JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the projectIntroduction of High Efficiency Water Pumps in
Da Nang City

Reference number

VN012

Third-party entity (TPE)

TPE-VN-002

Japan

Quality

Assurance

Organization (JQA)
Project participant contracting the TPE

Yokohama Water Co., Ltd.

Date of completion of this report

20/03/2019

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed using
document form
the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to the typeof project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology andapproved JCM that the applied version is valid at the time of submission of
methodology
the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
Emission
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in thesourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposedemission
JCM project.
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante
listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental impact
impactassessment, if required by the Socialist Republic of Vietassessment
Nam, in line with Vietnamese procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
stakeholder
consultation process and that due steps were taken to engage
1JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Name

Company

Function*

Schemecompetence*

Mr.
Sachiko
Team
JQA
Ms.
HashizumeleaderMr.
TadashiInternal
JQA
Ms.
Yoshidareviewer
Please specify the following for each item.

Technical
competence*

Onsitevisit

Authorized
Authorized* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader, teammember, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
Through a review of PDD, it was checked and confirmed that the PDD was completedusing the latest version of the PDD form (JCM_VN_F_PDD_ver02.0) appropriate to
the type of project and drafted in line with JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and
MR (JCM_VN_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0).
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team (herein after referred to as the team) concluded that the PDD
was completed using the valid form in line with the JCM Guidelines for Developing
PDD and MR.

C.2. Project description<Means of validation>
The title of the proposed JCM project is “Introduction of High Efficiency Water Pumps
3

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

in Da Nang City” (herein after referred to as the proposed JCM project).
This project aims to replace existing conventional water pumps with high efficiency
double suction volute pumps in two water pump stations of Cau Do water treatment
plant owned by Danang Water Supply Joint Stock Company (DAWACO).
The following water pumps produced by EBARA VIETNAM PUMP CO., LTD. areinstalled in this project.
・Raw water intake pump (450X350CWDM) (3 units)
・Distribution pump (500X350CWDM) (6 units)
Pump efficiencies of the project pumps at a condition for operational use are 86% for
raw water intake pump and 89% for distribution pump. Installation of high efficiency
water pumps leads to energy savings, hence GHG emission reductions.
The project participant (PPs) from Vietnam is Danang Water Supply Joint Stock
Company (herein after referred to as DAWACO) and from Japan is Yokohama Water
Co., Ltd. (herein after referred to as Yokohama Water).
The proposed JCM project is expected to achieve the amount of 738 tCO2e emission
reduction annually. The estimated emission reductions of the period between 2017and 2020 are 2,398 tCO2e as calculated in the PDD.
The starting date of project operation is defined as 01/10/2017 and the expected
operational lifetime of the proposed JCM project is defined as 18 years based on thelegal useful life of the water supply system under Japanese tax regulation.
The proposed JCM project was partially supported by the Ministry of theEnvironment, Japan (MOEJ) through the Financing Programme for JCM Model
projects, which provided financial support of less than half of the initial investment forthe projects in order to acquire JCM credits. As for technology transfer, training has
been conducted by EBARA VIETNAM PUMP CO., LTD. with a manual on operation,
maintenance and safety measures of the project pumps. Maintenance services after
project implementation are provided by Yokohama Water, which also contribute totransfer a technical skill to the staff of DAWACO through maintenance experiences.
The team conducted document review, interviews and an on-site visit to confirm theaccuracy and completeness of the project description. The documents reviewed
during desk review are listed in Section E.2. of this report. The one-day on-site visit toVietnam was undertaken on 17/01/2019 including the interviews with PPs. Theinterviewees are listed in Section E.1 of this report.
Regarding the language used in the PDD, an issue was raised and resolved as
mentioned section below.
<Findings>
4

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL01)
In section E.1. of PDD, the address of DAWACO is provided in Vietnamese language.
It is requested to complete the PDD in English.
(Summary of response by PP)
Please refer the attached PDD file.
In section E.1. of PDD, the address of DAWACO is added in English.
(Assessment comment by TPE)
It was confirmed that the address of DAWACO is provided in English and confirmedthat the PDD is completed in English. Therefore, this issue is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concludes that the proposed JCM project description in the PDD is accurate
and complete.

