Appendix 3a.2

Appendix 3a.2

3a.2.1

Non-CO2 Emissions from Drainage andRewetting of Forest Soils: Basis for Future
Methodological Development

Introduction

The drainage and rewetting of organic soils and wet mineral soils with high contents of soil organic carbon affectemissions and removals of greenhouse gases. CO2 is significantly affected, and methods for estimating changes
in emissions/removals of CO2 from these lands are discussed in the sections dealing with organic soils inSections 3.2 to 3.5.
In addition, intensively drained soils have large N2O emissions because drainage increases the aerated layer andenhances the mineralisation of soil organic matter. In contrast, unmanaged organic soils are very small naturalsources or sinks of N2O (Regina et al., 1996). The effect of drainage on N2O emissions depends upon soil
characteristics; higher emissions are associated with minerotrophic (nutrient rich) and lower emissions withombrotrophic (nutrient poor) peat types (Regina et al., 1996). Data on N2O emissions from drained organic soils
and wet mineral soils are relatively sparse and variable, so the uncertainty in the methods presented here is high.
In the following, the methodologies for N2O emissions focus on forest land not addressed in the IPCC
Guidelines. N2O emission from drained cropland and grassland soils are covered in the Agriculture Chapter of
the IPCC Guidelines and GPG2000. Given data availability and the current state of understanding, the same
method can be used for forest land remaining forest land and lands converted to forest land.
Rewetting organic soils will reduce the N2O emissions down to the original level around zero.
The CH4 emitted from undrained organic soils is a natural process and the emissions are highly variable.
Drainage of organic soils reduces these emissions and may even turn the area into a small CH4 sink (see IPCC
Guidelines, Reference Manual, Section 5.4.3, Wetland drainage). Methods for estimating the effect of drainage
or rewetting of forests and wetlands on CH4 emissions are not provided in the IPCC Guidelines nor in this reportdue to paucity of data although the magnitude of the effect, in terms of CO2-equivalent, may be large in cases inwhich high CH4 emitting areas are intensively drained. However, the effect of drainage on CH4 may be small incases a) with low natural CH4 emissions, b) in which still a shallow water table is maintained, or c) in which theCH4 sink in drained areas is compensated by CH4 emissions from drainage ditches. A default value of zero
emissions of CH4 after drainage is used in this appendix (Laine et al., 1996; Roulet and Moore, 1995).
CH4 emissions can increase in rewetted organic soils. “Rewetting” means the return of the water table to predrainage levels. If a country is rewetting organic soils, these soils are considered as managed. In this case, it isthese drainage/rewetting effects that can be reported based on country-specific data. According to literature, theCH4 source by rewetting organic soil covered by forest is estimated in a first approximation in a range of 0 to 60kg CH4 ha-1 yr-1 in temperate and boreal climate, and 280 to 1260 kg CH4 ha-1 yr-1 in tropical conditions (Bartlettand Harriss 1993). There is some evidence that CH4 emissions may still be smaller in rewetted peatlands than in
the virgin state (Komulainen et al. 1998, Tuittila et al. 2000). At present, no good practice guidance can be given
for CH4 emissions from rewetting of organic soils.

3a.2.2

Methodological Issues

3a.2.2.1 C HOICE OF METHOD
The same method is applied for forest land remaining forest land (FF) and lands converted to forest land (LF).
The decision trees presented in Section 3.1 (Figure 3.1.1 Decision tree for identification of appropriate tier-level
for land remaining in the same land-use category and Figure 3.1.2 (Decision tree for identification of appropriate
tier-level for land converted to another land-use category) can be used to identify the appropriate tier for the N2O
estimate, by considering the availability data. N2O emissions from drainage and rewetting of forest soils
contribute to the subcategory “soils” in the decision trees.
The basic method for estimating direct N2O emissions from drained forest organic soils is shown in Equation
3a.2.1. N2O emissions from rewetted forest organic soils are estimated to be at natural level, and the default is set

