JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the project

Solar Power on Rooftop of School Building Project

Reference number

MV001

Third-party entity (TPE)

Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance Limited (LRQA)

Project participant contracting the TPE

Pacific Consultants Co., Ltd.

Date of completion of this report

13/06/2018

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed
document form
using the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to thetype of project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring
Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology
approved JCM and that the applied version is valid at the time of
methodology
submission of the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in the
Emissionsourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposed
JCM project.
emission
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex
ante listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental
impactimpact assessment, if required by the Republic ofassessment
Maldives, in line with Maldivian procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
stakeholder
consultation process and that due steps were taken to
consultation
engage stakeholders and solicit comments for the proposed
project.
1

JCM̲MV F̲や bl̲Rep veЮ l.0

No CAR orCL

Valld=iⅢ requireIInellts

Item

remalning
Monitoring

The description of tlle Monitoring Plan(MOn■ Oring Plan
Sheet alld Monitoring Structure Sheet)iS based on theapproved methodology and/or Guidelines for Dcveloping

the Joint Crediting Mechanism(JCM)PrdeCt Design
Document,Monitoring Plan,and NIIonitoring Report.

図The monitoring points for ineasurement are appropriate,aswell as whether tlle types of equipment to be installed are
aDOrOOrlate lfnecessarvl

All illputs on the PDD of the proposed JCM pttect

Public inputs

submitted in line wtth thc PrdeCt Cycle Procedure are

図taken into due account bv tlle DrOieCt DartiCiDantS.

Ⅳlodalities ofconllnunications

The corporate identity ofdl prdect pa■ idpants and a focal
point,as wcH as the personal identities,including specilnen

signatures and emploッ Tnent stattls, of tlleir alltllorized図

sigllatories are included in the ⅣloC.

The pIIoC llas been correctly completed and duけ
autllonzed.

Avoidallcl ■ ofdouble

図The proposed JCM prttect iS nOt registered under otherintemational climate nlitigation inechanisms.

図retistration

Start

of

operation

The sta■ ofthe operating date ofthe pЮ posed JCM p"jectdoes not prcdate Janllι ry l,2013.

AllthoriSed・ Signatoり :

‐

■ ￨■

￨

Last nanle:Chiba

晰 .図

図

Ms.□

First name:ヽ /1ichiaki

Title:Climate Challge NIIallager― Asiàと Paciflc

Speciinen sign

Date:13/06/2018

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Mr.
Ms.

Name

Company

Function*

Michiaki
Chiba

LRQA Ltd.

Team leader

Schemecompetence*

Mr.
Internal
Stewart Niu LRQA China
Ms.
reviewer
Mr.
Ms.
Mr.
Ms.
Please specify the following for each item.

Technical
competence*
Technical
competenceauthorised

On-sitevisit

N/A* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader,team member, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
The PDD was checked and confirmed as complete against the JCM Guidelines for Developing
Project

DesignDocument

(PDD)

and

Monitoring

Report(MR)

No.

JCM_MV_GL_PDD_MR_ver01.0. A valid form of the JCM PDD Form as of the time ofcommencement of the public comment period No. JCM_MV_F_PDD_ver01.0 was used for the
PDD Version 01.0.
The Joint Committee (JC) of the Joint Crediting Mechanism between Maldives and Japan at its
thirdmeeting

dated

19/03/2018

approved

therevisedversions

JCM_MV_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0 and JCM_MV_F_PDD_ver02.0, but use of the previous
version is allowed for the PDD published for inviting public inputs on 28/02/2018 according to
the JCM Project Cycle Procedure.
CAR 1 was raised as the resolution detailed below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 1
3