C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
The project applies the approved methodology JCM_VN_AM013 " Energy saving by
introduction of high-efficiency double suction volute pumps in water supply
system”, version 01.0. This methodology was approved by JC on 29 August 2018. It
was confirmed that this methodology is applicable to the proposed JCM project andthe applied version of 01.0 is valid at the time of submission of the project for validation.
The fulfilment of each eligibility criterion defined in the methodology is confirmed bychecking the documentation referred to in the PDD and by reviewing comparable
information.
Criterion 1: Double suction volute pump(s) with efficiency of more than 80% at acondition for operational use is installed for water supply system at a water treatment
plant.
Through reviewing thedata sheets for project centrifugal pumpModel

450x350CWDM and Model 500x350CWDM, it was confirmed that both models aredouble suction volute pumps and the efficiency is 86% and 89% respectively. Through5

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

the on-site visit to the Cau Do water treatment plant, it was confirmed that 3 units ofModel 450x350CWDM and 6 units of Model 500x350CWDM had been installed there.
Based on the confirmation the above, the team confirmed that criterion 1 wassatisfied.
Criterion 2: Project pump uses environmental friendly paints such as paints with 0.1%
or less lead, cadmium and tar during the production process.
Through the reviewing the “Painting inspection record for water pumps” issued by
EBARA Vietnam pump Co.,Lt.d, the team confirmed that pump uses environmental
friendly paints which contain 0.1% or less of lead, cadmium and tar.
Based on the confirmation the above, the team confirmed that criterion 2 was
satisfied.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team confirmed that the project meets each eligibility criterion of
JCM_VN_AM013_ver01.0 which is the latest version of the methodology at the timeof the validation. Therefore the team concluded that the project is eligible for applying
selected methodology and that the applied version is valid at the time of submissionof the proposed JCM project for validation.

C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>
The sources of reference emissions is electricity consumption by reference pumps.
The sources of project emissions is electricity consumption by project pumps.
Through document review, it was confirmed that all emission sources covered in theapplied methodology are included.
The

Monitoring

Plan

Sheet

(MPS)

has

been

prepared

by

using

JCM_VN_AM013_ver01.0.xlsx. The team confirmed that it is not altered, and its
required fields are appropriately filled in.
As for three project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante,
6

the team assessed theJCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

applied value for each of them as described below;-

EFelec (CO2 emission factor of consumed electricity [tCO2/kWh])
PPs apply the emission factor for grid electricity which is derived from a document
issued by Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Vietnam (MONRE),
Vietnamese DNA for CDM.
Through reviewing the single line diagram and on-site observation at Cau Do
plant, it was confirmed that only grid electricity is supplied to the plant and there
is no captive generator at site. Therefore the team confirmed that the appliedvalue (CO2 emission factor (0.9185tCO2/MWh) issued by Ministry of Natural
Resources and Environment of Vietnam (MONRE) in 2016) is appropriate.

-

ηPJ,i (Pump efficiency of project pump i at a condition for operational use [%])The team confirmed that PPs apply the value derived from the factory acceptancetest data sheet of the project pumps appropriately.

-

ηRE,I (Pump efficiency of reference pump i [%])
As for the pump efficiency of each reference pump corresponding to the project
pump Model 450x350CWDM (capacity 20m3/min) and Model 500x350CWDM(capacity 40m3/min) is selected from the default value in the applied methodology
in line with the capacity of each model. The team confirmed that PPs apply thedefault value in accordance with the applied methodology appropriately.

Regarding the description of source of data in the Table 2 of MPS(input) sheet, anissue (CL03) was raised and resolved as mentioned section below.
As for the parameter to be monitored ex post, PPs provide an estimated value of
ECPJ,i,p (Power consumption of project pump i during the period p) to complete the exante estimation of CO2 emission reductions to be achieved by the proposed JCM
project. PPs estimate the value based on the actual electricity consumption by the
replaced pumps in 2014 and 2015, also taking the efficiency of project pumps into
account. The team confirmed that the estimation is appropriate and accurate.
As for the estimated emission reductions in each year indicated in Section C.3 of the
PDD, an issue (CAR01) was raised and resolved as mentioned section below.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL03)
The source of data for EFelec (CO2 emission factor of consumed electricity [tCO2/kWh])
is not clearly specified in Table 2 of MPS(input) sheet.

