INDC(NDS)-204
D i s t r . : G+Sp

International Atomic Energy Agency

IN DC

INTERNATIONAL

NUCLEARDATA

COMMITTEE

Report on the
9th IAEA Consultants• Meeting of
THE NUCLEAR REACTION DATA CENTRES

hosted by the US National Nuclear Data Centerat the Brookhaven National Laboratory
2 7 - 2 9 October 1987

Including the 20th FOUR-CENTRES MEETING of the NEUTRON DATA CENTRES
and the 10th MEETING ON CHARGED PARTICLE NUCLEAR DATA COMPILATION

April 1988

IAEA NUCLEAR DATA SECTION, WAGRAMERSTRASSE 5, A-1400 VIENNAINDC(NDS)-204
Distr.: G+Sp

Report on the
9th IAEA Consultants' Meeting of
THE NUCLEAR REACTION DATA CENTRES
hosted by the US National Nuclear Data Centerat the Brookhaven National Laboratory
27 - 30 October 1987

Including the 20th FOUR-CENTRES MEETING of the NEUTRON DATA CENTRES
and the 10th MEETING ON CHARGED PARTICLE NUCLEAR DATA COMPILATION

Edited by H.D. Lemmel
with contributions from N. Holden and J.J. Schmidt
April 1988

Abstract:
This report summarizes the 1987 co-ordination meeting of the nationaland regional nuclear reaction data centers, convened by the IAEA at
regular intervals. The main topics are-

the international exchange of nuclear reaction data by means ofthe "EXFOR" system, and the further development of this system,
the "CINDA" system as an international index and bibliography toneutron reaction data,
the sharing
compilation,

-

of

the

workloadforspeedyandreliabledata

the exchange and documentation of evaluated data libraries in
ENDF format,

with the goal of rendering data center services to data users in IAEA
Member States by means of computer retrievals and printed materials.

Printed by the IAEA in Austria
April 1988
88-03446

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
5

Introduction

7

Glossary of abbreviations

9

The network of nuclear reaction data centers

11

List of participants

13

Agenda15

List of working papers

17

Minutes41

Conclusions, Actions

Appendices
Status reports

59
89

95
103
111

113
119
125

NNDC
NEA-DB

NDS
CJD
CAJaO
CDFE
RIKEN
CNOC

Working Papers. Of the working papers (see p.12)
the following are included in the present document:
WP3

Summary of important errors found by NDS in
EXFOR TRANS tapes

C.L. Dunford: Summary of charged particle data collections

Introduction

This report summarizes the 9th IAEA Consultants* Meeting of the
Nuclear Reaction Data Centers (NRDC), which was hosted by the US National
Nuclear Data Center at the Brookhaven National Laboratory. The meeting
was scheduled for 27-29 October; but due to the heavy agenda the meeting
continued on 30 October.
For the network of the eight co-operating centers see page 7. At thepresent meeting three additional centers were represented as observers.
the Photon and Charged Particle Data Center of the US National
Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD.,
the Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, NM.,
the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, CA.
See the list of participants on page 9.
The present NRDC meeting was the ninth in a series of which the last,which took place in 1985 at the OECD/NEA Data Bank, is documented in
INDC(NDS)-178. The present meeting was also successor to a "Technical
NRDC Meeting" which took place at the IAEA in Vienna in 1986 and which is
documented in Memo CP-D/1S9.
The agenda of the meeting concentrated onmatters of co-ordination, determination of priorities andworkload distribution among the centers for the compilation andevaluation of nuclear data in view of the changing data needs
andincreasing
accuracyrequirementsforthevariousapplications of nuclear technologies, and on
technical matters concerning the further development
jointly operated computerized systemsof theCINDA -

bibliography and data index for neutron data, publishedby IAEA on behalf of the co-operating centers;

EXFOR -

system for experimental data of nuclear reactions
induced by neutrons, photons, charged particles or
heavy ions;

ENDF -

system for evaluated neutron data, originally designed
for fission reactor calculations, now being widened in
scope
for
other
applicationssuchasfusion,radiotherapy, neutron-source reactions and others;

WRENDA - compilation of requests for such nuclear data that are
known with insufficient accuracy compared to theaccuracy requirements in nuclear technologies.

Some of the highlights of the meeting are:Release for distribution of new data libraries incl. ENDF/B-6
standardreference data, the USSR datalibrary BROND,
fission-product yield data libraries from China and Japan, andothers;Co-operationin data evaluationforradio-isotopes for medical applications;theproductionofSupport of the nuclear data centers for the IAEA Co-ordinatedResearch Programme on the evaluation of fission-product yielddata;
The provision of data
Personal Computers;

files andcomputer codes for use on

On-linecomputer
links
among
data-centersandbetweendata-centers and users, and resulting changes in data-center
services including changes in the publication schedule of CINDA;
Adaption of the EXFOR system to new data types occuring inmedium energy nuclear data of which the importance is increasing.

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONSBNLBrookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, N.Y., USA

CAJaD

Center for Nuclear Structure and Reaction Data, Kurchatov
Institute, Moscow, USSR

CDFE

Centr Dannykh Fotojad. Eksp., Moscow State University, USSR

CINDA

A specialized bibliography and data index on neutron
nuclear data operated jointly by NNDC, NEA-DB, NDS and CJD

CJD

USSR Nuclear Data Center at F.E.I., Obninsk, USSR

CNDC

Chinese Nuclear Data Center, Beijing, P.R. China

CPL

Computer Program Library of NEA-DB

CPND

Charged-particle nuclear reaction data

CRP

CoordinatedSection

CSEWG

US Cross-Section Evaluation Working GroupCSISRS

Cross-Section Information Storage and Retrieval System, the
EXFOR-compatible internal system of NNDC

DOE

US Department of Energy

DOE-NDC

Nuclear Data Committee of DOE

ENDF-6

International format for evaluated data exchange, version 6

ENDF/B-6

US Evaluated Nuclear Data File, version 6

ENSDF

Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File

EXFOR

Format for the international exchange of nuclear reaction
data

FEI

Fiziko-Energeticheskij Institut, Obninsk, USSR

FIZ

Information Center of the Fed. Rep. of Germany for energy,
physics, mathematics, Karlsruhe, Fed. Rep. of Germany

GKAE

UUSR State Committee on the Utilization of Atomic Energy,
Moscow, USSR

IAEA

International Atomic Energy Agency

INDC

International Nuclear Data Committee

INDL

The IAEA Nuclear
reaction data

INIS

International Nuclear Information System

IRDF

The International Reactor Dosimetry File, maintained by the
IAEA/NDS

ITERInternational Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor

JEF

The Joint Evaluated File of neutron data, a collaborationof European NEA member countries and JapanKACHAPAG

Charged Particle Nuclear Data Group, Karlsruhe, Fed. Rep.
of Germany

LANL

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M., USA

Research Programme of the IAEA Nuclear Data

Data

Libraryforevaluated

neutronLEXFORPart of the EXFOR manual containing physics information forcompilers

LIJaF

Leningrad Nuclear Physics Inst., Gatchina

NOS

IAEA Nuclear Data Section, Vienna, Austria

NEA

Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD, Paris, France

NEACRP

Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on Reactor Physics

NEA-DBNEA Data Bank, Saclay, France

NEANDC

Nuclear Data Committee of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

NEUDADA

Neutron Data Direct Access.
included in EXFOR

NND

Neutron Nuclear Data

NNDC

National
NuclearLaboratory, USA

NNDEN

Neutron Nuclear Data Evaluation Newsletter

NRDC

the Nuclear Reaction Data Centers

NSDD

Nuclear structure and decay data

NSR

Nuclear structure references, a bibliographic system

OECD

Organization for
Paris, France

PC

Personal Computer

ORNL

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA

PhDC

Photonuclear Data Center, Washington, USA

PhND

Photonuclear data

RIKEN

Nuclear Data Group, RIKEN Inst. of Phys. and Chem. Res.,
Wako-Shi, Saitama, Japan

SGIP

Study Group for Information Processing, Sapporo, JapanSOKRATORUSSR evaluated neutron
included in INDL

TRANS

Name of transmission tapes for data exchange in the EXFOR
system

TUD

Technical University, Dresden, German Democratic Republic

WRENDA

World Request List for Nuclear Data

Data

Earlier data file of NEA, now

Center,Economic

Brookhaven

Cooperation

data

libraryand(andNational

Development,

format),now

The network of Nuclear Reaction Data Centers
National and regional nuclear reaction data centers, co-ordinated by
the International Atomic Energy Agency, co-operate in the compilation,exchange and dissemination of nuclear reaction data, in order to meet therequirements of nuclear data users in all countries. A brief summary ofthe data centers network is given below.

The nuclear reaction data centers:
NNDC
NEA-DB
NDS
CJD
CAJaD
CDFE
R1KEN
CNDC
KACHAPAG
FI2
PhDC- US National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven, USA- OECD/NEA Nuclear Data Bank, Saclay, France- IAEA Nuclear Data Section- USSR Centr po Jadernym Dannym (= Nuclear Data Centre),
Obninsk, USSR
- USSR Centr po Dannym o Stroenii Atomnogo Jadra i
Jadernykh Reakcikh (= Nuclear Structure and Nuclear
Reaction Data Centre), Moscow, USSR
- Centr Dannykh Fotojad. Eksp. (= Centre for Experimental
Photonuclear Data), Moscow, USSR
- Nuclear Data Group, RIKEN Inst. of Phys. and Chem. Res.,
Wako-Shi, Japan- Chinese Nuclear Data Centre, Beijing, P.R. of. China- Karlsruhe Charged Particle Group, Karlsruhe, FRG*)- Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, FRG- Photonuclear Data Center, Washington, USA

These data centres cooperate on the following projects:
1.

Neutron Nuclear Datal.aBibliography and Data Index "CINDA":
Input prepared by NEA-DB, NNDC, NDS, CJD
Handbooks published by IAEA

l.bExperimental data exchanged in EXFOR format:
Input prepared by NNDC, NEA-DB, NDS, CJD

l.c

Data Handbooks based on EXFOR published by NNDC

l.d

Evaluated data exchanged in ENDF format:
NNDC, NEA-DB, NDS, CJD and othersl.eComputer retrieval services upon request of customers:
NNDC, NEA-DB, NDS, CJD

l.f

WRENDA: compilation of requested data that are known withinsufficient accuracy.
Compiled by NNDC, NEA-DB, NDS, CJD,
published by IAEA

10

2.

3.

Charged Particle Nuclear Data (including heavy-ion reaction data)
2.aBibliography published by NNDC

2.b

Numerical data exchanged in EXFOR format:
Input prepared by CAJaD, RIKEN, CNDC, NDS, NNDC, KACHAPAG*)

2.c

Data Handbooks based on EXFOR published by FIZ/KACHAPAG*)

2.d

Computer retrieval services upon request of customers:
NNDC, NEA-DB, NDS, CAJaD

Photonuclear Data
3.a

Numerical data exchanged in EXFOR format:
Input
preparedbyCDFE,
occasional
NNDC(PhDC), NDS

contributions

from3.b. Bibliography published by CDFE
3.c*)

Computer retrieval services upon request of customers:
NNDC, NEA-DB, NDS, CAJaD

Discontinued in 1982.
activities.

Since then CAJaD has increased its compilation

11

9th IAEA Consultants* Meetingof theNUCLEAR REACTION DATA CENTERS MEETING
October 27 - 29, 1987
National Nuclear Data Center
Brookhaven National Laboratory

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
Cai Dunjiu

Chinese Nuclear Data Center
Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China

Chukreev, F.E.

Center for Nuclear Structure and Reaction Data
I.V. Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, U.S.S.R.

Dunford, C.L.

N.N.D.C.

Hashizume, Akire

Nuclear Data GroupRIKEN Inst. of Physical & Chemical Research,
Sitama, Japan

Holden, N.R.

N.N.D.C.

Hubbell, John

Photon & Charged Particle Data Center
National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD

Lentmel, H.D.

I.A.E.A. Nuclear Data Section
Vienna, Austria

Manokhin, V.N.

Center for Nuclear Data
Fiziko-Energeticheskij Institut, Obninsk, U.S.S.R.

McLane, V.

N.N.D.C.

Nordborg, C.

Nuclear Energy Agency Data Bank
Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Pearlstein, S.

N.N.D.C.

Schmidt, J.J.

I.A.E.A. Nuclear Data Section
Vienna, Austria

Siciliano, E.R.

Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM

Tubbs, N.

Nuclear Energy Agency Data Bank
Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Warshaw, S.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA

Whetstone, S.

D.O.E. Division of Nuclear Physics, Washingston, D.C.

Zhuang Youxiang

Chinese Nuclear Data Center (currently at the N.N.D.C.)
Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China

13

9th IAEA Consultants' Meetingof theNUCLEAR REACTION DATA CENTERS MEETING
October 27 - 29, 1987
National Nuclear Data Center
Brookhaven National Laboratory
AGENDA
Tues.

Wed.

Wed.

General session
1.

Opening, election of chairman, adoption of agenda.

2.

Status reports by participants.

3.

Brief report on 1987 INDC Meeting in Beijing and actions fromthe 1986 INDC Meeting. (See extracts from INDC/P(87)-6)

4.

Commitments and cooperation of centers, assessment of present
work, scope, priorities, EXFOR/CINDA completeness.
(See Memo 4C-3/315: CINDA and EXFOR statistics,
CP-D/159, p.9: Compilation scope)Technical Session: General
5.

Review of actions from previous meeting.
(See CP-D/159, P.10-13: EXFOR general, actions)

6.

The EXFOR System: rules, manual, dictionaries, proposals, etc.
Part. 1. (See WP1:EXFOR; WP3: Summary of TRANS tape errors)

7.

Discussions with U.S. observers.

Technical session: CPND and Photonuclear data
8.

Compilation and exchange of CPND, experiences with TRANS tapes.
Review of conclusions and actions from previous meeting.

9-

Evaluated CPND in ENDF-6 format.

10.

Photonuclear data.

11.

Publications, CPND bibliography.

12.

Stopping power.

13.

Coordination of compilation and evaluation of CPND for medical
and radioisotopes production. (See CP-D/164).

14.

Photonuclear data evaluation for ENDF/B-6.

15.

Nuclear model codes, availability, documentation and customer
services.

14

Thurs.

Fri.

General session: Planning and coordination

16.

Customer services, handbooks planned.

17.

Planning and coordination of future specialists1 meetings on
nuclear data. (See Memo CP-D/158 and INDC/P(87)-13)

18.

Center-to-center on-line data transmission.

19.

CINDA publication, new 'archival1 issue.
(See Memos 4C-3/314 and 4C-1/193)

20.

Important neutron data not covered in EXFOR.

21.

Medium-energy nuclear data.

22.

Coordinationoffission-productyieldcompilation
evaluation, computation format. (See Memo 4C-3/317)

23.

Coordination of neutron data evaluation.

24.

Mito Meeting, presentation on EXFOR.

25.

Dates of the 1988 Technical NRDC Meeting in Vienna and the 10th
NROC Meeting in 1989 in Vienna.

26.

Miscellaneous, conclusions.

(See BNL-NCS-4OO7O)

Technical session: Neutron nuclear data
27.

CINDA: coverage, decentralized network, etc.
(See WP2: pending CINDA matters)

28.

WRENDA.

29.

EXFOR (remaining items from 6.)
Isomeric states, transliteration of Cyrillic characters.

30.

Exchange of EXFOR, experiences with TRANS tapes.

31.

Evaluated data files.

(See IAEA-NDS-90 for BROND file)

32. ENDF/B processing computer codes.
33. Miscellaneous, conclusions, etc.

and

15

List of Working Papers

For the status reports by the centers see the appendices to thisdocument.
The discussions were based-on the conclusions and actions of the 8th NRDC Meeting 1985, seereport INDC(NDS)-178,-

on the conclusions and actions of the 1986 Technical NRDC Meeting,see Memo CP-D/159,-

on the actions arising from the 15th INDC Meeting, see report
INDC/P(87)-6,-

and on the 4C-Memos
during the past year.

and CP-Memos

The results of discussions
Actions of the present meeting.

areexchanged

includedinamong the centerstheConclusions andAdditional working papers:
WP1

Pending EXFOR matters.
EXFOR conclusions.

Not appended to this document.

See theWP2

Pending CINDA matters. (See also Memo 4C-3/318.)
this document. See the CINDA conclusions.

WP3

Summary of important errors found by NDS in EXFOR TRANS tapes.
See page 139.

Not appended toIntroductory pages to: Neutron Cross-Sections, Vol. 2: Curves (NNDC).
Not appended to this document.
Summary of the meeting of the medium energy nuclear data working group,
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, 27-29 May 1987.
See BNL-NCS-4OO7O.
Summary of charged particle data collections (NNDC).
document.

See page 141 of thisComputer program abstracts: Nuclear model and related computer codes(NEA-DB). Not appended to this document. An updated version will
be distributed soon.
Nuclear and atomic data meetings for 1988-1990 (NDS). See INDC/P(87)-13.
Index of data libraries available on magnetic
IAEA-NDS-7 Rev. 87/10.
Index to the IAEA-NDS-Documentation Series.

tape from

IAEA/NDS.

See

See IAEA-NDS-0 Rev. 87/10.

16

BROND - USSR evaluated neutron data library (CJD).
Some measurements of charged-particle
appended to this document.

See IAEA-NDS-9O.

nuclear reaction data (CNDC).

Not

Overview of the facilities and measurements in China (CNDC). Not appended
to this document. Compare the report "Nuclear data research in
the P.R. of China", INDC(CPR)-11.
and others.

17

M I N U T E S

Ninth NRDC Meeting
Brookhaven National Laboratory. USA. 27-30 October 1987
The Ninth NRDC Meeting was hosted by the National Nuclear Data
Center, BNL, USA.
Charles Dunford from the NNDC chaired the meeting,Norman Holden and Vicky McLane acted as local secretaries, H.D. Lemmel as
scientific secretary of the meeting. The list of participants is given
on page 9. During lunch times guided visits of selected BNL facilities
were offered to meeting participants, on Wednesday to the National
Synchrotron Light Source, and on Thursday to the High Flux Reactor.

1.

Opening
The meeting was opened by Dr. Blume, one of the Deputy Directors of
BNL, a solid state physicist.
Agenda: The IAEA Specialists Meeting on Nuclear Data Correlations andCovariance Data, Rome, November 1986 was added to Agenda Item 17.
The finally adopted agenda is reproduced on page 10. The list ofconclusions and actions resulting from the meeting is given on page38.

2.

Status reports by participants
Lemmel/NDS: Status report see Appendix 3.
McLane/NNDC; Status report see Appendix 1.
Hashizume/RIKEN: Status report see Appendix 6.
Manokhin/CJD: Status report see Appendix 4.
Some details:
Experimental Data. CJD developed his own computation format similar
to that by Red Cullen; format allows conversion from EXFOR and ENDF-B.
CINDA. In the first half of 1988, a master file for area 4 will besent to NDS.
For the second half of 1988, they hope for a fully
decentralized input into CINDA. Hundred EXFOR entries are not yet in
CINDA, they hope to enter them before the end of 1987. They will try
to send very often linked CINDA and EXFOR entries to NDS.
They
detected a lot of errors and discrepancies; 9000 corrected records
were sent to NDS last year. CJD intends to send Blokhin in September
1988 to NDS for corrections, errors, erroneous codes, etc. in CINDA,
in time close to the next NRDC meeting 1988 in Vienna.
BROND. They used FISCON and CHEQUER programmes for the checking of
the BROND data. Additional errors were detected with the GRUKON andNJOY codes. BROND is now processed by GRUKON and NJOY into 26 and300 MGCS, For checking they used version V of FISCON and CHEQUER.
Dunford mentioned that version VI of these codes contains many
improvements in checking procedures.
CJD should get the latest
versions, perform new checks and report the experiences to NNDC.

18

BOSPOR. An improved library for threshold reactions, BOSPOR '86, hasbeen developed.
Nuclear theory developments concern mostly nuclear level densities,
multistep reactions and precompound decay.
Publications. A special issue of "Nuclear Constants" was issued
covering evaluation activities in Socialist countries.
WRENDA.
14 Soviet requests are considered fulfilled and were
removed, the others are not yet fulfilled and will continue to figure
in WRENDA 87/88.
Future. CJD will move to another building. At the end of 1988 they
intend to replace the current computer with a new computer, EC 1066,with more powerful magnetic tape and magnetic disk units. This
computer will be compatible with IBM and will be fully at CJD
disposal.
Presently they use an EC 1045 computer in anotherdepartment for CINDA, this computer is not powerful enough to have afull CINDA system operating.
Chukreev/CAJaD: Status report see Appendix 5.

Some details:

After the last NRDC meeting most activities concerned medical nuclear
data.
A transtape with radioisotope production data will be
distributed next week.
Chukreev expressed some concern withmeasurement units, particularly regarding stopping powers and thicktarget yields. The nuclear activation data handbook contains unusual
thick target yields, and Chukreev was concerned that the users will
not be pleased with these data.
A paper on neutron yields from (o,n) reactions on Li, Be and 0 for
a-energies up to 10 MeV has recently been published; the data areevaluated but coded in EXFOR-format. Dunford suggested that it would
be a very interesting international contribution if they would put
these data also into the charged particle format of ENDF/B-VI.
Chukreev mentioned the book by Anderson from IBM on stopping power
data, recently published by Academic Press. Dunford mentioned areview of stopping power data at the last CSEWG meeting by Perkins
from Livermore. Pearlstein enquired about the range of input of
CAJaD stopping power data. Chukreev replied that the heavy ion data
are very bad, and that the p and a particle beam data were morereliable. Upon enquiry by Pearlstein into the reference on this workby CAJaD, Chukreev replied that there was no publication on stopping
power data by his center. The data differed from those in thehandbook by Ziegler, because they used different input data. They do
not intend to publish these stopping power data. Lemmel mentioned
the CPND data base for light ions for fusion applications recently
developed by TU Graz and published as report INDC(AUS)-12/G.
Tubbs/NEA Data Bank: Status report see Appendix 2.

Some details:

In the last year, NEA member states came strongly out in support ofnuclear data activities of NEADB assigning highest priority to JEF.

19

JEF release would probably be in 1990. One full manyear was put on
U-238 evaluation; this presents a particular evaluation bottleneck.
Benchmarking of JEF required quite a lot of work.
The new NEADB activity in thermochemical data has strong support frommember states and gains in momentum. They co-operate with CODATA andhave currently three evaluation teams working on U(long effort), Am
and Tc.
15 % of computer code distribution goes to non-OECD countries. The
return of those countries in terms of new computer codes is not thatlarge.
Some programs were obtained from China, furthermore the
FEDGROUP versions of Vertes and Trkov, respectively.
At the end of 1988, NEADB is supposed to get a new 8700 computer.
Manokhin enquired into the comparison of evaluated data under the JEF
project. Tubbs responded that they adopted the philosophy that an
optimum benchmark is better than optimum evaluated data files, aphilosophy which was doubted by Manokhin. Lemmel mentioned thatintercomparison of data files by people not directly associated with
their evaluation are not of a great impact and interest.
Cai Dun.iiu/CNDC: Status report see Appendix 7. The second version of
CENDL, CENDL-2, is planned to be completed in 1990.
CDFE: The status
Appendix 8.

3.

report

by

CDFE

was

availablein writing,see

Report on the 16th INDC Meeting. Beijing, and actions resulting fromthis and the last IHDC meetings
Schmidt reported briefly on the major data-center-related discussions
and recommendations of the 16th INDC meeting held in Beijing, 19-23
October 87. He mentioned in particular that the proposed publication(proposed by NNDC) of a final CINDA archival handbook covering theyears 1935-1986 was approved by the Committee.

4.

Commitments and co-operation of data centers etc. - selected notes
Pearlstein started the discussion by mentioning that the nuclear
power programme in the US is slowing down. Nevertheless, NNDC isable to keep up with the traditional CZNDA and EXFOR activities.
Less funding was received for evaluation, but the well co-ordinated
CSEWG represented still a viable effort. The compilation of CPND is
increasing in importance, both at low energy (neutron and other beamsources), in medical radioisotope production, and at high energy for
defence and space applications. After the space shuttle disaster,
the space organisations would like to make sure for larger spaceflights, say, of 1-2 year duration e.g. to the Mars, that astronauts
be well protected against space radiation; analysis of spaceradiation would need additional CPND. In conclusion, NNDC feels that
CPND data compilation must be taken up, without impairing the neutron
data compilation. Even if Kachapag had deceased, there are still
efforts available such as RIKEN, CNDC and in particular CAJaD, and a

20 -new effort in Los Alamos. NNDC would be prepared to help toco-ordinate CPND compilation as much as possible.
Pearlstein
reminded that ENDF-formats will also accommodate evaluated CPND.
Co-ordination should not necessarily be limited to experimental CPNO
only. Schmidt emphasized that it would be realistic, in view of thelimited manpower available, to restrict compilation and evaluation
activities to well-defined CPND for well-defined and limited
applications. Also, the help of outside experts in evaluation should
be ensured. Hashizume and Chukreev both underlined the importance ofCP monitor reactions for medical radioisotope production.
In conclusion it was felt, that data bases in CPND are presently
rather poor, but that CPND compilation and evaluation should be anarea of increasing cooperation between the data centers, without
imposing on any cooperating data center the obligation to participate
in the CPND compilation activities.
Two points which Pearlstein mentioned seem worthwhile to retain.
Medical people did not put much emphasis on medical data so far,because they are afraid of the size of support needed for medical
data which would compete heavily with the size of their own funds.
The many manyears the data centers devoted to neutron data forreactors they consider a deterring example.
The second remark:Whetstone (USDOE) wished to maintain the special ability of the data
centers in the compilation and handling of data. This is one of thereasons why USDOE maintains its support for NNDC. Schmidt mentioned
the usefulness of the data center experience in nuclear data forother data fields.
The atomic data centers for example havepartially adopted an EXFOR-like format for the compilation ofexperimental atomic data.
A similar example was mentioned by
Manokhin. The thermo-dynamical data center at Obninsk uses the EXFOR
format.
Finally Pearlstein underlined the vested interest of NNDC in the NSDD
data
compilations.
He appreciatedthe help from IAEA for
participation in meetings, and mentioned his travels to China andIndia designed to encourage participation of these countries in the
NSDD effort.

5.

Review of actions from previous meeting
As next point on the agenda, the actions from the last NRDC meetingwere reviewed (ref.: CP-D/159, p. 12 f.)
A number of actions was done since the last NRDC meeting, a number
was continued as standing actions, a number was referred to further
discussion in the technical sessions.
Highlights from the discussion during the review of actions
During the preparation of the new BNL-325 handbook, NNDC compiled
also entries from the other areas into the EXFOR series 6, 7 and 8.
An action was put on NNDC to send these entries to the other data
centers for update. The new "barnbook" is ready and could go very
shortly to the printer provided that contract difficulties with
Academic Press are being solved.

21

The Dimitriev handbook is not available in computerized form,
however, the majority of the data was put into EXFOR, some data were
not put into EXFOR because they are considered not to be exact.
Usually such a book, before publication, would have to be submitted
for review and approval to the USSR Standards Committee. This was
not done in this case. Lemmel enquired whether there were any
copy-right problems regarding the translation of this book into
English. Manokhin was not informed about any copy-right problems
concerning Dimitriev1s book.
Participating data centers
Pages 9.5 and 9.6 in the NNDC EXFOR Manual, version 87-1, werereviewed concerning the data centers participating in the NRDC
network. An action was put on NDS to enquire with Tanaka, whether hewould intend to stay in the NRDC network or not, since that group has
not provided any contributions in the past years. The intention
would be to exclude this group from the network rather than keep it
unless there are real contributions into the EXFOR system made or to
be expected. NNDC would have to correct Ishkanov to Varlamov as thehead of the Moscow Photonuclear Data Center. Once they will makeregular contributions to the systems, Reid-Glasgow, Warshaw-LLNL and
Siciliano-Los Alamos should appear on page 9.6. Behrens from FIZ
Karlsruhe, FRG, wants to be kept informed of NRDC discussions, butdoes no more want to participate in NRDC meetings. The address of
the NBS Photonuclear Data Center should be changed to Gaithersburg.
Dearnaley and Marchinkowski should be removed from the list.
Dragovitsch/Desy, Hamburg, contacted Chukreev for CPND data, and isinterested in co-operation with CAJaD. Chukreev has recommended him
to contact Behrens/Karlsruhe and NDS Vienna, but neither he himself
nor Karlsruhe nor Vienna have obtained any additional information inthis case. Dunford felt that the main contact for CPND participants
should be NDS.
Finally, an action was put on all data centers, to provide electronicor other mail addresses to NNDC to be added to the addresses of the
co-operating centers.
6.

The EXFOR System
The discussions on the EXFOR System were based on Working Papers 1
and 3. Numerous conclusions and actions were agreed upon which aresummarized further below under Conclusions and Actions.
Pearlstein mentioned that some of the errors in transmission tapes
escape the checking codes. He wondered whether all centers check inthe same way the same errors by their checking codes. After somediscussion it was concluded that, when an error is found in thetransmission, which is not simply cosmetic, it should be included as
an item to be checked by the checking codes and used for updating theexisting checking codes of the data centers. Also, compilers shouldbe educated so as to avoid such errors in future compilation.

22

7.

