C ALE Discussion Paper No.1
June, 2009

Economic law reformin Vietnam
Before and after WTO accession
Dr. Nguyen Thi Anh Van

Nagoya University
C e n t e r for Asian Legal Exchange

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

29

ECONOMIC LAW REFORM IN VIETNAM :BEFORE AND AFTER WTO ACCESSION

Dr. Nguyen Thi Anh Van
Hanoi Law University, Vietnam

4

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

Contents

INTRODUCTION

6

I. VIETNAM’S WTO ACCESSION PROCESS IN BRIEF

6

II. MAJOR ECONOMIC LAW DEVELOPMENTS IN VIETNAM
BEFORE AND AFTER WTO ACCESSION
1. Tax Law Reform

891.1. Corporate Income tax

91.2. Personal Income Tax

11

1.3. Import-Export Duties

13

2. Banking Law Reform

16

3. Enterprise Law

19

4. Investment Law

21

5. Securities Law

23

6. Competitive Law

25

7. Disputes resolution

25

CONCLUSION

28

5

INTRODUCTION
The last decade witnessed Vietnam’s efforts to become a WTO
member through a range of legal, economic and administrative reform. Since
accession into the WTO, Vietnam has continued its reforms with the aim of
implementing its international commitments and creating a better businessenvironment and level playing field for Vietnamese and foreign businesses.
This paper discusses part of such an ongoing reforms - economic law reform1 in Vietnam before and after obtaining WTO membership. The first section
briefly introduces the WTO accession process that Vietnam had gone through.
The second section comments on various laws and regulations concerning the
economy, such as taxes, banking, investment, corporations, securities andcompetition. The next section is a short note on the dispute resolution
mechanisms in Vietnam. This discussion and commentary on the abovementioned areas of laws and regulations aims to provide foreign readers withan overview of economic law reform in Vietnam before and after the country’s
accession into the WTO.

I. VIETNAM’S WTO ACCESSION PROCESS IN BRIEF
Vietnam’s WTO accession process is relatively long and can be divided
into three phases: the application phase; the negotiation phase; and theadmission and ratification phase.
In practice, phase-one, the application phase, commenced on November 11,
1994, when the Politburo entrusted the Vietnamese Government with the taskof complying with all necessary formalities in order to enter into to the World
1

6

The term “economic law” in the Vietnamese legal system embraces a broad range of laws
and regulations regardless of their private or public nature. Those laws and regulations
include: commercial law (in a narrow sense, governing commercial transactions such as:
sale and purchase of commodities, provision of services between businesspeople),investment law, enterprises law, banking law, securities regulations, competitive law,
public financial law (e.g. tax law and state budget law), labor law, land law, and evenenvironment law. This paper will not cover all such areas of economic law rather it
concentrates on the discussion of some specific areas within economic law.

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

Trade Organization (WTO).2 By the time the birth of the WTO was announced
in January 1995, the Government of Vietnam had formally applied for WTO
accession.
The WTO General Council established a Working Party at a meeting heldon January 31, 1995, to examine the application made by the Government of
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam to accede into the WTO under Article XII of
the Marrakesh Agreement.
Phase two, the negotiation process, had been conducted in order to achieve
two goals. The first was to clarify trade policy and the second was to open
Vietnam’s market to other WTO members. To achieve these goals, numerous
discussions were carried out from 1996 to 2001, to clarify the country’s trade
policies. Vietnamese representatives had to respond to several thousand
questions concerning commercial, economic and investment policies that wereraised by the members of the Working Party.
In August 2001, Vietnam officially posed an Initial Offer of Goods andServices in order to enter into a period of negotiation to open the market for
country members of the Working Party. Since that date, two types ofnegotiation - bilateral and multilateral talks - have been carried out. The former
was conducted between Vietnam and WTO members to reach better tax andtariff treatments. Bilateral talks with 28 WTO member countries, whorequested to negotiate with Vietnam, eventually came to a successful end. On
May 31, 2006, the Vietnam and U.S. representatives brought Vietnam’s
accession to the WTO agreements to a formal conclusion as well. The latter
was done to ensure that Vietnam would have policies that would be moretransparent and it would be able to enter into macro-economic policy
commitments. By October 2006, Vietnam had finalized the remaining pending
multilateral deals with a number of WTO members enabling it to complete thenegotiation process for Vietnam’s WTO accession. By the same time, Vietnam

2

See Official Dispatch No. 1015/CV/VPTW, dated November 22, 1994.

7

had also prepared all necessary documentation for WTO Special General
Meeting that was held on November 11, 2006.
Phase three - the admission and ratification phase - started in earlyNovember 2006. From November 5 - 9, a Vietnamese governmental delegation
headed by the Deputy-Prime Minister, also the Foreign Minister Pham Gia
Khiem, attended a Ceremony for Vietnam’s WTO accession in Geneva,
Switzerland. The delegation also participated in a number of foreign relations
activities over those five days. On November 7, 2006, the WTO’s General
Council approved Vietnam’s membership.
In its second session held in late 2006, the Vietnam National Assembly
approved the Agreement for Vietnam’s WTO accession. On December 12,
2006, Vietnam informed the WTO about the Vietnam National Assembly’s
ratification of its membership agreement. Accordingly, Vietnam became the
WTO’s 150th member on January 11, 2007.
The negotiation process took more than 11 years with over 200
bilateral and multilateral talks. In comparison to other WTO applicants, theprocess for Vietnam was the most time-consuming.3

II.