7

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0(Summary of response by PP)
The description of the source of data is revised.
(Assessment comment by TPE)
It was confirmed that the source of data is clearly specified in the Table 2. Therefore,
this issue is closed.
(Issue raised as CAR01)
The estimated emission reductions in 2017 is not correct.
(Summary of response by PP)
Please refer the attached PDD file.
In section C.3. of PDD, the estimated value in 2017 is modified.
(Assessment comment by TPE)
It was confirmed that the estimated value for reference emissions, project emissions
and emission reductions in 2017 are appropriately revised.
Therefore, this issue is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team confirmed that the selected emission sources and GHG types were justified
for the proposed JCM project. The team assessed the estimated values for projectspecific parameters both to be fixed ex ante and to be monitored ex post in the MPS
including intermediate processes to derive the values. As a result, those estimatedvalues fixed ex-ante, and ex-ante estimation of CO2 emission reductions wereconsidered appropriate in the context of the proposed JCM project.

C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
On the PDD, it was mentioned that no environmental impact assessment (EIA) is
required for the project through the following documents;- Decree No.18/2015/ND-CP, ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLANNING,
STRATEGICENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT,ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACTASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLANS of February 14, 2015
Through review of the document above, it was confirmed that no EIA is required for8

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

the project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team confirmed that PPs did not conduct EIA in line with procedures as requiredby the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam.

C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
Local stakeholder consultation meeting (LSC) has been conducted on 22nd
September 2017 at the Head Office of DAWACO in Da Nang, Viet Nam. The local
stakeholders below were identified through the consultation with the JC secretariat ofVietnamese side.
-Da Nang Department of Planning and Investment (DPI)- Danang Water Supply Joint Stock Company (DAWACO)
The overview of the LSC is as below
Agenda:1. Outline of the project
2. Introduction of the product and technology
3. Benefits of the project
4. Q&A
Participants:[Local stakeholders]No.
1Organization
Da

Nang

Department

PositionofPlanning and Investment (DPI)
2Manager of Economy - Foreign Affairs
DivisionManager, Planning Department

3

Danang Water Supply Joint

Deputy Manager, Planning Department

4

Stock Company (DAWACO)

Staff, Planning Department

5

Manager, Technical Department
9

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

6

Staff, Technical Department

7

Staff, Technical Department

8

Manager, Finance and Accounting
Department

9

Manager, Water Production Enterprise[Project participants][Viet Nam] Danang Water Supply Joint Stock Company (DAWACO)[Japan] Yokohama Water Co., Ltd.
The comments received at the meeting were fully taken into account and the results
were reflected in the PDD. It was confirmed through the interview with PPs at the onsite visit that the above-mentioned process and due steps taken for the local
stakeholder consultation are appropriate.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concluded that the local stakeholder consultation of the proposed JCM
project was adequate.

C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
Through the review of the MPS and Monitoring Structure Sheet (MSS), it was
confirmed

that

they

are

described

based

on

the

appliedmethodology

JCM_VN_AM013 ver 01.0.
The team confirmed through the on-site visit that, an electricity meter was installed tomonitor the amount of electricity consumption for each project pump. Through theinterview with PPs during the on-site visit, it was confirmed that the monitoring data isstored in a SCADA system and PPs can check and obtain the data on a daily basis
through the on-line system.
With respect to the monitoring structure, it was confirmed through document review
and the interview with PPs that, the monitoring plan is feasible and the means of10