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.273

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidanceas zero. The equation can be applied at various levels of disaggregation depending upon data availability,
particularly with respect to the availability of country-specific emission factors.
EQUATION 3a.2.1
DIRECT N2O EMISSIONS FROM DRAINED FOREST SOILS (TIER 1)
N2O emissionsFF = ∑(AFForganic IJK • EFFFdrainage, organic IJK) + AFFmineral • EFFFdrainage, mineral • 44/28 • 10-6
Where:N2O emissionsFF=emission of N2O in units of nitrogen, kg N

AFForganic=area of drained forest organic soils, haAFFmineral=area of drained forest mineral soils, haEFFFdrainage, organic=emission factor for drained forest organic soils, kg N2O-N ha-1 yr-1

EFFFdrainage, mineral=emission factor for drained forest mineral soils, kg N2O-N ha-1 yr-1

ijk

=soil type, climate zone, intensity of drainage, etc. (depends on level ofdisaggregation)

The same method is applied to calculate N2O emissions from drained organic soils of lands converted to forest.
Tier 1: In Tier 1 Equation 3a.2.1 is applied with a simple disaggregation of drained forest soils into “nutrientrich” and “nutrient poor” areas and default emission factors are used. Default data are presented in Section
3a.2.2.2 and guidance for obtaining activity data is described in Section 3a.2.2.3.
Tier 2: Tier 2 can be used if country-specific emission factors and corresponding area data are available.
Typically, these data will enable the estimate to be disaggregated to account for management practices such asdrainage of different peatland types, fertility (e.g., bog versus fen, nitrogen status), and tree type (broadleavedversus coniferous), with specific emission factors developed for each sub-class. Adequately disaggregated area
data could be obtained from soil information in the national forest inventory.
Tier 3: If more complex models or detailed surveys are available, a national Tier 3 approach can be used toestimate N2O emissions. Given the spatial and temporal variability and uncertainty in N2O emissions, this typeof approach is most warranted in a country in which direct N2O emissions from managed forest are a key
category because applying advanced methods could more accurately represent the management practices and themost relevant driving variables.

3a.2.2.2 C HOICE OF EMISSION / REMOVAL FACTORS
Where Tiers 1 and 2 are used, emission factors for N2O emissions per unit area per year are needed.
Tier 1: Default emission factors derived from the literature are used in Tier 1, and these values are shown inTable 3a.2.1.
Due to the paucity of data, the default emission factors for the respective nutrient levels and climatic zones canbe taken as indicative only and may not properly reflect the real magnitude of emissions in a given country.
Emissions from drained forest mineral soils should be calculated by using separate and lower emission factors
than for drained forest organic soils. Emissions from drained forest mineral soils can be assumed as about a tenthof EFdrainage for organic soils (Klemedtsson et al., 2002). More measurements, especially in tropical climate, areneeded to improve the indicative emission factors of Table 3a.2.1. If drained forest is rewetted (i.e., the watertable returns to pre-drainage levels) it is assumed that N2O emissions return to the natural level close to zero.

3.274

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Appendix 3a.2

Climate Zoneand Soil TypeTABLE 3a.2.1
DEFAULT EMISSION FACTORS N2O EMISSIONS FROM DRAINAGE OF FOREST SOILS
Emission Factor
Uncertainty
EFFF
range*
Reference/ Comments
drainage-1-1
kg N2O-N ha-1 yr-1 kg N2O-N ha yr

Temperate and Boreal Climate
Nutrient Poor Organic Soil

0.1

0.02 to 0.3

Alm et al., 1999; Laine et al., 1996
Martikainen et al., 1995; Minkkinenet al., 2002: Regina et al., 1996

Nutrient Rich Organic Soil

0.60.16 to 2.4

Klemedtsson et al., 2002; Laine etal., 1996; Martikainen et al., 1995;
Minkkinen et al., 2002: Regina et al.,
1996

Mineral Soil

0.06

0.02 to 0.24

Klemedtsson et al., 2002

Tropical Climate

80 to 24

Estimated as half the factor ofdrained organic croplands* 95% confidence interval of log-normal distribution

