Statement of Bernard Bigot
Director-General
ITER International Fusion Energy Organization
Before theSubcommittee on Energy
Committee on Science, Space and Technology
U.S House of Representatives
The ITER Project: a core element of U.S. fusion research
March 6, 2018
Thank you Chairman Weber, Ranking Member Veasey, and distinguished members of theCommittee. I am grateful for this opportunity to present to you the status of progress on the
ITER Project. I am particularly pleased to present my ITER report in the context of the overall
U.S. fusion research program, because I believe it is appropriate that ITER is understood as an
essential and integral element of U.S fusion research.

INTRODUCTION
This precise day marks exactly three years since I accepted the position of Director-General of
the ITER Organization. In March 2015, as this Committee well knows, the ITER project was inurgent need of reform. The inherent complexities built into the ITER Agreement were widely
viewed as liabilities. Much of the focus was on whether it was possible to effectively manage
such a complex international construction project.
By April 2016, when I last addressed this Committee, we had begun to answer this question
affirmatively. At that time our organizational reforms had been underway for one year, basedon an Action Plan designed to accomplish several specific objectives: effective, efficienttechnological decision-making; profound integration of the work of the ITER Organization
with that of the Domestic Agencies; a comprehensive technological understanding of all
aspects of the ITER machine; finalization of design of ITER’s critical path components; anupdated, challenging, reliable schedule; and above all, a project culture capable of reliably
delivering on our commitments while maintaining the highest levels of safety and quality.
The Committee at that time offered its congratulations for our efforts to put the project back on
track, and we were very grateful for your expressions of support. One month after that hearing,
we were also pleased to receive the report of the U.S. Secretary of Energy, which wascautiously optimistic about the ITER reforms. However, it was also clear at that stage thatsome scepticism remained as to whether we would be able to fully carry out these reforms, andeven more, whether we would be able to sustain our commitments to deliver the project inaccordance with the demands of the new ITER schedule and resource estimates.
Now, almost 2 years later, I am pleased to report that we have, in fact, remained on track forsuccess according to the agreed schedule and cost. The ITER project is a maturing enterprise.
The organizational reforms are fully in place. According to multiple external reviews that haveconsidered the performance of the ITER Project since 2015, we have established a robust
project culture, including implementing strong, effective standards for international project1

management, systems engineering, and risk management. Most significantly, we havecontinued to deliver on our construction and manufacturing commitments, in accordance withthe expected milestones, working within agreed cost constraints, and we have achieved thisperformance as a fully integrated ITER team. And further, we are committed to continuous
improvement.
Last November, the ITER project reached a significant milestone: the completion of 50 percentof the “total construction work scope through First Plasma.” This is no small achievement. It
represents the collective contribution and commitment of ITER’s seven members. So it waswith a sense of pride in that collective accomplishment, as well as a sense of deep gratitude toeach member government, that we announced this accomplishment. And we were gratified
with the attention we received in the international media: more than 750 news organizations,from printed and online articles to TV and radio channels, reported this milestone in more than
40 countries and 16 languages.
“Total construction work scope,” as used in our project performance metrics, is a start-to-finish
term. It includes design, component manufacturing, building construction, shipping anddelivery, assembly, and installation. Globally, these indicators show that the ITER project isprogressing steadily. This has not happened easily. A project of this complexity is full of risks;and our schedule to First Plasma 2025 is set with no ‘float’ or contingency. Effective risk
management is a daily discipline at ITER.
ITER’s success so far has demanded extraordinary commitment of the ITER members, highperformance project management, and almost perfect integration of our work. Our design has
taken advantage of the best expertise of every member’s scientific and industrial base. No
country, not even the most advanced, could have done this alone. We are all learning from eachother, for the world’s mutual benefit.
But to be clear: in no way are we spending time at ITER focused on self-congratulations. We
have many challenges ahead of us. We are continuing to question ourselves, to welcome
external scrutiny, and to learn and improve the way we work on multiple fronts; an expectationof constant improvement is a way of life for this exceedingly complex, first-of-a-kind machine.
Today I would like to describe some aspects of our progress in detail, illustrating the interconnectivity of our work by providing examples of recent contributions made by the U.S. andeach ITER Member. I will also explain the series of external reviews we have undergone in thepast few years, which have provided validation for our progress and continued to stimulate
improvements. With this narrative, I hope to also demonstrate the importance of ITER as an
essential element of the U.S. fusion research program.
THE ITER MISSION: collaboration on the world’s first “burning plasma” experiment
To set the stage, let me offer a few words about the ITER mission.
Fusion is the mass-to-energy conversion that occurs in the core of the Sun and all the stars. It is
the most common source of energy in the universe, and the most powerful. Every second, ourSun fuses a massive amount of hydrogen into helium and releases a huge amount of energy. It
is this fusion reaction that gives the Earth light and warmth.