MAJOR

ECONOMICLAW

DEVELOPMENTSIN

VIETNAM BEFORE AND AFTER WTO ACCESSION
In the field of economic law, since the date Vietnam applied for WTO
membership in 1995, successive reforms have been carried out with taxation
law, banking law, enterprise law, investment law, securities law, competitive
law and so on. After becoming the 150th WTO member, Vietnam continued
displaying its efforts through ongoing economic law reforms to create a morefavorable business environment, in line with international commitments.

3

8For example, it took Vietnam only two years to become a member of ASEAN (1993 1995) and APEC (1996 -1998), and four years to conclude the US-Vietnam Bilateral
Trade Agreement (1997 - 2001).

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

1. Taxation Law Reform
Taxation law reform was commenced in 1990, almost five years
preceding the year that Vietnam applied for WTO accession. The 1990 taxation
law reforms, for the first time, created a unified taxation law system thatapplied to both state-owned and non-state owned economic sectors.
After applying for WTO membership, the Vietnamese Government
took further steps to modernize the taxation system through the passage of the
Corporate Income Taxation Law (1997), the Value-Added Taxation Law(1997) and the Excise Taxation Law (1998). These replaced the Profit Taxation
Law, the Gross Receipt Taxation Law (or Turnover Tax Law) and the old
Excise Taxation Law of 1990, respectively.
By the end of the 20th century, revision of other taxes had also been
carried out. For example: the High Income Earners Tax was revised five times,
in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1997 and 1999; Import and Export Duties were revised
twice, in 1993 and 1998; Tax on the Transfer of Land Use Rights was revisedin 1999.
In the new millennium, the Corporate Income Taxation Law and theLaw on Import and Export Duties, were again replaced in 2004 and 2006 by the
Corporate Income Taxation Law of 2003 and the Law on Import and Export
Duties of 2005, respectively. Shortly after obtaining WTO membership,
however, the National Assembly, once again, approved two new income taxes
levied on individuals and corporations, namely the Law on Personal Income
Tax of 2007, and the Law on Corporate Income Tax of 2008. Both Laws werescheduled to come into force on January 1, 2009.

1.1. Corporate income tax
The Corporate Income Taxation Law of 2003 was adopted with a nondiscriminatory common tax rate of 28% applied to both domestic and foreign
invested enterprises. The Law abolished a statutory provision imposing
additional corporate income tax on domestic enterprises; and revoked provision9

on profit repatriation. Consequently, foreign-invested enterprises are now
subject to a higher corporate income tax rate of 28% (compared with 25%
under the old Law) but they no longer have to pay tax on profit remitted abroad.
The tax rates range from 28% to 50% and apply to taxable income ofenterprises whose businesses are carried out in specific areas including search,
exploration and exploitation of oil, gas and rare natural resources. The Prime
Minister shall decide the rate applying to an individual case.
The Law adopted a uniform set of criteria for entitlement to tax incentives,applying to both domestic and foreign-invested enterprises that are establishedin business sectors, or located in geographic areas requiring investment
promotion. There are three preferential tax rates of 10%, 15% and 20% that
apply to newly established enterprises that meet statutory criteria. Tax holidays
of up to 4 years and tax reduction up to 9 years can be enjoyed by domestic andforeign-invested enterprises that the government wishes encourage.
The 2003 Corporate Income Tax Law, firstly, created a levelplayground for domestic and foreign-invested enterprises and a more attractive
business environment to businesses, recently however, it has revealed
weaknesses. The tax rate of 28%, was thought reasonable at at the time the2003 Law had been newly passed. However, the rate became less attractive to
foreign investors and less competitive when compared with rates adopted inother countries in the region where one can see a tendency of reducing
corporate income tax rates. 4 Furthermore, the tax base (including taxable
income, deductible and non-deductible expenses) were found to be unclear andnot in conformity with international practice.5 These were among the reasonsthat caused the 2003 Law to be considered no longer appropriate for current
4

5

10

For example, countries like Brunei, Malaysia, China, Singapore and Hong Kong adopted
corporate income tax rate at 27.5%, 27%, 25%, 18%, and 16.5%, respectively. For further
information, see Syed Rory Malai Hassan, Bandar Seri Begawan, “Government’s move tolower Corporate Income Tax lauded”, The Brunei Times, March 10, 2008,
http://www.bt.com.bn/.
See: Government of Vietnam, “Proposal on Corporate Income Tax Law”, Proposal No.
35/TTr-CP, debated at the 3rd Session of the 12th National Assembly held in May 2008, at
5.