Discussions with US observers
E. Sieiliano from the T2 Division (Nuclear Data Group) of Los Alamos
National Laboratory, reported on phase I of a three-phase project forthe build-up of a medium-energy nuclear data library (HENDLIB). Workon phase I is documented in the report LA-11085-MS by E.R. Siciliano
and E.D. Arthur, issued October 1987. This library would containpublishedmedium-energy
experimental
data
from
measuredcharged-particle and meson-induced nuclear scattering and reactions,and is intended to serve the basic and applied needs of themedium-energy nuclear physics community. Phase I of this project
involves compilation of nucleon and pion induced reaction data fromthe Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility (LAMPF), Phase II would include
nucleon and pion data from other medium-energy facilities, and Phase
III electron, light ion, and possibly kaon and anti-nucleon data.
Concerning input into HENDLIB, Siciliano mentioned 300-800 MeV proton
data, 400 HeV pion data coming from LAMPF. Also, neutron source datafrom the Los Alamos Weapons Neutron Research Facility (WNRF) will
come on-line. The Meson Facility at Vancouver produced protons up to
400 MeV and pions. The Bates Facility at MIT produces medium energy
electron data. Siciliano emphasized that the medium energy community
is a community in itself between low and high energy communities anddeserves its own services. It covers essentially the energy range
between about 100 MeV and 1 GeV.
Phase I of this project is proposed to demonstrate the feasibility of
MENDLIB with the existing software and computer resources. The mainemphasis is at present to make the first data available to LAMPF
users and to develop on-line retrieval capabilities and user-friendly
data base management.
They co-operate with many experimental
physicists in this project. As to the time table of Phase I: insummer 1988, a meeting with the LAMPF Director is planned on thecontinuation and future directions of the project. The feasibiliby
of MENDLIB will have to be demonstrated up to that time. The supportof Phase I comes from LAMPF in terms of computer help (VAX), T2 helps
in the development of user interface. The total manpower involved in
the first year of Phase I is about 1 MY/Y plus 20 % of Siciliano'stime. Most of this is programming manpower, a bit of it physics
manpower.
In the discussion, Siciliano pointed out that the size of the user
community is between 400-800 people world-wide. The third phase of
the project would also include facilities outside the USA. Theinterest would be in all masses of outgoing particles and in energy
losses up to 30 MeV. The lower energy limit is 100 MeV for protons,
for pions about 20 MeV. There is only a small overlap with medical
data, e.g. for protons up to 250 MeV. They are now in the middle ofPhase I. This is the only ongoing nuclear data effort for medium
energies all over the world, with the exception of the medium-energy
nuclear data meetings convened by NNDC. Schmidt offered help inaccessing non-OECD laboratories, e.g. in the USSR, China, and India,
at the time when the project will have reached Phase III. As to thesize of the MENDLIB, it appears that each experiment has a large
number of data points comparable to that produced in one typical setof Linac measurements. There will be only a very limited overlap

23with the elementary particle compilations of CERN/Geneva.
Theirlower energy limit is 1 GeV, whereas for MENDLIB 1 GeV will be theupper limit.
Chukreev mentioned that the Institute of High Energy Physics of the
USSR Academy of Sciences in Protvino near Serpuchov has compiled many
proton and pion-production data. It would have many interesting data
for the Los Alamos MENDLIB Project. The Head of the compilationgroup, "KOMPASS", is Dr. V.V. Ezhela. An action was put on Chukreev
to inform Dr. Ezhela of the planned Los Alamos effort and its
interest in an exchange of data. Dunford emphasized that compilation
formats should be developed in close contact with the EXFOR effort of
the NRDC. One should keep each other informed.
Hashizume promised to inform Dr. Siciliano of the Japanese effort andfacilities which could be approached for contributions to MENDLIB in
Phase III of the project. Zhuang Youxiang and Cai Dun.iiu mentionedthat perhaps data may come from the Lanzhou Heavy Ion Accelerator
currently under construction. They promised to inform Siciliano of
any Chinese activities in the medium energy data field.
The next presentation was given by Steve Warshaw from Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory on a new project in photonuclear datacompilation, which had started about 1.5 y ago with the compilationof 150 experimental data sets for Fe isotopes. The compilation ismeant to provide the data bases for evaluation.
They areparticularly interested in looking into the consistency of theavailable experimental data. All atomic masses will be covered andenergies from keV-140 MeV (meson threshold). The data are sparce andscattered, particularly above the giant dipole resonance.
Thiseffort would have its Soviet counterparts in Drs. A.I. Abramov fromFEI Obninsk and Varlamov from the Photonuclear Data Center at the
Moscow State University. The user community this project aims at, isconcerned with shielding studies, medical accelerator problems,
radiation protection of space shuttle personnel, fusion reactor
blankets and other applications.
John Hubble from the National Bureau of Standards reported on theactivities of the Photon and Charged- Particle Data Center at
Gaithersburg, NBS. This data center was created as a merger of theprevious photonuclear data center under Ed Fuller and the NBS Charged
Particle Data Center. It is directed by Dr. Martin Berger. Hubble
mentioned the set of 15 volumes on photonuclear data publishedsuccessively by Henry Gerstenberg. G. is retired and would be thecontact for these handbooks. The new data center works in contact
with the Livermore photonuclear data effort.
Hubble himself has alibrary of photon attenuation coefficients for energies between 1 keV- 100 GeV. These data are stored on disks. NDS and the Photonuclear
Data Center in Moscow would be interested in these data. NBS would
be interested in a feed-back from these two data centers.
Chukreev took the occasion to thank Hubble for the previous dataexchange, under which NBS had sent many data to the Photonuclear Data
Center in Moscow. The Soviet scientists actually used these data andappreciated their high quality. Hubble mentioned that for Si there
are large errors in scattering cross sections between 30 - 50 keV;

24also no attenuation coefficient data are available between 0.5 and 6
keV through the K-edge.
Hubble went on to mention two future conferences which would be ofinterest to the NRDC network. The first is a Session on Atomic andRadiation Data and Applications (session organiser John Hubble), tobe organised on Tuesday, 17th November 1987, at the forthcoming
ANS-meeting in Los Angeles. The second is the 4th International
Symposium on Radiation Physics, planned to take place in Sao Paulo,
Brazil, 3-7 October 1988.
Pearlstein reminded the meeting that yesterday's discussion revealeda shift in the interest of nuclear data compilation from neutron
nuclear data to CPND. Medium energy data are of particular interestfor intense neutron sources, space protection, shielding, radiation
damageresearch, andother applications.
He mentionedthemeasurements of medium energy proton data up to 200 MeV currently
underway at two facilities at Brookhaven.
Both facilities areinterested in compiling CPND. Part of these data are being compiledin EXFOR and will be exchanged with the other data centers.
Pearlstein tried to stimulate the CPND compilation, and hopes forother countries to join this effort. As a result of travels to othercountries such as India and China, Pearlstein found that people areunaware of what is actually being done. NNDC interest in medium
energy data compilation is going up to 1 GeV, and that of Berkeley isin energies higher than 1 GeV. NNDC hopes for co-operation in thiseffort. Siciliano mentioned that the efforts of LA and BNL seem tobe complementary. The bulk of the data in which the LA project isinterested are inelastic and elastic scattering data. So far there
is no co-ordination between LA and NNDC.

8.

Compilation and exchange of CPND
It was agreed that the co-ordination of CPND compilation in EXFOR
remains as before. This means that CAJaD is the main co-ordinator.
To avoid duplications, CPND compiling centers should inform CAJaD of
their compilation intentions in time before starting the compilation.
(Exempt are Chinese data compiled by CNDC and Japanese data compiled
by RIKEN.) During the past year this co-ordination suffered from thefact that the one or other letter did not arrive. Therefore, telexes
should be used.
The magnetic tape exchange is reorganized such that the CPND
compiling centers, i.e. CAJaD, RIKEN, NNDC, NDS and CNDC, send copiesof their tapes to each of the other centers. In addition, a tapecopy is sent to NEA-DB.

9.

Evaluated CPND in ENDF-6 format
Chukreev explained that CAJaD has so far no experience to put
evaluated CPND in ENDF-VI format; he hopes that CJD will help CAJaD
to get experience. Manokhin confirmed that nobody in the USSR atpresent has experience to put CPND into ENDF-6 format. Chukreev
mentioned that he has data for so-called exotic fusion reactions such

25

as p and t reactions on 7Li. Dunford proposed an informal exchange
between NNDC and CAJaD and suggested that Chukreev put his (a,n)
data in ENDF-6 format, and sends them to NNDC. NNDC would be
prepared to run the checking codes on the CAJaD entries and inform
CAJaD back of the findings. Chukreev welcomed this proposal, but
first would like to look into which data to compile, and secondly
whether they are perhaps already in a position to run ENDF-VI
checking codes themselves.
Thereafter he would be prepared torespond to Dunford*s proposal. An action was . put on Chukreev toinvestigate (i) what data he could compile and send in ENDF-VI
format, and (ii) which problems CAJaD had with implementing andrunning the checking codes for ENDF-6 formatted CPND.
An action was placed on NNDC to send to the other data centers theevaluated proton data for Fe with relevant documentation.
Zhuang Youxiang mentioned that as part of his fellowship work at NNDC
he has compiled 150 CPND entries into EXFOR. Over the next few years
CNDC would be interested in the compilation and evaluation of (a,n)
and (p,n) reactions, including all Chinese and non-Chinese data.
About 10 Chinese scientists would be part-time involved in thiseffort, making up about 4-5 MY/Y including experimental measurements:
two from the IAE Beijing, four from the Sichuan University, four fromthe Shanghai Institute of Nuclear Research, and two from the Applied
Physics and Computational Mathematics Institute in Beijing.
Anaction was put on Zhuang Youxiang, before compiling non-Chinese data,
to check with CAJaD as the coordinating center, to avoid duplicationof compilation.

10. Photonuclear data
Chukreev said that the Photonuclear Data Center of the Moscow State
University has plans to continue the compilation and evaluation ofexperimental photonuclear data; he had no information on the detailedplans. Manokhin and Chukreev took it to inform Varlamov and ask him
to inform the other data centers about their compilation andevaluation plans by the usual NRDC memo. Chukreev mentioned plans of
the Photonuclear Data Center to compile photodisintegration data of
6 7» Li into EXFOR. They have the same problem as CAJaD, in having
no experience in compilation in ENDF-VI format. An action was put on
all three USSR data centers to investigate the feasibility ofevaluation of CPND and PhND in ENDF-VI format and to report thefindings to the NRDC network. Informal steps will be taken regarding
the initiation of co-operation between the Moscow Photonuclear Data
Center and the new Livermore effort in PhND compilation.

11. Publications, CPND Bibliography
The CPND bibliography compiled by NNDC covers energy dependent crosssections and thick target yields up to 100 MeV incident energy. Thisis a by-product of the nuclear structure references (NSR) compilation
effort. Dunford emphasized that only integral CPND are compiled, notdifferential CPND such as for example secondary neutron spectra fromCP reactions. In terms of primary journals the CPND library is

26complete. The publication is not cumulative. So far there were four
editions over the past five years. If looking for a given reaction
one would have to scan all these four editions; however, a retrieval
from the computerized database ICPND is possible for all references
per reaction.
To satisfy NDS needs, NNDC will look into thepossibility to make 130 copies, which have been requested from NDS,
available to NDS.
Dunford mentioned that Ed Arthur from LA compiled a reference filefor medium energy nuclear data. For non-integral data one of the
major sources would be INIS; however this source is neither accurate
nor complete enough.

12. Stopping power
Chukreev mentioned that they have developed a special rule forincluding stopping power data in a separate column of data sectionsof CPND entries in EXFOR. He would be prepared to write the usual
memo to the other data centers about this problem, to give examples
and references and to ask the other data centers for comments.
Chukreev has a special problem in converting cross section data codedin mb/HeV into cross section data coded in rob. These are thicktarget transmission data which contain stopping power data as freeparameters. For this conversion they need a unique definition of the
stopping power data.
Lemmel wants to enter stopping power data as additional parameters to
explain the experimental CPND and also because of the use incalculation of cross sections.
According to the present rules,
stopping power data cannot be retrieved and are all entered as freetext information. An action was put on Chukreev to describe the rule
for including stopping power data as retrievable items in CPND EXFOR
and send a memorandum to the other data centers.
Cai Dun.iiu informed that they compile p, d, and o-stopping power
data, for Be, Al and Ni in free format in order to calculate theenergy loss of charged particles. This is so far only an internalreport and written in Chinese. They have also some photonuclear data
for D, Be, Na and Zr and some photofission data, again as internal
documents. An action was put on Cai Duniiu to send the reports to
Vienna, and another action on NDS to provide translations into
English.
A further action was put on Cai Dun.i iu. to comment on the problems incompiling stopping power data into EXFOR.

13. Coordination of compilation
radioisotope production

andevaluation

of

CPND

for medical

Hashizume reported on the major recommendations of the IAEA
Consultants' Meeting on Nuclear Data Requirements for Medical
Radioisotope Production, held at RIKEN, Tokyo, April 1987. The major
recommendations of this meeting and the conclusions of the present
meeting can be summarized as follows:

27

compilation and evaluation of 19 monitor reactions between
threshold and 200 MeV and publication in an own report (priority
I);-

compilation and evaluation of all production cross sections foreight most commonly used radioisotopes and publications ofreports for each radioisotope (priority I);
compilation of all EXFOR index lines and references for 23 lesscommon medical radioisotopes and their addition to the Okamoto/Gandarias Cruz report presented at the Tokyo meeting, andcompilation of the experimental production data for theseradioisotopes into EXFOR (priority II);
checking, and if needed, correction of decay data for 12 radionuclides; andorganisation of an intercomparison of nuclear model code
calculations for the 127I(p,xn) and 75As(p,xn) radioisopeproduction reactions.

Work on the implementation of these recommendations would essentiallyonly involve RIKEN, IAE-CP (CNDC), CAJaD and NDS. NNDC might help informat questions, as regards the compilation of evaluated CPND in
ENDF-VI format, NEADB could help in providing nuclear model codes forthe intercomparison exercise. It was decided to discuss the actions
following from the recommendations of the Tokyo meeting in a smaller
sub-group, consisting of Hashizume, Cai Dunjiu, Zhuang Youxiang,
Manokhin, Chukreev, Pearlstein (part-time), Lemmel (part-time) andSchmidt (chairman).
Monitor reactions (Priority I)
The Subgroup started with an information exchange on available dataand publications. Chukreev mentioned that data from threshold up to
200 MeV would be important, and mentioned in this context inparticular the ratio of proton reactions with 27 A1 leading to
2^Na and 22 Na residual nuclei respectively. He also mentioned a
German thesis by Michel from the FRG and, that Czechoslovakia has
evaluated data for Cu plus proton monitoring reactions. Hashizume
mentioned that he has already computerizedsome monitor reaction data which he intends to recompile in EXFOR
format.
Following a suggestion by Chukreev, it was concluded that RIKEN
should compile in EXFOR format and evaluate the available data for
the CP monitor reactions identified by Working Group I of the Tokyo
meeting (Memo CP-D/164, p. 3-4) and send the report to NDS before
October 1988 for publication. Chukreev agreed to send the available
CPND for Al, Cu and Zn to RIKEN as soon as possible after this NRDC
meeting. In the discussion it was emphasized that not a full-fledged
evaluation would be needed, but an educated eye-guide curve throughthe experimental data, supplemented in the case of lacking data by
nuclear model code calculations.

28

NDS was asked to start a new INDC-report series with distribution to
the medical radioisotope community and to publish the report onmonitor reactions as the first report in this new series before theend of 1988, on behalf of RIKEN and CAJaO. This report plus thereports for other radioisotope production data to be discussed below,
could form the basis of a comprehensive handbook on radioisotope
production data, which could be published at a later date and containmore comprehensive and more detailed evaluations. In the productionof this handbook, comments by the users on the first reports could
be taken into account.
Finally,an action was placed on NNDC to transmit
compilations in EXFOR to the other data centers.

recent

CPND

Eight most commonly used radioisotopes (Priority I)
The following agreement was reached. All CP production reactions forthe eight most common radioisotopes should be compiled in EXFOR
format and evaluated by the following data centers:
RIKEN + CAJaD
13 N

RIKEN

15 0

RIKEN

18 F

RIKEN + CAJaD (?)

67Ga

RIKEN

Ulln

RIKEN

123x

RIKEN and

201 T 1CAJaD

CAJaD (?)

For each of these radioisotopes a separate report should be compiled
and sent to NDS for publication, preferably before October 1988. An
action was placed on CAJaD. to inform RIKEN and the other data
centers whether it would co-operate with RIKEN on work for 1^0 and"p.
23 less commonly used radioisotopes (Priority II)
In order to implement these compilations, the following actions wereplaced on data centers as follows:
on NDS: to prepare a list of monitor reactions and all CP
reactions for the production of all medical radioisotopes
identified by the Tokyo meeting and send this list to the otherdata centers;on RIKEN, CAJaD. and NNDC: to transmit new CPND compiled
EXFOR format to the other data centers;

in

29

on IAE-CP (CNDC) and RIKEN; to inform CAJaD as the coordination
center for CPND compilation which of the 23 reactions quoted on
page 5 of memo CP-D/164, and which of the medical radioisotopes
listed on page 6 of the same memo they wish to compile; toinform also NDS and the other data centers;on HNDC: to send a complete index for all CPND contained in
EXFOR to the other data centers; and-on NDS: to update the report by Okamoto and Gandarias Cruz on
Nuclear
Data
for Radioisotopes
in accordance with therecommendations of the Tokyo meeting (CP-D/164, p. 6) and to
publish this updated report in the new INDC-report series for
medical radioisotopes.

Cai Dun.i iu indicated that the Chinese would be prepared to measuresome of these reactions.
Decay Data
Chukreev mentioned that these data are actually rather well known andshould only be checked and verified.
Code Intercomparison
Schmidt offered that NDS could organise the code intercomparison forthe^7I(p,xn)
and 7^As(p,xn) reactions in co-operation with
Marshall Blann.

14. Photonuclear data evaluation for ENDF/B-6
Warshaw enquired whether PhND exist in ENDF/B-6 format. Dunford
confirmed their existence. Warshaw noticed that in data reduction
one can divide the data sources into two groups, Bremsstrahlung-typesources
andelectro-nuclear
data
such
as
electron-proton,
electron-neutron interaction data, etc. which might have quite apractical importance in the future.

15. Nuclear model
services

codes.

availability.

documentation.

andcustomer

NordborR distributed a report, which contains a survey of most of thenuclear model codes available from NEADB. Schmidt raised the general
problem connected with the non-availability of nuclear model codes of
US origin to non-OECD countries. For several NDS projects, including
e.g. the ICTP Trieste Workshop in February/March 1988, theintercomparison of theoretically evaluated nuclear data e.g. for the
ITER-related evaluated nuclear data library, the code intercomparisonof medical radioisotope production cross sections and other projects,
a limited and well-defined package of US nuclear model codes would beneeded. In the discussions, Tubbs confirmed the non-availability of
US codes to non-OECD countries, without explicit permission by the US
originator and/or the National Energy Software Center at Argonne
National Laboratory. He thought, however, that nuclear model codes

30

would not be of such a sensitive nature as the reactor physics orother nuclear technology related codes and would thus probably bemore easily released. In view of the fact that the field of applied
nuclear theory and nuclear model codes was presently quite active,
with contributions from both OECD and non-OECD countries, it should
not present a very difficult problem to get a limited package ofcodes released.
In fact the code blocking was damaging to theprogress of the field. Tubbs underlined the good contacts of NEA toboth Joe Coyne, head of the TIC office at ORNL, and Margaret Butler,
head of the ANL National Energy Software Center.
NEADB would
volunteer to ask the Argonne Center for en-bloc release of nuclear
model codes, related to a well-defined benchmark exercise or otherwell-defined applications.
Pearlstein provided Schmidt with somebackground information on the DOE legislation related to the releaseof computer codes to non-US users. Tubbs informed, that NEADB has anaccount with the Argonne Center and pays up to 1 000 US$ for a big
code. From the discussions it appears to be best, if NDS approaches
first Margaret Butler for a release of a well-defined class of
nuclear model codes.

16. Customer services, handbooks planned
Lemmel started this item by mentioning the safeguards, radioisotope
production, and geophysics handbooks planned by NDS. Pearlsteinunderlined the usefulness of data "wish lists" as a basis for thescope of compilations. Schmidt agreed with this and mentioned thatsuch concrete "wish lists" had been established before starting thehandbooks mentioned by Lemmel. Chukreev informed about an index to
CPND and PhND data in EXFOR format which comprises 200 pages, iscurrently in press, and will be published in spring of 1988. CAJaD
will send 30 copies to NNDC, and 50 copies to NDS. Lemmel said thatNDS would need 130 copies. Chukreev will ask his authorities to get
permission to increase the number of copies to be sent to Vienna.
Pearlstein enquired whether Chukreev planned to make this a regularpublication; he mentioned data which had only recently been
published, not yet been transmitted to the other data centers andwill thus not appear in Chukreev1s handbook. Manokhin replied thatin principle they plan to have regular publications with supplements,
depending on the response to the first publication.
Lemmel mentioned that more recently NDS has started to distributesmaller nuclear data files on diskettes, and to transfer nuclear
model codes to PC. An action was placed on NDS to send copies ofthese codes converted to PC to the NEADB, in order to be incorporated
in the computer programme liberary of NEADB. Lemmel mentioned that
it would be tedious to send PC codes through the NEADB liaison
officers in non-OECD member states. Nordborg explained that NEADB
sends also codes directly to scientists in non-OECD member stateswith letter copy to the liaison officers. A similar action wasplaced on NNDC to send the ENSDF handling codes on PC to NEADB and
NDS.
Schmidt raised again the problem of the universal availability ofcodes to non-OECD countries. Pearlstein underlined the need for some
control of the distribution of codes, since particularly in the case31

of nuclear model codes, different versions were floating around. He
recommended again that NDS should first approach Margaret Butler fromthe Argonne National Energy Software Center. RSIC and NNDC had
exceptional permission to deal directly with the code customers who
would not have to go through the Argonne center.
Cai Dun.iiu
mentioned, that they have requested codes from the NEADB, and are in
return prepared to contribute an automatic optical potential
parameter adjustment code and a code for the calculation of yproduction data including pre-equilibrium decay to the NEADB.
Schmidt recommended strongly that also the HFTT code be included by
the Chinese in their contributions to the NEADB computer codecollection. At the recent Nuclear Theory Meeting in Beijing, thiscode was shown to achieve results in very good agreement withexperimental data. Cai Duniiu mentioned that another pre-equilibrium
code, written by Zhang Jin Shang (?) which takes the Pauli exclusion
principle into account and was successfully reported at the Nuclear
Theory Meeting in Beijing, will also be sent to NEADB. A publication
on fission product yield data has been prepared by Wang Dao on 10
fission product yield data sets which have been recently compiled andwhich will be issued in about one year's time.
Regardingradioisotope production data, Cai Dun.iiu mentioned that measurementsof nuclear data are going on at the Nuclear Research Institute at
Shanghai(decaydata),
Sichuan University(activationcross
sections), and at the Institute of Atomic Energy in Beijing(beam-spectroscopy measurements).
Manokhin mentioned a compilation of theoretically calculated fission
product yield data which has been carried out at the Institute ofPhysics and Engineering in Moscow. This library has been created on
the basis of thermo-dynamic considerations. The publication wasadvertised in Nuclear Constants No. 2, 1987; the data are available
on magnetic tape. An action was placed on CJD to inform the data
center network about the availability of these data. Hashizume
mentionedthat
90 reactions for the production of medical
radioisotopes have not yet been measured; he inquired whether the
Chinese could perform some of these measurements.
NordborR mentioned that NEADB offers on-line access to most of its
databases, there is no special publication planned. Tubbs noted that
NEADB will continue to publish reports on nuclear model code intercomparisons, the index of the computer programmes available in its
computer programme library, and the NNDEN newsletter.
McLane informed about the status of the new "barn-book". The bookincludes for the first time isomers with half-lives > 1 sec. The
low-energy cut-off is 0.01 eV, and the higher energy limit about 200
MeV. The book will contain about 900 pages and probably be publishedin January/February 1988. A lot of work has also been done on
activation cross sections for this edition of the "barn-book".
Lemmel enquired whether it would be possible to obtain the"eye-guide" curves appearing in the book on magnetic tape. Dunford
replied that this would not be possible for all curves but for
specific curves the release would be possible. He warned that thesumming-up of all partial cross sections to the total cross sections
is not guaranteed. An action was placed on NDS to define a request

32

for experimental data and eye-guide curves for activation reactions
as defined at the 16th INDC Meeting to be included in the CRP on
long-lived activation cross sections and isomeric cross section
ratios.
Dunford mentioned that five major databases are now on-line; CSIRS
would be the next on-line database. On-line excess is via MFENET,CYNET, TYNET and HEPNET. Lemmel enquired how the on-line service isbeing advertised by NNDC.
Dunford replied, as "NNDC on-line
systems". Lemmel suggested that all centers should have the samecollective names for their nuclear data systems, e.g. international
nuclear data base or similar.
Pearlstein will investigate the possible use of the neutron crosssection tools employed in the preparation of the new "barn-book" forfuture publications of CPND. Such publications are not yet decided.
The emphasis would be on high energy data between 20 HeV and 1 GeV.
NNDC will investigate over the next years the feasibility of such a
publication.
In any case such a CPND handbook would not be ascomplete as the "barn-book", but will only contain a selection of
CPND. The feasibility of the handbook depends mainly on manpower.
NNDC has the tools but no manpower for the production of thishandbook; it would need additional manpower for well-defined jobs,
such as the development of a computation format for CPND.

17. Future meetings
Lemmel and Schmidt introduced document INDC/P(87)-13 which lists the
future NDS meetings. Nordborg mentioned the NEANDC pre-equilibrium
meeting planned for February 1988 on the Semmering in Austria. Latespring 1989 or early fall 1989, a meeting on nuclear level densities
is planned in Bologna. If there is a (p,n) and (a,n) emission
spectra RCM planned in 1989, this should be held adjacent to thismeeting in Bologna.
Another meeting on activation cross sections for fission and fusion
reactors has been suggested by A.B. Smith for spring 1989; thismeeting should be small and confined to a maximum of 20
participants. Manokhin mentioned that the next USSR Conference on
Nuclear Spectroscopy and Nuclear Structure would probably take placein Baku in 1988. In 1989, a national neutron physics conference isplanned in Kiev. He also mentioned that in 1988 a fission meeting isplanned in Smolenice. An action was placed on CJD to report the dateof the Baku conference to Vienna. Another action was placed on NDS
to produce an update of the meeting list and send it to the data
center network.

18. Center-to-center on-line data transmission
On-line computer connections
between NNDC and NEA-DB.

betweenthecenters

work

routinely

NDS had made some on-line data transmissions as a trial only. For
details see the NDS status report given as Appendix 3. It was33

recommended that IAEA should link to EARN in Europe which corresponds
to BITNET in the US.
Lemmel noted that on-line transmission between Obninsk and NDS for
CINDA entries would be very desirable.
NNDC has five of its major data bases opened for on-line transmission
in the US, and it appears that this facility is frequently being usedby US users. As a next step, NNDC intends to open CSISRS dataon-line transmission to US users.

19. CINDA publication, new 'archival' issue
The publication of CINDA was reviewed. In areas 1 and 2 more andmore CINDA users have on-line access to the CINDA file so that theneed for the publication of CINDA in book form is decreasing. Sooner
or later the publication of CINDA will no longer be economic.
Therefore, a final cumulative issue will be desirable.
The situation is certainly different in areas 3 and 4, where on-line
access to the CINDA file is a quite rare exception, and where CINDA
books remain desirable.
However, pubication of CINDA in theconventional way for areas 3 and 4 only, is unlikely to be economic.
Annual supplement books, not cumulative, may be a solution.
The date for the final issue cannot be earlier than 1990.because athorough cleanup of the file {mainly area 4) still requires sometime. The financing of the final issue may be a problem. NDS will
provide cost estimates.
Payment in two installments should bepossible.

20. Important neutron data not covered in EXFOR
Due to manpower restrictions at the centers, there are several typesof important neutron data that are presently not compiled in EXFOR,
although requests for the compilation of such data have been
expressed on several occasions.
The situation was reviewed andsummarized as given in Conclusion 8.1. It can be seen that certain
data types are compiled by three of the four centers but not by the
fourth. In such cases the fourth center (i.e., NEA-DB in the case ofdata above 100 MeV, or NNDC in the case of kinetic energy of fission
fragments) should possibly aim at joining the other three centerswith the compilation effort.

21. Medium-energy nuclear data
Pearlstein introduced the document on the recent BNL meeting on thissubject.
He emphasized in particular his interest in benchmark
calculations.
Chukreev mentioned again the proton data up to 800 MeV by Dragovitschfrom DESY. He has the data on paper but not yet compiled in EXFOR.
Some other data will be transmitted with the EXFOR tape TRANS A019.

34

22. Co-ordination of fission product yield compilation and evaluation,
computation format (see Memo 4C-3/317)
McLane reported on the outcome of the recent Studsvik Meeting on
Fission Product Yields. The main recommendations from this meeting
were, thatfrom now on fission product yield data be compiled by the data
centers in EXFOR format,-

compiled fission product yield data be sent to evaluators forreview, and-a computation format common to all data centers be developed

The centers will have help e.g. by Wang Dao and Zhang Dongming indata compilation. Dickens from ORNL has promised to help NNDC byproviding a summer student. NNDC plans to convert the latest 1985
Meek-Rider file into EXFOR. Manokhin promised to investigate into
the possibility of fission product yield compilation and evaluationin area 4. McLane and Nordborg have already a fission product yieldcomputation format, which was in principle approved by Rider and Mike
James. An action was placed on NNDC to transmit by October 1987 to
all centers the proposed computation format for fission productyields, as agreed between NEADB and NNDC. NDS and CJD are asked toreport comments to NNDC by 1st March 1988. An action was placed on
all data centers to transmit fission product yield data in EXFOR
series 5-8 to the other data centers in official EXFOR format, assoon as manpower allows. The start of the CRP for fission productyield compilation and evaluation planned for 1989 fits well into thecurrent plans for the experimental fission product yield compilationby the data centers. Incidentally fission product yield compilations
are also needed and currently being performed by JEF and ENDF/B-VI.
In further discussion an action was placed on Schmidt to speed up the
publication of the proceedings of the structural material RCM in
Bologna and their distribution well in time before the February 1988
structural materials RCM. An action was placed on Goulo. to sendmore local information to the US meeting participants in theforthcoming FENDL Meeting in November 1987 in Vienna.

