provided to concerned governmental agencies andlocal residents so that timely and appropriate river management and flood defense measures canbe taken.
2. Widening of channels and embankments
Rise in water level is reduced by increasing the width. Levees are also used to prevent
overtopping.
3. Detention basins

Water is diverted from a swollen river, and the water is returned to the river after the threat offlooding has disappeared.
4. Floodways
Canals are used to divert water from the middle or lower reaches of the river and directly channel
the water to other rivers or the sea. This technique helps to reduce river flow.
5. DamDams store water in the event of flooding caused by heavy rain and Control River flows
downstream to alleviate flood damage (Figure 8.1). Dam’s function both as a means to ensurestable water supply to downstream residents and as a means to generate power.

Figure shows Flood control system of Kino River, Japan using a flood control Damf) Comprehensive flood control measures in Japan:
Japan is in need of comprehensive flood control measures to cope with rapid urbanization. Following arethose comprehensive approaches.
(1)River basin measures such as the construction of facilities designed to preserve and enhance theretention and detention capabilities of river basins and the development of land uses and buildingsthat are highly resistant to floods

2.

For early response, evacuation and land use planning processes following maps are readily
available for long term use.

(a).

Flood hazard map(b).

Expected Inundation Area map(c).

Past flooding area map(d).

Key area and river facility map for Flood Controlg) Flood forecasting system

Figure shows Satellite communication facilities

Japanese Meteorological Agency is playing the major role in forecasting natural disasters through its
advanced monitoring network including satellites. The whole role of activities implements with thefollowing goals in compliance with the Act of Ministry and meteorological services act,
• Prevention and mitigation of natural disasters.
• Safety of transport.
• Development and prosperity of industry.
• Improvement of public welfare.

h) Framework of Forecast Operation (JMA)
National Forecast Centre

Regional Forecast Centres(11)Local Meteorological Observatories(47)i) JMA’s Meteorological Services
1. Space-based Observation
2. Upper-air Observation
3. Radar Observation
4. Surface Observation
5. Ocean Observation
6. International Data Exchange

LMO is responsible for issuance of information on weather disaster prevention such as warnings/
advisories for each prefecture.

j) Main Objective of Local Meteorological Observatories:
Disaster Forecasting to save lives–

Collecting weather and EQ data–

Analysis and Prediction of Weather–

Issuing Warnings and Meteorological Information

14. THE GREAT TOHOKU PACIFIC OCEAN EARTHQUAKEThe great Pacific Ocean Earthquake occurred on March 11, 2011 at 2:46 pm at a magnitude of 9.0 at a
depth approximately 25 kilometer and tsunami hit along Sanriku offing, near the east coast of Honshu,
Japan. The magnitude of the main shock was is the largest in Japan History. Either way it was thestrongest quake ever recorded in Japan. It has been followed by more than 150 powerful aftershocks.
Scientists believe that Japan is located along the northwestern Pacific Rim and so it called the “ring ofFire” which many volcanoes are active and earthquake occurs frequently in Japan. Tectonic movement
northwestern movements of the pacific plate and North American plate and collision between this twoplates created Tohoku Pacific Ocean Earthquake followed by jet storm tsunami of 10 meters devastatedthe entire eastern Japan namely Fukushima prefecture, Iwate, Sendai, Soma city, Miyagi prefecture. Japan
faced a potential catastrophe.

After a quake-crippled nuclear power plant exploded and sent low levels of radiation floating toward
Tokyo, prompting some people to flee the capital and others to stock up on essential supplies. This
earthquake and tsunami has not only claimed heavy loss of human lives and properties but also damaged
the Fukushima nuclear power plant which has been generating radiation risks. Japan also estimated theimmense economic impact of the March 11 earthquake and tsunami, saying it could hit $309 billion-double that of the 1995 Kobe quake and nearly four times more than Hurricane Katrina.

The confirmed death toll from the earthquake and tsunami that battered Japan's northeast coast rose to
14,084 and Japan holds out little hope for 13,511 officially listed as missing. The number of injured
people stood at 5302, number of house completely collapsed 68,005 and partially collapsed house rose to23,382(source: (National Police Agency, Japan).Large areas of the countryside remained surrounded bywater and unreachable. Fuel stations were closed and people were running out of gasoline for theirvehicles. Primary damage of property worth about 25 trillion Japanese Yen which is equivalent to 304
billion US dollars. (Source: University Professors and financial Expert of Japan). The government said
275,000 people have been evacuated to emergency shelters, many of them without power, water and gas
connections.
In Tohoku, as Japan's northeast is called, aid has trickled in agonizingly slowly, despite the mobilizationof 100,000 Japanese soldiers for the relief effort. It took more than a week after the earthquake, forexample, for the region's highways, which are reserved for emergency vehicles. Civil society hasemphasized the need for more community involvement through organizing community volunteers.
Meanwhile, community members of those affected areas have started working which will gear up therelief and rehabilitation activities of the earthquake and tsunami affected areas. The Great Hanshin Awaji

experience and other disaster related experiences would help Japan to recover from this great disaster andhuman catastrophe.

15. DISASTER SCENARIO IN ADRC MEMBER COUNTRIES AND RECOVERYINITIATIVES:a) Over view of Natural Disasters in Sri Lanka
Every year, different types of natural disasters affect Sri Lanka, like other developing countries. Natural
Disasters in Sri Lanka are mainly hydro-meteorological and geological phenomenal events such as floods,
landslides, cyclones, tidal waves droughts and Tsunamis. Following are the outline of the disasters
occurred. Natural Disasters have caused extensive damage to the people and property every year,
disrupting social and economic development endeavors.
I.

FloodsII.

Landslides, slope failures and rock fall

III.

CyclonesIV.

Drought

V.

Coastal erosion

VI.

Subsidence and erosion

VII.

Ground settlements

VIII.

Reservoir induced earth quacks

IX.

TsunamiX.

Minor Earth quacks

Out of all these natural disasters, Landslides and floods are the dominants. Even when compared to all theother south Asian countries, flood and landslides are the most dominant natural disaster in Sri Lanka

Table shows South Asia, Population, Urban Share and Natural Disasters caused
Country

Population (Millions)

Urban

Natural Disasters faced

1997

2010

2025

%

1. Bangladesh

122.2

152.1

180.3

16

Cyclones, Flooding

2. Bhutan

0.8

1.1

1.5

15

Earthquake

3. India

969.7

1182.71384.626

Cyclones, Flooding, Earthquakes, Landslides

4. Maldives

0.3

0.4

0.6

26

Sea Erosion, Cyclones

5. Nepal

22.6

30.8

41.4

10

Landslides, Earthquakes

6. Pakistan

137.8

176.4

232.9

28

Earthquakes, Landslides, Droughts

7. Sri Lanka

18.7

22

23.4

23

Landslides,

Flooding,

Cyclones,Droughts,

TsunamiSource: Based on “Human Settlement in South Asia” and “Role of R & D institutions in Disaster Risk
Mitigation”, 1998

Historical evidences of Sri Lanka clearly show that, there was a strong disaster management systemespecially to overcome severe water shortage during droughts. This was done by adopting massive
irrigation systems, which includes reservoirs to provide much needed water for farming in the dry zone,
which covers about 2/3 of the country’s land area. Sri Lanka has an agriculture-based economy consistingof a plantation agriculture sector and subsistence agriculture sector. Even if the economic reforms fromclose economy to open economy since 1977, agriculture sector continued to play an important role in theeconomy. The agriculture sector still contributes about 21% to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of thecountry and provides livelihood for about 40% of the labor force. Wet zone of the country, where a large
number of major rivers are flowing through, is prone to severe flooding frequently. Mostly humansettlements located on the riverbanks and low-lying areas are mainly subjected to flooding. Sometimes,
settlements below the man made irrigation tanks are subjected to flooding mostly when tank bunts fail.
Coastal erosion and Indian Ocean tsunami are the other major disasters that Sri Lanka faces. However,most of the communities that are affected by coastal erosion and tsunami are unauthorized. Moreover,some parts of eastern province of the country are prone to cyclones. However, occurrences of cyclones
are very less frequent when compared to the other disasters.

In the last 10 years period before 2003, Sri Lanka has experienced 30 major disaster events in which
about 398 peoples were killed and 27.5 million people were affected. The total economic losses were
estimated to be almost US$ 5.96 billion approximately. Flooding & Landslides in 2003 affected 137,221
families (720,500 persons), claimed 252 lives and also 37,227 houses were damaged. Tsunami in 2004
affected 260,967 families (1.3 million), claimed 31,225 persons, the missing people were around 41,000
and 108,467 houses were damaged. Total estimated economic loss for tsunami was around us$ 3.6 billion.
Although 1,600km from the epicenter, the waves struck with huge force and swept inland as far as 5
kilometers. Waves as high as six meters had crashed into coastal villages, sweeping away people, cars andeven a fully packed train with 1700 passengers. It was the worst human disaster in Sri Lankan history.

b) Disaster Management in Sri Lanka:
Disaster Management Centre (DMC), which was established as per the Disaster Management Act of Sri
Lanka consists of several subdivision in order to function the DM activities properly (Figure 7.8). DMC
will be directing, issuing guidelines, facilitating, coordinating, monitoring , where necessary directly
implementing or enforcing activities related to:(1). Disaster Management Technology, Long-term Mitigation & DRR
Under the Technology and mitigation activities, many activities are carried out such as Hazard Mapping
and Risk Assessment, Information and Data Collection, Research and Analysis, Building Technology,

Development and maintenance of DMC Website, Long term Disaster Risk Reduction, Implementation of
specific risk reduction projects to reduce specific identified risks that can cause future disasters, DRR
integration in Development, long-term action planning.
(2). Early Warning
When a disaster has been predicted or forecast by a respective scientific organization, DMC do havesystems in place for receiving forecasting and early warning. Also DMC is forecasting impending
disasters followed by early warning and dissemination procedures.
(3). Emergency Operations in case of a disaster
DMC has established a National Emergency Operation Centre, which is 24x7 in service. It is now under
the process of establishment of emergency operation rooms at provincial, district and divisional levels insome districts, provincial and district level emergency operation centers have already been established. In
addition, DMC is carrying out Emergency Operations, coordinating with armed forces, police and otherrelated agencies at national and all sub levels.
(4). Preparedness Planning (National and other levels)
Preparation of National Disaster Management Plan and Emergency Operation Plans along with districtlevel and divisional level preparedness plans are in progress. Under such preparedness plans, DMC isfacilitating, issuing guidelines, coordinating, directing and monitoring of preparation of disaster
preparedness and response plans at provincial, district, local authority, divisional and village levels. The
major objective of the preparation of preparedness plans is to improve response on time and effective
response, equitable relief distribution, speedy recovery, timely rehabilitation and reconstruction at
national level and all sub levels such as District and Divisional levels.
(5). Training, Education & Public AwarenessIn order to train aware all groups of the general public, school community, employees of government,
private and all other organizations, training programs are conducted. Public Awareness Programs forofficials at all levels, school children and community level are also conducted. Objective of these
activities is to reduce Disaster risks. Disaster management is being included in school curricula and inuniversity curricula as appropriate.

c) Afghan Training and livelihood Initiative after Earthquake
Afghanistan’s disaster management system has been mainly focused on relief and rehabilitation rather
than concentrating on disaster preparedness, rescue, recovery and disaster planning. Due to its socioeconomic and geo-political situation, comprehensive disaster management system has not yet been
undertaken in Afghanistan. As Afghanistan is an earthquake prone country, and is located in one of themost active seismic belts of the world, seismic risk needs to be incorporated in its rehabilitation process.

UNCRD Hyogo Office carried out “Afghan Training and Livelihood Initiative (ALTI)” in Afghanistanfrom October 2002 to June 2003. Under the need of the holistic rehabilitation after more than two decadesof conflict and strife, the urgent need was to build houses of people. The ALTI focused on developmentsof guidelines for earthquake safe construction practices, training of masons and engineers, andconstruction of model houses. All these activities aimed to empower the communities with their active
participation in this process. In this community based initiative, livelihood recovery was incorporated
through revitalization of vineyards using a cooperative system. These efforts altogether develop humanresources, provide sustainable livelihood is linked to the long term recovery of the country.

d) Patanka New Life (PNY) Plan in India after Gujarat Earthquake
After the Gujarat earthquake of January 2001, Patanka New Life was initiated as joint initiative of diverse
organizations including government, non-government, academics and international organizations forcommunity based effective rehabilitation. The aim of the initiative was to train and empower local
masons and communities with proper earthquake-safer technologies focusing on local tradition andculture. Emphasis was to ensure confidence building and long-term use of traditional technologies. There
were two major components of the initiative: one construction and rehabilitation of model village, andtraining and confidence building of communities through shaking table demonstration testing. The
characteristic feature of the initiative was to focus on the holistic approach of the rehabilitation including
livelihood. The initiative was successful, especially in terms of community involvement and ownership.
The initiative was considered a successful model for sustainable community recovery. The PNY wasconceived as a model program right from its inception stage. It sought to empower the affected
community to the extent that they are sufficiently resilient against future disasters.

f) Disaster Management System in Nepal
The Government of Nepal has enacted Natural Calamity (Relief) Act, 1982 for disaster management in
Nepal. Prior to the enactment of the Act, 1982, natural disasters were treated in ad hoc basis. There were
no pre-disaster preparedness plans and post disaster mitigating measures. All the forces and resourceswere, however, used on an ad-hoc basis when they occurred to alleviate the misery brought on to thecommunity.