2

Scientists and engineers globally have been working on the most effective way to harness
fusion for more than six decades of research. The U.S. has been a core player in every stage.
This includes the multinational fusion research program hosted in San Diego at the DIII-D
tokamak, which Dr. Mickey Wade will describe today in more detail; as well as the National
Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, to be presented by Dr. Mark
Herrmann. It also includes the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) and the National
Spherical Torus Experiment at Princeton, C-Mod at MIT, the Joint European Torus (JET) in
the United Kingdom, KSTAR in Korea, T-10 in Russia, JT-60 in Japan, EAST in China, ToreSupra or WEST in France, the ASDEX Upgrade in Germany, and many others.
From its genesis with President Reagan’s invitation in 1985 to consider a large scientificcooperative program, fusion research has been a multinational investment unlike any otherscience endeavour in history, in terms of its collaborative funding, innovation and brainpower.
Globally, fusion scientists agree that the next major step for fusion science and fusion energy is
the creation and controlled study of a “burning” or self-heating plasma: a state in which mostof the heating of the plasma is coming from the fusion reaction itself.
The Tokamak fusion reactor is the only configuration mature enough to serve as the basis for aburning plasma experiment in the next decades. In order to conduct this experiment with thevolume of fusion heating exceeding the surface losses, it must be done at industrial scale—meaning at ITER scale. Thus the ITER Tokamak is the converging next step of all of themagnetic confinement fusion research conducted by all parties, globally, since the late 1950s.
The technologies are mature, but there is still much to be gained in terms of industrial expertiseand innovation as we push the boundaries of engineering to achieve the necessary combinationof scale and precision. And once complete, ITER will enable scientists to observe for the firsttime, for a duration of several minutes and as often as needed to optimize the process, this stateof matter, a “burning plasma” with a fusion self-heating exceeding the external heating power
absorbed by the plasma.
The size and timeline of the ITER investment—as well as the past history of fusion research—makes it logical for the world’s leading industrial countries to approach this project
collaboratively. Seven members, representing 35 countries and more than 80 percent of theannual global GDP and half the world’s population, are involved in the construction of this first“star on earth.” The ITER Organization serves as owner and coordinator of the ITER facility as
well as the nuclear operator. The seven ITER Members are directly providing around 90
percent of the value in the form of procuring and delivering the millions of components thatmust fit together into a single, functional machine.
This collaboration allows us to continue to pool the best fusion science and engineering minds
from around the globe. It lowers the financial and other risks for any one member. 1 And it
enables the joint creation and acquisition of industrial capacity and expertise. The spin-off
technologies that emerge from ITER’s ground-breaking science and technological innovation
are applicable to other industries and open significant opportunities for multinational trade.
Two risks also arise from this collaborative approach. First, for an international construction
project in which each Member is procuring components that must interface perfectly together,
1

Unlike many other U.S. multinational engagements, with ITER the U.S. pays only 9.09% of the cost, with
45.46% of the burden borne by Europe. This makes ITER stand out as a highly leveraged U.S. investment.

3

we cannot allow differences of perspective or method to lead to divergent priorities or silos ofoperation. Integration is essential. Each of the ITER Members has a track record of success inhigh-tech enterprises. But each one approaches project management differently. Cultural andnational differences can lend complexities to communication, political decision-making,budgetary processes, labour practices, and other aspects. Thus the organizational complexities
built into the project structure, together with the complexities of the machine itself, must be
intelligently and carefully managed.
Second, it is absolutely vital that each Member approaches the ITER project with a sense of
pride, ownership and responsibility. ITER is an international project, but it is also in every way
a U.S. project, an experimental platform for U.S. scientists, an essential element of the U.S.
fusion research program—just as it is a European project, a Korean project, a Russian project, aproject to be owned and operated by, and for the benefit of, every ITER Member.
The ‘risk’ that arises in this collaboration is that if any ITER Member falls short in meeting its
commitments, it jeopardizes not only that country’s fusion program, but the fusion program
and roadmap of each of its partners as well.
Looking ahead, we know that we will need the continuing commitment and support of every
member to maintain the successful performance of the past 3 years. By choosing to build thismachine in an integrated way, we have made our success interdependent. A shortfall in thecommitment of any member, if it impacts the delivery of that member’s components or thecapacity of the ITER Organization to meet the machine assembly and installation schedule,
will have a cascading effect in delays and costs to all other members.