23. Co-ordination of neutron data evaluation
Dunford informed about the current status of ENDF/B-6. There is nota single funding source but a general pool of support for ENDF/B-6,
co-ordinated by the nuclear physics part of the USDOE.
As aconsequence, this library will be fully released, and Dunford does
not foresee any problem for its release. Since there is not enoughmanpower available in the US for its creation, formal and informal
co-operations have been established with scientists in various
countries to produce the input. He mentioned the co-operation with
the CNDC on evaluations for 0 and F. It is also intended to take theAm-241, Bk and Cf isotope evaluations from CNDL and, to submit themfor review by the CSEWG.
Several co-operations between JEF and
ENDF/B-6 evaluators are taking place. A new major updating of the35resonance data for U-235, Pu-239 and Pu-241 has been carried out in
co-operation between Cadarache (Derrien) and ORNL. Li-7 data were
evaluated in co-operation between Geel, Karlsruhe and Los Alamos. On
fission product nuclear data, a co-operation beween Gruppelaar andSchenter has taken place, however, with major concentration on
Gruppelaar.
NNDC discussed with Manokhin which of the Soviet
evaluations would be reviewed for incorporation into ENDF/B-6.
Dunford distributed a list of all evaluations contained in ENDF/B-6.
This list indicates that a number of ENDF/B-5 data were taken over inthe -6 version after scanning for their correctness. In addition,
the ENDF/B-V library has been fully translated into the ENDF-6 format.
The ENDF/B-6 standards are now available for review. A large effort
has gone into their evaluation, including the use of covariancetechniques, simultaneous evaluation techniques (R-matrix fitting
versus evaluation of experimental data) etc. He hopes for comments
by the users on the quality of these evaluations. The JEF standards
group gave a preliminary positive feed-back, and will continue toprovide feed-back. Short documentation will go with the file, alarger documentation is in preparation. Covariance matrices are not
yet available. An action was placed on all data centers except NNDC
to advertise the availability of the ENDF/B-6 standards file and to
invite comments to be sent to NNDC.
Nordborg reported on the current work on the JEF-2 library. The goal
is to have the fission product and minor actinide data ready by theend of 1988. Concerning structural materials and main actinides, the
Scientific Co-ordination Committee of JEF suggested to do a major
benchmarking; this may take the completion of these evaluations wellto the end of 1989. So far JEF data have been compiled in ENDF/B-V
format; eventually probably the ENDF-6 format will be adopted; NEADB
has not yet received any data in ENDF/B-6 format. Tubbs mentioned an
initiative coming from the NEANDC that its current chairman, A.B.
Smith, should write to Japan, JEF and the US to investigate thepossibilities for future co-operation in nuclear data evaluation.
Lemmel noted that NDS does not do evaluations itself, but assists
other centers and groups in evaluation work such as CNDC, Minsk, and
TU Dresden. Checking of the BROND and CENDL libraries is planned.
In area 2 NDS supports dosimetry cross section evaluations by Vonach,
and assists Mannhart in his Cf-252 prompt fission neutron spectrum
evaluation.
The "Mannhart evaluation" contains two files, one
point-wise evaluation and one histogram evaluation with covariancematrices. Schmidt explained briefly the strategy for the creation of
the Fusion Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (FENDL) related to theInternational Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) project.
This file will be coded in ENDF/B-6 format.
Manokhin started his presentation by strongly advocating the need for
co-operation in evaluations in order to save manpower and time. Even
to take over files from other evaluators was not easy and involves anumber of checks, group cross section calculations etc. CJD supports
the NDS activities in the Coordinated Research Programme (CRP) on
Methods of Calculation of Fast Neutron Cross Sections for Structural
Materials, but feels that it does not enough cover evaluation andexperimental aspects. Manokhin therefore suggested that the next

36

Research Coordination Meeting (RCM) under this CRP should be extendedin scope and in particular discuss the neutron capture and inelastic
scattering data contained in the Fe, Cr and Ni data files of the
BROND library and compare them with other evaluated data files.
Pearlstein noted that, what Hanokhin had said, confirmed theconsistent continuing interest of CJD mostly in documentation andcurves, not so much in other evaluated data files. Tubbs said that
he would raise the question of comparison with the BRONO files for
Cr, Fe and Ni at the November 87 JEF meeting. Schmidt suggested,that a first intercomparison of these files could take place at theforthcoming FENDL meeting in Vienna in November 87. Manokhin was
more interested to have this intercomparison take place at the RCM in
February 1988, because Ignatyuk will participate in the meeting, who
was heavily involved in the structural material evaluations. At the
FENDL meeting only the Kurchatov Institute will be represented. BothDunford and Manokhin expressed a common interest in independent peer
review of the other's data files. Manokhin mentioned, that the BROND
evaluations for Li and Cr have been completed, and that ENDF/B-6
plans to do the same evaluations; he asked whether the BROND
evaluations could not be taken from the beginning. Dunford said hewould be delighted, but unfortunately the documentation is only in
Russian and therefore difficult to understand. Also, there was quite
some experience in co-operation between US and West European
evaluators; the interaction with Soviet evaluators would, at least in
the beginning, be more difficult and would have to be exercised.
Manokhin mentioned that the Cr evaluation, while completed, is not
yet available in BROND, but will soon be ready; he asked Dunford
whether they would be interested in a review of these data. He
himself would be very interested in the resonance data of ORNL for
the Ni-isotopes. McLane prepared copies of the Fe, Cr and Ni pagesof the new "barn-book" and gave them both to Manokhin and Schmidt forthe planned intercomparison at the aforementioned meetings inNovember 87 and February 88.

24. Mito Conference, presentation on EXFOR
Since EXFOR is still not enough known by experimental nuclear
physicists, a presentation on the EXFOR system at the Mi to Conference
was recommended with McLane as main author and Nordborg/NEADB,
Manokhin/CJD and Lemmel/NDS as co-authors in order to give EXFOR a
wider publicity. Schmidt was asked, as member of the International
Advisory Committee of the Conference, to enquire with the Conference
organisers whether in view of the late date such a paper could stillbe accepted and presented as a plenary talk or at least as a poster.
He promised to try his best to get the paper still approved.

25. NRDC meetings in 1988 and 1989
The next technical meeting of the NRDC network was fixed for 4-6
October 1988 in Vienna. The 10th full NRDC meeting in 1989 could be
in Vienna or possibly in China. The latter possibility would depend
on whether the next NSDD meeting is already planned for China or
not. If not, then the 10th NRDC meeting could be held in China in37

1989. An action was placed on NDS to fix the meeting date and placeof the 1989 meeting in consultation with the network members.
Tentatively the date 10-13 October 1989 was fixed.

26. Miscellaneous. conclusions
The resulting actions were written up by N. Holden and reviewed by
the participants already during the meeting.
For the conclusions see page 39.
For the resulting actions see page 46.

27. CINDA
The discussions on the CINDA system and co-operation were baed on
Working Paper 2 which summarized the pending CINDA matters. The
results of the discussions are summarized in the Conclusions andActions under items 3 and A.

28. WRENDA
Schmidt informed that some West European contributions to the new
WRENDA 87/88 list were still lacking and that WRENDA 87/88 would be
published in the first half of 1988.
Manokhin advised that
accuracies quoted in requests by Usachev should be rounded off to thenext integer % figure (e.g. 2.1 % to 2 % etc.). Schmidt mentionedthat this time, as an exception, mainly because of staff change at
NEADB, NDS has taken on the coding of WRENDA input from area 2 andexpressed the hope that for the next edition NEADB would return tothe previous practice of coding area 2 input.

29. EXFOR (remaining items from 6)
The remaining discussions concentrated mainly on two topics.
The transliteration of Cyrillic characters in author names should bestandardized, as far as possible. Contrary to the Chinese who issued
an official regulation for Chinese transliteration, there is no such
regulation in the USSR. Chukreev explained that in the USSR two
transliterations are used: the "international" transliteration with
Ju and Ja is used in Yadernye Konstanty (Nuclear Constants), the"English" transliteration with Yu and Ya is used in the journal
Yadernaya Fizika. As CINDA and EXFOR are in English language, theEnglish transliteration should be preferred, unless an officialtransliteration scheme is issued by USSR authorities.
Where
feasible, a different author's transliteration could be given in
EXFOR in the "free text" following the machine-retrievable authornames.
The EXFOR coding of short-living isomers was reviewed. Chukreev
criticized that the flags in Diet. 27 indicate only those isomers
that existed already in the file. This requires bureaucratic work38

for updating the dictionary. These flags may be suitable for the
low-energy data, but in the medium energy region in which more andmore data are compiled now, there are many more isomers.
Consequently the use of isomer labels in Diet. 27 will be inadequate.
The codes
follows:-

CUM

and M+ within the REACTION coding are defined as

CUM includes radioactive decay from other nuclides, not fromisomers
M+:

g

<- M+

However, complication arises by the possibility of beta-decay which
is not forbidden.
CAJaD will write a new proposal. Other centers are invited to send
examples of difficult cases to CAJaD.
30. Exchange of EXFOR. experience with TRANS tapes
Lemmel presented Working Paper WP3 giving a summary of importanterrors found by NDS in EXFOR TRANS tapes. See Appendix 9. It was
found that several items to be checked seem to be missing in the
EXFOR check programs of the one or other centers. Efforts should bemade to improve these check programs and to compare the checkprograms by the different centers. The results of the discussions
can be found under item 5 of the Conclusions and Actions.

31. Evaluated data files
NNDC is going to release the ENDF/B-6 standards file, however still
without covariances.
The availability of the file should be
advertised to customers.
ENDF/B-6 will be fully released whenever it is ready.
The
documentation of the evaluations can be found in CINDA. A summary
documentation will be issued later. All materials are to be included
though some of them will be taken over from ENDF/B-5 with only small
improvements.
NEA-DB works on JEF-2 till the end of 1988. Benchmark testing willcontinue until end of 1989. The format is still ENDF-5, but ENDF-6
is likely to be adopted. There is no news about the release of JEF.
NDS has issued a Supplement tape to INDL, the new Cf-252 spectrum byMannhart, and has distributed the new evaluated Fission-Product Yield

39

Library from China. NDS works on a file for Fusion Data in theframework of ITER. NDS had issued a new Z-S-A index to evaluateddata libraries, IAEA-NDS-7O.
CJD has issued the BROND file. The tape was handed over during the
INDC Meeting in Beijing, but tape copies were not yet received fromthere. CJD will send another tape to NDS for distribtuion to theother centers.
Co-operation in NND evaluation was recommended. Forthcoming events
will be the fusion meeting in Vienna in November 1987 and thestructural materials meeting in Vienna in February 1988, for whichdata files together with documentation should be exchanged forgraphical intercomparison.
Meeting of evaluators at the IAEA at no cost to the Agency were
proposed.
NNDC offers their plotting facilities to support any
co-operation projects.
CNDC co-operation with Los Alamos in the evaluation of some actinides(Cf, Bk), which will be submitted for inclusion in ENDF/B-6.
CNDC proposed to define in ENDF-6 a new file for the total gamma-ray
production, for which cross-section (or total multiplicity), energy
spectrum and angular distribution would be given. Similarly, files
for the total production of charged particles and light nuclei should
be defined. This proposal should be considered by NNDC.

32. ENDF/B processing codes
Dunford informed that no updating of ENDF/B-6 processing codes isforeseen in the next 6-12 months. Lemmel mentioned Red Cullen's work
on ENDF/B pre-processing codes. The next step would be a check ofthese codes from experiences of users in area 3. Manokhin mentionedthat the GRUKON code is universally available, but unfortunately
documented only in Russian language. An action was placed on CJD tosend the GRUKON code with a short documentation to the NEADB.

41

Conclusions and actions

The conclusions and actions are summarized in the following sequence:
A. Conclusions
1.

Publications and meetings

2.

CINDA book3.

CINDA file4.

Joint CINDA/EXFOR matters

5.

EXFOR

6.

Charged-particle nuclear data

7.

Photonuclear data

8.

Neutron nuclear data

9.

Evaluated neutron nuclear data

10.

Computer codes and computer links

B. Actions
given under the same subject headings as the Conclusions above

43

A. Conclusions
1.

Publications

1.1

NDS plans handbooks on nuclear data for safeguards,
geophysics, and for medical radioisotope production.

1.2

CAJaD works on a handbook for fission-product beta-spectra, and on
an index to non-neutron EXFOR data. Of the latter 50 copies will
be made available to NDS.

1.3

CJD published a summary documentation on the BROND evaluations andconsiders to publish a handbook on threshold reactions. A database of fission-product yield data is being published in YK.

1.4

CNDC is issuing a handbook on fission-product yields.

1.5

NNDC has a new barn book in print as described in a separate
document.
It now includes also cross-sections leading tometastable states. The experimental data are fitted partly to
ENDF/B-5 data, partly to eyeguide curves. NNDC continues topublish the CPND bibliography.

1.6

NEA-DB continues to publish NNDEN.

1.7

The work for WRENDA88 is on the way. There are delays for thecontributions from UK, Belgium, FR Germany. NDS will finalize thefile and publish it in the usual way as INDC report.

2.

for

CINDA book2.1

As users get on-line access to the CINDA file, it is forseeable
that the publication of CINDA in the conventional way will nolonger be economic.

2.2

A final archival issue of CINDA should be published in 1990.

2.3

Thereafter, a less ambitious publication mode may be practicalsuch as annual supplement books which are not cumulative.

2.4

The financing of the final archival issue must be investigated.

2.5

The text about the importance of covariances could be included in
the CINDA book, as reacommended by the meeting on Covariancemethods and practices in the field of nuclear data, Rome, Italy,
17-19 November 1986. (See INDC(NDS)-192).

2.6

The production of the CINDA87 Supplement book is in progress. A
tape from CJD was dispatched on 28 October 1987 (RL-432) which was
too late for inclusion in the supplement.

2.7

Data tags do no longer exist in the CINDA file but are created at
NDS in the book production program to the first line of a block
which contains a data-index line with ref-type 3 or 4.

44

3.

CINDA file

3.1

CJD requests to receive any updates of the programs for the CINDA
file management.

3.2

The CINDA file acts as an EXFOR index. For this purpose, EXFOR
entries in process should be indexed in CINDA with hierarchy 6 andthe comment "In process", as proposed in 4C-1/191 solution 1.
When such index lines are changed from preliminary to final, thisshould be treated as a "cosmetic" change. Such preliminary index
lines would appear also in the book, and would be flagged by NDS
with the "Data tag" as usual.

3.3

For hydrogen, the quantity code DNG was so far forbidden in
CINDA. For Bremsstrahlun^ DNG with H should now be permitted, but
a warning message should appear in the check program. The comment"Bremsstrahlung production" should be given in the comment field.

3.4

NEA-DB is issuing a new CINDA Manual. to which comments arerequested as soon as possible. Update pages should be distributed
without delay whenever proposals have been agreed.

3.5

The work-type codes "e" and "d" are NEA-DB internal and should bemarked as such in the Manual p.II.8.1. The codes "X" and "B" areobsolete and should be removed from the Manual pages 1.1.3 andII.8.2.

3.6

Resonance integrals for (n.p) and (n.o) should be coded under NP
and NA with appropriate comment.
The CINDA Manual should be
updated accordingly.

3.7

Transmission of CINDA tapes should be continuous but at least fourtimes per year. Frequent CINDA transmissions are now even moreessential as more and more customers have on-line access to the
CINDA file.

3.8

NDS had encountered a number of mistakes in CINDA entries, mainly
by external CINDA co-workers of area 2, indicating that theseco-workers need improved supervision.
For details see Memo
4C-3/318.

4.

Joint CINDA/EXFOR matters

4.1

The transliteration of Cyrillic characters in author names should
be standardized in the English scheme (i.e., Yu and Ya, not Ju and
Ja).

4.2

The journal Fusion Technology is coded with the code FTC.
Memos CP-C/167 and CP-D/160).

4.3

The journal codes for Nuclear Instr. and Methods as proposed in
CP-D/163 is accepted.

4.4

For the conference 83MOSKVA more detailed information is requested
from CJD. (Cf CP-D/160).

(Cf

45

4.5

To the lab-code 4CCPMBP as proposed in CP-A/53 the place "Moscow"
is added in the Dictionary.

4. 6

The reference codes for the series "Foto.iadernye Dannye" asproposed in CP-D/164 are adopted.
CDFE is requested to print
report codes on the cover of this series.

4.7

Special characters permitted in EXFOR and CINDA are restricted to+ - , ( ) * / = * .

as originally agreed, and% > < : ; ! ? &as adopted in 1986.

Additional signs were not accepted.
In particular, square
brackets, Greek characters, or small numbers were found not
possible due to inconsistencies in different systems. Also lower
case characters remain forbidden in the exchange systems. The
signs that are forbidden in the exchange systems, can be createdfor output products, where feasible. However, the use of upper
case or lower case numbers is not recommended in output products
because they come out illegibly small so that, e.g., U 2 3 S andU 2 3 S can easily be confused.

5.

EXFOR

5.1

The treatment of isomeric data in EXFOR was designed for lowenergy data. Medium energy data being compiled now, have many
more short-living isomers for which the EXFOR formalisms create
difficulties.
CAJaD will submit a new proposal.
The other
centers are invited to send examples of difficult cases to CAJaD.

5.2

In contrast to the code M+, the code CUM includes radioactive
decay from other nuclides. '5.3

In inelastic scattering it is not distinguished whether
inelastic gammas come from an isomer or another excited state.

5.4

The column heading keyword FLAG remains forbidden in subentry
001. (Cf Memo 4C-3/313 and entry 22036). This should be added tocheck programs.

5.5

The quantity modifier MSC is added to the list of "General purpose
modifiers" to be used for extreme rare representations of data.
The nearest quantity code from Diet. 36 should be used to which
the MSC modifier is added. (Cf Memo CP-D/157).

5.6

The multiplicity factors in REACTION-subfield 3 (example; D,XN+YP)
are limited to 99, i.e., two digits. In the rare cases that they
are larger than 99, the formalism for the variable number of
product nucleons should be used. (Cf entry AO177 subentries 5, 9,
13, which should be retransmitted).

5.7

For "Spin-spin" cross-sections the formalism proposed in Memo
CP-C/168 is approved, pending a Lexfor entry to be proposed by
NNDC.

the

46

5.8

The Manual entries on MOM-SEC,
proposed in Memo CP-M/9.

EMS-SEC,

etc. areadoptedas

5.9

The dictionary additions as proposed in CP-M/8 are adopted withthe following exceptions:the code TABLE in Diet. 16 was considered as not necessary
and was therefore rejected,-

5.10

the PAR cross-sections proposed for Diet. 36 were notsufficiently understood, and more information on their
meaning was requested from CDFE.

In EXFOR check programs consistency checks should be introduced
where possible. For example:
ANG or its derivatives in DATA must always coincide with DA
or COR in REACTION.
Column headings for errors must be the same under ERR-ANALYS
and in the DATA table.
EN must not be given when REACTION SF2==0.
In Memos cases should be pointed out where check-programs shouldbe improved.

5.11

E-format numerical data must continue to be right-adjusted within
the DATA fields. This should be checked in the check programs.

5.12

Alter flags in col. 80 should be given correctly.
found incorrect or missing mainly in area 2 entries.)

5.13

It was stressed again that quantities Riven under MONITOR must be
proportional to the DATA. Otherwise use "ASSUMED" instead.

6.

(They were

Charaed-particle nuclear data

6.1

The co-ordination of CPND compilation activities remains unchanged.

6.2

The 5 CPND compiling centers (CAJaD, RIKEN, NNDC, NDS, CNDC)
should exchanae TRANS tape from each to each. In addition, a tapecopy should be sent to NEA-DB.

6.3

Evaluated CPND should be compiled in ENDF-6 format• NNDC will dothe checking for USSR ENDF-6 data as long as the FORTRAN-7 7
CHECKER codes cannot be implemented in the USSR.

6.4

CNDC intends to compile (p.n) and (a.n) data in EXFOR, in acooperative effort of twelve universities. This plan is highly
appreciated. If the compilation includes also data of non-Chineseorigin, the compilation must be co-ordinated with CAJaD in order
to avoid duplications in EXFOR.

47

6.5

NNDC will continue the publication of the Bibliography of integral
CPND covering the energy range up to 100 MeV. If possible, NDS
will receive 130 copies. Medium energy CPND are now being taggedin the NSR system but not included in above bibliography.

6.6

CAJaD suggested to include stopping power data in EXFOR andintends to write a memo on this topic. CNDC compiles such data
presently in free format. (So far p, d, a on Al, Be, Ni etc.)

6.7

It was agreed to compile CPND data for radioisotope production ina co-ordinated effort with the goal of producing a handbook. As
an interim step a special INDC report series will be created for
publishing one report per reaction, whenever work for a reaction
is finished. For details of this co-ordinated effort see the
Minutes for agenda item 13.

7.

Photonuclear data

7.1

Photonuclear data work in China covers (y,n) on D, Be, Zr, Na
and, recently, (y,f). Related reports should be sent to NDS.
See action 54.

7.2

S. Uarshaw reports on their activities to provide photonuclear
data for ENDF/B-6. including monoenergetic data and bremsstrahlung
data. Electronuclear data, which may be important for the future,
were not considered in the ENDF format.

7.3

A photonuclear
participants.

8.

Neutron nuclear data

8.1

data

file

on

PC-diskettewasdistributed

toCertain types of neutron data are not or insufficiently compiledin EXFOR. The following data types were identified.

area
data type
1. thermal scattering data
2. gamma spectra
3. spin assignment of fission
resonances
4. charged-particle induced
fission, e.g. (d,pf)
5. fission product yields
6. kinetic energy of fission
fragments
7. data above 100 MeV
8. polarization
9. reaction with polarized
neutrons

2

3

0
0
0

48

+•

the center compiles such data
the center does not compile such data
0such data did not occur in area 3(+) area 3: such data are compiled, but there is a serious
backlog(+) area 4: such data are presently not compiled, but they could
be compiled

8.2

A joint computation format for fission-product yields will beessential.
NDS will adopt the computation format developed
jointly by NNDC and NEA-DB. NDS should contact the other centers
as soon as possible.

8.3

The co-ordinated research program on FPY evaluation will start by
the end of 1988. Until then the EXFOR data base for FPY should be
uptodate.

8.4

NNDC has converted the Rider file to EXFOR format and will send
this to Drs. Wang Dao and Zhang Dongming at Birmingham. They will
review them and code additional entries in the preliminary EXFOR
series 5-8.

9.

Evaluated neutron nuclear data

9.1

The ENDF/B-6 Standards file, the JENDL-2 FP file and the BROND
file were announced to be released. Centers should advertise
their existence.

9.2

The use of the ENDF/B-6 standards should be promoted, supplementedby
the new Cf-252
fission-neutron
spectrum by Mannhart,
Braunschweig, that had been distributed by NDS.

9.3

Centers should encourage co-operation between evaluators.
In
addition to the forthcoming IAEA meetings, IAEA should consider
meetings of evaluators at no cost to the Agency.

9.4

Cullen's ENDF/B pre-processina codes will be updated, when needarises, by Cullen
at Livermore.
Relevant
proposals andnotification of defaults should be sent to Cullen with copy to
Dunford.

10. Computer Codes and Computer Links
10.1

Nuclear model codes are included in the scope of NEA-DB. An
updated inventory will be distributed to the other centers early
1988.
NEA cannot distribute US codes to non-OECD countries. To obtain
codes from the US an account of ca US$ 1000 is required. Contact
persons are Margaret Butler at the Argonne Code Center, andJ. Coyne at TIC Oak Ridge.

10.2

NDS is presently converting some nuclear model codes for use on a
PC.

49

10.3

NEA-DB will also deal with codes on PC diskettes but has presently
no such activities because the post of the IAEA representative at
NEA-DB is presently vacant. (It is to be filled by the IAEA INIS
Section).

10.4

When converting codes for use on a PC, centers should be awarethat many codes (e.g., GNASH) are in permanent update and thatvarious versions exist.

10.5

CJD offers the GRUKON code which should be sent to the IAEA man at
NEA-DB, together with documentation as soon as this is ready.

10.6

Possibilities of On-line connection of centers were discussed.
See also NDS progress report and the brochure by NEA-DB. So far
only NNDC and NEA-DB are connected, apart from a trial connection
between NDS and NEA-DB. It was recommended that the IAEA shouldlink to EARN in Europe which is linked to BITNET in the US, which
can be reached by NNDC. There are no such possibilities in the
USSR or China yet.

51

B. Actions
The actions are mostly as written up by N. Holden during the meeting, butwere sorted under subject headings. The original numbering of actions isgiven in brackets, e.g.
5.10
(26)

«• new numbering under subject headings<- number of the action in the list by N. Holden. If this is
missing, the action was added by H.D. Lemmel after the meeting.

1. Publications and meetings
1.1
1.2

NDS

In WRENDA, to change entries in entries by Usachev
accuracies such as 2.1% or 4.9% to 2% or 5%.

ALL

Prepare and circulate a list of scientific meetings intheir respective areas during 1988 and 1989.

NDS

Co-ordinate the lists of scientific meetings andcirculate revised copy to all centers.

(61)
1.3
(62)
2.

CINDA book

2.1

NNDC
(20) NEA-DB
CJD

Reminder: to contribute to CINDA text pages, in particular:a) to send coverage cutoff dates for literature listed under"selected" literature scanned for the present edition(new for CJD).
b) to explicitly state any codes to be added to or omitted
from this list.
c) to send information on conferences indexed since the lastedition.
d) to check other sections of the text pages and submit
revisions and additions, in particular the sections:
-

2.2

NDS

Provide a revised publication schedule for the "archival
issue" with revised cost estimates.

NDS

Decide whether to include covariance information in the
introduction, when preparing CINDA-88 book.

(63)
2.3
(79)

Neutron Data Handbooks
Acknowledgements
Annex, section 8 (numerical data libraries)

52

3.

CINDA file

3.1

ALL

To check target nuclei entered in CINDA against EXFOR Diet.
27, and to submit new nuclides for inclusion before
transmission of the corresponding entries to other centers.

CJD

To make sure that mail delays are minimized. Full-scale
CINDA co-operation cannot function without prompttransmission of correspondence and magnetic tapes. For
information of the receiving centers CJD should send telexesannouncing the dispatches.

ALL

To ensure that the coding of index lines to non-EXFOR datalibraries is complete and up-to-date until CINDA-88.

NDS

To continue work towards full responsibility of CJD for thearea 4 CINDA subfile.

CJD

To plan another visit of staff to Vienna for cleanup of thearea 4 subfile and work on action 21.

NDS

To continue to send to CJD:
- fast feedback on their CINDA entries- CINDA checking codes and updates- CINDA file (in agreed schedule)

NNDC

To send to CJD from now on also all area 4 entries in reader
format prepared by NDS, NNDC or NEA-DB, and update the area 4
subfile only with entries received from CJD.

(17)

3.2
(18)

3.3
(19)
3.4
(21)
3.5
(22)
3.6
(23)

3. 7
(24)

3.8

NEA-DB
NDS
ALL

Provide comments on new version of the CINDA manual to NEA-DB
by January 2, 1988.

NEA-DB

Update the CINDA manual using the conclusions of thismeeting.

ALL

Send CINDA transmissions at least four times per year.

(78)
3.9
(80)
3.10
(81)

4.

Joint CINDA/EXFOR matters

4.1

ALL

To contribute to the cleanup of Dictionary 3 (institutes)
and of the reference dictionaries 5, 6, 7 and to keep them
up-to-date. Specifically: New conference proceedings andany changes in institute names or journal names should bereported to NDS. Comments for improvements in the new"short expansions" for conference proceedings are welcome.

NDS

To write a Lexfor entry on the special treatment in EXFOR of
Chinese and other South-East Asian names.

ALL

To bring EXFOR index lines in CINDA up-to-date with highpriority, because CINDA is used in NNDC and elsewhere as an
EXFOR index.

(2)

4.2
(5)
4.3
(25)

53

4 .4

C JD

Send to NDS a copy of the proceedings of the 83MOSKVA
Conference.

NNDC

Provide CJD with a copy of the CINDA/EXFOR control list forinclusion of EXFOR line in CINDA blocks prior totransmission.

NDS

To send the EXFOR check program, whenever the new version isready, also to NEA-DB in addition to the establisheddistributions which includes CJD, CAJaD, RIKEN, IAE-CP, TUD.

ALL

With high priority to review memos containing requests forretransmissions of erroneous EXFOR entries and to correct
and retransmit them speedily; specifically to review thelist of requested retransmissions by 0. Schwerer (will besent out as a Memo).

ALL

To update their EXFOR checking programs to include the items
included in the list of disturbing errors found in TRANS
tapes (see Appendix . . . ) .

NNDC

To distribute for review the Manual updates resulting fromthe 1985 NRDC Meeting.

NNDC

To update the Manual according to the conclusions of thepresent meeting.

NDS

To update the Dictionaries according to the conclusions of
the present meeting.

ALL

to update their computer codes according to the conclusionsof the present meeting.

NEA-DBNDS
CJD

To review the EXFOR files 6, 7, 8 recently compiled by NNDC
for missing data from areas 2, 3, 4, as soon as this has beentransmitted. However, the compilation of new data shouldhave higher priority than the conversion of the EXFOR 6, 7,
8 files into the regular 2, 3, 4 files.

NNDC

Send EXFOR files 6, 7, 8 to other centers for adding details
and updating.

ALL

Supply NNDC with any electronic or other mail addresses for
the LEXFOR manual.

NNDC

Investigate whether Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
intends to become a participating center.

NNDC

Change address for M. Berger to Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899.

(36)
4.5
(77)

5.

EXFOR

5.1
(1)

5.2
(3)

5.3
(4)

5.4
(6)
5.5
(7)
5.6
(8)
5.7
(9)
5.8
(11)

5.9
(12)
5.10
(26)
5.11
(28)
5.12
(29)

54

5.13

NNDC

Remove Dearnaley and Marcinkowski from list of participating
centers.

NNDC

Correct Prof. Seeliger's name.

NNDC

Change name of head of CDFE to Vladimir Varlamov.

NNDC

Propose the LEXFOR entry for the approved spin-spin crosssection.

CAJaD

Inquire whether CDFE really needs partial cross section entry
in EXFOR. If item is required, more information isnecessary.

ALL

Hake concentrated effort to correct and retransmit those
EXFOR entires for which retransmission had been requested.

ALL

Whenever possible, update checking codes.

ALL

If an error occurs on retransmission, which should have beencaught by the checking program, inform the transmitting
center.

NDS

Benchmark the checking programs using PL1 and Fortrancompilers and report on the intercomparisons.

NDS

Remove A flags for short-lived isomers from dictionary 27.

ALL

Update check programs according to action 85.

(30)
5.14
(31)
5.15
(32)
5.16
(35)
5.17
(38)

5.18
(39)
5.19
(40)
5.20
(41)

5.21
(42)
5.22
(85)
5.23
(86)
5.24
(87)

5.25

NNDC
To send to CAJaD prior to January 31, 1988 examples ofanddifficult coding cases dealing with short-lived isomers.
otherinterested
centers
CAJaD

To draft memo with a proposal for coding od short-lived
isomers.

5.26

CAJaD

To submit a memo containing the physics of data involving
short-lived isomers, and to propose an improved coding
scheme for such data.

5.27

NEA-DBTo improve the EXFOR check program with respect to- consistency between REACTION (DA,COR) and column headings(ANG), and between ERR-ANALYS and error column headings- right adjusted E-format data
- alter flags
and others.

(88)

55

6. CharRed-particle nuclear data
6.1

NNDC

To retransmit that entry from TRANS-C004 where Na-22 and C-12
were inverted.

NDS

Investigate whether the Study Group in Japan wishes tocontinue as an active cooperating center.

CAJaO

Send to other centers proton beam monitor reaction data on
copper and carbon.

CAJaO

Inform V.V. Ezhela about the efforts of Siciliano of LASL on
medium energy CPND compilation.