Tier 2: When country-specific data are available, in particular for different management regimes, specificemission factors can be defined in Tier 2. These country-specific emissions should be derived from surveys
performed in the country or in comparable neighbouring countries and, if possible, disaggregated by drainage
level, vegetation (broadleaved versus coniferous) and fertility of peat. Since literature is sparse and results
sometimes contrasting, country-specific emission factors should be derived through a rigorous measurement
programme. Good practice guidance on how to derive country-specific emission factors for N2O emissions fromsoils is given in Box 4.1, Good Practice in Derivation of Country-Specific Emission Factors, Page 4.62, ofGPG2000.
Tier 3: Under Tier 3, all parameters should be country-defined using more accurate values rather than thedefaults. The literature is scarce and results sometimes contradictory and countries are therefore encouraged toderive country-specific emission factors by measurements against appropriate undrained forest sites as areference. Data should be shared between countries with similar environmental conditions.

3a.2.2.3 C HOICE OF ACTIVITY DATA
The activity data needed to estimate this source is the area of drained and rewetted forest lands. In Tier 1, thenational estimate of drained forest soils is stratified by soil fertility, since the default values are provided for
nutrient rich and nutrient poor soils. National data will be available at soil services and from wetland surveys,
e.g., for international conventions. In case no stratification by peat fertility is possible, countries may rely on
expert judgement. Boreal climates tend to promote nutrient-poor raised bogs, while temperate and oceanic
climates tend to promote the formation of nutrient-richer peatlands. Further stratification may be possible underTier 2. For example, area could also be distinguished by management practices such as drainage of different peattypes, and tree types. Chapter 2 provides guidance on the approaches available to classify land area.

3a.2.2.4 U NCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT
Estimates of anthropogenic emissions of N2O emissions from forests are highly uncertain because of: a) highspatial and temporal variability of the emissions, b) scarcity of long-term measurements and their likely nonrepresentativeness over larger regions, and c) uncertainty in spatial aggregation and uncertainty inherent to theemission factors and activity data.
Tier 1: The uncertainty associated with the Tier 1 default emission factors are shown in Table 3a.2.1.
The uncertainty in the area of forest peatlands and its division between nutrient-poor (ombrotrophic, bogs) andnutrient-rich (minerotrophic, fens) peat types is best calculated by a country-specific assessment of uncertainties.
Present estimates of areas of drained and rewetted forest peatlands within a country vary in a wide rangebetween different data sources and may have an uncertainty of 50% or more.
Tier 2: Good practice in derivation of country-specific emission factors is described in Box 4.1, Good Practicein Derivation of Country-Specific Emission Factors, Page 4.62, of GPG2000.

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.275

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

The area of forest peatlands and its division between nutrient-poor and nutrient-rich peat types needs a countryspecific assessment of uncertainties, preferably by comparing various sources of data and applying different area
statistics, e.g., in sensitivity or Monte Carlo analyses (Section 5.2, Identifying and Quantifying Uncertainties).
Tier 3: Process-based models will probably provide a more realistic estimate but need to be calibrated andvalidated against measurements. Sufficient representative measurements are needed for validation purposes.
Generic guidance on uncertainty assessment for advanced methods is given in Section 5.2, Identifying andQuantifying Uncertainties.

3a.2.3CompletenessIn order to ensure consistency with reporting on CO2 emissions from drained forest soils, please refer to Section
3.2.3 on completeness in the main text.

3a.2.3.1 D EVELOPING A CONSISTENT TIME SERIESIn order to ensure consistency with reporting on CO2 emissions from drained forest soils, please refer to Section
3.2.4 on developing a consistent time series in the main text.

3a.2.4

Reporting and Documentation

In order to ensure consistency with reporting on CO2 emissions from drained forest soils, please refer to Section
3.2.5 on reporting and documentation in the main text.

3a.2.5

Quality Assurance/ Quality Control (QA/QC)

In order to ensure consistency with reporting on CO2 emissions from drained forest soils, please refer to Section
3.2.6 on inventory quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) in the main text.

3.276

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF