JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the project3MW Solar Power Project in Chillan, Nuble Region

Reference number

CL002

Third-party entity (TPE)

Lloyd's

Register

Quality Assurance

Limited(LRQA)
Project participant contracting the TPE

FARMLAND Co., Ltd.

Date of completion of this report

17/05/2022

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed using
document form
the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to the typeof project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology andapproved JCM that the applied version is valid at the time of submission of
the proposed JCM project for validation.
methodology(ies)
Emission
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in thesourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposedemission
JCM project.
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante
listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental impact
impactassessment, if required by the Republic of Chile, in line withassessment
Chilean procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
stakeholder
consultation process and that due steps were taken to engage
consultation
stakeholders and solicit comments for the proposed project.
Monitoring
The description of the Monitoring Plan (Monitoring Plan
1

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Name

Company

Function*

Mr.
Ms.

Michiaki
Chiba

LRQA Ltd.

Team leader

Mr.
Ms.

Olga Rivas

LRQA SpainTeammemberSchemecompetence*

Alejandra
Team
IsabelLRQA Ltd.
memberLlarena
Astudillo
Mr.
XianxinInternal
LRQA China
Ms.
Yanreviewer
Please specify the following for each item.
Mr.
Ms.

Technical
competence*
Technical
competenceauthorised

On-site
visit

N/A

N/A

N/A

* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader, teammember, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
The project participants (The PPs) are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of
the project design document (PDD) with the monitoring spreadsheet

in accordance with therequirements of JCM rules and the validator is responsible for expressing an opinion on the
PDD based on the validation. The PDD was checked and confirmed as complete against the
JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document (PDD) and Monitoring Report (MR)No. JCM_CL_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0. A valid form of the JCM PDD Form as of the time ofcommencement of the public comment period No. JCM_CL_F_PDD_ver02.0 was used for the
PDD Version 01.0 dated 24/09/2021. The revised PDD Version 02.0 dated 22/02/2022 was also
checked the completeness through the validation.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.

3

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the PDD was completed using the valid form of the JCM
PDD Form and in accordance with the JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR.
C.2. Project description<Means of validation>
The project is to install a 3 MW grid connected solar photovoltaic (PV) power plant in Chillan,
Nuble Region in Chile, displace a part of electricity generated from fossil fuel firing power
plants connected to the national electricity grid system and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions. Total 2,979.2 kW of solar PV panels XSOL XLM144-400SV single crystal module(400 Wp x 7,448 pcs) have been installed with single axis solar tracking system.
The project is implemented by Land and Sea SpA and Farmdo Energy Chile SpA from The
Republic of Chile and FARMLAND Co., Ltd. from Japan (the PPs).
The start date of project operation is on 04/06/2021 and the expected operational lifetime ofthe project is for 17 years. The PPs referred to the Statutory useful life for the calculation ofdepreciation and amortization for machinery and equipment issued by Japan’s Ministry of
Finance for the basis of the expected operational lifetime of the project solar power system
indicated as for 17 years (the other facilities mainly made of metal).
The project receives financial support for JCM model projects from the Ministry of theEnvironment, Japan. The project contributes to a sustainable power supply using renewableenergy in Chile.
The validation team assessed the PDD and the supporting documents, interviewed the PPs tovalidate the requirements concerning accuracy and completeness of the project description.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CL 1
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were required to provide relevant evidence to support thestart date of the project operation on 04/06/2021.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs provided relevant supporting documents forreview by the validation team.
Assessment of the responses: The start date of the project operation was confirmed based on
the evidence submitted by the PPs including the Commisioning Protocol from the TechnicalStandard for Connection and Operation of Small Distributed Generation Means in Medium
Voltage Installations and Commissioning Request Letter sent and signed by the legal
4