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

socio-economic circumstances. Thus in May 2008, the National Assembly
passed a new Law on Corporate Income Tax which took effect on January 1,
2009 (the 2008 Law).
The 2008 Law offers lower tax rates compared with those under the
2003 Law by reducing the common tax rate that appliesto domestic andforeign-invested enterprises, from 28% to 25%. Enterprises doing business insome specific areas such as exploitation of oil and rare natural resources shallenjoy tax rates ranging from 32 – 50% compared with 28 – 50% under the 2003
Law. The 2008 Law revokes a preferential tax rate of 15% under the 2003 Law,
and accordingly, from January 1, 2009, there will be two preferred rates: 10%
and 20%, enjoyed by enterprises that meet statutory criteria.

1.2. Personal Income Tax
The Ordinance on Income tax for High Income Earners was firstenacted in 1991. Since that date, there have been successive revisions , the mostrecent being approved on March 24, 2004.
The revised Ordinance adopts two taxation principles, namely resident
and nationality. The tax rates were adopted on a less discriminatory basis
compared with the old regime. The gap between the tax rates applied toVietnamese and resident foreigners and Vietnamese expatriates working abroad(worldwide income) has also been narrowed. Vietnamese and resident
foreigners are subject to the same progressive tax rates ranging from 0% to
40%, but to a different taxable income threshold. The monthly taxable income
threshold for Vietnamese residents, although having been raised to VND 5
million, is still much lower than that applied to resident foreigners (VND 8
million).6
Progressive tariffs for regular income of Vietnamese residents andforeign expatriates in Vietnam:

6This threshold remained intact since June 30, 1999.

11

Level12345Monthly Income/Person (VND)
Up to 5.000.000
5.000.000 to 15.000.000
15.000.000 to 25.000.000
25.000.000 to 40.000.000
More than 40.000.000

Tax Rate (%)
0
10
20
30
40

As for singers; circus performers, dancers, foot ballplayers; and otherprofessional athletes, 25% of their income can be deducted before calculating
taxable income.
Progressive tariffs for regular income of resident foreigners andVietnamese expatriates working abroad:
Level
1
2
3
4
5

Monthly Income/Person (VND)
Up to 8.000.000
8.000.000 to 20.000.000
20.000.000 to 50.000.000
50.000.000 to 80.000.000
More than 80.000.000

Tax Rate (%)
0
10
20
30
40

Total incomes of foreigners that are deemed as not being resident in
Vietnam (the total length of stay in Vietnam is less than 183 days/a year) aretaxable at a unified rate of 25%.
In November 2007, a new Law on Personal Income Tax was passed toreplace the current Ordinance on Income Tax for High Income Earners fromJanuary 1st, 2009. Under the new Law, taxpayers fall into two groups: residents(being in Vietnam for 183 days or more over a 12 month period) and non
residents (being in Vietnam less than 183 days over a 12 month period). The
new Law will not automatically consider all Vietnamese nationals as residents
as the current Ordinance does. Accordingly, Vietnamese nationals working
abroad will no longer be taxed as residents.
The new Law seems more equal and fairer since it eliminates thediscrimination in income tax payment between Vietnamese and resident

12CALE Discussion Paper No.1

foreigners. They will both be subject to the same taxable income threshold atfour million dong and will be eligible to a deduction of 1.6 million dong per
dependent. A dual rate system applied to Vietnamese and resident foreigners sothat foreigners will be subject to lower taxes (tax rates vary from 5% to 35%)
but lower minimum taxable income means many more resident foreigners will
have to pay personal income tax when the Law becomes effective. Therefore,
the new Law, after taking effect, will encourage foreign firms to recruit
Vietnamese into key positions whilst the current Ordinance provides a greater
incentive to recruit foreigners as firms pay less personal income tax forforeigners than Vietnamese recruited for the same position.

1.3. Import-Export Duties
The international integration process has had certain effects on
Vietnam’s Import-Export Duties. In July 1995, Vietnam became a member of
ASEAN and has since commenced reducing import tax rates between January 1,
1996 and January 1, 2006 with the final tax rates ranging from 0% - 5%. It is
expected that by 2015, import tax rates will be eliminated for commodities
imported from ASEAN countries.
Vietnam became a member of APEC in 1998 (Asia Pacific Economic
Community) and advanced a national activities program in order to implement
trade liberalization by 2020 with import tax rate of 0%.
In July 2000, the US-Vietnam Trade Agreement was concluded,committing Vietnam to reduce tax imposed on a number of imported
commodities.
After becoming a WTO member, Vietnam will be subject to further
commitments concerning the reducing of import tax rates, and the amending ofsome other taxes in conformity with WTO’s rules.
In order to fulfill international commitments, Vietnam must continue
reducing indirect tax rates, among which, Import-Export tax rates require thegreatest number of amendments. Meanwhile, the old law and its revised version

