Learner

Autonomy andMotivation ina Cooperative
Learning Class
Akiko Takagi
University of Exeter
akilaki2@hotmail.com
•J"

A»

X
The purpose of the study was to investigate learner autonomy and motivation in a cooperative
reading class that I taught at a Japanese university. I closely examined my class to find out how
cooperative learningencouraged thestudents' autonomyand increased theirmotivation. In order toinvestigate the classroom atmosphere and studentperceptions, I consulted my teacher observation
notes, as well as the students' weekly learning journals and end-of-the-course hiterviews. The
questions I investigated are: (a) How, in terms of their motivation, do my students perceive a
cooperative reading class compared with reading classes they have experienced in the past? (b)How does the classroom environment influence mystudents' motivationand how does my students'
motivation change as theclass progresses? (c) What aspects of the learning environment encourage
mystudents' motivation and autonomy? (d) Are there anyproblems with cooperative learning thathinder my students' motivation and autonomy?
^<o^mtmm^wz^^xm^^^ztxm^fc.mtmm^^ti^(D^-oiz^^.(DQm:&ui',
mm^f^M^^ii^m^^\zt^rcmzmm:&m^.hrz.nm0^m^t^±0^K^m^:&fz
mz. mmz£.z>m.m^, ^s^ssiK^WBti, mm<D&&\zfit>tifzm$%&mi<tz. mm.
lists. £iT<Dttnox&z>, (i)mm^f®m&fr<oMx^Mtm&\zMmi>?twtmc>mmt
tt^XW)m&mz£&WiB®&mt:ZZ>&5\ZM%.X^Z>fi\ (2) 277M%ttfi£<»£.,!)\Z¥±<B
wim-imzBwzzz, &Mf)m$siz-Dnwim-$mzz<D&5?3.mkWM.*>ftz>t)\ (3) ^smmoE<D&otm]i)i¥ii%(Dmm.^rttmt'n\&mz§miMi-th\ (4) w,m<¥Wz3s^x¥£.e>

129*

A u t o n o m y Y o u Aski

i3o

•

TakagiIntroduction

Japanese university students are often regarded as passive and teacher-dependent in thelanguage classroom. We cannot easily dispel this impression because, in the traditional Japanese
education system,students are trained to behave passively in a teacher-centered classroom
until they enter university. I remember that I myselfhad never thought of playing an active rolein the classroom when I was a student because, until graduating from university, I had been
exposed only to teacher-centered classrooms. Moreover, since many students learn English
to pass university entrance examinations, their motivation is very low by the time they enter
university. However, it is also true that they think English is important for their future and want
to improve their English proficiency for real communication.
Even if students are willing to be autonomous learners, they do not know how to proceed.
For a few years, I have had my university students keep learning journals in my classes.I often
encounter comments which show their willingness to learn English autonomously outside of
the class, but at the same time indicate their frustration over the fact that they do not know
how to. In order to become autonomous, learners must change their view of the teacherlearner relationship. However, it is not easyto change the viewsof learners who for years haveexperienced only a teacher-centered classroom. If forced to be autonomous learners, theywould be perplexed and find it difficult to adjust themselves to this new role. Ho and Crockall(1995) claim that, in order to promote learner autonomy, both students and teachers should
help learners to realize that they must take responsibility for their learning. In other words, onemust create an environment in which the responsibility for learning is shared.
Considering the above state of affairs, I decided to introduce cooperative learning into my
freshman non-English-major reading class. The students' level was low intermediate. I admitthat I maintained a high degree of structure in the classthat may not seem compatible withpromoting learner autonomy. However,my main purpose was to encourage the students to takeresponsibility for their decision-making in class as a first step to becoming autonomous learners.
In this chapter, I would like to present the results of my efforts in my class, as evidenced
in part by my analysis of excerpts from student interviews and journals. Before I describe
my class, I would like to review the literature concerning learner autonomy, motivation, andcooperative learning. This will help to characterize some of the most significant theories of thethree concepts. I will then describe the action research conducted in my class. After I discuss thefindings based on my observations, student interviews, and learning journals, I will talk about
insights from other teachers and consider the implications for future research.
Learner Autonomy and Motivation

For a long time, Gardner and Lambert's (1972) integrative and instrumental framework has
dominated the field of motivational research. Both integrative and instrumental motivations
represent the primary reasons for students to learn a second language. Integrative orientation
signifies the learner's desire to identify with the target culture, while instrumental orientationrefers to the need to fulfill practical objectives such as getting a job. As more research was
conducted, it appeared that the dichotomy between integrative and instrumental orientation
did not cover the complexity of all motivational components. Researchers claimed that
Acknowledgements