The main objectives of the act are to arrangement for relief operations and to provide protection of lives
and properties of people. The Act includes disaster: Earthquake, Fire outbreak, Storm, Flood, Landslide,
Drought, Famine, Epidemic, Industrial Accident and Explosion. Earthquake, Fire outbreak, Storm, Flood,Landslide, Drought, Famine and Epidemic are found major disasters in Nepal.

The Act also defines Natural Calamities Relief works. According to the Act natural calamities relief
works means: i) any relief work to be carried out in the area affected or likely to be affected, ii) easepeople’s grief and inconvenience, iii) rehabilitation of disaster victims, protection of life and iv) propertyof people, Preparation and adoption of preventive measures.
The Act has made a provision of Centre Natural Calamity Relief Committee (CNDRC) arranged at thecentre level which is comprised of 34 members from the different agencies. In addition to this, the Act
also made the provision of Regional Disaster Relief Committee and District Disaster Relief Committee atregional and district level respectively.

g) Disaster Management System in Pakistan
Disaster caused by natural hazards have been affecting socio economic situation in Pakistan. Pakistan has
a geographic and physiographic location that presents risks for natural disasters of the highest possibleorder. The great loss of lives and property in the Kashmir earthquake (2005) are sufficient to depict theharsh realities of natural disasters threatening Pakistan. Earthquakes are not only the threat; over two
thousand people have died in floods in last 50 years. In Pakistan every year , hundreds of die because of
flash floods, debris flows and landslides, with considerable loss of properties, agriculture, roads andlivelihoods. However, the disaster management initiative in Pakistan is not enough to handle disastersituation.

Pakistan’s concept of preparedness for natural disasters has remained restricted to relief. Institutions suchas Emergency Relief Cell at federal level and Relief Departments at provincial level have coordinatedplans for storage and supply of relief goods to district level and these are distributed in the communities
affected. However, there is no institution in the country for mitigation, preparedness, response (other thanrelief –including search, rescue, evacuation, and emergency medical and food services). Over the years
Pakistan Army carries rescue and evacuation activities and short term medical services and food. Until the2005 earthquake, the concept of long term rehabilitation for communities affected was lacking almost
completely.

h) Disaster Management System in India:
The disaster management structure was built up following India’s independence in 1947, which is thebasic structure upon which changes and revisions are taking place currently. A comprehensive description
is given of the federal structure and the avenues through which power is devolved to the states, with thecentral government in a supportive, enabling role providing financial and physical resources, warning,transport, inter- state movement and emergency food supplies. Nationally the Home Ministry carries outthis work through a central Relief Commissioner who receives information through Meteorological
Departments , early warning and forecasting systems and the Central Water Commission. There is also
crisis management group to coordinate the activities of central Ministries and review the contingency
plans of state Governments. Overarching this are the three committees at cabinet level: The National
Crisis Management Committee (NCMC), headed by the Cabinet Secretary and two other Cabinet
Committees, one on Natural Calamities and the other on security. At state level, the Relief
Commissioners are look after relief and rehabilitation for disasters and are under the Chief Secretary andat the district level natural disasters are the responsibility of the District collectors or Magistrates. Funds
namely Calamity Relief Funds is allocated and these come in varying proportions from the national andstate levels. This structure had been institutionalized in India since 1947.

Since 2002, the shift in paradigm is being institutionalized through a National Disaster Management
Framework and later in 2005, legal frame work was formulated. The National Disaster Management Act
was formulated. Following the Act it became mandatory to establish a National disaster Management
Authority (NDMA) under the chairmanship of the Prime Minister with a National Executive Committee
to assist it. A National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM) was then established to train and also tocarry out research and support policy formulation as well as give support to other institutions in the field
throughout country.

Regionally SAARC Disaster Management Centre (SDMC) was established in New Delhi in 2006 andthere is also a Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation(BIMSTEC) that is considering making disaster management one of its key areas of cooperation.

16. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTThe ‘community in community Development ‘includes both the hardware and software aspects of“community” A community includes both software structures such as community Based organizations
and hardware aspects includes roads and infrastructures. Following points are necessary for community
Development:
1. Holistic-ness: Software considerations are important and consideration must be made as how thesystem can be built up(e.g. Cleaning roads together every morning).If residential areas and small
factories are converted into nice building , it might be good in terms of community’s hardware
aspects but if the people inside suffering from loans , then there is a problem with software aspect
so it must be investigated. Through its content.
2. Voluntary: “ Development “ in community development refers to handmade development , just

like handmade sake breweries. We must think about how we can development the system tocreate an environment that takes to advantage the characteristics of the community.
3. Cooperation: This refers to implementing development to everybody. With regard to who‘everybody’ is the importance not participation rate but the connections of different types ofpeople of different backgrounds.
4. Sustainability: Recovery community development during has to continue and sustained as
development during daily life. In Kobe ,the nearly half of the 100 community Development
Committees have ceased operation after land readjustment projects.
It is important for community development to incorporate the view point of disaster reduction,
but disaster reduction is calculating the sum of negative damages with positive initiatives. The
issue of large public or issue of small public comes into considerations.


Large public e.g. Construction of major roads ( the responsibility of the central government
or local government )Small Public: Decision making at the town or ward level (over crowded urban areas, antiseismic strengthening of aging buildings, concrete walls, narrow alleyways, environment)
issues that can be solved through community development, voluntary/endogenous action bycommunity members are necessary.

a) Community Action
Risk reduction measures are most successful when they involve the direct participation of the people most
likely to be exposed to hazards , in the planning ,decision making and community mobilization and toincrease the capacity and responsibility of the community. In theory it’s easy to define the role ofcommunity but in practice it is difficult to involve the community in the time of disaster. From experience
it is suggested that the involvement of local residents in protecting their own resources is possible and canwork if sufficient attention, and investment is given. It’s very much necessary to enhance and strengthen
capacity of the local community.
Viable of community based disaster depend on a favorable political environment that understands,
promotes and supports the community participation process.

b) Disaster Management Framework and Community Development:
There is a strong relationship between National Disaster Management Framework and Community
mobilization. The roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders including the GO-NGOs andcommunity based organizations have been categorically defined in the NDMF. However the major
problem is to coordinate different Go-NGOs and Community affected by disaster.

Development planners and researchers have increasingly argued that preparing for sudden events , such as
natural disasters ,offer opportunities for devising institutional arrangements that can embrace new andchanging conditions. In addition a community with a high degree of horizontal integration has a tight knitsocial network among social organizations. A community with a low degree of social network amongorganizations has a weakly knit social network. on the other hand a lack of vertical social network
between communities and outside organizations can create problems , particularly when combine thisweak system of horizontal integration. This condition can result in loss of local/community control over
DR programs. Under this situation knowledge of intentions, procedures, requirements, and benefits ofoutside programs likely to be weak. Interactions between local and outside organizations is low and as aresult , the chance of external DR programs fitting local needs and capacities are reduced.

The top down mitigation program in Latin America had a serious flaw such as failure to involve people
since community participation was often limited to provision of labor in self help projects . This failed toaddress the vulnerability as because of complex relationship between community and social, political andphysical and economic environment.

According to Maskery(1989) potential relationship between the vertical and horizontal integration andcommunities are following four types:
A Type 1 community is ideally suited for effective recovery effort. It possesses strong vertical andhorizontal integration . It has developed well developed ties to external resources and programs, while it
has a viable horizontal network that will allow it to exert power and influence in the recovery process.
A Type 2 community represents as autonomous , relatively isolated community with few vertical ties.
While it has a viable local structure , it suffers from lack of knowledge about and interaction with external
resources.
A Type 3 community is a classic state of powerlessness and dependency . It is less likely to be able toinfluence the recovery will not be consistent with the local needs , concerns and values.
A Type 4 community faces significant obstacles to undertaking successful recovery efforts as it lacks
access to external resources. If these vertical channels are activated , however it still lacks viable , local
horizontal for effectively receiving aid or influencing the recovery process.

c) Community Participation and Recovery:
After disasters there should be momentum towards recovery and implementation. In recovery there must
be strong present to make better plan. For recover momentum professor Yoshiteru Murosaki (Kwansei

Gakuin University) theorized three types:
Momentum, from Lessons: The Rafaelo recovery model(disaster utopias and its recovery requires arehabilitation process), momentum occurs after destruction. According to how momentum is applied ,things will better or worse than before. The momentum from lessons becomes important.
Momentum to rebound from crisis: people’s fundamental feelings to overcome difficulties , “like darn it
but I will get over this”.
Project Momentum: The energy from support by concentration of global assistance and projects. It isnecessary to apply momentum correctly according to the needs of community.

d) Objectives and Challenges of Recovery :T he principle objective of recovery is to “create values” by learning from lessons. In order t o arrive at
the “creation of new values” by learning from lessons. In order to arrive at the “creation of new values”
there are three points to be made:1. To immediately work towards disaster recovery.
2. Whether it has become safer than before.
3. To solve the contradictions and issues faced by the subject community.

f) Three Pillars of Community Development:
According to Director General Urban Development Department, Kobe City Government Mr. Hisanori
Nakayama three pillars of community development with resident’s participation are as follows:
Local Consultation Centers: Kobe city prepared local consultation centers after 1995 earthquake because
it was impossible to talked at length at evacuation centers , then Kobe city made ready local consultation
centers.

Community Development Council: Because it is better to organize as a group rather to act individually,
the council is established. If the council collects the needs of the community, government will listen. In
the case it is shown that there were neighborhood committees from before the earthquake, it wasdetermined that there could up to 10 areas within the communities.

Dispatching Community Consultants: After the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, Hyogo prefecture
government did not enforce community consultant one sided on community. Rather, it was two-way
communication between local government and community members, residents could choose consultants
and these could also be academics. Consultant fees were paid for by the government. Most communities
hired consultants, who they were accustomed to from before. Up to here are the large pillars and from thispoint forward becomes the resident participatory strategyg)The Concept of Recovery Process:The process of recovery consists of the stages of management of people, resources and structure on theway to reaching the objectives of recovery. For this management , there are “three requisites for recovery”
that are as following:
1. Heart/spirit of recovery: tenacity for improvement and norm in recovery. How the hope and faithof community can be foster that should be considered.
2. Skills for recovery: Planning skills in recovery process is most significant part of newly
undertaken projects for community of the affected areas. Both hardware((physical) andsoftware(Human resources) element should be under considers ion the recovery process.
3. System for recovery: community participation and collaboration among the members of thecommunity is most important for creative recovery process. Partnership should be developed
between community, stakeholders and the local government for smooth recovery processh) Principles of Recovery
As a principle of recovery we have to involve the local community or stakeholders for successful recoverfrom post disaster situations. Here locality or community refers to
1. To sustain local society or community
2. To carry on local culture of the community3.

To utilize local resources.

i) Complementarities of Community:
1. To promote cooperative coordination
2. To encourage self help of the affected people of the communi8ty.
3. To prioritized local autonomy of the community.
The significance to connect between humans or members of the community, employment generation,
protect the interests of the locality or local community and preserve the history and culture of the local
community helps to recover from disaster quickly.

17. COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION IN BANGLADESH:
It is well established that the damaging effects of disasters on human lives and properties could be
reduced greatly by two methods, namely structural and non-structural measures. The first one requires theinvestment of billions of dollars in the form of infrastructural development e.g. construction of

embankments, dykes, raising of roads, construction of shelters, private houses, etc. Bangladesh has
invested quite a substantial amount of money in these constructions, which are still too little compared tothe huge need. Non structural measure includes creating public awareness through community
participation and training/drills of public and school children.

For a resource-constrained and highly disaster- prone country like Bangladesh, it is strongly advocatedthat we should combine hardware and software components of disaster management, and opt for the lessexpensive non-structural measures. This involves a massive Public Awareness Programme (PAP) leading
to the enhancement of the capacity of the vulnerable people to cope with disasters. It is recommended tointegrate PAP with structural measures in order to ensure active participation of people with theinfrastructures e.g. maintenance and use of cyclone shelters, embankments, etc.