13

no longer met newly emerging circumstances: Its provisions were no longer inconformity with the international agreements that Vietnam entered into during
its integration into the international community; the provisions no longer met
the requirements of state administration over activities such as anti-commercial
frauds, anti-loss of state budget revenue; they conflicted with the Customs Law
and no longer met the requirements of administrative reform concerning
taxation and customs. Thus in 2005, the National Assembly passed the newImport-Export Duties Law (the 2005 Law).
Most of the statutory provisions embraced in the Law on ImportExport Duties of 1991 and in the Revised Law of 1993 and the Revised Law of1998 were altered under the 2005 Law. This means that significant
developments were implemented in the new Law in comparison with the oldlaws. While drafting the new Law, the law-makers paid sufficient attention toensure the transparency required by WTO principles and other international
agreements, enabling Vietnam to negotiate in order to get admitted to the
WTO. 7 To achieve this, a new provision on Price for tax calculation was
adopted. Under Article 7 (sub-art. 2) of the 1991 Law: the price of imported
commodities for tax calculation is the purchased price presented at the bordergate for customs clearance, including the transportation fee and insurance
policy under relevant contracts. In cases where a commodity is imported in a
special way or the contracted price is too low compared with the actual
purchase price, then the price for tax calculation would be the price decided by
the government (minimum price).
Since mid 2002, under the old Law, the practice of calculating theprice of imported commodities for tax has not been applied, rather the price has
been determined in conformity with Decree No. 60/2002/ND-CP dated June 06,
2002. 8 Under this Decree, such a price is the trading price, which is also

7
8

14

See Articles: 8, 9. 11, and 12.
This Decree promulgated the Regulation of Assessable Price of Imported Commodities
Inconformity with Principles of GATT (General Agreement of Trade and Tariff).

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

understood as the actual price the importer had to pay after adding anddeducting a number of expenses as provided in Article 11 Decree 60/2002.
In order to meet WTO transparency requirements, the new Law on
Import-Export Duties adopts a new statutory provision concerning the price fortax calculation in conformity with Article VII of GATT. 9 Accordingly, theprice of an imported commodity for tax calculation is the amount actually paid
for the commodity arrived at the first imported border gate.10 Such a price shallbe calculated in conformity with Vietnam’s commitments found in international
agreements.
The new law adopts two methods for tax calculation. The old method,
based on percentage tax rates, remains intact. In order to introduce a new tax
calculation method, the new Law adopts a fixed tax rate system concurrently
with a system of percentage tax rates. Under the new method, tax will not becalculated based on percentage tax rates but rather on fixed tax rates applied to
an individual unit of commodities.11 Fixed tax rates were designed to apply tocommodities that trigger fraudulent assessable prices. So the new tax
assessment method is expected to eliminate fraud in the course of paying andcollecting import-export duties.
The new Law also adopts new provisions that promote export activities
and at the same time reduce legal loopholes that could be used for the purposeof tax evasion and unpaid tax.12 For example: the new Law lengthens the taxpayment term from 15 days (under the old law) to 30 days with respect toexport commodities; and unifies tax holidays for domestic and overseas
investment.
Apart from those new provisions, the new Law on Import-Export
Duties also embraces provisions that ensure the unity required for

9

See Sub-article 2 Article 9, the Law on Import-Export Duties of 2005.
Ibid, Article 9.
11
See Point b of Sub-article 2 of Article 8.
12
See Articles 15 – 18.
1015

administrative reform in taxation and customs areas.13 For instance: provision
concerning tax refunds, and tax-refund obligations and terms; provisions
concerning treatment for failures in paying import-export taxes; and provisions
on duties of relevant authorities in charge of import-export duties
administration.

2. Banking Law Reform
In 1990, two ordinances on banks were passed. For the first time, othereconomic sectors rather than state-owned sector were able to conduct banking
business. After applying for WTO membership, further achievements weremade regarding banking laws. In order to strengthen monetary policy and toenhance the efficiency of credit institutions, in 1997, the National Assembly
passed the Law on the State Bank of Vietnam and the Law on Credit
Institutions.
The Law on the State Bank of Vietnam spells out the goals of monetary
policy that should be achieved. Such goals include: stabilizing the value ofcurrency (the Vietnamese Dong); curbing inflation; promoting socio-economic
development; consolidating national defense and fostering better living
standards.14
In order to attain such goals, a number of monetary policy instruments
have been used by the State Bank of Vietnam such as: refinancing, interest
rates, exchange rates, mandatory reserve; open market operations.15 It can besaid that since the date of effectiveness of the Law on State Bank of Vietnam,
the mechanisms to adjust interest rates have steadily improved towards market
economy mechanisms. Instead of announcing the ceiling and floor interest rates,
the State Bank provides basic interest rates, based on which credit institutions

13

See Articles: 12, 13, 19, 20, and 25 – 28.
See The Law on State Bank of Vietnam, Article 2.
15
Ibid. Article 16.
1416

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

decide borrowing and lending interest rates in order to ensure their safety andsoundness.16
Along with liberalization of interest rates, exchange rates have also beenadjusted, based on the supply and demand of foreign currency in the monetary
market. Credit institutions may decide the rates at the counters on their own
initiative, relying on the average exchange rates announced by the State Bankin the inter-bank foreign currency market.17 In other words, the State Bank nolonger fixes lending or borrowing interest rates and exchange rates but merely
influences those rates using the monetary market and other monetary policy
instruments.
The Law on Credit Institutions has also brought significant changes tothe credit institutions system and the banking services. Under the new Law,
credit institutions fall into two classes: banks and non-banking institutions andthe forms of credit institutions have been diversified to include: developmentbanks, investment banks, policies banks, cooperative banks and financial
leasing companies.18 Foreign credit institutions can operate in Vietnam in theform of a banking institution, such as: a joint-venture bank, a 100% foreignowned bank, a representative office, or a foreign bank branch. Foreign credit
institutions may also operate in Vietnam in the form of a non-banking credit
institution such as: a joint-venture finance company, a 100% foreign investedfinancial company, a joint-venture financial leasing company, or a 100%
foreign-invested financial leasing company. The contribution of the foreign
party in a joint-venture commercial bank shall not exceed 50% of the bank’s
registered capital and that amount in a joint-venture non-banking credit
institution shall not be less than 30% of the institution’s registered capital.19

