Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 51 No. 1 (March 2014)
1Development of the High Efficiency and Flexible
Gas Turbine M701F5 by Applying“J” Class Gas Turbine Technologies
TOSHISHIGE AI*1

JUNICHIRO MASADA*2EISAKU ITO*3

The development of gas turbines, which Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MHI) has
continued to pursue, contributes to society in terms of global environmental conservation and astable energy supply. MHI leverages its abundant gas turbine operation experience and takes
advantage of its extensive advanced technologies research on “Component TechnologyDevelopment for 1,700°C Class Ultra-High-Temperature Gas Turbines” for the national project.
The company has been participating in this project since 2004. Recent years’ achievements
includes the demonstration of a gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) efficiency in excess of 61.5%
by increasing the turbine inlet temperature to the 1,600°C class in the M501J in 2011(1)(2)(3). The
M701F5 incorporates “J” gas turbine technologies, already applied to actual equipment, forefficiency improvement. It also applies air-cooled combustor technologies successfully validated inthe GAC, for increased flexibility. The delivery of the initial unit is scheduled for 2014. This paper
explains the features and development status of M701F5 gas turbine.

|1. Introduction
Gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) power generation represent the most efficient andcleanest way to generate power using fossil fuels. It also features a high load following capability
and as a result has a high affinity with renewable energy. Global demand for GTCC power
generation equipment has been increasing following the development of shale gas fields and theincrease in the supply of natural gas.
An increase of gas turbine temperature constitutes an important element to improve theefficiency of GTCC power generation. In 1984 MHI developed the M701D gas turbine featuring an
inlet temperature of 1,100°C. Since that time, the development of technologies that improve thecapacity, efficiency and reliability of GTCC plants was actively promoted at MHI. This led to thedevelopment of the 1350°C class M501F in 1989 and the 1,500°C class M501G in 1997. MHI
joined the “Component Technology Development for 1,700 °C class Ultra-High-Temperature GasTurbines” national project in 2004, targeting further improvement of gas turbine efficiency. Efforts
were made to develop the advanced technologies needed to realize high temperature and highefficiency. Using some of the achievements, the 1,600°C class turbine inlet temperature M501J wasdeveloped and validated in 2011 (Figure 1, Figure 2). This frame features a GTCC thermalefficiency in excess of 61.5%. The 50 Hz M701J, a scale design of the 60 Hz M501J, has also beendeveloped, with the first unit scheduled for delivery in 2014.
In parallel with the development of new frames, MHI continuously improves existing gasturbines by applying the technologies developed for new frames. The performance and reliability of
the 50Hz F units were improved sequentially to the “F2”, “F3” and “F4” after completing thedevelopment of the M701F gas turbine in 1992. The “F4” benefitted from the introduction of newtechnologies validated by the “G” gas turbine which features a 1,500°C class turbine inlet
temperature. The development of a state-of the-art gas turbine M701F5 has been completed, whichis based on the “F4” basic structure and incorporates “J” gas turbine technologies (Figure 3). The
first unit is now under manufacturing and will be delivered in 2014.
*1Engineering Manager, Takasago Gas Turbine Engineering Department, Gas Turbine Products Headquarters, Power Systems Division*2Director, Takasago Gas Turbine Engineering Department, Gas Turbine Products Headquarters, Power Systems Division*3

Deputy Director, Takasago Research & Development Center, Technology & Innovation Headquarters

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 51 No. 1 (March 2014)
2Figure 1History of improvements in temperature and efficiency of MHI gas turbines

Figure 2Development history of Mitsubishi gas turbines

Figure 3Evolution of F-class gas turbine

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 51 No. 1 (March 2014)
3

Resulting in MHI continuous efforts to introduce new technologies, the output of the M701F
gas turbine (234MW) was increased to 359 MW for the M701F5, which has approximately 1.5
times higher generation capacity while improving the combined efficiency by more than 12% overthe past 20 years, contributing substantially to a reduction in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.
Table 1 shows the main features including the gas turbine and GTCC performance of the M701F,
F4 and F5.
Table 1 Gas turbine performance (ISO, Standard condition) and major specifications
Frame
Year of initial unit delivery
Rotating Speed
Gas turbine output
GTCC output
GTCC efficiency (LHV)
Compressor
Combustor
Turbine