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

representative of Farmdo Energy Chile SpA to the sector institution National Electrical
Coordinator in conformance with the Technical Standard for Connection and Operation of
Small Distributed Generation Means in Medium Voltage Installations.
The electricity generation started from 05/06/2021 following the completion of the gridconnection on 04/06/2021.
The CL was closed.
Grade / Ref: CAR 1
Nature of the issue raised: The monitoring point number corresponding to that in the
Monitoring Plan Sheet (MPS) was not indicated in the figure of PDD Section C.2.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The monitoring point number is added in the figureof PDD Section C.2.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team confirmed that the monitoring point number
is added in the figure of Section C.2. in the revised PDD.
The CAR was closed.
Grade / Ref: CL 2
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were required to clarify the basis of the estimated GHG
emission reductions in the first year indicated in the PDD Section C.3.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs provided the calculation details for the GHG
emission reductions in the first year.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the calculation for the first yearthat used the same calculation tool and data as the subsequent years while it considered thegeneration start date of 05/06/2021 and 26 operation days in June 2021. The estimated values
from July to December are the same as the subsequent years.
The CL was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team assessed the project description provided in the PDD with the supporting
documents to the requirements on the accuracy and completeness. The validation teamconfirmed that the proposed JCM project in the PDD is described in accurate and completemanners that is understandable the nature of the proposed project activity.
C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
The project applied the approved methodology JCM_CL_AM001_ver02.0 Installation of Solar
PV System, Version 02.0.
5

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

LRQA assessed if the selected methodology is applicable to the proposed project. The projectapplicability was checked against each eligibility criterion in the selected approved
methodology. The steps taken to validate each eligibility criterion and the conclusions about its
applicability to the proposed project are summarised as below.
Criterion 1: The project newly installs solar PV system(s).
Justification in the PDD: 3MW solar PV system is newly installed.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the project documentation,technical specification, the project completion report, and a remote assessment includinginterviews.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that the
project newly installed solar PV system at Chillan, Nuble Region in Chile and the criterion is
met.
Criterion 2: The PV modules are certified for design qualifications (IEC 61215,IEC 61646 or
IEC 62108) and safety qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2).
Justification in the PDD: Introduced PV modules comply with design qualifications (IEC61215) and safety qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2).
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the technical specification,
certificates of design qualifications and safety qualification, the project completion report, anda remote assessment including interviews.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that the
PV modules of the project solar PV system have obtained the certificates in compliance with
the international standards IEC61215, IEC61730-1, IEC61730-2 and IEC61701. The criterion
was therefore satisfied.
Criterion 3: The equipment used for monitoring output power of the solar PV system(s) andirradiance is installed at the project site.
Justification in the PDD: The monitoring equipment for output power and irradiance of thesolar PV system(s) have been installed at the project site.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the technical specification,
the project completion report, and a remote assessment including interviews.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that themonitoring equipment has been installed for output power of the solar PV system as well as
irradiance at the project site. Thus the criterion was confirmed as satisfied by the project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
6

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the project applied the valid version of the approved
methodology and the applicability was demonstrated to the eligibility criteria.
C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>
The project supplies electricity generated by 3 MW solar PV system and displaces electricity
generation in the national power grid system. Total 2,979.2 kW of solar PV panels XSOLXLM144-400SV single crystal module (400 Wp x 7,448 pcs) have been installed with solar
tracking system. Total 67 AI equipped single axis trackers installed with the project contributeincrease of solar electricity generation. The tracker consumes 0.08 kWh each per day according
to the manufacturer’s specification. The electricity meter is installed at the exit of the projectsolar power plant and the grid connection point to measure net electricity exported to the grid
after deducted the internal electricity consumption.
The source of GHG emissions is consumption of grid electricity and CO2 emissions in thereference scenario are considered to determine the reference emissions (REs), while the projectemissions (PEs) are assumed to be zero for the solar PV system in accordance with the applied
methodology. The annual electricity generation of the project is estimated ex-ante at 6,023.461
MWh. The default CO2 emission factor of 0.404 t-CO2/MWh for the SEN grid is applied as
the project locates in the suburb of Chillan, approximately 400 km south of the capital Santiago,
Chile. The annual GHG emission reductions (ERs) are calculated using the estimated annual
electricity generation of the project: ERs = REs – PEs = 6,023.461 MWh x 0.404 – 0 = 2,433
t-CO2e. The project started operation from 04/06/2021 and the ERs in the first year is estimatedat 1,291 tCO2e considering 26 days of generation and internal consumption in June 2021.
The validation team assessed the documented evidence and confirmed that all the relevant
GHG emission sources covered in the applied methodology are addressed, and the steps taken
and the equations applied to calculate REs for the proposed project comply with therequirements of the approved methodology.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 2
Nature of the issue raised: The Monitoring Plan Sheet did not confirm which of the Case 1,
7