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Nature of the issue raised: The date of PDD Version 01.0 was indicated as XX/XX/XXXX.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs corrected the date of PDD.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team confirmed that the date of PDD Version 01.0
is corrected to 26/02/2018.
The CAR was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the PDD was completed using the valid form of the JCM
PDD Form and in accordance with the JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR.
C.2. Project description<Means of validation>
The project is to introduce 186.72 kW grid connected solar PV system on the rooftop of schoolbuildings owned by Villa Educational Services Private Limited in Male City, Maldives.
The power generated by the project solar PV system is firstly self-consumed. When there issurplus power, it is exported to the grid utilising the net-metering scheme. GHG emissions are
reduced by displacement of electricity generation in the grid using fossil fuels.
The project is implemented by Villa Educational Services Private Ltd. and Pacific Consultants
Co., Ltd.
The start date of project operation is on 02/09/2017 and the expected operational lifetime of the
project is for 10 years. The PPs referred to the Statutory useful life for the calculation ofdepreciation and amortization for machinery and equipment issued by Japan’s Ministry of
Finance for the basis of the expected operational lifetime of the project solar power system
indicated as for 17 years (the other facilities mainly made of metal), while the period ofdepreciation applied by Villa Educational Services Private Limited is for 25 years based on the
expected technical lifetime of solar power system. The project solar power system will have alonger operational lifetime with sound operation and maintenance activities, but the PPs
selected shorter lifetime that is conservative and considered acceptable as it fulfils the durationof the crediting period.
The project receives financial support for JCM model projects from the Ministry of theEnvironment, Japan. The PP from Japan contributes in transfer of technology by capacity
building on operation and monitoring in conjunction with the EPC company.
The validation team assessed the PDD and the supporting documents, interviewed the PPs tovalidate the requirements concerning accuracy and completeness of the project description.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
4

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team assessed the project description provided in the PDD with the supporting
documents to the requirements on the accuracy and completeness. The validation teamconfirmed that the proposed JCM project in the PDD is described in accurate and completemanners that is understandable the nature of the proposed project activity.
C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
The project applied the approved methodology JCM_MV_AM001_ver01.0 "Displacement of
Grid and Captive Genset Electricity by Solar PV System" Ver 01.0.
LRQA assessed if the selected methodology is applicable to the proposed project. The projectapplicability was checked against each eligibility criterion in the selected approved
methodology. The steps taken to validate each eligibility criterion and the conclusions about its
applicability to the proposed project are summarised as below.
Criterion 1: The project installs solar PV system(s).
Justification in the PDD: A solar PV system is installed. The solar PV module employed is
Trinasolar multicrystalline solar module TSM-PD05. The inverter employed is SMA Sunny
Tripower 10000TL, 15000TL, and 20000TL.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the project documentation,technical specification, the project completion report, and the on-site visit and interviews wereconducted at the project site.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that the
project installed rooftop solar PV system at the school buildings of Villa College Ql Campus
and the criterion is met.
Criterion 2: The solar PV system is connected to the internal power grid of the project site
and/or to the grid for displacing grid electricity and/or captive electricity at the project site.
Justification in the PDD: The solar PV system is connected to the internal power grid of the
project site and to the grid for displacing grid electricity.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the electricity diagram, theproject completion report, and the on-site visit and interviews were conducted at the project site.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that the
project solar PV system is connected to the internal electricity supply system of the Villa
5

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

College Ql Campus. The electricity supply system of Villa College Ql Campus is connected tothe public power grid system and no captive electricity is used in the project site. The project
was confirmed to displace consumption of grid electricity. The criterion is met by the proposed
project.
Criterion 3: The PV modules have obtained a certification of design qualifications (IEC 61215,
IEC 61646 or IEC 62108) and safety qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2), and havefulfilled the requirements of IEC 61701.
Justification in the PDD: The installed PV module Trinasolar multicrystalline solar module
TSM-PD05 has obtained a certification of design qualifications (IEC 61215) and safety
qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2). It has fulfilled the requirements of IEC 61701.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the technical specification,
certificates of design qualifications and safety qualification, the project completion report, andthe on-site visit and interviews were conducted at the project site.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that the PV
modules of the project solar PV system have obtained the certificates in compliance with theinternational standards IEC61215, IEC61730-1, IEC61730-2 and IEC61701. The criterion was
therefore satisfied.
Criterion 4: The equipment to monitor output power of the solar PV system(s) and irradiance isinstalled at the project site.
Justification in the PDD: An electricity meter is installed to measure the output power of thesolar PV system. A pyranometer is installed at the site to measure irradiance.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the technical specification, theproject completion report, and the on-site visit and interviews were conducted at the project site.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that themonitoring equipment has been installed for output power of the solar PV system as well as
irradiance at the project site. Thus the criterion was confirmed as satisfied by the project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the project applied the valid version of the approved
methodology and the applicability was demonstrated to the eligibility criteria.
C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions
6

