The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction Center

THE GUJARAT EARTHQUAKE 2001
Anil Kkumar Sinha,
Senior Technical Advisor, Asian Disaster Reduction Center

One of the two most deadly earthquakes to strike India in its recorded history wasthe Bhuj earthquake that shook the Indian Province of Gujarat on the morning ofJanuary 26, 2001 (Republic Day). The earthquake caused massive loss of life andinjury. It left nearly a million families homeless, and destroyed much of the area'ssocial infrastructure: from schools and village health clinics, to water supplysystems, communications and power. The Kutch district of Gujarat is the worst
affected; in many villages and several towns the destruction was nearly total.

Source: Government of India's official web site on the Gujarat earthquake http://gujaratearthquake.gov.in/final/bhuj.html

One month after the earthquake official Government of India figures placed thedeath toll at 19,727 and the number of injured at 166,000. Indications are that
600,000 people were left homeless, with 348,000 houses destroyed and anadditional 844,000 damaged. The Indian State Department estimates that theearthquake affected, directly or indirectly, 15.9 million people out of a total
population of 37.8 million. More than 20,000 cattle are reported killed. Government

1

The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction Center

estimates place direct economic losses at $1.3 billion. Other estimates indicate
losses may be as high as $5 billion.
The earthquake was followed by a large number of aftershocks. The Indian
Metrology Department (IMD) recorded more than 500 aftershocks of magnitude 3.0
and above, which continued through the month of March. The state of Gujarat is theheartland of Indian industries like petroleum, power and steel. Indeed, this M7.9earthquake is the first to hit metropolitan cities of the country in the recent times andthe modern industrial constructions.

2The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction Center

EARTHQUAKE INFORMATION AT A GLANCE• Date and time of Occurrence of Earthquake: 26 January 2001 at 8:46 am• Magnitude: 6.9 on the Richter scale with epicentre at 20 K.M. North East ofBhuj• No of districts affected: 21 out of 25 districts• Most affected areas: Kachchh, Ahmedabad, Jamnagar, Rajkot andSurendranagar.
• Death toll: 20,000 approx.
• Affected villages: 7904 villages affected in 182 talukas in 21 districts• Affected population: 15.9 million (42.06%) affected out of total population of
37.8 million• Damage:・ Houses Fully Destroyed 1.87 lakh (Pucca), 1.67 lakh (Kachcha) &0.16 lakh (huts)
・ Houses Partially Destroyed 5.01 lakh (Pucca), 3.87 lakh (Kachcha) &0.34 lakh (huts)
・ Total estimated loss of damage Rs. 21262 crore
Source: The UNDP/DMT Response to the Gujarat Earthquake: Some of its Good Practices

3

The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction Center

DESCRIPTION OF INITIAL RESPONSE ACTIVITIESThe Government of Gujarat (GoG) had set up the Gujarat State Disaster
Management Authority (GSDMA) that would implement the reconstruction andrehabilitation, with support from various other agencies in the quake-hit area. The
GoG announced four packages amounting to almost US $1 billion for reconstructionand economic rehabilitation for more than 300,000 families. The government had
also announced US$2.5 million package to revive small, medium and cottage
industries.
Table 1 Central Assistance received for emergency relief, rescue and rehabilitation
Sr. No.

Details

Rs. in Crores

1

National Calamity Contingency Fund (NCCF)

500.002

Water supply (Rural and Urban)

100.003

Prompt Electricity Development (Restoration) Programme(Rs.96 crore for Kachchh)

109.63

4

Indira Avas Yojna

49.00

5

Prime Minister Gramodaya Yojna

21.05

6Slum Development

19.07

7

Prime Minister Gram Sadak Yojna

53.86

8Operation Black Board Yojna

30.00

Total Rs.

882.61

The World Bank and the Asian Development Bank had announced loans worth$300 million and $500 million respectively. A number of other bilateral agencies
including,• European Union (EU)• Department for International Development (DFID)• United States Agency for International Development (USAID)• Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA),
had also agreed to provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation program. TheHousing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO) and the National Housing
Bank (NHB), two major public sector institutions in India's housing sector, alsooffered to provide financial assistance of US$400 million.
While there had been no major impact on industrial units owned by major corporategroups, the leading chambers - the Confederation of Indian Industries (CII) and theFederation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industries (FICCI) had offered toadopt clusters of quake-ravaged villages for relief and long-term rehabilitation. A
number of business groups such as Reliance, VSNL, Larsen & Toubro, TATA Steel,
Coca-Cola, ESSAR and Videocon had decided to contribute to the rehabilitation
program. Public sector industries too provided huge donations for rehabilitation.