16

See Decision No 241/2000/QĐ-NHNN1 dated August 2, 2000 on Changes of Adjusting
Mechanism of Lending Interest Rates.
17
See Decision No 64/1999/QĐ-NHNN7 dated February 25, 1999 on Announcement of theState Bank on Exchange Rate of Foreign Currencies.
18
See Article 20.
19
See the Law on Credit Institutions, Article 12; see also Decree No.22/2006/ND-CP dated
February 28, 2006, Articles: 3 and 46…

17

Except for a foreign bank branch, all other foreign-invested credit institutions
are subject to the same minimum capital requirements as their domestic
counterparts.20
Banking services have also been broadened. The Law on Credit
Institutions adopted a number of services that were unknown under the old law(for example: financial lease, banking guarantee, trust, agency, insurance anddiscounting papers that can be valued in cash.)21
In addition, a number of measures have been employed to enhance theefficiency of banking business. Firstly, shareholding credit institutions havebeen required to implement an internal audit system and a supervisory board incharge of conducting periodic internal audits and of overseeing their own
financial and accounting activities. Secondly, policy lending have been
separated from commercial credit activities and entrusted to the Social Policy
Bank. 22 Thirdly,the financial capability of state-owned banks has beenstrengthened. Two state-owned banks have been equitized on an experimental
basis, namely the Bank for Foreign Trade of Vietnam (Vietcombank) and the
Bank for Cuu Long Delta Housing Development.23 The equitization process ofthe two banks has been accomplished in two phases. In the first phase (2006),
the banks offered not more than 30% of its charter capital to the public. In thesecond phase (from 2007 to 2010), the banks shall continue to offer shares tothe public, providing that the government shall be a 51% stakeholder of eachbank. Total shares held by foreign investors shall not exceed 30% of charter
capital of the bank.
Finally, a risk management mechanism has been applied to credit
institutions.24 Debts have been classified into five categories: (1) qualified debt

20

See Decree No. 141/2006/ND-CP dated November 22, 2006.
See Article 57, 58, 61, 72, 74, 75 and 76.
22This Bank was established under Decision No. 131/2002/QD-TTg dated 4 October 2002.
23
See Decision No. 230/2005/QD-TTg dated 21 Sep. 2005 and Decision No. 266/2005/QDTTg dated 27 Oct. 2005.
24
See Decision No. 493/2005 QD-NHNN dated 22 April 2005 on Debt Classification,
Reserve Funds for Credit Risk Resolution in Banking Activities of Credit Institutions.
21

18

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

(having provisioning ratio of 0%); (2) debt requiring attention (having
provisioning ratio of 5%); (3) below-standard debt (having provisioning ratio of20%); (4) doubted debt (having provisioning ratio of 50%); and (5) possibly
lost debt (having provisioning ratio of 100%).25 Credit institutions having bad
debts (one of the last three types of debts) shall be subject to provisioning ratiosof 20%, 50% and 100% of each debt, respectively.26 Credit institutions can use
provisioning sources to write off debts or enter them under off-balance sheet
items in the case of their borrowers going bankrupt or being dissolved, goingmissing or dying. Credit institutions have to regularly check debt collection andrestructure their bad debts.
In comparison with the old regime, the Law on Credit Institutions andits guiding legal normative documents: creates more opportunities for credit
institutions in conducting banking business regardless of their ownership;widens business environment for credit institutions; and pays more attention to
the safety and soundness of the banking business.

3. Enterprise Law
Enterprise law reform has been carried out since the late 1990s by thepassage of the Enterprise Law of 1999, which superseded the Companies Lawof 1990 and the Private Enterprises Law of 1990. The 1999 Law came into
force in January 1, 2000 and was deemed an important success of the reform.
The Law adopted a number of advanced provisions found in company laws ofdeveloped countries. However, after the Law come into existence, enterprises
in Vietnam continued operating under different legislations: the Enterprises
Law of 1999 governed privately-owned enterprises; the State-owned
Enterprises Law governed state-owned enterprises; and the Law on Foreign
Investment in Vietnam governed foreign-invested enterprises.

25

Five categories debts are”: (1) “qualified debt”, (2) “Debt requiring attention”, (3)“Below-standard Debts”, (4) “Doubted Debts”, (5) “Possibly Lost Debts”.
26
See Point 6.2 of Sub-article 6 of Article 7, Decision No. 493/2005/QD-NHNN.