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Means of validation>
The project supplies electricity generated by 186.72 kW solar PV system installed on therooftop of school buildings and displaces electricity generation in the public power grid system.
The source of GHG emissions is consumption of grid electricity and CO2 emissions in thereference scenario are considered to determine the reference emissions (REs), while the projectemissions (PEs) are assumed to be zero for the solar PV system in accordance with the applied
methodology. The annual electricity generation of the project is estimated ex-ante at 293.05
MWh. The default CO2 emission factor of 0.533 t-CO2/MWh is applied. The annual GHG
emission reductions (ERs) are calculated using the estimated annual electricity generation of the
project: ERs = REs – PEs = 293.05 MWh x 0.533 – 0 = 156 t-CO2e. The project started
operation with the first 155.94 kW from 02/09/2017 and with the full capacity from 29/09/2017,
and the ERs in the first year is estimated at 49 tCO2e.
The validation team assessed the documented evidence and confirmed that all the relevant GHG
emission sources covered in the applied methodology are addressed, and the steps taken and theequations applied to calculate REs for the proposed project comply with the requirements of theapproved methodology.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that:- The methodology was applied correctly to calculate PEs and REs and no other significant
emission source was identified that would be affected and reasonably attributed by
implementation of the proposed project but not addressed by the applied methodology;- The choice of whether an emission source or gas is to be included where the applied
methodology allows was reasonably justified by the PPs;
- The Monitoring Plan Sheet (MPS) was not altered and the fields were filled in as required sothat all estimates of the REs could be replicated using the data and parameter values provided in
the PDD;- The values for the project specific parameters fixed ex ante listed in the MPS were appropriate
with all the data sources and assumptions and the calculations were correct to the proposed
JCM project;- All assumptions and data used by the PPs were listed in the PDD, including their references
and sources; and7

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- All values used in the PDD were considered reasonable in the context of the proposed JCM
project.
C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
The proposed project is to install 186.72 kW solar PV system on the rooftop of the existing
school buildings and an environmental impact assessment is not required by laws of the hostcountry. The validation team assessed the applicable legal requirements in the host country
using its local sources/expertise and confirmed that an environmental impact assessment is not
required to be conducted for implementation of the project.
The details of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in the Section E ofthis report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed by assessing the relevant documents and using the local
sources/expertise that the project does not need an environmental impacts assessment to be
conducted to meet the legal requirement of the host country and the PDD satisfies therequirements of the JCM.
C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
The PPs identified the government of the host country, staff of Villa College as the main local
stakeholder and held a consultation meeting. Representatives of the local stakeholder attended
the meeting provided no negative comment through the process.
The details of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in the Section E ofthis report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the PPs have invited comments to the proposed project fromthe relevant local stakeholders, the summary of the comments received is provided in the PDD
in a complete manner and the PPs have taken due account of all the comments received from8

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

the local stakeholders as the processes described in the PDD.
C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
The MP consisting of the MPS and Monitoring Structure Sheet (MSS) is based on the approved
methodology.
The electricity generated by the project solar PV system is directly and continuously measured.
The reading is taken by an electricity meter.
The electricity meter is designed to comply with requirements of IEC 62053-21 and theaccuracy class is 1.
The roles and responsibilities of the persons are described in the MSS in accordance with therequirements of the applied methodology. The reading results of electricity meters are monthly
recorded, checked by the Supervisor and Project Manager.
The validation team confirmed that the MP complied with the requirements in the approved
methodology and that the PPs will be able to apply the MP following the monitoringarrangements described in it. CL 1 and CAR 2 were issued that the details of resolution are as
described below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CL 1
Nature of the issue raised: Metering Code of Singapore is referenced for calibration of themeasuring equipment but monitoring spreadsheet of the approved methodology requires
calibration in line with international/national standards or manufacturer’s specification.
Application of Metering Scheme Regulation of the host country provided as reference
document should also be confirmed.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs clarified that the electricity meter iscalibrated to fulfil the requirements of the international standard IEC 62053-21, but neither
international/national standards nor manufacturer’s specification indicates a calibration
frequency including the Metering Scheme Regulation of the host country, therefore the PPs
referred to the Metering Code of Singapore to determine the calibration frequency following agood practice applied under JCM scheme that is a national regulation of a country where themeter is mainly used.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team considered clarification by the PPs andconfirmed that the PPs referred to a national regulation of a country where the meter is mainly
used to determine the calibration frequency following a good practice applied under JCM
9