4The Gujarat Earthquake 2001Asian Disaster Reduction Center

International assistance was forthcoming from,• Australia

Disaster management experts and US$550,000• Bangladesh

20,000 tons of rice and 12-member medical team
together with first aid supplies• Belgium

US$920,000 as emergency aid and reconstruction• Canada$2 million in aid -- $1.3 million to help furnish basic
necessities to quake victims and $660,000 to Canadianand Indian relief organizations and the Red Cross• China$602,000 in disaster relief; separately, China's RedCross offered $50,000• Greece$270,000 in financial aid relief supplies• Israel

150 strong -emergency aid mission• Italy

Team of experts and $2.3 million for emergency
equipment• Kuwait

US$250,000 in emergency relief from Kuwaiti Red Cross• The Netherlands

US$2.5 million through UNICEF and other aid agencies• New Zealand

Grant of US$200,000• Pakistan

13 tons of relief material comprising of blankets and foodmaterial• Syria

Medical and other relief supplies• Taiwan

US$100,000 through Red Cross• UK

Total of £10 million apart from rescue team and otherrelief supplies including 1200 tents• USRelief supplies; USAID to send US$ 5 million worth ofaid supplies apart from 80 tons of relief material it has
already sent

• UAE, Vietnam,Relief materials and supplies

Saudi Arabia
Source: High Commission of India, London, Press Release January 30, 2001, Gujarat
Earthquake Relief Update

5The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction Center

The American Red Cross of Central New Jersey had announced that the Infinity
Foundation had established a matching grant program of $10,000 with all proceeds
to go to the American Red Cross Indian Earthquake Relief Fund.
CARE International responded immediately to assist people in need. Overall,
10,000 families received immediate relief such as materials for temporary shelter,
clothing, cooking utensils, a kerosene cooker and water purification tablets. In coordination with the Indian Government, other international agencies and local
partners, CARE targeted the worst hit blocks in the Kutch region for emergency
relief to address immediate humanitarian needs and rehabilitation to re-establish
livelihoods in the longer term.
HelpAge India's response focused on rural areas, where most people were affected.
Working with four local partners - Kutch Vikas Trust (KVT), Shroff Foundation,Navjeevan Trust and Sadvichar Parivar - HelpAge India conducted rapid needs
assessments. Basic relief items were delivered to 7,500 older people and theirfamilies. Mobile Medicare Units (MMUs) provided emergency medical care invillages in Kaachch, Rajkot and Surendranagar districts.
Oxfam had focused its response on the districts of Kachchh, Surendra Nagar andRajkot as they were the most vulnerable and worst affected. The immediate relief
phase of Oxfam’s response work included food distributions to 5,000 families(approximately 25,000 people), shelter and non-food item distributions to 13,000
families (approximately 65,000 people) and clean water provision to 20,000 people,
in conjunction with the state water board. In addition 1,030 temporary bathingfacilities were constructed in Bhachau and Rapar, Kachchh District.
The Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement- Immediately after the disaster struck,the International Federation launched an appeal for £10 million to help 300,000
people for up to four months and support the Indian Red Cross’ emergency relief
activities. Due to the widespread devastation, the main objective was to provide
people with essential shelter, safe water and medical assistance. Special units wereflown in to the region to provide essential services, including a 350-bed hospital,water and sanitation units, a telecommunications team, a primary health care unit
and a British Red Cross logistics team.
WHO responded rapidly to the earthquake by placing experts in emergency andhumanitarian action in Ahmedabad and Bhuj on the morning after the earthquake.
The World Health Organization mobilized approximately US $ 1.2 Million through its
own contribution, OFDA and DFID to meet immediate public health needs of theaffected population in Kutch district of the state. Since several national andinternational agencies were taking care of immediate trauma and medical needs,
focus of WHO input was to avoid duplication of efforts. WHO input was majorly on
the following aspects in this direction:• Redressal of immediate public health needs• Post-earthquake Health Sector coordination

6

The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction Center• Containment of disease outbreaks and enhancement of capacity/

capability of disease surveillance practices• Water Quality Assurance

A large number of NGOs, national and international, participated in the relief
operations. Many of these NGOs gradually withdrew after the relief phase closed,
as they did not have sufficient resources to participate in the reconstruction program,or a long-term plan for local involvement. However, a number of larger NGOs
continued and contributed to the rehabilitation program. The government actively
sought for NGOs to adopt villages for rehabilitation. It had announced a contributionof 50 per cent of the cost of rehabilitation, if an NGO adopted a particular village forrehabilitation. The cost of reconstruction was funded through the following sources:••••••