19

In order to unify statutory provisions governing enterprises that belong
to different economic sectors, operating in Vietnam, in 2005, the National
Assembly passed a new Enterprises Law to replace the 1999 Enterprises Law,
the 2003 State-owned Enterprises Law and statutory provisions concerning themanagement and operation of foreign-invested enterprises found in the 1996
Foreign Investment Law in Vietnam and the Revised Law on Foreign
Investment in Vietnam of 2000.
The new Enterprises Law became effective on July 1, 2006, andreflected a non-discrimination policy between domestic and foreign invested
enterprises. Domestic and foreign legal persons and individuals in Vietnam areentitled to establish enterprises under one of the following four forms: limited
liability

companies,

shareholding

companies,

partnerships,

and

sole

proprietorships.
Subject to the business form, the company founders shall file therelevant set of business applications to a Business Registration Office at theprovincial or district level. Within 10 days from the date of receipt of theapplication, the Office shall issue a business certificate. In the case of refusal,
the Office shall give a written notice to the applicant. The procedure has been
considerably simplified when compared with that under the Company Law of1999, and the length of time for issuing business certificate has been shorten
from 15 days under the Enterprises Law of 1999 to 10 days under the current
Law.
Enterprises operating in some specific areas such as banking, insurance
and securities will be subject to the requirement of a business license before
starting their business. To obtain a business license they are required to meet anumber of statutory conditions including: minimum capital requirement,
professional license, and professions reserved for partnership.

20

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

4. Investment Law
In 2005 the Investment Law was passed to supersede the Foreign
Investment Law in Vietnam of 1996, its Revised Law of 2000 and theDomestic Investment Promotion Law. Accordingly, from July 1, 2006, foreignand domestic investors are governed by the same statutory provisions.
The new Investment Law guarantees investors’ autonomy in doing
business. Foreign investors are free to select the sectors they desire to invest in,
the form of investment, capital-raising methods, the geographical location andscale of investment, investment partners and the duration of investment inaccordance with Vietnam’s laws and commitments under the international
treaties.
Direct and indirect investments are two ways that investors can choose to
do business. Direct investment can be done in the following six forms: (1)100% foreign or domestic owned enterprises; (2) joint – venture between
domestic and foreign investors; (3) business cooperation contracts (BBC),build-operate and transfer contracts (BOT), build - transfer and operate contract(BTO), and build and transfer contracts (BT); (4) investment for businessdevelopment; (5) purchase of shares or capital subscription with a view togovern an investment project; (6) investments for company merger andacquisition. Direct investments can be carried out in the following three forms:(1) purchase of shares, bonds, and other papers that can be valued in cash; (2)investment by setting up an investment company or investment fund; (3)investment by establishing other financial intermediaries.
The Law also guarantees investors equal access to sources of capital,
foreign exchange, land and natural resources, legal instruments and data on thenational economy, investment opportunities and ensures investors’ rights tolodge claims, make denunciations or initiate legal proceedings.
Furthermore, the Law eliminates all discrimination in terms of prices andcharges applied to foreign investors. Investment incentives are applied equally
to domestic and foreign investors, who have investment projects carried out in21

industrial zones, export processing zones, high-tech zones, and economic zones.
Such incentives include: tax incentives, loss carried forward, accelerated
depreciation of immovable assets, preferred land use rights and other favorable
treatments.
All such things clearly reflect a non-discriminatory policy Vietnam
government has pursued on the way to accede the WTO.
In addition, investors enjoy better protection under the Law. Theirproperties are protected from nationalization and confiscation. A principle ofnon-retroactivity in the case of changes in policies is also adopted under the
Law. According to such a principle, if the laws are amended and new laws arelikely to put investors in a disadvantageous position compared with that underthe existing laws or under the investment license, investors will be eligible forinvestment incentives as provided for by the old law or in their investment
licenses (investment certificate, under new law). Foreign-invested enterprises
are entitled to choose to either re-register under the new Law and to operate
under such a law or to continue enjoying incentives found in their investment
license. Enterprises that do not re-register under the new Law would be
operating within the scope of business license and their own charter.
Investment has partly been liberalized under the new law. The Law
does not require all investment projects to be registered before thecommencement date. Domestic investment projects whose values are less than
VND 15 billion and are not included in the list of conditional investment
sectors, are not subject to registration requirements under the Investment Law.
However, investment registration at a provincial investment administration
office is required for: (1) domestic investment projects whose values range
from VND 15 billion to less than VND 300 billion and are not included in thelist of conditional investment sectors (no certificate delivered); (2) foreign
investment projects whose values are less than VND 300 billion and notincluded in the list of conditional investment sectors; investment certificate
must be obtained.

22

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

Investment evaluation followed by investment registration are required
for two types of projects: (1) Domestic and foreign investment projects whose
values reach VND 300 billion; and (2) Projects that fall into conditional sectors.
The evaluation process shall not exceed 30 days from the date of receipt ofeligible investment application.
Different authorities are in charge of granting an investment certificate.
The Prime Minister shall grant investment certificate to conditional investment
projects and projects whose values reach VND 300 billion or more. A
Provincial People’s committee shall grant such a certificate to unconditional
projects whose values range from VND 15 billion to less than 300 billion.
Depending on the investment sectors a project falls into, on the scale of theinvestment projects, and on the geographic areas the projects will be
implemented in, the project shall obtain an investment certificate from theManagement Board of an industrial zone, or an export-processing zone, or ahigh-tech zone, or a special economic zone.
An investment certificate shall be issued within 15 days from the dateof receipt of eligible investment application. The procedure to obtain
investment certificates, namely “one-stop service for investment certificate”,
has been simplified compared with that under the old law. Previously, investors
were required to run to different state authorities in order to get the investment
license issued.

