Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 52 No. 1 (March 2015)30

Development of Platform for Total Energy Management- Proposal for Total Energy Solution -YOKO KOYANAGI*1

HITOI ONO*2

MANABU MIYAMOTO*3 TOMOYUKI ENOMOTO*4

TSUKASA KAWAZOE*5 MASAHARU WATABE*6

In response to the need for liberalization and the stable supply of energy, energy supply
systems have been diversified and many options are now available. On the other hand, the prompt
proposal and evaluation of large-scale energy supply systems consisting of various pieces ofenergy equipment and related operating procedures has become difficult. Mitsubishi HeavyIndustries, Ltd. (MHI) is working on the development of a platform for offering a total energy
solution that realizes efficient energy utilization under normal circumstances and ensures business
continuity in times of emergency such as power outages or equipment failure. This paper describes
an overview, applications, and the future development of the planning system, which is a part of theplatform.

|1. Introduction
Distributed power supply systems are attracting attention as a means of the stable supply ofenergy to deal with risks caused by large-scale natural disasters and changes in social conditions.
As energy liberalization moves forward, various energy utilization options have become available.
Actions for energy leveling and the reduction of supply amount based on this background are
spreading widely from households to factories and cities, and therefore increases in number and thediversification of the types of energy equipment have been progressing. As a result, thecombination and operating procedures of the equipment became complicated and branched out, andit is now hard to examine them with existing manual calculation.
In addition, advances in sensing technology and information and communications technology
in recent years have enabled the understanding and visualization of energy flow at a low cost, andas a result, energy management systems utilizing ICT have become increasingly widespread.
MHI is proceeding with the offering of total energy solutions that satisfy both efficientenergy utilization under normal circumstances and business continuity in times of emergency
through working on 1S5R (Store, Reduce (reduction of demand), React (reaction to demandaccording to supply), Reuse, Recovery, and Recycle) as shown in Figure 1. In that process, MHI
has developed a planning system for a large-scale energy supply system consisting of various
energy equipment, that enables the prompt proposal and evaluation of more optimum combinationsof energy equipment and operating procedures, utilizing knowledge accumulated from thecompany’s position as a comprehensive machinery manufacturer. The following chapters describe
an overview and applications of the developed planning system.

*1*2*3*4*5*6

Hiroshima Research & Development Center, Technology & Innovation Headquarters
Manager, Hiroshima Research & Development Center, Technology & Innovation Headquarters
Chief Staff Manager, ICT Solution Center ICT Solution Headquarters
Manager, Business Development Department, Energy & Environment
Manager, Business Development Department, Business Strategy Division, Machinery, Equipment & Infrastructure
Deputy Director, Business Development Department, Energy & Environment

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 52 No. 1 (March 2015)31

Figure 1Total energy solution|2. Features of the developed planning system
An energy solution consists of measures to minimize or level the energy demand forelectricity and heat (steam, chilled water, hot water, etc.) and to supply the necessary amount ofenergy efficiently. Energy solutions also need to consider the stability of energy for business
continuity in times of emergency, including start-up time and the transient behavior of theequipment.
Measures for energy supply are roughly classified into (1) operation planning and (2) system
planning. (1) Operation planning evaluates the operation of the equipment, which bases the runningcost including the cost of maintaining the energy supply system and CO2 emission amount asindexes, in terms of daily electric and heat demand. (2) System planning evaluates, in considerationof annual demand fluctuation and future changes in demand, the initial cost of the introduced
equipment and changes of running cost between before and after the introduction of the equipment.

Figure 2

Structure of developed system

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 52 No. 1 (March 2015)32

Furthermore, system planning is broadly classified into cases where some of the equipment isreplaced and cases where a new energy supply system is introduced. Partial replacement ofequipment requires consideration for compatibility with existing equipment and long-term systemplanning.
For these measures, various conditions that vary depending on the object items of theexamination or the targets, such as the rate system of electricity or fuel, the electric and heat
demand, etc., must be considered in addition to various characteristics of the equipment. This is oneof the causes complicating the examination process. In order to make these measure examination
processes simple and efficient, MHI has developed a planning system with the following features.
Figure 2 presents the structure of the developed planning system.