It is an established fact that during natural disasters, particularly in the post-disaster emergency phases,
the people themselves, their extended families and the nearest communities, meet most of the survival
needs of the distressed people — surely NOT the public, private and foreign organizations, as projected in
the mediaa) The Cyclone preparedness Program (CPP):
After the 1970 cyclone, which killed 5000,000 people, the government and the Bangladesh Red CrescentSociety began working together to improve coastal warning and evacuation. The Cyclone Preparedness
Program (CCP) covers almost 11 districts and 3500 villages. Its activities include issuing warnings,
building and operating shelters (there are 1,350 along coast, some built by other agencies) assisting with
evacuation, search and rescue, first aid, relief and rehabilitation, and building up community preparedness
capacity.

The backbone of the project is cadre of 32000 village volunteers , men and women, organized into local
teams of 12. They are equipped with radios to monitor weather bulletins , megaphones and hand operated
sirens , first kits ,rescue equipments and protective clothing. They are not paid but receive travel costs anddaily allowances for attending sessions . In periods between cyclone volunteers are trained by permanent
Red Crescent staffs. They receive three day basic training in cyclone preparedness refreshers courses
every five years. Special training in subjects such as radio use, first aid, and leadership is provided
separately.

The volunteers organize regular rehearsals and demonstrations in villages, the project aims to hold at least
260 mass community awareness demonstrations each year. Plays have been written for the programs todisseminate information about storing emergency rations, safe shelters and hygiene .More than 2000,000
people have been seen these. Folk songs, wall paintings, video shows and posters are among the othermethods used to raise awareness. The village volunteer groups are linked each other and to Red Crescentoffices at field and higher levels through a network of radio stations. This network is maintained
throughout the year and runs 24 hours a day during warning or emergency period. The system is costly
and requires ongoing funding from the government and the International Red Cross/Red Crescent
movement. Extending its coverage and improving its operational effectiveness are continuing challenges.
However it is widely acknowledge being highly effective. Hundreds of thousands of people can now
routinely be evacuated from the path of cyclones. In May, 1994, three quarters of millions of people weresafely evacuated; only 127 died.(Source: Cyclone preparedness Program(London: British Red Cross
Society, NGO initiatives in Risks Case Study 4,2000)

This community based early warning through devoted volunteers have been proven most effective tool tocreate awareness among the community members. This program has been jointly run by Government of
Bangladesh and Bangladesh Red Crescent Society. At present, operation and network of the cyclone
preparedness program has been further extended to 11 coastal districts, 32 Sub-districts thoughstrengthening the capacity in disaster management in coastal people of Bangladesh. The number oftrained volunteers has been raised to 492150. Due to the active role of volunteers in coastal belts, thesevere tornado and storm surge ‘SIDR’ killed only 200 people in 3406 and another Tornado anddevastating cyclone ‘ AILA’ killed only 190 people. This community based preparedness program is wellknown to local community and any message/early warning issued from CPP volunteers regarding cyclone,
tidal surge or tsunami is considered with highest priority by local community and they evacuate quickly after
receiving warning from them. So this is the best practice and effective tool to organize, prepare and evacuate
community at the time of disasters.

b) Traditional community coping mechanism and Community participation
Disasters such as floods and droughts are linked with the collective and environmentally sound use oflands and tenure at community level. Ultimately good practices of disaster management depend on thecommunity participation. Conventional practice of disaster management is respected in many Africancountries more than modern law. However, traditional ways of disaster management is replaced bymodern economic and social values, which demonstrates increasing vulnerability and exposure to hazards
and weakening the conventional community good practices. For example, in the Brazilian rain forests ,where the indigenous groups’ interests are being replaced by economic ones, that turns forest into pastoral
lands. As a result. Land degradation as well as floods and drought increasing and forcing social exclusion.
In this way community participation process in disaster management is being weakened. These
considerations yet to be taken seriously in national strategy for disaster reduction in every country.

Traditional Coping Mechanism and Community Participation in Bangladesh: Detail
Description of the Situation:
Experiences and sufferings are more or less similar in floods, cyclone situation in Bangladesh. For floodand cyclone affected people there were specific social, economic and physical implications. Some of the
difficulties faced by flood and cyclone victims include lack of early warning, delay in rescue, recovery
and rehabilitation by the government agencies, loss of possessions, fear of extortion and looting, andseparation from their social network.

Besides these, other important problems faced by flood and cyclone victims are: no work, no income, anddisruption of regular routine life, lack of fuel for cooking, difficulties in using latrines, managing grass for
cattle and goats/ships, water-related illness, dog/snake bites, risk of drowning of young kids, adverse
effect on income generating activities, etc. However, for survival, the affected village community needs
emergency help. This initial help is needed for saving life and properties of the disaster victims. If quickly
immediate shelters, food and clothing and first aid could not be provided, it would cause more sufferings
to the affected people. That’s why, village community under the guidance of elected union council/ward
members face the challenges of disasters according to the policy “Do Yourself or Self help and self
adaptation”. This is the most effective policy to face disasters like flood and cyclone. Helping each otherat the time of crisis and helping family, neighbors and village community are the guiding principle of self
adaptation of community mobilization.

Women and children are often the most vulnerable groups during the floods, suffering from personal
hygiene-related problems and domestic violence. Adolescent girls face additional problems in disastersituations. In most of the cases, they are unable to conform to socio-cultural norms during disasters, they
are confronted with a loss of self- respect and a sense of shame.

Poorer groups are exposed to increased vulnerabilities during the floods. Even though each disaster is
unique in nature, scope and timing, the problems faced are basically similar. Disasters do not give rise to
new or uncommon diseases. People suffer and die in the wake of most disasters from exactly the samediseases that they have always suffered and died from. The only difference is that the burden of diseases
is up and the defenses are down. What was already bad simply become worse.

In all cases of disaster the most effective form of Floods and cyclones usually result in an acute scarcity
of safe drinking water due to contamination of water sources such as tube wells and reserve tanks. This
adversely affects the existing poor health conditions of the slum dwellers. During any disaster situation,
work and wages become scarce for the poor. Lack of work and increasing uncertainties due to the floods
led to increased tension among family members, resulting in some incidents of domestic violence. In fact,
the losses of a landless person in such a disaster could be as much as half of his entire year’s income.

During floods and cyclones, people faced different kinds of problems in the shelters. The shelters are notadequate for the large number of people housed there. However, people in village community adopted
various survival strategies with their limited resources and make relentless effort as long as they could,
before moving to the shelters or any other places.

Good practice
The village community has adopted different indigenous and adaptive strategies which they learn fromexperience, from ancestors, from school ,from local government bodies, NGOs and some they learn frominformal village community under the leadership of Union council/ward members. For example, natural
early warning system by watching the sky when it take the shape of elephant’s muscular trunk, judging
the wind motion and speed before cyclone and tidal surge through natural observation from experience,
issues of sanitation, safe drinking water, health and hygiene, women’s health, problems of adolescent girland children’s diseases, waterborne diseases, first aid, community drills all the village community
members learn informally.

During and after floods, such as change of food habit and timing, diminished consumption of food,specially by women in order to avoid using latrines in the day time, use of special clay stoves (chula),raising the floor of cowsheds, preparation of seedbeds for rice and mustard on floating platforms (macha),tying their children to a pillar or macha. For safety of durable and valuable items the villagers wrap
valuable items by plastic bags and put it by digging hole in the ground of the home stead. In some cases,
community people responded to the floods with collective action.

Informal village community volunteers and member’s “self adaptation and self help” initiative at the time
disasters are using the lessons learnt from various informal sources from the nature, from ancestors, from

informal education programs and from different local government bodies, GO and NGOs. They did not
drink floodwater; they did not even let their cattle drink this floodwater. They washed their dishes andutensils with clean water after washing with floodwater. They eat less and drink less so that they need not
to use latrines frequently. The village community, knew the risk of using the floodwater. They adopted
new cultivation technique and prepared seedbeds for rice and mustard on floating platforms (macha).This
yield same production of rice and mustards like normal seasons. The non formal community meeting has
been constantly warming people about its danger.

Major Achievements:“Self help and self adaptation” or “Do Yourself” policy has been proved as the best policy to overcome
the preliminary risk of disasters.
Community participation in the dissemination of early warnings to community through local andtraditional early warning methods.
Leadership of union/ward members as village community head has been proved successful and effective.
As a result, at the time of disaster, local government, first involve the elected members and chairman tomitigate the sufferings of community people.
Informal learning from experience, ancestors, nature and from GO-NGOs has taken a unique shapeamong the village community members and each of the members now understands what to do, when to do
and how to adapt with the adverse situation of make shift shelters at the time of disasters.
Ensured safety, security of lives and properties of disaster affected people through informal community
volunteers and village defense party.
Informal community leadership and informal self help, self contribution and self adaptation during
disasters created awareness and forged unity among village community members.

Some Limitations:
Some problems were identified and suggested for correction:
Leadership of union council /ward council members at the time of disasters like flood and cyclone should
be given a formal shape.
Formal and comprehensive training is needed for the village community volunteers and village Defense
party members.
First aid and essential kits such as first aid box, water purifying tablets, oral saline, torch light, battery,
radio, mobile latrines etc. should be provided to the village community club.
There should be small amount of Budget for the village community.

18. THE KOBE EARTHQUAKE (THE GREAT HANSIN AWAJI EARTHQUAKE) AND
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
At 5:46 am on January 17,1995 , the Kobe Earthquake struck Japan. The damage caused by the Kobe
Earthquake was the death and missing toll stands at 6,437 persons and total monetary loss for Hyogo andsurrounding areas stands around 10 trillion yen. More than 80,000 houses were lost and many parts of theurban infrastructure such as express way, bridges, port, and railway facilities were heavily damaged.

Collaborative community development for recovery to implement recovery projects under thecomprehensive Disaster Management strategy for recovery plan and of the importance of social capitalconcept that is the foundation necessary to sustain the community was observed after the Kobe
earthquake. Necessity of social capital and collaborative community development for recovery proved tobe the most effective tool for early socio economic development after the great Hansin Awaji commons”
and indicated that richly embedded urban commons can facilitate active citizenship for community
rebuilding (Maki, Hayashi, Tatsuki & Takashima, (2000). For the 2001 study,11 concrete urban commons
were therefore used in order to estimate the amount of motivation toward community rebuilding. Thus
community participation was during Kobe Earthquake and after the earthquake for massive rebuilding
and for initial settlement in houses. It required community help. Community played a significant role inrecovery from the Great Hanshin Awaji Earthquake.1

a) Kobe City Community Development Ordinance
The Kobe city Community development ordinance was established in 1981, fourteen years before theoccurrence of the earthquake. This ordinance stipulates procedures for community development and the
responsibility of the Mayor, based on experience in community development with the participation ofresidents of Kobe from 1960s to 1970s.This ordinance covered issues like environment, improvement ofjoint facilities including roads and parks gather and establish a community development Conference thiswas the first ordinance in Japan as an advanced ordinance for community development by resident’s
initiative. Based on the ordinance 29 community development conferences were established in the city
before the occurrence of the earthquake in 1995.

b) Procedure for community Development with participation of Residents in the Post Disaster
Restoration Project
Restoration after the Kobe Earthquake began emergency evacuation to elementary schools and Juniorhigh schools and other public facilities because most of the houses were destroyed or burn down in thedisaster area. In the first stage of the restoration project dialogue between the administration started but

the local residents were opposing almost all decision of the administration. Community development
ordinance was implemented through the partnership of the prefecture government and the community
members. Following the past experience, the community development conferences were organized toopen as an accelerator for the understanding the residents’ initiatives and the opinions of the community
about the proposed project implementation by the administration. Therefore community participation wasproved to be the best tool for quick recovery from the earthquake in 1995 and also massive rebuilding andreconstruction was possible due to community initiatives.

C) A Survey on Great Hanshin Awaji Earthquake:
A survey conducted after the Kobe Earthquake illustrates that the 199 grassroots assessment concluded
that ‘community feeling’(MacIver,1924) was closely associated with and could be promoted by a sense ofcommunal

ownershipofthingslikefavoriteneighborhood

landscape,streettrees

andflowers(Tamura,1999. This 1999 grassroots assessment named those communally owned goods as “urban
commons” and indicated that richly embedded urban commons can facilitate active citizenship for
community rebuilding (Maki, Hayashi, Tatsuki & Takashima, (2000). For the 2001 study, 11 concrete
urban commons were therefore used in order to estimate the amount of motivation toward community
rebuilding. Thus community participation was during Kobe Earthquake and after the earthquake formassive rebuilding and for initial settlement in houses, it required community help. Community played asignificant role in recovery from the Great Hanshin Awaji Earthquake.

19. LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE GREAT HANSHIN-AWAJI EARTHQUAKE:
The Great Hanshin- Awaji Earthquake experiences have demonstrated the significance of community
involvement by coordinating individual efforts engaged by each member of the community, mutual help
efforts and support one another including residents , business, volunteers, specialists, municipalities andgovernment efforts a) Individuals ,mutual help efforts and government efforts b) Life , living andcommunity c) Emergency response , relief to recovery and reconstruction and mitigation/preparedness.
Following are the manifold lessons learned from This Great Earthquake:a) Basic elements for developing a culture of prevention:DisasterManagement

requirescoordinatedbyindividuals,

communities,

andgovernments
Importance of residents using their imagination in the event of disaster and not thinking
themselves disaster freeImportance of transmitting the future generations the lessons learned from the pastdisaster, applying those lessons in disaster reduction activities

Disaster information lessens damageb) Life :Accurate assessment of situation and rapid action saves life

Significant results from rescue and firefighting activities by communities and neighbors

Importance of Wide-area disaster relief systems and medical strengthEngaging with other people and cultural activities is a source strengthVoluntary activities among local residents are indispensable to caring for victims andrebuilding their strength for livingImportance of providing emotional support and conscientious care for those requiringsupport

Importance of being prepared for disaster in daily lifeImportance of building collaborative relationships among various people and groups ,including residents, volunteers, specialists and public bodies



Importance of human resource development through the education and training on
disaster reduction and provision of informationc)

Living :Importance of emergencies of sober action that consider other victims

Importance of providing assistance suitable to the needs of disaster stricken areas andlocal communities

Evacuation sites serve as community Centers in disaster stricken areas

Emergencies of new ways of living and community businesses

Coordinating residents, volunteers and government is indispensable to supporting theprocess of living in evacuation centers and emergency housing

Importance of rapid commercial rebuilding initiatives focused on new development

Corporate disaster reduction activities in conjunction with local communities create asociety better able to cope with disasterImportance of further reviewing of ways lessens economic loss related to housingPeople friendly environmentally conscious city planning leads to cities that cope wellwith disastersd) Community:Checking electricity and gas and other actions of individuals to ensure that fire does notoccur help protect the communityQuickly reopening the stores and local businesses supports disaster stricken communities



Importance of coordinated restoration of roads and life lines

Importance of recycling waste products that results from disasters

A community building perspective is essential to secure and reconstructing housing

Housing initiatives are the corner stone of recovery policyEnsuring the safety of one’s home protects one’s family and neighborImportance of advancing resident-led urban housing

Importance of promoting the development of disaster resistant urban infrastructuree) Importance of Disaster Reduction into National and Local Government PolicyImportance of establishing laws and legislation to respond to large-scale natural disasters

Importance of strengthening initial response to address disaster rapidly and appropriatelyImportance of financial coordination by the central government in order to secure the vast
amount of financial resources needed for reconstruction and recovery

Importance of land regional planning incorporating disaster prevention and mitigationand considering natural disaster risk

Reconstruction and mitigation/preparedness are premised on risk assessment.

20. ROLE OF TOKYO FIRE SERVICE IN COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION:
12 million people lives in Japan’s capital Tokyo. In this great city, with its life pattern and structurechanged rapidly, there are a growing number of people and information continuously coming and going.
Amid sophisticated circumstances , disasters in this cosmopolitan city are more overwhelming than before.
This situation has posed new problems to disaster operations and disaster preparedness administration
including fire prevention.

The Tokyo Fire Department promotes its fire administration for public safety in close cooperation with
Tokyo’s local Municipalities, focusing on the following issues:
1. The promotion of Disaster preparedness strategy (including anti earthquake measures) and public
protection against terrorism.
2.

The promotion of elaborately-prepared on-scene emergency operations measures.

3. The reinforcement of an emergency medical services (EMS) system in response to the greaterpublic demands for EMS.
4. The sophistication of EMS and improvement of the life-saving effectiveness in cooperation withcitizens.
5. The promotion of overall building fire protection measures.

6. The promotion of home fire safety for home fire death reduction and public life safety.
7. The promotion of quick and flexible public hearings.
After inauguration in 7th March 1948, the TFD has been working for most of the vast areas of Tokyo(except Higashikurume City and Inagi City) to protect people’s lives and property. The TFD service areas
divided into ten fire districts, which come under the protection of about 18,000 TFD personnel .The
operational personnel stand by for emergencies 24 hours a day. The TFD has been globally contributing
to rescue operations since achievement at toxic gas calamity in Cameron in 1986.
The TFD budget for the fiscal year 2005 is 237.3 billion . This accounts for 4.1% of the Tokyo
Metropolitan Government’s general Budget. The TFD responds to the general incidents caused byradioactive materials, biological agents, hazardous materials and toxic substances. There are also thehazardous material units for chemical substances and chemical emergencies.

The TFD dispatches its units by request to disaster scenes outside its service areas. Following the “ Great
Hanshin- Awaji Earthquake in January 17, 1995, a national rescue system” the emergency Fire Response
Teams” was established in June 1995 to provide effective rescue services in times of major earthquakes
and other serious disasters. There is paramedics assigned to all TFD’s ambulance units .TFD also provide
first Aid Education to the public, special classes have been given in junior and senior high schools forstudents learn to value of life and the importance of cooperation spirit.

The TFD is promoting fire drills with lessons learned from effective initial fire fighting at the time of theGreat Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake. The Department also utilizes the Earthquake damage Prediction
System in line with a seismographic network. For the reinforcement of resources, the Department isfocusing on improving both the fire rescue ‘Task Forces’ provided with heavy apparatus and the longDistance Water Supply pumper provided with a hose laying wagon. Further efforts are being made at
TFD Volunteer training and the earthquake preparedness at home and work with furniture immobilized.
Volunteer fire corps is made up of community members. Together with fire station personnel , they
conduct fire fighting, rescue and first aid activities for both fires and earthquakes. Furthermore, they
instruct residents on fire prevention, basic fire fighting, and rescue and first aid techniques. In this way
Tokyo Fire station has been playing growing role in community mobilization for disaster preparedness,
rescue and recovery at the time of disaster.

21. INAMURA NO HI AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF VILLAGERS:“Inamura no Hi” is based on a historical fact of a massive tsunami disaster caused by the Ansei Nankai
Earthquake in 1854, which attacked the Hiromura, a little village on the Kii Peninsula in western Japan(present name Hirokawa town, under Wakayama Prefecture). Against surging water up to the village,
Hamaguchi Goryo led the villagers, desperately trying to flee from the waves in the darkness, to the highground of the precincts of Hirohachiman Shrine, by setting fire to his precious rice stacks, the year’s
harvest.

Hirokawa township of Wakayama prefecture was severely damaged by earthquake and tsunami in
1854.In order to save the villagers from tsunami Mr. Hamaguchi Goryo had set fire at the rice stackbecause at that time whole village was covered by darkness. His noble effort saved lives of many villagers.
Mr. Goryo had also organized villagers as community and engaged them to construct 5 meter height and
600 meter wide permanent embankment which had been completed after four years. In this way Goryo
had created awareness among the village community about earthquake and tsunami, conducted massive
relief and rehabilitation works and created huge employment for villagers. As a result, Hamaguchi Goryo
has been memorized as ‘Living God’ for his noble works. This is an example of community leadership toreduce disaster risks. Community participation and community leadership is the integral part of disaster
preplanning, preparedness and recovery.

22. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN JAPANAND BANGLADESH:
Japan and Bangladesh are disaster prone countries. Geographic location of Japan is in the circum-Pacificmobile zone, where seismic and volcanic activities occur constantly. The reason for such a large
concentration of volcano activity and earthquake is active colliding at the plate boundaries. Movement of
the plates and movements of the earth’s crust caused by such movements are known as plate Tectonics.
Near the islands of Japan there is a slow but steady northwestward movement of the pacific plate against
the Eurasian plate and westward movement against North American Plate.

Meteorological conditions, the country is subject to frequent natural disasters such as typhoons, torrential
rains and heavy snow. Every year there is a great loss of people’s lives and property in Japan due tonatural disasters. Up until the1950s, numerous large-scale typhoons and earthquakes caused extensive
damage and thousands of casualties. The commonest disaster in Japan is Earthquake. Recent Tohoku orNortheastern Earthquake had claimed lives of 25000 people, missing 40,000people and totally damaged
property worth of US dollar 309 billion.

On the other hand, Bangladesh has a subtropical monsoonal climate characterized by heavy seasonalrainfall, moderately warm temperatures, and high humidity. Natural calamities, such as floods, tropical
cyclones, tornadoes, and tidal bores affect the country almost every year. Bangladesh also is affected bymajor cyclones on average 16 times a decade. Generally each year 18.02% area is flooded. Catastrophic
Cyclone SIDR in 2007 and AILA in 2008 had severely damaged human life, property and infrastructuresin six coastal districts of Bangladesh. Tidal surge in 1970 claimed 4,70000 and 1n 1991 claimed 138000
lives in Bangladesh. Earthquake, tsunami and landslides are also sensitive disaster issues in Bangladesh.
The commonest disaster in Japan is Earthquake. Japan can have up to 5000 earthquakes each year, which
is about 10% out of the total occurred of the world.

Although Japan and Bangladesh are disaster prone countries but the types of disasters are different.
Bangladesh basically faces flood and tornados , which affects 80% percent people. Recently, disasterrisks of sea water level rise in coastal areas, tsunami and earthquake are also coming into consideration.
Severity and intensity of disasters in Japan is more compared to Bangladesh. However, continuous
research and development in disaster reduction and use of modern technologies have helped Japan toovercome natural disasters. The basic scientific and technology policies set a major goal of ensuring thesecurity and people’s livelihoods in Japan.

On the contrary, Bangladesh has small allocation on research and development on disaster mitigation.
Technologically, Bangladesh is not advanced compared to Japan. Last year, Bangladesh procured somesearch and rescue equipments from Japan and other countries. At present Bangladesh has emphasized on
disaster management and mitigation. Actually, Japan is world’s one of the most developed country and on
the other hand Bangladesh is a developing county. Therefore, comparison of Japan and Bangladesh isdifficult. However, there are some similarities in disaster scenario of both the country.

Japan is pioneer in disaster management and disaster risk reduction. It has formulated basic Legal
Frameworks of Disaster Management. In applying to all of the disaster phases of prevention, mitigationand preparedness, emergency response as well as recovery and rehabilitation, relevant laws andregulations were enacted including Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act (1961) which is the cornerstoneof legislation of disaster management which set out the basic for measures for disaster risk reduction,
emergency response, post-disaster recovery and reconstruction. It was formulated in 1961, after thehappening of Typhoon Ise-wan in 1959 that caused more than 5,000 fatalities. The other relevant acts
associated with disaster countermeasures Basic Act (1961); Erosion Control Act (1897), Disaster Relief

Act (1947), Building Standard Law (1950. These laws are to clearly define the responsibilities of thenational and local governments and other public organizations to take emergency measures on rivermanagement, flood and erosion control, landslide prevention, earthquake and tsunami risk reduction
measures.

In Bangladesh to manage the paradigm shift in disaster management, a disaster management regulative
framework is established under which the Bangladesh Disaster Management Framework is implemented,
and in which work of Ministries, Departments, NGOs and civil society are undertaken. Earlier,
Government of Bangladesh emphasized on relief rather than disaster preparedness planning and disasterrisk reduction. After the adoption of Hyogo Framework of Action in 2001, Bangladesh has adopted
comprehensive disaster management program. However, the Disaster Management Act which creates thelegislative framework under which disaster risk reduction and emergency response management isundertaken in Bangladesh, yet to promulgate in the Parliament and National Disaster Management Policy
is yet to be adopted.

Japan had enacted “Building Standard Law 1950” and houses, shopping malls and high rise buildings areconstructed by strictly following building code. In Japan, old buildings are retrofitted and new buildings
are constructed with proper soil test, earthquake preventive structural designs. As a result, after 9.0
magnitude earthquake, incidents of building collapse and death related to building collapse is almost nil.
Unfortunately, in Bangladesh, Building Code has been formulated in 2006 but it has not been
implemented. Old buildings, Key point installations, schools and hospitals are not retrofitted. Therefore,
any occurrence of severe earthquake will cause huge loss of lives and property.

The National budget for disaster management in Japan is approximately 4.5 trillion yen (average annual
budget from 1955 to 2004), accounting for approximately 5% of the total amount of budget for generalaccounts. The percentage for each field is a) Scientific Technology Research 1.3% b) Disaster prevention
and preparedness, 23.6% c) National Land Conservation 48.7% d) Disaster Recovery and Rehabilitation,
26.4%. This year after Great Tohoku Earthquake, Government of Japan allocated 63 trillion yen for
rescue, relief and rehabilitation. (Source: internet). On the contrary, Bangladesh has been allocating 500
million US dollars in disaster management and food Ministry in yearly budget, of which a small amountof budget is used for strengthening disaster management system. At present, a comprehensive disastermanagement project has been undertaken to strengthen the National Disaster Management System.