5. Securities Law
Securities regulations were revised several times since the first
regulation, Decree 48/1998 was introduced in 1998. In 2006, for the first time,a Securities Law was passed by the National Assembly and entered into force
on January 1, 2007.
There are a number of new provisions adopted under the Law. The
following are the most notable provisions. Firstly, discrimination between
foreign and domestic investors has been eliminated under the Securities Law of23

2006. The Law adopts no provision to specifically regulate foreign investors inthe securities market. The law – makers left such investors to be governed bygovernmental regulations issued before the effective date of the Law. Therefore,
some limitations on the equity capital held by foreign investors still can befound under Decree 238/2005/QD-TTg. Pursuant to the Decree, the maximum
holdings of foreign investors has been increased to 49% of outstanding sharesof a listed company/a listed investment fund (compared with 20% of
outstanding shares and 40% of outstanding bonds under the old regime). Thereis no ceiling on the foreigners’ holdings of corporate bonds issued by an issuer.
A foreign securities company can maximally hold 49% of the equity capital ofa joint-venture conducting business in the area of securities (in contrast to 30%
under the old regime).
It is worth noting that the ratio of equity capital of a shareholding bankheld by foreign investors is much lower than that held by foreign investors in ajoint-venture securities company. Total equity capital held by foreign investors
in a shareholding bank shall not exceed 30% of the bank’s charter capital.
Secondly, information disclosure regulation and anti-fraud provisions
have been strengthened under the Securities Law, which promotes a transparent
and fair market.
Four types of information disclosure are clearly provided for in theLaw, namely: (1) initial public offering disclosure; (2) periodic disclosure; (3)immediate disclosure; and (4) disclosure at a request of the State Securities
Commission or a securities trading center. The discrepancies between different
legal normative documents concerning information disclosure were thus
eliminated. Types of information and content of financial statement haveclearly been provided for under the new Securities Law and Accounting Law.
Prohibited activities in the securities market that are adopted in the
Law are in line with international practices and include: misinformation,omission of material information, insider trading and market manipulation.

24

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

Short sales and margin trading are no longer prohibited under the Law and canbe done within certain statutory limitations.

6. Competitive Law
On December 3, 2004, for the first time, Vietnam adopted aCompetitive Law. The Law came into force in July 2005 and has been equallyapplied to all types of enterprises regardless of their ownership and theirbusiness forms. All enterprises have freedom to compete and they have theright to business competition. The Law gives wholly-owned and partly-owned
state enterprises no competitive privileges over non-state-owned enterprises.
Prohibited activities under the Law included: anti-competitive acts,
unfair competition, and Government Agencies’ actions to: (1) force enterprises
or individuals to buy or sale of goods or to provide services to designatedenterprises or individuals, or (2) discriminate between enterprises, or (3) force
enterprises to align with one another in order to precluding others fromcompeting on market, or (4) prevent lawful business activities of enterprises orof trade associations. Anti-competitive acts prohibited under the Law included:
anti-competitive agreements, abuse or dominant and monopoly position, andeconomic concentration. Unfair competition acts prohibited under the Law are:misleading information, infringement of business secrets, coercion in business,
defamation of other enterprises, and disruption of business activities of otherenterprises.

7. Disputes resolution
Disputes can be handled in one of the following four ways: negotiation,
mediation, arbitration and judicial trial.
To date, Vietnam has no concrete statutory provision concerning
negotiation. Hence, parties who choose negotiation as a way of solving theirconflicts have mainly relied on traditional methods. That is the disputed parties
themselves meet together to negotiate and agree on a solution.

25

Mediation occurs when negotiation fails or when disputed parties do
not choose negotiation to solve their conflict. They then look for a third party tohelp them to reach an agreed solution. Vietnam does not yet have a uniquestatutory normative document governing mediation.
Disputes can be brought before the Commercial Arbitrator under theOrdinance on Commercial Arbitration of 2003 if such disputes are deemedcommercial disputes. A dispute is eligible to bring to the Commercial
Arbitrator if it meets three criteria: (1) disputed parties are either organization
or individual having a registered business certificate; (2) disputed activity must
fall within those listed in Sub-article 3 of Article 2 of the Ordinance on
Commercial Arbitration; (3) Before or after the occurrence of the dispute, thetwo parties must agree to use arbitration to solve the problem.
The disputed parties are entitled to choose either the Arbitration Centeror an arbitration body set up by the parties themselves to handle the dispute(hereinafter, the Center/body). However, the disputed parties are statutorily
encouraged to use mediation during the arbitrating process. If the mediation is
successful and the Center/body is requested by the disputed parties, theCenter/body shall suspend the arbitration process. Where the disputed parties
request for mediation from the Center/body and where the mediation is
successful, then the Center/body will issue a successfully mediating decision
which is a final judgment, binding the parties.
If the parties do not agree with the decision of the Center/body, they
can bring their dispute before the court. In the past, the Vietnam had different
procedures to settle civil, economic and labor cases under the Ordinance on
Civil Procedure, the Ordinance on Economic Procedure and the Ordinance on
Labor Procedure, respectively. However, in many circumstances, it is difficult
to distinguish the sophisticated nature of the disputes to define which categories(civil or economic or labor cases) they fall into in order to use an appropriate
procedure for trial. The Civil Procedure Code of 2004 has done away with such