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Case 2 or Case 3 are applied to the proposed JCM project for determination of the electricity
emission factor.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs confirmed that the Case 1 is applicable tothe project and provided the revised MP.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the revised MP received from thePPs and confirmed the information corrected.
The CAR was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that:- The methodology was applied correctly to calculate PEs and REs and no other significant
emission source was identified that would be affected and reasonably attributed by
implementation of the proposed project but not addressed by the applied methodology;- The choice of whether an emission source or gas is to be included where the applied
methodology allows was reasonably justified by the PPs;
- The Monitoring Plan Sheet (MPS) was not altered and the fields were filled in as required sothat all estimates of the REs could be replicated using the data and parameter values provided
in the PDD;- The values for the project specific parameters fixed ex ante listed in the MPS were appropriate
with all the data sources and assumptions and the calculations were correct to the proposed
JCM project;- All assumptions and data used by the PPs were listed in the PDD, including their references
and sources; and- All values used in the PDD were considered reasonable in the context of the proposed JCM
project.
C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
The project installs total 2,979.2 kW solar PV system and an environmental impact assessment
is not required by laws of the host country. The validation team assessed the applicable legal
requirements in the host country using its local sources/expertise and confirmed that anenvironmental impact assessment is not required to be conducted for implementation of the
project.
The details of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
8

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed by assessing the relevant documents and using the local
sources/expertise that the project does not need an environmental impacts assessment to be
conducted to meet the legal requirement of the host country and the PDD satisfies therequirements of the JCM.
C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
The PPs identified the government of the host country and local consultant as the main local
stakeholder and held a consultation meeting. Representatives of the local stakeholder attended
the meeting provided no negative comment through the process.
The details of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the PPs have invited comments to the proposed projectfrom the relevant local stakeholders, the summary of the comments received is provided in the
PDD in a complete manner and the PPs have taken due account of all the comments received
from the local stakeholders as the processes described in the PDD.
C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
The MP consisting of the MPS and Monitoring Structure Sheet (MSS) is based on the approved
methodology.
The electricity generated by the project solar PV system is directly and continuously measured.
The reading is taken by an electricity meter.
The electricity meter is designed to comply with requirements of IEC 62053-22 and theaccuracy class is 0.2s.
The roles and responsibilities of the persons are described in the MSS in accordance with therequirements of the applied methodology. The reading results of electricity meters are monthly
recorded, checked by the Project supervisors.
The validation team confirmed that the MP complied with the requirements in the approved9

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

methodology and that the PPs will be able to apply the MP following the monitoringarrangements described in it.
CAR 3 and CAR 4 were issued that the details of resolution are as described below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 3
Nature of the issue raised: The measurement method and procedures of the Monitoring Plan
Sheet (MPS) was not completed with the detailed information of the measuring equipment,
accuracy level and the calibration information (frequency, date of calibration and validity).
The PPs were also required to describe the QA/QC procedures applied to monitoring of theparameter.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs submitted the revised MP with the supporting
evidence.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the revised MP and supporting
evidence provided by the PPs and confirmed that the information required is filled.
The CAR was closed.
Grade / Ref: CAR 4
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs are required to confirm how the PPs ensure that data
monitored and required for verification and issuance be kept and archived electronically for
two years after the final issuance of credits.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs submitted the revised MP with the supporting
evidence. The PPs confirmed that the contract has been signed with the provider of themonitoring system and it will be maintained to keep the monitored data for the required period.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the revised MP and supporting
evidence provided by the PPs and confirmed that the information required is filled.
The CAR was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the MP was described in compliance with the requirementsof the approved methodology and the Guidelines for developing PDD and MR, and the PPs
have demonstrated feasibility of the monitoring structure and their ability to implement the MP.
C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>10