In Japan there are many public and private organizations, local government - prefecture, municipality
have been working actively for disaster management training, preparedness, planning , recovery andrescue. On contrast, in Bangladesh, Disaster Management Division, Directorate of Relief, Disaster
Management Bureau, Bangladesh Armed Forces, Fire Service, District, sub-district and municipal bodies
are working at the time of disasters. Measures on disaster drills and training are not adequate to face
future challenges of disasters. However, Government has attached highest priority on Disastermanagement. Japan’s vast experience on disaster management and disaster risk reduction can be
replicated in Disaster Management system in Bangladesh

Like Japanese Red Cross and Fire Service, Bangladesh Red Crescent Society and Bangladesh Fire
Service have been working round the clock for disaster reduction and carried out search, rescue andrecovery at the time of disasters. Again, budget and necessary modern equipments are not sufficient fordisaster prevention in Bangladesh. Bangladesh has limited resources. So, even after having government’s
willingness, sufficient budgetary allocation and modern search and rescue equipments could not beprovided to these organizations. In this sector, Japanese Assistance is required.

Bangladesh has mountains and hills in the eastern part of the country. However, incidents of landslide andnumber of death people are not minimal. There is no act or regulation on landslides control and researchon landslides is not adequate. In contrast, Japan has several institutes for landslide research andmanagement. Japan has been using modern technologies for preventive landslides. Volcano is anothermajor disaster in Japan, there is 108 active volcanoes. Japan has introduced new technology for managing
debris fall and volcanic eruption ash fall and mud fall. At present Japan has been assisting Nepal,
Australia, Philippines and Indonesia on Volcano management and SABO system.

On community mobilization Japan has set best example in the world from the point view of disastermanagement. Japan currently, conducting Fire fighting train/drills exercises for community volunteers,
drills for community members and school children, School Earthquake Safety Initiatives to make schools
safe against earthquakes and build disaster- resilient communities through self-help, cooperation andeducation. The project includes retrofitting of school building in a participatory way with the involvementof local communities, local governments and resource institutions, trainings on safer construction
practices to technicians, disaster education in school and communities.

After the Great Hanshin –Awaji Earthquake in 1995, Local government has involved local communities
for reconstruction and recovery process. Opinion of stakeholders and local community had been taken

into consideration. Consultants had consulted local community for local development. Local Government
had attached highest priority on the community involvement. Local coping technologies are considered in
the management of disaster reduction which actually originated from the good practices of community.
Community volunteers have played significant role in the early recovery process from the Great HanshinAwaji Earthquake. Recently, occurred 3/11 Tohoku Earthquake followed by devastating tsunami, hascompletely destroyed Sanriku, Miyagi prefecture, Sendai, Fukushima areas. In these affected areas local
community members and community volunteers have been working side by side the Self Defense Armyof Japan and Local Government. Role of the community considered to be the most important factor to
overcome disaster situation in Japan.

In Bangladesh, local community members play significant role for disaster risk reduction and disastermanagement. There are approximately 47000 community volunteers under the Cyclone preparedness
program. Red-Crescent Society of Bangladesh has been trained up these volunteers for disaster
preparedness. They plays active role for issuing early warning among the community and rescue themfrom disasters. Local or indigenous coping mechanism to mitigate disaster risk has also been proveneffective. Indigenous coping mechanism learned from the community members. Therefore, this nonstructural disaster mitigation process-awareness creation among community members, drills and exercises
about disaster prevention is less costly. In community mobilization and participation Bangladesh has alsoachieved success. However, in Bangladesh disaster reduction institutions are not adequate like Japan. In
this regard Japanese technique of community participation can be replicated.

Finally, In Japan, there are many public and private organizations for disaster risk reduction. Especially,
there are many museums on the disasters- Disaster Reduction and Human Renovation Institutions Kobe,
Rokko Mountains Landslides Museum, Sakurajima Volcano and SABO center, Nojima Faults Museum
etc. Visitors from community and school children are regularly visiting these museums to know about thedevastation of disasters and the ways to protect from disasters like tsunami, earthquake, flood, typhoons.
Unfortunately, being a disaster prone country, Bangladesh has no such disaster related museums, wherefrom community members and school children can gain practical experience about disasters like flood,
cyclone, tidal surge, and learn the lessons to protect them from disasters. Although, comparison between
Japan and Bangladesh regarding disaster management and disaster reduction and present status on
disaster is unrealistic, even there are many lessons can be learned from Japan. People’s adaptability withdisasters in Japan and Bangladesh is highly commendable.

23. COMMUNITY AND LOCAL INVOLVEMENT:
It is necessary to engage local government and community in disaster risk mitigation. If local stakeholders
are not engaged in the disaster risk mitigation design, implementation and management of disaster risk
reduction then the resulting policies, strategies and plans have limited chance to suit with the local
conditions.

Similarly, if local community and organizations are not considered as stakeholders in the management offacilities and infrastructure then there is little chance to be implemented. For example, if local community
is not involved in post disaster situation in Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, Kobe, Japan in 1995 smooth
recovery and reconstruction of the total area would not have been possible.

Cost of disaster risk reduction can be reduced to a great extent if the local community is involved indecision making process with reconstruction and rebuilding and mobilization of local resources,
capabilities, knowledge and expertise. The potentiality of the community is proven great at the time ofdisaster. Engagement of local community contributes to building social capital, raises awareness of
disaster risk and strengthens local capacities to address a wide range of development issue

24. COMMUNITY BASED DISASTER MANAGEMENT
The concept of BDM or community Based Disaster Management emphasizes that through capacity
building community can be better prepared to face future disaster situations and manage their risks. The
concept of CBDM recognizes that the community applied top down initiatives fail to address specificlocal needs of a given community , it fail to heed local knowledge or take into account available resources
and capacities that exists within the community. The aim of developing a training curriculum andguidelines foe CBDM was primarily encourage the paradigm shift to change the focus of disastermanagers to look at communities as active partners rather than helpless victims:; the shift from relief tomitigation. Another aim was to make the training available at low cost , in local languages to disastermanagers at grassroots level in south east Asia. It is a very effective program to train up and integrate thecommunity activities at the disasters.

a) Sustainability in Community Based Disaster Management
In the Year 2002, UNCRD launched a three-year project on titled “Sustainability in Community Based
Disaster Management”, to study the effectiveness of the grass - root projects and to suggest policy input
for sustainability, which will be useful for the different communities to take future actions. This was tohelp to understand the gaps in the community initiatives, and to take corrective actions in future. In orderto identify the key factors for successful CBDM, six case studies were chosen in the Asian region
targeting three specific hazards: Cyclones (India and the Philippines),earthquakes (Indonesia and
Nepal)and floods(Bangladesh and Cambodia). At first, field surveys were carried out and best practices
from the case study countries were documented. Based on the analysis of these cases studies, overall
framework of action for the sustainability of community based disaster management was prepared.
Generic and specific guidelines were developed and field experimentations and testing were made for
specific hazards in selected case study countries. From the three-years study, followings were found as
key factors for enhancing sustainability:- The existence of “culture of coping with crisis” and “ culture of disaster reduction” exist- Risk assessment process involves participation of people and incorporating their perception ofvulnerability and capacity- Community and supporting agencies share common motivation and ownership for the initiation andsustainability of CBDM
- Genuine people’s participation within capacity building objectives, with specific focus on sectoral
groups like women, elderly, children and ethnic minorities- Well-delivered training inputs in accordance with the objectives of the project and the needs of thecommunity for training- Wider stakeholder's involvement and participation- Accumulation of physical, technological and economic assets to reduce hazards and vulnerability- Integration of these projects into regular development planning and budgeting to ensure sustainabilityb)Role of United Nations on Disaster Prevention: Community Based Disaster Prevention Projects
undertaken by UNCRD:

1.1Earthquake Safety Initiative through a project “Reducing Vulnerability of School Children to
Earthquakes:
The United Nations Centre for Regional Development (UNCRD) is, currently, promoting School
Earthquake Safety Initiative through a project “Reducing Vulnerability of School Children to Earthquakes”
jointly with UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) in Asia-Pacific region. The
project aims to make schools safe against earthquakes and build disaster- resilient communities throughself-help, cooperation and education. The project includes retrofitting of school building in a participatory
way with the involvement of local communities, local governments and resource institutions, trainings on
safer construction practices to technicians, disaster education in school and communities. These activities

are carried out in Fiji Islands, India, Indonesia and Uzbekistan as demonstration cases which will bedisseminated throughout the respective geographical regions.

1.2There are three major aspects of the community empowerment in earthquake disaster risk
management through this initiative:
Seismic safety of school buildings: The projects include seismic vulnerability analysis of some selectedschools in a project city of each country and retrofitting of some of them which cover prominent
construction typology in the region. This leads to development of country specific guidelines on theearthquake safe construction which incorporates solutions to the practical problems experienced school
retrofitting.
Capacity building of communities: Retrofitting of schools in communities serves as a demonstration ofproper earthquake technology to them. Masons in the communities get on-job training during theretrofitting of schools. In addition, technicians in each project cities get trainings on earthquake designand construction of houses. Consideration is given to the local practice, material availability, indigenous
knowledge and affordability in trainings on earthquake technology.
Disaster education and awareness: The project includes development and wide distribution of
educational booklets, posters and guidebook on teachers training and students’ drills for earthquake
disaster preparedness and response. The guidebooks get verification and updated through trainings andmock drills. The projects also develops an interactive educational tool for awareness raising onearthquake disaster and simple seismic risk assessment of buildings aiming to motivate households forplanning seismic upgrading of their houses. It was learned from earlier programs of UNCRD that theprocess of making safer schools can be used as an entry points to the communities at risk to facilitate
implementation of a training and capacity -building program for earthquake disaster mitigation
technology besides its prime objective of ensuring the safety of school children against future earthquakes.
It is achieved by demonstrating how schools can be used as community centres for earthquake disasterprevention and mitigation. Locally applicable and affordable earthquake-safer construction technology istransferred to these communities.

1.3Lessons Learn from the case study conducted by UNCRD on Empowering Community:
In regards to the issue of engaging and empowering communities for sustainable disaster risk
management, followings are the major lessons:
1. Community empowerment and communication help to achieve sustainability in CBDM
2. A holistic secure-livelihood approach enhances sustainability
3. Community based action plans and training improves community's problem solving skills.

4. Because disasters are unpredictable, it is important to maintain the projects and people's awareness of
disasters.
5. Transparency of activities and dissemination of knowledge and information encourage people's
participation in activities.
6. CBDM efforts need stable financial resources.
7. 'What is accepted by the community' is more important than 'what is necessary'
8. Institutionalizing the community and the private sectors can result in more sustainable disastermanagement programs.

25. SOME CASE STUDIES ON COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION:a)Case Study in Australia
A recent case study in Australia found that the extent of commitment by local governments to take actions
depends on emergency managers making the right choices about citizens or community involvement inplanning risk reduction processes. This can act as the real driving force for officials to involve community.
Key decisions include
Objectives to be achieved by involving citizens
Areas in planning process where and when citizens participate
Which citizens to include
Techniques to use in order to obtain citizen input
Information that is to be provided to citizens
Basically disasters considered as an opportunities for change and development. Women are participating
actively in rehabilitation and reconstruction around the world. Networks of Networks are increasingly
needed to among organizations and community.

b)Case study: Philippines
In the Philippines , the citizens Disaster Response Network(CDRN) is a national network of 14 NGOs
that promotes community Based disaster preparedness work. Since its inception in the early 1980s it has
conducted campaign and advocacy work to mitigate the impacts of disaster . By working together withthe communities CDRN has developed strategies to enhance people’s capacities through community
organizing , forming village-level disaster response committees, developing local early warning systems ,organizing local rescue teams and diversifying local resources of livelihoods. Receiving little external
support from donor agencies , it has reached hundreds of villages and initiated community Basedmitigation initiatives.

c)Case Study : South Asian Countries(Nepal, India ,Pakistan and Sri Lanka ,Bangladesh)
Livelihood Options for Disaster Risk Reduction that proceeds from the recognition of the success of
Duryog Nivaran-the South Asian Network for Disaster Mitigation, encouraged millions of people ofSouth Asia living with disaster risks in everyday life to copy the project. It is therefore only strengthening
livelihoods and by building more effective coping capacities within individual communities that a solid
foundation for disaster mitigation can be created. The project is fundamentally community-based with theintention of identifying crucial linkages of livelihoods and the related option which have the potential toreduce the disaster risks. This project was funded by the DFID.

The Hyogo Framework for action on disaster management has formulated the disaster mitigation
activities among the communities according to the experience gained from the Great Hanshin Awaji
Earthquake in 1995. The Kobe experience is one of the best example of community mobilization to
mitigate the sufferings of the victims as well as involving the community with the decision making
process and in the rebuilding and reconstruction process. Basically in Japan, local community
organizations with responsibility for disaster preparedness cover half the population of the country.