26

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

a problem. Accordingly, all the above-mentioned disputes can now be settled
by a unique procedure in the court.27
The time limit for initiating a lawsuit to resolve a case in a court is two
years from the date of infringement of the lawful right and benefits of a party.
Judgments of original courts are legally effective if not appealed within 15 days
from the date of announcement of a court’s judgment or from the date when acopy of the judgment had been delivered to the parties (in case of absence ofthe concerned parties at the hearing). Within the time limit for appeal, allparties are entitled to appeal against the original court’s judgment at the higher
court for a second instance trial. The appeal court’s judgment will become
legally effective upon being announced.
Under the current laws, all companies either from state-owned sector,
state-controlled sector or privately owned sector can receive an impartial trial.
A number of statutory principles have been laid down to ensure impartial
hearings, such as: principle of equality of rights and obligations in civil
procedure of all agencies and organizations, regardless of their form oforganization or ownership;28 principle of judicial independence…29 Judges andPeople’s jurors are not allowed to adjudicate if they are found to be prejudiced
in fulfilling their tasks and authority. 30 Judges and People’s jurors can bechanged to ensure impartial hearings.31 Such a change can be requested by a27

Administrative cases are handled by administrative courts in conformity withadministrative procedure provided for in the Ordinance on Procedure for the Settlementof Administrative Cases and its Revised Ordinance of 2006. The Ordinance allows theparties involved in an administrative dispute to bring the dispute before the court if thesettlement of the dispute through administrative proceeding s has been unsatisfactory. The
Ordinance provides for detailed and more transparent regulations on the procedures forsettlement of administrative cases in order to create more favorable conditions forcomplainants.
All administrative decisions on WTO related matters (complaints against administrative
actions concerning domestic and international trade in goods; and such actions in the
sector of State management of intellectual property and technology transfers) could bechallenged in administrative courts. The right of administrative complaints is stipulated
for in the Law on Complaints and Denunciations and its Revised Law of 2005.
28
See Article 8, Civil Procedure Code of 2004.
29
Ibid, Article 12, see also Ordinance on Judges and People’s Jurors.
30
Ibid, Article 16.
31
Ibid, Article 47.

27

disputed party if the party has evidence showing that the judges/people’s jurors
are not impartial.32
Effective court judgments have to be respected and implemented byrelevant individuals and organizations. A party to the dispute is entitled to ask
the judgment execution authority to issue a writ of judgment execution if theother party has not voluntarily implement the judgment. In such a case, somemandatory measures against the latter party can be applied under the Ordinanceon Civil Judgment Execution; or such a party can be criminally prosecuted
pursuant to the Criminal Code.
It can be said that a mechanism for dispute resolution and enforcementof court judgments is adopted in line with international practices and with
WTO principles. All has been carried out to achieve a fair competitiveenvironment in Vietnam and therefore, hopefully, step by step enhancing theconfidence of investors.

CONCLUSION
Economic law reform in Vietnam has continued even after Vietnam
became WTO’s 150th member. This is evidence that Vietnam is strongly
determined in revise its laws and regulations with a view to comply with WTO
commitments and to attract foreign investment in Vietnam. Trade liberalizationand foreign as well as domestic investment promotion are key goals that
Vietnam needs to achieve to foster national economic development. For thetime being, Vietnam continues to work towards completing the drafting of twobanking bills (one governs credit institutions, and the other governs the StateBank of Vietnam) and to revise a number of laws concerning taxes and the
securities market in order to bring the country’s regulatory regime in line with
commonly accepted international practice.

32

28

Ibid, Article 58.

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

29

Nguyen Thi Anh Van

Ms Nguyen Thi Anh Van successfullycompleted her Ph.D. dissertation at Nagoya
University Graduate School of Law in March
2003. She is now the director of Comparative
Law Center, Hanoi Law University, Vietnam.
Her research interests include: securities
regulations, banking law, tax law, corporate
financial law, and comparative law. Her
published works covered all of the abovementioned areas.

CALE Discussion Paper No.1
ECONOMIC LAW REFORM IN VIETNAM :AFTER WTO ACCESSION
AuthorDr. Nguyen Thi Anh Van

Published byCenter for Asian Legal Exchange (CALE)
Nagoya University

BEFORE AND

464-8601 Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, JAPAN
Tel: +81 (0)52-789-2325
Fax: +81 (0)52-789-4902
http://cale.nomolog.nagoya-u.ac.jp/ja/
Issue date

1, June, 2009

Printed by

Nagoya University Co-operative Association© All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval systemor transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording orotherwise without the prior permission of the publisher.

30

CALE Discussion Paper No.1

29

C A L E D i s c u s s i o n P a p e r No.1 (June, 2009)
Nagoya University
C e n t e r f o r A s i a n L egal Exchange