M701F
1992
3000 rpm
234 MW
334 MW
54.4%

M701F42009
3000 rpm
312 MW
465 MW
59.5%
17 stages
Air-cooled type 20 cans
1st to 3rd stages Air cooling
4th stage
Not cooled

M701F52014
3000 rpm
359 MW
525 MW
61% min.

|2. Features of the M701F5 Gas Turbine
The M701F5 gas turbine is structurally based on its predecessor the M701F4, but
incorporates advanced component technologies applied to other frames, following MHI design
philosophy to ensure reliability and improve efficiency at the same time. The compressor is basedon the M701F4, but incorporates CDA (Control Diffusion Airfoil) profiles for efficiencyimprovement. The combustor incorporates a Dry Low NOx combustion system, which is theproven air-cooling technology verified in the “GAC”. The aerodynamics and cooling technologies
developed for the 1,600°C class “J” are incorporated in the turbine. Figure 4 and Figure 5(4) show
the technologies introduced to the “F5” gas turbine and their characteristics.

2.1

Basic Structure

Large gas turbines must supply electric power constantly; therefore Reliability and flexibility
are essential. The M701F5 gas turbine is structurally based on the “F” gas turbine and has the same
bearing span of its predecessor. The “F” adopts a highly-reliable basic structure that has beenvalidated by many years of operation. The features of the basic structure are described below.
(1) 2-bearing support system(2) Horizontal split casing which ensures easy disassembly and inspection(3) Cold-end drive to reduce the influence of thermal expansion(4) Axial exhaust appropriate for the layout of the combined cycle power plantarrangement(5) Tangential strut structure that reduces the thermal expansion induced verticaldisplacement of the bearing core during operation(6) Bolt-joined rotor that transmits torque perfectly by torque pin in the compressor sideand the curvic coupling in the turbine(7) Side entry compressor and turbine rotating blades, which allows in-situ blade
replacement without lifting the rotor(8) Blade ring structure that prevents deformation and keeps tip clearance at the minimumlevel(9) Multi-can combustor featuring easy maintenanceA total of 197 “F” class units have been delivered. The fleet has accumulated 9,097,000
actual operating hours with 86,800 start and stop as of September 2013, indicating abundant
operation experience. The data is shown in Table 2. The 60 Hz units were delivered in westernJapan, East Asia and North and Central America, while the 50 Hz units were delivered to easternJapan, Southeast Asia, Europe and South America. They are contributing to the stable supply ofpower in each region.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 51 No. 1 (March 2014)
4Table 2FF2F3F4F5Total

Operating Experience of “F” Class Gas turbine (as of September 2013)

M501F series (60Hz)
In Operation New Order
Sub-total
200204765367673

M701F series (50Hz)
In Operation New Order
Sub-total
1401420272
375
16132904410420124

F Feet Total: 197 Units (171 In Operation, 26 New Order)‐Accumulated Experience: 9,097,000 hours / 86,800 starts
F3 Feet Total: 128 Units (119 In Operation, 9 New Order)‐Accumulated Experience: 5,571,000 hours / 51,700 starts‐Lead M501F3 unit: 99,400 hours / 2,400 starts‐Lead M701F3 unit: 104,000 hours / 1,300 starts
F4 Feet Total: 29 Units (16 In Operation, 13 New Order)‐Accumulated Experience: 129,000 hours / 1,500 starts‐Lead M701F4 unit: 22,500 hours / 180 starts