Iwould like to thank all the members of the anthology group and Mr Philip Adamek of the State
University of New York at Buffalo for their feedback on an earlier version of this chapter— LD SIG 2003 A n t h o l o g y —i3i* Autonomy & M o t i v a t i o nmotivation should be explored from a perspective that adds a context-specific approach to thegeneral psychology of the integrative-instrumental motivation theories (Crookes & Schmidt,
1991; Dornyei, 1990; Oxford & Shearin, 1994).
Concerning the relationship between autonomy and motivation, Dickinson (1995) criticizes
Gardner and Lambert's model as being less useful for linking autonomy and motivation, andemphasizes the importance of cognitive motivation. In the cognitiveapproach, which has
recently attracted attention, two theories, self-determination theory and attribution theory, arewidely considered as being the most relevant to the task of encouraging learners to take controlof their own learning. If learners can control their learning, they can increase their motivation;
this, in turn, can lead to more effective learning.
Self-determination theory is based on a distinction between intrinsic motivation (learners
are interested in learning tasks and outcomes for their own sake) and extrinsic motivation(learners are interested in tasks for rewards). It claims that learners who are intrinsicallymotivated are better able to identify with the goal of their learning and more willing to takeresponsibility for the outcome. In other words, learners who learn for pleasure and the intrinsic
satisfaction of achievement are more effective learners than those who learn for extrinsic

rewards. When I think about my students, many of them have learned English for the extrinsic
reward of passing a university entrance examination. I hoped that I would foster the students'
intrinsic motivation by providing opportunities for them to consider their learning andresponsibility in a cooperative learning class.
Attribution theory relates to learners' perceptions of the reasons for success and failure. Fourpossible causes of either result have been identified: ability (internal and stable), task difficulty(external and stable), effort (internal, changeable, and under the learner's control), and luck(external, changeable, but not under the learner's control) (Dickinson, 1995). Learners who
attribute their success or failure to an unstable or internal cause such as effort tend to persist
in the face of failure. In other words, success in learning leads "to greater motivation only for
those who accept responsibility for their own learning success" (Dickinson, 1995, p. 171). This
indicates that for educators to promote learner autonomy, they should make students aware
that, to succeed, they need to take control of their own learning. In this sense, cooperative
learning seemed to me useful at least for the purpose of having my students realize theimportance of being responsible for their education.
Learner Autonomy and Cooperative Learning

Cooperative learning is designed to engage students in the learning process through carefully
structured group work (Cohen, 1994; Johnson & Johnson, 1989). Unlike conventional group
work, cooperative learning is not accomplished when only one or two members of a group do
all the work while the others wait for the task to be finished. Cooperative learning has been
defined as a "group learning activity organized so that learning is dependent on the sociallystructured exchange of information between learners in groups, and in which each learneris held accountable for his or her own learning, and is motivated to increase the learningof others" (Olsen & Kagan, 1992, p. 8). Cooperative learning is one of the most extensively
researched areas in education. The literature indicates that cooperative learning is effective inpromoting intrinsic motivation, task achievement, higher order thinking, and problem-solving
skills, as well as in improving inter-group relationships, heightening self-esteem, and lowering
anxiety (Cohen, 1994; Johnson & Johnson, 1989; Salvin, 1995).
Autonomy and cooperation might appear to be conflicting ideas if you assume thatcooperation implies mutual total dependency. However, as Thomson (1998) suggests,—

Autonomy

You

Aski

—

132

•

Takagicooperative learning is a useful experience for fostering autonomous learning. Throughinteraction among learners, students can obtain complementaryskills in autonomy andcooperation. The skills essential for cooperative learning such as problem-solving andnegotiating differences of opinion are relevant to autonomous learning, while the skills
essential for autonomous learning encourage students' active participation in cooperative
learning. And as Wilhelm (1999) points out, students who are accustomed to a traditional
teacher-centered method of instruction feel anxious when they are first asked to takeresponsibility for their learning. Therefore, we should give step-by-step guidance so that thestudents get through the transition period with greaterconfidence. In this sense, cooperative
learning can also help the students to develop self-confidence.
Objectives

In this study, I wanted to investigate how to use cooperative learningto encourage learner autonomy
and increase students' motivation in my reading class. I investigated the following four questions:
1. How, in terms of motivation, do my students perceive a cooperative reading classcompared with reading classes they have experienced in the past?
2. How does the classroom environment influence my students' motivation and how
does my students' motivation change as the class progresses?