26. LESSONS LEARNED FROM JAPAN:
I gained versatile knowledge about disasters like tsunami , earthquake, flood, landslides, volcanoes fromdifferent disaster related public and private organizations of Japan through intensive field visits todifferent disaster related organizations. Disaster preparedness planning, projection of future disasters andthe way to overcome these disasters with minimum loss of lives and properties and development ofmodern technologies to underline the causes of disasters have been widely practiced in Japan. Despite
having such best precautions, modern early warning systems, equipments, disaster drills. Recently
occurred disaster on 11March2011 had been devastating. It killed 17500 people officially and missing
about 40,000 people and preliminary loss of properties estimated to $310 billion dollars. However, thedisaster management practice in Japan is highly commendable. Following are the major experiences andlessons I learned from the ADRC, Visiting Researcher Program:To minimize the extent of damage from disasters, it is important for self help, mutual help andneighbors help. Then aid from government and public organizations comes.



There should be coordination with government, non government organizations, local government
and municipal bodies.



Stock and storage of emergency goods and services and first aid medical services should be
prompt to disaster affected areas and necessary food and relief materials should be dispatch assoon as possible to the affected people.



Community based disaster prevention culture lead by community members and civil society canplay a vital role for disaster mitigation.

Conducting regular drills/training and simulation is effective to reduce disaster related deaths.

“Disaster Risk Reduction begins at school” It will be necessary to inform and ensure participationof communities, government and individuals to ensure that disaster risk reduction is fully
integrated in school curricula in high disaster risk countries and that school building are build andretrofitted to withstand natural hazards.

The major elements of effective school seismic safety programs and the basic principles of
constructing retrofitted and earthquake resistant school building , learned from Japan.
Prioritize school buildings to be retrofitted.

Promote earthquake resistant evaluation of school buildings.

Develop the plan for earthquake-proof school buildings.

Disclose the results of the earthquake resistant evolution and the plan for promoting
earthquake-proof school buildings.

Check and take measures for earthquake proof non-structural elements.



School safety is everybody’s business to save our children. Let us make our school buildings
earthquake resistant and promote disaster risk education.

(1) Disaster Risk Reduction Approach:
Basically “Disaster Risk Reduction training begins at school”. It is necessary to inform and mobilize
governments, communities and individuals to ensure that disaster risk reduction is fully integrated into
school curricula in high risk countries and that school buildings are built and retrofitted to withstandnatural hazards.
From Japan I learned the major elements of effective school seismic safety programs and the basic
principles of earthquake –resistant school buildings. The following are the basic principles, I observed:1. Prioritize school buildings to be retrofitted.
2. Promote earthquake resistance and evaluation of school buildings
3. Develop the plan for earthquake – proof school buildings
4. Disclose the result of the earthquake resistance evolution and the plan for promoting earthquakeproof school buildings
5. Check and take measures for earthquake proof non-structural elements
The conclusion that aroused was that “School Safety is everybody’s business to save our children”.
Therefore, there every country should make school buildings earthquake resistant and promote disasterrisk education.

(2) Tools for Disaster Risk Reduction:
Emergency drills are most effective tools to minimize the loss of lives and properties during disasters.
The government of Japan and its local governments have focused on the importance of the emergency
drills conducting everywhere of the country to make people conscious about disasters. “What was heard
can be forgotten, what was watched can be learned, and what was performed can be understood.” One of
the most interesting drills is Card Game.
The following are the merits of game;
1. Positive participation can be expected because of the attitude towards the word “game” although it
is not merely play.
2. Participants can find their lack of knowledge or problems for themselves during the game3. Learning about feelings
4. Participants can notice other people’s ways of thinking.
5. Participants can think about what issues in real disaster prevention are represented by the rules of
the game.
It is true that, active participation, sharing the important information and responsibility from as many
sectors of the community as possible can reduce the disaster risk at all level(3) Disaster Prevention Activity in the Community of Tokyo, Japan:
Japan consists of 46 prefectures and the population of Japan is approximately 122,700,000. The
population of Tokyo Metropolitan city is about 13,043,441 and it consists of 23 districts and 49 cities.
The population of that Ota district is 693,393.
Community is actively participating in the disaster prevention community activities. Around 1800
families and 3600 peoples are engaged in the field of disaster prevention. People think that disasterprevention is the person’s bonds. The motto of that community is “Make a town a happy town, Happy
town against disaster.” They do experiment of fire drill every month. They organized one disasterprevention music band and they released a CD last year concerning about disaster prevention.

(4) The Volcanic geology, and volcano education Center, Tokyo:
Japan’s geographic location is at the ‘Ring of Fire’. There are many active Volcanoes in Japan. Heredetail research on Volcano has been conducted. In the center simulation/Experiments like:
1. Lava dome experiments using mayonnaise.
2. Kitchen volcano experiments

3. Experiment to prove smooth Pyroclastic flows etc. has been conducted for the trainees to make themaware of the volcano disaster.
In fact, I gained the knowledge that –“transmitting experience of volcanic disaster is difficult and also
facing volcanic disaster without knowledge of eruption is dangerous.

(5) Building Resilient Culture to Prevent the Large scale Earthquake, National Museum of
Ethnology, Wakayama Prefecture:
The activities of voluntary Associations in Kushimoto –cho of Wakayama Prefecture of Japan on the
Building Resilient Culture to large scale Earthquake is a glaring example of community involvement inpreventing disasters. The information on the community activities on disasters were disseminated by
ISAO HAYASHI, National Museum of Ethnology has opened my window of knowledge community
mobilization on disasters prevention.
The followings are the lessons I learned from the community activities of Wakayama Prefecture :1. Disaster education can facilitate people to build awareness of contemporary threats.
2. In the areas where large scale disasters are expected in near future, disaster education to school
children is essential.
3. Methodology is needed to enhance their awareness of disaster risk and to develop their ability tocope with and to respond disasters correctly.
4. Whilst the education system is an excellent way to promote disaster reduction.
5. Booklets, Maps, Sign Plates, those are valuable of the communication of information both students
and others.
Disaster education at school should be integrated into community based disaster reduction and there is,therefore also a need for a proliferation of initiatives in community based disaster reduction beyond
schools.

(6) The Preventive Measures for Sediment Disaster:
Japan is situated at the active Volcano Zone in Asia. I knew about the proper location or places
prone to sediment of disaster occur in Japan. I gained the knowledge about 3 pillars of the sedimentdisaster counter measures. These are:
1. Protecting life and Property-Using hard ware Measures (Soil erosion control project, landslide
prevention, Steep slope collapse prevention works)
2. Protecting life-using software Measures (preparing hazard Map, and preparing warning system)
3. Controlling land development-Controlling new residential development

I watched the erosion control facilities and knew about the History of sediment related disaster andconcerned legislation. I found that, the landslide prevention and Slope failure prevention is the main
roles of national and prefectural government in sedimentation disaster reduction. At the end , I
overviewed a hazard map about sediment related disaster.

(7) Landside Museum at NIGAWA-YURINO-Area:
This area was suffered by the worst mass movement disaster caused by the Great Hanshin Awaji
earthquake. I gained information about the Landslide Museum. The entire model about preventive
landslide in the museum was very informative.
I learned that the museum is very effective for raising public awareness on the landslide disaster. If we
can construct this kind of museum in my country, it would be great help to enhance our people’sknowledge on disaster especially in the landslide. Bangladesh is also the landslides prone countries. So I
was interested to understand Japanese model which I will prefer to use in my country also.

I was informed that when earthquake occurred, a100m-wide, 100-long hillside on the right bank of the
NIGAWA River Collapsed. Approximately 100,000m of displaced soil crushed 13 houses and blocked
the Nigawa River, killing 34 people. An emergency project for landslide rehabilitation was planned andinitiated in the after effects of the earthquake. The project was completed in 1997.

I realized that if we want to live a natural environment, we need to understand the devastating power ofnature and learn how to protect ourselves from natural disaster by visiting land slide project in Kobe,
Japan.

(8) The Significance and Necessity of Disaster Education at Universities in Japan:
Universities in Japan are jointly started the Interdisciplinary Education study system. A variety oflectures are provided in an interfaculty–style study system that involves participation from all faculties in
the University. I knew the detail the matter about the Disaster Management and Social Service Section. It
is the program of the practical science education that regards the student as the subject. It is aparticipatory planning type program for both students and the citizens. It can increase expertise about thedisaster management through mutual education between the University and the local region. Students
learned by doing practical exercise like on disasters such as earthquake, tsunami, flood and typhoon, fireand so on. Community Paramedic Training, Teaching materials and Classes are offered at local school etc.
They started the “mutual Education” between the three universities. The main objective of mutual
education is that they can use that expertise and can develop a system for rapid, response and mutual help

in times of disasters. It can be possible for remote communication system and sharing the information by
web GIS based system also. The conclusion was that the disaster management and social service section,
the institute for interdisciplinary education of Kobe Gakuin university and the three universities
collaboration project also challenging program to run successfully. In spite of this they have to recognize
the activities about win-win business and the challenges of universities as well. This is one of the best
ways to involve community to mitigate disaster risk.

(9) The Disaster prevention and evacuation training at MAIKO High School:
In Kobe, Japan, before the great Kobe earthquake, most of the people did not realized the necessity ofdisaster mitigation activities. Based on the lesson learned from Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake, thedisaster and mitigation course applied in this school. Students are learning so many contents about
disaster preparedness, Prevention, Mitigation and so on.
The School is divided into 4 levels;
1. Elementary School
2. Junior High School
3. Senior High School
4. University

Students work as local and international volunteer at the time of disaster. They can learn Hazard
mapping, Emergency Reaction, Social background and exchange the experience with other countries in
the field of disaster management.
Learned from the past fact and experience, it will be very important for learning about disaster.
After occurring disaster, we should follow below formula:
1. Protect of our own life2.

Education to be a superior

3. Help others just after we are safe in a disaster4. To visit the affected area to support them
5. Supports the survivors’ far way
6. Participate daily in the society
The Japanese model of disaster risk reduction is very helpful for future activities.

(10) Involvement of Children to Learn Disaster:
The children have a great opportunity to disseminate disaster drills techniques to their parents by telling
about the drill to their parents. They can watch and realize the subject matter on disaster training. Theyget chance to take special course of fire training from Kobe Fire Academy monthly drills. They can gain
the strong motivation to learn about disaster mitigation. Children visits NAGATA ward to gather
experience, to learn what really happened at the time disaster.

(11) The Great Hanshin –Awaji Earthquake Memorial DRI Museum:This museum built in memory of the deceased and victims of the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake.
Actually the Library is very informative and touchable also. The DRI library collects and preserves many
materials related to the Great Hanshin –Awaji Earthquake and disaster reduction. Firstly, the tremendous
destructive power of earthquakes is portrayed using sound and dramatic images on a big screen. It mademe very gloomy. In fact, it demonstrates the problems faced by Japanese people during the recovery andreconstruction process after the earthquake up to present day. Personally, I must appreciate the courage
and morale of Japanese people, putting their hard labor, had overcome the disaster. I knew the approaches
to disaster prevention and reduction by citizens and international disaster reduction organizations. At thelast movement of my visit, I saw the animation film. That film was a love of “life” and the courage to live
depicted through the story “the fall of Freddy the leaf” It is the truth of life. I was impressed to see themanagement of the museum at Kobe, Japan.

(12) Disaster Management and Business continuity plan:
The objective of the Business continuity plan by Tokyo Marine Risk Consulting Company Limited is toexplain the role of insurance company in order to recover from any disaster related incidents by theaffected industrial and business enterprises. After the Great Hanshin Awaji, litigation started with theindustrial enterprise owners and insurance company. Because, insurance company was suppose to coverfire related incidents. However, at that earthquake, fire occurred after one day of the earthquake. So,
debate started between insurance company and insurance claimer, which portion will be covered, whether
earthquake or fire. At last it was settled at the Supreme Court.

Besides this, Cabinet Office of Japan has issued an directive to Business organizations to incorporate therisk of earthquake, Tsunami etc in their Business plan so that even at the time of disasters, industrial units
and business firms can continue supply chain of their products in home and abroad. These firms alsoneeded to come under insurance coverage and pay insurance premium. Gradually, big firms areincorporating Business continuity plan in their organizations. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan ismonitoring the issue. Actually this issue is proved very urgent even at the time of The Great Tohoku
Earthquake of 11 March2011 to cover the loss of lives and properties of people.