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The MoC was submitted to LRQA in the form JCM_CL_F_MoC_ver01.0. The MoC nominates
FARMLAND Co., Ltd. as the focal point and was signed by the authorized representatives of
all the PPs with the contact details. The form used is the latest one as of the time of validation.
The validation team directly checked evidence for corporate and personal identity and details,
employment and specimen signatures presented in the MoC through the remote assessment
including interviews.
CAR 5 was issued that the details of resolution are as described below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 5
Nature of the issue raised: The form of MoC was not completed with the required information.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: Revised MoC was submitted to the validation team.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the revised MoC and confirmed
the relevant information is filled for the PPs.
The CAR was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the MoC was completed using the latest form after
assessment conducted on relevance of the MoC in compliance with the requirements of the
JCM Guidelines.
C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
The validation team assessed and confirmed relevance of the written confirmation in the MoC
from the PPs that the proposed JCM project was not registered under the other international
climate mitigation mechanisms.
The team in addition to the interviews with the PPs checked publicly accessible information of
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), Joint Implementation (JI), Verified Carbon Standard(VCS) and Gold Standard (GS). Particular attention was given to that there are total 16 solar
power projects in Chile proposed to the other schemes andbut found none of them was identicalto project as the proposed JCM project in terms of the name of entities, applied technology,
scale, the equipment manufacturer and model, and the location. The result of researches
confirmed that the proposed project was not registered under the other international climate
mitigation mechanisms than JCM and it will not result in a double counting of GHG emission
reductions.
11

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the proposed JCM project was not registered under theother international climate mitigation mechanisms.
C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
The start date for the operation of the proposed JCM project is indicated in the PDD as
04/06/2021.
The validation team confirmed correctness/relevance of the information by reviewing the
supporting evidence, including but not limited to assessing of the contracts and projectcompletion report, and that the date is not before 01/01/2013 as required to be eligible as a JCM
project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the start date of operation of the proposed JCM project is
04/06/2021 and not before 01/01/2013 as required to be eligible as a JCM project.
C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No issue was identified as relevant element not covered above.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Not applicable<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
Not applicable12

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
In line with the JCM Project Cycle Procedure, the PDD is to be made publicly available for 30days to invite public comments. The PDD was made publicly available in line with therequirements of the procedure for the period of 07/02/2022 to 05/02/2022 as per
https://www.jcm.go.jp/cl-jp/projects/102.

D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
No comment was received during the above period to receive public inputs.
Thus no action was required to be taken by the PPs to satisfy the JCM requirement.

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees
FARMLAND
Yusuke Murota, General Manager, Overseas Business Department (Project manager)
Laura Andrades Fernández, Project coordinator, Overseas Business Department (Project
supervisor)
Land and Sea SpA / Farmdo Energy Chile SpA
Javier Lorenzo Campos Carcamo, CEO
Gustavo Enrique Reyes Franco, Electrical Project Engineer (Project supervisor)
Felipe Alonso Leal Lara, Project Manager
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd.
Sae Ishiyama, Consultant

E.2. List of documents received
Category A documents (documents prepared by the PP)- PDD Version 01.0 dated 24/09/2021 with the monitoring spreadsheet