3. What aspects of the learning environment encourage my students' motivation andautonomy?

4. Are there any problems with cooperative learning that hinder my students'
motivation and autonomy?
Outline of the Freshman Course

The class was designed to help students improve their reading proficiency in a cooperativeclassroom environment. For 13 weeks, from October 2002 to February 2003, the class wastaught once a week by a Japanese instructor in a 90-minute lesson. The purpose of the class
was to increase academic reading skills and English vocabulary, to develop critical thinking
skills,and to promote cooperation among the students. This was a required, pre-existingreading course for all freshman students intended to develop academic reading skills. Each
teacher was free to determine the content of the class. This was one of two English classes thatstudents took in the first semester. Since most of them had never experienced any form of co
operative learning environment before they entered university, I wanted to give my students
this experience for the first time in order to encourage their learner autonomy.
Forty-eight Japanese freshman students in the Faculty of Regional Studies at a city university
participated in this study. There were 32 male and 16 female students. Their level of English
was low intermediate. They had taken English reading as a required subject and about half thelearners were not highly motivated to learn the language.
In this class,I employed a jigsaw activity, which is a well-known cooperative learningtechnique. The technique is designed to encourage cooperation by making the individual groupmembers pursue a common goal. How can jigsawexercises be applied in a reading class? Let'stake the example of a reading activity on the pollution of river water. First, students form groupsof four called home teams, which are the collaborative learning groups. Four different reading
passages are distributed to the respective members of the home teams. These passages are writtenfrom four different perspectives (such as those of a fishing cooperative, an expert from the— LD SIG 2003 A n t h o l o g y —133* Autonomy & M o t i v a t i o n

Department of Commerce, a manager of a chemical plant, and a consultant). Each member leaves
the home team to form an expert team with members of other teams who have the same reading
passage. These temporary focus groups become 'experts' in the part given to them. The job of
the expert team is to familiarize themselves with the assigned piece and prepare to explain theirunderstanding of it to their original home team group members. The expert teams then disband,and the students return to their home teams. Students then take turns teaching their selectedparts of the passage to the other students in their home team. Finally, all the students perform atask that requires a full explication of the passage. For example, they can brainstorm solutions forwater pollution that may satisfy all the parties involved.
The class did five jigsaw reading activities of this kind over a semester of 12 weeks. In thefirst week of the course, the students were told the objectives of the course and the reasons
why the cooperative learning system was being implemented. In the second week, the students
were introduced to a jigsaw-type cooperative learning method. To create balanced groups,
the teacher formed groups by consulting a survey conducted at the beginning of the class andtaking into account the students' gender, personality traits (such as shyness or talkativeness),
and attitudes towards learning English. (In addition, in this particular class, the teacher knew
half of the students personally since they had taken a class with her in the previous semester.)
In total, 12 groups of home teams were formed, each having four members. From the third
week on, the students participated in full-length jigsaw reading activities.
I chose All Sides of the Issue (Coelho, Winer, & Olsen, 1998) as the course textbook. This
book deals with a wide range of topics including legal, environmental, and industrial problems.
Through content-based reading, each group of language learners dealt with four sides of acontroversial issue, and this encouraged discussion and debate. There were five sets of four
reading passages. The jigsaw reading activities using one set of passages were completed in
two weeks. In the first week, students did pre-reading activities and reading skills exercises,
and summarized the passages. In the second week, students shared their understandings ofthe passages with their home team members, discussed questions related to the passages,
participated in role-play discussion, and took a quiz individually. The home teams remained
the same throughout the course because I thought that this would help foster groupcohesiveness. The other team, the expert team, consisted of members from different hometeams. Unlike the home team, it was formed randomly every two weeks. I wanted to provide
the students with opportunities both to develop group cohesiveness and to communicate withas many classmates as possible. In the class I had taught in the previous year, the members of
the two different types of groups changed every week. Although the students worked with awide variety of classmates, some told me that they felt uncomfortable talking with different
classmates every week. Thus, to maintain balance, I decided this year to use both fixed andchanging groups.

The main idea of the jigsawreading activities is to increase a sense of individual accountability
and positive interdependence among the students by ensuring that each group member has a
specificrole and contributes to the group equally. Positive interdependence is considered to be at
the heart of cooperative learning. Students work together to accomplish a shared goal in groups,
and all the members of the group need to learn and understand the assigned material. Johnson
and Johnson (1999) state that positive interdependence "promotes a situation in which students
work together in small groups to maximize the learning of all members, sharing their resources,
providing mutual support, and celebrating their joint success" (p. 26).
The precise procedure of the jigsaw reading activities that I used was as follows. In thefirst week, the students formed an expert team of four members chosen from the different—