ALL

In the inerests of coordination and to avoid overlap in CPND
compilation, notify CAJaD by telex of any data sets being
compiled.

CAJaD

Investigate the possibility of compiling their evaluated CPND
in ENDF-6 format.

CAJaD
(46)

Investigate the potential problems in getting checking codesfor data written in ENDF-6 format operational on their
computer.

6.8

NNDC
(47)
.

Send to all centers an example of CPND coded in ENDF-6
format (proton reactions on iron) along with documentation.

6.9

CNDC

Check with CAJaD about their (p,n) and (a,n) data sets toavoid overlap in the CPND compilation effort.

NNDC

Increase the distribution to NDS of the next ICPND
bibliography (April 1988) to 130 copies.

CAJaD

Prepare a memo on their proposal to code stopping power
information within CPND entries.

CNDC

Provide comments on any potential problems in the compilationof stopping power data in EXFOR format.

CNDC

Provide NDS with a copy of their internal report on thephotonuclear and photofission data that they have compiled.

CNDC

Consider the possibility of converting their photonuclear andphotofission data into the EXFOR format.

CAJaD

Send available CPND for Al, Cu and Zn to RIKEN as soon as
possible after this NRDC meeting.

RIKEN

Compile in EXFOR format and evaluate, in cooperation with
CAJaD (see preceding Action), available data for CP monitor
reactions identified by Working Group I of IAEA Consultants'
Meeting on Data Requirements for Medical Radioisotope
Production, Tokyo, April 1987 (Memo CP-D/164, p.3-4), andsend report to NDS before October 1988 for publication (seefollowing Action).

(13)
6.2
(27)
6.3
(33)
6.4
(43)
6.5
(44)
6.6
(45)
6.7

(48)
6.10
(51)
6.11
(52)
6.12
(53)
6.13
(54)
6.14
(55)
6.15
(64)
6.16
(65)

56

6.17

NDS

Start new INDC-report series and distribution for medical
radioisotope production data and publish joint RIKEN-CAJaD
report on monitor reactions as first report in the newseries before the end of 1988, on behalf of RIKEN and CAJaD.

RIKEN
CAJaD
NNDC

Transmit new CPND compiled in EXFOR format to other data
centers.

RIKEN
CAJaD

Compile in EXFOR format and evaluate excitation functions for
all CP production reactions for the following of the mostcommon radioisotopes:

(66)

6.18
(67)

6.19
(68)

CAJaD), 1 3 N(RIKEN), 15 O(RIKEN) + CAJaD(?)),
F(RIKEN + CAJaD(?)), 67 Ga(RIKEN), 1 1 1 In(RIKEN),
123
I(RIKEN), and 2 0 1 Tl(CAJaD), compile report for eachradioisotope and send to NDS for publication, preferably
before October 1988.
18

6.20

CAJaD

Inform RIKEN and the other data centers whether it will
co-operate with RIKEN on work for 1 5 0 and 1 8 F .

NDSPublish separate reports, for each radioisotope, resulting
from the preceding two Actions in the new INDC report series
for radioisotope production.

NDS

Prepare list of monitor reactions and all CP reactions for
medical radioisotope production identified by Tokyo Meetingon Radioisotope Production Data and send to other data
centers.

NNDC

Send to CAJaD, IAE-CP (CNDC), NDS and RIKEN monthly excerpts
from NSR file for all CP reactions listed by NDS (seepreceding Action).

IAE-CP(CNDC)RIKEN

Inform CAJaD as coordination center for CPND compilation
which of the 23 reactions quoted on page 5 of Memo CP-D/164,
and medical radioisotopes listed on page 6 of same memo theywish to compile. Inform also NDS and other data centers.

NNDC

Send complete index for all CPND contained in EXFOR to theother data centers.

NDS

Update the report by Okamoto and Gandarias-Cruz on nuclear
data for medical radioisotopes in accordance with therecommendations of the Tokyo Meeting (CP-D/164, p.6) andpublish in the new INDC report series for medical
radioisotopes.

NDS

Organize intercomparison of nuclear model calculations forthe reactions 1 2 7 I(p,xn) and 7^As(p,xn) and inform theother data centers about the results.

(69)
6.21
(70)

6.22
(71)

6.23
(72)

6.24
(73)

6.25
(74)
6.26
(75)

6.27
(76)

57

6.28

NNDC

To send out the new EXFOR compilation of medium-energy CPND.

6.29

ALL

Check Dunford's survey of CPND compilations and communicate
to him any omissions.

CAJaD

To retransmit entry AO177 avoiding three-digit multiplicity
factors in REACTION subfield 3, by using the formalism ofvariable number of product nucleuos.

6.30
(1)

7.

Photonuclear data

7.1

CAJaD

Contact CDFE and suggest that a report code be added to theirphotonuclear publication series.

(49)

CAJaD
CJD

Inform CDFE and investigate the possibility of theirevaluation of CPND and photonuclear data in ENDF-6 format
and report CDFE plans to the network.

(50)

CAJaD
CJD

Query CDFE about the status of the photonuclear data tapes
described in their progress report. Have these tapes been
prepared and sent? Telex reply to network.

(37)
7.2

7.3

8.

Neutron nuclear data

8.1

NDS

To contact Dr. Cai Dunjiu and clarify the EXFOR coding offission-products as mentioned in his letter of 86/9/23.

NEA-DB

Retransmit entry 22036 (Trans 2117) with correrted FLAGS.

CJDWill inform network on the availability of the fission
product yield calculated data from thermodynamic principles
on magnetic tapes from the Moscow Institute of Physics andEngineering.

NNDC

Send the proposed computation format description of thefission product yields to all centers prior to December 1,
1987.

ALL

Report back to NNDC any problems with the product yields
computation format by March 1, 1988.

ALL

On a time available basis, convert the 5000, 6000, 7000, and8000 entries of fission product yields into legal EXFOR
format and retransmit as soon as possible.

8.7

ALL

To contribute implementing the covariance recommendations
from the Rome Meeting [see report INDC(NDS)-192].

8.8

Neutron To compile in EXFOR fission product yield data for review
Centers and evaluation by the specialized centers in US, UK, China.

(10)

8.2
(34)

8.3
(58)

8.4
(82)

8.5
(83)

8.6
(84)

58

9.

Evaluated neutron nuclear data

9.1

NDS

To distribute, at regular intervals, tape copies of IAEA-NDS70, the Z-S-A index to evaluated data libraries.

NEA-DBTo distribute the new JENDL-2 FP library.

NEA-DBIf existing, to provide (or quote the reference of) the
documentation for JENDL-2 evaluations, including thelibrary.

(14)

9.2
(15)

9.3
(16)

9.4

FP

ALL

Inform customers about the availability of the ENDF/B-6
standards file and request that any comments on the file betransmitted back to NNDC.

NNDC

On a selected basis, use the computer programs developed forthe new BNL book of curves to assist specialists' meetingsby plotting overlays of evaluated and experimental nuclear
data.

9.6

NDS

To update the area 3 distribution list for NNDEN and toinclude Wang Gongqing, Nuclear Data Group, Shanghai Inst. of
Nucl. Res., Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 8204, Shanghai, China.

9.7

NDS

After receipt of the BROND tape, send copies to the othercenters.

9.8

NNDC

To examine the CNDC proposal to create in the ENDF-6 format
new files for- total gamma-ray production- total production of light nuclei
for which cross-sections (or multiplicity), energy spectrum
and angular distribtuion would be given.

(59)

9.5
(60)

10. Computer codes
10.1

NDS

Send copies of the nuclear model codes on personnel computer
diskettes to NEA-DB.

NNDC

Send copies of P.C. diskettes of nuclear structure codes to
NEA-DB and NDS.

CAJaD

To send to NEA-DB a tape copy of the GRUKON code with
documentation.

NEA-DBTo distribute the updated version of the Computer Program
Abstracts on nuclear model and related computer codes.

(56)
10.2
(57)
10.3
(89)
10.4

59

Appendix 1
NNDC

National Nuclear Data Center
Status Reportto theNinth Nuclear Reaction Data Centers Meeting
October 27 - 29, 1987

I.

GeneralSince the last meeting of the Nuclear Reaction Data Centers in October
1985, our staff has remained the same (13 scientific/professional and9 *t s u p p o r t p o s i t i o n s ) .
In a d d i t i o n , we h a v e a v i s i t i n g s c i e n t i s tfrom the People's Republic of China doing NSR reference coding andexperimental high energy proton-induced reaction data compilation.

II.

Computer Facilities
The VAX 11/780 has hardware additions in the following areas:
1. Three RA81 disk units 456 MB each
2. DMR-il communications link to the BNL Central Scientific Computing
F a c i l i t y w h i c h has a c c e s s to n e t w o r k s .
The l i n k speed is 56
kilobaud.
3. Three LN03 plus laser printers
4. One DEC server—100, 8 asynchronous ports.
5. One DEC server-200, 8 asynchronous ports.
6. Ethernet local access network.
7. IBM PC/FIT with software and hardware to link to Ethernet.
8. Line printer 1200 LPM.
9. Several modems for remote telephone access.
10. 12 megabytes of memory
A diagram of the system as of September, 1887, is attached.
We anticipate replacing the DEC system-10 computer in the first quarterof 1988 with a Vax processor 8,000 series with a CPU rating of from 6 to
12 million instructions per second (MIPS).

60

II.

Bibliographies
The normal CINDA and NRS activity has continued.
Pour supplements
and two c u m u l a t i v e issues of Recent References have been publishedsince October, 1985. Two e d i t i o n s of Charged Particle
NuclearData
Bibliography
were p u b l i s h e d c o v e r i n g t h e l i t e r a t u r e f r o m April 1,
1985 through April 10, 1987.
CINDA indices
Reports.

were prepared

for the 1986 and 1987 DOE-NDC Progress

III. Data Libraries
In the period from October 1985 through September 1987, 29 neutron datat r a n s m i s s i o n t a p e s (TRANS 1199-1227) were s e n t c o n t a i n i n g new andcorrected entries.
In conjunctions withfiles were undertaken.

the Book of Curves, major corrections to the data

The compilation of charged-particle data for incident protons was begun.
A transmission tape will be sent shortly.
The NNDC chairs the Medium-Energy Nuclear Data Working Group (MENDWG)
which held i t s first meeting May 21-22, 1986. Seventeen organizations
f r o m the U.S., Canada, t h e Federal Republic of Germany, and t h e U.K.
provided input.
IV. Evaluated Nuclear Reaction Data
ENDF/B-VI is now scheduled for c o m p l e t i o n in t h e f i r s t half of 1989.
The e n t i r e ENDF/B-V l i b r a r y has been c o n v e r t e d to GNDP-6 f o r m a t .
The ENDF u t i l i t y codea h a v e been c o n v e r t e d to ANSI-77 FORTRAN andupgraded to handle all but the generalized R-matrix and new covarianceformats. The checking codes have been extensively tested on theconverted ENDF/B-V library and on JEF.
The evaluation of standards for ENDF/B-6
is available at the NNDC.

has been completed andHigh energy Neutron and proton libraries forIn the ENDF-6 formats.

9S

Pe have been prepared

V. Nuclear Strucure Data
NNDC continues to publish the Nuclear Data Sheets. As of September, 1987,
issues through Volume 52, issue#3 have been sent to Academic Press.
Publication Is on sohedule.

Appendix 1
NNDC

VI. Customer Services
During the past two years, the NNDC has instituted on—line services forthe following types of data bases:
Nuclear Structure References (NSR)
CINDA
ENDF/B-V
ENSDF
NUDAT - a collection of evaluated nuclear data , including nuclear levels
and their properties, nuclear masses, nuclear ground and znetastablestate properties, and radioactive decay radiations.
Since October 1, 1985, 5141 retrievals have been made by on-line customers.
Approximately 50% of the retrievals have been from the NRS data base.
There are 45 active customer accounts; many of these serving more than oneuser.
The r e q u e s t
attached.

statistics

for J u l y

1, 1985 t h r o u g h

June30, 1986 are

VII. Publications
The fourth
is in press.

editionof Neutron

Cross

Sections,

Vol. 2, Book of Curves,

A new edition of the Nuclear Wallet Cards Is planned for January 1989.
J. K. Tuli contributed the section on Nuclear
Handbook on Nuclear Activation Data, 1987.

Properties

to the IAEA

The latest DOE-NDC Compilation of Requests for Nuclear Data was publishedin January 1987
The Fast Neutron Newsletter, Issue #7 is in preperation.

National Nuclear Data Center
Computer System
DECIapeControl

1.25 Mw Internal Memory

POP-U/34
Communications
Front-end

1 1 1 1
DTAO

DTAt

DTA2

0TA3

DECsystem-10
KI-I09IE

I/O BusCentralPOP-H/40
ConsoleFront-end

1

Processor

Versatec
11"
Console8 I n t e r n a l Channels

40 Asynchronous
Terminal Lines
Card
ReaderRemoteInteractive
Graphics

Diagnosis

RPAQ

RPBO

RPCO

Line
Printer

MagtapeControlComputer Link
RPAt

LN03+

RPCI
MTAO 7 track ( 2 0 0 / 5 5 6 / 8 0 0 bpl) 2 0 0 Ips

16 MB Memory

Laser

7 Removable Pack
Disk Drives
176 MB each

MODEM

RPC2
MTA1 9 track (800/1600 bpl) 200 Ips

VAX It/780
MODEM
Cl

111

r t i l l

UnibusI

Massbus16 Async
Ports
{

Line

Printer

DMR-llj | Console }56 KB Link to
Networks

ETHERNET LAN
J_
OCCserver -100)

ITITIMI
8 Async Ports

MTA2 9 track (1600/6250 bpi) 125 ips

Star Coupler

1— MTA3 9 track (1600/6250 bpi) 200 Ips
HSC50 I Storage Controller

TU78
9 Ik Magtape(1600/6250 bpl)
125 Ips

1

1

1

1

SAO

SA1

SA2

SA3

IBM PC/AT

4 Fixed Medta RA81 Disk Drives 456 MB each
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Upton, N.Y. 11973
October, 1987

ETHERNET LAN|PECserver-2Oo|r

I IIIIIII
8 Async Ports

LHO3+

LN03 +

2 Laser
Printers

O
to

63

Request Statistics
TABLE II
1 July 1985 to 1 July 1987
Area 1REGULAR DISTRIBUTION OF DATA AND INFORMATIONA.

Experimental Neutron Data: 31 Tapes (TRANS 1196 to 1226)

B.

Experimental Charged Particle Data: 1 Tape (C005)

C.

Experimental Photonuclear Data: 1 Tape (L002, Update To L001)

D.

Evaluated Neutron Information: 6 Tapes
ENDF Utility Programs (ENDF/B-VI Version 6.0, Version 6.1,
Version 6.2)
ENDF/B-V Data (Tape 520; Photon Interation Data, Tape
567,568: General Purpose Data-Hods, for Version 1 and 2)

E.

Bibliographic Neutron Information: 27 Tapes CINDA COVERAGE(C068 TO C094)

Appendix 1
NNDC

64

Request Statistics
TABLE I
1 July 1985 to July 1987
Area 1NUMBER OF REQUESTS FOR NEUTRON AND CHARGE PARTICLE INFORMATION*

Requestor

Experimental Evaluated Bibliographic Programs Documents Total
Data
Data
Information

USA-Goverment
Agencies

86

73

5

22

147

333

USA-Education
Institutions

31

22

2

12

89

156

USA-Industry

24

26

0

8

156

214

Canada

0

4

0

3

13

20

Foreign (except
Canada)

-

-

-

21

194

215

TOTAL

141

125

66

599

938

*This table does not include regular distributions, see Table II.

Appendix 1
NNDC

65
Request Statistics
TABLE I I I
1 January 1985 t o 51 December 1985
Area 1
EXPERIMENTAL NEUTRON DATAFXEMENT

ELAS.
SCAT.
(EL)

TOTAL
(TOT)

j

O-HN

1

!

1-H

6

! 2-He3! 3-Li

OTHER
SCAT.
C/S

IHEL.
SCAT.
(INL)

0

0

1

7

3

j 4-Be

0

5

0

0

2

0

0

4

1

p

0

1

18

1

2

0

0

0

8

0

0

14

1

1

0

0

0

0

2

0

1

5

! 5-B

3

5

5

3

0

0

1

0

8

25

i 6-C

7

8

4

6

37

12

43

0

1

11a

! 7-N

2

1

0

0

0

0

4

0

0

7

2

0

1

1C

•

O

j

O

J

O

TOTAL
REQUESTS

0ij

OTHERSOi•GAMMA & CHARGED
NEUTRONPARTICLE
EMISSION EMISSION FISSION(NG)(NX) (NF)

0 j

t

2 j

SES.
PAR.
(RES)

J

j
,

21

1

!

--0

2

3

2

0

0

0
•

! 9-F

1

0

1

0

2

3

13

0

0

20

! 10-Ne

0

0

0

0

0

'

3

0

0

4

] 11-Na

1

0

0

0

0

4

6

0

1

12

1

1

0

0

1

17

0

1

22

i

i 12-Mg
j 13-A1

4

3

1

0

0

1

16

0

3

28

!

U-Si

4

6

1

0

0

0

6

0

0

17

! 15-P

1

0

0

0

0

1

6

0

o

8

! 16-s

1

2

1

0

0

0 i

4

0

o !

8

! 17-Cl

. 1

0

0 i

0

0

0

0 i

10

i

!

1

i

66

TOTAL
(TOT)

ELEMENT

OTHER
INEL.
SCAT.
SCAT.
C/S
(INL)

ELAS.
SCAT.
(EL)

Appendix 1
NNDC

GAMMA & CHARGED
RES. NEUTRONPARTICLE
PAR. EMISSION EMISSION(RES) (NG)(NX)

FISSION(NF)

TOTAL
OTHERS REQUESTS

!

o1

o !

o !

o !

1

j

4 1

o !

o !

6

j 19-K

1 !

0

o !

0

0 j

2 j

2 j

o j

o 1

c

! 20-Ca

1

2

o !

o !

o !

3 !

7 ]

o j

1

]

14

! 21-Sc

i

!

2

1 i

i

8 i

5i

11

!

oi

1

!

3C

| 22-Ti

1

:

1

o |

o !

o1

1

5 j

o ]

1 i

o

i 23-V

3

0

0

0

0

1

7

o !

0

11

! 24-Cr

2

0

0

0

0

1

7

o !

0

10

! 25-Mn

1

1

1

1

10

6

18

0 '

3

41

! 26-Fe

4

20

15

6

31

23

49

0

5

153

! 27-Co

2

4

0

1

4

7

0

1

4

4

0

0

4

7

0

0

24

9

0

1

16

9

0

0

12

0

0

4

! 18-Ar\1

j 28-Ni

!

I

•'

18

! 29-Cu

2

1

0

0

0

! 3O-Zn

2

0

0

0

0

1

! 31-Ga

1

0

0

0

0

1

! 32-Ge

0

0

0

0

0

1

2

0

0

3

! 33-As

0

0

0

0

0

0

5 !

o

0

5

j 34-Se

0

0

0

0

0

2

6 !

o

0

8

| 35-Br

1

o i

0 !

o !

o

0

0

!

o

0

!

i

! 36-Kr

0

0 i

0

o

o

7

0

o

1

!

8

j 37-Rb

0

0

j

0

0

I

°

0

0

j

0

5 !

20

13

°
o

0

3

I
3 I

2 !

57

i

1

i

! 38-Sri

65

I 39-Y

i

2 |

1

!

1 !

o !

o !

3 I

2

!

o !

o !

9

! 4O-Zr

!

7 i

2

!

1 !

o !

o i

11

I

16

i

o !

1

38

! 41-Nb

!

2 !

2

i

3 !

o i

0

!

1

!

7

!

0 !

o !

15

! 42-Mo

i

7 !

5 i

0 j

i i

0 !

n

5 i

0 !

1 !

30

! 43-Tc

!

o !

o !

o j

0 j

0 !

o !

o !

o '

o !

o

67

TOTAL
(TOT)

ELEMENT

OTHER
SCAT.
C/S

INEL.
SCAT.

ELAS.
SCAT.
(EL)

(ML)

Appendix 1
NNDC

RES.
PAR.

GAMMA &NEUTRON
EMISSIONCHARGEDPARTICLE
EMISSIONFISSION

(RES)

(NO)

(NX)

(HF)

TOTAL

OTHERSREQUEST?

o !

0 I

o i

o !

o !

o !

o !

o !

o !

0

i 45-Rh

1

0

0 j

0

0

2

0

oj

o !

>

! 46-PD

3 I

o !

o I

0

o !

3 !

3 !

o !

o !

! 44-Ru|I

j 47-Ag

2

0

0

0

0

2

5

o j

0

! 48-Cd

2

1

0 !

0

0

0

9

o !

i

1?

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

j -9-In! 5O-Sn

7

3

1

0

0

9

1

0

1

22

! 51-Sb

1

0

0

0

0

1

4

0

0

S

j 52-Te

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 53-1

1

0

0

0

0

1

11

0

0

13

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

2

1

4

11

6

17

0

0

46

j 56 -Ba

2

0

0

1

0

7

3

0

0

13

! 57-La

1

0

0

0

0

1

5

0

0

. 7

j 58-Ce

3

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

i

4

!

-j^-Pr

1

0

0

0

0

1

3

0

0

!

5

j 6O-Hd

15

9

7

12

60

26

20

0

2

! 61-Pm

0

0

0

0

i

o

0

0

0

0

! 62-Sm

12

7

5

3 !

43

24

.13

0

5 I

112

! 63-Eu

10

10

3

3 !

54 !

23 !

!

o

12

!

117

! 64-Gd

0

0

0

0

!

o |

1

o !

o

0

j

1

! 65-Tb

0

0

0

0

!

o

0

2

0

0

!

2

! 66-Dy

0

0

0

0

!

o

1

2

0

0

3

2

1 !

1

3 !

6

8 i

0

i !

26

7 !

7

2

H

!

38 !

13 !

i

95

0 !

o !

o

0

!

o !

3

o !

4

i

i
•>

0

1

! 54-Xe! 55-Cs•! 67-Hoi! 68-Er

!

! 69-Tm

i

•

! '

j

4

!

!

!

2

12

i

1 i

!

o !
0

!

2

151
!

•

o

68
ELAS.
SCAT.
(EL)

TOTAL
(TOT)

ELEMENT

OTHER
SCAT.
C/S

INEL.
SCAT.
(INL)

Appendix 1
NNDC

GAMMA & CHARGED
NEUTRONPARTICLE
EMISSION EMISSION
(NG)
(NX)

RES.
PAR.
(RES)

FISSION(NF)

OTHERS

1 70-Yb

i

1 '

0

0'

0 i

o !

2 !

2 !

0 i

o !

! 71-Lu

!

3 !

3 i

1

3 !

15 !

9

8 !

0 i

3 I

TOTAL
REQUEST

4

I! 72-Hf

|

0

o !

0

o !

0

0

o !

oi

o !

j 73-Ta

'

2

0

0

0

0

2

5

0

0

! 74-W

1

0

0

0 !

0

1

6 !

o !

0 !

j 75-Re

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

! 76-Os

0

0

0

0

2

1

0

0

0

! 77-Ir

0

0

0

0

0

•4

0

0

0

! 78-Pt

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 79-Au

1

0

0

0

0

10

6

0

0

! 80-Hg

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

i 81-Tl

0

0

0

0

0

4

2

0

0

0

0

2

4

0

1

21

4 ;

3

0

1

10

i

•

',

c
.

i

f

! 82-Pb

5

5

4

i 83-Bi

1

1

0

i •

o

0

! 88-Ra

0

i

0

0

!

o

0

!

o !

o

1

0

i 89-Ac

0

i

o

0 i

0

0

I

o

o

0

0

0

! 90-Th

1

I

o

0

I

o

0 !

1 !

1

0 1

0 !

J

i 91-Pa

1 i

1

0

!

o

0

!

o i

0

0

!

o |1

*•

j 92-U-000

o I

°

0

I

°

1

j

0 j

0

1

0 ! '

o !

o !

o !

o i

o !

°o !

j

i 92-U-230 i

!
o !

o !

o

I

°j

0 |

0 j

0

0

0

0

j

0 j

a

! 92-U-232 !

o I

o i

0 !

o !

o I

o !

o !

o I

0 i

o

j 92-U-233

I

° j

0 |

0 j

0 j

0 j

1

0 |

2

j

1 1

A

! 92-U-234 j

1 !

o !

o !

o !

o !

o !

o !

1 i

0 !

2

I 92-U-231

i °j

0

!

i

C

69
OTHER
ELAS.
SCAT.
(EL)

TOTAL
(TOT)

ELEMENT

RES.
PAR.
(RES)

SCAT.
C/S

IHEL.
SCAT.
(INL)

Appendix 1
NNDC
GAMMA &NEUTRON
EMISSION(NG)CHARGEDPARTICLE
EMISSION(NX)! 92-U-235

2

0 j

0 i

o I

o :

4 !

o !

j 92-U-236

1

0

0

0

0

0

i 92-U-237

0

0

0 i

0

0

0

! 92-U-238

2

1

0 '

0

0

3

! 12-U-239

0

0

0

0

0

1 92-U-oxi

0

0

0

0

i 93-Up000

1 94-Pu-OOO

00! 94-Pu-23S

0| 94-Pu-239

1! 94-PU-24O1

j 94-Pu-241 i

FISSION(NF)

TOTAL
REQUESTS

OTHERS
!

1

0

i j

0

2

0 !

0

0

0

0

10

0

it>

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

i

°

0

0

0

0

0

3

1

5

I

1

1

1

5

1

0

2

1

13

1

1

0

0

7

1

0

2

1

13

! 94-PU-242 I

1 i

o

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

4

j 94-PU-243

0

!

o

0

0

0

i

°i

o

0

0

I

G

! 34-Pu-244

0

!

o

0

0

0

!

o

0

1' !

o i

1

! 94-PU-245 !

o !

o

0

0

0

!

o

0

!

o

0

!

c

!

o !

o !

o !

o !

o i

0 !

3

0

0

0

0

!

o

o !

o

0

i

0

!

o !

o !

o !

o !

o !

o !

o '!

o !

o

o I

o !

o i

0 !

o !

1

i

0 !

1

i

0 !

2

!

o !

o !

o !

o

!

o !

o I

o !

o !

o

1

j 95-Am!

i! 96-Cm

0 i! 97-Bk0i 98-Cfi! 99-Ea

0

1

•

i

11

!

j

13

o !

.

4

!iOO-Fm

!

o i

0

!

o i

0

!

o !

o i

0

!

o i

o !

0

1 TOTAL

!

180 !

148 !

75 I

67 !

356 !

317 !

492 !

41 i

71 !

1,747

71

Appendix 1
NNDC

Request Statistics
TABLE IIIA

1 January 1985 to 31 December 1985
Area 1
EXPERIMENTAL CHARGED PARTICLE AND PHOTOHUCLEAR DATAPROTON
(P)

GAMA
(G)

DEUTERON
(D)

ALPHA
(A)

ELEMENTOTHERSTRITON(T)TOTALREQUESTS

o !

o !

o I

o !

o !

0

o !

o I

0

o !

o !

0

0

o !

o !

0

o !

o !

|

0

0

0 j

0

0

0

0

|

0

0

oS

o !

0

o i

o !

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 j

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

!

O-NN

j

o !

o

]

1-H

I

oI

j

2-He

!

|

3-Li

!

4-Be

j 5-B

I

;

|

!

6-c

|

7-N

0

0

0

0

0

0

o

!

8-0

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

i 9-F

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

j 10-Ne

0

0

0

0

0

o

o ',

! 11-Na

0

o

o

0

0

o. i

0

i 12-Mg

0

o

0

0

I

o

o !

i 13-A1

0

o

0

o

i

0

o !

i 14-Si

0

!

o

i

0

o I

o !

o !

o !

! 15-P

o !

o

!

o

0

0

0

°
o

I
I

° I
o i

° j

0 j

0 1

o

o I

!

!

•

!

o

!

• o

! 16-SI° I', 17-Cl

i

0

i

I

0

i

i

!

i

0

]

I

° '
o !

72
TOTAL
ELEMENTi 18-Ar,| 19-K

ALPHA.

DEUTERONGAMMA

PROTONTRITON

(A)

(D)

(G)

(P)

(T)

o !

0

0

0

i

REQUESTS

OTHERS

o !

o !

o !

O i

o !

0

0

0 ]

0

o j

o !

o !

o !

0

! 20-Ca

|

o1

o

21-Sc

J

0 !

0

0

0

0

0

0 j

j 22-Ti

o !

0

o !

o !

o !

0 !

o '

j 23-V

0

o

!

0

0

0

0

o j

!

oI

0

o !

0

o !

!

'

O

i

i

i 24-Cr!

0o! 25-Mn

!

0

0

6

2

0

0

8

! 26-Fe

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !i

i 27-Co

0

0

0

0

0

0

o i

! 28-Ni

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

i 29-Cu

0

0

0

0

0

0

o i

! 3O-Zn

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

i
t

31-Ga

0

0

0

0

0

0

o ,

I 32-Ge

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

j

! 33-As

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

i

j 34-Se

0

o

0

0

0

0

0

!

! 35-Br

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

| 36-Kr

0

0

0

0

0

0

I

o !

! 37-Rb

0

o

o

0

0

0

i

O

0

0

° j
o !

0

0

o

0

!

o i

!

o i

o I

o ]

o !

o !

o !
o i

o i

o !

o I

o !

i

i

!

] 38-Sri°! 39-Y

i

0

!

o

I

I
o !

0

!

o

i

0

4O-Zr

i

0

j 41-Nb

!

o !

o

!

o !

! 42-Mo

i

0

i

0

i

0

i

o

i

O

i 43-Tc

i

0

I

o

i

0 i

0

i

O

!

!

1

i

0 j

Appendix 1

TRITON(T)

OTHERS0i 0

TOTAL N N D C
REQUESTSELEMENT

ALPHA(A)

DEUTERON
<D)

GAMMA
(G)

PROTON
(P)

44-Ru

0

0

0

0

i 45-Rh

0

0

o!

0

o !

0

o !

I 46-Pd

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 47-Ag

0

0

0

0

o

0

o !

j 48-Cd
1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

i 49-In

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

i
i

0

i

1

t 50-Sn

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

j 51-Sb

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 52-Te

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 53-1

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

i 54-Xe

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

| 55-Cs

0

0

.0

®

0

0

0

o !

o

0

0

0

0

0

| 57-La

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 58-Ce

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

| 59-Pr

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

j 60-Nd

1

1

24

2

0

0

28

j 61-Pm

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

', 62-Sm

0

-21

3

o

0 i

24

, 63-Eu

0

0

0

0

0 !