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

scheme to fulfil the requirements of the approved methodology for calibration.
The CL was closed.
Grade / Ref: CAR 2
Nature of the issue raised: A person(s) responsible for managing monitoring points formaintaining and control measuring instruments including calibration/regular inspection as
applicable was not specified.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs revised the monitoring manual and clarified
appointment to the Meter Reader for maintaining the electricity meter.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the revised monitoring manual andconfirmed appointment of responsible person for maintaining the measuring instruments.
The CAR was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the MP was described in compliance with the requirementsof the approved methodology and the Guidelines for developing PDD and MR, and the PPs
have demonstrated feasibility of the monitoring structure and their ability to implement the MP.
C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
The MoC was submitted to LRQA in the form JCM_MV_F_MoC_ver01.0. The MoC
nominates Pacific Consultants Co., Ltd. as the focal point and was signed by the authorized
representatives of all the PPs with the contact details. The form used is the latest one as of thetime of validation.
CAR 3 was issued that the details of resolution are as described below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 3
Nature of the issue raised: Relevant evidence to confirm information in the MoC was notprovided.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs provided the written confirmation for the
MoC for review by the validation team.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team assessed the personal identities of theauthorized signatories of the MoC through reviewing the written confirmation from the PP withwhom LRQA contracted the validation, namely Pacific Consultants Co., Ltd. The written
10

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

confirmation was issued by a Director of the company whose authorization was confirmed by
the power of attorney, and it confirms that all corporate and personal details including specimen
signatures are valid and accurate as requested in the JCM Guidelines for Validation andVerification. The validation team also confirmed through reviewing the corporate informationof the PPs and by meeting the persons representing the PPs that the information provided in the
MoC is correct.
The CAR was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the MoC was completed using the latest form after
assessment conducted on relevance of the MoC in compliance with the requirements of the
JCM Guidelines.
C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
The validation team assessed and confirmed relevance of the written confirmation in the MoC
from the PPs that the proposed JCM project was not registered under the other international
climate mitigation mechanisms.
The team in addition to the interviews with the PPs checked publicly accessible information of
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), Joint Implementation (JI), Verified Carbon Standard(VCS) and Gold Standard (GS) and found no identical project as the proposed JCM project interms of the name of entities, applied technology, scale and the location. The result ofresearches confirmed that the proposed project was not registered under the other international
climate mitigation mechanisms than JCM and it will not result in a double counting of GHG
emission reductions.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the proposed JCM project was not registered under the otherinternational climate mitigation mechanisms.
C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>11

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The start date for the operation of the proposed JCM project is indicated in the PDD as
02/09/2017.
The validation team confirmed correctness/relevance of the information by reviewing the
supporting evidence, including but not limited to assessing of the contracts and projectcompletion report, and that the date is not before 01/01/2013 as required to be eligible as a JCM
project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the start date of operation of the proposed JCM project is
02/09/2017 and not before 01/01/2013 as required to be eligible as a JCM project.
C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No issue was identified as relevant element not covered above.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Not applicable<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
Not applicable

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
In line with the JCM Project Cycle Procedure, the PDD is to be made publicly available for 30days to invite public comments. The PDD was made publicly available in line with therequirements of the procedure for the period of 28/02/2018 to 29/03/2018 as per
https://www.jcm.go.jp/mv-jp/projects/47.

D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
No comment was received during the above period to receive public inputs.
Thus no action was required to be taken by the PPs to satisfy the JCM requirement.
12

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees
Villa College / Villa Educational Services Private Ltd.
Ali Najeeb, Vice Rector
Abdul Munnim Mohamed Manik, Deputy Vice Rector, Administration and Finance (ProjectManager)
Mariyam Nazviya, Director, Policy and International Relations
Abdulla Naseer, Manager, Physical Facilities Unit
Ibrahim Waheed, Manager, Physical Facilities Unit
Pacific Consultants Co., Ltd.
Yoshihiro Mizuno, General Manager, International Division, Global Environment Department
Noriko Ishibashi, Researcher, International Division, Global Environment Department
Ministry of Environment and Energy
Zammath Khaleel, Assistant Director, Climate Change Department
Avi Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Ismail Athif, Managing Director
Hassan Yasir, Director of Operations
Mohamed Yamin, Sales