Autonomy

You

Aski

134

*

Takagihome teams, and, on every given day, members from each group decided who would assume
which role. There were four roles: facilitator, timekeeper, recorder, and checker. The facilitator
moderated the discussion and kept the group on task. The timekeeper monitored the timeso that the group could finish its task within the allotted period. The recorder wrote down
important points from the group discussion and returned the notes to the teacher afterclass.The checker helped the group facilitator and made sure that all the group members
understood the points raised and participated equally in discussion. After the pre-reading
activity, the students each read the passage to get the main idea. They then completed the tasks
cooperatively as a group. Finally, the students prepared to present information on the material
they had read to the members of the home team the following week. In the second week,
the students formed a home team of four, and members from each group assigned the roles
for the day.After each member took a turn sharing his or her understanding of the reading
passage, the students discussed questions about the passage raised by the teacher. They shared
the results of their group discussion with the whole class. Finally, the students took a quiz toconfirm each member's comprehension of the reading passages.
Keeping a journal was one of the class assignments. The students were required to submit
their journals at the beginning of each class everyweek. The purpose of the journals was tohelp the students develop their own critical awareness of their learning process. The journal
comprised three parts. In the first part, the students were required to list activities conductedin the class and evaluate them in terms of interest and usefulness. The original idea for thiswas taken from Woo and Murphy (1999). In the second part, the students made comments onclass activities for the day. In the last part, the students freely wrote about anything related tolanguage learning (such as disagreeable experiences in past English courses). I wrote commentsin each journal, answered the questions the students raised, and then returned the journals
during the next class.
Data Collection

The data I collected from this project included observations, group interviews, and learningjournals. After the first, introductory week of the course, I recorded the class activities as well as
my impressions of the classroom atmosphere and group dynamics each week.
At the end of the semester, semi-structured group interviews (each group had four
members) were carried out in Japanese to investigate the students' responses towards thecooperative learning experience. Each group interview lasted 15 minutes. The interviews wereaudio-taped and later transcribed for analysis. On the basis of the interviews, I identified thestudents' general responses to the class.
In order to understand better the students' feelings and attitudes towards cooperative
learning as they appeared in the interviews, I also consulted the students' journals. The firstweek of the journal was excluded because it was mostly occupied with explanations of classprocedure and ice-breaking activities. Thus, I read a total of 452 journal entries reflecting
regular classroom activities over a 12-weekperiod. I found it difficult to select, among 452
journals, statements that speak significantly to the questions raised in the interviews because
there were many relevant comments as well as many other interesting comments which did
not directly relate to the main themes identified in the interview. If I had read and analyzed thejournals more closely, I would have discovered new perspectives, but, given the limits of space
here, I will quote only a few entries.

LD SIG 2003 A n t h o l o g y —

135

*

Autonomy &Motivation .

Findings

Observations

Myobservation notes from the class suggest how the students gradually developed theirability to work cooperatively with eachother overthe semester. During the first three weeks,
the students were puzzled by the cooperative learning approach because they were used to
traditional ways of teaching such as the grammar-translation method. Moreover, they were
not quite sure how jigsaw types of reading activities actually worked. They were shy anddid not speak up voluntarily in group discussions. However, by the end of the first cycleof
jigsaw reading activities, the students understood how cooperative group work functions andgradually began to contribute to group discussion more actively. The assigned roles and the factthat the nature of the activity required each member to speak out helped the group members
to participate in group discussions more or less equally. The attendance rate was very high,with about 90% of the students never skipping class. As the weeks passed, group cohesivenessincreased, and the students became accustomed to expressing their opinions freely. Students
also got accustomed to each of the four group roles and played their assigned roles well. This,in turn, helped them to concentrate on the discussions.

I also observed that some problems appeared. In the home teams, the students felt relaxed
and were enthusiastic about participating in group discussions, whereas, in the expert teams,
the students' behavior differed from member to member. When no member wanted to lead thegroup discussion, all the members tended to be quiet and discussion stopped. Another problem
was the students' low English proficiency. Many of the students had not had much opportunity
to practicetheir oral skills in high school and could not express their opinions verywellin English. At the same time, they were afraid of making mistakes. In order to encourage
discussion, I distributed a handout of useful expressions at the beginning of each class and had
the students practice the expressions in pairs. In addition, I encouraged students not to worry
about making mistakes. This helped to reduce the students' anxietyto some extent,but they
still had considerabledifficulty in conducting their discussions in English only.In order tosolve this problem, I allotted a certain period of time in which the students wereallowed to use
Japanese, and this seemed to be an effective solution.
Interview and Learning Journals
Student Perceptions of their Motivation in the Cooperative-Learning Class
Compared with their Experiences in Other Reading Classes

During the interviews, students described a clear difference between the cooperative learningclass and other reading classes they had taken. Manystudents mentioned that their otherclasses wereteacher-centered and passive. They felt that they needed to take more responsibility
in their learning in order to accomplish group tasks and therefore participated willingly inthe cooperative learning class. They said that they felt more motivated in the cooperative classfor several reasons. One reason was that, since the students were assigned individual roles,

they felt motivated to meet their clearly defined role responsibilities. The distribution of roles
brought a certain level of tension to the students and led them to engage in the discussion
more actively. Another reason was that the students felt it was more fun learning in a groupthan learning alone. As can be seen in Excerpt 1,cooperative learning provided the students
with opportunities to think of problems from various perspectives, express their own opinions,

Autonomy You

Ask;

136

•

Takagiand listen to the various opinions of the group members. (All the excerpts from journals weretranslated into English by the author.)