0

! 64-Gd

0

o

0

0

!

o

! 56-3a

;

! °

i

0

!

o

!

•

o

•

0

o i

o i

o !

o

0

i °I

0

0

0

0

0

0

I 67-Ho

i

0 i

0

o

o

!

o !

o

0

I 68-Er! • o!

1

4 1

1

I

o

0 !

6

o

o

I "o"

i 65-TbIj 66-Dyo!

1! 69-Tm

0 !

'o

i

0

!

T"1
i

74
ELEMENT

ALPHA

DEUTERONGAMMA

PROTONTRITON

(A)

(D)

(G)

(P)

(T)

7O-YT3

1

0

0

71-Lu

!

0

| 72-Hf'! 73-Ta!

TOTALREQUESTS

0 j

0

0

j

0

0

0

4 i

0

o !

0

4

!

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

|

o !

0

o !

0

o i

oI

o I

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

j 76-Os

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 77-Ir

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

j 78-Pt

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

i 79-Au

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

j 74-tf! 75-Re!

j

OTHERS!

|jt

i 8O-Hg

0

0

0

0

0

0

o 1

{ 81-Tl

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

' 82-Pb

0

0

0

0

0

0

o I

i

1

! 83-3i

0

0

0

0

0

0

o 'i

i 88-Ra

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

j 89-Ac

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 90-Th

0

!

o

o

0

o

0

o !

| 91-Pa

0

I

°

0

o

0

0

o j

o i

0

o ;

o !

o

0

o !

0

0

0

0

!•

o

0

0

o !

{ 92-U-OOO!

j 92-U-230

!

j

!

! 92-U-231

!

o !

o

!

o

o

!

o

0

| 92-U-232

I

°

|

0

0

i

°

0

i

°i

! 92-U-233

i

° I
0 1

o

i

0

o !

o !

o i

o

i 92-U-234

!

0 i

0

i

0

0

0 I

0 i

0 !

!

j

Appendix 1
NNDC

75
ELEMENTGAMMA(G)PROTON
(P)

ALPHA
(A)

DEUTERON
(D)

0

0

0

1 92 -U -235

TOTAL
OTHERS REQUESTSTRITON

0

o ;

0

0

0

0

0

o 1
1

j 92-U-236

0

0

0

i 92-U-237

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

1 92-U-238

0

0

0

o

0

0

0

i

i 92-U-239

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

i

! 92-U-oxi

0

0

0

0

0

0

1 93-Wp

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !
o !

j 94-Pu-OOO

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 94-Pu-238

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !

j 94-Pu-239

0

0

0

0

0

0

' 94-Pu-240

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !
o !

i

1

i

i

1

!

1

] 94-Pu-241

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 94-PU-242

0

0

0

0

0

0

o !
o !
o !
o !

j

•

j

94-Pu-243

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 94-PU-244

0

0

0

0

0

0

, 94-Pu-245

0

0

0

0

0

0

! 95-Am

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0'

0

0

0

0

0

o

0

0

0

0

o

0

0

0

o !
o

0

0'

0

0

0

i 96-Cm

o !
o !

1

i 97-BkIi 98-Cfti! 99-Esi00'100-Fm

!

o

0

!

o !

o

0

0

!

o !

! TOTAL

!

i

2

!

59 !

8.

0

0 i

70 !

77
Appendix 1
NNDC
Request Statistics

TABLE III
1 January 1986 to 31 December 1986
Area 1
EXPERIMENTAL NEUTRON DATA

ELAS.
SCAT.
(EL)

INEL.
SCAT.
(INL)

GAMMA &RES.
NEUTRONPAR.
EMISSION
(RES)
(NG)

OTHER
SCAT.
(C/S)

CHARGEDPARTICLE
EMISSION(NX)ELEMENT

TOTAL
(TOT)

I O-N

|

2I

1|

0

01

0

01

0 I

1-H

|

13 |

7i

2I

0 i

01

7 |

i 2-He

|

6I

4

0I

0

4 !

1 3-L1

|

6 j

1

2!

0

4

2

1

| 4-Be1

FISSION(NF)

OTHERSTOTALREQUESTS

01

0

3I

0

o

2

31 I

01

8

0

1

23 |

0

6

13

0

0

28 |

0

0

1

2

0

2

12 |

2

14

7

11

0

4

46 |

7

11

18

28

0

8

148 |

0

0

3

3

0

0

13 I

6

3

3

0

1

31 |

0

1

0

0

0

2 |

I 5-B

5

2

I 6-C

26

29

1
21

|
•
|

7-N

4

1

2

^-0

9

4

5

| 9-F
>

1

0

0

0
0

| 10-Ne

1

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0 1

3|

I 11-Na

1

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0 1

3 |

0

0

0

5 i

0 I

1 1

' 0

6

2

6 1

o
o
o 1
o 1
o 1
o1

o 1

17 1

o1

51

0 I

51

o1
o1

* I

I 12-Mg

1

1| 13-Al3

0

1

11 — o1o| 14-Si

!

2

3 r

o

0 1

0

0

0 1

I 15-P

|

1

0 !

0

0 !

0

2

2 1

I 16-S

I

1 !

3 1

o

0 1

o 1

0 !

0 1

17-Cl

1

' 1 1

0 !

oE

0 1

0 I

1 1

0 1

2

78

ELEMENT

ELAS.
SCAT.
(EL)

TOTAL
(TOT)

INEL.
SCAT.
(INL)

GAMMA & CHARGED
RES. NEUTRON PARTICLE
PAR. EMISSION EMISSION FISSION
(NF)
(RES)
(NG)
(NX)

OTHER
SCAT.
(C/S)

18-Ar

|

1 |

0 1

0 1

01
01

0 I

0 1

01
01

19-K

|

1 |

0 I

2O-Ca

|

11 1

4 I

4 I

01

14 |

1 21-Sc

|

1 |

0 1

0 I

01

! 22-Ti

|

1 |

01

0 I

I 23-V|1 |2I! 24-Cr

|

1 I

25-Mn

|

I 26-Fe|i 27-Co|| 28-NiTOTALOTHERS REQUESTS
0 1

5I

01
01
11

1 1

0 1

oi
01

0 1

o1

39 |

01

01

01

01

01

11

01 •

o i

01

11

01

01

2 1

0 I

01

01

3I

01

01

01

6I

oI

01

01

0

01

4 |

01

0i

5I

1 |

oI

01

01

0

3I

0 I

01

0 !

4 |

11 1
1|

3

2 !

01

23

8

5I

0I

0

52 |

0

1

01

1

4

2 !

0

0

9 1

3

3

2

0

0

1

5

0

0

3I

4 1

14 |
1

—___

I 29-Cu

1

0

0

0

i 30-Zn

6

5

5

8

I 31-Ga

4

3

4

5

| 32-Ge

1
1

4
3

0
0

0
0

I 33-As| 34-Se

1

0

o

0
10

12

5

15

40
___

0

0

18 I

0

3

92 |

0

1

1

20

6

7

0

0

0

0

0

49 |
5 |

0 1

o

0

0

0

;1

0

0 1

o

0

0

0 1

11

i 35-Br

!

1 1

01

o 1

o 1

01

o I

0

0

0 1

1i

I 36-Kr

1

1 !

0 1

o 1

o 1

o 1

o f

o

0

o1

11

| 37-Rb

|

1 1

01

o 1

o 1

o1

o 1

o 1

o 1

1 1

11

| 38-Sr

|

1 1

o 1

o 1

o 1

o1

o 1

o 1

o 1

01

l1

I 39-Y

|

1 !

01

o1

o

0 1

o 1

11

|

7 |

7 1

io 1

o

1 1

o !
01

0 1

| 40-Zr

o 1
o1

o 1

1 1

26 |

| 41-Nb

f

1 1

o 1

o 1

o1

o1

01

o1

o 1

11

| 42-Mo

1

18 1

8 1

oi
3 I

o1

24 1

21

o1

o 1

55

I 43-Tc

1

o 1

0 1

o 1

01

0 I

01

o 1

o1
01

o 1

0

79
Appendix 1
NNDC

ELAS.
SCAT.
(EL)

INEL.
SCAT.
(INL)

GANMA &
RES. NEUTRON
PAR. EMISSION
(RES)
(NG)

OTHER
SCAT.
(C/S)

CHARGEDPARTICLE
EMISSION(NX)FISSION(NF)

TOTAL
REQUESTSELEMENT

TOTAL
(TOT)

! 44-Ru

|

0

01

01

01

01

0|

01

01

01

01

I 45-Rh

|

1|

01

01

01

01

01

0 !

01

11

I 46-PD

|

1|

o

oI
o

01

01

01

01

0!

01

11

47-Ag

|

'1|

0

0 ! -

0|

01

0i

01

0

0

11

! 48-Cd

j

1|

16

1 !

0I

104 |

20 |

11

01

01

143 |

1 49-In

!

5I

1

4

01

22 |

9

21

o

01

43 |

1 oo-Sn

|

1

0

o

01

01

4

01

0

0 !

5I

I 51-Sb

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1I

1 52-Te

2 j

0

0

0

42

18

0

0

01

62 |

1 53-1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 !

1 |

| 54-Xe

2

1

0

2

1

10

0

0

18 |

| 55-Cs

0

0

2
0

0

0

0

0

0

0I

| 56-Ba

1

0

0

0
0

0

0

0

0

0

| 57-La

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1 !
1
1 |
2 |

0

0

1 |

OTHERS02| 58-Ce000| F" Pr

1

0

0

0
0

0

0

0

0
0

| 6O-Nd

1

0

0

0

2

0 I

0

0

0

3 |

! 61-Pm

0

1

o

o

6

4

0

0

0

11 1

I 62-Sm

1

0 ;

o!

0

0 1

0 i

0

0 1

0

1 1

t 63-Eu

1

0

0 I

0 I

o I

0 1

o !

0

o 1

o

0|

| 64-Gd

1

1

0 I

o 1

o 1

0 1

0 1

'0 I

0

0 !

1 1

| 65-Tb

1

0 !

0 1

0 1

o 1

o 1

o I

0 I

0

0 1

0!

j 66-Oy

1

1

0 I

0 >

o :

01

0 !

0 1

o 1

o 1

1 1

| 67-Ho

1

1 1

o 1

o 1

o 1

0 1

o 1

0 I

o 1

| 68-Er

!

0 1

0 1

01

o !

0 1

o !

o 1

1 1
0 1

| 69-Tm

1

0 I

o1

o1

oi

o 1

o 1
11

o1
o1
oI

o1

1

o1

80
GAfW & CHARGED
ELAS. INEL. OTHER RES. NEUTRONPARTICLE
SCAT. SCAT. SCAT. PAR. EMISSION EMISSION FISSION
TOTAL
(EL)
(INL)
(C/S) (RES) (NG) (NX)
(NF)
OTHERS REQUESTS

TOTAL
(TOT)

-LEMENT
70-Yb

|

0I

0

0|

01

01

01

01

01

0 I

01

71-Lu

|

0 I

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

0 I

01

72-Hf

|

1 |

01

oI

0 I

01

01

01

01

0 I

11

73-Ta

|

2 I

01

01

01

0 |

01

01

01

01

21

74-W

|

4 I

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

01

4 I

: 75-Re

|

6 I

6I

2I

01

31 1

12 |

41

21

1

I 76-Os

|

7 |

1 |

0 1

01

16

01

0

01

0

24 I

0 I

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 i

0

0 I

s I

11

0

oi

29

1

0

o

0

39 |

| 79-Au

1

0

0

0

0

6

0

o

0

|
7 |

j 30-Hg

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

i 77-Iri 78-Ptj

1 |——__—i! 81-T1

1

0

0

0.

0

0

0

0

0

j 82-Pb
1
i 83-Bi

13

2

•3

0

3

4

1

3

1

1
1 |
30 |

3

3

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

81

| 88-Ra

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 |

0

1

1

0

0 I

0

0

0

0 1

2|

6

1

0 1

0 1

1 I

2

1 1

5

0 1

16 I

0

0 1

0 1

o 1

o I

0

t

o 1

0 1

o 1

0|

| 92-U-000 |

1 1

1 1

1 I

0 1

0 1

o 1

0 1

0 1

0 1

3|

i 92-U-230 1

o I

0 I

0 1

o I

0 1

o 1

o 1

o 1

o 1

0 I

] 92-U-231 I

0

I

o 1

o I

0 I

0 1

o 1

o 1

o 1

o 1

0|

| 92-U-232 1

o 1

0 1

o !

0 l

o 1

o 1

0 1

2 1

o 1

2 I

| 92-U-233 1

1 1

0 1

o 1

o 1

o 1

1 1

o 1

9 1

0 1

10 |

| 92-U-234 1

0 I

o 1

o 1

o 1

o 1

0 |

0 |

2

0|

2 |

! 89-Ac

!

j

I
I

»»•«.

I 90-ThI 91-Pa1

81
Appendix 1
NNDC

GAMMA &.LEMENT

ELAS.
SCAT.
(EL)

TOTAL
(TOT)

INEL.
SCAT.
(INL)

CHARGED
RES. NEUTRON PARTICLE
PAR. EMISSION EMISSION FISSION
(NX)
(NF)
(RES)
(NS)

OTHER
SCAT.
(C/S)

TOTAL
OTHERS REQUESTS! 92-U-235 |

3 |

2I

11

0I

11 1

31

0I

28

0|

48 |

1 92-U-236 |

1 |

0 !

01

01

0I

0I

01

2I

0t

3 I

! 92-U-237 |

0 |

0I

01

0I

0I

01

01

01

0|

0 !

i 92-U-238 |

7 |

3

4

0

0 !

71

01

16 !

01

37 |

92-U-239 |

0 |

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 !

01

01

92-U-oxi |

0

0

0

o

0

0

0

0 !

0i

0I

|

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

41

01

5I

i v.f-Pu-000|

O

0

0

0

0

0

0

0!

01

0i

I 94-Pu-238|

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

4 !

i 94-Pu-239|

2

1

1

0

0

0

0

10

0

15 I

0

0

0

1

0

4

0

5I

0

—
—™0

0 _______ _

0

3

0

51

0

0

1 93-Np_! 94-Pu-24O|

00i 94-Pu-241|

00

I 94-Pu-242|
i 94-Pu-243|
t*1
i 94-Pu-244|! 94-Pu-245|

0

1
0

——

0

t

1
0

—__•.—— j _*—. -_.—

1

0

3I

0

0

0

0

0I

0

0

0

0

0

0I

0

0

0

0

0I

0

5

0

0
2

0

61

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0

0

0 i

0

0

3 1

0 I

2

0 !

5 |

o 1
o1

o

o 1

0|

6 1

6|

i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1
1| f Am|1__ _______
I 96-Cm
|

0

1
0

0

0

-•••
0

2
——————

00| 97-Bk

1

0

0

o i

o

o f

0 1

| 98-Cf

|

0

0 1

|

0

0 I

0 !

01

o!
o1

0 I

|

o1
0 1
o1

01

|100-Fm

o 1
o 1
o 1

0 1

| 99-Es

o1
o 1
o1

o|

1 1

o1
o 1
o1

141 1

87 I

22

402 1

222 I

170 |

55 |

25 1 1,437 |1-—— ____——1 ________|TOTAL

|

262

1

0|
11

83
Appendix 1
NNDC

Request Statistics

TABLE IIIA

1 January 1986 to 31 December 1986
Area 1

EXPERIMENTAL CHARGED PARTICLE AND PHOTONUCLEAR DATADEUTERON GAMMA
(G)
(D)

TOTAL
REQUESTSELEMENT

ALPHA
(A)

| O-N

|

0

0I

0!

2I

0

0I

0I

0I

2

1 1-H

|

0

11

0

6

2

1

0

0

20

| 2-He

0

8

0

0

4

1

0

0

13 I

| 3-L1

1

20

7

11

13

3

0

0

55 |

| 4-Be

5-

8

0

5

0

3

0

0

21 I

| 5-B

7

4

11

4

3

0

6-C

6

7

13

0

5

2

0
0

| 7-N

0

4

~—
0

0

0

0

| 8-0

________
4

6

0

24

0

1

0 ______

| 9-F

2

3

0

12

0

1

0

0
0

| 10-Ne

0

3

0

2

0

3

0

0

8I

| 11-Na

11

7

9

4

0

0

0

0

31 |

| 12-Mg

12

2

11

0

10

0

| 13-Al

17 1

8

6

13

0

9

2

0
0

| 14-Si

7 !

1

0

6

0

5

0

0

19 I

| 15-P

1 1

0 1

0

5

0

0

0

0 I

6|

| 16-S

1 I

1 I

0

U

0 1

*

0 I

0 I

17 1

1 1

1 I

0 !

3

0 1

o

0 I

o!

51

1

1 17-Cl

1

PROTON(P)

8
2

TRITON
(T)

22

17

-~

OTHERS

2HE-3
(2H)

HE3
(H)

29 |
41 |
28 |
35 |
18 |

52 |
55 |

84

ALPHA
(A)

| 18-Ar

|

2

2|

0 i

3

01

01

01

0 1

7 |

1 19-K

1

1 |

o

0 !

2

01

3I

01

0

6 1

I 20-Ca

|

0

3

0

18

0 !

1 !

0

0

22 |

I 21-Sc

|

1

5

0

7

0

1i

0

0

14 |

| 22-T1

|

1;

3

0

6

0

11

0

0

11 1

9

6

4

6

0

1

0

0

26 |

2

5

0

12

0

1

0

0

20 |

| 25-Mn

5

3

5

7

0

7

0

1

| 26-Fe

21

1

1

20

0

0

0
0

0

43 |

I 27-Co

23

4

7

52

0

0

0

0

86 |

I 28-N1

30

11

12

36

0

0

1

0

90 |

| 29-Cu

11

8

12

26

0

27

0

0

84 |

| 30-Zn

15

6

3

19

0

0

0

0

43 |

1 31-Ga

3

0

0

41

| 32-Ge

5

6

1,

8

0

2

0

0

22 |

| 33-As

5

2

4

7

0

5

0

0

23 |

| 34-Se

1

5

2

14

0

14

0

0 t

36 |

| 35-Br

2

1

0 I

19

0

0

0

0 I

22

I 36-Kr

1

2 1

0

4 1

0

0

0

0 I

7|

I 37-Rb

3 1

3 I

2 1

11 1

0 !

0

0

0 !

1 9j

2 |

1 |

1 1

11 !

0

0

0

15 !

j 39-Y

1

3 I

* 1

io !

0 1

0

0 1

o i
o1

18

| 40-Zr

18 1

5 i

17 1

41 !

0 I

0

o !

81

o 1
o1

o 1
1 1
0 1
0 1-

o1
oI
o 1

12

| 23-V| 24-Cr

1 38-Sr

1I

DEUTERON GAMMA
(0)
(G)

4

PROTON(P)

0i

TRITON
(T)

33

1

HE3
(H)

TOTAL
OTHERS REQUESTSELEMENT0I| 41-Nb

1

4 1

3 1

0 1

4 1

0 1

I 42-Mo

1

0 |

28 1

0 1

I 43-Tc

1

o1
0 I

o1

0 1

o1

o1
o1

2HE-3
(2H)

1

0

28 i
0

85

ELEMENTPROTON(P)

DEUTERON GANMA
(6)
(0)

ALPHA
(A)

TRITON(T)

Appendix 1
NNDC TOTALOTHERSREQUESTS

2HE-3
(2H)

HE3
(H)

| 44-Ru

0I

0

0

0|

0

0

0

0

01

| 45-Rh

6

3

2

5

0

0

0

0

16 1

| 46-Pd

2

8

2

10

0

0

0

0

22 |

| 47-Ag

9

5

5

9

0

0

0

0

28 |

| 48-Cd

4

2

2

21

0

0

0

29 |

I 49-In

12

3

7

7

0

0

0

29

| 50-Sn

10

39

26

0

2

0

80 |

| 51-Sb

4

3
5

0
0

3

3

0

6

0

0

21 |

I 52-Te

2

10

2

16

0

1

0

0

31 |

| 53-1

25

5

8

0

0

0

0

38 |

| 54-Xe

1

0
0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1 |

I 55-Cs

0

0

5

3

0

0

0

0

81

| 56-Ba

0

1

4

1

0

0

0

0

6 1

| 57-La

5

1

3

2

0

0

0

| 58-Ce

2

_

3

2

0

0

0

| 59-Pr

0

0
0

5

4

0

0

| 6O-Nd

2

1

16

3

0

1

51-Pm

0

0

0

0

I 62-Sm0013

I 63-Eu00| 64-Gd

0

0

1

"

0

0

11 1
7 |

0

0
0

91

0

0

0

22 |

0

0

0

0

01

8

0

0

0

0

21 I

5

0

0

0 !

0

0

51

5

1

0

0 i

0

0

6I

5

0

0

0

o

0

8I

1 65-Tb

03| 66-0y

0

0

0

0

0 i

0 I

0 !

0

0 |

I 67-Ho

o

o

5

0

0 i

0 1

0

5I

| 68-Er

0

0

3

0

0

oI

o
o

0

3I

| 69-Tm

0

0 I

0

3

0 1

0 1

0 !

0

3 |

86

ELEMENTOEUTERON GAWIA

ALPHA

(0)

(A)
| 70-Ybi

PROTONTRITON

(P)

(T)

(G)

HE3
(H)

OTHERS

2HE-3
(2H)

TOTAL
REQUESTS

0 i

01

0 j

3I

01

0 1

01

01

31

I 71-Lu

0

0I

31

1

01

0 !

0 !

01

41

| 72-Hf

0

01

4 I

0

01

01

0 !

0!

41

| 73-Ta

1

0 !

71

7

01

01

0

0 !

15 |

| 74-W

0

6 I

11

5

01

0

0

0

22 |

| 75-Re

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

01

| 76-Os

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

01

0

0

0

41

0

9I

0

40 |

0

0

10 |

1

| 77-Ir0| 78-Pt00| 79-Au

1
0
-

0
3

0:
__

4

0

8

1

—

i

0
1
0

0
0

9

22

0

0

0

10

0

9

0

0

0

0

91

6

| 80-Hg00| 81-T1

00| 82-Pb

0

2

13

11

0

0

0

0

26 |

| 83-81

0

1

0

7 !

0

0

0

0

8I

0 |

1

0

1 1

o

0 1

0 I

o 1

2!

0

0

0

0 1

o

0

oI

0 !

0
4|

I 88-Ra

I| 89-Ac0________

0| 90-Th

i

o 1

4-

0

0 1

o

0 f

0 f

0

| 91-Pa

i

0 I

0

0

0 1 —————

0 !

0 !

0

o
0

1 1

o!

0 f

3

| 92-U-OOO

1

01

0

0 !

1
2I

1 92-U-230

I •

o 1

o

0

0 1

o

0 I

0 I

0 1

0

| 92-U-231

1

0 1

0

0

0 I

o

0 !

oi

o i

0|

I 92-U-232

1

2 1

o

0 I

10 1

0

0

0 !

0

12 |

| 92-U-233 1

4 1

1

0

0 1

0 i

0

0

5 |

| 92-U-234

5 1

3 !

0

0 1

o
o:

o

0 1

o

8

1

87

Appendix 1/NNDC

ELEMENTPROTON(P)

DEUTERON GAWA
(D)
(G)

ALPHA
(A)

TRITON
(T)

2HE-3
(2H)

HE3
(H)

OTHERSTOTALREQUESTS| 92-U-235

6

41

1

0

0

0

0

0

11 1

| 92-U-236

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

2I

| 92-U-237

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0I

| 92-U-238

2

5

0

4

0

1

0

0

12 |

| 92-U-239

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0I

| 92-U-oxi

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

21

| 92-U-CMP

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

2I

| 93-Np

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6I

• 94-Pu-OOO

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0I

| 94-Pu-238

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

3I

| 94-Pu-239

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

3I

0

0

0

0I

0

0

0

2|

0

0

0|

1

0

"

0— ™
0

| 94-Pu-240

0

0

0

0

0

| 94-Pu-241

0

0

0

2

0

| 94-Pu-242

0

0

0

| 94-Pu-243

0| 94-Pu-244

0| 94-Pu-245

0

0

11

| 95-Am

0 1, 96-Cm

0 1—

o
0
0

0

0
0

1

0 1

!

0

0 11

0

0

0

0|

0

0

0 I

o

0

0

0I

0

0

0 I

0

0

0|

0

0

0 1

0

0

0

0

0 1

0 1

o
o !
o!

0 1

0 !

0

o

1898 || 97-Bk

0

0

0

0

0 1

o
o

| 98-Cf

0

0

0

0

0 1

0

0 I

0

0

0

0 I

0 I

0

0

0

0 1

o
o

0

0

0 1

0

0

o I
o
o
o

345

770

23 I

128

8

0

0

| 99-Es0

I 99-Es0|— — — — „ —|100-Fm| TOTAL

1

0 1

356

0
266

0

0|
0

0
0 !

0I

89
Appendix 2
NEA-DBNEA Data Bank

Progress report to the Nuclear Reaction Data Centres
October 1987

Introduction
The two main topics of interest concerning the Data Bank over the
past year have been the Joint Evaluated File (JEF), and the proposal forpartial redirection of the Data Bank's work programme. After discussion at
successive meetings of the Steering Committee for Nuclear Energy, and consideration by a 'Wise Men' group set up by the Steering Committee, the proposals are converging towards a limited redistribution of Data Bank resources,
with a division of scientific manpower about two-thirds/one-third between
neutron data plus computer program srvices, and new data and program
projects in nuclear waste management and safety. A total of eight scientificstaff would be working on the 'traditional' projects, including JEF.
I. Neutron Data Compilation and CINDA
During 1986, a total of 136 EXFOR entries, of which 45 were newcompilations, were transmitted to the other data centres. Nineteen of the
new compilations referred to data that had been published during 1986.
Shifting the window to the 12-month period September 1986 to August 1987, wefind 31 new works from area 2, with 22757 data points.
Following the transfer of the responsibility for the production of
the CINDA book to the IAEA and the standardisation of the exchange format,
the transmission of CINDA entries between the data centres is working verysatisfactorily. During 1986, the Data Bank updated the CINDA coding manual,and distributed the new version to the other centres and to CINDA readers inarea 2. More of the CINDA scanning work is now done in the Data Bank.
Customer service
A small increase, about 7 percent, in the number of requests fornuclear data was encountered in 1986. 194 requests were answered and the
distribution of requests for the different data categories are shown in thefollowing table:
JEF data
EXFOR data
Evaluated data (except JEF)
Documents
Miscellaneous

363

245S
18%
16%
6%

The number of data records sent out was about the same as in 1985, i.e. 36
million. In the first eight months of 1987, eighty-six requests wereanswered, with an average of about 140,000 data records per request (asagainst 180,000 for 1986). The large number of records reflects the dispatchof evaluated data, and of large volumes of -experimental data to evaluators.

II.

90
The Joint Evaluated File (JEF)

Semi-annual meetings of the JEF working groups, on Benchmark Testingand Evaluation, are held in November and May, with a meeting of the
Scientific Coordination Group in May, most recently in May 1987. A newversion of the file, JEF 1.1, was announced by the Data Bank in the fourthissue of the newsletter JEF-1 News, in October 1986.
In addition to regular maintenance work on the JEF data and theassociated checking and verifying programs, the Data Bank has cooperated
with Petten to update the resonance parameter information of almost all thefission products. Further, two new elemental evaluations were created at theData Bank and a large effort was put into plotting the most important JEF-1
cross section data and comparing them with experimental data from EXFQR, inorder to assist the evaluators working on new evaluations for JEF-2. A
computer code was developed to translate automatically an evaluated file in
ENDF-5 format to ENDF-6 format, which is expected to be the format for the
JEF-2 file, although a decision cannot be taken until the corresponding
version of NJOY has been received and tested at the Data Bank.
In order to ensure that the new evaluation for U-238 is ready intime for the JEF-2 file, where it will be of crucial importance, the Data
Bank has worked very closely with AERE Harwell. A senior Data Bank physicist
has shared in the new analysis of experimental resonance data, and a consultancy contract was placed for additional computing work on these data.
Progress has been good. Versions of the REFIT resonance fitting program havebeen run on VAX, CRAY and IBM computers.
The 175-group cross section set for shielding calculations,
VITAMIN-J, was updated to include covariance information and true absorption
cross sections. Shielding benchmark calculations were also performed incooperation with Winfrith, and the results were presented at the NEACRPSpecialists' Meeting, Paris, in October 1986. The Data Bank has cooperated
with the EFF (European Fusion File) project in the creation of a fusion datagroup cross section set, called GEFF-1.
Results of burn-up and fuel cycle calculations of different benchmark specifications, using the JEF-1 library, have been reported fromKarlsruhe and Cadarache, as well as analysis of LWHCR experiments from
Wurenlingen. The possible inconsistency between the evaluated thermal values
by Axton and the results from the benchmark testing of the JEF-1 library has
been discussed and a small subgroup formed to investigate this problem andto report back to the JEF and CSEWG communities.
III. Computer program services
During 1986, 1319 program packages were distributed to requesters;
135o of these, or 177 programs, were sent to users in non-OECD countries.
This total figure has increased only slowly since the establishment of theData Bank; on the other hand, the areas of user interest, and the ratios
between different categories of users, have shifted more markedly. For the
first nine months of 1987, 1080 packages were sent out. About 15 percent ofthese program packages were sent to IAEA member countries who are notmembers of OECD.

ni

Appendix 2
NEA-DB

It is interesting to compare the "Bestseller lists" of programs sentout in these two years:
1986

1987

INTERTRAN
SCALE-3
NJE-4.00
DYNA3D
LINPACSLATEC-3
MINEQL-EIR
EISPACK-3
NJE-4.00
SCALE-3

The programs in the two lists illustrate the importance of making special
efforts in preparing, testing and presentation of codes AENTERTRAN-I ispackaged in a transportable version suitable for IBM, CDC and VAX computers,
while SCALE, MINEQL and NJE were presented in specialised Data Bank
workshops/, and also the need of users for access to high-quality packagesof mathematical subroutines /SLATEC, EISPACK, LINPAC/.
Program Acquisition and Testing
In order to keep the computer code collection up to date, and inorder to include more codes from new priority areas, special efforts weredevoted to computer code acquisition during 1986. 148 new program packages
were acquired in 1986, and 99 new codes included in the master files. For
the first nine months of 1987, 58 new programs have been master filed.
Particular care has been taken in testing program packages released
within the Probabilistic System Analysis Codes project (PSAC) for predicting
the long-term effects of radioactive waste burial. In addition, the Data1
Bank has provided support to the PSAC users group in its recent ' level 0code comparison exercise, and further more complex exercises are planned forthese codes.
IV. Validation of Nuclear Model codes
The series of benchmark comparisons of nuclear model codes has
continued with a "blind benchmark" where cross-sections, including preequilibrium effects, were calculated for W182. Eight answers had been
received by the end of 1986, and analysis of the results has now started.
Specifications for two new international statistical model code comparisonswere prepared and sent out, for Weisskopf-Ewing and Hauser-Feshbach
calculations. About twenty contributions were received and a draft reportwill be prepared by the end of 1987.
First steps have been taken in the development of a Reactor Physics
Data Base and Validation System, starting within the reactor shielding area.
Other areas planned for inclusion are reactor criticality and core latticeexperiments.