PROGRESS IN MANUFACTURING AND CONSTRUCTION
For the past 36 months, ITER has maintained a rapid pace in manufacturing and construction,in parallel with enhancement of project management. As I mentioned at the outset, we recently
passed the 50 percent mark in the completion of “total construction work scope through First
Plasma.” Using the same project performance metrics, total average component manufacturing
through First Plasma, including building construction, is assessed to be 58 percent complete.
Supported by advances in fusion technology R&D, the production of major ITER components
is in full swing. To illustrate both the interdependency of the project and the value being
contributed by all Members, I will provide a few selected examples of recent progress made byeach Domestic Agency, with a focus where relevant on components that are particularlycomplex or first-of-kind.
EuropeOn-site construction: As part of its 45.46 percent contribution to ITER, Europe is constructing
all the buildings of the ITER scientific installation. Today, the European Domestic Agency hascompleted 42 percent of work on site and signed 74 percent of work contracts.
The Tokamak Complex, incorporating the Tokamak Building, the Diagnostics Building and the
Tritium Building, is advancing rapidly (see Figures 1 and 2). The basement levels (B1, B2) aswell as the three above-ground levels (L1, L2, L3) of the Tokamak Building and bio-shield arecomplete. The Diagnostics Building is also nearing completion; whereas the Tritium Building,4which is not needed for First Plasma, is currently at the L2 level. Multiple drain tanks havebeen installed, the first such equipment in the multi-year installation of tokamak and plantsystems. The Assembly Building is complete and was turned over for use last year, andinstallation of the massive Sub-Sector Assembly Tools, manufactured by Korea, is fully
underway.

FIG. 1: A view of the Tokamak Complex with theAssembly Hall to the back. The Tokamak Pit is in thecentre, the Tritium Building on the left and the
Diagnostics Building on the right.

FIG. 2: The bioshield is now finalized. Openings in
the wall are for cryostat bellows that will connect themachine to the port cells to give access to systems
such as remote handling, heating and diagnostics.

Figures 3 and 4 provide an overview of the change in the worksite from February 2015 toJanuary 2018. As these photos illustrate, overall construction has been progressing rapidly,
including the ancillary buildings and structures such as the Radiofrequency Heating Building,
the Cryogenics Building, and the Magnetic Power Conversion Buildings, as well as theassociated civil works and infrastructure elements.
CryostatWorkshop

PF Coils
Fabrication
FacilityRF
Heating

Assembly Hall

Electrical
Switchyard

Cryoplant

Tritium
Plant

MagnetConversion
Facility

Tokamak Pit
Diagnostics
Building

FIG. 3: The ITER worksite in February 2015.

FIG. 4: The ITER worksite in January 2018.

First toroidal field magnet core: Inside the metal torus or donut-shaped vacuum vessel of the
ITER Tokamak will be a second, invisible cage created by magnetic fields. These powerfulelectromagnets will keep the heated plasma in circulation away from the walls. Eighteen ofthese magnets, called toroidal field magnets, will be integrated around the vacuum vessel.
These magnets are being manufactured both in Europe and Japan, using superconductors fromsix of the ITER Members, including the United States. The first of Europe’s toroidal fieldmagnet cores, called a “winding pack” and weighing 110 tons, was completed by the ASG
consortium in April 2017 in La Spezia, Italy (see Figure 6).
The magnet core has now been delivered to Italy’s SIMIC, the company that will complete
cold tests and insert the magnet core into its final case. The completed magnet will then bedelivered to the ITER site.
5

Negative ion beam source: Three systems will be used to heat the hydrogen plasma to 150
million °C, the temperature needed for fusion. The “neutral beam” system will provide morethan half the heating for the plasma by injecting two high-energy particle beams of 16.5
megawatts (MW) each into the tokamak vacuum vessel.
The circumference of each particle beam is about 2.5 meters, greatly exceeding the size ofprevious beams, which had circumference of a dinner plate and a fraction of the power. The
size of ITER requires thicker particle beams and faster individual particles in order to penetrate
the plasma deeply enough to contribute to its heating. In addition, new high-energy negative
ion source technology must be used, instead of the positive ion source technology used in pastmachines. Years of research have gone into the optimization of these ion sources.
In November 2017, Europe successfully delivered a negative ion source to the SPIDER test bedof the Neutral Beam Test Facility in Padua, Italy. Here the critical components of the system
will be tested in advance, before transfer and installation at ITER. Europe, Japan and India are
all contributing components. The SPIDER facility will be ready for commissioning later thismonth.
First cryopump: Six of ITER’s cryopumps will maintain an ultra-high vacuum in the 1,400
cubic meter vacuum vessel where fusion takes place. The cryopumps will trap particles on
charcoal-coated panels and extract helium ash from the fusion reaction. Each cryopump will
weigh 8 tons and stand 3.4 meters tall. Two additional cryopumps will maintain a lighter
vacuum in the cryostat, the 8,500 cubic meter chamber that will house the entire tokamak.
After 10 years of intensive R&D in Europe involving 15 high-tech companies—plus four yearsof fabrication by Germany’s Research Instruments and France’s Alsyom—the first cryopump
was delivered to ITER for testing on 22 August 2017 (see Figure 5). Following mechanicaltesting at ITER and cryogenic testing at Germany’s Karlsruhe Institute of Technology,
fabrication of the additional cryopumps will follow.