Excerpt 1.1 understand the story better than usual. The oral summary made by all theother members was easy tofollow, so our group was able to finish our tasks efficiently. Since
all themembers understood thestory very well, they putforward various opinions, and I
enjoyed the discussion very much. (Learning Journal for Week 10)
In a communicative reading class,the students are more likely to find the approachto the reading topics stimulating. In high school, reading classes often focus on reading
comprehension, vocabulary,and grammar. Here, however, the students have the opportunity
to reflect on the reading topics with others and thus to develop their critical thinking skills, as
Excerpts 2 and 3 below show.
Excerpt 2. It was interesting to think aboutwho discovered America. Is it true that
Columbus found America? If it is true, whathappened to the native Indians who already
lived there? The story made me think of various things and wasa very stimulating topic forme. (Learning Journal for Week 12)

Excerpt3. We hada discussion in the home team today. Although each memberfocused ona similar point, I... learned a lotfrom the other members. For example, I learned thatwe
needed to think ofotherfinancial matters than taxes. Inorder tosolve the water pollution
problem, I realized that each position needed to be compromised somewhat so that the final
solution took each persons opinion into account. (Learning Journal for Week 10)

The students also felt more relaxed about participating in a cooperative learning classroom.
In other classes, students were usually required to give grammatically perfect answers to theteacher's questions. Thus, they were led to fear making mistakes in front of their classmates.
It is understandable, then, that at the beginning of the course, many of the students were still
afraid of making mistakes and were not willing to speak voluntarily in a group discussion.
However, as the courseprogressed, more and more students lost their fear of making
grammatical mistakesand stated their opinions frequently. The following interview extract
exemplifies this tendency.
Excerpt4. Today's story was easy to understand, and the role playing, in which themembers shared their opinions freely, was especially fun. As the class has progressed, Ifeel
that every member has become more accustomed to sharing their opinions more smoothly
in English. Although we may make a lotofmistakes, Ifeel that we have made progress incommunicating with each other. (Learning Journal for Week 9)

Effects of Classroom Atmosphere and a Change in Student Motivation

Most of the students perceived a great deal of change in the classroom atmosphere, andtheir motivation increased as the class progressed. Although some of the students adapted toa cooperative learning style very quickly, others took time to get used to this new approach tolearning and felt anxious about working in a group. As Excerpt 5 shows, this anxiety had an
adverse effect on the students' motivation to participate in group activities. However, Excerpt
6 suggests that, by the end of the course, students had become accustomed to the class and had
started to feel that it was fun to talk with their classmates.

— LD SIG 2003 A n t h o l o g y —

137

*

Autonomy &Motivation

Excerpt 5.1 felt very nervous because I did not know the members of mygroup very well.
I hoped I would beable to make friends with them soon. Since this was thefirstgroup
discussion we'd had, all the members seemed at a loss but tried to cooperate with eachother. (Learning Journal for Week 3)
Excerpt 6.1 got a mark of 8 out of 10 in the True or False questions. I was surprised that
I got the highest mark this time. I cannot believe that this is the lastjigsaw activity. I will
miss the members of thegroup now that we haveopened up to each other. I am happy
that I was able to makefriends with many classmates in this class. (Learning Journal
for Week 12)

Each student's positive attitude towards learning in a group had a positive influence on theclassroom atmosphere and, thus, as students reported in the interviews, group cohesivenessgrew as the weeks passed. This was one of the most important attributes of the communicative
reading class. It is clear that the students themselves recognized the development of groupcohesiveness. Especially in the home teams, which met regularly with the same members, thestudents felt more and more comfortable about holding discussions (see Excerpts 7 & 8).
Excerpt 7. The atmosphere of the home group is improving all the time, and each member
is becoming more willing to give his or heropinion. I alsoparticipate moreactively inthe discussions and understand the reading passages better. However, in the expert team,the members are usuallyunmotivated, and I do notfeel interested in participating in
discussion. (Learning Journal for Week 8)
Excerpt 8. We had the last home-team discussion today. Honestly speaking, I was at aloss for words and did notfeel very motivated when the class started. However, as theatmosphere of the class improved, I started tofeel that theclass wasfun. Asfor myEnglish
proficiency, I am not surewhether or not it improved. (Learning Journal for Week 12)

A Learning Environment that Encourages Student Motivation and Autonomy

In contrast with classes in which students are not often given the chance to use English andconsequently lack the motivation to do so, in the cooperative learning class, the students are
required to speak up in a group, regardless of their level of proficiency in English. Students
have many opportunities to listen to and speak English and feel increasingly confident in theiruse of the language. The following excerpt highlights how the students found learning English
to be meaningful and interesting.
Excerpt 9. Today's storywas easy to understand so I was able to relate thesummary to
mygroup members with greatconfidence. Ifeel great when I cangive my classmates themessages I want to convey and understand the messages others want to convey. When I wasa high school student, I learned English mostly in Japanese and felt it to be meaningless.
However, in this class I realized that learning English in English is verymeaningful. I havefun! (Learning Journal for Week 11)
In the learning journals, the students seldom referred to the teacher but often mentioned
their classmates. In a cooperative learning class, the classmates play a greater role than theteacher does. In other words, cooperative learning seemed to help students change their viewof teacher-student roles. The following interview extract, which is representative of many—

Autonomy You

Aski

—

138

•

Takagistudents' comments, suggests a link between encouragement received from other students andthe journal writer's motivation.
Excerpt 10. The objective of the members of our hometeam is to improve our discussion
skills in English. I hope that everyone will beable to achieve this objective by the end oj
thecourse. The class looks challenging, buttoday the members of mygroup listened tome earnestly and tried to understand what I meant. Ifeel happy when I make myself
understood in English and understand what others say in our discussions. (Learning
Journal for Week 3)

Some students learned from other group members that taking responsibility for eachrole facilitates group work. In other words, they become aware that, to make progress, it isimportant for them to be responsible for their own learning. Such self-awareness is crucial in
making students more autonomous as learners.

Excerpt 11. Mygroup was well balanced with two women andtwo men, so our discussion wasvery lively. I noticed that the role ofgroup leader was important, andsince our leader did hisjobvery well andled the discussion successfully, we were able to have a meaningful discussion.
I realized that in order tomake the discussion effective it was importantfor each ofus to have astrong sense ofresponsibility towards our roles. (Learning Journal for Week3)

Problems of Cooperative Learning

When the students were asked in the interviews about the problems they faced during theclasses, many of them pointed out that group members participated unequally. Furthermore,when one of the members was unwilling to participate in group discussion or wanted to talkabout something irrelevant to the discussion topic, the group's work did not proceed well.
Students said that if someone started to chat idly, they and the other members usually did nothave the courage to stop the chatty student and everyone in the group would end up chatting
throughout the class. Faced with a disruptive student, the other members tended to stop
discussing topics seriously. One unmotivated student could ruin the cooperative atmosphere.
In other cases, members depended on each other too much and did not take full individual
responsibility. The group facilitator played the most important role. If the facilitator was
effective, the discussions would go smoothly. Some students reported in their journals theirfrustration and complaints about other group members' behavior.

Excerpt 12. J knew all the members of today's group, so we tended to chat throughout theclass. We did not speak English very much. Although I wasafacilitator, I could notget themembers to concentrate on thediscussion. (Learning Journal for Week 5)
Another problem was that there were great differencesin English proficiency among themembers. Students with low proficiencysometimes felt alienated from fluent members and so did
not participate in the discussion. One student said that, since he was not used to speaking English,
he had difficultyspeaking often and tended to use Japanese. The following interview comments
indicate that some students reported difficultyin keeping up with the discussion in English.

Excerpt 13.1feel it is very difficult to convey mythoughts in English. I speak Japanese inspite of myself. I want toavoid speaking Japanese and improve mycommunication skills in
English. In addition, I have difficulty inguessing the meaning of unknown English words in areading passage. I also want to improve myreading skills. (Learning Journal for Week 5)

LD SIG 2003 A n t h o l o g y —

139

*

Autonomy &Motivation

Excerpt 14.Although I have become accustomed to the style oj this class, Ifeel very
uncomfortable speaking English all the time in class. Japanese sometimes comes outof mymouth without my noticing. Although I haven't hadanyproblems in the written test, Ifeel
shocked thatI cannot speak English very well in a real conversation. (Learning Journal for
Week 6)

Feedback from Other Teachers

I understand that this cooperative learning class is highly structured and represents only the
first step in encouraging my students to be autonomous learners. Since I need to take thenext step in promoting autonomy, I asked other contributors to the present volume for theiradvice. One said that I could give the students more topic choices. In this class the students
did not choose the topics they dealt with, and some students mentioned that they participatedin the discussion only when they found a topic to be interesting and stimulating. If they
could negotiate with their classmates and choose topics among themselves, they would be
likely to participate in the discussions more frequently. Another idea was to increase students'
metacognitive awareness of autonomy. The students would be able to raise their awarenessthrough discussion with their classmates on which learning strategies they used and whatreaction they received from the other students during group discussions.
One of biggest problems in this class was that students with low proficiency tended to switch
back to Japanese during group discussions. One idea for addressing this problem was that theteacher could set a tape recorder in front of each group to monitor their use of Japanese. In
this way, the teacher could pressure the students of a particular group not to use Japanese while
the teacher is not directly monitoring them. In addition, the teacher could listen to the tapeand analyze under what circumstances the students tend to use Japanese. In later meetings,
the teacher could then advise the students on how to avoid using Japanese. Another idea wasto introduce the role of language checker. The language checker would check how many times
each member speaks Japanese during the discussion. This student could also monitor otherstudents' use of English and givefeedback to them on this. While these ideas certainly mightprovide a short-term solution to practical in-class problems, the autonomous class has tomaintain a levelplaying field for the students and encourage them not to fear being corrected
for errors. In other words, the autonomous class has to prevent students from exercisingauthority over one another.
Another problem was that some students were less motivated than others, and, as aconsequence, group members participated unequally, especially in the expert team. One solution
suggested was to introduce warm-up activities that would help the students get to know eachother better before discussing the reading passages. In this way, the members would feel at ease
before moving onto the group discussion.Another solution offered was to fix the members of theexpert team, not those of the home team. In the home team, the students have to share their ideas