(13) “Inamura-no-Hi’ and Tsunami Education Center, Wakayama:
Tsunami Education center is located at Wakayama prefecture and far away from Kobe. I visited theTsunami affected village in 1854 where Mr. Hamaguchi Goryo constructed 5m high and 20m at thebottom and 600m long seawall along the stone. Seawall originally constructed by a local lord Hatakeyama.
The new seawall was completed in December 1854. He spent his own money 94 kan and 353.79kg
monme of silver which is equivalent to 1,572 ryo: gold piece.
Mr. Hamaguchio hired 56,736 (man day) villagers to prevent the village from losing its township. Also
his initiative had created employment for the tsunami affected village. On the December 14,1938 thetomb of Mr. Goryo and the seawall registered national monuments. The “Inamura-no Hi” based on true
story, Mr. Goryo set fire to stacks of “Inamura”(Rice Sheaves) to use as landmarks and help him guidethe villagers to a safe place, just before the Tsunami hit the village on 1920.His effort saved many lives ofthe village Inamura. After visiting Tsunami seawall,
Tsunami Education Center, Wakayama:
I visited the Tsunami Education center where I learnt about the true story of ‘Fire of rice sheaves’ andmechanism of Tsunami following big earthquake to prevent victims of Tsunami in future. This is one of
the best practical experiences I gained.

(14) Japanese Red Cross Office, Tokyo:
I learned about the operational procedure of the organization and also visited the warehouse of the Red
Cross. National Headquarter of Japanese Red Cross located at Tokyo. It has 47 Chapters and 92 Red
Cross Hospitals, 64 Blood Centers and approximately 59 thousand paid staff. The Japanese Red Cross
operates at local, regional and international levels at the time of emergency and Disasters. It has strong
network all over Japan and big ware house.

(15) NHK National Broadcasting Authority, Japan:
NHK has been serving Japan by collecting rare documents and pictures and video footage of disasters
and accidents. NHK by using modern studio and most sophisticated cameras and equipments have madethe organization a symbol of reliability. NHK broadcasting stations throughout the country aim to
broadcast programs that are more attractive and easily understood by the viewers. NHK has been putting
special importance to disaster related news, early warning on tsunami, earthquake and volcanoes.
Japanese media played significant role in recent 3/11 earth quake and tsunami which caused huge loss of
lives and properties of the people of northeast part of Japan.

(16) Cabinet Office of Japan Tokyo:
Japan is a disaster prone country. Every year there is a great loss of people’s lives and properties in Japandue to the Natural Disasters. Along with a series of reforms of the central Government of Japan, It hascreated the posts of State Minister for Disaster Management, appointed a Deputy Cabinet Chief Secretaryand established the Cabinet information Collection Center. The Cabinet Office has a supporting role
regarding disaster management matters. The Cabinet office has developed the Central Disastermanagement Communication systems involving government offices and public Corporations via hot line.

(17) Japan Meteorological Society Tokyo:
The Meteorological Society of Japan at the time of disasters play key role in issuing early warning
regarding earthquake, tsunami ,volcanoes, landslides and floods.. Japan Meteorological Agency has been
promptly issues warnings and information on earthquakes and Tsunamis to mitigate the disasters andprotect lives and properties. In the event of large scale earthquake in ocean areas JMA announces
estimated Tsunami heights and their arrival times in advance which can be regarded as Tsunami warnings
and Advisories. In the event of earthquakes, JMA announces hypocenter magnitude and where strong
shaking has been felt which can be called as Earthquake Information.

(18) Disaster Management of Energy Supplies at Osaka Gas Company Limited:
I joined one lecture on Disaster Management of Energy Supplies at Osaka Gas Company Limited. The
company Executive and Technical Experts demonstrated us how Osaka Gas Engineering Company has
constructed the main Building of the company on base isolater which is earthquake resistant. Also theCompany has been Supplying Gas to the whole prefectures area among 6.63 million Households. Afterthe Great Hanshin-Awaji (Kobe) Earthquake fire had been escalated due to gas line damage and it had
taken many valuable lives and properties of prefectures. On the basis of the past experience company has
introduced disaster preventive city gas production and new supply connections,/networks, monitoring andcontrol system, which is safe and earthquake proof.

(19) The Role of Community Radio Broadcasting by FM-Y in Japan:
Community Radio plays a significant role at the time of Disasters in Japan. The concept of community
Radio in Japan was replicated in Indonesia and other places of the world. Community volunteers operate
this radio at the time of emergency and helps people to safe their life and properties.

(20) The Emergency Disaster Management by Hyogo Prefectural Emergency Management
Training Centre, Miki City.

This Emergency Disaster Management center provides training facilities to the emergency disastermanagement volunteers. For whole year training schedules and training programs are prepared forvolunteers. Fire drill exercises are also organized on regular basis. This center is situated in the heart ofMiki City. The Environment has also been protected here. A modern stadium has been constructed with
Helipad so that in the time of emergency relief goods can be dispatched to the affected people withinshortest possible period. At the time of emergency affected people will be given temporary shelter at thestadium located here.

(21) Tsukuba University Graduate School of World Heritage Studies:This center provides specialized higher education and research facilities to the students of different
countries to preserve the cultural heritage of the world. The graduate school focused on “Disaster
Prevention and Monitoring of Cultural Heritage Properties in Asia. The main theme of the center isDisaster Awareness, Disaster Prevention and Monitoring of Cultural Heritage Properties in Asia. The
School has emphasized on “City, Region, Home, Individual role =Improvement of the disaster responsive
capability in the Region which would help to preserve endangered Cultural properties from disasters.”
UNESCO and Government of Japan have been providing fund to protect cultural heritage.

(22) National Institute for Earth Science and Seismic Disaster Prevention:
In Japan intensive research and development programs have been carried out for developing modern
equipments to prevent disasters. Here the “ Tsukuba Shaking Table for Earthquake Resistant Building.”
has been developed to construct earthquake resistant houses.25. The “Geographical Survey institute,
Tsukuba: Geographic survey has been conducted from this institute for Japan. It conducts survey throughsatellite and exchange information regarding earthquake, tsunami, volcanoes, typhoon , and landslide etc
disasters with other counties. Regular monitoring of different disasters has been going on here.
“The Science Museum of Map and Survey in Japan” where knowledge about the principles, mechanism,
the History and New Technology for Map and Survey has been disseminated. The relationship between
human life, Map and Survey is close and interrelated.

(23) The “Kaeru Caravan”:
I learned many ideas about disaster risk management. I participated in Blanket Stretcher Time Trial .I
enjoyed lot and learned jack lifting game, Water fire extinguisher target practice game, Kaekko Bazaar
game, and paper dish making game. In fact, that “Kaeru Caravan” was amazing to learn about how to
reduction the risk of disaster.

(24) Drainage and Flood management system, Osaka:
I visited several Drainage Pumping Stations like:- Tohin Drainage Pumping Station ( capacity of water
pumping 72m3 per second ), Matsushima Drainage Pumping Station (capacity of water pumping
91m3/second ) and Koyagawa Drainage Pumping Station,(pumping capacity 25m3/second).
I visited in the Samondo River; Shoge River and Tomimatsu River and observed the channel
improvement of River. I saw the operation procedure of the Shoge River water Gate system.
Finally, I visited the River Improvement of the area near to Takahashi bridge. This visit has given me an
opportunity to know about the modern flood control, river management and drainage system of Osaka
prefecture.

(25) Department of Urban and Public Works, Osaka:
I learned about the disaster-prevention measures by Osaka prefectural Government especially aboutmeasures against earthquakes and tsunami undertaken by department of Urban and Public Works.
I learned there about
1. Earthquake expected to happen and anticipated damage
2. Efforts by department of Urban and public works of Osaka Prefectural Government
3. Structure of Department of Urban and public works at the time of emergency such as earthquakehits.
I knew, If major earthquake hits directly under a city, huge damage is expected to occur against public
transportation, utilities, and telecommunications and also possible collapses of many houses may cause
many casualties.
There was threadbare discussion about the dangerous situation during tsunami. A tsunami is likely tohappen, and estimated to cause a mass damage to the coastal area. Also, long quakes are likely to cause
damage to bridges and high-rise buildings. Further, tsunami may go upstream on rivers, and it may cause
damage at upper areas of the rivers.

I understood the efforts of Department of Urban and Public Works. The following works are done by that
Department like:

Seismic reinforcement



Heightening tide embankment, disaster prevention information system, remote monitoring/control of water gates.

Training for initial reaction, emergency assembly practice, training for collaboration with related
agencies.

Support for preparing hazard maps.

The main theme of disaster prevention activity is “Disaster Prevention starts from protecting you andyour families’ live.”
I saw the video movie about tsunami and typhoon. It was really very informative. We also visited tomodel exhibition Section over there. I saw the picture that Osaka city situated in below the sea levelwith potential risks. In Osaka Prefecture, there are approximately 40 K.M. square of areas below sea
level, which is home to approximately 1.08 million people vulnerable to tsunami. However, disaster
preparedness is excellent.
I gained the knowledge that how to protect our live from Tsunami disaster. “Correct the knowledge
and appropriate actions can save our life and our family in an emergency”.

(26) Effective Utilization of local resources for the earthquake learning:
A session on “Transfer the lessons learned through the great Hanshin Awaji Earthquake, Effective
Utilization of local resources for the earthquake learning”. Conducted to understand the necessity of pastdisaster situation and experience sharing from victims. Futaba Elementary School is now using Local
Community Center. Non –Profit Organization (NPO), Futaba supported by community. Its vision is toutilize local resource, characteristics, succeed local cultures, make active community, effective utilizationof abolished Futaba Elementary school, and provide projects for revitalizing the local community.

(27) Nojima Fault:
Nojima Fault Preservation Museum is located in Awaji city of Awaji Island. It is near the northwest coastof the island, and is located about 10 km southwest of the north end of the island.

The Great Hanshin Earthquake had occurred at 5:46 a.m. on January 17th, 1995. It caused considerable
damage mainly in the south part of Hyogo Prefecture. The earthquake caused 6,434 deaths and injured
43,792 people. And about 640 thousand houses were destroyed. The number of deaths was the highest
since in the postwar period before the recent Tohoku tsunami and earthquake disaster. It was centered at
the north end of Awaji Island, at a depth of 16 kilometers. It had the magnitude of 7.3 (Japan
Meteorological Agency scale). An active fault runs from the northwest coast, through Kobe city, to Itami
city at the north of Osaka city. Because the fault shifted, this great earthquake was occurred When theearthquake had occurred, the real fault appeared on the surface of the ground at Nojima district in Awaji
city. Two parts of the ground slipped about 1-2 meters each other, and one part raised 0.5-1.2 meters Then
this fault was designated as a natural monument. And the museum has been built on a part of the fault In
the museum, one can see the real fault about 140 meters long And many photos and restored models
about the earthquake are displayed

Additionally, I have experienced the same quake as the Great Hanshin Earthquake in a model room. This
museum is visited by many people to learn about disaster risk and disaster preparedness.

(28) Fukura Port Tsunami Disaster Reduction Center:
Fukura Port Tsunami Disaster Reduction center is under the direct control of the Hyogo prefecture.
Round the clock observation of harbor wave or tsunami at the Fukura Port is going on. At the time oftsunami this Center would be used as emergency Evacuation Center. This Port is located at nearest to the
Pacific Ocean. This center is also used as tsunami preparedness and awareness training center for the
local community. I learnt from there that there is a chance of 4/5 meter tsunami within next 30 years inthis area. The center is well equipped with modern technologies on disaster management and early
warning system.

(29) Skurajima International Volcanic SABO Center:I gained experience about the horror of debris flow, knowledge gained about the Volcanic Eruption of
Sakurajima and Sabo facilities and simulation of disaster prevention information at the center.

I knew that the Sabo Project under the supervision of the Ministry of Construction started on the Nojiri,Harumatsu, Mochiki and Kurokami Rivers, which have their sources at the especially devastated
Mountain Minami. After that, the project proceeded for the Second Furusato, First Furusato, Arimura,
Kanatoko, Hinohira and Fukura Rivers, and as of fiscal 1999, a total of ten rivers have been involved.
Sakurajima had erupted 30 times in recorded history. The lava that gushed out due to the fierce eruption
in 1914 which is called the Taisho Eruption connected Sakurajima to the Osumi Peninsula. I came toknow that there are 19 rivers at Sakurajima and all rivers are from steep mountain streams and normallyno water runs in them. Devastated by active volcanic activities, the upper reaches of the rivers are full of
unstable sediment, which seems to the main sources area of debris flow. Heavy rainfall may cause debris
flow running down and damage the populated areas and roads in the lower reaches of the rivers. I was
informed that the Sakurajima International Volcanic Sabo Center is responsible for providing accurate
information on the volcanic activity of Sakurajima and other

Australia, New Zealand etc. in the field of erosion control. Various methods are tried such as use of low
cost local material and simple construction techniques for the locals to carry out the program. This Project
was very useful for Bangladesh sharing the information and experience and learning the good lessons
from JapanI learned more, about the history of Sakurajima city, affected people, construction works, disaster
preparedness, preventions and mitigations activities, seasonal plants, Sightseeing.

