Airbus
Year ended the December 31, 2022

Independent verifier’s report on a selection of consolidated non-financial
information

EY & Associés

EY & AssociésTour FirstTSA 14444
92037 Paris-La Défense cedexTél. : +33 (0) 1 46 93 60 00
www.ey.com/frAirbus
Year ended December 31, 2022

Independent verifier’s report on a selection of consolidated non-financial information

To the Executive Committee,
In accordance with your request and in our capacity as independent verifier, member of the network of
one of the statutory auditors of Airbus (hereafter the “entity”), we present our report on a selection ofconsolidated non-financial information for the year ended December 31, 2022, comprising a selected
non-financial indicators1 that the entity has chosen to prepare in accordance with its procedures(hereafter the “Criteria”) presented in its Universal Registration Document 2022 (the “RegistrationDocument”).
Conclusion
Based on the processes put in place, as described in the Nature and scope of the work section, and thecollected evidence, we have not identified any material misstatement that causes us to believe that thenon-financial indicators have not been fairly presented in the Registration Document, in compliancewith the Criteria.
Remarks
The calculation methodology applied by the entity relating to electricity and water consumption
includes using estimates for the last quarter of the reporting year due to the unavailability of data at
the time of the reporting. This resulted in adjustments to the 2021 published indicator values in theRegistration Document.
Inherent limitations of the preparation of the consolidated non-financial Information
The information can be subject to an inherent uncertainty given the current scientific or economicknowledge, and the quality of external data used. Some information is sensitive to the methodologicalchoices, hypothesis used and/or estimations considered to establish the consolidated non-financial
information as presented in the Registration Document.

1 Selection of indicators presented in section “6.1.17 ESG Data Board” of the Registration Document” See detailed list in Annex 1.

S.A.S. à capital variable
817 723 687 R.C.S. Nanterre
Société de Commissaires aux Comptes
Société d'expertise comptable inscrite au Tableaude l'Ordre de la Région Paris - Ile-de-FranceSiège social : 1-2, place des Saisons - 92400 Courbevoie - Paris-La Défense 1

The entity’s responsibility
As part of this voluntary approach, it is the responsibility of the entity:
 to select the non-financial indicators it wishes to disclose as part of the Information and establish
the Criteria;
 to prepare the non-financial indicators in accordance with the Criteria, of which a summary isincluded in the Registration Document and available on request at the entity’s headquarters;
 to maintain internal controls it determines necessary to produce the consolidated non-financial
Information that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
The Registration Document has been prepared by applying the entity's Criteria as mentioned above.
Responsibility of the independent verifier
It is our role in response to the entity's request, based on our work, to express a limited assurance
conclusion on whether the consolidated non-financial information is fairly presented, in all material
aspects, in accordance with the Criteria.
Nonetheless, it is not our role to give an opinion on the entire Registration Document for the year
ended December 31, 2022 or on the compliance with other applicable legal provisions.
Independence and quality control
Our independence is defined by the French Code of Ethics (Code de déontologie) of our profession. Inaddition, we have implemented a quality control system, including documented policies and procedures
regarding compliance with ethical standards, professional standards and applicable laws and regulations.
Means and resources
Our verification works mobilized the skills of six people and took place between September 2022 andFebruary 2023 on a total duration of our works of about twenty-five weeks.
We conducted around 20 interviews with the persons responsible for the preparation of the report
including, in particular, the Health and Safety, Human Resources, Human Rights, Legal, Purchasing,Sustainability and Environment departments.
Nature and scope of the work
We conducted the work described below, taking into account the risk of material misstatement of theinformation, in accordance with the international standard ISAE 30002 and with professional
standards applicable in France.

2Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information

Airbus2Based on the processes put in place, the procedures we have carried out in the exercise of our
professional judgment enable us to provide a limited level of assurance:We assessed the suitability of the Criteria in terms of its relevance, comprehensiveness, reliability,neutrality and understandability by taking into consideration, if relevant, the best practices of theindustry.

We consulted source documents and conducted interviews to corroborate the non-financialindicators presented.

For the non-financial indicators, we implemented:


analytical procedures to verify the correct consolidation of the collected data as well as theconsistency of their evolutions;detailed tests based on samples, consisting of checking the correct application of the definitions
and procedures and reconciling the data with the supporting documents. This work was carried out
with a selection of contributing entities listed below for the environmental indicators: AI Toulouse,
Airbus Atlantic Nantes, AD Manching, AD Getafe – exCass, AI Getafe, AI Illescas, Airbus Atlantic
Méaulte, AH Albacete, AH Mexico Queretaro, AI Flight Test Function which cover between 20% and
28% of consolidated data selected for these tests (20% of water consumption, 25% of total waste
production, 28% of total energy consumption and 20% of total scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions for thereporting period 2022).

We assessed the overall consistency of the non-financial information with our knowledge of all theconsolidated entities.
We consider that the work we have performed by exercising our professional judgment allows us toexpress a limited assurance conclusion; an assurance of a higher level would have required more
extensive verification work.

Paris-La Défense, February 10, 2023
Independent Verifier
EY & Associés

Frédéric Papon
Partner, SustainabilityAirbus3Annex 1
Business integrity
Number of E&C e-learning sessions delivered to employees
Number of data privacy e-learning sessions delivered to employees
Diversity & Human resources
Active workforce (by segment, geographical area, age, gender)
Women in total active workforce
Total training hours
Number of classroom training
Number of digital training
Environment
Total energy consumption (excluded electricity generated by CHP on site for own use)
Energy intensity (per Total Revenues)
Energy consumption from stationary sources
Energy consumption from non-renewable sources
Energy consumption from renewable or low-carbon sources
Energy consumption from mobile sources
Total Scope 1 + Scope 2 GHG emissions
Total Scope 1 + Scope 2 GHG emissions related to TCO defined scope
Total direct GHG emissions (Scope 1)
Total indirect GHG emissions (Scope 2)
Scope 1&2 GHG intensity (per Total Revenues)
Indirect GHG emissions – Category 6 - Business Travel (Scope 3)
Indirect GHG emissions - Category 11 - Use of Sold Products - Comm. aircraft, IEA-SDS SAF uptake
GHG efficiency for delivered commercial aircraft (as per SBTi-validated target)
Indirect GHG emissions - Category 11 - Use of Sold Products - Comm. aircraft, “no SAF” scenario
GHG efficiency for delivered commercial aircraft (“no SAF” scenario)
Indirect GHG emissions - Category 11 - Use of Sold Products – Other products
Indirect GHG emissions - Category 1 - Purchased Goods and Services
Total VOC emissions
Total water withdrawal (note: formerly reported as “consumption”)
Total water consumption related to TCO defined scope
Total waste production, excluding exceptional waste
Material recovery rate
Respect for human rights
Number of participants who have completed e-learning modules on human rights and modern slavery
Health & Safety
Rolling 12 months Employee Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate
Employee Lost Time Severity rate
Training hours dedicated to Health and Safety
Number of employees trained on Health and Safety
Number of executives that attended an “Leadership Masterclass on Environment and Health & Safety”
Number of employees having attended "EHS Certificate" modules 1&2
Product Safety
Fatal Accident Rate 10 year moving average fatal accident rate (per million flights) - for entire industry
Percentage of SMS officers nominated
Percentage of SMS officers trained
Supply Chain
Percentage of identified high risk suppliers, who have undergone a sustainability assessment

Airbus4