and perform tasks cooperatively, while in the expert team they are not forced to talk about thepassagecooperatively. This is one reason why the expert team is not as talkative and cooperative
as the home team. If the members were fixed in the expert team, the group cohesiveness would bestronger and the students would remain involved in the discussions.
Conclusion

In this chapter, I have discussed howcooperative learning worked to promote student autonomy
in my reading class. Judging from my observations and the students' comments in the interviews—

Autonomy You

Aski

—

140

•

Takagiand journals, I can conclude that cooperative learning worked well in that it fostered the students'
intrinsic motivation and encouraged them to take responsibility for their learning. In comparison
with traditional teaching methods, the cooperative learning classroomencouraged the students
to participate enthusiastically in group discussions. I was not, however, able to encourage all
the students to learn for pleasure and the intrinsic satisfaction of achievement. Owing to theirunfamiliarity with the system, it took a while for the students to appreciate the efficacy ofcooperative learning. Some were still doubtful about the cooperative learning style at the end of
the course. They thought that they could learn more efficiently in a teacher-centered class. In the
future, I should make sure that students understand the basicprinciples of cooperativelearning
thoroughly and how it contributes to their learning. Other students attributed their problems to
the difficultyof the tasks.To address this, I need to give the students more topic choices to prevent
them from feeling that the tasks are too difficult for them.
As for the few problems discussed above, I will consider adopting the advice of otherteachers in future cooperative learning classes. I would especially like to introduce activities
which increase students' metacognitive awareness about autonomy. The students did not havethe opportunity to share their opinions about the cooperative learning class. If they reflect on
the meaning of cooperative learning and their new roles as learners, they might understand
why they feel uncomfortable with this new learning style. The students might be more willingto participate in group activities as autonomous learners, once they understand the purposeand meaning of the class. They may also be able to share their learning journals with otherclassmates. Some students are too shy to share their opinions in groups, but if they discuss
their opinions about the class and about their roles in a dialogue journal, they might feel
more secure in sharing their opinions. In order to encourage learner autonomy, I will also pay
careful attention to the students' voices as evidenced in their journal writing. I would like toencourage my students to report every problem they encounter during the class. For example, ifthey face the problem of a disruptive student, I will talk about the problem after classwith thestudents involved. At the same time, I will encourage them to write their specific opinions of
the teaching method and of the teacher's role in their journals. My students did not write verymuch in the journals about the teacher—that is, about me. I do not think that this shows thatthe students were intimidated to write to me about my role, because I had a good rapport withthem and they often wrote about their private lives and personal matters. I have never asked

my students to write on any specific topic, but, if I center their reflections in this way, I might
be able to encourage them to learn more from observing the teacher-learner roles. Moreover, I
would be able to select some of their opinions and share them with the class.
In their learning journals, some students expressedtheir desire to learn English bythemselves outside of the classroom, since the class time was insufficient. However, they did
not have a clear idea about what to do other than to buy a textbook and do exercises.A few
students told me that they had started to learn English in such a way, but said that they had

quicklygiven up because they were too busy with other activities. I assume that the real reason
must have been that their method of learning English was boring. In order to sustain theirmotivation, I might suggest that they form their own English club that would continue after
the semester is over. They could meet in person, or they could develop an online space where
they could exchange messages in English and swap ideas about things they have found in
English: movies they have seen, books they have read, and so on. Having my students become
truly autonomous learners is my ultimate goal, so I willsearchfor ways to promote learnerautonomy beyond the model of a cooperative learning classroom.

— LD SIG 2003 A n t h o l o g y —i4i* Autonomy & Motivation . .