FIG. 5: The pre-production cryopump was delivered inAugust 2017. More than 15 companies in Europe wereinvolved in its manufacturing.

FIG. 6: The first toroidal field coil winding pack – the110-ton inner core of ITER's TF Coils – wascompleted in April 2017.

China
Magnet feeders: ITER’s magnet feeders will relay electrical power, cryogenic fluids andinstrumentation cables from outside the machine into the superconducting magnets, crossing
the warm/cold barrier of the machine. These complex systems are equipped with independentcryostats and thermal shields and packed with a large number of advanced technology
6components such as the high-temperature superconductor current leads, cryogenic valves,superconducting busbars, and high-voltage instrumentation hardware. They will be among thefirst components installed.
China is supplying all 31 feeders. The first feeder arrived in France in October 2017.
Correction coils: The correction coils are ITER’s smallest superconducting magnets.
Weighing no more than 4.5 tons each, they are delicate by ITER standards, much thinner andlighter than the massive toroidal field and poloidal field magnets. Yet their role is vital: to finetune the magnetic fields to offset any imperfections in the position and geometry of the main
magnets.
China is producing these magnets. Eighteen superconducting correction coils will be
distributed around the ITER Tokamak at three levels. Qualification activities have been
completed and production is underway on the first coils and cases (see Figure 7).
Electrical conversion components: In addition to the steady state network that will supply
electricity to buildings and auxiliary systems, ITER will operate a pulsed power electrical
network (PPEN) to deliver power to the magnet coils and the heating and current drive systems
during plasma pulses. In mid-2017, China delivered the last of the PPEN voltage transformers;
and in October, China delivered four 128-ton converter-transformers for the magnet power
conversion system.

FIG. 7: This full-scale side correction coil prototype
was used to qualify winding and impregnation
manufacturing steps at ASIPP in Hefei, China.

FIG. 8: The ITER scale is apparent in the Cryostat
Workshop, where Larsen & Toubro is supervising theassembly and welding of the lower cylinder.

India
Cryostat assembly underway: The 3,800-ton ITER cryostat will be the largest stainless steel
vacuum chamber in the world. It will encase the entire vacuum vessel and all thesuperconducting magnets, ensuring an ultra-cool, protective environment. India is
manufacturing the cryostat, but it is far too massive to be shipped as a whole. Steel segments
have been precision-fabricated by Larsen & Toubro in India and transported by sea to
Marseille. About half of the cryostat pieces have been shipped so far. At the ITER worksite, theIndian Domestic Agency is supervising a team of German welders in the final fabrication of thefirst two sections—the base and lower cylinder (see Figure 8). Welding operations on the7second tier of the lower cylinder should be complete by the end of this month, and the wholeassembly (tiers one and two) is expected to be ready for factory acceptance testing in June.
The cryostat base, at 1,250 tons, will be among the heaviest single loads of machine assembly.
It will also be the first major component installed.
Cryoline piping: More than five kilometers of “cryoline” piping will be used to delivercryogenic cooling fluids—liquid helium and liquid nitrogen—to ITER components. Thesecryolines will travel along an elevated bridge from the cryoplant to the Tokamak Building.
From there, the distributed cryoline network will cool the ITER magnets, thermal shield, andcryopumps. The first batch of cryolines was shipped from India to ITER in June 2017.
Japan
Toroidal field coil magnets and cases: Japan has the responsibility for making 9 of ITER’s 19
toroidal field coil magnets, as well as all of the cases for these magnets. Japan’s first toroidal
field winding pack was realized in 2017 by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd/Mitsubishi
Electric Co; a second is underway at Keihin Product Operations/Toshiba Corp.
The steel cases are being made in segments at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in Futumi, Japan,
with some parts contracted to Hyundai Heavy Industries in Ulsan, Korea. They constitute themain structural element of the magnet system—not only encasing the winding packs that makeup the core of the toroidal field magnets, but also anchoring the poloidal field coils, central
solenoid and correction coils.
In December, the first toroidal field coil case successfully passed all fitting tests. The two sidesof this huge component—as tall as a four-storey building and machined from 20-centimeterthick steel—were matched within gap tolerances of 0.25 mm to 0.75 mm, an accuracy of morethan one order of magnitude in relation to conventional high-precision welded structures ofcomparable size. The case was then shipped to SIMIC in Italy, where the first European
winding pack (as mentioned above) has been delivered for insertion.

FIG. 9: This toroidal field coil case was
manufactured by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
and Hyundai Heavy Industries, in 2 pieces.

FIG. 10: As of late 2017, Japan has completed the delivery of all
niobium-tin superconducting cable to the U.S. for incorporation
into the Central Solenoid.