(30) Sakurashima International Visitor’s Center:
Sakurashima International Museum disseminates and simulated experiences for phenomena of volcanoes,
debris flow, earthquake and all the information about disaster risk management.
Kagoshima Disaster management training center:I gained the knowledge that people can survive an earthquake and minimize its damage simply bybecoming aware of potential hazards and taking some basic precautions, develop a family earthquake plan,
prepare and be ready every time and everywhere.
I learnt the methods of protecting ourselves at the time disasters like:1.

Stay calm and seek safety.

2.

How to prevent by fires

3.

Stay away from narrow streets, walled streets, cliffs and river banks

4.

Evacuation procedure

5.

How to listen the correct information

6.

Always be ready with Emergency bag

7.

Join forces for first aid

8.

Join forces for rescue

9.

What to do when driving a car

Daily Preparation Program for Disaster Reduction:
I learned about the daily Preparation like:1.

Anti disaster Training

2.

What should do during earthquake

3.

Reinforcing our houses, brick and stone walls

4.

Preventing furniture and elevated furnishings from tipping over or falling down.

Preparing extinguishers and Preventing fires
5.

Preparing personal effects and a first aid kit for emergencies

6.

How to conform family members safety

Bangladesh is also vulnerable to earthquake, landslide, flood, fire and so on. It will be very
useful for awareness creation about the disaster and minimize the disaster risk at all.
Under the ADRC Visiting Research program I came across the many disaster reduction institutions run by
Government of Japan, Local government, prefecture Government, Municipal level, Universities, andPrivate sector. Japan is pioneering the cause of Disaster management and Disaster Mitigation all over theworld. Lessons learnt from ADRC, JICA, and many other disaster management institutions andorganizations have helped me to understand the cause of disasters, disaster preparedness, mitigation anddisaster planning and mobilization of community to overcome disaster situations at the earliest.

27. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION IN BANGLADESH:
The following recommendations are proposed to improve risk reduction efforts through the strengtheningof key stakeholders’ abilities to mitigate, prepare for and respond to a disaster:Communities have inherent capacity to respond to any disaster. Community help themselves andthey are not the passive recipient of aid or help. Therefore, in disaster management strategy,
communities should be involved in managing risks that may threaten their life and property.

Comprehensive Action plan should be developed for increasing seismic safety of public facilities,
schools, hospitals and life lines to minimize the future losses of lives and properties that may
result from major earthquake.



Development of disaster mitigation tools for communities at risks by involving schoolteachersand students in the process, in order to assess hazard and risk of community.



Awareness creation, sensitization and capacity building of media in disaster risk reduction arenecessary for effective use of the reach of media and civil society.

Strengthen SAARC Disaster Management System for member countries to play central role in
DRR.



Reviewing the curricula from elementary school to higher secondary level and include DRR
content in a systematic way. There should be compulsory DR training /drills in elementary andsecondary schools.

Conduct regular research on indigenous knowledge on hazard assessment and risk mitigation
measures and disseminate it to wider audience.



Develop and implement a public awareness strategy involving communities and develop aperception through public information campaign that area is disaster prone.

Research and analyze local perceptions and adaptations to disaster risks as a basis for a disaster
reduction strategy in Bangladesh.

Participatory Learning Action(PLA) introduced by community based disaster management should
be strengthen so that community’s capacity for managing disaster related project will increase.

Government of Bangladesh has to integrate disaster reduction activities into normal practice ofgood governance and into the regular planning and budgeting process.

Government has to provide financial and technical and morale support to disaster related training
centers , NGOs who would act as change agents in the community participation process on
disaster risk reduction.

Networking among the communities should be further strengthened to share the experience andknowledge and expertise on disasters.



Experience and knowledge on the Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake can be replicated and sharedin disaster related training institutions in Bangladesh to face future disaster challenges.

Community awareness programs on disasters such as Kaeru Caravan, school retrofitting program,disaster training /drills and simulation program in Japan can be replicated in Bangladesh andshould be rigorously applied in schools and communities in Bangladesh.



There is no disaster related museum in Bangladesh. Like Japan, some disaster related museums
can be established so that school children and members of the public can learn about disaster
reduction activities through visits to disaster reduction museum.

Strengthen the Community member’s capacity building processes that promote self help, unity
within the framework of local disaster reduction.

Role of Disaster Management Bureau and Fire Service of Bangladesh should be expanded toprovide regular training/drills to public and school children.

The Standing Orders on Disasters may be reviewed to bring about necessary amendments in thelight of lessons learnt from the super cyclone SIDR in 2008 and tidal surge AILA in 2009..



District, upazila and union-level disaster management committees must continue to maintain theircapacity to plan and respond to natural hazards in a timely manner. National, district and upazila
committees must be convened prior to the flood and cyclone seasons to ensure that calendarspecific plans are updated and all stakeholders are prepared to conduct their assigned roles in atimely and professional manner.

Essential relief equipment (rescue vehicles, fuel supplies, telecommunications, mobile, fax etc.),
materials and supplies (food, shelter materials, medicines, water purification tablets, etc.)
necessary to respond effectively to natural disasters and human resources to tackle any
catastrophe must be catalogued prior to the seasons of flooding and cyclones. Special needs of thevulnerable groups including the disabled, children and the elderly should be taken care of.



A Program Management Information System (PMIS) may be developed with updated andaccurate information on the vulnerable population at the union level through regular assessmentsof their vulnerability to a specific hazard.

Greater sharing of information on the government’s preparedness, mitigation and response
planning and actions initiated at the time of national disasters is necessary in order to achievetransparency of purpose. An effective communication with the media has to be made, so that theextent of the crisis and the efforts of the government to respond to the crisis are correctly reported.



National development plans and national disaster risk management planning must be integrated inorder to protect valuable developmental assets from being adversely affected by natural or humaninduced hazards. Gender issues should be considered in the planning and implementation of all
aspects related to flood risk management. Steps may be taken to establish an effective system for
Damage and Need Assessment (DANA).



A mechanism for continuous training should be put in place to improve the capacity and skills of
all those who are involved in disaster management. Arrangements for the necessary training of
relevant staff should also be made to build up capacity for making assessments after any natural
disaster. The Disaster Management Bureau (DMB) may be strengthened in terms of humanresources and logistics to undertake the responsibility.

An evaluation and impact assessment may be undertaken in respect of the ongoing relief andrehabilitation efforts by the government to determine their effectiveness (strengths andweaknesses).



The awareness campaign and advocacy programme may be intensified in order to apprise thecommon people of the devastation of past natural disasters, as well as to prepare them for futurecatastrophic events. The members of Ansars and the Village Defense Party (VDP), Bangladesh
National Cadet Corps (BNCC), Girl Guides and National Scouts may specially be involved in theawareness campaign.



Information on climate change and climate variability conditions on Bangladesh needs to bemade available.

Regular monitoring to ensure compliance of SOD by all concerned, as well as timely completionof disaster related projects and programs. All the committees as stated in the SOD must be
activated and preparation of Action Plans at all level ensured. Incorporate the issues and concernsof river erosion and earthquake in the SOD.



The mapping and monitoring of hazard is needed.



Hazard mitigation activities such as the strengthening or construction of dykes ,slope stabilization,
the recovery of mangroves and in urban areas improvement of drainage

Improved ecosystem management, under the local responsibility including in some cases the useof PES mechanisms



Development of participatory land use and development plans that incorporate disaster risks
considerations

Strengthening of livelihoods, through promotion of employment and measures to increase
agricultural productivity water and food security and marketing initiatives

Application of microfinance and micro insurance to increase social protection and resilienceStrengthening of local governance, including the disaster risk reduction capacities of local
governments



The adaption of gender sensitive approaches into disaster risk reduction practicesCommunity should be trained up for maintaining health and hygiene at the time of disaster andtraining on first Aid should be provided to the members of the communities.

28. CONCLUSIONS:Japan is a highly developed country of the world. The geographical and topographical position of Japan
makes it vulnerable to disasters, because of its location at the “Ring of Fire and continuous clashes of four
Tectonic plates”. Although, every year Japan faces disasters like earthquake, tsunami , floods andvolcanoes which cause huge loss of lives and property, by using modern technology on disastermanagement and disaster mitigation and preparedness planning , it has miraculous recovery from severe
disasters. Indomitable courage of people of Japan helped it to overcome disasters quickly.
Similarly Bangladesh is also a disaster prone country because of its geographical and topographicallocation and due to the affect of climate change. The people of Bangladesh have won universal
admiration for their courage and endurance when subjected to hardships year after year, as thegovernment and international partners seek to protect them against the assaults of Nature. Actuallycomparison of a highly developed country like Japan and developing country Bangladesh is not rationale.
However, from the point of severity and intensity of disasters, both the countries have been facing
disasters.
Through initiation of more effective mitigation, prevention and preparedness measures, the Ministry ofFood and Disaster Management is seeking to lower the vulnerability of people living in high-risk areas,
while raising awareness about the need for inter- organizational and inter-disciplinary efforts at local,
national, regional and international levels, in order to address the root causes and solutions of destructive
natural hazards. Disaster prevention culture depends on the involvement the community. In future,research and development practice in Japan would explore the way in which understanding of disastermanagement and disaster reduction would be possible and discovering future technologies on disasters
may be satellite sensor that might read tell tale of volcanic activity, seismic shift and collapses days or
weeks before any catastrophe occurs or telemetry that can monitor the buildup of soil moisture in a watershed that could serve as warning of sudden flooding downstream or early warning can be issued forearthquake long before the disaster event.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

References:
1. Aghion,P, and P. Howitt.1998, Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge Mass. :MIT Press
2. Ahmed, A.W.Nuruddin, Lutful Haque Chodhury, and Steven Haggblade.2000. “ History of
Public Food Interventions in Bangladesh.” In Raisuddin Ahmed, Steven Haggblade, and Tawtiqe-Elahi Chodhury,eds., Out of the Shadow of Famine: Evolving Food Marker and Food Policy inBangladesh. International Food Policy Research Institute, Baltimore: John Hopkins University
Press.
3. Albala-Betrand, J.M1993. (Italic The Political Economy of Large National Disasters with Special
Reference to Developing Countries.) Oxford: Claredon Press.
4. Alxender David.1997. “ The Study of Natural Disasters 1977-1997.” (Italic Disasters) 21(4): 284304
5. Aspinall, WilliamP.,and Others. “Evidence-Bases Volcanology : Applications to Europe
Crises.”Draft. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, U.K
6. Kuraiwa,Julia,2004, “Disaster Reduction Living in Harmony with Nature”,
Quebecor World, Peru S.A
7. Bandyopadhyay, Chandrani “ Disaster preparedness for Natural Hazards: Current
Status in India”,2007, International Centre for Integrated mountain Development,
Kathmandu ,Nepal.
8. Khan,M.Asif, “ Disaster Preparedness for Natural Hazards: Current Status in
In Pakistan”,2007,International Centre for Mountain development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
9. Hasan, M, Qumrul,2006, “ Flooding in Bangladesh and Germany : Causes,
Control and Management”,2006, Goethe-Institute Dhaka, Bangladesh.
10. Mallick, Bishawjit and others,2010, “ living with Cyclone Aila”, Coastal
Research Foundation”, Shovna, Dumuria, Khulna.
11. Jha, K. Abhas,2010, “ Safer Homes, Stronger Communities : A hand Book for
Reconstructing after Natural Disasters” ,Published by the World Bank, Washington , DC.
12. Das, PK, 2010, “ Responding to the Past Preparing for the Future Post Sidr
13. Interventions in Education in Bangladesh”, DFID Supported Quality Education in Bangladesh
Regional workshop on best disaster mitigation,2009
14. Randolph Kent,1994, Disaster Prepareddness,2nd Edition, UND

15. National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management(2009), Government of Nepal, Ministry of home
Affairs.
16. DIPECHO(2009), Community mobilization in disaster risk reduction
17. Disaster Management in Japan(Cabinet Office Government of Japan)
18. JICA, Hyogo “Bokomi” Guide Book , Kobe City fire Book(KCFB)
19. Location of the Sea of Japan(LME) book Terazaki,1999
20. ADRC publications and News Letter
21. Disaster prevention and People : Working Towards The Creation of a Strong Society.
22. Hand Book for the Utilization of DMAM for Community Based Disaster management.
23. Implementing the Hyogo Framework for Action through Gendered CBDM, Disaster Managementin Hyogo Prefecture.
24. Comprehensive Strategy for Recovery from the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake,
Edited/compiled by Kobe Institute of Urban Research, published by City Of Kobe, Tanaka
printing and publishing company, Kobe, Japan,2010.(www.city of kobe.lg.jp).