Critical Reader Response i

Emika AbeI have been interested in cooperative learning since I first took part in a cooperative learningseminar. I considered introducing the idea of cooperative learning into one of my classes
when I faced the difficulty of making my students work efficiently in groups. However, myinsufficient understanding of cooperative learning hindered me from applying this to my class.
In this chapter,Akiko documents her project very clearly. Her paper shows me, step-by-step,
the procedure of jigsawreading, and I can now picture myself organizing a similar activity inmy own listening and speakingclass. This is, therefore, a very good model for teachers whowant to put cooperative learning group work into practice.
I agreewith Akiko that it takes time for students to get accustomed to a new learning style.
Introducing jigsaw reading is a new experience for her students. Thus, repeating the samestructure several times must be a very effective strategy for her to incorporate into the designof this activity. This repetition gives students ample opportunities to practice the new learning
style, and, through this practice, students can find the strengths and weaknesses of theirlearning. Moreover, a highly structured activitylike this enables them to focus on the task.
Through these extensive and well-structured cycles of practice, students can become aware of
weaknesses in their learning and start changing attitudes towards their own learning. Akiko's
project is, in all these respects, a carefully designed activity.
I understand that assigned roles in cooperative learning enhance students' responsibility.
Once students have experienced that group discussion does not work well unless each person
takes responsibility for each role, they realize that precious opportunities to learn and practiceEnglish have been lost because of their irresponsible action. This failure leads them to change
their attitudes since they now know how important each role is. Through this process, then,students are taking greater responsibility for their assigned roles.
In the learning journals, Akiko finds students saying that they want to learn English
outside of the class.Although students have to explore more effective ways of doing this, it isworthwhile mentioning that their willingness to do out-of-class learning shows their positive
attitudes towards learning English. This, in turn, indicates that students have started reflecting
on their learning processes and have found the necessity to do something more outside of theclass. This is wonderful—they are taking responsibility for their own learning.
Overall, Akiko's project promotes students' motivation and develops their sense of
responsibility for their own learning. More importantly, such a project has a great influence onteachers' self-reflection processes. Cooperative work with other teachers benefits Akiko very
much, just as her students get great support and encouragement from their peers. I cannot
wait to hear about new developments in her jigsaw reading project based on other teachers'comments and her own self-reflection.

—

Autonomy You

Aski

142

•

Takagi

Critical Reader Response 2

Richard Smith

In the 'difficult circumstances' of a large class of apparently inactive students, how can a teacher
begin to develop autonomy? Akiko's account is a very useful one for teachers in this kind of
situation, since she writes so clearly about the procedures she adopted. As I'll explain below,
I continue to have some doubts about whether cooperativelearning techniques—on theirown—can enhance learner autonomy, but Akiko has persuaded me that a 'system' like the one
she's described can be a useful foundation to build on when (as here) it's well-designed to meet
students' needs and they can see its value. It's very clear that Akiko's students became much
more involved in taking responsibility for their classroom learning than in a more traditional
reading class, and more motivated too.
Cooperative learning techniques (jigsaw reading and role allocation in groups) certainly
seem to have contributed to the productive classroom atmosphere that Akiko describes, andto have promoted a spirit of 'positive interdependence'—an important aspect of autonomy.
Probably, though, Akiko's own positive attitude, and the way she clearly took account of needs
that students had previously expressed via dialogue journals, played as much of a role in thispositive outcome as particular classroom techniques. Overall, Akiko's account reminded me
how necessary good classroom dynamics are in any teaching situation, and how providing
a supportive 'structure' is as important as enhancing students' 'freedom' when it comes todeveloping learner autonomy in classroom situations.

To what extent, though, can students become interdependently independent of the teacher
when there is, as Akiko herself admits, such a'high degree of structure' (and, perhaps, so little
actual freedom?) in a class organized according to cooperative learning principles? The teacher
is much less obviously in control than in a traditional classroom, since tasks and roles are so
effectivelydelegated—but events are nevertheless very carefully orchestrated by the teacher.
Akiko's account made me think there might be a useful distinction to be drawn between
delegation as in this class (where overall teacher control is maintained) and negotiation (whereat least some control over learning contents and/or procedures is transferred to students).
Her account has also helped me to recognize that delegation and imposed group 'rules' can begood first steps in confidence-building towards autonomy, but my view continues to be thatnegotiation in at least some areas needs to then occur for autonomy to be effectively developed.
Otherwise, won't students remain forever dependent on how a particular teacher orchestrates
the classroom—and stay in the same position as before regarding learning outside class?
Negotiation would also provide an authentic reason for the ongoing reflection on work ingroups, which Akiko already feels could enhance the development of her students' autonomy.
One value of Autonomy You Ask! overall is the way we're given rare insights into the processof developing autonomy—snapshots of a never-ending journey, not pronouncements set
in stone. Akiko's contribution is interesting and useful for many reasons, but I particularly
appreciate the way it leavesbehind its moorings in a conventional literature review, researchquestions, and intention to evaluate a particular 'system,' and opens up unexpectedly into
learners' voices, their diversity, and the questions which these give rise to. Opening up to doubt:
Could that be what this is all about?

— LD SIG 2003 A n t h o l o g y —