8Superconductor for the central solenoid: The central solenoid, the gigantic pillar at the coreof the ITER Tokamak, is being built in southern California. But the production of 43
kilometers (745 tons) of special niobium-tin (Nb3Sn) superconductor that will make up thismagnet is the sole responsibility of Japan. In late 2017, Japan completed a major milestone (seeFigure 10), shipping the last of this material to the U.S., where it is being wound into themodular coils that make up the central solenoid magnet.
Korea
Vacuum vessel fabrication: The ITER vacuum vessel, a donut-shaped stainless steel chamber
heavier than the Eiffel Tower and more than 10 times larger than the next largest tokamak, isbeing built in nine pieces, like sections of an orange. Each 40° sector is a double walled steel
component weighing 500 tons and measuring 12 meters in height and 7 meters in width, withmultiple port openings and in-wall shielding contained within its walls in the form of modular
blocks. Europe is building five sections, and Korea four. Russia is fabricating the upper ports,
and India is making the in-wall shielding.
Korea has recently completed the first segment of vacuum vessel sector #6 on schedule,
including non-destructive examination and dimensional measurements (see Figure 11). Sector#1 is nearly half complete, and sector #8 is well underway.

FIG. 11: Korea is nearing completion of the vacuum
vessel sector #6. Each sector is made up of four
segments. Pictured here is poloidal segment 2.

FIG. 12: The 850-ton thermal shield, made up of 600
components that range from a few hundred kilos toapproximately 10 tons, is in mass production in Korea.

Giant assembly tools to pre-assemble the vacuum vessel: The tools ITER will use toassemble the vacuum vessel sectors are truly colossal: six stories high with “wings” that spread
20 meters. Each tool weighs 800 tons. Each is strong enough to hold a 440-ton vacuum vessel
sector and two 310-ton toroidal field magnets in its arms, bringing them together to make a
unit.
Two of these “sector sub-assembly tools” (SSATs) will work side-by-side in the 60-meter-high
ITER Assembly Hall. They will pre-assemble the nine sectors of the vacuum vessel with othercomponents before their transfer to the Tokamak Pit, where they will be welded together toform the ITER vacuum chamber.
Korea delivered the first SSAT to ITER in batches in mid-2017. It is currently being erected in
the Assembly Hall. A second, identical, tool is under fabrication in Korea.
9Thermal shield: Since ITER’s superconducting magnets must be cooled to minus 269°C, theymust be heavily protected from any heat source. The toroidal field magnets, which surround thevacuum chamber, require a special high-tech thermal shield: stainless steel electroplated insilver. At SFA Engineering Corporation in Changwon, Korea, the fabrication of the ITER
thermal shield is now in mass production (see Figure 12).
RussiaPoloidal field coil #1: Six ring-shaped poloidal field coil magnets will encircle the ITER
machine to shape the plasma and contribute to its stability by “pinching” it away from thevacuum vessel walls. Poloidal field coil #1 (PF1) is being built at the Srednenevsky
Shipbuilding Plant in Saint Petersburg, Russia (see Figure 13). Specialists from the Efremov
Institute and other Russian experts are winding niobium-titanium superconductor material into
flat “pancakes.” The fifth of eight pancakes that will make up the PF1 magnet is now being
wound. The final PF1 magnet, which will weigh 300 tons, will be shipped to ITER andinstalled at the top of the machine.
Poloidal field coil #6 is also well underway in Hefei, China. The remaining four coils, which
will be too large to ship, are being manufactured on the ITER site by the European Domestic
Agency.
First completed port stub extension for vacuum vessel: As mentioned earlier, the ITER
vacuum vessel, where the fusion reaction occurs, will be encased in a second, much larger
vessel, the cryostat. Each of the vacuum vessel’s 44 openings will have custom-made“extensions” to create the junction to the cryostat. The upper-level ports are being built in
Russia. While the extension pieces are small in relation to the vacuum vessel, they are stillquite sizable. Port stub extension (PSE) #12, for example, weighs more than 17 tons, covers an
opening of 4 meters x 2.5 meters, and is 3.4 meters in length. In November 2017, Russia
completed PSE #12 and shipped it to Korea, where it will be welded onto its vacuum vessel
sector.

FIG. 13: This double pancake for poloidal field coil #1
in Russia was the first ITER pancake wound following
qualification; it has now completed vacuum pressure
impregnation to create a rigid assembly.

FIG. 14: General Atomics is fabricating the 1000-ton
Central Solenoid. Pictured is the first production
module. Each module requires approximately 6,000
meters of niobium-tin (Nb3Sn) conductor.