13

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- Revised PDD Version 02.0 dated 22/02/2022 with the monitoring spreadsheet- MoC dated 19/10/2021- Project introduction by Farmdo Energy Chile SpA- Introduction of LAS Energy- Project schedule- EPC contract- Technical specification of photovoltaic module- Photographs of project construction- Commissioning report for inverter- Commissioning Test Report for Trackers- Installation Report for SCADA system- Conditions of warranty for the solar modules- Electricity diagram- Product data sheet for power meter- Specification of power control station, data acquisition, data loggers, pyranometer- National regulation for electricity meter- Test and calibration certificate for electricity meter- Certificate of IEC 61215- Certificate of IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2- Estimated power generation and CO2 emission reductions- Yield assessment of the photovoltaic power plant- Records of monitored data
- List of electricity CO2 emission factor- Monitoring manual- Reading instruction for electricity meter- Evidence for authorized signatories for the MoC- Technical report for solar project- Records of local stakeholder consultation- Commisioning Protocol from the Technical Standard for Connection and Operation of Small
Distributed Generation Means in Medium Voltage Installations- Commissioning Request Letter sent and signed by the legal representative of Farmdo Energy
Chile SpA to the sector institution National Electrical Coordinator in conformance with theTechnical Standard for Connection and Operation of Small Distributed Generation Means in
Medium Voltage Installations.
- Operation & Maintenance Best Practice guidelines for Solar Power Plant- VCOM license agreement- Revised MoC dated 29/04/2022
14

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- Additional evidence for revised MoC
Category B documents (other documents referenced)- JCM_CL_AM001_ver02.0 Installation of Solar PV System, Version 02.0
- JCM Approved Methodology Revision Request to JCM_CL_AM001_ver01.0- Additional information on calculating the emission factors of Chile for the JCM- JCM Project Cycle Procedure JCM_CL_PCP_ver02.0- JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification JCM_CL_GL_VV_ver01.0- JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR JCM_CL_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0- JCM Glossary of Terms JCM_CL_Glossary_ver01.0- JCM PDD Form JCM_CL_F_PDD_ver02.0- JCM MoC Statement Form JCM_CL_F_MoC_ver01.0- JCM Validation Report Form JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- XSOL single crystal solar PV module – product information- Validation and uncertainty of solar resource data, Solargis- Methodology – Solar radiation modelling, Solargis- Technical specification, Solargis- Solar prospecting tool for fast and reliable project pre-feasibility, Solargis- Energy supply by source – Chile, IEA- Energy Policies beyond IEA Countries – Chile- Energy Policies of Chile ENERGIA 2050
- Approved Small Scale CDM Methodology AMS I.D. Version 18.0 Grid connected renewableelectricity generation- Approved CDM Methodological Tool to calculate the Emission Factor for an electricity
system- Proposed and registered projects under CDM, VCS, Gold Standard, and the other international
schemes- IEC 62053-22, Electricity metering equipment (a,c,) - Particular requirements - Part 22: Static
meters for active energy (classes 0.2 S and 0.5 S)- ISO 14064-2:2019 - Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification,
monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements- ISO 14064-3:2019 – Specification with guidance for the verification and validation ofgreenhouse gas statements

15

JCM_CL_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers.
Certificate of Appointment is attached to this report.

16

Joint Crediting Mechanism Certificate of Appointment
Title of Project: 3MW Solar Power Project in Chillan, Nuble Region(Ref No. CL002)

We hereby certify that the following personnel have engaged in the validation process thathas fully satisfied the competence requirements of the validation of the JCM project.

Name of Person

Assigned Roles

Michiaki Chiba

Team Leader

Olga Rivas

Team Member

Alejandra Isabel Llarena AstudilloTeam Member

Xianxin Yan

Technical Reviewer

Signed byMichiaki Chiba
Climate Change Manager – Asia & Pacific29/12/2021

LRQA Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries, including LRQA Limited (LRQA), and their respective officers, employees or agents are,individually and collectively, referred to in this Legal Section as 'LRQA'. LRQA assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for
any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has
signed a contract with the relevant LRQA entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is
exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.

MSBSF43618

Revision 1