平成 28 年度日欧共同公募委託研究（第 3 弾）終了レビュー評価結果（概要）（研究期間平成 28 年度～令和元年度）

研究開発課題名

受託者（共同研究者）

採択番号 19201
高齢者の活動的・健康的な生活を実現するための欧州との連携によるネットワークプラットフォーム基盤技術の研究開発
副題
アジャイル型共創による高齢者補助ロボット用ネットワー
クプラットフォーム技術の研究開発
Acronym ACCRA

国立大学法人京都大学（国立大学法人神戸大学、株式会社コネクトドット）（Trialog（フランス）、Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna（イタリア）、Erasmus University Rotterdam（オランダ）、Paris DauphineUniversity（フランス）、Blue Frog Robotics（フランス）、IRCCS - Fondazione Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza（イタリア））

評価※

Project has fully achieved its objectives and milestones for the period.

主な評
価コメン
トOverall, the project has ambitious scientific and technological objectives and the progress reported justifies this ambition. The team has made great effort andachievements. The project is a joint European-Japanese initiative including a multidisciplinary team of European and Japanese partners. The obtained results
showed an efficient and synergistic collaboration between Europe and Japan, which has delivered relevant new results.
The project develops and utilizes the methodology of agile co-creation which includes needs assessment, co-creation phase, experimentation andsustainability analysis. This agile co-creation process is applied iteratively to each application deployment.
The ACCRA solution accounts for different cultures across the EU and Japan and also a variety of individual preferences. The different applications havebeen co-created in different countries: Mobility Walking in Italy and The Netherlands, Daily Life in France and The Netherlands and Conversation
rehabilitation in Italy and Japan.
With regard to the experimentation in pilot sites, partners delivered the study on the three sites. The detailed information obtained provided lessons to belearned and recommendations for future experimentations with robotic solutions not only from a technical, but also from an organizational and methodologicalpoint of view. They could have used the comparative resources available through the detailed documentation of each case to reflect on the culturaldifferences and how these matter regarding the expectations towards and potential future use of robots. This is particular importance, as a wider use of thistechnology might need to offer context-sensitive specificities. Much interesting information has been collected in particular on the usage of the robot toprevent falls in the elderly population and in daily life activities.
The dissemination activities of the project were very well performed on all scales, scientific dissemination, participation to conferences, academic and beyond,outreach events, awards and further more. Even a number of post-project dissemination activities are scheduled.
The quality and effectiveness of the project management is good. No particular problems related to the project were reported. Almost all the deliverables wereachieved within initial timelines without significant delays or negative impact on the overall progress of the work.

※評価
ランク表

(1) Project has fully achieved its objectives and milestones for the period.
(2) Project has achieved most of its objectives and milestones for the period with relatively minor deviations.
(3) Project has achieved some of its objectives and milestones; however, corrective action will be required.
(4) Project has failed to achieve critical objectives and/or milestones and/or is severely delayed.