Power supply and magnet protection system: Russia is responsible for a wide variety ofelectro-technical components that make up the switching networks, fast discharge units, DC
10busbars and instrumentation procurement package. Manufacturing is underway now on thebusbars and switching network resistors; and the R&D program is concluding for the fast
discharge unit components.
United States
Central solenoid: In Poway, California, General Atomics is creating the ITER central
solenoid, a pillar-like magnet standing 18 meters tall, sometimes called “the beating heart of
ITER.” The central solenoid is made up of six individual coils, each made from approximately
6,000 meters of niobium-tin (Nb3Sn) conductor fabricated in Japan (see Figure 14). The central
solenoid will be among the most powerful electromagnets ever built, strong enough to lift anaircraft carrier. Its maximum magnetic field will be 13 Tesla, equivalent to 280,000 times themagnetic field of the Earth.
The first of the seven central solenoid production coils is now 80 percent complete, with othercoils also in fabrication.
U.S. completes electrical deliveries: The U.S. has completed its contribution to ITER’s steadystate electrical network (SSEN), which will power the pumps and other non-pulsed auxiliaryloads of the ITER facility. The 35th and final shipment of equipment arrived at the ITER site in
October 2016 (see Figure 15). The global procurement was managed by Princeton Plasma
Physics Laboratory. The U.S. is supplying 75 percent of SSEN components; with Europe
supplying the remaining 25 percent.

FIG. 15: The U.S. has completed a $34 million,
5-year project to provide 75% of components
for the steady-state electrical network at ITER.

FIG. 16: Fabrication of Tokamak Cooling Water System piping
is underway at Schulz Xtruded Products in Robinsville andHernando, Mississippi. A total of 36 kilometers of nuclear
grade stainless steel piping is needed.

U.S. completes Toroidal Field conductor deliveries: The U.S. has completed a $73 million
project to complete its contribution to ITER’s Toroidal Field system, providing more than 40
tons (4 miles) of superconductor to Europe for its incorporation in toroidal field coils. At theheight of fabrication, U.S. vendors Luvata and Oxford Superconducting Technologies were
each producing more than five metric tons of superconducting strand per month. Before ITER,
worldwide production of this wire was 20 metric tons a year.
Tokamak cooling water system: The Tokamak cooling water system will absorb the heatproduced by the ITER fusion reaction. More than 36 kilometers of nuclear-grade stainless steel
piping for the system is being fabricated in Robinsville and Hernando, Mississippi (see Figure16).
11

In October, the final design review was completed for the entire system—which means that
more orders for high-tech equipment need to be placed soon.
Additional U.S. procurements: Several other key components also have to be procured by the
U.S.: 4 diagnostic port plugs and 7 instrumentation systems (Core Imaging X-ray
Spectrometer, Electron Cyclotron Emission Radiometer, Low Field Side Reflectometer,
Motional Stark Effect Polarimeter, Residual Gas Analyzer, Toroidal Interferometer/
Polarimeter, and Upper IR/Visible Cameras); Electron Cyclotron Heating Transmission Lines(approximately 4 km of aluminum waveguide lines—24 lines—capable of transmitting up to
1.5 megawatts per line); Ion Cyclotron Heating Transmission Lines (approximately 1.5 km of
coaxial transmission lines—8 lines—capable of transmitting up to 6 megawatts per line); thePellet Injection System, an injector system capable of delivering deuterium/tritium fuel pellets
up to 16 times per second; Vacuum Roughing Pumps, a matrix of pump trains consisting ofapproximately 400 vacuum pumps; the Vacuum Auxiliary System (vacuum systemcomponents including valves, pipe manifolds, auxiliary pumps, etc., and approximately 6 km
of vacuum piping); and the Tokamak Exhaust Processing System, an exhaust separation system
for hydrogen isotopes and non-hydrogen gases.
Summary of progress: an integrated project
The foregoing is only a sampling of the activity currently underway worldwide, as all ITER
Members work to the same integrated schedule, fabricating their components for this intricate
and interdependent project. This interdependence will become still more apparent this year, as
the final preparations for the Assembly Phase are made and assembly contracts are placed. It
will escalate even more sharply in 2019, when full-paced machine assembly gets underway andeach component must be available in a precisely orchestrated sequence.

INTERNATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT: staying on track for success
To have confidence that the ITER Project is on track for success requires an understanding of
the organizational reforms we put in place starting three years ago, the external validation of
those reforms, and our performance in relation to agreed milestones.
Initial reforms: In early March 2015, when I took over as ITER Director-General, theorganizational deficiencies and management shortcomings of the project were well understood,
based on a probing and critical 2013 Management Assessment led by the American expert Bill
Madia of Stanford University. The pace of improvement immediately following the 2013
report, however, remained unsatisfactory. My agreement to take on the role of DirectorGeneral, after extensive consultation, was contingent on the acceptance by all ITER Membersof the Action Plan I mentioned in my introduction today, which I proposed at the time as theway to get the project back on track.
The positive impacts of the Action Plan were rapidly evident. The ITER reorganization that
followed created a structure, decision-making protocol, and modes of interaction more suited tothis complex, first-of-a-kind project. The Executive Project Board, made up of myself, my two
deputies, and the heads of each of the seven Domestic Agencies, has proven effective inresolving the technical questions that arise naturally at the interface of the ITER systems andcomponents contributed by each Member. The Reserve Fund we set up remains an efficientmechanism for financing timely adjustments to the design where necessary. The design
12finalization for critical path components has been a vital step to prevent further delays and cost
overruns. And cross-organizational Project Teams, including all relevant actors in a single
entity, have been used to guide progress on the most critical project elements.
By late 2015, after eight months of exhaustive technical analysis and consultation with
Domestic Agencies and suppliers, we had successfully compiled a fully integrated schedulewith associated resource projections. The cost increases and longer timeline of the newschedule were, in retrospect, inevitable: because previous schedules and cost estimates had
been based more on externally imposed conditions rather than on a realistic technological basis
and an integration of Members’ constraints. The “Best Technically Achievable Schedule” we
presented to the ITER Council in November 2015 reflected a comprehensive understanding ofa machine with more than 1 million components and correspondingly complex manufacturing,
construction and assembly sequences. The integrated analysis that led to this schedule was theessential foundation to give confidence that the ITER Project would be able to progress
forward on a realistic and reliable basis, if all Members continued to meet their commitments.
The ITER Council at that time acknowledged the much-improved understanding of project
scope, sequencing, risks, and costs achieved by this systematic review. It expressed
appreciation for the tangible progress in construction and manufacturing. And it called for an
independent review of the overall proposed schedule and associated resource estimates, tovalidate our methodology and analysis, to suggest adjustments and improvements where
warranted, and if possible to identify additional measures for consolidating and expediting theschedule and reducing costs.
External review and validation: In April 2016, when I appeared before this Committee, we
had just received the report of the independent ITER Council Review Group, the first time ourefforts had received an intensive review by an external body. The Review Group, consisting of
14 international experts, had as chartered conducted a thorough examination of our proposedschedule and resource estimates, and found both to be credible and realistic—althoughextremely challenging. Based on an intensive drill-down into the project details, they also
reported that the project reform efforts had resulted in “substantial improvement in project
performance, a high degree of motivation, and considerable progress.” They found thatcollaboration between the ITER Organization and the Domestic Agencies had markedly
improved, but still called for “further strengthening” of these internal relationships in a “cultureof collaboration”—a recommendation that, as you have seen, we wholeheartedly embraced.
One month later, we received a second significant element of external validation, when the
Secretary of Energy reported to Congress with positive statements regarding progress of the
project. The Secretary concluded that “ITER remains the best candidate today to demonstrateburning plasma, which is a necessary precursor to demonstrating fusion energy power.” The
Secretary recommended that the U.S. should remain a partner in the project through FY 2018,
but should re-evaluate continued participation prior to the FY 2019 budget submittal.
While as I noted earlier we believe strongly that continued U.S. participation is in the mutualinterest of both ITER and the United States, we welcomed this continued scrutiny of project
performance. Since that time, we have had regular semi-annual independent reviews by someof the leading world experts on topical issues. In June 2017, we received the report of an
independent review of ITER’s approach to Risk Analysis and Risk Management. In November
2017, a second review was completed focused on our processes for defining and freezing the13design interfaces of the systems, structures and components required for First Plasma. The
latest Management Assessment, led by Japan, was also completed in 2017.
Both the Risk Management and Interface Freezing reviews have compared the ITER Project toindustry standards, recognized best practices, and best available techniques—while also
accounting for ITER’s first-of-a-kind nature, which in some cases requires even moresophisticated measures than in past industrial projects. Each of these reviews, as well as the2017 Management Assessment, has validated ITER’s progress and approaches to criticalaspects of project management, finding that the project is well-managed, to the best industry
standards. Each external assessment and review has also helped us to identify additional
refinements of our methods. A new semi-annual external review has begun recently, focusedon Configuration Management, and we look forward to receiving the results of that review inthe coming months.
Project management and the achievement of a project culture: Changing the culture of a
project does not occur overnight. At ITER it has taken us more than two years, and we havecontinued a rigorous emphasis on self-examination and ongoing improvement. To solidify thegains we made during project reforms, we have emphasized a disciplined approach to applying
the best principles of international project management, risk management, systems engineering,and ultimately nuclear safety culture and project culture. Adhering to the revised schedule has
not in any sense been automatic or easy; it has required a systematic anticipation and mitigationof risks as well as day-by-day integration and teamwork. Developing and implementing an
Earned Value Management system has been a key asset in this regard. And the incorporation ofrecognized systems engineering best practices has improved the rigor of verifying andvalidating that safety, quality, and technical performance criteria are incorporated across thefull spectrum of construction and manufacturing activities.
Performance to agreed milestones: In November 2015, when we first presented our proposedschedule through First Plasma in 2025, the ITER Council emphasized the importance of
maintaining rapid momentum in construction and manufacturing even while external reviews
and validation processes were ongoing. For this reason, the Council approved the proposedschedule for 2016-17, together with a set of 29 well-defined technical and organizational
milestones covering this two-year period, referenced to this schedule and the hierarchy ofassociated project activities. These milestones could be used to monitor our ongoing reliability
and progress; if achieved successfully and on time, it would demonstrate that the ITER Project
was keeping pace.
A full set of additional milestones have since been formulated covering the entire period
through the realization of First Plasma in 2025. I am pleased to report that, to date, 31
milestones have been successfully achieved. Two of the milestones for 2016-17, both related tocivil works in the Tokamak Building, have been decided to be postponed several months ago;
in both cases, scheduling sequences have been re-adjusted and mitigation measures put in place
to ensure this slippage will not affect the overall schedule. All aspects of the critical pathschedule remain on track.
These positive results should in no way be taken for granted; they represent collective effort
and teamwork across all project partners, including supplier companies and laboratories. While
we have experienced challenges and potential delays with individual milestones, we have ineach case mitigated those challenges, offset or reduced the risk of delays and gotten back on
track. Overall, so far, there has been no slippage whatsoever in the reference schedule. This14