From the Government of India and the Government of Gujarat
Through grants and loans of bilateral agencies
Through multilateral loan funding from the World Bank and the AsianDevelopment Bank
From the Prime Minister's and Chief Minister's Relief Funds
From the corporate sector and NGOs
From Insurance companies, banks and financial institutions

7

The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction CenterDESCRIPTION OF RECOVERY/ RECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND THEIRASSESSMENT

The UN System through it’s response to previous disasters in the past tens years
has acquired invaluable experience in disaster relief, recovery and coordination.
These natural disasters include the Orissa Super Cyclone, the Latur Earthquake,
the West Bengal Floods and the recurring drought crisis in several Indian states.
The ongoing programmes of the UN Family have provided the organisations with anextensive presence and engagement in a broad variety of activities in India. EachUN organisation has built up networks of NGO partners with a strong field presence,trust and credibility in local communities.
The World Bank and the Asian Development Bank had estimated that improved
reconstruction in the Indian state of Gujarat devastated by the January 26, 2001
earthquake would cost about Rs 10,600 crore (US$2.3 billion). In their joint Gujarat
Earthquake Recovery Program Assessment Report presented to the government ofGujarat, the two multilateral banks had put the total loss of assets, including private
assets, at Rs 9,900 crore (US$2.1 billion). The bulk of these losses were in thehousing sector (Rs 5,200 crore /US$1.1 billion). Among the other severely affected
sectors were education, health, rural water supply, irrigation, transport, and publicbuildings and monuments. The impact on Gujarat's fiscal deficit was expected to be
Rs 10,100 crore (US$2.2 billion) over three years. The report represented the best
assessment possible as of end-February 2001. It was based on field visits by a joint
World Bank-ADB team to the affected areas in February.
Gujarat Emergency Earthquake Reconstruction Project (GEERP) was initiated by
the Government of Gujarat, with the support of World Bank and ADB. Governmentof Gujarat reconstructed and repaired affected houses in record time of 2 years. It
took 5 years for Japan to reconstruct 134,000 houses after Kobe earthquake and it
took 2 years for Maharashtra to rebuild 8,702 houses after Latur earthquake. It isestimated that Turkey will take 6 years to reconstruct the damaged 14,000 houses
and it took Mexico 2 years to complete 48,000 houses.

8

The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction Center

REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION• Total houses to be restored by repair and reconstruction: 1,143,367• Total houses restored till date: 996,167 (87%)• Financial assistance distributed: Rs. 1,555 CroreRepairs• Total No. of eligible houses to be repaired : 929,682• Houses repaired till date: 882,896(94%)
Reconstruction• Total No. of Eligible houses to be reconstructed: 213,685• Houses reconstructed till date: 113,271 (53 %)MATERIAL BANKS• Material banks established to supply subsidized cement: 1,082• Cement bags distributed so far: 176 lakhs• Total cement distributed: 8 lakh Ton
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM• (50% cost by NGOs & 50% by government)• Number of villages adopted: 289• Number of houses to be constructed: 37,673• Houses completed: 27,432 (73%)• Houses under construction: 10,241• Villages adopted for infrastructure creation: 24 by CII, work already completed
RELOCATION OF VILLAGES
Full Relocation• Number of villages: 24• Houses to be relocated: 5,225• Houses already relocated: 3,936 (75%)
Partial Relocation• Number of villages: 37• Houses to be relocated: 10,299• Houses already relocated: 6,614 (64%)
For its highly successful implementation of the programme, the GSDMA wasawarded the UN SASAKAWA Award.

9The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction CenterASSESSMENT• The rehabilitation/ reconstruction effort was the biggest ever housing program
undertaken in the entire world in terms of numbers and geographic area
• Minimal relocation took place with no secondary displacement.
• Housing assistance packages announced in a record time with a choice ofrelocation or in-situ reconstruction to be taken by the village community.
• Owner driven housing construction facilitated by financial, material andtechnical assistance by government• Multi-hazard resistant reconstruction made mandatory to resist cyclones,
earthquake and other natural disasters• Engineers were appointed in villages to supervise housing construction andprovide technical guidance• Payments were made in three installments for new construction to ensure
multi-hazard resistant construction. The second and third installments weregiven only after verification and certification by engineers• An important move was to exempt the excise duty for building materials
produced in Kutch• Nirdeshika I and II (guidelines) were prepared to guide people forconstruction and repair• Four shake table demonstrations done for awareness generation andconfidence building• Two technical cassettes on construction and retrofitting houses shown in2500 villages• One cassette on safe construction using the medium of folk art Bhavai wasprepared and screened in 2500 villages• Audiocassette in the form of folk songs prepared giving messages on multihazard resistant construction and played in community gatherings andmeetings etc.
• Full-page advertisements in leading local dailies given for awareness creation
about proper methodologies of safe reconstruction and repair

