126

Dispute Settlement,

127

(128

(2)

Centre for Settlement of Investｭ
ment Disputes,
Court of Arｭ
bitration, PCA)

Chamber of Commerce,
Chamber of Commerce,

129

130

131

Draft Convention of the Protection of Foreign

132.
v)

0(2)
Generale de Surveillance (SGS)inｭ
spectionS G S v.

133v.

v.

134obligation)

obligation)S G S v.

constantly
commitments it

shallinto withrany obligation it has assumed with regard co specific investments in its territoryS G S v.

135

shall obｭ

136v.

C v.

137(ISO$)

138

2014(1}139

100and Ta/ta v.

140

I C M E v.

(2)

Lauder/Lauder I C M E v.

S.

European Deｭvelopment Corporation G m b H (EuropeanTelevision 21 (C E T
CEDC, C E Tof Association and Inｭvestment Agreement,

Nezavisca Teleｭ

vizni Spolecnost (T V

Media Enterprise B. V. (C M E

CET

141

CET

CET
use of theuse of the know‑how of the

CET21

CNTS, C M E , C E T

CME,21,

CET

CET

142

alibiofLauder v.

C M E v.

v.

143

Court ofLauderv.

(identicalof acｭ

economic

144

alibi pendem)

cause of

145

Lauder I C M E v.

alibi pendens)

judicata)

146

alibi

Bibliography on Investment L a w and Procedure I ICSID at hctps://icsid.worldbank.org/resources/databases/bibliography‑on‑invescmenc‑law‑and‑procedure, Foreign Direct Investment‑ Research Guide International L a w IPeace Palace Library at

147

2010
Investment Agreeｭ(2)

mencs)(3)

Discussion Paper Series 05‑J‑021
Multiplehland, The Coodination ofHannno Weｭ

Proceedings in Investment Treaty Arbitration (Oxford Uniｭ

versity Press, 2013) ,Giovanni Zarra, Para/le/Arbitration (Eleven Inｭternational Publisihing, 2017).

(5)

(7)

RIETI Discussion Paper Series(9)

Court of Incernational Arbitration,

148

ICSIDPCA,(Moscowof Commerce and Industry) ,gional Center for International Commercial Arbitration),
ternational Arbitration(Cairo Reｭ
(Hong Kong Inｭ
Disｭ

puce Settlement Navigator IU N C T A D Investment Policy H u b atunctad.org/investment‑dispute‑setdement(11)

O E C D , Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property (1966), Art. 2 Each
Party shall at all times ensure the observance of undertakings given by it in relation to propｭerty of nationals of any other Party.

(14) Anthony C. Sinclair,,“ The Origins of the Umbrella Clause in the International L a w of Inｭvestment Protection ”, Arbitration International, vol.20 (2004), p.

179‑217v. Argentina, ICSID Case No.ARB/97/3, Decision on Annulment, 3 July 2002,

para. 96.

149

also, Prosper Weil, "Probｭ

RIETI Discussion Paper Series 08‑J‑014

entre un Ecat et un parciculier", Recueil des Cours, vol.128
pp.

p. 130.

supra note 4, pp.

HannnoGiovanni Zarra, supra note 4, pp.

Generate de Surveillance v. Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13, Decision on Jurisｭ
diction, 6para. 17.

Ibid., paras.
para. 168.
paras.
para. 168.
Letter of the Swiss Secretariat for Economic Affairs co the ICSID Deputy Secreｭtary‑General dated October l,2003, published in Mealey's International(2004) p. 19, cited in Emmanuel Gaillard,“ Investment

E3

Arbitration and Jurisdiction

Weiler, T. ed. International Investment

over Contract Claims: The S G S Cases

Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases form the ICS/D, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary
Intetnaional Law (Cameron May,pp.

at pp.

S G S v. Phili>,pines,ICSID Case No.ARB/02/6, Decision onJanuary 2004.

Ibid,Ibid.,123
para. 127.
137.

co Jurisdiction, 29

150
v. Argentina, supra note 11, para. 98.
SGSv.

23, paras. 154‑155.

v.

ICSID Case No.ARB/02/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 November 2004,

Eureko v. Poland, A d H o c Arbitration, Panial Award, 19 August 2005, Noble ~ntures v. Romaｭnia, ICSID Case No.ARB/01/11, Award of 12 Octoberv. Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Award on Jurisdiction, 6 August 2004,C M S v. Argentina, ICSID Case No.ARB/01/8, Award of 12 M a y 2005, El Paso Energy v. Arｭgentina, ICSID Caseon Jurisdiction, 27 April 2006, Pan American

Energy .v Argentina, ICSID Case No.ARB/03/13, Decision on Preliminary Objections, 27July

Walde,“ The ‘Umbrella’ Clause inInvestment

vol.6 (2005), pp.

(Emmanuel Gaillard,“ Centre international pour lerelacifs

vestissemencs (CIRDI) : Chronique des sentences

du droit international,

2007, pp.

. Poland, supra note 37, S.G.S. .v
v

Case No. ARB/07/29, Malicorp

ICSID Case No.ARB/08/18.

B. V. v Paraguay. ICSID Case No.ARB/07/9, Decision oftions to Jurisdiction, 29 M a y 2009.

RIETI Discussion Paper Series

una via, non datur recursus adon Objecｭ

151

Wehland, supra note 4, pp. 28‑39, Giovanni Zarra, supra note 4, pp.
treaty shopping)
Jorun Baumgartner, Treaty

Investment L a w (Oxｭ

ford University Press, 2017).

'50)
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 08‑J‑011

and Ta/ta(51)

ICSID Case No.ARB/11/26.

Discussion Paper Series

S. Lauder v. Czech, U N C I T R A L , Final Award, 3 September 200 l,
U N C I T R A L , Partial Award, 13 September 2001, Final Award, 14 March 2003.

S. Lauder v. Czech, supra note 45,para. 171.
paras. 172‑173.
57)

Ibid, para. 177.
para. 178.

'59)

Ibid., para. 230.
Ibid.,

236‑314.
para. 235.
Partial Award, supra note 45, para. 410.

(63)

Ibid., para. 412.

(64)

Ibid., para. 412.
para. 419.
of Arbicral Award (judgement of S V E A Court of15

152
May 2003.
(61) Ibid., pp. 95‑96.

pp.
Final Award, supra note 45, paras. 432‑437.
Wehland, supra note 4, pp.

Giovanni Zarra, supra note 4, pp.