reflects substantial improvements in our collective capacity for anticipating and mitigating
emergent risks.
Establishing an updated baseline: Following our initial November 2015 presentation of therevised schedule through First Plasma, the ITER Council asked us to initiate a further series of
discussions with all ITER Members. The intent was to incorporate the proposed schedule andresource projections into an agreed overall project baseline that would extend through
Deuterium-Tritium (DT) full fusion power operation. These discussions were needed toconsider the priorities and resource constraints of ITER Member governments, as well as the
manufacturing schedules and the interfaces of each Member’s in-kind contributions.
The culmination of this schedule iteration was reached one year later, in November 2016, whenthe ITER Council approved the Overall Project Schedule through First Plasma in 2025 andonward to Deuterium-Tritium (DT) full fusion power operation in 2035. The associated Overall
Project Cost was approved ad referendum, meaning that it required final consideration by
ITER Member governments. For the United States, the Department of Energy subsequently
approved the Overall Project Cost in January 2017.

Figure 17: Schematic of the 4-stage strategy from First Plasma to DT operation within the revised ITER baseline.

Putting all of these elements together into an Updated Project Baseline represents a pivotal
project-wide achievement, once again requiring integration and teamwork to accommodate theresource constraints of all ITER Members. The result, as depicted in Figure 17, is a ‘staged
approach’ between First Plasma and Deuterium-Tritium Operation.
The staged approach envisages several assembly phases and plasma operation campaigns, in
keeping with when ITER Members will be in a position to deliver the associated equipment. In
advance of First Plasma, the core tokamak systems will be assembled with the necessary
auxiliary systems (heating and current drive (H&CD), diagnostics, fuelling) required to support
plasma breakdown. This is consistent with First Plasma as a demonstration of the successful
integration of the tokamak core and principal plant systems (power supplies, cooling,
cryogenics, vacuum, etc.) and will conclude the first phase of integrated commissioning of the
ITER facility.
Subsequently, the magnet systems will be commissioned to full current, and the full set of invessel components (including shielding blanket, first wall and divertor) will be installed,
together with an expanded subset of the heating and current drive and diagnostic capability.
The first physics experiment is planned in December 2028. Two periods of experimental
operation with hydrogen and helium plasmas will follow, with a 3rd assembly period tocomplete the H&CD systems and most of the remaining diagnostic capability. These two15

experimental periods will commission all tokamak and auxiliary systems with plasma, and will
demonstrate full technical performance of the ITER device before the transition to D and DT
operation in the 4th stage of the experimental program.

CONCLUSIONAt the ITER Organization, we are committed to ensuring the delivery of the ITER machine ontime and the full achievement of the associated scientific and technological benefits, as thelaunching pad for the eventual commercial deployment of fusion-generated electricity. We arecommitted to delivering the project in a manner that lives up to the trust placed in us by all
ITER Members. We are committed to continuous improvement, to make ITER the model forinternational collaboration on complex science and technology challenges. And we arecommitted to making ITER a sound investment for the U.S., as for all our partners. These
commitments require that all of the seven ITER partners fulfil their own commitments towards
the ITER project by providing the needed resources on time (staff, in-kind components and incash contribution). This year is critical on this point, since some Members seem not prepared to
do so for the first time. We look forward to a long and fruitful collaboration.
Thank you for this opportunity.

16