Figure 4Relationship between other frames and M701F5

Figure 5Features of M701F5 gas turbine

TOTAL
342128294197

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 51 No. 1 (March 2014)
52.2

Compressor

The aerodynamic stability of the compressor is highly affected by the first compressor stage.
If designed properly, it can prevent or diminish the effect of rotating stall and other instabilities
during startup. The F4 compressor has demonstrated stable behavior and low sensitivity to
instabilities during start up. Therefore, the same flow path has been applied to the M701F5. Inother words, the same blades as “F4” are used for the front 6 stages of “F5” and the inlet air flowrate and the blade tip speed on the first stage are also the same. The same resilience to start-up
instabilities is expected based on the operation experience of the “F4”. The blades and vanes profileon the middle and rear stages were changed from the conventional NACA to CDA blades toimprove efficiency (Figure 6). The CDA blade features optimized velocity distribution on theblade surface. MHI incorporated this type of blade in the “G”, “H” and “J” gas turbines, whichwere developed after the F introduction. This CDA blade is also used on the front stage of the F4units and they have accumulated more than 120,000 hours. The CDA blades are proven technology
widely used in MHI recent developments including the “F4”. For this reason, the “F5” compressor
also incorporates this technology levering the excellent results obtained in the “F4” providing
reliability while improving efficiency.

Figure 6

2.3

Comparison between NACA and CDA profiles

Combustor

The combustor technologies that have been applied to the “GAC” were incorporated in the“F5”. The nozzle and the swirler that exhibited stable combustion performance in the “GAC” andafterwards in the 1,600°C class “J” gas turbine (Figure 7) are applied to the F5. The transition
piece of the J is cooled with steam supplied from outside the gas turbine while an air cooled gasturbine, like the F5 does not link the steam cycle with the gas turbine providing improved
flexibility. This is the same concept applied to the “GAC”.

Figure 7

Common combustors parts among “GAC”, “J” and “F5”

Because the air used for the combustor cooling is mixed with combustion gas in thecombustor, the flame temperature inside the combustor increases against the turbine inlet
temperature (average gas temperature at the 1st stage stationary vane). The flame temperature
affects NOx and combustion stability, therefore, the air-cooled “F5” flame temperature wasselected at the lower level than that of steam-cooled “J”. Consequently, the turbine inlet
temperature of the “F5” is lower than that of the “J”, and the “F5” cooling design of turbine parts
was optimized in response to the results.
Following the successful experience of the GAC and J, the combustor by-pass has been

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 51 No. 1 (March 2014)
6eliminated in the F5 to increase reliability. In addition, MGA (Mitsubishi Gas Turbine Alloy)
material originally developed for the turbine stationary vanes is applied to a precision casting areaat the outlet of the transition piece, which is subjected to severe thermal stress.
A high pressure combustion test using the “F5” combustor was completed in MHI Takasago
Works test facility. This test confirmed that the NOx level is far below the target value of NOx 15ppm (15% O2 conversion) and the combustion stability and metal temperature of the combustor
basket and the transition piece, which affect its reliability, are within allowable limit with sufficientmargin.

2.4Turbine

The turbine blades and vanes are exposed to high-temperature and high-pressure combustion
gas from the combustor. They are cooled by compressor discharge air or bleed air from theintermediate stage of the compressor to keep the metal temperature of the blades and vanes within
the limit value to ensure the designed service life. However, cooling air becomes a loss in theturbine section and therefore it is key to improve performance to reduce the amount of cooling air
applied without affecting the reliability of the components.
Cooling technologies have advanced in line with the increase in turbine inlet temperature(Figure 8). The “J” featuring a 1,600°C class turbine inlet temperature incorporates the advanced
TBC technologies and high-efficiency film cooling technologies developed by the “Component
Technology Development for 1,700 °C class Ultra-High-Temperature Gas Turbines” national
project that MHI has been involved with since 2004.

Figure 8Turbine blade technologies for each frame

The “F5” and the “J” include a 4-stage turbine with TBC (Thermal Barrier Coating) applied
to the blades and vanes of the three front stages. Heat input from high-temperature gas to turbineblades is reduced by the adoption of the advanced TBC, which features a higher heat shield effectand durability compared with conventional coating materials. This contributes to a reduction in thecooling air rate for the blade metal temperature at a level below the limit value. The durability ofthe advanced TBC was confirmed by laser thermal cycle test (Figure 9) before application to actual
blades.