92
V. Activities in the areas of Nuclear Waste Management and Reactor Safety
The Data Bank's work can be seen either as a set of long-term
projects in support of national programmes in reactor physics, for which
validated computer programs and nuclear data are needed, or as theapplication of knowledge in nuclear and reactor physics, with skills incomputing and data base construction, to a variable group of problems in thefield of nuclear energy. The latter view emphasizes the Data Bank's inherent
flexibility, and the encouragement it has received from its Management
Committee in carrying out preliminary work in support of the NEA main
Secretariat's efforts in nuclear safety and waste management.
Discussion over the past year in the Steering Committee for Nuclear
Energy, and the report by a "Wise Men" group of experts convened to examine
the question in detail, have led to proposals for inclusion of work in theseareas, at an increased level, in the Data Bank's programme of work. It is
expected that four scientific staff members will be engaged in these newactivities in 1988.
At these different meetings, delegates stressed the importance toMember countries of maintaining a high level of service on nuclear data andcomputer programs for nuclear energy. Particular emphasis was placed on theneed to complete the Joint Evaluated File project to a high standard; it wasrecommended that manpower for these activities should not be reduced below
the 1987 level of eight professional staff unless experience at that manninglevel had shown clearly that this could be done without affecting thequality of service.
Thermochemical Data Base (TDB) and ISIRSThe development of the NEA Thermochemical Data Base (TDB) has gained
further momentum in 1986-7. The international critical review on Uranium
data made considerable progress, and reviews on two new elements, Americium
and Technetium, have been started. The Uranium expert team met in December
1986, to discuss the state of the review and to reach a consensus on thecurrent draft of the report, which then already covered about 250 typewritten pages. A similar meeting was held in September 1987 to coordinate
work on the Americium evaluation. Twenty-seven requests for unevaluated datacompilations were serviced between May and December 1986.
A data input program for IBM computers for the ISIRS (International
Sorption Information Retrieval System) data base has been developed by CISI.
The program has been announced to users and if requests arise for otherversions of this program, e.g. versions for PCs, the Data Bank would be
responsible for making the necessary modifications to the program.
The Probabilistic System Assessment Codes (PSAC) User Group
Effort has been concentrated on the acquisition of fully developed
and documented codes (SYVAC codes from AECL and UK DOE, LISA from JRC
Ispra). These codes have been made available to the Data Bank and have been
fully tested, documented and packaged.

q-jAppendix 2

NEA-DBThe development of a standard interfacing system is under way, so as
to allow easy interchange of modules within the code. This is particularly
important in avoiding duplication of effort, reducing development time andreducing costs. In order to simplify the analysis of results obtained with
PSA codes and allow homogeneous comparisons of results from code intercomparison exercises, standardized interface and output files are required.
A proposal for a standard interface file, based on different suggestions of
the PSAC user group members, was adopted by the November 1986 PSAC users
group meeting. Utility routines were developed by the Data Bank for handling
this format.
A first international code comparison was conducted on a hypothetical safety assessment case study for radioactive waste disposal systems. The
final report, showing the good agreement achieved amongst the different
codes, will be published in the course of 1987.
Work related to Nuclear Safety
The structure of the IRS (Incident Reporting System) data base wasredefined and coding sheets were sent to the coordinators in order tofacilitate compilation of the reports. The Data Bank had to restructure andreload the data base to conform to the new system. A small program waswritten to input new data and to correct old entries in the data base, andexisting entries are being revised to bring them up to a common standard of
information content.
A special Task Group within CSNI (Committee on the Safety of Nuclear
Installations) has developed a code validation matrix for LWR safety codesand designed an assessment procedure, as well as defining specifications forthe documentation of experiments. The Data Bank has been included in
discussions on the further development of this project within NEA, theprocedures for obtaining experimental data and potential problems instandardising these data.
VI. Computing at NEA Data Bank
The in-house computing facilities comprise a VAX-11/78O linked to a
MicroVax II, with a total of 2.6 Gigabytes of magnetic disk memory. An
optical disk unit will be installed in order to bring most of the master
files of tested computer programs on line, in order to simplify customer
service procedures.
The Data Bank's use of networks increased considerably during
1986-7. The Data Bank is connected to the French TRANSPAC network and isalso a node in EARN (European Academic and Research Network). Data Bank
staff continue to access local French CISINET via the HASP link to themain-frame computers. So far, owing to difficulties in file transmission
between different computers, most use of the networks has been to send
electronic mail messages to other establishments, but an increasing numberof computer codes and nuclear data sets are now distributed this way. A
network service, allowing authorised users to consult the computer program
abstracts and data files, is under development.

95
Appendix 3
NDS
NDS Status Report to the 1987 NRDC Meeting
H.D. Lemmel, Oct. 1987
1.

Staff

The main change was that D.E. Cullen left, who was the head of theComputer Unit of the Nuclear Data Section. His position is temporarily
filled by changes of responsibility within NDS. Also V. Piksaikin ended
his contract and went back to his home country. Marisa de Horaes Cunha
is now in charge of monitoring requests, replacing Martha Oshomuvwe who,
however, came back to the Section for a temporary appointment. Prof. R.
Janev joined the Section as the head of the unit for atomic and molecular
data. M.K. Mehta re-joined the Section for a one-year appointment fortechnical co-operation projects.
Wang Dahai joined the Section
preparing, among other work, Chinese EXFOR entries.
2.

CINDA

The CINDA compilation from area 3 is uptodate. It serves as thebasis for EXFOR compilation.
CINDA86 and CINDA87 have been produced
according to the new decentralized scheme for CINDA compilation and filemaintenance. The transition did not create any major problem, except fortime delays. We ask the other centers for their co-operation by sending
CINDA entries continuously. We cannot process everything in the lastminute before book production, or we have to fix the deadline several
weeks earlier. A special problem is the slow speed of magnetic tapes
coming from CJD which are in the mail up to 10 weeks. The CINDA
co-operation with CJD as one of the Four CINDA Centers cannot function
unless CJD finds a way to speed up the data transmission considerably.
After the recent revision of the structure of the CINDA network, thecomputer programs (input checking, file maintenance, exchange with othercenters) have been revised, so that input can be prepared in batch mode
(mainly new entries) or online (mainly revisions and updates).
The design of the CINDA cover which still showed an antiquatedpunched card, was modernized to illustrate the function of the data
centers between data producers and data users, and to advertise EXFOR.
The future publication of CINDA is to be reviewed now. "Archival
issues" of CINDA have been published in 1979 ("CINDA-A" covering theperiod 1935-1976) and 1984 ("CINDA-B" covering the period 1977-1981).
Meanwhile, many additions and revisions have been made to thecontents of CINDA-A and CINDA-B, including the insertion of EXFOR-index
lines; consequently, it is proposed to publish in 1989 a new archival
issue covering the entire period 1935-1986. The then current issue
CINDA-89 would cover the years 1987-1989.
3.

The EXFOR System

The EXFOR System and its rules were the main topic of the Technical
NRDC Meeting in Vienna in October 1986. Since then, some more new
proposals have been submitted by means of CP-Memos. See a separate
working paper. However, it is noticeable that the EXFOR System hasstabilized and seems to have reached a final state. The number of new
proposals and technical problems encountered has decreased significantly.

96

The main problem remaining is the fact that the formal correctness of
the EXFOR exchange tapes (TRANS tapes) is still insufficient.
Centers
continue to create each other extra workload because TRANS tapes received
from other centers must be reviewed and corrected before they can beprocessed. See a separate working paper for the most disturbing mistakes
encountered.
Another problem is the frequent lack of response when correction andretransmission of specific EXFOR entries is requested.
It should be
realized that EXFOR files remain incomplete without speedy response tothese retransmission requests.
4.

EXFOR Compilation

During the past 2 years 7 TRANS tapes with 69 new EXFOR entries and
57 revisions were transmitted originating from the following countries:
revisedArgentina

new
2

Australia

21

Bulgaria

1

China, P.R.

20

7

Czechoslovakia

3

8

Egypt

2

3

German Dem. Rep.

4

7

Hungary

12

9

India

4

1

Korea, Rep.

1

Morocco2

8

Pakistan

2

1

Poland2

4

Romania43South Africa

2

1

Taiwan2

2

Thailand1

Vietnam1

Yugoslavia

1

69

2

57

This includes neutron data only. Due to lack of staff there was notime for the compilation of CPND or Photonuclear Data. Even in the fieldof neutron data we have, unfortunately, a considerable backlog including
primarily fission-product yield data (about 40 entries) and some otherdata considered of secondary importance.

97

Several charged-particle data entries
S-series were reviewed and finalized.
5.

Appendix 3
NDS

receivedfrom China

in theEvaluated Data

The following evaluated data files were received and documented for
distribution.
-

A new ENDF/B formatted library for fisson-product yield data by
the Chinese Nuclear Data Center (Wang Dao).

-

A new version of the Minsk evaluations (V.A. Konshin) of U-235,
Pu-239, 240, 241, 242 which was distributed as a supplement to the
IAEA actinides file INDL/A.

-

Several files for structural materials to be included in the INDL
library and in the international fusion data file IRDF. Someevaluations are in the ENDF-6 format.
The new evaluation of the Cf-252 fission neutron spectrum by
W. Mannhart was received and documented for distribution. It isin an ENDF similar format. The inclusion of its covariance matrix
in proper ENDF-6 format may still present some problems.

-

6.

A new evaluation of charged-particle induced neutron source
reactions by M. Drosg, Vienna, was received and documented for
distribution. It includes Legendre fits to angular dependences ofneutron energies and cross-sections.

WRENDAThe publication of WRENDA 87/88 is in preparation. It is behindschedule because we are still waiting for contributions from several
countries of area 2.
7.

Publications
The routine publications continued including-

INDC reports
Nuclear Data Newsletter
CINDA
Atomic and Molecular Data Bulletin
IAEA-NDS-documents

and some more.
of meetings.
*

Of special importance were some handbooks and proceedings

Handbook on Nuclear Activation Data. IAEA Technical Report Series No.
273 (1987). Contributions by leading experts (compiled and reviewed
by K. Okamoto) contain data surveys and up-to-date compilations forvarious data required for applied nuclear activation techniques.
Brief summary of contents:- Isotopic abundances, half-lives, decay modes.
- Neutron-reaction standard reference data.
- Neutron-source reactions: energies and cross-sections.
- The neutron spectrum of a Cf-252 fission-neutron source.

98-

Decay data for radionuclides used as calibration standards.
Neutron activation cross-sections for thermal neutrons, for 14 MeV
neutrons, for 1 to 20 MeV neutrons, for Cf-252 fission neutrons.
- Activation
cross-sections
andthick-target
yieldsforcharged-particle induced reactions.
- Photonuclear cross-sections.
This handbook (820 pages) is available for 1640.- Austrian Schillings
from the IAEA Division of Publications, Box 100, A-1400 Vienna,
Austria.
*

Nuclear and Atomic Data for Radiotherapy and Related Radiobiology.
Proceedings of an IAEA meeting, Rijswijk, Netherlands, 16-20 Sept.
1985.
IAEA, 1987. K. Okamoto (ed.).
Contains 27 papers and 3
working group reports covering topics such as physical basis of
biologicalradiationeffects,
beam
production,
dosimetry,interactions of neutrons, pions, charged particles, and others. Available for 950.- Austrian Schillings from the IAEA Division of
Publications, Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria. (Compare the note in
Nucl. Data Newsletter No. 10 how to buy priced IAEA publications.)*

Properties of Neutron Sources. IAEA-TECDOC-410. Proceedings of an
IAEA meeting on Properties of Neutron Sources, Leningrad, USSR, 9-13
June 1986. Includes chapters on pulsed white neutron sources, fastneutron fields, Cf-252, monoenergetic sources, filtered beams, 14 HeV
neutron sources, medical applications, and others.
Available
costfree upon request.

*

Applications in Nuclear Data and Reactor Physics. D.E. Cullen,
R. Muranaka, J.J. Schmidt (ed.). Proceedings of a workshop held at
the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy,
17.2.-21.3. 1986, in co-operation with the IAEA Nuclear Data
Section.
Contains 26 lectures on reactor physics and related
computer codes. Published by World Scientific Publishing Co., P.O.
Box 128, Farrer Road, Singapore, 994 pages, 1986. Not available from
IAEA.

*

INDC(NDS)-195. Proceedings of the IAEA meeting on Data Requirements
for Medical Radioisotope Production, Tokyo, 20-24 April 1987.
K. Okamoto (ed.). Contains all papers, a summary and recommendationsof three working groups on experimental data, data calculation andcomputer files, data compilation.

*

INDC(NDS)-192. Covariance methods and practices in the field of
nuclear data. Proceedings of a meeting under this topic, Rome,
Italy, 17-19 Nov. 1986. V. Piksaikin, editor. Contains review
papers and recommendations about treatment of covariances in
evaluated nuclear data files, with emphasis on dosimetry, neutron
spectra, actinide cross-sections, fission-product yield data, andothers.

*INDC(NDS)-198. L. Greenwood et al., Summary of the IAEA meeting on
Analysis of the REAL-84 Intercomparison Exercise on spectrum
unfolding in dosimetry by foil activation, 27-29 May 1987, Jackson
Hole, USA.

*

CIAMDA, a CINDA type index to atomic and molecular collision data
relevant to fusion research.

99

8.

Appendix 3
NDS

Customer services

The number of requests received has stabilized. There are about 700
requests per year received from over 60 countries.
This includes
approximately
30
140
480
50

requests for experimental data
requests for evaluated data
requests for documents
requests for data processing computer codes

700
In response, about 270 magnetic tapes are dispatched per year and1800 documents. For the first time, close to 200 floppy diskettes weresent out in 1987.
The distribution of the "IAEA Nuclear Data Newsletter" is now over
3000, most of them to area 3, 300 to areas 1, 2, 4 upon individual
requests.
Data
retrievals
sentout
to customers
are accompanied
by"IAEA-NDS-documents" summarizing contents and/or format of the data files.
Various format conversions ("standard", "edited",
graphical plotting) are provided upon request.
9.

"RECENT-output",

Programming and Systems Development
The EXFOR programming has been improved by-developing procedures for on-line compilation
EXFOR entries,

or correction of-

updating the EXFOR check program,-finalizing the computation format ("C4") of EXFOR.

Before Red Cullen left the Section, he finalized a set of codes suchas-

the 1987 version of the ENDF pre-processing codes
a set of codes for graphical plotting of EXFOR data and
ENDF-formatted data
and a code package for model parameters and cross-section data.

All of them operate on a mainframe computer and on a personal computer(PC/AT). Consequently, codes and data are available not only on magnetic
tape but also on floppy diskettes with appropriate documentation.

100

10.

On-line center-to-center data transmission

The IAEA host computer can be accessed via two packet-switching
networks, DATEX-P and TYMNET via Radio Austria (of the Austrian PTT).
There are also direct dial-up ports at 300 Baud available.
The ID of the Austrian DATEX-P is 2322, and our host-ID is 6221047.
The ID of the Austrian TYMNET Node is 2329 and our Host-ID is 11507701.
The telephone number for direct calling is Vienna (222) 23-55-75.
A TSO Logon ID has been established for users wishing to access the
IAEA mainframe: RN2. The password is "IAEANDS". The TSO SEND command
can be used to send a message (send the message to user RNS, Monica
Seits).
In case you have an IBM 3274 (or equivalent) connected to your Public
Packet Switching Network, please tell us your IDBLK and IDNUM in advance,
so we can define your cluster to VTAM. In this case you can use SPF(full screen support)- a Mailbox system is available (send the message touser MONICA).
At present, NDS has access (via Radio-Austria) to the TRANSPAC
network in France and the ITT-UDTS, MCII/WUI, TIMNET, TRT, IPST, ACCUNET,CONNECT and various other networks on a test basis in the USA, as well as
various other networks in other countries. We are in the process ofestablishing access to the EARN and BITNET networks via IEZ (AustrianInteruniversity EDP Center).

101

Appendix 3
NDS

TELEPHONE LIST POR NDS
Nuclear Data Section

Ext.

Room

1.

(ARCILLA's ex office)6382

A23-37

2.

AUNG Sofie

1716

A23-22

3.

BAUMGARTNER Liesl

1711

A23-144.

BUSH Georgina

1720

A23-24S.

DE MORAES Marisa

1726

A23-35

6.

G AND ARIAS CRUZ Dario

1714

A23-18

7.

GOULO Valery1708

A23-118.

JANEV Ratko

1731

A23-439.

LAMMER Meinhart

1727

A23-36

10. LEMMSL Hans

1717

A23-20

11. LORENZ Alex

1712

A23-16

12. MARTINEZ RICO Jose

1718

A23-23

13. MCLAUGHLIN Kevin

1723

A23-32

14. MEHTA Madhu

1706

A23-10IS. MUNDY Gordon

1720

A23-24

16. NEUMANN Maureen

1710

A23-14

17. OKAMOTO Koichl

1713

A23-17

18. OSHOMUVWE Martha

1725

A23-34

19. SCHMIDT Joe

1709

A23-12

20. SCHMIED Sabine

1719

A23-22

21. SCHWERER Otto

1715

A23-1922. SEITS Monica

1724

A23-3323. SHEIKH Khalid

1730

A23-42

24. SMITH Jim

1729

A23-41

25. WANG Dahai

1707

A23-09

103
Appendix 4
CJD

The main results of the USSR neutron data activities
in 1986 - 1987
V.H. Manokhin
Introduction.
This report gives a review of the main results of neutron data activities in the USSR and CJD's activity in 1986 - 1987.
A leading objective of neutron data activity in the USSR is as
before the supplying of nuclear power engeneering by neutron data.
This activity remains actual and is conducted in the following directions :- precise measurements of the most important cross sections;- experimental and theoretical investigation of nuclear structure and nuclear reaction mechanism and development of model representations, which can meet practical demands from point of view ofreliability;- development of evaluation methods, evaluation of nuclear data
and further development national evaluated data library.
Experimental neutron data.
1. llovrdays the experimental neutron data library of the USSR
area contains 900 works. During two years the TRAITS 4060 - 4066
are transmitted which contains 64 new works and 137 corrected works,
2. The measurements of the'most important nuclear data are con tinued in Institute of Physics and Power Engeneering, Institute of
Huclear Investigations of AH USSR, Radium Institute, Institute ofAtomic Energy and so on. The results are published in the journals"Atomnaya Energia", "Yadernaya Fizika" and "Voprosy Atomnoi ITaukii Techniki", Series "Yadernye Constanty". The titles of some im portant works are given in the referencies / 1 - 13 / of Appendix.
3. Recently the essential work has been carried out in the CJD
on data processing procedure. The computational format has been developped for presentation of experimental and evaluated cross sec tion data. The programmes are written and put into operation fordata transmission from the EXFOR and ENDP formats into computational format and for data input to plotter.
We think to form in the computational format temporary data bases for practical tasks (evaluations, theoretical calculations andso on).

104

In this connections the possibility of adaption of the format
to new data types is envisaged.
Bibliographic data.
1. The technology of checking the CI1TDA data input in Reader
Format is realized.
The work on development of the technology of data input into
Master File is progres. The first half of next year it is suppo sed to prepare and send to EDS the magnetic tape with CIUDA data
file for direct inclusion into MASTER FILE. So as the results having been approved by NDS, the CJD could begin symmetrical 4- latteral CIITOA data exchange.
2. In 1986 - 1987 the CJD transmitted into EDS the 9270 CIEDA
records. The most part of these records contains the replacementof CCP - codes by LAB - codes and other kinds of corrections, ITew
information is put into 370 records. The CJD carried out the checkand correction of four CIHDA data sets transmitted from KUDC. The
work on link of CI2JDA - entries with E2FOR - entries are under way.
Evaluated neutron data.
1• In FEI the library of the recommended evaluated neutron data
files (BROI-ID) is formed. The library contains full neutron data files—5in the neutron energy range of 10
ev - 20 Mev for main technological, structural and fuel reactor materials, for radiation shielding
materials, for materials of air, soil, biological tissue. The fission products,' neutron data of which are given in the library, proviue
more 80% of radiative capture of fission product mixture in any re actor. The neutron data files of the main fuel, structural and technological reactor materials, and also of the most important fission
products are formed on the base of the recent evaluations, made in
FEI, IJE AIT BSSR and TU of Dresden. The data recommended by IAEA
are adopted for the isotopes used as neutron standards. For othermaterials those available foreign files has been adopted which data
were more reliable in soviet specialists opinion. The resolved andunresolved resonance regions have been replaced in the most of files
the results of recent soviet evaluations.
All the evaluated neutron data library files were checked on theformat and physical consistency of included data and transmitted into group representation by means of GRUCON and UJOY programmes.

105

Appendix 4
CJD

The Nuclear Data Comission of GKAE recommended the Library as
a "base of development of the advanced neutron constant systems
for neutron calculations in various scientific and engeneering regions. The cal culat ional accuracy given by the use of the libraryrequires the check by means of comparison of calculational resultswith experimental data obtained in reference experiments on critical assemblies, reactors and facilities for shielding study andso on.
As new neutron information and the results of library test areappeared it is supposed to reexamine the data for the main reactor
and shield materials, to wide the list of nuclei, which data must
be presented in the library, and the list of data (for example, toinclude gamma - production data in neutron reactions and so on ) .
2, At the time being the work on evaluation of curium isotopes,
nitrogen, niobium, zirconium is under way, A number of articles on
nuclear data evaluation is publiched in "Yademye Konstanty" and in"Atomnaya Snergia".
3, The testing of the data files for iron, cromium and nickel
has been carried out on the base of the results of integral measurements on critical assemblies. Preliminary results displayed agood quality of CJD' full files of the materials mentioned.
4, A new version of threshold reaction cross sections library(30SP0R-86) is prepared. The number of isotopes has been increased,some data reexamined, uncertainty values added. Some threshold re action cross sections from 30SP0R have been included as curves withrelated tables into Handbook on Nuclear Activation Data.
Theoretical work in CJD.
Along with nuclear data evaluation CJD pays a considerable at tention to improvement of theoretical models, used for nuclear re action cross section analysis. One can point out three main directions of these works. Above all this is developments of consistentdescription of nuclear level density in r.dde energy excitation range. Main problems of such description are connected with taking into account shell, superfluid and collective effects, and were ana lysed in /19/ for structural material nuclei. At the present timethe development of this direction is aimed to combine statisticaldescription, working well at excitation energy above several Mev,

106

with, combinatorial calculational methods, describing properly observable spectra of nuclear low lying levels. The second directionof theoretical works is connected with development of unified op tical model. The key issues here are the taking into account ofstrong couple of many channels and correct partition of compoundand direct process contributions, including direct multistep transitions. The taking into account of many channels is important also for analysis of intermediate structure of neutron cross sec tions and consistent description of neutron strength functions.
The third direction is aimed to improvement of pre equilibrium nuclear decay model. The works are concentrated, firstly, on separa tion of direct process contribution in inelastic scattering reac tions, in the charge exchange and charged particle knock - out reactions; secondly, on obtaining correct microscopic description ofn - quaziparticle excitations and formfactors for particles emit ted in decay, For verification of theoretical models a variety ofexperimental data on neutron threshold reaction excitation func tions and particle spectra are used,
A number of results is given in the reports submitted to Kiev
conference this year.
W R E I? D A.
The analysis of the USSR requests in the list WRENDA - 83/84
has been made for the next issue of the list. The 14 request were removed as fulfilld or duplicated. In soviet specialists opinion the required accuracies are not achieved in other cases.
C J Dr3organization work.

1. Early 1986 the meeting on nuclear data of representatives of
the Council of Mutual Economic Assistance countries was conve ned. The reports submitted has been published in Yadernye Konstanty.
2. CJD took active part in formation of program and conducting
the IAEA Interregional Training Courses in Riga. The 5 lectu res were delivered by CJD's coworkers.
3* The CJD's coworkers participated in organization of the UllUnion Symposium on ITuclear Fission (Obninsk, June 1987).

107

Appendix 4
CJD

P U B L I C A T I O N S ,1. The following works has been published in VAHT (Yadernye
Konstanty Series).
1.1. The collection of works containing the results ofdata analysis, fulfilled by soviet specialists (Jssue 4,1985).
1.2. A number of works on the neutron data evaluation ( seereferences / 1 4 - 1 8 / in Appendix ) •1.3. The proposals on END? format modification for presentation of data in the unresolved resonance region (Issue 1,
1986 ) .
2. CJD submitted 9 reports to International Conference on ITeutron
Physics.

108

The works on measurements and evaluation ofneutron data in 1986 - 1987
1. Bokhovko 11,7. f Kazakov L.B., Kononov V.ET, et al.
Measurement of neutron radiative capture cross sections for W
isotopes in the energy range 5 - 400 kev. - In: VANT, Ser. Yadernye Konstanty, 1986, issue 1, p. 39.
2. Kazakov L.3., Bokhovko M.V., Timokhov V.M., Voevodskij A.A.
Measurements of neutron radiative capture cross sections for^ U in the energy range 4 - 460 kev, - In: VA1TT, Ser. Yader nye Eonstanty, 1986, issue 3, p. 37.
3. Goverdovskijj A.A., Gordjjushin A.K., Kuz'minov B.D. et al.
Measurement of fission cross sections of heavy nuclei inducedby 16 Mev neutrons, - Atomnaya Energia, 1986, v. 60, p. 416,
4. Pursov B.I,, Baranov E.Yu., Klemyshev M.P. et al.
Measurement of J U fission cross section in the neutron energy range 0.06 - 7.4 Mev. - Atomnaya Energia, 1986, v. 61, p.383.
5. Kozharin B.3., Kovalenko S.S., Selitskij Yu.A. et al.
Thermal neutron fission cross section and fission resonance integral of ^'Np. - Atomnaya Energia, 1986, v. 60, p. 419.
6. Goverdovskiy A.A., Gord.jushin A.K., Kuzminov B.D. et al.
Measurement of fission cross section ratio of J Th and JJXS in
the neutron energy range 5 - 1 0 Mev. - Atomnaya Snergia, 1986,
v. 61, p. 380.
7. Fomushkin 3.?., ITovoselov G.P., Vinogradov Yu.I. et al.
243
The fast neutron fission cross section of^Cm. - Atoranaya
Snergia, 1987, v. 62, p. 278.
8. ?omushkin 3.3?., Uovoselov G.P., Yinogradov Yu.I. et al.
24.7

Measurement of fission cross section energy dependence ofCmin the neutron energy range 0.02 - 3.0 Liev. - Atomnaya Energia,
1987, v. 62, p. 279.
9. Vorotnikov P.E., Dmitriev 5.V. et al.
?4.1
Intermediate structure in ^ Am fission cross section induced
by 0.08 MeV - 1.3 MeV neutrons. - Yadernaya Pizika, 1986, v.44,
p. 1403.

Appendix 4

109

CJD

10, Goverdovskij A.A., Gordjushin A.K., Kuz'minov B.D. et al.
Measurement of fission cross section ratio of ^ U and 2-^U j_n
the neutron energy range 4 - 1 1 MeV. - Atomnaya 3nergia, 1985,
v. 59, p. 429.
11. Pursov B.I., Klemyshev M.P., Samylin B.P. et al.
Measurement of fission cross section ratio of ^ U and -^U in
the neutron energy range 0.34 - 7.4 MeV. - Atomnaya Energia,
1985, v. 59, p. 284.
12. Adamchuk Yu. V., Voskanjan M.A., Muradjan G.V.,Shchepkin Yu.G.
Measurement of alpha valus on 239^*Tu resonances. - Atomnaja
Energia, 1986, v.61, p.199.
13. Korzh I.A., Measurement and analysis of neutron scatteringcross section on structural materials in the neutron energy
range 0.5 - 9.0 MeV - In: VA1IT, Ser. Yaderaye Konstanty, 1987,
issue 1, p. 18.
14. Ignatjuk A.V., Maslov V.M.
Consistent neutron cross section evaluation of
VANT, Ser. Yadernye Konstanty, 1986, issue 4, p. 43.

Cm. - In:

15. Pursov B.I., Kud.jaev G.A., Smirenkin G.E.
Past neutron fission cross section of curium isotopes. In: VA1TT,
Ser. Yadernye Konstanty, 1986, issue 4, p. 37.
16. Pronjaev 7 .G., Ignatjuk A.V.Reevaluation of iron neutron cross sections. - In: VA1TT, Ser.
Yadernye Konstanty, 1986, issue 4, p. 51.
17. Ignatjuk A.V., Kravchenko I.V., Hanturov G.N.
The library of recommended evaluated neutron cross sections forthe most important fission products. In: VA2TT, Ser. Yadernye Konstanty, 1987, issue 1, p. 3.
18. Kon'shin V.A., Salakhov U.K.
Evaluation of averaged resonance parameters of J 3 U , Pu isotopes
and 241 Am on the base of data in resolved resonance region. In:
VAXTT, Ser. Yadernye Konstanty, 1986, issue 3, p. 46.
19. Blokhin A.I., Ignatjuk A.V. Consistent description of the neut ron spectra and excitation functions of threshold reactions on
structural materials. Report, presented to CRP Meeting on Methodsof ITuclear data calculation for structural materials (Bologna,1986)

87-12971 (0678E/312e)

1 U

Translated from Russian
Appendix 5
CAJaD

DATA ON CHARGED-PARTICLE-INDUCED REACTIONS:SOME PROBLEMS(Information for the Ninth Consultants1 Meeting of the
Nuclear Reaction Data Centres)
by F.E. Chukreev
I.V. Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy

Moscow - 1987

Since the Eighth Meeting of the Centres, the Atomic and Nuclear Data
Centre of the USSR State Committee on the Utilization of Atomic Energy hasconcentrated on the formation of radionuclides of medical interest in its
nuclear reaction data compilation. The compilations have also encompassed anumber of publications on thermonuclear fusion reactions and on neutron
spectra.
The main difficulties in the data compilation work arise from the use ofnon-standard measurement units. By "standard" we mean "barn" and its
derivatives for cross-sections and "curie/A.h" for reaction yields. In theoriginal publications, however, we often encounter measurement units including
target energy losses of the form " jicurie/yA.h.MeV". In some cases theseunits can be standardized by calculating the total mass stopping-power,
although this naturally leads to uncertainty as various tables of total mass
stopping power may be used. When authors' data are converted in this way, we
say so in the notes.
A second problem is the use of a single term for different quantities.
Most authors use the term "thick target yield" to meanS

112

and related quantities. However, in papers by M.S. Lagunas-Solar's group(USA), "thick target yield" appears to be used for the integrand expression
from the conventional "yield". This group uses the terra "cumulative yield"
for Y, which bears no relation to the ZXFOR "CUM". We wrote to Lagunas-Solar
requesting a definition of the term "thick target yield", but there has been
no reply. I am hoping for assistance from our American colleagues, as an
explanation would benefit us all: we are not the only ones who have had
trouble with this. Data from this group have been included in Ref. [1], forexample, and if used by readers could lead to misunderstandings and errors.
A third problem is the presentation of data in graph form. By no means
all graphs are presented in such a way that the information in them can beread easily and accurately, and they are often very small. Sometimes even the
co-ordinate axes are distorted, making the graphs unsuitable for processing.
In such cases we try to contact the authors, and here I should mention thevaluable help we have received from the Julich group (Professor S.M. Stocklin
and his colleagues) and the University of Hamburg (Professor Scobel and hiscolleagues).
In addition to the compilations we have been performing evaluations.
This year we have published our data [2] on neutron yields from light elements
bombarded by alpha-particles, and these data have also been applied to thecalculation of neutron yields from fuels of various compositions.
At the last meeting we took responsibility for co-ordinating thecompilation efforts of our network of Centres devoted to charged-particleinduced nuclear reactions. Since then we have received only two communications (from RIKEN and BNL), to which we replied. In both cases we trust that
unnecessary duplication has been avoided.

REFERENCES[1] ALBERT, P. et al., Technical Report No. 273, IAEA, Vienna (1987) 537.
[2] VUKOLOV, V.A., CHUKREEV, F.E., Atomnaya Ehnergia, 62 4 (1987) 232.

113
Appendix 6
CDFE

CDPE FOR PHOTONUCLEAR RESEARCHES
I.N. Boboshin, V.V, Varlamov, V. V. Surgutanov, A.A. Khoronenko,
A,P. Chernjaev
Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University,
Moscow 119899, USSR

Reporting the works carried out the results obtained, and the problems faced with, at CDPE from mid-1985 to early in 1987 is expedient
to begin by discussing the problems* The major present-day problem
has arisen from actual absence of any international exchange by
photonuclear data, first of all the data of machine-sensible form.
True, within the said period, the CDPE received an excellent editionof Photonuclear Data-Abstract Sheets from Professor E. Puller of USA
NBS and, besides receives routinely the NSR

file photonuclear data

output samples from Professor S. Pearlstein and copies of the JAERI
editions from Professor A. Hashizume. These materials make it easier,to some extent, for the CDPE and its cooperative institutions ( including the specialized nuclear data centers (SCJAD) at several universities) to solve the problems of processing the distributing
photonuclear data.
Regretfully, it has to be stated once again that, despite therespective actions of the 7th and 8th IAPA Consultant's Meetings
the second version of B»L. Berraan'a compilation on the photonuclear reaction cross sections obtained using quasimonoenergetic
photons. In this connection,

CDPE is planning to extend the scopeof its activities in compiling photonuclear works and to include theworks of physicists from abroad, of course with an appropriate STATUS.
In particular, this concern the EXPOR format records of the data published as plots in the Photoneutron Cross Section Atlas and obtained

114

using quasimonoenergetic photons (PREPRINT UCRL-78482, 3.L. Berman,
1976) and also the data published in other similar editions and scientific periodicals.
The following works carried out during the above mentioned period
in accordance with the main trends of the GBFE activities should be
noted.
1. Computer processing of data in the EXFOR format
The next consecutive exchange magnetic tape CDFE

TRANS M005 has been

prepared for sending the IAEA NDS. The tape contains numerical dataof 45 experimental works of Soviet physicists.
Exchange tape TRANS M006 is being completed.
All the data arrays on the photons and charged-particle induced
reactions distributed through the channels of international exchange,
namely the files with indices A, B, C, D, S, R, P, etc., have beenobtained, adopted, and used actively.
2. Activities with bibliography
The series of the CDFE information bulletins "Photonuclear Data"
has been continued with issues 8 and 9 containing systematized
information about the experimental works on photo-nuclear reactions
published in 1984 and 1985, respectively, in scientific periodicals
both in the

USSR and abroad.

The materials of CDPE information bulletins Nos.1-9 have baen
used to publish and dissiminate Data Index "Photonuclear Data
1976-1985" where the photonuclear research results obtained during
the decade are presented in an ordered form. The Data Index includes
a table summarizing all the information about the features of theexperiments carried out and about its main results and contains
the complete list of references, the author index and the indices ofthe elements and reactions studied.

Appendix 6
CDFE

3. Preparation of reviews on given subjects
The results of studying the ( / , X /» ) reactions on light and mediu
nuclei obtained during the last two decades have been systematized
and analized. The ENSDF file has been used to specify the spectroscopic information about low-lying levels of atomic nuclei from
7
52
Li to

Cr

and to compile the partial cross sections of the pro-

cesses of occupation individual states of final nuclei of the reactions with emissinn of neutron, protons, deuterons, tritons, andcx^ -particles. The results of the analysis have been published in
the review "Photonuclear Data ( /, X /> ) Reactions",
The issue "Photodisintegration of Lithium Evaluated Cross
Sections of Channels and Reactions" has been published in addition
to the CLPE information Review" "Photodisintegration of Lithium,
Atlas of Cross Sections" published and distributed earlier to carry .
out the program for preparing the evaluated photonuclear data.
The issue includes a brief description of the approach used for theevaluation, the detailed information about the experimental works
on photodisintegraion of Li isotopes, both included in the Atlas(1984) and published later, and the results of analyzing various
6 7
partial cross sections of ' Li photodisintegration. The evaluatedcross sections of channels and photodisintegration reactions for
6 7
the ''Li isotopes are presented as plots and in numerical form.
The numerical data are planned to include in a next CDPE exchange
magnetic tape.
4« Evaluation of photonuclear data
The photonuclear research show quite a number of characteristicfeatures which compicate the analysis and evaluation of the results
obtained. The features include:(1) the relatively small reaction yields, hence a low systematic

116

accuracy of measurements. The statistics has to be improved bymaking long-time experiments, thus by increasing the systematic errors
due to drift of meters;(ii) the continuous/ -quantum spectra used in most cases makeit necessary to solve the inverse problem to obtain the cross section
by means of unfolding of thereaction yield curve. The methods

avoiding such problem ( radioactive sources, radiative-capture
reactions) deal primarily with low intensities of/ -quantum

beams and, therefore, involve a poor statistics again;(iii) the methods for solving the inverse problem appear to be
diverse, thereby giving rise to definite systematic differences in
the results.
Considering the circumstances outlined above the CDPE has
designed a special approach to evaluate the photonuclear data, firstof all the cross sections. The essence of the approach is to find thefeasible contributions of disregarded systematic errors from analyzing and evaluating the generalized characteristics of initial crosssections, such as integral cross section and center of gravity. The
systematic errors are allowed for using the procedures of an appropriate renormalization ( scaling along the cross section axis) anda recalibration ( scaling along the energy axis) of individual initial cross sections.
The method designed was used to evaluate a great number of the
6 7' Li photodisintegration reaction and channel cross sections. The
results of the evaluation were published in the review mentioned
above.
Sticking to the photonuclear data evaluation program, the CDFE
has evaluated the U isotope photodisintegration cross sections.
The results obtained will be published as an appropriate review.

117

Appendix 6
CDFE

The numerical data on the cross sections estimated will be presented
on one of the CDPE exchange magnetic tapes.
5. Activities on the Actions of the IAEA NDS
In conformity with the CDFE proposals (MEMO CP/M-6,7) and with the
IAEA KDS

Actions, the next LEXPOR entries describing the useof the BIB teywords MOM-SEC and EMS-SEC and of the quantity-parameters ECO, MCO, EMS has been prepared (see Apprendix).
6. Activities in processing requests
Within the reviewed period the CDPE received and processed more than
500 requests concerning bibliography and some 300 requests concerning
numerical information about the properties of atomic nuclei and thecharacteristics of the low- and medium-energy nuclear reactions.
7« Center Personnel
All the papers and materials concerning the international nuclear
data exchange are to be forwarded to V.V. Varlamov, Head of the
CDPE of the Institute of Nuclear Physics of Moscow State University.
8. Specification of address
CDPE, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University,
Moscow 119899, USSR.

119

Appendix 7
RIKEN

Status Report of RIKEN Nuclear Data GroupIn these two years efforts were continue to collect thereaction cross sections to produce radioisotopes which areusefull for medical uses, the isotopes are 11C,.1 3 N , 1 5 0 , . 1 8 F,
28
M g , 5 2 Fe, 6 7 G e , 7 4 A s , 7 7 Br, 8 2 Br, 7 7 Kr, 8 1 Rb, 8 2 m R b , 1 1 1 I n ,123
X e , 1 2 7 X e , 1 2 3 I , 1 2 4 I , and1 2 5 I . During this period a IAEA
consultant's meeting on Data Requirements for Medical
Radioisotope Production were held in Tokyo with co-operation with
our group and various situations to make radioisotopes for
medical use were clarified.
1 Exfor files
We have compiled constantly the cross sectional data ofcharged p a r t i c l e induced reactions for medical use and data
occured in Japan in exfor f i l e s but t h i s period we have notransmission to other centers.
In this point, reflection should
be made.
2 Reference f i l e s
The reference f i l e s of secondary reports appeared in 1986
were compiled in the form of nuclear structure references coding
and submitted to Brookhaven National Laboratory.
3 Coperation of ENSDF
Japanese group (represented by Dr.T.Tamura) coperate for theevaluation of nuclear structure in the mass region from 1 1 8 to
129 and 1 cycle of evaluation were completed.
3 Programming
By utilizing a graphic display and i t s supporting program, af l e x i b l e graph describing program has been completed.
This
program can make graphs u t i l i z i n g the d a t a .
When many
experimental results are expressed in a graphic form, i t is very
convenient to know the present status of the results. We are now
editing these graphs of excitation curves.

120 -

editing a handbook of the nuclear cross sections to produce
radioactive isotopes for medical use has been proposed after thetechnical meeting at IAEA.
We compared some of the excitation curves to the calculated
results by Alice code, but the results are not yet satisfactory.
An example are shown in Fig. 1 in Appendix. The effort is now
continuing to t h i s d i r e c t i o n to obtain good f i t t n e s s ofexperimental results.

4 Monitor Reactions
In collecting the excitation functions of reactions which
produce the radioisotopes for medical use, we have found that
there exist sometimes discrepancies between the experimental
results.
In view of these discrepancies, we realizethe
importance of the evaluations of monitor reaction cross sections.
The monitor reactions utilized in the measurements of reaction
cross sections which are useful for the production of medical
isotopes are sumarized Table 1 in appendix. If each reaction
cross section were compared with ehse of monitor reactions, akind of systematic errors would be much reduced.
For the proton induced reactions, the measurements of crosssections of the12C(p,pn) )11C reaction have been made mostprecisely and in wide range of incident energies. The present
situations of the results of cross section measurements ofCu(p,n) reactions which are often used are shown Fig.2 and Fig. 3
in Appendix.

121

Table 1.

Monitor reaction List used for themeasurement of cross sections of
the reactions useful for medical
use.

Kind of reactions
12

Appendix 7
RIKEN

C(p,pn) 11 C

Al(p,x)7Be
Al(p,x) 22 Na
Al(p,x)2iiNa

Energy region

21-300 GeV
118-800 MeV
540,59382-800540,59370-19063cu(p,n) 63 Zn

3 MeV-11.5 GeV

6^Cu(p,2n) 62 Zn

16-33 MeV

65

Cu(p,n) 65 Zn

3-100
23-102
34.-100

27

Al(d,p* ) 2 %a51V(d,2n)51Cr

11-28
5-90
18

"29

,p

6-29

Fe( 3 He,2n) 57 Ni

6-29

nat Ti (3 He ,x)4 8 V

5-130

56

27

A1( a ,2p)29Al

15-15227

A1( a , 7 B e ) 2 % a40-103

APPENDIX

10l(p,5n)123Xeo0)f Syme et al.
j[ Diksic et al.
{> Paans et al.
I Wilkins et al.

in

\

icr

60

80

100

120

( MeV )
Fig. 1

Calculated (Alice) and experimental excitation functions
127
for proton induced reaction on
I target. Dot-dashedline is CN-theory, and dashed and solid lines are hybrid
model.

APPENDIX
X

000"I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I-i | 1 1 i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i i i | i i i i r i i i i _

c
<V

a
a
<

63

Cu(p,n) 63 Zn

9°

c | 00

I

L.
O

oo
O

jQ

o—
o—

ro

L_

8

o

D

X

10

-

9

I I II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIII

0.0

20.0-

I I I I I I I I I I 1I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1I I I I I I I I I 1

40.0

60.0

ENERGY ( MeV )Fig. 2 The reaction cross sections of 63 Cu(p,n) 63 Zn

80.0

APPENDIX

000 z r ii i i i i i u i ii i ii i i i i I i i i i i i i I i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i L

65

Cu(p,n) 65 Zn

t

c 100
ft

O
J2)

•8
o

- §

£

•

o

o o
9

O

o

10

8

6
t>
0

- 9
o
I I I I I i I i i 1I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i I I I I I i i i i I I 1I I I i I I I I I I I i i I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I i I i I I I I 1

0.0

20.0

40.0

.0

60.0

ENERGY ( MeV )Fig. 3

The reaction cross sections of theCu(p,n)Zn.

125Appendix 8
CNDC

Nuclear Data Activities in China
Cai Dunjiu

Shi Xiangjun* Yuan Hanrong

Chinese Nuclear Data Center P.O.Box 275 (41), Beijing, China
1.

Introduction

In China, the scientific research on nuclear physics started
in the late 1950's. At that time a research reactor and some accelerators were built in the Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing,and some nuclear data measurements were carried out. As to the
nuclear data compilation and evaluation, it started systematicallyjust in 1975, when the Chinese Nuclear Data Center (CNDC) and theChinese Nuclear Data Coordination Network (CNDCN) were set up inorder to meet the requirements of development of nuclear energy,
nuclear science and engineering technology. Since China was non
IAEA member at that time, we could get only very few evaluateddata from abroad publications, we had to do evaluation ourselves
to serve our users, many experimental and theoretical nuclear
scientists were involved in the related work, including developing
theoretical models, writing calculation codes and performing
nuclear data evaluation, etc.
This situation has been changed since the CNDC started tomake contacts with IAEA/NDS, JAERI/NDC and BKL/NNDC in I960.
Especially, since the People's Republic of China became an IAEA
member in 1984, the international cooperation and exchange haveobviously increased between the CNDC and other nuclear data
centres. For example, we have participated in the evaluation andcompilation of neutron data, structure and decay data, fission
product yields and charged particle data under international ccoperation, and some coordinated research programmes under the IAEA
contracts. We have got whole sets of evaluated neutron data of
ENDF/B-4, EHDL, JENDL-2, INDL/V and quite -.a lot of EXFOR experimental data as well as some programmes from IAEA/NDS and OECD/NEA.DB.

126

We
have also sent some neutron data evaluated or measured in
China to IAEA/MDS and several codes to NEA Data Bank. It is clearthat the international cooperation and exchange have promoted thenuclear data activities in China and also become a proper approachfor us to make contributions to the international nuclear data
activities.
Afterwards, according to the needs of nuclear data for both
home and abroad we will do our best in nuclear data activities tomake more contributions.

127

2.

Appendix 8
CNDC

Organizations and Objectives

2.1

Chinese Nuclear Data Center (CNDC)
As mentioned above, the Chinese Nuclear Data Center was
founded in 1975 by the Ministry of Nuclear Industry. At present,
the CNDC has about 30" scientists and a number of support staff ,and is equipped with a PDP 11/70 computer.
The principal task of the CNDC is to function as a national
center for generating, collecting, processing and disseminating
nuclear data, to provide services to all nuclear data users in
China, and to coordinate nuclear data activities on a national
scale.
So far the CNDC's activities have mainly involved the following
respects:
working out a countrywide, long-terra plan on nuclear.data
measurement and evaluation; arranging and coordinating
nuclear data activities of the CNDCN;
studying and developing nuclear data evaluation methods;
coordinating and supervising data evaluators; compilingand evaluating nuclear data;collecting and validating data processing programmes, reports
and recommended data from the network;
maintaining and developing the Chinese Evaluated Nuclear Data
Library (CENDL);
performing benchmark testing of CENDL and generating mtltigroup constants for users;
maintaining the data base of internationally available
nuclear data files; providing selective retrievals and dataprocessing to users;
providing nuclear data and computer program services;publishing nuclear data reports and other publications;128

convening national nuclear data meetings;
coordinating cooperation and exchange in the nuclear data
field with other national and international nuclear data
organizations.
2.2

Chinese Nuclear Data Coordination Network (CNDCN)The CNDCN is composed of the institutes and universities which

are taking up nuclear data measurement and evaluation. It isorganized and coordinated by the CNDC. At present, the network has
about 20 members. The following list shows the main 12 institutionsin the network which have participated in the nuclear data activities for many years.
InstitutionCity

Beijing University

Beijing

Qinghua University

Beijing

Beijing Normal University

3eijing

Sichuan University

ChengduFudan University

Shanghai

Jilin University

ChangchunNankai University

TianjinWuhan University

Wuhan

Lanzhou University

Lanzhou

Institute of Nuclear Research

Shanghai

Institute of Applied Physics
and Computational Mathematics

Beijing

Institute of Atomic Energy

Beijing'29

Appendix 8
CNDC

All the network members undertake their projects according to
the nuclear data plan and their own capacity and conditions under
the guidance of the CNDC. The measured or evaluated data areprovided to the CNDC. Of course, all the members of the CNDCN getsome financial support from the Ministry of Nuclear Industry.
2.3

Working Groups
In order to assist the CNDC in its primary task on a national
scale.,some working groups on the following specialities wereorganized.
Nuclear Data Measurement
Theoretical Calculation of Nuclear Data
Neutron Nuclear Data Evaluation
Tf - Production Data
Construction of Chinese Nuclear Data Library (CENDL)
Group Constant Generation and Benchmark Testing
Nuclear Data processing and computational program
Nuclear Structure and Decay Data
Charged particle Nuclear Data
Fission Product Yi'eld Data—-

Neutron Resonance Parameter and level Density. Atomic and Molecular Data (1986)

The members of these groups come from CNDC and network
institutions.
The function of working groups is as follows :To search the proper way or method to perform the given task;

130

To hold symposiums in order to exchange experiences or discusscommon problems appearing in the activities;
To examine, review and recommend the data from the network.
Z,k China Committee of Nuclear Data CCCND)In order to strengthen the guidance of nuclear data activities
in China, the China Committee of Nuclear Data was established at
the end of 1986.
It is a professional consultative organization under theleadership of the leading body responsible for nuclear data
research work in China.
It attaches importance to the investigation of the urgent
demands for nuclear data in atomic energy, nuclear scienceand nuclear engineering technology development, and to thebetter understanding of the progress and achievements madein the field of international nuclear data activities.
It is responsible for the examination of the nuclear data longterm programme and phase plans, and offers key task project's
and proposals of different kinds to the leading body forconsideration.
It helps the leading body to examine and approve the important progress and achievements made in nuclear data research.
It plays its own role in such fields as external relations,
nuclear technical and academic exchange at home and abroad,and takes vigorous action to promote the mutual relation,intercourse and cooperation with the organizations of thesame occupation, at home and abroad.

131

3.

Appendix 8
CNDC

Progress in nuclear data measurements(This chapter, p. 7-13 and figures on p. 26-39, is omitted from thisreport.
The same
informationiscontained
inthereportINDC(CPR)-11, March 88, containing papers and progress reports
presented at the 16th INDC Meeting, Beijing, 19-23 October 1987.)

i+.

Activities on Nuclear Data Evaluation

4.1

Nuclear Data Evaluation
According to the long-term plan on nuclear data evaluation many
experimenters from the network i n s t i t u t i o n s , such as Sichuan Univers i t y , Qinghua University, Beijing University, Beijing Normal Univers i t y , Lanzhou University and the IAE, have been engaged in thecompilations and evaluations of neutron data for general purpose,
nuclear data for special purposes and the studies on the evaluation
methods.
if.1.1 Neutron Data for general purpose
Up to now, the neutron data including f i l e - 1 to file-5 for 36
nuclides (or elements) have been evaluated in the ENDF/B-4 .format.
All evaluated data make up the f i r s t version of the Chinese .
Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (CENDL-1) and are stored on magnetic
tapes. The evaluated nuclides include H, D, T, ^ )if He, °'?Li, 'Ee,
1O 11
27
' B ,, N,, 0,, 1 9 F ,, 2^Na,, Mg,
g, A1,, 2S i , , V, , Cr, ,2 Fe,, Ni, , Cu, , Zn, Zr, ,z
3 9 2 i 0
Mb, Mo, Sn, Hf, Ta, V/, Au, Pb, z^'^2^]]^and 2 3 9 ' 2 i f 0 P u . The incident
neutron energy range of the evaluated data i s from 10 ^ to 2<10/eV.
The evaluations for some other structural material elements,
such as F, S, Ca, Ti, Mn, Co, Ag, Cd, In and Sb, have also been
finished. The data will be included in the new version of CENDL.
Besides, under the cooperation with a Japanese Scientist a
CNDC':s staff has evaluated the neutron data of 1 0 7 > 1 ° 9 ' N a t Ag ( f i l e
1-5, 13-15) for JENDL-3 at the begirming of 1987 at JAEHI.'
4.1.2 Nuclear Data for Special Purposesa)Charged Particle Nuclear Data (CPND)
The evaluation of the CPND was started in 1975. In 1983, a
CPND group was organized. I t s members are from the IAE, the Ins t i t u t e of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Sichuan
University and the I n s t i t u t e of Nuclear Research in Shanghai. 3yJuly of 1986, t h i s group had collected the measured data for about
16 reactions performed in China and compiled them in the EXFOR
format. The group has also developed a simple program for checking
the EXFOR e n t r i e s . In order to develop international cooperation

132

this group has joined the activities of the IAEA/NDS coordinatednetwork of CPND centres since 1985•b)

Actinide Nuclear Data (AND)Some transplutonium nuclear data had been evaluated and compiled
before 1985 and a report of CNDC-85O12 was published. Since 1985,
the CNDC has participated the IAEA/NDS coordinated research programon the "Validation and Benchmark Testing of Actinide Nuclear Data".
The neutron data evaluation for n 7 Bk and ^"7Cf have been finished.
The evaluation of the neutron capture cross sections of ^ Am isbeing undertaken.
c) Fission Product Yield Data (FPYD)
A group at IAE is engaged in FPYD measurement and evaluation.
Before 1981 , three versions of "Evaluated Fission-Product Yield"
had been issued.
On the basis of IAEA/NDS' suggestion, this group has continued
to develop the Rider and Crouch FPYD libraries, abiding by the
IAEA/NDS suggestions to issue a compilation of recommended values
similar to the well-known Meek and Rider file at regular intervals.
Since 1985> this group has been devoting itself to the projectof setting up a fission product yield library. In the first phaseof the project, top priority was given to the following 10 fission
systems: U235T, U235F, U235HE, U238F, U238HE, Pu239T, Pu239F,
Pu2MT, U233T, Th232F.
Up to now, the 10 sets of fission yield data evaluation arecompleted. The recommended values have been edited in the ENDF/B-5
format and in a "people-readable" format. The first set of recommended FPYD values has been transmitted to the IAEA/NDS.
The recommended values of the thermal fission of 2 " u and 2 ^ P uhave been tested and compared with ENDF/B-VE by Dr. T. R. England(LASL) through calculating the decay powers. The results are
satisfactory.
d)

Nuclear Structure and Decay Data (NSDD)
Initiated by the visit of Dr. S. Pearlstein, Director of the
Brookhaven National Nuclear Data Center, USA, in 1981, the CNDC
has participated in the international effort on MSDD evaluation.

133

Appendix 8
CNDC

Accordingly, ten mass chains were permanently assigned to China(A=51-%, 195-198). The Chinese NSDD evaluation group was formed
in 1983 and the members are from IAE, Jilin University, Changchun,and the Institute of Nuclear Research in Shanghai.
Up to now, the evaluation for mass chains of A=51, 54, 55, 56,
170, 172 hasbeen finished and published with the help of the
NNDC; work on the evaluation of mass chains of A=52, 195 and 196 isin progress.
4.1.3 Evaluation Methods
To improve evaluation, some evaluation methods have beendeveloped or are being developed, such asa) Data processing methods
Curve fitting:a spline fitting program for multi-sets of data
has been written, with which the knots can be optimized andspline order number can be chosen;••"Union adjusting" (to make a l l cross sections consistence for
one nuclide or material):
single energy point union adjusting based on Bayes principle;
spline fitting for multi-curves;
Simultaneous evaluation for several nuclides (materials) basedon spline fitting for multi-curves.

b)

Covariance processing methods
Calculation of covaridnce matrix for experimental data using
the information about errors in experiments given by authors.
The program is codding;
Covariance propagation in data evaluation processing, including
curve fitting, union adjusting. The programs have been finished. Some primary results have been got. Now the programsare. being improved and will be used in more realistic case;
Simplification of the methods to deal with experimental "datawith covariance. Some primary results have been got;

134

Calculation of covariance matrix between different nuclides(which are relative to each other in experimental measurements).
The study in physics has been finished. The program is writting.
In fact, our efforts in this field have been made for years.
But so far only some primary results have been got, we still havea lot of work to do and a long way to go.
c)Systematics Studies

Systematics studies on the excitation functions of the (n,2n),(n,3n) as well as (n,x) (x=p,d,t and ^»Sle) reactions have been
performed. The parameterized formulae and all the parameters
related have been obtained on the basis of the evaporation modelwith preequilibrium mechanism and the collected data for &.-25-2.QQ
in the neutron energy range of from threshold to 25 MeV.
With the formulae and parameters, the excitation function could
be predicted more reliably than before for the energy regions or
nuclides not measured heretofore.
Recently, the systematics study on the (n,Y) reaction crosssections has also been performed.
k»2. Theory Research and Nuclear Data Calculation
As we know, in nuclear data evaluation the theoretical calculation plays an important role. Since the CNDCN was formed many
theorists in the CNDCN have been engaged in the study of applicationsof various kinds of nuclear reaction theories and models, developing computer codes and performing theoretical calculations of
nuclear data.

Appendix 8
CNDC

135

The main theories and methods applied for calculations ofneutron nuclear data are shown in the following list :TargetTheoryInstitution

Phase Shift Analysis

H> D

Fudan Univ.

Faddeev Equation

D\, 3HeCNDC

R-Matrix Theory
Optical Model
Hauser-Feshbach Theory
DWBA

6

Li, 7Li

Jilin

Quasifree Scattering

9Be

Inst. of Appl. Phys.
and Compu. Math.

Optical Model
Hauser-Feshbach Theory
with WFC
Evaporation Model
Freequilibrium Exciton Model
DWBA
Couple Channel Calculation

structuralandfissionable
nuclei

CNDC
Nankai Univ.

Resonance Group Theory

Inst. of Nucl. Resea
Univ.

Wuhan Univ.
Beijing Univ.

In statistical theory calculations, the calculated results arevery sensitive to the level density and its parameters, so thatsome-efforts were made in this field and a new set of level density
parameters in the Gilbert-Cameron formula has been gained based on
more accurate data which were obtained in recent years.
To improve the agreement between calculated results and experimental data of double differential cross sections the effects of
the Fermi Motion and the Pauli Principle were first taken into
account in the exciton model by our theorists. This physical136

consj.deration has oeen accepted by some colleagues in the world.
At present, an unified preequilibrium and equilibrium modelwith conservation of angular momentum is being developed under an
IAEA contract.
Apart from these, some studies on underlying theory have also
been carried out in the CNDCN. For instance, some encouraging
results have been reached in the study on the microscopic theoryof the nuclear optical potential and the study on the fission
mechanism. The study on new sets of nucleon-nucleon interactionof rank-1 and rank-2 separable types through fitting £-body and3-body data is in progress in order to improve calculations of
few-body reaction data.
On the basis of theory research mentioned above many computercodes for data calculations have been developed. Three of them
have been sent to NEA Data Bank. Now some important codes arebeing revised or standardized.

137

Z4..3

Appendix 8
CNDC

Multigroup Constant Generation and Benchmark Testing of

Nuclear Data
A group responsible for the generation of multi-group constants
and benchmark testing of nuclear data was formed in 1976. Since
then, the main efforts of this group have been made in developing
computer programmes.
Up to now, the group has developed or implemented the following
programs for multigroup cross section generation:
RQCS, a program to calculate multigroup constants for thermal
fission reactors. It generates group constants for MUFT and
GAM. (1980)
K3CS, a fast reactor raultigrcup constant program based on the
Bondarenko method which adjusts group constants to temperatureand composition of the reactor. (1982)
NGCPS, a group constant generation system for fast reactor
and shielding calculation;
LEK, a format transform program to match the ENDF/B-if data
file with the KQCS program;
AMPX-2, a large modular nuclear data processing program, which
was obtained from ORNL/RSIC. It has been implemented on theIBM-3031 computer (1986);
NJOY, another large mo'dular nuclear data processing program,which was obtained from NESC at ANL(USA). It has been
implemented on the CYBER 170/825 at the IAE(1986).
With these programs the CNDC can provide various types of
input data for nuclear power reactor design calculations andshielding analysis. The calculations of multigroup crosssections for nuclear power reactor, fast reactor and fusion
research already started.
As to the benchmark testing, the following programs have been
written or implemented:

138

FEONAN, which calculates the uncollided transmitted neutron
spectra and checks total cross sections using the Broomstick
experiments performed at ORNL/RSIC;
NDP, one-dimensional diffusion program. It calculates effective
multiplication factors, spectrum indexes, and criticaldimensions for reactors;
TDBDC, two-dimensional diffusion and burnup program, which canbe used for fast reactor analysis;
PETRC, a pertubation reactivity coefficient program, whichcalculates one-dimensional or two-dimentional systems;
DTF^-C, one-dimensional discrete ordinate Sn program, which isa version of the US DTF4 program;
ONEDANT, one-dimensional discrete ordinate 3n program, whichuses the Synthetic Diffusion Method (SDK) allowing foreffective accelerated convergence (1986).
Using these programs, the benchmark testing of the CEKDL-1 is
expected to be finished in the near future.
The checks of total cross sections for Fe, 0, Na and M elementsof CENDL-1
have been performed.
k»k

Nuclear Data and Program Library

In the CNDC there is. a library group, which is responsible forthe nuclear data library and the associated computer program library.
At present the group has the following main tasks:
to prepare and maintain the Chinese Nuclear Data Library (bENDL).
to collect evaluated nuclear data .and computer programs
prepared by other centers;
to improve or develop the library management program system,
data computer programs and evaluation system; to make complete

139

Appendix 8
CNDC

evaluations of specific nuclides;
to collect, compile and evaluate A+M data and establish, an
A+M data library under cooperation with the A+M data working
group;
to issue nuclear data publications;to provide nuclear data and program services to Chinese users
and exchange them with IAEA/NDS and other centers;
to operate, maintain and manage the computer PDF 11/70.