E.2. List of documents received
Category A documents (documents prepared by the PP)- PDD Version 01.0 dated 26/02/2018 with the monitoring spreadsheet- MoC dated 26/02/2018- Technical specification of the Honey Framed 60-cell Module specification, Trina Solar
Limited- Photographs of project construction- Profile of Villa College- Feasibility study report of JCM project “Solar power and battery operational system using13

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

energy management system (EMS)”- Construction progress report- Project Completion Report for Supply and Installation of 186.72 kW Solar PV System at Villa
College QI Campus, Male’ Maldives, Avi Technologies Pvt Ltd.
- Acquired properties management register, list of statutory useful life, table for useful life ofmachinery and equipment- Monitoring Manual Ver. 1.0 and Ver. 2.0, Pacific Consultants Co., Ltd.
- Contract of Work dated 20/04/2017- Single Line Diagram Roof A, B, C, D, E1, E2, F, G1, G2, H, I1, I2, Grid Connection, Existing
LV Main Distribution Panel- Certificate of IEC 61215:2005, TUV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH dated 02/12/2013- Certificate of IEC 61730-1:2004 and IEC 61730-2:2004, TUV Rheinland LGA ProductsGmbH dated 02/12/2013- Silicon-cell Pyranometers specification, Apogee Instruments- Estimated power generation and CO2 emission reductions- Metering Scheme Regulation, Maldives Energy Authority- Certificate of Type Test of Energy Meters for EDMI Mk6N, KEMA T&D Testing Services
dated 02/10/2010 (Net meter)- Mk6N Advanced Three Phase Electronic Revenue Meter Specifications, EDMI Limited (netmeter)- Photograph of electricity meter- Regulation on the Preparation of Environmental Impact Assessment Report 2012 No.
2012/R-27, Ministry of Housing and Environment (unofficial translation)- Notes for Stakeholder Consultation Meeting dated 27/09/2017- Log book
- Certificate for IEC61701:2011- Location plan
- EC Type Examination Certificate for EDMI Mk10A dated 23/04/2015 (JCM projectmonitoring point)- Evidence for authorization of signatories for the MoC
Category B documents (other documents referenced)- JCM_MV_AM001_ver01.0 Displacement of Grid and Captive Genset Electricity by Solar PV
System, Ver 01.0
- Additional Information to the Proposed Methodology Displacement of Grid and Captive
Genset Electricity by Solar PV System- JCM Project Cycle Procedure JCM_MV_PCP_ver02.0 and JCM_MV_PCP_ver03.0
14

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification JCM_MV_GL_VV_ver01.0- JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR JCM_MV_GL_PDD_MR_ver01.0 and
JCM_MV_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0- JCM Glossary of Terms JCM_MV_Glossary_ver01.0- JCM PDD Form JCM_MV_F_PDD_ver01.0- JCM MoC Statement Form JCM_MV_F_MoC_ver01.0- JCM Validation Report Form JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- Approved Small Scale CDM Methodology AMS I.D. Version 18.0 Grid connected renewableelectricity generation- Approved CDM Methodological Tool to calculate the Emission Factor for an electricity
system- Proposed and registered projects under CDM, VCS, Gold Standard, and the other international
schemes- IEC 62053-21, Electricity metering equipment (a,c,) - Particular requirements - Part 21: Static
meters for active energy (classes 1 and 2)- Metering Code, Energy Market Authority of Singapore, January 201415

JCM_MV_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers.
Certificate of Appointment is attached to this report.

16

Joint Crediting Mechanism Certificate of Appointment
Title of Project: Validation for Solar Power on Rooftop of School Building
Project

We hereby certify that the following personnel have engaged in the validation process thathas fully satisfied the competence requirements of the validation of the JCM project.

Name of Person

Assigned Roles

Michiaki Chiba

Team Leader

Stewart Niu

Technical Reviewer

Signed byMichiaki Chiba
Climate Change Manager – Asia & Pacific07/02/2018

Lloyd's Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries, including Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Limited (LRQA), and their respective
officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this Legal Section as 'Lloyd’s Register'. Lloyd’s Register assumes noresponsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in thisdocument or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd’s Register entity for the provision of thisinformation or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.

MSBSF43618

Revision 0, 20 November 2014