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

implementation of the monitoring plan, including the data management, quality
assurance and quality control procedures, are sufficient for ex post reporting andverification.
By the interview with PPs at the on-site visit, it was found that PPs determined thatthe interval of calibration or replacement of the electricity measuring equipment is 10
years based on the interview with the manufacturing company. Regarding themeasurement method and procedure, an issue was raised and resolved as mentioned
section below.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL02)
Regarding the measuring equipment of power consumption of project pumps, it isrequested to clarify the plan of replacement or calibration in accordance with theapplied methodology.
(Summary of the response by PP)
Please refer the attached manufacturer's specification and recommendation(Subject: Designed lifetime for M-System products. & Subject: Wattmeter_L53U(DD15438)).
According to the approved JCM methodology and the manufacturer's specification
and recommendation, the designed lifetime of the project measuring equipment
including performance on accuracy is 10 years, and therefore the measuring
equipment is replaced every 10 years.
The next replacement is scheduled for 2028.
(Assessment comment by TPE)
Through reviewing the provided documents and explanation, it was confirmed that themeasuring equipment is replaced every 10 years according to the manufacturer's
recommendation. Validation team determined that it is in line with the applied
methodology. Therefore, this issue is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concluded that Monitoring Plan of the proposed JCM project complied withthe requirements of the methodology and/or PDD and Monitoring Guidelines, and thePPs had ability to implement the described Monitoring Plan including feasibility of11

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

MSS.

C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
The Modalities of Communication (MoC) was submitted to JQA on 30/11/2018
together with the PDD for public comments. It was confirmed that PPs applied thelatest version of MoC form. All the two entities listed as the PPs in the PDD are
included in the MoC. Yokohama Water Co.,Ltd. is nominated as a focal point entity.
The corporate and personal details, employment status and specimen signatures in
the MoC were confirmed through a direct communication during the on-site visit.
Therefore, JQA determined that the information of all PPs, including the focal point
provided in the MoC and its correctness of authority, was appropriate.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concluded that the MoC complied with all relevant forms and requirements.

C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
It was confirmed preliminarily through the review of the relevant website (e.g.
UNFCCC website, Markit Environmental Registry, etc.) that the proposed JCM project
had not been registered under other international climate mitigation mechanisms. The
written confirmation of the avoidance of double registration was also provided throughthe signed MoC, and was cross-checked through the interview with PPs at the on-site
visit, with a satisfactory result.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
12JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concluded that the proposed JCM project was not registered under theother international climate mitigation mechanisms at the stage of validation.

C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
PPs determined the starting date of operation as 01/10/2017.

Through reviewing

the "Construction completion report dated on 30 August 2017", it was confirmed thatthe installation of the project pumps was completed on 30 August 2017. Throughinterview with PPs, it was explained that the there was one-month commissioning
period and the actual operation was started after the period. Based on above, it was
confirmed that starting date of project operation, 01/10/2017 is appropriately defined.
It was also confirmed that this date is not before January 1, 2013.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The team concluded that the start of the operating date of the proposed JCM project
did not predate 01/01/2013, and it had been defined appropriately.

C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No other issue was identified.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
Not applicable.

13

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
The PDD of the proposed JCM project, which was submitted in line with the Project
Cycle Procedure, was made publicly available through the JCM website for public
inputs. The duration of call for public inputs on the PDD was 30 calendar days
subsequent to the publication of the PDD, and it started from 04/12/2018. The specific
JCM website is as below:
https://www.jcm.go.jp/vn-jp/projects/55

D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
No comment was received during the period of the public comments, covering
04/12/2018 to 02/01/2019; therefore, no action was required to be taken into due
account by PPs.

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees
Ho Minh Nam
Phan Luu
Ong Van My
Nguyen Quang Hung
Ho Thang Thong
Pham Viet Hung
Junji Emori

Vice General Director,
Danang Water Supply Joint Stock Company (DAWACO)
Manager of the Water Production Enterprise,
Danang Water Supply Joint Stock Company (DAWACO)
Techinical Department,
Danang Water Supply Joint Stock Company (DAWACO)
Director,
Danang Water Supply Joint Stock Company (DAWACO)
Vice Manager of the Water Production Enterprise,
Danang Water Supply Joint Stock Company (DAWACO)
Vice Manager of the Water Production Enterprise,
Danang Water Supply Joint Stock Company (DAWACO)
Yokohama Water Co., Ltd.

14

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Kei Sato

Consultant,
Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting Co.,Ltd.