140

5.

Development for future

As far as the nuclear data activities in China in future isconcerned, the first important objective is still to satisfy therequirement of the development of nuclear energy as well as theapplication of nuclear technology in our country.
As a matter of fact, in the early 1970's our country had aresearch project on fast breeder reactor and fusion research.
However, the project was not made an expected progress for somereasons. Recently the fast reactor and fusion research project has
been resumed and reinforced, and a plan for developing hybrid
reactor has also been worked out.
In order to meet the needs of nuclear data and A+M data for theplans mentioned above, the nuclear data activities must be further
developed in our country. Under the CCND's suggestion, the future
project of the CNDC's activities is mainly as follows:a) to update the evaluated neutron data library for general
purpose. CSNDL-2 is planed to be finished" in 1990 through;reevaluating some important nuclides,
adding some other selected nuclides after analysing andreviewing the existing evaluations made by other centres, etc;b) to extend the evaluation of nuclear data for special purposes,
such as charged particle nuclear data, neutron dosimetry andactivation reaction data;c) to collect and compile A+M data and build up a corresponding
A + r.' data library. The first step is to collect and compile theexisting bibliographic and numerical data as well as calculate andmeasure some of A+M data;d) to make benchmark testing on some important evaluated nuclear
data;
e)

to improve and complete theoretical calculation codes,

141

Appendix 8
CNDC

evaluation and data processing systems to improve the quality ofevaluated data.
Apart from these, our center and network would like to developinternational cooperation and exchange activities more actively.
At present we are participating in some CPP activities as mentioned
at the beginning.It is expected that we shall make more contributions to the existing and new CRP activities. On the other hand,
we wish to strengthen bilateral cooperations with other centres orforeign institutions. It is planned to evaluate neutron data of
0 and F elements for ENDF/B-6 under the cooperation between the
CNDC and the NNDC (actually, the LASL and ORNL). We are sure that
this kind of cooperation activities is profitable for both participating sides.
Finally, on behalf of the CNDC we wish to take this opportunity
to express our gratitude to IAEA and other centers aa well as all
old and new foreign friends for their contributions to promote
their cooperations with the CNDC in nuclear data activities.

Table 1.

Unit

IAE

I n s t i t u t e of Nuclear Scienceand Technology of Sichuan
University

Peking University

Main Facilities

600KV Cockcroft-Walton(200-^00KV)
Z.b KV Van de Graaff (0.3-2.5MV)
HI-13 Tandem(KVEC,3-13Mv|+1 KV,provide
heavy ion)~,.
_
Heavy Water Reactor (15MW, 2.8X10 4n/sec,cmc)
SwimminB P o °l Reactor (i»000 KW)
Cockcroft-Walton UOOKV; 2OOKV,~5ns)
2.5MV Van de Graaff (~lns)
Cyclotron (+1.2M, Ea~12MeV).5W VDG (1-2ns,0.3-^.5MV,provide p,d,(Xr- Ar,will be operated in I988)
Tandem 2X7MV (EN-18, 0.5-6.5MV,will be operated
in 1988)

2W-7HV (NEC, 5SDH-2)
linghua University
Beijing Normal University
I n s t i t u t e of Nuclear
Research i n Shanghai
Fudan University

Research Subjects

Fission Process study
Fast neutron spectroscopy
Fast neutron reaction
Nuclear structure and decay
Light and heavy ion nuclear
reaction
A+M
Application of n u c l e a r technique

Fast neutron scat, angular distr.
Neutron capture Y-ray
Charged particle reaction, A+M
Nuclear r e a c t i o n & nuclear
structure
Nuclear fission
Material Science,Atomic collisioi
Heavy ion reaction

200KV Cockcroft-WaTton
Fast neutron scat. & reactions
Fast neutron spectr»&*y productioii»OOKVC-W with post helix a c c e l e r a t i o nApplication of nuclear techniquek
VDG(NEC, p p O f .
)Tandem 2X6MV(indigenously designed, under conIn-beam T-spectroscopy
struts t i on)
Light ion & charged p a r t i c l e
AVF Cyclotron (<pl.2M, Ep~3-3OMeV, d,«,-heavy i o n ) nuclear r e a c t i o nApplication of Nuclear technique
2.5 MV VDG
Fastneutron r e a c t i o nTandem 2X3 MV (NEC, i s being i n s t a l l e d )143Appendix 9
EXFOR errors
Working paper WP3

Summary of important errors found by NDS in
EXFOR TRANS tapes

0. Schwerer

use of modifier MSC forphotonuclear data) (Area 1)

neutron

data

(may

be

used

only

for

errors given in BIB section under ERR-ANALYS not consistent withthose used in DATA section, or errors given under ERR-ANALYS in
subentry 1 not used in all subentries (Area 2)
heading ANG used for other angles than that of the outgoing particle,
or for data which, according to the REACTION given, do not depend on
angle of outgoing particle. (Implicit rule: ANG and its derivatives
may be given only if DA or COR appears in REACTION SF6.) (Areas 2,4)
(e.g. 22011, 22028, 40916)
E-format numericalsection (Area 2)

data

not

right-adjusted

within

field

in

DATA

use of obsolete REACTION codes PAR.DE and PAR'SPC (Area 4)
incorrect or missing alter flags in col. 80 (Area 2)
giving quantities under MONITOR which are not proportional to thedata (ASSUMED should be used instead) (e.g. 40729, 40850, 13104.003,4)
giving EN if SF2=0, or giving EN twice (Area 2)

Appendix 10
CP col Lections
SUMMARY OF CHARGED PARTICLE DATA COLLECTIONS
C. L. DDNFORD
NATIONAL NUCLEAR DATA CENTER
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORYUPTON, NEW YORK, DSA
February 27, 1986

A.

Bibliography

The oldest and most comprehensive charged particle bibliography wasproduced at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) by HcGowan and Milner(1).
This bibliography covered the literature on charged particle reactions
for all projectiles and targets without restriction on incident energy.
Noreactions involving mesons were included.
This project was terminated in
1976.
At the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), a specialized
bibliography devoted to information on interaction of light charged particle
reactions of interest to fusion, is currently being maintained (2). Thisbibliography is limited to targets Z <8 and A < 1 6 , projectiles Z <2 and A <4and energies up to 20 MeV.
This bibliography is historically complete.
Of
more recent vintage, is a bibliography for charged particle interactions inwhich the compound nucleus mass is either 7 or 11 (3). The energy range islimited to below 20 MeV.
The bibliography is maintained as part of the Los
Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) program to evaluate the "Li (n,a ) andthe 10 B(n,a) neutron standard cross sections. Presently, the two data bases
exist in a merged form at LANL.
In 1976, National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC) at Brookhaven undertook thecompilation of an integral charged particle bibliography restricted toexcitation functions and thick target yields as a part of the newly formedinternational compilation activity for this kind of data (4).
The NNDC
compilation was published in a "CINDA-like" format with coverage beginningwith the end of the ORNL bibliographic activity.
This compilation was
terminated in 1982. Specialized bibliographies covering the same information
are now extracted from the Nuclear Structure References data base andpublished annually (5).
A compilation of references to charged particle reaction data covering
incident particles with masses between proton and 'Id. producing any particle(except meson) or gamma rays is being completed at LANL (6). The compilation
will cover both experimental and theoretical papers from 1947 to date covering
the incident particle energy range between 50 and 1000 MeV. The information
was extracted from the RECON system (INIS equivalent) and is not incomputerized form.
Included are some examples of currently available publications. Figure 1
shows a sample page from the Reaction Index in the Recent References
publication (7). Figure 2 shows a sample page from the residual nucleus index
of the Bibliography of Integral Charged Particle Nuclear Data (5).

146

B.

Experimental Data

The numerical data covered in the LLNL and LANL bibliographies are alsoavailable in computerized fora (2,3).
The ORNL group also compiled
experimental data but only for selected nuclides which were included in curvebook publications (8).
This data base presently is available from NNDC.
Charged Particle barn books for elements from Hydrogen to Chromium were
published by LANL (12).
The international charged particle effort was started in 1976 to compile
excitation function and thick target yield data.
The EXFOR format was
selected.
All data compiled by this network Is available in the EXFOR
format. The major contribution to this compilation activity was the Karlsruhe
Charged Particle Data Group (9). Host of the data of interest in the ORNL
compilation has been converted to EXFOR by the group.
Unfortunately, thisgroup was disbanded in 1983.
At irregular intervals, compilations of selected charged particle
experimental data with eyeguides have been published.
These are generallyindexed in the introduction to the annual charged particle bibliographies
publication by NNDC (5).
The major charged particle data compilation activity is now centered at
Kurchatov Institute in Moscow.
Originally, this group was established tocompile all charged particle data produced in the USSR.
Now, the group iscompiling some of the data previously compiled at Karlsruhe. A new group at
RIKEN Institute of Physics and Chemical Research, Saitama, Japan has joined
the compilation activity.
They are compiling data for about 20 isotope
production reactions in the EXFOR format.
In figure 3, is a sample portion of the index to available experimental
charged particle data compiled in the EXFOR format. CSISRS (Cross Section
Information Storage and Retrieval System) is the NNDC data base containing
data compiled in the EXFOR format. The initial letter of the accession number
indicated the data center which compiled the data.
Table I explains thesecodes. At present, the library contains 51,365 data points in 2850 data setswith projectiles from protons to Xe-136, targets from deuterium to Cf-249 andincident energies up to 300 GeV.
TABLE I
Charged Particle Compilation Center Codes

A
B
C
D
R

CAJAD
KACHAPAG
NNDC

NDS
RIKEN
CNDC

Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, USSR
Kernforschungszentrum, Karlsruhe, FRG
Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA
Nuclear Data Section, IAEA, Vienna
Institute of Physics & Chemical Research,
Saitama, Japan
Chinese Nuclear Data Center, Beijing, PRC

147
C.

Appendix 10
CP collections

Evaluated Data

Charged particle data evaluations are performed at LLNL and LANL for thedata contained in their bibliographies (.3, 10). The LANL evaluations include
covariance matrices. There is also an evaluation of (p,n), (p,2n) and (p,3n)reactions for 306 nuclides from Z-21 to Z«83 by Pearlstein (11) based on
systematics. These data are available in ENDF-5 format. Some evaluation work
is also done at Kurchatov and RIKEN.
Charged particle reaction data for several materials including C, Al,
structural materials, W, Ta and U, are being produced from nuclear model codes
for incident protons up to 100 MeV by LANL (6). These data will probably beavailable in ENDF-6 format.
At NNDC, S. Pearlstein is investigating thesystematics from high energy proton bombardment.
Extensive effort has gone into modifying the ENDF format to make it
useful for storage of evaluated charged particle reaction data. ENDF-6 format
is available and documented with all of the utility codes upgraded to handle
the format. It is strongly recommended that this format be used for exchangeof evaluated data.

148
REFERENCES

1.

F. K. McGowan and W. T. Milner.
"Reaction List for Charged-ParticleInduced Reactions." Atomic Data Nuclear Data Reprints 2, Academic Press,
NY (1974).
Nuclear Data Tables All, 1. Academic Press (1972).
Atomic Data Nuclear Data Tables JL2_, 499. Academic Press, NY (1573).
Atomic Data Nuclear Data Tables L5_, 189. Academic Press, NY (1975).
Atomic Data Nuclear Data Tables 1£_, 1.
Academic Press, NY (1976).

2.

S. T. Perkins, A. M. Hanson and R. J. Howerton, "A Bibliography and Index
for Nuclear Reactions Among Light Charged Particles", UCRL-50400 Vol. 26(1984).
,~~

3.

G. Hale et. al. private communication, 1986.

4.

N. E. Holden and T. W. Burrows. "The Bibliography of Integral Charged
Particle Nuclear Data." BNL-NCS-50640 (1982). Fourth Edition, Supplement 2.
T. W. Burrows and G. Wyant. "The Bibliography of Integral Charged Particle
Nuclear Data." BNL-NCS-50640 (1981). Fourth Edition, Supplement 1.
T. W. Burrows and P. Dempsey. "TheParticle Nuclear Data." BNL-NCS-50640
Edition).

Bibliography of Integral Charged(1980). Fourth Edition, (Archival

5.

N. E. Holden, S. Raraavatarara and C. L. Dunford. "Charged Particle Nuclear
Data Bibliography", BNL-NCS-51771 (1984), Supplement 1 (1985).

6.

E. Arthur et. al., private communication, 1986.

7.

S. Ramavataratn. "1985 Recent Reference (Cumulation)". Nuclear Data Sheets
47_, 541. Academic Press (1986).

8.

F. K. McGowan, et al. "Nuclear Cross Sections for Charged-Particle Induced
Reactions Mn, Fe, Co. ORNL-CPX-1 (1964).
Nuclear Cross Sections
ORNL-CPX-2 (1964).

forCharged-Particle

InducedReactions

Ni, Cu.

9.

H. Muenzel, et al. "Karlsruhe Charged Particle Reaction Data Compilation".
Physik Daten 15-Index (1979).
Physik Daten 15-1 (1979).
Physik Daten 15-2 (1979).
Physik Daten 15-3 (1982).
Physik Daten 15-4 (1982).
Physik Daten 15-5 (1982).

10.

S. T. Perkins and D. E. Cullen. "Experimental and Evaluated Nuclear PlusInterference Cross Sections for Light Charged Particles." Nucl. Sci
22.(1), 20 (1981).
Ibid. UCRL-50400 Vol. 15, Pt. F.

149

Appendix 10
CP collections

REFERENCES (Cont'd)

11.

S. Pearlstein. "Starter Evaluated
19148 (1974).

Charged Particle Data Library." BNL-

12.

Ni J a m i e and J. D. Seagrave. "Charged Particle Cross Sections." LA-2014(1956).
D. B. Smith, N. Jarmie and J. D. Seagrave. "Charged
Sections, Neon-Chromium." LA-2424 (1961).

Particle

Cross

150
FIGURE 1 - SAMPLE PAGE FROM RECENT REFERENCES ( 7 )REACTION(p.xn)

INDEX

continued"Cu(p.xn),E = 26.7 MeV: measured o~<E<n).8).
"8r(p.xn).E*threshoid-92 MeV: measured residuals"Br(p.xnl.E»threshold-S2 MeV; measured residuals"Rb(p.xn).E>threshold-32 Me": measured residuals* ? Rb(p.xn).E«lhreshold-S2 MeV: measured residuals•*Y(p,xn).E«25 MeV: measured inclusive e(En.«n).
"Zr(p.xn>.£«23 MeV: measured inclusive <r(En.8n)"Zrlp.xn).E*i8 MeV; measured inclusive u(En.an).
"Zr(p.xn),E=2S MeV: measured inclusive o-(En.$n).

"Motp.xnl.E'ZS MeV: measured inclusive <7(En.8n)10oMo(p.xn).E = 2S MeV; measured inclusive <r(En.0n).
"°Pd(p.xn).E»2S MeV; measured inclusive <r(En.9n).
'"l(p.xn).E>threshold-S2 MeV: measured residuals'"Cs(p.xn).£»threshold-5a MeV: measured residuals'"Ba(p.xn).E-32-4S MeV: measured £•>.!•>.l7<E).
'"Ba(p.xn).E*17-4S MeV; measured E7.I7.I7CE).
"*Tb(p,xn).E»2S MeV: measured inclusive <r(En.0n).

84Sc33
84Sc33
84Sc33
85Sa23
88Sa23
8SM0OI
8SM0OI
84Sc33(p.xntr")lot

Bi(p.ir'xn).E»120-800 MeV: measured

residuals

85Dolt(p.xnp)

T*Br(p.xnp).E<*threshold-S2 MeV: measured residuals"Br(p.xnp).E = threshold-S2 MeV; measured residuals"Rb(p.xnp).E*lhreshold-32 MeV: measured residuals"Rb<p.xnp).E=threshold-S2 MeV: measured residuals'"I(p.xnp).E=«lhreshold-52 MeV: measured residuals'"Cs(p.xnp),E-threshold-52 MeV: measured

85Sa23(p.xnyp)V(p.xnyp).E = 45-300 MeV: measured <7<E>.
"Mn(p.xnyp).E*43-200 MeV: measured <r(E).

1 14"Co(p.xnyp).E»4S-200 MeV; measured oiE).

SSMi 14

I09
TI(p.F).E<24-41 MeV: measured fission frajment"«Pb(p.F).E = 24-41 MeV; measured fission frafment"*Pb(p.F).E-24-41 MeV: measured fission frajment
J<"Pb(p.FI.E»24-4l MeV: measured fission fra(ment("»Bi(p.F).E»40-70 MeV; measured fission «r(E).
""Bi(p.F).E«24-4l MeV: measured fission fra(mentI3>
Th(p.F).E-l CeV: measured fission fraiment mean"'l'( p.F).£=l CeV: measured fission frajment mean

85!tOl85 1(0185 1 tOl
851 tOl
841(01
BSItOl8SChl483Chl4(p.F)
lll

Cs(p.F).E = 200 MeV; measured cumulative fusion
1S0
Sm(p.F).E«l CeV: measured fission fragmentli4
W(p.r).E*l CeV: measured fission frajment mean
13
' Re(p.F),E = 40-70 MeV: measured fission a(E).
la>Au(p.F).E>40-70 MeV: measured fission <r(E>.
'•'Au(p.r).Ea| CeV; measured fission frajmenl meanz0)
TI(p.p).E = 24-41 MeV; measured fission fraiment*"TI(p.F).E = 40-70 MeV; measured fission cr(E)8SWalS
84Ch36
8SChl484 1(01
84 1(01
85Chl4851 tOl84 1(01(p.nFl*"U(p.nF).E=l2.7-25.5 MeV. measured"•U(p.nF>.£M2.7-2S.S MeV. measured

2;

82PI08
82PI08"l(p.nF).E = l

MeV. measured

ezptoe(p.X)'Hlp.XVE-lSO MeV. measured rra(ment spectra for'H(p.XI.E=150 MeV. measured fratment spectra for*H(p.X).E at 2.06-3 67 C * V c measured a*Be(p.X).E'IS0 MeV: measured fra(ment spectra Tor"C(p.X).E*ISO MeV; measured fraiment spectra forNe(p.X).E = 40 MeV: measured residuals yields.
*°Ar(p.X).EM CeV: measured fast particle meanCu(p.X).E*4-33 MeV. measured residual production
A(lp.X).E*l CeV: measured inclusive (raimentCdlp.XI.E-0.3-3 MeV: measured L-subshell X-ray
Sb(p.X).E-03-Z MeV. measured L-subshell X-ray
Te(p.X).E*O.3-2 MeV: measured L-subshell X-ray
Oy(p.X).E-l-3 MeV: measured I X-rays
Dy<p.X).E»l-3 MeV; measured E(L X-rayl.UI X-rayl
Yb(p.X).E=l-3 MeV: measured E(L X-ray).l(l X-rayl
W(p.X).E-l-3 MeV; measured L X-rays

8SSo0983CO25"C(p.ir-X).E = 330.400.500 MeV; measured ff<8) vsBSDiOlW(p.X).E»l-3 MeV: measured E(L X-ray).l(l X-ray)
Au<p.X).E>l-3 MeV: measured L X-rays.
" ' A u l p . X I . E ' 0 2 - 0 9 MeV.. nucleon: measured
Pb(p.X).E«l-3 MeV. measured L X-rays.
Pb(p.X).E-20 MeV: measured residual isomerPt>(p.X).E-0.2-0.9 MeV, nucleon: measured absolute L
Pb<p.X).E»l-3 MeV. measured E(L X-ray).Id X-ray)"*Bi(p.X).E«l-3 MeV. measured E(L X-ray).
TMp.XJ.E-1-3 MeV. measured L X-rays.
Th(p.X).E*600 MeV: measured Rn isotope production
Th(p.X).E = l - 3 MeV: measured E(L X-ray).l(l X-ray)
L(p.X).E-l-3 MeV: measured L X-rays.
L'(p.X).E»0 2 - 0 S MeV/nucleon: measured absolute L
L(p.X).E-l-3 MeV. measured E(L X-ray).1(1 X-ray).
1J>t;(p.X).E-600 MeV; measured >-.X-ray spectra.

85SO09*U(p.fr-X).E>330.... MeV; measured a{») vs pion

8SD1OI*"l'(p.»*X).E»330.... MeV; measured »(») vs pion

85DiQl(P.X--X)"C(p.7r*X).E>330.400.S00 MeV: measured (7(9) vs

8SO1O1660

IS]

Appendix 10
CP collections

FIGURE 2 - SAMPLE PAGE FROM CHARGEL .ARTICLE BIBLIOGRAPHY (5)RESIDUAL INDEXRESIDUALTARGET-REACTION

INCIDENT ENERGYREFERENCE

KEY

NUMBER•«Nb•*Zr(p.n)"Zr(p.n)E=22 MeV
E=22 MeVJOUR Yad.Fiz. 39. 264
JOUR Yid.Fiz. 39. 264

84ZhO2
84ZhO2"Nb•*Zr(d.n)E = 4 - 1 2 MeVJOUR Al.Enerf. S3. 164

83Va33"Nb"Zr(p.n)"Zr(p.n)**Zr(d.2n)

E=I6 MeV
E*l. 3 - 5 . 1 MeV
E ' 4 - 1 2 MeVJOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123, 972
JOUR Nucl.Phys. A430. 301
JOUR At.Enert- S3. 164

84A00584Kel2
S3Va33"Nb"Zr(d.n)E = 4 - 1 2 MeVJOUR At.Enert. S3. 164

83Va33"Mo"Mo(*°Ne."Ne)

E-146

JOUR Z.Phys. A317. 31

84Nal2"Mo

Ni(p,7)
Ti(p.n)Cr(p.n)Fe(p.n)Ni(p.n)Cu(p.n)Zn(p.n)G*(p.n)Ge(p.n)"As(p.n)Se(p.n)Zr(p.n)M
Nb(p.n)"Nb(p.n)Mo(p.n)Cd(p.n)Sn(p.n)Sb(p.n)Te(p.n)•°Zr(a.n)

E-tO 4 MeV
E = 10 .4 MeV
E=10 4 MeV
E = 10 .4 MeV
E = 10 4 MeV

4 MeV
4 MeV
E=10. 4 MeV
E=»10 4 MeV
E = 10 4 MeV
E = 10 4 MeV£=10 4 MeV
E=J6 MeV
E=10 4 MeV
E=IO 4 MeV
E=IO. 4 MeV
E=IO. 4 MeV
E=10. 4 MeV
E = 10. 4 MeV
E = 30 MeV
E=3O MeVJOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioarial.N'ucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82, 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chent. 82, 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 135
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 135
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 135
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 133
JOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
JOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972

84130184)90184130184130184130184(30184130184)30184130184)30184)301841301
84AbO584130184130184ls0184ls01
84!s0184ls01
84AbO584AbO5

E=30 MeVJOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972

84AbO591

MeV

Zr(a.2n)••Mo"Zr(a.n)l00

E=146 MeVJOUR Z.Phys. A317, 31

84Nal2"Tc>00Mo("Ne."Ne)»4Mo(p.2n)»*Mo(d.n)E-=30 MeV
E=4-12 MeVJOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
JOUR At.Enert. 55. 164

84AbOS
83Va33••Tc»4Mo(p.n)"Mo(p.2n)»*Mo(d.2n)"Mo(a,np)

E=16 MeV
E=30 MeV£=•4-12 MeV
E=30 MeV

JOUR
JOUR
JOUR
JOUR

J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
At.Enert 55. 164
J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972

84AbO584AbO383Va33
84AbOS"Tc"Mo(p.n)"Mo(p.2n)f<
Mo<d.n)"Mo(d.2n)«Nb<a.2n)• J Nb(a.2n)

E = l0.4 MeV
E=16 MeV
E=30 MeV
E=4-12 MeV£=4-12 MeV
E=30 MeV
E-threshold-140 MeVJOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 135
JOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
JOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
JOUR Al.Enert. 55. 164
JOUR At.Enert- 55, 164
JOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
JOUR Nuovo Cim. 81. 66

841301
84AbO584AbO383Va3383Va33
84AbO584Ga20"Tc"Mo(p.n)• ? Mo(p.2n)"Mo(d.n)"Mo(d.2n)"Nb(a.n)"Nb(a.n)"Nb(a.n)E»16 MeV
E=30 MeV
E*4-12 MeV
E=4-12 MeV
E=30 MeV
E>40-140 MeV
E=33 MeVJOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
JOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
JOUR Al.Enert- 55. 164
JOUR At.Enert. 53. 164
JOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 972
JOUR Nuovo Cim. 81. 66
JOUR J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 82. 61

84AbO584AbO583Va3383Va33
84AbO5
84Ca20840m0ll00

E=30 MeV
E*4-I2 MeV
E=I8-25 MeVJOUR J.Nucl.Mater. 122/123. 9 7 2
JOUR Al.Enert. **• 164 *JOUR Phys.Rev. C31. 409

84AbO583V.33
8SKaO2

Mo"Tc

Mo(p.2n)"Mo(d.n)»«Zr(«Li.3n)

CSISRS R e f e r e n c e s

Reaction- CHARGED PARTICLESr

Sorted by Accesr.~~Subacctss.l

E n e r g y (eV)ainmarInstituteI27-Feb-86

R e f erenee

pts

2
2
2
2

2SYTYUR
2SYTMUR
2SYTYUR2SYTUUR
1 ZSMTYUP
2 2SUIYUR
2 ZSdfMUR
2 ZSYTMUR
2 2SUTMUR
2 ZSYTYUR
2 2SYTYUR
2 ZSYfMUR
2 2SYTYUR
2 ZSYTYUR
2 2SYTMUR
2 2SMTWRz ~suruu~
2 2SMTYUR

2 2SYTYUR
2 ZSYTMUA
2 2SUJWUR
1 8 3ARGCNE
1 8 3ARCCNE
45 3ARSCHE
45 3AR6CNE
4 5 3AR6CWE
2 9 3bRGCNE
2 9 3AR6CNE
l a 3rrrccnE
4'5 3ARGCNE
45 3AR6CWE
s 4c c PUZB
1 8 2FR PAR
1 9 2FA PAR
1 9 2FR PAR
2 0 2FR PAR
1 5 2FR PAR
1 6 2FR PAR
1 4tCPtEt
1 lUSACAR
l o ICANlCC
1 lUSACAR
1 lUSACAR
11 lCANHCG
9 lCANllCG
1 4CCPRI
7 1CANIIC6
9 iCAYRC6
9 1CANRCC
6 1CANHCPYr6RUET TER
urcauEnER
Yr6RUETTERYrGRUET 1ER
Ur GRUET TERY#GRUETTERUr GRUETTER
Yr6RUETt ER
Ur6RUETT ERYrGRUETTERYrGRUETTERYrGRUETTERMr6RUEFTER
Yr6RUETTER
Yr6RUETTERYrGRUETTERYrGRUET T ERUrGRUEtTERYr6RUETTER
Yr6RUETfERYIGRUET~ERJrJRCr67r165
J1JRCr67s165
JrJRCr67r165
JrJRCr67r165
JrJRCr67rl65
JrJAC167rl65
JrJRCr67r165
JrJRCr67rl65
J*JRts67r165
JrJRCr67r165
JrAEr491I2)rlOl
JrNPIAr297r61
JrNP/A~297r69
JrNPlAr297.61
JrNPIArZ97r61
JrNPIAr297r61
JrNPIAr297r61
C88OKIEVr 2 1 3 0
JrPRr178sl732
JrPR/Crlbr64
JrPRr178r1732
JrPRr178r1732
JrPRJCr14164
JrPRltrl4r64
JrYFs24r1177
JrPRJCrlbr64
JrPRIc114164
JrPRICrlbrb4
JrPRIt.lbr64

Flrrt
AuthorA C C ~ S S ~ O ~#8202. A.CRUETTER
00029 1 9
8 2 0 2 A-6RUETTER
DO029 1 8
8 2 0 2 A.CRUETTER
DO029 1 7
8 2 0 2 AoSRUETTER
DO029 1 6
8 2 0 2 A.6RUETTER
DO029 1 5
8 2 0 2 A-6RUETTER
DDO29 1 4
8 2 0 2 A-GRUETTER
DO029 1 3
8 2 0 2 A-CRUETTLR
DO029 1 2
8 2 0 2 A.6RUEffER
DO029 11
8 2 0 2 A-CRUETTER
DO029 11
8 2 0 2 A-6RUETTER
DO029 11
8 2 0 2 A.~RUETTER
DO029 1 0
8 2 0 2 A-CIUETFER
DO029 98 2 0 2 A-6RUEtTEU
DO029 88 2 0 2 A-CRUETTER
DO029 88 2 0 2 A-6RUETTER
DO029 7
8 2 0 2 A.6RUETTER
DO029 700029 6
8 2 0 2 Ao6RUETTER
8 2 0 2 A-SRUETTER
DO029 6
8 2 0 2 A-6UUETFER
DO029 6
8 2 0 2 A-CRUET TER
DO029 S81
H-OE LA VEfiA VEDO 0 0 0 4 3 581
I - D E LA VE6A VEDO DO045 3
81
H.OE LA VECA VEDO DO045 2
81
I - D L L A VE6A VEDO 0 0 0 4 3 2
81
I.DE L A VE6A VEDO DO043 2
81
I - D E LA VE6A VEDO 0 0 0 4 3 481
M-OE LA VE6A VEDO 0 0 0 4 3 481
RODE LA VESA VEDO 0 0 0 4 3 381
MODE LA VE6A VEDO DO043 2
81
RODE LA VE6A VEDO DO043 2
8 0 0 8 A-V~HUHINOVr
A0085 1 578