Figure 9

Laser thermal cycle test of advanced TBC

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 51 No. 1 (March 2014)
7High-efficiency film cooling (Figure 10) is incorporated for cooling the surface of theturbine blades. This method is more effective than conventional film cooling. In film cooling, thegas path on the blade surface is covered by cooled air to reduce the gas temperature on the bladesurface. The outlet shape of the cooling holes on the film was optimized to cover a wider area ofthe blade surface with the same film air rate, optimizing the total cooling air amount.
The advanced TBC technologies and high-efficiency film cooling technologies wereoriginally developed by the national project for 1,700°C class gas turbines and validated by the
1,600°C class “J” gas turbine. They were incorporated in “F5” gas turbine, resulting in improved
reliability and performance at the same time.

Figure 10

High-efficiency film cooling|3. “F5” Technologies Validated at T point
To develop gas turbines, MHI first validates each component technology at the researchlaboratory, followed by detailed designing and production of the actual engine. The products arevalidated at the power generation facility for demonstration (T point) at the final process of newtechnology validation. T point is a combined cycle power plant installed in the premises of MHITakasago Works. This plant is equipped with a gas turbine, a steam turbine and a heat recovery
steam generator (HRSG) (Figure 11), where the M501G started operation in January 1997 and theperformance and reliability of “G” were verified.

Figure 11

Power generation facility for validation (T point)Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 51 No. 1 (March 2014)
8T point gas turbine was later upgraded to M501G1 and M501GAC to verify theirfunctionality. In October 2010, T point was renovated for validation of the M501J with the 1600°C
commissioning operation starting in February 2011. More than 2,300 temporary measurement
sensors were equipped for this engine, confirming that its performance, mechanical characteristics
and combustion stability satisfied the target values.
Figure 12 shows the metal temperature distribution of the row 1 stationary vane. The metal
temperature at each location is well within the limit value, indicating that there are no problems interms of reliability. The profile and platform metal temperature of row 1 rotation blade weremeasured with a pyrometer confirming satisfactory results. The metal temperature measurement
results at the platform of row 1 rotating blade are shown in Figure 13.

Figure 13 Metal temperature
measurement results of row 1
rotating blade of M501J turbine

Figure 12 Metal temperature measurement resultsof row 1 stationary vane of M501J turbine

After completing the M501J commissioning in June 2011, the long-term reliability validation
started and is still ongoing. As of the end of September 2013, the operating experience reached13,100 hours and the 130 start and stop. Figure 14 shows the results of inspections performed in
March 2013. The results indicate that the parts after operation remain in good condition.
The lessons learnt from operation and inspections obtained at the T point have also beenreflected in the M701F5. The air-cooled combustor technologies leverage the “GAC” successful
experience and the turbine technologies for the “J”. This contributes to the high performance andreliability of “F5” gas turbines.

Figure 14

Inspection results of M501J at T point (March 2013: 10,548 hours/120times)

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 51 No. 1 (March 2014)9|4. Conclusion
MHI has developed gas turbines based on abundant gas turbine operation experience andresearch for advanced technologies including a national project named “Component TechnologyDevelopment for 1,700°C class Ultra-High-Temperature Gas Turbines.” The development of theM701F5 incorporating turbine technologies validated by actual operation in the latest 1,600°C class
M501J was successfully completed. The gas turbine components are currently being manufactured,with the delivery of the initial unit scheduled for 2014 and trial operations expected to start in fiscal
2015. Gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) power generation features the highest level ofefficiency among fossil fuels power generation while being environmentally friendly. Under thesecircumstances and with power sources increasingly diversified and scattered, the M701F5 gas
turbine will contribute to the stable supply of electricity to the world in the future with highflexibility and high efficiency.

References
1. Hada, S., Masada, J., Ito, E. and Tsukagoshi, K., Evolution and Future Trend of Large Frame Gas Turbine
for Power Generation - A new 1600 degree C J class gas turbine -, ASME Turbo Expo, GT2012-68574
2. Hada, S. et al., Test Results of the World’s First 1,600oC J-series Gas Turbine, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Technical Review Vol. 49 No. 1 (2012), pp. 19-24
3. Yuri, M. et al., Development of 1600°C-Class High-efficiency Gas Turbine for Power Generation Applying
J-Type Technology, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 50 No. 3 (2013), pp. 2-10
4. Ai et al., Development of M701F5 Gas Turbine，The Thermal and Nuclear Power Generation Convention(2012) pp 131-138