E.2. List of documents received
1

Project Design Document (draft)(JCM_VN012_PDD_draft.pdf)

2

Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (draft)(JCM_VN012_MPS_draft.xlsx)

3

Modalities of communications statement submitted together with the PDD for
public comments([English]JCM_VN_F_MoC_ver02.0_YokohamaWater.pdf)

4

JCM Approved Methodology JCM_VN_AM013 “ Energy saving by introductionof high-efficiency double suction volute pumps in water supply system, ver.
01.0”

5

JCM_VN_AM013

Monitoring Plan Sheet

6

JCM Glossary of Terms (JCM_VN_Glossary_ver01.0)

7

JCM Project Cycle Procedure (JCM_VN_PCP_ver03.0)

8

JCM Modalities of Communication Statement Form
(JCM_VN_F_MoC_ver02.0.pdf)

9

JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring
Report (JCM_VN_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0)

10

JCM Project Design Document Form
(JCM_VN_F_PDD_ver02.0.pdf)

11

JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification(JCM_VN_GL_VV_ver01.0.pdf)

12

JCM Validation Report Form
(JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0.docx)

13

Location information and layout map of the project site

14

Company profile of Danang Water Supply Joint Stock Company (DAWACO)

15

Company profile of Yokohama Water Co., Ltd.
http://yokohamawater.co.jp/

16Construction completion report dated on 30 August 201717

Legal useful life of the water supply system under Japanese tax regulation

18

Centrifugal pump data sheets
Doc. No.E161098/1210/A0101 for Model 450x350CWDM
Doc. No.E161098/1210/A0201 for Model 500x350CWDM

15

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

19

Painting inspection record for water pump
Model No.450X350CWDM
Model No.500X350CWDM

20Record of training conducted by EBARA VIETNAM PUMP CO.,LTD. Including
a manual on operation, maintenance and safety measures of the project
pumps

21

Single line diagram

22

Specification of electricity meter for power consumption of project pump23

Laws or legislation on the environmental impact assessment of Viet Nam

24

The minutes of the local stakeholder consultation meeting, including theinvitation letter and the attendees' list

25

Presentation materials for the local stakeholder consultation

26

Explanation document of the applied value for ECPJi,p (Power consumption ofproject pump I during the period p [MWh/p])

27

Evidence document of CO2 emission factor (0.9185tCO2/MWh) issued by
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Vietnam (MONRE) in 201628

Designed lifetime for M-System products. & Subject: Wattmeter_L53U(DD15438)

29

Project Design Document (final)(JCM_VN_F_PDD_ver02.0_YokohamaWater_190314.docx)

30

Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (final)(JCM_VN_AM013_ver01.0_YokohamaWater_190215.xlsx)

16JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers.
Statement of competence
Nam e:

Statement of competence

Ms. Sachiko Hashizume

Nam e:

Qualified and authorized by Japan Q uality Assurance O rganization.

Dr. Tadashi Yoshida

Qualified and authorized by Japan Q uality Assurance Organization.

Function

Function
D ate of qualification

Date of qualification

Validator

2015/11/20

Validator

2014/12/22

Verifier

2015/11/20

Verifier

2014/12/22

Team leader

2018/6/22

Team leader

2014/12/22

Technical area within sectoral scopes

Technical area within sectoral scopes
D ate of qualification

Date of qualification

TA 1.1. Therm al energy generation

2015/11/20

TA 1.1. Therm al energy generation

2014/12/22

TA 1.2. R enew ables

2015/11/20

TA 1.2. Renewables

2014/12/22

TA 3.1. Energy dem and2015/11/20

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2014/12/22

TA 4.1. C em ent and lim e production-

TA 4.1. Cem ent and lim e production

2015/11/12

TA 4.6. O ther m anufacturing industries-

TA 4.6. Other m anufacturing industries

2014/12/22

TA 5.1. C hem ical industry-

TA 5.1. Chem ical industry

2014/12/22

TA 10.1. Fugitive em issions from oil and gas-

TA 10.1. Fugitive em issions from oil and gas

2014/12/22

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastew ater

2014/12/22

TA 13.1. Solid w aste and w astew ater
TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation

2015/11/20-

TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation

17-