2.1

Simple evaluation process

In the developed planning system, the processes necessary for the energy solution evaluation
are arranged and defined as the five steps shown in Figure 2: (1) setting of the region, (2) setting of
the industrial sector, (3) setting of the energy supply system, (4) execution of calculation and (5)evaluation. The setting of the region, the setting of the industrial sector and the setting of the energy
supply system are entered by the user. The user follows the steps to enter the input values required
for the examination.
The user can examine the optimum solution by changing the input values of the setting of theregion, the setting of the industrial sector and the setting of the energy supply system according tothe item to be examined, and then confirming the quantitative figures of the evaluation. For
example, for customers to be able to examine the contents of a contract that minimizes the runningcost in response to widely fluctuating electricity and gas rates, a quantitative evaluation can bemade by changing the rates in the setting of electricity and fuel rates and then comparing theresults. Moreover, if the customer wants to examine the cost benefit resulting from the operation ofa gas engine, examination including exhaust heat utilization for a boiler and absorption type chiller
is possible by changing the operating pattern of the gas engine in the setting of the energy supplysystem.

2.2

Comprehensive evaluation

The planning system uses Modelica language and therefore can deal with the combined areaof the heat transfer system, the electric system, the mechanical system, etc., in common(1). Inaddition, the planning system has a wide range of energy equipment models such as electric power
generation equipment including a renewable energy equipment, chillers, cogeneration systems andheat storage tanks in the equipment library, enabling the consideration of various equipment
configurations. Each equipment model contains the equipment properties including partial load andcost models such as the initial cost and maintenance cost. For this reason, the developed planningsystem can make comprehensive evaluations including cost evaluation.

2.3

Standard database

Typically, understanding and obtaining all the information necessary for examination isdifficult and simple primary evaluation is hindered in many cases. The developed planning system
has a standard database with registered data for weather information and electricity/fuel rate
systems linked with the respective region, seasonal electricity/heat demand and equipment
configurations standardized for each industrial sector, as well as typical equipment specifications.
Even when sufficient data are not available in an early examination phase, the user can promptly
execute a simple primary evaluation by using data selected from the standard database, editing thevalues set from the standard data according to the object items of the examination, or setting thevalues based on actual measured data if available.

2.4

Optimization

The developed planning system has an optimization feature that searches optimum
equipment operating procedures. With this feature, the user sets the convergence conditions andevaluation function that uses the running cost, CO2 emission amount and other parameters. Thisfeature enables the user to obtain, through calculation based on the standards set by the user,
optimum operating procedures that take into account the efficiency of various pieces of equipment,
the effective utilization of exhaust heat and other factors.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 52 No. 1 (March 2015)33|3. Process of evaluation using the developed planning system
The developed planning system displays screens that follow the process shown in Figure 2.
The user can evaluate an energy solution quickly by carrying out an evaluation process consistingof five steps in accordance with the screen flow. Each step is described below.

3.1

Setting the region

The weather conditions and electricity and fuel rates are set in this step. When the user
selects a region from the map, the standard data associated with the region can be set. The user candirectly enter values instead.

3.2

Setting the industrial sector

Electricity demand and heat demand such as chilled water, hot water, and steam are set inthis step. Similarly to 3.1, when the user selects an industrial sector, the standard data can be set,
and the user can also directly enter values instead.

3.3

Setting the energy supply system

The energy supply system is set in this step. The energy supply system must be able to be set
flexibly by simple operation because it varies for each object evaluation item. The developed
planning system utilizes a graphical schematic diagram that is easily understood visually. Inaddition, each equipment system can be set flexibly and easily on the screen with the mouse by
dragging and dropping an equipment model from the equipment library and by connecting
equipment with lines in a color exclusive for each classification such as electricity, hot water,chilled water, etc.
Similarly to 3.1 and 3.2, representative equipment system data are available in the standard
database and the user can select a schematic diagram similar to the object evaluation item from thedatabase to set the energy supply system efficiently. In addition, the operation pattern,
specifications and performance of the equipment can be set by using the standard data or enteringparameters arbitrarily instead.

3.4

Simulation and optimization

The running cost and CO2 emission amount are calculated based on the data entered by theuser in the steps above.
When the optimization of equipment operation procedures is to be executed, an evaluation
function that uses the convergence condition, the running cost, CO2 emission amount, etc., and theconvergence condition are set in this step.

3.5

Evaluation

The results calculated in 3.4 and represented in the graph are evaluated in this step. The
developed planning system displays the equipment operating pattern and the electricity-heatbalance diagram in addition to the graphs of the running cost and the CO2 emission amount, which
are indexes of the evaluation of efficient energy supply. These can be displayed for multiple cases
simultaneously and therefore the user can easily understand the quantitative values for multiple
cases.

|4. Applications
This chapter presents energy solution examination cases to which the developed planningsystem described above has been applied.

4.1

Examination of introduction of gas engine cogeneration

For an energy supply system that uses a boiler and a centrifugal chiller mainly based onelectricity purchase as shown in Figure 3, we examined the changes of the running cost due to theintroduction of a gas engine and a cogeneration system consisting of a boiler and an absorption
type chiller that are capable of utilizing the exhaust heat.
When a cogeneration system is used as in this case, the operation of the gas engine needs tobe examined based on not only a comparison between the electricity purchase expense and the fuelexpense, but also demand for steam and chilled water. In addition, there are two options for theutilization of exhaust heat from the gas engine: utilization as steam and utilization as chilled water.
Whichever is more efficient should be selected.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 52 No. 1 (March 2015)
34

Figure 3

Examination of introduction of gas engine cogeneration

Figure 4 gives the optimization results based on the electricity and heat demand, theelectricity rate and the fuel rate set in this case, using the evaluation functions of the running cost.
In this case, as represented in this figure, the running cost is minimized by an operation that uses
steam from the exhaust gas boiler for the steam supply and supplies chilled water by the centrifugal
chiller during the daytime when steam demand exists, and uses steam from the exhaust gas boiler
for the generation of chilled water at the steam charging type absorption type chiller during nighttime when no steam demand exists. In addition, the running cost, which can be reduced by theintroduction of the gas engine, and the number of years for investment recovery, which takes intoaccount the initial investment and the running cost, can be quantitatively indicated as shown inFigure 5.

Figure 4

Operation of equipment in case of introduction of gas engine cogeneration

Figure 5

Cost benefit due to introduction of gas engine cogeneration

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 52 No. 1 (March 2015)35

4.2

Examination of rate system

In addition to section 4.1, Figure 6 shows the examination results of the contract power andthe power rate system in consideration of changes in the electricity purchase amount caused by theoperation of the gas engine. From these results, it is found that the running cost may be reduced if
the contract power is changed from the current one.

Figure 6

Contract power and annual cost

|5. Conclusion
As described above, the present report presented a planning system for a large-scale energy
supply system consisting of various pieces of equipment, that enables prompt quantitativeevaluation of benefits in running cost resulting from changes of the operating procedures ofexisting equipment systems and return on investment in the introduction of a new energy supply
system and the partial replacement of existing equipment including the initial cost. The developed
planning system enables the evaluation of the optimum combination of equipment that realizes
efficient energy supply and related operation procedures.
MHI is planning future expansion of the developed planning system to include the ability toconsider the frequency fluctuation of the electric power system and dynamic delay of theequipment such as start-up time, etc. The development of the expanded model is aimed atevaluating an energy supply system capable of stably supplying energy with an eye toward energyliberalization. MHI also plans to add a function to predict energy demand changing in response tothe production plan of plants and the flow of people and products in a city, commercial facility,building, etc. Through this effort, we will establish an energy management system that responds
quickly to a momentarily changing environment and offers an optimum solution online. Theseenhancements of the developed planning system will contribute to the improvement of the energy
management platform.

Reference
1.

Fritzson,P, Principles of Object-Oriented Modeling and Simulation with Modelica 3.3: A Cyber-PhysicalApproach, Wiley-IEEE Press, 2014