10The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction Center• Displayed messages on the need for multi-hazard resistant construction on
600 state transport buses in the earthquake-affected areas• 7 types of hoardings, at strategic locations in various places in the state
regarding safe housing construction• The need for safe housing construction and retrofitting was taken up as anagenda in the gram sabha in all the 18000 villages of Gujarat.
• Guidelines prepared and distributed for various issues related to housing
reconstruction and repair. Special guidelines have been prepared for using
local material and for local needs and designs of houses to make them multihazard resistance.
• Repair, reconstruction and retrofitting of masonry buildings was undertaken• Masons training manual was prepared.
• Payments made directly in the bank accounts. More than 365000 bankaccounts opened in a record time of 3 months.
• Quality audit: In order to exercise check and ensure quality, independent thirdparty quality auditors have been appointed to check all the housesreconstructed and give independent feedback.
• Masons and Engineers trained for multi-hazard resistantreconstruction. Over 27000 masons and 6000 engineers trained.

housing• Massive information, education and communication activity undertaken to
educate people on multi-hazard resistant construction• Over one million pamphlets on safe housing repair and reconstruction
distributed in earthquake-affected areas.
• All newly constructed houses are in joint ownership of husband and wife
• A remarkable feature about reconstruction is that all reconstructed houses
are insured against fourteen types of natural and man-made disasters• Committees at village - and district-levels have been constituted forgrievance redressal and for strengthening the implementation program.

• District Judge is declared as the Ombudsman to enquire into any complaints
and petitions received from people and direct the administration to do theneedful.

11The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction Center

References• Lessons from Recent Indian Earthquakes- Editorial as Guest Editor of Special
Issue on Earthquakes in India, Indian Concrete Journal Vol. 72, No. 11
November 1998 - Sudhir K. Jain, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian
Institute of Technology Kanpur• IFRC--Choreographer of Disaster Management-The Gujarat Earthquake• Bilham, The 1737 Calcutta Earthquake and Cyclone Evaluated, Bull. Seism.
Soc. Amer. 84(5), 1650-1657, 1994
• Gujarat Emergency Earthquake Reconstruction Project- Quarterly Progress
Report, July – September 2003, Gujarat State Disaster ManagementAuthority, Government of Gujarat• Gujarat Emergency Earthquake Reconstruction Project- After 700 DaysDecember 2002, Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority, Governmentof Gujarat• Gujarat Earthquake Recovery Program- Assessment Report, A Joint Reportby the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank to the Governments ofGujarat and India, March 14, 2001
• www.ifrc.org• Emergency Response for Sustainable Development- WHO Technical Input inGujarat & India• World Bank & Asian Development Bank - Preliminary Gujarat Earthquake
Damage Assessment and Recovery Plan
• Gujarat Earthquake - UN System Response- Summary of Action Plan - The
UNDP/ DMT Response to the Gujarat Earthquake: Some of its Good
Practices• www.gujaratindia.com• http://www.rurkiu.ernet.in/acads/depts/earthquake/bhuj/index.html• www.civil.iitb.ernet.in/BhujEarthquake/Earthquake_Web_Page.htm.
• www.eeri.org• 2001 Bhuj - National Information Center of Earthquake Engineering (NICEE)at IIT Kanpur

12

The Gujarat Earthquake 2001

Asian Disaster Reduction Center• GUJARAT EARTHQUAKE: ONE YEAR LATER – A report by World Bank
• News Release: May 2, 2002 India: Gujarat Earthquake Victims to Receive
More Support to Rebuild Lives• Asian Development Bank
• www.gsdma.org• International Seminar on “Disaster Preparedness and Mitigation”, 21-23
November 2002, JOINTLY ORGANISED BY Government of India [GoI] and United
Nations Development Programme [UNDP] and Confederation of Indian
Industry [CII] – A Concept Note• Nano Seeber et al, Field observations bearing on the genesis of the January26, 2001 Republic Day Earthquake of India resulting from a field survey of theepicentral region by NSF - SCEC Team• Krishna S. Vatsa, The Bhuj Earthquake, District of Kutch, State of Gujarat(India), January 26, 2001- A Reconnaissance Report - Identification of Priority
Issues, Prepared for DRM-World Institute for Disaster Risk Management,March 16, 2001

13